All the Rest is Propaganda (The God Series Book 12)

Table of contents :
All the Rest is Propaganda
Quotations
Table of Contents
The Illuminati
The Ancient Question
Where is Heaven?
The Desert of the Real
Atlas Shrugged
The Dictator Manifesto
The Sin Delusion
The Triumph of the Cockroaches
Immanentize the Eschaton
The Maniacs
Gnosticism
Why Do People Believe Nonsense?
The Madmen
The Love Delusion
The Suicide of Jesus Christ
Original Sin
The Harvest
Dangerous Knowledge
The Plot To Kill God
The Drunkenness of Noah
The Unrevealed God
The Revolution is Here. The Revolution is Now.
The Silent God
This is Sparta!!!
The Sin Business
Gnostic or Slave?
Hawks, Doves and Retaliators
The Real Illuminati
The Will to Power
Panopticon versus Synopticon
The Temple of God
The School for Scoundrels
Christianity: The League of Brainwashers
The Lizard Invasion
The Wages of Sin
Kairos
What is the New World Order?
The Bicameral Brain
How the Rich Became “Good”
“The Banality of Evil”
The First Eichmann
The Ape of God
The Jewish Schism
The Wolves
The Dead Ruling Over the Living
The Gothic
Who Guards God?
Behind the Gilded Curtain – A Hollywood Insider Blows the Whistle
The Passover Murderer
The Angel?
Leviathan
The Lost Temple
Gandalf
Holy War; Holy Murder
The Hieratic Conspiracy
George Washington and the Illuminati

Citation preview

All the Rest is Propaganda M P

H H

B

Copyright © Mike Hockney 2013 The right of Mike Hockney to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the author, except in the case of a reviewer, who may quote brief passages embodied in critical articles or in a review.

Quotations “All I’m out for is a good time – all the rest is propaganda.” – Alan Sillitoe, Saturday Night and Sunday Morning “If people in the media cannot decide whether they are in the business of reporting news or manufacturing propaganda, it is all the more important that the public understand that difference, and choose their news sources accordingly.” – Thomas Sowell “Moral passion without entertainment is propaganda, and entertainment without moral passion is television.” – Rita Mae Brown “It is well known that in war, the first casualty is truth – that during any war truth is forsaken for propaganda.” – Harry Browne “All over the place, from the popular culture to the propaganda system, there is constant pressure to make people feel that they are helpless, that the only role they can have is to ratify decisions and to consume.” – Noam Chomsky “The goal of modern propaganda is no longer to transform opinion but to arouse an active and mythical belief.” – Jacques Ellul “Propaganda is that branch of the art of lying which consists in nearly deceiving your friends without quite deceiving your enemies.” – Frances Cornford

Table of Contents All the Rest is Propaganda Quotations Table of Contents The Illuminati The Ancient Question Where is Heaven? The Desert of the Real Atlas Shrugged The Dictator Manifesto The Sin Delusion The Triumph of the Cockroaches Immanentize the Eschaton The Maniacs Gnosticism Why Do People Believe Nonsense? The Madmen The Love Delusion The Suicide of Jesus Christ Original Sin The Harvest Dangerous Knowledge

The Plot To Kill God The Drunkenness of Noah The Unrevealed God The Revolution is Here. The Revolution is Now. The Silent God This is Sparta!!! The Sin Business Gnostic or Slave? Hawks, Doves and Retaliators The Real Illuminati The Will to Power Panopticon versus Synopticon The Temple of God The School for Scoundrels Christianity: The League of Brainwashers The Lizard Invasion The Wages of Sin Kairos What is the New World Order? The Bicameral Brain How the Rich Became “Good” “The Banality of Evil”

The First Eichmann The Ape of God The Jewish Schism The Wolves The Dead Ruling Over the Living The Gothic Who Guards God? Behind the Gilded Curtain – A Hollywood Insider Blows the Whistle The Passover Murderer The Angel? Leviathan The Lost Temple Gandalf Holy War; Holy Murder The Hieratic Conspiracy George Washington and the Illuminati

The Illuminati This is one of a series of books outlining the cosmology, philosophy, ontology, epistemology, politics and religion of the ancient and controversial secret society known as the Illuminati, of which the Greek polymath Pythagoras was the first official Grand Master. The society exists to this day.

The Moment of Truth

The most important moment in religious history was when Pontius Pilate asked Jesus Christ, “What is truth?” This was the ideal opportunity for “God” to finally explain reality and truth to humanity. What, then, was Christ’s answer? Er, nothing. That dreadful silence reveals everything about mainstream religion and its inability to explain anything. You won’t find the truth in the Torah, Bible, Koran, or any of the sacred texts of the East. What you will find is plenty of commandments, prohibitions, rules and instructions for ways of living. You will be told what to wear, what to eat, even which hand you should use to wipe your ass. You won’t find any science, mathematics or rationalist philosophy. Neither God nor prophets nor popes nor gurus can define the truth. That’s a fact. The world is awash with lies, interpretations, conjectures, opinions, beliefs, hypotheses, deceptions, illusions, delusions, bluffs, cons, manipulations. How can you possibly know what is true amongst all of this “noise”, this eternal babble? Should you rely on your feelings (faith), or the evidence of your senses (science), or your intuitions (mysticism), or your reason (rationalist metaphysics)? How do you know which approach is right when they frequently fatally contradict each other? How do we escape from subjectivity and find something objective upon which we can all agree? There are two opposing paths: truth and propaganda. Anything that is not true is propaganda. This book is the story of the relentless propaganda to which we are all continually subjected. It’s the story of grotesque religious, political, economic, social and psychological lies. Yet there is absolute truth – it really does exist – and we shall conclude this book with the answer that Jesus Christ would have given Pontius Pilate had he truly been God.

The Ancient Question Ancient religion and philosophy were ultimately concerned with just one thing: how does an ordered universe (“cosmos”) emerge either from primordial disorder (Chaos) or from nothing at all? Religions invoked “the gods”. Even Chaos was a god and it could give birth to other gods, and, from them, order could emerge.

The philosophers of ancient Greece replaced anthropomorphic gods with natural forces. Abrahamism said that all that initially existed was “God” and he made everything else out of nothing whatsoever. Plato used an eternal Demiurge to create the cosmos from Chaos (unformed matter) by sculpting it into a copy (simulacrum) of the domain of eternal, perfect, immutable Forms. Aristotle posited a cosmos that was finite in space but eternal in time, sustained by a First Cause (“God”) that continuously caused the Universe to exist. (In Abrahamism, the First Cause brings everything else into existence in a Creation Event, whereas the Aristotelian First Cause sustains everything eternally). In Aristotle’s universe, there’s an implication that a process of evolution occurred infinitely long ago, but, once it ended, it resulted in an unchanging, perfect order – a great chain of being – in which everything had its allotted place and there was no scope for anything to appear in, or disappear from, this settled Order. Thus, further evolution long since became impossible: every conceivable vacancy was already filled. The most remarkable thing is that modern scientific materialism has in no way improved on the thinking and speculations of the ancients. Scientists talk about space, time and matter erupting out of “nothing” in a Big Bang event but can provide absolutely no sufficient reason, cause or explanation for such an event and simply invoke “randomness” – whatever that is! They then go further and state that any possible random event can happen (“Anything that can happen will happen”; “Anything not forbidden is compulsory”) and invoke a “Multiverse” – an infinite set of universes – to cater for every conceivable eventuality. We just happen to live in one of these infinite universes that supports life (the vast majority don’t). Is the Multiverse the “answer” to life, the universe and everything, or does it horrifically reveal the inability of science to explain anything in any ultimate sense? In Multiverse thinking, “explanation” is replaced by the non-explanation of randomness. Causality is abandoned. The principle of sufficient reason is rejected. Science asserts that we do not live in a universe that has a sufficient reason, a sufficient cause, a sufficient explanation. Instead, we live in a meaningless, pointless, purposeless universe that is nothing but a bewildering random accident. In science, things don’t happen for a reason. They happen because they are possible and have a certain probability associated with them.

Improbable things are less likely than probable things, but certainly aren’t impossible, hence the most fantastical outcomes are compulsory – just like magic. It’s hard to see how scientists can legitimately exclude God unless they can show how such a concept is strictly forbidden in their ridiculous Multiverse of all conceivable possibilities. To be a scientist means to absolutely reject reason and embrace irrationalism. Scientists might as well agree with Luther that reason is the Devil’s whore. Scientists have contempt for reason and prefer nonexplanations involving randomness and statistics over explanations involving precise cause and reason. Compared with the ancients, they have actually regressed! With science, we are further away than ever from a valid, rational explanation of existence. We are now expected to shrug our shoulders and simply say, “Shit happens: every possible shit, infinite shit in a Multiverse of all conceivable shit!” If science’s claims are rationally investigated, what science states is that there’s an unreal, unobservable, immaterial, eternal and universal abstract mathematical entity outside space and time known as the “wavefunction”. This wavefunction is the true Multiverse since it contains everything that’s possible. We might say that this wavefunction is nothing but the ancient concept of Chaos (pure potential but no actualisation) given a modern, glossy mathematical makeover. This wavefunction – via a process that can only be described as “magic” (since science doesn’t attempt to offer any credible explanation) – miraculously and mysteriously “collapses” into an actual reality, i.e. from all the infinite possibilities, certain ones become real and form the world of our experience. Frankly, if you believe science, you’ll believe anything. You might as well believe in God since he’s no more ridiculous than the “answer” (or non-answer) science gives. Abrahamism says an inexplicable being called “God” is responsible for everything. Science says an inexplicable non-being called “randomness” is responsible for everything. Both notions are as silly as each other. All of this nonsense is swept away by ontological mathematics, which enshrines the principle of sufficient reason, is a system of absolute deterministic causality (but in an extraordinary way that permits free will – see the rest of the God Series for precise details), which provides an exact

explanation for everything, and which wholly rejects randomness as playing any role at all in reality. Mathematics is the one and only explanation of reality. Science, like religion and mythology, offers no explanation. It relies on magic and miracles – on rabbits popping out of top hats for no reason. It’s time for rationalism. It’s time for causality. It’s time for explanation. It’s time for ontological mathematics in which the universe is literally made out of mathematics. We inhabit a 100% mathematical universe and we ourselves are mathematical “monads” – souls! In ontological mathematics, “nothing” is an entirely mathematical concept and corresponds to an immaterial, dimensionless, frequency domain of mathematical energy outside space and time, defined by Euler’s Formula (the God Equation). “Positive” frequencies are exactly balanced by “negative” frequencies, leading to a universe of net zero (the state we know as “nothing”). This is Descartes’ unextended universe of mind. By way of Fourier mathematics (which is a logical, mathematical application of Euler’s Formula), mental frequency information can be presented in terms of a dimensional, spacetime universe (the universe of matter). The Cartesian problem of how unextended mind interacts with extended matter is entirely explained by Fourier mathematics. It’s all in the math! The Big Bang was a Fourier mathematical event whereby the Fourier frequency domain of mind gave birth to the Fourier spacetime domain of matter. Nothing “random” took place. Nothing sprang randomly out of nonexistence, unreality or out of mathematical abstraction. The mathematical universe is immortal and indestructible – exactly the same as the soul. As above, so below. Ontological mathematics embraces all numbers including negative numbers, imaginary numbers, zero and infinity. Spacetime is defined by complex numbers, not real numbers (as in science). “Time” is simply imaginary space. The mathematical universe is a dynamic universe of becoming. Everything is in permanent mathematical motion – this is the true First Law of Motion. There is absolute conservation of energy, and the total energy of the universe is always zero due to negative energy perfectly balancing positive energy. Ontological mathematics explains everything precisely, without any need for faith, magic, mystery, mysticism, miracles, a Creator God, or

scientific “randomness”. Crucially, ontological mathematics is idealist, rationalist, and panpsychic. It’s not materialist, empiricist and observationbased and defined, i.e. ontological mathematics involves mathematical rationalist unobservables: mathematical entities that will never be accessible to any Large Hadron Colliders. Above all, ontological mathematics is founded on the mathematical monad – the immortal, uncreated, autonomous soul. Mathematics, and only mathematics, explains religion and grounds it in the evolving soul, not in any perfect “God”. Religion is not about “God”. It’s about the self-solving, self-optimising soul. Religion is Evolutionary, not Creationist. “God” does not make souls. Eternal souls metamorphose into Gods! “God” is simply the Omega Point that all evolving souls eventually reach. God is the meaning of life because God is what we are all becoming ... some of us much faster than others! This is an equal opportunities universe, but not a universe of equal outcomes. Some souls – a few outliers – are way ahead of the curve. They are close to gods while most others are mere beasts.

Satanists There’s a catastrophic conceptual error at the heart of the supposed war between good and evil. “God” rewards his followers in heaven, while Satan punishes his followers in hell. How does it make any sense that Satan, who wants to recruit the souls that reject God, should adopt the policy of torturing these same souls rather than embracing them? Imagine how different Abrahamism would be if it was said that Satan liberally rewarded everyone who rejected “God” and that “hell” was full of joy and merriment, of eternal delights. With “Satanists”, no one imagines that they worship Satan in order to be eternally punished by him. Clearly, they worship him because they see him as a better God than “God” and they want to be with him and rewarded by him. It would be perverse and indeed insane if those who follow the Devil expect to be tortured by him. In Abrahamism, the “Devil” is actually an employee of God. He’s in charge of God’s torture chamber and his task is to “test” all souls and see whether they are faithful to God. Those “virtuous” souls that cannot be tempted by Satan go to heaven and those souls that are successfully lured by Satan are then punished by Satan, which seems somewhat ungrateful!

Why shouldn’t Satan be completely independent of “God” rather than his torturer and tester? Why shouldn’t Satan reward his followers and punish his enemies, just as “God” does? And, in fact, isn’t that exactly what we see in the real world? Every side offers pleasure to its supporters and pain to its enemies. No side ever says, “We’ll punish you if you reject the other side, our hated enemy.” It’s ridiculous and wholly unnatural. So, what we have is a bizarre system whereby God’s sworn enemy is actually helping God by torturing everyone who rejects God and chooses to come over to his side. Why would he do such a crazy thing? No one ever punishes his own supporters. Do you see what’s really going on? In Abrahamism, “Satan” and “God” are actually one and the same person. Specifically, Satan is God’s Shadow. If you do what God wants, God admits you to paradise. If you don’t do what he wants, his Shadow punishes you in hell. That makes perfect sense, doesn’t it? Consider the Bible. Isn’t the Old Testament all about God’s Shadow (Satan) rather than God himself, while the New Testament is about God rather than his Shadow? The Old Testament God is about power, hate and violence while the New Testament God is about powerlessness, love and peace. Plainly, they cannot be the same God, but they can be God as Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde: two opposite aspects of the same God. In this light, the baffling Islamic tale of Abraham and Ishmael suddenly makes perfect sense. The evil version of God orders Abraham to perform human sacrifice, and the good version of God pleads with him not to. What we are encountering is an internal struggle between God’s two sides – good and evil – not between two different beings. Doesn’t the whole of Abrahamism become much more logical if it’s seen as a titanic struggle between a fractured psyche – a schizophrenic God, a lunatic deity? This “God” of course reflects humanity’s own inner conflict between the Freudian id and superego. Abrahamism is about the human psyche and its problems, and this is manifested in the bizarre God of Abrahamism who usually seems more like Satan than God, just as humans are usually cruel and selfish rather than decent and altruistic. If there were a being called God and a polar opposite, independent being called Satan, God would reward his own followers, and punish any of the enemy that he captured, while Satan would do exactly the same in reverse.

This produces an entirely different religious picture. “Heaven” is where God rewards his supporters, and he has a torture chamber in it called “hell” where he punishes the supporters of Satan. Exactly the same is true for Satan. He rewards his followers and punishes any of God’s supporters he captures. Doesn’t that provide a 100% demolition of Abrahamism? Even if you are a perfect follower of God, you could end up in the Devil’s torture chamber (if he captures you), rather than God’s heaven. It would make religion totally different if no one were guaranteed a place in heaven for doing God’s bidding; if hell and eternal punishment were still a real possibility no matter how “good” you were. Why shouldn’t Satan capture “good” souls? Why shouldn’t God capture “evil” souls? Of course, Abrahamism is set up in such a way that God cannot punish anyone, only reward them with heaven. Someone else has to do the punishing, hence “Satan”. But if Satan is God’s sworn enemy why would he do God’s punishing for him? Why wouldn’t he reward those who rejected God, exactly as he’d done? They’re on his side. They’re allies, not souls to be punished. Abrahamism promotes a notion that the “good guys” can never punish anyone, but Abrahamism is also based on the eternal punishment of the “bad guys”. So, the logic, or rather illogic, of Abrahamism requires the bad guys to organise their own punishment. But why would they? What’s in it for them? Moreover, the bad guy head honcho is supposed to be the punisher in chief. But why would he punish people who had disobeyed God? Why wouldn’t he have a party with them? Abrahamism is wholly devoid of sense. It uses God’s enemy to do God’s dirty work even though there’s no conceivable reason why he would. It’s God who does the judging and Satan who does the punishing. Why doesn’t God have the guts, honesty and integrity to do his own punishing of those he has judged? It’s God, not Satan, who sends souls to hell, so why should Satan punish them? That’s incomprehensible. They haven’t done anything against him. In fact, they have shown that they share his sacred anti-God cause. Consider how different Abrahamism would look if you could support either God or Satan and be rewarded by either with eternal paradise. There would no longer be any overriding incentive to worship God. People would

be faced with a genuine choice. Perhaps Satan would offer a far more enjoyable paradise than God. Abrahamism is entirely predicated on being horrifically punished for disobeying God and, insanely, it’s God’s chief enemy Satan who does the punishing. What if, instead of punishing you, Satan rewarded you with every pleasure conceivable? What if you were actively incentivised for rejecting God? The logic of Abrahamism is that you are rewarded for obeying God and punished for disobeying him. But that all changes if you are instead rewarded for disobeying God. Why wouldn’t Satan reward you? Why would he help out the being (God) he hates more than all others? It’s God that hates the souls that have disobeyed him, not Satan. If anything, Satan loves these souls. The last thing he would do is torture them for rebelling against God (following his own example and leadership). Satan doesn’t punish his “demons and devils” and his fellow fallen angels, so why would he punish “fallen” souls? Abrahamism is a ludicrous, irrational story that people don’t laugh at simply because they have been so heavily brainwashed by it. Abrahamism is like the Spanish Inquisition. The Inquisitors didn’t kill anyone. What they did was judge heretics and find them guilty, then hand them over to the secular arm to do the actual killing and burning. But no rational person can deny that the Inquisitors were morally responsible and accountable for the deaths. The secular arm would have done nothing without the judgment of the Inquisition. Moreover, the secular arm were in complete cahoots with the Inquisition. They were enthusiastic advocates of the work of the Inquisition. With “God”, he passes judgment on souls and then passes them over to be punished, and he gets none other than Satan – his sworn enemy – to carry out the sentence. God is as guilty as the Spanish Inquisition. He’s a monster and torturer claiming that there’s no blood on his hands, and he even gets his enemy to execute his dread sentences for him. If God judges then he himself must punish. Anything else is immoral. Anything else is cowardice. And the very last person the True God would hand over any soul to is Satan. Apparently, 98.7% of the human race are sentenced to hell. Why doesn’t Satan simply make them his army and attack heaven? What we know for

sure is that if Satan doesn’t punish anyone then no one else will. Punishing is apparently against God’s religion!

***** “But, if Satan punishes bad people, does that not make him good?” – Anonymous So, if Satan rewards bad people that does make him bad? Here’s the logic table: Satan punishes bad people, so Satan is “good”. Satan rewards bad people, so Satan is “bad”. Satan rewards good people, so Satan is “good”. Satan punishes good people, so Satan is “bad”. Well, which is it? Why on earth would Satan punish people for disobeying “God” when that’s precisely what he did himself? If you hate God, why would you punish everyone else who hates “God”?

***** It’s essential for Abrahamism to deny that you have a choice. After all, if choosing “Satan” over “God” had no adverse consequences, you would then have to seriously ask yourself why you should choose God. You would have to read the respective manifestos of Satan and God and decide which you preferred, and that’s no good to Abrahamism. The tale of the Tree Knowledge is a classic Abrahamist choice scenario. If you eat the fruit of the tree, you go to hell. If you don’t, you go to heaven. So, logic says you shouldn’t eat the fruit. However, if eating the fruit makes you a God and has zero adverse effects, you’d be insane not to. The Abrahamic test of faith is another classic. If Abraham doesn’t agree to make a human sacrifice of his own son, he has defied “God” and will go to hell. If he agrees to carry out the horrific deed, he goes to heaven. But what if Abraham earns his place in heaven precisely because he refuses to carry out God’s order to murder his son? Abrahamism would collapse if disobeying God was the right thing to do!

What Abrahamism is determined to say is that you win if you obey God and lose if you disobey. But what if you win by disobeying God? If that idea were ever to take hold, Abrahamism could not survive. The whole intent of Abrahamism is to rule out the possibility that disobeying God can ever have good outcomes. If it can, Abrahamism is automatically finished. People are Abrahamists because they are terrified of not being Abrahamists. They are petrified of the hellish consequences. If that threat is removed, Abrahamism loses its trump card. Who in their right mind would obey “God” if they didn’t have to, and if they could get to paradise anyway?

The Anarchy Fallacy The world consists of three types of people: hawks (predators; dominants), doves (prey, submissives) and retaliators (autonomous; capable of responding extremely aggressively to hawkish attacks on them). According to anarchists, the natural state of people is to be dovelike, and government is inherently full of hawks wickedly preying on the people. The solution, they say, is to overthrow government and thus get rid of the rapacious hawk predators. In fact, it’s government that keeps the hawks in check and prevents a world of brutal warlords ruling over everyone else, as is seen in many failed states in the Muslim world (such as Somalia, Afghanistan and Pakistan). However, it’s true to say that government historically has never been just, fair, rational, honest or moral. All governments have been bad, yet few of them have been worse than the chaos anarchy would certainly deliver. Governments have always taken the side of a hawkish elite – be it oligarchs, a priest caste, optimates, patricians, nobles, aristocracy, royalty, knights, bourgeoisie, capitalists, the owner class, entrepreneurs, bankers, the super rich. These have always preyed on the poor and average. However, they have done so within a system of laws, albeit an unfair system, and there has never been an anarchic free-for-all where pure jungle violence has reigned. The world has been unfair and unequal forever but it has not been continuously bestial – which is what anarchy would provide since anarchy has no means at all to stop or curb the hawks. The task is to establish good, just, fair, rational government by retaliators rather than hawks (doves, it must be noted, are incapable of governing; they

are followers, not leaders). Hawk governments (or weak puppet governments established by hawk puppetmasters) support hawk elites. Only retaliator governments will ensure that hawks do not take over. What is 100% inheritance tax? It’s retaliation against the rich hawk elite. What is “rebooting” the world all about? – retaliating against the privileged elites who have always run the world in their own interests. There will never be a world of doves, and of the dovelike “love and light” of which the left wing anarchists absurdly dream. They have never addressed the hawk problem, and they never will. The central issue is how to deal with the hawks, how to control the hawks, how to utilise their energy for the general good rather than for their own particular good. Only government can solve that problem, and only government by retaliators rather than by hawks. Left wing anarchists live in a fantasy world. They have failed to understand human nature and that makes their naive, simplistic ideas incredibly dangerous. As for right wing anarchists, they themselves are the hawks. They want all rules, laws, regulations and governments to be removed, precisely to allow them to feed on the weak and poor at their pleasure and leisure, with total impunity. Only two types of people want anarchism – the right wing hawks, and the mad left wing doves that imagine that government itself is the source of hawkishness. It’s not: hawks are the sole cause of hawkishness. Government is the only possible antidote, government, that is, that’s not tied to the interests of hawks. Capitalism is a wholly hawk economic system. Communism, in theory, is a dove economic system. Democracy is ostensibly a dovelike political system, but when it’s combined with capitalism, the capitalist hawks seize control, exactly as we see in countries such as America and Britain where democratic politicians are puppets for the rich controllers (the puppetmasters). Communism ought to be a dovelike political system but in practice is controlled by a cynical, self-serving hawk elite. Fascism, Nazism, nationalism and patriotism are extremely hawkish. Theocracies are extremely hawkish. Monarchies, dictatorships and oligarchies are extremely hawkish. Meritocracy and social capitalism are not dovelike in the slightest, but nor are they hawkish. They are retaliatory. Meritocracy supports a position of neutrality in the public space and equal opportunities for all, and will

retaliate against anyone who tries to break neutrality (such as religious fanatics imposing their religious symbols and standards on others), and anyone who seeks to subvert equal opportunities (such as privileged elites and their system of inheritance to perpetuate inequality across the generations). Ayn Rand’s anarcho-capitalist libertarians are out-and-out hawks. Incredibly, in Atlas Shrugged, Rand tried to portray the rich elites as the “good guys” being put upon by a nasty socialist government defending “looters and moochers”. Rand’s capitalist elite advocate the “virtue of selfishness”, and they believe this makes them admirable! All free-market capitalists are hawks. All privileged elites are hawks. Most conspiracy theorists see themselves as retaliators but are in fact hawks seeking to destroy government and establish a hawk anarchy, in which they (so they imagine) will have the advantage, the whip hand. Hawks see government as something that unfairly curbs them. Mad doves see government as something that hawkishly oppresses them. Government is in truth the one and only defence against the hawks. Government needs to be extremely strong and extremely retaliatory against the elites (and this is exactly what happened in the French Revolution where many thousands of rapacious hawks were executed, including the hawk chiefs: the king and queen). Left wingers are always doves or retaliators. Right wingers are always hawks. Centrists tend to be liberal hawks. Hawks are on the side of the Freudian Id and the Pleasure Principle, and doves on the side of the Freudian Superego and Morality Principle. Retaliators are rationalists on the side of the Freudian Ego and the Reality Principle. Hawks are religious, economic or political fundamentalists while doves are religious and spiritual, but not much interested in politics or economics. Retaliators are atheists, agnostics, skeptics and Gnostics. They are interested in mathematics, science and philosophy. Hawks are inner-directed, doves are other- and tradition-directed and retaliators are autonomous. The master-slave dialectic is all about hawks (masters) and slaves (doves). Retaliators are either outside the master-slave system, or former slaves who have at last decided to fight back with extreme force against the

masters. The French and Russian Revolutions were about lethal retaliation against the hawk elites. The hawks are secretly terrified of the retaliators, and encourage “dove morality” as much as possible. The Christian notions of “turn the other cheek”, “love thy neighbour” and “render unto Caesar” are pure dove ideas, and music to the ears of the hawks who know that the doves will never oppose them while they believe such nonsense. Retaliators, on the other hand, say, “An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.” No retaliator is apologetic about the French Revolutionary Terror. After all, it was exactly what the French hawk elite deserved. The retaliators don’t weep about the Holocaust given that the Jews themselves worship an exterminatory God, who, by his own account, ordered fathers to kill their children, wiped out almost the whole world in the Great Flood, slaughtered the Canaanites and stole their land from them, and butchered the firstborn of Egypt without a second thought. Judaism and Islam are two extremely hawkish religions because they seek to ally themselves with the ultimate hawk (Satan). Satan is the god of hawks, while Christianity (according to its own propaganda) is the religion of doves. Gnosticism is the religion of retaliators and explicitly says that the world is ruled by servants of the Demiurge (evil hawk archons). So, what are you – hawk, dove or retaliator? There’s no point in lying to yourself. Your whole worldview is predicated on the type to which you belong. In essence, the world is and always has been ruled by hawks (masters; extraverted dominants) and it’s the task of the retaliators (introverted dominants) to overthrow the hawks and rule fairly, justly and rationally in the interests of all. The slaves (extraverted and introverted submissives) are incapable of saving themselves and often actively support the hawks that prey on them (as in Islam, free-market capitalism and monarchy).

***** What is the function of good government? – to optimise each and every citizen under its care and give all of them the best possible chance to lead the most fulfilled lives of which they are capable; to retaliate to maximum effect against all forces that seek to subvert and prevent that aim. Good government is always for the General Will and against particular wills.

What is the function of bad government? – to support the elites that currently run society, and to control and regulate everyone else. Everyone outside the elite is given a sub-optimal education, a sub-optimal living environment and sub-optimal chances of doing well in life. Bad government enshrines inequality and unequal opportunities and panders at all times to the rich elites that fund and lobby the politicians. Bad government always wants to regulate the people but to remove all regulation from the rich elites. Cui bono? Bad government is always for particular wills (of the elites) and against the General Will of the people. What is the function of no government (anarchy)? – to indulge a ridiculous dream that human beings are self-regulating and self-organising and achieve this only when government is removed. Anarchism and libertarianism are intimately related and are opposed to any central authority (Leviathan) that all must obey for the common good. They believe that the common good comes about spontaneously when there is no central power. History has not shown a single shred of evidence that this belief is anything other than mad.

***** The Republican Party, the Tea Party, the 9/11 “Truth” Movement, Randian anarcho-capitalist libertarians, free-market capitalists and Protestant Fundamentalist are all evil hawks. They have utterly ruined America and made it ungovernable.

***** What is the optimal world? It’s one with zero hawks, zero doves and 100% of retaliators. A world purely of retaliators can act like a world of doves (and have all of the benefits of that), and yet have the capacity to instantly root out and suppress any hawks that appear in the population (that would run amok if they had only doves to contend with).

Faith What is faith? It’s the power of the heart. It’s all about feelings. What is science? It’s the power of observation and experiments. It’s all about the senses. What is Eastern mysticism? It’s the power of inner visions. It’s all

about intuition. What is rationalism? It’s the power of reason. It’s all about thinking. Feelings, the senses, intuition and thinking are not equal partners. They don’t all lead to the same truth. In fact, they lead to totally different and frequently opposite “truths”. Feelings (faith) can tell us about truth only if we inhabit a universe of emotion, which we don’t. The senses can tell us about truth only if we inhabit an exclusively sensible world, without any hidden variables or rational unobservables. We don’t. Mysticism can tell us about truth only if inhabit a world of visions and intuitions and “Eureka” moments. We don’t. The truth is that we live in an intelligible world, and reason, intellect and thinking are our means for investigating it. Intuitions can be highly useful, the senses can offer us vital clues, but feelings are absolutely useless. Humanity, being in thrall to feelings, has created a world of faith and Mythos (emotional stories). This is a wholly false world, a world or fantasy, delusion and wishful thinking. Humanity can progress only when all human beings are rational first and emotional second rather than emotional first and rational last. Abrahamism – the most powerful religion in the world – is all about the heart (faith; feelings; identity). It’s the absolute enemy of reason. It’s driven by ancient stories (Mythos) long since refuted by science. Of course, what science can’t do is refute feelings and delusions. How can you use scientific arguments to stop a Jew wailing in front of the Wailing Wall, a Muslim grovelling on Hajj at Mecca, or a Christian blessing himself and weeping when he’s presented with a plank of wood of the “true cross”? Science is without a voice in the mad world of feelings. Capitalist consumerism is all about feelings: “Oh I want this, I must have that, it will make me feel better.” Advertising specifically targets feelings: “With this product, you will be more popular, more successful, have better sex, have a better life, have higher status, feel better.” So, irrational feelings are at the root of the global economy. Irrational feelings are at the root of religion. Irrational feelings are at the root of identity. Irrational feelings are at the root of art, music, entertainment. Hollywood is a feeling factory. It tells you nothing about Logos. People crave feelings. Love, romance and flirting are all about feelings. Heaven and hell are all about the notion of maximum pleasure (desired) and maximum pain (feared).

Nepotism, cronyism, privilege and inheritance are all about feelings. They are about helping your family and friends over everyone else, about harming the people you either don’t know (hence have no feelings towards) or actively hate (hence are happy to do them harm). Feelings – the power of the heart, the power of faith, the power of the blood (of family or tribe) – is the axis around which the world revolves. And that’s the whole problem with humanity. We live in an irrational world of the heart (Dionysian) rather than a rational world of the head (Apollonian). Religions and conspiracy theories are laughable, idiotic, irrational drivel, but they have an immensely powerful emotional core. Conspiracy theories are a perverted version of Gnosticism. The Gnostics explained the existence of evil by saying that the world was created and ruled by the Devil (the Abrahamic God). Conspiracy theorists explain the existence of evil by saying that our world is created and controlled by Jews, Jesuits, socialist elites, the European Union, Reptilians, the “Illuminati”, Washington D.C. – take your pick. Of course, the truth is that the world is ruled by feelings, and reason is wholly absent. It’s reason that will solve humanity’s problems, not stories and tears.

Adults Adults are just children who have learned to mask their emotions. Remove the mask and they revert to hysterical, terrified children. The purpose of religion – of God – is to offer them fatherly, parental protection and reassurance. The monster hiding in the dark closet can be defeated, so says “God”. Isn’t it time adults grew up and lost their fear of the dark and of the scary monsters?

The Heroic Age The Golden Age involved the humanity created by the first gods (the Titans). When the new gods took over (the Olympians), the golden human race was replaced by silver humanity, a far inferior race. Zeus later replaced them with Bronze humanity. These destroyed themselves in savage wars. Then came the Heroic Age and the Homeric men of great deeds. But finally Zeus made the humans of the Iron Age, the worst humans of them all, and

the ones that still exist today. To get back to paradise – the Golden Age – we must have a rebirth of Heroes, who will then overcome the vile Iron Age men who rule our world.

Where is Heaven? The ancients conceived of hell as beneath the surface of the Earth, and heaven as an inaccessible island of perfection across an ocean impassable to the living, but still very much on Earth. Eventually, heaven was raised to the celestial plane, but was still a physical location. Hell too was relocated to some cosmic abyss. Still later, heaven and hell were conceived as nonphysical, beyond the reach of science. Science has relentlessly hounded religious conceptions of heaven and hell away from Earth and into other dimensions, or to no dimension at all. To have any credibility, religion must be able to explain different dimensionality, or dimensionless existence. However, if you pick up the Torah, Bible or Koran, you will find not one reference to the problem of dimensionality. You will find no mention of mathematics, science or metaphysics. Instead, you will hear tales of primitive desert tribes and talking asses, you will hear parables, psalms, songs, poems, prayers, prophecies, commandments, religious customs, prohibitions and permissions – all pure Mythos. What you won’t hear is one word of Logos – reason. Is “God” allergic to Logos? He must be ... because he never mentions it once. What kind of God expects his worshippers to be satisfied with Mythos and no Logos? Why does God refuse to mathematically and scientifically explain anything? Why isn’t the Bible an infallible book of quantum mechanics? Who cares about Jews and Jewish prophets? Are mathematicians smarter than God? All the evidence says they are. Any moron can understand Mythos. Only intelligent people can understand Logos. We have plenty of Mythos Gods, but where is the Logos God? “God” has never once employed Logos rather than Mythos. Why not? Because Logos means that rational arguments must be deployed and the last thing that Gods, priests, popes, preachers and prophets want to be dragged into is having to defend their beliefs rationally.

God hides behind Mythos because all charlatans and con men do. Faith hides every rational error. “I believe” means “I don’t acknowledge reason.” “I believe” means “I live my life according to stories (Mythos) rather than reason (Logos).” “I believe” means “I am a feeling and sensing type; I am not a thinking and intuitive type.” Followers of Mythos religion are always stupid, and have much lower IQs than atheists. The only people with higher IQs than atheists are advocates of Logos religion – based on mathematics.

The Elite Our cognitive map is how we arrange the world around us, how we imagine it, how we interpret it, how we talk about it, how we relate to it. It’s what we take for granted. It reinforces a common mindset and facilitates groupthink. It goes hand in hand with tunnel vision, the inability to see a wider picture. An elite stays in power not just by controlling the means of production and capital assets, but, especially, by controlling the way we think, by shaping our cognitive map to reflect their ideology. Our cognitive map is so deeply internalised that it’s rarely commented upon (except by philosophers and sociologists). The cognitive map controls our unconscious mind as much as our consciousness. It controls not just what we talk about in public but what we don’t talk about, i.e. the social silences, the areas that lie outside the public discourse, things that don’t need to be said because they are taken so much for granted.

Understanding “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.” – Upton Sinclair It is difficult to get people to think when their position in life depends on not thinking. Religion requires you not to think. That’s the only way in which people can retain their faith. Social silence is all about that terrain where we are required not to understand things, not to think too deeply about them. The moment you are against the social silence, and opposed to its conclusions, you are an outsider and rebel, and life becomes tough. You simply don’t buy the propaganda anymore.

George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four is a fantastic exploration of how the elite control the social silence. In Orwell’s book, the elite invented a new language called New Speak, the purpose of which was to reduce the vocabulary and grammar so much that it enormously limited the amount of concepts that could be thought and spoken. This language was intended to make it literally impossible for people to think heretical thoughts since there would be no words and grammar to reflect such thoughts. That’s what the elite’s relentless campaign to dumb down everyone is all about. Stupid people can’t be subversive. They can’t formulate revolutionary ideas. Clever people, people who can think, have led all revolutions. Orwell’s concept of doublethink goes to the heart of totalitarianism. You must understand what is being said and what is not being said and accept both even when they directly contradict each other. It’s necessary, for example, to swear your allegiance to democracy and have total faith in it, while knowing that you have no say over anything and no power to change a single thing, and that everything is always run by an entrenched rich oligarchy, as it always has been. The elite control the silence. They control the unspoken. They control the subtext. They control the unconscious. They control the cognitive map. They control how you think and the framework in which you think. If you want to be free then you must control the way you think. You must control your own cognitive map. You must get involved in what people don’t say as well as what they do. The unsaid is even more important than what is said.

The Desert of the Real “We feel free because we lack the very language to articulate our unfreedom.” – Slavoj Žižek, Welcome to the Desert of the Real “At all levels of our life we seem to live more and more with the thing deprived of its substance. You get beer without alcohol, meat without fat, coffee without caffeine ... and even virtual sex without sex. Virtual reality to me is the climax of this process: you now get reality without reality ... or a totally regulated reality. But there is another side to this. Throughout the entire twentieth century, I see a counter-tendency, for which my good philosopher friend Alain Badiou invented a nice name: ‘La passion du réel’,

the passion of the real. That is to say, precisely because the universe in which we live is somehow a universe of dead conventions and artificiality, the only authentic real experience must be some extremely violent, shattering experience. And this we experience as a sense that now we are back in real life.” – Slavoj Žižek “...there is passive nihilism, what Nietzsche called ‘The last man’ – just living a stupid, self-satisfied life without great passions.” – Slavoj Žižek “I do claim that what is sold to us today as freedom is something from which this more radical dimension of freedom and democracy has been removed – in other words, the belief that basic decisions about social development are discussed or brought about involving as many as possible, a majority. In this sense, we do not have an actual experience of freedom today. Our freedoms are increasingly reduced to the freedom to choose your lifestyle. You can even choose your ethnic identity up to a point. “But this new world of freedom described by people like Ulrich Beck, who say everything is a matter of reflective negotiation, of choice, can include new unfreedom. My favourite example is this, and here we have ideology at its purest: we know that it is very difficult today in more and more professional domains to get a long-term job. Academics or journalists, for example, now often live on a two-or three-year contract, that you then have to renegotiate. Of course, most of us experience this as something traumatising, shocking, where you can never be sure. But then, along comes the postmodern ideologist: ‘Oh, but this is just a new freedom, you can reinvent yourself every two years!’ “The problem for me is how unfreedom is hidden, concealed in precisely what is presented to us as new freedoms. I think that the explosion of these new freedoms, which fall under the domain of what Michel Foucault called ‘care of the self’, involves greater social unfreedom. “Twenty or 30 years ago there was still discussion as to whether the future would be fascist, socialist, communist or capitalist. Today, nobody even discusses this. These fundamental social choices are simply no longer perceived as a matter to decide. A certain domain of radical social questions has simply been depoliticised.” – Slavoj Žižek

*****

We have been bombarded with the illusion of freedom. We are told we can freely choose our government, and yet all governments in democracies are more or less the same, bar a few minor policies. They all subscribe to freemarket capitalism and it is this, not government, that dictates the economic health of a nation and the employment rate. Governments tinker with trivial details while the big picture is completely out of their control and in the hands of the corporations and banks. We can do what we want on the internet. We can say what we want. We can choose whatever consumer items we want that are in our price range. It all amounts to a strong feeling of freedom, and yet we all know that everything that really matters – the nature of the world we live in – is completely out of our control and under the control of others. They are free – meaningfully free –while we are not. Their genius is to give us the simulacrum of freedom, and that is sufficient for most. As with Cypher in The Matrix, the fake steak tastes so much better than the real food on offer. Radical freedom means taking control of your own life, accepting full accountability and responsibility for it. Freedom is hard. For most people, freedom-lite, virtual freedom, phoney freedom – the freedom to consume and choose from the menu of bread and circuses offered by the elite – is all they want. They are content for the elite to remain fully in charge, and, in effect, to be their slaves. They are not free, but unfree.

Success The elite seek not to be scrutinized by others. All of their business affairs are hidden. There is no transparency concerning their assets and what taxes they pay. Money is regarded as the “proof” that they are successful and that they deserve to be powerful and influential. Anyone who opposes the is labelled “envious” and “socialist”. In the American cognitive map, almost nothing is worse than being called a socialist or communist, hence these labels are frequently applied by political mischief-makers.

The “Free” Market Free-market capitalism is supposedly all about trading in open markets. Yet, by 2008, many “free-market” financial products had become so complex that they could not be traded in any conventional way at all since no one knew how to value them in straightforward terms. Instead of being valued

in terms of the price traders were willing to assign to them, these products had to be valued according to extremely baffling mathematical models and then traded on that basis. Such valuations were only as good as the models, but the workings and assumptions of these models were wholly opaque to almost everyone, including those who devised them in the first place (much as the quantum mechanical wavefunction is baffling to scientists, even though they rely on it). So, the financial system became “valued” according to incomprehensible models that no one understood. Is that sane? Guess what – nothing has changed! We’re still at the mercy of these financial instruments that no one can meaningfully grasp. It’s more or less true to say that the world economy has an entirely fictional value since no one anywhere can validate any valuations produced by mathematical models that are based on the absurd assumptions of economics (the “dismal science”, which is no science at all). The free-market is no such thing. It’s way beyond any person’s ability to understand. No ordinary people can participate in the game. In essence, a group of middlemen – the free-market’s priest caste – have appeared, and all market participants have to take their word for it that they know what they are talking about. However, if you were ever to meet these people, you wouldn’t accept that their word that the Pope is a Catholic. That’s how unbelievable, immoral and downright dishonest they are. Like all capitalists, they will say and do anything to make a profit. If they need to screw over the whole world to enrich themselves, so be it. The free-market, like everything else, has become all about the unspoken subtext, the unseen workings and assumptions of the market and its participants. For the free-market to be valid, it should involve no subtext at all. Everything should be visible, comprehensible text. Everything should be easy to value by the man in the street, just as if he were at a fruit market in his high street. As soon as a professional priesthood appears, with its own arcane practices and jargon, you know trouble is sure to follow. Free-market capitalism is now a kind of religious cult that worships Mammon and the profit principle and regards “evil” as not making a fast buck. All participants in the market are geared up for only one thing – making money no matter what.

And all of them engage in a “complicitous silence”. They all practise omerta – just like the Mafia. No one can regulate this system. No one can control it. That makes it unacceptable. It’s like a nuclear reactor without any control rods, i.e. it’s a catastrophe waiting to happen, and it has already happened several times, most especially in the Wall Street Crash of 1929 and the financial meltdown of 2008. We have to root out “social silence”, “complicitous silence”, and subtext. Everything must be visible, transparent, comprehensible, with its appropriate control rods. The global economy should be treated exactly as if it were a nuclear reactor, and should have the same level of supervision, regulation, safety standards and controls. Our livelihoods depend on it.

Atlas Shrugged Bafflingly, many libertarians regarded the 2008 financial crash – caused by unrestrained, unregulated free-market capitalism (exactly the system demanded by Ayn Rand in Atlas Shrugged) – as “Atlas Shrugged happening in real life.” Presumably, what they meant by this was that, in order to save the economy, the government was forced to rely on socialist bailouts of the financial system. In fact, what happened was the precise inverse of Ayn Rand’s mad book. In that book, socialist “moochers and looters” try to steal the profits of the “wondrous” entrepreneurial capitalists. In 2008, it was the “moochers and looters” who were forced to pay up to keep the reckless, irresponsible capitalists in business. The socialists saved the capitalists’ bacon – and got no thanks or reward for it whatsoever! That’s anarcho-capitalist libertarianism for you!

***** Remarkably, even though 2008 formally refuted all of Ayn Rand’s doctrines, her supporters viewed the same facts as a triumphant vindication! It just shows how powerful cognitive dissonance is.

The Old Formula The elite once said, “From those to whom much is given, much is expected.” Now they say, “From those to whom much is given, nothing is expected – except to be get even more.” The elite like to see themselves as noble. In fact, they are utterly selfserving and care nothing for anyone else.

***** From those who take much, you cannot expect much back. This is the grubby reality, the truth of the matter. Why should “much” be given to the few? To be more precise, why do the few want so much? So that they can spend it on themselves and indulge their every whim, and revel in the feeling of power? What’s noble about that? It’s time to take much from those who have much – 100% inheritance tax!

The Psychology of Control Imagine you want people to go along with your plans, to never defy you or challenge you. How would you achieve it? People securely in prison can pose no threat to those outside, so what you do is construct a prison – a psychological prison – from which those inside can never threaten your power. Let’s look at some of the things, a psychologist of mass control might come up with. No.1: How about “Turn the other cheek”. So, if I’m relentlessly hurting you, stealing from you, and abusing you then you don’t fight back. You simply turn the other cheek and let me keep doing it. Cui bono? No.2: How about “Wait for the kingdom of heaven to enjoy the rewards of your struggle.” In other words, don’t enjoy the rewards here and now, on this earth during this life of yours. Keep rendering unto Caesar what is Caesar’s, i.e. let the rich keep taking from you. All the while you have your eyes pointed at some future state (heaven) rather than the state of things right now. Cui bono?

No.3: How about the American dream? If you work hard, you will get your rewards. If you’re not getting rewards then ipso facto you’re not working hard enough. So, the tens of millions of Americans who work incredibly hard but come home with scarcely a cent in their pocket are at fault, whereas the investment bankers who walk off into the sunset with tens of millions of dollars obviously fully deserve it for all their “hard work”. (Hasn’t anyone noticed the economic meltdown? Who caused it? Who’s paying for it? – Well, you are.) Cui bono? Do you see what you’re up against? Who needs concentration camps when people will believe whatever self-serving line you sell them – the one that maximises your wealth and power. Welcome to the Old World Order.

The Old World Order’s Favourite Slogan? “There’s a sucker born every minute” – P.T. Barnum

Distraction We live in a world where we can be permanently distracted if we want to be. We are surrounded by endless opportunities for short-term pleasure. The only people who can succeed are those capable of resisting the pleasure of the moment. Why doesn’t the West rise up in righteous revolt against the elite? Because the people are too busy being distracted and pursuing instant gratification – exactly as the elite intended. Revolutionaries are either desperate people or people of principle. They are never comfortably off consumers, last men and Ignavi, with their eye permanently turned to their petty comforts and joys. Capitalism fights revolution by corrupting all would-be revolutionaries, by ensuring that they’re always too distracted to get off their asses and actually do anything significant with their lives. The capitalist elite are the ones who do important things. Everyone else just consumes and distracts themselves until they die.

Professional Liars Politicians are professional liars. They refuse to answer straight questions, and they would lose their jobs if they did. Along with lawyers and

advertisers, they are the modern successors of the sophists – people who will do anything to be rich, influential and in the limelight, using their rhetorical skills to manipulate, deceive and exploit. Why would any honest, decent, moral person want to be a politician? It’s one of those jobs that no one of integrity would ever take. So, what’s the point of politicians? It’s time to get rid of the whole rotten lot of them. Political parties should be outlawed. Anyone in a political role should be an independent, elected for their skill and merit in a particular field, not for joining a political party in order to wallow in bullshit. Politicians are not people of honour. There is no honour amongst thieves and liars.

The Dictator Manifesto All dictators have always said, “Do what I want and things will go well for you. Oppose what I want and things will go very badly for you.” However, given that dictators were mortal, this simply didn’t have enough “oomph”. So, they changed the message to, “Do what God wants or he will send you to the most terrible place of suffering conceivable. If you obey him, he will reward you with paradise itself. And, by the way, I am God’s anointed, so you must do exactly as I say and never oppose me – or you will incur the infinite wrath of God.” They ensured that they were anointed and crowned by high priests, popes and prophets to confer religious legitimacy on them. Political, military and economic power have always gone hand in hand with religious approval, endorsement and validation. God is often depicted as a loving but just father. Imagine a father saying to his children: obey me without question or I will destroy your body and torment and torture your soul in hell forever. If that’s not the worst parent conceivable, what is? How could the Devil be any worse? So, God = Devil.

The Cost of Being a Christian Luke 14:33 “So you cannot become my disciple without giving up everything you own.” There are over two billion Christians in the world. How many of them have given up everything they own? With the exception of a few monks, none at

all! There are maybe only a few thousand genuine Christians in the world, and all the rest are hypocrites. 100% inheritance tax would not cause a single concern for any authentic Christian, for the simple fact that no Christian should own anything anyway. Christians aren’t Christians. They are greedy capitalists obsessed with possessions, ownership, privilege and inheritance. The sooner these fake, phoney Christians are eradicated from the world, the better. The State should introduce a legal definition of “Christian” based on Luke 14:33 and anyone who does not live in accordance with it will be deemed non-Christian – which will remove 99.999% of Christians from the world’s religious roll call.

***** “Hello beloved, According to most Christians today, there is no cost to following Jesus. Oh, they might agree with you that there is one, but after looking at their fruit, it’s quite easy to see that there is very little that they have given up to follow Christ. In fact, there is very little that even distinguishes them as Christians. That is, other than their What Would Jesus Do bumper stickers and contemporary ‘Christian’ music, most of which they have illegally downloaded off of the internet. (It’s embarrassing that the divorce rate, and the number of abortions, doesn’t go down when polling the church.) So, despite the saltless, costless, counterfeit Christianity we see around us, Scripture is very clear that there is a cost. That cost is called repentance. Often times, we look at repentance as a turning from sin, which it is. But, a frequently overlooked truth about repentance is that we must turn from, not only things that are bad, but oftentimes we must give up things that aren’t bad. That is, they aren’t bad in and of themselves, yet they are still creating a wall between you and the call that God has on your life. As we look at the Scriptures, we will see that Jesus clearly explains that there is a cost to follow Him. The question is ‘Are we willing to pay it.’” – Adam Tennant (http://ifmypeople.wordpress.com/2008/02/21/you-cannot-be-my-disciple/)

Adam Tennant then reveals that he has a beautiful wife and daughter. Sorry, Adam, but none of Christ’s disciples were married and none had children ... you have to give up everything (everything precious to you and that ties you to the world) to be a Christian. You haven’t! You’re not a Christian. You

refused to pay the price. The price is as high as it can be. That’s the cost of admission to paradise, and most people aren’t willing to pay. Adam T will never be allowed to enter the Kingdom.

***** “If anyone comes to me and does not hate his father and mother, his wife and children, his brothers and sisters — yes, even his own life — he cannot be my disciple. And anyone who does not carry his cross and follow me cannot be my disciple.” – Luke 14:26-27 “I should point out, here, that Jesus is not calling us to hate our families. He is simply saying that we must love Christ more than we love our families. That we cannot allow our love for our families to get in the way of serving Christ.” – Adam Tennant But you’re married with a child, Adam! You’re a typical Christian hypocrite and false prophet.

Sin City Abrahamists often refer to sin as a disease, yet Abrahamism itself is the uttermost sin and disease. The final eradication of Abrahamism should be pursued with the same vigour as the elimination of AIDS. Nothing could be better for the health of humanity than the removal of Abrahamism. It has nothing good to offer. It wreaks appalling mental damage wherever it appears. On the one hand, children are subjected to genital mutilation, and, on the other, “infidels” are persecuted (implicitly, and frequently explicitly).

The Sin Delusion There’s simply no such thing as sin. To sin is to offend against the Abrahamic God but since the Abrahamic God either doesn’t exist or is the Devil then sin is rendered meaningless in the first case and absurd in the second. Indeed, it would be mandatory to sin as much as possible if, to do so, was to offend the Devil-God. Nothing has been more offensive to the Abrahamic God than the exercise of reason. Therefore, reason itself is the essence of sin according to

the Abrahamists. Not for nothing did Martin Luther – the first Protestant – declare that reason is the “Devil’s whore”. Have you never wondered why it is that you always hear Abrahamists banging on about sin, but never condemning irrationalism?! A “sinless” fool (irrationalist) is the perfect Abrahamist. In Illuminism, irrationality is sin (if we are to indulge such a concept) and the Abrahamists are irredeemably sinful. Isn’t it time these sinful people were driven to hell where they belong? What is hell? It’s the place where reason does not exist. No rational people inhabit hell, only the legions of the enemies of reason.

The Promised Land The Abrahamic God forbade his great prophet Moses entry to the Promised Land. The Abrahamic God will not stand in our way, and will forbid us nothing. We will create paradise on earth – whether he likes it or not. Like Moses, humanity stands on a lonely summit in sight of the promised land, but unable to enter. It will do so only when it embraces Illuminism.

The Ultimate Fashion Police Caligula ordered the beheading of a man whose clothes he didn’t like. Fashion’s a cut-throat business! Because he was so lethal to them and frequently humiliated them, Caligula was hated by the Roman aristocracy. By the same token, he was loved by the Roman mob. Since they were rarely his target, they didn’t see him as a madman, and they loved the way he terrorised the snobby elite.

Catholicism and Protestantism Catholicism and Protestantism go to the heart of the human condition. Everyone on earth, whether they know it or not, is instinctively either a Catholic or Protestant. Catholicism says that the Church is the gateway to salvation. Protestantism claims, on the contrary, that the individual has a direct relationship with God and has no need of any intermediate Church. If we convert Catholicism and Protestantism into political positions, Catholicism stands for the “Big State” which asserts that only it can deliver civilisation,

while Protestantism stands for anarchism, libertarianism, free-market capitalism and the total rejection of the State. Historically, America was a fanatically anti-Catholic nation and it’s therefore no surprise to find Protestant America as the fortress of the cult of the individual, of hatred of the State and government, of worship of markets and anarcho-capitalist libertarianism, of absolute reverence for the interests of the family over those of the State. Protestant nations are always characterised by “atomisation” – by individuals and families – and contempt for society, State and government. The underlying notion is the one that defines Protestantism, namely, that the individual knows best, has a personal hotline to God and no one has any right to interfere with the individual and his beliefs. Protestantism revolves around negative liberty – the doctrine that the State (the “Catholic Church”) should butt out. The expertise of the Pope and his cardinals, of the great pagan and Scholastic philosophers whose work underpinned Catholic doctrine and theology, was dismissed by Protestantism. Anyone who could pick up a Bible was deemed as well qualified as the Pope, Plato or Aristotle. The Protestant is the person who imagines himself in need of no others, who acknowledges no wiser and learned person than himself, who regards himself as the supreme expert, blessed by God. All of the following are “Protestants”: fanatical conspiracy theorists, followers of Ayn Rand, anarcho-capitalist libertarians, free-market capitalists, elite, dynastic families, those who say that selfishness is virtuous, that greed is good, that a person is justified by his faith alone. No one would argue that the Catholic Church has been any kind of success story but it nevertheless promotes the concept of universality, community, and society – all held together by the Church (the “City of God”), working to bring all Catholics to paradise. The Church is a meritocracy. Any good, smart member of the Catholic clergy can take the top job. He doesn’t have to be rich, privileged or well connected. Catholics accept the Pope as the best Catholic. No Protestant accepts anyone as a better Protestant than himself. Catholics respect expertise and merit; Protestants don’t. Protestants admire money, and worldly success attained by individuals and families. They intensely dislike State institutions.

Catholicism is about positive liberty. In political terms, it’s about how the State can perfect society. Protestantism, on the contrary, is about negative liberty – how the State should never interfere with the individual. All clever, altruistic people are “Catholics” in the sense that they grasp that the best way forward is via a meritocratic State of experts that serves the General Will and promotes the good of all. All selfish, greedy people are “Protestants” in the sense that they think that the best way forward is through every individual serving his maximum self-interest. The “market” is the perfect instrument of Protestantism because it can dispense with the State and government entirely and have everything run by individuals, families and corporations. In such a Protestant world, who is looking out for your interests? It’s you against everyone else. Everyone is out for himself or his family. There’s no community and no solidarity. It’s a cut-throat world of vicious, destructive competition: a zero-sum game. Every dollar by which the rich get richer is a dollar by which the poor get poorer. A society run according to the dictates of the market is a society with no aims at all other than the maximisation of profits for those controlling the market. There is no mission to create a better world for all, to optimize the abilities of everyone, to create a world of equal opportunities and fulfilment for all. When Margaret Thatcher said, “There is no such a society. There are individual men and women and there are families”, she was encapsulating the entire Protestant worldview. There is no common vision, no concept of community. It’s all about atomisation. So, what are you? – Catholic or Protestant? Is the Meritocratic State the best way forward, with the State doing everything it can to build a perfect society? Or are the individual, the family and the market the best way forward? Should the State massively intervene in the lives of its citizens to ensure their optimization (positive liberty), or ignore them entirely (negative liberty) and allow markets to run the world? A market has literally zero interest in your welfare. A market is not an intelligence with any purpose or vision. A market is just a means of allowing a small number of capitalists to become very rich and run the world in their own interests. The vast majority of people have zero say in how markets function, and no say over who runs them and why. Why do people feel more and more powerless and alienated from politics? Because politics is irrelevant in a world controlled by markets. The

modern world is ruled by big corporations and dynastic elite families (the Old World Order). It’s not ruled by elected governments. It does not serve the people or General Will. Instead, it serves the rich. It is Protestant, not Catholic (if the purpose of the Catholic Church is to save all Catholics and not just the “elect”, while the function of Protestantism is to separate the saved from the damned and enrich the former and impoverish the latter). The key difference between “Catholics” and “Protestants” is their attitude towards 100% inheritance tax. This tax wipes out the wealth of individuals and families on death. This ensures that individuals and families cannot perpetually rule the world in their own interests. Any Catholic immediately understands the point and logic of this tax. Any Protestant instantly sees it as an evil “Catholic” assault on the individual and the family, and vows to resist it to the bitter end.

