Scholia vetera in Sophoclis "Trachinias" 3110227029, 9783110227024

Table of contents :
Frontmatter
Contents
Abbreviations and Bibliography
Introduction
Textus criticus
Indices

Citation preview

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

Sammlung griechischer und lateinischer Grammatiker (SGLG) Herausgegeben von

Klaus Alpers · Ian C. Cunningham

Band 13

De Gruyter

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias edited by

Georgios A. Xenis

De Gruyter

ISBN 978-3-11-022702-4 e-ISBN 978-3-11-022703-1 ISSN 1862-2372 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias / edited by Georgios A. Xenis. p. cm. ⫺ (Sammlung griechischer und lateinischer Grammatiker, ISSN 1862-2372 ; v. 13) Text in Greek, introduction in English. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-3-11-022702-4 (hardcover : alk. paper) ISBN 978-3-11-022703-1 (ebk.) 1. Sophocles. Trachiniae. 2. Sophocles ⫺ Scholia. I. Xenis, Georgios A. PA4413.T7S35 2010 8821.01⫺dc22 2010028068

Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar. 쑔 2010 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/New York Satz: Katharina Fischer, Berlin Druck und buchbinderische Verarbeitung: Hubert & Co. GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen ⬁ Gedruckt auf säurefreiem Papier Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com

For my grandmother Eva 1915–2010

Preface This volume is the second in a series which is designed to establish new critical texts of the scholia vetera to the tragedies of Sophocles. It is my goal in this second volume, as it was in its predecessor, the scholia vetera to the Electra, to restore the scholia vetera to the Trachiniae in their oldest recoverable version and corpus. This statement contains a number of key terms which are not explained here. What is a version, what does it tell us about the nature of the transmission of scholia in general, and what are its implications for the editor? What exactly do the oldest recoverable version and corpus represent, and why is it desirable to seek after them at the expense of other versions and corpora? By what methods can we gain access to this oldest version and corpus? These questions as well as the principles which guide me in the constitution of the text are fundamental for a proper understanding of the character of this edition, but are thoroughly dealt with in the first volume, and more specifically in the sections on ‘Editing Scholia: Methodological considerations and the scope of the present edition’, and on ‘The present edition’. Likewise, I do not repeat the description of the manuscripts nor do I outline the distinguishing features of the Roman version again. In this volume I do discuss issues which are peculiar to the new text, and most importantly its manuscript tradition. For the Trachiniae scholia vetera and the Electra scholia vetera differ in that the former text exists in four versions whereas the latter exists in two, and in the fact that the former lacks an indirect tradition. Therefore I provide a description of the two new versions, namely the Triclinian and a-version, as well as an analysis of the manuscripts’ interrelationships. I also take a fresh look at the previous editions, but only to highlight matters specifically related to the treatment of this text. For the general characteristics of these editions the reader should consult the first volume once again.

Preface

VIII

Once again I wish to record my gratitude to Professor Klaus Alpers and Mr Ian Cunningham who read the final version of the book and provided me with their invaluable comments and expert advice. Ms Stephanie Roussou placed me in her debt by her assistance in proofreading the manuscript. Finally, it is a pleasure to acknowledge the support of Dr Sabine Vogt, my editor at Walter de Gruyter, and of Ms Katharina Fischer, who skilfully prepared the camera-ready copy of the book. University of Cyprus, Nicosia August 2010

Georgios A. Xenis

Contents Preface ....................................................................................... VII Abbreviations and Bibliography....................................................1 Works cited in Introduction..................................................................... 1 Conspectus scriptorum veterum qui per compendium notantur ............................................................................................... 2 Conspectus editionum et commentationum quae per compendium notantur ................................................................... 6 Conspectus siglorum ............................................................................... 9

Introduction .................................................................................11 1 The versions and their manuscripts................................................... 13 2 Characteristics of the versions and/ or affiliations of their manuscripts ............................................................................ 16 The Laurentian version: L ſ Lp ..................................................... 16 The Roman version: M R ............................................................... 22 The a-version: A U Y ..................................................................... 25 The Triclinian version: T Ta........................................................... 33 Stemma of the tradition .................................................................. 41 3 Previous editions............................................................................... 43 3.1 Lascaris .................................................................................... 43 3.2 Juntine...................................................................................... 46 3.3 Turnebus .................................................................................. 46 3.4 Estienne.................................................................................... 47 3.5 Brunck ..................................................................................... 48 3.6 Papageorgiou ........................................................................... 49

Textus criticus..............................................................................51

X

Contents

Indices........................................................................................259 Scriptores in scholiis laudati................................................................ 261 Verba de quibus scholia agunt............................................................. 262 Grammatica ......................................................................................... 268 Rhetorica ............................................................................................. 269 Scaenica, ars tragica, histriones........................................................... 270

Abbreviations and Bibliography1 Works cited in Introduction Aubreton R. 1949, Démétrius Triclinius et les recensions médiévales de Sophocle, Paris. Christodoulou G. 1977, ƇȮ ƾƣƩƔʎƔ ƥƩƮƞƜƔ ƘǮƤ ŵDzƔƟƦƔ Ʀơʝ ƆơƨơƝƞƐơƧƤ. žƣƜƦƜƝȲ ǒƝƗơƥƜƤ, ǎƟ džƛƑƟƔƜƤ. De Marco V. 1936, ‘Sulla tradizione manoscritta degli scolii sofoclei’ SIFC n.s. 13, 3– 44. — 1951, ‘Gli scolii all’ Edipo a Colono di Sofocle e la loro tradizione manoscritta’, Rendiconti della Accademia di Archeologia, Lettere e Belle Arti Napoli, n. s. 26, 1–43. — 1952, Scholia in Sophoclis Oedipum Coloneum, Romae. Eleuteri P. 1993, I manoscritti greci della Biblioteca Palatina di Parma, Milano. Janz T. 2004, The Scholia to Sophocles’ Philoctetes. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Oxford, Faculty of Classics 2004. Olivier J.-M. – Monégier du Sorbier M.-A. 1983, Catalogue des manuscrits grecs de Tchécoslovaquie, Paris. Papageorgiou P. 1888, Scholia in Sophoclis tragoedias vetera, Lipsiae. Tessier A. 2005, Demetrio Triclinio. Scolii metrici alla tetrada sofolea, Alessandria. Thompson E.M. – Jebb R.C. 1885, Facsimile of the Laurentian Manuscript of Sophocles, London. Turyn. A. 1949, ‘The Sophocles recension of Manuel Moschopulus’, TAPhA 80, 94– 173. — 1952, Studies in the manuscript tradition of the tragedies of Sophocles, Urbana. Wolff G. 1843, De Sophoclis scholiorum laurentianorum variis lectionibus, Lipsiae. Xenis G. 2010, Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Electram, SGLG 12, Berlin–New York.

1

For a full bibliography, see Xenis 2010, 1–3.

2

Abbreviations and Bibliography

Conspectus scriptorum veterum qui per compendium notantur Ael. D.

‘ŵǮƞƒơƧ ŸƜơƟƧƥƒơƧ LJƞƜƝƔƣƟƔƥƥƐƫƤ džƦƦƜƝʬƟ ǾƟơμƏƦƫƟ ƞƮƖơƜ ƢƐƟƦƘ’, ed. H. Erbse, Untersuchungen zu den attizistischen Lexica, Berlin 1950, 95–151.

Amm.

Ammonii qui dicitur liber de adfinium vocabulorum differentia, ed. K. Nickau, Lipsiae 1966.

Apion … L

A. Ludwich, ‘Über die homerische Glossen Apions’,

Apion … N

Philologus 74 (1917) 209–47; 75 (1919) 95–103. Apions ŷƞʬƥƥƔƜ ȇμƚƣƜƝƔƒ, hrsg. von S. Neitzel, SGLG 3,

Apollon. Dysc. Pron. Apollon. Dysc. Adv. Apollon. S. [Arc.] Ar. Byz. Choer. Orth. Choer. sch. Th.

Did. EM Erot. Et. Gen. Ɣ 1–ƕ 312

Et. Sym. Ɣ 1– ƕ 273 Eudem. Rhet. Eust. Il. Eust. Od.

Berlin–New York 2007, 185–328. džƢơƞƞƫƟƒơƧ džƞƘƠƔƟƗƣƐƫƤ ƄƘƣȴ ƾƟƦƫƟƧμƒƔƤ, rec. R. Schneider, Lipsiae 1878, 3–116. džƢơƞƞƫƟƒơƧ džƞƘƠƔƟƗƣƐƫƤ ƄƘƣȴ ǎƢƜƣƣƚμƏƦƫƟ, rec. R. Schneider, ibid. 119–210. Apollonii Sophistae Lexicon Homericum, rec. I. Bekker, Berolini 1833. ǖƢƜƦơμȲ ƦʀƤ ƝƔƛơƞƜƝʀƤ ƢƣơƥʪƗƒƔƤ ǧƣƫƗƜƔƟơʝ, ed. M. Schmidt, Ienae 1860. Aristophanis Byzantii Fragmenta, ed. W. Slater, SGLG 6, Berlin–New York 1986. Georgii Choerobosci Orthographia, ed. J.A. Cramer, in

Anecdota Graeca e codd. manuscriptis bibliothecarum Oxoniensium, vol. II, Oxonii 1835, 167–281. Georgii Choerobosci Prolegomena et scholia in Theodosii Alexandrini canones isagogicos de flexione nominum, ed. A.

Hilgard, vol. I, 103–417, Lipsiae 1889 (Grammatici Graeci IV). Didymi Chalcenteri grammatici Alexandrini Fragmenta quae supersunt omnia, collegit et disposuit M. Schmidt, Lipsiae 1854. Etymologicum Magnum, ed. Th. Gaisford, Oxonii 1848. Erotiani Vocum Hippocraticarum collectio cum fragmentis, rec. E. Nachmanson, Upsaliae 1918. Etymologicum Magnum Genuinum, Symeonis Etymologicum una cum Magna Grammatica, Etymologicum Magnum Auctum, ed. F. Lasserre – N. Livadaras, vol. I: Ɣ–ƾμƫƥƖƐƢƫƤ (sic), Romae 1976; vol. II: ƾƟƏ–ƕưƦơƣƘƤ, Athenis 1992. vide Et. Gen. Ɣ 1–ƕ 312 ƄƘƣȴ ƞƐƠƘƫƟ ʜƚƦơƣƜƝʬƟ, ed. B. Niese: ‘Excerpta ex Eudemi codice Parisino n. 2635’, Philologus, suppl. 15 (1922) p. 145– 60. Eustathii Archiepiscopi Thessalonicensis Commentarii ad Iliadem pertinentes, ed. M. van der Valk, vol. I–IV, Leiden 1971–87. Commentarii ad Homeri Odysseam, ed. G. Stallbaum, vol. I– II, Lipsiae 1825–6.

Conspectus scriptorum veterum qui per compendium notantur

Hdn. Hdn. ƝƔƛ. Ƣƣơƥ. Hdn. ǤƟ Hdn. μơƟ. ƞƐƠ. Hdn. ƢƔƣƘƝƕ. Harp. Hesych.

Ioh. Al.

Lex. Patm. Lex. Vind. Moer. Orus Paus. att. Philox. Phot.

Phryn. PS Poll. Ɔ

3

Herodiani Technici Reliquiae, ed. A. Lentz, vol. I–II, Lipsiae 1867–70. ǖƝ ƦʬƟ ǧƣƫƗƜƔƟơʝ ƄƘƣȴ ƝƔƛơƞƜƝʀƤ ƢƣơƥʪƗȵƔƤ, ibid. I, 1– 547. ǖƝ ƦʬƟ ǧƣƫƗƜƔƟơʝ ƀơƟƮƕƜƕƞơƤ ƢƘƣȴ Ʀơʝ ǤƟ, ibid. II, 785–6. ŵǮƞƒơƧ ǧƣƫƗƜƔƟơʝ ƄƘƣȴ μơƟƑƣơƧƤ ƞƐƠƘƫƤ, ibid. II, 908–52. ǖƝ ƦʬƟ ǧƣƫƗƜƔƟơʝ ƄƔƣƘƝƕơƞƔȴ Ʀơʝ μƘƖȯƞơƧ ʜȳμƔƦơƤ, ed. La Roche, J, Programm Akad. Gymn. Vienna, 1863. Harpocrationis, Lexicon in decem oratores Atticos, ex recensione G. Dindorfii, tom. I, Oxonii 1853.2 Hesychii Alexandrini Lexicon, vol. I–II [ŵ–O], rec. et emend. K. Latte, Hauniae 1953–66; vol. III [Ƅ–Ɔ], editionem post K. Latte continuans rec. et emend. P. Allan Hansen, SGLG 11/3, Berlin–New York 2005; vol. IV [Ƈ–ƌ], rec. et emend. P. Allen Hansen et I.C. Cunningham, SGLG 11/4, Berlin–New York 2009. Iohannis Alexandrini Praecepta Tonica, recognovit Georgios A. Xenis, Berolini et Novi Eboraci, Walter de Gruyter (Bibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana); editio anno proximo in lucem proferetur. ‘Lexicon Patmense. ſƐƠƘƜƤ μƘƛ’ ǯƥƦơƣƜʬƟ ǎƝ ƦʬƟ ŸƚμơƥƛƐƟơƧƤ ƞƮƖƫƟ’, ed. I. Sakkelion, BCH 1 (1887) 10–6, 137–55 (= LGM 140–65). Lexicon Vindobonense, rec. A. Nauck, Petropoli 1867. Das attizistische Lexikon des Moeris, Quellenkritische Untersuchungen und Edition, hrsg. von D. Hansen, SGLG 9, Berlin–New York 1998. Das attizistische Lexicon des Oros, untersucht und kritische Ausgabe der Fragmente von K. Alpers, SGLG 4, Berlin–New York 1981. ‘ƄƔƧƥƔƟƒơƧ džƦƦƜƝʬƟ ǾƟơμƏƦƫƟ ƥƧƟƔƖƫƖƑ’, ed. H. Erbse, Untersuchungen zu den attizistischen Lexica, Berlin 1950, 152–221. Die Fragmente des Grammatikers Philoxenos, hrsg. von Chr. Theodorides, SGLG 2, Berlin–New York 1976. Photii Patriarchae Lexicon, vol. I–II [ŵ–M], ed. Chr. Theodorides, Berlin–New York 1982–98; reliqua in ƉƫƦƒơƧ Ʀơʝ ƄƔƦƣƜƏƣƩơƧ ſƐƠƘƫƟ ƆƧƟƔƖƫƖƑ, e codice Galeano descripsit R. Porsonus, Partes I–II, Londini 1822. Phrynichi Sophistae Praeparatio Sophistica, ed. I. de Borries, Lipsiae 1911. Pollucis Onomasticon, e codicibus ab ipso collatis denuo ed. et adnotavit E. Bethe, vol. I–II, Lipsiae 1900–31. ƆƧƟƔƖƫƖȲ ƞƐƠƘƫƟ ƩƣƚƥƒμƫƟ, Versio antiqua; in Synagoge,

ƆƧƟƔƖƫƖȲ ƞƐƠƘƫƟ ƩƣƚƥƒμƫƟ, Texts of the Original Version

2

For the edition by J.J. Keaney, Amsterdam 1992, see R. Otranto, QS 19 (luglio– dicembre 1993) 225–31 and W. Slater, BMCRev 94.06.07.

4

Abbreviations and Bibliography

and of MS. B, edited by I.C. Cunningham, SGLG 10, Berlin– New York 2003, 71–523. Ɔb

ƆƧƟƔƖƫƖȲ ƞƐƠƘƫƟ ƩƣƚƥƒμƫƟ ǎƝ ƗƜƔƨƮƣƫƟ ƥơƨʬƟ ƦƘ ƝƔȴ ʜƚƦƮƣƫƟ ƢơƞƞʬƟ, Versio codicis B; in Synagoge, ƆƧƟƔƖƫƖȲ ƞƐƠƘƫƟ ƩƣƚƥƒμƫƟ, Texts of the Original Version and of MS. B, edited by I.C. Cunningham, SGLG 10, Berlin–New York 2003, 525–701.

Sch. Aesch.

Scholia Graeca in Aeschylum quae exstant omnia, ed. O.L.

Sch. Aesch. Pers.

Aeschyli tragoediae superstites et deperditarum fragmenta, ex recensione G. Dindorfii, tom. III: Scholia Graeca ex codicibus aucta et emendata, Oxonii 1851, 70–92. The Older Scholia on the Prometheus Bound, ed. C. J. Herington, Leiden 1972. Scholia in Aeschinem, ed. ƀ.R. Dilts, Stutgardiae et Lipsiae 1992. Scholia in Apollonium Rhodium vetera, rec. C. Wendel, Berolini 1935. Scholia in Aelium Aristidem, ed. W. Dindorf, Leipzig 1829. Scholia in Aristophanis Acharnenses, ed. N.G. Wilson, Groningen 1975. Scholia vetera et recentiora in Aristophanis Aves, ed. D. Holwerda, Groningen 1991. Scholia vetera in Aristophanis Equites, ed. D. Mervyn Jones, Groningen 1969. Scholia vetera in Nubes, ed. D. Holwerda, Groningen 1977. Scholia vetera in Aristophanis Plutum, ed. M. Chantry, Groningen 1994. Scholia vetera in Aristophanis Ranas, ed. M. Chantry, Groningen 1999. Scholia in Thesmophoriazusas, ed. R.F. Regtuit, Groningen 2007. Scholia vetera et recentiora in Aristophanis Vespas, ed. W.J.W. Koster, Groningen 1978. Scholia in Aratum vetera, ed. J. Martin, Stutgardiae 1974. Scholia Demosthenica, ed. M.R. Dilts, vol. I–II, Lipsiae 1983– 6. Scholia in Euripidem, ed. E. Schwarz, vol. I–II, Berolini 1887– 91. Scholia vetera in Hesiodi Opera et dies, ed. A. Pertusi, Milano 1955. Scholia Graeca in Homeri Iliadem, rec. H. Erbse, vol. I–V, Berolini 1969–77. Scholia graeca in Odysseam, ed. F. Pontani, vol. I: scholia ad libros Ɣ–ƕ, Roma 2007; reliqua in Scholia Graeca in Homeri Odysseam ex codicibus aucta et emendata, ed. G. Dindorf, vol. I–II, Oxonii 1855.

Sch. Aesch. Pr. Sch. Aeschin. Sch. Ap. Rh. Sch. Aristid. Sch. Ar. Ach. Sch. Ar. Av. Sch. Ar. Eq. Sch. Ar. Nub. Sch. Ar. Plut. Sch. Ar. Ra. Sch. Ar. Th. Sch. Ar. Vesp. Sch. Arat. Sch. Dem. Sch. Eur. Sch. Hes. Op. Sch. Hom. Il. Sch. Hom. Od.

Smith, vol. I2, Lipsiae 1993; vol. II.2, ib. 1982.

Conspectus scriptorum veterum qui per compendium notantur

Sch. D. Hom. Il. Sch. Lyc. Sch. Opp. Hal. Sch. Pi. Sch. Plat. Sch. Soph. Sch. Ai. Sch. El. Sch. OC Sch. Theocr. Sch. Thuc. Steph. Byz.

Strab. Su. Theogn.

Thom. Mag. Ecl. Tim. Zonar.

3

5

Scholia D in Iliadem secundum codices manu scriptos, ed. H. van Thiel (Proecdosis 2000): http://www.uni-koeln.de/philfak/ifa/vanthiel/scholiaD.pdf. Scholia vetera et paraphrases in Lycophronis Alexandram, ed. P. Aloisius M. Leone, Congedo Editore 2002. Scholia in Oppiani Halieutica, ed. U.C. Bussemaker, in Scholia in Theocritum, ed. F. Dübner, Parisiis 1849, 260–364. Scholia vetera in Pindari carmina, ed. A.B. Drachmann, vol. I– III, Lipsiae 1903–27. Scholia Platonica, by W.C. Greene, Haverford 1938. Scholia in Sophoclis tragoedias vetera, ed. P.N. Papageorgius, Lipsiae 1888. G.A. Christodoulou, ƇȮ ƾƣƩƔʎƔ ƥƩȷƞƜƔ ƘǮƤ ŵDzƔƟƦƔ Ʀơʝ ƆơƨơƝƞȱơƧƤ, žƣƜƦƜƝȲ ǒƝƗơƥƜƤ, ǎƟ džƛȳƟƔƜƤ 1977. Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Electram, ed. G. Xenis, SGLG 12, Berlin–New York 2010. Scholia in Sophoclis Oedipum Coloneum, ed. V. de Marco, Romae 1952. Scholia in Theocritum vetera, rec. C. Wendel, Lipsiae 1914. Scholia in Thucydidem, ed. C. Hude, Leipzig 1927. Stephani Byzantii Ethnica, vol. I (ŵ–ŷ), rec. germanice vertit adnotationibus indicibusque instruxit M. Billerbeck, Berolini et Novi Eboraci 2006; reliqua in Stephan von Byzanz, Ethnika, ed. A. Meineke, Berlin 1849. Strabons Geographika, hrsg. von S. Radt, Bde 1–7, Göttingen 2002–8. Suidae Lexicon, ed. A. Adler, vol. I–V, Lipsiae 1928–38. Theognostos ƄƘƣȴ ǾƣƛơƖƣƔƨƒƔƤ, can. 1–84, ed. K. Alpers, Hamburg 1964; reliquos ed. J.A. Cramer in Anecdota Graeca e codd. manuscriptis bibliothecarum Oxoniensium (= AO), vol. II, Oxonii 1835, 15–165. Thomae Magistri sive Theoduli Monachi, Ecloga Vocum Atticarum, ex recensione et cum prolegomenis F. Ritschelii, Halis Saxonum 1832. Timaei Sophistae Lexicon vocum Platonicarum, ed. D. Ruhnken, editio nova, curavit G. Koch, Lipsiae 1828.3 Iohannis Zonarae Lexicon, ed. I.A.H. Tittmann, vol. I–II, Lipsiae 1908.

For the edition by M. Bonelli, Leiden 2007, see K. Alpers, Mnemosyne 62 (2009), 664–74.

6

Abbreviations and Bibliography

Conspectus editionum et commentationum quae per compendium notantur BDR

F. Blass – A. Debrunner, Grammatik des neutestamentlichen Griechisch; bearbeitet von F. Rehkopf, 14. völlig neubearbeitete und

Bergk Bernardakis

Sophoclis tragoediae, ed. Th. Bergk, Lipsiae 1858.

erweiterte Auflage, Göttingen 1976. ŷ. ŶƘƣƟƔƣƗƏƝƚ, ‘ƄƘƣȴ ƦʬƟ ƢƔƞƔƜʬƟ Ʀơʝ ƆơƨơƝƞƐơƧƤ ƥƩơƞƒƫƟ’,

ƉƜƞơƞơƖƜƝȶƤ ƆƯƞƞơƖơƤ ŪƄƔƣƟƔƥƥƮƤŪ, ǖƢƘƦƚƣƒƤ, ƕŪ ǒƦơƤ, 1898, 19– 70. Blaydes

The Trachiniae of Sophocles, critically revised, with the aid of mss. newly collated, and explained, by F.H.M. Blaydes, London–Edinburgh 1871.

Brunck1

Sophoclis quae extant omnia cum veterum grammaticorum scholiis. Superstites tragoedias VII ad optimorum exemplarium fidem recensuit, versione et notis illustravit, deperditarum fragmenta collegit R.F.Ph. Brunck, vol. I (continens Oedipos duos, Antigonam et Trachinias) – vol. II (continens Ajacem, Philoctetam et Electram), Argentorati 1786.

Brunck2

Sophoclis tragoediae septem cum scholiis veteribus, versione latina et notis. Accedunt deperditorum dramatum fragmenta. Ex editione

de Marco Dindorf Dindorf2

R.F.Ph. Brunck, Argentorati 1788. ‘De scholiis in Sophoclis tragoedias veteribus’, Memorie della Reale Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, ser. VI, 6 (1937), 105–229.

Scholia in Sophoclis tragoedias septem ex codicibus aucta et emendata, vol. II, ed. G. Dindorfius, Oxonii 1852. Ad Sophoclis tragoedias annotationes Gulielmi Dindorfii, Oxonii 1836.

Ellendt Elmsley Hartung

Lexicon Sophocleum adhibitis veterum interpretum explicationibus, grammaticorum notationibus, recentiorum doctorum commentariis, composuit F. Ellendt, vol. I–II, Regimontii Prussorum 1835. Scholia in Sophoclis tragoedias septem, e codice ms. laurentiano descripsit P. Elmsley, Oxonii 1825. Sophokles’ Trachinierinnen, Griechisch mit metrischer Übersetzung und prüfenden und erklärenden Anmerkungen von J.A. Hartung, Leipzig 1851.

Hermann

Notae sive lectiones ad tragicorum graecorum veterum Aeschyli, Sophoclis, Euripidis quae supersunt dramata deperditorumque reliquias, auctore B. Heath, Oxonii 1762. Sophoclis Trachiniae. Ad optimorum librorum fidem recensuit et

Hermann2

Sophoclis Trachiniae. Ad optimorum librorum fidem iterum recensuit

Heath

brevibus notis instruxit G. Hermannus, Lipsiae 1822. et brevibus notis instruxit G. Hermannus, ed. altera, Lipsiae 1848. Iuntina

ƆơƨơƝƞƐơƧƤ ƦƣƔƖƫƗƒƔƜ (sic) ǏƢƦȮ μƘƦȮ ƥƩơƞƒƫƟ ƢƔƞƔƜʬƟ ƝƔȴ ƢƏƟƧ ǾƨƘƞƒμƫƟ (sic). Sophoclis tragoediae septem cum interpretationibus vetustis et valde utilibus, ed. Antonius Francinus Varchiensis, Florentiae, per haeredes Philippi Iuntae, 1522.

Conspectus editionum et commentationum quae per compendium notantur

Jebb Kamerbeek Kruytbosch Lascaris

Lloyd-Jones – Wilson Meineke Nauck Neue Papageorgiou Pauli Scaliger SD II

7

Sophocles. The plays and fragments. With critical notes, commentary, and translation in English prose, by R.C. Jebb, Part V: The Trachiniae, Cambridge 1892. The plays of Sophocles. Commentaries. Vol. II: The Trachiniae, Leiden 1959. Annotationes ad scholia in Sophoclis tragoedias septem, scripsit B. Kruytbosch, Lugduni Batavorum 1882. Commentarii in septem tragedias (sic) Sophoclis quae ex aliis eius compluribus iniuria temporum amissis, solae superfuerunt. Opus exactissimum rarissimumque in Gymnasio Mediceo Caballini montis a Leone Decimo Pont. Max. constituto recognitum repurgatumque atque ad communem studiosorum utilitatem in plurima exemplaria editum non sine privilegio ut in caeteris. ƆƩȷƞƜƔ ƦʬƟ ƢȯƟƧ ƗơƝȵμƫƟ ƘǮƤ ƦȮƤ ƥƫƙơμȱƟƔƤ (sic) ƦʬƟ ƆơƨơƝƞȱơƧƤ ƦƣƔƖʪƗƜʬƟ, Romae 1518. Sophoclis Fabulae, recognoverunt brevique adnotatione critica instruxerunt H. Lloyd-Jones et N. G. Wilson, Oxonii 1990. Sophoclis Oedipus Coloneus, cum scholiis graecis, edidit et annotavit A. Meineke. Accedunt Analecta Sophoclea, Berolini 1863. A. Nauck, ‘De scholiis in Sophoclis tragoedias a P.N. Papageorgio editis’, Bulletin de l’Académie Impériale des Sciences de St. Pétersbourg n. s. 1 (1890), 411–41. Sophoclis tragoediae. Recognovit ac brevi annotatione scholarum in usum instruxit F. Nevius, Lipsiae 1831. Scholia in Sophoclis tragoedias vetera, e codice laurentiano denuo collato edidit commentario critico instruxit indices adiecit P.N. Papageorgius, Lipsiae 1888. De scholiorum laurentianorum ad Sophoclis verba restituenda usu, scripsit O. Pauli, Gottingae 1865. Unpublished autograph marginalia by J. Scaliger jotted in a copy of H. Stephanus’ edition of Sophocles (Geneva 1568); the copy is held in the Library of Leiden University under the shelfmark 756 D 25. Griechische Grammatik, auf der Grundlage von Karl Brugmanns Griechischer Grammatik von Eduard Schwyzer, 2. Band, Syntax und Syntaktische Stilistik, vervollständigt und herausgegeben von A. Debrunner, München 1950.

Stephanus

ƆơƨơƝƞƐơƧƤ Ɣǯ ǏƢƦȮ ƦƣƔƖʪƗƒƔƜ. Sophoclis tragoediae septem una cum omnibus Graecis scholiis & cum Latinis Ioach. Camerarii. Annotationes Henrici Stephani in Sophoclem & Euripidem seorsum excusae, simul prodeunt, 1568.

Stiehle

R. Stiehle, ‘Zu den Fragmenten der griechischen Historiker’, Philologus 8 (1853) 590–651. R. Stiehle, ‘Zu den Fragmenten der griechischen Historiker’, Philologus 9 (1854) 462–514.

Stiehle2 Turnebus

ŸƚμƚƦƣƒơƧ Ʀơʝ ƇƣƜƝƞƜƟƒơƧ ŹǮƤ ƦȮ Ʀơʝ ƆơƨơƝƞƐơƧƤ ǏƢƦȮ ƗƣƏμƔƦƔ, ƄƘƣȴ μƐƦƣƫƟ ơǵƤ ǎƩƣƑƥƔƦơ ƆơƨơƝƞʀƤ, ƢƘƣȴ ƥƩƚμƏƦƫƟ, ƝƔȴ ƥƩƮƞƜƔ,

Valckenaer

Observationes in Sophoclem: unpublished autograph manuscript by L.

Parisiis: Apud Adrianum Turnebum typographum regium 1553. Valckenaer held in the Library of Leiden University under the shelfmark BPL 384.

8 Valckenaer2 van Staveren Wansink Wecklein

Abbreviations and Bibliography

Unpublished autograph marginalia by L. Valckenaer jotted in a copy of a printed edition of Sophocles (Cambridge 1669); the copy is held in the Library of Leiden University under the shelfmark 755 D 12. Augustini van Staveren, ‘Emendationes in Pausaniam & alios’, Miscellaneae observationes criticae in auctores veteres et recentiores, vol. X, tom. II, Amstelaedami 1739, 296–310.

De scholiis in Sophoclis tragoedias veteribus a P.N. Papageorgio editis, scripsit H.J.F.A. Wansink, Lugduni Batavorum 1895. N. Wecklein, Ars Sophoclis emendandi. Accedunt analecta Euripidea, Wirceburgi 1869.

Wolff

De Sophoclis scholiorum laurentianorum variis lectionibus, scripsit Dr

Wunder

Sophoclis tragoediae, rec. et explanavit E. Wunderus, vol. II sect. III

G. Wolff, Lipsiae 1843. continens Trachinias, editio secunda, Gothae 1850. Wunder2 Wunder3 Xenis Zielinski

De scholiorum in Sophoclis tragoedias auctoritate, scripsit E. Wunderus, Grimae 1838. E. Wunderi, Emendationes in Sophoclis Trachinias, Grimae 1841. G. Xenis, ‘Corrupt passages in the scholia vetera on Sophocles’ Trachiniae’, Philologus 154 (2010), forthcoming. Th. Zielinski, ‘Zametki k tragediam Sofokla I k scholiam na nikh’, Zhournal ministerstva narodnago prosvescheniya, (July–Aug. 1892) 1–62.

Conspectus siglorum

9

Conspectus siglorum Sigla Sophoclis librorum L M R r T

Laurentianus 32.9, saec. X, p. 13 Mutinensis a.T.9.4, saec. XV, p. 14 Vaticanus graecus 2291, saec. XV, p. 14 fons M et R Parisinus graecus 2711, saec. XIV, p. 15 Raro memorantur

ſ Lp Ta V A U Y a

Lugdunensis Bibl. Publ. Graecus 60A, saec. X, p. 13 Parisinus graecus 2799, saec. XV–XVI, p. 13 Venetus Marcianus graecus 470, saec. XV, p. 15 Venetus Marcianus graecus 468, ca. 1290 Parisinus graecus 2712, ca. 1300, p. 15 Venetus Marcianus graecus 467, ca. 1310, p. 15 Vindobonensis philosophicus – philologicus graecus 48, saec. XIV, p. 15 fons A, U et Y Sigla varia

Aa.c. Ai.l. Ap.c. As.l.

A ante correctionem A in linea A post correctionem A supra lineam

accuratiss. c. fin. gl. h.l. l.c. lm. (ƕơƯƝƣƔƟơƤ n.) R

accuratissimum (lemma) coniungitur vel coniunguntur finis glossa, ae etc hoc loco loco citato lemma, atis etc scholium ad verbum poetae ƕơƯƝƣƔƟơƤ numero adhibito scriba libri R rettulit

10

Abbreviations and Bibliography

(ƝƾƠ ƾƖƘƟƟƑƦƫƟ s.) L pr. sch. y cum sch. x c. in A (ǂƞƞƫƤ)

haec a sch. pr. separavi :

( ) | [Ɣ]

Ɣ–ƕ Ɣ…ƕ

scholium ad verba poetae ƝƾƠ ƾƖƘƟƟƑƦƫƟ signo adhibito scriba libri L rettulit prior, prius etc scholium y cum scholio x coniungitur, i.e. scriba libri A scholium x et scholium y (hoc ordine) continue scripsit adverbio ǂƞƞƫƤ pro voce coniunctiva utens haec, quae in codd. cum scholio priore coniuncta leguntur, separatim collocavi scholium novum esse iudicans lemma quod in codicibus invenitur lemma (vel pars lemmatis) ab editore additum versus finis littera ab editore deleta littera ab editore addita ab Ɣ usque ad ƕ Ɣ et ƕ

In papyro edenda (vide sch. 372a) siglis usus sum hisce: [Ɣ] Ɣś |

littera perdita et coniectura restituta littera partim perdita vel incerta lineae finis

Introduction

1 The versions and their manuscripts The fluidity which characterises the reproduction of scholia has generated four different versions in the case of the scholia vetera to Sophocles’ Trachiniae. In the following, I offer a list of them and I provide essential information about the principal manuscripts which represent each. For detailed descriptions of the manuscripts the reader should consult the introductions to my edition of the Electra scholia vetera and Janz’s edition of the Philoctetes scholia.1 (i) Laurentian version L,2 Florence, Biblioteca Medicea-Laurenziana, plut. 32.9. Parchment, 309 x 212 mm., 264 ff. Mid-tenth century. Codex optimus. For a description and bibliography, see Xenis 2010, 26–8. Argument (from Apollodorus), dramatis personae, poetic text and scholia to the Trachiniae on ff. 64v – 79v. On f. 79v poem njșȜȠȚ ǧȡĮțȜȑȠȣȢ accompanied by a short list of the Labours in the left margin. Collated from Thompson-Jebb’s3 facsimile and verified by autopsy. ſ, Leiden, Universiteitsbibliotheek, Bibl. Publ. Graec. 60A. Palimpsest (Sophocles is the scriptio inferior), parchment, 220 x 160 mm., 147ff. Midtenth century. For a description and bibliography, see Xenis 2010, 28–9. From Trachiniae the manuscript preserves the Argument (from Apollodorus), dramatis personae, poetic text’s lines 1–8, 150–243, 385– 1126, 1175–278, and scholia thereon, the poem njƛƞơƜ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ accompanied by a short list of the Labours. Collated from the original. Lp, Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale de France, grec 2799. Paper, 229 x 166 mm., VI + 164 ff. Late fifteenth or early sixteenth century. For a description and bibliography, see Xenis 2010, 33–4. The scholia to Tra-

1 2 3

Xenis 2010 and Janz 2004. The nomenclature of manuscripts follows that of Turyn 1952. Thompson – Jebb 1885.

14

Introduction

chiniae appear on ff. 1r–19r. Collated from microfilm and verified by autopsy. Three copies of the Laurentian version are here dismissed from any consideration as having no independent value. Lp has been shown by Turyn to have two direct descendants: Ld,4 Parma, Biblioteca Palatina, Fondo Parmense 3176. Early sixteenth century (Eleuteri 1993, 87). Scholia to Trachiniae on ff. 134r – 149v. Turyn 1952, 186; 196–7. Janz 2004, 22. Lf, Florence, Biblioteca Laurenziana, Conventi Soppressi 142. Around 1500. Scholia to Trachiniae on ff. 45r–69v; argument (from Apollodorus) and poetic text on ff. 151r–181v. On f. 181v the poem njƛƞơƜ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ. Turyn 1952, 186–7; 197. From Lf is derived: Lr, Prague, Lobkovická Roudnická Knihovna, VI Fe 43. Fifteenth to sixteenth centuries (Olivier – Monégier du Sorbier 1983, 140). Scholia to Trachiniae on pp. 17–66. Turyn 1952, 186; 188; 197.5 (ii) Roman version M, Modena, Biblioteca Estense, Ɣ. Ƈ. 9.4. Paper, 223 x 160 mm., IV+199 ff. Fifteenth century. For a description and bibliography, see Xenis 2010, 44. Argument (from Apollodorus), dramatis personae and scholia to Trachiniae breaking off at sch. 112–3 on ff. 138v – 43v. No poetic text. Collated from the original. R, Vatican City, Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, gr. 2291. Paper, 312 x 215 mm., V+283ff. Fifteenth century. For a description and bibliography, see Xenis 2010, 42–4. Ff. 230v – 8v contain argument (from Apollodorus),

4 5

Ld is the symbol assigned to the manuscript by Janz 2004, 22. Turyn was not the first to argue for such an interrelation among Lp, Ld, Lf and Lr. He was preceded by de Marco who had reached the same conclusion about the affiliations of the three manuscripts but on the narrower base of the OC scholia (De Marco 1951, 3–6, on Lf – his symbol ƨ; 6–7, on Lr – his symbol l; 7–9, on Ld – his symbol Pa). Recently Janz confirmed Turyn’s position with regard to the Phil. scholia (Janz 2004, 34–6, on Ld and Lf as twin copies of Lp; 36–7, on Lr as apograph of Lf). I was not able to study Ld, Lf and Lr myself, but in regard to the readings of Lr, Ž derived some information from the reports of Papageorgiou who had used it for the establishment of his text of the scholia to the Trachiniae. I checked these readings against Lp and confirmed that they do indeed agree with it.

1 The versions and their manuscripts

15

dramatis personae, poetic text’s lines 1–372, and scholia to Trachiniae, which cease at sch. 360a2. Collated from microfilm. (iii) Triclinian version T, Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale de France, grec 2711. Paper, 298 x 195 mm., 262 ff. Mid to late fourteenth century. For a description and bibliography, see Janz 2004, 18–9 and Tessier 2005, xvii–xix. Argument (from Apollodorus), poem njƛƞơƜ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ, dramatis personae, poetic text and scholia to Trachiniae on ff. 193r – 225v. Collated from microfilm and verified by autopsy. Ta, Venice, Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana, graecus 470. Parchment, 345 x 240 mm., II + 302 ff. Fifteenth century. For a description and bibliography, see Janz 2004, 26 and Tessier 2005, xx–xxii. Argument (from Apollodorus), dramatis personae, poetic text, scholia to Trachiniae and poem njƛƞơƜ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ6 on ff. 221v – 39r. Collated from microfilm and verified by autopsy. (iv) a-version A, Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale de France, grec 2712. Parchment, 290 x 230 mm., 324 pp. Around 1300. Turyn 1949, 141. For a description and bibliography, see Janz 2004, 19. Argument (from Apollodorus), dramatis personae, poetic text and sparse scholia to Trachiniae on pp. 183–97. Collated from microfilm and verified by autopsy. U, Venice, Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana, graecus 467. Paper, 228 x 140 mm., IV + 336 ff. Around 1310. Turyn 1949, 141. For a description and bibliography, see Janz 2004, 25. Argument (from Apollodorus), dramatis personae, poetic text and sparse scholia to Trachiniae on ff. 246v – 288r. Collated from microfilm and verified by autopsy. Y, Vienna, Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, philosophicus – philologicus graecus 48. Paper, 300 x 215 mm., I + 118 ff. Fourteenth century. Turyn 1952, 173–6. For a description and bibliography, see Janz 2004, 27. Argument (from Apollodorus), dramatis personae, poetic text and sparse scholia to Trachiniae on ff. 84v – 99r. Collated from microfilm.

6

The poem appears untitled in Ta.

16

Introduction

The argument to the tragedy is also available in: V, Venice, Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana, graecus 468. Paper, 340 x 248 mm, I+190 ff. Around 1290. For a description and bibliography, see Xenis 2010, 40–1. Argument (from Apollodorus), dramatis personae, Trachiniae lines 1–18 on f. 142. No scholia. Collated from the original.

2 Characteristics of the versions and/ or affiliations of their manuscripts The Laurentian version: L ſ Lp The pattern of errors shows that ſ and Lp are codices gemelli and are derived from L.7 (i) ƀost of L’s errors recur in ſ and Lp:8 1a.3–5

1a.10 13a.3 7

8

ǎƢƜμƘƟƘʎƟ [ƗȰ]...ŭ ƢƔƣƘƧƞƔƕơƯμƘƟơƟ ƗȰ... ƾƟƔƩƫƣʀƥƔƜ sic textum refinxit Kruytbosch: ǎƢȱμƘƟƘ ƗȰ ..., ƢƔƣƘƧƞƔƕơƯμƘƟơƤ ƗȰ (ƗƐ om. Lp) ..., ƾƟƔƩƫƣʀƥƔƜ LLp: ǎƢƐμƘƜƟƘ ƗȰ ... ƝƔȴ ƢƔƣƘƧƞƔƕơƯμƘƟơƤ..., ƾƟƔƩƫƣʀƥƔƜ TTa: ǎƢƐμƘƟƘ (ȏƢƐμƘƟƘ R) ƗȰ ... ƢƔƣƘƧƞƔƕơƯμƘƟơƤ ƗȰ ... ƾƟƘƩưƣƚƥƘƟ MR: de ſ non constat ƢƣơƕƔƞơμƐƟơƧ Papageorgiou: ƢƣơƕƔƞƞơμƐƟơƧ LLp TTa MR: de ſ non constat ǒƝƕƔƞƞƘ AUY TTa: ǒƝƕƔƞƘƟ LLp

The relation of Lp to L is a question which has divided the opinions of scholars. De Marco (1951, 11–9) argued that in the OC scholia Lp is copied directly from L, and Turyn (1952, 185) generalised de Marco’s conclusion to cover all seven tragedies. I tested Turyn’s theory against the material supplied by the scholia to Electra and was able to verify it (Xenis 2010, 54–61). On the other hand, Janz advanced the view that Lp has independent value in the Philoctetes scholia, but the evidence he adduced for such a position is by no means satisfactory (Xenis 2010, 59–60). In fact, Lp can be considered to be an apograph of L in the Philoctetes scholia as well. As regards ſ, Christodoulou 1977 and Janz 2004 designate it as L’s twin, but again the evidence does not support such a description. ſ is a copy of L in the Ajax and Philoctetes scholia as well as in the Electra scholia: see Xenis 2010, 58–9. The table also includes the cases where either ſ or Lp are unavailable or illegible.

2 Characteristics of the versions and/ or affiliations of their manuscripts

20.1 (lm.)

39.2 40.3 46–7.4 48.1 69.1 101.1 104.1 119.3 122–3a.2 122–3b.1 140.3 151.1 151–2.1–3 160–3.1 160–3.2 161–2a1.1 172.4 173.1 (lm.) 188b.1–2 188b.1 188c.1–3 203–4.2 280b.2 305.1 352–5.6 379a.1

17

ad lm. ƘǮƤ ƾƖʬƟƔ ƦʭƗƘ ƥƧμƢƘƥȺƟ μƏƩƚƤ (v. 20) sch. rettuli: ad lm. ǿ ƝƞƘƜƟȶƤ ǤƞƛƘ źƚƟƮƤ (v. 19) adscripsit LLp: ad lm. ƩƣƮƟʪ ƗŪ ǎƟ ȏƥƦƐƣʪ μƐƟ (v. 18) R: lm. deest in TTa ƨƮƟơƟ ƇƇa MR et manus recentior in margine L: ƟƮμơƧ L: ƟƮμơƟ Lp ƗƐ ƦơƜ ƢƔƣƘƞƔƯƟƫ ex Hesiodo Brunck: ƗȰ ƢƔƣƘƞƔƯƟƫ MR: ƗŪ ǓƦơƜμơƜ (ǎƦơʎμơƜ Lp) ƢƔƣƘƞƔƯƟơμƘƟ LLp ƔȎƦȲƟ Lascaris: ƔȎƦȶƟ LLp: ƔȎƦʬƟ MR ǎƖƖƘƖƣƔμμƐƟơƟ TTa: ǎƖƖƘƖƣƔμμƐƟƚƟ LLp MR (lm.) ǂƣơƦơƟ TTa MR: ǂƣơƦƣơƟ LLp ǏʭƔ TTa: Ǔƫ LLp MR post ƢƘƣƜμȯƩƚƦơƟ habent ǎƢƜƣƣƚμƔƦƜƝʬƤ LLp R ǎƢƜƦƧƩʀ Lascaris: ǎƢƜƦƯƩƚƜ LLp: ǎƢƜƦƧƩƮƟƦƔ R ǎƣʬŭ Ʀȶ sic scripsit et interpunxit Papageorgiou: ǒƣƫƦƜ LLp R ǟƗƐƔ TTa: ǟ ƗȰ LLp R: ǟƗƘʎƔ Papageorgiou ƢƔƣơƣɲ ƦȶƟ ... ƢƔʎƗƔ T: ƢƔƣơƣɲ Ʀơʝ ... ƢƔƜƗȶƤ LLp R (ƔȎƦơʝ pro ǏƔƧƦơʝ praebet R) Ʀȶ ƟƐơƟ Neue: ƦȶƟ ƟƐơƟ Lſ ad vv. 151–2 scholium rettuli: ad v. 148 rettulerunt LLp TTa R lm. scripsi: ƟʝƟ ƗŪ ȟƤ ǒƦŪ ơȎƝ ȢƟ (ȢƟ om. ſ) (v. 161) LſLp: deest in TTaR; (ƟʝƟ ƗŪ ȟƤ n.) R ƢƣƮƟơƜƔƟ TTa: ƢƣơƟơƒɯ LLp R lm. scripsi: ƩƣƘʎŪ ɒ μƐƞƘƥƛƔƜ ƝƦʀƥƜƟ (ƝƦʀƥƜƟ om. ſ) LſLp: deest in R ƢƘƞƜơƯƤ scripsi: ƢơƞƜơȹƤ LſLp ƇƇa R: ƢƘƞƘƒơƧƤ Brunck1 ƟƔμƐƣƦƘƜƔ Lascaris: ƟƔμƘƣƦƘʎƔ LſLp: om. R haec separatim posui deleto Ǡ: cum sch. 188a coniunxerunt LſLp: scholio 188c continuant TTaR ƛƘƣơμƐƟʪ TTa: ƝƔƛƔƜƣơμƐƟʪ LſLp R haec separatim posuit R: cum sch. 118b copulaverunt LſLp (ǂƞƞƫƤ): cum sch. 118a copulavit TTa ƾƟƔƥƩȶƟ RLpp.c.: ƾƟƔƥƩȺƟ LLpa.c.: de ſ non constat: om. TTa ƾƟƘƝƦƜƝưƦƔƦơƟ AUY: ƾƟƘƝƦƮƦƔƦơƟ (-ƝƦƫ- R) LLp R: ƾƟƘƩƮμƘƟơƟ TTa lm. ex TTa: μƚƗŪ ƘDz ƦƜ ƗƣƏƥƘƜƤ LſLp: deest in R ŹȒƣƧƦơƤ Müller: ǺƨƜƦơƤ LLp TTa R lm. scripsi: Ǥ ƝƔȴ ƦȮ ƞƔμƢƣƏ LLp: deest in TTa

18

Introduction

434–5a.3 434–5b.3 503.2 510.1 520b.2 547.1 (lm.) 548–9a.1 548–9a.1–2 550–1.2 575.3 597 597.1 608.2 616.2 638.5 638.5 660a2.1 690a.1 694.1 694.2 695a.2 699.1 754.1 765–7.2 768.3 784.1 791a2.2 794a.2 794b.2 808.1 810.3 831–2.3 856c.1 883.1 (lm.) 883.3 905–6.1 931.1 939.3

ɒ Nauck: Ǡ LſLp ƨƜƞơƟƘƜƝƑƥƫ TTa: ƨƜƞơƟƘƜƝƑƥơƜ Lſ: ƨƜƞơƟƘƜƝƑƥƘƜ Lp; ƦƒƟƘƤ TTa: ƦƜƟȰƤ LLp ƃǮƟƜƏƗƔƜ Stiehle: ƃǮƟƒƔƜ LLp TTa ƔȎƦơȸƤ Heath: ƔȎƦȮƤ LLp TTa Ʀʁ μȰƟ Kruytbosch: ƦȲƟ μȰƟ LſLp lm. scripsi: ƦʬƟƗɺ ȏƢƘƝƦƣȱƢƘƜ ƢȷƗƔ Lſ Lp: deest in TTa ȥƟ, ƗƯơ ǟƞƜƝƜʬƟ locum refinxi: ȥƟ Ɨȹơ LſLp: ƦʬƟ ƗƯơ TTa ƾƢơƥƦȮƤ ƦʀƤ Lascaris: ƾƢơƥƦƏƦƚƤ LſLp ƝƔƦƔƝƚƞơʝƟ TTa: ƝƔƦƔƝƚƞơʝƟƦơƤ LſLp ad v. 597 sch. rettulit T: ad v. 596 LſLp ƢƣƏƥƥɾ T: ƢƣƏƥƥơƜ LſLp μƐƞƞƘƜ TTa: μƐƞƞơƜ LLp: de ſ non constat ƔȎƦơʎƤ TTa: ƔȎƦʭ Lſ Lp ƇƣƔƩƒƟ] ƇƣƔƩƒƚ LLp: de ſ non constat ǗƞƞƏƗơƤ Lascaris: ƇƣƔƩʎƟơƤ LſLp ǒƞƛơƜ T: ǒƞƛơƜƤ Lſ ƾƢȶ ƝƦƚƥȵơƧ ƇƇa: ƾƢơƝƦƜƝơƧ LſLp ƾƨƔƟʀ scripsi: ƾƨƔƟƐƤ LſLp ǒƩơƧƥƔƟ scripsi: ǒƩơƟ LſLpa.c.: ǒƩƫƟ Lpp.c. ƘǮƤ ƇTa: ȏƢȶ LſLp ƢƣȵƥμƔƦƜ Lascaris: ƢƣƒƥμƔƦơƤ LſLp: ƢƣƒƥμƔƦ TTa ƦȶƟ T: ƦʬƟ LLp ƾƟɿƘƜ T: ƾƟƒƘƜ Ta: ƾƟƘƒƚ LſLp ƟƘƔƣȮ ƝƮƞƞƚ Lascaris: ƟƘƔƣɱ ƝƮƞƞƚ LLp: ƟƘƔƣȮ ƝƮƞƞƔ TTa ſƒƩƔ Brunck (cf. gl. in TTa): ſƒƩơƧ LſLp ǎƟƗƔƦƘʎƥƛƔƜ Ƈ: ǎƟƗƔƦơʝƥƛƔƜ LſLp Ʀʭ ƥưμƔƦƜ Kruytbosch 49: Ʀơʝ ƥưμƔƦơƤ LſLp: ƦơʎƤ ȂμμƔƥƜ TTa ƔȎƦʭ scripsi: ƔȎƦȶƟ LſLp: possis etiam ƔȎƦȶƟ ƢơƜƟȲƟ T: ƢơƜƟȲ ǟ LſLp ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ Lp: ƾƟ (sic) Ʀơʝ Lſ ƦơʝƦơ Lascaris: ƦơƧ LſLp: om. TTa ƔǮƩμɲ Heath: ƔǵμƔ LLp ƦƏƟƗŪ ƔǮƩμƏƟ Lp: ƦɱƟƗɺ ƔǮƩμɱƟ Lſ ƢƣơƥƘƦƣƒƪƔƦơ Stephanus: ƢƣơƘƦƣƒƪƔƦơ LſLp ƘǮưƛƘƜ TTa: ƘDzƫƛƘ LſLp ƢƔƩƘʎƔƜ TTa: ƦƔƩƘʎƔƜ Lſ ƔȎƦʭ TTa: ƔȎƦȲƟ LLp

2 Characteristics of the versions and/ or affiliations of their manuscripts

19

959–61.1 995–6

ƖȮƣ scripsi: ƦƜ Lſ: ƦơƜ Lp sch. ad v. 995–6 adscripsit Wolff: ad v. 994 LſLp: lm. deest in TTa 1003a.2 ƛƘƣƔƢƘƯƥơƟƦƔ TTa: ƛƘƣƔƢƘƯƥƔƟƦƔ LſLp 1009a.2 ƾƟƐƦƣƘƪƔƤ Lascaris: ƾƟƔƦƣƐƪƔƤ LLp: de ſ non constat 1089–90.1 lm. Ȥ ƩƐƣƘƤ – ƕƣƔƩƒơƟƘƤ scripsi: Ȥ ƟʬƦƔ ƝƔȴ ƥƦƐƣƟƔ LſLp: deest in TTa ǑƟ Stephanus: ǓƟƔ LſLp: om. TTa 1089–90.1 1093a et 1093b1 separatim praebent TTa: coniunguntur in LſLp 1093b1.2 ȁ Stephanus: ȁƟ LſLp TTa 1109.1 lm. ƝƾƝ ƦʬƟƗƘ scripsit Bernardakis: ƝǀƟ Ʀȶ μƚƗȰƟ Ȥ | ƝǀƟ μƚƗȰƟ ǓƣƢƫ (vv. 1107–8) LſLp: deest in Ƈ Ʀʁ ... ƾƗƜƝƚƥƏƥɾ scripsi: ƦȲƟ ... ƾƗƜƝƑƥƔƥƔƟ LLp TTa 1118.4 1126.2 μȲ ƗƐơƟ Papageorgiou: μƚƗȰƟ LLp: μȲ ƗȰ TTa 1131.2 ƗƧƥƨƑμƫƟ Hermann: ƗƧƥƨƚμʬƟ LLp: ƗƧƥƨƚμƜʬƟ TTa 1167b.1–2 hanc annotationem ut novum scholium praebent TTa: in initio sch. 1167a legitur in LLp ƢƔƣơƠƯƟɾƤ O. Hensius: ƢƔƣơƠƧƟƘʎƤ LſLp 1176a1.1 1190b hoc scholium separatim posui: cum sch. 1190a coniungitur in LſLp 1192.1 ƗƘʎ add. Stephanus ex Turnebo: om. LſLp 1235–6.2 ƛƘƚƞƔƥƒƔƤ ƇƇa: ǞƞƔƥƒƔƤ LLp 1245.1–2 ƢƣȶƤ – fin. h.l. transposui: post sch. 1247.2 ǶƮƞɾ demigraverunt in LſLp: ut sui iuris scholium praebet TTa omissis verbis ƢƣȶƤ ȁƟ ȃƦƜ 1253.1 ȟƤ TTa: ȟƤ ƢƣȴƟ Lſ 1259.4 ƥƘƔƧƦʀƤ TTa: ƥƘƔƧƦơʝ LLp: de ſ non constat 1259.5 ƝƘƝơƞƞƚμƐƟơƟ TTa: ƝƘƝơƞƞƚμƐƟơƧ LſLp 1262.1 ƘǮƤ TTa: om. LſLp 1275.3 ǎƢƔƟƐƞƛƫƥƜƟ AUY: ǎƢƐƞƛƫƥƜƟ LLp (ii) However either ſ or Lp or both improve on L in the following places: 160–3.3 344.3 374.1 550–1.1 556b.2 584–7.3 594.2 616.1 742–3.5

ƢơƜƑƥƫμƔƜ TTaR Lp: ƢơƜƑƥơμƔƜ L: de ſ non constat ƦȶƟ TTaRLp: ƦȲƟ L ƝƘƩƔƣƜƥμƐƟƔ TTa Lp: ƝƘƩƫƣƜƥμƐƟƔ L ǿ ƢƮƥƜƤ Lascaris: Ʀȶ ƢƮƥƜƤ Lp: ǟ ƢƮƥƜƤ Lſ ƔȎƦʭ ƇLp: ƔȎƦȶ L: de ſ non constat ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ TTa Lp: ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƤ Lſ; ƢơƣƘƧƮμƘƟơƟ TTa et ſLp: ƢơƣƘƧƥƮμƘƟơƟ L ƢƣơƥȳƝƫƟ TTa Lp: ƢƣơƥʀƝơƟ L: de ſ non constat ƛȱμƘƟ TTa Lp: ƛƐμƘƟƔƜ Lſ

20

Introduction

788.3 810.3 815.1 831–2.2 839–40.2 856d.2 883.1 (lm.) 1091.2 1167a.13 1247.2 1259.1 (lm.) 1259.3

ơDZ TLp: ơǵơƜ Lſ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ Lp: ƾƟ Ʀơʝ (sic) Lſ ǎƢƜƢƟƘƯƥƘƜƘƟ AUY TTa Lp: ǎƢƜƢƟƘƯƥƘƜ L ǟ (alt.) Lp: Ǡ L: om. TTa: de ſ non constat ƁƐƥơƧ TTa Lp: ƁƮƥơƧ L ƦƏƟƗƘ T Lp: ƦɱƟƗƘ L ƦƏƟƗŪ ƔǮƩμƏƟ Lp: ƦɱƟƗɺ ƔǮƩμɱƟ Lſ ƁƘμƐƔƟ Lp: ƟƘμƔƒƔƟ Lſ ǒƞƛɾƥƜ Lp: ǒƞƛɾ L: dzƝơƜƦơ TTa μƘ ſLp: μƔƜ L ƦƑƟƗŪ ſLp: ƦʀƟƗŪ L: lm. deest in TTa ƦƑƟƗƘ TTaLpſ: ƦʀƟƗƘ L

All of these good readings could easily be explained by saying that the scribe of Lp or ſ corrected on his own initiative an obvious error which he found in L. For example at sch. 594.2 the correct ƢơƣƘƧƮμƘƟơƟ can easily be restored from the context or can be considered a happy case of haplography, since ƥ and ơ look alike in L’s palaeographical style. Or, at sch. 374.1 the correction may have been suggested to the scribe by sch. 484.2. The least obvious errors occur at sch. 1167a.13 and 742–3.5. The reading at 1167a.13 is a conjecture of the eminent scholar Marcus Musurus, the scribe of Lp,9 based on considerations of metre, whereas that at sch. 742–3.5 in the same manuscript he may more probably have borrowed from a manuscript of Pindar. So the items in the above table are certainly inadequate to establish ſ’s or Lp’s independence from L.10 The two manuscripts have no value except, in the case of ſ, as evidence for L’s own readings where these are unclear (there are some such instances in the Argument of the Trachiniae) or, in the case of Lp, as source of conjecture.11 9 See Xenis 2010, 33–4. 10 Musurus also made a number of deliberate modifications in Lp. There follows a selection from the Prologue: 4.2 ƗƜȱƖƟƫƝƔ L R: ǒƖƟƫƝƔ Ƈ: ƗƜƐƖƟƫƟ Lp; 36.2 Ȣƨƛƚ L MR: ƘȏƣƐƛƚ Lp; 48.1 ƘȒƩơμƔƜ L MR: ƘȒƩơμƔƜ ƦơʎƤ ƛƘơʎƤ Lp TTa; 54.1–2 ǤƥƔƟ ƖȮƣ ƔȎƦʁ ƢƔʎƗƘƤ ǎƠ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ L MR: ȃƦƜ (ƝƔȴ Ƈa) ƢƔʎƗƘƤ ǤƥƔƟ ƔȎƦʁ ǎƠ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ TTa: ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ ƢƔʎƗƘƤ ǎƠ ƔȎƦʀƤ Lp. 11 There are also some disagreements between ſ and L in respect of lemmata. ſ supplies a longer lemma in sch. 608 (ƢƣȴƟ ƝƘʎƟơƤ ƔȎƦƮƟ), and shorter ones in about twenty six scholia, e.g. at sch. 160–3 (ƟʝƟ Ɨ’ ȟƤ ǒƦ’ ơȎƝ) 161–2a1 (ƩƣƘʎ’ ɒ μƐƞƘƥƛƔƜ); 203–4(ȟƤ ǂƘƞƢƦơƟ Ȃμμ’ ǎμơƒ); 239 (ƘȎƝƦƔʎƔ ƨƔƒƟƫƟ). In three instances ſ supplies lemmata where L has none. In two of them, however, L has a symbol: sch. 931; 932 (ǒƖƟƫ s.) L; 1190a (ơȎ μƑ s.) L. But evidence based on lemmata is in most cases inconclusive as a means of ascertaining manuscript affiliations: see Xenis 2010, 58.

2 Characteristics of the versions and/ or affiliations of their manuscripts

21

(iii) That ſ and Lp are twins is demonstrated by the fact that each is marked by a number of separative errors: ſ’s separative errors: 172.1 181.2 230a2.1 460.2 602b.1 1058a.1 1082.1 1176a1.1 1268.2 1275.2–3

ŸƫƗưƟɾ LLp TTa: ŸƫƗưƟƜ ſR ƗŪ dzƢƢƫƟ habet L: om. ſ ƾƟƦȴ habet L: om. ſ džƞƘơʝ Papageorgiou: džƞƐơƧ LLp TTa: ŵȎƞƘơʝ ſ ƞƘƢƦơƭƨʀ LLp: ƞƘƢƦơƭƨʁ ſ (lm.) ƝơȎ ƦƔʝƦƔ LLp : ơȎ ƔȎƦƏ ſ: deest in TTa ǎƠƘƢƯƣƫƥƐƟ LLpTTa: ǎƠƘƢƞƑƣƫƥƐƟ ſ ƾƢƘƜƛƑƥƔƤ (-ƢƜ- Lp) μơƜ LLp: ƾƢƘƜƛƑƥƔƥƛƔƜ ſ ǟƖƘʎƥƛƘ LLp TTa: ǟƖƘʎƥƛƔƜ ſ ǓƫƤ ǀƟ ǎƢƐƞƛƫƥƜƟ ƾƢȶ ƦʀƤ ƢƧƣɱƤ habet LLp: om. ſ12

There is a very long list of errors appearing exclusively in Lp.13 It is sufficient to cite a selection: 1a.3 1a.6 7b.1–2 20.2 153.2 217b2.2 223.1–2 230–1.1 449.3 974.1 1259.4 1262.1

ƿƪƒƝơƣơƟ L TTa MR: ȏƪƒƝơƣơƟ Lp: de ſ non constat ƗƘƒƝƟƧƥƜ (ƔȎƦʭ add. MR) ƢƏƟƦƔ ƦȶƟ ƢƞơʝƦơƟ habent L TTa MR: om. Lp: de ſ non constat ƝƔȴ μƟƚƥƦƘƧμƏƦƫƟ habent L T MR: om. Lp ƔȎƦȲƟ ƗưƥƘƜƟ L T R: ƢƔƣƔƗưƥƘƜƟ Lp: om. Ta ƾƢƫƗƧƣƏμƚƟ Lſ: ǎƢƫƗƧƣƏμƚƟ Lp ǾƣƩơʝƟƦƔƜ Lſ: ǾƣƛơʝƟƦƔƜ Lp: ǾƣƩƘʎƦƔƜ TTa Ǡ ƾƟƦƜƢƣƮƥƫƢƔ Lſ TTa R: ƝƾƟƦƜƢƣƮƥƫƢƔ Lp ƢƣơƥƨƫƟƚμƏƦƫƟ Lſ ƇƇa R: ƢƣơƥƝƧƟƚμƏƦƫƟ Lp ƛƘƞƑƥɾƤ Lſ TTa: ƛƐƞɾƤ Lp Ʀʭ ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ habet Lſ TTa: om. Lp ǎμƨƣƔƖʀƟƔƜ Lſ TTa: ǎμƨƣƔƖƒƥƔƜ Lp ƾƟȯƢƔƧƥơƟ (ƾƟƏƢƔƧƘ TTa) ƦȲƟ ƕơȲƟ habent Lſ TTa: om. Lp

We can now describe L as the archetype of the Laurentian version. ſ and L derive from L and need not be taken systematically into consideration.

12 There is also a very great number of scholia which are available in L but absent from ſ. 13 Lp’s errors are of course shared with Lf and Lr, since, as it has been noted on p. 14 with n. 5, Lp was the model of Lf and Lf was the model of Lr.

22

Introduction

The Roman version: M R Since the distinctive features of the Roman version and the date which we can assign to it are questions that have already been dealt with in detail,14 we may immediately move on to examine the affiliations between the two manuscripts which represent it. The affiliations of M and R in the scholia vetera to Trachiniae will be shown to follow those obtaining between the two manuscripts in the scholia to Electra, Ajax, Philoctetes and Oedipus

Coloneus.15

M and R agree in error against the rest of the tradition:16 1a.2 1a.3 1a.17 13b.2 21b.3 21b.4 46–7.2 46–7.4 48.2 71.1 79.2 79.2 82.1

ƔǮƦƑƥƔƥƛƔƜ om. MR ƗƘƗƜƮƦƔ] ƗƜƗƜƮƦƔ, sic MR ȏƢȶ žƯƣơƧ om. MR ȟƤ om. MR ǎƝƏƛƚƦơ om. MR ǒƟƛƔ ƝƘƟ] ǒƟƛƔƝơƤ MR ȟƤ om. MR ƾƟƔƖƟơʝƥƔƟ] ƾƟƔƖƟơʝƥƔ MR ƞƔƕƘʎƟ] ƞƫƕƘʎƟ MR ƦơƒƟƧƟ] ƢƏƟƧ MR Ǡ] ƘǮ MR ƘȎƗƔƜμơƟƑƥƫ] ƘȎƗƔƜμơƟƒƥƫ MR ƠƧƣơʝ] Ơƚƣơʝ MR

M is alone in error at: 1a.2 1a.8 1a.9 1a.10 1a.12 1a.12 1a.19 7b.4

ƆƮƞƫƟƔ] ƆƮƞơƟơƤ M ƘȎƗƔƜμơƟƐƥƦƘƣơƤ] ƘȎƗƔƜμơƟƐƥƦƘƣơƟ M žƞƐơƕƜƟ] žƞƮơƕƜƟ M ƨƐƣơƟƦƔ om. M ƾƢƘƨƑƟƔƦơ] ǎƢƘƨƑƟƔƦơ M ƕƒơƧ] ƕơƒơƧ M ȃƛƘƟ] ȃƥƛƘƟ M ȂƦƞơƟ] ȃƢƞơƟ M

14 Xenis 2010, 44–8. 15 Xenis 2010, 62–4, with further bibliography, but see also Xenis 2010, 65–6. 16 For the compilation of the lists in this section I use readings which may reasonably be supposed to have come to MR from their base text, i.e. the Laurentian copy which served as the basis for the revision.

2 Characteristics of the versions and/ or affiliations of their manuscripts

13a.4 26.3 26.4 36.2 46–7.3 54.2 56–7.4 69.1 79.1 82.1 92.1 94.1 107–8.2 112–3.2

23

ƥƩƒƙơƧƥƜ] ƥƩƒƙơƧƥƔ M ȃƦƜ] ơȓƦƫ M ƾƢơƧƥƒƔƟ] ǂƖơƧƥƔƟ M ȏƢƐƣƦƘƣơƤ] ȏƢƐƣƦƘƣơƟ M ƦơƥơƯƦơƧ] Ʀȶ Ʀơʝ M ǒƥƦƜ] ǒƦƜ M ƗƜƔƢƣƏƦƦƘƥƛƔƜ] ƗƜƔƦƣƏƢƦƘƥƛƔƜ M ƾƣơƦƣƜɱƦƔƜ] ƾƣƫƦƣƜɱƦƔƜ M ƦƘƛƟƑƠơμƔƜ] ƦƘƛƟƑƙơμƔƜ M ƝƜƟƗƯƟʪ] ƝƧƟƗƯƟʪ M Ʀȶ] ƦȲ M ƢơƜƝƒƞƚ] ƢơƜƝƑƞƚ M μƟƚμơƟƘƯơƧƥƔƟ] μƟƚμơƟƘƯƥƔƟ M ƢƟƐơƟƦơƤ] ƢƞƐơƟƦơƤ M

R is alone in error at: 7b.3 21a.1 21b.2 21b.2 21b.2 64.1 74.1 74.1 82.2

dzƢƢƫƟ] dzƢƢơƟ R ǎƞƘƧƛƘƣơʎ] ǎƞƘƧƛƘƣƘʎ R ƗƜƘƒƢơƜμƜ] ƗȰ ƘDzƢơƜμƜ R ƘDzƢơƜ om. R ǂƨơƕơƤ] ǂƨƫƟơƤ R μơƜ om. R ƝƔȴ om. R żƘƥƥƔƞƒƔƤ] żƘƥƥƔƞƒơƧƤ R ƢơƣƘƯƥɾ] ƢơƣƘƯƥʪ R

M and R are, then, codices gemelli stemming from a common ancestor which will be designated r.17 That r was a very badly damaged manuscript is explicitly mentioned by the scribe of M on f. 143v (after the final sch. 112–3): ǎƟƦƔʝƛƔ ƞƘƒƢơƧƥƜ ƦȮ ƥƩƮƞƜƔ ȃƦƜ ƢƔƞƔƜȶƟ ƝƔȴ ƥƩƘƗȶƟ ƥƘƥƚƢƫμƐƟơƟ (-μƐƟơƟ ƀp.c.: -μƐƟƫƟ Ma.c.) ǤƟ Ʀȶ ƕƜƕƞƒơƟ ǢƖơƧƟ Ʀȶ ƢƣơƦƮƦƧƢơƟ (sic pro ƢƣƫƦƮ-). 17 There are strong connections between r and V in the argument to the play, i.e. in the portion of the material for which V is available: arg.1 tit.; arg.17 ǥƝƘƟ] ǤƞƛƘƟ aT: ƾƟʀƞƛƘƟ Vrr; arg. 19 ƔȎƦȶƤ μȰƟ ǿ] ƔȎƦȶƤ μȰƟ ơȔƟ a: ƔȎƦȶƤ μȰƟ ơȔƟ ǿ Vrr: ƝƔȴ ƔȎƦȶƤ μȰƟ ǿ T; arg.24–5 ƘǮ - ƝƮƩƞơƧ om. Vrr; arg. 42 Ɨ' džƣƝȯƗƫƟ ƔȎƦʭ] ƗȰ ƔȎƦʭ džƣƝȯƗƫƟ Vrr; arg. 46 ƔǯƣƘʎ aT: ƔDzƣƘƜ L: ƔǯƣƘʎ (ƔǮ- ƀ) ƝƔȴ Vrr; arg. 47–8 ǻƢƢƔƥơƟ – ƀȱƞƔƟƔ om. Vrr; arg. 59 ƢƔʎƤ om. Vrr. The two manuscripts may be supposed to go back to the same ancestor. For the details see Xenis 2010, 67ff.

24

Introduction

What is the contribution of the Roman version to the establishment of the Laurentian version? Is it possible to retrieve any good material from 1r, that is the now lost Laurentian copy which served as the basis for the revision in r? Unfortunately, r has preserved correct readings of its model far less often here than it has in the scholia to the other Sophoclean plays: 40.3 117b2 188c 217b1

Ɨȱ ƦơƜ ƢƔƣƘƞƔȹƟƫ ex Hesiodo Brunck: ƗȰ ƢƔƣƘƞƔƯƟƫ MR: ƗѴ ǒƦơƜμơƜ ƢƔƣƘƞƔƯƟơμƘƟ L hoc sch. separatim praebet post sch. 119 R: cum sch. 117b1 coniunxit L (ǂƞƞơƤ ƦƣƐƨƘƜ sic pro ǂƞƞƫƤ ƦƣƐƨƘƜ): cum sch. 116 copulavit T (ƦƣƐƨƘƜ ƗȰ) hoc sch. separatim posuit R: cum sch. 188b copulavit L (ǂƞƞƫƤ): cum sch. 188a copulavit T hoc sch. separatim post sch. 218 praebet R: cum sch. 217a coniunxit L (ǂƞƞƫƤ)

To be sure, the first case is questionable. In sch. 102a MR differ from L in offering a longer quotation from the Iliad. As the extra words are obviously inappropriate to the context, they are likely to be a gratuitous addition on the part of the scribe rather than preservation of pristine material lost to L. On the analogy of this, it may be right to say that the situation in sch. 40.3 is a scribal interference. Here, we should add a case in which MR do not give us the truth but point us in its direction. In sch. 7b.4, between the words ƦƔƞƔƜƢƫƣƒƔƟ and žƔƞƞƒμƔƩơƤ, L gives a phrase which breaks the smooth sequence of thought. On the other hand, MR omit this phrase. It may be supposed that it stood independently as a separate scholion in the archetype. Then, L conflated it with sch. 7b, whereas MR left it out. In total, then, there are only four cases in which L is wrong and MR are right or help us to find the truth. However, it is not to be forgotten that in the other plays, where the Roman version provides us with the complete corpus of the scholia vetera, we find ample evidence for its independence from L. It is not unwise, therefore, to treat the matter likewise in the Trachiniae scholia and trace the above good readings to a true line of inheritance from antiquity independently of L. That MR here scarcely contain any truth which is not in L may be the result of the serious damage in r and, consequently, the small number of scholia which M and R could copy from it.

2 Characteristics of the versions and/ or affiliations of their manuscripts

25

The a-version: A U Y A, U and Y in the Philoctetes scholia have been recently studied by Janz18 and have been found to be codices ‘gemelli’ descending from a lost common ancestor a. A, U and Y behave in the Trachiniae scholia in exactly the same way: (i) Errors common to all three: 214.1 1275.1

ƦƔʎƤ ƩƘƣƥƒ om. AYU ƾƢơƥƦƣƔƨƘȴƤ] ǎƢƜƥƦƣƔƨƘȴƤ AUY

(ii) Errors peculiar to A: 71.2 467–8.2 548–9b.2 614.2 673.1–2 815.2

post ȆμƨƏƞɾ add. Ɩʁ ŵ ǎƣƣƒƨƛƫ, ƨƚƥƒƟ] ƨƚƥƒƟ, ǎƣƣƒƨƛƫ, ƨƚƥƒƟ ŵ Ʀơʝ ƾƟƗƣȶƤ om. A ȂμμƔ] ȂƟơμƔ ŵ ƦƜƤ ǎƞƢƒƙơƜ] ƦƜƤ ǎƞƢƒƙƘƜ U: ƦƜ ǎƞƢƜƙƮμƘƟơƟ ŵ ƾƢƜơƯƥɾ] ǎƢƜơƯƥɾ ŵ

(iii) Errors peculiar to Y: arg. tit. 614.1 678a.2

om. Y ƘȒƖƟƫƥƦơƟ] ǂƖƟƫƥƦơƟ Y ƝƔƦƔƦƑƝƘƦƔƜ] ƝƔƦƔƦƚƝƐƟƔƜ Y

(iv) Errors peculiar to U: 548–9b.3 673.1–2

ƢƣƘƥƕƧƦƐƣƫƟ] ƢƣƘƥƕƧƦƒƗƫƟ U ƦƜƤ ǎƞƢƒƙơƜ Y: ƦƜƤ ǎƞƢƒƙƘƜ U: ƦƜ ǎƞƢƜƙƮμƘƟơƟ ŵ

On the basis of thirteen readings of AUY, Janz draws the conclusion that a ‘derived its paratextual material from a source independent of the other witnesses which have come down to us, and of L in particular’ and thus ‘must be considered a genuine, independent witness to the “old” scholia, alongside l and r’.19 On the contrary, De Marco who examined A for his 18 Janz 2004, 56–60. 19 Janz 2004, 75. Janz uses l to denote the common ancestor of L and ſ, which he considers as L’s twin. However, as I have shown, ſ is in fact a copy of L; see 16–21.

26

Introduction

edition of the OC scholia, thought that the few good readings he found in A should be better explained as products of conjecture.20 In what follows I shall show that the scribe of a did have the necessary critical acumen to devise the good readings which appear in this version, and therefore that De Marco’s position claims higher probability than that of Janz. To do this I shall consider his methods of crafting his own version out of the scholiastic material that had come down to him. First of all it should be noted, by way of a general description, that this version contains only few of the items which appear in L. What is also true is that these items appear severely abbreviated or modified in other ways. The method of abridgement varies. It may consist of omitting items which repeat an idea or which can be left implied. Two examples: 703a1+aa2 ƢơƦơʝ : Ʀơʝ ƖƞƘƯƝơƧƤ Ʀơʝ ƾƣƦƒƫƤ ǎƝƢƜƔƥƛƐƟƦơƤ. ƖƞƔƧƝʀƤ ƗȰ ǾƢưƣƔƤ ƦȶƟ ƟƐơƟ ơǴƟơƟ ƗƜȮ ƦȲƟ ƞƔμƢƣƮƦƚƦƔ. ŵUY 1 lm. deest in A Ʀơʝ ƖƞƘƯƝơƧƤ] ƾƢȶ Ʀ. Ɩ. A

ǎƝƢƜƔƥƛƐƟƦơƤ] ǎƝƢƜƔƟƛƐƟƦơƤ UY

723 ƦƔƣƕƘʎƟ μƐƟ : ƾƟƏƖƝƚ μȰƟ ƘȎƞƔƕƘʎƥƛƔƜ ƦȮ ƗƘƜƟȮ ǒƣƖƔ. ơȎ ƩƣȲ ƗȰ Ƣƣȶ ƦʀƤ ǎƝƕƏƥƘƫƤ ƔǯƣƘʎƥƛƔƜ ƦȮ ƗƘƜƟƏ. ŵUY 1 lm. deest in U

In the first case, he did not copy ƝƔȴ ƟƐơƧ after Ʀơʝ ƾƣƦƒƫƤ ǎƝƢƜƔƥƛƐƟƦơƤ nor ƘǴƢƘƟ after ơǴƟơƟ, and in the second, the phrase ƝƔȴ ƦʬƟ ƥƧμƕƚƥơμƐƟƫƟ, which is a synonym to the preceding ǎƝƕƏƥƘƫƤ, is not reproduced. Elsewhere the scribe keeps just the material that amounts to a word for word paraphrase of the poetical text and excludes everything else. More specifically, he is not concerned to explain why Sophocles used the expression ƢƘƜƛơʝƤ ƢƐƢƞʪ in 661: 660a1 ƢƔƟƏμƘƣơƤ : ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƦȲƟ ƥƑμƘƣơƟ ǟμƐƣƔƟ Ʀʭ ƢƐƢƞʪ ƦʀƤ ƢƘƜƛơʝƤ ƛƘƞƩƛƘȴƤ ǎƝ ƢƣơƨƏƥƘƫƤ ƦʀƤ ƁƐƥƥơƧ ƝƔƦƘƥƝƘƧƔƥμƐƟʪ. ŵUY 1 ƦȲƟ om. A

20 De Marco, 1951, 21.

2 Characteristics of the versions and/ or affiliations of their manuscripts

27

nor to explain why the ǗƞƞƏƟƫƟ ƾƖơƣƔƒ mentioned in 638 are called ƄƧƞƏƦƜƗƘƤ: 638 ǎƟƛŪ ǗƞƞƏƟƫƟ : ȃƢơƧ ƥƧƟƏƖơƟƦƔƜ ơǯ džμƨƜƝƦƧƮƟƘƤ ƘǮƤ ƦȲƟ ƞƘƖơμƐƟƚƟ ƄƧƞƔƒƔƟ. AUY 1 lm. deest in U

He does not cite differing opinions about the geographical location of ƢƘƦƣƔʎƔ ƛƘƣμȮ ƞơƧƦƣƏ, but may be thought to choose what he himself takes to be the correct one: 633a2+bb1 Ȥ ƟƔƯƞơƩƔ : ƢƔƣƔƛƔƞƏƦƦƜƔ ƞơƧƦƣƏ. ƨƚƥȴ ƗȰ ƦȮ ǧƣƏƝƞƘƜƔ ǃƢƘƣ ƞƐƖƘƦƔƜ ƔȎƦʭ ǟ ǫƣƔ ƾƟƘʎƟƔƜ. ƢƘƦƣƔʎƔ ƗȰ ƗƜȮ Ʀȶ ǎƟ ȂƣƘƜ Ʀʁ ƃDzƦɾ ƝƘʎƥƛƔƜ. AUY 1 lm. deest in U ƗȰ om. A

nor does he quote Hesiod in sch. 56–7 or Pindar in sch. 742–3: 56–7 ƦƒƟŪ ȢƣƔƟ : ƨƣơƟƦƒƗƔ ȏƢȰƣ Ʀơʝ ƝƔƞʬƤ ƗơƝƘʎƟ ƗƜƔƢƣƏƦƦƘƥƛƔƜ. AUY 1 lm. deest in U

742–3 ƨƔƟƛƐƟ : Ʀȶ ǃƢƔƠ ƢƣƔƩƛȰƟ ƢʬƤ ǂƟ ƦƜƤ μȲ ƖƘƟƐƥƛƔƜ ƢơƜƑƥƘƜƘƟ; AUY 1 lm.] Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ ƨƔƟƛƐƟ Y: deest in U

To make the scholion fit the poetic text perfectly, he leaves out ǒƞƛơƜ in sch. 660a1, because this word belongs to the section coming before the sentence he wants to paraphrase:

28

Introduction

660a1 ƢƔƟƏμƘƣơƤ : ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƦȲƟ ƥƑμƘƣơƟ ǟμƐƣƔƟ Ʀʭ ƢƐƢƞʪ ƦʀƤ ƢƘƜƛơʝƤ ƛƘƞƩƛƘȴƤ ǎƝ ƢƣơƨƏƥƘƫƤ ƦʀƤ ƁƐƥƥơƧ ƝƔƦƘƥƝƘƧƔƥμƐƟʪ. ŵUY However, he paraphrases as well as offers a minimum of interpretation in e.g. 678a ƝƔȴ ƪʁ : ƝƔƦƔƦƑƝƘƦƔƜ, ƨƚƥƒ, ƝƔȴ ƗƜƔƣƣƘʎ ƾƢȶ Ʀơʝ ƞƒƛơƧ. ƦơʝƦơ ƗƐ ƨƚƥƜƟ ȟƤ ǎƢȴ ƞƒƛơƧ ƔȎƦȶ ƝƔƦƔƛƘμƐƟƚ. AUY 1 ƝƔƦƔƦƑƝƘƦƔƜ] ƝƔƦƔƦƚƝƐƟƔƜ Y

or in 572 ƾμƨƒƛƣƘƢƦơƟ : ƢƘƢƚƖƮƤŭ ƛƣƐƪƔƜ ƖȮƣ Ʀȶ ƢʀƠƔƜ. AUY 1 lm. deest in U

It is only in very few instances that he offers solely interpretation: 801 ƾƞƞƏ μŪ ǎƝ ƖʀƤ : ƔǮƥƩƯƟƘƦƔƜ ƖȮƣ ƔȎƦơʝ ƛƔƟƘʎƟ μȲ ƖƘƞƔƥƛʁ ȏƢȶ ƦʬƟ ƃǮƩƔƞƒƫƟ. ŵUƈ 1 lm. deest in U

So far we have been considering his abbreviation procedure, but there are some cases where the scribe practises modification of scholia too. It has to be stressed however that this form of conscious alteration is not one which found much favour with our scribe. He is seen to replace words with synonyms or modify the wording on a larger scale; he sometimes changes the syntax too: 71 ƢɱƟ ƦơƒƟƧƟ : ƢɱƟ ȂƟƘƜƗơƤ ƾƝơƯƥơμƘƟ, ƘǮ ƝƔȴ ȏƢƐƥƦƚ Ʀȶ ƗơƧƞƘƯƘƜƟ Ʀʁ ȆμƨƏƞɾ ǿ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ. ŵUY 1 lm. deest in U

2 post ȆμƨƏƞɾ add. Ɩʁ ŵ

2 Characteristics of the versions and/ or affiliations of their manuscripts

29

801 ƾƞƞƏ μŪ ǎƝ ƖʀƤ : ƔǮƥƩƯƟƘƦƔƜ ƖȮƣ ƔȎƦơʝ ƛƔƟƘʎƟ μȲ ƖƘƞƔƥƛʁ ȏƢȶ ƦʬƟ ƃǮƩƔƞƒƫƟ. ŵUƈ 1 lm. deest in U

He provides the synonyms ƨƞơƖƮƤ (AUY), ƦƘƞƐƥƔƤ (AUY), ƾƞƑƛƘƜƔ (AUY) to replace arg.59 ƢƧƣɱƤ, 36.2 ƝƔƦơƣƛưƥƔƤ, 425.1 ƾƞƚƛȲƤ ƞƮƖơƤ (AUY) respectively. Conflation is the third kind of scribal interference attested in a scholia. Excerpts belonging to sch. 230a1 and 230a2 or to sch. 1058a and 1058b are brought together to create conflated entities: 230 ƝƔƦŪ ǒƣƖơƧ ƝƦʀƥƜƟ : ƝƔƦȮ ƦȲƟ ƾƢƔƖƖƘƞƒƔƟ Ǡ ƝƦʀƥƜƟ ƦȲƟ ƢƣɱƠƜƟ. ƦơƧƦƐƥƦƜƟ ƾƠƒƫƤ ƦʀƤ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ ƾƣƘƦʀƤ ƢƣơƥƨƫƟơƯμƘƛƔ. ŵUY 1 lm. deest in U

1058 ƢƘƗƜƏƤ : ǟ ǎƟ ƢƘƙơμƔƩƒɯ Ǡ ǟ ǎƟ ƢƘƗƒʪ ƕƔƞƞơμƐƟƚ ŵUY 1 ǟ (alt.) om. A

Another instance is the combination of sch. 815 and sch. 817a which has also the feature of modification and shows the scribe’s attempt to paraphrase the poetic text:

ơȔƣơƤ ǾƨƛƔƞμʬƟ : ƘDzƛƘ ơȔƣơƤ ƝƔƞȶƤ ǎƢƜƢƟƘƯƥƘƜƘƟ ƔȎƦʁ ƾƢƜơƯƥɾ, dzƟƔ μƚƝƐƦƜ ƔȎƦȲƟ DzƗơƜμƜ. Ʀƒ ƖȮƣ ƗƘʎ μƏƦƚƟ ǎƢƔƒƣƘƥƛƔƜ Ʀʭ ƦʀƤ μƚƦƣƮƤ ǾƟƮμƔƦƜ; ŵUƈ 1 lm. deest in U ƾƢƜơƯƥɾ] ǎƢƜơƯƥɾ ŵ

Furthermore: 905b2+9 905–6 ǾƣƖƏƟƫƟ : Ǣ ƦʬƟ ǯƥƦơƧƣƖƜƝʬƟ Ǡ μƘƛŪ ȥƟ ƦȶƟ ƩƜƦʬƟƔ ǒƩƣƜƥƘƟ. Ǡ ƿƢƞʬƤ ƢɱƟ ȂƣƖƔƟơƟ ȁ ƥƧƟƮƟƦơƤ Ʀơʝ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ μƘƦƘƩƘƜƣƒƙƘƦơ. ŵUY

30

Introduction

We have traced in some detail the course which the scribe takes in rewriting the scholia, for it can be used as a means to measure the standard of his capacities. What has been clear is that his methods of abridgement, modification and conflation are very sensible and issue in a series of sensible products. Moreover, there are signs which point to his full alertness as he deals with the content of each scholion. In line 673 of the tragedy he preferred μƔƛƘʎƟ to the variant ƢƔƛƘʎƟ and in 1275 he put in his poetic text ƾƢŪ ơDzƝƫƟ instead of ǎƢŪ ơDzƝƫƟ. So he refashioned the corresponding notes accordingly: 673 ƛƔʝμƔ : ƛƔƧμƔƥƦȶƟ ƝƔȴ ơǵơƟ ơȎƝ ǂƟ ƦƜƤ ǎƞƢƜƙơƜ μƔƛƘʎƟ. ŵUY 1 ƦƜƤ ǎƞƢƒƙơƜ Y: ƦƜƤ ǎƞƢƒƙƘƜ U: ƦƜ ǎƞƢƜƙƮμƘƟơƟ ŵ

1275 ǒơƜƝƘƟ țƞƞơƤ ǎƢƜƥƦƣƔƨƘȴƤ (sic AUY pro ƾƢơ-) ƦƔʎƤ ƾƢȶ Ʀơʝ Ʃơƣơʝ ƞƐƖƘƜƟ Ʀơʝ μȲ ƾƢơƞƜμƢƏƟƘƥƛƔƜ ƦʬƟ ơDzƝƫƟ ǓƫƤ ǎƢƔƟƐƞƛƫƥƜƟ ƾƢȶ ƦʀƤ ƢƧƣɱƤ. ŵUY The picture of his abilities becomes even more favourable when we come to consider the following case. The ancient Scholiast had read datives in 129 ƢƑμɯ ƝƔȴ ƩƔƣɲ and therefore fashioned his note as follows: 129a ƾƞƞŪ ǎƢȴ ƢƑμɯ ƝƔȴ ƩƔƣɲ : ǎƢȴ ƩƔƣɲ ƗȰ ƝƔȴ ƢƑμƔƦƜ ƢɱƥƜ ƝƧƝƞơʝƥƜƟ ơǯ ƛƘơȵŭ ƢƑμɯ ƗȰ ƾƟƦȴ ƢƑμƔƦƜ ƝƔƦȮ ƾƢơƝơƢƑƟ. L However AUY all read nominatives, i.e. ƢʀμƔ ƝƔȴ ƩƔƣƏ and so the ascholiast omitted the above note as irrelevant; instead, he offered: 129 ƾƞƞŪ ǎƢȴ ƢʀμƔ : Ʀȶ ǏƠʀƤŭ ƾƞƞŪ ǎƢȴ ƢɱƥƜ ƢʀμƔ ƝƔȴ ƩƔƣȮ ƝƧƝƞơʝƥƜƟ AUY. 1 lm. deest in U

We are not sure whether he devised the scholion himself or borrowed it from elsewhere. Still, his handling of the situation offers clear evidence that he does not follow his source blindly, but rewrites or selects scholia

2 Characteristics of the versions and/ or affiliations of their manuscripts

31

under the influence of and in accordance with his own poetic text. The ascholiast is able to think for himself. Let us now turn to the cases in which a offers an interesting reading where L is corrupt or has a prima facie untenable reading: 13a.3 256.2 258b.1 280b.2 630.1 754.1 815.1 1275.3 1278a2

ǒƝƕƔƞƞƘ AUY T: ǒƝƕƔƞƘƟ LLp Ʀơʝ ƢƏƛơƧƤ L T R: Ʀȶ ƢƏƛơƤ AUƈ ǣƖƟƜƥƘƟ ƔȏƦȶƟ scripsi coll. sch. 287.2: ǣƖƟƜƥƘƟ ǏƔƧƦȶƟ AUY: ǣƖƟƜƥƘƟ LR T: ǢƖƟƜƥƘƟ R ƾƟƘƝƦƜƝưƦƔƦơƟ AUY: ƾƟƘƝƦƮƦƔƦơƟ (-ƝƦƫ- R) L R: ƾƟƘƩƮμƘƟơƟ T ƘDzƢơƜƤ L: ƘDzƢɾƤ AUƈ ƦȶƟ AUY T: ƦʬƟ L ǎƢƜƢƟƘƯƥƘƜƘƟ AUY T Lp: ǎƢƜƢƟƘƯƥƘƜ L ǎƢƔƟƐƞƛƫƥƜƟ AUƈ: ǎƢƐƞƛƫƥƜƟ L sch. ad v. 1278 adscripserunt ŵUY: voci ƢơƞƞƏ v. 1277 superscripsit L

These readings can be explained as conjectures, since they do not require any level of critical ability which is higher than that exhibited in the creation of the a-version; it is quite hard to think that they represent an unbroken tradition from a lost good copy which is independent of the surviving ones. I think that the value of a is the same in the Philoctetes scholia too; the thirteen cases which Janz adduces to prove that a goes back to an independent source are to my mind inadequate.21 In ten of these cases, the readings of a are surely conjectures which should not be adopted in the establishment of the text of ancient scholia: 98.2 ƦʬƟ should be avoided, since it renders the sentence less idiomatic. 246.1a ǎƢƘȴ μƑ troubles Janz, but is in fact what the Scholiast wrote. Certainly causal sentences take the ơȎ negative in classical Attic, but in later Greek μƑ is also possible. One may compare, for example, sch. El. 31.3 … ȃƦƜ μȲ ƢƏƟƧ ƔȎƛƐƝƔƥƦơƤ ƨƔƒƟƘƦƔƜ and sch. Tr. 1a.11 ... ǎƢƘȴ μƚƗȰ ƦȮ ƗƘƯƦƘƣƔ ƦʀƤ ƘȎƗƔƜμơƟƒƔƤ ƔȎƦʭ ƗƐƗƫƝƘƟ. 355.1a ƦƘƛƏƨƛƔƜ in a is a deliberate change made in the course of rewriting the scholion. Factual errors are not untypical of the ancient Scholiast.

21 Janz 2004, 71–4.

32

Introduction

531.1a The ancient Scholiast presumably takes ƘȔ ƢƣƏƦƦƫ transitively; the evidence for this is e.g. in sch. Tr. 92.3 where he glosses the ƘȔ ƢƣƏƥƥƘƜƟ of the poetic text as ȞƨƘƞƘʎƟ ƦƜƟƔ. So in sch. Phil. 531.1a he may be supposed to have construed the ȏμʎƟ of LſLp as object to ƘȔ ƢƣƏƦƦƫ: ‘How can I do good services to you both in deed and words?’ 684.2a is insignificant. 814.1 ƗƜȮ ƦơƯƦƫƟ is certainly an improvement on L’s reading, but, like Papageorgiou, I should print ƗƜȮ ƦơƯƦơƧ ƟʝƟ in the text of the ancient scholion. In 818.1 and 988.1a I can see no problem with L’s reading, whereas in sch. 1467.1b L’s reading is tolerable. 902.1b The L scholion is unobjectionable. Janz has misunderstood it. The correct interpretation is ‘I do not speak about a ƗƧƥƩƐƣƘƜƔ which has to do with an illness, but about that particular ƗƧƥƩƐƣƘƜƔ which arises when a man does something which is foreign to his mind’. In the remaining three cases, a’s readings seem to be true but can again be explained as products of conjecture, since they lie within the critical ability of the a-Scholiast: 110 in a has resulted from a careful examination of the content of the conflated entity of L. A comparable case appears in sch. Tr. 446 where AUY omit the last part (Ǡ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǎƢƒμƘμƢƦơƤ, ǎƢƜƢƞƚƝƦƜƝƑ) of L’s obviously conflated text. They give the scholion as follows:

μƘμƢƦƮƤ : μƘμƢƦƑ ƘǮμƜ, ƦơƧƦƐƥƦƜ μƐμƨơμƔƜ. AUY 1 lm. deest in AU

727.1a/b ƛƘơʎƤ is a supplement based on the poetic text. 830.2 ƉƜƞơƝƦƑƦơƧ is an obvious correction. We are now able to establish what de Marco assumed, but did not prove: a had no access to a tradition independent of L, and so can be generally ignored as a witness to the text of the ancient scholia. However, it deserves the editor’s attention in some of the places where it departed from an erroneous reading of L in favour of a conjecture of its scribe.

2 Characteristics of the versions and/ or affiliations of their manuscripts

33

The Triclinian version: T Ta De Marco was the first to assert the independence of Ta from T for the OC 22 scholia. Although he offered no justification of his view, he at least recognised that ‘V (=his symbol for Ta) … rappresenta la recensio tricliniana men bene di T’. One year later, Turyn pronounced the same verdict with regard to the ancient scholia to the Oedipus Coloneus, Trachiniae and Philoctetes, but like de Marco he refrained from citing any 23 supporting evidence. Then, Janz found evidence in favour of T’s status as model of Ta in the Philoctetes scholia, but still he was not ready to dismiss his predecessors’ theory entirely, for he believed that the data could be 24 explained either way. Now, taking into account the evidence from the ancient scholia to the Trachiniae, the balance of probability is that Ta derives from T. Ƈa reproduces all the errors of T not just in the alternative formulations but also in the material which Triclinius left unrevised. As T is an extremely accurate piece of work, the items in this list are very few: 21b.5 63.1 109.1 223.2 868a.2

ǂƕƞƚƦơƤ] ǂƝƞƚƦơƤ TTa ƥƢơƧƗƔʎơƟ] ƥƢơƧƗƔƒʪ TTa ƢơƞƧƨƣơƟƦƒƥƦơƜƤ] ƢơƞƧƨƣƮƟƦơƜƤ TTa ǿƣưμƘƟƔ] ƗƣưμƘƟƔ ƇTa ƢƣƮƥƘƜƥƜƟ] ƢƣƮƘƜƥƜƟ TTa

However in two cases Ta avoids the error in T, but in the first case any scribe could correct his model and in the second the reading of Ta may be thought to be a happy slip: 1a.2 296.2

ƦȶƟ LMRƇa: ƦʬƟ Ƈ

ƘȒƨƣơƟơƤ LTa: ǒμƨƣơƟơƤ T

Ta is alone in error at a very great number of instances. A sample of its mistakes is the following: 20.2 25.1–2 26.4

džƩƘƞʭơƟ ƔȎƦȲƟ ƗưƥƘƜƟ om. Ta ƢƘƣƜƢƐƥƫ – ƖƔμƚƛƘʎƥƔ om. Ta ƝƔȴ om. Ta

22 De Marco 1951, 24–5. 23 Turyn 1952, 70 and 202. 24 Janz 2004, 87.

34

Introduction

32.1 160–3.3 172.3 172.6 172.10 240.2 250b.2 259.1 259–60.1 322.2 394a.2 399.1 462–3.2 484.2 558b.1 584–6.2 808.1 843.1 922.1 1089.1 1115.1 1168.1–2

ƖƘƫƣƖƮƤ] ǿ Ɩ. MR: post ǎƣƖƔƙȷμƘƟơƤ transp. T: om. Ta ǎμƔƧƦʁ] ǎμƔƧƦʭ Ta ƖƣƔƒƔƤ] ƖƣƐƔƤ Ta ŸƫƗƫƟƔƒƫƟ LTp.c.: ŸƫƗƫƟƐƫƟ Ta.c.Ta Ʀȶ] ƦȲƟ Ta ƦȮƤ] ƦʀƤ Ta ƖȮƣ om. Ƈa ơȎƝ DzƗƜơƟ om. Ƈa ƦȲƟ om. Ta ǂƣƔ] DŽƣƔ Ta ƦȶƟ om. Ta μƐƖƔƤ] μƐƖƔ Ƈa ƔȎƦʀƤ] ƔȎƦʬƟ Ta ƝƔȴ (pr.)] ƝƔȴ ƝƔȴ (sic) Ta ƦʬƟ om. Ta ƾƞƞŪ – fin. om. Ta ǟ ƢơƜƟȲƟ ƾƢƔƜƦơʝƥƔ om. Ta ơȎƝ ǒƖƟƫ om. Ta ƝơƜμƫμȱƟƚƟ om. Ta ǎƠƘƖȳƖƘƣƦƔƜ om. Ta ƝƔȴ ǟƥƧƩȯƥƔƤ om. Ƈa ƝƔȴ – ƨƛƘƖƖơμȱƟƚƤ om. Ta

The practical significance of this discussion is that the testimony of Ta should not appear in the apparatus criticus. About the principles which guided the Byzantine scholar in his handling of the text of the ancient scholia, Janz has this to say: ‘Triclinius’ aim was not so much to recover the original wording of the scholia, as to make the scholia which he found in his sources into a useful tool for understanding the text’.25

My detailed analysis of the Triclinian version indicates that this description fits the evidence perfectly, and we may proceed to investigate in some detail the nature of the Triclinian adaptation. The following features are deserving of remark. (i) Triclinius tries to avoid repetition of ideas by various methods of which the most usual is the excision of synonyms or near-synonyms from the text: 1a.20 72.1 25 Janz 2004, 95.

ƦƘ ƝƔȴ ǎƟƟơƑƥƔƤ om. T ƾƢƚƞƞƏƖƚ om. T

2 Characteristics of the versions and/ or affiliations of their manuscripts

216.1–2 355b.2 454a1.1

35

ƝƔȴ ǂƟƫ ƔDzƣơμƔƜ om. T ƝƔƦơƣƛʬƥƔƜ om. T ƝƞʀƣơƤ, μơʎƣƔ om. Ƈ

In other cases Triclinius uses not excision but modification. In e.g. sch. 82.2 he replaces ƥƧƟƔƖƫƟƜơƯμƘƟơƤ, which duplicates the sense of ƥƧƞƞƚƪƮμƘƟơƤ, by ǎƢƔƖƫƟƜơƯμƘƟơƤ (contend for; see LSJ s.v. 2). Or in sch. 849a.3 he changes the pleonastic phrase ƔȎƦƮƩƘƜƣ ǏƔƧƦʀƤ to ƔȎƦƮƩƘƜƣ ƝƔȴ ƔȎƦƑ. On the other hand, verbal repetitions in the ancient commentary may be the result of the conflation of originally distinct scholia brought about by late transcribers, but Triclinius seems not to have recognised this fact. Accordingly, in treating sch. 491a1+aa2, he removes the second instance of ƦȲƟ ƛƘơμƔƩƒƔƟ, instead of separating the two notes, as a modern editor would do. A similar case is sch. 479–80a + b. Generally, he undertakes rewriting of conflated entities with a view to avoiding iteration, and not separation thereof. (ii) He excludes material which he deems to be mistaken26 or uninstructive for his audience. Some of this, i.e. in sch. 7b, 673, 810 and 1275, is related to his choice of readings for the constitution of his poetic text: 7b.4–5 130–1.2–5 203–4.1–2 638.5 673.2 810.2–3 963.1 1055b.1 1060.1 1160.2 1275.1–3

ƘǮ ƗȰ – fin. om. Ƈ ǟƥƧƩƔƜƦƐƣƔƟ – fin. om. T ȂμμƔ o Ǡ om. Ƈ Ǡ – fin. om. T ƖƣȯƨƘƦƔƜ – fin. om. Ƈ ǎȮƟ – ƛƐμƜƟ om. T ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƢƣơƝƞƔƒơƧƥƜƟ om. T Ǡ ƟƘƝƣȷƟ om. Ƈ ƝƔƝƮƖƞƫƥƥơƤ om. Ƈ ƪƧƩȲƟ ǎƝȯƢƧƥƥƘƟ om. T ǒơƜƝƘƟ – ƢƧƣɱƤ om. Ƈ

26 De Marco 1951, 24 cites an interesting case where Triclinius openly refutes the claim made by the ancient scholiast that ʜƧƦƑƣ at OC 900 means ȏƢƮƗƚμƔ: ‘ƥƢƘƯƗƘƜƟ ƾƢȶ ʜƧƦʀƣơƤ: ǢƖơƧƟ ƾƢȶ μƜɱƤ ǿƣμʀƤ, ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ȟƤ ǒƩƘƜ ǓƝƔƥƦơƤ ƥƩƑμƔƦơƤ. ƘDzƣƚƦƔƜ ǎƝ μƘƦƔƨơƣɱƤ ƦʬƟ ƗƜƫƝƮƟƦƫƟ ƦƜƟȮƤ ƥƦƣƔƦƜƫƦʬƟ ƝƔȴ ƢƏƥƔƤ ǟƟƒƔƤ ƩƔƞưƟƦƫƟ, ȣƥƦƘ ƦƔƩƯƦƘƣơƟ ƨƐƣƘƥƛƔƜŭ ʜƧƦʀƣƔƤ ƖȮƣ ƦơȸƤ ƩƔƞƜƟơƯƤ ƨƚƥƜƟ, ơȎ ƦȮ ȏƢơƗƑμƔƦƔ, ȟƤ ƦȮ ƥƩƮƞƜƔ ƞƐƖƘƜ’.

36

Introduction

(iii) He adds words which the ancient scholiast left to be understood, with a view to achieving greater elucidation of meaning for his Byzantine audience. Some examples: 1a.1–2 1a.10 1a.14 1a.20 212.2 287.1–2 320.1 462–3.1 497d.1 540–2.2 983–4.1 1148–9.2 1259.5

μƘƦƔƖƘƟƐƥƦƘƣơƤ ƖȮƣ] μƘƦ. ƖȮƣ Ʀơʝ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ T post ƗƘƯƦƘƣƔ add. ƔȎƦơʝ T post ƩƣƚƥƛʀƟƔƜ add. ƔȎƦʭ T post ƛƔƧμƏƥƔƤ add. žʝƣơƤ T ƥƢƔƣƘʎƥƔƟ] ƥƢƔƣ. NJƣƦƘμƜƟ T: om. R post ƢƣơƥƗƮƝƔ add. ƔȎƦȶƟ ǣƠơƟƦƔ T post ƾƢȶ ƥƔƧƦʀƤ add. ƨƚƥƒƟ, ƘǮƢȰ Ƈ post ǾƟƘƜƗƜƥƛƑƥƘƦƔƜ add. ȏƢŪ ǎμơʝ Ƈ post ƢƣƏƖμƔƦƜ add. ǟ žƯƢƣƜƤ T post μơƜ add. ǿ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ T ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ] ǧƣ. ƦƔʝƦƔ ƨƚƥȴƟ T ƾƟƏƠƜƔ] ƾƟ. Ʀơʝ ŸƜȶƤ T ƾƟƜμɱƥƛƔƜ] ƾƟ., ƾƟƏƢƔƧƘ ƦȲƟ ƕơȲƟ T

(iv) He makes an effort to strengthen the cohesion of certain passages: 129–31.2 200.3 449.4 867.1 1160.1

ƢƣƏƖμƔƦƔ] ƔȎƦȮ T post ƝƔƦƔƕƮƥƝƘƦƔƜ add. ƝƔȴ ƦƐμƟƘƜ Ƈ ƛƐƞɾƤ] ƛƘƞƑƥɾƤ Ƈ ƟƘưƦƘƣơƟ] ƝƔƜƟƮƦƘƣơƟ T ƪƧƩȲ] ƪƧƩƑ, ƾƢȶ ƗȰ ƪƧƩʀƤ Ʀȶ ƢƟƐƘƜƟ T

(v) An atticising tendency in the area of syntax and vocabulary is responsible for several deviations from Koine or post-classical usage found in the original: arg. I.26 1a.8 39.1 151–2.1 179b.2–3 192.2 587.1 745.1

ƗƐƗƫƝƘƟ] ǒƗƫƝƘƟ T ƦƒƤ ƢƏƟƦƫƟ ƾƟƛƣưƢƫƟ ƘȎƗƔƜμơƟƐƥƦƘƣơƤ] ƦƒƤ ƔȎƦơʝ ƢƏƟ. ƾƟƛ. ƘȎƗƔƜμơƟƐƥƦƘƣơƤ T ƘǮƤ ǡƟ ... ƝƔƦʫƝƚƥƘƟ] ǎƟ ɓ ... ƝƔƦʫƝƚƥƘƟ Ƈ ƖƔμƚƛƘƒƚ] ƖƔμƚƛʁ Ƈ ƾƢƔƖƖƐƞƞƘƜƟ] ƾƢƔƖƖƘƞƘʎƟ T ƾƢƔƖƖƐƞƞƫƟ] ƾƢƔƖƖƘƞʬƟ Ƈ ƘǮ ƗȰ μȲ ǎƟƘƣƖƑƥɾ] ƘǮ ƗȰ μȲ ǎƟƘƣƖƑƥƘƜ Ƈ ƙƚƞȻƥƘƜƘƟ] ǎƙƑƞƫƥƘƟ T27

27 However, in sch. 322 he does retain the late form of the potential optative.

2 Characteristics of the versions and/ or affiliations of their manuscripts

824.1 810.4 13a.4 100b.1–2 216.2 272–3.1 703a1 801.1 849a.1 868a.1–2

37

ƢƔƣƐƞƛơƜ] ƢƔƣƐƞƛɾ T ƢƣȯƠɾƤ] ƢƣƏƠƘƜƔƤ T ƝƔƦƔƟơμȮƤ] ƟơμȮƤ Ƈ Ʀȶ ƥƦƘƟƮμƔƝƣơƟ] ǎƥƦȴ Ʀȶ ƥƦƘƟȶƟ ƝƔȴ ǎƢȵμƚƝƘƤ Ƈ μƘƞƜƗƏƣƜơƟ] μƘƞȹƗƣƜơƟ T ƾƞƞƔƩƮƥƘ] ƾƞƞƔƩơʝ Ƈ ǎƝƢƜƔƥƛƐƟƦơƤ] ǎƝƢƜƘƥƛƐƟƦơƤ Ƈ ǎƟɿƥƩƧƦƔƜ] ƔǮƥƩƯƟƘƦƔƜ T ƝƔƝơμơƜƣƒƔ] ƝƔƝȲ μơʎƣƔ T ƝƔƦƘƥƦƧƖƟƔƝƧʎƔ] ƥƦƧƖƟƑ T

(vi) Triclinius is also concerned to attain clarity of language and precision of expression. This may occasionally entail removing idiomatic uses of number and tenses. For example in sch. 1a, 100, 548–9 the plural is used to replace the collective singular. arg.29 1a.2 100b.2 372b.1 548–9a.2 588.2 616.3 766.2 794a.2 824.2 874.2 1225–6.1 1233.1

ƘȎƫƩƘʎƦơ] ƘȎƫƩƑƥƔƦơ T ƟƮμơƧ ƖƣƔƨƑƟ] ƟƮμƫƟ ƖƣƔƨƑƟ T (he replaces collective singular by plural) Ʀȶ ƢƘƣƜƘƩƮμƘƟơƟ] ƦȮ ƢƘƣƜƘƩƮμƘƟƔ T ƾƛƣơƒƥμƔƦƜ] ƥƧƟƔƛƣơƒƥμƔƦƜ Ƈ Ʀơʝ ƾƟƗƣȷƤ] ƦʬƟ ƾƟƗƣʬƟ T Ɨƣɲ] ƗƣƏƥƘƜ Ƈ ƢƘƣƜƘƣƖƏƙƘƥƛƔƜ] ƢƘƣƜƘƣƖƏƥƔƥƛƔƜ Ƈ ƥƧƟȵƥƦƔƦƔƜ] ƥƧƟƒƥƦƔƦơ T Ʀʭ ƥưμƔƦƜ Kruytbosch 49: Ʀơʝ ƥưμƔƦơƤ L: ƦơʎƤ ȂμμƔƥƜ T ƖƘƟƐƥƛƔƜ] ƖƘƟƑƥƘƥƛƔƜ T ơȎƝ ǂƢƘƜƥƜƟ] ơȎ ƝƏƦƘƜƥƜƟ T ƾƟƔƝƞƜƛƘʎƥƔƟ] ƥƧƟƔƟƔƝƞƜƛƘʎƥƔƟ Ƈ ǒƛƚƝƘƟ] ƦƐƛƘƜƝƘƟ Ƈ

(vii) Finally, he substitutes synonyms for words in his original. His motive is often simplification, but for some of his deviations, i.e. in sch. 1a, 668, one can find no motive: 1a.7 72.1 160–3.1 160–3.4 367.1

ǿƞȷƩƣƧƥơƟ] ƢȯƟƩƣƧƥơƟ T Ʀơʝ ƗơƧƞƘƯƘƜƟ] ƦʀƤ ƗơƧƞƘƒƔƤ T ǎƠɿƘƜ] ǎƠƑƣƩƘƦơ T ƦƐƝƟƫƟ] ƢƔƒƗƫƟ T ǎƟ ƗơƯƞƚƤ μƐƣƘƜ] ȟƤ ƗơƯƞƚƟ T

38

Introduction

587.1–2 594.2 628.2 660a1.2 668.2 821a.2 932.2 1131.4 1249–50.2

ǎƢƜƩƘƜƣƑƥƘƫƤ] ǎƖƩƘƜƣƑƥƘƫƤ T ƥƝƘƧƏƥμƔƦơƤ] ƝƔƦƔƥƝƘƧƏƥμƔƦơƤ Ƈ ƢƣơƥƚƝȯμƚƟ] ǎƗƘƠȯμƚƟ Ƈ ƢƣơƨƏƥƘƫƤ] ƢƔƣƔƜƟƐƥƘƫƤ T ƗưƣƫƟ] ƗƫƣƚμƏƦƫƟ Ƈ μƔƟƦƘƒơƧ] μƔƟƦƘƯμƔƦơƤ T ǞƢƔƦʀƥƛƔƜ] ǎƠƚƢƔƦʀƥƛƔƜ T μƔƟƦƘƯơƟƦƔƜ] μƔƟƦƘƯơƧƥƜƟ T ƖƔμƑƥƫ] μƟƚƥƦƘƯƥơμƔƜ T

Having taken a general view of the Triclinian text, we now turn to assess its contribution to the establishment of the text of the ancient scholia. This is a question which has divided the opinions of scholars,28 but this is surprising, given the fact that the evidence is unambiguous and points to a clear answer: Triclinius cannot be dispensed with, because, in many cases where he does not revise the original wording of scholia, he is alone in attesting the truth: 1b 48.1 52.1 101.1 140.3 157 160–3.2 188b.1 280b 309 434–5b.3 503.2 556b.1 575.3 616.2 629.2

sch. ad v. 1 adscripsit T: post sch. 13b.2 ƾƢȶ ƝƣƑƟƚƤ aberraverunt in LM ǎƖƖƘƖƣƔμμƐƟơƟ T: ǎƖƖƘƖƣƔμμƐƟƚƟ LMR ƟơƧƛƘƦƘʎƟ T: ƟơƧƛƘƦơʝƟ L: ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƟơƧƛƘƦʬƟ R ǏʭƔ Ƈ: Ǔƫ LƀR ƢƔƣơƣɲ ƦȶƟ … ƢƔʎƗƔ Ƈ: ƢƔƣơƣɲ Ʀơʝ … ƢƔƜƗȶƤ LR sch. ad v. 157 adscripsit T: ad v. 155 LR ƢƣȷƟơƜƔƟ T: ƢƣơƟơƒƔƜ LR ƛƘƣơμƐƟʪ Ƈ: ƝƔƛƔƜƣơμƐƟʪ LR sch. separatim posuit T: cum sch. 280a coniungitur in LR sch. ad v. 309 adscripsit T: ad v. 313 LR ƨƜƞơƟƘƜƝƑƥƫ T: ƨƜƞơƟƘƜƝƑƥơƜ L ƦƒƟƘƤ Ƈ: ƦƜƟȰƤ L Ʀʭ T: Ʀȶ L ƝƔƦƔƝƚƞơʝƟ T: ƝƔƦƔƝƚƞơʝƟƦơƤ L ƔȎƦơʎƤ T: ƔȎƦʭ L ƦơƯƦʪ Ƈ: ƦơƧƦơ, sine accentu, L

28 Papageorgiou did not use the Triclinian testimony for his edition, whereas de Marco employed it sporadically, recognising that Triclinius contains good conjectures (1952; 1951, 26). Turyn 1952, 70, 202 pointed out the usefulness of these manuscripts, and Janz 2004, after a detailed investigation, put them to full use.

2 Characteristics of the versions and/ or affiliations of their manuscripts

633a1.2 638.1 660a1.3 660a2.1 690a.1 695a.2 781.2 808.1 901.1–2 931.1 939.3 981.1 1003a.2 1086.1 1121.1 1131.1 1192.1 1235–6.2 1259.4 1259.5

39

Ʀʭ Ƈ: Ʀȶ L džμƨƜƝƦȹơƟƘƤ T: ƾμƨƜƝƦƧƮƟƘƤ sic L ǎƢȴ Ʀʭ Ƈ: ǎƢȴ Ʀȶ L ǒƞƛơƜ T: ǒƞƛơƜƤ L ƾƢȶ ƝƦƚƥȵơƧ T: ƾƢơƝƦƜƝơƧ L ƘǮƤ T: ȏƢȶ L ƝƔƦȮ μƐƥơƟ Wolff 200: ƝƔƦȮ Ʀȶ μƐƥơƟ Ƈ: ƝƔƦȮ μƐƥơƤ L ǟ ƢơƜƟȲƟ T: ǟ ƢơƜƟȲ ǟ L ƦȮ ƔȎƦơʝ T: Ʀơʝ ƔȎƦơʝ L ƢƔƩƘʎƔƜ T: ƦƔƩƘʎƔƜ L ƔȎƦʭ T: ƔȎƦȲƟ L μơƜ T: μƘ L ƛƘƣƔƢƘƯƥơƟƦƔ T: ƛƘƣƔƢƘƯƥƔƟƦƔ L ƕƏƞơƜƤ T: ƞƏƕơƜƤ L ƥơƨƒƙɾ Ƈ: ƥơƨȵƙƘƜƤ L ǂƢƜƥƦơƟ Ƈ (coni. iam Lascaris): ƾƢƜƥƦʬƟ L ƗƘʎ T: om. L ƛƘƚƞƔƥȵƔƤ Ƈ (coni. iam Lascaris): ƚƞƔƥƒƔƤ L ƥƘƔƧƦʀƤ T: ƥƘƔƧƦơʝ L ƝƘƝơƞƞƚμƐƟơƟ T: ƝƘƝơƞƞƚμƐƟơƧ L

There are five additional cases where T’s true reading is shared by another manuscript, i.e. Lp: 374.1 510.1 556b.2 616.1 839–40.2

ƝƘƩƔƣƜƥμƐƟƔ TLp: ƝƘƩƫƣƜƥμƐƟƔ L ƢƮƞƜƤ TLp (Ƣơƞ): ƢƮƞƘƜƤ L ƔȎƦʭ ƇLp: ƔȎƦȶ L ƢƣơƥȳƝƫƟ TLp: ƢƣơƥʀƝơƟ L ƁƐƥƥơƧ TLp: ƟƮƥơƧ L

How should these readings be accounted for? Did Triclinius find them in a manuscript which is no longer extant or did he conjecture them himself? In considering this question, Janz begins with a demonstration that Triclinius drew on many different sources for the composition of his corpus of scholia, but the evidence he cites has nothing to do with the learned annotation which is characteristic of the scholia vetera. Instead, it takes the form of glosses or elementary notes dealing with meanings of words. This fact shows that the material which Triclinius derived from sources other than L is related to scholia recentiora or byzantina. Janz does not include in his evidence even one single scholium vetus which is not found in L. Moreover, he does not argue for any good reading in T as being

40

Introduction

beyond the reach of Triclinius.29 The material supplied by the scholia to the Trachiniae confirm this picture. Here again, T contains no ancient note which does not already exist in L. Also, Triclinius’ critical abilities, as have emerged from the detailed analysis of his version, can easily account for T’s good readings listed above. It seems therefore very likely that so far as the ancient notes are concerned, Triclinius was wholly dependent on L.30 We may test this hypothesis by verifying that T reproduces the erroneous readings and conflations of L, except in those passages where we have seen that Triclinius has recovered the truth by conjecture. Here is the relevant material: 1a.10 26.2 151–2 172.4 344.2 352–5.6 497b.2 510.1 520b.2 592a1.1 540–2.3 688.2 736 770a.2 856b.1 866.1 917.1 963.2–3 1010–1.3 1093b1.2 1118.4 1126.2

ƢƣơƕƔƞơμƐƟơƧ Papageorgiou: ƢƣơƕƔƞƞơμƐƟơƧ L T MR ƘȎƦƧƩʬƤ Papageorgiou: ƘȎƦƧƩȰƤ L T MR sch. ad vv. 151–2 rettuli: ad v. 148 rettulerunt L T R ƢƘƞƜơȸƤ scripsi: ƢơƞƜơȸƤ L T R ƦȮƤ Brunck: ƦơȸƤ L T R ŹȒƣƧƦơƤ Müller: ǺƨƜƦơƤ LTR ƢƘƢơƒƚƦƔƜ Kruytbosch: ƢƐƢƔƧƦƔƜ L T ƃǮƟƜƏƗƔƜ Stiehle: ƃǮƟƒƔƜ L T ƔȎƦơȸƤ Heath: ƔȎƦȮƤ L T ƦȲƟ ƖƟʬƥƜƟ scripsi: ƦȲƟ (om. Ƈ) ƢƒƥƦƜƟ L T ƢơƞƧƩƣơƟƒơƧ Dindorf: ƢơƞƧƩƣơƟƒƔƤ L T μƔƞƞʭ Kruytbosch: μƔƞƞȶƟ L T sch. ad hunc v. adscripsit Lascaris: ad v. 734 rettulerunt LT ƝƟƚƥμȶƤ scripsi: ǿ ƪƮƨơƤ LT Ʀȶ ƗƮƣƧ scripsi: ǟ ƞƮƖƩƚ L T μƐƖƔƟ Stephanus: μƐƖƔ L T ǎƟƔƞơμƐƟƚ Papageorgiou: ǎƟƔƞƞơμƐƟƚ L T ƢƞƑƛơƧƤ … ǎƢƔƝơƞơƧƛơʝƟƦơƤ Nauck: ƢƞʀƛơƤ ... ǎƢƔƝơƞơƧƛơƯƟƦƫƟ L T ǛƞƞƚƟƘƤ scripsi: ǗƞƞƚƟƘƤ L T ȁ Stephanus: ȁƟ L T Ʀʁ ... ƾƗƜƝƚƥƏƥɾ scripsi: ƦȲƟ ... ƾƗƜƝƑƥƔƥƔƟ L T μȲ ƗƐơƟ Papageorgiou: μƚƗȰƟ L: μȲ ƗȰ T

29 Janz 2004, 95–6. 30 The case is slightly different in the OC scholia. There the Triclinian version derives its ancient material mainly from L, but it also gives a segment of an ancient note which does not exist in L. Triclinius seems to have borrowed it from a manuscript of the Roman version: see de Marco 1951, 25; 1952, viii–ix.

2 Characteristics of the versions and/ or affiliations of their manuscripts

41

Erroneous conflations: see critical apparatus in sch. 136a2 (L R), 144–9 (L R), 217b2 (L T R), 230–1 (L T R), 238b (L T R), 243b (L T R), 281b (L T R), 379b (L T), 434–5b (L T), 520c (L T), 640–3 (L T), 643a2 (L T) etc. With regard to the practical side of the issue, this is one of those few cases in which, although a manuscript is likely to be dependent on another which is still extant, we are not justified in dismissing it. Triclinius is an acute critic, and one should always want to consult his text; the testimony of T should figure prominently in any critical apparatus and its readings should be recorded in their fullness.

Stemma of the tradition Conclusions In the examination of the manuscripts so far, we have seen that both the Triclinian and the a versions contain some manifestly true readings which are not in L. We have also seen that these readings are probably not survivals from ancient sources which are independent of L, but have been restored conjecturally by the authors of the versions. We have therefore advanced the thesis that these two versions are wholly dependent on L for the ancient part of their corpus of scholia. With regard to the Roman version, the evidence for independence from L is too scanty, for in the Trachiniae scholia M and R break off at an early point of the text, namely at sch. 112–3 and sch. 360a2 respectively. But if we should suppose that the behaviour of MR is the same here as in the other plays where there is plenty of evidence for independence, then MR should be allowed to be deriving from a source other than L. In any case, in practical terms MR offer just two true readings which are not in L, one of which is probably a conjecture. Turning now to the character of the tradition as a whole, such common errors as the following point to the existence of an archetype:31 1a.10 26.2 65.1 101.1

ƢƣơƕƔƞơμƐƟơƧ Papageorgiou: ƢƣơƕƔƞƞơμƐƟơƧ L T MR ƘȎƦƧƩʬƤ Papageorgiou: ƘȎƦƧƩȰƤ L T MR ƗƜƔƦƣƒƕơƟƦơƤ Stephanus: ƗƜƔƦƣƒƕơƟƦƔ L MR: ƗƜƔƦƣƒƕơƟƦƜ T ǏʭƔ T (coni. iam Lascaris): Ǔƫ L MR

31 See also the table on p. 40 for cases of common errors of L and T where M and R are unavailable.

42

Introduction

151–2 172.4 280b.2

sch. ad vv. 151–2 rettuli: ad v. 148 rettulerunt L T R ƢƘƞƜơȸƤ scripsi: ƢơƞƜơȸƤ L T R ƾƟƘƝƦƜƝưƦƔƦơƟ a (ex coniectura): ƾƟƘƝƦƮƦƔƦơƟ L: ƾƟƘƝƦưƦƔƦơƟ R: ƾƟƘƩƮμƘƟơƟ T ƦȮƤ Brunck: ƦơȸƤ L T R ŹȒƣƧƦơƤ Müller: ǺƨƜƦơƤ L T R

344.2 352–5.6

The closed character of the recension is also clear from the fact that the manuscripts coincide in conflating distinct scholia in the same erroneous way: see the critical apparatus in e.g. sch. 136a2 (L R), 144–9 (L R), 217b2 (L T R), 230–1 (L T R), 238b (L T R), 243b (L T R), 280b (L R), 281b (L T R). Stemma codicum:32

lr

L

r ſ

a

T Lp

M A

U

R

Y

Ta

The survey of the manuscript tradition points to the conclusion that the text should be primarily based upon the testimony of L and MR. T should be taken systematically into account, although it ultimately derives from L, for it contains much interesting material stemming from the conjectural activity of the eminent Byzantine scholar Demetrius Triclinius. With regard to the other descendants of L, namely ſ and a, the editor is justified

32 Note: The stemma concerns the ancient scholia exclusively; it does not take into consideration any byzantine scholia which may appear in the corpora of individual manuscripts. It does not include Hesychius either; he is not an indirect witness, although he does contain six entries which bear strong similarities with our text (Hesych. Ɣ 7375: sch. Tr. 69; Ɣ 2025: sch. Tr. 94; Ɣ 1307: sch. Tr. 216; Ɣ 4073: sch. Tr. 527; Ɣ 4999: sch. Tr. 783; Ɣ 5466: sch. Tr. 223. See Xenis 2010, 81–3).

3 Previous editions

43

in citing only those cases in which their scribes have offered conjectures to treat obvious mistakes in L.

3 Previous editions The previous editions of the scholia vetera to Sophocles are described in detail in my edition of the Electra scholia.33 Here I only add some information which is specifically related to the Trachiniae scholia. Editions such as Elmsley’s (1825) which do not treat the Trachiniae scholia differently from those to the Electra are not mentioned at all.

3.1 Lascaris34 Janus Lascaris relied heavily on L and, as is suggested by the evidence of the Electra scholia, he may have taken some corrections from Lp. Can the scholia to the Trachiniae clarify further the question of his secondary sources? Lists (i)–(iii) show good readings (not necessarily true ones) which he shares exclusively with the a version, Lp and the Triclinian version respectively. List (iv) comprises the cases where he shares a good reading with more than one manuscript: (i) 256.2 Ʀơʝ ƢƏƛơƧƤ LTR: Ʀȶ ƢƏƛơƤ a Lascaris (ii) 810.3 831–2.2 1091.2 1167a.13 1203.1

ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ Lp Lascaris: ƾƟ (sic) Ʀơʝ L ǟ (alt.) Lp Lascaris: Ǡ L: om. T ƁƘμƐƔƟ Lp Lascaris: ƟƘμƔƒƔƟ L ǒƞƛɾƥƜ Lp Lascaris: ǒƞƛɾ L: dzƝơƜƦơ T lm. ex Lp Lascaris: deest in L; (ơǵƔ s.) L

33 Xenis 2010, 83–97. 34 Commentarii in septem tragedias (sic) Sophoclis quae ex aliis eius compluribus

iniuria temporum amissis, solae superfuerunt. Opus exactissimum rarissimumque in Gymnasio Mediceo Caballini montis a Leone Decimo Pont. Max. constituto recognitum repurgatumque atque ad communem studiosorum utilitatem in plurima exemplaria editum non sine privilegio ut in caeteris. ƆƩȷƞƜƔ ƦʬƟ ƢȯƟƧ ƗơƝȵμƫƟ ƘǮƤ ƦȮƤ ƥƫƙơμȱƟƔƤ (sic pro ƥʪƙ-) ƦʬƟ ƆơƨơƝƞȱơƧƤ ƦƣƔƖʪƗƜʬƟ, Romae 1518.

44

Introduction

1204.1

lm. ex Lp Lascaris: deest in L; (ǿƢơʎƔ s.) L

48.1 52.1

ǎƖƖƘƖƣƔμμƐƟơƟ T Lascaris: ǎƖƖƘƖƣƔμμƐƟƚƟ LLpMR ƟơƧƛƘƦƘʎƟ T Lascaris: ƟơƧƛƘƦơʝƟ L: ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƟơƧƛƘƦʬƟ R ȟƤ Ƈ Lascaris: ƝƔȴ LMR ǏʭƔ T Lascaris: Ǔƫ LLp MR ƢƣȷƟơƜƔƟ T Lascaris: ƢƣơƟơƒɯ LLpR ƛƘƣơμƐƟʪ Ƈ: ƝƔƦƔƛƘƣơμƐƟʪ Lascaris: ƝƔƛƔƜƣơμƐƟʪ LLpR lm. ex T Lascaris: μƚƗŪ ƘDz ƦƜ ƗƣƏƥƘƜƤ LLp: deest in R ǎƗơƞƜưƥƫ] ǎƗơƞƜƘƯƥƫ T Lascaris ƨƜƞơƟƘƜƝƑƥƫ T Lascaris: ƨƜƞơƟƘƜƝƑƥơƜ L: ƨƜƞơƟƘƜƝƑƥƘƜ Lp ǎƣʬƟƦƔ L: ǒƣƫƦƔ T Lascaris ƔȎƦơʎƤ T Lascaris: ƔȎƦʭ LLp džμƨƜƝƦȹơƟƘƤ T Lascaris: ƾμƨƜƝƦƧƮƟƘƤ sic L post ƗƚƞơʝƦƔƜ add. ȃƦƜ T (add. iam Lascaris) μƘƦƔƦƜƛƐƟƔƜ Elmsley: μƘƦƔƦƘƛƘʎƟƔƜ L: μƘƦƔƛƘʎƟƔƜ T Lascaris ǎƝƢƜƔƥƛȱƟƦơƤ L: ǎƝƢƜƘƥƛȱƟƦơƤ Ƈ Lascaris ɒ] ǥƤ T Lascaris ƾƟɿƘƜ T Lascaris: ƾƟƘƒƚ L ǎƟƗƔƦƘʎƥƛƔƜ T Lascaris: ǎƟƗƔƦơʝƥƛƔƜ L ǟ ƢơƜƟȲƟ T Lascaris: ǟ ƢơƜƟȲ ǟ L ƨơƒƟƜƔ] ƨƮƟƜƔ Ƈ Lascaris μƐƞƞơμƘƟ] μƐƞ. ǓƠƘƜƟ T Lascaris ǂƢƜƥƦơƟ Ƈ Lascaris: ƾƢƜƥƦʬƟ L ƛƘƚƞƔƥƒƔƤ Ƈ Lascaris: ǞƞƔƥƒƔƤ LLp ƘǮƤ T Lascaris: om. L

(iii)

94.1 101.1 160–3.2 188b.1 305.1 412.2 434–5b.3 491a2.1 616.2 638.1 643a2.2 660a1.3 703a1.1 752–3.1 765–7.2 791a2.2 808.1 839–40.1 952a1.2 1131.1 1235–6.2 1262.1 (iv) 48.1 69.1 100a.2 160–3.3 198.2 203–4.2 266.8 327a.1

post ƘȒƩơμƔƜ add. ƦơʎƤ ƛƘơʎƤ Lp T Lascaris lm. ex ƇR (Lascaris): ƦȶƟ μȰƟ ƢƔƣƘƞƛƮƟƦŪ ǂƣơƦƣơƟ (ǂƣơƦƣơƟ sic) LLp DŽƣƔ TƀLp Lascaris: ǂƣƔ LR ƢơƜƑƥƫμƔƜ TR Lp Lascaris: ƢơƜƑƥơμƔƜ L ƔȎƦȶƤ om. Ƈ Lp Lascaris ƾƟƔƥƩȶƟ RLpp.c. Lascaris: ƾƟƔƥƩȺƟ LLpa.c.: om. Ƈ ǎƖƐƟơƟƦơ TLp Lascaris: ƖƐƟơƟƦơ L ȏƪƚƞƑƟ TR (Lascaris): ȏƪƚƞƮƟ L

3 Previous editions

344.3 556b.2 584–7.3 616.1 742–3.5 754.1 788.3 839–40.2 856d.2 1167a.9 1247.2

45

ƦȶƟ TRLp Lascaris: ƦȲƟ L ƔȎƦʭ ƇLp Lascaris: ƔȎƦȶ L ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ T Lp Lascaris: ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƤ L ƢƣơƥȳƝƫƟ TLp Lascaris: ƢƣơƥʀƝơƟ L ƛȱμƘƟ T Lp Lascaris: ƛƐμƘƟƔƜ L ƦȶƟ a T Lascaris: ƦʬƟ L ơDZ TLp Lascaris: ơǵơƜ L ƁƐƥƥơƧ TLp Lascaris: ƟƮƥơƧ L ƦƏƟƗƘ TLp Lascaris: ƦɱƟƗƘ L ǎƨƒƞƚƥƘ T Lp Lascaris: ƨƒƞƚƥƘ L μƘ ſ Lp Lascaris: μƔƜ L

The case at sch. 1167a.13 apart, the evidence in list (ii) is admittedly very slender, but still does not disprove the hypothesis that Lascaris employed Lp. It might be that Lp was put to a more limited use here than in the Electra scholia. The new element which now emerges for the first time is that Lascaris may have additionally drawn on a manuscript of the Triclinian version.35 This is, however, far from certain, since I take all of his agreements with Triclinius to be within his reach. Moreover, if he took them from a Triclinian source, he should reasonably be expected to adopt features resulting from Triclinius’ usus retractandi. In this respect, the passage at sch. 952a1.2 may not in fact carry as much weight as it might appear at first sight, for the addition of ǓƠƘƜƟ is strongly suggested by the context. Also, there are cases which show that Lascaris devised a conjecture of his own to treat a corruption in L, although there was one at hand in the Triclinian manuscript: 690a.1 939.3

ƾƢȶ ƝƦƚƥȵơƧ ƇƇa: ƾƢơƝƦƜƝơƧ LſLp: ƾƢȶ ƝƦƚƦơʝ Lascaris ƔȎƦʭ T: ƔȎƦȲƟ L, quod delevit Lascaris

The conclusion is the same as the one which is found in my earlier book: to establish whether or not Lascaris worked from more than one manuscript in preparing his edition is a question which will probably remain unanswered until the full evidence from the scholia on all seven tragedies is gathered.

35 De Marco 1951, 25 had noted this possibility in passing.

46

Introduction

3.2 Juntine36 The author of the Iunta edition, Antonius Francinus Varchiensis, like all the editors of the Sophoclean scholia before Peter Elmsley (1825), did not discover L, and therefore treated Lascaris’ text instar codicis. In the Trachiniae scholia, he reproduced Lascaris’ corpus quite faithfully; he did not add any scholia from other sources nor did he offer any conjectures of his own.

3.3 Turnebus37 In his edition of the Triclinian scholia Adrianus Turnebus included a text of the Triclinian version of the ancient scholia to the Trachiniae. In the reproduction of T, the basis of the edition, his most striking imprecision was that he constantly misinterpreted the abbreviation for ǢƖơƧƟ as ǢƫƤ! He also offered a picture of the manuscript which is far from complete, as he would regularly leave out the notes written in the interlinear spaces of the poetic text.38 In the few instances where T has an error, he would normally introduce a correction from Lascaris or Juntine edition.39 This edition is important for our purposes in so far as it was used by Henri Estienne as a source of corrections for the ancient scholia.

36 ƆơƨơƝƞƐơƧƤ ƦƣƔƖƫƗƒƔƜ (sic) ǏƢƦȮ μƘƦȮ ƥƩơƞƒƫƟ ƢƔƞƔƜʬƟ ƝƔȴ ƢƏƟƧ ǾƨƘƞƒμƫƟ.

Sophoclis tragoediae septem cum interpretationibus vetustis et valde utilibus, Florentiae, per haeredes Philippi Iuntae, anno Domini 1522 sexto kal. Novembris. 37 ŸƚμƚƦƣƒơƧ Ʀơʝ ƇƣƜƝƞƜƟƒơƧ ŹǮƤ ƦȮ Ʀơʝ ƆơƨơƝƞƐơƧƤ ǏƢƦȮ ƗƣƏμƔƦƔ, ƄƘƣȴ μƐƦƣƫƟ ơǵƤ ǎƩƣƑƥƔƦơ ƆơƨơƝƞʀƤ, ƢƘƣȴ ƥƩƚμƏƦƫƟ, ƝƔȴ ƥƩƮƞƜƔ, Parisiis: Apud Adrianum Turnebum typographum regium 1553. For this edition, see Aubreton 1949, 41–5, Turyn 1949, 96, Turyn 1952, 74, and Janz 2004, 142–3. 38 I give here, as a sample, his omissions which concern the scholia to the first 100 lines of the play: sch. 1b, 4, 7b, 27b, 28, 32, 35, 36, 52, 63, 64, 65, 68, 72, 77, 86. 39 For example, he corrected T at sch. 21b.5 ǂƕƞƚƦơƤ] ǂƝƞƚƦơƤ T and 223.2 ǿƣưμƘƟƔ] ƗƣưμƘƟƔ Ƈ, but did not remove its error at sch. 868a.2 ƢƣƮƥƘƜƥƜƟ] ƢƣƮƘƜƥƜƟ T.

