Oedipus Lex [Reprint 2020 ed.]
 9780520332935

Citation preview

Oedipus Lex

Philosophy, Social Theory, and the Rule of Law General Editors Andrew Arato, Seyla Benhabib, Ferenc Feher, William Forbath, Agnes Heller, ArthurJacobson, and Michel Rosenfeld 1. William Rehg, Insight and Solidarity: A Study in the Discourse Ethics of Jürgen Habermas 2. Alan Brudner, The Unity of the Common Law: Studies in Hegelian Jurisprudence 3. Peter Goodrich, Oedipus Lex: Psychoanalysis, History, Law

Oedipus Lex Psychoanalysis, History, Law

Peter Goodrich

UNIVERSITY O F C A L I F O R N I A PRESS Berkeley Los Angeles London

University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles, California University of California Press London, England Copyright © 1995 by The Regents of the University of California Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publi cation Data Goodrich, Peter, 1954Oedipus lex: psychoanalysis, history, law / Peter Goodrich. p. cm. — (Philosophy, social theory, and the rule of law) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-520-08990-1 (alk. paper) 1. Law—Psychology—History. 2. Jurisprudence—Psychological aspects—History. 3. Lawyers—Psychology—History. I. Tide. II. Series. K487.P75G66 1995 34o'.oi'g—dc20 95-10026 CIP Printed in the United States of America ! 2 3 4 5

