Women in Muslim Family Law: Second Edition 9780815629085, 0815629087

Table of contents :
Cover Page
Title Page
Copyright Page
Dedication
Contents
Preface
Preface to the First Edition
Chapter 1. The Sources of Islamic Law
Chapter 2. Classical Muslim Family Law
Chapter 3. Modern Muslim Family Law in Comparative Perspective
Chapter 4. Toward a Legal Methodology for Reform
Notes
Modern Legal Codes Consulted
Suggested Readings
Index

Citation preview

Women in Muslim Family [aw

& Contemporary Issues in the Middle East

Other titles in Contemporary Issues in the Middle East Arab-Israeli Dilemma. Third Edition. Fred J. Khouri The Arab Left. Tareq Y. Ismael

Beyond Camp David: Emerging Alignments and Leaders in the Middle East. Paul A. Jureidini & R. D. McLaurin Bitter Legacy: Ideology and Politics in the Arab World. Paul Salem Faith and Freedom: Women’s Human Rights in the Muslim World. Mahnaz Afkhami, ed. Islam: Continutiy and Change in the Modern world, Second Edition. John Obert Voll Islam and Politics. Fourth Edition. John L. Esposito The Islamic Impact. Yvonne Yazbeck Haddad, Byron Haines, & Ellison Findly, eds. The Middle East from the Iran-Contra Affair to the Intifada. Robert O. Freedman, ed. The Politics of Social Transformation in Afghanistan, Iran, and Pakistan, Myron Weiner & Ali Banuazizi, eds. Sandcastles: The Arabs in Search of the Modern World. Milton Viorst The Second Message of Islam. Mahmoud Mohammed Taha; Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im, trans.

.. . rer f woe oa oe . Cyc bevasculuts ee ee eee ghee

=eareRES mhosaoe pence =. ood orgDad oeyeguie Se : a. 4 as waae a._ Sane. i ee wget ee hoe

BBL hoe Berower |ae ’ Hite TAS | pie Saks yh OE) ee eee ee:4 . :Liat haggle. es | oye aSyee ee UE SE i, ears Sete ee; .7 . . nats iyPoe BsBETES SUA Shy esTSS SA io OM : aiaah aa eaeie ooheecte Bea ae “Es he‘ ee CANE: es aeEPO Re ane efge ae oe Yaia:

BE. ; esineeabe : i ses ‘ beacy meen 5 ce eaeSfOSE ie See : . Boe a Pe ee a. 8 fe go .oo Ajll,| . . |

ie 2e8Tee Sa: aeteoe . oS eeees ek,: | ; ; _ z| |iaJie 2: m; — er. Peet gS?eee we fe ee ae . ne ae Shcmane i oh Nek¢Ee: aoe[aan ae ‘ ed . PensRA i oe.ie, METhee SEASae eer22 Beh vee get2 Sage 1hee UREA Pacease OS? . . le ;es yon eee seyay — & Beer es dani iE Sy gas Oe Tae ee ene SE re wath Me EU 2) Ong A, BEAR ose Ba Soy TNS aie Pavan ; ,. Mop oe oe Pas ee She . . Ts ele we Sas . eateege” wote : Mets aro Parr reecis eeeae Ae we, ieaaS fiat oe Se = a “ e ee * ae: METRES deg Pes eT ee OES tls ne ER | :ie “S -aoe ms: Lo S °cots See Mare he 8 ae ipSeces ages : ees Oe ryete eee Ely Eee ee se 5 So onasDUE TUS soe fsUn Toa Bie 8s be is ae qroe ~ aloe j | ee, =ge eae a ‘ > . SY wiser ye . as | es Soe aa : ss2. ae oe a wed vot ace ” . Me 3 : WEED Ce, eo Ro : ar Deng ny. on or. FERS Ss: es anes paris 1h SAU i ae mA Ss, aad eya yg. ENR : eee Blige, fae:ioe ee . CBr LSon eSE,Bag eo CE WS ERE ee aiiates SS. aeeeaThe See BO Be & ee ae ore “REA GES Sa OYate SOF a EAs eS a Faas NY were Cus Ae ; SENS Be ee mad ALS Seren Lae .: rn a aear! woe hoo! SEEPS a pexaeres aca Rees ay Hes Se Bef. Jie woe ee pes . cles: Shas ee ac “ath as See —+as: |

