187 60 36MB
English Pages [270] Year 1987
Table of contents :
Front Cover
Copyright
Table of Contents
List of Tables
List of Figures
Preface
1. Introduction
2. History of Research at Vlsac
3. Excavation Methods
4. Stratigraphy
5. Architectural Remains and Population Size
6. Chronology and Dating
7. Prehistoric Faunal Remains
8. Prehistoric Floral Remains
9. Prehistoric Human Remains
10. Non-Chipped Stone Artifacts: A Synopsis
11. The Chipped Stone Industry
12. The Chipped Stone Industry in Context: Utilization of Chipped Stone at Vlasac
13. Conclusions: Terminology and Perspective
Appendix
Bibliography
Mesolithic Adaptations on the Lower Danube Vlasac and the Iron Gates Gorge
Beth Prinz
BAR International Series 330 1987
B.A.R. 5, Centremead, Osney Mead, Oxford OX2 ODQ, England.
GENERAL EDITORS A.R. Hands, B.Sc., M.A., D.Phil. D.R. Walker, M.A.
B_,___A_,_R. -S330, 1987: 'Mesolithic Adaptations on the Lower Danube'
©
Beth Prinz, 1987.
The author’s moral rights under the 1988 UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act are hereby expressly asserted. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be copied, reproduced, stored, sold, distributed, scanned, saved in any form of digital format or transmitted in any form digitally, without the written permission of the Publisher. ISBN 9780860544241 paperback ISBN 9781407346021 e-book DOI https://doi.org/10.30861/9780860544241 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library This book is available at www.barpublishing.com
T ABLE O F C ONTENTS
P age 1 .
I NTRODUCTION
1
P urpose o f R esearch
1
L ocation o f The S ite
2
G eological H istory
4
B edrock G eology a nd L ithic R esources
5
L ocal T opography
5
C limate
7
S oils
7
M odern F lora
8
M odern F auna
8
2 .
H ISTORY O F R ESEARCH A T V LASAC
1 6
3 .
E XCAVATION M ETHODS
1 7
4 .
S TRATIGRAPHY
1 9
5 . ARCHITECTURAL R EMAINS A ND P OPULATION S IZE
6 .
A rchitectural R emains
2 2
P opulation S ize
2 8
I nterpretation
3 0
C HRONOLOGY AND DATING
3 2
T he I ron G ates S ites
3 2
C hronologies B ased o n L ithic A ssemblages C hronological R elations
7 .
8 .
4 3
t o Areas O utside
T he I ron G ates R egion
4 6
P REHISTORIC F AUNAL R EMAINS
5 6
O bservations o n S ample B ias
6 0
Overview a nd C omparisons
6 3
E uropean R ed D eer E conomies?
7 0
P REHISTORIC
F LORAL R EMAINS
O verview a nd C omparisons
9 .
2 2
7 5 7 7
P lants A s F ood
7 7
D iet a nd N utrition
8 1
P REHISTORIC H UMAN R EMAINS E vidence F or P opulation R eplacement L ongevity, F ertility a nd D ifferential B urial S keletal P athologies a nd Nutrition
8 3 8 3 8 4
1 0.
N ON-CHIPPED S TONE A RTIFACTS:
A S YNOPSIS
8 7
B one a nd Antler T ools
1. 1
8 7
G round a nd P ecked S tone T ools
9 5
Objets
9 7
d 'Art
T HE C HIPPED S TONE I NDUSTRY O F V LASAC Nature
o f
D ata S et
1 01
t he D ata 1 :
1 01
T he P rimary D ata S et
1 03
D ESCRIPTION O F A TTRIBUTES
1 03
M ETHODOLOGY O F C LASSIFICATION
1 05
U SE W EAR A NALYSIS
1 06
D ESCRIPTIVE C LASSIFICATION O F A RTIFACTS
11 1
V lasac I V lasac I I
11 1 1 22
V lasac I II
1 36
V lasac I V V lasac 0
1 51 1 54
T he C hipped S tone I ndustry o f D ata S et:
t he P rimary
C omparison a nd S ynthesis
T ECHNOLOGICAL A NALYSIS
1 58 1 60
Explaining A rtifact V ariation
1 60
T echnological A ttributes
1 63
G eneral T echnological C haracteristics o f t he C hipped S tone a t V lasac D ata S et 2 :
S quare 5 23
2 05
D ESCRIPTION O F A TTRIBUTES
2 05
A NALYSIS O F D ATA
2 06
D ata S et 3 :
S ummary D ata S et
2 15
D ESCRIPTION O F A TTRIBUTES
2 15
A NALYSIS O F D ATA
2 15
S ummary a nd I ntegration o f t he 3 D ata S ets: T he C hipped S tone I ndustry a t V lasac 1 2.
1 99
T HE C HIPPED S TONE
I NDUSTRY I N C ONTEXT
22 2 27 2
U tilization o f C hipped S tone a t V lasac
27 2
C hange Through T ime
28 2
11
1 3.
C ONCLUSIONS
2 31
T erminology a nd P erspective T he I ron G ates S ites
2 31 2 34
D irections
2 37
A PPENDIX:
f or F uture R esearch
C ATALOGUE O F A RCHEOLOGICAL S ITES
I N
T HE I RON G ATES G ORGE
2 39
B IBLIOGRAPHY
2 41
111
L IST O F T ABLES P age T able T able T able T able .T able T able T able T able T able
1 . 2. 3 . 4. 5. 6 . 7. 8. 9 .
T able 1 0. T able 1 1. T able 1 2. T able 1 3. 4. T able 1 T able 1 5. 6. T able 1 7. T able 1 8. T able 1 T able
1 9. 0. T able 2 1. T able 2 T able 2 2. T able 2 3. 4. T able 2 5. T able 2 6. T able 2 7. T able 2 8. T able 2 T able 2 9. T able 3 0. 1. T able 3 T able 3 2. 3. T able 3 4. T able 3 5. T able 3 T able 3 6. 7. T able 3 8. T able 3 9. T able 3 0. T able 4 1. T able 4 2. T able 4 4 3 . T able 4 4 . T able 5. T able 4 6. T able 4 7. T able 4
M odern F lora o f
t he I ron G ates G orge
M odern F ish F auna o f t he I ron G ates G orge M odern Amphibians o f t he I ron G ates G orge M odern R eptiles o f t he I ron G ates G orge M odern S maller M ammals o f t he I ron G ates G orge U ncorrected-Conventional D ates f or V lasac U ncorrected D ates f or L epenski V ir
9 1 1 1 3 1 4 1 5 3 3 3 4
C hronology a nd D ating o f t he I ron G ates S ites A ccording t rejovi . o L etica a nd S C, . 1 978 C hronology a nd D ating o f t he I ron G ates S ites A ccording t o B oroneant, ( 1968, 1 973, 1 980)
3 8
C arbon-14 D ates o f B one f rom P adina
4 1
N itrogen-Fluorine D ates f rom V lasac, U ncorrected R evised a nd U pdated C hronology f or t he I ron
4 2
G ates R egion U tilization o f R aw M aterials a t V arious R omanian S ites U tilization o f R aw M aterials a t V lasac
4 4 4 5 4 5
C arbon-14 D ates f or F ranchthi C ave R adiocarbon D ates f rom O dmut C ave, O dmut I
4 9 5 2
O dmut I I
5 2 5 7
R adiocarbon D ates f rom O dmut C ave, P rehistoric F auna f rom V lasac
3 6
H abitats o f V lasac F auna P rehistoric F auna F rom L epenski V ir P rehistoric F auna F rom P adina
5 9 6 4 6 7
C uina T urcului M ammals C uina T urcului P reliminary F ish F auna M ammal S pecies a t I coana N eolithic C uina T urcului M ammals
6 8 6 9 7 1 7 2
F ish F auna f rom O strovul B anului P ollen Analysis, L epenski V ir P ollen A nalysis, Bile H erculane
7 2 7 8 7 9
P ollen A nalysis, G ura C heii B one, A ntler a nd T usk T ools A ntler P oints
7 9 8 8 8 8
( Semi ) cylindrical A rtifacts w ith C utting E dges P erforated Antler A rtifacts F lat B one T ools
8 9 8 9 9 1
P ointed B one A rtifacts W orked B oar T usk G round a nd P ecked S tone T ools
9 2 9 3 9 6
E ngraved T ools V lasac I C hipped S tone C ategories V lasac I A rtifact C ategories a nd P atterns o f U se V lasac I I C hipped S tone C ategories V lasac I I A rtifact C ategories a nd P atterns o f U se V lasac I I I ntensity o f A rtifact U tilization V lasac I II C hipped S tone C ategories V lasac I II A rtifact C ategories a nd P atterns I V lasac II F requency o f R etouch I ntensity o f A rtifact U tilization
i v
9 8 1 20 1 21 1 35 •• 1 37 1 37 1 48
o f U se
▪• 1 49 1 50 1 50
P age T able 4 8. T able 4 9. T able 5 0.
V lasac T V C hipped S tone C ategories
1 55
T echnological A ttributes, P rimary D ata S et O ccurrence o f C ortex o n D ifferent M aterials, P rimary D ata S et
1 64 1 68
T able 5 1. 2. T able 5 T able 5 3. 4. T able 5
O ccurrence o f C ortex i n F inal D ata S et, F lint O nly. U tilization o f R aw M aterials--Primary D ata S et S triking P latform M eans F lake L ength, W idth a nd T hickness M eans
T able 5 5. T able 5 6. 7. T able 5
P latform W idth a nd F lake T hickness P latform L ength v s. P latform W idth R egression L ines f or P latform W idth ( Vertical Axis) b y P latform L ength
1 93 1 94
( Horizontal Axis) M ean V alues f or P latform L ength a nd W idth P latform L ength v s. F lake T hickness S imple C orrelations w ith F lake W idth
1 94 1 94 1 96 1 96
P artial C orrelations w ith F lake W idth S imple C orrelations w ith L ength P artial C orrelations w ith L ength L ength v s. W idth ( Horizontal) T hickness v s. L ength ( Horizontal)
1 96 1 97 1 97 1 98 1 98
T hickness ( Horizontal) v s. W idth C omparison o f M eans D isposition o f S quare 5 23 C hipped S tone S quare 5 23: F requencies o f T echnological A ttributes S quare 5 23: M ean V alues f or C ontinuous V ariables P redicted O ccurrence o f R etouched/Used A rtifacts
1 98 2 00 2 07 2 08 2 13 2 13
D istribution o f R aw M aterials b y L evels a t V lasac B reakdown o f K napping P roducts
2 16 2 17
B reakdown o f K napping P roducts f or D ifferent R aw M aterials T otal C ounts o f C hipped S tone: A ll D ata
2 19
S ets C ombined
23 2
T able 5 8. T able 5 9. T able 6 0. 1. T able 6 2. T able 6 3. T able 6 T able 6 4. T able 6 5. 6. T able 6 T able T able T able T able
6 7. 6 8.
6 9. 7 0. 1. T able 7 T able 7 2. 3. T able 7 4. T able 7 T able 7 5.
1 88 8 7 6 02 2
L IST O F F IGURES
P age F igure
1 .
T he I ron G ates G orge, A rcheological s ites
T ributaries a nd
T opography
3
F igure
2 .
T he I ron G ates G orge,
F igure
3 .
P lan o f E xcavation Units a t V lasac
1 8
F igure
4 .
S tratigraphic P rofile o f V lasac
2 0
F igure
5 .
A rchitectural F eatures,
V lasac I
2 3
F igure
6 .
A rchitectural F eatures,
V lasac I I
2 5
F igure
7 .
A rchitectural F eatures, V lasac I II
F igure
8 .
S haped T ools f rom V lasac I
14 1
F igure
9 .
S haped T ools
1 24
f rom V lasac I I
6
2 6
F igure 1 0.
S haped T ools f rom V lasac I II
1 39
F igure 1 1.
S haped T ools
1 53
F igure 1 2.
U nprovenienced V lasac S haped T ools
1 56
F igure 1 3.
H istograms
o f E dge Angles
1 73
F igure 1 4.
H istograms
o f P latform L ength a nd W idth
1 80
F igure 1 5.
H istograms
o f F lake L ength, W idth a nd T hickness
1 83
F igure 1 6.
S cattergrams
o f P latform W idth b y F lake T hickness....
1 88
F igure 1 7.
D eterminants
o f F lake S ize a nd P roportion
2 02
F igure
T he I ron G ates V iewed a s
1 8.
f rom V lasac I V
v i
t he C enter o f t he W orld
2 36
P REFACE T he
f ollowing
s tudy
i s
a c ontribution
t o
t he
o ngoing e xpansion o f
knowledge a nd r evision o f v iews r egarding t he Mesolithic a nd t he Mesolithic-Neolithic t ransition o n t he E uropean c ontinent . I t p resents y et a nother c ase where h unter-gatherer-fishers were c ertainly n ot l iving i n s mall , h ighly m obile g roups w ith m inimal m aterial g oods, a nd where t he a ppearance o f s heep/goats, c attle a nd
t he N eolithic c omplex o f g rains , d omesticated p igs a nd c eramics a nd p olished s tone d oes n ot
a ppear t o h ave r epresented a n i nvasion o f p eople a nd d isappearance o f t he p receding M esolithic p opulation.
t he
s imultaneous
The s tudy p resented h erein o f u se p atterns a nd manufacturing s tyles o f t he c hipped s tone i ndustry o f V lasac, a s ite w ith 3 Mesolithic a nd 1 Neolithic l evels, s uggests c ultural c ontinuity t hroughout t he o ccupations o f t he s ite. C ritical e xamination o f t he s tone a nd b one t ools, a rt, h uman s keletal r emains, a rchitectural e vidence, f aunal a nd f loral r emains f urther s uggest t hat: 1 .
Continuity i n p opulation and c ulture are i ndicated a t V lasac f or a t ime s pan which i ncludes t he t ransition t o a N eolithic e conomy.
2 .
Sedentis m characterized o ccupation o f V lasac.
3 .
Domestication o f t he d og, a nd i nitial s teps t owards t he d omestication o f p igs a nd s ome c ereals p receded t he a ppearance o f t he N eolithic
t he
c omplex---ceramics, polished d omesticates w ith u ltimate o rigins
Mesolithic
s tone a nd i n t he N ear
E ast. 4 .
P opulation a nd c ultural c ontinuity, s edentism , and i ndependent do mestication in fact c haracterized t he whole c omplex o f Mesolithic s ites
i n
t he I ron G ates G orge ,
a nd
w as
p robably
n ot r are i n M esolithic E urope i n g eneral. The r esearch f or t his v olume was o riginally s upported b y t he F ulbright-Hayes p rogram a nd I REX ( International R esearch Exchange) . F igures 3 -7 a re f rom t he o riginal s ite r eport o n V lasac, a nd a re r eproduced h ere c ourtesy o f t he a uthors a nd e xcavators o f V lasac, D rs. D .
S rejovi
a nd Z . L etica.
v ii
I NTRODUCTION P urpose o f R esearch The i ntroduction o f methods o f f ood p roduction i nto E urope i s g enerally a ccepted t o h ave o riginated f rom what i s n ow T urkey, v ia G reece a nd t he B alkan P eninsula, a nd t hence i nto t he r est o f E urope. T he p rocess b y which E urope was t ransformed f rom a c ontinent i nhabited b y f oragers i nto o ne i nhabited b y f armers i s s till i nadequately u nderstood . T his s tudy i s d irected t o t he f urther e lucidation o f t hat p rocess. When t he f irst f armers m oved i nto t he B alkan P eninsula t here w ere p opulations o f f oragers a lready l iving t here . I n s ome a reas, s uch a s t he I ron Gates G orge, t he f irst a ppearance o f p ottery, g round s tone t ools, a nd d omesticated s heep/goats, c attle a nd p igs o n s ome s ites s eems t o h ave c oincided with t he d isappearance o f e vidence o f t raditional f oragers who l acked p ottery, e tc. B ut what a ctually h appened? D id t he r esident f oragers " evaporate" i n a c ultural/ethnic s ense? Were t hey e radicated a s a p opulation b y t he f armers? D id t hey immediately r ecognize t he s uperiority o f f ood p roduction o ver d ependence o n wild r esources, a nd t ransform t hemselves v irtually " overnight"? D id t hey c oexist a nd b ecome t rading p artners with t he f armers , o nly g radually a dopting f ood p roduction a s t heir f undamental m eans o f s ubsistence? What, i f a nything , d id t he f armers l earn/adopt f rom t he f oragers? How d id t he p rior e xistence o f t he f oragers c ontribute t o t he p rocess o f f ormulation o f t he N eolithic i n E urope? T he t endency , i n m ost s tudies o f E uropean p rehistory , h as b een t o write o ff t he s ignificance o f r esident M esolithic p opulations i n t he d evelopment o f t he E uropean N eolithic . T his d erives f rom t he n otion t hat c ultures b ased o n f ood p roduction a re " higher" o n s ome q ualitative s cale a nd t hat u ltimately, c ulture f lows " downhill" ( i.e. t o t he l ess " sophisticated"). F ood p roduction d oes, e ventually, s upport m uch d enser p opulations t han d oes f oraging , a nd t he f ood s upply i s u sually more d ependable. H owever, d uring t he s pread o f f arming i nto Europe, f ood p roducing t echnology was i n i ts i nfancy , a nd t he s ocial m echanisms f ound i n horticultural s ocieties which a ssure s upply ( e.g., r edistribution s ystems) m ust a lso h ave b een i ncomplete , i f t hey h ad i n f act t aken s hape a t a ll. Under t hese c onditions i t i s l ikely t hat g athering , f ishing a nd h unting were a t l east a s p roductive a nd r eliable a s f arming . I n a ddition, t he Mesolithic p opulations o f E urope were l ongtime i nhabitants w ith a daptations b ased o n a n e xcellent k nowledge o f s easonal r esource a vailability . T he f irst f armers w ere m oving n orth i nto e ssentially unknown h abitats, a nd p rogressively more marginal c limatic c onditions f or
t he p roduction o f t heir n ewly d omesticated
p lants. F or t hese r easons i t s eems u nlikely t hat t he " neolithicization" o f Europe c ould h ave p roceeded a s swiftly a s i t d id without s ome i nvolvement o f p reviously e xisting Mesolithic p opulations i n t he p rocess. C hipped s tone t ools a re t he c entral p rimary, d urable t echnology i n b oth a daptations a nd t hus p resent a n o bvious a rtifact c ategory f or s tudying c ontinuity a nd Formal s tone
t ool
c hange
b etween
t he
t wo p eriods.
t ypes s hould c hange f rom o ne p eriod t o t he o ther,
1
s ince
t he
t echnological n eeds o f e ach a daptation would b e a t l east
p artly d ifferent . T he s ame t echnology--based i n a c ultural t radition-c an h owever p roduce d ifferent t ools t o m eet n ew n eeds. T o a ssess whether t here i s c ontinuity f rom M eso- to N eolithic we must a sk whether t he s tone t ools h ave b een m ade i n t he s ame t echnological s tyle, o r w ith t he s ame r eduction s trategy, n ot whether t hey a re f ormally t he s ame t ools a s t hose o f t he e arlier p eriod. T he f ollowing t echnological a nalysis o f t he c hipped s tone f rom a m ulti-occupation s ite s panning t he p eriod i n q uestion i s a n a ttempt t o l ook a t t he d ata i n t his w ay . T he h ypothesis t o b e t ested i s: t hat t here i s c ultural c ontinuity f rom Mesolithic t o N eolithic i n t he s ite s elected f or s tudy a s r eflected i n t he f laked s tone a ssemblage. I t will t echnological s tyles ( reduction s trategies)
b e a ssumed t hat i f t he a re d ifferent, t here i s n o
c ontinuity . T he r esult o f s uch a n i nquiry w ill b e a n ew b ase o n which t o b egin r eassessing o ur understanding o f t he p rocess o f c ultural c hange. L ocation o f t he S ite T he s ite o f V lasac i s l ocated o n t he Yugoslav , o r s outhern s hore o f t he D anube R iver i n t he western, o r u pstream t hird o f t he 1 45 k ilometer l ong I ron Gates G orge ( Figure 1 ). The e xact l ocation i s 4 4°32 n orth l atitude, 2 2 °3 ' e ast l ongitude . I t a nd a n umber o f o ther s ites were d iscovered a nd s ubsequently e xcavated a s p art o f i ntensive s urvey a nd s alvage p rojects l aunched b y Yugoslavia a nd R omania , e ach o n i ts own s ide o f t he r iver, i n t he 1 960's. These e fforts were i n r esponse t o t he c ooperative d am j ointly u nder c onstruction a t t he e astern e nd o f t he Gorge. The d am was c ompleted i n 1 971, a nd a s a r esult, V lasac a nd m ost o f t he o ther s ites d iscussed i n t his p aper a re n ow u nderwater ( see H ISTORY O F R ESEARCH). B ecause o f t he c onstruction o f t he d am , a nd t he d estruction t o b e c aused b y i ts b ack-up l ake, i ntensive e fforts were made t o s tudy t he f lora, f auna, g eology, h ydrology, e tc., o f t he I ron Gates G orge, a nd m uch
o f
t his
f orm , a nd n umber o f p eriod
i nformation h as
b ecome
a vailable ,
a lbeit
i n
a bbreviated
i s e xtremely u seful t o s tudies o f p rehistory . A v ery l arge s ites f rom t he l ate P leistocene a nd e arly p ost-Pleistocene
( see A ppendix) h ave b een l ocated,
a nd m any h ave b een e xcavated.
T he i nformation available f rom t he e xcavation o f t hese s ites i s p articularly v aluable s ince t he e arly p ost-glacial g atherer-hunters o f t he B alkan P eninsula a re v ery p oorly u nderstood . F ew s ites h ave b een excavated o r e ven l ocated, a nd e ven f ewer t horoughly s tudied a nd p ublished . T his s ituation i s d ue i n l arge p art t o a l ack o f e nthusiasm among a rcheologists f or t he M esolithic p eriod . T he M esolithic l acks o n t he o ne h and t he e legantly r etouched t ools a nd mobiliary a rt o f t he U pper Paleolithic a nd, o n t he o ther h and, t he o ften a esthetically a ppealing c eramics o f t he s ubsequent N eolithic . T he Mesolithic h as i n f act f requently b een v iewed a s a c ultural r egression f rom t he U pper P aleolithic , a t l east b y s ome E uropean s cholars . When o ne s urveys t he e vidence, h owever , i t b ecomes c lear t hat a ny " view" o f t he M esolithic i n t his a rea i s l argely f antasy, b ecause w e h ave a lmost n o d ata o n i t. This understand
l ack t he
o f
d ata
o f
t ransition
c ourse f rom
a lso
f rustrates
Mesolithic
2
t o
a ny
a ttempt
Neolithic.
I t
t o i s
H ,
w 4 ' 0
C , , W.0
,
,, m 4 — i
c v
4 . 1 6 1 (4 ,J
4 . ) ,, , i ,s i w cm o
1 , 1 11 M M O U P . >
,
1 , , >
, X
W W / 4 -1 4, 0 C C
0 , G
W >
>
• c l i w m, , - E E' - 4 1 • . 4 . . ,
0 , l A 0 1 H M
, W 0 11 M
M
r i
, C M
e
w m o
M M O s e
, 1 ( 1 , 1 ,4,,
m 1 >J 2 w , c ol ,L , / M IJ O 01 1 : 1 6 1 0 1 4 ,
X
M Z
/
t r, m m e m m o ii - it . , m»o m >m › . > 4 : 4 : 1 46 1 4 10 )0 )0 ) 4 4 m$ 4,a c c o . w m o.o 4 , ) ,, >T i m41 , w g ‘t ,
, m , 0 0 0 m ww w w w m m u m m o w o . . 1 0. 4 0 0 0 a a > u a a ac , a m . m Oca 0 0
F igure 1 :
T he I ron G ates G orge -T ributaries a nd A rchaeological S ites
3
i mpossible t o t ruly a ssess t he c ontribution o f Mesolithic c ultures t o t he d evelopment o f t he European Neolithic until o ur knowledge o f M esolithic c ultures h as b een g reatly i ncreased . T he I ron G ates G orge o ffers a n i deal p lace i n which t o s tudy Mesolithic a daptations a nd M esolithic-Neolithic d evelopments . I t c onstitutes a r emarkably w elld efined g eographical s pace w ith u nique c limate, f lora, a nd f auna. G eological H istory
c uts
The I ron Gates Gorge i s t hat p art o f t he Danube's c ourse which t hrough t he S outhern C arpathians. I t i s 1 45 k ilometers l ong . T o
u nderstand t he h istory o f t his r egion i t i s n ecessary t o g o b ack t o t he l ate Mesozoic . A t t hat t ime t he i nland T ethys S ea c overed western N orth A frica, t he s outhern h alf o f Europe, a nd western A sia. The e nd o f t he Mesozoic was marked b y a g reat r egression o f t he s eas f rom E urope , b ut without a ny m ajor o rogenies . I n t he C enozoic , t he T ethys S ea was r educed and b roken u p, f irst i n t he Oligocene b y t he d evelopment o f s ome o f t he p rincipal f olds o f t he S outhern A lps , t hen i n t he M iocene b y o rogenic m ovements i n t he A lps a nd C arpathians, a nd f inally b y e peirogenic m ovements i n t he P liocene . T he l ate C enozoic d escendent o f t he T ethys S ea i n E urope was a west t o e ast s tring o f h uge i nland l akes ( called c ollectively t he S armatian S ea) , n amely : T he P annonian Lake, The Dacian B asin, A ralo-Caspian ( Kummel, 1 970).
E uxine
B asin,
B lack S ea a nd
t he
B y t he e nd o f t he M iocene t he S armatian S ea h ad b een c ut o ff f rom t he M editerranean . S outhern G ermany was b eing d rained b y t he D anube i nto t he P annonian B asin . T he l atter i s t hought t o h ave o verflowed t he C arpathians i nto t he D acian B asin, a nd t he p oint i n s pace a nd t ime where t his o verflow b egan m arked t he b eginning o f t he f ormation o f t he I ron Gates Gorge ( Linton a nd Moseley, 1 970, p . 2 5). The p ath o f t his d eveloping water c ourse, i ncluding t he I ron G ates G orge, f ollowed a d epression which i n t he O ligocene a nd e arly M iocene f ormed a s alt water s trait c onnecting t he s ame b asins ( Pannonian a nd D acian , which w as a t t hat t ime s till c onnected t o t he P onto-Caspian B asin). • A l ong p rocess o f r egression a nd u plift l ed t o t he s eparation o f t he Aral S ea f rom t he P onto-Caspian i n t he P liocene a nd i n t he e arly P leistocene t he B lack f rom t he C aspian. A s t he S armatian S ea a nd i ts s uccessors r etreated a nd d ivided , t he f unction o f c ollecting w ater f rom n orth a nd e ast o f t he Alps, a nd f rom s outh , e ast a nd west o f t he C arpathians a nd f rom t he N orthern B alkans 1 967).
was
t aken
o ver
b y
t he
P aleo-Danube .
( Banu ,
A s eries o f e ight t erraces h ave b een i dentified i n t he l ower tself o nly s ix may b e s een . The Danube, a lthough i n t he I ron Gates - i h ighest i ntact t errace , n umber V III, 2 10-250 m eters a bove m odern w ater l evel, h as b een i dentified a s U pper P liocene ( Gr. Posea, e t a l, 1 972). Above t his t errace a re t races o f L ower P liocene ( 260-370 meters) a nd p re-Miocene v alleys ( 400 m eters) ( Bu v iita e t a l , 1 970) . T erraces V II, 2 00-210 m eters, I ron G ates G orge
a nd V I, i tself .
1 50-160 m eters, T errace V ,
4
c annot b e i dentified w ithin t he
9 0-115
m eters,
m arked a p eriod
o f
s trong e rosion i n t he d epth o f
t he r iver b ed ,
d ated t o t he b eginning o f
t he P leistocene , which p roduced t he m odern c ontours a nd p rofile o f t he D anube ( ibid, p .24). L ower t erraces a re n ot d ated, b ut T errace I , 4 -8 meters, may b e d ated a t l east t o t he R iss g laciation o n t he b asis o f t he s tudy o f t he V lasac t errace. f illed i n b y 1 978, p .26).
l oess
d ated
t o
t he
A meander c ut i nto t hat t errace was R iss
g laciation
( Markovi -Marjanovi ,
B ed R ock G eology a nd L ithic R esources The g eological s tructure o f t he C arpathians, l ike t hat o f t he A lps, i s e xtremely c omplex a nd i ncludes t he p resence o f a N appe . T he main s trata a re o riented s outheast-northwest, a nd r epresent t he Q uaternary, T ertiary , C retaceous, J urassic, P ermian a nd C arboniferous. " A w ide r ange o f s edimentary , m etamorphic a nd magmatic r ocks" a re f ound i n t he Gorge ( MutihaC, 1 972, p . 1 46). Exposed b eds i n t he G orge a t water's e dge c onsist o f: g abbros, s erpentines, r hyolite, g ranites, c rystalline s chists, l imestones, m arls a nd l ime m arls, c lay a nd l imy s hales, c onglomerates, s andstones, l imy s andstones, s chists , p orphyry , p yroclastite a nd q uartz-rich p orphyry . ( Cartogram V , p . 2 3, I ron G ates A tlas, 1 972) . I n t he immediate a rea o f V lasac , l imestone c onglomerate , s chist, p orphyry, p redominate.
p yroclastite
a nd q uartz-rich p orphyry e xposures
Q uartz a nd c hert were t he t wo m ain r aw m aterials u tilized i n t he c hipped s tone i ndustry a t V lasac . M ost o f t he q uartz h ad t he c ortex o f s tream r olled p ebbles, and p robably o riginated b y e rosion o f c onglomerate i n t he a rea ( J. Donahue, p .c.) . C herts h ad e ither water worn c ortex o r l imestone m atrix a ttached a nd were d erived f rom l ocal l imestone s trata . A f ew p ieces o f s iltstone , l imestone , s andstone a nd v arious v olcanics, a ll a lso l ocally e vident, were a lso u tilized f or c hipped s tone t ools. A small n umber o f r ocks, c alled " silica r ocks" ( Karamata, G eological Institute, B elgrade, p .c.) were a lso u tilized. T hese were p robably d erived f rom c herty l imestone f rom t he J urassic a nd C retaceous s trata l ocally e xposed, s ome o f which were p artially metamorphosed b y l ocal v olcanism. The o nly s tone u sed a t a ny o f t he s ites d iscussed h ere w hich was n ot o f l ocal o rigin was a f ew p ieces o f o bsidian f rom t he e arly N eolithic l evel a t L epenski V ir l ocated s ome t hree k m t o t he n orthwest, o r u pstream , f rom V lasac. L ocal T opography The t opography i n t he v icinity o f t he s ite o f V lasac i s q uite r ugged ( see F igure 2 ) . I n p laces t he m ountains f orm v ertical c liffs u p f rom t he water, a nd p assage a long t he r iverbank i s i mpossible. T he h ills d irectly b ehind V lasac r ise 3 00-440 meters t o t he r im o f t he G orge . B eyond t he r im l ie s teep h ills 4 00-600 meters h igh. B etween V lasac a nd Lepenski V ir l ies a r iver, t he L epena o r B oljetinska, t he c anyon o f which f orms a n atural p assage o ver t he r im o f t he I ron G ates G orge ( ibid,
p .145).
The Gorge c an b e d ivided i nto t hree d istinct z ones: p roper ,
c overing a bout
t en p ercent
o f
i tself;
a s eries o f e ight t erraces,
5
t he a rea a nd
t he v alley
i ncluding
t he
r iver
c overing 2 5 p ercent o f t he a rea;
F igure 2 :
T he I ron G ates G orge -T opography
6
and the mountain slopes which include a dense system of secondary rivers and valleys running into the Danube (Iancu 1972, p.149). The. density of tributary streams on the Romanian side is greater, exceeding 20 �ermanent streams. Fewer major tributaries (5) are mapped for the Yugoslav side (see Figure 2). Tributaries in this part of the Danube are generally small relative to those outside of the Gorge (Banu 1972, p.157). The altitude of the Carpathian Mountains decreases from north to south where the Danube cuts through them, and the mountains in back of the Romanian banks are more rugged, regularly to 700 and even to 1,000 meters, whereas on the Yugoslav side, an altitude of 700 meters is attained in only one small area. Much of the drai�age of the Yugoslav side is south into the Danube where it meanders back towards the west after leaving the gorge before swinging back east to the Black Sea (Iancu, 1972, p.22). The depth and width of the river channel is extremely variable in the gorge. Where the river cuts thro ugh soft (limestone) rocks it is wide and shallow (widest point 2, 150 meters; shallowest bottom 6.5 meters). Where it cuts through hard rocks (granite and crystalline schists) it is narrow and deep (narrowest point is 150 meters; greatest depth: 70 meters). Where the river is narrow and deep the valley usually has vertical sides, and the speed of the water is greatest (5.7 meters/second in the most dangerous section of the river). (Sencu and Zavoianu, 1972, p.151). Climate The Danube gorge as a whole lies in a region of moderate temperate continental climate. Differences in altitude and position within the gorge interact to produce a series of microclimatic zones with measurable differences: the first zone of the river bank is modified (warmed) by its closeness to the water. Annual mean temperature is ll.6 ° C, whereas the mean annual temperature of the lowest terrace is 11.2 ° C. The medium-high terraces get more sunshine than the low terrace, and mean annual temperature is equal to or greater than 11.7 ° C. The high terraces are more exposed to winds and therefore colder and receive the heaviest rainfall. Within these four microzones frirther differences in sunshine depend on the �ompass direction of slopes (Dumitrescu, 1972, p.153). In addition, narrow sections of the Gorge are colder than wide sections, but have less extreme temperature fluctuation, and more rainfall (Milic et al, 1972, p.173). Th� only month Qf the year which has had an average monthly temperature below freezing since 1896 is January. October through .April a rare frost has been recorded (Brezeanu, 1970, p.33) . Soils Soils in the gorge attest to tqe great diversity of microclimatic conditions and underlying geology. Slightly leached ch�rnozems, brown podsol soils, brown soils, brown acid soils, ferric illuvial podsols, Rendzina, Terra rosa, Erubasemes, alluvial soils and regosoils are some of the dominant types found in this highly varied region (G lavan and Geanana, 1972, p.154) .
7
Soils p odsolized,
i n
t he
b rown ,
immediate b rown a cid,
v icinity
o f
V lasac
c onsist
o f
b rown
r endzina a nd s urface r ocks.
M odern F lora The e ast-west o rientation o f t he G orge h as c aused i t t o b uffer c limate c hanges t aking p lace , a nd d ampen t emperature f luctuations . T he Gorge i s t hus a r efuge a rea f or p lant c ommunities which a re n ow o therwise a bsent l ocally , t hough a nalogous c ommunities d o e xist f urther s outh . T he v ariety o f p lants i s a lso e nhanced b y t he g reat v ariety o f s oils a nd m icroclimates w ithin t he G orge . G reat d ensity o f v egetation i s r elated t o t he m ists a nd g eneral h umidity p roduced b y t he r iver , a s well a s t he r ainfall which r anges f rom a l ow o f 4 0 mm i n J uly t o a h igh o f 1 10 m m i n M ay. The p resent d ay p lant c ommunities i n t he a rea o f L epenski V ir, t hree k ilometers f rom V lasac , a re w ell d escribed ( Mi n e t a l , 1 972) . R elict m ixed o ak f orests s urvive a nd c ontain s pecies e numerated i n T able I . T he s teepest a nd m ost e xposed s lopes a re c overed w ith l ilac ( Syringa v ulgaris), m ixed w ith o ther s crub a nd b ushes. Low
s loping
c haracterized s pecies
m ixed
b y
s helves,
s urviving
i n w ith
c lose
t o
c ommunities
t hese
t wo
t he o f
i nclude :
water
and
s haded,
b eech a nd w alnut. l inden ,
h ornbeam ,
are
S econdary s ycamore
a nd e lm. B etween t he l ower b eech-walnut a nd h igher m ixed o ak s tands i s a s urviving mixed c ommunity o f walnut a nd h ackberry. H ackberry g rows e xtremely v igorously h ere , w ith i ndividual t runks a s l arge a s 8 0 cm i n d iameter , a nd t housands o f s hoots a nd s aplings e verywhere ( Migi e t a l , 1 972). A s n oted a bove, t he modern a typical o f t he s urrounding a rea .
f lora o f t he I ron G ates G orge a re S ome s pecies f ound i n t he G orge a re
t ypical o f a warmer l atitude, g enerally M editerranean i n d istribution , a nd a re a ctually r elics o f a w armer c limatic p eriod i n t he p ast . T hese s pecies
s urvive
i n
t he G orge
b ecause
t he
e ast-west
o rientation
o f
t he
r iver's v alley walls b uffer p revailing winds a nd h old i n warmth a nd h umidity, p roducing a w armer , w etter a nd l ess v ariable c limatic r egime . T he G orge i s a lso c haracterized b y a d iversity o f p lants a typical f or t he s urrounding a rea . T he g reat v ariety o f s oils a nd m icro-climates w ithin t he G orge,
d etailed a bove,
a re l argely r esponsible f or t his.
M odern F auna Though i t i s t raditional i n t he a rchaeological l iterature t o t abulate t he t errestrial v ertebrate f aunas b efore t he f luvial o r m arine e lements, f ish s pecies f ound i n t he I ron G ates r egion o f t he D anube h ave b een more i ntensively s tudied a nd d ocumented, a nd a re o f c onsiderable c ommercial i mportance t oday. The
I ron
Gates
Complex
Atlas
( 1972,
p .
1 79)
r eports
t he
i dentification o f 6 2 f ish s pecies, b ut n ames n one. I n a l ater p ublication ( Banarescu e t a l., 1 978), t he m ost important s pecies a re d iscussed . B efore c onstruction o f t he d am B arbus b arbus ( Barbel) was
8
T ABLE
1
M ODERN F LORA O F T HE I RON G ATES G ORGE
T axon
C ommon N ame
Q uercetum m ixtum
O ak
Q uercus p ubescens A ppenine Q uercus s essilia
O ak S essile O ak T urkey O ak L inden L inden L inden
Q uercus c erris T ilia g randifolia T ilia a rgentea T ilia p arvifolia C arpinus o rientalis C ornus m as. C rataegus n igra C rataegus m onogyna F raxinus o rnus B erberis v ulgaris V igernun l antana C otinus c ozzygria C lematis v italba P runus m ahaleb E unonymus v errucosa A cer m onspessulanum S orbus t orminalis S orbus d omestica P irus c ommunis R osa s pp. F raxinum e xcelsior R uscus a culeatus C eterach o fficinarum E uphorbia c yparissios L ithospermum p urpurescoeruleum D actylis g lomerate H edera h elix T hymus g labrescens G eum u rbanum S edum m aximum V iola s ilvestris F estuca o vinz
H ornbeam C ornelian C herry H awthorn H awthorn M anna a sh B erberis W ayfaring t ree S mokewood T raveler's j oy S t. L ucie C herry S pindle-tree M ontpelier M aple W ild s ervice S ervice W ild p ear R ose C ommon a sh B utcher's b room F inger f ern C ypress s purge P urple g romwell C ock's f oot g rass C ommon i vy T hyme C ommon a vens S tonecrop W ood v iolet S heep's f escue
t he most a bundant f ish, c omprising b etween 1 6.5 a nd 5 8.8% o f t he f ish s tock i n v arious p laces a nd a t v arious s easons . T his f ish o ccurred i n t he-1940's g enerally u p t o f our k ilos, a nd r arely u p.to 1 0 k ilos. r oe a re p oisonous ( Berg, v ol. 2 , 1 964, p . 2 32). T he
f ish
s econd
i n a bundance
was
t he
s terlet,
I ts
A cipenser r uthenus,
c omprising b etween 2 .3 a nd 1 0.7% o f t he f ish s tock ( Banarescu e t a l, 1 978 , 1 75) . T his f ish a verages 6 -6.5 k ilograms, b ut c an " weigh u p t o 1 6 k ilograms ( Berg, v ol. 1 , 1 962, p .67). A bramis b rama ( bream) a nd V imba v imba ( Black S ea v imba) a re a lso d escribed a s r elatively important ( Banarescu , 1 978, p .175) . T he f ormer a verages t hree k ilos a nd i s r arely f ound t o w eigh u p t o s ix k ilos . A t t he p rehistoric s ite o f C uina T urcului D ubova , h owever , b ream r eached a weight o f 1 0-12 k ilos ( Nalbant, 1 970, p . 4 2). T he v imba i s s maller, averaging . 2 — . 4 k ilos, a nd o ccurring u p t o . 8 k ilos. v ol. 2 , p p. 3 22 a nd 3 46).
( Berg,
1 964,
C arp ( Cyprinus c arpio) which i s t he d ominant f ish i n m ost p arts o f t he Danube, i s i n t his part only . 1 t o 8 .8% o f t he f ish s tock ( Banarescu, 1 978, p .175). I n t he 1 940's C arp were s till f ound u p t o a nd over 1 6 k ilos ( Berg, v ol. 2 ,
1 964,
p .391).
O ther i mportant f ish r eported b y B anarescu f or t he p re—dammed I ron G ates R egion a re l isted i n T able 2 . B anarescu e t a l t hus d iscuss a t otal o f 2 7 o f t he p reviously r eported 6 2 f ishes i n t he r egion . B erg ( 1965, p p. 2 84-302) l ists a t otal o f 8 3 c ertain a nd 5 s uspected s pecies f or t he D anube a s a w hole, b ased o n d ata f rom t he 1 940's. The h eavy, a nd e ver—increasing i ndustrial—commercial u se o f t he D anube, p articularly u pstream, h as u ndoubtedly a ffected t he b iotic c ommunity which i t s upports . B ut t he u se a nd p ollution o f t he D anube i s much l ess i n t he I ron G ates Gorge t han i t i s f urther u pstream. I t i s c ertain t hat t he a verage a nd m aximum weights a ttained b y a ll o f t he l arger s pecies o f f ish h ave b een g reatly r educed i n t he l ast 4 0 y ears. O ther r iverine f auna i nclude 1 4 s pecies o f a mphibians ( see T able 3 ) a nd 1 6 s pecies o f r eptiles ( see T able 4 ) which were i dentified i n t he I ron G ates p rior t o t he c ompletion o f t he d am . The o nly p ublished d ocumentation o f modern l and mammals o f t he I ron Gates G orge d eals o nly with s maller m ammals ( see T able 5 ). Smaller m ammals, s uch a s t he m ice a nd o ther c reatures l isted i n T able 5 , a re l ess l ikely t o b e t otally d isplaced b y e xpansion o f h uman s ettlements t han a re l arge wild a nimals s uch a s b ear, wild p ig, a nd wolf . I n a ddition t o t he d omesticated l arge m ammals ( dog , s heep, g oat, p ig, c ow, h orse, d onkey a nd c at), wild l arge mammals u ndoubtedly d o s till i nhabit t he a rea i n r educed n umbers, b ut h ave n ot b een r eported.
1 0
T ABLE 2 M ODERN F ISH F AUNA O F T HE I RON G ATES G ORGE** -T axon
C ommon N ame
A v. W t./Lgth.
B lue b ream
1 00 g r.
A bramis s apa
W hite-eye b ream
. 8 k g.
B licca b joerkna
S ilver b ream
1 .25 k g.
R utilus r utilus
R oach
2 00 g r.
T ench
1 .2-1.6 k g. r arely t o 7 .5kg
C rucian c arp
t o 4 -5 k g.
P russian c arp
. 5-1.1 k g.
* Abramis b allerus
* Tinca t inca
C arassius c arassius * Carassius a ratus g ibelio * Scardinius e rythro-
R udd
p hthalmus L epomis g ibbosus ( eats e ggs a nd y oung o f o ther f ish)
1 00-400 g . r arely t o 2 k g.
P umpkinseed
I ntroduced f rom N orth America
* Leuciscus i dus
I de
. 8-2.4kg. r arely t o 8 k g.
* Alburnus a lburnus
B leak
l ength t o 1 70 mm.
* Chalcalburnus
D anube s hemaya
2 2-25 c m.
L euciscus c ephalus
C hub
t o 4 k g. r arely t o 8 k g.
* Chondrostoma n asus
. N ase
C halcoides m ento
t o 2 .5 k g.
C ymnocephalus s chraetser
S triped r uff
? t o 2 002 40 m m.
Z ingel.zingel
Z ingel
? t o 4 80 mm .
A spius a spius
.A sp
2 -4 k g. r are
P elecus c ultratus
C hekhon
1 1
t o 1 2 k g.
2 00-500 g . r are t o 3 .5 k g.
T ABLE
2 ( CONT'D)
C ommon N ame
Av. W t./Lgth.
* Siluris g lanis
C atfish
t o 3 00 k g.
* Stizostedion l ucioperca
P ike p erch
T axon
8 -12 k g. r are t o 1 8 k g.
E sox l ucius
P ike
1 6-24 k g. 6 5 k g.
P erca f luviatilis
F reshwater p erch
. 8-1.2 k g. r are t o 4k g.
* = a fter B erg, 1 962 * * =C ommercial, i n 1 940's
1 2
t o
T ABLE 3 M ODERN A MPHIBIANS O F T HE I RON G ATES G ORGE*
T axon
C ommon N ame
S alamandra s .
s alamandra
S potted s alamander
T rituris v . v ulgaris
S mooth n ewt
T rituris c .
C rested n ewt
c ristatus
T rituris c . d obrogicus
N ewt
B ombina b ombina
F ire-bellied t oad
B ombina v . v ariegata
O range-speckled t oad
B ufo b .
b ufo
C ommon t oad
B ufo v .
v iridis
G reen t oad
H yla a .
a rborea
G reen t ree f rog
P elobates f .
f uscus
S padefoot
t oad
P elobates s yriacus b alcanicus
B alkan t oad
R ana r .
M arsh f rog
r idibunda
R ana e sculenta
E dible f rog
R ana d almatina
F rog
*
I ron G ates C omplex A tlas,
p .
6 0;
G raf,
1 968.
T ABLE 4 M ODERN R EPTILES O F T HE I RON G ATES G ORGE*
T axon
C ommon N ame
Emys o rbicularis
P ond t ortoise
T estudo h . h ermanni
T ortoise
A blepharus K itaibelii s tepaneki L acerta a . a gilis
S and
L acerta v .
v iridis
G reen l izard
L acerta t .
t aurica
B ull l izard
L acerta m . m uralis
W all l izard
L acerta v ivipara
C ommon l izard
L acerta p racticola p ontica
L izard
A nguisfragilis c olchicus
S low w orm
N atrix n .
G rass
n atrix
l izard
s nake
N atrix t esselata
T essellated s nake
C oronella a .
S mooth s nake
a ustriaca
E laphe 1 .
l ongissima
A esculapian s nake
V ipera a .
a mmolytes
V iper
V ipera b enus b enus
*I ron G ates C omplex A tlas,
A dder
p .
6 0.
1 4
T ABLE 5 M ODERN S MALLER MAMMALS O F T HE I RON G ATES G ORGE*
T axon
C ommon N ame
T alpa e uropea
c ommon m ole
N eomys a nomalus
s outhern w ater s hrew
S orex a raneus
c ommon s hrew
C rocidura s uareolens
s hrew
S ciurus v ulgaris
r ed s quirrel
C rocidura l eucodon
f ield s hrew
M icromys m inutus
h arvest m ouse
M us m usculus
h ouse m ouse
R attus r attus
b lack r at
A podemus a grarius
s triped m ouse
A podemus m icrops
m ouse
A podemus s ylvaticus
l ong-tailed f ield m ouse
A podemus f lavicollis
y ellow-necked m ouse
C ricetus c ricetus
c ommon h amster
A rvicola t errestris
w ater v ole
M icrotus a rvalis
c ommon v ole
*I ron G ates C omplex A tlas,
1 972,
p .
6 1;
G raf,
1 968.
H ISTORY O F R ESEARCH A T V LASAC In 1 961 t he g overnments o f t he Federated S ocialist R epublics o f Y ugoslavia a nd R omania s igned a j oint a d am a cross
t he Danube R iver
f or
a greement f or t he c onstruction o f t he
p urpose
o f
e lectrical
p ower
g eneration. The d am was t o b e l ocated a t t he d ownstream, o r e astern e nd, o f t he Iron Gates Gorge a nd would c ause a r ise i n water l evel i n t he
g orge
o f
up
t o
1 2
meters.
A s econd
a nticipated
e ffect
o f
t he
r aised water l evel was improved n avigation c onditions i n t he Gorge. T he p re-dam Gorge 's waters were c haracterized b y d angerous c urrents a nd w hirlpools. T he e ventual f looding o f
t he G orge a lso m eant p ermanent a lteration
i n p lant and animal c ommunities d estruction o f h uman s ettlements
b oth o n l and and i n t he water,
o n b oth b anks.
a rcheological s ites h ad n ever b een d one o n e ither b ank, s ites
k nown were a f ew c ave s ites h igh u p o n
t he p rojected water l evel . s alvage a s p ossible
b efore
a nd t he o nly
t he R omanian s ide -a bove
F unds were a llocated b y b oth g overnments
much i nformation o n p lants a nd a nimals,
p rojected f or
c ompletion
o f
t he
d am
and
S ystematic s urveys f or
a nd
i ncluding h umans,
f looding
o f
t he
t o a s
Gorge,
1 971.
The s urvey methods u sed b y a rcheologists o n t he Romanian a nd o n t he
Yugoslav
s hores
a re
n ot
d escribed
c haracterized a s " systematic" ( Nandris,
i n
p rint,
1 972).
e xcept
b y
b eing
On t he Yugoslav s ide
o nly t hree p re-Neolithic s ites, P adina , L epinski V ir , a nd V lasac , were d iscovered, and a ll l ay a t water's e dge. T he excavation o f V lasac, c arried
o ut
B elgrade
under
u nder
P hilosophical
t he
t he
F aculty,
c ontinued f or o ne
a uspices
d irection
U niversity
m ore s eason :
o f
o f
The
Drs. o f
1 971.
Archeological D .
S rejovi6
B elgrade , A fter t he
was
I nstitute
a nd
b egun
Z . i n
c ompletion o f
o f
L etica, 1 970 ,
a nd
t he 1 971
s ummer s eason t he waters b egan t o r ise, a nd t he s ite was s oon c overed . N o a ttempts a t f urther r ecovery f rom t he s ubmerged s ite h ave b een m ade s ince
t hat
t ime.
1 6
E XCAVATION M ETHODS T he s ite o f V lasac i s . 57 ( 65 -
meters
above
l ocated
s ea
l evel)
o n
t he
a t
l owest
a p lace
t errace
where
o f
t hat
t he D anube t errace
i s
c ircumscribed b y s teep s lopes t o a l ength o f 1 00 m eters a nd a w idth o f 4 0 meters. The l ong axis o f t he t errace p arallels t he r iver, which f lows
WNW—ESE
a t
t his
p oint.
The
e xcavation
g rid
o f
t he
s ite
was
a ccordingly l aid o ut WNW—ESE b y S SW—NNE, a nd t he s ite was d ug i n 4x4 m eter s quares. The b rief was
e xcavation
s easons,
a nd
s ubdivided
o f
V lasac
e nded
b y
was
t he
a s alvage
o peration ,
r ising waters
i nto 3 s ectors:
W estern ,
o f
l imited
t he D anube .
C entral,
s ystem
f or
m ay b e
i gnored i n a nalyzing t he s ite .
t he
s quares
F igure
3 s hows
t he
i s
c ontinuous,
l ayout
o f
s o
t hat
i n
e ach
The n umbering
t he 3 s ector s ubdivision
A t otal o f
e xcavated
t wo s ite
a nd E astern ,
o f which a variable n umber o f s quares was e xcavated.
t o
T he
s quares
6 40m
w ith
were e xcavated .
2
1 76
s quare
m eters
f alling i n t he Western s ector, 2 24 i n t he C entral s ector, a nd 2 40 i n t he Eastern s ector. The p rovenience o f V ertical
c ontrol
S TRATIGRAPHY) c ontrol
was
l evels.
T he
t o
b e
r elated
t o
t hickness
s ubdivide
t he o f
l ocating t hese
v ertical
c oncentrations
s ifting was d one. s oil
d istinguished
j udgment
Excavation was
d etailed
s ystematic .
r ecorded b y 4x4 F our
o f
l evels
c ultural
t he
materials v aried
meter s quare.
o ccupations
s ite,
within
a cross
t he
( see
a nd v ertical t hese
n atural
s ite ,
r anging
o f v arying t hickness were
u nits,
more
o r
l ess
f inely,
t he e xcavators.
c arried o ut u sing h and o f
m aterial ,
a nd
s hovels
t rowels i n
i n s quares
l ess
r ich
a reas.
with N o
F eatures were d rawn a nd p hotographed i n s itu, and
p rofiles
S rejovi6 a nd L etica,
o f
d istinct
t hroughout
a nd a rbitrary v ertical l evels
a ccording t o t he
h eavy
a ll f inds was
l ess
c ould
u p t o 2 m eters, u sed
was
were
d rawn
1 978).
1 7
f or
a ll
a reas
o f
t he
s ite
( see
1
6 650
,
6 4 50 .,
6 ,00 —
-6 351 —
•6 1
• b
. 1
—
456 , 24
• ••• •• • •• ••
d eDa n ub e
F igure 3 :
P lan V iew o f E xcavation U nits a t V lasac * F rom S rejoviC a nd L etica, 1 8
1 978,
*
F igure 1
S TRATIGRAPHY _N ine s trata, i ncluding t he b asement r ock, a re d escribed f or t he V lasac t errace, b eginning w ith t he o ldest, n umber 1 . F igure 4 p rovides av ertical p rofile o f t he r elations b etween t hese s trata ( MarkoviC 'M arjanovi , 1 978; S rejovi a nd L etica, 1 978). S tratum I S tratum I c onsists o f s teeply t ilted l imestone b edrock which m akes u p t he B oljetin H ill which l ies d irectly b ehind t he s ite . T his s tratum i s e xposed i n s ome p laces a bove t he s ite, a nd i s t he s ource o f s cree a nd b oulders which o ccur i n l ater s trata . A meander, 2 32 meters a cross, w as c ut i nto t his s tratum b y t he D anube. S tratum I I During t he e arly R iss g laciation t he m eander c ut i nto S tratum I b egan t o f ill w ith s cree a nd l oess a nd f ormed S tratum I I. T his S tratum i s b right y ellow i n c olor. During t he Würm Interstadial, t he water l evel i n t he D anube r ose , a nd t he r iver c ut i nto S tratum I I, f orming a n ew d epression 2 0 m eters d eep a nd o ver 1 00 m eters w ide . What r emains o f S tratum I I v aries i n t hickness m eters l ong b y 1 0 m eters d eep.
f rom
. 5
t o
1 5
meters
a nd
i s
1 00
S tratum I II
with
I n t he e arly Würm t he d epression c ut i nto S tratum I I b egan t o f ill l arge p olygonal b locks o f J urassic l imestone a nd s maller s cree ,
a ll with s harp e dges, i n a matrix o f l oess a nd f ormed S tratum I II. S tratum I II i s m ottled y ellow i n c olor . D uring t he n ext i nterstadial, t he D anube o nce a gain r ose a nd c ut a nother d epression , t his t ime i nto S tratum I II. T his d epression i s a bout 1 00 m eters l ong . What r emains o f S tratum I II v aries i n t hickness l ong b y 2 0 m eters d eep.
f rom
1 -15
m eters
a nd
i s
1 82
m eters
S tratum I V S tratum I V i s t he f irst s tratum c ontaining c ultural r emains,
t hose
a ssigned t o V lasac I a . T rapezoidal h ouse f loors w ith a r ed l imestone p avement, e xcavated f ireplaces, b one a nd s tone a re mixed with s cree. T he s tratum h as t he m ottled y ellow c olor o f t he s cree . S tratum I V i s o nly f ound i n t he l owest d epressions o f t he c ut-out b ase o n which i t l ies. I t i s n ot f ound i n t he m iddle a rea o f t he t errace, a nd o ccurs r arely
i n t he SW p eriphery.
I t v aries
i n t hickness
f rom
. 0
t o
. 70
m eters. ' Stratum V S tratum V c ontains t he c ultural r emains o f Vlasac l b. These i nclude r ed t rapezoidal h ouse f loors, s tone h earths , a nd a g reat a mount o f f ish b one . T hese c ultural r emains a re m ixed w ith s cree a nd h ardened l oess i n a b rown matrix . I t i s f ound i n t he s ame a reas o f t he s ite where S tratum I V i s f ound, a nd v aries i n t hickness f rom . 10 t o 1 .80 m eters.
1 9
4
I N , • _ e #4. 4 r lP ó • 4 . „ . A ee , L >
e
•
44 , ,
. ..
, ,
c :
, , .t ,
, ,
c
: / .
a :7
e 2,,,
p, .
c . c .,: › J , , . ., 2 . ‘ , .
' ' "
F igure 4 :
. 1 .' ' '
'
e
, , :,Z
‘ ,
« ,
.'
7 j e
!
"
" 1 " 1 111
>
11 1 1 1 1 11 1 :
: ;;
2: 2 ,,t, " :: , . ,: '% -:.2( 7)%, ,
. , : j . , -c .. . r: r : . . . . , . scv . . ;, . c . c, . „ . , . . . , %, . . , . . . ,. . . . . ,. . . . . .. . . . . . , .. . , .. .. . . :.. . . . . . . .. .
anub .e
. . . ..* .e 1 2 . 44,1
S tratigraphic P rofile o f V lasac* * F rom M arkovid-Marjanovid , 2 0
1 978,
F igure 3
S tratum V I S tratum V I c ontains t he c ultural r emains o f V lasac I I, which i nclude c ircular s tone r ings ( tent r ings?), h ouses, h earths made o f p laque-like s tones, s tone a nd b one. I t i s a d ark b rown , r ich h umus l ayer f illed with l arge b locks a nd s cree a nd v arying f rom . 10 t o 1 .40 meters i n t hickness. I t i s much more e xtensive t han S trata I V a nd V , o ccupying p art o f t he middle a rea o f t he t errace, a nd more o f t he p eriphery,
a nd i s t he o verall t hickest c ulture-bearing l evel. S tratum V II
S tratum V II o ccurred i n e very s quare which was e xcavated , a nd i s t hus t he m ost e xtensive c ulture-bearing l evel . I t i s t hickest i n t he w estern a nd c entral s ectors. T he c ultural r emains i nclude s tone r ings, h earths made o f c rude b locks, b ones a nd s tones, b elonging t o V lasac I II. This l evel i s a d ark b rown s oil c ontaining o ccasional l arge l imestone b locks . I n s ome p laces i t h as b een d amaged o r d estroyed b y l ater
( Neolithic) i nhabitants .
I t v aries
i n t hickness
f rom . 20
t o
1 .00
m eters. S tratum V III S tratum V III i s a d ark y ellowish l evel with s cattered l enses o f N eolithic a nd l ater c ultures. I t v aries i n t hickness f rom . 15 t o . 80 m eters. S tratum I X S tratum I X i s p ieces o f
s cree.
a d ark
I ts
r ed o r
b rown
t op
s oil
c ontaining
t hickness v aries f rom . 20 t o
2 1
o ccasional
. 30 m eters.
ARCHITECTURAL REMAINS AND POPULATION SIZE Architectural Remains The two main kinds of structural features at Vlasac were hearths and houses. In the first settlement, parts of 7 house floors, 9 hearths with stone walls, two open fireplaces, tw6 storie platforms, and a retaining wall around a central open platform were excavated ( see Figure 5). The first settlement has been sub-divided into 2 phases, to the earlier of which (la) have been assigned 4 houses and 2 hearths. Two of the Vlasac la houses were deeply dug into the terrace and had reportedly straight-sided walls. Both were only partially excavated but one is sufficiently exposed so as to strongly· suggest the trapezoidal shape (expanding toward the entrance, narrowing toward the end dug most deeply into the hillside) characteristic of later Vlasac houses, as well as houses at other settlements in the Iron Gates• Neither house contained a hearth, but less than half of the projected floor space of each was excavated. Both were filled with fish and other bone, and bone, antler, and stone tools in a matrix of red earth. Two other houses in the earliest .stratum were only partially dug into the hill, and had floors leveled with a mixture of crushed limestone, sand and clay. This flooring followed the contours of the house walls, but was inward from the walls by .5 to .6 meters, all the way around. Assuming the floor material indicated the actual living space, except for the stepped platform running the length of the northwest side, the dimensions of house 1 are 2 and 3 meters on the p arallel sides, and 2.7 and 2.56 m .. (;n the converging sides. The dimensions of the outer walls are 2 and 4 meters for the parallel sides, by 3.20 meters each for the converging sides. There are a number of probable postholes (14), all but two outside the limestone pavement, which may have supported a roof structure. There are also some groupings of large rock which might have supported roof beams. The depth to which the walls were cut into the then-existing land surface was .82 m. at the back and .1 m. at the front. In the north corner of the house an ellipsoidal hearth was cut into the raised bank which runs the rest of the length of the long (north- west) wall. The short (rear) wall is cut almost vertically; the long south-east wall is cut away from the house, making an ��gle of about 120 ° with the floor of the house. On this bas�s, the larger dimension of the house, measured to the walls cut into the hillside, should probably be taken as the living area. House 2 was larger, having parallel sides 4.5 and .8 m. long and converging sides 4.60 and 4.40 m. in length. The roof and wall construction of this house must have differed from House 1 as one of the converging sides was not dug in, but on level ground, and no post holes were reported. Two fireplaces, dug intn the earth and round to oval in plan view, were also associated with the earlier stage of Vlasac I (la). Like the hearths in Houses 1 and 2, both had burials close by . The later stage (Ib) of Vlasac I has houses which �re built on much flatter terrain, as the natural hollows of the terrace had already 22
c ia 02 3I Ii e b 4e V i
e v
4 v
in
I
2
3
. 4
5
6
7 8
1 0 1
b 3
1 3 1 4
b 2
c2
1 5 "
6
me m x
0 24 4 -
1 9
e r0
F igure 5 :
I
1 1
I
P lan o f F eatures A ssociated w ith V lasac I * *F rom S rejoviC a nd L etica, 1 978 2 3
0
5
1 0m
b een f illed b y V lasac I a h ouses. T he e xcavators b elieve t he l b h ouses a re l ater t han I a h ouses b ecause t here i s c ultural d ebris u nder t hem and y et n one o f t hem o verlap I a h ouses, s o i t i s a ssumed t hat t he I a houses were s till s tanding. l b h ouses a lso h ave r ectangular h earths with s tone walls f raming t hem , a nd t he h earths i n t he t wo h ouses w hich a re s ubstantially p reserved ( Houses 3 a nd 4 ) a re i n t he f ront-center o f t he h ouse i nstead o f a gainst o ne l ong wall a s i n I a h ouses. A ll I b h ouses a re o riented t owards t he r iver. T he e stimated d imensions o f House 3 ( which was i ncompletely e xcavated) a re: 4 .8 b y 1 .2 meters f or t he p arallel s ides, b y 4 meters f or t he t wo c onverging s ides. T he e stimates o f H ouse 4 d imensions a re 2 .50 a nd . 70 meters b y 3 .20 a nd 3 .50 meters. House 5 , o f which o nly t he h earth i s c learly p reserved, i s e stimated t o h ave h ad d imensions o f 4 i n . a nd 1 .2 m . f or t he p arallel s ides a nd 4 .05 a nd 5 meters f or t he c onverging s ides. The h earth i n t his h ouse i s wall a round
e llipsoid i n p lan a nd h as
t he t ypical Vlasac I b s tone
i t .
There i s o ne o pen f ireplace, e lliptical i n s hape a nd w ithout a s tone wall a round i t, which i s s tratigraphically p art o f l b . I t i s a lso a ssociated with a g rave. N ine o ther f ireplaces a ttributed t o s tage l b h ad s tone b orders a round t hem a nd were r ectangular o r e llipsoidal . I nasmuch a s t hese h earths a re i dentical t o h earths f ound i n h ouses, t hey a re a ssumed t o r epresent a ll t hat r emains o f h ouses, g iving a t otal o f 4 h ouses f or V lasac I a a nd 1 2 h ouses f or I b. A l imestone b lock wall, e stimated t o h ave b een a bout o ne meter h igh, may h ave s urrounded t he c enter o f t he s ettlement, p roducing a o h ouses w ere f ound b uilt o n t his p latform f lat p latform o f 1 000 m 2 . N d uring a ny was
o f
t he o ccupation p hases,
a lthough v ery
l ittle
o f
t his
a rea
e xcavated .
The s econd o ccupation, V lasac I I, ( see F igure 6 ) i ncluded t en h earth s tructures s imilar t o t he r ectangular h earths o f V lasac I . F our o f t hese were s urrounded b y t races o f d wellings s imilar t o t hose o f V lasac I , while s ix were n ot . T hese h earths r epresent l ess p ermanent s tructures o r d etached f eatures " out i n t he o pen" . T here were a lso e ight s tone g roupings . F our o r p ossibly 5 o f t hese were i nterpreted b y t he e xcavators a s s tone r ings t o s ecure t he e dges o f t ents with a verage d iameters o f 5 m eters . I nside a re s mall r ound a nd r ectangular p latforms o f r ock , i nterpreted a s w ork s paces a nd s leeping p latforms, r espectively . I t s eems u nlikely t hat p eople would c hoose t o s leep o n r ocks. T here a re n o f ireplaces w ithin t hese s tone r ings . T hree o ther s tone g roupings a re s mall c ircular s tone c lusters . ( There were a lso 2 o f t hese i n Vlasac l b which h ave b een i nterpreted a s o utdoor work a reas). V lasac I II
( see F igure 7 ) h ad s even r ectangular s tone-bordered
h earths, t hree o f which were a ssociated w ith t races o f s olid d wellings a s i n V lasac I a nd I I, a nd f our o f which were n ot. Three were a ssociated w ith s tone c oncentrations i nterpreted a s s tone r ings with i nterior r ectangular a nd c ircular s tone p avements i n t he i nterior o f two ( the t hird i s v ery f ragmentary), a s were f ound i n V lasac I I. Two o ther s tone s catters a re p ossibly r elated t o t riangular t ents o r a re o utdoor work a reas, a nd a f inal s tone s catter s uggests a 4 meter s quare t ent o r work a rea. T here a re n o h earths i nside a ny o f t hese s tone
2 4
e
7 4 '
d
2 0
V I
1 4 7,
V I
2
I V I
4
5
6
7 8
1 0 1
9
g e« v
I V
0 4 I
1 2
1 *1
3 1 4 2
8 A
4 -
1
3
N
f P G
1
1 8
6 . 1 r 7 1 4
1 2 .h .10 . -n- I X
m 1
l I
Fi gure
6:
Plan
I( I
I
of
* From
Features Srejovi d
Associated and
2 5
Letica,
with 1978
t5 9 , t,
Vlasac
II*
i o rn
-25 —
x l v
f — E ) 16
3
D I 4 1 , +Ä -lee
1 L
6
5
7
8 ( XV
19
19
1
2
1 3 1 4 1 50
A
9
X V I I . J -
t
I
4
1 3»
I n I. f
I : II
F igure 7 : P lan o f F eatures A ssociated w ith V lasac I II* *F rom S rejoviC a nd L etica, 2 6
1 978
0
5
1 0m t .
p avements.
( SrejoviC a nd L etica,
1 978).
Overview a nd C omparisons A t Lepenski V ir a v ery l arge n umber o f h ouse f loors a nd h earths were p reserved. h ad v ery c lear
P roto-Lepenski V ir i s r epresented b y 8 d wellings which r ectangular s tone-bordered h earths b ut n o e vidence o f
cut-in walls, t ent s tones, post holes o r o ther c onstruction o f t he dwellings. V ery l ittle o f t his excavated.
Lepenski
Vir
I ,
which
has
b een
t races o f s ettlement
subdivided
t he was
into 5
o ccupations, I a-Ie, h ad 8 5 excavated h ouses. Houses were c onstantly b eing r enewed, a nd n ew h ouses b uilt, s ometimes o n t op o f o lder o nes-p roviding i ncludes
t he
2 2
d estruction c ontained
b asis
h ouses o f
s ome
u p
t rapezoidal .
f or
a nd ,
t o
a s ubdivision
o n
e arly
3 0
t he
h ouses
h ouses
H ouse f loors
b asis
o f
b y
i nto
f ive
s tages.
u nexcavated a reas
l ater
P hase
b uilding a ctivity ,
o riginally.
House
I a
a nd p robable
f loor
m ay h ave
s hapes
a re
w ere p oured f rom a h eated m ixture o f c rushed
l imestone, water, s and and g ravel which h ardened when i t c ooled, a nd c overed t he whole f loor a rea a nd h earth . t he 2 c onvergent s ides a nd t he s hort e nd , t hem
t o
f orm
t he
s loping
r oof
w hich
S teeper t renches s urrounded a nd p ost h oles were d ug i nto
b egan a t
o f many h ouses were d ug i nto t he h illside. t he
r iver.
l argest
F loor
( 28
s q.
a rea
v aried
meters)
f rom
h ouse
was
5 .50
g round All b ut
t o
2 8
l ocated
l evel .
s quare
i n
T he
b acks
two h ouses f aced
t he
meters.
middle
T he
o f
t he
s ettlement f acing a c entral s pace f ree o f h ouses, which was l eveled w ith a r etaining w all. Phase Ib i nvolved
t he r enovation o f 4 h ouses,
i ncluding
t he 2 8
s quare m eter o ne , a nd t he c onstruction o f 2 2 n ew h ouses, m ostly o n t op o f o ld o nes a nd t aking a dvantage o f t he f lat f oundation t hey p rovided , s ometimes
i ncreasing t he s ize o f
s eventeen h ouses
r emained i n u se,
t he
f loor-area.
During Phase
a nd t en n ew h ouses were b uilt .
I c,
Among
t hem were t wo n ew h ouses a s l arge a s t he o riginal l arge c entral o ne a nd two " miniature" h ouses with f loor a reas o f 1 .4 a nd 1 .9 s quare meters. These
l atter houses had n o d ebris
s eventeen n ew h ouses houses was r ebuilt.
o n t heir f loors.
During p hase I d
were b uilt, a nd o ne o f t he n ewer ( from I c) l arge The d istribution o f h ouse f loors s uggests a
s plitting o f t he s ettlement, with o ne l arger h ouse i n e ach h alf. D uring t his s tage, h earths b egan t o b e s urrounded, o n o ne o r b oth s ides,
b y
t riangles
o r
A 's,
made
f rom
with t he p oint t oward t he h earth. h ouses
i n s tage I c,
P hase l e s quare
s labs
o f
r ock,
a nd i n a ll I d h ouses.
i ncluded
meters) a s
v ertically s et
This a rrangement was f ound i n t wo
t he c onstruction o f a h uge n ew
well
a s
a n umber
o f
o ther
n ew
c entral h ouse
h ouses
o f
( 36
smaller
p roportions. Phase
I I
was
built
o n
t he
d eposits
o f
Phase
I --and
a ll
c onstruction was n ew. One l arge c entral h ouse a nd f ive smaller o nes h ave b een p reserved , a nd t here a re t races o f 3 8 o ther s tructures which were l argely d estroyed b y t he L epenski V ir t riangles o r A 's a round t he h earths s till o ccur, i s
g one.
2 7
I II o ccupation. The t he l imestone f looring
P hase I II a t L epenski V ir f eatured f ood p roduction a nd r adically a ltered h abitations--vaguely d escribed a s s emi-subterranean o val o r r ound h ouses . I t i s i mpossible t o a ssess t hese d escriptions ( Srejovi , . 1 972 ) T he s ite o f P adina c alled e arly N eolithic t he b asis o f p ottery b elieve Padina B t o b e
i s l ocated o n a l ong n arrow b each . P adina B i s b y t he e xcavator ( JovanoviC , 1 968) , l argely o n f ound o n h ouse f loors. O ther a rcheologists Mesolithic ( Srejovi a nd L etica, p .c.) . H ouse
f loors were l eveled with a y ellow c lay m ixture, r ectangular h earths with v ertical s tone s lab b orders s urrounded b y v ertical s tone s lab t riangles o r A 's, a nd a g reat mass o f f ish b ones c overed t he a reas around most hearths. Where preserved, the ground p lans are t rapezoidal . P adina A , w hich u nderlies B , i s d escribed a s h aving t he s ame a rchitectural c haracter ( Jovanovi , 1 969).
a nd
D escriptions o f a rchitectural r emains o n t he R omanian s ide a re f ew f ar b etween . V eterani T erasa, I coana I a a nd R azvrata I a a re
r eported t o h ave o val f loor p lans w ith c entral p ost h oles a nd c ircular h earths without b orders. S chela C ladovei I , I coana I b, Razvrata I b, a nd O strovul B anului I IIa h ave c ircular o r o val h earths w ith s tone b orders. R azvrata I I, S chela C ladovei I I, O strovul B anului I IIb, O strovu Mare I and I coana I I h ave s quare o r r ectangular h earths with s tone b orders i nside h ouses. P aved f loors o f r ed e arth , s and a nd c lay a re r eported f rom O strovul B anului . T here a re a lso c ircular u nbordered h earths o utside i n t he o pen a t t hese s ites. The v ery l ate s ite o f A libeg a lso h ad a r ectangular r ock-bordered h earth , b ut t he r ocks s how evidence o f s haping a nd t he whole s tructure h as b een p lastered o ver with s ome s ort o f c oating . T hese h earths a re i nside d wellings, a nd o ther s impler h earths a re i n t he o pen . A t O strovu Mare t he u pper l evel,
which i s d escribed a s h aving " baked c lay" h earths, m ay b e t he
s ame a s t hat d escribed f or C räciunescu, S tinga, 1 979).
Alibeg
( BoronealI,
1 973;
B oronearq,
The t emporal r elation b etween r ound o r o val a nd r ectangular h earths i s well-documented a t V lasac a nd h as b een u sed a s c entral evidence i n e stablishing t he r elative c hronology o f t he I ron Gates s ites. This c hronology i s e vidence a vailable, i t s eems
d iscussed c lear t hat
b elow. On t he b asis o f t he t he w hole s equence o f s ites i n
t he I ron Gates a rchitecturally l ooks l ike t he work o f a s ingle p opulation which c ontinued t hrough s everal t housand y ears t o o ccupy t his
r egion. P opulation S ize S ix h undred a nd
f orty
s quare
m eters
w ere
e xcavated
o n
t he V lasac
T errace, a nd t he e xcavators s tate t hat e ach s ettlement o ccupied a bout 2 ,000 s quare m eters . T he t errace i tself i s d escribed a s m easuring 3 00 b y 2 0 meters, which would p rovide 6 000 s quare m eters o f u tilizable s pace . A ccording t o s everal p ublished g round p lans, h owever , t he w idth o f t he t errace f rom t he r iver 's e dge i s a t l east 4 0 meters i n t he c entral a rea o f t he s ite. N o r eason i s g iven f or a ssuming t hat t he i nhabitants o f V lasac n ever u sed m ore t han o ne t hird o f t heir g ently s loping r iver t errace. I t s hould b e r emembered t hat water l evels a t t he t ime o f t he Vlasac o ccupations were l ower t han a t p resent, which
2 8
w ould h ave w idened t he t errace f urther. I f we t ake 6 000 s quare meters a s a c onservative f igure f or t he l and a vailable f or s ettlement, t hen i t i s p ossible t hat o nly s lightly more t han t en p ercent o f t he s ite h as b een e xcavated, i f e ach h abitation u tilized t he whole t errace . I f we t ake t he e xcavator 's f igure o f 2 000 s quare m eters, t hen t hirty-two p ercent o f t he s ite h as b een e xcavated.
S ince p rovenience was r ecorded i n 4 meter s quares,
r ecorded a rtifact d istributions a re n ot v ery s ensitive t o r elations b etween h ouse f loors a nd a rtifact d ensity . E stimating t he p opulation o f V lasac r eally b ecomes g uesswork when a ll o f t hese v ariables a re a dded t o t he a lready q uestionable m ethods o f e stimating p opulation s ize f rom a rcheological r emains. H assan ( 1981, p .67) h as n oted t hat o ften o bserved i n walled s ettlements .
h igher p opulation d ensities a re A lthough V lasac i s n ot walled ,
i ts l ocation o n a r iver t errace walled i n n aturally b y s teep s lopes would p lace t he s ame c onstraints o n h ouse s pacing, a lthough i n t his c ase t he t errace m ight w ell h ave b een l arge e nough f or t he s ize o f t he g roup s o t hat i t would h ave p osed n o s uch s tricture . We c an make s everal e stimates o f p opulation s ize b ased o n d ifferent e stimates o f t he t otal n umber o f h ouses which were s imultaneously o ccupied. Most o f t he work o n e stimating p opulation s ize f rom h abitation a rea h as b een d one i n t he American S outhwest where t here i s h istoric c ontinuity t o modern p opulations, o r o n o ther p opulations which p racticed f arming a nd a nimal b reeding ( Hill, 1 970; L ongacre, 1 976; H assan, 1 981; P log, 1 975). T hese c ases a re n ot o f o bvious r elevance h ere . O thers h ave a ttempted t o g et m ore g enerally a pplicable e stimates o f h abitation s pace p er p erson b y d eveloping a verages o f w idespread e thnographic s amples ( Naroll, 1 962; Wiessner, 1 974; C ook a nd H eizer 1 965, 1 968; C ook, 1 972). L e B lanc ( 1971) h as s hown t hat t he r elationship b etween f loor a rea a nd f amily units i s a v ery l oose a nd v ariable o ne. In V lasac I a 4 house f loors were e xcavated. The f loor a reas o f Houses 1 a nd 2 were 9 m' a nd 1 0.4m', r espectively. House l a was t oo f ragmentary f or a ny s ize e stimate, a s was House 2 a, a lthough 2 a was e xcavated s ufficiently t o s uggest a h ouse s ubstantially l arger t han er H ouse 2 . F rom t his i t s eems r easonable t o a ccept a f igure o f 1 0m 2 p h ouse f or V lasac I a . V lasac l b c onsisted o f 3 h ouse f loors , h ouse 3 , 4 a nd 5 with f loor a reas o f 1 1.8m 2 , 4 .96m 2 a nd 1 0.4m 2 , r espectively. T here were a lso n ine h earths which t he e xcavators i nterpret a s h aving o nce b een i nside d wellings, f or a t otal o f 1 2 h ouses i n l b . I t d oes n ot c larify t he p recise s ituation t o a verage t he s mall H ouse 4 i n w ith t he o ther t wo . T his w as c learly a d welling f or a s maller f amily o r a n i ndividual,
o n a d ifferent s cale t han t he o thers.