3 Previous editions

47

3.4 Estienne40 This is an undeservedly neglected edition. Estienne was the first editor to derive good readings from Triclinius and to bring them to bear on the text of the ancient scholia. His source for these readings was not any Triclinian manuscript but the aforementioned edition of the Triclinian scholia by his master, Adrianus Turnebus (1553). Estienne adopted a series of Triclinian emendations41 to treat corrupt passages in the ancient scholia. In cases where Lascaris and Turnebus offered a different version of a scholion, he would normally print only that of Lascaris, and he would rarely do the opposite.42 However, he would occasionally mix elements of the two versions thus creating a hybrid text:43 695a Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ ƝƏƦƔƖμƔ] Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ ǒƣƜơƟ Ʀơʝ ƢƣơƕƏƦơƧ, μƘƦȮ Ʀȶ ƩƣƒƥƔƜ ƦȶƟ ƢƐƢƞơƟ, ǒƣƣƜƪƔ ƘǮƤ ƦƮƢơƟ ƕƔƞƞƮμƘƟơƟ ƝƔȴ ƢƧƣơƯμƘƟơƟ ȏƢȶ Ʀơʝ ǟƞƒơƧ… Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ ǒƣƜơƟ Iuntina (L): Ʀȶ ǒƣƜơƟ, ƨƚƥƒ Turnebus (T) 2 ƘǮƤ Turnebus (T): ȏƢȶ Iuntina (L) ƕƔƞƞƮμƘƟơƟ ƝƔȴ ƢƧƣơƯμƘƟơƟ Turnebus (T): ƝƔƦƔƞƔμƕƔƟƮμƘƟơƟ Iuntina (L)

His own conjectures cannot be ignored in the constitution of the text, and include many of those which editors have constantly misattributed to Brunck.44 40 ƆơƨơƝƞƐơƧƤ Ɣǯ ǏƢƦȮ ƦƣƔƖʪƗƒƔƜ. Sophoclis tragoediae septem una cum omnibus

Graecis scholiis & cum Latinis Ioach. Camerarii. Annotationes Henrici Stephani in Sophoclem & Euripidem seorsum excusae, simul prodeunt, 1568. 41 For example, sch. 140.3 ƢƔƣơƣɲ ƦȶƟ ... ƢƔʎƗƔ, 172.11 ƗȰ addidit, 503.2 ƦƒƟƘƤ, 575.3 ƝƔƦƔƝƚƞơʝƟ, 1259.4 ƥƘƔƧƦʀƤ and ƝƘƝơƞƞƚμƐƟơƟ. This edition gave Estienne the opportunity for other kinds of improvement too: at e.g. sch. 29a.2 he printed ƕƏƛƘƜ to replace the misprint ǢƛƘƜ of his predecessors. 42 He printed the Juntine (i.e. Lascaris, i.e. L) version of e.g. sch. 71, 86, 1259, but the Triclinian one of e.g. sch. 939. 43 Another example of hybridisation is his treatment of sch. 1191+1192: ƃDzƦƚƤ źƚƟȶƤ ȓƪƜƥƦơƟ ƢƏƖơƟ] ȏƪƚƞȶƟ ȂƣơƤ ƦʀƤ ƃDzƦƚƤ. ƢɱƟ ƗȰ ȂƣơƤ ȂƣơƤ Ʀơʝ ŸƜȶƤ ǾƟơμƏƙƘƦƔƜ, ǎƢƘƒ, ƨƔƥƒƟ, ȏƪƒƥƦʪ ȂƟƦƜ Ʀʭ ƛƘʭ, ǎƟ ȓƪƘƜ ƗƘʎ ƦȮƤ ƛƧƥƒƔƤ ƢơƜƘʎƥƛƔƜ ƦȮƤ ƢƣȶƤ ƔȎƦƮƟ. A comparison with the corresponding apparatus criticus reveals what Estienne took from each version, and shows that the opening phrase, ȏƪƚƞȶƟ ȂƣơƤ ƦʀƤ ƃDzƦƚƤ, is an invention of his own. 44 Sch. 24.1 Ʀʭ Stephanus 331: Ʀȶ L: om. R; 65.1 ƗƜƔƦƣƒƕơƟƦơƤ Stephanus 333: ƗƜƔƦƣƒƕơƟƦƔ Lrr: ƗƜƔƦƣƒƕơƟƦƜ (ex μơƜ scholii 64 pendet) T; 172.11 post ƗȰ add. ƘǮƤ Ʀȶ Stephanus 337; 794b.2 ƔȎƦʭ Stephanus 359; 841a.3 ǎƢȴ Ʀʭ Stephanus 361: ǎƢȴ Ʀȶ L: om. T; 841–5.4 ǎƢȴ Ʀʭ Stephanus 361: ǎƢȴ Ʀȶ L; 866.1 μƐƖƔƟ Stephanus 362:

48

Introduction

3.5 Brunck45 R.F.P. Brunck shares with H. Estienne the feature that he drew on Triclinius for his edition of the scholia vetera, but unlike his predecessor, he had access to the primary source of the Triclinian work, the Paris manuscript 2711 (T). With the aid of this superior source, Brunck was able to make improvements which the limitations of Turnebus’ edition had denied to Estienne. For example, he restored the scholion 1b to the correct line of the tragedy, whereas Estienne could not have done this, quite simply because Turnebus had omitted the scholion.46 Apart from T and Lascaris which represented L for him, Brunck constituted his text by using the emendations of a number of scholars such as H. Estienne and B. Heath: ‘mendas plurimas sustuli, partim codicum mss. ope, partim eruditorum virorum monitu’ (vol. I p.v). He also conjectured readings himself both in the first47 and third (1788)48 editions of his work. With regard to his treatment of the Lascaris and Triclinian version, his approach is similar to Estienne’s. When Lascaris (L) and T give different versions of the same scholion, Brunck would normally offer only one of them, but would occasionally print both: e.g. with regard to sch. 71, he put Lascaris’ version in his main text and relegated that of T to the foot of the page.49 Estienne’s tendency to create hybrid entities is also paralleled here,

μƐƖƔ codd.; 883.3 ƢƣơƥƘƦƣƒƪƔƦơ Stephanus 363: ƢƣơƘƦƣƒƪƔƦơ L; 1007a1.1 ǎƢȴ Ʀʭ Stephanus 367: ǎƢȴ Ʀȶ L; 1089–90.1 ǑƟ Stephanus 369: ǓƟƔ L: om. T; 1093b1.2 ȁ Stephanus 370: ȁƟ codd. 45 Sophoclis quae extant omnia cum veterum grammaticorum scholiis. Superstites tragoedias VII, ad optimorum exemplarium fidem recensuit, versione et notis illustravit, deperditarum fragmenta collegit Rich. Franc. Phil. Brunck, vol. I (continens Oedipos duos, Antigonam et Trachinias) – vol. II (continens Ajacem, Philoctetam et Electram), Argentorati 1786. 46 De Marco 1951, 25 thinks it more probable that Brunck drew on Adrianus Turnebus rather than directly on T for his ancient scholia. However, the fact that Brunck offers material which exists in T but not in the aforementioned edition is sufficient to establish that he did employ T in addition to Turnebus. De Marco’s hypothesis is also disproved by Brunck’s own statements on pages iii, v and vi of the Introduction to the first volume of his edition. 47 For example, sch. 344.2 ƦƏƤ, 355a.1 ƘDzƚ, 695a.2 ƝƔƦƔƞƔμƢƮμƘƟơƟ, 1177.1 ƗƘʎ addidit. 48 Sophoclis tragoediae septem cum scholiis veteribus, versione latina et notis. Accedunt deperditorum dramatum fragmenta. Ex editione R.F.Ph. Brunck, tom. II, Argentorati 1788. 49 For example, sch. 86 and 1259 are quoted from Lascaris, whereas sch. 939 from Triclinius.

3 Previous editions

49

but not necessarily in the same places,50 and there are cases in which Brunck incorporated exegetical notes of presumably Triclinian authorship into the corpus of the old scholia. For example, Lascaris’ scholion 82 is followed in his edition by an item which he derived from T: ǧƟƒƝŪ Ǡ ƥƘƥưƥμƘƛƔ. ƝƔƛŪ ȏƢƘƣƕƔƦȶƟ ƦơʝƦơ ƥƧƟƦƔƝƦƐơƟ. ǟƟƒƝƔ Ǡ ƥƘƥưƥμƘƛƔ, Ʀơʝ ƥơʝ ƢƔƦƣȶƤ ƦȶƟ ƕƒơƟ ƥưƥƔƟƦơƤ, Ǡ ƢƒƢƦơμƘƟ, ǎƠơƞƫƞƮƦơƤ ǎƝƘƒƟơƧ, ƝƔȴ ơǮƩƮμƘƛƔ ǃμƔ, ǢƖơƧƟ ƢƒƢƦơμƘƟ ƝƔȴ ơǮƩƮμƘƛƔ. ǾƨƘƒƞƫƟ ƗȰ «ƝƔȴ ơǮƩƮμƘƛƔ» ƘǮƢƘʎƟ ƾƥƧƟƗƐƦƫƤ ǎƠƑƟƘƖƝƘƟ.

3.6 Papageorgiou51 Papageorgiou’s Teubner edition was based on L and, with regard to the Trachiniae scholia, the additional testimony of the Prague manuscript Lobkovická Roudnická Knihovna VI.Fe.43 (Lr).52 This second choice was unfortunate in that Lr is in fact an indirect descendant of L.53

50 For example, he follows Estienne in hybridising e.g. sch. 56–7 (… ȏƢȰƣ Ʀơʝ ƗơƝƘʎƟ ƝƔƞʬƤ ƢƣƏƦƦƘƜƟ ǎƝƘʎƟơƟ), but is alone in hybridising e.g. sch. 29b (he places ƦʬƟ ƢƮƟƫƟ after the infinitive, just as Triclinius does). 51 Scholia in Sophoclis tragoedias vetera, e codice laurentiano denuo collato edidit commentario critico instruxit indices adiecit Petrus N. Papageorgius, Lipsiae 1888. 52 Papageorgiou’s symbol for this manuscript is l. 53 See above, p. 14 with n. 5.

Textus criticus

ǖƝ ƦʀƤ džƢơƞƞơƗȻƣơƧ ŶƜƕƞƜơƛƑƝƚƤ ȏƢƮƛƘƥƜƤ

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ ƢƔƣƔƖƘƟȷμƘƟơƤ ƘǮƤ žƔƞƧƗʬƟƔ ƦȲƟ ƃǮƟȱƫƤ ƛƧƖƔƦȱƣƔ ŸƚƜȯƟƘƜƣƔƟ ǎμƟƚƥƦƘȹƥƔƦơ ƝƔȴ ƗƜƔƢƔƞƔȵƥƔƤ ȏƢȰƣ ƦʬƟ ƖȯμƫƟ ƔȎƦʀƤ ƢƣȶƤ džƩƘƞʭơƟ ƾƢƘƜƝƔƥƛƐƟƦƔ ƦƔȹƣʪ ƢƘƣƜȱƝƞƔƥƘ Ʀȶ ǓƦƘƣơƟ ƦʬƟ ƝƘƣȯƦƫƟŭ ƝƔȴ ƦȲƟ μȰƟ ŸƚƜȯƟƘƜƣƔƟ ƖƔμƘʎ, Ʀȶ ƗȰ ƝȱƣƔƤ džƩƘƞʭơƤ ƞƔμƕȯƟƘƜ ƗơȸƤ ƾƟƦȴ ƦơȹƦơƧ Ʀȶ ƦʀƤ džμƔƞƛƘȵƔƤ. džμȯƞƛƘƜƔ ƗȰ ǤƟ ŵǯμơƟȵơƧ ƛƧƖȯƦƚƣ, ǡ ƝȱƣƔƤ ƘǴƩƘ ƦƔȹƣơƧŭ ƦơʝƦơ Ɨȱ, ȟƤ ƉƘƣƘƝȹƗƚƤ ƨƚƥƒ, ƗȹƟƔμƜƟ ƘǴƩƘ ƦơƜƔȹƦƚƟ, ȣƥƦƘ ƢơƦȶƟ Ǡ ƕƣƫƦƮƟ, ȃƢƘƣ ǀƟ ƘȒƠƔƜƦȷ ƦƜƤ, ƢƔƣȱƩƘƜƟ ǂƢơƟơƟ. ƥƦƣƔƦƘȹƘƜ ƗȰ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ μƘƦȮ žƔƞƧƗƫƟȵƫƟ ǎƢȴ żƘƥƢƣƫƦơȸƤ ƝƔȴ ƢȷƞƜƟ ǏƞȺƟ ǚƨƧƣƔƟ, ǥƤ ǎƕƔƥȵƞƘƧƘ ƉȹƞƔƤ, džƥƦƧȷƩɾ, Ʀʁ ƦơȹƦơƧ ƛƧƖƔƦƣƒ, ƥƧƟƘƞƛȺƟ ƢƔƦȲƣ ƇƞƚƢơƞȱμơƧ ƖȵƟƘƦƔƜ. ƖƘƟơμȱƟƫƟ ƗȰ ƦơȹƦƫƟ ƘȎƫƩơȹμƘƟơƤ ƢƔƣȮ ƃǮƟƘʎ ƝơƟƗȹƞʪ ƢƔƒƥƔƤ ƾƢȱƝƦƘƜƟƘƟ ŹȒƟơμơƟ ƦȶƟ džƣƩƜƦȱƞơƧƤ ƢƔʎƗƔ ƝƔƦȮ ƩƘƜƣʬƟ ƗƜƗȷƟƦƔŭ ƥƧƖƖƘƟȲƤ ƗȰ ƃǮƟȱƫƤ ơȕƦơƤ. ƝƔȴ ǿ μȰƟ ƢƔƦȲƣ Ʀơʝ ƢƔƜƗȷƤ ƾƝơƧƥȵơƧ ƖƘƟơμȱƟơƧ Ʀơʝ ƥƧμƕƘƕƚƝȷƦơƤ ƥƧƟƘƖƟƫμȷƟƘƜŭ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ ƗȰ ƝƔƦȮ ƦȶƟ ƟȷμơƟ ƦȲƟ ƨƧƖȲƟ ȏƢơμȱƟƘƜƟ ǢƛƘƞƘƟ ƝƔȴ ƗƜȱƖƟƫ ƢƣȶƤ žȳƧƝƔ ƘǮƤ ƇƣƔƩʎƟƔ ƾƢƜȱƟƔƜ. ǂƖƫƟ ƗȰ ŸƚƜȯƟƘƜƣƔƟ ƘǮƤ ƢơƦƔμȶƟ ŹȒƚƟơƟ ǥƝƘƟ, ǎƟ ɣ ƝƔƛƘƙȷμƘƟơƤ ƁȱƥơƤ ǿ žȱƟƦƔƧƣơƤ ƦơȸƤ ƢƔƣƜȷƟƦƔƤ ƗƜƘƢȷƣƛμƘƧƘ μƜƥƛʭ, ƞȱƖƫƟ ƢƔƣȮ ƛƘʬƟ ƦƔƯƦƚƟ ƦȲƟ ƢơƣƛμƘȵƔƟ ƘǮƞƚƨȱƟƔƜ ƗƜȮ Ʀȶ ƗƒƝƔƜơƤ ƘǴƟƔƜ. ƔȎƦȶƤ μȰƟ ǿ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ ƦȶƟ ƢơƦƔμȶƟ ƗƜƐƕƚŭ ŸƚƬȯƟƘƜƣƔƟ ƗȰ μƜƥƛȶƟ ƔǮƦƚƛƘȴƤ ǎƢȱƦƣƘƪƘƟ Ɓȱƥʪ ƗƜƔƝơμȵƙƘƜƟ. ǿ ƗȰ ƗƜƔƢơƣƛμƘȹƫƟ ƔȎƦȲƟ ǎƢƘƩƘȵƣƘƜ ƕƜȯƙƘƥƛƔƜ. ƦʀƤ ƗȰ ƾƟƔƝƣƔƖơȹƥƚƤ ƔǮƥƛȷμƘƟơƤ ǎƠƘƞƛȷƟƦƔ ƁȱƥơƟ ǎƦȷƠƘƧƥƘƟ ƘǮƤ ƦȲƟ ƝƔƣƗȵƔƟ. ǿ ƗȰ μȱƞƞƫƟ ƦƘƞƘƧƦɱƟ ƢƣơƥƝƔƞƘƥȯμƘƟơƤ ŸƚƜȯƟƘƜƣƔƟ ƘǴƢƘ ƦƚƣƘʎƟ ƞƔƕơʝƥƔƟ ǎƟ ƝƮƩƞʪ, ƘǮ ƛȱƞơƜ ƢƣȶƤ ǧƣƔƝƞȱƔ ƨƜƞƒƔƟ ǒƩƘƜƟ, ƦȷƟ ƦƘ ǮȶƟ ƾƨʀƝƘ ƝƔƦȮ ƦʀƤ ƝƮƩƞơƧ ƝƔȴ Ʀȶ ʜƧȰƟ ǎƝ Ʀơʝ ƦƣƔȹμƔƦơƤ ƦʀƤ ƾƝȵƗơƤ ƔǵμƔŭ ƥƧμμƒƠƔƤ ƗƐƗƫƝƘƟ. ǟ ƗȰ ƞƔƕơʝƥƔ ǎƨȹƞƔƦƦƘƟ ƢƔƣŪ ǏƔƧƦʁ. ƗƜƘƠƜȺƟ ƗȰ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ ƦȲƟ ŸƣƧȷƢƫƟ ƩȻƣƔƟ ƝƔȴ ƦƣơƨʀƤ ƾƢơƣʬƟ, ȏƢƔƟƦȳƥƔƟƦơƤ ƔȎƦʭ żƘƜơƗȯμƔƟƦơƤ ƕơƚƞƔƦơʝƟƦơƤ, ƦȶƟ ǓƦƘƣơƟ ƦʬƟ ƦƔȹƣƫƟ ƞƯƥƔƤ ƝƔȴ ƥƨƏƠƔƤ ƘȎƫƩƘʎƦơ. ȟƤ ƗȰ ǥƝƘƟ ƘǮƤ ƇƣƔƩʎƟƔ ƢƣȶƤ žȳƧƝƔ, ȏƢơƗƘƩƛƘȴƤ ȏƢŪ ƔȎƦơʝ ŸƣȹơƢƔƤ ƝƔƦƘƢơƞȱμƚƥƘƟ. ƔȔƛƜƤ ǎƝƘʎƛƘƟ ŵǮƖƜμȵʪ ƕƔƥƜƞƘʎ ƥƧƟƘμȯƩƚƥƘƟ ŸƫƣƜȱƫƟ· ſƔƢȵƛƔƜ ƖȮƣ ƢƘƣȴ ƖʀƤ ȃƣƫƟ ƢƣȶƤ ƔȎƦȶƟ ǎƢơƞȱμơƧƟ žơƣȻƟơƧ ƥƦƣƔƦƚƖơʝƟƦơƤ. ǿ ƗȰ ƢơƞƜơƣƝơȹμƘƟơƤ ǎƢƘƝƔƞȱƥƔƦơ ǧƣƔƝƞȱƔ ƕơƚƛȶƟ ǎƢȴ μȱƣƘƜ ƦʀƤ ƖʀƤ. ƕơƚƛȳƥƔƤ ƗȰ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ ƾƢȱƝƦƘƜƟƘƟ žȷƣƫƟơƟ μƘƦȮ ǂƞƞƫƟ, ƝƔȴ ƦȲƟ ƖʀƟ ǃƢƔƥƔƟ ǎƞƘƧƛȱƣƔƟ ǎƢơƒƚƥƘƟŭ ƾƢȱƝƦƘƜƟƘƟ ƗȰ ƝƔȴ ſƔƖȷƣƔƟ μƘƦȮ ƦʬƟ ƢƔƒƗƫƟ, ƕƔƥƜƞȱƔ ŸƣƧȷƢƫƟ, ǎƟ džƢȷƞƞƫƟơƤ ƦƘμȱƟƘƜ, ſƔƢƜƛʬƟ ƥȹμμƔƩơƟ.

54

40

45

50

55

60

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

ƢƔƣƜȷƟƦƔ ƗȰ ǺƦƫƟƔ ƘǮƤ μơƟơμƔƩȵƔƟ ƢƣơȎƝƔƞƘʎƦơ ƔȎƦȶƟ žȹƝƟơƤ NJƣƘƫƤ ƝƔȴ ƄƘƞơƢȵƔƤ· ƥƧƥƦȮƤ ƗȰ ƝƔȴ ƦơʝƦơƟ ƾƢȱƝƦƘƜƟƘƟ. ȟƤ ƗȰ ƘǮƤ ȆƣƩơμƘƟȶƟ ǥƝƘƟ, džμȹƟƦƫƣ ƔȎƦȶƟ ǿ ƕƔƥƜƞƘȸƤ ơȎƝ ƘDzƔƥƘƟ μƘƛŪ ȃƢƞƫƟ ƢƔƣƜƐƟƔƜŭ ƝƫƞƧȷμƘƟơƤ ƗȰ ƢƔƣƘƞƛƘʎƟ ƝƔȴ ƦơʝƦơƟ ƾƢȱƝƦƘƜƟƘƟ. ƾƨƜƝȷμƘƟơƤ ƗȰ ƘǮƤ ƇƣƔƩʎƟƔ ƥƦƣƔƦƘƒƔƟ ǎƢŪ ƃǮƩƔƞȵƔƟ ƥƧƟȳƛƣơƜƥƘƟ, ŹȒƣƧƦơƟ ƦƜμƫƣȳƥƔƥƛƔƜ ƛȱƞƫƟ. ƥƧμμƔƩơȹƟƦƫƟ Ɨ' džƣƝȯƗƫƟ ƔȎƦʭ ƝƔȴ ƀƚƞƜȱƫƟ ƦʬƟ ǎƝ ƇƣƔƩʎƟơƤ ƝƔȴ ſơƝƣʬƟ ƦʬƟ ǖƢƜƝƟƚμƜƗȵƫƟ, ƝƦƘȵƟƔƤ μƘƦȮ ƦʬƟ ƢƔȵƗƫƟ ŹȒƣƧƦơƟ, ƔǯƣƘʎ ƦȲƟ ƢȷƞƜƟ, ƝƔȴ ƛȯƪƔƤ ƦʬƟ ƥȸƟ ƔȎƦʭ ƥƦƣƔƦƘƧƥƔμȱƟƫƟ ƦơȸƤ ƾƢơƛƔƟȷƟƦƔƤ, ǻƢƢƔƥơƟ ƦȶƟ žȳƧƝơƤ ƝƔȴ džƣƖƘʎơƟ ƝƔȴ ƀȱƞƔƟƔ, ƦơȸƤ ſƜƝƧμƟȵơƧ ƢƔʎƗƔƤ, ƝƔȴ ƞƔƨƧƣƔƖƫƖȳƥƔƤ ƦȲƟ ƢȷƞƜƟ, ǤƖƘƟ ǶȷƞƚƟ ƔǮƩμȯƞƫƦơƟ. ƝƔȴ ƢƣơƥơƣμƜƥƛƘȴƤ žƚƟƔȵʪ, ƦʀƤ ŹȎƕơȵƔƤ ƾƝƣƫƦƚƣȵʪ, ŸƜȶƤ žƚƟƔȵơƧ ǯƘƣȶƟ ǯƗƣȹƥƔƦơ. μȱƞƞƫƟ ƗȰ ǯƘƣơƧƣƖƘʎƟ ƝȳƣƧƝƔ ǒƢƘμƪƘƟ ƞƔμƢƣȮƟ ǎƥƛʀƦƔ ơDzƥơƟƦƔ. ƢƔƣȮ ƦơȹƦơƧ ƗȰ ƦȮ ƢƘƣȴ ƦȲƟ ǶȷƞƚƟ ŸƚƬȯƟƘƜƣƔ ƢƧƛơμȱƟƚ ƝƔȴ ƗƘȵƥƔƥƔ μȲ ƢƏƞƜƟ ǎƝƘȵƟƚƟ ƾƖƔƢȳƥɾ, ƟơμȵƥƔƥƔ Ʀʁ ƾƞƚƛƘƒɯ ƨȵƞƦƣơƟ ƘǴƟƔƜ Ʀȶ ʜƧȰƟ ƔǵμƔ ƁȱƥơƧ, ƦơȹƦʪ ƦȶƟ ƩƜƦʬƟƔ ǒƩƣƜƥƘƟ. ǎƟƗȸƤ ƗȰ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ ǒƛƧƘƟ. ȟƤ ƗȰ ƛƘƣμƔƟƛȱƟƦơƤ Ʀơʝ ƩƜƦʬƟơƤ ǿ ǮȶƤ ƦʀƤ ȓƗƣƔƤ ǞƥƛƒƘƦơ, ƦȶƟ μȰƟ ſȵƩƔƟ ƝƔƦƐƕƔƞƘƟ, ƘǮƤ ƇƣƔƩʎƟƔ ƗȰ ǎƢȴ ƟƘȺƤ ƝơμȵƙƘƦƔƜ. ŸƚƬȯƟƘƜƣƔ ƗȰ ƾƩƛƘƥƛƘʎƥƔ ǏƔƧƦȲƟ ƾƟȳƣƦƚƥƘƟ. ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ ƗȰ ǎƟƦƘƜƞȯμƘƟơƤ țƞƞʪ, ȁƤ ƔȎƦʭ ǎƝ ŸƚƬƔƟƘȵƣƔƤ ǤƟ ƢƔʎƤ ƢƣƘƥƕȹƦƘƣơƤ, ƦȲƟ ǶȷƞƚƟ ƾƟƗƣƫƛȱƟƦƔ ƖʀμƔƜ, ƢƔƣƔƖƘƟȷμƘƟơƤ ƘǮƤ ƃDzƦƚƟ ȃ ǎƥƦƜƟ ȂƣơƤ ƇƣƔƩʎƟơƤ, ƢƧƣȮƟ ƢơƜȳƥƔƤ, ǎƝȱƞƘƧƥƘƟ ǎƢƜƕȮƤ ȏƨȯƢƦƘƜƟ. Ʀơʝ ƗȰ μȲ ƛƐƞơƟƦơƤ, ƄơȵƔƤ ƢƔƣƜȺƟ ǎƢȴ ƙȳƦƚƥƜƟ ƢơƜμƟȵƫƟ ȏƨƏƪƔƤ ǒƞƔƕƘ ƦȮ ƦƮƠƔ ƢƔƣ' ƔȎƦơʝ ƗƫƣƘƏƟ. ƝƔƜơμȱƟƚƤ ƗȰ ƦʀƤ ƢƧƣɱƤ ƞȱƖƘƦƔƜ ƟȱƨơƤ ȏƢơƥƦȮƟ μƘƦȮ ƕƣơƟƦʀƤ ƘǮƤ ơȎƣƔƟȶƟ ƾƢơƢȱμƪƔƜ ǒƟƛƔ ƦƧƩȺƟ ƾƛƔƟƔƥȵƔƤ ƖƑμƔƤ ʕŻƕƚƟ ƦȲƟ ʕŻƣƔƤ ƛƧƖƔƦȱƣƔ ƢơƜƘʎ ƢƔʎƗƔƤ džƞƘƠƜȯƣƚƟ ƝƔȴ džƟȵƝƚƦơƟ. L a(AUY) V r(MR) T 7 ƉƘƣƘƝƯƗƚƤ: FGrHist 3 F 42 1 tit.] ƆơƨơƝƞƐơƧƤ ƇƣƔƩƜƟƜʬƟ (sic) ȏƢƮƛƘƥƜƤ ŵU: ȗƢƮƛƘƥƜƤ ƇƣƔƩƜƟƒƫƟ (-ƜʬƟ r) ƆơƨơƝƞƐơƧƤ, ǎƝ ƦʀƤ džƢơƞƞơƗưƣơƧ ŶƜƕƞƜơƛƑƝƚƤ Vrr: ǎƝ ƦʀƤ džƢơƞƞơƗưƣơƧ ƕƜƕƞƜơƛƑƝƚƤ Ʀơʝ ƗƣƏμƔƦơƤ ǟ ȏƢƮƛƘƥƜƤ Ƈ: om. Y 2 ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ] ƣƔƝƞʀƤ r 3 ƗƜƔƢƔƞƔȵƥƔƤ Lp.c.aVƇ: ƗƜƔƢƔƞƐƥƔƤ La.c.: ƗƜƔƢƘƞƏƥƔƤ r ȏƢȰƣ – 4 ƾƢƘƜƝƔƥƛƐƟƦƔ om. V 3 ƔȎƦʀƤ] ƔȎƦơʝ ƀ 4 džƩƘƞʭơƟ] ƦȶƟ džƩ. a 4–5 Ʀȶ ǓƦƘƣơƟ ƦʬƟ ƝƘƣƏƦƫƟ a: Ʀȶ ƥƦƘƣȶƟ ƦʬƟ ƝƘƣƏƦƫƟ L: Ʀȶ ƥƦƘƣƣȶƟ ƦʬƟ ƝƘƣƏƦƫƟ ƔȎƦơʝ V: ƦʬƟ ƝƘƣƏƦƫƟ Ʀȶ ƥƦƘƣƣƮƟ r: Ʀȶ ƾƣƜƥƦƘƣȶƟ ƦʬƟ ƝƘƣƏƦƫƟ ƔȎƦơʝ Ƈ 5 džƩƘƞʭơƤ] džƖƩƘƞʭơƤ V 6 džμƏƞƛƘƜƔ ſVƇ: džμƔƞƛƘƒƔ, hoc accentu, ar: džμƔƞƛƘƜƔ, sine accentu, L ŵǯμơƟȵơƧ aT: ƔǯμƫƟƒơƧ V: ƔǯμƔƟƒơƧ Lrr 7 ƦƔȹƣơƧŭ ƦơʝƦơ Ɨȱ om. R ƗƯƟƔμƜƟ] ƗƯƟƔμƜƟ μȰƟ R 8 ƦơƜƔȹƦƚƟ] ƦơƜƔƯƦƚ R ƢơƦȶƟ Ǡ ƕƣƫƦȶƟ inv. ordine T 9 ǂƢơƟơƟ] ǂƨƛơƟơƟ Apollodorus: ǂƨƛơƟƮƟ ƦƘ ƝƔȴ ǂƢơƟơƟ T ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ] ǿ ǧƣ. ƀ 10 ǏƞȺƟ Us.l. et cett.:

ǖƝ ƦʀƤ džƢơƞƞơƗȻƣơƧ ŶƜƕƞƜơƛƑƝƚƤ ȏƢƮƛƘƥƜƤ

55

ƞƔƕȺƟ U in linea ǚƨƧƣƔƟ] ǖƨƯƣƔƟ V: ǚƨƧƣƥƔƟ ƀ ǎƕƔƥƒƞƘƧƘ ƉƯƞƔƤ] ǎƕƔƥƒƞƘƧƥƘƟ ǖƨƯƞƔƤ ƀ 12 ƘȎƫƩơƯμƘƟơƤ] ƘȎƫƩƜμƐƟơƤ ƀ ƃǮƟƘʎ] ƃǮƝƘʎ ƀ ƢƔƒƥƔƤ] ƦƔƒƥƔƤ ƀ ƾƢƐƝƦƘƜƟƘƟ] ƾƟƘʎƞƘƟ T 13 ƗƜƗƮƟƦƔ] ƝƯƞƜƝƔ Ɨ. T ƃǮƟƐƫƤ ơȕƦơƤ] ơȕƦơƤ (ǤƟ add. T) ƃǮƟƐƫƤ (ƃǮƟƐơƟ V), inv. ordine, VaaTrr ƝƔȴ] ƾƞƞŪ T 15 ƥƧƟƘƖƟƫμȷƟƘƜ] ƥƧƟƘƖƟơμȷƟƘƜ R ƦȲƟ om. VaarT ƨƧƖȲƟ] ƨƧƖƘʎƟ r 16 ƗƜƐƖƟƫ LVrrT (cave Wagner credas ƗȲ ǒƖƟƫ praebere L): ƗȲ ǒƖƟƫ a ƢƣȶƤ žȳƧƝƔ om. R ƇƣƔƩʎƟƔ aVrrT (nisi quod –Ʃƒ-, hoc accentu, rU): ƇƣƔƩƒƟƔƟ L 17 ƘǮƤ] ǎƢȴ T ǥƝƘƟ] ǤƞƛƘƟ aT: ƾƟʀƞƛƘƟ Vrr ƁȱƥơƤ] ƁȱƥơƤ, cum simplici ƥ, constanter codd. 18 μƜƥƛʭ] μƜƥƛơʝ Apollodorus (Epitoma vaticana): μƜƥƛƮƟ, cum ƦȲƟ ƢơƣƘƒƔƟ (v.l. in a pro ƦȲƟ ƢơƣƛμƘƒƔƟ) construendum, aT 19 ƢơƣƛμƘƒƔƟ] ƢơƣƘƒƔƟ aVrrT ƗƒƝƔƜơƤ] – ơƟ T ƔȎƦȶƤ μȰƟ ǿ] ƔȎƦȶƤ μȰƟ ơȔƟ a: ƔȎƦȶƤ μȰƟ ơȔƟ ǿ Vrr: ƝƔȴ ƔȎƦȶƤ μȰƟ ǿ T 21 ǎƢƐƦƣƘƪƘƟ ƁƐƥʪ] ǎƢƐƥƦƣƘƪƘƟ ƘǮƤ Ʀȶ V ƗƜƔƢơƣƛμƘƯƫƟ] ƢơƣƛμƘƯƫƟ aVrr 22 ƕƜƏƙƘƥƛƔƜ] ƕƏƙƘơƧƤ (sic) ƀ ƾƟƔƝƣƔƖơƯƥƚƤ] ƾƟƔƝƣƔƙơƯƥƚƤ Ƈ ƔǮƥƛƮμƘƟơƤ] ƔǮƥƛƮμƘƟơƟ V: om. r post ƔǮƥƛƮμƘƟơƤ habet ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ T, Apollodorus, quod recepit Dindorf 22, at facile subauditur ƁȱƥơƟ] ƁƐƥơƟƔ R 23 ƦƘƞƘƧƦɱƟ] ƦƘƞƘƧƦʬƟ V: ƢƞƘƯƥ R 24 ŸƚƜƏƟƘƜƣƔƟ] ƦȲƟ Ÿ. V ƞƔƕơʝƥƔƟ om. V post ǎƟ ƝƮƩƞʪ add. ƗƜȮ ƨƒƞƦƣơƟ V ƝƮƩƞʪ] ƝƮƞƩʪ r ƛƐƞơƜ] –ƘƜ T ƢƣȶƤ – 25 ƨƜƞƒƔƟ] ƨƒƞƦƣơƟ ƢƔƣŪ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ T de sensu ƨƜƞƒƔ h.l. vide LSJ s.v. I.3 24–5 ƘǮ – ƝƮƩƞơƧ om. Vrr 25 ȁƟ addidi 26 pronomen ǁ addidi ante quod interpunxi ƗƐƗƫƝƘƟ] ǒƗƫƝƘƟ T idque recepit Brunck1, sed vide ad sch. 1a.11 27 ƢƔƣŪ erasum in L ǏƔƧƦʁ] ƔȎƦʁ V ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ] ǿ ǧƣ. V 28 ȏƢƔƟƦȳƥƔƟƦơƤ ƔȎƦʭ (ƔȎƦʭ om. T) żƘƜơƗȯμƔƟƦơƤ ƕơƚƞƔƦơʝƟƦơƤ aT et r (nisi quod pro żƘƜơƗƏμƔƟƦơƤ habet ŸƘƜơƗƏμƔƟƦơƤ M): ȏƢƔƟƦƑƥƔƟƦƔ ƔȎƦơʝ żƘƜơƗƏμƔƟƦƔ ƕơƚƞƔƦơʝƟƦƔ L: ƾƢƔƦƑƥƔƟƦơƤ ƔȎƦơʝ żƘơƗƏμƔƟƦƔ ƕơƚƞƔƦơʝƟƦƔ V 28–9 ƦȶƟ ǓƦƘƣơƟ] ƦʬƟ ǏƦƐƣƫƟ V 29 ƘȎƫƩƘʎƦơ] ƘȎƫƩƑƥƔƦơ T 30 ƇƣƔƩʎƟƔ aVrrT: ƇƣƔƩƒƟƔƟ L ut supra (16), sed infra (41) recte ƇƣƔƩʎƟƔ ȏƢơƗƘƩƛƘȴƤ erasum in L 31 ƔȔƛƜƤ] ƔȔƛ. ƗȰ VrrT ǎƝƘʎƛƘƟ] ǎƝ. ǿƣμƚƛƘȴƤ T ŵǮƖƜμƒʪ] ŵǮƖƜμƒƫƟ ƀ ŸƫƣƜȱƫƟ] erasum in L: ante ƥƧƟƘμƏƩƚƥƘƟ transp. T ſƔƢƒƛƔƜ] ſƔƢƒƥƔƜ, sic, M 32 žơƣȻƟơƧ] žơƣưƗơƧ R: žƮƣơƧ Ƈ 33 ƢơƞƜơƣƝơȹμƘƟơƤ] ƢơƞƧơƣƝơƯμƘƟơƤ R ǧƣƔƝƞƐƔ ƕơƚƛȶƟ] ƗƜƏƢơƣơƟ (sic; voluit fortasse ƗƜƏƝơƟơƟ) ǢƦơƜ ƕơƚƛȶƟ ǧƣƔƝƞƐƔ V μƐƣƘƜ] μƐƣơƤ V: μƐƣƚ ƀR 34 ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ] ǿ ǧƣ. T žƮƣƫƟơƟ] žƮƣơƟ T ǂƞƞƫƟ] ƝƔȴ ǂƞ. Ƈ ƖʀƟ] ƖʀƟ ƗȰ V 35 ſƔƖƮƣƔƟ codd. Apollodori: džƞƞƔƖƮƣƔƟ LaaVrr: džƞƔƖƮƣƔƟ T 36 ƢƔƒƗƫƟ] ƦƐƝƟƫƟ ƔȎƦơʝ T ƕƔƥƜƞȱƔ] ƕƔƥƜƞƐƫƤ r post ƦƘμƐƟƘƜ add. ƗƔƜƟƟƯμƘƟơƟ ȏƕƣƜƥƦȲƟ ȂƟƦƔ ƝƔȴ T ſƔƢƜƛʬƟ] ƞƔƢƒƛƫƟ LaaVrrT, codd. Apollodori 37 ƢƔƣƜƮƟƦƔ ƗȰ ǺƦƫƟƔ] ƢƔƣƜƮƟƦƔ ǺƦƫƟƔ ƗȰ ƢƔƣƜƮƟƦƔ V ƢƣơȎƝƔƞƘʎƦơ] ƢƣơƝƔƞƘʎƦƔƜ T NJƣƘƫƤ] ǿ NJƣ. aT (NJƣƘơƤ T) 38 ƥƧƥƦȮƤ] ƣƧƥƦȮƤ ƀ ƦơʝƦơƟ] ƦơʝƦơ ǎƟ R ȆƣƩơμƘƟȶƟ LaaƀT, error repetitus ex codd. Apollodori: ȆƣμȱƟƜơƟ Apollodoro restituit Wesseling ad Diod. Sic. IV 37: ȆƣƩơμƐƟƚƟ R 39 džμȹƟƦƫƣ] džμƯƟƦƫƟ V: ƾμƏƦƫƣ r ơȎƝ ƘDzƔƥƘƟ μƘƛŪ ȃƢƞƫƟ ƢƔƣƜƐƟƔƜ] ƗƜƘƞƛƘʎƟ ơȎƝ ƘDzƔƥƘƟ μƘƛŪ ȃƢƞƫƟ V: μƘƛŪ ȃƢƞƫƟ ơȎƝ ƘDzƔƥƘƟ ƗƜƐƣƩƘƥƛƔƜ T 40 ƝƫƞƧȷμƘƟơƤ] ƝơƞƧƮμƘƟơƤ R 41 ƥƦƣƔƦƘƒƔƟ LaaT, ex codd. Apollodori repetitum: ƥƦƣƔƦƜȮƟ V (coni. Brunck1) ƃǮƩƔƞȵƔƟ] ǦƩƔƞƒƔƟ ƀ: ƊƔƞƒƔƟ R ŹȒƣƧƦơƟ] ŹȒƣƚƦơƟ r 42 Ɨ' džƣƝȯƗƫƟ ƔȎƦʭ] ƗȰ ƔȎƦʭ džƣƝȯƗƫƟ Vrr 43–4 ƦʬƟ ǖƢƜƝƟƚμƜƗƒƫƟ – ŹȒƣƧƦơƟ om. a 44 ƔǯƣƘʎ aT: ƔDzƣƘƜ L: ƔǯƣƘʎ (ƔǮ- ƀ) ƝƔȴ Vrr 44– 5 ƦʬƟ ƥȸƟ ƔȎƦʭ ƥƦƣƔƦƘƧƥƔμȱƟƫƟ ƦơȸƤ om. spatio vacuo relicto R 45 ǻƢƢƔƥơƟ –

56

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

ƀȱƞƔƟƔ om. Vrr ƦơȸƤ T: Ʀơʝ ſa: ƦơƧ sine accentu L: ƔȎƦơʝ Ʀơʝ Vrr 46 ƞƔƨƧƣƔƖƫƖȳƥƔƤ] ƩƘƜƣƔƖƫƖƑƥƔƤ ƀ: ƣƔƖƫƖȳƥƔƤ R 47 ƔǮƩμƏƞƫƦơƟ – 49 ǶƮƞƚƟ om. V 47 žƚƟƔƒʪ] žƚƟƟƔƒʪ T qui etiam ŸƜȶƤ žƚƟƟƔƒơƧ praebet ƦʀƤ] Ʀʭ r ƾƝƣơƦƚƣƒʪ ƀ 47–8 ƾƝƣƫƦƚƣȵʪ, ŸƜȶƤ žƚƟƔȵơƧ ǯƘƣȶƟ ǯƗƣƯƥƔƦơ om. spatio vacuo relicto R 48 ǯƗƣȹƥƔƦơ aƀT: ǯƗƣȹƥƔƟƦơ L ƝƑƣƧƝƔ] ƘǮƤ žƑƧƝƔ a: ƘǮƤ ƝȳƣƧƝƔ r: ƘǮƤ ƇƣƔƩʎƟƔ ƦȶƟ žƑƧƝƔ T ǒƢƘμƪƘƟ] ƢƐμƪƔƜ r 49 ǎƥƛʀƦƔ aT: ƔǮƥƛʀƦƔ Lrr ƦơȹƦơƧ ƗȰ] ƗȰ ƦơȹƦơƧ rT ŸƚƜƏƟƘƜƣƔ] Ÿ. ƗȰ V 50 ƗƘƒƥƔƥƔ] ƗƘƒƥơƧƥƔ ƀ ƢƏƞƜƟ ǎƝƘƒƟƚƟ] ǎƝƘƒƟƚƟ μɱƞƞơƟ T ƾƖƔƢȳƥɾ] ƾƖƔƢƑƥƘƜ ƀ: ƾƖƔƢʀƥƔƜ R ƟơμȵƥƔƥƔ] in rasura in L: ƟơμƑƥƔƥƔ ƀ 51 ƘǴƟƔƜ om. V ƦơƯƦʪ] ƦơƯƦơƧ V 52 ǎƟƗȸƤ ƗȰ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ ǒƛƧƘƟ T (ex Apollodoro): om. cett. ǿ ǮȶƤ – 54 ƾƩƛƘƥƛƘʎƥƔ] haec ita rescripsit T ǿ ƦʀƤ ȓƗƣƔƤ ǮȶƤ ƦȶƟ ƩƣʬƦƔ ǒƥƚƢƘ, ƦȶƟ μȰƟ ſƒƩƔƟ ƦʬƟ ƢơƗʬƟ ƾƣƏμƘƟơƤ ƝƔƦƚƝƮƟƦƜƥƘƟ ƾƢȶ ƦʀƤ ŶơƜƫƦƒƔƤ, ƦȶƟ ƗȰ ƩƜƦʬƟƔ ƾƢƐƥƢƔ ƢƣơƥƢƘƨƧƝƮƦƔ Ʀʭ ƥưμƔƦƜ, ƥƧƟƔƢƘƥƢʬƟƦơ ƗȰ ƝƔȴ Ɣǯ ƥƏƣƝƘƤ ƔȎƦʭ. ƦơƜƔƯƦɾ ƗȰ ƥƧμƨơƣɲ ƝƔƦƔƥƩƘƛƘȴƤ ƘǮƤ ƇƣƔƩʎƟƔ ǎƢȴ ƟƘȺƤ ƝơμƒƙƘƦƔƜ. ŸƚƜƏƟƘƜƣƔ ơȔƟ ƔǮƥƛơμƐƟƚ Ʀȶ ƖƘƖơƟȶƤ 54 ƗȰ] ȟƤ V ƾƩƛƘƥƛƘʎƥƔ] ƾƩƘƥƛƘʎƥƔ r ǏƔƧƦȲƟ ƾƟƑƣƦƚƥƘƟ] ǏƔƧƦȶƟ ƾƟƑƣƢƔƥƘƟ V 55 post ȁƤ add. ǀƟ R ǎƝ] ǎƝ ƦʀƤ Vƀ: ǎƝ ǎƟ ƦʀƤ (sic) R ǤƟ om. R ƢƔʎƤ om. Vrr 56 ƾƟƗƣƫƛƐƟƦƔ ƖʀμƔƜ] ƾƟƗƣƫƛȰƟ ƖʀμƔ sic M post ƢƔƣƔƖƘƟƮμƘƟơƤ add. ƗȰ a 57 ante ƢƧƣȮƟ add. ǎƝƘʎ T ǎƢƜƕȮƤ] ǎƢƜƕʀƤ ƀ 57–8 Ʀơʝ ƗȰ μȲ ƛƐƞơƟƦơƤ] μƚƗƘƟȶƤ ƗȰ ƦơʝƦơ ƢƣƏƦƦƘƜƟ ǎƛƐƞơƟƦơƤ T 58 ƢƔƣƜȺƟ] ƢƔƣȺƟ ƀ ǎƢȴ ƙƑƦƚƥƜƟ] ƝƔƦȮ ƙ. T 59 ƦƮƠƔ] ƦƐƝƟƔ r ƢƔƣŪ – ƗƫƣƘƏƟ om. V ƢƔƣŪ om. r ƢƧƣɱƤ] ƨƞơƖȶƤ a 60 post ƕƣơƟƦʀƤ add. ƔȎƦȶƟ T et Apollodorus (recepit Dindorf 24, sed facile subauditur) ƾƢơƢƐμƪƔƜ LVrr, cf. sch. 1a.20–1 μƘƦȮ ƦƜμʀƤ ƾƢƐƢƘμƪƘƟ žƣơʎƥơƟ: ƾƟƔƢȱμƪƔƜ aT Apollodorus 61–2 ƖƑμƔƤ – fin.] haec ita rescripsit T ƝƔȴ ƗƜƔƞƞƔƖƘȴƤ ǫƣɯ ƦȲƟ ǎƝƘƒƟƚƤ ƛƧƖƔƦƐƣƔ ǫƕƚƟ ǒƖƚμƘƟ ǎƠ ǥƤ ƔȎƦʭ ƢƔʎƗƘƤ džƞƞƘƠƜƏƣƚƤ ƝƔȴ džƟƒƝƚƦơƤ ǎƖƐƟơƟƦơ 61 džƞƘƠƜȯƣƚƟ] džƞƘƠƒƗƚƟ V: džƞƘƠƜƏƟƚƟ ƀ: džƞơƠƜȯƣƚƟ R 62 džƟƒƝƚƦơƟ] džƟƑƝƚƦơƟ ƀ

ƇȮ Ʀơʝ ƗƣƏμƔƦơƤ ƢƣƮƥƫƢƔ ŸƚƜƏƟƘƜƣƔ, ƗơƯƞƚ ƦƣơƨƮƤ, țƞƞơƤ, ƩơƣȶƤ ƖƧƟƔƜƝʬƟ ƇƣƔƩƜƟƒƫƟ, ǂƖƖƘƞơƤ, ſƒƩƔƤ, ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ, ƢƣƐƥƕƧƤ. L a(AUY) V r(MR) T 2 ƗơƯƞƚ ƦƣơƨƮƤ] ƗơƯƞƚ, ƦƣơƨƮƤ r: ƛƘƣƏƢƔƜƟƔ, ƦƣơƨƮƤ V: ƛƘƣƏƢƔƜƟƔ T țƞơƤ Y ƖƧƟƔƜƝʬƟ ƇƣƔƩƜƟƒƫƟ] ǎƢƜƩƫƣƒƫƟ V: om. T: ƢƔƣƛƐƟƫƟ ƇƣƔƩƜƟƒƫƟ Scaliger 330 prob. Valckenaer2 403 coll. e.g. v. 211 fabulae ǂƖƖƘƞơƤ] ǂƖƘƞƞơƤ Y 3 post ſƒƩƔƤ add. ƦƣơƨƮƤ T ƢƣƐƥƕƧƤ] ƝƔȴ ƢƣƐƥƕƧƤ r: om. V

ǖƝ ƦʀƤ džƢơƞƞơƗȻƣơƧ ŶƜƕƞƜơƛƑƝƚƤ ȏƢƮƛƘƥƜƤ – njƛƞơƜ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ

57

njƛƞơƜ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ ƔŪ ƕŪ ƖŪ 5 ƗŪ ƘŪ ƳŪ ƙŪ ƚŪ 10 ƛŪ ƜŪ ƜƔŪ ƜƕŪ ƜƖŪ 15

ƄƣʬƦƔ μȰƟ ǎƟ ƁƘμȱɾ ƕƣƜƔƣȶƟ ƝƔƦȱƢƘƨƟƘ ƞȱơƟƦƔ· ƗƘȹƦƘƣơƟ ǎƟ ſȱƣƟɾ ƢơƞƧƔȹƩƘƟơƟ ǒƝƦƔƟƘƟ ȓƗƣƔƟ· Ʀȶ ƦƣȵƦơƟ ƔȔƦŪ ǎƢȴ ƦơʎƤ ǖƣƧμȯƟƛƜơƟ ǒƝƦƔƟƘ ƝȯƢƣơƟ· ȏƪƒƝƘƣƫƟ ƗŪ ǒƞƔƨơƟ μƘƦȮ ƦƔʝƦŪ ǢƖƣƘƧƥƘ ƦȱƦƔƣƦơƟ· ƢȱμƢƦơƟ ƗŪ ȂƣƟƜƛƔƤ ƆƦƧμƨƚƞȵƗƔƤ ǎƠƘƗȵƫƠƘƟ· ǓƝƦơƟ džμƔƙơƟȵƗơƤ ƝȷμƜƥƘ ƙƫƥƦʀƣƔ ƨƔƘƜƟȷƟ· ǓƕƗơμơƟ ŵȎƖƘȵơƧ ƢơƞƞȲƟ ƝȷƢƣơƟ ǎƠƘƝȯƛƚƣƘƟ· ȂƖƗơơƟ ǎƝ žƣȳƦƚƤ ƗȰ ƢƧƣȵƢƟơơƟ ǢƞƔƥƘ ƦƔʝƣơƟ· ǎƝ żƣɿƝƚƤ ǒƟƔƦơƟ ŸƜơμȳƗƘơƤ ǢƞƔƥƘƟ dzƢƢơƧƤ· ŷƚƣƧȷƟơƤ ƗȱƝƔƦơƟ ƕȷƔƤ ǢƞƔƥƘƟ ǎƠ ǖƣƧƛƘȵƚƤ· ǏƟƗȱƝƔƦơƟ ƗŪ ƾƟƏƖƘƜ ƝȹƟƔ žȱƣƕƘƣơƟ ǎƠ džȵƗƔơ· ƗƫƗƐƝƔƦơƟ ƗŪ ǢƟƘƖƝƘƟ ǎƤ ǗƞƞƏƗƔ ƩƣƯƥƘƔ μʀƞƔ. żƘƥƢƒơƧ ƛƧƖƔƦƣʬƟ ƦƣƜƥƝƔƜƗƐƝƔƦơƤ ƢƐƞƘƟ DŽƛƞơƤ LT

1 tit. om. T 2 ƁƘμƐɾ] ƁƘμƔƒɯ T ƕƣƜƔƣȶƟ] ƕƣƧƔƣȶƟ T 3 ǎƟ ſƐƣƟɾ L in linea: ǎƝ ſƐƣƟƚƤ Ls.l. ǒƝƦƔƟƘƟ L in linea et T: ȢƞƘƥƘƟ Ls.l. a manu recentissima (fortasse, ex AP 16.92 (Plan.)) 5 ȏƪƒƝƘƣƫƟ L in linea et T: ƩƣƧƥƮƝƘƣƫƟ Ls.l. a m. rec. (fortasse, ex AP 16.92 (Plan.)) ƗŪ quod est in LT neglexit Dindorf 24 6 ƆƦƧμƨƚƞƒƗƔƤ Brunck1, fortasse ex AP 16.92 (Plan.): ƆƦƧμƨƘƞƞƒƗƔƤ L: ƆƦƧƨƘƞƒƗƫƟ T 7 ǓƝƦơƟ] ǓƝ. ƗŪ T 8 ƢơƞƞȲƟ om. L in linea; superscripsit m. rec. 9–10 versus ita praebet T ȂƖƗơơƟ ǎƝ żƣƑƝƚƤ ŸƜơμƑƗƘơƤ ǢƞƔƥƘƟ dzƢƢơƧƤ / ǒƟƔƦơƟ ǎƝ žƣƑƦƚƤ ƢƧƣƒƢƟơơƟ ǢƞƔƥƘ ƦƔʝƣơƟ 9 versum om. L in linea; superscripsit m. rec. 11 ŷƚƣƧƮƟơƤ L in linea: ŷƚƣƧƮƟơƧ Ls.l. a m. rec. et T 13 ǎƤ] ƘǮƤ T 14 żƘƥƢƒơƧ scripsi: żƘƥƦƜƐƫ LT ƦƣƜƥƝƔƜƗƐƝƔƦơƤ ... DŽƛƞơƤ T: ƦƣƜƥƝƔƜƗƐƝƔƦơƟ (sic Lp.c. a m. rec.: ƦƣƜƥƝƘƗƐƝƔƦơƟ La.c.) … ǂƘƛƞơƟ L

ƔŪ ƕŪ ƖŪ ƗŪ 5 ƘŪ ƳŪ ƙŪ ƚŪ ƛŪ 10 ƜŪ

ƦȶƟ ǎƟ ƁƘμƐɾ ƞƐơƟƦƔ ƦȲƟ ſƘƣƟƔƒƔƟ ȓƗƣƔƟ ƦȶƟ ǖƣƧμƏƟƛƜơƟ ƝƏƢƣơƟ ƦȲƟ ǒƞƔƨơƟ ƦȮƤ ƆƦƧμƨƘƞƞƒƗƔƤ ȂƣƟƜƛƔƤ ƦʀƤ džμƔƙƮƟơƤ ƦȲƟ ƝƮƢƣơƟ ŵȎƖƘƒơƧ ƦȶƟ žƣʀƦƔ ƦƔʝƣơƟ ƦơȸƤ dzƢƢơƧƤ ŸƜơμƑƗơƧƤ ƦȮƤ ŷƚƣƧƮƟơƤ ƕơʝƤ

58

ƜƔŪ ƜƕŪ ƜƖŪ

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

ƦȶƟ žƐƣƕƘƣơƟ ƝƯƟƔ ƦȮ ƩƣƧƥɱ μʀƞƔ ƦȲƟ ƥƧƟơƧƥƒƔƟ ƦʬƟ ƟŪ ƾƗƘƞƨʬƟ L

8 ƦȶƟ žƣʀƦƔ ƦƔʝƣơƟ scripsi: ƦơȸƤ dzƢƢơƧƤ ŸƜơμƑƗ repetit ex v. proximo ſ: om. linea vacua relicta L

Scholia vetera 1a ƞƮƖơƤ μƐƟ ǎƥƦŪ ƾƣƩƔʎơƤ: ǿ ƦƣƮƢơƤ ƾƟƔƩƣơƟƜƥμƮƤŭ μƘƦƔƖƘƟƐƥƦƘƣơƤ ƖȮƣ ǿ ƆƮƞƫƟŭ ƨƔƥȴƟ džƛƚƟƔƒơƧƤ ƔǮƦƑƥƔƥƛƔƜ ƆƮƞƫƟƔ ƟƮμơƧ ƖƣƔƨƑƟ, ƦȶƟ ƗȰ ƗƘƗƜƮƦƔ Ʀȶ ƿƪƒƝơƣơƟ ƔȎƦʬƟ ȃƣƝơƟ ƔǮƦʀƥƔƜ ƔȎƦơȸƤ ǎƢƜμƘƟƘʎƟ [ƗȰ] ƗƘƝƔƘƦƒƔƟ, ƢƔƣƘƧƞƔƕơƯμƘƟơƟ ƗȰ μƑƢơƦƘ μƐƟơƟƦƔ ƾƟƔƖƝƏƥƫƥƜ 5 μƘƦƔƛƘʎƟƔƒ ƦƜ ƦʬƟ ƟơμƒμƫƟ ƾƟƔƩƫƣʀƥƔƜ ƢƣȶƤ ſƧƗơȸƤ ƝƔȴ žƣơʎƥơƟ. ƗƘƠƏμƘƟơƤ ƗȰ ƔȎƦȶƟ ǿ žƣơʎƥơƤ ƗƘƒƝƟƧƥƜ ƢƏƟƦƔ ƦȶƟ ƢƞơʝƦơƟ ƝƔȴ ƥƦƣƔƦƜưƦƔƤ ǎƟ ȃƢƞơƜƤ ƩƣƧƥơʎƤ ƕƫμƮƟ ƦƘ džƢƮƞƞƫƟoƤ ǿƞƮƩƣƧƥơƟŭ ƝƔƧƩưμƘƟơƤ ƗȰ ǞƣưƦƔ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƦƒƤ ƢƏƟƦƫƟ ƾƟƛƣưƢƫƟ ƘȎƗƔƜμơƟƐƥƦƘƣơƤ, ǿ ƗȰ ǒƨƚ žƞƐơƕƜƟ ƝƔƜ ŶƒƦƫƟƔ. ƞƧƢƚƛƘȴƤ ƗȰ ǿ ƕƔƥƜƞƘȸƤ ǞƣưƦƔ ƦȶƟ ƦȮ 10 ƗƘƯƦƘƣƔ ƨƐƣơƟƦƔ. ƦơƯƦơƧ ƗȰ ƢƏƞƜƟ ǓƦƘƣơƟ ƢƣơƕƔƞơμƐƟơƧ ǞƖƔƟƏƝƦƚƥƘ žƣơʎƥơƤ, ǎƢƘȴ μƚƗȰ ƦȮ ƗƘƯƦƘƣƔ ƦʀƤ ƘȎƗƔƜμơƟƒƔƤ ƔȎƦʭ ƗƐƗƫƝƘƟ. ǿ ƗȰ ƆƮƞƫƟ ƥƧƟƘȴƤ ƦȲƟ ƞƯƢƚƟ ƾƢƘƨƑƟƔƦơ ȃƦƜ ƦƐƞơƤ ǎƥƦȴƟ ȃƣƔμƔ Ʀơʝ ƕƒơƧ. ƨƔƥȴ ƗȰ ƔȎƦơʝ Ʀȶ ƦƚƟƜƝƔʝƦƔ ƢơƞƘμƘʎƟ ƔǯƣơƧμƐƟơƧ ƢƣȶƤ ƄƐƣƥƔƤ ƩƣƚƥƛʀƟƔƜ ƢƔƣȮ Ʀơʝ ƛƘơʝ 15 žƣơʎƥơƤ NjƞƧƟ ƗƜƔƕȮƤ μƘƖƏƞƚƟ ƾƣƩȲƟ ƝƔƦƔƞƯƥƘƜ. ǿ ƗȰ ƟơμƒƥƔƤ ƢƘƣȴ ƦʀƤ ƄƘƣƥʬƟ ƾƣƩʀƤ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƞƐƖƘƜƟ ǎƢơƞƐμƚƥƘƟ ƝƔȴ ǟƦƦƚƛƘȴƤ ǎƟ ƢƧƣȴ ƕƐƕƞƚƦƔƜ ȏƢȶ žƯƣơƧ, ƝƔƜƮμƘƟơƤ ƗȰ ƆƮƞƫƟƔ ǎƢƘƝƔƞƘʎƦơ. džƢƮƞƞƫƟ ƗȰ ȂμƕƣơƟ ǎƢƜƕƔƞȺƟ ǒƥƕƘƥƘ Ʀȶ Ƣʝƣ. žƯƣơƧ ƗȰ ǎƣƫƦƑƥƔƟƦơƤ ƗƜƚƖƑƥƔƦơ ƔȎƦʭ Ʀȶ ƾƢƮƨƛƘƖμƔ Ʀơʝ ƨƜƞơƥƮƨơƧŭ ȃƛƘƟ 20 ƛƔƧμƏƥƔƤ ƦƘ ƝƔȴ ǎƟƟơƑƥƔƤ Ʀȶ ƦʀƤ ƦƯƩƚƤ ǂƗƚƞơƟ μƘƦȮ ƦƜμʀƤ ƾƢƐƢƘμƪƘƟ žƣơʎƥơƟ. L Ƈ r(MR) 2 ƨƔƥȴƟ – 12 ƕȵơƧ: cf. Hdt. I 29 – 33 13 ƨƔƥȴ – 15 ƝƔƦƔƞȹƥƘƜ: cf. Hdt. I 53 15 orac. 53 Parke - Wormell 17 ǟƦƦƚƛƘȴƤ – fin.: cf. Hdt. I 86 – 7

njƛƞơƜ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ – sch. 1b

59

1 lm.] ƞƮƖơƤ μƘƟ ǒƥƦŪ ƾƣƩƔʎơƤ (his accentibus) L: ǎƥƦŪ ƾƣƩƔʎơƤ ƀ: deest in R; (ǒƥƦŪ ƾƣƩƔʎơƤ n.) R; accuratiss. vv. 1–3 ƞƮƖơƤ – ƝƔƝƮƤ 1–2 μƘƦƔƖƘƟƐƥƦƘƣơƤ ƖȮƣ] μƘƦ. ƖȮƣ Ʀơʝ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ T 2 ƨƔƥȴƟ] ƨƔƥȴ ƗȰ T ƔǮƦƑƥƔƥƛƔƜ om. r ƆƮƞƫƟƔ] ƆƮƞơƟơƤ (sic) M ƟƮμơƧ ƖƣƔƨƑƟ L: ƟƮμƫƟ ƖƣƔƨƑƟ T: ƟƮμơƧƤ ƖƣƏƨƘƜƟ r ƦȶƟ LrrƇa: ƦʬƟ Ƈ 3 ƗƘƗƜƮƦƔ] ƗƜƗƜƮƦƔ, sic, r 3–5 ȃƣƝ. ƔǮƦʀƥƔƜ ƔȎƦơȸƤ ǎƢƜμƘƟƘʎƟ [ƗȰ]...ŭ ƢƔƣƘƧƞƔƕơƯμƘƟơƟ ƗȰ... ƾƟƔƩƫƣʀƥƔƜ sic textum refinxit Kruytbosch 42 praeeunte Brunck2 (ȃƣƝ. ƔǮƦ. ƔȎƦơƯƤŭ ǎƢƜμƘʎƟƔƜ ƗȰ..., ƝƔȴ ƢƔƣƘƧƞƔƕơƯμƘƟơƟ..., ƾƟƔƩƫƣʀƥƔƜ, cf. T): ȃƣƝ. ƔǮƦ. ƔȎƦơƯƤ. ǎƢȱμƘƟƘ ƗȰ ..., ƢƔƣƘƧƞƔƕơƯμƘƟơƤ ƗȰ..., ƾƟƔƩƫƣʀƥƔƜ L: ȃƣƝ. ƔǮƦ. ƔȎƦơƯƤ. ǎƢƐμƘƜƟƘ ƗȰ ... ƝƔȴ ƢƔƣƘƧƞƔƕơƯμƘƟơƤ..., ƾƟƔƩƫƣʀƥƔƜ T: ȃƣƝ. ƔǮƦ. ƔȎƦơʎƤ, ǎƢƐμƘƟƘ (ȏƢƐμƘƟƘ R) ƗȰ ... ƢƔƣƘƧƞƔƕơƯμƘƟơƤ ƗȰ ... ƾƟƘƩưƣƚƥƘƟ r 3 post ƗȰ (alt.) add. ƥȸƟ ƔȎƦơʎƤ T 4 μƐƟơƟƦƔ] μ. ƔȎƦȶƟ T 5 ƟơμƒμƫƟ] ƟƮμƫƟ Ra.c.: ƟơμƒμƫƟ Rp.c. 6 ƔȎƦȶƟ ǿ žƣơʎƥơƤ] ž. ƔȎƦȶƟ T ƗƘƒƝƟƧƥƜ] Ɨ. ƔȎƦʭ r 7 ǿƞȷƩƣƧƥơƟ] ƢȯƟƩƣƧƥơƟ, assimilatione neglecta T 8 ƝƔƧƩưμƘƟơƤ ƗȰ] ƝƔȴ Ɲ. T ƦƒƤ ƢƏƟƦƫƟ ƾƟƛƣưƢƫƟ ƘȎƗƔƜμơƟƐƥƦƘƣơƤ (-ƥƦƘƣơƟ M) Lrr: ƦƒƤ ƔȎƦơʝ ƢƏƟ. ƾƟƛ. ƘȎƗƔƜμơƟƐƥƦƘƣơƤ T: ƦƒƤ ƢƏƟ. ƾƟƛ. ƘȎƗƔƜμơƟƐƥƦƘƣơƤ Kruytbosch 43: ƦƒƤ ƢƏƟ. ƾƟƛ. ƘȎƗƔƜμơƟƐƥƦƔƦơƤ Neue 521 et Kruytbosch l.c., sed vide ad Ori fr. A 63 9 žƞƐơƕƜƟ] žƞƮơƕƜƟ sic M 9–10 ƦȮ ƗƘƯƦƘƣƔ] ƦȮ ƗƘƧƦƘƣƘʎƔ Kruytbosch l.c. 10 post ƗƘƯƦƘƣƔ add. ƔȎƦơʝ T ƨƐƣơƟƦƔ om. M ƢƣơƕƔƞơμƐƟơƧ Papageorgiou (cf. ad sch. 917.1 ǎƟƔƞơμƐƟƚ): ƢƣơƕƔƞƞơμƐƟơƧ codd. 11 ǎƢƘȴ μƚƗȰ] ȃƦƜ μȲ T: ǎƢƘȴ μȲ r; expectes ǎƢƘȴ ơȎƗƐ, sed vide ad sch. El. 31.3 μƑ ƗƐƗƫƝƘƟ] expectes ǒƗƫƝƘƟ, at cf. arg. 26 et ad arg. I.2–4 Soph. El. μƜƝƣȶƟ ƖȮƣ ƔȎƦȶƟ ȂƟƦƔ (scil. ȆƣƐƥƦƚƟ) ƝƞƐƪƔƥƔ ǟ ǦƞƐƝƦƣƔ, ǟƟƒƝƔ ǿ ƢƔƦȲƣ ǎƥƨƏƙƘƦơ, ƗƐƗƫƝƘ Ʀʭ ƦƣơƨƘʎ...; vide etiam SD II 287 12 ƾƢƘƨƑƟƔƦơ] ǎƢƘƨƑƟƔƦơ sic M ȃƣƔμƔ Ʀơʝ ƕƒơƧ (ƕơƒơƧ ƀ) LT r (Ʀơʝ quod Papageorgiou neglexit exstat in L), "ȃƣƔμƔ ‘prospectus’ h.l. valet: ‘finis prospectus est vitae’ ita ut modo cum vita desierit quid de praeterita felicitate censendum sit diiudicare possis" de Marco 222: ȃƣƔ [ǎƥƦȴƟ] μƔƝƣơʝ ƕƒơƧ Papageorgiou coll. sch. Eur. Andr. 100, haud male (contuli etiam Diogenian. VIII 51; Mantiss. Prov. II 96) 13 ƔȎƦơʝ Neue 521: ƔȎƦȶƟ codd.: ƔȎƦʭ Nauck 430 ƔȎƦơʝ ... ƢơƞƘμƘʎƟ ƔǯƣơƧμƐƟơƧ sic textum refinxit Neue l.c.: ƔȎƦȶƟ ... ƢơƞƘμƘʎƟ ƔǯƣơƧμƐƟơƧ L (ƢơƞƘμƘʎƟ legitur in L quod in ƢƮƞƘμơƟ corruperunt edd. plerique): ƔȎƦȶƟ ... ƢơƞƘμƘʎƟ ƔǯƣơƯμƘƟơƟ Trr: ƔȎƦơʝ ... ƢƮƞƘμơƟ (quasi ex L) ƔǮƣoμƐƟơƧ Kruytbosch 43 praeeunte Dindorf 68 (qui proposuerat ƔȎƦȶƟ ... ƢƮƞƘμơƟ ƔǮƣƮμƘƟơƟ): ƔȎƦʭ ... ƢƮƞƘμơƟ ƾƣơƧμƐƟʪ Nauck 430; vide 12 ƢơƞƘμƘʎƟ] ƔǮƣƘʎƟ Ƣ. R 14 post ƩƣƚƥƛʀƟƔƜ add. ƔȎƦʭ T 15 ƾƣƩȲƟ ƝƔƦƔƞƯƥƘƜ] ƝƔƦƔƞƯƥƘƦƔƜ ƾƣƩƑƟ r 16 ƄƘƣƥʬƟ] ƦʬƟ Ƅ. R 17 ȏƢȶ žƯƣơƧ om. r 17–8 ƆƮƞƫƟƔ ǎƢƘƝƔƞƘʎƦơ inv. ordine r 18 ǎƢƜƕƔƞȺƟ] ǎƢȴ ŸƚƬƔƟƘƒƣƔƤ ƕƔƞȺƟ r 19 ȃƛƘƟ] ȃƥƛƘƟ, sic, ƀ 20 post ƛƔƧμƏƥƔƤ add. žʝƣơƤ T ƦƘ ƝƔȴ ǎƟƟơƑƥƔƤ om. T

1b (ƞƮƖơƤ ... ƾƣƩƔʎơƤ): ƢƔƣơƜμƒƔ ǎƝ Ƣơƞƞơʝ ƘǮƣƚμƐƟƚ. L Ts.l. r(M) 1 lm. addidi haec ad v. 1 rettulit T (rettulit iam Nauck 430): post sch. 13b.2 ƾƢȶ ƝƣƑƟƚƤ demigraverunt in LM ǎƝ Ƣơƞƞơʝ] ǎƝ ƢƔƞƔƜơʝ Nauck l.c.

60

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

4 ǎƖȺ ƗȰ ƦȶƟ ǎμƮƟ: ǎƖư, ƨƚƥƒ, ƦȶƟ ǎμȶƟ ƔǮʬƟƔ ƝƔȴ Ƣƣȶ ƛƔƟƏƦơƧ ƗƜƐƖƟƫƝƔ ƕƔƣȸƟ ȂƟƦƔ ƝƔȴ ƾƢƘƩƛʀ ƝƔȴ ƗƧƥƦƧƩʀ. L Ts.l. r(R) 1 lm. deest in ƇR; (ǎƖȺ μȰƟ ƦȶƟ ǎμȶƟ n.) R; accuratiss. vv. 4–5 ǎƖȺ ƗȰ – ƕƔƣƯƟ ǎƖȻ (alt.) – ƝƔȴ (pr.) om. T ǎƖȺ (alt.)] ǎƖȺ ƗȰ R 1–2 Ƣƣȶ ƛƔƟƏƦơƧ ƗƜȱƖƟƫƝƔ ƕƔƣȸƟ 2 ƗƜȱƖƟƫƝƔ LR: ǒƖƟƫƝƔ Ƈ ȂƟƦƔ] ǢƖơƧƟ ƕ. ȂƟ. Ƣƣ. ƛ. ǒƖƟƫƝƔ Ƈ ƾƢƘƩƛʀ LR: ǎƢƔƩƛʀ Ƈ, coni. iam Nauck 430 prob. Bernardakis 58

7a (ǎƟ ƄƞƘƧƣʬƟƜ): ƢƮƞƜƤ ŵǮƦƫƞƒƔƤ. Ls.l. 1 cf. sch. D. Hom. Il. 2.639 ƄƞƘƧƣʬƟŪ: Ʀȶ ƢƞʀƣƘƤ «ƄƞƘƧƣʬƟƔ». ǒƥƦƜ ƗȰ ƢƮƞƜƤ ŵǮƦƫƞƒƔƤ; 13.217; Strab. X 2, 3 ŵǮƦƫƞʬƟ ƗŪ ƘǮƥȴ žƔƞƧƗȻƟ ƦƘ ƝƔȴ ƄƞƘƧƣȻƟ…; Hesych. Ƣ 2532 ƄƞƘƧƣưƟŭ ƢƮƞƜƤ ƦʀƤ ŵǮƦƫƞƒƔƤ; Steph. Byz. 527, 13 ƄƞƘƧƣȻƟ, ƢȷƞƜƤ ŵǮƦƫƞȵƔƤ… 1 lm. add. Brunck2

ƢƮƞƜƤ Elmsley: ƢƮƞ L (cf. ad sch. 39.1): ƢƮƞƘƜ Lascaris

7b ƟƧμƨƒƫƟ ȂƝƟơƟ : ƟƧμƨƒƫƟ ƾƟƦȴ ƦʬƟ ƟƧμƨƘƧμƏƦƫƟ ƝƔȴ μƟƚƥƦƘƧμƏƦƫƟ, ȂƝƟơƟ ƗȰ ƦȶƟ ƨƮƕơƟŭ ȋμƚƣơƤ

ǾƝƟƘƒƫ ƗŪ dzƢƢƫƟ ǎƢƜƕƔƜƟƐμƘƟ. ƘǮ ƗȰ ƖƣƏƨƘƦƔƜ ȂƦƞơƟ, ƦȲƟ ƦƔƞƔƜƢƫƣƒƔƟŭ žƔƞƞƒμƔƩơƤ 5 ƝƘƟƘȶƟ ƢƮƟơƟ ǾƦƞƑƥƔƟƦƘƤ. L Ts.l. r(MR) 1 ƟƧμƨƘƧμƏƦƫƟ: cf. Choer. Orth. AO II 241, 21 ƁƧμƨƘʎƔ: ƘƜ, ǟ ƟȹμƨƘƧƥƜƤ; etiam sch. Ant. 568 ƟƧμƨƘʎƔ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƦȲƟ ƟȹμƨƚƟ 2 ȂƝƟơƟ – 3 ǎƢƜƕƔƜƟƐμƘƟ: cf. sch. 181; sch. El. 320; sch. OT 749 ǾƝƟʬ] ƗƐƗơƜƝƔ. ƝƔȴ ȋμƚƣơƤ «ǾƝƟƘƒƫ ƗŪ dzƢƢƫƟ ǎƢƜƕƔƜƟƐμƘƟ»; sch. Ai. 81c ǾƝƟƘʎƤ: ƢơƜƚƦƜƝȶƟ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƨơƕʁŭ ƢƧƝƟʬƤ ƖȮƣ ƦƒƛƚƥƜ Ʀȶ ǾƝƟƘʎƟ ǎƢȴ Ʀơʝ ƨơƕƘʎƥƛƔƜ; sch. OT 986 ǾƝƟƘʎƟ] ƨơƕƘʎƥƛƔƜ; Hesych. ơ 481 ȂƝƟơƤŭ … ƝƔȴ ƨƮƕơƤ 2 ȋμƚƣơƤ: Il. 5.255 4 ƦƔƞƔƜƢƫƣƒƔƟ: cf. sch. Aesch. Th. 18m ȂƦƞơƟŭ ƝƔƝơƢȯƛƘƜƔƟ…; Philox. fr. 264 (= Or. 119, 13) ȂƦƞơƤŭ ƢƔƣȮ Ʀȶ Ʀƞʬ, Ʀȶ ƝƔƝơƢƔƛʬ; Hesch. ơ 1499 ȂƦƞơƤ· μȷƩƛơƤ; Phot. ơ 355; Theogn. AO II 44,9–10 ȂƦƞơƤ ǿ μƮƩƛơƤ, ǿ ƢƮƟơƤ; Su. ơ 746 ȊƦƞơƤ: ǟ ƝƔƝơƢƏƛƘƜƔ; Eust. Il. I 332, 23–4 ; ibid. IV 197, 11–3 ; id. Od. I 271, 4–5 žƔƞƞƒμƔƩơƤ: fr. 303 Pf. ƝƘƟƘȶƟ ƢƮƟơƟ ǾƦƞƑƥơƟƦƘƤ 1 lm.] ƟƧμƨƒƫƟ ƀ: deest in Ƈ ƟƧμƨƒƫƟ (alt.)] ƟƧμƨƒƫƟ ȂƝƟơƟ ƀ: om. TR ƾƟƦȴ ƦʬƟ] 2 ȂƝƟơƟ ƗȰ ƦȶƟ om. Ƈ ȋμƚƣơƤ] ƝƔȴ ȋμ. Trr ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ r: deest in Ƈ ƝƔȴ om. Ƈ 3 dzƢƢƫƟ] dzƢƢơƟ R ǎƢƜƕƔƜƟƐμƘƟ] ǎƢƜƕƑμƘƟƔƜ r 4 ƘǮ ƗȰ – fin. om. Ƈ (ȂƝƟơƟ apud

sch. 4 – sch. 13a

61

poetam praebet T) Ɩƣ. L ȂƦƞơƟ] ȃƢƞơƟ ƀ inter ƦƔƞƔƜƢƫƣƒƔƟ et žƔƞƞƒμƔƩơƤ verba Ǡ ȋμƚƣơƤ Ʀȶ μƘμơƣƚμƐƟơƟ ƝƔȴ ƢƘƢƣƫμƐƟơƟ leguntur in L; vide ad sch. 7c

7c (ȂƦƞơƟ): [Ǡ] ȋμƚƣơƤ Ʀȶ μƘμơƣƚμƐƟơƟ ƝƔȴ ƢƘƢƣƫμƐƟơƟ. L 1 haec post sch. 7b.4 ƦƔƞƔƜƢƫƣƒƔƟ inserta in L separatim collocavi; vide Xenis lm. addidi Ǡ delevi de Marco 222 ‘vox ȂƦƞơƤ … nec ab Homero usurpatur nec aliter ac μƮƩƛơƤ vel ƝƔƝơƢƏƛƘƜƔ vel ƢƮƟơƤ ƝƔȴ μƮƩƛơƤ a lexicographis explanatur’, sed scholiasta ȂƦƞơƟ cum ơǴƦơƟ confundere videtur

7d (ȂƝƟơƟ): ƖƣƏƨƘƦƔƜ ȂƦƞơƟŭ ǟƗƘʎƔ ƗȰ ǟ ƨƣƏƥƜƤ ƝƔȴ ǟ ǯƥƦơƣƒƔ. L 1 ƨƣƏƥƜƤ, i.e. ƟƧμƨƘƒƫƟ ȂƝƟơƟ ǂƞƖƜƥƦơƟ ǒƥƩơƟ ǯƥƦơƣƒƔ] ad vv. 9–17 spectat 1 lm. addidi; (ȂƝƟơƟ s.) L Ɩƣ. L

12 (ƗƣƏƝƫƟ ǏƞƜƝƦƮƤ): ƗƜȮ Ʀȶ ƥƝơƞƜȶƟ ƦʬƟ ʜƘƧμƏƦƫƟ. L 1 cf. Strab. X 2, 19 … ƗƣȯƝơƟƦƜ ƗȰ ƗƜȮ Ʀȶ μʀƝơƤ ƝƔȴ ƦȲƟ ƥƝơƞƜȷƦƚƦƔ 1 lm. add. Lascaris (cave Papageorgiou credas librum lemma habere)

13a ƕơƯƝƣƔƟơƤ : ơǯ ƢơƦƔμơȴ ƦƔƧƣȷƝƣƔƟơƜ ƗƜƘƦƧƢơʝƟƦơ Ǡ ȃƦƜ μƧƝƚƛμʭ ƘǮƥƜ ƢƔƣƔƢƞƑƥƜơƜ ƢƘƣȴ ƦȮƤ ǎƝƕơƞƏƤŭ ȋμƚƣơƤ

ƦơȸƤ ǒƝƕƔƞƞƘ μƘμƧƝȺƤ ǞƯƦƘ ƦƔʝƣơƤ. Ǡ ȃƦƜ ƥƩƒƙơƧƥƜ ƦȲƟ ƖʀƟ ȟƤ ƕƮƘƤŭ Ǡ ƗƜȮ Ʀȶ ƦȮƤ ƝƔƦƔƟơμȮƤ ƢƔƣȮ ƢơƦƔμơȸƤ 5 ƘǴƟƔƜ. L T r(MR) 1 ơǯ ƢơƦƔμơȴ – 4 ƕƮƘƤ: cf. Strab. X 2, 19 ơǯ ƗŪ ƘǮƝȯƙơƟƦƘƤ ǎƠ ƔȎƦʬƟ ƦƾƞƚƛȰƤ ƦƔȹƣʪ μȰƟ ǎơƜƝȷƦƔ ƞȱƖƘƥƛƔƜ ƦȶƟ džƩƘƞʬȷƟ ƨƔƥƜ, ƝƔƛȯƢƘƣ ƝƔȴ ƦơȸƤ ǂƞƞơƧƤ ƢơƦƔμơȹƤ, ƾƢȷ ƦƘ ƦʬƟ ǢƩƫƟ ƝƔȴ ƦʬƟ ƝƔƦȮ ƦȮ ʜƘʎƛƣƔ ƝƔμƢʬƟ, ǁƤ ƝƔƞơʝƥƜ ƝȱƣƔƦƔ; sch. Eur. Or. 1378 …ǎƢƜƘƜƝʬƤ ƗȰ ƦơȸƤ ƢơƦƔμơȸƤ ƦƔƧƣơƝƣȯƟơƧƤ ǎƙʪƖƣȯƨơƧƟ ƦƘ ƝƔȴ ǒƞƘƖơƟ DzƥƫƤ ȃƦƜ ƢƔƣƔƢƞƚƥȵƔ Ʀʭ μƧƝȳμƔƦƜ ƦʬƟ ƦƔȹƣƫƟ ǟ ƾƢȳƩƚƥƜƤ Ʀơʝ ȓƗƔƦơƤ ǎƟ ƦơʎƤ ƥƨơƗƣʬƤ ʜȱơƧƥƜ ƢơƦƔμơʎƤ. Ǡ ƗƜȮ Ʀȶ ƕȵƔƜơƟ ƦʬƟ ȏƗȯƦƫƟ, ǃƢƘƣ ƦȲƟ ƖʀƟ ƗƜȮ ƦȮ ƢƔƣƘμƢȵƢƦơƟƦƔ

62

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

ƦʬƟ ȏƗȯƦƫƟ ʜȳƖƟƧƥƜƟ ȟƤ ƦơʎƤ ƝȱƣƔƥƜƟ ơǯ ƦƔʝƣơƜ 1 ơǯ ƢơƦƔμơȴ – ƗƜƘƦƧƢơʝƟƦơ: cf. sch. Aesch. Pr. 721a. ƝƣơƦȯƨƫƟ] ƇơȸƤ ƢơƦƔμơȸƤ ơǯ ƢƔƞƔƜơȴ ƕơƧƝƣȯƟơƧƤ ǯƥƦơƣơʝƥƜƟ· ȃƛƘƟ ŵǮƥƩȹƞơƤ ǒƨƚƥƘƟ ǎƟƦƔʝƛƔ Ʀȶ «ƝƣơƦȯƨƫƟ». 2 ȋμƚƣơƤ: Il. 21.237 ƦơȸƤ ǒƝƕƔƞƞƘ ƛȹƣƔƙƘ μƘμƧƝȺƤ ǞƯƦƘ ƦƔʝƣơƤ 1 lm.] ƕơƯƝƣƔƟơƤ ƀ qui hoc vocabulum repetit in initio scholii; (ƕơƯƝƣƔƟơƤ n.) R μƧƝƚƛμʭ] μƧƝƚƛμʬƟ ƀ: μƧƝƚƟƔƒʪ R 2–3 ȋμƚƣơƤ – ƦƔʝƣơƤ om. r, recte secundum de Marco 222 2 ȋμƚƣơƤ] ȟƤ ƝƔȴ ȋμ. T 3 ƦơȸƤ] ƦơȸƤ ƗŪ T ǒƝƕƔƞƞƘ a T: ǒƝƕƔƞƘƟ L post ǒƝƕƔƞƞƘ add. ƛƯƣƔƙƘ a T 4 ƥƩƒƙơƧƥƜ] ƥƩƒƙơƧƥƔ ƀ ƕƮƘƤ] ơǯ ƕ. T r Ǡ – fin.] haec verba alius scholiastae sunt secundum de Marco 222, fortasse recte ƝƔƦƔƟơμȮƤ ƢƔƣȮ ƢơƦƔμơƯƤ] ƟơμȮƤ ƢƘƣȴ ƦơȸƤ Ƣ. T: ƝƔƦƔƟơμȮƤ (ƝƔƦȮ ƟơμȮƤ R) ƢƘƣȴ ƢơƦƔμʬƟ r

13b ǎƝ ƗȰ ƗƔƥƝƒơƧ ƖƘƟƘƜƏƗơƤ : ǿ ƟơʝƤŭ ǎƝ ƗȰ ƦʀƤ ƗƔƥƯƦƣƜƩơƤ ƖƘƟƘƜƏƗơƤ ƔȎƦơʝ ƝƔƦƐƣƣƘƜ ƢƞʀƛơƤ ȏƗƏƦƫƟ ȟƤ ƾƢȶ ƝƣƑƟƚƤ. L T r(MR) 1 lm.] ƗƔƥƝƒơƧ ƖƘƟƘƜƏƗơƤ ƀ qui haec vocabula praepositis ǎƝ ƗȰ duplicat in initio scholii: deest in T, quippe qui hoc sch. cum pr. iungat (ǿ ƗȰ ƟơʝƤ); (ƗƔƥƝƒơƧ ƖƘƟƘƜƏƗơƤ n.) R; accuratiss. vv. 13–14 ǎƝ ƗȰ – ƢơƦơʝ; 2 ȟƤ om. r post ƝƣƑƟƚƤ verba ad sch. 1b pertinentia leguntur in Lrr, vide ad sch. 1b.1

14 (ƝƣƚƟƔƒơƧ): ƞƘƒƢƘƜ Ʀȶ ȟƤ, ȟƤ ƾƢȶ ƝƣƑƟƚƤ. Ls.l. 1 lm. scripsi

20 ƘǮƤ ƾƖʬƟƔ ƦʭƗƘ ƥƧμƢƘƥȺƟ μƏƩƚƤ : ƦơʝƦơ ƖȮƣ ǤƟ ƢƔƣȮ ƃǮƟƐƫƤ ȟƣƜƥμƐƟơƟ, Ʀʭ ƟƜƝʬƟƦƜ džƩƘƞʭơƟ ƔȎƦȲƟ ƗưƥƘƜƟ. L Ts.l. r(R) 1 ad hoc lm. sch. rettuli: ad lm. ǿ ƝƞƘƜƟȶƤ ǤƞƛƘ źƚƟƮƤ (v. 19) rettulit L: ad lm. ƩƣƮƟʪ 1–2 ƦơʝƦơ ƖȮƣ ǤƟ ƢƔƣȮ ƗŪ ǎƟ ȏƥƦƐƣʪ μƐƟ (v. 18) R: lm. deest in T; (ƩƣƮƟʪ n.) R; ƃǮƟƐƫƤ ȟƣƜƥμƐƟơƟ] ǤƟ ƖȮƣ ȟƣƜƥμƐƟơƟ T: ƃǮƟƐʪ (sic) ȟƣƜƥμƐƟʪ R 2 Ʀʭ ƟƜƝʬƟƦƜ LR, (cf. sch. Eur. Hipp. 546 ƞȱƖƘƜ ƗȰ ƦȲƟ ǶȷƞƚƟ ƦȲƟ ƢƔʎƗƔ Ʀơʝ ŹȎƣȹƦơƧ, ǡƟ ǒƞƘƖƘ ƗƜƗȷƟƔƜ Ʀʭ ƟƜƝʬƟƦƜ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƝƔƦȮ ƦȲƟ ƦơƠƜƝȳƟ; vide LSJ s.v. II): Ʀʭ ƟƜƝƑƥƔƟƦƜ T post ƗưƥƘƜƟ add. ƢƣȶƤ ƖƏμơƟ R

sch. 13a – sch. 23

63

21a ǎƝƞƯƘƦƔƒ μƘ : ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƾƢƔƞƞƏƦƦƘƜ μƘ ƝƔȴ ǎƞƘƧƛƘƣơʎ Ʀơʝ ƨƮƕơƧ, Ʀơʝ džƩƘƞʫơƧ ƢƘƣƜƖƘƟƮμƘƟơƤ. L Ts.l. r(MR) 1 ƾƢƔƞƞƏƦƦƘƜ: cf. sch. Eur. Ph. 695 (ad lm. ǎƝƞƯƘƜ): ƾƢƔƞƞƏƥƥƘƜ ǎƞƘƧƛƘƣơʎ: cf. Lex. Vind. Ƙ 90 ǎƝƞƯƘƜŭ …. ƞƐƖƘƦƔƜ ƝƔȴ ǎƝƞƯƘƜ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǎƞƘƧƛƘƣơʎ… 1 lm. deest in ƇR; (ǎƝƞƯƘƦƔƒ μƘ n.) R; ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ] Ǥ (voluit Ǡ) ƀ: om. ƇR ƾƢƔƞƞƏƦƦƘƜ μƘ ƝƔȴ ǎƞƘƧƛƘƣơʎ] ǎƞ. ƾƢ. μƘ T: ƾƢ. μƘ ƝƔȴ ǎƞƘƧƛƘƣƘʎ R 2 Ʀơʝ džƩƘƞʫơƧ ƢƘƣƜƖƘƟƮμƘƟơƤ] ƢƘƣƜƖƘƟƮμƘƟơƤ Ʀ. džƩ. T: Ʀ. džƩ. ƢƔƣƔƖƘƟƮμƘƟơƤ r

21b ƝƔȴ ƦƣƮƢơƟ μȰƟ ǀƟ ƢƮƟƫƟ : ƦȶƟ ƦƣƮƢơƟ ƦʀƤ ƢƣȶƤ ƾƞƞƑƞơƧƤ ƔȎƦʬƟ μƏƩƚƤ ơȎƝ ǀƟ ƗƜƘƒƢơƜμƜ [ǎƗƘƗơƒƝƘƜ Ɩȯƣ], ǎƝƘʎƟơƤ ƗŪ ƘDzƢơƜ ȁƤ ǂƨơƕơƤ ƔȎƦʬƟ ƦȲƟ μƏƩƚƟ ƛƘƫƣʬƟ ǎƝƏƛƚƦơŭŭ ȋμƚƣơƤ 5

ǒƟƛƔ ƝƘƟ ơȎƝƐƦƜ ǒƣƖơƟ ƾƟȲƣ ǾƟƮƥƔƜƦơ μƘƦƘƞƛȺƟ ȃƤ ƦƜƤ ǒƦŪ ǂƕƞƚƦơƤ. L T r(MR); cf. etiam gll. in Ts.l. 2 μƏƩƚƤ: ƢƮƟơƤ per μƏƩƚ explicatur in sch. Hom. Il. 13.239 : ƦȲƟ μȯƩƚƟ; ibid. 17.41b; ibid. 21.137; 3 ȋμƚƣơƤ: Il. 4.539–41 ǚƟƛȯ ƝƘƟ ơȎƝȱƦƜ ǒƣƖơƟ ƾƟȲƣ ǾƟȷƥƔƜƦơ μƘƦƘƞƛȻƟ, | ȃƤ ƦƜƤ ǒƦŪ ǂƕƞƚƦơƤ ƝƔȴ ƾƟơȹƦƔƦơƤ ǾƠȱƬ ƩƔƞƝʭ | ƗƜƟƘȹơƜ ƝƔƦȮ μȱƥƥơƟ 1 lm.] ƝƔȴ ƦƣƮƢơƟ ƀ: deest in TR; (ƦƣƮƢƫƟ sic n.) R; accuratiss. vv. 21–3 ƝƔȴ ƦƣƮƢơƟ – ǀƟ ƞƐƖơƜ 1–2 ƦȶƟ ƦƣƮƢơƟ – ƖƏƣ] om. in margine T, sed praebuit ǢƖơƧƟ ƦʀƤ ƢƣȶƤ ƾƞƞƑƞơƧƤ ƔȎƦʬƟ μƏƩƚƤ ut gl. ad ƢƮƟƫƟ et ǎƗƘƗơƒƝƘƜƟ ƖƏƣ ut gl. ad ơȎ ƖȮƣ ơǴƗŪ 1 ƦʀƤ om. r 2 ƗƜƘƒƢơƜμƜ] ƗȰ ƘDzƢơƜμƜ R ǎƗƘƗơƒƝƘƜ ƖƏƣ delevi ƖƏƣ] ƗȰ R ǎƝƘʎƟơƤ ƗŪ ƘDzƢơƜ] ǎƝ. ƨƚƥȴƟ ƘDzƢ. T ƘDzƢơƜ om. R ǂƨơƕơƤ] ƾƨƮƕƫƤ T: ǂƨƫƟơƤ R ǎƝƏƛƚƦơ om. r 4 ǒƟƛƔ ƝƘƟ] ǒƟƛƔƝơƤ r ơȎƝƐƦƜ] ơȎƝ ǒƥƦŪ Ƈ ǾƟƮƥƔƜƦơ – fin. om. r 5 ȃƤ ƦƜƤ ǒƦŪ ǂƕƞƚƦơƤ] ȃƤ ƦƒƤ ƖŪ ǒƥƦƜƟ ǂƝƞƚƦơƤ Ƈ

23 (ƛƔƝʬƟ): ƛɱƝơƤ ǟ ƝƔƛƐƗƣƔ. Ls.l. 1 cf. sch. Hom. Od. 2.14b1 ƛưƝʪ: ƦơʝƦơƟ ơǯ džƦƦƜƝơȴ ƛɱƝơƟ ƞƐƖơƧƥƜƟ. ǒƥƦƜ ƗȰ ƝƔƛƐƗƣƔ; Philox. fr. *97 (= Et.Gen. AB s.v. ƛɱƝơƤ unde EM 441, 11) ƛɱƝơƤŭ ǿ ƝƔȴ ƛʬƝơƤ ƝƔƞơȹμƘƟơƤ, ǟ ƝƔƛȱƗƣƔ…; Hesych. ƛ 14 ƛɱƝơƤŭ ƝƔƛƐƗƣƔ, ƛƣƮƟơƤ; Ɔ ƛ ƛɱƝơƜ: ƛƣȷƟơƜ, ƝƔƛȱƗƣƔƜ = Phot. ƛ 3 = Su. ƛ 3 1 lm. addidi; participium ƛƔƝʬƟ commentatorem cognovisse coni. Wolff 199 prob. de Marco 223, substantivum ƛƏƝƫƟ coni. Dindorf2 238 prob. Blaydes 15; apud poetam

64

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

ƛƔƝʬƟ La.c.: ƛưƝʬƟ (duobus accentibus) Lp.c.

‘annotationem olim hanc fuisse arbitror: ƛƔƝʬƟ: ƝƔƛƑμƘƟơƤŭ ƝƔȴ (sive ǿ ƖȮƣ) ƛɱƝơƤ, ǟ ƝƔƛƐƗƣƔ. quae ab epitomatore videtur mutilata esse’ Wolff l.c.

24 ǣμƚƟ : ƗƔƥƐƫƤ dzƟƔ ƥƧƟƏƗɾ Ʀʭ

ƾƞƞŪ ȃƥƦƜƤ ǤƟ ƛƔƝʬƟ ƾƦƔƣƕȲƤ ƦʀƤ ƛƐƔƤŭ ơǯ ƗȰ ƪƜƞʬƤ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ȏƢʀƣƩơƟ. L r(R) 2–3 vv. 22–3 1 lm. add. Brunck2: lm. ǎƖȺ ƖȮƣ ƑμƚƟ (ƑμƚƟ cum duobus spiritibus, leni et aspero) L: ǢμƚƟ R; (ǢμƚƟ n.) R Ʀʭ Stephanus 331: Ʀȶ L: om. R 3 ƾƦƔƣƕȲƤ om. R

25 μƑ μơƜ Ʀȶ ƝƏƞƞơƤ : μȲ ƗƜȮ Ʀȶ ƝƏƞƞơƤ ƾƞƖƚƗƮƟƜ ƢƘƣƜƢƐƥƫ Ʀʭ džƩƘƞʫʪ ƖƔμƚƛƘʎƥƔ. L Ts.l. r(R) 1 lm. deest in ƇR; (Ʀȶ ƝƏƞƞơƤ n.) R; accuratiss. v. 25 μƑ μơƜ – ƢơƦƐ

26 ƦƐƞơƤ ƗŪ ǒƛƚƝƘ źƘȸƤ ƾƖưƟƜơƤ : ǿ ƢƣƯƦƔƟƜƤ Ʀơʝ ƾƖʬƟơƤ. Ʀȶ ƗȰ ȃƞơƟ ơȓƦƫƤ ǒƩƘƜŭ ǿ ƾƖưƟƜơƤ źƘȸƤ ƘȎƦƧƩʬƤ Ʀʭ ƾƖʬƟƜ ƦƐƞơƤ ǎƢƐƛƚƝƘƟ, ǎμơȴ ƗȰ ơȎƝ ƘȎƦƧƩʬƤŭ ƘȎƦƧƩʬƤ μȰƟ ȃƦƜ ƾƢƑƞƞƔƠƐ μƘ Ʀơʝ džƩƘƞʫơƧ, ơȎƝ ƘȎƦƧƩʬƤ ƗȰ ȃƦƜ ƝƔȴ ƟʝƟ ơȎƩ ǥƦƦơƟ ƾƖƫƟƜʬ ƗƜȮ ƦȲƟ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ ƾƢơƧƥƒƔƟ. L T r(MR) 1 ǿ ƢƣƯƦƔƟƜƤ Ʀơʝ ƾƖʬƟơƤ: cf. sch. Pi. I. 1.85a ubi ƾƖưƟƜơƤ ǗƣμɱƤ per ǿ ƦʬƟ ƾƖưƟƫƟ ƢƣơƥƦƏƦƚƤ explanatur; Hesych. Ɣ 957 ƾƖȻƟƜơƜ ƛƘơȵ· ơǯ ƦʬƟ ƾƖȻƟƫƟ ƢƣơƘƥƦʬƦƘƤ 1 lm.] źƘȸƤ ƾƖưƟƜơƤ ƝƔƞʬƤ R: źƘȸƤ ƾƖưƟơƜƤ sic ƀ qui haec vocabula repetit addito ƝƔƞʬƤ in initio scholii: deest in Ƈ; (ƾƖưƟƜơƤ n.) R; accuratiss. 26–7 ƦƐƞơƤ – ƝƔƞʬƤ (lm.) ǒƛƚƝƘƟ L ǿ Ƣƣ. Ʀoʝ ƾƖ. transp. post źƘȸƤ (2) praemisso ǢƖơƧƟ Ƈ ƗȰ deest in Ƈ propterea quod Ʀȶ ȃƞơƟ in initio scholii positum est 1–2 Ʀȶ ƗȰ ȃƞơƟ ơȓƦƫƤ ǒƩƘƜ] Ʀȶ ƗȰ źƘȸƤ ơȓƦƫƤ ǒƩƘƜ ƀ: ǒƩƘƜ ƗȰ ơȓƦƫƤ R 2 ƘȎƦƧƩʬƤ Papageorgiou: ƘȎƦƧƩȰƤ codd. 3 ƘȎƦƧƩʬƤ (alt.) … ƘȎƦƧƩʬƤ (tert.)] ƘȎƦƧƩʬ ... ƘȎƦƧƩʬ r ȃƦƜ] ơȓƦƫ ƀ 4 ƾƢơƧƥƒƔƟ] ǂƖơƧƥƔƟ ƀ

65

sch. 23 – sch. 29a

27a (ƘǮ ƗȲ ƝƔƞʬƤ): ƗƜȮ Ʀȶ ƝƔȴ ƢƘƣȴ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ ƾƖƫƟƜɱƟ. L r(R) 1 hanc annotationem a sch. 27b separavi coll. sch. 26.3–4 ơȎƝ ƘȎƦƧƩʬƤ (alt.) – fin. et lemmate instruxi: scholio 28 continuavit Brunck1

27b ƞƐƩơƤ ƖȮƣ ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ ƝƣƜƦƮƟ : ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǒƝƝƣƜƦơƟ. L Ts.l. r(R) 1 ǒƝƝƣƜƦơƟ: cf. sch. Pi. P. 4.88a ubi ƝƣƜƦȶƟ ƖƐƟơƤ per ǒƝƝƣƜƦơƟ ƝƔȴ ƗƜƔƢƣƘƢȰƤ ƖƐƟơƤ explicatur; sch. D. Hom. Il. 7.434 ƝƣƜƦƮƤ: ǒƝƝƣƜƦơƤ, ǎƠƘƜƞƘƖμƐƟơƤ ƘǮƤ Ʀȶ ǒƣƖơƟ; Eust. Il. II 491, 2 1 lm.] deest in TR; (ƞƐƩơƤ n.) R; ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ om. TR

ǒƝƝƣƜƦơƟ] ƢƣơƝƘƝƣƜμƐƟơƟ T

28 (ƠƧƥƦɱƥŪ): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƥƧƟƘƞƛơʝƥƔŭ ƦƣƐƨƫ ƗȰ ƾƟƦȴ ǒƩƫ, ƔȒƠƫ. L; cf. gl. in Ts.l. 1 ƦƣƐƨƫ – fin.: cf. sch. 817b; sch. OT. 356 Ʀƣȱƨƫ] ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǒƩƫ unde Su. Ʀ 51 et 929; sch. Ant. 897 ƘȎƘƢȵƨơƣơƤ ǿ ƆơƨơƝƞʀƤ Ʀȶ Ʀƣȱƨƫ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǒƩƫ; Hesych. Ʀ 1308 ƦƣƐƨƘƜƟŭ ǒƩƘƜƟ (e.g. Soph. Ant. 1089)… 1 lm. add. Lascaris (nisi quod ƠƧƥƦɱƥƔ scriptione plena pro ƠƧƥƦɱƥŪ scripsit.): (ƠƧƟƥƦɱƥŪ (sic) s.) L ƾƟƦȴ (pr.) – fin.] ƥƧƟƘƞƛơʝƥƔ gl. ad ƠƧƥƦɱƥƔ, ǒƩƫ, ƔȒƠƫ gl. ad ƦƣƐƨƫ T nec plura T

29a ƢƣơƝƚƣƔƒƟơƧƥƔ : ƾƖƫƟƜʬƥƔ, μƘƣƜμƟʬƥƔ ƝƔƦȮ Ʀȶ ƝƐƔƣ, ȃ ǎƥƦƜƟ ǎƟ ƕƏƛƘƜ ƕơƧƞƘƧơμȱƟƚŭ ƝƔȴ ŹȎƣƜƢƒƗƚƤ Ʀƒ ƢơƦŪ, Ȥ ƦƐƝƟơƟ, ƦƏƗƘ ƝƚƣƔƒƟƘƜƤ; L T r(R) 1 cf. sch. Eur. Hipp. 223 ƝƚƣƔȵƟƘƜƤ: μƘƣƜμƟɲƤ ƨƣơƟƦȵƙƘƜƤ, ǎƟ Ʀʭ ƝȱƔƣƜ ǒƩƘƜƤ...; Hesych. Ɲ 2532 ƝƚƣƔȵƟƘƜŭ ... μƘƣƜμƟɲ, ƨƣơƟƦȵƙƘƜ... 2 ŹȎƣƜƢƒƗƚƤ: Hipp. 223 1 lm.] ƢƣơƝƚƣƔƒƟơƧƥƔ ƗȰ T quippe qui hoc sch. scholio 26 subiungat: deest in R; (ƢƣơƝƚƣƔƒƟơƧƥƔ n.) R ƾƖƫƟƜʬƥƔ] ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƾƖ. TR μƘƣƜμƟʬƥƔ] ƝƔȴ μ. R 2 ƕơƧƞƘƧơμƐƟƚ] –μƐƟƚƟ R 3 Ȥ ƦƐƝƟơƟ] Ǥ ƦƐƝƟƔ R ƝƚƣƔƒƟƘƜƤ] ƝƚƣƔƒƣƫƟ sic R

66

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

29b ƟȸƠ ƖȮƣ ƘǮƥƏƖƘƜ : ƾƟƦȴ ƟƧƝƦȶƤ ǒƣƩƘƦƔƜ ƝƔȴ ƟƧƝƦȶƤ ǎƠơƣμɱƦƔƜ, ȟƤ μȲ ƗƜƔƗơƩƑƟ μơƜ ƦʬƟ ƢƮƟƫƟ ƖƘƟƐƥƛƔƜ. L T r(R) 1 lm. deest in TR; accuratiss. vv. 29–30 ƟȸƠ ƖȮƣ – ƢƮƟơƟ ƾƟƦȴ] ƾƟ. Ʀơʝ R: om. T 1–2 ȟƤ – fin.] ȣƥƦƘ ƗƜƔƗơƩƑƟ μơƜ ƦʬƟ ƢƮƟƫƟ ƖƒƖƟƘƥƛƔƜ Lascaris: ȟƤ [μȲ] ƗƜƔƗơƩƑƟ μơƜ (vel ȟƤ ǎμơȴ ƗƜƔƗơƩƑƟ [μơƜ]) ƦʬƟ ƢƮƟƫƟ ƖƒƟƘƥƛƔƜ Nauck 430; versus 29–30 poetae scholiasta ita intellexisse videtur, post ƘǮƥƏƖƘƜ et ƾƢƫƛƘʎ mente supplens ƔȎƦƮƟ (ƦȶƟ ǧƣƔƝƞƐƔ scilicet et non ƢƮƟơƟ; cf. e.g. Campbell ad loc.), ut sensus sit: Hercules per breve temporis spatium domi est (ƟȸƠ ƘǮƥƏƖƘƜ); nullus igitur angor eo tempore Deianirae animum conturbat 2 ƗƜƔƗơƩƑƟ] non ad ƗƜƔƗƘƗƘƖμƐƟƚ refertur ƦʬƟ ƢƮƟƫƟ ƖƘƟƐƥƛƔƜ] ƖƘƟ. ƦʬƟ Ƣ. T

32 ƖɿƦƚƤ : ƖƘƫƣƖƮƤ, ǿ ƦȲƟ ƖʀƟ ǎƣƖƔƙƮμƘƟơƤŭ ǒƝƦơƢơƟ ƗȰ ǒƠƫ ƝƔȴ ƢƮƣƣƫ ơȔƥƔƟ. L Ts.l. r(MR) 1 ƖƘƫƣƖƮƤ – ǎƣƖƔƙƮμƘƟơƤ: cf. Hesych. Ɩ 501 ƖƚŴƦƚƤŭ ǿ ƦȲƟ ƖʀƟ ǎƣƖƔƙƮμƘƟơƤ, ƖƘƫƣƖƮƤ (Soph. Trach. 32) 1 lm.] ƖƑƦƚƤ ȃƢƫƤ ƀ: deest in TR; (ƖƑƦƚƤ n.) R ƖƘƫƣƖƮƤ] ǿ Ɩ. r: post ǎƣƖƔƙȷμƘƟơƤ transp. T ǒƝƦơƢơƟ ƗȰ om. T ante ǒƠƫ add. μƘƖȯƞƚƟ T

35 ƞƔƦƣƘƯơƟƦȯ Ʀʪ : ȏƢƚƣƘƦơʝƟƦƔ Ʀʭ ŹȎƣƧƥƛƘʎ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. deest in T ȏƢƚƣƘƦơʝƟƦƔ om. T

36 ȏƢƘƣƦƘƞƑƤ : ƾƟƦȴ ȏƢȰƣ Ʀȶ ƦƐƞơƤ ƖƐƖơƟƘƟ, ơǵơƟ Ʀơʝ ƦƐƞơƧƤ ƦʬƟ ǂƛƞƫƟ ƝƣƘƒƦƦƫƟ Ȣƨƛƚ ƝƔƦơƣƛưƥƔƤ ƔȎƦơȹƤŭ Ǡ ȏƢƐƣƦƘƣơƤ ƔȎƦʬƟ ǎƥƦƜƟ, ǎƖƝƣƔƦȲƤ ƝƔȴ ȏƢƘƣƏƟƫ. L r(MR); cf. gll. in Ts.l. 1 ƾƟƦȴ – ƖƐƖơƟƘƟ: cf. Hesych. Ƨ 467 ȏƢƘƣƦƘƞȳƤŭ ȏƢȰƣ Ʀȶ ƦȱƞơƤ ƾƨƜƝơμȱƟƚ (Aesch. Ag. 286) 1 lm. deest in R; accuratiss. ǂƛƞƫƟ ƦʬƟƗŪ ȏƢƘƣƦƘƞȲƤ ǒƨƧ; (ȏƢƘƣƦƘƞʀƤ, hoc accentu, n.) R ƾƟƦȴ] ƾƟ. Ʀơʝ r ƾƟƦȴ – fin.] ȏƢȱƣƦƘƣơƤ, ƝƔƦơƣƛȻƥƔƤ ƔȎƦơȸƤ gll. ad ȏƢƘƣƦƘƞƑƤ T 2 Ǡ] ƝƔȴ R ȏƢƐƣƦƘƣơƤ] ȏƢƐƣƦƘƣơƟ ƀ nec plura T ȏƢȰƣ Ʀȶ ƦƐƞơƤ] ȏƢƘƣƦƘƞƑƤ r 3 ȏƢƘƣƏƟƫ] ƘǮƤ ǂƟƫ r

sch. 29b – sch. 43

67

39 ǎƟ ƇƣƔƩʎƟƜ : ƢƮƞƜƤ żƘƦƦƔƞƒƔƤ ƘǮƤ ǡƟ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ ƝƔƦʫƝƚƥƘƟ ƗƜȮ ƦȶƟ Ʀơʝ ǶƨȵƦơƧ ƨƮƟơƟ ƝƔƦȮ ƦȶƟ ƟƮμơƟ. L T r(MR) 1 ƢƮƞƜƤ żƘƦƦƔƞƒƔƤ: cf. sch. D Hom. Il. 2.682; sch. Ap. Rh. 122, 6–7; ibid. 111, 1; Steph. Byz. 632, 12 ; Eust. Il. I 498, 10 1 lm. deest in TR; (ƾƟƏƥƦƔƦơƜ n.) R ƢƮƞƜƤ T: ƢƮƞ L (cf. ad sch. 7a.1) post żƘƦƦƔƞƒƔƤ add. ǟ ƇƣƔƩƜƟƒƔ T ƘǮƤ ǡƟ ... ƝƔƦʫƝƚƥƘƟ, usu recentiore, L: ǎƟ ɓ ... ƝƔƦʫƝƚƥƘƟ T: ƘǮƤ ǡƟ ... μƘƦʫƝƚƥƘƟ Bernardakis 58 ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ] ǿ ǧƣ. r ƦȶƟ om. R 2 Ʀơʝ om. TM ƨƮƟơƟ Trr et manus recentior in margine L: ƟƮμơƧ L

40 ƠƐƟʪ ƢƔƣŪ ƾƟƗƣƒ : Ʀʭ žƑƧƝƜ ȁƤ ǤƟ ƢƔʎƤ džμƨƜƦƣƯƫƟơƤ ƾƗƘƞƨơʝŭ ƝƔȴ ǧƥƒơƗơƤ

ƇƣƚƩʎƟƔ ƗƐ ƦơƜ ƢƔƣƘƞƔƯƟƫ ǎƤ žƑƧƝƔ ǂƟƔƝƦƔ. L r(MR) 2 ǧƥƒơƗơƤ: Sc. 353–4 1 lm. deest in R; (ƝƘʎƟơƤ n.) R žƑƧƝƜ] KƯƧƝƜ r ƢƔʎƤ džμƨƜƦƣƯƫƟơƤ (džμƨƜƦƣƜ- ƀ) inv. ordine r 3 ƇƣƚƩʎƟƔ] ƦƣƜƩƒƟƔ r Ɨȱ ƦơƜ ƢƔƣƘƞƔȹƟƫ ex Hesiodo Brunck1 praeeuntibus Lascaris (ƗƐ ƦơƜ ƢƔƣƘƞƏƧƟƫƟ) et Heath 81 qui ƢƔƣƘƞƔƯƟƫ legendum esse iusserat: ƗȰ ƢƔƣƘƞƔƯƟƫ r: ƗѴ ǒƦơƜμơƜ ƢƔƣƘƞƔƯƟơμƘƟ L 4 žƑƧƝƔ] KƯƧƝƔ r

42 (ƔȎƦơʝ): ƾƟƦȴ ȏƢȰƣ ƔȎƦơʝ. Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

43 (ƥƩƘƗȶƟ ƗŪ ǎƢƒƥƦƔμƔƜ): ȏƢơƢƦƘƯƫ, ȏƢơƟơʬ, ơDzơμƔƜ. L 1 lm. add. Lascaris

68

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

45 ƾƝƑƣƧƝƦơƤ μƐƟƘƜ : ǂƥƚμơƤ, ơȎ μƚƟƧƮμƘƟơƤ ȃƢơƧ ƢơƦŪ ǎƥƦƜƟŭ ȁƟ ơȎƗƘȴƤ ǎƞƛȺƟ ƝƚƣƯƦƦƘƜ ƝƔȴ ƾƢƔƖƖƐƞƞƘƜ Ƣơʝ ƢơƦŪ ǎƥƦƒƟ. L r(R) 1 lm. deest in R ƢơƦƐ R

ƢơƦŪ] ƢơƦƐ R

2 ƝƚƣƯƦƦƘƜ ƝƔȴ ƾƢƔƖƖƐƞƞƘƜ inv. ordine R

ƢơƦŪ]

46–7 ƦơƜƔƯƦƚƟ ǎμơȴ | ƗƐƞƦơƟ ƞƜƢưƟ : ȟƤ Ʀơʝ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ ƦƯƢơƟ ƗƜƔƛƑƝƚƤ ƖƣƏƪƔƟƦơƤ ƘǮƤ ƗƐƞƦơƟ ƝƔȴ ƝƔƦƔƞƘƞơƜƢƮƦơƤ ȟƤ ƘǮ μȲ ǒƞƛơƜ ƗƜȮ ƦơƥơƯƦơƧ ƩƣƮƟơƧ ƖƟʬƟƔƜ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƦƘƞƘƧƦʬƟƦƔ μƘƦȮ ƦơȸƤ ƜƘŪ μʀƟƔƤ ƾƟƔƖƟơʝƥƔƟ ƢơƜʀƥƔƜ ƔȎƦȲƟ ƦȮ ǎƟƦƘƦƔƞμƐƟƔ. L r(MR); cf. retractationem in T 1–4 totum sch. ita rescripsit T: ǒơƜƝƘƟ ǿ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ ƦƯƢơƟ ƗƜƔƛƑƝƚƤ ƖƣƏƪƔƤ ƝƔƦƔƞƜƢƘʎƟ Ʀʁ ƖƧƟƔƜƝȴ ȟƤ ƘDzƢƘƣ ơȎƝ ǎƞƘȹƥƘƦƔƜ ƗƜȮ ƦơƯƦơƧ Ʀơʝ ƩƣƮƟơƧ ƖƟʬƟƔƜ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƦƘƞƘƧƦƑƥƔƟƦƔ ƝƔȴ ƢơƜʀƥƔƜ ƦȮ ƗƜƔƦƘƦƔƖμƐƟƔ 1 lm. scripsi: ƗƐƞƦơƟ ƞƜƢȺƟ ǒƥƦƘƜƩƘƟ L: ƗƐƞƦơƟ ƞơƜƢȺƟ (sic) ƀ: deest in TR; (ƞƜƢȺƟ n.) R 2 ƝƔƦƔƞƘƞơƜƢƮƦơƤ] ƾƢơƞƒƢơƟƦơƤ r ȟƤ om. r (del. iam Papageorgiou, sed iniuria; nam ȣƥƦƘ h.l. valet) ǒƞƛơƜ] ǒƞƛƚ ƀ 3 ƦơƥơƯƦơƧ] Ʀȶ Ʀơʝ ƀ ƝƔȴ add. Brunck1 4 ƾƟƔƖƟơʝƥƔƟ] ƾƟƔƖƟơʝƥƔ r ƔȎƦȲƟ Lascaris: ƔȎƦȶƟ L: ƔȎƦʬƟ r

48 ƛƘơʎƤ ƾƣʬμƔƜ : ƘȒƩơμƔƜ μƚƗȰƟ ƞƧƢƚƣȶƟ ǎƖƖƘƖƣƔμμƐƟơƟ ǒƩơƧƥƔƟ ƞƔƕƘʎƟŭ ƢƚμơƟʀƤ ǂƦƘƣ. L r(MR); cf. retractationem in T 1 ƾƣɱƥƛƔƜ per ƘȒƩƘƥƛƔƜ explicatur e.g. in sch. D Hom. Il. 9.240; Hesych. Ɣ 6985; Ɔ Ɣ 958; Ɔb Ɣ 2091 = Phot. Ɣ 2766 = Su. Ɣ 3743 1–2 sch. ita reformavit T: ǣƟ ƨƚƥƜƟ ƘȒƩơμƔƜ ƦơʎƤ ƛƘơʎƤ ƞƔƕƘʎƟ ƝƔȴ ƾƟƔƖƟʬƟƔƜ μƚƗȰƟ ƞƧƢƚƣȶƟ ǎƖƖƘƖƣƔμμƐƟơƟ ǒƩơƧƥƔƟŭ ƦơʝƦơ Ɩȯƣ ǎƥƦƜ Ʀȶ ǂƦƘƣ ƢƚμơƟʀƤ 1 lm. deest in TR; (ƛƘơʎƤ ƾƣʬμƔƜ n.) R; accuratiss. vv. 47–8 ƦȲƟ ǎƖȺ – ƞƔƕƘʎƟ ǎƖƖƘƖƣƔμμƐƟơƟ T (Lascaris): ǎƖƖƘƖƣƔμμƐƟƚƟ Lrr 2 ƞƔƕƘʎƟ (pr.)] ƞƫƕƘʎƟ r lacunam statui et e.g. supplevi coll. retractatione in T; vide Xenis ƢƚμơƟʀƤ ǂƦƘƣ] ‘fortasse delenda’ Papageorgiou xvii

sch. 45 – sch. 54

69

50 ƢƔƟƗƏƝƣƧƦŪ ǾƗƯƣμƔƦƔ : ƗƜȮ ƢƔƟƗƔƝƣƯƦƫƟ ǾƗƧƣμƏƦƫƟ ȟƤ Ʀȶ ƗƜƏ ƦŪ ǒƟƦƘƔ ƝƔȴ μƐƞƔƟ ƔǵμƔ. L r(MR) 1–2 cf. sch. Eur. Or. 462 ƢơƞƞȮ ƗȰ ƨƜƞȳμƔƦŪ ǎƠȱƢƞƚƥƘ: ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƢơƞƞʬƟ ƨƜƞƚμȯƦƫƟ μƘ ǎƠƘƢƞȳƣƫƥƘƟ, ȟƤ Ʀȶ [ž 298] «ƗƜȯ ƦŪ ǒƟƦƘƔ ƝƔȴ μȱƞƔƟ ƔǵμƔ»; sch. Hom. Il. 10.298b ƗƜȯ ƦŪ ǒƟƦƘƔ ƝƔȴ μȱƞƔƟ ƔǵμƔ: ...ƝƔȴ ȃƦƜ ƢƦʬƥƜƤ ǎƟȳƞƞƔƝƦƔƜ ƗƜŪ ǎƟƦȱƫƟ ƝƔȴ μȱƞƔƟơƤ ƔdzμƔƦơƤ...; sch. Il. 15.1b1, b2; sch. Eur. Or. 103; id. Phoen. 128 2 Hom. Il. 10. 298, 469; 23.806 1 lm. deest in r; (ŸƚƜƏƟƘƜƣƔ v. 49 n.) R ȟƤ Ʀȶ] ƝƔȴ ȋμƚƣơƤ r

52 (ƨƣƘƟơʝƟ): ƟơƧƛƘƦƘʎƟ, ƘǮƤ ƨƣƮƟƚƥƜƟ ǂƖƘƜƟ. Ls.l. Ts.l. r(R) 1 cf. Hesych. ƨ 869 ƨƣƘƟơʝƟŭ ƨƣơƟƘʎƟ ƗƜƗȯƥƝƘƜƟ, ƟơƧƛƘƦƘʎƟ (Soph. Tr. 52); id. ƨ 870, 872, ƨ 861 †ƨƣƘƟƘʎƟ†ŭ ƨƣơƟƘʎƟ ƗƜƗȯƥƝƘƜƟ 1 lm. add. Lascaris; (ƨƣƘƟơʝƟ n.) R ƟơƧƛƘƦƘʎƟ T (Lascaris): ƟơƧƛƘƦơʝƟ L: ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƟơƧƛƘƦʬƟ R ƟơƧƛƘƦƘʎƟ post ǂƖƘƜƟ transp. T ƟơƧƛƘƦʬƟ (sic; voluisset fortasse ƟơƧƛƘƦơʝƟƦƔ) ƘǮƤ ƨƣƮƟƚƥƜƟ ǂƖƘƜƟ dubitanter rescripsit Wansink 96 ǂƖƘƜƟ] ǂƖƫƟ R

53 Ʀȶ ƥƮƟ : Ʀȶ ƥơȴ ƥƧμƨƐƣơƟ Ǡ ƦƮƥơƟ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǾƞƒƖơƟ. L r(R); cf. gl. in Ts.l. 1 lm. deest in R; (Ʀȶ ƥȶƟ n.) R Ʀȶ ƥơȴ – fin.] ƦơƥơʝƦơƟ ǢƖơƧƟ ǾƞƒƖơƟ gl. ad ƦƮƥơƟ nec plura T ƥơƜ om. R ƦƮƥơƟ] Ʀȶ ƥȶƟ R

54 ƢʬƤ ƢƔƜƥȴ μȰƟ ƦơƥơʎƥƗƘ ƢƞƚƛƯƘƜƤ : ǤƥƔƟ ƖȮƣ ƔȎƦʁ ƢƔʎƗƘƤ ǎƠ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ țƞƞơƤ, žƦƑƥƜƢƢơƤ, ŷƞʀƟơƤ, ȇƗƒƦƚƤŭ ǒƥƦƜ ƗȰ ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ ƝƔȴ ǓƦƘƣơƤ țƞƞơƤ ǎƝ ƀƘƞƒƦƚƤ. L T r(ƀR) 1–3 cf. Apollod. II 165 ŸƚƜƔƟƘȵƣƔƤ ƦʀƤ ƃǮƟȱƫƤ țƞƞơƤ žƦȳƥƜƢƢơƤ ŷƞƚƟȶƤ ȆƟƘȵƦƚƤ (ŷƞƚƟȶƤ ȆƟƘƒƦƚƤ Galeus: ƖƞƚƝƜƥơƟƘƒƦƚƤ codd.); Diod. Sic. IV.37.1–2 ǎƦȱƝƟƫƥƘ ƗȰ ƝƔȴ ǎƝ ƦʀƤ ŸƚƜƔƟƘȵƣƔƤ ƟƘƫƦȱƣơƧƤ Ʀơʝ țƞƞơƧ ƧǯơȸƤ Ɨȹơ, ŷƞƚƟȱƔ ƝƔȴ ȇƗȵƦƚƟ; Hes. fr. 25.17–9 M.–W. … Ɲś[Ɣȴ ǎƢȵ]ƨ[ƣ]ơƟƔ ŸƚƬȯƟƘƜƣƔƟ, ǡ ƦȱƩŪ ȏƢơƗμƚƛƘʎ[ƥƔ ƕȵƚƜ ǧƣ]ƔƝƞƚś[Ƙ]ȵƚƜ țƞƞơƟ ƝƔȴ ŷƞʀƟơƟ ƝƔśȴś [žƦȳ]ƥśƜƢƢơƟ ƝƔȴ ȆƟƘȵƦƚƟ

70

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

1 lm. deest in TR; (ƢƔƜƥȴ n.) R 1 ǤƥƔƟ ƖȮƣ ƔȎƦʁ ƢƔʎƗƘƤ] ȃƦƜ (ƝƔȴ Ƈa) ƢƔʎƗƘƤ ǤƥƔƟ ƔȎƦʁ T 2 țƞƞơƤ] țƞƞƔƤ r ŷƞʀƟơƤ, ȇƗƒƦƚƤ Hemsterhuys (ultimum nomen ex Diod. Sic. l.c.) in ſơƧƝƜƔƟơʝ ƆƔμơƥƔƦƐƫƤ NjƢƔƟƦƔ. Luciani Samosatensis Opera cum nova versione T. Hemsterhusii & I.M. Gesneri, Tomus I, Amstelodami 1743, 237 prob. Heath 81 (de accentu ŷƞʀƟơƤ praecipit Hdn. ƝƔƛ. Ƣƣơƥ. I 176, 11 (ex Theognosto); coni. Turnebus 121; cf. Valckenaer 66v ‘ŷƞƚƟȶƤ credo corruptum’): ƖƞƚƟơƥơƞƒƦƚƤ LT: ƦƞƚƟơƥơƞƒƦƚƤ r: ŷƞƚƟƮƤ, ȆƞƒƦƚƤ Lascaris: ŷƞʀƟơƤ, ȆƟƘȵƦƚƤ Dindorf 68 (cf. Hes. fr. 25.19) ǒƥƦƜ] ǤƟ T: ǒƦƜ ƀ 3 țƞƞơƤ] țƞƞƔƤ r ƀƘƞƒƦƚƤ] ƀƘƞƒƦƦƚƤ ƀ: ƀơƞƒƦƦƚƤ R

56–7 ƘǮ ƢƔƦƣȶƤ |ƟƐμơƜ ƦƜƟŪ ȢƣƔƟ : ȢƣƔƟ ƨƣơƟƦƒƗƔŭ ƝƔȴ ǧƥƒơƗơƤ

Ȣƣƚ ƖƏƣ ƦŪ ǾƞƒƖƚ ƢƐƞƘƦƔƜ. ǿ ƗȰ ƟơʝƤ, dzƟƔ μƏƛɾƤ ƘǮ ƨƣơƟƦƒƙƘƜ Ʀơʝ ƢƔƦƣȶƤ ȏƢȰƣ Ʀơʝ ƗơƝƘʎƟ ƝƔƞȮ ƗƜƔƢƣƏƦƦƘƥƛƔƜ. L Ts.l. r(MR); cf. etiam gl. in Ts.l. 1–2 ȢƣƔƟ – ƢƐƞƘƦƔƜ: cf. Harp. 155, 2–3 …ȢƣƚƟ ƖȮƣ ǒƞƘƖơƟ ƦȲƟ ƨƣơƟƦƒƗƔŭ Ȣƣƚ ƖƏƣ ƦŪ ǾƞƒƖƚ ƢƐƞƘƦƔƜ ƟƘƜƝƐƫƟ ƦŪ ƾƖơƣƐƫƟ ƦƘ; Su. ƫ 158 … ȣƣƔ ƖȮƣ ǟ ƨƣơƟƦƒƤŭ ǧƥƒơƗơƤŭ Ȣƣƚ ƖƏƣ ƦŪ ǾƞƒƖƚ ƢƐƞƘƦƔƜ ƟƘƜƝƐƫƟ… 1 ƨƣơƟƦƒƗƔ: cf. e.g. sch. OC ȢƣƔƟ] ƨƣơƟƦƒƗƔ; sch. Aesch. Pr. 17 (cod. M) ǎƠƫƣƜƏƙƘƜƟ] ǒƠƫ ȢƣƔƤ ƝƔȴ ƨƣơƟƦƒƗơƤ ƢơƜƘʎƥƛƔƜ; sch. Ar. Ra. 481b; sch. Hes. Op. 30 …ƪƜƞơʝƦƔƜ ƗȰ Ʀȶ Ȣƣƚŭ ƟʝƟ ƖȮƣ ƦȲƟ ƨƣơƟƦȵƗƔ ƥƚμƔȵƟƘƜ…; sch. Hom. Od. 12.89 … ȢƣƔ ƖȮƣ ǟ ƨƣơƟƦƒƤ; Su. ơ 165; ƫ 149; ƫ 150; ǧƥȵơƗơƤ: Op. 30 1 lm.] ƟƐμơƜ ƦƜƟŪ ȣƣƔ (sic) M: deest in TR; (ȣƣƔƟ n.) R; pars ǿ ƗȰ ƟơʝƤ – fin. ad vv. 56–7 ƘǮ ƢƔƦƣȶƤ – ƗơƝƘʎƟ spectat 1 ȢƣƔƟ (alt.) – 3 ƟơʝƤ] om. T in margine sed praebuit ƨƣơƟƦƒƗƔ ut gl. ad ȢƣƔƟ 1 ȣƣƔƟ (alt.) spiritu aspero Lrr ƨƣơƟƦƒƗƔ] ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƨ. r ƝƔȴ] ȟƤ ƝƔȴ R 2 ƢƐƞƘƦƔƜ om. M post ƢƐƞƘƦƔƜ add. ƟƘƜƝƐƫƟ ƦŪ ƾƖơƣƐƫƟ R 3 ƢƔƦƣȶƤ] Ƣ. ƥơƧ r ƝƔƞȮ scripsi: ƝƔƞʬƤ codd.; ƝƔƞʬƤ ƢƣƏƥƥƘƜƟ apud poetam sensu ƘȔ ƢơƜƘʎƟ grammaticus accepit, ut videtur; vide Xenis 4 ƗƜƔƢƣƏƦƦƘƥƛƔƜ] ƢƣƏƦƦƘƜƟ Ƈ: ƗƜƔƦƣƏƢƦƘƥƛƔƜ sic M post ƢƣȯƦƦƘƜƟ add. ǎƝƘʎƟơƟ Ƈ

58 ƾƣƦƒƢơƧƤ : ȃ ǎƥƦƜƟ ƾƣƦƒƫƤ ƝƔȴ ǟƣμơƥμƐƟƫƤ Ʀʭ ƝƔƜƣʭ ƢơƣƘƯƘƦƔƜ. L r(MR) 1 aliter sch. Hom. Il. 9.505b. ƾƣƦȵƢơƤ: ǿ ƦơȸƤ ƢȷƗƔƤ ǿƞȷƝƞƚƣơƤ; sch. D Hom. Il. 9.505 ƾƣƦƒƢơƤ: ǂƣƦƜơƤ ƝƔȴ ȏƖƜȲƤ ƦơʎƤ ƢơƥƒƟ; Hesych. Ɣ 7517 ƾƣƦȵƢơƧƤ· ǂƣƦƜơƤ ƦơʎƤ ƢơƥȵƟ, ȏƖƜȷƢơƧƤ (Ž 501); id. Ɣ 7518 ƾƣƦȵƢơƧƟ· ȏƖƜʀ ƦơȸƤ ƢȷƗƔƤ ǒƩơƟƦƔ; Ɔ Ɣ 973 ƾƣƦȵƢơƧƤŭ ȏƖƜƘʎƤ ƦơȸƤ ƢȷƗƔƤ ǒƩƫƟ = Phot. Ɣ 2900 = Su. Ɣ 4046 1 lm.] ǎƖƖȸƤ ƗŪ ȁ ƀ: deest in R; (ƔȎƦȶƤ n.) R; accuratiss. ƾƣƦƒƢơƧƤ ƛƣʫƥƝƘƜ

sch. 54 – sch. 65

71

59 (ƢƣȶƤ ƝƔƜƣƮƟ): ƝƔƦȮ ƝƔƜƣƮƟ. Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

60 (ƦƾƟƗƣƒ ): Ʀʭ țƞƞʪ. Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

61 (ƾƖƘƟƟƑƦƫƟ): ƗƧƥƖƘƟʬƟ. L 1 Hesych. Ɣ 443 ƾƖƘƟƟȳƦƫƟŭ ƗƧƥƖƘƟʬƟ 1 lm. add. Brunck2; (ƝƾƠ ƾƖƘƟƟƑƦƫƟ s.) L

63 ǎƞƘƯƛƘƣơƟ ƞƮƖơƟ : ƥƢơƧƗƔʎơƟ ƝƔȴ ǎƞƘƧƛƐƣʪ ƢƣƐƢơƟƦƔ. L Ts.l. r(MR) 1 lm. ex M: deest in cett.; (ǎƞƘƯƛƘƣơƟ ƞƮƖơƟ n.) R ƥƢơƧƗƔʎơƟ] ƥƢơƧƗƔȵʪ Ƈ

64 ƘǮ ƗƜƗƔƝƦƏ μơƜ : ƘǮ ƢƣơƥƑƝƘƜ μơƜ μƔƛƘʎƟ. Ls.l. Ts.l. r(MR) 1 lm. ex M: deest in cett.; (μơƜ n.) R

μơƜ om. R

65 (ǎƠƘƟƫμƐƟơƧ): ǎƟ ƠƐƟɾ ƗƜƔƦƣƒƕơƟƦơƤ. L Ts.l. r(MR) 1 sch Eur. Hipp. 1085 ƢȯƞƔƜ ƠƘƟơʝƥƛƔƜ: ǎƢȴ ƠȱƟƚƤ ƖʀƤ ƗƜƔƦƣȵƕƘƜƟ... 1 hoc sch. cum sch. pr. c. in Ƈr lm. add. Brunck2 ƠƐƟɾ] Ơ. Ɩʀ r ƗƜƔƦƣƒƕơƟƦơƤ Stephanus 333: ƗƜƔƦƣƒƕơƟƦƔ Lrr: ƗƜƔƦƣƒƕơƟƦƜ (ex μơƜ scholii 64 pendet) T

72

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

68 (ǯƗƣʝƥƛƔƜ): ƗƜƏƖƘƜƟ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

69 ǂƣơƦơƟ : ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǎƟƜƔƧƦƮƟŭ ǃƢƔƠ ƖȮƣ Ʀơʝ ǒƦơƧƤ ƾƣơƦƣƜɱƦƔƜ ǟ Ɩʀ. L T r(MR) 1 cf. sch. 824–5 et 825a; Hesych. Ɣ 7375 ƾƣơƦơȹƤ· ǎƟƜƔƧƦơȹƤ. ƆơƨơƝƞʀƤ ƇƣƔƩƜƟȵƔƜƤ (69); Ɔb Ɣ 2137 ƾƣƮƦơƧƤŭ ƦơȸƤ ǎƟƜƔƧƦơƯƤ. ơȓƦƫ ƆơƨơƝƞʀƤ = Phot. Ɣ 2850; Eust. Il. III 88, 13–4 ...ǎƝ Ʀơʝ ƾƣȷƦơƧ, ȁƤ ơȎ μȷƟơƟ Ʀȶ Ʀơʝ ƾƣơƦƣƜɱƟ ǒƣƖơƟ Ɨƚƞơʎ, ƾƞƞȮ ƝƔȴ ƦȶƟ ǎƟƜƔƧƦȶƟ ƢƔƣȮ ƆơƨơƝƞƘʎ... 1 lm. ex ƇR (Lascaris): ƦȶƟ μȰƟ ƢƔƣƘƞƛƮƟƦŪ ǂƣơƦƣơƟ (ǂƣơƦƣơƟ sic) L: ƦŪ ǂƣơƦơƟ (sic) M qui ǂƣơƦơƟ duplicat in initio scholii; (ǂƣơƦơƟ n.) R ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ] ƦȶƟ Ƈ Ʀơʝ ǒƦơƧƤ] Ʀơʝ ǎƟƜƔƧƦơʝ Ƈ ƾƣơƦƣƜɱƦƔƜ] ƾƣƫ- ƀ

70a (ſƧƗʁ ƖƧƟƔƜƝƒ ): Ʀʁ ȆμƨƏƞɾ. Ls.l. T 1 sch.7 70a, b, c in unum ita composuit Ƈ: ȟƤ ƞȯƦƣƜƟ ƝƔȴ ƗơʝƞơƟ ƢơƟƘʎƟ ƝƔȴ ȏƢƚƣƘƦƘʎƟ Ʀʁ Ȇμƨȯƞɾ lm. add. Elmsley

70b (ƞƏƦƣƜƟ): ƗơʝƞơƟ. Ls.l. T 1 cf. sch. Eur. Hec. 609 (ad lm. ƾƣƩƔƒƔ ƞƏƦƣƜ) ƢƔƞƔƜȮ ȏƢƚƣƐƦƜƤ, ƗơƯƞƚ et sch. Eur. Phoen. 220 ubi ƞƏƦƣƜƤ per ƗơƯƞƚ redditur; Ar. Byz. Nom. aet. 279, 19 Miller ſȯƦƣƜƤ· ǿ ǎƢƜμȵƥƛƜơƤ· ƦȶƟ ƖȮƣ μƜƥƛȶƟ ƞȯƦƣơƟ ǒƞƘƖơƟ· ƟʝƟ ƗȰ ƝƔȴ ǿ ƗơʝƞơƤ; Hesych. ƞ 406 ƞƏƦƣƜƘƤŭ ƗơʝƞơƜ; ibid. ƞ 408 ƞƏƦƣƜƤŭ … ƗơƯƞƚ; Ɔ ƞ 35 = ƞƏƦƣƜƤŭ ƛƘƣƏƢƔƜƟƔ, ƗơƯƞƚ, ƢƣơƥƔƒƦƚƤ. = Phot. ƞ 115 = Su. ƞ 147 1 de Ƈ vide ad sch. 70a lm. add. Elmsley

70c (ƢơƟƘʎƟ): ȏƢƚƣƘƦƘʎƟ. Ls.l. T 1 de Ƈ vide ad sch. 70a lm. add. Elmsley

sch. 68 – sch. 74

73

71 ƢɱƟ ƦơƒƟƧƟ ƘǮ ƝƔȴ ƦơʝƦŪ ǒƦƞƚ : ƾƝơƯƥƘƦƔƜ ƦơƒƟƧƟ ƦƜƤ ȃƦƜ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ ƢɱƟ ƔǮƥƩƣȶƟ ȏƢƐμƘƜƟƘƟ, ƘǮ ƾƞƚƛʬƤ ȏƢƐƥƦƚ Ʀȶ ƗơƧƞƘƯƘƜƟ Ʀʁ ȆμƨƏƞɾ. L Ts.l. r(MR); cf. retractationem in T 1–2 sch. ita refecit Ƈ: ƾƝơƯƘƦƔƜ ƖȮƣ ȃƦƜ ƢɱƟ ƔǮƥƩƣȶƟ ȏƢƐμƘƜƟƘƟ ƝƔȴ DzƥƫƤ ƾƝơƧƥƛȳƥƘƦƔƜ ƝƔȴ ƦơʝƦơ 1 lm.] ƘǮ ƝƔȴ Ʀơʝ (sic pro ƦơʝƦŪ) ƀ: deest in TR; (ƦơƒƟƧƟ n.) R; accuratiss. ƢɱƟ ƦơƒƟƧƟ – ƝƞƯơƜ ƦƜƤ ǂƟ ƦơȵƟƧƟ] ƢƏƟƧ r 2 Ʀȶ] Ʀơʝ ƀ: om. R

