441 68 17MB
English Pages [266]
I1ARIN
COUNTY FREE LIBRARY
.ASSI
31111010058400 £R
•
M
•
HOWAR
WILL BIDA
McCU
HAM WAL MOL
LEADING CONTEMPORARY POETS SELECT AND COMMENT ON THEIR POEMS 65
__
^
•MOJ
RICH
ROB LO
•
Expedient formS
WILB
HARR ANN LAUTERBACH CLAMPITT LEWIS TURCO BERNARD DEBORA CRECER LLOYD SCHWARTZ ALFRED CORN BRAD LEITHAUSER JO LEHMAN JONATHAN GALASSI MAX1NF COHEN PAUL HOOVER HOWARD MOS WILLIAM HATHAWAY A. R. AMNIONS GFRRIT H STALLWORTHY- DONALD BR1TTON RAC WILLIAM MATTH CHARLES WRIGHT BIDART RICHARD HECHT McCLATCHY ANTHONY HAMMOND MARY JO SALTER JOHN KO; R K) WALDROP DAVE MORICE JOHN HOLL
FULTON
•
•
>>
•
•
•
•
•
-
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
-
•
\
•
•
•
-
•
RICHARD STULL MARJORIE WELISH PAUl HIRSCH WILLIAM LOGAN JOH LETT! LOUIS SIMPSON MARIA FLOOK WILBUR MICHAEL MALINOWITZ DOU HYLL1 FULTON ANN LAUTF CLAMPITT LEWIS TURCO BEK MOLLY PEACOCK JOYCE CAROL MONA VAN DUYN ROBERT PINSKY TOM Dl LO UIS SIMPS* •
.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
.
w.'lS
EDITED
STAL BIDAR
HARLI
McCLA
HAMM( WALDROI
MAR) DAVE
BY
__^
DAVID LEHMAN LI
AN
RIE
U
•
>*M.^S
FPT
ECSTATIC OCCASIONS,
EXPEDIENT FORMS Contemporary American poetry
is
now
experiencing a golden renaissance, with
more extraordinarily
gifted poets here than
ever before, or presently country. David
Lehman,
has created
critic, editor,
casions, Expedient
dazzling banquet of the growing
in
poet, essayist,
Forms a unique and American poems for
number
how
content.
lively, instruc-
form in poetry.
of
Sixty-five notable poets
ing
His
of poetry lovers.
forum on the question
contribute a
Oc-
in Ecstatic
anthology also serves as a tive
any other
were invited
to
poem and a statement explain-
the poem's form relates to
The forms vary from modern
its
free
verse to such traditional formal structures as the sonnet, the sestina, and the villanelle.
The
poets'
comments range from
offhand remarks on the gist of a illuminating,
pithy,
poem
exegeses.
line-by-line
to
A
number of the poems in this collection have never been published before, and many of the poets
— including
Ammons, Ashbery,
Hacker, Hecht, Hollander, Howard, Merrill, Simpson, Updike, Van Duyn, and Wilbur have rarely, if ever,
Clampitt,
—
discussed their
The
result
own work.
is
a book that enriches our
appreciation of poetry by allowing us to
eavesdrop on our greatest contemporary poets "talking shop."
Many
of the contrib-
utors include winners of the Pulitzer prize, the Bollingen prize,
the National
Book
'Continued on back flap)
Copyright
1987 Macmillan Publishing Com>
I
Macmillan,
Inc.
ECSTATIC OCCASIONS, EXPEDIENT
FORMS 65 Leading Contemporary Poets Select and
Comment
on Their Poems
EDITED BY
David Lehman
MACMILLAN PUBLISHING COMPANY NEW YORK COLLIER MACMILLAN PUBLISH!
LONDON
Rs
Copyright
No
All rights reserved
mitted
in
©
1987 by David Lehman
book may be reproduced or
part of this
trans-
any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, includ-
ing photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system,
without permission
in
writing from the Publisher
Company
Macmillan Publishing 866 Third Avenue,
New
York,
NY.
10022
Collier Macmillan Canada, Inc
Permissions and acknowledgments appear on pages
251-256
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Ecstatic occasions, expedient forms 1.
American poetry
— 20th century
Lehman, David,
I
1948-
PS615E37
1987
86-33313
81l'.54'08
ISBN 0-02-570241-6
Macmillan books are available for sales promotions,
at special
discounts for bulk purchases
premiums, fund-raising, or educational use For
details,
contact
Special Sales Director
Macmillan Publishing
Company
866 Third Avenue
New 10
York,
NY
10022
987654321
Book design by Sarabande
Press
Printed in the United States of America
CONTENTS
Preface
xi
Ammons
A. R.
i
John Asbbery
3
Frank Bidart
Donald
6
i9
Britton
Lucie Broch-Broido
Jobn Cage
22 25
Maxine Cbernofj
Amy
28
30
Clampitt
Marc Coben
32
Alfred Corn
34
37
Douglas Crase Robert Creeley
Tom Discb
1
1
1
1
Maria Flook
46
Alice Fulton
49
Jonathan Galassi
Dana
Gioia
Dehora Greger
t
>
58 62
Marilyn Hachtl Rachel Hadas
7()
Miu Hammond
7
\
CONTENTS William
Hathaway
Anthony Hecht Gerrit
Daryl
Henry
Him
14
77 84
87
Edward Hirsch
89
John Hollander
93
Paul Hoover Richard Howard Colette Inez
98
100 104
Phyllis Janowitz
107
Lawrence Joseph
110
Richard Kenney
113
John Koethe
Ann
Lauterhach
117 119
David Lehman
ill
Brad Leithauser
125
William Logan
127
J.