ed aan ne ae Se F an A ae — i isi Abs |

SEL BE Dota on eeEne athe ce eee eteNS EME. ee See SER “5a wouit are Mo tegige ean a:ane ath wk Wh LE annie aaSPS ges; . ears +fous 25 Bu PERS. StAE BE a= Bn fetes 2 woe co a Ae hes noes " Bel Vee Es ae! pole Ton Lor hey an Biel. Beoets KEY ees ARES I Rae he went cen . . ae * an alt, retin Aye RS cme sees, eae : oe (kes i . ia ut oy ae Te se “EYES CT Ronee neces Se,

cee Seppo ot a rn as SECEES ftVena Naeegh con canty my Eos Ng Ce ee. eo CSL toe SEE ae Rare acareniod Bs Ay eee Hse Hee ees SMR Ee rrJay . wad arena a RB gesor! CEs Vee. uy an SOS Th aa0 wed Behe RT : inf Oo: wile ORES FNUES. OR OEE OEE ong Ed eta oo Be ae eaeTs Digs BoneVB giesEy feesWSs - aaren METS) bites ;ASRS " "Re ohlank Bae ae See WER a Daye BEGEY Best Iie Bee ee Pace AR get ae Pecee wy nae Lay Bes age oe ee aes :ee HS eee Tet otake eapoe Phe, .we wots Lut (hore, ibe, entAsti Leer! te Re wes | BESS. Foc oe eee Me ees ones ned Paneer eens Se re we ete te ee : . S e ee Brn SoMa aot gee calle ae, oan : . os oO oe Te eden : . ee SAE MER Cots a ee Santee 3 ae ay, Se pes. of .. eo) aOrne oe Oi Pe og eaesPemecean teKe iy@yMe paced pels | a eo eee “ be SB GE Rema ee Pee goes Rs 2. Prooe-3. Beas mete oa ahen: PeaBSS Oe haan NERC NASU RE.2 _OEE ITs ;Pe ae ae P:.7 ‘a ‘>. Bea: FS ae oer AS vow ee ie Geo BARES Ue SES SS : | : ee oe } i] PS , a wee ung ae “Eh geht SEE :bree .WRSRAS Mes 24 ERS wbiberis eS, . . MRE OE ata Bete .SCSeparne BO ee .chs 2"has, . renee PR+os ser ate uae! Bet near Tsae AERO AAR ey Meds Beg ny .Sif jSER . Farge ec AaOER Piva teSUR eeoe “ISS LASERS Bie mde 2 eS Ee Preece 5) sae?’ we eRe gee Baea es ag ERE . EES ae Bee ee . . 28h. THs Oe wed phe Te a HET uta ss Dnartanaty Hee TEER dl Pe a a Q —- oe ae Co SS EE SEU GS eS ne Cee ee eS, Rae oe i& :PEN OS aye USEol ng see CERES BESO AUN OSE SO yet, Bieter Pa . Eee Se eae : ne. eee osSaEe SEES Se seh, SS shige Sah Aine OUT pcg Bh RS EO RR IS, ; ty eeoe oe oo ee op ee PERSE as DES gereFR ote Bees 4ape deen — = ms, 7ae .OS aAPDS. on Behe LARS Sete Eanes . 5 . ic he ie ER OF 3 es .: |ch : seh Bae ee a “ae EES pe, hg ge ye: Se me eee as i ia eS nee ie By iy ae OG ene ike $ ane Ya Nee BE ek ~ SURE ge Bie est 7 Ea .ae a ae Shee Se eles ad AES SE ie Be A NON rteene [ct Cem oc a CEERI He ett BERET OE es BO eS ENE ee oe Se SUES AEE oe Be oo — :| ;: . SHER i BAS NENG EEE NRE Ee Ue pee Sa ee, Nade 2 a 2g con seage :f hye ae oats a Bere cs Pena oe ea cnar as URI ENS a ga siete Beira Kay e: Sai REE Nee mates. ast SO een eee TE er ae“Sy Mey synef oe Cap nr eeeee SgaarNreee zi INES Saviaeiyghee rit a ew Spent. Wyte ernSaBSL Seeee ae ORKCERY GeesRimes art ngety s

