Articles, speeches, letters and correspondence by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels on Ireland.
774 120 38MB
English Pages 518 [659] Year 1978
Workers
of
All
Countries,
Unite!
MARX ENGELS Ireland
and Irish
the Question
PUBLISHERS’
The M.A.
text
Russian
publication
by
was
collection and
L.I.Golman
V.E.
prepared
Kunina,
for
assisted
by
Zhelnova. Translated
from
Italian
by
B.
The Ireland”’ Songs”
History
Ireland,
of
“Notes
have
by
and
S.Ryazanskaya
K.
Cook,
to
a
been by
R.
translated
and
from
the
Ha
VU
Third
10101- 082 os ES g_ 016001) 792778
Angela
u
®.
the
History
Collection
of
of
Irish
Clifford.
Juresbe
UVPHAHIICKOM
aqH2AauucKOM
Second
the
by
Mapkc
First
in
Preface
Dixon.
HPJIAHTUH
Printed
for
‘“‘Notes
the
for
K. OB
French
Bean.
and
Edited
by
German
the
from
V.Schneierson,
M9
this
of
NOTE
Union
printing printing printing
of
Soviet
BOTIPOCE
AZbIKEe
1971 1974 1978
Socialist
Republics
0101010 01010000
CONTENTS
t
re) ko) a6 Ce
17
KARL
MARX
AND
IRELAND
AND
LETTERS
FROM
THE
ccc
......c0
Introduction
eee
c cere
FREDERICK
THE
IRISH
Frederick
eee
Engels
0...
From
the
Chapter
“The
Great
From
the
Chapter
“The
Agricultural
[THE
By
FEARGUS Engels
BILL
Frederick
ee
hw
IN
THE
The
INDIAN
From
TRADE From
LORD
47
Karl
et
te
et
Karl
TENANT OF
PALMERSTON. By
OF
Karl
0...
55
Frederick wwe tee
58
......... ..........
22,
February
eee
MAZZINI— IN
61 62
OF
63
THE ENG-
ceceeee
64
......
69
RIGHT.
By
Karl
Marx
GOVERNMENT—CABS—
QUESTION.
QUESTION—BRITISH DOINGS
.
et
BRIBERY
Marx...
54
ee
DUCHESS
Marx AND
ee
te
Engels
49
CHART-
By
PEOPLE.
QUESTION.
By
FAILURE RUSSIAN
RETURNS—
THE
eee
CLOUDS—THE
QUESTION-—IRISH
WAR
AND
Frederick
SLAVERY.
By
ENGLAND—THE Frederick Engels
cee
QUESTION—ELECTION
FINANCIAL
THE
..............06.-
By
EMIGRATION—KOSSUTH
IRELAND—THE From
By
DANGER.
COBDEN.
eee
ee
ELECTIONS—FINANCIAL
LAND—Mr.
...........
47
IN
IRISH ee
POLISH
From
FORCED
0.
43
ene
oo
COLOGNE
AND
99
ENGLAND.By
Proletariat”
1...
From
SUTHERLAND
IN
eee
IRELAND
FOR
AND THE we ee we
O’CONNOR Se
REFUGEE
Towns”
Engels
From [THE SPEECH ON 1848]. By Karl Marx
From
cee
COMMERCIAL CRISIS MOVEMENT-IRELAND].
COERCION
ISTS].
sesee
.........4..
Engels
WORKING-CLASS
ccc
Frederick
From [THE CHARTIST
seen
ENGELS
By
THE
OF
reece
cette
QUESTION
LONDON.
CONDITION
reer
By
Karl
By
76
AND
POPULATION
PARLIAMENT. Marx
Marx
Karl
Marx
.........-..2++4+
77 80
10
_
CONTENTS
From
{THE
BLUE
FEBRUARY
Parliament]
From
LORD
ENGELS From
THE From
POPULATION,
From
THE
From
ENGLISH
From
Chapter
IN
of
the
of
FENIAN
of
{NOTES
Karl
.
2...
OF
A
FOR
Marx
{OUTLINE
AN
ee
cw
cc
REPORT
ee
we ON
LONDON.
HI.
Karl
By
we
Karl
Marx
Marx
AND
we ee
SPEECH
THE
we
te
IRISH
16,
87 89
93
Marx
96
eee
ee
ee
QUESTION
TO
OF
1867}.
By
ON
FROM
IRELAND
Karl
109 127
By
THE
Marx
LETTERS
128
ete
........
....... .....
130
.
136
150
BETWEEN
1867
MARX
TO
LUDWIG
KUGELMANN.
MARX
TO
ENGELS.
November
2,
1867
....-..020 022 c cee
153
MARX.
November
5,
1867
«1... ce eescveees
154
ENGELS.
November
7,
1867
«2...
ENGELS MARX
TO TO
AND
1868
107
By
GERMAN
WRITTEN
105
THE
[RECORD OF A SPEECH ON THE IRISH QUESTION DELIVERED BY KARL MARX TO THE GERMAN WORKERS, EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION IN LONDON ON DECEMBER 16,1867] ccc cece cece ett eee EXCERPTS
102
wee
te
te
97
5.
IRELAND].
ON
wee
ASSOCIATION
December
84
Marx
ASSOCIATION.
et
ewww
EDUCATIONAL
IN
By
MEN’S
we
we
Marx
Karl
Karl
MANCHESTER
UNDELIVERED
2...
COMMUNIST
WORKERS
ee
Karl
Vol.
AT
82
eee
1. By Karl Marx Section Capitalist Accumulation
WORKING
2-0
By
By
Vol.
of
CAPITAL,
PRISONERS
INTERNATIONAL
OF
............ ............. . .. . .
Marx
AMERICA.
Law
ee
ISLANDS.
Karl
By
CAPITAL,
General
ce
PAUPERISM.
AND
HUMANISM
XXV
By
ccc
0.
IONIAN
ENGLAND.
..
..............
Marx
2...
AND
Marx
...........006.
Marx
Karl
IRELAND.
XXXVII
Marx
By
1856
CRIME
CRISIS
Illustrations
Karl
Karl
THE
OF
IN
EXCITEMENT
THE
By
23,
May
QUESTION
Chapter
Marx
RUSSELL.
MARX.
Karl
......0 0000 cee eeee
Karl
[Excerpt].
JOHN
TO
THE
From
By
DEBATES
BRIGADE ]. By
IRISH
REVENGE.
IRELAND’S
{From
BOOKS—PARLIAMENTARY
6...—THE
October
1867
cee
2.2
8,
November
ENGELS
TO
LUDWIG
ENGELS
TO
MARX.
November
24,
1867...
2.
ce
ENGELS
TO
MARK.
November
29,
1867...
0.
2
ENGELS.
November
30,
1867
MARX
TO
KUGELMANN.
11,
2...
0
cc
www
1867
eee eee ee
ccaae
153
154
155
ewe
eee
155
eee
eee
155
ew ew
we
156
CONTENTS
MARX
TO
ENGELS
ENGELS.
MARK.
TO
1867
December
19,
1867...
16,
1868
ENGELS.
March
MARX
TO
LUDWIG
KUGELMANN.
THE
THE
DEBATE
General
By
THE
POLICY
RESPECT
THE POLICY RESPECT TO
{ON
Support of the
30,
By
and
1869).
[IRELAND
THE
{ON
From
CONFIDENTIAL
THE
ENGLISH
By
ERS.
HISTORY
Conditions
Ancient
Ireland
OF
THE
Draft
Plan...
Notes
for
the
Notes
on
Varia
on
THE
..........
Council
By
Marx
FENIAN
ee
SPEECH
we
ewe
the
of
ee
THE
General
..........00.-
263
cece ee eer eee tenes
263
cee eee eer rerenveerenes
283
Engels
MATERIAL
te
of Ireland
0...
Ireland... Smith’s
History
of
.
Book the
te
eee
ee
te
1...
eee
2.
/rish Irish
THE
FOR
1...
Engels...
ee
256
262
Frederick
Frederick
252
.........-...-002..
26,1870)]
By
251
PRISON
ewe
CONCERNING
Minutes
169
(Record
Council Meet-.e0--
Karl
167
THE
...... . .
THE
the
TO
QUESTION
ee
162
WITH of the
.......
Marx
the General Marx
AND
161
Speech
General
Karl
IRISH
2...
History
the
9,
Resolution. From of November 23
Council Meetings
0.02.
Goldwin
the
........ .........
By
of
the
of
WITH
the
of
REVOLUTION
(From
April
2...
Chronology
160
of
November
Marx
Notes].’By
cc
PREPARATORY
IRELAND.
159
2.0.0... cc eee e eee ewes
MARX’S
of
Natural
From
oo
IRELAND.
OF
the
of
Karl
General Council
OF
NEWSPAPER
Meeting
Council
By
the Minutes of 1869)]. By Karl
KARL
OF
BEE-HIVE
and
(Record
COMMUNICATION.
Marx
Minutes
GOVERNMENT
Minutes
GOVERNMENT
Karl
fRECORD
the
and
SIGNIFICANCE
eee
ee
AMERICAN
Extracts
of the Speech. From ing of December 14,
26
October
Marx
THE
1801.
OF
(Record the
ce
1869)].
of the General
159
TAKE
TO
THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT IRISH PRISONERS (Record
Karl
FROM
UNION
From
OF THE
Speeches in the Minutes
PRESS
PRISONERS
16,
November
of
ee eee
ence
1868
From
BRITISH
IRISH
Resolution.
Draft
Meeting
of
THE
OF
THE
TO
0c
QUESTION
Letter.
1...
Marx
eee
159
SYMPATHY WITH IRELAND AND ON THE OPENING OF
IRISH
Meetings
Karl
6,
ENGLISH
the
of
Content
Council
1869)].
and
THE
THE
ON
and
Speech
[ON
BY
REFUSAL
ccc
0...
April
OF THE GROWTH OF ENGLISH WORKERS
NOTICE AMONG
0.0... eee wees
14,
TO
[ON
. ....... ..........
December
MARX
11
tee
eee
0.00
ee
History
HISTORY
wee
ce and
eens te es
303
eee
303
eee
306
Character.
356
eh
eee
eee Irish
ee
Confiscations..........
303
372
12
CONTENTS
NOTES
By
EXCERPTS ON
THE
FOR
SONGS.
FROM
IRELAND
A
TO
0...
Engels
COLLECTION
MARX
ENGELS.
1872
AND
1,
March
1869
2...
27,
1869
MARX.
September
ENGELS
TO
MARX.
October
ENGELS
TO
MARX.
November
1,
1869
ENGELS.
November
6,
1869
MARX.
November
17,
1869.....
ENGELS.
November
18,
1869...
MARX.
November
19,
1869
ENGELS.
November
26,
1869
MARX.
November
29,
1869
MARX
TO TO
ENGELS
MARX
TO TO
ENGELS
TO
24,
1869
MARX
TO
LUDWIG
KUGELMANN.
MARX
TO
ENGELS.
December
4,
1869
MARX.
December
9,
1869...
ENGELS
TO
ccc
0...
TO
ENGELS
ee
. ........ ...... ........ ....... ...... ..
ENGELS
TO
IRISH
«2.0...
ce
eee
386
0...
cc eee
387
00002
cee
0.0.00
0.0.0...
2...
00
.........0
ee
ee eee
TO
ENGELS.
December
10,
1869
MARX
TO
ENGELS.
December
17,
1869
ce
cee
0...
eww
ww
we
ee
397
ee
ee
January
19,
1870
2...
ENGELS
TO
MARX.
January
25,
1870
2.2... ce
ENGELS
TO
MARX.
February
17,
1870
2.0
ccc
19,1870
1...
2...
February
MARX
TO
ENGELS.
March
MARX
TO
PAUL TO
AND
5,
1870
LAURA
March
7,
1870
19,
1870
MARX
TO
ENGELS.
March
MARX
TO
SIGFRID
MEYER
MARX
TO
ENGELS.
April
14,
1870...
15,
1870
TO
MARX.
April
ENGELS
TO
MARX.
May
KARL L870
MARX
2.
TO
JENNY
15,
March
AND
2...
0 (HIS
ee
eee
400
eee
401
eee
402
..
ee 9,
ee
404
eee
405
1870
406
DAUGHTER).
ee
wees
0c
ee ee
ee
May
404
ene
ce ee ee ee
399
401
ee
April
399
en
1870
ce
VOGT.
0
2...
1870... MARX
0.
AUGUST
0.0
5,
ccc
2.0...
ee
ce
1.0...
LAFARGUE.
MARX.
ENGELS
.
ee
395
eee
MARX.
ENGELS.
393
396
TO
TO
39]
vves
ENGELS
MARX
389
392
0... 2 cc cee ee 2...
388
cence
1869
0...
388
391
....0...0 0.0.0 eens 0...
387
000220?
0.0.
29,
wee
8
ee
6
0000
November
385
cee
......0.00..0
MARX
ENGELS
383
LETTERS
1869
MARX
OF
cc
0...
WRITTEN
BETWEEN TO
PREFACE
Frederick
410 413 413
31, 414
13
CONTENTS
MARX
TO
ENGELS
FRIEDRICH
TO
[POSITION
SIGISMUND
Speech
of
By
Marx...
22,
wc
at
1871,
ce
BETWEEN
we THE
From
THE
REPORT
FIFTH
WORKING By
Karl
MEN’S
ce By
LETTERS
FROM
From
THE
INTERNATIONAL.
From
THE
ENGLISH
From
DIALECTICS
From
ANTI-DUHRING.
From THE Frederick
LONDON.
OF
By
cc
NEE
EXCERPTS
FROM
J.R. Karl MARX.
MARX
TO
ENGELS.
MARX
TO
JOHN
SWINTON.
TO
JENNY
ENGELS
TO
EDUARD
MARX
TO
ENGELS MARX
JENNY TO
TO
1,
ee
Engels...
Engels
eee
LAND
ee
eee
ne
QUESTION.
By
Frederick
22.
November
4,
BERNSTEIN.
LONGUET.
April
cc ee 1880
12,
March
11,
1881
April 29,
THE
eee
ee
24,1881
February
April
OF
ene
Engels
1882
BERNSTEIN.
LONGUET.
........ ............ ......... ........ ............. .........
GREEN’S HISTORY Marx... 0... cece
1881
14,1881
1881
«2...
421
423 426 427 430
431
By
ANTI-DUHRING.
ee
1877...
LONGUET.
EDUARD
JENNY
AND
August
ENGELS
HAGUE.
weer
Engels
LETTERS
ON THE IRISH QUESTION WRITTEN BETWEEN 1877
ee
GERMAN WORKING MEN'S 0.0... ce cece ewe eee
By
418
THE
.......--005065
TO
THE
THE
TO
Frederick
Frederick
ce
.
..... . . ....... ....... .......
417
Report
cece we wee ew cee
From BISMARCK AND THE PARTY. By Fredertch Engels
LONGUET,
By
Engels
ec
eens
AND
of His
THE
re
Frederick
NOTES
AND
FOOD 2...
From SYNOPSIS OF ENGLISH PEOPLE. By
By
Frederick
PREPARATORY Engels 6... 0c
From AMERICAN Frederick Engels
JENNY
By
NATURE.
AT
ee Engels
[Excerpt.]
we
INTERNATIONAL
ee
Fredertck
ELECTIONS.
Conterence)}.
tee
COUNCIL
HELD
ee
415
the
1872)}
THE
OF
ASSOCIATION
wc
14,
GENERAL
CONGRESS
Marx...
Record
414
MEN’S (From
SECTIONS
May
of
ee
tt
(Engels’s
THE
OF
ANNUAL
London
et
IRISH
BRITISH FEDERAL COUNCIL. at the General Council Meeting
1872
March
of
ENGLAND
the
te
1871
WORKING
AND
GERMANY
September
[RELATIONS
Beginning
INTERNATIONAL
IN
29,
November
SORGE.
BORKHEIM.
THE
OF
ASSOCIATION
Karl
ADOLF
..5000..
432
433
135
437 440
442 442 443 446 447 447 448
14
CONTENTS
MARX
TO
JENNY
MARX
TO
ENGELS.
...... .......... .......... ......... .. .. 7,
December
LONGUET.
5,
January
1882
3,
450
ENGELS
TO
EDUARD
BERNSTEIN.
May
ENGELS
TO
EDUARD
BERNSTEIN.
June
ENGELS
TO
EDUARD
BERNSTEIN.
August
THE
ORIGIN
THE
THE
OF
STATE.
By
1882
26,
FAMILY,
Frederick
1882
9,
1882
PRIVATE
From AN INTERVIEW WITH ENGELS PUBLISHED IN THE NEW YORKER VOLKSZEITUNG ........02 cece eeuee From
THE
PREFACE
CONDITION
Frederick
From
Engels
THE
By
PEASANT
Frederick
EXCERPTS ON
BY
AND
OF
THE
FROM
2...
ccc
ccc
ee IN
QUESTION
cc
0...
EDITION
IN
ee
ee
ee
tte
460
By
tee
AND
GERMANY.
te
ee
ee
456
THE
OF
ENGLAND.
ee
FRANCE
eee
454
wees
461
463
LETTERS
WRITTEN
QUESTION
FREDERICK
ENGLISH
WORKING-CLASS
Engels
[RISH
THE
TO
THE
451
PROPERTY
0.60.00. cee eee
Engels...
449 449
KARL
AND
February
nee
448
7, 1882
TO
From
eee eee
0.2
ENGELS
KAUTSKY.
1881...........
1885
BETWEEN
ENGELS
1894 1,
TO
WILHELM
December
TO
JOHANN
TO
EDUARD
TO
FRIEDRICH
ADOLF
TO
FLORENCE
KELLY-WISCHNEWETZKY.
TO
WILHELM
TO
FRIEDRICH
TO
AUGUST
BEBEL
TO
NIKOLAI
FRANTSEVICH
TO
FRIEDRICH
ADOLF
SORGE.
February
TO
FRIEDRICH
ADOLF
SORGE.
August
TO
FRAU
TO
HERMANN
TO
NIKOLAI
TO
AUGUST
BEBEL.
July
7,
1892
TO
AUGUST
BEBEL
January
24,
TO
FRIEDRICH
LIEBKNECHT.
PHILIPP
ADOLF
SORGE.
23,
FRANTSEVICH
1887
29,
December
1890.1...
11,
1888
22,
1888
7, 1889
June
cee
10,
wee
nee
1890
465 466 466 467 467 468 468 468 469
11,1891
470
1891
470
2,
1891
2.1... 0c cueuee
471
30,
1892
1... 0. eee wees
47]
DANIELSON.
SORGE.
February
2...
DANIELSON.
March
SCHLUTER.
1885
........... ......... ........... ........... ......... . . ........ .......... ..
.........-2.0005.
18,
February
December
LIEBKNECHT.
1886
June
SORGE.
January
ADOLF
22,
May
LIEBKNECHT.
5,
December
BECKER.
BERNSTEIN.
1885
0...
ce
June
eee
18,
1892
ec
ee
eee
472 472
1893.0... ce ee eee eee
473
November 10, 1894........
473
15
CONTENTS
SUPPLEMENT
THE
IRISH
THE
STATE
ADDRESS
OF
..
THE
IRELAND
BY
ARTICLES
... ..
A ND
J (0 )1 I nd e x
F irs t
page
18 70
M arx ’ s
... f or
p lan 2
of
ee
ew tee
AND
ees
tee
QUESTION
COUNCIL
THE
OF
14 t h
cee
1872 25
MA RX
18 91
ees
ues
NG -A V ELI
6c
0
496
Terror
t ree
00 c 2eee
2
ELEA N O R
J anuar y
rec e
reser
490
INTER-
Police
ASSOCIATION.
ee
523
5 26
TO
ees
533
537
ccc
cc c
ce
cee
cee
eee
w een
O NS I LLUS T RA T I
D ra f t
..... . THE
TO
BRITAIN
IRISH
485
I NDEX E S
2
In d e x
ec
THE
477
FRIENDS
LEAGUE
GREAF
c e eee
A ND
GO M PER S
S A M UEL
AND
. . . . . . , ... MEN’S
May
T HO RNE
WI LLI AM
OF
GENERAL
2
M EET I NG
............
MEMBERS 19, 1867
.
AND
GREY
ASSOCIATION
LABOUR
ON
...... . . . , THE
GEORGE
MEN’S
ee
MARX
WORKING
I re lan d
C O UN C I L
AND
WOMEN
cee
BY
NATIONAL
S ub j ec t
AND
JENNY
DECLARATION
NO T ES
LAND
MEN
WORKING
i sm in
SIR
WORKING
OF THE COUNCIL AND ASSOCIATION. November
MEETING OF THE
N a me
PRISONERS.
INTERNATIONAL
t h e His t ory M ar x ’ s
ec
.......
le t t er
et
d a ught er J enny
I re lan d
of
to
ee
Pa ul
ee
e ee
ee
ee
ee eee
errr e t ree
eee
ener
eens
620
eenene
660
. .. , , eee
1
an d L a ura et ee ee
--0 -
ee
ee e
eee
renee ees
eee
L a f argue
eee
cere
M arc h
3 11
5
eee
e te
4 11
rec
ecees
OO
FOREWORD
are
There volume
the
of
welcomed.
It
was
struggle
the
reasons
writings is
timely has
since been
area, to
which
Marx
faced
ally
and
Engels
those
reader
that
still lie
this
of
from that guide-lines
book
and
the the
publication
on
Engels
myth
that
partition
brought
it
and
solved
before
us
who
has
the
still
is
knowledge
will
freed
himself
totally
of
the day
essenti-
apparent
be
held
their
are
which
today
it
m
That
problems
limitation. Consequently which, mutatis mutandis,
national
position
about.
be
‘Northern
1921,
of
is to
Insh in
one
in
Ireland
events
by
present tangled those who lack
The
incomprehensible events
historical
the
exploded
since
Union.
why
Marx
of
over
the
Ireland’’,
within
many
to
any
even
modestly
provides have high
numerous relevance
today. It
give in
should
the the
Irish
founders
they
what
has
English ism (in her
question, it.
best
radicals
have
surrounding struggles
resemble
them
find
it
content
so
hard
as
with
that
how
it, and
the
sheer
should
of
it should
fresh
interest
seriously
the
volume
of
the
in
them
on
in
their
blindest
their all
struggle
Irish
own
to
sides,
Perhaps
contrast that
help
the
of
tended,
believe
First
a
restore vision in spots of the England has centuries of imperialbehind her. Consequently most of it
one
reaction.
much,
to
see
And
become
labour movement. the broad sense)
National
Same
regarded
to
they
when
to
devoted tended
chauvinism
they
of
Marxism
of
work
two valuable functions. England and the world,
perform
Marxists,
since
to peoples
identify
Irish
class,
has
the all
people
further
nationalism ruling
against
afield,
not
which
the they
18
FOREWORD
have rejected. Wisdom begins tional recognition of the right
own
mine
its
that
the
England
it
in Marxism, represent as
of
this
nation tion
who
book
been
guarded At
out
in
turn
the
a
on
within
the
a
of
time
Fox
except
fifties
The
a
not the
of
but
copies
in
But collec-
some
thirties,
few
in
Ireland
read.
the
a
for
and
politics,
contained in
masses
libraries.
after
would
to
tried
craftsmen
defended
thirsts
people
the
forties
in public
influence
print,
century
the
of
man
it has
zealously
great
the taught
Irish
himself
Marxist
James
German,
spread
the Letters to Kugelmann. Connolly’s life the revival and application of Marx’s teach-
He
the
the
of
had
national
become
independence
aware
Democratic
Social
this
of
was
still
alive
development
of
the
world
struggle
teaching
Federation
Engels
when
theoretical
who
of
primacy
Ireland.
member
Marx
few
Ralph
some
working
knowledge was indeed
work
old
that
know,
late
of
many
available
Irish
have
were
the
of
Dublin.
Connolly,
some
the
classes that
freedom
would
the
Not of
class
in practice.
them. days
well
been
working of
ruling
to
dark
knew has
exercised
long
the
national
by
and
interest
it. There
in
Many
made
letters
ing
even
the
alien
the
to operate
begins
present
the
believed
seeking
economics.
at
which
The
between
arouse
something
parts, century,
Capital.
Ireland
of
should
altogether
country
interest
of
tnat
and
Second,
have
frank, total and uncondithe Irish nation to deterdestiny, and it 1s from that point
International
identity
in of
and
in
a
while
Edinburgh,
influencing
the
move-
proletarian
ment.
The
to compact tion be
extension Ireland but
lightly
importation.
ist-oriented ists.
The
of
is
the International Workingmen’s Associareferred to m Dr. Golman’s admirably
comprehensive
assumed, There
groups
however,
were in
attempts
of
a
introduction. that
number
Ireland
during
O’Connell’s
arose
it of
left
the
must
It
a
from
radical
times
followers
not foreign
and
social-
of
the
Chart-
to
extinguish
Chartism in Drogheda received attention in the Northern Star. It is surely no accident that Feargus O’Connor, who became the leader of Chartism in England during one of its most virile periods, was the nephew of Arthur O’Connor, the
United
Irishman,
and
that
he
chose
for
the
name
of
his
paper
19
FOREWORD
the
name
given
by
the
United
Irishmen
own paper
to their
in
Belfast.
The of
deepest
most
and
Republicanism,
It
Fenians.
best
As
tradition
in
expressed
in
orginated
Revolution.
abiding
response
wrote:
“In
a test
day
to
a
by
the
little
every
is that
Ireland
Marx’s
Imish
the
Tone
Wolfe
in
the
French time
the
man’s
political into two great creed, and the nation was fairly divided parties, the Aristocrats and the Democrats.... It is needless. I believe, to say I was a Democrat from the beginning.” In his centenary book The Internationale Mr. R. Palme Dutt remarks that “The international communist movement developed in direct line of descent from the left wing of the democratic revolution and the first beginnings of the working-class movement’’. He quotes Marx in 1848: “The Jacobin of 1793 has become the Communist of today.” Because of political movements of the their common origins in the nineteenth century, oppressed classes of Europe in the early French
Revolution
Republicanism,
became
pragmatic
of
rather
than
con-
but
scientific,
a constant receptivity to said that Stephens, the Young Ireland revolutionary forced to flee to Paris after the failure of the rising of 1848, had contact with revolutionary socialist groups, before returning to Ireland (after a stay in America) Fenian John Devoy, while to found Fenianism. The great sistently
revolutionary,
socialist
ideas.
scarcely
describable
First
showed
Thus
it
as
International.
is
a
Why
worked
Marxist, then
did
the
closely
United
with
Irishman
the of
1798 not become the Communist of 1848? The full answer of this book must must await a study that the publication surely stimulate, namely, the analysis of ideological developments in the Irish national movement during the nineteenth century. But a decisive factor must surely have been the diaspora
following
over
revolutionaries
was
English
revolution The tracted Pearse Connolly
the the
face
imperialism’s
and
against
radical towards and
wing the
1916.
of
the
the
forces
The
safeguard
Republicanism working revolutionary
were
Irish
emigrant
ship
alike
against
ideas.
of
Similar
of
scattering
earth.
strongest
revolutionary
MacDermott
in
and
“famine”
drawn
came
was
into
constantly
class.
an
together
Thus
Clarke,
alliance in
at-
with 1921-22.
20
, , , ,. ,
FOREWORD
, . , . , , , . . , , , , . . ., . , , ., , , , . . , . ..
a c onf u se d and f ear f ul L a b o u r t o ac cep t part it ion w hic h Llo y d G eorge ha d f orce d o n I re la nd a t t h e po int o f t he g un T he i can R ep u b l part y S inn F e in sp lit A mong t hose w ho op po se d t h e mons t ro u s se tt lemen t w ere lea d ers s uc h as Lia m Me l l ow s s t rong ly inf luence d b y C onno lly ’ s t ea c hings an d M arx i s t s w it hin t h e R ep u b lic a n mo v em en t s uc h as Pea d ar l O ’ D onne l O ut s i de t h e R ep u b lic a n rank s t h e only par t y t o s t P art y o f oppose t h e T rea t y w as t he y o ung C omm uni I re la nd le d b y J a mes C onno lly ’ s son and a num b e r o f it s mem b ers t oo k par t in t he f ig ht ing t ha t ens u e d In t he t w en t ie s and t hir t ies t h e R ep u b li c a n ne w sp a per A n Ph o b la c h t reg u lar ly ca rrie d art ic le s b y in t ema t iona lly k no w n M arx is t s It m a y t here f ore b e sa id and t he Iris h rea d er o f t his b oo k c a n f f rom j ud ge f or himse l his o w n e x perience t h a t s o litt le is backed prepa re d
b o u rgeo i s ie T he lea d ers hip was
by
-
a lien t o t he Ir is h t ra dit ion t ha t reac t ionary ruling c lasses ac t ua l or prospec t iv e ha v e a lw a y s so ug ht spec ia l mea ns f or ins u la t ing t he peop le f rom it s inf luence T here w as perh aps ins t inc t iv e recognit ion o f t his f ac t in E nge ls ’ s env io us c r y w hen O ’ C o nne ll w as para d ing Ire land w it h t w o h un d re d t h o u sa n d f o llo w ers a b o ut him “ ‘ G iv e me ” ’ (s ure ly t h is emp ha s is is imp lie d ) “ t w o h un d re d t h o u s a n d I r is hmen and I co uld o v e r t h ro w t he ent ire B rit is h mona r c hy ” E nge ls ’ s f a v o ur it e reso rt w as t he hom e o f t h e B u rns f a m ily w ho ha d F en ia n c onnec t ions A f t er t h e d ea t h o f h is cons t a nt c om pa n io n M a r y B urns in 1863 h er s is t e r Liz z ie b ec a me his sec on d w if e and a c c om pa nie d him on his v is it t o I re lan d in 1869 T h e f a sc ina t ion w hic h t he c o un t ry he ld f or hi m w as e x presse d in his d esc r ip t ion o f t he Irs h c lima t e : M ar x ism
-
-
w ea t her lik e t h e i nh a bit ant s ha s a more ac ut e c harac t er 1t m o v es in s harper more s u d d en cont ras t s ; t he s k y 1s lik e a n Ir is h w oma n’ s f a ce : here a lso ra in a nd s uns hine s u cc ee d ea c h o t h er s u d d enly an d u ne x p ec t e d ly an d t here is none o f t h e gre y Eng lis h b ore d om ” ’ T here is a researc h s ubj ec t f or some y o u ng his t orian in t he d e t a ils o f E nge ls ’ s c onnec t ions w it h Ire land and t h e F enia ns o f L ancas hire I nd ee d t h e p ub lica t ion o f t his co llec t ion prepa re d b y D r ‘ T he
Go l m an
an d
Dr
V a leria
K u n ina
m ig h t
w e ll sp u r
m uc h
researc h in Ir is h a nd E ng lis h po lit ica l a nd e c onom ic his t o r y a t e d a s pec ia l v ar iant o f t he un iv ersa l la w o f T ha t M a r x pos t ul
21
FO REW O RD
capitalist
accumulation
even
appreciated generally
in
goods
England.
It
has
where
that
such
economic
followed
the
would
be
very little it still appears to be categories as prices of
Ireland
Ireland,
accepted
capital
in
same
been
pattern
in
to expand
interesting
as
in
analysis
of
Ireland
Marx’s
the eighteen sixties, in Capital, to cover a longer period and to collate the data throughout the whole field of Irish economic life. It would also not be impossible to find evid-
ence by
that
the
Marx
special
mode
over
a
and
Engels
capital
of
years
hundred
ago
accumulation is
discerned
no means
by
defunct
today. Marx and
systematise
a state
suitable
despite
look,
the
it
Engels’s is
their
had
existence
to
“gleaned
be there
are
views
to
going
not
be
no
is
the
thorny. help to
Viewed as dogma solve them. But
dogma.
Viewed genius,
proached this
and
book
equipment Ireland,
as
and
how
great
the
to
their
Dr.
a
of
and
Irish
history
notes Marx’s
and
thought.
And
compilation.
The
ordered
handwritten
on
subject value
in
out, outand
completely
from
arrange
points
Golman
which
of
further
of
this
internally, and in her relations the world, are complex and
Marx’s or Engels’s their writings were
examples
of
revealing
the
out
the
writings will not not intended as
analytical
way
methods
problems
and
solved,
were
C.
Liverpool,
the
Desmond
September
a
of
ap-
contents most important contribution to Labour and Republican movements progressive counterparts in Britain.
thought
a
make of
As
to
opportunity
Ireland
provocative
problems oi Ireland today, with England, Europe and
scientific
on
publication.
for
But
the
ideas
obvious
has
fragments”.
this
all
never
of
the in
Greaves
1970
INTRODUCTION
This
is
the
of
works
Ireland in part,
and
the
to
make
Marx
and
endeavour
first
lection
Karl
of
sketches.
The
supplement
contains
er
and
documents
of
Jenny
comprehensive
synopses
of
articles
the
col-
on
Engels
and articles, whole or transcripts and outlines
Irish question—letters excerpts from bigger works, speeches and reports, a number
of
a
Frederick
by
and
rough daught-
Marx’s
international
move-
labour
ment.
This
collection
the works International
edition Engels
of Marx Russian),
the
in
the
of
C.C.
are a
documents
and
Engels
more
Works (in
of
and
on and
collected
the
and
sections
process
of
these
the
First
editions
their
more
Marxism-Lenin-
of
Moscow.*
Included
unknown
on
light and
the
in
works, views the
affording
the
letters Marx
of
a
student
heritage.
about
Ireland
preliminary However,
the Russian of
International.
than
covers. Their precis and economy are given in part only, of
of
of
First
these
deciphering.
Documents
the
previously
question
wrote
latest
and Engels, the Marxand the five-volume
Institute
additional
knowledge
Stantial
Moscow.-—Ed.
of
Irish
Engels
between
history
C.P.S.U.,
number casting
complete
Marx
*
Men’s
X
the
from
Engels and of documents Association—the second
General Council issued recently by the
collection
Irish
and
The
Minutes, of
on texts
based
of
of the Collected Archives, Vol.
edition, ism
is
Marx Working
of
summaries
this
International,
book 5
vols.,
has been notes on since
are
comprises Progress
sub-
still
in
their
Publishers,
23
INTRODUCTION
most pertinent statements on the subject at hand and resents a comprehensive picture of their views. Ireland claimed the attention of Marx and Engels from the 1840s onward. They followed the developments there, responded to them in the press, spoke on Ireland at meetings the
of
General
cussed
the
a
made tion,
close and of
wrote
it,
for
a
write
plete
his
some
while
Capital,
an
wrote
and
the
operation
poorly the
his
of
interest
in
capitalist
society,
and
they
seized
capitalist
of
land.
influence
exerted
Ireland
to
the
of
the
two
the
scientifically
the
in
and
working
socialist
the
of
The
paid
travels
of
was
masses the
reconstruction
of of
agrarian
Ireland
demon-
then
were
socialist
of
a
examine
an
in
which they of capitalist
conception and
of
afield.
sociolog-
to
opportunity
what
of
far
economists,
development
peasant
at the peasants
ranged
example
by
theorists
as
the
laws
developed
countries
concem with
who
his
of
letters
Capitalist country, England, from main data for analysing the laws
arrived
dis-
Both
political situaMarx used his
Engels,
account
Engels’s
historians,
Peasant
and
to bthers.
and
to Marx. Engels intendhistory of Ireland, gathered a store of material the opening chapters, but did not live to comin
of
ists
strated
work,
Ireland,
and
students
and
International,
other
project.
Marx’s As
main
to
1869
and
to
ed
his
visits
1856
First
to each
letters
study of Ireland’s economic and her history and social relations.
in
findings
several
in
the
of
Council
subject
the
classic
derived their production. continuous
of
revolution,
workers’
peasants’ society under the
who
alliance
involvement the
guidance
proletariat.
However, Ireland was and Engels saw her as
sion
became
lords
interlaced
descended
ploiters
of
of the tributing
sources
with
Marx
the
to the and
not
an
agrarian country. to colonial domination by a more powerful neighbour. Engels described Ireland as England’s first colony (see p. 93), whose conquest dated back to the latter half of the twelfth century. Social oppresMarx
with
from the Irish peasants.
a
land
simply subject
national
oppression,
conquerors The
plunder
since
were
the
of
Ireland
main
Lenin
described
the
process
as
ex-
was one
of England’s industrial development, rapid growth of her capitalist economy. Engels,
land-
conAlong
follows:
24
INTRODUCTION
owes
“Britain the of
the
Russian
“While
material.
shared
Marx
national
ment
programme For
of
her
colonial
Capital the latter
against
was to
them
movement
“an
p.
(see
114).
all
of
material
Ireland
social their
for
up
raw
of
agricultural “corn, wool,
with
drawing
for
ruthless-
suppliers
as
in
abundant
and
tenant
countries
and
opponents
with
ex-
towards
semi-barbarous,
148.)
recruits”
resistance
the
other
p.
Engels,
Ireland
convinced
20,
military
struggle
liberation
Vol.
and
of
misdeeds
poverty-stricken
and
them,
continual
of
of
to
colonialism
of
land
supplying
oppression,
the
moved
undeveloped,
appendages
referred
industrial
provided
lot
agrarian
England”
of
cattle,
the
as
Marx
district
and
an a
country, (Collected Works,
Ireland
to her
largely
recalls
Ireland
‘flourished’,
remained
exploited
which
and
Saltychikha.
agrarian
farmers.”
development
commerce
and
peasantry,
serf-owner
and
purely
ance
industry
Irish
Britain
tinction
ly
the
of
economic
‘brilliant’
her
of
‘prosperity’
treatment
her
the
and indict-
workers’
it.
oppression.
of
the
of
even even
as
the
Centuries
of
Irish
vitality
of
special
of
interest
boundless such
a
relatively
seat
the
of
resist-
national
small
people,
most systematic and cruel it. “‘After the most savage suppression, to exterminate them,” Engels wrote in
futility
of
the
measures to suppress after every attempt one of his fragments, “the Irish, following a short respite, stood stronger than ever before”’ (see p. 304). Marx and Engels were deeply impressed by the inexhaustible revolutionary energy of the Irish. ‘““Give me two hundred thousand Irishmen,” young Engels said, “and I could overthrow the entire British monarchy” (see p. 43). In Ireland Marx and Engels traced the ongins of the anti-colonial forces in an oppressed country, the gradual movement, its specific The and
Engels
biased English and
writings
here
studied
notion
features
Irish
down
the
the
the
national
liberation
trends.
show
history.
to
historians,
to earth
of
and
collected
traceable
bourgeois
brought
development
how They
thoroughly
economists romanticism
many
confuted
chauvinist
Marx
prejudices and of
a of
geographers, Insh
national-
ist historians. Bias, often disguised as objectivism, and tions of history to suit the class interest of privileged
distorsocial
25
ON I NT R O D UC T I
groups,
Marx
infuriated
and
Engels.
one
In
his
of
sketches,
into a commodity, hence also the writing of history. It is part of its being, of its condition for existence, to falsify all goods: it
wrote:
Engels
“The
turns
bourgeoisie
everything
falsified the writing of history. And the best-paid historiography is that which is best falsified for the purposes of the
(see p. 304). considered the
bourgeoisie”’
Engels Insh
History
and
interpretation volume,
the
tendency
p.
the
English
356).
posedly
of
In
that of
enslavement
this
cloak
(see
history.
shows
colonial
liberal
a
Character
characteristic
of
a
behind
‘the
Engels
the
intentions
Irish
of
this justify
Irish
English
English
his
typically
of
published
conception
English
“The
professor
in
reflects
bourgeoisie
Ireland.
bourgeois
Smith’s chauvinist
“Notes”,
Smith’s
the
Goldwin
to
apologetic
are
concealed
comments Engels about Smith exposes Smith’s attempt at whitewashing by specious explanations of their sup-
objectivity,”
Engels
invaders
civilising
mission,
that
they
cared
about
Concerning Smith’s discourse about the “spirit of patience’ and “liberal ideas” that supposedly motivated the policies of England’s ruling classes
flowering
towards
the
claiming
of
Ireland
country”.
writes: ‘And this when the English have been engaged in conquests throughout the century! ” (see p. 370). A bitter opponent of Irish independence who would not shrink from any argument to prove the “‘necessity” for England to retain power over the Irish people, Smith, as Engels emphasised, strove in every way to discredit the Irish national movement and present it as a futile undertaking causing fruitless sedition. Using of
liberal
tionary
her
as an
book
Smith’s
and
other
example,
historiographers
actions
ty remains retrograde
by
the
colonies,
Engels
was
popular
their
masses.
Engels
noted
that
another
trait
abhorrence of revolutrace of objectivi-
“No
wrote, describing in particular Smith’s attacks on the French Revolution of the end of the eighteenth century which had given a powerful push to, and led to an upsurge of, the liberation struggle in Ireland (see p. 365). The treatment by Marx and Engels of some of the key problems of Irish history 1s a credit to their scholarship. They created
an
here,”
he
essentially
new
conception
of
Irish
history
based
26
INTRODUCTION
on
the analytical method of historical materialism. Regrettably, neither published a complete study, elucidating the results of their investigation. We are compelled to glean their conclusions from handwritten notes and fragments, some of which
to
saw
first
Ireland
these
in
light
articles
provide
history
most
least
the
They
likewise
and
the
recently,
and
basis
Ireland,
of
only
letters.
a
of
important
English
history,
the
not
only
links
whole,
general
of
method,
but
entirely
valid,
however,
and
to
the at times.
of
explaining
modern
interconnection
between
their
references
interpretation
periods
True, many been made clarified and
But
still
as a
close
those
significance—are
Taken
antiquity
the
of St. George’s Channel. historical discoveries have Engels’s time, some facts published.
their
main
from
demonstrated
from
scientific
its
defining
and
observations
of
Insh
events on either archaeological since Marx’s
side
many and
many
of
since
the
new
and and
sources
judgments—and
purely
new
historical
material
has
corroborated them, adding to their value. Permanently valid, for example, is Engels’s assessment, his History of Ireland (1870), of the main sources knowledge equally
about
so
is
the
his
early
periods
characterisation
the
of
system of the Celts in exposed the chauvinist
Ireland,
their
content
of
special
philosopher
Imsh
of
history,
social
customs
argument
and
political
culture.
He
the Irish were culturally backward and incapable of running a state of their own. He demonstrated the significant contribution to Europe’s culture made in the early Middle Ages by Irish Christian missionaries and scholars, among whom he makes mention
the
of
whose doctrine, he wrote, “‘was led “‘close to Pantheism” (see p.
the
and
and
in of
Johannes
very
bold Irish
295).
that
Erigena,
Scotus
the history
time’’, before
for
and the
conquest, too, Engels stressed, abounded in resistance to foreign invaders—the Vikings, culminatthe Irish victory over the Norsemen at Clontarf in
Anglo-Norman
heroic ing
in
1014. Engels’s
study
of
the
survivals of clan relationships him to anticipate in 1870 some
the Insh Celts enabled conclusions about primitive Morgan,
the
distinguished
Ancient
Society
did
not
societies American
appear
drawn
by
ethnologist,
until
1877.
Lewis
among of
Henry
whose
Engels
the
used
book
the
27
INTRODUCTION
results of his investigations of Irish history in his book, The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State, published in 1884. In his appraisal of the degree of social development of Ireland im early feudal times, he recorded traits typical of that period (political disunity, feudal decentralisation, etc.), which made it relatively easy for the
conquerors,
Anglo-Norman
developed of
twelfth
In
Marx’s
16,
1867,
to
tion
and
the
the
Union
other
known
as
the
fought
was
Pale
and
conquer
suppressed, confiscated
the and
Ireland,
are
shown
in
subject,
the
clearer
it
19,
development turies back.
p.
1870,
by And
in
Engels’s
in
Engels’s
24,
February
we
day
an account
find
Ireland,
of
the
in the
English
of
showing base
later
part
south-eastern
a
1881,
of
entire island in the colony of English
as
put
Marx
253).
Destructive
national
risings
it,
wars
were
“of
were
brutally
bold
to
is
me,” Ireland
“‘that
the this
relief.
English
ever
“The Engels has
invasion since the
more wrote
been
and 12th
I study
to
Marx
stunted
in
thrown century”
the
on her
cen(see
400).
The decisive Engels stressed, the
Notes’’,
clan system forcibly exterminated, and land appropriated by aliens. The tragic conse-
quences January
Revolu-
Ireland,
“bulwark”,
p.
half
December
American
subjection
the
(see
latter
of
subjugation of the Ireland became
capitalists,
the
more
and
dated
the
from
established
landlordism”
to
the
collection,
colonial
until the centuries,
landlords
this
the
dated
History
Jenny
centunes,
the
the island 16th-17th English
of
in
Ireland
Extracts
his
for
daughter
stages
over
1801.
of
in
from
a
of
Ireland
on
“Ireland
notes works
invade
a report
for
work
Marx’s
main
how,
his
and
to in
notes
in
fragments
letter
to
feudal society, century.
the
representatives
17th-century
system
phase
came
in
at
the conquest of Ireland, Marx the time of English absolutism
bourgeois
revolution,
when
the
and and
capitalist
gradually expanded and the feudal barriers to its growth were torn down. Ireland then fell prey to the rising bourgeoisie and the gentry who were turning bourgeois. Marx and Engels demonstrated that every change in England in that stormy age—the Tudor and early Stuart era, the English revolution and Cromwell’s protectorate, the Stuart Restora-
ON I NT R O DU C T I
28
tion,
an
and
the
intensification
colonial
among
estates
English
of
crushed
the
the
and
‘‘The
a
bloody
Insh
James
people
into
phase
nation
and in
the
completely William
to
English
own
land wrote
Engels
|
Marx
and
in
Engels
the
at
issued
studied
subsequent
the
end
combating
the
and (see
383).
rule
of
and
given
their
outcasts,”
of
for
expansion
were
Cromwell
outlawed
her
redivision and
people
robbed
which
methods
forcible
I, Oliver
Ireland
for
in
consolidation
landholdings
Irish
a new
most
the
invaders
their
Orange,
1688—was
accumulation’,
Elizabeth,
transformed
of
used
landlordism.
by
invaders,
p.
suppression,
“primitive
of
of
Revolution’’
of
ravishers
purposes
of
“Glorious
forms
periods.
the
of
the
seventeenth
plots,
Catholic
For
century, enslavement of and civil rights,
eighteenth
and
were
them
the
century
on
tool
the
for
colonial
penal
laws
pretext
the
almost
enforced
a
English
of
throughout expropria-
final
tion and the Irish people, robbing them of political rooting out their national culture, customs and traditions. In his excerpts and notes about one of the most dramatic periods in Irish history—from the midto
seventies
the
end
of
the
colonial
clearly
exposes
English
ruling
classes.
period
under
the
the
eighteenth
oppression
Public
imposed
by
the
in Ireland developed in that two revolutionary events of
life
influence
very
century—Marx
of
world-historical importance—the American War of Independence of 1775-83 and the French bourgeois revolution of
1789-94. In the powerful ruling and
Irish
circles
accusatory
and
then
courts,
use
of
shows
a
means
spying,
in
mercenaries
of
a
“divide
acting and
on rule’,
the
ancient
England’s
whole
oppression:
and.
of
terrorist
Roman
statesmen
the
colonialists’
series
of
police
arbitrari-
patriots
groups, Marx
conquerors’
went
on
exceptional
hypocritical only.
vicious
light of
the
by
England’s
especially
that
persecution
moments, of back-tracking, temporary concessions for show
that,
an
casting
it
critical and
overthrown
document
contained
political
provocations,
to
manuscript is
rule
movement,
years
policy
Marx
their
liberation
those
Marx’s
force.
economic
ness,
in
this
of
already
having
national
policy.
crafty
avoid
resorted
particularities arsenal
to
order
out
both in
aw
and, promises,
emphasised principle of
their
of
way
29
INTRODUCTION
carry
to
social
dissent
and
(England
them
by
these
the
forced
between
methods
that
union
Great
of
firing
the
Pro-
the
Irish
Britain
Scotland) and Ireland. Engels demonstrated the colonialist nature of Act of Union of 1801, and stressed that it was a sequel to suppression of the Trish rising of 1798, the military
the the
and
occupation
and
Parliament.
made
during
laws
autonomy. tive
in
Farming local
in
by
the
tion
The
any
at
land,
of
Union
peasants
by
landlords
capitalist
exploitation of
product.
This
Engels
in
English
his
ruling
the
industries
apply
a system and
(Marx
(and
it” This
Engels’s
of
the
Irish
called
by
a
it
features
semi-feudal
shown by Marx in to N. F. Danielson of June 10, 1890. The classes, Marx wrote in his article, ‘““The Indian Tenant
(see p. system
Right’’, of
created
society’
which
to to
in
Ireland
enable
a
‘“‘those
small
caste
the Insh people the terms hold the land and to live
71). of
exploitation
population The
now occupa-
too often the necessary) Capital (Vol. III) and by
all
is
‘conditions
Irish
the
had the
worst
the
appropriation,
a
142).
middlemen combined
as
crippled.
people
p.
protec-
which
between (see
and
lifted
to
plunder
with
The
were were
of
which
surplus
rule.
“The
of
parliamentary
activity
itself.
rapacious lordlings to dictate which they shall be allowed
upon
only
French
most
letter
Question—Irish
abominable
budding the
was
Parliament
colonial
Parliament
established
rack-renting”’)
methods,
Irish
wrote, “the choice rent, or starvation”
of
“system
Britain’s
practically Marx
the
the
of
Government
Irish
could
them,”
the
of
abolished
Ireland’s
population
before
English
the
gains
decades and
phase
became
latter
the
of
repeal
a new
and
the
the
on
bear
Irish
American
Union
passed
in
the
important concessions, to and to recognise Irish
The
tariffs
result,
when
grant
penal
revival
to
brought
robbed
pressure
under
to
revolutions
brutally
Union
national
century,
compelled,
ushered
The
the
eighteenth
the
pressure
the
Irish
the
was
bribery,
of
discord
on
playing
and
Marx
on
on
thrust
use
wide
sowing
It
camp,
national
making
Catholics.
had
Irish
and
fanaticism
people
Of
the
contradictions,
religious testants
of
into
Condition
to of
of
appalling the
the
small
tenant
poverty,
Working-Class
reduced
described in
England
in and
30
in
INTRODUCTION
other
works
failures
resulted
passed,
however,
perienced.
people.
the
periodic
so
the
basis
‘The
Irish
population,’
millions.
some
of
Atlantic” In
the
p.
(see
whom
by
the
of
on
itself
was
potato
the
disastrous
crop
1845-47
of
been
of
previously
crop surex-
Recurrent
That
had
failure
more
was
that
that
total
impressed
Marxism.
of
famines.
anything
almost
grain
of has
two
founders
immeasurably
export event
in
The
rendered
the
of
the
starved,
while
No
the
of
wrote,
Marx
rent.
landlords’
memory
the
continued Irish
“decreased
others
by
fled
across
by
a new
105).
century
mid-19th
the
were
Irish
struck
part precipitated by the famine. Landowners began to refuse to rent out the small strips of land customarily sown to grain or potatoes. Instead, they took up large-scale grazing, to the accompaniment of wholesale evictions. disaster,
in
Marx
acute the
and
social
causes,
showing lords, after
and
national
nature
that
it
the
repeal
prices, wanted Irish nation,
of
in
and
corn
cheaper however,
even
livelihood,
pursued the
as
contradictions.
farmers of
process
this
consequences
and
was
tenant
big
saw
Engels
the
laws
the
1846
animal products. For the agrarian change
the
home.
Marx
big
bourgeoisie the
and
upheaval,
the
of
and
hearth
of
demonstrated
agrarian
interest English
in
source
fresh
They
of
the
a
landwho,
fall in bread
bulk
of the loss of
meant described
it
as
“quiet business-like extinction” (see p. 133), marking the beginning of a continuous decline in the population of Ireland mainly by forced emigration. As Marx’s daughter Eleanor put it, Ireland became the Niobe of the nations, a country that was losing her children. “In
1855-66,”
Marx
wrote,
“1,032,694
Irishmen
were
displaced by 996,877 head of cattle.”” The most urgent need was to end the forcible eviction of peasants and to stop the landlords, backed by the English authonities, from robbing the Insh farmers of their livelihood. This, Marx and Engels stressed, must be the first objective for the Irish national liberation movement. They focussed their attention emancipation, tracing it back to the clans the
to
the
Middle
invasion Ages,
of
which
on
the
stout
the
Anglo-Norman
was
repeated
at
Irish fight resistance of feudal
the
time
knights of
for the
in
Britain’s
31
INTRODUCTION
16th-
and
17th-century
colonial
expansion.
Thus,
1641-52
in
1689-91, Ireland was the scene of general insurrections against English rule. The national resurgence at the end of the eighteenth century was another important landmark, culminating in the 1798 rising. Marx and Engels wrote in glowing terms of the Irish revolutionaries of that period, the and
founders
Tone,
the
of
Edward
The
and
others.
Marx
and
Engels
of
features
are
of the
Irish
examined
outlook. Thus, manuscript “Ireland of
tions by
of
the
a
various
main
their
of
classes
author
scien-
of
Irish the
clearly
the
the
the
a
profound of
the
the
role
poor.
dialectical
Irish
forces
shows
society, urban
the
of
gives
motive
and
and of
course
the
and
time
Irish movement stages of its evolution,
examined the main
light
detail
The roots
that
masses grasp
perfect
in
social
at
peasant
the
with
the
of
movement
national it
traces struggle.
liberation
people’s
explanation
the
for
Marx
1801’?
in
a
of
example, in his above-mentioned from the American Revolution to the
tific
Union
Wolfe
provide something liberation movement. Its
national
closely
United*Irishmen,
of
Society
Fitzgerald
works
chronicle
patriotic
A
posi-
played
in
researcher
method,
Marx
in its development, revealed and exposed the antagonistic
within it, pointing out which of these gained the upper hand at various stages. Marx considered the main characteristic of this process to be the growth of the struggle for parliamentary autonomy—a struggle led in the main within a constitutional framework under the aegis of liberal elements in the Irish nobility and bourgeoisie who stood at the head of the armed patriotic organisation of Irish tendencies
a
Volunteers—into bourgeoisie
They
call
republic The
the
national
interests
Catholic Orientation
for
was on
was
to
as
from
parliamentary
of
in
this
a
call
be
methods
of
for
the
national
one:
radical
independent
France
equal
the
semi-feudal
a
an in
given
meaning
by
for
the
movement. masses and the
popular replaced
proclaimed
Catholics
masses
struggle
elements fore
the
of
that
of
interpreted
peasant
the
became
for
demand
to
programme
autonomy along the lines
Protestants
revolutionary
Progressive
came
gradually
expressed
moderate the
genuinely
independence.
country’s
in
1792.
rights
liberation
with of
the
slavery, while the struggle gave way to
39
INTRODUCTION
—_—-__
calls
national
for
rebellion.
was
to the
resistance—up
Marx
considered that formation in 1791 of the
the
moment,”
this
“From
merges
Volunteers
question
Catholic
was
that
became
struggle the
longer
came,
as
Irishmen
“the
movement
that
United
the
of
Irish
changes Society. the
of
Irishmen.
people.
The
ques-
The
to remove disabilities from the Catholic upper and middle classes, but to emancipate the Insh peasant, for the vast part Catholic. The question became social as to its matter, assumed French political principles, as to its form, remained national”’ (see p. 175). The highest stage of the development of the liberation tion
no
armed
in these
United the
of
an
including
Rubicon
wrote,
he
into
and
United
giving
Marx
Irishmen
popular
uprising
progressive
strata of dependence
colonial
Irish
of
the
United
ance
the
of
the
In
time
and
stressed
role
of
path,
character.
heroic
explaining
efforts
in
the
The the
of
the
deepening
weaker
reasons
the
events
revolutionary their
wing
Left
revolutionary
the
movement
same
the
Irish
century,
eighteenth
open
Irishmen
at
Marx
defeat,
the
the
to berate the country from the doors to the unavoidable
society
reforms.
when
democratic
crowned
and
bourgeois-democratic
took
profoundly
1798
of
1795
in
society
a
movement
the
noted,
for
histoncal
at
the and
sides its
signific-
end
the
of
consolidating
Insh people’s traditions of freedom. His work demonthe importance of analysing the lessons to be drawn
strates
events for which oppressed
these
from
under necessity of
the
the
mass
Irishmen’s
come
the
for
enslaved
the
achieve gressive Marx’s
of
struggle nation the
an
understanding
and
revolutionary national forces and
for
Engels’s
conditions
social
and
interests needs
the
striving
the of
United
to
over-
Protestants
and
Catholics
and
the
Irish
people’s
pro-
of
democratic works
the
considered
legacy—their
between
a
satisfying
Marx
consolidation
on
the
people may be liberated to be both for the national
people.
discord
of
and
basis—to
be
letters
give
very valuable. an assessment
of the revolutionary deeds of the Irish peasantry (Whiteboys, Ribbonism, etc.); the movement for repeal of the Anglo-Irish
Union; the Irish revolutionary organisations—Young Ireland and the Insh Confederation—which attempted insurrection in 1848; the petit-bourgeois Fenians who repeated the attempt
33
ON I NT R O DU C T I in
1867;
the
account
Their thorough.
of
movement;
Rule
the
agitation
of
the
Land
etc.
League,
mass
Home
Marx
the
the
of
people,
the
movement
Fenian
maintained
that
lower
it
orders”’
“‘took
(see
p.
is particularly root only in the 136), expressing
protest against evictions and the nation’s craving for national independence and social emanéipation. Marx and Engels alike praised the bourgeois Home Rule Confederation and its leader, Charles Stewart Parmell (whose work is examined in many of Marx’s and Engels’s letters of the late seventies and early eighties and by Engels after Marx’s death), who, at the height of the movement, sought contact with the Irish masses. They praised Parnell for his part in founding the Land League. It was popular support, indeed, that helped the champions of Home Rule to gain their impressive political strength and to profit by the contradictions between the English ruling parties. Marx and Engels admired the freedom-loving traditions of the
the
farmers’
Irish.
Moreover,
they
believed
that
the
Irish
people’s
struggle had a fruitful influence on the English public mind. The Irish are teaching our leisurely John Bull to get a move ” Engels wrote to one of his correspondents (see p. 450). And in ““The English Elections’’, an article written in 1874, he described the fighting Irish and the demonstrations of the English workers as the “motive forces of English political development”’ (see p. 428). At
same
the
time,
they
were or
far
from
idealising
the
movement in Ireland, anywhere else, for they were always keenly aware of its weak sides at different stages of its growth and of its heterogeneous class composition. Ina letter to Eduard Bernstein dated June 26, 1882, Engels observed that the Irish movement consisted of two trends: the radical agrarian that erupted into spontaneous peasant national
actions
was
and
tionaries, tion of the sympathies
2-226
by
democrats
and_
revolu-
on
the one hand, and the “liberal-national opposiurban bourgeoisie” (see p. 451), on the other. The of Marx and Engels lay naturally with the radical
wing which was of Ireland and The
represented
policy
of
oriented expressed the
towards the the social
Imsh
liberals
revolutionary liberation demands of the people. (their
narrow
national
34
INTRODUCTION
programme,
their
fear
setting
of
loose
energy of
of the people, their appeals conciliation and of deals with
severe
evoked
as
sharp,
the
the
errors
and
either.
Marx
They
and
indeed,
extremely
often
O’ Connell.
the
of
Engels
disapproved
revolutionary
moderation, their love English ruling classes)
for the
was,
which
case of Daniel class narrowness
in
But
criticism,
the
radicals,
criticised, the
of
pick the national
many
and
leaders’
right
illusions
escape
not
did
F enian
plotting, their inability to to a given situation, their
whose
them
adventurist
means
tactical
suited typical of so
narrowness,
to understand the importance of contacts with the English democratic, especia’ ly proletarian, movement. Engels wrote scathingly that‘ these gentry the whole labour movement is pure heresy and the Irish peasant must not on any account be allowed to other
know
Irish
that
p.
(see
the
refusal
are
socialist
workers
Irish
proietariat
rising
prominent
ment.
role
his
sole
allies
in
Europe”
Marx
tion
Land
in
the
on
1869
national.
a
class
Labour
mitiative
They
the
among
and,
and
the
course,
of
League the
of
welcomed
International
other
the
things,
in
founded
General
move-
Men’s
autumn
the
the
Insh
of
Association
its
of
participa-
of
Council
establishment
Working
its
a
play
the
and
as
must,
country’s national liberation Engels welcomed the early signs
in
awakening
of
their
397).
The
of
leaders,
in
Inter-
sections Ireland,
Britain and the United States, and gave rebuff to the attempts of the reformists from the British Federal Council to gain control over these sections. They cultivated the Great
friendship him
where In
the
of
Secretary with
was
the
interested
in
of
trade
unions
national Marx
General
the
fact
with the
settled
the
Irish
that
Irish
workers
branches
in
Party
interests
of
the
and
Engels
for
Irish
were
their
the
United
was
were one
Labourers,
He
keenly
joining
the
the
new
of
censured
Federation sectarian
States,
workers.
Engels
Ireland.
contacts
Their
immigrant
nineties
Social-Democratic
Labour
in
early General
Corresponding
Ireland.
for
and and
Gasworkers
of
he
after
eighties
MacDonnell,
Council
among
active
late
Union
dependent
Patrick
continued
he
leaders
Joseph
of
and disregard
the
the of
Inthe
workers. untiring
in
their
exposure
of
35
INTRODUCTION
English
police
brutality
agaist
Irish
revolutionaries.
