The Nuclear Destruction of the World Trade Center and the China Syndrome Aftermath [3rd ed.]

Citation preview

The Nuclear Destruction of The World Trade Center and

The China Syndrome Aftermath

© The Anonymous Physicist

The Nuclear Destruction of The World Trade Center and

The China Syndrome Aftermath

Third Edition

-1-

The Nuclear Destruction of the World Trade Center and The China Svndrome Aftermath ©Anonymous Physicist

•

The Nuclear estruc ion of The World Trade Center and

The

China Syndrome Aftermath Third Edition © Anonymous Physicist

Copyright © 201 7. Earlier editions copyright 2014, 2012, 2009, 2006 By The Anonymous Physicist, All Rights Reserved Illegal to post online or on cloud or to copy, scan or print without payment to the Anonymous physicist 152 Pages, 40 Illustrations Price: $40.00 U.S. or $100.00 for hard cover, color version. Plus shipping. Price subject to change AnonymousPhysicist.com or [email protected] To find out why 9/11 was done, be sure to also order the author's other book: Quarantine: Mankind held Hostage: Deciphering Man's Past, Present, and Precarious Future, 2nd Ed. Price: $40.00 U.S. plus shipping Third book, The Anonymous Physicist Reveals 1v1ore Secrets of i.'Vfan's History, F-u.ture

and Quarantine, and of the Nuclear Destruction of the World Trade Center. New fourth book: Further Secrets of the Quarantine by the Anonymous Physicist. Order all four today. -2-

The Nuclear Destruction ofthe World Trade Center and The China Syndrome Aftermath ©Anonymous Physicist

To

John Fitzgerald Kennedy,

For you knew that they would likely murder you; yet you took them all on-alone with only your brother, Robert. Despite all you had-wealth, power, intellect, and more-you knowingly sacrificed it all for Peace and the betterment of Americans and the world. You took on the Pentagon, and the warmongers, and the Powers That Be behind them. You took on the CIA thugs, the Banksters at the Federal Reserve Bank, the secret societies out of London and Rome. You strived for Peace, "not just in our time, but for all time." They did not even allow it in your own time. Thus we have had perennial war, instead of perennial peace, since they took you from all of us. The horrible country and world we have today is a direct consequence of them taking you from us. Yes, even the American regime's perpetration of the nuclear holocaust on 9 / 11 in New York's World Trade Center is a direct consequence oflosing you. You John got the lead, while they gave me the mercury for speaking out but once on how your Secret Service driver, William Greer blew your brains out, after first shooting Connally. May Americans and the people of the world wake up and act to get justice for you, the people nuked in the WTC, the responders and NYC residents dying of cancer from the ensuing China Syndrome, and for me as well. Though they tried to replace you with murderers, monsters, morons and intel agents, You John, were, and may always remain ...

The last President of the United States.

-3-

The Nuclear Destruction of the World Trade Center and The China Syndrome Aftermath ©Anonymous Physicist

Acknowledgements I thank KB, MLB, MC, DV and TC.

-4-

The Nuclear Destruction of the World Trade Center and The China Svndrome Afiermath ©Anonymous Physicist

TABLE OF CONTENTS Part I: The Nuclear Destruction of the World Trade Center 1. A Summary: WTC Nuclear Destruction & CSA Evidence ................................................... P. 11 2. On The Existence of Micro-Nukes, Fizzled Nukes, & The China Syndrome ............................ P. 15 3. Brief Evidence Of Nuclear Bombs Used At The WTC ....................................................... P. 19 4. WTC Nuclear Thesis ............................................................................................... P. 21 5. Where in the World is Felipe David? & Is He a Survivor of Nuclear Radiation? .......................... P. 29 6. Evidence & Testimony Indicating Nuclear Blasts, Nuclear Radiation, & China Syndrome ............. P. 32 7. More On Fizzled Nukes in the WTC on 9/11. .................................................................. P. 38 8. The Final Word on the Tritium ................................................................................... P. 45 9. On The Issue Of Radiation In The Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC ...................................... P. 47 10. Eyewitness Testimony of Firefighters Believing They Were Nuked on 9/11, Early WTC 7 Destruction, EMP, Non-Impact Plane Flyby, & People Being Pushed Out Of A WTC Tower ............ P. 50 11. Summary ofEMP Evidence, & the Final Word on the Damaged Cars ................................... P. 54 12. Cathy T, & The Large Earthquake That Was Felt 1 Mile Away When WTC 1 Was "Hit" .............. P. 58 13. Exposing The "Red Mercury" Nuclear Scam, Other Matters On Nuclear 911, and about Mercury .... P.60 14. WTC 7 Demolition: Conventional, or Nuclear? ................................................................ P. 65 15. Could 9/11 Have Been Done With Thermobaric Explosives? ............................................... P. 69 16. Was the First Atomic Bomb [in modem times] Exploded on an American town by the American Government? Book Review: The Last Wave From Port Chicago ............................................. ....... P. 71 17. Did Two Nuclear Reactors Destroy the WTC on 9111? Review of William Tahil's Book, Ground Zero: The Nuclear Demolition of the WTC, ................... P. 77 18. The Crucial Differences in the Nuclear 9111 Theories. A Call To Eliminate Nuclear 9111 Misor Dis-Information & Attain Completeness and Fit all the Known Evidence ............................... P. 84 19. The OCT/Bazant's Bogus Dust Analysis, Prosecutable Fraud Committed ................................ P. 88 20. Further Examination of the Physical and Mathematical Hoaxes in Bazant's Papers, Fraud Proven... P.93

-5-

The Nuclear Destruction ofthe World Trade Center and The China Syndrome Aftermath ©Anonymous Physicist

Part II: The China Syndrome Aftermath (CSA) 21. The "China Syndrome" Exploded On To New York City on 9/11/2001.. ................................. P. 99 22. Micro-Nukes in the WTC-Creating The CSA: Important Matters of Completeness & Plausibility .. P.101 23. Proof of Extremely High Temperatures, & the Firemen's Melted Boots 8 Weeks Later............... P. 104 24. Further Revelations on Molten Steel and High Temperatures, the CSA at the WTC .................... P. 106 25. The Immediate & Continuous Radiation Lowering, & Shielding, Techniques Used at the WTC ... P. 108 26. Has the S.O.P for the CSA at the WTC been Completely Revealed? .................................... P. 110 27. If the WTC Nuclear Destruction Had the China Syndrome, Why Didn't Hiroshima? .................. P. 112 28. Further Analogies Between the WTC and Chernobyl China Syndromes ................................ P. 115 29. Chernobyl's China Syndrome Gets New "Coffin", Review of the CSA at the WTC .................. P. 117 30. The Regime Tries To Hide the Nuking of the WTC, and The CSA-the End of"DEW" ............ P. 119 31. Paper from Steven Jones, et al.: A Pseudo-Masterpiece of Circular Logic To Hide The CSA ....... P. 122 32. Future Psyops, & What We Can Expect From the WTC's CSA in the Coming Years ................. P. 127

Third Edition Updates ....................................................................................... P. 135

Conclusion ......................................................................................................... P. 148 Bibliography ....................................................................................................... P. 151

-6-

The Nuclear Destruction ofthe World Trade Center and The China Syndrome Aftermath ©Anonymous Physicist