AR vies? aes eES. AGit, .gies ca Abvrgindetes albany, SES ECR MCG PahPayee ne ert wpesas eeh.ROE 5...Hee: MERE A ihsuvaa. *Oe Saiebdatimaelie hl: sceins RR, Pe:fhe ee -:..“| wddelanaseee tri, : Bae osooceg canara “ Hs oct eae my au SSE ora Tae Der eed Sis MUN AIRE Rnicca Baas cence dea Noe INS "OP GY SORES Si ie SS Ron. SERS FEhare cies sasip Seating BEE hoe Seysit aes SS kOe a— | eatouagtee SEES.” PET | eect ge Wena Rear ho Bees ae es "aan .* oe EE coccopcutute TY os . ee OS agSy ake ah oy ana ieOE |OED SRRE Sat Geena-| Lt ESOBAGS ares Bey38, orice .«SRR? 3 OF HCOee RE RISC tS + DN Ce Picts cane “ER NA REIES aaatiy se Peay ee ae ERECT aSRR a‘ eat: : : aM Aer eFPSESS eePORES eae es Sees Petar aint MN SN Pace . no geen “NaSAN Re See. EERIE NC a oleh one stiches hie Bae (te a agen ik pea . : Be pee Ae aah Bee _ cabgsian ewan EG? ADAIR ds ee 8 Hose . EEA Se eeROY es te,PERSE , ialeba sates” fetus, Send eee TEMES: RUA ONO SRR, Bare nie ion nee. | ae SES eG HER GRAL Uae aC a Baoan Aue: ORES Aen ey See 3G UBER So mmre eee RS Ee ange “Re hs a Bae, SEE : Ea REN go OS Br Sere DemeRCtSh ath RR CES Et Ta . Seer 8 RG GTO sigan ae GSES. ERIN th echo ae ae) Ree eset a . “AR gs et eS Soe ass, PREVA, Errereteas ERR ae Sh HORAN FE en ron . ;

B . Hoes TUR bs, Pee . ee ee Per hae a Ee eae |

. TEESE ieSE TURE yok, CEE or a“EE . wet “py eae 4PRT BRE, aan esa8Ae ey RSS taTite PaSue Reon Beis Gore cee SEagals BRE DEne Th, . Tae: .Bee PETS. Si Speco ial of sticks “MR OR Rogier aeSDL Hee RSE |ARAN. . RAE Ls Wc Sate A Sis sarin Ree, RS He EER tb a tgs Scar seein caecoe et ea. aoHee 2g he :Eee "SE Re BRE waa ied Cane ae PSA Prog “yysco Conese « Seger. vege Aa Re Ra Pere cee poe a oye tenpase adie toc. Re eae Riemer oeee SURGES Eds ae89oo ee | eee REC Ges“ale ti sti.ttitetigg caperNeale. SSE UMM eeeun CERES eS EeU oTy, Gt Roe ei tee? Berttr ia HEREC SE be ae RE AROS SEP RSS ee AES oe Sede: PSS Da eas 2SETA nfaeOR™ eSEY AI eck Ete oes BGR HEE See | Ren nhsoe RE IBes ae acy sou sccand Se aa Lop oenrra SEESAR? peas Fieotaae EEO ONAN abs oi cig Biagth Relea ER tte eee ty Tea,ethene Se ON Uae SouRS,. RUS AREAS a in GEER gees. ihe , A ress ESBie SSE OS GE RO eA ER ASByEAN me ee Mah gee“EG Bea” as eae