T he h ouses r iver . e ach,
o f V lasac I a
I f V lasac I a
i ndeed
& b a re m ore o r l ess o riented t owards t he c onsisted
o f
o nly
4 h ouses
a veraging
1 0m
2
t hen u sing C ook 's ( 1972) f ormula we would p redict 4 t o 5p eople
p er h ouse, f or a maximum o f a bout 2 0 p eople.
T his s eems a b it small,
b elow t he magic n umber f or s urvival ( Wobst, 1 974), a nd a lso s mall i n c onsideration o f t he v ery r ich r iverine r esources available . V lasac I b , with 1 2 houses, would h ave c ontained 5 0 t o 6 0 p eople. I f t he
2 9
e xcavators
a re
c orrect
t hat
t he h ouses
o f I a w ere s till i n u se w hen I b
h ouses were b uilt, we h ave a s ettlement o f b etween 6 0 a nd 8 0 p eople. l b h ouses were n ever b uilt o verlapping I a h ouses. H owever , t his c ould e asily b e b ecause I a h ouses were i n a s tate o f c ollapse a nd were a bandoned , b ut were n ot y et c onsolidated a dequately e nough t o b e b uilt u pon . I t s eems m ore l ikely t hat a t l east a f ew m ore I a h ouses e xisted a nd t hat I b r epresented a n i mmediately s ubsequent b uilding p hase o f a g rowing s ettlement. I nterpretation V lasac
I I
r epresents
s ome
s ort
o f
s hift,
p ossibly
f rom p ermanent
t o s easonal o ccupation , o r p erhaps a m ore c omplicated c ombination o f s easonal u se s hifts a nd c ultural c hanges. T he 1 0 h earths l ike t hose a ssociated w ith h ouses i n V lasac I c ould b e c onverted i nto a p opulation o f 4 0 t o 5 0 p eople . T his l eaves u naccounted f or t he 5 m . d iameter s tone " tent" r ings, w ith n o e vidence o f f ire t o s upport t heir i dentification a s d wellings. T he e xcavators b elieve t he " tent" r ings i ndicate a s hift t o s easonal u tilization o f t he s ite . H owever , t he n umber o f a rtifacts , s tone a nd b one t ools, e tc . m ore t han d oubles f rom V lasac I t o I I . T he s tone " tent" r ings more l ikely r epresent s ome n ew c onstruction t echnique f or y ear—round h abitations. T he f act t hat t hey l ack f ireplaces i s p roblematic. A s hift f rom n uclear f amily t o e xtended f amily—focused f ood p reparation would n ot e xplain t his c ompletely, s ince f ires would s till b e d esirable f or warmth d uring t he winter. Another p ossibility i s t hat t hose s tone r ings r epresent t he r emains o f s torage f acilities--perhaps s moked f ish s tored a nd c overed c arefully with r ocks t o k eep t he d ogs away. T he r elatively s mall n umber o f h ouses c ould a lso b e d ue t o t he l ocation o f t he b ulk o f t he V lasac I I s ettlement o n p arts o f t he t errace which were n ot e xcavated. I t i s i nteresting t hat t he f loor a rea o f t he 5 meter d iameter s tone " tent" s r ight i n t he m iddle o f t he s ize r ings c omes o ut t o 1 0.71 m 2 which i r ange o f t he t rapezoidal h ouse f loors . I f t hese a re d wellings l ike t he housefloors with h earths, t hen s ome f ifteen " households" a re r epresented w ith a t otal o f 6 0 t o 7 5 i nhabitants. • V lasac I II, l ike Vlasac I I, i s a mixture o f r ectangular s tone b ordered h earths s uggesting h ouses ( there a re 7 ), 3 " tent" r ings, 2 p ossible t riangular t ent b ases a nd a p ossible 4 m eter s quare t ent b ase , a ll without h earths . I f t hese a re a ll h abitations, i t would s uggest a p opulation o f 5 0-60 p eople. • This s light d ecline i s i n l ine w ith t he c reased a mount o f o ccupational d ebris a ssociated w ith V lasac I II. d e-
t he
I t i s n ot p ossible t o b e c onclusive a bout t he s ize o r n ature o f t hree o ccupations a t V lasac. T he l imits o f t he s ite were n ot
d etermined, a nd t he f aunal a nalysis, which d id n ot s eparate t he m aterial i nto t he t hree o ccupational p eriods , a lso d id n ot r eport a ge d istributions o r o ther i nformation which c an t hrow l ight o n t he q uestion o f s easonality. A r eanalysis o f t he f aunal material with t hese q uestions i n m ind would b e e xtremely v aluable . T he m ain r eason f or i nterpreting V lasac I a s a p ermanent s ettlement i s t he s olidity a nd e laborateness
o f
t he h ouses--which
i s
i ndeed
c onvincing .
O n t he
o ther
h and , e qually o r more s olid c onstructions , b uilt e ntirely o f w ood , o r wood a nd s od , c ould l eave n o t race,--though t hey h ad h oused a g rowing , p ermanently r esident p opulation.
3 0
B ased o n t he s heer m ass o f c ultural d ebris, i t i s u nreasonable t o i nterpret V lasac I I a s a t emporary s ite which f it i nto a s easonal r ound -i t was a much m ore i ntensive o ccupation t han V lasac I . T he s tone " tent" r ings p robably d o r epresent a n ew t ype o f h ouse--but a y ear r ound h ouse, n ot a s ummer t ent. I f s o, t hen we h ave e vidence f or a 3 s tage o ccupation which g rew t o ap eak i n Vlasac I I, with p erhaps 1 00 o ccupants ( assuming s ome h ouse r emains e xisted u nder t he 6 7-90% o f t he s ite which was n ot e xcavated) a nd w as s omewhat s maller d uring t he f inal o ccupation. T his i nterpretation i gnores t he q uestion o f c ontinuous, r epeated o r i solated o ccupations ( Hassan , 1 981). I t i s u nlikely t hat s uch s ubstantial s helters would b e b uilt f or r epeated t emporary v isits. F urther , p opulation c oncentrations a re well d ocumented f or c oastal a nd r iverine s ettings ( ibid , 1 80) , a nd h unting g roups i n s uch s ettings i s N orthwest
s edentism f or f ishing-gathering a nd well k nown-as m ost f amously o n t he
C oast-the Kwakiutl , H aida ,
T lingit,
e tc .
A nother p ossibility
i s t hat e ach s tage i n f act i s a n a ccumulation o f a n umber o f smaller and b riefer o ccupations which o ccurred o ver a s hort t ime p eriod . I f t his were t he c ase o ne would e xpect o verlap o f h ousefloors a nd r e-use o f h earth b order s tones t o h ave o ccurred, b ut t here i s n o e vidence o f t his. I nterpretation o f t he s ite a s 3 d istinct a nd d iscrete l arge, p ermanent o ccupations t hus s eems m ost r easonable . E vidence f or y earr ound o ccupation o f Mesolithic s ites i n o ther p arts o f E urope , s uch a s Mount S andel i n N orthern I reland, a nd a t Ertebdlle s ites i n S outhern S candinavia ( Price, 1 983) make t his interpretation s eem more a cceptable . C lasen ( 1980, p .171) h as i ndicated t hat t he f aunal r emains f rom P adina i ndicate y ear-round o ccupation , a nd B olomey a rgues t he s ame i nterpretation f or t he s ite o f I coana ( Bolomey 1 973, p .51). R ecent l iterature
( cf. P rice a nd B rown,
1 985) h as
i ncreasingly a rgued f or
g reater d iversity a nd c omplexity o f h unter-gather i ncluding s edentism , o n a world-wide s cale .
3 1
a daptations,
C HRONOLOGY A ND D ATING T he I ron G ates S ites R elative d ates a nd a n a bsolute t ime f rame f or t he Mesolithic i n Europe a re unevenly d eveloped . Locally, c hronological o rderings o f s ites b ased o n t ype c omparisons o f a rtifacts a re f requently b ounded o r c entered a round a f ew r adio-carbon d ates . F requently s ites h ave b een d ated b y only one o r two s amples, g reatly d iminishing t heir r eliability . I n t his r espect, V lasac i s a n e xception , h aving a s eries o f 1 5 d ates f or l evels I -III o n s tratigraphically s ecure m aterial ( see T able 6 ). C omparison with t he d ates f or L epenski V ir i s i nteresting ( see T able 7 ) . A s t he a uthors p oint o ut, a ll o f t he d ates f or V lasac I a re i nconsistently r ecent; t he V lasac I I s eries a nd t he o ne V lasac I II d ate f orm a c onvincing s eries . A dditionally , t he p roblematic V lasac I d ates, r anging f rom 4 800 t o 5 800 B .C. ( uncorrected) c over t he t ime r ange o f t he Lepenski V ir d ates 4 600-5400 B .C. T he e xcavators h ave s uggested t hat t he l owest l evels a t b oth s ites h ave b een r epeatedly c ontaminated w ith g round water , t hus y ielding m isleadingly r ecent CI' d ates ( Srejovi a nd Letica, 1 978) . On t hat b asis, t he a uthors t hrow o ut
t he V lasac I and a ll
o f
t he L epenski V ir d ates,
a nd a ttempt t o
f inish t he d iscussion o f d ating V lasac b y c omparing a rcheological a ssemblages f rom e arly V lasac w ith o ther d ated m aterial. S tuckenrath ( p .c . , 1 982) a sserts t hat g roundwater c ontamination i s n ot a p ossible e xplanation f or t he u nacceptably r ecent d ates y ielded b y V lasac I a nd b y L epenski V ir . T he m ost r ecent r adiocarbon c alibration . . ( Klein e t a l , 1 982, p . 1 10) r eports t he " .maximum d eviations b etween u ncalibrated c onventional r adiocarbon d ates a nd c alendric d ates o ccur c a 5 200 B .C." . This maximum d eviation o ccurs i n t he m iddle o f t he r ange o f d ates i n q uestion , a nd s uggests t he p ossibility o f a major p hysical e vent t emporarily a ltering t he a mount o f r adioactive c arbon d uring t he t ime s pan . S ince L epenski V ir i s widely b elieved t o c orrespond
t emporally
t o V lasac
I I
a nd I II,
h owever ,
t his
e xplanation
i s a lso i nadequate. I f
t he V lasac I d ates
w ere
c orrect,
t hen t he V lasac I I d ates,
a nd
t he o ne d ate f rom V lasac I II would h ave t o b e i ncorrect , s ince t here i s c lear , u ndisturbed s uper-positioning o f t hese t hree l evels o ver m ost o f t he s ite . T hat would p lace t he whole s equence a t V lasac within t he t ime s pan o f t he N eolithic i n t his a rea . A lthough i t i s n ot d ifficult t o imagine t he p ersistence o f a c ollecting a nd h unting a dapted p eople s urrounded b y f armers ( as f or e xample, t he M buti o f t he I turi F orest) , o ne would e xpect s ome e vidence o f c ontact
t o a ppear a fter a n o ccupation
a nd c o-residence ( at V lasac) o f m ore t han 1 000 y ears . T here i s n o s uch evidence, n ot a s heep b one, n ot a s herd . F urthermore, t he s kimpy r emains o f V lasac I V r est o n t op o f V lasac I II, a nd a re e arly N eolithic ( Star nvo) . Ground-water c ontamination i s n ot t he a nswer, h ut i t i s n evertheless
c lear o n l ogical g rounds
t hat
i t
i s t he V lasac I d ates
w hich m ust b e r ejected. V lasac I a
a nd
b a re
d ated b y S rejovi
a nd Letica ( 1978) o n t he
b asis o f c omparison with d ated R omanian s ites . I coana I a w ith a d ate o f 6 315 ± 1 00 B .C. i s e quated a rcheologically t o Vlasac a , a nd O strovul B anului
I II,
w ith
t wo d ates
3 2
o f
6 090
+ 1 60 B .C .
a nd 5 615
± 1 00
T ABLE 6 U NCORRECTED-CONVENTIONAL D ATES F OR V LASAC
A ge
Q uadrant
V lasac I II
L ab N o.
R esult
A /II
B ln-1954
5 490
± 6 0 B .C.
b /g
B ln-1168
5 525
± 6 0 B .C.
I I
b /18
B ln-1052
5 660
± 6 0 B .C.
I I
b /9
Z -267
5 609
± 9 3 B .C.
I I
c /9
B ln-1169
5 715
± 6 0 B .C.
I I
c /III
B ln-1050
5 985
± 6 0 B .C.
I I
c /III
L j-2047a
5 975
± 7 7 B .C.
V lasac I I
( end)
I I
( beginning)
A /II
L j-2047b
5 980
± 7 7 B .C.
l b
( end)
d /5
B ln-1171
5 880
± 1 00 B .C.
B C/V
B ln-1170
5 890
± 1 00 B .C.
B ln-1053
4 915
± 1 00 B .C.
B ln-1014
4 855
± 1 00 B .C.
B ln-1951
4 955
± 1 00 B .C.
. 4840
+ 1 00 B .C.
l b l b
l b
a /18
C /III
B ln-1051a l b
C /III
Z -262
( Srejovi
&L etica,
3 3
5 050
1 978,
± 9 0 B .C.
p .129).
.
P I
P c 1
P = 1
A c t
0 r 4 ' . 0 . 2-
0 00 / 4 1 . 0 4-
0 N . CO . , 1-
0 N. VO . I.
0 N. CO
t f ) C T \ CO
s e
CD P 1 C T \
s e
C
C D 0 4 -
C C
0 0 r 4
0 0 4 I
C C
+ 1
+ 1
0 CN OD / 4 1 0
V 1 .. . CO V i D
VD
L f 1 N. L t 1
CT 4% . 0 1
r I P C 1
H P I
7 4 1 4
0 0 , 1 + 1
• O Z
L i j
4
1 • 1
P Z I
•
C . )
C C
0 C V CO ' . 0
se L t ) vD 1
ri P Z
•
CZ )
C
H
0 , I 01 r,
0 VD 01 r . . .
cn Ln VD 1
C d 0 4N . 1
C ) . 0 4N. I
r I P I C I
H P I
T 1 P C 1
C
C O
C O
C O
c o
C l )
c o Z (. ) 4
c o Z C . )
C O
c o
C O
C O
C l )
a )
a )
a)
C l ) Z C . ) 4
a)
C . ) 3 1
C . ) 4
C . ) 4 .
0'
0'
0'
0'
0'
/ 4 1 0 -
r -,
/ 4 1 0 / 4 1 0 -
. r•/ 4 1 0 . .
N/ 4 1 0 "• -
a)
C l )
T • • • •
/ 4 1 0 . . / 4 1 0
4/43 House 3
0
-H
c o
•
C O
f4
+ 1
c o
H H
•
( : ) 4
E , i
N.
, . 0
•
C ) 4
CO N. VD 1
0 0 4 1
c o
•
C . ) W
4 4
C
0 0 P 1
, I P C 1
U /4
/ 4 1 0 0
C
C C
r I P : 1
c o
N.
C
C C
r I • P C 3
C l )
N.
Ö
C C
, 4 • P I
c o
/ 4 1 0 . . . . H
C C
L E I
VD 1
C l )
a)
s e
N. . 1 " v Z, 1
C O
a )
. , U .
r s .
C O
C . ) > 4
. C ) . .
Ln
vD 1
C S )
.
L n
C O
L ocation
UNCORRECTED
r x )
L. r 1 L n vD 1
H
H ouse I X
F OR L EPENSKI V IR*
0 VD L . r 1 \ O
.
( 5360 B .C.)
. P i l
.
0 .
( 4950 B .C.)
. U
. P O
. 0
( 4850 B .C.)
. C . )
a )
( . ) t• 1
P 0'
0'
0'
N/ 4 1 0 -
0 3 / 4 1 0 .
CO /0 4 1 .
N. C.)
. 1 .IA
VD C I )
a ) C O Z 0 =
a ) C O
\ I D 4 4
C T %
. 4 4
N . CI
C ) C l ) Z O =
c 1 ) C l ) Z 0 =
C ) c o Z 0 =
1 ) c o
c 1 ) C O
C ) C l )
0 =
0 =
0 =
• H
( i ) H
" c 1 H
H
1 : 1 H
1 . 1 1
a)
•
a)
, i L n
In
•
a )
/ 4 1 0 c • A
e 4
Z P C )
•
/ 4 1 0 . . ". C O
Cn
01 N. cn I
CT
C c ) . 1
0 =
Cn 14
i c h 0 c • 1 .
a .
. C N r s • ( 7 1 r f e T O 4 ) . 1 ) 4 1 C Y i c
B .C.,
i s
e quated
with
Vlasac
l b.
T hese
t hree
d ates
a re
n ot
i nconsistent with t he V lasac I I d ates, e xcept t hat t he y ounger d ate f rom O strovul B anului I II o verlaps V lasac I I b y a s ubstantial m argin ( c. 3 00 y ears). T he o ther l imit o f V lasac, t he e nd o f Vlasac I II a nd t he Mesolithic, i s t aken a s b eing l imited b y t he well-established b eginning o f t he N eolithic i n t he a rea ( Proto-StarC/e vo) a t 5 200-5000 B. C. S rejovi a nd L etica ( 1978) s ee t he o verall c ultural d evelopment i n t he I ron G ates Gorge i n t he c ontext o f European p rehistory i n f ive s tages : 1 ) t he l ate P aleolithic i n t he I ron G ates, e xemplified b y C uina T urcului I , which was t he d irect b ase f rom which t he L epenski V ir c ulture s prang; 2 )a t wo-stage t ransitional p hase, o ccurring i n t he i nitial p ost-pleistocene a nd e xemplified b y C uina Turcului I I i n t he e arlier p hase, a nd V eterani T erasa i n t he s econd p hase ; 3 ) t he L epenski V ir c ulture proper , which c an b e s ubdivided i nto f our p hases o n t he b asis o f t he s tratigraphy o f V lasac; 4 ) s econd t ransitional p hase, s howing e vidence o f c ontact with t he f irst f armers, i llustrated b y A libeg; 5 ) e arly N eolithic o r p roto-StarC 'evo, f ound a t L epenski V ir. F urther d etails o f t his c hronology m ay b e s een i n T able 8 . The
evidence
f or
T able
8 i s
q uite
m ixed--some
o f
i t
s eems
e xtremely r eliable , f or e xample , t he s uper-positi md l ayers a t V lasac , d ates. w hich a re a dditionally s upported b y a s eries o f CI S tages 4 a nd 5 , a t l east i n t heir r elative o rdering , a lso s eem u nequivocal, d istinguished a s t hey a re b y s poradic, a nd t hen c lear e vidence o f a N eolithic e conomy . T he r elative p ositioning o f s ites i n ates f or t his s tage S tage 3 i s l ess o bvious, t here a re v ery f ew C14 d 4 d ates , a nd s everal e xcept f or V lasac I I . Most o f t he s ites h ave n o C1 h ave
o nly
o ne
o r
t wo .
T he
c hronological
o rdering h ere h as
b een b ased
o n c omparisons o f a rcheological m aterials, a s f or e xample i n e quating I coana I a with V lasac I a ( Srejovi6 a nd L etica, 1 978, p .130) . T he s ame method h as y ielded a s lightly d ifferent o rdering f or B oroneant T able
( see
9 b elow) .
• T hough t he b roader o utlines o f t his c hronology a re n ot d isputed , m any d etails a re . P Xunescu ( 1970) i nterprets b oth C uina T urcului I a nd I a s p ost-glacial , whereas S rejovi -Letica a rgue t hat C uina T urcului I I i s aP leistocene s ite. T here i s a s terile l ayer b etween l evels I a nd I which a verages a bout o ne meter i n t hickness ( Pgunescu 1 970, p .5). I P ollen d iagrams f rom t he t wo l evels a re q uite d ifferent a nd a re a menable t o d ifferent i nterpretations ( see P REHISTORIC F LORAL R EMAINS) . T here a re o nly t wo C1 4
d ates
f or t he d isputed l evel :
S tratum I I
P inus s p.
B ln-802 = 8 175 ± 2 00 B .C.
S tratum I S tratum I
P inus s p. P inus s p.
B ln-803 = 1 0650 ± 1 20 B .C. B ln-804 = 1 0100 + 1 20 B .C. ( Päunescu,
F aunal
e vidence
c hanges
f rom
l evel
1 970,
I t o
p .29)
l evel I I
( see PREHISTORIC
FAUNAL R EMAINS); t he s ame s pecies a re p resent, b ut t heir p ercentage i mportance s hifts . F ish s eem t o i ncrease , a s d o i bex , c hamois, wolf , a nd B os
s p.
Swine, b eaver, e lk, marten , a nd b ear d ecrease.
3 5
Only t he
T ABLE 8 C HRONOLOGY A ND D ATING O F T HE I RON G ATES S ITES A CCORDING T O L ETICA A ND S REJOVI6, 1 978
S tage 5
Uncorrected C 14 D ates B .C.
S ites V lasac I V; L epenski V ir I II; C uina T urcului l ila;
5 495
± 1 80
E xternal C hronological C onnections E arly N eolithic i n a rea c . 5 2005 000 B .C.
L jubcova;
G ornea;
S tubica
4
A libeg
3
V lasac I II; L epenski V ir I I;
5 490-5200
C rvena S tijena I V; O dmut l b
5 980-5525
F ranchthi L ate M esolithic
V lasac I b; O strovul B anului Ina; P adina A
6 090-5615
E ger
V lasac I a; I coana I a; S chela C ladovei I
6 315
S chela C ladovei I I; I coana I I; O strovul B anului I IIb V lasac I I; L epenski V ir I ; P adina B ; H ajdu ` Cka V odenica
B oreal 2 b
V eterani T erasa; O strovul B anului I a nd I I
2 a
. 2 00 8 1751-
C uina T urcului ha & b ; Bile
C rvena S tijena V II-V O dmut l a F ranchthi E arly
H erculane I I
M esolithic P leistocene 1
C uina T urcului I
1 0,650
3 6
± 1 20
T ABLE 8 ( CONT'D)
S tage
A ller d o sc.
S ites
U ncorrected C 14 D ates B .C.
D anube G ravettian ( Medit.) G ravettian , U pper D anube f inal M agdalenian, S . R ussian S teppes U . P aleo.
3 7
E xternal C hronological C onnections
T ABLE
9
C HRONOLOGY AND DATING O F T HE I RON GATES S ITES ACCORDING T O B ORONEANT
S tage
( 1968,
1 973,
1 980)
D ates Uncorrected,
S ites
I V
A libeg, O strovul M are I II
5 245
±
II I
V lasac I II; O strovul M are I I; S chela C ladovei I I;
6 090 ±
B .C. 1 00
1 60 B .C.
I coana I I; O strovul B anului I IIb; R azvrata I I V lasac I I; Mare I ;
O strovul
O strovul
5 649 B .C. 5 908 B .C.
C orbului I II I I
V lasac I ;
I coana I ;
655 ± 6
2 50
8 175
2 00
O strovul B anului IIa; R azvrata I ; I V eterani T erasa; S chela C ladovei I ; P eetera V eterani V eterani T erasa C uina T urcului I I;
±
B ile Herculane I I P leistocene
1 0,650 ±
C limente I I; O strovul B anului I a nd I I;
C uina
T urcului I ; I ;
C limente
B ile H erculane I
38
1 20
d ecrease
i n
swine,
1 7.7%
t o
2 .3%,
a nd
i ncrease
i n
B os
s p.
2 .2%
t o
1 4.2%, a re d ramatic. A s an atural r esult o f d isagreement o n whether C uina T urcului I i s P leistocene o r p ost-Pleistocene ( Pre-Boreal) , C uina T urcului I I i s s een a s e arlier ( Pre-Boreal) b y S rejovi a nd L etica , a nd l ater ( Boreal) b y PNunescu a nd V iers ( Pop e t a l, 1 970, p . 3 2). B ased o n t he i nformation available, C d ates, p ollen a nalysis, a nd f aunal e vidence , B oronea r4 ( 1980, p .292) h as m ore r ecently c ome t o a gree t hat C uina T urcului I i s t erminal P leistocene a nd C uina T urcului I I i s p ostP leistocene. I t i s most important t o r ealize t hat t he r elative p osition o f C uina T urcului i n t he I ron C ates s equence i s u ndisputed, a nd t hat w ithin t his v ery m uch d ampened a nyway . B oroneant
( 1973,
s heltered e nvironment,
p .26)
f eels
t hat
c limatic
p roto-Lepenski V ir
s hifts w ere
s hould
b e
a t
a bout t he s ame t ime a s t he e nd o f h is S tage 3 i n t he e volution o f t he " Schela" C ulture. This s tage i ncludes I coana I I, S chela C ladovei I I, R azvrata I I, a nd O strovul B anului I IIb . O ne o f t he c haracteristics f or t his s tage i s r ectangular h earths with s tone b orders, which c haracteristic h e p oints t o i n a ssigning p roto-Lepenski V ir t o t his s tage ( Boroneant 1 973, p .26) . R azvrata I I, h owever , h as a n o val h earth ( ibid, p . 1 7) . B oronean Vs
s tages
( see
T able
9 )
a re
a s
f ollows:
t he
f irst
s tage
i ncludes o nly Veterani T erasa; t he s econd s tage i ncludes I coana I , Razvrata I , S chela C ladovei I , a nd O strovul B anului l ila; t he t hird s tage , a s g iven a bove , i ncludes I coana I I, S chela C ladovei I I, R azvrata I, a nd O strovul B anului Il lb ; t he f ourth s tage i ncludes A libeg ( ibid, I p .19) . C omparison with F igure 7 s hows n o p rofound d isagreements i n t he t wo s chemes . Jovanovig ( 1969) d isagrees c ritically o n t he i nterpretation o f P adina , which h e e xcavated . S rejovi a nd L etica e quate P adina A w ith e arly S tage 3 , V lasac I b, O strovul B anului I IIa, a nd Padina B with V lasac I I a nd L epenski V ir I . J ovanovi6 ( ibid , p . 3 6) d ivides t he I ron G ates e pipaleolithic s ites much l ess f inely i nto o nly t wo p hases: p hase I -C uina T urcului I -II, C limente I I, V eterani, O strovul B anului I ;
and
p hase
I I
-I coana
I -II,
R azvrata,
O strovul
B anului
I I-III,
S chela C ladovei I -II, a nd P adina A . J ovanovi6 's p hase I c onsists mostly o f s ites c alled C lisura R omanellian b y B oroneanp a nd s een b y b oth h im a nd S rejovi 6a nd L etica a s n ot p art o f t he S chela C ladovei c ulture p roper, b ut d efinitely a ntecedent a nd d eveloping i nto i t. J ovanovig 's s econd p hase c onsists o f m ost s ites o f what h as b een c alled t he S chela-Lepenski C ulture p roper . B oroneanI s ubdivides t hese s ites m ore f inely i nto h is s econd a nd t hird s tages, a nd S rejovi 6a nd L etica i nclude t hem a ll i n o ne s tage b ut a ttempt t o a ssign a p recise r elative c hronological p osition t o e ach s ite. C uina Turcului I i s g enerally a greed t o b elong i n t he P leistocene, a p oint made c lear b y e vidence a cquired l onA a fter J ovanovi Ps c hronology was p ublished. G iven t he p aucity
o f
c r4
d ates,
t he
m ore
g eneralized
o rderings
o f J ovanoviC
a nd
B oroneant a re p referable. Jovanovi6's
c hronology
i s
s omewhat
o ut
o f
d ate,
b ut
h is
i nterpretation o f P adina B a s e arly N eolithic i s o ne t o which h e s till a dheres ( p.c., 1 976). S rejovi6 , L etica, a nd B oronearq a ll i nterpret P adina B a s a S chela C ladovei-Lepenski V ir C ulture o ccupation .
3 9
The
.
e arly N eolithic p ottery p resent i n t his l evel i s i nterpreted b y t hem a s escribes P adina A a s c ontamination f rom h igher l evels. J ovanoviC- d h aving r ectangular f ireplaces b ordered b y s tones a nd d ug-in t rapezoidal h ouses. He g oes o n t o s ay t hat t he b one a nd a ntler t ools a nd a rchitecture o f h earths a nd h ouses a re c ontinued i n P adina B . T he b asis f or i nterpreting P adina B a s Neolithic s eems t o b e o nly t he p resence o f c eramics . J ovanovi6 f urther a rgues t hat L epenski V ir I a nd I a re c eramic Neolithic l evels, o n t he b asis o f s imilarities i n I h earth, h ouses, e tc., b etween Padina B a nd Lepenski V ir I a nd I I. A nalysis o f t he a nimal b one f rom L epenski V ir ( see P REHISTORIC F AUNAL R EMAINS, b elow) p uts t his i dea t o r est. Analysis o f t he a nimal b one f rom P adina , t he J ovanovi
while s omewhat l ess c onclusive , p osition ( see b elow).
d oes n ot s trongly s upport
li vanovi6 ( 1979, p .805) h as m ore r ecently p ublished a s eries o f 2 d ates f or P adina , r un o n b one ( mostly h uman) a nd u nfortunately n ot i dentified a s b elonging t o e ither Phase A o r B . T he method o f s ample p reparation i s n ot d escribed. The r esults a re p resented i n T able 1 0.
c1 4
S rejovic a nd L etica ( 1978, p .130) a rgue t hat t hese d ates a re u nreliable b ecause o f t he d ifficulties o f d ating b one b y t he C14 m ethod . Without k nowing which d ates a re a ssociated w ith l evel A , a nd which w ith l evel B , i t i s impossible t o a ssess t hem . G iven t he r elatively l ong s eries o f i nternally c onsistent d ates s hown i n T able 8 , a nd t he r ecognized d ifficulties o f d ating c ollagen , i t d oes s eem t hat a ll b ut t he f irst a nd l ast d ates i n t his l ist may b e t oo o ld, r egardless o f t he l evel w ith which t hey a re a ssociated . Additional d ates f or V lasac h ave b een o btained b y s tudying t he n itrogen/flourine c ontents o f h uman b ones ( Buszko e t a l , 1 978, p . 7 6) . Unfortunately, o nly t hree o f t he d ated s amples c ame f rom g raves u nambiguously a ssociated w ith a s tratigraphic l evel . T hese d ates a re p resented i n Table 1 1. C omparison o f t hese d ates with c alibrated c arbon 1 4 d ates ( see b elow) s uggests t hat o nly t he d ate o n g rave 3 1 i s " good" , t he o ther d ates a re t oo r ecent. T wenty-five a dditional d ated b one s amples a re l isted, most o f which h ave t wo d ates g iven . These b ones a re d escribed a s b eing o f u nknown a ge, a nd y et most o f t hem a re f rom g raves which h ave b een a ssigned t o a " probable" s tratigraphic l evel
b y
6 700,
6 800,
t he
e xcavators.
g rave
( grave 2 3)
T hree p robable V lasac I g raves
a nd 7 000 B .C "
a ll r easonable .
g ave
d ates
o f
One p robable V lasac I II
g ave a r easonable d ate o f 5 900 B .C.
- T he a uthors s uggest t hat t he ambiguity o f t his t echnique s tems f rom t he f act t hat t he n itrogen c ontent o f b one i ncreases with i ncreasing a tmospheric t emperatures. c ooling b etween 7 000-6000 B .C . ,
Evidence e xists f or c limatic
f ollowed b y q uick w arming u p f rom 5 900-
5 000 B .C. T hese
d ates
a re n ot
c onsistent
o r
r eliable
e nough
t o
a dd a nything
t o t he u nderstanding o f t he c hronology o f V lasac , o ther t han c onfirming t he s tratigraphic a ssignment o f a f ew g raves. T he d ating o f V lasac b one i s more v aluable a s a n a ttempt t o d evelop a d ating t echnique t han a s a s ource o f a dded i nsight a bout V lasac. T he g eneral c hronological o utlines o f t he I ron G ates S chela C ladovei-Lepenski Vir c ulture a re c lear. T here i s s till a l ot o f
4 0
T ABLE
1 0
C ARBON-14 D ATES O N B ONE F ROM P ADINA* S ample
S ite
N umber
N umber
( Grave?) I dentification
D ate
( Uncorrected)
B M-1143
2
m ature m ale
7 738
±5 1 B P
( 5788 B .C.)
B M-1144
7
s enile f emale
8 797
±8 3 B P
( 6847 B .C.) ( 7381 B .C.)
B M-1146
1 2
m ature m ale
9 331
±5 8 B P
B M-1147
1 4
a dult m ale
9 198
± 1 02 B P
( 7248 B .C.)
B M-1404
3 9
i nfant 1
9 292
±1 48 B P
( 7342 B .C.)
B M-1403
U rsus
* f rom n vanovi ,
8 138 ± 1 21
1 979.
4 1
B P
( 6188 B .C.)
T ABLE N ITROGEN—FLUORINE
1 1
' DATES' F ROM V LASAC, U NCORRECTED*
S tratigraphic A ssociation
G rave N umber
V lasac I I
2 7
5 650 ± 5 0 B .C.
V lasac I
3 2
6 250 ± 2 5 B .C.
V lasac I
3 1
6 850 ± 1 50 B .C.
*f rom B uszko e t a l,
1 978.
. .,
4 2
D ate
u ncertainty many o f
a bout
t he
t he s ites.
p recise
r elative
F or t his
c hronological
r eason,
o nly
r elationships
g eneralized
g roupings
o f o f
s ites a re a dvisable . T he n umber o f d ates a vailable i s s till s mall b ut i s a dequate t o g ive c onfidence i n t he g eneral l ocation o f t hese s ites i n
t he
b road
p icture
T able 8 would put B .C. a nd 1 978).
i ts
Table
o f
a n
a bsolute
c hronology .
t he b eginning o f
t he
d ates
f rom
o ccupation o f V lasac a t
C alibrated
7 000
a bandonment a round 6 000-5800 B .C.
1 2
presents
a c hronology
a nd
( Srejovic T a nd Letica,
d ating
i nformation a vailable f rom v arious s ources, a nd o f Table 8 , a nd t his a uthor's r eservations a ttempting precise r elative c hro2ologies o f hearths which a ppear
t his
t o b e c hronologically
a nd O strovul C orbului
t o
r eflect
p oint.
Ordering
o f
d ates, d ata o n a rchitectural s tyles
s ites i n Table 1 2 i s b ased o n Cl V lasac
a t
r evised
s ince t he p ublication a bout t he v alue o f
t here
a re
l evels
s ignificant
w ith
( at
b oth
r ectangular h earths
s tratigraphically a bove h earths which are oval or e lliptical; Boroneanl, p .c.); p resence o r a bsence o f c eramics, a nd s tratigraphic s uper—positioning. C hronologies b ased o n L ithic A ssemblages T he c lassic m ethod o f d eveloping p re—ceramic c hronologies f rom t he d ays p rior t o t he d evelopment o f c arbon d ating i s o f c ourse b ased o n c hipped s tone t ool o n t he b asis
o f
t ypologies
a nd
t he
c omparing t heir s tone
n ot u sefully o r meaningfully b e f ailure
t o
a rtifacts, m any
s ieve
d uring
c omparison a nd
o rdering
t ool c ontents.
T his
a pplied h ere.
e xcavations
a nd V lasac i s a s ite which o ne m ight
s mall
t ools.
E xamination
o f
t he
make
m issed , any
a nd
l eft with t he
assumptions
r epresentative
o f
w hat
d ebitage .
about
was
the
I t
main
r ecovered
e xpect
b y
o f
m ost
s hown t hat 2 1% t o
t herefore
s tudy
a nd t he
i mpossible
collection
e xcavation ,
s mall
t o h ave p roduced
were s orted o ut,
i s
s ites
d iscussed a bove,
r ecovery
" debitage" h as
6 5% o f t he r etouched/heavily u se—damaged t ools r est
A s
e liminates
o f
m ethod c ould
m uch
l ess
t o
b eing o f
what
t he s ite a ctually c ontained. Other
s ites
i n
t he
t ypologies
d eveloped o n
analyzed
b y
t he
t ype
R adovanovi , 1 981). a ccepts t he n otion o f
I ron
t he
Gates
b asis
o f
frequency
Gorge
h ave
materials method
b een
d uring t he e arly p ost—pleistocene o f
i nvolved
a n
1 970,
a nd
1 978;
The a ppropriation o f t his method implicitly a u nified T ardenoisian " culture" s tretching o ver
f urther h ave
u sing
i n F rance
( P gunescu,
ontinent a -whole c d iscussion
s tudied
e xcavated
t his
i nitial
i ssue) .
A ll
s eparation
a nalyses
a nd
d one
d iscarding
( see o n
( at
b elow
c hipped
l east
f or
s tone
f rom
t he
a nalysis) o f " debitage" f rom u sed p ieces. I t i s c lear f rom t his a nd o ther m icroscopic i nvestigations t hat s uch a s eparation, without t he a id o f m agnification , I t
i s
t hus
o nly
i s u nreliable. p ossible
t o
m ake
s ome
v ery
g eneral
r emarks
a bout
t he c hipped s tone a ssemblage o f Vlasac i n c omparison t o o ther I ron G ates s ites. I n t he f irst p lace, t here a re g eneral s imilarities i n t he u tilization o f r aw materials.
B oroneant ( 1981a, p .15) p rovides s ome
i nformation o n r aw material u se, s ummarized i n T able 1 3.
A t Vlasac,
t he p ercent u tilization o f f lint, a veraged f or t he t hree o ccupations, was 4 1% , a nd f or q uartz 5 5% . T here was n o q uartzite ( see T able 1 4).
4 3
T ABLE
1 2
R EVISED A ND U PDATED C HRONOLOGY F OR T HE
S tages
I RON G ATES R EGION
S ites
Uncorrected D ates
L jubcova;
5 495 ± 8 0 B .C.
Early
V lasac I V;
N eolithic
G ornea; S tubica; L epenski V ir I II; C uina T urcului I II
T ransitional
A libeg;
M eso-Neo
M are I II
O strovul
5 245 ± 1 00 B .C.
M esolithic
V lasac I I a nd I II;
Later
L epenski V ir I a nd I I;
5 980-5200 B .C.
P adina A a nd B ; O strovul C orbului I II; R azvrata I I;
S chela
C ladovei I I;
O strovul
B anului I IIb; M are I ; M esolithic E arlier
O strovul
I coana I I 6 315-6000 B .C.
V lasac I ; O strovul B anului I IIa; I coana I a a nd b ; V eterani T erasa; R azvrata I a a nd b ; S chela C ladovei I
I nitial P ost-
C uina T urcului I I
.
8 175 + 2 00 B .C.
B ile Herculane I I
P leistocene T erminal
C uina T urcului I
P leistocene
4 4
1 0,650 + 1 20 B .C.
T ABLE
1 3
U TILIZATION O F R AW MATERIALS A T V ARIOUS R OMANIAN S ITES*
S ite e arly
% f lint
% q uartz
37.76
1 3.16
4 9.00
1 3.69
4 3.55
42.74
1 .48
6 6.00
32.51
0.57
7 4.42
25.00
S chela C ladovei
4 .18
7 0.10
25.71
A libeg
5 .15
8 4.10
10.74
V eterani T erasa O strovul B anului I coana R azvrata
l ate
*a fter B oroneant, ,
1 981a.
T ABLE
1 4
U TILIZATION O F R AW MATERIALS A T V LASAC
O ccupation
% f lint
% q uartz
V lasac I
49.6
45.7
V lasac I I
4 1.1
56.0
V lasac I II
3 4.7
64.1
4 5
% q uartzite
T he c hipped s tone f rom P adina c ontains v irtually n o q uartz , b ut a h igh p ercentage o f s iltstone, s ilica r ock, v olcanics a nd o ther n onf lint r ocks ( see h owever , R adovanoviC , 1 981, p .100) . A t L epenski V ir , a g reat d eal o f q uartz was e xcavated, b ut was n ot s aved, s o t hat t he museum c ollection f or Lepenski Vir ( only 1 236 p ieces) i s a lmost a ll f lint ( Srejovig, p .c.) . Mogoyanu ( 1972, p .19), i n a r eview a rticle o n t he Paleolithic o f t he .Banat--the s outhwestern p rovince o f R omania which i ncludes t he I ron G ates R egion--defines a q uartzitic P aleolithic f or t hat r egion , p oorly d efined a nd s tudied , b ut whose e xistence s uggests a n a ntecedent f or t he heavy u tilization o f q uartz i n t he e arly p ost-Pleistocene p eriod. S ince m ost o f t he q uartz i s white , a nd t hus m ore e asily s een , a nd s ince n o s creening was d one o n a ny o f t hese e xcavations, i t s eems c ertain t hat f lint i s under-represented. This would n ot a ffect t he r elative i ncrease i n t he i mportance o f q uartz/quartzite t hrough t ime , w hich m ay well b e a ssociated with an i ncrease i n a ctivities r equiring q uartz t ools. The t ool t ypes d escribed a nd i llustrated f or v arious I ron Gates s ites a re l ike t hose d escribed h ere f or V lasac. A t C uina T urcului I t here a re m icrolithic r ound s crapers, a nd l arger o nes i n C uina T urcului I I ( Päunescu, 1 970, f ig. 6 ). D enticulates, b urins ( gravers), b acked b lades, t rapezes, a nd p ieces e squillees a re r eported f rom b oth l evels, a long with o ther t ools ( ibid, p .12, p .13; P äunescu, 1 980, f ig. 8 ). Microlithic s crapers, r etouched b ladelets, p ieces e squillees, a nd b urins ( gravers) a re r eported f rom t he more r ecent s ites o f V eterani T erasa, Razvrata, S chela C ladovei, a nd O strovul B anului ( Boroneank, 1 973, p .11, p .12) . Microcores a re r eported f rom I coana a nd S chela C ladovei ( ibid, p .12), which i s unlike V lasac, b ut o therwise a ny a nd a ll r eports c ould f it i n with t he V lasac m aterial . I nsofar a s p ublished a ccounts a nd v arying o r u nstated e xcavation t echniques a nd a nalytic a pproaches a llow c omparison , which i s n ot v ery f ar , t he c hipped s tone o f t he I ron G ates s ites l ooks s imilar e nough t o m aintain t he h ypothesis o f t emporal a nd s patial c ultural c ontinuity. D ifferences b etween s ites, a s o r e xample t he a bsence o f u tilization o f q uartzite a t V lasac , o r q uartz a t P adina , m ay r eflect d istinctions a t a l ower l evel, p erhaps o n t he o rder o f t he p hratry i n c ontemporary s ocieties . S ampling a nd r eliability p roblems w ith t he d ata , a s well a s f ailure t o p ublish t hese s ites a dequately , r ules o ut t he p ossibility o f u sing c hipped s tone a s a n a id i n o rdering t hese s ites c hronologically ( although s ee R adovanovi C ,
1 981,
p p.114-115).
C hronological R elations T o A reas O utside T he I ron G ates R egion T he a re,
b asis
a nd
o rigins
o f
a ccording t o B oroneant,
t he
S chela C ladovei-Lepenski V ir
c learly u nderstood .
c ulture
W ithin t he I ron G ates
t here i s a s equence s tarting w ith t he E pigravettian f ound a t C limente I which i s a ncestral t o t he " clisura" R omanellian a t C uina T urcului I I, C limente I I, V eterani , a nd O strovul B anului I I . T he S chela C ladovei L epenski V ir c ulture c an b e s een i n m any r espects a s a c ontinuation o f, o r d evelopment f rom , t his " clisura" R omanellian ( Boronearq , 1 979b , p . 2 8). S tarting i n t he p rotoromanellian a r eduction i n m obility
4 6
i ncreasing t hrough t he " clisura" R omanellian a nd i nto t he S chela C ladovei c ulture l ed t o l ess a nd l ess u se o f r esources o utside t he. gorge, and t hus more and more u se o f quartz and quartzite. M anufacturing t echniques c hanged t o s uit n ew materials a nd B oroneanF c laims q uartz was worked b y s triking c obbles t ogether a nd s electing a ppropriate p ieces o f s hatter f or r etouch ( ibid , p . 3 0) . T he wealth o f b one t ools i n t he S chela c ulture i s a lso a c arryover f rom t he " clisura" R omanellian ( ibid, p . 3 2) . T he main s timulus f or t his g radual t ransformation, which l ed t o t he b eginning o f f ood p roduction i n t he a rea , i s f elt b y B oronearq ( 1979b) t o h ave b een t he g radual w arming u p a fter t he W ürm , w hich h e b elieves l ed t o s edentism i n t he a rea.
a lso
T he d evelopment o f a f ood p roducing e conomy i n t he I ron G ates i s s een a s a d evelopment a t l east i n part o ut o f t he l ocal
E pipaleolithic b ase . C ontinuity i s c laimed i n s tone , b one , a nd a ntler t ools a nd t he i ncised d ecorative motifs f ound o n b one, a ntler, a nd s tone i n t he P aleolithic a re c laimed t o b e f ound o n c eramics, e xpressed t hrough i ncision a nd p ainting ( ibid, p .39), i n t he Neolithic. F aunal r emains a nd p ollen e vidence ( see b elow) h ave a lso b een u sed t o s upport t he i dea o f a d eveloping i ndigenous p attern o f c ontrolling c ertain r esources, i .e., a t rend t owards f ood p roduction, o n s ome R omanian s ites. F rom B oronean ys p erspective, f ood p roduction i s s omething which would h ave h appened a nyway . T his d oes n ot m ean t hat t he s udden a ppearance o f d omesticated p lants a nd a nimals, a long w ith c eramics, d id n ot i nvolve p opulation movement, o r p ossibly r eplacement, a lthough t here i s On
e vidence t he
t o
b asis
c hronologically
o f
b ased
s uggest
t hat s uch d id n ot o ccur .
e xisting C14 c omparison
d ates
w ith
f or
o ther
t he
I ron
G ates
p ost-Pleistocene
s ites,
f oraging
c ultures c an b e m ade. The v ery l ong a nd well-dated E pipaleolithic s equence f rom F ranchthi c ave ( Jacobsen 1 973, 1 974, P ayne , 1 975b) c oincides c ompletely with t he I ron Gates.
F ranchthi C ave f aces t he b ay o f Koilada o n t he
western c oast o f t he Argolid i n G reece. T he e arliest Mesolithic a t F ranchthi i s d ated t o a bout 8 500 b .c. ( uncorrected) a nd l inked t o a s hift i n p atterns o f a nimal e xploitation which r eflect p ost-Pleistocene s hifts i n c limate i nvolving r ising t emperatures, ' increasing r ainfall , t he r esultant r eplacement b y f orest a nimals ( Payne,
o f o pen b y wooded c onditions, a nd t hus o pen 1 975b , p .122) . T his f irst M esolithic p eriod
a t
t emporally
Franchthi
would
b e
e quivalent
t o
t he
" clisura"
R omanellian i n t he I ron G ates. T he l ater M esolithic a t F ranchthi, w ith d ates r anging f rom 6 250-7350 B .C . w ould b e c hronogically e quivalent t o t he S chela C ladovei-Lepenski V ir c ulture, e nding a l ittle e arlier b ecause o f t he e arlier e stablishment o f f ood p roduction i n G reece t han i n t he Danube a rea. A t F ranchthi t he a ppearance o f f ood p roduction i nvolves a d ramatic c hange i n s ubsistence f rom a h eavy d ependence o n r ed d eer ( over 8 0% o f a ll n on-fish b one) a nd s econdarily o n p ig , a nd o n l arge ( marine) f ish , p istachios a nd a lmonds, t o s heep-goat ( 90% o f a ll n on-fish b one), n o f ish, s carce p ig b ones a nd n o n ut p p .128-129) . Mesolithic d omestication o f l entils, o ats F ranchthi
a re,
h owever,
n ow
c onsidered
( Jacobsen, 1 981, p .308).
4 7
l ikely
t o
s hells ( ibid, a nd b arley a t h ave
o ccurred
There
a re
a lso
c lear
s hifts
i n
s ubsistence
p atterns
e arlier t o t he l ater Mesolithic l evels a t F ranchthi.
f rom
t he
I n t he e arlier
l evel, f ish b ones a re s carce, i n t he l ater l evel t hey c ome t o r epresent 2 0-40% o f t he t otal b ulk o f b one . T he e xploitation o f r ed d eer , which a t
t he b eginning o f
t he M esolithic r epresents 7 0% o f a ll n on-fish b one,
i ncreases t hroughout t he Mesolithic, a nd e xploitation o f p ig, 3 0% a t t he b eginning , d ecreases. C hanges i n e xploitation o f r ed d eer a nd p ig a re g radual ,
b ut
l arge f ish e xploitation a ppears a bruptly ,
a nd h as b een
l inked t o t he e stablishment
o f o bsidian t rade w ith t he i sland o f Melos,
1 30 k ilometers
F ranchthi
V an Horn,
s outheast
o f
( ibid,
p .122,
p .128 ;
J acobsen
a nd
1 974).
Published C14
d ates
f or F ranchthi i nclude t wo s eries,
l isted i n
T able 1 5. The
c hipped
P aleolithic t ypes
o f
r aw
d ecreased
s tone
a nd
f rom
m aterial
were
u sed ,
o f
b lades
p ercentage
manufacturing
t echnology,
c ortex
p latforms,
c overed
percentage
F ranchthi
Mesolithic p eriods
d ebitage
f or
d oes
kna pp e d
o f
s hows
a nd
n ot
b reak
1 973,
l ooks
t he
b ladelets,
example
t he
c hange .
p ieces
n o
( Perl s,
which
A c lear
T he
t he s ame
s ame
e xcept
a nd
evidence
d ominance
were
b etween
p .76).
o f
f or a o f
u nfaceted,
d ifference
r etouched,
i s
t he
1 9-24%
i n
P aleolithic l evels, 2 -4.7% i n Mesolithic l evels.
Among P aleolithic
r etouched
d ominate
t ools,
b acked
b ladelets,
p ointed
o r
n ot,
( and
5 7.7%
have d irect r etouch) f ollowed b y e nd-scrapers, u sually o n f lakes, t he
l owest
l evel.
The
l ast
u pper Paleolithic
c ontains
i n
a s maller
p ercentage o f r etouched p ieces . Many o f t hese a re m icroliths . T hirtyf ive p ercent o f t he r etouched p ieces a re b acked b ladelets, g eometrics ( triangles a nd r ectangles) c onstitute 1 2% , a nd n on-geometric m icroliths account
f or
n otches,
a nd
t ypes
1 0%.
d ominate
t rench
o f
d ifferent,
O ther a rtifacts
m arginally t he
t he a nd
r etouched
s ite. t his
r etouched
t ools
Material
e nigma
i s
i nclude g rattoirs,
f lakes. f rom
i mportant,
m ore
t he
s ame
l ower
a nother
d enticulates, t hree
r etouched
Mesolithic
t rench
i s
o f
o ne
r adically
p resently u nsolved .
I n t he l ater Mesolithic l evel, b ecomes
o f
T hese
s elective
t he u se
u se
o f
o f
o bsidian f rom Melos
h igher
q uality
l ocal
f lints
o ccurs, a nd t hese p ractices a re c arried t hrough t he e arly N eolithic . The p ercentage o f r etouched p ieces b ecomes much h igher i n t he N eolithic, 1 0-30%. Long f lakes a re r emoved b y p ressure r etouch . Marginally r etouched b lades, e nd s crapers, n otched p ieces, a nd a wls a re c ommon ( Per Us, 1 973, p p .80-82) . T here a re t rapezes i n b oth l ate Meso a nd e arly N eolithic, b ut t he l ate M esolithic d ebitage i s d ominated b y f lakes,
a nd
o f
r etouched
t he
Only
t he
5 % a re
e arly N eolithic
t rue
p ieces
a re
g eometrics
b y
b lades .
I n
t he
e ither microliths ( all
t rapezes).
l ate
Mesolithic
4 0%
o r b acked b ladelets. F lakes
with
marginal
r etouch a nd d enticulates e ach a ccount f or m ore t han 1 1% , f lakes a c oche % , and g rattoirs 5 % . The f lint f rom t he e arly r etouchge a ccount f or 9 Neolithic l evels i s " poor" , a nd n o f igures a re g iven ( Perlgs, 1 976, p . 8 ) .
O n t he b asis
a ny
o pinion a bout
o r Neolithic a bout
1 000 There
o f
t he
i nformation p rovided
c ontinuity
l evels
o r
l ack
a t F ranchthi.
o f
i t
i s
i mpossible
c optinuity f rom
The CI4
d ates
t o
f orm
t he M esolithic
s uggest a b reak o f
y ears. i s
n o
s pecific
l ink
t o
4 8
t he
I ron Gates
i n
t he
s eries
o f
T ABLE 1 5 C ARBON-14 D ATES F OR F RANCHTHI C AVE
J acobsen,
1 973
P -1536
6 250 ± 7 5
P -1398
7 190 + 1 25
J acobsen,
u pper M esolithic
1 974
P -2096
6 758 + 1 00
P -2106
6 785 + 9 3
P -1517
7 100 ± 1 00
P -1518
7 000 ± 1 00
P -2107
6 580 ± 8 7
P -1518A
5 775 ± 1 00
P -2097
7 202 + 9 7
P -1664
7 000 + 10
P -2108
7 297
P -1666
6 775 + 1 50
P -2102
7 341 ± 9 8
P -2103
7 351 ± 9 9
P -2104
7 319 ± 1 11
P -1665
7 025 ± 1 50
P -1519
7 300 + 1 50
P -1522
7 350 ± 1 50
1 -6139
8 510 ± 2 10
l ower M esolithic
4 9
4. 15
c hanges i n p atterns o f r esource e xploitation s een a t F ranchthi. T he o utlines o f t he p attern , h owever , a re s imilar . B oth a t F ranchthi , a nd a t C uina T urcului I , c old w eather s pecies w ere e xploited a t t he e nd o f t he P leistocene, a nd a s hift a t b oth s ites, which c an b e l inked t o c hanges i n r esource a vailability, b egins w ith t he p ost-Pleistocene. C hanges i n r esource u tilization , n ot d ue e xclusively t o f urther c limate s hifts ( e .g . , t he e xploitation o f l arge f ish l inked t o d eep s ea t ravel f or o bsidian t rade a t F ranchthi) , c ontinue a t F ranchthi a nd i n t he I ron G ates, u p t o t he a ppearance o f f ood p roduction t echniques. I n t he I ron G ates a nd a t F ranchthi s ome o f t hese c hanges m ay well h ave b een l eading i n t he d irection o f f ood p roduction a nyway . Odmut c onfluence Mesolithic e xcavators T he s eries
c ave ( actually a small r ock s helter) o n t he b anks o f t he o f t wo r ivers i n t he Karst Mountains o f Montenegro, h as d eposits a veraging 1 .5 meters t hick, d ivided b y t he i nto t wo l evels ( 1.1 and . 4 meters t hick, r espectively). ates f it t he c hronology o f t he I ron G ates i f o ne o f C14 d
s elects t he " right" d ates, c onsistent ( see T able 1 6).
b ut
t he
d ates
a re
n ot
v ery
i nternally
F aunal a nalysis f or Odmut h as n ot b een f ormally p ublished, b ut b oth l evels a re r eported t o c ontain h igh p ercentages ( 65%) o f i bex a nd s econdarily r ed d eer ( 25%). Wild p ig, b ear, r oe d eer, wild g oat, a nd wild c at were a lso p resent i n b oth l evels . B eaver , wolf , f ox , a nd l ynx o ccurred o nly i n t he l ower l evel , a nd a urochs o nly i n t he u pper l evel . F ish o ccurred i n b oth l evels i n unspecified p roportions, b ut t he d iscovery o f 5 6 antler h arpoons ( from b oth f ishing w as q uite i mportant ( Srejovi6, 1 975).
l evels)
s uggests
t hat
Odmut I I a a nd b a re c haracterized a s e arly N eolithic with c eramics b earing s ome s imilarity t o t he e arly Impresso ware o f t he Mediterranean , b ut m ore t o t he i nland e arly N eolithic S ta/levo ware , f ound t hroughout S erbia a nd a lso i n t he I ron Gates r egion . What i s d escribed a s a " larger q uantity o f a nimal b ones" ( presumably t han O dmut I ) i ncluded l arge n umbers o f i bex a nd r ed d eer, a s well a s wild p ig, weasel, a nd b ear . Domestj _cated s heep-goat a nd c ow were a lso f ound ( Markovi L 1 975, p .8). C1 ' d ates f or Odmut I I a re g iven i n T able 1 7. T hese d ates f it w ell w ith t he d ates f or t he p receding Mesolithic l ayer . T he l ack o f d etailed f aunal a nalysis, f ine t emporal c ontrol , p ollen o r o ther
v egetation d ata p revent
t he
c onstruction o f
a m eaningful p icture
o f s ubsistence a t O dmut, o r s ubsistence c hanges t hrough t ime. T he s hort a nd i nconsistent l ist o f d ates f or t he M esolithic l evel m ake i t u nclear f or h ow was
l ong ,
o r e ven d uring what c limatic e pisodes,
t he
s ite
o ccupied . Further away,
i n s outhern I taly,
t wo C14
d ates f or G rotta d ella
M adonna 5 605 B .C. ( corrected) a nd C oppa N evigata 6 200 B .C . ( corrected) were r eported f or l evels which c ontained M editerranean I mpresso e arly N eolithic p ottery a long w ith s hellfish mounds a nd o ther e vidence o f a g athering a nd h unting e conomy . W hitehouse ( 1978 , p .78) c alls t his t he c eramic Mesolithic a nd a rgues f or a n i nterpretation o f t hese a nd o ther western M editerranean s ixth m illenium s ites a s r epresenting a c omplex o f Mesolithic c ultures , with o ccasional e vidence f or s heep b reeding, which m ade a nd u sed , o r t raded f or , t he Impresso w are c ommon t hroughout t he
European
a nd
E ast
Mediterranean
5 0
s hores,
and
t raditionally
T ABLE
1 6
R ADIOCARBON D ATES F ROM O DMUT C AVE,
O DMUT I *
L ab N o.
S ite L evel
D ate
S i-2220
O dmut l b
5 200 ± 1 00 B .C.
S i-2221
O dmut I b
5 770 ± 8 5 B .C.
S i-2224
O dmut l b/Ia
640 ± 1 00 B .C. 6
S i-2225
O dmut I a
8 095 ± 8 5 B .C.
S i-2226
O dmut I a
5 840 ± 7 0 B .C.
S i-2227
O dmut I a
5 130 ± 8 5 B .C.
S i-2228
O dmut I a
7 185 ±
* f rom S rejovic,
1 975,
p .5.
5 1
( Uncorrected)
3 0 B .C.
T ABLE
1 7
R ADIOCARBON D ATES F ROM O DMUT C AVE,
O DMUT I I
L ab N o.
D ates
S i-2217
5 035 ± 1 00 B .C.
S i-2219
5 005 ± 1 00 B .C.
S i-2222
4 950 ± 1 10 B .C.
* f rom S rejovic,
1 975
5 2
( Uncorrected)*
a ssociated h as
with
p resented
s ettled
v illage
e xtensive
f arming .
e vidence
f or
E lsewhere
t he
s ide
b y
Whitehouse
( 1971)
xistence c o-e
s ide
o f•
e arly f armers a nd g atherers h eavily d ependent o n s hellfish c ollecting , a nd a g radual a bsorption, c omplete with t emporary r eversals, o f t he g atherer-hunters
into
s tratigraphically P razziche ,
t he
d istinct
G rotta d e F ico ,
B ietti
( 1981,
p .47)
f ood-producing
p hases
a t
t he
C oppa N evigata,
l ists
a d ozen
e conomy,
s ites
o f
i n
Grotta
f our d elle
a nd G rotta d elle Mura .
s ites
i n
I taly
where
h e
a sserts
t he i ndustry ( stone) o f t he Neolithic a nd underlying Mesolithic " is v ery s imilar" a nd where t here i s a lso " abundant" e vidence o f a c ontinuation
o f
d omesticated
h unting,
a nimals.
p ottery, b ut i ndicates, i n
a long with
n o e vidence o f m y o pinion , t he
t he Mesolithic h uman g roups p .47). C rvena
S tijena ,
t he
a ppearance
A t R omagnano I IIAA ,
a nd t he
a d eeply
a nd N eolithic
p ottery
a nd
t here
i s
f ood p roduction . " This c ircumstance s ubstantial c ultural c ontinuity b etween e arly N eolithic o nes,..." ( ibid,
s tratified
( over
2 0
meters
r ock s helter o verlooking a r iver v alley i n Montenegro , Mesolithic ,
o f
i n N orthern I taly,
d eposits.
T here
a re
n o
o f
d eposits)
h as P aleolithic,
d ates
f or
t his
s ite
a nd n o p ollen o r o ther v egetation d ata . F aunal r emains a re d escribed a s v ery r ich, b ut f or l evel V , t he l ast Pleistocene l evel, minimum n umbers
o f
e ach
h are
o f
i ndividual a nimals
r eported i nclude o nly t hree mammals,
( Lepus t imidus) ,
p ig ,
t he g astropods H elix p omatia, ( aegopiis) c roaticus
( Malez,
a nd
Z onites 1 967,
d eer
( sp)
( Rakovec,
( aegopic) v erticilus,
t able
1 ) .
L evel I V,
1 958) ,
o ne p lus
a nd Z onites
s ubdivided
i nto
I Va, I Vb a nd I Vb2 i s t he Mesolithic l ayer. T here i s n o s terile l ayer s eparating l evels I V a nd V . Level I Va h ad t he f ollowing f auna: r ed d eer,
p ig,
B rodar,
aurochs,
1 958,
c hamois,
p .25).
I t
f ox ,
a lso h as
wild c ats,
and
n o e vidence
b adger
( Benac
o f h earths.
I n
a nd
s harp
c ontrast, l evel I Vb1 h ad a " remarkable n umber o f h earths" a nd was a lso " rich i n a nimal b ones" , a bout 5 000 c oming f rom a s ingle t rench ( I )) . I n t heir o rder o f r elative importance , f auna were : r ed d eer , p ig , a urochs, c hamois, r oe d eer, b adger, h are, f ox, wild c at, a nd b ear. This l evel i s
a lso
" rich" n umber
d escribed a s
i n o f
r ed d eer,
b one
t ools
h earths, p ig,
h aving a g reat q uantity a s
a nd
well f ewer
a nd c hamois.
w ere f ar f ewer ,
a s
s tone
b ones,
t ools.
o f
s nail
s hells,
L evel I Vb2 h ad
i ncluding
t he
a nd
was
a s maller
f ollowing
a nimals:
The s nails were a ll b ut g one, b one t ools
b ut t here were
s till a l ot
L evel I II a t C rvena S tijena
i s
o f
s tone
t ools.
d escribed a s N eolithic o n t he b asis
o f t he p resence o f Impress° c eramics. F auna, h owever, i nclude o nly w ild f orms: r ed d eer , p ig , c hamois, l ynx , a urochs, a nd f ox . T here a re a lso n o p olished s tone t ools. L evel I I, which o ccurs a bove l evel I II a nd a lso c ontains e arly N eolithic c eramics a lso c ontains o nly w ild f auna,
and
no
" Neolithic" i t c omparison o f c ultural
polished
i s
s tone.
Although
e lsewhere a rgued t hat
b one t ools
c ontinuity
l evel I V t hrough I I I I
a t
l east
b ack
with h ollowed o ut c oncavities,
l evel I V.
I n l evel I I
d isappeared .
B lades,
l evel o f
i .e .,
t he v ery s mall
u nretouched
a nd
5 3
( Benac,
t hrough
s tone i llustrated a lso s hows c ontinuity. f lakes
t his b asis
( there a re v ery f ew) a nd s tone
f rom
p oints o ccur f rom l evel
o n t he
i s
c alled
f aunal r emains, t ools,
1 957,
l evel V .
t here i s
p .27) . T he
B one
c hipped
Levels I I-V h ad b lades a nd n otches,
t ools
r eported c ommon i n
o f p revious
r etouched
i n v arious
l evels h ave ways,
o ccur
I n a ll l evels--some a re d escribed a s p oints. I rregular f orms a lso o ccur i n a ll l evels, a nd i n t he b rief d iscussion o f c hipped s tone a nalysis, t he d ifficulty o f a pplying " typology" t o t his material i s m entioned s everal t imes . O ne g ets a n o verall i mpression o f a l argely amorphous f lint c ollection ( Benac , 1 957) . I t would b e much e asier t o a ccept t he a rgument f or c ultural ates b acked u p t he a pparent l ack o f a n o ccupational c ontinuity i f C14 d h iatus b etween l evel I V a nd I II a t C rvena S tijena . I t i s i mpossible t o e valuate t he a rguments b ased o n c ontinuity i n c hipped s tone a nd b one t ools, s ince o nly e xamples o f e ach h ave b een p ublished. C ontinuity b etween l evels V a nd I V a lso s eems w orth i nvestigating , b ut t his i ssue h as n ot b een c onsidered b y t he a uthors, a nd t he p ublished d ata d o n ot a llow i t . T he m ost c onvincing e vidence i s t he f aunal r emains, a lthough t hese a re a lso d ifficult s ince p resence/absence i s t he o nly i nformation c onsistently available. The f auna l isted a re a lso a ll l arge, s uggesting s ize s kewing o f t he s ample. A lthough i t i s b y n o means c ertain , C rvena S tijena I I a nd I II l ook l ike a nother c ase o f g athererh unters r etaining t heir s ubsistence s ystem o ver t ime while i n c ontact- p ossibly t rading--with e arly f armers. O ther
e vidence
o f
t he
c o-existence
o f
l ong-resident
f oragers
a nd
i ntrusive ( or l ocally c onverted?) f armers i s a bundant. Northern E urope, s pecifically N orway , D enmark a nd F inland , e vidences u p t o 1 000 y ears o f c ontact b etween f oragers a nd f armers b efore " substitution" o f f ood p roduction f or f oraging b ecomes s ignificant ( Mikkelsen a nd J ohansen, 1 985; Zvelebil a nd R owley -C onwy, 1 984). V irtually u p t o t he p resent d ay t he N ordic a rea s till e xhibits a m ixture o f M esolithic a nd N eolithic e conomies The
s o-called
( Broadbent,
1 985).
" forest-Neolithic" ,
c onsisting
o f
s ites
which
e vidence f ishing, g athering, a nd h unting a s p rimary s ubsistence a ctivity, a long with e vidence o f c utact with f ood-producers, m ost o ften i n t he f orm o f c eramics, a nd C d ates w ithin t he f ood-producing p eriod, a re r eported f rom t he B ug-Dniestr C ultures o f Moldavia, t he D nepr-Donets c ultures o f t he U kraine , t he E ast L atvian s ite o f O sa ( C1 4 6 040-5630 B .P.) a nd t he s ite o f Z acen'e i n C entral B yelorussia ( Dolukhanov, 1 973, p .335). S oroki I o n t he Dniestr d oes have s ubstantial e vidence o f s ome f ood p roduction , e ven t hough r eliance o n f ish ( 1,166 f ish b ones o f l arge f ish-roach , w els, c atfish a nd p ike) a nd wild m ammals ( 66%) was g reater t han o n t he d omesticated c attle a nd p igs a lso i n e vidence i n t he u pper l evel . Emmer , e inkorn , a nd s pelt wheat impressions a lso o ccur o n s herds. I n t he l ower l evel o f S oroki I t he m ammal b ones were 9 0% wild . S oroki I I " Neolithic" a lso h as t wo l evels, b ut h ere b oth l evels a re a ceramic. I n t he l ower l evel 8 3% a nd i n t he u pper l evel 8 1% o f t he b ones a re o f wild a nimals. Almost a ll o f t he d omesticated a nimal b one i s p ig . " Forest N eolithic" s ites a long t he S outhern B ug R iver a lso t ypically h ave 9 0+% wild a nimal b ones, a nd e vidence o f c ollecting s hellfish a nd o f f ishing ( Dolukhanov , 1 977) . According t o T ringham ( 1971, p .47) t here i s a lso a p ristine M esolithic l evel a t S oroki I I where t he o nly d omesticated a nimal i s d og a nd where t here i s p ossible e vidence o f w inter o ccupations, f eaturing s emi-subterranean h ouses w ith h earths i n t hem , a nd s ummer s urface - l evel h earths which a re s urrounded b y m ussel s hells a nd c arp a nd r oach b ones
5 4
( Rutilus f risii)
( but
s ee
Whittle ,
1 985,
p .119) .
I n t he C rimea , d omesticated p igs a re c laimed a t t he s ites o f Z amil K oba a nd Tas A yir a nd t o t he n orth a t t he s ite o f K amennaya Mogila d omesticated c attle h ave b een c laimed . T hese s ites a ppear i n e very o ther r espect t o f it i n with t he Mesolithic o f t he a rea ( ibid, p .50). A t La Adam, j ust s outh o f t he D anube d elta i n Romania, a rcheologists h ave i dentified d omesticated s heep i n a n o therwise M esolithic a ppearing s ite. T he a uthors p oint t o s keletal c hanges i n t he s heep i n a ddition t o HI P m ore c ompelling c hanges i n t he a ge d istributions o f s laughtered s heep a nd t he i ncreasing d ominance o f s heep t hrough t ime ( Radulesco a nd S amson , 1 962) . T he a ccuracy o f t his c laim i s n ot w idely a ccepted . I n F rance , M esolithic s ites p ersist o n p oor s oils amidst N eolithic s ites. L arge a reas o f Western F rance r emained uninfluenced b y N eolithic a daptations f or a t housand y ears a fter t he N eolithic b egan i n o 3 000 B .C., t here F rance. A t t he s ite o f Roucadour, d ated b y C14 t e xisted a n e conomy p rimarily d ependent o n h unting , b ut a lso o n c ereals . A t o ther Mesolithic s ites p opulations r emained t otally d ependent o n w ild p lant r esources,
b ut b egan t o h erd s heep/goats
( Bailloud,
1 974).
I n t he western Languedoc -e astern P yrenees r egion d omesticated s heep/goats a re f ound i n o therwise Mesolithic l evels o f a n umber o f s ites, a nd wild f auna c ontinue t o b e important, i n l ater, o therwise, N eolithic l evels . C hipped s tone t ools f rom t he Mesolithic a nd E arly N eolithic s ites o f t he r egion s how " striking o verall s imilarity" ( Vaughan , 1 982, p .10) . S hell o rnaments f rom Mesolithic a nd E arly N eolithic s ites
a re
a lso v ery
s imilar
( Mills,
1 983,
p .109) .
R ecent s tudies c onsider t he d evelopment o f t he N eolithic t his r egion i n t erms o f a p rocess o f ' neolithisation '
i n i n
which i ndigenous l ocal p opulations g radually t ook u p s tock r aising, c ereal c ultivation , a nd t he u se o f p ottery ( ibid, p .110). T he
s ame
p rocess
o f
c hange
h as
b een d escribed
f or West-Central F rance
( Scarre, 1 983, p .228) . I n t he F rench P yrenees, t oo, c ontinuity o f material c ulture, a long with a s low t ransformation t o d ependence o n d omesticated a nimals a nd t he u se o f c eramics c haracterized t he Mesolithic-Neolithic t ransition ( Bahn , 1 983) . I n B rittany , t he s ites o f T gviec a nd H oedic r epresent . b asically Mesolithic a daptations with t he a ddition
o f
a f ew
d omesticates
( Hibbs,
1 983,
p .279) .
A g reat d eal o f r egional v ariation i s t hus d ocumented f or E urope i n t he n ature o f t he r esponse o f r esident p opulations t o t he f irst f armers . T hese d ata p rovide a c ontext i n which t o a ssess what , i f a ny, n ew u nderstanding o f a daptation a nd c hange i n e arly p ost-glacial E urope c an b e g ained b y t he s tudy o f t he I ron G ates S ites.
5 5
P REHISTORIC F AUNAL R EMAINS T he F aunal r emains f rom V lasac were a nalyzed b y S . B ökönyi ( 1978) . B ökönyi c haracterizes t he m aterial a s a ' kitchen m idden" , m eaning t hat t he b ones were v irtually a ll b roken ( only 2 1 u nbroken l ong b ones--all c arnivores--out o f 3 0,000 i dentifiable b ones) a nd t hat n o whole s keletons were f ound ( 1978, a re g iven i n T able 1 8 . T he
m ost
i nteresting
p .35) .
a spect
The i dentifications
o f
t he
f aunal
a ssemblage
( 1978,
p .36)
f or B ökönyi
i s t he e vidence f or i n s itu d omestication o f t he d og . H e d escribes t he " Vlasac-type" d og a s h aving a s kull which i s morphologically q uite d istinct f rom t he " palustris" d omesticated d og o f t he e arliest N eolithic s ites ( 1975, p p.174-175) a nd a rgues a t s ome l ength f or a c ontinuum o f " transitional f orms" f rom wolf t o d og i n t he V lasac material ( 1978, p p.38-42). T he f act t hat o nly 3 p ercent o f t he d og b one was f rom immature a nimals i s u sed t o a rgue t hat d ogs were n ot p rimarily k ept f or t heir m eat ( 1975, p .50) . A ccording t o B ökönyi , t he f aunal a ssemblage r epresents a n umber o f d istinct h abitats within t he Gorge. ( See T able 1 9). O f a ll t he i dentified mammals, a urochs a lone m ust h ave c ome f rom o utside t he G orge ( 1975, p .37). Another a rrangement o f t he f auna c onsiders whether t he p rimary u se i s f or meat o r f ur . Animals t aken p rimarily o r e xclusively f or meat will b e t aken a s j uveniles, a dults, a nd s enile a nimals, a s i s t rue o f r ed d eer , r oe d eer, a nd p ig a t V lasac. Animals t aken p rimarily f or t heir f ur w ill u sually b e t aken a s s ubadults a nd a dults . I t w ould a lso b e t rue t hat t hey would o nly b e t aken a t c ertain s easons, b ut B ökönyi d id n ot s tudy s easonality. Wild c at, p ine marten, b adger, wolf, r ed f ox , and b eaver However, b adger,
a ll f ollow t his r ed f ox , b eaver,
p attern a t V lasac ( 1975, p .50) . a nd w ild c at were a lso e aten, a s
e videnced b y b utchering marks a nd b one b reakage . B rown b ear a ge d istributions f ollow t he p attern o f a nimals p rimarily k illed f or m eat. ( 1975,
p p.46-48) .
S quirrels
a re
r epresented
b y o nly
t hree i hdividuals a nd B ökönyi
s uggests t hat t hey were p erhaps t oo small t o b other p ursuing ( 1975, p .48). I t i s l ikely t hat t heir small b ones were m issed w ith much g reater f requency t han t hose o f l arger a nimals . T he s ame e xplanation i s offered for the scarce representation of Brown hare ( four i ndividuals) which B ökönyi c laims a re s carce i n s ites u p u ntil t he Middle Ages, b y which t ime a ll b ig g ame h ad b een k illed o ff ( 1975, p .49). R abbit was, h owever, t he d ominant ( 94%) s pecies i n t he M esolithic l evel a t C hateauneuf-lez-Martigues, a nd w as a lso i mportant ( in u nspecified I nterest
p roportion) i n
p ursuing
a t
S oubeyras
s everal
( Jarman ,
s pecies
was
1 972,
p .130) .
h eightened
b y
t he
u sefulness o f t heir a ntler a nd b one i n t ool m anufacture . R ed a nd r oe d eer a nd w ild s wine w ere t he p rimary s pecies i nvolved . A g reat d eal o f s hed r ed d eer a ntler was
c ollected
f or t ool
manufacturing .
( 1975,
p .44). Fish
r epresent
6 0%
o f
a ll
5 6
b one
c ollected,
o ne-half
o f
i t
T ABLE
1 8
P REHISTORIC F AUNA F ROM V LASAC N o.
D OMESTIC C anis f amiliaris
( dog)
1 914
M NI
6 .58
1 60
54
0 .19
4/ 5
2 2 6 732
0.07 2 3.13
4 90
W ILD U NGULATES B os p rimigenius
( aurochs)
R upicapra r upicapra ( chamois) C ervus e laphus ( red d eer) C apreolus c apreolus S us s crofa
( roe d eer)
( wild s wine)
5 10
1 .75
19
1 185
4 .07
28
C ARNIVORES F elis s ilvestris L ynx l ynx ( lynx) M ustelidae
( wild c at)
( weasel)
7 /8 2
8 )
M artes m artes ( pine m arten) M eles m eles ( badger) U rsus a rctos ( brown b ear) C anis l upus ( wolf) V ulpes v ulpes ( red f ox) S mall c arnivore R ODENTS
4 5) 5 ) 248) 5 8) 1 68) 1 03) 3 0) 1 3)
2.33
38 8 10 10 6
& I NSECTIVORES
C astor f iber
( beaver)
7 1)
S ciurus v ulgaris ( squirrel) L epus e uropaeus ( brown h are) E rinaceus e uropaeus ( hedgehog)
5 ) 2 2) 1 )
9 0 .34
B IRDS P elecans c f. o nocratalus
( white p elican)
3 )
P halacrocorax c arbo ( cormorant) E greta a lba ( great w hite e gret) A nas p latyrhyncho ( mallard) A nas c reca ( teal)
3) 2) 2) 2)
A ythya n yroca ( ferruginous d uck) M ilvus m igrans ( black k ite)
1) 5)
A quila h eliaca ( imperial e agle) H aliaetos a lbicilla ( white t ailed e agle)
6)
S trix a luco ( tawny o wl) C arrulus g landuarius ( jay) P ica p ica
27) 2) 1)
( magpie)
4)
C orvus c orax ( raven) u nidentified b irds
4) 87)
5 7
0 .50
3 4 1
T ABLE
1 8
( Cont'd)
R EPTILE Emys o rbicularis
( pond t ortoise)*
3 17
1 .09
F ISH C yprinus c arpio C yprinidae
*A t
( carp)
1 552) 5 230)
E sox l ucius ( pike) S ilurus g lanis ( catfish)
1) 1 283) 2
o ther f ishes
8 372)
( unidentified)
l east s ome s howed b urning a nd b utchering m arks
5 8
5 9.95
( 1975,
p .49)
T ABLE
1 9
H ABITATS O F V LASAC F AUNA H abitat
F auna
R iverine
f ish, w aterfowl, p ond t ortoise
D ense f orest
n on-riverine b irds, a ll m ammals e xcept c hamois a nd a urochs
O pen f orest o r h igh t o m edium m ountains
c hamois,
P lains,
a urochs
f orest s teppe
( outside G orge)
5 9
e agle
b eaver,
u nidentified.