6

7

8

9

The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984©

CONTENTS

PREFACE

ix

1. INTRODUCTION: MELANCHOLIA JURIDICA 2. HISTORY BECOMES THE LAW: MOURNING, GENEALOGY, AND LEGAL HISTORIOGRAPHY

1 16

History as Cure

17

Genealogy

22

Image and Unconscious

30

Rewriting Law

36

3. APOLOGY AND ANTIRRHETIC: ICON, IDOL, IMAGE, AND THE FORMS OF LAW

41

Apologia, Antirrhesis, and the Foundations of Law

45

Image, Icon, and Idol

56

Captives of the Soul

63

4. LAW AGAINST IMAGES: ANTIRRHETIC AND POLEMIC IN COMMON LAW Law and Dissimulation

68 71

v

vi

CONTENTS

Denunciations

77

Antitheton: Strangers, Foreigners, Nomads, and Others

81

Paradoxon: Public Laws and Private Reasons

89

Aporia: Contingency and the Government of Women

95

Conclusion: Penitus Amputare, Inner Incisions

101

5. HAEC IMAGO: THIS MASK, THIS MAN, THIS LAW

108

Sources of Law and Statuses of Women in the Ancient Constitution

114

Of Fate, Fortune, Justice, and Other Illustrious Women

121

Yconomia and Domestic Subjection

130

Virtue and Excess

138

6. GYNAETOPIA: FEMININE GENEALOGIES O F C O M M O N LAW

144

Janus, or the Backface of Common Law

152

Woemen's Law

159

Gynaetopia, or the Legal Place of the Feminine

168

Conclusion: The Jurisprudence of Difference

173

7. OEDIPUS LEX: INTERPRETATION AND THE U N C O N S C I O U S OF LAW

181

Antonomasia: Psychiatric Harm and the Englishman's H o m e

189

Allegoria, or the Erased Face of the Offeree

198

Synecdoche: Egyptians, Aliens, Others, and the Crown

210

Envoi

220

CONTENTS

vii

8. CONCLUSION: A LEGALITY OF THE CONTINGENT

223

T h e Man W h o Mistook the Law for a Hat

225

Ghostly Powers

228

An English Unconscious

234

Critical Legal Studies, or /us Interruptus

240

BIBLIOGRAPHY

249

INDEX

271

PREFACE

T h e most ancient of the Western mythologies of the foundation of law, that of the decalogue, tells the story of an order of legal writing established against the disorder of images. The writing and rewriting of the law took place around the destruction of an idol. The idol in question, the golden calf or Osiris, has been variously interpreted as representing Egypt, plurality, or feminine deities and cults of creativity. The foundational story of the writing of law is predicated upon destroying or outlawing idols, the images of other laws, of different forms of representation and of gender. The story of foundation establishes an iconic order of legality as writing, speech, or text whose letters or literae will banish both the use and the meaning of images and the other idols or figures of thought. This study will pursue this narrative or trauma of social foundation primarily through the example of early modern discourses of foundation of common law. It will be argued that the inaugural doctrinal discourses or treatises of common law inherit or replicate the structures of classical Western patristic writings and their theological and latterly secular narratives of legality. The common law too can be studied in terms of an originary trauma or misrecognition of identity. The Anglican legal tradition was born of the Reformation and of the new form of letters, the printed text. In doctrinal terms it developed initially as an aspect of the protest against images and established itself through discourses against the distraction of images and the idols of the mind. It built its doctrine and identity against the ornaments of Rome and the sophistries of the Continentals. It also wrote itself against women, the living images which threatened to confuse the spirit or truth of law through mere appearance and "carnal pretence." The following study will thus interpret the foundation of common law ix

PREFACE

primarily through a historical analysis of Renaissance and Reformation debates on the history, uses, and laws governing images. In that respect it offers an analysis of those foundational debates within ecclesiastical and secular law that first spelled out the terms of the modern governance of perception, the direction of thought through control of the visual, the figures of law both internal and external to its subjects and its texts. The argument builds upon the historical enfolding of spiritual and temporal discourses concerned with the governance of the soul, with spiritual laws variously directed at idolatry and iconoclasm, image and figure, statue and law. The development of secular doctrines concerned with governance of text, interpretation and ethos in the reformed age of print established both the form and the meaning of law. The analysis thus suggests both a displacement and an incorporation of one law in the other: the secular law inherited or otherwise annexed or absorbed the earlier powers, techniques, and jurisdictions of the spiritual law and its "Courts of Conscience." The laws against images became protocols of reading or hermeneutic rules prohibiting images, figures or, in strict terms, harlots, "loose women," "the whore of Babel" in the lawful text. The argument uses history as a means of thinking the terms of a critical jurisprudence and may be addressed synoptically: the regulation of the visible was always in essence a determination of the licit forms and the proper references to the invisible or unseen. The regulation of exterior images was directed at control of interior images, mental idols, or unseen signs. In short, the visible was "a spectacle of things invisible," and the governance of visibility was in consequence a direction of things heard, remembered, desired, or imagined as the customs or precedents of common law. The discourses against rhetoric, against images, and against women that this work traces and expounds are discourses of the foundation of law in the definition and capture of subjectivity. They spell out the laws or constraints of thought in the inaugural discourses of social being and its constitutive texts. It remains to be added that while law is always a governance of thought and so can perhaps be most radically rethought as such, it also constitutes itself upon an unthought—upon custom, repetition, and repression. Law, for Aristotle, was "wisdom without desire." In a literal sense that reference could be taken as meaning that law is a truth that represses desire, a text that negates its images and denies the figurations or fluidity of its texts. In a sense which will to many seem extreme, the analysis also suggests a logic of the supplement or return of the repressed. In this aspect this work seeks to represent some of the more obscure texts of the tradition, some of the forgotten themes and works of early legal doctrine, the other faces or "other scenes" of the institution. The critical analytic suggestion embodied in this text thus concerns a politics of recupera-

PREFACE

xi

tion, of recovery of the traumas that law cannot consider, of recollection of the repressed and failed images, figures, texts, and thoughts prohibited by the prose of doctrine, by the language of judgment, by the protocols of a wisdom without desire. Some time after imagining the title Oedipus Lex, I was alerted to the existence of another use of the neologism in a jurisprudential context by the Canadian jurist Professor J. C. Smith in a book titled The Psychoanalytic Roots of Patriarchy: The Neurotic Foundations of Social Order (New York: New York University Press, 1990). My use of the term is, I believe, sufficiently incidental and certainly adequately displaced to excuse the unconscious borrowing. The signifier floats. So too I should apologize for my neologism "gynaetopia." It should, of course, be the phonetically more complex genitive, "gynaecotopia." I have simply preferred the bastard form. So also, for reasons that are self-evident, ins interruptus is preferred to the grammatical ius interruptum. My thanks to the usual causes, women, men, and institutions. The British Academy, the Nuffield Foundation, and Birkbeck College all provided small research grants which gready facilitated comparative and archival research. My thanks to those at Cardozo Law School, New York, who collectively tolerated my presence and sharpened my thought over a semester as visiting professor. Arthur Jacobson, David Carlson, Chuck Yablon, Marty Slaughter, Michel Rosenfeld, Jeanne Schroeder, and Richard Weisberg all politely and perspicuously challenged my cultural prejudices and my theoretical preconceptions. I hope to repeat the experience. At Lancaster University my thanks to my colleagues in opposition, to Peter Rush, Alison Young, Les Moran, and Piyel Haldar for their extremism and their scholarship. My disparate thanks to Renata Salecl, Peter Fitzpatrick, Neil Duxbury, Matthew Weait, and Tim Murphy, all of whom were at times either sufficiently direct or simply rude enough to say what they thought. For their peripatetic style of scholarship, for their voice, and for their imagination, my thanks to Tony Carty, Patrick Durkin, Linda Mills, Ronnie Warrington, David Walliker, and Costas Douzinas. For glimpses of an authentic augury of thought and for lessons in the sorcery of history and of writing, my thanks to Yifat Hachamovitch and to the birds.