PREFACE I never intended to write about the nuclear destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) on 9 / 11/01, and the China Syndrome Aftermath (CSA)-perpetrated by the American regime. But I could not remain . silent after seeing that not only was the Government's Official Collapse Theory (OCT) physically impossible, but also the supposed alternative hypotheses making the rounds on the internet were obviously also physically impossible and devoid of evidence. They were clearly (to me) the creation of the regime's intelligence agencies, and are Limited Hangouts. This type of disinformation, orchestrated by covert, in tel agents, masquerading as "9 / 11 truthers," was meant to take all the data and all the videoed or photographed phenomena that depict nuclear matters, and claim that they are evidence of something else. I was also disgusted that with all the many thousands of physicists in the USA, and abroad, not one other had come out to tell the truth about the nuking of the WTC and the CSA. I suppose fear and denial rule physicists, as well as they do much of the general populace in the USA nowadays. I have also revealed part of the motivation for doing this was an attempt to get a modicum of justice for myself. Since I revealed, in the early 1990's, that President Kennedy was murdered by his Secret Service driver, Williruil Greer-who had moments earlier accidentally first shot Gov. Connally-I have been brutally assaulted, car chased and my home was made into a veritable gas chamber when agents broke in and placed an unknown mercury compound onto all the floors and countertops. Breathing in the out-gassing of the mercury for nearly two years destroyed my health and my life. I have been very ill since 2000 when I first collapsed. I want this information to get out now. Part I of this book is about all the evidence of the regime's use of small nuclear bombs to destroy the WTC on 9 / 11. Part II is about the high heat and molten metal that remained in the rubble pile and underneath the skyscrapers at the WTC for up to six months afterwards-the China Syndrome of heat generating-not "heat lingering"-radioactive fragments. These were the remnants of the nuclear bombs that the buildings had contained. The reader should read as much of this book as possible. It's written for the average layman. But if there are a bare few pages that may have some scientific matters, just scan those pages, and go on. Please examine the facts for yourself and make up your own mind. You will learn some fascinating concepts concerning the use of small nuclear bombs-fizzled nukes, fratricided nukes, and that they are all surprisingly of low efficiency. The latter means only 1-6% of their fissile material is actually converted to energy; the remainder is available for the China Syndrome. Fratricided nukes refers to several things. If a nuke goes off, it may impact a nearby additional-here redundant-nuke, and adversely impact it in a way such that the impacted nuke can no longer go critical, or fully critical, and it will fizzle-or fail to attain full, or any, criticality as a nuclear bomb. The second meaning of fratricided nukes refers to the fact that even during storage, some radiation leakage may cause the same result for a "brother" nuke nearby. Well those were really the only terms that might be new to you; you're ready to go.

-7-

The Nuclear Destruction o[the World Trade Center and The China Syndrome Aftermath ©Anonymous Physicist

Finally I ask that if you appreciate this work, and that I have done it when I am so ill, and how I have suffered so greatly, I ask that you recommend others to purchase this book, and respect the law, and not photocopy it. In fact, I have put out a call for financial-and other-assistance because of how the results of their mercury poisoning me, have left me. Anyone who can help is asked to contact me. So this book is likely to be a collector's item for several reasons. I have written a separate, companion book, revealing the Ultimate Truths of why a Peace President was murdered, and why they really did 9/11, and indeed to explain Man's history of chaos, war and evil. It will explain both the ultimate cause of 9/11, and Man's history perhaps better than anything else. It is titled, Quaranttine: Mankind Held Hostage, 2nd Ed: Deciphering Man's Past, Present, and Precarious Future

I wish you all peace, freedom and justice.

-8-

The Nuclear Destruction of the World Trade Center and The China Syndrome Aftermath ©Anonymous Physicist

PARTI:

Th

ol th

World Trade Center

-9-

The Nuclear Destruction of the World Trade Center and The China Syndrome Aftermath ©Anonymous Physicist

Underground nuclear test-Operation Storax Sedan-in Nevada, on July 6, 1962. Part of Project Plowshare, to use nukes for underground construction ... or DEstruction? Please compare this with the WTC cover page photo of this book. Note that both show a central mushroom cloud, and both show the outer regions being projected outward in a parabolic manner.

-10-

The Nuclear Destruction ofthe World Trade Center and The China Syndrome Afiermath ©Anonymous Physicist

Chapter 1

A Summary: World Trade Center Destruction & High Temperature Aftermath: ONLY Nuclear Bombs and the China Syndrome Fit All the Evidence In attempting to ascertain what caused the destruction of the WTC on 9 / 11/01-and the great heat and molten metal observed for up to six months afterwards-one must account for all the phenomena involved in WTC destruction, and the aftermath. One must not cite just one or two factors. Only nuclear bombs and the resulting China Syndrome can account for all phenomena observed. But, at the outset, we should realize that there is an abundance of evidence that the O.C.T. (Official Collapse Theory) is quite bogus. For example, sworn testimony, as well as audio recordings, from firemen/responders contains their witnessing of loud explosions from the onset of-and even before-tower "collapse". This alone destroys the ludicrous OCT of gravity-driven, progressive collapse. A brief summary of the nuclear aspects now follows. All these points will be greatly expounded upon throughout this section. 1. Low yield nukes & low-radiation nukes are a proven fact that the U.S Government has admitted to since the l 950's with their Davey Crocket riflel, and more recently with a physicist's testimony to the U.S. Congress.2 It is also documented fact that since the l 960's, and Project Plowsharea low radiation

nukes-and later neutron bombs-have been available, and were planned for excavation projects and such. The low yield nukes are called mini-nukes or micro-nukes. My "numerous small nukes" WTC destruction hypothesis indicates that numerous low yield nukes went off inside the towers. They vaporized anything near them-via million degree temperatures and/or neutron bombardment-but the yield of these micro-nukes was deliberately small enough not to vaporize the outer structure. This also ensured that any radiation was contained during detonation. 2. Massive evidence of Electromagnetic Pulses (EMP) from nukes. This includes the eyewitness, sworn testimony of EMT responders, Patricia Ondrovic, Robert Ruiz, and others. Ondrovic reported that as WTC 1 was beginning to be destroyed, she saw flickering lights in the WTC 6 lobby which she tried to enter, but was stopped. And just outside at that time, cars caught fire without any visible reason. One car then had its door explode off of it, which hit and injured her as she began to flee the area. Exactly how EMP from nukes did all this is explained in Chapter 11, along with other evidence of EMP during tower destruction from nuclear bombs.

3. Dust particle size was less than 2.5 micron-and lied about by the Government's main O.C.T. engineer/author. You can think of a mortar and pestle, and grinding something large into smaller and smaller pieces. It takes more and more energy input to yield smaller and smaller pieces. A nuclear bomb is known to yield particle sizes down to 10 nanometers. 1 nanometer is 1 billionth of a meter. And Government scientists had equipment to analyze the WTC dust down to IO-nanometer size, if they wanted to, and should have. Unless they did, and have refused to release this. What they-the U.S. Geological Survey scientists-did was lump together all dust sizes less than 2.5 microns

-11-

The Nuclear Destruction of the World Trade Center and The China Syndrome Aftermath ©Anonymous Physicist

and released this data. A micron is 1 millionth of a meter, and a thousand times larger than 1 nanometer. Nonetheless, the Government's main 9/ 11 engineer/author, Z.P. Bazant, numerous times, wrote papers that claimed 10 microns was the smallest size particles created during WTC destruction, and later collected and reported by USGS scientists. For years he did not cite the work that showed this. In Dec., 2007 he did cite a reference, and it led back to the 2.5 micron study, not to the 10 microns he claimed as the smallest dust particle size! So he flat out committed fraud here. He had to do this as his bogus papers claim that the gravitational potential energy-basically height times weight-of the towers accounted for the energy needed to create the smallest dust particle size. And there isn't enough energy from his theory to account for 2.5 micron size dust, let alone the much smaller dust sizes that the USGS did not ascertain or release! I will demonstrate the bogus physics and math from Bazant, and others, in Chapters 19 and 20. 4. Melted, hanging skin without fire was reported by at least 4 known WTC survivors. This includes WTC worker Felipe David, whose own words state this occurred without fire. (See Chapter 5.) But his story when told by another, has "fire" added. There are also two women who reported, on the Larry King Show, that a similar thing happened to them, and they don't know why, because they too were not in any fire. And there is also a security guard with a similar report. The security guard and Felipe David had this happen to them in the lobby and the sub-basement area of WTC 1, respectively. Outside the towers, firemen/responders also felt great heat on their skin without being near any fire during tower destruction. The thermal rays of a nuclear bomb can account for this. They go out the farthest when a nuke goes off. And hanging skin was a common occurrence in Hiroshima survivors.