***** Protestants are those who protest against utopian, all-embracing institutions. The Star Trek vision of the future is the worst nightmare for Protestants. The Earth of Star Trek is ruled by a one-world meritocratic government: it’s a New World Order! Capitalism has been abolished. There are no wealthy, dynastic, privileged families. The super rich no longer exist. Free-market economics has been overthrown. There’s no democracy. Faith has been rendered absurd. To the extent that religion exists at all, it’s a purely private matter. Nationalism has been swept aside. Faith, family and flag – the defining mantras of Protestantism – have been eradicated. Star Trek depicts a planned, smart, communitarian, meritocratic world devoted to personal fulfilment and optimization, with the State (the oneworld government) – not the markets or the rich – ruling the world. The State does so in the name of the General Will and the good of the Commonwealth. Selfish individuals harping on about their faith in God and markets have no place in this future. In the Star Trek future, there are no followers of Ayn Rand, no conspiracy theorists, no free-market capitalists, no dynastic elites. Abrahamism, to the extent that it exists at all, is now banned from the public sphere. It’s unimaginable that circumcision would be permitted in the Star Trek world or that people would go around in sectarian clothes to show their blind allegiance to one ancient sky God or another. Religion in Star Trek would be based on something very much like Illuminism – a hyperrationalist system embracing mathematics, science and

philosophy, with no place for faith and fanaticism, and no mention of heaven or hell. The Star Trek vision is none other than Plato’s Republic brought to life. Everyone intuitively knows that something like the Star Trek vision will be humanity’s future. In other words, the present is Protestant but the future will be Catholic. The Protestant mentality is that which must be overcome before we reach the Catholic utopia. Just to reiterate, we are not referring to the Catholic and Protestant religions, which are as mad and bad as each other. We are referring, on the one hand, to a universalist, communitarian, utopian vision that emphasizes the General Will and collective “salvation” through meritocratic institutions (this is the Catholic vision, and can be equated to the Big State sworn to positive liberty). This is opposed by the localist, individualist Protestant vision that emphasizes the particular will of private individuals (and sees the General Will as tyrannical and oppressive), and thinks that “salvation” is strictly between a man and his God (and has nothing to do with anyone else, especially not the State). The Protestant is fundamentally an anarchist who wants to replace government and the State with free markets that are guided by the “invisible hand” of God and that favour God’s elect (the rich) and penalise the damned (the poor). Wall Street is an archetypal Judaeo-Protestant creation. Instead of a Star Trek future, the Protestants dream of global capitalism – a worldwide Wall Street – where corporations run everything via markets and there are no governments at all. This is the supreme negative liberty vision where the State and government cannot interfere in your life because they don’t exist at all, and you exercise freedom and choice through the objects and services you purchase from corporations. This worldview is all about consumerism, selfishness, one-upmanship, narrow horizons and the total rejection of society and community. Anyone who cannot afford to buy goods and services is literally going to die, or be wholly reliant on the “charity” of the rich. That, more or less, is the world we live in now! America is the champion of the Protestant vision, and America’s far right, anarcho-capitalist libertarians actively seek the end of government and the State. Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged – which concludes with America being run by the super rich elite through unregulated, unshackled super capitalism – is the American right’s Bible. Virtually no one outside America

has anything but contempt for Ayn Rand, and yet, in America, it’s her ideology that tacitly rules the nation. The countries that come closest to the Catholic vision are, ironically, all identified with the Protestant religion (which demonstrates that we are talking about attitude here rather than religion). Norway, Finland, Sweden and Denmark – small, enlightened northern European nations with a pagan, Viking heritage – are probably the fairest countries in the world where your talents are likely to count for something. So, are you universalist (Catholic) or individualist (Protestant)? Are you meritocratic (Catholic) or democratic (Protestant)? Are you for positive liberty where you want the State to actively help you become the best you can be (Catholic) or are you for negative liberty where you want the State to have as little to do with your life as possible (Protestant)? Do you want rule by strong governments (Catholic) or do you want governments to be replaced by markets and corporations (Protestant)? Do you think there are people smarter than you who can help you to improve (Catholic) or do you think you are the smartest person in the world and need no help from anyone (Protestant)? Do you see great institutions as providing the best hope for creating paradise on Earth (Catholic), or do you belief paradise is waiting for you in the afterlife because of your personal contract and relationship with God (Protestant)? The Catholic and Protestant mentalities are almost 100% opposed, and the history of the world has brought first one and then the other to dominance through long, bitter periods of conflict. Hitherto, both the Catholic and Protestant visions have failed dismally. However, the Catholic vision can be rationally rectified, but the Protestant one cannot since it fundamentally rejects reason and universality and reveres irrational faith and the “invisible hand” of irrational markets. Catholicism is rationalist and Protestantism empiricist. If continental Europe is broadly Catholic in attitude, with Germany as its champion (despite the fact that Germany spawned Martin Luther), Britain and America are the champions of Protestantism. It’s noteworthy that America is a highly religious country while religion has practically died in Europe (with the exception of Islamic immigration). The more rational a nation is, the less overtly religious it is. Conspiracy theories represent a new kind of Protestant religion. As ever, the government, the State, the one-world government and New World Order

are the targets. The Vatican and the Jesuits are frequently cited as leading the great conspiracy. The Illuminati are routinely portrayed as Jews, Catholics or alien lizards – never as rich Protestants. There will have to be a final settlement between Catholicism and Protestantism before the world can move on. While the future is definitely Catholic, the Catholic religion itself will, ironically, play no part in this future. The Catholic religion is absurd. Its strength and justification lie in the attitudes and values it possesses when all of its deranged Abrahamic beliefs are stripped away. In fact, Catholicism without Abrahamism is simply the ancient Greek philosophy of Pythagoras, Plato, Aristotle and Plotinus. Protestantism without Abrahamism is nothing at all. Where Catholicism is a disguised version of ancient Greek paganism, Protestantism is a disguised version of Judaism. In the broader sense in which we are speaking, Judaism is quintessential Protestantism. The idea of God having a “Chosen People” (an elect, the “saved”) – with everyone else as the Unchosen People (the damned) is what defines Protestantism. Catholics want to save everyone, ideally; Protestants want only the elect to be saved, and everyone else to be punished and destroyed. Capitalism is all about the saved and the damned, the elect and the reprobates, the rich and the poor. The Protestant individualist believes in personal salvation (and fuck everyone else). The Catholic collectivist believes in universal salvation. Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged is about the triumph of the “good”, rich individuals (the elect) over the evil, poor collectivists (the damned – the moochers and looters). All people who worship the individual and family, and loathe the State in principle, not just in practice, are Protestants. All people who revere the community and the collective good, and see the State as the enabler of the General Will and Commonwealth, are Catholics. The Protestant is always individualist and anti-collectivist. The Catholic is always communitarian and opposed to the cult of the individual. The Protestant and the Catholic are the two predominant human “archetypes”. In Freudian terms, the Protestant promotes the Id, and the Catholic the Superego. Protestants are Dionysian and Catholics Apollonian. Protestants are extraverted and Catholics introverted. The Protestant is about “me” and the Catholic “we”.

***** Writer G K Chesterton observed that ordinary Catholics are attracted to equality and ordinary Protestants to inequality, and that Southern Europeans naturally have attitudes much more reflective of equality than Northern Europeans.

***** Religiously, the difference between Catholics and Protestants is that the latter think they have a direct relationship with God whereas the former think that an institution – the Church – stands between them and God. Esoteric societies are Catholic insofar as the initiates and adepts recognise that the secret society is the gateway to higher knowledge, and that it would be impossible for them to make the same progress on their own. A Protestant on the other hand thinks that by simply reading the Bible, he knows as much about Christianity as anyone who ever lived. Muslims are Protestants because they believe that all they have to do to have a direct relationship with God is read and obey the Koran. Jews are also Protestants in this sense because they believe that all they have to do to be favoured by their God is to read the Torah and obey the hundreds of Jewish commandments. Science is Catholic because a vast amount of institutional and highly specialised knowledge is essential to the success of anyone who wishes to become a scientist. No one can read a single book and proclaim himself an “expert”, as Protestants, Muslims and Jews do when they read their “holy” texts. Politically and economically, “Catholics” look to legitimate authorities to rationally and justly rule in the interests of all of the people. “Protestants” look to the “invisible hand” of the market to decide what happens, and see no need at all for any “authorities” or experts or regulation or government. Philosophically, “Catholics” are rationalists while “Protestants” are empiricists. Rationalists recognise that some people are smarter than others, more rational, hence why a meritocratic hierarchy is justified and appropriate. Empiricists believe that one person’s experiences are as valid as another’s and there’s no need or justification for any hierarchy – except in one particular context, which we shall come to shortly. This attitude leads to a general contempt for expertise, for the idea that some people know better than others and are more qualified. A Protestant is always likely to

say, “Your opinions are no more valid than mine.” If you take this notion to its logical conclusion, education is pointless, qualifications are valueless and all people have the same IQ. There are no geniuses and no one knows better than anyone else. This leads inexorably to the idea of democracy: one man, one vote. In fact, it leads to the idea of the lottery. Since all people are equal and all opinions are equal then, to be as fair as possible, you might as well appoint everyone to their jobs by lottery. However, there’s a radical difference between Athenian democracy and modern capitalist democracy. For Athenians, democracy was the antidote to rule by the rich whereas, in modern democracies, the rich are firmly in charge. In ancient Athens, all citizens were expected to be extremely active and committed to the State (and “private” citizens were regarded as contemptible idiots), whereas, in modern democracies, citizens are mostly passive politically, and deeply suspicious and even contemptuous of the State. In ancient Athens, citizens revered their city-state and the gods of their city-state above all else – above their families and themselves. They were all prepared to fight and die for Athens. In modern democracies, citizens care much more about themselves and their families, about their private religious beliefs, about their private interests, and are often deeply antagonistic towards the State. Many would even be prepared to take up arms against the State, as we see in America. To the ancient Athenians, this would make them absolute traitors, meriting the death penalty. So, even here, we find a Catholic/Protestant dichotomy. Ancient Athenian democrats were “Catholics” and modern democrats are “Protestants”. As mentioned above, there is one arena in which Protestants are fanatical hierarchists. That arena is the financial one. Protestants have more or less a religious belief that the empirical criterion of how much money you have is a direct measure of your ability, merit, goodness, virtue, morality and superiority. Protestants would never accept hierarchical rule by Popes or the Platonic intelligentsia, but they will always readily accept hierarchical rule by the rich. The Protestant world is the rich man’s world and free-market capitalism is its natural economic expression. The Protestants demand minimal regulation of capitalism so that the rich can become as rich as possible. To a Protestant, 100% inheritance tax is like a stake through a vampire’s heart. It destroys everything Protestants believe about the “natural order” of things.

Protestantism says that money is everything. Profit is all that counts. Everyone is a commodity being bought and sold in the market. Protestantism fundamentally objectifies, degrades and dehumanises people. “Catholicism” always entails a love or respect for the State. “Protestantism” is always suspicious of State power and seeks to protest against it and weaken it. Catholicism always reflects the collective and the General Will while Protestantism always reflects the individual and the particular will. All of the following are “Catholic”: Pythagoreanism Athenian Democracy Spartan Militarism Plato’s Republic Hinduism The Roman Empire The Catholic Church The Holy Roman Empire The French Revolution Marxism Fascism Nazism Statism Science Education Meritocracy All of the following are Protestant: Judaism Buddhism

Islam Anarchism Libertarianism Individualism Liberalism The Protestant Religion Christian Fundamentalism Evangelical Christianity Free-market Capitalism Capitalist Democracy Hippie Culture New Age Thinking Political Correctness Conspiracy Theories Consumerism Deregulation Home Schooling Parental Authority Anti-Statism

The American Civil War In the American Civil War, the North was “Catholic” and the South “Protestant”. The North was determined to put an end to the appalling evil of slavery and was prepared to use force to impose its will. It refused to compromise with the rich Southern plantation owners. The South saw the North as an interfering “bully” that had no right to dictate to the rich men of the South. To the Southerners, slavery was mandated by God, was Biblically justified, was perfectly right and natural,

and helped to make the rich rich and keep them rich. Government had no right to stick its nose into commerce and people’s religious beliefs. The North represented the positive liberty “big State” and the South the negative liberty “small State”. In present-day America, the Southern vision has more or less won. African Americans are still treated disgracefully, America is still racist to the core, big government is despised, the State is viewed with extreme suspicion and distrust, business and commerce are allowed to do what they like without any government interference. Government, unlike in Abraham Lincoln’s day, is unable and unwilling to face down the rich and use force. If it did, there would be another Civil War. The 9/11 conspiracy theory is a libertarian device to present the government as a lethal threat to the people. America citizens are the most heavily armed in the world and would be able to give the American army a good fight. American history from the Mayflower onwards was largely based on anarchist, non-conformist, dissenter, and libertarian religious fanatics seeking to remove themselves from “unGodly” governments and States, and their attitudes are still ingrained in the American mindset. Europe has a “Catholic” mindset while America is Protestant. The Europe Union is “Catholic” and is despised by the American right wing and seen as socialist (socialism is, of course, also “Catholic” in the broad context we are invoking). Although Abraham Lincoln was a Republican and “Catholic”, the modern Republican Party is wholly Protestant and would never sanction any of Lincoln’s “big government” policies. The Republican’s current power base is in the Confederate South and the Christian Fundamentalist Midwest. It’s a fanatically “Protestant” political movement. It despised JFK (as a Catholic in both the religious and political sense) and similarly despises Obama (frequently denounced as a Communist). The libertarians, free-market capitalists, Tea Party, Republican Party, Christian Fundamentalists, conspiracy theorists and the super rich comprise an unholy Protestant alliance. They are utterly opposed to the big State, to interventionist Government, to public spending, and to positive liberty. They want little or no State. The Catholic (universalist and communitarian) and Protestant (particular and individualist) worldviews have been clashing throughout history. There

really needs to be a complete separation of the Catholic-minded and the Protestant-minded since it’s impossible for them to agree on anything. All right wing “democratic” parties are Protestant and all left wing parties Catholic. In America, the Democrats are Catholics and the Republicans Protestants. The rich always belong to the Protestant faction. Jews usually belong to the Protestant faction. Conspiracy theorists are always Protestants. Anarchists and libertarians are Protestants.

***** In the American Civil War, large numbers of Irish Catholics fought for the Union while the vast majority of Confederates were Protestants. It was of course the South that gave birth to the ultra-Protestant Ku Klux Klan. America has always been run by WASPs – White Anglo-Saxon Protestants. When it comes to any issue at all, you can be sure there will always be rival Catholic and Protestant perspectives. Underneath all the rhetoric and sophistry, it always comes down to whether you are on the side of community, government and the State (Catholicism) or the individual, family and markets (Protestantism). The Catholic family is highly communitarian while the Protestant family is atomistic and cut-throat, committed to a game theory view of the world where all are families are in Darwinian competition with each other. Well, are you a Catholic (universalist) or a Protestant (libertarian)?

The Smell The current Queen of England complained that she smells fresh paint wherever she goes. Of course, that’s because she never sees anything as it actually is. A “show” is always put on for her. Everything is spruced up, cleaned up, painted and made pristine for her inspection. So, this is a person who never once confronts the real world. She never has real conversations with real people. Like the places she visits, which are artificially clean and tidy, all the people she meets are artificially clean and tidy. They’re all on their best behaviour, faking it. The queen lives in an entirely fake world, a persona world, a shallow, superficial world of appearances and no substance. Reality never intrudes. Only a lunatic would want her life and only a nation of torturers and maniacs would inflict that fate on anyone. Monarchy, everywhere, must be abolished. Stop painting!

***** When Catherine the Great of Russia went on a tour of her country, her lover – Potemkin – ensured that she visited perfect communities that he had prepared in advance. These are now known as “Potemkin villages.” The Queen of England, and indeed all dignitaries in every country of the world, do nothing but visit Potemkin villages and Potemkin people. Reality is forever hidden from them.

The Triumph of the Cockroaches “If all the insects were to disappear from the earth, within 50 years all life on earth would end. If all human beings disappeared from the earth, within 50 years all forms of life would flourish.” – Jonas Salk Flourish? Life without consciousness is not worthy of the name “life”. Nietzsche said that the French Revolution was justified only insofar as it produced a world-historic figure in Napoleon. Life on earth is justified only insofar as it generates consciousness. If it fails, there might as well be no life on earth at all. Rocks have as much meaning as non-conscious life that has no potential to generate consciousness. Salk implies that humanity is the enemy of life. In fact, humanity is the culmination of life on this planet, and the highest humans – the Nietzschean Supermen – are the culmination of that culmination. The world’s purpose is to produce beings like Nietzsche, not to generate countless rats, ants and cockroaches. Salk betrays a fundamental hatred of humanity. He celebrates mere quantity of life over quality. Life is not about existence per se, but optimisation. About, as Nietzsche put it, Will to Power. Humanity encapsulates the true life and glory of Gaia. Cockroaches do not. People who think that non-conscious animals have equal rights and equal status to conscious animals are insane. They are absolute enemies of the process of “becoming God”, which is all about climbing the great ladder of being to the very top. Life is not about maximising its quantity but its quality. You haven’t understood anything if you haven’t understood that.

Elections

Many nations trumpet the benefits of elections, but, given their rhetoric that democratic elections are the key to success and freedom, how seriously do they pursue the election paradigm? Who elected the monarch in a “democratic” nation such as the UK? Well, no one. It seems that the powers-that-be in the UK believe that the people should have no right to elect their Head of State and should have that person imposed on them by an anti-meritocratic, anti-democratic hereditary principle. Who elected the CEOs that run the banks that decide the direction of the economy? No one. Who elected the markets that dominate and define the capitalist world? No one. Who elected the super rich who wield so much power and influence in our world? No one. Who elected the lobbyists who fanatically promote the interests of the super rich? No one. Who elected the media moguls who control the airwaves? No one. Who elected Hollywood that does so much to influence impressionable minds? No one. Who elected the sports stars, sports teams and sports managers that capture the passion of so many people? No one. Who elected the bosses of all corporations? No one. Who elected the managers of all corporations? No one. So, in every single way that counts, “democracy” isn’t involved at all. Elections are used for nothing in our day-to-day lives. Plainly, then, those who brag about the value of democratic elections are liars and hypocrites because they can’t wait to get shot of democratic elections in every arena of life that matters. Political elections change nothing because everything important has already been decided by unelected markets, banks, corporations, entrepreneurs, media barons, the super rich, cabals, privileged elites, dynastic families, and so on. Even the Catholic Pope has more elective credibility than all of these others. At least he is elected by the College of Cardinals. Democratic elections are the second greatest fraud ever perpetrated against the human race, surpassed only by the Abrahamic lies peddled by Moses, Jesus Christ and Mohammed.

Judge the powerful by their actions, not their rhetoric; by their deeds, not their words. If democracy is so desirable and wonderful, why aren’t markets, CEOs, managers, bankers, entrepreneurs, monarchs, religious leaders, media moguls, and so on, democratically elected? If they’re not, those in charge don’t rate democracy at all but are advocates of something utterly different. To what is that those who rule us actually subscribe? It’s authoritarian, dictatorial plutocracy – rule by the entrenched, rich elites. That’s the principle by which the world is truly run. Democracy is just a stage show for the marks and suckers, the gullible sheeple that have been so dumbed down that they believe every lie the rich sell them. If you support democracy, demand democracy in every arena of life. If you don’t want democracy operating throughout society then you plainly aren’t a democrat. As for us, we’re not democrats, we’re meritocrats. We advocate elections, but only in a limited sense. Everyone can get to vote on anything for which they are suitably qualified, and get no votes otherwise. We want this model to operate everywhere without exception. Everyone in any important post should be elected by those qualified to judge their merit. So, for example, every citizen in the country can take a basic banking exam and, if they pass, then they can vote on who should be running the nation’s banks because they have proved that they have an informed opinion. If they fail the banking exam, or have no interest in it, then they don’t get a banking vote because it would be insane to allow the ignorant to vote on things they don’t understand and can’t be bothered to understand. There will be no more unelected officials taking decisions behind closed doors. Everyone will have an elective constituency to which they must demonstrate their merit ... or be replaced (without compensation). This is the only sane, rational way to ensure we get the most talented people in the most important positions, and to allow them to be kicked out if they fail to do a good job. We will no longer be subject to the dictatorship of the unelected – of the rich, privileged, anti-meritocratic elites – which is what capitalist “democracy” has given us. It’s time to scrap phoney democracy and replace it with authentic meritocracy.

Faith and Works

“You see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith only.” – James (James 2:24). “We conclude that a man is justified by faith apart from the deeds of the law.” – Paul (Romans 3:28). Here we have a classic difference between the Catholic and Protestant religions. Catholics believe that faith and “works” (good deeds towards others) go together. Protestants assert than man is justified by faith alone and that good deeds are meaningless. The Catholic is directed towards helping others while the Protestant is preoccupied with himself. The Catholic is communitarian while the Protestant is individualist. Let’s be clear: faith is of no value to anyone bar the person himself who holds that faith. It’s a selfish notion. Good deeds, on the other hand, reflect a practical morality that actively helps others. Whom would you rather have as your neighbour? – a Protestant justified by his faith who does no good deeds, or a Catholic not justified by his faith who does good deeds?

Immanentize the Eschaton “In political theory and theology, to immanentize the eschaton means trying to bring about the eschaton (the final, heaven-like stage of history) in the immanent world. It has been used by conservative critics as a pejorative reference to certain utopian projects, such as socialism, communism, and transhumanism. In all these contexts it means ‘trying to make that which belongs to the afterlife happen here and now (on Earth)’ or ‘trying to create heaven here on Earth.’ ... According to Jonah Goldberg, writing in National Review Online, modern usage of the phrase started with Eric Voegelin in The New Science of Politics in 1952. Political commentator William F. Buckley was the most notable of many US conservative readers of Voegelin’s work, and largely as a result of his popularising the phrase, it became a political slogan of Young Americans for Freedom during the 1950s and 1960s. [MH: Actually, they wore a badge saying, ‘Don’t Immanentize the Eschaton.’] “Voegelin identified a number of similarities between ancient Gnosticism and the beliefs held by a number of modernist political theories, particularly Communism and Nazism. He identified the root of the Gnostic

impulse as social alienation, that is, a sense of disconnection from society and a belief that this lack of concord with society is the result of the inherent disorder, or even evil, of the world. He described this alienation as having two effects: “The belief that the disorder of the world can be transcended by extraordinary insight, learning, or knowledge, called a Gnostic Speculation by Voegelin (the Gnostics themselves referred to this as gnosis). “The desire to implement a policy to actualize the speculation, or as Voegelin said, to Immanentize the Eschaton, to create a sort of heaven on earth within history.” – Wikipedia “Catholics” (or Gnostics in Voegelin’s terminology) are all about “Immanentizing the Eschaton” – building heaven on earth. The Hegelian dialectic concerns precisely this. It’s time for a new badge for the left: “Immanentize the Eschaton!” The Illuminati Order is all about Immanentizing the Eschaton – which is why it’s so hated by conspiracy theorists, Protestants, Randroids, anarchocapitalist libertarians, Jews, Muslims and free-market capitalists.

Catholic Catholic: from Latin catholicus (“universal”) from Greek katholikos, from kata “about” + holos “whole” (hence, “about the whole”, “concerning all”; “of interest to all”, “universal”).

Catholicon “Death is the cure of all diseases. There is no catholicon or universal remedy I know, but this, which though nauseous to queasy stomachs, yet to prepared appetites is nectar, and a pleasant potion of immortality.” – Religio Medici by Sir Thomas Browne Catholicon: a remedy for all ills, a universal remedy, a panacea. Catholics seek the Catholicon – the final cure for all the world’s ills. The primary disease is Protestantism, the gospel of the unashamed, selfish individualist who thinks he has a hot line to God and is one of the elect. The State cannot do its proper work when it is opposed from within by a fifth column that seeks to subvert it and defy it at every turn.

Anarcho-capitalist libertarianism and the gospel of Ayn Rand are the supreme expressions of the Protestant mentality. In terms of visions of the future, it’s Atlas Shrugged (Protestant individualism, privilege and freemarket capitalism) versus Star Trek (Catholic collectivism, meritocracy and an economy without the super rich). What’s it to be? What side are you on?

The False Meritocracy “The concept of success leads me to consider so-called meritocracies and their implications. We have been taught that meritocratic institutions and societies are fair. Putting aside the reality that no system, including our own, is really entirely meritocratic, meritocracies may be fairer and more efficient than some alternatives. But fair in an absolute sense? Think about it. A meritocracy is a system in which the people who are the luckiest in their health and genetic endowment; luckiest in terms of family support, encouragement, and, probably, income; luckiest in their educational and career opportunities; and luckiest in so many other ways difficult to enumerate – these are the folks who reap the largest rewards. The only way for even a putative meritocracy to hope to pass ethical muster, to be considered fair, is if those who are the luckiest in all of those respects also have the greatest responsibility to work hard, to contribute to the betterment of the world, and to share their luck with others. As the Gospel of Luke says (and I am sure my rabbi will forgive me for quoting the New Testament in a good cause): ‘From everyone to whom much has been given, much will be required; and from the one to whom much has been entrusted, even more will be demanded’ (Luke 12:48, New Revised Standard Version Bible).” – Ben Bernanke There are two wildly opposed understandings of meritocracy. One is right wing and based on negative liberty and the other is left wing and based on positive liberty. In the right wing version, children born into elite families are given the best of everything that money can buy. Above all, they are given the best education at the finest schools and colleges. Naturally, these children obtain extremely high qualifications and proceed to call themselves “the best”, the most meritorious. After all, they have the certificates to prove it. From the left wing perspective, this is not meritocracy at all but a blatant system of anti-meritocratic privilege. If you give a small elite

overwhelming resources and advantages, they will automatically beat everyone else, just as if you allow someone to start a 100m race five metres from the finishing line, he will certainly win even if the world record holder is waiting at the starting line. From the left wing perspective of meritocracy, you can judge who is most meritorious only from the perspective of everyone setting out from the same starting line. Otherwise, the concept is meaningless. A meritocracy can’t involve the system being rigged in any way. Plainly, the use of money to secure overwhelming advantage and to rig the system on behalf of the privileged is the exact opposite of meritocracy. It’s plain old plutocracy – rule by the rich, privileged elite, the dynastic Old World Order. As ever, to justify their wealth, power and status, the plutocratic elite attempt to commandeer concepts that have no relation to them. They say, “We are at the top because we are the best.” They never say, “We are at the top because we have rigged the system to ensure precisely that outcome.” A meritocracy is where everyone gets an even chance to go to Harvard or its equivalent, where everyone gets the finest education, healthcare, living environments, and so on. This requires enormous State intervention to free the people and allow them to be all they can be (positive liberty), and necessitates the total destruction of privileged dynastic elites (via 100% inheritance tax). The right wing “meritocrats” want 0% inheritance tax and the absolute right to rig the system however they please, with no State interference. Yet again, we have anarcho-capitalist libertarian plutocracy raising its head in which a Randian elite rule the world in perpetuity and the State and government are abolished, with everything being run by “free” markets (i.e. markets rigged by the rich to favour them at all times). Whenever you hear mention of “meritocracy”, make sure you understand whether it’s left or right wing meritocracy. Right wing “meritocracy” is simply old-fashioned privilege rebranded. It’s the actual opposite of meritocracy, and no authentic meritocrat could ever stomach it. Any meritocratic system that does not endorse the creation of genuine equal opportunities through 100% inheritance tax to remove privilege is not meritocratic at all. All true meritocrats agree on one thing – the meritocrat is someone who emerges from a fair competition between everyone, not one who wins a game that was rigged for him from the outset because he belonged to a

privileged elite that received enormously better treatment than everyone else, and weren’t in fact in competition with everyone else at all, but only amongst themselves. The rich elite always try to hijack the language of their enemies and use it to their own advantage to justify their own elitism and privilege. These are the least meritocratic people you could imagine. They would be nothing without their rich parents and spectacular inheritances.

Paradise “A Christian is a person who wants to give up great things in a real life, for mediocre things in an imaginary one. More importantly, they demand you do the same.” – Mark Twain We can have a paradise on this earth of ours, but only if we defeat all those who think that paradise comes only after death.

Power “If you want to test a man’s character, give him power.” – Abraham Lincoln Almost all of those who have wielded power in our world have shown exactly what character they have – the lowest possible. They have been purely out for themselves and their families. The most important issue facing the human race is how to get the best people into power and keep the worst out of power.

The Class System The American and British class systems are subtly different. The Americans have four classes: 1) The upper class – the privileged elite, the great dynastic families, the super rich, the celebrities, the political and business leaders, Wall Street, the alumni of Ivy League colleges. 2) The middle class – the ordinary mass of regular people, Main Street. 3) The lower class – “trailer trash”, those doing the most menial jobs, receiving welfare benefits and only just clinging on to the system.

4) The underclass – those who fallen out of the system entirely, beggars, vagrants, people living in cardboard cities and dependent on food banks and charity. In Britain, there are also four classes, but with key distinctions: 1) The upper class – royalty, aristocracy, lords and ladies, earls, dukes, barons, baronets, and so on. They are “old” money. 2) The middle class – which divides into “upper” middle class, “middle” middle class and “lower” middle class. The “upper” middle class are “new” money. In America, they would be designated as part of the upper class (although American “old” money would frown). The “middle” middle class are well-off professionals and middle managers. The lower middle class are junior and lower managers and people in good, solid, respectable jobs. 3) The working class – the bulk of the people, those working in humdrum offices, factories and shops doing dreary, low-paid jobs who can be easily replaced. Many are on welfare benefits. 4) The underclass – those who have fallen out of the system and are living on the streets. In Britain, what the Americans call the “middle class” is composed of the “lower” middle class and the working class. So, for the Americans, the great mass of people are directly below the upper class, hence can aspire to rise up to that level (the American Dream). In Britain, the great mass of people have to negotiate their way past the “middle” middle class and “upper” middle class to get to the top, and, in fact, they would never be accepted as part of the upper class because they lack the “royal” connections. In Britain, many of those whom Americans call the lower class would be designated simply as working class.

The “Horror” Class System Even horror creatures belong to a class system. Vampires, exemplified by Count Dracula, are usually depicted as rich, seductive, decadent aristocrats and patricians who prey on the beautiful maidens of the poor class. Egyptian Mummies, with their royal heritage, are also aristocratic.

Zombies are plebeians. They are the shuffling, shambling, consumerist masses with no direction in life. The Invasion of the Body Snatchers, involving the creation of conformist masses, inhabits similar territory. Werewolves are proletarians – the creatures of the underclass. They are just a full moon away from surrendering their humanity and becoming beasts. Dr Jekyll was a sophisticated patrician who effected a transition to the brutal proletarian Mr Hyde. The Invisible Man is a plebeian figure. Symbolically, he’s a downtrodden, unseen, unheard nobody. It’s not so much that he’s physically invisible as metaphorically invisible. The Texas Chainsaw Massacre involves proletarian monsters. The film “Deliverance” is about patricians descending into the world of the proles. Aliens represent the mysterious, frightening “other” – the deadly unknown, the monsters of the unconscious mind. They can belong to any class. Superheroes are the fantasy figures of the plebeians, those whom they would love to be, suddenly blessed with the great powers that they signally lack in their normal lives. Religions, gods, devils, angels and demons, saints and sinners, can also all be defined in class terms. If we say that rational, creative, autonomous Logos individuals are natural patricians and the irrational, uncreative, tradition- and other-directed Mythos masses are natural plebeians and proletarians then we can make the following observations: 1) The Abrahamic God is plebeian and even proletarian, i.e. only the vulgar, common, irrational masses are attracted to him. Egyptian, Canaanite, Greek, Roman, Celtic and Norse gods are patrician gods. In particular, gods such as Apollo, Dionysus and Janus are highly attractive to great thinkers (such as Nietzsche). 2) The Hindu caste system turns the traditional class system into a fixed religious structure ... one of the worst ideas ever conceived. This is tacitly reflected in the Western class system (and especially in the Protestant religion) where the rich are deemed holier than the poor. The rich are the elect (the saved), and the damned are the poor. Wealth is taken as a direct sign of divine favour.

In Nigeria, Protestant evangelical preachers espouse the “Prosperity Gospel” This claims that if you truly believe in Jesus Christ you will ipso facto become prosperous, i.e. Christianity will make you rich. Wealthy pastors in Nigeria have luxury cars with bumper stickers saying such things as, “God is great, life is sweet!” It just goes to show how close Christianity is to outright charlatanry, magic thinking and the fleecing of the gullible and credulous. It’s the greatest con job ever known. The sermons of the Prosperity Gospel mix Bible theology, finance, selfhelp, motivational speaking, snake oil selling, and so on. God knows what it has to do with religion. It’s capitalist Christianity where the profit principle is everything. If you fail to become rich, it’s your fault for not believing strongly enough. Poverty is a sure sign that you lack faith or have been actively damned.

Abrahamists in Disguise JRF: “This post is weak. Yet another well written mess. I want to reveal truths and not just turn my face to someone else’s system. If you want to understand most Abrahamic concepts correctly and not through the eyes of the corrupt and bastardized Church leaders, you first need an understanding of hermetic, astrological, alchemical and Kabbalistic systems. Then the allegories take on a whole new light. As for true Illuminati members, well they wouldn’t go public in such a manner and wouldn’t say such things about any system of faith simply because true Illuminati are illumined to understand all religions philosophies and sciences, which are branches to the same tree. As such, they would endeavour to make people of those systems aware of the truths in them or how they correlate with others. You can find connections in Abrahamic faiths to the systems I mentioned as well as a laundry list of others. The ancient Greeks had Zeus and his son Hermes, the Scandinavians had Odin and Thor, the Egyptians Osiris, Isis and Horus. Your post sounds intelligent to the less learned but to someone who studies these subjects as well as the esoteric significance it sounds biased and hateful. Makes me think you are a former Abrahamist with bad experiences. I don’t know your backgrounds but many of your views are misconceptions based on the political aspects and power struggles of the leaders of those systems. We are in the Aquarian age now. We left the golden calf of Taurus. We travelled the desert with Moses and the ram horn during Aires and we were fisherman of men’s souls during Pisces and now

we are suppose to be in the Apocalypse, which is Greek for revealing or the lifting of the veils. Let us not fall victim to the false Messiahs of all these organized messes. Let us reveal the reason these stories were rewritten in every culture faith and climate. Let us lift the veil to unite and realize all is one and one is all. We are all connected and simply separated by language.” This is the sort of pseudo-Abrahamic gibberish and babble we frequently encounter. Let’s be crystal clear: Abrahamism has zero truth content and the notion that all religions reflect some core truth is ridiculous. No rational person could find any commonality between Creationist religions based on Torture Gods and eternalist religions of reincarnation. This clown asserts that we should regard Abrahamism allegorically despite the fact that 99.9% of the people who subscribe to Abrahamism do not. Abrahamism can be whatever you want it to be if you treat it allegorically, as can any other story. You can fit it to any set of “facts” you want, hence it’s meaningless. These infantile, ignorant, self-styled “esotericists” are invariably Narcissistic bull-shitters and charlatans who think they have secret knowledge and a special, secret understanding of reality. They don’t. Reality is 100% mathematical and anyone who thinks that silly Mythos allegories can be mentioned in the same breath as substantive ontological mathematics is demented. JRF says, “We are all connected and simply separated by language.” Well, here’s a newsflash for you, buddy, you have no connection with us and we’re separated from you by an unbridgeable gulf of reason. You don’t speak the language of truth and you never will. You’re a Mythos person who rambles on as if Biblical stories had some element of truth. They contain no truth whatsoever. There is no ancient wisdom other than that linked to the development of mathematics. You have grasped nothing if you don’t see that humanity must abandon Mythos stories and allegories as portals to reality and truth and turn once and for all to eternal, analytic Logos truths.

Hate Speech DM: “‘The Bible must be relentlessly mocked and undermined.’ So what does combating hate with hate do for humanity? I’m not a Christian, believe me, but I expected better of Illumination than this.”

So, you think we should blow kisses to the Abrahamists while they’re burning us at the stake? Wise up. Grow up. Enter the real world for a change. No tolerant person can tolerate intolerance, and, if they do, then they themselves are intolerant. All good people must combat evil and hate evil. If they don’t, who’s going to win? Hippie pacifists can wring their hands elsewhere. There’s nothing wrong with hate if it’s directed against lies and evil. What’s the alternative? – that we should love lies and evil? You wonder why the world is fucked? It’s because of these irrational clowns who wallow in their childish fantasies of unconditional “love and light”.

Derision RG: “I am not a Christian, but only preachers/advocates of a weak religion will talk small of other religions.” Says who? On the contrary, only subscribers to weak religions do not denounce other religions. If you’re so sympathetic to other religions, why don’t you go right ahead and join them? The fact that you don’t shows that you yourself are tacitly finding fault with them. The fact that you don’t say so proves how cowardly, sneaky, deceitful, dishonest, irrational and hypocritical you are. So why should anyone listen to you? You either accept a religion or you reject it. You can’t do both.

The Name HN: “Oy vey Art; I tried reading the gobbledegook that you posted! I gave up after the statement that Jews worshipped an angry yada yada G__d. The premise I think is based on the statement, ‘You shall stand in fear of your lord your G_D.’ The word translated as fear is really to stand in awe. I constantly stand in awe of my G_D; the G_D of Israel!!! and all mankind.” What, are you so afraid of your “God” that you can’t even write GOD? What the fuck’s wrong with you, retard? The God of Israel isn’t the God of all mankind – by definition. The True God doesn’t have a Chosen People and couldn’t care less about Israel. Jews are Devil worshippers. That’s a fact. Their God isn’t just “angry”, he’s a psychopath.

Facebook Madness

Here’s a Facebook comment by someone called Raul Romero: “Uhhh wut.” Yup, that’s it! End of “contribution”. Facebook is a means by which stupid people can leave incomprehensible grunts for all to see. Wouldn’t there be an instant improvement in the quality of the world if all such grunters were culled like seals? What’s the point of people who feel compelled to post gibberish comments everywhere? Does it make them feel important? It would be valid for employers to blacklist all of these grunters as unemployable stoners, wasters, dopes and slackers.

The Great Danger Humanity has always had to fight against the ubiquitous “herd animal” – the ordinary human being, the Mass Man, the Last Man, the conformist.

Cicero versus Caesar Cicero was the politician (the “defender of laws”). Caesar was the dictator (“man of action”). History is full of conflicts between the politician and the dictator. If the dictator comes to power, the politician always dies. Following Caesar’s assassination, his henchman Mark Antony put Cicero put death.

The Calling For anyone interested in becoming involved with the Illuminati, the first step is to make something of yourself, to do something meaningful, to make a contribution to the world. Become meritorious. The Knights of the Round Table were renowned for their deeds, not their bluster.

What Do People Pay For? People are willing to pay for sex, drugs, alcohol, food, status, prestige, useful gadgets, entertainment devices, communication devices, access to big events, gigs, major sports occasions, big movies, anything big and popular where it counts against you if you don’t know about it or haven’t been there. They will pay for anything that ensures they keep up with the Joneses and, preferably, ahead of them. People are not willing to pay for anything that the Joneses are not interested in, and that won’t keep them beside or ahead of the Joneses, and

might in fact make them fall behind the Joneses. They won’t pay for anything abstract, demanding, hard, unpopular, difficult. They won’t pay for serious knowledge or information (unless to get a degree that will help their career or status). They will pay for Mythos but not Logos. In the end, people pay for “highs”, for self-indulgence, for instant gratification, for status, for popularity, for social utility. They will pay for pleasure and whatever the Joneses are paying for. They won’t pay for anything unpleasurable or anything that the Joneses snub. So, we live in a pleasure dome, a fun park, a Wonderland, in a world of trivia and junk, of big events and spectacles ... a world absolutely dumbed down, relentlessly targeting the lowest common denominator and given over to feelings, sensations and extraversion. Capitalism is a superb system for identifying what people will pay for because it’s entirely driven by the profit principle and not by quality, intelligence, rationality, sanity, manners, or morality. You don’t have a prayer if you’re a Logos person who tackles the hardest things in the world, the things the Joneses (the last men) would never go near.

Cats and Dogs Dogs are baby substitutes and cats are stroppy teenager substitutes. As baby substitutes, dogs are helpless and reliant on their masters, and show unconditional love. As stroppy teenager substitutes, cats are independent and do their own thing. They show conditional love. The more mentally mature you are, the more you prefer cats over dogs, and eventually you will prefer no pets at all. Most dog owners are feeling and sensing types. Most cat owners are sensing and thinking types. Most people without pets are thinking and intuitive types. Cat owners are more intelligent than dog owners, and people without pets are more intelligent than those with pets. Dogs are dependent creatures and cats are independent. Abrahamists are like dogs, and non-Abrahamists are more catlike. Dogs are as highly attached to their owners as babies are to their parents. Cats don’t have strong attachments to their owners, just as teenagers are breaking away from and rebelling against their parents.

Why Merit is Opposed “Arrogance on the part of the meritorious is even more offensive to us than the arrogance of those without merit: for merit itself is offensive.” – Nietzsche A true meritocracy leaves no one with any excuses. In a meritocracy, the best win, and if you don’t win it’s because you weren’t the best, and there are no excuses you can make. Most people are terrified of having their merit properly put on the line, and that’s why they prefer a society of privilege.

The Charity Delusion Only right wingers support charity. “Charity” is all about diminishing the power of the State and delegating tasks to the private sector. The right wing “charity” ethos reached its zenith in Dickensian London with the Work House, the Poor House and the Debtors’ Prison. The British State offered no welfare system at all in those days. Rich “philanthropists”, if they could be bothered, gave the poor a minimal subsistence existence. If anything is worthwhile, the State should fund it. If it’s not worthwhile, who cares about it? Either way, there’s no need for charity: the indulgent plaything of anti-Statists.

Invention and Capitalism Capitalists never invent anything. What they do is exploit the ideas of noncapitalists. People like Steve Jobs, Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg would never have been possible without geniuses such as Pascal, Leibniz, Babbage, Turing and many others who weren’t capitalists. It’s scandalous that the capitalist exploiters take all the glory, credit and profit for all the non-capitalist endeavours in science, mathematics, engineering and technology, without which there would be no capitalist “innovation”.

The Maniacs Nazi Germany is rightly regarded as a monstrous regime, and yet, with different people in charge – instead of thugs, psychopaths and fantasists – it might have been something wondrous. Germany could have become the

first advanced nation to overthrow Abrahamism, “democracy” and freemarket capitalism, to create a people rather than a population, to have a nation of the spirit rather than one of material objects, to be a Gnostic nation of ideals and knowledge, devoted to the pursuit of perfection and transcendence. People must think properly, even about horrors and abominations. Because of the extermination camps, it’s believed that Nazi Germany has nothing to teach the world, except in a strictly negative sense (a “warning from history”). Of course, the people most heavily promoting this analysis are the Abrahamists, democrats and free-market capitalists – exactly those who were despised by the Nazis. If there were a meritocratic National Socialist Germany, led by people of the calibre of Leibniz, Kant, Goethe, Weishaupt, Hegel, Fichte, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche and Heidegger, it would a Wonder of the Ages, the great beacon that leads humanity out of the darkness. Abrahamism will never deliver paradise on Earth, and neither will freemarket capitalism or democracy. All sane, rational people must be on the lookout for what will replace these diabolical systems that have ruined so much human potential. The world doesn’t need maniacs like Adolf Hitler (who was just another mad prophet in the direct lineage of Abraham, Moses, Jesus Christ, Saint Paul, Luther, Mohammed and Osama bin Laden), but it craves new thinking, new politics, new economics, new science and new religion – everything offered by Illuminism. A meritocratic New World Order won’t be run by a dictator – nothing could be more repulsive – but by a multitude of dazzling experts, each of whom, if they fail to perform, can be voted out by others in their field of expertise. Science has been so successful because it has been driven by scientific geniuses, not by demagogues, priests, psychopaths and “Joe Average”. It’s crazy not to have a system devoted to putting the brightest human beings in charge. How else will the world get brighter?

Germany versus Britain and America Historically, the German idealism of the Enlightenment constituted the rebirth of ancient Greek philosophy and culture, and the greatest German

thinkers explicitly hailed the ancient Greeks. The Germans were the new Athenians. The British of that time were, on the other hand, the new Romans, and we can include the Americans here given that modern America began as a colony of the British Empire. The British, and subsequently the Americans, were dedicated to trading, money and power rather than ideas and culture. They were devoted to private interests (capitalism) rather than public interests (socialism), to the particular will (privilege) rather than the General Will (meritocracy), to elite dynastic families rather than the community and the nation.

Nietzsche – the Great Socialist Hero? “If we allow that Socialism (in the ethical, not the economic, sense) is the world-feeling which seeks to carry out its own views on behalf of all, then we are without exception, willingly or no, wittingly or no, Socialists. Even Nietzsche, that most passionate opponent of the ‘herd morality’, was perfectly incapable of limiting his zeal to himself in the Classical way. He thought only of ‘mankind’, and he attacked everyone who differed from himself. Epicurus, on the contrary, was heartily indifferent to others’ opinions and acts. But Nietzsche’s Zarathustra – though professedly standing beyond good and evil – breathes from end to end the pain of seeing men to be other than as he would have them be, and the deep and utterly un-Classical desire to devote a life to their reformation – his own sense of the word, naturally, being the only one. It is just this, the general transvaluation, that makes ethical monotheism and – using the word in a novel and deep sense – socialism. All world improvers are Socialists.” – Oswald Spengler This is a crucial point. Where socialism is about morality and ethics, capitalism is not. Capitalism places an “invisible hand” of self-interest at its core, and then expects good things to happen. Capitalism is the assertion that the absolute pursuit of selfishness is the highest “moral” good. It’s no accident that ultra capitalist Ayn Rand preached the “virtue of selfishness”. The defining doctrine of all capitalists is, “Greed is good”. Spengler labelled Nietzsche a “socialist”, by which he meant “moralist” and someone obsessed with the quality of humanity. Nietzsche himself consistently castigated socialism and Western morality, seeing them as

opposed to the development of a higher humanity. Chaim Weizmann said, “Poor, poor Nietzsche ... these Messrs. Socialists are trying to pull their little red cap on that giant genius’s head.” Yet there’s considerable truth in Spengler’s assessment. As Georges Sorel said, “Socialism is a moral question inasmuch as it provides the world with a new way of judging all human actions, or – to use Nietzsche’s famous expression – with a total revaluation of things.” Many socialists accept Nietzschean philosophy as ethical socialism and use his ideas to castigate the ruling order of free-market capitalism, democracy, privilege and Abrahamism. Helene Stötotcker wrote, “The two poles of human evolution, the striving for social justice and the urge for the highest personal development, for me always remained inextricably connected. This for me has for perhaps the last half-century been expressed by the words ‘Nietzsche and Socialism.’” Nietzsche and socialism both had the supreme goal of an “emancipated humanity”. Nietzsche, just as all socialists did, despised the bourgeoisie, seeing them as small-minded, pathetic, feeble last men: insults to the glory of the human race. However, he was certainly no friend of left wing socialism. Nor would he have had anything but contempt for Hitler’s right wing socialism (National Socialism), although he might have found Hitler himself quite interesting, in the manner of a new Cesar Borgia. Nevertheless, Nietzsche was unquestionably an advocate of the transformation of humanity via Supermen (an unstoppable positive liberty force to change the world forever). This makes him a “Catholic”. Free-market capitalism is a negative liberty ideology and is amoral at best and immoral at worst. It entrusts the fate of the world to “markets” which are not thinking, moral people. (Of course, under the surface, markets are people – cartels committed to absolute selfishness and selfinterest who see financial profit as the way to achieve their ends, and don’t mind who they immorally screw over in the process.) In Oscar Wilde’s view, socialism was ultimately all about individualism and the perfection of the individual. He wrote, “The new individualism, for whose service Socialism, whether it wills it or not, is working, will be perfect harmony. It will be what the Greeks sought for, but could not, except in thought, realise completely because they had slaves, and fed them; it will be what the Renaissance sought for, but could not realise completely

except in art, because they had slaves, and starved them. It will be complete, and through it each man will attain to his perfection. The new individualism is the new Hellenism.” It must be stressed that socialism is about the optimisation of the individual within the context of society and the State whereas capitalism is about the optimisation of rich individuals outside the context of society and the State. Socialism is always concerned with the “public” person, and capitalism with the “private” person. All of those who wish to revalue all values – to get rid of Abrahamism, democracy, free-market capitalism, rich elites, privileged dynastic families – are consumed by a new and radical social vision and, to this extent, are socialists. The Old World Order, and their fellow travellers, are, on the contrary, conservatives. If you unpick their ideology, you will see that it’s always about negative rather than positive liberty, about the private rather than public interest, about individuals and families rather than community, about God rather than humanity. Instead of being “social”, it’s anti-social. The world would be transformed if it changed its focus from economics to ethics, from private, particular wills to the public, General Will. All rational left wingers look to the General Will and the State. Right wingers, none of whom is rational, always look to the private, the particular, the individual. Right wingers always favour the individual and family over the community and collective. Left wingers are “Catholic” and right wingers “Protestant”. “Catholics” are socialists and “Protestants” capitalists. “Protestants” believe in the “work ethic” and “Catholics” in the value, quality and morality of work. Life is not about working hard, it’s about working well. Slaves worked hard and what reward did they get? To wish for the whole of humanity to be optimized and fulfilled is the supreme left wing, socialist, “Catholic” vision. The supreme right wing, capitalist, “Protestant” vision is for an individual or family to scramble to the top of the pile and look down on the rest of humanity. In other words, right wingers are obsessed with the particular good, never the general good. They see the world in Darwinian terms, as a savage contest, in which a few will win and most will lose. They have no concept of everyone winning through rational cooperation. It’s impossible to see how we can ever have a paradise on Earth – a paradise for all – while right wingers exist who continually resist, subvert and sabotage that view. In a real ethical sense, all right wingers are evil.

They are demonic and Satanic ... the barrier to the maximisation of human potential, the primary obstacle to humanity commencing its journey to divinity. Left wingers dream of everyone working together to produce the optimal result for all. Right wingers dream of working with their friends and cronies to put their respective families at the apex of the power pyramid, ruling over everyone else. Left wingers know that they must optimise the State in order to optimise the people. Right wingers pick up their guns if the State comes anywhere near them. They are fundamentally opposed to the State, and that’s why they ought to be expelled from any State that wishes to succeed and to practise morality and ethics. There’s only one Catholic Church, but countless Protestant sects. Why? Because the Catholic Church is a universal, general, collective vision while Protestantism is a private, particular, individualist vision. If a Protestant doesn’t get exactly what he wants from his current Protestant religious sect, he simply sets up a new one more to his liking. Protestantism is about consumerism, individualism, opposition to the collective, getting what you want, never compromising with others, and, indeed, having contempt for others. Is that you?

The Nietzschean Tough Cure “I love the man who creates higher than himself and perishes in this way.” – Nietzsche “Dr. Nietzsche either cures his parents radically or kills them.” – J. M. Kennedy “What does not kill me makes me stronger.” – Nietzsche

Attracting the Wrong Supporters “God save me from the Marxists.” – Karl Marx

Jesus Christ Many tales told about Jesus Christ are the same as those told about classical figures of myth and legend. Why isn’t Jesus similarly regarded as a mythical or legendary figure? Why isn’t he treated on a par with Heracles or Zeus? Guess what? – in a thousand years’ time, he will be. The people of

the future will be astounded that there were billions of people in the 21st century stupid enough to think that the tall tales of Abraham, Moses, Jesus Christ and Mohammed belonged to fact rather than fiction. The same people who implicitly believe in Jehovah, reject Zeus out of hand. But what’s the difference? Where is the evidence that Jehovah is any more real in our lives than Zeus or Wotan? The future of religion lies in Logos, not Mythos. Religion will become increasingly mathematical, scientific and philosophical. In a thousand years, no one will believe in Mythos characters. There will be no prophets, no divine revelation, and no holy scripture. Instead, human beings will be exploring the true mathematical answers to existence, and learning how to become Gods themselves.

The God Question God, allegedly, is all-knowing, and knows everything about all of us. But how much does he know about himself? Is God the great introspector? Does he have a Higher Self? A Lower Self? Does he have an unconscious? Humans ask why they exist. Does God ask why he exists? How does God account for himself, for his own existence? He’s surely not much of a thinker if he says, smugly, “Hey, I just am. I am that I am.” What does God give as the answer to everything? Isn’t it absurd if he gives himself as the final solution? What’s for sure is that the ultimate answer cannot lie in a being but in an eternal system of reason, logic and causality. That system is of course ontological mathematics. God doesn’t produce ontological mathematics: it produces him.

God the Liar Genesis 2:16-17: “Of every tree of paradise thou shalt eat. But of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat. For in what day soever thou shalt eat of it, thou shalt die the death.” God says Adam will die if he eats from the tree of knowledge, but Adam doesn’t die, so God’s a proven liar, hence not God. Apologists for God will try to argue that what is meant by this passage is that Adam will lose his divine immortality and become mortal. But if that’s what is meant then why isn’t it said? If God can’t communicate effectively and clearly then he’s not God! Moreover, Adam would have no idea that he had lost his immortality

until the moment of his death – which came long, long after he ate the fateful apple. Moreover, how can it be said that Adam is mortal if his true essence – his soul – remains immortal, exactly as before? Adam cannot die. Bodily death is neither here nor there if a person’s true essence continues regardless. God literally put a fatal tree (one that would cause you to “die the death”) – with deliciously tempting fruit – right in front of Adam and Eve. Imagine parents putting lethal bleach in a Coke bottle in front of a child and telling it not to drink. What kind of parent would ever do anything so insane? If the child drank, it would not be its fault, only that of its reckless, irresponsible, dumb parents. The message of the tale of the Garden of Eden and its deadly tree could not be clearer: “God” regards the pursuit of knowledge as a fatal mistake. (“Reason is the Devil’s whore.” – Luther) This makes it the most evil and retarded tale of all time, and anyone who endorses it should not be considered part of the human race, but one of the damned.

Enlightenment If you’re enlightened, you have no need of the institution of the Church. You don’t need priests, bishops, cardinals or popes. Gnosticism – the ancient pursuit of enlightenment – was a deadly threat to the Church’s control since it rejected all of the Church’s methods of control, and its controlling personnel. It valued secret knowledge held by the wisest of men. If you analyze the modern world, you will see that it’s guided by the precept of follow the money. Money is the currency of power. In the ancient world, religion, royalty and the army were the sources and currency of power. Gnostics were not part of mainstream religion, rejected royalty as the servants of the Devil, and had no army – hence were powerless, and ripe for persecution. Which is exactly what they got. Where Gnostics seek redemption from ignorance, Believers pursue redemption from sin. These are two radically different mindsets. The Gnostics are always actively accumulating knowledge. The Believers, on the other hand, simply seek to avoid whatever has been defined as “sin”. Believers are those who let someone else’s definition of belief control them. Gnostics are those who assess the knowledge provided by the wisest

of minds and agree with it or reject it. Gnostics are free, Believers imprisoned. “I must create a system or be enslaved by another man’s.” – William Blake The Protestant creates his own system based on faith and scripture; the Gnostic does so on the basis of reason and knowledge. Faith is highly individualistic; reason is highly communal – all reason converges on the same eternal, Platonic truths. Gnostics reject Churches but embrace meritocratic secret societies. A Gnostic will accept no Pope of faith, but he will certainly accept a Grand Master of rational knowledge.

Sport and Corporatism Sport has now become entirely corporate: it’s the athletic wing of the corporate domination of the world. The reason why it’s so closely tied to corporations is that’s it’s all about winners. It’s imperative for corporate advertising and branding to be associated with success and victory in order to persuade the impressionable punters to but their products (in the vain hope that it will somehow make them more successful in life). The corporate message could not be simpler: you’re a winner if you buy our products and a loser if you don’t. Sport is thus a metaphor for corporate activity. The most successful companies can pay the most to be endorsed by the most successful sportspeople. The money on offer to sporting winners keeps spiralling upwards because they are the means by which corporations sell themselves to the masses who follow sport and by which they establish their “winning” brand. The consumerist masses are so dumb that they think that they must buy the same brand of razor blades as a leading tennis player (who has been paid a fortune to endorse them) in order to somehow partake of his success and winning ways. In essence, the whole of human existence revolves around the axis of winners versus losers, and nothing exemplifies this more than sport (which is why it’s so popular). Everyone wants to win and no one wants to lose. This is the most universal description of human beings that you can possibly get. It goes to the heart of the master-slave dialectic (all masters are winners and all losers are slaves). It goes to the heart of religion (all winners go to

heaven and all losers to hell). It goes to the heart of economics (the rich are winners and the poor are losers). It goes to the heart of politics (each party claims that it will turn you into a winner). It goes to the heart of celebrity culture (all famous people are deemed winners). It goes to the heart of beauty (the beautiful are winners and the ugly are losers; slim people are winners and fat people are losers). It’s everywhere, in everything. All people at all times want to win – to feel their power increasing (and this is the basis of pleasure and happiness) – and no one ever wants to lose – to feel their power decreasing (and this is the basis of pain and misery). Sport makes a drama out of winning and losing. It provides an arena for the contest and a clock counting down to ensure that the winners and losers will be identified in a specific timeframe. It’s the microcosm for human life itself.

Margaret Thatcher In 1984, Margaret Thatcher prayed to God when the Irish Republican Army (IRA) bombed the hotel in which she was staying. Was she praying to the same God to whom the IRA bomber prayed? The bomb successfully went off – does that mean that God was listening to the IRA man? Thatcher didn’t die, although others did – does that mean that God was looking after Thatcher (in which case, why was the bomb allowed to go off at all?) Isn’t it odd that both sides pray to the same God? How can that be?

