A wave-theoretic analysis of the angular distribution of the deuteron plus deuteron reaction products

311 88 3MB

English Pages 57

Report DMCA / Copyright

DOWNLOAD FILE

Polecaj historie

A wave-theoretic analysis of the angular distribution of the deuteron plus deuteron reaction products

Citation preview

A •AVSMfHiXtliSPIC ASAUtdXS m a v h m M s t m M s r o t e * r a a d + o iu sw tx o x P r o w e r s

3tttaltfc#& to fch# FiiOoltj o f 12%# Oraduat# School £m p a r t ia l f u l f i l lm e n t o f th « i^ulraasim t® f o r th e dogroo, D octor o f $h lloaop b y# in th e Dcpartmomt o f l i d l i c i O n iiro rcitj

tq f

F e l i x M* B o ld o v

S c p t w h o r 1949

ProQuest Number: 10295193

All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality o f this rep rod uction is d e p e n d e n t u p o n th e quality o f th e c o p y subm itted. In th e unlikely e v e n t th a t th e author did n ot sen d a c o m p le te m anuscript a n d th ere are missing p a g e s , th e s e will b e n o te d . Also, if m aterial h ad to b e r e m o v e d , a n o te will in d ica te th e d e le tio n .

uest ProQ uest 10295193 Published by ProQ uest LLC (2016). Copyright o f th e Dissertation is held by th e Author. All rights reserved. This work is p r o te c te d a g a in st unauthorized c o p y in g under Title 17, United States C o d e Microform Edition © ProQ uest LLC. ProQ uest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 - 1346

m m m

m &



x

a * ... fiMi, ajjtfj®-

4 •

3a- . Th® o r b i t a l in&uXar foment ft

9

4*

Tho & p p w m h - Q 'm m S m t i m n

X0



The M ffw ren tia X Gross &®otio&

23

6*

th e ThworcfclaisX A g u ia r D l^ti*ilm t;loa

33

7*

CojuparlsoM w ith ,^poriram t$

Mo 3p ln »

O rb it Coupling §♦

9#

C o ^ a r ls o M

w it h S p in -

o rblb Coupling

44

Conclusion®

40

BlBLIOCmPITf p io t

w it h i&porimarot*

33

& sS

49

1

In t rotiuc t io n Wk« tr«ft*mutial!i.on r e a c t io n # o f d e u « e i,a a a w it h tto u to r o n s

p red ttM »«ufci«oii* end p r o to n * In * b o u t « q a a l number# a c c o r d in g

tot rt* + tft- — 5, He,S +

'Ti. ■+ 3.2*( 1*1 )

+

tf ' + 3. 9 f A x ^ .

T h o se a r e t h e s i m p l e s t eaumpXee o f t h e m ore p r e v a l e n t t y p e of a u s 'le a r tr a n sm u ta tio n ® , th e «CN»e a i l e d fls u b s t i t u t l o n a l r e a c t io n s # '*

B e c a u se of i h c l r s i m p l i c i t y o n e o m h op # t o

a n a l y s e them more c l o s e l y than any o f t h e mtme'ron© r e a c t i o n s I n v o lv in g h e a v i e r n u c l e i # '

X) ~h D

P a r t l y f o r t h a t re a so n * t h e

r e a c tio n s have undergone more e x h a u stiv e ex p erim en ta l

I n v e s t i g a t i o n th a n m y o t h e r n u c le a r t ran sum t a t io n s # The e x p e r im e n ta l o b s e r v a t io n s p r e s e n t many jT eatu res w h ich h a v e n o t been' r e a d i l y i n t e r p r e t a b l e # th e s is i s

The p u r p o se o f t h i s

t o show t h a t , th ro u g h more th o r o u g h a n a l y s i s

th an h e r e t o f o r e a tte m p te d * a l l t h e f e a t u r e s ca n b# u n d er* s t o o d on t h e b a s i s o f v e r y g e n e r a l and w e ll-k n o w n p h y s i c a l la w s# The' c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f t h e

D f P

r e a c t i o n h a v e been,

s t u d ie d e x p e r im e n t a lly a® a f u n c t io n o f t h e d c u te r o n bombardment e n e r g y from