72 (ǎƠƔƨƘʎƦƔƜ ƦơʝƗƘ): ƾƨƘƒƛƚ, ƾƢƚƞƞƏƖƚ, Ʀơʝ ƗơƧƞƘƯƘƜƟ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. addidi; scholiastam ǎƠƔƨƘƒƛƚ pro ǎƠƔƨƘʎƦƔƜ legisse coni. Valckenaer 66v ƾƢƚƞƞƏƖƚ om. T Ʀơʝ ƗơƧƞƘƯƘƜƟ] ƦʀƤ ƗơƧƞƘƒƔƤ T post ƦʀƤ ƗơƧƞƘƒƔƤ add. ƗƚƞơƟȷƦƜ T

74 ŹȎƕơʎƗƔ ƩưƣƔƟ : ǒƟƜơƒ ƨƔƥƜ ƝƔȴ żƘƥƥƔƞƒƔƤ ƘǴƟƔƜ ƃǮƩƔƞƒƔƟŭ ơȎƗȰƟ ƗȰ ǂƦơƢơƟ ƥƧƟƫƟƧμƘʎƟ. L r(MR); cf. retractationem in T 1 ǒƟƜơƜ scil. Homerus; cf. sch. Hom. Il. 2.596 ƃǮƩƔƞȵƚƛƘƟ {ǮȷƟƦƔ}: ȃƦƜ żƘƥƥƔƞȵƔƤ ǟ ƃǮƩƔƞȵƔ ƝƔƛŪ ȋμƚƣơƟ. ơǯ ƗȰ ƟƘȻƦƘƣơƜ ǎƢŪ ŹȎƕơȵƔƤ ƢƘƢơƜȳƝƔƥƜƟ; ibid. 2.730 {ơdz ƦŪ ǒƩơƟ} ƃǮƩƔƞȵƚƟ: ȃƦƜ ơȎ ƦʀƤ ŹȎƕơȵƔƤ ǟ ƃǮƩƔƞȵƔ ƝƔƛŪ ȋμƚƣơƟ, ȟƤ ƢƔƣȮ ƦơʎƤ ƟƘƫƦȱƣơƜƤ, ƾƞƞȮ ƦʀƤ żƘƥƥƔƞȵƔƤ; sch. Ap. Rh. 14, 14–7 …ƃǮƩƔƞȵƔƤ ƗȰ ƦʀƤ ǎƟ ŹȎƕơȵɯ. ơǯ ƖȮƣ ƟƘȻƦƘƣơȵ ƨƔƥƜƟ ǎƟ ŹȎƕơȵɯ ƘǴƟƔƜ, ȋμƚƣơƤ ƗȰ ǎƟ Ʀʭ ƄƘƞƔƥƖƜƝʭ NJƣƖƘƜ ƝƔƦƔƞȱƖƘƜ ƦȲƟ ƃǮƩƔƞȵƔƟ (Ŷ 730)· «ơdz ƦŪ ǒƩơƟ ƃǮƩƔƞȵƚƟ ƢȷƞƜƟ ŹȎƣȹƦơƧ ƃǮƩƔƞƜʀơƤ», ơǯ ƗȰ ǿμȻƟƧμȷƟ ƨƔƥƜƟ; Strab. IX 5, 17 ƦȲƟ ƗŪ ƃǮƩƔƞȵƔƟ ƢȷƞƜƟ ŹȎƣȹƦơƧ ƞƘƖơμȱƟƚƟ ǒƟ ƦƘ ƦơʎƤ ƦȷƢơƜƤ ƦơȹƦơƜƤ (scil. ǎƟ żƘƦƦƔƞƒɯ) ǯƥƦơƣơʝƥƜ ƝƔȴ ǎƟ ŹȎƕơȵɯ ƝƔȴ ǎƟ džƣƝƔƗȵɯ; Id. VIII, 3, 6; Id. VIII 3, 25 ƔȎƦơʝ Ɨȱ ƢơƧ ƝƔȴ ǟ ƃǮƩƔƞȵƔ ǎƥƦȴƟ ǟ Ʀơʝ ŹȎƣȹƦơƧ ǟ ƟʝƟ džƟƗƔƟȵƔ, ƢơƞȵƩƟƜơƟ džƣƝƔƗƜƝȶƟ ǿμȻƟƧμơƟ Ʀʭ żƘƦƦƔƞƜƝʭ ƝƔȴ Ʀʭ ŹȎƕơƬƝʭ; Steph. Byz. 487, 18 – 488, 4; aliter sch. 352–5 1–2 sch. 74 et 79 in unum ita composuit Ƈ: ǒƞƘƖƐƟ μơƜ, ƨƚƥƒƟ, ȃƦƜ ǎƟ ƃǮƩƔƞƒɯ ƦƘƛƟƑƠơμƔƜ Ǡ ƥƫƛƘȴƤ ƘȎƗƔƜμơƟƑƥƫ ƦȶƟ ǎƢƒƞơƜƢơƟ ƩƣƮƟơƟ. Ƣơʝ ơȔƟ ƾƖƖƐƞƞƘƦƔƜ Ǡ ƙʬƟ ƘǴƟƔƜ Ǡ ƛƔƟưƟ; ƨƔƥȴ ƗȰ ƝƔȴ ǎƟ żƘƦƦƔƞƒɯ ƘǴƟƔƜ ƃǮƩƔƞƒƔƟŭ ơȎƗȰƟ ơȔƟ ǂƦơƢơƟ ƥƧƟƫƟƧμƘʎƟ. 1 lm.] ŹȎƕơʎƗƔ ƀ qui hoc vocabulum addito ƩưƣƔƟ duplicat tamquam partem scholii; (ŹȎƕơʎƗƔ n.) R; accuratiss. ŹȎƕơʎƗƔ – ƢƮƞƜƟ ǒƟƜơƜ] ǒƟƜơƤ ƀ: ǎƟƒơƜƤ R ƨƔƥƜ] ƨƚƥƜ ƀ ƝƔȴ om. R żƘƥƥƔƞƒƔƤ] żƘƥƥƔƞƒơƧƤ R 1–2 ơȎƗȰƟ ƗȰ] ơȎƗȰ r

74

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

77 ƦʀƥƗƘ ƦʀƤ ƩưƣƔƤ : ƦʀƤ ŹȎƕơƒƔƤ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. deest in T

79 ȣƤ ơǯ ƦƘƞƘƧƦȲƟ Ʀơʝ ƕƒơƧ : ǒƞƘƖƘƟ, ƨƚƥƒƟ, ȃƦƜ ǎƟ ƃǮƩƔƞƒɯ ƦƘƛƟƑƠơμƔƜ Ǡ ƥƫƛƘȴƤ ƘȎƗƔƜμơƟƑƥƫ ƦȶƟ ǎƢƒƞơƜƢơƟ ƩƣƮƟơƟ. L r(MR); cf. retractationem in T 1–2 de T vide ad sch. 74.1–2 1 lm.] ơǯ ƦƘƞƘƧƦȲƟ Ʀơʝ ƀ: deest in TR; (ƦƘƞƘƧƦȲƟ n.) R; accuratiss. vv. 79–81 ȟƤ ơǯ – ǒƩƘƜƟ; ǒƞƘƖƘƟ L: ǒƞƘƖȱ μơƜ T ƦƘƛƟƑƠơμƔƜ] ƦƘƛƟƑƙơμƔƜ ƀ 2 Ǡ] ƘǮ r ƘȎƗƔƜμơƟƑƥƫ] ƘȎƗƔƜμơƟƒƥƫ r

82 ǎƟ ơȔƟ ʜơƢʁ ƦơƜɲƗƘ : ǎƟ ƝƜƟƗƯƟʪ ƝƔȴ ǎƢȴ ƠƧƣơʝ ƾƝμʀƤ ǯƥƦƔμƐƟʪ ơȎ ƢơƣƘƯƥɾ ƥƧƞƞƚƪƮμƘƟơƤ ƔȎƦʭ ƝƔȴ ƥƧƟƔƖƫƟƜơƯμƘƟơƤ; L T r(MR) 1 ǎƟ ƝƜƟƗƯƟʪ – ǯƥƦƔμƐƟʪ: cf. sch. Thuc. V 103, 2 ǎƢȴ ʜơƢʀƤ: ȋμƚƣơƤ [ž 173] ‘ǎƢȴ ƠƧƣơʝ dzƥƦƔƦƔƜ ƾƝμʀƤŪ; Eust. Il. IV 606, 7–10 ƝƔȴ ȃƦƜ ǎƝ ƦʬƟ ȇμƚƣƜƝʬƟ ƦƔƞȯƟƦƫƟ ƞƔƕȺƟ ƆơƨơƝƞʀƤ ǒƨƚ Ʀȶ «ƕȵơƧ ʜơƢȳ» (OC 1508), ƝƔȴ Ʀȶ «ƥμƜƝƣȮ ƢƔƞƔƜȮ ƥȻμƔƦŪ ƘȎƟȯƙƘƜ ʜơƢȳ» (OT 961), ȟƤ Ʀơʝ ƢơƜƚƦƜƝơʝ ʜȱƢƘƜƟ ƝƔȴ ƦʀƤ ǎƠ ƔȎƦơʝ ʜơƢʀƤ ƦȮƤ ƛƔƟƔƦƚƣȮƤ ȏƢơƗƚƞơȹƟƦƫƟ ƔǮƦȵƔƤ. 1 lm.] ʜơƢʁ ƦơƜ (sic) M: deest in TR; (ʜơƢʁ n.)R; accuratiss. vv. 82–3 ǎƟ ơȔƟ – ƠƧƟƐƣƠƫƟ ƝƜƟƗƯƟʪ] ƝƧƟƗƯƟʪ ƀ: ƝƜƟƗƯƟơƜƤ, ƨƚƥƒ, ƦơƜơƯƦơƜƤ T ƠƧƣơʝ] Ơƚƣơʝ r 2 ƢơƣƘƯƥɾ] ƢơƣƘƯƥʪ R

ƥƧƟƔƖƫƟƜơƯμƘƟơƤ] ǎƢƔƖƫƟƜơƯμƘƟơƤ T

83 (ƠƧƟƐƣƠƫƟ): Ʀʭ ƢƔƦƣƒ. L 1 lm. add. Elmsley

86 ƘǮ ƗȰ ƛƘƥƨƏƦƫƟ ǎƖư : ƘǮ ƗȰ ƝƔȴ ǞƢƜƥƦƏμƚƟ Ǡ ƢƣơƚƝƚƝƮƘƜƟ, ƨƚƥƒƟ, ȃƦƜ ƦƔʝƦƔ ƢƣơƘʎƢƘƟ, ƢƏƞƔƜ ǀƟ ǎƖȺ ƥƧμƢƔƣƑμƚƟ ƔȎƦʭ. L Ts.l. r(MR) 1–2 sch. ita retractavit T et praebuit ut gl. ad ƝƔƦɿƗƘƜƟ: ƢƣơƚƢƜƥƦƏμƚƟ ƝƔȴ ǞƝƚƝƮƘƜƟ ȃƦƜ ƦƔʝƦƔ ƢƣơƘʎƢƘƟ 1 lm. ex Lp: ƝƔƦƑƗƘƜƟ ƦʬƟƗƘ ƀ: deest in cett.; (ƝƔƦƑƗƘƜƟ n.) R;

75

sch. 77 – sch. 94

accuratiss. vv. 86–7 ƘǮ ƗȰ – ƢƔƣʀƟ ƔȎƦʭ] ƔȎƦ. ƥ. ǎƖ. r

ƢƣơƚƝƚƝƮƘƜƟ] Ƣƣơƥ- ƀ

2 ǎƖȺ ƥƧμƢƔƣƑμƚƟ

92 ƩưƣƘƜ ƟʝƟ Ȥ ƢƔʎ : ƝƔȴ ƟʝƟ, ƨƚƥƒƟ, Ȥ ƢƔʎ, ǂƢƜƛƜŭ ƝƔȴ ƖȮƣ Ʀȶ ƕƣƔƗƐƫƤ ƦȮ ƗƐơƟƦƔ ƢơƜƘʎƟ, ǎƢƘƜƗȮƟ ƾƝơƯƥɾ ƦƜƤ, ƝƐƣƗơƤ ƾƢơƨƐƣƘƦƔƜ. ƦơƧƦƐƥƦƜ, ƝƔȴ ƘǮ ƕƣƔƗƐƫƤ ǢƝơƧƥƔƤ ƝƔȴ ȞƨƘƞƑƥƘƜƤ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƢƔƣƔƖƘƟƮμƘƟơƤ, ƝƐƣƗơƤ ƥơƜ ǒƥƦƔƜ. L T r(MR) 1 lm.] ƩưƣƘƜ ƟʝƟ ƀ: deest in ƇR; (ƩưƣƘƜ ƟʝƟ n.) R; accuratiss. vv. 92–3 ƩưƣƘƜ – ǎμƢơƞɲ ƝƔȴ ƟʝƟ om. Ƈ ƨƚƥƒƟ, Ȥ ƢƔʎ, ǂƢƜƛƜ] ǂƢ. ƗȲ ƨ., Ȥ Ƣ. Ƈ post ƢƔʎ add. ƘǮ ƝƔȴ μȲ ƢƣȷƦƘƣơƟ Ƈ Ʀȶ] ƦȲ ƀ ƝƔȴ addidi 2 ƦȮ ƗƐơƟƦƔ ƢơƜƘʎƟ] vide ad sch. 56–7.3 ƢơƜƘʎƟ] ƘǮƢƘʎƟ r 3 ƝƔȴ ƘǮ ƕƣƔƗƐƫƤ ǢƝơƧƥƔƤ ƝƔȴ ȞƨƘƞƑƥƘƜƤ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƢƔƣƔƖƘƟƮμƘƟơƤ, ƝƐƣƗơƤ ƥơƜ ǒƥƦƔƜ] ƘǮ ƝƔȴ ƕƣƔƗƐƫƤ ǢƝơƧƥƔƤ, ȞƨƘƞƑƥƘƜƤ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƝƔȴ ƖƘƟơμȱƟʪ ƥơƜ ǎƝƘʎ ƝƐƣƗơƤ ǒƥƦƔƜ sic reformavit et interpunxit Ƈ: ƝƔȴ ƘǮ ƕƣƔƗƐƫƤ ǢƝơƧƥƔƤ, ƝƔȴ ȞƨƘƞƑƥƘƜƤ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƢƔƣƔƖƘƟƮμƘƟơƤ ƝƐƣƗơƤ ƥơƜ ǒƥƦƔƜ Bernardakis 58: ƝƔȴ ƘǮ ƕƣƔƗƐƫƤ ǢƝơƧƥƔƤ ƝƔȴ (dubitanter) ȞƨƘƞƑƥƘƜƤ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƢƔƣƔƖƘƟƮμƘƟơƤ, ƝƐƣƗơƤ ƥơƜ ǒƥƦƔƜ Blaydes 28: malim ƝƔȴ ƘǮ ƕƣƔƗƐƫƤ ƾƝơƯƥƔƤ [ƝƔȴ] ȞƨƘƞƑƥƘƜƤ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƢƔƣƔƖƘƟƮμƘƟơƤ, ƝƐƣƗơƤ ƥơƜ ǒƥƦƔƜ, sed talem inconcinnitatem orationis apud scholiastam tolerandam esse puto ȞƨƘƞƑƥƘƜƤ] ȞƨƐƞƚƥƔƤ r; vide ad sch. 56–7.3 4 ǒƥƦƔƜ] ǎƥƦȴƟ r

94 ƔǮƮƞƔ ƟƯƠ : μƐƞƔƜƟƔ ȟƤ ơǯ ƟƘưƦƘƣơƜ Ǡ ƢơƜƝƒƞƚ ƗƜȮ ƦȮ ǂƥƦƣƔ ǟ ƟȸƠ Ǡ ƦƔƩƘʎƔ ƗƜȮ Ʀȶ

ƟƧƝƦȴ ƛơʁ ƢƔƣŪ ȇμƑƣʪŭ ƦƒƝƦƘƜ ƗȰ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƾƟƔƦƐƞƞƘƜƟ ƢơƜƘʎ. L T r(MR) 1 μƐƞƔƜƟƔ – 4 ȇμƑƣʪ: Hesych. Ɣ 2025 ƔǮȷƞƚ ƟȹƠ· ǢƦơƜ μȱƞƔƜƟƔ, Ǡ ƢơƜƝȵƞƚ ƗƜȮ ƦȮ ǂƥƦƣƔ. ƆơƨơƝƞʀƤ ƇƣƔƩƜƟȵƔƜƤ (94); Ɔb Ɣ 577 ƔǮȷƞƚ ƟȹƠŭ ǢƦơƜ μȱƞƔƜƟƔ, Ǡ ƢơƜƝȵƞƚ ƗƜȮ ƦȮ ǂƥƦƣƔ = Phot. Ɣ 656 = Su. ƔƜ 247, unde Zonar. 81, 9; Phot. Ɣ 610; Eust. Il. III 98, 9–11 ǶƥƦȱơƟ ƗȰ ƝƔȴ ȃƦƜ ǿ ƨƜƞȷμƚƣơƤ ƆơƨơƝƞʀƤ Ʀȶ ƛơȳ μƘƦƔƞƔƕȺƟ «ƔǮȷƞƔ ƟȹƠ» ƞȱƖƘƜ ơȎ μȷƟơƟ ƝƔƦȮ Ʀȶ ǎƟ ǂƥƦƣơƜƤ ƢơƜƝȵƞơƟ ƔȎƦʀƤ, ƝƔƛŪ ȁ ƝƔȴ ƢơƜƝƜƞƘȵμƫƟ ƢƔƣŪ ŵǮƥƩȹƞʪ ƞȱƖƘƦƔƜ, ƾƞƞȮ ƝƔȴ ƝƔƦȮ ƦȮƤ ʜƚƛƘȵƥƔƤ ȇμƚƣƜƝȮƤ ǎƟƟơȵƔƤ. (v. 395); Id. Od. I 362, 18; Hesych. Ɣ 2020 ƔǮƮƞƔŭ ƢơƜƝƒƞƔ Ǡ ƦƔƩƐƔ; Hesych Ɣ 2034 ƔǮƮƞơƤŭ ƢơƜƝƒƞơƤ Ǡ ƘȎƝƒƟƚƦơƤ…; Ɔ Ɣ 191; Phot. Ɣ 614; Su. ƔƜ 253; Apollon. S. 88, 7–9 ... Ʀȶ ƗȰ ƟƧƝƦȴ ƛơʁ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƦƔƩƘȵɯ· ǟ μȰƟ ƖȮƣ ǟμȱƣƔ ƢơƞȹμơƩƛơƤ ơȔƥƔ ƗƜȮ ƦȮ ǒƣƖƔ μƔƝƣȮ ƨƔȵƟƘƦƔƜ, ǟ ƗȰ ƟȸƠ ƗƜȮ ƦȲƟ ƾƟȯƢƔƧƥƜƟ ƦƔƩƘʎƔ; sch. D Hom. Il. 19.404; sch. Aesch. Th. 493a (cod. M) …ƔǮƮƞƚƟ ƗȰ ƦȲƟ ƘȎƝƒƟƚƦơƟ ƝƔȴ ƦƔƩƘʎƔƟ; Ɔb Ɣ 613 = Phot. Ɣ 611 3 Il. 12. 463, 14.261

76

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

1 lm.] ƔǮƮƞƚ ƟȸƠ Ƈ: ǎƟƔƣƜƙơμƐƟƔ ƀ: deest in R; (ƔǮƮƞƔ n.) R μƐƞƔƜƟƔ] ǢƖơƧƟ μ. T: μ. ƥƚμƔƒƟƘƜ Ʀȶ ƔǮƮƞƔ r ȟƤ Ƈ (Lascaris): ƝƔȴ Lrr ƢơƜƝƒƞƚ] ƢơƜƝƑƞƚ ƀ ǟ ƟȸƠ om. T 4 ƦƒƝƦƘƜ – fin. om. T

95 (ƨƞơƖƜƙƮμƘƟơƟ): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƞƏμƢơƟƦƔ. Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris

96–8 (NjƞƜơƟ – džƞƝμƑƟƔƤ): ȋμƚƣơƤ ǦƐƞƜơƤ ȁƤ ƢƏƟƦŪ ǎƨơƣɲ. L 1 ȋμƚƣơƤ: Od. 11.109 = 12.323 ǦƘƞȵơƧ, ȁƤ ƢȯƟƦŪ ǎƨơƣɲ ƝƔȴ ƢȯƟƦŪ ǎƢƔƝơȹƘƜ. 1 lm. addidi

2 ǦƐƞƜơƤ sic scholiasta: ǦƘƞƒơƧ Homerus

96 (ƔǮƦʬ ): ƢƔƣƔƝƔƞʬ. Ls.l. 1 cf. sch. Eur. Tr. 1133 ubi ɌƦƑƥƔƦơ per ƢƔƣƘƝƏƞƘƥƘƜƟ explanatur; Hesych. Ɣ 2179 ƔǮƦʬŭ ƢƔƣƔƝƔƞʬ; id. ƚ 936 ɐƦƘƜŭ ƢƔƣƘƝƏƞƘƜ; id. Ɣ 2185 1 lm. add. Brunck2

97–8 (ƦȶƟ džƞƝμƑƟƔƤ): ƦȶƟ džƞƝμƑƟƚƤ, ƞƘƒƢƘƜ ƢƔʎƗƔ. L 1 lm. addidi; verbum ƢƔʎƤ scholiastae defuisse patet praebent edd., sed pars est scholii in L

ƦȶƟ džƞƝμƑƟƚƤ] tamquam lm.

98–9 (ƢȷƛƜ μơƜ ƢƮƛƜ μơƜ ƢƔʎƤ;): ƞƘƒƢƘƜ ơǮƝƘʎ, ƗƜƔƦƣƒƕƘƜ. L; cf. gll. Ts.l. 1 lm. addidi (lm.) post ƢƔʎƤ interrogandi signum posui praeeunte Wunder 65 qui scholiastam novum membrum inde a verbis ƟƔƒƘƜ ƢơƦŪ inchoari putasse coniecerat; probat Wolff 48 ƞƘƒƢƘƜ – ƗƜƔƦƣƒƕƘƜ] ơǮƝƘʎ, ƗƜƔƦƣƒƕƘƜ gll. ad ƟƔƒƘƜ nec plura Ƈ

77

sch. 94 – sch. 102a

100a Ǡ ƢơƟƦȵơƧƤ ƔȎƞʬƟƔƤ : ƦơȸƤ ƢƔƣȮ ƛƏƞƔƦƦƔƟ ƦƮƢơƧƤ ƥƦƘƟơƯƤ, ǎƝ ƗȰ ƦơƯƦơƧ ƦȮ ƢƘƞƏƖƚ ƨƚƥƒƟŭ DŽƣƔ ơȔƟ ǎƟ ƛƔƞƏƦƦɾ ǎƥƦƒƟ; L T r(MR) 1 ƦƮƢơƧƤ ƥƦƘƟơƯƤ: cf. sch. Hom. pap. XII ad Il. 21.283 ƔśȎƞʬƟƘƤ ơǯ ƥƦƘƟơȴ ƝƔȴ ǎ[ƢƜμƑƝƘƜƤ ƦƮ]ƢśơƜ; Paus. att. Ɣ 168 ƔȎƞȻƟŭ ǒƥƦƜ μȰƟ ƦȷƢơƤ ǎƢƜμȳƝƚƤ ƝƔȴ ƥƦƘƟȶƤ ƾƖƝȯƞƔƜƤ ơǵơƟ ƢƘƣƜƘƩȷμƘƟơƤ... unde Ɔb Ɣ 2413 = Phot Ɣ 3181 1 lm.] ƔȎƞʬƟƔƤ ƀ: deest in ƇR; (ƢƮƟƦƜơƤ sic n.) R (lm.) ƢơƟƦƒơƧƤ sic L ƢƔƣȮ ƛƏƞƔƦƦƔƟ] Ƣ. ƛȯƞƔƥƥƔƟ Ƈ: ƢƘƣȴ ƛƔƞƏƥƥƚƤ r ƦƮƢơƧƤ ƥƦƘƟơƯƤ inv. ordine r post ƥƦƘƟơȸƤ add. ƔȎƞʬƟƔƤ ƝƔƞƘʎ T 2 DŽƣƔ TƀLp (Lascaris): ǂƣƔ LR

100b (ƢơƟƦƒơƧƤ ƔȎƞʬƟƔƤ): [Ǡ] ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƟƑƥơƧƤŭ ƔȎƞȺƟ ƖȮƣ Ʀȶ ƥƦƘƟƮμƔƝƣơƟ ƢƐƞƔƖơƤ, ƾƢȶ ƗȰ Ʀơʝ ƢƘƞƏƖơƧƤ Ʀȶ ƢƘƣƜƘƩƮμƘƟơƟ ȏƢŪ ƔȎƦơʝ Ɨƚƞơʎ ȃ ǎƥƦƜ ƦȮƤ ƟƑƥơƧƤ. L T r(MR) 1–3 haec a sch. pr. separavi 1 lm. addidi Ǡ delevi ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƟƑƥơƧƤ] ǎƟ ƟƑƥơƜƤ Ƈ ƔȎƞȺƟ ƖȮƣ] ƔȎƞȺƟ ƖȮƣ (ƞ ex Ʀ) L: ƔȎƞȶƤ ƗȰ T 1–2 Ʀȶ ƥƦƘƟƮμƔƝƣơƟ] ǎƥƦȴ Ʀȶ ƥƦƘƟȶƟ ƝƔȴ ǎƢȵμƚƝƘƤ T 2 Ʀȶ ƢƘƣƜƘƩƮμƘƟơƟ] ƦȮ ƢƘƣƜƘƩƮμƘƟƔ T

101 Ǡ ƗƜƥƥƔʎƥƜƟ ƾƢƘƒƣơƜƥƜƟ : ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƝƔȴ ƢƣȶƤ ƦȮ ǏʭƔ ƝƔȴ ƗƧƦƜƝƏ. L Ts.l. r(MR) 1 lm.] ƗƜƥƥƔʎƥƜƟ ƀ: deest in TR; (ƾƢƘƒƣơƜƥƜ n.) R (lm.) ƾƢƘƒƣơƜƥƜƟ ita apud poetam L: ƾƢƘƒƣơ per compendium in lm. scholii ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ] ǢƖơƧƟ T ƝƔȴ om. T ǏʭƔ T (Lascaris): Ǔƫ Lrr post ƗƧƦƜƝƏ leguntur ƝƔȴ ȋμƚƣơƤ ȁƤ ƢƏƟƦŪ ǎƨơƣɲ in L et ƝƔȴ ȋμƚƣơƤ ȁƤ ƢƏƟƦŪ ǎƨơƣɲ ƝƔȴ ƢƏƟƦŪ ǎƢƔƝơƯƘƜ in r; vide ad sch. 102a.1–2; vide etiam ad sch. 130a post ƗƧƦƜƝƏ ita pergit T: μȱƣƚ ƟƘȹƫƟ ǢƖơƧƟ ƾƟƔƦƐƞƞƫƟ Ǡ ƗȹƟƫƟ

102a (Ȥ ƝƣƔƦƜƥƦƘƯƫƟ ƝƔƦŪ ȂμμƔ): ƝƔȴ ȋμƚƣơƤ ȁƤ ƢƏƟƦŪ ǎƨơƣɲ. L r(ƀR) 1 ȋμƚƣơƤ: Od. 11.109, 12.323 ǦƘƞȵơƧ, ȁƤ ƢȯƟƦŪ ǎƨơƣɲ ƝƔȴ ƢȯƟƦŪ ǎƢƔƝơȹƘƜ. 1–2 haec a sch. 101 separavi: post sch. 102b.1 ǾƢƦƜƝƮƟ transp. Brunck1 2 post ǎƨơƣɲ add. ƝƔȴ ƢƏƟƦŪ ǎƢƔƝơƯƘƜ r

1 lm. addidi

78

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

102b Ȥ ƝƣƔƦƜƥƦƘƯƫƟ : Ȥ ƟƜƝʬƟ ƢƏƟƦƔƤ ƦơȸƤ ƛƘơȸƤ ƝƔƦȮ Ʀȶ ǾƢƦƜƝȷƟ. L Ts.l. r(R) 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. v. 102 Ȥ ƝƣƔƦƜƥƦƘƯƫƟ – ȂμμƔ Ȥ] ǿ T ƦơȸƤ om. T

scholio praefigit ƘǮƢȰ T

103–7 (ƢƧƟƛƏƟơμƔƜ – ƢƮƛơƟ): ƢƧƟƛƏƟơμƔƜ, ƨƚƥƒ, ƦȲƟ ƾμƨƜƟƘƜƝʀ ŸƚƜƏƟƘƜƣƔƟ μƚƗƐƢơƦƘ ƦơȸƤ ǾƨƛƔƞμơȸƤ ƾƗƔƝƣƯƦơƧƤ ǒƩƘƜƟ ƾƞƞŪ ƾƘȴ Ʀʭ ƢƮƛʪ ƦʬƟ ƗƔƝƣƯƫƟ ƟƜƝƫμƐƟƚƟ ǾƗƯƣƘƥƛƔƜŭ ƾƛƞƒƔƟ ƗŪ ȂƣƟƜƟ ƦȲƟ ƾƞƝƧƮƟƔ ƨƚƥȴƟ ǡ ƦƒƝƦƘƜ ǎƟ ƦƔʎƤ ȏƨƏƞơƜƤ ƢƐƦƣƔƜƤ, ƘǴƦƔ ƦʬƟ ɜʬƟ 5 ƾƨƔƟƜƙơμƐƟƫƟ ƗƔƝƣƯƘƜ. L r(R) 1–5 haec a sch. 105a separavi (vide ad sch. 104) 1 lm. addidi 2 μƚƗȱƢơƦƘ] expectes ơȎƗƐƢơƦƘ, sed cf. sch. 352–5.7 et sch. 382b1.1; vide etiam SD II 594–5 3 ƾƛƞƒƔƟ] ǃƞƜơƟ Lascaris prob. Wolff 232 ‘prius scholium qui scripsit (i.e. 3 ƾƛƞƒƔƟ – fin.) aperte ǃƞƜơƟ legit; nam de ȏ ƨ Ə ƞ ơ Ɯ Ƥ ƢƐƦƣƔƜƤ loquitur’ ƗŪ] ƗȰ R 4 ƾƞƝƧƮƟƔ] ƾƞƝƧƮƟƚƟ R 4 post ƘǴƦƔ add. ƗȰ Wolff l.c.

103 (ƢơƛơƧμƐƟɯ): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƢơƛơƯƥɾ. Ls.l. Ts.l. cf. Eust. Il. III 74, 21 ƝƔȴ «ƢơƛơƧμȱƟɾ ƨƣƘƟȵ», Ʀʁ ƝơƜƟȷƦƘƣơƟ Ƣơƛơȹƥɾ 1 lm. add. Elmsley

104 ƦȮƟ ƾμƨƜƟƘƜƝʀ ŸƚƜƏƟƘƜƣƔƟ : ƦȲƟ ƢƘƣƜμƏƩƚƦơƟ. L r(R); cf. gl. in Ts.l. 1 ƢƘƣƜμƏƩƚƦơƟ: cf. sch. 527 ubi ƾμƨƜƟƘƒƝƚƦơƟ per ƢƘƣƜμƏƩƚƦơƤ explanatur et locum ibi allatum 1 lm. deest in R; (ƾμƨƜƟƘƜƝʀ n.) R ƦȲƟ ƢƘƣƜμȯƩƚƦơƟ ut gl. ad ƦȮƟ ƾμƨƜƟƘƜƝʀ praebet T scholia 104, 105a et 103–7 (hoc ordine) in unum composuerunt libri

79

sch. 102b – sch. 106–7b

105a (ơǵƔ): ǎƢƜƣƣƚμƔƦƜƝʬƤ. L r(R) 1 hoc vocabulum a sch. 104 separavit Dindorf (teste Papageorgiou) Papageorgiou

lm. add.

105b (ǂƛƞƜơƟ ȂƣƟƜƟ): ƖƣƏƨƘƦƔƜ ǃƞƜơƟ ȂƣƟƜƟ, ƾƞƝƧƮƟƔŭ Ǡ ƾƚƗƮƟƔ. L; cf. gll. in Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Papageorgiou Ɩƣ L 1–2 ƾƞƝƧƮƟƔ – fin.] ƾƞƝƧƮƟƔ Ǡ ƾƚƗƮƟƔ gll. ad ȂƣƟƜƟ nec plura T 1 ƾƞƝƧƮƟƔ T (coni. iam Dindorf 68): ƾƞƝƧƮƟƚƟ L 1–2 ego ( iam Pauli 51); vide Xenis

106 ơȒƢơƦŪƘȎƟƏƙƘƜƟ : ƦȶƟ ƢƮƛơƟ ƦʬƟ ƗƔƝƣƯƫƟ ƝơƜμƒƙƘƜƟ ƾƞƞŪ ǟƦƦɱƥƛƔƜ ƝƔȴ ƾƘȴ ƗƔƝƣƯƘƜƟ. L Ts.l. 1 ƝơƜμƒƙƘƜƟ: cf. Hesych. ƚ 975 ƚȒƟƔƥƔƤŭ ǎƝơƒμƜƥƔƤ 1 lm. deest in Ƈ; accuratiss. vv. 106–7 ơȒƢơƦŪ – ƢƮƛơƟ ƦȶƟ ƢƮƛơƟ ƦʬƟ ƗƔƝƣƯƫƟ om.. Ƈ

106–7a (ƾƗƔƝƣƯƦƫƟ): ƢơƞƧƗƔƝƣƯƦƫƟ. Ls.l. sch. Ant. 881 ƾƗȯƝƣƧƦơƟ] ƢơƞƧƗȯƝƣƧƦơƟ 1 lm. add. Lascaris

106–7b (ƾƗƔƝƣƯ-|ƦƫƟ ƕƞƘƨƏƣƫƟ): ƞƘƒƢƘƜ ǟ ƗƜƏ. L 1 haec iuxta v. 104 ƦȮƟ ƾμƨƜƟƘƜƝʀ scripta in L ad hoc lm. adscripsi; vide Xenis

80

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

107–8 ƾƞƞŪ | ƘȒμƟƔƥƦơƟ ƾƟƗƣƮƤ : ƾƞƞȮ Ʀȶ ƗƘʎμƔ Ʀȶ ȏƢȰƣ Ʀơʝ ƾƟƗƣȶƤ ƾƘȴ μƟƚμơƟƘƯơƧƥƔƟ ǎƟ ƦƔʎƤ ƾƟƏƟƗƣơƜƤ ƝơƒƦƔƜƤ ƦƣƯƩƘƥƛƔƜ ƝƔƦȮ ƪƧƩƑƟ. L T r(MR) 1 lm.] ƾƟƗƣȶƤ ƗƘʎμƔ ƀ: deest in TR; (ƘȒμƟƔƥƦơƟ n.) R; accuratiss. vv. 107–10 ƾƞƞŪ – ƦƣƯƩƘƥƛƔƜ 2 μƟƚμơƟƘƯơƧƥƔƟ] μƟƚμơƟƘƯƥƔƟ ƀ: μƟƚμơƟƘʝơƧƥƔƟ temptavi ƦƣƯƩƘƥƛƔƜ] ƝơƜƦƏƙƘƥƛƔƜ r

109 ǎƟƛƧμƒơƜƤ [ƘȎƟƔʎƤ]: ƦƔʎƤ μƘƣƜμƟƚƦƜƝƔʎƤ, ƦƔʎƤ ƢơƞƧƨƣơƟƦƒƥƦơƜƤ, ƾƟƔƟƗƣưƦơƜƥƜ ƗȰ ƦƔʎƤ ǎƣƑμơƜƤ Ʀơʝ ƾƟƗƣƮƤ. L Ts.l. r(R) 1 ƢơƞƧƨƣơƟƦƒƥƦơƜƤ: cf. sch. Hom. Od. 13.421 ǎƟƛȹμƜơƤ] ǒμƨƣơƟƦƜƤ, ȃ ǎƥƦƜ ƗƜȮ ƨƣơƟƦȵƗơƤ 1 lm. L decurtavit Brunck2: deest in R; (ƘȎƟƔʎƤ n.) R ƦƔʎƤ (pr.)] ǎƟ ƦƔʎƤ R ƢơƞƧƨƣơƟƦƒƥƦơƜƤ] ƢơƞƧƨƣƮƟƦơƜƤ T 2 ƾƟƔƟƗƣưƦơƜƥƜ ƗȰ om. T

112–4 Ʀȶ Ƣơƞƞȯ ƢƣȶƤ Ʀȶ ƝƯμƔƦƔ. L Ts.l. 1 verba Ʀȶ ƢơƞƞȮ omittit T quippe qui sch. supra verbum Ƣơƞƞȯ scripserit

112–3 ȣƥƦ' ƾƝƏμƔƟƦơƤ | Ǡ ƟƮƦơƧ : ȣƥƢƘƣ ƖȮƣ ǂƟ ƦƜƤ ƛƘƫƣơƒƚ ƝƧμƔƦơƧμƐƟƚƟ ƦȲƟ ƛƏƞƔƦƦƔƟ Ǡ ƟƮƦơƧ ƢƟƐơƟƦơƤ Ǡ ƕơƣƐơƧ, ƦʬƟ ƗȰ ƝƧμƏƦƫƟ ƦȮ μȰƟ ƾƢƜȷƟƦƔ ƦȮ ƗȰ ǎƢƘƣƩƮμƘƟƔ, ơȓƦƫƤ ƝƔȴ ƦȶƟ ǧƣƔƝƞƐƔ, ƝƔƛƏƢƘƣ ƦƜ ƢƐƞƔƖơƤ ƝƔƝʬƟŭ Ʀȶ μȰƟ ƖȮƣ ƢƔƣȶƟ ƞƧƢƘʎ, Ʀȶ ƗŪ ƔȎƠƮμƘƟơƟ ƾƢƮƝƘƜƦƔƜ. L 5 T r(MR) 1 lm.] ƾƝƏμƔƟƦơƤ ƀ: deest in TR; (ƾƝƏμƔƟƦơƤ n.) R; accuratiss. vv. 112–8 ƢơƞƞȮ – ƢƐƞƔƖơƤ; e verbis ƝƔƛƏƢƘƣ ƦƜ ƢƐƞƔƖơƤ ƝƔƝʬƟ scholiastam non post ƢơƞƯƢơƟơƟ, sed post ƔȒƠƘƜ incidisse apparet, i.e. ... ƔȒƠƘƜ, ƕƜƮƦơƧ ƢơƞƯƢơƟơƟ ȣƥƢƘƣ ƢƐƞƔƖơƤ žƣƑƥƜơƟ post ƖȮƣ add. ƨƚƥȴƟ T 2 ƛƏƞƔƦƦƔƟ] ƛƏƞƔƥƥƔƟ Trr ƢƟƐơƟƦơƤ] ƢƞƐơƟƦơƤ ƀ 3 ƾƢƜƮƟƦƔ ƦȮ ƗȰ (post ƗȰ add. ƘǮƥȴƟ T) ǎƢƘƣƩƮμƘƟƔ LTrr: ǎƢƜƮƟƦƔ ƦȮ ƗȰ ƾƢƘƣƩƮμƘƟƔ Papageorgiou renuente Wansink 97 ơȓƦƫƤ ƝƔȴ ƦȶƟ ǧƣƔƝƞƐƔ] scholiasta subaudit ƛƘƫƣơƒƚ ƦƜƤ ǀƟ ƝƧμƔƦơƯμƘƟơƟ ơȓƦƫƤ] ơȓƦƫ T: ơȓƦƫƤ ơȓƦƫƤ R 4 ƖȮƣ scripsi (cf. ad sch. 959–61.1): ƦơƜ r: ƦƜ cett. quod del. Papageorgiou; servandum esse putat Wansink l.c. ‘quia Ʀȶ μȰƟ ... Ʀȶ ƗȰ adverbialiter accipi potest ... et quia ƦƜ ƢƔƣȶƟ aeque bene

sch. 107–8 – sch. 117b2

81

Ʀȶ μȰƟ ƖȮƣ] scil. ƦʬƟ ƝƔƝʬƟ, cf. sch. 117b1.1–2 in ƾƢƮƝƘƜƦƔƜ desinit M scribens ǎƟƦƔʝƛƔ ƞƘƒƢơƧƥƜ ƦȮ ƥƩƮƞƜƔ, ȃƦƜ ƢƔƞƔƜȶƟ ƝƔȴ ƥƩƘƗȶƟ ƥƘƥƚƢƫμƐƟơƟ (-ƟơƟ p.c.: -ƟƫƟ a.c.) ǤƟ Ʀȶ ƕƜƕƞƒơƟ ǢƖơƧƟ Ʀȶ ƢƣơƦƮƦƧƢơƟ (Ƣƣơ- sic)

dicitur ac ƢƔƣƮƟ ƦƜŪ

116 žƔƗμơƖƘƟʀ : ƦȶƟ żƚƕƔƖƘƟʀ ǧƣƔƝƞƐƔŭ ǧƥƜƮƗơƤ ȂƨƣŪ ǧƣƔƝƞʀơƤ żƚƕƔƖƘƟƐơƤ ƝƞƐơƤ ƘDzƚ. L T 1 ǧƥƒơƗơƤ: Th. 530

117a (ƦƣƐƨƘƜ, Ʀȶ ƗŪ ƔȒƠƘƜ): ƾƟƦȴ ƦƣơƨʀƤ ƝƔƛƚμƘƣƜƟʀƤ ƝƔȴ ƔȎƠƑƥƘưƤ ƘǮƥƜƟ ƔȎƦʭ ơǯ ƢƮƟơƜ. L T r(R) 1 cf. sch. Eur. Hipp. 366 ƢȷƟơƜ (cod.: lm. accuratiss. Ȥ ƢƮƟơƜ ƦƣƐƨơƟƦƘƤ ƕƣơƦơƯƤ): ǎƟ ơǵƤ ƦƣȱƨơƟƦƔƜ ơǯ ƕƣơƦơȵ· ǎƢƘȴ ǎƟ ƢȷƟơƜƤ ƗƜƔƦƘƞơʝμƘƟ 1–2 post sch. 117b1.2 ƔȎƦơʝ haec verba leguntur in T, praemisso ƦơƧƦƐƥƦƜƟ add. Papageorgiou; (ƦƣƐƨƘƥƜ sic n.) R ƾƟƦȴ] ƾƟ. Ʀơʝ R 2 ƔȎƦʭ] ƔȎƦʬƟ R

1 lm.

117b1 ƦƣƐƨƘƜ : ƾƟƦȴ ǒƩƘƜ, Ʀȶ ƗȰ ƔȒƠƘƜ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƔȒƠƘƦƔƜ. ơȓƦƫ ƨƚƥƒŭ Ʀȶ μȰƟ ƦʬƟ ƝƔƝʬƟ ǒƩƘƜ ƔȎƦƮƟ, Ʀȶ ƗŪ ƔȒƠƘƦƔƜ ƝƔƦŪ ƔȎƦơʝ. L T r(R) 1 ǒƩƘƜ: vide locos similes ad sch. 28 allatos 1 lm.] Ǡ Ʀȶ ƦƣƐƨƘƜ T, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 117b2 iungat: deest in R; (ƕƜƮƦơƧ n.) R ǒƩƘƜ – ƾƟƦȴ om. R propter homoeoteleuton ƾƟƦȴ (pr.)] ƾƟ. Ʀơʝ T Ʀȶ ƗȰ] ƝƔȴ T ơȓƦƫ] ơȎ R Ʀȶ (alt.)] ƦƜ R 2 ƗŪ L (ƗȰ dedit Papageorgiou p. 286.13): ƗȰ T ƔȒƠƘƦƔƜ] ƔȒƠƘƜ R

117b2 ƦƣƐƨƘƜ : ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƦƣƒƕƘƜ ƝƔƦȮ ƾƟƦƒƨƣƔƥƜƟŭ ǒƥƦƜ ƖȮƣ ơȓƦƫŭ Ʀȶ μȰƟ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƝƔƦƔƢơƟƘʎ ƢƔƣƮƟ, Ʀȶ ƗŪ ƔȒƠƘƜ ƝƔȴ ƝơƣƧƨơʝƦƔƜ. Ǡ ȃƦƜ ơǮƝƘʎơƟ Ʀơʝ ǣƣƫơƤ Ʀȶ ƦƣƐƨƘƜ ƝƔȴ ƔȒƠƘƜ, ȣƥƦƘ ƦƣƐƨƘƥƛƔƜ ƔȎƦơʝ ƦȲƟ ƾƣƘƦȲƟ ƗƜȮ ƦʬƟ ƢƮƟƫƟ, ȟƤ ǶƥơƝƣƏƦƚƤ 5

ơǵƤ Ʀơʝ ƕƒơƧ ƾƣƘƦȲ ƦƚƞƜƝơʝƦơƟ ƘȎƗơƠƒƔƤ ƩƔƣƔƝƦʀƣƔ ǎƩƔƣƒƙƘƦơ. ƕƒơƧ ƗȰ ƢƐƞƔƖơƤ ƦȶƟ ƩƘƜμƔƙƮμƘƟơƟ ƕƒơƟ. L T r(R)

82

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

4 Isocr. 1, 8 ơǵƤ ǟ ƦʬƟ ƦƣȷƢƫƟ ƾƣƘƦȲ ƦƚƞƜƝơʝƦơƟ ƘȎƗơƠȵƔƤ ƩƔƣƔƝƦʀƣƔ ƦơʎƤ ǒƣƖơƜƤ ǎƢȱƕƔƞƘƟ (de sensu vide Isocr. 1, 7–8) 1–6 hoc sch. separatim collocavit post sch. 119 R: cum sch. 117b1 coniunxit L (ǂƞƞơƤ ƦƣƐƨƘƜ sic pro ǂƞƞƫƤ ƦƣƐƨƘƜ): cum sch. 116 copulavit T (ƦƣƐƨƘƜ ƗȰ) 1 lm. ƦƣƐƨƘƜ scripsi: ǂƞƞơƤ ƦƣƐƨƘƜ L (vide 1–6): ƦƣƐƨƘƜ ƗȰ T (vide 1–6): deest in R ơȓƦƫ] ơȓƦƫƤ R 2 ƔȎƦȶƟ] ƔȎƦȶ R Ǡ – fin] haec qui scripsit ƕƜƮƦơƧ ƢƐƞƔƖơƤ pro subiecto verborum ƦƣƐƨƘƜ et ƔȒƠƘƜ accepit 3 ƦƣƐƨƘƜ ƝƔȴ ƔȒƠƘƜ] ƦƣƐƨƘƜƟ ƝƔȴ ƔȒƠƘƜƟ T post ƦƣƐƨƘƥƛƔƜ add. ƝƔȴ ƔȒƠƘƥƛƔƜ T post ƾƣƘƦȲƟ add. ƝƔȴ ƔȒƠƘƥƛƔƜ R 3–4 ƗƜȮ ƦʬƟ ƢƮƟƫƟ] ƝƔƦȮ ƦȶƟ ƢƮƟơƟ R 4 ȟƤ] ƝƔȴ T 5 ƦƚƞƜƝơʝƦơƟ ƘȎƗơƠƒƔƤ] ƦƚƞƜƝơʝƦơƤ ƾƥƘƕƘƒƔƤ R 6 post ƕƒơƟ add. ƞƐƖƘƜ T

118–9 ƢƐƞƔƖơƤ [ƗȰ] žƣƑƥƜơƟ : ȟƤ ƢƏƟƧ ƩƘƜμƔƙơμƐƟƚƤ ƦʀƤ ƢƘƣȴ žƣƑƦƚƟ ƛƔƞƏƥƥƚƤ. L Ts.l. r(R) cf. Horat. Od. I 26, 1 sqq. 1–2 hoc sch. separatim posuerunt LT: cum sch. 117b1 coniunxit R (ƢƐƞƔƖơƤ ƗȰ žƣƑƥƜơƟ) 1 lm. ex R ƗȰ deleto: deest in cett.

119 ƾƞƞƏ ƦƜƤ ƛƘʬƟ : ƛƏƣƣƘƜ, ƨƚƥƒƟ, Ȥ ŸƚƜƏƟƘƜƣƔŭ ƛƘʬƟ ƖƏƣ ƦƜƤ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƾƟƔμƏƣƦƚƦơƟ ƝƔȴ ƗƒƝƔƜơƟ ȂƟƦƔ ƝƫƞƯƘƜ ƾƢȶ Ʀơʝ ɉƗơƧŭ Ǡ ƾƟƔμƢƞƏƝƚƦơƟ ǎƢƜƦƧƩʀ ƢƔƣȮ Ʀȶ μȲ ƾμƢƞƔƝƘʎƟ, ơǵơƟ ƝƫƞƯƘƜ ƔȎƦȶƟ μȲ ǎƢƜƦƧƩƘʎƟ Ʀơʝ NjƜƗơƧ. L Ts.l. r(R) 3 ǎƢƜƦƧƩʀ: cf. sch. 120; sch. OT. 472 ƝʀƣƘƤ ƾƟƔƢƞȯƝƚƦơƜ: Ɣǯ ƘǮƤ μƚƗȰƟ ƿμƔƣƦȯƟơƧƥƔƜ ƾƞƞȮ ƢȯƟƦƫƟ ƝƣƔƦơʝƥƔƜ = Su. Ɣ 2020 1 lm. deest in TR; accuratiss. vv. 119–21 ƾƞƞƏ – ǎƣƯƝƘƜ (grammaticum sinceram lectionem ƾƟƔμƢƞƏƝƚƦơƟ pro ƾμƢƞƏƝƚƦơƟ cognovisse viderunt Ellendt s.v. ƾƟƔμƢƞƏƝƚƦơƤ et Dindorf2 241; (ƾƞƞƏ ƦƜƤ n.) R ƛƏƣƣƘƜ] ƛƏƣƥƘƜ TR ƨƚƥƒƟ om. T ƛƘʬƟ – ƔȎƦȶƟ om. Ƈ 2 ante ƾƟƔμƏƣƦƚƦơƟ add. ǢƖơƧƟ T ƝƫƞƯƘƜ] ƝƫƞƯƥƘƜ Ƈ Ǡ ƾƟƔμƢƞƏƝƚƦơƟ – fin. om. T ƾƟƔμƢƞƏƝƚƦơƟ Lp.c.R: ƾƟƔƢƞƏƝƚƦơƟ La.c. 3 ǎƢƜƦƧƩʀ Lascaris: ǎƢƜƦƯƩƚƜ L: ǎƢƜƦƧƩƮƟƦƔ R ƾμƢƞƔƝƘʎƟ Neue 530 et Ellendt l.c.: ƾƟƔƢƞƔƝƘʎƟ L μȲ (alt.) om. R

sch. 117b2 – sch. 122–3a

83

120 (ƾƟƔμƢƞƏƝƚƦơƟ): ǂƢƦƔƜƥƦơƟ. L 1 vide locos similes ad sch. pr. allatos 1 lm. add. Papageorgiou; (ƾμƢƞƏƝƚƦơƟ s.) L

122 ȥƟ ǎƢƜμƘμƨơμƐƟƔ ƥŪ : ƢƘƣȴ ȥƟ μƘμƨơμƐƟƚ ƥƘ, ȃƦƜ ƢƣơƥƚƝƮƟƦƫƤ ǾƗƯƣɾ. ƛƘơȴ ƖȮƣ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƥʫƙơƧƥƜƟ. L; cf. sch. reformatum in T r(R) 1 ƢƘƣȴ ȥƟ: cf. sch. Hom. Il. 1.93–5 ȃƦƜ ǎƞƞƘȵƢƘƜ ǟ ƢƘƣȵ ƝƔȴ ƢƘƣƜƥƥȶƟ (ƢƘƣƜƥƥƮƟ in crucibus inclusit Erbse) Ʀȶ ǎƢƜμȱμƨƘƦƔƜ. 1–2 sch. 122 et 122–3a et b in unum composuit et ita retractavit T: ƢƘƣȴ ƗȰ ȥƟ, ƨƚƥȵ, μƘμƨơμȱƟƚ ƦƧƖƩȯƟƘƜƤ, ǟƗȱƔ μȰƟ ơDzƥƫ ƥơƜ ǎƟƔƟƦȵƔ Ɨȱŭ ƥȸ μȰƟ ƖȮƣ ȟƤ ƾƢơƛƔƟȷƟƦƔ ǎƝƘʎƟơƟ ǾƗȹƣɾ, ǎƖȺ Ɨȱ ƨƚμƜ μȲ ƩƣʀƟƔƜ ƾƢơƕȯƞƞƘƜƟ ƦȲƟ ƾƖƔƛȲƟ ǎƞƢȵƗƔŭ ơǯ ƖȮƣ ƛƘơȴ ƥʫƙơƧƥƜƟ ƔȎƦȷƟ. 1 lm. scripsit Wolff 49: ȥƟ ǎƢƜμƘμƨơμƐƟƔƤ L: deest in TR; (ǎƢƜμƘμƨơμƐƟƔƤ n.) R μƘμƨơμƐƟƚ ƥƘ Wolff l.c. (nisi quod pro ƥƘ scripsit ƥŪ): μƘμƨơμƐƟƚƤ LR: μƘμƨơμƐƟƚ ƥơƜ Lascaris post ȃƦƜ add. ơȎ Lascaris, μȲ Wolff l.c. 1–2 – ǾƗƯƣɾ] haec in incisis includenda sunt, ut appositionem ad ȥƟ (1) efficiant 2 ƥʫƙơƧƥƜƟ] ƔȒƠơƧƥƜƟ R

122–3a [ƿ-|ƗƘʎƔ μȰƟ] ƾƟƦƒƔ ƗŪ ơDzƥƫ : ơǵƤ ƢƘƣȴ Ʀơʝ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ ƨƣơƟƘʎƤ ǎƣʬŭ Ʀȶ ƗȰ ǏƠʀƤ ǎƢƏƖƘƜ, ȣƥƦƘ μȲ ƩƣʀƟƔƜ ƔȎƦȲƟ ƾƢơƕƏƞƞƘƜƟ ƦȲƟ ƾƖƔƛȲƟ ǎƞƢƒƗƔ ƢƘƣȴ ƔȎƦơʝ. L r(R); cf. sch. retractatum in T 1–3 de T vide ad sch. 122.1–2 1 lm. L decurtavi; pars Ʀȶ ƗȰ ǏƠʀƤ (2) – fin. ad vv. 126–40 ƾƟƏƞƖƚƦƔ – ƘǴƗƘƟ; spectat ơǵƤ] ơdzƥƢƘƣ R post ƨƣơƟƘʎƤ add. ǎƟƔƟƦƒƔ Bernardakis 59, at facile ƾƟƦƒƔ ex lemmate subauditur 2 ǎƣʬŭ Ʀȶ sic scripsit et interpunxit Papageorgiou: ǒƣƫƦƜ LR (in L positum est in margine ab eadem manu ƙƦ i.e. ƙƑƦƘƜ) ƦȲƟ ƾƖƔƛȲƟ] ƦʬƟ ƾƖƔƛʬƟ R

84

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

122–33b ǟƗƐƔ ȃƦƜ ƨƚƥȴƟ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƙʀƟ, ƾƟƦƒƔ ƗȰ ȃƦƜ Ʀȶ ǎƟƔƟƦƒơƟ ƟơμƒƙƘƜ ŸƚƜƏƟƘƜƣƔ ȟƤ ƾƢơƛƔƟƮƟƦơƤ ƔȎƦơʝ. L r(R); cf. sch. reformatum in T 1–2 haec a sch. pr. segregavi; de T vide ad sch. 122.1–2 Papageorgiou

1 ǟƗƐƔ T: ǟ ƗȰ LR: ǟƗƘʎƔ

123a (ƾƟƦƒƔ): ƾƟƦƒơƟ ƥơƒ. L 1 lm. add. Elmsley

123b (ơDzƥƫ): ƾƟƦȴ ƞƐƠƫ. L 1 lm. add. Elmsley

124 ơȎƝ ƾƢơƦƣƯƘƜƟ : ơȎƝ ƾƢơƖƟʬƟƔƜ, ơȎƝ ƾƢơƝƏμƟƘƜƟ, ơȎƝ ƾƢơƕƏƞƞƘƜƟ, ơȎƝ ƾƢơƗơƝƜμƏƙƘƜƟ. L; cf. gll. in Ts.l. 1–2 ơȎƝ ƾƢơƖƟ. – fin.] ƾƢơƕƏƞƞƘƜƟ, ƾƢơƗơƝƜμƏƙƘƜƟ gll. ad ƾƢơƦƣƯƘƜƟ nec plura T fortasse diversa hic exstant scholia; nam verba ơȎƝ ƾƢơƖƟʬƟƔƜ, ơȎƝ ƾƢơƝƏμƟƘƜƟ ad ơȎƝ ƾƢơƦƣƯƘƜƟ ǎƞƢƒƗƔ ƦȮƟ ƾƖƔƛƏƟ pertinent, sed reliqua, i.e. ơȎƝ ƾƢơƕƏƞƞƘƜƟ, ơȎƝ ƾƢơƗơƝƜμƏƙƘƜƟ solum ƾƢơƦƣƯƘƜƟ explicant (cf. gll. in T)

126–7 ƾƟƏƞƖƚƦƔ ƖȮƣ ơȎƗŪ | ǿ ƢƏƟƦƔ ƝƣƔƒƟƫƟ : ơȎƗȰ ƖȮƣ ǂƞƧƢƔ ƦơʎƤ ƾƟƛƣȻƢơƜƤ ǿ źƘȸƤ ƦȮ ƢƣƏƖμƔƦƔ ƢƘƢơƒƚƝƘŭ ƗơƜơȴ ƖƏƣ ƦƘ ƢƒƛơƜ. L T r(R) 3 Hom. Il. 24. 527–8 ƗơƜơȴ ƖƏƣ ƦƘ ƢƒƛơƜ ƝƔƦƔƝƘƒƔƦƔƜ ǎƟ ŸƜȶƤ ơȒƗƘƜ | ƗưƣƫƟ ơǵƔ ƗƒƗƫƥƜ, ƝƔƝʬƟ, ǓƦƘƣơƤ ƗȰ ǎƏƫƟ. 1 lm. deest in TR; (ƾƟƏƞƖƚƦƔ n.) R; accuratiss. vv. 126–31 ƾƟƏƞƖƚƦƔ – ƝƐƞƘƧƛơƜ ơȎƗȰ] ơȎ R 2 ǿ źƘȸƤ] ǿ ƛƘȶƤ T ƦȮ ƢƣƏƖμƔƦƔ post ƢƘƢơƒƚƝƘ transp. T 3 locum Homericum om. T

85

sch. 122–3b – sch. 130b

129–31 (ƾƞƞŪ – ƝƘƞƘƯƛơƧƤ): ơǵơƟ ƥƧμμƜƖƟƯơƧƥƜƟ ơǯ ƛƘơȴ ƦȮ ƢƣƏƖμƔƦƔ ƦơʎƤ ƾƟƛƣưƢơƜƤ ƢƑμƔƦƜ ƝƔȴ ƩƔƣɲ ƝƔȴ ƥƦƣƐƨơƧƥƜƟ ǾƠƐƫƤ ƦȮ ƢƣƏƖμƔƦƔ ȣƥƢƘƣ ƦȮƤ ƦʀƤ ǂƣƝƦơƧ ƥƦƣơƨƏƤ. L T r(R) 1–3 haec a sch. pr. separavi 1 lm. addidi (scholiastam legisse ƥƦƣơƨƏƗƔƤ ƝƘƞƘƯƛơƧƤ pro ƥƦƣơƨƏƗƘƤ ƝƐƞƘƧƛơƜ conicias; cf. ad sch. 130b) ơǵơƟ] ƾƞƞȮ T 2 ante ƢȳμƔƦƜ add. ǎƟ T ƥƦƣƐƨơƧƥƜƟ] ƦƣƐƨơƧƥƜƟ R ƦȮ ƢƣƏƖμƔƦƔ] ƔȎƦȮ T 3 ƦȮƤ ƦʀƤ om. T ƥƦƣơƨƏƤ] ƦƣơƨȮƤ R

129a ƾƞƞŪ ǎƢȴ ƢƑμɯ ƝƔȴ ƩƔƣɲ : ǎƢȴ ƩƔƣɲ ƗȰ ƝƔȴ ƢƑμƔƦƜ ƢɱƥƜ ƝƧƝƞơʝƥƜƟ ơǯ ƛƘơȵŭ ƢƑμɯ ƗȰ ƾƟƦȴ ƢƑμƔƦƜ ƝƔƦȮ ƾƢơƝơƢƑƟ. L 1 (lm.) ƢƑμɯ scripsi (ita verbum poetae ƄŻƀŵ interpretatum esse commentatorem patet) post Wolff 132 ‘dativum scholiasta … habuit’: ƢƑμƔƦƜ L 2 ƢƑμɯ Papageorgiou: ƢʀμƔ L

129b (ǎƢȴ ƢƑμɯ ƝƔȴ ƩƔƣɲ ): ƢơƦȰ μȰƟ ǎƢȴ ƢƑμƔƦƜ ƢơƦȰ ƗȰ ǎƢȴ ƩƔƣɲ. L 1 lm. addidi

130a ƢɱƥƜ ƝƧƝƞơʝƥƜƟ : ƾƟƦȴ ƝƧƝƞơʝƦƔƜ ƦȮ ƦʬƟ ƾƟƛƣưƢƫƟ ƢƣƏƖμƔƦƔ. L r(MR) 1 hoc sch. post sch. 101 collocavit r lm.] ǂƝƣơƜ (sic pro NJƣƝƦơƧ) ƥƦƣơƨƏƗƘƤ r ƾƟ. Ʀơʝ r ƝƧƝƞơʝƦƔƜ L (ƝƧƝƞơʝƟƦƔƜ scripsit Papageorgiou): ƝƧƝƞơʝƟƦƔƜ r

ƾƟƦȴ]

130b [Ǡ] Ʀȶ ƝƧƝƞơʝƥƜƟ ǎƢȴ ƦʬƟ ƛƘʬƟ. L r(MR) 1 cf. sch. 129a 1 haec a sch. pr. segregavi; nam scholia diversis a grammaticis profecta esse perspicuum est; alter (sch. a) ƥƦƣơƨƏƗƘƤ ƝƐƞƘƧƛơƜ apud poetam legit, alter (sch. b) ƥƦƣơƨƏƗƔƤ ƝƘƞƘƯƛơƧƤ (cf. ad sch. 129–31.1) Ǡ delevi

86

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

130–1 ơǵơƟ ǂƣ-|ƝƦơƧ ƥƦƣơƨƏƗƘƤ : ƦȮƤ ǂƣƝƦơƧƤ ƢƔƣƐƞƔƕƘƟ, ǎƢƘȴ ƗƜƔƨƔƟƘʎƤ ƦƐ ƘǮƥƜƟ ƝƔȴ ǟƥƧƩƔƜƦƐƣƔƟ ƢơƜơʝƟƦƔƜ ƦȲƟ ƝƒƟƚƥƜƟŭ ƝƔƛƮƞơƧ ƖȮƣ ǾƠƯƦƘƣơƟ ƦȮ ƟƮƦƜƔ ƝƜƟơʝƟƦƔƜ ƗƜȮ Ʀȶ μƘƒƙơƟƔ ƝƯƝƞơƟ ǿƗƘƯƘƜƟŭ NJƣƔƦơƤ 5 ƔȎƦơʝ ƝƔȴ žƣƜơʎơ ƛơưƦƔƦƔƒ ƘǮƥƜ ƝƐƞƘƧƛơƜ. L T 4 Arat. Phaenom. 225–7 ƔȎƦơʝ ƝƔȴ žƣƜơʎơ ƛơưƦƔƦơƒ ƘǮƥƜ ƝƐƞƘƧƛơƜ | ȃƤ ʜƏ ƦƘ ƝƔȴ μƑƝƜƥƦƔ ƗƜƫƝƮμƘƟơƤ ƢƐƣƜ ƝƯƝƞƔ | ơȎƗȰƟ ƾƨƔƧƣƮƦƘƣơƟ ƦƣơƩƏƘƜ žƧƟơƥơƧƣƒƗơƤ NJƣƝƦơƧ 1 lm.] deest in T, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 126–7 conectat (ƦȮƤ ǂƣƝƦơƧƤ ƗȰ); accuratiss. vv. 130–1 ơǵơƟ – ƝƐƞƘƧƛơƜ ƦȮƤ ǂƣƝƦơƧƤ] ƦȮƤ ǂƣƝƦơƧ ƥƦƣơƨȮƤ Lascaris 2 loco ǟƥƧƩƔƜƦƐƣƔƟ – fin. praebet ƢơƦȰ μȰƟ ǂƟƫ ƢơƦȰ ƗȰ ƝȯƦƫ ǏƝȯƥƦƚ ƥƦƣȱƨƘƦƔƜ T

136a1 (ƥƦƐƣƘƥƛƔƜ): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƞƧƢƘʎƥƛƔƜ ƝƔȴ ƥƦƐƣƘƥƛƔƜ ƩƔƣɱƤ. L r(R) 1 lm. add. Lascaris; (ƝƐƞƘƧƛơƜ n.) R ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ om. R

136a2 (ƥƦƐƣƘƥƛƔƜ): ƦƒƟơƤ [ƗȰ] ƥƦƐƣƘƥƛƔƜ; ƗʀƞơƟ ȃƦƜ Ʀơʝ ƩƔƒƣƘƜƟ. L r(R) 1 haec a sch. pr. separavi

lm. addidi ƗȰ delevi ƗʀƞơƟ ȃƦƜ] ƗƚƞơƟƮƦƜ R

137 ǁ ƝƔȴ ƥȰ ƦȮƟ ǂƟƔƥƥƔƟ : ǃƢƘƣ ƝƔȴ ƥȰ ƞƐƖƫ ƩƣʀƟƔƜ ƨƣơƟƘʎƟ ƝƔȴ ƩƣƚƥƦƔʎƤ ǎƞƢƒƥƜ ƕƮƥƝƘƥƛƔƜ. Ǡ ơȓƦƫƤŭ ǁ ƝƔȴ ƥȰ ƕơƯƞơμƔƜ ƨƣơƟƦƒƙƘƜƟ ȃƦƜ ƦƣƐƢơƟƦƔƜ ƝƔȴ ǎƝ ƝƔƝʬƟ ǎƢȴ ƾƖƔƛȮ ƦȮ ƾƟƛƣưƢƜƟƔ. L T r(R) 1 lm. deest in TR; accuratiss. vv. 137–8 ǁ ƝƔȴ ƥȰ – DzƥƩƘƜƟ ƩƣʀƟƔƜ om. R post ƨƣơƟƘʎƟ add. ƝƔȴ ƥƦƐƣƘƥƛƔƜ ƩƔƣɱƤ R 2 ƝƔȴ om. T post ƕơƯƞơμƔƜ transp. ƥȰ Ƈ 3 ǎƝ] ǎƢȴ R ǎƢȴ om. R ƾƖƔƛȮ] ƦȮ ƾƖ. ƇR

140 (ƦƐƝƟơƜƥƜ) źʀƟŪ ǂƕơƧƞơƟ : ƗƯƥƕơƧƞơƟ ƝƔȴ ƝƔƝƮƕơƧƞơƟ, μȲ ƕơƧƞƘƧƮμƘƟơƟ ƦơʎƤ ǮƗƒơƜƤ ƢƔƜƥȴ Ʀȶ ƥƧμƨƐƣơƟ. ƗƜȶ μƚƗȰƟ ƨƔʝƞơƟ ƢƘƣȴ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ ǒƞƢƜƙƘŭ ơȎ ƖȮƣ ƢƔƣơƣɲ ƦȶƟ ǏƔƧƦơʝ ƢƔʎƗƔ ǿ źƘƯƤ. L T r(R)

sch. 130–1 – sch. 144–7

87

1 ƝƔƝƮƕơƧƞơƟ: cf. sch. El. 546 (ƾƕơȹƞơƧ): ƝƔƝơƕơȹƞơƧ; sch. Thuc. I 120, 5 ƾƕơƧƞơƦƐƣƫƟ: ƝƔƝơƕơƧƞơƦƐƣƫƟ 1 lm. L supplevi: deest in R et T quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. pr. conectat (ơȎƗƘȴƤ ƖƏƣ, vide notam proximam); (ƦƐƝƟơƜƥƜ n.) R ƗƯƥƕơƧƞơƟ – ƝƔƝƮƕơƧƞơƟ] haec rescripsit T: ơȎƗƘȴƤ ƖȮƣ ơǴƗƘ ƦƜƟȮ ƙʀƟ ǂƕơƧƞơƟ ơȓƦƫ ƦơʎƤ ƦȱƝƟơƜƤ ƔȎƦơʝ (retractatio lectionis varietate ƙʀƟ et ơǴƗƘƟ quae in T invenitur innixa est) ante μȲ add. ǢƖơƧƟ T 2 post ƥƧμƨƐƣơƟ add. ƞƐƠƫ R 3 ƢƔƣơƣɲ ƦȶƟ ... ƢƔʎƗƔ T (contuli etiam sch. Eur. Or. 4 ƦơȸƤ ǮƗȵơƧƤ ǎƝƖȷƟơƧƤ ... ƢƔƣơƣɲ): ƢƔƣơƣɲ Ʀơʝ ... ƢƔƜƗȶƤ LR (ƔȎƦơʝ pro ǏƔƧƦơʝ praebet R): ȏƢƘƣơƣɲ Ʀơʝ ... ƢƔƜƗȶƤ Bernardakis 59

141–2 (ƢƘƢƧƥμƐƟƚ – ƢƏƛƚμƔ ƦơȎμƮƟ): ǎƠ ƾƝơʀƤ ǎƞƑƞƧƛƔƤ, ƦʬƟ ǎμʬƟ ƔǮƥƛơμƐƟƚ ƝƔƝʬƟ. L Ts.l. r(R) 1 lm. addidi

144 Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ ƟƘƏƙơƟ ǎƟ ƦơƜơʎƥƗƘ : ǟ ƖȮƣ ƟƐƔ ǟƞƜƝƒƔ ǎƟ ƦơʎƤ ƦƮƢơƜƤ ƦʀƤ ƾμƘƣƜμƟƒƔƤ ƕƮƥƝƘƦƔƜ. Ʀȶ ƗŪ ƔȎƦơʝ ƦƜƟȰƤ ƪƜƞơʝƥƜƟ ƝƔȴ ƟơơʝƥƜƟ ƔȎƦƮƛƜ, ǒƟƜơƜ ƗȰ ƗƔƥƯƟơƧƥƜƟ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǏƔƧƦơʝ. L T r(R) 2 ƔȎƦƮƛƜ: cf. sch. Eur. Hec. 401 (ad lm. ƔȎƦơʝ) ƔȎƦƮƛƜ…; sch. D Hom. Il. 1.428 … «ƔȎƦơʝ» ƗȰ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƔȎƦƮƛƜ, ǎƢȴ ƦȶƟ ƦƮƢơƟ; Hesych. Ɣ 8477; Phot. Ɣ 3258 1 lm. deest in TR; (ƟƘƏƙơƟ n.) R; accuratiss. 144–5 Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ – ƔƧƦơʝ; ǟƞƜƝƒƔ] ǟ Ɵ. ƨƚƥȴƟ ǟƞ. T 2 ƔȎƦƮƛƜ] Ʀȶ ƔȎƦ. T

ǟ ƖȮƣ ƟƐƔ

144–7 (Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ – ƕƒơƟ): ƦơʎƤ ǮƗƒơƜƤ ǏƔƧƦơʝ ƦƮƢơƜƤ ƾμƘƣƒμƟƫƤ ƕƮƥƝƘƦƔƜ Ʀȶ ƟƘƏƙơƟ ƝƔȴ ơȒƦƘ ƝƔƯμƔƦƜ ƨƛƘƒƣƘƦƔƜ ơȒƦƘ ȏƘƦʭ ơȒƦƘ ƾƟƐμƫƟ ƥƨơƗƣƮƦƚƦƜ, ƾƞƞȮ ƦƔʎƤ ǟƗơƟƔʎƤ ƘǮƤ ȓƪơƤ ƘȎƛƧμƒƔƤ ƔDzƣƘƦƔƜ. L T r(R) 2 ƝƔƯμƔƦƜ: cf. sch. Ant. 1086 … ƛƏƞƢơƤ ƖȮƣ Ʀȶ ƝƔʝμƔ; sch. Aesch. Th. 431b ƛƏƞƢƘƥƜ] ƝƔƯμƔƥƜ; ibid. 446b; Hesych. ƛ 58 ƛƏƞƢơƤŭ ƝƔʝμƔ… 1–3 haec a sch. pr. seiunxi 1 lm. addidi ante ƦơʎƤ ǮƗƒơƜƤ add. ǢƖơƧƟ T 2 ƝƔƯμƔƦƜ LTRp.c.: ƥưμƔƦƜ Ra.c. 3 ƘȎƛƧμƒƔƤ] ǎƟƛƧμƒƔƤ R post ƘȎƛƧμƒƔƤ add. ǒƣƩƘƦƔƜ ƝƔȴ T

88

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

144–9 (Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ – Ɲƞƚƛʁ ): ǓƫƤ ƦƜƤ ƖƔμƚƛʁ ơȎƗƐƟ, ƨƚƥƒ, ƦƔƣƏƦƦƘƜ ƦȲƟ ƟƐƔƟ ǟƞƜƝƒƔƟ, ƾƞƞŪ ȟƤ ƦƘʎƩơƤ ƾƣƣƔƖȰƤ ơȎ ƨƛƘƒƣƘƦƔƜ ȏƢƮ ƦƜƟơƤ, ơȓƦƫƤ ơȎƗȰ ǟ ƟƘƮƦƚƤ ǎƥƦƚƣƜƖμƐƟƚ ȏƢȶ ƾμƘƣƜμƟƒƔƤ ƦʬƟ ǎƟ ƕƒʪ ƝƔƝʬƟŭ ƟƐƔ ƖȮƣ ƨƣơƟƦȴƤ ơȎƝ ƾƞƖƘʎƟ ƨƜƞƘʎ. L r(R); cf. gl. in T 4 Eur. Med. 48 1–4 haec a sch. pr. segregavi 1 lm. addidi ǓƫƤ] expectes ǓƫƤ ǂƟ, sed cf. sch. 630.2, sch. Ai. 578, sch. OC 48 et vide LSJ s.v. ǓƫƤ A.I.2 ƦƔƣƏƦƦƘƜ om. R 2 ƾƞƞŪ ȟƤ] ǂƞƞƫƤ R ƦƘʎƩơƤ om. R ƨƛƘƒƣƘƦƔƜ] ƨƛƒƟƘƦƔƜ R ơȓƦƫƤ om. R 3 ǎƥƦƚƣƜƖμƐƟƚ ȏƢȶ] ǎƥƦȴ ƗȰ ȏƢȰƣ R 4 ƟƐƔ – ƨƜƞƘʎ] haec supra v. 147 textus poetici scripsit T

145–6 (ơȎ ƛƏƞƢơƤ – ơȎƗȰƟ): ƾƟƦȴ ơȎƗƘμƒƔ μƘƦƔƕơƞƑ. L Ts.l.Tas.l. 1 lm. addidi

2 ƾƟƦȴ] ƝƔʝμƔ ǢƖơƧƟ T

147 (ǟƗơƟƔʎƤ … ǎƠƔƒƣƘƜ): ƦƔʎƤ ƘȎƛƧμƒƔƜƤ ǎƠƧƪơʎ. L 1 lm. addidi

150 ǟ ƢƣȶƤ ƾƟƦȴ ƦʀƤ ȏƢƐƣ. Ls.l. Ts.l 1 ǟ ƢƣȶƤ om. T

151 Ʀȶ ƔȎƦơʝ ȟƤ ƢƣȶƤ Ʀȶ ƟƐơƟ ƾƢơƗƐƗƫƝƘƟ. L 1 Ʀȶ ƟƐơƟ coni. Neue 532, cf. v. 144 Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ ƟƘƏƙơƟ: ƦȶƟ ƟƐơƟ L

151–2 ƦƮƦŪ – ƕƔƣƯƟơμƔƜ : Ʀȶ ƦƚƟƜƝƔʝƦƔ, ǎƢƘƜƗȮƟ ƖƔμƚƛƘƒƚ ƦƜƤ, ƘǮƤ ƦȮ ƝƔƛŪ ǏƔƧƦȲƟ ƾƢơƕƞƐƢơƧƥƔ ƝƔȴ ƥƧƟơƣʬƥƔ ǒƠƫ ƦʀƤ ƾμƘƣƜμƟƒƔƤ ƘǮƤ ƨƣơƟƦƒƗƔƤ ƘǮƥʀƞƛƘƟ, ơǮƝƦƘƣƘʎ ƦȮ ƝƔƦŪ ǎμƐ. L T r(R)

sch. 144–9 – sch. 160–3

89

1–3 haec huc retraxi: ad v. 148 rettulerunt codd. 1 lm. scripsi: ǎƤ ƦơʝƛŪ, ǓƫƤ ƦƜƤ ƾƟƦȴ ƢƔƣƛƐƟơƧ (v. 148) L: ǓƫƤ ǂƟ ƦƜƤ ƾƟƦȴ ƢƔƣƛƐƟơƧ Ɲƞƚƛʁ ƖƧƟȲ tamquam partem scholii praebet T, quippe qui hoc sch. scholio 144–7.3 ƔDzƣƘƦƔƜ continuet: deest in R; (ǓƫƤ ƦƜƤ n.) R Ʀȶ ƦƚƟƜƝƔʝƦƔ] ƦƚƟƜƝƔʝƦƔ ƖȮƣ T, vide notam praecedentem ƖƔμƚƛƘƒƚ] ƖƔμƚƛʁ TR, idque recepit Brunck1 prob. Kruytbosch 43, sed cf. sch. 824.1 ǎƢƘƜƗȮƟ ǎƟƜƔƧƦȶƤ ƢƔƣȱƞƛơƜ, cf. SD II 338 2 ǏƔƧƦȲƟ] ǏƔƧƦȮ R ƾƢơƕƞƐƢơƧƥƔ ƝƔȴ ƥƧƟơƣʬƥƔ] ƾƢơƕƞƐƢƘƜ ƝƔȴ ƠƧƟơƣɲ T ȟƤ add. Papageorgiou prob. Kruytbosch l.c. ǒƠƫ – 3 ƘǮƥʀƞƛƘƟ] haec ita reformavit T: ƝƔȴ ȏƢȰƣ Ʀơʝ ƾƟƗƣȶƤ ƔȎƦʀƤ ƝƔȴ ƦʬƟ ƦȱƝƟƫƟ ƨƣơƟƦȵƙƘƜ 3 ƨƣơƟƦƒƗƔƤ] ƨƣơƟƦƒƗƔ R ơǮƝƦƘƣƘʎ Kruytbosch 44: ơǮƝƦƘƒƣƘƜ L: ơǮƝƦƘʎƣƔƜ R ơǮƝƦƘƣƘʎ – fin. om. T ƦȮ] Ʀȶ R

153 ƢƏƛƚ μȰƟ ơȔƟ ƗȲ ƢƮƞƞŪ ǒƖƫƖƘ : ƦȮ μȰƟ ǂƞƞƔ ƢƏƛƚ Ʀơʝ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ ƢơƞƞƏƝƜƤ ƾƢƫƗƧƣƏμƚƟ, ǑƟ ƗȰ ƟʝƟ ƘǮƢƘʎƟ ƕơƯƞơμƔƜ ơǵơƟ ơȎƝ ƘDzƣƚƝƏ Ƣƫ. L r(R); cf. gll. in Ts.l. 1 lm. deest in R; (ƢƏƛƚ μȰƟ n.) R; accuratiss. vv. 153–4 ƢƏƛƚ – ǎƠƘƣʬ 1 ƦȮ μȰƟ – fin.] ǂƞƞƔ ƢƏƛƚ Ʀơʝ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ gl. ad v. 153 et ƘDzƣƚƝƔ ƗƚƞơƟƮƦƜ gl. ad ơȒƢƫ nec plura T 2 Ƣƫ] ƢơƧ R

157 (ƢƔƞƔƜȮƟ ƗƐƞƦơƟ): ȃƦƜ Ƣƣȶ Ƣơƞƞơʝ ƩƣƮƟơƧ ƩƣƚƥμȶƤ ǤƟ ƔȎƦʭ ƗƘƗơμƐƟơƤ. L Ts.l. r(R) 1–2 sch. ad v. 157 adscripsit T: iuxta v. 155 legitur in L; (ǤμơƤ n.= v. 155) R 1 lm. add. Brunck1 ope libri T ȃƦƜ] ơǵơƟ R: om. T post Ƣơƞƞơʝ add. ƖȮƣ T ƩƣƚƥμȶƤ] ǿ Ʃƣ. T 2 post ƗƘƗơμƐƟơƤ add. ǿ ƢƘƣȴ ƦơȹƦơƧ T

160–3 ƾƞƞŪ ȣƤ ƦƜ – ƟƐμơƜ : ƾƘȴ μȰƟ ǎƠɿƘƜ ȟƤ ǎƢȴ ǿμơƞơƖơƧμƐƟʪ ƝƔƦơƣƛưμƔƦƜ, ƟʝƟ ƗȰ ȟƤ ƦƘƛƟƚƠƮμƘƟơƤ ǎƟƘƦƘƒƞƔƦƮ μơƜ dzƟƔ ƢƣƮƟơƜƔƟ ǂƞƞơƧ ƾƟƗƣȶƤ ǎμƔƧƦʁ ƢơƜƑƥƫμƔƜ, ƘǴƢƘ ƗȰ ƝƔȴ ƢƘƣȴ ƦʀƤ ǏƝƏƥƦơƧ ƦʬƟ ƦƐƝƟƫƟ μƘƣƒƗơƤ. L T r(R) 1 lm. scripsi: ƟʝƟ ƗŪ ȟƤ ǒƦŪ ơȎƝ ȢƟ (v. 161) L: deest in TR; (ƟʝƟ ƗŪ ȟƤ n.) R ǎƠɿƘƜ] ǎƠƑƣƩƘƦơ T et post hoc add. ƨƚƥȴƟ T 2 ǎƟƘƦƘƒƞƔƦƮ μơƜ dzƟƔ] scholiastam ƃƇŽ apud poetam pro coniunctione ȃƦƜ accepisse, non pro pronomine ȃ ƦƜ, ex dzƟƔ collegit Wolff 216 ƢƣȷƟơƜƔƟ T (Lascaris): ƢƣơƟơƒɯ LR 3 ƾƟƗƣȶƤ] i.e. ƞƐƩơƧƤ apud poetam hoc

90 sensu accepit scholiasta ƢƔƒƗƫƟ T

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

ƢơƜƑƥƫμƔƜ TR Lp (Lascaris): ƢơƜƑƥơμƔƜ L

4 ƦƐƝƟƫƟ]

161–2a1 ƘǴƢƘ μȰƟ ƞƐƩơƧƤ – ƝƦʀƥƜƟ : ǒƞƘƖƘƟ ƢƣơƥƑƝƘƜƟ ǎμȰ ƞƔƕƘʎƟ ƦȲƟ ƢƣơʎƝƔ ƝƔȴ ƦȮ ƗʬƣƔ ǁ ȏƢȰƣ Ʀơʝ ƞƐƩơƧƤ ǎƝƦƚƥƏμƚƟ. L r(R) 1 lm. scripsi: ƩƣƘʎŪ ɒ μƐƞƘƥƛƔƜ ƝƦʀƥƜƟ L: deest in R pro coniunctione accepit ƢƣơƥƑƝƘƜƟ] ƢƣơƥƑƝƘƜ R

grammaticus ƃƇŽ apud poetam

161–2a2 (ƞƐƩơƧƤ ȃƦƜ ƩƣƘƒƚ μŪ ǏƞƐƥƛƔƜ ƝƦʀƥƜƟ): Ǡ ƢƣơƟơƘʎƥƛƔƜ ǏƦƐƣơƧ ƾƟƗƣȶƤ Ǡ ƥʫƙƘƜƟ Ʀȶ ƞƐƩơƤ. L r(R) 1–2 hoc sch. annotationi superiori continuat R (ǂƞƞƫƤ) 1 lm. addidi; annotatorem ƃƇŽ apud Sophoclem coniunctionem ȃƦƜ interpretatum esse conicias

167 (ƦơʝƛŪ ȏƢƘƝƗƣƔμƮƟƦƔ Ʀơʝ ƩƣƮƟơƧ ƦƐƞơƤ): ƗƜƔƨƧƖƮƟƦƔ ƦȶƟ ƛƏƟƔƦơƟ. L Ts.l. 1 ƗƜƔƨƧƖƮƟƦƔ: cf. sch. Eur. Andr. 414 ubi ȏƢƘƝƗƣƏμɾƤ per ǎƝƨƯƖɾƤ explanatur; Hesych. Ƨ 298 ȏƢƘƝƗƣƏμƫŭ ƨ[Ƙ]ƯƖƫ (Eur. Andr. 338) 1 lm. addidi

169 ƦơƜƔʝƦŪ ǒƨƣƔƙƘ : ǟ ƗƐƞƦơƤ ƦơƜƔʝƦƔ ǒƞƘƖƘƟ ƢƔƣȮ ƛƘʬƟ ƘǯμƏƣƛƔƜ, ȣƥƦƘ ƦơƯƦƫƟ ƛƏƦƘƣơƟ ƔȎƦʭ ƦƐƞơƤ ǒƥƘƥƛƔƜ ƦʬƟ ƢƮƟƫƟ. L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 169–70 ƦơƜƔʝƦŪ ǒƨƣƔƙƘ – ƢƮƟƫƟ ǒƞƘƖƘƟ transp. T

ǟ ƗƐƞƦơƤ post

sch. 160–3 – sch. 172

91

170 ƦʬƟ ǧƣƔƝƞƘƒƫƟ ǎƝƦƘƞƘƧƦɱƥƛƔƜ ƢƮƟƫƟ : ƦʬƟ ǏƔƧƦơʝ ƢƮƟƫƟ Ʀȶ ƦƐƞơƤŭ Ƣơƞȸ ƗȰ Ʀȶ ƦơƜơʝƦơ ƘǴƗơƤ ƢƔƣȮ ƢơƜƚƦƔʎƤ. L r(R) 2 Ʀȶ ƦơƜơʝƦơ ƘǴƗơƤ] i.e. quod ƦʬƟ ǧƣƔƝƞƘƒƫƟ ƢƮƟƫƟ pro ƦʬƟ ǏƔƧƦơʝ ƢƮƟƫƟ usurpat poeta, etsi subiectum verbi ǒƨƣƔƙƘ ipse est Hercules 1 lm. scripsi: ƦʬƟ ǧƣƔƝƞƘƒƫƟ R: deest in L

171–2 (ƦȲƟ –) ŸƫƗʬƟƜ ƗƜƥƥʬƟ ǎƝ ƢƘƞƘƜƏƗƫƟ : ƦȲƟ ǎƟ ŸƫƗưƟɾ ƦʀƤ żƘƥƢƣƫƦƒƔƤ ƨƚƖȶƟ ǎƨŪ ɓ ƗƯơ ƢƘƣƜƥƦƘƣƔȴ ƝƔƛƑμƘƟƔƜ ǎμƔƟƦƘƯơƟƦơ. ȟƤ ƾƢŪ ƘȎƛƘƒƔƤ ƗȰ ƦʀƤ ǟ ŸƫƗưƟ ȟƤ ƄƞƘƧƣưƟŭ ȋμƚƣơƤ ƗȰ ŸƫƗưƟƚƟ ƘǴƢƘƟ. L Ƈ r(R) 2 ȟƤ – fin.: cf. Ioh. Al. (= 11,28–12,3 Dindorf); [Arc.] 149, 5–8; Steph. Byz. 247,16– 248,12; Choer. sch. Th. 130, 10–4 alibi; Eust. Il. I 575, 2–4 3 ȋμƚƣơƤ: Il. 2.750, 16.234; Od. 14.327, 19.296 1 ƦȲƟ – 2 ǎμƔƟƦƘƯơƟƦơ] haec 1 lm. L supplevi: deest in TR; (ƗƫƗʬƟƜ ƗƜƥƥʬƟ n.) R verbo scholii 172.11 ƄƒƟƗƔƣơƤ (ƄƔƜɱƥƜƟ omisso) postposita sunt in T 1–2 ƦȲƟ ǎƟ ŸƫƗȻƟɾ ƦʀƤ żƘƥƢƣƫƦȵƔƤ] ŸƫƗȻƟƚƟ ƦȲƟ ǎƟ żƘƥƢƣƫƦȵɯ T 2 ƝƔƛƑμƘƟƔƜ] ƝƔƛƘƙƮμƘƟƔƜ R ȟƤ – fin. om. T 3 ƄƞƘƧƣưƟ] ǟ Ƅ. R ȋμƚƣơƤ ƗȰ] ƝƔȴ ȋμ. R

172 (ƗƜƥƥʬƟ ǎƝ ƢƘƞƘƜƏƗƫƟ): ȏƢƘƣƏƟƫ Ʀơʝ ǎƟ ŸƫƗưƟɾ μƔƟƦƘƒơƧ ƗƯơ ǤƥƔƟ ƢƐƞƘƜƔƜ ƗƜѴ ȥƟ ǎμƔƟƦƘƯƘƦơ ǿ źƘƯƤ, ȟƤ džƢƮƞƞƫƟ ƾƢȶ ƦƣƒƢơƗơƤ. ơǯ μȰƟ ơȓƦƫ ƞƐƖơƧƥƜ ƛƘƥƢƒƙƘƜƟ, ơǯ ƗȰ ơȓƦƫ ƦȮƤ ǯƘƣƘƒƔƤ ƖƣƔƒƔƤ ơȒƥƔƤŭ ƝƔȴ ƖȮƣ ƦơȸƤ ƖƐƣơƟƦƔƤ ơǯ ƀơƞơƥƥơȴ ƢƘƞƜơȸƤ ǾƟơμƏƙơƧƥƜƟ. ǧƣƮƗơƦơƤ ƗȰ ǎƟ 5 ƕŪ ƨƚƥƒŭ «ƄƘƞƘƜƏƗƘƤ ƗƐ μơƜ ƗơƝƐơƧƥƜ ƝƘƝƞʀƥƛƔƜ ƢƣȶƤ ŸƫƗƫƟƔƒƫƟ Ɣǯ ƖƧƟƔʎƝƘƤ, ƗƜƮƦƜ ƕƏƣƕƔƣơƜ ơȔƥƔƜ ǎƗƮƝơƧƟ ǿμơƒƫƤ ȂƣƟƜƥƜ ƨƛƐƖƖƘƥƛƔƜ, μƘƦȮ ƗȰ ƩƣƮƟơƟ ƗơƝơʝƥƜƟ ƾƟƛƣƫƢƒƟɾ ƨƫƟʁ ƨƛƐƖƠƔƥƛƔƜ» [ǎƢƘƒƢƘƣ ǎƝ żƚƕʬƟ ŵǮƖƧƢƦƒƫƟ ǤƥƔƟ]. ŹȎƣƜƢƒƗƚƤ ƦƣƘʎƤ ƖƘƖơƟƐƟƔƜ ƨƚƥȴƟ ƔȎƦƏƤ, ơǯ ƗȰ ƗƯơ, 10 ƝƔȴ ƦȲƟ μȰƟ ƘǮƤ ſƜƕƯƚƟ ƾƨƜƝƐƥƛƔƜ żƑƕƚƛƘƟ, ƘǮƤ Ʀȶ Ʀơʝ NJμμƫƟơƤ ƩƣƚƥƦƑƣƜơƟ, ƦȲƟ ƗȰ ƢƘƣȴ ƦȲƟ ŸƫƗưƟƚƟ, ȟƤ ƝƔȴ ƄƒƟƗƔƣơƤ ƄƔƜɱƥƜƟ. L Ƈ r(R) 3 ơǯ ƗȰ ơȓƦƫ – 4 ǾƟơμƏƙơƧƥƜƟ: cf. Strab. VII fr. 1a.5–8 ƨƔƥȴƟ ƗȰ ƝƔȴ ƝƔƦȮ ƦȲƟ ƦʬƟ ƀơƞơƦƦʬƟ ƝƔȴ żƘƥƢƣƫƦʬƟ ƖƞʬƦƦƔƟ ƦȮƤ ƖƣƔƒƔƤ ƢƘƞƒƔƤ (ƢƘƞƘƒƔƤ coni. Baladié)

92

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

ƝƔƞƘʎƥƛƔƜ ƝƔȴ ƦơȸƤ ƖƐƣơƟƦƔƤ ƢƘƞƒơƧƤ (ƢƘƞƘƒơƧƤ coni. Baladié); b.13–4 ȓƥƦƘƣơƟ ƗȰ ƦƣƘʎƤ ƾƢơƗƘƜƩƛʀƟƔƜ ƖƣƔƒƔƤ ƢƣơƨƑƦƜƗƔƤ, ǁƤ ƢƘƞƘƒƔƤ ƝƔƞƘʎƥƛƔƜ Ɩƞưƥƥɾ ƀơƞơƦƦʬƟ, ȟƤ ƦơȸƤ ƖƐƣơƟƦƔƤ ƢƘƞƘƒơƧƤ = Eust. Od. II 72. 32–3; c.15–6 ȃƦƜ ƝƔƦȮ żƘƥƢƣƫƦơȸƤ ƝƔȴ ƀơƞơƦƦơȸƤ ƦȮƤ ƖƣƔƒƔƤ ƢƘƞƘƒƔƤ (ƢƘƞƒƔƤ coni. Kramer) ƝƔȴ ƦơȸƤ ƖƐƣơƟƦƔƤ ƢƘƞƒơƧƤ (ƢƘƞƘƒơƧƤ coni. Baladié); Hesych. Ƣ 1308 ƢƘƞƘƒơƧƤ ŭ žʭơƜ ƝƔȴ ơǯ ǦƢƘƜƣʬƦƔƜ ƦơȸƤ ƖƐƣơƟƦƔƤ ƝƔȴ ƦȮƤ ƢƣƘƥƕƯƦƜƗƔƤ; 4 ǧƣƮƗơƦơƤ: II 57 ƄƘƞƘƜȯƗƘƤ Ɨȱ μơƜ ƗơƝȱơƧƥƜ ƝƞƚƛʀƟƔƜ ƢƣȶƤ ŸƫƗƫƟƔȵƫƟ ǎƢȴ ƦơʝƗƘ Ɣǯ ƖƧƟƔʎƝƘƤ, ƗƜȷƦƜ ƕȯƣƕƔƣơƜ ǤƥƔƟ, ǎƗȷƝƘơƟ Ɨȱ ƥƨƜ ǿμơȵƫƤ ȂƣƟƜƥƜ ƨƛȱƖƖƘƥƛƔƜ. ƀƘƦȮ ƗȰ ƩƣȷƟơƟ ƦȲƟ ƢƘƞƘƜȯƗƔ ƾƟƛƣƫƢƚȵɾ ƨƫƟʁ ƔȎƗȯƠƔƥƛƔƜ ƞȱƖơƧƥƜ 9 ŹȎƣƜƢƒƗƚƤ: fr. 1021 Kannicht 11 ƄƒƟƗƔƣơƤ: fr. 58 Maehler 1–12 haec cum sch. pr. coniuncta in codd. (ƘǮƤ ƔȎƦƮ L: ǂƞƞƫƤ R: sine voce coniunctiva Ƈ) separatim posui 1 lm. addidi ŸƫƗưƟɾ] ŸƫƗưƟƜ R 2 ƢƐƞƘƜƔƜ] ƢƘƞƜƔȴ R ǎμƔƟƦƘƯƘƦơ] ǎμƔƟƦƘƯơƟƦơ R ƾƢȶ] ǎƢȴ R ơǯ] ƝƔȴ ơǯ T 3 ơȓƦƫ om. T post ơȒƥƔƤ add. ƝƔȴ ƢƘƢơƞƜƫμȱƟƔƤ μƔƟƦƘȹƘƥƛƔƜ T 3–4 ƝƔȴ ƖȮƣ ƦơȸƤ] ƦơȸƤ ƗȰ T 4 ƀơƞơƥƥơȴ] ƀơƞơƥơȴ T ƢƘƞƜơƯƤ scripsi coll. [Arc.] 44, 17–9 qui hunc accentum praecipit: ƢơƞƜơȹƤ codd.: ƢƘƞƘƒơƧƤ Brunck1 ƗȰ om. T 5 ƕŪ L: ˶ƣƔ T p.c. a.c. 6 ƄƘƞƘƜƏƗƘƤ] ƢơƞƜƏƗƘƤ R ŸƫƗƫƟƔƒƫƟ LT : ŸƫƗƫƟƐƫƟ T 7 μƘƦȮ – 8 ƨƛƐƖƠƔƥƛƔƜ om. R 8 ƩƣƮƟơƟ] ƦȶƟ Ʃƣ. T ƨƛƐƖƠƔƥƛƔƜ] ƨƛƐƖƖƘƥƛƔƜ T ǎƢƘƒƢƘƣ] ǎƢƘȴ R ǎƢƘƒƢƘƣ – 9 ǤƥƔƟ delevi glossam ad ƕƏƣƕƔƣơƜ (7) esse iudicans: pars Herodotei loci est secundum Papageorgiou 9 ŹȎƣƜƢƒƗƚƤ] ŹȎƣ. ƗȰ T ƨƚƥȴƟ ƔȎƦƏƤ om. R ơǯ ƗȰ] ơȎ ƗȰ R: ǓƦƘƣơƜ T 10 ſƜƕƯƚƟ] ƞƧƕƒƔƟ R żƑƕƚƛƘƟ] ƛƑƕƚƟ R Ʀȶ] ƦȲƟ Ta 11 ƗȰ T: om. L post ƗȰ add. ƘǮƤ Ʀȶ Stephanus 337 ƢƘƣȴ] ƢƔƣȮ R ƦȲƟ om. T 12 ƄƔƜɱƥƜƟ om. TR, vide ad sch. 171–2.1–2

173 ƝƔȴ ƦʬƟƗƘ ƟƔμƐƣƦƘƜƔ : ƝƔȴ ƦʬƟ ƘǮƣƚμƐƟƫƟ ȏƢȶ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ ƾƞƑƛƘƜƔ ƟʝƟ ƾƢơƕƔƒƟƘƜ ǎƟ Ʀʭ ƢƔƣƮƟƦƜ ƩƣƮƟʪ, ȣƥƦƘ ǿƢƮƦƘƣơƟ ƢƣƔƩƛʀƟƔƜ. L r(R) 1 Hesych. Ɵ 50 ƟƔμȱƣƦƘƜƔ· ƾƞȳƛƘƜƔ 1 (lm.) ƟƔμƐƣƦƘƜƔ Lascaris: ƟƔμƘƣƦƘʎƔ L: deest in R; (ƦʬƟƗƘ ƟƚμƘƣƦƘʎƔ n.) R; accuratiss. vv. 173–4 ƝƔȴ ƦʬƟƗƘ – ƩƣƘưƟ 2 ƢƣƔƩƛʀƟƔƜ] ƾƩƛʀƟƔƜ R

176 (μƐƟƘƜƟ): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƙʀƟ. L 1 cf. sch. OC 425 ubi ƙƑƥƘƦƔƜ ad ǀƟ μƘƒƟƘƜƘƟ poetae refertur 1 lm. add. Elmsley; (μƐƟƘƜƟ s.) L

sch. 172 – sch. 185

93

178 (ƘȎƨƚμƒƔƟ ƟʝƟ DzƥƩŪ ): ƘȒƨƚμƔ ƨưƟƘƜ. Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

179a (ƢƣȶƤ ƩƏƣƜƟ): ƢƣȶƤ ǟƗơƟƑƟ. Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley; scholiastam ƩƏƣƜƟ pro ƩƔƣȮƟ legisse censuit Dindorf2 243–4 (cf. sch. 179b; sch. Ant. 30 ƢƣȶƤ ƩƏƣƜƟ ƕơƣɱƤ] ƢƣȶƤ ƦƐƣƪƜƟ ƦƣơƨʀƤ; Hesych. Ƣ 3938 ƢƣȶƤ ƩȯƣƜƟŭ ƢƣȶƤ ƦȱƣƪƜƟ)

179b ƢƣȶƤ ƩƏƣƜƟ ƞƮƖƫƟ : ƢƣȶƤ ƩƏƣƜƟ ƾƢƔƖƖƘƞơʝƟƦƔ, ƞƮƖƫƟ ǟƗơƟȲƟ ƗƜƗƮƟƦƔŭ ǎƝ Ʀơʝ ƥƦƘƨƏƟơƧ ƗȰ ƥƦơƩƏƙƘƦƔƜ ȃƦƜ μƐƞƞƘƜ ƩƣƚƥƦȮ ƾƢƔƖƖƐƞƞƘƜƟ. L Ƈ r(R) 1 lm. scripsi (scholiastam ƩƏƣƜƟ legisse coni. Dindorf2 243–4 (vide ad sch. 179a)): ƢƣȶƤ ƩƔƣȮƟ ƞƮƖƫƟ LT: deest in R; (ƥƦƘƒƩơƟƛŪ ǿƣʬ n.) R scholio praefigunt ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ TR ƞƮƖƫƟ] Ʀʭ ƞƮƖʪ R 2 ƗƜƗƮƟƦƔ] ƗƜƗƮƟƔƜ R BDR § 338, 3; 350, 2)] ƾƢƔƖƖƘƞƘʎƟ T

ǎƝ] ƝƔȴ R

2–3 ƾƢƔƖƖƐƞƞƘƜƟ (vide

181 (ȂƝƟơƧ): ƨƮƕơƧŭ ȋμƚƣơƤ ǾƝƟƘƒƫ Ɨ˸ dzƢƢƫƟ. Ls.l. 1–2 vide locos similes ad sch. 7b.2–3

1 ȋμƚƣơƤ: Il. 5.255

1 lm. add. Elmsley

185 (ƦƏƩŪ ): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƘȎƛƐƫƤ. L 1 ƦƏƩƔ per ƘȎƛƐƫƤ explanatur in sch. Eur. Phoen. 899; per ƦƔƩƐƫƤ in e.g. sch. OT. 372 ...Ʀȶ ƗȰ ƦȯƩƔ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƦƔƩȱƫƤŭ ơǵơƟ ƝƔȴ ƥȰ μƘƦŪ ǾƞȵƖơƟ ǎƣơʝƥƜ ƦƧƨƞȷƟ etc 1 lm. add. Elmsley; (ƦƏƩŪ s.) L

94

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

188a ǎƟ ƕơƧƛƘƣƘʎ ƞƘƜμʬƟƜ : μƐƖƔ ƛƐƣơƤ ǒƩơƟƦƜ ȃ ǎƥƦƜ ƞƑƜơƟŭ Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ ƕơƧ ǎƢƜƦƔƦƜƝƮƟ ǎƥƦƜƟ. L Ƈ 1 μƐƖƔ – ƞƑƜơƟ: aliter Hesych. ƕ 890 ƕơƧƛƘƣƘʎŭ ǎƟ ɣ ƕƮƘƤ ƛƐƣơƧƤ ȣƣɯ ƟƐμơƟƦƔƜ (Soph. Tr. 188). ƝƔȴ +ƕơƯƛơƣơƜ Ʀȶ ƔȎƦƮ; 1 Ʀȶ ƖƏƣ – fin.: cf. Eust. Il. I 385, 4 ƝƔȴ Ʀȶ ƕơƧ ƗȰ ǎƢƜƦƔƦƜƝȶƟ μƮƣƜơƟ ǎƝ Ʀơʝ ƦơƜơƯƦơƧ ƙʫơƧ (scil. ƕơƮƤ) ƘDzƞƚƢƦƔƜ 1 (lm.) ǎƟ om. Ƈ

μƐƖƔ] Ʀʭ μ. Ƈ

188b (ƕơƧƛƘƣƘʎ ): [Ǡ] Ʀʭ ƥƨƮƗƣƔ ƕƔƞƞơμƐƟʪ ƝƔȴ ƛƘƣơμƐƟʪ ǢƖơƧƟ ƛƘƣμƔƜƟơμƐƟʪ ȏƢȶ Ʀơʝ ǟƞƒơƧ. L Ƈ r(R) 1–2 haec separatim posui deleto Ǡ: cum sch. 188a coniunxit L: cum sch. 188c coniunxerunt ƇR 1 lm. addidi ƕƔƞƞơμƐƟʪ] ƗƜƔƕƔƞƞơμƐƟʪ R ƛƘƣơμƐƟʪ Ƈ (coni. iam Papageorgiou): ƝƔƛƔƜƣơμƐƟʪ LR: ƝƔƦƔƛƘƣơμƐƟʪ Lascaris 2 ƛƘƣμƔƜƟơμƐƟʪ post ǟƞƒơƧ transp. Ƈ

188c ƕơƧƛƘƣƘʎ : Ǡ ȂƟơμƔ Ʀơʝ ƞƘƜμʬƟơƤ Ǡ ƢơƞƧƛƘƣƘʎ (Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ ƕơƧ ǎƢƜƦƔƦƜƝƮƟ ǎƥƦƜƟ), ȃ ǎƥƦƜ ƢơƞƞƏƝƜƤ ƛƘƣƜƙơμƐƟʪ, dzƟŪ ƘDzƢɾ ƢơƞƧƨƮƣʪ. Ǡ ȏƢȶ ƕơʬƟ ƛƘƣƜƙơμƐƟʪ ƦơʎƤ ǿƗơʝƥƜ, ƦơƧƦƐƥƦƜ ƕơʝƤ ƦƣƐƨơƟƦƜ. L Ƈ r(R) 1–3 haec separatim posuit R: cum sch. 188b copulavit L (ǂƞƞƫƤ): cum sch. 188a copulavit T 1 lm. ex L: ǎƟ ƕơƧƛƘƣƘʎ ƞƘƜμʬƟƜ R: deest in Ƈ 1 Ǡ ȂƟơμƔ – 2 ƛƘƣƜƙơμƐƟʪ om. Ƈ 1 Ʀơʝ ƞƘƜμʬƟơƤ om. in spatio vacuo R ƖȮƣ ƕơƧ om. in spatio vacuo R 2 ǎƢƜƦƔƦƜƝƮƟ] ƾƦƦƜƝƮƟ R ǎƥƦƜƟ om. R ƢơƞƞƏƝƜƤ] ƢơƞƞȮ R ƛƘƣƜƙơμƐƟʪ om. in spatio vacuo R dzƟѴ] dzƟƔ R ƘDzƢɾ] ƘDzƚ Ƈ ƢơƞƧƨƮƣʪ] Ʀʭ Ƣ. Ƈ 2– 3 Ǡ ȏƢȶ om. R 3 ƦơƧƦƐƥƦƜ] Ǡ R

192 ƔȎƦȶƤ ƗȰ ƢʬƤ ǂƢƘƥƦƜƟ : ƘǮ ƘȎƦƧƩƘʎ ǿ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ, ƢʬƤ ǂƢƘƥƦƜƟ ǿ ſƒƩƔƤ ƝƔȴ ơȎƝ ǤƞƛƘ ƦƔƩƐƫƤ ƾƢƔƖƖƐƞƞƫƟ; L T r(R) 1 lm. deest in TR; (ƢʬƤ n.) R; accuratiss. v. 192 ƔȎƦȶƤ – ƘȎƦƧƩƘʎ; ƘȎƦƧƩƘʎ] ƘȎƦƧƩƑƤ R post ƘȎƦƧƩƘʎ add. ƨƚƥȴƟ T 2 ǤƞƛƘ] ǒƥƦƚ R ƾƢƔƖƖƐƞƞƫƟ] ƾƢƔƖƖƘƞʬƟ praebet T, idque recepit Brunck1 prob. Nauck 430, sed cf. locos quos cum nostro composuit Bernardakis 59, i.e. sch. Ai. 27a; ibid. 1318 (ƾƟƔƥƦƐƞƞƫƟ codd., recte); id. OT 924; ibid. 1223; id. OC 1579

sch. 188a – sch. 196

95

193 ơȎƝ ƘȎμƔƣƘƒɯ [ƩƣưμƘƟơƤ]: oȎ ʜɯƥƦưƟɾ. L r(R) 1 Phot. Ƙ 2245 ƘȎμƏƣƘƜƔƟŭ ʜɯƥƦưƟƚƟ, ƘȎƩƐƣƘƜƔƟ…; Eust. Il. III 624, 10–11 ȃƛƘƟ ƝƔȴ ƘȎμȯƣƘƜƔ ƝƔƦȮ ƦơȸƤ ƢƔƞƔƜơȸƤ ǟ ƘȎƩȱƣƘƜƔ, ǟ ʜɯƥƦȻƟƚ 1 lm. L decurtavit Brunck2: deest in R; (ƘȎμƔƣƘƒɯ n.) R

193–5 (ơȎƝ ƘȎμƔƣƘƒɯ – ƢƘƣƜƥƦƏƤ): ơȎ ƝƔƦƔƨƣơƟƑƥƘƜ ƥơʝ ǂƢƘƥƦƜƟ ƾƞƞȮ ƝƣƜƟƮμƘƟơƤ ȏƢȶ ƦʬƟ ƢơƞƜƦʬƟŭ Ʀȶ ƗȰ ơȎ Ƣơƞƞʁ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ơȎƗȰ ǾƞƒƖɾ. ƦƜƟȰƤ ƗȰ ơȓƦƫƤŭ ơȎƝ ƘȎƩƘƣƘƒɯ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ơȎƝ ǒƥƦƜƟ ƔȎƦʭ ƘȎƩƘƣƐƤ ƢƔƣƔƖƘƟƐƥƛƔƜ. L T r(R) 3 ƘȎƩƘƣƘƒɯ: cf. sch. Ph. 284 ubi ƘȎμƏƣƘƜƔƟ per ƘȎƩƐƣƘƜƔƟ explicatur; Hesych. Ƙ 6976 ƘȎμȯƣƘƜƔ· ƘȎƩȱƣƘƜƔ...; Ɔ Ƙ 959 ƘȎμƏƣƘƜƔƜŭ ƘȎƩƐƣƘƜƔƜ = Phot. Ƙ 2243; Ƙ 2245; Su. Ƙ 3576; Eust. Il. III 624, 10–11 ȃƛƘƟ ƝƔȴ ƘȎμȯƣƘƜƔ ƝƔƦȮ ƦơȸƤ ƢƔƞƔƜơȸƤ ǟ ƘȎƩȱƣƘƜƔ, ǟ ʜɯƥƦȻƟƚ 1–4 haec separatim posui: cum sch. pr. coniunxerunt LR (sine voce coniunctiva): scholio 192 continuavit Ƈ (ƢƣȶƤ ȁ ƾƢơƗȵƗƫƥƜƟ) ǂƢƘƥƦƜƟ] ƾƢƐƥƦƚƟ R 1 lm. addidi 3 post ơȓƦƫƤ add. ƾƟƦƜƖƣƏƨƘƜ ƦƔʝƦƔ R ante ơȎƝ ƘȎƩƘƣƘƒɯ subauditur ơȎƝ ƘȎμƔƣƘƒɯ ƘȎƩƘƣƘƒɯ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ om. R in spatio vacuo

194 MƚƞƜƘȸƤ ǃƢƔƤ ƞƘưƤ : ƀƚƞƜƘʎƤ ǒƛƟơƤ żƘƦƦƔƞƜƝȶƟ ƢƞƚƥƒơƟ ƇƣƔƩʎƟơƤŭ ƀƚƞƒƔ ƗȰ ǟ ƢƮƞƜƤ ƝƔƞƘʎƦƔƜ. L Ts.l. r(R) 1–2 cf. sch. Ph. 725 ...ƢƘƣȴ ƦȲƟ ƇƣƔƩʎƟƔ ƖȮƣ ơǯ ƀƚƞƜƘʎƤ; sch. Ph. 4 ƦȶƟ ƀƚƞƜɱ: ƦȶƟ żƘƥƥƔƞȷƟ, ƾƢȶ ƢȷƞƘƫƤ; Steph. Byz. 450, 13 … ơǯ ƗŪ ǎƟ żƘƦƦƔƞȵɯ ƀƚƞƜƘʎƤ… 1 lm. deest in ƇR; (ƔȎƦȶƟ MƚƞƜƘȸƤ n.) R żƘƦƦƔƞƜƝȶƟ] żƘƥƥƔƞƒƔƤ R ƢƞƚƥƒơƟ – fin. om. Ƈ 2 ƀƚƞƒƔ L (‘fictum nomen urbis ab scholiasta’ Dindorf 69): ƀƚƞƜʬ R

196 (Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ ƢơƛơʝƟ): Ʀȶ ƢơƛơƯμƘƟơƟ. L 1 lm. add. Lascaris

96

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

197 (μƘƛƘʎƦơ): ƾƢơƞƯƥƘƜƘƟ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

198 ơȎƩ ǏƝưƟ, ǏƝơʝƥƜ ƗƐ : ƦơʎƤ ƀƚƞƜƘʝƥƜƟ ƔȎƦƮƤ, ǿ ſƒƩƔƤ, ƥƯƟƘƥƦƜƟ ơȎƩ ǏƝưƟŭ ƕơƯƞƘƦƔƜ ƖȮƣ ƔȎƦȶƤ ƔȎƦʬƟ ƾƢơƥƦȮƤ ǎƞƛƘʎƟ ƢƣȶƤ ƥƐ. L T r(R) 1 lm. deest in ƇR; (ǎƝƘʎƟơƤ s.) R; accuratiss. vv. 198–9 ǎƝƘʎƟơƤ ơȎƩ ǏƝȺƟ – ƠƯƟƘƥƦƜƟ post ƀƚƞƜƘʝƥƜ add. ƨƚƥȴƟ Ƈ 2 ƔȎƦȶƤ om. Ƈ Lp (Lascaris)

200 ǂƦơμơƟ : ƦȶƟ ƾƢƮƣƛƚƦơƟŭ ƥƧμƕƔƞƮƟƦƘƤ ƖȮƣ ơǯ ƗƧƥμƘƟƘʎƤ ƗɾơʝƥƜ ƦȮ ƩƫƣƒƔ. ǂμƘƜƟơƟ ƗȰ ƦȶƟ ƾƨƜƘƣƫμƐƟơƟ ƛƘơʎƤ ƝƔȴ ƾƖƘưƣƖƚƦơƟ, ȁƟ ơȎƗȰ ƕơƦȮ ƝƔƦƔƕƮƥƝƘƦƔƜŭ ƦȮ ƗȰ ƦơƜƔʝƦƔ ƩƫƣƒƔ ǾƣƖƏƗƔƤ ǎƝƏƞơƧƟ. L T r(R) 2 ƾƨƜƘƣƫμƐƟơƟ ƛƘơʎƤ: cf. Phot. 344, 24 ȆƣƖƏƗƘƤ: ƦȮ ǯƘƣȮ ƩƫƣƒƔ... contra Hesych. ơ 1105 ǾƣƖƏƗƘƤŭ ƖƘƖƘƫƣƖƚμƐƟơƜ ƦƮƢơƜ

ƾƖƘưƣƖƚƦơƟ:

1 ǂƦơμơƟ Ƈ: Ȥ źƘʝ, ƦȶƟ ƃDzƦƚƤ ǂƦơμơƟ L: deest in R; (ƦȶƟ ƃDzƦƚƤ n.) R ƥƧμƕƔƞƮƟƦƘƤ] ƥƧƞƞƔƕȺƟ ƖȮƣ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƥƧμƕƔƞƞƮƟƦƘƤ R ƥƧμƕƔƞƮƟƦƘƤ – 2 ƩƫƣƒƔ ita retractavit Ƈ: ȁƟ ơǯ ƗƧƥμƘƟƘʎƤ ƥƧμƕƔƞƮƟƦƘƤ ơȎ ƗɾơʝƥƜƟ Ƈ 2 ƦȶƟ ƾƨƜƘƣƫμƐƟơƟ] Ʀȶ ƾƨƔƜƣƫμƐƟơƟ R 3 post ƝƔƦƔƕƮƥƝƘƦƔƜ add. ƝƔȴ ƦƐμƟƘƜ Ƈ

202 ƨƫƟƑƥƔƦŪ Ȥ ƖƧƟƔʎƝƘƤ : ƾƟƦȴ ǾƞơƞƯƠƔƦƘ ƝƔȴ ƕơƑƥƔƦƘ ƩƏƣƜƟ ǿμơƞơƖơʝƥƔƜ ƦơʎƤ ƛƘơʎƤ. L Ts.l. r(R) 1 lm. deest in ƇR ƾƟƦȴ] ƾƟ. Ʀơʝ Ƈ: om. R homoeoteleuton 2 ƦơʎƤ ƛƘơʎƤ] ƦơȸƤ ƛƘơȸƤ R

ƝƔȴ ƕơƑƥƔƦƘ om. R propter

203–4 ȟƤ ǂƘƞƢƦơƟ ȂμμŪ ǎμơȴ | ƨƑμƚƤ: ȂμμƔ ƨƑμƚƤ ƨƚƥȴƟ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƦȶƟ ƨƔƟƘƣʬƤ ƾƢƔƖƖƘƒƞƔƟƦƔ Ǡ Ʀȶ ƾƢȶ ƦʀƤ ƨƑμƚƤ ƨʬƤŭ ƾƟƔƥƩȶƟ ƗȰ ƾƟƔƨƔƟƐƟ, ƾƟƔƦƘʎƞƔƟ, ǎƝ μƘƦƔƨơƣɱƤ Ʀơʝ ǟƞƒơƧ. L Ts.l. r(R)

97

sch. 197 – sch. 207–8b

3 ƾƟƔƦƘʎƞƔƟ: cf. Hesych. Ɣ 5218 ƾƟƒƥƩƘƜŭ ƾƟƔƦƐƞƞƘƜ; Lex. Vind. Ɣ 146b ƾƟƒƥƩƘƜ ǿ ǣƞƜơƤ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƾƟƔƦƐƞƞƘƜ; Hesych. Ɣ 5220 ƾƟƒƥƩƫƟŭ ƾƟƔƦƐƞƞƫƟ = Ɔ Ɣ 651 = Phot. Ɣ 2014 = S Ɣ 2483 + 1 lm. ex L: deest in ƇR; (ǂƘƞƢƦơƟ ȂμμŪ n.) R 1 ȂμμƔ o 2 Ǡ om. Ƈ 2 Ʀȶ o ƨʬƤ (post ƨʬƤ additis ȂμμƔ ƞƐƖƘƜ) supra v. 203 leguntur in Ƈ post ƨƑμƚƤ add. ƨƚƥȴƟ R ƨʬƤ om. R ƾƟƔƥƩȶƟ RLpp.c. (Lascaris): ƾƟƔƥƩȺƟ LLpa.c.: om. Ƈ ƗȰ om. ƇR ƾƟƔƨƔƟȰƟ o fin. supra v. 204 leguntur in Ƈ

206 ǎƨƘƥƦƒơƜƤ ƾƞƔƞƔʎƤ : ƦƔʎƤ ǎƢȴ ƦʬƟ ƛƧƥƜʬƟ ƘȎƩƔʎƤŭ ƾƟƦȴ ǿ ƢɱƤ ơǴƝơƤ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ ƛƧƥƒƔƤ ƝƔȴ ƘȎƩȮƤ ƢơƜƘƒƦƫ. L T r(R) 1 lm. ex L (ƾƞƔƞƔʎƤ pro ƾƞƔƞƔƖƔʎƤ etiam apud poetam in L): ǎƨƘƥƦƒơƜƤ ƾƞƞƔƞƔƖƔʎƤ, sic ut apud poetam Ƈ: deest in R; (ƗƮμơƧƤ n.) R; pars ƾƟƦȴ – fin. ad lm. latius, vv. 205–6 ƾƟơƞơƞƧƠƏƦƫ – ƾƞƔƞƔʎƤ, spectat (interpretem ƾƟơƞơƞƧƠƏƦƫ ƗƮμơƤ cognovisse coni. Wolff 49) ƦʬƟ om. R ƾƟƦȴ] ƾƟ. Ʀơʝ ƇR 2 ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ] Ʀơʝ ǧƣ. Ƈ ƢơƜƘƒƦƫ] ƢơƜƑƦƫ R

207–8a ǎƟ ƗȰ ƝơƜƟƮƤ – DzƦƫ : ƘDz ƦƜƤ μƘƞƞƮƟƧμƨƮƤ ǎƥƦƜƟ ƘDzƦƘ ƖƘƖƔμƚƝȺƤ ǟƝƐƦƫŭ ƝơƜƟȲ ƖȮƣ ƢƏƟƦƫƟ ǎƥƦƒƟ ƘȎƩƑ. L T r(R) 1 lm. scripsi: ǿ μƘƞƞƮƟƧμƨơƤ L: deest in R et Ƈ, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 206 copulet (ƝƔȴ ƘDz ƦƜƤ); (μƘƞƞƮƟƧμƨơƤ n.) R ƘDz ƦƜƤ] ƘDzƦƘ R 2 ƖȮƣ om. R ƢƏƟƦƫƟ om. Ƈ

207–8b (ǎƟ ƗȰ ƝơƜƟȶƤ– ƝƞƔƖƖƏ ): ǟƝƐƦƫ ƗȰ ƢɱƥƔ ƝƞƔƖƖȲ ƾƣƥƐƟƫƟ ƦƘ ƝƔȴ ƛƚƞƘƜʬƟ, ƝơƜƟȲƟ ƘȎƩȲƟ ƢơƜƚƥƏƦƫ. L T r(R) 1 haec a sch. pr. segregavi add. ƝƔȴ Ƈ

lm. addidi

ƢɱƥƔ] ƢɱƥƜ R

ƦƘ om. ƇR

2 ante ƝơƜƟȲƟ

98

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

207–8c (ƝơƜƟȻƤ…ƝƞƔƖƖƏ ): Ʀȶ ƝơƜƟȶƤ džƦƦƜƝƮƟ ǎƥƦƜƟ ȟƤ ƝƞƧƦȶƤ ǷƢƢơƗƏμƘƜƔ. L T 1–2 cf. sch. 416a1, sch. 446a; sch. Eur. Hec. 149 (ad ǾƣƨƔƟƮƟ, i.e. ǗƝƏƕƚƟ, spectans): ǒƣƚμơƟ. ȟƤ «ƝƞƧƦȶƤ ǷƢƢơƗȯμƘƜƔ» [Ŷ 742]; ibid. 296 (ad lm. ƥƦƘƣƣƮƤ): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƥƦƘƣƣȯ, ȟƤ «ƝƞƧƦȶƤ ǷƢƢơƗȯμƘƜƔ» [Ŷ 742]. džƦƦƜƝȶƟ ƗȰ Ʀȶ ƥƩʀμƔ; ibid. 299; id. Andr. 711; sch. Aesch. Pr. 592b; sch. Hom. Il. 2.742 ȃƦƜ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƝƞƧƦȳ ƝƞƧƦȷƤ ƘǴƢƘƟ; Apollon. Dysc. Constr. 293, 3–12; Eust. Il. III 27, 27 – 28, 5 Ƈȶ ƗȰ ƾƟƘƝƦȷƤ ǶƫƟƜƝʬƤ ƝƔȴ džƦƦƜƝʬƤ ǒƩƘƜ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƾƟƘƝƦȳ ƝƔƛŪ ǿμơƜȷƦƚƦƔ Ʀơʝ [ǟ ƾƣƖȷƤ ƝƔȴ Ʀơʝ ǮƔƦƣȷƤ ƝƔȴ μȯƖơƤ ƦȱƩƟƚ, ƝƔȴ Ʀơʝ] ƝƞƧƦȶƤ ǷƢƢơƗȯμƘƜƔ, ƝƔȴ Ʀơʝ «ƾƖƖƘƞƛƘʎƥȯ μơƜ ƖƘƟƟƔʎơƤ», ƝƔȴ ƦʬƟ ǿμơȵƫƟ, ơǵƤ ơȎ μȷƟơƟ ƾƟȯƞơƖƔ Ʀȶ ƝơƜƟȶƤ ƝƞƔƖƖȳ, ǟ ƝơƜƟȳ, ƝƔȴ μơʎƣƔ ƗƜƔƜƣƘƦȷƤ ƝƔȴ ƖƧƟȲ ƥƜƖƚƞȷƤ ƝƔȴ μƘμƢƦȷƤ ƝƔȴ ƢƚμơƟȲ ƞƔƛƣƔʎơƤ ƝƔȴ ƟȷƥơƤ ǎƢƔƝƦȷƤ, ƾƞƞȮ ƝƔȴ ǏƦƘƣơʎƔ, ǿƢơʎơƟ Ʀȶ ƦȹƩƚ ƥƫƦȳƣ ƝƔȴ ƗȷƝƚƥƜƤ ƾƖƟȻƤ. (v. 114–8) 2 Hom. Il. 2.742 1 lm. addidi post ƝơƜƟȶƤ add. ƗȰ Ƈ, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 207–8b coniungat 2 ƝƞƧƦȶƤ] Ʀȶ Ɲƞ. Ƈ

212 ƕơɱƦƘ ƦȮƟ ǿμƮƥƢơƣơƟ : ƾƟƧμƟƘʎƦƘ ƝƔȴ ƦƜμɱƦƘ ƦȲƟ ǃμƔ Ʀʭ džƢƮƞƞƫƟƜ ƥƢƔƣƘʎƥƔƟ, ƦȲƟ ǎƟ ȆƣƦƧƖƒɯ ƦƜμƫμƐƟƚƟ. ƁƯμƨƔƤ ƗƐ ƨƚƥƜ ƦȮƤ ȆƣƘƥƦƜƏƗƔƤ ƢƔƣƮƥơƟ ǎƟ ƦơʎƤ ȂƣƘƥƜ ƗƜƔƦƣƒƕƘƜ ǟ NJƣƦƘμƜƤ. L T r(R) 1 lm. deest in TR; (ƕơɱƦƘ ƦȮƟ n.) R; accuratiss. vv. 212–5 ƕơɱƦƘ – ƁƯμƨƔƤ ƾƟƧμƟƘʎƦƘ, ƘƜ in rasura in L ƾƟƧμƟƘʎƦƘ] ƾƟƧμƟ. ƨƚƥȴ T ƦƜμɱƦƘ L (ƦƜμɱƦƔƜ dedit Papageorgiou) et TR ƦȲƟ om. R 2 ƥƢƔƣƘʎƥƔƟ] ƥ. NJƣƦƘμƜƟ T: om. R ƦȲƟ] ƝƔȴ ƦȲƟ R ȆƣƦƧƖƒɯ] ȆƣƖƒɯ R 3 ƗƜƔƦƣƒƕƘƜ ǟ NJƣƦƘμƜƤ] ǟ NJƣ. ƗƜƔƦƣ. Ƈ

214 ƾμƨƒƢƧƣơƟ : ƢƔƣƮƥơƟ ƾμƨơƦƐƣƔƜƤ ƦƔʎƤ ƩƘƣƥȴ ƗɯƗơƧƩƘʎ ǟ ƔȎƦȲ ơȔƥƔ Ʀʁ ǗƝƏƦɾ. L Ƈs.l. 1 ƾμƨơƦƐƣƔƜƤ – ƗɯƗơƧƩƘʎ: cf. sch. Ar. Ra. 1361b (ad lm. ƗƜƢƯƣơƧƤ ƾƟƐƩơƧƥƔ

ƞƔμƢƏƗƔƤ) ȃƦƜ ƞƔμƢȯƗƔƤ ǒƩƘƜ ƗƜƦƦȯƤ 1–2 sch. 214 post sch. 216 collocat L, adscriptis tamen litteris Ɣʳ et ƕʳ T ƢƔƣƮƥơƟ] ȃƦƜ T

1 lm. deest in

sch. 207–8c – sch. 217b2

99

216 ƾƘƒƣơμŪ : μƘƦƘƫƣƒƙơμƔƜ ǎƟ Ʀʭ ƩơƣƘƯƘƜƟ ƘǮƤ ƦȶƟ ƾƐƣƔ ƝƔȴ ǂƟƫ ƔDzƣơμƔƜŭ Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ μƘƞƜƗƏƣƜơƟ ơȎƝ ǒƥƦƜ ƥƦƏƥƜμơƟ, ƾƞƞŪ ȏƢȶ ƦʀƤ ǟƗơƟʀƤ ǾƣƩơʝƟƦƔƜ. L T r(R) 1–2 ǂƟƫ ƔDzƣơμƔƜ: Hesych. Ɣ 1307 ƾƘȵƣơμƔƜŭ ǂƟƫ ƔDzƣơμƔƜ. ƆơƨơƝƞʀƤ ƇƣƔƩƜƟȵƔƜƤ (216) 1–3 de ordine in L vide ad sch. 214 1 lm. ƾƘƒƣơμŪ scripsit Brunck2: ƾƘƒƣơμƔƜ Ƈ: ƾƘƒƣơμŪ (sic L; ƾƘƒƣơμƔƜ dedit Papageorgiou) ơȎƗŪ ƾƢưƥơμƔƜ L: deest in R; (ƦȶƟ ƔȎƞȶƟ n.) R ante μƘƦƘƫƣƒƙơμƔƜ add. ƦơƧƦƐƥƦƜ Ƈ 1–2 ƝƔȴ ǂƟƫ ƔDzƣơμƔƜ om. T 2 ƔDzƣơμƔƜ] ǒƣƩơμƔƜ R μƘƞƜƗƏƣƜơƟ] μƘƞȹƗƣƜơƟ T; de formis diminutivis in –ƜƗ-ƔƣƜơƟ cf. e.g. Arist. Rhet. 1405b 31 ƩƣƧƥƜƗƏƣƜơƟ, ǯμƔƦƜƗƏƣƜơƟ; vide etiam Debrunner, Griech. Wortbild. §295 et Chantraine, Formation des Noms §57

217a [ƦȶƟ ƔȎƞƮƟ,] Ȥ ƦƯƣƔƟƟƘ : Ȥ ƔȎƞȰ Ǡ Ȥ ǧƣƏƝƞƘƜƤ Ǡ Ȥ ŸƜƮƟƧƥƘ. L Ts.l. 1 haec supra v. 221 tamquam ad ƢƔƜƏƟ pertinentia leguntur in T Brunck2: deest in T

lm. L decurtavit

217b1 (Ȥ ƦƯƣƔƟƟƘ – ƨƣƘƟƮƤ): Ȥ ƔȎƞƐ, ƦʀƤ ǎμʀƤ ƪƧƩʀƤ ƦƯƣƔƟƟƘŭ ǎƣƘƛƒƙƘƜ ƖȮƣ ǿ ƔȎƞȶƤ ƦȮƤ ƢƔƣƛƐƟơƧƤ ƢƣȶƤ ƦȲƟ ƩơƣƘƒƔƟ. L r(R); cf. gll. in Ts.l. 1–2 hoc sch. separatim post sch. 218 collocat R: cum sch. 217a coniunxit L (ǂƞƞƫƤ) 1 lm. addidi; (ƦȶƟ ƔȎƞȶƟ s.) R 1–2 Ȥ ƔȎƞƐ - ƩơƣƘƒƔƟ] ƔȎƞƐ gl. ad ƦƯƣƔƟƟŪ, ƦʀƤ ƪƧƩʀƤ gl. ad ƨƣƘƟƮƤ, nec plura T, sed vide ad sch. 217b2.1

217b2 (Ȥ ƦƯƣƔƟƟƘ – ƨƣƘƟƮƤ): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ Ȥ ƝƣƔƦʬƟ ƦʀƤ ǎμʀƤ ƨƣƘƟƮƤŭ ǎƟ ƗȰ Ʀʭ ƦƔʝƦƔ ƞƐƖƘƜƟ ǾƣƩơʝƟƦƔƜ ȏƢȶ ƩƔƣɱƤ. L T r(R) 1–2 haec a sch. pr. separavi 1 ante ƾƟƦȴ verba ƢƣȶƤ ƦȲƟ ƩơƣƘƒƔƟ ex sch. pr. sumpta posuit T 2 ǾƣƩơʝƟƦƔƜ] ǾƣƩƘʎƦƔƜ T (vide 1)

100

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

218 ǮƗơƯ μŪ ƾƟƔƦƔƣƏƥƥƘƜ | ƘȎơʎ μŪ : ƘǮƤ ŶƔƝƩƜƝȲƟ ǃμƜƞƞƔƟ, ƦơƧƦƐƥƦƜ ƩơƣƘƒƔƟ, ƢƔƣơƣμɲ μƘ ǿ ƝƜƥƥƮƤ. Ʀȶ ƗȰ ȏƢơƥƦƣƐƨƫƟ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƾƢȶ ƞƯƢƚƤ ƘǮƤ ǟƗơƟȲƟ μƘƦƏƖƫƟ Ǡ ȏƢơƕƏƞƞƫƟ. L Ts.l. r(R); cf. etiam gll. in Ƈs.l. 1 lm. deest in TR; (μŪ ƾƟƔƦƔƣƏƥƥƘƜ n.) R; accuratiss. vv. 218–20 ǮƗơƯ μŪ – ǃμƜƞƞƔƟ (lm.) ƘȎơʎ] Ƙȏơʎ L (ut apud poetam L) ƘǮƤ – 2 ƝƜƥƥƮƤ] ƢƔƣơƣμɲ μƘ gl. ad ƘȎơʎ μŪ, ƕƔƝƩƜƝȲƟ gl. ad ƕƔƝƩƘȵƔƟ, ƩơƣƘƒƔƟ gl. ad ǃμƜƞƞƔƟ, nec plura T 2 Ʀȶ ƗȰ ȏƢơƥƦƣƐƨƫƟ om. T, quippe qui verba ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ (2) – fin. supra verbum poetae ȏƢơƥƦƣƐƨƫƟ scripsit 3 ƘǮƤ ǟƗơƟȲƟ om. R Ǡ om. T

223 ƾƟƦƒƢƣʪƣƔ : ǎƟƔƟƦƒƔ, ƾƟƦƜƝƘƒμƘƟƔ ƦơʎƤ ƢƣơƦƐƣơƜƤ ƝƔƝơʎƤ, ƾƖƔƛƏ. Ǡ ƾƟƦƜƢƣƮƥƫƢƔ, ȏƢŪ ȂƪƜƟ ǿƣưμƘƟƔŭ ȏƢơƗƘƜƝƟƯơƧƥƜ ƗȰ ƦȶƟ ſƒƩƔƟ ǎƣƩƮμƘƟơƟ. L T r(R) 2 ƾƟƦƜƢƣƮƥƫƢƔ: cf. Hesych. Ɣ 5466 ƾƟƦȵƢƣƫƣƔ· ƾƟƦƜƢƣȷƥƫƢƔ. ƄƣȻƣƔ ƖȮƣ Ʀȶ ƢƣȷƥƫƢơƟ, ƝƔȴ ƾƟƗƣȷƢƣƫƣơƟ· ƾƟƗƣơƢƣȷƥƫƢơƟ. ƆơƨơƝƞʀƤ ƇƣƔƩƜƟȵƔƜƤ (223) 1 lm.] deest in R; (ƾƟƦƒƢƣʪƣƔ n.) R ȏƢơƗƘƒƝƟƧƥƜ T ƗȰ om. R

2 ǿƣưμƘƟƔ] ƗƣưμƘƟƔ T

ȏƢơƗƘƜƝƟƯơƧƥƜ]

228 (ƩƔƣƦƮƟ): ǂƠƜơƟ ƩƔƣɱƤ. L Ts.l. r(R) 1 cf. Ɔ Ʃ 36 ƩƔƣƦƏŭ ƩƔƣɱƤ ǂƠƜƔ = Su. Ʃ 141; Hesych. Ʃ 212 ƩƔƣƦƮƤŭ ƩƔƣɱƤ ǂƠƜơƤ... 1 lm. add. Lascaris; (ƩƔƣƦƮƟ s.) L

230a1 ƝƔƦŪ ǒƣƖơƧ ƝƦʀƥƜƟ : ƝƔƦȮ ƦȲƟ Ʀơʝ ǒƣƖơƧ ƢƣɱƠƜƟ, ƦơƧƦƐƥƦƜƟ ƾƠƒƫƤ ƦʀƤ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ ƾƣƘƦʀƤ ƢƣơƥƨƫƟơƯμƘƛƔ. L T r(R) 1 lm. deest in TR; (ǒƣƖơƧ ƝƦʀƥƜƟ n.) R; 2 ƾƣƘƦʀƤ post ƢƣơƥƨƫƟơƯμƘƛƔ transp. T

post ƢƣɱƠƜƟ add. ƨƚƥȴ T

ƦơƧƦƐƥƦƜƟ –

sch. 218 – sch. 238b

101

230a2 (ƝƔƦŪ ǒƣƖơƧ ƝƦʀƥƜƟ): ƾƟƦȴ ƝƔƦȮ ƦȲƟ ƾƢƔƖƖƘƞȵƔƟ. L; cf. gl. in Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris; (ƝƔƦŪ s.) L ƾƟƦȴ – fin.] ƦȲƟ ǎƢƔƖƖƘƞȵƔƟ gl. ad ƝƦʀƥƜƟ nec plura T

230–1 (ǂƟƗƣƔ – ǒƢƚ): ƾƟƦȴ ơdzƫƟ ǒƗƘƜ ƦƧƩƘʎƟ ƢƣơƥƨƫƟƚμƏƦƫƟ ƦơȸƤ ƦȮ ƦơƜƔʝƦƔ ƝƔƦƘƜƣƖƔƥμƐƟơƧƤ, ǎƦƯƩơμƘƟ. L T r(R) 1–2 haec a sch. 230a1 segregavi

1 lm. addidi

ƾƟƦȴ] ƾƟ. Ʀơʝ TR

236 (ƢƔƦƣʫƔƤ): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǗƞƞƏƗơƤŭ džƣƖƘʎơƤ ƖȮƣ ǿ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ. L Ƈs.l. 1 lm. add. Brunck2

ǗƞƞƏƗơƤ] ƦʀƤ Ǘƞƞ. T

237 ǿƣƒƙƘƦƔƜ : ƝƔƦƔƥƝƘƧƏƙƘƜ, dzƥƦƚƥƜƟ. Ls.l. T 1 lm. sic T: deest in L inverso ordine T