Their
public statements, together with the articles of Jenny, Marx’s elder daughter, and those of other leaders of the International denouncing English reprisals against Irish freedom fighters, inhuman treatment in English jails and the humiliating
conditions
for
amnesty,
English
imposed
were,
etc.,
the in
English
a
effect,
as
authorjties scathing
the
price
indictment
of
were
rigid police control and coercion laws, on the one hand, and petty half-hearted reforms, on the other, designed to distract attention from the crying need for more fundamental changes. These were coupled with small concessions to the upper crust of Insh society—the Irish bourgeoisie, landowners and top Catholic clergy—designed to split
rule.
by
and
There
weaken
the
camp.
national
was
brutality
Gross
accompanied by demagogy and half-measures that did little alleviate the lot of the Irish people. Thus Marx and Engels assessed the agrarian and other English-sponsored reforms in Ireland, particularly the Land Acts of 1870 and 1881. “But something had to be done to pull the wool over the eyes of the public. It was essential to appear to be doing something for Ireland,’’ Marx wrote (see p. 260).
to
The the
only
Irish
people
contained
in
programme
was
based
the
Insh
on
the
English
2*
liberation
other
Irish
to
of
the
oppressed
Marx
and
saw free
form
with
It
relationship the oppressed
working
national
and
insisted
pointed for
oppression
the
Their
social
revival
was
repeal
of of
and Ireland, and of secession. As
and
England
political
in
the
changes in the
the
choice
the
of
the two countries The duty of the
to
support elimination
and
is
been the slogans of not rule out a future
that
out,
democracy
demanded
between nation.
to
and
did
Ireland
of
social
of
choice
have
They
federation
they
this
should
of
to self-determination
right peoples.
it, those movement.
interests Engels.
and
imposed union of Great Britain for Ireland including the right
workers,
independence,
forms
by
of
basic
true
of
written
and
appropriate should rest
the
principles
of propitious radical country. But they
latter
the
national
labour
voluntary
the
with
[reland’s
Engels
English
event
and
recognition
and
and
consistent
documents for
the forcibly independence Marx
solution
coercion.
back
the
the
Irish in
right
fight
Ireland
Lenin
of
for of
all
described
36
this
INTRODUCTION
as
splendid
“‘a
example
the
of
attitude
the
proletariat
of
the oppressor nations should adopt towards national movements, an example which has lost none of its immense practical importance.” (Collected Works, Vol. 20, p. 442.) Marx’s recommendations are still valid. He pointed out that the struggle for Ireland’s national independence should fuse with that for the revolutionary remaking of the agrarian system (he spoke of it as “agrarian revolution’’, see p. 158), stressing that political mdependence in itself, necessary though it is, cannot guarantee that the former colony is relieved
every
of
country.
metropolitan achieve
economic
introduce tion
element To
English
of
30,
November
be
genuinely
independence.
protective
industry
p.
1867,
(see
the
former
must Irish to
independent
Marx
against
tariffs
on
dependence
of
advised
it
the
the
destructive
Marx’s
letter
competi-
to
Engels,
158).
The liberation of colonial and dependent countries in recent years, and the subsequent history of Ireland, bear out these views of Marx and Engels. Their orientation towards revolutionary methods is proved correct by the experience of the
colonial
and
struction social
up In
ed
the
who
have
shaken
off
the
struggle
for
idea
that
with
intemal
combmed
the
their
away
interest
on
writings
essential
Ireland,
connection
recon-
social
economic
an
the
be
peoples is
of the masses, sweeping consequences of colonial rule independent economy.
in
and
so
And
must
independence
ing
dependent
oppressors.
their
Marx
and
Engels
between
the
national
and
the build-
demonstratliberation
movement and the workers’ struggle for the socialist reconstruction of the world. They called on the English workers and the fighters for Ireland’s independence to join hands. Engels,
and
Chartists
1840s
(see
Chartists”
the
example,
for
time
workers
his and of
time
the
advocated
Irish
First
and
International,
time
again
no
emancipation
of Ireland
is
humanitarian
sentiment.
but
social
emancipation”
and
O’Connor
“‘Feargus
Bill
Coercion
‘The
(see
p.
bonds
that
Marx
408).
first
Marx
for
of
Irish
in
the the
People”’).
At
the the
abstract
Engels
the
and
told
condition
and
as
early Ireland
them
“for
question the
the
between
as
movement
liberation
articles, the
close
of
English national
justice their
or own
emphasised
37
INTRODUCTION
_
the and
on
ruinous effects national strife
among
them.
Anglo-Irish the
They
it
class.
colonial
development
strengthened
Looking
way
back,
conquest out the ress”’
the
they
hand
window,” how
people
the
of
the
Union,
he
upper
colonising in
an
standing
army
and
the
people
on
both
another
forges
his
key
postulates
ers
to
p.
an
a
the
things,
that
chains,’’
that
show
the
the
how
the The and
of
suppress
the
the
oppresses worded one of
he
for
position
in
that
importance
internationalist
size
to
used
was
of
177).
aristocracy
nation
“Any
p.
(see
English
machine
islands.
having
passage
its
of
the
Republic
1801,
of
itself
in
“England’s distfor the English
increasing
for
police
Marx’s
exploiting
English
138).
result state
parent
own
(see
well,
in
the
work-
co-
national
Communication”’,
“Confidential
255).
was
For
an
Marx ally
and
of
exploitation.
processes
the
the
ally
itself
capitalist
of
the
national
working-class
saw they
the with
saw human the
oppression
against
interaction
and
the it,
was
peasants and
the
Whereas
{reland
would
English probable
the
system
the
liberative
countries.
decisive
factor
from all exploitation, in the fight against
with
the
movement in freeing the oppressed peoples. Ireland’s fight for independence was tionising effect on the English workers, action.
of
metropolitan
race
movement
liberation
struggle
the
colonies
as
class,
emancipation
must
Engels
They
in
working
and
as
the
Union
of
gave excuse
working
adopt matter
on
as
engaging
consequences
out,
bourgeoisie
lonial
brake
nation
other
“By
p.
(see
the Act
the
pointed
its
was a ruling
among
threw
wrote
evaluated
régime
of
the
the implantation of the new under Oliver Cromwell paved
Cromwell
intensification
oligarchic
case
in
the
of
Restoration.
Marx
Marx
ideology cultivate
were eager to
oppressor
showed,
Stuart
Ireland,
of
is
mind
the
for
chauvinist
oppression
the
of
the plunder of Irish land and English aristocracy in Ireland the
the
demonstrated—graphically
relations—that
progressive
because
the workers of that the capitalists
national
to
have rousing
of
The in
the
but it feudal
liberation
a
revoluthem to
in the forties and fifties Marx had held that gain her freedom through the victory of the working class, in the sixties he considered it more that Irish victory would spark off the English
38
INTRODUCTION
workers’ Marx to
fight Engels,
wrote class
Marx
“the
in
as
not
oppressor
liberated
“However,
under
influence
a
‘What
another.’ Ireland
English
freed
strengthened
as
reaction
number
is
).”’
allowing
the
for
would
liberate
working
people
of
the
English of
nologically. first
At
included
the
publication,
English
translation
the
end
in
this
of
each
language
was
the
kK
made
in
440.)
forms
the
oppressed
and
on
depend
cases.
between
a world as a as well as
a
of
convinced that and the fighters
all
is
(just
the
these
in
union
p.
20,
workers,
England,
x works
class
England
Ireland
enslavement
which
essential
fraternal
them and all the workers free, progressive future for
The
by
until
free
in of
variety
were
and Engels the working
was
idea and
inevitable
assumed correctsubjugated
and be
Vol.
a
adopting bourgeois
and
Reaction
Works,
the
time,
by The
never
her
the
of
long
fairly
enslavement
of
class
to have
wil
by
Ireland
working
view
nation
processes
mdependence the
his
themselves—for
varying situations—Marx internationalist unity of championed
a
for
yoke.
the
Marx’s
movement movement
stronger
class
(Collected
revolutionary
national
a
fostered
the
of
peoples
by
chronic,
that
English
grew
English
Russia
the
liberals
it is for
the
nations!
of
While
course
in
that
reconsidered
fostered
1870,
in
thought
national
working
from
and
Marx
Ireland
misfortune
The is
in Marx
and
by lost,
5,
change
the liberals, and itself leaderless.
left
forms.
the
working-class
the
of to
was
March
somnolent
for
the
the
letter
404).
first
happened
appendage policy
revolutionary
p.
by by
movement
liberation it.
so
it
the
became an liberal-labour
ed
“At
nation, but nation...
now
reasons
the
on
Lafargue
till
(see
forms”’
follows:
be
Laura
England,
acute
oppressed
fell
and
explained
viewpoint would
Paul
war
Lenin
(see above—mentioned 10, 1869). Once Ireland
December
to
assume
will
socialism
for
union
the for
They
the
Irish
between
condition Ireland.
a
for
Ok
collection
are of
the and,
are
arranged
chro-
indicated
the
of
original
from
wherever
the
date
its
which
the
text
was
39
INTRODUCTION
originally tion
Engish,
is
supplied
indexes,
though of
“Chronology
or
damaged
same
the
various
also
edition
here
reproduced.
with
notes,
and
with
some
minor
characters
notes
illegible.
given
themselves
collec-
and
subiect
mentionea
have
where
abbreviations
supplied
by
untitled
left
brackets.
square
name
brackets places
titles
fragments
square
used
the
Certain
The
and
in
in
The
in
the
listed.
square
in
editors
method. works
are not
Ireland”’
Explanatory text by the
the
the
In
brackets,
the
these
to
manuscript
is
af¥e
given
the
editors
by
cases
the
added
been
their
where
have
in
full
the
authors
are
the
been
by
for
authors
changed
to
cursive. This
edition
printed
twice, the
from
an
is
enlarged
1971
in
American
Engels’s
Goldwin
Character’? have been former work was for archives
the
of
Longuet,
and
researchers.
additional
volume
(Vol.
Collected
History
text
this in
only works
the in
descendants has
of
Works
of
the
Irish
Marx
and
In
view
troduction
and
reference
first
to the
45.
Union
Engels.
of
the
material
Irish
the
an
edition
of
“‘Varia
on
Russian
included
accordance
with
contents,
edition
of
in
1975
in
Engels’s
this
Jenny
hands
previously
changed
in
and
and
daughter,
published
Confiscations’’, reprinted in
1801”
collection. The in the personal
into
second
“Ireland
History
eldest
come
of
was
which
manuscript
Irish
Marx’s
45)
now
Vol.
of
were
is
first,
in the present time preserved
recently
collection,
the
of
Marx’s to the
Smith’s
added a long
Both
the
1974.
and
Revolution
on
“Notes
version
the
have
the In-
been
revised. L.
I.
Golman
Moscow
KARL
MARX AND
FREDERICK
ENGELS
Ireland and
the
Irish
Question
Frederick
LETTERS
One hears Irish Repeal gland).2
the
pass
to
helped
House
himself
again
about
it
again
more; raking up
in
the
the
then
order
to
be
stale
obsolete
Enthe and
rejected
by
London
left
and
and 1s now one was thinking up in Dublin and
debates No
turns
Dan*
Old
and
Commons
suddenly
the
during
of
repeal.
of
who
House
parliamentary
question and
lawyer,
in
has
and
O’Connell of Ireland
Union
measures the
about
old
O’Connell
old
any
talk
the
calmly
from
his
LONDON!
cunning
“liberal’’ Lords,
of
absented raising
sat
but
of
the
government
Whig
is
(abolition
O’Connell,
FROM
now
nothing
Engels
It is not
lumber.
surpnis-
yeast is now producing remarkable airbubbles. The cunning old fox is going from town to town, always accompanied by a bodyguard such as no king ever ing
that
the
had—two How
old
hundred
much
could
men, seen
and
a
thousand
to
nothing genuine
have
lose,
people
been
done
or
popularity
O’Connell’s
understanding hundred
thousand if
little
if
always
a
had
men—and
egoism
what
two-thirds
child
of
under
a
The
nature.
Irishman From
broken-down
his roof,
===
*
Daniel
is
O’Connell.—£ad.
a
carefree,
native
on
weak
who
tea
the where and
have
in
rags,
has
Irish-
never
two
cheerful,
heath,
who
moreover,
me
Irishmen cannot know them. Give thousand Irishmen and I will overthrow
Two
clothed
proletarians and sansculottes and, wild, headstrong, fanatical Gaels. One
monarchy.
vanity!
People
are
whom
of
and
men!
him!
man possessed a little more
sensible
O’Connell
less
surround
hundred entire British potato-eating he
meagre
grew food,
up, he
44
is
. .
s u d d en ly t hro w n
in t o
. ,, ,
o u r c iv ilisa t ion
FREDERICK
ENGELS
. , , . ., . , , . , H u nge r
-
d r iv es
-
hi m
to
y b ur ly o f ice co ld hur l t h e mec ha n ica l ego is t ic his pass i ons a re a ro u se d W h a t t h e Eng lis h f a c t ory t o w ns l o w — w h o s e y o u t h w a s spen t p la y ing d oes t h is ra w y o u ng f e l on mo ors and b egg ing a t t he roa d s id e — k no w o f t h rif t ? He sq u a nd ers w h a t h e e arns t h en h e s t arv es unt il t he ne x t pa y d a y or u n t il h e aga in f in d s w or k H e is a c c u s t ome d t o go ing h ungry T h en h e go e s b a c k s ee k s o ut t he me m b ers o f h is f a m ily on t h e roa d w h ere t h e y ha d sc a tt ere d in or d er t o b eg f rom t ime t o t ime assem b ling aga in aro u n d t h e t eapo t w hic h t h e m o t h er carr ie s w it h h er B ut in E ng la n d t h e I r is h ma n sa w a grea t d ea l he a t t en d e d p u blic mee t ings a n d w or k ers ’ assoc ia t ions h e k no w s w h a t R epea l is and w h a t S ir R o b er t P ee l s t an d s f o r h e q u it e c ert a inly h as o f t en h a d f ig h t s w it h t h e po lice an d co uld t e ll y o u a grea t d ea l a b o u t t he h eart less ness a n d disgra ce f ul b e h a v io u r o f t he “ P ee lers ’ ’ ( t he po lice ) H e h as a ls o heard a lo t a b o u t D anie l O ’ C onne ll N o w h e onc e more re t u ms t o h is o ld co tt age w it h it s bit o f land f o r po t a t oes T he po t a t oes are rea d y f o r ha r v es t ing he digs t h em up a nd no w h e h a s s om e t hing t o liv e on d u ring t he w int er B u t h ere t h e pr inc ipa l t enan t ? appears d e m a n d ing t h e ren t G oo d G o d w h ere ’ s t h e mo ne y t o c o me f rom ? T he pr inc ipa l bl e t o t he la n d o w ne r f o r t he re n t an d t he re t ena nt 1s respons i f ore h as his proper t y a t t ac he d T he I r is h man o ff ers res is t a nce and is t h ro w n int o go a l F ina lly h e is se t f re e aga in and soon a f t erw ard s t h e princ ipa l t enant o r some one e lse w h o t oo k pa rt in t h e a t t a c h me n t o f t he propert y is f o u n d d ea d in a it c h T ha t is a s t ory f rom t he lif e o f t h e Ir is h pro le t arians w hic h is o f d a ily occ urrence T he h a lf sa v a ge u p b r ing ing and la t e r t h e c omp le t e ly c iv ilise d en v ironm ent b ring t he Eng l a nd
In
,,. . ,, ,
, ., .
. . ,
-
-
-
. , , . , ,, ,. , , ,
I ris h ma n
-
in t o
c on t ra d ic t ion
w it h
hi mse lf
in t o
a
s t at e
of
permane n t irr it a t ion o f con t in ua lly s mo u ld er ing f u ry w hic h ma k es him capa b le o f an y t hing In a ddit ion h e b ea rs t he b u r d en o f f iv e cent ur ies o f oppress ion w it h a ll it s c onseq u enc es Is it s urpris ing t ha t lik e an y o t h er h a lf sa v age he s t rik es o ut b lindly a nd f urio us ly on e v er y oppor t u n it y t h a t his e y es b urn w it h a perpe t u a l t hirs t f o r re v enge a d es t ru c t iv e f ury f or w hic h it is a lt oge t h er a ma t t er o f indiff erence w ha t it 1s d irec t e d aga ins t so long as
-
LETTERS
it
FROM
can
out
strike
violent
national
orthodox
45
LONDON
and
the
of
that
Protestant-episcopal arrogance—with ing can be accomplished. And all hands.
O’Connell’s his
disposal!
The
men,
so
emperor
had.
ever
were
not
could
a
such
all
Repeal
as is
to
has.
his
Union;
of
had
the
people,
upright, would be
i.e.,
But
consistent have
any
left
idle
Old-Norman
the
people
Daniel be
just
were
O’Connell
as
much
Tories high association his
Irishmen
rejects
the
appearances
and with
to
sake
in
what
does
he
solely
for
Robert the
Peel
head
achieve
and
of
with
desperate
the
because
into
office this
a
wretched he
his
is
juste-milieu
well
enough,
in
his
the
purely
and
Catholic
That
is
offered
now
by
that
is
socialism, the and
is
rub.
If
would
soon
to
leave
that talks
wams
he is
the close
Daniel’s
why
Chartists,5
again
the
then
aristocrats
the clergy,
or
moment,
as he wants reason for
dry
dangerous
a
longer
districts,
there for
soldier
no
would
an
but
English
Catholic
But
even
moneyed
dry. the
last
there
castle.
and
Whig,
double-faced
free
high
he
at
since,
his
set
left
against
support
long
be
and
agitation
Sir
while
then
priest
baron
the
what
knows
not
democrat, Ireland
welfare
quite enough to keep all Ireland really the man of the people, if and were not himself afraid of
were
Protestant
any
too,
are were
he
if
the
not he is misusing the impoverished, in order to embarrass the Tory
courage
sufficient
had
it
course
Peel,
hence 25,000 soldiers in check. If O’Connell he
Cork—150,000
millions of valiant to accomplish even
unable
Robert
Sir
and
know
serious about it, because oppressed Irish people Ministers and to put back friends.
anythare in are at
really concerned to petty juste-milieut aims
demanded
now
he
the
of
the
were
clamour
like
he
if
and
He
in
The
against
people
of
really
O’Connell
the
truly
power
his
Irishmen?
clergy
elements elements
yesterday
view, if he his miserable,
him
force
if
all
should
refuse
these these
multitude
before
And
behind
Repeal—I
the
all.
Saxons,
in Nenaph—200,000, today in Kilkenny— it goes on. A triumphal procession lasting triumphal procession such as no Roman
people in poverty—if
of
a
what
day
yesterday 400,000, and a fortnight, a the abolish
And
the
by
fostered
not
is
against
Gaels
fanaticism
Catholic
But
destroy?
hatred
why
although about
he for
de-
46
FREDERICK
mocracy—just Republican succeed
the
in
Irish
achieving
people,
dangerous
Published
than
in
Republikaner
June
as Louis Philippe in his day talked institutions-and that is why he will
27, 1843
anything
which
to
51,
the
long
the
political
run
is
to
about
never
education
no
one
and
F.
of
more
himself.
Schwetzerischer
No.
in
but
ENGELS
K.
Marx
Collected
pp.
Works,
389-91
Engels,
Vol.
3,
Frederick
THE
CONDITION
London Giles
couple
part
avenues
in
crooked,
market fruits,
still
appearance
wish
to
with
the
the
slums the
in
in
the
broad,
a
a
most
splendid
about,
in
the
Regent
Street,
disorderly
collec-
houses,
there
of
by
the
of
idles
is
order.
rookery
midst
Street,
It
Strand.
their
penetrated
by
Oxford
which
be
London
of
in
famous
to
four-storied
narrow,
with
as
is quite
much
as
life
live
the
with places I had
in
below
the
working-class
said.
note-book
given
article
almost of
narrow
the
literally
The
article
an
M.D.”
is
is
districts and entitled
and
in ““The
are
without,
and
could
in
Dwellings
between
the
houses,
all description.
been
London
possibly
comparison
alleys
written
Magazine
everywhere
houses
between
already
Illuminated
the
in
surpass
ruin had
and
being
passages
from
The
nothing
courts
as
well
within
human
this
tottermg
an
in
no
all
as
smell.
filthy
covered
and
filth
horrible
that the
by
description
across
a
But
these,
from
garret,
such
them.
entered
which The
1s
in
dwellings
streets,
to
the
of
arises
cellar
from
their
what
the
and
further, stalls,
occupied
many
TOWNS
surrounded of
or
is
Giles
thoroughfares
fish-dealers’
dealing
GREAT
world
and
streets,
filthy
sidewalk
*
rf
town, except that, here, of the working-class only are to be seen. A vegetable is held in the street, baskets with vegetables and naturally all bad and hardly fit to use, obstruct the
people
came
gay
three
great
the
in
St.
town,
the
Square
tall,
of
the
THE
neighbourhood
Trafalgar
in
chapter
the
of
which
immediate tion
ENGLAND6
streets.
broad
of
populous
of
WORKING-CLASS
us investigate some of the comes first,* and in London which is now, at last, about
Let St.
the
THE
OF
IN
From
Engels
when
(October
which
coincidés—in
general of
1844)
the
tenor—with
Poor,
from
|
48
°
FREDERICK
a
Scarcely
whole
crumbling,
doors
door-posts
old
of
tions,
and
paid
pools.
Here
workers
and
moral
of
deeper,
thieves
and
losing
ruin
more
separate
on
spots
the
in
Manchester
Road,
and
a curve
is
the
of
ruts
and
tions; and
the
here,
heaps
and
as
be
equalled
in
these
in
the
a
in
the
reached and
forces
the
the
by
swine
and
that
In
doors,
in the the
upon
as
if
with
the
of
beholder.
But
in all directhese,
tall
factory
children
swarm
upon
the
whole
The
rookery
windows,
mended
or
stench,
this
this the
what
garbage
as can hardly race that lives
door-posts,
which
refuse,
from
in
race
humanity.
of
old, into
of
dozen
the
a purpose, thought
are fallen
a
broken and
by
effluvia
Irk.
rotten
filth
stage
lowest line
and
in
thousand
pools
spectacle
the
sides
four
masses
thrive
short,
lies
hole,
four
and
repulsive
worst court on cottages, behind
measureless
of
women
deep
uneven,
the
the
Oxford
cottages
The
streets
smoke
ragged
puddles.
sprung
wet cellars, in sphere penned impression
poisoned by
hateful
ruinous
oulskin,
is
as
Irish. the
all
with buildings, cottages, built
about
or pavement; among standing
he
of
filthy
live
resist
end) of
all
drains
filth
horde
such
furnishes
district
sort,
darkened
A
about
have
them
without
and
which
of
atmosphere
chimneys.
in
smallest
sickening
laden
with
most
part
in
and
offal
back,
the
of
on
surrounded
the daily
to
the
rather
embankments, covered of about two hundred
to
beings, and
and
a
In
in
describe
to
of
surround-
south-west
Ireland.
or
sunk
evil
high
groups
back
human
Little
Medlock
and
factories stand two chiefly
as
in
worst
the
power
come
immediately
gather
sinking
and
I should
never
I should
side,
known
tall
dirty,
detail
yet
their
of
bein direc-
Irish,
them,
filth,
in
prostitution
of
not
surrounds
and
there in all
majority
have
the demoralising influence of want, ings. ...But the most horrible spot (if
wanting
poor,
victims the
who
which
more
daily
the
broken,
doors
the
are
walls
and
lie
the
of
together,
those
ashes
before
poorest
the
huddled
extraction,
whirlpool
emptied
live
with
loose
no doors garbage and
liquids
the
found,
or altogether are needed,
together,
where Heaps of
indiscriminately Insh
nailed
foul
be
window-frames
quarter, steal. the
stinking
and
boards
this thieves’ nothing to
can
window-pane
ENGELS
in
must
dark,
atmoreally
This
is
the
exterior
of
this
must
one
think
THE
CONDITION
when
he
hears
hundred
privy
epidemic tion
perhaps
beings
live;
that
spite
Little
1844,
asserts*
that
the
in this
in
spite
only
the
are
cellars
up with earth have now more by Irish people;
filled
once
up
constantly
wells
cellar
lying
below
loom
weaver,
had
every
morning
and
From
If
the
chapter
England
river
level,
so
bale
out
the
and
Wales
Dr.
are
and cellar
once
occupied
water clay, the
the
stopped with that its occupant,
a
his
from
all the
of
cellars
of
of
Kay
hand-
dwelling
street!
results
on a
floors
water
the
the
first
condi-
year
this
1831!
one
AGRICULTURAL
illustrates
on a large scale consequences of
hole
in
cholera
the
asin
the
of
the of
number
in
to
THE
which
reaSon
the
each
for
inaccessible
preachings
emptied
that
it into
by
a
that
the
pour
into
but
a
the
state
been
through
region,
most
average
the
usually
everything,
of
same
damp;
whole all
of
police
the
on
one
spite
at
containing
cellar,
the
excitement
almost
district
in
sanitary
Ireland,
not
in
the
of
it is in
that
houses
and
a
persons,
twenty
49
ENGLAND
pens,
these
of
and
plunged
of
grace
in
each
garret
is provided;
physicians,
in
and
IN
WORKING-CLASS
that
two rooms, a twenty human
one
THE
OF
PROLETARIAT
small
system
the
of
one,
of
Jreland
farming
exhibits
the
great mass of the population of Ireland consists of small tenants who occupy a sorry hut without partitions, and a potato patch just large enough to supply them most scantily with potatoes through the winter. In consequence of the great competition which prevails among these small tenants, the rent has reached an unheard-of
height,
England. For tenant farmer, far,
there
for
plots.
are
cultivated,
Britain
overdividing
still
and
Although and
produces
Dr.
Kay,
in in
loc.
cit./
of
Britain
Great
Ireland
Ireland
and
quadruple
labourers
in
32,000,000
14,000,000;
but
of
The
labourer seeks division of land
numbers
agricultural and
soil.
treble,
agricultural though the
remain
£150,000,000,
*
double,
every
the
products but
to
£36,000,000,
that
to
paid
in
become
a so
gone
has
competition
acres the
land
of
although
Great
value there
are
of
in
50
, . , . ,, . ,, . , ., , ., , , ,, ,, , . ,
FREDERICK
ENGELS
I re land 7 5 0 0 0 agr ic ult ura l pro le t aria ns more t han in t he ne ig hb o u r ing is la nd * H o w grea t t he c ompe t it ion f o r land in I re la nd m u s t b e is e v iden t f rom t his e x t ra ord ina r y disprop
.,
-
ort ion espec ia lly w h e n one re f lec t s t ha t t h e la b o u rers in G rea t B r it a in are liv ing m t he u t mos t dis t ress T he conse q u enc e o f t his c ompe t it io n is t ha t it is imposs ible f o r t he t enant s t o liv e m u c h b e tt er t h an t h e l a b o urers b y reason o f t h e hig h ren t s p a id T he Ir is h peop l e is t h u s he ld in crus hing po v ert y f rom w hic h it c anno t f ree it s e lf u nd er o u r presen t soc ia l con d it ions T hese peop le liv e in t he mos t w re t c h e d c la y hut s scarce ly goo d e no u g h f or ca tt le pens h a v e scan t f oo d a ll w int er lo ng or as t he report a b o v e q u o t e d e x presses it t he y ha v e po t a t oes h a lf eno u g h t hirt y w ee k s in t h e y e ar and t h e res t o f t h e y ea r no t hing W h en t h e t ime c om es in t h e on spring a t w hic h t h is pro v is i reac hes it s end or c an no longer b e use d b eca use o f it s spro ut ing w if e and c hildren go f o r t h t o b e g an d t ra mp t h e c o un t ry w it h t h e ir k e tt le in t h e ir l e t he hus b a nd h and s M ea n w hi a f t e r p la nt ing po t a t oes f or t h e ne x t y ear goes in searc h o f w or k e it her in Ire land or Eng l an d an d re t urns a t t h e po t a t o ha rv es t t o his f am ily T his is t h e con dit ion in w hic h nine t ent hs o f t h e Ir is h c o u n t r y f o lk s liv e T he y are poor as c h urc h m ic e w ear t he mos t w re t c h e d rags and s t a nd u pon t h e lo w es t p lane o f in t e l ligence poss ible in a ha lf c iv ilis e d co u nt ry A c c o r d ing t o t h e report q uo t e d t h ere are in a pop u la t ion o f 8 !/9 m illions
, , , , . ,. , ,
-
-
-
585 000
hea d s
of
f am i l i es
in
,
-
a s t a te
o f t ot a l
on; d es t i t ut i
and
a cc ord ing t o o t her a ut h orit ies c it e d b y S heriff A lison * * t here are in Ire la nd 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 persons w h o co uld no t liv e w it h o u t p u blic or pr iv a t e a ss is t ance — or 27 pe r cen t o f t he w ho le pop u la t ion pa upers ! T he ca u se o f t h is po v ert y lie s in t he e x is t ing so c ia l con dit ions espec ia lly in c ompe t it ion he re f o u nd in t he f orm o f t he s ubdiv is ion o f t he so il M uc h e ff ort ha s b een spent in f ind ing o t h er ca uses It h as b een a ssert e d t h a t t h e re la t ion o f t he t enant t o t he landlord w h o le t s his es t a t e in large
lo t s
* Session
Report of 1837
** nection
to
Archibald with
t enant s
of the ].
Poor
Alison,
Human
w ho
Law The
Happiness,
aga in
.
ha v e
Commission Principles Vol.
11,
of
t h e ir
on
Ireland
Population,
London,
-
sub t enant s
,
and
[Parliamentary and
1840.—Ed.
their
Con-
THE
CONDITION
THE
OF
sub-sub-tenants,
between
the
asserted
that
right
expropriating
of
rent
duly,
this
law
landlord the
determines
even years
children
improved in
assertion English
and
the
rapid
who
now
die
Church
forced
upon
what
six
the
Or the
a a
shillings
trouble. this
of
is
takes
head.
again
their
1s
It
improve-
few
population.
of
not
but
of
the the
by
cause
the
the
of
the
of
the
on
laid nation;
Besides,
a
in
up under consequence side comes
poverty,
the Protestant but divide among
them,
from
what
holdings
From another oppression inflicted
blame Catholic
Church
and
lost
in
this
manifests
slight
grow
to
his that
all
himself
increase
live
the
paid
But
upon any
be
then
the
itself.
Irish
would
early childhood. that the shameless
poverty
reach
pay,
cause of the earlier appearance
is
somewhat
the
rent to take place
conditions
poverty
landowner
been
landlord,
thetpoverty live
of
have
the
poverty.
not
would
has
landlord
may
pay
this
a
the
who
to
which
no
might
gives
could
consequence
in
The
in
tenant
small
had
which
all
form
majority
they
if
ment
the The
follows?
which
come
middlemen
cultivator—it
cultivator
for
the
ten
actual
fails
51
ENGLAND
often
law
the
blame
only
Make
itself.
the
tenant
first
to
is
and
that
shameful
the
if
so
turn,
in
IN
WORKING-CLASS
tithes
and
are
it
a
not
does
upon may
tax
upon the tenant, though he nominally pay them; now, since the Commutation Bill of 1838,8 the landlord pays the tithes directly and reckons so much higher rent, so that the tenant is none the better off. And in the same way a hundred other causes of this poverty are brought forward, all proving as little as these. This poverty is the result of our social conditions; apart from these, causes may be found for the manner in which property,
landed
it
manifests
their in
manifests
is
Otherwise,
owing
historical their
not
but
itself,
poverty
That
not
whole
to
the
for
in
itself
the
The
to
are
Latin
its
existence.
thus
the
of
Irish
the
of
Ireland
character
development. character
fact
and
people,
a
and
people
not to
related
to
nations,
the
French, and especially to the Italians. The bad features of their character we have already had depicted by Carlyle.9 Let
us
the
truth
Teutonic
now
hear
than
an
Irishman,
Carlyle,
character:
with
at least prejudice
who
his
comes in
nearer
favour
of
to the
52
FREDERICK
are
“They impatient,
restless, yet improvident;
and
renounce
revenge
to
quick
reflection,
indolent, clever brave by instinct,
friendships,
and
indiscreet, stormy, without much
and
generous
to
insults,
forgive
with
gifted
genius
ENGELS
make
prodigally,
to
and
sparingly
with
judgement.’’*
With
must
the
bow
Irish,
and
feeling
before
Their
sensuous,
and
quiet,
persevering
reflection
reaching
development—such
as
agriculture, that.
and
With
here
now
division
small
capital
of
to
according bring
the
England, produce
own
be
thankful
attempts
The
present
are
These
are
the
the
English of
with
the
most
the in
to
the
the
order
the
the
of
the
landlords’
hand,
are
crimes
*
The
**
ever
before
ownership;
directly
edition
or of
Small-scale
since the that
the
Middle
Ages.
Revolution. it
indirectly,
1892.
London,
agriculture
|
took
to
The
away the
from
peasants.
the
of
into
which have
will
little
for
the
1807;
had
are
2nd
the thing
feudal
[Added
ed.,
up
and
1821.
of
Such
West.
On
Pamphlet.
prevailing form of peasant farm existed
latter lords
by
made
the
small the
servants,
families.
South
been
districts, immediate
obedient
farms
crimes.
of
most
the
their
from
agricultural
ejected
of
the
civilisation,
form
their
large
Thus
only
to
fertility
immigration
the
the
in
frequent
Ireland,
of
State
Mistake.
farming
even
especially
in
or
Protestant intruders, whose potato patches of hundreds
the
of
themselves
against
agents,
would,
immigration,
they
take
day
directed
time
immigration.
save
to
Irish
by
sterling
leaven
future,
English
one
always
a
Rhine,
plundering
their
England
results
the
by
of
not
it
Irish
brutal
Irish,
even were
investment
state
The
nearly
enemies,
the
pounds
high
to
from
and
standard
of
on
ruin,
by of;
the
furnished
its
to
which
soil
very
the
for
fast
which
existed
million
England.
while
have
the
not
held
on
have
from
unfit
plane
land,
raised
itself and
they
thought
120
the
in
have
people;
and
to
utterly
and
but of
activity
lowest
of
France
be
require
up
contented
Irish
to
Alison,
might
in
is
the
estates,**
not
attained
which
as
improvement
soil
already
has
great
an was
immemorial,
upon
nature
excitable
Hence
subdivisions
created,
of
nation
conducted.
remained
the
artificially
the
a
reason
predominate;
them.
prevents
manufacture
passion
Engels
changed and
in
was
its
transferred,
the
German
THE
CONDITION
the
other
THE
OF
hand,
agitation England.!9
IN
WORKING-CLASS
the
Insh
hope
53
ENGLAND
for
relief
means
by
of
the
repeal of the Legislative Union with all the foregoing, it is clear that the uneducated Irish must see in the English their worst enemies; and their first hope of improvement in the conquest of national independence. But quite as clear is it, too, that Irish distress cannot be removed by any Act of Repeal. Such an Act would, however, at once lay bare the fact that the cause of
Irish
whether
has
readily,
nell’s
trial!
more
and
Friedrich der
had
the
to
come
from
Meanwhile,
it is
an open
the
Engels,
the been
known
book: Die
Repeal the in
of
Lage
1845
is
question necessary to
be
neither
Chartism
nor
Ireland. Ireland
Agitation
means
will
abroad,
of
making
at
this
point
the
1843
and
O’Con-
the
Irish
distress
Germany.
Printed
Klasse
Leipzig,
repeal
Hitherto,
success in observations upon
as
more
of
Irish.
marked
! have
arbettenden
in England,
to
my
more
in
seems
accomplishment
close
P ublished
at home.
clear
Socialism
now
which
found
the this
I
the From
misery,
to be
really make
for
to
the
according authonised
English London,
edition,
1892
Frederick
From
[THE
THE
In
COMMERCIAL
CHARTIST
the
meantime
terrible
convulsions.
beggars,
the
Poor
Tax,
ransack the
and
ENGLAND—
2]
is
people
are are
were
still
most with
the
overflowing to pay
in
the
of
in
the
refusing
gather
cattle-sheds who
writhing
*
their
to
not
die
even of a short
and
farmers
sacred
to
thousands them
ago. It
looks
calmly
next
as
though
an average far this year
is
arriving This
will
become
present government
the
in
and that
crisis
to
grant
last
winter.
220,000.
it such
reforms
would
an uproar of a most
K.
Reforme,
October
*
26,
Headings of
Marx
set
Moscow,
in
square
Marxism-Leninism
in
brackets
have
Moscow.—Ed.
been
the
to
workers
it compelled
Collected
1847
345
all surprising
important
newspaper
the
at
that
is estimated the number increased
between be
immigration
September,
figure
not
as
hunger
of
Irish
In
this
October
competition
and
caused
will
alarming each day. It Irish arrive each year;
in the
stronger,
did
over
already
daily
means
511.
Published
1s
Irish
they
getting more of 50,000
England
that
so were
the
as
winter
to
tute
and
priests,
Catholic
time
La
hungry
barns
Ireland
The workhouses property owners
the
IN
CRISIS
MOVEMENT-—IRELAND!
starving
ruined
the
Engels
provided
if
the
nature.
and
F.
Engels,
Works,
1976,
by
Vol.
p.
the
309
Inst1-
6,
Frederick
{THE
The day. of
Insh
The
the
the and
THE
Lord has
powers
Tipperary
with
applied
to
and
Waterford,
Clare,
and
Longford
It
to
measure
will
over
last
force
slow
which
several
in
taking
this
new
law
the
counties
baronies
in
advantage invests
him;
Limerick
of
the
Roscommon,
Wednes-
counties
Leitrim,
of
Cavan,
County.14
seen
be
be.
*
into
not
all
Cork,
King’s
remains
came
was
Lieutenant
been
IRELAND
FOR
CHARTISTS]
Bill! 3
Coercion
despotic
Act
BILL
COERCION
AND
Engels
In
what
this
the
effect
we
connection
this
of
already
odious have
the
measure was taken, namely, the Irish landowners. They announce to the world in their organs that the measure will have no effect whatsoever. And in order to achieve this a whole country 1s being placed in a state of siege! To achieve this nine-tenths opinion
of
the
the
of
Irish
This During
a
discussion
Bill,
outright
a * **
also
put
borough
Daniel A
the
deserted the
the
their
outskirts
support only
Wakley, of
general
one.
family
itself
on
not
homeland, only
several
for
the
supported
the
member
Chartist
who
demanded
O’Connell.—Ed.
mistake
in
La
Reforme;
it
should
read
voted
occasions.
voted
twenty
London,
deceased
their
who the
the
of
O’Connell,
and
Mr.
a
O’Connell
members
Bill,
country!
been
two faithful to
in its
by
the
Maurice,
Morgan
the
of
forward
has
Bill
eighteen
on
interests
remained spoke
only
rejection
amendment for
but
have
and
cousin,**
were
There
of
sons,
their
the
whose
desertion
John
‘“Liberator’s”*
for
The
fact.
divided:
whereas
in
representatives
is the
became
class
“brother’.—Ed.
56
FREDERICK
that
the
Bill
Coercion
should
measures aimed at reducing was proposed to repress. twenty voters there were two out
and that
Irishmen the
of
hundred
Ireland
great ment
agitator Mr. the
after
the
in
debate
in
Feargus
whom
succeeded
was
he
who
was
it
the
which
none
The
he
of
Irish
simple
allow
them
But
possibly
do
are
they Ireland,
word
trying they
are
to
in
leader
up
was
it
he
hin;
the
it
voting
up
summed the
they
Biull;
and
fundamentally
He
O’Connor.
repeal
for
will
not
as a means
to when the latter come to who support repeal cannot
favour
like
undermine
to
about
time
campaign
“repeal’?
obliged
against
Mr.
members
a
Bill;
speeches
hearts
of of
Tories
Irish
without
heart
energy
the
leader
since 1835 reintroUnion,!*> a motion would have put forward. this leader with a bad grace.
accepted
the
formidable
the
of
members
using
leading
of
a
in
evident
behind
held
in his
first
Repeal
their
go on
the
who
the
in
very
the
who
for
Irish
capable found
opposition
who
democratic
overthrowing
the
opposition
for
became
Coercion
the
members
to
the
clause,
he
acknowledged
are
of
the
Whigs
the
power.
was
Parlia-
of
happy to make the O’Connor’’, put himself single bound. It was he who
of
all
each
it
motion
detest
forget
rallying
arguments
the
duced
for
in
of
the
of
F.
a
rejection
opposed
had
death
place
opening
soon
it
‘‘We
in
the
Parlia-
question
the
democratic
Mr.
of
party
Inish
possible;
finaliy
As
a present
outright
who
all
said,
O’Connell
the
This
in
opposition
the
tacitly
he
has
since
was not
he
that
it
meaning
serious
take
to
Up
which
important
held
But
that
more,
is
an
been
O’Connor.
Daniel
whenever
begun
what
English Chartists at the head of the proposed
had
Ireland
would
successor.
had
and,
been who
Ireland.
father’s
party
rival
had
decide
O’Connell
his
on
crimes
boroughs,
up
put
discussion
leading
John
as
Ireland
to
the
by
these eighteen and five English Radicals
which
who
accompanied
of
English
dozen
which
was
It
O’Connell.
causes
the
members
a
be
And among also four or
representing
ment there were only to the Bill. This was the first affecting
also
ENGELS
his
submit
of
the
O’Connor
growing
to his
Whigs
and,
and
although
popularity
leadership
in
in
Parlia-
ment.
When
the
parliamentary
session
is
over
O’Connor
will
THE
CONDITION
OF
go
probably
on
repeal
and
to
doubt
that
if
the
leader
uniting his
he
this
will
British
leave
democracy
are
swelled
people
before
will by
advance
two
million
Ireland
step
liberation.
Published
La
,, in
her
the
R e f orme
J anuary
8
1848
newspaper
will
There
at
than
the
of
agitation
doing
less
position
can
this six
three
which
him.
to our readers between the
poverty-stricken towards
in
leadership
held
it
the
party. in
successful
a
has
revive
Chartist
occupy
alliance
future
ranks
is
57
ENGLAND
to
Ireland
Irish
Irish
will
O’Connell,
We
of
O’Connor
democratic
hands,
even
a tour an
the
IN
WORKING-CLASS
found
of
the
THE
he
for
be
no
will
be
months.
By
kingdoms!
no c
® in not
agitator,
to judge the importance of peoples of the two islands.
more
much brave
last
and
have
K.
Marx
ardent
when Irish,
an
taken
and
important
F.
Engels
W ork s
Vol
197 6
its and
. , , , ,.
Col lec t e d M osco w
quickly
pp
6
-
44 5 47
Frederick
FEARGUS
The
an
to
address
known leader in Parliament.
to
ning
our
end
AND
O’CONNOR
first
issue
of
the
Irish
of
and
THE
IRISH
PEOPLE!
Star'® for 1848 Feargus O’Connor,
Northern
people
by
English address
carefully
space
restricted
The
the This
Engels
?
contains the
well-
Chartists
and
deserves
to
their representative be read from begin-
considered
by
every
us
prevents
democrat,
reproducing
from
it in
but
full.
our duty if we were to pass it over m silence. The consequences of this forceful appeal to the Irish people will very soon be strongly felt and seen. Feargus O’Connor, himself of Irish descent, a Protestant and for over ten years a leader and main pillar of the great labour movement in England, must henceforth be regarded as We
the
would,
virtual
chief
His
reform.
however,
published
him
first
the
tinued
is just
being
the
of
Union,
that
able
posts private In
his
O’Connell,
deceived Repeal’.
business that them
of
Irish
and
the
Irish
cause
Ireland
needs.
Ireland.
his
the
Bill
con-
friends
that
Feargus
about
the
and
well-
abolition
an mdependent a pretext for
not
the
subsequently
shows
of
of
against
given
Repeal—the
word,
advocates have
concerned
achievement and
and
Commons
Coercion
status,
an empty
himself
address
Repealers!9 House
seriously
in
the
not
in
this
indeed
is,
for
the
man
the
millions
Parliament—is
ing
for
is
Irish
in
to
claim
O’Connor
remiss
disgraceful
agitation
O’Connor
the
of
speeches
recently
be
for
of
the Irish
obtain-
making
profit-
that
Daniel
transactions. he
shows
the
Irish
people
political juggler, led them by for thirteen years by means
the of
nose the
and word
O' C O NNO R
F EA R G U S
A ND
I RI SH
THE
59
PE O PLE
true light the conduct of John O’Connell, who has taken up his father’s political heritage and who like his father is prepared to sacrifice millions of credulous Irishmen for the sake of his personal ventures and interests. All .O’Connell’s speeches at the Dublin Conciliation Hall? 9° He
shows
and
all
will
not
his
its
hypocritical
obliterate
earlier
and
during
in
in
the
protestations
the
disrepute
now
particular
on
debates
the
Irish
then
he
has
brought
in
the
House
upon of
himself
Commons
Bill.
Coercion
who
Irish
purses and John political rogue, will be their
If
were
this
especially For
a
address
it.
But
as an
which
shows
might
and
all.
contained,
we
first
is
of
in
it
much
not
English
wider
even
not
have
importance. Irishman
as a
Chartist.
most obtuse must fight with
the
people
association
and
as an
democrat,
Irish
close
papist
should
only
escape
cannot that the
in
fanatical of
it
speaks
primarily,
O’Connor
their
out
kicked
the
lucidity
the
O’Connell,
O’Connor
and
With
mind,
all
mentioned
Feargus also,
all
phrases
beautiful
people must and will see how things stand, and it will kick out the entire gang of so-called Repealers, under cover of this cloak laugh up their sleeves and in
The
but
and
with
the
English
working classes and the Chartists in order to win the six points of the People’s Charter—annual parliaments, universal suffrage, vote by ballot, abolition of the property qualification for members of Parliament, payment of M.P.s and the establishment
are won
points
equal
of
will
electoral
the
achievement
advantages for Ireland. Furthermore O’Connor has
a
already
petition
now
been
which
districts.
points
demanded
received
earlier
3%
the
of
these
after
Only
Repeal
any
have
out
that
justice
for
by
the
English
workers
million
signatures,*!
six
Ireland and
in
that
the
English Chartists have again protested against the Coercion Bill in numerous petitions and that the oppressed classes in England and Ireland must at last fight
Irish
together the
ence
same on There
and
conquer
oppression the privileged
can
Irish people Chartists and
be
no
will will
act
together and live in and ruling doubt
that
or
to languish
continue
the same capitalist
misery class.
henceforth
the
and
mass
under dependof
the
unite ever more closely with the English with them according to a common plan.
60 —
As the
a
result
the
liberation
That
is
the
+
—_«-
victory
FREDERICK
the
of
Ireland,
of
significance
will
of
Fnglish be
democrats,
hastened
-Z et tung
., in
No
-
,
sse ler De ut sc he B ri 3
J anuary
9
-
18 4 8
by
and
K
.
to
years.
the
Irish
., ., , , ,.
Marx
C ol l ec t e d
M osc o w
hence
many
address
O’Connor’s
people.
P ubl i s he d
ENGELS
oo:
and
F
Enge ls
W or k s
1976
V ol
p
6
-
44 8 4 9
Karl
From
[THE
SPEECH
ON
FEBRUARY
Marx
THE
POLISH
22,
QUESTION,
¢
184822]
the
The Cracow revolution has given a glorious whole of Europe, by identifying the national
the
democratic
cause
and
the
has
been
emancipation
of
to
example
cause
the
with
oppressed
class. If
this
bloody
revolution
hands
triumphantly
of
hired
assassins
in
Switzerland
stifled
it 1s and
the
for
now
Italy.
rising It
sees
tion of these principles in Ireland, where nationalist party has gone to its grave with where the new national party is above all democratic. 2 3
Published
in
a
Célébration,
du
deuxteme
de
la
du
22
the
Bruxelles,
K.
Marx
Bruxelles,
Collected
anniversaire
Moscow,
Polonaise
Révolution Février
collection
1846,
1848
moment by the gloriously and the
confirma-
the narrowly O’Connell, and reforming and
and
F,
Engels,
Works,
1976,
Vol.
p.
549
6,
Frederick
From
Cologne,
arrived,
as
June
the
as
far
10.
are
there
IN
COLOGNE
The
were
fields
Engels
lovely
green,
people
DANGER24
holiday
trees
the
who
of
Whitsuntide
had
were
blossoming
and
dative
the
the
confuse
with
preparations were made to pour out the holy reaction over all lands in a single day.25 The moment is well chosen. In Naples guard lieutenants Swiss mercenaries have succeeded in drowning the young
accusative,
spirit and
of
hberty
in
the
capitalists and
appomts
England
on
and
thrown
the
General
Guizot
Hédtel
people’s
fetters
gaol
In
dragoons.*®
In
France,
by
means
Perrot,
masses
and
the
triumvirate
and
the
superiority the
of
Published
No.
in
11,
June
null
the
entire
the
Rheinische 11,
blow and
and
the
by
blow
the by
are
dispersed
by
itself
Federal
rejected.
through
Prince
of
In
Repealers
are
blessed
Fifty?’
at the
Vincennes.
Assembly
of
void
nation’’.2
and
of
laws
shooting of
meetings
National
assembly Draconic
the
Chartists
which
drumming,
revolution
of
Committee
winning
and
“property
Neue
is
an of
commandant
the
Frankfurt
proposed
Right
ordered
unarmed
appoints
the
who
23,
February
Ireland
into
blood.
Republic
now Diet
In
Berlin
numerical
Prussia
moving
back
K.
and
declares into
the
8
Marx
Zeitung
Collected
1848
Moscow,
F.
Engels,
Works, 1976,
Vol.
p.
68
7,
Karl
From THE
Marx
ELECTIONS—
DUCHESS
OF
FINANCIAL
CLOUDS—
AND
SUTHERLAND
SLAVERY?
?
r
process
The
have 16th,
17th
plains
it
of
Ireland
it
ston,
is
some
exactly
any
If of literally
of
of
British
in
this
ago
accompanied
property
the
into
to
process may
middle
class—in
favour
private
their
were
see
sense
Published
in
Tribune
to The No.
9,
1853,
Paper
March
12,
1853
rose
where
the
3687,
No.
in in
by
English
a
lawyer law
the
nobility
favour
enriched
case
it
was
class the
Feudal
of
or
titles
services
of
of last Pro-
deed
concerm-
in
England,
lawyers, in
the
what
servile
Mistory
every
in wealth, either
And
and
feudal
are
property—these
possessions.
an
the
of
the
of
middle
themselves,
interpreted
in
in
people.
New-York,
and
and
Palmer-
property
his
murder,
performed
from
nobility—in
People’s
February
The
the
hostile
Datly
class
Scotland,
of
comwas
above.
by
century, Dalrymple, who, in his perty, 30 very naively proves that ing property was interpreted by when
19th,
Viscount
men
described
It
the
was true that it was robbery, it property of the British aristocracy. property, robbery of commons, fraudu-
Church
you
the
of
of
already
century.
noble
cleared
in
the
of
latter
The
we
Scotland,
England
16th
beginning
the
aristocrats
lawyers,
the
progress.
manner property it ever in
transformation,
patriarchal
in
full
years
true
Robbery lous
in
in Morus
the
of
in
out
Thomas
begmning
Scotland
which,
carried
centuries.
the
now
is
too,
Ireland,
18th
in in
performed
was
described,
and
estates
clearing
of
now
just
Printed of
in
45,
and
of
The
according New-York
verified
The
with
People’s
to
the
Daily the
Paper
text
text Tribune
a
Karl
From
FORCED
MAZZINI—THE
the
years
1851
the
total
to
and
home usual
gold
and
to
published
of
exports
£71,429,548
in
trade
and
in
Feb.
amounted 1852;
of
navigation
we
last,
to
the
see
for that
£68,531,601
latter
amount,
silver.
The
Colonial
retum
of
Ireland,
to
30,
relating
the export of cotton, wool, linen and silk The quantity of zmports for 1852 is below year 1851. The proportion of imports entered consumption not having diminished, but rather it follows that England has re-exported, instead of quantity of colonial produce, a certain amount of
increased, the
ENGLAND—MR.COBDEN
1852,
value
QUESTION—ELECTION
go to
£47,209,000 manufactures. that for the for
and
declared
1851,
in
IN
accounts
the
AND
EMIGRATION—KOSSUTH REFUGEE
BRIBERY
From
Marx
the
all
Land
Emigration
emigration
parts
of
the
from
world,
Office
gives
England,
from
Jan.
the
following
Scotland,
1,
1847
and
to June
1852:
Year
1847 1848 1849 1850 1851
....... ....... ....... ....... ....... .....
1852 (till June) Total
English
Scotch
Irish
Total
34,685
8,616
214,969
258,270
58,865
11,505
177,719
248,089.
73,613
17,127
208,758
299,498
57,843
15,154
207,852
280,849
69,557
18,646
247,763
335,966
40,767
| 11,562
143,375
195,704
1,200,436
1,618,376
335,330
82,610
FORCED
EMIGRATION,
remarks
“Nine-tenths,”’
are
pool
to be
assumed
are
Scotland
65
ETC.
the
Irish.
either
Celts,
emigrants
three-fourths
the
from
the
‘‘of
Office,
About
the
of
or
Highlands,
Liver-
from
emigrants Ireland
from
from
through
Glasgow.”
Nearly four-fifths of the whole emigration are, accordingly, to be regarded as belonging to the Celtic population of Ireland and of the Highlands and islands tof Scotland. The London
Economist
“It is founded
on
says on
consequent small
of
the
Highlands
of
Scotland
improvement....
from
the
taken
place.
famine
£4,281,999,
when
with
there
they
have
sum
and down
by
Political employs of
real
a
from
net
the
rents
The
King*)
supposing the
population entity,
“the
3-226
George
in
and
every that
the
kind
any
in
amounted
of
degree
has
since to
1851
in
1843.”
a country,
of
that
it
twelve
King
“Is
and
(at
alone
automatic
net
the
that
in
the
real
income
the
same,
it
from
ten
Sismondi,
answers,
politique,>2 matter, the
he
Ricardo,
derived
millions.
in
capitalist whether
says
The
”’
is
a
of him
not,”
remaining
whether
from
profits to
similar?
profits,
the
English
disappearance
is in
no milhis
that, nation of
the
it
was
no
Queen,
midst
of
the
island, him to
time
machinery
enabled
amount of Net Revenue now produced by a of twenty millions. Indeed, that grammatical national wealth’’, would in this case not be
diminished.
*
emigration
it matter
men?
nation
and
or
does
1,000
remaining
only
procure
the
annual
what
a
of
population,
a
but
to
suffered
inhabitants
Nouveaux principes d’économie according to this view of the would not be interested at all whole
not
Ireland
of
preliminary
revenue greater than
£184,000
consideration people
of
or her
pauperising
income of
lions
1846-47,
about
population has
of society adds: “‘The
and
is no more profit to be ground out of them, when grown a burden to the revenue, drive them away, up your Net Revenue! Such is the doctrine laid Ricardo m his celebrated work, The Principles of
nation,
subject
Ireland
of
contrary,
Economy.3! to £2,000, 100 men or
amounting “the
of the
system
breaking down of the and potato cultivation’;
revenue
being
Begin
an
is
emigration:
part of the indispensable
redundant
The On
the
holdings
departure
this
of
III.—Ea.
66
KARL
a
In
letter
former
estates tinues to
be
may
from
in
of
see
the
I have
Highlands
of
upon
forced
the
an
given
instance That
Scotland.
Ireland
by
clearing
conyou
emigration
same
the
quotation
following
the
of
MARX
process The
from
Galway
Mercury: people are The landlords
‘“The
Ireland.
all the smaller extermination daily
is
practised
passing away from the land in Connaught are tacitly combined
fast of
occupiers, against whom being waged.... The most in
this
province,
a
West of weed out
to
regular systematic war heart-rending cruelties
which
of
the
the
are
public
not
of
are
at
all
aware.”
But Erin* by
is
not
of
the
it and
agricultural
the
the
pauperised
Highlands
of
system
agricultural
and
by
society’’.
of
inhabitants
labourers
the
1s
It
only
England,
from
of
which
farms
no
especially
other
would
enable
alternative
country
those
prospects for capital to make
bad
sufficient
and
of
the
able-
Wales,
and
Emigration now seizing
the
farmers,
with
the Is
away
most stationary class in England. A startmovement has sprung up among the smaller
another class, ling emigration English
Green
down
“breaking
not
Lower Scotland, whose passages are paid by Commissioners. The wheel of * ‘improvement”’
who,
of
are swept
that
Scotland
improvements,
antiquated
bodied
only
emigration
caused
compulsory
emigration
tion of farms, introduction of
by
the
harvest,
soils, in want
great improvements on to pay their old rents,
gold
sea
the
not
in
by
and
search but
have
a new
of
of
the
only
of
the
concentra-
landlordism,
machinery to the of agriculture
of
their
now
speaking
mania,*>3
produced
application the modern
clay
the
cross I am
lands.
heavy
coming
them
to
but
new
of
holding
the
system
soil,
and
on a great
scale. In
the
ancient
emigration,
ment
of
assuming colonies,
society.
The
certain
limits
not
be
antique
*
States,
the
formed
in
shape
a
whole
system
to
numbers
the
surpassed
without
civilisation
itself.
Treland.—Ed.
Greece
of
regular
those
of of
the
and
the link
Rome,
periodical
States
why
structure
of
was
founded
on
population,
was
the it
establish-
the
in
endangering But
compulsory
so?
which
could
condition Because
of
the
ON EM I G RA T I
FO R C E D
application
, . to
science
of
unknown to them. To remain few. Otherwise bodily
drudgery
on
disturbed. It was to
that
the
a
under tribes,
space
for
tribes
in
North-America. each
other’s
population
was
migratory
movements
peoples
a power
and
not
population
power
productive Now regards
that
I “‘Net
that
must
populations complaint,
nor
from
as
industry, is
Society submitted
existences houses
it
master
the
breaks
subverts.
new
a
be
anything
views
of
those
1s
The
more
Economists
surplus
adventurous
the
the
of
or
would
than classes of
puerile,
of
revolution,
no
more
an
races,
the
more believe
give all
as
much who, in
his
retain
the
the
of
science
human
regards
too
way.
short-sighted, in
is
Republic. +4 which must be
notice
must
it
his
earthquake
and life,
It
so
proscribe
from
popula-
Ricardo, who whom entire
to
forcibly
poets
of
emigration.
power;
of
and
stands
power
increase
without even of Sismondi,
silent
who
the
diminution famine
agriculture
takes
down
large they
foundation
opinion Moloch
expelled
conditions
there
3°
of
Plato
undergoing to, and which it
a
the the
philanthropy, methods
war-
numbers
Thus
it
by
be sacrificed, in the opinion
hypochondriacal superannuated
in
they
Indian
presses on productive presses on population. as
there,
emigration the case want of productive
surplus
share neither Revenue”
of
Europe.
demands
the
plains
the
great
the
population;
which
of
acted
with
in
those
laid
compulsory it is not the
away
drives
case
the
undertake
surplus
high
powers
barbarians
production.
modern
the
cause
augmenting of
the
remain
now
which
and
creates
productive is
to
with modern opposite. Here
which tion,
field
on
pastoral, hunting, production required a
is
By
forced
ancient
of
But
as
citizenship not to be
were
They manner of
a
into
renfedy.
same
To
few.
individual,
made numbers
from
The
form.
citizen
free
the only population
World.
Old
in
barbanans
different
whose
every
curtailed
quite
the
to remain
forced
waging
power
drove
invade
although
were
of productive certain proportion of
utterly
they were forced to had to submit to the
the
was
was
production
transformed
Forced emigration the same pressure
production, Asia
a
material
remain civilised they would have
which
want
slave. The dependent
67
ET C
earnest
weak
the
to
But
can
than
the
that
this
68
KARL
the
acquisitive
propensities In
money-lords?
most
centrates
The
clears
the
‘‘No
land
assisted
by
Paisley
the
Emigration
and
modern
The
and
process
is
to
science it
con-
“have
been
but
Economist,
a
except
or none
few
landlords that
of
mhabitants,
Commissioners,
weavers,
hand-loom
to
society
towns. says
workmen,’
both
of
its
of
manufacturing
manufacturing
adapting
working
application
the in
but
capitalists,
of
3
people
nothing
Britain
Great
transparent.
production
means
state
transitory
woeful
MARX
have
few
and
Spitalfields
at
emigrated
own
their
expense.”
The
Economist
at
emigrate class
not
tion,
proletariat,
finds
itself
productive been forces,
to
will
the
be
modern the
in
which
tenant,
numberless
what
does
to art
and
women;
landlord
and
the
“rights
the
its
Scotch
they
will
whole
it will The
property’.
down
the
appropriation.
of
clansman, the in
the
Irish
hand-loom
generations
expropriate,
to
according
broken
yeoman,
English
Where
Then,
have,
modes
these
before?
of
themselves, and
prevent
will
Nowhere!
production
of
hitherto
appropriating
appropriated
the
society the
and
great
the
has
Who
and the
produc-
around
creation
them?
handicrafts,
children
of
due
factory
time,
the
cotton-lord.
the Continent heaven is fulminating, but in England itself is trembling. England is the country where the
the
earth
real
revulsion
of
in
Tribune
March
22,
in
People’s 16,
been
expropriated
weaver,
April
have
the of
and
The
middle
modern
of
labourers.
further,
Economists
cottier
Daily
to
Now,
not
could
industrial
centres, of
step
appeal
system
have
the
resisting
of
in
Bourgeois
Published
they
the
working
history
of
they
power use to
antiquated
On
that
mighty
whose
a
changes
They
that
emigrating.
very
gathered
going
no
of
in
the
martyrology
from
be
them
by
forces,
the
them
assist
well
The rural population, the most stationary element of modern society, disappears while
this lead? conservative industrial
own
their
would
very expense, and
knows
The No.
1853,
1853
modern
society
New-York
3722,
Printed of
and
Paper
begins.
and
No.
