355 41 6MB
English Pages 145
ECONOMIC FACTORS INVOLVED IN BRITAIN’S PARTICIPATION IN A WESTERN EUROPEAN UNION
A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Department of International Relations University of Southern California
In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts
by Theodore A. Tremblay September 1950
UMI Number: EP59903
All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
Dissertation P~bl,shjng
UMI EP59903 Published by ProQuest LLC (2014). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code
ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346
I
Si
7 -7 % $
T h is thesis, w r it t e n by
...... The o dor©.. A ♦.__Tr©mb 1 ay u n d e r the g u id a n c e o f and a p p ro ve d
by a l l
F a c u l t y C o m m itte e , its
m em b ers, has been
p resen ted to a n d accepted by the C o u n c i l on G ra d u a te S t u d y a n d R e search in p a r t i a l f u l f i l l m e n t o f the re q u ire m e n ts f o r the degree o f ..............
H.
J. DEUEL, JR. DEAR'........ ....
F a c u lty C om m ittee
...... Chairman
TABLE OP CONTENTS CHAPTER I.
PAGE
INTRODUCTION ................................. The problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Statement of the problem
..............
Importance of Britain*s position
• . •
Definitions of terms used • • • • • • • • Union and Federation
. . . . . . . . .
1 2 2 2, 4; i 4'
Western U n i o n ............
5
Commonwealth and Empire * • ...........
5
Sterling Area ...........
8
. . . . . . .
Organization of remainder of the thesis *
11 (
II.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS LEADING TO CLOSER WESTERN EUROPEAN COOPERATION
...........
13
Relationship of Western Union to the League of Nations and the United N a t i o n s .........................
. . .
Post-World War II cooperation • • • • • • Benelux
............... ..
European Coal Organization
• • • • • •
13 15 15 16'
European Central Inland Transportation Organization
• • • • * • •
........
16
Emergency Economic Committee for Europe
• ♦ .........
. . . . . . . .
17
ii PAGE
CHAPTER Economic Commission for Europe • • •
17
Economic and Social Council of the United Nations • • • •
...........
i
17
Committee of European Economic Cooperation
.....................
Treaty of Dunkirk Brussels Pact
.................
.....................
20
22
.................
24
British financial agreements • • . .
26
Intra-European Payments Scheme
• ••
27
Intra-European Payments Union
♦ ••
28.
Private organizations encouraging union III.
19! i
• • • • • • • •
North Atlantic Pact Council of Europe
18
CONDITIONS AND ATTITUDES IN GREAT BRITAIN
30
33
l
Conditions prior to World War II
. .•
33
Problems created by World War II
• .•
34:
British attitude towards a customs union
# . ♦ ♦ .....................
Dollar shortage
.............
• . . •
37| 38t !
• •
42|
• • . • •
46^
Devaluation of the pound sterling Choice of approach to union Attitude of Labor Party
49
Attitude of Conservative Party • • • ♦
51
iii CHAPTER
IV.
PAGE Commonwealth considerations ...........
52
Progress towards economic recovery
54
. *
PRESSURE PROM THE UNITED S T A T E S .........
56
Bretton Woods Agreement ...............
56
Financial and Trade Agreement ........
58
Marshall Plan . .......................
60
American motives
63
Creation of new economic problems • •
64
,
Economic cooperation within the North Atlantic Pact .......................
67
United States attitude towards proposals for European union
. . . .
Council of Europe .....................
68 69
Possible ramifications of American pressure
............................
69 i
Influence of threat of Russian a g g r e s s i o n ............. ............ V.
PRESSURE PROM STATES OF WESTERN EUROPE . .
i 70
i 71 I
France
................................
711
Belgium ................................
73
Netherlands • *
.......................
74
;
Italy ..................................
74
;
Denmark ................................
74i
iv ■CHAPTER
VI.
PAGE O t h e r s ....................................
75
Attitude of the Soviet U n i o n .............
75
PRESSURE PROM MEMBERS OP THE COMMONWEALTH. Ottawa A g r e e m e n t s ................. ..
.
77
. •
77
First British Commonwealth Relations Conference, Toronto, 1933
81;
Imperial Preferential System after World War I I ............................ Commonwealth and European union
........
83
Attitudes of various Commonwealth members Eire
•
84:
..................................
Union of South Africa
82
84
• * .............
85
A u s t r a l i a ..............