eS at FD ON GO a ee ee se - S | |

. . ER aggre See “USSR ESE RES ee ee me ORNS (gee ees — . “Sea edie . Oe eran ie eae ees eta : Be. ; Bes Ga op. . settee Boge Ae 'aSoe std ch,tae pease ee Bee NOS yrORS SRN YO a aoyonocntestan SEs Rema’ CERN eS Boe aParas ee LOee SSWHAT ShsCE AEE SP OS rene SSPE, PNAC naa Sapir. A reaoe EU EE RC RES POSSE SER ee ;. WEES Backer EE OCR ae en er ray ee SeegeeeE ke ee!‘gear Soe Apee oeshee ae Bt &phe ‘ See age ERStae a Papers GS eh Re, ley ee ee pacatciea aig meee run stata ss Ua PALS ies Seni Re vars .5 peed vee2Pang see SU agra QE Soe L. “Oe a Se SES “NT eg Somer icard ER LANE a Baie Spe aranset seg oetanies “eeGEaie gees’, PEER Re adasearE Eee Se pean Esse ;

caren SORES Sage eiete ootPRESS ea RHE SRE 8| ;: Oe Be ghee Tiers geeSAN See eiae, cage SERRA oes “ape thHS EEee “eer oa se Seer pow een ieee OEE UES Sg Obie” SEH OoSEA “Ioty, “HERS, Sania TE,,TY a SA EEE ey EEE ANSE Bg NE GB oe aa

eS EE . soe pricxaegiio® “ERE Be” Re Peeper Eee sigeGea ee sc ee See Sijee SLE atures i eeAE ee SR eS OeBeles. hee TRSIN SONG ROE es ee aus eset 2Sees, eer ee EER ONES sce Seaee ais indies POSER BE EIR, Hee yeh! BREF Sane RiegerSSeS ieeeale oF BEE Ge SESEY CERAM Se ale Pe | eo “BSR SAEROERC RE Ts Gee “DBE peas aoc giclee dunt Sy Terie nts. es .

4 Se . ye Bs Bee PSS RENE ices BEDS. ska SERS, antes .

CROP OES | Fey» TERE. AES REE Soave caissate. REO Ec Nae . souctouescaninst Oe —

a — ae ae oe a koe CN | aeoe a Soe Sa, Besa? keoe gee aoSoe aes gaee ; a he Ue oe 2Banta - EES, EPO aeeea: :|,|- | = ee iees, ec dae "SLE ole at2... eyaoe Ete ISSR: Hey citea oe aco omDy ce . oe Ree “eBay. sae ee ne ee oo oe

SEIee hss WAR EOEieccaeei EOS seeBERT ea RE aS ae ee 4 aot aysaoe “Ngeaiey en aia. ge ee erASG FE. SY weeMase ER HS ; lis apa “GaSe BER OIE SCem ORS Soma me ee Repeat Aes BRE. Breer ee apa “RRS pace HER o ee en Se, eae, erate. eee SEARS ERS 8 iSong Pees sie] ete PR a tote sigiiete, WE . pity eee a 9 ale , aoe & ee HS Sop Bye oe, Hi aes ane a Bie. SAR fies eta es.

. 2 SSR, Se IESE eeaes Re ead BS SER TRE Sep:Roe ‘en. dg. ee PRERARY, earaouannoe ene aeas Ro patieaehing oeBes ea Aaa. Ate aeS a ; S a Re Hse age” aRBal “ia 8 pel eotiaehin, SSRN:

BS aeSee ee Stage, SAP fisehay OEE nese 2ee Sean, eee, tise Aen: Ore waite, edi Se Seat pigs iach Sieise Sgiges Seg I psc ss BEN Cu cesta a eel ateBa Rs Ss:es SEERead anoN Sarat, BS esBese eats | SERS eos, Fae stipe Pei ee ee =ES“Diadiaste Sa. ae pete Sea . : Re Besar a athe cat rid Sete INOe SERINE ER, fit RAGE SEN Bo Sas parse te pithy _ utt Petar RRR cs . a-eeaoO sce nn oe Ba a ae ees Sear Sc args SH Mg ec . Bless sca TRA. TGS: BE ce egal aes: FE meet 3h, Me rae aeSSSRS eS, | +: .. Sas ye eee RN iENS ee, Maree END OY cies -ayes pda i, wee * ce Ae Bes He ag ueey rN .See feestos AE WS ateRES Sin Pi aseaeRE. tie UE Ba bi AS ee :EOE Raccmah See seed HEN ESS aeae eeeSRG ay &NEHER Be RG oe steel enone pt a Bie Se3 aS eR aaa a. ae os PeeSees a: eS CoLy -