50,
of
The
according New-York
verified
The
with
People’s
to
the
Daily the
Paper
iext
text Tribune
Karl
THE
INDIAN
Marx
TENANT
QUESTION-—IRISH
RIGHT
r
London,
The India
on
to
27th
When
that
the
shall
on
observations As
the
the
of
23rd,
inst.,
on
not
has
been
the
as so
and
Commons
the
other
nicely
a close. to resume my
on
to
support
the
parties
balance
and
each
of
composing
the
other
the
that
turn the scales which way they please, concessions are at last about to be made to the Irish tenants. The ‘‘Leasing powers (Ireland) Bill’’, which passed
the
any
all
to
24th,
brought
depends
1853
respect
with
continued
Ministry2®©
Coalition
may at some
motion
Stanley’s
at length have arrived, I intend the Indian question.35
party,
Irish
House Irish
Lord
commenced
adjoumed
the
on
debate
28,
June
moment
House
of
that
for
the
separable
from
the
soil,
tion
his
of
tenant
at to
being
respect
with
them shall be the tenant.37
tenant
A
another,
ment
in of
manure, cultural
the
will
by
and either
or indirectly purposes, in
be very tenant,
take
contract
by
having directly
last,
on
made shall
at
the
the
soil,
his
by
construction
the
termina-
the
the in
effected
while
landlord
one an
irrigation, of
and
incoming
valuation,
capital,
thus
soil
compensation
between
a
contains the
at
have,
money,
in
them in
incorporated
land, soi,
buildings
form
for
and
or
improvedrainage, for
agri-
steps the landlord with demand for tenant concede, he has to pay the own money to the landlord. If he resist, he unceremoniously ejected, and supplanted by a the latter being enabled to pay a higher rent by
increased rent. interest for his
new
to
improvements
having the
the
liberty
arranged
Friday
improvements
tenant compensation
a
lease,
on
Commons
provision
If
the
K A RL
70
very
the in
expenses turn,
his
replaced
way not
has
Class
same
of
absentee
merely
the
tions,
each
in
social
the
by
way,
predecessors,
landlords
labour,
but
generation scale,
his
until
an improver of the or put on worse terms.
become
the
in
a
incurred
also
exactly
been
the
In
to
he
became
taxed
was
He
a
by
this
Irish
may may
are a
take be
it
outlay
so
before
the
proper
the
the
assurance
Where capitalists
who
commerce,
in
doubt but long leases
that
for
time
nearly
this
Ireland—a
us see
Let
or state
in
attempts
the
of
of
soil
manner
what
to
of
right
break
down
occupation.
farm
course
his the
term.
run
not
of
a tenant
Either
a fixed number of years, or his upon certain notice. In the first
all
his
of
should of
the
land
obviously
or
all, he
industry,
improvements
leader,
systems
any
at
expiration
that
the
charges.
general
be
that
in
to to
but
by in
Celtic
left
oppose
proclaimed
but
the
of
he
Right’’38:
of
would
was
and
to
and
negligent,
alternative
himself
and
industry
and
faults
other
order
Saturday’s
two
lease
In
soil
cost its
terminable
events,
obvious
in
in
““Tenant
‘“There
no
pauperise
Right’’
tenant, not effected at his Times,
“aboriginal
negligence.
“Tenant
inert
lower
and that of enterprising,
very
his
of
grew
he
accordingly,
the
The
the
pauper—to
pauperise things,
with
had,
become
contrary,
the
reproached
race’.
consequence
in
on
If,
genera-
grade
made for the raising of their condition families. If the tenant was industrious and
enterprise.
is
easy
exertions
sacrifices
their
and
to pocket,
a
the
also,
this
whole
of
sinking
in proportion
he
land,
enabled
capital,
peasants
Irish
of
has
MA RX
to
would
benefit
In the
the
adjust
second
risk
of
the
and
these
apportion
way seems
it
investment
his
to
its
find
case
holding of
him
equally
a
without
return.”’
landlords
may,
as
they
manufactures
or no
these time
to
have
deal
with
please,
or
capitalist leases at
in
invest
all,
know
class their
there
farming,
farmers,
a
whether how to
large
of
stock
can
be
they
secure
in
no take the
“proper” return of their outlays. But with regard to Ireland supposition is quite fictitious. On the one side you have there a small class of land monopolists, on the other, a very large class of tenants with very petty fortunes, which they have no chance to invest in different ways, no other field of the
production fore,
forced
opening
to
to
become
them,
except
tenants-at-will.
the
soil.
They
Being
once
are,
there-
tenants-at-
THE
INDIAN
will,
they
provided
could
their
and
some
losing
of
small
they
in
the
conditions
as say
tenant, contract. We and
arrangements, be effectually
revenue,
their
capital.
Investing
it, in
run
the
of
losing
their
may
be
risk
want no tenant,
that
society’, of
the
are
all
of
not
hangman.
the
make
supreme
useless
power.
social
the
Has,
ments”
the
Parliamentary
the
own under
landlord
the
original
regulate
these
can
enactment
with
Does
them,
Irish
the and
been
of
which
a
third
converted
into
of
social
and
instead
force,
men
intervention
a
of
conditions
among
want
land-
policeman, armed
improper
society”
should
conditions
of
Times
it
of
the
“‘proper
magistracy of
we
society’’,
of
soldier,
The
“‘conditions
from
should
arrangements
perhaps,
emanating
no
compulsory
revolutionist?
reorganising
society
offspring
those
in
a the
There
ought,
between for
of
under
Legislature,
but
created
provided
interference of
upon
agency.”’
want,
interference
any case
in left
the tenant’s forthcoming.
adjusted
be
conditions
“‘proper
preventing
would
an
such
for
that
being
thus
easily
that
Parliamentary
them
society,
be fate,
believe
should
the
and
to
demand
conditions
we
under
the
any
at
substituted
more as we
but
the
said,
something
another, representing compensation should be
society,
might,
because
Indeed,
or
‘it
without
remark,
of it
Times,
expire
shape for this
that
truth
The
hardly
some
in
property,
a
risk
revenue,
their
continues
‘Perhaps,’
proper
the
invest
71
RIGHT
also.
tenantry ground, is
not
do
secure
capital,
run
naturally
they
to
order
TENANT
QUESTION—IRISH
revolution,
“arrange-
the
“Parliamentary
of
enactments”? England has subverted the conditions of Irish society. At first it confiscated the land, then it suppressed the industry?? by ‘Parliamentary enactments”, and lastly, it broke
the
created
Irish the
those
a
enable
and
The
on
the
least 1f
advice
bayonets,
of
‘‘conditions
of
of
their
mitigation
you
don’t
can’t
Parliament
conditions
to
And
force.
thus
England which
society’?
caste of rapacious lordlings to dictate to the terms on which they shall be alowed to hold to live upon it. Too weak yet for revolutionising conditions’, the people appeal to Parliament,
Times;
society,
armed
the
those “social demanding at
says
by
abominable
small
people land
energy
active
The
society, and
to
mend
Times,
The
pour
regulation.
under
that. tried
Times
out
and
live
proper
And
the
if
tomorrow
would
sanguinary
be
the
But
““No”’,
conditions Irish
to first
people,
mend
to
denunciations
of their
appeal of
the
MA R X
K A RL
72
“aboriginal
faults
taste
Saxon
a
“If
for
so
find
it
says
tion
consists
much in
The
the
letting
Celtic
and
Times,
Jand,
he
legal
get
will
another, his
find
the
Anglo-
amelioration.
‘deliberately
to
harder
wanting
race”,
progress
pacific
landlord,”
will
the
of
one
injures
and
tenant, he his occupa-
whereas the
more
Ireland.
The
land
all
difficult
to let.”
case
The
stands
rather
in
differently
one
injuring
tenant, the easier another. The tenant who comes the ejected one, and the ejected
keeping
down
landlord
injures
oppress
the
landlord,
and
ruin
Ireland—a
of
comfort “The
occupant.
fact
to
not
the
relations
a
only
between
This
precisely
The
will
im,
is
it
a to
the
means
of
one
is the
means
of
due
course
in
tenant,
will
probability,
time,
of
mnjure
but
a very
however,
more
find
himself
very
the
fact,
source
precarious
tenant.
ruined
says
That,
the
affording,
traders,’’
is
injuring
is
himself,
in
two
new
the
beside
he
the
landlord
are
tenant
and
those
between
Times.
which pervades the whole leader of The Times. The needy Irish tenant belongs to the soil, while the soil belongs to the English lord. As well you might call the relation between the robber who presents his pistol, and the traveller who presents his purse, a relation between two traders.
says
“But,” landlords than
that
hands,
must
and
at
Here,
not is
landlord
least,
terminating
in
by
the
hammer
and
the
latter
a
case
“potent both
ing
of
the
pending agency”
parties.
of
the
fact,
by
reformed
property
Ireland
of
emigration
of
relation
between
an agency is
more
passing
fast
continues,
its
Irish potent
into
new
cultivation
the
of
Sultan
between for
the
tenant,
expelled old
has
truth.
British
Parliament
a moment when the worked-out old the common ruin, both of the thrifty
needy
down
us
be
Times
at
sion,
reminds
point
rate
The
the
principi
transfer.”’
interfere
and
“in
The
same
the
petitio
soon
present
the
if
undergo
system
The Times, tenants will
legislation.
of
and,
does
the
two
settling
the
Encumbered by of
compulsory Morocco. parties,
their
being
knocked
Estates
Commis-
former
emigration.
Whenever he
knew
controversy,
there of
than
no by
This
was more kill-
THE
INDIAN
could
“Nothing Right,
tend,”
greater
“‘to
ownership.
TENANT
QUESTION—IRISH
The
concludes than
confusion
person
only
The
Times
a
such
any
with
73
RIGHT
with
communistic
right
in
the
to
regard
Tenant
distribution
land,
is
the
of
landlord.”
Times seems to have been the sleeping Epimenides of past half century, and never to have heard of the hot controversy going on during all that time tipon the claims of the landlord, not among social reformers and Communists, The
the
among
but
Ricardo,
Great
Britain,
as
was
he
very
the
class.
political
not
did
quite
economists
creator
the
controvert
convinced
that
the
of
modem
of
British
the
“right’’
their
claims
the
of
middle
economy
political
were
in
landlords,
upon
based
on
right, and that political economy in general to do with questions of right; but he attacked land-monopoly in a more unassuming, yet more scienand not nothing
fact,
had the
and
tific,
private
more
therefore
proprietorship
respective
claims
relation
quite
that
advantage, the interest
interest
all
be
to
tedious these
from
landed
other
three
the
of
of
my
For
most
the
the
was
conclusions
recent
economical
Economist,
whose
might,
the State; opposed to
the it
whole
economical
society.
end,
was
land,
of
by
Ricardo
the
from
the
rent
the
that
farmer,
modern all
by
proved
with,
that
and
enumerate
premises
monopoly.
incoherent
appropriated the landlord
classes
the
of
production; be of
He
distinguished and
and
relationship
with great finally that of
in,
modern
of of
as
land, labourer,
superfluous
framework
expression
in the
of
manner.
dangerous
It
would drawn
against
School
and the
the
suffice
to
quote
authorities
of
Great
will
Britain. The
London
son,
is not only and not only appendage in every
a
too, ed
in
no
title
different
viduals,
a
claim
or
Whig
articles the
oracle,49
an
also
composite
that
any
authorising
to
Free Trade Whig, but
exactly
individual,
exclusive
editor,
chief
Mr.
a
but
Whig
inevitable ministry,
speaking
or any
proprietorship
Wil-
one,
Treasury-
has
contend-
can
there number in
J.
the
of
exist indi-
soil
ofa
Nation.
Mr.
Ing
Newman,
in
his
Lectures
1851, professedly socialism, tells us:
written
London,
on for
Political
the
purpose
Economy,
of
refut-
a
74
he
KARL
‘‘No man has, occupies it in
other
right
is
as
ments
the
The
This
the
exactly
held
artificial
call
it)....
of
private
right
long as only. All enactbecomes
Parhamentary
any time, land possessors to withhold
in
Ireland,
of
the
most
so
at
case
the
before
(or
law’’
‘If,
claims
the the
confirms
lectures
of
would
upon,
is
have, a natural right to /and except His right is to the use, and to the use
creation
Times
needed to live to an end.”
expressly
or can person.
and
Mr.
audiences
Newman and
the
of
comes
it
tenantry,
Irish
select
MARX
in
British
aristocracy. In
conclusion
bert
to
purporting acknowledged Trade
one
“‘No
a
as
the
land,
or
men
never
rest
the
might
be
Not
lawyers given
wax.
Could
in
becomes obtained?
Does
exist? at
laws
which by
were be
or
by
let
as
to
large
can
the
become
legislation.
would
leasing
his
them
from
John,
or
a
Is
community. and
be
held
acres
from
the
nation.
His
surface
earth’s
It
is
canal,
is
still
despotism.”’
were in
It
The
current
the
to
preference if not,
And
what
.
so
estates
of
.
where
a
railway,
valid,
to
impossible
property....
private
Grace, Stewards
he
great
by
the
an
isolated
Instead will would
tenantry the only land a claim to exclusive
quences,
pen.
If
We
or a
daily
turnpike
pay be
corporate
of
it
not
did
the
paying
rent
an
public
tenure.... possession
his
agent, officials,
Pushed
of
the
any
deny road
be of
or
the
to
be
made?
a
be
We
of
do
change
the
Instead would
agent
deputy-agent
instead
in
landlordism
individuals,
farmer
to
mode
requisite.
simply
of
customs
deeds,
body—society.
proprietor,
to
all
discover
We do not scruple to seize just as many acres as may not wait for consent.... The change required would of landlords.... Instead of being in the possession
country
the Chronicles. than with the
holders right
in
land-
can are
Hardly.
a
The
property
such
used
subsequent
rest
the
property
only.
blows
was
blood
generate
bequest
prevent
Free
altogether....
to
constituted?
all
to
permit
earth
titles
the
of
sufferance
conveyancers:
of
and
him look in sword, rather
seals
thus
communism,
not
the
from
the
for
pretensions sale
earth
so
the
and
way does
existing
think with
notwithstanding.
land
our
the
written
a
such
expelled
anyone
.
the
also,
one act of transfer can give no title, can many? per annum do invalid claims become valid? The right
rate
mankind
be that
claims
the
of
in
Her-
1851,
development
therefore,
on
live
but soldiers payment;
valid
earth
Equity,
equitably
previously
and
the
pretended,
coin
what
England.
would
legitimate. Should original deeds were
At
modern
of
Mr.
from
London,
refutation
elaborate
it.
passages
Statics,
most
use
using
some
quote Social
complete
of
may
simuarly
less
be
doctrines
from
me
let work,
Spencer’s
private
of
lease
of of
Sir
the
ones, conse-
to its ultimate soil involves landowning
T HE
I NDI AN
SH Q U ES T I O N— I RI
Thus,
from
political but
in
the
the
ing
very
economists,
it
tenants and of their native
Insh
soil
the
the
demands
to
antagonism
of
T ENA NT
the
British
point is
not
view
of
the
who
country,
The places
modem
English
English
have
and
people,
middle-class
of
usurping
labourers, Irish
75
RI G HT
the
Times, itself
landlord only
right
in
oppos-
into
direct
science. c
Published Daily July
in
The
Tribune 11,
1853
No.
New-York 3816,
Printed of
the
according
newspaper
to
the
text
Karl
From
Marx
FAILURE
FINANCIAL
CABS—IRELAND—THE
Like
the
particular
quence are so such side
world
is of
in and
famine
high
in
over
the
“pond’’,*
every
such
insanity
has
1847,
and
from
the
Sixth
Asylums
(1,301 L852
wages
really
to
used the
of
on
at
Look District
return
Irish
that,
the
in
flocking
after
people
other
since
following
and
data
Private
admissions
of
males
and
ce
males
and
ee
males
and
in
Lunatic
1,283
eee 1,386
2,584
Asylums
females.)
ee
ee
teen
eens
2,662
eens
2,870
females. )
ce
ce
ee ee
1,423
females.)
And this is the same country in which the celebrated Swift, the founder of the first Lunatic Asylum in Ireland,42 doubted whether 90 madmen could be found.
Published Daily
in
The
Tribune
August
*
12,
Marx
New-York
No.
Printed
3844,
of
1853
means
here
1s
hand,
them
Criminal
this
Ireland’’:
1...
(1,447
the
conse-
are
on the progress among
1851?
on
if
in
in
permanently
formerly
terrific
Ireland
labourer,
labourers
settle
it
that
then,
amelioration
ee
1853
March,
the
social
since
LL
(1,276
for
they
Report
total
1851—Sum
assured
while
such
in
are
Irish
is
QUESTION
Why
to
how
especially
‘“‘the
Lunatic
it that
England
progress, made
paradise
is
to
If
harvest?
making
we
exodus.+!
Ireland,
masses of
a
GOVERNMENT—
RUSSIAN
general,
becoming
OF
the
Irish
Sea.—Ed.
the
according
newspaper
to
the
text
Karl
From
THE
and
WAR
TRADE
Marx
QUESTION—
BRITISH
RETURNS—DOINGS
POPULATION
PARLIAMENT
OF
cr
In
on
its
the
sitting
fate
mons
ten
after
Tenant
three
of
Bill,
9, the
Aug.
of
Ireland
Bills,
the
laws
Lords
of
carned
deliberation,
months’
removing
House
to
had
through
viz.:
the
decide
the
Com-
Landlord
mortgages,
conceming
and
which
present an insuperable bar to the effective sale of the smaller estates not falling under the Encumbered Estates Act*3; the Leasing Powers Bill, amending and consolidating more than sixty acts of Parliament which prohibit leases to at
form
be
entered
into
pensation exist,
improvements
for
and
preventing
Tenant's
any
of
clause
for
the
House
of
Lords
statute
book
acts
legislation
is
founded
as
sitting
run
a
‘Such
was heard
was
never of
Bill,
before,
any
Carried
quite
such he
in
the
the
total
believed,
government out
a
and This
Earl
in of
violation submitted
having
retrospective
a
containing provision.
The
to parliamentary
as
time,
cause,
surprising
exclaimed
bill,’’
Compensation
own
their
the
it has
laden
the
IV
meddling
of Entail.
in
to the present day, tenant, and as its very with landed property,
Edward
landlord laws
this
object
tenant,
and
of
on
Law
on
passion
time
on
the
judges
a
into
landlord
and
the
com-
tenant
the
of
not
lastly,
providing
landlord,
operation
course,
of
the
from
instance
for
could,
the
contracts
where
Bill, by
com-
tenant’s
subletting;
of
effected
with
the
instances
system
retrospective
of
existence
as
contract
between
interference
all
Compensation
improvements
for
absence
regulating in
the
Improvement
pensation
with
years,
21
for
allowed that
to
disregard
Parliament,
ventured
to
clauses
of
propose the
bill.”
noble
lords
themselves
hospital
Clanricarde,
and
the
‘“‘as of
nor such
to
invalids.
of the all
Tenants’
contracts,
had
he
a measure
ever
as
78
KARL
The
withdrawal prospect of “The
whole
as
went of their
Lords
a
9}
question
rebellion
loyalty
same
confidence
my
Gently,
to
obedience and two
lord,
there
But
for
ever a
long
the
of
House
the
sake
their what
was
and
their
was
Lords
am
I
was to
obedience
tts
Britain!
Great
anachronism?
only
upon
lived
to
themselves
resist
opinion.
account
“I
prop-
what
to secure their One magistrate
have
encourage
the
landed
said old Lord St. Leonards, collision with the other
or on
the
know
“‘for the sake House, or for
a
like these.” Roden, ‘‘but
out
proprietors
saw to
like
the
public
called
popularity,
of
and
the
nearly
landed
they
If
What
of
with
hold
“‘touched
the
of
would
Crown,
naturally
lordships,”
imperfect measures claimed the Earl of
he
poor
the
Commons
‘Let not preventing
nobleman,
gently!
time They
of
to
Crown? A landlord rebellion in uttered a more monstrous
been
anachronisms.
the
Crown
and
country.
this
way,
supremacy
the
constables.
Has
to
attachment
the
Ireland.
the
in Ireland in the Government of erty in Ireland treated in such a to secure their supremacy? ”’
in
and
remarked
the
of
threaten
allegiance,
feudal
landlord
question,”
as to
far
MARX
a pressure
of
do not highly
pass
without,
from
any
belong to interested
in
ex-
party,”
the
welfare
of
Ireland.”
interested
say,
to
That is
in
the
party
question,
shout
of
Whig
Lords
tion
Lords,
the
sioned the
and there
to
which
will formed
originated, the that
not
Lords’
so
Earl
was.
of
substantial
measures cluding
was
has
existed
throw
the
out,
bills
a mere
farce,
“This is
the
no
unanimous both
parties,
Lords#*
and
a
Opposisecret
whole
impas-
the
benefit
the
from
highly
between
Coalition
beginning
and
the
performed
for
reporters.
be
evident the by
when
subject the
of
Coalition
we so
these
change
bills made
introduced by of the growing
remember hot
a
that
the
bills
were
controversy but
Cabinet,
Irish Attorney-General under the Tories at the last elections
testimony
Roden.
of
But
to be
Ireland
question,”
it
Lords,
was
discussion
the
of
and
Tory
newspaper
This
a
but
supposes
lordship
welfare
House;
understanding of
his
by
Mr.
Napier,
the Derby Ministry, and in Ireland appealed to the
introduced
them.
The
only
by
the
the
Tory Government was the exfrom being distrained upon.
crops
House
by of
Commons
in
the
WAR
QUESTION—BRITISH
are
bills
“The
mesbury,
him.
assertion
the
Mr.
ing
Tories
had
the the
fell
introduced
could,
of
course,
mons;
but
they
Lords.
Lord
The formally
out
for
Derby,
the
chief
the
Daily
of
August
24,
No.
1853
a
a
letter
same.” stat-
New-York
3854,
their
This
late
of
the
largest absent
own
in
being made
the
the
own
reading,
accordingly and
and
cabinet, of
the
Com-
House
resistance
faint
contented
present
in with
and
was Lord
ministry,
proprietors of land indisposition.
the The
Tories
House
burked
a
would
on
in,
measures.
their
info
ministry,
Lords
being
from
bills
second
session. the
the
himself
through the
President
The
Tribune
Napier,”
Napier,
Coalition
bills
Newcastle
of
time one of the managed, wisely, to be
in
whose
the
Mr.
qf
not
did
is
not
Coalition their
party
Irish
oppose sure of
not
same
Published
Mr.
“‘here
are
letter the
The
these
declared
thrown
in,
Bills.
opposing
of
Duke
Aberdeen
nominal
remained
were
passing
the
he “But
of
Mal-
of
Duke.
Earl,
bills
Earl
whether
“That the
the
another
inherited
having
of
that
Ireland task
having
Coalition
said
“‘Now,”
“‘is
the
the
believe?”
stating Duke,
exclaimed
replied
79
RETURNS
are.”’
opposed
Tories
then
TRADE
Newcastle
of
not,”
you
the
they the
If
Duke
Duke.
said
that
have
the
Napier,
“There,”
same,’
the
“‘Certainly
would
answered
from
not
asking
believe
AND
POPULATION
but
the
bills
being
really
done.
Lord
Lansdowne,
yet in
at
the
Ireland,
from
Printed of
the
according
newspaper
to
the
text
Karl
From
us now
Let
tion,+®
one
people.
I shall
declared of
Ministry,
Perhaps
Lord
those
committee.’
And
(House
‘Because political
for
of
the
may
they
you mass
have
be
welfare
which
1,
1813.)
people
other
considered,
right....
1,
and It
was
then
condescended
what
was
(House
favour’.
lurking
entirely
to
of
asking has
the
their the
the
of
cynic
the
discontinue
behind
this
by
the
will
the
go
the
into
right? to impose
right
as
whole....
it
This
government
no
rights
ruling
of
at
all,
10,
to
made,
but
immunities,
a
such deem
belongs
ever
class—may
Feb.
may
ts founded.”
confession
ground the
never
I
not
community,
Commons,
upon
as one
If I thought
would
them. Accordingly, Lord Palmerston words, ‘Catholic Emancipation to be
erace
Wel-
1813.)
amount
words,
the
with
be
civilised
have
that
member
liberty
of
one,
for
the
of
most
Irish
having
emancipation.
grant
plain
he
in
I,
their
class the
allowed
to
ground
on
the
the
of
Legislature--or,
to
and
March
Commons,
There that
safety
principles
that
intermeddled
a country
of
a
when
religious
March
to
any
the
of
that,
nevertheless,
to
claims
right,
opposed
gratitude
himself:
the
Commons,
upon
the
fundamental
(House
upon
Legislature
be
for
their
for
he
the
to
Catholic
stand of
disabilities
necessary the
is
not
the
to
asking
why
entered, hostile
answer
I wish
the
circumstances,
considered
Man,
claims
were
Catholics
he
Emancipa-
Catholic
Emancipation,
Catholic
may
He
the
avowedly
of
‘‘Although
admit
upon
for
on
“claims”
Palmerston
Rights
Legislature.
exertions
Ministry,
Canning
the
PALMERSTON45
his
dwell for
lington of
at
great
his not
himself
the
LORD
look
of
Marx
deem
that the fit
declared
in
measure
of
1829.)
of
expediency
that
Catholic
disabilities.
And
expediency?
LORD
81
PALMERSTON
Being to
ed
entertain
evils
than
cure
Laws.
(House
estates
sky
“It
is
of
think
of
Still,
he
is
“at
a
well
said,
“‘that
the
are
enjoyed
with
all
the
a
by
and
sufferer!
his
Irish
alfow
Irish
to
misery clouds,
the
is
at
rate
the
peasant
Irish
seldom”
(only
not
do
of
family
the
Ireland
of
peasantry
all
(only
a
week).
7s.
of
has
his
comforts.
out
days
four
enjoy
England”
six)
of
food.”’
(House
’’
to
the
as
in
cleared
inauspicious
peasantry
however,
fuel,
its
a comfort! But this is not a greater cheerfulness of mind
has
As
“‘still,
Poor
for
moneylords.*
by
enjoyed
comforts
supplied
What
them
and
it
1829.)
not
with
that
substitute
afterwards
could
landlords
the
for
natives,
Irish
for
impossible,
a
18,
want-
he
remedies
are
who
the he
other
March
a moment,
continues,
loss
“he
Irish
proprietors,
prove
and
Commons,
which
all
that
for
true,’
comforts
Irish
Emancipation
philanthropist,
even
bright
He
of
their
of
darken,
delusion,
absenteeism,
great
The
the
great
the
of
Catholic
would
the
one
himself
of
of
a way
pleasant
as
the
than
7,
May
Commons,
extortions
all
he
comfort
his
English
has—
fellow-
1829.)
Irish
landlords,
with
the
he
comforts
deals
with
the
Insh
of
peasantry. is
said
can
_,
ance;
be
that
certainly
in
we
Are initiated stitution”,
in
Paper
77,
The
The
New-York
October
19,
1853
the
version
Tribune
sentence and
as
“comforts
of
follows
the is
highest
a
not
same
the
rent
possible
singular
circumst-
thing.”
(House
her
of
them
over
all
1853,
Daily
verified Daily
of
this
October
moneylords.’’—Ed.
“‘The
article
which
19,
1853,
bright
sky
of
deeply
con-
institutions’’,
to
according
with
The
text
the
Paper
People’s
and
New-York
Tribune
worded the
so
English
Continent?
appeared
Marx
over
the
free
the
The
of
man,
the of
Printed
22,
October
3902,
In
does
People’s
No.
*
landlord
that
surprised that of the “glories
spreading
Tribune
Daily
the
on
insists
I believe
1829.)
the
at
aspire
in
7,
and
Published
and
landlord Sir,
then to be the mysteries
in
No.
Irish Why,
England
March
Commons,
should
the
extorted.
:
“It that
in
The the
Parliament
New-York end of
of
the
landlords
Karl
From
Mr.
I.
Marx
[THE BLUE BOOKS—PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES OF FEBRUARY 6...— THE IRISH BRIGADE]
Butt,
in
sitting
yesterday’s
the
of
gave
Commons,
notice to-morrow the table
‘that
at
clerk,
to-day, and imputing to
money.
Mr.
Butt
money
will
be
legality
of
any
session.
mercy have
1834 Peel
the
of
Irish and
they In
compelled
to
was
posed
to
restore
British
by
the
Times
was
the Sir
down
majority
in
their
the
who
and
to
IV
the
mind.
J. Graham
Melbourne
1837
at
members
to
the
during
placed
Irish
for
that
settled
been
William
the of
of
the
trafficking
Ministers
Cabinet
election
a
read
The
remember
has
is
the
they
there
dismiss
In
Lord the
Administration.
to
that
Lower
1841,
of
House
op-
that Administration, the votes of the Irish Brigade strong enough to turn the scale and keep it in office. It the
Cabinet.
Irish With
never
any
was
Brigade all
this
injustice
power To
never
what
again
power any
prevented
greatest
1834-1841. tion
It
in place
1835
while
their
Downing-st.
Brigade.4’
and
be
in
the
who
trafficking
the
general
nor
of
from
the
have
those
drove
Ministry
at
only
by
mode
kept
From
were was
as
1830
should
published
The Dublin Freeman's Journal, House a trafficking in places for
of the
indignant
other
there
article
a Select Committee to inquire into contained in these publications”’.
for
understood
Since
created
Stanley.
is
that
an
House,
also move trafficking
He should allegations of such
last
move
should
the
previous statements [/rish ] members of
the the
Why
he
of
to
of
installed
the
against
English
at account but
the
the
was a cry
people. time it
of
turned?
for
the
their
Coalition
the
Cabinet-making,
infamies
was
anything
who
Brigade
own
The
country period of
O’Connell,
The Whigs
Irish against
from
agitathe
BLUE
BOOKS—PARLIAMENTARY
Tories, who
in
to
order
knows
against,
own put put
the
differ
was on
Whigs
Magistrates
in
condition
Ireland.
patriotic
off
their
dumb
hatred
to
an account
in
Tribune
February
21,
The
New-York
No. 1854
4008,
the
so-called
83
Whigs.
Nobody
Lichfield-House
from this opinion—that contract by to vote for, but hcensed to spout
their
Published
from
the
6...
FEBRUARY
OF
places
about
off
representatives
Daily
extort
anything
Contract,*® will which O’Connell
DEBATES
airs.
that
he
should
It
is
time
for
It
is
time
fortthe
of
the for
English their
the and
nominate Irish
Brigade
Irish
people
call
his
to to
their
own
to
text
wrongs.
Printed
of the
according
newspaper
the
Karl
Marx
IRELAND’S
London,
England, English
and
13.
March
socially—by industrial,
REVENGE#49
Ireland
has
bestowing
an
or
maritime
commercial
furnishing the English ‘Trish Brigade’. In 1833, Daniel O’Connell as “‘base, bloody and brutal’. In 1835, he tool
opposed
office support What of
to from it
the
of
the
1835
April received
the
from
O’Connell
between
O’Connell
English
and
Contract,
O’Connell promised Parliament.
size,
with the
most
was
remained
because
his
an
Whigs
the
majority it
of
Insh
1833
of
any
became
1841
August
every
decried
Administration,
to
upon
on
town of Parliament
and
in
the
Brigade. O’Connell
agreement, known as the Lichfreld-House according to which the Whig Cabinet granted government “‘patronage”’ in Ireland, and O’Connell the Whig Cabinet the votes of the Irish Brigade in An
1835?
the
although
Melbourne
intervened
tely
Whigs;
herself
quarter
politically—by
efficient
°
revenged
Irish
“King
Dan’s”
were
Whigs
Repeal
agitation®
overthrown,
as
but
began
soon
were mon
as
immediathe
Tories
defeated “King Dan” sank again to the level of a comadvocate. The influence of the Irish Brigade by no means came to an end with O’Connell’s death. On the contrary, it became evident that this influence did not depend on the talent of one person, but was a result of the general state of affairs. The Tories and Whigs, the big traditional
equally
parties
the
balanced.
numerically Irish
in
Brigade,
ment,
should
scale.
Hence
small
English
It
is
which play the
thus the
factions,
took
a
not
suprising
Manchester
seats
their
decisive
importance
were
Parliament,
role of
in and
the
more that
or
the be
“Irish
reformed
able
new,
the
School*!
to
quarter’
less
and
the
parlia-
turn in
the the
IRELAND’S
English
Parliament.
longer
The
and
erty
and
slogan
malady
their
that
would
help
But having taken rights of the tenants,
a means The had
Irish
Brigade
to
ownership
The
patriotism
the
of
propose
these
Irish
P.s
M.
knows Keogh,
a
also
has
liberal
legal
to
counsel
so that the juridical general now composed entirely of the
of
Clerk
by
Muntz,
rightly
to
to
the
close other the
ment
side,
Irish
policy
fact and
that also
officers
is already Sergeant from
He
has
appointed of
Lieutenant
of
Ireland,
fact
Irish
has that
has
been
government
Irishmen.
is
Monsell,
government, has been hesitation, although—
an arms the
manufacturer,
a
musket
Irish
influence
the
Catholic
over to
Irish
of
colonels
militia.
an gone
the
of
proteges
nominating
the
froma
lieutenants
the
when in
Ireland, Brigade
to
exerting Shee
the
Lichfield-House
the
advised
Brigade
and
of
distinguish
preference
high-ranking
Palmerston’s from
has
birth
member
coalition
cannot
to the
of
Ireland,
and
and
the
for
Catholics
some
give
the
the
of
after
Palmerston always
support by
the
landed
decided
Irishman
Lord
staff
coalt-
had
the
basis.
the
helped taken
an
Birmingham
observed—Monsell
counties and
for
in
and
having
gain
M.P.
Com-
reform
to
third
the
the
Palmerston
deputy
needle-gun. priests
in
Ordnance
reappointed
as
a
of
Attorney-General
Catholic
and
to
renewed
Brigade,
Solicitor-General,
become
is
a
they used Repeal—as
It
granted,
for
all-embracing
the
of
one,
themselves,
order
cause
prop-
ministry
position?
designed
who
on an
chief
Fitzgerald, has
in
always
words
House
Derby
minor
its
Brigade
quarter’,
1835
the
made
Irish
Irish
Contract.
the
a
use
it
other
the
no
the
had
in the House, formerly the
as
Tories
measures
“‘Irish
of
Contract
did
Palmerston,
his
into
though
measures
Ireland.
get seats
overthrown
even
only
could
Thus
in
Lichfield-House
government. How coalition to burke
tion
in
slogan,
their etc.—just
used it
to explore the real relations of landed
is,
the
election
had
a seat,
obtained
what
that
a new
to conclude
O’Connell
do
them
mons. the
to
no
“Repeal”
be ?
theme.
make
the
reform
could
Emancipation?
was
it
the
propaganda
do,
to
and
with
too,
problem, Catholic
to
refused
Irish
masses
Irish
as a permanent were compelled
politicians the
the
the
Since
serve
avoided
stir
scene
the
left
O’Connell
‘“Catholic’’
occasionally. longer
After
to
possible
slogan.
of
85
REVENGE
That
is evident the
govern-
Bishop
of
86
KARL
Athlone
has
pushed
that
moreover
tion
of
the
have
the
Wherever
taken
their
re-election
clergy
Catholic
Fitzgerald.
clergy
through the
has
ranks
patriotism”
“‘Irish
Keogh
of
promoted
lower
MARX
the
re-elec-
the
of
and
Catholic
seriously
and
have
up
to those members of the Irish Brigade who deserted to the government, they have been rebuked by their bishops who are well aware of the diplomatic secret. stood
protestant
A
existing merston
between
who
hand
will
The
and
condition
and Irish
“Irish
be
equally
Irish
in
the
soczal
quarter”
in
is
being
revolution.
capitalist,
is
The
taking
chief
one
Australia, still
are:
and the
million which
carries
1848,54
off
which
or
starvation
removed
this by
Irish
the
old
the
the
clergy
a very as the
England, Ireland.
their
an
the
to the
Anglothe
English and
Both
back
by
the
seem
clergy
revolution
tenures,
big
sell
measure
behind
of
to
of
in
the
the
however,
decreases
Irish
system, modern
landowner.
another
million
the
unsuccessful
thousands;
finally
destroyed
from
the
land
and
insurrection
Ireland’s
in
faith
of
herself;
Parliament which exposed the estates of Irish aristocrats to the hammer of the
bailiff,°5
drove
is,
English
Brigade; other
power
It
in
replaced of
the
transformed
by
place
PalM.P.s
which prepared the ground for this 1847, the year of famine,53 which killed Irishmen; emigration to America and
lastly the Act of debt-ridden old
auctioneer
as
the
factors
transformation
nearly
tenures
small
of
being
elect
the
the
same grows
the
that
course
the
1s
the
and
fact
to
and
it.
sphere
radically
In
system
system
the
of
When
will
dominate
buy
sphere
Parliament
unaware
to
to
in
political
agricultural the
that
the
clergy.
priests
salaries
strengthen
in
society
Saxon
and
acknowledge
and
Irish the
congruity
“‘complete
Palmerston.”’
one
the
both
the
Brigade
posts
phenomenon
influence
the
and
the
priests,
Lord
Irish
toss
permits
influence
Celtic
the
extend
remarkable
to
England
that
to
help
Palmerston to the
they
clergy
Catholic
bemoans
Ireland
use
Whigs
Parliament
on
Lord
over over
hands
newspaper
Tory
thus
away
their
driving
small
them
from
tenants,
the
land
subtenants
just
and
cottagers. Published No.
127,
in
Neue
March
Oder- Zeitung 16,
1855
Translated
from
the
German
Karl
Marx
PARLIAMENT]
[FROM
years
two
For
considering
as
Parliament,
three
bills
c
]
{Excerpt
is
to
designed
well
known,
regulate
the
has
been
relations
of
landowners and tenants. One of the bills determines the amount of compensation which the tenant should be entitled to claim for the improvements he made on the land, in the event of the landowner terminating the lease. Hitherto, all improvements made by Irish tenants—most of whom hold a temporary lease concluded for one year—have merely enabled the landowner to demand a higher rent on the expiration of the existing lease. Thus the tenant either loses the farm, if he does not wish to renew the lease under less favourable cond!Irish
tions,
and
in
the
improvements,
in
addition
made
with
with
mentioned coalition
to
the the (the
bills
was
cabinet therefore,
mons,
but
Ministers then
the
loses is
compelled
rent,
interest
one
House
the
them them
till in
a
them
back
to
distorted
form.
There
the
main
Bill
was
Thursday, had of
been the
sacrificed
and
the
turned
government
associated
with
the
the
were
astonished
them
partly
and them.
partly
altar
by
Sergeant
the
votes
Shee’s
of
In
Comof
the
(in
1855)
and
their
point
was in
Commons
the
see
property that
votes of
this
Compensation
landed
to
the
Brigade.
House
of of
by
which
Insh
that
of
the
with
earlier
connivance
House
on
invested landlord,
the
for
session
clause
has the
improvements
the
way
Irish
against
the
the
next
the
sending
on
by
with
such
blunted,
he
pay
to
Support
passed
Lords
of
capital
arrangements votes of the
the
of
were
they
the
capital.
tenant’s)
purchased
shelved
amended
or
original
his
1854,
he he
farm
the
members
of
those
furious
last scales
directly
attack
on
88
KARL
threatened to this moment
Palmerston which at Palmerston Brigade. visit
the
of
He
him
the
day his
rescinded
and
to
Commons
in
promise
Irish
the
of
the order
to
vote
on
of
this
gave decline
the
of
had
Palmerston
no
is
longer
in
that
the
to
use way
the
of
the
motion. House
scenes The
18.
Irish
of
1s ready
of
typical
Irish
have
of
M.P.s
majonty
of
was
House
the
scandalous
to vote
support
the
deputation able
he
course,
parliament.
known
whether
no-confidence
intrigue
oligarchic
votes, but it became not authorised the
105
M.P.s
the
of
secure
those
of
Irish
Irish
through
the
the
parliamentary
Palmerston,
in
exposure rise to one
the
an
Sadleir,
of
to enquire
the
of
18
of
quarter’”’
consequences.
middleman
clause
division.
“Irish
serious the help
have
during
premature
Commons
to
anything
Brigade
The
have with
yesterday
carry
in the
deputation
influence
another
riot
and
a
for
before
use
to
coalition
arranged
to
willing
could negotiated
therefore
ex-member
a
unleash
MARX
Altogether,
govern-
during
ment crises in quite the same as in O’Connell’s time. Along with the dissolution of the old established parliamentary factions, the “Insh quarter’, too, crumbles and disintegrates. makes At
the
use same
of
of
war,
theatre
the
time
some
small
incident
sphere,
if
telegraph
the
hands
amateurish
mentary and
the
case, the incident shows time won to influence the he waits for some favourable
parliamentary
submarine
from
any
In
wrenched
generals
and
astrological
whims
of
and
quite
has
not
the
of
diplomatic unparalleled
intrigues. character
can
which
in the
made
Palmerston
various
cliques.
news be
the
from
military. of
it dependent
Hence the
the
exploited
direction
Bonaparte of
how
on
and the
in
The
the
on
war the
parlia-
inexplicable
second
Crimean
campaign.°®
Published No.
325,
in July
Neue
16,
Oder-Zeitung
1855
Translated
from
the
German
Karl
From
LORD
Marx
JOHN
RUSSELL? r
IV
London,
the
war,’® lower
to
lower.
throw
and
into
it
but
Commons,
through
then
George
III.
thrust
themselves
on
with
Ireland.
were
for
reformed
which
old
tion.69
and
on
Irish
Church
*
The
part
measure’,
to
which
by
Judges
men and
“fire,
bigot
in vain,
to
IV)
on
George
a
reconciliation agitation
Reform
were
of
a
they
the
Irish
to
Juries.”-
be
civil
Coercion
tried Ed.
in
they
war
as
Ireland
by
fulfilled
transportation the
for
sedi-
Coercion
Bill
would
follows
against
‘Red-Coat
Bill,>9
Whigs
stipulating
reads
Ireland,
prosecuted
carried
that
clause
of
against Coercion
The
was
and
sentence
the
declaration
Irish
imprisonment,
stipulation with
war
of
Ireland.*
O’Connell
introduced
Bill,
: a
on
law
death’.
express
last
the
of
“hopes
a declaration measure’’, the
with
they
the
Tribune
bloody
martial
with
only
Daily
was
bloody
promise But
House
flatter
about
the
the
the
though
(later
bring
during
in
to
sought,
into
Emancipation
reading
Regent
could
and
Irish
it
they
Prince
they
parliament
even
and
only
imposed
their
the
small
stepped
raised in Ireland” merely powerful instruments to be used for Yet their first act at the first meeting of the
them
“brutal
a
withdrew
and O’Connell,
purposes.
party
anti-Jacobin
temporarily
second
1812,
In
Before
upon
fawned
a
that
the
they
of
ground
the
of
in
they
introduced
idiocy the
outbreak
Whigs
When
they
carried
the
the
of
standard.
1806,
in
office
Bill
her
party
With
England began to ebb They therefore turned to Ireland, decided the scales and wrote Jrish Emancipation on
influence
and
their
4.
August
a
that in
Ireland, Tribunal
military
bring
The
a Bill’,
officers,
in
an
certain New-York
‘brutal
and
according instead
of
90
KARL
portion should
be
of
this
use
to
clause
principle
that
Established
to
ought of
his
to
ground
a
consists
of
had
been
or
stand
the
by
a
the
expropriate
the
John
Russell
certainly
immense
property
with
as
the
they
had
hastened—on
the
though
Bull, the
soon
As
Whigs,
Church
collision
the
plunder. the
Parlia-
importance
acknowledges
to
whole
church
passed,
fall
avoiding
of
very
Lord
since
Ireland
that
The
it
power
the
principle of
that
fact
has
convinced
Bill
engaged
the
and
Ireland.
of
in
Church
Parliament
of
benefit
Parliament
family
Coercion
the from
Church,
be
Established
disposal
it for
flows
the
of
at the
placed
was
ment
revenue
the
of
MARX
Lords—to
out
take
any value at all. They then voted against and defeated their own measure. This happened in 1834. But towards the end of the year the Whigs’ sympathies for the Irish were aroused again as if by an electric shock. For Sir Robert Peel came into office in the that
clause,
autumn tion
1834
of
benches.
busily
only
part
the
Whigs
and And
engaged
was
the
in
the
of
on
to
had
we
immediately working
Bill
of
to
retire
see
our
reconciliation
the
Opposi-
John
Russell
with
Ireland.
He
agent in bringing about, in January 1835, the Lichfield-House Compact,®} through which the Whigs surrendered to O’Connell the Irish patronage (the right to distribute offices, etc.), and O’Connell secured to them the the
principal
votes,
Irish
both
pretext
for
needed.
With
ejecting
Ministry
ago,
a
as
war-cry. was
Peel
formed,
and the
of
one
the
he
clause,
and
acting
upon
his
he
mental
of
still
on
Under John his
the Prime
firmness
to
other
hand
views.
He
Minister,
to
such
firmness,
his of
never his
his
moral
acted moral
an extent
time
was
Secretary
and
to boast
on
now
in
although the
appropriation
moderation
upon
them.
moderation
that
short
the
Cabinet
began
for
on
views
in
“appropniation
Home
now
He
Commons.
mental
a
Melbourne
became
name
colleagues the
of
used
the
abandoned
slogan The
Russell
of
his
the
and
under
and and
the
defeated.
adhered
those
was
he
was
chose
battlefield
a
But
Street
Russell
the
notorious
withdrawn
House
hand
office
when
Lord
as
it.
of
Downing
“impudence’’,
Ireland
became
had
out
and
from
clause’’—which
Reform
clause”
Tories
of
clause—it
“appropriation
Leader
the
Revenues
very
Parliament
characteristic
Ecclestastical the
inside
he
in not
In
1846,
overcame
renounced
his
LORD
JOHN
too.
“views”
more
fatal
Reform
of
King,
than
Mr.
once
at
and
he
not
could
endangering
in
an
proposed
conceive
a
of
revenues,
the
the
be
of
and
United
Kingdom,
the
leader
1834,
the
King’s
Speech,
the
object
Parliament,
the
of
to
real
a
and
and
stated
the
agitation
some
in
in
the
was
place
of
parliament
of
chief”’.
was
agitation
and
the
of
toestablish,
the
Repeal
member
the
again
Ministry
Reform
address
record
in
to
Parliament
United
was
February
denounced
the
Commons
O’Connell
In
that
Commons
Lords,
“to
that those
of
overturn
“to
which
professed
the Established Church. February 1833, John Russell as Ministry denounced Irish Repeal,
In House
He
measure
root
essential
91
RUSSELL
most
the
maintain
manner
solemn
unimpaired
the
and
determination
fixed
undisturbed
the
of
legislative
union’’.
on
Immediately
very
the
same
that
is, In
or
The
to
then
was
became
Premier,
same
John
with
the
Bill.
Peel’s Lord
John
and But
his he
Union,
any
Russell
up
Arms
act
first
dealing
in
to
with
alliance
beer.
with
the
to punish Peel for the Peel’s administration.
Bill,
Russell
was open
subject
legislature”,
Bill
passion
exposed
the the
of
broke
Irish
benches,
Opposition
that
than
Laws,62
Corn
outraged
less
the
act
other
Lord
burning
of the pretext
the
of
any
nor
1846,
March
declared
Repeal like
more
morally that
the
to
shifted
Russell
question,
neither
Tories,
repeal
John
respect
‘“‘with amendment
being
against
resolutely
was himself
an
which
protested..He
attempt to
the
renew
to
ridicule
without
any
result. O’Connell had just conjured up huge protest meetings against Peel’s Bill and had obtained 50,000 signatures to petitions—he was in Dublin where he brought all achieving
the
means
was
O’Connell
revenue
agitation
of
generally this
moment
plice.
He
therefore
angrily
Arms
Bill
immediately.
if
at
into
association
with
the
and
defeat,
the
in
this
called)
would
he told
appeared the little
Russell Whigs,
he
play.
was
King have
Dan lost
(as
Daniel
empire
and
as Russell’s accomman to withdraw his
secret O’Connell added humiliation to a past master. To make it quite withdrew
it. Despite
his
92
KARL
obvious the
who
had
withdrawal
ordered the
of
on
ciliation Hall in Dublin John Russell announced
1844,
Russell
Ireland occupying
that
militarily,
the
of
had
charged
troops,
with
was
a pretence.
on
and
and
ly,
the
other
were
latter and
taken
by
of
In
side
the
Published 365,
No. A
in
August
shortened
was
of
Neue 8,
English
acting
version
The
Tribune
of
August
New-York
28,
by
Con-
in
“having but
proclaimed
the
were
collusion
and
his
with
the
“vigorous
employed
circumstances.
regime
in
in
Their
aim
Ireland,
but
England.
Translated
from
but
analogous
the
English
have
The
serious-
measures”’
brutality rule
the
Whigs,
game
The
English
side
followers.65
Repeal
the
the
energy,
of
one
the
the
and
Ireland
about
display
on
filled
suspension
bragged This
day In
militarily
occupied
and
the
of ‘the
Whig
1855.
in
1855
the
the
Russell
there
Government
Oder-Zeitung
published
Daily
1848,
Ireland
with
governing
Smith O’Brien who took to a comic end.
Russell
prolongation
Peel
not
Clarendon.64
were thus not demanded was, not the maintenance the
Robert
Sir
with
dupes
came
announced
at
August 17, that 1s, on the very it in the House of Commons.
In
priests
simply
hence
retreat, O'Connell to the Repealers
Felony Acts, Corpus Act,®3
measures’
O’Connellites
Bill
the
Habeas
“vigorous
too,
and
country’’.
passed
the
Arms
MARX
been
the
passages
version used
German, from
ENGELS
MARX
TO
23,
"May
Dear
Marx,
During to
then
our
tour
in
the
west
coast,
on
Galway
Limerick,
Killarney
and
English
two-thirds
Dublin,
to
one-time
capital,
country,
and
or
France absence
understand
country
itself,
so
that
the
whole
it.
With
the
same
and
has
Italy.
all
at
“Strong
the
as
regarded its
proximity, already
is
citizens
never
have sodden
seen
look
to
its
are
armed
is
highest
based
so many
Characteristic dating from the
colony
on
the
live
carbines, of fifth
this and
here
bayonets
country sixth
any the
and
lawyers,
a
total
to
on
if
the
half
of
the
corner
of
the
of
so-
may
be
Ireland which,
of
the
because
colonies.
country,
gendarme
among
in
in the old way, and so-called liberty of
oppression in
entire
everything,
a trace. and as one
Prussian
small
difficult
other
every
with
gendarmes
bibulous
perfection
with
growths the
Dus-
a
were
and
be
still governed exactly notice here that the
the
of
not
is
one
if
of
as the
of
priests,
in
seen
have
of
it would
visible
meddles
first
look
as
500
exception
profusion
supply
are
there
England’s
can
English
not
did
measures’
self-government
that
parasitic
government
the
pleasing
so
all,
these
peasants
of
picture.
in
to
London
Gendarmes,
squires
we
character
too, the towns, is
the
of
the
Tralee,
450
the
to
relation
quite
English-built,
industry
what
distress
called
the
especially
any
of
country,
about
of
inland,
Tarbert,
of
Berlin
country
to
north
total
to
Dublin
from
miles
Shannon
bears
all
twenty
then the
came
Dublin—a
Northern
bureaucrats,
one
of
which
does
seldorf
to
inside
we
Ireland®®
down
back
miles
about
of
1856
is
and
I the
developed
constabulary,
who
handcuffs.
are
centuries,
its
ruins, the oldest the latest from the
94
ENGELS
nineteenth—with
every
are
after
all
churches;
houses
peasants.
of
neighbourhood
never Whole
people
tion
and
still
even
desert it
Galway,
and
the
mostly and
by
a
has lot
of
luxuriant especially in
pastures, of
one
which,
big
can
are
the
are
there
at
ruins
have
appearance.
mountains
and
bogs
is
gradually
is
an of
cattle,
away
cleared In
but
the
south-
there
is
also
that again fine Dublin there is
forest
see,
There
cultivated,
been
bourgeois
the
south
least
excellently
7
the
land
Clare,
I
emigra-
this. The
fields. County
Here
lie
almost
Famine,
land; beyond Tipperary, and towards
wonderfully
land
the In
Limerick
farmers,
Scottish
in
1846. reality.6
them
are
who
accomplished
wants.
better.
towards
a
seen
be
the
since
tangible
lawyers.
have
in
peasant
ruined
among
there
mostly
together
somewhat
are
and
such
landlords,
there,
to
have
1800,
after
deserted
1856
ancient
especially
with
been
could
nobody
country
there
only
lesser
living
cattle
hills
the
west
the
which is
have
castles;
west,
covered
23,
May
most
The
and
the
of
is
devastated,
of
clearances
not
utter
whole
famine
are
parks
only
are
that
period.
churches
Galway,
which
of
villages
splendid
1100,
The
of
most thought
houses,
intervening
MARX.
TO
coming
into
the
hands
farmers.
country was completely ruined by the English wars of conquest from 1100°® to 1850 (for in reality both the wars and the state of siege lasted as long as that). It has been established as a fact that most of the ruins were produced by destruction during the wars. The people itself has got its The
peculiar
character the
fanaticism
own
their
country.
realised. the
respect;
indeed
exclusively,
to
dogs.
achieve
something,
politically been
nation
and
supplying casual
comes
emigration
the and
now, England,
labourers,
How and
often
every
as
converted
everyone America,
pimps,
have
into
the
of
with in
population
started
they
have
been
Australia,
being
superior
Irish
an
in
predominantly,
the
knows,
pickpockets,
now
compete
the
consistent
Irish
at home is
means
with until
character
time By
That
cannot
he
go on
national
longer
Saxon!
equipped Celtic
their
are no
that
will
industrially.
artificially
the
for
all
for
they
knows
almost
gone
have
Ireland
who
and
that
feel
Irishman
Englishman,
every is
The
this,
from
fellows
out
crushed,
oppression
utterly fulfil
the
etc.,
with
swindlers,
to
they
impovenshed function
of
prostitutes, beggars
and
ENGELS
MARX.
TO
other
rabble.
23,
May
1856
95
Impoverishment
characterises
the
aristocracy
too. The landowners, who everywhere else have become bourgeoisified, are here reduced to complete poverty. Their country-seats are surrounded by enormous, amazingly beautiful parks, but all around is waste land, and where the money is to come from it is impossible to sce. These fellows are droll enough to make your sides burst with laughing. Of mixed blood, mostly tall, strong, handsome chaps, they all
wear
enormous
themselves
around and
the
the
an
makes
live
moustaches
country dread
haven’t
the
Bonaparte
ways
attempted
over soon.
of
a penny,
and
about
I shall
by
colonels,
pleasures,
are
Estates
means
and
this,
How
sorts
noses,
Roman
retired
of
Encumbered
country—repression
come
colossal
airs
all
after
they
of the
Concerning
this
military
false
inquiry,
in
under
laden
travel
if
with
debts,
Court.®?
which
England
shortly
if
zwischen Bd.
I,
in F.
Der
Briefwechsel
Engels
Stuttgart,
und
1913
K.
Marx,
rules before
you
won’t
it? Yours,
Published
one
and
corruption—long
write
give
Translated
from
the
F.E.
German
Karl
From
THE
QUESTION
to
According
grasps
after
principles Ionian free
very
oracle only
public
liberty;
of home,
moment,
Daily January
in
Tribune
6,
No.
1859
in
India
and
Bull
must
giving
New-York 5526,
IONIAN
we
1f
Ireland, enslave
prove
them
to only
abroad.
the
in
the
facts,
the
according
newspaper
to
that
Thus,
vent to his virtuous system at Paris, he
of
he
Square,’!
adhere
Printed
©
ISLANDS’
Printing-House order to educate
but,
like while
The
in
John
against Bonaparte’s spy introducing it at Dublin.
Published
THE
OF
colonies
Islands,
at
his
Marx
at
be this
indignation is
himself
to
the
text
Karl
THE
Marx
IN
EXCITEMENT
IRELAND
London,
A Government, Ministry, a party getting
rid
When
installing
doubtless, in
up
past
Ireland;
principles, his
had
and
than
to
mind
versatile
atone
the
for
name
his
old
connections. Lord
Derby,
blunders
which
Street,
a
into
byword
hesitate
in
Ireland,
for
Attorney-General
one moment
not bound
would
its
of
Downing
converted
his
Whiteside,
at
himself
made
times
Mr.
old
1858
like the present British always better succeed in
representing, in decay, will
its
of
24,
Dec.
to the 2 But,
flinging
him to the Orange Lodges.‘ then, Lord Derby’s advent to power gave, simultaneously, the signal for one coterie of the governing class to rush in and fill the posts just vacated by the forcible ejection of the other wind
the
coterie.
oaths
The
formation
consequence
among
a
become
that
that
all
Thus,
resuscitate
was
Castle,/3
and
landlordism,
couple,
course,
seriously
4-226
places
still
by
share
club
should
a party
marching
having
past,
the
united
in
intrigues, the
be
name
under
nothing
together
involved
Cabinet
and, loaves
the
divided
which
has torn
a banner common above and
save
all,
the
fishes
of
Eglinton, the Don Quixote who wanted to tournaments of chivarly in money-mongering to be enthroned Lord Lieutenant at Dublin Lord Naas, notorious as a reckless partisan of
worthy
their
Derby
Lord the
England,
with
and fact
to
resolution
office.
Irish
still
meaningless, in
the
Government
crew
motley
to tatters, but reminiscences of firm
of
was
to
arcades
enjoined
crotchets,
be
ambo, to
by behave
made
his
on
leaving
their
First
superiors
properly,
Minister.
London, and
to by
The
were,
of
have
done
no
capni-
98
KARL
cious
to
pranks
path
across
good
intentions,
Dublin
the
clearance
whatever
their
been
officially
ment
itself
as
to
burning
of
their
individual
its
for
the
arrival
that
himself
down
were
be.
men, had
Orangeism
loyalty,
denounce
had place,
those
of
the
this
at the
cottages,
of
inmates
position might
to
dancing
his
poor
intruding
compelled
on
with
as party necessities men in the wrong
intentions
snubbed been
once
paved
baubles
Naas,
the
ratio. Yet instal wrong
at
Eglinton’s
doubt,
satisfy
proper to
Lord
Vice-royal Lord
unhousing
falsified
had
the
of
not
do
while
estates,
of
merciless
necessities
employers.
determined
proceeding at the forced Lord Derby
party
vista mind;
was
Castle,
the
own was, we
their
channel
childish
wholesale and
the
his
before
upset
MARX
Govern-
organisation
very unceremoniously it was told that it was no any earthly purpose, and that it must vanish. The mere advent of a Tory Government, the mere occupancy of Dublin Castle by an Eglinton and a Naas revived the hopes of the chop-fallen Orangemen. The sun shone again on the ‘true blues’; they would again lord it over the land as in the days of Castlereagh, and the day for taking their revenge had illegal,
and
longer
good
visibly
dawned.
and,
one
last,
temerarious
Lieutenant,
placing
turning,
through
trade
the
of
was
world
provocateur
spy,
Ireland
announcing
societies
were
Kenmare, from
annex tives
an
the
which, other
side
Skibbereen,
secret of
nocturnal on; from
themselves
arrests the
took south-west
and
in
perjurer,
Counties
and
rewards,
the
Erin. of
The
secret fellow,
at
Killarney,
of
Killarney,
a
formidable
with
filibusters
boys of
not
only,
institutions’, Consequently, of
agent
the
infamous
intended
Lord
siege,
of
detection
members
English Republic.
the
of
Green
apprentice
some
morning
fine
and
in
an
when
Atlantic,
the
street
£50
understanding
the
Downing
a state
in
the
for
as
weak,
one
trade
apothecary’s
Bright, to ‘‘Americanise Ireland to the model busied
say) the
and
bungling, of
until
profitable
father
in
the
proclamation
£100
of
posted,
own
Bantry,
conspiracy Mr.
hardly
his
to
rewards
O’Sullivan,
denounced
a
informer,
most
led
other, by
(so
means
the the
placards named
the
startled
the
into
they
representatives
to
position
false
the
step,
by
Step
therefore,
from
at
for
Kerry
and
place, mysterious informations the conspiracy hunting spread
like
but to detecCork,
went to the
THE
IN
EXCITEMENT
north-east,
masters,
and
alarmed
attorneys’ the streets
through the
scenes
farcical
Monaghan,
worse
thing
judicial
99
IRELAND
occurred
and
and
the
veil
was
Bail
became
were
secret, copies of the arrests had been made
kept
stipendiary
seats
judicial all
Ireland
to at
the
be
up
in the
of
mystery
the
of
were
the
might
defendants
believe
order
magistrates
paraded
What
rendered
cases, the
and
of
said,
Rea,
what
Mr.
remarked
Dublin
left
and
all
the the
and
counsel
to
their
from
Castle,
the
has
which refused,
down
respect
with
Constitution
inquisitions
regularly
up
whirling
the
midnight
on
informations
were
over
thrown all
school-
of
clerks
jails.
day,
of
County
dozen
in,all
ante-chambers
Belfast,
British
some
declined
surprises arbitrary
the
the
merchants’
locked
was
proceedings.
saw
Belfast
clerks
in
that
of the
for
place, this
Belfast
“I
last
week.” Now,
through
that
had
agents, of
and
given
way
who,
the it
ing
its
in
was
the
Phoenix
whole
it
more awful to may be Express,
and
disgust,
in editor.
There events, it thought
from
4*
the
rumours the
own
its
may exist is a very fit
to
men
of
there
Government,
stifle
Peep-o’-Day
new,
murders
thing affair,
this
never end boys
of
extend-
the
north-east
from
the
American-
Ribbonism75;
of
unknown,
and
of
The
Dublin
day
by
day
their
so
Daily
treats To
own upon
depended the eighteenth
combined
to
wage
by
at
all itself
ashes.
As
secret century,
war
and of
Phoenix Club, but since the Government its
its
graves,
disposed
as a
in
its
men
armed
place.
from
being
the
is driven
Government
taking
Phoenix
At
to
committed,
return
against
places.
conspiracy,
quite the
shifts
killed
a
their
revival
meetings
columns such small
a
manoeuvres organ, which
midnight
Ribbonism, its existence spirators. When, at the Protestant
The
and
issued
was
it
quite
Government
iuding,
the
south-west
Ireland,
of
that.
judged false
intense
has
all
for
mystery,
this
of
dangerous
the
Then
something
to
protest the
surface
is
anxiety
reputation
the
from
Club.’4
the
readers,
ma
that
ramifications
now
their
pretended
ising
the
to the pressure of its credulous Irish turn, were mere playthings in the hands how to get out of the awkward fix
once
at
hubbub
more
their
losing
over but
this
Orangemen,
without first,
all
more
transpires
to
conthe
against
100
KARL
the
in
Catholics
the
the
boys
merged
own
days,
the
Ribbon
the
by
Eglinton
Lord
its
fill
may,
societies. would
as
mushrooms.
The
call
it,
they
clearing
of
the
are
tenants vermin
is
secret
land
to by
part,
their
combine disposed
a
anything
effecting
beyond
and
societies
no
as
experiment small
more
by
for
or,
cotters;
The
and
native
ado
than
wretches,
on
formation
of
the
land,
present agrarian
confederated
despairing
the
may place
producing
economical
resistance
over
as
At
of
the
with
The
feeble
scattered
are
mouths.
of
housemaid.
attempt
societies,
useless
of
be the
the
taken
to
except such
woodland against
for
life,
steps
partisans.
Ireland
of
of
Constabulary,
producing
accuse
Orangeism,
Ribbonism,
Ireland
of
our
in
condition
Irish
in
extermination
of
last,
Orangemen
own
their
landlords
war
fiendish
at
revive
Ireland as to
judicious
its
the
of
the
disavowed
Dublin
societies
accuse
the
fact, of
society
Peep-o’Defenders trans-
extraordinary
the
with
1791,
The
head
secret
To be
they
ranks
no
exist
in of
opposing
When,
lost
voluntarily.
inferior
there
a
having
attempts officers at the
English
in
Government
present
the
When,
Ribbonmen.