238a ƦƐƞƚ ƛƧƥƒƔƤ. L Ƈ r(R) 1 Eust. Il. III 15, 6–8 ƆȹƥƦơƜƩơƟ ƗȰ Ʀʁ ƦơƜƔȹƦɾ ƥƚμƔƥȵɯ ƝƔȴ Ʀȶ ƗƚƞơʝƟ ƦȲƟ ƛƧƥȵƔƟ ƦȱƞơƤ, ơȕ ƩƣʀƥƜƤ ƝƔȴ ƢƔƣȮ ƆơƨơƝƞƘʎ ǎƟ Ʀʭ «Ʀȱƞƚ ǒƖƝƔƣƢƔ», ȁ ƾƞƞƔƩơʝ ƗƜƔƥƔƨʬƟ ǒƨƚ «ƛȹμƔƦƔ ƢȯƖƝƔƣƢƔ»; ibid. III 354, 1 ƗʀƞơƟ ƗŪ ȃƦƜ ƦƐƞơƤ ƝƔȴ ǟ ƛƧƥƒƔ 1 lm. ex L: ƦƐƞƚ ƗȰ T quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 237 conectat: om. R; (ƕƫμơȸƤ n.) R lemmati verba ƦƐƞƚ ƦŪ ǒƖƝƔƣƢƔ praeposuit L

238b ǒƖƝƔƣƢƔ [ƗȰ] ƦȮ ƛƧμƜƏμƔƦƔ ƾƢȶ ƾƟƛʬƟ Ǡ ƝƔƣƢʬƟ. L Ƈ r(R) 1 haec a sch. pr. separavi 1 ƦƐƞƚ addidi ƗȰ delevi post ƗȰ add. ǢƦơƜ T ƛƧμƜƏμƔƦƔ] ƛƯμƔƦƔ R ƾƢȶ] ƦȮ ƾƢȶ T ƾƟƛʬƟ … ƝƔƣƢʬƟ] ǂƟƛơƧƤ … ƝƔƣƢơʝ R

102

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

238c žƚƟƔƒʪ ŸƜƒ : žƑƟƔƜơƟ ŹȎƕơƒƔƤ ƾƝƣƫƦƑƣƜơƟ ƾƢȶ žƚƟƔƒơƧ Ʀơʝ ǖƞƘƨƮƣơƧ. L Ƈ r(R) 1 sch. 752 ǤƞƛƘƟ ƘǮƤ ƦȲƟ ŹȒƕơƜƔƟ ɓ ƾƝƣƫƦƑƣƜƮƟ ǎƥƦƜ Ʀȶ žƑƟƔƜơƟ; Eust. Il. I 431, 19– 20 ƢƘƣȴ Ʀȶ žƑƟƔƜơƟ, ƦʀƤ ŹȎƕơƒƔƤ ƾƝƣƫƦƑƣƜơƟ 1 lm. deest in R et T, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 238b coniungat (Ʀȶ ƗȰ žƑƟƔƜơƟ); (žƚƟƔƒʪ ŸƜƒ n.) R žƑƟƔƜơƟ] žƑƟƔƜ R žƚƟƔƒơƧ] ƚƟƔƒơƧ R 2 ǖƞƘƨƮƣơƧ] ǖƨƑƣơƧ R; corruptum esse iudicat Papageorgiou: žƞƘơƨƮƣơƧ vel ƇƘƞƘƥƨƮƣơƧ temptavit Nauck 431: ǖƞƘƨƑƟơƣơƤ Zielinski 54

239 ƘȎƝƦƔʎƔ ƨƔƒƟƫƟ Ǡ ŪƢȶ μƔƟƦƘƒƔƤ: ƢƮƦƘƣơƟ ƔȎƦȶƤ ƘȎƠƏμƘƟơƤ ƝƔȴ ȏƢơƥƩƮμƘƟơƤ ǎƢȴ Ʀʁ ƟƒƝɾ ƦơʝƦơ ƢơƜƘʎƟ Ǡ ƾƢȶ μƔƟƦƘƒƔƤ, ƛƘơʝ ƦƜƟơƤ ƝƘƞƘƯƥƔƟƦơƤ; L Ƈ r(R) 1 ƘȎƠƏμƘƟơƤ: cf. Orus fr. ŵ 49 … Ʀȶ ƗȰ ƘȎƝƦƔʎơƟ ǎƟ ƁƮμơƜƤ ƄƞƏƦƫƟơƤ (687e) ǎƢȴ Ʀơʝ ƝƔƦƘƧƖμƐƟơƧ ƝƔȴ ơǵơƟ ƝƔƦŪ ƘȎƩȲƟ ƾƢơƗƜƗơμƐƟơƧ…; Hesych. Ƙ 6945 ƘȎƝƦƔʎơƟ· Ʀȶ ƝƔƦŪ ƘȎƩȲƟ ƾƢơƗƜƗȷμƘƟơƟ 1 lm. deest in TR; (ƘȎƝƦƔʎƔ ƨƔƒƟƫƟ n.) R (lm.) Ǡ] Ǟ L ƔȎƦȶƤ om. R 2 ǎƢȴ] ǎƟ T ƢơƜƘʎƟ] ƢơƜƘʎ T

post ƢƮƦƘƣơƟ add. ƨƚƥȴƟ T

240 ƘȎƩƔʎƤ, ȃƛŪ ɑƣƘƜ : ƝƔƦƘƧƩƔʎƤ ƨƚƥƜƟ ƔȎƦơʝ ƦƘƞƘʎƥƛƔƜ ƦȮƤ ƛƧƥƒƔƤŭ ȃƦƘ ƖȮƣ ǎƝƣƏƦƚƥƘƟ ƃǮƩƔƞƒƔƤ ƘȎƩƔƣƜƥƦƑƣƜơƟ ƦȮƤ ƛƧƥƒƔƤ ƢƣơƥƑƖƔƖƘƟ. L Ƈ r(R) 1 lm. deest in R et Ƈ, quippe qui hoc sch. scholio 239 continuet (ƢƣȶƤ ȁ ǎƢȯƖƘƜ); (ȃƛŪ ɑƣƘƜ n.) R; accuratiss. 240–1 ƘȎƩƔʎƤ – ƖƧƟƔƜƝʬƟ 1 ƝƔƦŪƘȎƩƏƤ – ƛƧƥƒƔƤ] haec ita rescripsit Ƈ: ƢƣȶƤ ȁ ǎƢȯƖƘƜ ƝƔƦŪ ƘȎƩȮƤ ƞȱƖƫƟ ƔȎƦʭ ƦƘƞƘʎ ƦȮƤ ƛƧƥƒƔƤ 1 ƝƔƦƘƧƩƔʎƤ L: ƝƔƦŪ ƘȎƩȮƤ rescripsit Ƈ: ƝƔƦŪ ƘȎƩƔʎƤ R 2 ƘȎƩƔƣƜƥƦƑƣƜơƟ] ƘȎƩƔƣƜƥƦƚƣƒơƧƤ Lascaris, sed ƘȎƩƔƣƜƥƦƑƣƜơƟ pro substantivo accipiendum est

242 (Ʀơʝ ƢơƦŪ ƘǮƥƒ ): ƾƟƦȴ ƦƒƟơƤ ƘǮƥȴ ƗƘƥƢƮƦơƧ; L Ƈs.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris, nisi quod pro ƘǮƥƒ scripsit ƘǮƥƒƟ; (Ʀơʝ s.) L ƾƟƦȴ om. Ƈ

sch. 238c – sch. 246

103

243a ơǮƝƦƣƔȴ ƖƏƣ, ƘǮ μȲ ƠƧμƨơƣƔƒ : ƗƧƥƖƘƟƘʎƤ ƖȮƣ ƗơƝơʝƥƜƟ ƘǴƟƔƜ, ƘǮ μȲ ǂƣƔ μƘ ƥƨƏƞƞơƧƥƜƟ Ɣǯ ƝƔƦŪ ƔȎƦȮƤ ƥƧμƨơƣƔƒ. L Ƈ r(R) 1 lm.] ơǮƝƦƣƔȴ ƖȮƣ Ƈ: deest in R; (ƖƏƣ, ƘǮ μȲ n.) R; accuratiss. v. 243 ơǮƝƦƣƔȴ – ƝƞƐƢƦơƧƥƒ μƘ ƗƧƥƖƘƟƘʎƤ] ƗƧƥƦƧƩƘʎƤ Hermann2 47, at scripturam librorum defendit Wolff 189 (scholiasta ad verba Ʀơʝ ƢơƦŪ ƘǮƥƒ v. 242 spectat)

243b (ƘǮ μȲ – ƝƞƐƢƦơƧƥƒ μƘ): ƦơƧƦƐƥƦƜƟ, ƘǮ μȲ ǂƣƔ ƗƜȮ ƦȲƟ ƦƯƩƚƟ ȏƢƘƗƯƥƔƟƦơ ơǴƝƦơƟ. L Ƈ r(R) 1–2 haec a sch. pr. separavi

1 lm. addidi

2 ơǴƝƦơƟ] ƦȶƟ ơǴƝ. Ƈ

244 ƦƔƯƦƔƤ ǎƝƘʎƟơƤ : dzƟƔ ƦȮƤ μȰƟ ƔȎƦȶƤ ǒƩɾ, ƦȮƤ ƗŪ ƾƟƜƘƣưƥɾ ƦơʎƤ ƛƘơʎƤ. L r(R) 1 lm.] deest in R; (ƦƔƯƦƔƤ n.) R; accuratiss. vv. 244–5 ƦƔƯƦƔƤ ǎƝƘʎƟơƤ … ǎƠƘƒƞƘƛŪ ƔȏƦʭ ƝƦʀμƔ ƝƔȴ ƛƘơʎƤ ƝƣƜƦƮƟ ƦȮƤ (pr.) om. R ƗŪ] ƗȰ R ƾƟƜƘƣưƥɾ] ƾƨƜƘƣưƥɾ R

246 Ǥ ƝƾƢȴ ƦƔƯƦɾ Ʀʁ ƢƮƞƘƜ : DŽƣŪ ơȔƟ ƦȶƟ ƢơƞȸƟ ƦơʝƦơƟ ƝƔȴ ƾƟƏƣƜƛμơƟ ƩƣƮƟơƟ ƦʬƟ ǟμƘƣʬƟ ǎƟ Ʀʁ ƃǮƩƔƞƒɯ ƗƜƐƦƣƜƪƘƟ; ǂƥƝơƢơƟ ƗȰ ƢơƞƯƟ, ȁƟ ơȎƝ ǂƟ ƦƜƤ ǎƢƜƞơƖƒƥƔƜƦơ ƝƔȴ ƝƔƦƔμƏƛơƜ ƗƜȮ ƦȶƟ ƩƣƮƟơƟ. L Ƈ r(R) 1 lm. deest in ƇR; (ƝƾƢȴ ƦƔƯƦɾ n.) R; accuratiss. vv. 246–7 Ǥ ƝƾƢȴ – ƾƟƑƣƜƛμơƟ (scholiastam ƾƟƑƣƜƛμơƟ vel ƾƟƏƣƜƛμơƟ pro ƾƣƒƛμƜơƟ legisse conicias) 1–2 ƝƔȴ ƾƟƏƣƜƛμơƟ ƩƣƮƟơƟ] ƝƔȴ ƾƟƔƣƒƛμƚƦơƟ Ʃƣ. Ƈ: ƩƣƮƟơƟ ƝƔȴ ƾƟƔƣƒƛμƚƦơƟ R 2 ƩƣƮƟơƟ post ƦơʝƦơƟ (1) praebet R ƗƜƐƦƣƜƪƘƟ] ƗƜƔƦƣƒƪƔƜ R ƢơƞȸƟ] ƦȶƟ Ƣ. ƇR 3 ƝƔȴ] serius additum in L ƗƜȮ ƦȶƟ ƩƣƮƟơƟ] ƗƜȮ Ʀȶ μʀƝơƤ Ƈ, quod recepit Brunck1 prob. Nauck 431: ƗƜȮ Ʀȶ ƩƣƮƟƜơƟ vel potius verba haec delenda censet Bernardakis 59, sed ƗƜȮ ƦȶƟ ƩƣƮƟơƟ h.l. ƗƜȮ ƦȶƟ ƢơƞȸƟ ƩƣƮƟơƟ valet

104

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

247 (ƾƟƑƣƜƛμơƟ): ƾƟƦȴ ƾƟƔƣƒƛμƚƦơƟ. Ls.l. 1 Phot. Ɣ 1931 džƟȳƣƜƛμơƟŭ ƾƟƔƣȵƛμƚƦơƟ. ŵǮƥƩȹƞơƤ ƄƣơμƚƛƘʎ (90) 1 lm. add. Lascaris (scholiastam ƾƟƑƣƜƛμơƟ vel ƾƟƏƣƜƛμơƟ pro ƾƣƒƛμƜơƟ legisse conicias)

250a (ǎμƢơƞƚƛƘƒƤ): ƢƣƔƛƘƒƤ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 cf. sch. Ant. 1036 ubi ǎƠƚμƢƮƞƚμƔƜ per ƢƐƢƣƔμƔƜ explicuit; sch. (vetTr) Ar. Pac. 448a dzƟŪ ǎμƢơƞɲ ƕȱƞƦƜơƟ: dzƟƔ ƢƜƢƣȯƥƝɾ ƢƞƘȵơƟơƤ... 1 lm. add. Elmsley

250b Ʀơʝ ƞƮƖơƧ ƗŪ ơȎ ƩƣȲ ƨƛƮƟơƟ : μƐμƪƜƟŭ ơȎ ƩƣƑ, ƨƚƥƒ, μƐμƨƘƥƛƔƜ ơǵƤ ǀƟ ƢƣƏƠɾ ǿ źƘƯƤŭ ǮƗƒʪ ƖȮƣ ƞơƖƜƥμʭ ƢƏƟƦƔ ƢƣƏƦƦƘƜ ȟƤ ƛƐƞƘƜ. Ǡ ơȓƦƫƤ· ơȎ ƩƣȲ ƾƚƗʬƤ ƾƝơƯƘƜƟ ƦȶƟ ƞƮƖơƟ, ȃ ǎƥƦƜƟ ǎƠƘƧƦƘƞƒƙƘƜƟ ƝƔȴ ƪƐƖƘƜƟ. Ǡ ơȎ ƩƣȲ ƢƔƣƔƜƦƘʎƥƛƔƜ ƞƐƖƘƜƟ ƦȮ ƢƔƣȮ ŸƜȶƤ ƖƜƟƮμƘƟƔ ƝǀƟ ɒ 5 ƩƔƞƘƢƏ. L Ƈ r(R) 1 μƐμƪƜƟ: sch. Eur. Hec. 288 ƨƛȷƟơƤ ƟȱμƘƥƜƤ. ƥƚμƘƜƫƦȱơƟ ƗȰ ȃƦƜ ƦȶƟ ƨƛȷƟơƟ ƟʝƟ ǎƢȴ Ʀơʝ μȻμơƧ ƦȵƛƚƥƜƟ, ȟƤ ǎƟ żƚƥƘʎ [fr. 387 Kannicht] «ƝƔȵƦơƜ ƨƛȷƟơƧ μȰƟ μʝƛơƟ ǂƠƜơƟ ƨƣȯƥƫ»; (ad idem lm., i.e. ƨƛƮƟơƤ) ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ μȱμƪƜƤ; id. Phoen. 545 ƨƛƮƟơƟ ǒƩƘƜ: ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ μƐμƪƜƟ; sch. Thuc. VII 77, 4 ƨƛƮƟơƧ: μƐμƪƘƫƤ; Eust. Od. I 65, 36–40; ibid. II 205, 43–4 1 lm.] ƨƛƮƟơƟ R: deest in Ƈ; (ƨƛƮƟơƟ n.) R; accuratiss. 250–1 Ʀơʝ ƞƮƖơƧ – ƨƔƟʁ μƐμƪƜƟ om. Ƈ 3 ǎƠƘƧƦƘƞƒƙƘƜƟ] ƘȎƦƘƞƒƙƘƜƟ Ƈ 3–4 ƝƔȴ ƪƐƖƘƜƟ om. R propter homoeoteleuton 4 ƞƐƖƘƜƟ ] ƝƔȴ μȲ ƞƐƖ. Ƈ ŸƜȶƤ] Ʀơʝ Ÿ. Ƈ

sch. 247 – sch. 257

105

253 (ǎƟƜƔƧƦƮƟ): ǿ ǧƣƮƗƫƣơƤ ƖŪ ǒƦƚ ƞƐƖƘƜ. L Ƈs.l. 1 ǧƣƮƗƫƣơƤ: FGrHist 31 fr. 33 1 lm. add. Lascaris

ǿ om. Ƈ

ǧƣƮƗƫƣơƤ ‘Scribendum ǧƣƮƗƫƣơƤ, ut Brunckius2

edidit, fortasse ex coniectura Valckenarii, qui sic emendavit in exemplari quod ad Hermannum pervenit’ Dindorf 69: ǧƣȷƗơƦơƤ LT ƖŪ L: ƦƣȵƔ Ƈ

254 (ǎƗƑƩƛƚ): ǎƞƧƢƑƛƚ. Ls.l. Ƈs.l. 1 cf. sch. Ph. 378 ƗƚƩƛƘȴƤ] ƞƧƢƚƛƘȵƤ; sch. Ph. 1358 ubi ŪƗƏƝƟƘƜ per ƞƧƢƘʎ explanatur; sch. (vet/Tr) Ar. Vesp. 253; Hesych. Ɨ 131; Lex. Patm. 145, 26; sch. Aesch. Th. 399b ƗƏƝƟơƧƥŪ] ƞƧƢơʝƥƜ; Hesych. Ɨ 904 ƗƑƠơμƔƜŭ ƞƧƢƑƥƫ…; Ɔ Ɨ 140 ƗƑƠơμƔƜŭ ƞƧƢƑƥƫ = Phot. Ɨ 279; Hesych. Ɨ 126 ƗƏƝƘŭ ǎƞƯƢƚƥƘ (Ź 493); sch. Eur. Phoen. 383; Hesych. Ɨ 147; sch. (vet) Ar. Ach. 1b (i) … ‘ƗƐƗƚƖμƔƜŪ ƗȰ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ … ƞƘƞƯƢƚμƔƜ unde Su. Ɨ 142 1 lm. add. Elmsley

256 ƦȶƟ ƾƖƩƜƥƦʀƣƔ ƦơʝƗƘ Ʀơʝ ƢƏƛơƧƤ : ƦȶƟ ƔDzƦƜơƟ ƝƔȴ ƥƩƘƗȶƟ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƢơƜƑƥƔƟƦƔ Ʀơʝ ƢƏƛơƧƤŭ ƞƐƖƘƜ ƗȰ ƦȶƟ ŹȒƣƧƦơƟ. L T r(R) 1 Eudem. Rhet. 5, 11–3 ƾƖƩƜƥƦȳƣ, ǿ ƝơƜƟƫƟȶƤ ƦơʝƗƘ Ʀơʝ ƢƣȯƖμƔƦơƤ. ǿ ƥƩƘƗȶƟ ƔȎƦȶƤ ƢơƜȳƥƔƤ ȟƤ ƆơƨơƝƞʀƤ «Ǥ μȲƟ ƦȶƟ ƾƖƩƜƥƦʀƣƔ ƦơʝƗƘ Ʀơʝ ƢȯƛơƧƤ». 1 lm.] ƦȶƟ ƾƖƩƜƥƦʀƣƔ Ƈ: deest in R; (Ǥ μȲƟ ƦȶƟ n.) R ƝƔȴ ƥƩƘƗȶƟ ƔȎƦȶƟ] ƔȎƦȶƟ ƥƩƘƗȶƟ R ƥƩƘƗȶƟ] ƢƞƚƥƒơƟ Ƈ 2 Ʀơʝ ƢƏƛơƧƤ] Ʀȶ ƢƏƛơƤ a (coni. Lascaris prob. Nauck 431 ‘si genuinus est verborum ordo’): Ʀơʝ ƢƏƛơƧƤ vel Ʀơʝ ƢƏƛơƧƤ Berrnardakis 59; sed Ʀơʝ ƢƏƛơƧƤ liberius ad ƦȶƟ ƔDzƦƜơƟ (1) adnecti potest

257 (ǒƦƜ): ƢƞƘơƟƏƙƘƜ Ʀȶ ǒƦƜ. L 1 lm. addidi

106

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

258a (ǟƞƒƫƥƘ ƦơȔƢơƤ): ǎμƔƦƔƒƫƥƘƟ, μƏƦƔƜơƟ ƘǴƢƘƟ Ʀȶ ǒƢơƤ. Ls.l. Ƈ r(R) 1 cf. sch. Od. 5.104 ơȒƦƘ ƢƔƣƘƠƘƞƛƘʎƟ ơȒƛŪ ƿƞƜʬƥƔƜ] ơȒƦƘ μȯƦƔƜơƟ ǟƖȳƥƔƥƛƔƜ, ơȒƦƘ ƢƔƣƘƠƘƞƛƘʎƟ ƝƔȴ ƾƢƘƜƛʀƥƔƜ. ƿƞƜʬƥƔƜ, μƔƦƔƜʬƥƔƜ; Apoll. S. 23, 21; Hesych. Ɣ 3083; Eust. Od. I 203, 14 ƿƞƜʬƥƔƜ ƗȰ Ʀȶ ƢƔƟƦƘƞʬƤ μƔƦƔƜʬƥƔƜ ƝƔȴ ƾƨƘʎƟƔƜ ƗƜƘƝƢƘƥƘʎƟ ǂƢƣƔƝƦơƟ; Zonar. 137, 10 LJƞȵƫƥƘƟ. ǎμƔƦƔȵƫƥƘƟ; sch. D Hom. Il. 16. 737 ƿƞƒƫƥƘ: μƔƦƔƒƫƤ ǎƢơƒƚƥƘƟ unde Su. Ɣ 1238; sch. OC 1469 ǃƞƜơƟ] μƏƦƔƜơƟ; sch. Ph. 840 ubi ƿƞƒƫƤ per μƏƦƚƟ explanatur 1 lm. add. Papageorgiou: ơȎƝ ǞƞȵƫƥƘƟ (spiritu leni, ut apud poetam) Ƈ: deest in LR; (ǟƞƒƫƥƘ n.) R ǎμƔƦƔƒƫƥƘƟ] ơȎƝ ǎμ. Ƈ (vide lm. Ƈ) μƏƦƔƜơƟ] ơȎ μ. Ƈ (vide lm. Ƈ)

258b ƾƞƞŪ ǿƛŪ ƿƖƟȶƤ ǤƟ : ȃƦƘ ǣƖƟƜƥƘƟ ƔȏƦȶƟ ƾƢȶ Ʀơʝ ƨƮƟơƧ, ȃ ǎƥƦƜƟ ȃƦƘ ǎƢƞƑƣƫƥƘ ƦȲƟ ȏƢȰƣ Ʀơʝ ƨƮƟơƧ ƗơƧƞƘƒƔƟ. L Ƈ r(R) 1 lm. deest in R et Ƈ, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 258a coniungat (ƾƞƞŪ ȃƦƘ); (ƾƞƞŪ ǣƖƟƜƥƘƟ ƔȏƦȶƟ scripsi coll. sch. 287.2: ǣƖƟƜƥƘƟ ǏƔƧƦȶƟ a: ǣƖƟƜƥƘƟ LR (ǣƖƟƝƘƟ dedit Papageorgiou) et Ƈ: ǢƖƟƜƥƘƟ R: ǟƖƟƒƥƛƚ Lascaris: an ǣƖƟƘƧƥƘƟ? 2 ante ǎƢƞƑƣƫƥƘ add. ǢƖƟƜƥƘ ƝƔȴ R ȏƢȰƣ] ƾƢȶ R post ƗơƧƞƘƒƔƟ add. ƝƔȴ ƦȮ ǏƠʀƤ Ƈ

ǿƛŪ n.) R

259 (ǎƢƔƝƦƮƟ): ƥƧμμƔƩƜƝƮƟ, ơȎƝ DzƗƜơƟ. L Ts.l. sch. in Aesch. Th. 583b ǎƢƔƝƦȶƟ] ƾƞƞƮƦƣƜơƟ; ibid. 583c ǎƢƔƝƦȶƟ] ƠƐƟơƟ, ƾƞƞƮƦƣƜơƟ; ibid. 583d ǎƢƔƝƦȶƟ] ǎƢƘƒƥƔƝƦơƟ; sch. Eur. Hipp. 318 ubi ǎƢƔƝƦƑ per ǟ ǒƠƫƛƘƟ ǎƢƔƖơμƐƟƚ explicatur; sch. Thuc. VI 20, 4 ǎƢƔƝƦʭ: ƠƐƟʪ; Ɔ Ƙ 564 ǎƢƔƝƦƮƟ: ǎƢƔƖƮμƘƟơƟ, ƠƐƟơƟ… = Phot. Ƙ 1329 = Su. Ƙ 1932 (unde Zonar. 808, 10); aliter sch. 491a1 1 lm. add. Elmsley; (ǎƢƔƝƦƮƟ s.) L

post ƥƧμμƔƩƜƝƮƟ add. ƝƔȴ Ƈ

259–60 (ƢƮƞƜƟ | ƦȲƟ ŹȎƣƧƦƘƒƔƟ): ƦȲƟ ƃǮƩƔƞƒƔƟ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Papageorgiou

107

sch. 258a – sch. 265

263 ƠƐƟơƟ : ƨƒƞơƟ. L Ƈs.l. 1 cf. sch. Aesch. Th. 727b ƠƐƟơƤ] ƨƒƞơƤ; sch. Eur. Hec. 26; sch. D Hom. Il. 6.215; Apion 96, 3 L.; sch. Pi. O. 4.7a, c; sch. Ap. Rh. 26, 1; sch. Theocr. II 161–2d; sch. Thuc. IV 78, 4; Hesych. Ơ 30; Su. Ơ 45 1 hoc sch. ad v. 263 rettulit Ƈ (ut iam Papageorgiou): ad ǎƨȱƥƦƜơƟ (v. 262) rettulit L qui ƠƐƟơƟ ut partem scholii praebet lm. deest in Ƈ

264a ǎƢƘƣƣƮƛƚƥƘ : ƥƨơƗƣʬƤ ȓƕƣƜƥƘƟ Ǡ ƘǮƤ ƦȲƟ ƢƔƜƗơƝƦơƟƒƔƟ ƦʬƟ ƾƢȶ ƀƘƖƏƣƔƤ ƦƐƝƟƫƟ Ǡ ȃƦƜ ƢơƞƞƔʎƤ ƢƣưƚƟ ȟμƒƞƚƥƘƟ ƖƧƟƔƜƠȴƟ ȟƤ džƢơƞƞƮƗƫƣơƤ. L Ƈ r(R) 1–3 haec Herodoro haesitans tribuit Jacoby, FGrHist 31 fr. dub. 66, Wilamowitz secutus qui džƢơƞƞƮƗƫƣơƤ (3) in ǧƣƮƗƫƣơƤ mutaverat 1 ȓƕƣƜƥƘƟ: cf. sch. Ant. 413 ǎƢƜƣƣƮƛơƜƤ] ƞơƜƗƮƣơƜƤ, ȏƕƣƜƥƦƜƝơʎƤ; sch. Ant. 290 ǎƣƣƮƛơƧƟ] ȓƕƣƜƙơƟ; Hesych. Ƙ 5131 ǎƢƜƣƣƮƛƚƦƔŭ ǎƢƒƪơƖƔ = Phot. Ƙ 1681 ƢƔƜƗơƝƦơƟƒƔƟ: cf. Apollod. II 128 ƾƨƜƝȷμƘƟơƤ ơȔƟ ƘǮƤ ƃǮƩƔƞȵƔƟ ... ơȎƝ ǒƦƧƩƘ Ʀơʝ ƖȯμơƧ, ... ŹȎƣȹƦơƧ ƗȰ ƝƔȴ ƦʬƟ ƞơƜƢʬƟ ƾƢƔƖơƣƘƧȷƟƦƫƟ ƝƔȴ ƗƘƗơƜƝȱƟƔƜ ƞƘƖȷƟƦƫƟ μȲ ƦƘƝƟơƢơƜƚƥȯμƘƟơƤ ƦȮ ƖƘƟƟƚƛƚƥȷμƘƟƔ ƢȯƞƜƟ ƾƢơƝƦƘȵƟɾ. 2 ƢơƞƞƔʎƤ … ƖƧƟƔƜƠȴƟ cf. sch. 460 1 lm.] ǎƢƘƣƣƮƛƚƥƘƟ L: ǎƢƘƣƣƮƛƚƥƚƥƘƟ (sic) Ta: deest in R; (ǎƢƘƣƮƛƚƥƘ n.) R ante ƥƨơƗƣʬƤ add. ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ R 2 ȟƤ] ȟƤ ƨƚƥȴƟ Ƈ 3 džƢơƞƞƮƗƫƣơƤ] ǧƣƮƗƫƣơƤ Wilamowitz (vide supra 1–3)

264b (ƾƦƚƣɲ ƨƣƘƟƒ ): ƾƢƚƟƘʎ ƝƔȴ ƥƝƞƚƣɲ ƖƟưμɾ. L; cf. gll. in Ƈs.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris; (ƾƦƚƣɲ s.) L ƨƣƘƟƒ nec plura T

1 ƾƢƚƟƘʎ – fin.] ƾƢƚƟƘʎ gl. ad ƾƦƚƣɲ, ƖƟưμɾ gl. ad

265 ƞƐƖƫƟ ƩƘƣơʎƟ μƐƟ : ƞƐƖƫƟ ƔȎƦȶƟ ǟƦƦɱƥƛƔƜ ƦʬƟ ƔȎƦơʝ ƦƐƝƟƫƟ, ƘǮ ƝƔȴ ǂƨƧƝƦƔ ƕƐƞƚ ǒƩƘƜ. L Ƈs.l. r(R) 1 lm. deest in TR; accuratiss. vv. 265–6 ƞƐƖƫƟ – ƝƣƒƥƜƟ ƦƐƝƟƫƟ] ƦƐƝ. ƔȎƦ. Ƈ

ƞƐƖƫƟ om. T

ƔȎƦơʝ

108

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

266 ƦʬƟ ȥƟ ƦƐƝƟƫƟ ƞƒƢơƜƦơ : ƦơʝƦơ ǮƗƒƫƤŭ ơȎ ƖȮƣ ǞƞƔƙơƟƘƯƥƔƦơ μƮƟơƟ ƢƘƣȴ ƦʬƟ ƢƔƒƗƫƟ ǏƔƧƦơʝ ƾƞƞȮ ƝƔȴ ƗʬƣơƟ ƦơƠƘƒƔƤ ƢƣơƛƘȴƤ ƦȲƟ ǶƮƞƚƟ ƟƜƝƑƥƔƟƦƜ ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ ơȎƝ ǞƖƖƯƚƥƘƟ. ƗƜƔƨƫƟƘʎƦƔƜ ƗȰ ǿ ƦʬƟ ŹȎƣƧƦƜƗʬƟ ƾƣƜƛμƮƤ. ǧƥƒơƗơƤ μȰƟ ƖȮƣ ƗŪ ƨƚƥƜƟ ǎƠ ŹȎƣƯƦơƧ ƝƔȴ džƟƦƜƮƩƚƤ ƢƔʎƗƔƤ, 5 ơȓƦƫƤŭ

10

ǟ ƗŪ ȏƢơƝƧƥƔμƐƟƚ ƝƔƞƞƒƙƫƟơƤ ƆƦƣƔƦơƟƒƝƚ ŹȒƣƧƦơƟ ǎƟ μƘƖƏƣơƜƥƜƟ ǎƖƘƒƟƔƦơ ƨƒƞƦƔƦơƟ ƧǯƮƟŭ Ʀơʝ ƗŪ ƧǯƘʎƤ ǎƖƐƟơƟƦơ ŸƚƒƫƟ žƞƧƦƒơƤ ƦƘ ƇơƠƘƯƤ ƦŪ ƾƟƦƒƛƘơƤ ǞƗŪ ǺƨƜƦơƤ ȂƙơƤ NJƣƚơƤŭ ƦơȸƤ ƗȰ μƐƛŪ ǿƢƞơƦƏƦƚƟ ƦƐƝƘƦơ ƠƔƟƛȲƟ ǶƮƞƘƜƔƟ džƟƦƜƮƩƚ ƝƣƘƒơƧƥƔ ƢƔƞƔƜȶƟ ƖƐƟơƤ ƁƔƧƕơƞƒƗƔơ žƣƘƮƨƧƞơƤ ƗȰ ƕŪ, džƣƜƥƦơƝƣƏƦƚƤ ƗȰ ƖŪ, ƇơƠƐƔ, žƞƧƦƒơƟ, ŸƚƒơƟƔ. L Ƈ r(R) 2 ƾƞƞȮ – 3 ǞƖƖƯƚƥƘƟ: cf. Apollod. II 128 ƾƨƜƝȷμƘƟơƤ ơȔƟ ƘǮƤ ƃǮƩƔƞȵƔƟ (scil. ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ) ƝƔȴ Ʀʁ ƦơƠƜƝʁ ƝƣƘȵƦƦƫƟ ƔȎƦʬƟ ƖƘƟȷμƘƟơƤ ơȎƝ ǒƦƧƩƘ Ʀơʝ ƖȯμơƧ… 6 Hes. fr. 26.27–31 et 31a M.-W. 8 pro Deione Molionem nominavit Diod. Sic. IV.37.5 ƝƔȴ ƦơȸƤ ŹȎƣȹƦơƧ ƢƔʎƗƔƤ ƾƢȱƝƦƘƜƟƘ (scil. ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ), ƇơƠȱƔ ƝƔȴ ƀơƞȵơƟƔ ƝƔȴ žƞƧƦȵơƟ 12 žƣƘƮƨƧƞơƤ: Oech. Hal. fr. 3 Bernabé = Oech. Hal. fr. 3 Davies džƣƜƥƦơƝƣƏƦƚƤ: FGrHist 591 fr. dub. 6 1 lm. deest in TR; (ȥƟ ƦƐƝƟƫƟ n.) R; accuratiss. ƦʬƟ ȥƟ – ƝƣƒƥƜƟ ǞƞƔƙơƟƘƯƥƔƦơ] ǞƞƔƙơƟƘƯƘƦơ R μƮƟơƟ] μƮƟƫƟ R 2 ƢƔƒƗƫƟ ǏƔƧƦơʝ] ǏƔƧƦơʝ ƢƔƒƗƫƟ Ƈ ƗʬƣơƟ] ƗưƣƫƟ R 3 ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ] Ʀʭ ǧƣ. TR ǞƖƖƯƚƥƘƟ] ǞƖƖƯƘƧƥƘ R ƗƜƔƨƫƟƘʎƦƔƜ] ƗƜƔƨƔƟƘʎƦƔƜ R ŹȎƣƧƦƜƗʬƟ] -ƦƒƗƫƟ (hoc accentu) TR 4 μȰƟ] μȰƟ μȰƟ sic R ƗŪ ƦƐƥƥƔƣƔƤ TR džƟƦƜƮƩƚƤ] džƟƦƜƮƢƚƤ Bentley 6 ǟ ƗŪ] ơȎƗŪ R ȏƢơƝƧƥƔμƐƟƚ T (coni. iam Dindorf 69): ȏƢơƝƧƥƥƔμƐƟƚ L 7 post ǎƖƘƒƟƔƦơ add. ơǯ T ƨƒƞƦƔƦơƟ] ƨƒƞơƟ T 8 ǎƖƐƟơƟƦơ TLp (Lascaris): ƖƐƟơƟƦơ L ŸƚƒƫƟ Lp.c.: ǶƗƚƑƫƟ La.c.: ŸƜơƒƫƟ T: ƀơƞƒƫƟ Hermann 60 coll. Diod. Sic. IV.37.5 (vide supra) prob. Dindorf 69 žƞƧƦƒơƤ] žƞƯƦƜơƤ (vide 12) T ƦƘ om. TR 9 ǞƗŪ] ƘǮ ƗŪ Ƈ 11 džƟƦƜƮƩƚ – ƁƔƧƕơƞƒƗƔơ om. R ƁƔƧƕơƞƒƗƔơ] ŵȎƕơƞƒƗƔơ T 12 žƣƘƮƨƧƞơƤ L: žƣƘưƨƧƞơƤ Brunck1: om. T ƗȰ ƕŪ om. T ƖŪ] ƦƣƘʎƤ T: ƗƯơ R ƇơƠƐƔ] ƇơƟƐƔ T žƞƧƦƒơƟ] žƞƯƦƜơƟ T (vide 8) ŸƚƜƮƟƔ L: ŸƜƚƮƟƔ T

267–8 (ƾƟƗƣȶƤ ȟƤ ǎƞƘƧƛƐƣơƧ … | ʜƔƒơƜƦơ): ƞƘƒƢƘƜ ǟ ȏƢƮ, ȟƤ ȏƢȶ ǎƞƘƧƛƐƣơƧ ƾƟƗƣȶƤ ȏƕƣƒƙơƜƦơ. ƞƐƖƘƜ ƗȰ Ʀơʝ ŹȎƣƧƥƛƐƫƤ. L; cf. gl. in Ts.l 2 ȏƕƣƒƙơƜƦơ: cf. Hesych. ƣ 62 ʜƔƒơƜƦơŭ ƨƛƘƒƣơƜƦơ, ƢƞƔƟʭƦơ et Phot. 480, 17 ʣƔȵơƜƦơ: ƨƛƘȵƣơƜƦơ qui tamen Homeri locum Od. 9.459 (Ʀʬ ƝƐ ơǯ ǎƖƝƐƨƔƞƮƤ ƖƘ ƗƜȮ ƥƢƐơƤ ǂƞƞƧƗƜƤ ǂƞƞɾ | ƛƘƜƟơμƐƟơƧ ʜƔƒơƜƦơ ƢƣȶƤ ơȒƗƘƬ) respiciunt

sch. 266 – sch. 272–3

109

1 lm. addidi ƞƘƒƢƘƜ – fin.] ȏƢȶ gl. ad ȟƤ T, ƞƐƖƘƜ ƗȰ ƦȶƟ ŹȎƣƧƥƛƐƔ gl. ad ǎƞƘƧƛƐƣơƧ T nec plura Ƈ

269a (ǒƣƣƜƪƘƟ ǎƝƦȶƤ ƔȎƦƮƟ): ƦʀƤ ơǮƝƒƔƤ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƾƢƘưƥƔƦơ. L Ƈs.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris

ƾƢƘưƥƔƦơ] ƾƢưƥƔƦơ Ƈ

269b ȥƟ ǒƩƫƟ ƩƮƞơƟ: ȏƢȰƣ ƗȲ ƦơƯƦƫƟ ǾƣƖƜƙƮμƘƟơƤ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ ǎƨƮƟƘƧƥƘ ƦȶƟ ǺƨƜƦơƟ ƘǮƤ Ʀȶ ƦʀƤ ƇƜƣƧƟƛƒƔƤ ȂƣơƤ ƢƔƣƔƖƘƖơƟƮƦƔ ƗƜȮ ƦȲƟ ƦʬƟ dzƢƢƫƟ ƾƟƔƙƑƦƚƥƜƟ. L Ƈ r(R) 1 lm. deest in TR; (ƔȎƦȶƟ n.) R; accuratiss. vv. 269–73 ȥƟ ǒƩƫƟ – ƢƞƔƝƮƤ ȏƢȰƣ] ȃƦƜ R ƗȲ om. T ƦơʝƦƫƟ ǾƣƖƜƙƮμƘƟơƤ om. R post ƦơƯƦƫƟ add. ƨƚƥȴƟ T ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ] ǿ ǧƣ. T et R qui hoc vocabulum post ǎƨƮƟƘƧƥƘ transposuit 2 Ʀȶ ... ȂƣơƤ] ƦȮ ... Ȃƣƚ T ƢƔƣƔƖƘƖơƟƮƦƔ] ƢƔƣƔƖƘƟƮμƘƟơƟ T

272 (ƦƮƦŪ ): Ʀȶ ƦƚƟƜƝƔʝƦƔ. Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley (nisi quod pro ƦƮƦŪ scripsit ƦƮƦƘ) ad ƦƮƦŪ rettulit sch. Elmsley: ad ƛǞƦȱƣɯ adscriptum est in L, sed ƛǞƦƐƣɯ per ƾƞƞƔƩƮƥƘ explicatur in sch. 272–3.1

272–3 ƛǞƦƐƣɯ ƗȰ ƟơʝƟ – ƢƞƔƝƮƤ : ƾƞƞƔƩƮƥƘ ƦȶƟ ƟơʝƟ ǒƩơƟƦƔ ƝƔȴ ơȎ ƗƘƜƟȶƟ ƢƘƒƥƘƥƛƔƜ ƢƣơƥƗơƝʬƟƦƔ ƾƢȶ Ʀơʝ ȂƣơƧƤ ǎƗƒƥƝƘƧƥƘƟ. L Ts.l. r(R) 1 lm. scripsi: ƦƮƦŪ ǂƞƞơƥŪ ƔȎƦȶƟ ȂμμƔ L: deest in ƇR; (ǂƞƞơƥŪ ƔȎƦȶƟ n.) R; ex ǎƗƒƥƝƘƧƥƘƟ scholiastam ǒƗƜƝƘ pro ǥƝƘ legisse collegit Meineke 292 ƾƞƞƔƩƮƥƘ] ƾƞƞƔƩơʝ Ƈ 1–2 ơȎ ƗƘƜƟȶƟ LT (ơȎ cum ƢƣơƥƗơƝʬƟƦƔ coniunge): ơȎƗȰƟ Lp: ơȎƗȰƟ ƗƘƜƟȶƟ Valckenaer ad Eur. Phoen. 1427 (in: Euripides tragoediae Phoenissae, Franequerae 1755; usus sum editione Lugduni Batavorum 1802); probat Heath 81 1 post ơȎ add. ƗƚƞơƟƮƦƜ R 2 ƾƢȶ – ǎƗƒƥƝƘƧƥƘƟ] haec separatim ut gl. supra v. 273 leguntur retractata in T ita: ƾƢȶ ȏƪƚƞơʝ ȂƣơƧƤ ǒƣƣƜƪƘƟ, ǎƗȵƥƝƘƧƥƘƟ ǎƗƒƥƝƘƧƥƘƟ] ǎƗƒƥƝƘƧƘƟ R

110

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

273 (ƢƧƣƖưƗơƧƤ ƢƞƔƝƮƤ): ȏƪƚƞơʝ ȂƣơƧƤ. Ls.l. 1 cf. sch. OT. 1103 ƢƞƏƝƘƤ] Ɣǯ ǎƠơƩƔƒ, Ɣǯ ƾƟƔƦƏƥƘƜƤ ƦʬƟ ǾƣʬƟ; Hesych. Ƣ 2457 ƢƞƏƠŭ … ƝƔȴ ȂƣơƤ (cf. Soph. Tr. 273) ... 1 lm. add. Elmsley

274 (ǒƣƖơƧ): Ʀơʝ ƨƮƟơƧ. L 1 lm. add. Brunck2

276 ơȎƗŪ ǞƟƐƥƩƘƦơ : ơȎƩ ȏƢƑƟƘƖƝƘƟ ƔȎƦơʝ ƦȲƟ μƜƔƜƨơƟƒƔƟ, ȃƦƜ ƦȮƤ ǂƞƞƔƤ ƔȎƦơʝ ƥƘμƟȮƤ ƢƣƏƠƘƜƤ ƗƜȮ ƦƔƯƦƚƤ ƝƔƦɿƥƩƧƟƘƟ. L Ƈ 1 ȏƢƑƟƘƖƝƘƟ: cf. Hesych. Ɣ 4900 ƾƟƐƠƘƦƔƜŭ ȏƢơμƘƟƘʎ (Eur. Med. 38)… 1 lm. accuratiss. vv. 276–8 ơȎƗŪ ǞƟƐƥƩƘƦơ – ǒƝƦƘƜƟƘƟ post ȏƢƑƟƘƖƝƘƟ add. ƨƚƥȴƟ T ƔȎƦơʝ L (ƔȏƦơʝ dedit Papageorgiou) et T 2 ƥƘμƟȮƤ om. T

280a ȓƕƣƜƟ ƖȮƣ ơȎ ƥƦƐƣƖơƧƥƜƟ : ƦȲƟ ƾƗƜƝƒƔƟ. L r(R) 1 lm. deest in R; (ƢƣƔƦƮƟ ƟƜƟ v. 276 n.) R post ƾƗƜƝƒƔƟ add. ƗƚƞơƟƮƦƜ R

280b (ȓƕƣƜƟ – ƗƔƒμơƟƘƤ): ơǵơƟ ơȎƗŪ ƔȎƦȶ Ʀȶ ƛƘʎơƟ ȏƕƣƜƙƮμƘƟơƟ ƝƔƣƦƘƣƘʎ ȁ ƞƒƔƟ ǎƥƦȴƟ ƾƟƘƝƦƜƝưƦƔƦơƟ. L Ƈ r(R) 1–2 haec sch. novum sunt in T: cum sch. 280a coniunguntur in LR 1 lm. addidi ơȎƗŪ] ơȎƗȰ R ȏƕƣƜƙƮμƘƟơƟ] ǾƣƖƜƙƮμƘƟơƟ R 2 ƾƟƘƝƦƜƝưƦƔƦơƟ a: ƾƟƘƝƦƮƦƔƦơƟ L: ƾƟƘƝƦưƦƔƦơƟ R: ƾƟƘƩƮμƘƟơƟ T

111

sch. 273 – sch. 286a

281a ƝƘʎƟơƜ ƗȰ ȏƢƘƣƩƞƒơƟƦƘƤ : ơǯ ƢƔʎƗƘƤ Ʀơʝ ŹȎƣƯƦơƧ ȏƢƘƣƚƨƏƟƫƤ ƞơƜƗơƣƚƥƏμƘƟơƜ Ʀʭ ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ ƾƟɾƣƐƛƚƥƔƟ. L Ƈ r(R) 1 lm. deest in R et T, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 280b conectat (ȏƢƘƣƩƞƜƗʬƟƦƘƤ (ut apud poetam) ƗȰ ƦơƧƦȱƥƦƜƟ); (ȓƕƣƜƟ n.) R; accuratiss. vv. 281–2 ƝƘʎƟơƜ – ơǮƝƑƦơƣƘƤ 2 ƞơƜƗơƣƚƥƏμƘƟơƜ] ƞơƜƗƫƣƚƥƏμƘƟơƜ R ƾƟɾƣƐƛƚƥƔƟ] ƾƟƑƣƛƚƥƔƟ R

281b (ȏƢƘƣƩƞƒơƟƦƘƤ – ƝƔƝʀƤ): ȏƢƘƣƘƟƦƣƧƨƑƥƔƟƦƘƤ Ʀʁ ƝƔƛŪ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ ƞơƜƗơƣƒɯ. L Ƈ r(R) 1 ȏƢƘƣƘƟƦƣƧƨƑƥƔƟƦƘƤ: cf. sch. Aesch. Ch. 137 ] ƦƣƧƨʬƥƜƟ; id. Suppl. 236 ] ƦƣƧƨʬƟƦƔ; Hesych. Ƙ 349 ǎƖƩƞƒƘƜŭ ǎƟƦƣƧƨɲ 1–2 haec a sch. pr. seiunxi

1 lm. addidi

284 ǂƙƚƞơƟ : ƝƔƝơƗƔƒμơƟƔ, ȁƟ ơȎƝ ǂƟ ƦƜƤ ƙƚƞưƥƘƜƘƟŭ ȋμƚƣơƤ ƾμƐƖƔƣƦƘ ƥƧƕʬƦƔ. L Ƈs.l. r(R) 1 ȁƟ ơȎƝ ǂƟ ƦƜƤ ƙƚƞưƥƘƜƘƟ: cf. sch. 745; Su. Ɣ 590 NJƙƚƞơƟ: ȁ ơȎƝ ǂƟ ƦƜƤ ƙƚƞȻƥƘƜ. ǂƙƚƞơƟ ơȓƦƫƤ ǒƣƖơƟ ǎƣƖȯƥƛƔƜ μƘ ƨɿƤ. ƝƔȴ NJƙƚƞơƤ ƕȵơƤ ǿ ƘȎƦƘƞȳƤ. ǎƠ ǾƞƕȵƫƟ ǂƙƚƞơƟ ƘȏƣơʝƥƔƜ ƕȵơƟ, ƩƫƣơʝƥƜ ƢƣȶƤ ƥȱ. ȋμƚƣơƤ: Od. 17.219, 21.362 1 lm. deest in TR; (ǾƞƕƒƫƟ ǂƙƚƞơƟ n.) R ƝƔƝơƗƔƒμơƟƔ, ȁƟ] ƝƔƝơƗƔƒμƫƟ ȢƟ R

286a (ǎƨƘʎƦ' ): ǎƟƘƦƘƒƞƔƦơ. L Ƈs.l. 1 cf. e.g. Hesych. Ƙ 7372 ǎƨƘʎƦơ· ǎƟƘƦƘȵƞƔƦơ [ǎƟƘƦȱƞƞƘƦơ] = Phot. Ƙ 2397; Su. Ƙ 3887 ǖƨƘʎƦơ: ǎƟƘƦȱƞƞƘƦơ... 1 lm. add. Lascaris, nisi quod pro ǎƨƘʎƦ' scripsit ǎƨƘʎƦơ ǎƝȱƞƘƧƘƟ T

ante ǎƟƘƦƘƒƞƔƦơ add.

112

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

286b (ƦƘƞʬ ): ȟƤ ƢƣơƥƘƦƏƖƚƟ. L 1 lm. addidi in initio scholii subaudi ƦƘƞʬ

287 ƔȎƦȶƟ ƗŪ ǎƝƘʎƟơƟ: Ʀȶ ǏƠʀƤŭ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƨƣƮƟƘƜ ǣƠơƟƦƔ, ƦơƧƦƐƥƦƜ ƢƣơƥƗƮƝƔ, ȃƦƔƟ ƗƜȮ ƦʀƤ ƛƧƥƒƔƤ ƝƔƛƏƣɾ ƔȏƦȶƟ ƾƢȶ Ʀơʝ ƨƮƟơƧ. L Ƈ r(R) 2 ȃƦƔƟ – fin.] haec continere falsam verborum ƿƖƟȮ ƛƯμƔƦƔ interpretationem vidit Kruytbosch 44 1 lm. deest in TR; accuratiss. vv. 287–9 ƔȎƦȶƟ – ǣƠơƟƦƔ Ʀȶ ǏƠʀƤ ơm. T ƢƣơƥƗƮƝƔ add. ƔȎƦȶƟ ǣƠơƟƦƔ T ƝƔƛƏƣɾ] ƝƔƛƔƣʀ R ƔȏƦȶƟ] ǏƔƧƦȶƟ T

2 post

289 (ƦơʝƦơ): Ʀȶ ǣƠƘƜƟ ǎƝƘʎƟơƟ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Kruytbosch 44

291 ƟʝƟ [ƥơƜ ƦƐƣƪƜƤ]: ƾƟƦȴ ǎƟ ƦơƯƦʪ Ʀʭ ƩƣƮƟʪ ƝƔƛŪ ȁƟ ƾƢƔƖƖƐƞƞƫ ƦȮ ƩƣƚƥƦƏ. Ǡ ƝƔƦȮ ƦơʝƦơƟ ƦȶƟ ƦƣƮƢơƟ. L Ƈ 1 lm. codd. decurtavi ƾƟƦȴ] ǢƖơƧƟ T ǎƟ ƦơƯƦʪ Ʀʭ ƩƣƮƟʪ] ǎƟ Ʀʭ ƟʝƟ ƩƣƮƟʪ T ƾƢƔƖƖƐƞƞƫ LT: ƾƢƔƖƖƐƞƞƘƜ Lascaris, sed grammaticus versus 291–2 Lichae continuavisse videtur

294 (ƢƔƟƗƒƝʪ ƨƣƘƟƒ ): ƾƟƦȴ μƘƦȮ ƢƏƥƚƤ ƗƜƝƔƜơƥƯƟƚƤ. Ls.l. r(R) 1 lm. add. Elmsley; (ƢƣɱƠƜƟ ƦƑƟƗƘ n.) R

ƾƟƦȴ] ƾƟ. Ʀơʝ R

sch. 286b – sch. 305

113

296 ȃμƫƤ ƗŪ ǒƟƘƥƦƜ : ƖƟƫμơƞơƖƘʎ ǿƣʬƥƔ ƦȮƤ ƔǮƩμƔƞưƦơƧƤŭ

ƝƔȴ ƦơʝƦơ ƦơȔƢoƤ ǎƥƦȴƟ ƾƟƗƣȶƤ ƘȒƨƣơƟơƤ, ȃƦƔƟ ƝƔƞʬƤ ƢƣƏƥƥɾ ƦƜƤ, ǎƞƢƒƙƘƜƟ ƝƔƝƏ. L T r(R) 2–3 fr. adesp. 460 Kannicht-Snell 1 lm. deest in TR; accuratiss. vv. 296–7 ȃμƫƤ – ƢơƦƘ 2 post ƝƔȴ add. ƨƚƥȴ T ƦơȔƢơƤ om. T ǎƥƦƜƟ compendiose in L ƘȒƨƣơƟơƤ LTa: ǒμƨƣơƟơƤ T 3 ƝƔƞʬƤ ƢƣƏƥƥɾ] ƝƔƞʁ ƢƣƏƠƘƜ R ƦƜƤ om. T ǎƞƢƒƙƘƜƟ] ǎƞƢƒƙƘƜ R post ǎƞƢƒƙƘƜƟ add. ƝƔȴ T

303 Ȥ źƘʝ ƦƣơƢƔʎƘ : ƾƢơƦƣƘƢƦƜƝƐ, ƾƞƘƠƒƝƔƝƘŭ ǯƝƘƦƘƯƘƜ ƗȰ μȲ ƢƔƛƘʎƟ ƢƔƣƔƢƞƑƥƜƔ ƦƔʎƤ ƔǮƩμƔƞưƦƜƥƜ ƦȮ ƦƐƝƟƔ ƔȏƦʀƤ. L T r(R) 1 lm. deest in TR; (ƦƣơƢƔʎƘ n.) R; accuratiss. vv. 303–4 Ȥ źƘʝ – ƩƫƣƑƥƔƟƦƏ ƢơƜ ante ƾƢơƦƣƘƢƦƜƝƐ add. ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ R ƾƢơƦƣƘƢƦƜƝƐ, ƾƞƘƠƒƝƔƝƘ] ƾƢơƦƣȷƢƔƜƘ, ƾƞƘƠƒƝƔƝƘ gll. ad ƦƣơƢƔʎƘ T post ǯƝƘƦƘƯƘƜ add. ƦȶƟ ŸƒƔ T 2 ƦȮ] ƝƔȴ ƦȮ R ƔȏƦʀƤ] ƔȎƦʀƤ T

304 (ƢƣȶƤ ƦơȎμȶƟ ... ƥƢƐƣμƔ): ƾƟƦȴ ƝƔƦȮ ƦʬƟ ǎμʬƟ ƢƔƒƗƫƟ. L 1 lm. addidi

305 ƦʀƤ Ɨȱ ƖƘ ƙȻƥƚƤ : ƗƘƜƝƦƜƝʬƤ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǎμơʝŭ ǿ ƗȰ ƟơʝƤ· ƘǮ ƝƔȴ μƐƞƞƘƜƤ ƦƜ ƗƣɱƟ ƝƔƦȮ ƦʬƟ ǎμʬƟ ƢƔƒƗƫƟ ƦơʝƦơ ǎμơʝ ƙưƥƚƤ ƾƟƔƕƔƞơʝ. L T r(R) 1 lm. ex T (Lascaris): μƚƗŪ ƘDz ƦƜ ƗƣƏƥƘƜƤ L: deest in R; pars ǿ (1) – fin. v. 305 μƚƗŪ – ǒƦƜ explicat 2 ƦơʝƦơ] ƦơƧƦƐƥƦƜƟ R ƦơʝƦơ – fin.] ita reformavit T: μȲ ƦơʝƦơ ƗƣƏƥɾƤ ƙưƥƚƤ ǎμơʝ

114

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

308a [ǂƟƔƟƗƣơƤ Ǡ] ƦƘƝƟơʝƥƔ; : ƦƐƝƟƔ ǒƩơƧƥƔ ȃƢƘƣ žƔƞƞƒμƔƩƮƤ ƨƚƥƜ ƢƔƜƗơʝƥƔ. L Ts.l. 1 ƦƐƝƟƔ ǒƩơƧƥƔ: cf. Hesych. Ʀ 384 ƦƘƝƟơʝƥƔŭ ƦȱƝƟơƟ ǒμƕƣƧơƟ ǒƩơƧƥƔ μƔƩơƤ: fr. 679 Pf. 1 lm. L decurtavi

žƔƞƞƒ-

2 ƢƔƜƗơʝƥƥƔ scholiastae restituit Brunck2 prob. Dindorf 70

308b ƢƣȶƤ μȰƟ ƖȮƣ ƨƯƥƜƟ : ȃƥơƟ μȰƟ ƖƏƣ ǎƥƦƜƟ ǎƝ ƦʀƤ ǟƞƜƝƒƔƤ ƝƔȴ ƨƯƥƘƫƤ ƦʬƟ ƥƫμƏƦƫƟ ƥƦơƩƏƙƘƥƛƔƜ, ǂƢƘƜƣơƤ ƘǴ ƦʬƟ ǎƝ Ʀơʝ ƖƏμơƧ ƢƣơƥƖƜƟơμƐƟƫƟŭ ǒơƜƝƔƤ ƗȰ ȃμƫƤ ƦƜƤ ƘǴƟƔƜ ƘȎƖƘƟƑƤ. L T r(R) 1 lm. deest in ƇR; (ƢƣȶƤ n.) R; accuratiss. vv. 308–9 ƢƣȶƤ – ƖƘƟƟƔƒƔ ƗƐ ƦƜƤ ƖƏƣ (alt.)] ƨƚƥȴƟ Ƈ ǎƥƦƜƟ] ƙʀƟ R: ǒƥƦƜƟ Kruytbosch 44 2 ƦʬƟ ƥƫμƏƦƫƟ] ƦʬƟ ƾƟƛƣưƢƫƟ R: Ʀơʝ ƥưμƔƦơƤ Brunck1, at ƦʬƟ ƥƫμƏƦƫƟ h.l. generaliter dictum est (cf. infin. praes. ƥƦơƩƏƙƘƥƛƔƜ) ƥƦơƩƏƙƘƥƛƔƜ] ƥƦơƩƏƥƔƥƛƔƜ Ƈ ǂƢƘƜƣơƤ ƘǴ] ǂƢ. ǎƥƦȴ Ƈ Ʀơʝ om. R 3 ǒơƜƝƔƤ] ǒơƜƝƘ ƇR ȃμƫƤ om. Ƈ ƘǴƟƔƜ ƘȎƖƘƟƑƤ inverso ordine Ƈ

309 ƖƘƟƟƔƒƔ ƗƐ ƦƜƤ : ƾƢȶ ƦʀƤ ƝƔƦƔƥƦƏƥƘƫƤ ƦƘƝμƔƒƣƘƦƔƜ. L Ts.l. r(R) 1 sch. supra v. 309 legitur in T: iuxta v. 313, ad ȃƥʪƢƘƣ ƝƔȴ ƨƣơƟƘʎƟ pertinens, in L; ad v. 313 numero attribuit R lm. addidi ƝƔƦƔƥƦƏƥƘƫƤ] ƥƦƏƥƘƫƤ R

314 (Ʀƒ ƗŪ ơǴƗŪ – ƝƣƒƟơƜƤ;): Ʀƒ μƘ ƝƔȴ μƏƦƚƟ ƾƟƔƝƣƒƟƘƜƤ; ƾƖƟơʬ ƖƏƣ. L Ts.l. r(R) 1 ƾƟƔƝƣƒƟƘƜƤ: cf. Hesych. Ɲ 4127 ƝƣȵƟƘƜƟ· ... ƾƟƔƝƣȵƟƘƜƟ... 1 lm. addidi; (Ʀƒ s.) L: deest in R; (ƝƣƒƟơƜƤ n.) R ƾƟƔƝƣƒƟ T: ƾƟƔƝƣƒƟƘƜ R

post Ʀƒ add. ƗŪ ǂƟ Ƈ

ƾƟƔƝƣƒƟƘƜƤ]

sch. 308a – sch. 319

115

315 ƖƐƟƟƚμƔ ƦʬƟ ǎƝƘʎƛƘƟ ơȎƝ ǎƟ ȏƥƦƏƦơƜƤ : ơȎƝ ǎƟ ƦƔʎƤ ƾƢƘƣƣƜμμƐƟƔƜƤ ƝƔȴ ƘȎƦƘƞƐƥƜ ƦƘƦƔƖμƐƟƚ ƾƞƞȮ ƗʀƞơƟ ȃƦƜ ƢƣơȒƩơƧƥƔ ǎƟ ƘȎƖƘƟƘƒɯ. L T r(R) 1 lm. deest in ƇR; (ȏƥƦƏƦơƜƤ n.) R ƾƢƘƣƣƜμμƐƟƔƜƤ] ƾƢƘƣƜμμƐƟƔƜƤ TR ƗƚƞơƟƮƦƜ R: om. Ƈ post ƢƣơȒƩơƧƥƔ add. ƦʬƟ Ƈ

2 ƗʀƞơƟ ȃƦƜ]

317 ơȎƗŪ ƾƟƜƥƦƮƣơƧƟ μƔƝƣƏƟ : ǎƢơƞƧƢƣƔƖμƮƟơƧƟ, ƢƘƣƜƘƜƣƖƔƙƮμƚƟŭ μƔƝƣȮƟ ƗȰ ǎƢȴ ƢơƞƯŭ ƝƔƞʬƤ ƗȰ ǿ ſƒƩƔƤ ƗƜȮ Ʀȶ ȓƢơƢƦơƟ ơȎƗȰ Ʀȶ ƖƐƟơƤ ƔȎƦʀƤ ȟμơƞƮƖƚƥƘƟ ƘǮƗƐƟƔƜ. L T r(R); cf. gll. in Ts.l. 1 lm. deest in ƇR; (ƾƟƜƥƦƮƣơƧƟ μƔƝƣƏƟ n.) R ǎƢơƞƧƢƣƔƖμƮƟơƧƟ – 2 ƢơƞƯ] om. in margine T, sed Ts.l. praebuerunt ƢƘƣƜƘƜƣƖƔƙƮμƚƟ ut gl. ad ƾƟƜƥƦȷƣơƧƟ et ǎƢȴ ƢơƞƯ ut gl. ad μƔƝƣȯƟ ƢƘƣƜƘƜƣƖƔƙƮμƚƟ] ƢƘƣƜƘƣƖƔƙơμƐƟƚ R 2 post ƗȰ (pr.) add. ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ R ƗȰ (alt.) om. Ƈ, quippe qui partem scholii ƝƔƞʬƤ (2) – fin. separatim in margine collocet

318 (ƦʬƟ ƠƧƟƘμƢƮƣƫƟ): ƠƧƟƔƜƩμƔƞƫƦƒƗƫƟ· ǒƩƘƜƤ ƗȰ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǒƖƟƫƤ. Ls.l. r(R); cf. gl. in Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris; (ƠƧƟƘμƢƮƣƫƟ n.) R ƠƧƟƔƜƩμƔƞƫƦƒƗƫƟ] ƦʬƟ Ơ. R ƠƧƟƔƜƩμƔƞƫƦƒƗƫƟ – fin.] ƥƧƟƔƜƩμƔƞưƦƫƟ gl. ad ƠƧƟƘμƢƮƣƫƟ nec plura Ƈ

319 (ǢƟƧƦơƟ): džƦƦƜƝʬƤŭ ǢƟƧơƟ. L Ts.l. 1 sch. Ar. Plut. 607a ƾƞƞŪ ƾƟƯƘƜƟ: ƦƜƟȰƤ μƘƦȮ Ʀơʝ «Ʀ» «ƾƟƯƦƘƜƟ». ƢƞƘơƟƏƙơƧƥƜ ƖȮƣ ơǯ džƦƦƜƝơȴ Ʀȶ «Ʀ»; sch. Thuc. II 75, 2 ƾƟƯƦƘƜƟ: ơǯ džƦƦƜƝơȴ Ʀȶ ƾƟƯƘƜƟ ƾƟƯƦƘƜƟ ƨƔƥƒ; Ael. D. Ɣ 150 ƾƟƯƦƘƜƟŭ ơǯ džƦƦƜƝơƒ, ȃƢƘƣ ǟμƘʎƤ ƾƟƯƘƜƟ… = Ɔb Ɣ 1544 = Phot. Ɣ 2151 = Su. Ɣ 2799; Hdn. ƢƔƣƘƝƕ. 5, 19 ȃƦƜ ơǯ džƛƚƟƔʎơƜ ƾƟȹƦƫ ƞȱƖơƧƥƜ ƗƜŪ ǏƟȶƤ Ʀ; ibid. 26, 30; Żesch. ƚ 636 ǢƟƧƦơƟ· ǢƟƧơƟ. ǎƦȱƞơƧƟ (Eur. Bacch. 1100); Eust. Il. II 764, 15–8; III 191, 6–10; IV 434, 23–5 1 lm. add. Lascaris džƦƦƜƝʬƤ om. T

116

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

320 ǎƝ ƥƔƧƦʀƤ : ƾƢȶ ƥƔƧƦʀƤ ƝƔȴ μȲ ȟƤ ƾƨŪ ǟμʬƟ ƾƟƔƖƝƔƙơμƐƟƚŭ ƥƧμƨơƣȮ ƖƏƣ ǎƥƦƜ Ʀȶ μȲ ƖƜƟưƥƝƘƥƛƔƒ ƥƘ ǣƦƜƤ ƦƧƖƩƏƟƘƜƤ. ƦơʝƦơ ƗƐ ƨƚƥƜƟ ȟƤ μƐƞƞơƧƥƔ ƔȎƦʁ ƗƘƠƜʬƤ ƩƣƑƥƔƥƛƔƜ, ƘǮ ƖƟơƒƚ ƦȮ ƝƔƦŪ ƔȎƦƑƟ. L T r(R) 1 lm. deest in ƇR; (ǎƝ ƥƔƧƦʀƤ n.) R; accuratiss. vv. 320–1 ǎƝ ƥƔƧƦʀƤ – ǣƦƜƤ ƘǴ post ƾƢȶ ƥƔƧƦʀƤ add. ƨƚƥƒƟ, ƘǮƢȰ Ƈ 2 ƖƜƟưƥƝƘƥƛƔƜ] ƖƟƫƥƛʀƟƔƜ Ƈ 3 ƗƘƠƜʬƤ] ƗƘƠƒƫƤ R

322 ơȒ ƦǂƣƔ Ʀʭ ƖƘ ƢƣƮƥƛƘƟ : ǎȮƟ ƔǮƗơƧμƐƟƚ ƥƘ ƨƛƐƖƠƚƦƔƜ, ƝƔƦŪ ơȎƗȰƟ ǂƣƔ ǎƠ DzƥơƧ Ʀʭ ƢƣƮƥƛƘƟ ƩƣƮƟʪ ƢƣơƝơμƒƥƘƜƘƟ ƔȎƦʀƤ ƦȲƟ ƖƞʬƦƦƔƟŭ ƦȶƟ ƖȮƣ Ƣƣȶ ƦơƯƦơƧ ƩƣƮƟơƟ ǎƥƜưƢƔ ƝƔȴ ơȎƗȰƟ ƢƣȶƤ ǎμȰ ƦʬƟ ƝƔƛŪ ǏƔƧƦȲƟ ǎƗƚμơƥƒƘƧƥƘƟ ơȒƦƘ μƜƝƣȶƟ ơȒƦƘ μƐƖƔ ƢƔƟƦƘƞʬƤ. L T r(R) 1 lm. deest in ƇR; (ƢƣƮƥƛƘƟ n.) R; accuratiss. vv. 322–4 ơȒ ƦǂƣƔ – ǎƞƏƥƥơƟƔ ǎȮƟ ƔǮƗơƧμƐƟƚ ƥƘ ƨƛƐƖƠƚƦƔƜ om. Ƈ 2 post ǂƣƔ] ǂƣƔ ƨƚƥȴ Ƈ: ǂƣƔ haesitans Blaydes 78, at vide ad sch. El. 259.5 ƢƣơƝơμƒƥƘƜƘƟ] ƢƣơƝơμƒƥƘƜ Bernardakis 59, at vide 2 ƔȎƦʀƤ L (Ɣȏ- dedit Papageorgiou) et Ƈ: ǏƔƧƦʀƤ R: Ɣȏ- Wolff 50 3 Ƣƣȶ ƦơƯƦơƧ] Ƣƣȶ Ʀơʝ Ƈ ǎƥƜưƢƔ] ƥƜưƢƔ R

322–3 (ơȒ ƦǂƣƔ – ƖƞʬƥƥƔƟ): ȟƤ ơȎƝ ǎƞƏƞƚƥƘ ƢƣưƚƟ, ơȎƗȰ ƟʝƟ ƞƔƞƑƥƘƜ. L Ts.l. r(R) 1 lm. addidi; (ǣƦƜƤ ơȎƗƔμɱ v. 323 n.) R; nihil causae est cur cum Wolff 49 interpretem ƗƜƑƥƘƜ pro ƗƜơƒƥƘƜ putanti legisse consentiamus ȟƤ om. T ƢƣưƚƟ] ƢƣƮƥƛƘƟ R

325 (ȞƗƒƟơƧƥƔ): ƝƔƦƔƢơƟơƧμƐƟƚ. L 1 lm. add. Brunck2; (ȞƗƒƟơƧƥƔ s.) L

326 (ƗƔƝƣƧƣƣƮƘƜ): ǎƗƏƝƣƧƘƟ. L 1 cf. sch. Eur. Alc. 826 1 lm. add. Elmsley; scholiastam ƗƔƝƣƧƣƣƮƘƜ pro ƗƔƝƣƧƣƣơƘʎ legisse coni. Wolff 21

117

sch. 320 – sch. 333

327a (ƗƜƑƟƘμơƟ): ǒƣƚμơƟ, ȏƪƚƞƑƟŭ ȋμƚƣơƤ ǞƟƘμƮƘƥƥƏƟ ƨƚƥƜ. L Ts.l. r(R) 1 ȋμƚƣơƤ: Hom. Il. 2.606, 3.305, 8.499, 12.115, 13.724, 18.174, 23.64, 23.297 1 in hoc sch. duas glossas, alteram ǒƣƚμơƟ, alteram ȏƪ. et sqq., compositas esse censet Ellendt s.v. ƗƜƑƟƘμơƤ et Wolff 190 lm. add. Lascaris; (ƗƜƑƟƘμơƟ s.) L; (ƗƜƑƟƘμơƟ n.) R ȏƪƚƞƑƟ R et T (Lascaris): ȏƪƚƞƮƟ L ȋμƚƣơƤ] ǡƟ ȋμ. T ǞƟƘμƮƘƥƥƔƟ] ǞƟƘμƮƘƥƔƟ R

327b ǟ ƗƐ ƦơƜ ƦƯƩƚ : ƔȎƦȲ ƗȰ ǟ ƦƯƩƚ ƝƔƛŪ ǡƟ ƥƜƫƢɲ ǎƢƜƕƞƔƕȲƤ μȰƟ ƔȎƦʁ ǎƥƦƜ, ƝƔƛŪ ȁ ơȎ ƦƧƖƩƏƟƘƜ ƦʀƤ ƢƔƣȮ ƥơʝ ƗƘƠƜƮƦƚƦơƤŭ ȃμƫƤ ƥƧƖƖƟưμƚƟ ǒƩƘƜ. L T r(R) 1 lm. deest in TR; (ƝƔƝȲ μȰƟ v. 328 n.) R; accuratiss. vv. 327–8 ǟ ƗƐ – ǒƩƘƜ ƔȎƦȲ ƗȰ ǟ ƦƯƩƚ] ǟ ƦƯƩƚ ƔȓƦƚ T (ƔȓƦƚ coni. iam Hermann 72 unde ǣƗƘ pro ǟ ƗƐ interpretem habuisse conclusit): om. R post ƦƯƩƚ add. ƨƚƥȴƟ T ƥƜƫƢɲ] ƥƜƫƢɱƟ R ǎƢƜƕƞƔƕȲƤ] ǎƢȴ ƕƞƏƕƚƤ R ƔȎƦʁ om. R 1–2 ƔȎƦʁ ǎƥƦƜ inverso ordine T 2 ȃμƫƤ – fin. om. R post ȃμƫƤ add. ƗȰ T

329 ǟ ƗŪ ơȔƟ ǎƏƥƛƫ : μȲ ƾƟƔƖƝƔƙƐƥƛƫ ƞƐƖƘƜƟ, ƾƞƞȮ ƢƣƔƦƦƐƦƫ ȣƥƢƘƣ ƔȎƦʁ ƨƒƞơƟ, dzƟƔ μȲ ƗƮƠƫμƘƟ ƔȎƦȲƟ ƞƧƢƘʎƟ. L T r(R) 1 lm. deest in TR; (ǎƏƥƛƫ n.) R; accuratiss. vv. 329–331, ǟ ƗŪ ơȔƟ – ƗƮƠɾ ƞƔƕƘʎƟ; e verbis dzƟƔ μȲ ƗƮƠƫμƘƟ – fin. scholium melius ad scripturam ƗƮƠƔƟ ƢƣƮƤ ƖŪ ǎμơʝ ƞƯƢƚƤ ƞƏƕơƜ v. 331 quadrare coni. Hermann 73 et ƞƯƢƚƟ ƢƣƮƤ ƖŪ ǎμơʝ ƗƮƠɾ ƞƔƕƘʎƟ Wolff 50 post ƞƐƖƘƜƟ add. ƨƚƥȴƟ T ȣƥƢƘƣ] ȃƢƘƣ T

333 (ơǵ ): ƢƣȶƤ ƦȶƟ ǧƣƔƝƞƐƔ ƗƚƞơƟƮƦƜ. L Ts.l. r(R) 1 lm. add. Papageorgiou; (ƩƫƣʬμƘƟ n.) R ƗƚƞơƟƮƦƜ add. ƩƫƣʬμƘƟ R

ante ƢƣȶƤ add. ȃƢơƧ T

ƦȶƟ om. T

post

118

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

335 ƔȎƦơʝ ƖƘ ƢƣʬƦơƟ : ǿ ƢƣơƘƧƔƖƖƘƞƜƥƏμƘƟơƤ ƝƔƦƐƩƘƜ ƔȎƦƑƟ, dzƟƔ ƘDzƢɾ ƢƘƣȴ ȥƟ ǢƝơƧƥƘƟ ƢƔƣŪ ƔȎƦơʝ ǎƟ Ʀʭ ƢƣơƔƥƦƘƒʪ ƞƐƖơƟƦơƤ. L T r(R) 1 ǿ ƢƣơƘƧƔƖƖƘƞƜƥƏμƘƟơƤ: vv. 180 sqq. 1 lm. deest in TR; (ƔȎƦơʝ ƦƘ n.) R; accuratiss. vv. 335–8 ƔȎƦơʝ – ǎƖư ƢƣơƘƧƔƖƖƘƞƜƥƏμƘƟơƤ] ƢƣơƚƖƚƥƏμƘƟơƤ ƝƔȴ ƢƣơƘƧƔƖƖ. R 2 ƔȎƦơʝ ad Licham pertinet

336 ơȓƥƦƜƟƔƤ ǂƖƘƜƤ : ǂƖƘƜƤ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǒƢƘμƪƔƤŭ ǤƥƔƟ ƗȰ ƝƔȴ ǂƣƥƘƟƘƤ μƘƦȮ ƦʬƟ ƔǮƩμƔƞưƦƫƟ. L 1 ǤƥƔƟ – fin.] annotatio de ơȓƥƦƜƟƔƤ pro ǃƥƦƜƟƔƤ usitato; cf. sch. 344.2–3 ƝƔȴ ƦơȸƤ ǃμƔ ƗƯƟƦƔƤ ǂƣƥƘƟƔƤ

337 ȥƟ ƦŪ ơȎƗȰƟ ƘǮƥƑƝơƧƥƔƤ : ƢƘƣȴ ƦơƯƦƫƟ ƖȮƣ ƢƏƟƦƫƟ ƢƣơƥƑƝƘƜ ƥƘ μƔƛƘʎƟŭ ƦơƯƦƫƟ ƖȮƣ ǒƩƫ ƦȲƟ ƖƟʬƥƜƟ. L r(R) 1 lm.] deest in R; (ƦơƯƦƫƟ n. v. 338 sic) R; accuratiss. vv. 337–8 ȥƟ ƦŪ ơȎƗȰƟ – ǎƖư ƥƘ] ƥơƜ R

339 Ʀơʝ μƘ ƦƑƟƗŪ ǎƨƒƥƦƔƥƔƜ ƕƏƥƜƟ; : ƦƒƟơƤ ǓƟƘƝƘƟ ƦȲƟ ƢơƣƘƒƔƟ ƝƔȴ ƦȲƟ ƘDzƥơƗơƟ ǯƥƦɲƤ ƝƔȴ ƝƫƞƯƘƜƤũ L r(R); cf. gll. in Ƈs.l. 1 ƢơƣƘƒƔƟ: cf. Hesych. ƕ 287 ƕƏƥƜƤŭ … Ɨƚƞơʎ ƝƔȴ ƦȲƟ ƢơƣƘƒƔƟ. 1 lm. ex L nisi quod pro ƦƑƟƗŪ praebet ƦʀƟƗŪ: deest in R; (Ʀơʝ n.) R 1 ƦƒƟơƤ ǓƟƘƝƘƟ post ƦȲƟ ƢơƣƘƒƔƟ transp. R ƦƒƟơƤ – fin.] ƦȲƟ ƢơƣƘƒƔƟ, ƦȲƟ ƘDzƥơƗơƟ gll. ad ƕƏƥƜƟ; ǯƥƦɲƤ, ƝƫƞƯƘƜƤ gll. ad ǎƨƒƥƦƔƥƔƜ nec plura T

341 (μƏƦƚƟ): ƪƘƧƗʬƤ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

119

sch. 335 – sch. 350a

342 (ǎƝƘƒƟơƧƤ): ƦȶƟ ſƒƩƔƟ ƝƔȴ ƦȮƤ ƔǮƩμƔƞưƦơƧƤ. Ls.l. Ts.l. r(R) 1 lm. add. Papageorgiou

344 ƥơȴ ƦƔʎƥƗƐ ƦŪ ơȎƗƐƟ : ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ơȎƗȰƟ ơȒƦƘ ƢƣȶƤ ƥȰ ơȒƦƘ ƢƣȶƤ ƦƔƯƦƔƤ ƾƢƮƣƣƚƦơƟŭ ƦơƯƦơƧƤ ƗȰ Ǡ ƦȮƤ ƔǮƩμƔƞưƦơƧƤ ƝƔȴ ƦơȸƤ ǃμƔ ƗƯƟƦƔƤ ǂƣƥƘƟƔƤ Ǡ ƦơȸƤ ƢƘƣȴ ƦȶƟ ſƒƩƔƟ. L T r(R) 1 lm. deest in TR; (ƢƮƦƘƣơƟ n. v. 342 sic) R; pars ƾƟƦȴ (1) – ƾƢƮƣƣƚƦơƟ (2) v. 344 ƥơȴ – ƘDzƣƖƘƦƔƜ respicit ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ om. T post ơȎƗȰƟ (alt.) add. ƨƚƥȴ ƦơƯƦƫƟ T 2 ƾƢƮƣƣƚƦơƟ] ǎƥƦȴƟ ƾƢ. T ƦơƯƦơƧƤ] ƦơʝƦơƤ R ƦȮƤ Brunck1: ƦơȸƤ codd. 2–3 ƝƔȴ ƦơȸƤ ǃμƔ ƗƯƟƦƔƤ ǂƣƥƘƟƔƤ om. T 2 ƗƯƟƦƔƤ] ȂƟƦƔƤ Zielinski 54 3 ǂƣƥƘƟƔƤ om. R ƦȶƟ TRLp (Lascaris): ƦȲƟ L

347 ƨưƟƘƜ ƗƒƝƚƤ ǎƤ ǾƣƛƮƟ : ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǎƨưƟƘƜ ƗƜƝƔƒƫƤ ƝƔȴ μƘƦȮ ƾƞƚƛƘƒƔƤ. L Ts.l. r(R) 1–2 μƘƦȮ ƾƞƚƛƘƒƔƤ: cf. sch. 409, 411b 1 lm. deest in TR; (ƨưƟƘƜ ƗƒƝƚƤ n.) R R

ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ] ǢƖơƧƟ T

ǎƨưƟƘƜ] ơȎƝ ǎƨ. T: ƨƫƟƘʎ

347–8 (ƾƞƞŪ Ǡ ƟʝƟ – ƢƔƣʀƟ): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ Ǡ ƦȮ ƢƣƮƦƘƣơƟ Ǡ ƦȮ ƟʝƟ ƪƘƯƗƘƦƔƜ. L r(R) 1 lm. addidi; (ƢƣƮƥƛƘƟ v. 348 n.) R ƦȮ om. R

350a (ǎƠƘƒƣƚƝƔƤ): ǎƠƘʎƢƘƤ. Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

120

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

350b (ǂƖƟơƜƔ μŪ ǒƩƘƜ): ƾƖƟơʬ ƝƔȴ ơȎ ƥƧƟƒƚμƜ. L r(R) 1 lm. scripsit Lascaris: ǎƠƘƒƣƚƝƔƤ R: deest in L; (ǂƖƟơƜƔ s.) L; (ǎƠƘƒƣƚƝƔƤ n.) R

352–3 (ƦʀƤ ƝƮƣƚƤ | ƦƔƯƦƚƤ): ƦʀƤ ǶƮƞƚƤ. Ls.l. Ts.l. r(R) 1 lm. add. Elmsley; (ȟƤ ƦʀƤ ƝƮƣƚƤ) R

sch. ita rescripsit R: ƝƮƣƚƟ ƞƐƖƘƜ ƦȲƟ ǶƮƞƚƟ

353 (ƛŪ ǓƞơƜ): ǏƞȺƟ ƘDzƚŭ ƘǮ ƗȰ ȏƨŪ ǓƟ, ƛƐƞơƜ ǂƟ. L 1 lm. add. Papageorgiou scripserat: ǓƞƫƟ L

ǏƞȺƟ Elmsley praeeunte Heath 81 qui ǏƞưƟ ƘDzƚ

352–5 (ȟƤ –) ƦƑƟ ƛŪ ȏƪƒƢƧƣƖơƟ ƃǮƩƔƞƒƔƟ (– ƦƏƗƘ): ƉƘƣƘƝƯƗƚƤ ƨƚƥȴƟ ơȓƦƫƤŭ μƘƦȮ ƗȰ ƦȶƟ ƾƖʬƟƔ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ ƾƨƜƝƟƘʎƦƔƜ ƢƣȶƤ ŹȒƣƧƦơƟ ƦȶƟ ƀƘƞƔƟƐƫƤ Ʀơʝ džƣƝƘƥƜƞƏơƧ ƘǮƤ ƦȲƟ ƃǮƩƔƞƒƔƟ (ɜƝƘʎƦơ ƗȰ ƔȓƦƚ ǎƟ †żơƯƞɾ ƦʀƤ džƣƝƔƗƒƔƤ) ƝƔȴ ɐƦƘƜ ƦȲƟ ƛƧƖƔƦƐƣƔ țƞƞʪ ƖƧƟƔʎƝƔŭ Ʀơʝ ƗȰ 5 μȲ ƗƮƟƦơƤ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ ƘǵƞƘ ƦȲƟ ƃǮƩƔƞƒƔƟ ƝƔȴ ƦơȸƤ ƧǯơȸƤ ǒƝƦƘƜƟƘƟ, ŹȒƣƧƦơƤ ƗȰ ǒƨƧƖƘƟ ƘǮƤ ŹȒƕơƜƔƟ. ƀƘƟƘƝƣƏƦƚƤ ƗȰ ơȓƦƫƤ ƞƐƖƘƜŭ ǧƣƔƝƞȱƔ ƘǮƤ ǎƢƜƛƧμƒƔƟ ǶƮƞƚƤ ƾƨƜƝƐƥƛƔƜ ƦʀƤ ŹȎƣƯƦơƧ, ƦȶƟ ƗȰ μȲ ƛƐƞƘƜƟ ƗƜƗƮƟƔƜŭ ǢƣƔ ƦƘ ƖȮƣ ƔȎƦʀƤ ƝƔȴ μƒƖƟƧƥƛƔƜ ǒμƘƞƞƘƟ Ʀʁ ƛƧƖƔƦƣƒ, ƘǮ μȲ džƣƖƘʎơƜ ǎƠʀƞƛơƟ ƘǮƤ ƦȲƟ ŹȒƕơƜƔƟ. L T r(R) 1 ƉƘƣƘƝƯƗƚƤ: FGrHist. 3 fr. 82a Olympicum’ Müller, FHG IV 638

2 μƘƦȮ ƗȰ ƦȶƟ ƾƖʬƟƔ: ‘post institutum certamen 3–4 ɜƝƘʎƦơ – džƣƝƔƗƒƔƤ: cf. Strab. VIII 3, 25 ƔȎƦơʝ Ɨȱ ƢơƧ ƝƔȴ ǟ ƃǮƩƔƞȵƔ ǎƥƦȴƟ ǟ Ʀơʝ ŹȎƣȹƦơƧ ǟ ƟʝƟ džƟƗƔƟȵƔ, ƢơƞȵƩƟƜơƟ džƣƝƔƗƜƝȶƟ ǿμȻƟƧμơƟ Ʀʭ żƘƦƦƔƞƜƝʭ ƝƔȴ Ʀʭ ŹȎƕơƬƝʭ; aliter sch. 74 6 MƘƟƘƝƣƏƦƚƤ: Menecrates Nysaensis Müller, FHG II 344–5 1 lm. L supplevi: deest in TR 2 ơȓƦƫƤ] ơȓƦƫ T ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ om. R 3 ƀƘƞƔƟƐƫƤ van Staveren 306 et Heath 81 coll. Paus. IV 3, 10; 33, 5 (cf. etiam Steph. Byz. 276, 4–5; Eust. Il. I 429, 12–3): ƀƐƞƔƟơƤ LTR ɜƝƘʎƦơ] ǒƝƘƜƦơ Papageorgiou omnino immerito, cf. Strab. VIII 3, 7; XIV 2, 19 4 żơƯƞɾ codd., nomen depravatum; verum żưμɾ vel Ƕƛưμɾ (i.e. ƀƘƥƥƚƟƜƔƝʁ cf. Strab. IX, 5, 17) secundum Clavier, ƉơƞƮɾ Stiehle 607, MƘƥƮƞɾ Sauppe; ȆƞơƯƣƘƜ temptavi coll. Strab. VIII 3, 25 (ȃμƫƤ ƗŪ ǒƟƜơƜ ƦȲƟ ƟʝƟ ȊƞơƧƣƜƟ Ǡ ȊƞơƧƣƔƟ ǎƟ Ʀʭ ƝƔƞơƧμȱƟʪ ƔȎƞʬƟƜ ƦʀƤ ƀƘƥƥƚƟȵƔƤ ƝƘƜμȱƟƚƟ ŸȻƣƜơƟ

sch. 350b – sch. 358a

121

ƞȱƖơƧƥƜƟ. ƔȎƦơʝ Ɨȱ ƢơƧ ƝƔȴ ǟ ƃǮƩƔƞȵƔ ǎƥƦȴƟ ǟ Ʀơʝ ŹȎƣȹƦơƧ ǟ ƟʝƟ džƟƗƔƟȵƔ, ƢơƞȵƩƟƜơƟ džƣƝƔƗƜƝȶƟ ǿμȻƟƧμơƟ Ʀʭ żƘƦƦƔƞƜƝʭ ƝƔȴ Ʀʭ ŹȎƕơƬƝʭ) et Eust. Il. I 461, 19–22 5 μȲ] expectes ơȎ, sed vide ad sch. El. 31.3 ƗƮƟƦơƤ] ƗƜƗƮƟƦơƤ Ƈ ǒƝƦƘƜƟƘƟ] ƾƢƐƝƦƘƜƟƘƟ T 6 ŹȒƣƧƦơƤ Pherecydi restituit Müller (FHG IV 638) ex Herodoro (FGrHist 31 fr. 37): ǺƨƜƦơƤ LTR ơȓƦƫƤ] ơȓƦƫ T 6–7 ơȓƦƫƤ – ŹȎƣƯƦơƧ] ơȓƦƫƤŭ ƞƐƖƘƦƔƜ ƘǮƤ ǎƢƜƛƧμƒƔƟ ǶƮƞƚƤ ƦʀƤ ŹȎƣƯƦơƧ ƾƨƜƝƐƥƛƔƜ ǧƣƔƝƞƐƔ R 7 ƾƨƜƝƐƥƛƔƜ] ǎƞƛƘʎƟ T μȲ] vide ad sch. 103–7.2 8 ƔȎƦʀƤ] ƔȎƦȶƤ Nauck 431

355a (ƛƐƞƠƘƜƘƟ): ƢƘƢƘƜƝȺƤ ƘDzƚ. L 1 cf. Su. Ƙ 296 ǎƛƐƞƖƘƦơ: ǎƢƘƒƛƘƦơ... 1 lm. add. Lascaris

ƘDzƚ Brunck1: ƘǴƘƟ L

355b ƔǮƩμƏƥƔƜ ƦƏƗƘ : ƝƔƦƔƢƣƏƠƔƥƛƔƜ Ʀʁ ƔǮƩμʁ, ȃ ǎƥƦƜ ƗƜȮ ƢơƞƐμơƧ ƝƔƦơƣƛʬƥƔƜ. L Ts.l. r(R) 1 ƗƜȮ ƢơƞƐμơƧ: cf. sch. D Hom. Il. 4.324 ƔǮƩμƏƥƥơƧƥƜƟ: …ƢơƞƘμƑƥơƧƥƜƟ; Hesych. Ɣ 2191 ƔǮƩμȯƙƘƜ· ƢơƞƘμƘʎ, μȯƩƘƦƔƜ; ibid. Ɣ 2195 ƔǮƩμƏƥƔƤŭ … ƢơƞƘμƑƥƔƤ; ibid. Ɣ 2192 ƔǮƩμƔȵ· ƢȷƞƘμơƜ 1 lm. deest in TR; (ƔǮƩμƏƥƔƜ n.) R 2 ƝƔƦơƣƛʬƥƔƜ om. T

ȃ ǎƥƦƜ] ǢƖơƧƟ T

ƗƜȮ ƢơƞƐμơƧ] Ʀʭ ƢơƞƐμʪ T

358a ȁƟ ƟʝƟ ƢƔƣưƥƔƤ : ƦȶƟ ǒƣƫƦƔ ƔȎƦʀƤ ƾƢƫƥƏμƘƟơƤ ƦƾƟƔƟƦƒƔ ƘǴƢƘƟ ǿ ſƒƩƔƤ. L r(R); cf. gll. in Ts.l. 1 ƾƢƫƥƏμƘƟơƤ: cf. sch. Eur. Andr. 30 (ad lm. ƢƔƣưƥƔƤ) ƾƢƫƥȯμƘƟơƤ, ƾƢƫƛȳƥƔƤ, ȏƕƣȵƥƔƤ; Hesych. Ƣ 1041 ƢƔƣƫƥƏμƘƟơƤŭ ƾƢƫƛƑƥƔƤ… 1 ƦȶƟ ǒƣƫƦƔ – 1 lm. deest in R; (ƢƔƣưƥƔƤ n.) R; accuratiss. v. 358 ȁƟ ƟʝƟ – ƞƐƖƘƜ fin.] ƦȶƟ ǒƣƫƦƔ gl. ad ȁƟ, ƾƢƫƥƏμƘƟơƤ gl. ad ƢƔƣưƥƔƤ, ǿ ſƒƩƔƤ gl. ad ơȕƦơƤ, ƦơȎƟƔƟƦƒơƟ gl. ad ǒμƢƔƞƜƟ nec plura T ƾƢƫƥƏμƘƟơƤ] ƾƢơƢƘμƪƏμƘƟơƤ R

122

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

358b (ƢƔƣưƥƔƤ): ƢƔƣƔƢƘμƪƏμƘƟơƤ. L 1 lm. add. Elmsley

360a1 ƝƣƯƨƜơƟ ȟƤ ǒƩɾ ƞƐƩơƤ : ƞƔƛƣƔʎƮƟ ƥơƜ, μȲ ƘǮƗƧȵƔƤ ƥơʝ. L T r(R) 1 lm.] ƝƣƯƨƜơƟ ƞƐƩơƤ T: deest in R

ante ƞƔƛƣƔʎƮƟ add. ǢƖơƧƟ T ƥơƜ om. T

360a2 (ƝƣƯƨƜơƟ ȟƤ ǒƩɾ ƞƐƩơƤ): [ƾƞƞŪ] dzƟƔ ȟƤ ƢƔƞƞƔƝƒƗƔ ƔȎƦȲƟ ƞƏƕơƜ. L T r(R) 1 haec a sch. pr. separavi lm. addidi ƢƔƞƞƔƝȴƟ T ƞƏƕơƜ] ǒƩɾ T

ƾƞƞŪ delevi

ƢƔƞƞƔƝƒƗƔ] ƢƔƞƞƔƝȲƟ Ta:

362 (ǎƟ ɓ): Ʀʁ ƃǮƩƔƞƒɯ, Ʀʁ ƢƔƦƣƒƗƜ ƦʀƤ ǶƮƞƚƤ. Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris

365 ƝƔȴ ƟʝƟ ȟƤ ǿƣɲƤ : ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ȟƤ ƾƝơƯƘƜƤ, ǣƝƘƜ ƗȰ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǎƞƘƯƥƘƦƔƜŭ ƗƜȮ ƗȰ ƦơƯƦƫƟ ƦȲƟ ƦƔƩƘʎƔƟ ƔȎƦơʝ ǂƨƜƠƜƟ ǎƢƔƖƖƐƞƞƘƦƔƜ. ơȎƝ ƾƨƣơƟƦƒƥƦƫƤ ƗȰ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ơȎƩ ȟƤ ǒƦƧƩƘƟ ƾƞƞȮ ƗƜȮ ƢơƞƞʀƤ ƨƣơƟƦƒƗơƤ ǒƩƫƟ ƔȎƦȲƟ ƝƔȴ ƾƖƔƢʬƟ. L Ƈ; cf. gl. in Ƈs.l. 1 ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ȟƤ ƾƝơƯƘƜƤ: cf. sch. Eur. Hec. 174 †ȟƤ DzƗɾƤ: μƘƦȯƞƚƪƜƤ ƔǮƥƛȳƥƘƫƤ ƝƔƞƘʎƦƔƜ Ʀȶ ƥƩʀμƔ· Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ DzƗɾƤ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƾƝơȹƥɾƤ ǎƨƛȱƖƠƔƦơ. μƘƦȳƞƞƔƠƘ ƗȰ ƦȲƟ ƗȹƟƔμƜƟ ƦʬƟ ȢƦƫƟ ƘǮƤ ƦȲƟ ƗȹƟƔμƜƟ ƦʬƟ ǾƨƛƔƞμʬƟ· ơȎ ƖȮƣ μƘƦȮ ƦʬƟ ȢƦƫƟ ƕƞȱƢƘƜ ƦƜƤ. ƗƜȮ ƦơʝƦơ ƝƔȴ μƘƦȯƞƚƪƜƤ ƔǮƥƛȳƥƘƫƤ ȞƟơμȯƥƛƚ ƦơʝƦơ 1 lm. deest in T ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ȟƤ ƾƝơƯƘƜƤ om. T in margine, sed ƾƝơƯƘƜƤ gl. ad ǿƣɲƤ post ǎƞƘƯƥƘƦƔƜ add. ȃƥơƟ ơȒƢƫ T invenitur supra lineam ƗȰ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ om. T 2 ƗƜȮ ƗȰ ƦơƯƦƫƟ] ƗƜȮ ƦơƯƦƫƟ ƗȰ T

123

sch. 358b – sch. 372a

367 μƚƗȰ ƢƣơƥƗƮƝƔ ƦƮƗƘ : Ʀȶ ǎƟ ƗơƯƞƚƤ μƐƣƘƜ ǒƩƘƜƟ ƔȎƦƑƟ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. deest in T; ǎƟ ƗơƯƞƚƤ μƐƣƘƜ] ȟƤ ƗơƯƞƚƟ T

368 (ǎƟƦƘƛƐƣμƔƟƦƔƜ): ǎƝƝƐƝƔƧƦƔƜ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris: ǎƝƦƘƛƐƣμƔƟƦƔƜ pro ǎƟƦƘƛƐƣμƔƟƦƔƜ legisse commentatorem coni. Valckenaer 70r

371–2 (ƝƔȴ ƦƔʝƦƔ – ǎμơƒ ): ȣƥƦƘ μƘ ƝƔȴ μƔƣƦƯƣƫƟ ƘȎƢơƣƘʎƟ, ƘǮ ƾƣƟƑƥƔƜƦơ. L 1 lm. addidi: ȣƥƦŪ ǎƠƘƞƐƖƩƘƜƟ (v. 373) add. Elmsley

372a [ƾƖơ]ƣśɲ ƥƧƟƘƠ[ƑƝơƧƟ : [ƞƘƜ]μśʬśƟśƜ ƦƔʝƦś[Ɣ [ƾƖơ]ƣɲ ƟơʀƥƔƜ[ fr. 6–10

] ]ƘśƜśμśʬśƟơƤś[

] ] P.Oxy. XV 1805

1–3 [ƾƖơ]ƣśɲ ƥƧƟƘƠ[ƑƝơƧƟ: ] | ƞƘƜ]μśʬśƟƜś ƦƔʝƦś[Ɣ ]| [ƾƖơ]ƣɲ ƟơʀƥƔƜ[ƗƘʎ Ʀȶ ǎƢȴ ƞ]ƘśƜśμśʬśƟơƤś [ǂƛƣơƜƥμƔ?] | suppleverunt Grenfell et Hunt [ƾƖơ]ƣśɲ ƥƧƟƘƠ[ƑƝơƧƟ: ƝƔȴ Ƣơƞƞơȴ ƥ(ƧƟ)ƦƧƖƩƏƟơƟƦƘƤ ǎƟ] | ƞƘƜ]μśʬśƟƜś ƦƔʝƦś[Ɣ ǢƝơƧơƟ, ơȎ μƮƟƫƤ ǎƖư.] | [ƾƖơ]ƣɲŭ ƟơʀƥƔƜ [ƗƘʎ Ʀȶ ǎƢȴ ?ƞ]ƘśƜśμśʬśƟơƤś [ǂƛƣơƜƥμƔ]| supplevit e.g. McNamee, Annotations in Greek and Latin Texts from Egypt (American Studies in Papyrology 45) 2007, 364

124

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

372b (ƾƖơƣɲ ): ƾƛƣơƒƥμƔƦƜ. L Ts.l. 1 cf. sch. Hom. Od. 2.150 ƾƞƞŪ ȃƦƘ ƗȲ μȱƥƚƟ ƾƖơƣȲƟ] ƾƞƞŪ ǿƢȷƦƔƟ μȱƥơƟ Ʀơʝ ƾƛƣơȵƥμƔƦơƤ, ǎƟ ɣ ƢơƞƞƔȴ ƨʀμƔȵ ƘǮƥƜ, ƢƔƣƘƖȱƟơƟƦơ; sch. Hom. Il. 18.274b … Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ ƘǮƟ ƾƖơƣʁ ƟʝƟ ơȎƝ ǎƟ ǎƝƝƞƚƥƒɯ ƥƚμƔƒƟƘƜ, ƾƞƞŪ ǎƟ Ʀʭ ƾƛƣơƒƥμƔƦƜ; Apollon. S. 4, 15 ƾƖơƣȯŭ ǟ ǎƝƝƞƚƥȵƔ … ƝƔȴ Ʀȶ ƥƧƟȯƛƣơƜƥμƔ; Hesych. Ɣ 724 ƾƖơƣȳ· ǎƝƝƞƚƥȵƔ. ƔȎƦȶ Ʀȶ ǂƛƣơƜƥμƔ...; ibid. Ɣ 699 džƖơƣȯ· ... ƢƔƣŪ ȇμȳƣʪ ƗȰ ƝƔȴ ƢȯƟƦƔ ƾƛƣơƜƥμȷƟ; Phot. Ɣ 221 džƖơƣƏŭ ... ƢƔƣŪ ȇμƑƣʪ (ŵ 54) ƢɱƤ ƾƛƣơƜƥμƮƤ ... 1 lm. add. Lascaris; (ƾƖơƣɲ s.) L ƾƛƣơƒƥμƔƦƜ] ƥƧƟƔƛƣơƒƥμƔƦƜ T

374 ơȎƩ ǣƗơμƔƜ : ƞƧƢơʝμƔƜ μȰƟ ơȎƝ ƘǮƢȻƟ ƥơƜ ƦȮ ƝƘƩƔƣƜƥμƐƟƔ, ƾƞƞŪ ȃμƫƤ ƾƞƚƛƘƒƔƤ ǎƖƖƯƤ. L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 373–4 ƘǮ ƗȰ μȲ – ȃμƫƤ post μȰƟ add. ƨƚƥȴƟ T ƝƘƩƔƣƜƥμƐƟƔ T Lp (Lascaris) (cf. sch. 484.2): ƝƘƩƫƣƜƥμƐƟƔ L 2 ƾƞƚƛƘƒƔƤ – fin. ita retractavit T: ƾƞƚƛʀ ƘǮƥƜƟ ǃƢƘƣ ƘDzƣƚƝƔ ǎƖƖƯƤ] ǒƦƧƩƘƤ Zielinski 54 coll. Pl. Thaet. 186c ƃǵȷƟ ƦƘ ơȔƟ ƾƞƚƛƘȵƔƤ ƦƧƩƘʎƟ, ɣ μƚƗȰ ơȎƥȵƔƤ;: ǎƖƖȸƤ Papageorgiou

377–8 DŽƣŪ ƾƟưƟƧμơƤ | ƢƐƨƧƝƘƟ : DŽƣƔ ǂƥƚμơƤ ơȓƦƫƤ ǎƥƦȴ ƝƔȴ ƗƧƥƖƘƟƑƤ, ȟƤ μƚƗȰ Ʀȶ ȂƟơμƔ ƔȎƦʀƤ ƖƜƖƟưƥƝƘƥƛƔƜ; L T 1 ǂƥƚμơƤ: cf. sch. Eur. Hipp. 1 (ad lm. ƾƟưƟƧμơƤ): ǂƗơƠơƤ; Hesych. Ɣ 5598 ƾƟȻƟƧμơƤ· ǂƗơƠơƤ (Eur. Hipp. 1); ibid. Ɣ 5599 ƾƟƫƟƯμơƧƤŭ ƾƗƮƠơƧƤ 1 lm. deest in T

2 μƚƗȰ] μȲ ƗȰ T

ƖƜƖƟưƥƝƘƥƛƔƜ] ƖƜƟưƥƝƘƥƛƔƜ T

379a ȂμμƔ : ƦƜƟȰƤ Ʀȶ Ʀơʝ ƾƖƖƐƞơƧ ƢƣƮƥƫƢƮƟ ƨƔƥƜ. Ʀȶ ƗȰ ƝƔƦŪ ȂμμƔ ƝƔȴ ƨƯƥƜƟ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƘȎƢƣƘƢȲƤ ƦȲƟ ȂƪƜƟ ƝƔȴ Ʀȶ ƢɱƟ ƥʬμƔ. L T 1 ƢƣƮƥƫƢơƟ: cf. sch. OT 80 ubi ȂμμƔƦƜ (81) per ƢƣƮƥƫƢơƟ explanatur; sch. Eur. Phoen. 1384 ƘǮ ƗŪ ȂμμŪ ȏƢƘƣƥƩȷƟ: ȂμμƔ ƨƚƥȴƟ ƾƢȶ μȱƣơƧƤ Ʀȶ ƢƣȷƥƫƢơƟ… 1 lm. scripsi: Ǥ ƝƔȴ ƦȮ ƞƔμƢƣƏ L: deest in T; qui commentatores v. 379 ad nuntium pertinere censuerunt, lemma codicis L habuisse non possunt, sed sive Ȥ ƝƏƣƦƔ ƞƔμƢƣȰ legerunt sive simile quid ƦƜƟȰƤ – ƨƔƥƜ om. T ƗȰ deest in T

sch. 372b – sch. 382b2

125

379b (Ǥ ƝƔȴ – ƨƯƥƜƟ;): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ· DŽƣƔ Ʀʁ ƛȱɯ ƝƔȴ Ʀȶ ƖƐƟơƤ ǎƨƏμƜƞƞơƟ; L T 1 hoc sch. a sch. pr. separavi praeeunte Wolff 51 ‘apparet ... diversum a priore eum scholiastam esse, qui annotaverit: ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ sqq.’; probat Nauck 431; vide Xenis; lm. addidi 1 ǂƣƔ Papageorgiou, renuente Nauck 431 interrogandi signum in exeunte scholio posuit Wolff l.c.

382a (ƕƞƏƥƦƔƤ): ƦơȸƤ ƖơƟƘʎƤ ƾƨŪ ȥƟ ǎƕƞƏƥƦƚƥƘƟ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris

382b1 ƗʀƛƘƟ : ƢƣơƥƢơƜơƯμƘƟơƤ μƚƗƐƟƔ ǞƣƫƦƚƝƐƟƔƜ μƚƗȰ ǎƖƟƫƝƐƟƔƜ. L Ts.l. 1 ǞƣƫƦƚƝƐƟƔƜ: de ǯƥƦơƣƘʎƟ per ǎƣƫƦɱƟ explicato vide sch. 415 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. v. 382 ƗʀƛƘƟ – ǯƥƦơƣʬƟ 103–7.2 μƚƗƐƟƔ] μƚƗȰƟ T μƚƗȰ ǎƖƟƫƝƐƟƔƜ om. T

μƚƗƐƟƔ ... μƚƗȰ] vide ad sch.

382b2 (ƗʀƛƘƟ): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ȟƤ Ɨȳ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 cf. sch. Eur. Med. 785 (ad lm. ƦƑƟƗƘ μȲ ƨƧƖƘʎƟ ƩƛƮƟƔ): ƖƣȯƨƘƦƔƜ ƗʀƛƘƟ μȲ ƨƘȹƖƘƜƟ ƩƛȷƟƔ, dzƟŪ ɒ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ· ȟƤ ƗȲ ƢƔƣƔƜƦƚƥơμȱƟơƧƤ ƦȲƟ ƨƧƖȳƟ. ƦƜƛȱƔƥƜ ƖȮƣ Ʀȶ ƗʀƛƘƟ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ȟƤ Ɨȳ; sch. Thuc. I 92, 1 ƗʀƛƘƟ: Ʀȶ ƗʀƛƘƟ ƢƣơƥƢơȵƚƥƜƟ μȰƟ ǒƩƘƜ ƾƞƚƛƘȵƔƤ, ƗȹƟƔμƜƟ ƗȰ ƪƘȹƗơƧƤ; Ael. D. Ɨ 10 ƗʀƛƘƟ ȟƤ «Ɨȳ» ƨƚƥȵ (I 92)· ƦơʝƦơ ƗȰ ƢƣơƥƢơȵƚƥƜƟ ƾƞƚƛƘȵƔƤ ǒƩƘƜ, ƗȹƟƔμƜƟ ƗȰ ƪƘȹƗơƧƤ. ƞƔμƕȯƟƘƦƔƜ ƗȰ Ʀȶ ƛƘƟ ȟƤ ƢƔƣƔƢƞƚƣƫμƔƦƜƝȷƟ unde Ɔ Ɨ 115 = Phot. Ɨ 229 = Su. Ɨ 377; sch. Ap. Rh. 88, 7–8 Ʀȶ ƗȰ ƗʀƛƘƟ ƢơƦȰ μȰƟ ƢƔƣƔƢƞƚƣƫμƔƦƜƝȷƟ, ƢơƦȰ ƗȰ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƗƚƞƔƗȲ Ǡ ȟƤ Ɨȳ; Hesych. Ɨ 771 ƗʀƛƘƟ· ȟƤ Ɨȳ [Ǡ] ƨƚƥƜƟ. (Eur. Or. 1320 ...) 1 lm. add. Elmsley ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ om. T

126

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

383 ȂƞơƜƟƦơ μȳ ƦƜ ƢƏƟƦƘƤ : ȂƞơƜƟƦơ μȲ ƢƏƟƦƘƤ ǂƟƛƣƫƢơƜ, ƾƞƞŪ ơǯ ƝƔƝơȴ ƝƔȴ ȃƥơƜ μƚƩƔƟʬƟƦƔƜ ƞȯƛƣɯ ƝƔȴ ƝƔƝơƯƣƖơƧƤ ƞƮƖơƧƤ ǏƔƧƦơʎƤ ƥƧƟƦƜƛƐƔƥƜƟ. L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 383–4 ȂƞơƜƟƦơ – ƝƔƝƏ; ‘hoc scholium ad poetae verba non quadrat. legit sine dubio interpres: μƑ ƦƜ ƢƏƟƦƘƤ, ơǯ ƝƔƝơȴ ƗȰ ƝƔȴ’ Wolff 250 post ȂƞơƜƟƦơ add. ƨƚƥƜ T ǂƟƛƣƫƢơƜ] ơǯ ǂƟ. T 2 ƞƏƛƣɯ] ƞƏƛƣɯ vel ƞƔƛƣƔʎƔ Bernardakis 60, sed μƚƩƔƟʬμƔƜ absolute h.l. dicitur

389a1 (ơȎƝ ƾƢȶ ƖƟȻμƚƤ): ƾƞƞŪ ƾƣƘƥƦƏ. Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

389a2 (ơȎƝ ƾƢȶ ƖƟȻμƚƤ): ơȎƝ ǂƟƘƧ ƥƧƟƐƥƘƫƤ Ǡ ƦơʝƦơ Ɲƾμơȴ ƾƣƐƥƝƘƜ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris post ƥƧƟƐƥƘƫƤ inseruit ƾƞƞŪ ǂƣƜƥƦƔ T

390 (ǟμƘʎƤ ƗȰ ƢƣơƥμƐƟƫμƘƟ;): ƝƔƦŪ ǎƣưƦƚƥƜƟ. L 1 lm. add. Elmsley

392 (ƔȎƦƮƝƞƚƦơƤ): ƔȎƦƮμƔƦơƤ. Ls.l. 1 cf. Philox. fr. 646 ƔȎƦȷμƔƦơƤ· ƔȎƦȷƝƞƚƦơƤ ƝƔȴ ƔȎƦơƢƣȷƛƧμơƤ...; Eust. Il. I 377, 18– 9; ibid. IV 195, 10; Zonar. 342, 11 1 lm. add. Lascaris

sch. 383 – sch. 399

127

394a (ȟƤ ǓƣƢơƟƦơƤ ƘǮƥơƣɲƤ ǎμơʝ ): ǿƣɲƤ Ɩȯƣ μƘ ǓƣƢơƟƦƔ ƝƔȴ ƥƢƘƯƗơƟƦƔ ƢƣȶƤ ƦȶƟ ǧƣƔƝƞƐƔ. L T 1 lm. add. Lascaris Ɩȯƣ om. T post μƘ add. ƨƚƥȴƟ T

394b (ǓƣƢơƟƦơƤ ƘǮƥơƣɲƤ ǎμơʝ ): ȟƤ Ʀȶ ƝƔƦƘƏƖƚ ƦʀƤ ƝƘƨƔƞʀƤ. L T 1–2 annotatio de genetivo (ǓƣƢơƟƦơƤ… ǎμơʝ) pro accusativo (ǓƣƢơƟƦƔ … ǎμƐ) usitato cf. sch. Hom. Il. 4.100c ǾʍƥƦƘƧƥơƟ ƀƘƟƘƞȯơƧ: ȟƤ «ǎƠȱƣƣƚƠƘƟ ǿƗơʎơ» (Ƌ 421) ƝƔȴ «ƝƔƦƘȯƖƚ ƦʀƤ ƝƘƨƔƞʀƤ»; ibid. 23.421a ǎƠƐƣƣƚƠƘƟ ǿƗơʎơ: džƦƦƜƝʬƤ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǿƗƮƟ; sch. Ar. Vesp. 1428 ƾƦƦƜƝȶƟ Ʀȶ ƥƩʀμƔ; Eust. Od. I 394, 39–40 Ƈȶ ƗȰ ƾƥƦƣƔƖȯƞƫƟ ǎȯƖƚ ȃ ǎƥƦƜ ƥƢơƟƗȹƞƫƟ, ƾƣƩȲ ƦơʎƤ μƘƛŪ ȋμƚƣơƟ Ʀơʝ ƘǮƢƘʎƟ ȟƤ ǿ ƗƘʎƟƔ ƝƔƦƘȯƖƚ ƦʀƤ ƝƘƨƔƞʀƤ. Ʀȶ μȱƟƦơƜ ƝơƜƟȷƦƘƣơƟ ǎȯƖƚ ƾƥƦƣƔƖȯƞơƧƤ Ǡ ƝƘƨƔƞȳƟ 2 Ar. Vesp. 1428 1 lm. addidi ȟƤ Ʀȶ] ǒƥƦƜ ƗȰ ȃμơƜơƟ Ʀʭ T

396 ƾƟƔƟƘưƥƔƥƛƔƜ : ƾƟƔƝƔƜƟƒƥƔƥƛƔƜ ƝƔȴ ƔȔƛƜƤ ǿμƜƞʀƥƔƜ ƾƝƣƜƕʬƤ ǎƝ ƟƐƔƤŭ Ǡ ơȓƦƫ, ƢƣȴƟ ǟμʎƟ ƝƔƜƟơƦƐƣơƧƤ ƾƟƔƝơƜƟưƥƔƥƛƔƜ ƞƮƖơƧƤ. L T Eust. Il. III 88, 7–8 ...ǎƠ ơȕ ƝƔȴ ƢƔƣȮ ƆơƨơƝƞƘʎ ƾƟƔƟƘȻƥƔƥƛƔƜ ƞȷƖơƧƤ Ʀȶ ƾƟƔƝƜƟʀƥƔƜ, ƘǮƢƘʎƟ ƗȰ ƝƔƜƣƜȻƦƘƣơƟ, ƾƟƔƢơƞʀƥƔƜ. 1 lm. hoc novisse grammaticum coni. Valckenaer 70r et Lloyd-Jones – Wilson: ƟƘƏƥƔƥƛƔƜ Tp.c.: ƟƘưƥƔƥƛƔƜ Ta.c.: deest in L; (ƝƔȴ ƟƘưƥƔƥƛƔƜ s.) L 1–2 ǎƝ ƟƐƔƤ] ƟƘƫƥƦȴ T 2 ơȓƦƫ] ơȓƦƫƤ T ƝƔƜƟơƦƐƣơƧƤ] ƝơƜƟoƦƐƣơƧƤ T

399 (DzƥƦƫ – ƝƧƣʬ ): DzƥƦƫ ǿ μƐƖƔƤ źƘȸƤ ȃƦƜ ƢƘƣȴ ȥƟ ơǴƗƔ ƾƝƣƜƕʬƤ ƥơƜ ƗƜƚƖƑƥơμƔƜ. L T 1 lm. addidi ƥơƜ om. T

128

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

401 (ȥƟ ƗŪ ǒƕƞƔƥƦƘƟ): ƾƟƦȴ ȏƢȶ ƦƒƟơƤ ǎƦƐƩƛƚ. L; cf. gl. in Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris ƾƟƦȴ – ǎƦƐƩƛƚ] ǎƦƐƩƛƚ gl. ad ǒƕƞƔƥƦƘƟ nec plura T

402a (ƢƣȶƤ ƦƒƟŪ ): ȃƦƜ ƢƣȶƤ ƕƔƥƜƞƒƗƔŭ Ʀȶ ƗȰ Ʃ ȃƦƜ Ʀȶ ȥƗƘ ƦơƢƜƝƮƟ ǎƥƦƜƟ. L 1 lm. addidi; auctorem huius scholii totum v. 402 Deianirae adscripsisse conicias iuxta v. 402 Ʃ praebet L verbum ǎƥƦƜƟ quod in L legitur neglexit Papageorgiou

Ʃ]

402b (ơȕƦơƤ – ƗơƝƘʎƤ;): ȟƤ ƘǮƝȶƤ ƝƏƦƫ ƟƐƟƘƧƝƘƟ ǿ ſƒƩƔƤŭ ƝƔƦƔƥƩơʝƥƔ ơȔƟ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƦʀƤ ƩƘƜƣƮƤ ƨƚƥƜƟŭ ƾƢƮƕƞƘƪơƟ ƘǮƤ ǎμƐŭ ǿ ƗȰ ƾƟƔƟƘƯƥƔƤ ǒƨƚŭ ƢƣȶƤ ƦƒƟƔ ƖȮƣ ƟơμƒƙƘƜƤ μƘ ƕƞƐƢƘƜƟ; L T 1 lm. addidi; scholiasta verba ơȕƦơƤ, ƕƞƐƨŪ ȥƗƘ v. 402 Deianirae tribuit, reliqua Lichae ȟƤ ƘǮƝȶƤ] ȟƤ ǒƥƦƜƟ ƘǮƝƏƥƔƜ ȃƦƜ T 2 ƦʀƤ] ƾƢȶ ƦʀƤ T ǒƨƚ] ƘǴƢƘƟ ǀƟ T

404 ƦƮƞμƚƥơƟ ƘǮƢƘʎƟ : ƝƔƞʬƤ Ʀȶ ƦƮƞμƚƥơƟ ȟƤ ƾƢơƗƘƜƞƜʬƟƦơƤ ƘǮƢƘʎƟ ƗƜȮ ƦȲƟ ƗƘƥƢƮƦƜƟ. L 1 lm. ex Lp; v. 403 ad Lichae ascripsit commentator ǎƣƫƦƑƥƔƥŪ ǒƩƘƜƤ pro ǎƣƫƦƑƥƔƤ ǒƩƘƜƤ legens et v. 404 Deianirae ƘǮƢƘʎƟ quod praebet L neglexit Papageorgiou

405–7 (ƢƣȶƤ ƦȲƟ ƝƣƔƦơʝƥƔƟ – ƦȲƟ ǎμƑƟ): ƦơʝƦơ ƢƣȶƤ Ʀȶ

ƦƒƟŪ ǎƟƟƐƢƘƜƟ ƗơƝƘʎƤ; L T 2 v. 402 1 lm. addidi hoc sch. cum sch. 402b c. in T ƦơʝƦơ (ƦƔʝƦƔ dedit Papageorgiou) ƢƣȶƤ Ʀȶ L: ƢƣȶƤ ȁ Ʀȶ T 2 ƢƣȶƤ add. Wansink 98; cave Papageorgio credas ƢƣȶƤ ante ƦƒƟŪ exstare in L

sch. 401 – sch. 414a

129

409 (ƗƒƝƔƜƔ): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƾƞƚƛʀ. L; cf. gl. in Ts.l. 1 cf. sch. 411b, sch. 347 1 lm. add. Elmsley; (ƗƒƝƔƜƔ s.) L

ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƾƞƚƛʀ] ƾƞƚƛʬƤ gl. ad ƗƒƝƔƜƔ nec plura T

411a (ǎƤ ƦƑƟƗƘ): ƗƘƜƝƦƜƝʬƤ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Brunck1 interpres vv. 410–1 a Deianira dici putavit

411b (μȲ ƗƒƝƔƜơƤ ȢƟ): μȲ ƾƞƚƛƘƯƫƟ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 cf. sch. 409, sch. 347 1 lm. add. Brunck1

412 Ʀƒ ƢơƦƘ ƢơƜƝƒƞƔƥŪ ǒƩƘƜƤ; : Ʀƒ ƢƘƢƔƟơƯƣƖƚƝƔƤ ƝƔƦŪ ǎμơʝ; Ʀƒ ǎμƚƩƔƟƑƥƫ Ǡ ǎƗơƞƜưƥƫ; L T 1 lm. sic L: deest in T; Deianiram adloquitur Lichas secundum grammaticum quippe qui ƢơƜƝƒƞƔƥŪ pro ƢơƜƝƒƞƔƤ legerit 2 ǎƗơƞƜưƥƫ] ǎƗơƞƜƘƯƥƫ T (Lascaris)

414a (Ǥ ): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǢμƚƟ. Ls.l. 1 sch. OC 973 ǒƔ Ǥ; sch. Eur. Hec. 13 ƟƘȻƦƔƦơƤ ƗŪ ǤƟ: ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǢμƚƟ ƨƚƥȵƟ. džƦƦƜƝʬƤ ƗȰ ǤƟ. ƝƔȴ ƩƫƣȴƤ ƗȰ Ʀơʝ Ɵ Ǥ, ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǒƔ. ơȓƦƫ ŸȵƗƧμơƤ. ǎƟ μȱƟƦơƜ ƦơʎƤ ƾƟƦƜƖƣȯƨơƜƤ ǤƟ ƨȱƣƘƦƔƜ ƝƔȴ ƝơƜƟȲ ƾƟȯƖƟƫƥƜƤ ǤƟ; sch. Eur. Phoen. 1759 †ǤƟ: ǢμƚƟ ȏƢʀƣƩơƟ; sch. Eur. Alc. 655; sch. Ar. Plut. 77Ɣ, ƕ, Ɩ; Su. ƚ 5; 1 lm. add. Papageorgiou prob. Bernardakis 59 qui affert sch. OC 973; ǤƟ pro Ǥ habuisse grammaticum censet Nauck 431

130

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

414b (ƥƐƛƘƟ): ƘǮƝʁ ǿμƜƞơƯƥƚƤ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. addidi

415 (ǯƥƦơƣơƯμƘƟơƤ): ǎƣƫƦưμƘƟơƤ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 cf. sch. 382b1; sch. OT 1144; sch. OC 36; Hesych. Ɯ 1028 ǯƥƦơƣƘʎŭ … ǎƣƫƦɲ…; Thom. Mag. Ecl. 187, 1–2 ǯƥƦơƣʬŭ … ƢơƜƚƦƜƝʬƤ Ʀȶ ǎƣƫƦʬ 1 lm. add. Elmsley

416a1 ƝƔȴ ƖȮƣ ơȎ ƥƜƖƚƞȶƤ ƘǴ : ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƥƜƖƚƞƑŭ ơȎ ƥƜƫƢɲƤ, ƨƚƥƒ, ƢƣȴƟ ǀƟ μƏƛɾƤ ȃ ƦƜ ƕơƯƞƘƜ. L Ts.l. 1 ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƥƜƖƚƞƑ: vide ad sch. 207–8c 1 lm. deest in T ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƥƜƖƚƞȲ] nam v. 415 Deianirae esse putavit grammaticus ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ om. T ơȎ ƥƜƫƢɲƤ, ƨƚƥƒ, om. T

416a2 (ƝƔȴ ƖȮƣ ơȎ ƥƜƖƚƞȶƤ ƘǴ ): ƾƟƦȴ ƢơƞƞȮ ƨƞƧƔƣƑƥƘƜƤ ƘǮƤ ǟμɱƤ. L 1 lm. addidi

419a ơȒƝơƧƟ ƥȸ ƦƔƯƦƚƟ : ơȎ ƥƯ, ƨƚƥƒ, ƦƔƯƦƚƟ ǡƟ ƢƣơƥƢơƜʁ ƾƖƟơƘʎƟ ǒƞƘƖƘƤ ƘǴƟƔƜ ǶƮƞƚƟ; L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 419–20 ơȒƝơƧƟ – ǒƨƔƥƝƘƤ ordine T

419b (ǡƟ ȏƢŪ ƾƖƟơƒƔƤ ǿƣɲƤ): ǡƟ ƾƖƟơƘʎƤ. L 1 lm. add. Elmsley

2 ƘǴƟƔƜ ǶƮƞƚƟ] inverso

sch. 414b – sch. 434–5b

131

425 ƦƔȎƦȶ ƗŪ ơȎƩȴ ƖƒƖƟƘƦƔƜ : ơȎ ƦƔȎƦƮƟ ǎƥƦƜ ƗƮƝƚƥƜƤ ƝƔȴ ƾƞƚƛȲƤ ƞƮƖơƤŭ ƛƐƞƘƜ ƗȰ ƘǮƢƘʎƟ ȃƦƜ ƝƾƖȺ ǢƝơƧƥƔ. L T 1 lm. deest in T

(lm.) ƖƒƖƟƘƦƔƜ Papageorgiou: ƖƒƟƘƦƔƜ L; accuratiss. 425–6 ƦƔȎƦȶ –

ƞƮƖơƟ

434 ǃƟƛƣƫƢơƤ, ȥ ƗƐƥƢơƜƟŪ, ƾƢơƥƦƑƦƫ : ƢƘƣƜƥƥȲ ǟ ƾƢƮŭ Ǡ ƖƣƏƨƘƦƔƜ ƢƔƣƥƦƑƦƫ, ơǵơƟ ǿ ǂƟƛƣƫƢơƤ ƥƦƑƦƫ ƢƔƣƘƞƛȺƟ ƘǮƤ μƐƥơƟ ǿ ƗƜƘƞƐƖƩƫƟ μƘ. L 1 Ɩƣ. L

434–5a Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ | ƟơƥơʝƟƦƜ ƞƚƣƘʎƟ : ƾƟƦȴ ƨƞƧƔƣƘʎƟ ƝƔƜ ƾƗơƞƘƥƩƘʎƟŭ ƟơƥơʝƟƦƜ ƗȰ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƟơƥơƯƥɾ ȏƢȶ ƙƚƞơƦƧƢƒƔƤ. ƾƣƥƘƟƜƝʬƤ ƗȰ ƘǴƢƘƟ, ɒ ƝƔƛƮƞơƧ ǿ ƞƮƖơƤ ƝƔȴ μȲ ƗƮƠɾ ƔȎƦȲƟ ƗƜƘƞƐƖƩƘƜƟ ơȓƦƫ. L T 1 ƨƞƧƔƣƘʎƟ: cf. sch. Ar. Plut. 23e ƞʀƣơƤ] ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ «ƞƚƣƘʎƤ», ȃ ǎƥƦƜ «ƨƞƧƔƣƘʎƤ»; id. Nub. 367a,b; Su. ƞ 467 ƞƚƣƘʎƤ: ƨƞƧƔƣƘʎƤ...; Thom. Mag. Ecl. 221, 10 ƞƚƣʬŭ ƝƔȴ ƨƞƧƔƣʬ; 1 lm. deest in T 1 ƾƟƦȴ – 2 ƙƚƞơƦƧƢƒƔƤ om. T 2 ƟơƥơƯƥɾ Nauck 432 ƾƣƥƘƟƜƝʬƤ – fin.] haec ita reformavit T: ƝƔƛơƞƜƝʬƤ ƦȶƟ ƞȷƖơƟ ǎƢȳƖƔƖƘƟ dzƟƔ μȲ ƗȷƠɾ ƔȎƦȲƟ ƗƜƘƞȱƖƩƘƜƟ ƝƔȴ ƾƣƥƘƟƜƝʬƤ ƢƣơƨȱƣƘƜ ƞȱƖƫƟ ɒ Nauck 432 prob. Bernardakis 60, cf. retractationem in T: Ǡ L, quo retento pro ƝƔȴ μȲ coni. μȲ ƝƔȴ Papageorgiou, ȟƤ μȲ Lascaris

434–5b (ǃƟƛƣƫƢơƤ – ƥưƨƣơƟơƤ): Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ μƔƜƟơμƐƟʪ ƥƧμƨƞƧƔƣƘʎƟ ƾƟƗƣƮƤ ǎƥƦƜƟ ơȎ ƥưƨƣơƟơƤ. ƢƣơƥƦƑƦƫ ơȔƟ, ƨƚƥƒƟ, ǿ ǂƟƛƣƫƢơƤŭ ơȎ ƖȮƣ ƨƜƞơƟƘƜƝƑƥƫ ƢƣȶƤ ƔȎƦƮƟ. L T 1–3 haec a sch. pr. separavi et lm. instruxi; vide Xenis 1 Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ μƔƜƟơμƐƟʪ ƥƧμƨƞƧƔƣƘʎƟ] Ʀȶ ƥƧμƨƞƧƔƣƘʎƟ Ʀʭ ƟơƥơʝƟƦƜ ƝƔȴ ơǵơƟ μƔƜƟơμƐƟʪ T 2 ơȎ] ơȎƩȴ T ƢƣơƥƦƑƦƫ] ƢƔƣƔƥƦƑƦƫ haesitans Papageorgiou coll. sch. 434: ƾƢơƥƦƑƦƫ ut apud poetam Zielinski 54 ƨƚƥƒƟ om. T 3 ƨƜƞơƟƘƜƝƑƥƫ T (Lascaris): ƨƜƞơƟƘƜƝƑƥơƜ L

132

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

441–2 (ǚƣƫƦƜ – ƨƣơƟƘʎ ): ƘȎƑƛƚƤ ƖȮƣ ȃƥƦƜƤ ƢƣơƥƗơƝɲ ƾƟƦƜƢƧƝƦƘʝƥƔƜ Ʀʭ ǒƣƫƦƜ. L T 1 lm. addidi post ƘȎƑƛƚƤ add. ƨƚƥƒƟ ǎƥƦƜƟ omisso ƖȮƣ Ƈ

444 (Ɲƾμơʝ ): ƾƢȶ ƝơƜƟơʝ Ʀȶ ǂƣƩƘƜ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Papageorgiou; accuratiss. vv. 443–4 ǂƣƩƘƜ ƝƔȴ ƛƘʬƟ … Ɲƾμơʝ

446a [ƞƚƨƛƐƟƦƜ] μƘμƢƦƮƤ ƘǮμƜ : μƘμƢƦƑ ƘǮμƜ, ƦơƧƦƐƥƦƜƟ ƾƘȴ μƐμƨơμƔƜ. L 1 de forma μƘμƢƦƮƤ pro μƘμƢƦƑ usurpata vide ad sch. 207–8c 1 lm. decurtavit Lascaris

446b (μƘμƢƦƮƤ): [Ǡ] ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǎƢƒμƘμƢƦơƤ, ǎƢƜƢƞƚƝƦƜƝƑ. L 1 haec a sch. pr. separavi

lm. addidi Ǡ delevi

449 ƾƞƞŪ ƘǮ μȰƟ ǎƝ ƝƘƒƟơƧ μƔƛưƟ : ƘǮ μȰƟ ƢƔƣŪ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ ǎƝƘƞƘƯƥƛƚƤ ƪƘƯƥƔƥƛƔƜ, ƝƔƝȲƟ μƏƛƚƥƜƟ ǎƝμƔƟƛƏƟƘƜƤŭ ƘǮ ƗȰ ƥȸ ƥƔƧƦȶƟ ƘǮƤ ƦơʝƦơ ƪƘƧƗơƞơƖƒƔƤ ǂƖƘƜƤ, DzƥƛƜ ȃƦƜ ƝǀƟ ƛƘƞƑƥɾƤ ƢơƦȰ ƘǮƢƘʎƟ ƾƞƚƛƐƤ, ơȎ ƗƧƟƑƥɾ ȏƢȶ ƦʀƤ ƥƧƟƚƛƘƒƔƤ ƟƜƝưμƘƟơƤ Ǡ ƝǀƟ ƛƐƞɾƤ ƾƞƚƛƘʝƥƔƜ, ơȎ 5 ƢƜƥƦƘƧƛƑƥɾ. L T 1 lm. deest in Ƈ; accuratiss. vv. 449–452 ƾƞƞŪ ƘǮ – ƝƔƝȶƤ ante ƘǮ add. ƾƞƞŪ Ƈ post ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ add. ƨƚƥƒƟ Ƈ 2 iuxta verba ƝƔƝȲƟ μƏƛƚƥƜƟ ǎƝμƔƟƛƏƟƘƜƤ in margine praebet ƥƚμƘƒƫƥƔƜ (per compendium) L 3 ƾƞƚƛƐƤ] ƦƾƞƚƛƐƤ Blaydes 294 4 post Ǡ add. ȃƦƜ Ƈ ƛƐƞɾƤ] ƛƘƞƑƥɾƤ Ƈ

133

sch. 441–2 – sch. 460

454a1 (ƝƑƣ): μƘƣƒƤ, ƝƞʀƣơƤ, μơʎƣƔ, ƦƯƩƚ. L Ts.l. 1 μơʎƣƔ: sch. D. Hom. Il. 8.73 ƝʀƣƘƤ: ƟʝƟ μơʎƣƔƜ; aliter sch. Eur. Hipp. 223 …ƝȲƣ ƖȮƣ ǟ ƛƔƟƔƦƚƨƮƣơƤ μơʎƣƔ; id. Phoen. 950; sch. D Hom. Il. 3.32; Hesych. Ƙ 3148; Ɔ Ɲ 318 Ɲƚƣŭ … ƛƔƟƔƦƚƨƮƣơƤ μơʎƣƔ… = Phot. Ɲ 672 = Su. Ɲ 1530 1 lm. add. Brunck2

ƝƞʀƣơƤ, μơʎƣƔ om. Ƈ

454a2 (ƝƑƣ): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƦƜμƑ. L 1 error scholiastae tribuendus

455 (ȃƢƫƤ…, ơȎƗȰ … ): ƾƦƦƜƝȲ [ƗȰ] ǟ ƨƣƏƥƜƤ. L 1 haec a sch. pr. separavi; cf. sch. 750–2; etiam Kamerbeek ad loc.