Se ae a a ee a ro feanorz ae oe—ae= FT |

| say —“oy - re oe.Peis eS eee Re ane CN eo ee Ceebiee uy See oc .aresbta | : es: Bis i Pay tame) SR Nee aaa Soo, een. “oe TN oie wRoc arty , 2.eees z ee ee ae Taek, LSS st ¢ Sate ERE. tae dhaHannes” paatae saleeag sieakhen Raa . te BESN retOG RIGOR. an RNs a‘aieett,, aie ee.3, ee Bina ce Ee. Se cea cs Say ie ae eet ere AIRE ed eeae ae TARE a Cie eg Se ‘ Aa a AR a, ees : a :: me : Sk. Nee ae SRN EET Sheu AES. i ro) Pe ae Ae sae POR, «AIEEE OR eG SMEZS. ease iP Taava aA tot St NeBa L os Ct ; _ . is Bas eae he SURE AEBeinn ae. pare Roe grabs ae oaerBess cuaeeeae”

AREER ES “US anes Wea, _,aegesAe EENTa RGR Ss ai isk oe : soar eres See a »a-omSea-sakSay :ierat‘ae aSata |fe AESSIS De aBia"He atone eahee “BROPEE aaSSS a ala ses nr epee .Pammmee : i$SERRE ite. ReOL AgereERziEo ectiysokittale: See wean ety . nes oan ene Sees Peer am Nap aie, ARERR "iE : RS i RSH ON(! Reith, | have oe fou ieee ee. aecolt Gin hae Pe ee "Ay Bh “ORES .5) x Re Sas) COR vayHENS tye aioe ge ae : aes 4 nee wae, WAG apes Sey eae ES eee ET SERGE ee Seay Ba Gary. a MOUNTS, VEC, Beane Sa, "IP aeRgee Maar SRe # = SRS) es SG RAST ET CCAR, Tate gt: ‘gehts ee, ie a- i : a | wa Betas ia 4 he x fac es ta eee eee Bato Mpspe abit . ERE, /eS =Get ‘ Rs DIR iateasee: Meh i hemanech VANES ieeehc 3 ve rn a , > .pieoe a aes. OBA claim ep ree oss al if i Pe r sate aie” . 5 tee a We nig "ae ALPS Yee oe Ts Hoes SO 9 rey f BRS ES ot ie Ge oe po _esceitn SE me of ree. FRE dees aoe Seneee eS: seuannatiny, GRRE, : See" ar re ee Be. PESi iBsa ee, ae : eae CRG: Aap ,

7 Ue Bp ey ge ee a S ae, ove 9 .

ae Bees ARE? AER. Sa Re i |

Copyright © 2001 by Syracuse University Press Syracuse, New York 13244-5160 All Rights Reserved First Edition 1982 Second Edition 2001

04 05 06 65432 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI 239. 48~1984,oo™

Esposito, John L. ,

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Women in Muslim family law / John L. Esposito with Natana J. DeLong-Bas.—2nd ed.

p.cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8156-2908-7 (pbk.) 1. Women-—Legal status, laws, etc. (Islamic law) 2. Domestic relations (Islamic law) I. DeLong-Bas, Natana J. Il. Title. LAW

346.5601'34—dc21 2001034382

For Jean and my parents, who are always there.

John L. Esposito is University Professor at Georgetown University and director of the Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding in the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service. He is also the edi-

tor-in-chief of The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern Islamic World and The Oxford History of Islam. His other publications include Islam and Politics, The Islamic Threat: Myth or Reality? Islam and Democracy and Makers of Contemporary Islam (with John O.