5. In a sub-basement level, a large steel press was vaporized & a heavy concrete/ steel door was left shriveled up like foil. At the same time as Felipe David's nightmare was unfolding, and also in the sub-basement, WTC engineer Mike Pecoraro reports going up a level and seeing that a sub-basement level was in shambles and was "just gone." (See Chapter 6.) He stated a 50-ton steel press had apparently been vaporized, and a 300 pound steel/ concrete door was "wrinkled up like a piece of aluminum foil." The only things that could do this are the multi-million degree temperatures, and neutron bombardment, from a nuclear bomb. Coupling this with the four survivors who had melted, hanging skin at this same time, we have evidence of blast, high temperatures, neutron bombardment and thermal rays-all virtual proof of nuclear bomb use. 6. Heat generation at the WTC for up to 6 months after 9/ 11-The China Syndrome Aftermath (CSA) No heat "lingers" for weeks and months, not alleged jet fuel, not alleged thermite-which would have been used up either in minutes or hours-or during its use as an explosive. We have the documented, witnessed4, and photographed and videotaped great heat and molten metal for weeks, indeed for up to six months underground at the WTC. This lasted until all radioactive fission fragments were reached and carted away. No heat lingers for that long; this could only have been heat generation. The evidence of great heat at many locations in the rubble pile, and even higher temperatures underneath the two towers and WTC 7 is massive. It included melted firemen's boots, even dogs had to wear special boots, a mass of congealed bullets in WTC 6 going off weeks later from heat, and many photos of steam emanation from the continual water hosing of the "hotspots" all around the WTC. The China Syndrome had to arise because each of the numerous small nukes used up only l-6o/o of its fissile material-which is standard for nukes. The remainder was then available as radioactive fragments, releasing great heat for a long -12-

The Nuclear Destruction of the World Trade Center and The China Syndrome Aftermath ©Anonymous Physicist

time-until removed. This is due to the half-life of Uranium 235 being 700 million years. And it is likely that there were numerous, redundant nukes employed, and the phenomena of fratricided and fizzled nukes may also have occurred as these are common with nuclear detonations. (Details are below.) These effects likely further exacerbated the China Syndrome. The radioactive fragments were somewhat dispersed throughout the rubble pile, and in greatest concentration underneath the towers and WTC 7-where water and sand treatments could not readily be employed. Note that the alleged Tritium finding that the Government released, may be a red herring to fool people to look for top-secret unknown types of nukes, which couldn't have led to the CSA, which is what clearly occurred. 7. The missing people, furniture, steel & other contents of the towers. Destruction of the towers vaporized many of the nearly 3,000 people who died, as well as much furniture, steel and other building contents. The NYC medical examiner was unable to find or utilize any strands of DNA for 1157 people. The rubble pile from the two towers was only a couple of stories high when it should have been several times higher from a "collapse," or even a conventional demolition. There is much missing mass from the "extraordinarily high temperatures" as fire engineering Professor Barnett declared after examining vaporized steel, that occurred during tower /WTC 7 destruction. Nukes vaporize matter near their hypocenter. Thermite, and thermobarics, do not. Contrary to what some claim, neither thermite nor thermobarics could vaporize the missing people, furniture, steel, and other contents, as detailed in Chapter 15. 8. Classical Government disinfo methods ensued whereby their agents put out supposedly "alternative theories" involving alleged "secret, new technologies" that are either evidencefree and/or impossible. Space Beams/DEW (Directed Energy Weapons), or ludicrous "super nanocomposite thermite burns forever" theories were created by the intel agencies to cover up the nuking of the WTC, and the China Syndrome Aftermath. We will see that thermite cools off in minutes or hours. These "theories" desperately try to claim new phenomena, or new laws of physics and chemistry as does the 9 / 11 Commission's ludicrous "findings." 9. More now on the issue of Radiation: The # 1 item above showed that the Government has had mini-nukes, and micro-nukes for decades, and that low-radiation yielding nukes have also been around for decades as well. On the other hand, the great heat and molten metal at, and under, the WTC for up to six months after 9 / 11, indicates the existence of the China Syndrome Aftermath. Thus many responders, and Metro New York residents, may have been exposed to some radiation from radioactive fission fragments that resulted from the use of the many micro-nukes. We have much indirect evidence of the effects of radiation poisoning among the 40,000 responders who were at "Ground Zero" in the weeks and months afterwards. There have been hundreds of reported cases of blood, lymph and thyroid cancers among responders. s These types of cancers frequently arise from radiation exposure, and are much less likely-unlike lung diseases-to arise from inhalation of toxins. Also, the teeth and hair falling out reported by several responders are also standard illnesses from radiation poisoning. These responders' doctors and lawyers are not telling these people that radiation may have caused their illnesses, because the CSA remains one of the Government's most closely guarded secrets. However, we can see that the Government itself was well aware of what it had caused! Standard radiation-lowering methods were employed beginning the very next morning-9/ 12/01! See Part II, the CSA, in this book. These methods included water dilution/hosing down of the rubble pile, and sand/earth -13-

The Nuclear Destruction ofthe World Trade Center and The China Svndrome Afiermath ©Anonymous Physicist

covering-and subsequent removal of this sand/earth. These procedures continued for weeks and months, precisely because the rubble pile, and underground areas, were replete with radioactive fission fragments. There is some general information on radiation sources that needs elucidation. Due to absorption and other factors, radiation levels can go down quickly, unless radioactive fragments (radionuclides) are released to the environment. Unless one is close-like Felipe David, who appears to have received thermal radiation, and not ionizing radiation-or the radiation is very intense, enough distance/ air or most materials, will stop most forms of radiation. This assumes one does not inhale or ingest radioactive particles or radionuclides. The underground WTC areas, which likely had the highest radiation yields, and also heat, were off limits to all but a few responders. Also, as Hiroshima studies 6 indicated, it took decades for many cancers and other illnesses to manifest. Note that a Government agency, FEMA, was/is in charge of any radiation data, and could easily have blocked release of any data that found radiation. The U.S. Government has a long, sordid record-see Chapter 6-of lying about radiation exposure to soldiers and citizens, when they nuked their own soldiers during "atomic tests". Honest people, not in denial, must see the analogy to the Reichstag fire set by the German Nazis, in 1933, in Berlin. This was their seat of almost their entire Federal Government. And this fire/ destruction was used as an excuse to destroy their Constitution, and as an excuse for War on "terrorists," and then all of Europe. There was one difference with the Nazis, however. They waited till the middle of the night, when there were no occupants in the Reich stag building! Of course, that German Government did not admit they did it themselves, but that came out after they lost WWII. If U.S. Government agencies have certain types of proof that they nuked the WTC, and thus its largest city, does any honest person think these Government agencies would ever release this data-unless a new Government came about? There is much evidence that other crucial data such as WTC rubble pile temperature (AVIRIS, 2nd set), and seismic recordings were altered. This physicist hypothesizes that WTC responders and nearby Metro New York residents and workers, that were exposed either the longest or to certain areas with the "hottest" spots, face the risk of getting cancer and other immune disorders from radiation exposure in the years and decades to come. Sadly this will prove the China Syndrome Aftermath in the worst possible way. The Government appears to be covering this up.