Gnosticism Gnosticism is about liberating the divine spark. It concerns experiential wisdom, true knowledge, lighting the lamp within your soul. Your divine spark is your ultimate treasure – your God Self. One of the greatest twists of history was that the Gnostic Christian leader Valentinus came close to being elected Pope, in which case the history of Christianity would have been completely different (it would have been Gnostic and based on knowledge rather than Catholic and based on faith), and we might now be living in paradise. A central claim of Gnosticism is that Jehovah is evil, and the Jews, as his “Chosen People”, are the damned. All Gnostics say that humanity is superior to Jehovah. We are moral and he is immoral. He’s jealous of us and

afraid that we will supplant him. Jehovah was a divine miscarriage. Or an abortion that survived. Gnosticism was historically opposed to the large-scale, institutional, pyramidal Church. Instead, it proceeded by way of small, intimate, meritocratic groups and secret societies. What is gnosis? It’s intuitive, visionary knowledge sufficient to yield the enlightenment required to escape this Satanic world.

Theocracy versus the State Theocracy says that the purpose of the State is to serve God, and that it’s the task of theocrats to inform the people of what God wants. Meritocracy says that purpose of the State is to serve the people, and that it’s the task of meritocrats to work out how best to maximize the people’s potential. God has nothing to do with it.

The Two Tribes Imagine that the world consists of two tribes, one rich and one poor. The rich tribe gets richer and richer and the poor tribe poorer and poorer. There’s a political party for the rich and one for the poor. The rich party always wins because it promotes the idea that if any of the poor tribe are “good enough”, they can join the rich tribe and enjoy the good life. The poor party talks about everyone being “equal”, but in fact all the leaders of the poor party come from the rich tribe, though no one ever comments on this. Everyone in the poor tribe imagines that if they work hard, keep their noses clean and do what the rich tribe want, they will be promoted to the rich tribe and everything will be wonderful. They fail to notice that almost no one ever leaves the poor tribe, that you’d be more likely to be struck by lightning than escape poverty. A radical new party comes along called the Reboot Party, which seeks to end once and for all the existence of the two tribes. It proposes to implement 100% inheritance tax, so that all the wealth accumulated by anyone will go, on death, to the Commonwealth (all the people) rather than to the rich tribe alone. It says that with this simple measure it will reboot the world and deliver equal opportunities for all. Only the most talented will rise to the top, not those who merely inherit what someone else earned. Well, for whom will you vote? Will it be the rich party, the poor party or the reboot party? The future of the world is in your hands.

Division and Decision “To decide is to divide.” – Tony Blair This is certainly true. All decisions that have winners and losers are inherently polarizing. They will be supported by those they help and resisted by those they harm. The biggest problem is that what’s in someone’s long-term interest may be perceived by them to produce a serious loss in the short term. Rationally, it’s best for everyone to accept 100% inheritance tax since it’s the fairest tax of all, and the tax that truly underpins equal opportunities. However, you can be certain it will be resisted to the death by those who will literally lose their fortune, and even by many others who have no fortune.

Because God is a Monster Anyone studying the human condition is confronted with a horrific fact ... half the world worships a God who is a monster, a tyrant and torturer. His followers love him, worship him, think he’s perfect and the quintessence of good. They will gladly kill for him. These are Devil worshippers who believe they are on the side of God and the good. How is such a thing possible? How can humans be so irrational, deluded and mad? How can we beat the lunatics?

The Delusion “We have this fantasy that our interests and the interests of the super rich are the same. Like somehow the rich will eventually get so full that they’ll explode. And the candy will rain down on the rest of us. Like there’s some kind of pinata of benevolence. But here’s the thing about a pinata – it doesn’t open on its own. You have to beat it with a stick.” – Bill Maher You have to beat the rich, and subject them to the law: the inflexible law of meritocracy and equal opportunities.

Catholics and Protestants AM: “Catholics are supposed to accept what they’re fed as dogma, Protestants are allowed to raise questions. On the other hand, Protestantism is destructive to social cohesion.”

So, Protestants are allowed to ask whether Jesus Christ is a fraud and to question the validity of Scripture, are they? What planet is AM living on? All Christians are force-fed dogma. The only questions Protestants are allowed to ask are those that undermine Catholic authority, but not Protestant authority. The Catholic Church says it knows best while the countless splintered Protestant sects say that the Bible “knows” best. Who’s right? Neither! Only reason is right.

Hidden Depths SB: “As the AC website says several times, we are already capable of incredible innate calculation such as catching a moving ball. You don’t need to know mechanics to do that. However, you do need to know mechanics to calculate more complex problems like how rockets work.” Indeed. Unconscious, innate calculations allow us to be fantastic sportspeople, and achieve remarkable individual feats. What they don’t do is allow us to master the world and the universe ... to land men on the moon. To achieve the greatest things, we must use mathematics consciously, not unconsciously. Humanity prospers to the precise extent to which the average person becomes more rational, logical and mathematical. The scientific, technological world we live in was made possible by a handful of brilliant geniuses. Imagine what humanity could accomplish if it had billions of geniuses!

The Loser Enormous religious effort is given over to making you terrified of hell so that you will be cowed into submission and made easy to control. Enormous capitalist effort is given over to tormenting you with the label of “loser”. If you don’t buy the latest objects, it’s because you’re sad, bad, mad, poor, pathetic, out-of-touch, etc. That is, you’re a loser and no one will ever like you, respect you or want to be with you. In religion, those who don’t play ball are the damned; in capitalism, those who don’t play ball are losers. No one wants to be one of the damned or one of the losers. Don’t be a damned loser!

The Capitalist Con

Mark Zuckerberg became a multi-billionaire by getting ordinary people, in the hundreds of millions, to work feverishly to put vast amounts of personal information on his Facebook platform, which he was then able to sell to corporations, marketing companies and advertisers for a fortune. The Facebook users did all the necessary work to make Zuckerberg stinking rich. That’s some trick! Why did Facebook users do all of this free work to enrich Zuckerberg? – because they were terrified of being losers. If everyone else is using Facebook, so must you. Facebook, and all social networking tools, are about terrifying people with the spectre of being outside the loop: unpopular, freaks ... losers. Isn’t it sheer genius to get others to slave away to make you rich? That’s the quintessence of capitalism. It’s all about how a small, rich elite can psychologically manipulate the dumb masses to do exactly what they want. The same is true of religion. Billions of people alive today have been programmed by “prophets” who died thousands of years ago, but whose psychological genius continues to work its sinister “magic” in the present day.

Conviction Politicians versus Consensus Politicians The only politicians who change anything are those with strong convictions. Consensus politicians don’t know what they want, hence always compromise. Meaningful change never comes from consensus between political parties with different worldviews. All you get is a clunky, irrational mess.

Why Do People Believe Nonsense? Overly feeling types can’t stop themselves from believing nonsense. They can’t exercise reason. What is faith if not an emotional belief in something for which there are no rational grounds? Only a feeling person feels no awkwardness in rejecting reason since he doesn’t know what reason is in the first place. Only someone who has never acted through reason could say, as Martin Luther did, “Reason is the Devil’s whore.” Sensing types can’t help themselves either. They are locked into whatever their senses tell them is “real”, and, without their senses, they are

blind. They deny the existence of anything they can’t sense. Intuitives are those who can go beyond the senses. They are not “blind” in the non-sensory realm as sensing types are. However, if they don’t ally their intuitions with reason, they often bring back mystical gibberish. Only the rational – and by rational we mean those who are capable of reflecting upon and comprehending the eternal truths of reason – can transcend nonsense. And these are the rarest people in the world.

The Message What is the key message of Abrahamism? – obey. Never seek knowledge, on pain of death. Reason brings you under the spell of Satan. What kind of retarded person would ever sign up to Abrahamism? It couldn’t be any more intellectually offensive. It’s the gospel of ignorance, the creed of the stupid. Does Jehovah, Jesus Christ or Allah say a single meaningful or plausible thing about the workings of the universe in their “infallible” texts? Every scientific claim made by the sacred texts of Abrahamism has been scientifically refuted. That’s a fact. People go one believing nonsense because they have no ability to exercise reason.

Privilege Privilege: a chumocracy (rule by chums), a cronocracy (rule by cronies), a nepotocracy (rule based on nepotism).

Muslims and Jesus SN: “I’d like to point out that Muslims don’t reject Jesus. They believe that Jesus was a Messenger of God, just like Abraham and Moses. Christians believe in Abraham and Moses, but don’t follow them, and they follow Jesus instead. Likewise, Muslims accept Abraham, Moses and Jesus, but don’t follow them and they follow Mohammed instead.” Muslims do reject Jesus Christ. Christians say Christ is God. Muslims wholly deny this. Therefore they have rejected the God of the Christians. To say that Jesus Christ is a messenger of God (as Muslims do) is to reject in every way the fundamental basis of Christianity. Why do these Muslims lie to themselves that they “accept” Christ? They don’t. They accord him an entirely different and incompatible status from

the one accorded him by Christians. Christians say he is God. Muslims say he is a prophet of God. These are totally different beliefs about the nature of Jesus Christ. They have zero in common. If Christians were to say that Jesus Christ was Allah and Mohammed was Jesus Christ’s prophet like Moses and Abraham, no Muslim would believe that Christians had “accepted” Mohammed. They would consider such a Christian position an abominable heresy and an insult to Mohammed and Allah. Why did SN make this ludicrous statement? Well, you guessed right – he’s a Muslim! Believers have no idea what they’re talking about. Everything they say is false. It’s absurd to say that Muslims “accept” Jesus Christ in the way Christians accept him, and yet SN didn’t hesitate to state his totally false position as a “fact”. There are no facts in Abrahamism, only interpretations.

The “Gold” Coast The north shore of Long Island is nicknamed the “Gold Coast”. It’s where the seriously rich go to be far from the madding crowd (i.e. from the poor and ordinary people). It’s where elite families such as the Vanderbilts, Roosevelts and Guggenheims build mansions that resemble European palaces. These are “old money”, and they have particular loathing for “new money”. Of course, new money has no greater dream than to be accepted by old money and to live side by side with old money, and to become old money themselves. In F Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, old money lives on a Long Island village called East Egg, separated by a short stretch of water from West Egg, where new money (including Jay Gatsby himself) gazes longingly at East Egg. The water that separates the two villages might as well be an ocean or a chasm. Gatsby throws wild, extravagant parties, lavish and opulent, that he hopes will big him up and impress the East Eggians. The Great Gatsby is the great American Novel because it’s all about snobbery, aspiration, the privileged elite and those who wish to emulate them, shallowness, partying, and an insatiable obsession with money (money as the actual basis of existence, acting as the key to love, status, fulfilment and identity – replacing religion as the source of “values” and “morality”). People will sell their souls for money. Daisy Buchanan, the

flapper on whom Gatsby pathologically dotes, has a voice that is “full of money”. Her laugh seems like gold coins jingling. Gatsby, like Joe Kennedy in real life, made his fortune from bootlegging and, like Kennedy, was always despised by “old money”. (And F Scott Fitzgerald, like Kennedy, was a Catholic, hence loathed by the WASP elite.)

***** In The Great Gatsby, between the Long Island idyll (Camelot, so to speak) and New York City is a Waste Land called the “Valley of Ashes”. This is hell itself – because it’s where the poor people live. One might say they have been burned to ash by the greed of the rich, leaving them in squalor and destitution, with no prospects. It’s a foul and ghastly place, a nightmare – the most extreme contrast to Gatsby’s dreamworld (his Las Vegas, his Disneyland, his hyperreality.) The Great Gatsby is all about a society that compulsively lies to itself, that pretends in all things, that fakes its way through life. Everyone is shallow, insincere, phoney, fraudulent and inauthentic. Everyone is acting, role-playing, self-mythologizing. They dance, drink and party to try to blot out reality and existential despair. Jay Gatsby, aka James Gatz, is the supreme fake and hence the ultimate American. Gatsby is America. He’ll do anything for money, and he thinks it will resolve every problem, even love and romance. He thinks he can buy the world, buy all of his heart’s desires. He thinks money makes him respected (it doesn’t; old money still despises him). Gatsby was “Mr Nobody from Nowhere” (according to old money Tom Buchanan). He was a non-entity who achieved the American Dream of becoming fabulously rich, but it proved no cure for his damaged psyche. Gatsby tried to invent an artificial world that would reel in his beloved Daisy, that would spiritually bridge the water between West and East Egg. He failed. That’s the American Nightmare. Jay Gatsby was based on F Scott Fitzgerald himself. Like Gatsby, Fitzgerald was a poor soldier, obsessively aspiring to have a rich, socialite life. Wikipedia says, “Fitzgerald was commissioned a second lieutenant in the infantry and assigned to Camp Sheridan outside of Montgomery, Alabama. While at a country club, Fitzgerald met and fell in love with Zelda Sayre (1900–1948), the daughter of an Alabama Supreme Court

judge and the ‘golden girl,’ in Fitzgerald’s terms, of Montgomery youth society. The war ended in 1918, before Fitzgerald was ever deployed, and upon his discharge he moved to New York City hoping to launch a career in advertising lucrative enough to convince Zelda to marry him. He worked for the Barron Collier advertising agency, living in a single room at 200 Claremont Avenue in the Morningside Heights neighbourhood on Manhattan’s west side. “Zelda accepted his marriage proposal, but after some time and despite working at an advertising firm and writing short stories, he was unable to convince her that he would be able to support her, leading her to break off the engagement. Fitzgerald returned to his parents’ house at 599 Summit Avenue, on Cathedral Hill, in St. Paul, to revise The Romantic Egoist, recast as This Side of Paradise, about the post-WWI flapper generation. Scott was so low on finances that he took up a job repairing car roofs. The revised novel was accepted by Scribner’s in the fall of 1919, and Zelda and Scott resumed their engagement. The novel was published on March 26, 1920, and became one of the most popular books of the year. Fitzgerald and Zelda were married in New York’s St. Patrick’s Cathedral.”

Zelda Fitzgerald “Zelda Sayre Fitzgerald (July 24, 1900 – March 10, 1948), born Zelda Sayre in Montgomery, Alabama, was an American novelist and the wife of writer F. Scott Fitzgerald. She was an icon of the 1920s—dubbed by her husband ‘the first American Flapper’. After the success of his first novel, This Side of Paradise (1920), the Fitzgeralds became celebrities. The newspapers of New York saw them as embodiments of the Jazz Age and the Roaring Twenties: young, seemingly wealthy, beautiful. “From early adolescence Zelda was a formidable presence in southern society, outshining all other southern belles as the star in ballet recitals and elite country club events. Shortly after finishing high school, she met F. Scott Fitzgerald at a country club dance, but was unimpressed and agreed with her family on his limited financial prospects to provide for a family. With his professed infatuation, a light flirtation evolved into a lengthy long distance courtship of weekly letters, with Fitzgerald aware of her uncommitted dating of other men. Determined to obtain financial security, and thus Zelda, Fitzgerald increased his writing from articles to his first book. On March 20, 1920, Scribner’s Sons agreed to publish his novel This

Side of Paradise and Fitzgerald immediately cabled Zelda, who agreed to travel to New York to marry and live with him. The couple wed in New York on April 3, 1920. They spent the early part of the decade as literary celebrities in New York City. Later in the 1920s, they moved to Europe, recast as famous expatriates of the Lost Generation. While Scott received acclaim for The Great Gatsby and his short stories, and the couple socialized with literary luminaries like Ernest Hemingway, their marriage was a tangle of jealousy, resentment and acrimony. Scott used their relationship as material in his novels, even lifting snippets from Zelda’s diary and assigning them to his fictional heroines. Seeking an artistic identity of her own, Zelda wrote magazine articles and short stories, and at 27 became obsessed with a career as a ballerina, practicing to exhaustion. “The strain of her tempestuous marriage, Scott’s increasing alcoholism, and her growing instability presaged Zelda’s admittance in 1930 to the Sheppard Pratt sanatorium in Towson, Maryland, where she was diagnosed with Bipolar disorder. While there, she wrote a semi-autobiographical novel, Save Me the Waltz, which was published in 1932. Scott was furious that she had used material from their life together, though he would go on to do the same, as in Tender Is the Night, published in 1934; the two novels provide contrasting portrayals of the couple’s failing marriage. “Back in America, Scott went to Hollywood where he tried screenwriting and began a relationship with the movie columnist Sheilah Graham. In 1936, Zelda entered the Highland Mental Hospital in Asheville, North Carolina. Scott died in Hollywood in 1940, having last seen Zelda a year and a half earlier. She spent her remaining years working on a second novel, which she never completed, and she painted extensively. In 1948 she died when the hospital she was a patient in caught fire. Interest in the Fitzgeralds resurged shortly after her death: the couple has been the subject of popular books, movies and scholarly attention. After a life as an emblem of the Jazz Age, Roaring Twenties, and Lost Generation, Zelda Fitzgerald posthumously found a new role: after a popular 1970 biography portrayed her as a victim of an overbearing husband, she became a feminist icon. She was inducted into the Alabama Women’s Hall of Fame in 1992.” – Wikipedia

A Jesus ‘Tard

LL: “Precious love ... when I think of Jesus ... and His love for us ... my heart skips a beat. The love He shows is breathtaking, and what he did on the cross is priceless. When I see people wanting to know if Jesus is real, my heart goes out to them. You know why? They don’t feel His precious love, and believe me when I say this: JESUS WANTS THEM TO FEEL IT. JESUS WANTS TO SHOW THEM HOW TRULY REAL HE IS. “TO WHOM THIS MAY CONCERN, open your heart and see how real He is and what He did to set you free. He was tortured for your transgressions and hung on the cross for your SALVATION. AND ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS PUT HIM IN YOUR HEART AND HE WILL SHOW YOU HOW REAL HE IS. WHEN YOU FEEL HIS PRECIOUS LOVE, YOUR HEART WILL KNOW AND ALL YOUR SINS WILL BE WASHED AWAY WITH HIS PRECIOUS BLOOD HE SHED FOR YOU. SO, MY FRIEND, I TELL YOU THIS, WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR? WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO LOSE? WELL, I’LL TELL YOU ... ETERNITY ... YES, WHEN YOU PUT JESUS IN YOUR HEART, YOU GO TO HEAVEN. YOU ASK WHAT IS HEAVEN. IT’S WHERE YOU LIVE FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE WHEN YOU PUT JESUS IN YOUR HEART. IT’S PARADISE FOR ETERNITY, A HOME JESUS HAS BEEN PREPARING SINCE HE SET US FREE. SO, REALY, WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR? HE IS KNOCKING ON YOUR HEART. WANT TO FEEL REAL LOVE? OPEN YOUR HEART AND YOU WILL SEE HOW REAL HE IS. I DID AND, WOW, BEST DECISION I EVER MADE. I PRAY YOU OPEN YOUR HEART AND SEE WHAT TRUE LOVE IS...” This is the typical, irrational, deranged claptrap of Christian fanatics. It’s devoid of reason, facts and evidence and wallows in absolute emotionalism. This is classic statement of a mind permanently trapped in a Mythos fantasy. The woman who wrote it is obsessed with her emotional “relationship” with Jesus Christ and with “paradise”. At no point does she subject any of her statements to any Logos scrutiny. She’s simply incapable of rational analysis. This is the sort of person who will never contribute to an advanced society. She’s more or less functionally retarded. We have tidied up the message somewhat, to make it readable. In its original form, it was like the outpouring of a mental patient, a continuous stream of thought, devoid of punctuation, and filled, as we see, with capitalisation. This is person is mentally ill and using her presentation of

words to shout at the world about her disturbed feelings towards Jesus Christ – the hideous monster who exterminated the whole human race bar Noah and his family, who ordered Abraham to murder his son and who sentenced the entire human race to hell (“Original Sin”). “Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?” – Epicurus Go on, LL, instead of rambling incoherently about “Jesus”, why don’t you provide an answer to Epicurus’ challenge? And if you can’t, keep your embarrassing feelings and fantasies to yourself.

***** “If the concept of God has any validity or any use, it can only be to make us larger, freer, and more loving. If God cannot do this, then it is time we got rid of him.” – James Baldwin Exactly so. Contrast Baldwin’s brilliant insight with LL’s drivel.

History and Herstory? How would history change if we called it herstory? Would it instantly take on a more female and feminine slant?

The Great Day ...when the Romans destroyed the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem.

The Dreadful Day ...when the Jews refused to go away. It takes a lot more than burning a temple to destroy the Devil!

The Target In the Middle Ages, the wealth of the rich Jews made them a target. Why aren’t all the super rich of today a target too? It’s because they now run the world.

The Messiah The Jewish Messiah never comes, so the world remains Godforsaken. The Christian Messiah did come, but the world is still Godforsaken, so a Second Coming is required. Why will that make anything better? It didn’t the first time! Messiah theory is a gospel of despair. Either he doesn’t come, hence is useless, or he does come and the world remains as shitty as ever, hence he’s useless. Either way, he’s useless. Don’t wait for Messiahs. It’s up to us to save ourselves.

The Heavenly Fields Neil Blomkamp’s 2013 movie Elysium depicts a future world where the elite have collectively chosen the ultimate penthouse apartment – a luxury space station colony orbiting Earth. Here, they live a heavenly existence while the rest of humanity exists in squalor and poverty in an overcrowded, dirty, failing world. So, what’s new?

The Survival of the Jews How did Judaism survive once the Jews had been expelled from their “Promised Land”? It’s because Judaism is not a religion at all. No one can doubt that the Jewish God has been refuted by the “facts on the ground”, as the Jews like to say when they are stealing Palestinian land – but rather a way of life. It goes on because it’s a system of brainwashing and it will never go away until Jewish parents are prevented from indoctrinating their children. If Jewish brainwashing ceased, Judaism would perish within a single generation. Thank God!

The Last Men Last men have no ambition, other than to have as easy a life as possible. They are unadventurous and uncreative. They adopt a safety-first attitude. They are interested in small comforts and petty advantages. They never work hard. They do the bare minimum every time. They have no heroism or culture. They are mediocrities. And they want to drag the whole world down with them.

Surrogates

In Jonathan Mostow’s 2009 movie Surrogates, people can stay at home and send out into the world a younger, fitter, more attractive version of themselves (their “surrogate”), which they control remotely via their minds and appropriate technology. The hosts have stopped living in their own right and they’re becoming fat, degenerate and pathetic. Most are afraid to be seen in public in their true state. In our world, most people are remotely controlled by ancient “holy” texts and “sacred” scriptures. They don’t live their own lives but those decreed for them by various ancient, long-dead prophets and gurus. Mohammed has 1.5 billion surrogates doing his bidding. Jesus Christ has two billion. These Abrahamists are disgusting. They’re not human. They are machines sent into the world to execute ancient religious programming. None of them have evolved. In fact, the Muslims of today are much more pathetic, stupid and backward than the Muslims of 1400 years ago. The latter had the excuse that they didn’t know all the knowledge that humanity has accumulated since then. Modern Muslims have no excuse. They have chosen to reject the wisdom of humanity in order to believe ancient bullshit of the worst kind – literally the ravings of a madman.

Islam: The Insane Religion Infinitely Illuminated Rajab: “Your derogatory statements about Islam and Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) will draw appropriate retribution. You are an Islam hater. You miss the facts (of which you claim aren’t any). The record of the Prophet (pbuh) is widely available, and not just in the Quran but in nations that he conquered, colonised and gave freedom to. Just like any other Islam hater, you are not acquainted with the history of the Prophet (pbuh). If you haven’t studied Islam and the Quran, don’t say anything about it. Everything can be proved.” “Say, Believe in it or do not believe. Indeed, those who were given knowledge before it – when it is recited to them, they fall upon their faces in prostration.” – 17:107 Quran A mad Muslim speaks! Note the threats of retribution. Note the meaningless statements. Note the complete lack of any intellectual defence of Islam. Look at any Islamic nation at all in our world. Is even one of them enlightened? They’re all retarded. That’s a simple fact. That’s why the West

walks all over them. Without oil, the Islamic world would be destitute ... nomads living in caves. Note this person’s brainwashed habit of writing pbuh ( “peace be upon him”) every time he mentions Mohammed. Can’t this person think for himself and choose not to say pbuh? Obviously not. He lacks free will. He’s a terrified, superstitious maniac and unquestionably on the Islamic Terrorist Spectrum. He’s spectacularly stupid and unenlightened. We asserted that the tale of Mohammed and the Angel Gabriel is absurd. This clown argued that since Mohammed is a real historical figure (no one ever said he wasn’t) then the Angel Gabriel story must be true – which of course is a non sequitur and total nonsense. The factual existence of Mohammed does not make Allah or the Angel Gabriel factual, or Mohammed’s supposed encounter with the Angel. There’s proof... Really? Well, prove it, you moron.

***** “Oh and if you haven’t studied Islam and the Quran, don’t say anything about it.” You haven’t studied one word of Illuminism, so keep your mouth shut about it. As for Islam, we’ve studied it inside out. It’s nonsense from beginning to end. Just read our books and find out exactly why. Your problem is that you’re completely brainwashed and incapable of rational thought. You’re a Pavlovian dog, conditioned to believe the drivel your parents forced into your brain as a child. You’re a victim of child abuse and mental illness. You are the sort of person that must become extinct before humanity can make any progress. You are the brake on human evolution. You are the hand of the dead past, choking the human future. We desperately require the Final Solution of the Abrahamic problem.

The Big Lie “Some are born great, some achieve greatness, and some hire public relations officers.” – Daniel J Boorstin Free-market capitalism is about using PR to simulate greatness. Is there even one great free-market capitalist or great capitalist company? You must be joking!

The Crying Game A report claims that Americans cry more than anyone else! Why so sad, America?

Net Neutrality “Net neutrality (also network neutrality or Internet neutrality) is the principle that Internet service providers and governments should treat all data on the Internet equally, not discriminating or charging differentially by user, content, site, platform, application, type of attached equipment, and modes of communication. There has been extensive debate about whether net neutrality should be required by law.” – Wikipedia There’s nothing neutral about the internet. It’s totally dominated by corporations, branding, advertising, celebrities and consumerism.

The Dark Ages “Religion had its chance to run the world: it’s called the Dark Ages.” – Unattributed Look at modern Islam. Muslims still live in the Dark Ages. Is Saudi Arabia – the home of Islam – a nation of modernity? You must be joking. “All religion, my friend, is simply evolved out of fraud, fear, greed, imagination, and poetry.” – Edgar Allan Poe Mainstream religions like to claim that religion embodies humanity’s highest values. In fact, it enshrines everything that’s worst. Religion itself is the most stark roadblock to human progress. Only the religion of mathematics can bring the light of reason to the religious sphere.

The Controllers “You just can’t leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution.” – Tyree Scott But those who created the problem are those in charge, and how do you get rid of those in charge? The world is ruled by markets controlled by the rich. So, how do you get rid of markets and the rich? What’s for sure is that a “democratic” election won’t be the blindest bit of use to you.

The elite have designed the system precisely so that those who created the problem are always in charge of the solution (so that they can cover their own tracks, keep their vast profits and make sure no one sends them to jail!). “When you’re watching television, you’re watching the news, you’re being pumped full of fear, there’s floods, there’s AIDS, there’s murder, cut to commercial, buy the Acura, buy the Colgate, if you have bad breath, they’re not going to talk to you, if you have pimples, the girl’s not going to fuck you, and it’s just this campaign of fear and consumption, and that’s what I think it’s all based on, the whole idea of ‘keep everyone afraid and they’ll consume’.” – Marilyn Manson

Literalism JD: “I’m just astonished someone wrote this long, snide thing taking a story – the Bible – that is an allegory to be literal.” Well, we’re not the ones who say the Abrahamic texts are literal. That’s Abrahamists who make that claim. Isn’t it extraordinary that some Christian nut attacks us for rubbishing the Abrahamic claim that their holy books are the infallible word of God, and he makes no attempt to attack the fundamentalist Jews, Christians and Muslims who are 100% insistent that their holy books are absolutely and literally true? Even worse than the believers who accept Abrahamism as literally true are those who call it an allegory. If it’s an allegory then it’s the dumbest and sickest allegory ever. Why does “God” choose to express himself via allegory rather than facts, evidence and rational argument? An allegory is something that has as many subjective interpretations as there are people reading it, i.e. it’s whatever you want it to be.

Allegory There are those who say that it’s an allegory that “God” created the world in six days and rested on the seventh. Why are these people motivated to make such a statement? What would be the point of this alleged allegory? Firstly, and most importantly, why would God communicate the “truth” allegorically rather than factually? Should scientists tell allegories about quantum mechanics rather than teaching actual quantum mechanics? What

function is served by this allegorical method? Does it clarify the nature of reality, the nature of God, the nature of human beings? In fact, the use of allegory in texts that are supposedly explaining the nature of reality has no point at all, and it’s ludicrous to claim that the Abrahamic texts are expected to be treated as anything other than literal truth. Why would “God” prefer Mythos over Logos? If allegory is so great and so helpful, why do we bother with facts, evidence and rational arguments at all? Let’s all just tell allegories to each other and hope everyone catches our meaning. Right? How dumb can these “allegorical” people get?! And how impudent they are to sneer at us. There’s a very simple reason why these people promote the “allegorical” understanding of Abrahamic texts. It’s because they’re fully aware that these texts have been factually refuted in every conceivable way. However, they want to go on believing, so they have to find a way to “explain away” the reality that these ancient, silly books have been formally disproved. Therefore, they appeal to “allegory” so that they can go on believing while not worrying about these texts being wholly false as far as reality as concerned. It’s an act of desperation and irrationality – almost an insane act. As soon as you realize that the Bible has been disproved by science, you should stop being a Christian. If you then claim that the Bible is allegorical rather than factual, you are dishonest, looking for any way to cling to your faith. You are living in “bad faith”, refusing to accept the truth. You prefer to live a lie. The lie comforts you. What would you do without your dumb God and your dumb faith? You are retarded and deceitful. You twist everything to suit your own agenda. As soon as your “facts” are refuted, you simply claim they are allegories hence are “true” on a different level. Yeah, what level is that? – the level of the madhouse! The Arthurian romances are coded Illuminist fiction – allegories, if you will – but look at what underpins them ... the hyperrationalism of ontological mathematics. So, where is the Bible’s hidden rational theory beneath the layer of allegory? There’s no such theory, is there? Jesus Christ did not make one intelligent remark in his entire life. He had no theory of anything at all. He was a master of bullshit. Yet bullshit is exactly what Mythos humans crave. It’s the only thing that makes any sense to them. Their whole lives are bullshit.

The True Religion There is only one true religion, the rational religion of ontological mathematics – Pythagorean Illuminism.

Fear Most religious people are terrified. They seek ways to make themselves less afraid, and there’s no more effective way than simply lying to themselves, using a comforting, easy-to-understand Mythos. The religious ought to adopt Marie Curie’s approach: “Nothing in life is to be feared, it is only to be understood. Now is the time to understand more, so that we may fear less.” Gnosticism is about knowing things while Abrahamism is about believing things. Wouldn’t you rather know?

Achievement What’s the secret of achievement? It’s doing an hour of something valuable every day. By the end of a year, you have accomplished something solid and substantive. Most people can’t be bothered setting aside even one hour a day. ... and they never achieve anything. They fritter away their lives on trivia, distractions and short-term pleasures. To transform yourself, small changes applied over long periods bring about radical alterations. Each day, think and behave a little differently. Each day, learn something new. Each day, accomplish some little task that can be built upon to allow the steady accomplishment of a much bigger task. Most people have no discipline and no ability to plan and that’s why they fail. “I know quite certainly that I myself have no special talent; curiosity, obsession and dogged endurance, combined with self-criticism have brought me to my ideas.” – Albert Einstein

“Need the Relief” All modern movies are blighted by inappropriate jokes at crucial moments – producing instant bathos, anti-climax, and dissipation of tension. Yet, astoundingly, many screenwriters are brainwashed into thinking that tension needs to be released with a light-hearted moment. On the contrary, the

tension needs to be cranked up even more. But, of course, screenwriters are usually inept and don’t know how to increase tension. (That’s why 90% of movies are hopeless, despite the money lavished on them.) So, they insert a ludicrous, cheesy joke and ruin the whole undertaking. How many soldiers under heavy fire, with artillery bombardment creeping ever closer, sit cracking jokes? They’re terrified out of their fucking minds, expecting to die at any moment, and almost literally shitting themselves. Imagine the start of the war movie Saving Private Ryan. Would the beach-landing scene have been effective if Tom Hanks had been gurning at the camera, delivering wisecracks? So why do we get this bizarre behaviour in almost every action movie Hollywood makes? As soon as a tense moment is “defused” with an inappropriate joke, you immediately stop suspending your disbelief. You remember you’re watching a fiction, and you stop caring or being affected by the film. In real life, no one laughs or jokes when they’re in the midst of life-and-death situations. In movies, all the stars are cracking jokes as Thanatos rears up to strike, and that’s exactly why Hollywood movies are so bad, boring and unaffecting. Every screenwriter ought to be fired and replaced by a new breed that understands tension and reality. The ancient Greek tragedians didn’t mar their work with silly jokes to “provide relief for the audience”. Jokes were saved for comedies. That’s where they belong. It’s insane to mix up drama and comedy. Jokes should be banned from horror movies, thrillers and adventures. Another prime reason for the cheesy jokes at crucial moments in movies is to give celebrity actors (“stars”) a chance to hog the camera and deliver a “memorable line”. In other words, jokes are “star vehicles”, designed to allow an actor to look cool or smart or funny or indestructible, or whatever. James Bond movies have become unwatchable because of the sheer volume of inappropriate jokes at tense moments. Such movies are turned into cartoons ... they have no connection with reality. They’re a joke, and supremely boring. To attempt to defuse the general tedium of the story, endless action sequences are inserted, but these themselves are staggeringly dull. They serve no plot function, they don’t advance the story or character arc, they don’t engage our emotions. Who’s bothered about anyone in a car chase? If all the characters died in a huge pile up, you’d simply yawn. You don’t care about any of them. They’re not real and they make no pretence to

be real. James Bond is just about the silliest and least plausible character there has ever been. When was the last time you saw any good movies? If you find one decent movie a year, you’re lucky.

Meritocracy TB: “Your definition of meritocracy is as far from what you say it is as you can get. In a meritocracy, the cream rises to the top to lead, they don’t try to redistribute wealth. They struggle to earn their own wealth based on their own merit.” This is the gospel of a typical ultra right wing American Libertarian nutcase. Note how “merit” is tied purely to wealth. So, all the greatest intellectual and artistic geniuses in human history – none of whom were rich – were all, apparently, lacking in merit. Well, TB needn’t worry, he will never be part of our meritocracy. All the inventions of capitalism would never have been possible without the intellectual merit of the geniuses who promoted the cause of reason over that of faith and wealth. Did capitalism invent reason? No, it’s a parasite that lives off the discoveries of the rational elite. To be more specific, it degrades and dumbs down reason, and turns it into consumerist junk for junk people like TB. Someone such as TB could never grasp the true concept of merit. He believes that your IQ and merit are measured by how large your bank balance is, which must make some of the dumbest people in history (silly celebrities, pop stars, sports stars, Reality TV stars and junk entrepreneurs) the most meritorious individuals in human history. TB, rational thinking isn’t for the likes of you. You don’t have a clue what merit is. TB is from Texas. Hmmmm, no surprise there then. Texas is still stuck in the nineteenth century.

***** TP: “Well TB, I think you will agree then that if individuals are to ‘struggle to earn their own wealth based on their own merit’, then we must take every measure to prevent undue advantages being passed on through inheritance. So that, as you say, ‘the cream rises to the top’. You seem to think we are

socialists or communists. We are not. We believe in hard work and rewarding merit. We also recognize that privilege is the number one obstacle to that being actualized.” Hallelujah!

***** Further wisdom of “TB”: “None of you can defend your position? None of you can explain why the free market which is totally based on merit is evil while social policies which are based on making sure no matter how hard you try you will never succeed past what the weakest members of society can achieve is good? Stop listening to your liberal professors who are only in academia because they can’t make it in a free market, read a book that teaches you facts so you’ll (hopefully) stop basing your political and social ideals on emotions which are the basest reason for making decisions as opposed to true rational thought...” TB is an irrational, emotion-driven person who thinks he’s the model of clear thinking. There are legions of such people: Protestants, capitalists, libertarians, anarchists, conspiracy theorists, and so on. So, TB, when the capitalist free markets went insolvent in 2008 and had to be bailed out by the people (socialism) ... that’s your definition of merit, is it? Maybe you need to start listening to a few liberal professors and get yourself an education. Even better, listen to radical thinkers – humanity’s greatest geniuses. Tell us about Leibniz, you moron. You’ve never even heard of him.

Telling the Truth K: “It’s disgusting how lies roll off their tongues like pearls on silk. That George Orwell quote should be altered to, ‘In times of everyday life, telling the truth is an act of freakishness.’ My problem is that I just realised everyone is lying! All the time. About everything. Just for the hell of it sometimes too! Now I know why everyone stares at me all the time. They have never seen an honest person before. It’s like I’m from another planet. But I removed the ‘sucker’ tattoo from my forehead. I’m done with the creeps. Now I am two steps ahead at all times.”

Sadly, lying is the default for human beings. It has always been that way. What is the only subject where it’s impossible to lie? – mathematics. Mythos is perfect for lying. Logos is the Lie Buster.

Does God Want You? “People will not be in hell because God did not want them, but because they did not want God.” – anonymous Indeed ... yet it won’t be hell but heaven that they’re in ... which they built themselves using their own genius. They are not the slaves of any Torture God. Do you want God? Do you need God? Not if you are becoming God yourself! What kind of person wants God? Are you an abject slave? Don’t you want to be God yourself? If you don’t, you’re pathetic and an insult to the human race. To be with “last men” like you would be hell itself. You will be in hell because you did want God!

Half and Half Remember, half of the people you meet will be below median intelligence, which means the other half will be above. How can you quickly tell which is which? – all the ones who believe in mainstream religion are the bottom half.

100% Inheritance Tax “For all men being originally equals, no one by birth could have the right to set up his own family in perpetual preference to all others forever, and tho’ himself might deserve some decent degree of honours of his contemporaries, yet his descendants might be far too unworthy to inherit them.” – Thomas Paine, Common Sense Why are so many people instantly repulsed by the most rational and fairest tax ever conceived – 100% inheritance tax? This is the tax that decrees that the dead have no rights over the living and cannot shape the world in their own image after they have departed this world. All systems of privilege rely on immense advantages in wealth, power, status and prestige being selectively transmitted via bloodlines (families), thus ensuring the creation and dominance of dynastic families, none of

which is accountable to the people despite having vast and ongoing influence over the people, and denying others the privileges enjoyed by themselves. All parents have a natural desire that their children should have a better life than they did. Being extremely simplistic, and, frankly, almost bestially dumb, most parents conclude that handing over assets to their children is the best way of helping them. In fact, the best thing parents can do is hand over a fair world, a just world, a world of equal opportunities – a world of zero inheritance and privilege. The best things parents can pass onto their children are good habits and attitudes, good manners, high ambition, high intelligence, a strong work ethic, discipline, dedication, good humour, the ability to laugh and love, honesty, dependability, self-respect, self-confidence, a backbone. Any person imbued with these qualities will prosper in a fair world. More or less the worst thing parents can pass on is a money-based inheritance in a grotesquely unfair world of scumbags, sleazebags and everyone trying to screw over everyone else. Many fanatical right wingers despise the Welfare State, whereby people are given money for doing nothing. These same people define their lives according to how much money they can pass onto their children, who, of course did nothing at all to earn it – just like the welfare scroungers! Has there ever been such hypocrisy, inconsistency and irrationality? Inheritance is simply the Welfare State for rich people – for spoiled brats, heirs and heiresses, for trust fund parasites, for the Paris Hiltons of the world. It’s even more disgusting than the Welfare State for poor people since the latter at least have the excuse that they had no control over their lives, and no good choices. To accept an inheritance of anything more than a small token amount – enough for a nice commemorative vacation, say – is nauseating. Only a parasite with no backbone would accept it. Any parent who passes on a vast inheritance is insulting their children, and any children who accept it are pathetic and pointless, incapable of making their own way in life. They have already failed as human beings. They are total losers and beneath contempt. Nothing has harmed our world more than hereditary titles, inheritance, privilege and generational brainwashing. All of these pernicious influences must be swept away once and for all.

***** All right wing parents want to rig the world for their children via inheritance and privilege. This desire shows contempt for their children – because it’s a tacit admission that they don’t expect their children to prosper under their own steam. Their children need their parents’ big helping hand. It infantilizes their children. Secondly, it shows contempt for everyone else. These right wing parents see no reason why they shouldn’t get away with harming others by rigging the game against them. Such parents are stupid, selfish and even evil. They are narcissists who think that they must go on defining their children’s lives even after death. How patronising, pathetic and insulting can you get?!

The Declaration of Independence LR: “You misinterpret the Constitution and the Declaration. The Declaration of Independence refers to rights which are inalienable. This is called natural law. Inalienable means that by nature of being created by God we have rights which are the exact opposite of what you claim they are.” Er, you are the one who is totally mistaken. There is no Creator, and no laws can flow from a non-existent being. You are stating a fanatical belief, not a rational fact. Is your God a signatory to the American Constitution? Plainly not. He has nothing to do with the American Constitution. It’s a 100% manmade Constitution, and all “rights” it confers are defined and enforced by men. There are no such things as “natural” rights in human societies. Go and live in the jungle if you want to see how nature handles “rights”. You are an ignorant, God-intoxicated clown who tries to tie your fantastical and fanatical religious beliefs to manmade laws. They have no connection whatsoever. Do you think you’re one of the Chosen People? Do you think you have a sacred Covenant with your “God”? How ludicrous it is for someone to cite their partisan, sectarian God as someone who is party to a Constitution intended for all. “God” in the American Constitution is simply a rhetorical device. The God of the Founding Fathers certainly wasn’t the Christian God. The Declaration of Independence refers to “Nature’s God” rather than “God”. Plainly, a subtle reference is being made here to a deist or even

pantheist view of God rather than the theist view. There’s also a reference to a “Creator” whose nature is not defined, to “Divine Providence”, and to the “Supreme Judge of the world”. All of this could have been said by any ancient Stoic. This is no kind of Christian document. Jesus Christ isn’t mentioned at all. The Treaty of Tripoli (1797) explicitly say, “As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion ... it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.” The word “God” does not appear at all in the American Constitution. The problem that libertarian Christian Fundamentalist nutjobs have is that they do not want a Constitution. Rather, they want a Covenant with their God whereby human governments have little or no rights to do anything. These people believe in theocracy rather than democracy or meritocracy. They are no different from the Muslim maniacs who want the Koran and Sharia Law enshrined in the “Constitution”. These are the worst enemies of reason and freedom you could possibly get. They don’t accept human and civil rights – established by human governments – but only those rights conferred by “God”. Of course, God does not confer any rights at all. We are simply slaves who must do whatever he wants and he is under no constraint to do what we want. LR: “Government cannot take natural rights away but only violate them because they inhere in our very nature as human persons. It’s like saying we breathe. Government can’t change that.” Government can and does take laws away and amend them. Have you never heard of the Amendments to the American Constitution? The Government can put people to death, hence can stop them from “breathing”. No animal in the jungle has any “right to breathe”. LR: “The Constitution grants Government very limited rights.” Or very extensive rights, depending on your interpretation. The Declaration of Independence says, “Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” This implies that government power is unlimited, provided the people consent. Consent is thus the basis of power. The government is not constrained not to act, as

libertarians constantly assert. The government can do anything it wants if the people agree. LR: “The Founders only wanted to create an environment of freedom. The Constitution was designed to limit government so it did not interfere with that.” The Constitution was designed to allow freedoms not available in European monarchies. It was designed not to limit good government but to limit tyrannical government, which is a wholly different concept. You are a libertarian anarchist with a fanatical belief that government is inherently bad. For sure, any government comprised of people like you would constitute an appalling tyranny that all decent people would resist, but there are plenty of good, intelligent, talented people who can provide good governance. LR: “The Founders never believed that government owed us anything other than a very limited set of powers. It left our wellbeing up to each individual.” The Founders believed in establishing an environment that maximized the skills and talents of the people. There is nothing in the American Constitution that would oppose enormous government intervention, if required. America in wartime has harnessed the whole nation to serve the interests of the government and State. LR: “Congress is given a set of limited powers. Each administration, Republican or Democrat, has exceeded those powers.” In your fanatical libertarian opinion. LR: “Congress has enumerated powers. Government has limited rights. Not the person. Law is there to ensure that we don’t step on each other’s toes, not to tell one person what they owe to anyone else.” And how can the Law stop people from stepping on each other’s toes if it does not define the nature of acceptable relations between people, and their duties and obligations to others? You’re a fool, blinded by prejudice. You’re the victim of cognitive and confirmation bias to an extraordinary degree. You are a religious and political fanatic, espousing extremist Libertarianism

and Christian Fundamentalism – an utterly toxic brew. You have no place in a Meritocracy.

The Elephant and the Jews The BBC produced a documentary series called “The History Of The Jews”, presented by the Jewish historian and self-proclaimed, “unapologetic” Zionist Simon Schama, frequently seen wearing a Jewish skullcap – so we’re getting complete historical impartiality (not!). The idea of historians as unpartisan analysts is a joke. They do nothing but spout propaganda. Schama tells the story of the poor Jews being horribly persecuted by the vile goyim. Not once does Schama address the elephant in the room – why have the Jews been hated by everyone throughout history? When will there be a documentary about that, presented by one of the goyim? Schama despised the French Revolutionary leaders Robespierre and Saint-Just. Well, they were in no need of lessons in morality from a Jew who worships the cosmic Torture God. Jewish footballers frequently ask not to play during the Jewish festival of Yom Kippur (the Day of Atonement) since it is regarded as unacceptable to work or play sport that day. One must hope that these Jewish players also find it “unacceptable” to accept their salary when they have refused to comply with their contractual obligations, but one doubts it! Religion should be kept completely out of sport and any nation or sportsperson who refuses to do so should be banned.

***** The Jews have plenty to atone for. They were the first human beings to worship the Devil and call him “God”. Yom Kippur should be given over to atoning to the rest of the human race, not to their Satanic Lord.

Reason or Faith: the Final Fork in the Road Every person in the world should be asked to state whether they think the universe should be understood via reason (Logos) or faith (Mythos). The two groups should then be permanently separated. The Mythos group will soon become extinct while the Logos group will become divine.

There is no room at all for faith. Faith is mental retardation, and a retarded humanity can never become a divine humanity. All people of faith believe in some ancient prophet or guru, some ancient storybook called a “holy” text, which allegedly reveals the infallible thoughts and wishes of God. This worldview is absurd and intellectually offensive in every conceivable way. Faith and the Mythos tales that sustain it must be eradicated ... wiped forever from the human condition. People of faith are subhuman.

Fuck Fuck Allah. Fuck Mohammed. Fuck Jehovah. Fuck Abraham. Fuck Moses. Fuck Jesus Christ. Fuck all practising Jews. Fuck all practising Muslims. Fuck all practising Christians. Fuck them all. The Final Solution of the Abrahamic problem is needed before humanity can begin its next stage of evolution ... to divinity. It’s time for the smart to take action against the stupid. It’s immoral to do otherwise. Humanity’s future is at stake.

The Madmen One of the most disturbing features of the American far right (the anarchocapitalist libertarians) is that they believe that the American Constitution is not manmade but Godmade. They view it as a sacred Covenant with God. They regard America as the Promised Land and themselves as the Chosen

People. To them, God has given them “natural rights” – as enumerated in the Constitution and Declaration of Independence – and only these are valid. Anything else is “manmade” and ought to be resisted as an insult to God. Of course, just as the whole of Judaism is false if there is no Jewish God (or if he’s actually the Devil!), so the whole of the right wing American interpretation of the Constitution is false if their God doesn’t exist. All of their “natural” rights are bogus and are in fact manmade rights (which they abhor). It’s staggering that these morons can drag “God” into humanly constructed documents and laws. What’s wrong with them? How can they expect to be taken seriously if they invoke an invisible, bearded old Sky God who belongs to ancient, silly myths? The Christian “God” has nothing to do with America, nothing to do with the Constitution and nothing to do with natural laws. The American Declaration of Independence famously states: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Of course, no definition whatsoever of “Creator” is given. If American Christians choose to imagine that their God is the Creator, that’s their interpretation. Nowhere is it stated that this is the case. The document is in fact a deist declaration and more or less makes the atheistic Spinozaist assertion that “God” = Nature. In the introduction to the Declaration of Independence, explicit reference is made to “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God”. To speak of Nature’s God is tantamount to equating God and Nature, as Spinoza did. America’s Founding Fathers were enlightened deists or even pantheists, not endarkened theists. If they could have got away with it, they would have repudiated the Christian God! Illuminatus Thomas Jefferson was insistent on Church and State being kept separate. The American far right has consistently tried to commandeer the American Constitution to unite Church and State and make it a vehicle of their Torture God. Jefferson would be appalled. The American right are staggeringly ignorant of the religious views of their Founding Fathers, and of the enlightened, deistic, pantheistic and atheistic philosophical context in which they operated and wrote. Moreover, their greatest heroine is Ayn Rand – a God-hating, money-loving atheist from a privileged Russian Jewish background. Talk about inconsistency. The trouble for the American

far right is that they have no idea whether they worship Jehovah, Jesus Christ, Mammon or Satan (and perhaps they’re all one and the same!).

Categorisation KKM: “Putting all people into a category is being ignorant.” “An idea is always a generalization, and generalization is a property of thinking. To generalize means to think.” – Hegel So, should we listen to Hegel, one of the greatest geniuses of all time, or KKM, a cat-loving Buddhist who hates generalizations and categories, i.e. who hates thinking! It’s extraordinary that so many morons imagine they have something meaningful to say. They don’t. No chimpanzee on Earth has anything to contribute to human knowledge (except as an object of human study). The same is true of human retards. That’s a fact, whether you like it or not. The people who advance human knowledge belong to a tiny minority of rational people.

Mindfucking BVL: “A child is born. It has nothing. Another child is born elsewhere. It also has nothing. These first few seconds of life are the only time that these two little humans will be on a level playing field. One is handed to its mother, a woman who, although having worked hard for her whole adult life, has made little headway in a financially cruel world. The other is handed to its mother, a woman who has never worked at all but has lived a life of privilege due to the fact that her parents amassed a fortune built on the fortune they in turn inherited from their parents. “Is it fair or is it not fair that these two little humans should grow up on a level playing field, that they should reap the rewards of their own efforts in life, that they should be able to be born free and not born into slavery to the ones who have perfected financial cruelty over generations? Should a newborn child have nothing to look forward to but a life of slavery? Of course not. I completely agree that inheritance should be collected by the State. It will stop the super rich in their steps. It will strip them of motivation to step on others lives to become super rich too. I mean, why bother if the State is going to take it anyway? I’m sure that it would still be possible to get grandma’s antique tea set or family mementos.

“Should a child be mindfucked by religion before it has a chance to grow up and make its own decisions about what it believes? Should it be allowable to block a child’s ability to develop and grow naturally? As a person born into the Jehovah’s Witness religion, subject to mindfucking from infancy, to depression and anxiety that came from the realisation that my whole realty, everything I believed and knew to be true was in fact a lie, I say an emphatic NO! It’s not fair. I can’t begin to tell you the fear I felt when I finally realised that although growing up believing I was never going to die I was in fact, going to die one day. It’s the ultimate mental cruelty to inflict on a human, believe me. I have decided that if it means shouting from the rooftops I WILL spend the rest of my life doing anything I can to liberate others from the effects of religions mindfucking. “If you are for freedom, if you are for equality, if you are for equal opportunity, fairness, reward for effort then you are for meritocracy, and you ARE for the New World Order.”

The Love Delusion GS: “I can’t imagine a God who loves me so much that He gave His only begotten son to die for the sins of mankind. I have children and I am not sure I could allow one to die for that cause. God gave His all, His son Jesus Christ to die for all of us. It’s time we came back to God as you see we have been getting further and further away and allowing them to try and put a wedge between God and self. God so LOVED the World. Instead of allowing the NEW WORLD ORDER to be ushered in we need to all stay focused on the NEW WORLD HEALING to be ushered in. Loving all of mankind because the dark side hates it. Love is the key!” Yet another irrational Christian nutter. God can’t die, so God didn’t give his Son for our “sins”. Anyway, who was it who sentenced the whole of humanity to hell in perpetuity for the “Original Sin” of Adam and Eve? Well, none other than Jesus Christ, the Christian God. No sane person would ever imagine sending billions of his own Creations to hell forever because of a trivial act of eating an apple, yet that’s what Jesus Christ – the God of absolute hate and evil – chose to do. Everyone who gets on their knees to Jesus Christ is a Devil Worshipper and slave of the Torture God. Jesus Christ, the Christian God, ordered

Abraham to murder his own son. Murdering sons is de rigueur for Jesus Christ. So, if Christianity is a monotheism and Jesus Christ is the Christian God then who was it who sent his “Son” to be killed? Answer that one, you fucking Christian ‘tard. How many Gods do you believe in? If the Virgin Mary was impregnated by the Holy Spirit then the Holy Spirit was Jesus Christ’s “Father”. Instead of blabbering on about “love”, why didn’t you try to master reason – something in which you are spectacularly deficient.

Faith Faith has no positive qualities. It’s the true “Devil’s whore”. It’s the means by which weak-minded, stupid, credulous, ignorant, superstitious people allow themselves to be manipulated, exploited and controlled by the narrative of the elite. The strong always say the same thing – “We are God’s representatives on Earth. To disobey us is to disobey God. If you obey us, you have obeyed the will of God and will be rewarded with paradise; otherwise you will go into the infernal fire and never come out.” Staggeringly, billions of humans buy into this infantile nonsense. Their understanding of reality is based on this idiotic Mythos. Such people can make no positive contribution to humanity. The faithful must perish en masse. Faith must be expelled from the human condition if we are to have a rational world achieving great and wondrous things.

Passion “To play a wrong note is insignificant; to play without passion is inexcusable!” – Beethoven To make mistakes in life is inevitable; to live without passion and commitment to a cause is inexcusable! What is your sacred cause?

Life This is Life. Do not be a spectator. Be a participant.

Avatar

Avatar, the famous 3D movie by James Cameron, is just cosmic “cowboys and Indians”. However, in this movie, the cowboys are the baddies. In fact, they’re the descendants of the pioneers of the Wild West. They’re freemarket, anarcho-capitalist libertarians! They are completely selfish, have no morality, have absolute contempt for others, and will stop at nothing to make a profit. Like Ayn Rand, they worship the dollar. They are perfect reflections of the psychopathic “heroes” Rand wrote about in Atlas Shrugged. Their obsessive pursuit of “unobtainium” is symbolic of the capitalist obsession with gold, assets, power and wealth. They are like the “Jewish” dwarves of Wagner’s Ring Cycle, wholly driven by greed, selfishness and gold lust. The indigenous people of planet Pandora are the sci-fi equivalent of Native Americans. They are at one with nature, they have natural Gods, they own no property and they have simple technology (unlike the “cowboys” who have enormous machines and weapons of mass destruction). The “cowboys” are Randian individualists; the “Indians” are a spiritual collective (in fact, they’re almost communists!). Given that just about everyone involved in the making of Avatar was a capitalist American, it shows that America has a devastatingly fractured psyche. Many American capitalists are full of self-loathing. Just as Jews who condemn Judaism are known as self-hating Jews, so we must acknowledge the existence of many self-hating capitalists. Avatar says that capitalism has no redeeming features whatsoever and that America would have been a much better place if it had been guided by the values of the naturalistic, communistic Native America rather than those of Judaic-Protestant capitalists (the unholy alliance of Jewish financiers and WASP freemasons that we know as the evil axis of Wall Street and Washington D.C.). Isn’t it time that America did indeed retrace its steps and look to the Native American culture to radically change its attitude to rapacious, predatory capitalism? Isn’t it time for Wall Street to be demolished ... or transferred to a reservation in the middle of the desert?!

Proof JL: “You cannot prove or disprove god. Your intellect disturbs me.”

Of course, you can prove or disprove God – rationally! “God” is either a rationally tenable concept or it’s not. The Abrahamic God is not rationally tenable if it’s claimed that he is an all-powerful, morally perfect Creator who made everything but did not make evil and is somehow not responsible for evil. To repeat what Epicurus said, “Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?” This is the rational disproof of God. No theist has ever been able to refute it.

The Christian Con Why did Christianity prove so successful? It certainly wasn’t because it had anything to do with the truth. It was because it was a fantastically potent and multi-faceted Mythos. The Old Testament Christian God was a God of Power, Authority, Violence, Control and Punishment. The New Testament Christian God was a God of Love, Compassion, Forgiveness, Humility and Peace. So, the Christian Mythos covers every base, despite the two Testaments being a 100% contradiction of each other. Gnostic Christians saw straight away that the God of the Old Testament stood for the opposite of the God of the New Testament, hence was none other than the Devil himself. Almost nothing is more astounding than that Christians should accept the Old and New Testaments as describing the same God. They couldn’t be more different. But Christians don’t care about facts, evidence and reason, only Mythos. What could be better than a religion that with one face preaches total obedience to power, and, with its second face, preaches love and compassion. No religion has ever been more two-faced than Christianity, and Christians are the most two-faced people you can imagine. If Christians actually believed in the New Testament, they would be communists – as the original Christians effectively were! Communism is simply secular Christianity. “Hypocrites. You cannot serve God and money.” – Jesus Christ [You cannot be a Christian and a free-market capitalist obsessed with profit.]

The “Golden Injection” The golden injection is the final morphine injection administered by doctors to finish off patients in their last hours of life. Isn’t it time for a golden injection for Abrahamism, Karmism and scientific materialism?