86'
New Z e a l a n d ............................
89'
Canada • • • • • •
91,
s
.....................
!
! ! VII.
India and P a k i s t a n .............. THE SCHUMAN PLAN .
. . .
.....................
.
94 96i I
Statement by Robert Schuman .
...........
Essentials of the p l a n ...................
96 97 i
I
Advantages for P r a n c e ...................
98'
Advantages for G e r m a n y ..........
99j
I
j
i
i
i
Obstacles to Implementation of plan
• • •
i
?
|
99;
Western European a t t i t u d e s ...............
102|
V
CHAPTER
PAGE British reaction . ............ ..........
103
Ramifications for B r i t a i n ....
103
Labor Party a t t i t u d e ..........
105
Conservative Party attitude. . . . . .
105
Liberal Party attitude .................... Attitude of Continental Socialists . • •
•
Attitude of the United States• • • • • • Political implications of the
Economic implications of the plan
!
Changed British attitude since 1945
VIII.
107. 107
plan • . .
;
105;
.
108
• . . •
108
...
109.
C O N C L U S I O N .........................
112
B I B L I O G R A P H Y .............................
119
A P P E N D I X ..................................
127
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION From time to time Europe has had its good dreams of getting together and forming a cohesive community.
There
was the ”Grand Design” of Henry IV of France, while through out the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries the vision of a i united Europe occurs in the writings of Montesquieu, iRousseau, Kant, St. Simon, and others.
Attempted implemen
tation in the form of the ”Holy Alliance” was unsuccessful. Similarly, M. Aristide Briand*s scheme for a European econ omic union died at birth some twenty years ago. While the precursory attempts at union are of historical interest, this paper will deal primarily with the move ment for European integration following World War II.
t t
j
123 B.
BOOKS
Boyd, Andrew, Western Union, Trend Toward European Unity* Washington, D. C .; Public.Affairs Press, 1949, 183 pp. ______ , British Commonwealth Relations Conference * Oxford University fress, 1645. 266 pp. Dietrich, Ethel B., World Trade * Company, 1939. 458 pp.
London:
Hew York: Henry Holt and
Frisoff, V., The Unity of Europe; Realities and Aspirations.; London: L. Drummond, 1647. 305 pp. Frost, Richard, The British Commonwealth and the World. London; Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1945. 74 pp. ( Gross, Feliks, European Ideologies. Hew York: The Philo sophical Library, 1948. 1675 pp. Hawtrey, Ralph George, Western Union, Implications for the United Kingdom. London: Royal Institute of Interna11on al Affairs, 1649. 126 pp. Hylkema, Edgar, Benelux, Le Chemin vers l*Unite Economique. 1 Paris: A. Pedrone, 191F. 206 pp. Mackay, Ronald, You C a n 1t Turn the Clock Back. Chicago: Ziff-Davis PuBTishing Company, 1948. 367 pp. Russell, Frank M., Theories of International Relations. York: D. App1eton-C©ntury Company, 1936. 651 pp.
Hew
Sickesz, W. C., Sovereignty, The Right of the Hations to Commit Suicide Unhindered. Amsterdam: Holdert and Company, 1948. 209 pp. Strausz-Hupe, Robert and Possony, Stefan T., International Relations. Hew York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1950. 647 p p . , The British Empire. Press, 1938. 342 pp.
London: Oxford University:
; j 1
;
Walker, Eric A., The British Empire, Its Structure and | Spirit. London: Oxford University fress, 1943. 250 pp.j
124 Ward, Barbara, The West At Bay. New York; W. W. Norton and Company, Inc., 1948. 288 pp. C.
PERIODICAL ARTICLES
Alexandrowicz, C., TfThe Economic Commission for Europe,” World Affairs, 3:43-54, January, 1949. Anderson, Karl L., "Currency Devaluation and the Pound Sterling,” Foreign Commerce Weekly, 37:3-5, November 28,' 1949. i Bareau, Paul, "Devaluation: A British View,” The Virginia Quarterly Review, 26:20-7, Winter, 1950. Bevin, Ernest, "Organization of the Post-War World,” Vital Speeches, 14:226-34, February 1, 1948. , "British Commonwealth and Western Union,” The Roundtable, Limited, 38:631-42, June, 1948. , "British White Paper,” Political Science Quarterly, 64:161-67, June, 1949. Carey, June Perry Clark, "Western European Union and the Atlantic Community,” Foreign Policy Report, 26:66-80, June 15, 1950. ! Comstock, Alzada, "Commonwealth and Empire,” Current History, 16:162-66, March, 1949.
i
Courtin, Rene, "French Views on European Union," Internation al Affairs, 25:8-22, January, 1949. i _______ , "Does Uniscan Mean Business?," The Economist, 157: [ 1281,.December 10, 1949. ;
, "European Payments Scheme: TCcTay, 5:328-38, August, 1949.