N o
a ttempt
t o
e stimate
t he
t otal
n umber
o f
f ish
o r
t he
weight o f f ood t hat t his mass o f b ones r epresent i s r eported , b ut we d o l earn t hat s ome c atfish weighed o ver 1 00 k ilograms a nd l arge s pecimens o f c arp weighed 1 5-20 k ilograms s tates l ater
t hat
u ngulates
p ublication h e
p rovided i s
( 1975,
m ore
e quivocal
o n
O bservations
p .50) .
m eat
Bökönyi n evertheless
t han
t his
f ish
p oint
( 1975,
( 1978 ,
p .37) .
I n a
p .168) .
o n S ample B ias
F ish F auna A n umber
o f
a re
r elevant
t o
t he
f ish f auna .
i ssues t he
C asteel
t he g reat p otential
i n
r ecent
c ollection ,
l iterature
o n f aunal a nalysis
p articularly
w ith
r eference
t o
( 1976) h as a rgued a nd a ttempted t o d emonstrate
i n a nalyses
s ubsistence s ystems. n umbers,
r aised
V lasac
o f
f ish
He d iscusses
r emains
f or
t echniques
r econstruction
o f
f or e stimating s ize,
a nd s easonality f rom f ish s cales a nd g ives s everal e xamples
inferential c limate c hange r econstruction b ased o n c hanges s pecies' f requencies a t
s everal C rimean s ites .
I t
i s
a rgued
o f
i n f ish
b y B ökönyi
( 1978) and most o thers writing o n t he I ron G ates Gorge ( see t he I ron G ates C omplex A tlas) t hat c limatic f luctuation within t he G orge was a lways l ess p ronounced t han i n t he s urrounding e nvironment b ecause o f t he
n atural
s heltering
e ffect
humidity and warmth o f
o f
c anyon walls
t he r iver,
b ut
i t
i s
and
t he
s tabilizing
l ikely t hat a dditional
i nsights c ould b e g ained b y a r e-analysis o f t he f ish b one. importantly, r ecovery t echniques, ( as d iscussed b y Payne, p robably h ad a p articularly p owerful b iasing e ffect a t V lasac . ( 1975)
and Limp
a nd Reidhead
( 1979)
b oth
More 1 975) P ayne
s pecifically m ention b ias
against t he r ecovery o f f ish b ones when water s ieving i s n ot u sed. L imp a nd R eidhead ( ibid, p .75) f urther c laim t hat s ome f ish b one s imply d oes
n ot
p reserve
n ormally
e aten
f or e xample ,
u nder
whole
most
b y
c onditions,
m any
a nd
p eoples.
I n
a p opular workers' f ood i s
t he
t hat
s ome
N orthern s mall
small
f ish
Y ugoslavia
f ish ,
Smaris
a re
t oday, smaris,
which i s e aten whole ( fried) . ( Pollen a nalysis w as d one o n c oprolites ( human?) f rom Vlasac, b ut n o mention i s made i n t hat r eport o f o ther kinds
o f
i nclusions
( Cärciumaru,
1 978).
G arson
( 1980,
p .566)
h as
c oncluded t hrough a rcheological t esting t hat even with u se o f a 1 /8" mesh s creen , u p t o 9 9.7% o f s mall r emains a re m issed . T his c onclusion was b ased o n a c omparison b etween 1 /8" s creen r ecovery a nd f lotation r ecovery
r ates.
C onsidering a ll
t hese d our f orecasts,
i t
i s
r emarkable
t hat 6 0% o f a ll b one r ecovered a t Vlasac was f ish, s ince n o s creening was
d one . L imp
c hannel
a nd Reidhead
f ishing ,
a s
( 1979,
a t V lasac ,
p .70) h ave s uggested i nvolves
more e laborate t echnology t han d oes b ackwater l akes where s pawning a nd
a m uch
t hat
h igher
major r iver
l abor
i nput
a nd
t he f ishing o f s till o xbows a nd s easonal
f looding c ause f ish t o
mass. T hey a lso s uggest ( ibid , p .76) t hat t he r elative p roportions o f g iven k inds o f f ish i n t he t otal r iver b iomass c an b e u sed t o s uggest t he a rcheological b ias : c ompletely
absent
f or e xample
f rom
t he
i f
o ne v ery s mall s pecies
a rcheological
r ecord
o f
o f
f isher
f ish , f olk,
r epresents, s ay, 5 0% o f t he t otal b iomass o f t he r iver, t his i s s uggestive o f an under-representation o f f ish among t he f auna and o f s mall f ish among t he
f ish .
6 0
Only
t hree
s pecies,
c arp,
c atfish a nd p ike a re
r epresented a t
V lasac--the t hird, a nd b y f ar smallest o f t he t hree, p ike, b y o nly 1 1. b ones. C arp a nd c atfish a re b oth l arge f ish, a nd t his p articular s ample c ontains e xtremely l arge i ndividuals , a lthough B ökönyi d oes n ot i ndicate w hat p ercentage o f t he b ones f ell i nto t he l argest s ize r ange . T his p art o f t he D anube t oday c ontains a t l east 6 2 s pecies o f f ish , 1 4 s pecies o f amphibians a nd 1 6 r eptiles . ( The I ron G ate C omplex A tlas, p .179) . I t i s o f c ourse d angerous t o a ssume modern f aunal l ists r epresent t he r eality o f 8 000 y ears a go . T hey a re l ikely t o b e a m uch r educed v ersion o f what was a vailable f or t he V lasac i nhabitants . F rom t he amphibians l isted, n one a re i n e vidence a t V lasac. O f t he 1 6 r eptiles, o nly t he p ond t ortoise ( Emys o rbicularis) i s f ound a mong t he f ood d ebris a t V lasac. Many o f
t he f ish a re e aten t oday i n a ddition t o t he c atfish ,
c arp ,
a nd p ike e videnced a t V lasac. O f t he f our most c ommon modern f ish , n one h ave b een i dentified f rom V lasac o r Lepenski V ir. A ll f our a re q uite s mall c ompared t o t he t hree s pecies which h ave b een i dentified . A much more v aried l ist h as b een p ublished f or C uina T urcului, i ncluding n ine s pecies, t wo o f which , b ream a nd s terlet , a re among t he f our most a bundant f ish t oday. T he most c ommon f ish o f a ll, t he b arbel,
i s s till m issing,
a s i s
t he s mall B lack S ea v imba.
L ooking a lso a t t he f aunal l ist f or O strovul B anului ( see b elow) , ac lear p attern b egins t o emerge. O f t he 2 7 f ish c ommon e nough t o b e worth m entioning i n t he m odern D anube, m ost o f t he l argest o nes h ave b een i dentified a t o ne o r a nother s ite . T he n otable e xception t o t his i s t he B arbel, ( Barbus b arbus), which a lthough i t i s n ot v ery b ig ( up t o 4k ilos a nd r arely t o 1 0 k ilos) i s a s b ig a s s ome o ther f ish which d o o ccur a rchaeologically . O ne would e xpect t his f ish t o o ccur b ecause i t i s t he most a bundant s pecies i n t his p art o f t he D anube. The f act t hat t he r oe a re p oisonous c annot b e r uled o ut a s a n e xplanation, b ut i t s eems u nlikely. An e xamination o f t he d ata a vailable o n m odern f ish s pecies a nd t heir r elative importance s uggests t hat: d iminished i n r ecent t ime , w hich would o f
s pecies v ariety may h ave c ourse a ffect t he r elative
i mportance o f r emaining s pecies; t he p resence a nd a bsence o f v arious s pecies a rcheologically , c ompared t o m odern s pecies l ists s eems t o b e r ather s traightforwardly d etermined b y s ize . The l atter o bservation a dds m ore w eight t o t he a rgument f or u nder-estimation o f t he i mportance o f f ish i n t he o verall s ubsistence s ystem i n t he Mesolithic i n t he r egion , a nd a t V lasac i n p articular. The
l isting o f
modern
s pecies
i nhabiting t he D anube,
a lthough
c rude , i s t he b est a pproximation o f t he a ncient p otential r esource b ase t hat was a vailable. A side f rom t wo b arbed h arpoons ( Srejovi6 a nd L etica, 1 978, p . 86), t here i s n o d irect e vidence o f t he t echnology o f f ishing. One c an o nly i magine n ets with s inkers, wooden s pears with s tone p oints a nd p robably b oats--for a ll o f which t here i s n ot a t race o f g enuine e vidence . N albant ( 1970, p .43) i n d iscussing t he f ish f rom C uina Turcului, c omments o n t he d iversity o f s izes o f f ish mixed t ogether a t t hat s ite a nd s uggests t hat b ackwaters a nd v alleys were a rtificially f looded, t hen b locked o ff a nd d rained, a llowing l arge
6 1
s cale c ollecting o f a ll s hapes a nd s izes o f f ish , w ith n o s pecialized t echnology f or d ifferent f ish s pecies . T he D anube was e verywhere i n . t he
G orge
a swift-flowing,
d eep
a nd
d angerous
r iver
u ntil
c ompletion o f t he n ew d am , a nd f ishing i t b y whatever m eans, r equired c omplex s olutions.
t he
m ust h ave
S ample b ias c ausing u nder-representation o f f ish a nd o ther a quatic f auna a t V lasac i s s uggested b y t he p resence o f o nly a f ew v ery l arge s pecies o f f ish a nd b y t he l ack o f water s ieving . T he n ecessity f or h eavy t echnological i nvestment t o p erform e ven a moderate amount o f f ishing m ay s uggest t hat o nce t hat i nvestment h ad b een m ade , t he m ost e fficient a ction would h ave b een t o m aximize f ishing i ntensity . I t i s s uggested , t hen , b ut n ot d emonstrated , t hat t he i mportance o f f ishing r elative t o h unting was m uch g reater t han h as i n a nalyses o f t he e conomy o f V lasac.
b een g enerally
s ugge3ted
M ammalian F auna R eturning t o t he m ammals, P ayne ( 1975, p p . 1 8 a nd 9 ) h as t ested t he r ecovery b ias with t hree a nimals b y c omparing r ecovery without s creening t o r ecovery u sing 3mm s creen . T wo s eparate p atterns e merged : 1 ) r ecovery r ates v ary widely, f rom 5 % t o 3 4% ; and 2 ) r ecovery r ates without s creening s howed c onsistent b ias t owards l arger a nimals - 4 4% o f t he p resumed t otal c ow, 6 % o f t he s heep/goat, a nd 0 % o f t he r abbit were r ecovered i n t he t est b y t rench-sorting . A s econd k ind o f s ample b ias p roduced a b ias t owards l arger b ones o f t he s ame a nimal ( Payne, 1 975, p.11), s o t hat s amples s carce i n c arpals, t arsals a nd p halanges r elative t o l imb b ones, a nd s carce i n s ingle t eeth m ay b e s uspected o f b eing e specially b adly b iased . I t i s n ot p ossible t o a ssess t hese v ariables f rom B ökönyi's p ublished r eport. The f act
t hat o f
t he modern smaller mammals o nly
t he s quirrel
( Sciurus v ulgaris) was i dentified f rom V lasac ( by 5 b ones) s uggests s ample b ias . Whether t hey w ere u tilized o r o ccurred n aturally , t here c ertainly o ught t o h ave b een a n a bundance o f small r odents a round t he s ite . C omparisons b etween a rcheological a nd m odern l arger m ammals a re l ess i nformative, b ecause l arger a nimals a re i f anything o verr epresented i n b iased s amples, a nd b ecause h unting a nd i ntroduction o f d omesticated a nimals h as p robably h ad a b igger impact o n l arge wild a nimals t han o n o ther f auna. Numerous a uthors ( S mith, 1 975, 1 979, Lyman,
1 979,
Grayson,
1 979) h ave d iscussed t he p roblems
o f
b ias
i n
u sing m inimum n umbers o f i ndividuals r ather t han b one c ounts, a nd o f e xtrapolating t o a ctual meat y ields. Meat y ield, f or e xample, c an n ever b e p recisely f igured, b ecause i n a ddition t o v ariables s uch a s s eason , v egetational m aturity , c limate , a ge a nd s ex which a ffect a nimal l ive
w eight,
t he
d efinition
o f
what
c onstitute
t he
e dible p ortions
o f
t he a nimal i s c ultural, a nd known e thnographically t o v ary widely ( Lyman , 1 979, p .536; S mith , 1 979, p .158) . S mith s uggests ( 1979, p .157) l isting a ll s pecies i n t he h abitat, c alculating t he p ercent o f c ontribution o f e ach t o t he t otal b iomass a nd t hen c omparing t hat w ith t he p ercent c ontribution
o f e ach t o
t he
t otal
m eat
w eight
c aptured
i n
t he a rcheological r ecord . P ercents w hich a re q uite d ifferent f or t he s ame s pecies would i ndicate e ither p ositive o r n egative s electivity. This
method
o f
c ourse
i gnores
d ifferences
6 2
i n
t he
amount
o f
e ffort
r equired t o h unt d ifferent a nimals . A t V lasac , a lthough h igh i nitial l abor i nvestment was p robably r equired f or f ishing , t he r eturn p er u nit o f w ork was p robably c onsistently h igher t han t hat f rom s talking t he s olitary r ed d eer i n a h eavily f orested v alley , e ven i f t he d ensity o f t he r ed d eer p opulation i tself was v ery h igh. One m ight t hus a rgue t hat t he l arge q uantity o f r ed d eer h one a nd a ntler r eflect a g reater s electivity t han i ts s traight p erc-ntage r ank i n t he t otal b iomass m ight i ndicate . Grayson ( 1979, p .210) p oints o ut t hat when e stimating m inimum n umbers o f i ndividuals, t hat n umber i s m aximized b y d ividing t he s ample i nto t he g reatest n umber o f u nits. B ökönyi 's m inimum n umbers t herefore a re t ruly m inimal , a s h e t akes t he e ntire s ite a s t he u nit o f a nalysis . This a pproach o f c ourse o bliterates a ny c hange t hrough t ime i n t he t hree major o ccupations o f Vlasac . The r ank o rder importance o f f auna--fish, r ed d eer, p ig , o thers,--is l ess s ubject t o e rror, a s t he d ifferences i n p ercent a re s o l arge b etween t hem: t han 2 % . ( Dog i s m ore b ecause B ökönyi a rgues f or e ating) .
6 0%, 2 3%, 4 %, l ess
i mportant t han w ild p ig , b ut I h ave l eft i t o ut c onvincingly t hat d ogs were n ot k ept p rimarily
Overview a nd C omparisons T urning t o o ther s ites i n t he s ame a rea , L epenski V ir 's f auna were a lso a nalyzed b y B ökönyi. T he r esults a re p resented i n T able 2 0. A much smaller s ample, 3 000 t otal, was c ollected, a nd i s a nalyzed i n t hree u nits a ccording t o t he t wo M esolithic a nd o ne N eolithic l evels i nto which t he s ite h as b een d ivided b y t he e xcavator . T he p ercentage c ontribution o f f ish i n l evel I , a bout 5 7%, i s s imilar t o t hat a t V lasac a s a re r ed d eer, 2 7%, a nd p ig, 2 %, ( Bökönyi, 1 970, p . 1 703). D omesticated d og , a bout 5 % o f t he b one , i s a lso c omparably c ommon , b ut i t i s n ot t he s ame v ariety a s t he V lasac t ype -rather t he " palustris" d og n ormally a ssociated with t he e arliest N eolithic i s r epresented ( Bökönyi , 1 975) . A urochs i s m uch m ore f requent ( 3.30%) t han a t V lasac , a nd i s more f requent h ere t han wild p ig. R oe d eer, marten, b adger, b eaver , a nd b irds w ere a lso p resent i n v ery s mall n umbers . ( Bökönyi , 1 970, p . 1 703). I n P hase I I, d omestic d og i ncreased t o 1 1% and r ed d eer t o 5 4%,
while f ish f all d ramatically t o 2 6% .
I n P hase I II,
t he
e arly N eolithic, r elative p roportions o f d omestic a nimals a re u nlike H ungarian p lain s ites i n t he h igh p ercentage o f c attle ( 16%) a nd d og ( 6%) a nd l ow p ercent o f s heep/goat ( 3+%) -f or a t otal o f j ust 2 5% d omestic a nimals. Red d eer ( 36+%) a urochs ( 7+%) wild s wine ( 9%) a nd f ish ( 15%) make u p t he b ulk o f t he r emaining 7 5%. A lthough t he r elative p roportions o f important a nimals i n L epenski V ir I a re q uite s imilar t o V lasac, t he f aunal l ist i s a g reat d eal s horter a nd t he b one s ample i s v ery small ( total: 4 24). D ata o n which p arts o f s keletons a re r epresented a re n ot a vailable. B irds, s o v aried a t V lasac, a lthough t hey r epresent o nly .5% o f t he t otal, a re r elatively more a bundant a t L epenski V ir ( 1.4%) b ut r epresented b y o nly s ix b ones . T he s mallest o f t he t hree f ish a t V lasac , t he p ike , i s m issing a t L epenski V ir, a s a re t he s mall s quirrel a nd h edgehog. T he l east f requently o ccurring
s pecies
a re
m uch m ore
l ikely
t o
b e
m issed
c ompletely
b y
t he
m ost h urried e xcavation t echniques, a nd t he s mallest a nd m ost d elicate b ones a re a lso d ifferentially a ffected . A lthough i t s eems r easonable t o a ccept t hat f ish d ecreased r elative t o r ed d eer f rom p hase I t o
6 3
P hase I II
4- 0 0 c h H L r l C V 0 4- 0 0 c V N C r )- 0 0 C r ) L r t O N C r ) 0 C V r • f C r ) 0 ,i cY 1 ,4" • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • % . 0 C O 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0
V C V V : ), 4- C
h -
Cr ) N •
C O
0 C T % 0 0 s t 0 • • • c 1 0 C V
) C r
P REHISTORIC FAUNA F ROM L EPENSKI
u
I f ) e • •
0
c v •
N . 0
a \ 0
4 1 / 0
•
0
C r )
v . ) 0 % e l • • c • I
t r )
% S ) C r )
C O C )
1 4 C O
r — I • r I
c n
• — • 4 i
z
S us s crofa
9 4
D OMESTIC
T ABLE
2 0
0 4 ' • C r )
^ f
C N
0
C O 4 3 " 0 C O 0 4 & C . ) C O c o
0
X 0 4 4
C O C D
, .
U ) I
4 1 J
, i4
$ 1 C )
,' " N
1 : 5 Q ) $ . 4 C O' 11 0 1'—'
VD CI
I ON I • 0 C f l C • J
. I-
I / 10 4 I 0 I c ' s 4
P hase I I
C • 1 c • I
L . r-1
4 ) 0 0
c c
c n
•
4 4 . 4 ) • c . )
( 1 ) C l )
C l ) 4 1 C I S r i
•
C J ) • , . 1 • r 1 p . r i
4 1 :0 :0
• , ‘ C L )
p c 1 0
4 4
p hase 2 , a nd d ecreased f urther f rom p hase 2 t o 3 , t he a ctual e xtent o f t he s hift i s s uspect , a s a re t he h igh f requencies o f a urochs a nd c attle r elative t o s heep/goat a nd f ish, a s t he l atter t wo a re m uch smaller, a nd f ish e specially h as a ll t he p roblems o f p reservation , e tc. d iscussed a bove. L epenski Vir p hase I may b e t he b eginning o f t he s hift i n f ish/red d eer r atios away f rom t he f ish h igh V lasac, b ut d ifferences i n e xcavation t echniques Lepenski V ir d ifferentially a ffecting t he r ecovery o ther s mall f auna may mean t hat t he a pparent s hift s ample b ias .
l ike
p oint a ttained a t a t V lasac a nd a t r ate o f f ish a nd i s a n a rtifact o f
F aunal r emains f rom Padina ( see T able 2 1) a re i n s ome r espects t hose f rom V lasac a nd Lepenski V ir . S everal h ouse f loors a t
P adina
h ave
b een
d escribed
a s
h aving
f loors
" covered
b y
a h eaped
m ass
o f f ishbone" . 3 t o . 4 meters t hick ( Jovanovig , 1 969, p .29). T he presence o f b ones o f d omesticated c ow, s heep/goats, a nd p ig ( in a ddition t o t he unsurprising d og) i n P adina A , t he l evel which a ll a rcheologists a gree i s Mesolithic, m ay b e e xplained b y m ixing o f a rtifacts o n t his multi-component s ite, p articularly b ecause o f t he s teep n atural s lope o n which t he s ite i s l ocated ( Clason , 1 980, p .144) . T he p resence o f d omesticated p ig i n P adina A m ight a lso b e i nterpreted a s e vidence o f l ocal d omestication, a s h as b een s uggested b y B olomey ( 1973) f or t he s ite o f I coana ( Clason , 1 980 , p .157 a nd s ee b elow) . I n P adina B ,
t he
l evel
which
s ome h ave a rgued i s e arly N eolithic,
o thers Mesolithic, i t s hould b e n oted t hat t he o nly well r epresented d omesticate i s t he d og, while 8 0% o f a ll b one i s f ish ( Clason, 1 980, p .171) .
T here i s n o o bvious r eason why r ecovery o f f ish r emains a t
P adina s hould h ave b een m ore e fficient t han a t V lasac a nd L epenski V ir . There were n o v ery small f ish o r mammals r ecovered a t a ll . A f aunal a ssemblage which i s 8 0% f ish , a nd where t he m ost i mportant m ammal i s r ed d eer , d oes n ot i ndicate a n e conomy b ased o n f ood p roduction , e ven i f t he s mall n umber o f b ones o f d omesticated c ows, s heep/goats, a nd pigs r eally b elong t o Padina B , r ather t han r epresenting " contamination" f rom h igher l evels o f t he s ite . T he p resence o f t hese b ones, a nd t he s mall n umber o f s herds a lso r eported f or P adina B , m ay i ndicate c ontact w ith n eighboring f ood p roducers-but h ardly j ustifies c alling t his o ccupation N eolithic. Whether t he s herds a nd b one o f d omesticates " belong" i n P adina B i s o f i mportance i n t he c hronological ordering o f t he Iron Gates s ites, but d oes not c hange t he i nterpretation o f t he p rimary, economic o rientation o f P adina B . S ince d ecreased importance o f f ish i s t ypical o f t he e arliest N eolithic s ites c ompared t o l atest Mesolithic s ites i n t he Gorge, t he importance o f f ish r emains a t P adina B a rgues s trongly f or t he i nterpretation o f t his s ite
a s
a t ruly M esolithic o ne .
n t he R omanian s ide , h as C uina T urcului, t he n earest o f t he s ites o t V lasac ( see C HRONOLOGY t wo l evels, b oth o lder t han t he o ldest l evel a ave a l ot o f b ird b ones, AND DATING). T he o lder l evel i s r eported t o h ather i ntense f ishing t he younger l evel b ones s uggesting " ..a r . art o f t he d iet." a ctivity. Tortoises, mussels a nd s nails were p s l isted i n T able 2 2. ( Bolomey, 1 973b , p . 1 97) . Mammals were a P reliminary work o n t he f ish h as
i dentified
2 3.
6 6
t he s pecies l isted i n T able
T ABLE 2 1 P REHISTORIC F AUNA F ROM P ADINA* L ate M esolithic
E arly N eolithic
D OMESTIC B os t aurus
( cattle)
Ovis/Capra ( sheep/goat) S us d omesticus ( pig) C anis f amiliaris ( dog)
7
2 1
6 1 2 4 2
6 5 179
W ILD E rinaceus e uropaeus
( hedgehog)
L epus c apensis ( brown h are) C astor f iber ( beaver)
4 37
V ulpes v ulpes ( fox) C anis/lupus ( dog/wolf)
6
C anis l upus ( wolf) M artes m artes ( pine m arten) M artes s p. ( marten) F elix s ylvestris ( wild c at) L ynx l ynx ( lynx) M eles m eles ( badger)
6 3 3 4 2 1
U rsus a rctos ( brown b ear) E quus s p. ( horse)
30 1
S us s crofa ( pig) S us s p. ( pig) C apreolus c apreolus ( roe d eer) C ervus e lephus ( red d eer) B os/cervus B os p rimigenius ( aurochs) B os s p. R upicapra r upicapra ( chamois) Ayes
( birds)
Emys o rbicularis
5 5 23 37 763+114 4 1 28 1 7 3
3 3 2 4 5 2 1 5 5 0 1 0 9 2 63+50 1 2 8 2 0
1 6
4
1
1
( European p ond
t errapin)
1 1 1 0
F ISH H ucho h ucho
1 5
( Danube s almon)
8 A cipenser s p./Huso h uso ( sturgeon) 201(24) S iluris g lanis ( cat f ish) C yprinus c arpio C yprinidae
80
( carp)
u nidentified T OTAL * f rom C lason ,
1 980,
p .148
6 7
4 1 5 5 1298 32 29 2
63
620
1 653
2 959
T ABLE 2 2 C UINA T URCULUI M AMMALS*
T axon
C ommon N ame
S us s crofa
w ild s wine
C astor f iber
L evel I ( earlier) N o/MNI M NI%
L evel I I N o/MNI
M NI%
18/7
1 7.7
6 /1
2 .3
b eaver
7 2/7
1 7.7
5 2/4
9 .5
C apra i bex
i bex
7 4/5
1 2.2
11/8
1 9.4
R upicapra r upicapra
c hamois
6 2/3
7 .3
4 9/5
1 2.0
C anis l upus
w olf
3 5/3
7 .3
4 9/5
1 2.0
M artes s p.
m arten
2 9/3
7 .3
1 0/2
4 .7
C apreolus c apreolus
r oe d eer
1 6/3
7 .3
1 /1
2 .3
A lces a lces
E uropean e lk
1 4/3
7 .3
5 /1
2 .3
U rsus a rctos
b rown b ear
2 3/2
5 .0
2 /1
2 .3
B os/Bison
b ison
5 /1
2 .2
6 8/6
1 4.2
L epus e uropeaus
b rown h are
1 /1
1 .0
2 7/2
4 .7
V ulpes v ulpes
f ox
14 /1
2 .2
1 5/2
4 .7
E quus c aballus
h orse
2 /1
2 .2
3 /1
2 .3
F elix s ilvestris
w ild c at
1 /1
2 .2
1 /1
2 .3
C ervus e laphus
r ed d eer.
-
0
2 1/1
2 .3
P utorius p utorius
E uropean p olecat
-
0
1 /1
2 .3
4 66/41 *f rom A olomey,
1 973a ,
p .42
6 8
4 20/42
T ABLE 2 3 C UINA T URCULUI P RELIMINARY F ISH F AUNA*
T axon
C ommon N ame
A bramis b rama
b ream
C yprinus c arpio
c arp
L evel
I N o .
1 33
L evel
I I
4 3
2
C yprinidae s p.
7
L euciscus c ephalus
c hub
4
S iluris g lanis
c atfish
3
E sox l ucius
p ike
S tizostedion l ucioperca
p ike-perch
P erca f luviatilis
p erch
A cipenser r uthenus
s terlet
4
A cipenser g uldenstaedti
R ussian s turgeon
7
* f rom N albant,
1 970,
p . 4 1-42;
1 1 0
2 5
1
G raf,
6 9
1 968
N o .
V eterani Terasa,
I coana,
a nd R azvrata,
P eptera C limente I I a nd
P estera V eterani , a ll d ownstream f rom C uina T urcului , a ll a ppear t o b e. r oughly c ontemporary b oth o n o steological a nd o ther g rounds, a nd t o b e more r ecent t han C uina T urcului I I a nd s lightly o lder t han V lasac I . Only t he b one s ample f rom I coana ( level I ) i s v iewed a s r eliable b ecause b oth R azvrata a nd V eterani T erasa h ad b een h eavily e roded b y t he D anube b efore e xcavation . V eterani T erasa p roduced o nly 3 54 b ones, R azvrata 1 94 b ones, a nd P eetera V eterani a nd P eetera C limente p roduced n one. Mussels, s nails, t ortoise a nd f ish a re a ll r eported t o b e important a t I coana ( level I ) ( Bolomey , 1 973a , p .200) . Mammals w ere a s l isted i n T able 2 4 . L ess t han 1 0% o f t he b one c ould n ot b e i dentified , p erhaps a n i ndication o f h ighly b iased
r ecovery
r ates .
S ome o f t he C anis s p. b ones s uggest d omestication a nd t he p igs s how a c lear p attern o f c ulling s pecific a ge g roups a nd s ome o ther m orphological f eatures t hat m ight s uggest d omestication ( Bolomey , 1 973, p .200) . M ixed o ak f orests with marshy a reas p robably p revalent i n t hat t ime would h ave p rovided a n i deal h abitat f or p igs . F urthermore , t he a ge g roups o f p igs s laughtered i ndicates k illing a t a ll t imes o f t he y ear e xcept A pril-July, s uggesting t hat I coana was o ccupied y ear r ound . ( Bolomey, 1 973a, p .51) . Red d eer a ges a t d eath p ossibly i ndicate winter a nd s pring k illing -N ovember-April a nd A pril-July , p erhaps when r ed d eer d escended t o l ower a ltitude f or w inter f eeding . T hree e arly N eolithic ( Cri ) l evels a t C uina T urcului p roduced m ammals a s l isted i n T able 2 5 . T he whole q uestion o f what d omestication i s h ighly r elevant h ere.
c onstitutes
A t O strovul B anului, which i s a t t he v ery e nd o f t he G orge, f ish s pecies a s l isted i n T able 2 6 were i dentified . I n a g eneral c omment o n " the s ites" o f what i s c alled i n R omania " The S chela C ladovei C ulture" a nd
i n Y ugoslavia
a re
a bundant
a t
" The L epenski V ir
a ll
s ites
b ut
t hat
C ulture" B oroneant i t
i s
i mpossible
s ays
t hat
t o q uantify
f ish t heir
r emains b ecause , w ith t he e xception o f v ery l arge b ones, t he f ish b ones a re f ound i n l arge c alcified b locks, a nd n o a ttempt h as y et b een m ade t o s tudy t hem . ( Boroneant, 1 973, p .16). E uropean R ed D eer E conomies? P robably t he s ingle m ost i nfluential a rticle o n p ost-Pleistocene European e conomies i s Jarman 's, i n which h e a rgues t hat " From t he b eginning o f t he p ostglacial p eriod u ntil t he a ppearance o f t he Neolithic, most o f E urope s outh o f t he B altic was o ccupied b y h uman g roups which e xploited i n p articular r ed d eer a nd p igs, w ith c attle a nd r oe d eer a s c ommon s ubsidiaries." ( Jarman, 1 972, p .125). A c lose i nspection o f t he d ata, h owever, d o n ot s upport t his g eneralization . F aunal d ata o n 1 65 s ites a re p resented b y Jarman b ut 1 13 h ave d ata p resented o nly a s p resence/absence o f s pecies. n othing a bout t he r elative importance o f r ed
T his d eer
o f c ourse s ays a nd s wine, o r
anything e lse. The o ther 5 2 s ites h ave b one c ounts, a nd J arman g ives t he p ercentages f or t hese f or h erbivore s pecies o nly ( ibid, A ppendix 2 ) . This l imited p resentation g ives a f alse impression o f l ack o f s pecies d iversity- - o r c onversely, c oncentration o n a s mall n umber o f s pecies, which J arman i s a lso a rguing . O f t he 5 2 s ites p resented , o nly 3 2
have
t he
p rescribed
d ominance
7 0
o f
r ed
d eer,
a nd
o nly
1 1
h ave
a
T ABLE 2 4 M AMMAL S PECIES A T I COANA*
C ommon N ame
T axon
N o. o f S pecimens
M inimum N o. o f I ndividuals
7 0 MNI
S us s p.
p ig
2 ,038
4 0
3 1.0
C ervus e laphus
r ed d eer
1 ,474
2 6
2 0.2
C apreolus c apreolus
r oe d eer
2 37
1 4
1 0.9
C anis s p.
d og/wolf
2 36
1 2
9 .3
C astor f iber
b eaver
3 4
M artes s p.
m arten
4 4
R upicapra r upicapra
c hamois
2 2
F ells s ilvestris
w ild c at
M eles m eles
b adger
C anis l upus
w olf
U rsus a rctos
b rown b ear
L epus e uropaeus
9 8
7 .0 6 .2
4
3 .1
3
2 .3
3
2 .3
2
1 .5
1 6
2
1 .5
b rown h are
1 1
2
1 .5
B os/Bison
b ison
2 1
2
1 .5
L utra l utra
o tter
2
1
0 .8
L ynx l ynx
l ynx
2
1
0 .8
7 1 3 9
T otal * .from B olomey,
1 973a,
p p.
4 5,
4 ,056 4 6
7 1
1 29
T ABLE 2 5 N EOLITHIC C UINA T URCULUI M AMMALS
T axon
C ommon N ame
I %M NI
C arnivora
I I %M NI
I II % M NI
2 2
2 2
1 8
C anis f amiliaris
d og
2 4+
1 2+
1 2
C ervus e laphus
r ed d eer
1 3
1 2+
1 2
S us s p.
p ig
1 5
1 6
1 2
B ovids
9
1 9
1 8
C aprovines
7 +
9
1 2
C aproelus s p.
r oe d eer
5
6
6
C astor s p.
b eaver
2
4
6
L epus s p.
h are
2
4
T ABLE 2 6 F ISH F AUNA F ROM O STROVUL B ANULUI*
T axon
C ommon N ame
A cipenser r uthenus L innaeus
s terlet
H us h us
b eluga
( Linnaeus?)
L euciscus
c ephalus
A bramis b rama C iprinuS
( Linnaeus)
c hub
( Linnaeus)
c arpio
S h un s g lanis
b ream
( Linnaeus)
c arp
( Linnaeus)
c atfish
S tizostedion l ucioperca L innaeus *B oroneant, )
1 973,
p .16;
G raf,
p erch-pike
1 968
7 2
d ominance o f r ed d eer f ollowed b y s wine. T his i s c ertainly n ot i ndicative o f a ny c lear p attern. P art o f t he p roblem l ies i n p oorly g athered d ata, a s a bout 2 /3 o f t he s ites h ave o nly p resence/absence f aunal d ata . T here i s n o v alid way t o u se t his k ind o f d ata t o l ook a t r elative i mportance o f s pecies. R ecent r eassessments o f t he o riginal r ed d eer s ite , S tar C arr , h ave a rgued t hat m iscalculations o f n umbers o f a nimals, b ased o n c ounting s hed a ntler a s a nimals h unted , a nd f alse e stimates o f m eat y ield , h ave l ed t o t he f alse c onclusion t hat r ed d eer was t he m ost i mportant m eat a nimal ( Anderson e t a l ., 1 981, p .41) . R ed d eer would b e expected t o b e o ver-represented i n u nsieved s amples, which most o f t hese undoubtedly a re, a s i ts b ones a re among t he l argest. On t he o ther h and, i ts v ery l arge s ize would mean t hat a small MNI r abbits o r I n
r epresented i bex .
a l arge
t he I ron G ates G orge
q uantity
r ed
d eer a nd
o f
meat
s wine
r elative,
b ecome
m ore
t o
s ay,
i mportant
t hrough t ime, a nd t hey a re t he most important u ngulates a t V lasac. They a re much o vershadowed i n importance, h owever, b y f ish, which l atter J arman b asically i gnores i n h is o ft-quoted a rticle. E vidence f rom s ome s ites
s uggests t hat c oncentration o n p articular
s pecies m ay h ave b een t ypical i n t he Mesolithic , a lthough t here i s n ot m uch e vidence t o s upport t he i dea t hat r ed d eer , a nd s econdarily p igs, were m ost c ommonly t he s pecies s elected . I n t he I ron G ates G orge t here i s c lear e vidence f or s pecialization o n f ish. I n C uina T urcului I I, t he m ost i mportant m ammal i s i bex , f ollowed b y c ow, wolf, a nd c hamois ( Bolomey, 1 973a, p .42). A t t he l ater s ite o f I coana, p igs d ominate, f ollowed b y r ed d eer ( Bolomey 1 973a, C hateauneuf-lez-Martigues i n F rance
p.45, 4 6). I n s ome l evels a t p t he a nimal i s r abbit ( 95% o f a ll
b one), a t Grotto Mangiapane i n S icily i t i s wild h orse ( Equus h ydruntinus) ( 50% o f a ll b one) ( Jarman , 1 972, p .130). A t O dmut i n M ontenegro i bex a ccounts f or 6 5% o f a ll b one ( Srejovi , 1 975, p .3) , a nd r ed d eer f or 2 5% i n b oth Mesolithic l evels. A t F ranchthi C ave i n t he s outhern P eloponnese r ed d eer a ccounts f or 7 0% a nd p ig f or a lmost o f t he c ounted b one i n t he l owest M esolithic l evel ( fish b one was c ounted) , a nd f ish was s carce . T owards t he e nd o f t he Mesolithic ,
3 0% n ot r ed
d eer was e ven m ore d ominant ( over 8 0% o f t he c ounted b one) a nd p ig h ad d eclined , b ut f ish r epresented f rom 2 0-40% o f t he t otal b ulk o f a nimal b ones
i n v arious units
( Payne,
1 975b,
p .122;
and Payne,
1 973,
p p.60-
6 1). C lark ( 1952, p p.42-47) p oints o ut t hat t here i s w idely s cattered e vidence f or g reat i mportance o f f ishing i n t he Mesolithic , a nd f or a s ophisticated t echnology o f f ishing. F ishhooks a ppear i n t he Maglemosian a nd N atufian , b oats, f ish t raps, s eine n ets, weirs, a nd rong s pears a ppear i n D enmark d uring t he e arly A tlantic l eister , p p eriod . Whales w ere t aken b y t he i nhabitants o f T eviec ( Tardenoisian) C urran Point ( Larnian), Oronsay ( Obanian), a nd Denmark ( Ertebdlle). S eals a re f ound i n Obanian, Kunda, a nd Ertebdlle s ites. D eep s ea f ishing f rom b oats i s i n e vidence a ll a long t he N orth A tlantic C oast o f F rance, t he B ritish I sles, a nd D enmark, a nd a t T eviec a nd Hoedic i n B rittany,
f ish
were
m ore
i mportant
t han
h unted
a nimals .
( Clark
1 952,
p.69-85). p I n
t rying
t o
r econstruct
a p icture
7 3
o f
t he
t otal
a daptation o f
M esolithic p opulations, t he c ontribution o f p lant r esources h as o ften b een i gnored . A lthough m ost m odern s ubsistence d ata o n f oragers c ome f rom n oncomparable a reas l ike t he Kalihari o r t he t ropics, w ith t he e xception o f E skimos, t he d iets o f a ll f oragers a re p redominantly v egetable. F inal i nterpretation o f t he f aunal d ata, t hen, c annot i gnore a vailable i nformation o n p lants.
7 4
P REHISTORIC F LORAL R EMAINS P ollen a nalysis was p erformed o n c oprolites
( of unknown o rigin)
r ecovered a t Vlasac ( Cärciumaru 1 978). C ärciumaru a sserts t hat t he p aleoclimatic a nd p aleofloral e volution o n b oth s ides o f t he D anube i s i dentical , a nd t hat t his e volution c orresponds w ith t he g eneral 5 p hase Holocene e volution f or R omania worked o ut b y Emil P op ( 1929, 1 942). P op's s cheme, f ollows:
d eveloped b efore t he e ra o f R adiocarbon d ating,
1 .
p ine p hase
2 .
t ransitional p ine -larch p hase
3 .
l arch, a .
i s a s
( younger D ryas) ( Pre B oreal)
h azel a nd m ixed o ak p hase
F irst m aximum o f o ak f orest a nd l arch. L arch o n h igh e levations, e lm f requently a t l ow a ltitudes.
( Boreal)
b .
H azel m aximum a nd d ominance o f m ixed o ak o ver l arch. O ak r ecedes i n f avor o f l inden. H azelnut s uddenly s preads, i ndicating t emperature m aximum. ( Atlantic)
c .
L arch m aximum c ombined w ith a m ore m oderate m ixed o ak a nd h azel s pread o n h igh a reas. O ak d ominates t he m ixed o ak f orest. T his s ub-phase a nd p hase a re e nded b y t he a ppearance o f h ornbeam a nd b eech. ( Atlantic)
4 .
l arch a nd h ornbeam p hase
5 .
b eech p hase.
( sub-Boreal)
( sub-Atlantic)
C ärciumaru ( 1978) f its t he V lasac c oprolite p ollen r esults i nto p hase I II o f P op's s cheme . With o nly o ne e xception, n one o f t he c oprolites w ere f ound s uperposed i n t he s ame e xcavation u nit, s o t hat C ärciumaru 's i nterpretations a re t entative c oncerning s equencing o f t he s amples. What C ärciumaru i dentifies a s t he o ldest s ample, f rom s ection A /17, 1 8, l evel X I, which S rejovi " C a nd Letica ( p.c.) i ndicate a s b elonging t o V lasac I o r I I, i ndicates a f orested e nvironment , w ith 8 2.9% a rboreal p ollen . E lm d ominates ( 89.3% o f A .P.) , f ollowed b y h azel, 5 .4% , l inden 1 .4% and o ak 1 .3%. C ärciumaru a ssigns t his s ample t o s ub-phase 3 a o f P op's s cheme, c orresponding t o t he B oreal. S ample 2 , f rom b /17, l evel X VI, b elongs a ccording t o S rejovic a nd L etica t o V lasac I . Cärciumaru a ssigns i t t o P op's 3 b . I t c ontains o nly 2 9 .6% a rboreal p ollen ,
c onsisting o f
l inden 2 0% ,
h azel 4 0% a nd e lm
1 6% and s hows a d oubling i n t he importance o f C henopodiaceae a nd A rtemesia o ver t he p revious s ample . C ärciumaru s uggests t hat t he s hift i n i mportance o f N .A .P . was c aused b y h uman e nvironmental m anipulation r elated t o a nimal m anagement . H e a ssigns t his s ample t o t he p eriod o f t ransition t o t he p ost-glacial c limatic o ptimum.
7 5
Samples 3 a nd 4 f rom d /9 l evels X II a nd XXIV a re t he o nly s tratigraphically s uperposed o nes . L evel X XIV , b elonging t o V lasac I ( Srejovi a nd Letica, p .c .), h as 5 5.2% a rboreal p ollen . L evel X II, b elonging t o V lasac I I ( ibid, p .c.) h as 3 8.4% , s uggesting t he d ecline o f a rboreal p ollen t hru t ime. Aboreal p ollen i n t he o lder l evel i s d ominated b y h azel 6 1.4% , e lm 1 8% , o ak 9 .5% a nd b eech 9 .2% a nd b y h azel 4 1% , e lm 2 4 .9% a nd o ak 1 2.6% i n t he y ounger l evel . T he p redominance o f h azel i n t he e arlier l evel s uggests t he p ostglacial c limate o ptimum. The two s amples p robably a re B oreal i n a ge a lthough t hey c ould a lso e xtend i nto t he A tlantic. The e arlier s ample i ndicates a f orested e nvironment, t he l ater o ne a wooded-steppe. C erealia a re p resent i n b oth o f t hese l evels, ( they a re a bsolutely a bsent i n S amples 1 a nd 2 ) . They a re more c ommon i n t he o lder l evel ( 2.6% o f N .A.P.) t han i n t he y ounger ( .6% o f N .A .P.) a nd a re e xtremely l arge, a pproaching o r s urpassing t he d iameter l imit o f wild C erealia. C henopodiaceae a re a lso q uite a bundant i n t he e arlier l evel ( 22.3% o f r educed i n t he l ater l evel ( 2.6% o f N .A .P.) .
N .A .P.)
b ut
much
S ample 5 , f rom t rench A , l evel V III b elonging t o V lasac I I, h as 4 4% arboreal p ollen , d ominated b y h azel 3 6.7%, l inden 2 0.2%, e lm 1 1% a nd o ak 7 % . V alues f or a lder 8 .4%, p ine 7 .1% a nd l arch 5 % a long with t he a ppearance o f f ir 1 .2% , a ccompanied b y b eech i ndicate c learly t hat t his s ample b elongs t o t he A tlantic p eriod . C ereals a re p resent ( 2.6% o f N .A .P.) a nd more t han h alf o f t hem a re b igger i n d iameter t han t he l imit v alues f or w ild c ereals. C henopodiaceae a ccount f or 1 7.5% o f t he N .A .P. T here a re a lso a f ew g rains ( 1.5%) o f L eguminosae a s t here w ere i n s ample 3 ( .6% o f N .A .P.). A t I coana ( Cärciumaru, 1 973, p .59) t he c ereal g raminae a re a lso a bove t he s ize r ange f or w ild c ereals . S mall p ercentages o f L eguminosae a re a lso p resent i n 6 o f t he 8 s amples f rom I coana . C henepodiaceae r ange b etween 1 6 a nd 5 3 p ercent o f t he N .A .P. S ample 6 c ame f rom S ection a /16,
l evel I V ( Vlasac I II?) .
The
p ollen s pectrum l ooks b asically s imilar t o t hose f rom I coana, a ccording t o Cärciumaru ( 1973, p .57). Arboreal p ollen i s q uite l ow, 2 0.8%. H azel ( 41.2%) d ominates, f ollowed b y o ak 1 8.0%, e lm 1 1.0% and l inden 1 0 .5% . C henopodiaceae d ominate t he N .A .P. s trongly--65.6%, s uggesting h uman i ntervention i n t he C erealia a re p resent ( 1.4%) . i nto
P op 's
3 c
e nvironment i n f avor o f g razing s pace. T his p ollen s pectrum i s A tlantic a nd f its
s ubphase .
S ample 7 c ame f rom 6 /13, l evel X V. I t c ontains 5 8% a rboreal p öllen b ut i n p roportions not c haracteristic o f any c limatic c onditions.
C ontamination i s
I t i s d ifficult
t herefore s uspected b y C ärciumaru
t o r econcile C ärciumaru 's r esults w ith i nformation
a nd i nterpretation p rovided b y S rejovic a nd L etica. s ettlement
w as
s amples
2 a nd 4 t o t he s ame t ime p eriod?
1 ,
o ne
( 1973).
c ontinuous
o ccupation ,
i s
i t
I f t he V lasac I
p ossible
t o
a ttribute
C ärciumaru p uts s amples 1
a nd 4 i n t he B oreal , b ut s ees 3 a s b eing t ransitional B oreal-Atlantic. S amples 3 a nd 5 , b oth s tratigraphically a ssigned t o V lasac I I, a re m ore s imilar i n t erms o f p ollen s pectra, a nd a re b oth a ttributable t o t he A tlantic. S ample 6 i s a lso a ssigned t o t he A tlantic b ut i s d istinct f rom s amples 3 a nd 5 , f or e xample i n h aving a m uch l ower p ercentage o f a rboreal p ollen, a nd a much h igher p ercentage o f C henopodiaceae. I t c ould,
t herefore,
b e s een a s l ater,
7 6
a nd a ssigned t o V lasac I II.
Although t he r elationship b et ween t he pollen d ata and s tratigraphic i nformation a nd i nterpretation a re n ot c ompletely c lear ,. t hese d ata s eem t o i ndicate t hat V lasac was i nitially o ccupied d uring t he B oreal a nd o ccupied s ubsequently t wo more t imes d uring t he A tlantic. A r esolution o f t he r elationship b etween p ollen d ata a nd s tratigraphy m ight b e p ossible i f t he s pecies o rigin o f t he c oprolites were k nown ( J. A dovasio, p .c.). We d o n ot e ven k now i f a ll c oprolites d erived f rom t he s ame s pecies. [ Raikes ( 1978) h owever h as r ecently a rgued t hat t he e vidence i n E urope f or c limatic p eriods i n t he H olocene i s s o weak a nd i nconsistent t hat i t s hould b e d iscarded]. I n t he c ourse o f t hese t hree o ccupations t he v egetation a round t he s ite c hanged f rom h eavily f orested, t o q uite o pen , with n on-arboreal d omination o f C henopodiaceae. T he h eavy d ominance o f C henopodiacae , a nd t he p resence o f c ereals i n s amples 3 , 5 a nd 6 which a re l arger t han t he e stablished s ize l imit f or wild p ollen g rains, a re s uggestive o f d eliberate h uman m anipulation o f t he p lant c ommunity. Overview a nd C omparisons P ollen a nalyses f rom o ther s ites i n t he a rea a nd t ime s pan i n q uestion h ave a lso b een p ublished . P ollen a nalysis d one f or L epenski V ir s howed t ree p ollens s imilar t o t he t rees f ound t oday, with t he a ddition o f b irch , f ir a nd p ine i n t he e arliest M esolithic l evel , a nd p ine a nd w illow i n t he e arly N eolithic l evel.
( See T able 2 7).
The p ollen s pectra f rom B ile Herculane ( see T able 2 8) a nd Gura C heii ( see T able 2 9) a re s imilar t o e ach o ther i n h aving l ots o f h azel and a v ery h igh r atio o f a rboreal t o n on-arboreal p ollen . I t i s i nteresting t o n ote t he p resence o f c ereals i n t hese t wo s ites . Bile H erculane I I i s g enerally i nterpreted a s b eing P re-Boreal ( NicolgescuP lop pr a nd Pgunescu,
1 961).
A t C uina T urcului t he amount o f l inden a nd o ak i ncrease a nd t he amount o f p ine d ecreases f rom l evel I t o l evel I I. S pruce f ir a nd a lder a lso a ppear i n l evel I I. B olomey ( 1973b , p .198) i nterprets t hese c hanges a s r eflecting i ncreased p recipitation . T his i s n ot i n c onflict with t he g enerally a ccepted i nterpretation o f C uina T urcului I a s a t erminal P leistocene P leistocene.
o ccupation,
and
l evel
I I
a s
e arly
post-
P lants A s F ood P ollen s pectra a re u seful a s a n a id i n r elative d ating a nd
t he
d evelopment o f c hronologies, a nd i n t he r econstruction o f c limatic c onditions. They a lso o ffer d irect e vidence o f available p lant f ood r esources . E vidence f or a ctual r eliance o n p lant f oods b y p rehistoric p opulations i s s poradic a nd v ague e xcept u nder u nusual c onditions o f p reservation. I n t he P ost-Pleistocene p eriod i n E urope t he u sual s poradic e vidence may b e f ound. A t T eviec i n F rance t here i s e vidence f or t he e xploitation o f w ild p ear , D enmark o f y ellow water
a nd a t t he M aglemosian s ite o f H olmegaard i n l ily ( Clark, 1 952, p .48). F rom S tar C arr
( Clark , 1 954, 1 971) c omes e vidence a gain o f y ellow w ater l ilies, r ead a nd b og b eans. C henopodium ( Chenopodium s p.), s orrel, a g reen l eafy
7 7
T ABLE 2 7 P OLLEN A NALYSIS,
A rboreal p ollen ,
L epenski V ir I ( c.
T axon
L EPENSKI V IR*
5 900 B .C. u ncalibrated)
C ommon N ame
Amount
B etula s p.
b irch
J uniperus s p.
j uniper
2 0 g rams
T suga s p.
t suga
1 0 g rams
C eltis s p.
h ackberry
5 g rams
P inus
p ine
5 g rams
Abies s p.
f ir
3 g rams
F agus s p.
b eech
2 g rams
s p.
A rboreal p ollen ,
4 00 g rams
L epenski V ir I IIb
T axon
C ommon N ame
( c.
5 400 B .C.
%
Q uercus s p.
o ak
4 4
C arpinus s p.
h ornbeam
1 5
F agus s p.
b eech
1 5
P inus s p.
p ine
1 0
U lmus s p.
e lm
4
C orylus s p.
h azel
4
Abies s p.
f ir
3
S alix s p.
w illow
3
* f rom G igov,
1 972,
p .185
7 8
u ncalibrated)
T ABLE 2 8 P OLLEN A NALYSIS, ( c.
a rboreal p ollen :
8 100 B .C.
B XILE H ERCULANE* u ncalibrated)
8 2%
T axon
C ommon N ame
P inus s p. Q uercus s p.
p ine o ak
U lmus s p. T ilia s p.
e lm l inden
C arpinus s p. A lnus s p. F agus s p.
h ornbeam a lder b eech
1 5 1
B etula s p.
b irch
1
S alix s p. C orylus s p.
w illow h azel
n on-arboreal p ollen :
1 8%
2 d ecreasing 5 4 2 0
1 4 8
( decreasing)
G raminae C erealia C ompositae * f rom C ärciumaru,
5 1 .2 4 1 980,
p .93
' TABLE 2 9* P OLLEN A NALYSIS, ( c. a rboreal p ollen :
8 100 B .C.,
G URA C HEII
u ncalibrated)
9 4.85%
T axon
C ommon N ame
%
P inus s p. P icea s p.
p ine s pruce
1 -2 1
Q uercus s p. U lmus s p.
o ak e lm
1 5 -10 i ncreasing
C arpinus s p. B etula s p. A lnus s p. C orYlus s p.
h ornbeam b irch a lder h azel
n on-arboreal p ollen :
5 .15%,
G ramineae C erealia C henopodiaceae * f rom C ärciumaru, 1 980,
1 1 -2 1 -0 d ecreasing 5 0-80 i ncreasing u nevenly
d ecreasing i rregularly 2 0 .4 2
F ig.34
7 9
v egetable ( Galeopsis t etrahet), c hickweed ( bamex , s p .) , a g reen l eafy v egetable ( Stellaria media) , a nd t wo g reens ( Polygonum a viculare a nd P . p ersicaria) were i dentified f rom t he i ntestines o f t he T olland b urial . N ettle ( Urtica d ioica) , mountain a shberries ( Sorbus a ucriparia) a nd t he l eaves a nd y oung s hoots o f w illow a re a lso e dible a nd were a vailable a t S tar C arr . J ägerhaus C ave a nd F alkenstein C ave i n t he D anube V alley i n s outhwest G ermany h ad e xtensive a mounts o f h azel n ut s hells i n t heir d eposits ( Jochim , 1 976 , p .145) . At
F ranchthi
C ave
i n Greece
e arly
p lant
r emains
r ecovered b y
s ieving and f lotation r evealed o nly p istachio a nd a lmond s hells, i n g reat q uantity, p lus a v ery f ew t races o f p ea a nd v etch ( Vicia s p.). The o nly e arly c ultigen o f t he Neolithic l evel which a ppeared i n a n e arlier l evel was l entil. L entils may h ave b een c ultivated i n t he Mesolithic ( Jacobsen, 1 981, p .308). The d omesticates o f t he e arly N eolithic l evel -E mmer w heat, 6 r ow b arley, b arley a nd l entil -w ere a ccompanied b y much smaller q uantities o f p istachio and a lmond t han were f ound i n t he Mesolithic ( Renfrew, 1 973, p .68). E arly p ollen a nalysis f rom F ranchthi y ielded n o u seful i nformation ( Sheehan a nd Whitehead , 1 973) . M ore r ecently , f urther b otanical s tudy b ased o n t he u se o f water s ieving ( as well a s p ollen a nalysis) p roduced a l arge s eries o f p lant r emains ( Hansen a nd R enfrew , 1 978 , p .351) . T hree g reen l eafy B oraginaeae ( Lithospermum a rvense, Alkana o rientalis a nd Anchusa s p.), v etch, a l egume, ( Vicia s p .), p istachio ( Pistacia s p.), a nd
a lmond
( Prunus
amygdalus
B atch)
a re
p resent
f rom
t he
l ate
P aleolithic t hrough t he f inal Neolithic a t F ranchthi. B oraginaceae d ominate t hroughout t he P aleolithic, a nd t hey d ecrease a s p istachio i ncreases, t o b ecome t he d ominant s pecies i n t he Mesolithic. Wild b arley ( Hordeum s pontaneum C . K och), wild o ats ( Avena s p.) a nd wild l entils ( Lens a ll t hree m ay
s p.) a ppear i n t he l ate P aleolithic a nd Mesolithic a nd h ave b een c ultivated i n t he M esolithic ( Jacobsen , 1 981,
p .308) . T hey a re r eplaced b y d omesticated w heat, b arley a nd l entil i n t he e arly Neolithic. Wild p eas a nd p ear a re e videnced d uring t he M esolithic. A ccording t o M i i e t a l ( 1972, p .181) , o f t he m odern w ild p lants found a t L epenski Vir t oday, 1 65 a re e aten b y p eople, 1 07 a re u sed a s medicines, a nd 2 20 are e aten b y g ame a nd l ivestock. T hose e aten b y humans i nclude: h ackberry, h azel n ut, walnut, wild c herry, a pple, p ear , p lum , a nd h awthorn . M aiC e t a l ( ibid) s uggest t hat f arming a nd d omesticated a nimals, p opulation i ncrease a nd p ollution c aused b y c ommercial u se o f t he r iver h ave a ll t aken t heir t oll, a nd t hat t he v egetation was p robably much r icher i n Mesolithic t imes. We s hall n ever k now which o f t he p lant r esources w ere u tilized b y t he M esolithic i nhabitants, o r h ow important e ach o ne was. S uch i nformation would p ermit t he d rawing o f i nferences a bout p ast p opulation d ensities. O ak , f or e xample, was a nd s till i s p resent i n s ubstantial n umbers a round V lasac . S ome o f t he h ighest g atherer-hunter p opulation d ensities k nown a re r eported f or a boriginal C alifornia--where a corns
( Hassan ,
• Hazel,
s ubsistence
f ocused
o n
1 981) .
whose
n uts
d o
s pecies t hroughout V lasac's
n ot
r equire
t hree
p rocessing,
o ccupations.
was
C ereals,
a d ominant c henopodia,
a nd l egumes were a lso a vailable. C henopodia v ary h ere f rom 2 .6 t o 6 5.6% o f t he N .A .P. B oth t he g reen l eaves and t he s eeds a re widely
8 0
u sed a s f ood . M any o f t he p lant r esources p resent t oday w ere p robably a lso a vailable t hen , s uch a s h ackberry , v arious w ild f ruits, walnut a nd willow . E vidence f or c onsumption o f n ettle ( Urtica s p .) was f ound i n 4 o f t he 7 c oprolites f rom V lasac , a s well a s i n t he i ntestines o f T olland m an . P olygonaceae a re i mportant i n t he N .A .P . o f a ll s amples, v arying f rom 7 .3 t o 2 4% . A m ember o f t his f amily , s orrel ( Rumex s p .), was a lso f ound i n t he i ntestines o f T olland m an . C hickweed ( Stellaria media), a lso f ound i n Tolland man , i s a C aryophyllacea, a f amily p resent a t l ow l evels i n 5 o f t he 7 V lasac s amples. W illow ( salix s p .) i s p resent i n a ll l evels a t V lasac . B uckthorn ( Rhamnus s p .) i s p resent i n a ll b ut o ne s ample and i s q uite i mportant i n s ample 3 ( 28.1% o f N .A .P.) I t i s 9 .3% o f t he N .A .P. i n s ample 1 . Buckthorn v arieties o ccur i n b oth t he N ew a nd t he O ld World a s b ushes p roducing s weet e dible f ruit
( Hedrick,
1 919,
p .489).
A rtemisia a re p resent i n a ll V lasac s amples, v arying f rom 3 .0 t o 1 7.2% o f t he N .A .P. All v ariants r eported b y H edrick ( 1919, p .66) a re u sed a s f lavorings, p articularly i n a lcoholic b everages ( absinthe a nd b eer)
o r
i n
c ooking
L inaceae
( tarragon) .
( Flax
F amily)
a re
p resent
a nd
i mportant
i n a ll
s amples,
v arying f rom 5 .4 t o 3 1.0% o f t he N .A.P. I f
o ne
l ooks
a t
t hese
s amples
a nd a ssumes
t hat
t he c oprolites a re
h uman , a nd t hat t he p ercentage o f p ollen r eflects t he d ietary importance o f e ach p lant g roup, s ome s ort o f p attern emerges. T he r elative importance o f d ifferent c ategories v aries widely, b ut t he N .A .P. a lways h as a t l east f our , a nd a s m any a s s even , d ifferent g roups s trongly r epresented, ( more t han 4 .9% o f N .A.P.). Extreme c oncentrations o f o ne g roup o ccur o nly i n t he l ast l evel, where 6 5.6% o f a ll N .A .P. a re C henopodiaceae. T his c oncentration , a long with t he a ppearance a nd p ersistence o f o ver-sized c ereals i n V lasac I I t hrough I II, o nce a gain h ints a t h uman m anipulation o f p lant c ommunities. Overall,
t he e vidence s uggests a b road s pectrum u tilization o f
b erries, f ruits, n uts, g reen l eafy v egetables a nd s eeds b y t he V lasac s ettlers. The f inal o ccupation may r epresent t he b eginning o f a s pecialization o n s eed p lants : c henopodia , c ereals a nd g raminae , a nd i nitial d omestication, a s a t F ranchthi C ave. D iet a nd N utrition E vidence d iscussed h ere f or t he u se o f v egetable f ood r esources a t V lasac i s r elevant t o a n u nderstanding o f t he n utritional s tatus o f t he p opulation . T he o nly major d isease i n t he s keletal p opulation i s r ickets , o r o steomalacia. T his i s i nterpreted a s e vidence o f D d eficiency, which i s i ncorrect, a s d iscussed b elow ( see P REHISTORIC H UMAN R EMAINS) . T he p redominance o f f ish i n t he d iet r ules o ut t his p ossibility . D d eficiency s unshine)
R ickets i n m odern p opulations i s u sually a ssociated w ith b ecause D i s n aturally a vailable i n f ew p laces ( fish a nd
whereas
c alcium
i s
e verywhere
( dairy
p roducts,
g reen
v egetables, n uts, g rains a nd l egumes) . M ost o f t he d ietary c alcium i n o ur s ociety c omes f rom d airy p roducts, w hich w ere u navailable i n t he M esolithic . A t V lasac n uts a nd s eeds would h ave b een a vailable i n l ate s ummer
a nd
f all,
a nd
c ould
h ave
8 1
b een
s tored
t hrough
t he
w inter.
Legumes a nd g reen l eafy v egetables c ould n ot h ave b een s tored, a nd would have b een available i n l ate s pring and s ummer. The C henopodiaceae, which a re important i n a ll b ut o ne s ample, a re a n e xception t o t he r ule t hat g reen l eafy v egetables p rovide g ood s ources o f c alcium. C henopodiaceae, members o f t he g oosefoot f amily l ike s pinach,
c ontain
o xalic
a cid,
which
b inds
c alcium
a nd
makes
i t
u navailable f or a bsorption . P robably t he V lasac p opulations s uffered s easonal c alcium d eficiencies i n t he l ate w inter a nd e arly s pring when s tored n uts h ad r un o ut a nd f resh g reens h ad n ot y et b ecome a vailable . T his d eficiency would h ave b een a ggravated b y h eavier r eliance o n c henopodia . I n f act, t he e xtensive e vidence f or c alcium d eficiency a t V lasac
s trengthens
t he
h ypothesis
t hat
i mportant.
8 2
c henopodia
w ere
p robably
q uite
P REHISTORIC H UMAN R EMAINS E ighty-four g raves a t V lasac p roduced s keletal m aterial i ndividuals. S cattered f inds o f a nother 6 5 i ndividuals c ame o ver
t he
o ccupied
a rea
( Nemeskeri,
1 978,
p p.97-98) .
The
f rom f rom
1 17 a ll
g eneral
c haracter o f t hese r emains, r epresenting a t all ( females 1 63.32, a nd m ales 1 70 .53 c m) , r obust, C ro-Magnon-type p opulation , w ith a t endency t oward s ome g racilization a s t he Mesolithic p eriod d rew t o ac lose, ( Nemeskgri and S zathmary, 1 978, p p.178, 1 79) i s c onsonant with t he r eports o f t he 3 7 i ndividuals r ecovered f rom 3 0 g raves a t Padina ( iivanovi , S ., 1 974, p .153), and t he 8 5 s keletons f rom Lepenski V ir ( Nemesk6ri, 1 972, p .200). Gracilization, p articularly o f males, i s a g eneral t rend t hroughout Europe M esolithic ( Frayer , 1 978) .
i n
t he
l ate Upper P aleolithic
a nd
A n o dd f eature o f t he V lasac s keletal p opulation i s t he c ondition o f t he c lavicles . C lavicles a re t ypically r obust f or b oth s exes . " It i s p eculiar t hat t he r obustness o f t he l eft s ide i s m ore m arked i n b oth m ales a nd f emales." ( Nemeskgri a nd S zathmary , 1 978 , 1 972) . What t ask n ecessitates t he h eavier u se o f t he l eft o ver t he r ight a rm f or b oth l eft a nd r ight-handed p eople? P robably t he t ask o r t asks i nvolved were t he s ame f or b oth s exes, a nd r egularly a nd f requently p erformed o nes. F ishing, t ypically d one b y b oth s exes, a nd c ertainly a r egular a nd f requent a ctivity a t V lasac, c omes t o m ind, t hough t here p robably w ere o ther " options" t o a ccount f or t his c ondition. Lengyel ( 1978, p . 2 75) has a nalyzed t he V lasac b one f or A BO b lood g roups, a nd c oncluded t hat males a nd f emales, o n t he b asis o f t he A BO s ystem , a ppear t o b e f rom d ifferent p opulations. T he f emales a t V lasac f it r ight i n w ith t he L epenski V ir Mesolithic p opulation , whereas t he p ercentages o f A B f or t he m ales a re q uite d istinct . b lood t ype A B w ere b uried o utside t he s ettlement .
P erhaps m ales w ith S chwartz ( personal
c ommunication) h as p ointed o ut t hat c ollapsing t he 1 ,000-year t ime s pan i nto a s ingle s ample c ompletely i nvalidates a ll c onclusions a bout e volutionary c hanges t han o ne g ene p ool.
i n g enetic
f requencies o r t he e xistence o f m ore
E vidence f or P opulation R eplacement Human s keletal material o ffers d irect e vidence r elevant t o t he q uestion o f p opulation r eplacement o r c ontinuity f rom t he M esolithic t o N eolithic p eriods. O nly L epenski V ir p rovided e arly N eolithic s keletal m aterial which c ould b e c ompared w ith t he a bundant e arlier d ata . S tarcevo s keletons a re " moderately t all" a nd t end t o b e m ore g racile t han s keletons f rom t he p receding p eriod, a lthough g racile a nd r obust v ariants a re d escribed f or t his p eriod ( l iemeskeri, 1 972, p .201, p .202) . N o a rgument i s made o r s uggested f or e vidence o f p opulation a dmixture o f a f ormerly d istinct g ene p ool . 5 0Edynak N eolithic
a nd
F leish
m aterial f rom
( 1983)
h ave
a ssessed
d isplacement
t he
Mesolithic
t he I ron G ates a nd c ompared i t
m aterial , with r esults which a re h ighly r elevant o f t he t ransformation o f s ubsistence s ystems:
8 3
t o
o r
a nd
t o N ear E astern
t he
u nderstanding
Minor m icroevolutionary c hanges s eemed t o h ave o ccurred i n t he I ron G ates b etween 6 ,300 a nd 4 ,500 B .C. However , t he t axonomic c hanges were m inor a nd i n a d irection o pposite t o t he t axonomic t raits o f t he N ear E astern S amples. ( 1983, p .286). C hanges d escribed i nclude r eduction o f t he o cclusal a rea, o verall s ize r eduction a nd t he a ddition o f c usps o n molars. A ll c hanges c an b e u nderstood i n r elation t o d ietary c hanges , t o t he s omewhat s ofter f ish--heavy d iet o f
f rom t he U pper P aleolithic t he Mesolithic a nd t hen t o
t he m uch s ofter c ooked g rains a nd d omesticated m eats o f t he N eolithic . V lasac I material h as a h igh i ncidence o f c rowded a nd r otated t eeth which i ndicates i nitial r eduction i n j aw s ize -r eflective o f l ess heavy u se o f masticatory a pparatus. ( y'Edynak, 1 978a, p .17). Mesolithic m andibles o verall w ere a ssessed t o b e 2 7% m ore p owerful t han N eolithic o nes. F urther e vidence t hat j aw u se was s till v ery h eavy, a lthough r educed f rom t he U ner P aleolithic, c omes f rom t he P adina Mesolithic p opulation where Z ivanovi ( 1975, p .4) d escribes t ypical " heavy a brasion" o f m olars a nd f ractures o f t eeth . R educed u se o f j aws l eads t o a ttainment o f l ess t han maximum p henotypic s ize . This r eduction will p roduce c rowding a nd d ental d isease i n l arge t oothed i ndividuals a nd t hus s election f or smaller t eeth . The c hanges i n V lasac t eeth a nd j aws a re t he s ame a s t hose s een i n t he wolf-dogs d omesticated a t t hat s ite ( y'Edynak a nd F leish, 1 983, p .290) . The c onclusion o f t he a uthors i s t hat t he d ental d ata d o n ot s upport t he h ypothesis o f a n i mmigration o f t axonomically d istinct p eople w ith t he i ntroduction o f N eolithic e conomy ( pottery,
d omesticates,
p olished
s tone). L ongevity, Large
s keletal
F ertility a nd D ifferential B urial
p opulations
s uch
a s
t he
V lasac
o ne
a lso
o ffer
i nformation o n d emographic a nd s ociocultural q uestions. M ortality a nd f ertility r ates a re o f c ourse o nly i ndirectly a nd i mprecisely r eflected b y e xcavation r esults. N emeskgri ( 1978, p .102) a ssumes t hat m ost i nfants who d ied were t hrown i nto t he D anube o r o therwise d isposed o f , s imply b ecause i nfant m ortality a ppears v ery l ow . H e s imilarly a rgues t hat t he i nfant/child mortality a t L epenski V ir ( 14/87) i s t oo l ow a nd g oes o n t o e stimate t hat 1 00 t o 1 50 i nfant s keletons s hould h ave b een f ound. ( Nemeskgri, 1 972, p .193) . T he a ssumptions o n which t his e stimate i s b ased a re worth a b rief i nspection,
a s t hey a re l argely
f älse. H e b egins t he f ertile p eriod f or women a t 1 5 y ears which i s p robably t oo y oung , a nd a lso i gnores a dolescent s terility . H e a ssumes " total f ertility" t hat i s, n o c onscious e ffort t o c ontrol f ertility, a nd e stimates o ne b irth p er woman e very t wo a nd o ne h alf y ears. R ecent g atherer-hunter g roups o f c ourse h ave many f ertility-reducing a nd b irth-preventive t echniques which t hey p ractice with g ood s uccess. L actation o ften c ontinues f or 5 o r 6 y ears, a nd i s a well known s uppressor
o f
o vulation .
A n e xtremely h igh b irth r ate ( average n umber o f b irths p er w oman e stimated a t 8 ) i s t hen h ypothesized a nd b alanced o ff a gainst a n h ypothesized e xtremely h igh i nfant mortality r ate. R ecent r eported i nfant mortality r ates u p t o 5 0% i n 3 rd world c ountries among p opulations which h ave n o medical s ervices a re p robably b ehind t he
8 4
a ssumption H owever,
t hat
p rehistoric
i nfant
mortality
was
a lso
v ery
h igh.
t he s ocial c ontexts a re t otally d ifferent.
N emeskgri a nd L engyel ( 1978, p .246) c haracterize t he p opulation o f V lasac a s h aving o verall g ood h ealth s tatus. Many i nfectious d iseases which r equire f airly h igh p opulation d ensity w ould p resumably h ave b een a bsent. T he l arge s tature o f t he p opulation must b e weighed a gainst t he e vidences o f n utritional d iseases which h ave b een f ound i n t he s keletal m aterial i n e stimating t he o verall n utritional s tatus o f t he p opulation . O ther c ontradictory e vidence o f e ither a cute s easonal f ood s hortage o r i llness, i ndicated b y p resence o f e namel h ypoplasia i s r eported t o d ecrease t hrough t ime a t V lasac. T he f requency o f o ccurrence o f t his e vidence i s , h owever , n ot r eported f or a ny l evel o f t he s ite ( y'Edynak, 1 978b , p .616). Furthermore, t he 1 17 i ndividuals r epresented b y
t he s keletal material
must
b e a small
s ample
o f
a n
o ccupation s pan o f a bout 1 000 y ears. Whatever t he s ocial c riteria were f or b urial within t he s ettlement, i ll c hildren o r women o f c hild b earing a ge a nd p roven f ertility ( female mortality i s a t a maximum b etween 3 0-39 y ears a ccording t o t he s ample) c ould e asily h ave b een s elected f or e ither d eliberately o r t hrough f ortuitous c orrelation w ith s ome o ther v ariable . I t i s d angerous t o g eneralize t o t he p opulation when
we
h ave
n o u nderstanding
o f
t he
way
i n which
t he
s ample was
c reated. Another s tartling " fact" i s t hat l ife e xpectancy i s h igher f or m ales t han f or f emales b oth a t V lasac a nd a t L epenski V ir ( Nemeskgri, 1 978, p p .102-106 ; N emeskgri, 1 972, p .194) . A ccording t o r ecent U nited N ations S urvey D ata o n 1 44 c ountries f or which d ata w ere a vailable , i n o nly 3 3 i s l ife e xpectancy g reater f or m en t han f or w omen , a nd i n o nly 1 0 o f t hose 3 3 i s t he d ifference e qual t o o r g reater t han 1 y ear. ( Boulding , 1 976) . I t d oes n ot s eem l ikely t hat p owerful s ocial f actors o perating s electively a gainst t he s urvival o f women would h ave e xisted i n what must h ave b een b asically a n e galitarian s ociety. R ather, s elective b urial w ithin t he s ettlement m ust h ave b een p artly d etermined b y s ex a nd a ge s tatus, o r b y o ther c riteria which t ended t o c orrelate w ith
t hose . S keletons
o f
f emales
a nd
o lder
i ndividuals
a lso
t ended
t o b e l ess
w ell-preserved , ( Nemeskgri . 1 978 , p .99) s uggesting d ifferential b urial p ractices v arying with s ex a nd a ge. B oth s exes a nd a ll a ges were b uried i n e xtended p ositions ( 34 c ases) , 6 s econdary b urials o f whole s keletons w ere a ll a dult m ales, t en c remations i n V lasac I w ere a ll o f a dults, a gain s howing a p attern o f s ex a nd a ge b eing important i n d etermining t he where a nd h ow o f b urial ( Srejovi a nd Letica, 1 978, p .149) . S econdary b urials i n a bandoned h ouses w ere r eserved f or o lder a dults o f b oth s exes a t L epenski V ir ( Srejovi6, 1 972, p .119). R are s eated b urials, a nd s econdary b urials o f s kulls o nly w ere r eserved f or o lder males, a nd s econdary b urials o f mandibles f or a dult f emales ( Letica,
1 974,
p .57) . S keletal P athologies a nd N utrition
The p athology i n V lasac s keletons ( Nemeskgri a nd Lengyel,
1 978)
r aises s ome i nteresting i ssues. Eleven o f t he 2 5 c hild s keletons s howed e vidence o f r ickets , s ix o f t hese o nly i n t he m ildest d egree ( on
8 5
a s cale o f o ne t o f our). I t i s s urprising t o f ind a V itamin D d eficiency d isease i n a p opulation a s h eavily d ependent o n f ish a s t hese p eople were. D d eficiency i s a lso d escribed f or t he Padina p opulations a nd a ttributed t o t he l ack o f s un a fforded a s ettlement i n , 1 973-74, p .149). F urther p resumed e vidence o f a g orge (ivanovi6 v itamin D d eficiency a t V lasac i s f ound i n 1 5% o f t he male a nd 2 5.7% o f t he f emale s keletal p opulation 's e xhibiting o steomalacia , a s oftening a nd b ending o f t he b ones which c an e specially b egin i n p regnancy t hrough a l ack o f v itamin D , w hich d isrupts t he m etabolism o f c alcium ( ibid, p .241) . S ix o f t he c hildren with r ickets were l ess t han s ix months o ld, a t which a ge t hey would c ertainly h ave s till b een wholly b reast-fed. This i s p robably c onnected t o t he h igh o ccurrence o f o steomalacia i n w omen . S chwartz ( personal c ommunication) h as s uggested t hat a c alcium d eficiency m ight b e c ausative o f t he d isease s pectrum d escribed a bove . V itamin D f acilitates t he a bsorption o f c alcium a nd a D d eficiency m ay p roduce a c alcium d eficiency , b ut a s traight f orward c alcium d eficient d iet i s much more p lausible t han a D-deficient d iet f or a p opulation which r elied extremely h eavily o n f ish . Major s ources o f c alcium i nclude m ilk a nd m ilk p roducts u navailable i n t he M esolithic , a nd g reen l eafy v egetables. L egumes a re a " fair" s ource, a nd meats, n uts, a nd g rain a re d escribed a s p oor s ources ( Wilson e t a l, 1 975, p .156). W irtschafter ( 1942, p p .72, 7 3), h owever , g ives h azelnuts 2 87mg c alcium p er 1 00 g rams o f n uts, a nd a lmonds 2 30mg o f c alcium p er 1 00 g rams. S ince t he d aily a llowance o f d ietary c alcium f or a dults who a re n either p regnant n or l actating m ay b e n o h igher t han 4 00-500mg , o r p ossibly a s h igh a s 8 00mg ( Wilson e t a l , 1 975, p .156) , i t would s eem r easonable t o c all a t l east t hese n uts--both o f which were a vailable i n t he I ron G ates d uring t he Mesolithic--r a t her g ood s ources o f c alcium. E specially d uring t he l ate winter, c alcium may h ave b een i n s hort s upply, when s tores o f n uts were u sed u p, a nd g reen l eafy v egetables n ot y et a vailable. T he h eavily f orested a nd s teep r iver b ank would a lso h ave a fforded a s hady e nvironment, e specially i n t he winter, d uring which s eason t here might a lso h ave b een a s hift f rom f ish t o l and mammal e xploitation , r educing d ietary v itamin D . A f inal c ontributing f actor m ay h ave b een h eavy c onsumption o f c henopodia i n e arly
s pring .