D. McClatchy
130
Michael Malinowitz
Harry Mathews William Matthews
James Merrill Robert
Morgan
Dave Morice
Howard Moss Joyce Carol Oates
133
i36 138 i43
145 148 151 154
Molly Peacock
156
Robert Pinsky
i59
Mary
Jo Salter
161
Lloyd Schwartz
164
4
CONTENTS Louis Simpson
Jon Stallworthy
Richard
172
175
Stull
Lewis Turco
78
1
John Updike
1
82
Mona Van Duyn
f
Paul Violi
86
1
i
Rosm^n> Waldrop
196
Marjone Welish
198
Bernard Welt
200
Richard Wilbur
203
Gw/es Wright
206
John Yau
209
Stephen Yenser
Afterword
A
212 2
1
Bnej Glossary
Further Reading
225 24
Notes on Contributors
Acknowledgments
i
243 25
i
—
PREFACE
to come up with working definition Tryingtrying to measure the circumference of
of form
a
like
ter,
a deity
Pascal
tells us,
everywhere
is
to look for safety in tautologies
way, what
is
form,
what
is
that at
it
Howard Nemerov
answers,"
"For
In
both
all
one
cases,
when we
ask,
is
a little
whose centempted
is
our hopeless
in
holds poems together, echo
has written
appears that poems are
"It
held together by people's opinions of what holds poems together
Nemerov would counsel
us to "talk,
if
we
talk at
not about sonnets
all,
or villanelles and so forth, but about the working-out of whatever
hand
to be
or because
At
a
worked
—
time
it
out." This
makes eminent good where we
leaves us right back
when
"
is
in
sense, although
started
traditional poetic structures propose themselves as
options rather than exigencies,
when
the author of a sonnet sequence
may cavalierly break the rules or invent new ones as he goes along, when it is a commonplace argument that poems fashion their own requirements for the poet to apprehend only after the an
for
geance
enlightened practical criticism establishes
Wisdom
itself
with
a
ven-
dictates that the question of form be addressed with
reference to specific texts
who
then the need
fact,
And,
the absence of
in
all
other authority
better to talk about the formal dimensions of a
poem
than
its
author?
Out
of such thoughts
emerged
mentary by the poets themselves:
come by
a
a
a
anthology of poems and com
forum on form that has
form Each contributor was asked to provide
statement on the decisions that went into
in all their variety,
a
this
follow
As the volume's
its
editor,
a
I
wanted merely
I
sought
compelling context rather than lay the framework
debate,
be-
poem accompanied
making I
itself
t«»r
In-
t
results
establish
polemic
>\nd
to create an expedient occasion tor various
poets to ruminate variously about a
M
common
concern
Accordingly
in
— PREFACE
my
communication with the
initial
hand and
composition.
its
limited myself to raising,
I
such questions
as possible points of departure, at
poets,
What
as these
constraints,
if
upon yourself? Which formal choices preceded the which grew out of
you impose and
act of writing,
the case of a traditional or exotic form,
In
it?
poem
about the
any, did
a
given stanzaic pattern or metrical arrangement, what chiefly attracted
you
to
gem, or
tum
To what
it?
inspiration?
broadly
sense."
I
(as
that "the I
them
urged contributors to
license to disregard just
It
realized from the outset that the
work
as easily to
unsolvable quandary:
sum
muddy
"What
is
queries
if
What
pretext or preamble.
seems
they seemed
about themselves,
poets,
of the statements
what any
in
when
is
it
seemed
to me,
that at
pressed, have to say
inevitably
and
their assumptions,
it
their
comments
Given so diverse be
folly to
a
What
on
with customary
tell
us a great deal
their procedures.
How,
What
in
group of poets
From the
more than one contributor her
I
form
tone? Mightn't their statements prove
went beyond the
writers'
as that
spoken intentions?
assembled here,
it
would
practicing poet's point of view, form
insists
—
is
concomitant to composition.
This opinion of the matter was stated definitively by Marianne
&
a sub-
look for anything resembling consensus. Yet some conclu-
sions are inescapable. as
take?
holds
all
rife
wondered, would the poets elect to approach the subject?
revealing in ways that
received
I
our abstract and
case, constitute a useful
once so nebulous and yet so
at
associations would,
would
narrow
in a
about went without saying
as to clarify
form,
poems together?" The questions would, ject that
my
free to construe
poem) or
needn't exemplify a specific verse form."
reply might
finally
"feel
for organizing a
leading questions.
like
poem
I
momen-
of composition generate your
any strategy
also gave
uncomfortably
in
method
a distinctive
—and
'form'
extent did a principle of form, a technical strata-
Moore
poem "The Past Is the Present." "Ecstasy affords the occasion" Moore wrote, "and expediency determines the form." Form,
for poetry, in
other words, proceeds not from theory but from the pressures of
specific occasion.