T H E

Reverie or Back-face mm JANUS. OF

T H E

T O-W I T ,

All that is met with in

STORY

Concerning the

C O M MON A N D

STATUTE-LAW Cngltfl) ¿¿ttatuip. O F

From the firft

MEMOIRS

of the two

to the Deceaie of King HENG^ Y II. fet down and tackt together fuccin&ly by way of Narrative.

NATIONS,

Deiigned, Devoted and Dedicated to the moil Illuftrious the E A R L of S AL1S 5 6 - 6 4 . i ° 8 114. 157-158- 223-225, 242-244; defined, 57-58; ecclesiastical, ix-x, 20-21, 5 1 - 5 4 ; legal, 8, 1 4 - 1 5 , 22, 33-34, 37, 99' 235-237; and memory, 16-18, 25, 58-59; and postmodernity, 56, 61; textual, 63-65, 91-93, 182-185, 210; real, 25-26, 58, 109, 112, 130, 133; temporal, 99-100, 133-136; Veritas falsa, 34, 59, 60; and women, x, 20, 22, 37, 45, 57, 62, 96-98, 100-103, ' ° 8 , 128, 133-136, 141-142, 157, 224; and word, 66, 1 8 1 189, 220-221 Image-service, 11-12, 44, 58-59, 65, 158 Imago, 24, 90, 109-110, 1 3 0 - 1 3 1 , 196, 220 Imago Dei, 128 Immemorial, 76, 79-80, 1 1 8 - 1 2 2 , 129, 149-150, 196-197

Injustice, 1-3, 180 Inns of Court, 86-87, !4 2 > 145-146 Institutions, 25, 30, 38-40, 48, 50, 69, 8994, 105-107, 122, 148-152, 177, 210, 240-245

Irigaray, Luce, 37, 138-139, 150-152, 177-180, 240-242 Isidore of Seville, 125 Ins imaginum, 33, 109—110, 224

Jacobson, Arthur, 224 Jani Angloram, 36, 147, 1 5 2 - 1 5 9 Janus, 1 0 - 1 1 , 3 6 - 3 7 , 8 1 , 125, 139, 147, 152-162, 237

Jardine, Alice, 139 Jewel, John, 27, 45-46, 48, 54-56, 64, 8384, 113. 2 35- 239 Jezebel, 100, 160 Johnson, Samuel, 113 Judgment, 1,93, 100, 106, 1 1 3 - 1 1 4 , 124125, 138, 168, 188, 194-196, 204, 237

Jung, Carl, 196 Jurisdictions, 28, 39, 44, 64, 69-71, 88-89, 1 1 4 - 1 1 5 , 120-124, 179-180, 221-227,

235-239 Jurisprudence, 7-8, 11-15, 28, 36-38, 42-

275

44, 105-107, 139-140, 176-179, 183188, 240-247 Justice, 123-128, 130-131, 144, 1 5 5 - 1 5 7 , 1 6 9 - 1 7 1 , 174, 225-230, 235; and femininity, 124-128, 146, 155-158, 169, 170-171; as judge, 124 Justinian, 23, 90, 110, 204-205

