Speeches on the Reduction of Armaments, Prohibition of the Atomic Weapon, and on International Control

402 25 47MB

English Pages 120 Year 1951

Report DMCA / Copyright

DOWNLOAD FILE

Polecaj historie

Speeches on the Reduction of Armaments, Prohibition of the Atomic Weapon, and on International Control

Table of contents :
Speech of November 24, 1951
Speech of November 30, 1951
Speech of December 12, 1951
Speech of December 18, 1951

Citation preview

SPEECHE S BY





ON THE REDUCTIO N OF ARMAMENTS PROHIBITIO N OF THE ATOMIC WEAPON AND ON INTERNAT IONAL CONTROL

DELIVERED IN THE POLITICAL COMMITTEE AT THE SIXTH SESSION OF THE UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY NOVEMBER

24,

1951

NOVEMBER

30,

1951

DECEMBER

12,

1951

DECEMBER

18,

1951

SP EE CH ES BY

A. Y. VY SH IN SK Y On the Reduction of Arm ame nts, Pro hib itio n of the Atomic We apo n and on Inte rna tion al Control

Deli vere d in the Political Com mitt ee at the Sixth Sess ion of the United Nati ons Gen eral Asse mbly -No vem ber 24, 1951, Nov emb er 30, 1951, Dec emb er 12, 1951 and Dec emb er 18, 1951

TRA NSL ATE D

FRO M

THE

RU SSI AN

CONT ENTS Speech of November 24, 1951

• •

Speech of November 30, 1951

• • • •

Speech of December 12, 1951

• • • • • •

Speech of December 18, 1951

• •

• • •



••

5

• • • • • • • •

36

• • • • • • • • • • •

64

• • • • •

• • • • •

• • • • • •

• • • • •

• • •





• •



87

Published by the Informatio n Bulletin

Of the Embassy of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics 2112 Massachus etts Avenue, Washingto n 8, D. C. January, 1952

A. Y. VYSHINSKY

Speech i n t h e Political Committee Nove

e r 24, 1951

M r. C h a ir m a n , Messrs. D el eg at es : .... O L L O W IN G

th e d ec la ra ti o n o f th e · tT h re e' ' su b m it te d to th e G e n e ra l Assembly by th e U n it e d States, Britain a n d Franee, th e delegations o f these same co u n tr ie s introduced th e ir d ra ft resolution o n ''r eg u la ti o n , llimitation a n d b al an ce d re d u ct io n o f all a rm e d forces and all armaments." T h e re is n o d if fe re n ce between these two d o cu m en ts ei th er as re gards the principle u n d er ly in g th e m o r as re g ar d s th e su b st an ce o f th e so lu ti o n o f th e problem ra is ed . Both d o cu m en ts ar e d es ig n ed to serve