The Massorah: Compiled from Manuscripts; Alphabetically and Lexically 9781463231224

Citation preview

T h e Massorah

Kiraz References Archive

19

Kiraz References Archive intends to keep valued reference works from the nineteenth century and earlier in circulation. This series will include reference works that have made an impact on the historical understanding of the present day, and which, despite their age, have continued to be utilized by scholars.

The Massorah

Compiled from Manuscripts; Alphabetically and Lexically

Volume 3 Christian D. Ginsburg

2014

Gorgias Press LLC, 954 River Road, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA www.gorgiaspress.com G&C Kiraz is an imprint of Gorgias Press LLC Copyright © 2014 by Gorgias Press LLC Originally published in 1880-1905 All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise without the prior written permission of Gorgias Press LLC.

2014

ISBN 978-1-61143-319-7

ISSN 1937-3287 Reprinted from the 1880-1905 London edition.

Printed in the United States of America

Preface.

Sinee the publication of the second volume of the Massorah which completes the text, a number of important MSS. have come to light containing new Massoretic materials. These I have carefully worked ont and printed in this supplementary volume. From the enormous range which this critical apparatus .covers it was impossible for it to be written down in the margin of any single manuscript of the Bible since the Massorah exceeds the text The scribes could therefore only pnt down a part of it in every page, proportioned to the sum which the individual or community who engaged them to produce a codex agreed to pay. The portion thus selected depended either upon the idiosyncrasy of the scribe or upon the model codex which he copied.1 For these reasons there is not a single US. of the Old Testament which contains the whole Massorah: and hence it is that every MS. which comes to light, and especially if it happen to belong to a different family, may contain some Rubrics which are not to be found in the other MSS. It is therefore to be expected that with every fresh MS. some new portions of the Massorah will be reclaimed. As other MSS. will in course of time be discovered, I hope to be able to examine them and periodically to publish the newly-acquired materials in a sheet or two which the possessor of this work will be able to bind up with the supplemental volume. I shall be obliged to scholars who will call my attention to any Rubric which they may discover in any MS. unknown to me and which is not contained in my edition. To Professor Strack of Berlin, the learned editor of the S t Petersburg Codex of the Earlier Prophets, I tender my thanks for giving me the copies of the three fragments of Massoralis from MSS. at Tzufutkali in the Crimea. I am only sorry that he made it a condition that I should print them entire, since this necessitated my printing some duplicate matter. The student however will thereby be enabled to see the portions and arrangements of the Massoretic materials adopted by the scribes of even the same school for the Biblical MSS. which they produced. It is with great regret that I have again to revert to the remarks of Drs. Baer and Delitzsch. As Professor Delitzsch feels aggrieved at my rejoinder aaid now declares that his notice of my work was meant to be complimen'o/y, I subjoin a translation of the passage in extenso, whioh is as follows:—

1

Tlw u m e praetice Hju obtained even to the present day by the different

which are thns palmed off as the Massorah. I cannot too strongly deprecate

Editors of the printed Hebrew Text; with this exception however, that whilst the

this practice, inasmuch as it misleads the stndent, who naturally believes that

ancient Hebrew seribe confined himself to what were really parts of the Massorah,

in the marginal notes to the printed text of the Hebrew Bible he has the aettial

modem Editors have inserted notes, some of which are Massoretic, whilst others

Massoretic language, whereas most of it really exhibits an arbitrary selection

are, nothing mora than the opinions and language of the respective Editors

from the opinions of later Hebrew Grammarians.

PREFACE. a "Though from hit youth himself a Massoretic scholar, Baer did not negleot to consult the immense and splendid work of Christian D. Ginsburg entitled

Th« Mattorah,

compiled

from

manuecripti

alphabetically

and

legsUatiy

arranged

the first volume of which

appeared two years Ago (London 1880, imperial folio). Baer found little which he could use for the recension of the text of Daniel, Ezra and Nehemiah; nor are there wanting thugs therein to which be took exception. In enumerating the variations between the Orientals and Occidentals,

soys that whilst the Orientals write

Gmsburg

as one word, the Occidentals write it in two words

Sg JV3. It is questionable where he found this difference. It is also questionable where he found the difference with regard to the words mOTXn »"lOpfma >7vbl. Even if it be true that there is a difference between them about these words, we suspect that he has inverted these authorities. For the Babylonian Codex which follows the authority of the Orientals does not write ^fcfPS as one word but n'9 in two words (Jerem. XLVIII, 18; Hos. XII, 5; Amos V, 6 &c.)- We also learn from in the habit of reading

CkuMn

66a that the Orientals were

in two words (nn2). Nor can we help disagreeing about Pt> 09 (Exod. XVII, 16) since it is not

the Occidentals, but the Orientals who write

as one word but read it as two words as we see in the Babylonian Massorah on

Isa. JtXXVI, 4. Furthermore to confine ourselves to those points which relate to the. books of Daniel and Esra the statements on p. 161, col. 1 concerning the Chaldee name for gold fDp 3TITI flfTD 3?lTt fOp 31^ HAD 3CPJ

p. 804, col. 2 concerning Ityi and

And the remark on p. 206, No. 90 Cj^K i o n 133 Sj^K 3TD «A are not correct. We cannot accept them at least in this form as genuine precepts of the Massorah." In the Preface to the second volume of the Massorah, I complained that these strictures are designed to mislead the readers of Drs. Baer and Delitzsch b y ascribing statements to me ("GKnsburgius ait") which are not mine but those of the Massorah, and remarked that Dr. Baer evidently thinks that I have edited the Massorah according to the principles b y which he is guided, viz. to alter the text wherever it does not harmonize with preconceived notions.

Of this mode of editing MS. Massorahs on the part of Dr. Baer, I gave a few out of many

examples. For these Unjustifiable alterations I distinctly held Dr. Baer responsible, and stated that I should not have taken any notice of the above remarks had not Professor Delitzsch given his imprimatur to them.