Kafka, Franz, 34, 131 Kantorowicz, Ernst, 174 Kantorowicz, Herman, 244-247 Kelley, Donald, 148 Kelly, Joan, 119-120, 146 Knox, John, 82, 99-100, 114, 160 Kofman, Sarah, 137 Kramer, Matthew, 106 Kristeva, Julia, 151, 155, 178, 211 Lacan,Jacques, 30, 131, 183-185, 221, 242, 246 Lactantius, 57, 103 Ladies Calling, 16-17, 3 2 , 36, 125 Ladner, G., 112 Lambard, William, 9, 81 Lamy, Bernard, 73, 77, 188-190 Laplanche, Jean, 20 Latria, 44, 101-102, 225, 228 Law: and chastity, 2, 12, 62-64, 116, 133134; civil, 77, 83, 100-103, 109-110, 114-120, 124-130, 172; ecclesiastical, 4 5 - 4 8 , 5 1 - 5 2 , 1 1 0 - 1 1 6 , l s i , 128-130, 133, 174, 205-208, 224-226, 245-247; and education, 2-5, 92, 105-106, 135, 224, 244; and emotion, 15, 31-33, 3639- 1 4 5 - 1 4 6 , 177. 181-185, 235-239; and experience, 174-176; and identity, 81, 85-89, 92, 150-152, 172, 179-180, 232-236, 243; interior, 132, 228-230, 235-238, 244; and justice, 123-127, 170-172, 229-230, 237-240; and language, 5-6, 75-76, 81-83, 85, 93, 103, 172; and lust, 3, 51, 61-62, 121, 134, 171; and memory, 2, 22, 38-40, 86, 125, 174; and politics, 5, 28, 150-153, 1 7 6 180, 225-247; and relationship, 7, 14, 183-185, 191-193, 238-240; and scholarship, 1-4, 85, 149-150, 242-247; and the soul, 3, 5, 18, 19, 31-33, 62-63, 98; of thought, 45, 90-93, 97-98, 114, 130, ! 3 3 - i 3 5 . 220-221

276

INDEX

Larves Resolutions, a i , 24, 1 3 5 - 1 3 7 , 147, 164-173 Lawyers, 4-6, 32, 43, 74-75, 145-146 Legendre, Pierre, 11, 24, 29, 31, 34, 45, 69, 79, 89, 1 0 9 - 1 1 1 , 183-188, 197, 235, 243, 246 Leges terme, 76, 174, 2 1 3 Legh, Gerard, 74 Lesbia régula, 172 Leslie,John, 1 1 6 - 1 1 7 , 153> 154> 1 6 0 - 1 6 1 , 229 Letters, 202-210, 2 1 4 - 2 1 6 Lever, Ralph, 74, 104 Lévinas, Emmanuel, 170 Libraries, 7 Lineage, 46-48, 52, 55, 76, 79, 81-83, 87> 94-95, 105, 109-110, 196; male, 1 1 4 130 Littleton, Sir Thomas, 4, 35-36, 93 Llewellyn, Karl, 200 Lloyd, Lodowick, 156, 174 Longue durée, 25-27, 45, 104, 1 5 1 , 239240 Love, 14, 3 1 - 3 2 , 36, 124, 177, 1 9 1 , 194197. 243. 2 4 6 Lust, i8, 98 Lycurgus, 84

Miracles, 97 Mondzain-Baudinet, MJ., 54 Monstrosity, 49-50, 54, 97, 100 More, Sir Thomas, 41, 93, 230-233 Mother, 89, 102-103, 1 1 2 , 1 1 7 , 1 1 8 , 1 2 2 124, 178-179 Mourning, 7, 1 1 - 1 7 , 19. 27-29, 32-34, 39, 94, 172, 221-223; and femininity, 16-19, 28; and history, 1 6 - 1 7 , 20-22, 25-27, 38-40 Munday, Anthony, 72 Murphy, Tim, 191 Music, 91 Myth, 28, 89,94, 105, 149-150, 1 5 4 - 1 5 6 Names, 109-110, 1 2 5 - 1 2 6 Natural law, 80-86, 1 0 0 - 1 0 1 , 1 1 6 - 1 1 7 , 1 2 2 ~ 125, 153, 156, 174 Negligence, 189-198 Nemesis complex, 198 Nicephorus, 51-54 Nietzsche, Friedrich, 39, 104 Nihilation, 60-61, 1 3 3 - 1 3 4 , 224 Nihilism, 52-56, 60-61, 72, 94, 99-100, 106-107, 133» 224 North, Sir Roger, 4 Noy, William, 84, 175 Nursing father, 6, 1 4 - 1 7 , 88-89, 2 4 ° Nusbaum, Arthur, 201