ƗȰ delevi

458 (Ʀȶ μȲ ƢƧƛƐƥƛƔƜ, ƦơʝƦƮ μŪ ƾƞƖƯƟƘƜƘƟ ǂƟ): ƞƧƢƚƛƑƥơμƔƜ, ƘǮ μȲ ƘDzƢɾƤ, ƝƔȴ ƢƔƣŪ ǎμơʝ ƢƣơƥƗƮƝƔ ƕƞƔƕƑƥƘƥƛƔƜ. L 1 ƞƧƢƚƛƑƥơμƔƜ: cf. sch. Aesch. Th. 358h, k, l; Hesych. Ɣ 2804 ƾƞƖƯƟƘƜŭ ƞƧƢƘʎ…; ibid. Ɣ 2805; 1–2 haec a praecedentibus seiunxit Papageorgiou modo cf. sch. 587.1; vide ad sch. El. 86a.9

1 lm. addidi

1–2 ƘǮ μȲ ƘDzƢɾƤ] de

460 ƾƟȲƣ ƘǵƤ : ƦƜƟȰƤ , ƾƟƏƟƗƣơƧƤ, ƢƔƣƛƐƟơƧƤ, ȟƤ ƀƑƗƔƟ ƦȲƟ ƉƯƞƔƟƦơƤ, ŵȒƖƚƟ ƦȲƟ džƞƘơʝ, ƀƘƖƏƣƔƟ ƦȲƟ žƣƐơƟƦơƤ, ƦȮƤ żƘƥƦƒơƧ ƛƧƖƔƦƐƣƔƤ, džƥƦƧƗƏμƘƜƔƟ ƦȲƟ džμƯƟƦơƣơƤ. L T 1 : cf. Et. Gen. Ɣ 859 unde EM 108, 6 et Et. Sym. s. v. ƾƟƑƣƘƜƤ; Zonar. 172, 14; aliter Hesych. Ɣ 5080 ƾƟȳƣƚƤŭ †ƾƟƗƣȻƗƚƤ, · ŵǮƥƩȹƞơƤ ƆƔƞƔμƜƟȵƔƜƤ (fr. 218); EM 108, 5

134

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

1 lm. ƾƟȲƣ ƘǵƤ L: deest in Ƈ: ƾƟƑƣƘƜƤ pro ƾƟȲƣ ƘǵƤ legisse scholiastam coni. Bergk lviii et Dindorf 71 ƾƟƑƣƘƜƤ post ƦƜƟȰƤ addidi praeeunte Nauck 432 qui suppleverat ƾƟƏƟƗƣơƧƤ] ƦơȸƤ ƾƟ. Ƈ post ƾƟƏƟƗƣơƧƤ add. Ǡ ƩƑƣƔƤ Ǡ Nauck 432 coll. EM 108, 6 post ƢƔƣƛƐƟơƧƤ add. ƨƔƥȴƟ Ƈ 2 džƞƘơʝ Papageorgiou ex Apollodoro (e.g. II 146): džƞƐơƧ (hoc accentu) LT żƘƥƦƒơƧ] żƘƥƢƒơƧ Papageorgiou quasi ex Apollodoro (II 165), sed Apollodori codd. żƘƥƦƒơƧ praebent; error fortasse scholiastae tribuendus

462–3 ǣƗƘ ƦŪ ơȎƗŪ ǂƟ, ƘǮ | ƝƏƣƦƔ : ơȎƗȰ ǟ ǶƮƞƚ ǾƟƘƜƗƜƥƛƑƥƘƦƔƜ, ơȎƗŪ ƘǮ μƘƖƏƞƫƤ ƔȎƦʀƤ ǎƣɲ ǿ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ. L T 1 lm. deest in Ƈ; accuratiss. vv. 462–3 ǣƗƘ ƦŪ ơȎƗŪ ǀƟ – Ʀʭ ƨƜƞƘʎƟ post ǶƮƞƚ add. ƨƚƥȴƟ Ƈ post ǾƟƘƜƗƜƥƛƑƥƘƦƔƜ add. ȏƢŪ ǎμơʝ Ƈ ơȎƗŪ ƘǮ] ơȎƗȰ ƘǮ Ƈ 2 post ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ add. ƝƔȴ ǎƝƦƔƝƘƒƚ ǎƟ Ʀʭ ƔȎƦʀƤ ǒƣƫƦƜ Ƈ

463 (Ʀʭ ƨƜƞƘʎƟ): Ʀʭ ƨƜƞƘʎƟ ƔȎƦȲƟ ǿ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ. L; cf. gll. in Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris plura Ƈ

Ʀʭ – fin.] ǿ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ gl. ad ǎƟƦƔƝƘƒƚ, ƔȎƦȲƟ gl. ad ƨƜƞƘʎƟ nec

467–8 ƾƞƞȮ ƦƔʝƦƔ μȰƟ | ʜƘƒƦƫ ƝƔƦŪ ơȔƣơƟ : ǿ ƢƘƣȴ ƦơƯƦƫƟ ƞƮƖơƤ ǎƣƣƒƨƛƫ, ƨƚƥƒƟ, ƘǮƤ ƦȶƟ ƾƐƣƔ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. deest in Ƈ

ǿ ƢƘƣȴ ƦơƯƦƫƟ ƞƮƖơƤ post ƨƚƥƒƟ (2) transp. Ƈ

469 (ƢƣȶƤ ƗŪ ǒμŪ ƾƪƘƧƗƘʎƟ ƾƘƒ ): oȎƝ ǎƣʬ ƖȮƣ Ʀʭ ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. addidi; haec scholio 467–8 continuant Wolff 190 et Kruytbosch 45

135

sch. 460 – sch. 483

470 ƢƘƒƛơƧ ƞƘƖơƯƥɾ ƩƣƚƥƦƏ : ƢƘƒƥƛƚƦƜ, ƨƚƥƒƟ· ǿƣɲƤ ƖȮƣ ȃƦƜ ƨƜƞƔƟƛƣưƢƫƤ ǿμƜƞƘʎ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. deest in Ƈ

1–2 post ƨƜƞƔƟƛƣưƢƫƤ add. ƥơƜ Ƈ

473 (ƾƖƟưμơƟƔ): ƾƥƯƟƘƦơƟ. Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

475 ȣƥƢƘƣ ơȕƦơƤ ǎƟƟƐƢƘƜ : ǿ ǎƟ Ʀʭ ƞƘƜμʬƟƜ ƾƝƚƝơȺƤ ƝƔȴ ƾƢƔƖƖƘƒƞƔƤ Ʀʁ ŸƚƜƔƟƘƒƣɯ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. deest in T

1–2 Ʀʁ ŸƚƜƔƟƘƒƣɯ om. T

479–80a (ƝƔȴ ƦƔʝƦƔ…) ơȒƦŪ ƘǴƢƘ ƝƣƯƢƦƘƜƟ : Ʀȶ ǏƠʀƤŭ ƝƔȴ ƦƔʝƦƔ ơȒƦŪ ƘǴƢƘ ƝƣƯƢƦƘƜƟ. L T 1 lm. L supplevi: deest in T de T vide ad 479–80b.1–2

479–80b (ƝƔȴ ƦƔʝƦƔ – ƢơƦƐ ): ƦȮ ƢƘƣȴ Ʀơʝ ǒƣƫƦơƤ, ƨƚƥƒ, ƦʀƤ ǶƮƞƚƤ ơȒƦƘ ƝƣƯƢƦƘƜƟ μơƜ ǿ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ ƘǴƢƘƟ ơȒƦƘ μȲƟ ǿμơƞơƖƘʎƟ. L T 1–2 haec cum sch. pr. coniuncta in L separatim collocavi; sch. 479–80a et b ita rescripsit T: ƝƔȴ ƦƔʝƦƔ, ƨƚƥƒƟ, ơȒƦƘ ƘǴƢƘ ƝƣƯƢƦƘƜƟ, ƦȮ ƢƘƣȴ Ʀơʝ ǒƣƫƦơƤ ƞƐƖƫ ƦʀƤ ǶƮƞƚƤ, ơȒƦƘ ǿμơƞơƖƘʎƟ 1 lm. addidi 2 μȲƟ] μȲ proposuit Blaydes 107, perperam

483 (ǣμƔƣƦơƟ,) ƘDz ƦƜ ƦƑƟƗŪ ƿμƔƣƦƒƔƟ ƟƐμƘƜƤ : ƝƔƞʬƤ ƗƜȮ ƦʀƤ ƞƐƠƘƫƤ ƥƧƖƖƟưμƚƟ ǏƔƧƦʭ ƢƣơƠƘƟƘʎƦƔƜ. L T 1 lm. L supplevi: deest in T (lm.) ƦʀƟƗŪ hoc accentu L ǣμƔƣƦƮƟ ƨƚμƜ T 2 ƢƣơƠƘƟƘʎƦƔƜ] ƢƣơƠƘƟƘʎ T

post ƞƐƠƘƫƤ add. Ʀơʝ

136

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

484 ǎƢƘƒ ƖƘ μȰƟ ƗȲ ƢƏƟƦŪ ǎƢƒƥƦƔƥƔƜ : ǎƢƘȴ ƦơƒƟƧƟ ƢƏƟƦƔ ƞƮƖơƟ ǎƢƒƥƦƔƥƔƜ, ƞƐƖƫ ƦƜ ƝƔȴ ǓƦƘƣơƟ ȃƢƘƣ ǿμơƒƫƤ ƝƘƩƔƣƜƥμƐƟơƟ ƥơƒ ƦƘ ƝƔȴ Ʀʭ ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ ƖƘƟƑƥƘƦƔƜ. L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 484–5 ǎƢƘƒ – ƩƏƣƜƟ ƞơƜƢȶƟ L

ƦơƒƟƧƟ] ƨƚƥȴ T

ƞƮƖơƟ T:

489 (Ʀơʝ ƦʀƥƗŪ ǒƣƫƦơƤ ƘǮƤ ǃƢƔƟƛŪ ǣƥƥƫƟ ǒƨƧ): ơǵơƟ ǟƦƦɱƦƔƜ Ʀʭ ƦƔȹƦƚƤ ǒƣƫƦƜ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. addidi

490 (ƦƔʝƦƔ): ȣƥƢƘƣ ƢƣơƘƒƣƚƝƔ, ƦƔʝƦƔ ƢơƜƑƥƫ. L Ts.l. ‘duo membra ȣƥƢƘƣ ƢƣơƘƒƣƚƝƔ et ƦƔʝƦƔ ƢơƜƑƥƫ non recte sibi respondent... Fortasse tamen talis inconcinnitas orationis scholiastae reliquenda’

1 lm. addidi

Kruytbosch 46 ƦƔʝƦƔ ƢơƜƑƥƫ] ơȓƦƫ ƢơƜƑƥƫ ƦƔʝƦƔ T, recepit Brunck1: ƦƔʝƦƔ ƢơƜƑƥƫ Kruytbosch l.c. ‘si vero quid mutandum sit’ malim ǃƢƘƣ ... ƦƔʝƦƔ si quid mutandum sit

491a1 ƟƮƥơƟ : ƦȲƟ ƛƘơμƔƩƒƔƟ, ǎƢƔƝƦȷƟ ƗȰ ǎƟƦƔʝƛƔ ƾƟƦȴ ƔȎƛƔƒƣƘƦơƟ. L T 1 ǎƟƦƔʝƛƔ: aliter ǎƢƔƝƦƮƤ explicatur in sch. 259 ƔȎƛƔƒƣƘƦơƟ: cf. sch. Eur. Phoen. 339 (ad ƖƏμƫƟ ǎƢƔƝƦȶƟ ǂƦƔƟ) ...ƝƔȴ ǂƦƚƟ ƖȯμƫƟ ƔȎƛƔȵƣƘƦơƟ, ƦơƧƦȱƥƦƜƟ ǡƟ ƔȎƦȶƤ ƥƘƔƧƦʭ ǎƢƚƖȯƖơƧ... 1 lm. sic T: ƝơȒƦơƜ ƟƮƥơƟ ǎƢƔƝƦƮƟ L T

post ƛƘơμƔƩƒƔƟ add. ƞƐƖƘƜ T

ƾƟƦȴ] ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ

491a2 (ƟƮƥơƟ): ƦȲƟ ƛƘơμƔƩƒƔƟŭ Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ ƢƣȶƤ ǎƣʬƟƦƔ ƨƜƞơƟƘƜƝƘʎƟ ƛƘơμƔƩƘʎƟ ǎƥƦƜƟ ǂƟƦƜƝƣƧƤ. L T 1–2 haec a sch. 491a1 separavi 1 lm. addidi T ǎƣʬƟƦƔ L: ǒƣƫƦƔ T (Lascaris)

ƦȲƟ ƛƘơμƔƩƒƔƟ om. T

ƢƣȶƤ] Ƣƣ. ƦȶƟ

sch. 484 – sch. 497d

137

494 ǃ ƦŪ ƾƟƦȴ ƗưƣƫƟ ƗʬƣƔ : ȃƢƫƤ ǀƟ ƔȎƦʭ ƢƔƣŪ ǟμʬƟ ƝơμƒƥɾƤ ƾƟƦƒƢơƜƟƔ ƝƔȴ ƥƯμƨƫƟƔ ơǵƤ ǢƖƔƖƘƤŭ ƞƐƖƘƜ ƗȰ ƾƟƦȴ ƦʬƟ ƔǮƩμƔƞưƦƫƟ. L Ƈ 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 494–5 ǃ ƦŪ ƾƟƦȴ – ǂƖɾƤ post ǀƟ add. ƨƚƥȴƟ T

496 (ƥƦƮƞʪ): ƦƔʎƤ ƾƢƘƥƦƔƞμƐƟƔƜƤ ƔǮƩμƔƞưƦơƜƤ. L 1 lm. addidi ƦƔʎƤ ƾƢƘƥƦƔƞμƐƟƔƜƤ La.c. (hoc commendat Wansink 100 coll. sch. 531.2–3): ƦơʎƤ ƾƢƘƥƦƔƞμƐƟơƜƤ Lp.c.

497a (μƐƖƔ ƦƜ ƥƛƐƟơƤ ƿ ): ƖƣƏƨƘƦƔƜ μƐƖƔ ƦƜ ƥƛƐƟơƧƥƔ. L 1 lm. addidi Ɩƣ. L

497b (μƐƖƔ ƦƜ ƥƛƐƟơƤ ƿ žƯƢƣƜƤ): ƘǮƝƮƦƫƤ ǿ ƩơƣȶƤ ƦơƜƔƯƦƚƟ ƾƣƩȲƟ ƢƘƢơƒƚƦƔƜŭ ƢƘƢơƒƚƦƔƜ ƖȮƣ ǿ ƞƮƖơƤ ƢƘƣȴ Ʀơʝ ǒƣƫƦơƤ. L T 1 lm. addidi 2 ƢƘƢơƒƚƦƔƜŭ ƢƘƢơƒƚƦƔƜ scripsi post Kruytbosch 46 (ƢơƜƘʎƦƔƜŭ ƢƘƢơƒƚƦƔƜ): ƢƘƢơƒƚƦƔƜŭ ƢƐƢƔƧƦƔƜ codd. ƢƘƣȴ] ǿ Ƣ. T

497c ƥƛƐƟơƤ [ƗȰ] ƟƒƝƚƤ ŭ ƢƘƣƜƨƣƔƥƦƜƝʬƤ ƦȲƟ ƟƒƝƚƟ. L T 1 hoc sch. a sch. 497d deleto ƗȰ separavi; nam diversis a grammaticis orta esse conicias; alter (sch. d) ƟƒƝƔƤ pro accusativo habuit, alter (sch. c) pro genetivo post ƟƒƝƚƟ add. ƨƚƥȵƟ T

497d ǎƝƨƐƣƘƦƔƜ ƟƒƝƔƤ ƾƘƒ : ƟƜƝƚƨơƣƘʎ ǎƟ ƢƔƟƦȴ ƢƣƏƖμƔƦƜ. Ǡ ơȓƦƫƤŭ ƾƢơƨƐƣƘƦƔƜ ƦȮƤ ƟƒƝƔƤ ƝƔƦȮ ƢƏƟƦƫƟ ƝƔȴ ƢƏƥƚƤ ƝƣƔƦƘʎ ƨƯƥƘƫƤ. L T 1 lm. scripsi: μƐƖƔ ƦƜ ƥƛƐƟơƤ L: deest in T, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 497b conectat praefixis ƝƔȴ ƨƚƥȴ; pars ƝƔƦȮ (2) – fin. vv. 499–506 respicit post ƢƣƏƖμƔƦƜ add. ǟ žƯƢƣƜƤ T ơȓƦƫƤ om. T 2 ƾƢơƨƐƣƘƦƔƜ ƦȮƤ ƟƒƝƔƤ inverso ordine T ƝƔƦȮ om. T

138

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

497e (ǎƝƨƐƣƘƦƔƜ): ƾƢơƨƐƣƘƦƔƜ. L 1 lm. add. Elmsley

500 (ƢƔƣƐƕƔƟ): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƢƔƣƔƕƑƥơμƔƜ. ƝƔȴ ȃƥƔ μȱƟ, ƨƚƥƒƟ, ƘǮƤ ƛƘơȸƤ ǎƟƘƗƘƒƠƔƦơ ȏƢƘƣƕƑƥơμƔƜ. Ls.l. Ts.l.; cf. etiam gl. in Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Brunck2; (ƢƔƣƐƕƔƟ s.) L; pars ƝƔȴ ȃƥƔ (1) – fin. ad ƝƔȴ ƦȮ μȰƟ ƛƘʬƟ ƢƔƣƐƕƔƟ spectat ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƢƔƣƔƕƑƥơμƔƜ] om. T in margine sed praebuit ƢƔƣƔƕƑƥơμƔƜ ut gl. ad ƢƔƣƐƕƔƟ ƝƔȴ om. T; fortasse verba ƝƔȴ – fin. novum scholium sunt

501 (ƦȶƟ ǒƟƟƧƩơƟ): ƦȶƟ ǎƟ ƥƝƮƦʪ ƗƜƔƦƣƒƕơƟƦƔ. L Ts.l. 1 cf. sch. OC. 1558 ǎƟƟƧƩƒƫƟ] ƦʬƟ ǎƟ ƟƧƝƦȴ ƾƘȴ ƝƔȴ ƥƝƮƦʪ ƗƜƔƦƣƜƕƮƟƦƫƟ, ƦƘƛƟƚƝƮƦƫƟ 1 lm. add. Brunck2

503 ƾƞƞŪ ǎƢȴ ƦƏƟƗŪ ǂƣŪ ǂƝơƜƦƜƟ : ƦȲƟ ŸƚƜƏƟƘƜƣƔƟ. ǿ ƗȰ ƟơʝƤ ơȓƦƫŭ ƦȮ μȰƟ ƘǮƤ ƛƘơȸƤ ƖƘƖơƟƮƦƔ ƢƔƣƒƚμƜ, ǎƝƘʎƟƔ ƗȰ ƞƐƖƫ, ƦƒƟƘƤ ǞƖƫƟƒƥƔƟƦơ ƢƘƣȴ ƦʬƟ ƖȯμƫƟ ŸƚƜƔƟƘƒƣƔƤ ƝƔȴ ƝƔƦƐƕƚƥƔƟ ƘǮƤ ƦȶƟ ƾƖʬƟƔ. L T 1 lm. deest in Ƈ; pars ǿ ƗȰ ƟơʝƤ (1) – fin. ad vv. 500–6 ƾƞƞŪ – ƾƖưƟƫƟ (lm.) DŽƣŪ L ƦȲƟ ŸƚƜƏƟƘƜƣƔƟ – ơȓƦƫ om. Ƈ ơȓƦƫ] ơȕƦơƤ Lascaris prob. Nauck 432 2 post ƛƘơȸƤ add. ƨƚƥȴ Ƈ ƦƒƟƘƤ Ƈ: ƦƜƟȰƤ (ut apud poetam) L

504 ƾμƨƒƖƧơƜ : ƾƟƦƒƢƔƞơƜ Ǡ ǮƥƩƧƣơȴ ǎƟ ƦơʎƤ ƖƧơƜƤ, μƔƩƘƥƏμƘƟơƜ ƩƘƣƥȴ ƝƔȴ ƢơƥƒƟ Ǡ ƾμƨƮƦƘƣơƜ ƦƘƛƫƣƔƝƜƥμƐƟơƜ Ǡ ǂμƨƫ ƢƔƣƫƠƧμμƐƟơƜ. L T 1 cf. sch. Hom. Il. 13.147a {ƟȹƥƥơƟƦƘƤ ƠȵƨƘƥȵƟ ƦƘ ƝƔȴ ǒƖƩƘƥƜƟ} ƾμƨƜƖȹơƜƥƜƟ: ƢƣȶƤ Ʀȶ ƾμƨƜƖȹơƜƥƜƟ, ȃƦƜ ơǯ μȱƟ, ǎƢƘȴ ƾμƨơƦȱƣƔƜƤ ƦƔʎƤ ƩƘƣƥȴ ƗƜƘƣƘȵƗơƟƦƘƤ ƩƣʬƟƦƔƜ, ơǯ ƗȰ ƾƢȶ Ʀơʝ ƖƧʬƥƔƜ, ȃƦƜ ƕƞȯƢƦƘƜ ƾμƨơƦȱƣƫƛƘƟ. ơǯ ƗȰ μƘƦƔƨơƣƜƝʬƤ ƾƢȶ ƦʬƟ ƖƧȵƫƟ, ȃƦƜ

sch. 497e – sch. 506

139

ǏƝƔƦȱƣƫƛƘƟ ǂƝƣơƟ ǒƩƘƜ· ƖƧʎƔ ƖȮƣ ƦȮ ǂƝƣƔ 1–2 ƖƧơƜƤ ... ƩƘƣƥȴ ƝƔȴ ƢơƥƒƟ: cf. Apollon. S. 55, 27 ƝƧƣƒƫƤ ƢƮƗƘƤ ƝƔȴ ƩƘʎƣƘƤ 1 lm. sic T: ƾμƨƒƖƧơƜ Ƣƣȶ ƖƏμƫƟ ƝƔƦƐƕƔƟ L ƾƟƦƒƢƔƞơƜ] ƝƔȴ ƾƟƦ. T ƖƧơƜƤ Brunck2: ƖƯơƜƤ codd. (cf. ad sch. 636.2; sch. El. 95.2 ƁƘƝƧƒɯ Lascaris: ƁƘƝƯƔ codd.) 2 ƦƘƛƫƣƔƝƜƥμƐƟơƜ Lascaris (quasi ab ƖƯƔƞơƟ originem ducat): ƦƘƛƘƫƣƚμƐƟơƜ L, defendit Wansink 101, «ƦƘƛƘƫƣƚμƐƟơƧƤ ... fuisse ambos heroes, et Hercules et Achelous, apparet ex vv. 22sq: ƾƞƞŪ ȃƥƦƜƤ ǤƟ | ƛƔƝʬƟ ƾƦƔƣƕȲƤ ƦʀƤ ƛƐƔƤ, ȃƗŪ ǀƟ ƞƐƖơƜ»: ƦƘƛƫƣƚƖμƐƟơƜ Bernardakis 61: ƦƘƛƘƣμƔƥμƐƟơƜ Zielinski 54: ƦƘƛƧμƫμƐƟơƜ temptavi (cf. ƢƔƣƫƠƧμμƐƟơƜ)

505–6 ǎƠ-|ʀƞƛơƟ [ǂƘƛƞƔ]: ƾƟƦƒ Ʀơʝ ƗƜƑƟƧƥƔƟ, ǎƢƘƠʀƞƛơƟ, ǞƖƫƟƒƥƔƟƦơ. ƞƐƖƘƜ ƗȰ ȃƦƜ ƢɱƟ ƘǴƗơƤ ƾƖƫƟƒƥμƔƦơƤ ƝƔƦŪ ƾƞƞƑƞƫƟ ǎƟƘƗƘƒƠƔƟƦơ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. L decurtavit Brunck2: deest in T; ǎƠʀƞƛơƟ in ǎƠʀƟơƟ mutavit Wakefield et Wunder3 107 (et in Censura Aiac. ab Lobeck. iterum edit. 52 sq.) prob. Wolff 51 qui porro annotat: ‘quod [i.e. ǎƠʀƟơƟ] ipsum vetus interpres videtur legisse, dicens ƗƜƑƟƧƥƘƟ (sic), ǞƖƫƟƒƥƔƟƦơ... His tamen glossis posterior interpres alienum verbum ƗƜƘƠʀƞƛơƟ (sic) immiscuit, quod ad vulgatam lectionem pertinet’; pars ƞƐƖƘƜ (2) – fin. ad v. 505 ƢƏμƢƞƚƝƦƔ ƢƔƖƝƮƟƜƦƏ ƦŪ pertinet ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ om. T ǎƢƘƠʀƞƛơƟ om. T 2 ƞƐƖƘƜ – fin.] fortasse haec ab praecedentibus seiungenda sunt

506 (ǂƘƛƞŪ ): ƾƖƫƟƒƥμƔƦƔŭ ƢƏμƢƞƚƝƦƔ ƗȰ ƢƞƚƖʬƟ μƘƥƦƏ. L; cf. gl. in Ts.l. 1 ƾƖƫƟƒƥμƔƦƔ: cf. sch. Eur. Phoen. 1262 (ad lm. ƦDŽƛƞƔ): ƦȮ ƾƖƫƟƒƥμƔƦƔ; sch. Pi. O. 1.5a ƘǮ ƗŪ ǂƘƛƞƔ ƖƔƣȹƘƜƟ: DŽƛƞƔ ƟʝƟ ƘDzƣƚƝƘ ƦȮ ƾƖƫƟȵƥμƔƦƔ; ibid. 1.5c; ibid. 2.24a; ibid. 2.78; Philox. fr. **637 (Et. Gud. 32, 6 Stef.); Hesych. Ɣ 1601 DŽƛƞơƟŭ ƾƖưƟƜƥμƔ…; Ɔ Ɣ 153 DŽƛƞơƟŭ ƾƖưƟƜƥμƔ… = Phot. Ɣ 476 = Su. Ɣ 742 1 lm. add. Elmsley

ƢƏμƢƞƚƝƦƔ nec plura T

1 ƾƖƫƟƒƥμƔƦƔ – fin.] ƢƞƚƖʬƟ μƘƥƦƏ ƾƖƫƟƒƥμƔƦƔ gl. ad

140

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

508 (ƦƘƦƣƔƮƣơƧ): ƦƘƦƣƔƥƝƘƞơʝƤ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 cf. Eust. Od. II 40, 16–9 Ʀȶ ƗȰ ȏƪȷƥƘ ƾƘƜƣȷμƘƟơƜ ǎμƨƔȵƟƘƜ ƗȹƟƔƥƛƔƜ ƦƘƦƣƔȷƣơƧƤ ƞȱƖƘƥƛƔƜ, … ȥƟ ǓƝƔƥƦơƤ ƗƜȮ ƦƘƥƥȯƣƫƟ ƢơƗʬƟ ƾƘȵƣƘƦƔƜ, ƝƔƦȮ ƦȶƟ ƘǮƢȷƟƦƔ ƦƣƔƖƜƝƮƟ, ƦƘƦƣƔȷƣơƧ ƨȯƥμƔ ƦƔȹƣơƧ; aliter id. Il. II 128, 10 ƝƔȴ «ƦƘƦƣȯơƣơƟ ƨȯƥμƔ ƦƔȹƣơƧ», ƝƔȴ ƦȱƦƣƫƣơƟ, Ʀȶ ƦƘƦƣȯƙƘƧƝƦơƟ 1 lm. add. Lascaris

509 (ƨƏƥμƔ): ƨƏƟƦƔƥμƔ, ƥƩʀμƔ. L Ts.l. 1 ƨƏƟƦƔƥμƔ: cf. sch. Pi. O. 8.57; Hesych. ƨ 217 1 lm. add. Lascaris

510 ƾƢŪ ƃǮƟƜƔƗɱƟ : ƾƢȶ ŵǮƦƫƞƒƔƤ. Ǡ ơȓƦƫƤŭ ƃǮƟƜƏƗƔƜ ƢƮƞƜƤ džƝƔƣƟƔƟƒƔƤ ƗƜŪ ǥƤ ʜƘʎ ǿ džƩƘƞʭơƤ. ƢƞƚƛƧƟƦƜƝʬƤ ƗȰ ƞƐƖƘƦƔƜ. L T 1 Erot. ơ 6 ƃǮƟƜƏƗƔƜŭ ƢƮƞƜƤ ŵǮƦƫƞƒƔƤ, ƝƘƜμƐƟƚ ƢƔƣȮ ƦƔʎƤ džƩƘƞʪơƧ ƢơƦƔμơʝ ƢƚƖƔʎƤ; Hdn. ƝƔƛ. Ƣƣơƥ. I 346, 31–2 (= Steph. Byz 281, 10–1) ǖƣƧƥȵƩƚŭ ƢȷƞƜƤ džƝƔƣƟƔƟȵƔƤ, ǣƦƜƤ ȓƥƦƘƣơƟ ƃǮƟƜȯƗƔƜ ȞƟơμȯƥƛƚ; Steph. Byz. 485, 15–7 ƃǮƟƘƜȯƗƔƜŭ ƢȷƞƜƤ džƝƔƣƟƔƟȵƔƤ ƢƣȶƤ Ʀʭ džƩƘƞʫʪ ǟ ƝƔȴ ǖƣƧƥȵƩƚ ƝƔƞơƧμȱƟƚ. Ʀȶ ǎƛƟƜƝȶƟ ǖƣƧƥƜƩƔʎơƤ. ƞȱƖƘƦƔƜ ƝƔȴ ƃǮƟƘƜȯƤ ǟ ƩȻƣƔ. ǒƥƦƜ ƝƔȴ ǏƦȱƣƔ ƦʀƤ ƃǮƦƔȵƔƤ ƢȷƞƜƤ ƃǮƟƘƜȯƗƔƜ 1 (lm.) ƃǮƟƘƜƔƗɱƟ (-ƘƜ-) Papageorgiou renuente Nauck 432 ŵǮƦƫƞƒƔƤ] ƃǮƦƔƒƔƤ dubitanter Schmidt 108 ex Steph. Byz. 485, 17 ƃǮƟƜƏƗƔƜ Stiehle: ƃǮƟƒƔƜ LT ƢƮƞƜƤ T et Lp (Ƣơƞ) (Lascaris): ƢƮƞƘƜƤ L

510–1 ŶƔƝƩƘƒƔƤ … żƑƕƔƤ : ƦʀƤ ƦȶƟ ŶƏƝƩơƟ ǎƩơƯƥƚƤŭ ƝƔƞʬƤ ƗȰ Ʀȶ ŶƔƝƩƘƒƔƤ ƢƣȶƤ ƾƟƦƜƗƜƔƥƦơƞƑƟ. L T 2 ƢƣȶƤ ƾƟƦƜƗƜƔƥƦơƞƑƟ] sub nomine ‘Thebae’ novem urbes distinguit Steph. Byz. 312, 15 – 313, 6 1 lm. addidi: ŶƔƝƩƘƒƔƤ T: deest in L

141

sch. 508 – sch. 517–9

512 (ƞƮƖƩƔƤ): ƾƨŪ ǯƥƦơƣƒƔƤ ƨƚƥȴ ƞƮƖƩƚƟ ǒƩƘƜƟ ƦȶƟ ǧƣƔƝƞƐƔ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. addidi

513 ƾơƞƞƘʎƤ : ƝƔƦƔƩƣƚƥƦƜƝʬƤ ƘǴƢƘƟ ǎƢȴ ƗƯơ Ʀȶ ƾơƞƞƘʎƤŭ ǎƢȴ ƢƞƑƛơƧƤ ƖȮƣ ƞƐƖƘƦƔƜ. Ǡ ƾơƞƞƘʎƤ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƞƒƔƟ ƾƞƐƟƦƘƤŭ ȋμƚƣơƤ oDzμƚƥƘƟ ƗȰ ƾƞƘƒƤ. L T 2 ȋμƚƣơƤ: Il. 22.308 1 lm. deest in T ǎƢȴ ƗƯơ] ‘fortasse ǎƢȴ ƗƧơʎƟ’ Ellendt s.v. ƾơƞƞƑƤ ƾƞƐƟƦƔƤ T 3 ƗȰ] ƗŪ Ƈ

2 ƾƞƐƟƦƘƤ]

514 (ǯƐμƘƟơƜ): ǎƢƜƛƧμơʝƟƦƘƤ. L 1 cf. sch. D Hom. Il. 8.241 ǯƐμƘƟơƤ: ǎƢƜƛƧμʬƟ, ƢƣơƛƧμơƯμƘƟơƤ; ibid. 11.168; sch. Hom. Il. 13. 424 … ơǯ ƗȰ μȱƖƔ dzƘƦơ μƘƖȯƞƫƤ ǎƢƘƛȹμƘƜ; sch. Eur. Or. 1304 ...Ǡ Ʀȶ ǯȱμƘƟơƜ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƢƣơƛƧμơȹμƘƟơƜ...; Ɔ Ɯ 22 ǯȱμƘƟơƜŭ ǎƢƜƛƧμơʝƟƦƘƤ = Phot. Ɯ 38; Su. Ɯ 148 ǯƐμƘƟơƜ: ǎƢƜƛƧμơʝƟƦƘƤŭ ƢƣơƛƧμơƯμƘƟơƜ 1 lm. add. Lascaris; (ǯƐμƘƟơƜ s.) L

515–6 (μƮƟƔ ƗŪ ... žƯƢƣƜƤ | ʜƔƕƗơƟƮμƘƜ ƠƧƟơʝƥƔ): μƮƟƚ ƗȰ ǟ žƯƢƣƜƤ ƢƔƣơʝƥƔ ǎƕƣƏƕƘƧƘƟ ƝƔȴ ƗƜƐƦƔƦƦƘƟ. L Ts.l. 2 ǎƕƣƏƕƘƧƘƟ: cf. Hesych. ƣ 5 ʜƏƕƗơƜŭ ... ƝƔȴ ǿ ƕƣƔƕƘƧƦȳƤ, ʜƔƕƗơƟȷμơƤ 1 lm. addidi

517–9 (ƦƮƦŪ ǤƟ ƩƘƣƮƤ – ƝƘƣƏƦƫƟ): ƦƮƦƘ ơȔƟ ǿ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ ƝƔȴ ƩƘƣƥȴ ƝƔȴ ƦƮƠơƜƤ ǎμƏƩƘƦơ, ǿ ƗȰ džƩƘƞʭơƤ ƦơʎƤ ƝƐƣƔƥƜƟ. L T 1 lm. addidi ƦƮƦƘ ơȔƟ om. T post ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ add. μƐƟ ƨƚƥȴ T

142

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

519 (ƾƟƏμƜƖƗƔ): ƾƟƔμƘμƜƖμƐƟƫƤ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris

ƾƟƔμƘμƜƖμƐƟƫƤ] ƾƟƔμƘμƜƖμƐƟƔ T

520a (ǤƟ): ǧƥƒơƗơƤ

ƦʀƤ ƗŪ ǤƟ ƦƣƘʎƤ ƝƘƨƔƞƔƒŭ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ȏƢʀƣƩơƟ. L Ts.l.; cf. etiam gl. in Ts.l. 1 ǧƥƒơƗơƤ: Th. 321 3 ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ȏƢʀƣƩơƟ: cf. Hdn. ǤƟ ŽŽ 786, 1–4 (=Choer. sch. Th. 64, 12–4) ƘǮƝƮƦƫƤ ơȔƟ ƝƔȴ Ʀȶ ƦƣƒƦơƟ ƢƣƮƥƫƢơƟ ƦʬƟ ƢƞƚƛƧƟƦƜƝʬƟ ơȎƝ ǎƟƑƞƞƔƠƘ ƢƣȶƤ Ʀȶ DzƗƜơƟ ƢƣʬƦơƟ ƢƣƮƥƫƢơƟ, ƾƞƞŪ ǎƖƐƟƘƦơ ƝƔȴ ƔȎƦȶ ƗƜȮ Ʀơʝ ƚ «ƦʀƤ ƗŪ ǤƟ ƦƣƘʎƤ ƝƘƨƔƞƔƒ» ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǤƥƔƟ; id. μơƟ. ƞƐƠ. ŽŽ 950, 14–23; sch. Aeschin. 3.184 (ad epigr. verba ǤƟ ǂƣƔ ƝƾƝƘʎƟơƜ ƦƔƞƔƝȯƣƗƜơƜ) ǤƟ] ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǤƥƔƟ.; sch. Ap. Rh. 129, 10-1; Hdn. ʜƚμ. II 792, 5-14 (= sch. Hom. Il. 4.222a) 1 lm. add. Elmsley ǤƟ habet gl. ǤƥƔƟ

2 ƦʀƤ … ǤƟ] ƦơʎƤ … ǤƥƔƟ T

3 ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ȏƢʀƣƩơƟ om. T, sed ad

520b ǤƟ ƗȰ ƾμƨƒƢƞƘƝƦơƜ ƝƞƒμƔƝƘƤ: ƝƞƒμƔƝƘƤ Ɣǯ ǎƢƔƟƔƕƏƥƘƜƤ ƢƔƣȮ Ʀȶ ǂƟƫ ƦƘ ƝƔȴ ƝƏƦƫ ƔȎƦơȸƤ ƥƦƣƐƨƘƥƛƔƜ ǎƟ Ʀʁ μƏƩɾ. L T 1 lm. deest in T

2 ƔȎƦơȸƤ Heath 81: ƔȎƦȮƤ codd.

520c (ƝƞƒμƔƝƘƤ): ǒƥƦƜ [ƗȰ] ƘǴƗơƤ ƢƔƞƔƒƥμƔƦơƤ ǟ ƝƞʎμƔƠ. ƦơʝƦơ ƗȰ Ʀȶ ƥƩʀμƔ ǎƢȴ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ ƾƝơƧƥƦƐơƟ. L T 1 ƘǴƗơƤ ƢƔƞƔƒƥμƔƦơƤ: cf. Hesych. Ɲ 2994 ƝƞƜμƔƝƜƥμơƒŭ ƢƏƞƔƜƥμƔ ƢơƜƮƟ; Żesych. Ɨ 1053 ƗƜƔƝƞƜμƔƝƒƥƔƤŭ ƗƜƔƢƔƞƔƒƥƔƤ. žƞƒμƔƝƘƤ ƖȮƣ ƝƔȴ ƝƞƜμƔƝƜƥμơȴ ƢƔƞƔƒƥμƔƦơƤ ƘǴƗơƤ; Phot. Ɨ 338 ƗƜƔƝƞƜμƔƝȵƥƔƤ: ƗƜƔƢƔƞƔȵƥƔƤ. ƝƞʎμƔƠ ƖȮƣ ƝƔȴ ƝƞƜμƔƝƜƥμȷƤ, ƢȯƞƔƜƥμƔ ƢơƜȷƟ= Su. Ɨ 583; Paus. att. Ƙ 24; Eust. Il. IV 817, 11–7; Hesych. Ƙ 1444; Phot. Ƙ 403 1–2 haec a sch. pr. separavi ƘǴƗơƤ T

lm. addidi

ƗȰ delevi

ƝƞʎμƔƠ] ƝƞƒμƔƠ T

2 ƥƩʀμƔ]

143

sch. 519 – sch. 527

520–2 (ǤƟ ƗȰ μƘƦưƢƫƟ ... ƢƞƑƖμƔƦƔ): ƦơʝƦơ ǎƢȴ džƩƘƞʫơƧ· ơǯ ƖȮƣ ƦƔʝƣơƜ ƦơʎƤ ƝƐƣƔƥƜ ƝƔȴ μƘƦưƢơƜƤ μƏƩơƟƦƔƜ. L 1 lm. addidi

523 (ƿ ƗŪƘȎʬƢƜƤ): ǟ ŸƚƜƏƟƘƜƣƔ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris

526a ǎƖȺ ƗȰ μƏƦƚƣ μƐƟ : ǎƖư, ƨƚƥƒƟ, ǎƟƗƜƔƛƐƦƫƤ ȟƥƘȴ μƑƦƚƣ ƞƐƖƫ. L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. v. 526 ǎƖȺ ƗȰ – ƨƣƏƙƫ

ȟƥƘȴ] ȟƤ T

526b (ǎƖȺ ƗȰ ƦȮ ƦƐƣμƔƦŪ ơǴƔ ƨƣƏƙƫ): ǎƖȺ ƢƔƣƘʎƥƔ ƦȮ ƢơƞƞȮ ƦȮ ƦƐƞƚ ƞƐƖƫ ƦʬƟ ƢƣƔƖμƏƦƫƟ. L 1–2 haec a sch. pr. seiunxi 1 lm. hoc habuisse interpretem coni. Hartung: ǎƖȺ ƗȰ μȮƟ ƦƐƣμƔƦŪ ơǴƔ ƨƣƏƙƫ vel potius ǎƖȺ ƗȰ μȮƟ ƦƐƣμƔƛŪ ơǵƔ ƨƣƏƙƫ post Hartung Wecklein 20: ǎƖȺ ƗȰ μƏƦƚƟ μȰƟ ȃƥƥƔ ƨƣƏƙƫ Bernardakis 61

527 ƾμƨƜƟƘƒƝƚƦơƟ ȂμμƔ ƟƯμƨƔƤ : ƾƟƦȴ ǟ ƢƘƣƜμƏƩƚƦơƤ ƟƯμƨƚ ƢƘƣƜƨƣƔƥƦƜƝʬƤŭ ƾƢȶ ƗȰ Ʀơʝ ƝƔƞƞƜƥƦƘƯơƟƦơƤ ƔȎƦȲƟ ƘǴƢƘƟ μƐƣơƧƤ. L T 1 ƢƘƣƜμƏƩƚƦơƤ: cf. sch. 104.1 ubi ƦȮƟ ƾμƨƜƟƘƜƝʀ per ƦȲƟ ƢƘƣƜμƏƩƚƦơƟ explicatur; Hesych. Ɣ 4073 ƾμƨȵƟƘƜƝƘƤŭ ƢƘƣƜμȯƩƚƦơƟ ... ǎƟƔƟƦȵơƧƤ ǒƩƫƟ ƞȷƖơƧƤ. ƆơƨơƝƞʀƤ ƇƣƔƩƜƟȵƔƜƤ (527) 1 lm. fere LT ƾƟƦȴ] ƾƟ Ʀơʝ T

2 ƘǴƢƘƟ μƐƣơƧƤ] μƐƣ. ƘǴƢ. Ƈ

144

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

527–8 (Ʀȶ ƗŪ ƾμƨ. – ƾμμƐƟƘƜ): ǒƦƜ ƗȰ ƝƔȴ ƟƯμƨƚ ǎƞƘƘƜƟȲ ơȔƥƔ ȏƢƐμƘƜƟƘƟ ǟ ƢƘƣƜƝƔƞƞȲƤ ŸƚƜƏƟƘƜƣƔ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. addidi

scholio praefigit ǢƖơƧƟ T

ƗȰ ƝƔȴ om. T ǎƞƘƘƜƟȲ ơȔƥƔ] ơȔƥƔ ǎƞ. Ƈ

528 (ƾμμƐƟƘƜ): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƾƟƐμƘƟƘƟ. L 1 cf. sch. 647 ubi ƾμμƐƟơƧƥƔƜ per ƾƟƔμƐƟơƧƥƔƜ enarratur 1 lm. add. Lascaris

ƾƟƐμƘƜƟƘƟ Brunck2

529 (ƝƾƢȶ μƔƦƣȶƤ ǂƨƔƣ ƕƐƕƔƝƘƟ): ƢƔƣƔƩƣʀμƔ ƖƔμƚƛƘʎƥƔ ƦʬƟ ƦʀƤ μƚƦƣȶƤ ƾƨƫƣƒƥƛƚ ƢƣƔƖμƏƦƫƟ. L T 1 lm. addidi post ƢƔƣƔƩƣ. add. ƨƚƥȴ T

1–2 ƦʬƟ et ƢƣƔƖμƏƦƫƟ om. T

531 ǤμơƤ, ƨƒƞƔƜ, ƝƔƦŪ ơǴƝơƟ : ŸƚƜƏƟƘƜƣƔ ƢƣȶƤ ƦȶƟ ƩơƣȶƟ ǎƠƘƞƛơʝƥƔ ƗƜƔƞƐƖƘƦƔƜ ƝƔƒ ƨƚƥƜƟŭ ǎƟ ȃƥʪ ǿ ſƒƩƔƤ ƝƔƦȮ ƦȶƟ ơǴƝơƟ ƥƧƟƦƏƦƦƘƦƔƜ ƦƔʎƤ ƔǮƩμƔƞưƦơƜƤ, ǎƠʀƞƛơƟ, dzƟƔ ǃƢƘƣ ǎμƚƩƔƟƚƥƏμƚƟ Ɨƚƞưƥƫ ȏμʎƟ. L T 1 lm.] ǤμơƤ, ƨƒƞƔƜ T: deest in Ta; accuratiss. vv. 531–4 ǤμơƤ – ƿƦƘƩƟƚƥƏμƚƟ ŸƚƜƏƟƘƜƣƔ] ǟ Ÿ. T 2 ƥƧƟƦƏƦƦƘƦƔƜ] ƥƧƟƦƏƥƥƘƦƔƜ T ƦƔʎƤ] ante ƝƔƦȮ transp. T

532 (ȟƤ ǎƢŪ ǎƠƮƗʪ): ȟƤ μƐƞƞƫƟ ƔȔƛƜƤ ǎƠƜƐƟƔƜ ƢƣȶƤ ƦȶƟ ǧƣƔƝƞƐƔ. L 1 lm. add. Lascaris

535 (ƥƧƖƝƔƦơƜƝƦƜơƧμƐƟƚ): ƥȸƟ ȏμʎƟ ƛƣƚƟƑƥơƧƥƔ. Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris

ƛƣƚƟơʝƥƔ Heath 81

sch. 527–8 – sch. 540-2

145

536–7 ƾƞƞŪ ǎƙƘƧƖμƐƟƚƟ | ƢƔƣƘƜƥƗƐƗƘƖμƔƜ : ƖƘƖƔμƚμƐƟƚƟ Ʀʭ ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ ƢƣơƥƘƗƘƠƏμƚƟ ƨơƣƦƒơƟ ƞƫƕƚƦȶƟ ƦʀƤ ǎμʀƤ ƨƣƘƟƮƤ, ƕƞƔƕƘƣȶƟ ƨơƣƦƒơƟ ƝƔȴ ǎƨƯƕƣƜƥƦơƟ. L T 1 ƖƘƖƔμƚμƐƟƚƟ: cf. Hesych. ƙ 188 ƙƧƖƘƒƤŭ ƖƔμƑƥƔƤ 3 ǎƨƯƕƣƜƥƦơƟ: cf. sch. Ai. 1388 ǎƨƯƕƣƜƥƦơƟ; ibid. 216… ǎƨȹƕƣƜƥƦƔ ƘDzƣƖƔƥƦƔƜ μƔƟȵɯ ƢƘƣƜƢƘƥȻƟ· ƦơʝƦơ ƖȮƣ Ʀȶ ƾƢƘƞƫƕȳƛƚ. Ǡ ơȓƦƫƤŭ ǎƟƧƕƣƒƥƛƚ ƝƔȴ ƞƫƕƚƦȶƤ ƖƐƖơƟƘƟ; Su. Ɣ 3016 džƢƘƞƫƕȳƛƚ: ǎƨȹƕƣƜƥƦƔ ƘDzƣƖƔƥƦƔƜ; Eust. Il. IV 949, 8 ſƫƕƚƦƮƤ ƗȰ ƝƔȴ ƟʝƟ ǿ ǎƨƯƕƣƜƥƦơƤ; Hesych. ƞ 1490 ƞƫƕƚƦȷƟ· ǎƟƧƕƣƜƥƦȷƟ (ƌ 531) 1 lm.] ǎƙƘƧƖμƐƟƚƟ T; accuratiss. vv. 536–8 ƾƞƞŪ– ƨƣƘƟƮƤ ante ƖƘƖƔμƚμƐƟƚƟ add. ƦơƧƦƐƥƦƜ T 2 ante ƕƞƔƕƘƣȶƟ add. ǢƖơƧƟ T 3 post ǎƨƯƕƣƜƥƦơƟ add. ƦʀƤ ǎμʀƤ ƨƣƘƟƮƤ T

538 (ǎμƢƮƞƚμƔ): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƙƚμƒƔƟ. Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

539–40 (μƜɱƤ ȏƢȶ | ƩƞƔƒƟƚƤ): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ μƜɱƤ ƝơƒƦƚƤ. L 1 lm. add. Lascaris μƜɱƤ ƝơƒƦƚƤ Kruytbosch 46 et Zielinski 54

540–2 (ƦơƜƏƗŪ … ) ơǮƝơƯƣƜŪ ƾƟƦƐƢƘμƪƘ (– ƩƣƮƟơƧ): ƦơƜƔʝƦƔ ƦʀƤ ơǮƝơƧƣƒƔƤ ƗʬƣƔ ǒƢƘμƪƐ μơƜ ȏƢȰƣ Ʀơʝ ƩƣƮƟơƧ ƢƔƟƦȶƤ ơȕ ƥƧƟʫƝƚƥƔ ƔȎƦʭ, ȃ ǎƥƦƜƟ ƘȎƩƔƣƜƥƦƑƣƜƔ ƦʀƤ ƢơƞƧƩƣơƟƒơƧ ǟμʬƟ ơǮƝơƧƣƒƔƤ. L T 1–2 ƦʀƤ ơǮƝơƧƣƒƔƤ ƗʬƣƔ: cf. Eust. Il. II 192, 3–4 … ƦȮ ơǮƝơȹƣƜƔ ƢƔƣȮ ƆơƨơƝƞƘʎ, ǃƢƘƣ ƘǮƥȴƟ ơǮƝơƧƣȵƔƤ μƜƥƛơȵ… 1 lm. L supplevi (L ƾƟƦƐƢƘμƪƘƟ (-ƘƟ per compendium) habet): deest in T post ƦơƜƔʝƦƔ add. ƨƚƥȴ T 2 post μơƜ add. ǿ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ T 3 ƢơƞƧƩƣơƟƒơƧ Dindorf 71 coll. sch. Soph. Ai. 194d (contuli etiam sch. Ant. 986, 987): ƢơƞƧƩƣơƟƒƔƤ codd.

146

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

547 (ǣƕƚƟ) Ʀʁ μȰƟ ǓƣƢơƧƥƔƟ ƢƣƮƥƫ : Ʀʁ ǶƮƞɾ ƢƣơƝƮƢƦơƧƥƔƟ ƝƔȴ ƔȎƠơμƐƟƚƟ ƦȲƟ ǣƕƚƟ. L 1 lm. L supplevi et Kruytbosch 46 secutus sum Ʀʁ μȰƟ pro ƦȲƟ μȰƟ scribens (hanc fuisse scholiastae scripturam coni. primus Blaydes 119): ƦȲƟ μȰƟ ǓƣƢơƧƥƔƟ ƢƣƮƥƫ L

548 (Ʀʁ ƗȰ ƨƛƒƟơƧƥƔƟ): ǏƔƧƦȲƟ ƞƐƖƘƜ ƗƘƜƝƦƜƝʬƤŭ ƨƛƒƟơƧƥƔƟ ƗȰ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƕƘƕƚƝƧʎƔƟ. L 1 lm. addidi verbis ƦȲƟ ƗȰ in Ʀʁ ƗȰ mutatis; nam scholiasta haec pro illis legisse videtur; cf. ad sch. praecedens; (ƦȲƟ ƗȰ s.) L

548–9a ȥƟ ƾƨƔƣƢƏƙƘƜƟ ƨƜƞƘʎ | ǾƨƛƔƞμȶƤ ǂƟƛơƤ : ȥƟ, Ɨȹơ ǟƞƜƝƜʬƟ, ƦȲƟ ƟƘȯƙơƧƥƔƟ ƿƣƢȯƙƘƜƟ ƘDzƫƛƘƟ ǿ Ʀơʝ ƾƟƗƣȶƤ ǾƨƛƔƞμƮƤ. L T 1 lm. scripsi: ƦʬƟƗŪ ȏƢƘƝƦƣȱƢƘƜ ƢȷƗƔ L: deest in T, quippe qui hoc sch. scholio 548–9b continuet (ơǵơƟ ƦʬƟ Ɨȹơ ǟƞƜƝƜʬƟ) 1–2 ȥƟ, ƗƯơ ǟƞƜƝƜʬƟ locum refinxi (cf. sch. 841–5.1–2, sch. El. 176a.1): ȥƟ Ɨȹơ L: ƦʬƟ ƗƯơ T 2 ƦȲƟ] Ʀ. μȰƟ T Ʀơʝ ƾƟƗƣȶƤ] ƦʬƟ ƾƟƛƣȻƢƫƟ T post ǾƨƛƔƞμȶƤ add. ƦʀƤ ƗȰ ȏƢƘƝƦƣȱƢƘƜƟ ƦȶƟ ƢȷƗƔ ǢƦơƜ ƦʀƤ ƢƣƘƥƕƧƦȱƣƔƤ T

548–9b ȥƟ ƾƨƔƣƢƏƙƘƜƟ – ƢƮƗƔ : Ʀȶ ǂƟƛơƤ ƦʬƟ ƟȱƫƟ ƖƧƟƔƜƝʬƟ ƨƜƞƘʎ ƿƣƢȯƙƘƜƟ ǿ ǾƨƛƔƞμȶƤ Ʀơʝ ƾƟƗƣȷƤ, ƦʬƟ ƗȰ ȏƢƔƟƔƩƫƣƘʎƟ, ƗƚƞơƟȷƦƜ ƦʬƟ ƢƣƘƥƕƧƦȱƣƫƟ. L T 1 lm. scripsi: ǾƨƛƔƞμơʝ (ǾƨƛƔƞμȶƤ scripsit Papageorgiou) ǂƟƛơƤ L: deest in T ǂƟƛơƤ add. ƨƚƥȴ T 2 Ʀơʝ ƾƟƗƣȷƤ] ƦʬƟ ƾƟƗƣʬƟ T

post

550–1 ƢƮƥƜƤ … ƾƟƑƣ : ƗƜƔƨơƣȮƟ ƦƔƯƦƚƟ ǒƩƘƜ ǿ ƢƮƥƜƤ ƢƣȶƤ ƦȶƟ ǂƟƗƣƔŭ ƢƮƥƜƤ ƖȮƣ ƞƐƖƘƦƔƜ ƝƔȴ ǿ Ƣƣȶ Ƣơƞƞơʝ ƾƢơƥƦȮƤ ƦʀƤ ƖƧƟƔƜƝƮƤ, ƾƟȲƣ ƗŪ ǿ ƥƧƟȺƟ ƝƔȴ ǿ Ƣƣȶ ǾƞƒƖơƧ ƩƫƣƜƥƛƘȴƤ ȟƤ Ʀȶ

DŽƟƘƣ, ƾƢŪ ƔǮʬƟơƤ ƟƐơƤ ȢƞƘơ.

sch. 547 – sch. 554

147

5 ƗƐƗơƜƝƔ ơȔƟ, ƨƚƥƒ, μȲ ǎμȰ ƝƔƦƔƞƜƢȺƟ ƢƮƥƜƤ ǎμȶƤ Ɲƞƚƛʁ ȟƤ ƥƧƟơƜƝƑƥƔƤ μơƒ ƢơƦƘ, ƦƔƯƦƚƤ ƗȰ ƾƟȲƣ ȟƤ ǒƦƜ ƔȎƦʁ ƥƧƟơƜƝʬƟ. L 1 ƗƜƔƨơƣȮƟ – ǂƟƗƣƔ: cf. Eust. Od. I 9, 38–40 ȋƦƜ ƗơƝƘʎ μȰƟ ƾƗƜȯƨơƣƔ ƘǴƟƔƜ ǿ ƢȷƥƜƤ ƦƘ ƝƔȴ ǿ ƾƟƑƣ, ƆơƨơƝƞʀƤ ƗȰ ǎƟ ƇƣƔƩƜƟȵƔƜƤ ȏƢƘμƨƔȵƟƘƜ ƗƜƔƨơƣȯƟ ƦƜƟƔ ƦʬƟ ƞȱƠƘƫƟ ƦơȹƦƫƟ ǒƟƛƔ ƗȱƗơƜƝƘƟ ǟ ȏƢȱƣƔƝμơƤ ŸƚƬȯƟƘƜƣƔ, μȳ ƢơƦƘ ǿ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ ƔȎƦʀƤ μȰƟ ƘDzƚ ƢȷƥƜƤ, ƦʀƤ ƗȰ ƟƘƫƦȱƣƔƤ ǶȻƞƚƤ ƾƟȳƣ; Id. Il. IV 983, 23 – 984, 2 ƘǮ ƗȰ ƦʀƤ džƟƗƣơμȯƩƚƤ ƘǮƢơȹƥƚƤ ǂƟƗƣƔ ƦȶƟ ǛƝƦơƣƔ ǎƟ Ʀʭ «DŽƟƘƣ, ƾƢŪ ƔǮʬƟơƤ ȢƞƘơ» ǗƞȱƟƚ ơȎƝ ǂƟƗƣƔ ƦȶƟ ƄȯƣƜƟ ǒƨƚ ƾƞƞȮ ƢȷƥƜƟ, ƙƚƦƚƦȱơƟ, ƘDz ƦȵƤ ǎƥƦƜ ƗƜƔƨơƣȮ ƢȷƥƜơƤ ƝƔȴ ƾƟƗƣȷƤ, ƝƔƛȮ ƆơƨơƝƞʀƤ ǎƟ ƇƣƔƩƜƟȵƔƜƤ ǎμƨƔȵƟƘƜ, ȃƢơƧ ǟ ŸƚƬȯƟƘƜƣƔ ƗȱƗơƜƝƘ, μȳ ƢơƦƘ ǿ ƔȎƦȲƟ ǒƩƫƟ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ Ʀʁ μȰƟ ƔǮƩμƔƞȻƦʪ Ƕȷƞɾ ƘDzƚ ƾƟȳƣ, ƔȎƦʁ ƗȰ ƢȷƥƜƤ 4 Hom. Il. 24.725 1 lm. sic L; pars 5 – fin. ad vv. 550–1 ƦƔʝƦƔ – ƝƔƞʀƦƔƜ spectat ǿ ƢƮƥƜƤ Lascaris: ǟ ƢƮƥƜƤ L (quod recepit ƞƐƠƜƤ subaudiens Papageorgiou): Ʀȶ ƢƮƥƜƤ Lp 2 ƾƢơƥƦȮƤ ƦʀƤ Lascaris: ƾƢơƥƦƏƦƚƤ L, quam lectionem retineri posse censet Wansink 103 (ƾƢơƥƦȮ ƦʀƤ dedit Papageorgiou) 5 post ƢƮƥƜƤ add. μȰƟ Papageorgiou

550 ƢƮƥƜƤ: ƢƣƮƥƜƤ ƦƜƤ ȠƟ ƢƔƣȮ Ʀȶ ƢƣơƥƜƐƟƔƜ. L 1 ƢƣơƥƜƐƟƔƜ Lascaris: ƢƣơƬƐƟƔƜ L

552 ƾƞƞŪ ơȎ ƖƏƣ, ȣƥƢƘƣ ƘǴƢơƟ : ơȎ ƩƣȲ ƦȲƟ ƥƧƟƘƦȲƟ ƖƧƟƔʎƝƔ ƛƧμơʝƥƛƔƜ Ʀʭ ƾƟƗƣƒŭ ɣ ƗȰ ƦƣƮƢʪ ƦʀƤ ƞƯƢƚƤ DzƔμƔ ƥƩơƒƚƟ ȏμʎƟ ǎƣʬ. L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 552–4 ƾƞƞŪ – ƨƣƏƥƫ post ƩƣȲ add. ƨƚƥȴ T 2 DzƔμƔ] pertinet ad ƞƧƦƑƣƜơƟ quod scholiasta pro substantivơ accipere videtur (cf. sch. 554) DzƔμƔ] DzƔμŪ ǀƟ Blaydes 122; de modo cf. sch. 1057a.2 ƘDzƚ post ǎƣʬ add. ǤƟ μơƜ ƢƔƞƔƜȶƟ ƗʬƣơƟ (v. 555) ƝƔȴ ƦȮ ǏƠʀƤ T

554 (ƞƯƢƚμƔ): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƦʀƤ ƞƯƢƚƤ. L 1 lm. add. Papageorgiou

vide ad sch. 552.2 DzƔμƔ

148

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

556a ƞƐƕƚƦƜ ƩƔƞƝƐʪ : Ɨȹơ ǾƟȷμƔƦƔ ȟƤ ƝƣƔƦƘƣȶƟ ƔǮƩμƚƦȳƟ. L 1 ƝƣƔƦƘƣȶƟ ƔǮƩμƚƦƑƟ: Hom. Il.3.179 ƾμƨȷƦƘƣơƟ ƕƔƥƜƞƘȹƤ ƦŪ ƾƖƔƛȶƤ ƝƣƔƦƘƣȷƤ ƦŪ ƔǮƩμƚƦȳƤ 1 de scholio vide Xenis

556b (ƝƘƝƣƧμμƐƟơƟ): ȟƤ ǒƝƦơƦƘ ƾƢơƛƘμȱƟƚƤ ƞȱƕƚƦƜ ǎƢȴ Ʀʭ ƝƔƦȮ ƝƔƜƣȶƟ ƩƣȳƥƔƥƛƔƜ ƔȎƦʭ. L; cf. gl. in Ts.l. 1–2 haec a sch. pr. separavi et lemmate instruxi; vide Xenis 1 ȟƤ – fin.] ǎƢȴ Ʀʭ ƝƔƦȮ ƝƔƜƣȶƟ ƩƣȳƥƔƥƛƔƜ ƔȎƦʭ gl. ad ƝƘƝƣƧμμȱƟơƟ nec plura T Ʀʭ T: Ʀȶ L 2 ƔȎƦʭ ƇLp (Lascaris): ƔȎƦȶ L

557 ƢƔʎƤ : ƟƘƫƦƐƣƔŭ ơȎ ƖȮƣ ƢƔƣƛƐƟơƤ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. deest in T

558a Źž ƉƃƁƌƁ : ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƔdzμƔƦơƤŭ ȋμƚƣơƤ

ǂƝƣơƟ ǎƣƘƧƖƮμƘƟơƜ ƨƮƟơƟ ƔdzμƔƦơƤŭ Ǡ ǎƝ Ʀơʝ ƦƮƢơƧ ȃƛƘƟ ǎƨơƟƘƯƛƚ ǿ ƁƐƥƥơƤŭ ȋμƚƣơƤ ǎƟ ƾƣƖƔƞƐɾƥƜ ƨơƟʁƥƜƟ. L T 1 ƔdzμƔƦơƤ: cf. sch. Aesch. Ch. 1012 ] Ʀơʝ ƔdzμƔƦơƤ; id. Th. 44f; ibid. 939a; Hesych. ƨ 737 ƨȷƟơƤŭ ... Ǡ ƔǵμƔ; Ɔ ƨ 166 ƉƮƟơƤ ǒƣƣƘƧƥƘƟŭ ƔǵμƔ ǒƣƣƘƧƥƘƟ = Phot. 653, 17 = Su. ƨ 573; Eust. Il. II 17, 1 ƉƮƟơƤ ƗȰ Ʀȶ ƔǵμƔ; ibid. I 721, 2–3; ibid. IV 763, 5–6; ibid. II 286, 27–8 ȋμƚƣơƤ: Il. 16.162 3 ǎƝ Ʀơʝ ƦƮƢơƧ: cf. sch. Hom. Il. 15.633 ...ƨơƟʁƥƜ ƗȰ Ʀʭ ƨƮƟʪ, Ǡ Ʀʭ ƦƮƢʪ, ǒƟƛƔ ƢƘƨƮƟƘƧƦƔƜ; sch. D Hom. Il. 10.521 ƨơƟʀƜƥƜ: ƦơʎƤ ƦƮƢơƜƤ ǎƟ ơǵƤ ǒƝƘƜƟƦơ ơǯ ƟƘƝƣơƒ; sch. Pi. P. 11.55 … ƨơƟƔȴ ƗȰ ơǯ ƦȷƢơƜ ƘǮƤ ơȑƤ ƨơƟƘȹơƟƦƔƜ ƝƔƞơʝƟƦƔƜ. ȋμƚƣơƤ (ž 521)· ǎƟ ƾƣƖƔƞȱɾƥƜ ƨơƟʁƥƜƟ; sch. Lyc. 1113c … ƨơƟƔʎƤ ƗƐŭ ƾƟƦȴ ƦơʎƤ Ʀơʝ ƨȷƟơƧ ƦȷƢơƜƤ, ǒƟƛƔ ǎƨơƟƘȹƛƚ, ȟƤ ƝƔȴ ȋμƚƣơƤ (ž 521) «ǂƟƗƣƔƤ ƦŪ ƾƥƢƔȵƣơƟƦƔƤ ǎƟ ƾƣƖƔƞȱɾƥƜ ƨơƟʁƥƜ», ǎƟ ƦơʎƤ ƨơƟƜƝơʎƤ ƦȷƢơƜƤ; Hesych. ƨ 733 ƨơƟƔȵŭ ơȓƦƫ ƝƔƞơʝƟƦƔƜ ơǯ ƦȷƢơƜ ǒƟƛƔ ƦƜƟȰƤ ƾƟƔƜƣơʝƟƦƔƜ (ž 521); Eust. Il. II 286, 27–8; ibid. III 123, 27–8 ȋμƚƣơƤ: Il. 10.521

sch. 556a – sch. 565

149

1 lm. scripsi: ǎƝ ƨƮƟƫƟ Ƈ: ǎƝ ƨƮƟƫƟ ƾƟƘƜƞƮμƚƟ L; in parte 1–2 ƨƮƟƫƟ explicat scholiasta; in sequentibus ƨơƟʬƟ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ L: ƦơƧƦƐƥƦƜ Ƈ 2 ǂƝƣơƟ cum ƨƮƟơƟ coniunxit scholiasta (cf. sch. Hom. Il. 16.162b ƦƜƟȰƤ ƗȰ Ʀʭ ƨȷƟơƟ ǎƢƜƥƧƟȯƢƦơƧƥƜƟ, ǂƝƣơƟ ƨȷƟơƟ,…) ǎƣƘƧƖƮμƘƟơƜ] ǎƣƘƧƖƮμƘƟơƤ Ƈ 3 ȃƛƘƟ] ǒƟƛƔ Ƈ ƁƐƥƥơƤ Brunck2: ƁƐƥơƤ, simplici ƥ, LƇ ut semper in scholiis et in poetae verbis (hoc amplius non notatur) 4 ƨơƟʁƥƜƟ L (ƨơƟʀƥƜƟ dedit Papageorgiou) T

558b (ƨƮƟƫƟ): ƦʬƟ ƥƨƔƖʬƟ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 cf. Hesych. ƨ 737 ƨƮƟơƤŭ ǿ ƗƜȮ ƥƨƔƖʀƤ ƛƏƟƔƦơƤ… 1 lm. add. Elmsley

560 (ƢƮƣƘƧƘ): ƗƜƘƢƐƣƔ, ƗƜƘƢƮƣƛμƘƧƘƟ. L Ts.l. 1 ƗƜƘƢƮƣƛμƘƧƘƟ: cf. sch. Eur. Alc. 439 ... (ad lm. ƖƧƟƔʎƝŪ ƾƣƒƥƦƔƟ ƞƒμƟƔƟ džƩƘƣơƟƦƒƔƟ ƢơƣƘƯƥƔƤ) ƾƣȵƥƦƚƟ ƖƧƟƔʎƝƔ ƢơƣƛμƘȹƥƔƤ ƘǮƤ ƦȲƟ džƩƘƣơƧƥȵƔƟ ƞȵμƟƚƟ 1 lm. add. Brunck2; (ƢƮƣƘƧƘ s.) L ƗƜƘƢƐƣƔ, ƗƜƘƢƮƣƛμƘƧƘƟ inverso ordine Ƈ

562–3 (ƦʬƟ ƢƔƦƣʫƫƟ) ǟƟƒƝƔ ƥƦƮƞƫƟ | (– ǏƥƢƮμƚƟ): ƥƦƮƞơƟ ƨƚƥȴ Ʀȶ ƢƞʀƛơƤ ƦʬƟ ǎƟ Ʀʁ ơǮƝƒɯ ƗơƯƞƫƟ ƦƘ ƝƔȴ ƾƗƘƞƨʬƟŭ ǟƟƒƝƔ ơȔƟ ƝƔƦƔƞƜƢơʝƥƔ ƦȶƟ ơǴƝơƟ Ʀơʝ ƢƔƦƣȶƤ ǒƣƚμơƤ ǎƢƚƝơƞơƯƛƚƥƔ Ʀʭ ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ. L Ƈ 1 lm. L supplevi: deest in Ƈ; interpretem ƦʬƟ ƢƔƦƣʫƫƟ ... ƥƦƮƞƫƟ pro ƦȶƟ ƢƔƦƣʭơƟ ... ƥƦƮƞơƟ habuisse coni. Wolff 217 ƨƚƥȴ post ƢƞʀƛơƤ transp. Ƈ 2 post ơǮƝƒɯ add. ƔȎƦʀƤ Ƈ ǟƟƒƝƔ ơȔƟ] ơǵơƟ ǟƟ. T 3 ǒƣƚμơƤ] scholiasta ƘȔƟƜƤ orbatam significare censuit, ut vidit Wolff l.c. post ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ add. ƝƔȴ ƦȮ ǏƠʀƤ T

565 μƔƦƔƒƔƜƤ ƩƘƣƥƒƟ : ȃƦƜ ơȎƗȰƟ ǢƟƧƥƘƟŭ ǒƨƛƔƥƘ ƖȮƣ ǿ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ ƦơƠƘƯƥƔƤ ƝƔȴ ƾƟƘƞȺƟ ƔȎƦƮƟ. L Ƈ

150

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

566 ǎƢƜƥƦƣƐƪƔƤ [ƩƘƣơʎƟ]: ƘȎƦƣƘƢƒƥƔƤŭ Ǡ ƥƦƣƐƪƔƤ ƝƔȴ ƝƏμƪƔƤ ƦȲƟ ƟƘƧƣƏƟŭ Ǡ ƘǮƤ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƥƦƣƔƨƘȴƤ ƝƔȴ ƕƞƐƪƔƤ. L T 1 lm. L decurtavit Brunck2: ǎƢƜƥƦƣƐƪƔƤ ƗȰ T, quippe qui hoc sch. annotationi priori continuet ƘȎƦƣƘƢƒƥƔƤ Ǡ om. T ante ƥƦƣƐƪƔƤ add. ƾƟƦƒ Ʀơʝ T

567 ƝơμȳƦƚƟ : Ǡ ƗƜȮ ƦơȸƤ ȂƖƝơƧƤ Ǡ ƗƜȮ ƦȲƟ ƢƦȱƣƫƥƜƟŭ Ʀȶ ƗȰ ƢƟƘȹμơƟƔƤ ƾƟƦȴ ǏƟƜƝơʝ. L 1 ȂƖƝơƧƤ: cf. sch. 680a 1 lm. scripsi: ǥƝƘƟ ƝơμȳƦƚƟ ǮȷƟ L

568 (ƗƜƘƣƣơƒƙƚƥƘƟ): μƘƦȮ ǢƩơƧ ȣƣμƚƥƘƟ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 ȣƣμƚƥƘƟ: cf. Ɔ Ɨ 207 ƗƜƔʛʜơȵƙƘƦƔƜŭ ǿƣμɲ = Phot. Ɨ 421 = Su. Ɨ 739 1 lm. add. Brunck2

570a ƦơƥƮƟƗŪ ǾƟƑƥɾ : ȞƨƘƞƚƛƑƥɾ ƝƔȴ ȂƟƚƥƜƟ ƞƑƪɾ ǎƝ ƦʬƟ ǎμʬƟ ƢơƣƛμʬƟ. L; cf. gl. in Ts.l. 1 cf. e.g. sch. D Hom. Il. 6.260 ƝƔȴ ƔȎƦȶƤ ǾƟƑƥƘƔƜ: ƝƔȴ ƔȎƦȶƤ ȞƨƘƞƚƛƑƥɾ; Hesych. ơ 879 ǾƟȳƥƘƔƜ· ȂƟƚƥƜƟ ƞȳƪɾ (ź 260) 1 lm. accuratiss. 570–1 ǾƟƑƥɾ – ƢơƣƛμʬƟ ǾƟƑƥɾ nec plura T

ȞƨƘƞƚƛƑƥɾ – fin.] ȞƨƘƞƚƛƑƥɾ gl. ad

570b (ǎȮƟ ƢƧƛʁ ): ƖƣȯƨƘƦƔƜ ǎȮƟ ƢƜƛʁ. L 1 lm. add. Lascaris

Ɩƣ. L

ƢƜƛʁ] solum de litteris ƢƜ constat in L

sch. 566 – sch. 580–1

151

572 (ƾμƨƒƛƣƘƢƦơƟ): Ʀȶ ƢƘƢƚƖƮƤŭ ƛƣƐƪƔƜ ƖȮƣ Ʀȶ ƢʀƠƔƜ. L Ts.l. 1 cf. sch. Hom. Od. 9.246 ƛƣƐƪƔƤ] ƢƑƠƔƤ; Apollon. S. 88, 14 ƛƣȱƪƔƤŭ ƢȳƠƔƤ...; Hesych. ƛ 727 ƛƣȱƪƔƜ· ƢʀƠƔƜ (Ɯ 246)...; Ɔ ƛ 105 ƛƣȱƪƔƤŭ ƢȳƠƔƤ... = Phot. ƛ 217 ƛƣƐƪƔƤ (Ɯ 246)ŭ ƢƑƠƔƤ = Su. ƛ 477; Eust. Od. I 340, 11 1 lm. add. Lascaris; (ƾμƨƒƛƣƘƢƦơƟ s.) L post Ʀȶ (pr.) add. ƾƢȶ ƦʀƤ ȓƗƣƔƤ T

573 (ɓ ): ȃƢơƧ Ǡ ǎƟ ɣ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Brunck2

574 (ƛƣƐμμƔ … ȓƗƣƔƤ): ƢƘƣƜƨƣƔƥƦƜƝʬƤ ǟ ȓƗƣƔ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. addidi

575 ǒƥƦƔƜ ƨƣƘƟƮƤ ƥơƜ ƦơʝƦơ ƝƚƞƚƦƑƣƜơƟ : ǎƢƜƦƑƗƘƜơƟ ƢƣȶƤ Ʀȶ ƢƔʝƥƔƜ ƝƔȴ ƝƚƞʀƥƔƜŭ ƝƔƦƔƢƔƧƥƦƑƣƜơƟ ƦʀƤ ƨƣƘƟȶƤ Ʀơʝ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ Ʀơʝ ƢƣȶƤ ǂƞƞƚƟ ǒƣƫƦơƤ Ǡ ƝƔƦƔƝƚƞơʝƟ ƦȲƟ ƪƧƩȲƟ Ʀơʝ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ Ʀʭ ƢƣȶƤ ƦȲƟ ŸƚƜƏƟƘƜƣƔƟ ǒƣƫƦƜ. L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. 575–6 ǒƥƦƔƜ – ǧƣƔƝƞƘƒƔƤ 2 post ƝƚƞʀƥƔƜ add. ƔȎƦƮƟ T ƝƔƦƔƢƔƧƥƦƑƣƜơƟ] ơǵơƟ Ɲ. T 3 ƝƔƦƔƝƚƞơʝƟ T: ƝƔƦƔƝƚƞơʝƟƦơƤ L

579 (ǎƖƝƘƝƞƘƜƥμƐƟơƟ): ƦƚƣơƯμƘƟơƟ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris; ǎƖƝƘƝƞƘƜμƐƟơƟ apud poetam praebet L, ǎƖƝƘƝƞƘƜƥμƐƟơƟ T

580–1 (ƢƣơƥƕƔƞơʝƥŪ – ƘǴƢƘ): ƦơʝƦƮ ƨƚƥƜƟ ȟƤ ƝƔƦŪ ǎƟƦơƞȲƟ ƁƐƥƥơƧ ƝƔȴ ǂƞƞƔ ƦƜƟȮ ƥƧμμƒƠƔƥƔ. L T 1 lm. addidi

2 ƦƜƟȮ ƥƧμμƒƠƔƥƔ inverso ordine T

152

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

581 ƝƔȴ ƢƘƢƘƒƣƔƟƦƔƜ ƦƏƗƘ : ƝƔƦƘƒƣƖƔƥƦƔƜ, ƦƘƦƘƞƘƒƫƦƔƜ ƝƔȴ ǢƟƧƥƦƔƜ. L T; cf. etiam gl. in Ts.l. 1 ƦƘƦƘƞƘƒƫƦƔƜ: cf. e.g. Ɔ Ƣ 312 ƢƘƣƔȵƟơƟƦƔƤŭ ƦƘƞƘƜơʝƟƦƔƤ = Phot. 413, 3 = Su. Ƣ 1046; Eust. Od. II 2, 24–5 ǚƥƦƜ ƗȰ Ʀȶ ƢƘƢƘȵƣƔƟƦƔƜ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƦƘƦƘƞƘȵƫƟƦƔƜ (scribe ƦƘƦƘƞƘƒƫƦƔƜ), ƾƢȶ Ʀơʝ ƢƘƜƣƔȵƟƫ, ȟƤ ǎƝ Ʀơʝ ƨƔȵƟƫ Ʀȶ ƢȱƨƔƟƦƔƜ. ǢƟƧƥƦƔƜ: cf. Hesych. Ƣ 1534 ƢƘƣƔȵƟƘƜŭ ... ƾƟȹƘƜ 1 lm.] ƢƘƢƘƒƣƔƦƔƜ T; cum sch. 580–1 c. in T (ƢƘƢƘƒƣƔƦƔƜ ƗȰ) ƝƔƦ., ƦƘƦƘƞ. ƝƔȴ ǢƟ.] ǢƟ., ƝƔƦ. T ƦƘƦƘƞƘƒƫƦƔƜ invenitur tantum ut gl. ad ƢƘƢƘƒƣƔƦƔƜ (sic) in T

582a ƝƔƝȮƤ ƗȰ ƦȷƞμƔƤ : μȲ ƘǮƗƘƒƚƟ, ƨƚƥƒ, ƝƔƝơʎƤ ƢƣƏƖμƔƥƜƟ ǎƢƜƩƘƜƣƘʎƟ, ơǵơƟ ƗơƞơƨơƟʀƥƔƜ ƔȎƦȶƟ Ǣ ƦƜ ƦơƜơʝƦơƟ, ƾƞƞŪ ǂƩƣƜ Ʀơʝ μƘƦƔƛƘʎƟƔƜ ƔȎƦơʝ ƦȲƟ ƖƟưμƚƟ ƗƜȮ Ʀơʝ ƝƔƦƔƥƝƘƧƏƥμƔƦơƤ ƦơƯƦơƧ. L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. v. 582–6 ƝƔƝȮƤ ƗȰ – ƦơȒƣƖơƟ ǎƣƖƏƥƔƥƛƔƜ T

2 post ƦơƜơʝƦơƟ add.

582b (ƦƮƞμƔƤ): ƦȮƤ ƨƔƣμƔƝƘƒƔƤ. Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

584–7 (ƨƒƞƦƣơƜƤ – ƢƘƢƔƯƥơμƔƜ): ƘǮ μȲ μƏƦƔƜƮƟ ǎƥƦƜ ƦơʝƦơ Ʀȶ ƝƔƦƔƥƝƘƯƔƥμƔ, ƢƣơƥƗơƝʬ ƦƔƯƦƚƟ ȏƢƘƣƕƔƞƐƥƛƔƜ Ʀʁ ƢƣȶƤ Ʀơʝ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ ƘȎƟơƒɯŭ ƘǮ ƗȰ μȲ ǎƢƜƦƧƖƩƏƟƫ, ƢƔƯƥơμƔƜ ƦʀƤ ǎƢƜƩƘƜƣƑƥƘƫƤ. L T 1–3 haec a sch. 582a separavit Papageorgiou 1 lm. addidi ƦơʝƦơ post ƝƔƦƔƥƝƘƯƔƥμƔ transp. T 2 ƢƣȶƤ] ƢƔƣȮ T (Lascaris): ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƤ L

post ǎƥƦȴ add. ƨƚƥȴ T 3 ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ T Lp

sch. 581 – sch. 592a1

153

584–6 (ƨƒƞƦƣơƜƤ –) μƘμƚƩƏƟƚƦƔƜ ƦơȔƣƖơƟ : ƦơʝƦơ, ƨƚƥƒ, Ʀȶ ǒƣƖơƟ μƘμƚƩƏƟƚƦƔƜ ơȎƝ ǎƢŪ ǾƞƐƛƣʪ, ƾƞƞŪ dzƟƔ ƦƔƯƦƚƟ ƨƒƞƦƣơƜƤ ȏƢƘƣƕƔƞưμƘƛƔ. L T 1 lm. L supplevi: deest in T ƦơʝƦơ – 2 μƘμƚƩƏƟƚƦƔƜ om. T

587 ƘǮ ƗȰ μƑ, ƢƘƢƔƯƥơμƔƜ: ƘǮ ƗȰ μȲ ǎƟƘƣƖƑƥɾ, ƢƔƯƥơμƔƜ ƦʀƤ ǎƢƜƩƘƜƣƑƥƘƫƤ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. deest in T ǎƟƘƣƖƑƥɾ L, de modo cf. sch. 458.2 et vide ad sch. El. 86a..9: ǎƟƘƣƖƑƥƘƜ T 2 ǎƢƜƩƘƜƣƑƥƘƫƤ] ǎƖƩƘƜƣƑƥƘƫƤ T

588 ƾƞƞŪ ƘDz ƦƜƤ ǎƥƦȴ ƢƒƥƦƜƤ ǎƟ ƦơʎƤ ƗƣƫμƐƟơƜƤ : ƾƞƞŪ ƘǮ ƢƘƢƒƥƦƘƧƝƔƤ ȃƦƜ Ɨƣɲ ƦƜ ƦơʝƦơ, ǂƣƜƥƦƏ μơƜ ƗơƝƘʎƤ ƕƘƕơƧƞƘʝƥƛƔƜ. L T 1 lm. deest in Ƈ; accuratiss. vv. 588–9 ƾƞƞŪ ƘDz ƦƜƤ – ƝƔƝʬƤ

2 Ɨƣɲ] ƗƣƏƥƘƜ Ƈ

590–1 (Ʀȶ μȰƟ – ƢƣơƥƫμƒƞƚƥƏ Ƣƫ): ƢƜƥƦƘƯƫ μȰƟ ƾƞƚƛȰƤ ƘǴƟƔƜ, ơȎ μȲƟ ƢƘƢƘƒƣƔμƔƜ. L 1 lm. addidi

592a1 ƾƞƞŪ ƘǮƗƐƟƔƜ ƩƣȲ ƗƣʬƥƔƟ : ƗƘʎ ƥƘ ƗƣʬƥƔƟ ǒƩƘƜƟ ƦȲƟ ƖƟʬƥƜƟ ƝƔȴ μȲ μƮƟơƟ ƗơƝƘʎƟ ǎƢƒƥƦƔƥƛƔƜŭ ơȒƢƫ ƖȮƣ ǒƩƘƜƤ ƦȲƟ ƖƟʬƥƜƟ, ǓƫƤ ơȎ ƢƘƢƘƒƣƔƥƔƜ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. deest in Ƈ; accuratiss. vv. 592–3 ƾƞƞŪ ƘǮƗƐƟƔƜ – ƢƘƜƣƫμƐƟƚ post ƥƘ add. ƨƚƥȴ Ƈ ƦȲƟ ƖƟʬƥƜƟ scripsi: ƦȲƟ (om. Ƈ) ƢƒƥƦƜƟ codd. 2–3 ǓƫƤ ơȎ ƢƘƢƘƒƣƔƥƔƜ] ƢƣȴƟ ƢƘƜƣƔƛʀƟƔƜ Ƈ

154

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

592a2 (ƾƞƞŪ ƘǮƗƐƟƔƜ ƩƣȲ ƗƣʬƥƔƟ): ƗƘʎ ƥƘ, ƨƚƥƒƟ, ǎƢƜƩƘƜƣơʝƥƔƟ ƖƟʬƟƔƜ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris

593 (ǀƟ ƖƟʬμƔ): ƖƣƏƨƘƦƔƜ ǂƖƟƫμƔ. L 1 lm. add. Papageorgiou Ʀȶ ƖƟʬμƔ’ Dindorf 71

Ɩƣ. L

‘huic scholio manus multo recentior in L adscripsit

594 ƾƞƞŪ ƔȎƦƒƝŪ ƘǮƥƮμƘƛƔ : ƖƟƫƥƮμƘƛƔ, ƨƚƥƒ, ƦȲƟ ƗƯƟƔμƜƟ Ʀơʝ ƥƝƘƧƏƥμƔƦơƤŭ ƕƞƐƢƫ ƖȮƣ ƦȶƟ ſƒƩƔƟ ƢƞƚƥƒơƟ ƢơƣƘƧƮμƘƟơƟ, ȁƤ ƾƢơƝơμƒƥƘƜ ƦȶƟ ƢƐƢƞơƟ Ʀʭ ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ ƝƔȴ ǒƥƦƔƜ ǟμʎƟ ƗƜȮ ƦơƯƦơƧ ƢƘʎƣƔ. L T 1 lm.] ƾƞƞŪ ƔȎƦƒƝŪ tamquam initium scholii praebet Ƈ, (qui pergit ƨƚƥƒ, ƖƟƫƥƮμƘƛƔ, inverso ordine); accuratiss. vv. 594–5 ƾƞƞŪ ƔȎƦƒƝŪ – ƛƧƣƔʎơƟ ǢƗƚ 2 ƥƝƘƧƏƥμƔƦơƤ] ƝƔƦƔ- Ƈ ƢơƣƘƧƮμƘƟơƟ ſƇLp: ƢơƣƘƧƥƮμƘƟơƟ L, quam lectionem defendit Wansink 104–5 quasi grammaticus verba ƗƜȮ ƦƏƩơƧƤ ƗŪ ǎƞƘƯƥƘƦƔƜ v. 595 illustrare voluisset; re vera tamen ƛƧƣƔʎơƟ respicit

596a (ƥƦƘƖơƒμƘƛƔ): ƝƣƧƢƦơƒμƘƛƔ, ơǵơƟ ƥƜƫƢȲ ƖƐƟơƜƦơ. L 1 ƥƦƘƖơƒμƘƛƔ: cf. sch. Ph. 136 ƥƦƐƖƘƜƟ] ƝƣƯƢƦƘƜƟ; sch. Eur. Phoen. 1214 (ad lm. ƥƦƐƖƘƜƤ ȏƢȶ ƥƝƮƦʪ): a. ƝƔƞȹƢƦƘƜƤ ǎƟ ƾƨƔƟƘȵɯ, b. ƝƣȹƢƦƘƜƤ; Ɔ ƥ 199 ƥƦƘƖƮμƘƟƔŭ ƝƣƧƢƦƮμƘƟƔ = Phot. 536, 9 = Su. ƥ 1024 1 lm. add. Elmsley ƖƐƟơƜƦơ La.c.: ƖƐƟƚƦƔƜ Lp.c.

596b (ƥƝƮƦʪ): ƞƏƛƣɯ. Ls.l. Ts.l. cf. sch. Ant. 692 ȏƢȶ ƥƝƮƦơƧ] ƞƔƛƣƔƒƫƤ; ibid. 493 ubi ǎƟ ƥƝƮƦʪ per ƞƏƛƣɯ illustratur; sch. Ph. 578 ƝƔƦȮ ƥƝƮƦơƟ –| ƗƜƘμƢơƞɲ] ƞƏƛƣɯ ƾƢƔƦɲ 1 lm. add. Elmsley

sch. 592a2 – sch. 602b

155

597 ƢƣƏƥƥɾƤ : ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƢƣƏƥƥɾ ƦƜƤ, ȟƤ Ʀȶ ǒƟƛŪ ơȎƝ ǀƟ ƕƣƒƙơƟƦƔ DzƗơƜƤ. L; cf. gl. in Ts.l. 1–2 cf. sch. Hom. Il. 3.220a ƨƔȵƚƤ ƝƘƟ: ...ƝƔƦȮ μȱƟƦơƜ ƖƘ ȇμƚƣƜƝȲƟ ƥƧƟȳƛƘƜƔƟ ǎƝƞƚƢƦȱơƟ ǎƟ Dzƥʪ Ʀʭ ǒƨƚ ƦƜƤ ǂƟ, ȟƤ ǒƩƘƜ Ʀȶ «ǒƟƛŪ ơȎƝ ǀƟ ƕƣȵƙơƟƦƔ DzƗơƜƤ» (Ÿ 223) ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ DzƗơƜ ƦƜƤ ǂƟ; sch. Il. 4.223c. DzƗơƜƤ: {ȃƦƜ} ǟ ƗƜƢƞʀ, ȃƦƜ ơȎ ƢƣȶƤ ȏƨƘƥƦȶƤ ƢƣȷƥƫƢơƟ, ƾƞƞŪ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ DzƗơƜ ƦƜƤ ǂƟ 2 Hom. Il. 4.223 1 lm. scripsi (cf. gl. in T): μƮƟơƟ ƢƔƣŪ ȏμʬƟ ƘȔ (v. 596) L 1 ƾƟƦȴ – fin.] ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƢƣƏƥƥɾ ƦƜƤ gl. ad ƢƣƏƥƥɾƤ nec plura T ƢƣƏƥƥɾ Ƈ (coni. iam Kruytbosch 47): ƢƣƏƥƥơƜ L 2 ǀƟ ... DzƗơƜƤ] i.e. haec ǀƟ ... DzƗơƜ ƦƜƤ valent

599 (Ʀʭ μƔƝƣʭ ƩƣƮƟʪ): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƗƜȮ Ʀȶ ǎƟƦƔʝƛƔ ƩƣƮƟʪ ǎƟƗƜƔƦƣʎƪƔƜ. L 1 lm. add. Lascaris

ƩƣƮƟʪ del. Zielinski 54

602a ƘȎƧƨʀ ƢƐƢƞơƟ : ǮƥƩƟơƧƣƖʀŭ ơȎƝ ƘȔ ƗȰ ƦȶƟ ƾƟƗƣƘʎơƟ ƩƜƦʬƟƔ ƢƐƢƞơƟ ƨƚƥƒ. L 1 (lm.) ‘hoc vocabulum, ƦƔƟƔƭƨʀ, is legit in Sophoclis Trachiniis, qui annotavit ǮƥƩƟơƧƣƖʀ’ Wunder2 27

602b ƖƣƏƨƘƦƔƜ [ƗȰ] ƾƧƨʀ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƞƘƢƦơƭƨʀ. L 1 haec a sch. pr. separavi ƗȰ delevi Ɩƣ. L ƾƧƨʀ] ƦƔƟƔƭƨʀ Wunder2 27 (cf. Hesych. Ʀ 139 Ʀ Ɣ Ɵ ơ ƭ ƨ ʀ ŭ ƞƘƢƦơƭƨʀ; Phot. 568, 12 ƇƔƟƔƭƨʀ: ƞƘƢƦơƭƨʀ = Su. Ʀ 72)

156

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

607 [μƑƦŪ] ǎƨƐƥƦƜơƟ ƥƐƞƔƤ : ƾƟƦȴ Ʀȶ ƝƔƦŪ ơǴƝơƟ Ƣʝƣŭ ǓƣƝơƤ ƗȰ ǯƘƣƮƟ ǿ ƕƫμȶƤ Ǡ Ʀȶ ǯƘƣƮƟ. L; cf. gll. in Ts.l. 1 Ƣʝƣ: cf. sch. Ph. 986 ƥȱƞƔƤ ǧƨƔƜƥƦȷƦƘƧƝƦơƟ] Ʀȶ ǧƨƔȵƥƦƘƜơƟ Ƣʝƣ…; sch. Hom. Il. 19.17a … ƥƐƞƔƤ ƗȰ … ƢɱƟ Ƣʝƣ…; Hesych. ƥ 368 ƥƐƞƔƤŭ…Ƣʝƣ…; Phot. 505, 11 ƆƐƞƔƤ: Ƣʝƣ… = Su. ƥ 193 1 lm. L decurtavit Brunck2 1 ƾƟƦȴ – fin.] ǿ ƕƫμȶƤ Ǡ Ʀȶ ǯƘƣƮƟ gl. ad ǓƣƝơƤ ǯƘƣƮƟ et ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ Ʀȶ ƝƔƦŪ ơǴƝơƟ Ƣʝƣ gl. ad ǎƨƐƥƦƜơƟ ƥƐƞƔƤ nec plura T

608 ƢƣȴƟ ƝƘʎƟơƤ ƔȎƦƮƟ : ƢƣȴƟ ƔȎƦȶƤ ǎƟƗƧƥƏμƘƟơƤ ǎƢȴ ƦʀƤ ơǮƝƒƔƤ ƨƔƟƘƣȶƤ ƝƔȴ ȏƢŪ ȂƪƘƥƜ ƢƏƟƦƫƟ ƢƣơƘƞƛƘʎƟ, ƝƔƛŪ ǡƟ μƐƞƞƘƜ ƦƔƯƣơƧƤ ƛƯƘƜƟ ƦơʎƤ ƛƘơʎƤ ƘȎƩƔƣƜƥƦƑƣƜƔ. L T 1 lm. sic ſ: ƢƣȴƟ ƝƘʎƟơƤ L: deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 608–9 ƢƣȴƟ ƝƘʎƟơƤ – ƦƔƧƣơƥƨƏƖʪ; grammaticum pronomen ƔȎƦȷƟ (608) (ƔȎƦȶƟ ... ƗƘƒƠɾ) sensu ǏƔƧƦȷƟ accepisse et ad ǧƣƔƝƞʀ, non ad ƩƜƦʬƟƔ, rettulisse conieci ƔȎƦȶƤ] ǎƝƘʎƟơƤ T 2 ƨƔƟƘƣȶƤ Lp.c.: ƨƔƟƘƣʬƤ La.c.: om. T ƝƔȴ om. T ƢƣơƘƞƛƘʎƟ] ƢƣơƐƞƛɾ T post ƢƣơƐƞƛɾ add. ƝƔȴ ƗƘƒƠɾ ǏƔƧƦȶƟ ƨƔƟƘƣȶƟ ƦơʎƤ ƛƘơʎƤ ǎμƨƔƟʬƤ ƥƦƔƛƘȴƤ T ante ƝƔƛŪ ǡƟ add. ƝƔȴ L post ƝƔƛŪ ǡƟ add. ǟμƐƣƔƟ T μƐƞƞƘƜ T: μƐƞƞơƜ L

611 (ƢƔƟƗƒƝƫƤ): ƾƟƘƟƗơƜƏƥƦƫƤ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris

612 ƥƦƘƞƘʎƟ ƩƜƦʬƟƜ ƦʭƗƘ : ƥƝƘƢƏƥƘƜƟ, ǎƟƗƯƥƘƜƟ, ƢƘƣƜƕƔƞƘʎƟ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƦơƯƦʪ Ʀʭ ƩƜƦʬƟƜ < * * * * *> ƨƔƟʀƟƔƜ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƥƨƔƖƐƔ ƦʬƟ ƛƧμƏƦƫƟ. L 2 lacunam post ƩƜƦʬƟƜ statuerunt Papageorgiou et dubitanter Wansink 106; quam suppleam e.g. coll. sch. 613 post ƩƜƦʬƟƜ textum ita refinxerunt: ƨƔƟƘʎƟ etc Papageorgiou, ƨƔƟƘʎƟ etc Wansink l.c.

sch. 607 – sch. 616

157

613 (ƝƔƜƟƮƟ): ƝƔƜƟơƢƣƘƢʀ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris; (ƝƔƜƟȶƟ s.) L ƝƔƜƟơƢƣƘƢʀ] ƝƔƜƟơƢƣƘƢƘʎ T, quippe qui ad ƝƔƜƟʭ, non ƝƔƜƟƮƟ, adscribat glossam post ƝƔƜƟơƢƣƘƢƘʎ add. ƢƐƢƞʪ Ƈ

614 (ƾƢơƒƥƘƜƤ) ƥʀμŪ ȁ ƝƘʎƟơƤ ƘȎμƔƛƐƤ : ƘȒƖƟƫƥƦơƟ ƥƚμƘʎơƟ ƝơμȵƥƘƜƤ, ȃƢƘƣ ǎƝƘʎƟơƤ ǎƢƜƖƟȻƥƘƦƔƜ ǎƢƜƛƘȴƤ Ʀȶ ȂμμƔ Ʀʁ ƥƨƣƔƖʎƗƜ, ƖƟơȸƤ ȃƦƜ ƢƔƣŪ ǎμơʝ ƘDzƚ ǟ ƥƨƣƔƖȵƤ. L T 1 ƘȒƖƟƫƥƦơƟ: sch. Aeschin. 1, 8 ] ƘȎμƔƛȲƤ ƞƮƖơƤ ƞƐƖƘƦƔƜ ǿ ƘȒƖƟƫƥƦơƤ …; Thom. Mag. Ecl. 144, 7–8 ƝƔȴ ƘȎμƔƛȲƤ ǿ ƘȒƖƟƫƥƦơƤ; ƝơμƒƥƘƜƤ: cf. sch. Theocr. I 3–4h ƾƢơƜƥʁ: Ɲơμƒƥɾ 1 lm. L extendi: deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 614–5 ƦʬƟƗŪ ƾƢơƒƥƘƜƤ – ǎƢŪ ȂμμƔ ƛƑƥƘƦƔƜ ƘȒƖƟƫƥƦơƟ del. Lascaris ƘȒƖƟƫƥƦơƟ – ƝơμȵƥƘƜƤ ita retractavit T: ƝƔȴ ƝƮμƜƥơƟ ƨƚƥȴ Ʀȶ ƥƚμƘʎơƟ ƦʬƟƗƘ ƘȒƖƟƫƥƦơƟ 2 ante ƖƟơȸƤ add. ƝƔȴ T 3 ƘDzƚ] ǎƥƦƜƟ T, idque proposuit Blaydes 134

615 (ƥƨƣƔƖʎƗơƤ ǓƣƝƘƜ): ƢƘƣƜƨƣƔƥƦƜƝʬƤ Ʀʁ ƥƨƣƔƖʎƗƜ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris; (ƥƨƣƔƖƒƗơƤ, hoc accentu, s.) L ƢƘƣ. Ʀ. ƥƨ. L: ǢƦơƜ Ʀ. ƥƨ. ƢƘƣ. T

616 ƾƞƞŪ ǓƣƢƘ, ƝƔȴ ƨȹƞƔƥƥƘ : ơȕƦȷƤ ǎƥƦƜƟ ǿ ƢƣơƥȳƝƫƟ ƟȷμơƤ ƦơʎƤ ƗƜƔƝơƟơʝƥƜƟ ȣƥƦƘ μƚƗȰƟ ƢƘƣƔƜƦȱƣƫ ƗƣɱƟ ƦʬƟ ƢƣơƥƦƔƦƦơμȱƟƫƟ ƔȎƦơʎƤŭ ǎμƨƔȵƟƘƜ ƗȰ ƔȎƦʭ μȲ ƾƢơƥƨƣƔƖȵƥƔƟƦƔ ƢƘƣƜƘƣƖȯƙƘƥƛƔƜ Ʀȵ ǒƖƝƘƜƦƔƜ. L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 616–7 ƾƞƞŪ ǓƣƢƘ – ƢƘƣƜƥƥȮ ƗƣɱƟ ƢƣơƥȳƝƫƟ TLp 2 μƚƗȰƟ] μȲ T ƢƣơƥƦƔƦƦơμȱƟƫƟ] ƢƣơƥƦƘƦƔƖμȱƟƫƟ T (Lascaris): ƢƣơƥʀƝơƟ L ƔȎƦơʎƤ T (Lascaris): ƔȎƦʭ L 3 ƢƘƣƜƘƣƖȯƙƘƥƛƔƜ] ƢƘƣƜƘƣƖȯƥƔƥƛƔƜ T post ǒƖƝƘƜƦƔƜ add. ǎƟƦȷƤ T

158

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

618 ǒƢƘƜƛŪ ȃƢƫƤ ǀƟ ǟ ƩȯƣƜƤ : ƖƟƚƥȵƫƤ ƗƜƔƝơƟơȹμƘƟơƤ ƗƜƢƞƔƥƜȯƙƘƜƤ ƦȲƟ ƩȯƣƜƟ ƝƔȴ DzƥƫƤ ƨƜƞƚƛȳƥɾ ƢƔƣŪ ǏƝƔƦȱƣơƧ. L 1 lm. accuratiss. vv. 618–9 ǒƢƘƜƛŪ ȃƢƫƤ – ƗƜƢƞʀ ƨƔƟʁ Kruytbosch 47

ƗƜƢƞƔƥƜȯƙƘƜƤ] ƗƜƢƞƔƥƜȯƥƘƜƤ

620 (Ǘƣμơʝ–ƦȱƩƟƚƟ): ƝʀƣƧƠ ƖȮƣ ǿ ƛƘȷƤ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Papageorgiou

622 (ƦȷƗŪ ǂƖƖơƤ): Ʀȶ ƝƜƕȻƦƜơƟ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

623a ƞȷƖƫƟ ƦƘ ƢȵƥƦƜƟ ȥƟ ǒƩƘƜƤ : ǒƟƦƘƜƞƔƜ Ɨȱ μơƜ, ƨƚƥȵ, ƝƔȴ ƢƘƣȴ ƢƣƔƖμȯƦƫƟ ǂƞƞƫƟ μƧƥƦƜƝʬƟ ƝƔȴ ƞȷƖơƧƤ ƾƟƔƝơȵƟƫƥƔȵ μơƜ ƝƔȴ ƨƧƞȯƠƫ. LT 1–2 hoc sch. post sch. 623b praebet T 1 lm. deest in T; scholiastam ǎƨƏƣμơƥƔƜ pro ǎƨƔƣμƮƥƔƜ legisse coni. Wolff 217 ƨƚƥȵ om. T

623b (ƞȷƖƫƟ ƦƘ ƢȵƥƦƜƟ ȥƟ ǒƩƘƜƤ ǎƨƏƣμơƥƔƜ): ǎƢȵƛƘƤ, ƨƚƥȵƟ, ǡƟ ƛȱƞƘƜƤ ƥƨƣƔƖʎƗƔ. L T 1 lm. addidi; interpretem ǎƨƏƣμơƥƔƜ pro ǎƨƔƣμƮƥƔƜ habuisse conclusit Wolff 217 ƛȱƞƘƜƤ] ǒƩƘƜƤ T

628 ƢƣơƥƗȱƖμƔƦƔ : ȏƢơƗơƩȯƤ. ƞȱƖƘƜ ƗȰ ȃƦƜ ơǴƥƛƔ ƢʬƤ ƨƜƞơƨƣȷƟƫƤ ƔȎƦȲƟ ƢƣơƥƚƝȯμƚƟ. ƝƔȴ ƦơʝƦơ ƗȰ ǎƢƔƖƫƖȶƟ ƢƣȶƤ ǧƣƔƝƞȱƔ, ƘDz ƖƘ ƦȲƟ ȏƢơƟơơƧμȱƟƚƟ ƨƜƞơƨƣȷƟƫƤ ƢƣơƥƘƗȱƠƔƦơ. L T

sch. 618 – sch. 633a1

159

1 lm] pars ƞƐƖƘƜ (1) – fin. ad vv. 627–8 ƾƞƞŪ ơǴƥƛƔ – ƨƒƞƫƤ pertinet ȏƢơƗơƩȮƤ ƞƐƖƘƜ Ƈ ƞȱƖƘƜ] ƨƚƥȴ Ƈ 2 ƢƣơƥƚƝȯμƚƟ] ǎƗƘƠȯμƚƟ T add. ƝƔȴ ƘǮƢƐ Ƈ 3 Ƣƣ. ƨƜƞ. inverso ordine Ƈ

ȏƢơƗơƩȯƤ] ƦȮƤ post ǎƗƘƠƏμƚƟ

629 ȣƥƦŪ ǎƝƢƞƔƖʀƟƔƜ : ȃƦƜ ƾƥμȱƟƫƤ ƔȎƦȲƟ ȏƢƘƗȱƠƫŭ ȟƤ ƛƔƧμȯƥƔƜ μƘ ƝƔȴ ǎƢȴ ƦơȹƦʪ ƩƔƣʀƟƔƜ. L T 1 ƛƔƧμƏƥƔƜ: cf. Hesych. Ƙ 1623 ǎƝƢƞƔƖƘƒƤŭ ƛƔƧμƏƥƔƤ; ibid. Ƙ 3731 1–2 hoc sch. cum sch. 628 c. in Ƈ (ƢƣȶƤ ȁ ǎƢƏƖƘƜŭ ƦơƥơʝƦơƟ ơǴƗƔ ȣƥƦƘ ǎƝƢƞƔƖʀƟƔƜ) 1 lm.] tamquam partem scholii praebet Ƈ (vide notam praecedentem); accuratiss. v. 629 ȣƥƦ' ǎƝƢƞƔƖʀƟƔƜ – ƝƐƔƣ ȃƦƜ – ȏƢƘƗƐƠƫ] haec e lemmatis voce ǎƝƢƞƔƖʀƟƔƜ pendent, cf. sch. Ant. 376 ... ǎƝƢƞƑƦƦơƟƦƔƜ ȃƦƜ ƖƧƟȲ ǤƟ ǟ ȏƢƘƣƕɱƥƔ Ʀȶ ƝƑƣƧƖμƔ ȟƤ ƛƔƧμȯƥƔƜ μƘ om. Ƈ 2 ƦơȹƦʪ Ƈ, cf. sch. 763–4.2 ƩƔƒƣƫƟ ǎƢȴ Ʀʭ ƢƐƢƞʪ: ƦơƧƦơ, sine accentu L

630 ƗȱƗơƜƝƔ Ɩȯƣ : ƗȱƗơƜƝƔ Ɩȯƣ, ƨƚƥȵ, μȲ Ƣƣȶ ƝƔƜƣơʝ ƘDzƢơƜƤ ƦȶƟ ǎƠ ǎμơʝ ƢȷƛơƟ, ǓƫƤ μȯƛƫμƘƟ ƘǮ ƝƔȴ ƔȎƦȶƤ ǟμɱƤ ƢơƛƘʎ. ƗƜȮ ƗȰ ƦơȹƦƫƟ ǎƣƘƛȵƙƘƜ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƢƞȱơƟ ƘǮƢƘʎƟ. L 1 lm. accuratiss. vv. 630–2 ƗȱƗơƜƝƔ Ɩȯƣ – ƢơƛơƯμƘƛƔ expectes ǓƫƤ ǂƟ, sed vide ad sch. 144–9.1

ƘDzƢơƜƤ] ƘDzƢɾƤ a

2 ǓƫƤ]

633a1 Ȥ ƟƔȹƞơƩƔ : ǿ ƩơƣȶƤ ƦơȸƤ ƢƘƣȴ ƦȲƟ ƃDzƦƚƟ ơǮƝơʝƟƦƔƤ ƢƣơƥƝƔƞƘʎƦƔƜ ǎƢȴ Ʀʭ ƢƔƟƚƖƧƣȵƥƔƜ ƗƜȮ ƦȲƟ ƢƣơƥƗơƝƫμȱƟƚƟ ǎƢƜƗƚμȵƔƟ Ʀơʝ ǧƣƔƝƞȱơƧƤŭ ǿ ƗȰ ƟơʝƤŭ ơǯ ƦȮ ƢƔƣƔƛƔƞȯƥƥƜƔ ƛƘƣμȮ ƞơƧƦƣȮ ǎƟơƜƝơʝƟƦƘƤ ƝƔȴ ơǯ ƢƔƣȮ ƦơȸƤ ƦƣƔƩƘʎƤ ƝƔȴ ǾƣƘƜƟơȸƤ ƦȷƢơƧƤ ƦʀƤ ƃDzƦƚƤ 5 ƝƔȴ ƦȶƟ ƀƚƞƜƔƝȶƟ ƝȷƞƢơƟ, ǒƦƜ ƦƘ ƝƔȴ ƦȲƟ ƾƝƦȲƟ ƦʀƤ ƩƣƧƥơƦȷƠơƧ džƣƦȱμƜƗơƤ, ǒƟƛƔ ƨƔƥȴƟ ƘǴƟƔƜ ƦʬƟ ǗƞƞȳƟƫƟ ƦȮ ƥƧƟȱƗƣƜƔ, ǂƣƦƜ ǿ ƝƔƞƞƜƨƫƟȷƦƔƦơƤ ƢȯƞƜƟ ǣƠƘƜ ƔȎƞȶƤ ƝƔȴ ƝƔƦƔƞȳƪƘƦƔƜ ȏμʬƟ ƦȮƤ ƾƝơȮƤ ǟƗȹ ƦƜ ƝƔȴ μơƧƥƜƝȶƟ ƢƣơƥƢƟȱƫƟ. L T 6 ƾƖơƣƏ per ƥƧƟƐƗƣƜơƟ explicatur in e.g. sch. D Hom. Il. 1.54 ƾƖơƣȲƟ ƗȰ ƝƔƞƐƥƥƔƦơ: ǎƝƝƞƚƥƒƔƟ, ƥƧƟƐƗƣƜơƟ…; ibid. 1.305; Ɔb Ɣ 179 ƾƖơƣƑƟŭ ǎƝƝƞƚƥƒƔƟ, ƥƧƟƐƗƣƜơƟ…

160

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

1 lm. deest in Ƈ, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 634 coniungat (ƢƣơƥƝƔƞƘʎƦƔƜ ƗȰ; vide notam proxime sequentem); accuratiss. vv. 633–43 Ȥ ƟƔȹƞơƩƔ – μơƯƥƔƤ ǿ ƩơƣȶƤ – ƢƣơƥƝƔƞƘʎƦƔƜ ita reformavit Ƈ: ƢƣơƥƝƔƞƘʎƦƔƜ ƗȰ ǿ ƩơƣȶƤ ƦơȸƤ ƢƘƣȴ ƦơȸƤ ƦƣƔƩƘʎƤ ƝƔȴ ǾƣƘƜƟơȸƤ ƦƮƢơƧƤ ƦʀƤ ƃDzƦƚƤ ơǮƝơʝƟƦƔƤ 2 Ʀʭ Ƈ: Ʀȶ L 3 post ƟơʝƤ add. Ȥ ǂƟƗƣƘƤ Ƈ 4 ǎƟơƜƝơʝƟƦƘƤ] ơǮƝơʝƟƦƘƤ Ƈ ƢƔƣȮ] ƢƘƣȴ Ƈ 5 ƝƔȴ del. Papageorgiou, sed cf. sch. Hom. Il. 7.276c 6 ƨƔƥȴƟ Elmsley: ƨƚƥȴƟ codd. ‘i.e. Sophocles’ Wolff 14 7 ƔȎƞȶƤ post ƝƔƞƞƜƨƫƟƮƦƔƦơƤ transp. Ƈ ȏμʬƟ] ǟμʬƟ Ƈ 8 ƢƣơƥƢƟƐƫƟ om. Ƈ

633a2 Ȥ ƟƔȹƞơƩƔ : ƢƔƣƔƛƔƞȯƦƦƜƔ ƞơƧƦƣȯ. L T 1 lm. deest in Ƈ ƢƔƣƔƛƔƞƏƦƦƜƔ] ƢƔƣƔƛƔƞƏƥƥƜƔ Ƈ

633b1 (ƛƘƣμȮ ƞơƧƦƣƏ ): ƨƚƥȴ ƦȮ ǧƣȯƝƞƘƜƔ ǃƢƘƣ ƞȱƖƘƦƔƜ ƔȎƦʭ ǟ ʕŻƣƔ ƾƟƘʎƟƔƜŭ ƢƘƦƣƔʎƔ ƗȰ ƗƜȮ Ʀȶ ǎƟ ȂƣƘƜ Ʀʁ ƃDzƦɾ ƝƘʎƥƛƔƜŭ ǒƟƜơƜ ƗȰ ǎƟ ƆƜƝƘƞȵɯ ƨƔƥȴƟ ƾƟƔƗơƛʀƟƔƜ Ʀʭ ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ ƦȮ ƛƘƣμȮ ƞơƧƦƣȯ. L T 2 ǒƟƜơƜ – fin.: cf. Hesych. ƚ 722 ... ǂƞƞơƜ ƗȰ ƁȹμƨƔƤ ƔȎƦʭ ƢơƜʀƥƔƜ ǎƟ ƆƜƝƘƞȵɯ (scil. ƦȮ ƛƘƣμȮ ƞơƧƦƣƏ); Paus. att. ƚ 15 = Phot. ƚ 225 …ơǯ ƗȰ ǎƟ ƆƜƝƘƞȵɯ ƦȮƤ ƁȹμƨƔƤ… 1–3 haec a sch. 633a2 separavi 1 lm. addidi post ƨƚƥȴ add. ƗȰ L ǟ ʕŻƣƔ ƔȎƦʭ inverso ordine Ƈ ǫƣƔ] džƛƚƟɱ Lascaris coll. sch. vet. Ar. Nub. 1051a et b prob. Wansink 107, fortasse recte, quamquam tales errores scholiastae non desunt; cf. ad sch. El. 62.7

633b2 ƛƘƣμȮ ƞơƧƦƣƏ : ƗơƝƘʎ ƦơʝƦơ ƢƔƣŪ ǯƥƦơƣȵƔƟ ƘǴƟƔƜŭ ƨƔƥȴ ƖȮƣ ƢƣʬƦơƟ ǎƟ ƇƣƔƩʎƟƜ Ʀʭ ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ ƾƟƔƗƘƗȷƥƛƔƜ, ǎƟƦƔʝƛƔ ƗȰ ȟƤ ƢƣơƭƢƔƣƩȷƟƦƫƟ ƔȎƦʬƟ ƨƚƥƜƟ. L 1–3 haec scholio 633a1 anteposuit L

1 lm. scripsi: Ȥ ƟƔƯƞơƩƔ ƝƔȴ ƢƘƦƣƔʎƔ L

634 ƝƔȴ ƢȯƖơƧƤ : ƢȯƖơƜ ƘǮƥȴƟ ȏƪƚƞơȴ ƦȷƢơƜ Ǡ Ɣǯ ǾƠƘʎƔƜ ƢȱƦƣƔƜŭ ƝƔȴ ơǯ ƢƔƣȮ ƦơȸƤ ƦƣƔƩƘʎƤ ƝƔȴ ǾƣƘƜƟơȸƤ ƦȷƢơƧƤ ƦʀƤ ƃDzƦƚƤ ơǮƝơʝƟƦƘƤ. L T

sch. 633a1 – sch. 637a1

161

1 ƢƏƖơƜ – ƢƐƦƣƔƜ: cf. sch. Hom. Od. 5.405 ƢȯƖơƜ] Ɣǯ ƘǮƤ ȓƪơƤ ƗƜȳƝơƧƥƔƜ ƢȱƦƣƔƜ, Ǡ ƢƘƦƣȻƗƘƜƤ ǎƠơƩƔȵ QT. ơǯ ǾƠƘʎƤ ƦȷƢơƜ, Ɣǯ ƢƘƦƣȻƗƘƜƤ ǎƠơƩƔȵ. Ǡ ǾƠƘʎƔƜ ƢȱƦƣƔƜ, Ǡ ƘǮƤ ȓƪơƤ ƾƟȱƩơƧƥƔƜ ƢȱƦƣƔƜ. ƾƟƔƦƘƦƔμȱƟơƜ ƦȷƢơƜ V; Apollon. S. 126, 4 ƢȯƖơƜŭ Ɣǯ ǎƠơƩƔȴ ƦʬƟ ƢƘƦƣʬƟ ƝƔȴ ƦʬƟ ǾƣʬƟ· «ƥƢƜƞȯƗƘƤ ƦƘ ƢȯƖơƜ ƦƘ.»; Hesych. Ƣ 27 ƢȯƖơƜŭ Ɣǯ ǎƠơƩƔȴ ƦʬƟ ƢƘƦƣʬƟ ƝƔȴ ƦʬƟ ǾƣʬƟ = Ɔ Ƣ 5 = Phot. 368, 3 = Su. Ƣ 16; cf. praeterea sch. 1191 et sch. Ant. 985 ubi ƢƏƖơƤ per ȂƣơƤ explicatur 1 lm. deest in Ƈ; pars ƝƔȴ (1) – fin. vv. 634–5 ƢƏƖơƧƤ – ƢƔƣƔƟƔƜƘƦƏơƟƦƘƤ explicat ȏƪƚƞơȴ] ơǯ ȏƪ. Ƈ ƝƔȴ – fin. om. Ƈ

636 ƀƚƞȵƗƔ ƢƔƣȮ ƞȵμƟƔƟ : ƞȵμƟƚƟ ƨƚƥȴ ƦȲƟ ƛȯƞƔƥƥƔƟŭ ȋμƚƣơƤ

ƔǮƛƧȵɯ ƗŪ ǎƜƝƧʎƔ ƢơƦʁ ƾƟƘƗȹƥƔƦơ ƞȵμƟƚƤŭ ǿ ƗȰ ƀƚƞƜƔƝȶƤ ƝȷƞƢơƤ ƇƣƔƩȵƟƜȷƤ ǎƥƦƜƟ. L T 1 ƞƒμƟƚƟ – ƛƏƞƔƥƥƔƟ: cf. sch. Eur. Hec. 446 … ƞȵμƟƚƟ ƦȲƟ ƛȯƞƔƥƥȯƟ ƨƚƥƜƟ ȋμƚƣơƤ [Ɩ 1]· «ǦȱƞƜơƤ ƗŪ ƾƟȷƣơƧƥƘ ƞƜƢȺƟ ƢƘƣƜƝƔƞƞȱƔ ƞȵμƟƚƟ»…; sch. Ar. Av. 1339 ǎƢŪ ơǴƗμƔ ƞƒμƟƔƤ: ƝƔȴ ơȕƦơƤ ƞƒμƟƚƟ ƦȲƟ ƛƏƞƔƥƥƔƟ ƘDzƣƚƝƘƟ; sch. D Hom. Il. 13.32 ƞƒμƟƚƤ: ƟʝƟ ƦʀƤ ƛƔƞƏƥƥƚƤ…; sch. Hom. Il. 21.317b; Apollon. S. 108, 28 ƞ ƒ μ Ɵ ƚ ǎƢȴ μȰƟ ƦʀƤ ƛƔƞƏƥƥƚƤ «ƕƔƛƘƒɾ ƗŪ ǒμƢƘƥƘ ƞƒμƟɾ,»…; Apion 246, 1 L. ƞƒμƟƚŭ ǟ ƛƏƞƔƥƥƔ (Ƙ 337)…; Hesych. ƞ 1039 ƞƒμƟƚŭ ǟ ƛƏƞƔƥƥƔ…; Phot. ƞ 321 ƞƜμƟƚƟŭ ƦȲƟ ƛƏƞƔƥƥƔƟ ƝƧƣƒƫƤ; Su. ƞ 551 ſ ƒ μ Ɵ ƚ : ǟ ƛƏƞƔƥƥƔ ƢƔƣŪ ȇμƑƣʪ, ƝƔȴ ….; Eust. Il. IV 507, 1 ȋμƚƣơƤ: Od. 5.337 1 lm. deest in T, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 633b1 coniungat (ƞƒμƟƚƟ ƗȰ) 1 ȋμƚƣơƤ – 2 ƞƒμƟƚƤ om. T 2 ƔǮƛƧƒɯ hoc scripsisse scholiastam censeo: ƔǮƛƧȵƔ ſ: ƔǮƛƯƔƜ L (cf. ad sch. 504.1): ƔǮƛƧƒɾ Homerus 3 ƇƣƔƩȵƟƜơƤ] ƇƣƔƩʎƟơƤ Kruytbosch 48 et dubitanter proposuit Papageorgiou coll. sch. Ph. 453, 725

637a1 (ƩƣƧƥƔƞƔƝȯƦơƧ ƦŪ ƾƝƦȮƟ ƝƮƣƔƤ): ǎƟ ŹȎƕơȵɯ ƦƜμɱƦƔƜ ƩƣƧƥȷƦơƠơƤ NJƣƦƘμƜƤ, ȃƢơƧ ƝƔȴ ǟ ǎƢŪ džƣƦƘμƜƥƒʪ ƟƔƧμƔƩƒɯ ƥƧƟƐƕƚ ƦơʎƤ ǛƞƞƚƥƜƟ. L; cf. sch. retractatum in Ts.l. 1–2 cf. Hdt. VII 176 ǎƝ ƗȰ Ʀơʝ ƥƦƘƜƟơʝ ƦʀƤ ŹȎƕơȵƚƤ ǢƗƚ Ʀȶ džƣƦƘμȵƥƜơƟ ƗȱƝƘƦƔƜ ƔǮƖƜƔƞȷƤ, ǎƟ ƗȰ džƣƦȱμƜƗơƤ ǯƣȷƟ; Plut. Them. 8 ǒƩƘƜ ƗȰ ƟƔȶƟ (scil. Ʀȶ džƣƦƘμƒƥƜơƟ) ơȎ μȱƖƔƟ džƣƦȱμƜƗơƤ ǎƢȵƝƞƚƥƜƟ ƄƣơƥƚʫƔƤ 1 ƩƣƧƥƮƦơƠơƤ: sch. D Hom. Il. 16.183 ƩƣƧƥƚƞƔƝƏƦơƧ: ƝƔƞƞƜƦƮƠơƧ, Ǡ ƩƣƧƥʭ Ʀʭ ƕƐƞƘƜ ƩƣƫμƐƟƚƤ; ibid. 20.70 ƩƣƧƥƚƞƏƝƔƦơƤ: … ƟʝƟ ƗȰ ƦʀƤ ƩƣƧƥơʝƟ ƦƮƠơƟ ǎƩơƯƥƚƤ, ƦơƠƘƧƦƜƝʀƤ; ibid. 6.491; sch. Hom. Il. 16.183b ƩƣƧƥƚƞƔƝȯƦơƧ: ƩƣƧƥơʎƤ ƕȱƞƘƥƜ ƩƣƫμȱƟƚƤ· ƦȶƟ ƝȯƞƔμơƟ ƖȮƣ ƦʬƟ ƕƘƞʬƟ ƦƜƟƘƤ ǞƞƔƝȯƦƚƟ ƨƔƥȵ…; Apollon. S. 168, 29 ƩƣƧƥƚƞƔƝȯƦơƧ ƝƔƞƞƜƦȷƠơƧ;

162

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

Hesych. Ʃ 783 ƩƣƧƥƚƞȯƝƔƦơƤŭ ƝƔƞƞȵƦơƠơƤŭ ǞƞƔƝȯƦƚ ƖȮƣ ǿ ƦơƠƜƝȶƤ ƝȯƞƔμơƤ; Ɔ Ʃ 131 ƩƣƧƥƚƞȯƝƔƦơƤŭ ǟ ƝƔƞƞȵƦơƠơƤ, ǟ ƩƣƧƥȷƦơƠơƤ = Su. Ʃ 562; Eust. Il. III 832, 2–3 ƾƟƔμƟƚƥƦȱơƟ ƗŪ ǎƟƦƔʝƛƔ, ȃƦƜ ƦƘ ǞƞȯƝƔƦƔ ơȎƗƘƦȱƣƫƤ ƝƔȴ ƦȮ ƦȷƠƔ, ȃƛƘƟ ƩƣƧƥƚƞȯƝƔƦơƤ ǟ ƩƣƧƥȷƦơƠơƤ; ibid. IV 372, 20 1 lm. addidi ǎƟ – 2 NJƣƦƘμƜƤ] ita retractavit T: ƦȲƟ ŹȒƕơƜƔƟ ƗƚƞơƟƮƦƜ ȃƢơƧ ƦƜμɱƦƔƜ ƩƣƧƥƮƦơƠơƤ NJƣƦƘμƜƤ 2 ȃƢơƧ – fin.] inter sch. 637a3.2 ƇƣƔƩʎƟƔ et ǎƟ żƘƣμơƢƯƞƔƜƤ inserta in L huc transp. Wolff 199–200 (quem secutus sum coll. Hdt. et Plut. ll.cc.): om. T

637a2 ƘǮƤ Ʀȶ ƔȎƦȷ: ƦȲƟ ƀƔƖƟƚƥƒƔƟ. L 1 hoc sch. post sch. 638 scriptum in L huc traieci vidit Wolff 200

1 haec verba sui iuris scholium esse

637a3 (ƩƣƧƥƔƞƔƝƏƦơƧ ƦŪ ƾƝƦȮƟ ƝƮƣƔƤ): [ǒƟƛƔ] ƦȲƟ ƦʀƤ džƣƦȱμƜƗơƤ ƢƔƣƔƛƔƞƏƥƥƜơƟ ƇƣƔƩʎƟƔŭ ǎƟ żƘƣμơƢȹƞƔƜƤ. L 1–2 haec a sch. 637a2 separavi 1 lm. addidi ǒƟƛƔ delevi ut vocem cui sch. 637a3 2 cum a copulatum est ƦȲƟ ƦʀƤ scripsi: ƦȶƟ ƦʀƤ L 2 post ƇƣƔƩʎƟƔ verba ȃƢơƧ ƝƔȴ ǟ ǎƢŪ džƣƦƘμƜƥƒʪ ƟƔƧμƔƩƒƔ ƥƧƟƐƕƚ ƦơʎƤ ǛƞƞƚƥƜƟ leguntur in L quae post sch. 637a1.1 ƩƣƧƥƮƦơƠơƤ collocavit Wolff 199–200 (vide ad sch. 637a1.2)

638 ǒƟƛŪ ǗƞƞȯƟƫƟ ƾƖơƣƔȵ : ȃƢơƧ ƥƧƟȯƖơƟƦƔƜ ơǯ džμƨƜƝƦȹơƟƘƤ ƘǮƤ ƦȲƟ ƞƘƖơμȱƟƚƟ ƄƧƞƔȵƔƟ ƢƘƣȴ ǥƤ džƖȯƛƫƟ ƨƚƥȴ ƄƧƞȯƗƚƟ ƦȶƟ ƆƦƣơƨȵơƧ ƢƣʬƦơƟ ƥƧƥƦȳƥƔƥƛƔƜ ǎƟ Ʀʁ ƉƫƝȵƗƜ ƝƔƛƔƜƣȷμƘƟơƟ Ʀȶ ǎƢȴ žƞƧƦƔƜμȳƥƦƣɯ μȹƥơƤ ƝƔȴ ƾƢŪ ƔȎƦơʝ ƦȲƟ ƥȹƟơƗơƟ ƄƧƞƔȵƔƟ ƨƚƥȴ ƢƣơƥƔƖơ5 ƣƘȹƘƥƛƔƜŭ Ǡ ȃƦƜ ƇƣƔƩȴƟ Ƣȹƞƚ ƦʀƤ ǗƞƞƏƗơƤ ǎƥƦƒƟ. L T 1 ȃƢơƧ – 2 ƄƧƞƔƒƔƟ: cf. Hesych. Ƣ 4348 ƢƧƞȯƦƜƗƘƤ ƾƖơƣƔȵŭ ȃƢơƧ ƥƧƟȵƔƥƜƟ ơǯ džμƨƜƝƦȹơƟƘƤ ƘǮƤ ƦȲƟ ƞƘƖơμȱƟƚƟ ƄƧƞƔȵƔƟ ǎƟ Ʀʁ ƢƔƟƚƖȹƣƘƜ 2 džƖƏƛƫƟ] fragmentum Ag. Samio (FGrHist 843) tribuit Stiehle2 482 4 ƾƢŪ ƔȎƦơʝ – fin.] aliter Strab. IX 3, 7 ƦȲƟ ƗȰ ƥƯƟơƗơƟ ƄƧƞƔƒƔƟ ǎƝƏƞơƧƟ … ǎƢƘƜƗȲ ǎƟ ƄƯƞƔƜƤ ƥƧƟƑƖơƟƦơ (ǁƤ ƝƔȴ żƘƣμơƢƯƞƔƤ ƝƔƞơʝƥƜƟ) 5 ƇƣƔƩȴƟ – fin.: cf. Hdt. VII 176 ǧ ƗȰ ƔȔ ƗƜȮ ƇƣƚƩʎƟơƤ ǒƥơƗơƤ ǎƤ ƦȲƟ ǗƞƞȯƗƔ ǎƥƦȴ Ʀʁ ƥƦƘƜƟơƦȯƦƚ ǟμȵƢƞƘƛƣơƟ.

sch. 637a1 – sch. 643a2

163

1 lm.] ǒƟƛŪ ǗƞƞƏƟƫƟ T; accuratiss. v. 638 ǒƟƛŪ ǗƞƞƏƟƫƟ – ƝƔƞƐơƟƦƔƜ post ƥƧƟƏƖơƟƦƔƜ add. ƨƚƥȴƟ T džμƨƜƝƦȹơƟƘƤ T (Lascaris): ƾμƨƜƝƦƧƮƟƘƤ sic L 3– 4 žƞƧƦƔƜμȳƥƦƣɯ] žƞƧƦƔƜμƟȳƥƦƣɯ T ƨƚƥȴ del. Kruytbosch 48 5 Ǡ – fin. om. T ƇƣƔƩȴƟ (ƦƣƔƩƒƚ L)] ǿ ƦƮƢơƤ Lascaris: del. Papageorgiou quippe qui ƇƣƔƩʎƟơƤ ex L retinuisset (vide notam proximam) ǗƞƞƏƗơƤ Lascaris prob. Wolff 199 et Zielinski 55 (contuli Hdt. l.c.): ƇƣƔƩʎƟơƤ L

640–3 (ơȎƝ ƾƟƔƣƥƒƔƟ – μơƯƥƔƤ): ơȎƝ ǎƩƛƣȮƟ ơȎƗŪ ƾƢƘƧƝƦȲƟ ƨƫƟȲƟ ƾƞƞȮ ƛƘȵƔƤ μơȹƥƚƤ ƾƟƦȵƞƧƣơƟ, ȃ ǎƥƦƜ ƨƫƟʀƤ ƖƞƧƝƘȵƔƤ. L T 1 ǎƩƛƣƏƟ: cf. sch. 852.3; sch. D Hom. Il. 24.365 ƾƟƏƣƥƜơƜ: ǂƗƜƝơƜ, ǎƩƛƣơƒ; sch. Hom. Il. 24.365a2; sch. Ap. Rh. 154, 18–9 Ʀȶ ƗȰ ƾƟȯƣƥƜơƤ… ƥƚμƔȵƟƘƜ ƗȰ ƝƔȴ ƦȶƟ ǎƩƛƣȷƟ…; Phot. Ɣ 1647 ƾƟƔƣƥȵƔƤ· ǎƩƛƣȯƤ. ơȓƦƫƤ ǺƫƟ (TrGF 19 F 53d) 1–2 haec a sch. 633a1 separavi ƖƞƧƝƘȵƔƤ] ƖƞƧƝƘʎƔ ƨƫƟȳ T

1 lm. addidi

ƾƢƘƧƝƦȲƟ] ƾƢƘƩƛʀ Lp

2 ƨƫƟʀƤ

641 (ơȎƝ ƾƟƔƣƥȵƔƟ): ơȎƝ ǎƩƛƣȮƟ ơȎƗȰ ƛƣȳƟƫƟ ƕơȳƟ. L 1 ǎƩƛƣƏƟ: vide ad sch. 640–3 1 lm. add. Brunck2

ƛƣƑƟƫƟ] ƛƣƚƟưƗƚ Nauck 433

643a1 ƾƟƦȵƞƧƣơƟ : ƾƟƦƒμƜμơƟ, ƾƟƦʪƗƮƟ. L T 1 de sensu ƾƟƦƒμƜμơƟ cf. sch. Ph. 1460 ƾƟƦƒƦƧƢơƟ] ƾμơƜƕƔʎơƟ, ƾƟƦƒμƜμơƟ, sch. Ar. Th. 17 ƾƟƦƒμƜμơƟ: ȃμơƜơƟ... post ƾƟƦƒμƜμơƟ et ƾƟƦʪƗƮƟ subauditur ƞƯƣɯ

643a2 (ƾƟƦƒƞƧƣơƟ): ƾƟƦȴ ơȎ μơƧƥƜƝȲƟ ƨƫƟƑƟ, ƾƞƞȮ ƦȲƟ ǎƝ Ʀơʝ ǎƟƔƟƦȵơƧ μȱƣơƧƤ ƦʀƤ ƞȹƣƔƤ ƨƫƟƑƟŭ ƾƨŪ ơȕ ƗƚƞơʝƦƔƜ, ǿμơʝ ƔȎƞȶƤ ƝƔȴ ƞȹƣƔ ƾƟƔƨƫƟȳƥơƧƥƜƟ. L T 1–3 haec a sch. pr. separavi 1 lm. addidi ƾƟƦȴ] ƾƟ. Ʀơʝ T ȃƦƜ T (add. iam Lascaris) ǿμơʝ post ƞƯƣƔ transp. T

2 post ƗƚƞơʝƦƔƜ add.

164

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

643a3 (ƾƟƦƒƞƧƣơƟ): ǮƥȷƞƧƣơƟ. L 1 lm. addidi

645 (ƥƘʝƦƔƜ): ǿƣμɱƦƔƜ, ǣƠƘƜ. L 1 cf. e.g. sch. OC 119 ƥƧƛƘȵƤ] ǿƣμȳƥƔƤ; sch. Aesch. Ch. 640b ƥơʝƦƔƜ] ǿƣμɲ; sch. Theocr. III 24c … ƥƘƯƫ Ʀȶ ǿƣμʬ; sch. Hom. Il. 23.198b1; 23.198b2; sch. D Hom. Il. 2.808; 6.505; 11.419; 13.79; 15.681; 22.146; sch. Pi. O. 1.32c; 1.33b 1 lm. add. Lascaris; (ƥƘʝƦƔƜ s.) L

647 ȁƟ ƾƢȷƢƦơƞƜƟ ƘDzƩơμƘƟ : ȁƟ ǎƝƦȶƤ ƘDzƩơμƘƟ ƦʀƤ ƢȷƞƘƫƤ ƘǮƤ ƗƫƗƘƝȯμƚƟơƟ ƾƟƔμȱƟơƧƥƔƜ. L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 647–9 ȁƟ ƾƢȷƢƦơƞƜƟ – ƩƣƮƟơƟ

647–9 (ȁƟ ƾƢƮƢƦơƞƜƟ … ƢƘƞƏƖƜơƟ): Ʀȶ [ƗȰ] ǏƠʀƤŭ ȁƟ ƾƢȷƢƦơƞƜƟ ƢƘƞȯƖƜơƟ, ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǂƢơƛƘƟ ƦʀƤ ƢȷƞƘƫƤ ǎƟ Ʀʭ ƢƘƞȯƖƘƜ. L T 1–2 haec a sch. pr. separavi ǂƢƫƛƘƟ Ƈ

1 lm. addidi

ƗȰ delevi

2 ǂƢơƛƘƟ L, retinendum:

649 ƢƘƞȯƖƜơƟ : ȃƦƜ ƢơƞƞȯƝƜƤ ƝƔȴ ƗƜȮ ƛƔƞȯƦƦƚƤ ǒƢƞƘƘƟ, ƘDz ƢơƦƘ ƘǮƤ ƟȳƥơƧƤ ƾƢɿƘƜ. L T 1 hoc sch. cum sch. 647–9 c. in T (ƢƘƞƏƖƜơƟ ƗȰ)

650 (ƗȯμƔƣ): ǟ ŸƚƜȯƟƘƜƣƔ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Papageorgiou

ƛƔƞƏƦƦƚƤ] ƛƔƞƏƥƥƚƤ T

sch. 643a3 – sch. 656a

165

652 (ȢƞƞƧƦơ): ƗƜƘƨƛƘȵƣƘƦơ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

653a ƟʝƟ ƗŪ NJƣƚƤ ơǮƥƦƣƚƛƘȵƤ : μƔƟƘȴƤ ǿ ƢƘƣȴ ƦȲƟ ƃǮƩƔƞȵƔƟ ƢȷƞƘμơƤ ǎƠȱƞƧƥƘƟ ǟμɱƤ ƦʀƤ ƾƟȵƔƤ ǡƟ ǎƨŪ ǏƝȯƥƦƚƤ ǟμȱƣƔƤ ƘDzƩơμƘƟ. L T 1 μƔƟƘƒƤ: cf. Hesych. ơ 411 ơǮƥƦƣƘʎŭ ǎƝμƔƒƟƘƜ; Ɔ ơ 77 ơǮƥƦƣƘʎŭ … ǎƝμƔƒƟƘƜ = Phot. 324, 3 = Su. ơƜ 178 1–2 sch. 653a et b in unum ita composuit T: NJƣƚƤ: ǿ ƢƘƣȴ ƦȲƟ ƃǮƩƔƞƒƔƟ ƢƣȶƤ ƦȶƟ ŹȒƣƧƦơƟ ƢƮƞƘμơƤŭ ǎƠ ƔȎƦơʝ ƖȮƣ ƘȎƛȸƤ ǎƢƔƟʀƞƛƘƟ. ǖƠƐƞƧƥƘƟ ǟμɱƤ ƨƚƥȴ ƦʀƤ ƾƟƒƔƤ ǡƟ ǎƨŪ ǏƝƏƥƦƚƤ ǟμƐƣƔƤ ƘDzƩơμƘƟ 1 lm.] e verbis ǎƠƐƞƧƥƘƟ ... ƦʀƤ ƾƟƒƔƤ (2) commentatorem pro ǎƠƐƞƧƥŪ ǎƢƒƢơƟơƟ ƿμƐƣƔƟ habuisse ǎƠƐƞƧƥŪ ǎƢƜƢƮƟƫƟ ƿμƘƣɱƟ in libro suo collegit Wunder3 39; accuratiss. vv. 653–4 ƟʝƟ ƗŪ NJƣƚƤ – ƿμƐƣƔƟ

653b ƘǮƤ Ʀȶ ƔȎƦȷ: ƟʝƟ ƗŪ NJƣƚƤ: ǿ ƢƣȶƤ ƦȶƟ ŹȒƣƧƦơƟŭ ǎƠ ƔȎƦơʝ ƖȮƣ ƘȎƛȸƤ ǎƢƔƟʀƞƛƘƟ. L T 1–2 de T vide ad sch. 653a.1–2

655 μȲ ƥƦƔȵƚ ƢơƞȹƝƫƢơƟ : μƚƗƔμơʝ ǟ ƟƔʝƤ ƾƞƞƔƩơʝ ǿƣμȵƥƔƜ, ǓƫƤ ǎƟƦƔʝƛƔ ƾƨȵƝơƜƦơ, ƦȲƟ ŹȒƕơƜƔƟ ƟʀƥơƟ ȏƢƘƣƕȮƤ ƝƔȴ ƝƔƦƔƞƜƢȻƟŭ ƝƔƦƔƥƦƣƘƪȯμƘƟơƤ ƖȮƣ ƦȲƟ ƃǮƩƔƞȵƔƟ ǎƝƘʎ ǒμƘƜƟƘƟ ƛʝƥƔƜ Ʀʭ ƢƔƦƣȵ. L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 655–9 μȲ ƥƦƔƒƚ – ƛƧƦƑƣ 1 ǟ ƟƔʝƤ ... ǿƣμƒƥƔƜ] expectares ƦȲƟ ƟƔʝƟ ... ǿƣμƒƥƔƜ vel ǟ ƟƔʝƤ ... ǿƣμƑƥƔƜ, at cf. sch. Hom. Od. 9.182, 2 ƾƨƒƝơƜƦơ – 3 ƃǮƩƔƞƒƔƟ] sch. Ph. 244, 545 ubi ǿƣμƒƙƫ intransitive usurpatur ƾƨƒƝơƜƦơŭ ƦȲƟ ŹȒƕơƜƔƟ ƖȮƣ ȏƢƘƣƕȮƤ ƝƔȴ ƝƔƦƔƥƦƣƘƪƏμƘƟơƤ ƦȲƟ ƃǮƩƔƞƒƔƟ T

656a (ȂƩƚμƔ ƟƔƮƤ): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǟ ƟƔʝƤ. Ls.l. 1 lm. addidi

166

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

656b (ƔȎƦʭ ): Ʀʭ ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ. Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

660a1 ƢƔƟȯμƘƣơƤ : ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƦȲƟ ƥȳμƘƣơƟ ǟμȱƣƔƟ ǒƞƛơƜ Ʀʭ ƢȱƢƞʪ ƦʀƤ ƢƘƜƛơʝƤ ƛƘƞƩƛƘȴƤ ǎƝ ƢƣơƨȯƥƘƫƤ Ʀơʝ ƁȱƥƥơƧ ƝƔƦƘƥƝƘƧƔƥμȱƟʪŭ ƢƘƜƛơʝƤ ƗȰ ƢȱƢƞʪ ƘǴƢƘƟ ȃƦƜ ƖȱƖơƟƘƟ ǎƢȴ Ʀʭ μƘƦƔƢƘȵƛƘƜƟ ƝƔȴ μƘƦƔƦƜƛȱƟƔƜ ƦȲƟ ǧƣƔƝƞȱơƧƤ ƖƟȻμƚƟ ǎƢȴ ƦȲƟ ŸƚƜȯƟƘƜƣƔƟ. L T 1 ƦȲƟ ƥƑμƘƣơƟ ǟμƐƣƔƟ: cf. sch. 660a2; aliter sch. Ap. Rh. 190, 1 ubi ƢƔƟƑμƘƣơƜ per ƗƜŪ ȃƞƚƤ ƦʀƤ ǟμƐƣƔƤ explicatur; Poll. I 64 Ʀȶ ƗȰ ƗƜŪ ȃƞƚƤ ƦʀƤ ǟμƐƣƔƤ ƢƣƔƦƦƮμƘƟơƟ ƢƔƟƑμƘƣơƟ; Hesych. Ƣ 310 ƢƔƟȯμƘƣơƤŭ ƗƜŪ ȃƞƚƤ ǟμȱƣƔƤ; Phot. 376, 4 ƄƔƟȯμƘƣơƟ: ƗƜŪ ȃƞƚƤ ƦʀƤ ǟμȱƣƔƤ. 1 lm.] μƮƞơƜ ƢƔƟƏμƘƣơƤ T; accuratiss. vv. 660–2 ȃƛƘƟ μƮƞơƜ – ƛƚƣƮƤ; ƢƔƖƩƣƒƥƦʪ neutrum adiectivi pro substativo dictum interpretatus est scholiasta, i.q. Ʀȶ ƢƏƖƩƣƜƥƦơƟ 2 ƢƣơƨƏƥƘƫƤ] ƢƔƣƔƜƟƐƥƘƫƤ T ƁƐƥƥơƧ] ƁƐƥơƧ codd. omnes, simplici ƥ, ut semper 3 ƖƐƖơƟƘƟ post ƖƟưμƚƟ (4) transp. T ǎƢȴ Ʀʭ Ƈ: ǎƢȴ Ʀȶ L μƘƦƔƢƘƒƛƘƜƟ] ƝƔƦƔƢƘʎƥƔƜ T μƘƦƔƦƜƛƐƟƔƜ Elmsley: μƘƦƔƦƘƛƘʎƟƔƜ L: μƘƦƔƛƘʎƟƔƜ T (Lascaris)

660a2 ƢƔƟȯμƘƣơƤ : ƘȎμƘƟȲƤ ǎƟ Ʀʁ ƔȎƦʁ ǟμȱƣɯ ǒƞƛơƜ ƘǮƤ ǒƣƫƦƔ ƦʀƤ ƖƧƟƔƜƝȶƤ ƗƜȮ Ʀȶ Ʀơʝ ƁȱƥƥơƧ ƨȯƣμƔƝơƟ. L T 1 ǎƟ Ʀʁ ƔȎƦʁ ǟμƐƣɯ: cf. sch. 660a1 et locos similes ibi laudatos 1 lm. deest in T, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 660a1 copulet (Ǡ etc); accuratiss. 660–2 μƮƞơƜ – ƛƚƣƮƤ ƘȎμƘƟȲƤ om. T ǎƟ] Ǡ ǎƟ T ǒƞƛơƜ T (coni. iam Matthiae 89 et Kruytbosch 48): ǒƞƛơƜƤ L 2 Ʀơʝ om. T

661 ƢƔƖƩƣȵƥƦʪ : ƞƘȵƢƘƜ Ʀȶ ƢȱƢƞʪ, ƥƧƖƝƘƝƣƔμȱƟơƤ ƝƔȴ ƿƣμơƥƛƘȴƤ Ʀʁ ƢƘƜƛơʎ Ʀơʝ ƛƚƣȷƤ. L T 1 hoc sch. cum sch. 660a2 c. in Ƈ (ƢƔƖƩƣƒƥƦʪ ƗȰ); scholiasta ƢƔƖƩƣƒƥƦʪ pro substantivo intellexisse vidit Jebb 102; (vide ad sch. 660a1.1) lm.] pars ƥƧƖƝƘƝƣƔμȱƟơƤ (1) – fin. vv. 661–2 ƦɱƤ ƢƘƜƛơʝƤ – ƛƚƣƮƤ respicit ƞƘȵƢƘƜ Ʀȶ ƢȱƢƞʪ ita reformavit Ƈ: ǢƦơƜ Ʀʭ ƩƣƜƥƛƐƟƦƜ ƢƐƢƞʪ

167

sch. 656b – sch. 673

663 μȲ ƢƘƣƔƜƦȱƣƫ : ȏƢȰƣ ƦȲƟ ƥƧμƨȱƣơƧƥƔƟ ƩƣƘȵƔƟ ƝƔȴ ƢƞƘȵƫ Ʀơʝ ƗȱơƟƦơƤ. L 1 ƢƞƘƒƫ] ƢƞƐơƟ Brunck1: ƢƐƣƔ Kruytbosch 48

668 ơȎ Ɨȳ ƦƜ ƦʬƟ ƥʬƟ ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ : ƦơʝƦơ ƝƔƦŪ ǎƣȻƦƚƥƜƟŭ ơȎƩ ǓƟƘƝƔ ȥƟ ƾƢȱƥƦƔƞƝƔƤ ƗȻƣƫƟ Ʀʭ ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ ƾƛƧμƘʎƤũ L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. v. 668 ơȎ Ɨȳ ƦƜ – ƗƫƣƚμƏƦƫƟ T ơȎƩ] μȲ T 2 ƗȻƣƫƟ] ƗƫƣƚμƏƦƫƟ T

ƦơʝƦơ ƝƔƦŪ ǎƣȻƦƚƥƜƟ om.