A s
d iscussed
a bove ,
c henopodia
b lock
t he
a bsorption
o f
c alcium. O verall , h uman s keletal r emains i ndicate a p opulation w hich w as w ell-nourished e xcept f or c hronic s easonal c alcium d eficiencies.
8 6
N ON-CHIPPED S TONE A RTIFACTS: A S YNOPSIS B one a nd A ntler T ools S rejovi a nd L etica ( 1978) r eport a lmost 4 ,000 b one, a ntler a nd t usk t ools r ecovered f rom Vlasac I , I I a nd I II. T able 3 0 s ummarizes t hese f indings. A ntler T ools. deer, and
T he a ntler t ools a re m ost have been classified
r ed by
d eer , the
" exceptionally" r oe authors into 4
f unctional/technomorphic g roups: p ointed a rtifacts, c ylindrical a nd s emi-cylindrical a rtifacts with a c utting e dge, p erforated a rtifacts a nd b arbed a rtifacts, o r h arpoons. P ointed a rtifacts a re s ubdivided i nto p oints, d aggers a nd p rojectile h eads. P oints, m ade m ostly o n t ine t ips, a re s ubdivided i nto s ymmetrical , a symmetrical a nd c ogs, o ccurring a s i ndicated i n T able 3 1. Daggers f rom 1 6-22 cm l ong were a lso made o ut o f t ines with p olished p oints s moothed o ff where t hey h ad b een c ut f rom t he c rown o f t he a ntler . F our e xamples c ame f rom e ach o f t he t hree o ccupations. P rojectile p oints, 4 .5 t o 7 cm l ong, i nvolving a p oint a nd a o ne-sided e xtension f or h afting, were f ound i n two s ettlements: V lasac I I: 1 8; V lasac I II: 1 6. C ylindrical t o s emi-cylindrical a rtifacts with a c utting e dge were a lso s ubdivided i nto 4 f unctional/technomorphic g roups : b urnishers, h oes , a xes a nd a xe-hammers . B urnishers were u sually m ade o f t he l owest a nd t hickest p art o f t he s haft o f t he a ntler , s plit l ongitudinally , s o t hat t he a rtifact t apered i n c ross-section a nd h ad a r ounded , s patula l ike e nd. Hoes were s i milar t o burnishers except t hat t he l ongitudinal c ut o nly which was t riangular F rom i llustrations, t hose o f b urnishers, l engths.
i nvolved o ne e nd , g iving t he a rtifact a work e dge i n c ross-section , a ttached t o a r ectangular s haft. t he c utting e dges o f h oes l ook l ess a cute t han which a re l ongitudinally s plit f or t heir whole
Axes a re made o n f orked s egments,
o ne e nd o f which was c ut
d iagonally t o f orm a c utting e dge. Axe-hammers, made o n b asal s egments, h ad a l ongitudinally c ut a nd p olished e dge o n o ne e nd a nd a f lat p olished e nd o n t he o ther. C ylindrical a nd s emi-cylindrical a rtifacts with c utting e dges were d istributed a s
i ndicated i n T able 3 2.
P erforated a ntler a rtifacts were r eported a s f ragmentary
f or
c lassification .
T hirty-six which
b eing m ostly t oo
c ould
b e
c lassified
were d ivided i nto m attocks ( blade i s p arallel t o h andle, a s with a n a xe) a nd p icks ( blade i s p erpendicular t o t he h andle a s with a n a dze) . M ost f requently
t hese t ools w ere m ade o n f ork s egments
Two h arpoons w ere f ound i n V lasac I , a nd o ne o n a r ed d eer s capula.
o ne
( Table 3 3).
m ade o n r ed
d eer a ntler ,
B oth a re b arbed o n o ne s ide o nly.
B one Tools. B one t ools h ave b een d ivided i nto f lat a rtifacts a nd p ointed a rtifacts. The f lat b one t ools a re m ade mostly o n t he metapodials, and e specially t he metatarsals o f r ed d eer a nd a urochs. T hey h ave b een s ubdivided i nto c hisels, b urnishers-points, k nives a nd a xes. The c hisels a re made o n metatarsals o f a urochs. The j oint e nd i s i ntact a nd t he o pposite e nd i s c ut d iagonally a nd p olished t o f orm a
8 7
T ABLE 3 0 B ONE, A NTLER A ND T USK T OOLS*
A ntler
B one
B oar's T usk
T otal
V lasac I
4 62
1 59
4 1
6 62
V lasac I I
189 1
3 88
9 0
1 667
V lasac I II
1 076
3 77
9 9
1 552
T otal
2 727
9 24
2 30
3 881
*F rom S rejovi
a nd L etica,
1 978,
p .83
T ABLE 3 1 A NTLER P OINTS
S ymmetrical P oints ( 4.5-6 c m)
V lasac I
A symmetrical P oints ( 4-7 c m)
C ogs ( 5-9 c m)
2 5
8
V lasac I I
2 6
4 1
3
V lasac I II
2 4
4 9
6
8 8
T ABLE 3 2 ( SEMI ) CYLINDRICAL ARTIFACTS W ITH C UTTING E DGES
V lasac I V lasac I I V lasac I II
B urnishers ( 5-17 c m)
H oes (6-17 c m)
6 3
5 8
15 1
1 83
7 5
1 62
A xes (12-17 c m)
5 1 0 2
T ABLE 3 3 P ERFORATED A NTLER A RTIFACTS
M attocks
P icks
( 15-20 c m)
(16-35 c m)
8
V lasac I I V lasac I
6
II V lasac I
5
1 2 5
8 9
Axe-Hammers (8.5-10.5 c m)
( 2) 1 0 6
c hisel-like e nd . T he j oint e nds a re t rimmed s mooth . B urnisher-points a re m ade o n u ngulate m etapodials, m ost f requently r ed d eer . T he j oint• e nd i s t rimmed d own t o m ake i t f lat. F rom i llustrations t he w ork e nds l ook l ike t hose o f t he c hisels , e xcept t hat t hey a re n arrower b ecause t he t ool i s c ut o ff f ar f rom t he j oint, where t he b one i s t hinner. K nives d iffer f rom b urnisher-points p rimarily i n t hat t he j oint e nds a re e ither t rimmed away c ompletely o r much t hinned d own . Axes a re e ither p arallel-sided o r e xpanding t o t he c utting e dge. I t i s n ot c lear whether t hey a re b eveled f rom b oth s ides, o r j ust o ne. T he d istribution o f f lat b one t ools i s i ndicated i n T able 3 4. P ointed b one t ools h ave b een c lassified b y t he e xcavators a s a wls, b orers, p ins a nd p rojectile p oints. Awls with t he j oint l eft o n o ne e nd were
made
o f a urochs,
r ed a nd r oe d eer metacarpals o r t arsals.
Awls w ith t he j oint r emoved were m ade o f m etatarsals, c arpals o r u lnae o f a urochs o r r ed d eer. Awls with r ound c ross-sections a re n ot v ery d istinct
f rom
what
a re
c lassified
a s
p rojectile
p oints,
a nd
a re
m ade
f rom l arge mammals. D ouble-ended awls, with a p oint o n e ither e nd, w ere a lso m ade f rom l arge mammal b ones, a nd were t echnically t he m ost f inely m ade o f a ll b one t ools a t V lasac. B orers were m ade f rom m etatarsals o f l arge u ngulates . T he s hafts widen r apidly a bove t he t ip , which i s f lat o n t he e nd . P ins, m ade f rom l arge m ammal b one , a re c haracterized b y t hin , s harp p oints a nd t hinned b ases.
P rojectile p oints,
f rom
l arge
m ammal b one,
a re p ointed a t
o ne
e nd, with a r ound c ross-section, a nd f lattened o n o ne o r t wo f aces a t t he o pposite e nd, f or h afting. T he majority a re i ncised o n t he b ase with l ong a nd s hort l ines f orming a n et d esign . P ointed b one a rtifacts a re d istributed a s i ndicated i n T able 3 5. B oar's Tusk . O f t he 2 30 p ieces o f worked t usk, 1 12 were j udged t oo f ragmentary f or c lassification . T he r emainder h ave b een c lassified i nto f ive g roups : p unchers , p uncher-scrapers, s crapers, c hisel-axes and p endants. P unchers h ave s hort r ectangular o r o val b odies a nd s traight o r c urved, l ong t hin p oints. P uncher-scrapers a re l ike s crapers, e xcept t hat t he b ody o r h andle i s a dapted f or s craping . T he s hapes a nd s izes o f p uncher-scrapers c an b e u sed t o s ubdivide t hem i nto :
r ectangular
o r
t rapezoidal
b ody ,
c rescent
s haped ,
a nd
c rescent-
s haped with a h ollow c ut o ut o f t he c urve t o d emarcate t he t wo e nds. There were f our s crapers, r ectangular a nd c ut t o s hape o n a ll f our s ides. C hisel-axes h ave t rapezoidal o r t riangular p lan v iew s hapes. T hree r oughly r ectangular p endants h ad c ontracted n ecks, p resumably f or s uspending f rom a s tring . T he d istribution o f w orked b oar 's t usks a t V lasac i s i ndicated i n T able 3 6 . R ed d eer c anine i s a lso m entioned a s b eing u sed,
b ut n o d etails a re p rovided. C omparisons
N o o ther s ite i n t he I ron G ates r egion h as a p ublished d escription o f b one t ools which c an b e c ompared with Vlasac. G ates, p ictures a nd p assing r eferences i ndicate t he t ools
s imilar
t o
t hose
f ound
i nformation a bout t he k inds
a t
V lasac,
b ut
Within t he I ron e xistence o f b one
t here
o f b one a nd a ntler u sed ,
o r
u sually
n o
t he n umbers
i s
o f
a rtifacts f ound. A t L epenski V ir ( Srejovi , 1 972) a ntler b orers, p olishers, s crapers a nd s calpels ( sic!?) a re r eported f or l evel I a nd
9 0
T ABLE 3 4 F LAT B ONE T OOLS
C hisels ( 8-10 c m) V lasac I V lasac I I V lasac I II
2 1 1 8
B urnisher P oints (12-24 c m) 5
K nives (12-18 c m) 2
A xes (4.5-9.5 c m) 8
2 5
1 5
6
2 4
1 9
9
9 1
C 1 ) r I . r 1 CO 4 ) 4 ) C ) r I C 1 ) • " , ) 0 0 ra4
$ 4 PI
, . E C . ) 4 . i I l . r )
4 , — I
,1 . . t
1 , , 1 "
‘ . 0
C N I C . 1
, . 0
4
r . .
, L )
0 r— f
1 . ' . C • I
Ch C N 1
, i -
r .
C I
. . 1 , . .. .,
C . )
c o
0
• r i C 1 4
I 1 1
, 4
r -4 • % .0 . . . ."
. • •• ••
e
r I • C V O I • f • . " . .
c n E
C I D C . ) C V r I C O 4 I r 4 • I • , 1 I A
. i C' , 1
( , ) V Z )
Cg
CN
C O
p — I
I A
o • . , ), £ ) . .
C l . ) 4 1 C \ 1 I r l O L • r ) • t n % . . . . )
. i
L n
0 )
V lasac I II
r -I
V lasac I I
•
4 1
V lasac I
P OINTED B ONE ARTIFACTS
c o I 9 ' ) , . . ,
c o 4 . )
,. e C J
c L i " 0
se I C, )
0 )
L r ) I L n •
. 4 -
e n
L (
( " 1
• • ••
e
$ . 1
C V g t .
C. )
c L i $ 4
c n I
C . ) C / 3
. 1 -
1
I
CV ,. . . ,
4 J e •. c u c uu ) C V u4 C l ) C I ) ( 1
0 , i I C Y N '—
C l ) $ 4 a )
P uncher—Scra
C V
., s -
C l )
i
0 0
V D
O D
1• • • •
o •-•
4 ) C . ) ( 1 ) C . ) . 1-
e l
P — I
I P 0 O
C . ) . i , . . . . ,
0 . 4
, 4 , . 1
i n 1 4
r 1
V lasac I II
I
V lasac I I
E
• C ) 4 ) C . ) L A C 1 ) • • 0 0 I . 1-
P unchers
W ORKED B OAR
1 4
. . . ,
C hisel Axes
a ,
I
• ••
C . ) v 0
I
vD
0
Zr . . . .,
I I ( the p re-ceramic l evels). P ictures s uggest t he p resence o f b urnisher-polishers , k nives, a xes, c hisels, a wls a nd p endants, a lthough i t i s v ery d ifficult t o j udge, a s t he d rawings l ack b oth s cales a nd c ross-sections. At Padina ( Jovanovi , 1 971a, 197l b) c asual i llustrations s uggest t he p resence o f r ed d eer a ntler p oints, a nd b urnishers, a nd p erhaps b one b orers.
" daggers"
T he i dentification o f c ertain b one a rtifacts a s p rojectile p oints i s s upported b y t he d iscovery o f t wo s keletons a t S chela C ladovei w ith b one p oints d eeply i mbedded i n a r ib a nd i n a f emur o f o ne, a nd i n t he s kull o f t he o ther ( Nicholäescu -P lo uor , 1 976) . N o d etails a re g iven o n t hese p oints b ut f rom t he p ictures t hey l ook i ndistinguishable f rom V lasac b one p oints. S uch d eep p enetration i nto b one c ould p robably o nly b e e xplained b y t he u se o f b ow a nd a rrow. I n a g eneral a rticle o n t he S chela C ladovei C ulture, B oronearq ( 1973) d escribes a ntler h oes a nd d igging s ticks with s haft h oles i n t hem, p endants, s crapers, b urnishers a nd awls o f b oar's t usk, awls, s patulas, d aggers a nd p oints o f b oar b one. I n a m ore r ecent a rticle ( Boronearq, 1 981) , h e s pecifically l ists t he u se o f t he t hree m ain r aw m aterials f ound a t V lasac : r ed d eer a ntler , b one a nd w ild b oar 's t usk -as b eing t he p redominant r aw m aterials u sed i n t he S chela C ladovei c ulture. O n t he b asis o f i llustrations, t he b one p rojectile p oints l ook t he s ame a s t hose f rom V lasac. A s hafthole a ntler t ool f rom I coana a lso l ooks l ike t hose f rom V lasac ( Boronean;, 1 980, p .291). A r ectangular b one p endant f rom t he p ost-Pleistocene l evel a t C uina T urcului l ooks i dentical t o s everal f rom V lasac ( Päunescu , 1 970, p .21) . O ne h arpoon f ragment a lso c ame f rom t his l evel which i s d escribed a s h aving " a l ot o f b one" . R ed d eer a ntler t ools f rom O strovu Mare l ook l ike t he p oints a nd a xes f rom V lasac ( Boroneanr, 1 979b , p .38) a s d o t he b one p rojectile p oints, p ins a nd a wls f rom O strovu Mare . A s haft-hole a ntler t ool f rom A libeg , a nd s hort a ntler t ools w ith c utting e dges f rom O strovu C orbului i llustrated b y Päunescu ( 1980, p .542) would a lso f it i nto
t he V lasac
c ollection .
O n t he b asis o f a vailable i nformation , t hen , t he a ntler , b one a nd t ooth i ndustry o f t he I ron G ates r egion l ooks t he s ame o ver a s pan o f s everal t housand y ears, f rom t he e arly p ost P leistocene l ayer a t C uina T urcului t o t he t ransitional s ite o f A libeg , where g atherer-hunters m ay h ave b een t rading w ith f armers . B oronea r4 ( 1976b , p .39) a sserts t hat b one a nd a ntler t ools c ontinue r ight t hrough t he N eolithic a nd B ronze a ge. B one a nd a ntler t ools f rom t he m iddle-late N eolithic s ite o f D ivostin l ook l ike V lasac t ools, a lthough t here a re n o s haft-hole a ntler t ools f rom t he e arly N eolithic i n S erbia , s o s traight-forward c ontinuity, a t l east t o t he s outh o f t he I ron G ates, i s n ot c lear ( A. McPherron , p .c .) . E arly N eolithic s ites k nown i n t he I ron G ates r egion h ave n ot b een p ublished , a lthough B oronean Vs a ssertion o f c ontinuity c ertainly t akes a ccount o f e xcavated m aterials f rom s everal o f t hese s ites. T he r eporting o f b one t ools f rom c ontemporaneous s ites o utside t he I ron G ates r egion i s a lso q uite p oor. A t F ranchthi c ave o nly 2 2 b one t ools were f ound i n t otal, a nd s even o f t hese were d escribed " scraps" ( Jacobsen 1 973a). T he c ontrast with t he s heer v olume V lasac
material
i s
s triking.
T he
9 4
small
s ite
o f O dmut
a s o f
p roduced 5 6
h arpoons -p erhaps t his s ite was a s pecial a ctivity, t emporary f ishing c amp. An u nspecified number o f awls made o n t he metatarsals a nd . c arpals o f r ed d eer a nd a urochs, o ne b one c hisel a nd s ome b oar t usk p endants were a lso r eported . ( SrejoviC , 1 975) . A lthough O dmut i s v ery f ar away f rom t he I ron Gates, i ts b one t ool a ssemblage c ould b e a s pecially s elected ( and n on-representative) s ample o f t he t otal b one t ool k it f rom V lasac . S o l ittle i nformation i s a vailable o n b one t ools t hat i t i s n ot even p ossible t o s ay whether t he v olume o f b one t ools a t V lasac i s u nusual . S ince f ishing was a n e xtremely i mportant s ubsistence a ctivity i t i s s urprising t o f ind o nly t wo h arpoons . T he f unctions o f m ost b one t ools c an o nly b e p resumed, b ut most workers a ssume t hat s ome o f t he l arger , p articularly a ntler , t ools f unctioned a s d igging s ticks o r h oes i n t he e arly a gricultural s tage . B oronean a nd o thers h ave p ointed t o t he abundance o f h eavy b one a nd a ntler t ools a s o ne p iece o f e vidence f or t he b eginning o f p lant c ultivation b efore t he a ppearance o f t he f armers f rom t he s outh with t heir p ottery , t o t his p oint l ater.
s heep ,
e tc .
I will
r eturn
G round a nd P ecked S tone T ools O ne h undred a nd t hirty-one g round s tone t ools w ere f ound a t V lasac and h ave b een c lassified b y t he e xcavators i nto f ive more o r l ess " functional" g roups : c lubs, a xe-boulders , p olishers , p ercussion t ools a nd s ling b alls. T hey a re d istributed a s i ndicated i n T able 3 7.
m ade
" Clubs" a re e longated " baseball-bat" s haped o bjects which were f rom a v ariety o f s edimentary a nd v olcanic r ocks, a nd f rom s late ,
i n a v ariety o f e longated s hapes .
A ll o f t hem a re l eft r ough o ver p art
o f t heir s urface . T he s ize r ange i s 1 8-25 c entimeters, b ut s ome b roken o nes s uggest t hat t here w ere b oth smaller ( 12-15 c m) a nd l arger ( circa 5 0 cm) s pecimens. S ome c ould c onceivably h ave b een u sed a s p estles. Two, o ne f rom V lasac I and o ne f rom V lasac I II, a re d ecorated with b ands o f z ig z ag l ines r unning t he l ength o f t he t ool ( ibid, p .99). S imilar a rtifacts f ound a t L epenski V ir h ave b een i nterpreted a s c lubs f or
k illing
f ish
( SrejoviS ,
1 972,
p .132) .
Axe-boulders l ook l ike t he g round s tone a xes o f t he e arly N eolithic, b ut t he t hree r ecovered a re n ot a s well-proportioned o r f inely f inished a s a re N eolithic o nes .
B ased o n t he i llustrations,
t wo
o f t hem l ook l ike t hey were r oughed-out b y f laking , a nd t hen f inished b y g rinding d own t he f lake s cars--the s ame m anufacturing t echnique a s w as u sed i n t he N eolithic
a nd
( Prinz,
i n p ress).
P olishers were m ade o f h ard m aterials s uch a s g ranite a nd g abbro, h ad a U-shaped o r V-shaped c hannel. O n whole s pecimens, t he
c hannel was 3 .5 t o 6 .5 cm l ong t o 1 t o 2 cm d eep. ( Srejovi6 a nd Let c a, 1 978, p .99). These p olishers were p robably u sed i n manufacturing b one implements a nd p erhaps a rrow s hafts. The small n umber s eems s urprising . P ercussion t ools a re e gg-shaped o r d iscoidal s tones with o ne o r m ore r ound o r e llipsoidal d epressions . T hey r ange b etween 8 a nd 1 5 c m i n t he l argest d imension . ( ibid, 9, p .100). T here i s n o r eal 9
9 5
o c . 1
L n i n
A ND P ECKED S TONE T OOLS*
I
n z
c N i
% . o t r )
. 1-
c e )
C O C U , • C C O • r i , 1 0 ni
, 1
c V
c q
o r : c _ D
V lasac I II
V lasac I I
V lasac I
I
evidence that they were used as percussors. They could be unfinished aet weights - with the hole for net attachment uncompleted. Finished. net weights might well have all ended up in the river. Weights left on nets mi ght have been stored away from the houses and thus not discovered during excavation. Sli ng balls had a diameter of 2.5 to 5 cm, (i bi d, p.1OO). might also have been used as net weights.
They
It is important to note the absence of any clear seed-gri ndi ng equipment, as evidence for the exploitation of grasses, and later true cereals, in sites on the Rom anian si de as well as at Vlasac (see below). Objets d 'Art "About one hund red" non-utilitarian decorated objects, and 44 decorated utilitarian tools were reported recovered from levels I-III of Vlasac. The non-utilitarian objects were so labeled based on their lack of resemblance to any utilitarian tool types/classes and to their apparently total absence of functional attri butes or signs of use. Twenty-eight of these were roughly spherical (8-14 cm) boulders which had been pecked and/or polished and painted with red ochre. Nine were recovered from Vlasac I and from Vlasac II, and ten were recovered from Vlasac III. O ne from Vlasac II had been extensively engraved with geometric designs and with a possible stylized human figure. Other non-utilitarian decorated artifacts were engraved, primarily w ith geometric designs, and i ncluded two antler "staff-septres" from Vlasac I, three "cult- k ni ves" from Vlasac I (1) and III (2), and four "ritual spatulas" made from the shoulder blades of wi ld pig and red deer from Vlasac I (1), III (1), and II (2). The remainder of non utilitarian decorated artifacts were described as too fragmentary for classification. There were forty-four engraved objects which had the shapes of o�dinary utilitarian tools. These tools' distributions are summarized in Table 38. Comparisons The study of the art from Vlasac has been di rected towards two goals: Deciphering the meanings of the engravings, that is, what they "represent", and searching for histori cal and spatial connections to other cultures throug h si milarities in the art. These two goals are inter-related. Marshak (1981), for example,· first argues for the historical derivation of the meaning and form of all European mobilary Mesolithic art from a general European late Paleolithic tradition, and then goes on to argue the interpretation of particular geometric forms on Vlasac material on the basis of late Magdalenian material from France. Publi shed di scussions of this art are few. All authors draw basically the same conclusions. The art from the entire Iron Gates region (Vlasac, Lepenski Vir, Cuina T'urcului, Icoana, Ostrovul Banului, 97
T ABLE 3 8 E NGRAVED T OOLS*
V lasac I
B one
A ntler
B oar T usk
1 4
4
-
S tone 1
V lasac I I
8
3
1
-
V lasac I II
8
2
1
2
*F rom S rejovi6 a nd L etica,
1 978,
p p.105,
9 8
1 52
Sc ela Cladovei) is seen as essentially united, with some allowance made for chronological development (Marshak, 1981; PXune�cu, 1968; Boronean5, 1969; Srejovi�-Letica, 1978; Srejovi�, 1972). At Cuina Turcului, described as "Romanello-Azilien", all art objects are ornamented with geometric incisions. There is one geometrically incised horse phalange which is generally interpreted as a headless female torso, the breasts being expressed by the condyles of the phalange (Plunescu, 1968, p.348). The use of red ochre with burials is documented at Schela Cladovei, Icoana (Boroneanf, 1969, p.285 ), and Climente II, and is found in many upper Paleolithic sites in Europe (Boronean�, 1970). Geometric incised decorations on bone and antler are also described for Icoana I and II, S chela Cladovei II, 0 strovul Banului III, and Climente. Some of the wall painting from Gaura Chindiei II may also belong to this period (Boroneanf, 1979). The Geometric ornamentation found at Vlasac and other Iron Gates sites is neither rare nor particularly remarkable in Mesolithic Europe (Loze, 1973) . The only remarkable artistic development in the Iron Gates appears at Lepenski Vir at the very end of the Mesolithic just before the appearance of Neolithic pottery and bones of domesticated cattle, sheep-goats and pigs. This development consists of the appearance of representational, life-size or bigger, sculptured stone human/fish-like heads pecked and chiseled out of sandstone boulders up to 60 cm in height. These sculptures were located on house floors in specific positions. Other boulders of similar size, located in similar p ositions on house floors, were decorated with geometric and/or curvilinear designs, had circular depressions in them, or were undecorated. A total of 82 boulders were found. Srejovic (1972, pp.112-11 6) stresses the uniqueness of these "heads" and the i r interpretation as the final flowering of the Paleolithic tradition of Europe in the Iron Gates. Marshak points out that the curvilinear ornamentations of the backs of some of the representational heads, and the whole of some ornamented boulders, are basically the same as the ornamentations seen at Vlasac and in the Romanian sites and are also evidenced on bone and stone tools at Lepenski Vir. Marshak integrates t�e Lepenski Vir representational fish heads into the rest of the Iron Gates art by his interpretations of the meaning of that ·art as basically connected to water, fish, fish nets, and seasonal symbols (19.81, p.32 ). There is nothing even remotely like the Lepenski Vir heads anywhere else at that time period (Srejovic, 1972, p.114). They are generally accepted as an entirely local development out of a base of much less impressive engraving on stone and bone (largely limited to utilitarian objects). The Lepenski Vir heads share direct historical ° c ontinui ty back to the. terminal Pleistocene sites of the Iron Gates several thousand years earlier. There is, however, a "fairly large boulder" from Odmut, the contemporaneous site in Montenegro, which was coloured.with red ochre (Srejovic, 1975, P• 4). More far-flung connections_ to the Art of the Iron Gates Mesolithic are made and agreed on by most authors. Boroneanf (1969) originally linked this art with that of the Italian Romanellian, specifically the sites of Polesini, Romito, Grotta Maritza and Grimaldi. Letica and Srejovif (1978, p.107) drew attention to the similarity between a piece of flint from Vlasac which has a "net" design -on cortex, and a similar piece from an epi-Gravettian grave in Southern Italy. More generally, Boroneant (1969), Marshak (1981, P• 14) Srejovic (1972) and Srejovic 99
a nd Letica ( 1978) h ave s een t his a rt a s f itting i nto a p an-European t radition d eveloped o ut o f t he P aleolithic a rt o f t he F ranco-Cantabrian he Magdalenian and the s ubsequent Az i1ia n, c oalescing . with t R omanellian , a nd m ade u nique b y t he i nfluence o f t he C entral E uropean E ast-Gravettian. I t i s d ifficult t o i magine what t hese c omparisons a nd p roposed h istorical c onnections m ight mean i n t erms o f c ultures, a nd t he m ovement ( migration?) o f p eoples o r i deas. I t i s worth n oting t hat t he d istance f rom t he F ranco-Cantabrian h eartland o f t he l ate M agdalenian a nd A zilian t o t he I ron G ates i s t he s ame a s t he d istance f rom t he I ron G ates t o S oviet G eorgia . M oldavia , t he K rimea , U kraine , White R ussia , L ithuania, L atvia, P oland, R ussia a nd m ost o f T urkey a re c loser t han t he Pyrenees. I n a ddition , t he Alps l ie b etween t he P yrenees a nd t he I ron Gates, whereas t he Danube p rovides a n atural h ighway b oth North a nd S outh o f t he r elatively o pen a reas o n b oth s hores o f t he B lack S ea . T he f ailure t o c onsider h istorical c onnections t o t he e ast i s p robably l argely d ue t o modern l anguage b arriers, a s well a s t he o bviously g reater a mount o f r esearch d one i n W estern E urope t han a nywhere e lse i n t he w orld. ( See b elow f or f urther d iscussion o f t hese i ssues). R eturning t o t he s econd f ocus o f a ttention i n t he s tudy o f t he a rt o f t he I ron G ates, M arshak a nd o thers h ave b ased t heir i nterpretations o n t he a ssumed h istorical c onnections d iscussed a bove. d iscussed s ymbolic r epresentations a re o f water a nd
Two wellf ish . The
d evelopment f rom h ighly r ealistic t o t otally a bstracted f ish , w hich i s u sed t o a rgue t he i nterpretation o f c ertain g eometric s hapes a s f ish o n V lasac , L epenski V ir , a nd R omanian m aterials, s tarts w ith t he s ite o f L a V ache i n F rance ( Marshak , G ermany ( site o f P eterfels),
1 981, p .19) a nd t ravels a cross E urope f rom t o O lby L yng a nd R yemerksgaard i n D enmark
t o P olesini a nd o ther s ites i n I taly . I t s eems u nrealistic t hat t hese h ighly d iverse a nd g eographically a nd c hronologically r emoved s ites c ould b e s aid t o r epresent t he s ame " culture" e ven i n t he o f t hat t erm . T here i s n o r eason t o s uppose, t herefore ,
l oosest s ense t hat t he s ame
g eometric d ecorations o n materials f rom t wo o f t hese s ites w ill " mean" t he s ame t hing. G iven o ur v ery p oor u nderstanding o f t he E uropean Mesolithic i n t erms o f " culture(s)" , t he s imilarities s een i n a rt s tyles o f f ar-flung s ites c an b e n o m ore m eaningful t han t he o bserved s imilarities b etween t he p yramids o f E gypt a nd Mexico .
1 00
T HE C HIPPED S TONE T he N ature o f T he
c hipped
s tone
m aterial
I NDUSTRY
t he D ata
f rom
V lasac
h ad
b een
s orted
a nd
c lassified b y S rejovi6 a nd L etica ( 1978) b efore t his s tudy b egan . C ores a nd t ools, f ollowing F rench p ractice, were s orted o ut, a nd t he r emainder o f t he a ssemblage, d escribed a s f lint c hipping d ebris a nd c hipped q uartz, was c ounted a nd l eft i n o riginal f ield b ags. T he s orted c ores a nd t ools i ncluded s ome 2 070 p ieces which were d ivided int o the follo wi ng twe nt y-t wo s tratigraphic/cultural " stage" : 1 . 2 . 3 .
p ieces e squillees P er v 3irs B urins
4 . 5 .
R acloir G ratoir c irculaire
6 . 7 . 8 . 9 .
G ratoir u nguiforme G ratoir s ur E clat G ratoir c arene a tipique M icrolithes
1 0. 1. 1 1 2. 1 3.
L ames G rattoir s ur b out d e l ame P ointe a tipique N ucleus
1 4. 1 5.
L ame a e ncoche G rattoir s ur b out d e l ame a tipique
1 6.
S ilikatne S tene -L istoliki nliji
1 7.
categories
sorted
by
( silica s tone r esembling p oints) S ilikatne S tene -lepezaste s trugalice ( silica s tones -f an-like s crapers)
1 8.
S ilikatne S tene -poligonalni s truga n ( silica s tones p olygonal s crapers)
1 9. 2 0. 2 1. 2 2.
q uartz s truga n ( quartz s crapers) q uartz s trugalice ( quartz m icro-scrapers) q uartz i ljci ( quartz p oints) q uartz r eza n ( quartz k nives)
The u nsorted, b agged material i ncluded a pproximately 2 2,000 p ieces . A s t he s orted m aterial p resumably i ncluded a ll o f t he " tools" a nd
r etouched
p ieces,
which
a re
t he
s tandard
s egment
o f
c hipped
s tone
s tudied b y a rcheologists, t his material was c hosen f or t he most d etailed s tudy, i ncluding m icroscopic i nspection f or e vidence o f u se wear . When t he u nsorted material was c ounted a nd s orted, a ny s haped t ools o r r etouched p ieces t hat were f ound were a dded t o t he p rimary d ata s et
f or i ntensive s tudy.
Microscopic s tudy o f t he s orted " tools" p roduced r esults which u pset t he i mplicit a ssumptions u pon which t he s election o f m aterials f or i ntensive a nalysis h ad b een b ased. Many o f t he " tools" h ad n ot b een u sed a t a ll , o r s howed n o e dge d amage i ndicative o f u se . M any o f t he a rtifacts c lassified a s f ormal t ools were i n f act u nretouched f lakes o r b lades which h ad b een u sed c asually i n ways u nrelated t o t he c ategory i nto w hich t hey h ad b een p laced . A v ery l arge p ercentage o f
1 01
u sed a rtifacts were unretouched. R etrospectively, i t w as c lear t hat t he a ppropriate a pproach t o t his m aterial w ould h ave b een a n i ntensive s tudy o f s tratified r andom s amples o f t he t otal a ssemblage . T he l ack o f r elationship b etween t he a rtifacts which h ad b een s orted a nd c lassified a nd t he c ategories i n which t hey w ere p laced , s uggested t he h ypothesis t hat i n f act t he s ample o n which d ata h ad b een c ollected w as r epresentative o f t he material. T o t est t his, o ne 4 x4 metre s quare ( square 5 23) which h ad s everal l evels f or e ach o ccupational s tage was s elected . I ntensive s tudy o f a ll n on-quartz m aterial f rom s quare 5 23, a lthough n ot m icroscopic s tudy , was c arried o ut t o p rovide a b asis c omparison w ith t he r esults o f t he a nalysis o f t he p rimary d ata s et.
o f
A fter s ome e xperiments w ith v iewing q uartz u nder t he m icroscope , i t was d ecided t o l argely i gnore t his material, a nd c oncentrate o n f lint, which i s t he s econd m ost important s tone m aterial a t t he s ite . Most quartz was impossible t o s tudy microscopically a t l ow m agnification without p re-treatment b ecause o f i ts t ranslucency. A t t he t ime t his s tudy was c onducted e xperimental k nowledge a bout t he r elationship b etween e dge d amage a nd u se c ould n ot b e a ssumed t o a pply t o q uartz s ince i t h ad n ot b een u sed i n t hese e xperiments ( but s ee S ussman , 1 985) . T echnological a ttributes, s uch a s t he p resence a nd d imensions o f t he s triking p latform, c ould n ot b e o bserved o n m ost p ieces . T he f ew p ieces f ound amongst t he s orted m aterial w hich w ere p atterned l ike f lint w ere a typical o f t he q uartz. I n s ome c ases, e dge d amage c ould b e s een , s o t hese p ieces were s tudied i ntensively. T he p resence o f t hese p ieces i n t he s orted m aterial was c ertainly n onr andom , a rguing a gainst t he h ypothesis t hat t he s orted a nd c lassified m aterial was r epresentative . B oroneanr ( 1979b , p .42) h as a sserted t hat t he p redominant m ethod o f w orking q uartz was b y s mashing c obbles a nd p icking o ut f ortuitously u sefully s haped p ieces. T hough t his s eems u nlikely , m ost o f t he V lasac q uartz d id l ook a s i f t his m ethod h ad b een u sed. I n t his s ection, e ach o f t he t hree d ata s ets a re d escribed a nd a nalyzed s eparately , b eginning with a n e xplanation o f t he a ttributes which were r ecorded f or e ach . T hen, t he t hree a re c ombined f or a n e xamination
o f
h ow
t he
i nformation
p rovided
b y
e ach
s et
f its
i n
ther t wo. t he . o T o r eiterate, 1 .
t he t hree d ata s ets a re :
D etailed i nformation, i ncluding microscopic s tudy, o n 2 070 r etouched and unretouched p ieces a nd c ores, r epresenting t he o riginal s tudy c ollection s orted b y t he e xcavators.
2 .
D etailed s quare,
3 .
s tudy
o f
a ll
material
f rom
o ne 4 x 4 metre
s quare 5 23.
S ummary i nformation o n a bout 2 2,000 p ieces u nretouched f lakes a nd b lades, a nd c ores.
102
o f
s hatter ,
w ith
D ata S et 1 :
T he P rimary D ata S et
D ESCRIPTION O F A TTRIBUTES T he f ollowing c hipped s tone:
a ttributes
w ere
r ecorded
f or
t he p rimary
s ample
A GE - u sing a k ey p rovided b y t he e xcavator, D r. Z . L etica, t he v ertical a nd h orizontal p rovenience o f e ach a rtifact was i nterpreted a s p art o f O ccupation I , I I, II, I I. D.
I V
-t he
( StarC 'evo),
h orizontal
o r u ndetermined.
( 4
x 4 metre
s quare)
a nd
p rovenience ( natural s tratigraphic l evels w here l evels w ere t oo d eep).
v ertical
o r a rbitrary
MATERIAL -the m aterial o f which t he a rtifact was m ade , a s f ollows: 0 :
c an't t ell
4 :
s iltstone
1 : 2 :
q uartz f lint
5 : 6 :
v olcanics s ilicas
3 :
o bsidian
( For
f urther
c oded
d iscussion
o f
t hese r ock t ypes, e specially v olcanics a nd s ilicas, s ee: " Bedrock Geology a nd L ithic R esources",
a bove).
B ULB -p resence o r a bsence o f a b ulb o f p ercussion. P LATFORM -p resence o r a bsence o f a s triking p latform. T RUNCATED -presence o r a bsence o f a t runcation o f t he d istal e nd o f t he a rtifact. D ELIBERATE -deliberate ,
o r n ot d eliberate ,
t runcation o f
t he
d istal e nd. C ORTEX -p resence o r a bsence o f c ortex. H EATED -e vidence o f h eat t reatment: n one; s palls; c racking a nd d iscoloration.
g lossy;
h eat
L IP - p resence o r a bsence o f a l ip o n t he s triking p latform. P LATFORM C RUSHING -p resence o r a bsence o f a brading o f t he e dge o f t he s triking p latform, a s i n p reparation f or k napping. PLATFORM F ACETS -n umber o f r etouch s cars o r f acets o n t he s triking p latform , c ode
o f
z ero
a s
h ere
i n p reparation f or k napping . i ndicates
e ntirely b y c ortex.
1 03
a
p latform
A
c overed
o f
NUMBER O F
S URFACES
a rtifact . 3 o r 4 .
f aces,
o n a n
F lakes a nd b lades would h ave 2 f aces,
-T he
n umber
o f
s urfaces,
o r
c ores
NUMBER OF R EMOVALS -T he n umber o f n egative r emoval s cars c ounted o n t he e xterior f ace o f
t he a rtifact.
C UTTING EDGE ANGLE R IGHT -T he a ngle o f t he c utting e dge o n t he r ight e dge ( with p latform u p,
v entral s urface u p) ,
a t t he midpoint o f t hat e dge, o r a s c lose t o t hat p oint a s p ossible, while a voiding m easuring a h ighly i rregular p oint. C UTTING E DGE A NGLE L EFT -T he a ngle o f P LATFORM L ENGTH -M aximum l ength o f P LATFORM W IDTH -M aximum w idth o f T HICKNESS
-M aximum t hickness
C URVE/TWIST -D oes
t he l eft
c utting e dge.
t he s triking p latform.
t he
s triking p latform.
o f a rtifact.
t he a rtifact
c urve b ack t owards t he d orsal
f ace a t t he d istal e nd? I s i t t wisted o ut o f a two d imensional p lane? Are b oth c urving a nd twisting p resent? P OLAR COORDINATES t ransparent t racing,
-E ach p olar
with
artifact
c oordinate
t he
p oint
was
t raced,
g rid was
o f
impact
p laced
o f
t hen t aken e very 1 0 d egrees, e ach
a rtifact,
s imultaneously .
d egree
i ts
i ntervals
t he b asis o f a t rial s ample a t 2 0 i ntervals.
o rigin a t t he A r eading was
t o p roduce 3 6 d ata p oints
e xpressing
T en
a
t he
t he p ercussor
l ocated o n t he 1 80 ° r adian, a nd t he approximate c enter o f t he a rtifact. f or
t hen o ver
R eadings e very 2 0
°
s ize
a nd
were
s hape
c hosen
o n
i ntervals a nd 1 0
°
p roduced a v ery r ough
°
a pproximation o f t he e dge, with much l oss o f d etail. T en d egree r eadings p roduced g ood a pproximations t o t he a ctual a rtifact U SE
1 -T he
e dge
o f
s hape.
e very
a rtifact
was
e xamined
with
a
m icroscope a nd c haracterized a ccording t o i ts e vidence o f u se o r o ther b roken;
C ORTEX
f eatures
p latform;
n o
p recluding u se :
u se;
v ery
s harp
c an 't b ut
u sed; v ery s harp t o s harp, b ut c learly u sed ; s harp t o d ull ; d ull ;
u sed; s harp, b ut p olished ; p olished
a nd v ery s harp;
p olished a nd d ull;
1 -O n
t he
p olished a nd s harp;
g iven
s egment
o f
e dge
u se i n t he p receding a ttribute,
c haracterized b y
1 -O n t he
s ame
e dge s egment,
1 04
i s
t he
i s c ortex p resent o r
a bsent? R ETOUCH
t ell;
p robably
t here r etouch?
R ETOUCH L OCATION 1 -I s o n b oth f aces? F LAKE
t he r etouch o n t he d orsal,
v entral o r
1 -A re t here f lakes knocked o ff t his e dge s egment w hich d o n ot s eem t o b e r elated t o a ny r etouch?
F LAKE EDGES
1 -A re t he t erminations o f t hese f lakes o n t he
s urface
o f
t he
a rtifact
s harp
a nd
c lear ,
i ll-defined
o r r ounded o ff? Or a re t here f lakes which a re c lear a nd o thers w hich a re r ounded? F LAKE L OCATION 1 -A re t hese f lakes v entral, o r b oth f aces? S TEP S CARS 1 -A re s egment? LOCATION S TEP
t here
S CARS
d orsal,
s tep
1 -A re
r emoved
s cars
t he
f rom
p resent
s tep
s cars
t he
o n
d orsal,
t his
e dge
l ocated o n t he
v entral o r b oth f aces?
P OLAR C OORDINATE AREA 1 A -T he p olar c oordinate a rea i n which t he e dge c haracterized a bove b egins. P OLAR C OORDINATE AREA
1 B -T he p olar c oordinate a rea i n which
t he e dge c haracterized a bove e nds. The p receding e leven a ttributes were r epeated a s many t imes a s n ecessary t o c ompletely c haracterize t he e dge o f e ach a rtifact.
M ETHODOLOGY O F C LASSIFICATION T he h ierarchical c lassification o f b elow,
t he p rimary d ata s et,
was r eached i n t he f ollowing f ashion .
a ccording
t o
c ores
c ore
a nd
t he
o ccupational
f ragments
were
l evel
t o
w hich
s eparated
p resented
T he a rtifacts were s orted
o ut
t hey a nd
b elonged .
S econdly ,
d escribed .
T hey
were
a lso e xamined m icroscopically a nd e vidence o f u se s ubsequent t o s ervice a s c ores was s eparately n oted and d escribed. s tone
was
t hen
s orted
o n t he
f ollowing c ategories :
b asis
u nused;
o f
The r emaining c hipped
m icroscopic e xamination i nto t he
p robably u sed;
u sed;
p robably r etouched,
--- 1 unused; probably r etouched, p robably u sed; probably r et ,
1
r etouched, unused; r etouched, p robably u sed; r etouched, u sed; t ools,
s haped
b y
r etouch .
T hese
c ategories
t o t echnological c haracteristics: f lake/blades
w ere
s hatter;
t hen
s orted
p robable
f ormal
a ccording
f lakes;
f lakes;
[ Flake/blades h ave l ongitudinal r idges a nd p arallel t o
s ubparallel l ateral s ides, b ut a re n ot a t l east twice a s l ong a s t hey a re
wide];
b lades.
s haped b y r etouch , t hey
were
f ew,
A rtifacts
i n
t he
a nd
t heir
o n
t he
a ttributes, r etouched
b asis
o f
p roduced b lades,
u se,
and
c ategories
e tc.
u se
Within
s uch
o n
a s :
t hey
h ad
and
whether
t he
b asis
u nused
c ategories u se
1 05
t ools,
o f
d amage
s orting
t echnological
s hatter ;
u sed
where u se was was
a s
f requently
T he c ombination o f t he
a rtifacts were g rouped a ccording t o h ow many d ifferent e dge
f ormal
a ttributes were
r etouch . t hen
c ategory :
i llustrated a nd d escribed ,
t echnological
o bscured o r d estroyed b y e xtensive f irst
l ast
h ave b een i ndividually
s ections
l imited
t o
f lakes;
o bserved, o f u sed
t he
e dge
I tself, o r i nvolved t he d orsal o r v entral o r b oth d orsal a nd v entral f aces o f t he t ool . T ools w ith u se d amage w hich was l imited t o e ither d orsal o r v entral ( unilateral) f aces, o r t o b ilateral d amage, a re c alled h ere s imple t ools , t he implicit a ssumption b eing t hat t hey w ere u sed f or o nly o ne m ode ( cutting o r s craping) o f w ork . T ools w ith p art o f t heir e dges u nilaterally d amaged, a nd o ther p arts b ilaterally d amaged , a re c alled c omplex t ools i n t hat t hey a ppear t o h ave b een u sed i n a t l east t wo d istinct w ays. B efore p roceeding t o t he r esults o f t he d escriptive a nalysis o f t he p rimary d ata s et, a r eview o f t he s tate o f u se w ear a nalysis s eems c alled f or, a s t his a pproach i s n ot u niversally u sed, u nderstood, o r v alued. U SE W EAR A NALYSIS A s Tringham e t a l ( 1974) h ave p ointed o ut, i nterest i n t he s tudy o f u se wear i s n ot n ew a nd, i n f act, e xtends b ack t o t he m id-19th c entury , when a n a ssortment o f p ublications d ealing w ith u se w ear o n s tone t ools a ppeared . T he m ost r ecent wave o f i nterest among E uropean and American p rehistorians d ates t o 1 964, t he y ear S emenov's P rehistoric T echnology w as p ublished i n English . I n t hat v olume t he r esults o f y ears o f e xperiments a nd s tudy o f p rehistoric s tone t ools were p resented . S emenov h ad f ound r egular r elationships b etween t he m ode o f u se o f t he t ool ( scraping , c utting , e tc .) , t he k ind o f m aterial t he t ool was u sed o n ( meat, b one, wood, e tc.) a nd t he e dge d amage a nd s cratches m icroscopically v isible. I n a l ater p ublication ( 1970), S emenov c larified e arlier s tatements a bout u se a nd u se wear b y s pecifying t hat m any t ools o n which o ne c annot s ee m icro-scopic u sewear were p robably u sed, a nd t hat, a s a n e xample o f t his, N eolithic t ools m ore o ften h ad s triations t han P aleolithic o nes . R elationships b etween t he l ocation a nd d irection o f m icro-striations a nd t he u se m ade o f t he t ool were a lso r eported a s b eing q uite s traightforward, when t hey
c ould
b e
s een .
D rilling ,
f or
a t a r ight a ngle t o t he a xis o f s traight s cratches p arallel t o
e xample , t he t he
l eaves
d rill, t ool's
c ircular
while a xis.
s cratches
p iercing S awing
l eaves l eaves
b ilateral s cratches p arallel t o t he e dge a nd , m eat k nives h ave b ilateral, p arallel a nd d iagonal s cratches. Whittling p roduces unilateral s cratches p erpendicular t o t he e dge ( ibid p . 7 -8). A n i nteresting o bservation made b y S emenov , a nd a lso f ound i n t his a nalysis, i s t hat s ome f ormal b urins w ere n ot u sed a s b urins, a lthough o thers w ere
( ibid,
p .5).
F urther r esults o f u se wear e xperiments a nd a ttempts t o a nalyze s tone t ool a ssemblages i n t erms o f u se-wear b egan t o t rickle i n a fter 1 964. K eller ( 1966) p ointed t o t he s pecific m aterial f rom which t he a rtifact was m ade , a nd t o t he c ross-section o f t he c utting e dge , a s t wo a dditional
f actors
i nfluencing
t he
f ormation
o f
e dge
d amage
f rom
u se .
H ester e t a l ( 1973) l ater a rgued, without p resenting t he d etails o f t heir w ork , t hat q uartzite s crapers s tay s harp m uch l onger t han c hert s crapers, e xplaining a p reference f or q uartzite e ven t hough i t i s h arder t o work. K eller ( 1966) a lso s uggested t hat s ince s crapers l asted l onger t han c utting t ools
i n e xperimental s ituations ,
a s craping
t ool f ound i n t he a rcheological r ecord e qualed m ore s craping w ork t han a c utting t ool . F inally , t he f irst o f a l ong s equence o f c ontradictory
1 06
r esults,
K eller r eported
t hat
c arving o r
p aring h ard w ood p roduced b i-
f acial d amage , whereas S emenov h ad f ound a brasions o n o f t he c utting e dge o nly ( Semenov , 1 964, p .109).
t he
v entral
f ace
MacDonald a nd S anger ( 1968) r eported t hat m icroscopic wear t races c ould n ot b e s een o n c halcedony , a nd s uggested t hat t his m aterial w as t oo h ard f or t he f ormation o f s uch t races t o o ccur . D onnan a nd Moseley ( 1968) r eported t hat t hin p rimary f lakes w ere i deal f or b ut d id n ot r eport h ow t hey u sed t he f lakes, o r what,
s caling f ish , i f a ny, e dge
d amage d eveloped . This i s c ertainly a u se f or c hipped s tone which would b e expected t o h ave o ccurred i n t he I ron G ates. C rabtree a nd D avis ( 1968) e xperimented with m aking i mplements o f h ard a nd s oft w ood with s tone t ools - a nother u se r elevant t o t he I ron G ates, a nd p robably v irtually a ll s tone a ge a ssemblages. u nifacial c hoppers a re m ore e ffective t han b ifaces t hat w orking w ood q uickly F rison
( 1968)
T hey r eported t hat f or woodworking , a nd
c onsumes s tone t ools.
made
s ome
v ery
i nciteful
o bservations
a bout
f unctional a nalysis. H e i nitially p ointed o ut t hat t he m otor h abits n ecessary f or u sing s tone and metal t ools a re d ifferent, a nd t hat a ttempts t o s tudy u se d amage b y p roducing i t e xperimentally i n t he l aboratory s hould c onsider t his a s a c onfounding v ariable,(see a lso Vaughan , 1 985, p .15). H e t hen p resented a s tudy o f t he e ffects o f r esharpening o n t he a ppearance o f f unctionally i dentical t ools a nd c oncluded t hat t ools were c onsistently d ulled t o t he s ame p oint, r esharpened and t hen a bandoned when t hey r eached a c ertain r educed s ize. A t v arious p oints o n t his p ath, t ools l ooked q uite d ifferent. T he h istory o f t ools c an b e t raced t hrough t heir r esharpening f lakes . I n a n e xcavation w here n o s ieving i s d one , t he r ecovery o f r esharpening f lakes, o r a ny v ery small d ebris i s r are, s o t hat t his i dea c annot b e a pplied t o t he m aterial i n q uestion . Allen ( 1970) m ade o ne o f t he e arliest a ttempts t o u se m icrowear a nalysis r esults a s t he b asis f or a c ritical e xamination o f a morphologically b ased t ypology. He f irst d id an " intuitive" c lassification o f p rojectile p oints, t hen s ubjected i t t o a n a ttribute b ased m ulti-variate s tatistical a nalysis a nd f ound t hat t he i ntuitive t ypology was n ot u pheld. Microscopic s tudy f urther c onfused t he p icture. S ome t ypologically s imilar p oints b elonged t o d ifferent f unctional c lasses , b ut o ther t ypologically g rouped p oints b elonged t o t he s ame f unctional c lasses. T he f unctional i nterpretations which A llen made were b ased o n e xperiments h e p erformed p rior t o t he a nalysis. g rounds
T hese
b y K eeley
Nance
( 1971)
e xperiments were
l ater c riticized o n m ethodological
( 1980). e xamined
1 0
o bsidian S tockton
p oints,
a nd
f ound
a ttrition f lakes a nd s triations, b oth p arallel a nd p erpendicular t o t he e dge, which h e i nterpreted a s wear r esulting f rom u se i n c utting a nd whittling . H ester a nd H eizer ( 1973) a ssailed N ance 's r esult , r eporting t hat o f 8 7 p oints t hey e xamined n o w ear t races a t a ll w ere f ound o n 6 4, a nd 3 h ad b een f ound i mbedded i n h uman b ones , d ocumenting t heir u se a s p rojectile
p oints.
H ester
a nd H eizer
d id
n ot
r eport
what
t races
t hey
d id s ee o n t he 2 3 p oints which h ad t hem , o r a ny d etails o f m ethodology ( including magnification) which c ould p rovide t he f ramework f or a m eaningful c omparison with N ance's r esults. K eeley ( 1974) s uggested
1 07
t hat t he s triations o bserved b y N ance w ere p roduced b y " scrubbing" o f t he e dge i n p reparation f or r etouch . More i mportantly K eeley a rgued t hat i nterpretation o f u se w ear t races s hould b e d one i n t he c ontext o f a s m any o ther k inds o f i nformation a s p ossible , s uch a s : t he c ontext o f t he s ite , i nformation f rom e thnographic a nalogy, a nd e xperimentation with s tone t ool m anufacture a nd u se . S heets ( 1973) h ad a lso p reviously r eported t he p ossibility o f m isinterpreting e dge d amage p roduced d uring p reparation f or r etouch. G ould,
Koster a nd S ontz
( 1971) e xplored o ne o f
t hese a ngles
i n
e xamining A ustralian A borigine u se o f c hipped s tone . Western D esert a borigines h ave a 2 c lass c lassification o f t ools which i s b asically f unctional : 1 ) t hick f lakes which h ave s teep e dges g ood f or t he a dzing a nd s craping o f w ood , a nd 2 ) t hin s harp e dged f lakes, g ood f or c utting a nd s licing. T he mean e dge a ngle f or 1 ) was 6 7.0 ° a nd f or 2 ) 3 9.52 ° . This c lassification i s c onsonant w ith W ilmsen 's g uess a bout t ool f unctions. Wilmsen ( 1968) d iscovered a b imodal
c oncentrated o n e dge a ngle a nd f unction, d istribution i n a n a rcheological c ollection .
a nd H e
t hen w ent o n , n ot v ery u sefully, t o g uess w hat t he r elationship b etween e dge a ngle a nd f unction might b e. Wylie ( 1975, p .23) f ound a v ery l arge o verlap o f e dge a ngle d istributions f or h is f ive f unctional g roups o f t ools f or H ogup c ave e stablished b y m icroscopic a nalysis o f e dge
d amage,
a nd
a v ery b road d istribution o f
e dge a ngle with e ach
g roup , which l ed h im t o q uestion t he m eaningfulness o f e dge a ngles f or f unctional i nterpretation. Hayden ( 1979b) r emeasured t he a rtifacts s tudied b y Wilmsen a nd g ot a mean v alue 1 7.4 ° h igher t han Wilmsen 's. E dge a ngle h as a lso b een e xamined e xperimentally b y C rabtree ( 1973b) . an b e u sed t o work C rabtree f ound t hat o btuse e dge a ngles o f 9 0-130 ° c v ery h ard m aterials s uch a s d ry b one ( which K eeley ( 1977) d escribes a s u nworkable) which would q uickly d ull o r b reak a n a cute e dge. Acute a ngle t ools w ill c ut s ofter m aterials, w hich a re a ll t hat G ould e t a l r eport
f or
t he A borigines .
G ould , K oster a nd S ontz ( 1971, p p .160, c asual u se a nd d iscarding o f " rocks" ,
1 63) a nd
a lso o bserved f requent f lake p roduction b y
" smashing" n odules w ith r ocks a nd t hen s electing a s f ew a s 1 o ut o f 2 00 o f t he r esultant f lakes. This k ind o f c asual p roduction and u tilization i s c ertainly e videnced a s o ne c omponent o f b ehavior s urrounding s tone t ool u se a t V lasac . D esirable f lakes, o n t he o ther h and, were r egularly r etouched-which was a lso t rue a t V lasac. D ifferent r aw m aterials were v alued b y i ndividual u sers o n t he b asis o f t heir t otemic a ttachments -- p eople wanted r aw m aterials f rom t heir t otemic a reas--a c hoice r eflected b y t he c olors o f m aterial . C olor i s echnologically m eaningless ( see , h owever , C rabtree, 1 967a) o f course t a nd h as l ong b een i gnored a s a v ariable f or t hat r eason . I ts p otential u se a s a s ocial m arker p oints t o f or p atterning i n a ny a ssemblage . f requency o f d ifferent c olors o f
t he v alue o f e xamining t his v ariable O sborne ( 1965 , p .35) f ound t hat t he s tone v aried t hru t ime a t W etherill
M esa. G ould, m icroscopic c ompared
K oster a nd S ontz a lso r eported e dge d amage c aused b y working wood
t hese
t races,
a nd
t he
e dge
1 08
a ngles
o f
so me
( 1971, t he
o bservations o f p .159 , 1 66) a nd p
e dges
o n w hich
t hey
o ccurred,
t o m iddle P aleolithic Quina s crapers.
H ayden a nd K aminga
( 1973a) l ater q uestioned t he d ependability o f t hese r esults o n m ethodological g rounds, c alling a ttention t o t he i mpreciseness o f t heir c lassification o f k inds o f e dge d amage, f ailure t o a ccount f or v ariables s uch a s b ag wear, a nd t he k ind o f wood e dges w ere u sed o n, e tc . I n t heir r ejoinder t o G ould 's r ejoinder ( Gould , 1 973) , H ayden a nd K aminga
( 1973b) a cknowledge s ome o f
t he s hortcomings
a nd e nd b y c alling f or a c onference o n u se-wear ,
i n t heir o wn w ork
" with t he o bjective o f
d etermining m eaningful d efinitions a nd p rocedures ." T his c onference . . u ltimately t ook p lace a nd t he p apers a nd d iscussion w ere p ublished i n 1 979 ( B. H ayden, e d., 1 979). A s econd e thnographic s tudy, c arried o ut b y H ayden ( 1979a) o n A ustralian A borigine s tone t ool u se , d ocumented t he u se o f d enticulates a nd n otches a s w ood s having t ools, a nd r eported t hat t he v ast m ajority o f f lakes u sed a s h and-held t ools were u nretouched a nd t hat e dge modification was p rimarily t o g et r id o f e dge i rregularities o r t o r esharpen . t he V lasac
T hese o bservations p roved t o b e o f p articular r elevance t o m aterial . A t hird e thnographic s tudy , d one i n N ew G uinea,
p roduced r esults n ot p articularly c omparable t o t he p revious t wo ( White a nd Thomas, 1 972). I n t his s tudy, p eople m ade n o u se o f r etouch a nd d id n ot d istinguish l inguistically b etween c ores a nd f lakes. T ools were s elected which h ad s uitable e dges, a nd o ne a rtifact c ould b e u sed f or m ore t han o ne t ask i f i t h ad s everal s uitable e dges . I ndividuals h ad
t heir
o wn
c lassification
o f
s tone
t ools
b ased
o n
e dge
m orphology ,
s ize, a nd n on-functional v ariables, a nd t hese c lassifications more-or-less s hared b y p eople who l ived i n t he s ame v illage.
were T he
a uthors s uggest, o n t he b asis o f t hese r esults, t hat t he u sed e dge, r ather t han t he a rtifact, i s t he a ppropriate u nit o f a nalysis i n s tone t ool s tudies. B efore t he c onference r eferred t o a bove t ook p lace, a n umber o f o ther a ttempts t o d evelop u se wear a nalysis were m ade . T ringham e t a l p ublished
t he
r esults
o f
e xtensive
e xperimentation
( 1974) .
U sing
l ow
m agnification ( less t han 1 00x) t he a uthors s tudied t he d evelopment o f m icro-flake d amage t o e dges, a rguing t hat i t was a s s ensitive t o c hanges i n t he material worked a nd t he a ction ( scraping, c utting, e tc.) a s were t he s triations a nd p olishes o nly v isible a t h igher m agnification . H ard m aterials -bone , a ntler , a nd h ardwoods -produced s tep s cars, a nd s oft m aterials o nly s imple ( scalar) f lake d amage . W ood working a braded t he e dges o f d amage f lakes. T he s imple mechanical r elationship b etween t he m ode o f u tilization ( scraping , c utting , e tc .) a nd t he l ocation o f e dge d amage n oted b y s everal a uthors w as a lso n oted b y T ringham e t a l. T hey c onclude b y a rguing t hat t he m ost i mportant i ssue i n m icrowear a nalysis i s b eing a ble t o i dentify t he e xact a rea o f u tilization o f t he e dge i n o rder t o r elate t hat t o t he m acromorphology o f t he t ool-ie., t o u se i n s tudying t he r elation b etween f orm a nd f unction . Wylie ( 1975) i ndependently r eported t he s ame r esults o n t he l ocation a nd c haracter o f e dge d amage e xcept f or h is f ailure t o f ind s tep s cars c aused b y c utting h ard m aterial. K eeley ( 1980, p .51) r eports t he f ormation o f s tep s cars i n h ide s craping, which i s n ot r eported b y o thers, b ut o therwise a lso c oncurs w ith t he r esults o f o ther i nvestigators . L awrence ( 1979) h as c oncurred w ith a nd f urther r efined t hese r esults b y a dding t he t hickness o f t he w ork e dge a s
a s ignificant
v ariable .
1 09
In 1 974, 1 977, a nd 1 978 K eeley p ublished r eviews o f p rogress i n m icrowear s tudies. H e c riticized t he u se o f l ow magnification , c laiming t hat c ritical d etails a re l ost i n t his w ay , a nd a ttacked t he weak
m ethodology
o f
e xperimental
s tudies
( they d on 't
p rove
t he k ind
o f
u se-only s how t hat s uch a n i nterpretation i s p ossible) a nd t he f ailure t o c ontrol f or t he m aterials f rom which t ools a re m ade , a nd u rged t he c onsideration o f s ite s pecific v ariables s uch a s c limate , i n s tone t ool s tudies. K eeley c laims t o b e a ble t o d istinguish u se o n wood, b one, meat, a nd h ide a nd materials a s h ard o r h arder t han f lint w ith m agnifications b etween 1 00x-200x ( Newcomer a nd K eeley , 1 979) . V aughan ( 1985) h as a lso a rgued t hat l ow m agnification r esults a re m uch m ore s ubject t o d istortion b y e xtraneous v ariables s uch a s b ag wear, a nd p articular c haracteristics o f t he s tone, s uch a s g rain s ize, t han a re h igh m agnification r esults . D ifferent m ethods o f t ool m anufacture m ay a lso c ause e dge d amage which c an b e m istaken f or u se w ith l ow magnification ( Plew a nd Woods, 1 985) . O dell ( 1975) r esponded, i n d efense o f l ow magnification work,
t hat s triations s ometimes n ever
d evelop o n u sed t ools a nd w ent o n t o r eiterate p revious r eports o f t he k inds o f e vidence o btainable w ith l ow m agnification . R esults o f o ther r esearchers u sing h igh magnification h ave n ot K eeley's r esults ( Büller , 1 983). L ynott
( 1975)
s tudied
m icrowear
p roduced
a lways
b y
g raving
c orroborated
a nd
d rilling
a nd f ound t hat i n d rilling t he t ip i tself w as f requently u ndamaged , o r i t d eveloped p olish . T he v entral e dges n ear t he t ip f laked a nd p olish d eveloped o n t he d orsal median r idges. N o d ifferences i n wear were o bserved b etween d rilling l eather, wood a nd b one. G raving p roduced p olish o n t he v entral s urface , i nverse e dge f laking a t t he t ip a nd s tep s carring a nd g rinding o f t he d orsal s urface a t t he t ip. Hayden's ( 1979b) s tudy o f s kin s crapers p ointed o ut t he " pronounced r ounding o f e dge p rominences a nd u sually e dge a rcs" , i ndicative o f t he working o f a s emi-plastic m aterial . H e a lso o bserved a lmost n o v entral a brasion, a nd a r ange o f e dge a ngles f rom 5 5-100 d egrees
( mean = 7 6.40).
C entral c oncerns i n m icrowear a nalysis c urrently i nclude t he l ow m agnification -h igh m agnification d ebate ( Odell , 1 983) , t he n eed f or r efinement o f s tudy m ethodology ( including d evelopment o f a c onsistent, u niversally a ccepted, t erminology), a nd t he n eed t o u nderstand t he r elationships b etween macro-morphology, o r f orm, a nd f unction ( Schiffer, m inor
1 979).
i mportance
S chiffer i n
t he
u se
( ibid p .20) f eels
t hat
o f u nretouched f lakes.
s hape o ften i s
o f
H ayden a nd K aminga
f eel ( 1979, p .5) t hat while t here i s n o o ne t o o ne r elationship , t here i s a c orrelation b etween f orm a nd f unction ( see a lso V aughan, 1 985, p .100 ; M oss, 1 983) . O thers h ave f ound i nconsistent o r n o r elationship b etween f orm a nd f unction ( Büller, 1 983). K eeley ( 1980, p .112) r eports a n empirically o bserved ( used
f lakes
a re
McConaughy
c orrelation b etween
b igger) a nd
b etween s pecific
( 1978)
p ointed
h as
o ut
f lake
s ize a nd u se
s izes a nd s pecific u ses .
t hat
i n
S emenov 's
o riginal
( 1964) v olume m ost o f t he p hotographs a re a t l ow m agnification , o nly 5 p ictures o ut o f 1 89 a re a t m agnifications g reater t han 1 00 , a nd 1 74 a re a t
5 0x o r l ess.
And y et i t i s t o S emenov t hat o ne c an t race b ack t he
i nsistence o n t he n eed f or h igh magnification .
1 10
Ahler ( 1979) r eports
experimental results relevant to the magnification controversy: Pronounced use w ear is visible with the naked eye, moderate w ear is detectable at !Ox, light wear at 35-70x and if no wear can be seen at 70x it is safe to assume that there is no use wear on the edge. Keeley's reported ability to identify use in a blind experiment (Newcomer and Keeley, 1979) is i mpressive, and depends on the use of high magni fication (over lOOx). These results, however, have been questioned (Holley and Del Bene, 1981). With lower magnifications (80 or less), one is not likely to miss use wear altogether, but less likely to be able to identi fy it with the surety and precision which Keeley had achieved. High magnification is much more time consuming and requires more expensive equipment. Whether it is worth the higher i nformation return depends on the goals of the research being done (assuming that choosing the more time consuming and expensive route is an available choice at all) . In this study, high magnification was not an available option. Low magnification analysis (up to lOOx) was used to produce a picture of the varying kinds and frequencies of edge damage. These results can then be examined against other direct and indirect evidence for stone t ool use from the site. A final future step mi ght be the testi ng of i nterpretations by high magnification study of a sample of these artifacts . DESCRIPTIVE CLASSIFICATION OF ARTIFACTS The descriptive classification of the chipped stone in the primary data set is presented here, occupational stage by stage, starting with the first occupation of the site, Vlasac I. Following the description and discussion of all stages i ndividually is a comparison of the different stages and discussion of the site as a whole. Vlasac I Cores and Core Fragments (137) . The primary data set contained 18 whole cores and 7 core fragments attributable to Vlasac I. Five of the 7 flint core fragments were struck flakes with bulbs of percussion which had carried an end of the One of these was used inversely as a scraper core with them. (indicated by unilateral edge -damage) until quite dulled and covered with step scars. The other 4 struck flake/core fragments were not used after being struck. One_ of the other two core fragments had also been used as a scraper on two edges. The sizes of these fragments suggest that the parent cores were approaching the mini mum size of ·a worked core for efficient, well-controlled knapping. One fragment is actually a flake �hich detached a striking plat form , - a core rejuvenation flake. Comparison of the dimen�ions of the core fragments with whole cores shows that they are as small as the smaller range of whole cores, suggesti ng that these fragments broke off because the cores were getti ng too small to work with much control. Both flakes and blades were. detached f ro m 4 core fragment s, and b 1 ades on 1 y from the f if t h. The plan view of the 5 unused core fragments is rectangular to square. One of the eighteen whole cores is limestone; two are quartz and 111
t he r est a re f lint. One c ore i s c hisel-ended, a nd f ive h ave p ointed, k eel-shaped e nds . N ine f lint c ores a re m ore amorphous, l arger , o ften h ave t races o f t he p roduction o f f lakes, b ut n ot b lades, a nd a re more l ikely t o b ear r emnants o f c ortex t han t he r emaining 6 . T he d ata s uggest t hat c ores were i nitially b eing worked f or f lakes i n a h aphazard f ashion . A fter s ignificant r eduction , s ome w ere t hen worked f urther, b lades.
i n a more s ystematic a nd r egular way, f or t he p roduction o f
O nly o ne a dditional f lint c ore , a nd o ne f lint c ore f ragment w ere f ound I n s quare 5 23 i n t he V lasac I l evels . T he c ore h ad c ortex o n i t, was a f lake c ore with o ne p latform, a nd 6 f lake s car r emovals. T he c ore f ragment was t he d istal e nd o f a k eel-ended b lade c ore, with n o c ortex. I n t he unsorted
b agged
r emainder
o f
t he V lasac
c hipped s tone,
t here were s eventeen c ores d efinitely a ssociated with V lasac I . T hirteen o f t hese w ere f lake c ores, t hree w ere b lade c ores, a nd o ne h ad b oth f lake a nd b lade r emovals. T he l ast , f lake/blade , c ore h ad c ortex o n i t. F ive o f t he t hirteen f lake c ores a lso h ad c ortex o n t hem . T wo m ore c ores h ad c ortex o n t hem a lso ,
b ut
t he d ata
r ecording
s ystem
d oes
n ot d ifferentiate i n t hese t wo c ases b etween f lake a nd b lade c ores. T here were a lso 9 4 c ore f ragments a ssociated with V lasac I . This b rings t he g rand t otal d efinitely a ssociated w ith V lasac I t o 3 6 c ores a nd 1 01 c ore f ragments . A ssuming t hat t wo c ore f ragments r epresent , o n a verage , o ne d istinct c ore , t his w ould g ive a r atio o f c ores t o f lakes, b lades, f lake-blade f ragments, a nd c ore r ejuvenation f lakes o f 1 :18 which i s c ompatible with i n s itu knapping o f c ores f rom t he p oint o f i nitial p reparation. U nretouched, T he
U sed F lakes
u nretouched,
( 137)
u sed
f lakes
f rom V lasac
I c onsisted
o f:
5 3
4 f lakes u sed o nly f or c utting, 4 u sed o nly f or s craping, 2 f or d rilling, 6 f or r eaming, o ne a s a wedge, a nd 3 1 c omplex t ools u sed i n a t l east two p laces f or b oth c utting a nd s craping o r d rilling a nd c utting a nd/or s craping. U nretouched,
U sed B lades
( 46)
T he 4 6 unretouched u sed b lades f rom V lasac I c onsisted o f: 1 8 u sed o nly f or c utting, 1 4 u sed o nly f or s craping, 1 f or d rilling, a nd 1 3 c omplex t ools u sed i n a t l east t wo s ections o f t he e dge f or a c ombination o f c utting a nd s craping. U nretouched,
U sed F lake/Blades
( 28)
T he f lake/blades which w ere u nretouched i ncluded 1 2 u sed o nly f or c utting a nd 7 u sed o nly f or s craping . O ne o f t he t wo c omplex t ools w as u sed a s a d rill a nd f or c utting . e dge r ounding o n o ne e dge w ithout
T wo o ther f lake/blades h ad a ny f lake r emovals .
1 12
d istinct
R etouched,
U sed,
S haped T ools
( 24)
Twenty-four p ieces f rom V lasac I h ave b een c lassified h ere a s f ormally s haped t ools . O nly a f ew o f t hese a re c lassical g eometrics . S ince
s o
m uch
a ttention a nd
i mportance h as
i n t raditional r esearch i n E urope , a nd i llustrated s eparately.
e ach o ne
b een g iven o f
t hese
t o
f ormal
w ill
b e
t ools
d escribed
No. 2 34 ( Figure 8 a). B lade w ith p latform a nd b ulb d eliberately t rimmed o ff; t op r etouch a nd s tep s cars o n p roximal a nd d istal e nd a nd t op r etouch a nd s tep s cars c overing u pper o ne-half o f r ight l ateral e dge . L eft l ateral e dge h as b ilateral f lakes k nocked o ff a nd s ome e dge d ulling. N o .
2 77
( Figure
8 b) .
U nmodified
p latform
e dge b ilaterally f lake d amaged a nd u sed ; s tep s cars; d istal u nused ; m icroblade.
l eft
p resent, l ateral
r ight
t op
l ateral
r etouch
a nd
No. 1 869 ( Figure 8 c). P latform i ntact; whole r ight l ateral e dge u nilaterally r etouched , s tep s carred a nd d ull ; l ower l eft l ateral e dge p ossibly i nversely r etouched , s lightly p olished , e dge f resh ; m iddle a nd u pper l eft l ateral e dge b ilaterally f laked, e dge f resh; G rave 7 2. No. 2 80 ( Figure 8 d). P roximal e nd b roken o ff, d istal ; b oth l ateral e dges unilaterally r etouched ( edge a ngle = 5 5 °) b ilateral f lake r emovals a nd a re d ulled. No. 2 95 ( Figure 8 e). r etouch) , t races.
e nd h ave
P latform a nd b ulb r etouched away ( inverse
r etouch e xtends d own m ost o f
r ight l ateral e dge ;
n o c lear u se
No. 3 07 ( Figure 8 0. D istal a nd p roximal e nds r emoved a nd r etouched o n t op f ace, e dge o f r etouch a ppears p olished; t he d ulled l eft l ateral e dge h as b ilateral f lake r emovals with r ounded e dges; nd 7 5 °. a ngles o f r etouched e dges a re 7 0° a N o. 3 08 ( Figure 8 g). Moderately d ulled p roximal a nd d istal e nds s haped with t op r etouch a nd c overed with t op f lake r emovals with r ounded e dges; t he m oderately d ull r ight l ateral e dge h as a lternately t op ( upper 1 /2) a nd i nverse ( lower 1 /2) f lake r emovals with r ounded e dges; t he m oderately d ull l eft l ateral e dge h as b ilateral s harp-edged f lake r emovals. No. 3 30 ( Figure 8 h). Two s ides a re b roken, i mpossible t o t ell i f t his was d eliberate -a nd t here i s n o e vidence o f s ubsequent d amage; t op r etouched e dge i s m oderately
d ulled.
N o . 3 35 ( Figure 8 j) . U nmodified p latform w ith b ulb f orms o ne l ong e dge o f t his a rtifact; r ight l ateral e dge a nd d istal e nd a re c overed b y t op r etouch a nd t op s tep s cars a nd a re m oderately d ulled; l eft l ateral e dge h as b ilateral f lakes w ith s harp e dges a nd i s m oderately d ulled.
f orms
No. 9 94 ( Figure 8 k). Unmodified p latform with q uadruple b ulb p roximal e nd . U nmodified e dge a nd s ome c ortex o n r ight l ateral ;
d istal
e nd
h as
b ilateral
f lakes
13 1
with
s harp
e dges
a nd
s ome
e dge
a . n o.234
b . n o .277
C . n o.1869
d . n o.280
e . n o.295
f . n o.307
h . n o.330
g . n o.308
0
F igure 8 :
cm
1 1
S haped T ools 1 14
2
f rom V lasac I
j . n o.335
k . n o.994
1 . n o .1950
m . n o .1951
p . n o.2055
n . n o .1967
r . n o.2063
s . n o.1859
F igure 8 ( cont'd) 1 15
t . n o.1974
V . n o.2048
w . n o.2062
x . n o.
y . n o.253
z . n o.938
a a . n o.1895
b b . n o.264
F igure 8 ( cont'd) 1 16
d ulling; l eft l ateral m oderate d ulling. N o .
1 950
e dge
( Figure 8 1) .
h as
t op
P roximal
r etouch
e nd
a nd
t op
s tep
s cars
i s u nmodified p latform ;
a nd
r ight
l ateral, d istal and l ower h alf o f l eft l ateral s haped b y i nverse r etouch a nd i nverse s tep s cars a nd e dges a re d ulled , w ith h eaviest w ear o n d istal-left l ateral r ounded e nd ; t he s hape a nd wear o n t his p iece r esembles n umbers 2 041, 2 049, 2 28 a nd 2 040 d escribed a bove . i n b eing m uch m ore e laborately s haped b y r etouch. No.
1 951
( Figure
8m).
