Southeastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 500–1250

Southeastern Europe in the Middle Ages stood at a crossroads of trade and crusading routes, within the sphere of influen

707 51 25MB

English Pages 0 [528] Year 2006

Report DMCA / Copyright

DOWNLOAD FILE

Polecaj historie

Southeastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 500–1250

Citation preview

· i\ 1vl I 1 lE ) I T E T T

I

r: v

E L

J...

Sout eastern Eure e

tn the M ·ddle Ages

5@0-1250

Cambridge MediC\·al Textbooks

This is a series ofintroductions to unportallt topics in medin·al histon· aimed primarily at ach·anccd students ~md t~Jculty. and is designed to complement the monograph series C1111hrid'>Ze Studies i11 .\ lediel' i.;;, or'' J!l rcnuin . .JCUlLttL' 01 approprute.

To Ana and Lucia

CONTENTS

List qf tnaps Acknow/edg1·nents Note on transliteration, Chronology List qf a!Jinel!iations

page vm IX

name~~

dates, and u;ords

rntroduction The end of Late Antiquity or the beginning of the Middle Ages (c. soo-c. 6oo)? 2 Southeast European "Dark Ages" (c. 6oo-c. 8oo) 3 The rise of new powers (800-900) 4 Iron century or golden age (9oo-rooo)? 5 The first Byzantine century (rooo-r 100) 6 The second Byzantine century (r roo-uoo) 7 Between the Crusade and the Mongol invasion (1200-1250) 0 Conclusions and lingering questions 0 Select bibliography index

X

XII XXVII

39 70 I I I

r8o 248 JII

MAPS

2

3 4 5 () 7

Southeastern Europe in the sixth century. Location of the principal sites mentioned in the text by ancient or modern (in parenthesis) names. Southeastern Europe in the "'Dark Age-;." Southeastern Europe in the ninth centurv. Southeastern Europe in the tenth century. Southeastern Europe in the eleventh century. Southeastern Europe in the twelfth century. Southeastern Europe between I 200 and I 2 )O.

Jhl.\ZC 4I

7I 3

I I

IS I

ACKNOWLEDGMEN TS

The debts mcurred over the four years during ,,·hich this book has taken - and changed - shape are numerous. In what follows I can onlv acknmvledge a fe\v specific and particularly important contributions. At the onset of this project is the work of many scholars in Southeast European countries, both h1stonans and archaeologists. For all my etl(!rt'> at svnthesis, this book would not exist without their remarkable accomplishment-; and dedication. It goes without saying that I alone am re-;ponsible t()r the use that has been made in this book of their ideas and representations of the past. Tlunks for financial support are due to the Medieval Institute at the University of Notre Dame tor the Mellon fellowship that made possible a valuable year offinal research and first drafi:s. The Hilandar Research Library at the Ohio State University kindly opened its doors and pnwided the space and time tor a brief visit before the manmcript entered it-; final stage. Recognition is also due to my students at the UmVL'rsity of Florida. who first raised in seminars and senior colloquia some of the questions that I have tried to elucidate in the tc1llowing pages. Among t!-iends and colleagues \Vho \Vere particularly supportive of this work, I want to acknowledge Piotr Gorecki, Maria Todorova, Jonathan Shepard, Roman Kovalev, Paul l3arford. C:vetelin Stcpanm·,joaclmn Henning, Alexandru Madgearu, and Paul Stephenson. My largest thanks go to my wife. Lucia, tor helping me see this book to completion, and to my daughter, Ana, for her patience and resilience.

