504 33 349KB
English Year 2021
Report DMCA / Copyright
DOWNLOAD FILE
747 77 1MB Read more
This book makes a significant contribution to the on-going international dialogue on the meaning of concepts such as hum
1,210 142 2MB Read more
In this volume a cast of experts demonstrates that it is time to recognize human trafficking as an issue of human rights
159 60 1MB Read more
This collection of essays charts the question of how we might develop a democratic theory of international law. Characte
198 41 5MB Read more
At the very least it can help to unmask the arguments of dictators and their allies."
223 5 2MB Read more
This book is based on a conference organised jointly by the editors to mark the European Year of Disabled People. It exp
207 73 9MB Read more
This book is the result of a shared conviction of the necessity to advance the international discourse on criticism. Wha
170 42 5MB Read more
Do “human rights”—as embodied in constitutions, national laws, and international agreements—foster improvements in the l
649 80 6MB Read more
The “disappearance” and torture of many people during the worst days of the authoritarian regimes that ruled many Latin
166 87 2MB Read more
This article investigates on the concept of space, its production, use, and change processes, and uncovers the interrelations between social and spatical practices. Based on Lefebvre’s concept of the Right to the City, the article discussed two main spatial rights: the right to oeuvre and the right to appropriation. To justify these spatial rights on the ground of legal rights, a comparison method is used in this article and three main legal documents is set against each other. These documents are: the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the ‘World Charter for the Right to the City’ and the ‘European Declaration of Urban Rights’. As a result of this comparison 22 universal norms are identified. These norms and the awareness regarding them and their ethical and legal background can empower social / spatial activism and be used for performing and evaluating spatial practices. CONTEMPORARY URBAN AFFAIRS (2019), 3(2), 173-183. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2018.47x14
0 0 1012KB Read more