Taking the

Professor's own declaration that Dr. Baer had Worked at the MSS. and had furnished the Massoretic materials, I said *:It is greatly to be regretted that this excellent scholar (i e. Prof. Delitzsch) should thus have taken u p a branch of literature which lies outside the sphere of his knowledge". In the Preface to the edition of Ezekiel which has just appeared, Professor Delitzsch resumes the controversy and as his reply appears to me very remarkable, I subjoin it translated in extenso. * "In the Preface to Daniel and Esra-Nehemiah we made honourable mention of Ginsburg's Massoretic work, the first volume of which had just then appeared, censuring however some errors in a modest and frank manner, as being aware of our own faults. Nevertheless the Rev. Gentleman assails me somewhat bitterly, and even reproabhes me with inexperience in the Massorah, forgetting that I have been an associate and fellow-worker with Baer's labours in these subjects for nearly thirty years past. As to Baer himself, he had already devoted himself for sixteen years to the investigation of the Massorah, when I first made use of his labours. He (Dr. Ginsburg) accuses Baer of arbitrarily altering the text. Now he alters nothing in the received text, without inserting either the Massorites and Grammarians or the MSS. and the rules which he follows so that every one is able to judge for himself. He in turn continues to deny that Ginsburg is right in inserting ^KJVJl written as one word among the Oriental mode of writing. We are

3

ctijns YÒI. I Abitine biennJum prodiit (Londini 1880, Fol. Imper.), Baerins quamquam ipse ab ineunte adolescenza atadiis masoretieis imbatti» eonsnlere non neglexit, attenuo panca invenit, quae In Daniella Esrae Nebemiae tasto recensendo in urani rana conrortere poiset, neqae deerant, in qaibus offenderei: Differenti*« Orientalinm et Occidentalium enumerali« Giosburgius ait, Orientale* Swvi taoquam unum TOcabaloni ncribere, Occidentale« separatim SK Quaeritur, ubinam aie eoa discrepare invenerit Eadem quaestio auboritur In vocabtilis nwwn .lavoro Etiamsi veroni sit, extere in bis Titroramqne differentiam, •nbit tamen sospicio, eum aucloritates permutavisse. Nam Codex Babylonieus, qui

anctoritatem Orientelinm sequitar, non seribit, sed mi (Jer. 48, 18. Hoc. 12, 6. Am. 6 et saepius). Eosdem Orientales *ra tanquam duo voeabula (nna) seribere eo&raerisse ex Chulîm 66 a cognoscitar. Etiam de D| Ex. 17, 16 non potsumos quin dissenliamus. Etenim non Occidentales, sed Orientales scribunt S'O?, ita tamen ut Tocem non divisant nt duo vocabula legant, id quoi e Babylonien Masora ad Jee. 86, 4 intelligitur Praeterea ut eontineamus nos io ets quae ad libros Daaielis et Esrae apectant non recto se babent quae p 804, col. 2 de MW et mn, quae p. 161, col. 1 de nomine auri chaldaico! fop arm nna ann fop am nns am, quae p. 206, no. 90s ana vuh ^H ion m leguntur Quae quidem sic reddita pro genoinisMasorae praecepiù babere non possumus. Libri Danielit, Emu et Nehemiae. Praqfatio, p. Y, VI. Lipsiae 1882.

1 In praefatione in Danielem et Esra-Nehemiam operis Ginsburgii masoretici, cujns tomua primus tura prodierat, bonorìficam mentionem fecimus, ita tamen ut nonnulla tam modeste quam ingenue, nipote nostroram ipsorummet errornm memore», reprehenderemus Nibilominus Tir reverenda» aeerbias in me invehitùr adeoque imperi tiam rerum masoreticarnm mibl exprobrat, non reputane, me abbine triginta fere anni» bis in rebus Baeriaiiorum studiorum socium etpartìcipem esse;

ipse autero Baerius, qunm opéra ejus uti inciperem, investîgandae Hasorae jam per sedecim annos inenbuerat Accusât Baerlum, quod ad arbitrium textum reficiat; at nibil textus recepti mntat, qnin sive Masoretas et Graramaticos sire codices sire praecepta quae sequatur inraedîoposât, ita ut sao quisque jodicio stare queat Viciasim negare pergimus Ginsburgium ^MOS ' ono vocabulo seriptom jure seriptiooibus Orientalïum inseruisse Etiamnunc affirmamus, indieem XXVIII

Etto» ingeot •pleadidnmqne Chriititni D. Ginsburgi opus inseriptum

The Mattorah,

compiteti /rota ManutcripU

alphabtticaUy

and lexically

arrangtd,

PREFACE. still of opinion that the 28 passages with Pitka given by ns on Hos. I, 1 are based upon a long-continued and close investigation of the Massorah, a fact which he himself (vol. H, p. 449, § 186, 187) could not disavow. Surely no one can deny that the list given in the Erfurt Codex I is confused though it is correct in about 14 passages. Finally he finds fault with Baer that in copying the Hassorah on Ps. I l l , 7 which states that the ancients prescribed

the rule about the writing of n i a ^ l .lfj^fl &c. he deliberately

omitted the words DTUIB D'1SD3 ¡'13 KJK n T O f K «Si and this he did deliberately addition of a scribe.

because the words Jfc. question are the

Besides, the old rule does not cease to be binding because there exist codices whifti though corrected

do not follow it."

It will be seen that in this "honourable mention" of my work, these scholars ascribe statements to me which are those of the Massorah, that they question whether I found these statements any where, and insinuate that if I have found them at all, I have inverted my authorities. This charge I naturally resented and not only referred to the Massoretic Rubric, but gave the MS. chapter and verse and the folio of the codex from which I printed the Massorah. I had therefore a right to expect that Professor Delitzsch would at the very least recall this charge against me and declare that the Massorah is wrong. He however has not done this, but, as will be seen from the above continues to say that I am wrong.

Of course it is an easier matter to exhibit this difference of opinion as

existing between him and me than between him and the Massorah, and the learned Professor hag adopted the easier course.

Hence Professor Delitzsch takes no notice whatever of the fact that the Massorah which I printed (vol. H,

p. 713, § 634) lays down this rule, but persists in ascribing it to me. In the Preface to the second volume I also pointed out that Dr. Baer pronounced the list of the "Divisional breaks in 'the middle of a verse" in the Erfurt MS. "very corrupt and mutilated", and without stating wiiere the corruption lies, substituted quite a different list, and I gave the two different lists in parallel columns. But all that Professor Delitzsch has to say to this remarkable proceeding is that "no one can deny that the list given in the Erfurt MS. codex I, is confused, though it is correct in about 14 passages". With all due deference to Drs. Delitzsch and Baer I maintain that the list is not confused, but is perfectly correct according to the particular school of Massorites from which it emanates, and I aver that these learned Drs. ought to have exhibited it faithfully as it is in the MS. and then have 'suggested any corrections they chose, thus affording the^student an opportunity of judging for himself as to whether he will accept the Massoretic list as given in the MS. or that of Drs. Delitzsch and Baer. As to the declaration that the list which they have substituted is "based upon a long-continued and close investigation of the Massorah", I can only say that nothing short of references to the folios of the MSS. on which this list is based, can justify such a proceeding.