Proximal
end
b roken
I t d iffers
o ff,
probably
d eliberately; r ight l ateral e dge h as t op r etouch a nd i s q uite s harp. The d ulled p rojecting p iece o f t he l eft l ateral e dge h as t op f lake r emovals w ith s harp e dges. N o . 1 967 ( Figure 8 n) . l ateral e dge s haped b y t op l ateral e dges u nmodified.
U nmodified p latform p resent; d ulled r ight r etouch a nd t op s tep s cars; d istal a nd l eft
N o . 2 055 ( Figure 80 . U nmodified p latform p resent; r ight l ateral unmodified and c overed with c ortex ; s harp l ower l eft l ateral i s i nversely r etouched. No . 2 063
( Figure 8 r).
Unmodified p latform p resent; f resh r ight
l ateral e dge i nversely r etouched f or o ne-fourth o f i ts l ength i n t he c enter a nd w ith s ome t op f lake r emovals f rom i ts l ower o ne-half; d istal e nd i s u nmodified ; d ulled l eft l ateral e dge t op r etouched a nd t op s tep s carred. No. 1 859 ( Figure 8 s). P latform i ntact, d istal e nd i nversely r etouched a nd s tep s carred t o f orm a p oint, e dges d ull; g raver. N o . 1 974 ( Figure 80 . P latform I ntact. D istal p oint a nd a djacent r ight l ateral e dge p olished; a djacent l eft l ateral e dge s lightly f laked, m id l eft l ateral e dge i nversely r etouched, q uite f resh; d rill. • No .
2 048
( Figure
8 v) .
P latform
i ntact;
r ight
l ateral
e dge
i nversely r etouched; point a nd a djacent l eft e dge t ip r etouched a nd p olished; l eft d istal e dge b ilaterally f laked; d rill. No. 2 062 ( Figure 8w). P latform c annot b e p ositively i dentified. R ight a nd l eft l ateral e dges a djacent t o d istal p oint a re u nilaterally r etouched, s tep s carred a nd d ulled; p oint i s r etouched with t op s tep s cars a nd i s q uite d ull;
g raver.
No., 241 ( Figure 8 x). d istal t op r etouched , s tep
P latform b roken s carred a nd d ulled
o ff; b oth l aterals a nd i n a s mooth h alf-circle ;
s craper. No. d istal,
2 53
h alf-circle; No.
( Figure
8 y).
a nd 2 /3 o f l eft
9 38
P latform
l ateral
i ntact;
l ower
r ight
t op r etouched a nd u sed,
l ateral,
i n a smooth
s craper. ( Figure
s carred and d ull;
8 z).
l eft
P latform
d istal and
i ntact;
l eft
117
r ight
l ateral
t op
l ateral
t op
s tep
r etouched,
s tep
s carred,
a nd u sed;
No.
1 895
s mooth h alf-circle,
( Figure 8 aa).
P latform
s craper. i ntact;
l ower
r ight
l ateral,
d istal and l eft l ateral t op r etouched a nd f laked, u sed; smooth h alfc ircle,
s craper.
No . 2 64 ( Figure 8 bb). P latform i ntact; whole r ight l ateral, d istal a nd l ower l eft l ateral t op r etouched, s tep s carred a nd u sed; s hredder?
1 18
S ummary o f R etouched P ieces T hree
p ieces
which w ere r etouched i n t he p rimary s ample o f V lasac
I were p robably n ot s ubsequently u sed. Twenty-one u sed p ieces were p robably r etouched . T hirty-two f lakes a nd 2 9 b lades, i n a ddition t o 2 4 s haped t ools, w ere c learly r etouched a nd u sed . Twenty-two f lakes w ere u sed o nly f or s craping , p rimarily o n t he e dge where t hey were r etouched . O ne f lake was u sed a s a r eamer , a nd n ine f lakes h ad t wo o r t hree s eparate e dge a reas u sed f or a ( complex) m ixture o f s craping a nd c utting . O f t he 2 9 r etouched b lades, 1 2 were u sed f or s craping where t hey w ere r etouched , t wo f or c utting , a nd t here w as o ne d enticulate a nd o ne
g raver .
E leven
c utting and s crapers.
c omplex b lades
s craping,
a nd
were u sed
t wo were u sed
f or
i n
s everal
a reas
c utting a nd a s
f or
n otch-
Among t he f ormal t ools a re f our c ircular s crapers, t wo g ravers, t wo d rills, a nd s everal g eometrics a nd m icroblades. S ummary O f T he V lasac I C hipped S tone T he c hipped s tone
f rom V lasac I b reaks
d own a s s hown i n T able 3 9.
T he b ulk o f t he 8 5 r etouched p ieces a re n ot f ormally s haped t ools t hey w ere p robably r etouched t o r esharpen t he w orking e dge w hile t hey w ere b eing u sed . T he s mall n umber o f f ormal t ools s haped b y r etouching o ffer b y t hemselves l ittle u nderstanding o f s tone t ool t echnology a nd t ool u tilization a t Vlasac I . Most o f t he r etouched p ieces s how s craper u tilization i n t he a rea where t hey a re r etouched; o nly 2 2 p ieces h ave c utting d amage. The p rimary u se o f r etouch i n V laspc I s tone t echnology was t o p repare or r epair e dges f or s craper u tilization . S econdarily r etouch was u sed t o s hape f ormal t ools. T wenty-nine p ercent,
o r 8 5 o ut o f 2 96 u sed a rtifacts,
w ere r etouched.
T urning t o u nretouched , u sed f lakes, b lades , a nd f lake/blades , w e f ind a f ew a rtifacts whose n atural s hapes h ave b een e xploited f or u se a s s pecialized t ools: r eamers ( 12) a nd d rills ( 8) . Most p ieces h ave b een u sed o n a c onvenient e dge f or o ne o peration , c utting o r s craping , a nd t hen d iscarded . T he i ntensity v ersus t he c asualness o f u tilization c an b e e stimated b y l ooking a t t he n umber o f a reas o f e dge u sed o n e ach p iece a s well a s whether o ne o r more s orts ( scraping, c utting, d rilling, e tc.) o f u tilization a re f ound o n t he s ame p ieces. P ieces with more t han o ne s ort o f u tilization h ave b een c alled c omplex t hroughout
t his d iscussion.
4 1.3% o f
t he u sed b lades a nd 5 1.8% o f
t he u sed f lakes were u sed
o nce a nd t hen d iscarded. B lades were more f requently c omplex t ools ( 28 .2%) t han were f lakes ( 23.3%) . B lade u tilization w as m ore i ntensive t han f lake u tilization . A h igher p ercentage o f u sed b lades ( 38 .6%) a s c ompared t o f lakes ( 18.9%) were r etouched, n ot i ncluding f ormally s haped t ools. Not all o f t his r etouch was f or t he s ake o f ( re)sharpening, b ut e ven i f i t were, i t c ould b e s aid t hat o nly o ne t ime o ut o f t hree d id a worker c hoose t o r esharpen a worn b lade, a nd o ne t ime o ut i n T able 4 0. I t
i s
o f
f ive a w orn f lake .
i nteresting
t o
n ote
1 19
T hese d istributions a re s ummarized
t hat
t here
were
n o
r etouched
T ABLE 3 9 V LASAC I C HIPPED S TONE C ATEGORIES
C ategory
N umber
U nused s hatter
1 7
3 .4
)
U nused p robably s truck f lakes
2 6
5 .2
) )
1 .4
) )
P roximally t runcated u nused f lakes
7
U nused b lades
1 1
2 .2
) )
U nused f lake/blades
1 0
2 .0
) )
U nused w hole f lakes
8 3
1 6.6
) )
lakes P ossibly u se-d f
1 6
3 .2
P ossibly u sed b lades
6 1
1 2.2
P ossibly u sed f läke/blades
4
0 .8
U sed b lades
4 6
9 .2
U sed f lake/blades
2 8
5 .6
1 37
2 7.4
1 1
2 .2
1 0
2 .0
U sed f lakes
1 54 u nused 3 0.8%
) ) ) ) )
2 11 u sed 4 2.2%
P robably r etouched u sed f lakes P robably r etouched u sed b lades R etouched,
u nused p ieces
3
0 .6
R etouched a nd u sed f lakes
3 2
6 .4
) )
R etouched a nd u sed b lades
2 9
5 .8
) )
F ormally s haped t ools
2 4
4 .8
)
T otal
5 00
1 20
8 5 r etouched 1 7%
>2 I
CO •
-1 .•
vl -
0
CV CO
I A c o a ) , . 2 c o ✓ 1 . r I ,
ä
1
1N. 1
N. •
N. •
r i
0
c h
CV
0
t il
1 .1
1 `. . NI
. . .1
v4 -
•
CV
O •
1 , •
74
F lake/Blades
TABLE 4 0
o
. I
X
•
0
,. t .
•
•
CD
, i -
L r 1
CV
I f) •
1 . 4 •
CO •
C f)
N.
1 , 14
1 .1
I
C\ I
ZI
1
. t ie 1
C r) •
.1 •
1 1) •
N. •
.i .. .t .
o CV
o
P4 N1
ON 14
C\I v1
(1 Z
c n
I
i n
i
L . r )
0 , i
c C ' )
(N I
0 )
I
1: 1 a ) U )
U )
0
c v
_
vI
(N J
(r )
e
. . , , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . . ,
g 4 < W
> 4 W
E 0
C Z
C I)
i n
. . , . . , . . , , ., . _,
C . )
e o
C .)
f lake/blades. F lake/blades were most f requently d iscarded a fter o ne u tilization , l ike f lakes . B ut a s urprising n umber ( 28 .4%) were c omplex t ools . O ne h ypothesis c oncerning f lake/blades i s t hat t he c ategory a s u sed h ere c ontains a m ixture o f a rtifacts which , while n ot f itting t he a rcheologist's d efinition o f b lades, f it t he u sers' d efinition , a nd were s o u sed a s b lades ( the c omplex t ools) , a nd a s econd g roup which were u sed a s f lakes s ince t hey l acked t he s alient c haracteristics o f b lades for t he u sers, although t hey p ossessed s ome o f t he a rcheologist's f ormal c haracteristics o f b lades ( the s imple u sed, f lake/blades). T hese d ata c ertainly s uggest t hat t he c ategory, " flake/blades ' " , u sed with microscopic u se-wear d ata, c ould l ead t o i nsights i nto t he r elationship b etween f orm a nd f unction.
2 11,
O ut o f 3 91 u nretouched f lakes, b lades, f lake/blades, a nd s hatter , o r 5 3.9% were u sed . N one o f t he s hatter o r p robably s truck f lakes
c ould b e j udged t o b e u sed, a lthough s ome o f t his c ould b e d ue t o t he h igh f requency o f c oarse-grained r ocks i n t hese c ategories. O f t he t otal o f 1 02 b lades, o nly e leven s howed a bsolutely n o s igns o f u se, whereas 9 0 o ut o f 2 86 f lakes, a lmost o ne-third, s howed a bsolutely n o s igns o f u se. This i s i n a ccord with o ther i ndications c ited a bove t hat b lades w ere m ore i ntensively u sed t han w ere f lakes. B ilateral a nd u nilateral e dge d amage a re a bout e qually r epresented o n u sed f lakes a nd b lades. O n r etouched f lakes a nd b lades h owever, unilateral d amage p redominates. s ee P rinz, 1 982, p p.187-206).
( For d etailed a rtifact d escriptions,
V lasac I I C ores
( 200)
The main d ata s et c ontained 3 5 c ores a nd 1 6 c ore f ragments b elonging t o V lasac I I . T hirty-three c ores a nd f ifteen c ore f ragments were f lint, o ne c ore was q uartz, o ne v olcanic, a nd o ne c ore f ragment was s ilica. T hree o f t he c ore f ragments were a ctually s truck f lakes which h ad d etached a l arge c hunk o f c ore, a nd t wo o f t hese h ad a lso b een u nilaterally r etouched a nd u sed f or s craping. E ight o ther f ragments were a lso u sed. F ive were u sed o n o ne t o t hree e dges a s s crapers. One was a n otch, o ne was r etouched, t hree were p ossibly r etouched, o ne was u sed f or c utting, a nd o ne f or b oth c utting a nd s craping. Three
o f
t he whole
c ores
h ad
u nretouched b urin e dge a nd t wo a s
b een u sed,
o ne
a s
a g raver
o n a n
s crapers.
A s i n V lasac I , t he c ore f ragments i n V lasac I I a re c onsistently smaller i n t heir l argest d imension t han t he c ores, a gain s uggesting t hat c ores f ragmented a s t hey d iminished i n l ength t o t he v icinity o f 2 0 mm . O nly 9 o f t he 3 5 c ores s howed n o e vidence o f b lade p roduction , and t hese n ine c ortex o n t hem .
were n ot p articularly l arge o r m ore l ikely t o h ave Most c ores were u sed f or t he p roduction o f b oth b lades
a nd f lakes. T hirteen l evels
o f
c ores
a nd
n ine
c ore
f ragments
s quare 5 23.
122
w ere
f ound
i n
t he
z one I I
I n t he u nsorted b agged r emainder o f Vlasac c hipped s tone t here w ere 2 9 c ores a nd 9 8 c ore f ragments a ssociated w ith V lasac I I . Twenty o f t he c ores w ere f lake c ores ( 13 h ad c ortex) , t hree w ere f lake/blade c ores
( 2 h ad c ortex),
a nd 6 w ere b lade c ores
( 3 h ad c ortex).
C ores f rom V lasac I I t hus t otal 7 7, a nd c ore f ragments t otal 1 23. A ssuming t hat 2 c ore f ragments r epresent o ne c ore g ives a c ore t otal o f f ragments
a nd
c ore r ejuvenation f lakes o f 1 :24, c onsistent w ith i n s itu k napping , i ncreasingly c areful e xploitation o f f lint r esources.
1 38
a nd
a r atio
o f
c ores
a nd
U nretouched U sed B lades T here
w ere 3 7
t o
f lakes,
b lades ,
f lake-blade
( 81)
s imple
b lades
w ith b ilateral
c utting u se
d amage ,
4
b lades with e dge d ulling b ut n o f lake o r s tep s car d amage, a nd 4 1 b lades with c omplex e dges. A ll o f t he s craping d amage with t he e xception o f t hree r eamers, was o n s ections o f s traight e dge . U nretouched ,
U sed F lake/Blades
( 53)
T here w ere 5 3 u sed f lake/blades . S eventeen h ad b een u sed o nly f or c utting , e ighteen o nly f or s craping , i ncluding t wo r eamer-shaped p ieces a nd o ne n otch , o ne f or a n u nidentified a ction which d ulled t he e dge b ut d id n ot p roduce d amage f lakes, a nd s eventeen were c omplex t ools i ncluding t wo g raver-piercers o ne o f w hich a lso h ad a n otch o n i t. U nretouched, U sed F lakes
( 219)
There were 2 19 u sed f lakes
i n V lasac I I.
F ifty-seven h ad o nly
b ilateral, c utting/piercing d amage. O f t hese, t hree f it t he d escription o f p ieces e squillees a nd t wo a ppear t o h ave b een u sed a s p iercers . Two f lakes h ad d ulled e dges w ithout l ateral r emovals , n inety f lakes h ad o nly u nilateral, s craper u se, d amage. T en o f t hese h ad d amaged e dges whose s hapes were c onsistent with u se a s r eamers, a nd t hree were n otches. T here were 6 5 c omplex t ools, o f which f ive h ad u nilateral d amage o n r eamer-shaped e dges, o ne a g raver, a nd t wo w ere d rills. R etouched,
U sed S haped T ools
F orty-three p ieces s haped t ools. No.
8 05
o ne was
e squillees,
( 43)
f rom V lasac I I h ave b een c lassified a s f ormally
T heir i ndividual d escriptions ( Figure
a p ieces
9 a).
B lade
with
f ollow.
p latform
a nd
b ulb
r emoved,
u nilaterally r etouched a nd s tep s carred o n b oth l ateral e dges; p ointed ( proximal) e nd i s b ilaterally f lake d amaged a nd s tep s carred a nd d ull a s
f rom
u se
a s
a p iercer
o r
d rill;
d istal
e nd
u nused;
c lassical
g ravette p oint. No.
8 08
( Figure
9 b).
P latform a nd
b ulb
r emoved,
u nilaterally
r etouched, s tep s carred a nd d ulled o n whole o f l eft l ateral a nd 1 /2 o f r ight l ateral, a nd p rojecting v entral medial s pine. P roximal e nd u nused;
d istal e nd d ulled b urin f acet with u nilateral s tep s carring
( graver).
1 23
a . n o .805
b .
C . n o .924
d . n o.927
0
f . n o .1964
e . n o.1962
0 j
F igure 9 :
c r n
1
,
n o .808
2
1
S haped T ools f rom V lasac I I
1 24
g .
n o.2010
h . n o.)/ 11
j . n o.889
F igure
9 ( cont'd) 1 25
k .
n o.930
1 .
n o.932
m . n o.1935
F igure 9 ( cont'd) 1 26
n . -r fö .1956
p . n o.1120
t . n o.2008
V . n o.2030
w . n o.2072
x .
F igure 9 ( cont'd)
1 27
n o.2013
CC.
n o. 1 975
d d. n o.1971
f f. n o.1824
e e. n o.1825
. n o.1866 h i-i
g. n o.2027 g
F igure 9 ( cont'd)
1 28
j. n o.1923 j
k. n o.56 k
1 1 . n o.990
m m . n o.1007
n n . n o.2028
p p . n o.2038
r r . n o.886
F igure 9 ( cont 'd) 1 29
t t. n o .829
v v . n o.754
w w . n o .2069
F igure 9 ( cont'd)
1 30
N o . 9 24 ( Figure 9 c) . P latform a nd b ulb g one, t op r etouch a nd s tep s cars c over a ll b ut u nused, d istal e nd; t humbnail s craper. No. 9 27 ( Figure 9 d). P latform p resent, s urrounded b y small a rea o f u nused e dge o n b oth s ides . R emainder o f e dge u nilaterally r etouched w ith s ome s tep s cars; t humbnail s craper. No. 1 962 ( Figure 9 e). Area o f e ither p latform o r u nused b reak, s urrounded b y u nused e dge o n e ither s ide ; r est o f e dge i s u nilaterally r etouched,
s tep s carred,
a nd r ather d ull;
t humbnail s craper.
No. 1 964 ( Figure 9 f). Area o f platform o r unused b reak; r emainder o f e dge i s unilaterally r etouched a nd s tep s carred, a nd d ull ; t humbnail s craper . N o.
2 010
( Figure 9 g).
S ame a s N o.
9 27;
t humbnail s craper.
N o . 4 41 ( Figure 9 h) . P latform p resent; l eft l ateral e dge u nused ; r ight l ateral a nd d istal u nilaterally r etouched a nd s tep s carred a nd q uite d ull;
b ig s craper.
No. 8 89 ( Figure 9 j) . P latform p resent; most o f l ateral e dges unused; l ower l aterals a nd d istal unilaterally r etouched a nd s tep s carred; b ig s craper. No. 9 30 ( Figure 9 k). P latform a nd b ulb p resent; u pper l ateral unused; r emainder o f e dge unilaterally r etouched a nd s carred; N o .
l eft s tep
b ig s craper. 9 32
( Figure
9 1) .
P latform p resent ;
l eft
l ateral u nused ;
r ight
l ateral a nd d istal u nilaterally r etouched with s ome s tep s cars;
b ig
s craper. No. 1 935 ( Figure 9m). r ight
l ateral
a nd
d istal
P roximal e nd b roken; l eft l ateral u nused;
u nilaterally
r etouched
a nd
s tep
s carred ;
p resent,
b ut
c rushed;
b ig
s craper. No.
1 956
( Figure
9 n).
P latform
l ateral
e dges t o e ither s ide o f p latform u nilaterally ( one i nverse, o ne t op) r etouched, s tep s carred a nd d ulled; l ower l eft l ateral a nd d istal u nused ; p iercer? No. 1 120
( Figure 9 p).
P latform b roken o ff;
l eft p oint
d ull a nd
c rushed; e dges o n e ither s ide unilaterally ( one t op, o ne i nverse) r etouched, s tep s carred a nd d ulled; r ight p oint q uite s harp b ut with s ome
i nverse
f lake
d amage
b ilaterally d amaged a nd u sed; N o .
4 50
( Figure
9 r) .
a nd
s tep
P latform p resent;
l eft l ateral t op r etouch a nd s tep l ateral i nverse r etouch a nd s tep r etouch; No. p ointed
s carring;
l ower
r ight
l ateral
p iercer?
s cars, s cars;
p ointed d istal
e nd u nused ;
d ulled e dge; l ower r ight u pper r ight l ateral, t op
u nused p iercer? 7 66
( Figure
d istal
9 s).
e nd u nused;
D ecortication r ight
1 31
l ateral
f lake; i nverse
p latform r etouch
p resent; a nd
s tep
s cars, d ull; l ower l eft l ateral t op r etouch a nd s tep s cars, l eft l ateral i nverse s tep s cars, d ull; u nused p iercer? No.
2 008
( Figure
9 t).
l ower l eft l ateral t op r etouched a nd s tep s cars; p iercer?
P latform
p resent;
d istal
d ull ;
p oint
u pper
u nused;
s tep s cars; l ower r ight l ateral i nverse u pper r ight l ateral t op f lake d amage ; u nused
No. 2 030 ( Figure 9 v). P latform p resent; d istal p oint u nused; l ower l eft l ateral t op r etouch a nd s tep s cars, e dge d ulled ; l ower r ight i nverse r etouch a nd s tep s cars, e dge d ulled; u nused p iercer? No. 2 072 ( Figure 9 w).
P latform p resent;
U pper l eft
l ateral t op
r etouch a nd s tep s cars; l ower l eft l ateral t o p oint r etouch a nd s tep s cars; m iddle r ight l ateral t op r etouch a nd s tep s cars; p oint? N o. 2 013 ( Figure 9 x). P latform p resent, u pper l eft l ateral t op d amage f lakes r emoved, e dge f resh; l ower l eft l ateral t o p oint t op r etouch a nd t op s tep s cars, d ull e dge ; l ower r ight l ateral t op r etouch ; p oint? No.
9 77
( Figure
9 y).
p oint i nverse f lake d amage ; d ull e dge ; p oint? No.
4 35
( Figure
9 z).
P latform p resent;
l ower
l eft
l ateral
t o
l ower r ight l ateral r etouch a nd s tep s cars,
P latform
p resent;
u pper
r ight
l ateral
( notch) b ilateral s tep s cars, d ulled e dge; d istal e dge , t op s tep s cars, d ulled e dge ; b oth s ides o f l eft r ounded p oint, i nverse r etouch , p oint i s unused; r eamer? N o .
middle
1 999
l eft
( Figure
l ateral,
9 aa) .
t op
s tep
N o p latform ;
s cars,
d ull
e dge;
u nused
t op r etouch a nd s tep s cars o n
l eft p roximal e dge, r ight p roximal e dge i nverse s tep s cars; r etouch s urrounding l ower r ight p oint, which h as s ome f lake r emovals b ut a f resh e dge, l eft p rotrusion u nused; u nused r eamer? No . l ateral,
1 976 ( Figure 9 bb). P roximal e nd t runcated(?), l ower icrolith. r etouched s tep s carred a nd d ull; g eometric .m
N o .
1 975
b roken ; u nused.
most
( Figure o f
9 cc) .
r ight
P roximal a nd d istal
l ateral
r etouched,
e nds
e dge
u nused ,
f resh;
l eft
l eft
p ossibly l ateral
No. 1 971 ( Figure 9 dd). P roximal e nd c urved, u pper r ight l ateral r etouched a nd s tep s carred , with d ull e dge ; l eft l ateral a nd l eft s ide o f d istal,
e dge w orn ,
n o f lake d amage;
No. 1 825 ( Figure 9 ee).
m icrolith.
P latform p resent;
r etouched with s tep s cars a nd u sed e dge; u se;
r ight l ateral s teeply
d orsal a nd l eft l ateral n o
m icrolith.
. No. 1 824 ( Figure 9 ff). P latform p resent; l eft l ateral s teeply r etouched a nd s tep s carred w ith u sed e dge; d orsal u nused; m icrolith. .
1 32
N o . 2 027 ( Figure 9 gg) . P latform p resent; m iddle s ection o f r ight l ateral a nd d orsal a re r etouched w ith s tep s cars o n a u sed e dge ; l eft l ateral e dge i s f resh w ith a f ew b ilateral f lakes r emoved; m icrolith. No. 1 866 ( Figure 9 hh). P latform p resent; b oth l ateral e dges r etouched b ut e dge q uite f resh; d orsal e dge u nused; s imilar t o 2 027. N o . 1 923 ( Figure 9 jj) . P latform p resent; b oth l ateral u sed e dges a re r etouched a nd s tep s carred ; d istal e dge u nused ; s imilar t o 2 027 a nd 1 866. No. 5 60 ( Figure 9 kk). P latform p resent; l eft l ateral r etouched, s tep s carred a nd d ull; r ight l ateral u sed, with b ilateral f lakes r emoved; g eometric. N o . 9 90 ( Figure 9 11) . P roximal e nd b roken ; d istal e nd r etouched , s tep s carred a nd d ull ; b oth l ateral e dges u sed , l eft l ateral with b il ateral f lake d amage, r ight l ateral w ithout f lake d amage; g eometric. No.
1 007
( Figure
9mm) .
P roximal
e nd
b roken ;
r etouched, s tep s carred a nd d ull; d istal r etouched, u sed; l eft l ateral u nused; g eometric.
r ight
l ateral
s tep s carred a nd
N o. 2 028 ( Figure 9 nn). F ragment; b roken o n l eft l ateral a nd d istal e nds; c ortex o n p roximal e nd ; r ight l ateral i s r etouched , f resh e dge; u nclear where f lake was s truck f rom, o r whether t his i s a d eliberately s napped g eometric o r a f ragment. N o . 2 038 ( Figure 9 pp) . R ight l ateral r etouched a nd s tep s carred ; h eavier w ear o n u pper e nd , s ome p olish ; f ragment -a ll o ther e dges a re b roken. N o .
8 86
b oth l ateral f resh.
( Figure 9 rr) . e dges;
P latform p resent;
l ateral
e dges
d ull;
r etouch a nd s tep s cars o n
d istal
e dge
r etouched
a nd
No. 9 02 ( Figure 9 ss). P latform p resent; d ull e dge a nd s tep s car o n u pper l eft a nd r ight l ateral a nd e dge o f p latform; r est o f e dge i s r etouched, s tep s carred a nd d ull.
a re
No. 8 29 ( Figure 9 tt). P latform p resent; l eft l ateral a nd d istal r etouched a nd s tep s carred a nd u sed-dull; r ight l ateral i s
r etouched w ith p olished. N o, 7 54
e dges
o f
( Figure
r etouch
9 vv).
s cars
a braded ;
s tep
P latform p resent;
s carred ,
l ower
l eft
a nd
a nd
d ull-
r ight
l aterals a nd d istal a re r etouched, s tep s carred a nd u sed; u pper l eft l ateral i s d ull a nd i nversely s tep-scarred; u pper r ight l ateral i s b ilaterally f laked a nd u sed; N o. 2 069
s hredder.
( Figure 9ww).
l ateral a nd d istal a re o f e dge a re d ulled;
P latform p resent;
r etouched ,
l ower r ight a nd l eft
s tep-scarred a nd p rojecting
l ike 7 54.
1 33
p ortions
S ummary o f R etouched P ieces T hirteen b lades, f lakes
w ere u sed a nd
7 f lake/blades, p robably
3 3 f lakes,
r etouched .
a nd 1 5 p robably s truck
F ourteen p robable
f lakes,
3 2
b lades, 1 9 f lake/blades, 5 0 f lakes, a nd 4 3 s haped t ools w ere b oth r etouched a nd u sed . B oth r etouch a nd u se d amage o n a ll 1 7 s imple b lades w as u nilateral . A ll o f t he c omplex b lades h ad o nly u nilateral u se o f t he ( unilaterally) r etouched e dge a reas. T here were f our n otches among t he b lades . F lake/blades i ncluded o ne p ieces e squillees, two n otches, a nd a g raver . R etouch a nd u se-damage o f r etouched e dge was a ll u nilateral f or t hese p ieces, w ith t he e xception o f t he p ieces e squillees. Two o f t he r etouched p robable f lakes were b i -l aterally r etouched a nd h ad b ilateral u se d amage o n t he r etouched e dge . O ther p robable f lakes h ad o nly s craper-use o f r etouched e dges. O ne r etouched f lake was a lso b ilaterally r etouched a nd u se-damaged , -a nother p ieces e squillees .
O ther s imple f lakes
were
a ll u nilaterally
r etouched a nd
d amaged, a nd i ncluded t wo r eamers a nd o ne u nused p oint, which would h ave b een s uitable f or a g raver o r p iercer . C omplex f lakes i ncluded 2 r eamers, 1 n otch , a nd a u sed p iercer w hich h ad a lso b een r etouched a nd u sed a s a s craper o n a s traight e dge. T he f ormally s haped t ools i ncluded o nly f our a rtifacts with b il ateral d amage--four o f t he micro t ools h ad b ilateral d amage o n a n e dge which was n ot r etouched . A ll o ther u se d amage a nd r etouch was u nilateral , e xcept f or t he d amage t o t he e nd o f t he o ne p iercer . T here was o ne g raver , n ine u nused p iercer/drill/points?, f our t humbnail a nd f ive b ig s crapers, o ne u nused r eamer , o ne c ombination r eamer a nd n otch a nd t en m icroliths. S ummary O f T he V lasac I I C hipped S tone T he c hipped s tone f rom V lasac I I b reaks d own a s T he p rimary u se o f r etouch i n V lasac I I
was
s hown i n T able 4 1.
t o r epair a nd p repare
e dges f or s craper u tilization . 2 5.6% o f a ll u sed a rtifacts were r etouched. R etouch was s econdarily u sed t o s hape f ormal t ools. Twenty-seven p ercent o f a ll r etouched p ieces were f ormally s haped t ools. Out
o f
t he
6 29
unretouched
f lakes,
b lades,
f lake/blades,
a nd
s hatter , 3 71, o r 5 8 .9% , w ere u sed . A n umber o f u nretouched f lakes a nd b lades h ad n atural s hapes w hich w ere e xploited f or s pecial u ses: f our p ieces e squillees, f our p iercers, t hirteen r eamers , t hree n otches, a nd two gravers were u sed without r etouch. The general i ntensity/casualness o f u tilization c an b e g auged b y l ooking a t t he n umber o f e dge a reas u sed b efore a t ool w as d iscarded , a nd t he n umber o f p ieces u sed f or more t han o ne s ort o f t ask ( cutting, s craping, d rilling, e tc.), w hich h ave b een c alled c omplex t ools. T hirty-three p ercent o f t he u sed b lades, 4 5% o f t he f lake/blades, a nd 4 6% o f t he f lakes were u sed o nce a nd t hen d iscarded. B lades were more f requently c omplex t ools ( 41%) a s o pposed t o f lake/blades ( 32%) a nd f lakes ( 31.2%) . D iscounting t he f ormally s haped p ieces, 2 4% o f a ll u sed b lades were r etouched. 2 6.3% o f a ll u sed f lake/blades were r etouched,
a nd
1 8.6%
o f
a ll
u sed
1 34
f lakes
were
r etouched.
T hese
T ABLE 4 1 V LASAC I I C HIPPED S TONE C ATEGORIES
U nused s hatter
N o. 2 5
27 9)
U nused p robable f lakes
3 8
) 4 .4) ) )
P roximally t runcated u nused f lakes
1
0 .1)
U nused f lakes
8 8
) 1 0.3)
U nused b lades
3 4
) 3 .9)
U nused f lake/blades
3 6
) 4 .2)
P ossibly u sed f lakes
1 3
1 .5
P ossibly u sed f lake/blades
1 3
1 .5
P ossibly u sed b lades
7
0 .8
P ossibly u sed p robable f lakes
3
0 .3
U sed b lades
9 8
U sed f lake/blades
5 3
U sed s hatter
1
U sed f lakes
2 19
P robably r etouched,
u sed b lades
P robably r etouched, p robable f lakes
u sed,
P robably r etouched, f lake/blades
u sed
1.4) 1 ) 6 .2) ) 0 .1) ) 2 5.6) )
1 3
1 .5)
1 5
) ) 1 .7)
7 3 3
) 3 .8)
R etouched, f lakes
1 4
1 .6)
R etouched u sed b lades
3 3
) 3 .8) )
R etouched u sed f lake/blades
1 9
2 .2)
5 1
) 5 .9)
( 51.4%)
4 3 8 53
) 5 .0) 1 00.0
p robable
R etouched u sed f lakes R etouched,
4 39 u sed
) ) 0 .8)
P robably r etouched u sed f lakes u sed,
22 u nused 2 ( 26.0%)
u sed s hape t ools T otal
135
1 60 r etouched ( 18.7%)
d istributions a re s ummarized
i n T able 4 2.
T aking a s till b roader v iew, o ne u tilization b y i ncluding u nused p ieces,
c an l ook a t t he i ntensity o f a s s hown i n T able 4 3 . B lades
c an b e s een t o b e c onsistently h eavily e xploited: 8 0% o f a ll b lades p roduced were u sed, a nd o f t hose which were u sed b ut n ot r etouched, o nly 3 3% were u sed o nly o nce a nd d iscarded. F lake/blades were most f requently d iscarded without b eing u sed ( 1/3). H owever, o f t hose f lake/blades s elected f or u se , a h igher p ercentage w ere r etouched t han b lades ( 26.3% a s o pposed t o 2 4%). O n t he o ther h and, 4 5.3% o f t he u sed f lake/blades were d iscarded a fter b eing u sed o nly o nce. U sed f lakes a re s imilar t o f lake/blades i n b eing m ost f requently d iscarded a fter o ne
u se
( 46.5%) .
U nlike
b lades
o f u sed f lakes w ere r etouched
a nd
f lake/blades ,
a s maller
p ercentage
( 18.6%).
F lake/blades a re u tilized l ike f lakes i n s ome r espects ( percentage o f u sed p ieces d iscarded a fter o ne u se) , a nd l ike b lades i n o ther r espects ( percentage o f u sed p ieces which were r etouched). T he p ercentage o f f lake/blades d iscarded w ithout b eing u sed d istinguishes f lake/blades f rom b oth b lades a nd f lakes . T his l ater c haracteristic i s p robably d ue t o t he f act t hat a n umber o f f lake/blades w ere n ot " true" b lades b ecause o f i rregularities i n t he r aw m aterial which c aused t he f racture t o g o a stray a nd p roduce a n o dd-shaped a rtifact. I f a ll r etouch ( discounting t he 4 3 " formally s haped t ools" ) w ere f or ( re)sharpening, i t c ould b e s aid t hat o nly o ne o f f our b lades a nd f lake/blades a nd o ne o ut o f 5 1 /2 f lakes w ere r esharpened r ather t han b eing d iscarded b y a w orker . s ee P rinz, 1 982, p p.218-244).
( For
d etailed
d escriptions
o f
a rtifaCts,
V lasac I II C ores Twenty-three c ores a nd e ight c ore f ragments a ssociated w ith V lasac I II were f ound i n t he p rimary d ata s et. A ll 3 1 p ieces were f lint. F our o f t he f ragments w ere a ctually s truck f lakes w hich h ad d etached a l arge c hunk o f c ore. T hree f ragments were s ubsequently u sed f or s craping a nd h ad o ne o r t wo u sed e dges . O ne f ragment w as u nilaterally r etouched o n i ts u sed e dge. F our
o f
t he
c ores
h ad
b een u sed,
a ll
f or
s craping ,
a nd
o ne
o f
t hese was p ossibly r etouched. T he p ossibly r etouched a nd u sed p iece was a v ery r educed p encil-shaped b lade c ore w ith b lades s truck f rom o pposite e nds . T he t hree o ther u sed o nes w ere a morphous f lake c ores, o ne o r t wo s craping.
c onvenient
e dges
o f
e ach
o f
which
h ad
b een
u sed
f or
I n V lasac I II t he t endency f or c ore f ragments t o b e s maller i n a ll d imensions t han whole c ores a ppears t o b e g one . Among t he w hole c ores, n ine w ere b lade c ores, e ight w ere f lake c ores, a nd f our s howed e vidence o f h aving y ielded b oth b lades a nd f lakes . B lade c ores a re n ot s maller t han f lake c ores. T he u nsorted b agged m aterial f or V lasac I II y ielded 6 whole c ores a nd 8 0 f ragments. F ive o f t he whole c ores were f lake c ores ( 3 h ad c ortex) a nd t he s ixth c ore w as a f lake/blade c ore ( with n o
136
T ABLE 4 2 V LASAC I I A RTIFACT C ATEGORIES A ND P ATTERNS O F U SE N o. e dge a reas u sed
S imple
C omplex
F lakes ( 219) n o.
B lades ( 99) %
F lake/Blades ( 53)
n o.
%
n o.
%
( 1 (
1 02
4 6.5
3 3
3 3.0
2 4
4 5.3
( 2
4 0
1 8.2
2 0
2 0.0
1 8
3 3.9
( ( 3
9
4 .1
( ( 4
1
0 .4
4
4 .0
( 2
3 9
1 7.8
1 9
1 9.0
( ( 3
1 8
8 .0
1 6
1 6.0
( ( 4
1 1
5 .0
( ( 5 ( ( 6
1
0 .4
2
2 .0
3
3 .0
1
1 .0
2
3 .8
1 1
2 0.7
5
9 .4
1
1 .9
T ABLE 4 3 V LASAC I I I NTENSITY O F A RTIFACT U TILIZATION
B lades
F lake/Blades
F lakes
n o. U nused
3 4
2 0.6
3 6
3 3.3
8 8
2 4.6
U sed
9 9
6 0.0
5 3
4 9.0
2 19
6 1.3
R etouched u sed
3 3
1 9.3
1 9
1 7.6
5 1
1 4.0
T otal
1 65
1 08
1 37
3 58
c ortex). S quare 5 23, which p roved t o b e p oor i n V lasac I II c hipped s tone, c ontained e ight c ores a nd f ive c ore f ragments, a ll f lint. V lasac I II
c hipped
s tone
t hus
p roduced a t otal
o f
3 7
c ores a nd 9 2
c ore f ragments, which y ields a r atio o f c ores t o f lakes o f 1 :28. T he r atio o f c ores a nd c ore f ragments t o f lakes, b lades a nd o ther p roducts o f knapping t hus s hows smooth i ncrease t hrough t ime a t V lasac, f rom 1 :18 t o 1 :24 t o 1 :28. U nretouched,
U sed F lakes
( 93)
T here were 9 3 u sed f lakes i n t he V lasac I II material. t hese h ad b ilateral , c utting-use d amage o n o ne o r t wo e dges .
T hirty o f F orty-two
f lakes h ad u nilateral, s craper-type d amage o n o ne ( 24), t wo ( 14) o r more ( 2) e dges, i ncluding o ne n otch a nd o ne g raver . There were 2 1 c omplex t ools, i ncluding o ne n otch . U nretouched,
U sed B lades
( 61)
There were s ixty-one u sed b lades i n t he V lasac I II material. N ineteen b lades h ad b ilateral , c utting u se d amage o n o ne o r t wo e dges . F ourteen b lades h ad u nilateral , s craper-type d amage o n o ne ( 9) , t wo ( 4) o r t hree ( 1) e dges. T here w ere t wenty-seven c omplex o ne d rill, w hich h ad t en d istinct a reas o f e dge w ear. U nretouched,
U sed F lake/Blades
t ools,
i ncluding
( 21)
Twenty-one u nretouched u sed f lake/blades were p resent i n t he V lasac I II m aterial . E leven h ad b ilateral , c utting-use d amage o n o ne o r t wo e dges. F ive a rtifacts h ad u nilateral s craper t ype d amage o n o ne , t wo o r t hree e dges, i ncluding o ne a rtifact which h ad t wo h eavily u sed s hallow n otches. T here w ere f ive c omplex t ools w hich e ach h ad t wo u sed e dges. R etouched S haped T ools N o.
1 872
( 36)
( Figure
1 0a).
P latform
u niformly r etouched a nd s tep s carred; d amaged a nd e dge p olished. N o .
1 444
r etouched a nd d istal e nd,
( Figure
1 0b) .
P latform
i ntact,
r ight
l ateral
e dge
l eft l ateral e dge b ilaterally
i ntact,
r ight
l ateral
e dge
e venly
s tep s carred ; b ilateral r etouch a nd u se d amage t o r ight i nverse d amage t o l eft d istal-left l ateral c urving
j uncture. N o. 1 185 ( Figure 1 0c). P latform i ntact; l ower l ateral e dges a nd d istal e nd r etouched i nto a s mooth a rc a nd d ulled w ith s tep s carring ; m id-right l ateral h as i nverse s craper d amage, m id-left l ateral h ad b ilateral u se-damage. N o. d istal
1 180 e nd
( Figure
r etouched
1 0d). i nto
P latform i ntact; a smooth
s craper d amage.
1 38
a rc;
l eft
u pper
l ateral e dge a nd
r ight
l ateral
e dge
a . n o .1872
/ 1 ) 1 b . n o. 14
c . n o .1185
d . n o.1180
e .
f . n o.1539
n o.946
0 j
F igure 1 0:
c r n
1
2
S haped T ools f rom V lasac I II 1 39
g . n o.1941
h . n o.1981
j . n o.1235
k . n o.1850
1 . n o.1855
m . n o.1403
F igure 1 0
( cont'd)
1 40
n . n o.1259
r . n o.1296
S . n o.1665
g
V . n o.1978
w . n o.1933
x . n o.1251
y . n o.2070
z . n o.1876
F igure
1 0
( cont'd)
1 41
n o.2029
b b. n o.1278
c c. n o.1241
d d. n o.1977
e e.
f f. n o.2023
1 003
g g. n o.2035
. n o.1877 h i-i
j j. n o.1276
k. n o.2001 k
F igure 1 0
( cont'd)
1 42
1 1 . n o .2 005
m m . n o.1388
n n . n o.1884
p p. n o.1292
F igure
1 0
( cont'd)
1 43
No. 9 46 ( Figure 1 0e). P latform i ntact; r ight l ateral e dge a nd d istal e nd r etouched i nto a s mooth a rc -edge p olished ; n o o ther u se d amage. No.
1 539
( Figure
1 0f).
Uncertain
p latform
u nilateral u se d amage a nd s potty r etouch t o p roduce
i dentification;
" shredder" e dge.
N o. 1 941 ( Figure 1 0 0 . P latform i ntact; u pper 2 /3 o f r ight l ateral e dge r etouched a nd s tep s carred ; m ost o f l eft l ateral e dge h as s craper d amage. No.
1 981
( Figure 1 0h).
P latform i ntact;
r etouched o n u pper a nd
l ower a reas o f b oth l ateral e dges a nd o n t he n osed p rojection o f t he l eft l ateral-distal c orner; a ll o f t he r etouched a reas a re u sed amaged. N o . e dges
l ateral s carred, N o . i s
1 235
( Figure
a nd d istal
1 0j) .
e nd ;
t he
P latform c oncave
i ntact;
r etouched
i rregular
e dge
o n b oth l ateral
s ection o n t he
e dge i s i nversely r etouched; b oth l ateral t he d istal e nd i s n ot; a ll e dges a re d ull. 1 850
r etouched
( Figure 1 0k) . a nd
s tep
P latform r etouched a way ;
s carred
a nd
d ull,
t he
e dges
l eft
r ight
r ight
a re
s tep
l ateral e dge
l ateral
e dge
i s
b ilaterally d amaged a nd u sed. N o . 1 855 ( Figure 1 01) . P latform i ntact ; l ower 2 /3 o f l eft l ateral e dge i s i nversely r etouched a nd a ppears u sed; u pper 2 /3 o f t he r ight l ateral e dge i s No.
1 403
r etouched,
b ilaterally d amaged a nd u sed. ( Figure
s tep
1 0m).
s carred
P latform
a nd
d ulled;
i ntact; d istal
b oth p oint
b ilaterally s tep s carred w ith u nilateral d amage f lakes
l ateral i s
e dges
d ulled
a nd
( graver?).
No. 1 259 ( Figure 1 0n). P latform b roken o ff; b oth l ateral e dges b ilaterally r etouched and s tep s carred and d ulled o n t op and u nilaterally r etouched a nd s tep s carred a nd d ulled l ower d own. N o .
1 402
( Figure
1 0p) .
P latform
b ilaterally r etouched a nd d ulled;
i ntact ;
whole
r ight
l ateral
e dge
whole l eft l ateral e dge i nversely
r etouched a nd d ulled. N o. 1 296 ( Figure 1 0r).
P latform b roken o ff; whole r ight l ateral
a nd u pper l eft l ateral e dges u nilaterally r etouched , s tep-scarred a nd d ull ; d istal e nd u nilaterally d amaged a nd d ulled ; l ower l eft l ateral e dge u nilaterally d amaged a nd d ull. ( Figure
1 0s).
c ompletely
No .
1 665
r etouched,
s tep
P latform
b ilaterally
s tep-scarred a nd d ulled.
s carred,
i ntact;
a nd
b oth
d ulled;
l ateral
l eft
d istal
e dges e dge
N o . 1 269 ( Figure 1 00 . C annot d efinitely i dentify p latform ; r ight l ateral u nilaterally r etouched , s tep s carred a nd d ull ; b roken d istal i s b ilaterally d amaged,
e dge f resh.
1 44
No.
1 978
( Figure
1 0v).
P latform b roken o ff;
l ow
r ight
r etouched , s tep s carred a nd d ull; p oint f resh ; l ower l eft a djacent t o p oint i s b ilaterally s tep s carred a nd d ulled.
l ateral
l ateral
e dge
No. 1 933 ( Figure 1 0w) . C annot i dentify p latform; d istal e nd a nd l ateral e dge a re b oth unilaterally r etouched, s tep s carred a nd
l eft
d ulled. No. 1 251 ( Figure 1 0x). P latform i ntact; r ight l ateral e dge i s u nilaterally r etouched a nd v ery s harp ; l ower l eft l ateral-distal c orner h as u nilateral s tep s cars a nd i s d ulled ( graver). N o . 2 070 ( Figure 1 0y) . C annot i dentify p latform ; t hree s ides a re i nversely r etouched, s tep s carred a nd d ulled; l eft l ateral-proximal c orner h as u nilateral s tep s cars a nd r etouch, a nd i s p olished-dull. No.
1 876
( Figure 1 0z) .
P latform i ntact;
whole
l eft
l ateral i s
u nilaterally r etouched a nd s tep s carred a nd u sed. No .
2 029
( Figure 1 0aa).
r etouched a nd s tep s carred,
P latform a nd d istal e nds u nilaterally
d ull.
No . 1 278 ( Figure l Obb).
P latform a nd d istal e nd r etouched away;
d istal e nd i s s tep s carred a nd d ulled; d amaged ; t he s horter o ne i s v ery s harp; No. 1 241 ( Figure l Occ).
l ateral e dges a re b ilaterally t he l onger i s u sed-dulled.
P latform a nd d istal e nd r etouched away;
s tep s carred a nd d ulled; l onger l ateral e dge i s b ilaterally d amaged, u sed. No.
1 977
r etouched; No.
1 003
r etouched,
a nd
( Figure
l Odd).
P latform
i ntact;
a ll
t hree
s ides
P latform
i ntact;
a ll
t hree
s ides
v ery s harp e dges. ( Figure
1 0ee).
s tep s carred a nd u se-dulled.
No. 2 023 ( Figure 1 0ff). C annot i dentify p latform; r ight l ateral d istal u nilaterally r etouched , a nd u sed-polished ; l eft l ateral i s
b ilaterally s tep-scarred a nd u sed. No. 2 035 ( Figure l Ogg). i s s tep s carred , b ilaterally d amaged a nd u sed. N o .
1 877
r etouched,
( Figure
s tep
1 0hh) .
s carred
a nd
C annot i dentify p latform; r ight l ateral r etouched a nd u se-dulled ;
P latform
i ntact,
u se-dulled;
r ight
l eft
l eft
l ateral i s
l ateral
l ateral
i nversely
p rojection
u nilaterally u se-damaged. No .
1 276
( Figure 1 0jj).
P latform r etouched a way;
l eft l ateral e dge u nilaterally r etouched, r ight
s tep
p latform a nd
s carred
a nd d ulled;
l ateral e dge p rojection s craper d amaged.
No. 2 001 ( Figure 1 0kk). P latform i ntact; r ight l ateral e dge a nd d istal e nd unilaterally ( from o pposite d irections) r etouched, p oint ( broken)
u nused ;
l eft
l ateral
u nilaterally
1 45
r etouched
a nd
s craper
u se-
dulled. No. 2005 (Fig ure 1011) . Cannot ident if y platform; right lateral edge and distal end step scarred and retouched, use-dulled; point unused. No. 1388 (Fig ure 10mm). Platform broken off; right lateral and distal unilaterally retouched and edges used; medial spine rounded and worn; point broken; left lateral edge is laterally damaged and used. No. 1884 (Figure lOnn). Platform intact; distal end unilaterally retouched - point and right lateral edge indeterminate beca use of cortex; left lateral unilaterally retouched, edge fresh . No. 1292 (Figure !Opp). Platform intact, unilateral retouch, edges used, point is unused.
146
all left lateral
S ummary o f R etouched P ieces, V lasac I II There were 5 2 u sed a rtifacts which were p ossibly, b ut n ot d efinitely, r etouched . Among t hese, o ne p robable f lake was a p ieces e squillges, a nd o ne b lade was u sed a s a r eamer . O nly t wo a rtifacts h ad s imple , b ilaterally d amaged e dges . Twenty-one h ad s imple u nilateral d amage, a nd t he r est were u nilateral e dge d amage.
c omplex
t ools
with
b oth
b ilateral
a nd
T he t hree r etouched p ieces o f u sed s hatter i ncluded t wo s crapers a nd a g raver . T he s ix r etouched p robable f lakes i ncluded s craper d amage , t wo r eamers, a n otch , a nd o ne a rtifact w ith t wo n otches a nd a r eamer . T here w ere 4 6 r etouched u sed f lakes . T hirty-one o f t hese h ad o nly s imple unilateral u se d amage, a nd i ncluded t wo r eamers, f our n otches, a c omposite r eamer-graver, a nd o ne d rill/graver. The 1 3 c omplex t ools i ncluded o ne n otch , o ne p iercer , a nd o ne c omposite n otchs hredder. The 2 1 r etouched u sed b lades i ncluded s even with s imple u nilateral u se-damage. O ne e dge o f o ne o f t hese w as a r eamer . Among t he 1 4 c omplex t ools t here were t wo n otches. N ine r etouched u sed f lake/blades i ncluded f ive with j ust s imple u nilateral u se-damage, i ncluding t wo n otches. T he f ormally s haped t ools i ncluded f ive m icrotools, s ix p ossible m icrotools, a s hredder, f our r ound s crapers, t hree p ossible p oints, s even d rill/graver/piercers, a nd f ive e xtensively r etouched b lades, o ne o f which h as b ilateral e dge d amage t o a n unretouched e dge, and c ould e asily h ave b een p art
o f a c omposite t ool.
S ummary o f T he V lasac I II C hipped S tone The b reakdown o f c ategories s ummarized i n T able 4 4.
o f
c hipped s tone f or V lasac I II i s
The p rimary p urpose o f r etouch i n V lasac I II r emained t he p reparing a nd r epairing o f e dges f or s craper u tilization . 3 0 .8% o f a ll u sed a rtifacts were r etouched. R etouch was s econdarily u sed i n t he s haping o f f ormal s haped t ools. O f 2 11,
t he 3 61
o r 5 8 .4% ,
t ools .
2 9 .7%
u nretouched w ere u sed .
o f
a ll
f lakes, Amongst
r etouched
b lades,
p ieces
w ere
f lake/blades,
t he u nretouched b ut
a nd
u sed
f ormally
s hatter ,
a rtifacts,
t he n atural s hapes o f a n umber o f a rtifacts w ere e xploited f or s pecial u ses: t hree p ieces e squillees, f ive n otches, f our g ravers, t hree d rills and o ne d enticulate. The i ntensity o f u tilization o f unretouched p ieces i s r eflected i n t he n umber o f e dges o n a p iece u tilized b efore d iscard, a nd a lso b y t he u se o f t he t ool f or j ust o ne ( simple) o r m ore t han o ne ( complex) t ask--cutting , s craping , d rilling , e tc. A lmost h alf ( 48.3%) o f a ll u sed f lakes were u sed j ust o nce a nd t hen d iscarded . A bout a t hird ( 32.7%) o f t he b lades w ere u tilized o nce t hen d iscarded.
F lake/blades
f all i n b etween ( 38%).
A much h igher
p ercentage o f t he b lades were c omplex t ools ( 44.0%) t han was t he c ase with f lakes ( 23.5%) o r f lake/blades ( 23.8%) ( See T able 4 5) . T here w ere a t otal o f 9 5 u sed b lades, e xclusive o f f ormally s haped t ools, a nd 2 1 o f t hese ( 22.1%) were r etouched, whereas 2 9.1% o f a ll u sed f lakes a nd 2 2.5% o f f lake/blades w ere r etouched ( See T able 4 6).
1 47
T ABLE 4 4 V LASAC I II C HIPPED S TONE C ATEGORIES C ategory
n o.
U nused s hatter
1 3
2 .3)
U nused p robable f lakes
2 9
) 5 .3)
U nused f lakes
3 3
) 6 .0)
Unused b lades
2 1
) 3 .8)
U nused f lake/blades
2 2
) 4 .0)
P ossibly u sed s hatter
8
P ossibly u sed f lakes
1 2
2 .2
5
0 .9
P ossibly u sed f lake/blades
7
1 .2
U sed s hatter
1 4
2 .5)
U sed p robable f lakes
2 2
) 4 .0)
U sed f lakes
9 3
) 1 7.0)
U sed b lades
6 1
) 1 1.2)
U sed f lake/blades
2 1
P ossibly r etouched u sed p robable f lakes
1 0
1 .8) )
P ossibly r etouched u sed f lakes
1 9
3 .4)
P ossibly r etouched u sed b lades
1 3
) 2 .3)
P ossibly r etouched u sed f lake/blades
1 0
) 1 .8)
R etouched u sed p robable f lakes
0 .5)
6
) 1 .1)
4 6
R etouched u sed b lades
2 1
R etouched u sed f lake/blades
9
R etouched s haped t ools
3 6 T otal
1 48
) 3 .8) )
3
R etouched u sed f lakes
5 43
( 21.7%)
1 .4
P ossibly u sed b lades
R etouched u sed s hatter
1 18 u nused
) ? ) ) 3 .8) ) 1 .6) ) 6 .6)
2 63 u sed ( 48.4%)
1 21 r etouched ( 22.2%)
T ABLE 4 5 V LASAC I II A RTIFACT C ATEGORIES A ND P ATTERNS O F U SE
N o.
o f E dge A reas
F lakes ( 93)
B lades (61)
U sed
n o.
%
( 1
4 5
4 8.3
( 2
2 5
2 6.8
n o.
F lake/Blades (21) %
n o.
%
2 0
3 2.7
8
3 8.0
1 3
2 1.3
6
2 8.5
1
1 .6
2
9.5
9
1 4.7
5
2 3.8
S imple ( 3
1
1 .0
( 4
1
1 .0
( 2
C omplex
1 7
1 9.3
( 3
2
2 .1
( 4
2
2 .1
( 6
1 49
1 5
2 4.5
1
1 .6
1
1 .6
T ABLE
4 6
V LASAC I II F REQUENCY O F R ETOUCH
U sed F lakes ( 158)
U sed B lades ( 95)
J ust U sed
9 3
5 8.8
6 1
6 4.2
2 1
5 2.5
P ossibly R etouched
1 9
1 2.0
1 3
1 3.6
1 0
2 5.0
R etouched
4 6
2 9.1
2 1
2 2.1
1 58
U sed F lake/Blades ( 40) % _
2 2.5
9
9 5
4 0
T ABLE 4 7 V LASAC I II I NTENSITY O F A RTIFACT U TILIZATION
F lakes N o.
B lades N o.
U nused
3 3
1 9.1
2 1
2 0.3
2 2
4 2.3
U sed
9 3
5 4.0
6 1
5 9.2
2 1
4 0.3
R etouched a nd U sed
4 6
2 6.7
2 1
2 0.3
1 72
1 03
F lake/Blades N o.
9 5 2
1 50
1 7.3
This
i s a r eversal o f t he p attern o f g reater i ntensity o f b lade
u se n oted a bove . A h igher p ercentage o f f lakes t han b lades i s b eing s econdarily w orked . I f w e e xpand t his c onsideration t o l ook a t u nused f lakes, b lades, a nd f lake/blades, i t c an b e s een t hat a bout t he s ame p ercentage o f f lakes a nd b lades a re b eing u sed ( 80%) , b ut t hat a h igher p ercentage
o f
f lakes
a re
r etouched .
T he
f lake/blades
s tand
o ut
w ith a
v ery h igh p ercentage n ot u sed a t a ll ( 42.3%) ( See T able 4 7). d etailed d escription o f a rtifacts, s ee P rinz, 1 982, p p.256-278).
( For
V lasac I V V lasac I V material c ontained f our p ieces o f u nused s hatter, t wo u nused f lakes, t hree u nused b lades, a nd o ne u nused f lake/blade . Two o f t he n ine u sed f lakes h ad b ilateral c utting-use d amage o n o ne o r t wo u sed e dges . T hree f lakes h ad u nilateral s craper d amage o n e dges. T here w ere f our c omplex t ools, i ncluding o ne n otch.
o ne
o r
t wo
T here were s ix u sed b lades i n t he V lasac I V materials. F ive h ad b ilateral c utting-use d amage t o o ne e dge, t he s ixth w as a c omplex t ool. Two f lakes a nd t hree b lades were r etouched a nd b ore u nilateral s craper-use d amage. R etouched,
S haped T ools
( 6)
S ix a rtifacts, t wo f lakes a nd f our b lades, w ere r etouched e xtensively f or p urposes b eyond ( re)sharpening a nd e dge s trengthening. No. 9 28 ( Figure 1 1a). T he s triking p latform a nd c urving r ight l ateral h ave b een r etouched i nto a s mooth a rc ; t his s emi-circular e dge i s a lso u nilaterally s tep-scarred a nd q uite d ull; t he c urving l eft l ateral h as a lso b een r etouched f rom t he o pposite f ace a nd i s a lso s tep s carred a nd q uite d ulled. No. 1 639 ( Figure 1 1b). T he p latform i s p resent a nd u nmodified; b ilateral e dges a nd d istal e nd c ontinuously u nilaterally r etouched a nd s tep s carred a nd v ery d ull. No.
( Figure 1 1c).
1 645
P latform h as b een b roken o ff,
r ight l ateral e dge i s u nilaterally r etouched a nd s tep l eft l ateral e dge i s a lso u nilaterally u se -d amaged. N o .
1 646
( Figure
1 1d) .
T he
p latform
i s
p resent;
t he whole
s carred
t he
a nd
e ntire
t he
r ight
l ateral e dge a nd
d istal e nd a re u nilaterally
r etouched a nd s tep s carred
a nd
d ulled ;
l ower
a lso
b ut
i s q uite s harp. No.
t he
1 652
( Figure
l eft
1 1e).
l ateral
T he
e dge
i s
p latform
h as
r etouched
b een
( inversely)
b roken o ff,
t he
d istal t ip i s s lightly u nilaterally d amaged a nd t he u pper 2 /3 o f t he l eft
l ateral N o .
t he
1 643
r ight
i s
i nversely
r etouched a nd u sed.
( Figure 1 1 0 .
l ateral
e dge
T he p latform i s p resent;
i s u nilaterally r etouched,
u sed.
1 51
t he m iddle 3 /4
o f
s tep s carred a nd
T he f our r etouched b lades a re a ll l ikely u se i n c omposite t ools.
1 52
t o h ave b een i ntended f or
a . n o .928
b .
n o.1639
c . n o .1645
d .
n o.1646
f .
n o.1643
e9 e . n o .1652
0
jcm
F igure 1 1:
1
S haped T ools 1 53
2
f rom V lasac I V
S ummary o f V lasac I V C hipped S tone T he b reakdown o f t he V lasac I V c hipped s tone i nto c ategories i s s ummarized i n T able 4 8. R egrettably t hese s ubtotals a re t oo s mall f or c omparisons t o b e m ade b etween t he u tilization a nd r etouching o f f lakes a nd b lades o r t he i ntensity o f u tilization o f i ndividual p ieces . ( For d etailed a rtifact d escriptions, s ee P rinz, 1 982, p p.288-291). V LASAC 0 Twenty-nine p ieces o f c hipped s tone, 5 c ores a nd 3 1 c ore f ragments, c ould n ot b e r eliably a ssigned t o a ny o f t he f our p hases o f t he s ite . T here w as o ne u nused l imestone f lake . O ne q uartz f lake m ay h ave b een u sed. T here were f ive u sed f lakes, f our o f which h ad b een u sed f or c utting t ools ( bilateral e dge d amage). T he f ifth h ad t hree unilaterally d amaged e dges a nd a b ilateral d amaged p oint ( drill). T here w ere t hree f lake/blades, t wo o f w hich h ad o nly u nilateral d amage . T he t hird h ad b oth u nilaterally a nd b ilaterally d amaged e dges ( complex t ool). There was o ne b ilaterally d amaged u sed b lade and o ne b ilaterally a nd u nilaterally d amaged u sed b lade. Two a rtifacts, a b lade r etouched, a nd w ere u sed.
a nd
a b roken
f lake,
may
h ave
b een
F ive f lakes a nd o ne b lade were u sed a nd r etouched. F our o f t he f lakes h ad o nly unilateral d amage, t he f ifth f lake h ad b ilateral a s w ell a s u nilateral d amage, a s d id t he b lade. E ight p ieces w ere f ormally s haped t ools,
a s f ollows:
N o. 1 979 ( Figure 1 2a). P latform i ntact; t op r etouch a long l ower 3 /4 o f r ight l ateral e dge; g rave 3 3-34, p robably V lasac I . N o.
1 948 ( Figure 1 2b).
P latform b roken o ff;
i nverse r etouch o n
u pper 2 /3 o f r ight l ateral , t op r etouched o n r emainder ; p oint u nused ; b ilateral f lake d amage t o l eft d istal-lower l eft l ateral; a ll l eft l ateral t op r etouched; f rom t he b ank o f h earth 2 ; p robably V lasac I I. N o. 1 871 f laked ,
( Figure 1 2c).
p ossibly
P latform i ntact; u pper r ight l ateral t op
r etouched a nd
s tep
s carred
a nd
d ull ;
r ight
d istal
( to
p oint) i s i nversely r etouched a nd s tep s carred a nd l eft d istal ( to p oint) i s t op r etouched a nd s tep s carred a nd d ull -p olished; l ower p rotruding a rea o f l eft l ateral i s i nversely s tep s carred a nd d ull. No. 1 904 ( Figure 1 2d). P latform i ntact; l ower r ight l ateral i s b ilaterally f lake d amaged ; p oint u nused ; w hole d istal ( point t o p oint) i s t op r etouched , s tep s carred a nd d ull ; l eft l ateral i s i nversely s tep s carred,
e dge u sed.
No . 1 969 ( Figure 1 2e). l aterals a re t op r etouched; a djacent
t o p oint a re d uller
P latform i ntact; l ower r ight a nd l eft p oint i s p olished, e dges immediately ( graver);
1 54
g rave 1 4,
p robably V lasac I II.
T ABLE 4 8 V LASAC I V C HIPPED S TONE C ATEGORIES
U nused s hatter
4 )
U nused f lakes
) 2 )
U nused b lades
) 3 )
U nused f lake/blades
) 1 )
P ossibly u sed p ieces
2
U sed b lades
6 )
U sed f lakes
) 9 )
R etouched u sed f lakes
2 )
R etouched u sed b lades
) 3 )
R etouched s haped t ools
) 6 )
T otal
1 55
3 8
1 0 u nused
1 5 u sed
1 1
r etouched
a . n o .1979
b . n o.1948
d . n o.1904
e . n o.1969
h . n o .1936
g . n o.1966
0 j
F igure 1 2:
c m
S haped T ools
1
2
1
f rom V lasac 1 56
( unprovenanced)
No. 1 905 ( Figure 1 2 0. t op f lake d amaged a nd u sed ; a nd u sed.
P latform i ntact; l ower r ight l ateral i s u pper l eft l ateral i s i nversely r etouched
No. 1 966 ( Figure 1 2g). P latform i ntact, whole r ight l ateral p ossibly t op r etouched, s tep s carred a nd u sed -d ull; l ower l eft l ateral i s i nversely r etouched, s tep s carred a nd p olished; g rave 1 4, p robably V lasac I II. N o .
1 936
( Figure
1 2h) .
N o p latform c an b e
i dentified;
u pper r ight
l ateral i s i nversely r etouched, s tep s carred a nd d ull; r emainder o f r ight l ateral i s t op r etouched, s tep s carred a nd u sed; s craper.
1 57
T he C hipped S tone I ndustry O f T he P rimary D ata S et: C omparison a nd S ynthesis T hrough t ime t he p ercentage o f p ieces w hich s howed n o u se d amage a t a ll d ecreases f rom 3 0.8% i n V lasac I t o 2 6.0% i n V lasac I I a nd 2 1.7% i n V lasac I II. A t t he s ame t ime, t he p ercentage o f p ieces r etouched i ncreases f rom 1 7% i n V lasac I t o 1 8.7% i n V lasac I I a nd 2 2.2% i n V lasac I II. r epresent t otal o f a nalysis o f h ad r emoved a ll
I t must b e r emembered t hat t hese f igures d o n ot c hipped s tone u tilization a t t he s ite , b ut t he r esults m aterials f rom w hich t he e xcavators b elieved t hat t hey d ebitage . A ssuming t hat t he s ame a ttention t o s orting
was a pplied t hroughout, we c an s ay f or t he whole s ite t hat t he u se o f r etouch o n f lint i ncreased t hrough t ime , a nd p robably a lso t hat t he u se o f u nmodified f lakes i ncreased i n i ntensity t hrough t ime. T his o ccurred o f c ourse, i n t he c ontext o f a g rowing r atio o f q uartz t o f lint t hrough t ime ( see b elow). I n a ll t hree o ccupations t he s ame f ormal t ool s hapes h ave b een f ound i n s mall n umbers : n otches, r eamers, g ravers, d rills, p iercers, p ieces e squillees, p oints, d enticulates, s crapers, a nd g eometric m icroliths . A f ew o f t hese were s haped f rom b lanks b y r etouching , b ut t he m ajority s imply e xploited t he n atural s hapes o f f lakes a nd b lades. T he p ercentage o f f ormally s haped t ools, a s d istinguished f rom e dges r einforced o r s harpened b y r etouch i n t he p rimary d ata s et w as l ow i n a ll t hree o ccupations: 4 .8%, 5 .0% , a nd 6 .6% i n V lasac I , I I, a nd I II, r espectively . T he s light i ncrease t hrough t ime i n t hese t ools f its p attern o f i ncreased u se o f r etouching i n g eneral t hrough t ime.
t he
I n V lasac I a nd I I t he e xploitation o f b lades i s m uch m ore i ntense t han t hat o f f lakes. B lades a re l ess l ikely t o b e u sed o nly o nce, o n o ne e dge , a nd t hen d iscarded , t han a re f lakes, a nd t hey a re m ore l ikely t o h ave b een c omplex t ools. A h igher p ercentage o f b lades t han f lakes were u sed , a nd r etouched. I n V lasac I II, b lades c ontinued t o b e m ore i ntensively u sed i n s ome, b ut n ot a ll, r espects. B lades were l ess l ikely t o b e u sed j ust o nce a nd t hen d iscarded , a nd m uch m ore l ikely t o b e c omplex t ools. I n t erms o f o verall u se, a nd r etouch, h owever, t he p attern h as c hanged. About 8 0% o f a ll b lades a nd f lakes were u sed a nd/or r etouched , a nd a h igher p ercentage o f f lakes ( 26.7%) t han b lades ( 20.3%) were r etouched. S ince m ost r etouch i s a ssociated with p reparing/repairing a n e dge f or s craper u tilization, t his s hift p robably r eflects a s hift a way f rom t he u se o f b lades a s s crapers. T he s uggested s hift i n t he p reference f or b lades o r f lakes f or u se i n c ertain t asks may b e l inked t o s hifts i n s ubsistence--different i tems t o b e s craped--or t o s tylistic d rift. E ither way, i t s uggests a nother a venue t o p ursue i n t he s tudy o f t he r elation b etween f orm a nd f unction . T he e xperimental c reation o f a n ew c ategory, " flake/blades" , i s a lso s uggestive . A ny s tone t ool a nalyst w ill i mmediately r ecognize t he r eality o f s uch a c ategory : a h ybrid f lake-blade . T he d istinctive b ehavior o f t his s ub-population o n a n umber o f m easures h as b een i nteresting i n i tself. A dditionally, i t s hould b e o bvious t hat t he d ifferences i n u tilization b etween f lakes a nd b lades w ould h ave b een m uch
l ess
i nclusion
c lear o f
i f
t hey were
f lake/blades
n ot
t otally
with
f lakes,
1 58
o bliterated which
i s
b y
t he
what
a rbitrary
t hey
" are"
a ccording t o c urrent u sage . d istinctive p atterns.
I n a ll t hree o ccupations
t his c ategory h ad
A ll t hree o ccupations a t V lasac were c haracterized b y ac hipped s tone i ndustry which made h eavy u se o f u nmodified f lakes, b lades, f lake/blades , a nd e ven s hatter , f or s pecialized t ools s uch a s n otches, a s well a s more g eneralized c utting a nd s craping f unctions. T he p rimary p urpose o f r etouch was t o s harpen , s trengthen , a nd r esharpen e dges f or u se . A v ery s mall n umber o f p ieces w ere f ormally s haped b y r etouching . I n V lasac I , 2 4, i n V lasac I I, 4 3, a nd i n V lasac I II, 3 6 s uch f ormally s haped t ools w ere f ound . A n a ttempt w as m ade t o s ort o ut a nd i nclude a ll r etouched p ieces i n t he p rimary d ata s et, b ut i n s orting a nd c ounting a bout 2 5,000 p ieces o f c hipped s tone , s ome p ieces were u ndoubtedly m issed . S till, f ormally s haped t ools, u sually e xtensively r etouched , were m issed l ess f requently t han p ieces r etouched o n o ne s hort e dge s ection f or r esharpening. T his l eaves a bout 1 00 s uch f ormal t ools o ut o f 2 5,000 p ieces, c ertainly a s trong c ase f or r ejecting t he a nalysis a nd c ategorization o f whole i ndustries o n t he b asis o f r etouched p ieces a lone ( see a lso V aughan 's ( 1985) a nalysis o f a Magdalenian a ssemblage w here a s ignificant p ercentage o f u nmodified f lakes w ere a lso f ound t o h ave b een u sed).
1 59
T ECHNICAL A NALYSIS Explaining A rtifact V ariation " Artifacts m ay b e i dentical m orphologically, b ut m ade b y e ntirely d ifferent t echniques." ( Crabtree, 1 972, p .3) . I f t his i s t rue, t hen o ne c an e liminate, a t l east t heoretically, i ntended f unction a s a n explanation for t he observed variability i n t echniques o f manufacturing. I n l ooking a t t he c hipped s tone f rom V lasac, t his s ituation o f i deal c ontrol f or i ntended f unction i s r uled o ut, b ecause t he v ast b ulk o f t he c hipped s tone c onsists o f u nretouched b ut u sed f lakes, which a re n ever g oing t o b e " identical m orphologically ." F ish ( n.d., p . 7 ) has s uggested t hat i n t he r eal world o f a rtifact a nalysis i t i s impossible t o i solate f unctional, s tylistic o r t echnological a ttributes, q uoting S okal a nd S neath 's ( 1963) n exus h ypothesis: " every m orphological t rait i s i nfluenced b y m ore t han o ne c ausal f actor a nd l ikewise m ost c ausal f actors a ffect m ore t han o ne m orphological t rait ." S ackett ( 1977, 1 982) , i n d iscussing s tyle i n a rtifact a nalysis , a rgues t hat " style i s t he p erfect c omplement o f f unction" ( p. 3 70), t hat t he t wo t ogether d etermine v ariability among a rtifacts . H e r ecognizes b oth u tilitarian ( container) a nd n on-utilitarian ( badge o f o ffice) f unctions ( ibid, p . 3 72) a nd f urther s uggests t hat a rtifacts h ave p rimary d omains, e ither f unctional o r s tylistic , a nd s econdary d omains ( ibid , p . 3 73) : t he p rimary d omain o f ap ot i s f unctional, u tilitarian , i ts a djunct f orm , o r s econdary d omain , i s i ts o rnamentation , which i s n onu tilitarian. T here a re a n umber o f p roblems w ith S ackett 's m odel . I n t he f irst p lace , t here a re o ther s ources o f v ariation i n a ddition t o f unction a nd s tyle. S peth ( 1972, p .34) s uggests a m inimum o f f our: f unction, s tyle, t echnology, i ntended f unction, t raditional ( stylistic) p reference , i deological c onsiderations a nd r andom v ariability . N either a uthor b others t o d efine " technology" , which m ight b e t aken t o i nclude available r aw material, known t echnological s olutions t o a g iven t echnological p roblem ( i.e" t he r ange o f c hoices available), o r t he g iven ( traditional) means o f p roducing t he " blank" which i s t hen e mbellished w ith f unctional a nd s tylistic a ttributes : t he b lank f lake which i s
r etouched
i nto a s pecific
t ype o f p oint,
o r t he b lank p ot
which i s t hen p ainted t o " look p retty" , i ndicate what i t i s t o c ontain , who o wns i t, w ho m ade i t . E ven a s eemingly s traightforward i ssue l ike r aw m aterial c an b e v iewed i n s everal w ays a nd i nfluenced b y s everal f actors. The r aw material u sed t o m ake a p ot c onstrains i ts f orm, l imiting t he t hinness o f t he walls, f or e xample. B ut which r aw material i s u sed t o make a g iven p ot c an b e r elated t o i ts f unction : s torage j ars n eed t o b e s trong , s o c oarse t emper a nd c lay w ith l ots o f i nclusions i s s elected . C hoice o f r aw m aterial c an a lso b e a m atter o f t radition ( style) : p otters i n a c ertain f amily a lways u se c lay f rom a s pecific s ource b ecause i t " feels" b etter t o t hem, u nless t hey a re making d rinking c ups, f or which t hey p refer a much f iner c lay f or t hinner w alls a nd s moother s urfaces ( the i ntrusion o f f unction) . T here may a lso b e o nly o ne s ource o f c lay, i n which s implest c ase t he p roperties o f t he c lay w ill h ave c ertain d irect l imiting e ffects o n t he f inal f orm o f
t he
Technology
p ot . i s
an
important,
1 60
l egiti mate
a nd
t heoretically
i ndependent
s ource
o f
v ariation i n a rtifacts.
I t
p robably n eeds
t o
b e
d efined f or e very a nalysis i n which i t i s c onsidered . A t t he c ultural l evel t echnology may b e s een a s ac onstant, a nd i nterculturally a s a s ignificant s ource o f v ariation . I t h as b een a rgued t hat m anufacturing t echnology i s m ore u seful t han t ypology ( shape) o r f unction ( use) a s a means f or i dentifying c ulture g roups ( Young a nd B onnichsen , 1 985, p .111) . A t V lasac , f or e xample, t he c hoice o f r aw m aterial f or m aking s tone t ools p robably i nvolved b oth f unctional c onsiderations a nd t raditional o nes ( see , f or e xample, v ariation i n c olor o f c hipped s tone d iscussed b elow: S quare 5 23). T hese s ources o f v ariation s hould b e c onsidered s eparately f rom t he i ssue o f t he c onstraints s ubsequently p laced o n k napping b y t he m aterials which were c hosen ( a t echnological a ttribute). C lose a lso s uggests " ideological c onsiderations" a s a n i ndependent s ource o f v ariation . T o c onsider t his s uggestion , i t i s f irst n ecessary t o d efine what i s meant b y " style" . C lose h erself s ays ( 1978, p .223) t hat t he n otion o f s tyle i s b ased o n t he i dea t hat t here a re s everal m ethods o f a rriving a t a d esired e nd p oint . T he c hoice o f method c onstitutes t he s tyle, where c hoice i s a ssumed t o b e l argely d etermined b y t he s ocio-cultural c ontext, o r t radition . Implicit i n t his d efinition i s t he a ssumption t hat f unction i s p rimary, a nd t hat s tyle o perates o nly within t he c onstraints s et b y f unctional r equirements. B ut t o t he e xtent t hat s ubsistence s ystems a re i nfluenced b y t radition a nd p reference, r equirements a re i n f act d efined b y " style" .
i .e.
" style" ,
f unctional
S ackett's ( 1977, 1 982) c haracterization o f s tyle i s l ess p recise a nd l ess i nclusive t han C lose's. F or S ackett, s tyle . . " concerns a h ighly s pecific a nd c haracteristic manner o f d oing s omething, which manner i s a lways p eculiar t o a s pecific t ime a nd p lace" . B inford ( 1973, p .243) a nd W ilmsen ( 1974, p .108) e xpect m ore s ocial o r s tylistic i nput i n more h ighly v alued a nd/or e laborately s haped ( retouched) t ools.