References: 1.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khyZI3RK21E 2.http://www.house.gov/jec/hearings/ dualuse/leitner.htm 3.http: //uk.youtube.com/watch?v=90jxhDx-iuc 4.http: //www.historycommons.org/ entity.jsp?entity=joe o toole 5. http://www.villagevoice.com/2006-1 l-21 /news/death-by-dust/2 6.http: //www.ehponline.org/members/2006 /9113/9l13.html

-14-

The Nuclear Destruction ofthe World Trade Center and The China Syndrome Aftermath ©Anonymous Physicist

Chapter 2

On the Existence of Mini-Nukes, Micro-Nukes, Fizzled Nukes, and 9/11, and the China Syndrome This author has claimed that numerous mini- or micro-nukes were used to destroy the WTC. There may appear to be a conflict between the "official" listing of minimal, critical masses for small nuclear fission bombs, and the claims of very small yield for such nuclear devices. Now we have sources, like this Wiki article 1 state that about 10 kg. (kilogram) for Plutonium, and 15-50 Kg for Uranium are their minimal critical masses. I have seen other sources put 2 Kg for the minimal critical mass for Plutonium. At the same time, we have a Government physicist at a Congressional hearing, in 1998, who said, "These experiments involve the actual testing of extremely low yield fission devices-as low as the equivalent of several pounds of TNT-within a confined environment."2 Several pounds of TNT is equivalent to about 1/ 10,000,000th (one ten millionth) of the Hiroshima blast. Thus the U.S. Government admitted having micro-nukes, and beyond, in 1998. Such a very small fission yield directly implies a critical mass far below that claimed to be the minimal critical mass for any fission device; thus there appears to be a conflict. How can it be resolved? Obviously one or the other side may be lying. The official listings and equations for finding the smallest critical mass for a given radionuclide may have been made much larger than they really are-ostensibly to deter nuclear proliferation among "newcomers." Or the physicist testifying to Congress could have lied to scare people. Although the Congress did pass legislation barring the production of such extremely small yield nukes. Needless legislation was passed, if this were impossible; but this doesn't prove anything, due to the nature of Congress. Now regarding mini-nukes, as far back as the l 950's, the USA had the Davy Crockett mini-[fission]nuke.3 It was called a recoilless rifle with a range of 2-4 km. It's yield was down to 10 tons of TNT. This is 0.01 Kt (kilotons), or about 1/ 1000 of the Hiroshima blast. Thus it can be called a mini-nuke. Note that this low yield appears to be from less than the "official" minimal critical mass claimed. One would think that with an additional 45 years before 2001, and with the advent of technological breakthroughs, such as nanotechnology-which the military would have had decades before civilian use-ultrasmall nukes would be obtainable, unless truly forbidden by the Laws of Physics. The Wiki article admits, at one point, that "critical mass depends inversely on the square of the density." And there are greater explosives now to implode the material to a greater density, than they had in 1945. As the critical mass equation has the density inversely squared, this could provide for a great shrinkage of the minimal critical mass. There are other relevant things in the Wiki article on critical mass. There is the "fudge factor, f'. And they admit that "sophisticated nuclear weapons programs can make a functional device from less material than more primitive weapons programs require." Can these opposing views be reconciled? How could a micro-nuke be made? At first thought, one might conclude that one would indeed use nanotechnology to emplace Uranium or Plutonium atoms one at a time optimally, to obtain as small, and compact, a nuke as possible; and this may be feasible. But then I realized this may be approaching the problem from the wrong direction. Instead of trying to see how that physicist at the -15-

The Nuclear Destruction o(the World Trade Center and The China Syndrome Aftermath ©Anonymous Physicist

Congressional hearing could build a fission bomb, with a yield of only a few pounds of TNT, from a very tiny amount of Uranium or Plutonium, I may have found better ways. Now the Hiroshima bomb had 80 generations of neutron capture/emission. One neutron yielding 2-3 neutrons with each successful capture by a Uranium nucleus, and so on. 99% of the 13-15 Kt of TNT energy release is said to have occurred in the last 10 generations of neutron capture/emission. That is because of the exponential build-up to the massive numbers of neutrons at the end. So instead of thinking very tiny, what is to stop the following? Start with a Hiroshima bomb, or the smaller Davy Crockett nuke. Then stop the last few generations of neutron emission/ capture to have either of these bombs have a much lower yield. This can probably be attained in numerous ways. 1. A somewhat hollow core or 2. Emplacing one or more spherical shells-or whatever geometry is required-of a neutron absorbing material, at the appropriate radii, to either terminate criticality near the end (or earlier for a very small yield), or go barely critical (as opposed to the initial supercriticality), or possibly sub-critical somewhere in between to slow/halt the reaction. 3. Employ active nanotech devices to halt criticality, even after it has begun. The first method is somewhat obvious, so let's examine the second and third methods. Regarding neutron absorbing shells, we know that the properties of neutron absorbing materials are well known from the nuclear reactor industry. I think this is very attainable. Now for the third method. As the time scale between each of the 80 generations of neutron capture/ emission is 10 nanoseconds, and nanotechnology operates at nanometer distances, it is thus possible that active means could be employed to act on this related time scale. Thus it may be possible to build in active methods to curtail, or halt, a chain reaction, even after it has begun. As they have nano-engines, they could have nano-lasers that could "de-implode" the critical mass, even after it has begun! Thus no Laws of Physics would be violated. So it appears likely that there may be numerous ways to attain micronukes-including with the earlier noted increased density-despite official claims that may be highly exaggerated, or outdated, of 2-10 Kg masses. Indeed if my hypothetical method of creating very low yield nukes above is correct, it allows for even more fissile material to become available for the China Syndrome-see Part II. Indeed these methods may make it easier to produce small yield nukes out of fission only, and not have any fusion. And tiny nukes were needed, at the WTC, so as to not obviously nuke through the whole building at once, or Manhattan for that matter. So if only fission nukes could be made so small, we can see how the redundant emplacement of many of these could have given rise to the China Syndrome, beginning on 9 / 11. Indeed these small nukes that employ methods to "damp" them down, may be difficult to standardize. That is, a little too much damping, and it stops the chain reaction before any significant yield is attained. This is one possible causative factor that may have led to fizzled nukes. E.g., they would have used the lowest yield nukes in the smaller buildings, and possibly many of these same devices were emplaced in the larger towers-or several larger ones, as I originally wrote. I assert that all micro-nukes in WTC 7 fizzled in the morning of 9 / 11, and other nukes had to be later brought in. (See Chapter 7.) And WTC 6, with its nearly perfect spherical hole, looks like just one mini-, or micro-nuke exploded there. If this one had fizzled, they would have had to do a WTC 7 later in the day, for WTC 6 also! That spherical hole may indicate just one nuke went off, and came close to being too large, if you know what I mean. Many smaller ones, to hide the nuking, was the order of the day, if possible. And these methods, to reduce the minimal critical mass, may make these micro-nukes very sensitive to fizzling. So this hypothesis of how to make a micro-nuke, may be coherent with the rest of my hypotheses, including early, fizzled -16-

The Nuclear Destruction of the World Trade Center and The China Syndrome Aftermath ©Anonymous Physicist

nukes in WTC 7, the subsequent China Syndrome of high heat generating radioactive fragments, the three month long hot, large, rubble pile, and the six month long very high heat underneath the towers and WTC 7. The latter due to unreachability of the radiationlowering methods of sand and water. I might even speculate that the fizzled North Korean Nuke, of 2006, may have been given to them by none other than the American regime. Was this one of the WTC-type small nukes-with the same fizzled result? 4 This is part of the Op of having a bogus enemy for a possible bogus future war. So we may have a cohesive body of knowledge tying together micro-nukes, fizzled nukesamong the ones that did go off-on 9/11, and the subsequent China Syndrome at the WTC. Unlike Hiroshima, all this arose because the American regime needed to hide the nuking of New York City from its residents! But the nuclear 9/11 cat is out of the bag, and making its presence more and more known every day.