669 μȯƞƜƥƦȯ ƖŪ ȣƥƦƘ μȳ : ƟƔȵ, ƨƚƥȵ, ƢƘƣȴ ƦơȹƦơƧ ƨơƕơʝμƔƜ ơȓƦƫƤ, ȣƥƦƘ μƚƗȱƢơƦƘ ƢƔƣƔƜƟȱƥƔƜ ƦƜƟȴ ƾƗȳƞơƧ ƢƣȯƖμƔƦơƤ ƢƣơƛƧμȵƔƟ ƞƔƕƘʎƟ, ȃ ǎƥƦƜƟ ƾƗȳƞʪ ƢƣȯƖμƔƦƜ ǎƢƜƩƘƜƣƘʎƟ. L T 1 lm. deest in Ƈ; accuratiss. vv. 669–70 μƏƞƜƥƦƔ – ƞƔƕƘʎƟ (commentatorem ǒƣƖơƧ ƖŪ ƾƗƑƞơƧ (670) legisse e ƾƗƑƞơƧ ƢƣƏƖμƔƦơƤ et ƾƗƑƞʪ ƢƣƏƖμƔƦƜ coni. Blaydes 147) ƟƔƒ] ƝƔȴ Ƈ ȣƥƦƘ] ȟƤ Ƈ

671 ƘǮ ƗƜƗƔƝƦƮƟ, [ǎƠ ȃƦơƧ ƨơƕʁ]: ƘǮ μȲ ƾƢȷƣƣƚƦơƟ ƘDzƚ. L 1 lm. L decurtavi ƗƜƗƔƝƦȶƟ] ƗƜ ex μƚ in L

673 ƛƔʝμƔ ƾƟƐƞƢƜƥƦơƟ ƢƔƛƘʎƟ : ƛƔƧμƔƥƦȶƟ ƝƔȴ ơǵơƟ ơȎƝ ǂƟ ƦƜƤ ǎƞƢȵƙơƜ ƢƔƛƘʎƟŭ ƖƣȯƨƘƦƔƜ ƗȰ ƝƔȴ μƔƛƘʎƟ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. scripsi: ƖƧƟƔʎƝƘƤ, ȏμʎƟ, ƛƔʝμƔ L: deest in Ƈ 2 ǎƞƢƒƙơƜ] ǎƞƢƒƥơƜ Ƈ – fin. om. Ƈ (ƢƔƛƘʎƟ apud poetam praebet Ƈ) Ɩƣ. L

ƖƣȯƨƘƦƔƜ

168

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

678a ƝƔƦŪ ǂƝƣƔƤ ƥƢƜƞȯƗơƤ : ƥƢƜƞȯƤ ǟ ƢȱƦƣƔ. ȟƤ ơȔƟ ǎƢȴ ƞȵƛơƧ ƛƘμȱƟƚ ƔȎƦȶ ƦơʝƦȷ ƨƚƥƜŭ ƝƔƦƔƦȳƝƘƦƔƜ ơȔƟ ƝƔȴ ʜƘʎ ƝƔȴ ƗƜƔƞȹƘƦƔƜ ƾƢȶ Ʀơʝ ƞȵƛơƧ ƗƜƔƣƣȱơƟ. L T 1 ƥƢƜƞȯƤ ǟ ƢƐƦƣƔ: sch. Ap. Rh. 258, 17 ƥƢƜƞƏƗƔƤ ǢƦơƜ… ƾƞƞƔƩơʝ ƗȰ ƦȮƤ ƢƐƦƣƔƤ; ibid. 292, 24–5 ƥƢƜƞƏƗƘƤ ƗȰ Ɣǯ ƢƐƦƣƔƜ; sch. Opp. Hal. 2.307 ƥƢƜƞƏƤŭ ƢƐƦƣƔ; ibid. 5.595; Hesych. ƥ 1439 ƥƢƘƜƞƏƤ (rectius ƥƢƜƞƏƤ, ut vidit Musurus)ŭ ƢƐƦƣƔ[Ƥ]; ibid. ƥ 1515 … ƥƢƜƞƏƗƘƤ ƖȮƣ ƢƐƦƣƔƜ 1 lm. deest in T; pars ƝƔƦƔƦƑƝƘƦƔƜ (2) – fin. ad lm. latius, v. 678 ƝƔȴ ƪʁ – ƥƢƜƞȯƗơƤ pertinet

678b ȟƤ ƗŪ ƘǮƗʁƤ ǃƢƔƟ : ȃƢƫƤ ƖƟʭƤ ƾƝƣƜƕʬƤ ȃƞơƟ Ʀȶ ƢƣɱƖμƔ, ƘǮƤ μʀƝơƤ ƿƢƞȻƥƫ ƦȶƟ ƞȷƖơƟ. L; cf. gll. in Ts.l. 1 lm. accuratiss. 678–9 ȟƤ ƗŪ ƘǮƗʁƤ – ƞƮƖơƟ ȃƢƫƤ – ƢƣɱƖμƔ] dzƟƔ ƖƟʭƤ Ʀȶ ƢƣɱƖμƔ gl. ad ȟƤ ƗŪ ƘǮƗʁƤ ǃƢƔƟ nec plura T 1–2 ƘǮƤ μʀƝơƤ – fin.] ƦơƧƦƐƥƦƜƟ ƘǮƤ μʀƝơƤ ƿƢƞȻƥƫ ƦȶƟ ƞȷƖơƟ gl. ad μƘƒƙơƟŪ ǎƝƦƘƟʬ ƞƮƖơƟ nec plura T

680a ǎƖȺ ƖȮƣ ȥƟ ǿ ƛȳƣ μƘ : ȥƟ ƘǴƢȱƟ μơƜ ǿ ƁȱƥƥơƤ ȃƦƘ ƦȲƟ ƢƞƘƧƣȮƟ ǢƞƖƘƜ Ʀʭ ƕȱƞƘƜ ƦƣƫƛƘȵƤ. ƖƞƫƩʎƟƜ ƗȰ ƾƢȶ μȱƣơƧƤ Ʀʭ ƕȱƞƘƜŭ ƖƞƫƩȵƟ ƖȮƣ ǟ ƾƝƒƤ, ȁ ƞȱƖƘƜ ȋμƚƣơƤ ȂƖƝơƟ. L T 2–3 ƖƞƫƩƒƟ – fin.: ƖƞƫƩƒƟ ab ȂƖƝơƤ distinguit Poll. Ž 137 ƝƔȴ ƦʀƤ ƾƝȵƗơƤ ȂƖƝơƜ μȰƟ Ɣǯ ƢƣȶƤ Ʀʭ ƝƔƞȯμʪ, ƖƞƫƩʎƟƘƤ ƗȰ Ɣǯ ƢƣȶƤ Ʀʁ ƾƝμʁ ƢƣơƕơƞƔȵ. ǟ ƾƝƒƤ: cf. sch. Opp. Hal. 3.286 ƖƞƫƩʎƟƘƤŭ ƾƖƖƒƗƘƤ (scribendum ƾƝƒƗƘƤ)…; Hesych Ɩ 698 ƖƞƫƩʎƟƔ· ...ƝƧƣȵƫƤ ƗȰ ƖƞƫƩʎƟƘƤ Ɣǯ ƦʬƟ ƾƝȵƗƫƟ ǎƠơƩƔȴ … 3 ȋμƚƣơƤ: Il. 4.151, 4.214 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 680–1 ǎƖȺ ƖȮƣ – ƢƣơȎƗƜƗƏƠƔƦơ

680b (ƢơƟʬƟ): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƾƞƖʬƟ. Ls.l. Ts.l. aliter Amm. 407 ƢơƟƘʎƟ ƝƔȴ ƾƞƖƘʎƟ ƗƜƔƨƐƣƘƜ. ƢơƟƘʎƟ μȰƟ ƖƏƣ ǎƥƦƜ Ʀȶ ǎƟƘƣƖƘʎƟ, ƾƞƖƘʎƟ ƗȰ Ʀȶ ǾƗƧƟɱƥƛƔƜ unde Su. Ɣ 1094 1 lm. add. Elmsley ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ om. T

169

sch. 678a – sch. 685–6

682a (ƢƔƣʀƝƔ): ƞƘȵƢƘƜ ǂƢƣƔƝƦơƟ. L; cf. gl. in Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley ǂƢƣƔƝƦơƟ gl. ad ơȎƗȰƟ nec plura T

682b ƾƞƞŪ ǎƥʪƙȷμƚƟ : ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǒƥƫƥƔ ƝƔȴ ǎƨȹƞƔƠƔŭ ƗƜƘƨȹƞƔƠƔ ơȔƟ ȃƥƔ μơƜ ƢƔƣȳƖƖƘƜƞƘƟ ȟƥƔƟƘȴ ƗȱƞƦʪ ƩƔƞƝʁ ǒƩơƧƥƔ ǎƖƝƘƩƔƣƔƖμȱƟƔ. L T 1 ǒƥƫƥƔ: medium ƥʫƙƘƥƛƔƜ per activum ƥʫƙƘƜƟ explanatur in sch. El. 993 1 (lm.) ǎƥƫƙƮμƚƟ, sine iota subscripto, codd.; pars ƗƜƘƨƯƞƔƠƔ – fin. ad lm. latius 680– 3 ǎƖư – ƖƣƔƨƑƟ spectat ƗƜƘƨƯƞƔƠƔ ơȔƟ om. T, inciso post ǎƨƯƞƔƠƔ sublato 2 ƗƐƞƦʪ] ǎƟ Ɨ. T ǒƩơƧƥƔ] ƦƔʝƦƔ ǒƩ. T

683 ƗȹƥƟƜƢƦơƟ [ƗȰ] ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƗƧƥƔƢȯƞƘƜƢƦơƟ. L 1 haec a sch. 682b separavi ƗȰ delevi

684a1 ƢƣȷƣƣƚƦƔ : ƢƣȶƤ ǎμȰ ȏƢȶ ƁȱƥƥơƧ ƢƣơƘƜƣƚμȱƟƔ. L T 1 ƢƣơƘƜƣƚμȱƟƔ ante ƢƣȶƤ transp. T ǎμȰ] μƘ T

684a2 (ƢƣƮƣƣƚƦƔ): ƢƣơμƘμƘƞƘƦƚμȱƟƔ μơƜ Ǡ ƾƢȷƣƣƚƦƔ. L T 1 haec cum sch. pr. coniuncta (Ǡ T: om. L) separatim collocavit

lm. addidi Ǡ] ƝƔȴ T

685–6 (ǂƢƧƣơƟ – ǂƛƜƝƦơƟ): ƾƢƣơƥƢȱƞƔƥƦơƟ ƢƧƣȶƤ ƝƔȴ ǟƞƜƔƝʀƤ ƾƝƦʎƟơƤ. L T 1 ƾƢƣơƥƢƐƞƔƥƦơƟ: cf. sch. OT 898 ubi ǂƛƜƝƦơƟ per ƾƢƣơƥƢƐƞƔƥƦơƟ illustratur 1 lm. addidi: deest in T, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 684a2 coniungat (Ʀȶ ƗȰ ƛƘƣμʀƤ ǂƛƜƝƦơƟ ƾƝƦʎƟơƤ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ) T

170

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

687 (ƾƣƦȵƩƣƜƥƦơƟ): ƢƔƣƔƧƦȮ ƩƣƜȷμƘƟơƟ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris ƢƔƣŪ ƔȎƦơʝ ƩƣƜƥƛȰƟ T

688 ƟʝƟ ƗŪ, ȃƦŪ ǤƟ ǎƣƖƔƥƦȱơƟ : ƟʝƟ ƗƐ, ȃƦƘ ǎƟȱƥƦƚ ǿ ƝƔƜƣȶƤ Ʀơʝ ƩƣʎƥƔƜ, ǒƩƣƜƥƔ μƔƞƞʭ ǎƣȵơƧ. L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. 688–90 ƟʝƟ – μƔƞƞʭ ƗȰ] ƨƚƥȴƟ T ǎƟƐƥƦƚ] ǎƢȱƥƦƚ Papageorgiou, sed cf. sch. Ap. Rh. 266, 12 ǎƟƥƦƏƟƦơƤ Ʀơʝ ƦʀƤ ƾƟƔƜƣƐƥƘƫƤ ƔȎƦʬƟ ƝƔƜƣơʝ etc et LSJ s.v. ǎƟƒƥƦƚμƜ B.III.2. ǿ om. T 2 μƔƞƞʭ Kruytbosch 48 ‘non illa lana, sed ǿ ƢƐƢƞơƤ a Deianira unguitur idque lanae flocco’ et Zielinski 55: μƔƞƞȶƟ codd.

690a (ƥƢƏƥƔƥƔ) ƝƦƚƥȵơƧ ƕơƦơʝ ƞȯƩƟƚƟ : ƾƢȶ ƝƦƚƥȵơƧ ƢƣơƕȯƦơƧ ƦȶƟ μƔƞƞȶƟ ƥƢȯƥƔƥƔŭ ƝƦȳƟƚ ƗȰ ƝƔȴ ƦȮ ƢƣȷƕƔƦƔ ƞȱƖƘƦƔƜ. L T 1 lm. L supplevi: deest in T ƾƢȶ ƝƦƚƥȵơƧ T: ƾƢơƝƦƜƝơƧ L 2 post ƥƢȯƥƔƥƔ add. ǢƖơƧƟ ǎƟ ơDzƝʪ ƦƣƘƨơμƐƟơƧ T ƝƦƑƟƚ – fin. et sch. 690b in unum composuit et ita retractavit T: ƝƦƑƟƚ ƗȰ ƝƔȴ ƕơƦȮ ơȎ μƮƟơƟ ƦǂƞƞƔ ƾƞƞȮ ƝƔȴ ƦȮ ƢƣƮƕƔƦƔ ǒƞƘƖơƟ ƝƦƑƟƚ – fin.] ‘apparet scholiastam explicare voluisse cur adiectivum ƝƦƑƥƜơƤ de ovibus usurpari possit’ Wansink 107

690b (ƕơƦơʝ ): ƕơƦȮ ǒƞƘƖơƟ ƦȮ ƢƣƮƕƔƦƔ. L; cf. sch. retractatum in T 1 haec a sch. 690a separavi praeeunte Dindorf 72 qui annotaverat ‘alius scholiastae

sunt’ de retractatione in T vide ad sch. 690a lm. addidi

691 (ƾƞƔμƢȰƤ ǟƞȵơƧ): μȲ ƝƔƦƔƧƖƔƥƛȱƟ. L 1 lm. add. Lascaris

sch. 687 – sch. 695a

171

692 (Ɲơȵƞʪ ƙƧƖȯƥƦƣʪ): ƘǮƤ ƠƯƞƜƟơƟ ƥơƣƮƟ, ƦơƧƦȱƥƦƜ ƝƜƕƫƦȷƟ. L 1 cf. Paus. att. ƙ 6 ƙȹƖƔƥƦƣơƟ (e. g. Soph. Tr. 692)ŭ ǟ ƝƜƕƫƦȷƤ. ƝƧƣȵƫƤ ƗȰ ǟ ƠƧƞȵƟƚ ƥơƣȶƤ ƢƔƣȮ Ʀȶ ǎƙƧƖʬƥƛƔƜ... = Phot. ƙ 51; Hesych. ƙ 187 ƙȹƖƔƥƦƣơƟŭ ƝƜƕƫƦȷƤ, ƥơƣȷƤ, †ƙƧƖȷƤ (Soph. Trach. 692); Su. ƙ 177 ... ƙȹƖƔƥƦƣơƟ ƖȮƣ ǟ ƠƧƞȵƟƚ ƥơƣȷƤ; Eust. Il. III 541, 12–4 ǒƥƦƜ ƝƔȴ ƥƔƟƗƔƞȵơƧ ƙƧƖȶƤ … ƝƔȴ ƝƜƕƫƦơʝ Ɨȱ, ȟƤ Ɨƚƞơʎ Ʀȶ ƙȹƖƔƥƦƣơƟ, ǟ ƠƧƞȵƟƚ ƥơƣȷƤ, ƢƔƣȮ Ʀȶ ǎƙƧƖʬƥƛƔƜ ơǵơƟ Ɲơȵƞʪ ƙƧƖȯƥƦƣʪ; id. Od. I 307, 31 1 lm. add. Lascaris ƠƯƞƜƟơƟ L: malim ƠƧƞƒƟƚƟ, sed cf. sch. Eur. Alc. 365 … ǎƟ ƦơʎƤ ƔȎƦơʎƤ ƥơƣơʎƤ... ƥơƣȷƟ Lascaris: ƥƫƣȷƟ L

693 (ƨȯƦƜƟ): ƨȯƥμƔ, ƨƔƟƦƔƥȵƔƟ. Ls.l. 1 aliter sch. Ai. 173a et sch. OT 151 ubi ƨƏƦƜƤ per ƨƑμƚ et μƔƟƦƘƒƔ explanatur 1 lm. add. Elmsley ‘abiecto vitioso lemmate scribendum erat ƨƏƥμƔ: ƨƏƟƦƔƥμƔ’ Nauck 433 qui ƨƏƥμƔ pro ƨƏƦƜƟ apud poetam restituerat

694 ǂƨƣƔƥƦơƟ : ƾƨƔƟʀ, ƾƟƘƝƗƜȳƖƚƦơƟ. ƾƠȹμƕƞƚƦơƟ ƗȰ ƾƥƧƟƘȵƝƔƥƦơƟ ƢƣȶƤ Ʀȶ μƔƛƘʎƟ ƾƟƛƣȻƢʪŭ Ǡ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƾƢƔƣȯƕƞƚƦơƟ, ơǵơƟ ơȎƝ ǒƩơƧƥƔƟ ǂƞƞʪ ƢƔƣƔƕƞƚƛʀƟƔƜ ȣƥƦƘ ƢƜƥƦƘʝƥƔƜ ƝƔȴ μƔƛƘʎƟ ƦȶƟ ƾƝơȹơƟƦƔ. L 1 ƾƟƘƝƗƜƑƖƚƦơƟ: cf. sch. 1057a.1 ubi ƾƨƣƏƥƦʪ per ƾƞƐƝƦʪ explanatur; Hesych. Ɣ 8759 ǂƨƣƔƥƦơƟ· …ƾƟƘƝƞȯƞƚƦơƟ, ƾƟƘƝƗƜȳƖƚƦơƟ, ȁ μȲ ƨƣȯƙƘƦƔƜ. ǂƞƘƝƦơƟ (Eur. Hipp. 820) 2 ƾƢƔƣƏƕƞƚƦơƟ: cf. Eust. Od. I 42, 9–10 ǎƢƘȴ ƗȰ ƠƧμƕȯƞƞƘƜƟ ƝƔȴ Ʀȶ ƥƧƖƝƣȵƟƘƜƟ. ƾƝơƞơȹƛƫƤ ǎƠ ƔȎƦơʝ, ƾƠȹμƕƞƚƦơƤ ǿ ƾƥȹƖƝƣƜƦơƤ, ǿ ƝƔȴ ƾƢƔƣȯƕƞƚƦơƤ 1 ƾƨƔƟʀ scripsi: ƾƨƔƟƐƤ L 2 ǒƩơƧƥƔƟ scripsi: ǒƩơƟ L 1–2 vocabula ƾƨƔƟƐƤ et ǒƩơƟ ut ad ƨƏƥμƔ pertinentia (vide ad sch. 693) retineri posse notat Cunningham

695a Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ ƝȯƦƔƖμƔ : Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ ǒƣƜơƟ Ʀơʝ ƢƣơƕȯƦơƧ μƘƦȮ Ʀȶ ƩƣʎƥƔƜ ƦȶƟ ƢȱƢƞơƟ ǒƣƣƜƪƔ ƘǮƤ ƦȷƢơƟ ƝƔƦƔƞƔμƕƔƟȷμƘƟơƟ ȏƢȶ Ʀơʝ ǟƞȵơƧ. ƦȲƟ ƖȮƣ ƔȎƖȲƟ ƾƝƦʎƟƔ ǟƞƜʬƦƜƟ ƘǴƢƘƟ. L T 1 ǒƣƜơƟ: cf. Eust. Od. I 32, 32–3 …ƝƔȴ Ʀȶ ƝƔƦƘƜƣƖƔƥμȱƟơƟ ǒƣƜơƟ, Ʀȶ ƢƔƣȮ ƆơƨơƝƞƘʎ ǎƟ ƇƣƔƩƜƟȵƔƜƤ ƝȯƦƔƖμƔ

172

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

1 lm. accuratiss. 695–7 Ʀȶ ƖƏƣ – ǟƞƜʬƦƜƟ; grammaticum ƢƞƏƝƔ pro ƨƞƮƖƔ legisse e voce ƦƮƢơƟ (2) coni. Wolff 54 Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ ǒƣƜơƟ] Ʀȶ ǒƣƜơƟ, ƨƚƥƒ T 2 ƘǮƤ T: ȏƢȶ L ƝƔƦƔƞƔμƕƔƟȷμƘƟơƟ] ƕƔƞƞƮμƘƟơƟ ƝƔȴ ƢƧƣơƯμƘƟơƟ T: ƝƔƦƔƞƔμƢƮμƘƟơƟ Brunck1 et Blaydes 153

695b (ƝȯƦƔƖμƔ): Ʀȶ ƔDzƖƘƜơƟ μȳƣƧμƔ. L 1 μƑƣƧμƔ: cf. Moer. μ 20 ƝƏƦƔƖμƔ džƦƦƜƝơƒ, μƑƣƧμƔ ǛƞƞƚƟƘƤ; Tim. Ɲ 5 ƝƏƦƔƖμƔŭ ǎƣȵơƧ ƥƢȯƥμƔ (ǯƘƣȶƟ ƢƞƏƥμƔ cod.) ƝƔȴ μȳƣƧμƔ; Poll. VII 29 ƝƔƦȯƖƘƜƟ, ƝȯƦƔƖμƔ· Ʀȶ ƗŪ ƔȎƦȶ ƝƔȴ μȳƣƧμƔ; Hesych. Ɲ 1035 ƝƔƦȯƖμƔƦƔ· μƚƣȹμƔƦƔ ǎƣȵơƧ Ǡ ƝƔƦƔƥƢȯƥμƔƦƔ; Ɔ Ɲ 97 ƝȯƦƔƖμƔŭ ƝƔƦȯƥƢƔƥμƔ Ǡ μȳƣƧμƔ = Phot. Ɲ 235; Su. Ɲ 505 žȯƦƔƖμƔ: ǎƣȵơƧ ƝƔƦȯƥƢƔƥμƔ, Ǡ μȳƣƧμƔ; sch. Ar. Lys. 583 ƝƔƦȯƖμƔƦƔ: ƦȮ ƦʬƟ ǎƣȵƫƟ ƝƔƦƔƥƢȯƥμƔƦƔ ơȓƦƫ ǎƝȯƞơƧƟ 1 lm. add. Elmsley; (ƝƏƦƔƖμƔ s.) L: sch. ad ƔǮƖƮƤ pro ơǮƮƤ spectare coni. Wolff 54 Ʀȶ ǒƣƜơƟ μƑƣƧμƔ sic textum refinxit Nauck 433 ƔDzƖƘƜơƟ] ǂƣƟƘƜơƟ Kruytbosch 49

697 ȟƤ ƗŪ ǎƛȯƞƢƘƦơ : ȟƤ ƗȰ ǎƛƘƣμȯƟƛƚ, ȏƢȱƣƣƘƧƥƘƟ ƾƨƔƟʬƤ, ƞȱƞƧƦƔƜ. L 1 ǎƛƘƣμƏƟƛƚ: cf. Żesych. ƛ 59 ƛƏƞƢƫŭ ƛƘƣμƔƒƟƫ…; ibid. Ƙ 625 1 lm. accuratiss. 697–8 ȟƤ – ƝƔƦƐƪƚƝƦƔƜ

post ƾƨƔƟʬƤ add. ƝƔȴ Papageorgiou

699 μơƣƨʁ μȯƞƜƥƦŪ ƘǮƝƔƥƦȷƟ : ǎơƜƝȶƤ ƢƣȵƥμƔƦƜ ƠȹƞơƧŭ ƛƔƧμƔƥƦʬƤ ƗȰ ƕƣȻμƔƦƔ ƢƣƒơƟơƤ ƘǴƢƘƟ Ʀȶ ƢƣȵƥμƔ. ƦƣȷƢơƟ Ɩȯƣ ƦƜƟƔ ǎƥƛȵƫƟ Ʀȶ ƠȹƞơƟ ǿ ƢƣƒƫƟ ǎƝƘʎƟơ Ʀȶ ƞƘƢƦȶƟ ƾƢơƕȯƞƞƘƜ. L T; cf. etiam gl. in Ts.l. 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. 699–700 μơƣƨʁ – ƠƯƞơƧ ǎơƜƝȶƤ ƢƣȵƥμƔƦƜ ƠȹƞơƧ om. T in margine sed ut gl. ad ƘǮƝƔƥƦƮƟ praebuit ƢƣȵƥμƔƦƜ Lascaris: ƢƣƒƥμƔƦơƤ L: ƢƣƒƥμƔƦ T ƗȰ om. T 2 ƢƣƒơƟơƤ, ut apud poetam: ƢƣƜȷƟơƤ Dindorf 72, at cf. Hdn. ƝƔƛ. Ƣƣơƥ. I 20, 13 (= [Arc.] 18, 3) Ʀȶ (alt.) Lp.c.: ƦȮ ƠƯ La.c. (fieri potest, ut scholiasta ƦȮ ƠƯƥμƔƦƔ voluerit) 3 ƢƣƒƫƟ] ƢƣƜȺƟ Dindorf l.c., sed vide 2 ƾƢơƕȯƞƞƘƜ] ƾƢơƢƐμƢƘƜ T

sch. 695a – sch. 708

173

701 (ƢƣơƢƘƦƐƤ): ǎƣƣƜμμȱƟơƟ ƝƔȴ ƢƣơƢƘƥȶƟ ƩƔμƔȵ. L Ts.l. 1 ƢƣơƢƘƥƮƟ: cf. sch. 976b; Erot. Ƣ 1 ƢƣơƢƘƦƑƤ: ƢƣơƢƒƢƦƫƟ… 1 lm. add. Lascaris ƢƣơƢƘƥȶƟ ƩƔμƔƒ] ƩƔμƔȴ ƢƘƥȶƟ T

702a (ƾƟƔƙȱơƧƥƜ): ƾƟƔƝƔƩƞȯƙơƧƥƜ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris, nisi quod pro ƾƟƔƙƐơƧƥƜ scripsit ƾƟƔƙƐơƧƥƜƟ

702b ƛƣơμƕȻƗƘƜƤ ƾƨƣơȵ : ǎƢƚƣμȱƟơƜŭ ƛƣȷμƕơƤ ƖȮƣ ǿ ȂƖƝơƤ. Ǡ ƢƘƣƜƨƘƣʀ ƨƧƥȳμƔƦƔ. L; cf.etiam gl. in Ts.l. 1 ǎƢƚƣμȱƟơƜ – fin.] ƢƘƣƜƨƘƣʀ ƨƧƥȳμƔƦƔ gl. ad ƛƣơμƕȻƗƘƜƤ ƾƨƣơȵ nec plura Ƈ

703a1 ƖƞƔƧƝʀƤ ǾƢưƣƔƤ : Ʀơʝ ƖƞƘȹƝơƧƤ Ʀơʝ ƾƣƦȵƫƤ ǎƝƢƜƔƥƛȱƟƦơƤ ƝƔȴ ƟȱơƧ. μȯƞƜƥƦƔ ƗȰ ǿ ƟȱơƤ ơǴƟơƤ ƛƘƣμȶƤ ȢƟ, ƘǮ ƢȱƥơƜ ƩƔμƔƒ, ƾƨƣȵƙƘƜ. L T 1 lm. ex LƇ: ƢơƦơʝ UY: deest in A; accuratiss. v. 703 ƖƞƔƧƝʀƤ – ƢơƦơʝ ǎƝƢƜƔƥƛȱƟƦơƤ L (forma ex huius aetatis Graecitate; cf LSJ s.v. ƢƜƐƙƫ): ǎƝƢƜƘƥƛȱƟƦơƤ Ƈ (Lascaris) 2 ƗȰ] ƖȮƣ Ƈ

703a2 ƖƞƔƧƝȲƟ ǾƢȻƣƔƟ ƦȶƟ ƟȱơƟ ơǴƟơƟ ƘǴƢƘƟ ƗƜȮ ƦȲƟ ƞƔμƢƣȷƦƚƦƔ. L T 1–2 haec a sch. pr. separavi ƘǴƢƘƟ] ƞƐƖƘƜ T

1 ƖƞƔƧƝȲƟ scripsi: ƖƞƔƧƝȲƟ ƗȰ L: ƖƞƔƧƝȲƟ ơȔƟ T

708 (ǥƤ … ȓƢƘƣ): ȏƨŪ ǥƤ, ƗƜŪ ǣƟ. L 1 lm. add. Lascaris

174

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

709 (ƦȶƟ ƕƔƞȷƟƦŪ ): ƦȶƟ ƦơƠƘȹƥƔƟƦƔ. L 1 lm. add. Lascaris; (ƦȶƟ ƕƔƞƮƟƦŪ s.) L

710 ȥƟ ǎƖȺ μƘƛȹƥƦƘƣơƟ : ȥƟ, ƦʬƟ ƘǮƣƚμȱƟƫƟ μơƜ ȏƢŪ ǎƝƘȵƟơƧ, ƟʝƟ ƦȲƟ ƖƟʬƥƜƟ μƔƟƛȯƟƫ, ȃƦƘ ơȎƝȱƦƜ μƘ ȞƨƘƞƘʎ. L T; cf. etiam gl. in Ts.l. 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 710–1 ȥƟ ǎƖȺ – ǂƣƟƧμƔƜ ȥƟ om. T ƦʬƟ – ǎƝƘƒƟơƧ om. in margine sed ut gl. ad ȥƟ praebuit T ƟʝƟ] ƟʝƟ, ƨƚƥƒ, ƦơƯƦƫƟ T 1–2 ƦȲƟ ƖƟʬƥƜƟ μƔƟƛƏƟƫ] ‘expectamus ƦȲƟ ƖƟʬƥƜƟ ƞƔμƕƏƟƫ’ Nauck 433 2 μƘ om. T

711 ƾƣƝƘʎ : ȞƨƘƞƘʎŭ ȋμƚƣơƤ ǂƣƝƜơƟ ǎƥƥƘʎƦƔƜ. L Ts.l. 1 ȞƨƘƞƘʎ: sch. D Hom. Il. 20.289 ǢƣƝƘƥƘƟ: ǎƕơƑƛƚƥƘƟ, ȞƨƐƞƚƥƘƟ 393

ȋμƚƣơƤ: Il. 2.

1 lm. deest in Ƈ

712 ƘDz ƦƜ μȲ ƪƘƧƥƛȳƥơμƔƜ : ƘǮ μȲ ƗƜƔμȯƣƦơƜμƜ ƦʀƤ ƖƟȻμƚƤ ǡƟ ǒƩơƧƥƔ ƢƘƣȴ ƔȎƦơʝ ƦƧƖƩȯƟƫ. L; cf. gl. in Ts.l. 1 lm. accuratiss. vv. 712–3 ƘDz ƦƜ μȲ – ƖƟưμƚƤ ƪƘƧƥƛƑƥơμƔƜ nec plura T

ƘǮ μȲ – fin.] ƗƜƔμȯƣƦơƜμƜ gl. ad

715 ƩȢƥƔƢƘƣ ǀƟ ƛȵƖɾ : ƝƔȴ ȃƥƔ ǀƟ ƛȵƖɾ Ʀơʝ ǧƣƔƝƞƘȵơƧ ƕȱƞơƧƤ, ƘDzƦƘ ǂƟƛƣƫƢơƤ ƘDzƦƘ ƛƚƣȵơƟ, ƾƢȷƞƞƧƦƔƜ. L T 1 lm. scripsit Brunck2: ƩȣƥƢƘƣ (sic ut apud poetam) ǀƟ ƛƒƖɾ L: deest in T; accuratiss. 715–6 ƩȢƥƔƢƘƣ – ƝƟưƗƔƞŪ ƝƔȴ om. T ȃƥƔ] ȃƥƔƢƘƣ T, quippe qui ƩȣƥƔƢƘƣ (spiritu aspero) apud poetam praebeat ǀƟ ƛƒƖɾ] ƨƚƥƒ, ƛƒƖɾ T

175

sch. 709 – sch. 723

716 (ǎƝ ƗȰ ƦơʝƗƘ): ǎƝ Ʀơʝ ƁȱƥƥơƧŭ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƗƜȮ ƁȱƥƥơƧ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris ǎƝ om. Ƈ

719 ƝƔȵƦơƜ ƗȱƗơƝƦƔƜ : ƝƾƖȻ, ƨƚƥȵƟ, ƾƢơƛƔƟƘʎƟ ƕơƧƞȳƥơμƔƜ, dzƟƔ μȲ ƗȷƠƫ ƢơƟƚƣȵɯ ƾƟɾƣƚƝȱƟƔƜ ƦȶƟ ǧƣƔƝƞȱƔ ƾƞƞŪ ƾƝơƧƥȵʪ ƖƟȻμɾ. L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 719–22 ƝƔȵƦơƜ ƗȱƗơƝƦƔƜ – ƢƘƨƧƝƐƟƔƜ ƕơƯƞơμƔƜ T 2 ƾƝơƧƥȵʪ] ơȎƝ ƾƝ. T

ƕơƧƞȳƥơμƔƜ]

720 ƦƔȹƦɾ ƥȸƟ ǾƣƖʁ : ƦơȹƦʪ Ʀʭ ƦƣȷƢʪ, ƦơƧƦȱƥƦƜ ƗƜȮ Ʀơʝ ƢȱƢƞơƧ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. deest in T; commentatorem incisum non post ƥƨƔƞƑƥƘƦƔƜ, sed post ǾƣƖʁ posuisse vidit Wunder3 52

721 ƙʀƟ ƖȮƣ ƝƔƝʬƤ ƝƞȹơƧƥƔƟ : ƖƧƟƔʎƝƔ ƝƔƝơƗơƠơʝƥƔƟ ơȎ ƗƘʎ ƙʀƟ, ǣƦƜƤ μȲ ƛȱƞƘƜ ƗơƝƘʎƟ ǎƝ ƨȹƥƘƫƤ ƘǴƟƔƜ ƝƔƝȳ. L T 1 lm. deest in T, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 719 coniungat (ƖƧƟƔʎƝƔ ƖȮƣ); accuratiss. vv. 721–2 ƙʀƟ ƖȮƣ – ƢƘƨƧƝƐƟƔƜ

723 ƦƔƣƕƘʎƟ μȰƟ ǒƣƖƔ : ƾƟȯƖƝƚ μȰƟ ƘȎƞƔƕƘʎƥƛƔƜ ƦȮ ƗƘƜƟȮ ǒƣƖƔ, ơȎ ƩƣȲ ƗȰ Ƣƣȶ ƦʀƤ ǎƝƕȯƥƘƫƤ ƝƔȴ ƦʬƟ ƥƧμƕƚƥơμȱƟƫƟ ƔǯƣƘʎƥƛƔƜ ƦȮ ƗƘƜƟȯ. L T 1 ƘȎƞƔƕƘʎƥƛƔƜ: sch. D Hom. Il. 4.388 ƦƏƣƕƘƜ: … ƚȎƞƔƕƘʎƦơ; Hesych. Ʀ 172 ƦƔƣƕƑƥƔƟƦƘ[Ƥ]ŭ… ƘȎƞƔƕƚƛƐƟƦƘƤ (A 331); ibid. Ʀ 184 ƦƏƣƕƚƥƔƟŭ ƚȎƞƔƕƑƛƚƥƔƟ (O 280) 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 723–4 ƦƔƣƕƘʎƟ – ƢƏƣơƤ post μȰƟ add. ƨƚƥȴƟ T 2 Ƣƣȶ ƦʀƤ ǎƝƕƏƥƘƫƤ ƝƔȴ ƦʬƟ ƥƧμƕƚƥơμƐƟƫƟ] Ƣƣȶ ƦʀƤ ǎƝƕƏƥƘƫƤ ƦʬƟ ƖƘƟƚƥơμƐƟƫƟ T: ƝƔȴ Ƣƣȶ ƦʀƤ ǎƝƕƏƥƘƫƤ ƦʬƟ ƥƧμƕƚƥơμƐƟƫƟ Papageorgiou renuente Wansink 107

176

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

725 ơȎƝ ǒƥƦƜƟ ǎƟ ƦơʎƤ μȲ ƝƔƞơʎƤ : ǎƟ ƦơʎƤ ƢơƟƚƣơʎƤ ƕơƧƞƘȹμƔƥƜƟ ơȎƗȰ ȏƢơƞƘȵƢƘƦƔƜ ƩƣƚƥƦȲ ǎƞƢȴƤ ǣƦƜƤ ƢƔƣȱƩƘƜ ƢƘƢơȵƛƚƥƜƟ ƝƔȴ ƛȯƣƥơƤ. ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƗȹƥƘƞƢȵƤ ƘǮμƜ. L T 2 ƢƘƢơƒƛƚƥƜƟ: sch. D Hom. Il. 5.2 ƛƏƣƥơƤ: … ƢƘƢơƒƛƚƥƜƤ 1 lm. sic Lp: post μȲ spatium vacuum quattor litt. in L: deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 725–6 ơȎƝ ǒƥƦƜƟ – ƢƣơƠƘƟƘʎ post ƢơƟƚƣơʎƤ add. ƨƚƥȴ T ơȎƗȰ] ƗȰ serius additum in L: ơȎƩ Lp 2 ƛƏƣƥơƤ] ƛƏƣƣơƤ T 2–3 ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ L: ƦơƧƦƐƥƦƜ T

727 ƾƞƞŪ ƾμƨȴ ƦơʎƤ ƥƨƔƞƘʎƥƜ μȲ ŪƠ ǏƝơƧƥȵƔƤ : ƦơʎƤ ƾƝơƧƥȵƫƤ ƥƨƔƞƘʎƥƜƟ ǟ ǎƢƔƖơμȱƟƚ ǾƣƖȲ ƢƘƢƘμμȱƟƚ ǎƥƦȴ ƝƔȴ ƢƣƔƘʎƔ ƝƔȴ ƥƧƖƖƟƫƥƦƑ, ǥƤ ƥƘ ƗȵƝƔƜơƟ ƦƧƖƩȯƟƘƜƟ ƢƔƣȮ Ʀơʝ ǧƣƔƝƞȱơƧƤŭ ǂƝơƧƥƔ ƖȮƣ ǣμƔƣƦƘƤ. L T; cf. etiam gl. in Ts.l. 1 lm. sic L, nisi quod ǏƝơƧƥƒƔƤ per compendium reddit: deest in T, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 725 copulet (ƢƣȶƤ ȁ ǎƢƏƖƘƜ); accuratiss. vv. 727–8 ƾƞƞŪ ƾμƨȴ – ƢƣƐƢƘƜ ƦơʎƤ – ƥƨƔƞƘʎƥƜƟ om. T in margine, sed praebuit ut gl. ad ƦơʎƤ ƥƨƔƞƘʎƥƜƟ 2 ƝƔȴ ƥƧƖƖƟƫƥƦȲ post ǣμƔƣƦƘƤ (3) transp. Zielinski 55

729–30 (ƦơƜƔʝƦƔ – ƕƔƣƯ ): ǿ μȲ ƗƧƥƦƧƩʬƟ ƦơƜƔʝƦƔ ǀƟ ƘDzƢơƜ. L 1 lm. addidi

731a ƥƜƖɱƟ ǀƟ ƿƣμȷƙơƜ : ƢƣȱƢƘƜ ƥơƜ ƞơƜƢȶƟ ƥƜƫƢɱƟ ƝƔȴ μƚƝȱƦƜ ƢƘƣȴ ƦơȹƦƫƟ ƢƞƘȵƫ ƞȱƖƘƜƟ, ƘǮ μȲ ǂƣƔ ƦƜ Ʀʭ ƥʭ ƢƔƜƗȴ μȱƞƞƘƜƤ ǎƣƘʎƟ ƢƔƣƔƖƜƟơμȱƟʪ. L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 731–3 ƥƜƖɱƟ – ƢƏƣƘƥƦƜ ƞơƜƢȶƟ om. T 3 post ƢƔƣƔƖƜƟơμȱƟʪ add. ǢƗƚ T

731b (ƩƣȷƟơƟ): ƖƣȯƨƘƦƔƜ ƞȷƖơƟ. Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley Ɩƣ. L

post ƥơƜ add. ƨƚƥƒ T

sch. 725 – sch. 745

177

736 (ǂƞƞơƧ ƝƘƝƞʀƥƛƔƜ μƚƦȱƣŪ ): ƔǮƥƩȹƟơμƔƜ ƖȮƣ ǎƢȴ ƥơȵ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 sch. ad v. 734 spectans in codd. ad hunc v. rettulit Lascaris lm. add. Elmsley

737 (ƢơƛƐƟ): ǎƝ ƛƘơʝ ƦƜƟơƤ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

738 (ƥƦƧƖơȹμƘƟơƟ): ƞƧƢƚƣȶƟ ƝƔȴ μȵƥơƧƤ ǂƠƜơƟ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris

742–3 Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ | ƨƔƟƛȱƟ : Ʀȶ ǃƢƔƠ ƢƣƔƩƛȰƟ ƝƔȴ ǎƢȴ ƢȱƣƔƤ ǎƞƛȶƟ ƢʬƤ ǂƟ ƦƜƤ μȲ ƖƘƟȱƥƛƔƜ ƢơƜȳƥƘƜƘƟũ ƄȵƟƗƔƣơƤ

5

ƦʬƟ ƗȰ ƢƘƢƣƔƖμȱƟƫƟ ƾƢơȵƚƦơƟ ơȎƗŪ ǀƟ ƩƣȷƟơƤ ǿ ƢȯƟƦƫƟ ƢƔƦȲƣ ƗȹƟƔƜƦơ ƛȱμƘƟ ǒƣƖƫƟ ƦȱƞơƤ. L T 2 ƄƒƟƗƔƣơƤ: Pi. Olymp. 2. 15–17 ...ƦʬƟ ƗȰ ƢƘƢƣƔƖμȱƟƫƟ | ǎƟ ƗȵƝɯ ƦƘ ƝƔȴ ƢƔƣȮ ƗȵƝƔƟ ƾƢơȵƚƦơƟ ơȎƗŪ ǀƟ | ƩƣȷƟơƤ ǿ ƢȯƟƦƫƟ ƢƔƦȲƣ ƗȹƟƔƜƦơ ƛȱμƘƟ ǒƣƖƫƟ ƦȱƞơƤ 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 742–3 Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ – ƢơƘʎƟ ǎƢȴ] ƘǮƤ T 2 ƖƘƟƐƥƛƔƜ] ƖƘƟƑƥƘƥƛƔƜ T ƢơƜȳƥƘƜƘƟ] ƢơƜƑƥɾ T ƄƒƟƗƔƣơƤ] ƝƔȴ Ƅ. T 3 ƗȰ om. T 4 ơȎƗŪ ǀƟ] ơȎƗȰƟ T 5 ƛȱμƘƟ T Lp (Lascaris): ƛƐμƘƟƔƜ L

745 ǂƙƚƞơƟ : ƨƔʝƞơƟ, ȁ ơȎƗƘȴƤ ƙƚƞȻƥƘƜƘƟ. L Ts.l. 1 cf. sch. 284; Su. Ɣ 590 NJƙƚƞơƟ: ȁ ơȎƝ ǂƟ ƦƜƤ ƙƚƞȻƥƘƜ (sic). ǂƙƚƞơƟ ơȓƦƫƤ ǒƣƖơƟ ǎƣƖȯƥƛƔƜ μƘ ƨɿƤ… 1 lm. deest in T ƙƚƞȻƥƘƜƘƟ] ǎƙƑƞƫƥƘƟ T; vide ad sch. 322.2 ƢƣơƝơμƒƥƘƜƘƟ

178

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

746 ƔȎƦȶƤ ƕƔƣƘʎƔƟ ƠƧμƨơƣȯƟ : ƦȮ μȰƟ ǏȻƣƔƝƔ ƢȯƥƩơƟƦơƤ, ƦȮ ƗȰ ƾƟơƜμȻƙơƟƦơƤ ǢƝơƧƥƔ. L t(TTa) 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 746–7 ƔȎƦȶƤ – ƝƞƯƫƟ post ǏưƣƔƝƔ add. ƨƚƥȴ T

747a (ƢƔƦƣƮƤ): ƢƘƣȴ Ʀơʝ ƢƔƦƣȷƤ. Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

747b ƝƔȴ ƝƔƦȮ ƖƞʬƥƥƔƟ: ƾƟƦȴ ƾƟơƜμȻƠƔƟƦơƤ ƔȎƦơʝ ƝƔƦȮ ƦȲƟ ƖƞʬƥƥƔƟ. L 1 lm.] ƝƔȴ ƝƔƦȮ ƖƞʬƥƥƔƟ ƝƞƯƫƟ L

748 Ƣơʝ ƗŪ ǎμƢƘƞȯƙƘƜƤ : ƢƣơƥƢƘƞȯƙƘƜƤŭ ƢƔƣȵƥƦƔƥƔƜ ƗȰ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƢƞƚƥȵơƟ ƖȱƖơƟƔƤ. L

750–2 (ȃƛŪ ƘǵƣƢƘ…, ƾƝƦƑ ƦƜƤ… ): ƝƔƜƟơƢƣƘƢȲƤ ǟ ƨƣȯƥƜƤ. L T 1 lm. addidi

752–3 (ƾƝƦƑ ƦƜƤ – žƑƟƔƜƮƟ ǎƥƦƜƟ): ǤƞƛƘƟ ƘǮƤ ƦȲƟ ŹȒƕơƜƔƟ ɓ ƾƝƣƫƦȳƣƜȷƟ ǎƥƦƜ Ʀȶ žƑƟƔƜơƟ. L Ts.l. 1 vide ad sch. 750–2 1 lm. addidi ɒ] ǥƤ T (Lascaris) sch. 238c.1 et 993.2

2 žƑƟƔƜơƟ T: žƚƟƔʎơƟ L, etiam apud poetam, at cf.

179

sch. 746 – sch. 764

754 ƦƘμƘƟȵƔƟ ƦƘ ƨƧƞƞȯƗƔ : ƦȶƟ ƾƢȶ ƦʬƟ ƦƘμƘƟʬƟ ƥƦȱƨƔƟơƟŭ Ǡ ƦȱμƘƟơƤ ƢơƞȹƨƧƞƞơƟ. L Ts.l. 1 ƥƦƐƨƔƟơƟ: hoc sensu vocem ƨƧƞƞƏƗƔ accepit scholiasta ad Eur. Or. 383 1 lm. ex Lp (Lascaris): deest in LT ƦƘμƐƟơƧƤ T Ǡ – fin. om. T

ƦȶƟ a T (Lascaris): ƦʬƟ L

ƦʬƟ ƦƘμƘƟʬƟ] Ʀơʝ

757 (ơǮƝƘʎơƤ): ǎƞȱƖƘƦơ ǿ ſȵƩƔƤ ƥȹƟƦƣơƨơƤ ƘǴƟƔƜ țƞƞơƧ. L 1 lm. addidi

759 (ǎƟƗȸƤ – ƢƣơȎƠƘƨƒƘƥơ): ǎƟƗƧƥȯμƘƟơƤ, ȟƤ ƥȸ ǎƟƘƦƘȵƞƫ. L; cf. etiam gl. in Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley ǎƟƗƧƥȯμƘƟơƤ – fin.] ǎƟƗƧƥȯμƘƟơƤ gl. ad ǎƟƗȸƤ nec plura Ƈ

763–4 (ƗƘƒƞƔƜơƤ – ƝƔƦƚƯƩƘƦơ): ǿ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ ǯƞƔƣɲ Ʀʁ ƨƣƘƟȴ ƝƔƦƚȹƠƔƦȷ ƥơƜ ƩƔȵƣƫƟ ǎƢȴ Ʀʭ ƢȱƢƞʪ. L Ts.l 1 ǯƞƔƣɲ: cf. Hesych. Ɯ 518 dzƞƔơƤŭ ǯƞƔƣƮƤ; ibid. Ɯ 521; ibid. Ɯ 523; ibid. Ɯ 535; ibid. Ɯ 538; Phot. Ɯ 106 1 lm. addidi ǿ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ om. T Ʀʁ om. T

764 (ƝƔƦƚȹƩƘƦơ): ƞƘȵƢƘƜ Ʀȶ ƥơƜ. L 1 lm. add. Papageorgiou

ƝƔƦƚȹƠƔƦơ] ƝƔƦƚƯƩƘƦơ T

180

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

765–7 (ȃƢƫƤ ƗȰ – ƩƣƫƦƒ ): ȃƦƘ ƗȰ ƾƢȶ ƦʬƟ ƛƧμȯƦƫƟ ƝƔȴ ƦʬƟ ƠȹƞƫƟ ǟ ƨƞȶƠ ƾƟƘƝƔȵƘƦơ, ƦȷƦƘ ǯƗƣȺƤ ƾƟɿƘƜ ƢƘƣȴ Ʀȶ ƥʬμƔ ƔȎƦơʝ. L T 1 lm. addidi ȃƦƘ ƗȰ] ȃƦƘ, ƨƚƥƒƟ, T ƾƢȶ] ƾƢƮ ƦƘ T

2 ƾƟɿƘƜ T (Lascaris): ƾƟƘƒƚ L

766 ƨƞȶƠ ƔǯμƔƦƚƣȯ : ƔǯμƔƦƚƣȯ ȃƦƜ ǎƝ Ʀơʝ ƔdzμƔƦơƤ ƦʬƟ ǯƘƣƘȵƫƟ ƥƧƟȵƥƦƔƦƔƜŭ ƢƜƘȵƣƔƤ ƗȰ ƗƣƧȷƤ ƞƜƢƔƣơʝ ƠȹƞơƧŭ ƗƣʝƟ ƖȮƣ ƞȱƖƘƜ ƢɱƟ ƗȱƟƗƣơƟ. L T 2 ƞƜƢƔƣơʝ: cf. Apollon. S. 131, 26 ƢƜƘƒƣƚ ƞƜƢƔƣƏ…; sch. D Hom. Il. 1.40 ƢƒơƟƔ: … ƞƜƢƔƣƏ; ibid. 2.403; ibid. 5.512; ibid. 9.207; sch. Theocr. VII 143a ƛƐƣƘơƤ μƏƞƔ ƢƒơƟơƤ: μƘƖƏƞƫƤ ƞƜƢƔƣơʝ …; Hesych. Ɲ 1657 … ƢƒƫƟ ƖȮƣ ǿ ƞƜƢƔƣƮƤ; ibid. Ƣ 2407 ƢƒƫƟŭ ƞƜƢƔƣƏ[Ɵ]; ibid. Ƣ 2329; ibid. Ƣ 2333; Ɔ Ƣ 481 = Phot. 430, 20 = Su. Ƣ 1630 ƗƣʝƟ – fin.: cf. sch. Hom. Il. 11.86a … ƗƣʝƟ ƖȮƣ ǎƝȯƞơƧƟ ơǯ ƢƔƞƔƜơȴ ƾƢȶ Ʀơʝ ƾƣƩƔƜơƦȱƣơƧ ƢɱƟ ƗȱƟƗƣơƟ; sch. Eur. Andr. 167 … džƩƘƞʭơƟ ƗȰ ƢɱƟ ƢơƦȯμƜơƟ ȓƗƫƣ ƨƔƥȴƟ ȟƤ ƗƣʝƟ ƢɱƟ ƗȱƟƗƣơƟ…; sch. Ar. Eq. 675b … ơǯ ƖȮƣ ƾƣƩƔʎơƜ ƢɱƟ ƗƐƟƗƣơƟ ƗƣʝƟ ǎƝƏƞơƧƟ…; Hesych. Ɨ 2438 ƗƣʝƤ· ƢɱƟ ƠȹƞơƟ ƝƔȴ ƗȱƟƗƣơƟ; Ɔ Ɨ 371 ƗƣʝƤŭ ƘǴƗơƤ ƗȱƟƗƣơƧ, ƝƔȴ ƢɱƟ ƗȱƟƗƣơƟ = Phot. Ɨ 772 1 lm. deest in T, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 765–7 coniungat (ƔǯμƔƦƚƣȯ ƗȰ) ǎƝ] ƾƢȶ T 2 ƥƧƟȵƥƦƔƦƔƜ] ƥƧƟƒƥƦƔƦơ T post ƗƣƧȷƤ add. ƦơƧƦƐƥƦƜ T ƞƐƖƘƜ ƢɱƟ] ƢɱƟ ƞƐƖơƧƥƜ T

768 ƾƣƦȵƝơƞƞơƤ ȣƥƦƘ ƦƐƝƦơƟoƤ : ȟƤ ȏƢȶ ƦȱƝƦơƟơƤ ƝƔƞʬƤ ƥƧƖƝƘƝơƞƞƚμȱƟơƤ. Ʀȶ ƗȰ ǏƠʀƤŭ ƝƔȴ ƢƣơƥƝơƞƞƚƦȶƤ ǿ ƩƜƦȺƟ ƝƔƦȮ ƢɱƟ μȱƣơƤ ȟƤ ǀƟ Ơȹƞʪ ƟƘƔƣȮ Ɲȷƞƞƚ ȏƢȶ ƦȱƝƦơƟơƤ ƢƣơƥƘȵƚ ƩƣƜƥƛƘʎƥƔ. L T 1–2 ƝƔƞʬƤ ƥƧƖƝƘƝơƞƞƚμƐƟơƤ: cf. sch. Aesch. Ch. 580a ] ƥȹμƨƫƟƔ ƝƔȴ ȏƖƜʬƤ ƥƧƟƔƣμơƙȷμƘƟƔ ƦƔʎƤ ƟƘƫƥƦȴ ƥƧƟƛȳƝƔƜƤ ǟμʬƟ; Hesych. Ɣ 7507 ƾƣƦȵƝơƞƞƔ· ǟƣμơƥμȱƟƔ 1 lm. scripsit Brunck2: ƢƞƘƧƣƔʎƥƜƟ ƾƣƦƒƝơƞƞơƤ L: deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 768–9 ƢƞƘƧƣƔʎƥƜƟ – ǂƣƛƣơƟ; enarratorem ȣƥƦƘ ƦƐƝƦơƟơƤ | ƠƯƞʪ ƟƘưƣƚƤ ƝƮƞƞƔ ƢƣơƥƩƣƜƥƛƘʎƥŪ ȓƢơ | ƩƜƦȺƟ etc legisse coni. Bergk lix 1 ȟƤ – 2 ƥƧƖƝƘƝơƞƞƚμȱƟơƤ om. T 2 ƗȰ om. T ƝƔȴ om. T 3 ƟƘƔƣȮ ƝƮƞƞƚ Lascaris (contuli Gal. 18b.398.5–7 Kühn ǿƢơʎơƟ Ɩȯƣ ƦƜ ƦơʎƤ ǏƟơƧμȱƟơƜƤ ƠȹƞơƜƤ ǎƥƦȴƟ ǟ Ɲȷƞƞƚ, ƦơƜơʝƦơƟ ƦơʎƤ ƥƧƟƦƣƜƕơμȱƟơƜƤ ǾƥƦơʎƤ ǿ ƢʬƣơƤ): ƟƘƔƣɱ ƝƮƞƞƚ L: ƟƘƔƣȮ ƝƮƞƞƔ T

sch. 765–7 – sch. 775

181

770a ǾƗƔƖμȷƤ : ƝƟƚƥμȷƤŭ ƗƑƠƔƥƛƔƜ ƖȮƣ Ʀȶ ƝƟȳƥƔƥƛƔƜ. ƾƟƦȵƥƢƔƥƦơƤ ƗȰ DzƥơƤ ƥƢƔƥμơʝ Ǡ μƘƦȮ ƥƢƔƥμơʝ. ƖȵƟƘƦƔƜ ƗȰ ƝƟƚƥμȶƤ ƾƢȶ ƥƢƔƥμơʝ. L T 1 ƝƟƚƥμƮƤ – ƝƟƑƥƔƥƛƔƜ: cf. Moer. Ɣ 85 ƾƗƔƖμȷƤ ƾƗȯƠƔƥƛƔƜ džƦƦƜƝơȵ, ƝƟƚƥμȷƤ ƝƟȳƥƔƥƛƔƜ ǛƞƞƚƟƘƤ; Hesych. Ɣ 970 ƾƗƔƖμƮƤŭ ƝƟƚƥμƮƤ (Soph. Tr. 770); Ɔb Ɣ 347 ƾƗƔƖμȷƤ· ǾƗƔƠƚƥμȷƤ, ȃƢƘƣ ǎƥƦȴ ƝƟƚƥμȷƤ. ơȓƦƫƤ ƆơƨơƝƞʀƤ (Tr. 770) = Phot. Ɣ 322 1 lm.] ǾƗƔƖμȶƤ ƾƟƦƒƥƢƔƥƦơƤ L ƗƑƠƔƥƛƔƜ (cunctanter retinui)] ǾƗƏƠƔƥƛƔƜ Bernardakis 61: ǾƗƏƠƘƥƛƔƜ Heath 81: ǾƗƔƠƑƥƔƥƛƔƜ Nauck 433, sed scholiasta ab hoc nomine, i.e. ƗƏƝƟƘƥƛƔƜ, etymon vocis ǾƗƔƖμƮƤ ducit; cf. Gal. 19.70.1 Kühn ƾƗƏƠƔƥƛƔƜ: ƗƏƝƟƘƥƛƔƜ ƝƟƚƥμƫƗʬƤ 2 ƥƢƔƥμơʝ (pr.)] ƥƢƔƥμʭ Lascaris, at DzƥơƤ cum genitivo construitur etiam in e.g. sch. Hom. Il. 3.370 DzƥơƟ ǤƟ ƛƔƟƏƦơƧ Ʀȶ ȏƢƘƝƥƦʀƟƔƜ Ʀơʝ μƘƦƣƚƦơʝ, ibid. 8.163c ƖƧƟƔƜƝȶƤ DzƥơƤ ǤƥƛƔ ƖƒƟƘƦƔƜ – fin. del. Lascaris ƝƟƚƥμȶƤ scripsi: ǿ ƪƮƨơƤ codd. (‘i.e. ƛƏƟƔƦơƤ’ Papageorgiou, sed huius significationis exempla desunt)

770b (ƨơƜƟȵƔƤ): ƇƧƨʬƟơƤ [μȰƟ] ƖȮƣ ƝƔȴ ǖƩȵƗƟƚƤ țƗƣƔ. L T 1 lm. add. Papageorgiou: ǎƩƛƣɱƤ ƗȰ ǎƩƒƗƟƚƤ Ƈ (ƗȰ praebet Ƈ, quippe qui hoc sch. scholio 770a continuet) ƇƧƨʬƟơƤ μȰƟ ƖȮƣ] ǎƢƘȴ ƇƧƨʬƟơƤ Ƈ μȰƟ del. Brunck1 ȓƗƣƔ] ǟ ȓƗ. Ƈ

771 (ǮȶƤ ȟƤ ǎƗƔȵƟƧƦơ): ȟƤ ƝƔƦȳƥƛƜƘƟ ƔȎƦȶƟ ǿ ǮȷƤ. L 1 ƝƔƦƑƥƛƜƘƟ: cf. sch. 1088 ubi ƗƔƒƟƧƦƔƜ per ǎƥƛƒƘƜ explicat grammaticus; Su. Ƙ 198 ǖƗƔƒƥƔƦơ: ƝƔƦƐƨƔƖƘƟ 1 lm. add. Lascaris

775 Ʀȶ ƥȶƟ μȷƟƚƤ | ƗȻƣƚμŪ ǒƞƘƠƘƟ : ƘǴƢƘƟ ȃƦƜ ƥȸ ƔȎƦʭ ƢƣơƥȳƖƔƖƘƤ ƦȶƟ ƢȱƢƞơƟ, ȟƤ ƾƢȱƥƦƔƞƦƔƜ ȏƢȶ ƥơʝ. ơǵơƟ ơȎƗȰƟ ƾƨŪ ǏƔƧƦơʝ ƢƔƟơƧƣƖȳƥƔƤ. L; cf. retractationem in T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 775–6 Ʀȶ ƥȶƟ – ǎƥƦƔƞμƐƟơƟ 1–2 sch. ita reformavit T: ƘǴƢƘ, ƨƚƥƒƟ, ȃƦƜ ƥȸ ƔȎƦʭ ƦơʝƦơƟ ƾƢƐƥƦƘƜƞƔƤ ȣƥƢƘƣ ǤƟ ƾƢƘƥƦƔƞμƐƟơƟ ȏƢȶ ƥơʝ ƝƔȴ ơȎƝ ƔȎƦȶƤ ǤƟ ƾƨŪ ǏƔƧƦơʝ ƢƔƟơƧƣƖƑƥƔƤ 1 ƔȎƦʭ i.e. Herculi 2 ȟƤ significat

182

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

ȃƦƜ, non ȣƥƢƘƣ (sicut), et sententia ȟƤ ƾƢƐƥƦƔƞƦƔƜ ȏƢȶ ƥơʝ a verbo ƘǴƢƘƟ regitur; aliter interpretatus est Ƈ

779a μȯƣƪƔƤ ƢơƗȷƤ ƟƜƟ : ƗƣƔƠȯμƘƟơƤ Ʀơʝ ƢơƗȶƤ ƦȶƟ ſȵƩƔƟ ƝƔƦŪ ǎƝƘʎƟơ Ʀȶ μȱƣơƤ ǒƟƛƔ ƗƘƥμƘʎƦƔƜ Ʀȶ ǂƣƛƣơƟŭ ƞȱƖƘƜ ƗȰ Ʀȶ ƢƘƣȴ ƦȶƟ ƾƥƦƣȯƖƔƞơƟ μȱƣơƤ ơȕ ƘǮȻƛƔμƘƟ ƗƘƥμƘʎƟ ȏƢȷƗƚμƔ Ǣ ƦƜ ƦơƜơʝƦơ. L T 2 ƗƘƥμƘʎƦƔƜ: de ƞƧƖƒƙƘƥƛƔƜ sensu ƗƘƥμƘʎƥƛƔƜ vel sim. accepto cf. sch. Theocr. I 95– 8g ƞƧƖƜƠƘʎƟ: Ʀȶ ƕƘƣƖȵơƜƤ ƗȳƥƘƜƟ, ǢƦơƜ ƗȳƥƘƜƟ ƞȹƖơƜƤ [ƢƔƣȮ Ʀȶ ƗƘƥμƘȹƘƜƟ]. ƝƔȴ ȋμƚƣơƤ (ſ 105)· «ƗȵƗƚ μȷƥƩơƜƥƜ ƞȹƖơƜƥƜƟ». Ǡ ƝƞȯƥƘƜƟ· ƿƢƔƞȶƤ ƖȮƣ ǿ ƞȹƖơƤ; ibid. 95–8l ǎƗƘƥμƘƯƛƚƤŭ μƘƦƔƨơƣƜƝȲ ǟ ƞƐƠƜƤ ƾƢȶ Ʀơʝ ƞƯƖơƧ 1 lm. deest in Ƈ; accuratiss. v. 779 μƏƣƪƔƤ – ƞƧƖƒƙƘƦƔƜ post ƗƣƔƠȯμƘƟơƤ add. ƨƚƥȴ Ƈ ƦȶƟ ſƒƩƔƟ Valckenaer 73v: Ʀơʝ ſƒƩƔ LT 2 ƗƘƥμƘʎƦƔƜ Ʀȶ ǂƣƛƣơƟ] ƞƧƖƒƙƘƦƔƜ ƝƔȴ ƢƘƣƜƥƦƣƐƨƘƦƔƜ, ȃƢơƧ ǎƥƦȴƟ ǿ ƗƘƥμȶƤ ƦʬƟ ƟƘƯƣƫƟ, Ƈ 3 post μȱƣơƤ add. ǒƣƣƜƪƘƟ ƔȎƦƮƟ Ƈ 3 ơȕ – fin. om. Ƈ ơȕ Brunck1: ȁ L: ɣ Lascaris

779b (ƞƧƖƒƙƘƦƔƜ): ƘDzƣƚƦƔƜ [ƗȰ] ƾƢȶ ƦʬƟ ƞȹƖƫƟŭ ƘȎȱƞƜƝƦơƟ ƖȮƣ Ʀȶ ƨƧƦȶƟ ƟȱơƟ ȂƟŭ ȋμƚƣơƤ ƗȵƗƚ μȷƥƩơƜƥƜ ƞȹƖơƜƥƜ. L T 1–3 vide locos similes ad sch. pr. congestos

2 ȋμƚƣơƤ: Il. 11. 105

1–3 haec a sch. pr. separavi: cum sch. 779c.2 ȏƢơƗƘƥμơƯμƘƛƔ coniunxit Nauck 434 1 lm. addidi ƗȰ delevi ƘȎȱƞƜƝƦơƟ] ƘȎƞƯƖƜƥƦơƟ Ƈ 2 ƟƐơƟ – fin. om. Ƈ

779c (ǂƣƛƣơƟ) ɓ ƞƧƖȵƙƘƦƔƜ : ƿƣμȷƙƘƦƔƜ, ƝȯμƢƦƘƦƔƜ, ƥƧƥƦƣȱƨƘƦƔƜŭ ȃƢơƧ ǎƥƦȴƟ ǿ ƗƘƥμȶƤ ƦʬƟ ƟƘƯƣƫƟ, ǒƟƛƔ ȏƢơƗƘƥμơȹμƘƛƔ. L; cf. gl. in Ts.l. 1 ƝƏμƢƦƘƦƔƜ, ƥƧƥƦƣƐƨƘƦƔƜ: cf. sch. Theocr. I 95–8c; ibid. 95–8e; sch. Plat. R. 405c; Erot. ƞ 19; Phot. ƞ 430 = Su. ƞ 771; Hesych. ƞ 1333 ƞƧƖȵƙƘƦƔƜ· ƥƧƟƗȱƗƘƦƔƜ. ƥƦƣȱƨƘƦƔƜ (Soph. Trach. 779); ibid. ƞ 1332; ibid. ƞ 1334; Phot. ƞ 429 1 lm. L supplevi ƿƣμƮƙƘƦƔƜ – ƥƧƥƦƣƐƨƘƦƔƜ] ƝƏμƢƦƘƦƔƜ gl. ad ƞƧƖƒƙƘƦƔƜ nec plura Ƈ

sch. 775 – sch. 784

183

780 (ƾμƨȵƝƞƧƥƦơƟ ǎƝ ƢƮƟƦơƧ): ƦȲƟ ǎƝ Ʀơʝ ƢȷƟƦơƧ ƾμƨơƦȱƣƫƛƘƟ ƝƞƧƙơμȱƟƚƟ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. addidi ǎƝ Ʀơʝ ƢȷƟƦơƧ om. Ƈ

781 ƝȷμƚƤ ƗȰ ƞƘƧƝȶƟ μƧƘƞȷƟ : ƗƜȮ ƗȰ ƦʀƤ ƝȷμƚƤ ƦȶƟ ǎƖƝȱƨƔƞơƟ ǎƝƣƔȵƟƘƜ ƝƔƦȮ μȱƥơƟ ƦʀƤ ƝƘƨƔƞʀƤ ƗƜƔƥƩƜƥƛƘȵƥƚƤ. L T 1 lm. deest in L; accuratiss. vv. 781–2 ƝƮμƚƤ ƗȰ – ƗƜƔƥƢƔƣƐƟƦơƤ ƗƜȮ ƗȰ ƦʀƤ ƝƮμƚƤ] ǎƝ ƦʀƤ ƝƮμƚƤ, ƨƚƥƒƟ, Ƈ ƦȶƟ ǎƖƝȱƨƔƞơƟ] ƦȶƟ μƧƘƞȶƟ Ƈ 2 ƝƔƦȮ μƐƥơƟ Wolff 200: ƝƔƦȮ Ʀȶ μƐƥơƟ Ƈ: ƝƔƦȮ μƐƥơƤ L

781–2 (ƝƮμƚƤ – ǿμơʝ ): ȃ ǎƥƦƜ ƗƜƔƜƣƘƛƘȵƥƚƤ ƦʀƤ ƝƘƨƔƞʀƤ ƗƜȮ ƦʀƤ ƝȷμƚƤ ƾƟƘƢȱμƢƘƦơ ǿ ǎƖƝȱƨƔƞơƤ ƥȸƟ Ʀʭ ƔdzμƔƦƜ. L T 1–2 haec a sch. pr. seiunxi

1 lm. addidi; enarratorem ƔǯμƏƗƔƤ ƛŪ ǿμơʝ pro ƔdzμƔƦƮƤ 2 Ʀʭ om. T

ƛŪ ǿμơʝ legisse collegit Hermann 135 ƗƜȮ] ǎƝ T

783 (ƾƟƘƧƨȳμƚƥƘƟ): ƝƔƦȮ Ʀȶ ǎƟƔƟƦȵơƟ, ƾƟƦȴ ǎƥƦȱƟƔƠƘƟ. L 1 ǎƥƦȱƟƔƠƘƟ cf. Hesych. Ɣ 4999 ƾƟƘƧƨƚμȳƥƘƜ· ƾƟơƜμȻƠƘƜ, ƝƔƦȮ ƾƟƦȵƨƣƔƥƜƟ. ƆơƨơƝƞʀƤ ƇƣƔƩƜƟȵƔƜƤ (783); sch. Eur. Tr. 578 Ʀȵ ƢƔƜɱƟŪ ǎμȷƟ: ǎƢƘƜƗȲ ƘǴƢƘƟ ơDzμơƜ, ƞȱƖƘƜ· ƗƜȮ Ʀȵ ƦȶƟ ǎμȶƟ ƛƣʀƟơƟ ƛƣƚƟƘʎƤũ ƢƔƜɱƟƔ Ɨȱ ƨƚƥƜ ƝƔƦȮ ƾƟƦȵƨƣƔƥƜƟ, ȟƤ Ʀȶ [Soph. Trach. 783] "ǃƢƔƤ ƗŪ ƾƟƘƧƨȳμƚƥƘƟ ơǮμƫƖʁ ƞƘȻƤ"; Ɔb Ɣ 1331 ŵƟƘƧƨȳμƚƥƘƟŭ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǎƛƣȳƟƚƥƘ. ƄƞȯƦƫƟ (Phaed. 60a). = Phot. Ɣ 1892 = Su. Ɣ 2348 1 lm. add. Papageorgiou: deest in L qui apud poetam ǂƟƘƧ ƨƫƟʀƤ ǎƟ praebet; grammaticum ƾƟƘƧƨƑμƚƥƘƟ legisse coni. Hermann 136 (contuli etiam locos similes)

784 Ʀơʝ μȰƟ ƟơƥơʝƟƦơƤ : Ʀơʝ ǧƣƔƝƞȱơƧƤ ƟơƥơʝƟƦơƤ, Ʀơʝ ƗȰ ſȵƩƔ ǢƗƚ ƾƟƧƥƛȱƟƦơƤ, ȃ ǎƥƦƜ ƢƘƨơƟƘƧμȱƟơƧ. L; cf. gll. in Ts.l. 2 ƢƘƨơƟƘƧμƐƟơƧ: cf. Lex. Vind. Ɨ 22 ƗƜƔƢƣƏƦƦơμƔƜ Ʀȶ ƨơƟƘƯƫ…

184

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

1 lm. accuratiss. v. 784 Ʀơʝ μȰƟ – ƗƜƔƢƘƢƣƔƖμƐƟơƧ Ʀơʝ ǧƣƔƝƞȱơƧƤ ƟơƥơʝƟƦơƤ] Ʀơʝ ǧƣƔƝƞȱơƧƤ gl. ad Ʀơʝ μȰƟ nec plura T 1–2 Ʀơʝ ƗȰ ſƒƩƔ ǢƗƚ ƾƟƧƥƛƐƟƦơƤ] Ʀơʝ ſƒƩƔ gl. ad ƦơʝƗƘ nec plura T 1 ſƒƩƔ Brunck1 (cf. gl. in T), cf. sch. 779a.1 (app. crit.): ſƒƩơƧ L 2 ȃ ǎƥƦƜ ƢƘƨơƟƘƧμȱƟơƧ] ƢƘƨơƟƘƧμƐƟơƧ gl. ad ƗƜƔƢƘƢƣƔƖμƐƟơƧ nec plura T

786 (ǎƥƢɱƦơ ƖȮƣ ƢȱƗơƟƗƘ): ƥƢƔƥμʭ ƖȮƣ ƘDzƞƚƢƦơ ƝƘȵμƘƟơƤ ǎƢȴ ƦʀƤ ƖʀƤ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley ƦʀƤ om. T

788 ſơƝƣʬƟ [ȂƣƘƜơƜ ƢƣʬƟƘƤ] : ȋμƚƣơƤ

ſơƝƣʬƟ ƗŪ ǟƖƘμȷƟƘƧƘƟ ȆƜƞʀơƤ ƦƔƩȸƤ ŵDzƔƤ ſơƝƣʬƟ ơDZ ƟƔȵơƧƥƜ ƢȱƣƚƟ ǯƘƣʀƤ ŹȎƕơȵƚƤ. L T 2 Il. 2. 527

3 Il. 2.535

1 lm. L decurtavi: deest in T (Lascaris): ơǵơƜ L

2 ǟƖƘμƮƟƘƧƘƟ] ǟμơƖƐƟƘƧƘƟ (sic) T

3 ơDZ TLp

789 ǎƢƘȴ ƗŪ ƾƢƘʎƢƘƟ : ƾƢȱƝƔμƘƟ, ƾƢƚƖȷƣƘƧƥƘƟ ǏƔƧƦȷƟ, ȏƢƘƣƝȱƝμƚƝƘƟ, ƾƢƘȵƣƚƝƘƟ ƢƣȶƤ ƦȮƤ ǾƗȹƟƔƤ ǎƢȴ ƖʀƤ ƝƧƞƜȷμƘƟơƤ. L T 1 ƾƢȱƝƔμƘƟ, ƾƢƚƖȷƣƘƧƥƘƟ cf. sch. Eur. Hec. 942 (ad lm. ƦȯƞƔƜƟŪ ƾƢƘʎƢơƟ ǂƞƖƘƜ): ƾƢƘȵƣƚƝƔ ƦơʎƤ ƝƔƝơʎƤ ǟ ƾƛƞȵƔ ǎƖȻ; sch. D Hom. Il. 9.675 ƾƢƐƘƜƢƘ: ƾƢƚƖƮƣƘƧƥƘ; Harp. 43, 7 džƢƘƜƢƘʎƟŭ, ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƾƢơƝƔμƘʎƟ ƝƔȴ ƾƗƧƟƔƦʀƥƔƜ… = Ɔb Ɣ 1672 = Phot. Ɣ 2315 = Su. I 280, 25 s.v. Ɣ 3124; Phot. Ɣ 2316 ƾƢƘƜƢƘʎƟ· Ʀȶ ƝƔμƘʎƟ ƝƔȴ ƾƢƔƖơƣƘʝƥƔƜ...; Lex. Vind. Ɣ 106 ƾƢƘƜƢƘʎƟŭ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƾƢƔƖơƣƘʝƥƔƜŭ ơǵơƟ ƾƢƘƜƢƘʎƟ ƢƣȶƤ ƾƞƞƘƢƔƞƞƑƞơƧƤ ƥƧμƨơƣƏƤ...; Su. Ɣ 3125 … Ǡ džƢƘƜƢưƟ, ƾƢơƝƔμưƟ, ƾƢƔƖơƣƘƯƥƔƤ…; Eust. Od. I 24, 20–1 ƞȱƖƘƦƔƜ Ɨȱ ƢơƦƘ ƾƢƘƜƢƘʎƟ, ƝƔȴ Ʀȶ ǎƟ ƾƖʬƟƜ Ǡ μȯƩɾ ƾƢƔƖơƣƘʝƥƔƜ ƝƔȴ ƾƢơƝƔμƘʎƟ. ȃ Ƣȱƣ ǎƥƦƜƟ ǴƥơƟ Ʀʭ ƾƢƔƧƗʀƥƔƜ ƝƔȴ ƾƢƘƜƣƚƝȱƟƔƜ ƝƔȴ ƾƢƔƖơƣƘʝƥƔƜ; ibid. II 126, 26–8 ǶƥƦȱơƟ ƗȰ ȃƦƜ ǂƞƞƫƤ ƝơƜƟȷƦƘƣơƟ Ʀȶ ƾƢƘƜƢƘʎƟ ƢƔƣȮ ƦơʎƤ μƘƛŪ ȋμƚƣơƟ· ƦƔƧƦȶƟ Ɩȯƣ ǎƥƦƜ Ʀʭ ƾƢƔƖơƣƘʝƥƔƜ, ơǵơƟ· ƦȯƞƔƜƟŪ ƾƢƘʎƢơƟ ǂƞƖƘƜ. Ʀȶ ƗŪ ƔȎƦȶ ƝƔȴ ƾƢƔƧƗɱƟ ƝƔȴ ƾƢƘƜƣƚƝȱƟƔƜ ƞȱƖƘƦƔƜ 1 lm.] ƾƢƘʎƢƘƟ T; accuratiss. vv. 789–90 ǎƢƘȴ – ǏƔƧƦƮƟ ƾƢȱƝƔμƘƟ – ǏƔƧƦȷƟ] post ƝƧƞƜȷμƘƟơƤ (2) praeposito Ǡ transp. T, nisi quod ǏƔƧƦơʝ pro ǏƔƧƦȶƟ (1) scripsit

sch. 784 – sch. 793

185

ƾƢƚƖƮƣƘƧƥƘƟ ǏƔƧƦƮƟ] cf. [Arc.] 2, 1–2 ǟ μȲ [ǎƢƜƢơƞƞơʎƤ ǃμƔ ƗƜȮ] ƦʬƟ ƢƔƣƔƗƘƜƖμƏƦƫƟ ƘȎƛȸƤ ƢƔƣƏƛƘƥƜƤ ƾƢƔƖơƣƘƯƘƜ ƗƜƏƟơƜƔƟ…

791a1 ǎƟƗƔƦơȹμƘƟơƤ : ƥƨơƗƣʬƤ ǎƥƛȵƘƜƟ. L T

ƥƨơƗƣʬƤ ƞơƜƗơƣơȹμƘƟơƤŭ ǎƟƗƔƦƘʎƥƛƔƜ ƖȮƣ

1 ƞơƜƗơƣơƯμƘƟơƤ: cf. sch. 791a2; Hesych. Ƙ 2740 ǎƟƗƔƦơȹμƘƟơƤ· μƘƣƜƙȷμƘƟơƤ. ƝƔȴ ơǯơƟƘȴ ƝƔƝʬƤ ƞȱƖƫƟ ƥƨơƗƣʬƤ. ƾƢȶ ƦʀƤ ƗƔƜƦȷƤ (Eur. Herc. 218) 1–2 de T vide ad sch. 791a2.1–5

791a2 (ǎƟƗƔƦơƯμƘƟơƤ): ƞơƜƗơƣʬƟ, μƘμƨȷμƘƟơƤ, ƝƔƦȮ μȱƣơƤ ƦʬƟ ƞƘƖơμȱƟƫƟ ƾƟƔƝƔƞʬƟŭ ǎƟƗƔƦƘʎƥƛƔƜ ƖȮƣ Ʀȶ μƘƣȵƥƔƥƛƔƜ. ǟ ƗȰ μƘƦƔƨơƣȮ ƾƢȶ ƦʬƟ ƗƔƜƟƧμƐƟƫƟ. ǂƞƞƫƤŭ ǎƟƗƔƦơȹμƘƟơƤ ƟʝƟ ƥƨȷƗƣƔ ƝƔƝʬƤ ƞȱƖƫƟ, ƗƧƥƨƚμʬƟ, ƥƧƟƘƩʬƤ μƘμƨȷμƘƟơƤ, ǎƢƔƣȻμƘƟơƤŭ ǒƟƜơƜ ƗȰ ƖƣȯƨơƧƥƜƟ 5 ǎμμƔƦơȹμƘƟơƤ ƾƟƦȴ μƔƥȻμƘƟơƤ. L T 1 ƞơƜƗơƣʬƟ: vide ad sch. pr. 2 ǎƟƗƔƦƘʎƥƛƔƜ ƖȮƣ Ʀȶ μƘƣƒƥƔƥƛƔƜ: cf. sch. OT 205 ǎƟƗƔƦƘʎƥƛƔƜ] ǎƟ μƘƣƜƥμʭ ƗȵƗơƥƛƔƜ ƝƔȴ ƗƜƔƦƣȵƕƘƜƟ· μƘƦʀƝƦƔƜ ƗȰ ƾƢȶ ƦʬƟ ƗƜƔƟƘμơμȱƟƫƟ; sch. Aesch. Th. 578h ǎƟƗƔƦơȹμƘƟơƤ· ƗƜƔƜƣʬƟ, μƘƣȵƙƫƟ ƘǮƤ Ɨȹơ Ʀȶ ǑƟ ƥȹƟƛƘƦơƟ ȂƟơμƔ…; Hesych. Ƙ 2740 ǎƟƗƔƦơȹμƘƟơƤ· μƘƣƜƙȷμƘƟơƤ. ƝƔȴ ơǯơƟƘȴ ƝƔƝʬƤ ƞȱƖƫƟ ƥƨơƗƣʬƤ. ƾƢȶ ƦʀƤ ƗƔƜƦȷƤ (Eur. Herc. 218); ibid. Ƙ 2739; Eust. Il. IV 173, 22 – 174, 1 ǎƟƦƘʝƛƘƟ ƗȰ ƝƔȴ ƆơƨơƝƞʀƤ ƞƔƕȺƟ Ʀȶ ǎƢƜƝơƧƣȵƔƟ ƢơƛȰƟ μƘƣȵƙƘƜƟ ǎƟƗƔƦƘʎƥƛƔƜ ǒƨƚ; ibid. IV 426, 4 ƛƘƒƔƟ ƖơʝƟ ƗƯƟƔμƜƟ ǎƟƗƔƦƘʎƥƛƔƒ ƨƔƥƒ ƦƜƟƘƤ, ǢƖơƧƟ ƝƔƦȮ ǓƝƔƥƦơƟ μƘƣƒƙƘƥƛƔƜ… 1–5 haec quae scholio priori subiungit L separatim posui et lemmate instruxi 1– 5 haec cum sch. pr. composuit et ita retractavit T: ǎƟƗƔƦơƯμƘƟơƤ: ƥƨơƗƣʬƤ ƞơƜƗơƣʬƟ, μƘμƨƮμƘƟơƤ, ƝƔƦȮ μƐƣơƤ ƝƔƝʬƤ ƞƐƖƫƟ ƔȎƦȶ ƝƔȴ ƗƧƥƨƚμʬƟ ƝƔȴ ƥƧƟƘƩʬƤ ǎƢƔƣưμƘƟơƤŭ ǟ μƘƦƔƨơƣƏ ƾƢȶ ƦʬƟ ƗƔƜƟƟƧμƐƟƫƟ (sic, duplici Ɵ)ŭ ǎƟƗƔƦƘʎƥƛƔƜ ƖȮƣ Ʀȶ ƥƨơƗƣʬƤ ǎƥƛƒƘƜƟ 2 ǎƟƗƔƦƘʎƥƛƔƜ T (Lascaris): ǎƟƗƔƦơʝƥƛƔƜ L 4 ƖƣƏƨơƧƥƜƟ] Ɩƣ. L

793 (ƝƔƦƔƝƦȳƥƔƜƦơ): ƢƞƘơƟȯƙƘƜ ǟ ƝƔƦƏ ƝƔȴ ǒƥƦƜ ƝƦȳƥƔƜƦơ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǒƥƩƘƟ. L 1 lm. add. Lascaris

186

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

794a ƦȷƦ' ǎƝ ƢƣơƥȱƗƣơƧ : ȃƦƘ ƾƢȱƝƔμƘƟ ƝƧƞƜȷμƘƟơƤ, ƦȷƦƘ ƾƟƔƦƘȵƟƔƤ ƦȶƟ ǾƨƛƔƞμȶƟ ƗƜȮ ƦʀƤ ƝƘƩƧμȱƟƚƤ Ʀʭ ƥưμƔƦƜ ƞƜƖƟȹơƤ ƘǴƗȱƟ μƘ ƗƔƝƣƧƣƣơơʝƟƦƔ. L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 789–96 ǎƢƘȴ ƗŪ ƾƢƘʎƢƘ ƢơƞƞȮ μȰƟ ƦƏƞƔƤ ƩƛơƟȴ | ʜƒƢƦƫƟ ǏƔƧƦƮƟ … ƦƮƦŪ ǎƝ ƢƣơƥƐƗƣơƧ ƞƜƖƟƯơƤ – ƗƔƝƣƧƣƣơơʝƟƦƔ post ȃƦƘ add. ƨƚƥȴƟ T ƾƢȱƝƔμƘƟ] ƾƢƘʎƢƘ ƝƔȴ ǎƢƔƯƥƔƦơ T 2 ƝƘƩƧμƐƟƚƤ] ƝƔƦƔƝƘƩƧμƐƟƚƤ coni. Hermann2 118 Ʀʭ ƥưμƔƦƜ Kruytbosch 49: Ʀơʝ ƥưμƔƦơƤ L: ƦơʎƤ ȂμμƔƥƜ T

794b ƞƜƖƟȹơƤ [ƗȰ] Ǡ ƦʀƤ ƢƔƣƔƝƘƜμȱƟƚƤ ƾƟƔƛƧμƜȯƥƘƫƤ ƝƔȴ ƝƔƢƟơʝ Ǡ ƦʀƤ ƢƔƣƔƝƘƜμȱƟƚƤ ƝƔȴ ƢƘƣƜƝƘƩƧμȱƟƚƤ ƔȎƦʭ ƨƞơƖȻƗơƧƤ ƟȷƥơƧ. L T 1 ƾƟƔƛƧμƜȯƥƘƫƤ et 2 ƝƔƢƟơʝ, ƨƞơƖȻƗơƧƤ sch. Aesch. Th. 494e ƞƜƖƟƯƟ] ƝƔƢƟƮƟ, ƾƟƔƛƧμƒƔƥƜƟ; Erot. Ɩ 5 ƖƞʬƥƥƔ ƞƜƖƟƧȻƗƚƤ … ȞƟȷμƔƥƦƔƜ ƗȰ ƢƔƣȮ ƦȲƟ ƞƜƖƟȹƟ, ǣƦƜƤ ǎƥƦȴ ƝƔƢƟȻƗƚƤ ƔǮƛȯƞƚ. ƖȵƟƘƦƔƜ ƗȰ ƦơƜƔȹƦƚ ƗƜȮ ƦȲƟ ȏƢƘƣƕȯƞƞơƧƥƔƟ ƨƞȷƖƫƥƜƟ…; sch. Ap. Rh. 40, 6 ƝƔƢƟƮƟ; ibid. 309, 6 ƞƜƖƟȹƤ: ǟ ƝƔƢƟȻƗƚƤ ƾƟƔƨơƣȯ…; Hesych. ƚ 355 ǟ ƞƜƖƟȹƤ· ǿ ƝƔƢƟȷƤ; ibid. ƞ 972 ƞƜƖƟƯƤŭ … ƨƞƮƠ; Ɔ ƞ 100 ƞƜƖƟȹƤŭ ǟ ƾƟȯƗơƥƜƤ Ʀơʝ ƝƔƢƟơʝ = Phot. ƞ 301 = Su. ƞ 502 1–3 haec a sch. pr. separavi ƞƜƖƟƯơƤ – fin. ita reformavit T: ƞƜƖƟȸƟ ƗȰ ƦȲƟ ƢƘƣƜƝƘƩƧμƐƟƚƟ ƦơʎƤ ǾƨƛƔƞμơʎƤ ƔȎƦơʝ ƾƩƞȸƟ ƞƐƖƘƜ, ƾƢȶ ƦʀƤ ƟƮƥơƧ 1 ƢƣơƥƐƗƣơƧ addidi ƗȰ delevi 2 ƔȎƦʭ Stephanus 359: ƔȎƦȶƟ L: possis etiam ƔȎƦȶƟ

799 (DŽƣơƟ): ƢƣơƥƦƔƝƦƜƝʬƤ. L 1 lm. add. Brunck2; ƔǴƣơƟ (sic) apud poetam praebet L

801 ƘǮ ƗŪ ơǴƝƦơƟ DzƥƩƘƜƤ, ƾƞƞȯ μŪ ǒƝ ƖƘ ƦʀƥƗƘ : ǎƟɿƥƩƧƦƔƜ ƖȮƣ ƔȎƦơʝ ƛƔƟƘʎƟ μȲ ǎƖƖƘƞƔƥƛʁ ȏƢȶ ƦʬƟ ƃǮƩƔƞȵƫƟ. L T 1 lm. deest in L; accuratiss. vv. 801–2 ƘǮ ƗŪ ơǴƝƦơƟ – ƛƏƟƫ ǎƟɿƥƩƧƦƔƜ Elmsley prob. Nauck 434 (cf. sch. 1018b.1 ȢƠƧƟƦƔƜ): ǎƟɿƥƩƧƦƔƜ L: ƔǮƥƩƯƟƘƦƔƜ T ƖȮƣ om. Ƈ 2 ƃǮƩƔƞƒƫƟ] ƃǮƩƔƞƜƐƫƟ Brunck1, sed cf. Steph. Byz. 488, 7 ƞƐƖƘƦƔƜ ƝƔȴ ƃǮƩƏƞƜơƤ

187

sch. 794a – sch. 813

805 (ƕƣƧƩȻμƘƟơƟ ƥƢƔƥμơʎƥƜ): ƾƟơƜμȻƙơƟƦƔ μƘƖȯƞƫƤ ǎƝ ƦʬƟ ƥƢƔƥμʬƟ. L 1 ƾƟơƜμưƙơƟƦƔ: cf. sch. 1072 (ƕƐƕƣƧƩƔ): ƾƟƔƕơʬ 1 lm. add. Papageorgiou

808 (ƢơȵƟƜμơƤ): ǟ ƦƜμƫƣȷƤ, ǟ ƢơƜƟȲƟ ƾƢƔƜƦơʝƥƔ. L Ts.l. Su. Ƣ 3092 ... ƝƔȴ ƄơȵƟƜμơƜ, Ɣǯ ƦƜμƫƣƚƦƜƝƔȴ ǖƣƜƟƟȹƘƤ. ƆơƨơƝƞʀƤ. DzƦƘ, Ȥ ƦƔƩƘʎƔƜ ƢơȵƟƜμơȵ ƦŪ ǖƣƜƟƟȹƘƤ, ƖƘȹƘƥƛƘ, μȲ ƨƘȵƗƘƥƛƘ ƢƔƟƗȳμơƧ ƥƦƣƔƦơʝ. 1 lm. add. Elmsley ǟ ƢơƜƟȲƟ T (Lascaris): ǟ ƢơƜƟȲ ǟ L

810 ƛȱμƜƤ ƗŪ, ǎƢƘȵ μơƜ ƦȲƟ ƛȱμƜƟ : ƛȱμƜƤ Ɨȱ ǎƥƦƜƟ ǟμɱƤ ƝƔƦƔƣɱƥƛƔȵ ƥơƜ, ǎƢƘȴ ƥȸ ƢƣơƦȱƣƔ ƦȲƟ ƛȱμƜƟ ƾƢȱƣƣƜƪƔƤ ƝƔȴ ƢƔƣƘʎƗƘƤ. ǎȮƟ ƗȰ ƢƣơȒƞƔƕƘƤ, ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƨƛȯƥƔƥƔ ƦȲƟ ƛȱμƜƟ [ƝƔȴ] ơȎƝ ǎƠƘƗȱƠƫ, ǓƫƤ ƦƜ ƝƔƦȮ Ʀȶ ƗȵƝƔƜơƟ ƢƣȯƠɾƤ. L T 1 lm. deest in T; annotatorem ad ƢƣơȒƕƔƞƘƤ spectare e ƢƣƮƦƘƣƔ ... ƾƢƐƣƣƜƪƔƤ (2) conicias; accuratiss. v. 810 ƛȱμƜƤ ƗŪ – ƢƣơȒƕƔƞƘƤ /ƢƣơȒƞƔƕƘƤ ƛƐμƜƤ ƗƐ ǎƥƦƜƟ] ƛƐμƜƤ ǎƥƦƒƟ, ƨƚƥƒƟ T 2 ǎȮƟ – 3 ƛƐμƜƟ om. T (ƢƣơƯƞƔƕƘƤ apud poetam praebet T) 2 ǎȮƟ ƗȰ ƢƣơȒƞƔƕƘƤ] scil. ƖƣƏƨƚƦƔƜ 3 ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ Lp (Lascaris): ƾƟ (sic) Ʀơʝ L ƨƛƏƥƔƥƔ] ǒƨƛƔƥƔƤ Blaydes 174 servato ƝƔȴ ƝƔȴ del. Kruytbosch 49 ǎƠƘƗƐƠƫ] ǎƗƐƠƫ T 4 ƢƣȯƠɾƤ] ƢƣƏƠƘƜƔƤ T (coni. iam Kruytbosch 49)

813 Ʀȵ ƥʎƖŪ ƾƨȱƣƢƘƜƤ; : ƥʎƖƔ ǎƢƜƣƣƚμƔƦƜƝʬƤ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƥƜƫƢƚƞʬƤŭ ƦơƧƦȱƥƦƜ, ƗƜȮ Ʀȵ ơȎƗȰƟ ƾƢơƝƣȵƟɾ ƢƣȶƤ ƦȶƟ țƞƞơƟ; L Ts.l. 1 ƥʎƖƔ – ƥƜƫƢƚƞʬƤ: cf. sch. Ph. 22 ƥʎƖƔ] ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƥƜƫƢʁ 1 lm. deest in T (lm.) ƾƨƐƣƢƘƜƤ] ƾƨƐƣƪƘƜƤ Lpa.c. aut p.c. fin.] ita retractavit T: ǎƢƘȴ ơȎƝ ƾƢơƝƣƒƟɾ Ʀʭ țƞƞʪ T

ƥʎƖƔ om. T

1–2 ƦơƧƦȱƥƦƜ –

188

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

814 (ƠƧƟƚƖơƣƘʎƤ): ƥƧƟɰƗƘƜƤ, ƥƧμƨƫƟƘʎƤ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 ƥƧμƨƫƟƘʎƤ: cf. sch. 1164 ubi μƔƟƦƘʎƔ ... ƠƧƟƑƖơƣƔ per μƔƟƦƘƒƔƟ ... ƥƧμƨƫƟơʝƥƔƟ explicuit scholiasta 1 lm. add. Lascaris

815 ơȔƣơƤ ǾƨƛƔƞμʬƟ ǎμʬƟ : ƘDzƛƘ ơȔƣơƤ ƝƔƞȶƤ ǎƢƜƢƟƘȹƥƘƜƘƟ ƔȎƦʁ ƾƢƜơȹƥɾ, dzƟƔ μƚƝȱƦƜ ƔȎƦȲƟ DzƗơƜμƜ. ƦƣơƢƜƝʬƤ ƗȰ Ʀȶ ơȔƣơƤ ȟƤ ǎƢȴ ƟƘưƤ, ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ơȎƣƜơƗƣơμƘȵƦƫ. L T 1 lm. deest in T; commentatorem ƝƔƞȷƤ pro ƝƔƞʬƤ apud poetam invenisse coni. Wolff 56; accuratiss. vv. 815–6 ơȔƣơƤ – ƝƔƞƮƤ post ƘDzƛƘ add. ƨƚƥƒƟ T ǎƢƜƢƟƘƯƥƘƜƘƟ T a Lp: ǎƢƜƢƟƘƯƥƘƜ L: ǎƢƜƢƟƘƯƥƔƜ Blaydes 174: ǎƢƜƢƟƘƯƥơƜ Lascaris

817a ȂƖƝơƟ ƖȮƣ ǂƞƞƫƤ ǾƟȷμƔƦơƤ : Ʀȵ ƖȮƣ μȯƦƚƟ ǎƢƔƜƣȷμƘƛƔ Ʀʭ ƦʀƤ μƚƦƣȶƤ ǾƟȷμƔƦƜ ơȎƗȰƟ ǂƠƜơƟ ƔȏƦʀƤ ƗƜƔƢƣƔƠƔμȱƟƚƤ ȥƟ ƨȹƥƜƤ ƝƔȴ ǿ ƛƘƥμȶƤ ƾƢɿƦƘƜũ L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 817–8 ȂƖƝơƟ – Ɨƣɲ ƖȮƣ om. T post ǎƢƔƜƣƮμƘƛƔ add. ƨƚƥȴ T 2 ƔȏƦʀƤ] ƔȎƦʀƤ T post ȥƟ add. ǟ Lascaris ǿ om. T

817b (ƦƣȱƨƘƜƟ): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǒƩƘƜƟ. Ls.l. 1 vide ad sch. 28 1 lm. add. Lascaris

821a DzƗŪ ơǵơƟ, Ȥ ƢƔʎƗƘƤ : ǿ ƩơƣȶƤ ƢƣȶƤ ƾƞƞȳƞƔƤ ƗƜƔƞȱƖƘƦƔƜ ƢƘƣȴ Ʀơʝ ƗƘƗơμȱƟơƧ μƔƟƦƘȵơƧ Ʀʭ ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ ǎƟ Ʀʁ ŸƫƗȻƟɾ ȃƦƜ ƟʝƟ ƾƢȱƕƚ. Ʀȶ ƗȰ ơǵơƟ ƾƟƦȴ ơdzƫƤ, ơǵơƟŭ ǿƣɱƦƘ, Ȥ ƨȵƞƔƜ, ơdzƫƤ ǟμʎƟ ƾƛƣȷƫƤ ƥƧƟȱƢƘƥƘƟ ƝƔȴ ƘǮƤ ơǵơƟ ƝƔƝȶƟ ƾƢȱƕƚ Ʀȶ ǒƢơƤ ǎƝ ƦʀƤ μƔƟƦƘȵƔƤ ƢȯƞƔƜ ƩƣƚƥƛȱƟ. L T

sch. 814 – sch. 824

189

1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 821–3 DzƗŪ ơǵơƟ – ƢƣơƟơƒƔƤ ǿ ƩơƣȶƤ ... ƗƜƔƞƐƖƘƦƔƜ] Ɣǯ Ʀơʝ Ʃơƣơʝ ... ƘǮƥȴ ƗƜƔƞƘƖƮμƘƟƔƜ T 2 μƔƟƦƘƒơƧ] μƔƟƦƘƯμƔƦơƤ T 2 Ʀȶ ƗȰ – 3 ơdzƫƤ (pr.) om. Ƈ 3 ơǵơƟ (alt.) (scilicet h.l. valet)] ƝƔƒ ƨƚƥƜƟ Ƈ ǿƣɱƦƘ – ƾƛƣƮƫƤ] ơǵơƟ ǟμʎƟ, Ȥ ƨȵƞƔƜ, Ƈ 4 post ǒƢơƤ add. Ʀȶ Ƈ (add. iam Papageorgiou) ƦʀƤ μƔƟƦƘƒƔƤ] Ʀơʝ μƔƟƦƘƒơƧ Ƈ

821b1 ƢƣơƥȱμƜƠƘƟ [ƗȰ] ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƢƣơƥƘƣƣȯƖƚ ǾƠȱƫƤ. L 1 ƢƣơƥƐμƜƠƘƟ – fin.: cf. sch. 821b2; sch. Ph. 106 ƢƣơƥμʎƠƔƜ] ƢƞƚƥƜƏƥƔƜ; Hesych. Ƣ 3840 ƢƣơƥμȵƠƔƤŭ ƢƣơƥƘƞƛȻƟ... 1 haec a sch. pr. separavi ǂƨƔƣ addidi

ƗȰ delevi

821b2 (ƢƣơƥȱμƜƠƘƟ): ƢƣơƥƘƣƣȯƖƚ. Ls.l. Ts.l. vide ad sch. 821b1 1 lm. add. Elmsley

823 ƦɱƤ ƢƔƞƔƜƨȯƦơƧ ƢƣơƟơȵƔƤ : ƖƣȯƨƘƦƔƜ ƢƔƞƔƜƨơȵƕơƧ, dzƟŪ ɒ ƦʀƤ ƢȯƞƔƜ μƔƟƦƘƧƥƔμȱƟƚƤŭ ƨơƜƕɱƥƛƔƜ ƖȮƣ Ʀȶ μƔƟƦƘȹƘƥƛƔƜ. L 2 ƨơƜƕɱƥƛƔƜ – fin.: cf. Apollon. S. 164, 12–3 … ƾƢȶ Ʀơʝ ƨơƜƕɱƥƛƔƜ, ȃ ǎƥƦƜ μƔƟƦƘȹƘƥƛƔƜ; Hesych. ƨ 676 ƨơƜƕƏƙƘƜŭ μƔƟƦƘƯƘƦƔƜ (Lycophr. 6) 1 Ɩƣ. L

824 ȃ ƦŪ ǒƞƔƝƘƟ : ȃƢƘƣ ǎƨƛȱƖƠƔƦơ, ǎƢƘƜƗȮƟ ǎƟƜƔƧƦȶƤ ƢƔƣȱƞƛơƜ, ƦȷƦƘ ƗƜƔƗơƩȲƟ ƖƘƟȱƥƛƔƜ ƦʬƟ ƢȷƟƫƟ Ʀʭ ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ, Ʀʭ ŸƜȶƤ ƢƔƜƗȵ. L T 1 ǎƨƛƐƖƠƔƦơ: cf. sch. Ant. 1094 ƞƔƝƘʎƟ] ƨƛƐƖƠƔƥƛƔƜ; Hesych. Ƙ 1854 ǒƞƔƝƘƟŭ ǎƨƛƐƖƠƔƦơ; ƞ 377 ƞƏƥƝƘƜƟŭ … ƨƛƐƖƖƘƥƛƔƜ; Phot. ƞ 39 ƞƔƝƘʎƟŭ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƨƛƐƖƖƘƥƛƔƜ

190

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

1 lm.] ǒƞƔƝƘƟ ƗȰ T, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 821a copulet; accuratiss. vv. 824–6 ȃ ƦŪ ǒƞƔƝƘƟ – ƔȎƦƮƢƔƜƗƜ ȃƢƘƣ] ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ȃƢ. T ǎƢƘƜƗȮƟ] ȟƤ ǎƢ. T ƢƔƣƐƞƛơƜ (de modo vide ad sch. 151–2.1 ǎƢƘƜƗȮƟ ƖƔμƚƛƘƒƚ ƦƜƤ; SD II 338)] ƢƔƣƐƞƛɾ T 2 ƖƘƟƐƥƛƔƜ] ƖƘƟƑƥƘƥƛƔƜ T

824–5 ƦƘƞƘȷμƚƟơƤ … (ǂƣơƦơƤ): ǿ ǎƟƜƔƧƦȶƤ ǿ ƦȱƞƘƜơƟ ǒƩƫƟ Ʀȶ ƗƫƗƘƝȯμƚƟơƟ. L T 1 ǎƟƜƔƧƦƮƤ: vide ad sch. 69 1 lm. L extendi: ƦƘƞƘƮμƚƟơƤ ƗȰ T, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 825b iungat

825a [ƝƔȴ] ǂƣơƦơƤ ǿ ǎƟƜƔƧƦȷƤŭ ƾƢȶ Ʀơʝ ǃƢƔƠ ƝƔƦŪ ǎƟƜƔƧƦȶƟ ƾƣơʝƟ. L T 1 vide ad sch. 69 1 haec cum sch. 824–5 coniuncta in codd. (ƝƔȴ ǂƣơƦơƤ L: ǿμơƒƫƤ ƗȰ ƝƔȴ ǂƣơƦơƤ T) separatim collocavi ƝƔȴ quod est in L delevi: ǿμơƒƫƤ ƗȰ ƝƔȴ T

825b ƾƟƔƗơƩȮƟ [ƗȰ] ƾƟȯƢƔƧƥƜƟ, ƾƟƔƝƫƩȳƟ, ƾƟƔƗơƩȳƟ. L T 1 haec a sch. 824 deleto ƗȰ separavi sch. ita rescripsit T: ƾƟƔƗơƩȲƟ ƗȰ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƾƟƏƢƔƧƥƜƟ, ƗƜƔƗơƩƑƟ, ƾƟƔƝƫƩƑƟ ƾƟƔƗơƩƑƟ] ƗƜƔƗơƩƑƟ coni. Wansink 108 (cf. T): del. Papageorgiou, perperam; nam formam doricam vulgari explicat interpres; cf. sch. El. 199a.1 ubi μơƣƨƏƟ per μơƣƨƑƟ explicatur

826 (ƔȎƦȷƢƔƜƗƜ): ƖƟƚƥȵʪ ƢƔƜƗȵ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris

sch. 824 – sch. 829

191

827 ƝƔȴ ƦȯƗŪ ǾƣƛʬƤ : ƦƔʝƦƔ Ɨȱ, ƦȮ ƩƣƚƥƛȱƟƦƔ, ƾƥƨƔƞʬƤ ƟʝƟ ǟμʎƟ ƾƢơƕƔȵƟƘƜ. L; cf. gll. in Ts.l. 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 827–8 ƝƔȴ ƦƏƗŪ – ƝƔƦơƧƣƒƙƘƜ 1–2 ƦƔʝƦƔ Ɨȱ – fin.] ƦȮ ƩƣƚƥƛƐƟƦƔ gl. ad ƦƏƗŪ ǾƣƛʬƤ et ƾƥƨƔƞʬƤ ƾƢơƕƔƒƟƘƜ gl. ad ǒμƢƘƗƔ nec plura Ts.l. 2 ƾƢơƕƔƒƟƘƜ] i.e. scholiasta ƝƔƦơƧƣƒƙƘƜ sensu intrasitivo accipit

827–8 (ƝƔȴ ƦƏƗŪ – ƝƔƦơƧƣƒƙƘƜ): ƦƣơƢƜƝʬƤ ƝƔƦơƧƣȵƙƘƜ, ȣƥƢƘƣ ơȎƣȵʪ ƢƟƘȹμƔƦƜ ƢƣơƥơƣμƒƙƘƜ ǟμʎƟ ƝƔƦŪ ǾƣƛȶƟ ƾƟƧȷμƘƟƔ. L T 1 ƝƔƦơƧƣƒƙƘƜ – fin.: cf. Eust. Il. IV 661, 15–6 … ƝƔƦơƧƣȵƙƘƜƟ Ɨȱ ƖƘ Ʀȶ ƝƔƦŪ ơȔƣơƟ ƢƞȱƘƜƟ, ȟƤ Ʀȶ ƢȷƞƜƟ ƝƔƦŪ ǾƣƛȶƟ ơȒƣƜƥƔƤ. 1–2 haec ut sui iuris scholium leguntur in T: cum sch. 827 coniunguntur in L (ƦƣơƢƜƝʬƤ ƗƐ) 1 lm. addidi ƝƔƦơƧƣƒƙƘƜ L: Ʀȶ ƝƔƦơƧƣƒƙƘƜ T post ƝƔƦơƧƣƒƙƘƜ add. ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ T 2 ƢƣơƥơƣμƒƙƘƜ La.c.T (scholiasta ƝƔƦơƧƣƒƙƘƜ pro verbo transitivo accipit): ƢƣơƥơƣμƘʎ Lp.c.

828 (ƝƔƦơƧƣȵƙƘƜ): ƢƣơƥƢƟƘʎ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris ƢƣơƥƢƟƘʎ] ƢƣơƥƢƟƐƘƜ T

829 ƢʬƤ ƖȮƣ ǀƟ ǿ μȲ ƞƘȹƥƥƫƟ : ƢʬƤ ƖȮƣ ǿ μƚƝȱƦƜ ǿƣʬƟ Ʀȶ ƨʬƤ ƢƔƣȮ ŹȎƣƧƥƛȱƫƤ ƝƘƞƘȹơƜƦơ; L Ts.l. 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 829–30 ƢʬƤ ƖȮƣ – ƞƔƦƣƘƒƔƟ 2 ƝƘƞƘƯơƜƦơ] de ǂƟ omittendo vide ad sch. El. 1253.1

μƚƝƐƦƜ] μȲ T

192

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

831a ƘǮ Ɩȯƣ ƥƨƘ žƘƟƦƔȹƣơƧ : ƘǮ ƖȮƣ ƔȎƦȷƟ, ƦȶƟ ǧƣƔƝƞȱƔ, Ʀȶ ƔǵμƔ Ʀȶ ƛƔƟȯƥƜμơƟ Ʀơʝ žƘƟƦƔȹƣơƧ ƢƘƣƜȱƩƘƜ, ƢƞƘƧƣɲ ƢƣơƥƦƔƝȱƟƦơƤ Ǯơʝ, ƢʬƤ ǀƟ ǓƦƘƣơƟ ǣƞƜơƟ Ǡ ƦȮ ƟʝƟ DzƗơƜ; L T 1 lm. deest in T; annotationem ad nominativum ƨơƜƟƒƔ ƟƘƨƐƞƔ spectare vidit Wolff 233; cf. etiam sch. 831b; accuratiss. vv. 831–5 ƘǮ Ɩȯƣ ƥƨƘ – DzƗơƜ 2 ƢƞƘƧƣɲ] ƦȮ ƢƞƘƧƣȮ T Ǯơʝ] Ʀơʝ Ǯơʝ T

831b (ƨơƜƟȵƔ ƟƘƨȱƞƔ): Ʀȶ ƔǵμƔ Ʀȶ ƛƔƟȯƥƜμơƟ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

831–2 (ƨơƜƟƒɯ ƟƘƨƐƞɯ |) ƩƣȵƘƜ ƗơƞơƢơƜȷƤ (ƾƟƏƖƝƔ): ƩƣȵƘƜ ƗȰ Ʀȶ ǯμȯƦƜơƟ Ʀʭ ƔdzμƔƦƜ ǟ ƾƟȯƖƝƚ ƦʀƤ ŸƚƜƔƟƘȵƣƔƤ ǟ μƘƦȮ ƗȷƞơƧ ƦƘƩƟƚƥƔμȱƟƚ. ǞƟȯƖƝƔƥƦƔƜ ƖȮƣ ȏƢȶ ƙȳƞơƧ ƗƜŪ ơȕ ǢƣƔ Ʀʭ Ɨȷƞʪ ƦơʝƦơ ƦƘƩƟƏƥƔƥƛƔƜ. L T 1 lm. L supplevi: deest in T; auctorem huius scholii dativum ƨơƜƟƒɯ ƟƘƨƐƞɯ habuisse collegit Wolff 232; accuratiss. v. 831–2 ƨơƜƟƒɯ ƟƘƨƐƞɯ – ƾƟƏƖƝƔ post ƗȰ add. ƞƐƖƘƜ T 2 ƦʀƤ] ȟƤ ƦʀƤ T ǟ (alt.) Lp (Lascaris): Ǡ L: om. T post ƦƘƩƟƚƥƔμȱƟƚ add. ƦơʝƦơ T 3 Ʀʭ Ɨȷƞʪ] ƦȶƟ ƗƮƞơƟ T ƦơʝƦơ Lascaris: ƦơƧ L: om. T ƦƘƩƟƏƥƔƥƛƔƜ L (cf. sch. 973 ƦƘƩƟƏƥơμƔƜ, sch. Eur. Phoen. 1606 … ǎƦƘƩƟƏƥƔƦơ ...): ƦƘƩƟȳƥƔƥƛƔƜ T

834a ȁƟ ƦȱƝƘƦơ ƛȯƟƔƦơƤ : ƦơʝƦơƟ, ƦȶƟ ǮȷƟ, ǎƖȱƟƟƚƥƘƟ ǿ ƔǮȷƞơƤ ƗƣȯƝƫƟ, μɱƞƞơƟ ƗȰ ǿ ƛȯƟƔƦơƤ. L 1 lm. accuratiss. v. 834 ȁƟ ƦȱƝƘƦơ – ƗƣƏƝƫƟ

834b (ƗƣȯƝƫƟ): ǟ ȓƗƣƔ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley ante ǟ add. ƦơƧƦƐƥƦƜƟ T

sch. 831a – sch. 837–8

193

835 (ƾȱƞƜơƟ): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǟμȱƣƔƟ. Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

836–7 (ȓƗƣƔƤ) | ƢƣơƥƦƘƦƔƝȺƤ ƨȯƥμƔƦƜ : ƢƣơƥƝƘƝơƞƞƚμȱƟơƤ Ʀʭ Ǯʭ ƦʀƤ ȓƗƣƔƤ. ƦơʝƦơ ƗȰ ƝƔƛŪ ǏƔƧƦȷ, ƔǮƦƜƔƦƜƝȲƟ ƖȮƣ ǎƢƜƨȱƣƘƜ. ǂƞƞƫƤŭ ƢƣơƥƝƘƝơƞƞƚμȱƟơƤ Ʀʭ Ǯʭ Ǡ Ʀʭ ǾƞƘƛƣƒʪ, ƢƔƣȮ Ʀȶ ƢƘƨơƟƘʝƥƛƔƜ. L T 2 ƦơʝƦơ ƗȰ ƝƔƛŪ ǏƔƧƦƮ: i.e. scholiasta ƢƣơƥƦƘƦƔƝưƤ cum ǀƟ … DzƗơƜ, non cum ƔǮƝƒƙƘƜ construit ƔǮƦƜƔƦƜƝȲƟ ƖȮƣ ǎƢƜƨƐƣƘƜ: vide v. 838 ƟƜƟ ƔǮƝƒƙƘƜ 1 lm. L supplevi: ƢƣơƥƦƘƦƔƝȺƤ ƗȰ T, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 831–2 copulet ƢƣơƥƝƘƝơƞƞƚμƐƟơƤ] ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ Ƣƣ. T 2 ǂƞƞƫƤ om. T 3 Ǡ del. Papageorgiou qui Ʀʭ ǾƞƘƛƣƒʪ pro adiectivo accepit Ʀʭ ǾƞƘƛƣƒʪ] Ʀʭ ǾƞƐƛƣʪ Hermann 144 prob. Wunder3 71, sed Ʀʭ ǾƞƘƛƣƒʪ neutrum est adiectivi pro substativo dictum ƢƔƣȮ Ʀȶ ƢƘƨơƟƘʝƥƛƔƜ (i.e. etymon vocis ƨƏƥμƔ)] ƢƔƣȮ Ʀȶ ƢƘƨơƟƘʝƥƛƔƜ Scaliger 360 et Hermann l.c. prob. Wunder3 l.c. et Zielinski 55

837 ƨȯƥμƔƦƜ, ƦơƧƦȱƥƦƜ Ʀʭ ǯμƔƦȵʪ Ʀʭ ƝƘƩƣƜƥμȱƟʪ Ʀʭ ƨƔƣμȯƝʪ ƦʀƤ ȓƗƣƔƤ, ƦơƧƦȱƥƦƜ Ʀʁ Ʃơƞʁ. L T 1–2 haec a sch. 836–7 separavi praeeunte Dindorf 73 ƨƏƥμƔƦƜ] ȏƨƏƥμƔƦƜ coni. Schneider in Lexico Gr. prob. Hermann 144, Wunder3 71 et Zielinski 55 2 ƦơƧƦȱƥƦƜ] ǢƖơƧƟ T

837–8 μƘƞƔƖƩƔȵƦƔ ƦŪ | ǂμμƜƖƔ : Ʀơʝ ƗƔƥƧƦƣȵƩơƧŭ ƝƔȴ ǃμƔ Ʀʭ ƨȯƥμƔƦƜ ƦʀƤ ȓƗƣƔƤ ƝƔȴ ƦȮ ƝȱƟƦƣƔ Ʀơʝ ƁȱƥƥơƧ ƔǮƝȵƙƘƜ ƔȎƦȷƟ. L T; cf. etiam gl. in Ts.l. 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 838–40 μƘƞƔƖƩƔȵƦƔ – ƝƐƟƦƣ' margine sed praebuit ut gl. ad μƘƞƔƖƩƔƒƦƔ T

Ʀơʝ ƗƔƥƧƦƣȵƩơƧ om. in

194

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

839–40 (ƨơƒƟƜƔ … ƝƐƟƦƣŪ ): ƗʀƞơƟ [ƗȰ] ȃƦƜ ƨơƒƟƜƔ ƦȮ ƝƐƟƦƣƔ Ʀơʝ ƁƐƥƥơƧŭ ƞȱƖƘƜ ƗȰ Ʀȶ ƔǵμƔ ƔȎƦơʝ ƥƧμμƘμƜƖμȱƟơƟ Ʀʁ Ʃơƞʁ ƦʀƤ ȓƗƣƔƤ. L T 1–2 haec a sch. pr. separavi; scholiastae verba poetae ƁƐƥƥơƧ ƛŪ ȓƢơ defuisse conicias 1 lm. addidi ƗȰ delevi ƨơƒƟƜƔ] ƨƮƟƜƔ T (Lascaris) ƨơƒƟƜƔ ƦȮ ƝƐƟƦƣƔ] ƨơƒƟƜƔ ƝƐƟƦƣƔ ƦȮ Wansink 108 2 ƁƐƥƥơƧ TLp (Lascaris): ƟƮƥơƧ L

840a ƗơƞȷμƧƛƔ : ȃƦƜ ƦơʎƤ ƗơƞȵơƜƤ Ʀơʝ ƁȱƥƥơƧ ƞȷƖơƜƤ ƾƢƔƦƚƛƘʎƥƔ ƦƘƦȷƞμƚƝƘƟ. L T 1 hoc sch. cum sch. 839–40 c. in T (ƗơƞƮμƧƛƔ ƗȰ ƝƐƟƦƣƔ ƨƚƥƒƟ) ƦƔʝƦƔ Ʀ. T

2 ƦƘƦȷƞμƚƝƘƟ]

840b ƗơƞƮμƧƛƔ ƝƐƟƦƣƔ ƦȮ ƗƮƞƜƔ ƨƏƣμƔƝƔŭ ƝƔȴ ƖȮƣ ǓƦƘƣȯ ƦƜƟƔ ǎƝȱƞƘƧƥƘƟ ƔȎƦʁ ƥƧμμʎƠƔƜ Ʀʭ ƔdzμƔƦƜ ȟƤ ǾƢȵƥƫ ƘǴƢƘƟ. L T 2 ǾƢȵƥƫ: vv. 580–1 1–2 haec cum sch. pr. coniuncta (ǂƞƞƫƤ L: sine verbo coniunctivo T) separavi sch. ita reformavit T cum sch. pr. coniungens: ƘǴƢƘ ƖȮƣ ƔȎƦʁ ƝƔȴ ǓƦƘƣƏ ƦƜƟƔ ƥƧμμƒƠƔƜ Ʀʭ ƔdzμƔƦƜ 1 ƗơƞƮμƧƛƔ ƝƐƟƦƣƔ scripsi: ƨơƒƟƜƔ ƗơƞƮμƧƛƔ L

840c (ǎƢƜƙȱƥƔƟƦƔ): ǎƢƜƩƧƛȱƟƦƔ, ƾƟƔƝƔƩƞȯƥƔƟƦƔ ǎƝ ƦʀƤ ƛȱƣμƚƤ Ʀơʝ ƢƧƣȷƤ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris; (ǎƢƜƙƐƥƔƟƦƔ s.) L

841a ȥƟ ǃƗŪ ƿ ƦƞȯμƫƟ : ȥƟ ƦȲƟ ƕƞȯƕƚƟ ǿƣʬƥƔ ǟ ŸƚƜȯƟƘƜƣƔ ƦơʎƤ ơDzƝơƜƤ ƥƧμƕɱƥƔƟ ƔȎƦȲƟ μȰƟ ǎƠ ƾƣƩʀƤ ơȎ ƥƧƟƘʎƗƘƟ, ǎƝ ƝƔƦƔƥƝƘƧʀƤ ƗȰ ƦʀƤ ƁȱƥƥơƧ ƝƔȴ ƦʀƤ ƦơȹƦơƧ ƨƫƟʀƤ ƖƘƟơμȱƟƚƟ ȟƤ ƗʀƛƘƟ ǎƢȴ Ʀʭ ƗƜƔƞƞȯƦƦƘƜƟ ƔȎƦʁ ƦȶƟ ǧƣƔƝƞȱƔ ƞȵƔƟ ǾƗȹƣƘƦƔƜ ƝƔȴ ƥƦȱƟƘƜ. L T 2 ơȎ ƥƧƟƘʎƗƘƟ: cf. sch. 843

sch. 839–40 – sch. 843

195

1 lm. deest in T; ƕƞƏƕƚƟ ... ƥƧμƕɱƥƔƟ (1–2) ad ƕƞƏƕƔƟ ... ƾƒƥƥơƧƥƔƟ et ƖƘƟơμƐƟƚƟ (3) ad μơƞơʝƥƔƟ spectare conieci; accuratiss. vv. 841–6 ȥƟ ǃƗŪ – ƥƦƐƟƘƜ ȥƟ] ƦơƯƦƫƟ T ƕƞƏƕƚƟ] ƕ. ƨƚƥȴ μƘƖƏƞƚƟ T 1–2 ŸƚƜƏƟƘƜƣƔ ƦơʎƤ ơDzƝơƜƤ ƥƧμƕɱƥƔƟ] Ÿ. ƝƔȴ ƦƔƩƘʎƔƟ ƥƧμƕƑƥƘƥƛƔƜ ƦơʎƤ ƗƮμơƜƤ T 2 ƔȎƦȲƟ ... ơȎ ƥƧƟƘʎƗƘƟ] ƔȎƦȲ ... ơȎƝ ƘǴƗƘƟ T 2–3 ƦʀƤ NƐƥơƧ L: Ʀơʝ ƁƐƥơƧ Ƈ 3 ƦơƯƦơƧ] ƔȎƦơʝ T ǎƢȴ Ʀʭ Stephanus 361: ǎƢȴ Ʀȶ L: om. T

841b ǂơƝƟơƟ [ƗȰ] ƦȲƟ ǾƠƘʎƔƟ ƝƔȴ ƾμȱƞƞƚƦơƟŭ Ǡ ƢơƞȹơƝƟơƟ, ȃ ǎƥƦƜ ƢơƞȹƨơƕơƟ, ƝƔƦŪ ǎƢȵƦƔƥƜƟ ƗȰ Ʀȶ Ɣ. L; cf. gl. in Ts.l. 1–2 haec a sch. 841–5 separavi

1 ƗȰ delevi ǾƠƘʎƔƟ ut gl. ad ǂơƝƟơƟ praebet T

841–5 (ȥƟ – ƥƧƟƔƞƞƔƖƔʎƤ): ȥƟ, ƦʬƟ ƟƘƫƥƦȴ ƗƣƫμȱƟƫƟ ƥƧμƕȯƟƦƫƟ ƝƔƝʬƟ, ƦȲƟ ƾμȱƞƞƚƦơƟ ƕƞȯƕƚƟ ǿƣʬƥƔ ƥƧμƕɱƥƔƟ ƦơʎƤ ơDzƝơƜƤ ŸƚƜȯƟƘƜƣƔ ƦȮ ƝƔƝȮ μȰƟ ǎƠ ƾƣƩʀƤ ƔȎƦȲ ơȎ ƥƧƟƘʎƗƘƟ, ƾƢȶ ƖƟȻμƚƤ ƗȰ ǏƦȱƣƔƤ, Ʀơʝ ƁȱƥƥơƧ, ƖƘƟȷμƘƟƔ ȟƤ ƗʀƛƘƟ ǎƢȴ Ʀʭ ƗƜƔƞƞȯƦƦƘƜƟ ƦȶƟ 5 ǧƣƔƝƞȱƔ. L 1–5 haec sch. 841a uno tenore excipiunt in L (ǂƞƞƫƤ) 1 lm. addidi; scholiastam ƾƒƥƥơƧƥƔƟ pro ƾƜƥƥƮƟƦƫƟ habuisse conieci ego et ƝƔƝʬƟ pro ƖƏμƫƟ coniecit Wolff 138 ƝƔȴ add. Wolff 58 3 ƔȎƦȲ Brunck1: ƔȓƦȲ duobus accentibus L 4 ǎƢȴ Ʀʭ Stephanus 361: ǎƢȴ Ʀȶ L

842 (ƟȱƫƟ ƾƜƥƥȷƟƦƫƟ): ƟƘƫƥƦȴ ƢƣơƥƕƔƞƞȷƟƦƫƟ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris (nisi quod ƟƐơƟ pro ƟƐƫƟ scripsit); (ƟƐƫƟ s.) L

843 (ơȒ ƦƜ ƢƣơƥȱƕƔƞƘƟ): ơȎƝ ǒƖƟƫ, ơȎ ƥƧƟʀƝƘƟ. Ls.l. Ts.l. cf. sch. 841a.2 ubi ơȒƦƜ ƢƣơƥƐƕƔƞƘƟ per ơȎ ƥƧƟƘʎƗƘƟ explicatur 1 lm. add. Lascaris

196

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

844a ƦȮ ƗŪ ƾƢŪ ƾƞƞơƛƣȷơƧ : ƾƞƞơƨȻƟơƧ, ȃƦƜ ƾƢȶ ƦʀƤ ƁȱƥƥơƧ ƨƫƟʀƤ ƖȱƖơƟƘƟ ǟ ƝƔƦȮ ǧƣƔƝƞȱƔ ƥƧμƨơƣȯ. L T 1 ƾƞƞơƨưƟơƧ: Hesych. Ɣ 3144 ƾƞƞơƛƣȷơƧƤ· ƾƞƞơƨȻƟơƧƤ (Ɣ 183) = Ɔ Ɣ 326 = Phot. Ɣ 999 = Su. Ɣ 1322; sch. Hom. Od. 1.183g ƾƞƞơƛƣƮơƧƤ ƾƟƛƣưƢơƧƤ: ‘ƾƞƞơƛƣƮơƧƤ’ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƾƞƞơƖƞȻƥƥơƧƤ... 1 lm.] ƾƞƞơƛƣƮơƧ T ƾƞƞơƨưƟơƧ] ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƾƞ. T

2 ǧƣƔƝƞƐƔ] Ʀơʝ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ T

844b (ƾƞƞơƛƣƮơƧ): ơǵơƟ ƦʀƤ ǂƞƞƔ ƘǮƢơȹƥƚƤ ƝƔȴ ơȎ ƦȮ ƾƞƚƛʀŭ Ǡ ƾƞƞơƨȻƟơƧ ȟƤ ǞƞƞƔƖμȱƟƚƟ Ʀơʝ ƁȱƥƥơƧ ƨƫƟȲƟ ǒƩơƟƦơƤ. L T 2 ƾƞƞơƨưƟơƧ: vide ad sch. 844a.1 1–2 haec a sch. 844a separavi 1 lm. addidi ơǵơƟ – ƾƞƚƛʀ] Ǡ ȟƤ ǂƞƞƔ ƘǮƢơƯƥƚƤ ƝƔȴ μȲ ƦȮ ƾƞƚƛʀ ƦʀƤ ŸƚƜƔƟƘƒƣƔƤ T 1–2 Ǡ – fin.] Ǡ ȟƤ ǎƟƚƞƞƔƖμƐƟƚƤ ƦʀƤ ƨƫƟʀƤ Ʀơʝ ƁƐƥơƧ T

844c (ƾƢŪ ƾƞƞơƛƣƮơƧ): ƾƢȶ Ʀơʝ ƁȱƥƥơƧ. L 1 lm. add. Elmsley

845 ǾƞƘƛƣȵƔƜƤ ƠƧƟƔƞƞƔƖƔʎƤ : Ǡ ǾƞƘƛƣȵƔƜƤ ƝƔȴ ǎƢƜƕƞƔƕȱƥƜ ƨƜƞȵƔƜƤ Ǡ ǎƢƘȴ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǮƗȵơƧ ƛƔƟȯƦơƧ ƁȱƥƥơƤ ƾƟƦȳƞƞƔƠƘƟ ƔȎƦʁ Ʀȶ ƔǵμƔŭ Ǡ ȃƦƜ ǿ μȰƟ ƁȱƥƥơƤ ƘǴƢƘƟ ƔȎƦʁ ƢȷƛơƧ ƝƔȴ ƗƜƔƞƞƔƖʀƤ ǎƣƖƔƥƦȳƣƜơƟ ƘǴƟƔƜ Ʀȶ ƨȯƣμƔƝơƟ, ƖȱƖơƟƘ ƗȰ ȂƞƘƛƣơƤ ǧƣƔƝƞȱơƧƤ. L T 1 ƨƜƞƒƔƜƤ: cf. sch. OT 34 ubi ƥƧƟƔƞƞƔƖƔʎƤ per ƝơƜƟƫƟƒƔƜƤ ƝƔȴ ƨƜƞƒƔƜƤ explanatur et ibid. 960 3 ƗƜƔƞƞƔƖʀƤ: cf. sch. Ai. 732 Papageorgiou ǎƟ ƠƧƟƔƞƞƔƖʁ ƞƮƖơƧ] Ʀʁ ƾμơƜƕʁ Ʀơʝ ƞƮƖơƧ ƝƔȴ ƥƧμƕƜƕƏƥƘƜ 1–4 haec rescripsit et cum sch. 844b coniunxit T: ǿ μȰƟ ƖȮƣ ƘǴƢƘƟ ƔȎƦʁ ƢƮƛơƧ ƝƔȴ ƗƜƔƞƞƔƖʀƤ ƘǴƟƔƜ ǎƟƘƣƖȮ ƦȮ ƨƏƣμƔƦƔ, ƦȮ ƗȰ ƖƐƖơƟƘƟ ȂƞƘƛƣơƤ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ. ƥƧƟƔƞƞƔƖƔʎƤ ƗȰ Ǡ ƨƜƞƒƔƜƤ Ǡ ƗƜƮƦƜ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǮƗƒơƧ ƛƔƟƏƦơƧ ƁƐƥơƤ ƾƟƦƚƞƞƏƠƔƦơ ƝƔȴ ƾƟƦƐƗƫƝƘƟ ƔȎƦʁ Ʀȶ ƔǵμƔ 2 post ƛƔƟƏƦơƧ add. ǿ Lp (Lascaris) ƾƟƦƑƞƞƔƠƘƟ] ƾƟƦƚƞƞƏƠƔƦơ ƝƔȴ ƾƟƦƐƗƫƝƘƟ T

sch. 844a – sch. 848a

197

846a Ǥ ƢơƧ ǾƞơȮ ƥƦƐƟƘƜ : ȂƟƦƫƤ ƗȲ ǟ ƾƛƞȵƔ ƝƔƦƔƥƦȯƙƘƜ ƝƔȴ ƝƔƦƔƕƣȱƩƘƜ ƢơƞƞʬƟ ƗƔƝƣȹƫƟ ƾƨƣȷƟŭ ǎμƨƔƟƦƜƝȶƟ ƗȰ Ʀȶ ǂƩƟƔ ƗƜȮ Ʀȶ ƢƞʀƛơƤ. L T 1 ǂƩƟƚ per ƾƨƣƮƤ explicatur in sch. 848b; sch. Hom. Il. 15.625–6b; id. Od. 5.403; Apion 226, 9 L. 1 lm. deest in T

2 ƗȰ T (Lascaris): om. L

846b ǾƞơƏ : ǟ ƗƧƥƦƧƩȲƤ Ǡ ǟ Ʀơʝ ǾƞȱƥƛƔƜ ƾƠȵƔ. L T 1 lm. deest in L; (ǾƞơƏ s.) L

847a (ƾƗƜƟʬƟ): ƾƛƣȷƫƟ Ǡ ƢơƞƧƛƣƚƟȳƦƫƟ. L 1 ƾƛƣƮƫƟ: cf. e.g. sch. Hom. Il. 2.469b ƿƗƜƟƏƫƟ: ƿƛƣƮƫƤ ǯƢƦƔμƐƟƫƟ; sch. D Hom. Il. 2.87 ƾƗƜƟƏƫƟ: ƦʬƟ ǃƗƚƟ ƝƔȴ ƾƛƣƮƫƤ ƢƘƦơμƐƟƫƟ; ibid. 2.469 ƿƗƜƟƏƫƟ: ƾƛƣƮƫƤ ƢƘƦơμƐƟƫƟ; Apollon. S. 8, 30–1 ... Ǡ ƦʬƟ ƾƛƣȷƫƟ ƝƔȴ ƢơƞƞʬƟ (scil. ƾƗƜƟƏƫƟ)...; Hesych. Ɣ 1138 ƿƗƜƟƏƫƟŭ ƾƛƣƮƫƟ… 1 lm. add. Brunck2; (ƾƗƜƟʬƟ s.) L

847b ƩƞƫƣȮƟ [ơȔƟ] ǂƩƟƔƟ ƦȶƟ ƟƘƔƣȶƟ ƾƨƣƮƟ. L T 1 ƾƨƣƮƟ: vide locos similes ad sch. 846a allatos ƟƘƔƣƮƟ: cf. sch. 1055b; sch. Hom. Il. 11.631a ƩƞƫƣƮƟ: … ƟƐơƟ; sch. D Hom. Il. 7.479 ƩƞƫƣƮƟ: Ʀȶ ƟƐơƟ; ibid. 11.630 1 haec a sch. 846a deleto ơȔƟ seiunxi

848a (ƗƔƝƣȹƫƟ ǂƩƟƔƟ): ƢƘƣƜƨƣƔƥƦƜƝʬƤ ƦȮ ƗȯƝƣƧƔ. L T 1 hoc sch. cum sch. 847b conectit T (ƢƘƣƜƨƣƔƥƦƜƝʬƤ ƗȰ) lm. add. Lascaris

198

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

848b (ǂƩƟƔƟ): ƦȶƟ ƾƨƣȷƟ. Ls.l. vide locos similes ad sch. 846a congestos 1 lm. add. Elmsley

849a ƿ ƗŪ ǎƣƩơμȱƟƔ μơʎƣƔ : ǟ ƢƣơƥƗơƝƫμȱƟƚ ƝƔƝơμơƜƣȵƔ Ʀơʝ ǧƣƔƝƞȱơƧƤ ǎμƨƔȵƟƘƜ μƘƖȯƞƚƟ ǏƦȱƣƔƟ ǂƦƚƟŭ ƢƣơƥƗơƝʬƥƜ ƗȰ ȃƦƜ ƾƢơƞƞƧμȱƟơƧ ǧƣƔƝƞȱơƧƤ ƔȎƦȷƩƘƜƣ ǏƔƧƦʀƤ ƖƘƟȳƥƘƦƔƜ. L T 1 lm.] ǟ ǎƣƩơμƐƟƚ T; accuratiss. vv. 849–50 ƿ ƗŪ ǎƣƩơμƐƟƔ – ǂƦƔƟ ƢƣơƥƗơƝƫμƐƟƚ] Ƣƣ., ƨƚƥƒ, T ƝƔƝơμơƜƣƒƔ] ƝƔƝȲ μơʎƣƔ T 2 ǂƦƚƟ] ǂƦ. ƝƔȴ ƕƞƏƕƚƟ T 3 ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ] Ʀơʝ ǧƣ. T ǏƔƧƦʀƤ] ƝƔȴ ƔȎƦȲ T

849b (ƗơƞȵƔƟ): Ɨȷƞʪ ƖȮƣ ƔȏƦȲƟ ƝƔȴ ƞȯƛƣɯ ƾƟƔƜƣȳƥƘƜ. L 1 lm. add. Brunck2

ƔƧƦȲƟ cum spiritu incerto in L

851 ǒƣƣƫƖƘƟ ƢƔƖȯ : ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƢȯƣƘƥƦƜƟ ǟμʎƟ ƗƔƝƣȹƘƜƟ ȟƤ ƾƢȶ ƢƚƖʀƤ ƝƣơƧƟƚƗȷƟŭ ǎƝƦȱƦƔƦƔƜ ƖȮƣ Ʀȶ ƝƔƝȶƟ ƝƔȴ ƢƔƟƦƔƩơʝ ƗƜƔƕȳƥƘƦƔƜ ǟ ƝƔƦȮ ƦȶƟ ǧƣƔƝƞȱƔ ƥƧμƨơƣȯ. L T 1 lm. deest in Ƈ; accuratiss. vv. 851–2 ǒƣƣƫƖƘƟ – ƟƮƥơƤ ƨƚƥƒ, T 3 ƥƧμƨơƣƏ] ƟƮƥơƤ Ƈ

ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ om. Ƈ

ǟμʎƟ] ǟμʎƟ,

852 Ȥ ƢȷƢơƜ : ƨƘʝ, ƨƘʝ, ƝƔƝȷƟ, ƨƚƥȵ, ƖȱƖơƟƘ Ʀʭ ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ ơǵơƟ ơȎƗȰ ƢƔƣȮ ƦơʎƤ ƢơƞƘμȵơƜƤ ƾƟơȵƝƦƜƥƦơƟ ƥƜƫƢƚƛȳƥƘƦƔƜŭ Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ ơȒƢƫ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ơȎƩȵ. Ǡ ơȓƦƫƤŭ ơǵơƟ ƝƔƝȷƟ, ƨƚƥȵƟ, ơȎƗȱƢơƦƘ ȏƢȶ ƦʬƟ ǎƩƛƣʬƟ ƥƧƟȱƕƚ Ʀʭ ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ, ƦơʝƦơ ƾƢȶ ƦʬƟ ǮƗȵƫƟ ƔȎƦʭ ƖƘƖȱƟƚƦƔƜ. L T; cf. etiam gl. in Ts.l. 2 ƢơƞƘμƒơƜƤ: cf. sch. 855; sch. Arat. 125 …ƾƟƏƣƥƜơƟ ƗȰ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƢơƞƐμƜơƟ…; Apollon. S. 32, 10; Hesych Ɣ 4562; Phot. Ɣ 2840 2–3 Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ – ơȎƩƒ: cf. sch. Hom. Il. 14.143a ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ơȎƗŪ ȃƞƫƤ…; ibid. 14.143b; 18.513a; ibid. 24.411 3 ǎƩƛƣʬƟ: vide locos similes ad sch. 640–3 allatos

199

sch. 848b – sch. 856c

1–3 ƨƘʝ – ơȓƦƫƤ om. Ƈ in margine, sed ƨƘʝ, ƨƘʝ praebuit ut gl. ad Ȥ ƢƮƢơƜ 1 lm. ex L: deest in Ƈ (vide 1–3); accuratiss. vv. 852–5 Ȥ ƢȷƢơƜ – ơǮƝƦƒƥƔƜ; 3 ơǵơƟ – fin. ita retractavit Ƈ: ơǵơƟ ƝƔƝȶƟ ƖƐƖơƟƘ Ʀʭ ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ ơȎƗƐƢƫ ȏƢȶ ƦʬƟ ǎƩƛƣʬƟ, ƦơʝƦơ ȏƢȶ ƦʬƟ ǮƗƒƫƟ ƖƘƖƐƟƚƦƔƜ 4 ƾƢȶ] ȏƢȶ Bernardakis 61

855 ƾƢȱμơƞƘ ƢȯƛơƤ : ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƾƢơμȷƞơƜ, ơǵơƟ ơȎƗȱƢơƦƘ ƾƢȶ ƦʬƟ ƢơƞƘμȵƫƟ ƖȱƟơƜƦơ. L 2 ƢơƞƘμƒƫƟ: vide ad sch. pr. 1–2 grammaticus ƾƢƐμơƞƘ cum ƾƟƔƣƥƒƫƟ construxit

856a ǮȺ ƝƘƞƔƜƟȮ ƞȷƖƩƔ : ƝƘƞƔƜƟȲƟ ƘǴƢƘƟ ƦȲƟ ƞȷƖƩƚƟ ƗƜȮ ƦȶƟ ǎƠ ƔȎƦʀƤ ƾƢơƦƘƞơȹμƘƟơƟ ƛȯƟƔƦơƟ, μȱƞƔƤ ƗȰ ǿ ƛȯƟƔƦơƤ. ƗƧƥƨơƣƘʎ ƗȰ ǎƢȴ Ʀʭ ƔǮƩμȯƞƫƦơƟ ƘǮƞʀƨƛƔƜ ƦȲƟ ǶȷƞƚƟŭ ƗƜȮ ƖȮƣ ƦƔȹƦƚƟ ǟ ƥƧμƨơƣȯ. L T 1 lm. deest in Ƈ; accuratiss. vv. 856–9 Ǯư – ƔǮƩμɲ 3 ƘǮƞʀƨƛƔƜ] ƘǮƞƚƨƐƟƔƜ Ƈ

2 ƗƐ (pr.)] ƖȮƣ ƝƔȴ Ƈ

856b ƞȷƖƩƔ [ƗȰ] ƗơƣƮƤ ƢƘƣƜƨƣƔƥƦƜƝʬƤ Ʀȶ ƗƮƣƧ. L T 1 haec a sch. pr. separavi codd.