Talking about their poems, most poets are empiri-
cannot surprise us to find one poet
cists,
and
lofty
pronouncements
it
a
in
after
another eschewing
favor of expedient explanations.
That
is
cer-
tainly the case in this book. In effect,
talking shop,
the reader will have the chance to eavesdrop on poets
working out "whatever
freely or grudgingly giving themselves
XII
is
in
hand
away
It
to
be worked out,"
adds an extra dimen-
PREFACE sion to our understanding of the individual poets to find
ing in a crisp,
way about
matter-of-fact
verse-making technique, while
A and
B lean back and take
risking an occasional aphorism,
view,
or a precedent
It's
significant,
one poet may choose
Holiday Inn dining room) while another
at a
to re
an idle
dwell on the
will
nature of his self-assigned task (to animate a photograph ol an
The outcome could be
bar in Milan).
looking
blackboard on which,
at a
and frequent
erasures,
poem
a
number
after a suitable
tentatively
Precisely because form
a
term,
it
emerges
Nor
that can best
A
of false starts is
it
an acci-
range of dis
a
so elusive a concept, so multilayered
is
seems perfectly emblematic of the poetic process
something that can be
few words are perhaps
No
reflects.
chosen instance
a
in
itsell
never rigidly denned, something
illustrated but
be grasped with
anthology
this
artists
described as sixty-five ways ol
dent that the question of form should trigger off such closures
their
longer
a
construct the actual circumstances of her poem's composition
meal
talk
gingerly invoking an influence
that
too,
X and V
the nuts and bolts of
in
mind
order on the methods of selection that
was made
effort
be comprehensive
to
I
followed no quota system, invoked no specific criterion other than the sense that the poets'
work be
somehow exemplary What it boils down
in this context.
nerve," Frank
with I
a knife
was
is
instinct
you
"If
you
just run,
Clearly, this
—and
maker of anthologies in
perusing the
omission of
a
list
On
everyone
I
I
'
it
up
as apposite
I
necessarily
the college admissions theory that you accept places I
for,
solicited material
I
hoped
to
end with
admired could be reached, and
asked chose to participate
Still,
I
from
Even so
not
course
not
of
can't help expressing
The poems dnd
luminating or usefully dissenting from one another
They
street
poet
as for the
satisfaction with the finished product
instruct
call
go on your
The remark seems
"
it
of contributors to this volume, you spot the
poets than the sixty-five
everyone whose work
judgment
don't turn around and shout, 'Give
more applicants than you have
many more
a
just
name, please don't assume that
favorite
snubbed him or her
nerve
was
"You
someone's chasing you down the
track star for Mineola Prep
a
for the If,
to
O'Hara wrote
would make
of a quality and kind that
statements
delight
as
my il
they
argue well for the healthy state of contemporary poetry Diivnl LchmMi
XII!
ECSTATIC OCCASIONS, EXPEDIENT
FORMS
AMMONS
A. R.
Out
Inside Among
/\
the
many
kinds of poetic form are those that realize chem
by motion) and those
selves in stasis (achieved
A m
their intelligibility through motion,
their shape,
Sonnets, villanelles are inventions like triangles (these eries)
and
do so
their use
in arbitrary
internal,
is
to cause "nature" to find
human
There
terms.
organic form and imposed,
occasions complement each other as
forms please us even cause they reassure us
when they that we can
is
nature (or energy)
danger
is
is
for a lack of native force,
tive
may be
prosody can
There
in a single
show how
it
can
beings,
splendid
But arbitrary
and impositional be
repress nature, our
may be
own
and
natures
a trifling threat
we
or
have devised systems I
he
boringly clever compensations
boxes to be
filled
with crushed material
taken to exhaust the unlimited existences inven-
and
figural forms,
are narratives shaping transactions to
may on
necessity
find to station the arbitrary in the
are gestural
di^ if
clearly, truly, abundantly released through
that arbitrary forms
boxes which
may be
the famous possibility that
are interposed
human
motion
as
form only
external form
achieve sufficient expression with no more than
can take delight that we, mere
its
that identity
I've
work
of art
too, internal assimilations that
chosen
the figure of winding can suggest
a
short
tin-
poem
of
mine
manifold accuraC)
brook or stream summarizes the meteorological action ol whole terrains, so that wherever there are hills aul\ valleys one \" by which
a
confidently look to find the winding ol this dragon ol assimilation
ECSTATIC OCCASIONS, EXPEDIENT FORMS
Serpent Country Rolled off
out
a side of
mountains or
bottomed
hills,
in flatland
but getting
away, winding,
be found a
will
bright snake
—brook,
stream, or river, or,
in sparest gatherings,
a
wash of stones or
a
green
streak of chaparral across sand.