T his
c ould
b e
b ecause
" curated"
t ools
a re
c onsciously
( or
u nconsciously) u sed a s s ymbols o f s ocial i dentity , b ecause m ore s teps i n t he m anufacturing p rocess l ogically p rovide m ore o pportunities f or " choices" o f method t o b e made, o r p erhaps b ecause r etouch a nd e laborate s haping a re s omehow m ore a ppropriate t o t he n otion o f s tyle t han i s s triking p latform p reparation . The f irst i dea, t hat c urated t ools a re u sed a s s ymbols o f s ocial i dentity, o f c ourse o nce a gain c onfounds s tyle a nd f unction . T he s econd s uggestion , t hat m ore s teps p rövide m ore o pportunities f or " choices" o r e xpressions o f s tyle , s eems l ogical, b ut d oes n ot r educe t he e xpectation t hat e xpressions o f t radition-based " choices" o r s tyle, t hough f ewer i n n umber p er i ndividual a rtifact, will a lso b e f ound i n s impler a nd c ommoner artifacts. The t hird i dea, t hat " style" s omehow s eems more a ppropriately a pplicable t o e laborate r e-shaping a nd e sthetically p leasing a rtifacts, a nd , s imilarly , t hat s triking p latform p reparation i s s imply a n a spect o f t echnology, i s s imply e thnocentric. T he d ichotomizing o f a rt a nd l ife c an b e s een i n t he W estern n otion o f t he f ine a rts v s . c rafts , o r t hose a rt works which h ave p otential p ractical u se s uch a s c eramics, r ugs, q uilts, v s. p ainting a nd s culpture. B ut t here i s n o r eason t o s uspect t hat t his d ichotomy i s r elevant c ross c ulturally.
1 61
I t s hould b e c lear b y n ow t hat c onfusion , i mplicit a nd e xplicit, p ervades t he writings o f a rcheologists o n t he n otion o f s tyle. T he solution i s t o r eturn t o t he b eginning: what questions d o a rcheologists h ope t o a nswer b y i dentifying s tyles i n p rehistoric a rtifacts? I f t he a nswer i s g enerally, a s i t i s with C lose, ( 1978, 1 979) t he i dentification o f s ocial-cultural e ntities, o r t heir b oundaries i n p rehistory, t hen t hat p urpose c an b e u sed t o s ort o ut a n umber o f t he p roblems w hich h ave b een r aised h ere. C lose 's " ideological c onsiderations" , i n t he l ight o f a nalysis f or t he s ake o f i dentification o f c ultural b oundaries, a re n ot a rguably s eparate f rom o ther a spects o f s tyle . I deological c onsiderations, o r b eliefs a nd p ractices b ased o n r eligion , a re c ertainly p art o f t he t radition , o r s ocio-cultural p ackage w hich e ach i ndividual m ore o r l ess a bsorbs a nd p erpetuates. I s i t n ecessary o r c orrect t o a ssume t hat f unction t akes p rimacy o ver s tyle? F or s tyle, o ne c ould s ubstitute h istory, a nd t hen i t b ecomes e asier t o s ee t hat t he p rimary r esponse o f a ny s ociety t o e nvironmental s tress will n ot d epend o n t he n ature o f t he s tress t o t he exclusion o f t he n ature o f t he s ociety. T he t wo a re a lways i nterr elated, b ut t his s hould n ot d efeat t he p urpose o f s tyle a nalysis i f s tyle=culture . I f s tyle i s a p ackage o f t raditions c haracteristic o f a s ingle c ulture t he s ame c ulture will m eet v arying f unctional n eeds w ith t he s ame s tyle o f s olutions, a nd t wo d ifferent c ultures w ill m eet t he s ame f unctional n eeds with t heir d ifferent s tyles o f s olutions. A t l east t heoretically , t hen , i f s tyles c an b e i dentified , v ariations i n f unction s hould n ot o bscure t heir r ecognition. G oing b ack t o t he l evel o f d ata, a nd d ata a nalysis, C lose ( 19781 979) p resents a m ethod o f a nalysis which s eems q uite r easonable . A t t he a ttribute l evel , s he m akes s ome a ssumptions a bout what a ttributes a re p rimarily f unctional : f or e xample , r etouching o ne e nd o f a b lade t o a p oint, a nd b lunting t he o pposite e nd w ith s teep r etouch w ould b e a ssumed t o b e p rimarily f unctional a lterations. T he c hoice a s t o whether t he d istal o r p roximal e nd i s t o b e p ointed m ight well b e s tylistic . I f t he e nd c hosen f or p ointing c orrelates h ighly w ith s ome o ther a ttribute a ssumed t o b e p rimarily f unctional , t hen C lose s uggests t hat t he c hoice o f e nd i s p rimarily f unctional t oo. F or e xample, i f a ll o f t he r etouched p ieces with p ointed p roximal e nds were o ver 1 .5 cms. l ong , a nd t he p ieces with p ointed d istal e nds were l ess t han 1 .5 ems. l ong, a p rimarily f unctional i nterpretation i s s uggested. I f t here a re n o s ignificant c orrelations b etween e nd c hosen f or p ointing and p resumed f unctional a ttributes, t hen t he c ase f or t he i nterpretation o f t his a ttribute a s a p rimarily s tylistic o ne i s s trengthened. C lose
( 1979,
p .9,
q uoting L ubell ,
1 971)
s uggests
t hat
r esemblances
i n p rimary t echnology p robably r esult f rom s ocio-cultural a ffinities, . ."since p rimary t echnology i ncludes p atterns o f b ehavior l earned i n a s ocial c ontext, i t i s v ery u nlikely t hat i t s hould n ot h ave s tylistic a spects..." S tothert's r esearch a ffirms t his o pinion : " technolog i cally s imple s toneworking i s c ulturally p atterned" ( 1974, p .303). T raditional
t ypological
a nalysis
w ould
n ot
b e
v ery
f ruitful
o n a s ite
l ike V lasac which h as a t iny n umber o f f ormal " tools" ( 103) amidst a
1 62
v ery l arge q uantity o f c hipped s tone ( 25,000 p ieces). B esides, a s C lose a sks ( 1979, p .232) : What d oes t ypology mean? A s s he s ays, t he r esults o f t ypological a nalysis " are n ot r eadily i nterpretable" ( see also S ackett, 1 978). Meltzer ( 1981, p .313) s uggests: ••• morphological t ypes a llow u s t o a ssume o nly t hat s ome f orm o f s elective b ehavior i s t aking p lace. They s elective b ehavior m ight b e" .
make
n o
a llowance
f or
what
t hat
I n t he a nalysis w hich f ollows, t he d ata w ill b e e xamined i n t erms o f a ttributes which r eflect t echnology. They h ave b een e xamined i n f ormal a nd f unctional t erms a bove. This d ivision i s a s much a n a rtifact o f t he s ystem o f d ata c ollection a s i t i s a r eflection o f models o f t he e xplanation o f v ariability i n c hipped s tone . S tyle w ill b e c onsidered h ere i n c onjunction with t echnology , a s i t was w ith f orm and f unction, r eflecting t he o peration o f t he n exus h ypothesis. Any s ystem o f p artitioning t he a nalysis i mposes a rbitrary s tructure o n t he d ata, b ut i t i s i mpossible t o d eal with a ll s ources o f v ariation s imultaneously i n a ny m eaningful ,
o rganized o r i ntelligent way .
T echnological A ttributes T he a ttributes d iscussed h ere a re : r aw m aterial, t runcation ( deliberate), c ortex , h eat t reatment,
b ulb , l ip,
p latform , p latform
c rushing , p latform f acets, n umber o f s urfaces, n umber o f r emovals, t he e dge a ngles, p latform l ength a nd width , twisting a nd t hickness -a s e xplained i n t he a ttribute l ist a bove . L ength a nd w idth o f f lakes i s a lso d iscussed : t hese were c alculated f rom t he p olar c oordinate d ata . L ength was d efined a s t he p olar c oordinate r eading a t 1 80 ° p lus . the nd width was d efined a s t he r eading a t 9 0° p lus t he r eading o f 3 60 ° , a r eading a t 2 70 ° . R aw 4 9 a nd i n F igure 1 5. T he
f requency
d ata
o n t hese a ttributes a re s ummarized i n T able
d istributions
o f
3 o f
t he a ttributes
i n T able 4 9 d o
n ot c hange t hrough t ime ( but a ssociation with o ther v ariables may). The f irst o f t hese i s t he n umber o f r emovals ( or f lake s cars) o n t he e xterior s urface . T he r ange o f v alues f or t his a ttribute was z ero t o n ineteen . A n a rtifact with a z ero c ode f or t he a ttribute would b e c ompletely c overed w ith c ortex o n i ts v entral s urface . T he m ean v alue f or t he a ttribute was r oughly t he s ame f or V lasac I , I I a nd I II: 4 .1 t o 4 .3 r emovals . F or t he s mall S tarcevo s ample t he m ean d rops t o 3 .5. B ecause o f t he s mall s ample s ize, i t i s d ifficult t o c laim t hat t his d rop r eflects a s ignificant c hange i n manufacturing t echniques o r s tyle . F or a ll t hree o f t he M esolithic o ccupations, f lakes with t wo o r l ess n egative r emoval s cars o n t heir v entral s urfaces a ccount f or 1 6 t o 1 8 p ercent o f a ll m aterial . F or t he S tarcevo m aterial , t his f igure i s 2 3% .
I n a ddition ,
3 0-35% o f a ll f lakes h ave s ome c ortex o n t hem .
( 26%
f or S tarcevo). This i ndicates t hat p rimary f laking o f n odules, t he f irst s tep i n t he k napping p rocess, was g oing o n i n t he l iving s ite i n a ll o ccupation p hases. The n umber o f f lake s cars o r f acets c ounted o n t he r emnant o f s triking p latform a ttached t o t he f lake s hows n o v ariation t hrough t ime.
T he mean n umber o f f acets p er a rtifact
l evels o f V lasac
( see T able 4 9).
1 63
i s
1 .3 t o 1 .4 f or a ll
00
CO
C r )
0
1 -1 C r ) Cr )
i n
i n
0 1 i n
ON C r )
Cr )
4 4CV V )
C ) c o C U
Cr)
V hD
Ch
Cr)
C V
. es s.
0 0
40 / 1
/ 4 1 . 0 Or )
C . ) C U C / )
0
/ 4 1 . 0 CV 1 /0 4
r ss.
C r ) i r ) / 40 1 c r ) 1 40 / • ( r )
C U
v I
40 / 1
ON C r )
C r )
CO
h.
0
C V
OD
r
O -I
O c g C / 4 1 . 0cn
r ",
0
.4-
• r •
CO
V)
CV
C . )
C U
C O C U
40 / 1
0 c e ) i nh .
c o — I
•
c \ 1
c \ I C O ce )
CO C r )
I . r )
40 / 1
4 / 10 )
. • • -• ,
( D in c -N 1 — 1 CV
4 ' 01 C r )
C r )
r I r I
4 / 4 W
W
W
0 . ) 4 )
. 0 U
C I )
0
0
0
4 1
4 . )
u )
U
U )
0
4 4
9 1
-0
3 4
ß 4
U ) W
I Z T ' L I 4
4 . 4 C Y )
4 1 9 4 C l ) I 4
C l j U l
I ) 0
4 ) .
c O
Material
C . )
0 CO CV
C r ) O N
4 1 / 4 0
4 4 CV
4 . ) C D
0 ) U ) C ‘ )
4 2 1
P C 1
CV 4 4 Cr l
c • 1
C U
c i ) C V
0,4
u ncertain
0
D eliberate
c o
0
u ncertain
0
T runcation
0 0
O CN
u ncertain
V lasac I
O
P latform
z r
CD CN
A TTRIBUTE
D ATA S ET*
. -1
C 7 N C • 1
AI C
v 1
V) / 10 4 • , 11 1
4 J 0
00
c r N
m
% . c )
u I r I
c N I
s e "
4 1 . 0 /
4 ' N / 4 1 . 0 H
H
el
cN el v . ) c e )
c o
1 1
V lasac I I
v z,
L r l
C • 1
% C )
C • 1 CO 00
h.
0-i el c • 1 1
c N I
0
0
0
cn
• 4
/ 1 4 . 0
Ni 00
0
—1
4. / 1 0
› :e I 4- 4
VD el u l
4. / 1 0
C . ) C U C U 4 1
el c N I
f ire-crazed
0
A TTRIBUTE
T ABLE 4 9
• r • Ln
c • I CO c • N I C N I
40 / 1
c • I
0
(
Cl
4 1 0
C l ) 4 )
• 0 c0 Z 4 1
Lr 1
L r l
— 4
CO
c : 7 \
0
Cr )
c h
Cr ) I
i n 0 0 VD C r ) 0
CI
t r )
-1
e q
C )
C O C 1 3 C o 4 1
• 0
N -0 Cr ) -t 4
oo
L e l In
C o U 3 C O v I
• 0
4 en
c 9
N. 0
i n
v O N . ON c N 1 I n i n H C r ) H i CT I n C V HI
H
H i 0
1 c o C N I
0
M ean = 4 .121
xI
c . 1
HI
1 1
V ) H I C V C • I 0 0 0 1
t 3 ,2
C o C O
0
• 0
( N cN cJ c • J
H e n 0
I n CT N . C r )
0
C O CO C V C O C V C r ) C O 0\ c,1 C O i n i -• ) C g
HI
HI
HI
HI
0
Cr )
c
h . H
H
0
0 0 I f )
HI
Hi
0
0
0
0
V lasac I
H I C V C V
u n C r ) c q
H
0
c o o r-
0
C r ) C V
C O
o
i n
c N i
f ragments
o n c A C r )
4C 1 / ) C ' ) '
i r ) e l O D r .
C V ON C V II 0 r -
C • 1
, In
0 0 C V C r ) •
r emoved.
0
C
0
C I ) X ' CI ) 4 . 3 0 $. 1
A TTRIBUTE
o
4IC O 0
0 C
C r )
N -C O
0
HI
r e l
• • 4
0 . %
T he p ercentage o f p ieces w ith t runcated d istal e nds i s u nchanging t hroughout a ll f our o ccupations, b ut n ot t he p ercentage o f t hose t runcations
which w ere
j udged
t o
b e
d eliberate
r ather
t han a ccidental
b reaks. Only 1 2 t o 1 5% o f a ll f lakes i n e ach p hase were d istally t runcated , a nd o n a verage, a bout h alf o f t hose l ooked d eliberate . T he p ercentage v aries q uite widely f rom 4 8 t o 6 1 p ercent j udged t o b e d eliberately t runcated i n V lasac I , I I, a nd I II, r espectively ( see T able
4 9) .
S imilar
v ariation
i n
t he
p ercentages
o f
r etouched ,
f ormal
t ool t ypes was n ot f ound f or t he t hree p eriods. P urdy ( 1975, p .134) h as d escribed " lateral s nap" o r t he b reaking o ff o f t he d istal e nd d uring k napping . S he h as f ound e xperimentally t hat t his c an b e c aused b y f ailing t o a dequately s upport t he d istal e nd o f t he c ore while k napping . I nadequate s upport h as a lso b een l inked e xperimentally t o c urved b lades ( Crabtree, 1 972, p .12; B ordes a nd C rabtree, 1 969, p .8). An i ncreasing p ercentage o f c urved f lake-blades i s f ound a t V lasac t hrough t ime: 1 0-13-15-28%. Another t hree t o f our p ercent o f t he a rtifacts f rom t he t hree m ain o ccupations a re b oth c urved a nd t wisted o ut o f t he l ength-width p lane . S ix t o e ight p ercent o f t he a rtifacts a re t wisted ( but n ot c urved) . T here a re n o p ublished e xperimental d ata r elating t his a ttribute t o a ny a spect o f t echnology o r material. T wisting a nd c urving a re l ess l ikely t o b e f ound o n f lakes w hich a lso h ave l ips, a lthough t his t rend i s n ot s tatistically s ignificant . T he n egative a ssociation i s l ogical, s ince c urving i s a ssociated with i nadequate d istal s upport o f t he c ore, a nd l ips a re a ssociated with k napping t echniques w hich a re p recise , c ontrolled , a nd n ormally i nvolve d istal b racing ( punch t echnique) o r a t l east imply a n i nterest i n a h igh d egree o f c ontrol o ver t he k napping p rocess, a s i n t he u se o f s oft h ammers . C ontrol o ver t he o utcome i n s oft h ammer p ercussion would a lso b e improved with t he u se o f a d istal b race. T aken t ogether, t hese a ttributes m ight s uggest i ncreasing c asualness o r c areless p roduction o f m uch c hipped s tone . T hese a ttributes a re i mportant c haracteristics o f t he a ssemblage a s a whole , r eflecting what c an b e c alled i ts p rimary c haracter: s haping , t hinning a nd r etouching o f " tools" i n t his a ssemblage a re m inimal . t hen d iscarded . About
o ne-third o f
M ost
f lakes w ere u sed a s
t hey w ere s truck a nd
a ll p ieces h ave c ortex o n t hem i n a ll t hree
M esolithic l evels, w ith a p ossible d ecreasing t rend t hrough t ime ( from 3 5 t o 3 0%) i n u tilization o f p ieces with c ortex ( this will b ecome c learer when t he s econd d ata s et, S quare 5 23, i s a nalyzed a nd we s ee what p ercentage o f u nretouched p ieces a re i n f act u sed). T he p ercentage o f p ieces w ith c ortex v aries f or d ifferent m aterials , a s c an b e s een i n T able 5 0. T here i s a c lear t rend t hrough t ime f or f lint a rtifacts f or a s maller p ercentage t o h ave c ortex . T he p ercentage w ith c ortex f or q uartz p ieces a nd o ther t ypes o f s tone i s e rratic. T he p ercentage o f f lint h aving c ortex f rom t he f inal d ata s et v aries l ittle ( see b elow, a nd T able 5 1) . E ither t hrough t ime t here was a s election a gainst p ieces with c ortex f or u se/retouch a s t ools, o r t he p rimary d ata
s et
d oesn't
r eally
r epresent
what
was
i n
f act
o pposed t o m anufacturing d ebris . T his q uestion w ill a fter e xamination o f t he s econd d ata s et: S quare 5 23. T he h igh p ercentage o f p rimary f laking o f u ntrimmed 1 ) a vailability o f
s mall
t ruly u sed, b e
r aised
a s
a gain
f lakes with c ortex c ertainly r eflects c ores o n t he s ite -a nd m ay a lso r eflect:
n odules;
2 ) g ood
1 67
a vailability
o f
r aw
m aterial
T ABLE 5 0 O CCURRENCE O F C ORTEX O N D IFFERENT M ATERIALS,
P RIMARY D ATA S ET
Q uartz
F lint
V olcanics
S ilicas
%
%
%
%
y es c ortex
y es c ortex
y es c ortex
y es c ortex
V lasac I
2 3.9
3 8.4
2 0.0
2 8.6
V lasac I I
3 9.1
3 7.8
-
14.9
V lasac I II
3 1.7
3 0.6
1 6.7
2 1.7
-
29.4
-
S tarcevo
T ABLE 5 1 O CCURRENCE O F C ORTEX I N F INAL D ATA S ET,
n o.
o f pieces
n o. w ith c ortex
F LINT O NLY
%w ith c ortex
V lasac I
1 391
5 05
3 6.6
V lasac I I
2 764
1 066
3 8.5
V lasac I II
2 301
8 18
3 5.5
2 0
1 0
5 0.0
S tarcevo
1 68
s o t hat f ew c ores were u sed t o e xhaustion; 3 ) p reference f or p ieces with c ortex ( as f or e xample t o s erve a s n atural b acking); 4 ) a c ombination o f t hese f actors. T he v ariation i n q uantities o f m aterial u sed l esson i n d ata manipulation a nd i nterpretation .
o ffers a c autionary I n t his s ample o f
c hipped s tone, which i s s upposed t o r epresent t ools, u sed p ieces a nd c ores, o ne c an s ee t hat t he p ercentage o f q uartz r emains s teady t hrough t ime , a nd t he r elative i mportance o f f lint i ncreases ( Table 5 2) . When o ne c onsiders a ll o f t he c hipped s tone h owever , i t b ecomes c lear t hat q uartz b ecomes m uch more i mportant t hrough t ime, a nd f lint l ess i mportant ( see b elow) . T he n on-representative n ature o f t he s ample i s d ue t o t he g reat d ifficulty f ormal s hape o n q uartz.
i n
s eeing
e ither r etouch,
u se,
o r e ven
O n t he o ther h and , t he d ecreased u tilization t hrough t ime o f o dd m aterials s uch a s l imestone, s ilica a nd v olcanics f ound i n t he e xamination o f t he s ummary d ata s et, i s a lso r eflected i n t he p rimary d ata s et. The
p ercentage
o f
a rtifacts
with
n o
s triking
p latforms,
o r
e specially with q uestionable p latforms, i ncreases t hrough t he f our l evels o f V lasac. T here i s a j ump f rom V lasac I I t o V lasac I II, f rom 2 6% t o 3 4% o f t he a rtifacts l acking p latforms o r c oded a s u ndecided. This g roup o f amorphous artifacts s hows u p i n t he f requency d istribution f or s everal o ther v ariables. P resence o f a l ip o n t he e dge o f t he s triking p latform i s uncoded f or a h igher p ercentage o f V lasac I II t han V lasac I I o r I a rtifacts, b ecause t he i dentification o f a s triking p latform w as u ncertain . O therwise , t he o ccurrence o f l ips v o , where o nly i s q uite u niform i n V lasac I -III, b ut i ncreases i n S tarcg. 5 9% o f t he a rtifacts h ave p latforms a t a ll, b ut 2 6% o f a ll a rtifacts, o r c lose t o 1 /2 o f a ll a rtifacts with p latforms, a lso h ave l ips ( see T able 4 9). P latform e dge
c rushing
i ncreased
f rom 4 4
t o 5 1% t hrough V lasac I -
II ( Table 4 9) . T he i ncidence o f t his a ttribute d rops s harply , t o 2 6% , I i n t he S tar‘ Cevo material ( see Table 4 9). O ne s tylistic e lement o f t echnology , t hen , k napping s o a s t o p roduce a l ip o n t he p latform e dge a nd n ot t rimming i t o ff b efore s triking a nother f lake, s hows n o v ariation t hroughout t he t hree p hases o f t he M esolithic o ccupation , b ut a ppears t o b ecome d ramatically l ess f requent i n S tarCie vo t echnology . Another e lement, p latform e dge c rushing, o ne among s everal ways t o p repare a p latform e dge f or a b low t o d etach a f lake, s hows i ncreasing p opularity t hrough t he t hree M esolithic p eriods, t han a bruptly d rops o ff
i n t he S tarC 'evo m aterial.
T he c ertain p resence o f a b ulb o f p ercussion d ecreases s teadily t hrough t he t hree Mesolithic o ccupations o f V lasac, t hen i ncreases a gain i n t he S tarlevo m aterial. A s was p ointed o ut a bove, t he c lear p resence o f a s triking p latform o n f lakes a lso d ecreases, f rom 7 6 t o 6% i n t he Mesolithic o ccupation, a nd t o 5 9% i n t he S tarCevo. T he 6 a bsence o f p latforms m ay b e c aused b y: n odules b eing s hattered b y h eat; a b low o f v ery g reat f orce a s w hen a n odule i s s mashed a gainst a n a nvil; s napping o ff o f t he p roximal e nd a fter k napping, whether a ccidentally
o r
d eliberately;
t he
1 69
a pparent
a bsence
o f
a p latform
N. cc
C r )
S tarcevo
0 • • t
• -I
V lasac I I
0
N -
0
I
C g
v r . )
D C N 1 N -
I
N .
O N
0 0 0
C D
C N I
o
0
C N J
o o C O
• L r l
l imestone
0
s iltstone
u nidentified
CN
MATERIAL
0
b ecause t here i s n o b ulb , c lear p latform r etouch o r e dge c rushing , o ther d istinguishing a ttributes t o a llow c ertain i dentification.
o r
S ince t he p resence o f a b ulb o f p ercussion i s o ne o f t he a ttributes which h elps t o i dentify a s triking p latform, a k napping t echnique which p roduces n o i dentifiable b ulb o n s ome f lakes will c ontribute t o t he n umber o f p latforms which c annot b e p ositively i dentified , j ust a s a f lake w ith a t ruly a bsent ( detached) p latform i s l ikely a lso t o h ave t he b ulb r emoved . T he s ize a nd c larity o f t he b ulb i s m aximized b y d irect p ercussion w ith a h ammerstone , a nd m inimized b y s ofter ( bone, a ntler , wood) h ammers. ( Crabtree, 1 967b , p .60; 1 970, p .148; 1 972, p .9) . C rabtree ( 1970, p .150) a lso r eports t hat f lakes s truck w ith w ooden b illets h ave v ery l ittle d efinition o f t he b ulb , a nd o ften p roduce a l ip. L ips a re a lso p roduced w ith p unch t echnique ( 1972, p .13) . S peth ( 1972, p .39) h as r elated t he p rominence o f t he b ulb t o t he o bliquity o f t he a ngle o f i mpact o f t he h ammer, t he r oughness o f t he p latform a nd t he m agnitude o f a pplied f orce . S ince t he f requency o f o ccurrence o f l ips o n f lakes d oes n ot c hange s ignificantly i n V lasac I -III , t he i ntroduction o r i ncreased u se o f wooden b illets o r p unch t echnique i s n ot s upported . I ncreased u se o f o ther s oft h ammers, s uch a s a ntler o r b one, c annot b e r uled o ut. I ncreased u se o f q uartz f or c hipped s tone a rtifacts m ay h ave i nfluenced t he s tyle o f knapping f lint, a s, f or e xample, u sing g reater f orce o r m ore o blique s triking a ngle i n k napping . T here a re n o e xperiments i n k napping q uartz w hich c ould g uide t his s peculation . C rabtree 's ( 1967a , p .11) o nly c omment o n q uartz-knapping i s t hat i t r equires m uch s kill t o k nap a nything f rom t his d ifficult m aterial , a nd t hat t he e dges p roduced a re t ypically q uite d ull . T his i s a n i mportant p oint, a s t he m ostly a morphous , u nretouched f lint m aterial f rom a ll l evels o f V lasac d oes n ot s uggest p articularly s killed f lint-working . C rabtree a nd B utler ( 1964) , P urdy ( 1974 , 1 975) , a nd m ore r ecently B leed a nd Meier ( 1980) h ave a ll a ttempted t o t est t he e ffect o f h eat t reatment o n f lint, a nd a ll h ave c oncluded t hat t he " knapability" o f f lint i s i mproved when t he h eat t reatment i s p roperly d one. P urdy ( 1975, p .135) r eports t hat p ot l id f ractures, a small n umber o f which a re f ound i n a ll l evels a t V lasac ( see T able 4 9) ' a nd b locky, a ngular f lakes with n o b ulbs o f f orce, o f which t here a re a l arge n umber a t V lasac, a re p roduced r egularly b y h eating s tone t oo r apidly, o r b y h eating i t t o t oo h igh a t emperature . C razing , o r f ire c racking , f our e xamples o f which o ccurred i n V lasac I I, i s a lso c aused b y o verheating . C rabtree a nd B utler ( 1964, p .1) a lso r eport t hat h eat t reatment c hanges t he t exture , l ustre a nd s ometimes t he c olor o f p ieces, t hat i t i s m ore a pt t o b e s uccessful o n t hin p ieces, o r b lanks, t han o n t hick c hunks ( cores), which a re m ore a pt t o f racture, a nd t hat t he g reasy l ustre p roduced b y h eat t reating d oesn 't n ecessarily s how u nless f urther f laking a fter t reatment r eveals a f resh s urface. T he l ast p oint r elates t o t he d ifficulty, g enerally r ecognized, o f c ertain i dentification o f h eat t reatment i n t he a rcheological r ecord . With t his c aveat i n mind , i t c an b e p ointed o ut t hat t he p ercentage o f p ieces which a ppear h eat-treated j umps f rom 5 4% t o 7 3% f rom V lasac I t o I I, a nd r emains s teady t hereafter . V lasac I I a lso h as t he g reatest n umber o f " overheated" p ieces, a lthough t he n umbers a re v ery s mall ( 2% ,
1 71
o r 1 0 p ieces) . o f f orce" , o r
T he p ercentage o f " blocky , a ngular f lakes w ith n o b ulbs what I h ave c alled " shatter" , " blocky s hatter" , a nd
" can 't t ell" d oesn't v ary f rom o ccupation t o o ccupation, e xcept f or a d ecrease i n b locky s hatter f rom V lasac I t o I I, f rom 9 .16 t o 5 .03% ( see Table 7 3) i n t he S ummary d ata. T he c hanges i n p ercentages o f a pparently h eat-treated p ieces, s uggest t hat h eat t reatment w as e ither i ntroduced i n V lasac I I, o r b ecame a bruptly m uch m ore i mportant a t t hat t ime . Much o f t he l ustre i dentified a s h eat t reating l ustre m ay h ave b een a n i nherent q uality o f t he f lint-so t hat t he u se o f h eat t reating i n V lasac I i s n ot c ertain . T he s econd d ata s et, S quare 5 23, i s c oded f or h eating, c olor a nd " type" o f a rtifact ( shatter, b locky s hatter, f lake , e tc .) , a ll v ariables r elevant t o h eat t reatment . More l ight m ay b e t hrown o n t his i ssue b y t he a nalysis o f t hose d ata ( see b elow) . F igure 1 3 s hows t he d istribution o f l eft a nd r ight e dge a ngles f or a ll f our o ccupations. T here i s n o v ariation f rom o ne d istribution t o t he n ext, t he mean i s s teadily 5 7 °, a nd t he s kewness v alues a re a ll v ery l ow [ Skewness i s a m easure o f d eviation s ymmetrical b ell-shaped c urve ( Nie e t a l, 1 975, d istribution . I f a d istribution i s i ndicating a n ormal d istribution . F igure
1 4
s hows
t he
p erfectly
d istribution
o f
f rom a p erfectly p .184), o r n ormal
n ormal ,
s triking
s kewness
p latform
=
l ength a nd
w idth f or a ll o ccupations . S kewness i s h igher o n t hese d istributions, v arying b etween + 1 and 1 .7, r eflecting a c lustering o f c ases t o t he l eft o f t he mean with most e xtreme v alues t o t he r ight o f t he mean. A ll o f t he d istributions m eet t his d escription , w ith t he m ajority o f p ieces h aving v ery small p latforms i n a ll o ccupations., T he wean l ength a nd w idth o f t he s triking p latform d ecreased t hrough t ime f or t he M esolithic p hases F igure
1 5
s hows
( Table 5 3). t he
d istributions
t hickness o f f lakes f or e ach p hase. s imilar t o t hose s hown i n F igure 1 4 .
o f
m aximum
l ength ,
w idth ,
a nd
T hese d istributions a re q uite T he s kewness v alues f or s everal
d istributions a re q uite h igh b ecause o f t he wildly a berrant p iece i n e ach c ase . T he m ean v alues o nce a gain s how a s teady d ecrease t hrough t ime
( Table 5 4).
Maximum f lake s ize i s o f c ourse l imited b y t he s ize o f c ores available, b ut within t hat l imitation f lake s ize c an b e c ontrolled d eliberately i n t he k napping p rocess. A ccording t o S wanson ( 1968, p .52) t he w idth o f t he s triking p latform
C rabtree a nd i s d etermined
b y t he a mount o f p latform s urface c ontacted b y t he h ammerstone . T he width o f t he p latform i n t urn p artially d etermines t he t hickness o f t he f lake , w ith c rushed o r a braded p latforms a lso p roducing t hicker f lakes. ( Crabtree, 1 972, p .12) . T hese a re v ariables which a re c onsciously c ontrolled b y t he k napper . S peth 's ( 1975) m ore c ontrolled e xperimental work h as s hown t hat t he a ngle o f impact o f t he h ammerstone i s a lso a s ignificant
v ariable.
F or
a g iven
m aximum
p latform
t hickness,
a
v ertical i mpact w ill p roduce a s lightly t hicker a nd l onger f lake t han mpact . S peth ( 1974, pp.'', 1 2) h as a lso r elated w ill a n o blique ( 45 ° ) i f lake s ize a nd s hape t o t he h ammerstone v elocity , t he s trength o f t he m aterial ,
a nd
i ts
e lastic
p roperties
1 72
( 1972,
p .34) .
0 6 * *v .* 8 8 * ** 9 8 * **** 5 8 * * e 8 * *** £ 8 * ** Z 8 * 4444 1 8 * ******** 0 8 * *** 8 L . * ***** L t * **** 9 L * *********** S L * ******* e t . * ********** E L * ***** Z L * ** I L * ************* O L * ****** 6 9 * ******** 8 9 * v .*** L 9 9 * 444*** 9 * ***************** 5 9 * v .*** V 9 * *********** £ 9 * ********* Z 9 * ******1 9 * ********************* 0 9 * **** 6 5 * ********** 8 5 * 444 L S * ******* 9 5 * S ****************** S * 44*** t S * ********* £ 5 * ********** Z S * ************* I S * ******************* O S 4 44* 6 t * my .* 8 e * ******** L e * ********** 9 t * ********************* S t * **********e $* t * ************** E t * ******* z e * ********* I t * *********** O t * 4 .4** 6 £ * ********* 8 £ * * L £ * * * * * * 9£ * ********** 5 £ * 4*** e £ * 4444*E E * 44** Z E * *** I t * *****O E * ** 6 Z * ***** 8Z * *** L 2 * 44*9 Z * 4 S Z V Z * **** * * E Z * 4* S I
1 73
Kurtosis:
LEFT,
IN
E H
o f E dge Angles
DEGREES
44 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 * 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
EDGE ANGLE
J r . 44
• •
L "" 1 ••
( l
( 1 . 1 4 1
51 .
4## 4 4 i s t** 4 t,e ****** * 44******** 4 *********** * 44 4 4444444444 4
P L E L Z L I L O L 6 9 8 9 L 9 9 9 5 9 t 9 £ 9 Z 9 1 9 0 9 6 S 8 S
4444444 4 4444444444444444 4 ****** * 444444444 4 # 444****** # 444444444 ***************** * ####*# # ######4** # ********** *
I N
44444444 4 ***************** * 44444444 4 ******** * ************ * 444444 4 ********************* * ****** * ****** *
9 S S S P S E S Z S T S O S t, 6 L P
4444444444******** 4 ******
S 9 P t
# 4444444444 ***************** * # 44444 ****** *
E P Z P I t '
4 .4444 4
o e
* ***6 £ * ********8 £ * ******* L E * *I F* 9 E * ********** S E 4 4** P E * ******* * * EE Z E * ****** 4 ** T E 4 44444444444 O E 4 * 6 Z * ** i f .*** 8 Z * * L Z 4 4444 9 Z 4 444 S Z 4 * P Z 4 * E Z * 4 Z Z # 44 O Z * * 9 1
1 74
1 1 • 0
S kewness:
** * * * * 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
DEGREES
**** * ** * ******* * **** * 444444 4 4444 4 * 44 t
0 6 8 8 L 8 9 8 5 8 P 8 £ 8 Z 8 1 8 0 8 6 1 . 8 1 . L L 9 L
EDGE ANGLE RIGHT,
*4 ,4**************************** * *** * * 4 * 44 ****** * 4 **
4 44 4
4 8 44 4 » 4 # # 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 # 4 4 4 4 8 4 4 4 4 # 4 4 4 4 4 # 4 4
4 44844444 4 #4#4####4#####4#######4#44# * ********* 4 4443 .#4444#4#4#444444844 4 #444444#44444444444## # #####4######4***#####4# 4 444444444 4 4444444484444444 * ************** 4 4444444444484444 t#4#4448444444 4 444444844448 4 44484448#4444844444 4 44444444444444448444444 4 448484444444 8 #8. . .############4 . # #####44#4*********** * ************ * ****** 4 444444444444444444#444444#44 8 44444 4 4844444444444 4 4484444 4 444##444444444444 4 844444444444444 # 44444484 4 44444 * ******** * *444 4 4 . ******•**** * ***** # 4444444 4 44 4 4 4 844 4 4,
1 75
DEGREES
4 444444#44844###4# 4 84448444444484
0 6 6 8 8 8 9 8 5 8 1 7 8 £ 8 Z 8 1 8 0 8 6 L 8 L L L 9 L S L V L E L Z L I L O L 6 9 8 9 L 9 9 9 S 9 e 9 £ 9 Z 9 1 9 0 9 6 5 8 5 L S 9 5 S S V S E S Z S T S 0 5
I N
4 4 4 44444 4 44444 * ***41 .4 # 4#4### 4 44448 8 4444444 4 4444444 * ******************* # ##444## 4 #4###44### 4 44**** # 44##4#### # #4####44#44444### # 4484444 4 4444444448 * ********* 4 44444444 * *****************444#448444 .4 4 4444448 4 44844444448444 # 4#4#######4## 4 444444444444 # #88444#4#4#4844444444848844#4 # 84448844.4. •
EDGE ANGLE LEFT,
44 4 8 4 4 4 # 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 # 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
8 1 7 L V 9 V s e e t E I ' ZV 0 1 7 6 £ 8 £ L E 9 £ S E V E E E Z E T E O E 6 Z B Z 9 Z Z 1 T Z 6 1 8 1 E T
44 4 4 4 4 40 k
44 * * ,144 4 , 4 e 44 4 4
#
4# ** * * * * * * * * * *
********** * ******ev s .****** * ******************* * ******************** * ********************* * ********** * . 4.4#######44444### ************* * #####e****#########4#####
************************* * 4 ** * * * * * * *
********** * ***** * # 44444444. #4 4 4 4 4 44 •
44 4 4
44
* ******* * ******************* * *************** * *********** * **************** * ********** * **•********* * ********* * 4*** * ************ * ******** * ****** * * * 444* * 44* ***** * * * * * * 44* * * * * ** *
1 76
0 6 8 8 L 8 9 8 S 8 V 8 £ 8 Z 8 1 8 0 8 6 L 8 L L L 9 L S L t L E L Z L I L O L 6 9 8 9 L 9 9 9 5 9 e 8 £ 9 Z 9 1 9 0 9 6 5 8 5 L S 9 S 5 5 V S £ 5 Z S I S O S 6 t 8 e L t 9 1 7 5V VV E V Z e O V 6 E B E L £ 9 E S E P E E E £ I t O E 6 Z 8 Z L Z 9 Z S Z V Z Z Z Z O Z 8 1 L T S T
DEGREES
4 444444e* 4 4444 t , * ****** * **** * ******** * ******* * 44444* * ******** * 4*** * 44444444 *********** * ******** * ********** * ******* * ******* * ######################4## # ****** * 444444444444 4 ****** * 44444444444444 4 ##44#####4######4# # 4444444444 4 ************* * *********************** * ******************* * ******************** * ###############* # ******************************* * ************ * **************** * ************************** * ****** * ***************** * ************ * ****************** *
4 1#
I N
e
EDGE ANGLE R IGHT,
e eev
1 77
E S Z S 1 5 O S 6 6 8 6 L t 9 6 5 6 E t Z6 1 6 o e 6 £ 8 E L E 9 £ S E V E £ £ Z £ 1 £ 0 £ 6 Z 8 Z 9 Z e z 1 Z O Z
V LASAC I II
DEGREES IN LEFT,
0 6 8 8 9 8 5 8 6 8 £ 8 Z 8 1 8 0 8 6 L 8 L L L 9 L S L V t . £ L Z L I L O L 6 9 8 9 L 9 9 9 5 9 t 9 £ 9 Z 9 1 9 0 9 6 5 8 5 L S 9 5 S S
EDGE ANGLE
e ************************** * * * ***** * ******** * ** * **** 4 4** 4 4** * 44444444 * **A i* 4 *** * *** * ******** * *444# * *********** 4 4444 4 4 .4444 4 4 t444, 44************* 4 44,4 ***** * ************** * ******* * ******** * ********************** * *************** * ************** * *************** * ******** * **************** * ********* * ************ * ******** * ********** * ************* * ************ * *********** * ************* * ********** * ******************* * ****** * ******** * ************ * ***************** * *************************** * ******* * ********** * 444444* 4 ****** * #4#########4# # ####4## # ******* * ************* * ****** * ******** * **** * * 44** * 444 ****** * ***** * 4 * *** * * * 4 4 * * ** *
*** * * * * * * ** * 4 * * * ** * * * 44 * * * * * * *
* *i t********* * *********** * **********
. 44444 4
.
* **************** * ** 44
* *********** * ***** * ********** * *******************
G e P E V
T e
* ****** i t * * *i t*
O P 6 £ 8 £ L E 9 £ S E V E E E
* i t * ***** i t ** 4 *** * ***** * ** 4 ***
T E 0 £ 6 Z 8 Z L Z 9 Z S Z
4 . *
8 1
4 . 4 . 4 .
e z E z z
1 78
DEGREES I N
( cont'd) F igure 1 3
4 1-* * * * * *
* ******* i t v i tee******** * ****************
0 6 8 8 9 8 5 8 P 8 £ 8 Z 8 1 8 0 8 6 L 8 L L L 9 L S L V C E L Z L I L O L 6 9 8 9 £ 9 9 9 5 9 P 9 £ 9 Z 9 1 9 0 9 6 5 8 5 L S 9 5 S c P S E S Z S I S O S 6 V 8 V L t 9 V
R IGHT,
4 ,4 1 * ** * ***4*** * ***** * i t** 4 *** * *** * i t* * ****** * ***** * ****** * ******** * **i f** * ************* i t i t******** * ********** * **** * ******* * ************* * ********** * ************* * *********** * ************ * ******************* * ***** * ************* * ********* * *********** * ************** * ******** * *********** * ********** * ******* * ******************
EDGE ANGLE
* ****************4444
4 e
*
4 e
•
l e *
l e l e *
t f l e n 0 % e t ' e f l l e c N N N re M l
0 0 N
m
r e ) L f l e n 0 N r - r 4 C • 1 . g e r c n r e , U l g r n r e l, I I e f l e l t f l I / 1 1 4 / . 0 V > U ) % . 0 r -
O 0
i . ) r -
r - c o c o c o
EDGE A NGLE L EFT, I N DEGREES
K urtosis :
— 0.6
V : c C D C O 0 1 0 N M tn f i l
N e e l g e r e t ) e . 0 0 r 1 C q L 1 1 0 « , 11 T r L n L n L f l L f l L f 1
S kewness : 0 .3
** * * * * * * * * *
5 6 .1
** * * * * * * * * *
M ean :
** * * * * * * * * *
*
* l e
** * * * * * * * * *
*
l e
** * * * * * * * * *
l e
** * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
4 e
** * * * * * * * * *
*
r e ) . 1 . 1 1 0 t . 0
r 4 i t 1 C Y 1 ( N M 0 T • T s, N C O C O C T
E DGE A NGLE R IGHT, I N DEGREES
M ean :
5 .3
K urtosis:
— 1.1
V LASAC I V
F igure 1 3 1 79
( cont'd)
S kewness:
0 .3
• • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • • • •• • 4 1 1 8 4 1 • • 4 . • • M ean : 9 .5 • l c • 4 14 8•• K urtosis : 0 .5 ••••••••• ••4 . 14 1••••• S kewness : 1 .0 ••••••••• ••••1•••* 1 •i g•••••••• •••4 c•1 8I t••« 1• •4 .•4 1••• • 4 •••4 1•••••• • 4 1 *e l * • • • • 4 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4 1• •• 1 •4 •••••••••• •1 1 • • • * • ••••••••4 1•• 1 ••4 14 1•••••1• •• 4 8• •4 c ••••• •• •* •• 4 1•••• •4 1i t••1 .•1••• 4 1• •• •• • 1 •1•*•••1••• ••••• • • 1 1 ••1 8•4 1••*••• ••••••4 .• • •4 1••I . • • • • • ••••• ••• • ••4 1 11 1 • 114 1•1••••• • •«•4 1•4 1•••4 1••4 1• • • 4 1•••i t••4 1• ••••••••••« • • •
• • • • 4 1 • t • I 4 1•• 4 14 1• 4 1•• i tI t4 1 •
•
• •
• 1 1
•
4 .
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
4 1
•
• •
•
•
•
•
•
1 1
•
• •
• •
• •
• •
• •
•
•
•
• i t • i t • • • • • • • •
•
•
#
•
•
•
•
•
•
4 1
•
•
4 1•• *•* • •4 •• 1•• •4 1• ••4 1 4 . 1* 4 1• *• ••• ean : 3 .4 1• M ••1• ••• •••• K urtosis : 4 .4 ••*• S kewness : 1 .7 1•1 8•• 1 ••••• •4 1••• ••4 1••• •••••1 1 • • 1• ••• • • 4 • • • •••••• •••••• 4 1 • • • •4 1 •••••4 1 •• ••• •••4 1 •• • • • • • • • • • • •••••i c4 1•1 1 i c e * 4 . • 4 1 • ••••4 1•4 11 1•••••4 1•• 4 1•4 8•*4 1i c • • • • • •
•
•
P n
n r rr C D o O 4 a r V C 4 u h 2 M n w C V h e o I c r V C r 4 i c r m 4 r . 4 4 V r e A C V r r 4 C V e m C V C V r n C V C
•
• • • • • « • • • •
( ) P L M A T E F I O H R M
r A C V r l e r u nv o C s 0 2 C h C 2 e 4 C V r n - 4 . 4 4 4 4 ( t 4 1 )
I C V L A S
PLATFORM W IDTH
4 1 i c 4 14 1 •• •• •
#
• •
• •
•
•
l c • • •• •l c •4 1 i c• •• •• 4 1•• ••4 1 •I .• ••
• • 4 1 • • •
I .
• • •
• •
•
•
4 1••4 1• ••••4 8 •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4 1
• • • • • • • • • • • •
e r
4 .
•
M ean : 3 .4 ••• • • I t K urtosis : 2 .3 ••• ••• •«• • S k e w n e s s : 1 . 4 *•••4 1 •••••
1. 4
•
i n V ) r - O D 0 1 C D 6 . 4 C V r n ‘ e r v . ,V ) r - cn C ) r 4 C V e l . 1 . U I V D r -02 C h r 4 e r e Ar n e 4 r 4 m 4 e A r i m i r 4 e V e 4 r 4 C V C V C V C V ( . 4r 4 C V r 4 r 4 e n r n P LATFO IE L ENGTH
•
•
• • • • • •
4 g••4 .4 g••••••• •• * *** •••••4 c•••• • • • • • • • • • • • • 4 g•1 .•4 c 1 •• • • • I .•••4 1••4 1••1• 1e i 4 . • • • • • • • • • 4 1 • • • • • •1 • • • • • • * • • • • • • • • • • • • • • * I t * e • * * i t « « i t * 4 . • l i • i •••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4 . 4 1• ••1 .s 4 g•4 1* • • *•••••• 4 1• 4 c*•• • •••••••••480•••••• • 14 1••••••41 14• • • •4 • 1 ••4 14 14 1•••* **** •*••1•••4 1••••4 84 1•i t4 . • 4 . r 4 r 4 r n
•
•
4 14 14 1 4 1•4 1 *
M ean : 9 .5 K urtosis : 2 .6
4 c**• • •••• 4 c•4 c• ••4 1 •••••• kewness: ••••••••• S 1 g•** 4 1•••1•4 •••4 8*••4 14 c• 1 1•• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
•
•
( t 4 4 )
• 4 . • • • • • • ••
t • • • • • I •••••• • • • • • • • •*•i t••• • • • • • 4 1• • • • • • • • • • • • * e t •• 1i t• • • • • • • 4 •• • • •••••••4*4 e • • 4 .••• 8 c• e 4 C V e l
u l
r -co c m o r n e 4 e V r 4
P LATFORM W IDTH
( P u )
V LASAC I I
F igure 1 4: H istograms o f P latform L ength a nd W idth 1 80
U I
r A
M ean : 2 .9 K urtosis : 3 .9 S kewness : 1 .6
* a 4 1a 4 1
**
** * * * * * * * *
• a* * a * * * « a* a* I x * * * a* a* « a* a* * a
** * * * * * * * * * * * *
M ean : 8.1 K urtosis : 3 .3 S kewness : 1 .6
4 1 4 1 * *
a • a a a a • a
a a * *• * * a a a. a a * • * *▪ * aae t aI .• a • * • * • *
e AC VM Ie rU MW C .C OC hC )P AC 4r ne rU M0r .C OC h0C VO M00r .O hC V e 4m 4r 4e 4r 4e 4e Ae 4e 4e 4C Vr yC VC VC AC VC VM I P LATFORM L ENGTH
a a . , a ▪ a
'
• 4 1
*
. .' *
*
*•*
4 1 • *
*
m AC Vr mg rU 10r -C OC A 0 Lf l e Ar 4 P LATFORM W IDTH ( t 4 ) 4
4 ( 4 )
V LASAC I II
a a a a a a
a a* a. *a •* a a*
a. *
# a a a 4 1 4 1 a •
a 4 1 4 1 4 1 a a 4 1 4 1
•* *a a* a* a* a* al c *
** * * * * * * * * *
a 4 1 a 4 1 a * • *
M ean : K urtosis: S kewness :
C Vmg rLf l NO e i
a a a a • • ▪ a
8 .8 2 .1
* * *a « * *
• *a a* •* •* a. a* a* a*
1 .6
a a a
*
a a
M ean : 3.1 K urtosis : 2 .0 S kewness: 1 .6
«
I t
a a
a • ‚ a .' * 4 1 4 1 •
** •a a e aa a • •« I a. • * a •*a a •*a a * * ** * C hr nr q r m
•
m 4 m 4 u 4 N
f n
t f l 0 0 0
P LATFORM W IDTH ( t 1M )
P LATFORM L ENG TH ( t e l )
V LASAC I V
F igure 1 4 ( cont'd) 1 81
T ABLE 5 3 S TRIKING P LATFORM M EANS
L evel
M ean p latform w idth
M ean p latform l ength
V lasac I
9 .497
3 .413
V lasac I I
9 .431
3 .349
V lasac I II
8 .107
2 .937
v S tarcevo
8 .783
3 .087
T ABLE 5 4 F LAKE L ENGTH, L evel
W IDTH A ND T HICKNESS M EANS
M ean L ength
M ean W idth
V lasac I
2 2.818
1 6.608
6 .048
V lasac I I
2 2.710
1 6.198
5 .891
V lasac I II
2 2.328
1 4.675
5 .670
vo S tarCie
2 1.090
1 4.873
5 .487
1 82
M ean T hickness
• • • •
• • • • •
• s e • i t •
• s t • •
i t 1 4 1 4 1 • •
4 1 • 4 1 • • • 4 1 • • • • 4 t 4 1 •
•
• • • 4 1 • 1 • • • • •
• • • • 1 • • • 4 t 4 1 * • • • i t 4 1 •
• • I t • • • 4 8 1 • • • • • • • • •
• • • 4 1 • •
• • • 4 1 • • • « • • • • • 1 8 1
i t •
• • 4 . • •
• • 4 1 • 4 1 • • 4 1 • • • • • • • 4 t • 4 1 • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • 4 1 i t • 4 1 • • • • • • • • 4 1 • • • • • 4 1 • •
M ean : 9 .1 K urtosis: 2 .9 S kewness: 1 .3
• • 4 1 •
• •
n er U M 0 r . 02 0 0 4r n 0 r s 0 2 C h C D . 4 r 4 r . 4 . 4 . 4 . 4 ri eA . 4 . 4 re r i r 4 r 4 r 4 r 4 1 1 F LAKE L ENG ' 1
• •
• •
• • I t • • I t •
• • • • I t • •
• s t
• • « • • •s t«•
r 4 0 1 e l . U ,
• • 4 1 • 1 • • • • • • • • 1 4 8 • •
• • • 1 8 4 1 • 4 1 1 • • • •
• 4 t I t • • • 4 1 I t • 1 • 4 1 •
• • 4 1 • • •
•
•
•
4 8
• • 4 1 • • • i t • • 1 • • • 4 1 •
• • 4 8 4 t • • 4 1
• • • • I t • 4 1
i f
•
• • • • s t• •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4 .4 ; • • • • • •
** * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
** * * * * * * * * *
•
• •
O
• 4 . • • i t 4. # • • • 4 1 • 4 1 • • • • 4 1 •
M ean : K urtosis: S kewness:
• i f • • • •• •• • • • •• •• t o• • • a• 4 1• « • • • • s t•• •• • •
• • • • N
• • • 4 1 4 1 •
M 1 e l . I n 0
WM )
• 4 1 •
•• • N CO
• *
c n 0 _
4 1 4 1 • 4 8 . 4 N
FLAKE w i t Yn i
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • 1
• • • • i f
• • s t • • • • 4 1
• • • •
• s t • s t • • • • •
• • • 1 4 1
M ean : K urtosis: S kewness:
••.• 4•1 • •••••• •
• • • • 4 1 • •
• •
s t • • •
• •
• • • •
4 1 4 1 • •
•
• •• • • • • •• •• • • • 4 1 • • • • •• s t• 4 1
• • • • 1 4 1
m
r .
I n r4
. 4 r 4
( 1 4 1 )
• 1 • • • • • •
• • • • •
• • • i t 4 1 • • • •
• •
6 .0 14 2 .3
9 .1
• •
• • • • • •• • • • • • • •4 . • • * • • • • • •
4 1 • • • • •
i t • • •
•
•
• • 4 1 • 1 i t • • • • • • • • t • • •• • • • I 4 1 • • • • 4 1 1 4 8 • • •4 1 • 4 1 • • 4 1 • I t 1 1 4 1 1 • • • • • • • 4 • •s t• • •• • • • 4 1 4 1 • • • • • • 4 1 • • •
r n
e r I n
•
•
• •
r i N
4 8 • 4 1 •
r -
0 3 C h
e4 r 4 r n e r . 4 . 4 . 4 . 4 r A
F LAKE I IICKNESS I
• • 1 1 4
• 4 1 4 1 •
• •
I nN c mr y r r4. 4 r i N r -
(el
V LASAC I
F igure 1 5: H istograms o f F lake L ength, 1 83
6 .7 1 .8 1 .0
•• • •
** * * * * * *
• •
• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • ••
W idth a nd T hickness
• • r q
* * *
* e * •
5 5 * 4 1
M ean : K urtosi s : S kewness:
• • * 4 1 • 5 • * * • 4 . * ** * ** 41
•
1 4 * 4 1 4 1 1 1 • 1 4 1 4 1 4 1
* • * # • 4 * 4 1 4 1 4 1 * 4 1 4
r a m., L n
1 5 * • 5 * 4 • 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 • * 4 1 1 1 4 . * 4 1
4 1 5 * • * * , • 4 1 * 4 1 5 * * 4 1 • * * * 4 1
4 1 .0 4 c • 4 c e * * * • « • * * * * * * 5 . 5 4 1 4 1 * 4 1 4 1 4 • • 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 4 . 5 * * 4 1 4 1 4 1 • • 1 4 1 1 • 1 4 1 * 1 * * * * * * * i i 4 1 C O O N 0
* * e 4 1 4 1 4 1 * * 4 1 • • • 1 4 1 * • r i
5 * * 5 4 1 * 4 1 4 1 * • • 4 1 1 1 • • •
* 5 e 5 * 5 * * * *
1 9 . 0 .9 0 .8 5 * ‚ 4 5
* 4 1 * • 4 1 1 * • • * *
* • • • 4 1 4 1 * 1
, 1
F LAKE LENG /I i i
• 4 1 4 1 * 4 1
L n
5 * 4 1 • 4 1 4 1 * * * 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 e
, 1
r -
cr t c t F 1 N , 4 N
N
# 4 1 4 4 1 * 5 • 4 1 4 1 * 4 1
5 1
4 . «
N
* 5 5 5 * •
*«* 4 . * * *** *«* *•• *** 4 8 * 4 1
5 * 4 . 4 * 4
i .
i l
4 1 4 1 4 1 « 5 . 1 5 1 4 * * 1
* 5 4 1 4 1 4 5 4 1 5 • * * 4 1 5
4 . 5 5 , * 5 4 1 4 1 4 . 4 1 4 1 5 * 4 1 5 1 * « • 1
* * * * 4 1
4 4 . 5 • • 4 . « . , . . * * 4 . • 5 4 8 4 1 # 1 # * 4 1 * * * « 4 1 4 1 4 1 • * * ** 5 * 5 5 4 1 * * 5 5 . . 1 * * * * * 4 1 * * 4 1 4 1 4 1 1 * *
M ean : 6 .5 K urtosis : 3 .0 S kewness : 1 .3
* 4 * * . * * * • 4 [ 5 ▪ * * • e 4 . 4 8 * * 5 « . . 5 5 5 * * * 4
1 1 1 0 I ' s C O 0 1 0 , 1 f 1
N
N
( e t )
r i m e
▪ * 5 • *
1 5 1 5 4 1 # 5 * 4 1 # * 5 *
4 1 4 1 # « 4 1 * * * *
* •
* 5
« *
M ean : K urtosis: S kewness:
• 1 ▪ 1
4 1 * * 1 4 1 *
e s 4 m
4 14 1 1 1 i t
5 * 5 *
« 5 * *
* * * * * * * 4 1 4 1 4 1 I « 4 1 4 1 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 *
L n O r- c o c h
N m
( le )
V LASAC I I
( cont'd)
1 84
* 1 4 1
i n t o U
. 4 r 1 9 1 r 1 • I
F LAKE I HICKN ESS
F igure 1 5
5 .9 3 .1 1 .3
N • I N
4 1 5 1 5 4 1
t f l W r s C O 0 A l r 4 F 1 r 1 r I . 4 . 1 N N
F LAKE W IDTH
** ** * **
* * * * 4 8 5 * •
( 44 )
• • • • • • « • • • • II
•
• •• •• • •• 11 11 11 •• • •
1 1
1 1
1
1
1
• • •
11 1 • 11 • •• • *I 1 11 1 11 1 11 • •4 1
• 4 1
•
•
M e an:
1 4 1 •
4 1
• •
• •
• •
•
•
•
•
.4
• • •
• • •
• « •
• •
4 1
• 4 8 • •
• • • •
• • • •
• • • •
• • • •
•
•
•
•
•
4 1
•
#
•
4 .
4 .
C A
r mg e u mV Dr ,
1
4 .•••
• • • • • • 4 1 • 4 8
0 3 0 , 0 r 4 N el U M Y 2 r -cm c p rA CA r 4 m A r A r 4 m A m A m A r A r A C A N C A
• •
•
•
1
•
4 1
• •
• •
• •
• •
*4 ! 11 1 1 • 11 11 1 • • 11 11 1 • • 11 1 1 1 1 • • • 11 1 • • • • • • • • •• 11 11 1 • 11 • • • •• •• • •e •• • • • • • • • •
** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
M e a n:
5 .7
K u rt o s i s:
13 1. 2
• •
Sk e w nes s:
8. 4
• * * * * 4 8 •
• * * * * * •
• * * * * * •
• • * * * * •
* 4 i
*
* *
* *
* *
* *
* *
• •
4 1 •
• •
• • ** * * * • • • «1 ** * * * * ** * * * • « • • 4 t • • * * * * * • •4 .• . • « •• • ** * * * 11 1 • 11 • «1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 •
r 4 C V
r m
* I 1 1
u pr -
4 1
•
•
0 2 C h C D r 4 C V r mm r VI VD r - 04 a r . 4 m 4 4 4r -4 9 . 4 P 4 N r
FLAKE I HICKNESS
V L AS AC
F igure
15
( 2 4 ) 4
III
(c o nt' d)
1 85
• •
• •
• 4 .
4 . •
• •
0 3 C h a r V c1 u mu p r A P 4 . 4 ' 4 r A r4 r 4
4. •
• * * * * * •
0. 9
11 1 • • •• 1 • • • 4 • • • •• •
F LAKE W IDIU
( 44 )
0. 8
•
• • 4 1 11 • •• • • • • • • •• •• • • 4 1 4 1 • e • •• •• •
• •
5 .9
M e a n:
e K u rt o s i s: 11 • • •• • • •• *: • Sk e w ne s s:
•
FLAKE L ENG 'r l i
•
•
K urt os i s:
** * * * * *
u nO r -
4 1 4 1 • 4 1 1 • •
• 4 1
11 1 * ▪ 4 1 4 1 11 • 11 • 11 11 • 11 1 11 *1 1 11 1 11 • • • • • • • •• 11 1 11 1 1 1 1 C V 0) 4 /
• • • • 1 • • •
8 .9
•• • • 11 11 11 11
4 8 • 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1
• • 4 8 4 1 1 •
11 • • •• •
*
• •• • • 11 • 11 1 1 11 11 1 • • 11 1 • • • •• 1 1
I
• • •
** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
• • * « • • • • • •
( 44 )
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
••
•
• • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • •
•
•
8 .4
M ean :
K urtosis: • •• 41• • •• • •« S k : •••• • ewness ••••
5 .1 2 .2
•
• • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • •
• • • •
• • • e •
• • • 4. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4 • • ' • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
i n
r -co m e mo :D.I
F LAKE LE t i Ci l l i
N
N N
( ) F L A E K W I D 1 7 4
g o r
n m r o i 0 I 3 n O y C 0 g i C i h 4 r s -
4 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
( MK )
• • • • • 4 1 • • 4 1
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • «
M ean : 5 .5 K u r t o s i s : 4 .6 • • •• • •• • • Skewness: 2.0 •• •
• • • • • •
• • • • • •
4 . • • • • • • • •
• • • • • •
« • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • •
• • • • •
* * * * * 4 1 4 1 4 4 14 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 1 • 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 • • 4 1 4 1 • • • 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 • 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 • 4 1 • 1 • • • • • • • • • 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 e • • • • •
• •
. 4N m
i n
r s c oe t N m Nrm
F L A K ET H IC K N ES S m e
V LASAC I V
F igure 1 5 ( cont'd) 1 36
I n t he V lasac m aterial t he r elationship b etween s triking p latform w idth a nd f lake t hickness i s h ighly p atterned : a g iven p latform w idth d efines a m inimum v alue f or f lake t hickness . M any c ases f all r ight o n t he d iagonal c reated b y t his m inimum t hickness f or e ach p latform w idth v alue a nd m any h ave v alues a bove t he m inimum t hickness. T he a ngle a nd v elocity o f impact, a nd p roperties o f t he material may e xplain t his v ariation, b ut d ata t o e xamine t hese v ariables were n ot c ollected. F igure 1 6 s hows t he r elation b etween p latform w idth a nd f lake t hickness f or a s ample o f a ll m aterial ( Figure 1 6a) a nd f or e ach o ccupation l evel s eparately ( Figure 1 6b-e) . T he r elatively l ow v alues f or R a re p robably c aused b y t he f act t hat t he d istributions f or t hese v ariables a re a symmetrical , which S peth & J ohnson ( 1976, p .40) h ave n oted c ontracts t he
p ossible
r ange
o f
t he
c orrelation
c oefficient,
w hich
" may
b ecome
s ubstantially l ess t han 1 .0" . T he l ine d efining t he l imiting v alue o f x f or e ach v alue o f yd oes n ot c hange a t a ll t hrough t ime, s uggesting t hat i t i s d efined b y i nvariable p hysical p rinciples . T he d istribution o f p oints b elow t hat l ine d oes c hange t hrough t ime. T he s lope o f t he r egression l ine d ecreases a nd t he i ntercept o f t hat l ine o n y i ncreases s teadily t hrough t ime ( see T able 5 5) . I n t erms o f t he d istribution o f c ases t his means t hat a bove t he m inimum l imiting v alues f or t he t hickness o f a f lake w ith a g iven s triking p latform w idth , t he a verage f lake i s g etting t hicker t hrough t ime r elative t o p latform width . F igures 1 4 and 1 5 a bove s howed t hat m ean p latform width a nd f lake t hickness d ecrease t hrough t ime . T herefore, f lake t hickness i s d ecreasing a bsolutely, b ut i ncreasing r elative t o p latform width, t hrough t ime. C hange f rom o blique t o v ertical impact with t he h ammerstone would e xplain t he t hicker f lakes r elative t o p latform a nd s hould a lso p roduce s horter f lakes . F lake l ength d oes d ecrease t hrpugh t ime. P latform e dge c rushing o r a brading , which p roduces t hicker f lakes, i ncreases f rom 4 4% t o 4 7% t o 5 0% i n V lasac I -III, which i s t he r everse o f t he o bserved a bsolute t rend i n t hickness, b ut which c ould a ccount f or s ome o f t he i ncrease r elative t o p latform w idths . S trength a nd e lastic p roperties o f t he m aterial c ould n ot r easonably h ave c hanged , p eriods,
a s t here was n o c hange i n t he r aw material s tudied f or a ll m ostly a ll l ocally a vailable n odule f lint. T he o nly o ther
v ariable which c ould a ccount f or t he o bserved t rends i s h ammerstone v elocity . T here m ay b e o ther v ariables w hich i nfluence f lake t hickness which h ave n ot y et b een i dentified b y t he s mall n umber o f r esearchers working o n t his a spect o f l ithic t echnology. O therwise, a n i ndirect m ethod o f i dentifying s everal p robable c hanges i n d etails o f k napping , a verage h ammerstone v elocity a nd a ngle o f i mpact h as b een p resented . T he
l ength o f
t he
s triking
p latform
i s
l argely
d etermined
b y
t he
c ontour o f t he e dge o f t he c ore c hosen a s t he p lace t o s trike a f lake , p reparation o f t hat e dge b efore s triking, a nd t he d istance o f t he i mpact f rom t he e dge, o r t he e ventual width o f t he p latform. R ather h igh c orrelations ( Pearson : R ) a re n ot s urprising f or p latform l ength w ith p latform w idth ( see T able 5 6). T he t o
c hange
r elative t hrough
v alues
o f
p latform
t ime when o ne
w idth a nd
i nspects
t he
p latform
s lopes
a nd
l ength
a ppear
i ntercepts
o f
t he r egression l ine f or e ach p hase ( see T able 5 7). P latform l ength s eems t o i ncrease r elative t o p latform w idth . H owever , u sing t he m ean v alues, t he r elative l ength a nd w idth o f t he s triking p latform c an b e s een n ot
t o c hange
( Table 5 8).
1 87
• ,
1 9.00
+
1 7.00
+
1 5.00
+
1 3.00
+
1.00 1
+
9 .00
+
2
3
3
4
9
a a a
• 7 .00 +
9
•
• 5 .00 +
9
• 3 .00
+
1 .00
+ 9 1 .00
9
3 2
9
5
7
*
9
7
7
2
3
9
6
4
5
*
9
9
9
9
5
3
3
9
9
9
9
9
8
4
3
2
9
9
9
9
9
7
6
4
3
6
7
*
2
*
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
5
5 .80
8 .20
4
•
2
2
9
9
•
2
2
9
9
3 .40
2 4
*
•
*
4 *
*
*
2
10.60 1 3.00 15.40 F LAKE T HICKNESS (0 1)
1 7.80
2 0.20
R : 0 .58874 S ig: 0.00000
V LASAC I a ll a ges ( random s ample)
F igure 1 6:
S cattergrams o f P latform W idth b y F lake T hickness 1 88
•
2.60 2
' 1 9
0 0
1 7
0 0
+
1 5.00
+
1 3.00
+
= E . 0
5
2
*
9 .00
+
7 .00
+
N
0 w 5 . < 4 a
2
5 .00
+
5
*
4
*
*
9
3
3
2
*
2
7
9
8
3
3
2
2
9
8
8
8
7
3
9
9
9
8
5
7
3
*
:
9
9
9
9
9
6
2
4
2
100
+ 6
9
9
9
9
6
4
2
*
3
5 .80
8 .20
*
.
+
3 .40
*
*
a
*
*
4
3 00
1 .00
*
*
2
*
*
2
1 0.60 1 3.00 FLAKE T HICKNESS ( MM )
R : 0 .66681 S ig : 0 .00000
V LASAC I
F igure 1 6 ( cont'd) 1 89
1 5.40
1 7.80
2 0.20
2 2.60
1 9.00
*
1 7.00
+
1 5.00
;
1 3.00
;
2
1.00 1
5
4
* 9 .00
5
7 .00
+
5 .00
+
3 .00
+
1 .00
+ 4 1 .00
9
7
*
9
6
4
9
5
2
2
*
*
9 9
9
9
9
6
4
3
*
*
9
9
9
6
7
2
2
3
2
2
4
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
5 .80
3 a
9
3 8
2
5 5
9
9
3 .40
2
2
*
*
3 *
*
*
8 .20
2 1 0.60 1 3.00 F LA JM E THI O N EMS ( t4 )
R : 0 .59317 S ig: 0.00000
V LASAC I I
F igure 1 6
1 90
( cont'd)
15.40
1 7.80
2 0.20
2 2.60
1 9.00
+
1 7
0 0
+
1 5.00
+
1 3.00
;
El • l AO
+
= 0
5 9 .00
+
2
0
•
E d c • k 7 .00
;
5 .00
+
3 .00
1 .00
7
1 .00
*
2
2
*
2
6
2
3
2
3
9
6
2
3
2
•
7
*
8
*
3
2
3
9
9
9
6
3
4
2
4
9
9
9
9
5
9
5
4
2
*
*
9
9
9
9
4
6
3
2
*
2
*
+
+ 6
3
3 .40
5 .80
8 .20
2
2
1 0.60 1 3.00 F LAKE T HICKNESS
a
1 5.40 ( MM)
R : 0 .47778 S ig : 0 .00000
V LASAC I II
F igure 1 6 ( cont'd) 1 91
1 7.80
2 0.20
2 2.60
10.00
+
9.00
+
8.00
+
7.00
+
!, 6.00
+
*
e-,
I
5.00
+
4.00
+
3.00
+
2.00
+
4
1.00
+5
*
e-,
*
*
*
* •
2
*
. +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+---- +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+---
1.00
3.40
5.80
8.20
10.60 13.00 15.40 FLAKE THICKNESS (MM)
R: 0.64083 Sig: 0.00049
VLASAC IV
Figure 16 (cont'd) 192
17.80
20.20
22.60
T ABLE 5 5 P LATFORM W IDTH A ND F LAKE T HICKNESS L evel
S lope o f R egression L ine
I ntercept
V lasac I
. 55296
. 18638
V lasac I I
. 46824
. 65542
V lasac I II
. 34163
1 .05396
S tar c v evo
. 26475
1 .60204
1 93
T ABLE 5 6 P LATFORM L ENGTH V S. P LATFORM W IDTH L evel
R
S ignificance
V lasac I
. 71655
0 .00000
V lasac I I
. 71605
0 .00000
V lasac I II
. 65160
0 .00000
S tarCevo
. 81273
0 .00000
T ABLE 5 7 R EGRESSION L INES F OR P LATFORM W IDTH ( VERTICAL A XIS) B Y P LATFORM L ENGTH ( HORIZONTAL AXIS)
L evel
S lope
I ntercept
V lasac I
. 28121
. 74196
V lasac I I
. 27453
. 75973
V lasac I II
. 24626
. 94085
S tarCevo
. 25685
. 83112
T ABLE 5 8 M EAN V ALUES F OR P LATFORM L ENGTH A ND W IDTH
M ean L evel
M ean
P latform L ength
P latform W idth
L ength/Width
V lasac I
9 .497
3 .413
2 .782
V lasac I I
9 .431
3 .349
2 .816
V lasac I II
8 .107
2 .937
2 .760
V S tarcevo
8 .783
3 .087
2 .845
1 94
The relationship between platform length and flake thickness is similar to, but weaker than, that between platform width and flake thickness. Values -0f R are lower, and the pattern of a minim�m value of thickness for a value of platform length is weakly expressed compared to the crystal clear pattern with platform width. Calculation of partial correlation coefficients for platform length with flake thickness while controlling for the intervening effects of platform width, show that the correlation between platform length and flake thickness is largely a spurious one (see Table 59) . Flake width is largely controlled by a combination of two v a r i a b les: platform length and flake thickness. The partial correlations make it clear that the correlation between flake width and platform width is a spurious one (see Tables 60 and 61 ). Flake width is most strongly affected by platform length, and secondarily by flake thickness. There is no change through time in the relative mean values of platform length or flake thickness compared to flake width (see below) . Turning finally to length, we find the least patterned of all the technological size variables (see Tables 62 and 63). The weak correlations of flake length with platform length and width are spurious, and the only slightly higher correlation with flake thickness and flake width are quite weak, although still generally significant, when p latform length and w idth a r e contro lled. T he p r im ar y determinants of flake length are none of these variables, although flake thickness and width do have a measurable influence. Speth (1981, p.17) has recently reported that platform angle (measured between •the striking platform and the exterior surface of the flake or core) is positively related to flake length. Others have reported the same res ult (Stothert, 1974, p.158; Dibble and Whittaker, 1981). Platform angle may also be related to flake width. This angle was unfortunately not measured in the present study. _ Crabtree (1972, p.12) reports that flakes are longer if the force of the blow has a central ridge or ridges to follow. Information on this was not collected, but it would be interesting to look at knapper's utilization of this effect (see discussion· of blades, above). Speth (1972, p.47) reports that flake length should depend on thickness and concludes that the " ••• attributes of flake size are highly redundant" (ibid, p.5 7). All of the attributes of flake size dealt with in this analysis are interrelated - some quite weakly. It would be inaccurate to say that they are all ''highly redundant". There is some change through time in the relative values of length, width and thickness. The mean of all three decreases through tim e. Inspection of the slopes of the regression lines and the intercepts of the seattergrams of length vs. width (horizontal) shows slope decreasing through the Mes ol ithic phas es, and inter cept increasing (Table 64). What these changing values mean is that the narrowest pieces are getting longer and the widest pieces are getting shorter through time. The range of variation in length is contracting. Slopes and intercepts for thickness versus length (horizontal) show decreasing slopes and increasing interce�ts (Table 65), meaning 195
T ABLE 5 9 P LATFORM L ENGTH V S. F LAKE T HICKNESS C orrelation B etween p latform l ength a nd f lake t hickness
P artial C orrelation C ontrolling f or p latform w idth
V lasac I
. 3476
. 0289
V lasac I I
. 50953
. 1509
V lasac I II
. 3215
. 1357
S tarCevo
. 7740
. 5661
T ABLE 6 0 S IMPLE C ORRELATIONS W ITH F LAKE W IDTH
P latform L ength
F lake T hickness
P latform W idth
V lasac I
. 57163
. 39457
. 45554
V lasac I I
. 59273
. 63335
. 44132
V lasac I II
. 58506
. 41439
. 36388
S tarcevo
. 84344
. 87847
. 73015
T ABLE 6 1 P ARTIAL C ORRELATIONS W ITH F LAKE W IDTH
L evel
P latform l ength c ontrolled f or t hickness a nd p latform w idth
F lake t hickness c ontrolled f or p latform l ength a nd w idth
P latform w idth c ontrolled f or p latform l ength a nd t hickness
V lasac I
. 3994
. 2424
0.0021
V lasac I I
. 4296
. 5048
0.1867
V lasac I II
. 4787
. 3056
0.0894
S tarcevo
. 3605
. 6659
0 .1625
1 96
T ABLE 6 2 S IMPLE C ORRELATIONS W ITH L ENGTH
L evel
T hickness
W idth
V lasac I
. 37760
. 43719
. 30364
. 37828
V lasac I I
. 50824
. 43501
. 33567
. 32532
V lasac I II
. 25734
. 18156
. 17000
. 14260
S tarCevo
. 76379
. 69322
. 73894
. 60300
P latform L ength
P latform W idth
T ABLE 6 3 P ARTIAL C ORRELATIONS W ITH L ENGTH
L evel
T hickness; c ontrol f or
W idth; c ontrol f or t hickness,
P latform l ength ;
P latform w idth;
w idth , p latform w idth a nd l ength
p latform w idth a nd p latform l ength
c ontrol f or t hickn ess,
c ontrol f or t hickn ess, w idth a nd p latform l ength
w idth a nd p latform w idth
A ll S p eriods
. 2222
. 1743
. 0074
. 0615
V lasac I
. 1822
. 2859
0.0761
. 1666
V ia -sac I I
. 2968
. 1366
. 0356
.0084
V lasac I II
. 1915
. 0418
. 0459
. 0053
S tarcevo
. 4376
.1577
. 3228
. 0169
197
T ABLE 6 4 L ENGTH V S. W IDTH
L evel
( HORIZONTAL)
S lope o f R egression L ine
Y I ntercept
V lasac I
. 46207
1 4.93919
V lasac I I
. 42926
1 6.01319
V lasac I II
. 21583
1 9.28874
vo S tarCie
. 61425
1.88056 1
T ABLE 6 5 T HICKNESS V S. L ENGTH
L evel
( HORIZONTAL)
S lope o f R egression L ine
Y I ntercept
V lasac I
. 18690
1 .80100
V lasac I I
. 17724
1 .81068
V lasac I II
. 10672
3 .27899
v S tarcevo
. 34316
1.68389
T ABLE 6 6 T HICKNESS
L evel
V lasac I V lasac I I V lasac I II v S tarcevo
( HORIZONTAL) V S. W IDTH
S lope o f R egression L ine
( VERTICAL)
YI ntercept
. 72633
1 2.50041
1 .56742
6 .97915
. 64486
1 0.94711
1 .85056
4 .52514
1 98
t hat t he r ange o f v ariation i n w idth i s c ontracting t hrough t ime . T he s hortest p ieces a re t hickening a nd t he l ongest p ieces a re g etting t hinner t hrough t ime. L ooking b ack a t m ean v alues f or t hickness a nd l ength f or e ach p eriod, mean l ength o verall d ecreases a v ery small amount t hrough t ime r elative t o mean t hickness. T he s lopes a nd i ntercepts f or t hickness v ersus width d o n ot ( Table 6 6).
s how a c onsistent p attern
T here a re n o s ubstantial c hanges t hrough t ime i n r elative mean v alues f or w idth a nd t hickness ( Table 6 7). A t t his p oint i t m ay b e u seful t o s ummarize what c an n ow b e s aid a bout t he c haracter o f t he main s ample o f c hipped s tone a t V lasac , a nd t he e vidence f or c hange t hrough t ime i n t he a ssemblage. G eneral T echnological C haracteristics O f T he C hipped S tone a t V lasac T he b ulk o f t he c hipped s tone d escribed i n t his s ection was o f f lint, 8 0% i n t he f irst two p hases, 8 7% i n p hases 3 a nd 4 , t he r emainder was q uartz,
7 -10% i n a ll p eriods a nd o ccasional p ieces o f
s iltstone , v olcanics a nd s ilicates . T he p ercentage o f material o ther t han f lint a nd q uartz d ecreases t hrough t ime . T he a pparent i ncrease i n f lint i s n ot r epresentative o f t he t otal s ample o f c hipped s tone f rom t he s ite, which i s 4 5.7% q uartz i n Vlasac I , a nd i ncreases t hrough t ime. A bout o ne-third o f a ll p ieces h ave s ome c ortex o n t hem , a nd 1 6-18% o f a ll f lakes h ave s cars o f t wo o r l ess p revious r emovals. T he mean n umber o f r emoval s cars i s 4 .1-4.3. The mean n umber o f s triking p latform f acets i s 1 .3-1.4 : 7 -11% o f a ll f lake p latform r emnants a re t otally c overed b y c ortex, a nd 6 0-64% h ave o nly o ne S tarlevo material i s a b it d ifferent i n t his r espect:
f acet. 1 7% o f
The t he
f lakes h ave p latforms t otally c overed with c ortex , 4 8% h ave o nly o ne f acet ( see T able 4 9) . A ll o f t hese a ttributes s uggest i n s itu f lint working o f p reviously u nmodified c ores a nd a bsence o f e laborate e fforts t o c ontrol t he o utcome o f k napping. F ourteen
t o
1 8% o f
a ll
f lakes
h ave
a l ip
p rotruding
f rom
t he
v entral f ace o f t he p latform. T his p ercentage j umps t o 4 3% i n S tärCevo . C oncommittently, t he p ercentage o ccurrence o f p latform e dge c rushing , o r a brading, which would r emove a l ip p rior t o d etaching a n ew f lake, i s c ommon i n Mesolithic V lasac, 4 4-51%, b ut d rops o ff i n S tar4 'evo t o 2 6%.
b ut
Twelve t o f ifteen p ercent o f a ll f lakes a re t runcated d istally, t he p ercentage o f t runcations which a ppear t o b e d eliberate j umps
f rom 3 7% i n V lasac I I t o 6 1% i n V lasac I II. Lateral e dge a ngles h ave u nimodal, n ormal d istributions with a triking p latform l ength a nd width, a nd o verall mean v alue o f 5 7 °. S f lake l ength, width a nd t hickness, a lso • h ave unimodal, n ormal d istributions. The m ean v alues f or a ll o f t hese measures d ecrease t hrough t ime. Relative mean v alues o f width/thickness a nd s triking
1 99
c n •
C V 0
. i . .