Voll); Islam: The Straight Path; and Islam, Gender and Social Change (with Yvonne Haddad).

Natana J. DeLong-Bas is a Ph.D. candidate in history at Georgetown University. She is completing her dissertation on Islamic law, women and gender, and religious violence in the works of Muhammad Ibn Abd al-Wahhab and is a contributor to and editor for the forthcoming Oxford Dictionary of Islam.

Contents

Preface ix Preface to the First Edition xiii

4. TheSourcesofIslamicLaw 1 2. Classical Muslim Family Law 12 4. Modern Muslim Family Law in Comparative Perspective 47 4. Toward a Legal Methodology for Reform 127

Notes 167 Modern Legal Codes Consulted 175

Suggested Readings 177

Index 183

Preface

MUCH HAS OCCURRED in the world of Islam since the publication of the first edition of Women in Muslim Family Law. Islam has continued to play a significant role in the political and social devel-

opment of Muslim societies. New Islamic republics and Muslim governments have been established. Islamic activism has found expression not only in radical politics but also in mainstream politics and society. Islamic organizations and candidates have participated successfully in electoral politics, demonstrating the extent to which in many countries they constitute the only viable opposition or alternative. Islamists have been elected mayors and parliamentarians and have served in cabinets and as prime minister of Turkey and deputy prime minister of Malaysia. At the same time, Islam has proven an effective social force; Islamically inspired schools, clinics, social welfare services, and insurance and finance companies have proliferated. Governments faced with crises of identity and political legitimacy, whatever their orientation, have witnessed the Islamization of rhetoric and society, accompanied by pressures to reformulate ideas, values, and legislation within an Islamic framework. Unlike “traditionalists,” mainstream

Islamists are not necessarily against certain legal reforms and women’s participation in the political arena, provided that changes are legitimated within an Islamic framework and that women preserve and reflect Islamic identity, conduct, and values. If some call for the implementation of Islamic law (Shariah), others call for the Islamization of existing laws. Pakistan, Sudan, Iran, and especially Afghanistan, where the Taliban has used heavy-handed enforcement of sexual segregation and veiling, are often cited as examples of the oppressive implemenIx

Preface

tation of Shariah by those arguing that international standards of human rights and Islamic law are not compatible. This in turn raises the question, “Who determines what constitutes ‘international standards’?” Human rights activists argue that secular international law must be accepted by the entire world as the highest legal standard. Religious activists argue that they owe obedience first and foremost

to religious law, and that man-made laws cannot and should not override divine revelation. Three approaches to the place of Islamic law in Muslim societies continue to be found among Muslims, The first maintains that religious law is outdated and incompatible with modern needs. Thus, Western secular law should be adopted and religious law completely eradicated. The second asserts that what is needed is a more literal restoration of the classical Islamic legal tradition. The third seeks to use the tools or methods of Islamic law to reinterpret and apply Is- _ lamic principles and values in developing new legislation to address the needs of modern society. In many Muslim societies today, there

is a demand for greater Islamization of the law with the aim of creating legal and judicial systems that are more “authentic” and

“legitimate.” ,

Discussion of Islamic law and of Muslim family law raises ques-

tions about theory versus practice or legal texts versus the applica-

tion of law. This volume is concerned with Muslim family law itself—its classical formulation and modern reforms—rather than its specific application by courts. Many women’s activists today see

the more important initial goal as reform of actual law, with a “trickle down” effect that influences actual practice produced by educating women about their rights and seeking enforcement of law by the courts. A major development since the 1980s is the rise of women activists and organizations seeking legal reforms. Some, assuming a

, secular perspective, argue for total eradication of Islamic law in favor of Western, secular law, maintaining that Islamic law does not

guarantee equality between genders. Others work within the system, asserting their right to interpret Islam and arguing for reforms on the basis of the intent and the spirit of Quranic injunctions. Rejecting the patriarchy of the past and present, as well as the predominant role of the ulama (religious scholars), they assert the right of xX