Hate We are often accused of making “hate speeches” and being intolerant, especially towards Muslims, Jews and Christians. If, as we assert, these people are Devil worshippers who kneel to the Torture God, despise reason, and have relentlessly persecuted all freethinkers, heretics, infidels and apostates, then what kind of people would we be if we did not express our revulsion for, and opposition to, these monsters? Are those who condemn us willing to speak warmly of Hitler and the Nazis, of Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot, and to denounce anyone who dares to criticize these dictators? The “God” of Abrahamism is guilty of every possible crime against the human race. If you don’t hate him then you love all tyrants, mass murderers, persecutors and psychopaths. So, put up or shut up. Either declare your allegiance to the Torture God or denounce him as the ultimate cosmic Nazi. There is no intermediate position. There’s no room in the world for those blind, emotional people who tolerate the intolerable.

“Natural” Inheritance In the jungle, does any animal pass on any “legal” assets to another animal of its choice? The idea is laughable. Inheritance of legal assets is the least natural thing there is. In the jungle, the strong take whatever’s going. No “family inheritance” is ever witnessed. In our absurd world, the strong of the past (the dead) are allowed to control the strong of the present (the living) via inheritance and privilege – an insult to natural law. The strong have arranged the laws of nations to ensure that they go on dominating life after their deaths. When weak children are given enormous wealth, thus making them artificially strong, and stronger in society than the naturally strong, then decadence and degeneration are the inevitable outcomes.

If we want a strong, healthy world, the weak should never be given the means to bully the strong. And nor should it be the mission of the strong to bully the weak but rather to make the weak strong too. The world can’t have enough strong, autonomous, smart, hard-working, talented people. The more we have, the closer we are to paradise on earth and a divine future. Inheritance is the gospel of the weak. No strong person would ever accept an inheritance from anyone because he thereby allows the person from whom he is inheriting to define his life. To accept a vast fortune is the easiest and also the weakest thing anyone can do. It exemplifies that the person has no strength and character of his own. He’s a weakling who wants others to shape his destiny. If you haven’t made your fortune yourself, you’re a parasite. If you have made a fortune, you make your children into parasites if you pass it on to them. You are a worthless parent if you do so. You do not love your children, you hate them. You don’t believe they can make their own way in life. The State should take the matter out of parents’ hands by imposing 100% inheritance tax.

***** “Nothing can stop the man with the right mental attitude from achieving his goal; nothing on earth can help the man with the wrong mental attitude.” – Thomas Jefferson “The earth belongs to the living, not to the dead.” – Thomas Jefferson The dead have no rights. Their involvement with this earth ends the moment they die. They cannot pass on anything to anyone else.

Special Pleading MB: “This inheritance tax is unfair to the middle and low income families. ... Also, what of family farms?” Inheritance is the fairest tax of all time. It’s fair to everyone. How can it be unfair to middle and low income families? Most of them wouldn’t pay it! Many idiots seem to think that the rich will be able to transfer their assets into trust funds and special accounts. They won’t! There won’t be a single loophole. Anyone seeking to break the law will receive long jail

sentences and have all of their assets confiscated by the State. No one will escape this tax.

Education “One good schoolmaster is of more use than a hundred priests.” – Thomas Paine Education, not religion, must be the bedrock of our world. The maximum damage to our world has been done by priests, pastors, vicars, reverends, ministers, rabbis, gurus, imams, popes and, above all, “holy” prophets (the unholiest people of all time).

A Cheque from Jesus Apparently, if you’re in a terrible financial plight, if you pray hard enough, you will receive a cheque in the post from Jesus. Does it have Jesus’ signature on it? Does it have heaven’s address? One must wonder what bank you cash it at. Goldman Sachs, no doubt, since its CEO does the “work of God.”

Father Figure What is the Abrahamic “God” if not the ultimate father figure to a child who believes his father is all-powerful? Abrahamism operates at the level of understanding of a four-year-old contemplating his “infallible” father.

The Christian Mantra The Promise of Salvation; the threat of Damnation; the Last Judgment. This is just Pavlovian conditioning. Make people eager to obey and terrified of disobeying. It’s the formula for absolute control.

Holy Murder The battle cry of the Crusaders of the First Crusade was, “God wills it!” When they slaughtered Muslim infidels, that’s what they yelled. Today, Muslims cry, “Allahu Akbar” (God is greatest) when they slaughter Christian infidels. Isn’t it horrific that so much murder is done in the name of “God”.

The Two Banners The Jesuits perform a spiritual meditation known as The Two Standards (Banners). Imagine two great armies facing each other across the battlefield of Armageddon, their respective banners fluttering in the breeze. One army is led by Jesus and the other by Satan (named “Lucifer” – the lightbearer – because he uses light to conceal his dark schemes!). Jesus and Lucifer are two voices delivering two radically opposed messages. Lucifer promotes wealth, renown, honour, status, wealth, power, admiration and pride, while Jesus advocates poverty, humiliation and humility. The Jesuits want to illustrate three crucial truths: a) We are engaged in a life and death struggle between light and dark, good and evil. b) Evil has immense resources. c) The strategies of the evil are clever, powerful and seductive, seeming to offer people exactly what they crave. Deep down, what do people really want? They want more than the next guy. If you have more, you are better, superior. You have higher status. Capitalism is about people trying to show others their superior status through the objects they possess. This lust for higher status is what separates us from our true self, from our neighbours and from God. It’s the root of all conflict. “Jesus” seeks to detach himself from possessions and thereby courts humiliation (being laughed at for being poor, pathetic and a “loser”, leading to humility). Via humility, a person can approach his true self, which is not concerned with others. Those driven by the need for status are defined by others, and are the prisoners of others since they are preoccupied with how they appear to others. Only a person who has found his true self can find God. So, the two standards are: 1) Lucifer: Riches and status – what I possess defines me.

2) Jesus: Poverty – I am free of possessions and unconcerned with what others think of me, thus allowing me to discover my true self. 1) Lucifer: Renown, Honour – the approval and recognition of others is what defines me. 2) Jesus: Humiliation – I am free from the need for validation by others. I don’t care if they despise me for not playing “the game”. 1) Lucifer: Pride – I am proud of how I think I look in the eyes of others; I crave their admiration, respect and their acknowledgement that I am superior. 2) Jesus: Humility – I have no need to look good to others. I define myself. I do not define myself according to their standards. Clearly, Wall Street and capitalism are the quintessence of the “Luciferian” (Satanic) outlook. We live in a world ruled by Satan, promoting the values of Satan, and many of the worst Satanists call themselves followers of Jesus!!!

Trust Funds Some people believe that it would easily be possible to get round 100% inheritance tax via trust funds. 100% inheritance tax means that all means of passing on assets to others are illegal. Self-evidently, a trust fund is illegal since it’s a direct transfer of wealth from one person to another person who has done nothing to earn it. All transfers of wealth are illegal in a meritocracy. You make your money and you spend it: you do not transfer it to your chosen ones.

Neo-Liberalism versus Progressive Capitalism Neo-Liberalism is anarcho-capitalist libertarianism. It calls for no State interference in the economy, hence no controls, regulations, supervision, constraints or laws. Everything is surrendered to “the market”. Progressive capitalism calls for control, regulation, constraints, supervision and laws – taming the market and making it serve the State and its people. Neo-liberalism panders to private interest. If capitalism is ever to work, it must serve the public interest.

Capitalists, inherently, are greedy, selfish, rapacious, self-interested, narcissistic, egotistical maniacs. It’s mad to let such people do whatever they like. Adam Smith’s doctrine that if everyone pursues relentless self-interest, it leads to the best outcomes for society, is as pernicious as any of the doctrines of Abrahamism. If everyone pursues relentless self-interest, what inevitably occurs is that some people are better at it than others, and are far more ruthless, cruel, unscrupulous, forceful, threatening and obsessive. These people – the psychopaths – progressively acquire vast amounts of wealth and power, and soon a few thousand of the most disgusting people on Earth own most of the Earth and its assets. Taken to its logical limit, one super-capitalist could own the whole world (which is the central thesis explored in The Last Bling King). Any system that possesses even a theoretical possibility of such an outcome is insane.

The Cause Causes are sacred. They transcend the individual and belong to the group. The Muslim 9/11 suicide hijackers gave their lives (and took the lives of thousands of innocent Americans) for Allah, Mohammed, the Koran and Islam. Imagine that the suicide hijackers had instead proclaimed that they were acting for the cause of “themselves”, i.e. to advance their own selfish interests. No one would have understood what that meant. You can’t be your own sacred cause. The pursuit of self-interest is taken for granted. There’s nothing noble and heroic about it. No sacrifice is involved if you’re just doing what you think is best for you (and fuck everyone else). The “I’m alright, Jack” cause isn’t a cause. “I’m looking after No.1” isn’t a cause. A cause must involve more than one person and be altruistic rather than selfish. Ayn Rand promoted the “virtue” of selfishness. That’s an oxymoron. What could ever be virtuousness about relentlessly pursuing your own selfinterest? Yet, astonishingly, free-market capitalism does make some claim to being a “cause”. Free-market capitalism says that the naked pursuit of self-interest is actually altruistic because it leads to better outcomes than anything else (allegedly) and raises general prosperity more than anything else (allegedly). Many people may be victims of capitalism, it is admitted, but it is also asserted that they would be even worse off without capitalism.

So, someone getting fifty cents a day for working 12-hour days in a Bangladesh sweatshop has an “enviable” job as far as a homeless beggar is concerned! Thus, capitalism actually tries to say that selfishness is the true basis of altruism! Talk about trying to have your cake and eat it. No one, bar Ayn Rand, has ever made any serious attempt to present rapacious capitalists as “heroes”. People don’t run around saying, “I’m going to fight to the death for my own selfish interests. I’m going to kill all the enemies of my self-interest. I have devoted my life to the sacred cause of my own self-interest.” Of course, capitalists never say these things either, but that’s what they believe and it’s what they dedicate their “soul” to. Nietzsche branded those who do nothing but seek petty advantages and personal comforts and security as “Last Men”. The Ignavi in Dante’s Inferno were the “neutrals” who refused to side with any cause until it was obvious who was winning (i.e. they had no ideological commitment and would support whoever won, thus maximizing their self-interest).

The Suicide of Jesus Christ The death (suicide?!) of Jesus Christ is a fascinating case study. We are told that he gave his life for “our sins”. Yet who was it who condemned us in the first place for “our sins”. Jesus Christ! So Jesus Christ died to save us from his own condemnation of us! Which is well and truly fucked up. The “cause” for which Jesus Christ gave his life was to free us from the sentence of hell that he himself passed on us. He gave his life to save us because he was the bastard who condemned us. He gave his life to save us from his own judgment and sentence on us. Of course, had he simply “forgiven” us and loved us, he would never have had to arrange his own death on a cross.

***** “The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis.” – Dante Alighieri

The Bomber

Boston bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev described his innocent victims as “collateral damage” in his reprisal for US military action in Afghanistan and Iraq. He said, “When you attack one Muslim, you attack all Muslims.” This is a perfect example of a “cause”. Note how one Muslim becomes all Muslims. If all Muslims were individuals and no collective identity could be accorded to them, Tsarnaev would have had no cause. That’s why it’s so important for religions to control what you wear, every detail of your appearance, what you eat and drink, how you pray each day, and so on. These all contribute to the collective identity – which is essential to any cause. Anything that disrupts uniformity disrupts a cause. To bring an end to religion, all of the means religions use to establish common religious identity must be attacked and outlawed.

What a Wonderful World “There is often a great deal of difference between the will of all and the general will; the latter considers only the common interest, while the former takes private interest into account, and is no more than a sum of particular wills: but take away from these same wills the pluses and minuses that cancel one another, and the general will remains as the sum of the differences.” – Jean-Jacques Rousseau The only valid economic, political and social systems are those that serve the general will. Free-market capitalism is devoted to the particular will, hence is unacceptable.

Descartes’ Malicious Demon Descartes conceived of a malicious demon intent on deceiving us as much as possible. The Matrix has been characterised as an example of the work of the malicious demon. But surely Abrahamism is his greatest work. The malicious demon is the Abrahamic God. Has anyone ever told more lies than the prophets of this God? Are there any texts more full of deceit than the Torah, Bible and Koran?

Thou Shalt Not Kill We are told that all religions promote peace and follow a divine Commandment of Thou Shalt Not Kill. Of course, this is nonsense. The Bible and Koran are full of death sentences for just about everything. What

religion actually says is that you should be peaceful towards all those slavishly worshipping your God and mindlessly obeying every Commandment, but you should be deadly towards everyone else. “Peace” is peace on God’s terms, not those of human beings. All heretics, apostates, infidels, and transgressors are to be killed. Religions have nothing to do with peace in any true sense. They are about religiously defined judicial murder. The two Muslim maniacs who hacked off a soldier’s head in the streets of London were being perfect Muslims, not “bad”. It’s Islam, and indeed all of Abrahamism, that’s the problem.

The Nazis “The masses are feminine and stupid. Only emotion and hatred can keep them under control.” – Adolf Hitler “We enter the Reichstag like wolves into the sheep pen.” – Joseph Goebbels

The Roman Republic The Roman Republic can be seen as a kind of Mafia State since it was ruled by ruthless, elite families, committed to nepotism, cronyism and privilege. The Roman Empire brought one family – the imperial family (initially that of Caesar) – to the fore.

***** The Old World Order who rule our world today are like the great patrician families of Rome, and treat the rest of us as “the mob” – the vulgar plebeians and proletarians.

Dr Stockmann, the Ultimate Fictional Hero Dr Stockmann is the protagonist of Ibsen’s incendiary play An Enemy of the People where he denounces both the authorities and the people themselves. In many ways, Dr Stockmann is a Nietzschean übermensch and he delivers one of the greatest analyses ever provided of the development of truth – in particular how it always originates with one person and then a small group, and is opposed by everyone else. As Schopenhauer said, “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed.

Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.” Being on the side of truth doesn’t make you popular, but it does make you right! Dr. Stockmann: I have already told you that what I want to speak about is the great discovery I have made lately – the discovery that all the sources of our moral life are poisoned and that the whole fabric of our civic community is founded on the pestiferous soil of falsehood. ... And so, with my eyes blinded to the real facts, I revelled in happiness. But yesterday morning – no, to be precise, it was yesterday afternoon – the eyes of my mind were opened wide, and the first thing I realised was the colossal stupidity of the authorities. Dr. Stockmann: It is a petty thing to catch me up on a word, Mr Aslaksen. What I mean is only that I got scent of the unbelievable piggishness our leading men had been responsible for down at the Baths. I can’t stand leading men at any price! – I have had enough of such people in my time. They are like billy-goats on a young plantation; they do mischief everywhere. They stand in a free man’s way, whichever way he turns, and what I should like best would be to see them exterminated like any other vermin. (Uproar.) Dr. Stockmann: Very well, gentlemen, I will say no more about our leading men. And if anyone imagines, from what I have just said, that my object is to attack these people this evening, he is wrong – absolutely wide of the mark. For I cherish the comforting conviction that these parasites – all these venerable relics of a dying school of thought – are most admirably paving the way for their own extinction; they need no doctor’s help to hasten their end. Nor is it folk of that kind who constitute the most pressing danger to the community. It is not they who are most instrumental in poisoning the sources of our moral life and infecting the ground on which we stand. It is not they who are the most dangerous enemies of truth and freedom amongst us. Dr. Stockmann: You may depend upon it – I shall name them! That is precisely the great discovery I made yesterday. (Raises his voice.) The most dangerous enemy of truth and freedom amongst us is the compact majority – yes, the damned compact Liberal majority – that is it! Now you know! Dr. Stockmann: Never Mr. Aslaksen! It is the majority in our community that denies me my freedom and seeks to prevent my speaking the truth.

Dr. Stockmann: The majority never has right on its side. Never, I say! That is one of these social lies against which an independent, intelligent man must wage war. Who is it that constitute the majority of the population in a country? Is it the clever folk, or the stupid? I don’t imagine you will dispute the fact that at present the stupid people are in an absolutely overwhelming majority all the world over. But, good Lord! – you can never pretend that it is right that the stupid folk should govern the clever ones. (Uproar and cries.) Oh, yes – you can shout me down, I know! But you cannot answer me. The majority has might on its side – unfortunately; but right it has not. I am in the right – I and a few other scattered individuals. The minority is always in the right. Dr. Stockmann: I have already said that I don’t intend to waste a word on the puny, narrow-chested, short-winded crew whom we are leaving astern. Pulsating life no longer concerns itself with them. I am thinking of the few, the scattered few amongst us, who have absorbed new and vigorous truths. Such men stand, as it were, at the outposts, so far ahead that the compact majority has not yet been able to come up with them; and there they are fighting for truths that are too newly-born into the world of consciousness to have any considerable number of people on their side as yet. Dr. Stockmann: Good heavens – of course I am, Mr Hovstad! I propose to raise a revolution against the lie that the majority has the monopoly of the truth. What sort of truths are they that the majority usually supports? They are truths that are of such advanced age that they are beginning to break up. And if a truth is as old as that, it is also in a fair way to become a lie, gentlemen. (Laughter and mocking cries.) Yes, believe me or not, as you like; but truths are by no means as long-lived at Methuselah – as some folk imagine. A normally constituted truth lives, let us say, as a rule seventeen or eighteen, or at most twenty years – seldom longer. But truths as aged as that are always worn frightfully thin, and nevertheless it is only then that the majority recognises them and recommends them to the community as wholesome moral nourishment. There is no great nutritive value in that sort of fare, I can assure you; and, as a doctor, I ought to know. These “majority truths” are like last year’s cured meat – like rancid, tainted ham; and they are the origin of the moral scurvy that is rampant in our communities. Dr. Stockmann: Have you gone clean out of your senses, Peter? I am sticking as closely to my subject as I can; for my subject is precisely this,

that it is the masses, the majority – this infernal compact majority – that poisons the sources of our moral life and infects the ground we stand on. Dr. Stockmann: Ah, my good Mr Hovstad, don’t talk nonsense about wellascertained truths! The truths of which the masses now approve are the very truths that the fighters at the outposts held to in the days of our grandfathers. We fighters at the outposts nowadays no longer approve of them; and I do not believe there is any other well-ascertained truth except this, that no community can live a healthy life if it is nourished only on such old marrowless truths. Dr. Stockmann: That is, the doctrine you have inherited from your forefathers and proclaim thoughtlessly far and wide – the doctrine that the public, the crowd, the masses, are the essential part of the population – that they constitute the People – that the common folk, the ignorant and incomplete element in the community, have the same right to pronounce judgment and to, approve, to direct and to govern, as the isolated, intellectually superior personalities in it. Dr. Stockmann (reflecting): No, confound it, you are right! – you have never had the courage to. Well, I won’t put you in a hole, Mr Hovstad. Let us say it is I that am the freethinker, then. I am going to prove to you, scientifically, that the People’s Messenger leads you by the nose in a shameful manner when it tells you that you – that the common people, the crowd, the masses, are the real essence of the People. That is only a newspaper lie, I tell you! The common people are nothing more than the raw material of which a People is made. (Groans, laughter and uproar.) Well, isn’t that the case? Isn’t there an enormous difference between a wellbred and an ill-bred strain of animals? Take, for instance, a common barndoor hen. What sort of eating do you get from a shrivelled up old scrag of a fowl like that? Not much, do you! And what sort of eggs does it lay? A fairly good crow or a raven can lay pretty nearly as good an egg. But take a well-bred Spanish or Japanese hen, or a good pheasant or a turkey – then you will see the difference. Or take the case of dogs, with whom we humans are on such intimate terms. Think first of an ordinary common cur – I mean one of the horrible, coarse-haired, low-bred curs that do nothing but run about the streets and befoul the walls of the houses. Compare one of these curs with a poodle whose sires for many generations have been bred in a gentleman’s house, where they have had the best of food and had the

opportunity of hearing soft voices and music. Do you not think that the poodle’s brain is developed to quite a different degree from that of the cur? Of course it is. It is puppies of well-bred poodles like that, that showmen train to do incredibly clever tricks – things that a common cur could never learn to do even if it stood on its head. (Uproar and mocking cries.) Dr. Stockmann: The kind of common people I mean are not only to be found low down in the social scale; they crawl and swarm all around us – even in the highest social positions. You have only to look at your own fine, distinguished Mayor! Dr. Stockmann: Lack of oxygen weakens the conscience. And there must be a plentiful lack of oxygen in very many houses in this town, I should think, judging from the fact that the whole compact majority can be unconscientious enough to wish to build the town’s prosperity on a quagmire of falsehood and deceit. Dr. Stockmann (with growing fervour): What does the destruction of a community matter, if it lives on lies? It ought to be razed to the ground. I tell you – All who live by lies ought to be exterminated like vermin! You will end by infecting the whole country; you will bring about such a state of things that the whole country will deserve to be ruined. And if things come to that pass, I shall say from the bottom of my heart: Let the whole country perish, let all these people be exterminated! The whole crowd. (shouting): Yes, yes! He is an enemy of the people! He hates his country! He hates his own people! Dr. Stockmann: I have done my duty. Dr. Stockmann: I shall conceal nothing. Dr. Stockmann: No back ways for me, Katherine, (Raising his voice.) You will hear more of this enemy of the people, before he shakes the dust off his shoes upon you! I am not so forgiving as a certain Person; I do not say: “I forgive you, for ye know not what ye do.” Dr. Stockmann: I have no right! There is only one single thing in the world a free man has no right to do. Do you know what that is? Of course you don’t, but I will tell you. A free man has no right to soil himself with filth;

he has no right to behave in a way that would justify his spitting in his own face. Dr. Stockmann: Well, look here – I will explain! It is the party leaders that must be exterminated. A party leader is like a wolf, you see – like a voracious wolf. He requires a certain number of smaller victims to prey upon every year, if he is to live. Just look at Hovstad and Aslaksen! How many smaller victims have they not put an end to – or at any rate maimed and mangled until they are fit for nothing except to be householders or subscribers to the People’s Messenger! (Sits down on the edge of the table.) Come here, Katherine – look how beautifully the sun shines to-day! And this lovely spring air I am drinking in! Dr. Stockmann: Then you shall drive all the wolves out of the country, my boys! Dr. Stockmann: Yes, and I will go so far as to say that now I am the strongest man in the whole world. Dr. Stockmann: Yes. (Gathers family round him, and says confidentially:) It is this, let me tell you – that the strongest man in the world is he who stands most alone.

***** Religion is the perfect example of the masses clinging to ancient “truths” that have long since been comprehensively refuted. The masses are the last to absorb new truths. Only a very special type of human being is well attuned to the truth. The scientists of today, like the religious hordes throughout history, refuse to accept new truths and new perspectives. They have become the “masses” too, who simply won’t countenance changing their mindset. The truth is the hardest thing there is, and only the highest human beings have developed an organ or truth – hyperrationalism. As Dr Stockmann says, the strongest people in the world are those who can stand by new truths in the face of the opposition of the whole world. Each new truth originates in the mind of just one person, the first person to see and recognise it. The world never thanks him. The world hates change. Above all, it hates having to change its “truths” – and religion demonstrates that many people won’t change their “truths” no matter what. Which makes

them the countless legions of lies and liars, the fodder for the false prophets and false gods.

***** “Faith is what I will die for; dogma is what I will kill for.” – unattributed The masses are much more dogmatic than they are faithful. There are many killer and few martyrs.

The Moral Climate Who sets the moral climate? Who instigates moral panics? Who’s controlling the agenda? Cui bono?

***** THE COURT OF HELL. THE COURT OF HEAVEN. To which court do you belong? Who is the Judge in your court – God or the Devil?

The War Wall Street Elite versus Main Street. Which side are you on?

***** The Old World Order = the world of nepotism, privilege, cronyism, and inheritance. The No World Order = the world of anarchy, libertarianism, “love and light”, “unconditional love”, “anything goes” ... the jungle. The New World Order = the world of merit, equal opportunities, fairness, justice, and reason. So, what’s it to be?

*****

Why is that the “love brigade” never refer to “reason and light”, to “unconditional reason”? Why do people think that love is superior to reason? We have had a world of “love” from the dawn of time. It hasn’t worked. In fact, it has done nothing but generate hate and evil. “Love” is exactly what underpins the tyranny of the individual, of the family, of nepotism, privilege, cronyism and religious fanaticism. A world of reason would be a much more loving world than a world of “love”!

The Truth Why is the truth so elusive, so hard to find? It’s because how you approach the truth is a matter of your psychological type. Feeling types approach the truth emotionally, and, of course, an emotion is not something stable and objective, something with which others will definitely agree. We don’t all have the same emotional responses, hence this is no way to determine any kind of general truth. Emotional people follow “story logic” because stories are imbued with emotions and reflect the standard ways in which people interact socially, i.e. we meet in a bar and swap gossip, stories, jokes and so on. Virtually no one discusses mathematical, scientific and philosophical proofs in a bar! You’d be deemed wholly anti-social and autistic. Our world is a world of stories because that’s the easiest way to communicate, the easiest information to understand and the information in which we have the most emotional investment. With stories, we can all be inspired, disgusted, fascinated, enthralled, delighted, and so on. It’s no surprise to find that the Bible – the most successful book in history – is a book of stories, none of which make any rational sense, but make plenty of simplistic, emotional sense. If you approach the Bible emotionally (with “story logic”) rather than rationally (with actual logic), you find it infinitely more persuasive. Religion for most people is about their emotional relationship with the being they imagine created the world, and is very similar to the emotional notes struck by children contemplating their parents, and especially their father (in patriarchal religions). A religion is immediately improved as soon as it adopts the Taoist yin and yang approach. Abrahamism would be transformed if it became ditheistic rather than monotheistic ... if it acknowledged a female divinity in partnership with a male divinity. We’ve said it before and we’ll say it again –

monotheism is the worst idea in the whole of human history, and we have the “Jews” to thank for that catastrophe. The stories of the Bible would be wholly different if a female were involved in the decision-making. Look at the difference between Greek myths and legends and Jewish Bible stories. In Greek religion, Zeus and Hera behave like the squabbling marriage partners they are. There’s plenty of marital conflict in Greek religion, but no psychopathy, no extremism, fanaticism or persecution – there’s no Jewish psychosis. In Greek religion, the gods form a Council and there’s a balance between them all. In Jewish religion, there’s no balance – only one maniac who can do anything he likes. Monotheism is inherently imbalanced and dangerous – as it has proved so conclusively and horrifically over the millennia. Monotheism, deep down, is the belief that a family should be wholly defined by the father, and the mother and children must obey him without question. All monotheistic religions are patriarchal. A “Council of Gods” reflects, in family terms, the notion of all members of the family having a say and sitting round to discuss things, rather than having one dictator barking out orders. Religion, when you clear away all the baggage, is simply about the family and who should hold the power in the family. Fathers are deeply attracted to monotheism (based on a patriarchal God), and so are childlike adults who remain stuck in the world of infants who believe their father can do no wrong and is perfect (God, in fact!). For any religion to be healthy, it must be based on the idea of the Council, of the balance of power, of the whole family having a say. Monotheism is the opposite of what is required. It’s as psychologically damaging as it’s possible to get. It should be banned by any rational State. Sensing types approach the “truth” in terms of their observations and sensory experiences. They simply can’t conceive of a truth beyond the sensory world. They can’t imagine “dimensionless” existence that would yield no sensory traces whatsoever. All scientific materialists are of this type. They can’t escape their sensory bias, just as feeling types can’t escape their emotional bias. Where feeling types approach religion in terms of relationships, sensing types do so in terms of “evidence”. Doubting Thomas was a sensing type because he needed to see before he could believe in Jesus’ resurrection, and the others were feeling types because what mattered to them was their relationship with Jesus and their feelings towards him.

Intuitive types come to religion via their powerful intuitions. They don’t care about their feelings, nor what their senses tell them. They get a kind of mystical vision of the world beyond, and it’s as real to them as the sensory world is to sensing types. They have no difficulty with dimensionless existence if it’s consistent with their intuitions. Finally, thinking types approach religion rationally. Religion either makes sense rationally or it doesn’t. If it can’t be rationally defended then it must be rejected. Thinking sensing types (scientists) can’t see how religion could ever be true – because it relies on a dimensionless, noumenal domain beyond space and time – so dismiss it as nonsense and superstition. Thinking intuitive types have no such difficulties. All thinking intuitives – rationalists – eventually arrive at the eternal truths of reason. What is true must always have been true and can never be false. What are the “truths of feeling”? They are true only as long as the particular feelings last. What is the truth of faith when you have lost your faith, when your feelings towards what you once regarded as certain have irrevocably changed? What are the “truths of the senses”? We know for a fact that we can’t see microwaves or radio waves or infra-red waves or ultra-violet waves or xrays or gamma rays. What else can’t we see? Why should what is real and true be in any way dependent on how the human senses have evolved (through random mutation and natural selection, as we are told by the Darwinists)? There is no sufficient reason at all why all that exists must be amenable to our senses and must be material and dimensional. What are the “truths of intuition”? No matter how good our intuitions are, we can’t prove them. They have no logical necessity. Hinduism, Buddhism, and Taoism are highly intuitive and they contain many valuable insights, yet they are also full of mystical claptrap. How do you separate the true gold from the fools’ gold? Slowly but surely we come to realise that unarguable, incontestable, absolute truth resides in only one place: the tautologies and analytic definitions of mathematics. Everything about mathematics is true then, now and forever. None of it can ever not be true. Mathematics is the only eternal thing. It has no rivals. “God” could be eternal only if he were mathematical. Truth – eternal truth, absolute truth – is mathematics and nothing besides. Mathematics defines existence and mathematics is existence. No

one invented mathematics. It’s impossible for any temporal being to invent something eternal. We exist purely because the properties of mathematics permit our existence. There is no other reason why we are. We can’t not exist. Mathematics has made us inevitable. Why is there “something” rather than “nothing”. Purely because, mathematically, something and nothing are ultimately the same thing. There’s nowhere else to go other than mathematics. All paths to truth lead to mathematics. All other paths are the roads to fantasy, delusion, madness and unreason. The truth is for those people who can think rationally. It’s not for anyone else. It’s not for people of feelings or the senses. It’s for intuitives only if they have allied their intuitions to reason. Forget faith, forget science, forget mysticism. Rationalism is the only way to the truth, and rationalism is simply the study of mathematics and the eternal truths of mathematical reason.

Islamic Scholars Is “Islamic scholar” the supreme oxymoron? What do these “scholars” do? Do they painstakingly analyze every line of the Koran and expose it as a manmade concoction? No, they assume from the get-go that every line is attributable to Allah. So, from the outset, they are fanatically partisan, devoted to “proving” that this is the Word of God, and blind to ever finding any flaws. They are not “scholars”, they are propagandists. They are advocates, not critics. They are believers, not disinterested, impartial intellectuals and academics. There are no Islamic scholars. All they do is interpret lines of the Koran in ways that suit their own Islamic agendas. No “scholar” of the Koran has ever reached the conclusion that it is fallacious and deceitful. That’s not because it isn’t, but because no one dares to reach that conclusion. The Christian Bible has been minutely dissected and countless scholars have lost their faith once they have studied it and seen how absurd it is. The Koran would suffer exactly the same fate if its Muslim scholars approached it as scholars rather than as faithful Muslims. Any true scholarship applied to the Koran (always by non-Muslims) invariably shows that an Arab tribesman stole the Jewish Bible wholesale and rewrote it for Arabs, simply replacing Abraham, Sarah and Isaac (the Jews), with Abraham, Hagar and Ishmael (the Arabs).

Whom Can You Believe? So, who entered the tomb of Jesus first, following his resurrection? There’s a different answer for each of the four gospels: 1) John: Peter entered the tomb of Jesus first (John 20:6). The beloved disciple followed Peter in. 2) Luke: The women from Galilee entered the tomb first (Luke 24:3). When told the tomb was empty, Peter ran to the tomb, looked inside, and saw that it was indeed empty. 3) Mark: Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James and Salome entered the tomb first (Mark 16:5) although it also says there was already a young man inside the tomb. None of the disciples went to the tomb. 4) Matthew: Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to the tomb but did not enter it, going away to tell the disciples what the angel had said (Matthew 28:1). How can anyone take the gospels seriously when they can’t agree on something as basic as this? It’s not exactly a difficult question. How come mysterious figures appear in some versions but not others. You’d almost imagine that the whole thing was a work of fiction, with four different novelists trying to outdo each other!

King Henry VIII King Henry VIII of England, intent on marrying his mistress Ann Boleyn, appealed to the Pope to allow him a divorce from Catherine of Aragon. No divorce was granted, so, instead, Henry divorced the Pope (!), and England broke from Catholicism. Henry replaced the Pope as head of the Church in England, and thus the “Church of England” was born, with a monarch rather than cleric as its spiritual leader. Henry VIII is famous for the dissolution of England’s monasteries. Isn’t it time to dissolve all of the mainstream places of worship?

Style “Style is knowing who you are, what you want to say and not giving a damn.” – Gore Vidal

Do you have style?

Original Sin The Original Sin was Jewish Monotheism – belief in a Creator. All people who believe in this Original Sin perpetuate Original Sin and are the people of Original Sin: the damned! Without these people, there would be no Original Sin and humanity would be free at last.

Self-Esteem A person with low self-esteem focuses on what they believe others will think is wrong with them. A person with high self-esteem focuses on what they believe others will think is right with them. A person with low self-esteem focuses on what they think will cause others to find them ugly, flawed, in error, pathetic, undesirable, and thus to reject them. A person with high self-esteem focuses on what they think will cause others to find them attractive, seductive, fascinating, charming, and desirable, and thus embrace them. People of low self-esteem find so many problems with themselves that they often want to self-harm. People of high self-esteem find so many things right with themselves that they often become narcissists. Each group is as bad as each other – pathological – but the narcissists have much happier lives than the self-harmers. The smart person neither exaggerates his flaws nor blinds himself to them. He embraces them as the totality of what he is. He is confident about himself, “warts and all”. Nothing is more seductive than confidence.

The Cure In the past, and even in the present day, some psychiatrists have thought it possible to “cure” homosexuality. Of course, this automatically tells us that a judgment has been made that homosexuality is wrong, a problem, a disease, or whatever.

Why is it that no psychiatrist has ever sought a cure for Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Karmism or even scientific materialism? Is the Abrahamic willingness to murder offspring (if a voice in the head identifying itself as “God” orders it) to be regarded as psychiatrically healthy? Homosexuality might not be everyone’s cup of tea, but it surely can’t be treated on a par with a pathological, psychotic condition such as Abrahamism. It shows what a mad world we live in that Abrahamic would-be childmurderers (because that’s what all Abrahamists are if they accept that Abraham did the right thing by being prepared to make a human sacrifice of his own son) are deemed healthy and sane. All Abrahamists are fundamentally disturbed, deranged and dangerous to others – as they have proved countless times throughout history.

One World Government MS: “I agree with the Illuminati on everything but a ‘One World Government.’ Therein lies a bone of contention. How will this leader be picked, how will he rule and for how long, what purpose will currency serve if there is no competition, and who will balance this despot’s power??? Explain this to me.” In fact, the Illuminati want a global confederation of essentially autonomous city states. The city state will replace the nation state as the basic political unit, as was the case in ancient Greece – the birthplace of Western civilisation. However, it’s desirable for a group to have an oversight of the whole of humanity – and this will be the One World Government. It won’t be a Government in the strict sense since it won’t be charged with running city-states, which are the functional political units of the world. It will, however, coordinate any required global initiatives. In Star Trek, Earth is ruled by a One World Government, and Earth belongs to a Galactic Federation. The Meritocratic One World Government will be elected by the meritocratic representatives of the city states. Anyone is eligible to be part of the One World Government – if they have the right skills set. They will be elected by fellow meritocrats, i.e. meritocratic election constitutes the criterion of who has the best fit to the required skills set.

There won’t be any “despot”. In fact, the One World Government will resemble a kind of global Supreme Court and Advisory Panel, taking an overview of what is in the best interests of all the city states. It will not be the puppet of a hyperpower nation state such as America. Nation states will no longer exist in the old sense. As for currency, this is a matter for individual city states, although some sort of secondary global currency may be required to facilitate trade, commerce and movement between city states. It will be up to expert economists to devise any such system.

***** MS: “Don’t you think these super rich guys are going to drag us all into Armageddon just to have the ‘last word.’ I’m just saying before we get illumination we are going to get burnt real bad.” Yes, that’s certainly possible. However, the super rich may prove to be Wizards of Oz – sheep in wolves’ clothing. They rule via bluster, smoke and mirrors. It’s an illusion, a bluff, a con. When they are exposed for what they are – when they know they can no longer fool the people – they will simply fade away. Like the Wizard of Oz himself, they will get in their balloon and head off to somewhere else. Can a few fat old men stand against the world? Never forget the French Revolution. If the elite play dirty, they, and all their fellow travellers, can fully expect to be exterminated. This time, the power and influence of the Old World Order will be broken once and for all. In Guantanamo Bay, prisoners are subject to “forcible cell extractions”. In the New World Order, the super rich can expect much worse than Guantanamo Bay treatment if they resist the will of the people. What is the greatest problem of our world? It’s that the super rich elite have no fear at all of the people, hence believe they can get away with anything, as with masters and their slaves. The elite ought to be terrified of the people, exactly as they were in France in 1789 and Russia in 1917.

Profanity JF: “How can you claim illumination but be so profane about the truth of the scriptures?”

How can you be so dumb? The “scriptures” have zero truth content. In fact, almost everything has zero truth content. Ontological mathematics alone delivers truth. We have no respect for people’s beliefs. We have no respect for their holy texts, their prophets or their gods. Why should we? Why should we revere lies, liars, madmen and maniacs? We don’t revere ancient texts unless they’re by humanity’s greatest thinkers – such as Pythagoras. Moses, Jesus Christ and Mohammed do not qualify as eminent thinkers. They have not advanced human knowledge at all! There are many idiots who think the people of the past had higher wisdom than those of the present. This is absurd and shows contempt for all advances in mathematics, science, philosophy, psychology and technology that have happened since ancient times. That said, the average ancient Greek was much smarter than the average Abrahamist, Karmist or New Ager – all those who are still locked into an ancient, primitive mindset of faith, feelings and Mythos. Muslims haven’t learned a single thing in the last 1400 years! That’s a fact.

Afghanistan Can any sane person doubt that Afghanistan will descend into chaos as soon as the Western forces depart? The Taliban will resume control in the south and resume the civil war against the northern warlords. What an utter waste of time!

The Harvest The Harvest Time is Coming! It’s time to separate the HyperHumans from the sheeple. Where do you stand? Are you a believer or a knower? Are you “Mythos” (you believe in absurd ancient stories of wandering Jews and Arabs and ludicrous conspiracies about alien lizards) or “Logos” (you are a hyperrationalist)? Are you on your knees to “God” or are you making yourself God? Knowledge is power and absolute power is absolute knowledge of the true workings of reality. Mathematics – living mathematics – is the answer

to everything. Intuitively, everyone understands this to be the case. Illuminism is the proof. What is the human soul? It’s the basic unit (the monad) of living mathematics. A soul is simply a self-contained, autonomous mathematical information system defined by the generalised Euler Formula and thus encoded with the full laws of ontological mathematics. It’s a mental entity, a living entity, a subject that can experience, interpret, process and generate information. There is nothing bizarre about it. It’s pure math. It’s not created by anyone and it’s not caused by anyone. It’s an eternal, uncreated, uncaused, indestructible unit of existence.

***** A Wonderful World – No Christians, no Jews, no Muslims, no Karmists, no Scientific Materialists, no Conspiracy Theorists, no Anarcho-capitalist Libertarians, no irrational “rationalists” (the self-styled “skeptics”), no super rich. Replaced by HyperHumanity, HyperConsciousness, HyperReason, HyperReality, HyperMeritocracy and HyperMathematics (the true final theory of everything). It’s time for the New World Order, for the advent of the Coming Race. The Harvest Time is approaching.

The Heroic Mistake “The real hero is always a hero by mistake; he dreams of being an honest coward like everyone else.” – Umberto Eco

Saint Paul The Syrians claim that they invented Christianity because St Paul (Saul of Tarsus) – the man who gave birth to the Christian religion – became a follower of Jesus Christ on the road to Damascus, the capital of Syria. It was by breathing the air of Syria and feeling the land of Syria under his feet that Paul was converted!

The Alphas Humanity is obsessed with winners, the successful, the influential, the powerful, the rich, the famous. That’s why human history has revolved around gods, kings, dictators, generals, elite figures, celebrities – all of the “alphas”.

Not So Bad “Is there a modern version of hell that avoids the medieval image of demons thrusting the souls of the damned into hellfire? Indeed there is. In Catholic circles, hell is defined as an eternity spent in the absence of God.” – Clifford Longley WTF! What about Dante’s Inferno? If Catholicism has changed its medieval teachings on the fires of hell and the demons that tend them then it was lying then, hence is the Church of the Antichrist. So, which is it? As for spending eternity in the absence of the Abrahamic God, what could be more divine? It would be hell to be forced to spend any time in his company!

The Fallible Pope “The Lord has redeemed all of us, all of us, with the Blood of Christ: all of us, not just Catholics. Everyone! ... Even the atheists. Everyone!” – Pope Francis “They cannot be saved who, knowing the Church as founded by Christ and necessary for salvation, would refuse to enter her or remain in her.” – Vatican spokesman Father Thomas Rosica, “clarifying” the Pope’s remarks, i.e. being “good” and “moral” is simply not enough to avoid going to hell. You must be a paid-up Catholic, or you’re damned. Shouldn’t the Pope, when he meets the likes of the non-Catholic Queen of England or President of the United States, tell them to their faces that they’re going to hell? If he doesn’t, what kind of hypocrite is he?

***** “Atheists, according to Christians, are going to hell unless we accept Christ’s divinity.” – Atheist Hemant Mehta “Atheists go to heaven? Nope. Sorry world, infallible pope got it wrong. Vatican steps in with alacrity.” – Richard Dawkins “He who doesn’t pray to the Lord prays to the Devil.” – Pope Francis

(So, atheists, who don’t pray to the “Lord”, are by default in the camp of those who pray to the Devil, hence are going to hell, contradicting Pope Francis’s statement that Christ has “redeemed” atheists. What the Pope actually meant, of course, was that atheists can be redeemed whenever they like as long as they convert to Catholicism, which is no kind of “positive” message to atheists and thus is deceitful and casuistic – the Pope, not surprisingly, was trained as a Jesuit, the masters of Catholic spin, the Vatican’s spin doctors.) “Atheists or followers of other faiths, may be regarded as anonymous Christians. They have the right values but the wrong beliefs. On dying, they may receive God’s mercy.” – Jesuit theologian Karl Rahner WTF! Why aren’t decent Catholics “anonymous atheists”. – they have the right values but wrong beliefs!

The Dinner Date from Hell “Going out to dinner with someone from Goldman Sachs is like going out to dinner with a serial killer.” – anonymous

The Imposters “I feel like a total fraud. It’s called the imposter syndrome. It’s almost like the better I do, the more my feeling of inadequacy actually increases. I’m just going, ‘Any moment, someone’s going to find out I’m a total fraud and that I don’t deserve any of what I’ve achieved.’” – Emma Watson (Hermione in the Harry Potter series) Well, you are a fraud, Emma. You were simply a person who was chosen for an acting role. Countless others could have got the part and done it just as well. Why are you so wealthy? Talent? You must be joking. You’re just lucky. Most “successful” people are lucky. The truly talented are the geniuses. Any number of girls could have played Hermione. How many girls could win two Nobel Prizes, as Marie Curie did? Marie Curie was no imposter. Her talent was no fraud. She didn’t rely on luck. She worked incredibly hard and fully deserves her remarkable place in history.

People are Strange

We often get rather strange people commenting on our work. Here’s an example: OX: “The issue about the creator god is not of much importance. It is a philosophical issue where Plato for example believed in a creator god of everything while Heraclitus saw it from a different angle. The important issue about this whole biz is that the goal for the illuminated one is to become a master mason and a creator god within the limits of a hierarchical structure that is under (or/and above) of real divinities and this is the tricky issue and the most tricky issue is that there is always someone who sits in the centre of the circle like for example Solomon and Pythagoras.” This is more or less the ramblings of a nutcase. No point has been made, no argument has been advanced. The question of whether or not there is a Creator is in fact the most important of all. If there’s a Creator then he holds the answers to our existence. Moreover, since he created us, he can also annihilate us or send us to hell if we displease him. If there’s no Creator then we are eternal. No one can annihilate us, no one can send us to hell, and there is no one we can go to for the answer to existence. We have to discover it for ourselves. Also, the claim that Plato believed in a Creator God who made everything shows that the person knows nothing about Plato’s philosophy. Plato’s system revolves around a transcendent domain of perfect, immutable, eternal Forms, the highest of which is known as “The Good”. No one created these Forms, hence there is no Creator in the Abrahamic sense. There is, for Plato, a being called the Demiurge who makes use of the Forms to create the material world. This Demiurge has no power over the Forms and could not exist if they did not first exist. In other words, the Demiurge is a creation of the Forms. He partakes of the Form of Life, and if this did not exist, neither would he. It’s infuriating when these self-inflated, self-important, selfaggrandizing, ignorant Narcissists have the impudence to comment on our work, which is far beyond their understanding and knowledge. There are countless fools in the world who imagine they know something. If you want to learn, you must first acknowledge your own ignorance, as Socrates did, and then you can build from there, with humility, and by respecting those people who know infinitely more than you. Don’t delude yourself that you’re an “expert” when you plainly aren’t. Becoming smart, well-informed

and knowledgeable isn’t something you achieve by reading a book or two. It requires an immense effort, way beyond what most people are remotely capable of. If you’re a real expert, you’ll know it, and you’ll bear the “scars” of all the toil you’ve put in to get there. What you won’t be is someone posting rambling nonsense on Facebook pages where you are not wanted and no one asked for your opinion. We get loads of these “esotericists” who think we are wrong because we dismiss their infantile, primitive superstitions, which are almost as bad as those of the Abrahamists. OX knows nothing about Pythagoras or Solomon, but imagines himself an expert. What a clown. What an embarrassment.

The Mad Religions If someone appeared in the present day and said he’d encountered the Angel Gabriel in a cave and had the Word of God dictated to him even though he was illiterate, he would be sectioned and placed in a mental asylum. Yet because this happened with Mohammed 1,400 years ago, he has 1.5 billion followers in today’s world! These people are all as insane as he was. Mohammed wasn’t a prophet. He was a lunatic who heard voices. There’s no mystery about it. The mystery is why people today believe in this lunatic. Yet it’s not a mystery. It’s what brainwashing and lack of reason accomplish.

Why Are People So Dumb? In response to our statement that scientific materialism is the denial that anyone is free, AH said “Ehhh, no it’s not.” So, AH is apparently the genius who can explain how freedom appears within the laws of science – which contain no element of freedom whatsoever. This is a challenge that has defied all of humanity’s greatest thinkers, and of course has no solution within the prevailing scientific paradigm. Of course, AH doesn’t actually provide the answer. All he does is scoff at others. People such as AH know nothing about anything. Their ignorance is so vast that they can’t conceive how little they know and they actually imagine they know something. They have the impertinence to post one-line mockeries of our position without offering a single justification of their stance. That’s what the world has become – an arena for sniping

halfwits to express their vacuous opinions. The internet has made “Gods” of the biggest fools on earth. They suddenly have a voice. They can roam the internet, leaving their retarded droppings everywhere. The cockroaches have learned how to tweet!

The Truth of Religion “Most men would kill truth if truth would kill their religion.” – Lamuel Washburn To many people, truth is the most unwelcome visitor they could possibly get.

Not Getting It RA: “Can you prove mathematics? What is the empirical basis of mathematics?” We say over and over again that mathematics is the quintessential basis of rationalism. The laws of mathematics are eternal, immutable, deductive, necessary, a priori and analytic. They have absolutely nothing to do with empiricism – apart from establishing the entire context within which empiricism is even possible. Many people simply don’t understand the difference between proof and evidence. Evidence never proves anything! Proof is all about analytic rationalist statements, about truths of reason. Evidence is about synthetic empiricist statements, about “truths” of fact. No amount of facts and evidence can ever prove anything. We might see a trillion white swans but at no time can we eliminate the possibility of a black swan, so we can never prove that all swans are white. Simply to assert the “evidence” that only white swans have ever been observed does not guarantee that a swan of a different colour will not appear – and indeed black swans were discovered in Australia. Nietzsche said, “There are no facts, only interpretations.” A “fact” isn’t a proof of anything. “Evidence” isn’t proof of anything. They are simply raw material for interpretation. Proofs involve analytic statements such as 1 + 1 = 2. This is true forever. No experiments are required and no interpretations are required. 1 + 1 = 2 isn’t a “fact”. It’s a definition, a tautology.

It is impossible to explain the universe without recourse to necessary truths. You can’t have a free-floating world of pure contingency, grounded in no eternal laws. Mathematics is the subject of eternal laws that transcends all human experience and is accessible to reason alone.

Protestants MF: “Aren’t you lumping all the Protestants into the same generalization too much?” There are many thousands of Protestant sects. We would be here forever if we referred specifically to each sect and elaborated on all the differences between them. Sorry, we have better ways to spend our time than trying to satisfy MF’s pedantry and inability to understand general points. MF: “Your rant completely loses sight of the fact that within Protestantism you have liberal progressive churches that ordain women and openly gay pastors.” Anyone can call themselves Christian. Whether they have any connection at all with historical Christianity is a different matter. In terms of Christian history, you are not a Christian if you endorse female or gay priests (and far more Protestant Churches are anti-gay, illiberal and conservative than progay, liberal and progressive). In the modern age of secularism, humanism, liberalism and New Age thinking, many people use “Christ” as a symbol of “light and love”. They ignore almost everything Jesus Christ is reported to have said. At no stage in the New Testament does Jesus Christ endorse homosexuality or a female priesthood. Moreover, he fully endorses the Old Testament in which the penalty for homosexuality was death, and the idea of a female priest was unthinkable. To refer to “liberal” Protestants is absurd. Such people have nothing to do with historical Protestantism, which was much given to burning witches, Catholics, heretics and more or less anyone the Protestants didn’t like. MF: “Also, not all Protestants share the same history with the Calvinists, from whom the famous ‘work ethic’ came.” Oh, and which Protestant sects say that you shouldn’t work hard and earn as much money as possible? Which Protestant sects condemn capitalism, privilege and inheritance?

MF: “Moreover, I think an argument can be made that the Anglican/ Episcopalian Church is really ‘Catholic-lite’ and does not have the same issues with the Vatican as the Lutherans do.” The Anglican Church has historically always had a quasi-Catholic wing (the High Church) and an opposite evangelical wing (Low Church). The presence of the latter has ensured that the Anglican Church has never had good relations with the Vatican. MF: “But those groups whom you decry are only one of many different groups within Protestantism which also includes Quakers, Mennonites, Amish, liberal Methodists.” What?! Are the Quakers, Mennonites, Amish and Methodists “liberals”? God help us! MF: “Protestants formed some of the great peace movements as well as the abolition of slavery movement, the women’s suffrage movement, the civil rights movement (remember Martin Luther King Jr.) etc.” Martin Luther King Jr. was black. How many WASPs helped him? Who were the prime movers in the slave trade? – WASPs. The racist Confederacy was overwhelmingly Protestant. The KKK are Protestants. Who opposed female suffrage? – the WASP elite. Who opposed civil and human rights? – the WASP elite. It’s obscene that people try to muddy the waters concerning Protestantism by citing minority Protestant movements while ignoring the broad thrust of Protestantism. Anyone who has any historical understanding can be in no doubt about what Protestantism has stood for since Martin Luther broke with Rome. It’s always revealing when people try to focus on side-issues rather than accept the main point. We get this all the time too with advocates of different versions of Buddhism and Hinduism. We couldn’t care less about the slender theological differences between different groups. In Gulliver’s Travels, Jonathan Swift satirized two rival factions (based on Catholics and Protestants) that loathed each other because one group opened their boiled eggs from the big end while the others always chose the little end. We’re not interested in the small details but in the Big Picture. It would be impossible to advance any argument at all if every individual nuance of the argument were to be addressed. There are

estimated to be 41,000 Protestants sects. Only a madman would think we’d refer to every one of those just so that some jerk can’t get off on attacking our general point.

Dangerous Knowledge MS: “It is brainwashing because like the Moth and candle theory, man’s mind is attracted to information and my mind is interested in what you have to say but I can tell it is flammable.” MS says that anything interesting constitutes brainwashing. He plainly has a limited understanding of the concept of brainwashing. The essence of brainwashing is to turn you against yourself, against your natural inclinations or what’s in your best interests. You cannot be brainwashed by something that you yourself have sought in order to fulfil your own inner nature and desires. If you find it very persuasive, it’s because you agree with it, not because someone has operantly conditioned you to agree with it. Christians are brainwashed to despise masturbation because “God” regards it as a sin. Muslims are brainwashed to pray five times a day for fear of going to hell, or to grow a beard because they will be eternally punished if they don’t. The idea that we brainwash people by writing interesting material is laughable. By that criterion, every interesting person on earth is a malevolent brainwasher, cruelly entrapping and manipulating people by the “evil” tactic of having good, stimulating ideas. Many people go through life with staggeringly wrong-headed concepts in their minds, and a simple failure to understand basic terms.

The Madmen We said: “The most depraved and immoral ‘God’ to which humanity has been subjected is the God of Abraham, the deity worshipped by billions of Christians, Muslims and Jews. The defining event of Abraham’s life, which is celebrated by all Abrahamists, is that God ordered him to kill his son and he willingly agreed. This consent to murder is, perversely and criminally, regarded as something great and wondrous by Abrahamists when in fact it

should be defined as the ultimate immorality and evil. If killing your own innocent boy is ‘good’ then what on earth constitutes ‘evil’? If Abrahamists don’t hesitate to kill their own children, they certainly won’t hesitate to kill yours – as history has so horrifically demonstrated. Is it conceivable that the True God would order a father to make a human sacrifice of his own son, an act of irredeemable moral evil? Would any loving, moral father contemplate doing it for even one instant – or would he give his own life to save his son’s?” Some replies: JÀV: “It was a test of faith. Later, God stayed his hand, so please don’t stir. I love your page but...” What does this statement mean? The question is very simple – did or did not Abraham intend to murder his son because a voice in his head told him to? The answer is unambiguously yes. Where, exactly, does faith enter into this? Faith that “God” would prevent him from doing it? Faith that taking his innocent boy’s life because of God’s order would somehow be for the good? All of these “faith” people should state precisely in what Abraham was exhibiting faith. As we always say, the Abraham-Isaac human sacrifice story should be read in conjunction with the human sacrifice story of Jephtha and his daughter. Jephtha promised, if God granted him victory in battle, to slaughter the first thing that came out of his house when he returned home. He duly won and went home. His young daughter rushed out to greet him, and was put to death in a holocaust. “God” did not “stay” Jephtha’s hand. And here, of course, we have the fatal flaw of all Abrahamists: they are totally ignorant of their own sacred texts. They quote selectively. They have their cake and eat it. Abrahamists like to imply that Abraham knew God would not expect him to go through with it ... but he had no such knowledge. Moreover, God did expect Jephtha to murder his innocent daughter, and did nothing whatsoever to stop it. So, let the faith brigade talk their way out of that one. Even worse, “God” gratuitously wiped out Job’s whole family as a “test of his faith”. So, let no one be in any doubt that God expects you to murder your children if he orders it. Sometimes he will spare them and sometimes he won’t – you have no way of knowing in advance, so don’t pretend you have. Sometimes he himself will murder your whole family and expect you

to go on believing. So, will you? JAV obviously would because he’s a classic example of an irrational, brainwashed Abrahamist mired in the madness of faith ... faith in Satan himself.

***** BP: “Any god that feels the need to test your faith in him by ordering you to kill your own son is a monster.” Exactly so. Why is that not blindingly obvious to everyone? It’s an inconceivable action by a morally perfect, compassionate, loving God. It is, however, exactly what you would expect of the Devil.

***** JAV: “What speaks louder? – words, actions or intentions. Look deeper.” Yeah, why don’t you look deeper, you clown. Jephtha’s murder of his daughter to “honour” his God speaks deafeningly loudly. Why don’t you try reading your “holy” books rather than simply apologizing for them out of sheer ignorance of their horrific and murderous contents.

***** SSP: “You don’t tell us that Abraham was stopped by that same God due to the fact that He wanted only one human sacrifice, which is Jesus’ sacrifice. Your page be so convincing sometimes, but you can be a misleading: a wolf covered with a harmless coat.” What is this gibberish? “God” didn’t stop Jephtha, did he? He didn’t spare Job’s innocent family. And what kind of “dad” wants to make a sacrifice of his own son? Moreover, Jesus Christ must have wanted to sacrifice himself since there is of course only one God in Christianity since it’s a monotheistic religion (allegedly). “God” committed suicide! There’s nothing misleading about we say. We’re not the wolves in sheep’s clothing, you are! You’re the fellow traveller of the false prophets and the Devil himself. It’s no wonder Abrahamism rolls on given how many ignorant, irrational, brainwashed followers it has – all of whom are experts at

selectively quoting from their Bibles, and ignoring the endless amount of contradictory quotations. Who but a madman would worship a God that wiped out your whole family (as in the case of Job) for no other reason than to see if you would go on believing in him? Only criminal lunatics and unapologetic Devil worshippers would go on having faith in such a “God”.

***** O: “If I was God, I’d be more impressed if Abraham refused to sacrifice his son to me, then I’d know he was someone who stood up to bullies and his principles and his flesh and blood no matter what.” Indeed. If only everyone felt the same way.

Actions Speak Louder Than Words So, to all Abrahamists, we ask you a very simple question. One day you are walking along the road and suddenly you hear a voice in your head ordering you to kill your family. You have no other information to go on. Well, do you or don’t you kill them? That was exactly the situation Abraham found himself in. Would you do what Abraham did? If you did, you would be locked up forever in a mental asylum as a madman, or be put to death for murder in the first degree. If you agree with Abraham’s actions, you are a psychopath. It’s that simple. All psychopaths are perfectly happy to lay claim to “faith”. Eastern religion is the story of mystical intuitions. Western religion is the story of schizophrenic psychiatric episodes involving voices in the head being interpreted as encounters with the divine ... when in fact they were just encounters with madness. No fact is more startling and revealing about brainwashing than that some 50% of the human race worship the God of a would-be child-killer and find nothing surprising or shocking about that ... and will even eagerly defend their position by invoking some condition of mental illness known as “faith”. Faith, it seems, can justify anything – which is why so many people advocate it.