NOTE ON TRANSLITER ATION, NAMES, DATES, AND WORDS

The transliteration of personal and place names t()llmvs a modified wrsion of the Library of Congress system. Tlm is espcciallv true tor Bulgarian words: "Velbazhd" instead of "Velbuzhd" and ''Carevec" instead of "Tsarevets." As a consequence, and t()r the sake of uniformity, I haw altered the standard transliteration tor Ukrainian names, e.g .. "Lenkyvcy" inste,ld of "Lcnkinsi." In general, the geographical terminology closely f(J!lmvs the language in usc in any g1ven area. Commonly ,lccepted equivalents arc excepted fi·om this rule. For example. "C:enad," "Durri..'s.'' and "Zadar" are Lwored m·er "Csan:1d," "Durazzo," and "Zara," but "Belgrade," "Bucharest," and "Corinth" arc preferred to "Beograd,'' "Bucure~ti." and "Korinthos." It IS particularly ditticult to be consistent about Greek torms, especiallY t()J' names of emperors. In such cases, I have tollo\vcd the established convention ,md used Constantine Porphvrogenitus and Andronicus, instc~1d of Komt.mtinc Porphyrogennetos and Andronikos. ThL· same I'> true for '>c\·cral Slavic names. I ha\'t: preferred Cyril to Kiril.Jolm to Ivan, and Peter to Pcrar or Petdr. On the other hand, I strove to n:spect dittering spellings, when anglicized versions ha\·e been long ,lCceptL'd as such. Thus the tirst Bulgarian emperor is Symeon. but his ILmles,lke, the tirst saint of Serbia. 1s Simeon. Since all dates are ti·om the mediC\-,11 period, ..."d)" is not used unless neccssarv in the context. Where nnprecise. yc~n·s arc g1\·cn in the torm "()3) I 6'' to indicate one vcar or the other. but as "1 20 3 or 120S, .. \vhen the optiom are scpaLHed by ,l longLT sp,m.

XI

Certain terms .1re 'ometimes used in a technical sense. which is specific to the space .md period comidered in this book. not in their ,,·idelY accepted meaning. Such is the c.1sc of the word "duke"" to rdtT to a military conmunder or warlord. For example. the Cro,ltian dukes of Bribir \Yere local governors of that fortress .md of the surrounding hinterLmd, but most importantly. local \Varlords. They should not be ,·iewed as a part of a feucbl h1erarchy in the same sense as. t()f example. the I )ukc of Burgundy might be \·ie\Yed. In much the qme \\·ay. a Byzantine duke \vas .1 commander of troops, not a title reft'rrmg to a position in the social and political hierarchv. The duke of Valon.1. t(Jr example. \Yas a military governor appomted by the emperor. "Qag~m"" is the highest "imperial"" title in medieval nomadic societies. while "khan"" (qan) 1s a lesser title. I use "theme"" in the sense of a (Byzantine) province, although the first attestation of the word in Bvzantine sources seems to point to army units. "Roman"" and "Byzantine"" arc used for distinct periods of time in the history of the Eastern RonLm Empire, \vhich has been arbitrarily divided by modern historians into an earlier and a later period, respectively. separated !rom each other by the reign of Emperor Hera eli us (f; ed. by K. Kaser, D. Gramshammer-Hohl, and R. Pichler (Klagent"lm and C:elovec: Wieser, 2003), p. 277. For the Balkan linguistic unity. sec now I. Sawicka, The Ba/k,ul Spmdlin111d ill the L(~ht o(l'ho11etic Fc!ltllrcs (Warsa\\·: Wydawnictwo Encrgcia. 191)7): J Lindstedt, "Linguistic l3.Ilkaniz.Hion: cont.lctinclucecl change by mutual reint(Jrcement," in Llllgiii(~patharios Elias, but it is unlikely that they joined the other Bulgars Tervel sent to raid the outskirts of Constantinople in retaliation to Philippikos' coup d'etat. They were probably recruited in the thematic army of Opsikion and never returned to Bulgaria. Nicephorus, Short History 47. p. I Is; Theophanes, C/m>lwgraphia i\M 6204, p. 532· Theophanes' mention of the cattle serves a special purpose, namely to draw a parallel between Bulgars and Arabs, both "stealthily throwing themselves" upon Byzantine territories apparently with no other purpose than taking captives and cattle. " Theophanes, C/mm201. p. 5I4; G. Ostrogorski, "Post.mak tema Hebda i Peloponez [Tlw creation of the themes of He!las and Peloponnesus],·· ZRl I ml. I (I 'J52). p. r,,. For the creation of the theme ofThrace. see R.-J. Lilie. "'Thrakien' und 'Thr.tkesion'. Zur byzantinischen Provinzorganisation amEnde des 7. Jahrhunderts," JOB. vol. 26 (ISJ77). p. 27. Thrace had been the basis tor Justinian ll's operatiom against llulgars and Slavs. while interruption of communications between the theme .md the city of Thessalonica prompted the emperor to cre.tte the milit.trv outpost on the Struma valley, later to become a klcisoum. " Theoph.mes. Chroii