The sions,
figures,
though,
in this
poem
and these progressions are the
real
form of the poem.
motion, the figure enlarges from brook to stream to figure disappears
green
in the
The form
till
of the
the only "stream" in the landscape
poem
of internal form.
It
is It
In
one
but then the is
a trace of
the motion from the indelible river to the is
a figure of disappearing.
allows to nature
full
faculties to
material, to derive
That
is
one kind
presence and action,
cludes nothing a priori and imposes nothing.
human
river,
brush where an underground stream once briefly moved.
nearly vanished green.
uses
by other progres-
are controlled
It
it
discovers within.
exIt
imagine means, analogies to simplify so much
from the broad sweep of action the accurate
and the ineluctable, suitable form of motion.
figure
—
JOHN ASHBERY
Variation on a Noel "when deep
the
and
snow lay round crisp
about,
and even ..."
A year away from the pigpen, and look at him A thirsty unit by an upending stream, Man doctors, God supplies the necessary medication were
If
elixir
A
thirsty unit
Ashamed
to
be found
the world's dolor, where
in
none
is
by an upending stream,
of the
moon,
of everything that hides too
little
of her
nakedness If
elixir
were to be found
the world's dolor, where
in
Our emancipation should be Ashamed
of the
moon,
is
none,
great and steady
of everything that hides too
little
ot her
nakedness,
The twilight prayers begin to emerge on a country Our emancipation should be great and steady As crossword puzzles done
in this
room,
The twilight prayers begin to emerge on Where no sea contends with the interest As crossword puzzles done I
see the
in this
room,
crossroads
this after-effect
a
countrv crossroads
of the cherry trees this after effect
whole thing written down
Where no
sea contends with the interest ol the cherry trees
Everything but love was abolished
It
staved
oil
I
stepchild
— ECSTATIC OCCASIONS, EXPEDIENT FORMS I
whole thing written down
see the
Whatever the partygoing public needs
Business, a lack of drama.
Everything but love was abolished.
The bent towers
of the
It
stayed on, a stepchild.
playroom advanced
to
something
like
openness,
Whatever the partygoing public needs
Business, a lack of drama.
To be
kind,
and
The bent towers
to forget, passing
of the
through the next doors.
playroom advanced
to
something
like
openness. But
you heard
if
and
it,
if
you
didn't
want
it
To be kind, and to forget, passing through the (For we believe him not exiled from the skies) But
you heard
if
Why For
do
we
I
Your own Because
you
call to
I
Agree
A
exiled from the skies.
after
all
this time?
to.
running for mayor, behaving outlandishly,
friends,
have known him cheaply) to,
say.
Let's leave that
to
remove
all
that concern, another exodus
form of ignorance, you might
Agree to remove
all
say.
Let's leave that
a blessing, taking us far.
that concern, another exodus.
year away from the pigpen, and look at him.
The mere whiteness was
Man
though.
have known him cheaply
The mere whiteness was
A
it,
this time?
form of ignorance, you might
And
want
?
running for mayor, behaving outlandishly
friends,
Spend what they care
A
all
didn't
.
wish to give only what the specialist can give,
I
Your own I
you
after
him not
Spend what they care
(And
if
.
wish to give only what the specialist can give,
I
do
you
call to
believe
Because
Why
I
and
it,
next doors .
doctors,
God
a blessing, taking us far.
supplies the necessary medication
though.
JOHN ASHBERY
first
came
across the
word pantoum
as the title of
one
ments of Ravel's "Trio," and then found the term
I
prosody
my book
I
Some
wrote Trees.
ever used the form
a
poem
in
a
The poem was
is
December its
ol
stricture,
1979
restraints
seem
to
have
a
paradoxically liberating effect
t
in
I
I
I
even greater
other hobbling forms such as the sestina or canzone tor
is
it
the only other time
written in
move
manual
called "Pantoum" in the early '50Sj
"Variation on a Noel"
attracted to the form in both cases because of
than
ol tin-
in
me
These at least
The form has the additional advantage of providing you with twit much poem for your effort, since every line has to be repeated twice
FRANK BIDART
Thinking Through Form am
boy
a
still
bed
lying on his
in
a
dark room every afternoon
after school.
I
am
I
listening to radio-dramas
Then
before dinner. try to force I
insist
on
me
to
go to
listening to
sleep.
"my
ironic,
—
Olivier's
one
until
They
after the other,
my
why
don't understand
friends.
"To be or not
men" on the soundtrack of
A
to be." Garland's
Star
MGM's
Much
I
months, and
later
Born.
The
poems
the works of art that as a Soliloquies.
we
Arias.
I've
feel
my
boy
I
imagined someday
its
us.
Forms
—read about
trails
for
I
denouement
we
in
would make!
—what-
discover what art can
are the language of desire
object.
brain always slightly short-circuits in front of this
word Like "freedom" or "Romanticism," and
sung
heard
written are next to the intensities,
crave to experience over and over as
I
arias
arias
Father-son dramatic agon. Symphonies
be. Love buries these ghost-forms within
before desire has found
—
again and again.
at last seen,
thin the actual
Kazan's East of Eden
the symphonic panoramas of ecstasy and conflict and
essary,
Is
I
Toscanini's Beethoven Ninth.