My long-continued and close study of the Massorah has convinced me that of (he

hundreds of MSS. which I have collated, there are not two which exhibit the same nuinber of breaks. Of this I gave a convincing proof by publishing, besides the list in the Erfurt MS., three lists of these Divisional Breaks, as exhibited in the texts of three Standard Codices; from which it will be seen that they not only differ among themselves but are at variance with the list compiled and substituted by Drs. Baer and Delitzsch for the one given in the MS. Professor Delitzsch's excuse for the garbled and mutilated form in which Dr. Baer has published the Rubric from the MS. now in the British Museum is very remarkable, and we venture to say will not be accented by critical scholars. Any one who will impartially examine the Rubric in question as it is literally printed in my second volume of the Massorah (p. 297, § 533) will recognize at once that it has been formulated by the later Massorite who finished it with the words DTD10 C H B D 3 p~D »ON JTTDPN t & l but I have not found it so in the most correct codices, since the phrase D'OIOlpn U p n , the aneimts have decreed, is not the language of the earlier Massorites. Moreover this phrase clearly shows that the writer was not a mere copyist, but a Massorite who, as he himself tells us, had carefully collated "Correct", "Model" or "Standard Codices" which is the meaning of DTtJlB D'~IBD and not "Corrected Codices" as Professor Delitzsch will have it. To print therefore the Rubric and to suppress the positive statement made by the rubricator himself that the Rule in question is not recognized in the "Standard Codices" is a

loeorum piskntorum, qaem ad Hos. I, 1 exhibuimns, longa subtiliqne Masorae perscrutatane niti, id quod ipse in operi« n i tosi. II, p. 449, §. 186, 187 intnens diffiterl non potent; etenim iadicem, quem Cod. Erf. 1 coatinet, perturbatimi esse qnis est qui negare possit, tiintumniodo de XIV fere loci» non fallitur. Denique Baerio objicit, eum in MM ora ad Ps. 3, 7 exscript», quae scriptionem n m i

et simili uni a Yeteribus praecipi testatur, verba estrema onBDa K3M rvnjB'K •'mio consulto omìsisse Utique consulto, quia librarli additanientum aunt atque insaper vetas illud praeceptum non labefactatur eo quod exstant codices,

qui, licet emendati, ei non obsequuntur Liber JCzerhielig. Praefatio, p. VII. Lipsiae 1884.

PREFACE. flagrant violation of the primary duties wliieh devolve upon a conscientious editor. And be it remarked that Drs. Delitzscli and Baer

1 not indicate in tlie moat remote manner that they had omitted any tiling. Who can tell what remarks

" f i r s . Delitzscli and Bacr have omitted from other Massorahs because they may have deemed them as proceeding from n later wrif&r? I am exceedingly sorry that Professor Delitzscli should take my defence of myself as a bitter attack upon him. My great veneration both for his person and his vast erudition would ever prevent me from assailing liim even if I had cause for it. When I said that "the Massorah lies outside the sphere of his knowledge" I meant an independent Rtudy of the Massorah as contained in the MSS. themselves and not as served up by Dr. Baer.

After many years

of study and collating the different MSS. iu and out of Europe, I can confidently say that without liavitig carefully worked through the large and very important collections of MSS. in the Bodleian Library at Oxford, in the University Library at Cambridge, and especially the MSS. ill the British Museum, no one can compass the vast range of the Massorah. How absolutely necessary this is and how easily even such Massoretic scholars as Drs. Delitzscli and Baer may fall into a mistake by not having carefully studied even the printed editions of the Hebrew Bible, let the following illustration suffice. In the Preface to Drs. Bacr and Delitzscli18 edition of the Massoretic text of Isaiah, Dr. Delitzscli makes the following declaration:— ' " O f all the editions this is the first in which each section of the text which tradition has sanctioned is indicated by the letter D

DQinD) and D ( = nmnD). Hitherto the editors of these sections have been right in the Pentateuch only, and that by following

Maimonidea ( m i n 1DD

cap. VIII). In the other books, being without certain rales, tliey follow their own opinion, and hence

differ widely amongst themselves. But Hupfeld with good reason lias observed in his Grammar § 19 that similar divisions in the text of the Prophets and Hagiographa seem also to have been handed down by the elders which the Mishna with the Gemara (MegiUa 24a) demands and the MSS. confirm. These sections whether closed or open we have here endeavoured to restore."

Without pajusing to discuss whether tlie passage referred to in the Talmud really denotes the Open and Closed Sections, and passing over the fact that the model codices in the British Museum which have the letters in the text of the Prophets and Hagiographa to indicate these sections, essentially differ from the Divisions adopted by Drs. Delitzsch and Baer, the assertion that theirs "is the first of all the editions" wherein the letters in question have been introduced into the text is incorrect. In the edition of Isaiah and Jeremiah published at Lisbon 1492 these letters are inserted throughout the text to indicate the Open and Closed Sections. Not to know everything and to make mistakes is human and pardonable: to omit designedly and to alter passages when professing to edit MSS. is unfaithful editorship and unpardonable.

' Et omnium edltionnm haec prima est, in qua »¡ugnine textus scctiones, qaaj tiadiilo sancivit, literie e (h. a noinD) et s (h. nmfle) designates sunt Editores hnensqaa earum sectionum in solo I'cntateuclio rationem tiabuerunt Paatatauebo rationem habuerunt idque duce Uainionide (nun ISO nii^n eap. Till); in ceteris libri* certis praeceptia destituii sunm arbitrium sequuntur

ideoque nimirum longe inter sese dîssentiunt. Merito autem Hupfsldui in g 19 Grammaticae suae obserravit, etiam in Prophetis et Hagiographie similem textus ]*artltionem a majoribus traditam videii, id quod MUchna cum Gemara Mer/iUa 24a postulat et codices confirmant. Has Parasclias sive clauses sive apertas redintegrare studuimus. Liber Jetaiae, Prarfatio p. Vili Lipsiae 1872.

CHRISTIAN D. GINSBURG. Holmlea, Virginia Water, St. Ann's Heath, Chertsey August 1, 1SS5.

niœu n i D D u o r a n o o v i o e i n i n t n' fp S n b $ £»k.

xuii

i»

IV

1

«VII

i

1 Cbron. Pro*.

^

XXI

17

Jonah

I

8

Jem.

L

A

!

?

N F R I ?

»

Jod».