Society,
itself
the
Orangeism,
into
British
dissolved
Ireland,
up.
into
themselves
formed
of
sprang
Defenders’®
Day
north
MARX
powerless
demonstrations
for
individual
of
vengeance. But
mere
of
airy
press
mob
The
with
shilling
into
the
detection
county rural
be
detected.
From
the
immediately
enrol
swear
blood-money. the
suffice Sir
To
effect
to
Robert
characterise
on
them
one
quote Peel
to
in
the
of
passage House
and
to
entrails who,
delegates,
travel
administer the
body
to
race
Government
from
a
create
the
every
through
the
denounce pocket
Irish
the
informers
rewards,
speech
Commons:
the
of
and
of
for
transforming
oaths,
gallows,
this
of
by
reward
blacklegs
members, them
a sure
than
rise
districts,
and
service,
revolutionary
out
held
shape
a
is
sergeant is no more sure gin some of the Queen’s
his
is
into
victims,
giving
societies
to
themselves
and
Ireland
premiums
secret
Irish
there
the in
in
after
recruiting
Queen’s
of
societies
succeed
nothing.
his
hunted
Orangeism,
may
Government
the
the
conspiracy
invention
the
to
the
if
it will
delivered
by
THE
“When ted
a
offered
Chief
can
and
and
Mr.——,
and
Clonmel;
reward it
be
of
he
was
There
a
was,
by
£500
believed,
employed
placing He
this
side
two
men
on
the very man who came and gave their execution, and with these hands the
Published Daily January
sum
in
Tribune
11,
of
The No.
1859
£2,000
New-York 5530,
to
that
monster
who
at
each
each
each
Suir,
from
escape
the
murdered,
that
bribed
guineas
River
road,
foully
éf
two
the
of
crime,
discovery
miscreant
was
Castle
men
four
each
therefore,
was commita deadly re-
murder
Mr.——had
on
heinous
the
for the
A
Clonmel.
road
a
Ireland,
of
Secretary
was impossible. was so shocked
country And
a
him.
to
victim
101
IRELAND
Carrick-on-Suir
toward
murder
Carrick
his
was
I
between
venge to
IN
EXCITEMENT
the
Government
the
murderers. murderers
led to Dublin
the information which I paid in my office in in
human
Printed of
the
of
the
four
of the
and
shape.”’
according
newspaper
to
the
text
Karl
From
POPULATION,
There must be social system which its
misery,
and
numbers.
It
true
rotten
in
enough
its
that,
years,
number
committed
to
amounted
the
people
number
quite
in
Offenders’
which
sentences
working
as
fate
so
may
tion. dark
not
of
only
professional
Thus,
historian, its
far
thousands
of
itself law of
or as
crimes
that views
it
has the of
the Act
to
being
men,
and
punish lawyers been Catholic
human
is
the
fallen
off, of
to in
certain This
tone
but
some second
Act
of
pass
prisoners.
economas the
of
but,
it depends
to
violations
of
difference
of
on
the
decides
of
not
society.
Law
improvise it, and the work in this direc-
to
remarked the
if
to
legislator,
moral
of
the
the
of
and
Juvenile
Justice
offspring
only.
apt
nature,
a
crime,
to
the
indifferent,
very
clergy
1858;
in
testifies,
crime, justly
1854
and,
stamp
transgressions from
in
Magistrates
the of
Offenders’
society
which
decrease
consent
the
control
official
nomenclature,
Police
with
total
Criminal
generally
the
Juvenile
on
degree
are
law
the
The
attributed
instance,
the
periods,
beyond the
of
rules
the
of
agencies
some
short
greatly
jurisdiction; of
1858.
17,855
exclusively
first
authorises
for
Violations
the
operation
to
apparent
British
in
the
also
be
trial,
down
This
to
to
1855 for
had
is in
Act‘?
to
1855,
1854,
if
sunk
ratio.
changes
instance,
its
same
since
technical
had
convicted
of
the
however,
ical
29,359,
the very core of without diminishing
in
even more rapidly than in we compare the year 1855 seems to have occurred a
there from
crime
PAUPERISM
wealth
crimes
with the preceding sensible decrease of of
AND
CRIME
something increases
increases
is
Marx
by
medieval
introduced
by
an
eminent
times, its
with
influence
POPULATION,
into
criminal
given which
legislation,
say,
to
crime
per
75
cent,
has
nature,
1s
ruler,
instead but
a
more
created
demand
for
crimes
nature. following
Irish
the
of
the
tabular
say
by
50,
harmonise according
misrule,
is
no act consequence of
than
for-
on of
has
that
the
a
statements
in
even
by
and
fact
with
to which
this
Irish
part
be,
of
famine,’8
worked
may
Kingdom
responsible
circumstances
that
However
United
can we
again,
labour,
the
England,
How
British is,
of
decreased,
combination Irish
part
only
slang of
It
simply
general
the
Ireland.
shortcomings?
in
has
seriously
public-opinion
and
103
PAUPERISM
sins. Strange
the
AND
CRIME
the
an
favourable
this the
Irish
for
happy
British exodus,
to
change
significance
cannot
be
the of
misunder-
stood.
I.—Crimes —Committed
1844 1845 1846 1847 1848 1849 1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857
1858
...
Males
Ireland. for
Trial—
Females
Total
Convicted
14,799
4,649
19,448
8,042
12,807
3,889
16,696
7,101
14,204
4,288
18,492
8,639
23,552
7,657
31,209
15,233
28,765
9,757
38,522
18,206
31,340
10,649
41,989
21,202
22,682
3,644
31,326
17,108
17,337
7,347
24,684
14,377
12,444
5,234
17,678
10,454
10,260
4,884
15,144
8,712
7,937
3,851
11,788
7,051
6,019
2,993
9,012
5,220
5,097
2,002
7,099
4,024
5,458
1,752
7,210
3,925
4,708
1,600
6,308
3,350
|
...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
Years
in
104
KARL
IY.— Paupers
Years
No.
in
Ireland.
No.
of
Parishes
}
MARX
Paupers
Years
of
Parishes
|Paupers
1849
880
82,357
1854...
883
78,929
1850
880
79,031
1855...
883
79,887
1851
88]
76,906
1856...
883
79,973
1852
889
75,111
1857...
883
79,217
1853
882
75,437
1858..
883
79,199
Published
Daily
in
The
Tribune
September
16,
New-York
No.
1859
5741,
Printed of
the
according
newspaper
to
the
text
Karl
From
THE
Marx
IN
CRISIS
9
ENGLAND’
r
as
Today, which
fifteen
years
to
undermine
threatens
system.
economic food
the
of
working
1846 big
and
population the
others
are
party;
the
one
Repeal
known. At
the
landed
of
the
Corn reproduction
the
potato
and
and
the
that
of
population
starved,
while
time,
English
was
aristocracy
most profitable Laws8® ensured
its
results
same
the
only
English
1845
Irish
victory
the
of
whom
of
entire
the
of
The
The
some
her
almost
part rot.
catastrophe of
blight
with
Atlantic.
English
were
potato
life
promoted
of
the
of for
well the
calamity
sacrifice
of
millions,
across
enormous
basis
two
by fled
Trade
root
foundation
is known
the
a
faces
considerable
when
Irish
catastrophe
decreased
a
of
England the
as
Potatoes
Irish
struck
ago,
this
Free-
compelled
to
monopolies,
and
a
and
sounder
the
working
wider
maintenance
of
the
millions. What dominant ing
branch
depends
which
is
the
1861
and
that
million
people
on
plant
a
of
the
a mass
of
whole
England
few
areas
Scotland
and
of
the
population
Asia
or to
was more
3,061,117, than
live
cotton
is
world. for
Scotland
According
of
True,
the its On
clothing and
process-
the
Scotland
Neither
material America,
while
the
its
Ireland.
of
of
industry.
disease.
of
is to
On
population
5,764,543,
only
cotton
industry.
population
cotton
in
agriculture,
population
providing
areas
the
present
any
contracted
extensive
than
in the
Irish Britain’s
Great
Ireland
of
to
subsistence
census,
monopoly other
the
of
indirectly
not
of
the
greater
two-thirds
was
four
directly plant
production the
contrary,
thrives
Africa.
The
on
or has the
no such
cotton
106
KARL
states
monopoly of the slave-owning is not natural, but historically simultaneously industry on the
the
Suddenly
of
English
the
harvest
source
of
to
ports.
this
to the
,
P ub l is h e d
in
No v e m b e r
6
and is
Die
P resse
1 861
off
by
its
this
export the
be in
No
the favour of
., 3 05
ports
of
this
year's
secessionists’
main
decision
compulsive
not
moreover,
cotton herself from driven to break through
war on
mainstay
the of
imparts
and,
cotton
English
blockades
the
voluntarily
the
fetch
to
declare scales
Union
American Union grew and developed
threatens
Confederation
merely
cotton
come
England
by force, sword on
the
blockade
to
the
It of
War
Civil
prevent thereby cut
and
of
shaped.
to
income,
bale
England
While
States
cotton force
American
the
of
the monopoly market....
industry.
Southern
single
with world
MARX
Union, and thus the slave-owning
T rans l a te d
f rom
to export a to force
the
southern
the
blockade her
to throw states.
the
G erman
Karl
From
This ties,
to
ENGLISH
time
it
is
tastelessly the
up
wives
their
display
of
not
cries
of
jewels who
and
comparable that
provide
not
ladies
far
set
any
parliamentarian
distress
of
the
Irish
women,
not
do
and
own
lips
in
who,
the
starve
in
no
slaves)
motion;
because
and
as
have
a
elicited
single
echo
landownership.8!
a
ened
to
kind
take
or
in
of
a
land
where
keep
of
Lords,
on
the
free
ladies These
ladies of
themselves They
have
that
could
at
portion
the
that of
like
the
yet Her
rights
of
That
Orleans!
far
into
as and
absolute
were
war
Erin, house
from
Commons
New
of
turmoil
and
invasion,
the
too
is
enlight-
goddesses
the
flames
like
invented
a new
and
of
the safe
have
been
by
women
slave-owners
population
consists
the
invented
only
of
or sugar or tobacco merchants, who do cwes of antiquity did. When their away from New Orleans or hidden in their ladies ran out into the streets to spit in the
cotton
had
at
kind
the
slaves
back-rooms,
tongues
a
slave-owners,
husbands face
part in the to throw
Saguntum.§2
shop-keepers,
not
the
matter.
heroism,
of
women
by
Tatar
from
But
different
Olympus,
women
a
Government—homilies
Majesty’s
quite
were
the
of
Green
there
a
was
it
who
eat
for
concentration of small tenancies in half-naked into the streets and chased if
a way
occasion
progressive are thrown home
beau-
in
they
the
women
English
are
they
yellow
Orleans,
humanism—formerly
The
then
AMERICA
except
Mexicans,
natura, aristocratic
(but
so
New
from
with
Charleston.
Lancashire have
ladies
old
in
British
of
ports
the
the
of
AND
HUMANISM
adorned
slaves
Marx
run these
as
victorious
them
or,
the
Unionist
generally,
troops,83
like
to
stick
Mephistopheles,
out
their
to
make
108
KARL
“obscene
accompanied
gestures’
megaeras
thought
they
would
with
be
MARX
invectives.
to
allowed
be
These
insolent
“with
impunity”.
was
That
their
tion in which street-walkers Butler,
a
though
English
analogy
with
has
Butler
General
a
issued
proclama-
he announced that they would be treated like if they continued to behave like street-walkers.
studied lereagh,85 streets at
heroism.
he all.
lawyer
by
would
properly.84
on
imposed
have
prohibited warning to the
Butler’s
made
the
Earl
ridiculous
and
odious
of
Carnarvon,
steps
what
to
them J.
Cast-
foot
in the
New
of
Walsh
of
both
expected
Washington,
and
December
185186
even
dead
his
shot the
ladies
vent their peasants,
only,
(on and
(who
Orleans
a
played
same was an
even wrath
own and
artisans,
their and
spite
other
on
coup
d’etat
the
Indeed,
not
rabble
with
of
Zouaves8” )
knowledge declared be
by that
moreover
ladies,
even
ordinary
for
were
“ladies”?
by
Viscount
should
Butler,
Government who,
previous
“‘infamy’’.
affronted
Palmerston,
some
raped
without
the
the
occasion
of
chastised
by
sensitive
sensitive
slaves,
name
Palmerston
were
and
Mr.
the
disavowed
which
back
in
recognised
others
that
warning who
and
be
very
the
Queen’s
colleagues,
Butler’s
to
admiration
‘“humane”’
behind
Russell
him
take
and
under
set
“ladies”
Sir
Ireland),
to
intended
Both
‘humanism’.
and
it
in
Ireland
Gregory, who demanded the recognition of the Confederation already a year ago, so morally indignant, that the Earl in the Upper House, and the knight and man “without a handle to his name” in the Lower House have questioned the government
on
role
not seem to have Otherwise, by
does
profession,
Law
Statute the laws
to
allowed
Unionist
troops,
impunity!
It
“infamous”.
Published
June
20,
in
Die
1862
Presse
No.
168,
Translated
from
the
German
is
Kar!
From
XXV
CHAPTER
Marx
OF
CAPITAL,
I88
VOLUME
r 5.
Section
Hlustrations
of
Law
General
Accumulation
Capitalist
Ireland
(f.)
In to
the
of
concluding
Ireland.
The
First,
main
The
it
1866,
in
facts
diminution
must the
of
Ireland
of
1851,
in
5,850,309;
1801.
the
we
section,
population
8,222,664; to
this
had
to
began
the
1841,
in
to
millions,
with
reached
6,623,985; its
year,
famine
that Ireland, in less than twenty years, lost more than its people.* Its total emigration from May, 1851,
of
1865,
1,591,487:
numbered
the
emigration
1861,
in
to
nearly
_
a moment
for
case.
had,
dwindled 5!/9
travel
during
level
in
1846,
so
5/16
ths
to July, the
years TableA
LIVE-STOCK
Horses Year
1860 1861
Cattle
Total
.. .
Total
Nunrber
Decrease
Number
—
619,811
Decrease
Increase
-
3,606,374
614,232
5,579
3,471,688
134,686
602,894
11,338
3,254,890
216,798
1863...
579,978
22,916
3,144,231
110,659
1864.
562,158
17,820
3,262,294
--
118,063
547,867
14,291
3,493,414
—
231,120
1811,
6,084,996;
1862...
1865...
*
1821,
Population
6,869,544;
of
Ireland,
1831,
1801,
7,828,347;
5,319,867 1841,
persons;
8,222,664.
—
-—
KA RL
110
MA RX
C ont i nued
S heep
Y ea r
T o tal
T ota l
nu m b e r
D ec rea se
,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,,
18 60 ;
3 5 4 2 08 0
18 61]
3 55 6 05 0
, ,, ,, -
1 8 63 | 3 3 08 2 04 ]
was
inhabited
solely
fore,
8 6 86 6
— !|
58 7 3 7 ]
1 058 480
8 978
—)
3 2 1 8 01 ]
1 2 9 9 893
to
their
The nied it of
a over
Pigs
in
in
of
to
15
above
was
naturally
acres—
mass
the
of
products.
For
years
5
the
from
emigrated than
table
!/3
and
a
of
accompaour purpose,
1861-1865
during
absolute
number
the
million.
it results:—
Cattle
Sheep
Pigs
Absolute
Absolute
Absolute
Absolute
Decrease
Decrease
Increase
Increase
71,944
112,960
146,662
28,821*
turn
result
to
cattle
for
1865,
there-
fall,
Horses
back.
acres
109,000,
under
farms
of
From
30
a
120,000,
fell
population
more
by
us now
The
the
of
half-a-million
the
subsistence *
farms
suppression
consider
sank
From
Let
the
all
number
acres,
30
—
2 41 4 1 3
52,990.
15
of
over
—
centralisation.
to
people
further
to
decrease
suffices
which
of
The by
holdings
holdings
52 282
— |{
1851-1861,
of
number
—!
half-a-million.
from of
decrease
by
than
that
due
—
1 067 458
number
total
the
—
—}
the
whilst
1 102 042 |
1 47 928
fell,
61,000,
—
16 9 03 0
1 2 7 1 07 2
1 15 4 3 2 4
houses
1851-1861,
,,, ,,, , , ,, ,, ,, ,, ,
—|
13 9 7 0 !
more
increased
|I ncrease
—}
3 68 8 7 42
1861-1865
| D ecrea se
99 918
1 8 6 4 | 3 3 6 6 941 186 5 !
| num b er
| I ncrease
—
186 2 | 3 45 6 132
1.e.,
Pigs
would
Thus:
agriculture, and
be
1,299,893,
but
men.
for
found
yet
1865,
in
Sheep
in
which
1858,
In
more
yields
the
1,409,883.
but
in
1856,
of
table
following
unfavourable
3,688,742,
means
the
if
we
went
3,694,294.
is
T AL C A PI
, ., . I CH
VOL
111
XXV
Table
INCREASE
OR
AND
Cereal
IN
DECREASE
Green
Crops
THE
IN
GRASS
UNDER
CROPS
ACREAGE
and
Grass
Crops
AREA
B
Flax
Clover
Total
Culti-
vated
Land
Year
De-
De-
Crease|
crease
Acres
In-
De-
Acres}
In-
crease
creaS2
Acres|
De- |_
crempe
Acres}
In-
crease
Acres|
De-
Acres}
In-
crease
crease]
Crease}
Acres
{Acres
jAcres
1861]
15,701
|36,974
—
47,969)
—
—
19,271)
81,373
—
1862)
72,734
|74,785
—
—
6,623
—
2,055
138,841
—
1863
1144,719
|19,358
—
—
7,724
—
63,922
|92,431
1864
{122,437
| 2,317
—
—
|47,486
—
87,761
—
1865|
72,450;
—
1861-|428,041
—
25,241
—
{108,193
{68,970
—
—
{50,159
—-—
|82,834|
{122,850
— 10,493
28,39
—
530,55
—
65
calculated
the
compared
with
its
wheat,
Crops,
potatoes, parsnips,
In the heading
year
the
heading
of
1865,
“‘grass
101,543
acres.
decrease
in
we
cereals
of
potatoes was tion increased
Cereal
peas;
and
beet-root,
127,470 additional land’’, chiefly because
waste
and
If
beans,
The
Crops
the
Green
oats,
acres
unoccupied’’,
compare
1865
with
246,
qrs.,
of
667
29,892
barley,
came area
the
decreased
1864, the
decrease
its
capitalists.
in
reflected
the
remembered those
of
that
Schedules State
rise
the C.
the
and
and
of
fall
D.
includes incomes
and incomes
fundholders,
farmers,
Schedule
farmers),
profits—i.e., include
larger
E.,
in of
&c.
the
lawyers,
which employés,
no
purse
in the
with
the
so-called
in
cultiva-
agricultural of
It
is
may
be
exception
of
Income-tax.
(profits
also of
the
their
the
industrial
a
is
were
of
446,398
by
there
48,999
which
&c.:
under under
tons, although the area in 1865. [See Table C.| From the movement of population and produce of Ireland, we pass to the movement landlords,
car-
cabbages,
&c.
“‘bog
166,605
wheat,
rye,
mangolds,
year, as
separate
each
for
predecessor.
barley,
turnips,
vetches,
the
increase
immediate
oats,
include
rots,
or
decrease
It
“‘professional”’
doctors,
&c.;
special
details
officers,
State
and
are
the
given,
sinecurists,
KARL
112
INCREASE
OR
IN
DECREASE
THE
AREA
UNDER
MARX
CULTIVATION,
PRODUCT
Acres
of
Cultivated
or
Increase
Land
1865
Decrease,
Product
per
Acre
Product
1864
Wheat.
Oats.
Barley
. ... . .
| 276,483
Rye.
1864 |1865
266,989
9,494;
Wheat,
13.3|
13.0
12.1;
12.3
15.9)
14.9
cwl.
{1,814,886
{1,745,228
172,700
177,102
|
69
658]
cwt.
Oats,
4,402
Barley, cwt.
...
Bere.
1865
8,894
1,039,724
Potatoes
| Bere,
cwt.
16.4|
14.8
eye,
cwt.
8.5}
10,4
4.1
3.6
10.3)
9.9
10.5]
13.3
1,197
10,091]
1,066,260;
26,536
Potatoes, tons
337,355
Turnips
.
Mangold-
wurzel
334,212
3,143]
Turnips, tons
14,073
14,389
316
Mangoldwurzel, tons
..
31,821
Cabbages
Flax.
Hay....
*
the
|301,693
data
estimated
curred
1,678,493
of
and
in
the
68,924
put
Ireland,
laid
area
before for
the
under
cultivation
Parliament
year
Flax,st.
{(14lb)]
Dublin,
green
show,
25.2
1866’’.
[Note
as
materials Tables
These
to
2nd
compared
tumips,
acres.
of
the
for
the
showing
are
statistics
edition. with
An
1.8
16}
Dublin’’,
Ireland.
134,915
crops,
the
from Abstracts,
annually. of
tons
|Hay,
Statistics,
1872
cultivation
of
together
General
seq., and “Agricultural average produce, &.,
statistics in
are
text
the
Statistics,
et
1860,
decrease
50,260}
34.2
The
official
9.3 | 10.4
Cabbages,
251,433
|1,609,569]
official,
1,801
tons
“Agricultural
years
33,622;
The
a
1871,
increase
mangold-wurzel,
ocand
C A PI T AL
, ., . 1
VO L
CH
113
X XV
Table
PER
AND
ACRE,
TOTAL
PRODUCT
1865
OF
COMPARED
WITH
1864
or
Decrease,
C
or
Increase Decrease,
Total
Product
1865
r 1864
1865
Increase
1865
Qrs.
0.3
875,782
0.2
7,826,332
7,659,727”
166,605
”
”
732,017
”
29,892
”
1.6
15,160
”
13,989
”
1,171
”
12,680
”
18,364
ts.
4,312,388
0.4
like;
a
”
147,284
=”
191,937
”
| 44,653
”
350,252
=”
52,877
st.
2,607,153
ts.
decrease
in
for
14,000;
grass,
barley
clover,
wheat
shows 285,000
244,000;
228,000.
1872, of
decrease
of
2,600
236,000
horses,
under
and
vetches,
decrease:—1868,
increase
area
the
acres; For 80,000
pigs.|
rye, last 1869,
1872
”
4,000;
for
years
The the
280,000;
we
horned
wheat
potatoes,
30,000.
5
st.*
461,554”
cultivation
rape-seed, the
for
ts.
24,945
ts.
3,068,707
”
165,976
st.
39,561
ts.
446,398
3,301,683
64,506
oats,
34,667;
ts.
3,865,990
297,375
0.2
ars.
5,684
{|
=”
1.1
9.0
”°
3,467,659
2.8
tion
”
qrs.
48,999
761,909
0.51
acres;
826,783”
1.0
1.9
the
Ors.
”
find, cattle,
of
66,632;
soil
under
following 1870,
in
flax,
cultiva-
stages
259,000,
round 68,609
16,000
numbers, sheep,
of
1871,
and
an a
K A RL
114
MA RX
Table
INCOME-TAX
THE
ON
1860
SUBJOINED
1861
IN
INCOMES
1862
|
THE
POUNDS
1863
D
STERLING
1864
1865
Sched-
ule
A.
Rent
of
Land
13,003,554
{12,893,829
13,398,934
13,494,091)
13,470,700]/13,801,616
Sched-
ule
B.
Farmers, Profits
| 2,765,387)
2,773,644
| 2,937,899
2 938,923
2,930,874
}
|2
946,072
Sched-
ule
D.
Industrial,
&c.,
ree
4,891,652
4,836,203
EJ22,962,885]
22,998,394
4,858,800
4,846,497)
4,546,147|
23 658,63
1123,236,298/23
4,850,199
ota
Sched-
ules
A.
to
Under in
distribution
of
was the
average 4.58.
annual whilst,
The
years
the
1864
930,340*
increase in
of
income
same
the
period,
table
following
(with
profits
the
for
574
0.93;
only
it of
farmers)
Table
the
was
Britain,
Great
the
D.
Schedule
1853-1864
from
23,597
exception
and
shows of
those
1865:—[See
E.| England, and
duction,
death
But
with
England,
is
marked it
yields
a
drain
at
of
by
off
corn,
a
would
industrial,
as
population
present
an
only wide
wool,
capitalist
developed
fully
with
pre-eminently
such
Ireland
which
a country
have
Ireland
has
agricultural!
channel cattle,
the
from
industrial
bled
to
suffered.
district country
and
pro-
of to
military
recrults.
out
866
The depopulation of Ireland has thrown much of the land of cultivation, has greatly diminished the produce of the
Tenth
Report
of
the
Commissioners
of
Inland
Revenue.
London,
C API T AL
, ., . VO L
S C HEDULE
D
.
115
XXV
I CH
Table
FR O M
I N CO ME
R EL A ND £ 6 0 ) IN I
(O V ER
PR O FI TS
1864
1865
£ Total
yearly
come
£
in-
4,368,610
of......
among persons.
divided
17,467 Yearly
... ....... ......
Remainder total
these
soil,**
” |2,418,833
”
1,194
”
1,010 121
” | 1,097,927 ” |1,320,906
” ”
1,044 150
” ”
” ” ”
spite
"
1n
with
The
total that
the
which
of
by
Ireland, making
this
throwing
up
of
to
cattle-
scarcely
as
not
worthy
of
Never-
rents
holdings
and
as
steadily
comprehensible. small
an
branches,
population,
latter
easily
its
retrogressions.
the
of
the is
by
122 ” 28 ” 3*”
devoted of
advance
numbers
the the
On
into
large
arable into pasture land, a larger part transformed into surplus-produce.
of
was
increased, income
appears
although
under
in
the
Schedule
the
preceding
diminishes
relatively
total D.
ones,
is
produce,
different
because
in
of
of
this
certain
law.
also
a century
for
area
some
interrupted
of
yearly
product
that
an
although
the
allowed
forgotten
others,
in
fall
rose, reason
surplus-produce
from
in
” ” ”
584,458 736,448 274,528
greater
about,
constantly the
95 ” 26 ” 3.”
the
of
brought
and
deductions
ed.
1,131
*
”
and the change whole produce
for
”»
430,535 646,377 262,819
in
hand,
soil
”
1,073,906 1,076,912
The
Tf
12,184
2,150,818
with
**
”
”
former.
*
” | 2,028,571
1,979,066
profits
table
11,321,
.|
farmers’
The
”
5,015
diminution,
mention,
the
4,703
*
has
absolute
one ones,
”
238,726
and,
theless,
222,575
.|
in-
breeding,
means
18,081
the
of
yearly
come
the
among persons.
divided
to-
Of the yearly talincome
of
4,669,979
income
over £60 and under £100...
Of
E
without the
and
as
a
England
half
as
much
constituents
of
the
per acre, has
allowing soil
that
it
must
indirectly its had
not
cultivators been
be
exported the
exhaust-
116
KARL
which
it
a
formed
money-value
of
this
rapidly
than
its
mass,
English
market-price
and
especially The
ers
without the
as
by
employed capital
total
decades
and
slowly,
it had
increased
Here,
process
and
a
that
far
middle
of
Note
to
apply, into
the
plague
product
mass
the the
of
a part
because
of
was
scattered,
employed
the
the
And,
the
two
last
constantly did
recurring
concentration
however
dwindling
is
eyes
which
small
its
population
the
conditions
the
the
so
of
overlooked decimation
was
the that
of
the
its
of
the
plague in
14th,
that
the
Malthusians.89
population this
whilst,
accompanied
1s
This
schoolmaster
and
fact
could
support
of
the
production
standard
excellent
depopulation.
belauded of
a
scale,
surplus-population,
by than
naivete
large
the
for
absolute
re-established
only
more
economy from
century
14th If
on a
and
nothing
the
bargain, and
own
springs
century,
nineteenth
of
production
the
during
and
to
experiment
the
a
agriculture,
rapidly
important
further:
produc-
of
formerly
develop.
orthodox
misery
equilibrium
more
great
our
than
by
for
that
the
If, with
means
outside
proportion
under
revealed,
wished
dogma:
20,
largely.
then,
is
in
were
more
constituents
increase,
last
than
commodity.
accumulated
the
the
capital.
with
much
individual
absolute
be
and
so
the
subsistence,
of
capital
increased,
Ireland
trade,
in
incorporation
diminished,
into
of
the
the
of
that
turned
and
by
more is a
agriculture
capital
fluctuations;
its
in
production
industry
of
also
and
value
producer
agriculture
of
concentrated in
own are no
serve
that
employment
that
employed
The
production
population,
in
means
the
own
its
the
of
their
more
yet rise
during
the
years.
10,
of
hand,
the
of
&c.,
wool,
last of
others,
of
consumed
mass
the
expanding
labour
meat,
other
increased
consequence
in
means means
scattered
the
On
surplus-produce of
during
themselves
decreased.
fraction,
MARX
it,
could of
the
naivete, after
followed
the
on
this side of the Channel, in England, enfranchisement and enrichment of the agricultural population, on that side, in France, *
As
greater
followed Ireland
population’”’,
Th.
is
and
more
as
the
promised
before
the
publication
regarded
Sadler,
servitude
land of
misery.* of his
the
“principle
work
on
of
popula-
CAPITAL,
I, CH.
VOL.
The
Irish
people,
but
country
it
next
years,
20
as,
e.g.,
of
killed
poor
not
did
an
an
sands
miles
year
troop next.
as
that
Years’
away
from
the
the
United
emigrates instead
one
Finally,
of
the
1s
a
it
every that
the
were
What
and
relative
surplus-population
wages
that
ers new
has
The
pace
kept
as
to
arable
than in increases
tion,
land
issued
2nd
his
edition,
individual
proves to
the
ed
to
*
more
Every
the
1829.
provinces, the
and
than
misery
number
emigration
by
the
the
of
edition
of
Between
1851
and
[Note
Irish
by
left
That
the
revolution
the
pace
the
the
French
its
relative
the
absolute change in
and
counties
Malthus
total
of
crops
decreases.
in
would
in inverse number
edition
of
of
Remedies”,
statistics
each have
ratio
lie of
formerly,
their
the
of
Ireland
green it
unused
Evils
a
agriculture of
with
were
comparison
individual
1874,
labour-
towards
in
production
that
by
is
1846;
before of
country
the
so
year.*
labourers
as
kept
but 1872-75.—Ed. |
to
births,
year
falls
that were formerly tilled, into grass-land, a great part
not as population,
there
French
2,325,922.
the
the
its
of
The
“Ireland,
Here,
of
it
after
oppression
The
bogs
book,
famous
exiles
money
at Table C shows that the must work yet more acutely
peat
and
London,
that
to
tion
simple.
large number of acres, are turned permanently
waste
the
thou-
of
anything,
as great
the
is forcing
emigration.
land
the
discov-
behind.
another
the
to-day
with
pasture
sums
replaced for
that
are
glance
with
The
England. In England the cultivation of with the breeding of cattle; in Ireland,
a
Whilst idle or
1s
facts
A
not,
people
surplus-population?
misery
has
did
genius
left
population
the
low,
that
surplus-population depopulation.
the
from
just
increased,
crisis.
has
freed
are
are
than
behind
the
along
home
branches
consequences
the
of
export trade. process, which does not simply population, but sucks out of it
the of
exodus
misery.
those
draws
lucrative
level
its
of
Ireland
the
a poog
send
States,
systematic
absolute
scene
of
Irish
spiriting
of
wealth
increasing,
decimate,
costing
of
The
production.
for
most
the
constantly
1,000,000
than
To
damage.
expenses one year,
a passing gap in year more people
make
only.
War,99
of
travelling
Thus,
forms
still
means new way
to
transplanted
every
exodus
altogether
of
devils
slightest
their
more
killed
the
Thirty
beings,
ered
1846
famine
it
the
human
117
XXV
of
the
province,
he
propor-
it, in
to
this.
amount-
emigrants
1872-75.—Ed.
[Note
]
118
KARL
become
of
smaller
and
not
do
8/10 and
service
of
with
a
the
they
fore
employs
part
requires
rose
relative it.
The
pedestal
for
are,
the
encounter industry,?!
own
its
ers.
increase gigantic
most
constant emigration
although
but
also
tradespeople between £60
is
*
2nd reach
“‘Reports
from
Labourers
in
Labourers
is
(Ireland).
the
to be
a
with
absorbed
by
forms
the
of
country.
labourers
we
Here,
of
domestic
over-work,
possesses labour-
not
destruc-
has
such
only
the
Poor
Ireland’’,
Return,
in
and
Law
exceed
etc.”,
8th
a
to
1870.
March,
agricultural the
of
Irish
a
government state of siege,
table
in
per
94.6
Murphy’s
cent
of
the
acres.
100
Inspectors
Dublin,
by
incomes
a
of
1870,
Social”,
5.4
Reports
Officials
artisans,
in
the
of
the
According
and
acres,
diminution
bayonets
edition.] 100
shopkeepers,
condition
found
by
in
the E.
(1870).**
Political
not
do
even
supernumerary
small
of
Hence in Table of
maintained
to
result
incomes
Inspectors
Industrial,
holdings **
the
Ireland
[Note
‘Treland
modern
fluctuations,
above
depopulation
would
statement
in
Law
which
great
armies
the
creating
for
the
as
generally. and £100
clear
labourers
tural
means
insignificant
a country with fully capitalistic production, it does not go on without reaction upon the home-market. The gap which causes here, limits not only the local demand for
developed
Poor
over
scattered
only price
population
system described which in underpayment and
linen-
the
beings
whose
of
and
sphere,
human
of
the
consequences
A
own
class
since
incessant
its
shirt-factories,
systematic
labour,
by
the
there-
men
other
agricultural
part,
again
Finally,
tive
mass
the
the
of
all
by
the
comparatively
within
other,
Ireland,
of
expansion
Like
the and
to
adult
few
a
about
crushed
capital,
who
up
before,
by
The
all
after
recruits
its
of
produces,
in
make
industry
1861-1866,
population
misery
for
spite
it constantly
absolute
great
population.
surplus-
new
these
are, one
managed
relatively in
in
the
of
industries,
an
one
altogether,
cotton
unknown
furnish
The
manufacture,
They
agriculture
continually
wage-labourers.
of
torce
among
acres—still
number.*
ot
an
of
cattle-breeding.
of
reckon
100
than
whole
degree
competition
extension
farmers—I
more
cultivate
ths
the
for
medium
MARX
on
the
See
Wages also
1861.
of
Agricul-
“Agricultural
[The
text
based
C A PI T AL
now
, ., . I CH
VOL
open,
tions
in
risen
per
per
week.
that
in
has
price
taken
low,
has this
it
does
in
the the
from
precau-
all the
England
within
disdain.
the
on
20
last
average,
the
apparent Fise, is not correspond
necessary
the
place
in
now,
stands
for
observe
In
not let their government to them the rate of wages
do
behind
of
extract
following
colleagues
According and
But
wages,
in
fall
rise
cent.,
to
have
they
very
still
50-60
actual
their
illusions.
country,
9s.
the
that
they
however,
in
itself
the
to
this,
of
cradle
disguised,
language
of
spite
now
119
X XV
means
of
meantime.
at
6s.
an
hidden
at
to
all
subsistence
For
accounts
official
years
proof, of
an
the Irish
workhouse.
AVERAGE
Year
WEEKLY
Provisions
ended
and
PER
COST
HEAD
| Clothing
Total
Necessarles
29th
Sept.,
1849
29th
Is.
fore
as
fully
d.
2s.
7%
d.
of
the
necessary
twice,
and
that
price
3d.
ls.
6%
d.
6d.
3s.
1%
d.
Sept.
1869
The
3%
of
means clothing
of
subsistence
exactly
twice,
is there-
as
much
were 20 years before. Even apart from this disproportion, the mere comparison of the rate of wages expressed in gold would give a result far from accurate. Before the famine, the great mass of agricultural wages were paid in kind, only the smallest part in money; to-day, payment in money is the rule. From this it follows that, whatever the amount of the real wage, its money rate must rise. they
on the first source to the French edition
and
of
references
to
it
1872-75.—Ed. |
(sec
pp.
118-22)
are
added
. .
120
KARL
to
‘“Previous
or
rood,
toes.
was
He
buy
the
acre to rear
able
bread,
fowl,
and
fowl,
or
and
they
they
have
tact, of
kind
of
rearguard
they
found
the
have
they
masters
a
then
English
agricultural
the
a
with
potahave to
of
a
feed
sale
or
pig
a
of
pig,
Ireland,
in
King’s
in
an
inspector
pieces
the
the
“The
part
The
as
us
offered
in
first
Queen’s
&c.;
&c.
this
Ulster;
Kilkenny,
centre
the
&c.;
in
in
of
the
Sligo,
Christianti-
this
thereto
from
time
corresponding whom
the
they
In
order
to
labourers,
the
immemorial,
are
.
this
sentiments
proscribed
agricultural
the
country.’’**
has
1.
day,
And of
west,
to
disgrace for
as... a
1n
the
holes
by
the
of
by
a
to
those
in
labourers’
agents,
the
wage-
“The agricultural
“‘are
of
in
these
of
way. tracts
Dublin,
County,
Tyrone,
subject
of
purely
dwellings
this
&c.;
their
act
its
Limerick,
Cork,
Wexford,
Galway, cries out,
treated
of
overcrowded worst that the
certain
of
of
Wicklow,
to
1846
in
farmers surpasses the
exist
being
pp. 29, c., p. 12. c., p. 12.
*l.c.,
the
and
towards
class
worse. A part grows less day
yet
however,
they
labourers
a
which of
with their
of
that
the
themselves
the
of
landlords
dissatisfaction
of
grown
civilisation
sense
the
on
farms
the
part
catastrophe
confiscated.
mere of
the
conditions
counties
belonging
systematically
large
but
most
the
for
connected
exception
attractions
land
of
the
Antrim,
Mayo,
to
and
increase
the have
and
Down,
Roscommon, huts,’
in
were
relations.
labourers the
east,
the
north,
in
and
fraction
which,
with
south, in
Io
can the
labourers
formed
class,
the holdings of hideousness far
generally
1
cabin
a crop they now
But
fowl....
since
a
form
they
on
still whose
and
Only
were
what
dwells huts,
**
keep
his
for
upon which they no benefit from
medium
monetary
by
Since
holds
the
special
labourers
*EX
enjoyed
facilities
agricultural
farmers,
to
begun
know
1846.
the
of
agricultural
minds
and
refuse
employment.
only
We
the
and
consequently
small
wage-labourers,
ty
pig
no
formerly,
smallest
&c.;
his
have
labourer
land,
of
eggs.’’*
In
in
the
famine,
or
half-acre
MARX
are
of
ban,
on
birth
in
the
species given of thus
antagonism led
to
and regard
race.***
revolution
was
to
sweep
CAPITAL,
I, CH.
VOL.
away the huts on the largest from on high. shelter
in
back
neighbouring under
wet,
disease
most
the
and
and
then
people
towns
the
spring,
on are
carried hands
crop
there
is the
These of
most
aggravated
of
the
to
purity
the their
transplanted
****;
idle’
no
in
of
a
into of
and
work, often in sickness,
times
as
“from
the
The
early
of
spring and
to
subject
truth
is
or operations are the year many
out
digging
the
threatened
harvest-time, of
them”*****;
“are
they
“in
what **;
labour
of
or a
scarcity
periods
division”
surplus
agricultural
until
for
a
year
to
rural
divisions”.***
other
October
employment
active
either
perceptible
at
that
the
is still
times
activity;
year
from of
“there
country
the such
the
main
following
further,
broken
days
that and
interruptions’’.******
results
of
arable
into
the
by
the
25. 27.
#*¥
* 1c.,p.
26.
#¥**
Tl,
p.
FREKE
1c.)
pp.
Lc.,
p.
1. 31,32 25.
agricultural
pasture
economy
Le,p.
2K ok kok
worst to the
the
and
suddenly
and
or at
Lo,p.
*
in
according
now obliged to seek work and are only hired by the day, precarious form of wage. Hence
becomes
rigorous
**
like
are
wonder
of
with
to all kinds change
thrown
national
gaiety
only
potatoes
of
during
who
seek
as these are with rare attachment
had to receive surplus-labour
villages,
some
want
this
during
still
and
in
Scarcity
that
and
to
want.’’*
“The towns have deemed to be the
was
.
men
were corners,
they
done
command
sometimes have long distances to go to and from and suffer much hardship, not unfrequently ending
‘they
get
their
farmers
compelled
up
themselves The
were
their
for
for
vice.
of
therefore
in
notable
a
to
families,
eaten
English,
found
hotbeds
cellars
was
This
obedience
There
Irish
of
labour.
of
in
labourers
holes,
hearth,
home-life,
field if
towns.
and
the
are
prejudice, domestic
many
Thus
of
the
as
and
Thousands
testimony
the
scale,
garrets,
slums.
on
situated
villages
into
refuse
121
XXV
model
of
land,
the
labour,
landlords,
revolution—1.e.,
use &c.,
who,
of
the
machinery,
are instead
still of
the
further
spending
K A RL
12 2
rents
their
on
in
their
other
demesnes.
may
demand
attend
many
when
be
and
of
being
or
reaping’’.*
to
Ireland
of
supply
draw
their
rates
at
and
of
ordinary
to
the
tenant
periods
of
sowing
employment,
the
loss
critical
irregularity
to
paid
or
inconvenience
business
in
tenants, who are obliged work, at rates of wages, in
current
the
the
own
and
small
live
law
gentlemen
landlord’s
under to
the
their
the
his
uncertainty
these
do
regard
neglect
that
from
to
considerably without
obliged
The
chiefly
to
condescend
order
broken,
required
instances,
labourers,
In
.
not
“‘labour-supply
to
countries,
M A RX
constant return and long duration of gluts of labour, all these symptoms of a relative surplus-population, figure therefore in the reports of the Poor Law administration, as so
many
hardships
remembered tariat,
a
with
an
England, itself
the
of
we
that
similar
country, the towns, the cities
are
In
the
into
constantly
will that
reserve
industrial whilst
in
reserve
recruits
be
prole-
is
difference
in
recruits
an
Ireland,
agri-
itself
from
of the expelled agricultural supernumeraries of agriculture operatives;
factory
at
the
wages
the
the
It
agricultural
the
the
refuge
towns, whilst in towns, remain sent back to the
into
forced
But
agricultural of
proletariat.
English
districts,
former,
transformed
the
country,
country
cultural
the labourers.
in
spectacle.
industrial the
from
agricultural
met,
in
same
the
time
agricultural
country
the
latter,
those
press
they
labourers,
on are
and
districts
in
search
of
material
condition
of
work. The the
agricultural
to
he
and
wife,
the
upon
this,
After
mous
**
to
it
testimony
through *
the
Leo.,p. Le,
The
pp.
ranks
30. 21, 13.
are
low
fever
is
no
of
the
an
and
to,
has
pulmonary
that,
inspectors, class,
these
of
subjected
that
and
family
means
the
for
own
his
frugality,
ordinary
wonder this
the
follows:
atmosphere
they
of
up
strictest
for
sources
other
privations
susceptible
the
food
children....
other
cularly
with
provide
depends
as
labourer
living
‘Though
sufficient
sum
inspectors
official
clothing
of
cabins, made
sombre they
himself,
combined this
class
his with
parti-
consumption.’’**
according
a
wages are barely pay his rent, and
long
to
the
discontent for
the
unani-
runs return
CAPITAL,
past,
the
of
I, CH.
VOL.
loathe
up
themselves
depopulation, example
an
in
and
I give
was
a
his
and
Friday.
rest).
week;
my
wife
12,
gets
She
along
with
child
of
at
me.
till of
Indian
potatoes, get back
get care
see
a
children
week.
land
one
leads,
school,
for
Peat
At
for
a
week.
A
eat)
girl
going wife
we
we
eight
ourselves;
much
tired
we costs
when
The
we
we
they
as
it
always done
get
once
tea
we
a
get
a
few
done
we
get
are may
a
some-
be.
So
the
same
the
at
night.
We
very seldom. Three of our ld. a week a head. Our rent is 6d. a fortnight at the very
but
pay
whom
goes
work.
winter
milk
I have
house
oat-meal,
the
who
and
and
summer
day,
a
have.
the
get
We
when
little
week
sometimes,
In
girl
we
up to
of
the
and
a
get and
it.
In
past gets day,
home.
get
meal.
we
the
sometimes
to
able
go
am Monday
oldest
come
all
he
was
he
from
servant
the
My
children
That
that
hours of it (for I get 10s. 6d. a
The
all
before
Sunday
firing
work
school.
Indian
very meat
three
and
little
are
get this
of
children;
‘Johnson.—I
and
5s.
say
I
For
cook,
English
evidence
his
at night,
11
morning.
(to
patch
day,
all.
the
mouth.
when
market.
stirabout,
we
flesh
of
attend
a
9d.
bit
the
Sometimes
we go on from day to year round. I am always may
is the
panacea,
to
his
from
till
gets
for
in
our
small
stirabout.
in
also
the
as
it
p.m.,
6
and
get
to
a
planting
to
at
eight.
meal,
water
and
off
is
of
we
times
I took
morning
nothing
at
breakfast
other
sugar
little
have
following
education
Manchester
ready
the
understood
also,
five
with
afford
the
She
ones
takes
at
week;
here
past
We
as be
children
five
house.
half
12
nothing
we
young
the
me
times
the
the
6 in leave
I have works
minds
wakes
and
says
Ireland,”
of
met
to
may
for
from
Saturday
and
North
verbatim,
hand,
goods
meals is
give
future,
operative
factory
“I
workman
evidence
work
the
Baker,
skilled
factory
on
employed
beetler
the
of
Erin.
Green
Insh
to
visit Robert
Irish
skilled
the
life
recent
Inspector,
effort
despair
show:
my
“On
transformed
happy
will
Factory
to
has
a
present,
the
the evil influence of agitators’, idea, to emigrate to America. This into which the great Malthusian
“‘to
only one fixed of Cockaigne, What
123
XXV
1s.
lowest.’’’*
are
Such
In in
the
fact
England.
one
the
of
solution
in
From
total *
misery
At
the
such
Ireland
of
end
is Irish
of
1866
magnates,
Insh
land
The
Times.
‘“‘Wie
life!
is again and
the
Lord
the
topic
beginning set
Dufferin,
menschlich
von
the
of
solch
of
day
1867,
about
its
grossem
”
Herrn! of
wages,
Irish
Table
E
profits,
“Rept.
of
Insp.
we three of
saw
that,
Fact.,
31st
1864,
during
surplus-value Oct.,
makers 1866’,
p.
of
£4,368,610
pocketed 96.
only
124
KARL
£262,819;
same
the
£274,528;
in
£646,377;
in
£736,448;
1865,
1864,
in
total
annual lion’s
magnates yearly
in
national
English
the
as
That
their
depopulation soil,
and,
the
soil.
He
populated,
be
third this of
a
lord,
better,
only,
a
instead
the
getting
The
proof is easily
rid
15
farms
acres.
of
of
supposition
4
has first
the
with
is
also is
benefits
lazily.
the
of
his
onethat school
his
patient until
blood.
the
Lord
one-third
millions;
in
over-
still
too
find
of
millennium
of
at least imagine
of
as
that
accessory
phlebotomy, time
the
swell;
physician
again
as
that,
flows
not
plethora
“disreputable”
rid
did
same two
“excessive’’,
no man
blood-letting
1851
from
three
must
farmers,
and
after
1,228,232 the
to
in
not
is
a
of
without
fact,
Erin
1861
categories,
all
above
persons, that,
a
is he
and
about
of
be
statistical
to
be.
given.
the
These
“supernumerary”
average
as the
new
these,
of
Centralisation
pally
bargain,
at
get Let
men.
often
sickness
demands
must
Ireland
labouring the
land
mere still
the
those
Ireland
emigration
of
phlebotomy
his
that
therefore,
of
of
fact
that
the
the
therefore
people,
of
about
rent-rolls
landlords, the
as
who
one can ever
Irish
up
same as
is
The
facts.
the
the
into
ordered
million
to
stream of
poetic
Dufferin
is, of
happy,
million
lost
profits
the
land
of
wisdom
any way connected course, an idea as
in
declares,
Sangrado,
patient
is
the
But
profit.
number
rents
of
Dufferin
and
therefore,
perfectly
of
Lord
keeps
the
that
the
of
makers,
swallow
to afford
fit
diminishes,
and
Ireland
distribution
benefits
the
To
think
annual
small
so monstrous
is
misery
population
total
and
Scotland
plethora He
the
of
half
surplus-value
inconceivably
in
1864,
in
nearly
1,194
to to
£1,076,912;
£1,320,906;
£2,150,818,
half
rent-rolls
people’s
makers,
makers,
profits.
‘‘unsound’’.
Irish
surplus-value
1865,
the
of
magnates. of
reached
not
does
about
distribution
that
reached
makers
an
rental,
State
materials
or
makers
than
England,
pocketed
surplus-value
in
which
“abstinence”
28
makers,
more share,
of
total
surplus-value
121
profit;
£2,418,833,
the
virtuosi
£4,669,979
of
26
surplus-value
surplus-value
out
however,
three
1864, 1865,
150
1,131
1865,
in
that
profits,
MARX
destroyed
This
reckoning
the
persons.
On
agricultural
| and
under
disappear.
gives
families
the
revolution
princi-
not over 307,058 the low
extravagant is complete
VOL.
I, CH.
NUMBER
AND
CAPITAL,
(1)
Farms
over
not!(2)
acre.
1
125
XXV
EXTENT
over
Farms
over
|not
OF
FARMS
1}
(3)
acres.
5
Acres.|
48,653
25,394
(5)
Farms
30,
not
No.
over
| (6)
over
over
Farms
No.
(8)
acres.
Acres.
No.
Acres.
No.
Acres.
71,961)
2,906,274
54,247|
3,983,880
31,927}
8,227,807}
over
acres,
breeding
are
almost
position
as
before,
small
persons
to
because
quantities.
1,709,532.
total,
eyes
that
is
still
always
over-populated.
all
method *
The
** have
its
total
to
[Note been
lords
things
area
includes
the
by
the
2nd
revolution
Vol.
this
II]
of
w6rk,
in
may
bogs of,
both
the
the
section
depopulation
true
to
on
and by
forcibly
population
landlords,
this
waste
and
most
to thin to the
vient
Ireland, miserable destiny,
profitable
accumulation
famine
legislature,
that
her
world,
the
the
/88,761
and
fulfil
bad the
peat
also
made
and
satisfactory
and
sup-
l’appetit
her
edition. |How
English
proportion
15
cattle-pasture.**
this With
as
discover
miserable,
she
in
drawbacks.
deliberately
and
cultural
good
has
for
same
the
further
Therefore
and
of
Like
over
of
On
And
soon
will
go yet further, that thus an English sheep-walk
must
6
are
there
therefore,
millions, is
5,
remain
known long since in England, cultivation of corn, and for sheep-
Rent-roll’s
she
20,319,924*
there
4,
Categories
vanishing
emigrate;
31/2
absorbable,
Acres.
are, as was
capitalistic
en mangeant, with
again
persons.
100 for
not too
are
these
921,174
emigration
Total
area.
No.
of
3,051,343
136,578]
acres.
100
one-fourth
Acres.
over
Farms
over acres.
not
30
1,836,310)
100
over
Farms
15,
Acres.
(7)
over
not
50,
(4)
over acre s,.
|1 76,368}
1864
IN
not
No.
82,03 7| 288,916
acres.
50
|Acres.
IRELAND
over
Farms
5, 15
No.
IN
I
of
shall
landed
of
rents
in
land. its
the
consequences
individual
carry Ireland show
property.
out
land-
the
down
more There
agri-
to
the
fully
also
in |
126
KARL
Ireland, The
the
accumulation
Irishman,
other
side
the
banished
queen of the young
old
tening,
by
ocean
the
of
giant
in
Marx,
the
Krittk
der
Erster
Band.
and
face
threatening
and
necis.
fraternae
the
of
ers.
Oekonomte.
1867
which
things,
in
his
threa-
posthumous
work,
Nassau
edition
the
of
1965,
Moscow,
the
follows
W.
“Journals,
1,
fourth 1890
of
agricultural
says,
Senior
text
the
edition
Vol.
and
farmers
to
according
Capital,
to the condition of the small present, only one quotation.
At
more
English
German
retum
with
face
*
Printed
Hamburg,
to
agunt
Romanos
fata
Kapital.
politischen
pace. on the
keeps
ox, re-appears
and
book:
Das
America
Fenian,92
rises,
Scelusque
Karl
in
Republic:
Acerba
Published
Irish
sheep
as a
seas
the
the
of
MARX
labour-
with
other
and
Conversations
Essays
to Ireland”, 2 vols. London, 1968; Vol. II., p. 282. “‘ Well,” said “‘we have got our Poor Law and it is a great instrument for giving the victory to the landlords. Another, and a still more powerful instrument is emigration.... No friend to Ireland can wish the war to be prolonged [between the landlords and the small Celtic farmers |—still less, that it should end by the victory of the tenants. The sooner it is over—the sooner Ireland becomes a grazing country, with the comparatively thin population which a grazing country requires, the better for all classes.”’ The English Corn Laws of 1815 secured Ireland the monopoly relating
Dr.
of
G.,
the
free
cially,
importation the
therefore,
Laws
1846,
in
corm
of
cultivation
this
event
circumstances, this impulse to the turning of of
farms,
the
fruitfulness
of
proclaimed
loudly
wheat,
English
that
it
ene
has
takes
*
is
a
the
soil
by
good
for
“‘serious”
Epod
nothing
to
repeat
man,
ala
7.—Ed.
was
arable
into
eviction
had
With
suddenly
alone
herself
but
to
the
Lavergne,
to
for
forage.
other
the
M.
Leonce of
by
Corn
from
the such
all
a great concenAfter
the
1846,
and
cultivation
discover
side
caught
to
1815
from
politicians,
be
Apart
cultivators.
artifi-
the
of
sufficient to give pasture land, to the
destined
produce
on
this
favoured
abolition
removed.
praised
economists,
They
the
small
of
been
Nature
agronomists,
hastened
Horace,
Irish
as
Irish
to
and
Britain.
Great
com.
of
was
monopoly
other
tration
into
of
suddenly de
Laver-
Channel. childishness.
It
Karl
From
Marx
XXXVII
CHAPTER
OF
CAPITAL,
III9 3
VOLUME r
We
rent,
the
ist
mode
of
the
are not manner capitalist
in
Ireland.
tenant
he
pays
to not
the (to
instruments which
he
labour.
would
nor
one.
is
there
is
a part which
his
but
receive
landlord,
the
land,
also
under
usurer
the tion.
does
Irish
to to
compel
continual Tenancy the
his
wave
capital this
“The
Published Karl
Marx,
Krittk
der
Dritter
latter aside
of
in
book:
Friedrich
Bill.
is
his
own core
the
house
Oekonomie.
own own
land would
difference
that
usurer in
the
dispute
Bill
the
off
on
operaover
this
of
tenant
land.94
capital, the
the
of
his
cynical
the
Palmerston
is
land
land,
or
used
to
answer:
landed
of
in
purpose
main
of
his
small
capital
proprietors.”’
Printed
Herausgegeben
Engels
the
improvements
the
a
just
ordering
in
with
the
The
his
for
Kapital.
politischen
Band.
Commons
his is
when
incorporated
House
Das
risk
plunder Rights
demand
the
least
landlord the
indemnify
for
at
with
his
of
normal wage, the same amount of nothing at all for the
expropriates
circumstances,
would
This
the
von
similar
frequently
is,
which the tenant for the most part incorporates through his own labour. This is precisely what a do
What
his
of
for
who
of
case, e.g.,
farmer.
as possessor
a part
also
the
type
the the
that
profit,
existence
rent
of
capital-
without
small
form
is entitled
the
of
the of
he
a
generally
in
otherwise
Besides,
improvement
capitalist,
capitalist
Such
ground-
the
the
industrial
labour),
of
without i.e.,
landlord
merely
surplus-labour
in
itself,
a
being
The
exists
production
of
an
being
in which
property
landed
formally
mode
tenant himself his management
conditions
of
expressing
of
production,
of
absorbs
now
speaking
the
according English
Capital,
Moscow,
Vol.
1966
to
edition III,
the of
text
Karl
THE
FENIAN
a at
held
evening
special
meeting
office
following
Men’s
“The
memorial the
“That
at
of
England
the
four
same
the
But
even
evidence
Wednesday
adopted: the
of
Council
International her
Gathorne-Hardy,
the
of
execution
Majesty’s
which,
stamp if
it
the
the
of
a
the
Government
itself,
between
blood-handed
the
magnanimous public.9 ©
humanity
act,
the
of
not
had
latter
but
Manchester tainted
would
now
the
young
and
old
of
the
have
been
erroneous,
will
revenge.
political
of
of
Execution
Maguire,
other
to
influence
evidence
been
practices of
of
the
condemned moral
The
same
pardon
false,
judicial
verdict
upon
the
Continent.
free
one
the
not
rests
by
prisoners
the
working
showeth:
impair
upon
resting
declared,
Irish
greatly
European
representing
Europe,
of
the
of
will
the
prisoners
undersigned,
all parts
in
upon
verdict
bear
Hon.
Manchester
officially
on
W.,
I.W.A.
State.
associations
death
was
General
Right
of
East,
Street,
the
of
Council
5
Association.
the
“To
Secretary
Castle
THE
ASSOCIATION?
General
memorial
the
of
“Memorial
men’s
16,
the
MEN’S
the
of
AND
MANCHESTER
WORKING
the
Working
AT
PRISONERS
INTERNATIONAL
At
Marx
jury
and
the
by
the
British
have
to
choose
Europe
and
Transatlantic
the Re-
FENIAN
AT
PRISONERS
“The will be an
commutation act not only order
‘By
of
129
MANCHESTER
the
the sentence for which we of justice, but of political wisdom. General
of
Council
the
“JOHN R.
EUGENE
KARL HERMANN P.
SHAW,
MARX, JUNG,
Published
francais November
in
No.
Le
for for
Secretary
America
France
for
Secretary
Germany
Switzerland
for
Secretary
for
Secretary
Spain
Poland
Secretary
for
Holland
Secretary
for
Belgium
ECCARIUS,
General
Secretary.”
1867
courrier
163, 24,
Chairman for
Secretary
LAFARGUE,
BESSON,
20,
Association,
Secretary
DERKINDEREN, G.
I.W.
WESTON,
DUPONT,
ZABICKI,
November
pray
of
1867
Printed
according
of
the
book
of
the
First
1866-1868.
The
to
the
General
text Council
International. Minutes,
Moscow
Karl
[NOTES
Marx
AN UNDELIVERED ON IRELAND] 97
FOR
I. EXORDIUM.
our
Since
nianism, blood
at
last
has by
Ireland
and
England.
responsible.
to
a
tical,
but
upon
Europe
the
Act
to
right
up
keep
quite
of the
Long
the
Insh
as
Act.99 mental Case of
State of siege. organisation of
the
an
on
Bntish
outlaw.
Bonaparte.!
is
discussion,
been
baptised
Political
fate
of
John
in
the
hypocrisy
that The
affair.
at
Brown
Har-
between
and
liberal
this
was
press
their
soil, in
Government
the
of
Suspension
Facts from the “Assassination
to
keep
a
divine
every
Irish
[have] but
poli-
produced
anxious
English
native
no
effect
seem
They
England Habeas
to
have
at
least
text
is
Chronicle. Govemand Violence’’.!
QUESTION
treated
crossed
out
John
Brown
in
be
Corpus
9!
following
°
in
Executions
struggle
Parliament
Fe-
Fenianism?
the
Ed.
has
The
contrary.
Il. THE
felon.”
It
Parliament.98
treated
slaveholders
our
of
period
whole the
the
against
Here
the
of
criminal
fighting
*
phase.
anew
The
common
fight
What
object
Gladstone.
Reason:
up
us
open
They
EXECUTION
Government.
remind
Ferry.*
the
a new
English
Manchester
pers
meeting
entered
the
THE
SPEECH
the
as a
manuscript: rebel,
not
“But
the
as common
NOTES
AN
FOR
UNDELIVERED
SPEECH
Ill. THE
LAND
Decrease
ON
IRELAND
13]
QUESTION Population
of
1846 1841:
8,222,664
1866:
5,571,971
in
2,650,693
2,650,695
1855:
6,604,665
1866:
5,571,971
25
1801:
Jahren*
years
11
|in
5,319,867
$1,032,694
1,032,694
not
Population the
deaf-mutes,
increased
of Live-Stock
In
same
decrepit,
numbers
period
to
1855
the
the
lunatic,
the
of
1855
from
but
number
of
and
the
idiotic
population.
1866
to
1866
[the ] number of the live-stock increased as follows: cattle by 178,532, sheep by 667,675, pigs by 315,918. If we take into account the simultaneous decrease of horses by 20,656, and equalise 8 sheep to 1 horse total increase of live-stock: 996,877, about
one
the
decreased, the
to the
relatively
Increase
only
blind,
from
million.
1,032,694
Thus
one
million The
them?
Inshmen
cattle,
pigs,
emigration
list
have
and
been
sheep.
displaced
What
has
by
about
become
of
answers.
Emigration From Character
Ist of
that
or
to
31
been
brought
enlarging
scale
consolidation of farms (eviction) conversion of tillage into pasture. by
1866:
December
1,730,189.
emigration.
process has upon an always The
ing
1851
May
about by
and the
and
by
is still
function-
throwing
together
the
simultaneous
From 1851-1861 |the| total number of farms 120,000, while simultaneously the number of *
Years.—Ed.
decreased farms
of
132
KARL
acres
15-30
increased
(together
170,000).
to
owed than
the
amongst
the
portion How
of
the
a)
is
not
have
means Leshe, m says: a
loss
island,
the
go
further
the
food
b)
than
470,917,
cereal
potatoes
the
of of
exact
has
an
London
did
and,
the
partly
partly, in
farmer
the
land
the
profit *
See
less
that larger
a
than
off
under
acre
exodus,
the
the
him.
for of pp.
the
Rents soil
123-24.-Fd.
every
of
this
land
16.3,
rise
in
shilling in
since has
crop. 1847 47.9,
a greater
most
does
his
not
ordinary
There
to
crops: acres
has
been
1865
per 36.1,
turnips
decrease,
but
1847. been
underfed
consolidation
and
of
overfarms,
corn-acre to
profits
decreases.
green
128,061,
flax
show
injudicious
and
9,
ago.”’
greater
but
oats
decrease:
Professor
throughout
a
1861-66:
wheat,
the
February
day;
years
10
200%;
crops.
because, under the great measure trusted
a
to
Owing
was
he
years, a
the
potato
the
dated
Is.
