An unauthorized account of the secret power behind theWashington Post, and the woman who took down President Nixon. In
308 42 27MB
English Pages 320 [306] Year 2018
Davis
,
G7596d 20G5724
Katharine th^ Great
PUBLIC LIBRARY Fort Wayne and Allen County, Indiana
sro
LLUIirillWllilliiriffiSLIC
JAN
4
*80 ^
^^^ ^a
y
\
*
u>;
LIBRARY
'
3 18S3''S(55'57§7
B G7596d
Davis, Deborah Katharine the Great
Ki
I For
KATHARINE THE GREAT On June
17,
1972, five
men were arrested
for a burglary at the
Democratic National Headquarters in the Watergate complex in Washington, D.C. From this event grew the major political scandal of our times, a scandal that might have gone undiscovered and unreported except for the WASHINGTON POST, published by Katharine
Graham. Although she powerful
is
surely one of the most
women in the United States, few
Americans are aware of her far-reaching influence.
the
first
KATHARIITE THE GREAT
is
full-len^h biography of Kath-
arine, a woman born into wealth and power. The second daughter of multi-
millionaire Eugene Meyer and Agnes Ernst, she grew up among the rich and the elite; her mother's friends included Brancusi, Rodin, and Thomas Mann.
Katharine was sent to Vassar and then to the University of Chicago; after a brief stay on the West Coast she returned to the East, where her father had just purchased the washincon post. When Katharine married, her husband, the brilliant, mercurial Philip Graham, be-
came publisher. I
Katharine then settled down to two decades of housewifery while Philip ran the POST. But by the early 1960s Phil was battling manic depi-ession; the marriage to sputter- Phil had to stop work-
began
ing full-time. In August 1963, on the anniversary of the formation of the Washington Post Company, he put a fifth
shotgun to his head. Katharine hei'self took over the
post.
Middle-aged, inexperienced, the owner's
daughter, she had to fight for respect, for control of the '>aper. She won; together with Ben Brr.Jlee, she made the post a successful paper. And an important one; in 1970, she published the Pentagon Papers to international repercussions. Then came 1972, the year of Uixon's reelection and the- Watergate break-iTL The WASHINGTON post's investigation of this ofcc^r-y, the insistent probing of the reports ers Woodward and Bernstein, not only uncovered the actual significance of the event but itself became a news-making story. But what was the motivation behind this intensive coverage? Freedom of the press? Journalistic integrity? Or other motives? Through an
analysis of "mediapolitics"— the inseparable relationship between the media and the government— Deborah Davis provides a new perspective on why
Watergate was perpetrated and, above all, why Katharine Graham's post reported the stories as it did For, at this time, everything that Katharine Graham did, she did through the post, and it affected every American in the 1970s.
From the M