XXI

M

V

i

XII

II

4

i m « san

p&ssa

.

>0

« i "

r r m x i K SK s i n

XXXI

s

XXI

«

XLV

1»

roa

b s

XL

II

Numb.

XVII

IS

P«.

xun

8

XXXVII

7

Ii

5

LH

7

XXXIX

4

vm

ì«

btfl

msa

N

«

3-> =

»8» ' 3

Pfc

Lxxxm

ì»

n i S m i Su m o o S

Job

VI

18

pei. Ss nnnpSi

SK

'p^ri

R J I K

ptpçn

n o n m »

«

=

H 3 » » ' 1

ipiSnan

iwa>

ISP> 0 3 n f i v r i K

incb>

»j« p.13B»Dl ' S a "3 1 5 «

W3.iv

XXIX

1.1

npSi

XXXI

19

xxvm

e

XXIV

li

naann aia pan

I I D O ' 1

nnon

ìiwi

aiw m »

«npi

' C S Ü O

nrnan S x

SKI

wwn tií"»

*

p®s fc

n

s

S

K 3 N

'S»

' S s a

S - J I K

1 3 1 K

3-B3 b s

V W

pvbbl

lö^i? Û W SK

I B I »

D I »

1 8am.

Í 1 3 1 3

. I K I K

Ita.

nifi' 1133 D 1 K 3 P

« a

bp nyi&i n j i ?

^

K-D3

bs

N A I A

S K I

nprj» I R E

p p n

S K

i n ; ?

na w w

p*s

i r « n i w n >bs bs rm T

«

I

N

Ç

Nob.

XIV

19

VI

11

p a n S vn O K

bs

bs

inpSi

p»S Sa

O

t Sam.

n i 3 ' '31B3 ® K n r

e '»oí

I A » K I

p»s

s p i

'Dn ' 3 V N

p

S » i v a » >:oS « i n a n i

b#

Mlcah Pro*. > San.

VI

10

XVIII

84

XIV

19

p ' a o '3 Vin n'a » R i

^

rea b s 1«

S'B»nSi panS O K O K

8 Cbron.

VI

27

1 Klnp

XX

88

P R T T .

V I I

551*

CP?Tl T H

^ 7 3

D ^ T J

1-DÏ» =

387*

n-pn =

sos

p®S Sa

-o'n ' l a i

u

-pS rran S K

l ü ' S n n ! B ' o a ' i c o t r - ì •} ^ N l LXIX

18

J T 3 » a T 3 B i n o n SKI

Olin '3

CXIX

49

na»

WDnn'l

CVLI1I




xni

i7

Jad(. 1 San. Jerom.

X

1

XLvm

i»

Pror.

vn

u

t Cbroa.

VI

17

la

pwS S3 I T S K

B'I

n o S n SK D >DÏI

LAS M A N n-n o w n

" p i

- > 3 0 1

I D O S

v b s

s

b t $

SK

»

Spn'

SKI

K*B3 xvm

j'spn =

523a*

b s

P^1?

IX

DJTW^

88

•'JIW^ nSjn

I 9

^ K K ' a a -V b s I Klagt

si*

' m o i

.

SK or» SK

pawn nnin

SKI

•pin p T

SK

S K

Sun

>

W - p i SK

n a »

» O B

LI

l a i o n - p i SK

ME» "PI

1 3 1

AOVAS K U N SKI

[ i n s

TP!

py

H'SK B ' 1

K-ipr = 551 h ">01 ^ H t*D3 b s

n»

D ' t n VK

orrató -papS nar

XXXVin

bv

3"Sn = 4 3 2 * b

p»SSa

Tarn

DniN^i

P K i ' n ' 'n

TOötn

K

p 3 » ' S p i n 3 |13'K1

r i t o SKI l a x » SK P ; I iTlJJ'WfJ

mpn =

(Jen.

O

S3 0 1 Ì K 3 03

ìaipm

N Ì O X P

onerai -jbon

b s

' B ' D I •Sa 'Ki v n 'x p

bs

i n Sk >jik'3'

il

i*

Ü

SK a i p n a i p n

1 «

IV

K

niMtp npttp

1 b s ro3

Numb.

Srjtp. '33 nK p o r n

t a r a n S K p u n n » Man

1

«

N

O M S K . I

^ ras bs

j-k

M .

JH"

SK-jipn i n n r i

X

3

I K I " I

t ° ' J 3 >33 p

b «

Jorom.

xLvn M Exod.

le

nSron

M I

rmaw p j w i i p n S ' n ' s i

I

.Triers« rmjiiK

Ï

3«

»

m i n t SK w o n M

nimica

1«

®^

1

ip»m c n S a n

K

Dott.

Job

XXXIt

ÏTI

SSvn pst

^

nienn

XIII

XXX v i n

Enk.

I ® K

w m m

f

«i

'3na3 rmxo

3

p»S

E J N A

Sa

1I11BB0 1 B K 1

2

3 II

,

Ho*.

1

b^rbs

a

1B0B

TO

t

w

vopn. = 5 6 6 b * winK eram

1-03 ^ • i ' K I b y b v

BD b z

^•tpnte Msina K»p3i

jv,iria

Tcpnn = 944* •>oi m

i r o a i oBTO

2

0»B3 3'Dpnn -

nob* mor o - i n

XLI

It

XII

8

Mil.

y ^ » ' n r o ® >IKI

13

ni

w a s tt

f s p r o 3 nriD

i > t o w bp p]h p i r n

XXII

17

xnp

>iK5 i p 3 1 » 'op 'TO 'ne « a l p

»i>311 T

'Hip

»1KJI

XXXI

7

u n a S.IK n *

XIX

7i

6

3 p r 10W K i p ' 3 i 1 1 B K 1

9

1 3 3 1 p 3 '31H K3 - f j '

Judg.

xvni

24

1WK ' n b x n x

xxv

39

XXX

16

xxm

17

1 Sam.

„

2 8am.

flBK

1131

XII

3

113V

K1W

msnnn = 1288

w n

6

n a n n Dsnna inp

SI

i n n H313 1®H ^ 3 1

24

rp3

XVIII 88

"J^B 1 3 » I B K ' l

VI 10

n>3 ' n x s >3in rino^i

XXVI 13

flDlin

BIB

' r o n i^o 13J6 n a i s bv •»03

rajH*!

7

Jadg.

XXI

19

Exod.

XII

87

r r h l ' ^ Kill riDD r o t

Josh.

xxn

28

T3'i>K l l B K 1 ' 3 . T i l l

Zeeh.