1846.
of before
100%.
by
21
in
only
as
nearly
Decrease
in
from
risen
population
wages is now 21 years ago.
deteriorated, that
since
Economist
potatoes 50%. Some years would on the whole it has been gradual worked,
to
only is
has
to great
average
acres
yeld
of
on
life
per statute
Decrease
Since
means
similar
20%,
crops:
in
the
people
than
worse
is
1861-66:
cent;
the
crisis
more
the
6d.
of
a
as
of
rate
Decrease
decrease
farms
now
The Land. Decrease of land
2)
one
there
of
population
of
of 2/5
labourer
to
risen
price
necessary
“After
mass
verging
surplus
The
the
exclusively
than
dimension.
the
of
state
Wages
of
almost
Works
situation
The relative famine.
Cliffe 1867,
was
109,000
by
People.
their
famine.
number
large
of
Process
The and
acres
30
of
decrease
decreased
farms
The
The
that
extinction of farms from less Lord Dufferin.* The increase
acres.
15
61,000,
by
MARX
his
may The
system,!%* the labourers to manure increase, total
although
produce
may
N O T ES
FO R
V ERED UND ELI
AN
diminish,
but
produce,
falling
the
labourer.
rioration
the
price
gradual
and
and
exhaustion
the
of
of
is
converted
greater
expulsion
into
the
produce
natives,
source
surplus
instead
farmers,
surplus
of
the
133
I RELA N D
it, which
of
to landlord
And
result:
So
part
that
ON
S PEE C H
to
has
risen.
gradual
dete-
national
of
of
the
life,
soil. Process
of
process
This strides.
The
has
only
begun;
consolidation
one
under
7
Consolidation
to
has
It
is
will
be
The farms of
to
569,844
and
Of
cleared
their
In
price
acres,
=8,227,807,
2/5
bogs and
form
in
under 1864:
waste
land:
this
and
,=12,092,117 100
under
if all farms
was
acres, are in
farms
of
having
still
form
the
hands
100
from
till
and are in the hands of 31,927 persons. Thus 2,847,220, if we number only the farmers
English
[is
offspring
abolition
Character
district, from of
minus
England the
English
its by
of
the
in
policy:
the
Highlands
displacing
the
heads!95
of Irish
it
transforming
resident
a
broad
Rule
the
lords
water
English
in
and
an
their
ditch.
in Ireland
Scotland.19*) by
of
and
systematic.
only tool of the landlords. Eviction, also of political punishment. (Lord Abercorn.*
State
as means
famine
corn-laws,!93
of
meat and wool, now the estate of Ireland,
separated of
natural
the
of
agricultural
retainers,
a]
by
of
Clearing
Gaels:
including 3/5
farms
from
families.
the
Change
those
rapid
off
This system 1846, accelerated rise
Ireland,
to
1
farmers;
acres,
500 be
of
under
from
over
area acres.
total
in
the
far
reached the English point of consolidation, 100 acres have disappeared. Now the state 20,319,924
on
going
attacked
first
acres.
15
under
it
employed England.
Former (Elizabeth),
English round-
(Cromwell). Since Anne 18th-century politicocharacter only again in the protectionist measures of England against her own Irish colony; within that colony making religion a proprietary title. After the Union! °® [the} system of rack-renting and middlemen, but left the Insh, however ground to the dust, holder of their native soil. economical
*
See
pp.
153-54.—Ed.
134
KARL
system,
Present
ment
only
From 1)
quiet
business-like
instrument
this
extinction,
landlords
of
(and
MARX
govem-
and
usurers).
state:
altered
Distinguishing
character
of Fenianism:
lower-
Socialist,
movement.
class 2)
Not
Priests leader,
Ridiculous
pniests
against No
Character
4)
of
5)
ership 6)
remained
Popishism
leader
the
of
and
the
of
English.
move-
Irish
High
their
Catholic
representatwe
leader
of
O’Connell’s
physical
party
Parliament.
Insh
in
Influence
in
the
British
force
movement.!97
Ex-
movement,
and
action,
lead-
European
of
Parliament.
phraseology. Amenica,
Ireland,
Republican,
because
now
the
given
IV.
THE
of
Aristocracy
b)
Irish
and
of
the
and
Chastity of Irishmen. Diminution of crimes.
1866
for
......588.
above
Army.
Irish.
Attempts
..........
Committed
but
in
at
etc.
The
education
Convicted:
17,678 4,326
10,454 2,418
specific
Algiers.)
Lowering
Irish
Ireland
trial:
a
all
(France,
on wages,
and
Convicted
1852
and
Influence
English
Fenianism.
of
PEOPLE
right,
Church
in England.
republic.
ENGLISH
of humanity question.
a)
America
characteristics
cause
character
fields
England—three
America.
of
I have
A English
Emancipation
Catholic
Fenianism.
Nationality.
English
as
long
O’Connell,
ment.
tinction
as
leaders
Daniel
3)
movement.
Catholic
the
Character.
in
Ireland.
NO T ES
FO R
The trial
decrease
in
short
for
for
Progress
1855,
is
committed partly
authorising
with trial
to
of
the
the
to
Justices
consent
the
the
of
to
due
for the
pass
prisoners,
sessions.
English
people.
Infamy
of
press.
English c)
periods
committing
of
1855,
of
persons
of
since
13 5
I R ELA ND
ON
numbers
Wales,
Act
Birmingham. the
the
and
Justice
sentences instead
in
England
Criminal
S PEE C H
UND EL I V ERED
AN
The
Foreign
Policy.
etc.
Poland,
Palmer-
Castlereagh.
ston.108
V.
Foolishness
Error
the
of
as
Repeal
of
the
minor
of
REMEDY
parliamentary
League.!
Reform
one
THE
the
propositions.
99
articles
of
the
English
Democratic
Party.
Published
in:
Collected
Works,
Russian Moscow,
ed.,
Marx
Vol.
1960
and
Engels,
Printed
second
of
the
16,
Council
to
according book of
1866-1868.
The the
the
text
General
First
Minutes,
International. Moscow
Karl
[OUTLINE
THE
TO
A
OF
Marx
REPORT
EDUCATIONAL
OF
WORKERS
is
the
from
But
in
GERMAN
That
16,
the
in
characterises
the
priests
King
mass
only
of
the
during
the
England,
m
bourgeois also
rising
1798.
Fenjanism,
attitude
against
it
the all
it
chiefs
and
James
of
the
I, Pro-
Lord Fitzthis century clergy,
Catholic
movements
earlier
a
decreed
not lift until all influence
did
deprive
by in
clergy
Catholic
and
III;
(Wolfe Tone, and, finally, in
role
men,
even
Wilham
orders.
movements
Anglo-Irish
supported
leading
really
lower
Irnsh
Cromwell;
leaders.
still
middle-class
against
of Ulster revolution
The
which
would
or
is
the
earlier
originates
and
(and
people, all
it
initiators
root
The
war
the
a
the
aristocracy
O’Connell
played
excepting
In
churchmen.
Republicans gerald)!!! in the 1798
which
the
it.
Catholic
testant the
are
of
the
LONDON
Actually,
took
followed
ASSOCIATION
IN
Fenianism?
movement
the
QUESTION
1867119]
They
what
people
always
of
Americans.
Ireland
is
the
distinctive
Irish
rooted)
IRISH
COMMUNIST
December
What
THE
ON
ban
on its
it
realised
that
on
the
Irish
masses.
find
the
present
II
Here regime
why
So
the
this
to
1846,
leaving
no
England
who
secession,
though
less
English:
they
England’s
What side do but
life-and-death
I want with
not in
and
to
the
Ireland’s struggle.
irreconcilable
show—and
Irish,
see—is form,
oppression
former
determined
barbarian
alternative
or
with
most
now?
Englishmen right
the
baffles
compared
opposition
those
by
what
mild
Ireland. of
is
is
who
that
the
in
effect
voluntary
what
of form
even
concede
them
regime
since
destructive,
emancipation
OUTLINE
OF
REPORT
ON
IRISH
137
QUESTION
Ii!
past
Concerning
history the
Hence,
a
out
now
called
The
the
present
the
Irish
English
about
are
facts
give
points
few
the
I shall
between
difference
bring
a)
book.
history
a
only
few,
to
clarify
secondly,
those
of
who
to
are
r
people.
in Ireland
and,
character
any
in
firstly,
past
and
the
available
the
Before
Protestant
Reformation
1172.
Henry
conquest.
nominal
man.
1576),
English
A
Anglo-Norman
was
conquest
Indians.
nobles
No
with
Inish
IV,
the
English-
(in
Elizabethan
colonists
(originally) sent
reinforcements
It
from
to
with
Irish,
and
the
war
Otherwise,
as
the
Capital:
Pale’’.113
chiefs.
was a
Ireland.
present
the
“English
conducted
English
Pope
back
common
English
of
of
Adrian
another took
The
%
than
Pope
later XIII,
Gregory
Mixing
less
from
(Elizabeth).!!2
Dublin. of
gift
years
400
Some
times,
of
II conquered
against
Ireland
Red 1565
until
(Elizabeth).
b)
Protestant Epoch. Elizabeth. James I. Charles I. Cromwell. Colonisation Plan (16th and 17th Centuries) Elizabeth.
up
to
the
The
river
colonists
in
Shannon,
their
still
Catholic
The
avowed
plan
Clearing
the
loyal
ing
place,
Anglo-Irish of
ceded
estates
Not
until
the
the
English
natives,
at
Irish settle
least
English
Elizabeth
alongside
and
the
natives.
stocking
only to plant “adventurers”
succeeded
Protestant
Jrish of
English
(Jacobite stock
the
are
7613
were
they The
Persecution
to take their land and etc. In battles against
of
native
Ulster. “‘to
mies”.
the
English:
They
with
I.
previously
the
English
undertakers,
Irish’’.
exterminate
a
it
with
landown-
(merchants,
obtained from the English crown the confiscat‘“‘gentlemen undertakers” who were to plant the
who and
James
to
fought
island
Englishmen.
aristocracy.
usurers), ed lands,
was
plan
plantation,
Irish
looked
considered
upon
as
1609-12.) stolen
confiscated,
Parliament!14
Catholics.
families.
English
“outlaws”
governed
only
British
lands
with
subjects; and
“ene-
the
Pale.
138
KARL
Elizabeth and
settled
James
yet
been
I,
Ulster,
purged.
but
Leinster
to
I tried
Charles
Connaught.
First
Cromwell.
plete
national
Partial
Conquest.
Irish in
not
have
Connaught
purge
Munster,
MARX
Revolution
Dublin.
revolt
Ireland,
of
Re-colonisation.
1641.
of
(Followed
by
2nd
Com-
(1641-60. )
1649
August
Ireton,
its
landing
Cromwell
Lambert,
Fleetwood,
Henry
Cromwell. )
In 1652 Division
ed.
ers’’
the 2nd Complete Conquest of lreland completof spoils: the Government itself, the “‘adventur-
who
had and
officers
12
lent
£360,000
soldiers,
August,
Amalekites
by
1652,
and
the
Irish
of
re-devastated
land
many
of
into
slavery
and
English thigh,
colonies
the
Thence
the
Restoration
Second
Irish
West
of
Irish
mistrust
to
other
the
Revolt,
Stuarts. and
the
the
replant
the
Puritan entire
of
regions,
sale
of
Indies.
the
English
William
HI.
of
and
Smite
brand-new
of
the
Parliament,
depopulation
inhabitants
in
war,
of
1653.115
By engaging in the conquest of Ireland, English Republic out the window.
the
c)
hip
new
their
the
of
devastation,
removal
Irish
Acts
September,
Nation
with
English.—_Bloodshed, counties,
the
26
years
11
the
for
party.
people’s
on
Capitulation
threw
Cromwell
Terms116
1660-1692. * The
any of
British
were
more
then
other time. Never higher the Irish population.
1684. Ireland,
1685.
repealed
some
calls
1689.
landed
at
capitulates *
gives
and
that
Acts
proprietors
to
III
at
the
head
William
HI,
1691.
by
‘‘(1701)
of
Ireland lower
Catholic
The
than
7/11
interest
soon
Catholics
Settlement
of
Ireland.
of
Catholics
at
than
must
re-established.
be James
England.
Kinsale
Followed
the
1641
of
William
to
in
the
favoured.
the
regiments
to
rein
full
increased the
Irish
army.
IT
declare and
Catholic
a
army to
favour
enlist
James
Catholic
began
to
and
to
II begins
Charles
than
numerous in 3/11, never
12
England.
(Anne)”
March,
Irish
of
Shameful in
the
1689:
soldiers. violation
manuscript.—Ea.
James
Limenck of
the
OUTLINE
OF
treaty, d)
REPORT
already
Ireland
under
4,
All
notions
German
and
tants
the
in
ists)
William and
III,
more
still
to
Humbled
under
the
Anne.
Dust.
and
Protestants (woollen
the
attempted.
Parliament
command
on
tax
prohibitory
Irish
English
and
Settling
French
Protes-
the
English
obedient
colon-
flee
system.
mercantile
on
with
discarded.
manufacturers)
Anglo-Irish
passed,
were
tenant
towns The
country
“planting” the farmers
of
or French
protectionist
1698.
139
QUESTION
1776
yeomen
Scotch
IRISH
Defrauded
1692-July
a)
ON
(like the
of
woollen
country, a to foreign
mother
export
goods
countries.
1698.
In
on
tax
heavy England
and
other
same
the the
Jreland,
upon
and
English
the
of
absolutely struck
She
depopulated
the
the
import
Wales,
countries.
year,
her
home
cities
the
and
legislation Molyneux
against for the
1698:
Parliament
struggle
between
William
III
to
the
of
people
back
the
Ireland the
resisted
the
the
Anglo-Insh the
of
Colony in Ireland) against struggle of the English English Nation. Simultaneously,
the
to
and
Colony
shameful
Parliaments
Irish Cattle. independence
Cry
English
began
and
absentees.117
the
attempts
of
the
treaties
violate
Irish
the
Nation.
English
and
Limerick
of
Galway.
B) with
Penal Code!!9 assent of the
make
a
(1701-13;
of
Catholic
Protestant
to
Catholics
to
was
be
a
Catholicism
by
the
code
a
Most
for
(Education. private
transportable
an act
of
1776).
Anglo-Irish
amongst
Protestants,
title.
able
religion
to
A
“Property”.
until
George
Parliament.
Proselytes
proprietary
Catholic
up
built English
Protestant
from
erty”? ism”
Anne.
Queen
regulations
(No
pamphlet
Thus
in
Anglo-Inmsh
of England
(i.e.,
English.!1!8
Colony
to
export
their
land.
Similar
and
in
manufactures
threw
lords) 1692.
the
a
laid
manufactures
prohibited
down
The Wailliamite (imported against absentee landlords since
Irish
Parliament
the
Parliament
Irish
Catholics
the
transfer
or to
make
soldier.) To
“Prop-
disabilities.) To
felony,
of
by
“Anglican-
Personal
treason.
means
infamous
teach
to be
the
convert
a
Catholic
a
140
KARL
Archbishop—banishment, of
treason;
high
returning
if
hanged,
banishment—act
from
disembowelled
MARX
alive,
and
afterwards
quartered. the
Anglican
coerce
to
Experiment
religion.
mass
the
poor
people
During the e)
the in
Catholics
1776-1801. a)
the
palmy
English
English
of
into
for
members
the
Catholic
indolence.
of
Protestant
Protestants
ascendancy
and
encroach
upon
not
did
Transition
of
dealing
of
of
hold
nation
numbers.
Time
Before
result
the
the
habits
days
degradation,
Catholic
into
fell
Irish
of vote
deprived
Catholics
of Parliament.' 2° This Penal Code intensified Priesthood upon the Irish people. The
the
of
with
this
transition
penod,
was
what
terrorism?
incomers
absorbed
into
the
Irish
people
and
Cathohcised.
The
towns
No
English
by
founded
colony
the
English
(except
Insh.
Ulster
Scotch)
but
English
landowners.
The point 8B)
to
North
in Irish
1777
the
Amencan
the
to
army
British
American
concessions
Revolution
the
forms
first
turning-
Saratoga
Spnngs
history. surrendered Brittsh
“rebels”.
the
Nationalist
at
cabinet
party
(English)
to
forced
make
in Ireland.
1778. Roman Catholic Relief Bill (passed by the AngloIrish Parliament). (Catholics were still excluded from acquiring by purchase, or as tenants, any freeholds!2! interest. ) 1779. Free Trade with Great Britain. Almost all restraints put upon Irish industry swept away. 1782.
The
simple,
1783. Winter nexed another
portion
become
Colonels
ment,
étc.
nights
1792-93.
Belgium
acquire
open
and—to Equal
in
property
freehold
the
After
Anglo-Irish the
England the
released.
further
The for
Roman
or
life,
in
schools. of
and of
still
Code
to
allowed
Catholics
fee
Penal
Penal
Army,
French resolved Code
elective
was
Parliament. had
Government
upon
French
released.
franchise
for
Irish Irish
anwar,
could Parlia-
OF
O U T LI NE
Rebellion Lord
Irish
Anglo-Irish passed
of Britain Insh and
illegal
1800.
in
and Ireland the English.
Act
Republicans
Belfast
peasants
House
14 1
Q UES T I ON
I RI SH
1798.
of
Fitzgerald).
Union
ON
R E P O RT
of
By
not
ripe. voted
Commons
the
Tone,
(Wolfe
Legislature
the
for
and
Act
Union
Customs
closed the struggle between The colony itself protested
of
the Angloagainst the
Union.
of
c
1801-1846
a) 1801-1831. At this time (after the end of the war! 22) movement for emancipation of Catholics under way among
a
Irish
and
English
From
1783
which
after
legislative
duties her
of
independence
on
imposed with
to
people
the
employ
Ireland,
of
various
articles
intention
some
of
that
Irish
shortly
of foreign enabling
of
their
surplus
etc.
labour,
The
es
were
avowedly
manufacture,
some
(1829).
consequence as
natural
gradually
disappeared
was the
Act
of
manufactur-
came
Union
into
effect.
Dublin
Master
woollen
Hands
employed
manufacturers
Master
.......++.-. woolcombers ---+-.++-
Hands
employed...........
Carpet
Hands
manufacturers
weavers
Kilkenny
Hands
ee
.1800
..
eee
employed.-.-...++.++--s
Silk-loom
Blanket
oe
.
at
work
...........
manufacturers.......
employed
Balbriggan Calico-looms
at
work
........
91
1840
”
4,918
”
30
1834
5
”
230
1834
66
”
13
”
720
”
2,500
1840
250
56
1822
42
1800
”
3,000
”
12
602
1841
]
”
0
”
1799
2,500
184]
1800
1,000
184]
925
226
Wicklow Handlooms
atwork
-+.++4+8-+
0
K A RL
142
MA RX
Cork
weavers
Braid
Worsted
weavers
HosterS
«2c
Woolcombers Cottonweavers
etc.
The
has
been
”
90
wwe nccee cence
”
300
”
28
.....ceceeee ese ree «1+.
”
700
”
110
”
2,000
”
220
industry
the
flannel
Kilkenny,
of of
That
business—which
fortunate
which
been
ratteen
destroyed.
of
and
Union
that favoured, and privileged, and patronised maker’s’’ (Speech of T. F. Meagher, 1847. )
was
has
been
operatives, the
Bandon,
frieze
Act
14,000
have
1,491
blanket
the
alone
not
business
is
of
survives!
struck
the
.
worsted
manufactures
business
One
the
looms
Rathdrum,
of
trade
this.
for
employed
silk
employed
camlet the
Waterford,
have
which
3,400
manufacture
the
Carrick-on-Suir
compensate
Dublin, the
manufacture,
destroyed;
not
did
of
destroyed;
serge
manufactures
(Ulster)
manufacture
been
the
manufacture
40
2,000
has
destroyed;
1834
”
cotton
Operatives,
1,000
---..+-++.4-.
linen
“The
1800
......5+506-
down—
Irish
coffin-
Every time Ireland was about to develop industrially, she crushed and reconverted into a purely agricultural land. After the latest General Census of 18617: Agricultural
(including labourers
In
in
of
cottiers!23
with
their
small
Ireland
and
families) (of which
towns
798 fact
the
were
Population
all
market
farm 4,286,019
many 1,512,948
towns)
5,798,967
(1861)
Therefore
approximately
4/5
purely
agricultural,
towns are also counted. Ireland is therefore purely agricultural: ‘‘Land is life’’ (Justice Blackburne). Land became the great object of pur-
and
actually
suit. the
The
perhaps
people
occupation
6/7
now
had land,
of
market
if
at
before
them
any
rent,
or
thus
enabled
the
choice
starvation.
between System
of
rack-renting. ‘The and
lord
the has
land been
five
and
times
water.”
as
was
we have heard per acre. Enormous
that
much as £10 of an enormous extent, let by rapacious monopolising landjobbers, to be relet by
8,
even
of
it
therefore
their
value,
among
the
wretched
and
to of
dictate the
rents,
low
indolent
terms,
of
wages,
£5,
on
potatoes
6,
farms
proprietors
oppressors,
intermediaté
starvers
own
his
payment
to for and
OUTLINE
OF
IRISH
143
QUESTION
starvation.
in England create a monopoly to a certain export of Irish com to England. The average grain in the first 3 years following the passage of Union about 300,000 qrs,
Laws
Corn
extent
for
export
of of
Act 1820 1834
ON
popular
of
State
the
REPORT
the
over
qrs, average of 2/2 million qrs, Amount to pay rent to absentees, and gages (1834), over 30 million dollars (or 1 million
yearly
to
interest
7 million
mort-
pounds
sterling). Middlemen accumulated fortunes that they would not invest in the improvement of land, and could not, under the system which prostrated manufactures, invest in machinery, etc. All their accumulations were sent therefore to England the
investment.
for
British
securities Irish
of
in
to
England,
in
trade
free
pounds
sterling,
cheap works
England
labour
and
and
of
Britain”’.
Many
pigs
to In
the
of
by
British
investment the
as many
to
to
the
following
Ireland
adop-
millions
to
forced
of
contribute
up
building
of
great
“‘the
same.
of
Accretion
years same
more The
was
transfers
1.e.,
amounted
published
Ireland’s
of
population
from
8,175,238
10
In
the
years
13
the
capital
export
and
1831-1841. 7,767,401
thus
cheap
that
Ireland,
1821,
in
document
official
shows
Government
from
capital
tion
An
with
O’Connell. Whigs.!24#
Acts,
Coercion
period
being...
..............
ee
there
per
year)
2...
2.
40,000
than
total
cee
2...
ee
te
ee ee
te
emigrated
cee
Repeal Movement. Partial famines.
ee
ene
407,837
(somewhat
ee
eee
ee
450,873
ee
858,710
Lichfield-House Contract Insurrection Acts, Arms
Acts. IV
The
Period
the
of
Clearing
Earlier, general. This
(1846-47),
repeated
new
period
starvation
of
cases was and
Last
20
Years
the
Estate
of
partial
ushered
the
(from
1846).
Ireland
of
Now
famine.
in
consequent
by
famine
potato exodus. the
was
blight
144
KARL
one
million
die,
partly
etc..
(caused
by
hunger).
Over
diseases, 1,656,044
The
revolution
a
but
natural
(Families small
the
of
result
clubbed
most
and
In
partly
years,
nine
from
1847-55,
country.
the
left
hunger,
from
MARX
old
the
of
barren
to
together
enterprising.)
leaseholds
send
Hence,
and
of
substitution
People fled. youngest
fields.
away course,
the the
pooling
pasturage
of
was
system
agricultural
of
crop
for
farming.
a
However, soon circumstances conscious and deliberate system. Firstly,
one
the
of
result, in
be
and
of
Now,
the
In
products
was
English
now,
market
as
horned
by
the
could
meat, in the
of
wool
connected
and
market
steadily the
of
Act
industry
with cattle.
the
old
Deprived
Union
of
a
As
Rents price
increased
partly
sheep
chiefly
English
the
was
disaster.
dropped.
growth
became
Laws
Corn
the
meantime,
Tremendous
this
Irish
on
prices
the
Pig-raising
the
of
Corn
the
of
monopoly
aminal
years.
England.
system.
paid.
other 20
its
years.
ordmary
preceding in
lost
whereby
Repeal
factor:
consequences
corn
longer
wool
chief
direct
Irish
the
no
the
arose
her
of
own. circumstances
Contributing
Reorganisation
Secondly:
of
Caricature
Thirdly:
same The
this
systematic:
agriculture
of
hovels,
flight
of
starving
workhouses
ter, Birmingham, Glasgow state almost of starvation. Act
made
in
England.
in Ireland. despairing
basements,
filled
that
in
men,
with
Irish
to
Liverpool,
women,
England Manches-
children
in
a
Parliament passed (1847-48) that Irish landlords had to support their own paupers. (The English Pauper Law is extended to Ireland.) Hence, the Irish (especially English) landlords, mostly deep in debt, try to get nd of the people and clear their estates. of
Fourthly: “The
landlord
at the same maintenance
mortgages
pay
no
Encumbered was
time
of
and imterest;
ruined,
hable
his
poor now a
he
for
Act
could
the
created law
was
when
(1853°?.) no
collect
payment neighbours. His
for
settlements, and
Estates
land food
passed,
rents,
and
he
was
enormous
of
by
was was aid
taxes for the encumbered with
high, of
and
which
he
could
property
OUTLINE
could
OF
be
REPORT
ON
summarily
among
distributed
IRISH
disposed
those
who
145
QUESTION
of
had
a
at legal
public
sale,
upon
claims
and
the
proceeds
it.”
Absentee Proprietors. (English capitalists, insurance societies, etc., thereby multiplied, equally former middlemen, etc., who wanted to run their farms on moder economic lines. Eviction of farmers partly by friendly agreement
tenure.
terminating ly
by
But
crowbar
brigades,
forcible
ejection.
roofs),
more
much
beginning (Also
masse
evictton*en with
as
used
the
(forcib-
destruction
political
of
retribution. )
has continued since 1847 to this day. (Abercorn, Viceroy of Ireland.) African razzias (razzias of the little African kings). (People driven from the land. The starving population of the towns largely increased. ) This
are
tenantry agents direct
‘The
Land police
and
brigade’ houses....
Paper,
soldiery.
sun
The
1852.)
us
Let Ireland,
(Abercorn.
*)
now
how
see
where
work
protection
devoted
rose
that
The
the
the
cottages
the
of
operation.
Under
to
advances
out
tumed
the
the
of
scores at a time.... a large force of
by
done
by
latter,
township, takes village sets on
on a
system
this
are
quite
Cultivated
Land.
conditions
is
the
‘crowbar
possession
a
(Galway
the
affected different
the
of
desert.”
from
land
in
those
in
England. Decrease
of
1861-66
Decrease
in
cereal
crops
1861-65
428,041
acres
107,984
acres
42,876
acres
20,077
acres
1866
Decrease
green
in
crops
Total 470,917
decrease
Decrease
of
per
1547-1865
47.9,
turnips
greater
Yield
per
cent:
36.1,
decrease,
128,061
See
pp.
the
potatoes
but
1847,
*
Statute
153-54.—Ed.
on
the
Acre
exact
50. whole
of Every
decrease:
oats,
years
Some
it
Crop
has
been
16.3,
would gradual
flax
show since
a
146
KARL
MARX
~
ESTIMATED
AVERAGE
PER
STATUTE
Wheat
PRODUCE
ACRE
Potatoes
Flax
tons
stones
cwts
(14
1851
12.5
5.1
38.6
1866
11.3
2.9
24.9
Though wheat
in
Ireland
exported
past,
the
oats
ing
Ibs.)
(the
it
now
is
yield
considerable
to be
said
per
which
of
good
acre
quantities only
cultivat-
for
also
of
continuously
decreases). In
1866
fact:
wheat
48,589
against
fold).
Meanwhile,
qrs
oats
of
the
worked,
and
partly
decreases.
produce
risen.
of
1801: 1861:
show,
1871,
total
consolidation
to
his
although
the
may
diminish, produce,
sterilisation (gradual) of the Romans (ditto in Egypt. )
land,
as
speak
of
the
livestock,
but
and
still
to surplus
falling
the in
about
first
the
of
by
Sicily
popu-
the
Population
5,319,867; in
And
farmer.
farms,
produce
surplus
produce into
of
system,!4*5 the to manure the farmer is no
(where
profits
over-
labourers
of
1841: If
1871,
however,
even
and
converted
5,764,543.
5,300,000
million
and
underfed
corn-acre
the
trusted
increase,
(great)
been
price
the
of
four-
one
the
shall
Decrease
may
has
injudicious
under
Rents
it be
and
has
We lation.
the
The
of
Hence, ancient
land
measure
greater part the landlord
the
the
because,
the land for him. peasant farmer) soil
shipped shipped out approximately
from
a great
in
qrs
exodus,
partly
farmer
it
qrs
out only 13,250 in (that is, almost
shipped
£1,201,737).
(for
Since
Ireland
though
the that
that the
the
8,222,664; trend
is,
less
continues, than
population
emigration
1851:
rate
6,515,794;
there
in
1801.
will
be
remains
will
I shall
lower
be
now
still
constant.
in
OUTLINE
OF
REPORT
ON
IRISH
147
QUESTION
Emigration
accounts
Emigration 1845-66
ly
2,000,000
Irish.
emigration
was
4,657,588).
equalled and
1847
after
However,
the
about
Natural
accretion
same
the
9,074,514
for.
the the
decade,
accretion.
account
died
growth is
in
the
for
population
the
decreased
increased
have
been
6,515,794.
only
this
of
figure,
1,284,507
leaves
the
or
cent,
whole
deficit
evidently,
of
natural
1841-51.
decade
1851-61.
of
to
6,515,794
from
No
famine.
5,764,543.
decrease: 751,251. Yet emigration in this period 1,210,000. Hence there was an accretion of 460,000 during the ten years. Because 751,251 +
over
claimed
nearly
460,000=the
claimed
number
almost
0.7 1.1 The
triple
must
births those
munity.
20 and 1:3.98
the
35
or
accretion.
and
population
of
And
per the
probably
to
persons
in the 25.06 of
depend bear
of
even
The
35
proportion
Emigration
the while
increase
on the
lower of
the
rest
accretion
of
considerably
simple.
the
rate
The
hence
principally
20
between
Now
emigration
per cent.
emigrants=1,211,251.
of
per cent per year, per cent of 1831-41. explanation is very
by
which
by
in
not
Hence,
famine.
had
Out
That
but
per
would
was
it
1,274,213.
the
out
it
2,558,720.
million,
1.1
population
however,
decreased
borne
was
1841-51,
was
for
a
the
If
fact,
Over
1,284,507,
tion
approximate-
than
not
1831-41
in
deficit
accounted
population
Absolute
In
the
unaccounted
This
a year.
cent
1851.
in
emigration
the
or
Accretion
in
proportion
Consequently,
was
Annual
(annual)
per
11/19
The
1847.
decrease.
Population
The in
does
since
the
during
higher
alone
population
the
of
emigration
considerably
of
2/5 of the total 1845-66 which approximately
in
population
of
emigration the
of
Decrease
was
it
Kingdom
1831-41
accretion
(About
of.)
United
In
the
half
decrease
of
(Unheard the
from
part
for
1,990,244,
emigrated
there
In
naturally
a
than
popula-
proportion of
between
the
United Kingdom their proportion
cent, present day is about 1:1.89 still greater in Ireland.
comages of
the
is about in the
or
52.76
K A RL
148
Physical
Deterioration 1806,
In
excess of with a total
males
over
females
but
an
absolute
Insane,
idiotic,
the
of
total
total
total ber
the
the
on
number
lame
the
their
had and
and
total
the
decrease
1861, notwithstanding 14,098.
blind,
1851
on
473,
on
the
their
on
225,
by
9,980;
of
enormously,
by
by
relative,
Contrasting
1,092,
idiotic,
a
of
deaf-mutes,
decrepit
by
former
only
decreased
increased
blind
lunatic
of
1867,
in
an excess
is
not
time
was
there
whilst
there
inhabitants. had
the
4,375;
of
4,118,
of
in
population
5,180;
of
same
the
deaf-mutes
5,767;
of
At
decrepit the
5,574,107,
of
50,469,
by
5,557,196,
of
increase
number
former
population females
and
whilst
former
total
males.
1861,
Population
over
population
the
with
a
with
an
the
of
MA RX
their
their
former
numup, in
immense mounting
in
the
population,
20
per
cent
to
Wages Wages
not
have
potato famine. cent, and 100
more
risen
The
price
per
than
potatoes
of
on
cent
has
risen
an
average
the
Economist
since
the
per
200
nearly
essential
of
food
products. Professor
Leslie,
Cliffe
a
“After
out
loss
of
two-fifths
most does not
of
the
go
farther
than
ordinary
food
the
labourer
Partial
island
famines
Bankruptcy of etc., fall to ruin.
In
Results
of
1855-66,
livestock
This
(cattle, of
crease
horses
of horse),
cretion.
did
worse
especially
than
off
in
shopkeepers
9,
he
Munster is
to
Owing
was
years, througha day; a shilling
21 1s.
in only
ten
and
this
rise
years
in
the
ago.”
Connaught.
permanent.
Market
towns,
Process Inshmen
sheep
livestock which
population
wages is now 21 years ago.
of
6d. is
the
of
rate
the
1,032,694
accretion
one
February
of
says:
1867,
The
in
(20,656)
are
and
replaced
pigs).
during
That,
that
in
period,
compensated therefore
996,877
by
by
subtracted
fact,
with eight from
head
of
was
the
the
de-
sheep
(to
the
ac-
OUTLINE
OF
REPORT
120,000. particularly
and
over of
who
and
about
500
acres
tion
flax;
on
Viceroy
sum,
In
Protestant
a
it is
Meagher,
question
Hennessy, DECREASE
was
total
held
area:
569,544
by
of
gear.
full
Ulster.
(Cultiva-
tenants.)
over-population,
Dufferin:
(Ireland’s
to less than 100 acres, tenants with over 100 and
in
officially etc., system. He, too,
this
affected
up
by
consolidation
Scottish
decrease
farms
tenants).
(31,927
of
Times,
The
area acres
one
of
acres)
and
farms
the
was
farms
acres.
15
the
of
acre
Thus,
under
12,000,000
plots
decrease
15-30
of
of
million
over
process
of
Lord
(8
and
The
3/5
worked 2/5
total
increased.)
one to
or
acres)
the
number
about
20,319,924
tenants
the
farms
1861
In
149
QUESTION
1861
(Though
acres
30
to
1851
From
IRISH
of Farms
Consolidation
of
ON
life
Abercorn
congratulates is one etc.* and
these
of
devastators.
death.
** Jrishman.14® OF
CRIME
IN
IRELAND
Committed
for
Convicted
trial
1852
17,678
10,454
1866
4,326
2,418
V
S T A T ES
T ED UNI
., , ,. ,
i s he d P ubl
in : Marx
l ec t e d Co l
W ork s
ed
Russ ian M osco w
Vol
an d
Enge ls
second 16
1960
* **
See See
pp. p.
124-25.—Ed. 158.—Ed.
,
A ND
A NI SM FENI
.
nt e d P ri
according t o t h e in
manuscrip t
sh E ng li
P art
t rans la t e d
G e rm an
and
o f t h e manuscrip t
f rom
the
G erma n
as
[RECORD
A
OF
DELIVERED
SPEECH
BY
WORKERS’
IN
KARL
MARX
LONDON
ON
16,
Karl
IRISH
GERMAN
ASSOCIATION
16,
DECEMBER
Marx
_
QUESTION
THE
TO
EDUCATIONAL
December
On
THE
ON
1867]
a
delivered
to
lecture
the
German Workers’ Educational Association on conditions in Ireland, in which he proved that all attempts the English government to Anglicise the Irish population
London
past
the of
in
centuries had ended in failure. The English, including aristocrats, who immigrated before the Reformation!’ were transformed into Irishmen by their Irish wives and their descendants
war of
against
crops
area
the
Irish
and
to
the
anything. received
they
would
be
time,
the
the
West
Indies.
favours.
which
only
to
Protestant
action
means
to
allowed
were itance;
were
not
to
means
Queen
oppression. hold
allowed
be
a for
an
on
a
III, the
any
price.
the
new
and Irish
Anne.
The who
with
power Irish industry was to sell their raw the
help
be
to make wills, Catholic bishop
could
not
claim
Irish
was of
freedom
was a
were
Catholic not
the
the
of
Parliament!29
could
robbing
in
received
received
were
Irish
slaves
to
post,
official
that
the
as
came
With
Irish
not
Ireland
aristocrats
Those
did
Cromwell’s
of them class
money,
one
merchant
In
fought
many
from
condition
people.
colonists
force
at
Laws,
and
Restoration,!28
make
to
England
under
of
to
population
land
the
of
destruction
colonists
English
sold
the
English of
William
order
Penal
by
the
Under
in
materials
plots
of these Cromwell
Under
wanted
suppressed
large
brutalities
gentlemen
for
time,
colonised
English.
the
of
place
that
The
Elizabeth,
Queen
make
descendants
the
many
of
under
At
adventurers
against
England.
displacement
to
another
change
against
fought
not
landowners,
high
treason.
their
land;
yet
an
inher-
All
these 50
over
RECORD
OF
MARX’S
per
cent Catholic.
SPEECH
the
of
The
people
were
who
aristocracy
become
in
Irish.
among
the During
a
during
little.
the
French drove
by
The
bribery.
Irish is
the
have
land;
tors;
land
reached high.
London,
the
set
in
there
was
a
starvation.
soil,
Through
and
there,
position be
of
the
still
paid.
on High
remaining
names
a
prices
on
and
owing
1846.
A
of
the
the English
prices
small
landowners
Irish been
stages
were
to
speculait
before
water; eaten up
and
was
was
to
blight
people
the
died
of
exhaustion
Ireland the
with
Famine
potato
the
and
sent
exported
exhausted.
Laws
meat
all have
£7,000,000
market,
for
reviving
to
lands
million
Corn
Union
necessity
potatoes the rent
was
soil
the
we
her
English
disproportionately
Fertilisers the
that
to
vital
were
granted
said:
lease
five
1836,
In
be The
all
their
England;
in
famine
repeal
no
have
reins
blow
potato blight resulted from product of English rule.
monopoly longer
or
Florence.
here
the
an
achieved
became
lived
to
and
was a
it
sent
rent,
The
the
plant
quickly
Meagher
made
landowners.
general
that
to
the
death
leased
this
and
produce
It
four
and
and
All
to
destroyed,
population
absent
often
the
through
Paris
to
abroad
the
been
coffins.
were
and
occasion
landowners
meat
and
the
English
English.
rebellion
the
agrarian
of
English
had
the
delivered have
peasant,
the
rose so
Ireland
of
passed
The
to
one
big
by
are so many
outstrip
them On
built
concessions
making
the
wheat in
to
industry
of
was
Independence
of
revolution.
Union
industry.
branches
arms
the
doing
remained
e War
Further
threatened
government
left
is why
Fenians. the American
loosened people
That
have
powerful.
in
towns there
The
Ulster
into
became
succeeded
Ireland.
in
driven
thus
151
QUESTION
descendants
government
English
IRISH
English
clergy,
Catholic
ON
rent
old the
lost
of
her could
bankruptcy
contributed
to
transformation
of
a
of
further
the eviction of their land mto
the small peasants and the sheep pastures. Over half
arable
not been tilled since 1860. The yield per oats by 16 per cent, flax by 36 per cent, per cent. At present only oats are cultivated
acre
acres
land have has dropped:
potatoes for
million
the
With riorated
by
50
English
market,
and
wheat
the exhaustion of the physically. There has
1s imported. soil, been
the
an
population has deteabsolute increase in
152
RECORD
the
number
decreasing
sheep.
The
Irish
question,
to
else
decide be
emigration
English
Published Collected
Russian Moscow,
QUESTION
insane
in
at
will
the
and
the
Marx
Works, ed.,
Vol.
1960
and second
16,
question
lead
Engels,
to
of
If that
a war
does with
amounts
not
with
a
once
place
for
simply
a
are
happen leave
The
sheep.
discussion sheep. nationality
or
Ruin
convinced
that
quickly. it to the
The Irish
landownership. not happen America.
to collecting
Translated
with
Europe.
existence.
Irish
separation
at present aristocracy.
in:
and
the
must
all
in
of
there
it
useless.
Ireland
all
replaced
Russians,
was
land
of
happen
would
with
to make therefore not
is
demand
been
towns
watchword;
to
should
over
IRISH
and
unheard
China
question
the
is
themselves Irish tion
a
in
destroy
question
is
anything
thing
ON
dumb,
have
thing
Poles
Mongols
but
revolution
a
is
evicted
the
or not to
whether
SPEECH
and
deaf
people
This
replace
under
English
blind,
1,100,000
Russians
if
lame,
MARX’S
population.
Over 9,600,000
Only
of
OF
from
The
Every-
soon
the domina-
rent
for
the
German
the
EXCERPTS
FROM
WRITTEN
LETTERS
1867
BETWEEN
MARX
TO
LUDWIG
[IRELAND
ON
1868
AND
KUGELMANN 11,
1867
people
asa
October
Ernest
representative there
is
was
Jones
speak
in
party,
the
of
identical
to
with
and,
England’s
to
Ireland since
Irish
big
ownership
landownership
of Ireland,
never
to speak against big landownership. You should for general principles in the hustings speeches politicians
but
only
what
for
MARX
is useful
TO
the
for
proceedings
every
inch
what
a row
have the
what
could
zmmediate
in
every
workers
Fenians
in
expected.}39
up
kicked
way
to support
in
aim.
ENGELS
the
be
people”
“our
sought English
against
look
English
of
2,
November
The
was
he
in
provoke of
1867
were
Manchester
You the
will
League.
Reform
this
seen
have
manifestation
Fenianism.!
[ of
31
Greetings. Yours, K.
Previously impossible. tion
*
Now
may
there
evidenced year,!32 form of
I thought
by
I think
come the
it
federation.
Abercorn.—Ed.
separation
inevitable,
Agricultural
which appeared the eviction. The
Lord
Ireland’s
a
few
Irish
How
the
Statistics
days Viceroy,
ago.
England
from
although English for
M.
separacarry on is
after
the
current
Furthermore, Lord Abicorn*
the (that
154
MARX
seems
to
be
weeks
by
forcibly
were
his
name),
did
foreign
the
stock
political
thousands
tenants,
whose
adopt
this
population.
grounds;
the
ENGELS
How
low
first
swore
M.):
“Then
John?
invest-
country
expropriation
of
solely
on
Prussia
out.
buy
MARX
TO
judges
when
Willzam
you
reward
is
Abercom’s
but
later
5,
demonstrated
witness said
that
Beck
(who
was
John
it
to swear to fall to pieces more
will
accused;
of
perjury
where
can
I
read
greater
in
detail
about
evictions?
TO
ENGELS
7,
November
about
was a
to
get
There
manage
a
for
incredible.
MARX
tions
1867
you meant
and
batch
was
sunk
asked
prosecution
simply
me
tell
have
he
William
new
each
£200
you
Can
to whole
the
with
of
Martin
swore
I think
”
Lord
English
Blackburne
to
more
and
the
by
them
and
November
yesterday
few
Among
confiscate
in Wester
1867
last
European
direct
of
Russians
Prussians
the
improvements
form
The
in
people.
other
7,
NOVEMBER
estate of
no
In
confiscated!
rule
ENGELS,
his
“cleared”
evicting
prosperous were thus
ments
TO
a
detailed
again
description
ago
fortnight
in
the
issue
at
which
The that
the
of
Abercom
Irishman
was
lent
1867
evic-
(Dublin).
to
me
for
I only
may 24
hours. At
the
meeting,
Bradlaugh seconded Fenians
by
Acland’s
our the
was
lecture
we
is
in
intelligent
the
speech and
a stormy
heads,
which
Fox
which
was
there
a
made
on had
Cremer,
passed
our
Ireland,
a
tabled
unanimously.
demonstration the
Dickson
Colonel
about
Reform meeting
Bill
in
down
old
the
basement). This business stirs part of the working class here.
for
the
too,
Tuesday,
33
during
Hall
{above
coffee
room,
Fenians!
Cleveland in
and
Weston,
resolution Last
the
for
presided
our
the
feelings
of
ENGELS
MARX,
TO
ENGELS
The
ness,
and
the
openly
thing
1867
155
LUDWIG
a very
London the
for
splendid
TO
are
too,
Irish,
29,
NOVEMBER
KUGELMANN
substantial
proletarians
Fenians
and,
here—for,
November
8,
1867
in
this
busi-
ferment
_cvery
declare
hence—an*
a
first,
violent
day
more
unheard-of
and
and,
movement.
anti-English
ENGELS
MARX
TO
24,
November Dear
an
secondly,
1867
Moor,
am
I
returning
yesterday
So England
and
lacked
were
Derby
and
made
the
which
it
now
well
To
my
executed of
They
have
been
as
a
John
have
wished
least
the
the
a
at
is
being
a common
crime.
Deasy
Irish
only
with the
of
the
babe
the
beastliness *
Michael
of
the the
Larkin,
by has
deed
as
cradle
in
will
civilised
Ferry.
precedent.
treat
done
that
a
do
J.
to
Brown
that
Fenians
English William
must Allen
the
not had at
could
Southerners
as a rebel, a political
been
was
whereas
here
attempt
into
29,
1867
MARX
TO
you
Fenians
has
country
The The
transform
anybody
November
regards
these
heroic
in
still
three*
women
Irish
time in
ENGELS
As
Colbetween
Fenians
provided
and
Harpers
better
to
decency
everything
the
execution
The
Mr.
of
separation that
every
matter
similar
Brown
hand
women.
Polish
for
to
America.
knowledge, for
Kelly
sung
and
the
the
the
of
thing
of
be
by
only
Only
liberation
as
Tories, final act
The
Hardy.
England
the
the
martyrs. G.
letters.
morning
Ireland.
will
Ireland,
case
encl.
accomplished
craft,
just
the
are not
and
quite
make Michael
us O’
right.!34* forget Brien.—Ed.
that
The the
156
MARX
leaders
we
are in any way which occur sect
this
of
cannot
stupidities
TO
asses
mostly make
and
30,
NOVEMBER
partly
ourselves
every
in
ENGELS,
1867
exploiters
responsible
conspiracy.
And
and
for
the
they
are
to happen. I need not tell you home too.!3° The
certain
that black and green predominate in my English press has once again behaved most meanly. Larkin is said to have fainted and the others* to have looked pale and confused. The Catholic pnests who
were
there
declare
on a
stumbled
courage.
Allen nothing to
same
again.
By
insolent—on churches
not of
the
he
way, the it was given three men had
these
MARX
TO
them
deed,
out
he
he
you
read
the
papers
do
the
very m
pulpit
all
murdered.
ENGELS
30,
November
If
had
were
the
from
been
bitterly
would
priests
Catholic
great
showed
saying
liberty
say,
they
complained
his
at
Larkin,
of
Salford
of
were
lie.
three
of
repent
and
a
is
the
Sunday
that
and
bishop
Catholic
would repent
this
spot
rough
The
that
that
you
will
seen
have
1867
that
1)
the
Memorial of the International Council for the Fenians** was sent to Hardy, and that 2) the debate on Fenianism was public (last Tuesday*** week) and reported in The Times.13® Reporters of the Dublin /rishman and Nation were among those present. [ came very late (I ran a temperature for about a fortnight and the fever passed only two days ago) and really did not intend to speak, firstly because of my troublesome
physical
ticklish
situation.
to obliged
force
tried what
the
me
I had
pomts *
See
***
The
FXE*E
to, speak
a
pp. 19th
pp.
I moved
and
secondly
for
an
Tuesday.****
for
Tuesday
But
Michael
O’
of
November. 26th.—Ed.
130-35—Ed.
See
was Irish
Brien.—Ed.
pp.
in
485-89.—Ed.
a matter not
a
of
the
adjournment,
As
last
the
because
was
who
last
speech.*****
Allen
and
Weston,
128-29.—Ed.
November See
so
prepared
of
William
**
****
me to
condition,
However
the
chair,
which
of
fact
speech
but
reporters
failed
to
MARX
TO
come, the
ENGELS,
and
waiting
them
for
it
157
had
9
become
o’clock,
while
was at our disposal only till 10.30. Fox quarrel in the Council he had not shown the past 2 weeks, and had moreover sent in his as member of the Council, contaming rude Jung!37) had, at my request, prepared a long the
of
himself
for
resignation attacks on speech.
the
After
would
yield
the
opening
Fox)
instead
the
meeting, crowd
did like
ered
an
only
the
he
it and
it referred
What
new
and
analysing
one
to
Roman
sense),
that,
by
1801-46,
with
its
cattle-raising.)
any
at of
its
that
rate
of
was the
affairs
because
be
more
by
pigs
period
and
of
hastened of
the
a
or
were land
entirely
and
by
than
Corn
(in
the
wants system
to
collapsed
in
which The
by
the
Irish
England’s
com
especially
Laws,
partly
of
occurrgood the
for
result
deprived
famine,
supply
to
who
Cromwell,
exceptional,
the
a
being
colonists
is
1s
sense,
negative
oxen!
of
Fenianism
middlemen,
evictions
where
an
into
the
aim
ridiculous
system, and
1846
since
soil)
English
present
rack-rents
repeal
the
Elizabeth
Insh
sheep,
monopoly
can
(in
of
to
38
political this,
of
The
I objected
is that
tendency
of
the
inane.
entered
very
For that things.
Committee.!
have
What
of
the
deliv-
it concemed
aspects.
also
was
it
because
know
appropriation
Leinster The
yet
Ireland
the
because
and
therefore
precisely
with
them
in
had
Irish
surface
Standing
socialistic
the
supplant
(During
that
state
the
thing
absurd
not
do
supplant
mainly
hour.
revolutionary
The
another
for
the
barbarities
wanted
Ireland
to
in
a
hurl
intended.
was
movement.
the
confuse
or
up
and
by
against orders
1846.
to
forced
for
and
English
characterised lower
good,
content
phase,
belated
I
reporters away and delaying the opening of the service for me. I don’t like to mix with a Stephens, and the rest.
domination
directed
soberly I had
handed
the
economic English
been
of
Englishman
resolution had
stated
executions
political and international just skimmed along the
he
the
of
Manchester
as
was
speech
by
reason
signal
Roberts,
Fox’s
I tlterefore
on account
Fox
have
movement therefore, by staying and
sitting
the meantime—our subject, Fenianism, the passions to such heat that J (but not would
thunderbolts
the
of
the
of
place in to inflame
abstract
to
floor
Actually—because
taken liable
of
1867
establishment
(because
ing
30,
NOVEMBER
in
normal
158
MARX
times.
Wool
tillage
into
meat pasture.
and
consolidation
of
a mass
turned lords,
hastened
land!
is
stupid
it.
the
from
then
purpose
Meagher’s
hence
rule
in London change since
Hennessy
systematic
Estates
Proclamation
of
of
Act,
which
middlemen into landof the Estate of Ire-
English
of
1867
conversion
onwards
enriched Clearing
immense
manifesto
(1866),
slogan,
30,
NOVEMBER
Encumbered
government
From
election
one
this
itself
know
The
ENGELS,
the
previously the process.
the
English of
course
Hence
farms.
of
now
became
TO
in
knows 1846.
The
nothing of But the Irish
(1848)
(Tory
Ireland.
to
down
and
the
Urquhartite)
Irish
have expressed their consciousness of it in the clearest and most forcible manner. The question now 1s, what shall we advise the English workers? In my opinion they must make the Repeal of the Union (in short, the affair of 1783, only democratised and adapted to the conditions of the nunztamento.139 This is the only sible
form
Irish
of
programme of whether a mere the
two
2) world
can
the
personal
think
and
their
pro-
therefore
only
pos-
An
agrarian
revolution.
English
cannot
the
to subsist
continue
can
it
if it takes
independence
the
them
and
of
article
between
place in
time.
1s:
need
Self-government
give
legal
can
union
I half
Irish
an
emancipation which can be admitted in the English party. Experience must show later
countries.
What
1)
an
time)
With
the
accomplish
means
legal
England.
from best
this
intentions them,
for
accomplishing
of
in the
but
it
they them-
for
selves.
1801
3) Protective tariffs against England. Between 1783 and every branch of Irish industry flourished. The Union,
which
overthrew
Parliament,
linen
had
measures etc., and
others.
turn
them
taken
Before
no
is
just the
for
by
industrial
same English
the
I present
this
you to
time give
are as
views
fortunately
me
the
Parliament
Irish
my
on
of
protectionists,
Tuesday,
life
your
in
by
Ireland.
whatever.
effect
suppression
the Once
into
all
established
tariffs
compensation
the
would
like
protective
destroyed
industry
1801
the
the The
The
Insh
woollen
under
Anne,
independent,
bit
Union
as
industry
Irish
the
George
etc.
Australia,
in
the
Central
Council
(next
reporters),!4#9
a
few
I,
will
Canada,
in
of
necessity
did
without
of
industry,
it
opinion
Irish
lines.
|
MARX
TO
ENGELS,
16,
MARCH
1868
MARX
159
TO
ENGELS
14,
December
Dear
Fred,
The
very
last
exploit
stupid
sympathy
thing.
the
of The
Ireland, will be of the government proletarians to allow
London honour
of
the
fatality
about
Fenian
in
masses,
to
themselves There
éemissaries.
a secret,
such
Clerkenwell! 4! was a who haye shown great made wild by it and driven into party. One cannot expect the
Fenians
London
for
arms
the
be
is
a
The
stupid
few
spiracies
in
affair
specialised
MARX
TO
that
they
to
lead
was
Clerkenwell it
fanatics;
such
in of
conspiracy.
of
December
a
up kind
blown
always
sort
melodramatic
ENGELS
of
1867
is
the
obviously
misfortune
stupidities,
of
because
19,
1867
the
work
con-
all
all
“‘after
something must happen, after all something must be done”. In particular, there has been a lot of bluster in America about this blowing up and arson business, and then a few asses
come
and
are
instigate
seems
generally to have
the
idea
of
on
fire!
shop
nonsense.
such
greatest
the
already
liberating
Moreover,
cowards,
turned Ireland
MARX
TO
like
this
setting
a
who
and
then
London
present
prisoners enced and
to
in
Ireland,
ordinary
Sullivan
happening
way
on
of
the
in and
prison the
which also
Continent,
42
16,
1868
the English treat political suspects, or even those sent-
terms
News)!
tailor’s
ENGELS
March
The
cannibals
Allen,
evidence,
Queen’s
by
these
(like is
except
Pigott
really in
The
Inshman
worse
than
anything
Russia.
What
of
dogs!
MA RX
16 0
MARX
TO
K U G EL MA NN
L UDW I G
TO
LUDWIG
, ,
been
Irish
exploited
to
order
as
the
the
workers’
party;
the
and
Potter,
now
have
bourgeois
However,
6, 1868
a new
Ireland.
is
a
only
England
And in
penalty
what
bulwark time
as
a
Church
in
Ireland
will
Ireland
and
from
the
from
the
am
(I
will
followed then
first
of
the
events
is
workers,
into
attaching
in
that
bottom,
long
run
speaking The
mean by
the
England.
the
that
which
the
next
themselves
con-
England—and
it will
see, the English use to call here
landowner.)
be
based
paying
many
benefit
the
for the centuries English
Established Church the Jnsh Church—is
of English landlordism im Ireland, and outpost of the Established Church in
the
herself.
Church
two
get
working class—is committing for
the
You they
itself.
the religious at the same
turn
in
an on
have
Liberals.
this
working class in Ireland—or
to
for
be
among
intriguers
excuse
will
has
only
to
all,
this
It
course,
of
which
want
now.
just
above
moment
who
sequently also the English great crime she has been against
and,
elections,
For
Odger
Parliament,
to
next
the
here
company,
and again,
office
suffrage.!43
the
for
at
predominates
Gladstone
into
cry
household such
by
get
electoral bad
question
18 68
KUGELMANN
April The
6
A PRI L
social
is, from
here
overthrow
its
downfall doom
I have,
of
of of
in
Established
the
Established
and
the
landlordism—first
in
however,
must landownership.
revolution
the
England been
begin
convinced
seriously
Karl
Marx
[ON THE REFUSAL BY THE ENGLISH PRESS TAKE NOTICE OF THE GROWTH OF SYMPATHY WITH IRELAND AMONG ENGLISH WORKERS AND ON THE OPENING OF THE DEBATE ON THE IRISH QUESTION
TO
(Record From
the
of
the
Minutes
26
of October
and
Speech
the
of
and
General
Meetings
Council
9,
November
the Letter.
of
Content
1869)
}
I
Marx
Cit.
passed
would
feature
that
said
at
be
prejudice
against
addressed
to
good
suppressed
a part
least
principal by
the
the
English
Irish.
This
of
the
not
somebody,
to
opportunity
do
was
thing
demonstration!44
the
of
the
press.
London had
been
working
was
whatever The
ignored,
class
had
main
was
it
lost
their
put in writing government. He thought
might
the
be
and
a
it
something.... i
The had
been
Cit.
English
to The
put
on
Published The First
the
6-226
it
prisoners.
Jung
a
read
on
in
class
was
Moscow
Marx
Cit.
Marx
the
the
attitude (2) The Irish.
support
in
proposed
(1) The question;
towards
adopted
of
the
Cit.
of
the
discussion
of
of the attitude Marx
British of the volunte-
and
the
questions
Printed of
to be
ordered
day.
book
Council
International.
from
debate.
order the
Cit.
questions: the Irish
the
report the
letter
adopted,
working
open
General
Minutes,
that
Sub-Committee
not to proceed with an address on the Irish because if the views of the Council were properthe government and the press would turn them
report and, if the following Government ered
the
from
agreed
question! 45 ly set forth, against
reported
Secretary
the
1868-1870.
of
the
according book
to
the
text
Karl
THE
[ON
POLICY
WITH
(Record From
the
of
the
Meeting
and the
of
Marx
Cit.
then
GOVERNMENT
IRISH
PRISONERS
Resolution.
Draft General
16,
of November
BRITISH
THE
TO
Speech
Minutes
THE
OF
RESPECT
Marx
Council
1869)|
opened
the
on
debate
the
attitude
the
of
British Government on the Irish question. He said political amnesty proceeds from two sources: 1. When a government is strong enough by force of arms and public opinion, when the enemy accepts the defeat, as was the case in America,!46 then amnesty is given. 2. When misgovernment is the cause of quarrel
and
the
opposition
Austria
and
Hungary.!
4’
gains
its
poimt,
the
case
in
been
the
case
in
to have
ought
Such
as was
Ireland.
Both
Disraeli ought to
ment
revolution would
was
do
would
always made.
revolted
nife
During
the
and
Bright
he
nothing.
municipalities.
petition prisoners
appearance came, it was Then it was
a
When
anticipated
it
way
giving
of
got
up
mooted
in
not
have
as
by the
change
the
Fenian have
taunted
in
was
in
against
Ireland
about
signatures
the
for
some pressure.
releasing
to
would
the the
“Ireland ought to be an end to the “‘policy
movement
by
Ireland
begun like America became minister. He
he
a
countries that
nation
When
govern-
the
radical
declarations
deputation
200,000
containing he
to
amnesty
the
other
that To put
as soon
a
justified
implied
ought
other
unless
fiery
ideas’.
that
repeatedly
Gladstone
his
amnesty
Then
in
circumstances.
“policy of conquest”!48 ruled according to Irish
conquest” Austria by an
what
every
that
equivocated
of
said
asserted
election
similar
have
revolution
for
said
under he
Gladstone for Ireland
do.
be
insurrection
House
and
Irish Fenians,
but
House
that
he the
by
and did the
to start with a release of the to prevent the The
gave
petition
no
prisoners
answer. were
THE
ON
POLICY
treated.
infamously impartial;
in
THE
OF
treats
it
Europe
BRITISH
In this at least the English Government is Irish and English alike; there is no country
where
England
and
political
Russia.
at which
was was
Bruce
30,000
the
unconditional
all
the
towns
announced announced trade
in
in
weeks
societies
tion
of
was was
not
the
a
wanted
people the
for
in
Isaac
procession.
to
The
the
procgo
8th
to
procession
interpreted
went
They
It
October.
On
as a
it
to
Fortescue
in
was was
meeting
10th
the
for
held
attended.
procession.
Butt
were
great
the
fact.
memorial
Meetings
prohibiting
streets.
collision.
of
After
August
procession
was
abandoned
the soldiers occasion.
had
been
The
shot
that for the
that
Gladstone
answered
the
a
roundabout
way.!49
He
in
There were demanding
varied much. bad language of
go
to
issued
afterwards
rounds
Then
200,000
the
commenced meeting was
a
and
in
prohibi-
ask
but
he
at home, his Secretary Burke did not know. A letter to be replied to; he equivocated. The government
left
found
North. where
wanted
certain
adopted.
beforehand
were
lamations through
the
Dublin
Then Limerick. A
present
like
admit
refused.
at
was
treated
to
obliged
were
people
release
are
prisoners
Moore wanted an inquiry; it the popular amnesty movement held
163
GOVERNMENT
and
with
40
memorial
of
supplied
Limerick
says
was
it
the
proceedings
loyal people and others who right what could only be
used
as a
an act
clemency.
an
1s
It
servant The
act
of
a
to teach next
How that
does
they
meeting is
designs
entertain
know
wants
He
degrade
them
renounce
their republican and Prussia attached
amnesty Then America.
he
If it did,
only
morally.
them
says
the
Scotland
“disaffection
of
Napoleon
cut their
he
short designs
their
Yard
would
700
years’
exists
soon
be
ask
were
and
in
to to
gave
England
The
upon Irish
a
into
people
he
down
standing’’.
their
principles,
[not]
still
not
by
them
principles before no such conditions.
conspiracy
public
have
tortured
renounce did
paid
prisoners
were what
a
of
speak.
the
Has
to
to
how
that
them?
part
the
which
Gladstone
still
confession?
public
objection
abandoned their imprisonment.
on
presumption
an and
it. It
is
have
164
KARL
declared of in
they
would
conciliation. America, his
Head
receive
cannot quell the Fenian conspiracy promotes it, one paper calls him the finds fault with the press. He has not the
conduct
He
courage
to
prisoners
responsible.
the
has
been
This
is
to
keep
people
to
to
had of
dismissed
and
was
crowded
them.
with
untried
we
M’Donnell
higher
was
Murray
says:
a
to
prisons,
He then released; the
“‘it
point’’.
point.
suppressed
inspector
says
utmost
the
the
hostages
He
outside?
leniency
make
as
them
wrote letter after letter to treatment. Lord Mayo said
their
Murray
carry
utmost
Mountjoy
M’Donnell
about
the
wants
he
want
he
of
to
desire
the
press;
the
Does
behaviour
our
then
When Dr.
prosecute
good
as an act
freedom
Gladstone
Centre.!5°
for
unconditional
MARX
Joseph
Murray that
afterwards
wrote
then
was
He
official.
prisoners,
to
the
afterwards
promoted.*
principal
have advised leaders and
positive
lie.