Maclean, Ian, 3 1 - 3 2 , 1 1 4 - 1 1 5 , 156, 170 Magna Carta, 195 Maravall.J. A., 1 3 1 Marin, Louis, 108, 1 1 0 , 111 Marriage, 90—92, 120, 1 3 3 - 1 3 5 , 140, 162, 165, 204-208 Martiall,John, 58, 59 Martian law, 1 5 5 - 1 5 6 Masks, 1 0 8 - 1 1 0 , 1 3 1 , 170 Maxims, 84, 103, 1 6 1 , 175 Melancholy, 4,6, 16-22, 88, 98, 193-195; and law, 2, 4, 86-89, 1 9 3 - 1 9 4 Memory, 3, 16-19, 36-38, 40, 58, 86, 1 2 5 127, 169, 210, 215, 226-227, 232-233; and law, 1-3, 1 7 - 1 8 , 32-34, 39, 82, 125, 182-186, 215; and justice, 124-126 Ménage, Gilles, 153 Mental space, 133-137 Metaphor, 136-138, 155, 172, 185-187,

Oeconomic, 1 3 2 - 1 3 3 , 142-143, 159-162, 197,238-239 Oedipus, 7-8, 83, 94 Ong, Walter, 103 Onirocritica, 26, 29, 33, 182-189, J 9 i Oratory, 43-45, 102-106, 188-189 Ordeal, 188 Origins, 26-28, 46-48, 76-77, 81-83, 939 5 . 9 9 - i ° ° . i°9> 1 2 3 - 1 2 4 , 1 4 9 - 1 5 1 Osiris, ix Other, 17, 20-24, 32-38, 78-99, 106, 1 5 1 , 186 Other face, 148, 157, 237-239 Other scene, 9, 12, 27, 3 1 - 3 3 , 1 0 1 - 1 0 3 , 106, 186-188, 197, 204, 209, 220, 240244 Outlawry, 95

190-191 Milner, Jean-Claude, 27 Mimesis, 56-61, 63, 83-84, 90 Minkkinen, Panu, 212

Painted words, 11, 44, 5 1 , 55, 59, 63, 70, 92, 103, 1 1 4 Painting, 102-103, 108-109, 1 1 3 - 1 1 4

INDEX Paranologia, 75 Parker, Robert, 47, 53-54, 55, 58, 60, 6 2 63. 96-97. 10a, 174, 233, 236 Pateman, Carole, 207 Patria, 48, 109, 1 1 1 , 188 Patria potestas, 83, 90, 140, 208-210, 235, 239 Peacham, Henry, 48, 49, 92-93, 1 9 2 - 1 9 3 , 213 Pecheux, Michel, 1 5 1 Perkins, John, 140 Perkins, William, 60, 65, 66, 97-100, 132, 135-136. l63- 238 Persona, 129, 140, 157, 1 5 9 - 1 6 0 , 166, 168, 172, 178, 184, 209, 2 1 6 - 2 2 0 Persuasion, 1 0 6 - 1 0 7 , 136, 1 8 2 - 1 8 9 Pettyfoggers, 128, 132, 140, 2 1 0 - 2 1 1 Phayr, T., 203 Philology, 173, 181, 184 Phronesis, 124, 147 Pisan, Christine de, 1 1 9 , 169, 170, 177 Place, 8-9 Placentinus, 244-247 Plato, 43-44, 72, 183 Plurality, 12, 22, 27, 61, 105, 1 1 2 , 123, 126, 138, 1 4 2 - 1 4 3 , 150, 224, 235-237; and gynocracy, 1 4 7 - 1 5 2 , 178-180; and polity, 27, 105, 123, 220, 237-239 Plutarch, 113 Pocock.J. G. A., 27, 147 Poetics, 15, 19, 28, 36-38, 148, 156, 173, 208-209, 241-246 Polemic, 44, 68-75, 1 0 5 - 1 1 0 , 1 4 6 - 1 5 0 , 153, 188-189, 2 2 0 - 2 2 1 , 244-245 Pollution, 62 Polybius, 49 Polyhimnia, 169 Portrait, 59, 1 1 0 - 1 1 1 , 1 4 3 , 2 2 6 - 2 2 7 Postal rule, 182, 1 9 5 - 2 1 0 Post-glossators, 1 - 2 , 33, 1 1 6 Postmodernity, 56 Powell, Thomas, 73 Poynet,John, 231 Precedent, 128, 1 4 9 - 1 5 0 , 154, 165, 1 7 1 , 174, 1 9 1 - 1 9 5 , 201-203, 2 1 0 Presence, 8, 10, 81, 9 1 - 9 3 , 103, 108, 130, 139, 205, 220, 226, 228-233 Prest, William, 142, 145 Print, 55, 63, 65, 1 0 2 - 1 0 4 , 164, 1 8 1 - 1 8 2 Pro lectione pictura est, 102, 1 1 3 Prototypes, 58, 63, 1 0 9 - 1 1 0 , 130, 226-227