IV

2

1301^1Bi>l 13^ WKO

pF)-pi^3

Kamb.

iox>i

1X313133

27

rap

psrasnai

Hos. Ps.

II

15

XXXVII

It

II

8

XLII

6

„

Ps. Jerem.

p,i'3B'oi ' » ' 1 3 D 3 i m Hug.

B V A W I 1 » 3 ' .133

D i n pji»

B333i> ia>e> n n » i

Vinn >33,1 pb

iT^N D l ® 3 • p n nx -J»

.13B»K1 ,113m r 6 x

n

X

9

T1B33

XXII

14

oi»n

Gen.

[inpif; |inpe(j9

" = 10«

Job

w m

im

',11»*?

• V » ^K 11201 ' 3

p»a»i> m w

III 38

mi

B"pnn = 9 0 9 *

pri'iB'oi XX

im

TÖ&1im

" = 10» Drat.

'31

bnV blttv nm< 3 n n 3 n

XLUI

rrpk^ 3

K33.1 ( 3 ^

Oen.

bs

n a n n n x IJBB a n r o i

» 0 3 -si

ni.i> '3B^ m a m

n & n r r n «

•131' ¡ 6

6 nb'bn l a w i 6 nb>bn IBIPI T13'3 ^K

6

16

«

M^TTA

^Kin I B K ' l

16

VIII

poeri

VIII 13

XXXVI

l'B3

Numb.

m

>i> n W O T I B S ' l

2

XXXIX

Bli>»

XXXV

I!

z

Eiek.

7

15

XXXVIII

Jorem.

IX

-

i Kings

19

ISI'l

XX 41

-

Eiak.

XI

Dent.

1 8am.

XXX

T V 1 » 1 Klil K1BK i B

ItMO

Jerem.

'.1 r n r f

*|33 n * K3 n p

XXVII 83

i n j r r r ^ K3'

"DI n w u a

:

XXII

36

Nek. w i

Exod.

»sSitn 1 1 m m . T

„

Jerem.

« r i n n = 1883*

Pi.

37

XXXIV

w i »

,rnnri = »205*

Zeeh.

111 1 B * 1

XVII

Exod.

bs

1 B 0 T P n k*B3 TIN) p n b s K » n ' 3 n e n o JB'B

DeuL

10

piT3B>pi HIB) W 3 T> T P U T Gen.

1 Citron.

Exoi.

B 3 '3 " l i j U n

XXIII

'33^

n a » K n s i '3

p n j o ' D i TIB i m ' a p i n ' 3 13

OpiOK

rann = 846* TO

pruB'Di

m n r n = 1078* XXXVIII

B'n^K 1 3 » i m p

6K1B»] '03 1 6am.

|'3K l 6 l 'flTOW >3*1

m i

Ps.

14

'Jijfi

n'3-im = 1028»

IM.

III

ropnn = 966»

XXVIII

K31

821* piOD ' w m 'K

^D mpuM niraa

3 Cfaron.

1,1'^ XO 3 n 3 0 Y * » train c

ronn = 846*

oi^n D a r n

«A W o n » i ' o i j u w

,

|B 1 3 n j ^ t t r p n o i K ' S ' r a S31

XXI 12

962* p m a ' 0 1 ' 3 >tf

Gen.

2 Chron.

f t o n 313

8

XVII

LXXIII

= 711* b

„

XXXII 2»

n»

XXI

14

XXIII

88

fl»3

Lxxxvn

6

P'Si^l

1BD3

IV

11

XVI

14

mn opb TV nenn

oito

1.

VII

32

Dl»?

ISH.

XXXII

6

»1®

LXII

4

131W

4

TO w

TJIJ3

,

i

-

t r p SXLB' '33 1^3X' N33

IV

Kzek.

»

' 1 3 0 NX W I S I

VI

„

XXXVII

SI

1BK .13 0 . 1 ' S X 1 3 1 1

XL1II

7

' K 0 3 D i p a . . . DTK ( 3

XL1V*

„

.

XI.VIII

133 p

9

p i n t >330 » i p a . i

11

V

0

CXLV

13

Ulcab

$>3 ,1VT 1 0 « .13

Kiefc.

XXX

c

1^031 M M I S X .13

'SPIFF

P».

LIV

c

M M >b I T » O'NI>X ,13.1

»JPBA

„

XVI

11

M N '3»NN

XLV

16

i"3i m n a s r c n s ^ s i n

IRINPIP?

X

111

osnnaw ovsi

cjnnntp

LXVI

5

„

Nnmb. I«a.

=

" =

•'DI E D I N I B I N ¡'3I! '3 Dan.

I I D ' i n l XIO'OS h

D"T|JT

'33^

1 Cbron.

XII

2

' 3 ^ I ROW »3»

13

'38 ' 3 o n m

III

20

V

5

Mlcab n a n a

p»(>

XXXVI

•O'OI 3 .

• •

14

x u n XXXII

"¡pia

7V1 " p ' 3 n s n p . 1 ^ 3 0 npb

6

liTOTl

o>»3n n x i o»i33.i

10 etc.

n n i ^ OTW =

Ezek.

IM

,13pt rah

V

11

• W

LI

40

M3BI> 0 ' 1 3 3 0 T 1 1 X

ON;?

XXVII

21

N P ' S ' » 3 "?3I 3 1 »

ON??

XII

3

» ' P I N INT3 11.1?' 0 ' i " 3 » B i 1 1

0'3J135

XLVII

13

1'nx» 313 N'XB

D'33t33

n«

' 3 3 ' ^ l f f i l BX

n133J

7 N ' I N « 3 NO.131

NFAG

3 .TO =

I N I D I N 3"X P

DL3"0

XXVIII

|I3'XI

»5* •x p

Kxod.

I N P A N '3 N F O ?

minm

k i w i

*79«»

3

9

Den. Isa.

II'NPP?

LXXI

Jerem. ' N ' i p 3 '3 v i r i r i ?

NX I P N

=

¡1»i> i>31

»58*

S3

•

P S

r> Pe.

'NRI? 'nnpa

, 1 ' f W B 1^3K1 13K1

fe

Prov.

Jarem.

B93

V

453*

m n

T i l 0 » i l ' , 1 K1,1

XXXVII

ORII» DflK K 1 3 =

D9

13

Esek.

17* ran

lpD3 W O T ,13

XI

Cent.

TO K - D 3 V I TO W O N Sam.