There
years
each.
the minor organisers
offenders
we
could
to be not set
free.
This
a
is
15
them
who
had
made
him
set
years,
he he
is in could
home, He
the
English,
can
tion
the
have
The
enlightened Irish
give
was
could the
Irish
The
badge the
is
interest
See
the
were
the
the
only
p.
5!
servants
to
is
259.—Ed.
the
resolved
have
before
upon
question
and
an only
catch
excuse the
administra-
badge
continue
because
Irish the of
of
crimes.
a great
done
remains.
to
of
knees
the
against
oppressors
the
which
servitude
to
of
their
Parliament
criminals
not
punishment
on
fall
place-hunters but
the
the
Imsh
was
continues, the
are and
was
except
him
the public order in this country. it
because
He
ministers
church
removed,
government *
no
become
selves.152
right
government.!
sovereign
They
was
wanted
family
rise in revolt against in this country. Only
revolt
wants
He
justice. Bright
to
crime
administration
Jreland.
the
says:
Davis’s
Carey
lunatic asylum, his upset the government.
not
a
been
Jefferson
free.
the
further
ever
has
them
were two Americans amongst It was fear for America that was sentenced in 1865 to 5
people.
act
of
an of
But
Gladstone
and
dissenters
and
selling
them-
conquest.
The
states
that
He
remove
any
griev-
THE
ON
POLICY
ance,
but
that
property
own power
same
greatest could
stupidity
to
more
his
“You
cases
leaven
letter
to
Isaac
Butt
me
that
The
guilty
were
I
and
exceptional
tribunals
the
government
for
a
If
poacher
by
his
is
and
of
Parliament,
are. out
whole
the
It of
is
the
prison
nation.
comes
out
The
in
the
ask.
for
foreigners.
when
sentenced
by
lawful
The
prisoners
were
tried
judges
who
they
two custom
the
Can
to
of
were
they
depended
bread.”
tried
by
countrymen.
It
a is
are made up of purveyors to upon their verdict. Oppression England the judges can be cannot. Their promotion government. Sullivan the the
a
aris-
nothing
they
according countrymen.
their
of
tried
by
to
conqueror you must he says:
not
tried
and
impairing
know
prisonérs
once pleaded were tried
jury
and
upon
tried
the
Fenians
a
by
arrested
them where
insulting
the but
without
Irsh
leave
than
of grant
the
them that
will
found
Naples
think
we
remind
to life
security
laws!53
but
landed
dangerous
correspond?
and
own
her
empire, they must
has
to give
integrity of the empire. endangered by the English
are
the
affairs,
old English statement:
the
makes
165
GOVERNMENT
determined
property
that
be
In
are
maintain
tocracy. Canada the integrity of their
BRITISH
they
and and
Life
THE
OF
jury
country
of
notorious the is
that
squires the
Irish
1s
he
juries
castle whose bread depends always a lawful custom. In
independent,
depends
upon
prosecutor
has
in
Ireland
how been
they made
they
serve
the
master
of
rolls. To
the
Ancient
Order
Foresters
of
in
Dublin
he
answered
not aware that he had given a pledge that Ireland to be governed according to Irish ideas.!°4 And after all he comes to Guild-Hall and complains that he is inade-
that
was
he
was this
quate for the task. The upshot is broken
up;
broken
with
Ireland it.*
is to
They
ing
him *
This
Book.—Ed.
have
a
they the
that all the tenant right meetings are want the prisoners [released]. They have clerical party. They now demand that
govern
herself.
resolved
member
of
sentence
was
to
Moore liberate
Parliament.! inserted
and
Butt
have
O'Donovan
declared
Rossa
by
for
elect-
55
between
the
lines
of
the
Minute
166
KARL
Marx
Cit.
ended
by
proposing
the
MARX
resolution:
following
Resolved,
That
the
in
his
to
letter
d.d.
Mr.
the
Irish
d.d.
O’Shea
1869)
18,
Oct.
Mr.
1869,
release
contained to
and
has
Gladstone
the
for
Mr.
in
Isaac
deliberately
of
his Butt
insulted
nation;
That
he
clogs
to
degrading they
Irish
23,
Oct.
to the Irish demands patriots (in a reply
reply
imprisoned
amnesty
political
the
victims
with
conditions
misgovernment
of
and
alike
the
people
to;
belong
That publicly
having in the teeth of his responsible position and enthusiastically cheered on the American slave-
holders’
rebellion,
people
the
That
whole
That Men’s
by
ousted
Gladstone
the
true the
the his
General
Tory
Council
express manner in
Association
and high-souled their amnesty movement; That of,
this
and
tional
resolution
be
men’s
working
Working
Men’s
to
in
preach
to
the
Insh
reference
to
the
Irish
obedience;
proceedings
are
conquest’
of
steps
passive
of
question
“policy Mr.
doctrine his
amnesty
now
he
with and
genuine
denunciation
fiery rivals
from
the
of
their
which
spirited
carry
people
to
connected
that
Working
the
of
Irish
communicated
in
of
International
the
Association
of
office;
admiration
which
bodies
offspring
all the
with,
Europe
branches
the
and
on
Interna-
the
United
States.
‘The
resolution
published
November-December number
papers.
the
of
of
in:
Collected
Works,
Russian
ed.,
a
International’s
Record
published
Moscow,
in
in
Marx
Vol.
1960
the
speech
and second
16,
Engels,
Printed
according
of
the
book
of
the
First
1868-1870.
The
to
the
General
text Council
International.
Minutes,
Moscow
Karl
THE
[ON
POLICY
WITH
(Record Council From
the
Minutes
General
23
of November
PRISONERS
of the
General
Council
30,
and
GOVERNMENT
IRISH
in Support
the
of
BRITISH
THE
TO
of the Speeches Resolution.
Meetings
THE
OF
RESPECT
Marx
1869)|
I
Marx. I could
Cit.
stone.
Mottershead another, but
Cit.
give
the
question
before
us.
the
meetings
were
quite
which
they
speeches
by
a man
good
Register
as
that
When
didates
the
Irish
spoken
We
comparison I repeat
as
he
might not
as
Political
the
as
reply
as
Irish
I have
writers.
I have
These
the
him
Irish
a
is the
read
killed
war it
abroad,
with
the
because Fenian
in-
1798158 and then to the English. not treated anywhere
with
favourable
prisoners
are
going
to tell other
always
Irish of
of
the
have
and
with
government,
it
Gladstone
has
Times,
the
Saturday
his
opinion
people other
to
of
the
of
the
Continental
that.
the
may
think
and do so still. to release the pnis-
abandoned
sympathy
together. the
us
defended the English are not to be passed
themselves
of
what
Ledru-Rollin!59
resolution
conduct
opposition
be
not know
is
to
resolutions
the
all the Irish canGladstone did nothing
people
compare
political
wants
let
and
was
England.
English
of
same
but
Hungarian
would
that
in
if
It
the
the
commenced
the
the
Mottershead
Cit.
oners,
in
against
at
moved. of
compare
surrection.!57
bad
tour
amnesty,
about
municipalities
cannot
Irish;
with
fault
today
the
adopted
Castlereagh
words
made
electoral
not
I have
so
found
I found
same
the
Cobbett
he
supported.
and
used
spouted
till the
the
but
were
were
which
56
done,.!
you
petitions
civil,
Gladstone
he
and
Gladstone,
The
given a history of Gladhas nothing to do with
has that
Irish
and
bring contend Review,
a
the
review English
with
etc.,
the if
we
168
out
speak
succumb.
was
He he
in
what
for
when
the
to
opposition
responsible low
on
boldly;
an
against
his
declaration,
Cit.
this
to
Odger
not
would
a
make
as
to do
right,
be
the
a
no
had Prime
everything
if
we
way
to
to
concession
Marx
Cit.
ately’,
is
the
Irish
objection Minister
deliberately
.. . .
_
did
so
much
the
the
if the
more
it, but
it
is
people
than
and North
worse
prisoners
to
him
to
have
War
Civil
and
MARX
support
otherwise
the
wanted do
may
might
government
patriotism.
we
side,
he
during
office
the
made
other which
KARL
for
was was his
released, important
Gladstone...
to leave out the word “‘delibermust necessarily be considered .169
II
.
sa id if O d ger’ s s ugges t ions w ere f o llo w e d t he p ut t h emse lv es on a n Eng lis h par t y s t and po int 16 1 T h e y co uld no t d o t h a t T he C o unc il m u s t s h o w t h e Ir is h t ha t t he y u n d ers t oo d t h e q ues t i on and t h e C on t inent t h a t t he y s h o w e d no f a v o ur t o t he B rit is h G o v ern l m u s t t rea t t h e Ir is h lik e t h e E ng lis h w o u l d ment T he C o u nc i t rea t t h e P o lis h C it M a rx C o u nc i l w oul d
, ., , ,.
in : M arx
Publ i s hed C ol l ec t e d
Russ i an M osc o w
T he First
W or k s
ed
Vol
1 96 0
second
a nd
International Moscow
,
16 in
l G enera l C o unc i
Minutes,
E nge ls
an d
t he
b oo k
of t h e
1868-1870.
=
-
~
according t o t h e t e x t
— — P r in t e d
. . ,
of the
b oo k
of t he
Firs t
-
8 68 1 87 0 1
M osco w
T he
l G enera l C o unc i
I nt erna t iona l
nut es Mi
Karl
[IRELAND
FROM THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION TO THE UNION OF 1801 EXTRACTS AND NOTES]!62
1778
I, FROM
A)
The class,
The
the
faith
Ill,
for
movement
the
English
generally.
although conquered, remained of the king up to the peace Britain,
Great
working
France,
and
Ireland,
a separate
and Amiens:163
of
defender
of
the
etc.”’
The Dublin
on
appelate the
mn
regard to with a view
English usurpations principally calculated
monopoly, in
of
1782
before
question
working-class
King
INDEPENDENCE
Parliament
the
of
Until 1800 Ireland, federate kingdom. Title “George
1782.
TO
Irish
importance
and
Marx
one
the
jurisdiction last
hand,
in
to
instance
be
on
and,
regard
to
Parliament at to the mercantile the other, to have the titles of landed estates
the
at
decided
the
London,
only
in
English
courts.
POYNINGS’
A Statute of Edward Poynings, law
whatever,
could
be
Lieutenant
who
British
power then
pass
in
the
discussed, Ireland
of
64
Henry VII, framed by his Attomey General, restrained the Irish Parliament from originating
either
finally
LAW!
and
Lords it his
was Privy
or
Commons.
previously
for
Council,
at their pleasure reject tt, or transmit Attommey General and Privy Council were
might
to
either
return
it
suppress to
Ireland,
it altogether,
with
or
model
permission
it into law. Already Molyneux century). Later, in the 18th century,
etc. Swift
any
Before
to
submitted
to
their
it
Sir
any
statute the
Lord
consideration,
to England. invested with
The and
the
it at
their
own
the
Irish
Parliament
protested against and Dr. Lucas.
will,
this
to
(17th
170
KARL
6, GEORGE
STATUTE
(It
declared
British
instrument
I,
an
decree
to
and
disturb,
rendered
English
nobility.
(This
was
Many
British of
interested
estates.
“and
in which
mere
consequently,
she
the
lst
legislation
the
of
the
or
bad
titles
Irish
property,
or
by
a vote
through
whose
Britain
Union!
encouraged
George
to
for
legislate
and
whereby
which
would
the
British
of of
might
the
be
Scotch
) this
influence
enacted, had themselves been deeply to secure their own grants of Irish of this law England assumed a despotic
measure,
clause
success
the
Lords,
courts,
Commoners,
been
altogether,
British
declared her inherent right to bind should be expressly designated.”
was
It
and,
a
to
Commons
superior
estates
Great
by
that
effecting
to
Irish
Irish
in
and
I had
George in
Irish
questionable
to
re-enacted
Under
power
the
abortive
Peers
the
the
of
absentees!®®
or
Statute
of
nations,
jurtsdiction
judgment
or
or
reversed
House
both
of
neutralise
appellant
and
affect
adventures
to
Statute,
establish
tend
the
of
)
Irish
Council
supremacy
Cabinet.
George
every
Privy
the
1165
legislative
Ireland.
reduced
the
of
British
to
law
the
fact
over
Parliament
Poynings’ the
in
MARX
that
of
III and
America.
vicious
his
cost
by
precedent
British
This
Ireland
Parliament
them
the
every
Statute
which
to
had
attempt
North-American
colonies.
CENERAL
IN
THE
CHARACTER
EIGHTEENTH
Protestant
THE
OF
the
Parliament
of
the
Conquerors.
in
to
the
British
themselves
Irish
people.
rigorously
were
As
more
The by
carried
from
Parliament
ruining
on
by
mere
Irish the
the
UPHEAVING
electors. instrument,
They Catholic
against
Code
Only
that
A
Government.
against
Penal
legislature
principally the
despotism
enforced.
made
mercial of
by
THE
Protestants
Only
serf
relation
UNTIL
CENTURY
Parliament.
PARLIAMENT
IRISH
In
fact
a mere
compensated
mass
of
the
Catholics!67 was time some efforts the English comand commerce, then Scotch-English part
the time to to resist
industry
Protestant,
population.
to will
the internal be said by and
composition by.
of
this
Parhament
etc.
I R E LA ND
new
A
state
Independence
things
of
and
the
B)
*
RELAXATION
proclaimed
War
6
1778: of
the
of
American
to
support
Catholics,
a
Irish,
who
relaxation
1778: Penal
CATHOLICS
of
Independence
the
Constitution
France,
was
Republic the
Americans,
by
which
the
recognised
and
until
had
by
the
they
under
the
the
long
Penal
time
side
had
States
of
in
moved
Code
from
United
other
events
American
Presbyterians
on
a
the
Insh
to
was
“What
take
stitution
which
brethren
shared
gratitude to relapse
to
In
united
the
vain again
in
Ulster, banners
Atlantic.
supplicated in
1776,
in
had the
been danger
manuscript
marked
“‘A”’
lost
severity
obliterated,
of
the
Catholics
(1792,
in
even
of
of
by
the
a
debate
partial
on
union
Catholic
with
two bodies restored their separation.... Your the
that
your con-
Catholic
of the conflict, but you had not justice or the fruits of the victory. You suffered them imsignificance and depression. And, let me
this and
were
the
of land.
efforts
let them share into their former
the is
leases
consequence
the
relaxed
features
afterwards
The
countrymen?
Parliament
worst
its
Code,
Curran said Emancipation):
*
priar
AGAINST
with
mainly
for
of
the
allowed
section
War
tones.
louder
were
CODE
produced
to America, enrol against England
The
England.
English.
emigrate
fight
of
Amenca.
the
Many
and
War
Republic.
and
Ireland.
for
American Ireland
Treaties
fermentation
Great
upon
proclaims
American
promised
rid
PENAL
England
February,
France
on
American
Independence
Congress
the
of
between
independence
got
THE
the
States) Declaration Congress, 4 July, 1776.
1777:
(American)
the
of
Legislative
OF
with
171
1801
OF
(United by
April
Effects
UNI ON
TO
it brought
Independence
to
American
opened
disasters
First
of
A)
ON R EV O LUT I
A M ERI CA N
F RO M
section the
is
following
marked
II, though
“‘C’’.—-Ed.
the
preceding
172
KARL
ask
you,
ask
you
if
feet
of
the
has
not fared Parliament
it
the
British
Parliament?
you
of
Ireland
Minister,
can at
than
boast
that
your
to
according
deserts?
now
being
of
period
was
it
Let
me
at
the
less the
of
British
”’
you
“But
with
MARX
to
affect
think
your
property
in
danger,
by
admitting
them into the state.... Thirteen years ago you expressed the same fears, yet you made the experiment; you opened the door to landed property, and the fact has shown the fear to be without foundation.”+68 Then
on
Protestant
testant
Ascendancy.169 in
Church
The
main
measure
on
the
Minister
and
their
b)THE
part
of absentees.
the
for
or
4
as
supplicated
In
was
etc.
sidered
by
This
the
steady
were
Commons,
Pro-
the
seen.
have]
the In
of
every
had
to in
the
both
MOVEMENT.
Penal
proclaimed
their
year
Irish
same
the
demanded
the
division
of
Lords,
ENGLAND
Americans In
the
transferred
FREE-TRADE
OF
useful
adherents in
THE
CONCESSIONS
and
proxies
ORGANISATION.
a
relaxation
1777
proclaimed.
vances
Their
at
[we for)
April
Always
being.
Independence.
of
Catholics,
the
1776
July,
Declaration
the
of
innovation
and
FIRST
On
property
the
im a letter, phalanx.
card formed
VOLUNTEER
time in
influence
a
and
every
to
opposition
the
Minister on Houses they
Tithes
Ireland.
(they
the had
before
redress.
Code,
Constitution of the American Republic 1778 first redress of the Catholic grie-
enabled
English
the
as
their
/rish
Protestants,
gaolers
and
till
bailiffs,
now to
con-
move.
To understand the movement from 1779-1782 (Legislatwe Independence) it becomes necessary briefly to allude to the state in which England found herself. In June 1778 commenced the war between England and France. In 1780 France sent not only, as she Had done till then, money subsidies and men-of-war to America, but also an auxiliary army. (6,000 men under the Marquis of Rochambeau.) The French army landed on 10 July, 1780 in Rhode Island, surrendered to him by the English. In September 1780 the English colonel Ferguson was defeated in the West of North Carolina. 19 October, 1781, Cornwallis (General) included
by
Washington
in
York
Town
(Virginia)
had
to
IRELAND
FROM
capitulate.
AMERICAN
REVOLUTION
men,
(5-6,000
many
TO
UNION
English
1801
OF
173
were
etc.
men-of-war
captured. )
27
1778,
July,
sea-battle
Summer 1779: United States and
one.
The
and
only
the
saved
1780
In much
26
and
and
5
August,
His
not
1779. invasion
great
A
part
testantism
of
have
supposed,
associations,
self-raised
of
the
*
this
the
history
Charles
of
the
destruc-
the
sea,
but
neutral
lost
maritime
it will this
III.—Ed.
was
the
the
be
and
Peace
Treaty
navy
consist-
French
English
coast
Spanish
navy.
and
Volunteers—the
partly
for In
less
the
island
armed
defence time
commencement of
an
ungarnsoned,
left
threatened,
united
surface
patriot
Undecided.
Sea.
army
English
/1!—arose, from
of
place,
June,
OX
Ireland
from than
these
of
was
Pro-
the
could armed
covered
with
soldiers.
x
At
in
from
Preliminary
self-vindication.
whole
host
French Spanish
all
North
France
by
for
the
the
the
of
by
Ireland!
partly
been
the and
on
invites
*
circumstances
foreigner,
a
to
ally
England.
1779
In
menaced
these
French
1779)
at Paris
and
Ireland
of
(Plymouth) Under
as
coast
English the
defeated
in
1782,
States
Inshmen.
of
at
Neutrality.1/9 England pounces upon 1782, naval battle between the English
*
ed
English
ships.
Russia
at Doggersbank,
United
the
amongst (August
was
30 November,
between
Spazin* accedes navy united with
mercantile
1780,
Armed
Dutch, On
and
arsenals.
England
to
Holland. and
French
of
assailed
fleets
February,
powers
France.
Plymouth
money
in
King
dissension
its wharfs
of
The
hostile
Admirals tion
between
Undecided.
Quessant.
*
*
interesting
Volunteer
force,
to
anticipate because,
the in
whole
fact,
it
ts
174
KARL
the
history
the
one
tional merely
to
Ireland
of
hand, the movement, national
character
1800,
1.e.
the
merged
on
the
and
constitu-
stripped
a
into
other
its
off
truly
revolu-
the
British
hand,
secret
intrigue for brutal force intended succeeding in bringing about the Union
annihilation
an
mto
transformation
them,
on
1795,
since
national
by
and
and,
Government changed to bring about, and of
when,
popular,
represented
movement,
tionary
moment
the
general
MARX
out
as a
Ireland
of
way
nation,
country
of
the
Volunteer
and
its
district
of
England.
are
There
four
I Period.
of
the
1779
to
1783:
From
Volunteers, vital
periods
the
elements
armed
labourers.
farmers,
Their
commercial
and
Jealousy
England
of
Emancipation
as one
tion!
Their
give
official.
new
them of
the The
Irish.
as
a
bodies
as
(minority)
element
and the
of
the
of
the
popular
French
to
the
Revolution
power
their
in
Rotunda, treason of
Irish
House
them
(October) from without
of
Commons,
national of
reactionary element
pushes
of
victory. exalt them.
The
the
ones)
own
Reform.
by
the
of
into
the
upon the and as armed
Irish
1791
House House
(commercial
of
ruin,
Whig,
Dublin
and
force
thcir
of
in the
them
of
pressure
especially
support
popular
The
1783
From
germ
England
of
aristocratic
apogee
The
assembled
Parliamentary their
Catholic Resurrec-
claim as their Irish Commons
them.
disavowal
important
Parliament,
drew,
the
breaks
II Period.
in
National
and
disasters
the
bigot,
victories
first
delegates for
and
chief
Commons background.
tee.
enroll
their
Convention
Still
also
week,
they justly thanks by the
of
when
their
The
lay
the
mercantile
National
of
the
from
Then
Parliament
and
Commons
votes
1783,
but
a
to
them
them.
all
merchants,
mere
the
conditions
organisation
Charlemont.
Catholic
the
embrace
emancipation
around
of
the
of
strength,
subordinating
Earl
thrown
Reform
Ireland,
which
the
formation
gentlemen,
object,
fetters
had
Then
first
of
noblemen,
first
industrial
Independence.
its
Protestantism
all classes,
of
In
movement.
and
reforming
Opposition
The
aristocratic
Commons.
part
of
and
the
middle-class
with-
prevailing. (1789)
finds
both
the
Catholic
Commit-
FR O M
I RELA ND
(principally
composed
and the
Club172
Whig
ON R EV O L UT I
A M ERI CAN
of
ON UN I
TO
175
18 0 1
OF
noblemen)
Catholic
(Reformers) and
feeble
dispirited.
was
There
the
strength A
a
In
stamp,
his
of And
in
testant
Party,
tion
which
the
French
of
the
Union*
in
the
of
In
wrongs with
the
Now
called:
and
or
a
argument and
in
failing
wrote
received
half
pack
of
restore
Catholics,
he
“An
Whig,”
corrup-
a
and
of
Regency
to push
wife
these,
republic.
Northern
a
of
think
the
coach-maker
half
with
to
Pro-
to
them,
zn on behalf of every mark pamphlet
clients.
1791,
October,
a
by
new
ever.
a
headed
by
began
than
and
dread.
soon
began fearful
aman,
emancipation,
his
from
of
Lords
merchant,
etc.,
harder
and
Commons,
Ireland,
of
Catholics
gratitude
and
Catholic
slavish
Revolution, of
the
independent
Catholic
but
barrister,
redress
the
an
country
his
son
the
briefless
to
resolved
representation
of
Tone,
and
in
McCracken
rendered
by
Wolfe
or
sagacious
flying
Reform,
desperate
children,
the
Russel,
principles
poor
orgqnisation,
orators
rough,
nobles
the
a
favour
a strong, Catholic
advocated government
The
Theobald
make
the
and
and
farmer,
from
Neilson,
Belfast,
Volunteer
1790. Whig Club
until
public.
Keogh,
sent
Republicanism.
dispute,
the
the
of
Party
men
of
to act on Dublin, John
began
men
decline
Liberal
race
different
now
steady
the
of
in
he
Belfast
the
first
United
of
the
Volunteers
founded
Irish
Society.
From
merges
this
into
moment, that of the
tion
became that longer to remove middle
vast
classes,
part
matter,
II recall
* The
people.
The
the
question political
The
The the
from
emancipate
French
was
upper
Catholic
peasant,
Irish
became
social
as
principles,
ques-
Catholic
question
to
no and
for
the
as
to
its
form,
its
national.
1791
From
Fitzwilliam.
movement
the
of
to
(October)
1795
(After
the
that
the
) Volunteers
merged
into
of
Irishmen.
Probably
a
Speeches
John
principles
to
Catholic.
of Lord
The
Irish
disabilities
but
Period.
United
the
of
assumed
remained
movement United Irishmen. the
of
slip
of
the
Davies
disunion”’.—Ed.
pen;
in
writes:
his
introduction
“to
push
to
Curran’s
corruption
and
book the
176
. ,, . , un t il
Pu blic
,
t he go v e mmen t meas ures t o t he num bers in i ncrease d I ri s hmen Uni t ed t h e ir t ore t o res b egan unteer C orps and t h e V ol
T he
d ence in conf i t h e ir disc ip line v e and impro
i cs Ca t ho l
arra y
MARX
by
f orce d
w hen
1794
secre t
b ec ome
KARL
o f t heir ac t ion:
A cme 15
1793:
February,
resolutions
in
permanent
A
favour
Volunteer
The
Committee.
Bill
Relief
at
Convention
Emancipation
of
and
and
was
1793
Apri
of
Dungannon,
Reform,
passed
a
named
carried
by
this
pressure.
But now, the movement; pitched into
the
Secret
tocratic
and
laws
Alten
Act—the
vention
Militia,
Acts,
Parliament,
The recall
in
had
United
IV
retum
this
high
first
provincial
and
Dublin
were
prohibited
by
mto
calmness
and
be gaining assumed a
a
Acts
were
statute
The
by
organisation.
The
force.
merged
into
the
under
assisted they
Volunteer Parliament
Armed
North
First
this
against
cry first. arms im
forwarding
themselves patriotism
at (Ulster)
Associations,
in the
bearing in
the Irish
of the
Protestants. from
their
relaxation
same
to
of
strongest
rallied
which and
the
development the
zealously
passed
1795.
Only
farmers
they
associations
friends,
local,
the Con-
Bill.
decision
pression.
(Leinster).
Protestant
Their
popular
and
sion.
However,
the and
whole
and and
Movement
since
to
the
1793,
Gunpowder
a secret
the
arts-
the
and
March,
was
Relief
became
Volunteer
1779-83,
11
coercion
of
Catholic
left
movement
now
We
the
only
The
revolutionary
Movement,
code
full
(merging
yeomen.
drilling,
on
passed
the
from
Irishmen)
Correspondence,
Irishmen
Period.
under
a
passed
Fitzwilliam
of
United
societies,
were
secede
Volunteers
middle-class
military
Foreign
fact,
that
the
of
Volunteers
classes
ci-devant
bigottedly
against
the
of
the
Societies
stupidly,
Coercive
machinery
higher
Catholic against
had
no
gained
Inva-
Catholics
Ireland.
those
very
admission. them
many
intolerance appeared rapidly to was not until the Volunteers had
of
ground, but it deliberative capacity,
that
the
necessity
of uniting
IRELAND
FROM
object
first
against
of
invasion—was
an
industrially, the
REVOLUTION
TO
UNION
population of the country became distinctly obvious.
the whole pendency The
AMERICAN
Insh
Volunteers—after
to
free
themselves
then
almost
although
by
observed,
legislate
had,
in
and
the
that
Ireland,
by
the
dissimulation
fact,
for
its
very
interfere
with
the
and
hands
a
nature
ment
the
of
was
Parliament,
a
quence
the
of
national
concerns
altogether
might
The
might
be
hence
Council;
suppressed
the
determined
they
manageher own
the
Ireland,
by
Great
Britain,
be
the
might
unless
conse-
probable
legislative encouragement. spirit; the measures of the by an act of the Privy
successful industry and peers [showed] no public
of
Commons
commerce
as
far
have
supporters,
its
because
to
immaterial
rivalship
might
of her
so
of
authonty
of
it of
restraint
England;
of
local
commercial
ingenuity
manufactures,
interests
merely
assumption colouring
or
object
of her
the
British
whatever
real
suppression
where
this
for
received
co-operation
the
of
whole
necessary.
people
moment
The the
(the
instances
suspended,
ists
of
the
Irish
[the
in
the
armed
she
had
that]
fact
others
prohibited,
inundated
own;
a
to destroy
England
force
the
Irish
combination
Irish
the
of
by
manufacture
in some exporta-
the
markets
with
great capitalinundation of
market.
Hence
the
Insh
non-consumption by excluding not
any measure
British
it
quicker
of
flew
and
her
of
and
favourable.
manufactures,
species
England
of
notwithstanding
of Insh
every
distress
was
Volunteers)
England, tion
defence
r was
It
of
the
in
interest.
to
inde-
of
mercantilely
wholly
its
177
cause
the
the
interest
Protestants,
in
1801
OF
agreement only
than
the
the
every
soldier.
Self-formed,
Crown,
no
independent connexion
their
own
non-importation
throughout in
the but
Ireland.
than
wind
Volunteer
a
adopt
zmportation,
proposed,
almost
appointed
the
manufacture
publicly
Meanwhile
to
resolved
throughout
no
self-governed,
whatever officers
with
etc.
sooner
was
universally
organisation Protestant
whole kngdom, consumption
the
No
was
it
the
enrolled
whole at
as
commissions the
this
adopted;
nation.
spread;
Yet
and
length
a
patriot from
Government,
subordination
the they
was
178
KARL
complete. but
the
an
had
required not
it
did
arms in
Important ranks.
these
House
the
head
occasion;
the
Irish
Robert
Sir
beseech
but
Your
we
are
who
became
etc.
noblemen
1779-80.
Deane,
all
of
a
After
)* in the moved in moved
Grattan
of
our
of
Your
Irish
trade,
country
Mr.
Majesty’s
subjects
Hussey
Attorney
Burgh, moved
General) it
‘That
not
is
by
movement. in
confidence
Although attention
was
state
of
that
with
his
usual
Lord
even called
country,
the
on
is
open
the
present
and
calamity,
our
and
with
the
the
un-
that
the
manufacturers
are
hopeless wretchedness; trade of this miserable
a
export
free
trade,
and
birthright.”
Prime following
Sergeant (above amendment:
expedients,
that
this
nation
the now
is
to
74
nghtly
It greatly
this
increased
success
unexpected
both
the
numbers
and
associations.
in
both
to
Houses
the
Lord
Irish North
superciliousness
Buckingham
it
you
such
hand with the expiring
the
rmuin.”!
Volunteer
in
the
Unanimously carried. The Volunteers attributed
to their
decayed,
that
absentees,
caused
is to natural
temporary
impending
from
their
supply
have
has
dominions,
enjoy
to
drain
our
of
to believe, to approach
Majesty
constrained
constant
the
support
your
*
20,000
association
familiar
Parliament
dying for want: famine stalks hand and the only means left to support
Ed.
corps
and,
men
Americans
the Lord Lieutenant (Harcourt? and the usual adulatory address
prohibition
saved
demand;
of
reluctance
fortunate
be
their
the the
of
the
Government;
refuse
against
States
movement
by
we
‘That
part let
the
by
amendment:
following
natural
At
the
of
Commons
utmost
rendered supply
sufficient
circumstances:
speech of Lords,
frivolous
the
United
this
Sessions
themselves;
eye, handed out to the Volunteers from the Castle of Dublin.!’3 Many
the
in
to
safe
by
numbers
to
think
sergeants.
drill
Under
their
of
they
served
their
increase
procure a arms from
averted
of
provided
first
unable
Government
with
at
length
purchase;
stands
were
extraordinary
at
them
arms
Their
MARX
was
Lord
and
of
the
distress
and
treated
the
frivolity.
Lieutenant
British
of
Parliament
the
dangerous
whole
Nothing Ireland
at
[matter]
was
done.
the
time.—
IRELAND
FROM
The
AMERICAN
REVOLUTION
non-importation
now
became
general
and
in
TO
UNION
1801
OF
movement
non-consumption
Ireland.
At
a
length,
179
general
meeting
was
convened by the High Shenff of the city of Dublin, and resolutions then entered into by the whole metropolis, which finally
at
and
length
longer
to to
resolved
William,
Duke
measure of every
of
rank
seduce
the
popular
[their their
for
Volunteers
to
society.
Secret
of
soldier
his
from
officers
Ireland ‘These The
resolutions
Volunteers
organisation],
the
of
or
command
chose
was the first army composed
regular
efforts
of
This
Chief.
a
form officers,
the
from
that
strictness.
consolidate
measure, would no
judicious
domination.
and
Leinster,
of
the
and
vigour
that
Britain,
Great
msult
with
enforced
Dublin
consummated
convinced
submit
were
and
confirmed
to
detach
the
of
to most
Government
the
in
soldiers—all
vain! The mand of of
appointment of the Duke the Dublin Volunteers, was
other
cial
district
generals;
was
regularly
armies
appointed
the
the
armies
other
Provincial
Earl
[was
now
Affairs
commerce
the
people,
trade’ of
the
was
the
Nation;
the
parade,
commanded
the mouths tton.”’ Lord
of
adopted;
December,
1781.
and
army
commander-in-chief,
in
their
organisation.
everything
movement.
provin-
four
Ulster
a
Soon
assumed General
the Com-
the first
most
object
watchword Dublin by
their
the
freedom
the
ideas
solicitude.
Artillery
Napper
repealing
Now all
“Free
the
to
Volunteers,
Volunteer
cannon:
crisis;
familiar
of of
James
a
towards
fast
subject
Tandy,
these the
Acts
Trade
“‘A
and
free
the
appeared with
of
labels
cry on on
or
Speedy RevoluNorth got now frightened. America was already lost. On 24th November, 1781, a speech from the throne wherein he [the king] called the immediate attention of his British Parlament to the situation of Ireland. Now in hot haste these blockheads acceded to the Irish claims. The British Parliament met on the 25 November, and the first Bills of concessions received the royal assent on the 21 distinctly
their
its
of
The
that
appointed}.
the
became
with.
rapidly
approached
being
organisation
Charlemont
were
mander-in-Chief
of
of
systematic
of
the
proceeded
proceeded
reviews
appearance
and
com-
Leinster to the quickly followed by of
dunderheads which
their
passed predecessors
Bills, had
180
KARL
declared
absolutely
England
the
from
were
Messages the
of
hberality
North
the then
thus
endeavouring
at
which, and
wear
to
length
“Free
was
fuss
Britain.
made
Meanwhile
1782,
by
continuing
from
time
to time, country,
in
favour
the
that
of
to
now and
session.
the
duplicity
to
purported
the
of
extend
proceed-
to
benefits
paramount authority of Great Bniits acts of concession into declaratory supremacy. Fourteen Irish Counties at
the
to
the
fortunes,
Irish.
much
Great
of
year
perceived
own
its
of
the
of
prosperity
affairs
out
they
the
Ireland, of
resolution
while
avowed
to
over the on Irish
converted
Statutes
of
justice
asserted
Ireland?!,
once
and
a
passing
Ireland
tain,
over
Committee
and
industry
sent
pass
to
tried
open
ings
dangerous
secure
to
essential
MARX
at
establish,
independence
was
Trade’
the
the
of
now
risk
their
of
Irish
lives
Legislature.
accompanied
with
and
cry
The
that
“‘Free
ofa
Parliament”.
pass
The with
Army
British
loyalty
fidelity
Ireland,
corporate
the
into
by
body,
those
been
army,
as
an
regulations
of
people.
under
the
revenue
became
every
almost
that
enacted
or the aware
authority
they
the
of
by
the
the
Judges
control
Crown,
no
King,
the
army Parlia-
Resolutions
corps,
and
every
obey
any
laws,
longer
Lords
its
of
this.
of
military
would
to
speech),
perpetual mutiny bill,1}’5 enabled to command at all times a standing
Volunteers
entered
the
of
hereditary
the
(in his
Volunteer
had
without
The
the
Ireland
a
of
and
throne
and
Government
ment.
save
on
in
aid
the
from
eulogiums
Statute,
the
were
the
of
British
in
forced,
unqualified
expression
a
was
III
George
and
of
Commons
Ireland. The
salaries
to
sufficient offices
remove at
his
people, The
years,
only
keep during
at
them control. the
the
pleasure:
all
Irish
justice,
questions
between
purity
of
the
was
Parliament,
superintendence Council
his
the
then
them above want, and they the will of the British Minister, all
in
were
Ireland
of
In
Irish
and
of
judge
at
this
Attorney
their
proceedings
of
alteration
and
met
rejection
General
and of
their
held who
their might
therefore, Crown
consequently
period,
British
the
barely
but
was
in the
and
was the
suspected.
once
in
vested British
Statutes.
two the Privy
IRELAND
9
FROM
AMERICAN
1781.
OCTOBER,
opened,
speech
of
the
(House
of
Mr.
O’Nedl
the
Volunteers
Ireland,
corps
within
This
be
the
supremacy
tion
and
the
of
of
of
UNION
and
be
the
down
Volunteers,
to
“‘all
It
was
to
the
continuance’’.
circulated
sheriffs
the
and
Britain,
self-armed,
passed,
throughout
the
of
all
counties
r
brought
of
Parliament
to His Majesty resolution of thanks
a
to by
181
Irish
Commons.
exertions
directed
1801
OF
address
bailiwicks.
resolution
feet
their
for
communicated
their
the
House
etc., after Commons) moved
voted, to
and
Irish
TO
Viceroy
Ireland,
of
unanimously
REVOLUTION
raised
a
by
British the
direct
Volunteers
Parliamentary
and
self-governed,
to
Government
above approbaassocia-
self-disciplined
tions.
These whole
Volunteers
regular
Portugal Ireland
been
to
factures
improve
Ministers) happened
The
liberty
statutes.
she Irish
Portuguese
all her
enemies.”
The
House
Now
the
nection
almost
British
had
been
previously tried
manufacturers
(under
motion calling that
orders
to
exclusive
to
British
merchandise the Irish
Fitzgibbon, the King
kingdom,
“by
Sir
as
(this House
Luctius King of
hostility
with
(Ireland)
and
in only
the
to pass it. country, that
has
astonish
courage
the
was
the
to
upon
of
explicitly
of
not that Nation maintain all her rights,
heard]
England the
a
and
immediately
doubt
“We
have
[was
Legislature,
This
federatwe.
consideration
of
the
con-
their
engrossed
armed
associa-
Ireland.
of
protection
of
Corpus
Repeal
of
Volunteers
and
the Engltsh corporate
meetings
a
in
February,
1782,
Grievances.
Statute bodies
personal
liberty
in
Ireland:
No
general agreed
the
armed
delegates assembly.
upon
of 6, George I asked by the armed etc. Catholic bodies now also entered by
officered
of
appointed
first
province,
for
Act.17?
army,
Volunteer
deliberative Ulster
not
did
the
Emprre. the
of
Ministry
sufficient
cry
with
Want
of
with:
resources
and
the
British
number
export her linen and woollen manuto the provistons of the Treaty of
agreeable
concluding
vigour
Habeas
the
in
peremptorily refused, and seized the Irish in 1782). Petition of the Dublin merchants
Portugal’?
tions
exceeded
resolutions
to
of Commons. In opposition to O’Brien moved an amendment, Ireland, to assert the rights of
now
time
of
the
which
express
this.
force
By
from
by
this
admitted
ePortugal,
Methuen,1"®
prohibited
military
Affatr:
had
by
the
Protestants.
Volunteers. to The
declare
Regular
The the
Convention
celebrated
and
armed
sentiments
at
Declaration
public
associations of
their
Dungannon,
15
Rights
and
of
182
KARL
were
They voice
AT
propriety
million
THE
DECLARATION
it
has
citizen,
by
or
learning
a
That
that
the
delay
be
no
prevail;
decided
ances
.
may
in
unalterable
redress,
as
our
prosperity Four
members
to
appointed
meetings
their
of
with
all
may
think
proper
on
Earl
Protestant declared
the
for
every
we
with
the
of
where
country
the
province.
That
a
come
Derry
Volunteers
Volunteer
said
our
is
griev-
as
Irishmen, the
of
we
that
to
penal
conceive the
union
in
for
in
the
carrying by
George full
Ireland
and
them
birth,
Robert
call nine
commun-
to
provinces,
that
deliberate
with
into
effect.
British
Peer
Fitzgerald)
and
openly
Emancipation).
Catholic
the
to
to
and appoint
order
other
were
Ulster
of
Corps,
committee
Dublin,
of
of
(ditto
as
province
resolutions;
means
of
and
should it
these
relaxation
the
Englishman
Corps
should
of
and
Volunteer
the in
similar
(uncle
refusal
there that
redress
the
impartial
the
union
consequences
Associations
an
a
as men,
of
the
committee
to
where
grievance;
seek in
the
a
and
Ireland.”’ for
be
a
civtl
Kingdoms,
that
perfect
a
happiest
committee
of
distinction
rejoice
to
and
fellow-subjects;
Catholic
Bristol,
Bishop
a
that
Volunteer
his
of
both
of
essential
England;
and
effectual;
each
any
the
that
unconstitutional
in
and
constitutional
of
equally
as
a
to
most
the
The
other
is
makes
inhabitants
to
members
icate
is
to
from
as
act
or
subjects,
abandon
Council
determination
fraught
the
with
unanimously:
Privy
jealousy
Protestants,
be
of
not
cannot
such,
political
Poynings,
Ireland,
excite
Roman
to
on
unconstitutional
itself
speedy
and
of
Ireland,
as
men, other than the King, Lords, to bind thts Kingdom, is uncon-
judges
of
in
the
laws the
law
by
1782
FEBRUARY,
resolved
does
of
by
the
to
right
and
measure
In
body
is
and
them
any
and
the
of
of
of
15
Volunteers,
men,
arms,
exercised
distinction;
against
general
of
of justice
this
Christians,
laws
use
backed
VOLUNTEERS
opinions
public
independence
of
that
their
or
the
pretence
administration
or
asserted
Ireland, to make and a grievance;
power
the
under the grievance;
THE
OF
soldiers,
country.
that
of
CONVENTION,
give
claim
and Commons of Stitutional, tllegal, that
been
Parliament,
of
Ulster
inhabitants
DUNGANNON
debate
conduct
25,000
from
one
THE
“Whereas
rights.
delegates
about
of
MARX
Dungannon
resolutions
are
received
the
accepted. About
As
this
soon
time
as
concurrence Commons
people whole
of
the the
assumed
without House
about
now
appeared
90,000
Volunteers
Dungannon
associations,
a new
aspect.
on
forming
ready.
Volunteers
armed
told
are
their into
The
had the
Jrish
House
proceedings
representatives parties.
of
within.
of
the The
IRELAND
FROM
AMERICAN
.
, ,, biennia l
w ere
S ess i o ns
T he i r
REVOLUTION
TO
UNION
1801
OF
183
t h e ir
c onseq u ent ly
and
gra n t s t o G o v ernme nt w ere f or t w o y ears a t once ; and t ill more mo ne y w as req uire d t h e ir le g is la t iv e [po w er ] w as inac t iv e T hey no w d e t erm ine d on grant ing s upp lies t o t he C ro w n f o r 6 mon t h s on l y asa hint t ha t t he y w o u ld grant no es more t ill t he ir grie v anc w ere re d resse d ; t his h a d it s e f f ec t T he proc ee d i ngs o f t h e V o lu n t eers and m u n ic ipa l b o d ies b ec a m e e v ery d a y more serio us a nd d ec is iv e t he t one in t he H o u se o f C ommo ns more me na c i ng t i ca bl e It w as i mpra c t o proc ee d w it h L or d N or t h an y longer A b o ut A pril 178 2 t h e M a rq u is o f R oc k ing ha m ’ s ne t (J ames Fo x Cab i e t c ) [w a s f orme d ] T he D uk e of
.
, . ., ,. . , ,. , , .
P ort l and
nom i na t e d
i n D ub l
14
on t h e
16 t h
A pr il
he
178 2
Declarations
of
M ess a ge o f G eorge ng : 178 2 St ati mistrusts
“that
and to
necessary to... a final
order
The
to
mee t
arriv e d
I re land
t he
at
a ment P a rl i
I r is h
Irish
take
the
independence
of
t h e B rit is h P a r liamen t
III t o
jealousies
legislative
had
arisen
same
into
in
Ireland,
and
immediate
18 A pril
that
was
it
consideration,
in
adjustment.”
British
entire
“their
ha d
of
A pr il
C)
highly
Li e u t e na n t
L o rd
House
and
concurrence
cheerful
express
in reply:
of Commons in
His
Majesty’s
views
a
final
by
the
of
adjustment”.
same
The Irish
Ministry,
ment
zn
The
to
House
of
that
was
were
repeated,
to the
proposed
Irish
16
of
motion,
1782:
when
Grattan
Mr.
Hely
on
the
weight
into
their
had
to
concerned
amongst
point
Hutchinson
and said, the Lord Lieutenant from the King, importing that
great
same
April,
rose
Majesty, being were prevailing
“His
to procrastinate. Grattan impossible without provoking
wanted
was
this
Commons,
Independence
the
Union
Portland
of
him,
jealousies take
a
adjustment”
Parlia-
1800.
State in Ireland) deliver a message
matters
“final
when
Duke
icated the
words
his
find that loyal subjects
and importance, recommended most serious consideration, in
of
communanarchy. proposing
of
(Secretary
ordered discontents of Ireland, the order
him
to and
upon
House to to effect
184
KARL
such
a final adjustment as might give satisfaction to both kingdoms.” Hutchinson accompanied this message, and his statement of his on
views
the same time, that therefore silent to all
at
simply to deliver the message; he was and pledged the Government to none.
he had details
Ponsonby proposed a short address. Grattan spoke: “America has shed America Is to be free: Ireland has shed her
to
is Ireland Ponsonby’s subjects
of
crown,
but
men and
of
people,
free
connected
English blood
blood,
and
England,
for
very
the
all
the
sort
His
essence
of
people
any
whatever
assure
to
nor
Ireland,
of
any
of
Ireland;
that
the
Crown
of
Ireland
with
the
Crown
of
Great
our
do
which
we as
claim
only
humbly
a
exists,
Ponsonby
the
is
Ireland, object
to do utmost
wished
use on
would
his which
(1799.
birth-right,
on
and
in the
which
most
he
“that
authority
that
we,
which
stated
he
this
in
his
influence
in
obtaining
had
resolutions unanimous their
openly
shortly
on
part
of
firmness
was
matters
resolved
should
verging,
for
defending
life
and
fortune
(This
true
he
their into
man
not
common the
of
scale.”’
the
that
we
willingand of
(Portland) Ireland,
an
a
an
rights
.
in
never
had
final.)
scene
very It
Corps.
not
the
decided
was
abstract
the
virtue
revolution.
patriot;
and
Clonmel,
insignificant
had
Pitt-Castlereagh
Mr.
even
to lord
executing
extremity he
as
1782
determined
villain
he
passed.
this
Lord
were the
be
1799
and
[himself]
to
of
Volunteer
afterwards
proceed should
the
achieved
of Great Britain not to be their
“he
this
after
people,
declared
General,
Parliament
if
which
had
Attorney
the
of
and réghts
in
was
Motion
Grattan’s
the
in
England
of
and
delegates,
he
avowed
concession
etc.” the
this part
heart.”
before
Fitzgibbon then
his
fixed
Unanimously
Shortly
power
everything
Portland
considered
were
an
Britain
ly consented [on behalf of Portland] to the proposed amendment, would answer that the noble lord who presided in the Government
the
to his
Parliament
conceive
right
their
any
hath
save
country,
this
that
liberty
Ireland,
of
Parliament
in
Majesty
cannot yield but with our lives.”’ Brownlow seconded. George
of
and
that the Kingdom of Ireland is a distinct kingdom, with a Parliaof her own the sole legislature thereof, that there is no body of competent to make laws to bind the Nation but the King, Lords,
or power right
a
inseparably
Commons
of
are
Ireland
much
own
proposes an Amendment assure His Majesty that
in fetters?”’ etc. He address’, etc. “to
remain “‘short
imperial
ment
own
subject, with a determination to support a declaration of and constitutional “independence’’. Hutchinson declared
the rights”
“Irish
.
MARX
to
Scott, “If
over
it
Ireland, tyranny. That
he
feared they to the fund to throw his
their
which
John declared:
subscriber
determined
school!)
IRELAND
FROM
AMERICAN
on
Immediately
one
England, and
cultivating
entirely
his
tone
siderable The
to
to
the
was
Parliament
effectives.
Besides
very
many
simulation} 27
On
of
omit
.
Portland late
were
124,000,
!/3
he
whom
of
the
whole
1782
a
of
receive
1782
in
his
are
in
your
the
Insh
quasi
speech
a
to
Throne....
the
most
His
from to
in
desire
to
acts
met
have
Commons
the
throne:
give
con-
the
of
the
with
to
the
in
this
laid
the
unqualified,
consummate
of dis-
the
His
not
.
the
that
she
Majesty
of
Great
Britain,
and
part
further
to the
you
of
Great
wish
give
conme in
his
Privy
Royal
term
and
two
of
the
by
the
surest
the
of
years. The any stipula-
generosity,
them
of
Council
to limit Accommodation
and
to
is
and
the
pledge
a
of
etc.”’
up
every
that
she
should
usurped
formerly
our
faith,
afford
you,
reception
be most given it
unaccompanied
given
idea
unfeigned
magnanimity
unconditional
wisdom
had
had
of
as may
in
obedience
anxious
in
British
once:
at
least
the
in
before
anywhere,
to
Good
on your
Britain
Great
had
The
nation,
rose
fool
.
Majesty
English)
Bills
of
Regulation
Kingdom,
and
to
expressed
Legislative
most
them
of
better
whatever.
disposition,
Government
Parliament
Irish,
pursuant
cordial
disposition
suppression
His
of
(the
declaration
assure
tissue
met,
the
from
gracious
alteration
for
this
as he
the
intentions
Grattan “That
the
Act
corresponding
Ireland,
then
“‘King
be
of
and
first
his
of
forces
condition of
you
and
Maesty’s
or
100,000
of
was
every wish papers which,
testimony
whose
to prevent
Kingdom,
honour
and
to
most
the
army
of
directed
convincing
Majesty
assure
to
benevolent
to
had
of
appeared and
gratify
By
I have
representations
but
duration
any
who
premeditated
House
united
commands,
the
command
tion
opportunity
upwards
English
exercise his Royal Prerogative in such a manner ducive to the welfare of his faithful subjects, has
His
necessity
no
Irish
conduct
Address
Britain,
this
the
for three weeks, to wait Independence. Meanwhile unremitting vigour by the
prorogued
Declaration of continued with
about
satlors
Majesty’s
assent
other,
Administration,
whom
to private
despatches
Charlemont,
his
over
bodies
their
nearly
May,
Parliament
which
Earl in
for
would
185
)
adjournment.
will
the
meanwhile
now
(Portland’s
His
“he
confidence
armed
King’s Reply to and discipline
army,
to
with
place
two the
reasons
the
that
1801
OF
sent off document,
explained
connexion
Volunteer
your
He
conclusion
UNION
influence”’.
for the reviews
ditto
Fox.
in
disposed
a proper
turn, Portland Cabinet as a public
to
Stated
TO
this
the
confidential,
acceding.... of
to
REVOLUTION
of
that
repeal
justice”’
of
be
also
that
affection
to
His
Majesty,
and
we
conceive
the
the
6,
to
claim
George
authority
over
to
make
bound
power.
I
His
Royal
the
move
wisdom
of
the
for
an
a measure
of
resolution
I, to
be
you
Person
186
KARL
and
similar
talk,
no
“that longer Sir
constitutional
“I
repeat
own be
it,
that
bind
two
the
nations
any
wil
and
declared
an
that
English
“the
Irish Ditto
statute”.
unequivocally,
no right, power of
an
by
have
Act
to
instance,
English
we
relinquished....
any
in
of
make
Legislation
never
power
assert
the
to
was
the Irish purchase
and
into
fear.
it
to
enact
the
prepared
precipitancy. Ireland
on
was
now
hastily
tion
by
the
the
a
already
carry
to
intoler-
the
capitu-
soon
too
it
demanded
expedition
Parliament
and
and
the
into
Legislature.
This
of
Britain,
Great
qualtfica-
obtained
the
royal
to
the
Irish
transmitted
by
establ-
dependence
or any
repeal
instantly
and
of,
debate,
were, on
Ireland
bordering
eternal
Cabinet
without
communicated
by
nearly
I, declaratory
England,
was
signed
lost.
George
of
copy
and
of
repealed,
British
and
an
consider
Their
frightened.
had
concessions
6th
supremacy
the
now
They
“‘to
committee
should grant, to build a for their deliverer” ({i-e.
estate
already
with
The
an
impossible
was
a
appoint
Parliament
was
Cabinet
America
therefore,
to
proposed
sum
thought
execution.
Viceroy,
declares
had
usurped
as
Bagenal
British
assent,
hand
under
accomplish our independence as a nation.”’ triumphantly carried (only two votes were Fitzpatrick, the secretary, had accelerated the vote by
degenerated
ishing
she
the
us
and address
it.
Bills
England
that
by
and report what suitable mansion Grattan).
Jation,
other
men,
against
The
the
moment
that
until
Ireland,
considered
artifice). Beauchamp
of
between
Walsh:
rights as Grattan’s
ance
on
at
Legislature,
to
laws
sat
actually
David
cast
question
Broadstreet
Samuel
Flood,
can our
in particular
exist”.178
Parliament
her
and
MARX
to
circulars
the
Volunteer
commanders. HI:
Chap.
reign of securing
An
Act,
his late Majesty the dependency
repeal
an
Act
made
in
the
King George I, entitled, An of the Kingdom of Ireland
year
6th
Act
of
the
for the better the Crown of
upon
Britain.
Great
an
‘Whereas, Majesty,
that
Excellent
it
and
assembled,
and
by
this
Act,
things
be
by
therein
the
the
with and
may
etc.,
passed
enacted,
and
temporal,
passing
of
was
Act
may
Majesty,
spiritual
and
to
and
be
it
the
advice
of
the
same,
above-mentioned
contained,
shall
be,
and
your
please by
the
excellent
King’s
Most
consent of the Lords this present Parliament
and in
Commons,
authority
it
enacted,
Act,
that
from
and
the
is, and
are
and
after
several
here by
the
matters
repealed.”
IRELAND
FROM
Irish subject
House
declared
of
that
‘‘the
Mr.
Viceregal
—the
King’s
best
The
Viceroy
emancipated in
any
told,
her
a
in
was,
This
got
Grattan
her
having
ing
to
Irish
House
concession, reward had their
to
any the
through
both
growth Whigs.
of But
a
zeal their
and last
the
severity
to
Great
ever
occurred
of
England,
her
of
House
having
of
horrors,
arrogance.
humbled
Irish
King
for
that
history
and
1795,
in
of
Commons.
was
a most
in
prosperity.
of
impeach
Curran
Westmoreland
for
troops (which, accordremain in Ireland) to be
always for
service.
foreign Fiasco
to the
of
patriotism,
stages
in
the
Reform
Bill
and
ameliorate,
by
partial
were
of
by
Code
concessions the
bigotism
on.
Catholics,
and
Commons,
Those
passed
[though]
the
some
introduced,
House stirring
Penal
and
Catholics,
Opposed
powers
to
the
of
Bills
state
satisfaction
Westmoreland
12,000
the
the
Lord
Ireland
state to
Castle
The
tolerating length
When
opposition. of
Houses.
at
period:
of
depressed
great
(the
House.
Commons:
effective
afforded
this
kingdom
stages,
latter
that
had
from
the
to 1783. (The Volunteers. )
their
for
relaxing still
by
should
of
the
arrived
without
rejected
a part
1782 of the
A) From Great Defeat
seryices
as
whole
intention
stipulation, out of that
drafted
he
grant
the
of
domination
emanating the
behalf
his
the
extraordinary
progressive
an
permitted
.
people intended
Park’”’
on
reward
Ireland,
and
even
suggested
the
Phoenix
artifice
on
from
unexampled
Irish
the
Conolly
1782 (AFTER THE DECLARATION INDEPENDENCE) TO 1795
remark
removed
as
from
Il. FROM OF
was
the
shallow
£50,000
General
of
from
and,
course,
of
to
sentence,
single
the
proposing,
country
Government,
jealousies,
in
Ireland
incident
with
resumed
Thomas
in Ireland.
Grattan
his
was an
Britain,
Palace
Bagenal
a part
felt
187
180!
OF
£100,000.Mr.
as
offer,
Palace
of
to
England,
of
to
UNION
1782.
May,
of Portland
begged
the
Grattan,
30
TO
proposed
Grattan;
Duke
Lieutenant)
REVOLUTION
Commons,
to
reward
of
Lord
AMERICAN
very as
in Bills
however limited, the
first
principle. Grattan still believed in the Fox himself, wearied by a protracted
188
KARL
course the
of the
slow
of
Irish
people,
madequacy
been
on
the
to
state ‘‘that
the
connexion’’,
that
Irish
“‘some
treaty,
which
ments,
and
by
plans
the
when
statute
not
and
nature
that
on,
an
had
would
be
a
might
be
adopted
by
be
permanent before
the
upon,
entered
arrangement
zrrevocable
must
but of
laid
treaty
to,
alluded
alone, basis
and
Parliament,
there
solid
Ireland
heretofore
British
stand
a
by
Ministers,
proceeded become
finally
the
I being
could
of
Irish
that
in
George
adjustment,
final
Parliament
6th
that
of
a
measures
opinions
to
proclaimed
occasion
the
the
confirmed
openly
the
took
of
repeal by
all
He
repeal
accompanied
and
of
adopted.
once
at
deception,
MARX
both
Parlia-
between
the
two
countries”.
By in
was
that
indisputably
mons,
but
19
Even
in
‘that
moved the
of
concerns
all
in
| the
of
Irish
to
Parliament,
external
and
this
of
House
of
Com-
“to
affirm
Volunteers.
leave
for
Irish
introduction hand,
was
leave
and
had
Flood right
other
exclusive
nally
support
supported
bring in a to make
tnternal
laws
affecting
whatsoever”.
was
Bill
Bill
negatived
without
Grattan!
On the Grattan:
and
the
1782,
the
division. of
feebly
exclusive
country,
that
was
[had
July,
sole
final adjustment duplicity became
proved.
Flood
Still
the
a
speech, the Irish delusion of dissipated, the Viceroy’s
a moment
fully,
to
refused
to
right
externally
been
Parliament
bring
legislate
had
for
been
in
Mr. by
the
in the
irrevocably
cases
all
motion
foolish
bill,
Flood’s
Ireland
asserted
and
finally
passed
because
the
whatsoever,
Parliament
acknowledged
of
by
sole inter-
Ireland, the
and
British
Parliament”
was
(which contrary!) missed
27
“your
of
his
of
office
1782,
July,
proroguing claims
speech
were
to
as
the
councils
of
the
Constitution.
liberty
of
of
Great
that
(For
his
scepticism
by
Parliament
Flood
the
Kingdom
same and
were
spirit could
declared had
the
been
dis-
)
was
prorogued.
amongst
stated
Britain,
had
himself
Vice-Treasurer.
the
Portland directed
ty
the
true).
(Because
from
On
not
other
that
not
influenced
gave
In
the
things:
rise
and
stabili-
fail
of
success,
as soon
by
the
avowed
friends
IRELAND
FROM
the
‘Convince
convinced,
AMERICAN
removed;
that
your
people in
every
that
REVOLUTION
cause
both
several
past
of
countries
them
Convince nected
in
The North
that
unity
of
two
the
pledged
their
an
be
and
are now
unity
Rockingham
of
of
ourselves
ts finally to each adherence to that
good
faith
Britain
Ireland, equally
kingdoms
are y
discontents
inviolable Great
189
has
reposed
engages
your
liberal
and
one,
on
national enlarged.
con-
indissolubly
interests.”
died
(1782).
Fox
and
Lord
Coalition.
Marquis
superseded
by
of Buckingham) Lord,
afterwards
1783).
Temple
credit
Earl
(his
amongst
the
the
his
aristocracy
he
the
of
brother
Mr.,
1782—3
Though
people,
became
he
June,
no
obtained
made
considerable
patriots
(Charlemont,
etc.).
Grattan
The
armed
capacity: More
Volunteers
They
regimental
to
longer
any statute or law theretofore oppose their execution with magistrates
embarassed,
under
the
no
in
was
spelt)
Administration was]
In
the
placeman opposed Protested could
was
House in
by
British of
Ireland,
the Bill against not
them,
causes
could
many
act
of
Cathol-
to be
obeyed,
England,
and
and
The
judges
were on,
proceeded though
Statutes,
them, no important
juries Laws,
Flood
and
the
injudicious
to
fortunes.
the be
the
naming
would find theretofore Grattan,
conduct
the
British nation. of
some
Parliament. (British)
Commons
although
of Concession the Power of against
upon
them
suffer
in
citizens.
always in the majority. The to foster this division of the
wanted
the
to
or
under
plead
as
appeared
lives
British
of
baffled of
their
necessarily suspended. was divided between
(Whig
members
now obey,
deliberative
debated
enacted
legal
counsel would the operation of
Parliament
latter
act
no
authority
Ireland, for them, force,
to
refused
greatly
and
accession
Strong
no
resolved
a
assumed
soldiers
Volunteers
muster-rolls.
They
now
had
as
paraded
150,000
than
(But
later
September,
reforms.
of
(who
Secretary
(15
small
body
Temple
Chief
Grenville)
made
the
from
progress
(He
and
which
1801
OF
as you
districts,
candour of sentiments
constitution,
Marquis
Portland
ics.
and of
UNION
jealousies
have
other, and their best security will compact; that the implicit reliance the honour, generosity, character to a return
TO
the
not to
will
Irish,
Sir
viz.
George
Ireland, and Repeal King and Parliament to of
the
Young
(Sinecure
Vice-treasurer
Ministers.