277

Providence, 1 2 3 - 1 2 4 , 237-238 Pseudologia, 55, 67 Psychiatric harm, 182, 189-198 Psychoanalysis, 11, 1 3 - 1 5 , 18-20, 27-30, 33-36, 2 2 1 - 2 2 2 ; and law, 7 - 1 0 , 19-22, 29, 126, 1 4 7 - 1 5 2 , 180-189, 243-246; and rhetoric, 1 8 1 - 1 8 9 , 1 9 2 - 1 9 6 Public sphere, 1 1 0 - 1 1 2 , 1 1 6 - 1 2 0 , 1 3 4 - 1 3 7 , 159 Putrefaction, 23 Puttenham, George, 72, 74, 75, 77, 1 8 5 186, 193 Querelle des femmes, 100-104, 1 1 7 - 1 2 2 , 126, 128, 140, 144-150, 155, 168 Ramus, Petrus, 1 0 3 - 1 0 4 , 183 Rastall, William, 2 1 2 - 2 1 3 Rastell, John, 140 Ratio iuris, 113-114 Reason, 90-96, 1 0 5 - 1 0 7 , 1 1 0 - 1 1 1 , 1 1 3 - 1 1 4 , 1 3 4 - 1 3 6 , 153; and criticism, 149, 153; and emotion, 187-188; and feminine, 1 5 2 - 1 5 6 ; public, 90-92, 1 0 5 106, 1 1 0 , 1 3 0 - 1 3 3 , 158, 235-236; private, 90-92, 130, 135, 209, 238-239 Reform, 59-60, 64-66, 82, 96-98, 102, 1 1 9 Reformation, 10, 1 1 , 19, 42, 44, 48, 97, 1 0 1 , 119, 181, 212 Regia, potestas, 83-85, 89-90, 1 1 1 , 209, 2 3 9 240 Renaissance, 10, 11, 2 1 , 32, 39-40, 55, 80, 106, 1 1 4 , 1 1 6 , 1 1 9 - 1 2 0 Repetition, 10, 24-26, 3 0 - 3 1 , 34, 39-40, 201-203 Repression, 1 2 - 1 3 , 26, 29, 3 1 - 3 4 , 38, 45, 98-107, 1 4 7 - 1 5 2 , 184-186, 202, 209, 221 Reproduction, 105, 107, 122, 1 3 1 - 1 3 3 , 149-150 Rhetoric, 1 1 , 1 3 , 27-29, 43-45, 5 1 - 5 6 . 6 5 . 7 1 - 7 5 , 82, 103, 136, 210; forensic, 104, 1 8 1 - 1 8 9 , 2 1 0 ; and painting, 103, 1 8 1 182 Ridley, Sir Thomas, 162 Riley, Denise, 175 Rogers, D„ 133, 1 3 4 Rose, Gillian, 39, 105 Ruin, 37, 39 Rush, Peter, 184