. . . 1 C9
e • • • 1
• • 1
r -1
L ( •
. 1. •
( 2 % 4.N .
C1 4. / 1
C1 41 /
CV
C9
C • 1 N. N. • C r l
/ 4 1 0 U CO • C r )
N. CI C 7 1 • C . 1
C r ) 4 '
CO . I 0 • /0 4 1
0 • 1 CO • 1 .-)
N. / 4 1 . 0 •
I n
0
L t 1 C1 / 4 . 1
40 / 1
CO •
i n r • •
0
t n 4C / 1 )
•
C Y 1 •
I A
0 o
c o • C1 /1 4 C N 1
h. • C1 /1 4 C1 /1 4
C1 4. / 1 C r ) • CV C1 / 4 1
V lasac I II
40 / 1
L n
V lasac I I
4. / 1 0
0 0 c o L t •
CO . 1
I A 4N •
V lasac I
C OMPARISON O F M EANS
C r ) N.
c o cq I J
•
c
• C Y ' )
r 1 / 4 . . . CO • t r
• 1 1 C1 / 4 1
0 C U
4 J C / D
p latform l ength/thickness a re c onstant. T he m ean v alue o f l ength r elative t o width a nd t o t hickness d oes c hange, i t i ncreases t hrough t ime. T here i s c learly n o s eparate m icro i ndustry, employing s mall c ores, o r e ven a s eparate b lade t echnology , a lthough t here a re c ertainly b oth m icroliths a nd b lades p resent. P latform l ength i s h ighly c orrelated with p latform width ( Pearson 's r = . 65 -.8 1) . T here i s n o p atterned c hange t hrough t ime i n s trength o f t his c orrelation . F lake width i s r elated t o p latform l ength a nd f lake t hickness. F lake w idth i s n ot c orrelated w ith p latform w idth . F lake l ength i s i nfluenced ( weak c orrelation) b y f lake width a nd t hickness. I t i s l argely d etermined b y o ther f actors n ot e xamined h ere. T he m ost i nteresting p attern t o e merge f rom t hese t echnological a ttributes i s t hat b etween s triking p latform w idth a nd f lake t hickness . T he v alue o f s triking p latform w idth d efines a m inimum v alue f or f lake t hickness which d oes n ot v ary t hrough t ime , a nd m ay r eflect a p hysical o r m echanical p rinciple . R elative t o p latform w idth , h owever , a verage f lake t hickness d oes i ncrease t hrough t ime. T he k ey s ize d imension a ppears t o b e p latform w idth, a v ariable l argely c ontrolled b y t he knapper . A model o f f lake s ize a nd p roportion i s s uggested b y t hese d ata, a nd s hown h ere a s F igure 1 7. A n umber o f v ariables s how c hange t hrough t ime i n t he V lasac m aterial i n a ddition t o t hose a lready m entioned . S everal v ariables s uggest i ncreasing c arelessness i n k napping t echnique . T he p ercentage o f c urved a nd t wisted f lakes i ncrease t hrough t ime ( % c urved a nd t wisted, V lasac I -IV : 1 0-13-15-28%) a lthough c ore s ize d oes n ot d ecrease . T he p ercentage o f p ieces where t he s triking p latform i s u nidentifiable b ecause i t h as b een d etached , o r p erhaps b ecause t here n ever w as o ne , i ncreases ( Platform a bsent o r c an 't t ell : 2 4-26-34-41%) . I n t he M esolithic p eriod b ulbs o f p ercussion a re a bsent o n f lakes which d o h ave p latforms i ncreasingly-frequently . I n t he S tarcevo m aterial t he b ulbs i ncrease a gain ( Presence o f b ulb o f p ercussion , V lasac I -IV : 4 4%-38%-36%-41%) . I t s hould b e e mphasized t hat l ack o f o r d ecreasing s kill i n f lint working i s n ot a n i ssue h ere . A lmost h alf o f t he c hipped s tone i n V lasac I , i s q uartz, a nd t his i ncreases t o 6 4% i n V lasac I II . A ccording t o C rabtree ( 1967a , p .11) m uch s kill i s r equired t o m ake a nything f rom t his m aterial . T he p ercentage o f p ieces which s uggest t he l ustre o f h eat t reatment j umps f rom 5 3 t o 7 1% f rom V lasac I t o I I , t hen g oes t o 6 9% i n V lasac I II a nd 6 4% i n V lasac I V . I t i s l ikely t hat m uch o f t his l ustre i s a n i nherent q uality o f t he f lint, b ut t he j ump i n f requency f rom V lasac I t o I I m ay m ark t he b eginning o f h eat t reatment. U tilization o f h eat t reatment w ould m ark a n e ffort t o g ain g reater p recision i n t he knapping process, i n c ontrast t o t he e vidence o f i ncreasing c arelessness m entioned a bove . P latform e dge a brasion o r c rushing a lso i s e vidence o f c areful k napping , a nd i ncreases i n t he M esolithic , t hen d rops o ff i n S tarCevo ( 44-48-51-26%) . Another p ossible s ign o f c arefulness i s t he d ecreased n umber o f p ieces w ith c ortex t hrough t ime, w hich m ay i ndicate i nitial t rimming o f n odules b efore r eturning t o the s ite t o k nap t hem . T he d ecrease i n t he M esolithic i s s light ( 35-34-30-
2 01
C D
m l
C D
t C D 0 r f l ) C D 0
rt
C D
t 1 3 0 9
5 H.
a )
r t
( ITT IOMINOD AT IVLLdVd
a Du e liodmi
I I I I
X C A •
: NOLL2 10c IOUd G I \ IV
1 1 1PT I A
1 11 0
P
2I d
d s a l a o T a d r e e t a
S N O S N I A D a
/ C 1
I d
G ä r lIO UNOD
T IHM
s a uavä
u oTsuaqv t a iojquId
A LI 0 J
2 6%), b ut when o ne i solates t he f lint, t he c hange i n p ercentage o f p ieces w ith c ortex i s i ncreased: 3 8.4-37.8-30.6-29.4%. The g reatest c hange i n p ercentage o f p ieces with c ortex c omes b etween V lasac I I a nd I II. S everal o ther v ariables c hange most d ramatically a t t his j uncture: p latform a bsent o r c an't t ell, mean p latform l ength a nd width, a nd f lake width d ecrease, d eliberate t runcation o f d istal e nd i ncreases. I n a ddition, f or many o f t he c orrelations b etween v arious d imensions o f f lakes, t he c orrelations f or V lasac I II m aterial a re w eaker t han f or t he o ther p eriods . P erhaps t he o ccupational h iatus i s g reater b etween V lasac I I a nd I II t han b etween V lasac I a nd I I, i f t here w as o ne b etween I a nd I I. T he m ean v alues o f a ll d imensions o f f lakes, p latform a nd o verall s ize d ecreases t hrough t ime r ather s moothly. A lso t he mean l ength t o m ean width r atio d ecreases t hrough t ime:
f lakes a re g etting s quarer.
The i nadequate s ample s ize f or S tarCevo h as b een r epeatedly m entioned h ere . L ooking a t a ll o f t hese a ttributes a nd t heir c hanging v alues t hrough t ime, 1 )
An
t hree o bservations
i nteresting avenue
t o
c an b e m ade:
e xplore
would
b e
t he
p ossible
l ink
b etween t he n ature ( variables i nvolved) a nd d irection o f c hanges f rom V lasac I t hrough I II a nd t he i ncreased u tilization o f q uartz d uring t hat t ime , f rom 4 6 t o 6 4% o f a ll c hipped s tone . A s q uartz b ecame m ore a nd more d ominant, i ts physical properties may have r equired m odifications o f k napping s tyle which w ere t hen c arried o ver i nto t he w orking o f
f lint .
C rabtree
( 1973a) h as
o bserved
i n a s tudy
o f H ohokam
p oints t hat d ifferent p oint s tyles were m ade o ut o f d ifferent m aterials a nd s peculated t hat t he s pecial t echniques r equired t o f inish d ifferent p oints m ight b e m ore e asily a pplied t o s ome m aterials t han t o o thers. T he f irst s tep would b e e xperimentation i n k napping a nd h eat t reating , a nd s ubsequently u sing q uartz a rtifacts. V irtually n othing i s k nown a bout t he p roperties o f t his material. C rabtree ( 1972, p .5) h as s aid t hat " crude" t ools m ay b e m ade w ith g reat s kill o n p oor m aterial . B ut a c rude-looking t ool m ay b e a v ery e ffective o ne . T he g reat p opularity o f q uartz s uggests t hat i t m ust h ave m ade e ffective , e fficient t ools. T he g reat p roperty o f q uartz i s i ts e dge d urability ( J. Adovasio, p .c.). 2 ) Without d iscussing t he r elative i mportance o f t echnology, s tyle a nd f unction i n t hese a ttributes , o ne c an p oint t o t he g eneral l ack o f a brupt a nd d rastic c hanges. 3 ) T here a re o nly t wo p laces i n a ll t hese d ata w here t here a re s harp c hanges -p resence o f l ip c hanges f rom 1 6% t o 4 3% a nd p latform e dge a brasion c hanges f rom 5 1% t o 2 6% b etween V lasac I II a nd S tar evo. S ince t hese t wo a ttributes a re l ogically i nversely r elated, t hey c ould r eally b e v iewed a s o nly a s ingle a brupt e vidence f or c hange -b e i t t echnological, We k now
f unctional, t hat
t his
was
o r s tylistic. a p eriod
o f
s ome
c hange
i n
t he
s ubsistence
b ase. I f c hipped s tone was g enerally d irectly u sed i n s ubsistence t asks, t he amount o f a brupt c hange s o f ar i solated i s s urprisingly l ittle . p erhaps
T his t he
small amount
i ntial
d egree
o f o f
t echnological s ubsistence
2 03
s tyle
c hange
s uggests
t ransformation h as
a lso
t hat b een
o ver-rated. Although
i t
s tone s uggests V lasac, i t i s s uggesting
an
i s
c ertainly
p remature
t o a ssess
what
t he c hipped
about t he h istory o f t he f our-phase h abitation n ot i nappropriate t o i nterpret t hese r esults h ypothesis
o f
n o
d iscontinuity
o r
r eplacement
o f a s o r
i ntroduction o f f oreign s tone-working t echnology t hroughout t he V lasae s equence . T his h ypothesis would b e i ndependent o f a ny a ssumption o f a d irect
f unctional
l ink b etween c hipped s tone a nd
s ubsistence.
T he
i nitial h ypothesis o f c ultural c ontinuity i n t he I ron Gates f rom t he middle
p ost-Pleistocene
d omesticated
c attle,
d omesticated g rains
i s
u p
p igs
t o and
a nd
t hrough
sheep/goats
s upported.
204
t he and
i ntroduction
o f
inferentially,
S quare 5 23 D ESCRIPTION O F A TTRIBUTES The
f ollowing
a ttributes
were
r ecorded
f or
t he
s econd
c hipped s tone, r epresenting all t he material f rom o ne, metre
s quare,
c hosen
b ecause
i t
c ontained
material
s ample
o f
c entral 4 x 4 f rom
a ll
f our
o ccupations. A GE -A ssignment s ite , t his
o f e ach a rtifact
o n t he b asis o f
t o o ne o f
t he e xcavator 's
t he f our o ccupations o f t he
i nterpretation o f
s tratigraphy
i n
s quare.
P ROVENIENCE -V ertical p rovenience, MATERIAL -T he t ype o f a dditional t ype,
s tone was
l imestone,
w as
b y
l evels,
r ecorded ,
a s
f or s quare. f or p revious
s amples .
An
f ound h ere.
H EATED -A s a bove. C ORTEX -A s c rumbly, C OLOR
a bove ,
e xcept
t hat
r olled s urfaces
r ough m atrix a dhering t o n odules
-A
t otal
o f
1 5
c olors
were
were d istinguished f rom
r emoved f rom o utcrops.
r ecognized:
white;
" StarCevo"
b eige--a vp ale b eige f lint with whitish d apples i n i t, widely u sed i n t he S tarcevo p eriod; " StarCevo" g rey; grey; d ark g rey; g rey-black; mottled b rown ; mottled g rey; r ed; b eige-brown ; d ark b rown ; o ver-heated b rown-white--a b rown f lint e venly d iscolored t o white a round t he e dges, which l ooked l ike h eat-treatment d iscoloration ; g reen ;
t ransluscent-clear.
P LATFORM -A s a bove. B ULB -A s
a bove.
L IP -A s a bove. P LATFORM C RUSHING -A s
a bove.
P LATFORM FACETS -A s a bove. P LATFORM L ENGTH -A s a bove. P LATFORM W IDTH -A s a bove. MAXIMUM L ENGTH -A s a bove. MAXIMUM W IDTH -A s a bove. T HICKNESS -A s a bove. TRUNCATED -A s a bove. D ELIBERATE -A s
a bove.
2 05
o ver-heated g rey-white;
P ROXIMAL T RUNCATION -P roximal e nd r emoved o r n ot. D ELIBERATE P ROXIMAL T RUNCATION -Y es o r n o. N UMBER O F R EMOVALS -A s a bove. TYPE -T ypes r ecognized were: c an't t ell; s hatter; b locky s hatter; c ore; f lake; b lade; c ore f ragment; f lake o r b lade f ragment; c ore r ejuvenation f lake. C URVED -D oes
t he d istal e nd c urve b ack t owards
t he v entral s urface?
TWISTED -Is t he a rtifact t wisted o ff t he 2 -dimensional p lane f ormed b y i ts l ong a xis a nd a l ine d rawn p erpendicular t o t hat a xis a cross t he e dge o f t he s triking p latform? R ETOUCH/USE -Is a rtifact r etouched/used? I n a ddition , m anufacturing
t he n umber o f f lint c hips, p ieces c onsidered t o b e d ebris, was c ounted f or e ach l evel . Q uartz w as c ounted
s eparately i n t he S ummary d ata s et. A NALYSIS O F D ATA S quare 5 23 o riginally c ontained 7 15 p ieces o f c hipped s tone, d isposed a s s hown i n T able 6 8. T he materials l eft i n t he f ield b ags a re t he s ubject o f t his p art o f t he a nalysis. T he o ther m aterials f rom S quare 5 23 h ave b een p reviously d escribed i n t he a nalysis o f t he P rimary d ata s et. T he t echnological v ariables e xamined f or t he p rimary d ata s et will b e r ecalculated f or t hese d ata a s a t est o f t he r epresentativeness o f t he P rimary d ata s et. T hen , a n a ttempt w ill b e m ade t o e stimate t he p ercentage o f t ools w hich were r etouched a nd/or u sed b y c omparing what was s orted o ut i nto t he P rimary d ata s et with w hat w as l eft b ehind i n t he f ield b ags. T able 6 9 c ontains t he f requencies f or v arious t echnological a ttributes p reviously c alculated f or t he P rimary d ata s et. The p atterns o f s everal v ariables, i ncluding d istal b reak, c ortex , b ulb, p latform e dge c rushing , c urving/twisting , a nd l ip a re t he s ame a s was f ound f or t he Primary d ata s et ( compare t hese d ata with T able 4 9). A n umber o f v ariables p attern d ifferently i n S quare 5 23 t han t hey d id i n t he P rimary d ata. A s maller p ercentage o f t he material l ooks h eatt reated
i n S quare
5 23,
t he
p latform
i s
m ore
f requently
a bsent ,
d istal
t runcations l ess f requently a ppeared d eliberate, t he m ean n umber o f p latform f acets i s l ess, a nd t he mean n umber o f p revious r emovals i s l ess. S ome o f t hese d ifferences may r eflect d irect s electivity o f s orters--glossy a rtifacts " look l ike s omething" a s d o a rtifacts w ith a l arger n umber o f r emoval s cars. I t i s u nlikely t hat t he n umber o f p latform f acets w ould b e s elected f or d irectly--this a ttribute i s t oo d ifficult
t o
s ee .
M ore
l ikely
i t
l ike t he o ccurrence o f r etouch,
i s
a ssociated w ith
a nd was
o ther a ttributes,
s elected f or a s a s econdary
e ffect. E ach
a rtifact
was
c oded
d ifferent c olors were r ecognized .
f or
c olor,
Many o f
2 06
a nd
a t otal
o f
f ifteen
t hese o ccurred o nly i n s mall
T ABLE 6 8 D ISPOSITION O F S QUARE 5 23 C HIPPED S TONE
D isposition
V lasac I
V lasac I I
V lasac I II
V lasac 0
M aterial s orted o ut b y e xcavators
7
2 5
2 1
c hipped s tone
2
1 1
c ores & c ore f ragments
2
2 7
1 3
7 3
3 33
1 98
8 4
3 96
2 32
1
S orted o ut b y a uthor:
R emaining i n f ield b ags T otal
2 07
2
3
T ABLE 6 9 S QUARE 5 23:
F REQUENCIES O F T ECHNOLOGICAL A TTRIBUTES
V lasac I ( 73) n o. %
V lasac I I n o. %
( 333)
V lasac I II n o.
%
1 0
5
M aterial c an't
t ell
f lint
4 6 9
s iltstone
-
5
1 3
9 5
3 19
-
1
4 9 6
1 88
9 5
0
H eated n one
3 1
4 2
1 70
5 1
9 8
4 9
g lossy
4 2
5 8
1 58
4 7
9 7
4 9
-
5
5 9
20 2
7
1 0
2 1
6
1 5
8
1 1
2 7
8
2 0
1 6
5 3
s palls
-
2
3
2
C ortex a bsent
4 3
c an't k ind
t ell
c an't
t ell
p ebble d eposit
1 2 3
4
w hite
2
3
v S tarcevo b eige
4
5
v S tarcevo g rey
2
3 .
1 2
6 6
1 22
1 6 4
1 4 .
2 7
6 2
8 1 0 7 1 4
C olor
g rey d ark g rey g rey-black
1 7 9 2 2
6
2
4
2
1 2
4
3
2
1 4
4
5
3
2 3
8 7
2 6
7 2
3 6
1 2
8 8
2 6
4 4
2 2
3 0
3 9
1 2
1 0
2 08
5
( 198)
T ABLE 6 9 V lasac I ( 73) n o. %
( Cont'd)
V lasac I I n o. %
( 333)
V lasac I II n o. %
C olor m ottled b rown
4
5
1 2
m ottled g rey
4
5
3 3
r ed
-
b eige-brown
6
8
d ark b rown
1
1
o verheated b rown-white
1
1
o verheated g rey-white
1
1
-
4 1 0
6 2 1
3 1
4
1
2
1
1
3
8
4
8
2
2
1
3
1
4
2
1 0
3
g reen
3
1
t ranslucent c lear
3
1
1 6 1
8 1
P latform a bsent
5
7
5 7
1 7
3 4
1 7
u ncertain
4 3
5 9
1 69
5 1
1 03
5 2
p resent
2 5
3 4
1 07
3 2
6 1
3 1
a bsent
4 0
5 5
2 50
7 5
1 43
7 3
p resent
3 3
4 5
8 3
2 5
5 2
2 7
3 6
8 4
1 53
9 1
9 3
8 8
1 6
1 6
1 3
1 2
4 4
8 9
6 1
5 8
B ulb
L ip a bsent p resent
7
9
C rush a bsent
1 9
2 09
5 3
( 198)
T ABLE 6 9 V lasac I ( 73) n o. %
( Cont'd)
V lasac I I n o. %
( 333)
V lasac I II (198) no. %
C rush p resent
2 4
5 6
8 0
4 7
4 5
4 2
1 4
2 3
1 4
1 6
1 5
5 6
1 20
7 1
6 5
6 2
2 1
2 0
1 2
1 5
1 4
F acets 0
6
1
2 4
2
9
3
4
4
-
9 -
M ean = 1 .256
3 3
2
6
6
2
3
3
M ean = 1 .071
M ean = 1 .190
D istal B reak a bsent
5 0
6 9
2 5.6
7 8
1 57
p resent
1 5
2 1
3 9
1 2
1 7
7
1 0
3 5
1
2 4
1 2
n o
9
6 4
2 8
7 2
1 4
8 2
y es
4
2 9
1 0
2 6
c an't t ell
1
7
1
1
1
-
s hatter
4
5
2 0
c hunks
2
1
3 1
c an't t ell
7 9 9
D eliberate
3
1 8
3
T ype c an't
t ell
f lakes
5 3
-
6
3
6
1 4
7
9
2 8
1 4
7 3
2 18
6 5
9 8
4 9
1 1
3 9
1 2
3 9
2 0
b lades
8
f lake/blade f ragment
4
5
1 5
5
c ore r ejuvena tion f lake
2
3
1 0
3
210
1 2
1
6
1
T ABLE 6 9 V lasac I ( 73) n o. %
( Cont'd)
V lasac I I n o. %
( 333)
V lasac I II n o.
%
1
1
P revious R emovals 0
-
1
2
-
3
1
3
1 7
5
1
6
2
1 5
2 1
5 6
1 7
3 4
1 7
3
2 0
2 7
1 18
3 5
5 3
2 7
4
1 8
2 5
7 4
2 2
5 0
2 5
1 2
3 1
9
2 8
1 4
1 9
6
1 2
5
9
6
3
4
7
4
5
8
-
9
2
1 0
-
3 -
M ean = 3 .740
7 6 2 -
6
2
8
2
-
-
1
-
-
-
M ean = 3 .492
1
4
1
M ean = 3 .616
C urved a bsent
5 6
8 5
24 2
8 1
1 41
8 2
p resent
1 0
1 0
5 2
1 9
3 0
1 8
5 9
8 9
2 41
8 7
1 50
8 8
1
3 5
1 3
2 1
1 2
8 8
2 80
8 4
1 89
1 2
5 3
1 6
1 6.6
8 2
2 0.7
T wist a bsent p resent
7
R etouched/ U sed a bsent p resent c orrected p resent
6 4 9
1 4
2 11
9
2 6
9 5.5 4 .5
1.2
( 198)
numbers in all three occupations, but four varieties of grey: grey, d a rk gre y, gre y -black, and mottled gre y, accounted for larg e percentages of the materials, and their frequencies changed through time. Possible change through time in color preferences of local materials is suggested by these data. It is a question which could easily be studied in the Iron Gates sites. The two colors most common V V in the Starcevo period--Starcevo grey and beige--occurred but were not common in all three occupations at Vlasac. Mean values for several continuous variables are shown in Table 70. All mean values for all periods are lower for Square 523 than for the Primary data set. In the Primary data set, the mean values for all of these variables decrease through time. In Square 523 the mean values decrease from Vlasac I to II, but then increase again in Vlasac III, although not up to the mean values of Vlasac I. The explanation for these differences may lie in the percentage of artifacts judged to have been used or retouched in Square 523 (see Table 69). In Vlasac I 16.6%, in Vlasac II, 20.7%, and in Vlasac III, 11.2% of the artifacts could be seen to have been used or retouched without the aid of a microscope. If retouched/used artifacts were larger than other artifacts, this could account for the differences in continuous variables noticed above. We will return to this question below. The original sort of the material pulled seven artifacts from Vlasac I in Square 523, none of which were retouched, three of which were used. My search turned up 11 retouched/used pieces. (Retouch and use were not distinguished here because it was felt that they could not be reliably distinguished without the use of the microscope. I have assumed that these pieces are essentially equal to those classified as retouched or possibly retouched in the Primary analysis). Twenty-five artifacts were pulled for Vlasac II, of which ten were used and eight were retouched. I identified a further 64 used/retouched artifacts. For Vlasac III, 21 artifacts were sorted out for the Primary data set. Sixteen were used and one was retouched. I identified nine additional retouched/used artifacts. Assuming that I did not miss any retouched artifacts, or artifacts used heavily enough to show use without a microscope, than the original sorters found 3/14, 18/82, and 17/26 of the.· "tools" in Vlasac I, II, and III respectivelr, or 21%, 21%, and 65%. It had been hoped that these figures could be used to estimate the percentage of retouched/used artifacts in the total assemblage. They are too wildly variable to be of much use. The anomalous value for Vlasac III may be partly explained by the fact that a lower p ercentage of Vlasac III material was used/retouched in Square 523 (11.2%) than in the Vlasac I (16.6%) or Vlasac II (20.7%) levels of that square. As artifacts were sorted, a run of "debitage" would cause iorters to look more carefully at each piece and thereby recover a higher percentage of the retouched pieces. Recovery was probably consistently better in areas of the site where the density of "tools" was lowest, and the reverse. This bias, if it operated, would tend to smooth out differences in the density distribution of "tools". An average of the three recovery rates, 35.66%, is the best estimate available. Using this figure, we derive the predictions for total numbers of used/retouched pieces shown in Table 71. Whatever the actual recovery rate was, it can be seen that the percentage of retouched and probably retouched pieces recovered covaries very tightly 212
T ABLE 7 0 M EAN V ALUES F OR C ONTINUOUS V ARIABLES
V lasac I
V lasac I I
7 .302
6 .663
6 .829
. 411
1 .138
1 .776
2 .837
2 .604
2 .743
. 787
1 .135
1 .836
1 9.658
1 8.231
1 8.833
1 .276
. 946
1 .081
1 4.356
1 2.640
1 3.258
. 599
. 981
1 .462
5 .164
4 .940
5 .061
. 493
. 729
1 .014
V lasac I II
P latform l ength M ean S kewness P latform w idth M ean S kewness L ength M ean S kewness W idth M ean S kewness T hickness M ean S kewness
T ABLE 7 1 P REDICTED O CCURRENCE O F R ETOUCHED/USED A RTIFACTS
N o. S quare 5 23
r etouched/
u sed p ieces f ound -
3 5.66% r ecovery r ate: n o. p redicted
% o f t otal n on-quartz
V lasac I
1 09
3 08
1 4.7
V lasac I I
28 2
6 45
1 5.7
V lasac I II
1 73
4 89
1 5.7
213
with t he t otal n umber o f a rtifacts t hroughout t he s equence. T hese e stimates c ould b e r elatively e asily c hecked b y a r e-examination o f t he d ata.
2 14
S ummary D ata S et D ESCRIPTION O F A TTRIBUTES T he f ollowing v ariables w ere r ecorded f or t he S ummary d ata s et: 1 .
A GE:
2 .
P ROVENIENCE:
3 .
F LAT Q UARTZ : N umber o f f lat, p ossibly s truck , q uartz w ith u sable c utting e dges, p er p rovenience u nit.
4 .
A s a bove.
B LOCKY
A s a bove.
Q UARTZ:
N umber
o f
q uartz
c hunks
o r
u nusable
p ieces
s hatter
p er p rovenience u nit. 5 .
C HIPS:
N umber o f f lint
c hips p er p rovenience u nit.
6 .
M ATERIAL:
7 .
C ORTEX:
8 .
T YPE: C an't t ell; s hatter; b locky s hatter; c ore; c ore f ragment; f lake-blade f ragment; f lake, b lade, r ejuvenation f lake.
9 .
A SSOCIATED A RCHAEOLOGICAL F EATURE : N umber o f g rave , h earth , o r h ouse f loor w ith which a rtifact i s a ssociated, i f a ny.
A s a bove. P resent o r a bsent.
A NALYSIS O F D ATA T he S ummary d ata s et i ncludes a ll o f t he c hipped s tone r ecovered f rom t he s ite , m inus t he 6 04 n on-quartz p ieces o f m aterial f rom S quare 5 23 and t he 2 042 p ieces i n t he P rimary d ata s et. T here a re 2 2,201 a rtifacts c hips
i n
( tiny
t he S ummary d ata f ragments
o f
s et .
f lint
T here w ere p roduced
i n
a lso a s mall n umber o f t he
knapping
p rocess)
a ssociated with e ach o ccupation : V lasac I , 3 3 c hips; V lasac I I, 4 5 c hips; a nd V lasac I II, 6 2 c hips. T able 7 2 s hows , t he r aw t otals o f d ifferent k inds o f materials u sed f or c hipping d uring t he d ifferent o ccupations . S everal t hings a re o bvious f rom t hese d ata . F irst, t he t otal amount o f c hipped s tone more t han d oubles f rom Vlasac I t o I I, a nd t hen s tays a bout t he s ame f or V lasac I II. T he u tilization o f q uartz i ncreases t hrough t he t hree l evels, f rom a l ow o f 5 4 t o a h igh o f 7 1 p ercent. The r emainder o f u nidentifiable, a nd o ther o dd m aterials, s uch a s s iltstone, a nd s ilicious r ocks, a lso d ecrease t hrough t ime. T his m ight b e s een a s e vidence f or a c ontinuous e xperimentation with l ocally a vailable s tone o ther t han f lint f or c hipping , d ecreasing t hrough t ime a s t he c hoice n on-flint r aw m aterial b ecame m ore e ntrenched. I n s pite o f
t he s teady a nd s ignificant
o f
q uartz
a s
t he
m ain
r elative d ecline i n t he u se
o f f lint t hrough t ime, i ts u tilization a s r eflected b y t he d ebris o f manufacture a nd t he p roducts o f m anufacture d oes n ot s eem t o h ave c hanged a t a ll . T able 7 3 s hows t he b reakdown o f k napping p roducts f or e ach
l evel
o f
t he
s ite.
I t
i s
c lear
2 15
t hat
t here
h as
b een n o
c hange
, I
X
L c ) C O • en V : p
.2 0 • se en
‘ . ▪ 0 v I
c0
0 V ; ) • C V N-
CT C , 1 • r CV
• O
V lasac I V
•
t i 2 I
• 1
O
e n
CO 0 • 0
ON C I O
0
Cq v 4 • 0
el
en
C q
CO I 01 * 4I U.) C1I
CV . 1 -
I
I
I
. I -
I
I
C N I
I Cn h-
s xI
• 0
t > 2 I
o S o
•
CT VD L f )
C C I )
•
c v
0 00 • d -
( e l u l • ( I r e l
‘ , C, 0 • C
01 0 • 0
—i 0 • 0
L r ) I f )
L r l
c n
7 4
CO C • 1
( N
t i Z I
o • o
L . r-1
C • 1
el , 4 • . 1L t-)
c 0 0 • C V I-
CO N-
C I " )
I
r * 00 - I I -2 ' I 0 CO
en 0 . 0
I
1 -
I I I I
en 4 ' CV CO
U ' l r • • . CI
• c N
I 0 c n
Ie n
C J
C / 3
M aterial 0
0
V olcanic
Material
V lasac I
V lasac I I
— 4
S c o
S iltstone
L EVELS A T V LASAC
r z 2
D ISTRIBUTION O F RAW MATERIALS
› i
4 . ) 0
C • O X
c o C O
C \ I 0 S
I
C T 0\ •
h . •
c
L t
o
4
0
• c n
L s " ) in
0 00
0
L i )
-
0 0
0 0 •
o
s e
•
•
V D N. • 0
N .
% J D c 0 S i n
c : 0
V D
• c .
1 •
C . )
N
•I
N
O C
N. VD c r )
0
•
• L r )
0
C O C o 0
0
. 1 0
. 1c e )
I 1 I 1
i n
0
0
0
c0 CN
I
N .
1 I C : h
0 11
c : 7 % se • se
Cn
c . ) C O
r -1
. 10
4 0 . 0
N co • V D
L . r ,
c v • 0
o h
c‚ l c n
4
se • vI
7I
0
.0
i n
. 4
▪•
rf
94
\O
r -I
• 0
C O C " ) c CO
C C ) ✓.. 4
1 I
• c o
r n
l0 0
C n
0
-
0
C O
C
t n
•
C
1 N . tn I cn N
0 0 N . • s e
0 0 N. • c o
C l 0 • i n
0 " , . , S ©
0
N c l •
N , 4 •
en
P -1
PI
. 1-
c0 •
L .r 1
r 1
01
•
c n 0
•
rI
, . 0
c . )H C O C . o1
c o
r
•
o p
0
r -I
Ch
en 1 4
i n i n
NI
.0 -4-
a ,
e o zs c n
. / * a , N .
N. C
0 1 N c n 1 0
CT
N
, V D • . 1-
E 1
. 0 N . • 0 0
v ) i C T
i n 0 • r 4
a ,
N .
f -f
' - ' 1
• • C >
• c V
. 4 . 1 .• N t n
< 3 V Z • Ch
t n V D • 0
t hrough
t ime
i n
t he
p ercentages
o f
p ieces
with
c ortex ,
i n
t he
p ercentage o utput o f f lakes, b lades, o r a ny o ther t ype o f d ebris. T able 7 4 s hows t his b reakdown b y o ccupation f or e ach t ype o f m aterial. C ORTEX About 1 /3 o f a ll p ieces i n a ll t hree l evels h ad c ortex a ttached ( Table 7 3). S lopes o f s cattergrams o f c ortex b y e ach c ategory o f c hipping p roduct g ive a p retty a ccurate m easure o f t he p ercentages o f e ach c ategory o f c hipped s tone with c ortex . V lasac I h as a h igh p ercentage o f c ores ( 75) with c ortex , a nd a bout 1 /3 o f t he c ore f ragments h ave c ortex . A t hird o f t he f lakes, b ut o nly a q uarter o f t he b lades h ave c ortex . A ll o f t hese r elationships with c ortex h ave s ignificant P earson's r . T his c ould p ossibly b e a r eflection o f a manufacturing s tyle, b ased o n a g reat a bundance, a nd e asy a ccess t o, r aw m aterial , where m any c ores were d iscarded without b eing e xhausted , and/or where t he t endency was t o e xploit a ll c ores i nitially f or f lakes, a nd o nly when t hey h ad g otten r ather small t o e xploit t hem f or b lades. T his would b e r eflected i n t he smaller p ercentage o f b lades which h ave c ortex , a s o pposed t o f lakes. I f t his was t he c ase, t hen t he a verage s ize o f b lades s hould b e l ess t han t hat o f f lakes, a nd f urther , b lade s cars s hould b e f ound mostly o n t he s maller c ores . T he c orrelation b etween c ore r ejuvenation f lakes a nd c ortex i s n egative, b ut i t i s a lso n ot s ignificant. The s lope i s a lso s lightly n egative. T his m akes s ense , h owever , s ince o nly t he h eavily w orked c ore w ould b e r ejuvenated , a nd o ne w ould n ot o ften e xpect t o f ind c ortex o n a h eavily worked c ore. A small p ercentage o f t he f lake-blade f ragments h ave c ortex ( slope = . 2) b ut t his i s a lso n ot a s ignificant c orrelation ( sample s ize = 1 7). P erhaps t hese f ragments were p roduced i n t he p reparation o f microliths, t he b lanks f or which might b e s elected d eliberately without c ortex? R ather h igh p ercentages ( 46 a nd 3 4, r espectively), o f t he f lat s hatter a nd b locky s hatter h ave c ortex . T his m ay r eflect t he a ccuracy o f c lassifying t hese p ieces a s s hatter , a s o ne would e xpect r ather h igh p ercentages o f c ortex o n p ieces p roduced b y s mashing u p l arge n odules t o g et s maller , w orkable p ieces. R andom smashing o f c hunks t o g et f ortuitous p latforms, a nd c omfortable s ized c ores, w ould a lso b e a r eflection o f a n i ndustry i n w hich t here was n o c oncern d isplayed f or e fficient e xploitation o f r aw m aterial . The c ortex p ercentages o f c hipped s tone c ategories v ary i n t he s ame d irection i n V lasac I I, t he m ain d ifference i s t hat t he v alues a re more e xtreme. More o f t he two t ypes o f s hatter h ave c ortex ( .60 a nd . 40) ,
a nd
t he d ifference b etween f lakes a nd
b lades
i s
m ore
e xtreme
( . 48
v s. . 15). T he o nly r eal d ifference i s t hat a lmost 1 /2 o f t he c ore f ragments h ave c ortex . T he n umber o f c ores i s t oo small t o g ive meaningful r esults. I n a ccordance with t he c ore f ragments h aving c ortex , • the p ercentage o f r ejuvenation f lakes which h ave c ortex h as g one t o . 21, f rom t he p revious n egative r elationship, a lthough t he n umber o f c ases i s s till t oo s mall f or r eliability . T his m ight r eflect a g reater w illingness t o m ake u se o f f lakes w ith c ortex o n t hem , i n t he n ame o f more e fficient u se o f r aw material. I f t his i s t he c ase, t he p ercentage o f t he t otal c hipped s tone w hich i s s hatter s hould d ecrease f rom i ts v alue i n V lasac I . B locky s hatter d oes d ecrease , f rom 9 t o 5 % ( see Table 7 3).
2 18
I 4 . ) a ) ' V " O c l ) 4 1 9 1
. -I
C O c N i , 1
O N e i
C T
t r )
v . -A
I
I
I
k r ) 0 3
v z , 1 C
I
I
e l
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
e l
I
I
I
I
L n
4
I
I
1 -
I
I
I
C r )
I
I
I
I
4
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -
C r )
CO
v . ) N . . 1 -
N . L. r )
I
I
( 7 , C V
I
I
I
I
I
1
CD
C O
• ? 1
V lasac I I
C O C . ) e t 1 r I 9 1 C / 3
1
C ) 1 9 1 r I 0 ct > U
I a ) 4 r 1 0 4 4 ) 4 C A Cl )
1
1
i . -
N . i ) I
c l i Z CY
4 4 -
-4 ' vO r . C V
/ 4 1 0 \. 0 . 0
4 ' C N 1
N. C r )
0 0 1 ,4
0 L t c N
-4 " -4 -
ON cq
C O cr %
e l Cr )
. .1
( N 1 cp r`..
. -4
ON 1C \ I
. -4
TABLE
7 4
4 1 • • r 4 r I
I
I 4 ) " I C 4 1
V lasac I
•
( 1 ) • r 1
. 1 "
e \I
, i
. i
1
C ' , 1
I A CO
C N 1
1 • 4
I
. -4
" H
C ) I •. I T I O C O > C)
N 4 i
, 4
1 4 -
I
1 -
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, . 4
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
. -1
S I
N.
, 4
C U
-. 1-
rn
I
, 1
0 '.
9 1
c, , j
. . I
L r)
r D
-I P-
C r )
c : i C . 1
0 i n
V D
c n -4
1 — i
CO
L.C 1
-4 "
L t )
CI
I . 4
0 1
CO
, 1
N .
0 C ,1
I
I
0 . 4
. -4
.-I
14
3 4 C U 4 . ) 4 ) c o
T H a ) . 1 ) g l
C l )
P L . • , I p Z C . )
C D „ i n Z
X
(1 ) 4 ) 1 4 0 . C )
4 . ) c o C. J
a ) E t o c e
cn } . 4
a ) 4 ) 4 ) cd " C C l )
g l
› , ,. 2 C . ) 0 r1 P Z
N
4 1
( 4 i a ) 1 0 L )
a) 1 i 0 0
N 4. 1
a) n z 7 ) ) c d 4T H 4 :1
C t
s a )
* . . E C U b ü "2 c t i c d 1 4 I ,1 1
C l ) (1 ) c o TH ( 4 I io
( t ) W , . 2 ct r I
( 1 )
CD " t i ct i , 1
> C t
0
r -) C U
I 0 ' V c l I W n z i •T 1 • , I 4 i • * 1 41 I 4 I
C O 1.
.I c . i
C . ) , 4
VD
N I
I
I
I
OM ,1 c
I
c q
o
I
I
I
I
I
I
c N i
z
I
, ,
, ,
I
I
I
01
I
I
I
I
I
I
4 0-1
r '--
I
I
I
I
I
( /-1 I I
.I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0 %
.0
I
, i -
) c
• , i c) C l ) • • I
0
I
I c . ) c. . ) r I •, 1
c o > co u ) c o r 1 Ia) > 4 ) ri 0 . 4 I 4) C l ) c )
I
c e )
N 4 ) 4
I
I
c o
c)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
c N 4 , ,
Z CY 4 . 4 4 1
c \ I c • I
-4 / 4 1 . 0 CO
I
I
N 4 ) 1 4
c o c e " C $ . . 4 J
h .
w P I < E 1
9 1 4 1 r i 4
D UCTS
. , t .
c e l N.
I
I
I
-. Iel
I
L n
c• I N . L n
I
N. 4 / C1
I
I
N .
41 / 1 0
I
, ,
I
I
I
.1 -
4 )
0 K r L4
0 A
r = 3
r = 4 = 1
0 C• I
0 4
I
C I
, i
I
I
N . 4-
4, ,
4 4
4 1
L (
I
, I
I
C T \ c N I
` e
I
I
I
I
c N 1
C
I
I
L n
c p
I
c N I
4
I
1 4 . ) ( I ) ( I ) ' V 4 . 1 • , 1 4 4 • , -I
L
K NAPPI
0 o . . . . , '
/ 4 1 . 0 -t s c n
0 0 -. 4-
H I I 1 1
I 4 I H 9 1 C / )
, . )
( 1 ) 0 O 4 1 U )
I
I
I
I
I
c . i
I
I
I
I
I
I
4
I
I
I
. I-
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
( -9
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
r e . ) , i c. ,
c d c C I 4 4 . i i1 0 0 -
> > c o 1
,i t i
c d c )
C l ) • , 1 N 4 )
1 4 c o
I
I
I
I
0 0'
L r 1
co N . ,i -
i
4 . ) 4 1 4 I P . 4
( N
4 / 1 . 0
I 0 c n ( N
c 0 4 C O
s c n c T
L t rn c V
( 1 ) 4 1 ( 4 ) 0 . . H . 0 C . )
Z
X a ) 4 W 0 0
4J • M I 0
o « N N .
$ 4 ( 1 ) 4 4 t c o " C C r )
C
.I
-4
CO i x ) ( « N
I
4 ) a ) E i C . 0 c i $ 4 1 4 4
c t ) > , _2 c ) o , " ( p c 1
r " -4 . .t
i 4 W 4 ) 4 . J c 3
4 I
4 c l ) 0 E
/ 4 1 0 L r l
( 1 ) 4 0 0
(1 ) ; I 0 0
I
N J 0 . 1 " 0 ct i 41 0 . c l ) , 2 C O ' r i 1 . 1 4
c l 1 4 C l ) W -2
c o
41 / 4 1 4 1 4 0 C ] ) E a0 0 /4 L 4 4
O c t ) . 3 ) _ 2 M I rI rz ,
c 0 c l . ) ' V c 1 1 =1
. 0 C U >
C c
C
rn , a ) t2 4
I n V lasac
I II
t he
p ercentage
o f
f lat
s hatter w ith c ortex d rops
b y
m ore t han h alf, t o . 24 . T he o ther m ajor c hange i s t hat l ess t han o ne t hird o f t he f lakes ( 30%) have c ortex , ad rop o f 1 8%, a nd n ow t he s ame p ercentage o f b lades h ave c ortex, 3 0%. F lake-blade f ragments h ave a s ignificant c orrelation w ith c ortex f or t he o nly t ime i n t his a nalysis, b ased o n l arger s amples t han f or p revious l evels : R = . 34 . L ooking a t t he s ignificant a nd i nsignificant r esults t ogether , i t b ecomes o bvious t hat t he p ercentage o f f lake-blade f ragments with c ortex f ollow t he p ercentages o f b lades w ith c ortex q uite c losely . T his i s p robably t he e asiest e xplanation o f t his v ariation -that m ost o f t hese f lake-blade f ragments a re i n f act p ieces o f b lades. D uring V lasac I II t imes, p eople may h ave b egun making s eparate f lake a nd b lade c ores, a nd s topped u sing u sed f lake c ores a s b lade c ores. I f t his w ere t he c ase, t hen t he c ores s hould r eflect t his, a s l arge c ores h aving b lade a s f lake s cars, a nd t he a verage s ize o f b lades s hould b e a s b ig a s t hat o f f lakes. T he o nly c ategory o f c hipped s tone i n S tarC 'evo f or which t here were e nough c ases t o c alculate s tatistics was t he f lakes. S eventy s even p ercent o f t he f lakes h ave c ortex i n t he S tarCevo m aterial , w hich s eems v ery h igh c ompared t o t he I t hrough I II m aterial , b ut o f c ourse t he t otal s ample s ize o f V lasac I V i s v ery s mall. T he d ata were r eorganized ( aggregated) s o t hat e ach p rovenience u nit h ad o ne r ecord . P earson's c orrelations were t hen d one, t wice, f irst d eleting a nd t hen i ncluding c ases w ith o ne o r b oth o f t he v alues e qual t o z ero. A n a lmost p erfect c orrelation was f ound b etween t he o ccurrence o f c ortex a nd t he n umber o f p ieces o f f lint f ound i n a s quare: p ieces
r = 0 .9581; s = . 001. T his s imply r eflects t he f act t hat r etaining c ortex were l imited pretty much t o p ri mary
m anufacturing
d ebris ,
w hich
o ccurs
p ieces.
21 2
o nly
i n q uantity,
n ot
a s
i solated
S ummary A nd I ntegration o f T he 3 D ata S ets: T he C hipped S tone I ndustry a t V lasac When t he t hree d ata s ets a re c ombined, t he t otals f or e ach o ccupation , a nd t he r elative i mportance o f v arious r aw m aterials a re r evealed. Table 7 5 c onfirms t he p revious o bservations t hat f lint d ecreases t hrough t ime r elative t o q uartz, a lthough t he p roportions d o n ot c hange q uite a s d ramatically a s was p reviously r eported . T his i s b ecause t he s orting o f t he " tools" i nto t he Primary d ata s et l argely i gnored n on-flint m aterials, t hus s kewing t he p roportions o f m aterials i n a ll d ata s ets. T he d ecrease t hrough t ime i n u tilization o f materials which a re n either q uartz n or f lint i s a lso c onfirmed h ere. I t was p reviously s uggested t hat t his p attern m ay r eflect a p eriod o f e xperimentation w ith l ocally a vailable r esources, g radually d ecreasing a s t he t echnology a dapted i tself m ore c ompletely t o t he e xploitation o f q uartz a nd f lint.
I I,
E xamination o f n on-quartz c ores a nd c ore f ragments f rom V lasac I , a nd I II, s hows a g radual i ncrease i n t he n umber o f f lakes , b lades,
f lake-blade f ragments a nd c ore r ejuvenation f lakes p er c ore t hrough t ime. C ounting two c ore f ragments e qual t o o ne c ore, we f ind t hat V lasac I h as 1 8 f lakes p er c ore, V lasac I I h as 2 4 f lakes p er c ore, a nd V lasac I II h as 2 8 f lakes p er c ore . ( Two c ore f ragments e qualling o ne c ore i s a rbitrary , b ut t he t rend t o h igher r atio o f f lakes t o c ores i s u naffected b y t his a ssumption) . T here were a lso t wo q uartz c ores i n V lasac I and o ne i n V lasac I I i ndicating t hat q uartz was a t l east s ometimes k napped , a nd n ot j ust s mashed u p s hapely p ieces b eing r etrieved f or u se.
r andomly w ith f ortuitously
I n V lasac I , e xamination o f c ores s uggests t hat t hey i nitially e xploited f or f lakes, a nd a fter b eing s omewhat r educed ,
were w ere
c onverted t o b lade c ores. T his i s s uggested b y t he o ccurrence o f n egative b lade s cars o n s maller c ores without c ortex . I n V lasac I I a nd I II t his p attern i s n ot e vident. B lade s cars a re a s l ikely a s f lake s cars t o b e f ound o n l arge c ores with c ortex . Overall, a bout o net hird o f a ll
c hipped p ieces h ave
c ortex .
I n t he S ummary d ata s et,
h owever, i t was f ound t hat f or V lasac I f ewer b lades ( c. 2 5%) t han f lakes ( c. 3 3%) h ad c ortex , a nd t hat i n V lasac I I t his d ifference b ecame m ore e xtreme w ith a lmost h alf ( 48%) o f t he f lakes a nd o nly 1 5% o f t he b lades h aving c ortex. I n V lasac I II a bout o ne-third o f b oth f lakes a nd b lades h ave c ortex . I t s eems c lear t hen t hat i n V lasac I b lades were p roduced o n c ores r educed, a nd f requently c leared o f c ortex , b y p rior f laking . I n V lasac I I t imes g reater c are w as t aken t o p roduce b lades w ithout c ortex with a n ew s trategy which i nvolved s triking f lakes a nd b lades o ff t he s ame c ore, b ut i n s uch a way t hat t he f lakes c arried o ff a ll t he c ortex . I n V lasac I II t imes f lakes a nd b lades were p roduced o n s eparate c ores, a s i s r eflected b y t he b alancing o ut o f t he p ercentage o f e ach w hich b ears c ortex. T here i s a d ecrease t hrough t ime i n t he p ercentage o f p ieces w ith c ortex , p articularly i f o nly f lint i s c onsidered a s f ollows: V lasac I , 3 8.4% ;
V lasac I I,
3 7.8%;
a nd V lasac I II,
3 0.6% .
T his
c orresponds
t o
t he i ncreasing r atio t hrough t ime o f f lakes f rom 1 8 t o 2 4 t o 2 8 p er c ore . T he h igh p ercentage o f p ieces w ith c ortex , t aken t ogether w ith t he h igh a nd i ncreasing r atios o f f lakes
22 2
t o c ores,
c learly i ndicates
i n
x
C ) in C,1
4-
• 0
CO
•
c '• 1
-
I
I
I
I
0 0
— 4
I
03
V)
I
V . " )
. . 1 .-
•
•
CO
, — .4
-4 '
L rl
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N -
I
I
• ,1 -
I
, I
r-) — 1 L i ' )
c \ I
I
C . ) C 3 C l )
C j
c ;I
r 4
r • .
X I
4C r )
cn N. Le 1
, 1
0
, — I 4-
C ) c d
c\ I
0 . 1 Cr )
•
I
C I
I
1 : >
L r )
. 1 • 0
( " 4 • 0
I
r — i — 1
1 r )
Cr )
c , 1 • 0
C T % • 0
0
c r N
0
cN
, I -
I
I H 4 I ,1 I . -
v 0 •
0
I 0 i n 1 C I I C > 1 0 0
c O
V : . ) • ' • 2 I
C 7N
. 1 .-
Cr )
01 C . 7 1 , 1
i -
o
r --
o
c\ I
c o
, . ,
1
.t .
in
1-• . I A . t .
N.,
r0 1
1
r -I
Cr ) 0 0 , i
, : . 1
. " . )
, • 4
0 0 .
1 . /-1 C r )
c z n
C V I
I
I
0
•
Cr )
Cr )
, 1
c 4
a \
I C\ I
. 1 1 I
Unidentified
O' N C r )
L imestone
, . 0
S iltstone
• , 0
F lint/Chert
C OUNTS O F
0
H • . 4VD
I
0 1-
s itu knapping, with n o p reliminary t rimming a t a ll o utside t he s ite. T he e xtremely h igh c orrelation b etween t otal n umber o f p ieces p er s quare a nd n umber o f p ieces w ith c ortex ( r = . 9581, s = xel) f ound f or t he S ummary d ata i s a f urther r eflection o f i n s itu manufacturing, i ncluding p rimary t rimming o f c ores. P ieces w ith c ortex a re f ound w ith p rimary manufacturing d ebris, which a re f ound i n q uantity, n ot a s i solated p ieces. A s
r evealed
i n
t he
Primary
d ata
s et
a nalysis,
i n
a ll
t hree
o ccupations t he s ame t ool s hapes were f ound i n small n umbers : n otches, r eamers, g ravers, d rills, p iercers, p ieces e squillees, p oints, d enticulates, c ircular s crapers, a nd m icroliths, which w ere p robably u sed i n c omposite t ools. S ome o f t hese t ools w ere s haped f rom b lanks b y r etouching, b ut t he majority employed t he f ortuitous s hapes o f unretouched f lakes a nd b lades. T he p rimary u se o f r etouching i n a ll t hree o ccupations was t o p repare a nd u se. The
p ercentage
o f
r epair e dges ,
m ostly
f or s craping
p ieces which were r etouched i ncreases t hrough
t ime i n t he P rimary d ata s et f rom 1 7% i n V lasac I , I I, a nd 2 2.2% i n Vlasac I II. Examination o f t he
t o 1 8.7% i n Vlasac r ecovery r ates o f
r etouched/used p ieces f rom S quare 5 23 s uggest, h owever , t hat a s l ittle a s 3 5% o f t he t otal r etouched p ieces were r ecovered. Whatever t he r ecovery r ate was, i f w e c an a ssume t hat i t was t he s ame f or a ll t hree o ccupations, t hen i t c an b e s een t hat t he p ercentage o f r etouched p ieces r elative t o t he t otal n umber o f p ieces o f c hipped s tone d oes n ot v ary t hrough t ime . A r ecovery r ate o f 3 5.67% would i ndicate t hat a bout 1 5% o f a ll c hipped m aterial w as r etouched i n a ll t hree o ccupations. B lades w ere m ore f requently r etouched , m ore i ntensively u sed ( more e dges u sed, a nd more l ikely t o h ave b een u sed f or a d iversity o f t asks), a nd more l ikely t o h ave b een u sed a t a ll t han f lakes i n b oth V lasac I a nd I I. I n V lasac I II, t he p reference f or b lades v anishes. An e qual p ercentage ( 20%) o f b oth f lakes a nd b lades were u nused, a nd more f lakes ( 26.7%) t han b lades ( 20.3%) were r etouched.
S ome s hatter
was a lso u sed a nd r etouched i n V lasac I II, w hereas i t h ad n ot b een u sed i n p revious p eriods . T hese c hanges c orrespond t o t he c hanges d iscussed a bove i n t he p ercentages o f f lakes a nd b lades having c ortex , a nd i n t he c hanging ways b lades a nd f lakes were manufactured i n o rder t o d istribute t he c ortex i n a c ertain w ay . I n t he f irst t wo o ccupations, b lades were p referred a nd v alued o ver f lakes i n a way which d isappeared d uring t he t hird o ccupation . E vidence f or i ncreasing c arelessness i n k napping t echniques t hrough t ime c orresponds t o t he willingness t o u se s hatter a nd t o t he l oss o f i nterest i n b lades. C arelessness i s s uggested b y i ncreased p ercentages
o f
t wisted a nd
c urved
f lakes,
f ewer
r ecognizable p latforms a nd b ulbs o f p ercussion. T he p ercentage o f u nretouched a rtifacts which e videnced u se—damage u nder t he m icroscope a lso i ncreased t hrough t ime: V lasac I , 5 3.9% ; V lasac I I, 5 8.9%; a nd V lasac I II, All
o f
5 8.4%. t hese
c hanges
t aken
t ogether
s uggest
t hat
t hrough t ime
f lint a rtifacts were b eing u sed more i ntensively, a nd t hat t o a id i n i ncreasing t he e fficiency o f u tilization , s ome l owering o f s tandards o f q uality o ccurred.
2 24
The r ecording o f c olor f or a rtifacts i n S quare 5 23 d id p roduce p atterned c hanges t hrough t ime . T his i s a s tudy which c ould e asily b e e xtended t o t he materials o f t he whole c omplex o f s ites i n t he I ron G ates R egion . C ombined with d etailed d ata o n f lint d eposits within t he Gorge i t c ould p otentially y ield i nformation o n l ocal p rocurement, e xchange a nd i nteraction p atterns. The c reation o f a n ew a rtifact c ategory, " flake/blade" , f or t he P rimary d ata a nalysis , p roved worthwhile . F lake/blades h ave s ome , b ut n ot a ll o f t he c haracteristics n ormally u sed b y a rcheologists t o d efine b lades. A v ery h igh p ercentage were n ot u sed a t a ll, i ndicating t hat t hey were " failed" b lades b ecause, f or e xample, o f f laws i n t he r aw m aterial which p roduced o dd , a nd u seless, s hapes . Among t hose which were u sed , t he o verall p attern o f u tilization w as d istinct f rom t hat o f b oth b lades a nd f lakes, a nd s hared s ome c haracteristics o f b oth . F urther a nalysis o f u se p atterns o n f lakes a nd b lades, i nvolving t he i ndividual v ariables which c ombined t o c haracterize b lades, o ught t o l ead t o n ew i nsights i nto t he r elations o f f orm a nd f unction i n s tone t ools. A s t his d istinction was u sed h ere, i t c ertainly s erved t o r eveal d istinctions b etween f lake a nd b lade u tilization which would h ave b een c hanged , weakened , o r o bliterated b y t he l umping o f f lake/blades w ith f lakes -w hich i s w here t hey " technically" b elong. S tudy o f t he c orrelations b etween v arious metric d imensions o f a rtifacts i n t he P rimary d ata s et s uggest t hat t he k ey d imension i n f lake p roduction i s p latform width . A model o f t he d eterminants o f f lake
s ize and p roportion
i n f lint knapping h as b een d eveloped a nd
p resented a s F igure 1 7. T he m ajor r eason f or t he a nalysis o f a rtifacts f rom S quare 5 23 was t o c onfirm t he r esults o f t he a nalysis o f t he P rimary d ata s et. T he r espects i n which S quare 5 23 d id c onfirm t hose r esults h ave a lready b een d iscussed . T here a re s everal p oints o f d isagreement b etween t he two s ets o f d ata. T he a rtifacts o f S quare 5 23 were l ess l ikely t o h ave b een h eat t reated o r h ave a s triking p latform, and t hey h ad a l ower mean n umber o f p latform f acets, a nd a l ower mean n umber o f p revious r emoval s cars . T he d ifferences i n h eat t reatment , p latform , and r emoval s cars c an p robably b e e xplained b y t heir e ye-catching q uality. Artifacts which were g lossy, h ad p latforms, a nd l ots o f r emoval s cars " looked l ike s omething" a nd t herefore e njoyed a h igher p robability o f b eing s elected b y t hose who s orted o ut t he P rimary d ata s et. I t s eems u nlikely t hat p latform f acets c an b e e xplained t his way--they a re t oo s mall t o i s c lear f rom t his i s t hat
b e c redited w ith e ye-catching p ower . What t he p ercentage d istributions o f a ll f our o f
t hese v ariables a re " off" i n t he P rimary d ata s et, t hat i s, h igher t han w ould b e e xpected f or t he s ite a s a w hole.
t hey a re
T he s econd a rea o f n on-correspondence b etween t he P rimary d ata s et a nd S quare 5 23 i s i n t he m ean v alues f or s everal c ontinuous v ariables, a nd i n t he p attern o f c hange o f t hese v ariables v alues
o f
p latform
l ength
a nd
width,
a nd
t hrough t ime .
f lake
l ength,
T he m ean
width,
a nd
t hickness a re c onsistently l ower f or S quare 5 23 a rtifacts t han f or t he P rimary d ata s et a rtifacts. A dditionally, m ean v alues d ecrease t hrough t ime f rom V lasac I t o I I t o I II t he
m eans
d ecrease
i n t he P rimary d ata s et .
f rom V lasac I t o V lasac I I,
2 25
b ut
I n S quare 5 23
t hen i ncrease a gain
i n V lasac I II,
t hough n ot
b ack
t o t he o riginal v alues
s eparate b iasing f actors a re i n o peration h ere. were t he
b iased m eans
t owards
o f
artifacts,
l arger
s orted V lasac
a rtifacts . I II
T he
a rtifacts
whereas i n S quare 5 23,
t o
t he
b ias,
w hich
s econd b e
o f V lasac I .
F irst,
b elow
Two
s orters c aused
s orted V lasac
I I
V lasac I II means were h igher t han
V lasac I I, i s more d ifficult t o e xplain . T he p ercentages o f r etouched/ heavily u sed a rtifacts f or V lasac I ( 16.6%), V lasac I I ( 20.7%), a nd V lasac I II ( 11.2%), r etouched a rtifacts
f ound i n S quare 5 23 may p rovide t he a nswer. w ere s maller t han u nretouched a rtifacts, t hen
smaller p ercentage o f
r etouched
and
would
I f or S quare
V lasac I II .
5 23
a rtifacts
i nflate
I n t he P rimary d ata s et,
i n V lasac
t he
m ean
s ize
I II
r elative
I f t he
t o I I
measurements f or
t he p ercentage o f a rtifacts which
are r etouched i s more n early t he s ame f or e ach o f t he t hree l evels. T he p ercentage o f a ll a rtifacts which a re r etouched a ppears t o b e a bout t he s ame f or a ll t hree o ccupations. S quare 5 23 i s anomalous.
The l ow v alue f or V lasac I II i n
This s uggests t hat t he o riginal f inding o f
o verall d ecrease i n a rtifact
s ize
t hrough t ime i s
a v alid o ne.
V ery l ittle material was r ecovered f rom Vlasac I V, t he S tar evo o ccupation . I I and I II s uggested
A nalysis o f t his material, a nd c omparison with V lasac I , materials i n t erms o f t echnology o f manufacture h as
a n h ypothesis
o f
c ontinuity
t he e arly a gricultural p eriod. explored more a dequately o n t he s ites
o f c ulture a nd p opulation i nto
This h ypothesis c an c ertainly b e c hipped s tone a ssemblages o f o ther
i n t he G orge w ith m ore s ubstantial N eolithic d eposits. A
t otal
k napping , a bove,
o f
were
1 62
f lint
c hips,
r ecovered a t V lasac .
t hat v irtually a ll o f
v ery
s mall
I n v iew
t he 1 0,001
p ieces
o f o f
b yproducts t he
e vidence
o f
f lint
p resented
f lint w ere k napped i n
s itu, 1 62 c hips i ndicates a n a lmost t otal f ailure t o r ecover s uch s mall a rtifacts. P ayne ( 1972, p p .53-54) h as r eported t he r esults o f t renchr ecovery ( no s creening) c ompared with water s ieving a t t hree s ites. Trench r ecovery v aries wildly f rom 0 % t o 8 2% o f t he a ctual c hipped s tone present. R ecovery o f smaller a rtifacts i s c onsistently worse t han f or l arger o nes. P ayne p oints o ut t hat u sing wet-sieving, F rancois l arger
B ordes
t ools,
r ecovered b etween 1 85
whereas
P eyrony ,
u sing
a nd
3 75
o nly
m icroblade
t ools
t rench-recovery
o n
p er t he
1 00 s ame
s ite ( La C are d e C ouze) , r ecovered o nly f our m icroblades p er 1 00 l arger t ools. A t V lasac o nly t rench-recovery w as u sed . O ne c an o nly m arvel t hat
t he
f ew
m icroblades
a nd
g eometrics
r ecovered were
r ecovered ,
wonder whether t hey r epresent h undreds m ore w hich were u ndetected.
26 2
a nd
T HE C HIPPED S TONE I NDUSTRY I N C ONTEXT U tilization o f C hipped S tone a t V lasac A l ong l ist o f u ses
t o which c hipped s tone w as p ut m ay b e d rawn u p
f or V lasac , m ostly b y way o f i nference o n t he b asis o f a rtifactual a nd o ther m aterials r ecovered f rom t he s ite , a nd d iscussed a bove . C hipped s tones u ndoubtedly s erved b oth a s p rimary t ools a nd a s s econdary t ools, t ools t o make t ools. T hey may h ave b een u sed t o b utcher a nd t o s cale f ish . F ish m ay w ell h ave b een p reserved , p erhaps b y s moking o ver t he r ectangular h earths f ound i n m any h ouses . S torage i s s uggested j ust o n t he b asis o f t he v olume o f b one f ound , a s d iscussed a bove . I t i s a lso n ecessary t o s cale f ish, p erhaps with s tone t ools. T he l ack o f e xperimental d ata o n s caling f ish w ith s tone t ools s hould b e r emedied . I t would c ertainly b e i nteresting t o t est q uartz i n t his r espect, a s t he n ot p articularly s harp , b ut e xtremely t ough , e dges o f q uartz m ight b e b etter s uited t o t his t ask t han w ould f lint. K amminga a nd V an N oten ( 1979, p .299) h ave b oth r eported , h owever , t hat q uartz d oes n ot s eem t o d evelop s triations w ith u se , a nd t hat o ne c annot s ee m uch b eyond b eing a ble t o i dentify s ome e dges a s " worn" . T he p rominence o f q uartz i n t he c hipped s tone i ndustry would a lso f it w ith t he i mportance o f f ishing i n t he s ubsistence s ystem , m aking t he r elationship b etween q uartz a nd f ish p rocessing s eem a l ikely h ypothesis. [ Adovasio, h owever, ( p.c.) h as p ointed o ut t hat e thnographic f ish s calers d urable m aterials].
w ere
r arely
i f
e ver m ade
o f
T he b utchering o f t he many g ame a nimals f or which t here i s e vidence a t V lasac would a lso h ave r equired t he u se o f c hipped s tone t ools. A r elated u se would h ave b een a s p rojectile t ips i n h unting, a nd p ossibly i n f ishing a s well . P rojectile p oints were a lso m ade w ith b one ( see a bove), b ut a f ew u nambiguous s tone e xamples were a lso r ecovered ( see a bove) . A l ikely , a lthough u ntestable , e xplanation f or t he d earth o f p rojectile h eads a t V lasac i s t hat t he majority were c omposite t ools m ade with m icroliths . T here i s g ood r eason t o b elieve , a s h as b een d iscussed , t hat r ecovery o f m icroliths a t V lasac w as c lose t o z ero. T he r ecovery a nd p reparation o f p lant f oods m ay n ot h ave d irectly i nvolved a ny s tone t ools a t a 'l ( Hayden, 1 978, p .184). E thnographic d escriptions o f g atherers i ro olve t he u se o f wooden implements i n g athering , a lthough i t would s eem o n l og L cal g rounds t hat k nives would b e - desirable i n c ollecting many p lant p roducts. S tone t ools would c ertainly b e i nvolved s econdarily i n t he s haping o f wooden t ools which were d irectly u sed. The f lcral e vidence i ndicates a p ossible s hift t owards g rasses, c ereals, g raminae , a nd c henopodia i n V lasac I II, b ut t here a re n o s ickle g lossed b lades t o b ack u p t his s uggestion . Once a gain i t i s c lear t hat b ladelets u sed i n t he c onstruction o f c omposite s ickles would n ot h ave b een r ecovered w ith t he e xcavation t echniques u sed. A nother
s econdary
u se
o f
c hipped
s tone
w hich w e
c an o nly
s uppose
o ccurred was i n t he p reparation o f h ides a nd p ossibly s inew a nd o ther animal p roducts f or c lothing and o ther u ses. Other k inds o f manufacturing which p robably went o n , a nd i nvolved t he u se o f s tone t ools, were t he m aking o f wooden t ools s uch .a s b ows, a rrow s hafts,
2 27
wooden b owls,
a rticles o f f urniture,
b oats,
p addles,
f ish w eirs,
a nd/or
o ther t ypes o f f ishing e quipment . S ofter p lant p roducts m ay h ave b een u sed t o make f ish n ets, b askets, e tc. House c onstruction a lso u nquestionably i nvolved t he u se o f wood , which h ad t o b e c ut , t rimmed a nd s haped. The n umerically most a bundant a rtifact c ategory a fter c hipped s tone a t V lasac was worked b one . T ools m ade o f b one , a ntler a nd t usk , n umbering c lose t o 4 ,000, w ere p resumably m ade u sing s tone t ools . I n a ddition , 1 44 b one a nd s tone o bjects were d ecorated-engraved , a nd t he e ngraving t ools m ust h ave b een s tone. C hange T hrough T ime A nalysis
o f
t he
c hipped
s tone
i ndustry
f rom
t he
f our o ccupational
l evels a t V lasac h as p rovided a p icture o f g radual , r ather t han a brupt, c hange t hrough t ime. T he e xistence o f a l arge n umber o f s ites f rom r oughly t he s ame t ime p eriod i n t his r egion , a nd t he f act t hat a ll s ites s hare a g reat n umber o f s imilarities w ith e ach o ther , h as l ed t o t he g eneral a cceptance o f t he i dea o f p opulation a nd c ultural c ontinuity t hroughout t he p ost-Pleistocene-pre-Neolithic p eriod . T hese s ites a nd s imilarities were d iscussed i n s ome d etail a bove w ith r espect t o c hronology a nd d ating. A more
i nteresting
q uestion
i s
t he
c hange
r epresented
b y
t he
ri9 s ites i n t his a rea . a ppearance o f e arly N eolithic , S tarC 'evo-Körös - C vo o ccupation, V lasac I V, i s t oo p oorly r epresented i n t he The S tarCie c hipped s tone c ollection t o m ake c onclusive s tatements a bout whether t his s tone working t echnology r epresents a c ontinuation o f t he V lasac s tyle d irected t o meeting t he d emands o f n ew s ubsistence t asks o r a b reak--an i ntroduction o f a n u nrelated t echnological t radition o r s tyle f rom o utside . S tudy a nd c omparison o f V lasac I V m aterial w ith t hat o f V lasac I , I I, a nd I II h as s uggested a n h ypothesis o f c ontinuity. Analyses o f s keletal materials f rom t he I ron Gates R egion ( y'Edynak, 1 978a ; y 'Edynak a nd F leisch , 1 983 ; Z ivanovi , 1 975) h ave a lso s upported t he i dea t hat n o i mmigration o f t axonomically d istinct p eople o ccurred w ith t he i ntroduction o f N eolithic e conomy.
t he
Marshak ( 1981, b asis o f h is
M esolithic ,
p .36-37) h as a lso s uggested c ultural p s tudies o f t he a rt o f t he u pper
c ontinuity o n P aleolithic,
a nd e arly N eolithic i n E urope :
t here i s f or
i n t he a rcheological r ecord c lear e vidence
a widespread
u pper
Paleolithic
c ultural
s ymbolic d evelopment c omprising e ast, west, a nd Mediterranean Europe. T here i s e vidence f or t he p ersistence o f t hat c ultural , s ymbolic d evelopment i n
t he
d ispersed
s uggestion
t hat
s tructural,
E pipaleolithic
c ultures
a nd
a
i t p layed a r ole a s a c ognitive,
i ntegrative
e lement
i n
t he
e arly
N eolithic c ultures. T he
s mall amount
e arliest N eolithic
o f
i nformation a vailable o n t he f auna o f
o ccupations
i n
t he G orge a lso
d eparture f rom t hose o f t he Mesolithic s ites.
28 2
r epresents n o
t he
r adical
T he d omesticated d og
e xisted
i n
t his
a rea
b y V lasac I t imes,
a nd
may h ave b een p resent
s lightly e arlier a t I coana I . I t i s i nteresting t o n ote t hat C anis l upus i s 7 .3% o f t he MNI a t C uina Turcului I which i s v ery e arly ( c. 1 0,000 B .C.
uncalibrated),
a nd
1 2% o f
t he MNI
a t
C uina Turcului
I I
( about 8 000 B .C., uncalibrated) . T his may r epresent a n i nitial i ntensification o f i nterest i n wolves, which u ltimately l ed t o d omestication . A t Lepenski Vir, t he s econd l evel o f which i s l ater t han V lasac, a d ifferent v ariety o f d og t han t hat s een a t Vlasac h as b een i dentified . I t i s t his l ater v ariety which i s a lso f ound o n N eolithic s ites. The e arliest s ite f or which f aunal d ata a re a vailable i s C uina T urcului . T he m ost important m ammals i n l evel I were wild p ig , b eaver , a nd i bex . I n l evel I I i bex b ecame m ost i mportant, f ollowed b y a urochs, c hamois, a nd wolf.
B eaver t railed i n f ifth p lace.
A t t he l ater s ite
o f I coana, t he m ost important mammals were p igs, r ed d eer, a nd r oe d eer . B oth d og a nd p igs s howed s ome i ndications o f d omestication a t I coana a nd P adina A . I t i s a g reat l oss t hat t he f aunal m aterial f rom a ll l evels a t V lasac were a nalyzed a s a s ingle u nit , o bliterating a ny c hanges t hrough t ime . R ed d eer , d og , a nd p ig w ere t he m ost i mportant m ammals i n t his c ollection . A t L epenski V ir , i n b oth Mesolithic l evels a nd i n t he N eolithic l evel, r ed d eer was t he m ost important mammal, f ollowed b y d og a nd a urochs o n l evels I a nd I I, a nd b y c ow, wild p ig, a nd a urochs i n l evel I II, t he Neolithic l evel. C arnivores a re among t he most important mammals i n a ll t hree N eolithic l evels a t C uina T urcului, a s a re d og , r ed d eer, a nd p igs a nd b ovids ( wild a nd d omestic n ot d ifferentiated) . R ed d eer a s a n important a nimal r uns t hrough t his e ntire
s equence,
a s
d o
d ogs,
p igs,
a nd c ows
( wild
o r
t ame) .
T he
t hree
e arly important d omesticates, d og, p ig, a nd c ow, c an a ll b e s een t o h ave b een i mportant e xploited m ammals p rior t o d omestication i n t his a rea . A nd i n l evel I II a t L epenski V ir--the o nly N eolithic s ite i n t he G orge f or which u nambiguous b one c ounts h ave b een p ublished--only 2 0% o f t he b ones a re o f d omesticated a nimals ( discounting d og, a s t his r epresented n o c hange f rom t he p revious p eriod) . A rguments f or i n s itu d omestication h ave b een r eferred t o a bove . Whether t hese a rguments c an b e s upported o r n ot, t he c hanges i ndicated b y t he m ammalian f auna c an h ardly b e d escribed a s r evolutionary. T hroughout t he l iterature o n t hese s ites o ne f inds r eferences t o m asses o f f ish b ones c overing h ouse f loors, o r t o c alcified b locks o f f ish b ones f ound n ear h earths. The p roblems with a ssessing t he a bsolute a nd r elative importance o f f ish h ave b een d iscussed a bove , a nd will
j ust
b e
l isted h ere:
much f ish b one,
p articularly o f smaller
f ish , r arely p reserves a rcheologically u nder a ny c onditions; f ish b one i s r ecovered i n s ubstantial n umbers a nd r eliably o nly w hen s ieving i s u sed i n e xcavation ; s ince t he b alance o f s pecies i n t he D anube t oday i s m uch a ltered f rom 8 000 y ears a go--as w e c an s ee i n t he s ize r ange f or s ome s pecies--it i s n ot p ossible t o r eliably r econstruct e ven t he o tt _ntial r esource 1 , a se which was a vi'lablc. V lasac, P adiva a nd L epenski V ir a re t he o nly s ites f or which f ish b one h as b een c ounted a nd i ncluded with mammals, b irds, e tc., i n t he c alculation o f p ercentage r epresentation o f d ifferent s pecies . A t L epenski V ir f ish d oes d ecrease i n i mportance h rough t ime , f rom 5 7% i n l evel I , t o 2 5% i n l evel I I, a nd 1 7% i n l evel I II. O nce a gain , t he c hange t hrough t ime i s s teep, b ut t he N eolithic s hows n o d iscontinuity f rom e arlier p hases.
2 29
Analysis mystery
o f
o f f ossil t he
p ollens
p recise
p rovides a f inal
r elationship
i ntriguing c lue t o t he
b etween
t he
Mesolithic
a nd
s ubsequent e arly Neolithic i nhabitants o f t he I ron Gates R egion.