)
of
pass
of
6,
Ireland)
George I. such bills.
190
KARL
Lord
to
ed
appeal law
notwithstanding
Mansfield,
entertain, the
from
depriving
of had
money
per
cent.
by
the
in
the
Felt
Bench
British
per
5
sums
large that
in
not
appelant jurisdiction transferred to Ireland herself: Lord the
of
and
to
leave
for
to
Abingdon,
King
taken
hence
his
House
dissipated. Now
new
waiting
for
further
Ireland,
they
ANNO
Ch.
XXVIII.
Parliaments
and
Majesty’s
adjudged
said
any
in
Britain.
.
last}
are
Act
etc.
be
it
of
Ireland,
declared
be
that
Kingdom,
decided
appeal
established
and
questioned
or
thence,
any
have
preventing the
or
in
ascertained
secure
appeal
to
questionable.
And
be
it
received
or
adjudged,
*
In
the
further
enacted
or any
that
the
by
laws
twenty-third
.
Majesty’s be,
regnal
and
ever, that
other
of
heard, of
provisions
the
people
said
right
enacted
claimed by
and
no
is
of
thereby
shall, writ
proceeding
year
therein
Courts it
King
at
no
error
of
be
Great
time
or
by
Hts
etc. the
and to have instituted in and
finally,
to
be
hereafter,
be
appeal by
the
Ireland
Majesty
declared
heard
George
His
of
and
of
of
the
and
any
from
Kingdom the
which
rights
bound only by laws enacted by Kingdom, in all cases whatever
only
His for
from
doubts
received,
the
whether
to
enacted...
shall
the
Without
legislation
of
being
Courts
arisen
bound
error
of
from
all
exclusive
matters
in
writ
sufficient
in
Great
amongst
Ministry.
and the Parliament of that Kingdom, in all cases whatever, all actions and suits at law or in equity, which may be without
in
confidence
(1783)
and
Kingdom
Majesty’s
and to
whole
III. REGIS*
the rights claimed by them, to be Majesty and the Parliament of that people
authority
the
ground
TERTIO
Ireland,
that
His
the
remonstrances
concerning
of
doubts
denied
and
Statute:
removing
for
arise,
in
facilities
British courts to part with it.
throughout
peremptory
preventing
of
Whereas
(their
.
for
Courts
additional
totally
British
following
Courts
the
much
VICESSIMO
Act
might
and
judicature;
His
An
or
arisen,
any
All
the
GEORGII
have
gain
arms
of
and the
interest
Ireland.
of
gained
panic
passed
no
in Ireland. Mansfield gain the additional 1
reluctance
paraded.
Flood
people.
The
of
to emancipate Ireland; he moved Bill to re-assert the right of England
to
beat
120,000
above
knew
“he
England
concerns
the
that
from
Lords,
of
an
Westminster,
jurisdiction”’.
to
likely
Declaratory in
vested
I, proceed-
George
at
observing
being
of
Volunteers
kingdom;
Britain
a
in
externally
The
the
Parliament
bring
legislate
in
its
of
6,
of
Bench,!79
England, 6 per cent of Irish mortgages to
were
they
repeal
Ireland,
of
Court
cent
the
King’s
of
Court
King’s
was very
placed
the
MARX
or
II].—Ed.
in
shall
be
any
of
IRELAND
His
FROM
Majesty’s
equity,
in
Courts
instituted
etc.
Ireland
by
AMERICAN
any
in
measure
Mr.
Townshend, the
observation. entered
to
to
patriots.
Irish
had
was
events and borough of
of
the
nominated
House Peers,
representation
money,
and
for
office.
These
executive
One
individuals bidder,
Viceroy
to
the
the
purity its
came their
of
efficiency
were Peers,
the
Peers
of
that
trust,
nominated sold their returned
representatives compose 1/4 of
elected the Irish
.of
determined
to
several
it
uses
for at
by Commons.
demand
a
voted
was
reform
by
purchased
the
was
sold
of
the
purposes
and
had
the
etc.
money,
of facts
Many to the
nomination
that
the
of
again
of
number
the people did The Volunteers
regiments
the
The
Commoners.
appeared
freely
of
constitutionally
Commoners
members
the
individuals
way
this
patronage and
by
Volunteers
nine
Volunteer
members
representation made by servants
The
its
England.
King
the
for
measures.
against
Commons
were
on the neces-
the
of
Irish
security
created
exercise
the
without
in
The
of
Irish
because,
nominated
the
in
among
Many
who
the
discussion
no of
Act
with
conclusion
duplicity
Secretary;
from
was
in
carry
others
The
the
system.!8®
his
Delegates
to
purchases
Peer openly
or
the
prominent
people
Government,
ministers
measure
Parliament
Commons.
and
the
of
for
little
arrangement
Renunciation
Parhament,
Commons
proxy
in
very
consequential
either
of
The
there
Reform,
and
length
of
re-
and
with
mere
as to
enemy. led
own
(borough-mongers)
the
in
Commons
Houses,
and
a
them
Irish
his
rotten
House
best
or
law
Kingdom
of
nations.This
most
Act
their
reform
sifted.
the
constitutional
people
the
become
Grattan
of
both
out
liberties.
Renunciation
instability
its
at
otherwise the Renunciation Act of the Would have been quite unnecessary. They their
comprehensive
Irish
in
19]
suit
House
debate
two
convinced
discredited
Flood
The
or
Courts
British
general the
the It
secure had
the
held
a
of
satisfy
had
to
1801
OF
action
through
England
corruption, British Parliament
sity
any
in
without
between
Parliament.
English
UNION
Majesty’s
into
assent
In
own or
Ireland people. Mr.
His
of
passed
part
into
late
Kingdom,
brought
Royal
declaratory
too
this
TO
etc.
This ceived
REVOLUTION
not at
Parliament. assembled
192
at
KARL
to
Dungannon,
immediate
now.
reform
300 by
10
the
of
of
Derry
and
their
from
Earl
of in
Then
England.
Charlemont
of
Derry,
mont
Flood his
Flood
and
the
on
by the
tt
could
to
question.
a
the
presidency. Parliament
of
withheld
Earl
one
he
the
of
(support-
Bristol,
of in
the
from
jealousy
intrigue
plan
of
Bishop
Convention
side,
reform,
and
Charle-
Flood
till
obeyed
his
the
Mr.
to
directed
and
forthwith,
by
framed
was
Convention,
permanent
made Mr.
the
long
[occurred]
Parliament
were
the
on
magnificent Bishop of
commercial By
was
Rotunda
other.
deliberation, him
the tool.
Bishop
by
Dublin. [The detachments of
for
be
of
at
reform
not
before
the
a
were
sitting
first
The
rivals tf
also] their
collision
and
Convention
decided
A
approved
presented
that
elected
friends
much
After
the
was
arrived.
and
knew
was was
[there
Grattan)
between
the
for
an
them
of
Commons
counties.
were
of
influence
many
the
meeting (vis-a-vis the House of Parliament).
Ireland,
England.
by
and
proclaimed
Charlemont
Ministers
effected
ed
great
[had]
influence,
Lords
respective
their place of the Commons’
British
were
Flood
means
and
National Convention of Ireland arrived there escorted by small
as
chosen dome
expediency
great
of of
corps. 1783 was
November,
Volunteers
The
men
House
different
the Grand delegates]
the
Parliament.
of
delegates,
members chosen
consider
MARX
sittings
be of
Parliament
had
instructions,
and
moved for leave to bring in a Bill of reform of the Parliament. The Government knew that the triumph of the Parliament implied not only the destruction of the Convention, but of the
Volunteers.
Government refused leave to bring in Flood’s Bill, it had originated from their (the Volunteers) deliberations. (Yelverton now Attorney-General.) (Furious speech of Fitzgibbon.) Unprecedentedly violent debate. The
The because
was
Bill
rejected
placemen
and
to
intended Union
never by
Bill
could
Conolly),
Charlemont,
the
very
operate. 1800,
in
have
to
158
by
49;
persons Ditto
158
which,
if
been
passed.
offending
against
suppressing
this
An
158
on
the
of whom
placemen the
address the
news,
the who
Reform
to
had
the
Volunteers, told
the
were
majority reform
carried
was the
succeeded,
King
(moved
carried. Volunteers,
Earl he
IRELAND
had
FROM
a note
received
no
hopes Bill
own
the
was now
door
became
was
a
the
opposite.
the
other
high.
no
die.
the
“The longer
man.
the
theme
a
nor
constitution;
calling
the
realm,
The
Bishop
conclusion “The
herself
your
or
once
3
in
millions I
ts
Tyranny
The the
not
when those
a part
one
Government,
of
and
resolved
events. Many too strong.
ment
language very rapidly
ment
etc.
December
But,
1,
lost
ground.
1783.—Ed.
million
of
a
gentlemen
Allegiance
(too the
The No
is
January,
the
impotent
to
patriots
in all
of
1784): avail
to
better the
dearest
Protestants
Bill to
due
best
the
counterpoise
you
the
our
encroachments,
over
only
idea of military
in
from
aid
divided
of
summon
and
of
be
no
necessarily
foreign
community
Government,
of
can
coadjutors,
encroachments, the
of
Human yourselves,
14
in
engines
united
the
of
must
off
of
Catholics.
are
All
(dated
ward
says
Ireland
virtuous
Ireland
to
force
of
strain
scale
to
the
those of
destitute
For
Bishop’s
*
same
under
Government
progress
.
be
others.
appeal
all
corruption
of
your
and
of
united
dispute
on ran
toleration
bigotry,
interests
rights the
of
Battalion,
come
tyranny
and
liberty, the
internal
acquiesce the
inalienable
can never,
in
now
is whole
more anew
exercise and
her
He quite
Battalion’’,
persuasions.
Lordship
said:
hour of
was
effected
Rights
of
extermination
religious
answered he
Bishop
down.
The
This
the
religious
of
object—the
professions.”
in
and
partisans.
superstition
of
from
and
the
separate.
itself ‘Bill other things:
among
can
civil
The
expected.
diversity
great
side,
the
came,
delegates
Bishop
one
of
to
began
the
the
the
he only
adjourned
went
on
that
sitting;
of
dissolved.
Exclusion
measures,
decided
HE
of
to
ought
Charlemont
Catholics,
clouds
by
residue
left
morning
hour
present.
the
fled
one
Monday
Convention
Government
suffer
promoting
the
the usual
hated
being of
the
secretly
and
gloomy
pursuit
the
which
ulterior
had
popular
A Northern Corps, Address to the Bishop disunion,
On
193
Convention
upon
the
people
mischief
He
1801
OF
Commons,
the
were
When
UNION
of
decide
before
partisans
became
The
to
more.
closed,
bigot,
House
rejected.
Rotunda
sine
TO
decision,
then
be
immediate
Convention
the
speedy
meet
to
the
from
should
should
repaired his
REVOLUTION
till Monday,*
the
they
a
of
adjourn if
AMERICAN
against
Rights
of
consistency—
to
Protection.”’
act)
to
watch
thought
coercing the language to
the
ParliaParlia-
194
KARL
The
people
were
the
Parliament
compact; paralysed, declension.
and
the
weak
and
the
Convention,
to
presented bodies, military,
now
Meetings
of
had
the
as
military
scouted
the
the
were
Volunteers the
Of
Bill,
suspended,
languid
vanity
from
civil the
was
it
was
it
popular.
their
reviews
their
of
be
course,
because
because
rapid
to
Bill
solely
character.
Bill,
a
dissolution
Reform
military
civil
the
after
a
were
Volunteers exhibited
emanating
with
amuse
the
Nation
recommended
rejected
to
continued,
the
of
remained
Government
Charlemont,
Parliament,
who
the
corrupted,
spirit
foolish
unconnected
placemen,
but
was
high
The
of
severed,
MARX
deluded
general.
temperate
The gamed
ground.
blows ground
The
some
for
and
(bourgeois The
1783.
Pitt
From
the
Pitt
Marquis
[became
for
Duke
1787—5
John
of the]
Fane,
(Hobart,
from
Sale
to
United
(Lord
lost
of
Rutland
died
October,
1791
Irishmen)
second
Earl
of
Viceroy
(16
Westmoreland
5 January,
1790
onwards
House
of
Grattan,
Pension
of Peerages
moreland’s
Earl
of
Temple)
December,
1790). of
material
(formerly
time
Earl
Bill,
Lieutenant)
Buckingham
afterwards
the Insh (Flood,
France.
Duke
1783
of
the
of
Rutland
of
January,
Place
these
etc.)
in England.
The 1787. The
In
survived
(Grattan
Minister.
End
(Foundation
Reform
orators
(!)
B)
ry)
Ireland
of
Whig
influence.
December Viceroy
Volunteers
years.
now
system
parliamentary)
and
measures Office,
Bill,
[was
(until etc.)
Police
pressed
by
hence
after
the the
1795).
attempts
at
failed.
Responsibility the
Lieutenant] Secre ta-
Chief
repeated
Commons
Curran
into
Lord
Buckinghamshire,
Bill,
of
Inquiry
Dublin
Opposition
Revolution
were
into the
during of
the
most West-
1789
in
IRELAND
FROM
The
AMERICAN
Place,
Mr.
Grattan,
The
Place
thereby
to
was
There strength
a
the
Irish
teers.
into
decline of party
bona
for
of
and
behalf
the
also
Emancipation,
Volunteer organisation, to 1790. We have Tone’s
up
out,
broke
both
the
and
Lord
clothing
the
and
by
a
forth the
violently
studied
defence
in
their the
the
of
This
Committee
the
Union}
motion
was
a
told
pockets,
between
“in
rank’’,
he
a grant
of
at the
levelled
reasons
its
of
to
efforts
elect
attached
by
and this
still
the for
reform
members the
King’s
1785, Mr. court, for the
to
a
*
7*
few other 1783-1791.
were
made
the
of
in
1784.
of
County
congress. a
moved Speech
“The
a great fool-rogue”
independent
crown a vote
was
inserted
by
In
of
of
Curran.
Marx.—Ed.
censure
we
treated
in
consequence
of
summoned 25
the
this
motion,
minority.
them,
of
Dublin,
for
For
71.
still
the
the things questions
objects
Kilmainham
of
on
Bench,
attachment.
Shows
a
to
national
a
to
even com-
friends,
(Curran’s)
speaking
before
period
Brownlow
that
his
the Regency Bills were period as international
England;
February, 143
to
than
Henry Rezlly, Sheriff to the court-house
bailiwick
1784,
being
FitzgibCurran, (Curran)
of the Volunteers.... I shall to gentlemen, with the King’s
rather
allude
during
requisition,
his
and
however,
Renewed
a
Volun-
streets.”’
Iraland
Parliament
Volunhim,
higher
moved
the
of
One
against
Curran
to
raised
debated.
panegyric country
Propositions important during
shall,
that
parties—were
Milttia
as
and,
being
by
Militia.
Orde’s
most
the
of
word
Catholic
Reform
1785.
Minister,
Mountjoy the
14,
February of
rewarded,
therefore
in
the
Castle-
carried—the fool-rogue* Grattan went with the Government. bon, the Attorney General, said amongst other things against who opposed the Bill and defended the Volunteers: ‘‘he
beggars
fide
packing
of
mstruments
as
Emancipation
Commons.
on
being
of
£20,000
mission
laws.
accepting
failed.
Revolution
of
{
actually
poured entrust
by
dispirited.
became teers,
proposed
passed
power
the the
of
things
Liberal
House
hope
Viceroy,
Minister
one
these
Club—the
Gardiner
the
Bills
195
Union.
all
steady
Whig
and
feeble
the
French
the
the
questions
the
of
the
1801
OF
Responsibility
by
was
Bill
1790
Tithe
Reform,
and
leaving
carrying
Up
UNION
bill
this
for
TO
to vacate the seats of members Government, omitting the term of
offices,
Parliament;
and to
acceded
under
when
Pension
Bill—a
offices
reagh
REVOLUTION
Mr. and
on
Motion
October,
Reilly
on the
the
was 24
judges
rejected
by
196
KARL
PENSIONS,
DISFRANCHISEMENT GOVERNMENT
The
began
force,
to
endeavour
regain
1782,
in
and
OF
EXCISE
MARX
OFFICERS,
CORRUPTION
by
corruption
increased
was
what
greatly
the
after
to
surrendered defeat
of
Orde’s
Propositions. Pensions
13
Pensions,
1786.
March,
to limit the amount Calendas Graecas,* was
Forbes
ad
was
to
the
“restrain
Irish
carried.
As
the
for
independence
House)
have
‘“‘will
..
the
Parliament
of
this
security
said
Curran
i.e.
the
they’’
(the
no
people,
or
found
authority”
a
interest
hoped
(these
Secretaries), with
as
tions”
tion
in
honourable
was
a
the
honours
shameful
a new
independence
*
**
Viceroy,
the
good
responsibility A
succession
look
his
for
and of
the
can
be
men”
of
with
hearts,
Orde’s
responProposi-
Commercial
opposes
the
principle
gross
A
encouragement
the
as
Bill
general
every
of
the
of
and
applica-
human
pension list, at the best of the present abuses of it have
force of
February,
Until
See
grant
of
the
below,
the
of
the
Riot
to
the
The
the
Greek
pp.
the
that
vice,
was
times,
gone
from
beggar
badges
a
penal
law
steals
a
beyond
a
magistrate.
any
a
is
It is
law
a
Bill
to
was
from
that
Great
to
lay
child. It to badges
necessary
from
a
to
man
Secretary
adopted
prostitu-
of
titles,
dignity
of
would “restrain public treasure.... It
and
suffering
Bill
executive Irish
the
barren
species
honours
of
pension,
a
a new
by
granting
a
State
Act,
Parliament” 1790.
degraded
of
purpose
(Curran). of
been
before,
the
profusion
counterpotse
has
the
for for
reducing
11
list
dignity,
mendicancy”’
giving
a
in
sometimes
you
remember
Bounty....
to
The but
unknown
foundation
steal
heads, will
any
while
(Curran). unhappy
“That
that
Royal
money
grievance.... this country:
all bounds”
the
will
member
the
of
people’s
is a crying scandal to
tion
with “Where
You
Minister?
restraint the
of
‘‘sometimes (Curran).
.
this
of
that
to
first
What
Secretary?
coming
one” (Curran). limiting Pensions.
interest
etc....
fame
English
no
have
Bill
(Curran). right
‘“‘A
being
an
‘‘delegated
can
future
in
neither”
a
**
in
for
oftener
sibility
(here) who
Secretary,
the
of
members
in the kingdom has a shilling, they will not want 12 March, 1787. (Forbes renewed his Bill for Curran supported him. Orde, Secretary. Also failed.) “The King’s it falls to
of
necessity”.
sins
independence,
man
next
.
object
physical of
Bill
adjournment
ts laying a foundation
Crown
their
for
The
Commons.
defeated,
wrong by a covers a multitude
Pension List, like charity, to the members of this House
“The
home
of
was
doing
from
Crown
House
pensions
of
of
as
Britain,
preserve
the
(Curran). House
calends.—Ed.
198-201.—Ed.
of
Commons
(Government
Corrup-
a
FRO M
tion
Patriot
and
convinced
nothing
address
it.
The
and
House
of
The
Executive
Ireland,
then
us,
in
and
Crown
to
general,
revenue
the
refuse
of
of
boroughs
House
of
Commons.
H.
Sir
Dublin The
Police
opposed
was
the
naturally House
Viceroy,
says
Curran increased
had
“In
of
he
mit
to
told the
the
that
*
See
men,
78.
he
that
it
is
below,
pp.
Harcourt
a compact
management
to
the
loose rob
our honour among us them
201-02—Ed.
.
have
of
and
our
the
sell
”’
stamps! “I
liberty,
property, who
for
appalled: rise
now and them
an
Tam
we are
if
but in
pensions....
people
by
places
debased.”
or
of
Bill,* to the
executed
into
became
places
their
gentlemen
be
make
prying
tyrant
by
West-
was made that stamps { stamp
should to
became
whom
honest
}
addition
order
members
your you
and
in
Salaries.
Marquts
Regency
the
of
times
them
county
arises
the
£13,000
union, of
to
lawful
among
by
100 let
corruption.)
in
to
night,
Rejected
(afterwards
failure
Harcourt’s
you,
sunk
corruption
Lord
the
‘“Two
persons,
etc.
Ordnance,
separated
rose
Temple
_
per
4d.
Officers’
down
government
his
the
and
as you
of
of
(Under
in
of
Stamp
the
1784,
in
at
taking
patronage.
to
132
by
them
of
that
effect
useless
disturbances
1790.
Earl
Board,
Parliament.
danger
have
plunder
and
Secretary.
the
granted
300
of
showing
the and
old
of
cut
means
because
list;
divided,
assembly
watch
them,
his
alia:
Buckingham
proportion
when
some
of
A
February,
one
Accounts
been
board).
was
Revenue
of
members
taken
Hobart
Pension
Board
duties
one
things:
4
incensed
the
infamous
Rejected
regulate
inter
Buckingham),
the
to
(This
81.$
moreland
to
waste,
Resolutions.
police.
Commons.
proposes
to
141
a
nation,
(Curran). Police.
among
been
by
servants
avowed
the
of
Dublin
other
on
sent to grind us are, of excise of ficers—
Cart-loads
resolutions with
measures
ineffectual.”’ of
Curran
the
the
men
the
election”
1789.
two
attended
said
had
capital
an
The
fulfilled.
our misfortunes to as arguments against
from
corner
of
April,
was
support
in
“Advantage enslave
25
System
Ministers Curran
eve
the
moved
Cavendish
.
was
Excise
of
and
events
comes
every
from
on
possession
very allia:
Britain....
Great
92.
corrupt
and
crime
Administration
troops—collected
to
occasion
men
these inter
measure
this
the
Ministers.) Forbes several recent penstons.
that
own
her
uses said
every
of
on
speech of
136
save
Disfrancitisement to 93.
148
by
incompetent
Curran
opposition
‘‘The
his
now
and
1789.
April,
advantage
independence.
the
in
by
more
being
could
CORRUPTION
rejected
inflicted
took
provincialise
our
was
Bill
prophecy
Curran’s
English
21
Commons.
Bill.
the
rejected
GOVERNMENT
Officers’
of
censuring
was
motion
daily
Commons
policy
197
180 1
OF
public
the
of
foul
describing
supported
Curran
the
reform
the
from
U NI ON
TO
proceeded,
a
but
1782
of
an
moved
opposition
that
Constitution
ON REV O LUT I
A M ERI CAN
I R E LA ND
subfairly
divide
to
the
198
KARL
MARX
administration.”’
In
his
bold
speech
to the French
alludes
Gurran
Revolution.
House of Commons. February 12, 1791. Government Corruption. New attempt of Curran to prove the impurities of Government. principal disposed
Curran’s
was
which
theme: “Raising of to purchase the
men
the peerage for of the people.”
to
liberties
“Miserable men introduced” (by these means) “‘into beasts of burden, to drudge for their employers.” On “those
introduced
the
by
which
have
have
to
tion
of
have
passed
.
in
this
a
a
This
a contract to
raise
people
to
law
laws,
frame
direction
and
that
of
dispose
corruption
Ireland,
of
and
it
been
certain
been
the
entered
from
on
House.” (1790) them
uniformly
shameful
into
persons,
of seats in this of last session
demanded
has
restrain
has
peerage
the
we
in
Constttu-
We
a
of
the
have,
the
denied.
profusion
by
condition
would
pension-list
a Majority. We would have passed a law to exclude ever be the chattels of the government, from sitting was refused by a Majority. A bill to make some among you, and therefore amenable to public justice,
refused by who must
House--it resident
responsible
by
the
House, like other hand
raised’’.
that
Britain,
Great
it was persons,
person,
the
of
to
Lords,
of
under
a certain number ‘‘During the whole
their purchasing Curran states:
name
.
House
Kingdom,
been
proof
ministers
the
the
the
of
they
“Tl present of
into
property
of
this the
money,
.
acts of your governors—has been refused to Ireland gentlemen calling themselves her representatives...
the
for
majority
of
dental
unzform
a
is
to
proof
them”
(the
people)
“that
the
imputation of corrupt practices is founded in fact.” The vain attempt—in 1790-91—of the Parliamentary Minority against government corruption proves on the one hand its increase, on the
other
the
shows
why,
at
1791,
since
all
mere
tool
in
influence
last,
the
of
the
Parliamentary
the
French
foundation
hands
action
the
of
IRISH OF
OF
a)
In inquiry
May in
desired to competition
1784, the
Orde’s Duke
THE
etc.
REPELLED
that
Irish
the
Majority
in
a
proposed intercourse Trade
ON
OCCASION
BILL
Propositions. Lord
in
AGAINST
PROPOSITIONS
REGENCY
Commercial
Griffith
also
place]
and
GOVERNMENT
of Rutland,
commercial
show
THE
COMMERCIAL
ORDE’S
futile,
It
[took
* *
INDEPENDENCE
AND
(The
proved
1789.
of
Irishmen
Government.
x
ATTEMPTS
Revolution
United
of
the
Lieutenant) Irish
between should
be
House
of
Britain
and
protected
Commons
an
Ireland.
He
from
English
IRELAND
FROM
The 7
February,
on
11
February
called
the
Irish
(in fact,
1)
are
on
countries,
placing
the
of
Mr.
UNION
out
proposal the
Orde,
moved,
Chief
1801
OF
his
of
199
hand. announced,
Secretary,
on
11 propositions
the
English
of
principles
four
Taxes
1785,
he
this
TO
trade,
commonly
propositions
they
were
There
REVOLUTION
took
Government
On
and
two
AMERICAN
established
all
goods,
should
be
England
origin). in these and
foreign
propositions:
domestic,
passing
between
the
equal
and
on
Ireland
same
the
footing,
to the
ruin
on
same
latter.}
2)
on
Taxes
articles
goods
foreign
produced
in
either
Spanish, and American competition ).
3) That lation). 4)
the
That
trade
regulations
the
customs,
should
be
Imperial Yet
(English) this plan
and
over
patd
then
the
of
excises, to
always
(this
be
be
the
realities
of
French,
profits
of
English
to
the
English
(thus
revenue over
hereditary
to]
Treasury,
as a
than
the
unalterable
[amounting
navy. was proffered
higher
sacrificed
increasing,
should
surplus
certain
should
island
a
boon,
abdicating
legts-
(hearth
tax,
£656,000
a
reciprocity
plan;
and year)
support
the
for
the
of
the
Orde
(in
otherwise
Flood) hurried the Commons on to seize upon it, because the jealousy of the English monopolists might be awakened.
The
thing
was
and
voted
contrast
to
a
the
On
British
for
22nd
House
allowed
the
be
favour—to
return
in
by
for
1765
February,
of
of
paid
£140,000
new
of
taxes,
which
Commons
advantages
(i.e.
Pitt
moved
declared
competition)
the
that British
of
Resulution
Ireland
should
she had ““trvrevocably”’ granted to England an “aid”’ (i.e. general defence. North and the Tories, Fox and the Whigs—
in English Minister’.
out’’,
from
a
any
the
ingenuity
The addition
and
Good
interdicts
of
He
to
approved
Ireland
of
11
a
jealousy to Ireland a sure resource Fox obtained adjournments, and to
Lancashire
parley.
adverse
tribute)
for
Manoeuvre—
—saw born ed
in be
as soon
Commerce
as
as a party
asked
it.
London,
to
submitted Irish
by
serviceable
him
in
the
propositions injury.
fresh
Hope,
were
was
some
was
also
taken
had Half
on
away
been the
3
certain
by
terms:
their
of
to Irish form of 20
(articles
latd
Gloucester
the
suffered
Constitution,
be
from
trade.
English
increased
in
interdicted
clauses
which
all
“spoke
Pitt
retained of
“heaven sound-
was
all that that the
could
by
Act
thus
20,
each
propositions.
and
The
York.
Returned
namely,
9)
to
loss
globe, goods.
against the all England
whole
forced
England all
to
between
Magellan
to Ireland’s ships: customs legislation her
(art.4)
to
enact
200
KARL
(register) and
all
8),
navigation
toimpose
same
to adopt the finally {art. 17 to England.
laws
all the
or to
passed
colonial
duties
be
passed
that
system in custom-houses 18) to recognise all patents
and
by
England
England
did
that
(art.
England
MARX
(art. 5 6 and 7), did,
and
and
copyrights
granted
Irish House of Commons. 30 June, 1785: Orde of the House till Tuesday Fortnight. Curran adjournment is carried. Curran says:
moves the opposes
adjournthis. The
ment
we
‘“‘When
with
them.
endearing
23 the
had
word
adjournment
11
{ and
they
moves
asks
Curran
them only system of final
2 kingdoms’. this system, we
did
were
understand
corner
a new
Yes,
the
streets.”
the
of
charmed
them.
adjournment; what
Orde
that and
of
as a
between the advantages of
every
at
us, we
before
not
did
opposes;
Curran
carried.
1785.
“as
‘proposed
we rang
Orde
is
August,
propostttons
propositions
reciprocity
1785.
July,
11
the
—because
Why?
has
permanent
a
compensation called upon
“As
were
11
the
of
“become
could treat.’’ They were commercial adjustment
Parltament
the
for
expected
so!}
£ 140,000 a year on this exhausted country.” “We submithave oppressed the people with a load of taxes, as a comfor a commercial adjustment: we have not got that adjust-
to
impose ted.’’ “‘We pensation
ment.”
plainly
Curran
revenge
against
accept
that
would
be
from 12
be
speech
by
to
108
(i.e.
House, the
of
take would
He
threa-
Constitution
words’’.
All
this
is taken
Bill
20
propositions).
July. his
Leave
Curran.
votes:
19
by
would
adjournment.
“‘by
moved
Orde Flood,
Grattan,
127
by
23
thin
surrender
for
merely
of
1785.
August,
carried
not
people
a
in the
after
demand
answered
Curran’s
Opposed
a
the
who,
propositions
such
that
persons
the
20
the
tened
threatened
this
(the
to bring in the Bill was showed that the Bill would
rejected). Curran:
tion:
this
for
liberties
temper business
Bill
Ireland,
of
was
here
changed.
The
surrender submitted
of
to
England
should
Ireland.
The
Commons
for
I
and
fear
are rights, Bill. It
think
people
relief;
on
and
it’’
surrender British
of
by
it
by
purchase
enlightened
and
(the
Bill) the
of
they
go
must for
a
out
‘‘is is
majorities
of
strong, be the
they
.
enact the
to
bar
English
circuitous
not
such
annihilate of
the
trade
to
the
the
things
will
consequence, to
the
in
Formerly
would the
and
mistaken
times.
former
ques-
the
of
Constitution
Minister
which would contains a covenant
proper: here
of
the
judges
carried
people
thew this
a
portends
Ireland....
of
part
commercial
““The
have bear
Parliament
England,
a
if they laws as House
we
of of
are
IRELAND
FROM
a
accepting would Great
circuitous
to
strength
in
fact,
our
enforce
utter slavery, or rights through blood,
is
be
the
15
and
or
1785:
August,
session,
be
Ireland
in
cases
all
she
In
such
a
to
201
bind
externally,
gives the power of the compact,
This law breach
pleased;
while
an event
on
it
of
her
new
either
sink
gives
we must
to
what, the
Flood
into any Parliament
the
of
as
well
Bill,
the
Minister
abandoned
moved:
enter
whatsoever,
I,suspect,
best.”
presenting
Thereupon
to
and
at
Union
internally.”’ Curran supported House adjourned, and Orde’s the
as
Ireland,
of
ourselves bound not and exclusive nght
hold sole
power
A
1801
OF
must wade to a reassumption of their obliged to take refuge in a Union, which
Orde,
ever.
for
us
UNION
people
war or a
Civil
TO
internally. would be
obedience.
the
annthilation
at....
driving
bind what taxing
of
into
would
to
judging
of
it;
REVOLUTION
constitution....
a power
involve Britain,
construing
AMERICAN
engagement
the
we
as
externally
give up legislate
to to
Ireland
of
it for
“‘Resolved—That
commercially
him. Flood withdrew Propositions merged in
the for and
his
motion, secret design
a
the for
Union.
b)
Regency
Bill
(1789)
George III was mad for some time, this was concealed, in the end of it could no longer be hid. In the ministers’ draft of the address in answer to the Lord Lieutenant (Buckingham) (he had again become Viceroy in December 1787), they praised themselves.
1788
Irish
House
Amendment, in
support.
of
a sees
man
“Every
6,
February
Commons.
substituting
general the
1789.
expression
change
of public
moved
Grattan
loyalty.
of
Curran
administration
an
spoke
ts
that
approaching.”
(People thought Prince of Wales. )
the
been delayed principle of opposition etc? ”’
“It
Upon that
that
has what
Fox
so
with
February
was as
Fox
11,
23
reached
Britain
with
January, the
Irish
a party in another can Ireland enlist
the
without
Chief at
Castle
a
division
under
kingdom. herself in
although
he
Secretary),
the
prospect
of
the
Prince’s
The
Ministers
tried
to
postpone
the
discussion
Their avowed motive to have from England the British Parliament, appointing the Prince Regent of
the Regency. Resolutions of the Great
carried mask”’
Minister
Primer.
1789:
on
on
a
Buckingham’s
prostrated
Regency,
become
and opposed by wisdom or justice
Grattan’s Amendment was called Buckingham ‘‘a jobber in
(Fitzherbert
would
limited
and
powers.
accepted
Government.
by
These
the The
Resolutions
had
been
passed
Prince on 31st January, but postponement was refused by
not the
202
KARL
House.
Conolly
Prince
Regent
passed
without
a
to
address
full
to be kingly
to the Prince, as The. Motion was
presented
Powers.
division.
Buckingham.
agreed
an with
moved
Ireland
12, 1789. Conolly moved the address. February 17, conLords brought up and agreed to. On 19 February presented
February currence of to
then
of
MARX
He
to
refused
transmit
it
by
tt.
transmit
deputation.
20, 1789, it was against Buckin-
February
Vote
censure
of
gham.
27, 1789. Deputation (Conolly, Commons with the answer of the
February letter to the the
“warmly”
Irish
20,
March
announcing
deliver thanking
Parliament.
1789.
his
O’Neill, etc.) Prince Regent,
A
more
still
letter
fervent
recovery,
father’s
is
read
im
the
of
the
Irish
Prince
Regent,
House
of
Com-
mons. maintain his power, had defended the nght of election of the Regent,
to
Pitt, England,
to restrain The tion
and carried in hence the right
power.
his Irish
in
against
case
this
the
maintained
oligarchic
and
common
the
ministerial
Constitu-
encroachments
of
Pitt.
are
There
this
for
lapse
of
two
time
things
to
still
be
considered,
1) Irish
the
Tithe
showing
peasantry at that time, and 2) The Dublin Lord Mayor
fluence
of
the
Protestant)
French
Irish
Irish
House
Disturbances Rents,
the
absenteeism,
Towards 1791)
of
in
RIOT
republicans
the
of
Catholic
zn-
election,
showing
the
upon
(into
bargain
1) TITHE RIOTS ETC. ACT INTRODUCED
South
bad
parties
of
caused
tenures,
close the
19,
January
Commons.
the
political
Revolution
state
the
the
the
middle-class.
ENGLISH
(the
etc.
Riots
of
by
the
united
North).
1787. misery
treatment
harsh
the
IN IRELAND
18
century
themselves
Outrages
the
of
in
the
people,
South.
Ttthes,
etc.
(since with
the the
end of peasants
a
IRELAND
FROM
AMERICAN
TO
UNION
1801
OF
203
the Lord Lieutenant’s Opening Speech, he referred to the outrages” (“Right Boys” of Kilkenny, who were bound each other by oath).181 Yet the only Bili on disturbances
1786.
In
“frequent
amongst brought
in
the
petitioned.
City
REVOLUTION
1787. Southern
by
the
The
Viceroy’s
outrages,
violent.
speech
and
During
instance) landlords
was
Government
the
this
Dublin
on
Police
the
Address
government
the
as
disturbances the people,
Bill,
more
much
referred
debates
debate
treated the of grinding
a
against
which
to
positively
in
to
reply
party
the
were
it
(Fitzgibbon
for
against thé clergy, accused abetting the disturbances,
and
the and
asked for fresh powers. House of Commons.
19 January, 1787. Fitzgibbon, in his speech (1787) said the disturbances commenced in Kerry, the people assembled in a mass-house, there took an oath to obey the laws of Captain Right. They soon spread through the province of Munster. Their objects were the tithes, then to regulate the price of lands, to raise the price of labour, and to oppose the collection of hearth-money and other taxes. “I am very well acquainted with the province of Munster, and I know that it is impossible for human wretchedness to exceed that of the miserable peasantry in that province. I know that the unhappy tenantry are ground to powder by relentless landlords—far from being able to give the clergy their just dues, they have not food or raiment for themselves, the landlords grasp the whole; and not satisfied with the present extortion, some landlords have been so base as to instigate the insurgents to rob the clergy of their ttthes, not in order to alleviate the distresses of the tenantry, but that they might add the clergy’s share to the cruel rack-rents already paid.... The poor people of Munster live in a more abject state of poverty than human nature can be supposed able to bear—their miseries are intolerable, but they do not originate with the clergy: nor can the Legislature stand by and see them take the redress into their own hands. Nothing can be done for their benefit while the country remains in a state of anarchy.”
.
a
Longfield,
were ment
a
without selves
division). been
exhausted;
their
House,
no
but
existence
the
peasantry
property “You
present set
are
of
be
to
Why, public
the
sale;
been
they
in
the
was
(it
Govern-
purpose. withdrawn
refused
.
this have
The
House
totally
song
of
landlords. No
revolt....
Not
with
a proper it?
are
become
been
and
bought
an
You
dented
wonder
that
a
man
single
the rebels... reformation
No;
this
non-restdence
redress....
and
you grant
has
empty
the
you your-
when
people
followed.
[was} connected solemnly for seats
disturbances
political
effects,
the
of
ever
rebellion
did
a
address
intermediate
of
the
accused
for
inevitable
long)
and
for
that
He
:
has
effect
people: Sir,
the
patience
(have
ripe
or consequence were called on the
to
alia
grievance,
not.
disturbances,
inter
tyranny
the the
of
the
complaints
productive
should
stand?
up
said
grievances
of
representation
at
causes...
the
landholders,
the
of
He
was
distress
amendment
to utteridle
have
the
an
stated
Gentleman,
the
a year
for
moved
“Cease
Cork
though
looking
of
Curran
of
County
exaggerated,
how and
absolute
in
the it at
does sold.
They
article
of
204
KARL
commerce—a
they
traffic
have
should People, als;
the
and
are
these
.
sent
may
they
to
down talk of
do
of
or
the
of
expanding
wretched
peasantry?
it
boroughs.
is
disturbances.
.
natural
As
they
of relief.... make repnisvile
of
System
demolish
administered.
which
name,
have
Bill’.
One
was
abandoned,
at
mass-houses
oaths
unlawful
was
which
Government,
but what, in God’s ” 1787. “Right Boy
19,
February
Commons.
to
magistrates found,
the
the
of
causes
real
money,
of
have formed hopes oppressed by law, will
though
commerce
with
House clause
the
peasantry
rotten
Saleable
a sum
for
to commissions of the peace (24 commissions of the to the County of Clare in one post) and to the sheriffs.
extends
You
constitution....
people
sell. them.... The when oppressed,
jobbing
peace
the
of
bought
MARX
dzrecting
combinations resisted
Curran
the
shall Bill
be
altoge-
ther:
strength
code
as
to
now
much
He
proposed....’’
us
into
imbrue committed
us
to
the
by
20,
February
was
barbarism
in the 192 to
a
of
the
we
were
.
“I
said
fear,”’
are
Discussion of to limit
until... 13
the
whole
were
would consider division. Curran
set
at
restored,
law
the
a
Question.
and
an
of Ireland.
to
should
thetr
ever
be
gentlemen with
an
period,
execute
express
peasants,
clergy,
whatever
not
may
have
are be
the
too wise to say that length of time.”
said idea
the
the
all
of
been of
inveterate
an
pass
intention
connived English evils
the
in
Bill
as no
and
go
the
can
resolution session,
dark
’’
.
of
causes
of the
men
he
““The
adverse
these
Secretary,
any
that
a
is they
honourable
accompanying
in
at
the
hope
or
alleviate,
as
receive
all example
) ‘‘declares
complaints.”’
of
a
without
of
any
if
House
state
without
to
.
beyond
that
the
lost,
partial miserable
(an Englishman! not hold out Act
a
was
severe
represented
have
and
In
so great,
next
The motion Motion.
listen to their ‘‘That very body
to
Riot
etc.
moved the
of
Parliament!
Riot
a
oath
will
was
flame.”
to
distant, law)?
who
and
will
by
let
disavowal
however it” (that
the
and
perhaps
Bill
which
43.)
ts rebellion
having
penalties
Secretary”’
considered
could
the
The
dtstresses,
to to
Limerick,
by
to
coercion
former period.... The offence was local and such offence were universal.... The abject and
stranger
a
Wood-
or,
(The
Kerry,
176
any
peasantry
Bill,
Cork,
poor,
opening
Grattan’s
pains
of
in
Grattan
Dr.
of
emerging,
same
the tt to
the
the
of
Tithes.
the Tithe supported
“A
Curran:
relief
Kingdom
1787.
March,
tranquillity
the
for
as
“that,
Curran,
taken
of
sanguinary
war’’....
Tipperary. (The limiting motion rejected by Todesstrafe—capital punishment—for tendering
means
so
pamphlet
religious
moved
O'Neill
consciousness
of
of tithes “tending manifestly had so recently emerged, and
which
from
a
by
objects
to
alludes
bloodshed 31.)
1787.
passed.
raised
proper
be
Bishop of Cloyne, in defence the dtssensions from which we
plunge
Act
too
people
and
that
ward, revive
are
consequence
“The
Curran:
their
even
‘““‘Who the class
to
the
offences.” this
House
sanction
at
.
are
it
any to
above
rights
of
‘But must be from
any
IRELAND
FROM
AMERICAN
2) ELECTION
The with
disputed
THE LORD (1790)
OF
election
Ireland in
their
the
for
not
guilds
to
Parliament for the city, ment. Alderman James
16
1790
April,
the
year,
ensuing
names
any
return
who
the
The
Council.
interference
10
On the
He
the
Privy
Council,
1790,
and
Lord
The
that
Privy
Council
Howtson
was
Then
decided
a
meeting
was
meeting of
3d
the
on
James,
the
Privy
July, after
The
dispute Common
Aldermen
process,
with
times.
Common
Council
before
(who
became
Lord
he
Thus
and
this
Council,
and
on
resigned,
Aldermen,
Council,
and
20
the
for
the
whole
several
popular
This
election. This
Common
the
for
for
other
1789.)
for
August,
a new
the
James.
pleaded
Curran
elect
masterly.
by
freemen
of
one
in
Seven
led
of
Governthe old
struggle
Napper the
5th
August,
approved
by
ended
Tandy
in
carried
Aldermen,
and
the
the 17
sum-
82 at the Exchange. This Hamilton Rowan was in the chair; it appointing a committee to prepare a freeholders!
facts.
3rd
was
of
held
to
adjourned State
censuring
election
Fitzgibbon
Common Council and Privy Council. utter defeat of the Government. On the 16 July, in the Common Resolutions
Tandy
for
by
fellow
chosen
Napper
Howison.
in June
Clare,
them-
Member
as mayor
James
rejected.
pleads
Curran
or
similarly
is repeated
presided
connected
provincialtse
pledged
Mayor
him.
decided
Councilmen
Council,
Dublin
Lord
rejected
where
Council,
Council
flagellated
moned
or
Alderman
their
the
July,
Chancellor,
were
and of
Privy
1790,
was
govern
Council
Howtson:
repeated
Privy
Privy
James
chose
down
Alderman
Aldermen
before
re-elect
Dublin
to of
and Aldermen sat and voted Councilmen in a second.
Common
sent
elected The
came
of
place or pension from the Police Commissioner. Under
a
former
as
205
OF DUBLIN
MAYOR
one
1801
OF
a
held
was
the
afterwards
Council
party.
UNION
Mayoralty
Corporation laws the Lord Mayor chamber, the Sheriffs and Common the
TO
attempt of the English Government by corruption. Hence the bourgesses
the
selves
REVOLUTION
August
that
State
of
Facts
was
read,
and
James’s
resignation
announced.
Sir E, House of
Newenham Peers made
of the Whig Club and attacked avowed the Resolution. (The summer of 1789.)
(The Whig Fitzgibbon.)
Club,
met
on
on
24 July had in the read a Resolution them, until Lords Charlemont and Moira Whig Club was founded in Dublin, in the
denounced Fitzgibbon, who an audacious speech, where
2d
August,
drew
he
up
a
Report
against
Fitzgibbon had become so unpopular, that the guild of merchants, had, in the previous winter, voted him an address in a gold box, for services to their trading interests, expunged the resolutions on 13 July, who
1790,
as
“‘disgraceful’’.
206
KARL
From
the
above-quoted
of
“State
(Aggregate meeting of the citizens change.) Among other things it said:
we
“That citizens of
country
etc.
do to
refused
we
“that
sion,
. . only:
that
been,
in
in
dent
to
and
that
if
must
and
period c)
told
an
be
opposition
bought
on
the
the
to
1791
October
ers.
The
end
of
far
and the
as
West
of
rebellious
by
Dutch
were
December Worms.
nation
had
bought
in
for
by
a
half
administration,
Army
feet
bound
two
the
of
by last
indepenBritish
the
laws
of
points
apply
to
by
to of
Lord
4
and
English
on
repulsed they
The France Lyons
to
had well. and
in
1793.
to
has
(Arrival
Duke
Upper
October
December
1793, 1793
siege Fland-
towards
whole
victorious
the into
Rhine,
the
8
York,
of
back
of
Govern-
abandon
thrown
were
In
1795.
Westmoreland’s
abandon
Republicans
as
the
1795
April
Camden)
January,
Houchard,
of
Recall
Fitzwilliam’s
1791
thrashed allies
the
the
Fitzwilliam.) Continuation Lord ment. (His Secretary Major Hobart.)} French events during this time: the
this
present
commencement
the
replacement
October
Dunkirk,
corruption
etc.”
at
{ The
that
(Fitzgibbon)
Parliament
the
the
of
1782}
and
September
save
occa-
.
session
authority
Crown,
people
Delegates.
last
object,
of
etc.
Legislature
and
before
{From
the
former
Townshend,
to
again
a
Parliament, of
Members
sold
etc.;
approbation
the
high
in
continued
and
our in
or
avery
Marquis
the
dependent
English
From
by
Dublin
of
etc.;
meaning,
by
the
(Lord
of
the their
of
City
on
did,
expressed
opposition of
sold
Attomey-General,
the
1790: Ex-
years
11 liberty
the
of
us
Parliament
view,
was
defeat
Parliament,
Scotch
Royal
or
Westmoreland
of
Duties
late
other
nation
Judges,
of
the
10 the
last for
freedom
among
to have the
of
Administration
and
The
no
had
the
Earl
many
that
acknowledge
Government,
nation
the
the
of Protective
minority
order
the
million,
this
do
that
deny
scheme
the
of
that
Excellency
not
measures
those
the
His
the
we
‘‘that
acknowledge
do
favour
conduct
that for the active part
an
at
held
etc.;
we
“that
was
do acknowledge, Dublin did take
3,
August
Facts’,
Dublin,
of
MARX
the
territory in
the
they Toulon,
as
South
subdued which
I RELA N D
had
been
over
the
occupied
the
Moreau
they
them
and
2 07
180 1
OF
drove
the
Spanish
own country. won a total victory
in
their
Souham
at Tourcoing. battle of Fleurus
second
were
English,
attacked
conquered.
troops
the
ON UN I
TO
York
of
June,
quickly
and
May,
Duke
26
by
Pyrenees
1794—18
over
ON R EV O LUT I
CA N A MERI
FROM
The
leaders
to
compelled
(Jourdan). the
of
think
only
English of¢the
was
Belgium and
Dutch
defence
of
the
Netherlands. In
and
October
November
the
Dutch
lost
all
their
frontier
fortresses.
In
Jourdan
October
the
entire
he
entered
bank
left
Luxembourg
27
On
remained
In
of
the
the
Austrians
up to the
hands
26
October
Mainz
and
allies.
into
the
entry
Pichegru’s
abandon
only
the
of
marched
1795,
on
Mainz,
Rhine,
to
Netherlands. into
Amster-
Republic. Disseldorf
September
Mannheim
Rhein
in
January,
Batavian
the Left
Pichegru
October,
1795—20 dam.
of
Coblenz.
compelled
into
into
fell
hands.
Pichegru’s
hands
Jourdan’s
The
Austrians
and
had
to
across the Main. Clairfait defeated the French army on 29 October. Pichegru and Jourdan had to retreat. An armistice came into force towards the end of the year. Moreau was given the command of the Rhine army. At the beginning of 1795 a peace treaty was concluded withdraw
at Mainz
with the leaders of the Vendée. (The Peace of La Mabilois.) Pitt landed an émigré army at Quiberon on 27 June, 1795, etc. On 20 July tt was crushed by Hoche etc.183 {In February and March 1796 Stofflet, Charette and
were
others
1796
July civil
war
The in
Their objects
he
{Hoche]
in the
1796
Tone
court-martialled
to
First
97.
avowed
executed
to
the
brought
to
reported
had
been
Bonaparte
United
October
were
West
and
Irishmen
in
by
firing-squad.
Directory
an
that
In the
end.
Italy.
was
Society
by
founded
Theobald
Wolfe
1791.
(and Union
by
the
between
mass
of
the
Catholics
Societies
and
alone
wished
Protestants,
for)
perfect
208
KARL
Emancipation
1783)
and
and
others
out the
the
Whigs,
and
ing
in
political
ics
and
were The the
1792
independent have
already
in
creeds.
(Tone
Republic.
With-
been
overruled
by
as
on
did all the United Irish part, were rapidly advanc-
their
information.
(not
aristocratic
and
The
Whiggish)
now
to
Cathol-
28
in
the 4
printed
with
chiefly
soon
after,
but
1797.
we
Administration,
and
organ
itself
Dublin
September,
Westmoreland’s
of
chief
paper,
this
occupied
appeared
Star
until
support Its
the
Corps.
of
Netlson),
Emancipation
Catholic
two
Evening
received
Volunteer number
first
Samuel
commence
Dublin,
the
of
the
Star:
not
did
to
many
of
(manager
politics.
Returning the
this
both
of
would
publicly,
Catholics,
extended
and
Northern
Press
that
an
they
proposed
men
Societies. )
met
and
Confederation
French
for
were
the
leading
citizens,
January, the
the
the
United.
leading
was
in
The
spirit
for
Government
Soctety 1794.
until
Keogh
the
outvoted
Belfast
Socteties
men
leading
of
had
(Belfast
Catholics
Representation
the
of
cruelty
The
the
for
Popular
MARX
Parliamentary
remark
were
Reform
cries!
Irish
House
of
18
Commons.
1792.
February,
Emancipa-
Catholic
tion. These
proceedings
Protestants
the
of
by
the
was
thing
presentation
Antrim
of
County
small
Some
began
the
for
a
of
petition
from
the
(It
was
re-
Bill.
proposed
by
Grattan
jected.) Curran,
step
was
was
to to
.
and
the
and
modest
create
hold
them
their
Protestant
a partial our people, consequence desires
to
emigration
would know
what
every
of
extinction This
of
of
petition
23.
.
It
that
of
and
corruption
an
Union
with
that
would
be,
be
man
of
British
the
Irish
for
the
rejection
Great I will
consequence taxes,
name
English
a
Catholics
inflamed
people
was the
Britain. tell
him.
British
.
own of
trade;
next
merely
3
of
millions
the
of
mevitable
any
if
would
Ireland;
next
the
preservation
And
Jt
a most
The
Government,
question
fourth
from
without
as a
a
in
reject city.
themselves:
not
is
to
pleased
Catholics
fellow-subjects....
subserviency
the
to
the
their relief—it is a question of your liberty cannot long subsist alienation
participation The
was
Viceroy
from
or
the
208
petition
a division amongst the Catholics up as a body formidable to the
to
sufferings
present
the
Cork,
“At
moderate
one
be
the
it
would
be
it
would
be
etc.”
rejected Catholics.
with
indignation,
by
FRO M
I RELA ND
CA N A M ER I
ON REV O L UT I
DOINGS
CATHOLICS,
THE AND
OF
UNTIL
ADMINISTRATION
In
1792, the Catholic of delegates) met,
March a body
was
agitation
by
progress
of
societies
in
increased
means the
England in
to
grew
ligence
.
restore
the
aided
array,
their
the
in
Catholics
“In
were
they
BILL
or
rather Convention named its secretary.
them.;¢The
and
improve (1792)
supported
by
was
Dumourter
shining
political
Volunteer
discipline.
the
The
thundered
Catholics
all
in
(for The
Irishmen
the
their
the
The
the
United and
confidence,
December
Dissenters.185
RELIEF
most vigorous. organisation of
became
and
Scotland!84
alarmed.
demands
of
societies
the
IRISHMEN
CATHOLIC
Committee, and Tone was
Revolution,
and
number,
began
Corps
ministry out their
these
of
French
UNITED
THE
20 9
18 0 1
OF
U NI ON
1793
OF
it
TO
and
intel-
Brabant—Holland
spirit
was
prostrate
before him.”’ (Wolfe Tone. ) 7 December, 1792. Government Proclamation against meetings: In this Proclamation we read: ‘‘The first battalion Guards were to have paraded clothed like Frenchmen
was
Proclamation
16
1792,
was
Dr.
address
The
voted,
Rowan
your
“To
in
reform
this
in
in
today,
in
words
The
pursuit liberties
paratory to the to communicate not
soon
into
the
malignity
lies
but
as
nearly
that
our
the
the
.
adhere
4)
would For
we
wish
to
the
to
our cause, no
to
for
consider temple
sect,
but
of and to
were it (Catholic we go on as we do still
both
be
these
should
wanting
purposes
assemble
to it
pre-
The
not soon follow, and Is common cause will split
other,
does the
will
relapse
local
enemy,
island...
portal
conventions
people
of
which
one part
the
some
common
.
this
of the Protestant Convention (this is then Catholic Committee or Convention in
interest—the
probably,
of
representative
still
subordinate
we
own.
partial
tranquillity
1) It called
therefore,
but
people, tomorrow would
provisional
convocation with the
and
We,
whole
Reform,
as
well
the
is
Irishmen,
the
tomorrow,
of
Emancipation
cause
Catholic
that
our
of
protection
modification,
on
of
account
was:
and
our power....
all
any as
Untted
peace
the
If a Convention on connected with that
inertness—too
the
owing its relapse into impotence and to the whole body of the people
Universal
without
for,
necessary
Dublin. )...
3)
obtained
the
their
appears
the
4
as party,
it;
on
prosecuted,
owing
enfranchisement
Emancipation) ratify
was
has been franchise
no
society—to
when
Chairman,
Proclamation,
were
relaxation 2) Elective
freedom....
included
was
it.
this
formation
these
necessary
national
National etc.” This
arms:
Emancipation
Catholic
seditious
of
Irishmen.
Dublin)
wrote
of
representation.
legislature,
United (of
Drennan
to
Volunteers
the
Drennan
and
island; to your insignificance.
by Rowan
content
main
which the
answered
December,
all
into
insurrections,
may 15th
commit
of
the
February
inattention instigated
character,
and
by
the
and
risk
approaches....
Let
210
parochial
meetings
delegates;
let
Soldiers
school,
in
as
to bail. Northern
The
Declaration
Ist)
on
no
has
.
That
this
inferior
to
the
in....
7)
to
obtain
our
entreat
tion,
and
in
object
without
an
going
and
information
publishing
for
name
(the
other
the the
of
things:
(meaning
the
Kingdom
of
all its citizens. 4th) That without a cordial, steady,
a
unlettered African, is this most desirable
collect
radical
which
these
the
(natural
of
denomination in to a National
the
ever
for
live men)
Ireland, Conven-
most
the
Parliamentary
must
kingdoms
as to
people
complete
we
land
rights
thoughts
of
and
to
disgrace end
every
of their
sense
the
a
obtaining
the and
people of every denomination. 5) That have for upwards of a century doomed Catholics of this Kingdom, to a state
fellow-citizens to turn
to
order of
fencing
side-arms
says among
Kingdom
Scotland,
means
on
Jacobins
franchise to be obtained
elective
can never
little
England,
their
Declaration
persevering union of all the Irish the penal code of statutes which our fellow-citizens, the Roman
we
with
a
at
meeting
prosecuted
“Irish
return
Dungannon....
from
a
in
parish
government, inasmuch as the great mass of the represented in Parliament. 3d) That the people of effectually constitute their own laws, without an
extension of the elective franchise
That
was
the
each
declared
issued
arrested
Belfast,
let
MARX
national
are not can never
people Ireland
again
was
Volunteers
of
of
possible;
15 December, 1792. the “Irish Jacobins”’
of
Resolved
Ireland)
of
Address
society ) of Belfast” The Declaration
be
Tandy etc.) Rowan was
Star
and
as
address
corps
several
well as Napper December 1792
admitted
soon
Ulster
of
(This
etc.’”’
Dublin,
as
held
sense
the
Citizen
there, In
be
KARL
effective
an
reform,
remain
wretched
etc.”
*‘Address. of
It derived
says
stitution;
acting
more
among we
need
of
representing
interests,
and
tended to country.... be
say
liberated
renovated
a
such the
Jacobins
the
Public’’
the
representation
Ireland;
a government than
the
to
of
the
House
the
nation,
whose
etc.
principles and
shackles that
of
this
liberty
will
90
this
It
instead
by
English
be
have
and
divided
is
by
of
who
exertions
unhappy
Out
an has
indtviduals
influenced
tyranny....
con-
only
rights....
Commons,
baneful of
is not
no
authority
people)
are
perseverance of
his
defend
Irish
possesses
it
supreme
the
of
aristocracy vital
with
subject
voice
unanimity
from
case
the
(meaning
majority the
the
By
is
people
that
sap
to
Belfast
this
government: in power to oppress
5 miltons of actually return
Irish
other things: “Where the mode of government the people clearly expressed, that nation has
all
from
The
ever
wretched land
will
a
procuring
established
in
this
IRELAND
FROM
country;
AMERICAN
can
this
REVOLUTION
only
be
15
1793:
February,
Emancipation
and
Committee.
This
it
made
the
ciliated Irish
opens
Parliament.
a
the
of
the
of
that
the
carrying
crush
10
the
and
the
Volunteers.
against but
did
1793.
them United In
of
Bill,
while
but
con-
it
Westmoreland
The
This
was
moved
recommended
the
motives:
the
Custine had conquered battle of Jemappes (6
speech
military
militta.
spirit
Jones
the
the
He
was a
last the
also
stated
establishment,
to
echo
and
stroke
against
the
speech,
Amendment.
acquired
Todd
with
the
for
a
of
Address
trivial
Byrne,
negotiated
favour
Reltef
Lord
the Republic. not mention
Belgium.
of
increased
formation
had
Catholics Keogh,
annexation had
The
a
moved
Grattan
the
of
Protestants,
January,
fetters,
Government
recommended the
represent
in
r
conspiracy
Catholic
1792)
the
to
said
resolutions
English declaration of war against France,!86 the Rhine (21 October, 1792), Dumourier’s
November,
Conven-
Protestants
He
European
relaxation
the
complained of the discontent of Ireland, but said corruption, extravagance, and alien policy of ministers. of the invasion of Holland by France, but was silent
complained
about
to
let
a permanent
assisted
resolve
211
National
convened;
passed
named
the Catholics. House of Commons.
nothing
He
and
a
by
1801
OF
Convention,
Dungannon,
doubtless,
Ministry
already
Volunteer
met at Reform,
people,
UNION
accomplished
tion. The Roman Catholics are follow their peaceful example.” 1,250,000
TO
and
organisation The
successes
the
Government,
baseness
and
M’Cormick.
by
of
France
of their
[Catholic | aristocracy.
Catholic
Committee
Tone,
Wolfe
Catholic
Committee compensated
by
Supported
the
Irishmen.
to
opposition
Ministry doors
Protestant
got
exclusive
they
other with
the
stimulated the
Irish Corporations the Aristocracy (lay
they found the 11 January, was carried.
no
this
House
connexion raises
.
with
United
to
Dublin
of
Corporation
Irishmen,
division.
Catholic
the of
Out
address
the
against Emancipation, and they intrigued and clerical) of the Catholics. In Parliament Party. Amendment
Grattan’s
unpopular in the country.... its independency? ...More
become survive the
people....
this—the
from
the
and
relics of the old exclusion 1793: Curran supported
“Parliament has credit of Parliament have
and
bigotry
The
people
disunion
are
not
of
How than the
which
could the half of us
people
represented.
from
to
And
restore the Union wanted aradical Reform of the Commons.... Without them (the Catholics) the country cannot be saved. Give them no Emancipation....
qualified
a
ment, rejected
by
Early
* to
The
discontented in
the
Speeches
the
Irish
of
of
1793*
to
According
Davies the
hated
The
influence
January
A
people....
Right
Curran
on
an
Government,
Petition
Catholic
unpopular
(1792)
Parlia-
has
been
Administration.” unsuccessfully
January
Honourable
29,
resists
1793-—cf.
J.Ph.
Curran.
his
the
Attorney
commentary
—Ed.
212
KARL
motion
General’s
Hibernian
the
for
Journal,
committal
of
publishing
for
that
M’Donnel,
the
the
was
House
MARX
printer
of
not
the
and
free
independent.
a
obtained tation,
and
members
cities,
moved
together by
are
Whole
the
of
Catholic
by
manors.
this.
He
Question
to
consented
Proclamation,
Machinery
in Parliament
said: must precede
Volunteers,
1793:
to property;
are
state amendment.” the
Their
Reform,
that
place
an
without
Bill the
excluding
indeed,
that
the
The
Same
Act,
the
tion
Acts, 20,000
Military
in
in
of
the
immediate
Bill
‘(A
law,”’
The
smaller
This
1s
law
says
in
any
was
by
law.
in
1793,
for
(Cobbett.
)188
*
On
days
the
passed,
to
from
whole
admitting
all
the
State
the
after
Bill,
Relief
Correspondence,
rights
Offices,
a
and
declaration
passed
Gunpowder,
code of coercion 16,000 Militia.
Curran,
declares
to
number,
representations It
full and
the
Secret
the
and
Alien
Conven
Committee.