Fig. 1. Tower for the Upshot Knothole/Ruth Uranium Hydride test (3/31/ 1953). The fizzled nuke failed to vaporize-or even blast away-the bottom of the tower. Expected yield was said to be up to 3 Kilotons. But the actual yield was said to be only .2 Kilotons-1/ 15th of the predicted value-a fizzle. Fig. 2. Hardtack II Lea Test-another fizzled nuke (10/13/1958). On the right. This test was from a balloon at 1500 feet altitude. Its yield was only 1.4 kilotons. Its expected yield was about 10 times greater. What we see is apparently the balloon being vaporized, a mushroom cloud starting to appear on top of it, and at least three mooring cables also being vaporized as heat from the fireball flows into them. Perhaps the Hardtack series of nuclear tests best demonstrate how frequently nukes can fizzle, with either very small yields or even a zero yield.s Fig. 3. The Davy Crockett Mini-Nuke. It's selectable yield ranged from 10-500 tons of TNT. (500 tons of TNT is .5 kilotons.) Its range was 2-4 kilometers. Between 1956 and 1963, 2, 100 were produced. References: 1.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Critical mass 2.http://www.house.gov/jec/hearings/ dualuse/leitner.htm} 3.http: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davy Crockett (nuclear device). 4.http: //www.defensetech.org/ archives/ 002832.html 5.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Operation Hardtack I

-17-

The Nuclear Destruction of the World Trade Center and The China Svndrome Aftermath ©Anonymous Physicist

Chapter 3

Brief Evidence Of Nuclear Bombs Used At The WTC On 9/11/01 - the proven existence of mini-nukes and micro-nukes - massive outward explosions as seen in videos of the towers' "collapses" - the vaporization of a large steel press in the WTC basement - the wrinkling into "foil" of a steel/ concrete door - the spherical blast wave destruction

- Fig. 4. The so-called "nuclear meteorite" (a chunk of WTC debris with 4 floors fused together) - the feeling of heat without fire of numerous witnesses, including firemen -the burned and hanging skin, without fire, of Felipe David, and several others-like many Hiroshima victims - the responders' teeth later falling out, including Sgt. Tartaglia-like numerous American Army A-Bomb test veterans/victims - the missing, presumably vaporized, building contents - the missing, presumably vaporized 1157 people, unaccounted for at Ground Zero - the massive evidence of the China Syndrome of resultant radioactive fragments causing the very high heat and molten steel witnessed, and photographed, by so many firefighter and responders six months after 9 / 11 - the decontamination procedures of rescue workers - EMT Ondrovic's account of Electromagnetic Pulse and instantaneous resultant car fire, and the door exploding into her as WTC 5,6, were being exploded from within, near her (See Chapter 11.) EMT Ruiz also saw a car suddenly catch fire, for no apparent reason. "Don't ask me how." - the micro- or nano-fine particle debris/ dust size

The witnesses for nukes included: -

numerous WTC workers> including Felipe David, -18-

The Nuclear Destruction of the World Trade Center and The China Syndrome Aftermath ©Anonymous Physicist

- numerous firefighters, including Bronx firefighter Joe OToole -

EMTs Patricia Ondrovic & Robert Ruiz

- numerous first responders, including Sgt. Matthew Tartaglia - WTC stationary engineer Mike, Pecoraro - fire engineering professor Dr. Barnett - top British and American Structural Engineers including Keith Eaton, PhD who were shown "secret" molten steel photos denied to the rest of us -

Leslie E. Robertson, {American] Structural Engineer (and partial designer of WTC)

-

Kenneth Holden, NYC Commissioner of Design and Construction

- Thomas von Essen, NYC Fire Commissioner -

Numerous other responder/witnesses to EMP

- other on-scene witnesses have-for the moment-likely been silenced, their testimony redacted, etc. This is witness tampering, and worse. Scientific data have also been cited, including: - AVIRIS, (NASA overhead planes assaying ground temperatures) -

LIDAR, (Light Detection and Ranging)

-

Seismic

-

Cathy Thompson. who witnessed/ experienced a large seismic event

readings

before

"collapse",

Tahil fission study the now exploding number of "rare" cancers among responders, including thyroid, leukemia, and lymph cancer-all common among radiation victims.

-19-

The Nuclear Destruction of the World Trade Center and The China Syndrome Afiermath ©Anonymous Physicist

Chapter 4

WTC 9/11 Nuclear Thesis In destroying the World Trade Center on 9/11/01, the U.S. regime-and those who control it-once again wanted to employ a plan that allowed for their coveted "plausible deniability." As an aside, the plausibility is usually for the American masses. Anyone who is able to think and change usually has more than enough clues to see that these hangouts are, in fact, not plausible. Now only nuclear devices, and their concomitant EMPs, fit all the evidence-along with conventional explosives used in a subordinate manner. But this ultimate truth must be hidden. Just as the regime still hides the likelihood that it nuked its own sailors in the Port Chicago explosion in 1944. (See Chapter 16.) The PTB (Powers That Be) knew the "plausible" ruse that they would put out. It would be the pseudo-free fall time for the planes/fuel/ gravity /pancake hypothesis. The perps (perpetrators) desired that WTC 1 and 2 have top-down "collapses" to go along with the "plane hits." The PTB also always have their disinfo agents waiting in the wings to come out when enough people see that the official ruse is not plausible. With the analogous JFK assassination, when enough people saw that the patsy Oswald-himself CIA/ONI-could not be the culprit shooting from behind, as the fatal shot was from the front; the PTB put out a Babel of controlled alternatives: Mafia, LBJ, Cubans, Grassy Knoll, rogue elements etc. All to hide the horrifying, ultimate truth that the alleged Government protector, Secret Service Agent/limo driver, William Greer did it. With 9/ 11, the Babel of planes/fuel/gravity, thermite, DEW, car bombs in the basement, and surely more to come, was waiting when a critical mass of people rejected the always ludicrous, official, "investigation" conclusion. The massive, rapid outward-as well as downward and upward-explosions of the two towers, the uniquely burnt cars, and popping ceiling lights (Ondrovic), the micron-sized dust from the tower contents, the levels of tritium and heavy metals, the underground molten steel and high temperatures weeks and months later, all can only be accounted for by nuclear devices, their EMPs and the CSA. The fact that the explosions are simultaneously outward, downward and upwards means we have a spherical blast wave, such as occurs with a nuclear device. The anonymous Finnish military expert appears to believe that only one fusion device in the I-kiloton range was used in each tower.1 This may be possible, but is dubious at best. I believe the evidence indicates numerous, small nuclear bombs went off during the destruction of the two towers. Also the dimensions of the towers likely required several nukes. The towers are much taller than their other two dimensions. A single large nuclear, spherical blast wave large enough to destroy a tower's complete height would have been too powerful to be contained in its other two dimensions. The results would have been seen and more catastrophic. So several smaller nukes likely were needed, and used. I believe also that there is much evidence that WTC 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 also were taken down with internal nuclear devices. Accurate analysis may forever only be possible by the perps themselves. This is because of many factors including the immense variation in the possible power, number, and type of nuclear devices used, false evidence (doctored videos, photos, witnesses, media, government reports), complexity of a nuclear explosion, inclusion of non-nuke elements in the "collapses," etc. -20-