A s
d iscussed a bove, C arciumaru ( 1978) h as r eported t he p resence o f c ereal p ollen f rom V lasac I I a nd I II which i s o utside t he s ize r ange f or w ild c ereals . p icture
H igh p ercentages s uggesting
i ncipient p lant The
o f
h uman
c henopodia
w ere
manipulation
o f
f ound,
p lant
l eading
t o
a
c ommunity —or
d omestication.
a ccumulated
e vidence
s ummarized
d ichotomy b etween Mesolithic a nd N eolithic i s o f
a lso t he
t he Neolithic
a re
n ot
know,
b ut
i t
i s
h ere
s uggests
a f alse
c lear
o ne.
t hat
t hat T he
t he
c auses
t hey were
f elt
world w ide , a s t he n umber o f u narguably p ristine d evelopments p roves. The p eople o f t he I ron Cates h ad l ong s ince d omesticated t heir f irst animal,
t he d og, s o t he i dea o f d omestication was n ot n ew.
well h ave a lso
b een c ontrolling o r
i nfluencing t he
They may
r eproduction o f
c ereals c ontact
a nd p igs when t he f irst f armers f rom t he s outh c ame i nto with t hem ( Boronearq, 1 981). T he l ack o f e vidence o f major
impact
o f
p opulation ,
s uch i f
d evelopments
t hey
i n
f act
o n
t he
o ccurred,
c ulture
m ay h ave
o f
t he
a p recedent
I ron
Gates
i n s outhern
Egypt, where d omesticated b arley may h ave b een a n i mportant e conomic r esource , without h aving t riggered a ny p articular c ultural c hanges, a s e arly a s b een
1 8000 B .P.
e stablished
c ows, known
( Wendorf
b ased
o n
s heep, g oats, and p igs, a bout
p opulation,
t his
p eriod,
o r i ndeed,
e t a l,
f ish
i n
1 979) .
e xchange
a nd wheat.
t here
i s
n o
might
c eramics,
e asily
h ave
d omesticated
O n t he b asis o f what i s n ow
s upport
c ultural r eplacement.
2 30
Trade f or
f or
a n
h ypothesis
o f
C ONCLUSIONS T erminology A nd P erspective A u seful way t o e xamine p ast a nd p resent u nderstanding o f t he p eriod u nder d iscussion i s t o c onsider t he t erminology which i s, a nd h as b een , u sed . I nitial i nterest a nd r esearch i n E uropean p rehistory r esulted i n a f irst c rude d ichotomized r econstruction o f t wo p hases: t he P aleolithic, s ignaled b y h uman a ssociation with e xtinct f auna, g athering , f ishing , a nd h unting a s t he e xclusive s ubsistence m eans, a nd t he a bsence o f t he t echnological m arkers o f t he s econd p eriod , p ottery a nd p olished s tone; a nd, t he N eolithic, marked b y a ssociation with e xclusively m odern f auna , f ood p roduction , p ottery , a nd p olished s tone ( Lubbock, 1 865). I n b etween t hese two p eriods was a g ap. Excavation i n t he c ave o f M as d 'Azil p roduced m aterial n eatly s tratified b etween P aleolithic a nd N eolithic l evels ( Piette , 1 889) , a nd b y 1 918 t extbooks i n European p rehistory b egan t o mention t he e xistence o f material i ntermediate b etween P aleo-a nd N eolithic ( Clark ,
1 980 ,
p .3) .
T he
t erm
Mesolithic b egan t o b e u sed i n t he n ineteen t hirties a nd f orties b y s ome p rehistorians, b ut n ot b y o thers, a nd o ther t erms, s uch a s E pipaleolithic, a lso b egan t o b e u sed, a s t he e vidence f or c ultures i ntermediate i n t ime b etween P aleolithic a nd N eolithic a nd d raw more a ttention .
b egan
t o
m ount
" The p roper u se a nd s ignificance o f t erms l ike ' Epipaleolithic' a nd ' Mesolithic' i s s till a matter o f d iscussion amongst European p rehistorians" . ( Bietti, 1 981, p .33) . T he t erm E pipaleolithic c onveys t he i dea o f h istorical c ontinuity b etween t he l ate P aleolithic a nd t he e nsuing p ost-glacial i nhabitants. T his t erm s ays t hat t he e arly p ost P leistocene p eople w ere t he g enetic a nd c ultural d escendants o f U pper P aleolithic E uropeans, a nd t hat t heir n ew a daptations t o t he c hanged c onditions o f p ost-glacial E urope s hould b e u nderstood a s h istorically c ontinuous w ith t he P aleolithic . " Epipaleolithic" d erives f rom t he o ld d ichotomized t wo-stage m odel o f E uropean p rehistory : t he e arly p ost g lacial p eople were s urvivors who e ked o ut a n e xistence i n t he n ew c limatic c onditions--without r eindeer and without art. The i nappropriate i mplication o f t he t erm E pipaleolithic , a side f rom i ts h istorical l ink with t he i dea o f t he Mesolithic a s a p eriod o f d evolution , i s t hat i t s uggests n o c ontinuity b etween E pipaleolithic a nd N eolithic . T his t erm f its t he m odel o f n ear e astern f armers moving i nto a E urope e mpty o f a ny s ignificant h uman p opulation . I t b iases u s a gainst c onsidering impartially t he p rocess o f Neolithicization i n E urope a nd t he r ole o f r esident f oragers i n t hat p rocess. B oroneant ( 1981, p .5) s ays, t he t erm E pipaleolithic i s t o i ts
e xpression
o f
h istorical
c ontinuity
b e r ejected b ecause i t e xpresses a f alse a nd f ood p roducing p opulations i n E urope .
w ith
A lthough , a s b e v alued f or
t he P leistocene,
d ichotomy
b etween
i t
m ust
c ollecting
The t erm " Mesolithic" h as b een u sed b y s ome r esearchers i n a p urely c hronological s ense, t o m ean a ll p opulations a nd c ultures which e xisted i n t he H olocene b efore t he s pread o f a N eolithic e conomy b ased o n d omesticated wheat, c attle, s heep/goats, a nd p igs ( cf . P rice, 1 983, p .762).
One
o f
t he
c onfusing
a spects
o f
t his
u sage
i s
t hat
t he
c limatic c hanges o f t he i nitial H olocene w ere f ar m ore s ignificant i n s ome a reas t han i n o thers ( quite mild f or e xample i n S outheastern
2 31
Europe) ( Tringham, 1 973, p .552), a nd t he b eginning o f c limate amelioration o ccurred l ater f urther n orth . Implicit i n t his u se o f t he t erm i s t he i dea t hat t hese c limatic c hanges t riggered r apid m ajor a daptive s hifts, and t hus t he p eriod s hould b e s een a s a d istinctive o ne .
I f c limate c hange was
m ild i n s ome a reas,
l ike D olukhanov 's ( 1977, p .190) , t han m ost, b ecomes p roblematic :
h owever ,
which i s a dmittedly
m ore
a f ormulation d eterministic
The Mesolithic was a r esponse t o d ramatic e nvironmental c hange. R egional v ariations i n i t were a d irect r esult o f r egional r esource v ariation. A t t he o ther e nd o f t he t ime s cale, Mesolithic s ites c an b e f ound c oe xisting a nd o verlapping with N eolithic o nes i n s ome a reas o f E urope f or a t l east 1 000 y ears ( see a bove) . I f w e u se t he t erm Mesolithic i n a p urely
c hronological
splitting s ites s imilarities.
way,
without
we
will
r eference
f ind t o
o urselves artifactual
c ombining o r
o r
e conomic
A b arely s eparable way i n which t he t erm Mesolithic h as b een d efined i s e conomic. H ere, Mesolithic c ultures a re s een a s b eing t ransitional b etween t he Paleolithic h unters, a nd t he N eolithic f ood p roducers , i n t hat t he main s ubsistence a ctivity b ecame c ollecting o f p lants a nd m ollusks i n s ome a reas, a nd f ishing o r h unting o f b irds a nd m icro mammals i n o thers ( Bietti , 1 981, p .33) . T his s ubsistence s hift away f rom l arge m ammals i s a ssumed t o h ave l ed t o g reater s edentism , a c ombination s ettling-in a nd b road s pectrum a daptation which was a n e ssential p relude [ in C lark's words ( 1980)] t o t he s hift t o f ull f ood p roduction . A r igid a pplication o f t he e conomic d efinition o f Mesolithic l eads t o a s m uch c onfusion a s d oes t he t emporal d efinition . I n f act, i n b oth a pplications o f t he t erm , t he a lternative d efinition u sually l urks i mplicitly i n t he s hadows. I f, a s C lark i nsists, t he c rucial c haracteristic o f t he M esolithic i s t hat i t was a " prelude" t o t he N eolithic, t hen we must a dmit a c hronological meaning t o t he u se o f t he t erm, t hough i t n eed n ot b e d efined a s s trictly p ost-glacial. T ringham ( 1973) , h as s uggested t hat Mesolithic c ultures c ontinued t o f lourish i n s ome a reas without f undamental c hanges f or l ong a fter f ood p roducers h ad a rrived f rom t he s outh , b ecause t heir s ubsistence s trategies w ere e qually d ependable a nd p roductive . H er h ypothesis i s b ased o n m ore r ecent m odels o f p lant a nd a nimal d omestication which r edefine d omestication a s a g radual p rocess, i nitially i nvolving h uman b ehavior which i mproves r eproductive c hances f or d esirable p lants o r a nimals without a ny d irect manipulation o f t heir r eproduction . T his m eans t hat t here w ould b e n o m orphological e vidence o f e arly d omestication a lthough i n s ome s ense d omestication , o r c ontrol o f a f ood s ource t o make i t m ore r eliable a nd p roductive, was i n f act o ccurring ( Higgs a nd J arman , 1 972; B ailey, 1 981) . T ringham ( 1973) i s r eferring t o r ed d eer a nd p ig e xploitation i n Mesolithic E urope , a nd s uggesting t hat t hese s pecies, a long w ith s ome p lants, a nd p erhaps f ish i n t he I ron G ates, w ere c ontrolled a nd e ncouraged i n s ome i ntermediate t ype o f r esource m anipulation ,
t hus p utting t he M esolithic
c ulture o f E urope o n a p ar w ith t he i ntrusive f ood p roducers i n t erms o f s ubsistence s ystems. S ome r eports p ublished s ince T ringham's 1 973
2 32
a rticle h ave
l ent
s upport
t o h er h ypothesis.
I n
t he I ron G ates R egion
t he Mesolithic b otanical e vidence ( reviewed a bove) s trongly s uggests manipulation o f t he e nvironment t o p romote t he g rowth o f c ertain p lants, a nd h as e ven p roduced c ereals with morphological c hanges s uggesting d omestication . O ther e vidence s uggests m anagement o f w ild p igs. Most c onvincing o f a ll i s t he i ndirect p roof o f s edentism p rovided b y t he a rchitectural r emains. S edentism i s a c ritical i ndicator o f r esource d ependability. A s
C lark
( 1980,
p .14) h as
n oted ,
t he e xistence o f d istinct f oci o f
d omestication i n Meso America, S outh America, e tc. " —. c onfirms t hat t his w as a n o utcome o f i ntensified r elationships b etween m en ( sic) a nd p lants r ather t han o f a ny d ramatic d iscovery o r i nvention , s omething f ully
u nderstandable
i n
t he
l ight
p ossessed b y r ecent f oragers And f urther ( ibid, p .24):
a nd
o f
t he
a ccurate
r ecorded
b y
k nowledge
m odern
o f
p lants
a nthropologists ."
T he i nhabitants o f s outhwest I ran, l ike t hose o f K urdistan , P alestine , o r f or t hat m atter , o f Mexico o r P eru, c an b e s een t o h ave modified b oth t heir e nvironment a nd t heir b iological a nd t echnical r esources g radually a nd a lmost i nsensibly, a nd c ertainly m anner. The
b ottom
n ot
l ayer
i n
o f
a ny
t he
s udden
t el
o f
o r
r evolutionary
Abu H ureyra
i n
S yria
h as
b een
d escribed a s Mesolithic. U ncalibrated c arbon d ates p lace i t a round 9 000 B .C. a nd o ther r esults o f e xcavation s uggest t hat t here was a p ermanent s ettlement whose o ccupants s ubsisted o n h unting, f ishing, c ollecting, a nd c ultivating c ereal g rains ( Moore, 1 979). I f we f ind a ll over t he world i ndependent evidence f or a t ransition t o more c ontrolled a nd i ndirect e xploitation s trategies ( Bailey, 1 981, p .7) i n A frica a t 1 8,000 B .C. ( Wendorf e t a l, 1 979), i n A sia ( Thailand), C entral a nd S outh A merica , a nd t he N ear E ast, t hen i t s eems r easonable t o s upppose t hat t he s ame s hifts would h ave b een u nderway i n Europe . C hanging r elationships b etween p eople a nd t he p lants/animals u pon w hich t hey d epended c an b e o bserved worldwide i n r oughly t he s ame t ime p eriod. T he e xplanations we s eek f or t his p rocess must t herefore b e g lobal. A s a c orollary t o t hat, i t s hould n ot b e s urprising t o f ind t he s ame s hift t aking p lace i n M esolithic E urope, p erhaps t o t he p oint o f
" genuine"
d omestication ,
c hanges i n t he d omesticate, I ron G ates G orge . F urther
s tudy
o f
t he
a s o f
t raditionally s ome s pecies,
M esolithic
d efined s uch a s
b y t he
m orphological c ereals
i n t he
i n E urope w ill b e r equired b efore
i t b ecomes c lear j ust where o n t he c ontinuum f rom o pportunistic e xploitation t o p roduction c haracterized b y a g reat d eal o f i nvestment i n f uture r eturns ( Bailey, 1 981, p .7), v arious Mesolithic manifestations b elong. A t t his p oint t oo l ittle i s k nown a bout t he E uropean M esolithic t o d istinguish e ven m ajor r egional d ifferences i n s ubsistence s trategies, a lthough s uch m ust c ertainly h ave e xisted i n a n a rea a s
l arge
a nd d iverse
Returning
t o
t he
a s E urope . t erm
Mesolithic,
t hen,
o ne
c hronological a nd e conomic s ignificance t o t his t erm.
2 33
c an
s ee
F urther,
b oth t he
d istinctness o f t his p eriod b oth f rom w hat f ollowed a nd w hat p receded i t, a s well a s t he h istorical c ontinuity o f a ll t hree, i s c lear n ot j ust f or E urope, b ut g lobally. C lassification o f c ultures, s pecies, evolutionary s eries, g eological p hases, e tc., a lways r equires b y i ts nature t he d ividing o f c ontinuous d ata i nto d iscrete c ategories. We c an r ecognize t he a rbitrariness a nd i mprecision o f t he t erm M esolithic , a nd i n t hat way d eal w ith t he d istortion s uch c lassification i nvolves . A t t his s tage i t s eems r easonable t o d efine t he M esolithic i n E urope a s a p eriod r oughly b eginning w ith t he a melioration o f g lacial c onditions, a nd c haracterized e verywhere b y s ubsistence s trategy c hanges which i nvolved i ncreasingly c ontrolled e xploitation o f i ndigenous p lants, f ish , b irds, m ollusks , a nd m ammals, which a t l east i n s ome a reas, s uch a s t he I ron G ates G orge, p ermitted s edentism. T he n ature o f t hese s ubsistence c hanges a ppears t o h ave b een t he s ame a s c hanges s ome a reas o f t he w orld l ed t o c lasssical f ood p roduction.
which
i n
T he I ron G ates S ites T hroughout t his d iscussion t he t erm I ron G ates S ites h as b een u sed i n p reference t o e ither t he S chela C ladovei o r L epenski V ir C ulture. The t erm " culture" h as b een a bused a nd misused i n a rcheology, i nhibiting o ur a ttempts t o u nderstand a nd r econstruct t he p ast a nd p ast d evelopments. A rcheological s tudies a re n ormally b lessed w ith a m uch g reater
t ime
v ariation , a s a rcheological
p erspective well a s s tudies,
a nd
a much
l ess
r ich
p icture
o f
s patial
t he m ore u sually o bserved s hortcomings o f when c ompared t o e thnographic o nes. T he
a rcheological a buse o f t he t erm " culture" h as b een p articularly c lear i n s tudies o f M esolithic E urope , where s ites f rom S pain t o E ngland a nd Poland ( and Eastern E urope) h ave b een l abeled T ardenoisian c ulture. T he t endency t o c reate s patially e normous c ultures f rom l ack o f i nformation ( and o ne would t hus
i n a rcheology s tems e xpect t his t o b e
p articularly a pparent i n Mesolithic r esearch) a nd f rom t he k ind o f d irect i nformation a vailable . W ould o ne b e l ikely t o d ecide t hat Z uni r epresented a d istinct c ulture f rom H opi o n t he b asis o f n onperishable • r emains, a nd w ith v ery l imited ( or n o) u nderstanding o f t he s urrounding N avaho , A pache , e tc .? U ltimately , a rcheological a nd c ultural r esearch s hould h ave t he s ame p roblem o rientation , b ut t he u se o f c oncepts a nd t he d evelopment o f h ypotheses h ave t o b e g uided b y a s ense o f t he l imitations T he
o f
I ron
t he d ata . Gates
S ites
s eem
t o
f orm
a c onsistent
p icture
o f
a
s ubsistence s ystem d eveloped a round f ishing a nd i ncreasingly c ontrolled e xploitation o f i ndigenous p lants, a nd p erhaps p igs. O ther e vidence , s uch a s s tyles o f i nterment, a rt, b one a nd a ntler a nd s tone t ools, a lso s uggest a s ingle " style" o f d oing t hings, p erhaps w hat m ight b e c alled a s ingle t radition, o r c ulture, which we c an s ee ( or p erhaps f antasize), e volving o ver a f ew t housand y ears f rom t he b its a nd p ieces o f a rcheological d ata a vailable. T he c losed a nd u nique e nvironment o f t he G orge l ends c onviction t o t his f antasy, b ut more r ecently two s ites-Ostrovul C orbului a nd O strovul Mare-- h ave b een r eported o n t he R omanian s ide o f t he r iver d ownstream f rom t he d am , a nd o ut o f t he G orge o n t he f lood p lain ( BoronearI, 1 979b). T hese s ites " fit i n" with t he o thers, e ven t hough t hey a re i n a d istinctly d ifferent s etting. Another b it o f i nformation which h ighlights h ow l imited o ur u nderstanding i s, i s t he r eport o f M editerranean g astropods
2 34
( Dentalium s p. a nd N assa ( cyclope) n eritea) f rom C uina T urcului ( Grossu, 1 970). T his i s t he o nly e vidence f or e xternal t rade c onnections f or t he e ntire s eries o f s ites which o therwise s how ' u tilization o f l ocal r esources o nly . What i s t he s ignificance o f t hese s hells? T he f ocus o f E uropean a rcheological r esearch h as l ong b een F rance, even s outhern F rance. A lthough i nterest a nd e ffort i n t he r est o f E urope a nd i n Western A sia h as a ccelerated m ore r ecently , t he d ominance o f F rench methods a nd p erspectives p ersists. This p attern i s e ncouraged a nd c omplicated b y m odern p olitical d ivisions a nd l anguage b arriers . P rimary r esearch i s u sually p ublished i n t he n ative l anguage o f t he r esearcher, a nd t hat c ould b e R omanian, S erbo-Croatian, B ulgarian , U krainian , R ussian , H ungarian , P olish , C zech , t o n ame s ome o f t he o nes more c ommonly e ncountered i n t his r esearch. F ew i f a ny r esearchers c an r ead a ll o f t hese l anguages. F or a mixture o f p ractical, h istorical, a nd p olitical r easons, most E ast E uropean r esearchers l earn F rench , G erman , a nd E nglish , r ather t han R ussian o r U krainian a s p art o f t heir t raining . l earn l anguages o ther t han F rench,
W estern r esearchers a lso r arely G erman, English, a nd I talian.
P apers a t i nternational c onferences a nd i n s ome j ournals, which a re n ot i n t he n ative l anguage , a re i n F rench , G erman , o r E nglish . T he a ccess o f r esearchers
i n Eastern E urope,
a nd t he v ery l anguage(s) i n which
t hey a re f orced t o f ormulate t heir t houghts, o n E uropean p rehistoric s tudies. T he
m ap
s hown a s
F igure
1 8
s hows
t hus
c oncentric
f ixes a western b ias
r ings
d rawn
o n a m ap
o f E urope a nd Western A sia with t he I ron G ates G orge a s t he c enter . I t i s d isconcerting t o s ee t hat S oviet E stonia, f or e xample, i s c loser t o t he I ron Gates t han S outhern F rance o r England, o r t hat t he C rimea i s much c loser t han a ny o f t hese, a nd a lso much more a ccessible, s ince s everal h igh mountain r anges l ie b etween W estern F rance a nd England a nd t he I ron Gates, while f lood p lain i s mostly what l ies b etween i t a nd t he C rimea . A f ew a rcheologists , n otably T ringham a nd D olukhanov , h ave i ncluded c onsideration o f t he Moldavian s ites a long t he B ug-Dniestr R ivers i n t heir d iscussions o f S outheast Europe. Tringham ( 1971) m entions t he C rimea a lso i n a d iscussion o f t he M esolithic p eriod , b ut a las, even i n t he C rimea we h ear a bout " the C rimean T ardenosian" , a s t he S oviet l iterature T ringham r eferences a pparently l abels t his m aterial. T he t raditional v iew o f t he M esolithic i n E urope w as t hat i t was a d evolution f rom t he g lories o f b ig g ame h unting. I t was s een a s r epresenting t he g rubby a nd i nglorious s truggles o f t he d escendants t he b ig g ame h unters t o e ke o ut a l iving m uch m ore h eavily d ependent p lants
a nd
o ther
g athered
i tems,
s uch a s
s hellfish .
Small a nd
o f o n
m obile
b ands h uddled a round f ires o n c hilly n ights u ntil t he c ivilized f armers a ppeared f rom t he s outh . A t t his p oint t he s avages, o f w hom t here w ere i n any c ase v ery f ew, v anished, a nd t he f orward march o f " progress" o nce a gain b egan . T he r esearch e fforts i n t he I ron G ates G orge d uring t he p ast f ifteen y ears h ave s hown t hat , e ven i n t he t raditional t erms o f " progress" , which p oint o f v iew i s c ertainly n ot s upported h ere, t his r econstruction i s a f alse o ne , a t l east f or s ome a reas o f E urope . T he m onumental s tone s culptures f ound a t L epenski V ir m omentarily d rew t he
world's
a ttention
t o
t he
I ron
2 35
G ates
S ites.
They
r emain
a s
a
F igure 1 8:
T he I ron G ates G orge a s t he C enter o f 2 36
t he W orld
p ersistent r epudiation t o a ny i dea o f r efuge p opulations " eking" o ut a l iving . T he d ensity o f s ites f ound t o d ate i s a lso a c ontradiction t o. t he t raditional n otion o f a Europe s carcely i nhabited, awaiting t he f irst f armers. F inally, t he s edentism , r eminds u s t hat t he u sed f or a nalogies i nhabit o nly t he c ase f or t he f oragers o f t he
a rchitectural e vidence, i ndicating e thnographic g atherer—hunters we h ave a reas u nsuitable f or a griculture , n ot I ron G ates.
The Mesolithic a nd t he Mesolithic—Neolithic t ransformation o f E urope c annot b e r eassessed o n t he b asis o f t he I ron G ates s ites a lone . T his a rea i s u niquely r ich i n t erms o f r esources . B ut t he i ntensity o f Mesolithic
o ccupation
h ere
may
a lso
b e
i ndicative
o f
a g enerally
g reater p opulation d ensity f or Mesolithic Europe t han h as p reviously b een a ssumed. I f t his p roves t o b e t he c ase, t hen i t s uggests a n ew a ngle f rom which t o c onsider t he q uick s pread o f N eolithic f armers t hroughout E urope. F arming may h ave s pread s o f ar ( north) s o f ast i n E urope p artly b ecause l arge a reas were a lready o ccupied ( filled u p) b y g atherer—hunters, a nd n ot a vailable f or s ettlement b y i ntrusive ( food— p roducing) p opulations. D irections F or F uture R esearch A lthough t he u ltimate v alue a nd u tility o f m icrowear s tudies i s d isputed, i t i s c lear f rom t he r esults o f t hese s tudies t hat t he t raditional n otions o f r espectively , a re f alse .
what c onstitute " tools" and " debitage" I n t his s tudy, t he a cceptance o f t he ' Primary
d ata s et" o f 2 000 p lus p ieces a s a ctually r epresenting t he " tools" was a mistake. A s Nance ( 1979, p .352) h as p ointed o ut, i t would a lso b e a mistake t o a nalyze t he t otal c ollection f rom a s ite a nd a ssume t hat t his r epresented t he t otal s ite . I t would n ot n ecessarily, h owever , b e a m istake t o a nalyze a t otal c ollection . A s tratified r andom s ample o f excavation u nits s hould h ave b een t aken, f or e ach u nit o f which, a ll c hipped s tone was examined with t he s ame c are. The t radition o f i nitially s orting c hipped s tone, a nd s etting a side what h as b een c onsidered d ebitage , w ill s kew d ifferent a ssemblages i n d ifferent ways , s o t hat
i t i s d ifficult,
e ffects
o f
i f n ot i mpossible,
t o a llow f or o r c orrect
t he
s uch a p ractice .
A g reat
h andicap
i n
t his
r esearch was
t he
f ailure
R omanian m aterial, w hich i s o nly p artially p ublished,
t o e xamine
t he
i n a ny d etail.
- T he a pproach t o a nalyzing t he " style" o f s tone t ool p roduction p resented h ere c ould b e u seful i n e lucidating t he c onnections b etween t he i nhabitants o f M esolithic a nd N eolithic s ites, a nd u ltimately t he p rocesses o f c ulture c hange i nvolved . U se—wear a nalysis h as s erved t o d emonstrate
s ome
weaknesses
a nd
f alse
a ssumptions
u nderlying
t raditional t ypological s tudies o f c hipped s tone ( see a lso F lenniken , 1 985) , a nd p ursuit o f t his a pproach c ould u ltimately l ead t o a b etter u nderstanding o f s ubsistence a nd t echnology i n t he Mesolithic o r e lsewhere . F urther r esearch s hould i deally r epeat t his w ork o n a m ore r eliable s ample a nd e xtend t he a pplication o f t he t echnological a nalysis t o e arly N eolithic material within, a nd without, t he G orge. A nd whether t he t raditional t ypological a nalyses o f l ithics p ersist o r n ot, i t i s c ertainly t ime f or u s t o s ee t he universal u se o f f ine s creens a nd w et—sieving o n s ites o f t his,
2 37
a nd o ther,
p eriods.
A PPENDIX C ATALOGUE O F A RCHAEOLOGICAL S ITES I N T HE I RON G ATES G ORGE
A dgpostul L ui C limente -I ron A ge , 1 7 -18th c entury ( Boroneant,
B ronze A ge . 1 4 1 979, p .166).
-15th
c entury
a nd
A libeg -O ne o ccupational l evel -S chela C ladovei c ulture material with i ntrusive ( traded?) S tarcevo c eramics; r ectangular h earths w ith p lastered s tone b orders. Bile H erculane -T wo l evels : L ower l evel A urignacian ; p ollen d iagram t hrough H olocene ( Cärciumaru , 1 980 , p p .94, 9 5) ; u pper l evel e arly H olocene , " Azilian" ( Nicolhescu -P lop9or e i A l . P hunescu , 1 961) . B arcacila d e D robeta -u nexcavated s ite i n R omania. C limente I -C ave, 3 e arly o ccupational l evels: Aurignacian, P rotoM agdalenian a nd e arly N eolithic ( Cri ) ; t he A urignacian l evel h as l ots o f c hipped q uartz; l ater l evels : L ate N eolithic , B ronze A ge , 1 5 -17th c enturies ( Boroneant, 1 979, p .169). C limente I I -C ave , 4 o ccupational l evels : I ron A ge, M edieval ( Boroneant, 1 979,
R omanellian , p.175-176). p
C uina Turcului -D ubova - T hree l evels: C ladovei C ulture, e arly N eolithic. G aura C hindiei I - I ron A ge
a nd
Medieval
l ate N eolithic ,
L ate P leistocene,
o ccupations
( Boroneant,
S chela
1 979 ,
p .144). G aura C hindiei I I -E pipaleolithic , I ron A ge a nd M edieval l evels; wall p aintings, p robably f rom s everal t ime p eriods ( Boroneant , 1 979, p .1 . 51). G ornea C auni a -Upper P aleolithic l evel
( Boronea TI,
G ornea P azariete -U pper P aleolithic l evel G ornea V odneac
-Upper P aleolithic
a l 1 978,
1 981).
( ibid).
( Gravettian?) l evel
( ibid ;
C omori e t
p .24).
G ura C heii -P ost P leistocene l evel
( Cärciumaru,
1 980).
H ajduCka V odenica -E xcavated b ut u npublished s ite o n Y ugoslav b anks o f D anube; I coana
m aterials
-T wo
h earths,
S chela
b adly m ixed; M esolithic
C ladovei
s econd with
t hird l evel,
C ulture
l evels,
( ?),
l ater m aterials.
f irst
with
c ircular
r ectangular h earths with s tone b orders;
e arly N eolithic
( Cris).
2 39
L epenski V ir -A t l east 3 d istinct o ccupations, e arly N eolithic ( StarC 'evo). O rnitz -E arly N eolithic
( Cri )
l evel
t wo M esolithic ,
( Comori....,
1 978,
a nd o ne
p .68).
eolithic l evels a nd O strovul B anului -F our p ost P leistocene, p re - N e arly N eolithic l evel ( Comori...., 1 978, p p.24, 2 5). O strovul C orbului -T wo S chela C ladovei C ulture l evels ( Boroneant, 1 979b). O strovul Mare -T hree S chela C ladovei C ulture l evels; m ost r ecent h as s ome C ris -Star s C evo c eramics i n i t ( Boroneant, e t a l, 1 979). P adina -A t l east t wo d istinct o ccupations, o ne o f w hich i s M esolithic ; l ater l evel m ay b e N eolithic ( some c eramics) ; ( Jovanovig , 1 971a , b ). P eftera d e l a G ura P onicovei - C ri f a nd l ater l ater l evels; l ots o f q uartz ( Boroneant,
N eolithic , I ron A ge 1 979, p p.177-178).
P eftera L ivaditei -M ousterian, Upper P aleolithic, M edieval l evels ( Boroneant, 1 979, p .181). P e9tera Veterani
-M esolithic,
M edieval l evels
( Boroneant,
R azvrata -T wo S chela C ladovei
N eolithic, 1 979,
l evels ;
B ronze
I ron
Age,
Age
I ron
a nd
a nd
Age,
p .180). f irst
h as
o val h uts,
s econd h as
o val h earths. S chela C ladovei
- On D anubian
l evels I II a nd I V a re
p lain
-levels
I a nd I I
S chela C ulture,
e arly N eolithic .
V eterani T erasa -T wo l evels o f S chela C ladovei C ulture. V lasac -T hree M esolithic l evels a nd o ne e arly N eolithic l evel.
2 40
B IBLIOGRAPHY
A bbreviation u sed : S CIV,
S CIVA:
2 41
S tudii s i C ercetari d e I storie v eche ( si A rheologie) )
B IBLIOGRAPHY A hler, 1 970
S .
P rojectile P oint F orm a nd F unction a t R odgers t er, M issouri - M issouri A rchaeological R esearch S eries N o.8, C olumbia.
S helS ociety .
" Functional A nalysis o f N on o bsidian C hipped S tone A rtifacts: -T erms, V ariables a nd Q uantification",
1 979
B . H ayden , 3 28. A ndersen , B yrd, B .
J .
e d.,
p p.301-
L ithic U se-Wear A nalysis
" The d eer h unters: S tarr C arr r econsidered", W orld A rchaeology 1 3, 1 : 3 1-46.
E lson , M . M cGuire, R . M endoze, R . S taski, E . W hite, J . P . 1 981 B ahn , P . 1 983
" The N eolithic o f t he F rench P yrenees", i n A ncient F rance 6 000-2000 B .C. C . S carre, e d., T he U nivers i ty P ress,
B ailey, 1 981
G .N.
B ailloud, 1 974
B anarescu, e t a l 1 978
G .
" Concepts o f r esource e xploitation: c ontinuity a nd d iscontinuity i n p aleo-economy", W orld A rchaeology, 1 3, 1 : 1 -15. " The
F irst A griculturists:
4 000-1800 B .C." i n
S .
P iggot, D aniel a nd M cBurney, e ds., F rance B efore t he R omans, N oyes P ress, N ew J ersey, p p. 1 02-150. P .
B anu, A . 1 967 1 972 B arnes, 1 947
E dinburgh, ' pp.184 - 2 22.
" Einfluss d er D ämmung d er D onau i m G ebiet E isernen T ores A uf d ie F isch F auna", T ravaux-Museum D H istoire N aturelle G rigore A ntipa - T echnique D e L 'Institut F ra lwais d e D ondichery X IX ,
p.175 -178, p
A s q uoted i n B ufnila e t a l,
1 970.
d es
B ucuresti.
" Hydrology" i n I ron G ates C omplex A tlas p p.
1 56-161.
" The T echnique o f B lade P roduction i n M esolithic a nd
A .
N eolithic
T imes",
P roc. P rehistoric S ociety,
1 3:
1 01-113. B enac, 1 957
A .
B enac,
A .
B rodar, 1 958
" Crvena S tijena -1955", S arajevu,
M .
&
N .S.
X II:
" Crvena S tijena -1956", S arajevu,
N .S. X II:
2 42
G lasnik Z emaljskog M uzeja u
1 9 -50. G lasnik Z emaljskog M uzeja u
1 9 -50.
B erg, L . 1 948
F reshwater F ishes o f t he U SSR a nd A djacent C ountries p ublished f or t he N ational S cience F oundation, W ashington, D .C. b y S cientific T ranslations,
B ietti, 1 981
A.
V ol.
1 : 1 962
V ol. V ol.
2: 3:
P rogram
f or '
1 964 1 965
" The M esolithic C ultures i n I taly:
N ew
A ctivities
i n C onnection w ith U pper P aleolithic C ultural T raditions" i n M esolithikum i n E uropa, B . G ramsch, e d., V EB D eutscher V erlag d er W issenschaften B erlin, p p. 3 3-50.
B inford, L. 1 973
" Interassemblage V ariability: T he M ousterian a nd t he F unctional A rgument", i n T he Explanation o f C ulture C hange: M odels i n P rehistory, C . R enfrew e d.,
B leed, P. M eier, 1 980
t he I srael J erusalem.
&
M.
B ökönyi, S. 1 970 1 975
1 978
p p.
2 27-234 D uckworth,
" An O bjective T est o f
L ondon.
t he E ffects o f H eat T reatment
o n F lakeable S tone" American Antiquity, 5 02-507. " Animal R emains from L epenski V ir", p p. 1 702-1704.
v ol.45:
p p.
S cience v ol.167,
" Vlasac, a n e arly s ite o f d og d omestication", i n A .T. C lason e d., A rchaeozoological S tudies, N orthH olland P ublishing C o., A msterdam , p p. 1 20-131. " The
V ertebrate F auna o f V lasac",
i n
V lasac M ezo-
l itko N aselje n a D jerdapu, T om I I S erbian A cademy o f S ciences a nd A rts, v ol. D XII, D epartment o f H istori cal S ciences v ol. 5 , B eograd, p p. 3 5-68. B olomey, A. 1 973a
1 973b
" An O utline o f t he L ate E pipaleolithic E conomy o f t he ' Iron G ates': T he Evidence o n B ones", D acia, N .S. X VII, p p.41-52. " The p resent s tage o f k nowledge o f m ammal e xploita tion d uring t he e pipaleolithic a nd t he e arliest n eolithic o n t he t erritory o f R omania", i n J . M atolesi, e d., D omestikations f orschung u nd G esch i chte d er H austiere, I nternationales S ymposium i n B udapest, " The
B udapest,
p. p
1 97-203.
C orbiac B lade T echnique a nd O ther Experiments"
B ordes, F . & C rabtree, D . 1 969
T ebiwa 1 2,
B oroneant, V. 1 968 )
" Descoperiri G ravettiene i n P estera L ui R evista M uzeelor 6 , p p. 5 42-546:
2 :1-21.
2 43
C limente"
B oroneant, V . 1 969
" Dgcouverte d 'objets d 'art g pipalgolithique d ans l a z one d e P ortes-de-Fer d u D anube" R ivista d i S cienze P reistoriche X XI, p p.283-298.
1 970
" Un m ornint d in p eroada d e T ercere d e l a p eleolitc ul s uperior l a e pipaleolitic" S CIV, 2 1, 1 :129-132.
1 973
" Recherches A rcheologiques s ur l a c ulture S chela C ladovei d e l a z one d es P ortes d e F er" D acia, N .S. X VII p p.5-39.
1 979a
" Descoperiri a rcheologice i n u nele P e§teri D in D efileul D unärii" i n G rupul D e C er-Cetäri C omplexe " Portile
d e
F ier"
S eria
M onografica
e ditura a cademiei S ocialiste R omänia, S i s . N egrea, e ds. p p. 1 40-183.
S peologia,
T .
O rghidan
1 979b
" Probleme a le C ulturii S chela C ladovei-Lepenski V ir i n L umina N oilor C ercetäri", D robeta I V: 2 7-42.
1 980
" Betrachtungen l ithikum) i n
ü ber d as R umänien",
M useums f ür U r-und : p p.289-294. 14 /15 1 981a
" Implicaliile
E pipaläolithikum ( MesoV eröffentlichungen d es
F rühgeschichte
e conomico-sociale
P otsdam ,
a le
B and
i nceptitului
c ultivarii p lantelor i d omesticirii a nimalelor i n e pipaleoliticul d in R omänia" , T erra N ostra: I V p. p 11-119. 1 1 981b
P aleoliticul S uperior f i E pi-Paleoliticul D in Z ona P oililor D e F ier, R ezumatul t ezei d e d octorat, B ucu r esti. ;
B oronean , V ., C räciunescu, G ., S ting , I . 1 979
1 Raport P reliminar P rivind S äpäturile D e L a O strovul M are ( Campania 1 978)" i n M ateriale p . C ercetari A rh e ologice A X III-a S esiune A nualä d e R apoarte, M uzeul T grii C rilurilor O radea.
B oulding , e t a l 1 976
E .
H andbook o f I nternational D ata o n W omen, J ohn W iley &S ons.
B reazeanu, 1 970
G h.
" Caratere C limatice" i n B u pitä e t a l e d. M onografia Z onei P or glor d e F ier S tudiul H idrobiologic a l D an r ii s i a l a fluentilor.
B roadbent, 1 985
N .
B uczko, C S. M ., N eMeskgry, J ., S as, L . 1 978
" Comments
o n
T ransition
t o
F arming
E urope : E vidence f rom N orthern A rchaeological R eview, 1 8 ( 1-2), " Age
D ating o f
B ones f rom
i n
V lasac
B ased o n
N itrogen a nd F lourine C ontents" i n V lasac, p. 7 5-76. p
2 44
N orthern
S weden", N orwegian p.115-117. p
V ol
t heir I, I
B üller , 1 983
H .
" Methodological P roblems i n t he M icrowear A nalysis o f T ools S elected f rom t he N atufian S ites o f E l W ad a nd A In M allaha", t races d 'utilisation s ur l es O utils N eolithiques d u P roche O rient, M .C. C auvin, e d., M aison d e l 'Orient M gditerrangen , L yon, p p.1071 26.
B ulnitä ,
T h.,
B rezeanu, G h., O ltean , M .,
M onografia,
Z onei P orFilor d e
F ier
S tudiul
b iologic a l D unärii e i a l a fluentilor s ai, A cadamiei R epublicii S ocialiste k omänia.
H idroE ditura
P opescu, V ., M arianescu, E ., P runescu-Arion 1 970 C ärciumaru, M . 1 973
" Analyse
P ollinique
d es
C oprolithes
L ivrgs
" L'Analyse P ollinique d es C oprolites d e l a S tation A rcheologique d e V alsac", p. 3 1-34 i n V lasac M ezop l itko N aselje n a D jerdapu, T om I I, S erbian A cademy
1 978
o f S ciences a nd A rts, V ol. D XII, H istorical S ciences, V ol.5, B eograd.
D epartment
R epublicii S ocialiste R omänia, C asteel, 1 976
R .W.
F ish R emains i n A rchaeology,
M esolithic P relude,
B ucureeti.
A cademic P ress,
E dinburgh
U niversity
C lark, 1 980
G .
C lark, 1 952
J .G.D.
P rehistoric E urope -t he E conomic B asis,
C lark,
J .G.D.,
E xcavations a t S tar C arr,
C ambridge.
" Padina
G ame,
C lason,
1 979
P ress,
L ondon.
1 971 A .T.
a nd
S tarcevo:
P alaeohistoria, A .
XII, X
F ish
a nd
C attle",
p.142-173. p
" The I dentification o f S tyle i n L ithic W orld A rchaeology, 1 0, 2 :223-237.
A rtifacts"
T he A fian: A S tudy o f S tylistic V ariation i n a N ilotic I ndustry, D epartment o f A nthropology, S outh e rn M ethodist University, D allas, T exas.
C omori A rcheologice i n R egilinea P orSile d e F ier, 1 978
1 976.
E dinburgh.
1 980 C lose, 1 978
o f
M ediul g eografic i n p leistocenul s uperior e i c ultu rile p aleolitice d in R omänia, E ditura Ä cademiei
1 980
e t a l 1 954,
P ar
Q uelques S tations A rchelogiques d es D eux B ords d u D anube d ans L a Z one d es P ortes d e F er", D ACIA X VII, p.53-60. p
a rts a l R .S. R omänia.
2 45
B ucureeti,
M uzeul d e
C ook, S. 1 972
P rehistoric D emography, M cCaleb M odule in A nthropolo gy, A ddison-Wesley R eading, M ass.
C ook, S . & H eizer, R . 1 965
C rabtree, 1 967a
" The
q uantitative a pproach t o t he r elation
b etween
p opulation a nd s ettlement s ize" C ontributions o f t he U niversity o f C alifornia A rchaeological R esearch F acility, N o. 6 4. D .
" Notes o n Experiments i nF lintknapping: 3 . A k napper's R aw M aterials" T ebiwa 1 0:1: 8 -24.
F lint-
1 967b
" Notes o n Experiments in F lintknapping : 4 . T ools u sed f or m aking f laked s tone a rtifacts" T ebiwa 1 0:1: 6 0-73.
1 970
" Flaking s tone t ools with W ooden I mplements" S cience 1 69:3941: 1 46-153.
1 972
A n I ntroduction t o F lintworking, O ccasional P apers o f t he I daho S tate U niversity M useum N umber 2 8, P ocatello, I daho.
1 973a
" Experiments 1 6: 1 0-45.
1 973b
" The O btuse A ngle a s a F unctional E dge", 4 6-53.
C rabtree, D .& B utler, B .R.
i n R eplicating H ohokam P oints",
T ebiwa
T ebiwa
" Notes o n Experiments i n F lintknapping: T reatment o f S ilica M aterials" T ebiwa 7 :1:
1 6:
1 . H eat 1 -6.
1 964 C rabtree, D avis, 1 968
D .&
E .
C rabtree, D.
&
" Experimental M anufacture o f W ooden I mplements w ith • T ools o f F laked S tone", S cience, 1 59, 3 813:426-428.
" Edge-ground cobbles w est" T ebiwa,
D avis, D. 1 978
L ithics a nd S ubsistence: t he A nalysis o f S tone T ool U se i n P rehistoric E conomies, V anderbilt U niversity P ublications
D ibble,
H .&
W hittaker, J. 1 981 D olukhanov , P. 1 973
1, 1
a nd B lade-making in t he N orth-
S wanson 1 968
2 :50-58.
i n A nthropology N o.20,
T enn.
" New Experimental Evidence o n t he R elation B etween P ercussion F laking a nd F lake V ariation", J ournal o f A rchaeological S cience, 8 , p p.283-296. " The
N eolithisation o f E urope:
e cological
a pproach"
i n
a tion o f C ulture C hange, 1 977
N ashville,
E cology
a nd
D uckworth,
E conomy in
L ondon.
2 46
C .
a c hronological a nd R enfrew
e d., Explan -
p p.329-342. N eolithic E astern E urope,
'
D onnan , C . & M oseley, M . 1 968
" The U tilization of F lakes f or C leaning American Antiquity 3 3: p p.502-503.
D umitrescu, 1 972
1 Microclimatic A tlas, p .153.
E.
F ish, P aul n .d.
C omplexes"
i n
F ish"
I ron G ates C omplex
" Some T axonomic I mplication f or M orphological V ariability i n L ithic A rtifacts". P aper d elivered a t t he 7 3rd A nnual m eeting o f t he American A nthropological A ssociation , M exico C ity, M exico, 1 5 p ages.
F lenniken , J .J. 1 985
" Stone T ool R eduction T echniques a s C ultural M arkers", i n S tone T ool Analysis E ssays i n H onor o f D on. E .Crabtree, M . F lew, J . W oods a nd M . P avesic, e ds., U niversity o f N ew M exico P ress, p p.265-276.
A lbuquerque,
F rayer , D. 1 978
E volution o f t he D entition i n U pper P aleolithic a nd M esolithic E urope, A rkansas P ublications i n A nthrop ology, p .10.
F rison , 1 968
" A F unctional A nalysis o f C ertain C hipped Stone T ools", American Antiquity, 3 3: p p.149-155.
G .
G arson , A. 1 980
" Comment u pon t he E conomic P otential o f F ishU tiliza tion i n R iverine E nvironments a nd P otentialA rchae p.562p o logical b iases" American A ntiquity, 4 5, 3 : 5 67.
G igov, A. 1 972
G lavan, V .& M . G eanana
" Pollen A nalysis" i n D .
S rejovi
E urope's F irst
M onumental S culpture: N ew D iscoveries a t L epenski V ir, S tein a nd D ay, N ewY ork. " Soils" i n I ron G ate C omplex A tlas,
p .154.
1 972 G ould, R. 1 973
" Use-wear o n W estern D esert A borigine S tone T ools: A R eply t o M essrs. H ayden a nd K aminga", N ewsletter o f L ithic T echnology V ol.
G ould, R ., D . K oster & A . S ontz 1 971 G raf, J akob 1 961, 1968 G rayson , D. 1 975
I, I
n o.
2 .
" The L ithic A ssemblage o f t he W estern D esert A borigi nes 1 69.
o f A ustralia", American A ntiquity,
A nimal L ife of E urope,
F rederich
W arne
3 6:
p.149p
&C o. L td.
L ondon. " On t he Q uantification o f V ertebrate A rchaeofaunas" nd T heory, M . i n A dvances i n A rchaeological M ethod a B . S chiffer e d. V ol. 2 , p p. 1 99-237.
2 47
G rossu, 1 970
A l.
H ansen, J ., & J . R enfrew
O bservaIii A supra G asteropodelor D escoperite i n S traturile R omanello-Aziliene d e l a C uina T urc ului", S CIV, 2 1: p p.45-47. " Paleolithic-Neolithic Seed R emains a t F ranchthi C ave, G reece", N ature, 2 71: p p.349-352.
1 978 • H assan , F. 1 981 H ayden , B. 1 978
D emographic A rcheology, A cademic P ress.
" Snarks i n A rchaeology: o r I nter-assemblage v ariab ility i n l ithics ( a v iew f rom t he Antipodes)" i n D . D avis e d., L ithics a nd S ubsistence, p p. 1 79-198.
1 979
e d. L ithic U se-wear A nalysis, A cademic P ress,
1 979a
P aleolithic R eflections: A ustralian W estern D esert, A boriginal S tudies,
N .Y.
L ithic T echnology o f t he A ustralian I nstitute o f
C anberra.
1 979b
" Snap, S hatter, a nd S uperfractures: U se-wear o f S tone S kin S crapers", in B . H ayden , e d. p p.207-209.
1 980
" Confusion i n the b ipolar w orld : B ashed P ebbles a nd S plintered P ieces", L ithic T echnology, I X : p p.27.
H ayden , B ., & J . K amminga 1 973a 1 973b
" Gould,
K oster,
a nd S ontz o n
' Microwear': A
C ritical
R eview", N ewsletter o f L ithic T echnology I I,
" Rejoinder",
N o.l.
N ewsletter o f L ithic T echnology, V ol.2,
N o.2. 1 979
" An I ntroduction t o U se-Wear: H ayden ,
H edrick,
U .P.
1 919 T ., &
R . H eizer 1 973 H ibbs, J. 1 983 •
H iggs, E ., & M . J arman 1 972 H ill, J. 1 970
t he f irst C LUW" i n B.
L ithic U se-Wear Analysis,
S turtevant's N otes o n E dible P lants, p any,
H ester,
e d.,
A lbany,
p.1-13. p
J .B. L yon
C or n-
N .Y.
" Arrow P oints o r K nives: C omments o n t he p roposed f unction o f ' Stockton P oints ", American A ntiquity 3 8:
p.90-96. p
"The N eolithic o f B rittany a nd N ormandy", in A ncient F rance 6 000-2000 b .c., C S carre, e d., t he U niversity P ress, E dinburgh, p p.271-323. " The O rigins of A nimal a nd P lant H usbandry" i n E . H iggs, e d., P apers i n E conomic P rehistory, C ambridge. B roken K P ueblo,
A nthropological P apers o f
e rsity of A rizona,
2 48
N o.
1 8,
t he Univ-
U . A rizona P ress,
T ucson.
H olley, G ., & T . D el B ene 1 981
J ournal o f A rchaeological S cience,
I ancu, 1 972
" Geography" in I ron G ates C omplex A tlas, 2 2.
" An
M .
T he I ron G ates
E valuation
o f
K eeley's
M icrowear
A pproach",
p p.337-352.
8 ,
p p.149-150:
T he A cademy o f t he S ocialist R epublic o f R omania.
C omplex A tlas 1 972 J acobsen , 1 973
T .
" Excavation i n t he F ranchthi Cave, P art I " H esperia, 4 2, N o. 1 : p p.45-88. P art I I" H esperia
1 973a
" Excavation i n t he F ranchthi C ave, 4 2, N o. 3 : p p.254-283.
1 974
" New R adiocarbon D ates f rom F ranchthi C ave: A P rel iminary N ote R egarding C ollection o f S amples b y M eans o f F lotation", J ournal o f F ield A rchaeology, 1 : p p.303-304.
1 981
" Franchthi C ave a nd t he B eginning o f S ettled V illage L ife i n G reece" H esperia, 5 0: p p.303-319.
J acobsen , T ., D . V an H orn 1 974
&
" European d eer E conomies a nd t he a dvent of
J arman, M.R. 1 972
J ochim , 1 976
" The F ranchthi C ave F lint S urvey : S ome P reliminary R esults ( 1974)", J ournal o f F ieldA rchaeology, V ol. 1 : p p.305-308. t he
N eo-
l ithic", P apers i n E conomic P rehistory, E. S . H iggs, e d., C ambridge U . P ress, p p.125-148. H unter-Gatherer S ubsistence a nd S ettlement: A d ictive M odel, A cademic P ress, N ew Y ork.
M .
P re-
" Elements o f t he E arly N eolithic A rchitecture i n t he
J ovanovi , B. 1 968
I ron G ates G orge a nd T heir F unctions", I ugoslavica I X : p p.1-9.
1 969
f t he I ron G ate G roup o f t he " Chronological F rames o n A rchaeologia I ugoslavica E arly N eolithic P eriod" i X : p p.23-38.
1 971a
" Padina K od G ospodjinog V ira Istra nvanja 1 968,1969" M aterijali V I, p p.65-70.
1 971b
" La p rehistoire du D jerdap S uperieur", X XII,
K amminga, V an N oten
J.,
&
A rchaeologia
S tarinar N .S.
p p.1-22.
" Discussions" i n A nalysis,
p p.
B .
2 89-299.
1 979
2 49
H ayden
ed.,
L ithic U se-Wear
K eeley, L. 1 974
" Technique a nd M ethodology i n M icrowear S tudies: A C ritical R eview", W orld A rchaeology 5 (3): p p.32336. 3
1 974
" The M ethodology o f M icrowear A nalysis: A c omment on N ance" American Antiquity, 3 9: p p.126-128.
1 977
" The F unctions o f P aleolithic F lint T ools", t ificA merican, V ol. 2 37, N o. 5 : p p.108-126.
1 978
" Microwear P olishes R esults" i n D . p.163-178. p
1 980
o n
D avis,
F lint:
e d.,
S ome
S cien-
E xperimental
L ithics a nd S ubsistence,
E xperimental D etermination of S tone T ool U ses, C hicago P ress, C hicago.
U .
K eller, C. 1 966
" The D evelopment of E dge-Damage P atterns o n S tone T ools", M an 1 :4: p p.501-511.
K lein ,
" Calibration o f R adiocarbon D ates", 2 : p p.103-150.
J .,
J . C . L erman , P . E . D amon , & E . K . R alph 1 982
W . H .
R adiocarbon,
F reeman
a nd
C o.,
2 4,
K ummel, B. 1 970
H istory o f t he E arth,
S an
L awrence, R. 1 979
" Experimental Evidence f or t he S ignificance o f A ttr ibutes U sed i n E dge-Damage A nalysis", i n B . H ayden,
F rancisco.
e d.,
L ithic U se-Wear A nalysis,
p p.113-122.
" An A ddition t o N aroll's S uggested F loor A rea a nd. S ettlement P opulation R elationship", American A nti-
L eBlanc, S. 1 971
q uity 3 6(2):
p p.210-211.
L engyel, I. 1 978
" Laboratory E xamination o f t he V lasac H uman B one F inds" i n V lasac...Tom I I, p p. 261-284.
L etica, Z. 1 974
" Sahranjivanje i P ogrebni R ituali U K ulturi L epens kog V ira" ( Burying a nd b urial r ituals i n t he L epens ki V ir C ulture) M aterijali -10, p p.51-57 B eograd.
L imp, W . F ., & V . A . R eidhead 1 979 L inton ,
"An E conomic Evaluation o f t he P otential o f Fish U tilization i n R iverine E nvironments" AmericanA ntiq uity,
D .,
F . M oseley 1 970 L ongacre, W. 1 976
&
" The
4 4,
p p.70-78.
G eological
H istory, e ds.,
1 :
V ol.
I ,
A ges"
i n
I . E dwards,
T he
C ambridge A ncient
C . G add a nd N . H ammond,
C ambridge U niversity P ress,
p p.1-34.
" Population D ynamics a t t he G rasshopper P ueblo, A riz ona", i n D emographic A nthropology, e d. E . A ubrow , p p.169-184, U . N ew M exico P ress.
2 50
L oze, 1 973
I .
" Mesolithic A rt o f E astern B altic R egion", i n T he M esolithic i n E urope, S .Kozlowski, e d., p p. 3 81-398.
L ubbock, 1 865 L ubell, 1 971
L yman, 1 979
J .
P rehistorlic T imes, a s c ited i n M esolithic P relude, G .Clark,1980, E dinburgh U niversity P ress, E dinburgh.
D .
" The F akhurian :
A N ew L ate P aleolithic I ndustry f rom
U pper E gypt". P aper p resented a t t he P anafrican C on g ress o n P rehistory a nd t he S tudy o f t he Q uartern ary, A ddis A baba. R . L .
L ynott, 1 975
" Available M eat f rom F aunal R emains: A C onsideration p o f T echniques", American A ntiquity, 4 4, 3 : p.5365 46.
M .
" Explanation
o f
M icrowear
P lains Anthropologist,
M acDonald ,
G .,
&
" Some
A spects
o f
P atterns
2 0(68):
M icroscope
o n
G ravers",
p p.121-128. A nalysis a nd
P hoto-
D , S anger 1 968
m icrography o f L ithic A rtifacts",American Antiquity, 3 3: p p.237-239.
M alez, 1 967
" Gornjopleistocenska F auna C rvene S tijene", G lasnik X Z emaljskog M uzeja. XI/XXII--Sarajevo p p. 6 7-79.
M .
M arkovic, 1 975
C .
M arkovic M arjanovi , 1 978 M arshak, 1 981
" The S tratigraphy a nd C hronology o f t he O dmut C ave" , A rchaeologica I ugoslavica, 1 5: 7 -12. " Geology", i n V lasac a M esolithic S ettlement i n t he I ron G ates, V ol. I I, S erbian A cademy o f S ciences a nd A rts, B eograd, p p.11-30.
J .
" Epipaleolithic, E arly N eolithic I conography: A C ogn itive, C omparative A nalysis o f t he L epenski V ir/ V lasac I conography a nd S ymbolism , I ts R oots a nd I ts L ater I nfluence". P aper r ead a t t he I nternational
A .
S ymposium o n t he C ulture o f L epenski V ir a nd t he P roblems o f t he F ormation o f N eolithic C ultures i n S outheastern a nd C entral E uröpe, R ömisch-Germani sches M useum. " An E dge W ear
M cConaughy, M . 1 978
K öln,
W est G ermany.
S tudy o f
f rom M oorehead C ave,
S elected
T exas",
A rcheology o f M oorehead T exas, P h.D. D issertation , M eltzer,, 1 981
F lake S tone T ools
i n R . M aslowski,
T he
C ave: V al V erde C ounty, U niversity o f P ittsburgh.
" A S tudy o f S tyle a nd F unction i n a C lass o f T ools" J ournal o f F ield A rchaeology, V ol.8, N o.3: p.313p
D . J .
3 26. M ikkelsen , E ., 0 . J ohansen 1 985
&
" Comments o n T ransition t o F arming i n E urope: A N orwegian P erspective" N orwegian l ogical R eview, 1 8 ( 1-2), p p.118-120.
2 51
N orthern A rchaeo -
M ills,
N .
" The N eolithic o f S outhern F rance", in A ncient F rance 6 000-2000 b .c., C . S carre, e d., T he U nivers ity P ress, E dinburgh, p p.91-145.
v M isit, V., D . C oli & A . D ini 1 972 M ogo9anu, 1 972
F.
" Ecological-Phytocenological I nvestigation", i n D . S rejoviC, E urope's F irst M onumental S culpture: N ew D iscoveries a t L epenski V ir, S tein a nd D ay, N ew Y ork, p p.171-181. " Information G gngrale s ur l e P algolithique d u Banat ( Sud-Ouest d e l a R oumanie)", D acia N .S. X VI: p p.52 7.
M oore, A. 1 979
" A p re-Neolithic F armer's V illage o n t heE uphrates" , S cientific American 2 41, 2 : p p.62-70.
M oss, E. 1 983
A bu H ureyra,
" A M icrowear A nalysis o f B urins a nd P oints F rom T ell S yria",
T races
D 'Utilisation
O utils N golithiques D u P roche O rient, e d., M aison d e l 'Orient M gditerangen, M utihac, 1 972
V.
s ur l es
M .-C. C auvin, p p.143-161.
" Geology" i n T he I ron G ates C omplex A tlas, p p. 1 461 48. A cademia R epublicii S ocialiste R omänia G rupul d e C ercetari C omplexe, " Porlile d e F ier", B ucureyti.
N albant, T. T . 1 970
" Citeva O bservatii A spura R esturil o r d e P eyti D esc operite i n L ocuirile R omanello-Aziliene ( I-II) D e L a C uina T urcului-Dubova", S CIV, 2 1 I , p p. 4 1-43.
N ance, 1 971
" Functional I nterpretations f romM icroscopic A nalys is", American Antiquity, 3 6, 3 : p p.361-366.
J . D .
1 979
N andris, 1 972
" Fundamental S tatistical C onsiderations i n t he S tudy o f M icrowear" , i n B . H ayden, e d., L ithic U se-Wear A nalysis, p p. 3 51-363. J.
" Review o f E urope's F irst M onumental S culpture: N ew D iscoveries a t L epenski V ir", , by D . S rejovi , in P roc. P rehistoric S ociety,
3 8:
p p.426-429.
N aroll, R. 1 962
" Floor A rea a nd S ettlement P opulation", American Antiquity, 2 7: p p.587-589.
N emeskgri, J. 1 972
T he I nhabitants o f L epenski V ir", i n E urope's F irst M onumental S culpture: N ew D iscoveries a t L epenski V ir,
D .
S rejoviC ' ,
S tein a nd D ay,
N ew Y ork ,
p p.
1 90-
2 04. 1 978
" Demographic S tructure o f t he V lasac E pipaleolithic P opulation",in V lasac M esolitko N aselje n a D jerdapu T om I I S erbian A cademy o f S ciences a nd A rts, M onog raphs V ol. D XII, D epartment o f H istorical S ciences, V ol. 5 , B eograd, p p. 9 7-133.
2 52
.
N emeskgri, J ., I . L engyel 1 978
&
" The R esults o f P aleopathological i n V lasac...Tom I I, p p. 2 31-247.
N emeskgri, J ., L . S zathmary 1 978
&
" Analysis o f t he V ariations o f Q uantitative T raits", i n V lasac...Tom I I, p p. 1 57-175.
N ewcomer ,
M . H .,
L . K eeley 1 979
& " Testing a M ethod o f M icrowear A nalysis w ith Experim ental F lint T ools" , i n B . H ayden e d., L ithic U se W ear A nalysis, p p.195-205.
N icoläescuP lop9or , D . 1 976
p ologie,
N icoläescu-
" Azilianul d e l a Bile
P lop9or 9 i a l P äunescu 1 961
c ercetäri",
N ie, N . H . 1 975
S tatistical P ackage f or t he S ocial E dition, M cGraw-Hill, N ew Y ork.
O dell, 1 975
E xaminations",
" Deux c as d e M ort V iolente D ans
L 'Epipalgolithique
F inal d e S chela C ladovei" A nnuaire R oumain D 'Anthro-
e t a l.
1 3,
p.3-5. p
S CIV 2 ,
H erculane i n
l umina
n oilor
p.203-210. p
S ciences,
2 nd
" Micro-wear i n P erspective: A S ympathetic R esponse t o L awrence H . K eeley" W orld A rchaeology 7 , 2 : p p.226-240.
G .
tude d es " Problames d ans lIg
1 983
t races
d 'utilisation",
i n T races D 'Utilisation s ur l es O utils N golithiques D u P roche O rient, M . C . C auvin , e d., M aison d e l 'Orl ent M gditerrangen , L yon, p p.17-24. O sborne, 1 965
D .
" Chipping R emains a s a n I ndication C hange a t W etherill M esa", T . C ampbell, b utions o f
t he
W etherill
M emoirs, S ociety p.30-44. p P äunescu, 1 968
A l.
f or
4 :
A rchaeological
American
" Arta E pipaleolitica d e l a R ivista M uzeelor,
o f C ultural' e d., C ontriP roject,
A rchaeology,
C uina
N o.19:
T urcului-Dubova",
p.342-348. p
1 970a
" Epipaleoliticul D e L a C uina T urcului-Dubova", 2 1 N o: p p.3-47.
1 970b
E volu p _a U neltelor l A rmelor D e P iatra C ioplitä D escoperite P er T eritoriul R omäniei, E ditura A cademi ei R epublicii S ocialiste R omänia,
1 980
S CIV,
B ucure9ti.
" Evol l4ia I storicä P e T eritoriul R omäniei D in P aleol ithic P in äL a inceptul N eoliticului", 4 : p p.519-545.
2 53
S CIVA,
3 1,
N o
P ayne, S. 1 972
1 973
1 975a
" Partial R ecovery a nd S ample B ias:
P erles, C atherine 1 973 1 976
R esults
o f
Excavation i n t he F ranchthi C ave " Animal B ones" , in " " , T . W . J acobsen , H esperia X LII, 1 969-1971, P art I 1 : p p.45-88. " Partial Recovery a nd S ample B ias", i n A .T. C lason , e d" A rchaeozoological S tudies , l ishing, Amsterdam.
1 975b
T he
S ome S ieving Experiments" , in P apers i n E conomic. p P rehistory, E . H iggs, e d., C ambridge, p. 4 9-64.
N orth-Holland
P ub -
" Faunal C hange a t F ranchthi C ave f rom 2 0,000 B .C . t o 3 ,000 B .C." i n A . T . C lason, e d., A rchaeozoological S tudies, North-Holland P ublishing C o ., Amsterdam, p. 1 20-131. p " The C hipped S tone I ndustries" , "Excavation i n t he F ranchthi C ave , I",
H esperia X LII,
N o.
1 :
i n T . J acobsen , 1 969-1971, P art
p.72-82. p
" Rapport P reliminaire S ur l es
I ndustries
L ithiques
M esolithiques D e L a G rotte d e F ranchthi ( A .rgolide , Grece)" U .I.S.P.P. I X e me C ongres, N ice, V eme s ec t ion-lere s ous-section. P iette , E. 1 889
" L 'Epoque
d e
t ransition i ntermediare
e ntre
räge
d u
r enne e t repoque d e l a p ierre p olie, i n C ongr . I nt. d 'Anthr . e t d 'Arch. Prehist. C .R. X th S ession. Paris a s c ited i n G . C lark, M esolithic P relude, E dinburgh U niversity P ress, 1 980.
P lew, M . & J . Woods . 1 985
' observation o f E dge D amage a nd T echnological E ffects o n P ressure-Flaked S tone T ools" , i n S tone
P log , F. 1 975
' Demographic S tudies i n S outhwestern P rehistory" , i n P opulation S tudies i n " Archeology a nd B iological
T ool A nalysis, E ssays i n H onor o f M . P lew , J . Woods , a nd M . P avesic , o f N ew M exico P ress, A lbuquerque.
D on E . C rabtree , e ds . , U niversity
A nthropology: a S ymposium" , A . S wedlund , e d" Amer i can Antiquity 4 0 ( 2) : p p .94-103, M emoir 3 0 . P op , E . 1 929
" pollenanalyse e iniger M oore d er O stkarpathen ( Dorna L ucina)" , B uletinul G rädinii B otanice p _ a l Muzeulu i B otanic, C luj I X, p p.81-210, c ited i n C ärciumaru, 1 978.
1 942
" Beiträge
Z ur
G eschichte
d er
W älder
N ord
S iebensbürgens" , B uletinul G rAld inii B otanice s i a l Muzeului B otanic , C luj X XII, p .101-177, c ited i n p C ärciumaru ,
1 978 .
2 54
P op,
E .,
N . B o9caiu, & V . L upfa 1 970 P osea, C r., M . G rigore, &
" Analiza S poro-PolincX A S edimentelor D e L a C uina T urcului-Dubova", A nexa n r. 1 t o A l. P gunescu, 1970, S CIV, 2 1, n o. 1 : p p.3-47.
" Terraces a ndL eveling S urfaces", C omplex A tlas, p . 1 52.
i n T he I ron G ates
N . P opescu 1 972 P rice, 1 983
T . D .
P rice,
T . D ., &
J . A . B rown 1 985 P rinz, B.
" The E uropean M esolithic", ( 4), p p.761-778.
P rehistoric H unter-Gatherers T he u ral C omplexity, A cademic P ress,
S tone T ools,
1 982
American A ntiquity,
C ultural
Emergence of C ultO rlando.
C ontinuity,
A daptations o n t he L ower D anube, U niversity o f P ittsburgh.
4 8
a nd
M esolithic
P h.D. D issertation,
" Ground S tone T ools", i n D ivostin a nd t he N eolithic i n C entral S erbia, A . M cPherron a nd D . Srejovia,
[ in p ress]
e ds. " Investigations C oncerning t he T hermal A lteration o f
P urdy, B. 1 974
S ilica M inerals: 1 7: p p.37-66.
1 975
" Fractures f or t he A rchaeologist", i n L ithic T echnol ogy: M aking a nd U sing S tone T ools, E . S wanson ( ed.) M outon ,
R adovanovic, I. 1 981
R anoholocenska
K remena
I ndustrija
P adina U D jerdapu , A rheolotki G radja, K njiga 4 , B eograd.
R adulesco, P .C., &P . S amson 1 962
R aikes, . R.L. 1 978
L okaliteta B eograd,
( 2/3),
" Climate
p.282-320. p o f
t he M editerranean a nd M iddle E ast s emi-
a rid z ones f rom t he M esolithic t o t he C alcolithic", P apers i n I talian A rchaeology I : T he L ancaster S emi nar, B . A . R . S upplementary S eries 4 1(1) H . B lake, T .
I .
S a
I nstitut
"Sur u n c entre d e d omestication d u M outon d ans l e M 6solithique d e l a g rotte, " La A dam" e n D obrogea" , Z eitschrift f ur T ierzüchtung a nd Z üchtungsbiologie, 7 6
1 958
T he H ague.
" The D ating o f R adio-Carbon S amples" i n Europe's. F irst M onumental S culpture: N ew D iscoveries at L epen ski V ir, D . S rejovi , p p. 2 05-210.
Q uitta, H. 1 972
R akovec,
a n A rcheological A pproach", T ebiwa
P otter,
D . W hitehouse,
e ds.,
p. p
1 -24.
" Pleistocenski s isavci u p ipe nu C rvena S tijena
K od
P etrovi & u C rnoj C on ", G lasnik Z emaljskog, M uzeja, S arajevo N .S.
1 3:
2 55
p.65-75. p
R enfrew, 1 973
S ackett, 1 977
J .
J .
" Plant R emains: a n I nterim R eport", i n T . J acobsen, "Excavation i n t he F ranchthi C ave, 1 969-1971, P art I ", H esperia, X LII N o. 1 , p p.66-68. " The M eaning o f S tyle i n A rchaeology : A G eneral M odel", A merican A ntiquity, 4 2: p p.369-380. rance", " The N eolithic o f W est-Central F nd T heir F rance, N eolithic Societies a
S carre, C. 1 983
6 000 -2000 b .c., P ress, E dinburgh, S chiffer, 1 979
M .
S emenov , S. 1 964 1 970
C . S carre, p.223-270. p
S heehan ,
M ., &
T he U niversity
" The P lace o f L ithicU se-Wear S tudies i n B ehavioral A rchaeology", i n B . H ayden, ed., L ithic U se-Wear Analysis, p p. 1 5-25. P rehistoric T echnology,
L ondon.
" Forms a nd F unctions o f the Q uartar, 2 1: p p.1-20.
S encu, V ., & I . Z ävoianu 1 972
e d.,
i n Ancient L andscapes,
O ldest
S tone
T ools",
1 Morphometry a nd M orphology o f t he D anube Channel", i n I ron G ates C omplex A tlas, p p. 1 50-152.
" Pollen A nalysis o f F ranchthi C ave
S ediments:
P re-
D . W hitehead 1 973
l iminary R esults", i n T . J acobsen " Excavation i n t he F ranchthi C ave, 1 969-1971, P art I ", H esperica, X LII N o. 1 : p p.68-72.
S heets, P. 1 973
" Edge A brasionD uring B iface M anufacture", Antiquity, 3 8: p p.215-218.
S mith, B. . 1975
1 979
" Toward a M ore A ccurate E stimation o f
t he M eat Y ield
o f A nimal S pecies a t A rchaeological S ites", i n A . T . C lason, e d. A rchaeozoological S tudies, N orth-Holland P ublishing C o., Amsterdam , p p.99-106. " Measuring the S elective U tilization o f A nimal S pecies b y P rehistoric H uman P opulations" , American A ntiquity,
S okal,
R ., &
4, 4
1 ,
p.155-160. p
P rinciples o f N umerical T axonomy,
W . H .
P . S neath 1 963
C ompany,
S peth , J. 1 972
" Mechanical b asis o f P ercussion F laking", Antiquity, 3 7: p p.34-60.
1 974
American
F reeman
&
S an F rancisco.
American
" Experimental I nvestigations o f H ard-Hammer P ercussi on F laking", T ebiwa, 1 7, 1 : p p.7-36.
2 56
S peth, 1 975
J .
" Miscellaneous S tudies i n Hard-Hammer P ercussion F laking : The E ffects o f Oblique Impact", American A ntiquity,
4 0,
2 :
p.203-207. p
ore S ize i n Hard' The Role o f P latform Angle a nd C
1 981
H ammer P ercussion F laking" , 1 0, N o. 1 , p p.16-21. • S peth , J . , & G . J ohnson 1 974
L ithic T echnology ,
" Problems i n t he U se o f C orrelation f or t he I nvestig ation o f T ool K its a nd A ctivity A reas" , i n C ultural C hange a nd _ Continuity E ssays i n H onor o f J ames B ennett Griffin , C . C leland, N ew Y ork, p p.35-58.
S rejovi , D. 1 972
e d.,
Academic Press,
E urope 's F irst Monumental S culpture : N ew D iscoveries a t L epenski V ir, S tein a nd D ay, N ew Y ork.
1 975
S rejoviC , Z . L etica 1 978
V ol .
" The O dmut C ave--A N ew F acet o f t he Mesolithic C ult u re o f t he B alkan P eninsula" , A rchaeologica I ugoslav ica, 1 5: p p.3-12. D .,
S tothert , K. 1 974
&
V lasac, M ezolitko N aselje n a D jerdapu , T om I , A rxeologija B eograd , S erbian A cademy o f S ciences a nd A rts Vol. D XII, D epartment o f H istorical S ciences, V ol.5. T he L ithic T echnology o f t he S anta E lena P eninsula, E cuador: A M ethod f or t he A nalysis o f T echnologi cally S imple S tone Work , Y ale U niversity , P h .D . d issertation.
S ussman , C. 1 985
" Microwear o n q uartz : f act o r fiction?" , A rchaeology, 1 7(1), p p.101-111.
T ringham, R. 1 971
H unters, F ishers, a nd F armers 6 000-3000 B .C., L ondon.
1 973
o f
World
E astern E urope
" The M esolithic o f S outheastern E urope" , i n T he Mesolithic i n Europe, S . Kozlowski, e d., Warszawa p p.
5 51-572.
Tringham,R .,
" Experimentation i n t he F ormation of E dge D amage :
G . - Cooper, C . O dell,
N ew A pproach t o L ithic A nalysis", A rchaeology, 1 : p p.171-196.
A
J ournal o f F ield
B . V oytek , &A . W hitman 1 974 V aughan , P. 1 982
F unctional A nalysis o f M esolithic a nd N eolithic S tone T ool A ssemblages f rom S outhern F rance , A ppli c ation t o N SF -F rance E xchange P rogram.
1 985
U se-Wear A nalysis o f F laked Stone T ools, o f A rizona P ress,
2 57
T ucson.
U niversity
W endorf, F ., R . S child,
" Use o f B arley i n t he Egyptian Late P aleolithic" , S cience 2 05, N o. 4 413: p p.1341-1347.
N . H adidi, A . C lose, M . K obusiewicz, H . W ieckowska, B .Issawi, &H . H aas 1 979 W hite, J .P., D . T homas 1 972
W hitehouse, 1 971
&
H ighlands" , D . C lark , e d . , M ethuen , L ondon , p p.275-308. R .
M odels i n A rchaeology ,
" The L ast H unter-gatherers i n S outhern I taly" , A rchaeology, V ol. 2 , N o. 3 , F eb : p p.239-254.
1 978
W orld
" Italian P rehistory , C arbon 1 4 a nd t he T ree-Ring C alibration" , i n P apers i n I talian A rchaeology , I : T he L ancaster S eminar , B .A .R . S upplementary S eries 4 1(1), H . B lake, Porter a nd Whitehouse, e ds., p p. 7 1-92.
Whittle , 1 985
A .
N eolithic E urope : A S urvey , P ress, C ambridge.
Wiessner, P .
W ilmsen , 1 968
C ambridge
U niversity
" A F unctional E stimator o f P opulation f rom F loor A rea", American Antiquity, 3 9(2): p p.343-350.
1 974 E ,
' Functional A nalysis o f F laked S tone A rtifacts" , American Antiquity, 3 3: p p.156-161.
1 974
L indenmeier, A P leistocene H unting S ociety , N ew Y ork H arper & R ow.
W irtschafter , 1 942 W obst, 1 974
M .
Wylie,
H .
y 'Edynak ; 1 978a
Z .
M inerals i n N utrition , N ew Y ork.
R einhold P ublishing C ompany ,
" Boundary C onditions f or P aleolithic S ocial S ystems: A S imulation A pproach" , American Antiquity, 3 9(2): p. 1 47-178 p " Tool Microwear a nd
F unctional Types
C ave, U tah", T ebiwa 1 7,
1 975
1 978b
" What M ean T hese S tones? E thnotaxanomic Models a nd Archaeological I nterpretations i n t he N ew G uinea
G .
" Population R eplacement
2 :
f rom Hogup
p.1-32. p
o r B iological
A daptation i n
t he T ransition f rom H unting a nd G athering t o F arming i n P ost-pleistocene Y ugoslavia" . R esearch p roposal s ubmitted t o t he N ational S cience F oundation. " Culture ,
D iet,
a nd D ental
R eduction i n
F orager-Fishers o f Y ugoslavia" , V ol. 1 9, N o. 3 : p p.616-618.
2 58
M esolithic
C urrent A nthropology
y 'Edynak, G ., S . F leisch 1 983
Y oung,
D .,
&
&
1 Microevolution a nd B iological A daptability i n t he T ransition f rom F ood-collecting t o F ood-producing i n. t he I ron G ates o f Y ugoslavia". J ournal _ o f H uman Evolution, 1 2, p p.273-296. " Cognition, B ehavior, a nd M aterial C ulture" i n S tone T ool A nalysis E ssays i n H onor o f D on E . C rabtree, M .
R . B onnichsen 1 985
P lew, J . W oods a nd M . P avesic, N ew M exico P ress, A lbuquerque.
Z ivanovic, S . 1 973-1974
U niversity o f
" Prvo S aop kenje o R ezultatima A ntropolo nog P rouC 'av anja s keletnih o stataka s a P adine U D jerdapu"(First R eport o f t he R esults o f t he A nthropological S tudy o f t he S keletal R emains f rom P adina i n t he D jerdap). S tarinar N .S. V ol. X XIV-XXV, B eograd, p p. 1 39-153.
1 975
" Mesolithic P opulation i n D jerdap R egion", V I,
1 979
1 -7;
B alcanica
B eograd.
" Further E vidence o n C ro-Magnon M an i n t he I ron G ate G orge o f t he D anube", C urrent A nthropology, 2 0, N o. 4 :
Z velebil,
e ds.,
M .,
&
P . R owley-Conwy 1 984
p .805.
'Transition t o F arming i n N orthern E urope: G atherer P erspective", R eview, 1 7(2), p p.104-128.
2 59
A H unter-
N orwegian A rchaeological