How
Julius Caesar.
The shape of these songs, soliloquies, times when was discovering what loved.
Callas.
thousands of
"Form"-.
after school
massive outraged fury of Brando's "Friends, Romans, country-
by Maria
ever
for hours,
mother and grandmother
programs'' on the radio instead of staying
my
outside and playing with Later
—
dinner
after
behind
it
a long,
it is full
of contradictions, nec-
bloody history of passionately held
FRANK BIDAR1 opportunities for mutual contempt and condescension
way
Is thru- some which we can escape habitual aSStimp
to think about "form" in
predilections, the hell of "opinions
tions,
Perhaps
the use or practice our ideas are meant to serve
What
they contradict, or try to enlarge
Most present-day theory seems
orists.
we can do
all
— and
the conceptions
poets say never
to
ask
is
most poets
satisfies the
remote
a
rival
universe
The
idea about form that has been most compelling and useful to
as a
poet
me
seemed
—
the idea that,
to describe
when
something
what
like
"
Coleridge's notion of "organic form etics of
embodiment The
discovered
I
work
the
is
artist
—
is
po
a
on Shakesp
"
but must not "copy" the subject
must imitate that which
and
active through form
on
think,
I
crucial texts are his lectures
artist "imitates,"
"The
of art
which
that
already had experienced
finally rests,
It
and wonderful essay "On Poesy or Art
For Coleridge, the
I
graduate school
in
it
within the thing
is
"
figure
ol
If
Shakespeare had
imitated merely the external "form or figure" of his characters, he would
have produced dead copies, figures Romeo and
human
for example,
Juliet,
doesn't talk the
"We know
being) talked:
that
way
real nurses
the true
(just as "that
"nature")
work
which
—and by
a
of is
its
period of each thing, this
is
active" in
it
its
is
if
"
in
the living world itself to us
\
in a
—
work
the
of art
to "mechanical regularity,"
ach
and so has each
self-exposition,
the disturbing forces of accident
thing
—
is
that
lives
embodying
"organic form
form that
is
its
being by
Coleridge
opp
imposed from without
determined:
a
in
the business of ideal art
shape
The form
that
in
within the thing" takes on form
took on form
it
moment of we remove
Such "self-exposition" finding
which
kind of self-manifesting, shows
thing that lives has
To do
"that
art,
in
or any
no Nurse talked exactly
way, tho' particular sentences might be to that purpose In
The Nurse
wax museum
a
in
is
mechanic when on any given material we
pre-determined form, not necessarily arising out
erties of the material,
as
whatever shape we wish
when it
to a
to retain
ganic form, on the other hand,
is
mass
of
of the-
it
prop
wet clay W
when hardened
innate
im;
shapes
as
I
it
Ik-
01
devel
pre
— ECSTATIC OCCASIONS, EXPEDIENT FORMS ops
from within, and the fullness of
itself
one and the same with the perfection of the
is
ditional forms like
"all
nations have
vention of metre and measured sounds" of poetry") His point
poem
that
is
that only by
is
reveal itself already
not attacking tra-
"the vehicle
is
imagine
can't
felt"
that "the in-
and involucrum
form can the subject
the appropriate
—the poem's formal means must embody the innate structure at least implicit
there,
The
properties of the material."
difference between the
work
the "the
in
and
of art
must never be obscured:
"nature"
there be likeness to nature without any check of difference,
If
the result ture, .
.
is
meter or formal stanzaic patterns. (He
poetry without meter, arguing that
form
is
such the form.
life,
By attacking "pre-determined form" Coleridge
of the
development
its
outward form Such
its
as .
is
disgusting.
waxwork
You
set out
.
.
figures of
.
Why
are such simulations of na-
men and women,
with a supposed reality and are disappointed
and disgusted with the deception, whilst
in respect to a
work
you begin with an acknowledged
total
and then every touch of nature gives you the
plea-
of genuine imitation, difference,
so disagreeable?
sure of an approximation to truth.
But to have "genuine imitation" (the phrase catches that reconciliation of the seemingly irreconcilable Coleridge so often insists
and
form:
is
necessary
the source or ground of form must always be
possible),
"The idea which
puts
form
the
together
cannot
beyond
itself
be
the form."
When
form
proceeds
from subject, "developing
what speaks, what the work "witnesses" that lives itself.
The
tion of the author: as
subject "witnesses
"Remember
that there
or the imprisonment of the thing,
and self-effected sphere of agency
—
the latter
the former
thing
without the interven-
a difference
is
—
from within,"
the at-last-manifested
is
itself," as if
proceeding, and shape as superinduced,
itself
is
is
its
between form
either the death
self-witnessing
"
Coleridge's language often implies that self-witnessing "organic form"
has an inner
shapes as art
has
its
it
life
of
its
develops
own
own, independent of the
itself
from within
" .