278

INDEX

Sacrament, 58 Sacrifice, 95, 132, 137, 153, 214, 2 1 7 Sacrilege, 52-53, 96, 1 1 9 , 196, 224 Saint Augustine, 129 Saint German, 46, 69, 172, 230-233, 235236 Salic law, 1 1 6 - 1 1 9 , 122, 152, 156-157, 176 Salisbury, Joyce, 137 Samothes, 81 Sander, N„ 44, 47, 59, 61, 66, 224, 233 Saturn, 1, 18, 81, 154 Schroeder, Jeanne, 1 5 1 , 175 Scot, Reginald, 98 Scripture, 102-103, 1 1 3 - 1 1 4 Sedition, 86, 93 Seduction, 106-107, 1 3 6 - 1 3 7 , 140, 1 8 5 189 Seiden, John, 27, 36-37, 47, 54, 61, 67, 76, 81, 91, 109, 1 4 7 - 1 5 5 , 170, 237 Semiotics, 45, 104, 202-203, 205-208 Semiramis, 128 Senault, J-F., 187 Senescence, 20, 54 Senses, 97-99 Setton, Kenneth, 1 1 0 Shamefacedness, 137, 1 7 0 - 1 7 2 Sherry, Richard, 75 Shofie-grotte, 3 Sign, 42, 57-59, 74-75. 1 0 1 - 1 0 2 , 108-110, 138-139, 188-189, 236; and enigma, 138; and shadows, 113, 236-238; in Signum subjectionis, 1 0 9 , 1 3 4 - 1 3 8 , 208,

235 Silence, 43, 106, 1 3 5 - 1 3 6 , 146, 216, 220 Simpson, A. W. B., 205 Simulation, 9, 23, 48, 57, 103, 123—124, 202, 227-228 Slips, 33 Sloterdijk, Peter, 20, 68 Smith,John, 185-186, 192-193 Smith, SirThomas, 76, 79, 91, 1 0 1 , 133, 140, 197 Smyth, John, 64 Sorcery, 53, 54, 62-63 Soul, 18, 19, 28, 3 1 , 40-42, 52, 58, 59, 6264, 70-73, 89, 98, 1 0 1 - 1 0 3 , 226-227; and passions, 181-185, 235> a n d sex, 124-127, 1 3 1 , 158, 177 Sources, 10, 36-37, 46-48, 79-81, 94, 105, 130, 149-152, 173, 220, 227-228 Sowernam, Ester, 146-147

Sparta, 84

Speculapastoralis, 64, 233

Spelman, Sir Henry, 28, 52-53, 81, 84, 96, 1 1 9 , 172 Spousals, 205-207 Stang-Dahl, Tove, 164 Stapleton, Thomas, 19, 27, 47, 55, 58, 233 Statue, 1 1 0 Stein, Peter, 205 Stillingfleet, Edward, 35, 60, 63, 69-70, 225-230, 232, 236 Stranger, 87-90, 99-102, 1 1 6 , 1 2 1 , 1 5 1 , 2 1 1 Subject (legal), 69-71, 88-89, 94' 110 > 1 3 1 _ 133- 235.241-244 Subjection, 1 3 2 - 1 3 4 , 1 3 7 - 1 3 8 , 235-239, 241-242; ethical, 237 Supremacy, 83, 234 Swetnam.J. 146-147 Swinburne, Henry, 1 2 1 , 162, 164, 205-207 Symbols, 1 0 1 - 1 0 2 , 126, 204-208, 216-220, 226-228 Symptom, 25-28, 33, 45, 1 0 1 - 1 0 3 , 147, 182-188, 207-208, 220-222

Synderesis, 172, 231

Synecdoche, 213-218 Tacitus, 43-44, 72, 1 1 8 , 156 Tears, 18, 19, 45, 65, 138-139, 188 Tertullian, 47, 48, 50, 56-58, 61, 97, 1 3 7 138 Text, 8-10, 13, 22, 24, 32, 89, 102-103, 1 1 4 , 135, 173, 179, 189, 2 1 7 - 2 1 8 , 244; and image, 65-67, 102, 135, 173, 1 8 1 183, 226-230, 236-238; and ratio iuris, 1 1 3 - 1 1 4 , 225, 235, 244-247 Thomas, Yan, 111, 115 Tradition, 30-32, 45-47, 52-54, 79-84, 96-99, 102-104, 165, 172, 195-196, 225-226; repressed, 147-156, 169-170, 235 Treatise, 105-107, 225-226 Tropes, 182-189, 2 1 0 passim Truth, 65-67,91-94, 103, 105, 1 1 0 - 1 1 2 , 124, 126, 1 3 7 - 1 3 8 , 225, 235 T\ivil, Daniel, 187-188 "IVvelve Tables, 171 Tyndale, William, 11 Ulpian, 1 1 5 Uncleanness, 53, 62, 95-96, 134 Unconscious, 7, 20-29, 33> 5 2 , 58, 64,