New Version," The World
Fay, Sidney B., "Union for Western Union," Current History, 16:156-61, March, 194 9. ; ,
, "First Fruits of Devaluation,” The Economist, 158:33-34, January 7, 1950.
:
I i
125 Gary, Howard C., "French Steel Plan Opens Debate on Europe's Economy,” Foreign Policy Bulletin, 29:4, May 19, 1950* Kayser, Elmer Louis, f,The Council of Europe,” World Affairs, 112:7-8, Spring, 1949* , Knorr, Klaus, "Problems of a Western European Union,” Review of Politics, 11:131-52, April, 1949. Mansergh, Nicholas, "Britain, the Commonwealth, and Western . Union," International Affairs, 24:491-504, October, 1948* 1 " ■ I McClellan, Grant S*, "British and Western European Union,” j Foreign Policy Report, 24:122-32, October 15, 1948. ' ,
, "M. Schuman Sets the Pace,” The Economist, 158:1206, June 3, 1950.
i
, "Next Steps for 'United Europe'," The Roundtable, Limited, 38:742-48, September, 1948. ________ , "Prices Since Devaluation," The Economist, 158:92-4; January 14, 1950. , "Ripples from the Schuman Pool," The Economist, 15^:1374, June 24, 1950. Salter, Sir Arthur, "After Devaluation: The Common Task," Foreign Affairs, 28:216-230, January, 1950. r"
‘
f-
"
!
"■ -
Schuman, Robert, "Franco-German Coal and Steel Pool,”Vital ■ Speeches, 16:482-83, June 1, 1950. I I
Strange, Susan, f,The Council of Europe," World Affairs, 3:246-58, July, 1949. , "The Onus of the Minus,” The January 1, 1949. ,
onomist, 156:3-4,
j i j
, "The Schuman Scheme," The Economist, 158:1108, May 20, 1950.
i .
, "The United States of Europe," The World Today, 3TT55 t 69, April, 1947. _ *
! ! i i
, "Towards a Parliament of Europe,” The Roundtable, Limited, 39:15-20, December, 1949. .
!
126 ;Ward, Barbara, ”Britain*s Economic Crisis,” The Commercial and Financial Chronicle, 170:8, November 16, 1949. Ward, Barbara, ’’Decide or Drift,” Contemporary International Relations, 1949-50, 1:94-97, _ld'4§« Ward, Barbara, ’’Keystone of a Western Union is Britain,” New York Times Magazine, May 16, 1948* , ’’Western Union,” The World Today, 5:170-83, April, 1949• D.
PAMPHLETS
Healy, Denis, ’’Feet on the Ground,” Labour Party Pamphlet, 1948. ~ ;
E.
NEWSPAPERS
New York Times, September 3, 1948. |New York Times, September 28, 1948. New York Times, February 22, 1950. New York Times, May 14, 1950. New York Times, June 4, 1950.
^— -T
.
■New York Times, June 25, 1950. Stringer, William H., ”The Commonwealth Does It Again,” ! Christian Science Monitor, April 30, 1949.
APPENDIX
APPENDIX A* POPULATION FIGURES EUROPE AND HER DEPENDENCIES !•
Five Nations In the "Brussels" Group: Britain 48.631.000 France 40.600.000 Belgium 8.388.000 Netherlands 9.600.000 Luxembourg 285,000 Total 10*7,504,000
II.
Dependencies »r
183.071.000 Grand Total
290.575.000
Dependencies
10,875,000
Other E. R. P. Nations: 6.908.000 Austria Denmark 4.102.000 Eire 2.950.000 Greece 7.450.000 Iceland 132,000 Italy 50,675,000 Norway 3.105.000 Portugal 8.400.000 Sweden 6.719.000 Switzerland 4,265,000 Turkey 18,632,000 Total 115,338,000
Grand Total III.