The Nuclear Destruction ofthe World Trade Center and The China Syndrome Aftermath ©Anonymous Physicist

In initiating discussion of the possible details of the nuclear devices used on 9 / 11, I note that the number and energy release of these devices are perhaps the most relevant parameters. The Finnish expert states that a 1 kiloton (TNT equivalent) basement fusion device was used on each tower. I believe that a total of 1/ lQth of that amount was sufficient, including the power needed for vaporization/ dustification of each tower's contents. I believe this 1 / 1Qth Kt total energy per tower occurred in several blasts per tower, and in just one per other WTC buildings (possibly 3, 4, 5, 6, 7). What would have been the right range of energy for the desired events while maintaining "plausible deniability?" Or the illusion of that; as many people go into a deep state of denial-just begging for any ludicrous "big lie" from their government as Hitler noted. Too large a nuke and you would instantly vaporize the towers and maybe surrounding areas, and lose the bogus gravity/pancake theory. Too small a nuke and you wouldn't have "shock and awe," nor insure pseudo free fall collapse, and vaporization of the buildings' contents. This was apparently desired-always destroy the evidence, and kill the witnesses. This was aided by the taking of much (radioactive?) material by China-a supposed adversary. This is another indication of the actual, global control of all nations, by the PTB. Other material including human remains went into road pavement. Was all this, including the human remains, radioactive? Now the fission devices that went off at the Trinity/ Alamogordo site, and Hiroshima and Nagasaki were said to be of the order of 10-20 kilotons of TNT. Such devices yield great fluxes of neutrons and gamma rays. Also resultant are air pressure blasts, and tremendous heat of the order of 1-100 million degrees. The low end of that range for fission and the high end for fusion. Modern devices are "steerable" in terms of desired percentages of these output parameters. The "radius of total destruction" in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was about one mile in each city. Total destruction includes vaporization of buildings and people near the hypocenter, or ground zero. The fate of buildings and people near the hypocenter of a nuclear device is indicated by this: "The Shima hospital, the hypocenter of the [Hiroshima] atomic bomb was vaporized, along with all her patients."2 Farther away from the hypocenter, the socalled shadow people left their shadows on buildings as the people vaporized, but not the buildings. Other people still further away, but not vaporized, were left in a charred condition. Farther away still, survivors had burned, or hanging skin. Are all these reasons why we are not allowed to see any photos of any human remains from 9 / 11? We cannot expect every single, murdered person to have been completely vaporized. Photos of body parts in morgues have not been allowed to be seen by the public. Indeed EMT, Patricia Ondrovic, has seen the body parts in the city morgue. Is this part of the redactions to her statement? Returning to the parameters of the nukes of 9/11, given the energy, the destruction radius and other parameters of Hiroshima and its comparison to WTC 1 or 2, the Finnish expert concluded that a single I-kiloton, underground nuke was used. I conclude that likely several nukes per tower were used-but totaling 1 / 10th of a kiloton per tower. One key in my analysis is the number of times we suddenly see massive chunks of building parabolically expelled outwards like the trajectories of large chunks of earth seen in aboveground photos of underground test nukes. WTC 1 and 2 destruction events look more like the underground Nevada nuclear tests, than the Hiroshima bomb. Of course, the towers -21-

The Nuclear Destruction ofthe World Trade Center and The China Syndrome Aftermath ©Anonymous Physicist

were above ground-though the nukes that were used were contained within them-this makes a difference. This towera destruction video appears to show a central mushroom cloud at the end of it. See also the front cover. The similarity to underground test nukes means that any and all nukes were set off at least several floors below any extant levels. A nuke per floor was not likely needed, but this is not impossible either. Rather I see this tremendous outward exploding of large chunks of WTC 1 and 2, about three times per tower. But remember, what we see is soon obscured by dust/debris, and that other buildings also prevent us from seeing much of the bottom half of each tower's destruction. In discussing this aspect, it is important to realize I write now of powerful outward explosions of massive chunks-often appearing to emanate from the center which indeed was the likely location of the nuke(s). These outward explosions need to be distinguished from the outer structure of the towers of which large pieces "peeled away'', and then fell. I believe that this peeling away occurred because there no longer was any inside structure at that level at that time! The remaining, succeeding, inside top portions looked like the final photos of the inside of WTC 6 4 There would still be some outward-vectored force all along the outer structure at all times due to heat and over-pressure inside, causing the "peeling-away" of some of the outer structure observed. But I refer now to the large chunks that suddenly were flung parabolicallyemanating from the center area-to significant distances. The videos seem to indicate that this happened at least 3 times per tower, and again we do not see most of the bottom half. So this could have been 4-6 times. There is one other important thing to say about the large chunks of building ejected parabolically from center of the towers. Their expanding smoke plumes-which leave much of what we see in the video of tower destruction, are very much like meteorites' vapor trails. In both cases, they are evidence of great heat. Meteorites' heat comes from friction with the Earth's atmosphere. With the large chunks of tower matter ejected from the center, it can only mean that the explosions ejecting them were extremely hot as well as very powerful-nukes again. However I note that the well-known collapse/ vaporization of the remaining steel core after WTC 1 fell is seen at the same time that we see the so-called "nuclear glow." 5 Notice how the glow from the WTC 1 nuclear demolition-seen on the left side-causes the whole background to brighten at one point. Then note how the camera is panned to the right so as to no longer video what they were showing in the first place! Was this a "cleaner nuke"-see below-inadvertently captured because there was no building to contain it? Again it would be good, from the perps' viewpoint, to vaporize any remaining structural steel just after final "collapse." So I believe at least a minimum of 4-6 nukes per tower were used. Each one having a radius of about 10-15 floors, or a diameter of about 20-30 floors. Nukes would be placed strategically (centrally?) to try to vaporize the strong 4 7 beam steel core-the sturdiest and most heat-resistant part of the towers' structure-and therefore likely the last to get vaporized. However I now make the assertion that completely doing away with the 4 7 beam steel support core was not necessary. Why? With a nuclear device that vaporizes most of the inside-which will soon be micro-particles floating around outside-there would be little left of the inside to need support! While preferable to do away with as much of this 4 7 steel beam support as possible without "over-nuking" everything, it was therefore not essential for its entirety to be vaporized. Indeed we may see that some of this support-up to about the 60th Floor-remained after "collapse" of WTC 1-and was then itself likely vaporized, -22-