The Sacrifice Controversy

Many people of faith cannot accept the true horror of their beliefs and the deadly logic of their position, so they try to make them more palatable. Some people try to escape from the plainly told tale of Jephtha and his daughter by claiming that it was a mistranslation and that the daughter may instead have been sentenced to perpetual virginity or solitary confinement. What, and that’s supposed to make it OK? WTF! Even if that were the case, it would still be horrific beyond belief, unacceptable and evil! To all believers, face up to the truth of your mad beliefs. Accept full responsibility for them, and don’t attempt to dilute them to make you feel better. Try being honest for once in your life, for God’s sake!

The Devil Queen The Archbishop of Canterbury claimed that the queen of England’s life was one of self-sacrifice. She did not choose her role, he claimed, and was chosen by God. Chosen by which God? The Devil God of Abrahamism? What kind of God would ever appoint kings and queens? The queen is one of the richest people on earth and has numerous luxury palaces and endless five-star treatment. If only we could all be so self-sacrificing! As for choice, every instant in which she does not renounce royalty, she chooses her role.

Math MS: “Math has a purpose. However, it does not help us in answering why we exist.” On the contrary Mathematics is the only thing that answers why we exist. The God Series shows exactly why. “Ignorant men raise questions that wise men answered a thousand years ago...” – Goethe “What is not intelligible to me is not necessarily unintelligent.” – Nietzsche MS’s ignorance of mathematics is not a refutation of mathematics. The truth is not for everyone. If you don’t “get” mathematics, too bad. You will never understand why you exist. “To him who looks upon the world rationally, the world in its turn presents a rational aspect. The relation is mutual...” – Hegel

The English Taliban The English like to see themselves as tolerant and liberal, incapable of enduring any dictator, yet their own history refutes them. Following the end of the English Civil War and execution of King Charles I, England became a Christian Fundamentalist Republic, under the Lord Protector Oliver Cromwell, a fanatical Puritan. All frivolities were banned, including jesters, dancing and theatre. Christmas itself was made illegal since it involved people daring to have far too much fun. Cromwell belonged to the same personality type as Hitler and Osama bin Laden.

The Prophets The vast majority of people are submissive and will fall into line when they are in the presence of someone with a powerful vision. All the “prophets” in history weren’t selling God; they were selling themselves. Abraham, Moses, Jesus Christ, St Paul, St Peter, Mohammed, Luther etc. … they were dominants with a powerful message that submissives loved. Once you realise just how submissive people are, it changes your life. Submissives crave the voice of authority. They are begging to be led, controlled and dominated. If you can be authoritative, they will flock to your banner. If you hesitate, you’re lost! Submissives are immersed in doubts, so they worship those have no doubts at all. The fanatic is defined by the fact that he does not doubt. That makes him incredibly strong and intimidating to others.

Saving the Best “If you’re not giving the world the best you have, what world are you saving it for?” – Anonymous

The Capitalist “Cause”. No one fights for capitalism. No one goes to war on behalf of the maximisation of profit and minimisation of cost. No one marches beneath banners depicting the dollar. No one says, “I will give my life for Mammon”, no one gets into the trenches on behalf of Wall Street, no one fights for bankers. Capitalism is the cause of absolute self-interest, hence

cannot be a sacred cause. When people fight for money – capitalism – they always dress it up in the alternative language of “freedom and democracy”. In capitalism, those who have the most have the most to lose, hence they are those who support the status quo, or who demand that whatever mechanisms have made them rich and powerful are released even more. So, they are either deeply conservatives, or neoliberal extremists who want to sweep away everything getting in their way. Those who have the least have the most to gain from revolutionary change, hence should be the most radical. Yet often they’re completely cowed and submissive, and have fully accepted the “false consciousness” instilled in them by the elite. “Oh mortal man, is there anything you cannot be made to believe?” – Adam Weishaupt

The Plot To Kill God “God is dead,” said Nietzsche. “Kill God,” say the Illuminati – the old God, who is none other than the Devil. He is called Yahweh, Christ and Allah.

The New Model We need a New Model Army, New Model Police, New Model Government, New Model Parliament, New Model Economics, New Model Politics, New Model Religion, and a New Model Society. “The human race will then become one family, and the world will be the dwelling of Rational Men.” – Adam Weishaupt

The Politics of the Individual versus the Politics of the Collective In the past, a few individuals such as monarchs, warlords, tribal chiefs, prophets, high priests or dictators wielded immense power, while the masses were more or less powerless and at their mercy. Over the centuries, the question of rights for the individual has become far more important. Such rights invariably concern “negative liberty” –

protection from the State and the powers-that-be. The cult of the individual has been established where the individual is glorified and no one has any right to interfere him. The corollary has been that society, government and the Big State have all been called into question since, to varying degrees, they all conflict with the untrammelled liberty of the individual. All creeds of hyper individualism invariably end up as varieties of anarchism and libertarianism, where the wholesale dismantling of the State and government is demanded. The radical problem with being “free from” something ( “negative liberty”) is that it places no emphasis on being “free for” something (“positive liberty”). What should we desire? To be from some oppressive government or a collectivist system (but to what end?) or to be free for some grand undertaking where we transform ourselves and the world? Individuals cannot effect change on their own. No matter how smart, visionary and inspirational you are, you always require the help of others. Ironically, even the extreme individualistic anarchists seek to get others to buy into their ideas, because that’s the only way in which their ideas will ever be implemented. Change might begin with the personal vision of charismatic individuals but it always acts through the agency of the collective. One man cannot take on the world and beat it. One man can, however, harness the world and change it – through the collective. We could have a world of seven billion little islands, each hosting an extreme individualist revelling in his freedom from being told what to do by anyone else. But is he happy? What’s he free for? What’s he going to do? He’s unwilling to work with anyone else because he doesn’t want to compromise or in any way deviate from being his own sovereign lord. Well, good for him, but one thing’s for sure – such a world, such individuals, will never achieve anything at all. They will be mere animals. In fact, their world would soon perish since they’d all die of starvation, drought, cold, disease, depression, lack of companionship, and the inability to reproduce (because it requires the help and cooperation of another person, hence is “collectivist”). This, astoundingly, is the ultimate “vision” of all strains of anarchism. It’s almost incomprehensible how any sane, rational person could ever advocate anarchy. Anarchy emphasizes personal freedom and resistance to “evil” governments and “sinister” States. What anarchists never explain is

what happens when all the apparatus of government and State has vanished. The anarcho-capitalist libertarians say that everything will operate according to markets, but what does that mean? Who runs the army, the police, the legal system? Who looks after the poor? Who provides a fair education system? Who gives healthcare to the poor? Who builds commercially unviable roads? Who monitors pollution? Who funds academic research? Who promotes any vision beyond being mere consumerism? Will markets deliver a Star Trek future (where markets don’t exist!)? Will markets deliver equal opportunities for all and ensure that cartels and elites are prevented from rigging the markets? Will markets deliver a HyperHumanity? You must be joking. In such a system, we “escape” from the “oppression” of government and the State to the even worse oppression of markets and the elite market controllers, who are unaccountable to no one. From the frying pan into the fire! Only through cooperation, collective striving, mutual assistance, team work, and harnessing of the talents of all, can we build the optimal world for all. All those who oppose collective action and government are dangerous and evil. That’s true of all anarchists and libertarians. Extreme individualists are proponents of the unrestrained Freudian Id. What they oppose is the Freudian Superego (which conveys the rules of the collective). Their world would descend into chaos, extreme violence and mass murder in an instant. The laws of civilization would immediately be replaced by the laws of the jungle. The jungle is the ultimate market and the ultimate arena of personal freedom, yet who but a lunatic would want to live there? In the jungle, might is right. There’s no morality, no empathy, no sympathy, no cooperation (excepting ant colonies and the like – which are expressions of the collective!). It’s every animal for itself. No one is coming to help you. If you get injured, you’re a goner. The slightest sign of weakness and you’re finished. It’s staggering that so many people remain wedded to anarchist ideas. Anarchy would deliver hell itself. Civilization is about leaving the jungle behind us. Individualism is about taking us right back there.

Civilization is about Apollo and the Superego. Individualism is about Dionysus and the Id. For sure, we should create a space where Dionysus and the Id are healthily expressed, but to wish for a world where Apollo and the Superego are abolished and everyone is “free” from any rules, laws, restrictions and customs, is mad.

The Drunkenness of Noah Noah, the great prophet and patriarch, beloved of Yahweh, and in fact the father of all of humanity if you believe the Bible (given that everyone other than Noah’s family was wiped out by the great Flood) was a notorious drunk. He was a bum, a piss artist, a lush, getting naked amongst the vines as he got hammered on wine. His son Ham found him and laughed at the naked old fool. The rest of humanity was exterminated by Yahweh for being “debauched” and yet this sad, pathetic alcoholic was saved. Doesn’t it sum up Abrahamism that we’re all allegedly descended from a drunk in an alcoholic stupor?

Would It Have Been Better? Would it have been better if the world had never heard of Moses, Jesus Christ or Mohammed? Without question. Would it have been better if the world had never heard of Jews, Christians, Muslims or their Torture God? You bet. There’s nothing at all about the world that wouldn’t be radically improved by the complete obliteration of Abrahamism. Abrahamists are the single biggest obstacle to human progress. That’s a fact. The Abrahamists have ruined the world with their crazy beliefs, with their unapologetic worship of a cosmic psychopath. A report told the tale of a 15-year-old Syrian boy shot through the head in front of his family by Islamist rebels because he used the name of the Prophet Mohammed flippantly in an argument with another boy. He said (shock, horror), “I wouldn’t give you a free cup of coffee even if you were the Prophet Mohammed.”. For that, he was detained, tortured, and finally

executed once his parents had been rounded up to witness it. That’s Islam for you. And to think that the American and European governments actually talk of arming these maniacs. If a single weapon is handed over, all those who took the decision should be prosecuted for war crimes and crimes against humanity. From the point of view of the healthy progress of the world, everything possible should be done by the West to encourage civil war between Sunni and Shia Muslims. The only way Islam will ever be reformed is for it to be convulsed with internal bloodletting. Thus speaks the Dialectic. Thus speaks history itself. War is a great evil, but often it’s often the only way to bring about sane change.

Food and Power Animals kill other animals for food and power. Humans kill other humans purely for power.

“How can I avoid Inheritance Tax through Trusts?” Financial advisers will tell you that there are a number of ways to reduce inheritance tax by putting assets into trusts. Assets placed in trusts are given to the nominated beneficiaries and are no longer considered part of the settlor’s estate (the settlor being the person who originally owned the assets). These assets will therefore not be subject to inheritance tax when the person passes away. One of the “benefits” of trusts is that the assets assigned to them can no longer be used to pay any outstanding debts. Many people seem to believe that inheritance tax would be easily circumvented via a mechanism such as a trust fund. Let’s be crystal clear. The adoption of 100% inheritance tax also entails the abolition of all means to avoid paying it. The whole point of inheritance tax is to prevent the dead from having influence over the living and from selectively passing on their assets to their privileged chosen ones rather than to the Commonwealth. It would be absurd if the rich were allowed to take pre-emptive measures during their lives to carry out exactly the selective transfer of assets that inheritance tax is designed to eradicate.

Karmic Drivel

BBC Thought for the Day by Akhandadhi Das on 12/06/2013: “Most of us are savvy enough to know that our every click, search, swipe, email or download may be recorded and any useful information passed on for commercial purposes. “But, this week’s revelations about alleged sharing of internet data with the US government is for many people a step too far. It’s a complex story, and it raises the issues of trust and power. Commercial companies may be motivated to extract our cash, but I begrudgingly accept incessant marketing messages as the trade-off for the convenience of being online. “However, the state has greater powers – and with that, the need to win greater trust. Even with good intentions to provide public security, there’s a chance that some data might be misinterpreted, or mistakes made, affecting innocent people’s lives. We must be able to trust not only the motives of our governments, but also their ability to act efficiently and wisely. “This debate about surveillance and data reminds me of a discussion some years ago on karma – the Vedic concept of action and reaction which regulates human activities. One eminent scientist declared that he could not accept the idea of karma, on the basis that it would be impossible to monitor the actions of everyone on the planet. “However, within the few decades since computing began, we can now capture and assess almost every word and deed of our digital life. Maybe, by appreciating how far man-made data processing has come in such a short time, I’d suggest it’s no longer inconceivable that there might be a cosmic system capable of analysing every human action. “Karma doesn’t cause the circumstances of the material world – freewill does. Karma processes the ramifications of our desires and it balances the outcomes – not just within a single human lifetime – but equalised out over many lives through reincarnation. “We know computer systems can go awry, so it’s perhaps disconcerting to think that along with everything, there’s also a cosmic sized monitoring system. Fortunately, says the Bhagavad Gita, the application of karma is not blind nor impersonal. There is a benign and competent supreme authority scrutinizing the process. With state surveillance, we may not know if all the rules are being followed. At least with karma, the Bhagavad Gita claims, we can. And if we are concerned with what might have been recorded about us, we can appeal to have our karmic history wiped clean. In the Gita that supreme authority states, ‘I will free you from all past actions.’... As much

as Vedanta promotes the equality of all life, it also helps us to recognise the subtly different restrictions or benefits for the soul as it transmigrates from life in one species to another. Vedanta accepts that all creatures express some form of love, but only when the soul is in a human body does it gain the additional awareness of the intrinsic rightness or wrongness of one’s own actions. My dogs know when they’ve done something I think is bad and they show contrition, but I reckon it’s only because I am upset with them, not because they have a guilty conscience. Vedanta ascribes the responsibility for our actions – good or bad – to humans and thus karma can only be accrued from human actions not by anything done whilst we are in an animal body.” Akhandadhi Das is an adherent of Vaishnava Vedanta philosophy – one of the main strands of the Hindu wisdom tradition. So, there you have it, Karmists say, “...there’s also a cosmic sized monitoring system. Fortunately, says the Bhagavad Gita, the application of karma is not blind nor impersonal. There is a benign and competent supreme authority scrutinizing the process.” So much for all the nonsense we’ve read on Facebook posts saying that karma has nothing to do with good and evil, with morality, with the accounting of sin; that no one is monitoring us, that karma isn’t a moral person or moral force. Karma is simply Big Brother on a cosmic scale, just the same as the Abrahamic God watching everything we do and judging everything we do, and arranging the cosmos to reward or punish us depending on our deeds.

The Great Event In 70 CE, the Roman army under Titus sacked Jerusalem, destroyed its temple to Jehovah and carried off its treasures back to Rome. Shouldn’t there be an annual global celebration of this great event when the Devil God of Judaism was decisively defeated? All hail Titus! Where is the new Titus to level Jerusalem – this unholiest of all cities – once and for all?

Hadrian The Jews hate the Roman Emperor Hadrian even more than Titus. Regarding the Second Roman-Jewish war (of 132-136 CE), Wikipedia says,

“In 130, Hadrian visited the ruins of Jerusalem, in Roman Judaea, left after the First Roman-Jewish War of 66–73. He rebuilt the city, initially allowing the rebuilding of the Temple, but then changing his mind and renaming it Aelia Capitolina after himself and Jupiter Capitolinus, the chief Roman deity. ... Hadrian built a large temple to the goddess Venus on top of what later Christians would come to venerate as the tomb of Christ. “A new temple dedicated to the worship of Jupiter was built on the ruins of the old Jewish Second Temple, which had been destroyed in 70. In addition, Hadrian abolished circumcision, which was considered by Romans and Greeks as a form of bodily mutilation and hence barbaric. “These anti-Jewish policies of Hadrian triggered in Judaea a massive Jewish uprising, led by Simon bar Kokhba and Akiba ben Joseph. Following the outbreak of the revolt, Hadrian called his general Sextus Julius Severus from Britain, and troops were brought from as far as the Danube. Roman losses were very heavy, and it is believed that an entire legion was destroyed. Indeed, Roman losses were so heavy that Hadrian’s report to the Roman Senate omitted the customary salutation ‘I and the legions are well’. “Hadrian’s army eventually put down the rebellion in 135, after three years of fighting. According to Cassius Dio, during the war 580,000 Jews were killed, 50 fortified towns and 985 villages razed. The final battle took place in Beitar, a fortified city 10 km southwest of Jerusalem. The city only fell after a lengthy siege, and Hadrian only allowed the Jews to bury their dead after a period of six days. According to the Babylonian Talmud, after the war Hadrian continued the persecution of Jews. “He attempted to root out Judaism, which he saw as the cause of continuous rebellions, prohibited the Torah law, the Hebrew calendar and executed Judaic scholars. The sacred scroll was ceremonially burned on the Temple Mount. In an attempt to erase the memory of Judaea, he renamed the province Syria Palaestina (after the Philistines), and Jews were forbidden from entering its rededicated capital. When Jewish sources mention Hadrian it is always with the epitaph ‘may his bones be crushed’, an expression never used even with respect to Vespasian or Titus who destroyed the Second Temple. ... Rabbinic Judaism became a religion centred around synagogues, and the Jews themselves dispersed throughout the Roman world and beyond. With the destruction of Jerusalem, important

centres of Jewish culture developed in the Galilee and in Babylonia and work on the Talmud continued in these locations.”

***** Isn’t it time to rebuild a pagan temple on Temple Mount, one devoted to Venus, the goddess of love and sex? It’s time to abolish Jehovah once and for all!

The Catastrophe One of history’s most disastrous events was when the Roman Empire converted to Christianity, thus precipitating the Abrahamic Dark Ages, from which we have still not truly emerged.

Reptilians “Reptilians (also called reptoids, reptiloids, or draconians) are purported reptilian humanoids that play a prominent role in science fiction, as well as modern ufology and conspiracy theories. The idea of reptilians on Earth was popularized by David Icke, a conspiracy theorist who says shapeshifting reptilian people control our world by taking on human form and gaining political power to manipulate our societies. Icke has claimed on multiple occasions that many of the world leaders are, or are possessed by, reptilians attempting to gain power to rule the world. ... “According to British writer David Icke, 5- to 12-foot (1.5–3.7 m) tall, blood-drinking, shape-shifting reptilian humanoids from the Alpha Draconis star system, now hiding in underground bases, are the force behind a worldwide conspiracy against humanity. He contends that most of the world’s leaders are related to these reptilians, including George W. Bush of the United States, and Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom. Icke’s conspiracy theories now have supporters in 47 countries and he has given lectures to crowds of up to 6,000. American writer Vicki Santillano included it in her list of the 10 most popular conspiracy theories, describing it as the ‘wackiest theory’ she had encountered. A poll of Americans in 2013 by Public Policy Polling showed that 4% of registered voters believed in David Icke’s ideas. ... “Icke argues that humanity was created by a network of secret societies run by an ancient race of interbreeding bloodlines from the Middle and

Near East, originally extraterrestrial. Icke calls them the ‘Babylonian Brotherhood.’ The Brotherhood is mostly male. Their children are raised from an early age to understand the mission; those who fail to understand it are pushed aside. The spread of the reptilian bloodline encompasses what Norman Simms calls the odd and ill-matched, extending to 43 American presidents, three British and two Canadian prime ministers, various Sumerian kings and Egyptian pharaohs, and a smattering of celebrities such as Bob Hope. Key Brotherhood bloodlines are the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, various European royal and aristocratic families, the establishment families of the Eastern United States, and the British House of Windsor. Icke identified the Queen Mother in 2001 as ‘seriously reptilian.’ “The Illuminati, Round Table, Council on Foreign Relations, Chatham House, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group, the International Monetary Fund, and the United Nations, are all Brotherhood created and controlled, as are the media, military, CIA, Mossad, science, religion, and the Internet, with witting or unwitting support from the London School of Economics. At the apex of the Brotherhood stands the ‘Global Elite,’ identified throughout history as the Illuminati, and at the top of the Global Elite stand the ‘Prison Wardens.’ The goal of the Brotherhood – their ‘Great Work of Ages’ – is world domination and a micro-chipped population. ... “Icke introduced the reptoid hypothesis in The Biggest Secret (1999), which identified the Brotherhood as descendants of reptilians from the constellation Draco, who walk on two legs and appear human, and who live in tunnels and caverns inside the earth. He argues that the reptilians are the race of gods known as the Anunnaki in the Babylonian creation myth, Enûma Eliš. According to Barkun, Icke’s idea of ‘inner-earth reptilians’ is not new, though he has done more than most to expand it. “Lewis and Kahn write that Icke has taken his ‘ancient astronaut’ narrative from the Israeli-American writer, Zecharia Sitchin, who argued – for example in Divine Encounters (1995) – that the Anunnaki had come to Earth for its precious metals. Icke argues that they came specifically for ‘monoatomic gold,’ a mineral he says can increase the carrying capacity of the nervous system ten thousandfold. After ingesting it, the reptilians can process vast amounts of information, speed up trans-dimensional travel, and shapeshift from reptilian to human form. They use human fear, guilt, and aggression as energy. ‘Thus we have the encouragement of wars,’ he wrote

in 1999, ‘human genocide, the mass slaughter of animals, sexual perversions which create highly charged negative energy, and black magic ritual and sacrifice which takes place on a scale that will stagger those who have not studied the subject.’ Lewis and Kahn argue that Icke is using allegory to depict the alien, and alienating, nature of global capitalism. ... “The reptilians not only come from another planet, but are also from another dimension, the lower level of the fourth dimension, the one nearest the physical world. Icke writes that the universe consists of an infinite number of frequencies or dimensions that share the same space, just like television and radio frequencies. Some people can tune their consciousness to other wavelengths, which is what psychic power consists of, and it is from one of these other dimensions that the Anunnaki are controlling this world – although just as fourth-dimensional reptilians control us, they are controlled in turn by a fifth dimension. The lower level of the fourth dimension is what others call the ‘lower astral dimension.’ Icke argued that it is where demons live, the entities Satanists summon during their rituals. They are, in fact, summoning the reptilians. Barkun argues that the introduction of different dimensions allows Icke to skip awkward questions about which part of the universe the reptilians come from, and how they got here.” – Wikipedia

***** David Icke is a modern version of Moses, Jesus Christ and Mohammed – a Messianic lunatic who imagines himself a great prophet saving humanity. Like his diabolical predecessors, he tells an outrageous and downright insane Mythos, simply replacing angels and demons with his believers on one hand and alien lizards on the others. The IQ of his followers must be as low as that of the Abrahamists, barely escaping single figures. Icke’s books are fiction and outright fantasy. They have nothing whatsoever to do with reality. What he proves is that countless humans continue to possess the Moron Gene that allows people to swallow the biggest nonsense imaginable and believe it to be the absolute truth.

The Unrevealed God

God never reveals himself. Why not? How spectacularly convenient for believers that what they believe in never has to be subjected to real encounters. Yet, in Jesus Christ, God allegedly did reveal himself. Well, that went well, didn’t it? Given that the vast majority of people in the world do not believe in Jesus Christ then he plainly didn’t strike most people as a convincing Godlike figure. Read the New Testament. Do you feel yourself in the presence of divine thinking, or of some bloke saying a lot of trite, platitudinous, contradictory, confusing Jewish things with zero intellectual content – no philosophy, science, mathematics, politics or economics? If that’s God speaking then plenty of people in world history have been infinitely superior to God! Why do Christians accept such a feeble, anti-intellectual and impotent God ... someone who ended up being crucified as a common criminal rebelling against mighty Rome? Christians have a staggering lack of imagination of what God ought to be like. Whatever God is, he isn’t the Jew Yehoshua ben Yosef who didn’t actually call himself God at any time! If he didn’t think he was God, and he didn’t claim to be God, why should anyone else? Gnostic and Arian Christians didn’t believe that Jesus Christ was God but rather the greatest of angels (like Lucifer, in fact!). Weren’t they far more logical than the “true” Christians? Christians simply talked themselves into believing in Jesus Christ as God. Not one word of the New Testament actually says he is. At all times, he makes it clear that he’s the “son” of God, a title to which many people in the ancient world laid claim, including the Roman emperors. Alexander the Great thought he was the son of God, and it must have seemed to many people that he was! He was certainly far more convincing than Jesus Christ.

God Forsaken “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me.” – Jesus Christ Isn’t that the oddest thing imaginable for the True God to say? How can God deny that he is God and claim to have been forsaken by himself? If you ask a Christian, you won’t get a rational Logos answer, but some tear-jerking Mythos-Pathos story about suffering and despair .... blah, blah, blah. Christians always fall for the Mythos, and never once show any

interest in Logos (although, crazily, Jesus Christ is often called the Logos – the Word made flesh).

Ego Max Ego Max: a bigger and better Ego! (A more egotistical ego.) Narcissists and psychopaths are those who possess Ego Max. Ego Min: the ego of humble people.

The World in Crisis We live in a world without values, without spirit. Everything is materialist and consumerist. Everything is profane. There is nothing sacred anymore. God is dead. Yet humanity craves a higher dimension and, one way or another, it will have it, whether it’s real or not. So, we have the phenomenon of the phoney sacred, the fake sacred, the sacred forgery, the ersatz sacred, the sacred simulacra, the hyperreal sacred (the more sacred than sacred). Celebrities are elevated to divinities. Sports stars are worshipped as Gods. Super rich entrepreneurs are revered. Bankers are feared as though they are angry deities. Movies are full of superheroes and fantasy heroes who can solve every problem. When things go viral, sacred communion between the masses takes place over the internet. Fans scour the internet for any news of their deities. They devour celebrity gossip and tittle tattle. Conspiracy theorists devise new religions involving aliens and Sumerians. They have the same beliefs towards the “Illuminati” as the Jews did towards the Babylonians or the Christians towards the Roman Empire. They see themselves as God’s elect being oppressed by some sinister, ungodly empire ruled by wicked elites that must be overthrown. But be careful what you wish for. Babylon and Rome were both vastly superior to Jerusalem. The last thing we need is the New Jerusalem of David Icke and Alex Jones. In this profane world, success is deemed sacred, and people will do anything to be successful. The world has become louder and louder, brasher and brasher, more and more vulgar and garish, shrieking for attention. Civility and rationality have perished. Look at Alex Jones, literally shouting his way through life to get people to look at him. A total moron. David Icke

has to summon shape-shifting lizards from another dimension to get noticed. In previous ages, Moses, Christ and Mohammed all had to pretend they could speak to God. Above all, the event, the spectacle, has become sacred. It has to be as big and mind-blowing as possible. Special effects must get better and better, grander and grander, vaster and vaster. New technology must support divine illusions and miracles. We live in a world of CGI Gods.

The Closed Circuit What is the dream of the privileged elite? It’s to construct a closed circuit of power and wealth whereby dynastic families rule in perpetuity and no one else can ever break in to the magic circle. The elite see themselves as the elect, the saved, the guardians of civilisation, holding back the tides of barbarism. They never see themselves for what they are – greedy, selfish, venal psychopaths ruining the world in order to serve their own ends.

How To Understand Our World All you have to do is Follow the Money. Money explains everything and is at the root of everything. The New World Order – where there’s no longer any money to follow, only merit.

Meritocracy In response to a comment that millions of children in the UK are growing up in severe poverty, a person remarked that it was because their parents were lazy. So, here we have the central issue of meritocracy. Should your life be determined by the laziness or hard work of your parents? In either case, it’s nothing to do with you. Why should you be punished or rewarded for things completely out of your control? Children born to rich parents prosper and children born to poor parents fail. In neither case, do the children deserve the fate they get. It’s ridiculous, unacceptable and immoral for children to suffer for the “sins of their fathers”. Yet there are a disturbing number of people – indeed the vast majority – who believe that children should indeed be penalised for

having lazy parents or rewarded for having rich parents. These are the supporters of privilege and inheritance and they are the great obstacle that meritocrats must overcome. The only person who should control your fate is yourself. The only actions for which you should be rewarded or punished are your own. It’s insane to claim that it’s legitimate for you to be accountable for the deeds and character of others. Why was the whole human race punished for the disobedience of Adam and Eve? That is the Nazi Reprisals system of “morality” – where all are guilty for any crime committed by any one of them.

The World Bully Within the last fifty years, America dropped napalm and Agent Orange on Vietnamese villagers. It carpet bombed Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam. It fired countless artillery shells at the Vietnamese. Now, America condemns Syria. Has America apologised to the world for Vietnam? Has it changed its Constitution to ensure it can never happen again? Has it indicted as war criminals everyone who led the war? Has it denounced Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon as war mongers, war criminals and slaughterers of millions of innocent Vietnamese civilians? Is America the most hypocritical nation on earth? It sees fault with everyone else, but never with itself. “You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.” – Matthew 7:5

The Crony Education System Five elite schools in England send more pupils to Oxford and Cambridge (Britain’s two top universities) than 2,000 other schools combined. That means you have a 400-1 educational advantage if you attend any of these privileged institutions. Four of them belong to the most expensive private schools in the world: Eton, Westminster, St Paul’s Boys and St Paul’s Girls. The other is a Sixth Form College in Cambridge itself. You think you have an equal opportunity in life? You must be insane.

Delaware City: Tax-Dodge City “It lacks the palm-fringed sandy beaches of the Cayman Islands. Or the craggy Alpine peaks of Liechtenstein. But should the second smallest US

state, Delaware, go on a blacklist of globally notorious tax havens? “A wedge-shaped chunk of land 96 miles long sitting halfway between Washington and New York, the state of Delaware is home to 870,000 people, 0.3% of the US population. But more than half of the nation’s publicly traded companies are incorporated here, including 60% of the Fortune 500 firms. One anonymous office block serves as the registered address of more than 200,000 corporations. “Delaware’s status as a corporate honeypot has attracted the unwelcome attention of Luxembourg’s prime minister, Jean-Claude Juncker, who last week declared that if his country was to be picked upon as an alleged tax haven, then Delaware should get the same treatment. ... A single low-rise, yellow-brick building, 1209 Orange Street, is the legally registered office of more than 200,000 companies including Ford, American Airlines, General Motors, Coca-Cola and Kentucky Fried Chicken. ... Companies are lured here by a friendly tax regime and sophisticated courts. Corporate advisers cheerfully admit that few companies registered in Delaware do much, if any, business in the state. “This phenomenon has come under attack elsewhere. Criticising tax havens during the election campaign, Barack Obama alighted on a single building in the Cayman Islands, Ugland House, which is the registered office for more than 12,000 US companies, alleging: ‘That’s either the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax scam on record.’ “The lure of Delaware is two-fold. On the fiscal side, the state only imposes a corporate income tax on profits that are earned within the state. Subsidiaries operating elsewhere in the US don’t have to pay – and as Delaware is tiny – that means little tax liability.” – Andrew Clark, The Guardian Everyone in America ought to become self-employed, working for their own company, registered in Delaware City. Then everyone can avoid paying their proper tax! Profitable companies are supposed to taxes. These days, their main focus is to avoid paying tax. Is that socially acceptable? The cowboys used to be in Dodge City. Now they’ve moved to Delaware City.

Parkinson’s Law

“Work expands so as to fill the time available for its completion.” – Cyril Northcote Parkinson Or The amount of time which one has to perform a task is the amount of time it will take to complete the task. So, the more you want to achieve, the less time you should allow yourself. “God” is he who achieves tasks in no time at all, hence God is the opposite of the “Parkinson worker”. “The important work of moving the world forward does not wait to be done by perfect men.” – George Eliot

Do No Evil If Adam and Eve knew nothing of good and evil before eating of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil then they could not have known it was wrong to disobey God (just as children don’t know the difference between what is acceptable and what isn’t until they are taught). They would have had no more moral accountability than a dog told by its master not to gnaw a bone. Adam and Eve were simple innocents before they ate from the Tree, and yet they were punished as if they were knowing philosophers.

The Big Lie The capitalist super rich call themselves “wealth creators”. In fact, they are society wreckers.

Retrospective Judgment and Punishment Moses came down from the mountain with the Ten Commandments and punished the idolatrous horde worshipping the golden calf. According to the Catholic Vulgate translation of the Bible, 23,000 people were put to death in one night! However, since the Ten Commandments had only just been “published” and since the laws of Moses had not yet been established, which laws were the idolaters knowingly breaking? God slaughtered 23,000 people for breaking a law that none of them knew about! Is that legal? Is it moral? How can you punish people who didn’t know they were doing anything wrong?

In the Nuremberg trials of the Nazis, the Allies put to death many people who said they were only obeying orders. Well, Abraham was willing to put his son to death because of God’s Order. Why didn’t the Nuremberg prosecutors convict and hang him (retrospectively). Of course, most of the prosecutors were themselves Abrahamists, meaning that they themselves would do anything their God ordered, including murder – just like the Nazis they were convicting!!! What a world! By the same token, “God”, in the Great Flood, wiped out the whole human race bar Noah and his family. He committed the near extermination of his own creations even though they had broken no published laws, rules or commandments – because God hadn’t bothered his ass to communicate to the Earth’s people what he actually wanted of them. So, you are expected to be a mind reader and know the mind of God even though he hasn’t said or communicated anything. Is that a fair, just and sane religion? Are we expected to slavishly obey God’s commands even if they are murderous, but be put to death if we obey anyone else’s murderous commands?

How Abrahamism Operates “They came with a Bible and their religion, stole our land, crushed our spirit and now they tell us we should be thankful to the Lord for being saved.” – Pontiac, Native American Chief (1718 – 1769) Wouldn’t America now be a vastly better place if the socialistic values of the Native Americans had been preferred over the capitalistic values of Protestant Christianity? It’s astounding how the humans always chooses the wrong path when offered the choice. They always choose the same path – the one that gives a small aggressive elite (“the alpha apes”) power over everyone else.

Due Diligence Given that so many Jews are lawyers, shouldn’t they have spotted that something is fundamentally wrong with their contract (covenant) with their God? Didn’t they perform due diligence? Given that the Egyptians, Assyrians, Babylonians, Greeks, Romans, all European nations and the Nazis successfully persecuted the Jews, you would have thought that these

people would have twigged that they were not so much “Chosen People” as “Victim People”, the “Targeted People”. If all of this horror happened to them when they were “favoured” by God, what would it have been like for them if they weren’t favoured? Either the Jewish people repudiated the Covenant (the contract) by being insufficiently worshipful towards their God, or their God repudiated the Covenant by doing nothing at all to protect his Chosen Ones from their enemies. So, look at the history of the world and judge for yourselves. Throughout history, we see worshipful Jews, despised all across the world. We don’t see any Jewish God helping his people against their enemies. There can be no doubt about the party that reneged on the sacred Covenant – the Jewish God! And all Jews know it.

Bias RR: “I like your overall point but it seems a little biased at the end! Try to avoid personal bias?” Er, why? If you don’t like what we say, go elsewhere. Don’t tell us what to think and how to express ourselves – unless you’re the world’s greatest genius. You are of course manifesting your own personal bias!

Superbullshit “Superman’s mythical origins are rooted in the timeless reality of a spiritual superhero who also lived a modest life until extraordinary times required a supernatural response. How might the story of Superman awaken our passion for the greatest hero who ever lived and died and rose again?” – Christian sermon about the Superman movie Man of Steel. “He has the most extraordinary powers. He has the most extraordinary ideals to live up to. He’s very God-like in a lot of ways and it’s been difficult to imagine that in a contemporary setting.” – Christopher Nolan, Producer of the Superman movie Man of Steel So, there we have it, Jesus Christ is now a superhero like Batman, Spiderman, Superman, and so on. In other words, he’s a comic-book character, a fiction, a fantasy, a myth.

Superman = SuperJesus.

Nature DD: “Nature defines who has merit by who accumulates power, such as who accumulates the most financial power. Then, those with financial power outline government programs designed to maintain this financial power. The programs define ‘merit’ and promote the best servants accordingly. The real powers always retreat to the shadows so that the dupes can believe those with merit are really in control or their duly elected officials are in control. Since we’re entering into the Age of Aquarius, the powers-that-be have organized a scientific or technocratic dictatorship, i.e. the New World Order. Thus, this meritocracy must be promoted heavily. In fact, if I could get a chance to network with those who knew how things really worked, I’d promote this idea heavily too!!” Nature doesn’t define anything. It’s not a conscious intelligence. Nature, according to the modern interpretation of Darwin’s theory of evolution, produces random mutations, which it then operates on through natural selection. Now that we seemingly know how Nature works, we (human beings) – as the highest products of nature in our world – can naturally select. We can decide who gets to have power and who doesn’t. There isn’t any irresistible force compelling us to accept the rule of elites. People choose to. They could resist if they wanted. They don’t. It’s their own weakness and cowardice that allows the elites to walk all over them. But we can all become strong and brave whenever we want. It’s simply a choice we make. All we have to say is, “I’m not going to take this anymore”, and act accordingly. There’s no mystery about it. DD is a typical, sad, pathetic, anti-meritocratic conspiracy theorist who can’t imagine what a true meritocrat is – because he’s so far from being one himself. In a meritocracy, there are no “powers-that-be” lurking in the shadows. That could happen only in the false democracies with which our world is plagued. No meritocrat would ever be anyone else’s puppet. If you were, you wouldn’t be a meritocrat. It’s part of the definition, dumbass. Humanity can wipe out privileged elites with one snap of its fingers. 100% inheritance tax – and making illegal all transfers of assets intended to

circumvent 100% inheritance tax – would abolish the dynastic family elites (the Old World Order) almost overnight. What the world desperately needs is an NWO – a New World Order. People such as DD are blind, deluded, anti-meritocratic supporters of the Old World Order. He even says he would operate in just the same way as they do if he got the chance – which reveals exactly what type of person we are dealing with here ... the scum of the earth. It’s exactly because of conspiracy theorists such as DD that we can’t get rid of the elites. He believes they are somehow ordained by God or Nature to rule over us. We are rational beings. Neither God nor nature will dictate to us. We are free to choose our own way of doing things. That’s why we’re meritocrats.

The Movement Rebooted: The Birth of the New Model Society Whether you like it or not, whether you know it or not, the world revolution is here. The fate of all of us is being decided. Everywhere, people are showing that they no longer accept the old ways. The transformation of the world is already in progress. The real issue is this ... what are you doing about it? What’s your contribution? Are you someone who watches from the sidelines, or are you a person actually making a difference? When in years to come your children and grandchildren ask you what you did when the Revolution happened, will you be able to tell them the truth, or will you have to lie and pretend you did heroic things when in fact you stayed at home gorging on junk food as you watched it all on TV? Now is the hour when the heroes are separated from the cowards. Which are you? If you’re like most people, you’ll say, “Sure, I’m one of the heroes”, and then do absolutely nothing. Because doing anything is hard, and being a hero is far beyond the capabilities of most sheep-like human beings, who will do something only if everyone else is doing it. That’s why social media is proving so crucial – it gives the otherdirected masses group “permission” to take to the streets. Protesting has become a social activity. There will come a time when you will seem like a freak if you’re not protesting. Social media is therefore the deadliest weapon the elite have ever faced. It’s the social glue that brings even the sheeple out onto the front line.

The tipping point is coming. When it does, everything will change. All Revolutions against the Old World Order (the ruling establishment of the rich, privileged elite) have begun in secret with clandestine groups and societies. The Founding Fathers of America were all secret society Revolutionaries. The French Revolution was led by secret societies. The Russian Revolution was likewise led by secret societies. So, what do we find in the modern day? – legions of morons who are against secret societies, hence are fellow travellers of the rich elite. Many of these same people openly support anarcho-capitalist libertarianism, the evil doctrine of Ayn Rand who, in Atlas Shrugged, advocated the abolition of government and its replacement by the outright rule of the super rich, led by the dictator “John Galt”. Rand infamously claimed that selfishness is “virtuous” – which tells you everything you need to know about her evil, “greed is good” supporters. The ludicrous notion that 9/11 was perpetrated by the American government rather than maniacal Muslim terrorists is a manifestation of the pathological hatred (which Ayn Rand did so much to stoke) of the very principle of government. She portrayed government itself as a conspiracy against liberty, and unfettered markets as the quintessence of freedom. The 9/11 conspiracy theory was intended to generate such hatred of the American government that it would lead to its overthrow, paving the way for John Galts to come forward and rule via unregulated free-market capitalism, of which they would be the undisputed masters and controllers. All supporters of the “Truth” Movement are those who would rather believe that the American government – full of very rich capitalists devoted to making enormous profits from the consumerist sheeple – would prefer to murder them rather than make obscene amounts of money from them, and that Islamic psychopaths who detest everything the infidel, depraved Americans stand for are in fact America’s best friends who would never do any harm to America under any circumstances. Dream on! Try reading Understanding Muhammad and Muslims by Ali Sina and wake up to what 9/11 was actually all about. Enter the real world. To all Americans, your government is an evil capitalist monster. Oppose it for that reason, not for the lie that it kills its own idiotic capitalist masses. Why would anyone destroy the retarded hand that feeds it? The rich capitalist rulers of America would love nothing more than for America to become a Randian land where the rich can do whatever they like with

absolute impunity ... and they’re already very close to that outcome. The anarcho-capitalist libertarians are the best friends the super rich have ever had. The “Truth” Movement is actually the “We love the super rich elite” Movement. It’s not government that’s the inherent enemy but the super rich, especially when they use their money and power to hijack governments and use them for their own private good – for privilege, nepotism and cronyism. All authentic secret societies are opposed to the rich powers-that-be and for enlightened, rational, meritocratic government of the type described by Plato in The Republic, wherein a nation’s leaders are specifically forbidden from owning private property and having any private wealth. The “secret” societies of the elite, on the other hand, are faux secret societies. Where authentic secret societies are revolutionary, faux secret societies are conservative, pro-establishment and counter-revolutionary, and are all about money, corruption, privilege, nepotism and cronyism. If you’re such a fool that you can’t conceive of secret societies with radically different agendas, it shows at what level of mental sophistication you operate. No wonder you believe that the Illuminati are comic-book, shape-shifting, pan-dimensional lizard creatures from another world. You probably believe in Santa Claus and Jesus Christ too! What will the last, great conflict that defines the human race be about? It will concern whether the libertarian followers of the super rich – and their plan to seize world power via capitalist globalization – prevail, or rationalist meritocrats devoted to the betterment of the whole human race by giving everyone a genuine equal opportunity to have a wonderful life. In today’s world, only the rich have good lives, and all the rest live in fear, misery and degradation. Whose side are you on? It’s time to choose.

The Revolution is Here. The Revolution is Now. The Occupy protests throughout Western countries and the mass demonstrations in Turkey and Brazil were remarkable for one reason – they were not directed at dictators but at how democratic nations are being governed. Democracy itself has been called into question. The problem with democracy is the most ancient of all problems: it has been pressed into the service of the elites. Democracy isn’t about helping the people to have better lives. Instead, it does what all oppressive systems

have done throughout history – it enables the elites to acquire more and more wealth and power. Democracy, with its mantra of “one person, one vote” implies equality and respect between all citizens. Yet if you look at any democratic nation in practice, you will see a super rich elite running everything and a great mass of nobodies being fed “bread and circuses” to sedate them and prevent them from seeing what’s really going on. The super rich citizens of today’s democracies are wealthier than monarchs, nobles and oligarchs were at any time in history. If democracy, in favouring the cause of rich men, has surpassed systems explicitly devoted to the interests of the rich, how can the conclusion be avoided that democracy is in fact plutocracy – rule by the rich? In democracies, the rich have pulled off a staggering trick. They have trumpeted the importance of the democratic vote, which supposedly empowers ordinary people, while at the same time rendering this vote impotent and meaningless. All democracies work in conjunction with capitalism, which is controlled by “the market”, which in turn is controlled and rigged by bankers, corporations, stock traders and the super rich. No democratic vote is ever applied to the market and its controllers. No market participant is ever elected by the people or is in any way accountable to the people. In “capitalist democracy”, which half of that description actually wields the power – the capitalist or democratic part? The answer is painfully obvious. Capitalist democracies are fundamentally and quintessentially capitalist systems designed to serve the capitalist elite (which is why the rich keep getting richer and the poor poorer), and the “democracy” part is the sop provided to the common herd to deceive them into thinking they have the power to change who governs them. No matter how often the sheeple vote, they will never change who actually rules them – the unelected, unaccountable rich elite. The elite are never up for election. And can never be voted out. Capitalist democracy is the supreme con trick, the most ingenious hustle of all time. It has produced the perfect “false consciousness”. The masses think they have power through the ballot box – and the elite continually reinforce this rhetoric with their mantra of “freedom and democracy” (note how “freedom” and “capitalism” are subtly equated as the inevitable companion of democracy) – but in fact the masses have no power at all. We are ruled by rich cartels and the market they control that dictates our

economic circumstances. Those in charge of the economy are the real rulers of capitalist democracies, not the democratically elected politicians who have no control over the market (and were never intended to have any). Once you have grasped that democracy is all smoke and mirrors, concealing what’s really going on, you understand that it must be overthrown. If the people are ever to be in charge, they must control the economy. Imagine a world in which all senior bankers, CEOs, traders and super rich entrepreneurs are civil servants, or directly elected and publicly accountable public officials. Our world would be transformed overnight. For the first time ever, the people would be genuinely in charge. Of course, to accept a system in which capitalism is subordinated to democracy rather than democracy to capitalism is to wholly change the nature of capitalism. The anarcho-capitalist libertarian followers of Any Rand want to get rid of government, the State and democracy entirely and have everything run by markets. They want to abolish the “democracy” part of the phrase “capitalist democracy” and be left with unrestrained capitalism in which there’s no electorate at all because nothing gets voted on. The market, in their system, would be ubiquitous and presented as the solution to every problem. The opposite approach is to neutralize the “capitalist” part of “capitalist democracy” and bring capitalism entirely under the control of the electorate and have every major capitalist player and institution made directly accountable to the people. Think of a nation’s armed forces. The military leaders are not private entrepreneurs. They are intended to serve the national good, not the private good of rich elites. All senior military officers are accountable to democratically elected officials and can be removed by them. Is that such a horrific idea? Isn’t it the rational way to operate? So why shouldn’t the nation’s “economic forces” be configured in the same way? The government will appoint the senior “generals, admirals and commanders” of the economy and all of them will be removable if they fail to perform in the national interest. Even better, these economic experts should be directly elected by their peers, qualified in economics. This would be a radically different type of capitalism. In National Socialist Germany, the capitalists were required to serve the national interest. In modern Communist China, capitalists are not permitted

to act against the interests of the State. You don’t need to have capitalism being controlled by rich, private elites always looking after No. 1. The Nazis identified two types of capitalism: predatory capitalism on the one hand and productive capitalism on the other. The former is all about speculation, casino banking, usury, making money from money, and is run by “international financiers” with no loyalty to any nation state. Capitalist globalization is the perfect expression of international finance where money goes wherever the greatest profits are to be had and the international financiers couldn’t care less about the consequences for ordinary people in any countries affected by their actions. Predatory capitalism is Stateless and decoupled from the public good and the health of the nation. Productive capitalism, on the other hand, is all about investment in the nation State for the public good (which is why it was advocated by National Socialism – here “socialism” doesn’t mean anti-capitalism, but capitalism required to serve the social good of the nation rather than the anti-social good of private elites). Hitler identified the stateless Jews as the controllers of international finance, owing no loyalty to any State. He saw predatory capitalism as the mechanism by which the Jews were able to run the world (through globalism). And bear in mind that predatory capitalism is infinitely worse today than in Hitler’s time! We now have a de facto Jewish one-world government where the rich, predatory capitalists rule everything via the “market”. This market sits above all nation states and they are all subject to it without having any control or say over it. We must all dance to the rich man’s tune. It’s precisely this shadow world government by international financiers (the puppet masters) that must be abolished once and for all. Either they are in charge or the people are in charge. Why are people so afraid of the rich? Why do they think no action can be taken against them? The rich are the Wizards of Oz. There’s nothing special about them. They’re con men. What will they do when the people pull back that curtain? They’re powerless. They’re the Emperor in his New Clothes – stark naked as soon as someone dares to point it out. Do you imagine that Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg, for all their money, can withstand seven billion people? The rich survive purely because they have beguiled so many of the poor into believing in them and their system. They

are expert psychological manipulators, but once you have seen through their games, you have nothing but contempt for them. Here’s the bottom line. You will never have a good life, and achieve all you are capable of, while the rich are in charge. It’s them or you. They must fall for you to rise. We certainly aren’t advocating rule by totalitarian systems such as National Socialism or Communism. Instead, we want democracy to be replaced by meritocracy. The basic idea of meritocracy is simple. It’s about providing everyone with an equal opportunity to shine, and those who shine the brightest – as judged by their meritocratic peers – are those who are elected to power. We end up being ruled by the smartest and wisest. All systems of privilege and inheritance are removed in order to equalize the playing field. Everyone sets out on the race of life from the same starting line. You don’t have some trust fund heir or heiress beginning the race five metres from the finishing line because their parents have bought them an unbeatable competitive advantage. Meritocracy is designed to be as fair as possible to everyone and it achieves that by ruthlessly preventing the transmission of extreme wealth between private individuals (usually from parents to their children). If your greatest desire is to inherit money earned by someone else rather than making it yourself through your own sweat and talent then you’re no meritocrat. You’re a parasite, and meritocracy has nothing to offer deadbeats and freeloaders like you. All people who accept inheritances are moochers, looters and deadheads. They know they could never succeed through their own efforts. They always need a leg up from others. These people are a joke. They would be sad losers if they weren’t propped up by their rich parents. They are spineless and worthless, the refuse and garbage of the Earth. All of these “inheritors” are terrified of a fair fight, of being deprived of an artificial advantage and genuinely having to be the best to win. They are cowards. In a fair race, they would be humiliated – and they know it! Just as a nation would wish to have its best, most meritorious generals become the leaders of its military, so a meritocratic nation seeks to get the best economists in charge of its economy. Just as generals are public servants charged with winning military victories at minimum cost to their own side, so meritocratic economic generals will be public servants and their task is to create the greatest economic victories for the people with the

fewest casualties (unlike capitalism). Being public servants, they are required to operate in the public good. The capitalist elite, by contrast, always operate in the private good (i.e. their own good). With meritocratic capitalism, there could be no such phenomenon as “globalism” whereby rich capitalists go anywhere in the world where the best profits for themselves are to be had, and show zero loyalty to their nations of birth. Any capitalist who took his money out of his country to use it elsewhere would be deemed the equivalent of a general who started using his army for his own interests or even that of a foreign power, i.e. he would be denounced as a traitor and arrested. You either sign up with the anarcho-capitalist libertarians and let the rich elites explicitly rule everything and replace government wholesale, or you sign up with the meritocrats, and meritocratic government will replace market power and rich elites wholesale. Rich dynastic elites will cease to exist in a meritocracy since it will be illegal for anyone to transfer significant assets to any other private individual. Only wealth transfers to the public (the Commonwealth) will be possible. In a meritocracy, the dead have no rights over the living and are prevented from selectively passing on their assets to their chosen ones. All the assets of the dead are transferred to the Commonwealth and meritocratically distributed in the cause of equal opportunities. No one will ever again find the game of life rigged against them by private transactions designed to favour a special few over everyone else. Well, then, what shall you choose? Should the rich, private elites be permanently in charge, or should the people rule via meritocracy? The rich elites have always been terrified of the Illuminati. They know that if we succeed, they will be out of business for good and all of their wealth will be reclaimed at death for the Commonwealth via 100% inheritance tax. It’s precisely because they fear us so much that they have gone to such lengths to demonize us through their puppets, stooges and shills such as Alex Jones, Henry Makow, Benjamin Fulford and David Icke. Icke even goes as far as to describe the Illuminati as shape-shifting lizards from another dimension. If you believe him, you’re in as much need of psychiatric help as he is. Bizarrely, the Illuminati have been branded as “the elite”, thus taking the heat away from the actual elite who are right in front of your face – all the capitalist billionaires who run the world.

The game couldn’t be simpler. Either we let the rich elite rule, or we remove their power and wealth and the people will rule … for the first time in history. Power is very straightforward. To know who’s in charge, you need do only one thing … follow the money. Only when the people control the money and the money trail leads back to the people themselves will the people be in charge. If you want the people to be in power, you must remove the wealth of the elite. It’s as blunt, basic and primordial as that. Are you for the rich elite or against them? Are you for equal opportunities or against them? You can have equal opportunities only if all economic, political and social systems of privilege, inheritance and heredity are crushed forever. 100% inheritance tax is the means by which everyone becomes their own master, dependent only on themselves. You should have zero expectation of anyone giving you hand-outs. Rich people condemn the State for providing welfare hand-outs to the poor while they themselves give hand-outs to their own children via trust funds and inheritance. You are pathetic if you accept welfare from either the State or your parents, and meritocracy is designed to get rid of State and parental welfare by making everyone stand on their own two feet and control their own destiny. Are you with us or against us? If you support what we stand for, join the Movement. Bring about a New World Order, a New Model Society, where the people are in charge and rich elites are dismantled permanently. We seek only activists – those with true hero potential. If you don’t have it in you, don’t delude yourself. Stay at home and play your video games. Remember, we’re not a debating society. This is about activism only. If you’re not willing to get involved in doing things, stay away. The world will change because talented people will come forward and change it. These people will write, create, preach, convert, inspire, act, perform wonders, and through the sheer force of their will and talent, the world will bend before them. Meritocrats are achievers. That’s what defines them. So, if you can achieve something glorious, welcome on board. Given that we are meritocrats and revere talent and achievement above all things, we will give you the chance to demonstrate your merit. We will monitor social media, and highlight on our website the efforts of anyone who is committed to

genuine activism and is getting the Movement’s message out there. It’s not about us, it’s about you. It always has been. What is the purpose of our activism? It’s to wake up the sleeping, sedated masses by exposing the fraud of democracy. It’s to end the spell of false consciousness that the rich elite have cast over the masses. It’s to bring an end to predatory, rapacious capitalism, capitalist globalism and international finance. These will be replaced by productive capitalism run by publicly elected and accountable experts working for the public good. Large-scale global capital will end. There will be no multinational, global corporate leviathans dictating to nation States and avoiding paying tax. Capitalism will be small-scale (think Small Is Beautiful: A Study of Economics As If People Mattered by E. F. Schumacher), and never greater than the nation State, whose interests it must serve rather than the private interests of super rich capitalists. Everyone in the world must decide where they stand. Do you support the public or private good? Are you for or against inheritance? Are you for or against privilege (the opportunity afforded to the rich to buy competitive advantages over everyone else, particularly in respect of an elite private education for their children)? Are you a meritocrat or democrat? Are you for predatory capitalism (free-market capitalism) or productive capitalism (controlled by the nation State)? Are you for capitalist globalism or for the right of governments to be in charge rather than markets? Are you for positive or negative liberty? Are you for the General Will of the people or the particular will of the individual? Are you for nations being genuinely run by their people or by rich, unelected, unaccountable private elites? Do you admire the rich elites or despise them? Do you think that the rich and powerful should be in charge and that they are great Randian heroes? Do you support extreme private wealth and having a small group of super rich people owning the bulk of our world? Should Wall Street or Main Street run the world? Should the 1% rule or the 99%? Are you a libertarian? Are you an anarchist? Are you a communist? Are you a fascist? Make up your mind. Choose your side. Take action. Why do most movements for change fail? It’s because their participants have no clear idea of what they stand for and what they really want. Enormous numbers of people with different agendas come together and then of course are unable to formulate a common way forward. They squabble and bicker and find that they have only one thing in common – the

desire for something “better” than they have now. Yet they have no united vision of what this better thing will be, so each movement collapses under its own contradictions and internal tensions. And the rich elites just laugh and keep getting richer. They know they are invulnerable as long as the masses cannot agree, and they have taken great care to divide the masses as much as possible. There’s only one real game in town – the rich elites versus the people. Who should rule? We have presented our vision of what should replace rule by the rich elites – meritocratic rule by the people. You will be either for us or against us. In your heart of hearts, you will be either a supporter of the rich elites (as Ayn Rand’s libertarians are), or want them removed from our world forever and power entrusted to the people, a principle that will be enshrined in the Constitution itself. One measure crystallizes the entire debate – 100% inheritance tax (including the prevention of any attempts to evade this tax through trust funds or anything else). 100% inheritance tax reboots the world by destroying the wealth of dynastic families. The mentality of the world will change beyond recognition when people realize that they will never inherit a single cent from anyone else and that their success in life is their own business and no one else’s. At the moment, everyone who doesn’t have an effective network of nepotism and cronyism has no chance in life. Only when nepotism and cronyism are destroyed will the people of the highest merit – from any background – succeed. So, above all else, the Movement must campaign for 100% inheritance tax. As a transitional measure, it might be tactically advantageous to apply 100% inheritance tax only to estates over, say, half a million dollars. But, in the end, meritocracy is defined by 100% inheritance tax across the board. That’s the only way to guarantee equal opportunities for all. The rich are welcome to spend all of their money on luxuries for themselves. Anything not spent by the time of death goes to the Commonwealth to be invested in the public good. What could be simpler, nobler, fairer or more moral? We already know that many, many people despise 100% inheritance tax. To all those people, we say this ... whether you think so or not, you are opposed to the public good, you are for the private elites, you support nepotism and cronyism, you are against equal opportunities and meritocracy. So, why don’t you man up and take responsibility for your pernicious beliefs? Declare yourself anti-meritocratic. Say that you agree

that deadbeats like Paris Hilton should be allowed to inherit vast fortunes despite having done nothing to earn them. Say that you revere bloodlines over justice, fairness and merit. Say you support privilege. Don’t pretend to be something you’re not. Don’t live in bad faith. Don’t pretend to be moral and interested in the good of others. Confess that you are a libertarian egoist. Admit that you hate government in principle and resent even one cent of taxation. Grow a spine and tell the world that you hate it and all your love is directed towards yourself, your family, your cronies and your God ... and everyone else can go screw themselves. Know thyself, said the ancient Greeks. So, know who you are and what you really stand for, not what you fondly imagine you stand for. Choose your sides. 100% inheritance tax is the single tax that defines what side you’re truly on. You can’t fake support for this tax. You either agree with it or you don’t. You either want the meritocratic people to be in charge or the privileged elites that will use their money at every turn to anti-meritocratically buy competitive advantages for them and theirs. Inheritance is never anything other than an unearned competitive advantage. That’s all it can ever be. If you’re for inheritance, you’re for privilege and against merit. That’s the inescapable bottom line. There’s no conceivable meritocratic defence for inheritance. It’s obscene that a nation such as America that worships inheritance and privilege should imagine that it is in any way meritocratic. America is a shameless, anti-meritocratic plutocracy where you have close to zero chance of succeeding in life if you don’t come from a privileged family and no competitive advantage has been purchased for you by your parents. The “great American novel” – The Great Gatsby – is all about how an outsider, no matter how ostensibly successful, will never be accepted by the elite and will always be destroyed by the elite. The world divides into two types of people – those who support the public good and those who support the private good. The former have a positive attitude towards the concept of community, society, government and the State. If government is failing disastrously, it’s not because there’s an inherent problem with government but rather with those who typically form the government – who are usually advocates of the private good and out to feather their own nests.