5

o n w '33^> trmb

« f a * -ns

i

V

x ' 0 3 1 1 3 1 n i V r i n IDD i o i

lea. J-JTI =

io*

d'3,13^

375*

• MNPIPR

O ' L I N . I N I . T 1 3 1 I»AW N J N N P ^ A

p i T S ' 3 3 01*7,1 D'3n3.11

15

T W

1*8.

D^IS n 3 ' K

3

1 3

42

i 3 p n n B p.ibi3 1 3 ' 0 3 3 0 ORA i W i

' W ' I O ] '3'3 | 0 P31I '.1

.TB =

45* F"0P 1 0 ' L N I K I B ' O I'L.L i>3

Exod. Dent

XXIII

85

" J I 3 I d s v A k N W NX

Dni3jn

VII

13

NO Y N I - P I M 7 3 1 3 1

-PNKI

II

20

n s p b « . . •hs 7131

,13pbs

XXVI

15

VII

29

XXVIII

9

1 Sun.

K*B3 NNB " H p I K ® FAL Judg.

VII

S

»'»» "p = 'B'Dl bo

Dout. 2 Sun. Pi.

to -jenp p » a a t m n

-¡nm

•p3i i d » n x

XXII

0

n x >b n i K K3 ,i3i>

IS

^XIN

Job

V

21

K13' ' 3 11W8 K l ' i l >ii>l K13' e p n 1'3B^ K? ' 3

rawm

2

n n » a " p 3 0 mn> OR

. >rv

I

SI

f B 3 B TUP 0 1 »

10K1

ie 4

"P3» inm'B.1

XLI

5

K13' ' 0 1301 ^ 0 3 3 imp

'O'OI I3VK] 1 B ' B 3 ba si

Ki3' '3 n w a m - n k^i K13' p p n r j o S 16 ' 3

bp

XIII

16

i3n n®x

'3'pn

XXII

4

7 1 3 » "JFIKI'DN

,LI>N3

XL!

5

K13' >B 1301 ^ 6 3 3

.131»K13 N S L 3 0

Gen.

XXVII

SS

3p»> 1 0 » K i p '3.1

XXXIII

11

XXV

sx

'3

i p k '0313

„

'NON?

TBER =

1BK1

rot

K3 N P

rora.oA w o n *

Gen.

XXX

N

;A P I T

"T FA I N XXVII

41

"

n

bv 3 P » ' NX I ® » m

fin n i ' i

p»'i

®3'i

m n ' 1 3 1 3 1WN

O'lSO

26

XXVI

5

X

6

P ' l * » K l i > 111313

p'llt

20

n i 3 i 3 3 i m j i o x »>K

I>®p,-6

W N

bx'OI» n

•

Pa. •

xxvm

I

5

ipsfi nx

on»i

XXIV

10

r)'i>K1®',1 P

1J131

«1® =

TO

IA-P OAWI

RVTNA

XXI

7

NI3I3 INNWI '3

INNWI

LXXXIV

7

.133.1 p a » 3 ' 1 3 »

imn'®>

3 PRRB ' W t r [ 3 "B'Ol 3 " B 3 N M P 3 ' i 1 ® 3 » 1 3 1 0 » B 3 [ 3 i>31

t

XIX

'»'3»N I 3 W

19

W1X1 Levit

[TD"D

33**

k " B 3 N M P 3 -33 P|PIAI 7 1 0 0 N I I N S ® F 3 FE

B'¡in = +79*k

Pror-

T

V

S l K 3 • • • 0>W30 1 1 3 ( 1

SI

1 Chron.

ill*

21 XX

1».

=

24

Pror.

Gen.

bib

XIII

Job

•

i n i i 3 3 Ki3'

XXII

nroi

CXIII

Lerit

>i>»Bl 31'Nl f i A , i n te

LXXI

Job

V

to;

P».

Pi.

JNDG.

.T03 'on

nD>p»n

' 3 ^ 3 9 Numb.

1 3 b WIK 3 ' * n

no*

Jerem.

n

„ „ „

Ezek.

hm-cy!

'3?

363*

F'B3 B I N ^ I

N ' 3 I>KPTNI . T O T

bi

HI

21

XVI

„

14 15

' n OK ' 3 'U13TI

XXXII

32

I > K I » ' ' 3 3 RAN S 3 bv

30

O.I'NIMA

„

„ L

„

II

» A » 3 o " B ® bv

hyp

0 ' K 3 O ' B ' .13,1 P B

80

P10B3 ' 3

33

b x i ® ' '33 O ' p i w

4 3

031 -pirn

¡t»,in N » 3 1 0,1,1 B'B'3 NI>I® O I K P

>BX I A N

i Jan „ Eiok.

-¡Sip 2sb b rpo r a W b uosa a b XL 39 nbitnn nVinr [nini ? nnp b XVII 10 [' » io n nw pp] i m a toi a'*

:.xxvm s« »»

moo Tixpn prtpnn nj>mi jo ¡3W

¡rbo$

i

CXXV7II CXII .3 Sam. VU rroT. XXII

i f¿p mn 11a: nnm jro >a yo» Kin pp 310

4 S 2» »

na: 713* p 'a rrm p í a Smwi -pai ^Kin

XXI < na 'a 'ií> 'ja D'jron 1PJ31 i*> = n« i Drat. XXVIII 1< nvix n* mn> nno' XXI 7 ipru' o t p t pa b DTPfc? X s n w Vían mnn roa Visn XXI u Drrtyn im •XXIII It nroi pnK OIOP >33 fes'i *»oi t n a ttVl im V a w in pjit -n p in pim I Obren. pep rb pu urn b. HP» Pro». TI i n-n VTWÍ> '.TI b S Cbron. XXVI 11 181*0 b = so* I 11 i p r ^po 131 n w -ai 'fn b JwuL VP im» ns3B 03 b w p "ra 'a r f c o ? xn » Sad. vw OJJJV X 13 XXVI ra nVia: tbki Fror. noce D'pv r f e b XXIV < u t » nVia: XXvm u pnta n w naa* b Drat OVTÌP TP pro abra pvi ipnj> o r o pa b Job XXX i uri^n nnn iVn r* "jVrm b Ora. XXI 1* V » 10» Jadg. nmn nam b vr^fytspI im « i n '33K 031 b icTi^ipfin i 1 w i 3TO ríl^TJ r o a w n idh m i fe riVl^ r i ^ 1 Bu. •>01 -oip D«t. xxvn t niVi3 0'»K "|^ nopm yo » sí* •»DI "Or pwfe '3 KVI T*l 160 va ri^TTI s"03 3'ns n i ^ l ? i s i m v o i n^raj tai XXXIV u On. prrsffoi Bip •ob mn nom DJ?B5 .nSf NVTC JV130 m * n p 3 n ^ KVft OTO .i?TW .1W0 «i^'l ¿pbm N\in proo m iripa ri'bi

p*.