16 KW- t o

H o v e r t h e w id e r a n g e o f e n e r g ie s

4 M**r #

The f i r s t ty p e o f in f o r m a t io n

o b t a in e d I s t h e v a r i a t i o n w it h e n e r g y o f t h e y i e l d a s m easu red b y t h e c r o s s s e c t i o n d“ *

More d i r e c t l y am en able

t o t h e o r e t i c a l a n a ly s t a l a

t h e e o » o o i l e d fi l e a t r o p i c c r o s s

s e c t i o n * " ( r ' * Which a m b e d ed u c ed from t h e 4 1 r @ a t.lj n e a e u r e d e r e e e -a a e t l o a when t h e a n g u la r d i s t r i b u t i o n o f t h e p r o d u c ts i e 'wuemu

As t h e nemo i m p l i e s , i n t h e

I s o t r o p i c a m e® , a e a t I o n l a c o u n te d o n ly t h a t f r a c t i o n o f t h e p r o d u c t# w hich f o w e t h e l a o t r o p i o com ponent o f t h e a n g u la r d is tr ib u tio n *

x & te n a iv e m easu rem ent# o n t h e a n g u la r

d i s t r i b u t i o n h a v e b e e n made r e c e n t ly ^ Uhe e x p e r im e n ta l r e s u l t s a r e cn & lyaed i n term # o f t h e d i f f e r e n t i a l a r # M s e c t i o n w h ich m ea su res t h e number o f p a r t i a l # # e m it t e d i n t o a g iv e n s o l i d e n d # *

The

d i f f e r e n t i a l c r o s s s e c t i o n l a u s u a l l y w r i t t e n i n t h e f o xmt ^■A ^ +

-*

+ ... j-

( 1 ,2 )

in' K l a t h e l a o t r o p i o c r o s s s e c t i o n * A* B* C* •

are to e f ir s t *

s e c o n d , t h i r d • » • asym m etry c o e f f i c i e n t s

sa d ytx. 1# o o e i n e o f t h e a n g le t h e p r o d u c t p a r t i c l e m akes w ith d i r e c t i o n o f I n c id e n c e ,

i@oes> )*

The v a r i a t i o n w it h

e n e r g y o f cry * A* Bf G0 « •» l e g iv e n In F ig u r e S end &• The m eet s t r i k i n g f e a t u r e l a t o e b e h a v io r o f t h e f i r s t asym m etry c o e f f i c i e n t

d*

I t a t a r i # fro m m e m a il b u t

f i n i t e v a lu e -at t h e lo w m e r g i e a * r e a c h # # amajdattun a t a b o u t SOQ^feev* t h e n d e s c e n d # e n d f i n a l l y becom es n e g a t i v e a t a b o u t 1 * # b ee*

T h is t y p e o f b e h a v io r i s com m only f o m e d i n t h e a n g u la r d is t r i b u t i o n o f th e r e a c t io n p r o d u c ts o f h ea v y n u c le i* A r e s o n a n c e i n t e r a c t i o n * I n w h ic h an I n t e r n e d ! a t e compound n u c le u s 1# form ed* i s u s u a l l y p o s t u l a t e d i n o r d e r t o e x p la in , t h i s v a r i a t i o n *

However* i n t h i s oass,* t h e

c o m p a r a t iv e ly fe w p a r t i c l e s ( 4 ) w h ich w ould h a v e t o f o m t h e I n t e r m e d ia t e s t a t s m akes I t u n l i k e l y t h a t t h e e x p la n a ­ t i o n i s t o bo s o u g h t i n t h i s d i r e c t i o n *

l a a d d it io n *

t h e v a r ia t io n , o f t h e t o t a l c r o s s s e c t i o n w it h e n e r g y show s

m

s i g n o f a r e so n a n c e * In v ie w o f t h e f a c t t h a t a r e s o n a n c e phenomenon l a

im p ro b a b le* I t S s e a s r e a s o n a b le t o a tte m p t t o c o n s t r u c t a f i r s t o r d e r t h e o r y I n w h ich a d i r e c t i n t e r a c t i o n b e tw e e n t h e i n i t i a l and f i n a l s t a t e s i s