Preface

Muslim women to participate along with men in interpreting reli- , gion and religious law. Change in educational and economic status has played a significant role in the greater empowerment of women. The major goal of the modernization and development plans of the 1950s and 1960s was education and employment of women. In a number of Muslim countries, including Egypt, Syria, and Iraq, women began to work

- outside the home in increasing numbers. During the 1970s and 1980s, rising numbers of migrant laborers headed to the Gulf, typically leaving wives and children behind. While some sent money back home, women and minors were left without a male guardian to deal with financial and legal matters. In many countries, women’s contribution to the financial support of families has been necessary to ensure survival. Consequently, some seek reforms in the patriarchal structure that would create shared rights that reflect shared re-

-sponsibilities. Rights are tied to responsibilities; the unequal distribution of rights should not continue to exist when responsibilities are shared. A rising number of women scholars and women’s organizations have taken on the challenge of Ouran and hadith interpretation by inserting themselves into a domain that has traditionally belonged to men. Many approach questions of women’s status and women’s rights in Islam from within the classical tradition and based upon Islamic sources, rather than from a Western or secular perspective. Proceeding from within rather than from “outside” the Islamic tradition can be an effective means of mobilizing popular support and avoiding accusations that they seek to westernize Muslim societies. Factors contributing to women’s involvement in scriptural interpretation include rising female literacy and educational levels; women’s participation in national struggles such as those in Iran and Kuwait, leading to demands for greater freedom and equality; access to religious education, either in the mosque or in women’s study groups;

and rising female employment outside the home, which grants women greater financial independence and the opportunity to interact with other women and contribute to the demand for equal status

and legal rights. : This second edition of Women in Muslim Family Law both updates and expands coverage of modern reforms. Whereas the focus

x! ,

Preface

in the first edition was a comparative study of Egypt and Pakistan, this volume introduces a broader comparative perspective, drawing on examples of major reforms in marriage, divorce, and inheritance from the Middle East, South Asia and Southeast Asia. In order to retain the integrity of the volume and in consideration of the limita-

tions of space, no attempt has been made to provide global and exhaustive coverage. Rather, the intent is to identify and discuss significant variations from diverse Muslim contexts. I have made one

additional change; I have used Majid Fakhry (tr.), The Ouran: A Modern English Version (Reading: England, 1999) for Quranic quotations. I am pleased that many have found Women in Muslim Family Law useful throughout the years, and that it continues to be cited by colleagues and used as a text in courses. The second edition will en-

hance its usefulness and demonstrate the ongoing significance of family law in Islam and in gender relations in the Muslim world. More than twenty years ago, my wife, Jean, played a major role in my completing Women in Muslim Family Law, a role she has continued to play in so many ways throughout the thirty-five years of our marriage. This revision would never have been possible, given my other commitments, without the remarkable efforts of Natana J. DeLong-Bas, my extremely talented and tireless research assistant. To both I remain indebted.

Washington, D.C. | John L. Esposito April 2001

XU

Preface to the |

First Edition

ARAB OIL and the specter of the Islamic resurgence during the 1970s have focused attention on the Muslim world in a way unparalleled in modern times. The Islamic revival occurring in most Muslim countries has manifested itself at both the personal and political levels. Along with increased mosque attendance, concern for more Islamic forms of dress, and a proliferation of religious literature, Islam has also re-emerged in Muslim politics. Islam is used by governments to legitimate their rule and policies, and it also serves as an umbrella for opposition forces who:seek to topple “un-Islamic gov-

ernments.” While Iran has received the greatest media attention, variations on this theme may be found in Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Syria, and Malaysia.