ƗȰ delevi

ƞƮƖƩƔ] ƞƮƖƩƚ T

Ʀȶ ƗƮƣƧ scripsi: ǟ ƞƮƖƩƚ

856c ƢƣơμȯƩơƧ [ƗȰ] Ʀơʝ ƢƣơƕƘƕƞƚμȱƟơƧ. Ʀȶ ƗȰ ƞȷƖƩƔ ƢƣȶƤ Ʀȶ ƔǮƩμɲ. L 1 ƢƣơμƏƩơƧ ƗȰ Ʀơʝ ƢƣơƕƘƕƞƚμƐƟơƧ: de Hercule accepit sch. 856d 1 haec a sch. pr. separavi ƗȰ delevi ƔǮƩμɲ Heath 81: ƔǵμƔ L

200

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

856d ƢƣơμȯƩơƧ [ƗơƣȷƤ]: Ʀȶ ƢƣơμȯƩơƧ ǎƢȴ Ʀơʝ ǧƣƔƝƞȱơƧƤ ƞƚƢƦȱơƟ, ơǵơƟ Ʀơʝ Ƣƣȶ ƢȯƟƦƫƟ μƔƩơμȱƟơƧ. Ʀȶ ƟȹμƨƔƟ ƗȰ ƥƧƟƔƢƦȱơƟ Ʀʭ ƦȯƟƗƘ. L; cf. gll. in Ts.l. 1 Ʀȶ – 2 μƔƩơμƐƟơƧ: aliter sch. 856c quod ƢƣơμƏƩơƧ cum ƗơƣƮƤ coniunxit 1 lm. L decurtavi Ʀȶ ƢƣơμȯƩơƧ – 2 μƔƩơμƐƟơƧ] Ʀơʝ Ƣƣȶ ƢƏƟƦƫƟ μƔƩơμƐƟơƧ et Ʀơʝ ǧƣƔƝƞƐơƧƤ gll. ad Ʀơʝ ƢƣơμƏƩơƧ nec plura T 2 Ʀȶ ƟƯμƨƔƟ – fin.] ƦƏƟƗƘŭ ǎƟƦƔʝƛƔ ƖȮƣ ƥƧƟƏƢƦƘƦƔƜ gl. ad ƟƯμƨƔƟ nec plura T ƦƏƟƗƘ TLp (Lascaris): ƦɱƟƗƘ L

856–9a1 (Ȥ ƝƘƞƔƜƟƏ – ƔǮƩμɲ ): ǿ [ƗȰ] ƞȷƖơƤŭ Ȥ ƛƔƟƔƦơƢơƜȰ ƞȷƖƩƚ ǣƦƜƤ ƦȷƦƘ ƾƟƘƞơʝƥƔ ƦȶƟ ŹȒƣƧƦơƟ ǎƟƦƔʝƛƔ ƦȲƟ ǶȷƞƚƟ ǢƖƔƖƘƤ ǎƝ ƦʀƤ ȏƪƚƞʀƤ ƃǮƩƔƞȵƔƤ ȟƤ ƘDzƛƘ μȳƢơƦƘ. L T 2 ȏƪƚƞʀƤ : cf. sch. Eur. Andr. 103 ubi ƔǮƢƘƜƟɲ per ȏƪƚƞʁ explicatur; sch. D Hom. Il. 2.573; ibid. 6.35a; ibid. 15.558; sch. Pi. P. 4.135; id. O. 9.161b; Hesych. Ɣ 2046 ƔǮƢƘƜƟȷƟ· ȏƪƚƞȷƟ (ƃ 257); Su. ƔƜ 269 1–3 haec a sch. 856c separavi 1 lm. addidi; scholiastam Ȥ pro Ǯư legisse conieci ƗȰ delevi ǿ ƗȰ ƞƮƖơƤ L: ƝƔȴ ǒƥƦƜƟ ǿ ƞƮƖơƤ ơȓƦƫƤ T 2 ǢƖƔƖƘƤ] ƾƢƐƢƘμƪƔƤ T 3 ȟƤ – fin. om. T

856–9a2 (ǮȺ ƝƘƞƔƜƟƏ – ƔǮƩμɲ ): ƦơƧƦȱƥƦƜ ƨƘʝ ƦʀƤ ƞȷƖƩƚƤ ǎƝƘȵƟƚƤ ǎƟ ɓ ǎƢȷƣƛƚƥƘ ƦȲƟ ƃǮƩƔƞȵƔƟ ǿ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ, dzƟƔ ǎƟȱƖƝɾ ƦȲƟ ǶȷƞƚƟŭ ƗƜȮ ƖȮƣ ƦƔȹƦƚƟ ǟ ƥƧμƨơƣȮ ǎƖȱƟƘƦơ. Ʀȶ ƗȰ ǂƣƛƣơƟ Ʀʭ ƞȷƖƩƚ ƥƧƟƔƢƦȱơƟ, ǣƦƜƤ ƞȷƖƩƚ. L 1–4 haec a sch. pr. separavi 1 lm. addidi ǃƢƘƣ ơȎƝ ǤƟ ǮɱƥƛƔƜ ơȎƗȰ ǎƟ ƛƔƟƏƦʪ

ǎƟ del. Bernardakis, sed cf. sch. OT 1374

857 (ƛơƏƟ): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƛơʬƤŭ ƦƜƟȰƤ ƗȰ ƦȲƟ ƦƔƩȱƫƤ ƟƧμƨƘƧƛƘʎƥƔƟ. L 1 lm add. Brunck2

sch. 856d – sch. 863

201

858 (ƔǮƢƘƜƟɱƤ): ǎƟ ȓƪƘƜ ƝƘƜμȱƟƚƤ. L cf. sch. D Hom. Il. 6.35b ƔǮƢƘƜƟƑƟ: ǎƟ ȓƪƘƜ ƝƘƜμƐƟƚƟ et locos similes ad sch. 856–9a1 allatos 1 lm. add. Elmsley ƝƘƜμƐƟƚƤ Lascaris: ƝƘƜμƐƟƚƟ L

859 (ƔǮƩμɲ ): Ɵȷμʪ ƢơƞȱμơƧ. L 1 lm. add. Lascaris; (ƔǮƩμɲ s.) L

860a ƿ ƗŪ ƾμƨȵƢơƞơƤ žȹƢƣƜƤ : ǿ ƟơʝƤŭ ǟ ƗȰ žȹƢƣƜƤ ǤƟ ǂƣƔ ƨƔƟƘƣʬƤ ǟ ƢȯƟƦƫƟ ƦơȹƦƫƟ ǎƣƖȯƦƜƤ ƘǮƤ ǒƣƫƦƔ ǶȷƞƚƤ ƕƔƞơʝƥƔ ƦȶƟ ǧƣƔƝƞȱƔ. L 1 lm. accuratiss. vv. 860–1 ƿ ƗŪ – ƢƣƏƝƦƫƣ

860b (ƾμƨƒƢơƞơƤ): ǟ ȏƢƚƣƘƦƚƥƔμȱƟƚ Ʀʭ ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ ƢƣȶƤ ƦȶƟ ǒƣƫƦƔ. L 1 lm. add. Elmsley; (ƾμƨƒƢơƞơƤ s.) L

861 (ƢƣȯƝƦƫƣ): ƢƣƔƝƦƜƝȳ. L 1 lm. add. Lascaris

863 ƢȷƦƘƣơƟ ǎƖȺ μȯƦƔƜơƤ : ǿ ƩơƣȶƤ ƦʀƤ Ʀƣơƨơʝ ƾƝơȹƫƟ ƛƣƚƟơȹƥƚƤ ǎƢȴ Ʀʁ ƾƟƔƜƣȱƥƘƜ ƦʀƤ ŸƚƜƔƟƘȵƣƔƤ ƨƚƥȴ ƦơʝƦơŭ DŽƣƔ ƾƟƔȵƥƛƚƦȷƤ ƘǮμƜ Ǡ ƝƔƦƔƝơȹƫ ƛƣȳƟơƧ ƦƜƟȷƤ; L T 2 ƾƟƔƒƥƛƚƦơƤ: cf. sch. 943.2 ubi μƏƦƔƜơƤ per ƾƟƮƚƦơƤ interpretatus est scholiasta 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 863–4 ƢƮƦƘƣơƟ – ơDzƝƦơƧ post ǎƢȴ add. Ʀʭ ƛƔƟƏƦʪ ǢƖơƧƟ T 2 ƦơʝƦƮ ƨƚƥƜ, inverso ordine, T Ǡ om. L 3 ƝƔƦƔƝơƯƫ] ƾƝơƯƫ T

202

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

866 ơȎƝ ǂƥƚμơƟ [ƾƞƞȮ ƗƧƥƦƧƩʀ]: ơȎ μƜƝƣȶƟ ƾƞƞȮ μȱƖƔƟ ƝƔȴ ǎƠȯƝơƧƥƦơƟŭ ƦơʝƦơ ƗȰ ȟƤ ɌƥƛƚμȱƟƚ μƘȵƙơƟơƤ ƕơʀƤ. L T 1 lm. L decurtavi: ǞƩƘʎ ƖƏƣ ƦƜƤ ơȎƝ ǂƥƚμơƟ, haud male T codd.

μƐƖƔƟ Stephanus 362: μƐƖƔ

867 ƝƔȵ ƦƜ ƝƔƜƟȵƙƘƜ ƥƦȱƖƚ : ǒơƜƝȱ ƦƜ ƟƘȻƦƘƣơƟ ǒƩƘƜƟ ǿ ơǴƝơƤ. L T 1 hoc sch. cum sch. 866 c. in T (Ʀȶ ƗȰ ƝƔȵ ƦƜ ƝƔƜƟȵƙƘƜ ƥƦȱƖƚ) lm. ex T (vide notam praecedentem): deest in L; (ƝƔƒ s.) L ǒơƜƝƘ] ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǒơƜƝƘ T ƟƘưƦƘƣơƟ] ƝƔƜƟƮƦƘƣơƟ T

868a ƠȹƟƘƤ ƗƐ : ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƦʀƥƗƘ ǂƝơƧƥơƟŭ ƢƔƣȮ Ʀȶ ǒƛơƤ ƖȮƣ ƝƔƦƘƥƦƧƖƟƔƝƧʎƔ ƢƣȷƥƘƜƥƜƟ. L T 1–2 sch. 868a post sch. 868b praebet T 1 lm.] ƠƯƟƘƤ T; accuratiss. vv. 868–70 ƠƯƟƘƤ – ƥƧƟƫƨƣƧƫμƐƟƚ ƩƫƣƘʎ ǂƝơƧƥơƟ ƦʀƥƗƘ, inverso ordine, T 1–2 ƝƔƦƘƥƦƧƖƟƔƝƧʎƔ] ƥƦƧƖƟƑ T 2 ƢƣƮƥƘƜƥƜƟ] ƢƣƮƘƜƥƜƟ T

868b (ƠƯƟƘƤ): ƾƞƞȳƞƔƜƤ ƢƔƣƔƝƘƞƘȹơƟƦƔƜ Ɣǯ ƾƢȶ Ʀơʝ Ʃơƣơʝ. L T 1 vide ad sch. 868a.1–2 lm. addidi ƢƔƣƔƝƘƞƘƯơƟƦƔƜ post Ʃơƣơʝ transp. T

872 (Ʀȶ ƗʬƣơƟ … Ʀȶ ƢȷμƢƜμơƟ): Ʀȶ ƢƘμƨƛȱƟŭ ƞȱƖƘƜ ƗȰ ƦȶƟ ƩƜƦʬƟƔ. L; cf. gll. in Ts.l 1 Ʀȶ ƢƘμƨƛƐƟ: cf. sch. Eur. Hipp. 577 ubi ƢơμƢƒμƔ per ƢƘμƢơμƐƟƚ explicatur 1 lm. addidi Ʀȶ ƢƘμƨƛȱƟ] Ʀȶ ƢƘμƨƛȰƟ ǎƝƘƒƟʪ gl. ad ƢƮμƢƜμơƟ T ƩƜƦȺƟ gl. ad ƗʬƣơƟ nec plura T

ƞƐƖƘƜ – fin.] ǿ

203

sch. 866 – sch. 881

874 ƕȱƕƚƝƘ ŸƚƜȯƟƘƜƣƔ : ƕȱƕƚƝƘ, ƨƚƥȵƟ, ǟ ŸƚƜȯƟƘƜƣƔ ƘǮƤ NjƜƗơƧ ơȎ ƦơʎƤ Ƣơƥȴ ƕƘƕƚƝƧʎƔŭ Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ ƥʬμƔ ơȎƝ ǂƢƘƜƥƜƟ ƘǮƤ NjƜƗơƧ. L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 874–5 ƕƐƕƚƝƘ – ƢơƗƮƤ

2 ơȎƝ ǂƢƘƜƥƜƟ] ơȎ ƝƏƦƘƜƥƜƟ T

876 ơȎ ƗȳƢơƛŪ ȟƤ ƛƔƟơʝƥƔ; : ƝƔƦŪ ǎƣȻƦƚƥƜƟŭ ơȎƩȴ ȟƤ ƛƔƟơʝƥƔ ƕȱƕƚƝƘƟ; ƗƐ, ǎƢƘȴ ƝƔȴ ƙʬƟƦȯ ǎƥƦȵ ƢơƧ ƢơƣƘƧƛʀƟƔƜ. L T 1–2 hoc sch. cum sch. 874 c. in T (ƢƣȶƤ ȁ ǎƢƏƖƘƜ ƝƔƦŪ ǎƣưƦƚƥƜƟ) 1 lm. deest in T ơȎƩƒ] ơȎƝ DŽƣƔ T 2 ƛƔƟơʝƥƔ add. Papageorgiou ƗȰ om. T ǎƥƦƒ ante ƝƔȴ ƙʬƟƦƔ transp. T ƢơƣƘƧƛʀƟƔƜ] Ƣ. ƦƜƟƏ T

879a ƥƩƘƦƞƜȻƦƔƦƔ : ƥƩƘƦƞƜȻƦƔƦƔ ǤƞƛƘ ƢƣȶƤ ƦȲƟ ƾƟƔȵƣƘƥƜƟ, ƦơƧƦȱƥƦƜƟ ȟƤ ǂƟ ƦƜƤ ǮƗȺƟ Ǡ ƾƝơȹƥƔƤ ƥƩƘƦƞƜȯƥƘƜƘƟ ƦȲƟ ƢƣɱƠƜƟ. L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. v. 879 ƥƩƘƦƞƜưƦƔƦƔ – ƢƣɱƠƜƟ Studien zu Sophokles, Leipzig 1880, 175

ǤƞƛƘ del. O. Hense,

879b ƘǮƢȰ Ʀʭ μȷƣʪ : ƦȵƟƜ ƛƔƟȯƦʪ ƥƧƟȱƢƘƥƘƟ; ƾƟƦȴ ƦȵƟƜ ƦƣȷƢʪ ǎƦƘƞƘȹƦƚƥƘƟ; L Ts.l. 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. vv. 879–80 ƘǮƢƐ – ƠƧƟƦƣƐƩƘƜ; ƾƟ. Ʀơʝ T

ƥƧƟƐƢƘƥƘƟ om. T

ƾƟƦƒ]

881 (ƔȏƦȲƟ ƗƜƚȵƥƦƫƥƘƟ): ƔȎƦȲ ǏƔƧƦȲƟ ƾƨƔƟʀ ƾƢȶ Ʀơʝ ƕȵơƧ ǎƢơȵƚƥƘƟ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris ǏƔƧƦȲƟ] ǏƔƧƦȲƟ ǞƨƏƟƜƥƘƟ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ T ǎƢơƒƚƥƘƟ] ƢƘƢơƒƚƝƘƟ T

204

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

882 ƦȵƤ ƛƧμȶƤ Ǡ ƦȵƟƘƤ ƟȷƥơƜ : ƦȵƟƜ ƛƧμʭ ƩƣƚƥƔμȱƟƚ ǏƔƧƦȲƟ ƾƟƘʎƞƘƟ; L 1 lm. accuratiss. vv. 882–4 ƦƜƤ ƛƧμƮƤ – ƠƧƟƘʎƞƘ;

882–4a1 (ƦƒƤ ƛƧμƮƤ – ƠƧƟƘʎƞƘ;): [Ǡ] ƦȵƤ ƛƧμƮƤ, ƨƚƥȵƟ, ƾƟƘʎƞƘ ƦȲƟ ŸƚƜȯƟƘƜƣƔƟ; L 1 haec a sch. pr. deleto Ǡ segregavi lm. addidi

882–4a2 (ƦƒƤ ƛƧμƮƤ – ƠƧƟƘʎƞƘ;): ƦȵƤ ƛƧμȶƤ ƥƧƟƘʎƞƘƟ; L 1 lm. addidi in initio scholii subauditur Ʀȶ ǏƠʀƤ

883 ƦȯƟƗŪ ƔǮƩμȮƟ ƕȱƞƘơƤ : ƢƘƣƜƨƣƔƥƦƜƝʬƤ Ʀȶ ƕȱƞơƤŭ ƕȱƞơƤ ƗȰ ƘǴƢƘƟ ƦȲƟ ŸƚƜȯƟƘƜƣƔƟ, ȃƦƜ ƦƣȷƢơƟ ƕȱƞơƧƤ ƾƟƘʎƞƘƟ ǏƔƧƦȳƟŭ Ǡ ǣƦƜƤ ȟƤ ƕȱƞơƤ ǮơƕȷƞơƟ μȱƖƔ ƝƔƝȶƟ ƢƣơƥƘƦƣȵƪƔƦơ Ʀʭ ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ. L; cf. gl. in Ts.l. 1 lm. ex Lp: ƦɱƟƗŪ ƔǮƩμɱƟ ƕƐƞƘơƤ L 1 ƢƘƣƜƨƣƔƥƦƜƝʬƤ – fin.] ǢƖơƧƟ ƕƐƞơƤ ƢƘƣƜƨƣƔƥƦƜƝʬƤ gl. ad ƔǮƩμȮ ƕƐƞƘơƤ nec plura T 3 ƢƣơƥƘƦƣƒƪƔƦơ Stephanus 363: ƢƣơƘƦƣƒƪƔƦơ L

885 (ƢƣȶƤ ƛƔƟȯƦʪ ƛȯƟƔƦơƟ): ƦȶƟ ǏƔƧƦʀƤ ƢƣȶƤ Ʀʭ ǧƣƔƝƞȱơƧƤ. L; cf. gll. in Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris 1 ƦȶƟ – fin.] Ʀʭ Ʀơʝ ǧƣƔƝƞȱơƧƤ gl. ad ƛƔƟƏƦʪ et ǏƔƧƦʀƤ gl. ad ƛƏƟƔƦơƟ nec plura T

sch. 882 – sch. 892b

205

888 ǎƢƘʎƗƘƤ, Ȥ μƔƦƔȵƔ : ƦƘƛȱƔƥƔƜ ƦȲƟ ǎƝƘȵƟƚƤ ƦȷƞμƔƟ; ǎƝƔƣƦȱƣƚƥƔƤ ǮƗƘʎƟ ƦȲƟ ȞμȷƦƚƦƔ; ơȓƦƫƤ ƖȮƣ ƘǴƢƘƟ ƦȲƟ ȓƕƣƜƟ. ƝƔȴ ƟʝƟ ƗȰ Ʀȶ μƔƦƔȵƔ ƝƔƦȮ ƾƟƦȵƨƣƔƥƜƟ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ Ȥ μƘƞȱƔŭ ƝƔȴ ȋμƚƣơƤ ƖȮƣ Ʀȶ μȯƦƔƜơƟ μȱƞƘơƟ ƝƔƞƘʎŭ 5 ơȎ μȱƟ ƦơƜ μȱƞƘơƤ ƘǮƣȳƥƘƦƔƜ ƔǴƟơƤ. L T 2 ȞμƮƦƚƦƔ: cf. sch. Aristid. 1, 80 Lenz-Behr ƦȲƟ ȓƕƣƜƟ] ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƦȲƟ ȞμƮƦƚƦƔ ƝƔȴ ƟʝƟ: cf. sch. 863 3 ƝƔȴ ȋμƚƣơƤ – 4 ƝƔƞƘʎ: cf. sch. Hom. Il. 23.795a1 {ƾƟƦȵƞơƩŪ ơȎ μȱƟ ƦơƜ} μȱƞƘơƤ: ȃƦƜ μȯƦƔƜơƤ ƝƔȴ ƢƣȶƤ ơȎƗȱƟ· ơǯ ƗȰ ƟƘȻƦƘƣơƜ ƦȶƟ ƦƔƞƔȵƢƫƣơƟ μȱƞƘơƟ; 23.795a2 {ơȎ μȱƟ ƦơƜ} μȯƦƔƜơƤ· ơȎƝ ơǮƝƦƣȷƤ, ȟƤ ơǯ ƦƣƔƖƜƝơȵ; Hesych. μ 678 μƐƞƘơƤŭ μƏƦƔƜơƤ (Ƌ 795); Ɔ μ 95 μȱƞƘơƤŭ ǂƛƞƜơƤ, μƏƦƔƜơƤ, ƦƔƞƔȵƢƫƣơƤ, ƗƧƥƦƧƩȳƤ = Phot. μ 230 = Su. μ 477+ 5 Hom. Il. 23.795 1 lm. deest in Ƈ; accuratiss. v. 888 ǎƢƘʎƗƘƤ – ȓƕƣƜƟ; ƦƘƛƐƔƥƔƜ – ƦƮƞμƔƟ om. Ƈ ǎƝƔƣƦƐƣƚƥƔƤ] ǎƝ. ƨƚƥȴƟ Ƈ 2 ƦȲƟ ȞμƮƦƚƦƔ] ƦƑƟƗƘ ƦȲƟ ȓƕƣƜƟ ƦơƧƦƐƥƦƜ ƦȲƟ Ȟμ. Ƈ ơȓƦƫƤ] ơȓƦƫ Ƈ ƘǴƢƘƟ – μƔƦƔƒƔ] ƩƣȲ ƟơƘʎƟ ƦȲƟ ȓƕƣƜƟŭ Ʀȶ ƗȰ μƔƦƔƒƔ Ƈ 3 ƖȮƣ om. Ƈ

890 (ƦƒƤ ǤƟ;) ƾƟƦȴ ƦȵƟƔ ƛƧμȶƟ ƘǴƩƘƟ ƦȷƦƘ; L 1 sch. ad lm. ƦƒƤ ƛƧμƮƤ v. 882 adscripsit Elmsley lm. addidi

891 (ƔȎƦƑ – ƦƏƗƘ): ƦƔʝƦƔ Ʀʁ ƩƘƜƣȴ ǏƔƧƦʀƤ ƗƜƘƢƣȯƠƔƦơ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. addidi ƦƔʝƦƔ post ƗƜƘƢƣƏƠƔƦơ transp. T

892a (Ʀȵ ƨƫƟƘʎƤ;): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǂƢƜƥƦƔ ƞȱƖƘƜƤ. Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris

892b (ƥƔƨƚƟʀ ): ƾƞƚƛʀ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

206

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

894 (ƿ ƟȱơƣƦơƤ ǃƗƘ ƟȹμƨƔ): ǟ ƟƘƫƥƦȴ ǎƟƦƔʝƛƔ ǿƣμȳƥƔƥƔ Ƕȷƞƚŭ ƾƟȱơƣƦơƤ ƗȰ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƔǮƥƩƣȮ ƝƔȴ ƾƢƣƘƢȳƤ. L; cf. gll. in Ts.l. 1 ƟƘƫƥƦƒ: cf. sch. OC 1507 ƟƐơƣƦơƟ] ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƟƐơƟ; Su. Ɵ 202 ƁƐơƣƦơƟ: ƟƐơƟ 1 lm. add. Papageorgiou; auctorem huius scholii inter ƿ ƟƐơƣƦơƤ et ƾƟƐơƣƦơƤ fluctuare patet (vide Wolff 58; haec diversis ab interpretibus scripta esse coni. Valckenaer 75r ) 1 ǟ ƟƘƫƥƦȴ – fin.] ǟ ƔǮƥƩƣȮ ƝƔȴ ƾƢƣƘƢȲƤ gl. ad ƾƟƐơƣƦơƤ et ǟ ƟƘƫƥƦȴ ǎƟƦƔʝƛƔ ǎƞƛơʝƥƔ ǶƮƞƚ gl. ad ǃƗƘ ƟƯμƨƔ Ƈ

898 (ƝƦȵƥƔƜ): ƝƔƦƔƥƝƘƧȯƥƔƜ ƝƔȴ ƢơƜʀƥƔƜŭ ƝƔƞʬƤ ƗȰ ȟƤ ǎƢȴ μƘƖȯƞʪ ƦơƞμȳμƔƦƜ ƘǴƢƘƟ ƦȲƟ ƞȱƠƜƟ. L T; cf. etiam gll. in Ts.l. 1 ƢơƜʀƥƔƜ: cf. sch. Aesch. Eum. 17 ƝƦȵƥƔƤ· ƢơƜȳƥƔƤ. ǮƗȵƫμƔ ƗȰ ƦơʝƦơ ŵǮƥƩȹƞơƧ.; id. Pers. 289 ǒƝƦƜƥƔƟ] ǎƢơƒƚƥƔƟ; id. Supp. 636a ƝƦƒƥƔƜ] ƢơƜʀƥƔƜ 1 lm. add. Brunck2; (ƝƦƒƥƔƜ s.) L ƝƔƦƔƥƝƘƧƏƥƔƜ ƝƔȴ ƢơƜʀƥƔƜ om. in margine, sed ƝƔƦƔƥƝƘƧƏƥƔƜ, ƢơƜʀƥƔƜ praebuit ut gll. ad ƝƦƒƥƔƜ T ƗȰ om. T, quoniam ab ƝƔƞʬƤ scholium incipit

899 (ƢƘƯƥɾ – ǎμơƒ ): ơȓƦƫƤ ƾƝƣƜƕʬƤ ƗƜƚƖȳƥơμƔȵ ƥơƜ Ʀȶ ƢƣɱƖμƔ ȟƤ ƢƘƜƥƛʀƟƔȵ ƥƘ ȃƦƜ ƾƞƚƛʀ ƞȱƖƫ. L T 1 lm. addidi; (ƢƘƯƥɾ s.) L

901 (ƝơʎƞƔ): ƖƣȯƨƘƦƔƜ ƝơƜƟȯŭ Ǡ ƦȮ Ʀơʝ ƛƔƟȯƦơƧ Ǡ ƦȮ ƔȏƦʀƤ ƝƔȴ ƦȮ ƔȎƦơʝ. L; cf. sch. retractatum in T; cf. etiam gl. in Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley; (ƝơʎƞƔ s.) L ƖƣƏƨƘƦƔƜ ƝơƜƟƏ om. in margine T, sed praebuit ut gl. ad ƝơʎƞƔ Ɩƣ. LT Ǡ (pr.) – fin. ita reformavit T: ƝơʎƞƔ ƦȮ Ʀơʝ ƛƔƟƏƦơƧ Ǡ ƝơƜƟȮ ƦȮ ƔȎƦơʝ ƝƔȴ ƦȮ ƔȎƦʀƤ 1–2 ƦȮ ƔȎƦơʝ T (coni. iam Papageorgiou): Ʀơʝ ƔȎƦơʝ L: [Ʀơʝ] ƔȎƦơʝ Wolff 58

sch. 894 – sch. 905b1

207

902 (ƢƔʎƗƔ ... ƥƦơƣƟȹƟƛŪ ): ƦȶƟ țƞƞơƟ ƥƦƣƫƟƟȹƟƦƔ. L T 1 ƥƦƣƫƟƟƯƟƦƔ: cf. sch. Hom. Od. 3.158 ǎƥƦƮƣƘƥƘƟ] ǒƥƦƣƫƥƘƟ; Apollon. S. 77, 33 ǎƥƦƮƣƘƥƘƟŭ ǒƥƦƣƫƥƘƟ; Ɔ Ƙ 876 ǎƥƦƮƣƘƥƘƟ: ǒƥƦƣƫƥƘƟ = Su. Ƙ 3230; Hesych. Ƙ 6420 ǎƥƦƮƣƘƥƔƟŭ ǒƥƦƣƫƥƔƟ; sch. D Hom. Il. 9.621 ƥƦơƣƐƥƔƜ: ƥƦƣʬƥƔƜ; Ɔ ƥ 240 ƥƦơƣƐƥƔƜ: ƥƦƣʬƥƔƜ = Phot. 540, 25 = Su. ƥ 1143; Żesych. Ƙ 6421 ǎƥƦơƣƐƥƛƚ: ǎƥƦƣưƛƚ; Ɔ Ƙ 877 ǎƥƦơƣƐƥƛƚ: ǎƥƦƣưƛƚ = Phot. Ƙ 2035 = Su. Ƙ 3231 1 lm. addidi in initio scholii ƘǴƗƘ praefixit Ƈ

905–6 (ƝƞƔʎƘ – ƢƏƣơƤ): ƝƔȴ ǣƢƦƘƦȷ ƦƜƟơƤ ǎƣƖƔƞƘȵơƧ ȥƟ ƘǮưƛƘƜ μƘƦƔƩƘƜƣȵƙƘƥƛƔƜ ƥƧƟȷƟƦơƤ ƔȎƦʁ Ʀơʝ ǧƣƔƝƞȱơƧƤ, ơǵơƟ ǯƥƦơʝ Ǣ ƦƜƟơƤ ƦơƜơȹƦơƧ, ȞƗȹƣƘƦơ ȟƤ ƞơƜƢȶƟ ƝƔƦƔƞƜμƢȯƟơƧƥƔ ƔȎƦȯ. L T 1 ƪƔƯƥƘƜƘƟ per ǣƢƦƘƦơ explicatur etiam in sch. D Hom. Il. 16.216 ƪƔʝơƟ: … ǣƢƦơƟƦơ; ibid. 13.132 ƪƔʝơƟ: … ǣƢƦơƟƦơ; Hesych. ƪ 83 ƪƔʝƥƔƜŭ ǃƪƔƥƛƔƜ; Ɔ ƪ 5 ƪƔƯƘƜ: ǃƢƦƘƦƔƜ = Su. ƪ 30+ ȂƣƖƔƟơƟ per ǎƣƖƔƞƘʎơƟ explicatur etiam in Hesych. ơ 1107 ȂƣƖƔƟơƟŭ … ǎƣƖƔƞƘʎơƟ 1 lm. addidi ƘǮ add. Papageorgiou ǣƢƦƘƦơ] ǣƢƦ., ƨƚƥƒ, Ƈ ƘǮ ǣƢƦƘƦơ pro ƘǮ ǃƢƦơƜƦơ usu recentiore adhiberi videtur ƘǮưƛƘƜ Ƈ (coni. iam Bernardakis 62): ƘDzƫƛƘ L 3 ȞƗƯƣƘƦơ] ƝƔȴ ȞƗ. Ƈ

905a (ǎƣȳμƚ): ƩȳƣƔ. Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

905b1 (ǾƣƖƏƟƫƟ): ǮƥƦơʝ [ƗȰ] DzƥƫƤ ǎƨƑƢƦƘƦơ ƗƜȮ ƦȶƟ ƝƔƦƔƥƝƘƧƔƥƛƐƟƦƔ ƢƐƢƞơƟ ǎƢȴ ƦƔʎƤ ƥƧμƨơƣƔʎƤ. L T 1–2 haec a sch. 905–6 separavi

1 lm. addidi ƗȰ delevi

208

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

905b2 ǾƣƖȯƟƫƟ : Ǡ ƦʬƟ ǯƥƦơƧƣƖƜƝʬƟ Ǡ ƦʬƟ ǎƣƖƔƞƘȵƫƟ ơǵƤ ƦȶƟ ƢȱƢƞơƟ ǒƩƣƜƥƘƟ. Ls.l. T 1 lm. deest in L

907 (ǂƞƞɾ ƗȰ Ɲǂƞƞɾ): ƾƟƦȴ ƦʁƗƘ ƝƾƝƘʎƥƘ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris ƾƟƦƒ om. Ƈ

911a ƦȮƤ ǂƢƔƜƗƔƤ : ǎƢƘȴ μƚƝȱƦƜ ǒμƘƞƞƘƟ ƢƔʎƗƔƤ ƦȵƝƦƘƜƟ ǢƦơƜ ƥƩȳƥƘƜƟ, ȃƦƜ Ʀơʝ ƞơƜƢơʝ ơȎ ƖƘƟȳƥơƟƦƔƜ ƥƧƟơƧƥȵƔƜ ƢƣȶƤ ƦȶƟ ǧƣƔƝƞȱƔ ƘǮƤ ƢƔƜƗơƢơƜȵƔƟ. L T 1 lm. ex Ƈ (ƦȮƤ ǂƢƔƜƗƔƤ ƞƐƖƘƜ, ǎƢƘȴ etc): deest in L; accuratiss. v. 911 ƦȮƤ ǂƢƔƜƗƔƤ – ơȎƥƒƔƤ ǎƢƘȴ μƚƝƐƦƜ pro ǎƢƘȴ ơȎƝƐƦƜ usu recentiore; vide ad sch. El. 31.3 2 ȃƦƜ] ơȎƥƒƔƜ ƗȰ ȃƦƜ Ƈ

911b ơȎƥƒƔƤ [ƗȰ] ƝơƒƦƔƤ, ƥƧƟơƧƥƒƔƤ. L 1 haec a sch. pr. separavi ƗȰ delevi

914 (ǎƢƘƥƝƜƔƥμȱƟƚ): ƢƘƣƜƝƘƝƔƞƧμμȱƟƚ, ƝƣȹƢƦơƧƥƔ. Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris

915 (ƨƣơȹƣơƧƟ): ǎƨȹƞƔƦƦơƟ. Ls.l. 1 cf. sch. Ph. 151 ƨƣơƧƣƘʎƟ …: … ƨƧƞƏƦƦƘƜƟ; Hesych. ƨ 919 ƨƣơƧƣƘʎŭ ƨƧƞƏƦƦƘƜ; Ɔ ƨ 207 ƨƣơƧƣƘʎŭ ƨƧƞƏƥƥƘƜ = Su. ƨ 740 1 lm. add. Lascaris

sch. 905b2 – sch. 925b

209

915–6 (ƗƘμƟȵơƜƤ | ƦơʎƤ ǧƣƔƝƞƘȵơƜƤ): ǒƟƛƔ ƥƧƟƘƝȯƛƘƧƗƘƟŭ ǂƞƞơ ƖȮƣ ǤƟ ȃƢƘƣ ǎƥƦȷƣƘƥƘƟ ǿ țƞƞơƤ. L T 1 ǂƞƞơ – fin. v. 901 1 lm. add. Brunck2: ƛƏƞƔμơƟ (913) T: deest in L Papageorgiou, sed ad ƖƧƟƔʎƝƔ spectat scholiasta ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ T 2 ǎƥƦƮƣƘƥƘƟ] ǒƥƦƣƫƥƘƟ T

ƥƧƟƘƝƏƛƘƧƗƘƟ] ƥƧƟƘƝȯƛƘƧƗơƟ post ƥƧƟƘƝȯƛƘƧƗƘƟ add. Ʀʭ

917 (ǎƢƘƟƛơƣơʝƥŪ ǂƟƫ): ǎƟƔƞơμȱƟƚ ǂƟƫ ƘǮƤ ƦȲƟ ƝƞȵƟƚƟ. L; cf. gll. in Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris; (ǎƢƘƟƛơƣơʝƥŪ s.) L ǎƟƔƞơμȱƟƚ – fin] ǎƟƔƞƞơμȱƟƚ gl. ad ǎƢƘƟƛơƣơʝƥƔ et ƘǮƤ ƦȲƟ ƝƞƒƟƚƟ gl. ad ǂƟƫ nec plura T 1 ǎƟƔƞơμȱƟƚ dubitanter Papageorgiou, confidenter ego coll. sch. 1a.10 ƢƣơƕƔƞơμƐƟơƧ: ǎƟƔƞƞơμƐƟƚ LT

922 (ƘȎƟȳƦƣƜƔƟ): ƘȎƟƔƙơμȱƟƚƟ, ƝơƜμƫμȱƟƚƟ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris, sed pro ƘȎƟƑƦƣƜƔƟ scripsit ƘȎƟƑƦƣƘƜƔƟ

925a (ƢƣơȒƝƘƜƦơ) μƔƥƦʬƟ ƢƘƣơƟƒƤ : ƢƣȶƤ Ʀʭ ƥƦȳƛƘƜ ƖȮƣ ǎƢƘƣơƟʬƟƦơ Ɣǯ ƖƧƟƔʎƝƘƤ. L T 1 lm. T supplevi: deest in L; (ƢƣơƯƝƘƜƦơ s.) L

ƢƣȶƤ … ƖȮƣ] ȃƦƜ ƢƣȶƤ T

925b ǎƝ ƗŪ ǎƞȻƢƜƥƘƟ : ǎƖȹμƟƫƥƘƟ, ǎƠȱƗƧƥƘƟŭ ƞʬƢơƤ ƖȮƣ Ʀȶ ǯμȯƦƜơƟ. L T ǎƠƐƗƧƥƘƟ: cf. Ael. D. Ƙ 42 ǎƠƘƞȻƢƜƥƔƤŭ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǎƠȱƗƧƥƔƤ, ǒƠƫ Ʀơʝ ƞơƢơʝ ǎƢơȵƚƥƔƤ; Hesych. Ƙ 3701 ǎƠƘƞȻƢƜƥƘƟ· †ƾƢȳƟƛƚƥƘƟ. ǎƠƘƥƝȹƞƘƧƥƘƟ, ǎƠȱƗƧƥƘƟ (Soph. Trach. 925); Eust. Od. II 47, 20–1 … ǎƝ ƦơȹƦơƧ ƗȰ ƝƔȴ Ʀȶ ǎƠƘƞȻƢƜƥƔƤ ǎƟ ʜƚƦơƣƜƝʭ ƝƘʎƦƔƜ ƞƘƠƜƝʭ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǎƠȱƗƧƥƔƤ, ǒƠƫ Ʀơʝ ƞơƢơʝ ǎƢơȵƚƥƔƤ ƞʬƢơƤ – fin.: cf. sch. Ar. Plut. 165a …ƞʬƢơƤ ƖȮƣ Ʀȶ ǯμƏƦƜơƟ ƞƐƖƘƦƔƜ; Hesych. ƞ 1513 ƞʬƢơƤŭ ǯμƏƦƜơƟ; Ɔ ƞ 178 ƞʬƢơƤŭ ǯμƏƦƜơƟ = Phot. ƞ 505 = Su. ƞ 735; Eust. Od. II 47, 22 … ƝƔȴ ƞʬƢơƤ ƢƣơƢƘƣƜƥƢƫμƐƟƫƤ Ʀȶ ǯμƏƦƜơƟ; Źƀ 571, 1

210

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

1 lm. Lascaris: ǎƞưƢƜƥƘ ƗȰ Ƈ, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 925a coniungat; (ǎƞưƢƜƥƘƟ s.) L ǎƖƯμƟƫƥƘƟ] ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǎƖ. Ƈ ƞʬƢơƤ] ƞưƢƚ Ƈ

928 (Ʀʭ ƢƔƜƗȴ – ƦƏƗƘ): Ʀʭ țƞƞʪ, Ʀʭ ƢƔƜƗȴ ƦʀƤ ƦơƜƔʝƦƔ ƦơƞμȻƥƚƤ. L; cf. gll. in Ts.l. 1 lm. addidi Ʀʭ țƞƞʪ – fin.] Ʀʭ țƞƞʪ gl. ad Ʀʭ ƢƔƜƗƒ et ƦʀƤ ƦȮ ƦơƜƔʝƦƔ ƦơƞμưƥƚƤ gl. ad ƦʀƤ ƦƘƩƟƫμƐƟƚƤ ƦƏƗƘ nec plura Ƈ

929 ƝƾƟ ɣ : ƝƔȴ ǎƟ ɣŭ ƝƔȴ ǎƟ ȃƥʪ ƗƜƘƦƣȱƩơμƘƟ ƢƣȶƤ ƦȶƟ țƞƞơƟ, ƘǴƦƔ ƢȯƞƜƟ ƢƣȶƤ ƦȲƟ ŸƚƜȯƟƘƜƣƔƟ, ǒƨƛƔƥƘƟ ǏƔƧƦȲƟ ƾƟƘƞơʝƥƔ. L T 1 lm. deest in L; (ƝǀƟ ɣ s.) L; pars ƝƔȴ ǎƟ ȃƥʪ (1) – fin. ad lm. latius spectat vv. 929– 31 ƝƾƟ ɣ – ƢƘƢƞƚƖμƐƟƚƟ ƝƔȴ ǎƟ ɣ om. Ƈ ȃƥʪ] ȃƥʪ, ƨƚƥƒ, Ƈ ƢƣȶƤ] ǎƢȴ Ƈ 2 ƢƣƮƤ] ǎƢȴ Ƈ

931 ȏƨŪ ǥƢƔƣ : ƢƘƣȴ Ʀȶ ǥƢƔƣ ƖȮƣ ƨƣȱƟƘƤ ƘǮƥȴ ƢƔƩƘʎƔƜŭ ȋμƚƣơƤ ȃƛƜ ƦƘ ƨƣȱƟƘƤ ǥƢƔƣ ǒƩơƧƥƜƟ. L T; cf. etiam gl. in Ts.l. 1 ƢƘƣȴ – ƢƔƩƘʎƔƜ: cf. Hp. Oss. IX 180, 2–3 Littré ƉƣȱƟƘƤ ƗȰ ƢƣơƥƢƘƨȹƝƔƥƜ Ʀʭ ǣƢƔƦƜ, ǁƤ ơȎ ʜɰƗƜơƟ ƩƫƣȵƥƔƜ; sch. Hom. Od. 9.301 ȃƛƜ ƨƣȱƟƘƤ ǥƢƔƣ ǒƩơƧƥƜƟ] ȃƢơƧ Ɣǯ ƨƣȱƟƘƤ Ʀȶ ǥƢƔƣ ƥƧƟȱƩơƧƥƜƟ. ƨƣȱƟƘƤ ƗȰ ƞȱƖơƟƦƔƜ ǿ ȏμȲƟ ǿ ƥƝȱƢƫƟ ƦȲƟ ƝƔƣƗȵƔƟ ƝƔȴ Ʀȶ ǥƢƔƣ; id. Il. 1.103c … ƘǮƥȴ ƗȰ ƦʬƟ ǎƟƦơƥƛȵƫƟ Ɣǯ ƨƣȱƟƘƤ· «ƢƞƘƧƣȮƤ ȏƨŪ ǥƢƔƣ ƝƔȴ ƨƣȱƟƔƤ» (Soph. Trach. 931)…; ibid. Il. 13.412 ǥƢƔƣ : ǒƕƔƞƘƟ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƘǮƤ Ʀȶ ǥƢƔƣ ȏƢơƝƏƦƫ ƦʬƟ ƨƣƘƟʬƟ. ƨƣƐƟƘƤ ƗȰ Ɣǯ ƗƜƘƙƫƥμƐƟƔƜ ƦȶƟ ȏƢȶ Ʀʭ ƢƟƘƯμơƟƜ ƝƔȴ Ʀʁ ƝƔƣƗƒɯ ƦƮƢơƟ, ȁƤ ƝƔƞƘʎƦƔƜ ƗƜƏƨƣƔƖμƔ ’ȏƨŪ ǥƢƔƣ ƝƔȴ ƨƣȱƟƔƤ ƢƘƢƞƚƖμƐƟƚ’ (Soph. Trach. 931) ȋμƚƣơƤ: Od. 9.301 ơȎƦȯμƘƟƔƜ ƢƣȶƤ ƥƦʀƛơƤ, ȃƛƜ ƨƣȱƟƘƤ ǥƢƔƣ ǒƩơƧƥƜ 1 lm. ex ſ: deest in LƇ; accuratiss. ȏƨŪ ǥƢƔƣ ƝƔȴ ƨƣƐƟƔƤ 1 ƢƘƣȴ – ƢƔƩƘʎƔƜ] om. in margine Ƈ, sed retractata ut gl. ad ȏƨŪ ǥƢƔƣ ƝƔȴ ƨƣȱƟƔƤ praebuit: ǎƢƘƜƗȲ ƢƘƣȴ Ʀȶ ǥƢƔƣ ƨƞƐƕƘƤ ƘǮƥȴ ƢƔƩƘʎƔƜ ƨƞƐƕƘƤ in linea et ƣ supra ƞ et Ɵ supra ƕ scripta ut fiat ƨƣƐƟƘƤ L: ƨƞƐƕƘƤ ſƇ ƢƔƩƘʎƔƜ Ƈ: ƦƔƩƘʎƔƜ L ȋμƚƣơƤ] ƝƔȴ ȋμ. T 2 ƦƘ] ƦơƜ T

sch. 925b – sch. 943

211

932 ǒƖƟƫ ƖȮƣ ƦƏƞƔƤ : ǒƖƟƫ ƖȮƣ ƝƔƦȮ ƢơʎơƟ ƦƣȷƢơƟ ƦơʝƦơ ǎƢơȵƚƥƘƟ ǟ μȳƦƚƣ ƔȎƦơʝŭ ƥƧƟƘʎƗƘƟ ȟƤ ǾƣƖƜƥƛƘʎƥƔ ǎƢȴ Ʀʭ ǞƢƔƦʀƥƛƔƜ ƢƔƣȮ Ʀơʝ ƁȱƥƥơƧ Ʀȶ ǒƣƖơƟ ƦơʝƦơ ƗƜƘƢƣȯƠƔƦơ. L T 1 lm. ex ſ: deest in LT; accuratiss. vv. 932–5 ǒƖƟƫ ƖȮƣ – ƦƏƗƘ; (ǒƖƟƫ s.) L ǒƖƟƫ] ǒƖ., ƨƚƥƒ, T ƖȮƣ om. T 1–2 ǎƢơƒƚƥƘƟ ǟ μƑƦƚƣ ƔȎƦơʝ] ǎƨƏƪƘƜƘƟ ad Deianirae tribuit scholiasta 2 ƥƧƟƘʎƗƘƟ ȟƤ om. T ǾƣƖƜƥƛƘʎƥƔ] Ǿƣ. ƖȮƣ T ǞƢƔƦʀƥƛƔƜ] ǎƠƚƢƔƦʀƥƛƔƜ T

937 (ƾμƨȵ ƟƜƟ): ƢƘƣȴ ƔȎƦȳƟ, ƦȲƟ μƚƦȱƣƔ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris

939 ƢƞƘƧƣȮƟ ƢƔƣƘȴƤ ǒƝƘƜƦơ : ƢƔƣƘȵƤ, ǎƝƦƘȵƟƔƤ ǏƔƧƦȶƟ Ǡ ƢƣơƥƝơƞƞȳƥƔƤ, ȞƗȹƣƘƦơ ȃƦƜ ƔȎƦȲƟ μƔƦƔȵƫƤ ɌƦƜȯƥƔƦơ ȟƤ ƝƔƝơȳƛƫƤ ƾƢơƥƦƘȵƞƔƥƔƟ ƔȎƦʭ ƦȶƟ ƩƜƦʬƟƔ. L; cf. retractationem in T 1–3 haec ita retractavit T: (lm. om.) ǎƝƦƘƒƟƔƤ ǏƔƧƦȶƟ ǎƢȴ ƢƞƘƧƣȮƟ Ǡ ƢƣơƥƝơƞƞƑƥƔƤ ǎƝƘƒƟɾ, ȞƗƯƣƘƦơ ȃƦƜ ƔȎƦȲƟ μƔƦƔƒƫƤ ɌƦƜȯƥƔƦơ ȟƤ ƝƔƝơȳƛƫƤ ƾƢơƥƦƘȵƞƔƥƔƟ ƔȎƦʭ ƦȶƟ ƩƜƦʬƟƔ. 1 lm. accuratiss. 939–40 ƢƞƘƧƣȮƟ – ƝƔƝʁ ƢƞƘƧƣȮƟ addidi 3 ƔȎƦʭ ex T: ƔȎƦȲƟ L: del. Lascaris

943 ȣƥƦŪ ƘDz ƦƜƤ Ɨȹơ | Ǡ ƝƔȴ ƢƞƘƒơƧƤ : ƦʬƟ ƾƟƛƣƫƢȵƟƫƟ ƾƗȳƞƫƟ ȂƟƦƫƟ ƾƟȷƚƦơȵ ƘǮƥƜƟ ơǯ ƞơƖƜƙȷμƘƟơƜ Ɨȹơ Ǡ ƝƔȴ ƢƞƘȵơƧƤ ǟμȱƣƔƤ ƝƔȴ ơȎ ƢƣơƥƗơƝʬƟƦƘƤ ƝƔƛŪ ǏƝȯƥƦƚƟ ȣƣƔƟ ƦȶƟ ƛȯƟƔƦơƟŭ ƢơƞƞȯƝƜƤ ƖȮƣ ƞȹƢɾ ƦƜƟȴ Ǡ ƗƧƥƦƧƩȵɯ ƢƘƣƜƢƘƥȷƟƦƘƤ ǏƔƧƦơȸƤ ȏƢƘƠȯƖơƧƥƜ Ʀơʝ ƕȵơƧ ƢƔƣƔƩƣʀμƔ 5 ƝƔȴ ơȎƝ ƾƟƔμȱƟơƧƥƜ ƦȲƟ ǎƢƜơʝƥƔƟ ǟμȱƣƔƟ ȟƤ ƝƔȴ ŸƚƜȯƟƘƜƣƔ. L T 2 ƾƟƮƚƦơƜ: cf. sch. 863.2 ubi μƏƦƔƜơƤ per ƾƟƔƒƥƛƚƦơƤ explanatur 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. 943–6 ȣƥƦŪ – ǟμƐƣƔƟ (lm.) ƢƞƘƒơƧƤ ſ: Ƣƞ compendiose L (ƢƞƘƒơƧƤ apud poetam) ƦʬƟ ƾƟƛƣƫƢȵƟƫƟ ƾƗȳƞƫƟ ȂƟƦƫƟ] ƦơƜơƯƦƫƟ ȂƟƦƫƟ ƦʬƟ ƾƟƛƣƫƢȵƟƫƟ ǢƖơƧƟ ƾƗƑƞƫƟ T 2 ƝƔȴ (pr.) om. T 4 ƢƔƣƔƩƣʀμƔ] ƢƔƣƔƧƦƒƝƔ T 5 ƝƔȴ (alt.)] ǟ T

212

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

947 ƢȷƦƘƣŪ ǀƟ ƢƣȷƦƘƣƔ : ƢơʎƔ, ƨƚƥȵ, ƥƦȱƟƫ, ƦȮ ƝƔƦȮ ƦȶƟ ǧƣƔƝƞȱƔ Ǡ ƦȮ ƝƔƦȮ ƦȲƟ ŸƚƜȯƟƘƜƣƔƟ; ƢơʎƔ ƩƔƞƘƢȻƦƘƣƔ ƝƔȴ ƢƘƣƔƜƦȱƣƫ ƗƘƜƟȷƦƚƦơƤ; ƗƧƥƝƔƦȯƞƚƢƦȯ ǎƥƦƜƟ ǮƥơμȱƖƘƛƔ ȂƟƦƔ. L T 3 ƗƧƥƝƔƦƏƞƚƢƦƔ quod ad ƗƯƥƝƣƜƦŪ (949) pertinet: cf. sch. Aesch. Pr. 458a ƗƧƥƝƣƒƦơƧƤŭ ƗƧƥƝƔƦƔƞƑƢƦơƧƤ et 458b ƗƧƥƝƣȵƦơƧƤ: ŸƧƥƝƔƦƔƞȳƢƦơƧƤ, ƗƧƥƖƟȻƥƦơƧƤ… 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. 947–9 ƢƮƦƘƣŪ- ƗƧƥƦƏƟʪ; grammaticơ non ƦƐƞƘƔ sed μƐƞƘƔ fuisse cognitum coni. Wunder3 126 2 ƗƘƜƟƮƦƚƦơƤ] ƗƘƜƟ. Ǡ ƢơʎƔ ƦƘƞƘƒƫƤ ƢƘƣƔƜƦƐƣƫ Ʀơʝ ƗƐơƟƦơƤ T 3 ƗƧƥƝƔƦƏƞƚƢƦƔ – fin.] om. in margine sed supra lineam praebuit T ǎƥƦƜƟ] ƘǮƥƜƟ T ǮƥơμƐƖƘƛƔ] ǮƥơμƘƖƐƛƚ Lascaris

948 ƦȯƗƘ μȰƟ ǒƩơμƘƟ : ƦȮ μȰƟ ƝƔƦȮ ƦȲƟ ŸƚƜȯƟƘƜƣƔƟ ƔȎƦƔʎƤ ȂƪƘƥƜƟ ǒƠƘƥƦƜ ƛƘƫƣƘʎƟ ǎƟ Ʀʭ ơDzƝʪ, ƦȮ ƗȰ ƝƔƦȮ ƦȶƟ ǧƣƔƝƞȱƔ ǎƝƗƘƩȷμƘƛƔ. L; cf. gll. in Ts.l. 2 μƐƟơμƘƟ per ǎƝƗƘƩƮμƘƛƔ explanatur etiam in sch. Aesch. Th. 393k μƐƟƘƜ] ǎƝƗƐƩƘƦƔƜ …; ibid. 912c μƐƟơƧƥƜ] ǎƝƗƐƩơƟƦƔƜ; sch. Eur. Or. 1217 μƐƟơƧƥƔ: … ǎƝƗƘƩơμƐƟƚ; id. Phoen. 1637; sch. Hom. Od. 1.304d μƐƟơƟƦƘƤ] ǎƝƗƘƩƮμƘƟơƜ 1 lm. accuratiss. 948–51 ƦƏƗƘ μƐƟ – ǎƞƢƒƥƜƟ; interpretem μƐƟơμƘƟ pro μƐƞƞơμƘƟ legisse ex ǎƝƗƘƩƮμƘƛƔ (3) coni. Wunder3 128 1–2 ƦȮ μȰƟ – ơDzƝʪ] ƦȮ ƝƔƦȮ ƦȲƟ ŸƚƜƏƟƘƜƣƔƟ gl. ad ƦƏƗƘ μȰƟ ǒƩơμƘƟ nec plura T 2 ƦȮ ƗȰ – ǧƣƔƝƞƐƔ] ƦȮ ƝƔƦȮ ƦȶƟ ǧƣƔƝƞƐƔ gl. ad ƦƏƗƘ ƗȰ μƐƞƞơμƘƟ nec plura T ǎƝƗƘƩƮμƘƛƔ] ǢƖơƧƟ ǎƝƗƘƩƮμƘƛƔ gl. ad ǎƢ˸ ǎƞƢƒƥƜƟ T

952a1 ƝơƜƟȮ ƗŪ ǒƩƘƜƟ ƦƘ ƝƔȴ μȱƞƞƘƜƟ : ƝơƜƟȮ Ɨȱ ǎƥƦƜ ƦȮ ƾμƨơƦȱƣƫƟ ƝƔƝȮ ƝƔȴ ƦȮ μȰƟ ǒƩơμƘƟ, ƦȮ ƗȰ μȱƞƞơμƘƟ. L T 1 lm.] deest in T ƗȰ om. T

2 μƐƞƞơμƘƟ] μƐƞ. ǓƠƘƜƟ T (Lascaris)

952a2 (ƝơƜƟȮ ƗŪ ǒƩƘƜƟ ƦƘ ƝƔȴ μȱƞƞƘƜƟ): DzƥơƟ Ɨȱ ǎƥƦƜ Ʀȶ ǒƩƘƜƟ ƝƔƝȮ ƝƔȴ Ʀȶ ƢƣơƥƗơƝɱƟ. L 1 lm. addidi; (ƝơƜƟƏ s.) L

sch. 947 – sch. 957

213

953 ƘDzƛŪ ƾƟƘμȷƘƥƥȯ ƦƜƤ : ƾƟƘμȷƘƥƥƔ ƔȒƣƔ ƢƘƣƜƨƔƟȲƤ ǂƟƘμơƤ, ǒƢơƧƣơƤ ơȒƣƜơƤ, ǏƥƦƜʬƦƜƤ ƝƔƦơƜƝȵƗƜơƤ. ǿ ƗȰ ƟơʝƤŭ ƘDzƛƘ ȟƤ ǓƥƦƚƝƔ ƢƟƘȹƥƘƜƘƟ ǂƟƘμơƤ ơȒƣƜơƤ ǎƢȴ ƦʀƤ ơǮƝȵƔƤ, dzƟƔ μƘ ƞƔƕȺƟ ƦƔȹƦƚƤ ƾƢƔƖȯƖɾ ƦʀƤ ǏƥƦȵƔƤ ƝƔȴ ƾƢơƩƫƣȵƙơƜ, ȃƢƫƤ μȲ ƢƔƣƔƩƣʀμƔ ƾƢơƛȯƟƫ ƛƘƔƥƔμȱƟƚ ƦȶƟ 5 ǧƣƔƝƞȱƔ ƝƔƝʬƤ ƗƜƔƝƘȵμƘƟơƟ. ƦơʝƦơ ƗȰ ƞȱƖƘƜ ȟƤ μȲ ƝƔƣƦƘƣơʝƥƔ ǮƗƘʎƟ ƦȮƤ ƥƧμƨơƣȯƤ. L T; cf. etiam gll. in Ts.l. 4 ƘǮƥƜƗơʝƥŪ per ƛƘƔƥƔμƐƟƚ explanatur etiam in sch. Hom. Il. 24.206 ǎƥƮƪƘƦƔƜ: … ƛƘƏƥƘƦƔƜ; id. Od. 1.118 ƘDzƥƜƗƘ: ǎƛƘƏƥƔƦơ; sch. D Hom. Il. 5.212 ǎƥƮƪơμƔƜ: … ƛƘƏƥơμƔƜ; ǂƨƔƣ per ƢƔƣƔƩƣʀμƔ explanatur etiam in sch. Hom. Il. 13.813–4 ǂƨƔƣ … ƢƔƣƔƩƣʀμƔ 1 lm. deest in T; pars ǿ ƗȰ ƟơʝƤ (2) – fin. ad lm. 953– 61 pertinet 1–2 ƾƟƘμƮƘƥƥƔ (alt) – ƟơʝƤ] haec om. in margine, sed ơȒƣƜơƤ ut gl. ad ǒƢơƧƣơƤ et ƝƔƦơƜƝȵƗƜơƤ ut gl. ad ǏƥƦƜʬƦƜƤ praebuit nec plura T 1 ƔȔƣƔ (ut apud poetam) L 2 ƘDzƛƘ] ƘDzƛƘ, ƨƚƥƒƟ, T 3 ǎƢȴ] ƾƢȶ T ƾƢƔƖƏƖɾ] ƾƢƔƖƏƖơƜ Ƈ 3–4 ƾƢƔƖƏƖɾ ... ƾƢơƩƫƣƒƙơƜ] de aoristo iuxta presentem posito vide sch. 1064.3 3 ǏƥƦȵƔƤ] ơǮƝƒƔƤ T 4 ƾƢơƩƫƣƒƙơƜ] ƾƢơƩƫƣƒƥơƜ T: ƾƢơƩƫƣƒƙɾ ‘si quid mutandum sit hisce in verbis’ Wansink 109: ƾƢơƩƫƣȵƥƘƜƘƟ Papageorgiou, ƾƢƔƖƏƖơƜ in 4 recepto 5 ƝƔƣƦƘƣơʝƥƔ] ƾƟƘƩơμƐƟƚ T

954 (ǏƥƦƜʬƦƜƤ): ǎƢȴ Ʀơʝ ơDzƝơƧ ƦơȹƦơƧ. L 1 lm. add. Elmsley

955 (ƾƢơƜƝȵƥƘƜƘƟ ǎƝ ƦȷƢƫƟ): ƾƢơƩƫƣȵƥƘƜƘƟ ǎƝ ƦơȹƦƫƟ ƦʬƟ ƦȷƢƫƟ. L 1 lm. add. Elmsley

957 (ƦƔƣƕƔƞȱƔ): μȲ ǎƟƘƖƝơʝƥƔ ƦȲƟ ƛȱƔƟ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Papageorgiou

verbum ƢƘƣƒƨơƕơƤ scholio praefixit T

214

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

959 ƗƧƥƔƢƔƞƞȯƝƦơƜƤ : ƗƧƥƜȯƦơƜƤ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. deest in T

959–61 ǎƢƘȴ ǎƟ ƗƧƥƔƢƔƞƞƏƝƦơƜƤ – ƛƐƔμƔ : ƞȱƖơƧƥƜ ƖȮƣ ƢƔμμȱƖƘƛȱƤ ƦƜ ƝƔƝȶƟ ƢƞƚƥȵơƟ ƢơƧ ƦʀƤ ơǮƝȵƔƤ ƩƫƣƘʎƟ ƗƧƥƜȯƦơƧƤ ǾƗȹƟƔƤ ǟμʎƟ ǎƨƘƞƝȷμƘƟơƟ. L T 1 lm. scripsi: ƩƫƣƘʎƟ Ƣƣȶ ƗƮμƫƟ ƞƐƖơƧƥƜƟ (v. 960) L: deest in T ƖȮƣ scripsi (cf. ad sch. 112–3.4): ƦƜ L: om. T (vide notam sequentem) ƞƐƖơƧƥƜ ƖȮƣ] ǎƢƘȴ ƞ. T 1 ƞƐƖơƧƥƜ – 2 ƝƔƝȶƟ] ƞƐƖơƧƥƜ [ƦƜ] ƢƔμμƐƖƘƛƐƤ ƦƜ ƝƔƝȶƟ Papageorgiou: ƞƐƖơƧƥƒ ƦƜ ƢƔμμƐƖƘƛƘƤ [ƦƜ] ƝƔƝȶƟ Lascaris et Blaydes 207: ƞƐƖơƧƥƒ ƦƜ, ƢƔμμƐƖƘƛƐƤ ƦƜ ƝƔƝƮƟ, Wolff 60

961 (ǂƥƢƘƦơƟ): μȱƖƔ ƝƔȴ ǂƢƜƥƦơƟ. L Ts.l. 1 μƐƖƔ: cf. sch. Hom. Il. 17.332; Hesych. Ɣ 7765 ǂƥƢƘƦơƤŭ … μƐƖƔƤ 1 lm. add. Elmsley

963 ƢƣơȒƝƞƔƜơƟ [ǾƠȹƨƫƟơƤ]: ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƢƣơƝƞƔȵơƧƥƜƟ. ǿ ƩơƣȶƤ ƔǮƥƛȯƟƘƦƔƜ Ʀơʝ ǧƣƔƝƞȱơƧƤ ƢƞƚƥȵơƟ ƨƘƣơμȱƟơƧ ƝƔȴ ƢƞƑƛơƧƤ ƛƣƚƟơȹƟƦƫƟ ǎƢƔƝơƞơƧƛơʝƟƦơƤ ƔȎƦʭ. L T 2 ƾƖƩơʝ per ƢƞƚƥƒơƟ explanatur in sch. D Hom. Il. 2.173 ƾƖƩơʝ: … ƢƞƚƥƒơƟ; ibid. 3.129 ǂƖƩơƧ: ƢƞƚƥƒơƟ; Hesych. Ɣ 928 ƾƖƩơʝ …ŭ ƢƞƚƥƒơƟ … 1 lm. L decurtavit Brunck2: deest in T ƾƟƦȴ – ƢƣơƝƞƔƒơƧƥƜƟ om. T ƢƣơȒƝƞƔƜơƟ de hospitibus qui ingrediuntur intellexit scholiasta 2 ƛƣƚƟơƯƟƦƫƟ] ƛƣ. ƝƔȴ T 2– 3 ƢƞƑƛơƧƤ … ǎƢƔƝơƞơƧƛơʝƟƦơƤ Nauck 434: ƢƞʀƛơƤ ... ǎƢƔƝơƞơƧƛơƯƟƦƫƟ codd.: ƢƞƑƛơƧƤ ... ǎƢƔƝơƞơƧƛơƯƟƦƫƟ dubitanter Papageorgiou xvii et Bernardakis 62

215

sch. 959 – sch. 971–2

964 ƠȱƟƫƟ ƖȮƣ ǎƠȷμƜƞơƤ : ǎƝ ƦʀƤ ƕƔƗȵƥƘƫƤ ƥƧƟʀƝƘƟ Ʀȶ ƨƔƜƟȷμƘƟơƟ ǂƛƣơƜƥμƔ ƠȱƟƫƟ ƾƟƗƣʬƟ ƘǴƟƔƜŭ † ơǵơƟ ƕȯƗƜƥƜƤ ƠȱƟƫƟ ƾƟƗƣʬƟ ǎƥƦƜ ƝƔȴ ǂƞƞơƧ ƢƞȳƛơƧƤ ƥƧƟƐƥƦƚƝƘƟ. † L T 1 lm. deest in T, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 963 copulet (ǎƝ ƦʀƤ ƕƔƗƒƥƘƫƤ ƗƐ); accuratiss. 964 ƠƐƟƫƟ – ƕƏƥƜƤ 2 ƠƐƟƫƟ] ƦʬƟ Ơ. T 2 ƘǴƟƔƜ – fin. om. T post ǎƥƦƜ add. ǿ ƖȮƣ ƥƦƮƞơƤ ǎƠ ŹȎƕơƐƫƟ Wolff 144 post ƝƔȴ add. ǎƠ Bernardakis 62 (cf. Blaydes 208) ƝƔȴ – fin.] ǟ ǂƞƞơƧ ƢƞƑƛơƧƤ ƥƧƟƘƥƦƚƝƧʎƔ temptavi

965 Ƣɲ ƗŪ ƔȔ ƨơƣƘʎ ƟƜƟ; : Ƣơʝ, ƨƚƥȵ, ƝƔȴ ƨȱƣƘƜ ƔȎƦȶƟ ǿ ȃμƜƞơƤ; ȟƤ ƖȮƣ ȏƢȰƣ ƨȵƞơƧ ƝƚƗơμȱƟƚƟ ǂƪơƨơƟ ƨȱƣƘƜ ƦȲƟ ƕȯƥƜƟ. L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. 965–7 Ƣɲ – ƕƏƥƜƟ transp. T

ƝƔȴ om. T

2 ǂƪơƨơƟ post ƕƏƥƜƟ

968 (ǂƟƔƧƗơƤ): μƚƗȰ ƨƫƟȲƟ ƢƣơȱƥƛƔƜ ƗƧƟȯμƘƟơƤ. L T 1 lm. add. Lascaris μƚƗȰ] μȲ ƗȰ T

969 Ʀȵ ƩƣƑ, ƛƔƟȷƟƦƔ ƟƜƟ : Ʀȵ, ƨƚƥȵ, ƗƘʎ ƝƣʎƟƔƜ ƢƘƣȴ ƔȎƦơʝ ƝƔȴ Ʀȵ ǂƟ ƦƜƤ ƗơƠȯƥƘƜƘƟ; ƢȷƦƘƣơƟ ƦȱƛƟƚƝƘƟ Ǡ ȓƢƟʪ ƕƘƕȯƢƦƜƥƦƔƜ; L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. 969–70 ƦƜ ƩƣƑ – ƝƣʎƟƔƜ;

971–2 (ɠμơƜ – μƐƞƘơƤ): țƞƞơƤ ƾƢƔƟƦȳƥƔƤ Ʀʭ ƢƔƦƣȴ ƛƣƚƟƘʎ. L T 1 lm. addidi țƞƞơƤ] ǿ țƞ. T ƾƢƔƟƦƑƥƔƤ] ȏƢƔƟƦƑƥƔƤ T

216

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

973 (Ʀȵ ƗȰ μȳƥơμƔƜ;): Ʀȵ ƦƘƩƟȯƥơμƔƜ ȃƢƫƤ ƥƫƛƘȵƚƤ; L Ts.l. 1 ƦƘƩƟƏƥơμƔƜ: cf. Hesych. μ 1147 μƑƗƘƥƛƔƜŭ ƦƘƩƟƑƥƔƥƛƔƜ 1 lm. add. Elmsley Ʀƒ om. Ƈ de forma ƦƘƩƟƏƥơμƔƜ vide ad sch. 831–2.3 de modo vide ad sch. El. 526.3

ƥƫƛƘƒƚƤ]

974 ƥȵƖƔ, ƦȱƝƟơƟ: ƖȱƣƫƟ ƦƜƤ ƾƝơƞơƧƛʬƟ Ʀʭ ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ ƾƢȶ ŹȎƕơȵƔƤ ƢƣȶƤ ƦȶƟ țƞƞơƟ ƨƚƥȵŭ μȲ ƾƟƘƖƘȵƣɾƤ ƔȎƦȷƟ. ƦơʝƦơ ƖȮƣ ƔDzƦƜơƟ ǾƗȹƟƚƤ ƦơʎƤ ƝȯμƟơƧƥƜƟ. L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. 974–5 ƥƒƖƔ - ƢƔƦƣƮƤ

975 (ȞμȷƨƣơƟơƤ): ǎƝ ƦʬƟ ǾƗƧƟʬƟ ǞƖƣƜƫμȱƟơƧ. L 1 lm. add. Brunck2

976a ƙʁ ƖȮƣ ƢƣơƢƘƦȳƤ : ƢƣơƢƘƦȲƤ ƘǮƤ ƦȶƟ ƛȯƟƔƦơƟ ƢƣơƟƘƟƘƧƝȺƤ Ǡ ƢƔƣƘƜμȱƟơƤ. L T 1 ƢƣơƟƘƧƟƘƧƝưƤ: cf. sch. Eur. Alc. 909 ǢƗƚ ƢƣơƢƘƦȲƤ ȢƟ: ǢƗƚ ƢƣơƟƘƟƘƧƝȺƤ ǎƢȴ ƦȮƤ ƢơƞƜȮƤ ƩƔƒƦƔƤ...; id. Hec. 150 (ad lm. ƦƯμƕʪ ƢƣơƢƘƦʀ): ƢƣơƟƘƟƘƧƝƧʎƔƟ 1 lm. deest in T, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 974 coniungat (ƢƣơƢƘƦȲƤ ƗȰ)

976b (ƢƣơƢƘƦƑƤ): ƘǮƤ ƦȲƟ ƖʀƟ ƢƘƥȺƟ Ǡ ǎƢȴ ƢƣȷƥƫƢơƟ ƝơƜμȻμƘƟơƤ Ǡ ƝƔȴ μȷƟơƟ ƝƘȵμƘƟơƤ. L T 1 ƘǮƤ ƦȲƟ ƖʀƟ ƢƘƥưƟ: cf. sch. 701 ǎƢȴ ƢƣƮƥƫƢơƟ: cf. sch. Eur. Alc.909 … Ʀʭ ȂƟƦƜ ƖȮƣ ơǯ ƖȱƣơƟƦƘƤ ƢƣơƢƘƦƘʎƤ ƘǮƥƜƟ, ǎƢȴ ƢƣȷƥƫƢơƟ ƨƘƣȷμƘƟơƜ 1–2 haec cum sch. pr. coniuncta (ƝƔȴ ƘǮƤ T: sine voce coniunctiva L) separatim posui 1 lm. addidi ƦȲƟ om. T 1 ƝơƜμưμƘƟơƤ – 2 μƮƟơƟ om. T

sch. 973 – sch. 987

217

980 (ƨơƜƦȯƗƔ): ƦȲƟ μƔƟƜȻƗƚ. Ls.l. Ts.l. cf. sch. Ai. 59a ǎƖȺ ƗȰ ƨơƜƦʬƟƦŪ ǂƟƗƣƔ μƔƟƜȯƥƜƟ ƟȷƥơƜƤ: ǢƦơƜ μƔƜƟȷμƘƟơƟ· ƨơʎƦơƤ ƖȮƣ ǟ μƔƟȵƔ… 1 lm. add. Brunck2 ƦȲƟ om. T

981 ƾƞƞŪ ǎƢȵ μơƜ μƘƞȱʪ : ƾƞƞŪ ǎƟƛơƧƥƜɲ μơƜ Ʀʭ μƘƞȱʪ ǟ ƨƣȲƟ ƗƜȮ Ʀȶ ǂƢƞƘƦơƟ ƕȯƣơƤ. L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. 981–2 ƾƞƞŪ – ƨƣƑƟ; scholiastam legisse ǎμμƐμƚƟƘ pro ǎμμƐμơƟƘ coni. Valckenaer 75v μơƜ T: μƘ L

981–2 (ƾƞƞŪ – ƨƣƑƟ): ǎƟ ǎƢƜƛƧμȵɯ, ƨƚƥȵƟ, ǒƩƫ Ʀȶ ƕȯƣơƤ ƝƔȴ ƥƜƫƢɱƟ ơȎ ƗȹƟƔμƔƜ. L T 1 ǎƟ ǎƢƜƛƧμƒɯ ... ǒƩƫ: cf. Hesych. μ 814 μȱμơƟƘ· ƛȱƞƘƜ…. 1–2 haec a sch. pr. separavi; nam h.l. alio modo ordo verborum construitur: ƨƣȲƟ ǎμμƐμơƟƘ ǂƢƞƘƦơƟ ƕƏƣơƤ ǎƢƒ μơƜ μƘƞƐʪ 1 lm. addidi

983–4 Ȥ źƘʝ, | Ƣơʎ ƖɱƤ ǣƝƫũ : ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ ȟƤ ǎƠƔƟƔƥƦȮƤ ƝƔȴ ƾƖƟơʬƟ Ƣơʝ μƘƦƘƟȳƟƘƝƦƔƜ. L T 1 lm.] Ȥ źƘʝ T ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ] ǧƣ. ƦƔʝƦƔ ƨƚƥȴƟ T

987 (ǟ ƗŪ ƔȔ μƜƔƣȮ ƕƣȹƝƘƜ): ǎƥƛȵƘƜ μƘ ǟ ƟȷƥơƤ ƝƔȴ ƾƟƔƞȵƥƝƘƜ. L; cf. gll. in Ts.l. cf. sch. Ph. 745 ƕƣƯƝơμƔƜ] ǎƥƛƒơμƔƜ, ƝƔƦƔƟƔƞƒƥƝơμƔƜ; sch. Ar. Lys. 367a ƕƣȹƝơƧƥƔ] ǎƥƛȵơƧƥƔ, ƗȯƝƟơƧƥƔ…; id. Av. 26 ƕƣȹƝơƧƥŪ] ǎƥƛȵơƧƥƔ; Hesych. ƕ 1238 ƕƣȹƝƘƜƟ· ƞȯƕƣƫƤ ǎƥƛȵƘƜƟ. ƾƢȶ Ʀơʝ ƦƣȵƙƘƜƟ ƦơȸƤ ǾƗȷƟƦƔƤ. ơǯ ƗȰ μƔƥɱƥƛƔƜ; Su. ƕ 573 ŶƣƯƝơƧƥƔ: ǎƥƛƒơƧƥƔ, ƗƏƝƟơƧƥƔ; Eust. Od. II 195, 38–9 ȃƣƔ Ʀȶ ƕƣȹƝƫƟ, ǢƖơƧƟ ƦƣƔƩȱƫƤ μƘƦȮ ƢơƜơʝ ƦƜƟȶƤ ǢƩơƧ ǎƥƛȵƫƟ, ơȕ ƩƣʀƥƜƤ ǎƟ ƦơʎƤ Ʀơʝ ƝƫμƜƝơʝ ȊƣƟƜƥƜƟ

218

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

1 lm. addidi; (ǟ ƗŪ s.) L 1 ǎƥƛƒƘƜ – fin.] ƟƮƥơƤ gl. ad ǟ ƗŪ ƔȔ et ǎƥƛƒƘƜ ƝƔȴ ƾƟƔƞƒƥƝƘƜ gll. ad ƕƣƯƝƘƜ nec plura T

988 DŽƣŪ ǎƠɿƗƚƤ : ƢƣȶƤ ƦȶƟ țƞƞơƟ ƞȱƖƘƜŭ DŽƣƔ, ƨƚƥȵƟ, ȃƥơƟ ǤƟ ƝȱƣƗơƤ Ʀȶ ƥƜƫƢɱƟ ǒƖƟƫƤ ƝƔȴ μȲ ƗƜƔƥƝƘƗȯƥƔƜ ƦȶƟ ȓƢƟơƟ; L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. 988–91 DŽƣƔ – ȓƢƟơƟ; ƞƐƖƘƜ] ƨƚƥȴƟ T DŽƣƔ T: ǂƣƔ L ƨƚƥȴƟ om. T 2 ǒƖƟƫƤ ante ȃƥơƟ transp. T ƗƜƔƥƝƘƗƏƥƔƜ] Ɨ. ƾƢŪ ƔȎƦơʝ T

991 ơȎ ƖȮƣ ǒƩƫ ƢʬƤ ǂƟ : ƾƗƧƟȯƦƫƤ ǒƩƫ ƝƔƣƦƘƣƘʎƟ ǎƢȴ ƦƚƞƜƝơȹƦʪ ƝƔƝʭ. LT 1 lm. deest in T, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 988 coniungat praefixis verbis ǿ ƗȰ ƨƚƥƒƟ; accuratiss. 991–2 ơȎ ƖƏƣ – ƞƘƯƥƥƫƟ

993 Ȥ žƚƟƔȵƔ ƝƣƚƢȵƤ : ƝƣƚƢȵƤ Ʀȶ ǒƗƔƨơƤ, ƢƘƣƜƨƣƔƥƦƜƝʬƤ ƗȰ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ Ȥ žȳƟƔƜơƟŭ μȱμƨƘƦƔƜ ƗȰ Ʀʭ ƦȷƢʪ ȃƦƜ ơȎƝ ǎƢȴ ƔǮƥȵơƜƤ ƔȎƦʭ ƖȱƖơƟƘƟ ƦȮ ǎƝƘʎ ƛȹμƔƦƔŭ ơdzƔƟ ơȔƟ, ƨƚƥȵ, ƩȯƣƜƟ ƾƢȶ ƦʬƟ ƛƧμȯƦƫƟ ƗƜƘƢƣȯƠƫ! L T; cf. etiam gll. in Ts.l. 1 lm. deest in T; scholiastae defuisse ƾƟƦƒ coni. Hermann 171; accuratiss. 993–5 Ȥ – ǞƟƯƥƫ (Ȥ źƘʝ cum sequentibus coniunxit scholiasta) 1 ƝƣƚƢȵƤ (alt.) – 2 žƑƟƔƜơƟ] haec om. in margine, sed retractata ƢƘƣƜƨƣƔƥƦƜƝʬƤ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ Ȥ žƑƟƔƜơƟ ǒƗƔƨơƤ ut gl. ad Ȥ žƚƟƔƒƔ ƝƣƚƢȴƤ ƕƫμʬƟ praebuit T 2 ƗȰ om. T, quippe qui priorem partem scholii a reliqua enarratione seiunxisset Ʀʭ ƦƮƢʪ] ƦȶƟ ƦƮƢơƟ T 3 ơdzƔƟ ơȔƟ, ƨƚƥƒ,] ƝƔƒ ƨƚƥƜ, ơdzƔƟ T

995–6 Ȥ źƘʝ, | ơdzƔƟ μŪ ǂƣŪ ǒƛơƧ ƞȻƕƔƟ : ơdzƔƟ μơƜ, ƨƚƥȵ, ƢƣơƥƘƦƣȵƪƫ ƕƞȯƕƚƟ, Ȥ źƘʝ, ƦȲƟ ƦƔʎƤ μƔƟȵƔƜƤ ƾƝμȯƙơƧƥƔƟŭ ƞȱƖƘƜ ƗȰ ƦƔʝƦƔ ƾƨơƣʬƟ ƘǮƤ Ʀȶ ǏƔƧƦơʝ ƥʬμƔ. L T 2 ƕƞƏƕƚƟ: cf. sch. Hom. Od. 2.323c … ȃƛƘƟ ƝƔȴ ƞưƕƚ ǟ ƕƞƏƕƚ …; sch. D Hom. Il. 19.208; Hesych. ƞ 1483 ƞưƕƚŭ ƕƞƏƕƚ …; ibid. ƞ 1481 ƞưƕƔƤŭ ƕƞƏƕƔƤ …; ibid. μ 627 … ƞʬƕƔƜŭ … ƕƞƏƕƔƜ; Ɔ ƞ 172 ƞưƕƚŭ ƕƞƏƕƚ … = Phot. ƞ 498

sch. 987 – sch. 1003a

219

1 lm. scripsit Wolff 11: ơdzƔƟ ƾƟƛŪ ơdzƫƟ ƛƧμƏƦƫƟ (v. 994) L: deest in T; accuratiss. 995–9 Ȥ źƘʝ – ƝƔƦƔƗƘƣƩƛʀƟƔƜ post ơdzƔƟ add. ƾƟƛŪ ơdzƫƟ T ƨƚƥƒ om. T 2 ƦƔʎƤ μƔƟƒƔƜƤ] ǎƟ μƔƟƒƔƜƤ T

998 (ƾƝȳƞƚƦơƟ): ƾƟȵƔƦơƟ, ƾƝƔƦƔƢƣȯƧƟƦơƟŭ ƾƢȶ ƝơƜƟơʝ ƗȰ Ʀȶ ȢƨƘƞơƟ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Brunck2

1 ƾƢȶ – fin.] om. T; i.e. ȢƨƘƞơƟ spectat ad ƢƣơƥƜƗƘʎƟ et

ƝƔƦƔƗƘƣƩƛʀƟƔƜ

999 (μƔƟƒƔƤ ǂƟƛơƤ) ƝƔƦƔƗƘƣƩƛʀƟƔƜ : ƛƘƫƣʀƥƔƜ, ǮƗƘʎƟ ƦȲƟ ƾƝμȲƟ ƦʀƤ μƔƟȵƔƤ. L 1 cf. sch. 1089 ubi ǢƟƛƚƝƘƟ per ǢƝμƔƥƘƟ explicatur 1 lm. L supplevi

1000 ƦȵƤ ƖȮƣ ƾơƜƗȷƤ : ƦȵƤ, ƨƚƥȵƟ, ǎƢʪƗȶƤ Ǡ ǮƔƦƣȶƤ ƗƜȮ ƩƘƜƣʬƟ ƦȲƟ ƦȱƩƟƚƟ ƦʀƤ ǮƔƦƣƜƝʀƤ ǎƟƗƘƜƝƟȹμƘƟơƤ ƛƘƣƔƢƘȹƥƘƜ Ʀȶ ƢȯƛơƤ μơƧ, ƘǮ μȲ ǿ źƘȸƤ ƕơȹƞơƜƦơ; L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. 1000–2 ƦƜƤ ƖƏƣ – ƝƔƦƔƝƚƞƑƥƘƜ;

1003a ƛƔʝμŪ ǀƟ ƢȷƣƣƫƛƘƟ : ǣƗƜƥƦƔ ǂƟ, ƝƔȴ ƘǮ μƔƝƣȷƛƘƟ μƘƦƔƢȱμƪơƜƦȷ ƦƜƤ ƦȶƟ ƛƘƣƔƢƘȹƥơƟƦƔ, ƛƘƔƥƔȵμƚƟ. L T 1–2 sch. 1003a et 1003b in unum composita ita retractavit T: ǣƗƜƥƦƔ ǂƟ, ƨƚƥƒ, ƛƘƔƥƔƒμƚƟ ƘǮ μƔƝƣƮƛƘƟ ƦȶƟ ƛƘƣƔƢƘƯƥơƟƦƔ μƘƦƔƢƐμƪƔƜƦƮ ƦƜƤ ȏμʬƟ ǣƗƜƥƦƔ] ǣƝƜƥƦƔ Wolff 200 μƘƦƔƢƐμƪơƜƦơ] μƘƦƔƢƐμƪƔƜƦơ T 2 ƛƘƣƔƢƘƯƥơƟƦƔ T: ƛƘƣƔƢƘƯƥƔƟƦƔ L

220

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

1003b (ƢƮƣƣƫƛƘƟ): μƘƦƔƢƘμƪƔμƐƟƫƟ ȏμʬƟ. L 1 haec a sch. pr. seiunxi lm. addidi in initio scholii subauditur ƞƘƒƢƘƜ

1005a (ƗȹƥμơƣơƟ): ƖƣȯƨƘƦƔƜ ȓƥƦƔƦơƟ. L 1 lm. add. Lascaris

Ɩƣ. L

1005b (ƘȎƟɱƥƔƜ): Ǡ Ʀȶ ƝƔƛƘƧƗʀƥƔƜ Ǡ Ʀȶ ƾƢơƛƔƟƘʎƟ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris; (ƘȎƟɱƥƔƜ s.) L Ǡ Ʀȶ (pr.) om. Ƈ Ʀȶ (alt.) om. Ƈ

1007a1 Ƣɲ μơƧ ƪƔȹƘƜƤ;: ȟƤ ǎƨƔƢƦơμȱƟơƧ ƔȎƦơʝ Ʀơʝ ƢƔƜƗȶƤ ǎƢȴ Ʀʭ ƖƟʬƟƔƜ ƢʬƤ ǒƩƘƜ Ʀʭ ƥȻμƔƦƜ. Ƣơʎ ƪƔȹƘƜƤ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƢƔʝƘ ƪƚƞƔƨʬƟ ƝƔȴ μƘƦƔƨȱƣƫƟ ƦʁƗƘ ƝƾƝƘʎƥƘ Ʀȶ ƥʬμȯ μơƧ. L 2 ƪƔƯƘƜƟ per ƪƚƞƔƨɱƟ explanatur etiam in Hesych. ƪ 77 ƪƔƯƘƦƔƜŭ ƪƚƞƔƨɱƦƔƜ (lm) 2 ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ – fin. ad 1007 Ƣɲ – ƝƞƒƟƘƜƤ; spectat 1 scholiastam ƝƜƟƘʎƤ apud poetam pro ƝƞƒƟƘƜƤ legisse e μƘƦƔƨƐƣƫƟ (3) coni. Zielinski 57 coll. etiam sch. 1009a.1 et sch. 1010a.1, sed coniectura necessaria non esse videtur ǎƢȴ Ʀʭ Stephanus 367: ǎƢȴ Ʀȶ L

1007a2 (Ƣɲ μơƧ ƪƔƯƘƜƤ;): Ƣơʝ ƢƣơƥȯƖƘƜƤ ƦȮƤ ƩƘʎƣƔƤ; L Ts.l. 1 lm. addidi ƩƘʎƣƔƤ] Ʃ. ƥơʝ Ƈ

1009a ƾƟƦȱƦƣơƨƔƤ : ȃ ƦƜ ǀƟ ǟƥƧƩȯƥɾ Ʀơʝ ƝƔƝơʝ ƦơȹƦơƧ, ƢȯƞƜƟ ƝƜƟȳƥƔƤ ƾƟȱƦƣƘƪƔƤ. L 1 lm. accuratiss. 1008 ƾƟƦƐƦƣơƨƔƤ – μƯƥɾ

2 ƾƟƐƦƣƘƪƔƤ Lascaris: ƾƟƔƦƣƐƪƔƤ L

sch. 1003b – sch. 1010–1

221

1009b (ƾƟƦƐƦƣơƨƔƤ – μƯƥɾ): ơǵơƟ ȃ ƦƜ ǀƟ ƦʬƟ ǾƗƧƟʬƟ ƢƔƯƥɾ, ƦơʝƦơ ƗƜȳƖƘƜƣƔƤ. L 1–2 haec a sch. pr. separavi

1 lm. addidi

ƢƔƯƥƚ L: supra ƢƔƯƥƚ praebet μƯƥƚ L

1010a (ǥƢƦƔȵ μơƧ): Ʀȶ ƝƜƟƚƛʀƟƔƜ ȏƢȶ ƥơʝ ƝƔƛȳƪƔƦȷ μơƧ. L; cf. gll. in Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley Ʀȶ ƝƜƟƚƛʀƟƔƜ – fin.] ƝƔƛƑƪƔƦơ gl. ad ǥƢƦƔƒ μơƧ et ǎƟ Ʀʭ ƝƜƟƚƛʀƟƔƒ μƘ ȏƢȶ ƥơʝ gl. ad ǣƗŪ ƔȔƛŪ ǓƣƢƘƜ nec plura Ƈ

1010b (ǣƗŪ ƔȔƛŪ ǓƣƢƘƜ): ǟ ƟȷƥơƤ, ƨƚƥȵ, ƢȯƞƜƟ ǎƢȵƝƘƜƦƔƜ. L 1 lm. add. Elmsley; (ǡ ƗŪ s.) L

1010–1 ƢȷƛƘƟ ǒƥƦŪ, Ȥ | ǛƞƞƔƟƘƤ ƢȯƟƦƫƟ : ơȎ ƢƣȶƤ ƦơȸƤ ƨȱƣơƟƦȯƤ ƨƚƥƜƟ ƾƞƞȮ ƝƔƛȷƞơƧ ƢƣȶƤ ƢȯƟƦƔƤ ƦơȸƤ ƘȎƘƣƖƘƦƚƛȱƟƦƔƤ ƢƣʫƚƟ ȏƢŪ ƔȎƦơʝ. Ƣơʝ, ƨƚƥȵƟ, DŽƣƔ ǎƥƦȱ, Ȥ ƢȯƟƦƫƟ ǛƞƞƚƟƘƤ ƾƗƜƝȻƦƔƦơƜ, ƦơƧƦȱƥƦƜƟ ƾƩƔ-ƣƜƥƦȷƦƔƦơƜ, ơȑƤ ǎƖȺ Ƣʁ μȰƟ ƝƔƦȮ ƛȯƞƔƦƦƔƟ Ƣʁ ƗȰ ǎƟ Ɩʁ 5 ƥʫƙƫƟ, ƢȯƟƦƔ ƦȷƢơƟ ƝƔƛƔȵƣƫƟ ȏƢȰƣ ƥƫƦƚƣȵƔƤ ǎƝƘȵƟƫƟ, ǎƖƖȸƤ ƛƔƟȯƦơƧ ǎƖƘƟȷμƚƟ; ƦȲƟ ƗȰ ǎƝ ƦȷƢơƧ ƥƩȱƥƜƟ ƘǴƢƘƟ ƾƟƦȴ ƦʀƤ ǎƟ ƦȷƢʪ ȟƤ

ƥƩƘƗȷƛƘƟ Ɨȱ ơǯ ǤƞƛƘƟ džƛȳƟƚ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƥƩƘƗȷƟ. L T 5 ƦȲƟ ƗȰ ǎƝ ƦƮƢơƧ –fin.: cf. Apollon. Dysc. Adv. 185, 23 – 186, 1; ibid. 208, 30 – 209, 3; id. Pron. 66, 20 – 67, 2; sch. ŵnt. 521… ŵDzƔƤ ǎƖƖƯƛƘƟ (Ż 219) ǤƞƛƘ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ 7 Hom. Od. 2.267, ǎƖƖƯƤ…; sch. Hom. Od. 2.267c. ƥƩƘƗƮƛƘƟ: ƢƞƚƥƒơƟ, ǎƖƖƯƤ… 13.221, 20.30 1 lm. ex L: deest in Ƈ; pars Ƣơʝ (3) – fin. ad 1010–3 ƢƮƛƘƟ ǒƥƦŪ – ȞƞƘƝƮμƔƟ ǿ ƦƏƞƔƤ spectat (lm.) ǛƞƞƔƟƘƤ ƢƏƟƦƫƟ Sophocli restituit Koechly (ZA 9 (1842) 787) et hoc vel simile quid pro ƢƏƟƦƫƟ ǗƞƞƏƟƫƟ (L) legisse scholiastam conicias ƨƐƣơƟƦƔƤ] ƨ. ƔȎƦȶƟ Ƈ 3 ƨƚƥƒƟ om. Ƈ DŽƣƔ] ǂƣƔ Ƈ ǎƥƦƐ ante DŽƣƔ transp. Ƈ ǛƞƞƚƟƘƤ scripsi: ǗƞƞƑƟƫƟ codd. 4 ơȑƤ] malim ơǵƤ sed scholiasta eo quod in libro suo invenit, i.e. ơȓƤ, utitur ǎƟ Ɩʁ] ƝƔƦȮ ƖʀƟ Ƈ ƥʫƙƫƟ scripsi: ǒƥʪƙơƟ L, quo recepto post ƢƏƟƦƔ add. ƦƘ

222

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

Bernardakis 62: ǒƥʪƙơƟ ƝƔȴ Ƈ Bernardakis 62, at cf. sch. 1013a.1

5 ǎƝƘƒƟƫƟ] ȏμʬƟ Ƈ 6 ȟƤ] ȟƤ Ʀȶ Ƈ

ǎƖƘƟƮμƚƟ] ǎƖƜƟƮμƚƟ

1010 (ƢȷƛƘƟ): ƾƟƦȴ Ƣơʝ. Ls.l. vide sch. 1010–1.6 ƦȲƟ ƗȰ – fin. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

1013a (ȞƞƘƝȷμƔƟ): ǒƝƔμƟơƟ ƝƔȴ ǎƖƖȸƤ ƛƔƟȯƦơƧ ǎƖƘƟȷμƚƟ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Brunck2 1.5

ǎƖƘƟƮμƚƟ] ǎƖƜƟƮμƚƟ Ƈ, coni. iam Bernardakis 62, at cf. sch. 1010–

1013b ƝƔȴ ƟʝƟ ǎƢȴ ƦʭƗƘ ƟơƥơʝƟƦƜ : ƝƔȴ ƟʝƟ, ƨƚƥȵƟ, ơȎƗƘȴƤ ǎƝƘȵƟƫƟ ǎƢŪ ǎμơȴ ƟơƥơʝƟƦƜ ơȎ Ƣʝƣ, ơȎ ƠȵƨơƤ ƥƫƦȳƣƜơƟ ƢƣơƥƔƖƔƖȺƟ ƾƢƔƞƞȯƠƘƜ μƘ Ʀơʝ ƙʀƟ; L T 1 lm. deest in Ƈ; accuratiss. 1013–4 ƝƔȴ ƟʝƟ – ƦƣƐƪƘƜ; ƟʝƟ ǎƝƘƒƟƫƟ Ƈ

ƝƔȴ – ǎƝƘƒƟƫƟ] ơȎƗƘƒƤ ƨƚƥƜ

1013c (ƦʭƗƘ): ƗƘƜƝƦƜƝʬƤ ƾƟƦȴ ǎμơȵ. L Ts.l. ƗƘƜƝƦƜƝʬƤ: cf. sch. Aesch. Th. 651f ƦʬƟƗƘ] ƖƣƏƨƘƦƔƜ ƦʭƗƘ, ǢƖơƧƟ ǎμơȴ ƗƘƜƝƦƜƝʬƤ; sch. Eur. Alc. 1090 (ad lm. ƦʭƗƘ) ƗƘƜƝƦƜƝʬƤ, ǎμơƒ; id. Med. 1337 (ad lm. ƦʭƗƘ) ƗƘƜƝƦƜƝʬƤ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǎμơȴ … 1 lm. add. Elmsley; (ǎƢƒ s.) L ƾƟƦȴ] ƾƟ. Ʀơʝ Ƈ

1014a (ơȎ Ƣʝƣ): ƞƘȵƢƘƜ ƢƣơƥƔƖƔƖȻƟ. L 1 lm. add. Elmsley

sch. 1010–1 – sch. 1018b

223

1014b (ǾƟȳƥƜμơƟ): ȞƨƘƞȳƥƜμơƟ, ƥƫƦȳƣƜơƟ. Ls.l. Ts.l. Su. ơ 356 ȆƟȳƥƜμơƤ: ȞƨȱƞƜμơƤ... 1 lm. add. Elmsley

1015 ơȎƗŪ ƾƢƔƣȯƠƔƜ : ơȎƗƘȴƤ ǎƝƘȵƟƫƟ, ƨƚƥȵ, ƕơȹƞƘƦƔƜ ǎƞƛȺƟ ƦȲƟ ƝƘƨƔƞȳƟ μơƧ ƾƢơƦƘμƘʎƟ ƝƔȴ ǎƞƘƧƛƘƣʬƥƔƜ Ʀơʝ μơƩƛƚƣơʝ ƕȵơƧ. L; cf. gll. in Ts.l. 2 ƾƢơƦƘμƘʎƟ: cf. Hesych. Ɣ 5792 ƾƢƏƣƔƠƘƟŭ ƾƢƐƦƘμƘƟ 1 (lm.) ƾƢƔƣƏƠƔƜ ſ: ƾƢƔƣƏƠ compendiose L (ƾƢƔƣƏƠƔƜ apud poetam); accuratiss. 1015–6 ơȎƗŪ – ƥƦƧƖƘƣơʝ 1 ơȎƗƘȴƤ – 2 ƾƢơƦƘμƘʎƟ] ƾƢơƦƘμƘʎƟ gl. ad ƾƢƔƣƏƠƔƜ nec plura Ƈ 2 ƝƔȴ – fin.] μơƩƛƚƣơʝ, μƜƥƚƦơʝ gll. ad ƥƦƧƖƘƣơʝ nec plura Ƈ

1017 (Ȥ ƢƔʎ): ƘǵƤ ƦʬƟ ƖƘƣȷƟƦƫƟ ƾƝơƞơƧƛʬƟ ǎƠ ŹȎƕơȵƔƤ Ʀʭ ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ ƢƣȶƤ ƦȶƟ țƞƞơƟ ƨƚƥȵ. L 1 lm. add. Elmsley

1018a ƦơȔƣƖơƟ ƦȷƗƘ μƘʎƙơƟ ƾƟȳƝƘƜ : Ʀȶ ƕơƚƛʀƥƔƜ Ǡ ƕƔƥƦȯƠƔƜ ƦȶƟ ǧƣƔƝƞȱƔ μƘʎƙȷƟ ǎƥƦƜƟ Ǡ ƝƔƦŪ ǎμȱ. L; cf. gl. in Ts.l. 1 lm. accuratiss. 1018–9 ƦơȔƣƖơƟ – ʜưμƚƟ ƔȎƦȶƟ gl. ad ƦơȔƣƖơƟ ƦȷƗƘ nec plura Ƈ

Ʀȶ – fin.] Ʀȶ ƕơƚƛʀƥƔƜ Ǡ ƕƔƥƦƏƥƔƜ

1018b ƾƟȳƝƘƜ [ƗȰ] ƾƟƦȴ ǿƣμɲŭ ȢƠƧƟƦƔƜ μƘʎƙơƟ, ƨƚƥȵƟ, Ǡ ƝƔƦȮ ƦȲƟ ǎμȲƟ ƗȹƟƔμƜƟŭ ƦơȔƣƖơƟ ƗȰ ƦȲƟ ƟȷƥơƟ ƨƚƥȵ. L; cf. gl. in Ts.l. 1–2 haec a sch. 1018a separavi; nam h.l. ƦơȔƣƖơƟ de morbo accipitur et ƾƟƑƝƘƜ sensu ǿƣμɲ, ȢƠƧƟƦƔƜ explanatur 1 ƗȰ delevi ƾƟƑƝƘƜ – fin.] ƾƟƦȴ ǿƣμɲ gl. ad ƾƟƑƝƘƜ nec plura Ƈ

224

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

1019 ƥȸ ƗȰ ƥȹƞƞƔƕƘ : ƥȸ ƖȮƣ ƟȱơƤ ƘǴ ƝƔȴ ǾƠȹƦƘƣȷƟ ƥơƜ Ʀȶ ȂμμƔ ƢƣȶƤ Ʀȶ ƥʫƙƘƜƟ ƦȶƟ ƢƔƦȱƣƔ μɱƞƞơƟ Ǡ ƗƜŪ ǎμơʝ. L 1 lm. accuratiss. 1019–20 ƥȸ ƗƐ – ƥʫƙƘƜƟ

1020a (ǒμƢƞƘơƟ): ǾƠȹƦƘƣơƟ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley (lm.) apud poetam habet ǒμƢƞƘƫƟ Ƈ

1020b ƪƔȹƫ μȰƟ ǒƖƫƖƘ : ƘǮ Ʀȶ ƝƔƦƔƥƩƘʎƟ ƔȎƦȶƟ ǮɱƦƔƜ, ǮƗơȸ ǎƨȯƢƦơμƔƜ ƔȎƦơʝ, DzƥƛƜ Ɨȱ, ƨƚƥȵƟ, ȃƦƜ ƦȲƟ ƞƔƛȵƢơƟơƟ DzƔƥƜƟ ƦʬƟ ǾƗƧƟʬƟ ơȒƦƘ ƗƜȮ ƥƦȷμƔƦơƤ ơȒƦƘ ǒƠƫƛƘƟ ƢƣơƥȯƢƦƘƜƟ ƗȹƟƔμƔƜŭ ơȎƝ ơǴƗƔ Ɩȯƣŭ ƦơƜƔʝƦƔ ƖȮƣ ƾƞƖȳμƔƦƔ ƗȵƗƫƥƜƟ ǿ źƘȹƤ. L 1 lm. accuratiss. 1020–2 ƪƔƯƫ – źƘƯƤ; scholiastam ǾƗƧƟɱƟ pro ǾƗƯƟƔƟ legisse e 3 ƦʬƟ ǾƗƧƟʬƟ conclusit Wolff 62 et ƞƔƛƒƢơƟơƟ pro neutro adiectivi pro substativo positi habuisse (i.e. Ʀȶ ƞƔƛƒƢơƟơƟ) 2–3 ƗƜȮ ƥƦƮμƔƦơƤ] optime defendunt Bernardakis 62 et Wansink 110 haec annotans: scholiasta ‘ǒƟƗơƛƘƟ et ƛƯƣƔƛƘƟ accepit de medicamentis

quae aut per os imbibuntur et intus adhibentur aut corpori oblinuntur et exterius applicantur’; scripturam libri defendit etiam Zielinski 57

1021–2 (ƞƔƛƒƢơƟơƟ – ƕƜƮƦơƧ): ƦȲƟ ǾƗȹƟƚƟ Ʀơʝ ƕȵơƧ ƔȎƦơʝ ƦȲƟ ƞƔƛȵƢơƟơƟ ǎƠƔƟȹƥƔƜ ơȎ ƗȹƟƔμƔƜ. L T 1 lm. addidi; hunc interpretem ǾƗƯƟƔƟ, non ǾƗƧƟɱƟ, legisse coni. Wolff 62 fin.] ƔȎƦơʝ, ƨƚƥƒƟ, ơȎ ƗƯƟƔμƔƜ ƞƔƛƒƢơƟơƟ ǎƠƔƟƯƥƔƜ Ƈ

ƔȎƦơʝ –

1021a (ƞƔƛȵƢơƟơƟ ƗŪ ǾƗƧƟɱƟ): ƞƘȵƢƘƜ ƨȯƣμƔƝơƟ. L 1 lm. add. Papageorgiou; grammaticum ǾƗƧƟɱƟ pro ǾƗƯƟƔƟ apud poetam invenisse coni. Wolff 62 ƨƏƣμƔƝơƟ Neue 590 prob. Wolff l.c.: ƨƔƣμƏƝơƧ L

sch. 1019 – sch. 1030

225

1021b ơȒƦŪ ǒƟƗơƛƘƟ ơȒƦƘ ƛȹƣƔƛƘƟ : ơȒƦƘ ƾƢŪ ǎμƔƧƦơʝ ơȒƦƘ ƾƢȷ ƦƜƟơƤ ƦʬƟ ƠȱƟƫƟ ƗȹƟƔμƔƜ ǎƠƔƟȹƥƔƜ. L T 1 ƾƢȶ – 2 ƠƐƟƫƟ: cf. Hesych ƛ 927 ƛƧƣƘƮƤŭ …ƝƔȴ ǿ ƠƐƟơƤ…; ibid. ƛ 925 ƛƧƣƔƒƔŭ … ƠƐƟƚ; Su. ƛ 603 ƛƧƣƔʎơƤ: ƠƐƟơƤ … 1 lm. scripsi post Wolff 62 qui scholiastam ƛƯƣƔƛƘƟ pro ƛƯƣƔƙƘ legisse coniecerat: ơȒƦŪ ǒƟƗơƛƘƟ ơȒƦƘ ƛƧ (compendiose) L: deest in Ƈ, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 1021– 2 coniungat 2 ƗȹƟƔμƔƜ ǎƠƔƟȹƥƔƜ om. T

1021c (ǒƟƗơƛƘƟ): ƗƜȮ ƥƦȷμƔƦơƤ. Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley ƗƜȮ ƥƦȷμƔƦơƤ] vide ad sch. 1020b.2–3

1023 (ȥ ƢƔʎ ): ƔǮƥƛȯƟƘƦƔƜ ƦʀƤ Ʀơʝ ƢƔƜƗȶƤ ƨƫƟʀƤ ǿ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ. L T 1 lm. addidi

1028a (ƛƣʫƥƝƘƜ): ƾƟƔƙƫƢƧƣƘʎƦƔƜ ǟ ƟȷƥơƤ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris ƾƟƔƙƫƢƧƣƘʎƦƔƜ] ƾƟƔƙƫơƢơƜƘʎƦƔƜ Ƈ

1028b (ƗƘƜƞƔȵƔ): ƗƘƜƞơƢơƜȷƤ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris

1030 (ƾƢơƦȵƕƔƦơƤ): ƾƢƣơƥƢȱƞƔƥƦơƤ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris

226

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

1031a (ǮȺ ƄƔƞƞƏƤ): ǎƢƜƝƔƞƘʎƦƔƜ ƦȲƟ džƛƚƟɱƟ ƘǮƤ ƕơȳƛƘƜƔƟ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris

1031b ǮȺ ƢƔʎ : ƝǀƟ ƥȹ, Ȥ ƢƔʎ, ƦȶƟ ƨȹƥƔƟƦƔ ơǮƝƦƘȵƣƔƤ ǎƢȵƥƢƔƥƔȵ μơƜ ƠȵƨơƤ ƾƟƘμȱƥƚƦơƟ, ǎƨŪ ɣ ơȎƗƘȵƤ ƥƘ μȱμƪƘƦƔƜ ȟƤ ƢƔƦƣơƝƦȷƟơƟ. L; cf. gll. in Ts.l. 1 ǎƢƒƥƢƔƥƔƜ: cf. e.g. sch. Hom. Il. 1.190 ǎƣƧƥƥƏμƘƟơƤ: ƥƢƔƥƏμƘƟơƤ; sch. D Hom. Il. 1.190 ǎƣƧƥƥƏμƘƟơƤ: ƥƢƔƥƏμƘƟơƤ; ibid. 3.271 ǎƣƧƥƥƏμƘƟơƤ: ƥƢƔƥƏμƘƟơƤ; Hesych. Ƙ 6041 ǎƣƧƥƏμƘƟơƤŭ ƥƢƔƥƏμƘƟơƤ (A 190) 1 lm. accuratiss. 1031–4 ǮȺ ƢƔʎ – ǒƖƩơƤ ƝǀƟ – fin.] ƾƟƘμƐƥƚƦơƟ gl. ad ƾƟƘƢƒƨƛơƟơƟ, ǎƢƒƥƢƔƥƔƒ μơƜ gl. ad ƘDzƣƧƥơƟ et ƠƒƨơƤ gl. ad ǒƖƩơƤ nec plura Ƈ

1036a1 (ǎƩȷƞƫƥƘƟ): ǎƢȵƥƥƫƥƘƟ. Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

1036a2 (ǎƩȷƞƫƥƘƟ): ƖƣȯƨƘƦƔƜ ǎƩȷƞƚƥƘƟ, ơǵơƟ Ʃơƞʁ ǒƩƣƜƥƘ ƦȶƟ ƩƜƦʬƟƔ. L 1 lm. deest in L Ɩƣ. L

1038–9 (ǁƟ ȥƗŪ – ƔȒƦƫƤ): ǡƟ DzƗơƜμƜ Ʀʭ ƔȎƦʭ ƟơƥȳμƔƦƜ ƢƘƣƜƢƘƥơʝƥƔƟ. L; cf. gl. in Ts.l. 1 lm. addidi; (ǁƟ s.) L nec plura Ƈ

Ʀʭ ƔȎƦʭ ƟơƥƑμƔƦƜ] Ʀʭ ƔȎƦʭ ƟơƥƑμƔƦƜ gl. ad ȥƗŪ ǎƢȵƗơƜμƜ

sch. 1031a – sch. 1052

227

1039 (ƔȒƦƫƤ): ǿμơȵƫƤ. Ls.l. 1 cf. sch. Hom. Il. 4.17b … ƔȒƦƫƤ …: ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǿμơƒƫƤ …; ibid. 1.133b; ibid. 24.413a; id. Od. 16.143 ƔȒƦƫƤ] … ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǿμơƒƫƤ …; sch. D Hom. Il. 2.138 ƔȒƦƫƤ: … ǿμơƒƫƤ; ibid. 3.220 ƔȒƦƫƤ: … ǿμơƒƫƤ; ibid. 3.339; ibid. 19.195; sch. Ap. Rh. 133, 7 1 lm. add. Elmsley, nisi quod ƔȓƦƫƤ pro ƔȒƦƫƤ scripsit; ƔȓƦƫƤ, cum spiritu aspero, apud poetam praebet L

1041 Ȥ ŸƜȶƤ ƔȎƛƔȵμƫƟ : Ȥ Ʀơʝ ŸƜȶƤ ƾƗƘƞƨƐ, džƬƗƫƟƘʝ. L 1 cf. Hesych. Ɣ 8258 ƔȒƛƔƜμơƜ· ƾƗƘƞƨơȵ (Soph. OC 1078); Phot. Ɣ 3167 ƔȒƛƔƜμơƤ· ... ƔȎƛƔȵμƫƟ ƗȰ ƆơƨơƝƞʀƤ (Tr. 1041); Su. Ɣ 4423 ƔȒƛƔƜμơƜ: ơǯ ƾƗƘƞƨơȴ

1042 (ȞƝƧƢȱƦɯ): ƦƔƩƘʎ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 cf. sch. D Hom. Il. 8.42 ȞƝƧƢƐƦƔ: ȞƝƧƢƐƦƔƤ, ƦƔƩƘʎƤ; Ɔ ƫ 15 ȞƝƧƢƐƦƔƤ: ƦơȸƤ ƦƔƩƘʎƤ = Su. ƫ 56 1 lm. add. Elmsley

1049 (ƥƦƧƖƟƮƤ): ƥƦƧƖƟơƢơƜȷƤ, ƗƜȮ ƦȮƤ ƦʬƟ ǂƛƞƫƟ ƢƣơƥƦȯƠƘƜƤ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley; (ƥƦƧƖƟƮƤ s.) L ƢƣơƥƦƔƖƏƤ Ƈ

ǿ ƥƦƧƖƟơƢơƜȶƤ ƗƜȮ ƦȮƤ ƦʬƟ ǂƞƞƫƟ (sic)

1052 (ƾμƨȵƕƞƚƥƦƣơƟ): ƦȶƟ ƩƜƦʬƟƔ ȟƤ ƾμƨȵƕƞƚƥƦƣơƟ. L; cf. gl. in Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris ƦȶƟ – fin.] ƦȶƟ ƩƜƦʬƟƔ ƞƐƖƘƜ gl. ad ƾμƨƒƕƞƚƥƦƣơƟ nec plura Ƈ

228

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

1053 (ƢƣơƥμƔƩƛȱƟ): ƢƣơƥƝơƞƞƚƛȱƟ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 ƢƣơƥƝơƞƞƚƛƐƟ: cf. sch. Ar. Eq. 815c ƢƣơƥƐμƔƠƘƟ: … ƢƣơƥƘƝƮƞƞƚƥƘƟ; Su. Ƣ 2636 ƢƣơƥƐμƔƠƘ: ƢƣơƥƘƝƮƞƞƚƥƘ 1 lm. add. Lascaris

1054 (ƾƣƦƚƣȵƔƤ): ƦȮƤ ƨƞȱƕƔƤ. Ls.l. 1 cf. Erot. ƨ 3 ƨƞƘƗơƟưƗƘƔ ...ƨƞȱƕƔƤ ƖȮƣ ơǯ ƾƣƩƔʎơƜ ƝƔȴ ƦȮƤ ƾƣƦƚƣȵƔƤ ǎƝȯƞơƧƟ; ƾƣƦƚƣƒƔƜ ab ƨƞƐƕƘƤ distinguuntur in sch. Eur. Hec. 567 (ƢƟƘƯμƔƦơƤ ƗƜƔƣƣơƏƤ): ƦȮƤ ƾƣƦƚƣȵƔƤ. ƦȮƤ ƨƞȱƕƔƤ. ƗƜƔƨȱƣƘƜ ƗȰ ƾƣƦƚƣȵƔ ƨƞƘƕȶƤ ƦƔȹƦɾ, Ʀʭ ƦȲƟ ƾƣƦƚƣȵƔƟ μȰƟ ǾƞȵƖơƟ ǒƩƘƜƟ ƔǵμƔ, ƢƟƘʝμƔ ƗȰ Ƣơƞȹ, ƦȲƟ ƗȰ ƨƞȱƕƔ Ʀȶ ǎƟƔƟƦȵơƟ Ʀȶ μȰƟ ƔǵμƔ Ƣơƞȸ, Ʀȶ ƗȰ ƢƟƘʝμƔ ǾƞȵƖơƟ ȟƤ ƢƣȶƤ ƥȹƖƝƣƜƥƜƟ Ʀơʝ ǎƟ Ʀʁ ƾƣƦƚƣȵɯ 1 lm. add. Lascaris

1055a (ʜơƨƘʎ ): ǎƝƢȵƟƘƜ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 cf. Hesych. ƣ 456 ʜơƨƘʎ· ƝƔƦƔƢȵƟƘƜ (Soph. Trach. 1055)… 1 lm. add. Lascaris

1055b (ƩƞƫƣƮƟ): ƟȱơƟ Ǡ ƟƘƝƣȷƟ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 ƟƐơƟ: vide ad sch. 847b fortasse recte 1 lm. add. Elmsley Ǡ ƟƘƝƣȷƟ om. Ƈ ƟƘƝƣƮƟ] ƟƘƔƣƮƟ Bernardakis 62 (cf. sch. 847b)

1057a ƾƨƣȯƥƦʪ : ƾƢƣơƥƗơƝȳƦʪ, ƾƟƘƟƟơȳƦʪ Ǡ ƾƞȱƝƦʪŭ Ǡ ƢƘƣȴ ǥƤ ơȎƝ ǒƩƘƜ ƦƜƤ ƨƣȯƥƔƥƛƔƜ ƦȵƤ ƘDzƚ ƦȲƟ ƨȹƥƜƟ. L T

229

sch. 1053 – sch. 1059

1 ƾƢƣơƥƗơƝƑƦʪ: cf. sch. Eur. Hipp. 820 ƝƚƞȴƤ ǂƨƣƔƥƦơƤ: ƝƔƝȶƟ ƾƢƣơƥƗȷƝƚƦơƟ; sch. Ap. Rh. 190, 22 ƾƨƣƏƥƦơƜơ: ƾƢƣơƥƗơƝƑƦơƧ ƾƟƘƟƟơƑƦʪ: cf. Hesych. Ɣ 8759 ǂƨƣƔƥƦơƟ· ƾƢƣơƟȷƚƦơƟ, ȣƥƦƘ μƚƗȱƟƔ ƟơʀƥƔƜ... ƾƞƐƝƦʪ: vide ad sch. 694.1 1 lm.] ƾƨƣƏƥƦʪ ƦʁƗƘ ƩƘƜƣƫƛƘƒƤ L Ǡ (pr.) om. Ƈ (de modo cf. sch. 552.2 ƥƩơƒƚƟ)] ǎƥƦƜ Ƈ

2 ƨƣƏƥƔƥƛƔƜ] ƨƣƏƥƔƜ Ƈ

ƘDzƚ

1057b (ƢȱƗɾ): ǎƢơƩʁ, ǣƦƦɾ. Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

1058a ƝơȎ ƦƔʝƦƔ ƞȷƖƩƚ ƢƘƗƜȯƤ : ǟ ǎƟ Ʀʭ ƢƘƗȵʪ ƕƔƞƞơμȱƟƚŭ Ǡ ǎƢƘȴ ǎƟ Ʀʭ żƘƥƥƔƞƜƝʭ ƢƘƗȵʪ ǎμƔƩȱƥƔƦơ ƢƣȶƤ žƘƟƦƔȹƣơƧƤ. L T 1 lm.] ƞȷƖƩƚ ƢƘƗƜȯƤ Ƈ; accuratiss. 1058 ƢƘƗƜƏƤ žƘƟƦƔƯƣơƧƤ] žƘƟ. ƦơʝƦơ ƞƐƖƘƜ Ƈ

2 żƘƥƥƔƞƜƝʭ] żƘƦƦƔƞƜƝʭ Ƈ

1058b ƞȷƖƩƚ ƢƘƗƜȯƤ : ǟ ǎƟ ƢƘƙơμƔƩȵɯ. ƛȱƞƘƜ ƖȮƣ ƘǮƢƘʎƟ ȃƦƜ ơȒƦƘ ƢƔƣƔƦƔƦƦȷμƘƟơƤ ơǵơƟ ƢƣȶƤ ſƔơμȱƗơƟƦƔ ơȒƦƘ ƢƣȶƤ ŵȎƖȱƔƟ Ǡ žƘƟƦƔȹƣơƧƤ. L T 1 lm.] Ǡ ƢƘƗƜȮƤ Ƈ, quippe qui hoc sch. scholio 1058a subiungat 2 ſƔơμƐƗơƟƦƔ] ƦȶƟ ſ. Ƈ ơȒƦƘ] Ǡ Zielinski 57, sed ơȒƦƘ tolerandum est ŵȎƖƐƔƟ] ƦȶƟ ŵȎƖƘƒƔƟ Ƈ žƘƟƦƔƯƣơƧƤ] ƦơȸƤ ž. Ƈ

1059 ƛȳƣƘƜơƤ ƕȵƔ : ƞȱơƟƦơƤ, ȓƗƣƔƤ, žƘƣƕȱƣơƧ ƝƔȴ ƦʬƟ ƞơƜƢʬƟ. L Ts.l. 1 (lm.) ƛȳƣƘƜơƤ (sicut apud poetam) T: ƛƑƣƜơƤ (sicut apud poetam) L add. ƦƔƯƣơƧ Ƈ

post ƞƐơƟƦơƤ

230

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

1060 (ǂƖƞƫƥƥơƤ): ƝƔƝȷƖƞƫƥƥơƤ, ƕȯƣƕƔƣơƤ Ǡ ƾƞƞȷƖƞƫƥƥơƤ. L Ts.l. 1 ƕƏƣƕƔƣơƤ: cf. Poll. IŽ 109 ƆơƨơƝƞʀƤ ƗȰ ǂƖƞƫƦƦơƟ ƦȶƟ ƕȯƣƕƔƣơƟ; Hesych. Ɣ 626 ǂƖƞƫƥƥơƜŭ ƕƏƣƕƔƣơƜ 1 lm. add. Brunck2; (ǂƖƞƫƥƥơƤ s.) L ƝƔƝƮƖƞƫƥƥơƤ et Ǡ om. Ƈ

1064 Ȥ ƢƔʎ : Ȥ țƞƞƘ, ƗƘʎƠơƟ ƦơʎƤ ǒƣƖơƜƤ ȃƦƜ ƾƞƚƛʬƤ ǎƠ ǧƣƔƝƞȱơƧƤ ǒƩƘƜƤ Ʀȶ ƖȱƟơƤ ƝƔȴ μȳ μơƧ ƢƣơƝƣȵƟɾƤ ƦȲƟ ŸƚƜȯƟƘƜƣƔƟ, ƾƞƞȮ ƦƔʎƤ ƥƔʎƤ ƩƘƣƥȴ ƦʀƤ ơǮƝȵƔƤ ƔȎƦȲƟ ǒƠƔƖƘ ƝƔȴ ƢƔƣȯƗơƤ μơƜ. ƦƔʝƦƔ ƗȰ ƾƖƟơʬƟ ȃƦƜ ƦȱƛƟƚƝƘƟ. L T 1 ǎƦƑƦƧμơƤ per ƾƞƚƛƑƤ explanatur in e.g. sch. Hom. Od. 1.174c1 ǎƦƑƦƧμơƟ: ƾƞƚƛƐƤ, ƾƞƚƛʬƤ; ibid. 1.174c2 ǎƦƑƦƧμơƟ] ƾƞƚƛʬƤ; sch. D Hom. Il. 1.558 ǎƦƑƦƧμơƟ: ƾƞƚƛƐƤ; Hesych. Ƙ 6596 ǎƦƑƦƧμơƟŭ ƾƞƚƛƐƤ (A558) Ǡ ƾƞƚƛʬƤ; ibid. Ƙ 6606 ǎƦƑƦƧμơƤŭ ƾƞƚƛƑƤ; ibid. Ƙ 6607 ǎƦƚƦƯμƫƤŭ ƾƞƚƛʬƤ; ibid. Ƙ 6623 ǎƦƑƦƧμƔŭ ƾƞƚƛʀ; Su. Ƙ 3311 ǎƦƑƦƧμơƤ: ǿ ƾƞƚƛƑƤ 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. 1064–7 Ȥ ƢƔʎ – ƦƘƝơʝƥƔƟ Ȥ țƞƞƘ – 3 μơƜ om. T 3 ǒƠƔƖƘ] ǎƠƏƖƔƖƘ Bernardakis 62, sed vide ad sch. 953.3–4 ƦƔʝƦƔ – fin.] haec ita reformavit T: ƾƖƟơʬƟ ǒƦƜ ȃƦƜ ƦƐƛƟƚƝƘƟ ƦƔʝƦƔ ƞƐƖƘƜ T

1067 ȟƤ ƘǮƗʬ ƥȯƨƔ : dzƟƔ μȯƛƫ ƢȷƦƘƣơƟ ȏƢȰƣ ǎμơʝ ƟơƥơʝƟƦơƤ ƞƧƢʁ ȃƦƔƟ DzƗɾƤ Ʀȶ ƥʬμƔ ƦʀƤ ŸƚƜƔƟƘȵƣƔƤ ƢƔƣŪ ǎμơʝ ƕƞƔƢƦȷμƘƟơƟ ƝƔȴ ƗƜƝƔȵƫƤ ƝƔƦƔƢơƟơȹμƘƟơƟ. L 1 lm. accuratiss. 1067–9 ȟƤ ƘǮƗʬ – ƝƔƝơƯμƘƟơƟ Ǡ add. Papageorgiou

1071 ȃƥƦƜƤ ȣƤ ƦƜƤ ƢƔƣƛȱƟơƤ : ȋμƚƣơƤ

ǞʚƦƘ Ɲơȹƣƚ ƟƚƢȵƚ, ǣ ƛŪ ǃμƔ μƚƦƣȴ ƝƞƔȵơƧƥŪ ƾƟƘƞȱƥƛƔƜ ƾƟȻƖƘƜ. L T 1 ȋμƚƣơƤ: Il. 16. 7–8 ƦȵƢƦƘ ƗƘƗȯƝƣƧƥƔƜ ƄƔƦƣȷƝƞƘƘƤ, ǞʚƦƘ Ɲơȹƣƚ | ƟƚƢȵƚ, ǣ ƛŪ ǃμƔ μƚƦƣȴ ƛȱơƧƥŪ ƾƟƘƞȱƥƛƔƜ ƾƟȻƖƘƜ

231

sch. 1060 – sch. 1079

1 lm. deest in Ƈ; accuratiss. 1071–2 ȃƥƦƜƤ – ƝƞƔƒƫƟ 3 ƟƚƢƒƚ] ƟƑƢƜơƤ T ǣ – fin. om. T

(lm.) ȣƤ ƦƜƤ, ut apud poetam L

1072 (ƕȱƕƣƧƩƔ): ƾƟƔƕơʬ. Ls.l. cf. sch. 805 ubi ƕƣƧƩưμƘƟơƟ per ƾƟơƜμưƙơƟƦƔ explicatur 1 lm. add. Elmsley

1074 (ƔǮȰƟ ƘǯƢȷμƚƟ ƝƔƝơʎƤ): ȏƢȱƨƘƣơƟ ƢɱƟ ƝƔƝȷƟ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley; auctorem scholii ƘǯƢƮμƚƟ pro ǏƥƢƮμƚƟ legisse coni. Wolff 62 (cf. sch. Ai. 318)

1075 ƟʝƟ ƗŪ ǎƝ ƦơƜơȹƦơƧ : ǎƠ ǮƥƩƧƣơʝ ƖȱƖơƟƔ ƾƥƛƘƟȳƤŭ Ǡ ȏƢȶ ƦơƜơȹƦơƧ ƝƔƝơʝ. L T 1 ƛʀƞƧƤ per ƾƥƛƘƟƑƤ explanatur etiam in sch. Eur. Med. 928 ƖƧƟȲ ƗȰ ƛʀƞƧ: ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝŭ ƾƥƛƘƟȰƤ Ʀȶ ƖƧƟƔƜƝƘʎơƟ ƖƐƟơƤ ƢƐƨƧƝƘ …; Hesych. ƛ 488 ƛʀƞƧŭ ƾƥƛƘƟƐƤ (Eur. Med. 928) 1 lm. deest in T; 1075 ƟʝƟ – ƘȓƣƚμƔƜ ǮƥƩƧƣơʝ] ǮƥƩ., ƨƚƥƒ, T

1077 (ƥƝȱƪƔƜ): ƥƝȷƢƘƜ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

1079 (ƛƘɱƥƛƘ ƢƏƟƦƘƤ): ǿ ƞȷƖơƤ ƢƣȶƤ ƦơȸƤ ƢƘƣƜƘƥƦʬƦƔƤ. L T 1 lm. addidi

232

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

1081 (ƔǮƔʎ ): ǾƗƧƟȻμƘƟơƤ ƾƟƔƕơɲ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris

1082 ǒƛƔƞƪƐ μŪ ǂƦƚƤ : ƢȯƞƜƟ ǎƠƘƢȹƣƫƥȱƟ μƘ ǿ ƦʀƤ ƟȷƥơƧ ƥƢƔƥμȷƤ. L; cf. gll. in Ts.l. 1 ƟƮƥơƧ: vide ad sch. 1104 1 lm. ex L, nisi quod ǒƛƔƞƪƘƟ pro ǒƛƔƞƪƐ μŪ praebet; commentatorem ǒƛƔƞƪƐ μŪ pro ǒƛƔƞƪƘƟ legisse collegit Wunder 164; accuratiss. 1082 ǒƛƔƞƪƐ μŪ – ƔȔ ƢȯƞƜƟ – μƘ] ǎƠƘƢƯƣƫƥƘƟ gl. ad ǒƛƔƞƪƘƟ nec plura T ǿ – fin.] ƦʀƤ ƟƮƥơƧ gl. ad ǂƦƚƤ nec plura T

1083–4 ơȎƗŪ ƾƖȹμƟƔƥƦȷƟ μŪ ǎɱƟ | ǒơƜƝƘƟ : ǾƗȹƟƚƤ ƾƢƘȵƣƔƥƦơƟ, ǂƟƘƦơƟ ǾƗƧƟʬƟŭ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ơȎƝ ǎƟƗȵƗƫƥȵ μơƜ. L T 1 ǾƗƯƟƚƤ – 2 ǾƗƧƟʬƟ] haec separavit et ad lm. ƾƖƯμƟƔƥƦơƟ rettulit Bernardakis 62; reliquam enarrationem (2 ƾƟƦȴ – fin) ad lm. ơȎƗƐ μƘ ǎɱƟ ǒơƜƝƘƟ adscripsit 1 lm.] ƾƖƯμƟƔƥƦơƟ T ǾƗƯƟƚƤ] ơȎƝ ǾƗ. T ƾƢƘƒƣƔƥƦơƟ] ǂƢƘƜƣơƟ T ǂƟƘƦơƟ] ơȎƝ ǂƟ. T

1086 (Ȥ ŸƜȶƤ ƾƝƦȵƤ, ƢƔʎƥơƟ): Ȥ ƝƘƣƔƧƟȱ, ƘDzƛƘ μƘ ƕȯƞơƜƤ. L T 1 ƕƏƞơƜƤ: cf. sch. Ar. Vesp. 222a ƕƔƞƞƑƥơμƘƟ: … ơǵơƟ ƢƔƜƑƥơμƘƟ; sch. Hom. Il. 6.9a ǒƕƔƞƘ: ȃƦƜ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǒƢƔƜƥƘ; ibid. 8.313c ƕƏƞƘ ƥƦʀƛơƤ: ƢƣȶƤ Ʀȶ ƕƏƞƘ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǒƢƔƜƥƘƟ; ibid. 8.299a ƕƔƞƐƘƜƟ: ȃƦƜ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƢƔʎƥƔƜ Ʀȶ ƕƔƞƘʎƟ; ibid. 20.462a2 Ʀȶ ƗȰ ƥƩƘƗȶƟ : ƥƩƐƗƚƟ ƢƔƒƥƔƤ, ƾƟƦƐƛƚƝƘ ƗȰ Ʀȶ ƕƔƞưƟ 1 sch. 1086 post sch. 1087 praebet T 1 lm. add. Elmsley 234 prob. Nauck 434 et Kruytbosch 50): ƞƏƕơƜƤ L

ƕƏƞơƜƤ T (recepit Blaydes

1087 (ǎƖƝƔƦȯƥƝƚƪơƟ ƕȱƞơƤ … ƝƘƣƔƧƟơʝ ): ƦȷƠƘƧƥơƟ ƝƔƦŪ ǎμơʝ ƦȶƟ ƝƘƣƔƧƟȷƟ. Ls.l. T 1–2 de T vide ad sch. 1086.1

1 lm. addidi

sch. 1081 – sch. 1093a

233

1088 (ƗƔȵƟƧƦƔƜ): ǎƥƛȵƘƜ μƘ ǟ ƟȷƥơƤ. Ls.l. 1 ǎƥƛƒƘƜ: cf. sch. 771 ubi ǎƗƔƒƟƧƦơ per ƝƔƦƑƥƛƜƘƟ explanatur; sch. D Hom. Il. 7.320 ƗƔƒƟƧƟƦơ: ǢƥƛƜơƟ 1 lm. add. Lascaris

1089 ǢƟƛƚƝƘƟ, ǎƠȻƣμƚƝƘƟ : ǢƝμƔƥƘƟ, ƾƟƘƝȯƩƞƔƥƘƟ ƝƔȴ ǎƠƘƖȳƖƘƣƦƔƜ. L Ts.l. 1 ǢƝμƔƥƘƟ: cf. sch. 999 ubi μƔƟƒƔƤ ǂƟƛơƤ per ƦȲƟ ƾƝμȲƟ ƦʀƤ μƔƟƒƔƤ explanatur 1 lm. deest in T ƝƔȴ om. T

1089–90 Ȥ ƩƐƣƘƤ – ƕƣƔƩƒơƟƘƤ : ƾƨơƣʬƟ ƘǮƤ ǑƟ ǓƝƔƥƦơƟ μȱƞơƤ ƗƧƥƨơƣƘʎ ȃƦƜ ƾƨŪ ơdzơƧ ơǵơƟ ƖȱƟơƟƘƟ ƔȎƦơʝ Ʀȶ ƥʬμƔ. L T 1 lm. scripsi: Ȥ ƟʬƦƔ ƝƔȴ ƥƦƐƣƟƔ L: deest in T ǑƟ Stephanus 369: ǓƟƔ L: om. T μƐƞơƤ] ƦʬƟ μƘƞʬƟ ƔȎƦơʝ T post ƗƧƥƨơƣƘʎ ita pergit T: ƾƣƜƛμƘʎ ƗȰ ƦơȸƤ ǂƛƞơƧƤ ơȑƤ ŹȎƣƧƥƛƘʎ ƦƘƦƐƞƘƝƘƟ 2 ȃƦƜ – fin. om. T

1091 ȏμƘʎƤ ǎƝƘʎƟơƜ : DŽƣƔ ȏμƘʎƤ ǎƥƦƘ Ɣǯ ƦȶƟ ƁƘμƘƔʎơƟ ƩƘƜƣƫƥȯμƘƟƔƜ ƞȱơƟƦƔ, ƦȶƟ ƦȲƟ ƁƘμȱƔƟ ƞƧμƔƜƟȷμƘƟơƟ; L 1 lm. accuratiss. 1091–4 ȏμƘʎƤ – ƝƔƦƘƜƣƖƏƥƔƥƛƘ L

2 ƁƘμƐƔƟ Lp (Lascaris): ƟƘμƔƒƔƟ

1093a [ƞȱơƟƦŪ,] ǂƢƞƔƦơƟ : ƾƢƣȷƥƜƦơƟ. L Ts.l. cf. sch. Pi. P. 1.40 ƾƢƞȯƦơƧ: Ǡ ƾƢƣơƥƢƘƞȯƥƦơƧ …; Hesych. Ɣ 6225 ǂƢƞƚƦơƟŭ ƾƢƣƮƥƜƦơƟ 1 lm. L decurtavi: deest in T

234

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

1093b1 (ƝƾƢƣơƥȳƖơƣơƟ): ƾƟƔƖȷƣƘƧƦơƟ, ƾƗƜȳƖƚƦơƟ Ǡ ƨƔʝƞơƟ ƝƔȴ μƘμƜƥƚμȱƟơƟ, ȁ ơȎƝ ǂƟ ƦƜƤ ƢƣơƥƨƛȱƖƠƔƜƦơ. L T 2 ȁ – fin.: cf. Phryn. PS fr. 255 ƾƢƣơƥȳƖơƣơƤ ǂƟƛƣƫƢơƤ: ȁƟ ơȎƩ ơǵȷƟ ƦƘ ƢƣơƥƔƖơƣƘʝƥƔƜ ƗƜȮ ƦƣȷƢơƧ ƦƣƔƩȹƦƚƦƔ = Ɔb Ɣ 2051 = Phot. Ɣ 2741 = Su. Ɣ 3697 1–2 hoc sch. cum sch. 1093a copulat L codd.