.
will of the artist:
Similarly, the
laws, the organic laws of a living body:
work
"it
of
FRANK BIDAR T Imagine not
The
am about
I
spirit of poetry,
cessity circumscribe itself
with beauty is
by
were
rules
order to reveal
in
"It
at
is
of necessity an organized one,
once end and means
must embody
order
in
a
itself
— and
but
what
whole so
art
all
a
It is
—
for Coleridge,
generous and enabling principle,
world," reality, what
is
—can
real
beyond words or
take on
this
the funda-
is
semi-opaque,
me
for
how
tor
In a typically
it
this
pregnant
he meditates the
and the power
of law
ol
original, of creation:
indeed
is
there any danger of this
can
be lawless
—
Coleridge
in
power
of true genius dare
nius
the
extremely eloquent passage,
No work it,
medium
the art
mystery of the relations between the
something
poem
lite
role in or control over
artist's
ol a
says that
it
an
single formula or paradigm,
its
tor
its
There
no
each
ol
art
is
01
appropriate form and reveal
can get into
happens, the
is
thai
mental process, the great principle lying beneath the making
and
nc
ol
1
reveal itself"
to
I
must
only to unite poM
it
ganization, but the connection of parts to part
to rules
other living powers
must embody
It
body
living
oppose genius
to
like all
the
power
For
1
is
it
want
even
its
appropriate form, neither
As
it
must
so neither
not,
this that constitutes it[s] ge-
of acting creatively under laws of
own
its
ori^
ination
How a
does
"organic form"
poem? The
organic form
is
in a
I
most poems
"subject" of
character
as the
bear on what
drama
embedded
—
experience is
when
in his lectures
or nameahle
not as defined
so the fact that Coleridge
trv to write
I
discussion of
s
on Shakespeare
plays leaves
s
a great deal unexplored, unsaid In /
what sense
know
to write a it
is
I'll
when
that
The form first
read a poem in
end of
I
of the
of an
want
the sensation that
write,
relation
I
have to
/(
at least
is
I
its
m
sub
only able
the illusion that
mv poem
to
tin-
\\\\d
this essay)
poem
consciously taken
made up
what
I
to explore this in
(printed at the
at
I
poem when, try
of
the form of a lyric the "self-witnessing
is
opening
— though in
idiosyncratic
^d
undoubted!)
by the reader— is perfectly regular
o( six lines
two middle sections
,.t
It
is
twelve lines
ECSTATIC OCCASIONS, EXPEDIENT FORMS each, and a closing section that
the end
comes
kind of "refrain"
a
—
Aside from these "refrain" is
in
made up
the same length as the opening
is
two middle sections there
of the
it is
the same as the
opening section
"refrain" line
throughout the
(same
of the opening
the
poem
structure,
this.
middle section (about The
first
At
which be-
line,
and one-line stanzas The
(6 lines in 4 stanzas
line stanzas
last line
set off as separate stanzas,
lines,
of alternating two-line
other words, looks like
an extra
is
—
alternating 2-line
as last line of
—
1-
poem)
rest of the
Gorilla
and
12 lines in 8 stanzas)
opening section)
second middle section (about the "y° u " addressed by the poem 12 lines in 8 stanzas) "refrain" line
closing section (6 lines in 4 stanzas)
This I
the stanzaic structure of the poem.
is
didn't,
begin by deciding to
of course,
and seemingly arbitrary I've
a structure.
The
first
unrhymed lines
The
I
couplets.
)
love
I've
known
—
How
wrote were the
out so idiosyncratic
(The other formal stanzaic patterns
used have been either traditional
simple, like
fill
a sonnet,
did
last
it
a villanelle
—or very
happen?
three of the poem:
the love of
is
two people staring
not
At
first
I
not
each other, but
wrote them
didn't look the
The
at
way
love at
I
I've
as
two
in
lines
the same direction
They looked
terrible
lousy.
They
heard them:
known
is
each other, but
the love of two people staring in
the same direction
Nothing of the dynamic within the idea
is
present
in
how
this looks
on the page
So
I
tried setting
it
up
in
three lines, with a stanza break after the
10
FRANK BIDART
I've
—
as
it
now
known
is
the
second
cause
—which
stanza ("two people staring")
stanza break, the sentence
an expectation
same
—
had something balanced
I
is
not "balanced" but points
is
After the gap,
completed by
The
the
outsidt
the slight pause ol the
which
a line
reestablishes "balance" ("not
direction").
["he loot
followed by something linked to it— be
love of"),
the same stanza
in
Now
stands
— by denying
each other, but
at
denial of an expectation
becomes
the
in
means
the
understanding the nature of the thing (love) that caused
ol
the
pectation.
To my This
eyes, set
in three lines this action
didn't, of course,
sense that turns out
was quoting
I
I
quoted
as
Rudy
in
lines
who
wasn't sure
had the
I
— Augustine?