Although profound differences between one Muslim country and another exist, common factors in the Islamic revival include a growing disillusionment with the West, a tendency to blame westernization and secularization for the social disruption and moral decline that has accompanied modernization, and the desire to provide

more cultural continuity between modernity and tradition. While past sociopolitical change is seen as a process of critical imitation of

the West, the call today is for modernization that is more selfconsciously rooted in Islamic history, beliefs, and values. This concern to follow a path of cultural adaptation, rather than to displace the old through a wholesale adoption of the new, raises the practical questions: Does Islam (the Islamic tradition) possess the resources to support and sustain reinterpretation and reform, and thus respond effectively to the demands of modernity? Is Islamic reform possible? What does this mean for women and the family? Xill

Preface to the First Edition

Muslim family law provides the primary example of Islamic reform in the twentieth century. Islamic law (the Shariah) constitutes the ideal blueprint for Muslim society. It is a divinely revealed law, a comprehensive legal system whose laws govern duties to God (ibadat, ritual observances such as prayer, almsgiving, fasting) and du-

ties to one’s fellow man (muamalat, social transactions which include commercial, penal, and family laws). Reflecting the centrality of the family in Islam, family law has been the heart of the Shariah and the major area of Islamic law that has remained in force to govern the lives of more than 800 million Muslims from North Africa to Southeast Asia. While most areas of

Islamic law have been replaced by modern Western legal codes, Muslim family law has provided the major area of Islamic reform. _ Change in family law, then, is significant both as an index of social change and as an illustration of Islamic reform, its methodology,

! and problems. Traditionally, the primary roles of the Muslim woman have been those of wife and mother, living within the extended family in a patriarchal society. Islamic laws set the standards regarding women’s rights and duties; modern reforms have been advocated as seeking to protect and improve women’s status and rights in a changing society with its movement from the extended family to amore nuclear family. Therefore, among the fundamental questions which Muslims face are: Can Islam change? Can change embody an Islamic rationale that reflects continuity between an Islamic past and

modernreforms? = ,

Although studies of family law reform exist, they do not provide the background (development of traditional family law) and context

(traditional status of women and the family) necessary for understanding the significance of modern reforms. Secondly, Western scholarship has generally approached the subject from without rather than from within, exploring the resources of the Islamic tradition to supply a rationale and systematic methodology for Islamic

reform. , ,

— This study will first discuss the historical and legal context for reform (the origins, development, and content of Islamic law). It will then analyze the process, methodology, and extent of modern legal reforms, focusing on changes in Egypt and Pakistan, countries that lend themselves to comparison and contrast. Both countries offiXIV

| Preface to the First Edition cially follow the same traditional school of Islamic law (Hanafi), and both were initiators of family law reform, Moreover, in both Egypt and Pakistan, strong movements to establish more Islamically | oriented societies have surfaced. The introduction of more Islamic law has become an important issue in Egyptian and Pakistani politics. A major aspect of this effort to establish an Islamic identity more firmly has been a re-examination of the question: What does it ~ mean to be a Muslim woman? This is reflected in women’s return to _ more traditional Islamic forms of dress and behavior, as well as calls for the repeal of certain aspects of family law reform that are seen as

' un-Islamic. However, significant differences between the Egyptian and Pakistani experiences exist, both in the extent of reform and the

legal methodology utilized. : Reform efforts in each country exemplify and illustrate the major legal approaches employed thus far in the Muslim world, as well as the problems and issues surrounding Islamic reform. Where relevant, major family law reforms from other parts of the Muslim world will also be discussed to provide a total picture of the changing status of Muslim women and the possibilities for legal reform. Finally, this study will delineate those dynamic resources in the Islamic

tradition that can provide a methodology for future reformsthatresponds to the continued and changing needs of Muslim society. While this study is inescapably technical in nature, it has been. organized and written to accommodate the nonspecialists as well as the specialists. Diacritical marks have been omitted to simplify reading and to reduce production costs. A brief bibliography has been included for further reading.

I am indebted to Ismail R. al-Farugi (Temple University) and Hassan Hanafi (Cairo University) for my early training in Islamic Studies and for their many helpful comments and observations throughout the years. Several typists—Barbara Letourneau, Lorna

Mattus, Elizabeth Stebbins, and Kathleen Lauring—have worked oe on successive versions of this manuscript. Finally, my wife Jean, my parents, and brothers have been and continue to be an inestimable source of inspiration and support.

‘Summer 1981 Worcester, Massachusetts JLE

XV

Women in Muslim Family Law