The Nuclear Destruction of the World Trade Center and The China Syndrome Aftermath ©Anonymous Physicist

during the "nuclear glow''. Why was there a need to vaporize the left-over support beams? Because, as my argument above asserts, 100% obliteration of these beams is more necessary for the bogus, gravitational "collapse" mechanism, than for the actual, nuclear destruction mechanism! The perps would want maximum use of each nuke for its full diameter. Pre-planted conventional explosives (thermite /other?) may have been used to initiate each tower's visible collapse, at the appropriate floor-where earlier conventional, shape charges had simulated plane dimensions, and provided initial shock and awe in their fireballs-for public consumption. A properly, pre-placed nuke subsequently went off in each top part, centered in each separated top part after initial demolition began at the appropriate floor. The floors that were "hit" were in fact just exploded as part of the plan, so nukes were preplaced in the centers of the pre-known dimensions of the top tower parts for their subsequent vaporization. These nukes and top vaporizations were initiated shortly after the demolitions began at the "plane-hit" levels. This could explain the "Kinking" in the WTC 2 top. The nuke has caused some loss of integrity-from neutrons or heat-in the structure at that point-and other less visible points-shortly before vaporization. Kinking is a sign of wave interference as wave energy builds up at corners, and the kink is near a corner. The fact that there was a 30-story part of the tower that was tilted and about to fall "badly" is part of the "beauty" of the nuking of the towers, from the perps' viewpoint. This was not likely supposed to happen. But they simply vaporized their error. A centrally placed nuke's spherical blast wave-causing loss of structural integrity-will reach a point directly above it before it would reach all around the building to start the "accordioning" of the entire visible circumferences. This is why the radio tower atop WTC 1 starts to slide down before we see the outer structure start to "collapse." This is part of what I call the inside/out effect, which occurred along with the top/ down effect. Now the two tops had vertical lengths of about 18 and 30 floors. A key factor is that the nukes-not counting any underground ones-are always several floors beneath remaining building levels when they go off. Otherwise-if the nuke was at the surface of the remaining building at that time-building parts would have been expelled to great distances, perhaps many miles away. Also we might have seen more visual evidence of the nuking. Perhaps this is consistent with the "nuclear glow'' seen at the end of WTC 1 "collapse", as there was little or no building left-only debris clouds-at that time to obscure this. Was the glow from a final nuke that also collapsed/vaporized the remaining/standing steel core? A decision as to whether, or not, to use more nukes towards the end of each tower's destruction-when smoke and debris would shield the state of the remaining building could have been facilitated by helicopters, planes, even satellites overhead, which could have scanned the site-using wavelengths that see through smoke-and directed more nuclear (or conventional?) explosions-especially at the lower levels or ground-as needed. Because no official planes hit WTC 3, 4, 5, and 6, what I call "underpowered nukes" were used inside these buildings. WTC 4, 5, and 6 were each 7-9 stories high. They wanted to claim that these edifices were damaged by falling parts of the two towers. So these buildings were not vaporized in near total fashion, as were the two towers. Their outer shells were left over. But the large, nearly, spherical hole in WTC 6, and its deep underground hole, are indications of a likely internal, nuclear spherical blast. In particular, I think that on-scene, EMT Patricia Ondrovic's statements and her heavily redacted interview with the WTC task force6 indicate that she saw-right next to her-EMP (Electromagnetic Pulse) effects from an underground nuke set off in either WTC 6 right near her, or WTC 2.

-23-

The Nuclear Destruction ofthe World Trade Center and The China Syndrome Aftermath ©Anonymous Physicist

I refer to her observations of ceiling lights popping in the lobby of WTC 6, and the cars just outside catching fire at this same time. Indeed the EMP-induced heat on one car door near her, caused it to rapidly expand and explode off the vehicle and hit her. Her interviews indicate that the overheard, commencing, rumbling collapse of WTC 2, further away from her, occurred just as she saw WTC 5 and 6 start to explodej"collapse" right near her. The timing Ondrovic states indicates that WTC 2, WTC 5, and WTC 6 had nukes go off inside each one simultaneously. Fortunately for her, as I noted above, these (WTC 5, 6) explosions were "underpowered," and left much outer structure standing, and she was far enough away from WTC 2 to be able to run away from the area and survive. There will be lengthy discussions on the uniqueness of what happened to WTC 7 in later chapters. F/{lllll1iHJ btllfior c-0/umns ft om the caHilps• of wro 2 fl!fl/nlJ en the soul:hem part of wro .!J.

Fig. 5.WTC 3, on the right, the 22-story Marriott Hotel, may have also had a nuke vaporize most of its top floors, or this one may have been destroyed by falling debris. Let us analyze this. A picture of WTC 3 after the first WTC 2 collapse, but before WTC 1 collapse, indicates WTC 3 may have had its own "underpowered" internal nuclear spherical blast wave damage it, a la WTC 6. The final state of WTC 3 reveals about three floors remaining and does not show the massive parts of WTC 2 that allegedly fell on WTC 3. Fig. 6. WTC 3, later on. Did the nukes going off in WTC 2 vaporize these chunks before they hit WTC 3? Did the nukes of WTC 1 cause the outer shell of WTC 3 to later vaporize? Did after-collapse nukes do this? Should we call these "cleaner nukes" in analogy to how the regime sends in its "cleaners" to remove evidence after one of their agents has performed some nefarious deed? But certainty is not attainable here, and massive falling tower debris remains a possible destruction mechanism for WTC 3. Fig. 7. WTC 3, still later. Now I must include some related and important issues. Were deep underground nukes set off a few seconds before the start of visible "collapse," as audio and video indicates?7 This would be in addition to sub-basement nukes that I assert were exploded when the tops experienced the "plane hits" early on.

Flflllre 3-fl

11emaf11S oflYTC 3 atfsr 0011apse ot wrc 11111d wrc t.

Now what happens if a large flux of neutrons, gamma rays, pressure, heat etc. reaches another, unexploded, redundant mini-nuke? Will the latter -24-

The Nuclear Destruction of the World Trade Center and The China Syndrome Aftermath ©Anonymous Physicist

still go off somewhat as planned-Le., have its own chain reaction-or will it fizzle? If it goes off, what percentage of its maximum potential will be realized? Would it at least be interfered with and compromised, probably to a significant level? Or could it have been sufficiently shielded? Is it not likely that only non-interfered, or "virgin" nukes would be used? The perps would want to have things go, as much as possible, exactly the way they want. Unlike conventional charges which could have one trigger the next etc. I would imagine that the placement of mini-nukes would be such that one would be out of the range of affecting the next one, if.possible. But was this possible? We need to examine this matter of "left-over" or redundant nukes that may have been "compromised." What if some nukes, maybe even one or more final "cleaner nuke(s)," destroyed the integrity of the shielding of "left-over" (redundant) nukes? It is indeed possible that sub-critical fragments-radioactive fissile material-then released significant energy for some time. Note the "nuclear glow'' seen in the CNN footage is sustained for some time, as the camera pans away from it. Is this glow like the "tickling the dragon's tail" experiments-performed at Los Alamos.?s Massive visible blue light emission-as well as neutrons and gamma rays-resulted when criticality was attained in this limited fashion. And there could have been several unexploded nukes "left-over" in each tower. Or even a single nuclear device could have had its components blasted to several locales. The above discussion of possible interactions of pre-planted, mini-nukes leads to the matter of the outer structure demolition. With this aspect, there may well have been interacting conventional explosives. But before we delve into this, it must be noted that what we are allowed to see is for public consumption. What happened inside was not directly observed-with the possible exception of some events like the "nuclear glow" that shone through. For completeness, we must realize that the videos and photos promulgated of the outer destruction of the two towers may be doctored. The regime wanted to make it "plausible" that a rapid, pseudo-free fall, pancaking occurred. People who have analyzed the public videos of WTC 1 and 2 outer structure "collapses" /demolitions report a 10 floor per second "collapse." This is presumably for that first second. I note that this is much faster than simple, gravitational collapse would allow in that first second-16 feet vs. 100 feet. This again indicates a non-gravitational event. After the initial "collapse" has started, dust and debris and other buildings soon obscure things. Those right there videoing had to stop and leave as fast as they could. But if the times for total collapse of the towers are about 10 or 11 seconds, and we have about 100 floors involved-as I am not counting separated top parts of the towers which seem to be disappearing shortly after initiation of final events. Thus we apparently have an approximately constant outer floor demolition rate of about 10 floors downward per second throughout. This constancy itself is proof that explosions, not gravity caused the downward destruction of floors. We need to examine the possible mechanisms for this and how this outer structure demolition dovetails with the inner, nuclear demolition hypothesis. Were pre-planted conventional-or even tinier nukes?-used to blow out the (visible) outer structure of each floor while the inside was being vaporized with nukes? Did these presumably outer building conventional explosives interact with each other, or the nukes? One possibility is that an explosive in the outer structure of the floor above reached, and then triggered, the explosive in the outer structure of the floor just below it, and so on. (See below for how a nuke's yield would cause successive floors to destruct.) Could these charges have been -25-