r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e r e a c t io n *

mod t h e p e n e t r a t i o n o f t h e p a r t i c l e s th r o u g h t h e Ooulosab and c e n t r i f u g a l b a r r i e r s I s r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e e n e r g y v a r i a t i o n o f t h e v a r io u s f a c t o r s fo u n d i n t h e d i f f e r e n t i a l 3

cr o ss s e c tio n * b e p r o p o s e t o e x p lo r e t h i s f i r s t o r d e r t h e o r y m ors C lo s e ly *

m

ap p ro a ch fro m t h e a c c e p t e d n u c l e a r f o r c e s

t h e o r y i s * h o w ev er* u n s a t i s f a c t o r y b e c a u s e - o f i t s u n s e t t l e d sta ts*

end we h o p e t o draw m ore .g e n e r a lly v a l i d c o n s u l* io n s

d i r e c t l y from t h e e x p e r im e n t * We w i l l show t h a t s u c h *-.is»r© g e n e r a l a p p ro a ch ca n In d e e d b e c a r r i e d o u t and t h a t th e e x p e r im e n t ml r e s u l t s e r e a d e q u a t e ly e x p la in e d * I* e « * w ith in ' to© l i m i t s o f e x p e r im e n ta l e r r o r * by t h i s f i r s t o r d e r th e o r y *

-

w it h b e a r in g o n t h e i n a c t i o n w h ich

s h o u ld b e aaa&lyted A# t h e e f f e c t o r t h e v a r i o u s p o s s i b l e •p in • r d m ta tia m s

t h o s e w it h w h ich t h e d e u te r o n a * c o l l i ­

s i o n t a b e s p l a c e , and t h o s e w h ic h may bo assumed. by th e p r o d u c ts * We f i r s t c o n s i d e r t h e i n i t i a l s t a t e , f a m e d by t h e c o l l i s i o n o f two d e u tc r c m s*

Lv&ch o f t h e p a r t i c l e s fam

a u n i t s p i n , and s o t h e v e c t o r m od el lo a d s I m m e d ia te ly t o r e s u l t a n t s p in a o f 0 , 1 , o r 2 u n i t s h o v ln 0 a a I n d i c t , t r i p l e t , o r q u in te t o f p o s s ib le o r ie n ta t io n s r e s p e c tiv e ly #

%h® I n c id e n t beam i s u apoX ari& ad, l # e # , t h e s p i n s a r e I n d e p e n d e n tly and random ly o r i e n t e d I n © pace; t h e r e f o r e th e s p in s t a t e s a r c a s t a t i s t i c a l m ix tu r e w it h e q u a l p r o b a b i l i t i e s o f s t a t e s w it h d e f i n i t e p r o j e c t i o n s o f two u n c o u p le d s p in s a lo n g an a x i s end w ith o u t c o r r e l a t i o n o f t h e s p i n s t a t e s o f t h e I n d i v id u a l p a r t i c l e s *

B r e it

and B a r lin g ^ h a v e 'shown t h a t t h e ab ove s t a t i s t i c a l m ix tu r e i s e q u iv a le n t t o m s t a t i s t i c a l m ix tu r e o f s t a t e s c o r r e sp o n d * l a g t o compounded s p i n s w it h d e f i n i t e p r o j e c t i o n s a lo n g t h e sam e a x is *

The s t a t e f u n c t i o n s r e p r e s e n t in g t h e s e

n i n e c o u p le d s t a t e s w i l l now b e c o n s t r u c t e d * A S i n g l e d e t it e r o n 's s p i n s t m t # i s u l i n e a r c o m b in a tio n o f th e' f o l l o w i n g s p in f u n c t io n s #

w h ere

t*' arid

. ^wpW d h * u s u a l P a u li s p in f u n c t i o n s , and t h e

s u b s c r i p t s 1 m&.:# r e f e r t o t h e n e u tr o n 1 end p r o t o n 2 , r e s p e c tiv e ly *

f e g e t t h e n i n e s p i n .f u n c t io n s o f two

deufcerone we t a b # t h e p r o d u c t o f t h e s e t h r e e © pin f u n c t i o n s w it h c o r r e s p o n d in g o n e s f o r n e u t r o n 5 end p r o to n 4#

fa J

°0 *t **