He
Bull:
fact
against grievances. misdemeanour in choosing
a
fact,
passed
and
conceded.187
10
in
Government
and
Parliament,
1829
of
was
university,
from
the
therefore
them.
Catholics
the
and
another drilling,
naming
the
of
which
Foreign
Regulars
Convention
tion.”’
Parliament
1793,
societies,
bar,
them
Bills,
Gunpowder
The Bill of 1793 was brought of war against France. *
any
and
requires
a
March,
without
Relief
franchise,
but
all,
from
The
the
and
11 military
forbidding
Catholics and
Militia
resisted.
the
of
April
the
were
Resolutions
got
300
of
But the Opposition had already ytelded to the Ministers Indemnity thetr violent Proclamations against the Republican Volunteers: they
had
of
the
of
“‘Resolued—That
state must be decided first.... Ireland feels, Reform her liberty is gone.”’ The Motion was lost by 71 to 153. for
Represen-
that
counties
the
Grattan
towns remaining 216
others
while
Finis:
victories)
Parltamentary
counties,
university,
people
French
among
Resolutions
and
supported
Curran
the
the
boroughs
representation “The
persuasive
returned
with
were House on
(so
several
84
only
returned
the
14, 1793 Committee of
January
On
a
bill
any
the
intended the
February
“‘not
to
no
body
act, think,
to
prevent
or
restrain
of
to
21,
an
put of
1793.—Ed.
may
end
the
of
Conventon to assemble in
framing
change
to
procuring
in
societies
a
promote
insurrec-
a power
delegate
to
them.
for
assemblies
to act for them producing of any
purpose
to
but
men
petition
According to the part of the people
persons for
that
people
to
Act it for the
a high purpose of or
petitions
anything formed
petition
is
other
established and
Parliamentary
forming, Reform.
IRELAND
FROM
Thus
AMERICAN
armed,
the
REVOLUTION
TO
UNION
commenced
Government
prosecuting and persecuting, and obtained time to time, and, after the truce of 1795, to an Insurrection and to the Union. 1794, The agitation continued. Volunteers, United Irishmen etc.) changed Irish
a secret
into
laboured;
the
and
French
Jacobin
their
of
and
Resolutions
Belfast,
Tone.
assist the there as an
was
He
betrayed;
laws
drove
body.
the
crusade
fresh
the
The
session
meet
but
has
The
for
the
in
time
first
suggestions discontented
agent,
put
arraigned
4 JANUARY,
Whig,
was
who
sent
by
1795
opposed to
him
Ireland. The men and the Pyrenees,
French
the
army,
causes
charged Reform
effect
com-
in
treason
(after
censured; if a to be sure, in
us not create
the
law
of
last
through
of
pacification
of
a
be
crime.”
END
OF
1795.
MARCH
who the
with
the
Bill),
and
carrying the
the rapid progress of the United Irishhad driven the Spaniards behind the
behind
prepared
THE
TO
are
armies,
Austrians and
to
meetings
.
Irish
Pitt,
(and
apparent
it
to
Insh himself
for
the
some
of
FITZWILLIAM
Ireland,
Emancipation
Catholic
York’s
had
such
do
still
by
1s flourishing.
LORD
a
cannot
they
declared
system
informer
From
delegation,
quarrel
Catholics
29 January, 1794, Curran as defender of Rowan: “But now, if any aggregate assembly meets, they are printer. publishes their resolutions, he is punished; nghtly, both cases, for it has been lately done. If people say, let tumult,
of
from
aroused
Government,
to
patriots, bethought themselves a separation. Rev.Jackson sent munication with arrest), hanged.
organised
conquered;
its
213
prosecutions against Jrishmen Society was
(Government The United
secretly
had
1801
OF
the
Rhine,
occupation
destroyed
of
Holland
the
Duke
of
the
winter
of
in
1794-95,
But
papers
from
Fitzwilliam
and
published
Lord
Carlisle)
Irish,
inflame
Fitzwilliam Ireland Catholics
and
to
very the
them,
was
and
one
when chosen
King’s and as a tool to
height
drive
of
popular. of
the
What
between
that
perhaps, on second thoughts, ford’s influence prevailed) has the
(correspondence
it is evident the him
them
most Pitt
expectation,
into
Pitt
Beresagitate
Rebellion.
indulgent wanted, and
was,
(this
by
was
landlords to raise
suddenly
of the
recal-
214
KARL
ling
to
Fitzwilliam,
would
throw
protection,
mingled
the whilst
the
conflicts
Pitt
them
into
into
horrors
the
of
sent
had
drive
Protestants
commotions,
arms
the
would
parties,
be
which
England
of
aggravated
Royalists to Ireland
Fitzwilliam
MARX
and
for
by
the
Republicans.
with
unlimited
powers. The
day
throughout
all
Irish
House
plausible
to
Ireland.
peace
arrived, The
day
he
was
quitted
proclaimed
it,
she
prepared
insurrection.
for
a
Fitzwilliam
the
of
were
the
Emancipation
a
voted,
upon
got
frenzy
An
£2
certain
1795:
January,
outdid
Grattan
Address).
supplies
22
Commons.
speech.
millions
classes.
was
Bill
was
loan
in
servile
a
read
Fitzwilliam
opens
Fitzwilliam
Ministers
time,
first
voted,
with
adulation*
and
but
(as
ample
Anti-Gallican
was‘recalled.
HI
B)
Lord
outrages.
The Chancellor, i.e.
was
by
by
almost
insurrectionary
assaulted, Clare (the Lord almost killed in his carriage. Mr.
his
1798
of July
were was
Secretary
replaced
afterwards
End
attended
Beresfords Fitzgibbon) Chief
Camden’s
—
was
arrival
Camden’s
Administration.
Camden’s 1795
April
Pelham
nephew
(Earl
Chichester)
(Lord
Stewart
Castle-
reagh). became
Camden
associations Yeomen. Irish
was
He House
Emancipation Fitzwilliam’s
now
Republic of
the
of
Catholics made
ready
An
one
to *
became
the
Davies
of
only
Down,
North
of
1795.
Second
May,
and
were
Catholics
Defenders
was
passed,
oath
of
Association;
wrote
“he
outdid
armed
the
that
title
Reading
of
the
to
in
or
making
ministers
of
Institution.
84. the separation party. An object of the United Irishmen. The Antrim, and Tyrone joined them
an
the
the
under
guardian
worst. Act
for
Insurrection
take
the
Protestants
of
Ireland
It was rejected by 155 recall was a triumph for
Presbyterians
multitudes
in
the 4
Commons.
amongst
popular
raised
considered
of
Bill
extremely
were
which
Leinster.
this
Ribbonmen.189 death another
in
At
the
loyalty.—Ed.
bulk
as
time
Both
penalty
allowing
Irish
for
the
did the
sides
any Lord
IRELAND
FROM
to
Lieutenant
AMERICAN
proclaim
REVOLUTION
counties,
power
troduction
troops
and
perpetrated
by
serve
to
sending
no
one
215
go out
could
establishing
succession. Tory Gentry,
the
or
leisure
the
their
villainy
tn-
dependants,
was
but
whole
facilities
the
Yeomanry
No half—or
at
houses, and Other acts—
and
bandittti.
pitch-capping,
navy—as
the
and
legal
Whipping,
in
case
of breaking into they suspected.
(Germans),
unprincipled,
them.
which
whom
Corps—followed each other 1n quick The Yeomanry consisted of the
undisciplined
1801
OF
magistrates guilty of any ilegality—giving of arrest without bail—licensing the
granting indemnity for Lord Lieutenant the of foreign
UNION
power
in
night; and magistrates obtained the transporting to the navy all persons
TO
hanging,
the
of
officer
allo wed.
1795.
was
Among
View
of Ireland,
“The whole
Established
exclusively,
senters.... lowest
change,
can
make
.
The
ers.
are
They
sentiments
etc. of
Acts the
so
bold,
situated
known,
proceeding
the
ignorant
First
were the
labouring
they
appeared
armed;
houses
they
make
excellent
.
but
one
All
Parliamentary,
whose
way
to
left
interest
in
change
most
the
soldiers.
have
The
Lords
Within various Defend-
make
their
Grand
Jury
to
is adverse
that
of 1793
Committee
United
the
Drogheda,
not
Assizes,
guilty.
James Weldon, connected House of Commons. February,
transportation
to
1796.
mostly
of
took
the
from
Meath,
and
April
The
Dublin
their
1793,
several
night,
forced
their
them
Cavan,
Defenders,
was
Insurrection
Bull
).
of
to
their
arms.
They
and
other
Monagnan
connect tried
to
of
way
them with trace them to
French gold. [Appearing] before 23, 1794, the Drogheda Defenders,
with them, February 3d,
magistrates
in
cause,
Catholic
lowering
April
in
Committee tried crown prosecutors
the
Association
Spring
Louth,
and
counties
cesses,
county
County
Secret and
Irishmen
declared
in
the
for
men’’,[fighting]
assembled
the
Gentlemen,
the
25
no
Ireland,
of
Dis-
people,
because
war.
tithes,
Protestants
of
soon through adjacent parts. The
spread
Catholic
North).
hearth-money,
from
rents.
were
by
the
them
poor
relieve
into
is
Anstocrats,
said to be Catholic. of information,
be degree
the
country
Revolution.
of
change,
peasantry
Aristocrats,
from
(in
Defenders
them
they
that
French
body
may
and
besides the
people.
describes ‘fas
that
and
the
any
whole
race,
engrossed,
honours of landed property.
great
for
Europe, a certain
hardy
have
and of
the
ready
oppressed and wretched in these 2 years have received insurrections,
Ireland
enemies
Catholics,
worse.
them
in
decided
ignorance,
of
possessions
Tone:
all the profits great share of the
Republicans.
degree
in Jackson’s
found
Churchmen
a very
and
any
to
adverse
by
patronage,
church
papers
the
(tt
gave
22,
December
hanged. 1796. Indemnity the
1795,
Bull. right
of
arbitrary
216
KARL
“It
Curran:
Bill
a
is
puts
which
Bill
the
the
for
liberty
rich,
and
poor
the
of
against
man,
of living but labour, in the discretion of where poverty [is] general, “‘it constitutes
men
Ireland,
of
therefore,
the
no
law
a
is
means
visible
In Ireland,” “Let the rich
magistrates? a crime.”
a
“‘What
poor.”
has
poverty they enact
when
fear
the
who
MARX
poverty,
against
enact a counter-law against riches.” “Gentlemen to prove that he who should be transported by this law would only be sent into an honourable retirement, where he might gain glory by fighting for his country from which his poverty had expelled poverty
lest
have
should
reasoned
him.” Irish
House
opened just
[the
till
with Brest,
reached
the
28.)
13
Commons.
at
assembling
expedition,
it
of
sitting
the
call:]
and
Wolfe
Bantry
October,
1796.
resist
invasion!
Tone,
on
Bay
also
War.
Camden
(Hoche’s and
Grouchy,
22
the
denounced
Camden
French
December
“popular
a
and
part
that
of not
did
passion
was
force
and
leave
popular
opinion”’.
Curran.
of the against
encourages
‘‘Government
every
most wicked at the scene
Catholics, and the their lives.’’ ‘““Look
upon
attack
and that
the
reputation
groundless prosecutions has been exhibited for 2
years
in one of your counties, of robbery, and rape, and murder, and extermination (of the Catholics). Law can give them no protection under a hostile and implacable government.”
was
Ponsonby’s Amendment Attorney General moved for have
been
on
enacted to take
like
occasions
in
to
149 Bill,
a
Then the such as
to
empower
to
England,
12. similar
the
Lord
as were suspected of treasonable practices. Leave being given, the Bill was forthwith presented, read a first and second time, and committed for the morrow. Lieutenant,
14 the
it
was
in
detain
was
It
1797.
January,
brought palaver,
in
Curran. “You beggar peasants; wealth they have? 24
when spirit
scourges under of
the
Curran. demand * The
the
of
etc.
the and
bribe
Lord
Leave
to in
especially
the
Pelham
Secretary
Lieutenant
full
English
of
expedition
Defence.
Sir
the
domestic
army,
of
and
how
the
Laurence
of
the
Ministers
Patriots
of
people—traitors
of payment,
the
this
moment
an act
of
Commoners.—é£a.
the
treason.
Parsons
especially
the
opposed,
the
Clubs
Hoche.
would
moved
Yeomen Address. turn
into
to their country and their oath, the compulston of discipline, and the
army. “At
few
Bill rejected.
Internal
increase
the
redress
a
in
minutes
Act.
Corpus all
have already laid a shilling on the brogues of your will you impose another shilling upon them? What Seven pence per day.”’
foresaw of
Habeas
Expedition.199
from
supported,
Grattan
party
Neither the
an
for
the twice,
Emancipation
France
1797.
February,
Address
infantry.
to
reference
of
read,
Hoche’s
a message
down
persons
all such
Suspension
granted;
morning after midnight. 17 October, 1796. Catholic
6
an
and
1796.
October,
bring
up
by in
defeated to bring
leave
gaols
are
crowded
.
they*
make
a
IRELAND
FROM
the
Since
proclaimed House
of
end
(put of
Lord
(Pelham
18,
to
still
disarm
1797.
“The
Curran.
your
denies the
the
natural
second,
against
We
ditto
laws,
the
the
their
of
determined
to
abandon
and
Government
strengthened
as
and
was
Orr ered
the
a
14
The
of
United
achievement 1792-93
Tone but
it
and the
of
an
Irish
of
consequent
labour
laws,
progress
of
a
gallantly
Ireland.
But
a
Ulster
its
both
were was
rapidly
the
of
the spread
was
The
the
The
Catholics,
French the
when
1791,
1794,
for
Reform. the
views
republic,
on
recall
it
the
penalty.
in
independent
first,
public delegaAct makes the
death
In
is:
religious
Parliamentary to
Parliamentary
objects.
administall
of
added
formed
when,
Newell,
Oath
of
any
(such
calumny.
(allegedly)
offence for Insurrection
and
an
(Bird,
men
The
face.
Irishmen
and
attainment
was
to
face
soldier.
among
unchanged, of
the
United
having
original
completed.
their
now
carrying
1791
desired
of
violence
testimony”
this
Emancipation
prospects
quarrel,
felony of
of
circumstances,
the
patronage,
the
a criminal purpose. The
retaining
who
for
suspension
their
of for
it
oath
Catholic
the
the
of
the
private
secrecy,
of
disappointment
coercive
he
and
who of
on
affection
Society
objects
a
to
of
to
such
Neilson, formal
1797,
Irish
obligation
increased,
organisation
“battalion
October,
Convention Law had made tion to meet for that administering
attend,
the
these
Irishmen
spies
prosecutions,
United
secondly,
an
jury
contest.
the
by
the
brotherhood
3dly,
Reform;
a
of
despotism
and
Under
United
itself
quarters, the
of
to promote distinctions;
the
others),
hanged
oath
first
complaint;
Commons,
party
the
administration,
intimidation.
free
to
continued
augmented
to
etc.),
The
Secretary.
the
of
or
of
constitution
Emancipation,
trusted
Maguane
House
Chief
minorities
Act.
defence
ceased
Opposition Castlereagh
incessantly
Government O’Brien,
the
the
own
Your
what?
petition
third,
in
Curran
parliamentary
and
and
profligacy
The
the
entire
Grattan. 127 to 16.
By
of
one
attaints
of by
Insurrection
right
the
powerless. The people looked to the United Irish to arms, to Revolution. The Government perstst-
Reform
soldiery—they Opposition
of
decreasing
daily more to France,
refusing
self-defence
power.”’
the
.
sufferers—the
speech
Lieutenant
Act,
with
1797.
discontented.
of
maintain
Constitution,
deeply
Grattan; the 3 July, 1797.
on
seen
to
Executive, in
it,
have
grew
the
Last
adjourned
struggled
ed
1797.
from
House
they
of
Ireland
of
together
March,
Amendment was rejected
Gunpowder
of
attempts
15,
secedes
is
13
Lord
Act,
right
power
the
the
May
North
217
counties
inhabitants
Belfast,
“‘The
Grattan:
Convention
1801
OF
1797: Disarming of Ulster. Message Secretary.) General Lake—cowardly,
province of Ireland of High Treason.’’ 20 March, 1797. The Amendment laws,
whole
the
Proclamation.
Lake’s
March,
is
UNION
siege).
of
March
Commons.
TO
1796
March
state
cruel—was
magistrates.
REVOLUTION
of
in
Camden.
infamous, 19
AMERICAN
the
In of
spread;
10
May,
of
Fitzwilliam,
the
accumulation
of
the
1795,
Alliance,
and
the
influence,
and
altered
the
natural the
218
KARL
whole
character
the
of
system spread to Leinster. So formally communicated with
on
Only
test
The
Society.
the
of
19
diverted
1798
February,
by
the
Lord
resolved
anything
more
made
of 1796 the organisamiddle of 1797, this
1796,
May
through
they
purpose
their
from
as
back
far
France,
was
Society
and less constitutional. In the autumn made military in Ulster. Towards the
decisive, tion was
MARX
“that
which
Executive
Edward they
could
not be Parlia-
would
be
had
Fitzgerald.
done
in
ment”’.
In
the for
reason the
order
so
not
leaders
sent were
And
quarters, tion.
the
a
an
again,
in
they
into
their
councils
was
arrested
a were
Thomas
[was
at
the
two it,
against
John
to
in
soldiers,
but
Bills
(packed) 25 other
1798, lives
*
they
without
Henry
and
and
on,
without
New
before
the
on
2lst
and
its
designers
17
July,
treason
negotiations Mr.
No
John.—Ed.
law
sorts
all
given
on
the
individuals.
legal
of
them
state
the
Cooke,
describe
implicating
was quarter was
Martial
of
struggle cottage,
every
opinions
secured
to
days
four
commenced,
1798. during the
closed.
the
were
began,
Warrant
concealed.
pounced
insurrection,
Burning
justice
July,
was
lay
McNevin,
A
to
Lord
defeat.
loyalists.
recorded
just
days.
12
McCann
trials
took
March
attainder
Their
hand,
could,
of
May,
on
France; Bond,
Dublin.
and
glided
O’Connor
them.
the
were
hanged.
of
19
On
insurrection
of
and
cottager—the
courts
ment.
the
insurgents
escaped
Kilkee
for
some
France,
for
Arthur
Oliver
for
insurrec-
for
wait of
embarking
Fitzgerald
its final
outbreak
he
replace
pressed
Rynolds
taken
to free
subjected
to
was
nothing
Still
people
including
insurrection
to
1798,
February
The
side.
the
time
announced
it.
of
but 1797 the militia Castle. The Northem
warehouse,
not
Monaghan
action;
of
weakness.
of
Bond’s
Lord
Thus
May,
the
Before
the
place,
without
23
On
every
take
act
the
Edward;
one
for
the
traitor
delegates,
were
Lord
the
wanted
Edward’s
Oliver
Sheares
Sheares.*
and
Castlereagh
place
at Sampson
Emmet
sleek
in
Leinster
of
Edward.
the
urged as In May 1797,
motive
transportation,
Lord
Maidstone,
seize Lord
1798,
it.
the
through of
to
of
and
to
soldiers
summer
the
was
French prevail.
not
sufficient
was
beginning
when
arrested
was
lead
the
burnings,
Emmet,
directory,
In
so
the
of did
four
as
offering
disposed
meeting
issued]
rising
Executive.
were,
thus
the
militias
outbreak,
Edward
coming but it
of
the
deputation,
for
and
etc.
by
whipping,
Lord
March,
execution
regarded
thought
regiments done.
the
for
was
militia,
1796-97, the insurrection;
winter of immediate
prisoners
behalf
United
by
of
Irish
Byrne,
the
not
treated
and
torturing
proclaimed, given
with
affairs,
either Juries
judges. the
Ministers.
however,
and
on
murder. the
as
GovernOn
the
so far as they was hanged:
a
IRELAND
the
from
for not
Instead
and
released,
till
cleared
unfit
Kildare
and
Treaty
days
act,
by
the
neither
were
they
“deputies
not
of
kept
only
United
Irish
which
they
in
gaol
whence
from
George,
219
They,
described
abroad,
Fort
here
were
they
1802.
in
rising,
first
Castle,
pardon,
Amiens,
of
the
from
go
into
the
compact.
the
craving
to
them
thrust
OF
at
July,
broke
1801
UNION
the
people
of
had
Wexford
county, with the exception of Ross @d Duncannon, to resist a skilful attack. Similar successes attended
their
places
the
29
TO
indemnity
guilt,
then
12
Within
their
allowing
of
a year,
on
Government
press, but by as confessing
leaders
REVOLUTION
settled
finally
The
gaols”.
their
did.
AMERICAN
was
compact
the in
FROM
two the
insurrection.
Antrim
similar
and
The
a
and
protracted
Wexfordmen assistance,
foreign
the
faith
the
plains The
but
of Meath, soldier
having
too,
General.
Courts-martial
slaughtered
[ it the
hanged
besides
and
German
own those
Most
spared
in
the
were
troops
the
of
also
in and
Attorney
and
courts-civil
insurgents did
died
assassin
the
of
the
loyalists
for trust
Ulster.
battle,
unaccountably
men
heroic
that
hope not
could
into
bow-string
taken
females,
English
these
way and
the
they
after
ousted.
a vague
from for
of
their
work,
]
there,
were
Presbyterians
partly
few
force
turnof
prisoners.
They
to
his
the
a
not
and
and
fortnight,
despair,
from
effort
done
was
brigand,
retaliate.
an
in
war;
the
more
still
persecutors;
their
of
did not rise for a shorter struggle, the
Down
blunders,
did
not
not.
employed
in
these
affairs. Pitt’s
to
Plan
Enforce
tariff.
1789—The
Prince
uish
the
Irish
assailed
Regent’s
to
used
and
and by
the
the her
terrify
other
and
200
years
Ministers
of
Elizabeth.
*
pp.
336,
See
It
under
colour
to
determined
the
minds
is
here
well
measures
various
authority,
expedient,
1798-99,
Pitt
of
exting-
men
of
out
of
worthy
of
reflec-
free quarters and martial law, the of all municipal courts of Justice, the discretional of the torture to suspected persons, executions In
application cold blood,
be
by
sense.
suspension
Ireland
Insurrection
Question
1798-99 and 1598-99: tion, that the exercise of
Carew,
the
Legislature.
1798—Rebellion
common
Provoke
was
1784—Independence commercial
and
were after
373—Ed.
officers
in
of
which Elizabeth
were
1598-99*,
again they
resorted had
Mountjoy
been
to
and
practised
in
again
judged
to
with
vigour
in
practised
by
the
220
KARL
United
Irish
Though
it
appeared,
full
and
that
their
the
Government
leaders
exasperate
the
Under Earl
did
nothing
Pitt’s
declared,
insurrectionary
Camden.
Carhampton
corrupted
the
the
some
this
He
deep
United
and
camps
on
insidious
of
suppressing,
excite,
an
insurrection.
to
the
the
of
the
by
them
some
North,
the
Lord
by
were
Dublin
withdrew
miles
Lieutenant
King’s sign-manual was at his camps, and bring back his
troops
and
publicly
Minister
was
was
on
counted
a premature
effect
and
Government
Pitt
prohibited of
therefore
marched
command,
was
garrison
refused
and
Irish
Mr.
he
obey. The break up
scheme
his
expressed
first
Although martial troops to intervene,
This
the
to
his
the
in
South
also
obeyed
resigned
instead
ordered
Irishmen:
measure
he
then
Government
Ministry, everything to
Ireland,
of
occurred.
troops
that
found
by
garrison;
barracks.
and
British
but
proceedings.
Carhampton
Carhampton refused to procured, ordering him
whom length the
inexplicable
movements
two distinct capital. This
formed
them,
Commander-in-Chief
with
wherever
from
the
Government Societies,
Administration:
Carhampton,
dissatisfaction law was not yet
and
suppress
the
Irish
to
known
fully
to
that
United
people.
his
daily
the
of
were
chiefs
Government.
documents,
information
and
Camden’s of
public
from
accurate
had
to
known
Societies
MARX
the
explosion.
in
into
Dublin
declared,
that
agitation;
for,
obviously
to
disposed
expertness of the Free quarters were
Irish
now
ordered
quarters
{ Free
masters
occasionally, with
all
parts
of
their
its
to irritate the Irish pretence of forcing
homes,
horrors,
throughout
to
the
soldiers
food,
measure
This
previous
exciting it
of
and
officers
their
families.
attendant
Ireland,
purpose
rendered
peasantry,
the
of
despotic
property,
was some
resorted
to,
the
best
of
insurrection,
and
and
for
the
under
the
}.
population;
were inflicted were goaded and
Tortures
Slow
the
confessions;
people
driven
to
madness. General
Abercromby,
not
who
permitted to disgust. {General
abate these Abercromby,
placed
command,
soon and
under be
that
his
more
much
he
was
Ireland exposed
to
subject.
The
was
effected
now
by
crime
to
formidable
not
would
means
those
people and
their
or
countenance
and
cruelties
could
an
as
succeeded
Commander-in-Chief,
was
enormities, and therefore resigned with in general orders, stated that the army from their state of disorganisation, would
no
longer
insurrection
free
to
reduced
to
than
friends
admit
a state
which
no
bear
their
was
excited.
to
their
enemies,
quarters.} nation
anarchy,
of
had
miseries.
ever Pitt’s
and been object
IRELAND
FROM
AMERICAN
REVOLUTION
TO
UNION
1801
OF
221
UNITED IRISHMEN AND PIT T. (POLAND AND PRUSSIA)}9} 1795
Until
sion
the
of
(1793
sqq)
there
the
United
people.
troduction
new
of
sent
Protestants,
Pitt’s
they
to
might
a
of
dupes.
Berlin
from
that
Clubs,
were
them
of
were
emissaries
Jacobinical
were
Irishmen
Many
At
Poland
minor
divi-
same
time
to
form
the
in
order
a pretext
offer
the
for
in-
armies.
r Exorbitation
the
of
Boast
Castlereagh’s
The
Irish
rebellion. sternation Habeas
and
dismay. Act
Prussia.
tormented,
To
raised:
these
North;
burning
were
who said
Cork
The
some such
of
this
Bill,
the
also
pitch-caps
Militia.
Still
in
ferocious
was
the
to
were law
some
bravos
was
the
Dublin
by
in
the
officers, the
of
It
North
Corporation.
distinguished
administered
the
were
Yeomanry.
by
Street,
attempto
Yeomanry
the
the
consigned
indemnified
the
rivalled
the
sunrise;
they
terrified,
Then
Militia
Marlborough
sunset
they
and
con-
Act,
outrages, particularly commanded by their
day,
invented
torture
and
being
Arms
for
from
seized,
Berlin,
The
were more
fret
home
actual
country in and exasperate,
the
Searching
deeds.
open
in
magistrates.
that
loyalty,
at
them
dreadful
houses
to
into
forced
involved
succeeded,
prodigious
committed
riding-house,
tant
of
outraged,
Fitzwilliam
Suspension
met
Ensor
perpetrators
the
be
persons not found at persons were shot because, when challenged, or Deing
many escape
to
is
to Lord
of
transport
further
ted
recall
Corpus
to
Bill
were
people
The
People.
Protes-
for
scourge
the
and
triangle.
Union;
bodies
as
they
rebellion; explode.
IN IN
seize,
Castlereagh
charged
THE
that
BRITISH
ORDER
TO
had
Castlereagh
Reform.
made
him
Ditto
by
been
explode.
1793
in
and
for
in preparing
the
British
phrensy that
he
had
as
as
fired
it.
well
PARLIAMENT
1797,
IN
THE
reformer
in
He
declared,
Grattan’s
OF
IRISH
Ireland
1792,
motion
for
OF
for
was
the
THE
the and
grasped This
made
DEFENDER
MEASURES
Irish
irritated
despair,
enemies.
boasted mine
the
Ministry,
and
their
defied
PREVENT
CASTLEREAGH,
office
uncommon
not
deluded
tormented,
could
and He
PITT
Irish,
of
tortured,
inflamed,
arms
were
executions
Summary
such called
conspiracy
UNION,
PACIFICATION.
PARLIAMENT
as for
Pitt Irish
in
England,
till
Parliamentary
Parliamentary
Reform.
When, lo! the Ministry of Ireland was changed and Camden succeeded Lord Fitzwilliam. With the change of men Castlereagh’s opinion of Reform was upset. In 1797, the serpent, the viper, and snake made
222
KARL
another
a
he
feat:
proper
Union,
declared
time. and
Yet
the
The
has
extinction
of
the
reign
Union.
with
interfering
years
during
such
was
machination
independence
Ireland’s
of
the
of
talking
in
and
independence
the
of
In Irish
French
the
end
the
of
this
his
rhetoric,
on
discussion
Parliament’’.
ruin
when
swollen
of
meditated
and
debate
the
one)
wickedness
time
with
deprecated
the
the
very
the
defended,
of
at
Reform
customs,
ancient
prudery,
“‘he
the
prodigious
At
Parliament.
1795,
against the
of
political he
of
scheme
country.
his
of
Ireland.
completing,
Fitzwilliam,
violation
of
plan the
Parliament
orders
verbose,
digested
completed
thundered
while
constitution
well
British
(Pitt
Pitt,
and
nearly
Parliament
the
prerogative
of
fundamental
Lord
in
terror
of
the
wise
he
Pitt
prepared
a
for
then
MARX
the
the
recall
as a
manifest
years
Two
of
later,
wn
1797, when Fox proposed to address His Majesty on the best means tranquillise Ireland, this W. Pitt objected “on the inconstitutionality, the impropriety, and the danger to be apprehended from the interfer-
to
ence
the
of
impostor
British
posed,
through
Union
Parliament
any
deprecated
with
its
in
agonies
and
was
there
Americans, India,
Cornwallis’
1798
sqq)
(There
he
Lord
during
was
he
of
Ireland’s
Ireland”’.
This
prosperity;
to
confusion,
Lord
its
effect
flagitious
pro-
he
for
incorporate
Administration
Castlereagh
The Then
affairs
for
Britain.
Great
(August
the
the
means
Union
further
War
Secretary.
thrashed
Independence.
of
qualified
incorporated
man
the
Cornwallis,
their
Chief
Trick
for
As
a
destroying
Tippoo
Sahib
for
by
a governor
nation’s
for
right.
the
East
Pitt
and
India
Company. )
was
Cornwallis
In
the
commonly
Stewart,
India
Lord
Cornwallis
a peace
cluded
agent
intermediate called
which
between
Robert
Castlereagh.
had
defeated
Tippoo
only
increased
the
con-
but
Sahib,
necessity
of
future
Cornwallis
at
York-
wars.192 19
October,
1781,
capitulation
of
town. Quietness whilst
men,
he and
was he
was
almost
deceiving roused
the
restored. both
Cornwallis
parties.
Royalists;
one
He day
affected
encouraged he
the
destroyed,
impartiality, United the
next
Irishday
IRELAND
he
was
AMERICAN
through
gave
the
and
effected,
REVOLUTION
system,
His
merciful.
Everything
effect.
was
FROM
however,
reason
to
impression
he
no
had
TO
a
horror
of
time
to
for
him:
alone
lose,
lest
1801
OF
225
not exactly the anticipated restoration of tranquillity, it
had
expect
UNION
an
that
Union
country
the
might
could
be
recover
its
reason. A
accident
fortunate
by France to landed about Ireland).* bishop
clothed, them
a
and
entered
They
garrison with just arrived.
staff
had
the
destined
surprising
oppositfon,
royal took
the
visitation. They unarmed, un-
French did their best to render country. Lord Hutchinson com-
the
into
and of
the
Castlebar, a few miles from Killala. His force good train of artillery. General Lake with his The French attacked them. Ina few minutes, the
army
was
peasants
Races A
of Castlebar. ) The considerable part
were were
an armament,
of
a
some
not
of
without
But
marched
the
numerous, of
Killala
undisciplined.
was whole
portion
a company of parsons who were on their by a considerable number of peasantry,
efficient.
manded
A
the Irish insurgents, had escaped the Irish cruisers, 1,000 troops at Killala Bay (in the North-West
They
and joined
were
aid
possession
completely routed. About 900 of Castlebar.** (This battle
English fled in full haste to of the Louth and Kilkenny
finding it convenient completely equipped
to
Tuam. regiments
joined the French riflemen.
and the
(militia),
victors, and in one About 90 of these
retreat,
as
French is called
hour
men
hanged by Cornwallis afterwards at Ballynamuck. The defeat of Castlebar, however, was a victory to the Viceroy; it revived all the horrors of rebellion, which had been subsiding, and the desertion of the militia
regiments
England Lord
by
profiting the
the
protect
this
was in
and
march
French
continued 20,000
too
the long
troops,
the 42
at
certain of conquering 900 men. With directly to the [Shannon ]*** to prevent the
insurgents
with
had
his
enemy.
After
some
which
led
the
in
now
Horrors Killala;
*
and
On
were
Cornwallis after
August
everywhere
marched
a
sanguinary
22,
1798.—Ed.
** On August 27, ** * The manuscript *#* ** On September
1798.—Ed. is damaged 8, 1798.—Ed.
in
at
from
Dublin,
Lord
he
ready
to
Cornwallis
at
considered
himself
above 20,000 men, thepassage, but he
to
French
which
they capitulated at Ballynamuck.**** afterwards to France. multiplied.
active
the
source
Castlereagh, by the slowest to increase the public terror,
skirmishes,
that
assemble
to
and
Castlebar,
pretty
outmanoeuvred:
were
prepared
miles
collected
river, and it was fen days before marches, which tended purposely
idea,
metropolis.
length
marched
an
with
insurgents
were
them only
upon
gentry
the
of
Westmeath,
French
The
impress
the country. supine, and
40,000
victory;
Wood,
Crooked
join
to
tended
alone could Cornwallis
the
They
sent
recommenced;
against conflict
the in
here.—Ed.
were
French
were
streets,
still the
that
possible reached
victorious,
Dublin
executions
peasantry, the
to
of
he
was
masters town
and
were of
was
224
KARL
some
taken: the
on
were
point
unexpectedly the
as
so
they
or
days
much
prepared
in
the
of
were 30 very
was
fully
consummated.
inducing
for
THE
now
Pitt
the
effect
conceived
his
of
And
of
Ireland
to
the
terrific horror,
and
throw
Pitt’s
of
the
terror, on herself into
public
step
first
to
project
UNION
that
moment
the
measures
previous
new
of
to act, to the
either
them
was
climax
allowed
days,
leaving
interval days
the
country.
protecting
This
terms
30
them
slaughter;
for
armistice
any
without
gave
interval.
counted
arms
and
and
achieved
the
the
armistice,
be
of
now
had
hanged, and the whole district was subjection, when Cornwallis most
disperse,
proper
30
the
Government
which
arms
thought
loyalists;
to
freely
their
they
an
proclaimed
insurgents
surrender
slaughtered, many being reduced to
of
MARX
to
had
to
arrived
a
promote
try
Legislative
Union. The
Irish
were
Peers,
under
for
anything.
ready
Episcopacy.
of
Dixon,
1798,
on
22
were
in
measure
The Throne
on
against
900
The
an
neutralised
Bishop had
scruples and
Waterford,
on
commenced
was
Union
of
the
22
May,
40,000
proposed.
British
proposed
first
1799.
January,
was
Frenchmen,
indirectly
Lord
by
evidently
more
intended
the
from
Speech unexpected
Cornwallis’s
warfare
terror
for
than
victory.
for
The King.s title Ireland, Defender
and
Amiens
was
and
annihilate
the
moment
King
etc.
created
offices,
county
a
with
£600-700 The
Britain, France, dropped on
of Great France
was
of by
The
only
to
was
the
bar,
bankrupt
of
which
months
pretence established
debate,
on
January,
in
try
the
Legislative
and
under
he
of
revived
furnishing
new
32
to
resolved
commissioners,
two
others,
to
Legislature.
check
number
judge,
Parliamentary
23
January
open
sale
second
continued defeated.
Irish
come promote a have
each
offices,
of
each. first
o’clock
local
to
measures the
Clare’s (Fitzgibbon’s) corrupt. He doubled the
one
III, Faith”
Peace,193
Union,
some
the
“George
of
Pitt now conceived effect of his previous
of
Marly,
despotism,
Chancellor’s
Ireland.
was
22
Lord
translation
of
rebellion
1799,
January,
then
lure
exceptions:
Down.
of
the
Clare’s,
The
Single
Bishop and
troops
Lord
till In
(22 of
a
debate,
late
every
in
hours).
certain which
the
debate
The
Fox, began
morning
upon
22
that
1799,
lasted
obtained
Government
a
till
11
majority
lawyer.
at of
5
o.clock
the
measure,
of
24,
the
it
was
23
January,
Government insisted
upon
1799,
was that
IRELAND
FROM
AMERICAN
REVOLUTION
Parliament
was
incompetent,
Union.
this
sense
In
since
Lord
chequer, of
the
Chancellor,
Bushe,
Irish
House
Lord
of
John
Parnell, Justice,
the
225
question
Attorney then
1801
OF
entertain since
Chief
and
other
upon
worked
a
UNION
the
Oriel,
the
of
Chancellor
Lord
resubmission
Parliament; and that Germans, to immolate fuel to the insurrection. to
fraud
upon
betray
Speaker
showed
by
the
to
those
by
irrefutable
English
facts
that
to
Minister,
shackles
which
from
for
the
then
existing
of 23 George and expressly
Act Ireland, 24
January,
1799.
216.
night
House The
on the
for
Irish
111
not
22
lay
inattentive
in
Government
the
by
initio,
anda
the unqualified contracting that
independence of it should endure
decided
against
Union,
answer
to
the
of
Lords
into
The Parliament
gave
and
cause
as
retrograde
deceived. cajoled,
Mr. should the
1801
in
Pitt, not
by be
Chancellor,
petitions
the
the The
of
for.
Viceroy’s
The
defeat
importance
they
into
the
themselves the generally
were
were
who
to
returned
the
new
50.
amongst
division
were
the
Members
was
the
the Catholics promising certain him. Never yet did any clergy
on
Hierarchy,
Catholics
not
subserviency.
exceed
of
had
the
corruption. A and distribut-
went
assuming to Bishops
Catholic
the
of
Ireland.
of
persons,
but
Government,
Compensation,
opposition,
Catholic
the
an
them
Cornwallis flattered priests bowed before
1798
In
old not
did
strongest
The
Catholic Question. emancipation; the
the
interest.
Temporal
disgusting the
of
1797,
in
105
the
of Lord Annesley etc. prove their 1 )2 millions levied upon Ireland,
Spiritual
most
the
members
in
prostrate before to their own
Cornwallis coquetted with of ‘“‘Catholic Leaders’.
deceived
1799,
January,
Commissioners
Castlereagh’s
pockets
to
added
of Parlia-
84.
Commons
expected. The accounts great proportion of the
ings
ab
had
Union.
Lords
were
Members
Absent
Lords
of
voted
leaders
so
nullity
released fostered the Irish
constitution.
III ‘‘recognising stipulating and
that
Address
title
a
itself
spirit
ever’’.
Voted
ed
tn
Union
of
the
the
mercenary
introduction of foreign and Irish, instead of extinguishing, Then great point: the incompetence Act
the
terrify
the the
trust.
its
Ex-
then
of the Volunteers and the nation had but a few years before them. It was argued that the insurrection, first organised and by Pitt, and protracted by Cornwallis, had been suppressed by
ment
the
of
Plunket
General,
Commons.
Parsons
country had been Irish gentry into
to
Saurin,
Sir
since
Lawrence
Sir
even
spoke
TO
hanged,
that
occasion.
1799
in
Corruptly
caressed,
in
1800
discarded.
private then
dispatch
pressed,
overhauled
any
against
this.
further
at Dublin over the fire amongst the
to
unless
Cornwallis,
a
majority
There
discussion.
were As
desired of
that
was
50
thousands
a
punishment
rejection of the Union, the people, of whom a few
the
measure
certain.
of
addresses for
the
Clare,
and rejoic-
soldiers were ordered were killed and some
wounded. It
8-226
appears
in
full
proof,
that
in
proportion
to
their
respective
226
KARL
numbers,
the
1/4 more Ireland at
corrupted, any period.
British
at the period of the Irish and influenced members
Commons,
corruptible,
5 and 6 February, 1800. Union accepted Castlereagh compelled even felons in the English
generals,
recollection
to
fail
its
of
have
a moment
at
who,
was
execution
own
their
artillery,
doors
the
of
In
the
when
martial
step
by
address
as
the
old
had
breathing-time
tremble
for
their
the
every
so
Member
a seat
purchased to him, by
or
ment, pensed service;
returned; in
the
others,
for
their
in
other
country;
it
secured
had
asmall
the
After
and
its
effect;
majority
debate
8
of
on
an
his
the
the
Parlia-
should
bank
of
meeting
the
of
A
made Parliament
of
to this
were,
corruption.
Parlia-
recom-
devoted
publicly
had
repaid of
fully
measure
of
never
be
for
who
money
be
who
£15,000
Members
should
this
a motety
cash
Member
all
Union,
was
the
nobleman,
in
purchase
that
supported
Union
of
continuance
every every
£1,500,000 the
insure
paid,
that have
by
above
the
be
thirdly,
before
freeholders
of
the
taken.
that
first,
to share in treasonable
other,
so
tion
Rogers towards
Parliament,
was
should
should
losers
and
to
measure
Ireland;
losses; and that terms, all who
pretence or flagitious
some
in
were
who
and
secondly,
Parliament
Treasury
Major
the preceding session, and importance; some desperate
necessary
support. Now an unparalleled Castlereagh publicly declared, returned Members to Parliament,
and
new
the
patronage
their
ora
existed,
Anti-Unionists.
after
became
Government
law
six-pounders
gentlemen
and
patrons
to
began
the
between
two
place
where
of
fresh
over
as to
far
to
assembling
interval
mentary
so
House,
Court
were
county
gone
had
had
that
by Irish House of Commons. gaols to sign Union petitions.
peasantry; tried to procure addresses to Parliament. Mr. Darby, High Sheriff of King’s County,!94
the
Union,
than
in every memory, could not proclaimed districts and bleeding
still
influence
MARX
under declara-
in he
any had
members.
1800, he performed his promise, and brought in a Bill to raise 1 % million of money upon the Irish people, nominally to compensate, but really to bribe their representatives, for betraying their honour and selling their country. George [II gives his assent to a Bill to levy taxes for the compensation of Members of Parliament, for their loss of the opportunities of selling what it was criminal to sell or purchase. The Union Bill but feebly resisted. The divisions of January and February 1800 reduced the success of the Government to a certainty.
Lord
till
received
Shannon
The
Marquis
of
Lord
Clanmorris,
Lord
Belvidere,
Sir
Hercules
15
January,
past
ones.)
10
Langrishe 1800.
o’clock
cc
a
beside beside
on
his patronage
for
wo.
Ely
his
cc
cc
British
we
2...
16th.
from
(60
in
we
ccc the
the
Commons
eee
wees
£45,000
.........--
£45,000
.....---++ees-e00.
£15,000
peerage
douceur
Speech
the
in
eee
ee
Throne,
members
the
absent.
ee
nes
debate Not
£23,000 £15,000 proceeded
governmental
IRELAND
5
FROM
AMERICAN
next
February
British
REVOLUTION
division.
were,
Parliament,
The
a
after
TO
Union long
UNION
115,
The
was
peace,
keeping The
43.
majority
House
in
to
fact,
Bishops
(273
laid
Troy,
the
by
terror.
Lanigan,
and
move.
not
secret
ed
Besides
smuggled
into
the
1 2
the
money
service
Irish
million
the Country. By the subjugation ing but an accumulation of debt, ment, an embarrassment in her the
integrity
but
the attainment of the Castlereagh palpably
ever.
discusston
the
the
of
Empire.
1800,
in
and
More
The
[members
years.
few for
How the
If
ever?
tution,
to
]
has 25
the
was
Parliament
Viceroy,
also
had
and
the who
unbound-
were
officers
of
Constitution
a
gained nothto her Parliaprogressive danger to has
been
acquired,
been removed farther than Members before the second of
votes
50
carried
the
in
favour
of
Union.
Union
were
Parliament
own
their
the
promoting Catholics
the
Union
difference
about
of
England has of venality
of
Castlereagh
Irish vote
they
Irish
not the the people.
why
made
the
of could
a
made
Pitt
away
and
name
The
the 158,
by of
clerks
vote
councils
substance purchased
which
Thus
Government.
an
of
11
pretence
by
Castlereagh
Ireland, accession
of
at
Motion
the
deluded
British
to
Parliament
the
Regiment. )
others,
England.
from
by
House
night,
under
(British
sold their country, and basely betrayed their flocks, Union. The rebellion had terrified the great body could
the
Castlereagh’s
military,
excite
passed
before
entire
227
present. )
members
surrounded
as
propositions,
speech,
Commons by Castlereagh. After a debate of ensuing morning, the division took place. Members 300, absent 27, rest 273. For
against
1801
OF
only
delegates
dissolution
authorised
to
and
destroy
a
for
extinction the
Constt-
not pass a royal law? No appeal was This was done in Scotland195; they did not dare Even the rotten boroughs sickened at the sound. Why
English?
doing it in Ireland. The Irish Parliament of The Union was carried other hand, the Resolution
presence
the
“that
Parliament,
open
defiance
There the it in
to
1801,
United The
be
a in
of
high
of
was
rebellion
was
a
is
the
infringement
laws
Martial 1798,
it
considered
and
Act
of
the
of
the
liberty
of
the
subject,
and
an
constitution\”
Law
Bill
was as a was
renewed
act of 1800 Parliament, without the
Union with England sions of Monk. The
Re
1800 was elected in 1797 for 8 years. during the reign of Martial Law! On the of the English House of Commons in 1741: armed soldiers, at the election of members of
in Ireland
continuance
any
from
1799,
continued,
of for
in
the 1800
former
a very
commencement revived,
act
but
passed
short
time,
in
of
in
fact
1799; by
the
inquiry!
ts an Act of Conquest (Ensor). treland’s Cromwell's scheme. It was among the deluEnglish Government had no other object when it Union
was
KARL
|
228
MARX
effected the Union, which means the extinction of the Irish Legislature, to deprive Ireland of its political consequence and authority, and subject her property and people to the mercy of England. but
The that
English
Norway,
Ministry, by
its
in guaranteeing
union
with
to
Norway should
Sweden,
stipulated
Sweden,
an
enjoy
independent
Parliament. !
as
Just
so
had
to
us
the
Lord than
Union
Ireland
of
Despite
Rogers in
The
actually Dublin,
people
in
The
a
result
rejected
an
of
the
election.’’
Union
by
with
The
was he
English
Government
was
the
resumed
elected
many; vent granted
us
offered
in his pensions for
the thrice
to
a seat,
vacate
place. Offices added; endless increase im
of
succession
a
projected
etc.;
the
Counties
the
Carlow,
King’s
Armagh,
Antrim,
Waterford.
counties petitioned opposition.
them.
against
a mere
Though
They Union.
Tipperary,
Westmeath,
Tyrone,
and Major
Drogheda,
in
Longford,
Meath,
fictitious
borough
House
of
had
Commons
to
of
conthe
1799
in
105!
or vacate your seat! administered in every form to with
assembling,
system, and secondly the annalist remarks: ‘‘through of others, it had little more than the
of
Corruption
Vote
chosen
Limerick,
Down,
and and
terrors
Yet
to
111
of
Cavan,
cities
its election (a mere farce), for sternation of some, and hostility formality
a
Belfast,
Wicklow,
coincided
as
their
Pontadown,
Kildare,
Mayo,
Commons first
of
were
at Birr, where county meeting.
rumour
Kilkenny,
in towns, spite of all
1799.
sheriffs
against
Wexford,
Leitrim,
Donegal,
Irish
towns
the
Fermanagh,
population measure, in
representation,
Security.
Though
Carrickfergus,
Counties,
Louth,
Thus the that fatal
be
Suspension
during
Commons
cannon the mere
Limerick,
Cork,
the
Popular
universal.
marched with in 1759, on
assembled
Queen’s
Clare,
to
Petitions)
and
for
of
as
Monaghan,
Galway,
and
necessary, no more dear
declared
ought
though the military opposed they met and protested, as
Maryborough,
Dublin,
of
was
indignation
petitioning, them; yet
Newry,
House
(and
Law
Guarantees
Ditto
Popular
Meetings
Martial
all
of
met
was
England
“Hampshire
Hanover.”’
Popular
obstruct dispersed
with
declared:
Grenville
that
etc. in
1800
the
measure.
Merciless
flagitious
Open,
wretches.
a more
Mr.
Edgeworth
granted simply, promises. The Church vectories friends
and of
The
or
might
divided afforded bishoprics
members,
bribe
relates
person
convenient
were
prostitution; to clerical
profligacy.
bribery!
that be
among a great were
advocates
IRELAND
FROM
the
for
Union.
at
exposed by
in
re-election
were
a
division
Yet,
after this expectancy, {discussion],* in a
a
counties,
[boroughs].*
A
Parliament; dismiss
Act
as
Union
of
The
Just
opposed
(Pitt)
Cornwallis
the
from
Yet
Cornwallis.
accepted
the
the
King
wanted
the
for
to the
Irish
III,
that
Ireland;
that
on
my
in
The
any were
but
that,
that
the
manuscript
with
make his
to
no
the
in
corruption,
with by
to
the
me,
Lords
pleasure,
individuals,
an
the
and
I could
with
a
by
and
here.—Ed.
for
show.
Catholics. declares
that
Union
the
He
re-entered
Kenyon,
are: message
joint
Gentlemen,
not
He
1801,
without
Ireland
established
mere
the that
that would
Catholics.
1,
February
to
was
favour
Lord
to
pretext
the
to
following,
concessions
Bonaparte.
any
Fulsome Kilkenny
the
on
This
Catholics.
Pitt,
damaged
for
sitting
from
further
Concessions
the
216
and
from
from
resignation,
believing
as
is
seen
Union,
Union
borough-
Lanigan
be
truce
to
uniting
will
published
I told
the
emancipation.
full
stipulating
to
by
Them
Bishop
as
transmitted
I would
them
in
the
further letter
in
borough-
Traitorous
Joined
to
as
to
voted
the
member small part of
who
during
letters,
his
inclination
a trust, *
assent
Parliament,
of
occasion,
to
his
to
was
for
University,
Higher
III,
without
course,
of
prompt payment, and to the Union, in the first whom 84 only returned for
Few
and
handed
in
preclude words
clergy
word
the
for
England’s
Ireland!
of
the
of
promised
minister
Ministry
propositions
Houses
his
be
inclined
ever His
2801
not
kept
George
was
m
Commons,
Hierarchy
the
George
the
Statute-Book?
as a means
Union
not
afterwards he
King
Pitt
Catholics.
had
Lords,
from
a
a
bribery,
Catholics
Catholic
made
fmongers],*
the
disqualifies
Catholic
address
of
and
Punishment
Class
Bench,
moved
places
instalment,
first
Commons,
and
the
corruption,
cities,
from
in
were
Compensation
a
was
of of
be
alone
borough-mongers
simple bribe shall not such
and
the
House
counties
to
Union-bribe—£622,000 [as]*
minority
to
writs
borough
overwhelming
endless the
the
new
35
other
paid,
to
[England | *
of
were
concessions,
were
accepted
the
of
and
229
title.
had
1801,
in
£622,000
Only
mongers
the
1801
OF
advanced
placemen
1800,
who
Parltament
holders!
superadded
and
UNION
navy, boards were to be
superior
Union
Lords,
grand
United
the
the
TO
Commoners
a
with
members,
The
obtained
lawyers
Parliament.
of
of
Minister!
and
mart;
relorded
numerous the year
So
the
the
be
REVOLUTION
army
Union
away to
Lords
that
The
the
voting
and
AMERICAN
delay,
help
was
‘‘When from
on
sent forward
acquamting
principally
churches
of
the
the both that them them,
founded
two
king-
2 30
doms
to
would
the
ever
for
Roman
shut
the
The
the
Pitt
was
1782,
Ireland.
etc.)
Union;
ing
the
and
be
became
he
every
In
ablest
1799.
as in
1802,
that
House
Forster
purchased ac[t
Lord
by
]*
of
Irish
Holland: it
by
Lord
enactment,
who
stronger
rather
soon
and
after
upon
that
the
entertain the question of Chancellor), Sergeant Ball,
insisted
the the
Ireland,
of
Moore,
have
a
is
George
The
The
Plunket
Commons.
(Solicitor-General
said
for
of
ruin
manuscript
to
of
the
of
House
use
of
mere of
that
nullity,
Commons
public
money
for
votes
for
Union.
said and
that
“these
placemen
English
Liberals
on
Union
were
who,
1t
was
which
in
debating
said,
is
irrevocable,
Union)
particularly
the
Union
with
thickening prerogative.
King of
Britain.
damaged
corruption. the
was
This
preparatory
opinions
to
of
all
Reform”’.
speaking
Great
the
the
incompatible
Peers, the
(by
parliamentary
Parliamentary Irish
the
injured
increased
“that
is
United
made
Commons
Radicals
strengthened
Tierney
the
in favour
English
of
[you] *
Cabinet)
in
Holland,
borough,
would
of
(Ensor. )
”’
Representative
Lords,
*
becom-
After
Chancellor of the Exchequer, the then Speaker of the (Irish)
borough-mongers
affords
wished
The
it
legislatwe
corruption”’.
Nation!
means
foreseen
that
a
constituted,
scepticism.
in
Prime-Serjeant
had
votes House
and
Ireland
his
himself;
was
it
then Oriel,
Ireland,
Opinions
of
people.
but
as
well
declared
in
1806,
May,
the
those
Irish
repeated
declared: ‘‘I tell you are, you pass this Act, zt will be a Ireland will be bound to obey tt.”
obtaining
of
were
“The
tts
thus
the
measure,
Addington
Castlereagh,
purpose
the
as
Fitzgerald,
Irish the
no man
Grey,
by
exact
declaration,
son
John Parnell, Justice, Lord
under
May,
against
to
of
Commons.
that
Union
on
afterwards
that
Ireland,
of
circumstanced
1802
a
of
Parliament,
incompetent by
incompetent, even to Saurin, Plunket (since Lord
Ireland
7
he
same
upon
debate
January
and
two successive Attorney-Generals place in Parliament, declared that
was
of
principal in
binding
his
usurpation
-General.
judge, Sir since Chief
House
the
for
lawyer
a
since Bushe,
if,
the
Attomey
Parliament Union. So
for
made vouched
the
Clonmel,
England,
made
never
he
General,
Plunket
as
terms,
statute,
Lord
(afterwards
representatives
any
constitutionally
Attorney Mr.
Irish
that
not
respect
Union
resisting
of
in 1800, by Saurin, in his
William
considered
with
measures
further
the
of
Scott’s
declaration
repeated
Mr’
would
Legality
Attorney-General’s
of
MA RX
Catholics.”’ On
agent
any
to
door
K A RL
the The
ranks
the
of
whole
House
peerage
of
is Patron. the
It
Union has
here.—Ed.
before
ruined
both
it
was
enacted,
England
and
IRELAND
FROM
Ireland.
The
AMERICAN
subjugation
taxable
commodity.
Canning
promised,
new
by
when
Ireland
nation.”
is
(Barrington.
)
nection
with
the
a
no
had
“‘He
due
doubt
but
execution
the
of
60,000 regular troops, England, and produce
of
to the
aid
of
to
pay
to
nearly
collect
revenues,
9
our
Angry
safety!
enjoy when to
Irish
their
island
they
will”....
would
9
Why,
“It
will
as
long
sooth Ireland! them
in
her
in
will;
maugre
true
and
all
burthens
of
very
officers
the
of
‘friends
government
not
be
have
5
a
have
still
we
they
desire
keep alive, as I before
millions
them;
of
them
may
wish
live,
with
who
really
whose
silly
hear
and
for
heads
as
long all
and
live
as
them
it
in
they
see
pay
to
desire
base
desire
and
hoods
please,
not
will
their
seem and
feel
and
the
cloaks
to
impostors
do.
Ireland!
devices,
present
Ireland! herself
to
shape.”’
to
and
is
her
pressed
empire.”
downward
([Ireland]
by
the
pays
five
England. )
by
maintained
been
was
which
1811:
but,
the
‘“‘thought
only
and
angry
be
nation,
foundations
etc.
alive,
but,
to
miserable
England
(Ireland) carried on
could
as
their
its
absentees
our
with
lightning.”’
their
but
formidable
with
She be
of
able
a year,
1807,
of
curse
sea;
Ireland;
may,
for
and
[be]
of
about
and
February,
hide
fears,
now
body,
as to
dependence
be to desire to ’’.... “We may,
us!
themselves;
may
they
to
and
20
of
are
useless
English
to
spite
Curran: blood could
millions
millions
Corpus assistance
1809: “‘Angry with the existence endangers
must
the
of
thunder the
They
“Ireland
accumulated
3
of
their
they
them
as
Register,
cowardly
will,
Ensor.
with
regard
they
their
the
valuable
Bill
because
hate
bottom
with
must.
they
mouth
Habeas
and
pensions
because
Irish,
may
to
frustrated
truth
West
custom-house
December,
because
the
infamy
deceived be
them,
therefore,
Political
an
“What
in
a
the
and
those Irishmen be dangerous
the
is,
angry
be
Cobbett.
be
with
to
sunk
to
be
the
con-
in
in the
of
or
2
/nsurrection
what?
be angry with to be alive, we
continue
annexing
1807,
a revenue,
salaries
Register,
Sad dogs alive may
life! keep
observed,
as
the
with
because—because
to
to
the
the
99
connection
Irish;
and
of freedom.
to
law,
become
peace,
the
unlimited
forms
words
borrowing
keep
followed
and
disturbances
would
in
was
Union
February,
considerable
to
in force in 1809: Cobbett. Political
still
so
which
minor
with an entire repeal statutes for martial
Newport,
a mere
a torment
ironical
Ireland
troops
the
the
government’. In
John
Sir
the
the
of
14
following
people
commissions,
‘‘Threshers’’
Ireland,!9? lays the an Irish exciseman:
Act,
Union,
23)
tranquillity,
England’s
annexed,
Register,
1801
OF
universal
the
the
UNION
made
some
with to
ruin
Political
Cobbett.
has
extraordinary
mocked
a
TO
the
of
advocating
laws,
1800
of
‘Union
Ireland
of Instead
severe
and
agitation.
REVOLUTION
almost
the
circulation action
from
the
of
without”.
simplified
into
of
heart “The
the
the
political within
the
instruments
tax
gatherer
232
KARL
and
the
hangman.”
independence
our as
.
property,
clime,
and
and
ance, you
taxation,
and
which,
all
of
bring
all
acquired of
ruinous Ensor:
no
Union,
at
minister
by
ignorant
home
the
impatience
a
and
arbitrary,
power,
all
as to importto rob and to
inferior taxation,
war; very power,
and This
millstone been
and
about
the
away
flaring
abroad.”
war.
Irish
He
taxation’’.
of
consequences,
for
wearers
of
has
is a labyrinth of pretension, gloating corruption.... There is
respect
another
with
been she
in the
very
minister.
this
made
peace
of
has
to
hour
paralysed
English
“an
you
connected English
interred,
to fit
arash,
not
of
national
is
in
war.’’198
wasteful
be
with
that
laws
of
deprive
question
an
detested
“England
to
of Commons injustice, and facts,
that
to
vital of
design
power
invariably the
control
From
and
advanced nation
by
England.
is
upon
the
once
at
by
of
of
legislation
exportation
for
real
another
of
our
disposed
the
semblance
“all
which
shoes
fact,
indeed,
within
thus
her
and
influence
neck
in
in
are
and
projector
own
Union:
grave
boots
was,
It
the
that
persons
like
short-sighted
your
in
our
and
made
may.
they
With
buried
MARX
since
Castlereagh,
taxed “The
imposture, no shame,
the
Union,
the
English
whole
House
falsehood, regard to
no
in
the
English
Parliament.”’
Morning
we
point,
as
to
measure
unfortunate
Petty
said:
meddling
1828:
Chronicle, believe,
both
all
Irish
has
Members
to
corruption
the
agreed.
and
lost,
is
It
the
only
has
been
500
years,
by
of
venality
an
”
Ireland!
constantly
Union
these
the
Ireland.”
to
Loss
The
of
are
England
for
“England
with
hatred Irishmen
“The
which
the
England
[brought
House
of
access
an]
Increase
Commons.
and
ministerial
of
usurpation. the
“How
Manchester the Union! ‘The it
Irish
Members
was
Massacre How they
increased effected
rapine
and
the
of
Union,
prodigality.”’
Ireland—one
precipitated
pass
to
the
themselves,
royal
expenditure,
and
and
the
Union
prerogative the
in
fonds
multiplied
when
the
the manager (Ensor)
Castlereagh, 6 Acts! "199
the
(Ensor.
of
by the
justified
strengthened
means
the
These
be thronged
war
French
to
of
as
England, corruption.
of
every
scheme
large
standing
of
)
pretexts
for
keepimg
a
army. By
effect
the
English and
Union,
the
military
mercenaries.
foreign
House
multiform
of
War
Commons.
business
in
the
of
one
service
country,
in
time
“‘Increased
House
of
when
of
transferred,
are
in
peace.
members, Commons,
and have
the
increased
lessened
the
IRELAND
FROM
attention
the
At
period
Union the
The
affairs.
the
House
the
Speaker
when
business
legislature
fined if they absence for
a
nation
in
is,
658
the
on
no
technically, of a
acquisition
The
House
House.”
a
not
day.
233
of
Commons,
513
of
members. to private
application
morning.
yet
any
nation
consisted The
the Chair, and penalty. Now
are
10th
Business
were
members
the Speaker took with an enhanced
members,
Chair
OF
preceded
the
1801
UNION
members.
England,
met
then
of
takes
there
the
of
TO
absented themselves when whole day was punished
consists
“Every
REVOLUTION
great body of the of Scotland and
the
of
before this
AMERICAN
is
present
when
transacted
often
(Ensor. )
a
by
nation
is
to
injurious
the
liberty
country is a lapsed inheritance, while the people who make the acquisition are submissive to their own rulers, lest they might countenance any disturbance in the superadded nation; they of
both.
at
submit
the
accessory
The
home
story
whole
a
for
barren,
the
Roman
history
aristocracy,
the
Roman
citizens
Every
impeachment
of
liberty
ther.”
(Ensor.)
Roman
about
“Talk
afterwards
part