Those who support the private good are opposed to community, society, government and the State. The monstrous UK prime minister Margaret Thatcher (who proclaimed, “There is no such thing as society”) was someone who hated the State and wanted to destroy it. The British rich prospered to an astonishing degree under her rule. Plainly, a government led by someone such as Thatcher is not advancing the public good one iota. For Thatcher and all supporters of the private good, there are only individuals and families, and government should stay out of their lives as much as possible. Minimal state intervention is known as “negative liberty” while significant State intervention is known as “positive liberty”. Meritocracy is a positive liberty system since it actively seeks to destroy the power of private elites and dynastic families that promote nepotism and cronyism. People such as anarchists, libertarians, conservatives and free-market capitalists are advocates of the private good over the public good and are proponents of negative liberty. In short, all authentic left wingers support the public good and all right wingers the private good (hence rule by rich private elites and dynastic families). Centrists are clueless compromisers. All democratic nations have at least two main political parties, one broadly left wing and one broadly right wing. In America, the Democrats are nominally on the left (but are actually centrists), the Republicans are on the right and the libertarians on the far right. America has barely had any meaningful contact with true left wing politics. That might have been very different had the great Illuminatus Thomas Jefferson – a radical Jacobin – enjoyed unchallenged power in America. America would now be a left wing meritocracy devoted to the public good and reflecting the values of Plato’s Republic and Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Social Contract. Tragically, Jefferson’s time as President largely went to waste as the powerful American elites that, in practical terms, actually ran the nation, chose instead to deify the private good and particular will over the public good and General Will. America has been ruled by a rich elite ever since, and it makes not one jot of a difference if the Democrats or Republicans are in power. America, instinctively, is extremely right wing, libertarian and religiously fundamentalist. It’s full of rampant egoism, narcissism and the cult of the individual who fears only his “God”. America is the champion of unfettered capitalism, and capitalism is the economic system of the private

good (rule by rich elites). No country on Earth is more in need of a revolution than America. It has the greatest degree of false consciousness to be found anywhere. It’s even worse than Islamic countries! The “American Dream” is one of the most insidious delusions of all time. America is a WASP plutocracy being ruled from Washington D.C., the heart of WASP power. America is a Judaeo-Masonic unholy alliance of Washington D.C. political power and Wall Street financial power. The Wall Street Jews and the WASP Freemasons of Washington D.C. are the true axis of evil in our world. From them came the gospel of capitalist globalization that is ruining all of our lives, and ensuring that only the rich can have power. The WASPs and the Jews are united in their slavish devotion to the family, to nepotism, cronyism and privilege. They are religious zealots. The Jews are extremist Zionists who believe they are the “Chosen People”, and the WASP Masons are extremist Protestants who believe themselves the elect and the saved. They think they have a divine right to rule and that civilization would collapse without them. It’s up to the rest of us to show them that we – pagans and heathens – are the divine ones and to cast down their false Gods and idols, their Abrahamic devils and demons. Jesus and Zion must fall.

The Banner If you’re holding a banner proclaiming 100% inheritance tax, there can be no doubt that you are calling for the end of dynastic, privileged elites. Nothing could be more horrific to the elite than the notion that they will not be able to pass on their vast wealth to their chosen ones and that it will instead, at their deaths, be transferred to the Commonwealth to serve the public good. The Meritocracy Movement is all about abolishing the elite and letting them know without any ambiguity that the world wants them abolished and that they are despised and reviled. The banner of 100% inheritance tax declares exactly that. Meritocrats must refuse to vote for any political party that does not subscribe to 100% inheritance tax. The Hour of Decision has come. We either get rid of the elite, as billions claim to want to do but seem to do nothing to actually bring about, or we

admit that we are “last men” – pathetic cowards who will never do anything. In which case, we should stop our pointless moaning and whining. You have no right to complain if you’re not willing to act, if you do nothing to get rid of that which you’re complaining about.

Who Will Do It? “If not us, then who? If not now, then when? Will there be a better day for it tomorrow or next year? Will it be less dangerous then? Will someone else’s children have to risk their lives instead of us risking ours?” – John Lewis, Civil Rights Activist

Anti-Nature Inheritance of parental assets is the least natural thing of all. In the animal world, the only things offspring inherit from their parents are their genes. Everything else is up to them. That’s exactly how it should be in the human world. No one anywhere should receive preferential treatment because of assets accumulated by their parents. In Nature, if a “rich” lion dies, all of its “riches” are left behind. They are not passed on to the lion’s offspring. Any strong creature can come along and take the lion’s former riches. The laws of asset inheritance are the least natural laws of all time and represent nothing but decadence and degeneration. They are the means for the dead to control the living by selectively passing on acquired advantages to “chosen ones”. Nature – outside the human sphere – accords the dead no rights at all. As soon as you die, you are no longer a player in the game of life, and you have zero ability to influence the living via your former wealth. This is how it must be in the human sphere too. The assets of the dead must automatically go to the Commonwealth, not to the “particular” wealth, the “private” wealth, of a few lucky inheritors. There’s an absurd idea that the concept of meritocracy was invented in Britain in the 1950s. “Meritocracy” is simply a rebranding of the ancient Greek word “aristocracy”, meaning “rule by the best; the most fitting” and is as old as Pythagoras and Plato. In history, “aristocracy” became hopelessly contaminated with another concept – “plutocracy”, rule by the rich. That is, the richest people proclaimed to the world that they were also the best people, and thus the word “aristocracy” came to be associated with financial wealth, something wholly rejected by Pythagoras and Plato.

Today, the same thing is happening with “meritocracy”. When Americans use this word, they are in fact linking it to its opposite (extreme privilege), i.e. they are saying that the “best” people are those who have had overwhelming competitive advantage conferred on them by virtue of having rich families. The American privileged elite have nothing to do with merit. The “best”, the most talented, are those who, in a completely unrigged race, run the fastest. If you have won because the race was bought for you by your parents then you haven’t demonstrated any merit whatsoever. There is no meritocratic nation on Earth. A meritocracy can exist only where there is zero inheritance of wealth, so that no one can buy (or have bought for them) an artificial, anti-meritocratic advantage. What Pythagoras and Plato had in mind when they talked of aristocracy was rule by the wisest, the smartest, the philosopher kings who had the greatest knowledge and understanding of the fundamental operations of existence itself. The last thing they had in mind was rule by greedy, selfish, psychopathic rich folk who would even trample over their own mothers for profit. Aristocracy/meritocracy is about rule by those who most value education and reason. It has no connection with wealth. In fact, private wealth for the leaders of society was explicitly prohibited by Pythagoras and Plato. The leaders had to live in communes without any private property at all. Their task was to serve the General Will, not their own particular wills. You are caught in an immediate and fatal conflict of interest if you are seeking to make yourself rich while supposedly ruling in the interests of all. Leaders – true leaders – are devoted to the public good, not their own private good. They serve because it’s the greatest honour to do so, not because they can become stinking rich off the back of it. It’s obscene when aristocracy and meritocracy are linked to capitalism and the accumulation of excessive wealth, which is then passed on dynastically. This is the direct opposite of aristocracy and meritocracy. America is a hyper-privileged, right wing capitalist plutocracy. It has no connection at all with a meritocracy, which is always left wing because it serves the public good and General Will and explicitly destroys privilege wherever it finds it. America has become astoundingly anti-meritocratic. It’s an insult to its Founding Fathers, an inversion of their ideals of a just, meritorious Republic. America has just about the least social mobility on Earth. In

countries such as America and Britain, your future is almost wholly determined by what address your parents live at, i.e. whether they live in a rich, privileged neighbourhood or a poor, deprived neighbourhood. If you come from the nice side of the tracks, it’s almost impossible to fail. If you come from the wrong side of the tracks, it’s almost impossible to succeed. That’s the stark fact. Meritocracy is a staggeringly poorly understood concept. Many leftwingers despise it because they think it is all about allowing a few talented people to trample over everyone else, and to justify their dictatorship on the basis that they are the demonstrable “best”. In fact, the best way to think of meritocracy is as a 100 metres race. In an Olympic final of this race, there will often be only a couple of metres between first and last. In a capitalist version of this race, the winner takes all. He gets vast rewards and all the other runners vanish into oblivion. That, sadly, is what many people think a meritocracy delivers. In fact, a meritocracy says that everyone should be paid what they merit. So, a runner who finishes two metres behind the winner in a meritocratic 100 metres race should get 98% percent of whatever financial rewards the winner gets. Thus, there are staggeringly small differences between what winners and losers earn in a true meritocracy. It’s basically a system of great equality, with a few marginal winners and a few marginal losers. The winners get intangible rewards – glory, acclaim, admiration, and so on. That should always be sufficient for a meritocrat, but it’s never good enough for a plutocrat who always wants a wholly disproportionate reward for what he has achieved. He wants the glory and the money. Such people are fundamentally anti-meritocratic because they want a reward that is not at all proportionate to what they authentically merit. If you win a race by 0.001 seconds, why should you earn a thousand times more than the person you defeated? There’s no correspondence between the size of your victory (your objective merit) and the size of your reward. It’s precisely this “winner’s premium” that plutocracy magnifies to an obscene degree. Look at European football teams. You can have one team where the players are paid an average of £100,000 per week being defeated by another team where the players are paid just £1000 per week. This is possible only because the players in the rich team are only marginally better than the players in the poor team, and if the players in the poor team are having a

good day while the players in the rich team are having an off day then the poor team can win. So, the marginally better players of the rich team are receiving excessive rewards that bear no resemblance to their objective extra merit over the players of the poor team. We see this phenomenon throughout free-market capitalism. Tiny differences in relative merit can result – at the top of society – in enormous pay differentials. Such differentials, it can’t be stressed enough, are wholly unmeritocratic. They have not been earned. They have been legally “stolen” – because plutocracy is all about giving the leaders of society the legal right to reward themselves to excess ... and that’s exactly what they have done to the utmost degree possible without causing a revolution. But, as ever, they have overplayed their hand. The righteous Revolution is here at last. Consider how the ancient Greek Olympians did things: “The olive wreath also known as kotinos, was the prize for the winner at the ancient Olympic Games. It was an olive branch, of the wild-olive tree that grew at Olympia, intertwined to form a circle or a horse-shoe. According to Pausanias it was introduced by Heracles as a prize for the running race winner to honour his father Zeus. In the ancient Olympic Games there were no gold, silver, or bronze medals. There was only one winner per event, crowned with an olive wreath made of wild-olive leaves from a sacred tree near the temple of Zeus at Olympia. ... “Herodotus describes the following story which is relevant to the olive wreath. Xerxes was interrogating some Arcadians after the Battle of Thermopylae. He inquired why there were so few Greek men defending the Thermopylae. The answer was ‘All other men are participating in the Olympic Games’. And when asked. ‘What is the prize for the winner?’, ‘An olive-wreath’ came the answer. Then Tigranes, one of his generals uttered a most noble saying: ‘Good heavens! Mardonius, what kind of men are these against whom you have brought us to fight? Men who do not compete for possessions, but for virtue.’” – Wikipedia Plutocracies are all about possessions and inheritance while meritocracies are all about virtue and equal opportunities. Which system you prefer reveals everything about your character (or lack thereof).

The Question

Imagine that you had to defend an old man with a beard charged with murder in the first degree for cutting his young son’s throat and then burning his body (in a “holocaust”) because a voice in his head identifying itself as “God” ordered him to. You would certainly plead insanity on behalf of your client, wouldn’t you? Tragically, half the people of the world think the bearded old man (Abraham) who was in the act of carrying out this atrocity was fully sane, utterly moral and one of the greatest human beings of all time! These lunatics even call themselves “Abrahamists”. They are the Jews, the Christians and the Muslims. How dare these evil, deranged people claim to have any connection with God!

The Abortion How much trouble would the world have been spared if the “Virgin Mary” had had an abortion! ... or if she had been stoned to death by her fellow Jews for fornicating with her “God” and getting herself knocked up (unprotected sex outside marriage – for shame!)? So, the only “defence” in ancient Judea for getting pregnant outside marriage was to claim that God fucked you, which makes it OK, obviously. But, hey, doesn’t God believe in marriage?! According to God himself, aren’t you supposed to put a ring on the little lady’s finger before you screw her? One law for him and one law for everyone else, it seems. And to think that billions of credulous, gullible morons believe this greatest whopper of all time!

The Divine Murderer A Syrian woman who said that she had paid five thousand dollars for a nightmarish, “suicidal” journey across the Mediterranean to Europe said she survived only thanks to the “Will of Allah”. Well, that means that the many thousands who regularly die on the same journey have been deliberately killed by the Will of Allah. What a monster! You see, that’s the problem with theistic religions. If God is directly intervening to save some people, it means that, either, he is doing nothing when other people die, or actively murdering them, and that means he’s utterly immoral. If God intervenes, why doesn’t he intervene all the time?

Reverse Psychology

So, what would our rich elite enemies and their fellow travellers say about our plans? These are the sorts of things they typically say to us: 1) My parents don’t work hard so that the State can steal their money when they die. 2) The State won’t get a cent. Over my dead body. 3) Your problems aren’t our problems. 4) No taxation. You’re not getting any of my money, thieves. 5) Fuck the State. Fuck the poor. They’re poor because they’re feckless, lazy and stupid, and they deserve everything they get. 6) Children born to poor parents deserve a shit life. Did not God say that the sins of the fathers shall be visited on their sons? 7) The State is full of looters and moochers, people who take, take and take, and never give. 8) Why should we give money to poor people who will just spend it on smokes, crack and booze? 9) The government screws up everything. Let the markets run everything. 10) Liberty! No one’s going to tell us what to do with our money. 11) We’ll spill the blood of tyrants. We are patriots. We’re the backbone of the country. 12) This is a Darwinian world. Survival isn’t compulsory. If you can’t stand the heat, too bad. 13) I’d do anything for my family. 14) Of course I want to give my kids an advantage. Who doesn’t? Is there something fucking wrong with you? 15) The rich deserve their money. They earned it. The State shouldn’t get a cent. 16) Without the rich elite, the world would descend into chaos. We can’t do without them. They’re the wealth creators. They’re much smarter and harder working than everyone else.

17) The rich elite are God’s elect, the saved. They’re rich because God made them rich. 18) The State is Godless. We don’t want the State getting our money. We don’t want a cent spent on deadbeats. We ought to have Poor Houses and Work Houses run by charities where we can send all the scum. In fact, why not concentration camps? 19) The Big State is Communism in disguise. 20) Faith, family and flag. That’s all that counts. Fuck the State. 21) The State wants to take my guns. From my cold, dead hands! 22) What’s wrong with rigging the race? Isn’t that what everyone would do if they got the chance? 23) Kill the poor. They’re just a drain on resources. What do they contribute? Nothing. 24) Don’t give the poor anything. Let them starve. The world’s better off without them. 25) What’s wrong with the rich owning half the world? That’s capitalism – the best system the world has ever produced. 26) Markets are much more efficient than governments. You can’t buck the market. 27) There’s no such thing as society. 28) You’re a fucking communist. You’re not getting my money or my parents’ money. You and what army are going to take it from me? 29) I don’t give a fig for the rest of the world. They can look after themselves. 30) If you can’t afford health insurance, die, you bum! 31) I’m sick of fucking do-gooders. 32) Don’t ever dare tell me what to do. I’ll do whatever I want. I was born free and no commie is ever going to dictate to me. 33) I’m only accountable to God, not to the State or anyone else.

34) My rights come from God, not from the State. 35) It’s my natural, God-given right to inherit my parents’ wealth. 36) Screw the poor. 37) Trample the poor. Use them for dog food. 38) Exterminate the poor. The world would be 100% improved overnight. 39) I love Ayn Rand and Ronald Reagan. 40) I am John Galt. (I am not an asshole!)

Galt versus Plato You have to decide whether you want the world to be run by Ayn Rand’s fictional superhero John Galt (standing for business, wealth, the privileged elite, and getting rid of government and replacing it with unelected, unaccountable markets) or by Plato (standing for intelligence, reason, fairness, justice, morality, merit and getting rid of unaccountable markets and replacing them with accountable government). John Galt or Plato ... businessmen or the intelligentsia, the privileged or the meritocratic, the rich or the people, the private or the public, the particular or the general. Which side are you on? The history of the world is the history of rule by rich elites in various guises. The world has never been ruled by smart people (meritocrats). If you want change, the only meaningful change is for the rich to be overthrown and replaced by meritocrats. The Star Trek TV series shows what a meritocratic future looks like. There are no rich elites in Star Trek. Capitalism doesn’t exist. John Galt will never take us to other galaxies. Smart people will. Rich people serving themselves or smart people serving everyone... who’s best for our world? You decide. Should money or reason rule the world? If money, we will always be ruled by the rich elites, serving their own interests, not ours. If reason, money will be downgraded, the rich elites will be abolished and humanity will rationally plan paradise for itself, for everyone. What’s it to be? Are you a supporter of the rich and powerful or of the smart and talented? You can’t say, as the Occupy movement did, “We want to get rid of the rich elite, but we have no idea what to put in their place – and we all

disagree about what comes next.” That can accomplish nothing, and indeed did accomplish nothing. You have to say something crystal clear, namely, “We don’t want to be ruled by the privileged rich out for themselves, we want to be ruled by the meritocratic smart, out for everyone.” Ultimately, the choice is between irrational markets governing our lives, or the rational minds of the world’s smartest people. Hitherto, the richest people – the beneficiaries of markets – have been worshipped, and the smartest people – the geniuses who have truly transformed our world – have been reviled. To many people, intelligence is obnoxious. As Nietzsche said, “Arrogance on the part of the meritorious is even more offensive to us than the arrogance of those without merit: for merit itself is offensive.” That’s the truth of it. Wealth is admired and revered and merit feared and loathed. The world will never change until this basic formula changes. All stupid people can dream about becoming rich (even though they never will be). They cannot dream about being smart (and they never will be). You can win a lottery and become rich; you can’t have an intelligence transplant or upgrade. Wealth feeds into Mythos, merit into Logos. We live in a Mythos world where the rich are ersatz Gods. We need to live in a Logos world where geniuses are the most admired and respected of us. Humanity needs a new dream – of the rational project to build heaven on earth. The old dream of “me, me, me getting rich, rich, rich” is decrepit, infantile and has demonstrably failed for all but the 1% who have never had it so good – at our expense. The old Gods are dead. Long live the new Gods.

Predistribution “Predistribution is the idea that the state should try to prevent inequalities occurring in the first place rather than ameliorating inequalities through the tax and benefits system once they have occurred as occurs under redistribution.” – Wikipedia Meritocracy is both redistributive (in the short term) and predistributive (in the long term). 100% inheritance tax (including a block on all attempts to circumvent it) will redistribute the extreme wealth of the super rich to the people, and on an ongoing basis rational laws will be implemented to make it unnecessary for redistribution ever to be needed again since the world will never again be so unequal.

The central doctrine of free-market capitalism is that private individuals operating in their own ruthless, private, selfish interests are the right people to determine the economic health of a nation. Upon these individuals, the livelihoods of everyone else should depend, supposedly. Can any rational person consider this sane? The financial meltdown of 2008 when capitalism itself went bankrupt and had to be bailed out by socialism proves once and for all that it’s lunacy to allow the personal greed of a few bankers, traders, politicians, and CEOs to rule our lives. Never again should our economic destiny be placed in the hands of the private sector. The economic well-being of nation must be under direct control of its people with every senior official elected by the people, accountable to the people, and dismissible and prosecutable by the people in the case of incompetence, recklessness or pursuit of naked self-interest and greed. The defining question of the future will be who should run the global economy – unelected, unaccountable private banks, stock markets and corporations, or elected governments serving the interests of their people? Should the global economy be under private or public control? This is the difference between “free-market” capitalism and “social” capitalism. Capitalism must serve the public good, not be about enriching a tiny elite. Ask yourself a very simple question. Do you want your job and career prospects to be in the hands of private individuals – functional psychopaths and sociopaths! – who will do anything to enrich themselves with no consideration for others? Or do you want your fate to be in the hands of a rational, elected, meritocratic government charged with serving the public good and with guaranteeing you an equal opportunity in life? Why is there even a need for a debate? Only the deranged would wish a private elite to control the public arena. It’s testimony to the effectiveness of the propaganda of the elite that they have suckered billions into believing that private is best. Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged is the Bible of this demented ideology, and proclaims that selfishness is “virtuous”! “Greed is good” is literally the principle by which the private elite rule us. Do you agree with them?

Two Masters You cannot have two masters. You cannot have a private and public master. The private elite of the super rich made themselves the true master via the “free markets” – which they rigged and dominated – but they ingeniously

created the illusion of democracy to dupe the public into thinking they were the true master. If – as a member of the public – you are the true master then you will know it ... because you will be in charge of your own destiny. You know for a fact that you are not the master of your own fate if people and things over which you have not one jot of influence are entirely determining your life. Well, ask yourself the simplest question – are you the master of your own life, or are you the slave of the decisions of others? 99% of the world are slaves. Isn’t it time they changed the channel? The world can be ruled by unelected, unaccountable private elites or by elected, accountable meritocrats. What’s it to be? Will you be ruled by irrational “free-market” economics serving the private good, or rational, planned economics serving the public good? Your choice. Ayn Rand (standing for markets controlled by rich elites) or Plato (standing for wise meritocrats ruling justly for all) – whom will you choose? The objective of the Revolution could not be clearer – the complete annihilation of private power over the public sphere. This is the sine qua non of the Revolution. This means the end of free-market capitalism run by unelected, unaccountable elites and its replacement with social capitalism by elected, accountable meritocrats. If you do not agree with this, you are a Counter Revolutionary, a conservative and reactionary, whose sympathies lie with the private elites. You yourself are therefore an enemy of the people. The Occupy Movement failed because it did not have a stated objective, hence was all things to all men. The Occupy Movement was a mixture of extreme right wing libertarians calling for the end of government and its replacement by markets, of left wing anarchists who wanted to destroy the State, of New Age hippie dreamers, of socialists, left wing reformers, dogooders and moralists – a catastrophic alliance of incompatibles. A movement can succeed only if everyone in it agrees with one objective. Our objective is crystal clear – the removal of the power of private, rich elites forever, and that means the removal of all of their assets when they die, via 100% inheritance tax. The Revolution is about the overthrow of irrational free-market capitalism (that delivers a super rich elite and catastrophic cycles of boom and bust), and putting in its place

meritocratic, rational capitalism controlled by elected, accountable economic geniuses serving the public (and where boom and bust is ended for good). We are not arguing for the end of capitalism but for the end of the capitalism that stands outside the control of the people. If the people are not in charge of capitalism then they are its slaves ... the slaves of the private elites who currently control capitalism. This is the Revolution of the Second Enlightenment. The First Enlightenment eroded the power of popes, priests, monarchs and nobles. The Second Enlightenment will destroy the power of the private elites and the religious and media propaganda they have used to construct a false consciousness in the minds of the people. Join the Enlightenment War, the Revolution that will decide humanity’s future. To learn more about the Revolutionary Manifesto for an entirely new humanity, see the samizdat ebooks by Adam Weishaupt, Michael Faust and Mike Hockney (especially the God Series). The Last Bling King by Mike Hockney is the Illuminati’s reply to Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged. The Armageddon Conspiracy by Mike Hockney is about an ancient plot to kill the Abrahamic God. Which side are you on? Are you with the Illuminati and on the side of a wholly transformed humanity, or with Rand and the forces of the super rich, reaction, conservatism and counter-revolution? The time has come to make up your mind. What is your sacred cause? If you don’t choose then you are one of the Ignavi – those who are so despised that they are rejected by heaven and hell alike. “[Politicians exist] solely to protect the interests of the rich and powerful. They’re not there for you.” – Russell Brand Wake up! Wake up! Wake up! Wake up! Wake up! Wake up! Wake up! Wake up! Wake up! Wake up! Wake up! Wake up! Wake up! This is not a rehearsal. This is your life. Take control of it. Destroy the rich elite. You have failed to understand a single thing about reality if you have not grasped that the rich are what stand between you and an equal chance in life. It’s the rich versus the people. It’s them or us. The ancient Athenian people introduced democracy – “people power” – to defeat the rich oligarchs of their time. Now the rich oligarchs have worked out how to

circumvent democracy with “the market”, which is unelected and unaccountable to the people. The rich tolerate democracy precisely because it has zero power over them. The Bilderberg Group couldn’t care less what the people think about anything at all. Yet the Bilderberg Group are just a bunch of fat, irrelevant old men. They’re dinosaurs who haven’t received the email telling them they’re extinct. They’re the undead. They’re a decrepit convocation of wizards – the Wizards of Oz. It’s time we called their bluff.

The Lost Dream All young people dream of the life they think they will soon have. Instead, they’re enduring a nightmare. Their expectations have been raised sky high, but governments aren’t delivering. Why not? Because the powers-that-be have a wholly different set of priorities – enriching themselves and grabbing as much for themselves as they can while the going’s good. The gap between what people want from life and what it’s actually delivering for most people is growing wider and wider. It’s becoming a chasm – and that spells the end for the ruling elite. America likes to think of itself as a classless, meritocratic society, yet it now lags behind fossilized Europe in terms of inequality and social mobility. Britain is the least socially mobile part of Europe – and most like America! The Pew Economic Mobility Project shows that American children from a rich background without a college degree are 2.5 times more likely to end up rich than children from a poor background with a degree. Well, that’s American “meritocracy” for you – what everyone else calls privilege, nepotism and cronyism. It’s extremely hard to rise in America, and even harder to fall, i.e. the rich don’t like any outsiders entering their charmed circle, and they don’t let any of their own kind fall out. And it’s getting worse. Inequality is breeding more inequality. The rich are marrying each other – just as medieval European aristocratic families once did. They’re breeding all-powerful hereditary dynasties – and we’re letting them get away with it. In Canada, 70 percent of the sons of Canada’s top 1 percent have worked where their fathers worked. No problems for them in getting work experience and good, lucrative jobs.

Education has become the latest capitalist trick. They tell you that a degree is the way out. It’s not. It’s yet another delusion. All the best jobs are reserved for the privileged elite. If you want a chance, you have to destroy privilege and replace it with a genuine meritocracy where there’s no such thing as an entrenched super rich elite dictating to everyone else. What do young people want? They want fairness, an equal chance, a more equal form of capitalism, higher quality cities and homes, more freedom to express their true selves, better education, better jobs and careers. And what’s wrong with that? Nothing at all. What’s preventing them from getting it? Their own governments that are instead serving the needs of the rich elites that control the political process and have bought their puppet democratic “leaders” lock, stock and barrel. The protests aren’t going away. They keep bubbling up all over the world, and one day soon they’re going to explode everywhere at once. The commentators, pundits and propagandists of the Old World Order keep pronouncing the global unrest dead. But it isn’t. These fools don’t realize their world has already fallen. They are Dead Man walking. Just before the French Revolution, the French aristocrats thought they had never had it so good. They ignored all the signs of impending catastrophe, but it was delivered soon enough. Today’s elite are equally blind. They haven’t grasped that they have lost the trust and respect of the people. If they had any intelligence at all, they would be appearing in sackcloths, begging for forgiveness and giving away most of their wealth to the people. But the elite are always too stupid for that. Tick, tock!

The Phoney War The Cold War was presented as a great battle between Western freedom and Eastern tyranny. It was nothing of the kind. It was actually the struggle between two brutal elites: the totalitarian elite of the Soviet Communist Party who thought they had to control every aspect of their people’s lives to keep them in check, and the capitalist elite who had worked out how to make “freedom” profitable via the sham choices of capitalist consumerism. Both elites were all about control and the maintenance of their own power, but one did so through repression and the other through deception. They were as bad as each other.

Communism’s death knell in 1989 was presented as a demonstration that people prized individual capitalist “freedom” over communism. With the left wing ideology shattered, the world took an almighty lurch to the right. No longer concerned about having to offer any sops to left wingers, the right wingers did what they’d always wanted to do. They shouted at the top of their voices, “Greed is good; selfishness is virtuous; money talks and the more money you have the more you’re heard (and if you have no money, you’re voiceless and invisible).” The shackles were off. A huge transfer of wealth took place from ordinary people to the elite. Where CEOs were once paid about fifteen to fifty times what their average employees were paid, they started to be paid hundreds and even thousands of times more. Anyone who could started paying themselves a fortune. Those who couldn’t kept having their pay cut. Well, that’s free-market capitalism for you. That’s “market forces”. The Communist Party was once associated with cronyism, repression, and anti-freedom. Now the capitalist elite are exposed as the supreme advocates of cronyism, nepotism, privilege, repression and anti-freedom. They’re just cleverer about how they conceal their agenda. The only freedom they truly offer is the freedom to buy their consumer goods and make them even richer – and that’s no freedom at all. Protest about it and they send in their repressive police, just like the Soviets. As George Orwell said in Animal Farm regarding the humans (the capitalists) and the pigs (the communists), “The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.” Communism died in 1989. Free-market capitalism died in 2008 when it became insolvent and had to be bailed out by socialist means. The communist and capitalist elites were as vile and self-interested as each other. They had no interest in their respective people. Being free to go shopping is not what freedom means. People crave true freedom – to shape their own lives and control their own destiny. That is the most basic human right, and neither communism nor free-market capitalism delivered it. Meritocracy will. That’s what it’s designed for.

Merit versus Political Patronage We live in a world where politics isn’t controlled by merit but by political patronage. Politicians are approved by the rich, appointed by the rich and

play the rich man’s game. Can you remember the last time any politician ever took on the rich and acted against the interests of the rich? It has become impossible to conceive of such a thing. The political process itself is farcical. It’s an exercise in superficiality, trivia and platitudinous soundbites. There’s no intellectual content. All introverts are ruled out of politics because it has been turned into a circus of extraversion, with every politician having to shake hands, kiss babies, manically pursue photo opportunities, please the media, and avoid saying anything that might be construed as a serious, intelligent opinion rather than dumbed down, lowest common denominator party-political rhetoric.

The Final Conflict The Final War has come, the War to end all Wars. This was the War that could never be avoided because it is in fact the war to define what it means to be human and to determine the future of humanity. It’s nothing less than the Battle of Armageddon for the human soul!

The Platonic Soul Plato divided the soul into three components: reason (intellect; head), spirit (courage; heart) and desire (appetite; gut). Reason is the immortal part of the soul. Spirit and desire are mortal and die with the body. The more rational you are, the more divine you are. Humanity has hitherto been run according to spirit and courage (military power; might is right) and appetite (desire for sex, food, drink, luxury, wealth, power, entertainment, sensory pleasure, safety, security, to be with God in heaven and to avoid hell). Monarchies, dictatorships and theocracies have always been backed up by military power. In today’s world, capitalism is the economic means for satisfying primitive appetites and desires, and those who are best at appealing to our base, animal aspects have become extremely rich and now rule over us like medieval kings and popes. It’s no mistake that capitalism has zero intellectual content. Is it even possible to conceive of an intellectual capitalist? In a 100% capitalist world, reason would be completely dead. Reason serves no capitalist purpose. Adverts deliberately bypass the rational mind and go straight to the most primitive part of the brain concerned with basic desire. If humanity remains locked into spirit and appetite, it will be forever bestial. The future of humanity is to become guided by reason rather than

animal desire. Humanity will undergo a split. Higher Humanity (Logos Humanity) will be Platonic, advocating the spread of rational enlightenment. Lower Humanity (Mythos Humanity) will remain trapped in the prison of the senses and feelings, of religious faith and delusion, of capitalist consumption and anti-intellectualism. It is Lower Humanity – the overwhelming majority of the human race – that buys into capitalism and worships the rich elite. Higher Humanity can no longer pretend to like and tolerate Lower Humanity. A formal divorce must take place and Humanity must split in two – the Platonic immortals dedicated to reason, and the Bestial mortals devoted to satisfying their base desires. Higher Humanity is humanity’s future. Lower Humanity is humanity’s animal aspect that will be shed in due course and become extinct. Only via reason can we become Gods. Rational people don’t get on their knees and worship Gods; they stand up straight and become Gods themselves. Are you one of the slaves of the Abrahamic “God” – or do you reject that monster, that Torture God, entirely? You will have no God except yourself. Paul MacLean’s triune model of the brain perfectly complements Plato’s view of the soul. MacLean said we have a primitive Reptilian brain at the centre of our brain, dealing with basic survival functions and reproduction. It’s all about food, fighting, fleeing (when necessary) and fucking. Upon this was built the mammalian limbic system which gives us our feelings. Finally came the neocortex which gave us our reason. So, the Reptilian brain reflects Plato’s lowest part of the soul dealing with desire, will and appetites. The limbic system reflects Plato’s middle part of the soul of spirit, feelings and courage, and the neocortex reflects Plato’s highest part of the soul – reason. Capitalism is dictated by the Reptilian brain. Abrahamism and Karmism are dictated by the Reptilian brain and limbic system. The Enlightenment – and humanity’s future – is all about the neocortex ... about rationalism. The Star Trek future is available only to rationalists, not to people of faith, capitalist consumption and worship of rich elites. The Star Trek world is a rationalist, meritocratic world. In Star Trek, the elites have gone, capitalism has gone, money has gone, faith has gone, Abrahamism has gone, Karmism has gone. Humanity has become enlightened!

The War – the Combatants The enemy are: the rich, the political establishment and their enforcers in the police and army (class traitors, guilty of crimes against the people), the priest caste (popes, pastors, prophets, preachers, imams and rabbis) and the media moguls who deliver the Old World Order’s insidious propaganda designed to create a false consciousness in the people. Who will the heroes be? The answer is students. Students have been destroyed by the rich elites. All over the world, graduates cannot find jobs and careers. They have huge debts and no hope. The future ought to be theirs and yet they are being denied this future by the corrupt elites and banksters who have stolen all the money. Nepotism, cronyism and privilege are rife. If you don’t have a golden ticket into the inner circle, the in-crowd, you’re well and truly fucked. Your dreams will never come true – unless you get rid of your oppressors! Education has become business, an extension of capitalism. True education has been killed off by the elites; they had no need of it. To all students we say this, you have been conned and betrayed. You are the Lost Generation, and the elite don’t care. They’re sitting pretty, as always. You mean nothing to the elite. They are concerned only with themselves and their families. As for you, you can go fuck yourselves as far as the elite are concerned. Well, what are you going to do about it? It’s time for a Global Student Uprising, for the students from every university on Earth to come together and to wage war on behalf of the Second Enlightenment. This time Abrahamism will fall, and the rich elites will go with it. We will enter the true Age of Reason. It’s time for all schoolkids, college students, undergraduates, graduates, postgraduates, academics, all smart and talented people, all meritocrats, all rational people everywhere, everyone who wants a Star Trek future, to come together and declare all-out war on the rich elite. We are going to take all of their money from them and redistribute it. They will pay – literally – for what they have done to the world. They wrecked the global economy and destroyed the future of students everywhere, and now they are the ones who must pick up the tab. They wrecked it, they can fix it – with their own money. The elites must fall. 100% inheritance tax is what destroys them and delivers a world of equal opportunities and meritocracy.

It’s time for the student uprising of Paris 1968 to become the global student uprising of 2017 (or thereabouts). The students (the educated) versus the greedy rich for the soul of humanity: this is the preordained war, the true holy war. Students are the holy warriors, and the false gods of the rich elite are those that must be cast down. There’s no time or space for bullshit conspiracy theories. There’s only one conspiracy – that of the capitalist super rich elite against everyone else. All of the super rich are your enemies. There are no exceptions. Steve Jobs wasn’t a “nice”, “caring”, “cuddly” hippie capitalist. He was a ruthless capitalist billionaire predator, denying you your future. He’s not rendered a good guy because you like his extremely expensive iPhone or iMac (to the joy of Apple’s rapacious shareholders). Mark Zuckerberg isn’t a nice guy for giving you a Facebook platform that allows you to turn yourself into a commodity for sale to capitalist advertisers (to make him a fortune) and to allow your capitalist government to spy on you. Wake up! Stop being suckers. Stop buying into the false consciousness they have sold you. What will the students be fighting for? – their own future, the one being denied to them by the privileged elites who have seized all the resources for themselves and their families. If students aren’t willing to fight for reason, and would prefer to wallow in their appetites and self-indulgent feelings, then the human race doesn’t have a future and will become extinct. It deserves this fate if it turns its back on reason. Students stand for education and the rule of reason. The rich elite stand for greed and the rule of money. Shall education or money determine humanity’s future? Every student everywhere in the world should rise up against Mammon and replace him with Apollo, God of Reason. When students need to party, they have Dionysus to turn to. But there can be no Dionysian parties if students don’t have jobs and careers because the world has been turned into a Waste Land by the greed of the capitalist elite. If you want to party, you must first have a rational, Apollonian world devoted to reason, enlightenment, meritocracy and the public good. Only then will people have the lives and careers they long for, and the best reasons to party. No one is entitled to a good and happy future. We have to fight for it. Above all, we have to fight the rich, private elite and subject them to public control.

The Global Student Army must arise and pit themselves directly against the rich elite and strip them of all their wealth, power and control. Only then can the world live. Do not vote in any democratic elections except for parties advocating 100% inheritance tax. If you are in constituencies with a strong student presence, set up your own Student Party and campaign for 100% inheritance tax – to be used to pay off all your student debts. And, critically, the banking system must be removed from private hands and brought under the absolute control of the people. Get smart. Get wise. Get active. No one is coming to save you. You have to save yourselves. ***** Capitalism – where the rich elites rule. Where money defines you. To be replaced by ... Plato’s Republic where the wisest rule and reason defines you.

Money Street or Reason Street? Shall we ruled by money (the rich elite) or reason (the smart and wise)? That’s the choice for all of us and we must make our choice. If you make no choice then you have by default chosen money since that’s the status quo. The rich elite stole your future from you. Take it back. Give yourself an equal chance. We must reboot the world. We must reset everything. We have to get rid of all the accumulated errors of the past.

Optimates and Populares Nothing ever changes. In ancient Rome, the party of the rich were called the Optimates and the party of the people were the Populares. “The optimates (‘Best Men,’ singular optimas; also known as boni, ‘Good Men’) were the traditionalist majority of the late Roman Republic. They wished to limit the power of the popular assemblies and the Tribunes of the Plebs, and to extend the power of the Senate, which was viewed as more dedicated to the interests of the aristocrats who held the reins of power. In particular, they were concerned with the rise of individual generals who, backed by the tribunate, the assemblies and their own soldiers, could shift

power from the Senate and aristocracy. They were opposed by the populares [popular party]. ... The optimates favoured the nobiles and opposed the ascension of novi homines [new men] into Roman politics.” – Wikipedia Hitherto, the Optimates, and their modern equivalents, have always won, even if they’ve had to pretend to pander to the masses via their great “democratic” con. It’s time for the Populares to win, and to put the Optimates out of business for good. Become the enlightened ones, the shining ones – the Illuminati. Complete Adam Weishaupt’s work to overthrow monarchs, the nobility and the priests – and replace them with a rational meritocracy. “The human race will then become one family, and the world will be the dwelling of Rational Men.” – Adam Weishaupt It’s time for the rebirth of the Situationist International. It’s time to overthrow the Society of the Spectacle that has cast a deadly spell over everyone. “Young people everywhere have been allowed to choose between love and a garbage disposal unit. Everywhere they have chosen the garbage disposal unit.” ― Guy Debord “The more powerful the class, the more it claims not to exist.” ― Guy Debord “Everything that was directly lived has moved away into a representation.” ― Guy Debord “... just as early industrial capitalism moved the focus of existence from being to having, post-industrial culture has moved that focus from having to appearing.” ― Guy Debord “The more he identifies with the dominant images of need, the less he understands his own life and his own desires. The spectacle’s estrangement from the acting subject is expressed by the fact that the individual’s gestures are no longer his own; they are the gestures of someone else who represents them to him.” ― Guy Debord, The Society of the Spectacle “Tourism, human circulation considered as consumption is fundamentally nothing more than the leisure of going to see what has become banal.” ―

Guy Debord “Revolution is not ‘showing’ life to people, but making them live. A revolutionary organization must always remember that its objective is not getting its adherents to listen to convincing talks by expert leaders, but getting them to speak for themselves, in order to achieve, or at least strive toward, an equal degree of participation.” ― Guy Debord “He will essentially follow the language of the spectacle, for it is the only one he is familiar with.” ― Guy Debord “The passions have been sufficiently interpreted; the point now is to discover new ones.” ― Guy Debord “Every given commodity fights for itself, cannot acknowledge the others, and attempts to impose itself everywhere as if it were the only one. The spectacle, then is the epic poem of this struggle, an epic which cannot be concluded by the fall of any Troy. The spectacle does not sing the praises of men and their weapons, but of commodities and their passions. In this blind struggle every commodity, pursuing its passion, unconsciously realizes something higher: the becoming-world of the commodity, which is also the becoming-commodity of the world. Thus, by means of a ruse of commodity logic, what’s specific in the commodity wears itself out in the fight while the commodity-form moves toward its absolute realization.” ― Guy Debord “The spectacle is capital accumulated to the point where it becomes image.” ― Guy Debord “The spectacle is the nightmare of imprisoned modern society which ultimately expresses nothing more than its desire to sleep. The spectacle is the guardian of sleep.” ― Guy Debord “In societies where modern conditions of production prevail, all of life presents itself as an immense accumulation of spectacles.” ― Guy Debord

***** It’s time to take to the streets. It’s time to man the barricades. It’s time to reboot our world, to start again.

Students of the World, Unite. You have nothing to lose but your debts. You have the whole world to gain! A spectre is haunting the world – the spectre of Student Power. All the powers of the old World Order have entered into an unholy alliance to exorcise this spectre: Pope and super rich, rabbis, imams, CEOs, banksters, presidents, prime ministers, chancellors, nobles, monarchs, bully-boy soldiers, police-spies. But it is we who shall exorcise them! If the students – who have their entire futures on the line – can’t topple the rich elite, who can? This is our sacred hour, this is our holy cause – freeing humanity from the dead past, from the Old World Order who trampled over the bones of our ancestors and over us too. Vengeance shall be ours. This is our Vendetta. This is our Liberation. Who can stop the worldwide United Student Front, the Army of the Reason, the Army of the Second Enlightenment? To all students, the world is yours – take it! Who’s going to stop you? You are the educated future of the human race. It’s time to build our own Eden. We don’t need “God”. 1776, 1789, 1917 ... 2017? HyperHumanity The New Human Race The Higher Human Race The Illuminated Human Race The Illuminati Fiat Lux

*************************** How Do You Authenticate God? Christians claim that Lucifer was once God’s most fabulous and beloved creation, the Angel of Light so dazzling that he almost outshone God (and indeed did in his own eyes). If Lucifer seemed like God to himself and to many other angels who followed him (one third of the heavenly host!), how

could a human being know whether or not Lucifer was God if he encountered him and Lucifer declared himself God? To state it clearly, how does a believer know he has encountered the True God and not someone else who is godlike but not God? What criteria does he use to authenticate God’s identity? Abraham heard a voice in his heard ordering him to murder his son. So, how did Abraham know it was the True God giving him commands and not the Falsus Deus (the False God)? – well, apart from the self-evident truth that God would never order anyone to be killed, which, unfortunately, was not a criterion Abraham chose to accept. In the Islamic “Satanic Verses” controversy, Satan, in the guise of the Angel Gabriel, was alleged to have appeared to Mohammed in one of his visions and to have dictated evil verses to him which were then put into the Koran, the alleged perfect Word of God. When it was realized that they were not consistent with the rest of the Koran (because they promoted tolerance of paganism and hinted that Allah was not the sole God but rather only the senior God), they were removed and Mohammed excused his error by saying that Satan was responsible. This tale is strongly denied by Muslims (because it would destroy Islam if there were any doubts about the true authorship of the Koran) but it makes perfect sense that in the early years of Islam, when Mohammed was making no headway with the pagans, and was under pressure to be more conciliatory, that he would try to make his message less hardline. He gave it a go, realized it was a terrible error, and so blamed it on Satan! The point is this – how did Mohammed know he was really dealing with the Angel Gabriel as the messenger of Allah? What tests did he conduct? Islam is full of stories of jinn, the leader of whom is Shaitan. Why couldn’t Shaitan have pretended to be Gabriel and dictated the Koran to Mohammed, making the whole book a set of Satanic verses!!! It seems that the people of the ancient world were addicted to “naming” (the name of something, or the name it gives itself, truly tells you what it is). If someone names himself the Angel Gabriel then he is! But that’s the gospel of the madhouse where any number of lunatics name themselves as figures much grander than their true selves. A madman who names himself Napoleon does not thereby become Napoleon. How can any believer ever know? There are no conceivable objective, rational criteria. Believers have a remarkably touching faith that if a voice

identifies itself as “God” then it really is. They seem never to have encountered the concept of deception, the con, the lie, the pretence, the fraud, the fake, the forgery, the simulacrum. This makes them more or less autistic. And is not the Devil the “Father of Lies”? Did Moses interrogate the burning bush? Who subjected Jesus Christ to any tests that he was “God”? How can anyone know if Mohammed encountered the Angel Gabriel? It’s all just hearsay and bullshit. A believer never knows anything; that’s why he’s a believer and not a knower. Even if “Jesus Christ” came down in the Second Coming, how would anyone know? A powerful alien species might have read the Book of Revelation and decided to carry out an April Fool’s Day prank. If Jesus Christ started ordering all fathers to murder their children, that might seem very unChristlike, but, then, he ordered Abraham to murder his son, so it would in fact come as no surprise. That’s Christianity for you! Quite simply, “belief” is deranged. It offers no certainty at all. If “God” appeared right in front of you right now, you would actually have no idea at all whether it really was God. What questions would you ask to verify his identity, what tests would you conduct? And if you wouldn’t ask any questions or perform any tests, how could you ever be sure who it was?

The Gospel of John Galt “Me! Me! Me! Myself and Mine! Fuck you!”

***** R: “The key to understanding Ayn Rand is that she had started out her writing career as a scriptwriter for trashy Hollywood movies filled with cartoonish heroes and villains who had no connection to what real people are like. She added a crazed Nietzsche-like political theme to this and ended up writing some pretty horrid novels that far too many gullible folks took wayyyy too seriously.” And the same could be said of the writers of the Bible.

Poor Taste “Democracy has poor taste.” – Grayson Perry (“artist”)

Grayson Perry is absolutely right that democracy has poor taste. However, he has omitted to add that oligarchs (patrons of the arts and gatekeepers of the arts) have even worse taste. And those who have the worst taste of all are modern artists themselves. In fact, they are simply not artists. They are “personalities”, social commentators and business people. Their patrons are investors in products that they believe will make them an excellent return, and the gatekeepers are nothing but social and cultural snobs. They are just a new version of the priest caste, telling us that absolute lies are truth, that trashy art is “good”. Art is all about dealers and collectors, and the “artist” is merely the functionary who serves their ends. Perry, responding to a comment that many people think that they are being “taken for a fool” by modern art, argued that you shouldn’t expect to walk into an art gallery and immediately understand it. Eh? Does anyone have any difficulty going into the Sistine Chapel and being struck dumb with amazement at what they are seeing? No one anywhere needs to “understand” the contents of the Sistine Chapel to be in wonder at it. Why do you have to “understand” modern art in order appreciate it? At the very least, it must be wholly lacking in the qualities present in abundance in the Sistine Chapel – awe, majesty, grandeur. At worst, people such as Perry are the latest versions of the charlatan tailors in the Emperor’s New Clothes who claim that you must be a person of exquisite taste and “understanding” before you can see their radiant clothes, the finest in the world. As we all know, the Emperor was stark naked, and only a little boy had the guts to point it out, to not be fooled. Perry and his ilk aren’t fooling anyone. What he’s really arguing is that there’s a certain constructed system of values and jargon deployed by today’s “artists” and the art colleges that churn them out, and unless you understand the “language” you will fail to grasp and appreciate what you are seeing. What, is art now a subject like physics or metaphysics? Do you need to have a PhD to know what’s going on? Art has always had two levels: a level of sensory immediacy and a coded level where the artist was “saying something”. Today, all of the sensory immediacy has gone and we are now left purely to decipher the artist’s “message”. But, you know what, who cares? If an artist can’t manage the sensory immediacy of art, who cares what he thinks about anything? He has failed task No. 1 of an artist, so who wants to listen to his artistic opinions? You might as well read postmodern philosophy if you want quirky ideas expressed in a strange

technical vocabulary. Artists are now simply inept postmodern philosophers who use objects to express their bad ideas rather than the written page. Art is well and truly dead. Only the charlatans remain.

Validators The world of snobbery, of “taste”, is all about gatekeepers and validators. They have two tasks: to endorse profitable, “democratic” products on the one hand, and elitist products on the other, the latter being the “status” goods that keep the mob and the elite separate. The gatekeepers and validators are those that construct, maintain and define class difference.

Thinking of Others “If I knew something useful to my family and not to my country, I would try to forget it. If I knew something useful to my country and harmful to Mankind, I would look upon it as a crime.” – Montesquieu This is the opposite of the “morality” of free-market capitalists and anarcho-libertarians. “If I knew something useful to my family and not to my country, I would patent it and exploit it to the maximum.” – Capitalism

Different Views of Society Thomas Hobbes claimed that fear drove humans to establish society (for protection). Modern anarchists and libertarians have never explained how, if government backed up by force were removed, a bloodbath would not result, from which brutal warlords would emerge as the rulers of society and give the world the most horrific lesson in absolute despotism. Economist Adam Smith said that selfishness was at the root of society and that society was guided by an “invisible hand” which derived from everyone acting selfishly. (This is also Ayn Rand and the libertarians’ view). Jean-Jacques Rousseau said that cooperation via the General Will was the true basis of society (whereas the libertarians say that the particular will of the individual should be endorsed and the General Will of the Collective comprehensively rejected).

So, what shall we choose as the basis of our mutual social contract – fear, selfishness or cooperation? The best answer is self-evident. We don’t want to be afraid and we don’t want any irrational, invisible hand of selfishness. We want and need the rational cooperation offered by meritocracy.

The Silent God So, imagine a single parent who ignores his children and instead “telepathically” communicates with a bearded stranger, ordering him to go round to his children and “reveal” his instructions to the children via a “sacred” text of the parent’s thoughts. The children must obey to the letter to be rewarded and allowed to enter the parent’s company, or, if they disobey in any way, they will be punished forever in a place of limitless pain and never be allowed to see their parent. Well, would you regard this parent as an exemplar of excellent parenting skills, or as a psychopath who shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near children? Yet isn’t this exactly how the Abrahamic “God” treats us, his supposed creations? He never talks directly to us. He sends us baffling, irrational bearded prophets and holy books and expects us to believe every word, even when they make no sense. He claims to love us and then threatens us with the most grotesque tortures if we should ever disobey him. What kind of parent would ever do such a thing? He would immediately be arrested for child abuse and mental cruelty. In the tale of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eve, who is the guilty one – Adam and Eve or their single parent (“God”)? Does God behave like a loving parent or a psychopath gratuitously tormenting his innocent, naive children? If anyone was guilty of Original Sin in Eden, it was God! And if anyone should be sent to hell and tortured forever, it’s him! Why is it that the Gnostics looked at the record of the Abrahamic God and immediately concluded that he was the Devil, while the Abrahamists looked at that same sick record and concluded he was God? One side or the other has got it horrifically wrong. One side or the other is worshipping the Devil and calling him “God”.

Here’s a clue – the Gnostics are the good guys!

The Differential Dialectic Everyone is moving at different rates along the dialectical route to perfection. Some people, the enlightened, are much, much further along the track. Most human beings are barely out of the jungles and caves. They are glorified animals and present a huge brake on evolution. Abrahamism has destroyed the minds of billions of people and made them believe in absurd fantasies. We can’t progress as a species until we have escaped all of the false nonsense of the past, especially mainstream religion.

Mary, Mary, Quite Contrary Mary, mother of Jesus Christ (actually, mother out-of-wedlock of Yehoshua ben Yosef) is the only woman mentioned by name in the Koran. Which rather tells you about the Koran’s attitude to women!

What Comes Next? BHCH: “I can barely take this shit anymore! Once Obama is done, we’re just gonna get another weak minded puppet that will be controlled in the same way. The NSA will find something on him or her and threaten exposure for noncompliance. Same as they’ve done to the House and Senate, and federal judges. I am gonna end up in a psych ward! So many people, so little heart. I have to find a way to appeal to the closed minds of a small Christian town. I found people who want the Manifesto, but would they stand up and fight? Or would they waddle back to their stables after seeing what we’re up against? I will stand up for what’s right. Even if I stand alone.” At least you know what’s going on ... while so many don’t. Knowing the truth has never been popular.

9/11 RB: Usually I like your material, but this one I think misses the mark, especially on 9/11. There’s heaps of evidence that suggests it was an inside job! The towers were old buildings, half empty office space and people profited immensely when they were destroyed! Equally the ultimate profit

level generated from the wars they helped justify were also worth orders of magnitude more than those buildings.” There’s no evidence at all that it was inside job. RB offers nothing but speculation and conjecture. America made a fortune from WWII. Does that mean it started WWII? RB, and multitudes like him, argue from consequences to causes. They see that someone got rich from something and conclude that he must have engineered it. This is the classic conspiracy theorist mindset. You can’t reason with such people. On the one hand, RB implies that government was responsible for 9/11 in order to profit from the resultant wars. On the other, he implies that destroying the Twin Towers was an insurance scam by its private owners to make a fortune. Well, which is it? This is the whole problem with conspiracy theories. They fire a scattergun and hope something sticks. Was the purpose to collect insurance or justify war? Was it a “private” inside job or a “public” inside job? All that RB is really saying is that 9/11 was an inside job because some people got rich as a result of it. Why, in a capitalist system, wouldn’t some people profit from disaster? That’s what capitalism is all about. It’s “disaster economics”. RB makes no attempt whatsoever to address the prima facie fact that Muslim terrorists carried out 9/11. He simply ignores this and rambles on about how it would be advantageous to someone to blow up old buildings to make a profit, hence it must have been an inside job. Almost anything can be “explained” using this type of reasoning. Any “crime” can be attributed to anyone who has made money out of anything. The money is their motive, hence they must have done it. This is simplistic, infantile, irrational drivel. We’re sick of hearing the ludicrous ramblings of these conspiracy theorists. Go and read a mathematics book and learn how to think logically.

Secret Societies AD: “I don’t know what type of secret societies you mean, but occult secret societies don’t care about politics. Their concern is teaching their members.” Occult societies don’t care about politics? WTF! To take an interest in the occult, magic, alchemy or anything out of the ordinary was once to court death for heresy or witchcraft. It was an immensely political act, rejecting

the prevailing religious and political order (which were harnessed together in medieval Europe). Would people who know very little about secret societies stop telling us what secret societies are! Know your history before you shout your mouth off. Don’t confuse faux secret societies with the real thing. Anything you teach members is political. It changes their entire view of reality, including what they regard as politically acceptable. Aristotle said that man is a political animal. He’s right. Everything we do reflects politics. If the political views of secret societies were translated into those of mainstream society, we would be living in an entirely different world.

“INT” – The Lonely Gang Ayn Rand changed the world, setting the modern economic and political agenda of America (and thus the world) with Atlas Shrugged. No INTJ or INTP banging on about mathematics will ever rival Rand’s influence. In this world, it’s impossible for a mathematical message to attract a significant audience. Anything that does not attach itself to mainstream culture has no chance of prospering. The task is not to flog a dead horse, but to find a Trojan horse that can be accepted into the mainstream and allow it to be conquered. That will involve an incredibly imaginative, emotive Mythos. It certainly won’t involve mathematics, science, philosophy or anything difficult and complex. Once our task of setting out our position as we want to set it out is completed, we will be looking for an entirely different mode of communication. In a grotesquely dumbed-down world, INT communication is a disaster and will never change anything. It’s telling that every Facebook page about meritocracy or Illuminism shows the same small group of familiar faces. It’s an echo chamber that’s making no headway at all into anything wider. Doing more of the same will have exactly the same outcome.

Business and Legality “Nothing is illegal if 100 well-placed businessmen decide to do it.” – Andrew Young

Capitalism is legalised crime. A capitalist banker can steal your money, your house, your job and even your life from you, with complete impunity. Because it’s a remote (done at a distance), and abstract (involves all sorts of obscure small print), it’s deemed legal. We should stop thinking of crime in terms of someone coming up to us and physically mugging us. We are being metaphorically mugged all the time.

Authority “Authority” has an incredible power. People show a striking willingness to obey authority. People will obey fake authority as much as real authority because they can’t tell the difference. Any actor who puts on a doctor’s coat becomes a doctor as far as patients are concerned. Why would they imagine he was an actor? People can’t help treating things at face value. Someone tells Abraham he is “God” and Abraham believes it without question.