It
Kikel's "Local Vi-
was quoting Saint-Exupery
turns out,
it
present
is
make them good
necessarily
somebody, but
was quoting Auden,
I
Auden,
sions."
up
(Was
quot-
be
ing Augustine?) felt
1
the lines should end the poem, but they looked hardly more
When
than a moralism, or homily.
were accompanied by
the words
very strong affect
a
—
came
Loss
But
The poem
the
came before them, would have
still-unwritten lines that
head, they
bleakness, misery
themselves, on the page, they were curiously blank
in
my
into
to
them
fill
across
which
(during an extremely long tracking shot) one reads the most
oppositt
a
like
little
Garbo's face
(Her
emotions.
misery, bleakness
seem
irrelevant,
I
I
)
The
wanted the
fact that
wanted them
given of the culture, of our across
and on
the end of Queen
which we read very
I
life
lines to
her to
told
seem
—
just
(in their
lines
"eloquence")
boulder
like a
there,
different emotions
think ol
be denser than simply
was probably quoting the
to
depending on what we
air,
Christina,
Rouben Mamoulian,
director,
or a banana
nothing,
at
a
A
didn
kind
t
ol
boulder
depending on the
light
when we come
are already feeling
it
So the poem had love, It
and
still
at least four
be written The poem
people
I
was close
has seemed again and again
of greatest connection of later connection
had had
if
—
—
in
my
to
experience that the moments
moments of intimacy happened when one ol us are always
only secret from our daylight selves
same
were the ground
that foi
whatevei reason
into the nearly intolerable things that
changed These things
staring at "in the
imagined was about
I
who were dc^l
the
to look straight down,
couldn't be
even
to
direction",
I
this
i
m some
way
SCCTCtS
His was what
was what
I
knew had
we to
-•
b
—
—
—
ECSTATIC OCCASIONS, EXPEDIENT FORMS down on
For a long time
know what
do
to
I
Like the
had had banging around
NIGHT
a
is
lines,
final
was associated
it
ments
still
at least) in fact line,
language
common
I
mysticism
in
the
this night:
want
didn't
—
my mind
in
I
.
.
.
of this line
movement
this
(for
mo-
the night, like
inside
seemed
inside
to "rationalize" the line in the
associated with
alone,
with a great deal
have been describing, the
I
the night
is
it
repetition, in different contexts,
things
didn't
through the kind of violation of
this
The movement
apprehension of
I
alive there
embodies
for me,
but unlike night
a line
and the sense that both of us were
yearning to return to
The
head
NIGHT
within the
with that intimacy, that "staring"
in part,
my
in
which looked so emotionally "blank"
entirely "unexplicit" line
by
as the reader read the final lines.
with:
There
out.
poem
the reader of the
a
kind of ecstatic
which
poem
is
—
I
an opening
hoped
would accrue the density
it
that
of the
it.
the movement have described couldn't be The whole texture of the poem the movement of the poem throughout had to embody at least variations on this movement inside that is an opening out Or, conversely, a breaking out that is also somehow a completion.
For this to happen,
isolated in
one
I
—
line.
—
After
wrote a version of the three
I
final three,
I
saw that
a pattern
seemed
one-line stanzas. This
immediately preceding the
lines
was possible
to catch the
—
alternating two-line
motion of something partly
"balanced," enclosed yet also partly "unstable"
thing breaks that, in freeing pletes"
what came
before.
followed by one-line as
Then
I
I
motion
wrote the opening of the poem, which has
repetition
existed.
out of which some-
some degree balances and "com-
a "unit" of this
I
across lines ("see each other again,
"It
—
began to think of each group of two-lines
"balancing" in the lines ("What
The
to
itself,
It
and
(when
hope
—
/
and
.
I
hope)"),
a great deal of
and repetition
again reach the VEIN").
and balancing partly betray uncertainty, over-assertion: existed."
The
first
single line of the
"breaks out" of the opening couplet
(".
but the second single line does this
There
is
a
NIGHT
.
.
to a degree,
and again reach the VEIN"),
much more:
within the
12
poem,
NIGHT
FRANK BIDART The
section that follows
is
an elaborated parallel to the experience
with the "you" addressed by the poem, reader should finally see
comic
came out
It
parallel
its
is
of The Gorilla, a
starring the Ritz Brothers
unmask,
is
The
depends,
where the
"outer" house
because,
house
"inner"
—on which
The
who
mansion
a
The
d
Both
Mid-
NOTES ON CONTRIBUTORS for the National Book Critics Circle Award. She has held a Guggenheim Fellowship and in 1984 was named the forty-eighth Fellow of the Academy of American Poets.
nominated
MARC Cohen's and in
a four-part
New
York
poems have appeared
anthology
and
Crowd, The Various Light,
DOUGLAS CRASE ROBERT CREELEY
He
Gardens (1986).
where he
(stories),
and The
of verse include
lives
Award
year
latest
book
of verse
Gray Professor
of Poetry
This (poems),
Toaster (a children's book),
Little
the
He
i945-i975
Collected Poems,
His
later.
the David
A
Midst oj
the
re-
for poetry in 1985.
DlSCH's books include Burn The Brave
Call in
teaches at the State University of
is
Businessman-.