»

«

•

CIV CT evi cxni CXVI CXV1I CXXXV CXLTI cxLvn CXLVIII CXLIX CL

u u 48 9 19 1 11 10 10 14 « 6

rrm = 2*5» "O'di [D'bnn] to TOO io r> r r i ^ n ion' 113Ï3 •pi3 '3'W10 niixna 133 '3 1113 ^0'

rwp ló

DTI nwrí» no»3ii bs

re = 86* Job Lament

11»D1 www» Exod.

III 1

Exod.

XVI >4

I 1 = 3»

Jerem. Job

Lrrlt Ettbor

11 41 IX 9

p a n K ip3 p i -3 pn3i 11 Wlt'11 11

lu.

= 212«

DJH

'3"3P31 '3 IBS?

n n-í> = 38» -k jo 13 -von fe ri®oi pnK mSin ní>Ki mpo-bíji V jo i3 n?>o-n« r i x fei inn'31 nwo b» hm' ,ns imo

T311 113

XIX 8 III 7

spfhTnïpn KIB'D C)10 IS iwpn ITO [Ol

XIV 22--XXXIV SI

K*oa Y1! 'on vb fei "TWIIT 133 '33 VW OKI

LXII 8 n

1 = 10» XXII IS XXXVIII 81 36 XXXIX 12 20

,

'O'Dl ' ' f i s nn PWOBOI pi>0 (0 in n » 3 ninna nnx '3 b ^pnn no'3 ni3i»o b Hfprjo îaVi o'pi3 b nVtfiin "jpit ais" '3 is b poïifin ' nn3 u n n3iK3 b 13^'pnnn

n

p » ?

Ts. Prov.

XXVII

9

XXX

19

BSI [

TOP

BX

DI

' ' B ' O I D T>B

aipa w 'inni H C T

XXVIII

I

94

Kxod.

I

16

Zech.

XIV

4

»53i

Deut.

XXXII

14

Ezek.

XLVII

9

Sip'T

Zech.

• XIV

11

Eccl.

V

IG

Ecol.

IX

7

Judg.

• V

12

IX

17

' T b g n i ' f i n s '3V5??)

nipi ntyi

i

Ue» m

Oen.

''IM

^xiw

^>X1B' H B bz DK T 1 1 1 Chron.

T' =

T "

=125*

6

5

n

^

T m T H T B TW

N I D B N bs Judg.

1 ' J B "LFLDN

bt
3

Fio03 a n > a r u ' B O T 10KT " | 1 1 3 "IIP l U t t B •^iro-i

1 King«

XIII

34

XIII

1

1 Kings

vm

34

nn^Di

2 Kinga

»

36

ii3m

Jerem.

XLIII

13*

3 Chron.

VI

25

nnboi

Ezek.

xxvi

11

•

»

27

V

8

•o'm td b

anpni

is

' n i a i i a n x TRjt'T ^»3,1 m 3 x a n x

i3en

flü*8

D B 1 ' L'DTD ITT01B3

nüyoi

XXXVIH

28

Neh.

VI

19

3 Chron.

IX

28

IX

11

V

19

J'i3n n n x »>3®m

'90

I»a.

XLV1II

1

a p s ' n ' 3 n x t T»B®

W .

' Gen. Namb.

bs fTXl

o'xyiö

CXTCTB . . . v n v n a i ö NA

n-ain

B'XKID

?

N-O-IN O'LLTBB O'DTD w i 3 nx

D'XTIBT

'ncpm

bs

'99

Exod.

XXVIII

38

HMT

n»j

III

7

T3R> «i> i ) X 1 B ' fl»3T

n*o

XLVII

19

s 6 i iTrai jnt

fni

Jerem.

III

3

W I p ^ O l 0 ' 3 3 1 WIB'T

V

a

nSaxji p i

nnpii

xvm

X

VI

XV

W L

o

CXLIII

W ® »

I o n s ' 3 M 13f

n © n >xn n * n

1 Kings

9 14

VI

28

XXI

27

'BBTBT ? O B P B 3 l ^ i T 1'JOS p i S D>I>N3.I bv

n o t j

,TJ> =

'B'DT •:•} [ B n1(t

W 1 3 W ^ I Mit

,»p] ^

'j

n'TO

'3>» f i ' o w

"porm

Deut

XXVIII

37

1 Kings

IX

7

3 Chron.

VII

20

i>®ai> n o w i » i>xiw n-n

pn"?3

[ r y p = 174 w

IPIPÖ

a ' m n i . T - p o n »JX3'T

1TJ «

nx

n"m -

» »MSM

'NBIXIIB

[i-^nn -

327»

B'flWWT

8 3 5 tf n i x ( » n ]

n i x p ' p ] 'i

106b

TT:a>DI [ 1 3>DJ] CFFTN K V D i ' ^ a N P

339 K"ü3 i o n w n x

1

y i w i

^PIPO?

' n n t s a i i a r a >JXT

41

im

75»

[ f r = 407

-pana

12

e » x - J ^ T DX

3XRX P B ® 3 'ILT

b i

326

13

6

Prov.

xvm LXXXV

T r a i s a s i n x bs ' n o a : p r r t o i x t n

• n n o i i 3 T nb

B'J® = XXVI

p

Ps..

305

X ' B 3 bo CXIX

; Ezek.

1 ' 3 IARA

>1'3 O n x

xni

73»

p n ' J B ' B T ' 1 W p , T ® ' 1 3 1 • r j ( 0 p u r •»

9

3

p n x TOB

JD =

29i*

4

t*3® -

Hamb.

B'l^)

•Ezek.

'O'DL '3 i p i P D ? 1

Ps.

an®

.Timms

r m : n

-

.

» 1 » n T 3 u n o D ' i p i o Tai'

nittJi a n ^

nnbv

l ' n n o N U V l |iwi>

Ps.

l l ^

n:»a

'n x iwn

rr» =

Exod.

Jerem.

X

1113 D ' i w

8

0

Arnos

4

18»

fjl

Job

9

I.I

ffl

DIPQPQV

inx

XLIII

•nn =

Jerem.

IV

nxönb

p r w a ' D i 'j

Neb.

Lament Jerem.