The Question “For this was I born, and for this I came into the world, that I should give testimony to the truth. Everyone that is of the truth, heareth my voice.” – Jesus Christ (John 18:37) “Pilate saith to him, ‘What is truth?’” – (John 18:38) Pilate got no answer and left. If Jesus Christ came to give testimony to the truth, why didn’t he? Why can’t you find any rational truth when you read in the New Testament the words of a person alleged to be God himself? Why do you find only platitudes, simplistic stories, superstitions, contradictions and irrational nonsense? The New Testament is exactly why you shouldn’t believe in Jesus Christ. If that’s the Word of God, God help us! If you read Leibniz, you can imagine yourself in the presence of someone well on the way to becoming God. You get no such impression from the infantile parables and sermons of Jesus Christ.

Abrahamism and the Stanley Milgram Experiment “Now, one of the illusions about human behaviour is that it stems entirely from personality or character, but social psychology shows us that often

behaviour is dominated by the social roles we are asked to play.” – Stanley Milgram Two thirds of people who participated in Stanley Milgram’s “obedience to authority” experiment were willing to administer what they believed was a fatal electric shock to an experimental subject. They obeyed authority without question. Was Abraham simply one of those people who will readily kill if ordered to do so by a voice of authority? Abrahamists are those in the Milgram experiment who went “all the way” simply because a man in a white coat told them to. Why does anyone revere Abraham for being prepared to murder his son on the say-so of a voice in his head? He should be regarded as a dreadful warning from history, the world’s first programmed killer, the first “Manchurian Candidate”.

Are Abrahamists Literally Mad? Are the Abrahamists those who would fail the Milgram Test en masse, i.e. two thirds of the human race! Is the remaining third of humanity the good, moral, pagan minority of decent human beings?

Do As You’re Told Why do so many people allow themselves to be bossed around? Capitalism couldn’t survive without this impulse.

The Future “The future’s already here. It’s just not evenly distributed.” – William Gibson The world is full of different mental time zones. Muslims, for example, have a mentality centuries behind everyone else.

Religious Sermons All religious sermons involve Mythos, trite interpretations and rehashings of Bible stories. Imagine a world in which all religious sermons had to be based on Logos and had to deal, like the God Series, with the most complex philosophy, mathematics and science. 100% of those who currently dare to

give sermons would be out of a job, and that would be a 100% good thing. The human race would take an enormous intellectual leap forward. The priest caste have done more than anyone else to hold back humanity’s progress. They are the most dangerous and vile people in the world. They are also the most deceitful people the human race has ever produced. Every single one of them is a liar to the core. They themselves are the false prophets against whom they are always warning us. They could make the greatest possible contribution to truth and human evolution ... by committing suicide!

War Without War “Isn’t this (I claim) the same logic, the fundamental feature of our late capitalist society? We want what? We want a product, an object, without paying the harsh price for it. We want beer without alcohol. We want chocolate without sugar. We want coffee without caffeine. We want the thing without the harsh element. And even in politics, what was the Colin Powell doctrine? ... War, with all the shock and awe bombing, but without any casualties on our side: war without war.” – Slavoj Žižek We are regularly denounced by the “light and love” brigade because we refuse to advocate turning the other cheek. Well, let’s get this straight: we are Jacobins. But we will present our cheeks to our enemies ... they can kiss our ass! You cannot have a revolution without a revolution, without the “harsh thing”. You cannot love your enemies into surrendering their power. Sheep don’t convert wolves by offering them their necks!

Virtue and Terror “Virtue without terror is impotent, terror without virtue is blind, no? I accept this totally. I don’t have any problem. I mean... the crucial point of every radical movement is to have terror through virtue. In order to establish the fundamentals of democracy you have to go through this zerolevel of Jacobinism. You cannot say we could have done it in a much easier way.” – Slavoj Žižek You are deluded if you think that the powers-that-be will do nothing to resist the end of their power. If they attack us, what shall we do to them?

“This may sound totalitarian, but I think there is a moment of truth in it. To say I want to stay out is violently to take sides. I will give you a shocking comparison. You know that Mahatma Gandhi, an anti-Jacobin if there ever is one, says in some of his writings the same thing: the lesson is, in a really tough situation of choice, there is no neutral position; you have to take sides. Not taking sides is already taking sides.” – Slavoj Žižek This is exactly right. To not take sides is to take sides. By default, by doing nothing, you have taken the side of the status quo, of the powers-that-be. “Literally, terror is an emanation of virtue. That is to say, in a radical situation of injustice, the only actual proof of love is to accept to fight, to accept to struggle. This could be the lesson of it. And it’s simply true; we shouldn’t be afraid of it. Jesus Christ says precisely the same thing, when he at the same time says love, turn the left cheek and all that stuff, and then he says – you remember? – if you don’t hate your mother, your father, you are not my follower; and then he says, I bring sword, war, destruction, I don’t bring peace, and so on and so on. It’s as simple as that. This is the radical emancipatory logic which one should accept.” – Slavoj Žižek Faced with radical injustice, what are you prepared to do to end it once and for all?

The False Path WDL: “Then why were both AC and AOI calling for global revolution that obviously would include the taking of human lives? Are they just another false path towards gnosis?” Anyone who thinks pacifism is the “true” path to gnosis hasn’t understood a single thing about reality. The dialectic is the most savage thing you could possibly get. It’s defined by war between opposites and it’s precisely this brutal struggle that has allowed us to evolve consciousness, rationalism and intelligence. The rational future will be peaceful only when all the forces that stand in the way of that future have been dialectically eradicated. We despise “last men” and cowards such as WDL. If you’re not up for a fight, become a Buddhist and bury your head in the sand. If the world is changed for the better, it certainly won’t be thanks to your non-efforts and your false definition of gnosis. Gnosis is the culmination of the dialectic and the dialectic is pure Will to Power.

It’s remarkable how many clowns think the world can be changed without any effort or struggle but just by us all sitting around and chanting, “Om”. You dinosaur people are just waiting like lambs to be devoured by the leonine dialectic. You want change without the “harsh thing”? Well, you can’t have it.

Punishment and Revenge The ancient Greeks identified two types of punishment: kolasis and timoria. The first is “corrective punishment” done to help the punishee and the second is “revenge punishment” done to satisfy the punisher. “The punishment is inflicted for the sake of the person punished; revenge for that of the punisher to satisfy his feelings.” – Leibniz

The Commutative Law In mathematics, the commutative law states that ab = ba. In politics, the commutative law means that anything that affects your life is something that you should, in turn, be able to affect. So, if you are subject to a government, you should be able to get rid of that government if you don’t like it. With the “free market”, we find that it has an enormous and even decisive influence over our lives, yet we have no say over it at all. The market breaks the commutative law and it’s precisely for this reason that it allows the rich to rule us, regardless of what governments we elect. The Constitution should require that everything within the polity be commutative. Otherwise, “people power” is an illusion. Free-market capitalism, monarchy, oligarchy and plutocracy are all anticommutative. Inheritance laws are anti-commutative. Privilege is anticommutative. Nepotism and cronyism are anti-commutative. Meritocracy is fully commutative – you have a meaningful influence, or the chance to have meaningful influence, over anything and everything that influences you.

Unconditional Love? “A good man is one who loves everyone, so far as reason permits.” – Leibniz People should of course love each other – if it’s rational to do so. The notion of “unconditional” love is, however, not good but bad. It means that

you love the persecutors, psychopaths and oppressors, and do nothing to get rid of them. That puts you on the side of hate, not love, so “unconditional love” is ipso facto a breeding ground for hate!

The People and the Rich You can have only a single, unitary people. As soon as they are fragmented, they are no longer a people. You cannot treat the super rich as part of the people. They are different group with entirely different priorities. They are in fact the enemies of the people since their power comes from dominating, manipulating and exploiting the people. The people, if they are to be free, must overthrow the rich.

Religious Truth (By courtesy of a viral internet meme...) Taoism – Shit Happens. Buddhism – If Shit Happens, it really isn’t Shit. Hinduism – This Shit has Happened Before. Islam – If Shit Happens, it is the Will of Allah. Catholicism – Shit Happens because you deserve it. Protestantism – Work harder or Shit will Happen. Judaism – Why does this Shit always Happen to us? Materialist – Whoever dies with the most Shit wins! Atheist – I can’t believe this Shit! Rastafarianism – Let’s smoke this Shit!

Education (the Wisdom of Ken Robinson) “The fact is that given the challenges we face, education doesn’t need to be reformed – it needs to be transformed. The key to this transformation is not to standardize education, but to personalize it, to build achievement on discovering the individual talents of each child, to put students in an

environment where they want to learn and where they can naturally discover their true passions.” – Ken Robinson, The Element: How Finding Your Passion Changes Everything “If you’re not prepared to be wrong, you’ll never come up with anything original.” – Ken Robinson “For most of us the problem isn’t that we aim too high and fail – it’s just the opposite – we aim too low and succeed.” – Ken Robinson “One of the essential problems for education is that most countries subject their schools to the fast-food model of quality assurance when they should be adopting the Michelin model instead. The future for education is not in standardizing but in customizing; not in promoting groupthink and ‘deindividuation’ but in cultivating the real depth and dynamism of human abilities of every sort.” – Ken Robinson “Public schools were not only created in the interests of industrialism – they were created in the image of industrialism. In many ways, they reflect the factory culture they were designed to support. This is especially true in high schools, where school systems base education on the principles of the assembly line and the efficient division of labour. Schools divide the curriculum into specialist segments: some teachers install math in the students, and others install history. They arrange the day into standard units of time, marked out by the ringing of bells, much like a factory announcing the beginning of the workday and the end of breaks. Students are educated in batches, according to age, as if the most important thing they have in common is their date of manufacture. They are given standardized tests at set points and compared with each other before being sent out onto the market. I realize this isn’t an exact analogy and that it ignores many of the subtleties of the system, but it is close enough.” – Ken Robinson Why is the education system as it is? It’s purely to serve the needs of the capitalist elite. It has no connection whatsoever with what the students, and indeed the world, need.

The Groaners and Moaners We made the God Series available for free and this is the response we got from DF. He quoted a very old statement we made, namely: “The God

Factory by Mike Hockney is the first of three books setting out the basis of Illumination, the religion of the Ancient Order of the Illuminati. The other two forthcoming titles are – The God Game: How to Create the Universe and The Illuminated Soul.” DF said, “I was able to download the God Game for free. The Illuminated Soul doesn’t even exist and The God Factory is not available for free. Inconsistency...” So, instead of “thanks” we get slagged off and told we’re being “inconsistent”. Well, DF, don’t read our books. They’re not for people like you. Moaning, whinging cynics will never profit from our books. The God Factory was originally separate from the God Series. We had hoped to condense everything we needed to say into one book called The God Game, but it soon became apparent that this wasn’t feasible, and thus the God Series was born. The Illuminated Soul likewise has now expanded into the Soul Series. And there’s another series to come called the MythosLogos Series. We loathe pedants and people who can’t grasp the simplest of all notions – plans change, details alter, shit happens. As John Lennon said, “Life is what happens to you while you’re busy making other plans.” Obviously, DF is not someone who ever changes his plans (what, is he a robot?). The world stands in awe at his “consistency”. Oh, hold on a moment, DF doesn’t actually do anything at all, and that’s why he’s in no danger of ever changing his plans. He doesn’t have any. Well, other than whinging, whining, moaning and groaning about others, and getting obsessed with trivial nonsense.

The Evil Priest Caste “And of all plagues with which mankind are curst, ecclesiastic tyranny’s the worst.” – Daniel Defoe Priests, vicars, pastors, reverends, preachers, prophets, gurus, imams and rabbis are astoundingly evil people. They are congenital liars and corrupters, doing everything in their power to terrify people into falling under their control. They themselves are the people from whom we need to be saved, the ravening wolves who feed on decent people. The whole priest caste should be shunned and reviled. They ought to be spat on in the street.

The Gods

Pagans looked to the gods for favours in this world, and did not think too much about the next life (afterlife). Christians looked to God for salvation in the next world, and did not think too much about this life. The idea of paradise in the next life became overwhelmingly powerful in the minds of the masses (leading such miserable lives), and thus paganism died and Christianity flourished.

Unholy City A holy city is where God meets man. Or, rather, where he doesn’t. A holy city is in fact where the lie, the delusion, that God meets man resides and wreaks its terrible damage to the human psyche, being relentlessly fuelled by the evil priest caste and the false prophets. Jerusalem (Judaism), Rome (Christianity) and Mecca (Islam) are the three most evil, unholy cities on the Earth – where the Devil sojourns.

The Inside Job It’s extraordinary that so many Americans believe they were attacked by their own government on 9/11 rather than by Muslim terrorists. This tells us that these Americans hate the principle of government more than they hate Islam. In fact, they don’t seem to know anything at all about Islam. If they understood Islam and its history, they would soon forget about 9/11 being an “inside job”. It just goes to show that people will always blame what they hate most, regardless of the facts. All of the prima facie facts of 9/11 support the official version of events. Despite the delusions of conspiracy theorists, none at all point to government involvement. The conspiracy theorists hate their government and don’t hate Islam (or are indifferent to it). It’s amazing that no 9/11 conspiracy site ever refers to Islam or its toxic beliefs and hatred of the West (and of America in particular) and instead just bashes the government over and over again. It’s as if they inhabit a parallel universe, full of shape-shifting pan-dimensional lizards! Oh, hold on a moment, they do!

Banksters Shouldn’t we take out contracts on the banksters? Shouldn’t we whack them?! There’s an ATF agency – the “Untouchables” – for taking out

gangsters. Why isn’t there an equivalent organisation for taking out banksters?

Islam Young Muslims have risen up against dictators in numerous Islamic nations. The only surprise is why it took them so long. The explanation is that they were waiting for the internet. The internet is the ultimate source of revolution because it shows everyone in the world how others are living, and if they are having a much better life than you. Everyone on Earth wants the good life. If they see everyone around them living in misery, they will accept misery. However, when they see others in foreign nations having a ball, they want to take off their Cinderella rags and go to the ball too. The Muslim uprisings are simply the first stage of a tremendous convulsion within the Islamic world caused by the internet. Two diametrically opposed processes are happening at once. Liberal Muslims like those in the cities of Turkey want to become more Western and more liberal. And radicalized Muslims – radicalized via propaganda on the internet – want to become less liberal. Islam is splitting in two, which will have profound consequences for the world. In fact, another, deadlier split is happening, caused by the first. The radicalised Sunni Muslims now regard Shia Muslims as disgusting heretics – even worse than Western infidels – and we are seeing in Syria the beginning of the Islamic Civil War between Sunnis and Shias. The Western leaders like to portray what’s happening in Syria as an uprising against a dictator. They have totally missed what’s actually happening. The Syrian dictator belongs to a sect much closer to the Shias than the Sunnis, and the uprising is actually an uprising against his sect. This is a religious war – a holy war (jihad) – not a political war. During the Cold War, the Americans armed the Mujahedin to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan, and gave birth to the Taliban and Al-Qaeda! Now the Americans are planning to arm the latest version of the Mujahedin in Syria, and will in due course give rise to a Syrian Taliban and Al-Qaeda. We’ve seen it all before, and we’ve seen that Western clowns like Barack Obama and David Cameron have zero understanding of Islam and what’s going on in the Islamic psyche. The fate of Islam in this century will largely determine the future of the world. The West has only one real option – to do everything it can to

support Westernized, liberal Muslims and bring about an Islamic enlightenment, culminating in the most intelligent Muslims becoming atheists, agnostics and Gnostics, just as the European enlightenment achieved for liberal Christians. The West was transformed by the loss of the Vatican’s power and prestige. The Islamic world will be as radically transformed by the loss of Mecca’s power and prestige. And the whole world will benefit.

The Shahada The shahada is the summation of Islam: “There is no god but God; Mohammed is the messenger of God.” How about, “There is no allah but Allah”? Sounds stupid to the Western ear, doesn’t it? How about, “There is no Allah, so Mohammed isn’t his messenger, or, alternatively, Mohammed is the messenger of his own fantasy, of his own psychosis, or is a malicious liar on a personal power trip”? How about, “It’s an irrational opinion, belief or conjecture that Allah exists, and an irrational opinion, belief or conjecture that Mohammed is his messenger”? How you express something can change it from an expression of doubt into an expression of certainty. There are no reasons, no facts, no evidence, no rational proofs that in any way substantiate Allah, the Koran or Mohammed, and yet Muslims proclaim the shahada as if it were something incontestable. Through constant repetition, it psychologically takes on an infallible status. That’s how brainwashing works!

This is Sparta!!! A commemorative stone was placed on top of the burial mound of the 300 Spartan heroes who gave their lives to the last man at Thermopylae. The epitaph engraved on the stone read: “Go tell the Spartans, stranger, that here we lie, obedient to their laws.” This is something that would never under any circumstances be written about anarchists, libertarians or free-market capitalists.

The Spartans died because they loved their government, State, culture and society, and were prepared to sacrifice their lives for them. Anarchists, libertarians and free-market capitalists would never lay down their lives for the State. If anything, they would fight the State. The ancient Greek love of the State (city-state in that time) is almost completely absent in the present day. No one has any love for capitalist democracies. People love positive liberty States, but all modern States are based on negative liberty, which is about loving the individual (consumer) rather than loving the State. The Vietnamese defeated the Americans because they were on the side of positive liberty while the Americans were on the side of negative liberty. Nazi Germany was loved by its people because it was a positive liberty State. The Soviet Union was an even bigger positive liberty State and defeated Nazi Germany because of the force of positive liberty (any negative liberty State would have surrendered unconditionally after the initial Nazi onslaught). Why was communism defeated by capitalism? Because positive liberty States have to deliver success, to make the population proud. A failing positive liberty is always overcome by negative liberty, by the rise of the selfish individual. When people don’t have a sacred cause (positive liberty), their only cause is themselves (negative liberty).

God is Dead “God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. Yet his shadow still looms. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?” – Nietzsche What does Nietzsche mean when he says that God is dead? In fact, this is the wrong question. For one thing, Nietzsche was an atheist and never believed that God was literally alive in the first place. For Nietzsche, God’s existence was related to people’s belief in him, not in his actuality. A God

of belief dies not through old age, disease or anything else, but when the belief in him dissolves. The only thing that sustains the illusion of his existence is belief, and, without that, he doesn’t exist. The proper question then is how did we kill God, or, rather, how did we kill the belief in God? Plainly, atheists kill belief in God outright for the obvious reason that they have no belief in God and continually point out why belief in God is absurd. Nietzsche’s slogan is actually addressed to atheists. If you have killed God, what then? Are you just going to shrug and then continue to obey all the moral codes devised when people still believed in God? Nietzsche says to atheists, “If you kill God then you yourselves must become Gods – or otherwise all of the values of the world will crumble to nothing and nihilism will reign.” Yet believers have also killed God. They have killed him by patently not believing enough. Most religious people, especially Christians, assign religion a very low priority in their lives. They are far more interested in money, their job, status, their possessions, their entertainment, their vacations, their cars, guns, houses, and so on. They go to church once a week and believe whenever it’s convenient and whenever it comforts them. Otherwise, they don’t think about belief and don’t do anything to show they believe. They just go through the motions.

***** “Richard L. Rubenstein represented that radical edge of Jewish thought working through the impact of the Holocaust. In a technical sense he maintained, based on the Kabbalah, that God had ‘died’ in creating the world. However, for modern Jewish culture he argued that the death of God occurred in Auschwitz. Although the literal death of God did not occur at this point, this was the moment in time in which humanity was awakened to the idea that a theistic God may not exist. In Rubenstein’s work, it was no longer possible to believe in an orthodox/traditional theistic God of the Abrahamic covenant; rather, God is a historical process.” – Wikipedia In truth, “God” cannot be killed. “God” stands for the sacred and without the sacred there is only the profane, which degenerates into absolute skepticism, cynicism and nihilism. The human race cannot survive in these circumstances. A spiritually dead humanity would become extinct.

Humanity must have a profound connection to the sacred. Mercifully, it’s possible to do this rationally – via the ontological mathematics and hyperrationalism of Illuminism. What has truly died is not God, but faith in God. What we need now is knowledge of God, attained through mathematical reason. The only absolute truths are the eternal truths of reason, of mathematics. Anything that is not eternally true is not true at all, but mere interpretation, as Nietzsche put it. Nietzsche’s greatest error was that he didn’t accept eternal, infallible, necessary truths of reason and instead promoted the notion of temporal, fallible, contingent interpretations of fact, in which Will to Power was invested. The difference between Illuminism and Nietzsche’s philosophy lies in exactly this issue of whether eternal truths of reason exist or not. If they do (and they do!), we live in a rational world, a divine world, and we will all become Gods. If they don’t, we live in a madhouse: there are no truths, no values, nothing to anchor us, nothing to deliver us from nihilism. Nothing is sacred. All is profanity and vileness ... and we might as well be dead ... or Nietzschean Superman who affirm everything, no matter how abject!

The Meritocratic Question Should people be allowed to buy competitive advantages over others? For example, rich parents can provide their children with the finest education money can buy, giving them an overwhelming and decisive advantage in life. Is this right? We call this “privilege”. A child’s own talent hasn’t determined its future, but rather the wealth of its parents, over which it has zero control, and to which it contributed nothing. If you think parents should be allowed to buy competitive advantage then you are anti-meritocratic and a supporter of privilege. America – which is ruled by privileged, rich families – is the quintessence of antimeritocracy. To call America a meritocracy is obscene and insane. If you’re a meritocrat, it means you will have a great deal to say about parental wealth and what parents are allowed to do with it. Of one thing you will be certain: they will never be permitted to use their money to secure an unmerited, overwhelming competitive advantage for their offspring, leading

to the inevitable creation of dynastic family elites ruling the world in perpetuity – exactly as we have now!

Lust for the Norm RB: “I’m here to tell you that what you call ‘reality’ is a filter. It’s put here for us, (maybe even by us?) because the dimensions of existence beyond this ‘safe haven’ of familiarity and mundane ordinariness, are beyond the capacity for our fragile human minds to comprehend. There are dimensions of reality that are so bizarre, that when you find yourself immersed in them, you pray for the mundane. Familiarity becomes almost sexual. You lust for the norm! When the filter finally gets put back in place, the only thing left for you is a profound exclamation of intense gratitude!”

Merit Rather Than Privilege The dead have no right to control the living through inheritance (by which the inheritors are provided with overwhelming competitive advantage that they did nothing to earn, and which destroys the rise of the authentically most meritorious). Merit is all about ensuring generational fairness and equal opportunities. Privilege and inheritance do the opposite. They are all about entrenched inequality and unfairness. New generations – those not from privileged backgrounds – have lost the race even before they have begun it.

The Movement The Movement has a very simple aim ... to reboot the world. Let’s start again, and let’s get it right this time. All of the old systems of control and privilege must be swept away. The rich have had their day.

Service The elites have no interest in public service, only self-service. Positive liberty is about public service, and self-service negative liberty.

Democracy Ancient Athenian democracy overthrew the rich and was despised by the rich. Modern capitalist democracy is loved by the rich. Why? Because they

have mastered it now. They have taken complete control of democracy. Democracy is, today, the Dictatorship of Plutocrats.

The Sacred Cause For most people, their family is their sacred cause. They define the meaning of their life with respect to their children. They do not define it with respect to the human race. Yet, as Benjamin Franklin said, “We must, indeed, all hang together or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately.” So, it is with families. Whether we like it or not, our fates are all intertwined. If we don’t cooperate and stand together we will all go down individually. Only the most rational human beings have ever understood that. We must promote the General Will, not particular wills. Free-market capitalism, based on game theory and relentless atomisation and fragmentation of society, is devoted to ensuring that everyone hangs separately. The elite win by dividing and ruling – in other words, by promoting absolute cut-throat competition between families. Families that are out to stand on the necks of others will never combine to overthrow the elites.

No Markets The American Revolutionaries rightly proclaimed, “No taxation without representation.” They rose in righteous rebellion against the British tyrant king. Yet what do we find today? Millions of Americans openly call for the end of government and the State and their replacement by “free markets”. Well, to what degree are people represented in markets? Do you have control over markets? Your whole economic destiny is shaped by them and yet you have no say at all in who controls them. The controllers are unelected and unaccountable. They are worse tyrants than the British kings and yet Americans line up to be enslaved by the rich elites who rig the markets. No Markets Without Representation!

What Price? It was said in the seventeenth century that a female could be either a mother, a daughter, a nun or a whore. If a whore, the only question was what price. Are things so different today?

The View From the Conspiracy Theory Land JM: “It should come as no surprise that the people who own and control the world have put their interests before the greater good of humanity. Obviously many of these are not Jewish. For at least 400 years, civilization has been under covert attack by a diabolical multi-generational program now called the ‘New World Order’, ‘globalization’ or ‘world government’. “Essentially globalization represents the consolidation of absolute economic, political and cultural power in the hands of a cabal of super rich dynastic families (bankers and their vast corporate networks) headquartered in the City of London. The UN, IMF and World Bank are some of their instruments. These families include the Rothschilds, Warburgs and other socalled Jews who have intermarried with Anglo-American and European aristocracy. Non-Jewish dynastic families include the Russells, the Cecils and the Churchills. “The New World Order will resurrect the feudal relationship between a wealthy aristocracy and a large impoverished serfdom with a small intermediary class of soldiers/police and technocrats. This is being imposed in Britain and the rest of the world now, today! These dynastic families have embraced Freemasonry, an occult secret society that worships Lucifer. The top rank of this cabal is called the ‘Illuminati’. The Illuminati uses antiSemitism to manipulate Jews and others. Jews figure prominently in Illuminati-sponsored movements such as Communism, Zionism, Socialism, Nazism, Liberalism, Feminism, and Neo Conservatism. Most are opportunists or idealistic dupes who think they are building a secular utopia based on reason and not a world police state straight out of George Orwell’s 1984.” To understand the concealed ideology of the crackpot making these statements, one only has to make a note of the causes not attributed to the “Illuminati”. We see no mention of anarchism, libertarianism and freemarket anarcho-capitalist libertarianism. Clearly, JM is of this ilk. Since the Illuminati apparently have their fingers in every other pie, no matter how incompatible, why not these too? Because then JM himself would be one of the “dupes” of the Illuminati, and we can’t have that, can we? Everything is controlled by the Illuminati except the things that JM believes in. Funny, that!

It’s easy to spot the real agenda here – absolute hatred of government, authority, rationalism, sanity, rule by anyone (no matter how meritorious), the total identification of any kind of government with totalitarianism and an elite conspiracy against the world. Of course, the real conspiracy is that of Ayn Rand’s anarcho-capitalist libertarian elite who now rule the world via their unregulated, global, “free” market (in fact, an absolutely rigged market run by unelected, unaccountable cartels of “John Galts”). The Randian elite sit above the level of nation states and rule the whole world via the suprapolitical “market” (global capital), the very device championed by all those who hate government and the State. We now live under a de facto one-world government of the super rich, fanatically supported by their moronic, retarded, irrationalist anarchist and libertarian legions, to which JM belongs. At every turn, the Randian elite are exonerated and the blame put on the Illuminati for everything. How can it make any sense to say that the Illuminati are responsible for “Communism, Zionism, Socialism, Nazism, Liberalism, Feminism, and Neo Conservatism”? This is simply a list of what JM dislikes! You can be sure that nothing endorsed by JM is ever on the list, but why not given how wide-ranging, eclectic and contradictory the list is? You might as well say that the Illuminati are responsible for everything, including all the groups opposed to the Illuminati! After all, what better way is there to sow mass confusion and disunity? The Illuminati have covered every base. No matter what you think, your strings are being pulled by the Illuminati. Even by opposing the Illuminati, you are simply carrying out their preordained masterplan. That mad formula is, ultimately, where all conspiracy theories about the all-powerful Illuminati lead.

Incentives For the rich to work harder, you have to pay them more (the carrot approach) For the poor to work harder, you have to pay them less (the stick approach). This is the system devised by the rich. Funny, that.

Why don’t we pay the rich less and the poor more? Do you think the world will fall apart?

The Brutal Truth “I fucking love the ‘ladness’. The ladness is just basically fucking people over for money.” – a self-described “City lad”; a trainee with City Law Firm Clifford Chance That’s what the “elite” do – they fuck you over for money. That’s what defines them.

The Other Side of the Coin One in five adults in America said that in 2012 there were times when they did not have enough money to buy food for themselves or their families and had to use food stamps, food banks, or go hungry. Why don’t these people “fuck over” the guys in Wall Street and the City? That’s the great mystery.

Absolute Knowledge RF: “I don’t think there is any way we will ever know for sure where it all started or what started it. Maybe it always has been. Maybe existence just exists. One thing I know for sure is that if you weren’t there, you can never claim to truly know how it started. Anything else is conjecture and speculation from a third party interloper perspective.” Correct, you don’t think. You weren’t there when Napoleon was alive. How do you know he ever actually lived? How do you know his existence wasn’t faked? After all, you weren’t there. Even if you were “there”, how would you know you were seeing reality and not an illusion, a dream? How do you know the moon’s there when you’re not looking at it? All of these absurd “you weren’t there” people are irrationalist empiricists and solipsists who deny the very possibility of knowing anything at all. Read David Hume if you want to see how far this approach takes you. RF says we “weren’t there”. In fact, we were there because we are immortal monads. Moreover, each of us was a component of the Big Bang. So, not only were we there, we actually caused it! Everything RF says is

wrong, false and derived from scientific empiricist materialist dogmatism and faith. RF is stuck in the “sensible” world and unable to reach the “intelligible” world, where the answers to existence actually lie. RF’s beliefs are as pernicious as those of Abrahamism. He rejects the mind, intelligence and reason. He rejects the existence of eternal truths of reason, available to all rational minds. He rejects analytic, ontological mathematics. He refers to not “being there”. Well, according to his own logic, he “wasn’t there” before he was born, and he won’t be there after his death, so he’s not entitled to refer to history or the future. Moreover, he’s only ever in one place a at a time in this world, so he has no right to refer to any part of the world he isn’t currently experiencing and any of Earths’ seven billion people he can’t observe. He has no right in his system of thought to refer to the universe since he can’t observe it or experience it as a totality. He can’t even refer to a moment ago since it no longer exists and how can he prove what happened then? This is where the moronic creed of empiricism leads – total nihilism and skepticism; an all-out assault on reason and objective reality. RF is a dunce, a retard. What’s for sure is that stupid people will never know anything. Truths of reason are eternal. They are as true now as they were infinitely long ago. We have direct access to them right now. We can understand their full ramifications right now. When it comes to reason, then, contrary to what RF states, we are “always there”. RF, however, will never be there because he’s an irrational empiricist, beyond rational help. God spare us from the ramblings of morons.

Bomb the Fuck Out of Them In Operation Rolling Thunder, the first bombing campaign of the Vietnam War, the US dropped as many bombs as the RAF dropped on all of Germany throughout WWII. America lost the war. Why? Because they were fighting against something (the spread of Communism) rather than for something. Those fighting for something always stand a better chance. They have souls. Would you rather fight to be free or fight to stop someone else being free? Who’s likely to win that war? Are you a Confederate fighting against

freedom for slaves, or a Union soldier fighting for freedom for all human beings? In the Vietnam War, The Americans found themselves in a terrible philosophical predicament. They saw themselves as fighting for “freedom and democracy” and yet there they were in a foreign country bombing the shit out of people who wanted to be free to choose a different political system. Like Henry Ford who said you can have any colour of car you like as long as it’s black, so America says you have any political system you like as long as it’s American capitalist democracy. And they’ve continued to invade foreign countries and bomb the shit out of them to further the cause of “freedom and democracy” ever since. Jeez!!!

One of Us? If you are not one of us, you are one of them. There is no middle ground. There is no neutrality. You’re either with us or against us.

Not Human It has been said that we are not human beings having a spiritual experience, but spiritual beings having a human experience. And one day we will be spiritual beings having a God experience.

Negative and Positive Liberty Negative Liberty: Leave me alone. Positive Liberty: Let’s work together to create something magnificent.

The Wisdom of Howard Beale Howard Beale: “I don’t have to tell you things are bad. Everybody knows things are bad. It’s a depression. Everybody’s out of work or scared of losing their job. The dollar buys a nickel’s worth; banks are going bust; shopkeepers keep a gun under the counter; punks are running wild in the street, and there’s nobody anywhere who seems to know what to do, and there’s no end to it. “We know the air is unfit to breathe and our food is unfit to eat. And we sit watching our TVs while some local newscaster tells us that today we had

fifteen homicides and sixty-three violent crimes, as if that’s the way it’s supposed to be! “We all know things are bad – worse than bad – they’re crazy. “It’s like everything everywhere is going crazy, so we don’t go out any more. We sit in the house, and slowly the world we’re living in is getting smaller, and all we say is, ‘Please, at least leave us alone in our living rooms. Let me have my toaster and my TV and my steel-belted radials, and I won’t say anything. Just leave us alone.’ “Well, I’m not going to leave you alone. I want you to get mad! I don’t want you to protest. I don’t want you to riot. I don’t want you to write to your Congressman, because I wouldn’t know what to tell you to write. I don’t know what to do about the depression and the inflation and the Russians and the crime in the street. “All I know is that first, you’ve got to get mad. You’ve gotta say, ‘I’m a human being, goddammit! My life has value!’ “So, I want you to get up now. I want all of you to get up out of your chairs. I want you to get up right now and go to the window, open it, and stick your head out and yell, ‘I’m as mad as hell, and I’m not going to take this anymore!!’” (From the movie Network)

Inheritance Tax It always astonishes us that people fail to grasp the concept of 100% inheritance tax. They automatically assume it can be circumvented, above all via trust funds or gifts. We would need to be the dumbest people on earth if we wanted to introduce a tax that could be defied by absolutely everyone. Plainly, 100% inheritance tax is the title for a complete set of measures to prevent anyone from inheriting any assets from anyone else, i.e. this set of measures will entirely stop the transfer of wealth from someone who has earned it to someone else who has not earned it. You can spend your earnings however you please – but you can’t gift or transfer them to others.

Christianity – the Horror One horrific thing we have noticed – judging by the things they write to us – is that almost everyone raised in minority Christian sects such as the Mormons, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Amish, Anabaptists, Methodists, Quakers,

Pentecostalists and so on – is deranged; seriously bonkers. Their religious brainwashing has literally made them insane.

Natural Law K: “Today someone said to me with 2,000 percent conviction, ‘Nature’s law is different than God’s law. In Nature’s law no one has to tell you the difference between right and wrong – you just know. God’s law is what is given to us in the Bible.” “Um ... so why do you need the Bible again? I’ll take Nature’s law, thank you. And notice how they tried to put me on their ‘us’ bandwagon in an attempt to make me doubt myself. I finally get it. There is no ‘us’. There is no ‘we’. There is ‘us’ and ‘them’. And ‘Them’ is not human. ‘Them’ is crazy! “I earned my light. These people want a free lunch. Why do they think they need a manual if they know they already know the answers? Man it’s getting harder and harder to be around irrational people. “And irrational people are ferocious. They will fight you to the death for their imaginary free ride to heaven. “Irrational people are quitters and cheaters. And they want everyone else to quit and cheat too. They want you to be like them so they don’t have to change. Rational people, non ‘believers’ and anyone independent or autonomous are just in their face reminding them that they are quitters and cheaters, so they devote their whole lives to trying to destroy you so they don’t have to own up to the fact that they caved into a Mental Midget (calling himself ‘God’) who wrote a manual on how to be retarded. As if they needed help with that! Really I am the farthest thing from a mathematician or scientist and I get it. “Weird Al Yankovich should do a remake of the Beastie Boys song and call it ‘We’re Gonna Fight For the Right to Be Retarded’. That’s what it is like to be around these people. Not only are they retarded but they will actually fight and defend their retardation! “Have you ever seen that Monty Python skit ‘How Not to be Seen’. Or ‘How Not to Argue’? Having a conversation with them is like being in a Monty Python Skit. They should have made one called ‘How Not to be Retarded.’

*****

K: “With all due respect to the Founding Fathers, all men are not created equal. I am sure they had good intentions when they said that, but I think it backfired. First no one ‘created us’ and second most people are unevolved, subhuman animal/hive souls wearing human skin and are not equal to enlightened rational Beings of Light. Perhaps next time it should say ‘all men deserve an equal chance in life’ or something along those lines. Christians love to quote that ‘created’ part and it’s sooo annoying! “So now we have unevolved subhumans expecting a free lunch because they think they were created by some capricious Traitor God (or are soulless psychopaths) and on top of that think they are equal... or, even worse ... superior (!) And the worst part is that the most undeserving of these sub-humans are spiritual vampires who think they deserve the most because of the self-deluded self ‘worth’ they assign themselves based on some Traitor God picking favourites and ‘giving’ them more money than other people. No creator god gave them money people! They just took it! And then they wrote a book (or 3) explaining how they did it ... so they can do it over and over again (!) How can anyone not think the author of these books is a deluded, self-serving psychopath? This ‘god’ of theirs is a coward in desperate need of validation because he knows he is not god! Would a True God need to be worshipped, I ask? “All you have to do is ask yourself the following question: who would benefit from writing a book about the ‘chosen people’ being promised someone else’s land? Answer: the very people calling themselves the ‘chosen people’ promising themselves someone else’s land!! They want to be able to steal from us without us fighting back! Wake up people. This is not complicated math! “Where are your balls people??!! The ‘chosen people’ traded their balls for eternal ‘salvation’. Now they are trying to take us down with them. We need Angels with balls! Animals are running the world! Man this is Stockholm Syndrome on eleven! “Did you ever see Spinal Tap? Well this is Spinal Tap!! Smell the Glove! Smell the bullshit! “The Illuminati are kind of like Angels with Balls. We need a new religion for angels with balls. People think you can’t be good and feisty at the same time. Think again! Feisty people are dominant introverts! Evil people are dominant extroverts. There is a difference. Introverts have balls.

We have a passionate, fiery light in our eyes! They have soul sucking black slime in their eyes! We are sexy! They are cowards! “Being a sane person in a mental asylum. Now that is hell. And there is absolutely nothing you can say to them – absolutely noooooottthhhhing – to get them to see how illogical they are. There is not one piece of evidence that will ever get them to open their minds. Controlling someone’s mind is different than opening someone’s mind and encouraging them to be open to receiving new and even esoteric information. We need a new religion with a new manual. We need to replace the bible, the Koran and the torah with Illumination for Dummies!! “No one wants to be wrong. They would rather lie and even get caught in a lie (and deny it!) and be cowards than admit they are wrong or be held accountable. ‘Being saved’ or (having to be right) is really about ‘saving face’. Saving your soul or saving your face. That’s the question. It’s okay to make a mistake. No one cares about mistakes. It’s lying that’s unacceptable. I had to admit that I used to be a paid liar (a PR executive)! I was trained to manipulate people into buying useless crap, junk food and trinkets. Creating useless ‘trends’ to get people off their spiritual paths. Try living with that. That wasn’t easy! “People want to read a book and be ‘saved’ or worship their parents’ paradigm (or money) and then be able to feel superior for not using their own minds. They love rules. Seriously, who loves rules? Some rules are necessary but wearing a hairstyle with dangly bits? (to use your words). No one wants to think for themselves. Is god an all-seeing, all-knowing hairdresser? “You can’t have a discussion with someone who brings everything back to a dusty, outdated 2,000-year old book written by loincloth-wearing tribesmen hearing voices! The same people who believe this shit are using iPhones! The insanity of that scenario is breathtaking. They actually text people passages from a Dinosaur Manual on Star Trek devices! How ridiculous is that??!! Hey ‘God’, the year 300 B.C called and wants its ideas back! “The truth is they are pissed off because ‘believing’ and wearing ‘dangly bits’ isn’t working, and they know it. How many Groundhog Days have to happen before they are willing to try something new? Including a new hairstyle! And when you do something outside of the box or earn something because of your own personal ingenuity they think you are the one cheating.

They want to diminish your light because they are mad you didn’t cheat. When you succeed you raise the bar. They don’t like that at all. “And then I get this: it’s the most authenticated book in the world. Authenticated bullshit! And when they talk about their delusional ‘God’ they have to whisper like they are talking about cancer or herpes. Now there is a book title for you! God has Herpes. His ‘word’ is an insanity-creating virus! “And another thing. We need to put an end to the political correctness epidemic! The world is full of weak-willed, easily insulted cowards acting like self righteous bullies. Trying to steal light! Get your own light! I am so sick of them. No one can say anything anymore without being branded antisomething. They need to grow a pair. “The Sixth Sense: ‘I see retarded people.’ “And animal rights activists are Anatomically Modern Humans in disguise. What about putting all of that hate and energy into a cause that matters. Like education! For beings who are conscious! “And Now for Something Completely Different (Monty Python) ... that is a good concert name! Or T-shirt. Illuminism (on one side) and now for something completely different (on the other). For the love of Pete, please give us something different! “Monty Python must have been enlightened! They are geniuses! To be that funny you have to be smart! “When will people learn that following outdated rules from an imposter god instead of your Higher Self gets you nothing but a free suite at The Hotel California? It gets you a deluxe suite with a king bed and a panoramic view ... of hell! And surprise! It’s not free!”

How Do You Solve a Problem Like Government? Government is almost universally despised. Right wing anarchists want to get rid of it entirely and replace it with the free market. Left wing anarchists want to get rid of it and replace it with “love and light” (whatever that is). Left winger anarchists are ferocious critics of government but have no practical proposals as to what should replace it. They have never put forward any suggestions as to how to deal with the “Warlord problem”. The Warlord problem concerns how left wing “love and light” advocates will stop the brutal thugs who will immediately go on the rampage with unstoppable force as soon as there’s no longer any government and rule of

law to stop them. The Warlords do not subscribe to “love and light”. They subscribe to, “I’ll take what I fucking want and who the fuck is going to stop me?” This is the central problem to which civilisation and government have provided the answer. The left wing critics of government labour under the catastrophic fallacy that civilisation can go on without any government. In fact, they see government as the primary problem and believe that its removal will miraculously solve every problem. A left wing anarchy wouldn’t last five minutes. The Warlords would seize it and enslave its citizens straight away. It’s not as if hippies are going to stop them. Hippie left wing anarchists are the most naive people in the world. Of course, it’s not government that’s the problem. It’s the elites who control government and fill it with their puppets that are the problem. Remove the elites and their puppets and you remove the problem of bad government. Those who serve their particular wills and private interests are always the worst people to have in government. Government must be about the General Will and public good. The problem of government is the problem of how to stop those who are devoted to self service getting into power. The worst possible people for government are the ones who get into government. The answer to bad government is to stop these people getting into government in the first place. Plato’s answer to bad government was brutally simple. For him, the only people fit to be rulers were philosopher geniuses, none of whom could own private property or have any personal wealth. You can’t rule in your own interest if you are prevented by law from enjoying any self-gain.

Mind Whom You Hang Out With “You are the average of the five people you spend the most time with.” – Jim Rohn So, make sure you spend your time with high class, smart, talented people. Given that most people are vile, most people spend most of their time with vile people and become even viler. That’s what we call an unvirtuous cycle.

We live in a world that relentlessly promotes dumbing down and the race to the bottom.

Koranic Criticism In Islam, if you criticise the Koran, you are criticising the literal Word of God. Therefore, you are not allowed to criticise the Koran!

In Islam, Who Was the Father of Jesus? Muslims believe that Jesus (called ‘Isa in Arabic) was the son of the Virgin Mary, conceived without the intervention of a human father or indeed any father at all! The Koran says that the Angel Gabriel appeared to Mary and announced to her the “gift of a holy son”. The Koran often repeats that Adam, the first human being, was not born of a woman and had neither a human mother nor human father. Jesus was born of a woman (Mary) but had no father. To make anything happen, Allah simply has to say, “Be”, and it is so. With Mary, he said, “Have a baby”, and she did. No father was involved. Jesus is like Adam, but with a mother. He is not the Son of God!

Virgins or Grapes? According to Islamic convention, martyrs will go to paradise and marry seventy-two beautiful, dusky, wide-eyed virgins. (It seems to have been thought impossible for women to martyr themselves.) A German scholar of the Koran says that what was actually being referred to were seventy-two white, crystal-clear grapes! If this sounds bizarre, a fifth century fresco in an Egyptian Christian monastery depicts Archangels receiving souls in paradise, and feeding the souls grapes! And each soul is clearly seen holding a small bunch of grapes. In the present day, grapes are seen on the vestments of the priests of the Syrian Orthodox Church. This is a symbolic reference to Jesus Christ’s promise to his disciples at the Last Supper when he said, “But I say unto you, I will not drink henceforth of this fruit, until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father’s kingdom.” So, a soul that is holding the finest grapes will in due course drink the finest wine. It is wine, not virgins, that the Koran promises to martyrs! Wine on earth is forbidden to Muslims (unlike sex with virgins), but not wine in

paradise, so we can imagine that many Muslims would have been immensely excited by the prospect of tasting wine for the first time, and divine wine at that! Like the Bible, the Koran is full of mistranslations, but, remembering the First Rule of Muslim Club, you are never allowed to criticise the Koran! And thus Islamic ignorance is perpetuated forever. The Catholic Church used to have its priests recite the Bible in Latin, which wasn’t much use to ordinary peasant Catholics who couldn’t speak Latin. The Catholics were happy for the faithful to remain in ignorance, and so is Islam.

God Has AIDS! AIDS (Acquired immune deficiency syndrome or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) is a disease caused by HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus). The active virus alters the immune system, and makes people much more vulnerable to infections and disease. As the disease progresses, this susceptibility worsens. “God” is the origin (“ground zero”) of religious AIDS. He infects all his followers with a terrible disease that destroys the ability of their rational “immune system” to detect and fight off irrational bullshit. As the disease advances, victims succumb completely and become wholly irrational, willing to believe any bullshit, no matter how insane.

Betraying Yourself People betray what kind of people they are all the time. People who talk about faith or love are feeling types (Abrahamists), those who talk about facts and evidence are sensing types (empiricists; scientists), those who talk about mystical visions and gut instincts are intuitive types (Eastern religious types) and those who talk about reason and proof are thinking types (rationalists; mathematicians). Extraverts babble on about the world “out there”, the external world, the world around them. Introverts focus on the inner world, the internal world, the world inside them. Martin Luther (“Reason is the Devil’s whore”) was a classic feeling type who hated reason and trumpeted “justification by faith alone”. The Beatles, hippies and New Agers with their clarion call of “All you need is love” were archetypal emotional types, believing that the allegedly strongest,

most powerful, positive emotion (“love”) is the answer to everything. Doubting Thomas was a classic empiricist and “scientist”, demanding sensory evidence before he would believe something (“seeing is believing”). Buddha was a classic mystical intuitive, meditating in order to achieve an abnormal mental state whereby he could achieve a mystical vision of reality. Leibniz is the best example of a rationalist, basing everything on his principle of sufficient reason.

The Merit Lie DL: “You talk about meritocracy, yet bash ‘the rich’. Who exactly qualifies as ‘the rich’?” Note how DL automatically links meritocracy to wealth, i.e. he is trumpeting the old lie that your bank balance is a measure of your talent. Given that genius is priceless, someone such as Leibniz ought to have taken ownership of the whole world if merit and wealth were correlated. The rich are those who have rigged the system to guarantee themselves rewards out of all proportion to what their relative merits and degree of “hard work” could possibly rationally justify. DL: “Freedom doesn’t have a central plan.” Who says? You? Who made DL the definer of freedom? What is freedom without a plan? Is randomness freedom? Well, who wants to behave randomly? You’re a nut if you think people don’t have reasons for their action. And if people have reasons for their actions, they can surely construct a central rational plan to maximise their freedom. Or shall we all go and live in the jungle where every animal is free to eat and be eaten? These anarchists and libertarians are clueless, crazy people. They live in a fantasy world of what freedom is. Should rapists be free to rape and serial killers to serially kill? Since DL believes in freedom without any plan, he surely can’t believe he has any right to curb the freedom of rapists and serial killers, and that makes him as dangerous as they are! It’s amazing how many people think that freedom can be unlimited for everyone. It can’t. If you allow psychopaths to be as free as they like, you ensure the enslavement of everyone else. Freedom – true freedom, the optimisation of freedom – involves finding the most rational way to trade off the desire of an individual to do anything he likes and the desire of

others not to have individuals doing whatever they like to them. That requires central rational planning. So authentic freedom is exactly what DL believes it not to be. This is why you cannot allow irrationalist, feeling types to impose their absurd anarchism and libertarianism on everyone else. JS: “Meritocrats are appointed by fellow-meritocrats and so a new 1% is in the making. No place for what the People want. No idea even what common citizens may do in the writings about meritocrats. Some group on which common citizens have no influence rules over the common citizens.” Here we encounter the familiar Luddite terror of merit and skill. Let’s just replace the word meritocrat with “scientist” in JS’s outburst: “Scientists are appointed by fellow-scientists and so a new 1% is in the making. No place for what the People want. No idea even what common citizens may do in the writings about scientists. Some group on which common citizens have no influence rules over the common citizens.” So, given that science and technology currently rank as humanity’s greatest practical achievements in transforming the world and elevating us from the jungle and caves, how would science have prospered if people like JS were allowed to appoint scientists and to direct the course of science? Well, we’d still be living in the jungle and caves! Here’s the deal. Humanity puts its trust in its greatest, wisest, smartest human beings ... and we all prosper. Or we despise the greatest, wisest, smartest human beings – as JS does – and let loudmouthed morons amongst the “common people” (like JS) direct the world’s future. Well, what’s it to be? If you’re not a smart person yourself, the smartest thing you could do would be to make sure that smart people are in charge. If you have no idea what a smart person is, you had better leave it to others to decide, right?! Communism was the assertion that all people are equal and that no one is smarter than anyone else. No incentives were given to anyone to work hard, exhibit talent, have good ideas. Well, communism worked out well, didn’t it? Meritocracy is about giving everyone – including JS – an equal opportunity. It’s not about giving everyone an equal outcome. The smartest

people will rise to the top in a meritocracy. If they don’t, it’s not a meritocracy!

The Sin Business The Catholic Church turned sin into a lucrative business by selling the forgiveness of sins (“indulgences”), thereby allowing people to buy reduced sentences in Purgatory for their loved ones. That was the true beginning of capitalism – selling people a fantasy!

Indulgences “In Catholic theology, an indulgence is a remission of temporal punishment for sin, the guilt of which has been forgiven. An indulgence is thus not forgiveness of the guilt of sin nor release from the eternal punishment due to unforgiven mortal sins; nor is it a permit to commit sin, a pardon for future sin, nor a guarantee of salvation for oneself or for another. Ordinarily, forgiveness of grave sins is to be obtained only through the sacrament of Confession. “Indulgences have replaced the remission of the severe penances of the early Church which was granted at the intercession of Christians awaiting martyrdom or at least imprisoned for the faith. They draw on the Treasury of Merit accumulated by Christ’s superabundantly meritorious sacrifice on the cross and the virtues and penances of the saints. They are granted for specific good works and prayers in proportion to the devotion with which those good works are performed or prayers recited. “Indulgences became increasingly popular in the Middle Ages as a reward for displaying piety and doing good deeds, though, doctrinally speaking, the Church stated that the indulgence was only valid for temporal punishment for sins already forgiven in the Sacrament of Confession. The faithful asked that indulgences be given for saying their favourite prayers, doing acts of devotion, attending places of worship, and going on pilgrimage; confraternities wanted indulgences for putting on performances and processions; associations demanded that their meetings be rewarded with indulgences. Good deeds included charitable donations of money for a good cause, and money thus raised was used for many righteous causes, both religious and civil; building projects funded by indulgences include

churches, hospitals, leper colonies, schools, roads, and bridges. But in 1567 Pope Pius V cancelled all grants of indulgences involving any fees or other financial transactions. “However, the later Middle Ages saw the growth of considerable abuses. Greedy commissaries sought to extract the maximum amount of money for each indulgence. Professional ‘pardoners’ (quaestores in Latin) – who were sent to collect alms for a specific project – practised the unrestricted sale of indulgences. Many of these quaestores exceeded Church teachings, whether in avarice or ignorant zeal, and promised impossible rewards like salvation from eternal damnation in return for money. With the permission of the Church, indulgences also became a way for Catholic rulers to fund expensive projects, such as Crusades and cathedrals, by keeping a significant portion of the money raised from indulgences in their lands. There was a tendency to forge documents declaring that indulgences had been granted. Indulgences grew to extraordinary magnitude, in terms of longevity and breadth of forgiveness.” – Wikipedia

Anarchy Meritocracy – the Delusion “Anyone who is determined to protect social hierarchy, who thinks the world needs competition to prove someone has superior merit to others is self-deceiving. They are just a new phase of Old World Order enslavement system, the endless process of divide and conquer, selfishness, greed, destruction and conflict. “What motivates people to be meritocratic? Money? Job? Creativity? A job is motivated by money. Creativity is motivated by merit and has nothing to do with the desire for money. “So don’t tell me what you know about Real Rational Meritocracy because those people are deluded, corrupted in their beliefs and structures when they uphold $$$$$$ and power as their priority. “In a world where everyone is an equal leader and given a fair equal opportunity to prove their merits and good work to society without domination or desire of power to rule over the others, that is a good Anarchy Meritocratic leadership. “The Anarchy Meritocracy leadership respect the freedom and fundamental human rights of everyone on earth as one human society without discrimination and competition to rule and conquer.

“The key to achieve this vision is through moral understanding, elimination of power and greed, money and domination. “A Resource Based Economy is able to build and restructure the world in harmony and unity to make this vision a reality. “Anarchy meritocracy is autopilot. It is self understanding and self management in upholding morality of life. You do not need to die hard competing with each other like a psychopath society, you live and learn with each other to a common vision for a better world for all. “Is it so difficult to understand? “But bear in mind, this vision cannot be contaminated with superstitions and religious dogma. A rational, thinking society is required.” – An anarchist Well, there you have it, “Anarchy Meritocracy” in all its glory. What on earth does it mean? We are told that in this system everyone is an “equal leader” – a sentiment echoed by the Anonymous hacker group. Yet if everyone is an equal leader it means that there are no leaders at all. Who is accountable if all people are equal leaders? Who takes decisions? Who gives the orders? Who organises things? Who allocates resources? Who arranges for equal opportunities? Who makes laws and enforces laws? Who punishes? The term “Anarchy Meritocracy leadership” is used, even though we have just been told that there are no leaders, or they are all equal. We are told that competition is not to be used to determine merit, so someone who scores 1% in a physics’ exam is as meritorious in physics as someone who scores 100%. Here we see communist thinking rearing its head. Everyone is equal, everyone should be paid the same, no one deserves more than anyone else. And we all know how communism turned out. Anarchy Meritocracy is irrational, emotional gibberish from beginning to end. Civilisation would collapse in moments if such a deranged system were ever to be adopted. Thankfully, it never will be. It’s full of all the same delusional claptrap as communism and amounts to an all-out attack on people of merit, and the rubbishing of the entire concept of merit. Any system that gets rid of competition will have competition imposed on it – by those who rely on extreme violence to get what they want. Why

should warlords pay the slightest bit of attention to anarchist meritocrats and their silly “love and light”? Anarchy Meritocracy is just a hippie, New Age fusion of anarchy and communism, which despises merit and blames government for everything. Get rid of government and people will all be full of love, light and peace, and everything will be wonderful. Yeah, dream on. Not a single talented person would sign up to a system where there is no government planning, no rewards for the talented and hard working, where merit is deemed an attack on “equality” and everyone is an “equal leader”. This is just a laughable system of platitudinous, irrational hippie crap that does not intersect with reality at any point. It’s as if these people are incapable of learning anything from history or understanding a single historical fact. They are of course feeling types, overcome with their notion that “unconditional love” and “universal love and light” will cure everything. Why don’t you try living in the real world for a change? “I don’t know the key to success, but the key to failure is trying to please everybody.” – Bill Cosby Meritocracy delivers equal opportunities but not equal outcomes. Meritocracy is about identifying the best people so that they can lead humanity forward. Humanity is where it is today because of its geniuses – the greatest humans of all. It’s grotesque for ordinary people to imagine that they are as good or as valuable to humanity as people such as Leibniz and Hegel. A single Nietzsche is worth a billion people. Sorry, but that’s the way it is. Any ordinary person can be easily replaced in seconds. It could take a thousand years for another genius to come along. Humanity will never become divine unless it learns to identify, cultivate and harness genius. Anarchy, libertarianism, communism, fascism, democracy, religion and free-market capitalism have all been antithetical to genius. Genius has had to fight an immense battle to succeed. At every turn, it is opposed. It succeeds in spite of the common herd, not because of it. The common herd will never rise to greater things unless they stop opposing geniuses and start supporting them. Unconditional love and equality will get humanity nowhere. That’s a fact.

The Bland Leading the Bland What’s the point of bland people? We get bland nobodies saying that our writings should be like polite, serene, detached sermons by the Buddha. Of course, such people reveal their own blandness, their detachment from life, their inability to compete, their submissiveness and fear of conflict. Writing, as Nietzsche recognised, is an act of Will to Power. People, such as Buddha, who turn away from life, are not heroes but cowards who can’t stomach the fight. It’s extraordinary that such people should be admired. What next – the worship of the Ignavi?

Anarchy Left-wing anarchists subscribe to the delusion that all people are equal. To this extent, they are communists. Indeed the Communist State was supposed to wither away eventually, leaving a utopian anarchy. Meritocracy supports equal opportunities, but not equal outcomes, and makes no claim that people are equal (except before the law).

Sad but True Many people who associate themselves with Illuminism disgust us. They have zero in common with what we stand for. It’s extraordinary that they attach themselves to Illuminism when they spend a great deal of time badmouthing us, contradicting us and spouting crazy conspiracy theories, New Age bullshit, theosophical and anthroposophical nonsense, and anarchist and libertarian sentiments. Above all, they plainly understand nothing at all of ontological mathematics, and nothing at all of science or philosophy. They’re living in a fantasy land. We utterly repudiate them. It has been said that Jesus Christ would have been burned at the stake by the Catholic Church as a heretic, and that’s obviously true. It’s nightmarish to think that Illuminism could end up as some appalling, grotesque corruption of what it ought to be ... an inversion of true Illuminism. We loathe “moderate” people. As Nietzsche said, “Moderation sees itself as beautiful; it is unaware that in the eye of the immoderate it appears black and sober and consequently ugly-looking.” We do indeed find the moderate ugly, feeble, weak and pathetic. All great people have attitude. No one lacking attitude will ever make a difference in this world.