The Nuclear Destruction ofthe World Trade Center and The China Syndrome Aftermath ©Anonymous Physicist

placed in or at the outer structure shortly before 9 / 11/01, or even when the buildings were erected-for those who know "ultimate truths"? There are so many possibilitiesincluding a visible (yet "disconnected") "standard" demolition for the outer structure. But always remember, my central hypothesis here is that the towers were demolished primarily by hidden, internal, nuclear devices. The outer structure demolition events were created-or "enhanced" -for public consumption and "plausibility." One could even argue that this issue is a side-show to distract from the nuking of the towers, and likely several other WTC buildings. My hypothesis for the WTC tower bombings also has conventional explosives being used as cover for more massive damage done by simultaneous nuclear devices. I assert that what was happening inside-nuclear detonation(s)-caused the collapses, regardless of what any outer explosions did. This may even be consistent with the towers' demolitions actually beginning with the large explosions-apparently in the sub-basements of the towers-recorded several seconds before the visible "collapses" began near the tops. In the final analysis, I assert-as per the above detailed nuclear mechanism-that even if there were no outer structure explosions, the outer structure would have "peeled away" anyway because of what was occurring inside. Now this video-which also fits the geometry of the situation-is one of the clearest of the initial destruction of WTC 1, and appears to fit a nuclear demolition only.9 This video, if genuine, indicates that a central, nuclear, spherical blast occurred at the central level of the "plane hit"-about the 98th floor or so. Now imagine many lines-representing blast energy-radiating away from this central nuclear bomb at the same time. The shortest distance-or time-to the outer structure occurs along the horizontal level with the bomb, which is, as per the above, about the 98th floor. This can also be imagined as a sphere inside WTC 1 whose horizontal diameters just touch the outer surface of the tower at the 98th floor. Next to reach the outer structure would be the radii just below and just above this floor. Again, the next radii after this to simultaneously reach the outer structure would be two floors below and two floors above this 98th floor. Thus we would have succeeding downward exploding outer floors at the same time that we would have succeeding upward exploding outer floors. This is visible in some videos! But smoke, and debris quickly obscure things. As the visible "wave" of exploding outer floors travels downward, the top piece of WTC 1 accordions into itself and vaporizes. This upward accordioning rate appears to be at the same rate as the rate below the "hit" level. Also, gravity would not have much effect on these rapid explosions if the 10 floors (100 feet) per second "collapse" rate for that first second is accurate. So a separate nuke for destroying the top pieces, may not have been needed-but one could have still been so emplaced and been activated. The nuke used at "collapse" initiation was sufficient to both vaporize a significant part of the tower both below and above the "plane hit" level, and the video shows this. As above=> this nuke had a diameter of about 30 floors, and at least two more were needed and used, not counting any cleaner nukes. Also I believe "extras"redundant nukes-were in place at points along the height of the towers, and near the base for use, if the primaries fizzled. Summary and Conclusions

This work has attempted to elaborate on how nuclear devices demolished the WTC towers, and to explain related phenomenon observed at that time, and afterwards. While the immense complexity, removal of evidence, and alteration of evidence makes certainty quite impossible, the above analysis indicates the following scenario may be the most likely. Bogus plane hits (perhaps accompanied by genuine plane/missile fly-bys) were really -26-

The Nuclear Destruction ofthe World Trade Center and The China Svndrome Aftermath ©Anonymous Physicist

explosions of pre-planted conventional bombs (thermite, thermobarics, etc.). Shape charges simulated plane outlines. After a certain amount of time for-the bogus claim ofmelting the steel support, the towers were demolished with internal nuclear devices. The same was done to other WTC buildings with concomitant EMP evidence. The demolitions began in each tower with a nuclear device going off at the "plane hit" level. The geometry and the video evidence indicate several more were used per tower, and that a cleaner nuke may have been used at the end. This sceanrio also provides a plausible explanation for the remarkably high temperatures and molten steel, observedlO for weeks and months after 9/ 11, at the WTC. Just how all the emplaced nukes gave rise to the China Syndrome of high heat generation at the WTC, after 9/11 will be detailed in Part II. The nukes used could have been pure fission, or a fission, and fusion combo. The Finn believes a pure fusion device was used. Later chapters herein will reveal that the Tritium data released to the public may have been a red herring to claim there was only fusion, and not fission, and hence there could not be a China Syndrome. William Tahil's research at nucleardemolition.com, makes an excellent case that there was fission. When everything is considered, I assert that fission was a certainty, and that fusion probably did not occur. Some fission reactions even produce tritium-ternary fission. The author hopes that this discussion will initiate comments, corrections, improvements, and much needed discussion and action. It is hoped that people never forget that this horrific event was nothing less than a wanton, nuclear holocaust perpetrated against nearly 3,000 people by their own so-called government. And it was used as an excuse to murder countless more thousands, or millions, of human beings who had nothing to do with the events of 9/11/01.

References: I .http: //www.saunalahti.fi/WTC 200 l / soldier5.htm 2.http: //users.dickinson.edu I ~history/product/ steele I seniorthesis.htm 3.http://www.911research.com/wtc/evidence/videos/docs/squibs and streamers.mov 4.http://drjudvwood.com/articles/DEW I dewpics/Image 140.jpg 5.http: //www.91lresearch.com/wtc/ evidence /videos/ docs/towerl dust cloud afterglow. ~

6.http: //graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812 WTC GRAPHIC/911 0048.PDF 7 .http:/ / www .you tu be.com I watch ?v=jAKfBA81BY g&mode=related&search = 8.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis Slotin 9.http://www.91lresearch.com/wtc/evidence/videos/docs/n tower lst24.mpg 10.http: //www.youtube.com/watch?v=8X5F5PttzJY

-27-

The Nuclear Destruction ofthe World Trade Center and The China Syndrome Afiermath ©Anonymous Physicist

Chapter 5

Where in the World is Felipe David? And is he a Survivor (Hopefully) of Nuclear Radiation? On 9 / 11, Felipe David, employed by Aramark Corp., was checking or replenishing vending machines in one of the basement levels of WTC 1. Curiously Aramark Corp has Thomas Kean-Chairman of the 9 / 11 Commission-as one of its Board Directors since 1994. fiollo"_"-"_·n_g ,_· s SU pposenlv before the first plane "hit."

~ Th __ '-.,..

VV I

·-

_ _ _ .1..

.&.

__ -

- - -,.,t

H"Pl-inP 'c J:-'"" nau-irl v V

..._

""'.&..&.

..._,\A.

..&.\.,..&.

!:lf'V'r'llln+l nf' \A..'""'-"'-' \....L.L.I. ''-J'.L

"tXT'h a+ VV .L.L\A..L.

'h ".:l"t"'\"t"'\oP"t""I ,prl .L.L