124,213,000
Germany: American, British, and French Zones -
; IV. i
66.420.000 67.823.000 13.814.000 35,014,000**
48,000,000
Total Populations for E. R. P. Nations: In Europe: 268,842,000
Dependencies: 213,946,000
• Grand Total: 482,788,000
* Andrew Boyd, Western Union, Trend Toward European Unity (Washington, D. C.: Public Affairs Press, 1949), pp. 165-66. Not including Indonesia.
128
APPENDIX B* COMPONENT PARTS OP THE BRITISH COMMONWEALTH I#
Sovereign States; a. b. c. d. e. f.
II.
United Kingdom of ureaii Great Britain a n t a m ana and Northern Ireland Canada Australia New Zealand South Africa Ceylon
Area
Population.
94,291 3,466,882 2,977,600 103,935 472,550 25,000
50,015,000 12,582,000 7,580,800 1,802,640 11,391,950 6,660,000
26,959 628,808 236,638
2,953,450 231,400,000. 69,000,000:
Special Status; a. b. c.
Eire India Pakistan
# r,The Component Parts of the British Commonwealth and Empire,” British information Services, Reference Division* jjED_704 (Revised), August, 1948, pp.' 1-2.__________ ________
129 APPENDIX C* OPINION IN BELGIUM, NETHERLANDS, AND LUXEMBOURG CONCERNING THE BENELUX UNION. I*
Belgique--Chambre des Representants
93 pour l funion 12 contre 21 abstentions
135 pour 1'union 5 contre 21 abstentions II.
Pays-Bas— Deuxieme Charabre des Stais-Generaux
Senate
Premiere Chambra des Stats-Generaux
Unanimite sans appel nominal III.
Luxembourg--Charabre des Deputes 45 pour 1»union 0 contre 5 abstentions
IV.
In 1947, there were held polls by f,L fInstitut beige d ’Opinion Public11 and the Institut Gallup neerlandais.r? The question asked was nCroyez-vous q u fune collaboration economique etroit entre la Belgique, les Pays-Bas, et le Grand-Duche de Luxembourg soit un bonne chose ou non?ff The results of these polls follow: Belgium:
69$ favored the economic collaboration 7$ opposed
Netherlands: 83$ favored the economic collaboration 5$ opposed
* Edgar Hylkema, Benelux, Le Chgyin vers 1 *Unite Economique (Paris: A. P e dr one, 1948), p p . 115-16.
130 APPENDIX D# PERCENTAGES OP MERCHANDISE TRADE OP THE UNITED KINGDOM WITH OTHER BRITISH COUNTRIES IMPORTS 1930
1931
1932
1933
1934
1935
1936
United Kingdom
29.1
28.7
35.3
37.0
37.1
37.6
39.2
Canada
22.6
25.6
29.6
32.4
30.0
31.6
29.5
Australia
53.3
52.1
54.9
56.9
58.2
57.4
56.2
New Zealand
68.6
70.2
71.8
74.0
73.5
73.2
73.0
South Africa
57.8
56.7
57.4
59.8
58.6
58.7
55.7
British India
46.2
44.8
44.7
50.1
49.4
48.8
49.2
EXPORTS 1930
1931
1932
1933
1934
1935
1936
United Kingdom
43.8
43.7
45.3
44.5
46.8
48.0
49.2
Canada
36.8
38.0
46.9
48.1
51.8
52.5
50.3
Australia
56.4
54.4
58.6
56.5
55.3
62.5
59.2
New Zealand
91.4
93.2
93.9
91.4
87.5
89.5
85.9
South Africa
59.7
62.4
57.7
52.4
55.7
55.4
53.1
British India
39.4
43.7
45.0
46.3
45.4
i —i . to
45.3
* , The British Empire (London; Oxford University Press, 1938), £)• 285.