A
Notes Jrom a Child of Paradise.
published his
his Collected Prose a
TOM
He
Black and White.
the author of The Revisionist (1981).
is
ceived a Whiting Writer's
Buffalo,
to
City.
ALFRED Corn's books
and
jn Partisan Review, Shenandoah,
titled The Return
New and
Memory
York
at
Letters.
Getting into
Camp
1983
in
is
Death
Concentration
Tale of Terror (novels). Electronic Arts
is
bringing
out his computer-interactive novel Amnesia.
MARIA FLOOK been
a
Fellow of the Fine Arts
and now teaches
rina,
won
Work
Center
in
Provincetown, Mass.,
University of North Carolina, Asheville.
at the
ALICE FULTON's
She has
the author of Reckless Wedding (1982).
is
book
first
of poems, Dance Script with
the 1982 Associated Writing Programs Award.
Electric Balle-
Her second
book, Palladium, was a selection of the 1985 National Poetry Series.
She recently completed Society of Fellows
a three-year stint as a Fellow of the
Ann
in
JONATHAN GALASSI
Michigan
Arbor. the poetry editor of The Paris Review.
He
has published two volumes of translations of Eugenio Montale:
The
Second
Life of Art-. Selected
Dana GlOIA
is
is
Essays
and
businessman
a
Otherwise: Last and First Poems. in
New
poems, Daily Horoscope, was published
Weldon Kees. DEBORA GREGER is the author
in
York. His
first
collection of
1986. Gioia has also edited
the short stories of
able Islands
of
two collections of poetry, Mov-
(1980) and And (1985). She has lived
in
England
as
an
Amy
Lowell Poetry Traveling Scholar.
MARILYN Hacker i3th
Moon. Her
book
latest
narrative in sonnets.
National Book
Award
RACHEL HADAS
the editor of the feminist literary magazine
is
is
Love,
An
earlier
in
poetry
Death and
volume, in
the
Changing of
Presentation Piece,
the Seasons, a
received the
1975
teaches English at the
244
Newark campus
of Rutgers
NOTES ON CONTRIBUTORS University.
and
She
Seferis.
A new
the author of Slow Transparency,
is
Form, Cycle,
Landscape
Infinity:
Mac Hammond
(1982) and
Sleep
forthcoming
is
member
a
is
& Fowl
Fish, Flesh
of the faculty of
and recently held the post of Consultant
brary of Congress. The Hard Hours
SUNY
at
won
Obblicjati:
Essays
in
in
I
Poetry to the
Li
the Pulitzer Prize for poetry
in
(poems) and
Vespers
Criticism.
GERRIT HENRY News and
198
Georgetown Uni-
in
Hecht's most recent books are The Venetian
Art
Q
Robert host and
oj
Son from
the author of four hooks ol poetry,
is
Inertia
Anthony Hecht
1968
poems
l
heads the creative writing program
William Hathaway eluding The Gymnast of
ica,
Poetry
A
titled
hook
a
His books include The Horse Opera and Cold Turkey
Buffalo.
versity,
in
poems
collection of
the
is
Arts.
an art
critic
who
writes regularly for Art
His poems have appeared
Amer-
in
and American
in Poetry
Poetry Review.
DARYL HlNE was riod ending in 1978.
lowed,
a
year
Theocritus
later,
the editor of Poetry magazine for a ten-year pe-
His
by
Selected
At present he
is
Poems appeared
1981 and was
in
translation of the Idylls and Epigrams
his
teaching
fol-
of
Northwestern University and
at
translating Ovid's Heroides into English.
EDWARD HlRSCH walkers
has published two books of poems, For
(1981) and Wild Gratitude
including a
the Sleep-
(1986), and received numerous awards
Guggenheim Fellowship He
teaches at the University of
Houston.
John Hollander's
latest
book
of poetry
1982
jointly
Time and Pine
i
Guide
English Verse
to
awarded the Bollingen
Powers
He and
Prize in poetry in
Hollander teaches at Yale
Paul Hoover Somebody Talks a in
A
(poems), and Rhyme's Reason:
Anthony Hecht were
In
Figure of Echo (criticism),
Other recent publications include The of Thirteen
is
Lot,
is
the author of
and
Letter to Einstein
Nervous Songs.
He
teaches
Beginning Deal Albert. at
C
olumbia
C
ollegc
Chicago
Richard Untitled Subjects
Howard
was awarded the Pulitzer Prize
(1969) and the American Book Award tor
of Baudelaire's Les Fleurs du mal (1982)
poetry
in
his translation
Alone With America, his landmark
book on contemporary American poetry, was reissued in an edition in 1980 Howard's ninth book ol poems is No Travtia
COLETII INEZ She
is
teaches poetry workshops
the author of Eight Minutes from
Names (1977)
She received
a
tot
the
Sun
.it
C
1983
r
The
New
Rcpuhlu
New RepMi And
in the- Fall
Wmte-i 1983
Novcm
1 I
)
the-
issue
authoi oi Epo.h
Reprinted by permission of the poet Alfred
Corn
by Alfred Corn
"Infinity Effect at the