1 3 ' e p r i N ^ n i>3i

niiwui nxtan^ i p k n x Y'op =

Gen.

iaia lipo

ii3m

14»»

BT^TPO

18

Zeeli.

(»nno i p

O'IFIPA

I>331F > 0 ' i i > x i » '

47

Jerem.

D'^C? Q'^Cipi Kl

V 3 3 ^>KT P N X BX 1 3 1

.

Job

o^ftB?

nanxi

XXVII

144*

i>xi®' i a » n x e n ^

bi ibwi

TT* o ' i > i > n a ORIKT

Deut.

pm'l

mn

« r r n ' n e » i 3 £3 ' 3 - 3 | ö p i t ' n

T I N « DPII

ptot!

p n i a o T r v i j i a n > i p a n n o 'i n t i B t f ^

Levlt.

70»

Neh. •

S

Tüp =

=

("jn]

107»

TOP =

I

nvt

•piOD TO p j ' X T ' 3 Dan

1 Kings

V3s6

xb

i n a mn p » [n*p =

Pp -

,13^1

nfraom Ol w

p

np^i

onsipi;

V

61«

bvs

DIITJ

3TB 3 ^ 3

mSpn

">m vn ros ba H1YJ bst tin DflTilO bs Prov.

InfO)

23 b *

n:af?

m m M"D =

2 King»

p n > n ' 7i

h b J"3 =

n

i t u i

h •b b h

ba

f'isn

Exod.

XYHI

PICO

i

21

'•FTN NS? >IJP

.1(171 n n w

23

N I P ! NTP N I P ' I I ?

nwo insn

a-sibn

-

R ^ r p 3TU1 = 492*

XXHI i - x x v n s a s nxp>a -ixidx n s a a bv

18 Ì T W

T I

[I.UOBI T I 'na i n i

ninna i p rntno^x m n («b i r a i

n p xnp'Dxio TIPI n a i p n a i » nw-iobx

OBI«:«

J7TI1T

»M P'nxic

ra

i n 'a

i

io

N ™

pina 1 ? IBX

vn

»

'H ™

n s i a m IDK>I

KBDK^X }0 i f n tRl> piDD

rran = »28» 'O'DI 'a ^IPNJI

'ni m n x i n a f e efribx p K.TBI G.„.

xxin

4

AJIJJ? '35« ALBINI 13

o a n a i w B3Ì> a r n s i

X^III 87

a y l n l jo nmoSn 1J |K

p TWB

2

% 6«m.

KQDK^K p TVl 1KV p'BKlB

a » n n o>XBI p « aprn

JWDÌO 1 S]W>K p K.TBI n j i p ? o'jprt i s y l i n ' l

>MJ1 = 451 •

«mn»

n-pu i i n r h n n m p > ; «

M

-finn' ULTI vbi

"ITE

pB

e««. 1 1 - v i 8 HP? [3B

n ; n n n i ^ i s i i?o n i p ^ n r t n ^ w 1,-ai

po

-in» t o n n n b v y

'^npj p i

e]ip^K n n n n w 1,131?^

iem

^nBi p i

W ^ »tnmp' p ò

Mnoo»»

ip

mn

pa

irsi

pìDB 1 S p Knp*QK1B

«M m n i o NOTO RJ^À^K p K,TBI Gen.

IH

S

HpK p T » -noia JJfl 1JHJ "Si f}3 T " 1 ? i m ^ W J P "'M" VI 9—XI 82 n 3

min

iinDx

noB3

'Vr

I j ^ J P

ninnx

np

ncno^K

PI »nenci

NNN P I P ? p

|KB

-IMI

p K.TBI

pnaVa sa.

vn

4

Dìp>ri b ? n * ' f i ' n p i

»mn»

Hf? pi1

T»B

nio^B

PÌ> ix

p 1 » i V i a B'^i

io

TISI

n;n

ltnF3K01

.Tnn p i r j

mn

KaoK^K p t V t W I ' pìDB ì l p Knp'BKIO

1VK p f i

13"! m i r r r i

nT3 d ' ^ i . T j t ì ? ^ n> n p ^ nr io n p j n «ito- p ò

reiB* a»nn

' t T^K

»«»»

n n n mjJa

«ipo V i NITBÌ' n n n B^> p i g m p TWB

f? 1 ? n " J

^

nrwb*

¡nn

ipx p^

Ipoa M.13K b p p i P 131" xxviii 1 0 - x x x n 3 a p 2 T •»dxib t w i iirtDK

ranu«

>bs ninni« n p

•"p^TI

x n ì - x v n 27

IOTI raneb*

m n ptB i r a i

j*»to^K n n i ó n ntó^K p G».

n n

p Y n w i > piDB r t ì p

zxx

1«

yyg) .rrpn p

mi

TJS p N P ' f i o

**

.

p&o n ^ n j i w i ^ k n n n mi ^

e^cpi

ninni»

np

xm

16

|3B

f a r i : b} so ntioio n * m p ' fiO

"l^K [3B

•poa WlJrtp' fK3

'SnB5 p i

XVIII 1 - , X X I I 24 K * T I

pò

xnp'DKiB m n pine ni hhbm n o o a •bv m n ™ i p "dì>k m n p s i r a i kod*S« p

«NNSUM

T i n a o»Si

QH

»mn«

T i p a n«t VTPrt ' 5

mn -ve*

oba 't r|W?K ¡a xìtbI

>̻NBJ p

nn( [K3

pB

XXII

8

*,TBI

n n n r

«ari» pino

muchi N

n ^ s n

MhptDtnfi t i p i n t o a e h o o k '3 òb n w w n p "b^k m n p O 1P31 mp^p

«rrei

p j j n b? nt« '5

n^j ^ x x x h 4 - x x x v i 48

u>ai

v n m n i n na^a «|W>k p G.n.

*ia y i w i ^ip> ( t u igttf p c ^tfj p

ps

K80IÓH p -^>1 n»0' pWB I 3 p «np'DKTB

JS rptJOCI i>ip' [K3

-IP« p B

n p t j p n v n-.'ia n'jKri'K niion pa bs "IBS' [K3

PI 'wni

•s» «nnnn S w

pi «nhtoem

nVton

K*3i

M

rkmrrbs mrbjrb* ni» bs ^

3"3)

•pirco ^Vi Vip' w i

3*3/

"Warn ipij pe

M

», 10

'tow pi iownm

vox rçippn n p ' fie

nwn "W. nrro n)tj'. n p ' fK3

0, 10

«rm» -ipy pe

t o ^ r nnn ™s T^'.mp' |ic ipij pe ropa