INDEX 104-106, 1 5 1 , 206-208; collective, 5, 1 4 - 1 5 , 29, 33-34, 1 0 4 - 1 0 5 , 1 4 7 - 1 5 4 , 189; legal, 8, 10, 25-27, 5 6 , 1 0 5 - 1 0 7 , 1 4 8 - 1 5 2 , 1 8 1 - 1 8 9 , 194-196, 207, 220, 234-239 Unhappy consciousness, 29 Universalia, 147, 174 Ut pictmra poesis, 63, 1 1 3 Utrumque ins, x, 45-48, 63, 69-70, 82-84, 90, 1 1 4 - 1 1 6 , 132, 179, 224-228, 2 3 0 236, 246-247 Vagabonds, 87, 2 1 2 Vanities, 5 1 , 57, 6 1 - 6 3 , 82-83, 88, 96, 1 4 1 142 Veil, 57, 100, 108, 128, 137, 1 7 0 - 1 7 1 , 241 Venus, 3, 57, 158 Verajudicia, 31 Verstegan, Richard (pseud.), 82 Vestiges, 1 2 5 - 1 2 6 , 130, 203, 234-238 Vickers, Brian, 71, 186 Vico, 44 Violence, 68-70, 2 1 7 , 220-222 Virgins, 57, 108 Virtue, 1 5 7 - 1 5 9 , 1 7 0 - 1 7 1 , 235-237, 244 Vision, 4 1 - 4 2 , 48-50, 53, 56, 97-98, 112, 139; internal, 64-66, 97, 1 0 1 - 1 0 2 , 1 1 2 1 1 4 , 1 3 1 , 157, 220, 228, 235; and word, 66, 1 0 1 , 1 1 3 , 233 Visual meaning, 113—114 Vives,Jan-Luis, 1 3 5 , 137, 1 7 1 Vocabula artis, 93, 234 Void, 5 2 - 5 3 , 60-63, 95. 1 7 6 - 1 7 7 Wake, William, 60 Warrington, Ronnie, 84, 202-203, 213

279

Watkin, Thomas Glyn, 1 1 0 West, William, 203 Whitlocke, James, 68 Widow, 1 6 - 1 8 , 21, 22-26, 32, 36-38, 125, 1 4 1 , 166 Wilson, Thomas, 5, 104, 142, 183 Wiseman, Sir Robert, 27, 3 1 , 1 7 1 , 175 Witches, 53-54, 63, 96-100, 1 1 9 - 1 2 0 , 176 Witcraft, 104 Wolff,J., 164 Woman's Woorth, 1 3 0 - 1 3 9 Women, x, 1 1 , 12, 2 1 , 37, 52-54, 62-63, 90, 95-100; and image, x, 11, 1 6 - 1 7 , 37 - 3®> 59> 96-98, 1 0 0 - 1 1 2 , 1 3 3 , 1 3 9 - 1 4 2 ; and law, 90, 1 1 2 , 1 1 4 - 1 3 0 , 1 3 2 - 1 3 8 , 1 6 4 170, 196-197; ontology of, 1 2 1 - 1 2 4 , 1 2 6 - 1 2 8 , 133, 1 4 1 , 1 5 6 - 1 5 7 , 1 6 9 - 1 7 0 ; and rhetoric, 1 8 1 - 1 8 6 ; and truth, 1 3 7 138 Wood, Thomas, 122, 163-164, 167, 173, 195 Word, 42, 58-59, 64-67, 1 0 1 - 1 0 2 , 1 1 2 - 1 1 3 , 1 3 4 - 1 3 5 ; and image, 1 1 2 - 1 1 4 , 1 8 5 - 1 8 9 , 220-222; and letter, 205-206; and soul, 1 0 2 - 1 0 3 , 1 8 2 - 1 8 5 , 235-236 Wrangling, 72-73 Writing, 37-40, 50, 63-66, 83,93-94, 112, 13 1 Xenophobia, 55, 2 1 1 - 2 2 0 Year Books, 76, 140 Zelophehad, 126 Zulueta, F. de, 205, 211

Designer: Compositor: Text: Display: Printer: Binder:

U.C. Press Staff Prestige Typography 10/12 Baskerville Baskerville Braun-Brumfield, Inc. Braun-Brumfield, Inc.