131 APPENDIX E* THE CHANNELS OP BRITISH TRADE This is an analysis by area, giving monthly averages 'in millions of pounds sterling. IMPORTS INTO BRITAIN (from)
1938 1946 1947 1948 1949 Jan. 1950 Peb • 1950 Mar. 1950 i
Sterling^ Cos. 23.9 35.5 46.5 62.4 72.7 77.4 71.8 88.8
Br. Cos. & Irish Rep. 30.2 52.3 66.2 81.0 90.5 96.3 82.5 102.6
Europe 25.7 19.4 30.8 42.9 53.6 58.9 50.6 63.0
North America 16.6 35.9 44.7 33.9 37.3 37.7 27.5 31.1
EXPORTS PROM BRITAIN (to)
1938 1946 1947 1948 1949 Jan. 1950 Peb. 1950 Mar. 1950
Sterling^ Cos. 17.6 34.4 46.1 65.5 77.2 83.1 78.4 86.5
Br. Cos. & Irish Rep. 19.2 35.4 46.9 69.0 82.4 89.4 85.2 94.1
Europe 14.4 29.1 32.3 43.0 45.6 59.4 51.5 66.0
North America 3.7 5.7 7.7 11.5 11.4 15.2 14.3 16.3
** Monthly Digest of Statistics, Number 55, (London: iHis Maje sty *s Stations r y U f f i c e , 1956), May, 1950, . pp. 90-91.
; I
*Hf i British Countries, except Canada and Anglo!Egyptian Sudan, together with the Irish Republic, Burma, ;Iraq, and Iceland.
[ ! !
132 APPENDIX E (continued) IMPORTS INTO BRITAIN (f^om) Irish India, New So. Rep. Prance Pakis. Aust. Zealand Canada Afr. Swed. Den. 1938
1.9
2.0
4*2
6.0
3.9
6.8
9.8
2.0
3.2 ,
1946
3.1
1.2
5.7
5.6
6.2
16.7
19.1
2.7
1.7
1947
2.9
2.6
7.9
8.1
7.5
19.9
24.8
3.5
2.2 j
1948
3.4
3.9
9.0
14.1
9.1
18.6
15.4
4.6
3.5
1949
4.6
6.3
9.5
17.7
9.7
18.8
18.5
4.6
6.5
1950 Mar.
5.2
9.3
10.4
16.9
17.5
11.1
20.0
5.2
7.5
EXPORTS PROM BRITAIN (to) New So. Irish India, Rep. Prance Pakis. Aust. Zealand Canada Afr. Swed. Den. 11938
1.7
1.3
2.8
3.2
1.6
2.0
1.7
1.3
1.8
1946
3.3
2.9
6.6
4.6
2.3
2.8
3.0
3.9
4.8
1947
4.7
2.0
7.6
6.0
3.6
3.7
4.0
2.1
5.4,
f1948
5.3
2.8
9.6
12.1
4.4
6.0
5.5
2.6
6.9
1949
6.4
2.8
12.5
15.7
5.4
6.6
4.8
4.1
7.4 i
1950 ;Mar.
8.5
5.0
10.8
21.6
7.1
9.2
7.0
6.0 12.8 ’ i
APPENDIX F# WORLD OUTPUT OP GOAL AND LIGNITE (excluding Russia) Relative Share In World Output
1957 Index= 100 1946
1947
1937
1947
91
102
100
100
TJ. S.
120
137
35
48
Europe
74
82
52
42
Asia
60
69
9
5
132
125
4
4
World Total
Others
RATIONS OF DOMESTIC OUTPUT TO TOTAL CONSUMPTION OF SOLID FUEL (in per cent)
Belgium France Germany Italy Luxembourg Netherlands Great Britain Australia New Zealand India & Pakistan South Africa
1937
1946
1947
99 61 121 9 0 85 122 103 88 104 105
91 83 111 19 0 75 103 101 100 101 115
87 75 107 15 0 75 101 101 100 101 115
* Post-War Shortages of Food and Coal (Lake Succes New Yorks United Nations Department of Economic Affairs, 1948), July, 1948, pp. 19-22.
134 APPENDIX G*
COAL, STEEL, AND IRON PRODUCTION OP EUROPE AND THE UNITED STATES Coal Production-Monthly Average (Thousands of Metric Tons) Belgium Prance 1938 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 Jan.
2,465 1,319 1,898 2,033 2,223 2,321 2,483
5,074 3,065 4,588 4,647 4,655 5,456 6,018
Trizone Ger. Italy Neth. Nor. 11,413 2,957 4,495 5,927 7,253 8,603 9,327
123 63 97 114 81 92 97
1,124 425 693 842 919 975 1,051
25 .5 8 28 36 38 29
U. K.
U.S.A.
19,220 15,475 16,093 16,718 17,730 18,215 17,273
29,835 47,820 44,938 51,998 49,643 36,111 31,018
Iron Ore Production-Monthly Average (Thousands of Metric Tons)