1 lm. add. Brunck2

2 ȁ Stephanus 370: ȁƟ

1093b2 (ƝƾƢƣơƥȳƖơƣơƟ): ƾƗƜȳƖƚƦơƟ. Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

1095–6 (ƗƜƨƧʀ ƦŪ … ǯƢƢơƕƏμơƟƔ ƥƦƣƔƦƮƟ | ƛƚƣʬƟ): ƦȶƟ ƦʬƟ žƘƟƦƔȹƣƫƟ. L 1 lm. addidi; (ǂμƜƝƦơƟ s.) L

1095 ǂμƜƝƦơƟ : ƾƢƣơƥƢȱƞƔƥƦơƟ, ɣ ơȎƝ ǤƟ ƥƧμμʎƠƔƜ ƝƔȴ ƥƧμƕƔƞƘʎƟ. L T 1 haec separatim collocat Ƈ: cum sch. pr. coniungit L lm. ex Ƈ: deest in L (vide 1)

1096 ȏƢƘȵƣơƩơƟ ƕȵƔƟ : ȏƢƘƣȱƩơƟƦƔ ƝƔƦȮ ƦȲƟ ƗȹƟƔμƜƟ. ȏƕƣƜƥƦȲƟ ƗȰ μȯƩƜμơƟ, ȞμȷƟ, ơȎ ƥȻƨƣơƟƔŭ ƗƜȮ ƦȶƟ ƁȱƥƥơƟ ƝƔȴ ƦȶƟ ƄƘƜƣȵƛơƧ ƖȯμơƟ. LT 1 ȏƢƘƣƐƩơƟƦƔ: cf. sch. D Hom. Il. 208 ȏƢƘƒƣơƩơƟ: ȏƢƘƣƐƩơƟƦƔ; sch. Pi. N 3 42a … ȏƢƘƣƮƩơƧƤ, ơǵơƟ ȏƢƘƣƐƩơƟƦƔƤ …; sch. Ap. Rh. 158, 16 ȏƢƘƒƣơƩơƤ: ȏƢƘƣƐƩƫƟ …; Hesych. Ƨ 291 ȏƢƘƒƣơƩơƤŭ ȏƢƐƣơƩơƤ, ȏƢƘƣƐƩƫƟ (Z 208) 1 lm. deest in Ƈ, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 1095 coniungat omissis verbis ȏƢƘƣȱƩơƟƦƔ – ƗȹƟƔμƜƟ 2 ƗƜȮ – fin.] ƗƜȮ ƦȶƟ ƟƐơƟ Ʀơʝ ƄƘƜƣƒƛơƧ ƖƏμơƟ Ƈ

sch. 1093b1 – sch. 1100

235

1098a ƦƣȵƝƣƔƟơƟ : ǧƥȵơƗơƤ ƢƘƟƦƚƝơƟƦơƝȱƨƔƞơƟ ƔȎƦȷƟ ƨƚƥƜƟ ƘǴƟƔƜ, ơȕƦơƤ ƗȰ ƦƣȵƝƣƔƟơƟ. L; cf. sch. reformatum in T 1 ǧƥƒơƗơƤ: Th. 312 ƢƘƟƦƚƝơƟƦƔƝȱƨƔƞơƟ, ƾƟƔƜƗȱƔ ƦƘ ƝƣƔƦƘƣȷƟ ƦƘ 1–2 sch. ita retractavit Ƈ: ƇƣƒƝƣƔƟơƟ ƞƐƖƘƜ ƦȶƟ ƝƯƟƔ ȁƟ ǧƥƒơƗơƤ ƢƘƟƦƚƝơƟƦơƝƐƨƔƞơƟ ǒƨƚƥƘƟ 1 ƢƘƟƦƚƝơƟƦơƝƐƨƔƞơƟ] ƢƘƟƦƚƝơƟƦƔ- Lascaris, at cf. Pi. fr. 93.2 S.-M.

1098b (ƥƝȹƞƔƝŪ): ƦȶƟ žȱƣƕƘƣơƟ. Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

1099–1100 ƦȷƟ ƦƘ ƩƣƧƥȱƫƟ | ƗƣȯƝơƟƦƔ : ƨƔƥȴ ƦȶƟ NJƦƞƔƟƦƔ Ʀʭ ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ ƝƘƝơμƜƝȱƟƔƜ ƦȮ μʀƞƔ ȃƦƘ ƝƔȴ ƔȎƦȶƤ ƗƜƔƗƘƠȯμƘƟơƤ ƦȶƟ ơȎƣƔƟȶƟ ǎƕȯƥƦƔƥƘƟ. L T 1 lm. deest in Ƈ; accuratiss. 1099–1100 ƦƮƟ ƦƘ ƩƣƧƥƐƫƟ – ƦƮƢơƜƤ 2 ƔȎƦȶƤ] ƔȎƦȶƟ (aut ƦȶƟ NJƦƞƔƟƦƔ significat aut cum ƦȶƟ ơȎƣƔƟȶƟ coniungendum) Elmsley, sed h.l. ƔȎƦȶƤ Herculem respicit et cum ƗƜƔƗƘƠƏμƘƟơƤ subaudiri ƔȎƦȶƟ (i.e. ƦȶƟ NJƦƞƔƟƦƔ) potest

1100 (ǎƢŪ ǎƥƩȯƦơƜƤ ƦȷƢơƜƤ): ƦơʎƤ ƦʀƤ ſƜƕȹƚƤ. L aliter Apollodorus II 113 ƦƔʝƦƔ ƗȰ (scil. ƦȮ ƩƣƧƥɱ μʀƞƔ) ǤƟ, ơȎƩ ȣƤ ƦƜƟƘƤ ƘǴƢơƟ ǎƟ ſƜƕȹɾ, ƾƞƞŪ ǎƢȴ Ʀơʝ NJƦƞƔƟƦơƤ ǎƟ ȗƢƘƣƕơƣȱơƜƤ 1 lm. add. Lascaris

236

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

1101 (ǎƖƘƧƥȯμƚƟ): ǎƢƘƜƣȯƛƚƟ. Ls.l. 1 cf. sch. Ant. 1005 ubi ǎƖƘƧƮμƚƟ per ƾƢƘƢƘƜƣưμƚƟ explicat commentator et sch. Eur. Hipp. 663 ubi ƖƘƖƘƧμƐƟơƤ per ƢƘƜƢƘƜƣƔμƐƟơƤ et ƢƘʎƣƔƟ ƞƔƕưƟ explicatur; Hesych. Ɩ 463 ƖƘƯƥƘƜŭ ƾƢơƢƘƜƣƏƥƘƜ; ibid. Ɩ 462 ƖƘƯƥƔƥƛƔƜŭ ƢƘƜƣɱƥƔƜ 1 lm. add. Lascaris

1103 ǂƟƔƣƛƣơƤ : ơȎƝ ǒƩƫƟ ƦȮ ǂƣƛƣƔ ƦʬƟ μƘƞʬƟ ƗƜȮ Ʀȶ ƥƘƥʀƨƛƔƜ ƔȎƦȯ. ƝƔƦƘƣƣƔƝƫμȱƟơƤ ƗȰ ƦȮƤ ƥȯƣƝƔƤ ƥƔƢƘȴƤ ƝƔȴ ǒƩƫƟ ƔȎƦȮƤ ƝƣƘμƔμȱƟƔƤ ȟƤ ʜȯƝƚ. L T 1 cf. sch. Eur. Or. 228 (ad lm. ǂƟƔƣƛƣơƤ) ƾƗȹƟƔƦơƤ, μȲ ƗƧƟȯμƘƟơƤ ƝƘƩƣʀƥƛƔƜ ƦơʎƤ ǂƣƛƣơƜƤ 2 post ƦȮƤ ƥȯƣƝƔƤ add. ƦơƧƦƐƥƦƜ Ƈ ƝƣƘμƔμƐƟƔƤ] ǎƝƝƣƘμƔμƐƟƔƤ Ƈ

1104 ƦƧƨƞʀƤ ȏƢŪ ǂƦƚƤ : ȏƢȶ ƟȷƥơƧ ƾƨƔƟơʝƤ ƝƔȴ ƾƝƔƦƔƞȳƢƦơƧ, ǡƟ ơȎƝ ǒƥƦƜƟ ǮƗƘʎƟ. L T 1 ƟƮƥơƧ: cf. sch. 1082 ubi ǂƦƚƤ per ƟƮƥơƧ explanatur; Ph. 705 ǂƦƔ: ǟ ƟƮƥơƤ; sch. Eur. Hipp. 276 ȏƢŪ ǂƦƚƤ per ȏƢȶ ƦʀƤ ƟƮƥơƧ explicatur ƾƨƔƟơʝƤ: cf. sch. Aesch. Pr. 250b ƦƧƨƞƏƤ] … ƾƨƔƟƘʎƤ 1 lm.] ƦƧƨƞʀƤ ƗȰ Ƈ, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 1103 iungat ȏƢȶ] ǢƖơƧƟ ȏƢȶ Ƈ ƟƮƥơƧ post ƾƝƔƦƔƞȳƢƦơƧ transp. Ƈ ǡƟ – fin.] fortasse a prioribus seiungenda ut sui iuris scholium

1107 (DzƥƦƘ): Ȥ ƢƔƣȷƟƦƘƤ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. addidi Ȥ] ơǯ Ƈ

sch. 1101 – sch. 1119

237

1109 ƝƾƝ ƦʬƟƗƘ : ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƝƔȴ ơȓƦƫƤ ǒƩƫƟ, ƝƔȴ ơȓƦƫ ƗƜƔƝƘȵμƘƟơƤ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. scripsit Bernardakis 62 (hoc lm. subaudit Blaydes 240): ƝǀƟ Ʀȶ μƚƗȰƟ Ȥ | ƝǀƟ μƚƗȰƟ ǓƣƢƫ (vv. 1107–8) L: deest in Ƈ; ‘scholion quod est ad verba versus 1107, ƝǀƟ Ʀȶ μƚƗȰƟ Ȥ | ƝǀƟ μƚƗȰƟ ǓƣƢƫ prius aliud habebat lemma, nempe ƾƞƞŪ ƘȔ ƖƐ ƦơƜŪ Wansink 111 ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƝƔȴ om. T

1113 (ƾƟƗƣȶƤ ƦơʝƗƐ ƖŪ ƘǮ ƥƨƔƞȳƥƘƦƔƜ): ƘǮ ƾƢơƦƘȹƠƘƦƔƜ ƦơȹƦơƧ. L 1 ƾƢơƦƘƯƠƘƦƔƜ: cf. sch. Eur. Ph. 725 (ad lm. ƥƨƔƞƘƒƤ) ƾƢơƦƧƩưƟ; ibid. 758 (ad lm. ƥƨƔƞʬ) … ƾƢơƦƯƩƫ; id. Med. 197 ubi ƥƨƏƞƞơƧƥƜ per ƾƢơƦƧƖƩƏƟƘƜƟ ƢơƜơʝƥƜ explicatur; Hesych. ƥ 2844 ƥƨƔƞƘʎƘƟŭ ƾƢơƦƯƩơƜƘƟ; ibid. ƥ 2894 ƥƨƑƞƘƜƘƟŭ ƾƢơƦƧƩƘʎƟ ƢơƜƑƥƘƜƘƟ; Ɔ ƥ 401 ƥƨƔƞƘƒƤŭ ƾƢơƦƧƩưƟ = Phot. 559, 22 = Su. ƥ 1715 1 lm. addidi ƾƢơƦƘȹƠƘƦƔƜ Lascaris: ƾƢơƦƘȹƠƚƦƔƜ L

1115 (ƥƜƖȲƟ ƢƔƣƔƥƩưƟ): ƾƟƦȴ ƥƜƫƢȳƥƔƤ ƝƔȴ ǟƥƧƩȯƥƔƤ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris

ƾƟƦȴ om. Ƈ

1118 ơȎ ƖȮƣ ǀƟ ƖƟơȵƚƤ : ƦơƧƦȱƥƦƜƟ ǎȮƟ μȲ Ʀơʝ ƛƧμơʝ ƢƔȹƥɾ ƢƣȷƦƘƣơƟ, ơȎ ƗƧƟȳƥɾ ƖƟʬƟƔƜ ȏƢȶ ƦʀƤ ǾƣƖʀƤ ƥƝơƦơȹμƘƟơƤ ȃƦƜ ƾƗȵƝƫƤ ƔȎƦȲƟ ƾƟƘƞƘʎƟ ƕơȹƞƘƜ, ȃƢƘƣ ƥơȵ ǎƥƦƜ μƘƖȵƥƦƚ ƩƔƣƏ, ơȎƗȰ ȃƦƜ μȯƦƚƟ ƾƞƖƘʎƤ ƦȲƟ ƪƧƩȲƟ ƟƘμƘƥʬƟ Ʀʁ ơȎƗȰƟ ƾƗƜƝƚƥƏƥɾ. L T 1 lm. deest in Ƈ; accuratiss. 1118–9 ơȎ ƖƏƣ – μƏƦƚƟ ƦơƧƦƐƥƦƜƟ om. Ƈ ƛƧμơʝ] ƛƧμ., ƨƚƥƒ, Ƈ 2–3 ƔȎƦȲƟ ƾƟƘƞƘʎƟ inverso ordine Ƈ 3 μƘƖƒƥƦƚ] μƘƖƏƞƚ Ƈ μȯƦƚƟ ƾƞƖƘʎƤ inverso ordine Ƈ 4 Ʀʁ ... ƾƗƜƝƚƥƏƥɾ scripsi: ƦȲƟ ... ƾƗƜƝƑƥƔƥƔƟ codd. quo servato μƜƥʬƟ pro ƟƘμƘƥʬƟ coni. Zielinski 57

1119 (ƩƔȵƣƘƜƟ): ƾƟƘƞƘʎƟ ƔȎƦȲƟ ƕơƧƞȷμƘƟơƤ. L 1 lm. addidi

238

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

1121 (ƢơƜƝȵƞƞƘƜƤ): ƥơƨȵƙɾ, ƝƔƞƞƫƢȵƙƘƜƤ Ʀʭ ƞȷƖʪ. L Ts.l. 1 ƥơƨƒƙɾ: cf. sch. Ph. 130 ubi ƢơƜƝƒƞƫƤ ƔȎƗƫμƐƟơƧ per ƥơƨƜƙơμƐƟơƧ illustravit scholiasta ƝƔƞƞƫƢƒƙƘƜƤ: cf. Hesych. Ƣ 2714 ƢơƜƝƒƞƔŭ ƢƘƢơƜƝƜƞμƐƟƔ, ƝƔƞƞƫƢƜƥμƐƟƔ 1 lm. add. Elmsley ƥơƨƒƙɾ Ƈ (quod haesitans commendat Blaydes 242): ƥơƨȵƙƘƜƤ L Ʀʭ ƞȷƖʪ] ƦȶƟ ƞƮƖơƟ Ƈ

1124 Ȥ ƢƔƖƝȯƝƜƥƦƘ : ƔȓƦƚ Ʀơʝ μȵƥơƧƤ ǎƢȵƦƔƥƜƤ, ȃƦƜ ƝƔȴ μƟȳμƚƟ ƦʀƤ μƚƦƣȶƤ ǎƢơƜȳƥƔƦơ ƝƔȴ ơȎ ƦơʝƦơ μȷƟơƟ ƾƞƞȮ ƝƔȴ ǧƣƔƝƞȱơƧƤ ƾƝơȹơƟƦơƤ. L 1 lm. accuratiss. 1124–5 Ȥ ƢƔƖƝƏƝƜƥƦƘ – ǎμƐ;

1126 ǒƩƘƜ ƖȮƣ ơȓƦƫƤ: Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ ƝƔƦŪ ƔȎƦȳƟ, ƨƚƥȵ, ƢƣɱƖμƔ ǎƝƦȷƤ ǎƥƦƜƟ ƾƗƜƝȵƔƤ, ȟƤ μȲ ƗȱơƟ ƘǴƟƔƜ ƦơʝƦơ ƥƜƫƢʁ ƢƔƣƔƗơʝƟƔƜ. L T 1 lm. deest in Ƈ; accuratiss. 1126 ǒƩƘƜ – ƢƣƐƢƘƜƟ Papageorgiou: μƚƗȰƟ L: μȲ ƗȰ Ƈ

ƖȮƣ om. Ƈ

2 μȲ ƗƐơƟ

1129 ƞȱƖŪ, ƘȎƞƔƕơʝ Ɨȱ : ƘȎƞƔƕơʝ μȲ ƗƜŪ ȥƟ ȏƢȰƣ ƦʀƤ μƚƦƣȶƤ ƞȱƖƘƜƤ ƢƘƣȴ ǎμȰ ƨƔʝƞơƤ ǎƠƘƞƘƖƩƛʁƤ. L T 1 lm. deest in Ƈ; accuratiss. 1129 ƞƐƖŪ – ƖƘƖưƤ

1131 ƢƣȶƤ Ʀơʝ; ƦȱƣƔƤ ƦơƜ ƗƜȮ ƝƔƝʬƟ : ƢƣȶƤ ƦȵƟơƤ; ǂƢƜƥƦơƟ ƖȮƣ ƗƜȮ ƗƧƥƨȳμƫƟ ȣƥƢƘƣ ǎμƔƟƦƘȹƥƫŭ ƦơƧƦȱƥƦƜƟ ǂƢƜƥƦơƟ ƞȱƖƘƜƤ ȃƦƜ ǏƔƧƦȲƟ ƾƟƘʎƞƘƟ, ƘǮ μȲ ǂƣƔ μƔƟƦƜƝʀƤ μƘƦȱƩƫƟ ƦơʝƦơ ǒƖƟƫƤ ȟƤ μȯƟƦƘƧμƔ ǂƢƜƥƦơƟ. ƦơʝƦơ ƗȰ ƘǴƢƘƟ, ǎƢƘƜƗȲ ƢơƞƞȯƝƜƤ ƦȮ μȲ ƢƣơƥƗơƝȻμƘƟƔ μƔƟƦƘȹơƟƦƔƜ 5 ơǯ ƛƘơȵ. L T

239

sch. 1121 – sch. 1136

1 lm.] ƦƐƣƔƤ Ƈ; accuratiss. 1131 ƢƣȶƤ Ʀơʝ; – ǎƛƐƥƢƜƥƔƤ ƢƣȶƤ ƦƒƟơƤ; om. Ƈ ǂƢƜƥƦơƟ Ƈ (Lascaris): ƾƢƜƥƦʬƟ L ƖȮƣ] ƖƏƣ, ƨƚƥƒ, T 2 ƗƧƥƨƑμƫƟ Hermann 188: ƗƧƥƨƚμʬƟ L: ƗƧƥƨƚμƜʬƟ T ȣƥƢƘƣ om. T 4 μƔƟƦƘƯơƟƦƔƜ] μƔƟƦƘƯơƧƥƜƟ T

1132 (ƢƣȶƤ ǎƝƦȷƢơƧ): ȏƢȶ ǂƞƞơƧ, ƠȱƟơƧ. L 1 ƠƐƟơƧ: cf. Hesych. Ƙ 1740 ǒƝƦơƢƔŭ ƠƐƟƔ; ibid. Ƙ 1742 ǒƝƦơƢơƟŭ … ƠƐƟơƟ; Ɔ Ƙ 250 ǒƝƦơƢƔŭ ƠƐƟƔ = Phot. Ƙ 516 = Su. Ƙ 663 1 lm. add. Elmsley

post ǂƞƞơƧ interpunxi

1134 (ƥƦƣƔƨƘȵƚ ƛƧμƮƤ): ƞȳƠƘƜƘƟ ǟ ǾƣƖȳ. L 1 ǾƣƖƑ: cf. sch. Ph. 324, 3 ƛƧμʭ: ǾƣƖʁ; sch. Aesch. Th. 692i ƛƧμȶƤ] ǾƣƖƑ; sch. Hom. Il. 15.24b2 ‘ƛƧμƮƤŪ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǾƣƖƑ; ibid. 15.24b3; sch. D Hom. Il. 2.196 ƛƧμƮƤ: … ǟ ǾƣƖƑ 1 lm. add. Lascaris; (ƥƦƣƔƨƘƒƚ s.) L

1135 ƗƘƜƟơʝ ƞȷƖơƧ : ƛƔƧμƔƥƦơʝŭ ǂƢƜƥƦơƟ ƖƏƣ, ƘǮ ƢƔȹƥơμƔƜ ƦʀƤ ǾƣƖʀƤŭ ȃμƫƤ ƘǮƢȱ. L T 1 ƛƔƧμƔƥƦơʝ: cf. sch. Eur. Hec. 592 ƗƘƜƟƮƟ: … ƛƔƧμƔƥƦȶƟ; id. Phoen. 355 ƗƘƜƟȶƟ per ƛƔƧμƔƥƦȶƟ explicatur; sch. D. Hom. Il. 18.394 ƗƘƜƟƑ: … ǟ ƛƔƧμƔƥƦƑ 1 lm. accuratiss. 1135 ƗƘƜƟơʝ – ƟơƘʎƤ

1136 ǃƢƔƟ Ʀȶ ƩƣʀμŪ ǣμƔƣƦƘ : ƙƚƦơʝƥƔ, ƨƚƥȵ, ƗƜƔƢƣȯƠƔƥƛƔƜ Ʀơʝ ȃƞơƧ ƢƣȯƖμƔƦơƤ ǣμƔƣƦƘƟ. L T

ƩƣƚƥƦȷƟ

ƦƜ

1 μƫμƐƟƚ per ƙƚƦơʝƥƔ explanatur etiam in sch. Aesch. Ch. 45 μƫμȱƟƔ] ƙƚƦơʝƥƔ; sch. Hes. Op. 5.2 ƾƢȶ Ʀơʝ μʬƥƛƔƜ Ʀȶ ƙƚƦƘʎƟ; Hesych. μ 2074 μʬƦƔƜŭ ƙƚƦƘʎ …; ibid. μ 2049 μưμƘƛƔŭ ƙƚƦơʝμƘƟ; ibid. μ 2073 μʬƥơŭ ƙƑƦƘƜ; ibid. Ƙ 2578 ǎμưƥƔƦơŭ … ǎƙƑƦƚƥƘƟ; Phot. 284, 3–4 … Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ μʬƥƛƔƜ, ƙƚƦƘʎƟ; Su. μ 1346 ƀʬƥƛƔƜŭ … ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƙƚƦƘʎƟ …

240

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. 1136 ǃƢƔƟ – μƫμƐƟƚ (interpretem μƫμƐƟƚ pro μƟƫμƐƟƚ legisse e ƙƚƦơʝƥƔ (1) collegit Wolff 63) 2 ƢƣƏƖμƔƦơƤ] ƩƣƑμƔƦơƤ T

1143 Ǯơȸ Ǯơȹ : ƾƟƔμƜμƟƚƥƝȷμƘƟơƤ ƦʀƤ ƾƢȶ ŸƫƗȻƟƚƤ μƔƟƦƘȵƔƤ ƦƔʝƦƔ ƞȱƖƘƜ ƾƣƜƛμȳƥƔƤ ƦȶƟ ƩƣȷƟơƟ. L T 1 lm. deest in T; 1143–50 ǮơƯ – ǎƖư

1145 (ƨƣơƟʬ – ǓƥƦƔμƘƟ): ǂƣƦƜ ǒƖƟƫƟ ȃƦƜ ƘǮƤ ǒƥƩƔƦơƟ ǤƞƛơƟ ƥƧμƨơƣɱƤ. LT 1 haec a sch. pr. separavi

lm. addidi ǂƣƦƜ] ƾƣƦƒƫƤ ƖƏƣ, ƨƚƥƒƟ, T

1147 (ƥƢȱƣμƔ ƥʬƟ ǿμƔƜμȷƟƫƟ): ƾƟƦȴ ƦơȸƤ ƥơȸƤ ƾƗƘƞƨơȹƤ. L Ts.l. 1 ƾƗƘƞƨơƯƤ: cf. sch. Aesch. Th. 351k ǿμƔƒμơƟƘƤ] ƾƗƘƞƨơƒ; ŵel. D. ơ 15 …ǿμƔƒμƫƟŭ ƾƗƘƞƨƮƤ… = Ɔ ơ 127 = Phot. 330, 20 = Su. ơ 236; Su. ơ 235 1 lm. add. Elmsley

1148–9 (ŸƜȶƤ | μȯƦƚƟ ǂƝơƜƦƜƟ): ƦȲƟ džƞƝμȳƟƚƟŭ ƦơʝƦơ Ɨȱ ƨƚƥƜƟ ȟƤ ƾƟȯƠƜƔ ƢȯƥƩƫƟ. L T 1 lm. addidi ƦȲƟ džƞƝμȳƟƚƟ om. T ƗȰ om. T

2 ƾƟƏƠƜƔ] ƾƟ. Ʀơʝ ŸƜȶƤ T

1149–50 (ƦƘƞƘƧƦƔȵƔƟ ǎμơʝ | ƨȳμƚƟ): ƦȲƟ ƢƘƣȴ ƦʀƤ ƦƘƞƘƧƦʀƤ μơƧ ƨȳμƚƟ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Papageorgiou ƨƑμƚƟ om. Ƈ

sch. 1136 – sch. 1159

241

1151 (ǎƢƔƝƦȵɯ): ƢƔƣƔƛƔƞƔƦƦȵɯ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 ƢƔƣƔƛƔƞƔƦƒɯ: cf. sch. Ai. 413c ǎƢƏƝƦƜơƟ: ƢƔƣƔƛƔƞƏƥƥƜơƟ 1 lm. add. Brunck2, nisi quod ǎƢƔƝƦƒƔ pro ǎƢƔƝƦƒɯ scripsit ƢƔƣƔƛƔƞƔƥƥƒɯ Ƈ

ƢƔƣƔƛƔƞƔƦƦƒɯ]

1152 (ǓƗƣƔƟ): ƗƜƔƦƣƜƕȳƟ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 ƗƜƔƦƣƜƕƑƟ: cf. sch. Th. V 7, 2 Ʀʁ ǓƗƣɯ: Ʀʁ ƗƜƔƦƣƜƕʁ … 1 lm. add. Elmsley

1157–8 (ǎƠƑƝƘƜƤ – ƝƔƞʁ ): ƘǮƤ ǟƞƜƝȵƔƟ ǣƝƘƜƤ dzƟƔ ƨƔƟʁƤ ǂƠƜƔ ƢƣȯƦƦƫƟ ƢƔʎƤ ǎμȶƤ ƘǴƟƔƜ. Ls.l. T 1 lm. addidi ƨƔƟƘʎƤ Blaydes 248 prob. Nauck 434 et Bernardakis 63, sed scholiasta dzƟƔ adverbium quasi coniunctionem intellexit

1159 ǎμơȴ ƖȮƣ ǤƟ ƢƣȷƥƨƔƟƦơƟ : ƢƣơƥμƘμƔƟƦƘƧμȱƟơƟ, ƢƣơƥƘƜƣƚμȱƟơƟ ȏƢȶ Ʀơʝ ŸƜȷƤŭ ơȓƦƫ ƗȰ ƗƜȮ Ʀơʝ ƥ ǎƟ Ʀʁ ƇƣƔƖƜƝʁ ƞȱƠƘƜ. L Ts.l. 2 ƇƣƔƖƜƝʁ ƞƐƠƘƜ: Did. fr. 90 1 lm. deest in T ƢƣơƥμƘμƔƟƦƘƧμƐƟơƟ ƢƣơƥƘƜƣƚμƐƟơƟ (ƢƣơμƘμƔƟƦƘƧμƐƟơƟ in linea et ƥ supra ơ scriptum ut fiat ƢƣơƥμƘμƔƟƦƘƧμƐƟơƟ) L: ƢƣơƝƘƩƣƚƥμƐƟơƟ ƢƣơμƘμƔƟƦƘƧμƐƟơƟ T (ƢƣƮƨƔƟƦơƟ apud poetam praebet T) 2 ơȓƦƫ – fin.] om. T: ad ƆƘƞƞʬƟ relata in initio scholii 1167a posuit Brunck1 prob. Dindorf 73 et Wansink 111–2 et post sch. 1167a.1 ƾƢơƗƘƩƮμƘƟơƜ inseruit Heath 81 scholium ƢƣƮƥƨƔƟƦơƟ: ƢƣơƥμƘμƔƟƦƘƧμƐƟơƟ, (sic; debuit ) ƢƣơƘƜƣƚμƐƟơƟ (Ƣƣơsic, quasi ex L) ȏƢȶ Ʀơʝ ŸƜƮƤŭ ơȓƦƫ ƗƒƩƔ Ʀơʝ ƥ ǎƟ Ʀʁ ƇƣƔƖƜƝʁ ƞƐƠƘƜ rescripsit Schmidt 90 coll. Hesych. Ƣ 4062 ƢƣȷƨƔƟƦơƟŭ ƞȷƖƜơƟ, ƛƘơƢƣȷƢƜơƟ, ƢƣơƗƘƗƚƞƫμȱƟơƟ quem ad locum Sophocleum refert; Hesychium Herodotum V 63, 2 respicere censet Hansen

242

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

1160 ƢƣȶƤ ƦʬƟ ƢƟƘȷƟƦƫƟ : ƦʬƟ ƙȻƟƦƫƟŭ ƢƟƘʝμƔ ƖȮƣ ǟ ƪƧƩƑŭ

ƪƧƩȲƟ ǎƝȯƢƧƥƘƟ. ƝƔȴ

ȃƥƥƔ ƦƘ ƖƔʎƔƟ ǒƢƜ ƢƟƘȵƘƜ ƦƘ ƝƔȴ ǓƣƢƘƜ. L T 1 ƪƧƩƑ: cf. sch. Aesch. Th. 981h ƢƟƘʝμŪ] ƦȲƟ ƪƧƩƑƟ; sch. Eur. Hec. 1.10 Ʀȶ ƗȰ ƢƟƘʝμƔ ƗƚƞƔƗȲ ǟ ƪƧƩƑ; sch. Hom. Il. 5.696a1 … ƪƧƩƑ: ƪƧƩȲ Ʀȶ ǎƝƢƟƘƮμƘƟơƟ ƢƟƘʝμƔ; ibid. 696a2 ƪƧƩƑ: ƪƧƩȲ Ʀȶ ƢƟƘʝμƔ; ibid. 13.84 ƝƔȴ ƖȮƣ ǟ ƪƧƩȲ ƢƟƘʝμƏ ǎƥƦƜƟ; ibid. 13.654a … ƗʀƞơƟ ȃƦƜ ƢƟƘʝμƔ ǟ ƪƧƩƑ; Hesych. ƪ 293 ƪƧƩƑŭ ƢƟƘʝμƔ (E 296..); ibid. ƪ 289 ƪƧƩƏƤŭ ƢƟƘƯμƔƦƔ (A 3..); Su. Ƣ 1820 ƢƟƘʝμƔ: ǟ ƪƧƩȲ Ʀơʝ ƾƟƛƣưƢơƧ 2 Hom. Il. 22. 467 ƾƢȶ ƗȰ ƪƧƩȲƟ ǎƝȯƢƧƥƥƘ 4 Hom. Il. 17. 446–7 ơȎ μȰƟ ƖƏƣ Ʀƒ ƢơƯ ǎƥƦƜƟ ǾƬƙƧƣưƦƘƣơƟ ƾƟƗƣȶƤ | ƢƏƟƦƫƟ, ȃƥƥȯ ƦƘ ƖƔʎƔƟ ǒƢƜ ƢƟƘȵƘƜ ƦƘ ƝƔȴ ǓƣƢƘƜ. 1 lm.] ƦʬƟ ƢƟƘƮƟƦƫƟ T ƪƧƩȲ] ƪƧƩƑ, ƾƢȶ ƗȰ ƪƧƩʀƤ Ʀȶ ƢƟƐƘƜƟ T ǎƝȯƢƧƥƥƘƟ om. T 3 ƝƔȴ] ƝƔȴ ȋμƚƣơƤ T 4 ȃƥƥƔ ƦƘ T: ȃƥƔ L Homerus: ǎƢƜƢƟƘƒƘƜ codd. post ǓƣƢƘƜ add. ǒƟƛƘƟ ƖȮƣ ǟ ƪƧƩƑ L

2 ƪƧƩȲƟ ǒƢƜ ƢƟƘƒƘƜ

1163 ơȓƦƫ ƙʬƟƦƔ μŪ ǒƝƦƘƜƟƘƟ ƛƔƟȻƟ : ƗƧƟȯμƘƜ ƖȮƣ ƔȎƦȶƤ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƾƟƘʎƞƘƟ. L 1 lm. accuratiss. 1163 ǒƝƦƘƜƟƘƟ

1164 ƨƔƟʬ ƗŪ ǎƖȻ : ǎƣʬ ƥơƜ ǂƞƞƚƟ μƔƟƦƘȵƔƟ ƟƘƫƦȱƣƔƟ ƥƧμƨƫƟơʝƥƔƟ Ʀʁ ƢƣơƦȱƣɯ. L 1 ƥƧμƨƫƟơʝƥƔƟ: cf. sch. Ar. Nub. 67b ƠƧƟƐƕƚμƘƟ] ƥƧƟƘƨƫƟƑƥƔμƘƟ; Hesych. ƥ 2268 ƥƧμƕƔȵƟơƟƦƔŭ ƥƧμƨƫƟơʝƟƦƔ; ibid. ƥ 2275; ibid. ƥ 2438; ibid. ơ 1881; Ɔ ƥ 286 ƥƧμƕƔȵƟơƟƦƔŭ ƥƧμƨƫƟơʝƟƦƔ = Phot. 548, 16 = Su. ƥ 1362; Su. ƥ 1361; ibid. ƥ 1363; ibid. ƥ 1358; ibid. ƥ 1365; ibid. ƥ 1471 de vocabulo ƠƧƟƑƖơƣƔ per ƥƧμƨƫƟƘʎƟ explicato cf. sch. 814 1 lm. accuratiss. 1164–5 ƨƔƟʬ – ƝƔƜƟƏ; interpretem ƥƧμƕƔƒƟơƟƦƏ ƥơƜ pro ƥƧμƕƔƒƟơƟƦŪ DzƥƔ legisse coni. Wunder3 157

sch. 1160 – sch. 1167a

243

1167a ƆƘƞƞʬƟ : ǒƟƜơƜ ƩƫƣȴƤ Ʀơʝ ƥ ƖƣȯƨơƧƥƜƟ ǗƞƞơȸƤ ƾƢơƗƘƩȷμƘƟơƜ ƝƔȴ ǗƞƞơƢȵƔƟ ƦȲƟ ŸƫƗȻƟƚƟ ƟơμȵƙơƧƥƜƟ ƘǴƟƔƜŭ ƦȲƟ ƖȮƣ ƩȻƣƔƟ ơȓƦƫƤ ǧƥȵơƗơƤ ǾƟơμȯƙƘƜ ǎƟ ǦơȵƔƜƤ ƞȱƖƫƟ ơȓƦƫƤŭ 5

10

ǒƥƦȵ ƦƜƤ ǖƞƞơƢȵƚ ƢơƞƧƞȳƜơƤ ǞƗŪ ƘȎƞƘȵμƫƟ ƾƨƟƘƜȲ μȳƞơƜƥƜ ƝƔȴ ƘǮƞƜƢȷƗƘƥƥƜ ƕȷƘƥƥƜƟŭ ǒƟ ƗŪ ǂƟƗƣƘƤ ƟƔȵơƧƥƜ ƢơƞȹƣƣƚƟƘƤ, ƢơƞƧƕơʝƦƔƜ, Ƣơƞƞơȵ, ƾƢƘƜƣȱƥƜơƜ, ƨʝƞƔ ƛƟƚƦʬƟ ƾƟƛƣȻƢƫƟŭ ǒƟƛƔ ƗȰ ŸƫƗȻƟƚ ƦƜƤ ǎƢŪ ǎƥƩƔƦƜʁ ƢƘƢȷƞƜƥƦƔƜ, ƦȲƟ ƗȰ źƘȸƤ ǎƨȵƞƚƥƘ ƝƔȴ ȁƟ ƩƣƚƥƦȳƣƜơƟ ƘǴƟƔƜ ƦȵμƜơƟ ƾƟƛƣȻƢơƜƤŭ ƟƔʎơƟ ƗŪ ǎƟ ƢƧƛμȱƟƜ ƨƚƖơʝ ǒƟƛƘƟ ǎƢƜƩƛȷƟƜơƜ μƔƟƦȳƜƔ ƢȯƟƦƔ ƨȱƣơƟƦƔƜ ȁƤ ƗȲ ƝƘʎƛƜ μơƞȺƟ ƛƘȶƟ ǂμƕƣơƦơƟ ǎƠƘƣƘƘȵƟɾ ƗʬƣƔ ƨȱƣƫƟ ǒƞƛɾƥƜ ƥȸƟ ơǮƫƟơʎƤ ƾƖƔƛơʎƥƜƟŭ

ǎƟƦƘʝƛƘƟ ƗȰ ƞȱƖơƧƥƜƟ ƘǴƟƔƜ ǗƞƞơƢƜƘʎƤ ƝƔȴ ƦơȸƤ ǎƟ ŹȎƕơȵɯ ơǮƝȳƥƔƟƦƔƤ. 15 L T 1 ǒƟƜơƜ – ƾƢơƗƘƩƮμƘƟơƜ: cf. sch. Hom. Il. 16.234b ƆƘƞƞơȵ: ƢƣȶƤ Ʀȶ ƦʀƤ ƖƣƔƨʀƤ ƾμƨȵƕơƞơƟ. ơǯ μȰƟ ƖȮƣ ƆƘƞƞơȹƤ, ơǯ ƗȰ ǗƞƞơȸƤ ǎƠƘƗȱƠƔƟƦơ…; ibid. 16.234c. {ƾμƨȴ ƗȰ} ƆƘƞƞơȵ: ǿ μȰƟ ƄȵƟƗƔƣơƤ (fr. 59,3) ǗƞƞơȸƤ ƔȎƦơȸƤ ơDzƘƦƔƜ. ƗƘʎ ƗȰ ƾƢȶ Ʀơʝ Ƥ ǂƣƩƘƥƛƔƜ ƦȲƟ ƞȱƠƜƟ, ƾƢȶ ƆƘƞƞȳƘƟƦơƤ ƢơƦƔμơʝ…; ibid. 16.234d1 ƆƘƞƞơȵ: «Ǘƞƞơȵ», ƾƢȶ Ǘƞƞơʝ Ʀơʝ żƘƥƥƔƞơʝ. ơȓƦƫ ƗȰ ǿ ƢơƜƚƦȲƤ ƝƔȴ ơǯ ƢƔƞƔƜơȵ. ƦƜƟȰƤ ƗȰ ƆƘƞƞơȵ, ƾƢȶ ƆƘƞƞȳƘƟƦơƤ Ʀơʝ ƢơƦƔμơʝ…; Strab. VII 7, 10 ƢƮƦƘƣơƟ ƗȰ ƩƣȲ ƞƐƖƘƜƟ ǗƞƞơƯƤ, ȟƤ ƄƒƟƗƔƣơƤ (fr. 59, 3 Sn.-M.), Ǡ ƆƘƞƞơƯƤ, ȟƤ ȏƢơƟơơʝƥƜ ƢƔƣŪ ȇμƑƣʪ (Ƅ 234) ƝƘʎƥƛƔƜ, ǟ ƖƣƔƨȲ ƾμƨƒƕơƞơƤ ơȔƥƔ ơȎƝ ǎɲ ƗƜƜƥƩƧƣƒƙƘƥƛƔƜ; Steph. Byz. 268, 18-20; EM 709, 30-7; Eust. Il. III 844, 15-8 2 ǗƞƞơƢƒƔƟ – 8 ƢƘƢƮƞƜƥƦƔƜ: cf. Philochorus (FGrHist 328 F 225) ap. Strab. VII 7, 10 3 ǎƟ ǦơƒƔƜƤ: Żes. fr. 240 M.-W. 14 ǎƟƦƘʝƛƘƟ – fin. cf. Steph. Byz. 268, 17–8 1 lm. scripsi: ƆƘƞƞʬƟ ƢƣơƥƘƞƛưƟ (ƢƣơƥƘƞƛưƟ apud poetam) T: deest in L, quippe qui hoc sch. cum. sch. 1167b coniungat (ǒƟƜơƜ ƗȰ) verba scholii 1159.2 ơȓƦƫ – fin. ƗȰ deleto huic explicationi praeposuit Brunck1 (ad lm. ƆƘƞƞʬƟ) ǒƟƜơƜ – ƾƢơƗƘƩƮμƘƟơƜ] ǒƟƜơƜ ǖƞƞʬƟ (ǖƞ- spiritu leni) ƩƫƣȴƤ Ʀơʝ ƥ ƖƣƏƨơƧƥƜ T ǗƞƞơȸƤ spiritu aspero L post ƾƢơƗƘƩƮμƘƟơƜ verba scholii 1159.2 ơȓƦƫ – fin. inseruit Heath 81 2 ǗƞƞơƢƒƔƟ scripsi: ŹƞƞơƢƒƔƟ, sine spiritu, L: ǖƞƞơƢƒƔƟ T 3 ǎƟ ǦơȵƔƜƤ om. T 4 ǖƞƞơƢƒƚ spiritu leni codd. 8 ǒƟƛƔ ƗȰ Meineke Straboni VII 7, 10 (ǎƟƛƏƗƘ) restituit: ǒƟƛƔ ƦƘ T: ǒƟƛƔ L 9 ǎƨƒƞƚƥƘ T Lp (Lascaris): ƨƒƞƚƥƘ L 13 ƦŪ add. Papageorgiou ǒƞƛɾƥƜ Lp (Lascaris): ǒƞƛɾ L: dzƝơƜƦơ T 14 ƞƐƖơƧƥƜƟ] ƞƐƖƘƜ T ǗƞƞơƢƜƘʎƤ scripsi: ǖƞƞơƢƜƘʎƤ spiritu leni T: ŹƞƞơƢƒƘʎƤ, sine spiritu, duobus accentibus L

244

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

1167b ƘǮƥƘƖƣƔƪƏμƚƟ : ƾƝơȹƥƔƤ ǒƖƣƔƪƔŭ ǒƛơƤ ƖȮƣ ƦơȸƤ ƩƣƚƥμȶƟ ƗƘƩơμȱƟơƧƤ ƢƔƣƔƩƣʀμƔ ƖƣȯƨƘƜƟ, dzƟƔ μȲ ǎƢƜƞȯƛƫƟƦƔƜ. L T 1–2 hanc annotationem separatim praebet T; in initio sch. 1167a legitur in L 1 lm.] ƆƘƞƞʬƟ ƘǮƥƘƞƛȺƟ L ƾƝơƯƥƔƤ] ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƾƝ. T 1–2 ƦơȸƤ … ƗƘƩơμƐƟơƧƤ] ƦơʎƤ … ƗƘƩơμƐƟơƜƤ T

1168 ƝƔȴ ƢơƞƧƖƞȻƥƥơƧ ƗƣƧȷƤ : ǢƦơƜ ƢơƞƞȮ μƔƟƦƘƧơμȱƟƚƤ ƝƔȴ ƗƜȮ ƦơʝƦơ ƢơƞƞȮ ƨƛƘƖƖơμȱƟƚƤ Ǡ ƦʀƤ ƗƜƔƨȷƣơƜƤ ƗƜƔƞȱƝƦơƜƤ ƩƣƚƥμʪƗơȹƥƚƤ ƢƣȶƤ ƦȲƟ ǏƝȯƥƦơƧ ƦʬƟ μƔƟƦƘƧơμȱƟƫƟ ƖƞʬƥƥƔƟ. L T cf. Eust. Il. III 843, 9–11 … ƝƔȴ Ʀȶ Ʀơʝ ŸƜȶƤ ƗȰ ǯƘƣȶƟ ǎƝƘʎƥƘ ƘǴƟƔƜ Ʀȶ ƝƔƦȮ ƦȲƟ μƔƟƦƜƝȲƟ ƨƚƖȷƟ, ǡƟ ƆơƨơƝƞʀƤ ƢơƞȹƖƞƫƥƥơƟ ǎƟ ƇƣƔƩƜƟȵƔƜƤ ƨƚƥȵƟ, ȟƤ ƢơƞȹƨƫƟơƟ, ơǵƔ ƝƔȴ ƢơƞƞơʎƤ μƔƟƦƘƧơμȱƟƚƟ; Eust. Il. I 524, 22–3 … ǡƟ ƗƣʝƟ ƢơƞȹƖƞƫƥƥơƟ ƞȱƖƘƜ ǿ ƆơƨơƝƞʀƤ, ǢƖơƧƟ ƢơƞȹƨƫƟơƟ 1 lm.] ƢơƞƧƖƞȻƥƥơƧ ƗȰ ƗƣƧƮƤ T, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 1167b coniungat

1169 ƩƣȷƟʪ Ʀʭ ƙʬƟƦƜ : Ʀʭ ȏƨƘƥƦʬƦƜŭ ǿ ƖȮƣ ƢƔƣƘƞƛȺƟ ơǯơƟƘȴ ƗƜȱƨƛƔƣƦƔƜ, ǿ ƗȰ μȱƞƞƫƟ ƢȯƞƜƟ ǂƗƚƞơƤ. L T 1 lm.] Ʀʭ ƙʬƟƦƜ T Ʀʭ (alt.)] ǢƦơƜ Ʀʭ T 1–2 ƗƜƐƨƛƔƣƦƔƜ] Ɨ. ƝƔȴ ƦƐƛƟƚƝƘƟ T

ȏƨƘƥƦʬƦƜ] ǎƨƘƥƦʬƦƜ ƝƔȴ ƢƔƣƮƟƦƜ ƟʝƟ T

1174 ƦƔʝƦŪ ơȔƟ ǎƢƘƜƗȲ ƞƔμƢƣȯ : ƨƔƟƘƣȯ, ƥƔƨʀ, ƢƣȷƗƚƞƔ. L 1 ƨƔƟƘƣƏ: cf. sch. Thuc. II 7, 1 ƞƔμƢƣʬƤ: ƨƔƟƘƣʬƤ, ƾƟƔμƨƜƥƕƚƦȳƦƫƤ. ơȎƝ ǎƢȴ Ʀơʝ μƘƖȯƞƫƤ ǎƟƦƔʝƛƔ ƝƘʎƦƔƜ ǟ ƞȱƠƜƤ, ƾƞƞȮ μƘƦƔƞƚƢƦƜƝʬƤ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƨƔƟƘƣʬƤ; Ael. D. ƞ 2 ƞƔμƢƣʬƤ Ʀȶ ƨƔƟƘƣʬƤ, ơȎ Ʀȶ ǎƟƗȷƠƫƤ· ƝƔȴ ƢƔƣȮ żơƧƝƧƗȵƗƚƜ «ƝƔȴ ƞƘƞƧμȱƟƫƟ ƞƔμƢƣʬƤ ƦʬƟ ƥƢơƟƗʬƟ»· ƝƔȴ ƢƔƣȮ ƦơʎƤ ǂƞƞơƜƤ ƦơʎƤ ƢƔƞƔƜơʎƤ = Phot. ƞ 78 = Su. ƞ 100

1174–5 (ƦƔʝƦŪ ơȔƟ – ƥƯμμƔƩơƟ): ǎƢƘȴ ơȔƟ, ƨƚƥȵƟ, ǿ ƩƣƚƥμȶƤ ƾƢȱƕƚ, ƗƘʎ ƥƘ ƖƘƟȱƥƛƔƜ ƥȹμμƔƩơƟ ǎμơȵ. L T

245

sch. 1167b – sch. 1179a

1–2 haec separatim leguntur in T: cum sch. pr. coniunguntur in L om. T ƗƘʎ] ƩƣȲ T

1 lm. addidi

ơȔƟ

1176a1 ƝƔȴ μȲ ŪƢƜμƘʎƟƔƜ : ƝƔȴ μȲ ƾƢƘƜƛȳƥƔƤ μơƜ ƢƔƣơƠȹƟɾƤ ƘǮƤ ƞơƜƗơƣȵƔƤ ƝƔƦȮ ƥơʝ. L T 1 lm. deest in T, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 1174–5 conectat; accuratiss. 1176 ƝƔȴ μƑ – ƥƦƮμƔ 1–2 sch. ita reformavit T ƝƔȴ μȲ ƾƢƘƜƛƑƥɾƤ ȣƥƦƘ ƢƔƣơƠʝƟƔƒ μƘ ƞơƜƗơƣƒƔƤ ƝƔƦȮ ƥơʝ ǎƢƔƖƔƖƘʎƟ 1 ƢƔƣơƠƯƟɾƤ O. Hense: ƢƔƣơƠƧƟƘʎƤ L

1176a2 (μȲ ŪƢƜμƘʎƟƔƜ): ƾƢƘƜƛơʝƟƦȯ μơƜ. Ls.l. 1 lm. addidi

1177 ƾƞƞŪ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƘǮƝȯƛơƟƦƔ : ƾƢȶ ƝơƜƟơʝ Ʀȶ ƗƘʎŭ Ɨȱ ƥƘ ƘDzƝơƟƦƔ Ʀʁ ǎμʁ ƢƣơƥƦȯƠƘƜ ƢƣȯƦƦƘƜƟ ȁ ƕơȹƞơμƔƜŭ Ʀȶ ƖȮƣ ƦơʎƤ ƖơƟƘʝƥƜ ƢƘȵƛƘƥƛƔƜ ƟȷμơƤ ǎƥƦȴ ƝȯƞƞƜƥƦơƤ ƝƔȴ ƘȎƝƞƘȲƤ ƢƔƣȮ ƢɱƥƜƟ. L T 1 lm. accuratiss. 1177–8 ƾƞƞŪ ƔȎƦƮƟ – ƢƔƦƣƒ ƗƘʎ add. Brunck1 ƗƘʎ (pr.) sublato ante ƘDzƝơƟƦƔ deletum Ǡ habet L

ƗȰ om. T, inciso post

1179a ƦƔƣƕʬ μȰƟ ƘǮƤ ƞȷƖơƧ : ƘȎƞƔƕơʝμƔƜ μȰƟ ƘǮƤ ƦơƜƔȹƦƚƟ ǿμƜƞȵƔƟ ǎƞƛȺƟ μȲ ơȎƩ ƔǯƣƘƦȯ μơƜ ƢƣơƦƘȵƟɾƤŭ ƢƣȯƠƫ ƗȰ ȃμƫƤ ƝǀƟ ƗƘƜƟȮ ɒ. L T 1 ƘȎƞƔƕơʝμƔƜ: cf. sch. D Hom. Il. 4.388 ƦƏƣƕƘƜ: … ƚȎƞƔƕƘʎƦơ; Hesych. Ʀ 184 ƦƏƣƕƚƥƔƟŭ ƚȎƞƔƕƑƛƚƥƔƟ (O 280); ibid. Ʀ 172 ƦƔƣƕƑƥƔƟƦƘ[Ƥ]ŭ … ƘȎƞƔƕƚƛƐƟƦƘƤ 1 lm.] ƦƔƣƕʬ T; accuratiss. 1179–80 ƦƔƣƕʬ – ƗơƝƘʎ ƨƚƥƜƟŭ ƘȎƞ. T μȰƟ om. T 2 ǎƞƛȺƟ] ǎƞƛƘʎƟ T

ƘȎƞƔƕơʝμƔƜ] ƢƘƣƜƨƣƔƥƦƜƝʬƤ

246

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

1179b (ƘǮƤ ƞȷƖơƧ ƥƦȯƥƜƟ): ƢƘƣƜƨƣƔƥƦƜƝʬƤ ƘǮƤ ƞȷƖơƧƤ. Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Brunck2

1182 (ƢƒƥƦƜƟ – ǎƢƜƥƦƣƐƨƘƜƤ;): ƙƚƦƘʎƤ, ǎƢȯƖƘƜƤ μơƜ ƾƝƣƜƕʀ ƢȵƥƦƜƟ; L 1 lm. addidi; (ǎƢƜƥƦƣƐƨƘƜƤ s.) L

1183 (ƾƢƜƥƦȳƥƘƜƤ ǎμơȵ ): ƖƣȯƨƘƦƔƜ ƢƣơƥƥƦȳƥƘƜ ƖŪ ǎμơȵ, ǎƟƔƟƦƜƫƛȳƥɾŭ ƾƢȶ μƘƦƔƨơƣɱƤ ƦʬƟ ǎƟ Ʀʁ ƕƣȻƥƘƜ ƪƫμʬƟ ƢƣơƥƜƥƦƔμȱƟƫƟ. L 1 lm. addidi Ɩƣ. L ƢƣơƥƥƦƑƥƘƜ ƖŪ scripsi praeeuntibus Hermann 193 (ƢƣơƥƦƑƥƘƜ ƖŪ) et Papageorgiou xvii (ƢƣơƥƥƦƑƥɾƤ): ƢƣơƥƦȳƥɾƤ L: ƢƣơƥƦƑƥƘƜƤ Lascaris ǎƟƔƟƦƜƫƛƑƥɾ] in ǎƟƔƟƦƜưƥɾ mutatum a reliqua enarratione separavit et ut glossam ad ƾƢƜƥƦƑƥƘƜƤ rettulit Wolff 234, non intelligens ǎƟƔƟƦƜƫƛƑƥɾ h.l. medio sensu, non passive, usurpari

1186 (Ǥ μȲƟ Ʀȵ ƗƣȯƥƘƜƟ;): ǎƢȴ Ʀʭ Ʀȵ ƗƣɱƥƔƜ; Ls.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley Ʀʭ scripsi: Ʀȶ L

1188 (ǎƢȻμơƦơƟ): ȃƣƝƜơƟ. Ls.l. 1 Su. Ƙ 2839 ǖƢȻμơƦơƟŭ ƆơƨơƝƞʀƤ· ȂμƟƧμŪ ǒƖƫƖƘ źʀƟŪ ǒƩƫƟ ǎƢȻμơƦơƟ. ƦơƧƦȱƥƦƜ Ʀơʝ ȃƣƝơƧ ǎƖƖƧƚƦȳƟ. 1 lm. add. Lascaris

1189 (ƘǮ ƗŪ ǎƝƦȶƤ ǒƞƛơƜƤ): ƘǮ ƢƔƣƔƕƔȵƚƤ ƦơȸƤ ȃƣƝơƧƤ. L 1 lm. add. Lascaris

247

sch. 1179b – sch. 1194

1190a ơȎ μȲ ƞƏƕƫ : ơȎ ƩƣƘȵƔ ƕƞƔƕʀƟƔȵ μƘŭ ƢơƜȳƥƫ ƖȮƣ ǁ ƢƣơƥƦȯƠƘƜƤ μơƜ. L 1 lm. add. Lascaris; accuratiss. ơȎ μȲ ƞƏƕƫŭƗƣƏƥƫ ƖƏƣ; (ơȎ μƑ s.) L

1190b (ƘȒƩơμƔƜ ƗŪ ȃμƫƤ): [Ǡ] ƢơƜƑƥƫ ƗƐ, ƘǮ ƕơƯƞƘƜ ƥƯ. L 1 haec a sch. pr. deleto Ǡ seiunxi; lm. addidi ƢơƜƑƥƫ, i.e. ƘȒƠơμƔƜ

1191 (ƦȶƟ ƃDzƦƚƤ źƚƟȶƤ) ȓƪƜƥƦơƟ ƢȯƖơƟ : ȏƪƚƞȶƟ ȂƣơƤ ǎƟ ŹȎƕơȵɯ ǟ ƃDzƦƚŭ ƢɱƟ ƗȰ ȂƣơƤ ȂƣơƤ Ʀơʝ ŸƜȶƤ ǾƟơμȯƙƘƦƔƜ. L; cf. sch. retractatum in T 1 ȂƣơƤ: cf. ad sch. 634 1 lm. L supplevit Brunck2: deest in T; (ȓƪƜƥƦơƟ s.) L

1–2 de T vide ad sch. 1192.1–2

1192 (ȟƤ – ǂƟƫ): ǎƢƘƒ, ƨƔƥƒƟ, ȏƪƒƥƦʪ ȂƟƦƜ Ʀʭ ƛƘʭ ǎƟ ȓƪƘƜ ƦȮƤ ƛƧƥƒƔƤ ƢơƜƘʎƥƛƔƜ. L; cf. sch. retractatum in T 1–2 haec cum sch. pr. coniuncta in L et T (ȂƣơƤ ŹȎƕơƒƔƤ ȏƪƚƞȶƟ ǟ ƃDzƦƚŭ ƢɱƟ ƗȰ ȂƣơƤ Ʀơʝ ŸƜȶƤ ǾƟơμƏƙƘƦƔƜŭ ȏƪƒƥƦʪ ƖȮƣ ȂƟƦƜ, ƨƔƥƒ, Ʀʭ ƛƘʭ ƝƔȴ ǎƟ ȓƪƘƜ ƗƘʎ ƦȮƤ ƛƧƥƒƔƤ ƢơƜƘʎƥƛƔƜ ƦȮƤ ƢƣȶƤ ƔȎƦƮƟ) separatim posui 1 lm. addidi ƨƔƥƒƟ Stephanus 373 suo Marte (nam Turnebus 135 hoc vocabulum non praebet): ƨƚƥƜƟ L (de Hyllo accepit Wolff 14 prob. Dindorf 73) ƗƘʎ add. Stephanus 373 ex Turnebo 135

1194 ƔȎƦƮƩƘƜƣƔ : ƦƔʎƤ ƥƔƧƦơʝ ƩƘƣƥȴ μƘƛŪ ȥƟ ƛȱƞƘƜƤ ƨȵƞƫƟ. ơȎ ƖȮƣ μȷƟơƤ ǎƗȹƟƔƦơ ƨȱƣƘƜƟ ƔȎƦȷƟ. L T 1 ƦƔʎƤ ƥƔƧƦơʝ ƩƘƣƥƒ: cf. sch. Ai. 57a ƔȎƦƮƩƘƜƣ: ǎƟ ƦƔʎƤ ǮƗƒƔƜƤ ƩƘƣƥƒƟ; sch. Aesch. Supp. 592 ubi ƔȎƦƮƩƘƜƣ per Ʀʁ ǏƔƧƦơʝ ƩƘƜƣƒ explicatur; Ɔb Ɣ 2481 ƔȎƦƮƩƘƜƣƔŭ … ǎƢȴ Ʀơʝ ƢƣƏƠƔƟƦơƤ ǿƦƜơʝƟ Ʀʁ ǏƔƧƦơʝ ƩƘƜƣƒ = Phot. Ɣ 3263 1 lm. ex Ƈ: ǎƠƔƣƐƟƦƔ (sic) ƥƘ (v. 1193) L; accuratiss. 1194 ƔȎƦƮƩƘƜƣƔ – ƨƒƞƫƟ ǢƖơƧƟ ƦƔʎƤ Ƈ μƘƛŪ] ƝƔȴ μƘƛŪ Ƈ 2 ǎƗƯƟƔƦơ] ǞƗƯƟƔƦơ Ƈ

ƦƔʎƤ]

248

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

1196–7 (ǂƣƥƘƟŪ … ǂƖƣƜơƟ ǒƞƔƜơƟ): ǂƝƔƣƢơƟ ƾƖƣƜȱƞƔƜơƟ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 cf. Ael. D. Ɣ 25 (Phryn. PS fr. 63) ǂƖƣƜơƤ ǒƞƔƜơƤ: ǡƟ ơǯ Ƣơƞƞơȴ ƾƖƣƜȱƞƔƜơƟ ƝƔƞơʝƥƜƟ. ǒƥƦƜ ƢƔƣȮ ƄƜƟƗȯƣʪ ǎƟ ȓμƟơƜƤ (fr. 46 S.) = Ɔb Ɣ 300 = Phot. Ɣ 261; Su. Ƙ 766 ǒƞƔƜơƟ ǂƖƣƜơƟ: ƦȶƟ ƾƖƣƜƐƞƔƜơƟ 1 lm. addidi ǂƝƔƣƢơƟ om. Ƈ

1201–2 (ƘǮ ƗȰ μƑ – ƕƔƣƯƤ): ƘǮ ƗȰ μȲ ƦƔʝƦƔ ƢơƜȳƥƘƜƤ, ƗƜƔƦƘƞȱƥƫ ƦƔʎƤ ƝƔƦȯƣƔƜƤ ƝƔȴ ƝƔƛŪ NjƜƗơƧ ƕƔƣʬƟ ƥƘ. L; cf. gl. in Ts.l. 1 lm. addidi; (ƘǮƗƘμƑ s.) L plura T

ƘǮ ƗȰ – fin.] ƘǮ μȲ ƦƔʝƦƔ ƢơƜȳƥƘƜƤ gl. ad ƘǮ ƗȰ μƑ nec

1202 (ƾƣƔʎơƤ): ǎƢȯƣƔƦơƤ, ƦƜμƫƣȶƤ ƗƔȵμƫƟ. L Ts.l. 1 ǎƢƏƣƔƦơƤ: passive explicatur apud Hesych. Ɣ 6947 ƾƣƔʎơƟŭ ƝƔƦȯƣƔƦơƟ…; Su. Ɣ 3816 džƣƔʎơƤ: ƾƣɲ ȏƢơƝƘȵμƘƟơƤ. μȲ ƟʝƟ ǾƟƔȵμƚƟ, ƾƞƞŪ ƾƣƔʎơƤ, ƘDz ƥȱ ƦƜ ƗȱƗƣƔƝŪ, ǾƞơȵμƚƟ. ƝƔȴ ƆơƨơƝƞʀƤ· ƘǮ ƗȰ μȲ, μƘƟʬ ƥŪ ǎƖȺ ƝƔȴ ƟȱƣƛƘƟ ƾƣƔʎơƤ ƘǮƥƔƘȴ ƕƔƣȹƤ. ǿ ǧƣƔƝƞʀƤ ƨƚƥƜ ƦƘƞƘƧƦʬƟ ƢƣȶƤ ƦȶƟ ƧǯȶƟ ƔȎƦơʝ…; sch. Soph. Ant. 867 ƾƣƔʎơƤ] ǎƢƜƝƔƦƏƣƔƦơƤ...; ƦƜμƫƣƮƤ: de ƾƣƔʎơƤ sensu activo usurpato cf. sch. Eur. Med 608 (ƥơʎƤ ƾƣƔƒƔ ... ƗƮμơƜƤ): ǎƢƜƝƔƦƚƣƔμȱƟƚ ƦơʎƤ ƥơʎƤ ơDzƝơƜƤ; id. Hipp. 1415 (ad lm. ƘDzƛ' ǤƟ ƾƣƔʎơƟ ƗƔƒμơƥƜƟ ƕƣơƦʬƟ ƖƐƟơƤ): ƘDzƛƘ ǤƟ ƝƔƦƔƣɱƥƛƔƜ ǂƟƛƣƫƢơƟ ƛƘʬƟ…; Hesych. Ɣ 6947 ƾƣƔʎơƟŭ … ȇ ƢƣȷƥƛƘƟ ǎƞƛȺƟ ǤƟ ƾƣƔʎȷƤ μơƜ ƟȱƝƧƤ. ơǵơƟ ƾƣȮƟ ƢƣơƥƘƦƣȵƕƘƦơ ƝƔȴ ƝƔƦƘƧƩȳƟ. ƆơƨơƝƞʀƤ ƄơƞƧʍƗʪ (fr. 367) 1 lm. add. Brunck2; (ƾƣƔʎơƤ s.) L

sch. 1194 – sch. 1207

249

1203 ơǵȯ μŪ ƘDzƣƖƔƥƔƜ : ơǵƔ ƛȱƞƘƜƤ ǎƣƖȯƥƔƥƛƔƜ ƝƔƦŪ ǎμơʝ ƢƔƦƣơƨȷƟƦƚƟ ƖƘƟȱƥƛƔƜ ƢƔƣƔƝƘƞƘƧȷμƘƟơƤ. L 1 lm. ex Lp (Lascaris): deest in L; (ơǵƔ s.) L

1204 ǿƢơʎƔ ƗƣƔƥƦȱŪ ǎƥƦƒƟ : ƦơƜƔʝƦȯ ƥơƜ ƢƔƣƔƝƘƞƘȹơμƔƜ ơǵƔ ƗƣɱƥƔƜ ǾƨƘȵƞƘƜƤŭ ƘȎƘƣƖƘƦȳƥƘƜƤ μƘ Ɩȯƣ. L 1 lm. ex Lp (Lascaris): deest in L; (ǿƢơʎƔ s.) L

1204–5 (ƢƔƦƣȶƤ – ǒƦƜ): ƠȱƟơƤ ƾƞƞŪ ơȎƝ ǎμȶƤ ȠƟ ƧǯȷƤ. L 1 lm. addidi

1206 (ǎƝƝƔƞʁ ): ƾƟƔƖƝȯƙƘƜƤ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

1207 (ƢƔƞƔμƟƔʎơƟ): ƾƞȯƥƦơƣƔ, μƜƔƜƨȷƟơƟ, ƔȎƦȷƩƘƜƣƔ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 cf. Ael. D. Ƣ 4 ƢƔƞƔμƟƔʎơƤŭ ƨơƟƘȸƤ Ǡ μƜƔƣȷƤ. ƢƔƞƔμƟƔʎơƜ ƖȮƣ ƞȱƖơƟƦƔƜ ơǯ ƗƜȮ ƩƘƜƣȶƤ ƾƟƗƣơƨơƟơʝƟƦƘƤ, ƢƔƣȮ ƦȲƟ ƢƔƞȯμƚƟ… = Paus. att. Ƣ 3 (‘Paus. fortasse abiundicandum’ Erbse) = Eudem. Rhet. 170b, 4–5 = Ɔ Ƣ 26 = Phot. 371, 13 = Su. Ƣ 46; Harp. 233, 3–4 …ƦơȸƤ ƔȎƦơƩƘƜƣȵɯ ƦƜƟȮƤ ƾƟƘƞȷƟƦƔƤ Ʀʁ ƢƔƞȯμɾ ƢƔƞƔμƟƔȵơƧƤ ǎƝȯƞơƧƟ… = Phot. 374, 23–4; Hesych. Ƣ 151 ƢƔƞƔμƟƔʎơƤŭ … ƨơƟƘȹƤ, ǿ ƔȎƦơƩƘƜƣȵɯ ƦƜƟȮ ƾƟƘƞȻƟ. ǿ ǎƟƘƩȷμƘƟơƤ μƜȯƥμƔƦƜ ơǮƝƘȵʪ; sch. Aesch. Eum. 448b ] ƦȶƟ ƨơƟȱƔ; sch. Ap. Rh. 291, 5 ƢƔƞƔμƟƔʎơƟ ƞȱƖƘƜ ƦȶƟ ƨȷƟơƟ ƘǮƣƖƔƥμȱƟơƟ… 1 lm. add. Elmsley μƜƔƜƨȷƟơƟ om. Ƈ

250

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

1211 (ƾƞƞŪ – ǒƣƖƔƥƔƜ): ƾƞƞŪ ƘǮ ƢƔƣƔƜƦʁ Ʀȶ ƾƟƘƞƘʎƟ μƘ, ƦȮ ǂƞƞƔ ƢơȵƚƥơƟ, ƦơƧƦȱƥƦƜ ƦȲƟ ȓƞƚƟ ƥƧƟȯƖƔƖƘ. L; cf. gl. in Ts.l. 1 lm. addidi; (ƾƞƞŪ s.) L ǒƣƖƔƥƔƜ nec plura T

ƾƞƞŪ – fin.] ǢƖơƧƟ ƦȲƟ ȓƞƚƟ ƥƧƟȯƖƔƖƘ gl. ad ƦǂƞƞƔ μŪ

1213 (Ǥ – ƢƞƑƣƫμƔ;): ȂƟƦƫƤ ơȔƟ ƢƞƚƣȻƥƘƜƤ ƦȲƟ ƢƧƣȮƟ ƦʀƤ ȓƞƚƤ; L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris; (Ǥ s.) L

1214–5 (ȃƥơƟ – ƢƣƏƠƫ): ƢȯƟƦƔ, ƨƚƥȵ, ƢơƜȳƥƫ ƢƞȲƟ Ʀơʝ ƥȻμƔƦơƤ ǃƪƔƥƛƔƜ. L T 1 lm. addidi 1–2 ƢƞȲƟ Ʀơʝ ƥưμƔƦơƤ ǃƪƔƥƛƔƜ] ƢƞȲƟ ǃƪƔƥƛƔƜ Ʀơʝ ƥưμƔƦƮƤ ƥơƧ Ƈ: ƢƞȲƟ Ʀơʝ ƥưμƔƦơƤ ǃƪƔƥƛƔƜ Bernardakis 63

1216–7a1 (ƾƞƞŪ – ƗƜƗơƯƤ): ƝƔȴ ƦƔʝƦƔ μȰƟ ƾƣƝȱƥƘƜ, ƕƣƔƩȸ ƗȰ ƦơȹƦơƜƤ ƢƣȷƥƛƘƤ. L 1 lm. addidi; (ƾƞƞŪ s.) L

1216–7a2 (ƾƞƞŪ – ƗƜƗơƯƤ): ơǵơƟ ƦƔʎƤ ǂƞƞƔƜƤ ƘȎƘƣƖƘƥȵƔƜƤ ƝƔȴ ǏƦȱƣƔƟ ƕƣƔƩƘʎƔƟ ƩȯƣƜƟ ƢƣȷƥƛƘƤ ƖȳμƔƤ ƦȲƟ ǶȷƞƚƟ. L 1–2 haec a sch. pr. separavi

1 lm. addidi

1221 (ƥŪ ǎƢƜƥƝȳƢƦƫ): ǎƟƦȱƞƞơμƔȵ ƥơƜ, ƢƔƣƣƘƖƖƧʬ. L Ts.l. 1 ǎƟƦƐƞƞơμƔƜ: cf. sch. Ai. 752 ǎƟƘƦƘƒƞƔƦơ; sch. Aesch. Pr. 664a ǎƢƜƥƝƑƢƦơƧƥƔ] ǎƟƦƘƞƞơμƐƟƚ; sch. Eur. Alc. 365 ubi ǎƢƜƥƝƑƪƫ per ǎƟƦƘƞơʝμƔƜ explicatur; id. Phoen. 774 (ad lm. ǎƢƜƥƝƑƢƦƫ) ǎƟƦƐƞƞơμƔƜ; Hesych. Ƙ 5179

251

sch. 1211 – sch. 1230–1

ǎƢƜƥƝƑƢƦƘƜŭ … ǎƟƦƐƞƞƘƦƔƜ; Ɔ Ƙ 727 ǎƢƜƥƝƚƢƦƮμƘƟơƤ: ǎƟƦƘƞƞƮμƘƟơƤ; Su. Ƙ 2083 … ǎƢƐƥƝƚƪƘƟ, ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǎƟƘƦƘƒƞƔƦơ 1 lm. add. Brunck2; (ǎƢƜƥƝƑƢƦƫ s.) L ƥơƜ om. T ƢƔƣƘƖƖƧʬ] ƢƔƣƘƖƖƧʬμƔƜ T

1224 (Ƣƣơƥƛơʝ ƗȯμƔƣƦƔ): ƖƧƟƔʎƝƔ ƢơȵƚƥơƟ. Ls.l.; cf. gl. in Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Papageorgiou ƖƧƟƔʎƝƔ ƢơȵƚƥơƟ] ƢơȵƚƥơƟ gl. ad ƢƣƮƥƛơƧ (paroxytonum) et ƖƧƟƔʎƝƔ gl. ad ƗƏμƔƣƦƔ nec plura T

1225–6 (μƚƗŪ – ƢơƦƐ ): ǂƦơƢơƟ Ɩȯƣ, ƨƚƥȵ, ƦȲƟ ǃƢƔƠ ƾƟƔƝƞƜƛƘʎƥȯƟ μơƜ ǏƦȱƣʪ ƠȱƟʪ ƢƔƣƔƝƔƛƘƧƗʀƥƔƜ. L T 1 lm. addidi ƖȮƣ om. Ƈ ƾƟƔƝƞƜƛƘʎƥƔƟ] ƥƧƟƔƟƔƝƞƜƛƘʎƥƔƟ Ƈ (coni. iam Heath 81): ƢƔƣƔƝƞƜƛƘʎƥƔƟ Nauck 434 2 ƠƐƟʪ om. Ƈ ƢƔƣƔƝƔƛƘƧƗʀƥƔƜ] ƢƔƣƔƝƔƛƘƯƗƘƜƟ Ƈ

1227 (ƝȳƗƘƧƥơƟ): ơǮƝƘȵƫƥƔƜ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley ơǮƝƘƒƫƥƔƜ] ơǮƝơƟƮμƚƥơƟ, ơǮƝƘƒƫƥơƟ T

1228 (μƘƖȯƞƔ ƢƜƥƦƘȹƥƔƟƦŪ ): ǎȮƟ ƖȮƣ ǎƟ ƦơʎƤ μƘȵƙơƥƜ ƛȱμƘƟơƤ . L 1 lm. addidi; (ƦƮ s.) L Papageorgiou

post ƛƐμƘƟơƤ in L duo puncta

post ƛƐμƘƟơƤ add. ƢƒƥƦƜƟ

1230–1 (Ʀȶ μƐƟ – ƨƐƣơƜ;): Ʀȶ ƛƧμơʝƥƛƔƜ, ƘǮ μȲ ƢƘƜƥƛƘȵƚƟ ƔȎƦʭ, ƝƔȴ Ʀȶ ƢƘȵƛƘƥƛƔƜ ȥƗƘ ƨƣơƟơʝƟƦƜ ƗƧƥƩƘƣȱƤ. L T 1 lm. addidi; enarratorem ƟơƥơʝƟƦƔ pro ƟơƥơʝƟƦƜ legisse coni. Wakefield (teste Wolff 191) ƛƧμơʝƥƛƔƜ] scil. ǧƣƔƝƞƐƔ 2 ƢƘƒƛƘƥƛƔƜ] scil. ǎμƐ (ƦȶƟ țƞƞơƟ)

252

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

1232 (ȟƤ – ƛƣơƘʎƤ): ơȓƦƫ ƞƔƞƘʎƤ ȟƤ μƚƗȰƟ ƢƣȯƠƫƟ ȥƟ ƞȱƖƫ. Ls.l. 1 lm. addidi

1233 ƦȵƤ Ɩȯƣ ƢơƛŪ ǣ μơƜ μƚƦƣȵ : Ʀȶ ƦȵƤ ǎƨŪ ǏƔƧƦơʝ ǒƛƚƝƘƟ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƢʬƤ ǀƟ ǎƖȺ ǏƞơȵμƚƟ ƖʀμƔƜ ƔȎƦȲƟ ƦȲƟ ƦʬƟ ƝƔƝʬƟ ƔǮƦȵƔƟ ơȔƥƔƟ; L T 1 lm. deest in Ƈ; accuratiss. 1233–6 ƦƒƤ ƖƏƣ – ǓƞơƜƦơ; ǒƛƚƝƘƟ] ƦƐƛƘƜƝƘƟ Ƈ fin.] ƦȲƟ ƝƔƝʬƟ ƔDzƦƜơƟ ơȔƥƏƟ ƥơƒ ƦƘ ƝƔȴ Ʀʁ ǎμʁ μƚƦƣƒ Ƈ

2 ƦȲƟ –

1235–6 (ƦƒƤ) ƦƔʝƦŪ ǂƟ, ȃƥƦƜƤ μȲ ŪƠ ƾƞƔƥƦȷƣƫƟ (Ɵơƥơʎ | ǓƞơƜƦơ;): ƦȵƤ ǀƟ ƦƔʝƦƔ ƢƣȯƦƦƘƜƟ ǓƞơƜƦơ ǎƝƦȶƤ ȠƟ μƔƟȵƔƤ ƝƔȴ ƛƘƚƞƔƥȵƔƤũ ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ơȎƝ ǀƟ ǏƞơȵμƚƟ, ƘǮ μȲ μƔƜƟơȵμƚƟ. L T 1 lm. L supplevi: deest in Ƈ, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 1233 coniungat 2 ƛƘƚƞƔƥȵƔƤ Ƈ (Lascaris): ƚƞƔƥƒƔƤ L, sine spiritu ǎƝƦȶƤ ȠƟ μƔƟȵƔƤ ƝƔȴ ƛƘƚƞƔƥȵƔƤ] ƝƔȴ ƛƘƚƞƔƥȵƔƤ ƝƔȴ μƔƟȵƔƤ ǎƝƦȶƤ ȠƟ T μƔƟƒƔƤ ƝƔȴ ƛƘƚƞƔƥƒƔƤ] μƔƟƒƔƤ ƛƘƚƞƏƦơƧ Nauck 434 renuente Bernardakis 63

1238–9 (ƟȱμƘƜƟ ǎμơȴ | ƨƛȵƟơƟƦƜ μơʎƣƔƟ): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ μȱƣơƤ ƘȎƢơƜȵƔƤ ƢƣơƥƟȱμƘƜƟ μơƜ. L T 1–2 sch. 1239 et 1238–9 in unum composuit et ita reformavit T: ƨƛƘƜƣơμƐƟʪ μơƜ, ƨƚƥƒƟ, ƘȎƢơƜƒƔƤ μƐƣơƤ ơȎ ƢƣơƥƟƐμơƜ ǂƟ 1 lm. addidi

1239 (ƨƛȵƟơƟƦƜ): ƨƛƘƜƣơμȱƟʪ. Ls.l. 1 cf. sch. Ant. 1013 ƨƛƒƟơƟƦŪ: … ƨƛƘƜƣƮμƘƟƔ vide ad sch. 1238–9.1–2 1 lm. add. Elmsley

sch. 1232 – sch. 1245

253

1241 (ȟƤ ǒơƜƝƔƤ) ȟƤ ƟơƥƘʎƤ, ƨƣȯƙƘƜƤ : ȟƤ ƨƔƟƘƣȶƤ ƘǴ ƟơƥʬƟ ƩƔƞƘƢʬƤ, ơȓƦƫƤ ƝƔȴ ƩƔƞƘƢʬƤ ƗƜƔƞƘƖȷμƘƟơƤ. L 1 lm. L supplevi; scholiasta ƨƣƏƙƘƜƤ pro ƨƣƏƥƘƜƤ legit

1242 ƥȸ Ɩȯƣ μŪ ƾƢŪ ƘȎƟƔƥƛȱƟƦơƤ : ƥȹ, ƨƚƥȵƟ, ƾƟƔƦƔƣȯƦƦƘƜƤ ƾƢȶ Ʀơʝ ƝƔƦƔƢƣƔƭƟƛȱƟƦơƤ ƝƔƝơʝ μȲ ƢƘƜƛȷμƘƟơƤ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. 1242 ƥȸ ƖƏƣ – ƝƔƝơʝ (lm.) ƾƢŪ ƘȎƟƔƥƛȱƟƦơƤ] ƾƢƘƧƟƔƥƛƐƟƦơƤ L ƥƯ, ƨƚƥƒƟ, om. Ƈ post ƥƯ add. μƘ Lascaris, sed facile subauditur ƾƟƔƦƔƣƏƦƦƘƜƤ – fin. ita retractavit T: ƢƣƔƭƟƛƐƟƦơƤ Ʀơʝ ƝƔƝơʝ, ƦƔƣƏƦƦƘƜƤ μȲ ƢƘƜƛƮμƘƟơƤ ƗƚƞơƟƮƦƜ

1243 ƗƘȵƞƔƜơƤ, ȟƤ ǎƤ Ƣơƞƞȯ : ǂƦơƢơƟ ƖȮƣ ƝƔȴ ǎƟƔƟƦƜơʝƥƛƔƜ ƝƔȴ ƢƘȵƛƘƥƛƔƜ, ƗƜŪ ȁ ƾƢơƣʬ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. 1243 ƗƘƒƞƔƜơƤ – ǒƩƫ

2 ƗƜŪ ȁ ƾƢơƣʬ om. T

1244 (ƗƜƝƔƜơʎƤ): ƗȵƝƔƜơƟ ƟơμȵƙƘƜƤ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris

1245 (ƾƞƞŪ ǎƝƗƜƗƔƩƛʬ – ƢƏƦƘƣ;): ƦơʝƦơ ƝƔƦŪ ǎƣȻƦƚƥƜƟ. ƢƣȶƤ ȁƟ ȃƦƜ ơȎƝ ǂƗƜƝơƟ ƦơʝƦơ ǟƖơʝμƔƜ ƾƞƞȮ ƘȎƥƘƕƐƤ, Ʀȶ ƢƘƜƛƔƣƩƘʎƟ Ʀʭ ƢƔƦƣƒ. L T 1 lm. addidi; pars ƢƣȶƤ ȃƟ – fin. ad v. 1246 spectat ƦơʝƦơ ƝƔƦŪ ǎƣưƦƚƥƜƟ om. Ƈ 1– 2 ƢƣȶƤ – fin.] huc traieci: post sch. 1247.2 ǶƮƞɾ demigraverunt in L: ut sui iuris scholium praebet Ƈ, omissis verbis ƢƣȶƤ ȁƟ ȃƦƜ ơȎƝ – fin.] haec ita reformavit Ƈ: ơȎƝ ǂƗƜƝơƟ ǟƖơʝμƔƜ, ƨƚƥƒ, Ʀȶ ƢƘƜƛƔƣƩƘʎƟ Ʀʭ ƢƔƦƣƒ, ƾƞƞȮ μɱƞƞơƟ ƘȎƥƘƕƐƤ, quibus vv. 1250–1, non v. 1246, explicat

254

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

1247 ƢƣƏƥƥƘƜƟ ǂƟƫƖƔƤ : ƗȵƝƔƜȷƟ ƥơƜ ƦơʝƦơ ƨƔȵƟƘƦƔƜ, Ʀȶ ƥƧƟƔƨƛʀƟƔȵ μƘ Ʀʁ Ƕȷƞɾũ L 1 lm. accuratiss. 1247 ƢƣƏƥƥƘƜƤ – ƦƏƗƘ;

2 μƘ ſ Lp (Lascaris): μƔƜ L

1249–50 (Ʀȶ ƥȶƟ) | ƛƘơʎƥƜ ƗƘƜƝƟȸƤ ǒƣƖơƟ : ƗƜƔμƔƣƦƧƣȯμƘƟơƤ ƦơȸƤ ƛƘơȸƤ ƖƔμȳƥƫ ƦȲƟ ǶȷƞƚƟ. L T 1 lm. L supplevi: deest in T, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 1245 coniungat (ƗƜƔμƔƣƦƧƣȯμƘƟơƤ ơȔƟ) ƦơȸƤ ƛƘơȸƤ] ƦơʎƤ ƛƘơʎƤ T 2 ƖƔμƑƥƫ] μƟƚƥƦƘƯƥơμƔƜ T

1252 (ƝƔƞʬƤ ƦƘƞƘƧƦɲƤ): ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƝƔƞʬƤ ƦȶƟ ƞȷƖơƟ ǎƢƘƣƔȵƫƥƔƤ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris

ǎƢƘƣƔȵƫƥƔƤ] ǎƦƘƞƘƒƫƥƔƤ T: ǎƢƘƣƏƦƫƥƔƤ Neue 602

1253 ȟƤ ƢƣȴƟ ǎμƢƘƥƘʎƟ : ȟƤ ƘǮƤ ƢƧƣȯƟ μƘ ƛʁƤ ƢƣȴƟ ƦƔƣƔƩƛʀƟƔƜ ȏƢȶ ƦʀƤ ƟȷƥơƧ. L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. 1253–4 ȟƤ – ƛʁƤ ȟƤ (alt.)] dzƟƔ T post ȟƤ add. ƢƣȴƟ L

1255a (ǎƖƝơƟƘʎƦŪ ): ǎƟƘƣƖƘʎƦƘ ƝƔȴ ƾƟƔƝơƧƨȵƥƔƦƘ. L Ts.l. cf. sch. Ai. 810b ǎƖƝơƟʬμƘƟ: … ǎƟƘƣƖʬμƘƟ; ibid. 988c ǎƖƝƮƟƘƜ: ǎƟƐƣƖƘƜ; sch. Ar. Plut. 255: DzƦŪ, ǎƖƝơƟƘʎƦƘ: ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ «ǎƟƘƣƖƘʎƦƘ», «ƦƔƩȹƟƔƦƘ»…; sch. Hom. Od. 7.340 ǎƖƝơƟƐơƧƥƔƜ] … ǎƟƘƣƖơʝƥƔƜ; sch. D Hom. Il. 24.648 ǎƖƝơƟƐơƧƥƔƜ: ǎƟƘƣƖơʝƥƔƜ; sch. Ap. Rh. 190, 5 ǎƖƝơƟƐơƟƦƘƤ: ǎƟƘƣƖơʝƟƦƘƤ; Hesych. Ƙ 139 ǎƖƝơƟƘʎƟŭ ǎƟƘƣƖƘʎƟ …; ibid. Ƙ 243 ǎƖƝơƟƐơƟƦƘƤŭ … ǎƟƘƣƖơʝƟƦƘƤ; Su. Ƙ 109 ǎƖƝơƟƘʎƦƘ: ǎƟƘƣƖƘʎƦƘ …; ibid. ơ 839 ǎƖƝơƟƑƥƘƜƤ: … ǎƟƘƣƖƑƥƘƜƤ; ibid. Ƙ 108 ƝƔȴ ǎƖƝơƟƘʎƟ, ǎƟƘƣƖƘʎƟ 1 lm. add. Brunck2, nisi quod ǎƖƝơƟƘʎƦƘ pro ǎƖƝơƟƘʎƦŪ scripsit ƾƟƔƝơƧƨȵƥƔƦƘ] ƾƟ. μƘ T

ǎƟƘƣƖƘʎƦƘ ƝƔȴ om. T

sch. 1247 – sch. 1260–1

255

1255b ƢƔʝƞȯ ƦơƜ ƝƔƝʬƟ : μȷƟƚ ƖȮƣ ƾƟȯƢƔƧƥƜƤ Ʀȶ ƢƔƣƔƛƘʎƟƔȵ μƘ Ʀʭ ƢƧƣȴ ƝƔȴ ƦơƜƔȹƦɾ ƦƘƞƘƧƦʁ ƩƣȳƥƔƥƛƔƜ. L T 1 ƾƟƏƢƔƧƥƜƤ: cf. sch. Ph. 1329 ƢƔʝƞƔƟ: ƾƟƏƢƔƧƥƜƟ; Hesych. Ƣ 1145 ƢƔʝƞƔŭ … ƾƟƏƢƔƧƥƜƤ; Ɔ Ƣ 256 ƢƔʝƞƔŭ ƾƟƏƢƔƧƥƜƤ = Phot. 403, 5 = Su. Ƣ 806 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. 1255–6 ƢƔʝƞƔ – ȏƥƦƏƦƚ ƔȓƦƚ ƾƟƏƢƔƧƥƒƤ ǎƥƦƜ ƦʬƟ ƝƔƝʬƟ, ƨƚƥƒ, T

μƮƟƚ ƖȮƣ ƾƟƏƢƔƧƥƜƤ] μƮƟƚ

1259 ǂƖƘ ƟƧƟ ƢƣȴƟ ƦȳƟƗŪ ƾƟƔƝƜƟʀƥƔƜ : ǏƔƧƦȶƟ ƢƔƣƔƛƔƣƣȹƟƘƜ ȣƥƦƘ μȲ ƕơɱƟ ƝơμƜƙȷμƘƟơƟ ƘǮƤ ƦȲƟ ƢƧƣȯƟ. ǂƖƘ ơȔƟ, ƨƚƥȵƟ, Ȥ ƥƝƞƚƣȮ ƪƧƩȳ, ȟƤ ƾƢȶ ƩƔƞƧƕƒƟơƧ ƥƜƗȳƣơƧ ƢƘƢơƜƚμȱƟƚ, ƢƣȴƟ ƦȳƟƗƘ ƾƟƔƝƜƟʀƥƔƜ ƟȷƥơƟ, ǎƟƗơʝƥƔ Ʀȶ ƥƘƔƧƦʀƤ ƥƦȷμƔ ǎμƨƣƔƖʀƟƔƜ, ȟƥƔƟƘȴ ƥƦȷμƔ ƨƣȱƔƦơƤ ƞȵƛʪ 5 ƝƘƝơƞƞƚμȱƟơƟ ƢƣȶƤ Ʀȶ μƚƝȱƦƜ ȓƗƫƣ ƾƟƜμɱƥƛƔƜ. L T 1 lm.] ǂƖƘ ƟʝƟ ƢƣȴƟ ƦʀƟƗŪ ƾƟƔƝƜƟʀƥƔƜ L: deest in T; scholiastam ita interpunxisse conicias ǂƖƘ ƟƧƟ, ƢƣȴƟ ƦƑƟƗŪ ƾƟƔƝƜƟʀƥƔƜ | ƟƮƥơƟ, Ȥ ƪƧƩȲ ƥƝƞƚƣȮ ƩƏƞƧƕơƤ, | ƞƜƛơƝƮƞƞƚƦơƟ ƥƦƮμƜơƟ ƢƔƣƐƩơƧƥŪ; accuratiss. 1259–62 ǂƖƘ – ƕơƑƟ 2 ǂƖƘ ơȔƟ, ƨƚƥȵƟ] ƝƔƒ, ƨƚƥƒƟ, ǂƖƘ T 2 ȟƤ – 3 ƢƘƢơƜƚμƐƟƚ] ƩƏƞƧƕơƤ, ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƥƜƗƚƣơƦƐƣƔ ƥƜƗƑƣơƧ, T 3 ƩƔƞƧƕƒƟơƧ scripsi: ƩƔƞƧƕƜƟơʝ L: ƩƔƞƧƕƜƝơʝ Lascaris, at quidni dici potest ƩƔƞƯƕƜƟơƤ (cf. ƞƒƛƜƟơƤ, ƠƯƞƜƟơƤ, ƢƘƯƝƜƟơƤ)? ‘usitata forma est ƩƔƞƧƕƗƜƝơʝ’ Dindorf 74 ƦƑƟƗƘ] ƦʀƟƗƘ L 4 ǎƟƗơʝƥƔ] ǎƟƗƜƗơʝƥƔ Bernardakis 63 Ʀȶ ƥƘƔƧƦʀƤ ƥƦȷμƔ] Ʀȶ ƥƦȷμƔ Ʀȶ ƥƘƔƧƦʀƤ T ƥƘƔƧƦʀƤ T: ƥƘƔƧƦơʝ L 5 ƝƘƝơƞƞƚμƐƟơƟ T: ƝƘƝơƞƞƚμƐƟơƧ L ƾƟƜμɱƥƛƔƜ] ƾƟ., ƾƟƏƢƔƧƘ ƦȲƟ ƕơȲƟ T

1260 (Ȥ ƪƧƩȲ ƥƝƞƚƣȮ ƩƏƞƧƕơƤ): ƞƘȵƢƘƜ [ƗȰ] Ʀȶ ȟƤ, ȟƤ ƾƢȶ ƩȯƞƧƕơƤ ƖƘƟơμȱƟƚ. L 1–2 haec a sch. pr. separavi coniunxisse apparet ƗȰ delevi

1 lm. addidi; scholiastam ƩƏƞƧƕơƤ cum ƪƧƩƑ

1260–1 (ƩƏƞƧƕơƤ | ƞƜƛơƝȷƞƞƚƦơƟ ƥƦȷμƜơƟ ƢƔƣȱƩơƧƥŪ ): ƞȵƛƜƟơƟ ƝƔȴ ƥƝƞƚƣȶƟ ƩƔƞƜƟȶƟ ƥƔƧƦʁ ǎƢƜƕƔƞơʝƥƔ. L T 1 lm. scripsit Elmsley, nisi quod pro ƢƔƣƐƩơƧƥ’ dedit ƢƔƣƐƩơƧƥƔ: ƞƜƛơƝƮƞƞƚƦơƟ ƗȰ ƥƦƮμƜơƟ T, quippe qui hoc sch. cum sch. 1259 coniungat: deest in L; scholiastam

256

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

ƩƏƞƧƕơƤ cum ƥƦƮμƜơƟ coniunxisse cunctanter conieci 2 ƥƔƧƦʁ] ƥƘƔƧƦʁ T 63

ƞƒƛƜƟơƟ] ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ƞ. T ǎƢƜƕƔƞơʝƥƔ] ǎμƕƔƞơʝƥƔ Nauck 435: ǎμƕƏƞƞơƧƥƔ Bernardakis

1262 ƾƟȯƢƔƧƘ ƕơȳƟ : ƾƟȯƢƔƧƥơƟ ƦȲƟ ƕơȲƟ ȟƤ ƘǮƤ ǎƢȵƩƔƣƦơƟ ǃμƔ ƝƔȴ ƾƝơȹƥƜơƟ ƢƣɱƖμƔ ƩƫƣơʝƥƔ, ƦȲƟ ƢƧƣȯƟ. ƢʬƤ ƗȰ ǎƢȵƩƔƣƦơƟ ƝƔȴ ƾƝơȹƥƜơƟ; ǎƢȵƩƔƣƦơƟ μȰƟ ȃƦƜ ƾƢƔƞƞȯƦƦƘƦƔƜ ƦʀƤ ƟȷƥơƧ, ƾƝơȹƥƜơƟ ƗȰ ȃƦƜ ƞƧƢƘʎ ƢȯƟƦƔ ǟ ƾƢơƥƦȱƣƚƥƜƤ Ʀơʝ ƕȵơƧŭ ƢƔƣȮ Ʀȶ 5 ǏƝȺƟ ƾȱƝơƟƦȵ ƖƘ ƛƧμʭ. L T 5 Hom. Il. 4.43 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. 1262–3 ƾƟƏƢƔƧƘ – ǒƣƖơƟ; ‘ƦƘƞƐơƧƥ’ fortasse legit ƾƟȯƢƔƧƥơƟ] ƾƟƏƢƔƧƘ T ƘǮƤ T (Lascaris): om. L 2 ƝƔȴ] ǃμƔ ƝƔȴ T 4 ƢƏƟƦƔ] ƢƏƟƦơƦƘ T

scholiasta’ Dindorf2 275

1264 ƔDzƣƘƦŪ, ǾƢƔƗơȵ : ơȎƝ ơǮƝȱƦƔƜƤ ƾƞƞȮ ƦơʎƤ ƾƝơƞơƧƛơʝƥƜƟ ƔȎƦʭ ǎƠ ŹȎƕơȵƔƤ ƨƚƥȵ. L T 1 lm.] ǾƢƔƗơȸƤ T ơȎƝ ơǮƝƐƦƔƜƤ … ƦơʎƤ ƾƝơƞơƧƛơʝƥƜƟ] ơȎƝ ơǮƝƐƦƔƤ … ƦơȸƤ ƾƝơƞơƧƛơʝƟƦƔƤ, haud male, T

1265 ƥƧƖƖƟƫμơƥȹƟƚƟ : ƾƟƦȴ ƥƧƖƖƟȻμƚƟ, ȃƦƜ ƝƔƦȮ ƖƟȻμƚƟ ƢƔƦƣʫƔƟ ƦơʝƦơ ƢơƜʬ. L T 1 haec separatim leguntur in L: cum sch. 1264 coniunguntur in T (ƝƔȴ Ʀȶ ƥƧƖƖƟƫμơƥƯƟƚƟ); pars ȃƦƜ (1) – fin. ad lm. 1264–5 μƘƖƏƞƚƟ – ƥƧƖƖƟƫμơƥƯƟƚƟ spectat ƾƟƦȴ] ƾƟ. Ʀơʝ T

1268 ơDZ ƨȹƥƔƟƦƘƤ ƝƔȴ ƝƞɾƙȷμƘƟơƜ : ƘǮƤ ƦȶƟ ŸȵƔ ǟ ƾƢȷƦƔƥƜƤ Ʀơʝ ƞȷƖơƧŭ ǎƝƘȵƟơƧƤ, ƨƚƥȵƟ, ƾƖƟȻμơƟƔƤ ǟƖƘʎƥƛƘ ơdzƦƜƟƘƤ ƖƘƟƟȳƥƔƟƦƘƤ ƔȎƦȶƟ ƢƘƣƜơƣʬƥƜ ƦơƜƔʝƦƔ ƢȯƥƩơƟƦƔ. L T 1 lm. deest in T; accuratiss. 1268–9 ơDZ – ƢƏƛƚ

sch. 1260–1 – sch. 1275

257

1270 (ǎƨơƣɲ ): ƢƘƣƜƦƦȲ ǟ ƢƣȷƛƘƥƜƤ. L; cf. sch. reformatum in Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Lascaris sch. ita retractavit T: ƾƟƦȴ Ʀơʝ ǿƣɲ

1272 (ƔǮƥƩƣȮ ƗŪ ǎƝƘȵƟơƜƤ): ƦơʎƤ ƖƘƟƟȳƥƔƥƜƟ ǎƢơƟƘȵƗƜƥƦƔ. L Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley ǎƢơƟƘƒƗƜƥƦƔ] ȞƟƘƒƗƜƥƦƔ Ƈ

1274 (Ʀʭ ƦȳƟƗŪ ǂƦƚƟ ȏƢȱƩơƟƦƜ): Ʀʭ ǧƣƔƝƞƘʎ. Ls.l. Ts.l. 1 lm. add. Elmsley

1275–8 (ƞƘƒƢơƧ – źƘƯƤ): ƩơƣȷƤŭ ƦƜƟȰƤ țƞƞơƤ. L 1 lm. addidi

1275 ƞƘȵƢơƧ μƚƗȰ ƥȹ, ƢƔƣƛȱƟƘ : ǒơƜƝƘƟ țƞƞơƤ ƾƢơƥƦƣƔƨƘȴƤ ƦƔʎƤ ƾƢȶ Ʀơʝ Ʃơƣơʝ ƞȱƖƘƜƟ Ʀơʝ μȲ ƾƢơƞƜμƢȯƟƘƥƛƔƜ ƦʬƟ ơDzƝƫƟ, ǓƫƤ ǀƟ ǎƢƔƟȱƞƛƫƥƜƟ ƾƢȶ ƦʀƤ ƢƧƣɱƤ. ƦƜƟȰƤ ƗȰ ƖƣȯƨơƧƥƜƟ ǎƢŪ ơDzƝƫƟŭ ƦơƧƦȱƥƦƜ μƚƗȰ ȏμƘʎƤ ƢƘƣƜƞƘȵƢƘƥƛƘ ǎƟƦƔʝƛƔ, ƾƞƞŪ ƾƝơƞơƧƛȳƥƔƦƘ. L; cf. sch. 5 retractatum in T 1 lm.] ƞƘȵƢơƧ μȲ Ƈ; accuratiss. 1275 ƞƘƒƢơƧ μƚƗȰ ƥƯ, ƢƔƣƛƐƟƘ, ƾƢŪ ơDzƝƫƟ (scholiastam ƾƢŪ ơDzƝƫƟ pro ǎƢŪ ơDzƝƫƟ legisse apparet) 1–3 ǒơƜƝƘƟ – ƢƧƣɱƤ om. Ƈ (ǎƢŪ ơDzƝƫƟ apud poetam praebet T) 2 Ʀơʝ (alt.) del Papageorgiou, at vide LSJ s.v. μƑ B.5.b: Ʀȶ Wolff 64 3 ǎƢƔƟƐƞƛƫƥƜƟ a (coni. iam Elmsley): ǎƢƐƞƛƫƥƜƟ L ƦƜƟȰƤ – fin.] haec ita reformavit Ƈ: Ɣǯ Ʀơʝ Ʃơƣơʝ ƢƣȶƤ ǏƔƧƦȮƤ ƦơʝƦƮ ƨƔƥƜŭ μȲ ƗȰ ȏμƘʎƤ ƢƘƣƜƞƘƒƢƚƥƛƘ ǎƟƦƔʝƛƔ ǎƢȴ ƦʬƟ ơDzƝƫƟ, ƾƞƞŪ ƾƝơƞơƧƛƑƥƔƦƘ. Ɩƣ. L

258

Scholia vetera in Sophoclis Trachinias

1277 (ƝƔƜƟơƢƔƖʀ ): ƟƘơƝƔƦƔƥƝƘȹƔƥƦƔ. Ls.l. cf. sch. Aesch. Th. 642g ƝƔƜƟơƢƚƖƐƤ] ƟƘơƝƔƦƔƥƝƘƯƔƥƦơƟ 1 lm. add. Elmsley; hoc legisse annotatorem pro ƝƔƜƟơƢƔƛʀ conicias

1278a1 (ȃ ƦƜ μȲ źƘƯƤ): ƞƘȵƢƘƜ Ʀȶ ǎƢơȵƚƥƘƟŭ ŸȵƔ ƗȰ ƦȲƟ ƘǯμƔƣμȱƟƚƟ ǣƦƜƤ ƝƔȴ ƝƔƝʬƟ ǎƥƦƜƟ ƔǮƦȵƔ. L 1 lm. addidi ŸƒƔ Elmsley: ƗƜȮ L add. ƝƔƝʬƟ Lascaris

2 ƝƔƝʬƟ scripsi: ƾƖƔƛʬƟ L quo servato post ǣƦƜƤ

1278a2 (ȃ ƦƜ μȲ źƘƯƤ): ƞƘȵƢƘƜ Ʀȶ ǎƢơȵƚƥƘƟ. Ls.l. a(AUY) 1 hoc sch. h.l. collocavit a: voci ƢơƞƞƏ v. 1277 superscripsit L

lm. addidi Ʀȶ om. a

1278a3 (ȃ ƦƜ μȲ źƘƯƤ): ơȎƗȰƟ ƦơȹƦƫƟ ơȎƗƘȴƤ ǒƢƣƔƠƘƟ, ƘǮ μȲ μȷƟơƤ ǿ źƘȹƤ. L 1 lm. addidi

Indices

Scriptores in scholiis laudati Adespota Aratus Aristocrates Aristophanes Callimachus Creophilus Didymus Euripides Herodorus Herodotus Hesiodus

Homerus

Isocrates Menecrates Nysaensis Oraculum Pherecydes Pindarus

tragica: fr. 460 Kannicht-Snell: 296

Phaenom. 225: 130–1 FGrHist 591 fr. dub. 6: 266 Vesp. 1428: 394b fr. 303 Pfeiffer: 7b; fr. 679: 308a

Oech. Hal. fr. 3 Bernabé = fr. 3 Davies: 266 ƇƣƔƖƜƝȲ ƞƐƠƜƤ fr. 90 Schmidt: 1159 Hipp. 223: 29a; Med. 48: 144–9; fr. 1021 Kannicht: 172 FGrHist 31 fr. 33: 253 II 57: 172

Th. 312: 1098a; 321: 520a; 530: 116 Op. 30: 56–7 Sc. 353–4: 40 fr. 26.27–31 et 31a Merkelbach-West: 266; fr. 240: 1167a Il. 2. 393: 711; 2.527: 788; 2.535: 788; 2.606 = 3.305 = 8.499 = 12.115 = 13.724 = 18.174 = 23.64 = 23.297: 327a; 2.742: 207–8c; 2.750 = 16.234 = Od. 14.327 = 19.296: 171–2; 4.43: 1262; 4.151 = 4.214: 680a; 4.223: 597; 4.539–40: 21b; 5.255: 7b et 181; 3.179: 556a; 10.298 = 10.469 = 23.806: 50; 10.521: 558a; 11.105: 779b; 12.463 = 14.261: 94; 16.7–8: 1071; 16.162: 558a; 17.447: 1160; 21.237: 13a; 22.308: 513; 22.467: 1160; 23.795: 888; 24.527–8: 126–7; 24.725: 550–1 Od. 2.267 = 13.221 = 20.30: 1010–1; 5.337: 636; 9.301: 931; 11.109 = 12.323: 96–8 et 102a; 14.327 = 19.296 = Il. 2.750 = 16.234,: 171–2; 17.219, 21.362: 284 1, 8: 117b2 FHG II 344–5 Müller: 352–5 53 Parke – Wormell: 1a FGrHist. 3 fr. 82a: 352–5 fr. 58 Maehler: 172; Olymp. 2.15–17: 742–3

Verba de quibus scholia agunt ǂƕơƧƞơƤ 140 ǂƖƖơƤ 622 ƾƖƐƟƚƦơƤ 742–3 ƾƖƐƟƟƚƦơƤ 61 ƾƖƟưμƫƟ 473 ƾƖơƣƏ 372a, b ƾƖơƣƔȴ ƄƧƞƏƦƜƗƘƤ 638 ƾƖƩƜƥƦƑƣ 256 ǂƖƞƫƥƥơƤ 1060 ƾƖƯμƟƔƥƦơƤ 1083–4 ƾƖưƟƜơƤ 26 ƾƗƏƝƣƧƦơƤ 106–7a ƿƗƜƟƮƤ 847a ǂƘƛƞơƟ 506 ƾƘƒƣƘƥƛƔƜ 216 ƾƐƞƜơƤ 835 ǂƙƚƞơƤ 284, 745 ǂƛƜƝƦơƤ ƛƘƣμʀƤ ƾƝƦʎƟơƤ 685–6 ƔǯμƔƦƚƣƮƤ 766 ƔǮƮƞơƤ 94 ƔǮƢƘƜƟƮƤ 856–9a1, 858 ƔDzƣƘƜƟ 794a ƾʍƥƥƘƜƟ 842 ƔǮƥƩƣƮƤ 1272 ƔǮƦƘʎƟ 96 ƔǮƩμƏƙƘƜƟ 355b ƾƝƑƞƚƦơƤ 998 ƾƝƑƣƧƝƦơƤ 45 ƾƞƔƞƑ 206 ƾƞƔμƢƑƤ 691 ƿƞƜơʝƟ 258a ǂƞƞɾ 907 ƾƞƞƮƛƣơƧƤ 841–5, 844a, b ǂμƜƝƦơƤ 1095 ǂμμƜƖƔ 837–8 ƾμƨƒ 937 ƾμƨƒƖƧơƤ 504

ƾμƨƒƛƣƘƢƦơƤ 572 ƾμƨƒƝƞƧƥƦơƤ 780 ƾμƨƜƟƘƜƝƑƤ 104 ƾμƨƜƟƘƒƝƚƦơƤ 527 ƾμƨƒƢƞƘƝƦơƤ 520b ƾμƨƒƢơƞơƤ 860a, b ƾƟƔƗƔƒƘƜƟ 765–7 ƾƟƔƗơƩƑ 824, 825b ƾƟƔƙƐƘƜƟ 702a ƾƟƏƞƖƚƦơƤ 126–7 ƾƟƏμƜƖƗƔ 519 ƾƟƔμƢƞƏƝƚƦơƤ 119, 120 ƾƟƔƟƘơʝƥƛƔƜ 396 ǂƟƔƣƛƣơƤ 1103 ƾƟƏƣƥƜơƤ 640–3, 641 ǂƟƔƧƗơƤ 968 ƾƟƐƞƢƜƥƦơƤ 673 ƾƟƘμƐƥƚƦơƤ 1031b ƾƟƘμƮƘƜƤ 953 ƾƟƐơƣƦơƤ 894 ƾƟƘƧƨƚμƘʎƟ 783 ƾƟƐƩƘƥƛƔƜ 276 ƾƟƑƝƘƜƟ 1018b ƾƟƑƣ 550–1 ƾƟƑƣƘƜƤ 460 ƾƟƑƣƜƛμơƤ 247 ƾƟƛƘʎƟ 1089 ǂƟƛơƤ μƔƟƒƔƤ 999 ƾƟƜƥƦơƣƘʎƟ 317 ƾƟƒƥƩƘƜƟ 203–4 ƾƟƦƔƟƒƥƦƔƥƛƔƜ 441–2 ƾƟƦƒƞƧƣơƤ 643a1, a2, a3 ƾƟƦƜƢƐμƢƘƜƟ 540–2 ƾƟƦƒƢƣʪƣơƤ 223 ƾƟƦƒƥƢƔƥƦơƤ 770a ƾƟƯƘƥƛƔƜ 993 ƾƟưƟƧμơƤ 377–8

Verba de quibus scholia agunt

ƾƠƯμƕƞƚƦơƤ 694 ƾơƜƗƮƤ 1000 ǂơƝƟơƤ 841b, 841–5 ƾơƞƞƑƤ 513 ƾƢƔƖơƣƘƯƘƜƟ 789 ǂƢƔƜƤ 911a ƾƢƔƣƏƕƞƚƦơƤ 694 ƾƢƔƣƏƥƥƘƜƟ 1015 ǂƢƞƔƦơƤ 1093a ƾƢơƜƝƒƙƘƜƟ 955 ƾƢƮƢƦơƞƜƤ 647, 647–9 ƾƢơƦƒƕƔƦơƤ 1030 ƾƢơƦƣƯƘƜƟ 124 ƾƢơƨƐƣƘƜƟ 614 ǂƢƧƣơƤ 685–6 ƾƣƔʎơƤ 1202 ƾƣƏƥƛƔƜ 48 ƾƣƝƘʎƟ 710, 711 ǂƣƟƧƥƛƔƜ μƏƛƚƥƜƟ 710 ǂƣơƦơƤ 69, 824, 824–5, 825a ǂƣƥƚƟ 1196–7 ƾƣƦƚƣƒƔ 1054 ƾƣƦƒƝơƞƞơƤ 768 ƾƣƦƒƢơƧƤ 58 ƾƣƦƒƩƣƜƥƦơƤ 687 ƾƣƩƔʎơƤ 1b ǂƥƚμơƤ 866 ǂƥƝơƢơƤ 246 ǂƥƢƘƦơƤ 961 ƾƦƔƣƕƑƤ 21b ǂƦƚ 1104 ƾƦƚƣƮƤ 264b ǂƦơμơƤ 200 ƔȎƛƔƒμƫƟ 1041 ƔȎƞưƟ 100a, b ƔȒƣƔ 953 ƔȎƦƮƝƞƚƦơƤ 392 ƔȎƦƮƩƘƜƣ 1194 ƔȒƦƫƤ 1039 ǂƨƔƣ 529, 821b1 ƾƨƔƣƢƏƙƘƜƟ 548–9a, b ǂƨƣƔƥƦơƤ 694, 1057a ǂƩƟƔ 847b, 848b

ŶƔƝƩƘʎơƤ 510–1 ƕƏƞƞƘƜƟ 709 ƔǮƦƒɯ 939 ƕƏƥƜƤ 339 ƕƒơƦơƤ 1021–2 ƕƞƔƥƦƏƟƘƜƟ 401 ƕƞƏƥƦƚ 382a ƕơɱƟ 212 ƕơƦƮƟ 690a, b ƕơƧƛƘƣƑƤ 188a, b, c ƕơƯƝƣƔƟơƤ 13a ƕƣƯƝƘƜƟ 987, 1072 ƕƣƧƩɱƥƛƔƜ 805 ƕƣʬμƔ ƢƣƒơƟơƤ 699 ƖƘƯƘƥƛƔƜ 1101 ƖƞƫƩƒƟ 680a ƖɿƦƚƤ 32 ƗƔƒƟƧƥƛƔƜ 771, 1088 ƗƏƝƟƘƥƛƔƜ 254 ƗƔƝƣƧʛʜơƘʎƟ 326 ƗƏƥƝƜơƤ 13b ƗƘƒƞƔƜơƤ 1028b ƗƘƜƟƮƤ 1135 ƗƐƩƘƥƛƔƜ 628 ƗƜƔƬƥƦơʝƟ 881 ƗƜƔʛʜƔƒƟƘƜƟ 13b ƗƜƔƣƣơƜƙƘʎƟ 568 ƗƜƔƥƢƘƒƣƘƜƟ 781, 781–2 ƗƜƗƔƝƦƮƤ 671 ƗƜƑƟƘμơƤ 327a ƗƒƝƔƜơƤ 409, 411b ƗƜƝƔƜơʝƟ 1244 ƗơƞƮμƧƛơƤ 840a, b ƗơƞơƢơƜƮƤ 831–2 ƗƣʝƤ 766 ƗƧƥƔƢƏƞƞƔƝƦơƤ 959, 959–61 ƗƯƥƝƣƜƦơƤ 947 ƗƯƥƟƜƢƦơƤ 683 ǒƖƝƔƣƢơƤ 238b ǎƖƝƔƦƔƥƝƑƢƦƘƜƟ 1087 ǎƖƝƞƘƒƘƥƛƔƜ 579 ǎƖƝơƟƘʎƟ 1255a ǓƗƣƔ 1152

263

264 ƘǮƝƔƛƘʎƟ 1177 ƘǮƝƔƥƦƮƤ 699 ƘǮƝƐƟƔƜ 1241 ƘǮƥƖƣƏƨƘƥƛƔƜ 1167b ǎƝƝƔƞƘʎƟ 1206 ǎƝƝƜƟƘʎƟ 1242 ǎƝƞƯƘƥƛƔƜ 21a ǎƝƞƫƢƒƙƘƜƟ 925b ǎƝƣƔƒƟƘƜƟ 781–2 ǎƝƦƘƒƟƘƜƟ 678b ǒƝƦơƢơƤ 32, 1132 ǎƝƨƐƣƘƜƟ 824 ǎƝƨƐƣƘƥƛƔƜ ƟƒƝƔƤ 497d, e ǏƞƜƝƦƮƤ 12 ǎμμƐμơƟƔ 981, 981–2 ǎμƢƘƞƏƙƘƜƟ 748 ǎμƢƒƢƦƘƜƟ 1253 ǒμƢƞƘơƤ 1020a ǎμƢơƞɱƥƛƔƜ 250a ǎμƢƮƞƚμƔ 536–7, 538 ǎμƨƔƟʬƤ 608 ǎƟƗƔƦƘʎƥƛƔƜ 791a1, a2 ǎƟƘʎƟƔƜ 590–1 ǎƟƛƘƣμƔƒƟƘƥƛƔƜ 368 ǎƟƛƯμƜơƤ 109 ǒƟƟƧƩơƤ 501 ǎƠƔƖơƣƘƯƘƜƟ 350a ǎƠƔƒƣƘƜƟ 147 ǎƠƔƨƒƘƥƛƔƜ 72 ǎƠƐƣƩƘƥƛƔƜ 505–6 ǎƠƑƝƘƜƟ 1157–8 ǎƠƮμƜƞơƤ 964 ǎƠơƣμɱƟ 1089 ǎƢƏƝƦƜơƤ 1151 ǎƢƔƝƦƮƤ 259, 491a1 ǎƢƘƟƛƣʫƥƝƘƜƟ 917 ǓƢƘƥƛƔƜ ƝƔƝơʎƤ 1074 ǎƢƜƥƝƑƢƦƘƜƟ 1221 ǒƢơƧƣơƤ 953 ǎƢƜƙƘʎƟ 840c ǎƢƜμƐƟƘƜƟ 1176a1, a2 ǎƢƜʛʜơƛƘʎƟ 264a

Indices

ǎƢƜƥƝƜƏƙƘƜƟ 914 ǎƢƜƥƦƐƟƘƜƟ 947 ǎƢƜƥƦƣƐƨƘƜƟ 566, 1182 ǒƢơƤ ƛƘơƢƣƮƢơƟ 821a ǒƢơƧƣơƤ 953 ǎƢưμơƦơƤ 1188 ǎƣƖƏƙƘƥƛƔƜ 1232 ǒƣƚμơƤ 905a ǓƣƝơƤ ǯƘƣƮƟ 607 ƥƨƣƔƖʎƗơƤ 615 ǓƣƢƘƜƟ 815, 1010b ƢƣƮƥƫ 547 ǎƣƯƝƘƜƟ 119 ǒƣƩƘƥƛƔƜ 849a ǏƥƦƜʬƦƜƤ 953, 954 ƘȎƧƨƑƤ 602a ƘȎμƔƛƑƤ 614 ƘȎμƏƣƘƜƔ 193, 193–5 ƘȎƟƏƙƘƜƟ 106, 1005b ƘȎƟƏƙƘƥƛƔƜ 1242 ƘȎƟƚƦƑƣ 922 ƘȎƩƑ 240 ǎƨƔƣμƮƙƘƜƟ 623b ǎƨƐƥƦƜơƤ 206, 607 ǎƨƒƘƥƛƔƜ 286a ǎƨơƣɱƟ 888 ƙƘƯƖƟƧƥƛƔƜ 536–7 ƙʀƟ 1169 ƙƯƖƔƥƦƣơƟ 692 ǟƗơƟƑ 147 ɓ 573 ƛɱƝơƤ 23 ƛƏƞƢƘƜƟ 1082 ƛƏƞƢƘƥƛƔƜ 697 ƛƔʝμƔ 673 ƛƐƞƖƘƜƟ 355a ƛơƮƤ 857 ƛƣơƘʎƟ 1232 ƛƣơμƕưƗƚƤ 702b ƛƣʫƥƝƘƜƟ 1028a ƛƧμƮƤ 1134 ƛƧƦƑƣ 612 ǮƔƦơƣƒƔ 1000

Verba de quibus scholia agunt

ǯƗƣʝƥƛƔƜ 68 ǯƘƣƏ, ƦƏ (pro subst.) 993 dzƘƥƛƔƜ 514 dzƞƘƫƤ 763–4 žƔƗμơƖƘƟƑƤ 116 ƝƔƜƟƒƙƘƜƟ 867 ƝƔƜƟơƢƔƖƑƤ 1277 ƝƔƜƟƮƤ 613, 1164 ƝƔƝʁ 939 Ɲǂƞƞɾ (ƝƔȴ ǂƞƞɾ) 907 ƝƔƟƔƩƑ 640–3, 641, 643a2 ƝƏƣƔ 781, 781–2, 1015 ƝƏƦƔƖμƔ 695a, b ƝƔƦƔƗƐƣƝƘƥƛƔƜ 999 ƝƔƦƘƜƗƐƟƔƜ 86 ƝƔƦơƧƣƒƙƘƜƟ 827, 827–8, 828 ƝƘƞƔƜƟƮƤ 856a, 856–9a1 ƝƘƯƛƘƜƟ ƥƜƖʁ 988 ƝƚƗƘƯƘƜƟ 1227 ƝƚƞƚƦƑƣƜơƤ 575 ƝƑƣ 454a1, a2 ƝƜƟƘʎƟ 974 ƝƞƔƒƘƥƛƔƜ 153 ƝƞʎμƔƠ 520c ƝƞƯƘƜƟ 863 ƝƔƝʬƤ 721 ƝơƜƟƫƟƮƤ ƝƔƝơʝ 729–30 ƝơμƑƦƚƤ 567 ƝƣƔƦƜƥƦƘƯƘƜƟ 102b ƝƣƚƟƔʎơƤ 13b, 14 ƝƣƚƢƒƤ 993 ƝƣƜƦƮƤ 27b ƝƣơƧƟơƒ 13b ƝƣƯƨƜơƤ 360a1 ƝƦʀƟơƤ 690a ƝƦʀƥƜƤ 230a1 ƝƦƒƙƘƜƟ 898 ƞƔμƢƣƮƤ 1174 ƞƏƥƝƘƜƟ 824 ƞƔƦƣƘƯƘƜƟ 35 ƞƏƦƣƜƤ 70b ƞƘƯƥƥƘƜƟ 829

ƞƚƣƘʎƟ 434–5a ƞƜƖƟƯƤ 794a, b ƞƜƛơƝƮƞƞƚƦơƤ 1259, 1260–1 ƞƒμƟƚ 636 ƞƮƖơƤ 1a ƞƧƖƒƙƘƥƛƔƜ 779a, c ƞƯƢƚμƔ 554 ƞưƕƚ 995–6 ƞƫƕƚƦƮƤ 536–7 μƔƞƞƮƤ 690a μƔƟƦƘʎơƟ 1164 μƏƣƢƦƘƜƟ 779a μƏƦƔƜơƤ 565, 863, 888 μƏƦƚƟ 341 μƘƛƒƘƥƛƔƜ 197 μƐƞƘơƤ ƢƘƣƔƜƦƐƣƫ 947 μƘƞƔƖƩƔƒƦƚƤ 837–8 μƐƞƞƘƜƟ 952a2 μƘμƢƦƮƤ 446a (ƘǮμƒ), 446b μƘƦƔƒƦƜơƤ 1233 μƑƗƘƥƛƔƜ 973 μơʎƣƔ 849a μơƣƨƑ 699 μơʝƥƔ ƛƘƒƔ 640–3 μƧƘƞƮƤ 781, 781–2 ƟƔμƐƣƦƘƜƔ 173 ƟƔƯƞơƩơƤ 633a2 ƟƐμƘƜƟ 1238–9 ƟƐơƣƦơƤ 894 ƟƘƨƐƞƚ/Ɣ 831a, b ƟƯμƨƜƔ, ƦƏ 7b ƠƐƟơƤ 263 ƠƘƟơʝƥƛƔƜ 65 ƠƧƟƔƜƣƘʎƟ 882, 882–4a1 ƠƧƟƔƞƞƔƖƑ 845 ƠƧƟƐμƢơƣơƤ 318 ƠƧƟƚƖơƣƘʎƟ 814 ƠƧƟƒƥƦƔƥƛƔƜ 28 ǾƗƔƖμƮƤ 770a ơǮƝƘʎơƤ 757 ơǮƝƦƣƮƤ 243a ơǮƥƦƣɱƥƛƔƜ 653a ȂƝƟơƤ 7b, 181

265

266 ǾƞƐƛƣƜơƤ 845 ȂƞƞƧƥƛƔƜ 652, 1013a ǾƞơƮƤ 846a, b ǿμƔƒμƫƟ 1147 ȂμμƔ 203–4 ǾƟƑƥƜμơƤ 1014b ǾƟƜƟƏƟƔƜ 570a ǾƢưƣƔ 703a1, a2 ǾƣƖƔƒƟƘƜƟ 552 ȂƣƖƔƟơƟ 905–6, 905b1, b2 ȂƣƖƜƔ, ƦƏ 765–7 ǿƣƒƙƘƥƛƔƜ 237 ȂƦƞơƤ 7b, c ơȒƢƫ 852 ơȎƥƒƔ 911a, b ƢƏƖơƤ 634, 1191 ƢƔƒƘƜƟ 1086 ƢƔʎƤ 557 ƢƔƞƔƒƨƔƦơƤ 821a ƢƔƞƔμƟƔʎơƤ 1207 ƢƔƟƏμƘƣơƤ 660a1, a2 ƢƔƟƗƒƝƫƤ 611 ƢƔƣƔƕƔƒƟƘƜƟ 500 ƢƔƣƜƐƟƔƜ 939 ƢƔƣƒƥƦƔƥƛƔƜ 748 ƢƔƣƫƛƘʎƟ 358a, b ƢƔʝƞƔ 1255b ƢƐƗƚ 1057b ƢƘƜƛƔƣƩƘʎƟ 1177 ƢƘƜƣɱƥƛƔƜ 581 ƢƘƞƏƖƜơƤ 649 ƢƘƞƘƜƏƤ 171–2 ƢƐƢƫƟ 727 ƢƘƦƣƔʎơƤ 633b1 ƢƒƫƟ 766 ƢƞƏƠ 273 ƢƟƐƘƜƟ 1160 ƢơƜƝƒƞƞƘƜƟ 1121 ƢơƒƟƜμơƤ 808 ƢơƞƯƖƞƫƥƥơƤ 1168 ƢƮμƢƜμơƤ 872 ƢơƟƘʎƟ 70c, 680b ƢơƣƘƯƘƜƟ 560 ƢƮƥƜƤ 550–1, 550

Indices

ƢơƦƮƟ 13b ƢƣƏƝƦƫƣ 861 ƢƣơƘƠƘƨƒƘƥƛƔƜ 759 ƢƣơƝƑƗƘƥƛƔƜ 965 ƢƣơƝƚƣƔƒƟƘƜƟ 29a ƢƣƮμƔƩơƤ 856c, d ƢƣơƠƘƟƘʎƟ 725 ƢƣơƢƘƦƑƤ 701, 976a, b ƢƣƮƣƣƚƦơƤ 684a1, a2 ƢƣơƥƕƏƞƞƘƜƟ 580–1, 843 ƢƣƮƥƗƘƖμƔ 628 ƢƣƮƥƘƗƣơƤ 794a, b ƢƣơƥƑƖơƣơƤ 1093b1, b2 ƢƣơƥμƏƥƥƘƜƟ 1053 ƢƣơƥμƘƜƖƟƯƟƔƜ 821a, b1, b2 ƢƣơƥơμƜƞƘʎƟ ƢƘƒƣɯ 590–1 ƢƣơƥƦƑƝƘƥƛƔƜ 836–7 ƢƣƮƥƨƔƟƦơƤ 1159 ƢƣơƨƔƒƟƘƜƟ 849a ƢƧƣƖưƗƚƤ 273 ʜƔƕƗơƟơμƘʎƟ 515–6 ʜƒƢƦƘƜƟ (ǎƝƦƮƤ) 269a ʜơƨƘʎƟ 1055a ƥƔƨƚƟƑƤ 892b ƥƐƞƔƤ 607 ƥƘƯƘƥƛƔƜ 645 ƥʀμƔ 614 ƥƜƖƑƟ ƢƔƣƐƩƘƜƟ 1115 ƥƝƘƗƏƙƘƜƟ 988 ƥƝơƢƘʎƥƛƔƜ 1077 ƥƝƮƦơƤ 596b ƥƢɱƥƛƔƜ 786 ƥƢƜƞƏƤ 678a ƥƦƏƥƜƤ 1179a ƥƦƐƖƘƥƛƔƜ 596a ƥƦƐƖƚ 867 ƥƦƐƞƞƘƜƟ 612 ƥƦƐƣƖƘƜƟ 991 ƥƦƮƞơƤ 496, 562–3 ƥƦơƣƟƯƟƔƜ 902 ƥƦƣƐƨƘƜƟ 1134 ƥƦƧƖƘʎƥƛƔƜ 738 ƥƦƧƖƘƣƮƤ 1015

Verba de quibus scholia agunt

ƥƦƧƖƟƮƤ 1049 ƥƧƖƖƟƫμơƥƯƟƚ 1265 ƥƧƖƝƔƦơƜƝƦƒƙƘƥƛƔƜ 535 ƥƧμƢƣƏƦƦƘƜƟ 1177 ƥƧƟƘʎƟƔƜ 515–6 ƥƧƟƜƐƟƔƜ 868a ƥƨƏƞƞƘƥƛƔƜ 1113 ƥʫƙƘƥƛƔƜ 682b ƦƔƣƕƔƞƐơƤ 957 ƦƔƣƕƘʎƟ 723, 1179a ƦƔƧƣơƥƨƏƖơƤ 608 ƦƏƩƔ 185 ƦƘƝƟơʝƟ 308a ƦƘƞƘƮμƚƟơƤ 824–5 ƦƘƞƘƧƦƔʎơƤ 1149–50 ƦƘƞƘƧƦɱƟ 1252 ƦƘμƐƟƜơƤ 754 ƦƐƣμƔ 526b ƦƘƦƣƏơƣơƤ 508 ƦƞɱƟ 71 ƦƮƞμƚ 582b ƦƮƦƘ 151–2, 272 ƦƣƐƢƘƜƟ 1013b ƦƣƐƨƘƜƟ 117b1, b2 ȂƖƝơƟ 817a ƦƣơƢƔʎơƤ 303 ƦƯƣƔƟƟơƤ 217b2 ƦƧƨƞƮƤ 1104 ȏƕƣƜƥƦƑƤ 1096 ȏƢƘƒƣơƩơƤ 1096 ȏƢƘƝƦƣƐƢƘƜƟ 548–9b ȏƢƘƝƦƣƐƩƘƜƟ 167 ȏƢȰƣ 708 ȏƢƘƣƦƘƞƑƤ 36 ȏƢƘƣƩƞƒƘƜƟ 281a, b ȏƢƮ 931 ȏƢơƥƦƣƐƨƘƜƟ 218

ƨƏƥμƔ 509, 837 ƨƏƦƜƤ 693 ƨƛƘƒƣƘƜƟ 715 ƨƛƒƟƘƜƟ 548 ƨƛƮƟơƤ 250b ƨƒƞƫƤ 628 ƨƜƞƘʎƟ 548–9a, b ƨƞơƖƒƙƘƥƛƔƜ 95 ƨơƒƟƜơƤ 831a, b ƨơƜƦƏƤ 980 ƨƮƟơƤ 558b ƉƃƁƌƁ (subs. gen. pl.) 558a ƨƣƏƙƘƜƟ 526b, 1241 ƨƣƘƟơʝƟ 52 ƨƣƑƟ 217b1 ƨƣơƧƣƘʎƟ 915 ƨʝƟƔƜ 721 ǣƥƥƫƟ 489 ƨƯƦƫƣ 1031b ƨƫƟƘʎƥƛƔƜ 202 ƩƏƣƜƤ 179a ƩƔƣƦƮƤ 228 ƩƘƜƣơƢơƜƘʎƥƛƔƜ 891 ƩƘƜƣơƦƐƩƟƚƤ 1000 ƩƞƔʎƟƔ 539–40 ƩƞƫƣƮƤ 847b, 1055b ƩơƞơʝƟ 1036a1, a2 ƩƣʀƥƛƔƜ 905–6 ƩƣƧƥƔƞƏƝƔƦơƤ 637a1 ƩƣưƤ 765–7 ƪƔƯƘƜƟ 905–6, 1020b ƪƘƯƘƥƛƔƜ 712 ȞƗƒƟƘƜƟ 325 ȞƝƧƢƐƦƚƤ 1042 ȞμƮƨƣƫƟ 975 ȢƣƔ 56–7

267

Grammatica ƔǮƦƜƔƦƜƝƑ 836–7 ƾƢơƗƐƩƘƥƛƔƜ 1167a ƾƢơƗƜƗƮƟƔƜ 151 ƾƢơƝơƢƑ ƝƔƦȮ ƾƢơƝơƢƑƟ 129a ǂƣƛƣơƟ 856–9a2 ƾƣƥƘƟƜƝʬƤ ƞƐƖƘƜƟ 434–5a džƦƦƜƝƮƟ, džƦƦƜƝʬƤ 207–8c, 319, 455 Ɩƣ(ƏƨƘƦƔƜ) 7b, d, 105b, 434, 497a, 593, 602b ƖƣƏƨơƧƥƜƟ 791a2, 1167a ƗƔƥƐƫƤ 24 ƗƔƥƯƟƘƜƟ 144 ƗʀƞơƟ 839–40 ƗƜȮ ƗƜȮ Ʀơʝ ƥ 1159 ƗƜƔƨơƣƏ 550–1 ǏƟƜƝƮƤ 567 ǏƠʀƤ, ƦƮ 287, 479–80a, 647–9, 768, 882– 4a2 (subauditur) ǎƢƜƣƣƚμƔƦƜƝʬƤ 105a, 813 ƘȎƛƘʎƔ, ǟ 171–2 ǎƣưƦƚƥƜƤ ƝƔƦ’ ǎƣưƦƚƥƜƟ 390, 668, 876 ƛƐƞƘƜ ƘǮƢƘʎƟ 1058b ƝƔƛƮƞơƧ ǿ ƞƮƖơƤ 434–5a ƝơƜƟơʝ ƾƢȶ ƝơƜƟơʝ 444, 998, 1177 ƞƔμƕƏƟƘƜƟ ǎƢƒ ƦƜƟơƤ 856d ƞƘƒƢƘƜ 14, 97–8, 98–9, 661, 682a, 764, 1003b (subauditur), 1014a, 1021a, 1260, 1278a1, a2 ǟ ƗƜƏ 106–7b ǟ ȏƢƮ 267–8

ƞƮƖơƤ, ǿ 856–9a1 ƟơʝƤ, ǿ 13b, 56–7, 305, 503, 633a1, 860a, 953 ȃƞơƟ 26 ȂƟơμƔ 188c, 556a ƢƔƣƔƞƔμƕƏƟƘƜƟ 130–1 ƢƘƣƜƥƥȲ / ƢƘƣƜƦƦȲ ǟ ƾƢƮ 434 ǟ ƢƣƮƛƘƥƜƤ 1270 ƢƣȶƤ ƾƟƦȴ ƦʀƤ ȏƢƐƣ 150 ƢƣƮƛƘƥƜƤ 1270 ƢƣơƥƢơƜƘʎƥƛƔƜ 382b1 ƢƣơƥƦƔƝƦƜƝʬƤ 799 ƢƞƘơƟƏƙƘƜ ǟ ƝƔƦƏ 793 Ʀȶ ǒƦƜ 257 ƢƞƚƛƧƟƦƜƝʬƤ ƞƐƖƘƥƛƔƜ 510 ƥƧƟƏƢƦƘƜƟ 856d ƥƩƐƥƜƤ ǎƝ ƦƮƢơƧ 1010–1 ǎƟ ƦƮƢʪ 1010–1 ƦƜƛƐƟƔƜ Ʀ. ǎƨ’ ǏƔƧƦơʝ 1233 ƦơƢƜƝƮƤ 402a ȏƨ’ ǑƟ 353 Ʃ, ƦƮ 402a ƪƜƞơʝƥƜƟ 144 ƪƜƞʬƤ 24 etymologia 36, 58, 69, 188a, b, c, 550, 637a1, 638 syntaxis 112–4, 151, 856c, 836–7

Rhetorica ƾƟƦƜƗƜƔƥƦơƞƑ ƢƣȶƤ ƾƟƦƜƗƜƔƥƦơƞƑƟ 510–1 ƾƟƦƒƨƣƔƥƜƤ ƝƔƦȮ ƾƟƦƒƨƣƔƥƜƟ 117b2, 888 ƾƣƩȲƟ ƢơƜƘʎƥƛƔƜ 497b ƖƟƫμơƞơƖƘʎƟ 296 ƗƜƔƦƧƢơʝƥƛƔƜ 13a ƗƧƟƏμƘƜ 1163 ƘǴƗơƤ 170 ǎμƨƔƟƦƜƝƮƟ 846a ǎƟƔƟƦƒơƟ ƝƔƦȮ Ʀȶ ǎƟ. 783 ǎƢƏƖƘƜƟ 122–3a ǎƢƔƖƫƖƮƟ 628 ǎƢƒƦƔƥƜƤ 1124 ƝƔƦɸ ǎƢȵƦƔƥƜƟ 841b ǎƢƜƦƔƦƜƝƮƟ 188a, c ǎƢƜƨƐƣƘƜƟ 836–7

ƛƔƧμƔƥƦʬƤ 699 ƝƔƞʬƤ 404, 483, 510–1 ƝƔƜƟơƢƣƘƢƑƤ 750–2 ƝƔƦƔƩƣƚƥƦƜƝʬƤ 513 ƞƐƠƜƤ 483, 898 μƘƦƔƨơƣƏ 791a2 ƾƢȶ μƘƦƔƨơƣɱƤ 1183 ǎƝ μƘƦƔƨơƣɱƤ 203–4 ơǮƝƘʎơƤ 117b2 ƢƔƣơƜμƒƔ 1b ƢƘƣƜƨƣƔƥƦƜƝʬƤ 497c, 527, 574, 615, 848a, 856b, 883, 993, 1179b ƥƦơƩƏƙƘƥƛƔƜ 179b ƥƧƖƖƟưμƚ 483 ƥƧƟƜƐƟƔƜ 964 ƦƘƝμƔƒƣƘƥƛƔƜ 309 ƦƣơƢƜƝʬƤ 815, 827–8 ƨƣƏƥƜƤ ǟƗƘʎƔ 7d

Scaenica, ars tragica, histriones ƾƟƔƕơɱƟ 1081 ƾƟƔƟƘƯƘƜƟ 402b ƾƟƔƦƘƒƟƘƜƟ ƦȶƟ ǾƨƛƔƞμƮƟ 794a ƾƟƔƩƣơƟƜƥμƮƤ 1a ƾƢơƗƘƜƞƜɱƟ 404 ƾƢơƥƦƣƐƨƘƥƛƔƜ 1275 ƾƢƮƦƔƥƜƤ 1268 ƗƘƜƝƦƜƝʬƤ 305, 411a, 548, 1013c ƗƜƔƞƐƖƘƥƛƔƜ 531, 821a ƘǮƝƮƤ 402b ƘǮƝƮƦƫƤ 497b ǎƠƐƣƩƘƥƛƔƜ 531 ǎƢƜƝƔƞƘʎƥƛƔƜ 1031a ǯƝƘƦƘƯƘƜƟ 303 ǯƥƦơƣƒƔ ƾƨŪ ǯƥƦơƣƒƔƤ 512 ǟƗƘʎƔ 7d ƢƔƣ’ ǯƥƦơƣƒƔƟ 633b2

ƝƔƦƔƥƩơʝƥƔ ƦʀƤ ƩƘƜƣƮƤ 402b μƘƞƜƗƏƣƜơƟ 216 ƟƘƯƘƜƟ ƝƏƦƫ 402b ǾƣƩƘʎƥƛƔƜ 216, 217b2 ƢƔƣƔƛƔƣƣƯƟƘƜƟ 1259 ƢƔƣƮƟƦƘƤ 1107 ƢƘƣƜƘƥƦʬƦƘƤ 1079 ƢƣƮƥƫƢơƟ ƾƖƖƐƞơƧ 379a ƥƦƏƥƜμơƟ 216 ƩơƣƘƒƔ 217b1, 218 ƩơƣƮƤ 1275–8 etc Ɣǯ ƾƢȶ Ʀơʝ Ʃơƣơʝ 1275 personarum distributio 974, 983–4, 988, 1017, 1275–8, 1275