Pearls Before Swine The number of people outside the Illuminati who truly understand the God Series of books can be numbered on the fingers of one hand. But that’s the way it goes. No one understood what Nietzsche wrote either. He didn’t become “successful” until he went mad. Schopenhauer was an old man before his ideas gained any traction. Vincent van Gogh was dead before he became renowned as one of the world’s all-time greatest artists. Leibniz – the greatest genius in human history – becomes even more obscure and unknown with each passing year. It’s never a good career move to be on the side of the Truth, to be a genius.

The Orange Order While all over the world the people demonstrate against inept and corrupt government, in Northern Ireland, “Loyalist”, “Unionists” and “Orangemen” riot because they have been prevented from holding anti-Catholic sectarian marches in Catholic districts of Belfast. You really wouldn’t believe, would you?

The Whore “Knowing Jesus is a profound ‘feeling’ that cannot be denied and in fact drives everything a True Christian does.” – a Christian “Reason is the Devil’s greatest whore; by nature and manner of being she is a noxious whore; she is a prostitute, the Devil’s appointed whore; whore eaten by scab and leprosy who ought to be trodden under foot and destroyed, she and her wisdom ... Throw dung in her face to make her ugly. She is and she ought to be drowned in baptism... She would deserve, the wretch, to be banished to the filthiest place in the house, to the water closets.” – Martin Luther, Christian (Protestant) hero of the doctrine of the “justification by faith”.

Gnostic or Slave? In the Garden of Eden, the serpent was the Father of Gnosticism, and the first to identify the Abrahamic God as evil. The key test regarding whether

you want to be the slave of the Devil God slave or to become a God yourself is if you are willing to take the serpent’s advice and eat of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge. If you do not eat – if you mindlessly and slavishly obey God – you will always be ignorant, stupid, blind and the servant of your Demonic Master. You must eat in order to attain knowledge, insight and freedom. Your choice. What will you do? Will you eat or not?

The 9/11 Code Those who say that the American government carried out 9/11 immediately identify themselves as anarchists and libertarians. The 9/11 conspiracy theory couldn’t be simpler. Its purpose is to attack the very principle of government, to portray government (any government!) as a murderous conspiracy against the people, and to justify and demand its overthrow. Anyone who hates government in principle cannot belong to the Meritocracy Movement. The notion of government as a lethal conspiracy also manifests itself in tales of FEMA death camps, HAARP weather control weapons, chemtrails, fluoride poisoning of the water, and so on. As ever, the people who make up these ridiculous stories are those who want to overthrow government. The anarcho-capitalist libertarians seek to destroy government and replace it with an unregulated, unrestrained free market where everything is privatised and the profit principle is all that counts. Don’t read stories about FEMA concentration camps uncritically. Always ask yourself, what is the political stance of the people making these claims? What do they want? Are they telling me the truth or manipulating my fears to make me do what they want? In America, the government is relentlessly attacked from all angles. It is now more or less impossible to govern America. The hatred of government appears everywhere, so it’s no surprise that 9/11 – an insane and diabolical Islamic attack on America – should be dressed up as the work of an evil government. Americans know almost nothing about Islam and how deranged and deadly it is. It’s so much easier to blame the despised government than blame Islam, of which most Americans are wholly ignorant. All followers of Ayn Rand believe in the 9/11 conspiracy theory. Is that the company you wish to keep? No one can accuse us of being supporters

of the American government. We despise it and wish to see it overthrown – by a meritocratic government, not by a left-wing anarchy or right wing free market. We want to get rid of the American government because it serves the interests of the rich and the forces of privilege. What we will not do is start inventing lies that it goes around murdering its own people. The people who stoop to outright deceit to achieve their ends are worse than the disease they claim to want to cure. If they lie to get into power, what will they be like when they are in power?

Opium and Gravity Opium causes sleepfullness because of its “dormitive virtue”. Gravity operates through its “gravitational force”. So, do you now know why opium causes sleep and what gravity is? Get real. Science describes, it doesn’t explain.

Radical Feminism versus Victim Feminization The deepest level of the female psyche has traditionally revolved around the Mythos of the beautiful, helpless princess, waiting for her Prince Charming. In the tale of Sleeping Beauty, the heroine literally has to be awoken from her stupor by her prince’s magic kiss. An immense amount of female energy is given over to looking for, waiting for and anticipating Mr Right. “Romance”, in its ultimate form, involves being “found” and “saved”. It’s a quintessentially passive role. The “princess” beams a message to her longed-for prince: “Help me, rescue me, save me, liberate me, bring me to life. I am nobody without you. I am Galatea awaiting Pygmalion and the gods.” Princesses become experts in “learned helplessness”. Their task is to lure men to deliver them from their plight, and so they must be helpless to be in need of saving. A capable, striving woman – a Goddess – has no need of a prince. She can solve her own problems, thank you very much. So, we have an absolute clash between “princess” culture and “goddess” culture”. In the former case, a victim culture is promoted where princesses are passive, wilting beauties in need of male heroes to ride to the rescue in their suits of shining armour. The latter is radically feminist and assertive:

women become active agents of change and improvement, and aren’t hanging around waiting to be defined by men. Princess culture must be annihilated and wholly replaced by goddess culture where women can be forthright and active, and don’t have to play the victim. That said, there is an inherent element of passivity in the female condition. Sexually, women are the penetrated and men are the penetrators. In ancient Greece, it was deemed perfectly masculine for one man to penetrate another, and no condemnation was attached to this act. However, any adult man who allowed himself to be penetrated was reviled and deemed a freak of nature, a woman-man. You were masculine as long as you penetrated and you were feminine if you were penetrated. That was the ancient gender distinction. Homosexual and heterosexual men were equally masculine as long as they were the penetrators. Homosexual men who were penetrated were regarded as feminine and unnatural. The same distinction applies in many modern-day jails where men screwing other men do not see themselves as homosexual. There’s a radical difference in psyche between those who penetrate and those who are penetrated. The penetratee passively waits to be penetrated while the penetrator is the hunter, the active one. Without the hardness of the penetrator (the hardness of the erect penis), nothing happens. Prostitutes can be penetrated by countless men and have zero interest in any of the punters, apart from their required payment, but a man cannot penetrate unless he is actively turned on. He could never engage in uninterested sex because he wouldn’t get an erection. A man must be interested. A woman, on the other hand, can be either uninterested, disinterested or interested during sex. If she’s faking it, a man won’t know. A woman, however, always knows if a man is interested. His erection is the unarguable proof. (Then again, a man might be extremely interested but unable to perform due to too much alcohol, tiredness, performance anxiety, or whatever – this is the terrain of erectile dysfunction.) The interplay between the penetrators and penetrated should be reserved for the play arena. During the working day, all of that should be put to one side. Everyone – men and women – should be active and assertive, and determined to achieve self-optimization, meaning that they aren’t waiting to be “completed” by some prince-like figure.

Anonymous – The Criminal Hacking Collective Once upon a time, we were generally supportive of Anonymous. However, the infantile Anonymous attack our website suffered radically changed our view of that organisation. Anonymous is closely associated with another group called LulzSec and Wikipedia says: “LulzSec draws its name from the neologism ‘Lulz’, (from LOLs), ‘laughing out loud’, which often signifies laughter at the victim of a prank.” Anonymous, no matter its serious intent in some quarters, has identified itself with pranks, porn, trolling and sabotage just for the sake of it. Many people join Anonymous and LulzSec not because they have any political views but because it gives them sanction to indulge what they want to do – which is to have a laugh at other people’s expense. It’s clear that Julian Assange was much less interested in his political opposition to the Pentagon than he was in the sheer thrill it gave him to break through their security. Just as serial killers take a “trophy” from their victims, the information that WikiLeaks gets from hacking is their “trophy”. But they would attack anyone who presented any hacking challenge, regardless of political stance. Anonymous is increasingly a kind of street theatre on the one hand and cyber “trick or treating” on the other. It’s simply not serious and is rapidly becoming counter-productive. Unless it has a clear manifesto and political aims, and actively condemns the LULZ mentality that attracts so many of its members, we are more than happy to characterize it as we have done. The world has to start getting serious. Whom will the elite most fear? – infantile hackers in masks or a meritocratic political party threatening to remove all of their money and power from them in order to redistribute it amongst the people and to invest in the highest quality education? Serious members of Anonymous should come across to Meritocracy and ditch lulz and hacking. We want to present them with a clear choice. Moreover, the stance we have articulated makes it clear that we will accept no trollers, hackers or pornographers acting in our name. Building a movement is based on two things: recruiting the right kind of people, and excluding the wrong type who damage what you are trying to accomplish. Anonymous has done nothing at all to distance itself from the trolls who act in its name. Our attack on Anonymous now gives them a

dialectical opportunity to up their game and repudiate the trolls. Sadly, we don’t think they’re capable of it. We are not a democracy. We are a meritocracy. Almost everything we stand for is repudiated by Anonymous, so you cannot possibly support both positions.

Anonymous – the Hive Mind? Anonymous is the trolling, hacking, sabotage collective of troubled adolescent males and screenagers who interact with the world from behind the safety of screens and keyboards. Most of them are mentally ill and on the autistic-psychopath spectrum. They are deeply alienated from even the most basic forms or empathy and sympathy. They do things for the LULZ – for the sarcastic, malicious, sneering laughs of nerds getting their revenge against the world, and exercising power in the only way available to them. Anonymous claims to reflect a “hive mind”. What does such a term mean? It means that there are no leaders, that there is no single person or group of people that makes decisions for Anonymous. Instead, Anonymous comprises many different people who believe in many different things. The corollary is that they don’t believe in anything: they are nihilists. After all, would you sign up to a group where you had no idea if the other members of the group were doing the exact opposite of what you believed in, doing active damage to your sacred cause? Clearly, no sane, rational person would join such a vague organisation – unless of course the true glue that binds these people is hacking, and they don’t care who they hack because hacking is an end in itself. For Anonymous, hacking is their cause, not anything else. They will hack anyone, anywhere. They couldn’t care less who they’re hacking. Everyone is fair game. The hive mind acts like a malicious swarm, allowing legions of cyber bullies and trolls to flock together to attack anyone who has dissed them. So, is it good to be part of a hive mind? Is it good to be an ant? Is that what we all aspire to? Is it good to be a member of the communist collective where everyone is equal? Is it good to be one of those who have had their bodies and minds snatched and now act as part of the conformist collective (Invasion of the Body Snatchers). Apparently, according to Anonymous, this is what we should all want to be. Here’s some news for you ... ants aren’t human. Humans aren’t hive creatures. We don’t have a central Queen Ant at the heart of the ant colony,

defining the whole thing. We’re not all clones (all ant eggs are identical). We don’t sacrifice ourselves for the good of the colony. In many ways, Anonymous resembles the Borg from Star Trek. Wikipedia tells us: “Borg is a collective proper noun for a fictional alien race that appears as recurring antagonists in various incarnations of the Star Trek franchise. The Borg are a collection of species that have been turned into cybernetic organisms functioning as drones of the Collective, or the hive. A pseudorace, dwelling in the Star Trek universe, the Borg force other species into their collective and connect them to ‘the hive mind’; the act is called assimilation and entails violence, abductions, and injections of microscopic machines called nanoprobes. The Borg’s ultimate goal is ‘achieving perfection’. “Aside from being the main threat in Star Trek: First Contact, the Borg play major roles in The Next Generation and Voyager television series, primarily as an invasion threat to the United Federation of Planets, and serve as the way home to the Alpha Quadrant for isolated Federation starship Voyager. The Borg have become a symbol in popular culture for any juggernaut against which ‘resistance is futile’. “The Borg manifest as cybernetically-enhanced humanoid drones of multiple species, organized as an interconnected collective, the decisions of which are made by a hive mind, linked by subspace radio. The Borg inhabit a vast region of space in the Delta Quadrant of the galaxy, possessing thousands of vessels. They operate toward the fulfilment of one purpose: to ‘add the biological and technological distinctiveness of other species to [their] own... [in pursuit of] perfection’. The concept of perfection is the unifying idea at the core of the Borg. The pursuit of an unemotional, mechanical perfection is the Borg’s only motivation. This is achieved through forced assimilation, a process which takes individuals and technology, enhancing and controlling them. Originally presented as an autonomous collective, the ideas of a Borg Queen and central control were introduced in First Contact. “In their introduction, little information is given about the Borg, their origins or intentions. In nearly all their encounters, they exhibit no desire for negotiation or reason, only assimilation. Exhibiting a rapid adaptability to any situation or threat, the Borg become one of the greatest threats to Starfleet and the Federation. Major characters that have escaped the

Collective after having been assimilated include Jean-Luc Picard and Seven of Nine. “TV Guide named them #4 in their 2013 list of The 60 Nastiest Villains of All Time.” Well, doesn’t that sound like Anonymous? They are transhumanist, technogeek Borg ants. Not a good look! Anonymous have also been compared to Al-Qaeda! What you do is get vulnerable people to believe in the power of the “hive mind”, just as AlQaeda gets people to believe in the power of global Jihad. Neither Anonymous nor Al-Qaeda have a central organisation or any official membership. As with Al-Qaeda, if you believe in Anonymous and call yourself Anonymous then you are Anonymous. In fact, Islam itself is a hive mind where every Muslim feels connected to every other Muslim, and all act to further, as they see it, the Islamic cause. What’s for certain about Anonymous is that R.L. – Real Life – is too much for them. They are empowered only when they are a sitting in their dingy basements, hacking and sneering at the world that shuns and despises them. Anonymous and Scientology are two geek cults fighting it out for mastery of the Dorkosphere. Fight Club – the struggle for the control of the Nerdiverse. Dork Club – where no one can hear you scream (because everyone’s using keyboard, face-to-face contact being much too autistically disturbing).

Dada Many people write to us to say we should refrain from criticising Abrahamism, we shouldn’t use bad language, we shouldn’t be angry, or mention politics, or refer to reincarnation or the Holy Grail. Every single thing gets criticized and we are “advised” to drop it. If we followed this advice, there would be no site at all. We use Dada and Situationist methods on our website. It is a “performance” as much as an information site. Plainly, the message soars over too many heads, but we take Nietzsche’s view on this: “The higher we soar, the smaller we seem to those who cannot fly.”

Islam and Education If the Koran is the literal Word of Koran, the final revelation of God, the sole source of absolute, eternal truth, why do you need an education? The logic of Islam is to shoot in the head anyone who seeks an education. The desire for education is a tacit admission that the Koran is not sufficient for a good and fulfilled life, and is tantamount to an act of apostasy – for which the Koranic penalty is death. It’s nauseating to hear Muslim boys and girls asking for an education. If they want an education, the first thing they should do is abandon Islam! If they don’t then they are neither proper Muslims, nor people with the correct attitude to education. You can’t become educated if you’re worrying about whether what you’re learning does or does not contradict the Koran. Many Orthodox Jews follow through the “logic” of their religious beliefs by doing nothing but studying the Torah and rabbinical commentaries. If you believe in Jehovah, you don’t need to know anything about quantum mechanics, do you?

Tribute Band Tribute band get tribute audiences. A Sex Pistols tribute band gets a Sex Pistols tribute audience. Everyone plays their part to perfection. A roomful of impersonators. Where has reality gone?

The Impossible Police E: “Meritocracy is brilliant in theory ... but it’s impossible to be implemented in real life ... take communism as an example. These systems assume all people are good and life will be rosy ... guys, be realistic.” Well, meritocracy certainly won’t work in a world of Ignavi like E. People said democracy would never happen. It did. People said there would be no communist revolution. There was. Who could imagine that 1% could rule and exploit the 99%? It happened. Absolutely anything can happen. Who would imagine that you could make a world religion out of an illiterate guy with a beard claiming to meet the Angel Gabriel in a cave and having the Word of God dictated to him? Yet here we are with 1.5 billion Muslims in the world today.

There’s nothing at all far-fetched or unrealistic about meritocracy. Those who think it can’t be done should shut up, get out of the way and let those who are capable of accomplishing things get on with it.

The Next Man If a King allows his enemies to strike down his chief minister, he is certain to be next. He imagines he has saved himself by sacrificing his adviser. In fact, he has signed his own death warrant. Thus it was with England’s King Charles I when he allowed his chief adviser the Earl of Strafford to be beheaded by Parliament. Charles’ head duly followed. Ironically, Strafford had earlier advised Charles to hang several of the leading Parliamentarians. Charles refused, and thus showed he was not a man for the big decisions. His enemies had no such compunction. King Henry VIII of England rejected the Pope as the anointed of God, the “vicar of Christ”. What he didn’t grasp was that as soon as he did that, someone could come along later and reject the English king as the anointed of God. Around a century later, Oliver Cromwell did exactly that and executed King Charles I. King Henry VIII got rid of the Pope’s authority in England. That very act was sure to set a precedent for other ecclesiastical authorities to be challenged. Sure enough, English Puritans soon agitated for all bishops and archbishops to be abolished. It’s the slippery slope.

The Puritans Oliver Cromwell led the military coup on behalf of the English Parliament that resulted in the beheading of King Charles I. Cromwell was a fanatical Puritan and, in modern-day, terms would be the equivalent of a leader of the Taliban, or a Jihadist like Osama bin Laden. In effect, England replaced a diabolical king with a fascist Protestant theocracy that banned Christmas and dancing. The Pilgrim Fathers who feature so prominently in American history and in whose memory and honour the annual Thanksgiving holiday is held belonged to the same breed of Puritans as Cromwell. It’s thus not surprising that America remains a religiously fundamentalist nation. While Europe is now more or less atheistic and secular, with enfeebled Christians merely paying lip-service to their old Gods, America in many place retains the same religious fervour exhibited by today’s Taliban.

No Mercy Cromwell worshipped a “God of Wrath” and denied that God could ever show mercy since if God had rightly convicted someone then it would be tantamount to God contradicting himself, changing his mind or even erring, if he then showed mercy ... and none of those possibilities applied to Cromwell’s God.

Earth is Hell “For the world is Hell, and men are on the one hand the tormented souls and on the other the devils in it.” – Schopenhauer Well, who are the tormented souls and who are the devils? Is it 1% of devils versus 99% of tormented souls? Are the world’s elite literally demonic and Satanic? Do they serve the Dark Lord himself?

Hawks, Doves and Retaliators Humanity can be classed according to three types: hawks, doves and retaliators. Hawks are always willing to be aggressive in the pursuit of their aims, and don’t care about attacking and trampling over others to get what they want. The 1% elite are hawks. Free-market capitalism, is a ruthless, hawk economic system. Anarcho-capitalist libertarians are extremely hawkish. Doves are peaceful, docile, submissive and avoid conflict and aggression as much as possible. They are plagued by morality, self-doubt, empathy and sympathy. Communism (in theory) and left-wing anarchy are dove political and economic systems. Hawks are masters and doves are slaves. The retaliators are those who don’t initiate aggression but will certainly retaliate aggressively. They are neither masters nor slaves. The meritocratic “Law of Neutrality” is designed to inhibit hawks. Hawks think nothing of converting the public space to their own private playground, effectively taking personal ownership of it. The law of neutrality will always take the side of a retaliator over a hawk. A hawk committed an aggressive act, so if the retaliator retaliates, it’s right and just that he should do so. The aggression of hawks must be inhibited. Doves will

never stand up for themselves and will allow themselves to be bullied by hawks, so it’s the moral responsibility of the retaliators to fight back since no one else will. The law will stand by the retaliators. When hawks learn that their aggression is unacceptable, the world will change utterly. In a world where hawks are controlled, retaliators will never have to retaliate, and everything will be peaceful and dovelike.

The Withering Away of the State “Withering away of the state is a concept of Marxism, coined by Friedrich Engels, and referring to the idea that the social institution of a state will eventually become obsolete and disappear, as the society will be able to govern itself without the state and its coercive enforcement of the law. “Although Engels first introduced the idea of the withering of the state, he attributed the underlying concept to Karl Marx; other Marxist theorists – including Vladimir Lenin – would later expand on it. According to this concept, a communist society will eventually require no coercion to force individuals to behave in a way that benefits the society. Such a society would occur after a temporary period of the dictatorship of the proletariat. “This scenario depended on Marx’s view of coercive power as a tool of those who own the means of production, i.e. certain social classes (the bourgeoisie) and the capitalist state. In a communist society the social classes would disappear and the means of production would have no single owner; hence, such a stateless society will no longer require law, and stateless communism, a communist utopia, will develop. “The concept of the withering of the state differentiates traditional Marxism from socialist statism (which accepted the retention of the institution of the state) and antistatist anarchism (which demanded the immediate abolition of the state, with no perceived need for any ‘temporary’, postrevolutionary institution of the state). “In Soviet Marxism, while Lenin supported the idea of the withering of the state, as seen in his State and Revolution (1917), other leaders such as Joseph Stalin argued the need for a communist state, primarily for defence against external enemies, and thus the Stalin-era USSR marginalized the notion of the withering of the state.” – Wikipedia “The interference of the state power in social relations becomes superfluous in one sphere after another, and then ceases of itself. The government of

persons is replaced by the administration of things and the direction of the processes of production. The state is not ‘abolished,’ it withers away.” – Engels “The society which organizes production anew on the basis of free and equal association of the producers will put the whole state machinery where it will then belong – into the museum of antiquities, next to the spinning wheel and the bronze ax.” – Engels

***** Anarchists want to demolish the State immediately. Socialists believe the State should always be retained. Communists believe the rising quality of the people will eventually lead to the State becoming redundant. A Meritocracy will retain the State since the Meritocratic Republic is a positive liberty State and its purpose is to optimize human beings and their accomplishments. Anarchy is a negative liberty system that wants people to be left alone to do their own thing. Such a system would end up as a failing hippie commune in which everyone smokes dope and nothing gets achieved – or be crushed by violent warlords.

The Public Space and the Law of Neutrality The public space is for everyone. It’s not for a few aggressive bullies and narcissists to seize and treat as their own private property, regardless of others. Places can be set up for dog owners, cyclists, party animals and so on – and they can do whatever they like there with others of their type – but they can’t expect to get away with imposing their taste and behaviour on others whenever and wherever they want. Of course, the anarchists and libertarians will rail against us and brand us as sinister fascists and totalitarians, which rather reveals how much respect they have for the rights of others who don’t want to be subject to their “personal freedom.”

Big Fish SH: “The Movement was created to catch and spark a ‘Big Fish’ with an idea of Meritocracy, where he/she would then dedicate their life to changing the world based on the life changing information they just read. “The Movement was not created to form countless Facebook pages, to consume and waste people’s time on Facebook in irrelevant debate and

delusional conversions. It was not created so people could regurgitate the information, possibly hoping to get praise. It was not created to enlighten people, or to wake people up. It was not created to herd or to transform ordinary people. It was not created for ordinary people! “If any or all of the above applies to you then you are a part of the Movement which is still looking for a ‘Big Fish.’ The truth is they aren’t looking for you. “Let us face the facts, there is nothing that you can do to change the world, but there is something you can do to change yours, and that is the very reason why you’re a small fish. A big fish has the ability to change not only his life but others’ as well.”

***** AH: “I’ve become very pessimistic about meritocracy and I don’t think it will happen any time soon, unless the people rise up. “We all can sit in the comfort of our armchairs and criticize Muslims for this and that, but don’t forget about what happened in Libya and Egypt, their leaders began playing ‘weird games’ and look how quickly the people overthrew them, without the need of constitutions and all that time wasting bla bla bla. “What people needs to understand is that the elite families of this planet can sit on their thrones forever while they watch us compete amongst ourselves. They’ve got the means, but we, the underclasses don’t, and that’s one of the reasons why changes must happen quick. “Don’t forget that the Illuminati were successful during the French Revolution because the people were literally hungry...”

Corruption “The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently.” – Nietzsche Unfortunately, this is counteracted by: “The surest way to make a youth miserable is to make him think differently from all of his peers – because they will call him, freak, weirdo, geek, nerd, anorak, dork, he will have no friends, no one will like him, he’ll be unsuccessful and on his own ... just like Nietzsche!”

That, of course, is the price genius pays.

The Priest Plot “The fundamental, secret and primal piece of astuteness of all priests, everywhere and at all times, whether Brahmin or Mohammedan or Buddhist or Christian, is as follows. They have recognised and grasped the enormous strength and the iradicability of the metaphysical need of man: they then pretend to possess the means of satisfying it, in that the solution to the great enigma has, by extraordinary channels, been directly communicated to them. Once they have persuaded men of the truth of this, they can lead and dominate them to their heart’s content. The more prudent rulers enter into an alliance with them: the others are themselves ruled by them. If, however, as the rarest of all exceptions, a philosopher comes to the throne, the whole comedy is disrupted in the most unseemly fashion.” – Schopenhauer

False Consciousness GJ: “Bill Gates and Richard Branson ... have both done a lot for humanity.” WTF! These people have done nothing positive for the human race. Their contribution is 100% negative. It’s no wonder the people can’t overthrow the elite given that so many of the people have swallowed the propaganda of the elite hook, line and sinker and admire and support them. In the Middle Ages, the people supported and admired the monarchs who trampled all over them. It seems that nothing has changed. Extreme wealth by itself is a crime against the people. It’s a denial of resources to others; a starving and a strangling of the people. Anyone who hasn’t grasped that hasn’t grasped anything at all.

Disgust “Before my time there was no psychology. To be the first in this new realm may be a curse; at all events it is a destiny: for one is also the first to despise. Disgust at mankind is my danger.” – Nietzsche

The Real Illuminati

People have the most bizarre ideas about the Illuminati. So, what is the key to being a member of a group such as the Illuminati? Well, no ego trips and narcissism are allowed. An organisation must maintain its structure, its discipline, its coherence, its common purpose, its objectives. There’s no room for people who want to continually argue, bicker, get their own way all the time, indulge their own fantasies, pet projects and personal ideologies. A group succeeds as a group. As soon as people start fighting amongst themselves, the battle and the war are lost. The greatest success of the elite has been to atomise the world, to turn everyone into selfish little egoists all committed to self-indulgence. If people can’t agree, they can’t accomplish anything, so all that the elite have to do is make sure that the people never agree. If you want to get rid of the elite, you can’t go around saying, “Hey, I love Steve Jobs, Bill Gates and Richard Branson.” As soon as you say that, you’re supporting the elite, not opposing them ... so take yourself right over to their side and don’t have the nerve to claim that you want a new world and a new way of doing things. Nothing in this world can change until the super rich are cast down and never rise up again. You either agree with that or you don’t. If you agree, your objectives are clear. If you don’t, you’re of zero help to the cause of a new world. In fact, you’re part of the problem. Most people are so stupid that they simply can’t analyze any situation, can’t identify objectives, can’t maintain a consistent position, have no idea what they actually want and no clue how to set about getting it. All they do is bluster and bullshit ... and that has never changed the world for the better.

The Lessons of Life The strong always beat the weak. The weak become strong through unity. If they do not unite, they are weak. The strong as a matter of policy seek to keep the people disunited. That’s why they attack all unions, collectives, communes, absolutely everything that brings people together in powerful ways. In direct competition, psychopaths always beat non-psychopaths. To win, non-psychopaths must prevent psychopaths from ever coming to power.

We are not here to appeal to dreamers. We need realists ... winners. To all the “love, light and peace” hippie brigade, why don’t you just fuck off! We despise anarchists and libertarians. Far from being the friends of freedom, they are its absolute enemies. Haven’t you realised the simplest truth? Their freedom is our enslavement, and ours theirs. They cannot afford for us to be free, and we can’t allow them to be free. Freedom is not a question of what any person wants. It depends on what the General Will wants. Anarchists and libertarians have never grasped this. They think “freedom” means they can do whatever they like, regardless of others. That’s insanity. Everything comes down to one thing – will. All scenarios have been played out already. There’s nothing new under the sun. At all times, will alone prevailed. Well, do we have the will to win? Do the people have the will to topple the elite?

Reality To all wannabe Illuminists, we say, “Who the fuck do you think you’re kidding? You think you’re one of us? You must be crazy. ... Only the finest, only the highest, only the best ... are you one of those?”

The Illuminati Code “Illuminati”, for all conspiracy theorists, is a code for government, the State and secularism. It has become staggeringly obvious that all those who oppose the Illuminati are anarchists, libertarians, Christian fundamentalists or New Age hippies. Left-wing anarchists, libertarians and New Agers condemn money, competition, all aspects of capitalism, authoritarianism and blame the government and State for everything. Their answer is to abandon government, the State, money, capitalism, and authority, and turn to? ... a big hippie love-in (which only they could ever believe would actually work). As for the right-wing anarchists, libertarians and Christian fundamentalists, they want to overthrow government, the State and secularism and put in their place free-market capitalism, operating within a Christian fundamentalist theocracy. Given that the left-wingers and right-wingers are both attacking the government and the State, it can often seem as if they are on the same side,

but their ideas about the way forward are the opposite. They can agree on what they hate and oppose, but not on what they want to put in its place. The actual Illuminati oppose bad government and the bad State that results when a self-serving elite are in charge, but we are in no way opposed to the principle of government and the State, as the anarchists and libertarians are. Sadly, many clowns think that our attacks on the elite place us in the same camp as the anarchists and libertarians, thus people whose views we wholly repudiate often identify themselves as “Illuminists”. For absolute clarity, the Illuminati are committed to the optimization of government and the State, not the overthrow of government and the State. We in no way identify government and the State as problems that must be overcome. Rather, we identify the elite who have hijacked the government and the State to promote their own private interests, wealth and power, as the central problem. We are not opposed to wealth or capitalism; we are opposed to excessive wealth and free-market capitalism. We oppose privilege and inheritance. We support positive liberty, not the negative liberty of anarchists and libertarians. We are not soft, sentimental hippies banging on about love, light, peace, the brotherhood of man, unrestricted freedom, and so on. We oppose anarchists and libertarians as much as we do the rich elites and, in fact, extreme right-wing anarcho-capitalist libertarianism actually calls for nothing but unrestrained rule by the rich elite – just read Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand. If you have any anarchist or libertarian sympathies, any attachment to negative liberty, any inherent hatred of government, the State and authority, any love of privilege or inheritance – you are definitely not on our side and definitely not Illuminists. We are sick of those who attach themselves to Illuminism despite having a set of beliefs that are the exact opposite of what we stand for. Left-wing anarchists and libertarians are united with the Illuminati in hating the rich elite. Right-wing anarchists and libertarians, on the other hand, love the rich capitalist elite but hate what they perceive as another elite, a quasi-communist elite that opposes the rich elite (as described in Rand’s Atlas Shrugged). That’s why Obama is routinely described as a communist, socialist or even fascist by these extreme right wingers. The right-wing nutcases don’t appear to realise that the Washington D.C. elite, the Wall Street elite, the banking elite and the free-market capitalist

super rich elite are all ultimately the same elite. When did the Washington D.C. elite ever do anything other the bidding of the rich? When did they ever help the people? The right-wing anarchist and libertarian explanation of reality is demented because it involves the creation of a second elite that’s opposed to the rich elite. In Atlas Shrugged, the Washington D.C. elite are more or less Soviet communists doing everything in their power to smash the capitalist elite. However, the Washington D.C. elite plainly have as much to do with communism as Alex Jones, i.e. nothing at all. In which case, the whole right wing conspiracy theory disintegrates. There’s no left-wing elite attacking the right-wing elite. There is only a super rich right-wing capitalist elite running the world. They are the problem, no one else.

The Fallacy TSB: “Do the cars you drive invent themselves? If we humans are their inventors, then surely the Earth has its creator.” Go on then – who created the Creator? And if you think the Creator doesn’t need a Creator then, using your own logic, why shouldn’t everything else create itself too, or be uncreated?

Sanity “To disagree with three-fourths of the British public is one of the first requisites of sanity.” – Oscar Wilde

Art? “Anything can be art.” – Marcel Duchamps Therefore nothing is art. If art is a thing, any thing is art. Therefore, if any object whatsoever can be labelled “art”, art no longer has a meaning.

The Constitutional Madness The American Constitution was devised by men who didn’t believe in the Christian God and had barely disguised contempt for Christianity and mainstream religion in general. They weren’t theists or atheists but deists.

America should now be one of the most irreligious countries in the world, so why isn’t it? The reason is that America is a nation of immigrants, and immigrants desperately cling to their religious beliefs to maintain their identity. Moreover, many of the immigrants were suffering religious persecution in their home nations, so their identity was even more heavily invested in their religious beliefs. America is thus one of the world’s most irrational nations, full of religious fundamentalists, all of whom have little regard for anyone belonging to a different fundamentalist sect from them. Religion is the most divisive factor in America (even more so than race), and the source of so many of the poisons in American society. Had the Founding Fathers had their way, America would now be a rationalist, deist nation without any Abrahamists. Tragically, America did not understand their Founding Fathers and their intentions. Americans believe that the Founding Fathers promoted religious tolerance. In actual fact, the Founding Fathers regarded Christianity as exceptionally intolerant and wanted to ensure that it could not crush the enlightened, deist views to which they themselves subscribed. If they could have got away with it, they would have abolished Christianity in the name of true religious tolerance (since intolerant religions cannot be tolerated by tolerant people). Sadly, this was not a practical goal. They hoped that Christianity would wither away if it were not tied to the State and was surrounded by all manner of other, contradictory religious beliefs. That’s not how it played out. Rather than construct hosts of brand new, enlightened religions, the Americans instead constructed hosts of endarkened religions based on Christianity, each more fundamentalist and fanatical than the last. Many Americans in the present day are little different in mentality from the Taliban and Islamist suicide bombers. The best thing that could ever happen to America is for Christianity to be outlawed, thus bringing to fruition the true aim of the Founding Fathers. But we all know that’s never going to happen.

***** Many Americans now regard the Constitution as an extension of the Christian Bible, as their own Covenant with their God. It’s holy writ, the Word of God, and must never be tampered with.

In fact, it’s a manmade document, very reflective of the times in which it was written, and has been amended numerous times. In the 21st century, it ought to be completely rewritten to accommodate the world of today. One of the things it should state definitively is that Christian Creationism is absolutely false and scientifically refuted, and that all of the old religions are no longer tenable in the modern age.

Downward Mobility People have always pursued social mobility: climbing up the class ladder. These days, it’s not upward mobility that’s on the rise but downward mobility. Many children are now destined to be poorer than their parents, and to have poorer quality lives. The internet is steadily destroying the conventional world of work where it was possible to have a large number of people in well-paid jobs. Now, it’s all about internet winners and losers. The internet bosses and entrepreneurs can look forward to being multibillionaires, while everyone else will be working for them on minimum wage. The internet has caused us to re-enter the world of ultra capitalism where a tiny group own all of the assets and everyone else has to do their bidding at minimum cost. This means that all the conditions for Marxist Revolution are being reconstructed. Marx’s analysis of predatory capitalism – entirely relevant in the nineteenth century but contradicted by the fairer and more humane capitalism of the middle of the twentieth century – can now be fully reactivated. Incredibly, the rich capitalists haven’t learned the lessons of history. And, this time round, it’s hard to see how they could reinvent capitalism in any way that does not mean their own destruction (through a mechanism such as 100% inheritance tax, which preserves capitalism but gets rid of the dynastic capitalist elites). Revolution is inevitable. A world of the masses working for minimum wage while a tiny elite are richer than Midas – which is exactly where the world of the internet economy is heading – cannot be sustained. You had better choose your side for the coming cataclysm. A word to the wise – the rich should start studying history and grasping what happens to the rich when the people rise up in righteous fury. All the money in the world won’t save them.

The Past America is now full of embittered people looking to the past where everything seemed much better than it is now. These people are desperately searching around for people to blame for their plight and they have alighted upon government and the State as their great enemy. Right wing conspiracy theorists do nothing but spread absurd nonsense about the allegedly left wing government of America, which supposedly engineered 9/11, is building FEMA death camps, is poisoning the water, is laying chemtrails in the sky and is preparing to microchip everyone. President Obama is routinely described as a Marxist although, like 99.9% of Americans, he probably hasn’t read one word of Marx’s books, and plainly has no Marxist tendencies whatsoever. The American right wingers are determined to hang on to their guns because they believe it’s inevitable that they will end up in armed conflict with their “tyrannical” government. To right wing Americans, a fairer healthcare system means outright communism and tyranny. What a country!

The Chemtrail Conspiracy “The chemtrail conspiracy theory posits that some trails left by aircraft are chemical or biological agents deliberately sprayed at high altitudes for purposes undisclosed to the general public and directed by various government officials.” – Wikipedia This is a classic conspiracy theory. There are no facts involved whatsoever, just endless malicious innuendo about some general government threat to the people.

How Do You Solve a Problem Like America? “This holiday [Halloween] is based in Satanism. It’s a Pagan ritual to worship Satan and call him forth to the earth and the liberal elites have added socialism to it. We are in the end days and we must purify our nation if we are to be welcomed into the kingdom of God. We have to ban Halloween to save the children. That’s how they indoctrinate them you know. Giving them Satan’s candy sacks. Soon you’ve got a country full of children sucking on Satan’s sacks and thinking liberal thoughts instead of

good Christian ones.” – Michele Bachmann, Republican Congressional Representative to Minnesota and founder of the Tea Party Caucus

***** The right wing always conflate “Satanism” with liberalism and socialism, and Christianity with “freedom and democracy”, free-market capitalism and apple pie. Many people, especially conspiracy theorists, do nothing but conflate lists of concepts, people, and institutions they hate. The “Illuminati” are said to be communists, socialists, Nazis, Jews, Fascists, bankers, aristocrats, French Revolutionaries, Tsarists, Russian Revolutionaries, Washington D.C. elites, Wall Street, the Federal Reserve, the CIA, the English royal family, lizards, reptilians, aliens, shapeshifters, pan-dimensional mind controllers, atheists, Satanists, Jesuits, Catholics, popes, hip hop artists. In other words, the “Illuminati” are simply everything that right wing, racist, xenophobic American WASP conspiracy theorists hate. They are the projection of the contents of the disturbed minds of right Protestant morons.

***** There is nothing in the American Constitution to forbid Satanism. After all, it didn’t get rid of Christianity, the true religion of the Devil, the religion of human sacrifice (Abraham and Isaac, Jephtha and his daughter).

Faith Why do so many people have so much faith in faith? It’s impossible to have faith in reason since reason is the opposite of faith. You have to reason your way to knowing that reason is the organ of truth, and if you’re not rational – if you’re a person of faith – you never will. Faith is the ultimate enemy of truth since it’s the ultimate enemy of reason.

Operation Last Chance The Jews are engaged in “Operation Last Chance” to hunt down the last remaining Nazi war criminals before they succumb to old age. Well, why isn’t the Jewish God – the exterminator of the whole human race bar Noah and his family – being hunted down by the human race for his crimes against humanity? The Jews should bring their own God to justice and

execute him before they start obsessing over decrepit Nazis. There are plenty of Jewish Nazi hunters. Where are the Jewish Yahweh hunters?

Go Figure Scenario 1: Abraham, the first Jew, hears an unknown, unverified voice in his head that calls itself “God”. It orders Abraham to make a human sacrifice of his own son and he immediately and slavishly agrees. Abraham is revered by over half the world’s population – those who call themselves Abrahamists: the Jews, Christians and Muslims. Scenario 2: A Nazi soldier is ordered by a Nazi officer, on behalf of the Nazi God (Hitler, the Fuehrer), to execute a Jew (having been brainwashed against Jews all his life). He knows that he himself will be executed on the spot if he disobeys the order. The Nazi carries out the order and is then regarded by the Abrahamists as a monster, a war criminal, an utterly evil human being who must be hounded to the grave in the name of Abrahamic “justice”. Any rational, objective person would say that Scenario 1 is much more horrific, monstrous and evil than Scenario 2. So, why isn’t Abraham, the Jewish Patriarch and founder of Judaism, posthumously brought before the Nuremberg Court and condemned in front of all humanity? The Jews are regarded as a highly intelligent, rational people. They are nothing of the kind. They are incredibly stupid, almost as stupid as the Muslims. The Jews who have succeeded so brilliantly intellectually are those who have rejected Judaism. The great philosopher Spinoza was declared a heretic by his Synagogue and had an anathema placed on him. All Jewish intellectuals have been “outsider” Jews, liberal Jews, Westernised Jews, enlightened Jews, Jews raised in brilliant European nations such as Germany and the Netherlands. No Orthodox Jew has ever been an intellectual.

***** MG: “When I did my deep research quest for the origin of ‘God’ (specifically the Christian God) based on the movement of tribes and origin of words, I traced ‘Him’ back to a soul devouring demon who held the

adversarial position in the religion of the tribe from which the Jews were thought to have split.”

The Fantasy Self Most people live in a fantasy world. They have an utterly romanticised sense of self. They have been seduced by Hollywood, celebrity culture, Reality TV, video games, and so on. They see how the rich and famous live, and admire and worship them, and expect to join them some day (although they never will). They all want to live another life from the one they are actually leading. Rather than change the world to give themselves a better life, they simply imagine a better world and inhabit it virtually rather than actually. A person who is a hero in a video game magically believes that this is somehow transferred to the real world. It’s not!

Loyalty and Whistle Blowing Groups such as the army, the police, the Mafia, and street gangs all despise squealers, rats, and the disloyal. These people are regarded as traitors who ought to be shunned, despised or even killed. The world, however, loves a whistle blower who courageously stands up to evil groups who are keeping appalling secrets. Humanity has a real problem here. Loyalty is always admired and yet whistle blowing, no matter how justified, is pure disloyalty. Whistle blowers, even when fully vindicated, are often regarded with dislike and distrust and commonly find that their careers are destroyed. Here’s what has to happen. Loyalty is admirable only when it is loyalty to a group doing honourable things. When a group is being dishonourable, the true loyalty of a member of the group is owed to the human race, not to the group, and the person must whistle blow. Loyalty trumps all, and whistle blowing is the highest form of loyalty – to humanity (the General Will), not the group (the particular will). The trouble is, most people much prefer to owe loyalty to themselves, their family, their relatives, their group, their religion, and their nation rather than to humanity and the General Will.

Free Speech and the Free Press

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” – George Orwell How often does the “free press” say what its consumers do not want to hear? The free press does nothing but pander to its audience and carry out its proprietors’ wishes. “I may not agree with you, but I will defend to the death your right to make an ass of yourself.” – Oscar Wilde That’s what Facebook and Twitter are for! “The only security of all is in a free press.” – Thomas Jefferson Assuming it’s genuinely “free” and not expressing the particular will of extremely rich and powerful vested interests. These days, there is no such thing as a “free press”, only media barons using commercial products as a vehicle for their pernicious, self-interested propaganda. “The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.” – Thomas Jefferson But not if the newspapers are an alternative form of government – by the rich and for the rich. “Where the press is free, and every man able to read, all is safe.” –Thomas Jefferson Assuming that people can also think and deconstruct the junk they are being fed by the media. “For a free society to operate, then the river of a free press has to flow without restriction.” – condensed version of Jefferson’s views on the press The “free press” must be restricted if it a vehicle to promote the views of a tiny, super rich elite forwarding their own agenda at the expense of the people. “The press is impotent when it abandons itself to falsehood.” – Thomas Jefferson

And that’s exactly what has happened. The “free press” is now about nothing but lies and propaganda. It has no relation to the truth and it is no way advancing the interests of the people. All media empires should be banned. The media must be in the hands of the people. Britain’s BBC, though far from perfect, is vastly superior to all commercial media outlets. A BBC completely separate from the British establishment – with the right to ridicule the Royal Family and the upper class – would be a wonderful thing.

Speculation Everyone’s speculating. Everyone’s a speculator. Capitalism is speculation. Religion is speculation. Politics is speculation. Science is speculation. Mathematics, uniquely, is not speculative.

The Right Wing To all right wingers, are you on the side of the atheist Ayn Rand who worshipped free-market capitalism, or Jesus Christ who hated the rich and ordered his followers to give up all their possessions if they wanted to entre heaven? What’s it to be? You can’t ride two horses at once.

Boredom “Negative liberty” is the type of liberty pursued by those people who enjoy atomisation, selfishness, looking after No. 1 and forgetting about everyone else. It drives the typical family and is the basis of capitalist democracy. It’s celebrated as a “great thing”. Libertarians and anarchists want to maximise it by eliminating government, law and the State entirely. They wholly reject authority, no matter how meritorious it might be. “Positive liberty” advocates are those who want to take part in a great collective effort to change the world for the better. They don’t want to be left alone and ignored by government. Rather, they want a government with an immensely powerful and inspiring vision of what humanity might become. Many people spend their life trying to avoid boredom. This has much in common with negative liberty. Negative libertarians want to avoid authority. They’re defined by what they’re against rather than what they’re for.

Some people pursue great projects. Because they have poured their heart and soul into their aspiration, they are never bored. People who are always fighting to escape boredom have no plans, objectives or strategies, hence are driven by endless tactical means of staving off boredom. Of course, they never succeed, so their whole lives are haunted by boredom. Extraverts are driven by fear of boredom and also make up the bulk of those committed to negative liberty. Introverts are much more likely to endorse positive liberty and to be pursuing strategic projects that ensure they are never bored.

How To Be Engaged You need a hands-on, minds-on and hearts-on undertaking if you want to be engaged and energized.

The Libertarians Nothing is more seductive than the concept of “freedom”. Libertarians and anarchists are always demanding more freedom, freedom from this and that, freedom from any chains at all. So far, so good. But then one simple problem reveals the fallacy at the heart of their infantile way of thinking – one person’s freedom is frequently tyranny for another person, so whose “freedom” is to be respected? Someone might love the freedom to take his aggressive, wild dog into the public arena. Another person might love the freedom never to encounter an aggressive, wild dog when he’s in the public arena. Well, these two people cannot both be free in the same place at the same time. If the dogowner is prevented from having his dog with him, he feels he is oppressed by the dog-despiser and “the system”. If the dog-despiser is forced to endure a wild dog, he feels oppressed by the dog-owner and “the system” that allows this to happen. Scenarios such as this – 100% conflicts in how people judge freedom – are happening all the time everywhere. The whole point of laws and government is to reach some sort of fair, neutral, rational arrangement in which people get some of what they want but not all. That’s known as “civilisation”. If you remove government and law – as the anarchists and libertarians childishly demand – you’d have war on your hands in hours.

These people are mad. They live in a fantasy world where they imagine everyone is free and never in conflict, where no laws are ever needed because human beings will be astoundingly nice and cooperative when government is abolished. Consider these ludicrous statements by someone advocating “Anarchy Meritocracy”: “Anarchy Meritocracy” is when people themselves know how to liberate themselves properly and manage their community and national affairs in moral consciousness as one unity. Everyone shall deserve equal merits to set up a proper management to manage the needs of the community and nations. “You do not need elections to participate in the corrupted voting system of the political game, you do not need to fund any elections to set up a puppet government. “You simply submit your resume and your qualifications to apply in such positions to manage the company on each division of the management structure. The public and community themselves are the bosses to decide which solution is best for them with the right qualifications, cost effectiveness, efficiency, transparency and accountability. “Obviously, it is not necessary to form any form of government because there is no conflict of interest because the monetary system is not required. “Every level of this community has to start up with Common Resource Based Economy. There is no need for war and conflicts upon anything on earth. All greed and domination, subjugation, crimes, poverty, parasites and corruption will be eliminated. Elitism, Monelism, Capitalism and Nepotism will die off in time.” If you can’t drive a coach and horses through this sentimental, naive drivel – that bears no resemblance to any possible world except in a hippie fantasy – then you’re an anarchist or libertarian too. The idea here is that government and money are the central problem, and everything will be perfect without them. Well, here’s a newsflash, people are the problem. People cannot get along with each other. They don’t think alike or feel alike. They don’t have the same desires and interests. They don’t all empathise or sympathise with each other. Some people are psychopathic and born bullies. Some people are extremely violent and eager to use force.

Should people be free to litter? Should parents be free to brainwash their children? Should families be free to engage in nepotism, privilege and inheritance? Should friends be free to engage in cronyism? How are any of these things to be handled without any rules, laws or authorities? We are told that people just need to submit their resumes and everything will work out perfectly? Really? Who’s reading the resume? Who’s deciding its merits? If two people want the same job, who decides who gets it? We’re told that elections are banned, so voting isn’t possible. We’re told that there’s no hierarchy, so there’s no one in authority, no decision maker. We’re even told that everyone “deserves equal merits”, implying that merit is now meaningless because everyone is to be ideologically deemed equal (as in communism). It’s amazing that anyone can actually advance these embarrassing dreams and fantasies as practical ways forward. That’s what happens when irrational feeling types try to construct a system. What they really want to say is, “Love and light, everyone. Peace. Group hug and unconditional love. Love will conquer all.” Because, you see, this isn’t a system at all, merely an expression of emotional disgust at the concept of government. If feeling types are ever in charge of the construction of any political system, leave the country fast! Feeling types certainly have their place, but they ought to leave thinking to people who can actually think. Anyone who hasn’t grasped that people are almost constantly in conflict hasn’t understood anything about the world. To remove government, laws and civilization would be to return humanity to the Stone Age overnight.

Who is John Galt? When Ayn Rand wrote Atlas Shrugged, she was imagining a socialist or even communist regime coming to power in America and attacking the capitalist entrepreneurs who, in her opinion, were America’s greatest asset. What is truly bizarre is that this Mythos has been commandeered by America’s far right anarcho-capitalist libertarians, the Tea Party and the 9/11 conspiracy theorists. Even though no left wing regime has ever come anywhere near power in America (which is a deeply conservative and right wing nation), the far right nevertheless views Washington D.C. as essentially socialist, especially when the Democrats are in power.

Even more bizarrely, Wall Street and Washington D.C. have been lumped together into a single entity and labelled as an elite committed to “crony capitalism”, which is regarded as a kind of socialist capitalism! So, in terms of Ayn Rand’s vision, the “proper” capitalists of America are being held back by the socialist capitalists of Washington D.C. and Wall Street. The bailouts were seen as the proof that crony capitalism is indeed socialism. The 9/11 conspiracy theory is used to portray Washington D.C. as a lethal conspiracy against the people. 9/11 is presented as a “false flag” attack used as a pretext to launch “crony wars” in which crony capitalists are awarded huge contracts by Washington D.C. Proposed gun control measures are depicted as surreptitious means to disarm the people, allowing them to be forced into FEMA concentrations (death) camps, run by United Nations soldiers in black uniforms. This is all part, allegedly, of a worldwide conspiracy to create a socialist “New World Order” run by a “crony elite” who will introduce a one-world currency and reduce the population of the Earth from seven billion to two billion. The two billion will be abject slaves of a totalitarian elite. Behind the whole plot are the ultimate crony elite – the “Illuminati” (!) – who are super rich communist Jews (no, you’re right, it doesn’t make any sense, but who are we to argue with the mad?!). In fact, they may not even be human but rather shape-shifting, pan-dimensional lizard aliens who seek to conquer the world. Don’t worry, even more bizarre elements will no doubt be added to the mix by the likes of Henry Makow, Alex Jones, Benjamin Fulford and David Icke. That’s the nature of an absurd Mythos. Everyone who accepts this right wing fantasy is demented. These people seek the complete overthrow of government and the State and their replacement by fundamentalist capitalism involving no regulation or controls at all. The “free” market will be presented as the solution to everything. There will be zero taxation. The poor will have to fend for themselves. Any sane person can see how this ends ... the same way it ended in Atlas Shrugged – with the super rich elite assuming absolute control and becoming untouchable dictators, with all poor people as their permanent slaves.

Ayn Rand’s fictional hero was John Galt. If John Galt were a living person today, can anyone imagine that he wouldn’t be working in Wall Street, that he wouldn’t have Washington D.C. in his pocket, that he wouldn’t be the ultimate crony capitalist? The whole nature of free-market capitalism is cronyism, nepotism, privilege, inheritance, cartels, rigged markets, monopolistic practices, enormous tax avoidance and tax evasion, shameless lobbying, bribery and corruption of elected politicians, government officials and academic economists. Ayn Rand’s army of anarcho-capitalist libertarians aren’t the answer, they are the problem – the enemies of the people who seek the enslavement of the human race via capitalist globalization in which a hereditary caste of super rich will be created and rule the Earth in perpetuity.

***** DH: “I’d rather have some junk food and watch the Revolution on TV :)” So says DH, a Manchester United fan. Well, no surprise there then!

Ayn Rand Ayn Rand wrote Atlas Shrugged in 1957. Her book was a warning to America not to go down the road of “socialist capitalism” that had appeared in much of post-war Europe. In Britain, for example, a socialist party (the Labour Party) came to power in 1945 and started to nationalize many capitalist enterprises. A National Health Service was created, to which all working people had to contribute. The Trades Unions were very powerful, and many people had relatively friendly attitudes towards the Soviet Union. Capitalist bosses made only about fifteen times the salary of their average employees. All of this was anathema to Ayn Rand, and she feared America might go the same way. When Margaret Thatcher came to power in Britain, she was an archetypal Randian figure. She hated communism and socialism, hated the Trades Unions and wanted to destroy them, hated the National Health Service, and she went out of her way to privatize as many nationalised industries as possible. Under her, capitalist bosses started to earn vast amounts relative to average employees, and the gap has become

progressively worse. All regulation was removed, allowing the “market” to do whatever it liked. Ronald Reagan was America’s Margaret Thatcher and they completely redefined the world. Ayn Rand’s vision in Atlas Shrugged more or less happened. Government and States were rendered powerless in relation to the super rich, corporations, banks and the “free” market. That’s the world we now live in. ... Which makes it astounding that the world isn’t rightwing enough for America’s far right, who want the complete abolition of government and State. The American far right have redefined ultra-capitalist Washington D.C. and Wall Street as pinko communists (!). They have invented the concept of “crony capitalism”, which is regarded as “socialist capitalism”, and, like all religious fundamentalists, they call for absolute doctrinal purity, which means that the free market must be used as the solution for everything, and must replace government and the State. This is a quasi-religion, with Ayn Rand as its secular prophet, followed by “popes” such as Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan. It’s a continuation of the Cold War and the McCarthy Witch Hunts. The “New World Order” is portrayed as a socialist global takeover. However, all of the actual facts point in the precise opposite direction ... to a global takeover by Randian capitalists via the “free market” that transcends the Nation state and to which all Governments must bend the knee. All Governments have been bought and paid for by the elite. Lobbyists for the elite are everywhere. The whole world economy is run by people who have served at the top of vast Randian corporations and investment banks (such as Goldman Sachs). The American far right are the deadliest enemies the world has ever faced! They are the monsters we must overcome. They are the ones trying to create a sinister “New World Order” of rule by an evil, rich elite that wants to enslave the rest of humanity. In other words, the story they tell about the “Illuminati” is actually about themselves!

The Real World “What I say is that ‘just’ or ‘right’ means nothing but what is in the interest of the stronger party.” – Plato

The Will to Power What is it that drives all living things? Is it a will to exist, a will to survive? Nietzsche pointed out that this must be false because animals regularly risk their survival in deadly conflicts with others. They do so because victory yields greater power, and it is power for which all things lust. If they can’t have power directly, they want it indirectly – by associating themselves with something else that’s powerful; in fact, as powerful as possible. That’s why Abrahamists get on their knees to “God” – a being described as infinitely powerful. If you’re on his side, you can’t lose, can you? That’s why people worship the rich (money = power), that’s why they worship celebrities (fame = influence = power), that’s why they worship presidents, prime ministers, popes, CEOs, monarchs and all people in powerful positions. There’s no evidence that people are driven by a “will to love”. A will to hate reflects the facts much more accurately. There’s no evidence that the generality of humans are driven by a “will to truth”. Hardly anyone takes an interest in subjects such as philosophy, mathematics and science. Mythos is enormously more powerful than Logos. Families crave power. Inheritance and privilege are about the dynastic maintenance of power. Friends and groups bonded together by religion, school, college, and class crave power – that’s the basis of cronyism. Everywhere you look, you see the exercise of power, the pursuit of power, the lust for power, the fear of the powerless for the powerful, the desire to make alliances with power. To put it another way, the master-slave dialectic stands at the centre of everything. Some individuals and groups attain power and become the masters – these are the elites that rule the world. Their primary motivation is to preserve their existing power and get even more power. If no one stops them, more and more resources will flow towards them and away from everyone else. And is that not exactly what we see in our world? Nietzsche identified Christianity as a “slave morality” – a system whereby the slaves glorify the qualities of the slave (weakness, meekness, poverty, humility, neediness, the desire for love and peace, for equality, for the abolition of the strong, the masters, the authorities) and demonize the qualities of the master, essentially making these the properties of devils and

demons. And yet, with supreme irony, the Christians then ally themselves to the ultimate master and Torturer – God! With Christianity, power is characterised in terms of good and evil (in contrast with the Greco-Roman terms of noble and ignoble: “good” and “bad”). The “good” master is God. He cares for the slaves and gives them the chance of entering paradise (if they obey him to the letter). The “evil” master is the Devil who oppresses the slaves and will terrorise them in hell if they fail to be true to God. What doesn’t change is the slave mentality of the Christian. The Christian doesn’t want to be free, he merely wants a good master rather than an evil one. The Illuminist doctrine of “becoming God” is the complete opposite. Here, the Illuminist declares that he will have no master at all. Put away all of your delusions about reality. It’s not about love and happiness, it’s not about truth, it’s not about “God” – it’s about pure power. “Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people.” – Karl Marx

Master-Slave Morality “Master–slave morality is a central theme of Friedrich Nietzsche’s works, in particular the first essay of On the Genealogy of Morality. Nietzsche argued that there were two fundamental types of morality: ‘Master morality’ and ‘slave morality’. Slave morality values things like kindness, humility and sympathy, while master morality values pride, strength, and nobility. Master morality weighs actions on a scale of good or bad consequences unlike slave morality which weighs actions on a scale of good or evil intentions. What he meant by ‘morality’ deviates from common understanding of this term. For Nietzsche, a particular morality is inseparable from the formation of a particular culture. This means that its language, codes and practices, narratives, and institutions are informed by the struggle between these two types of moral valuation. Master–slave morality provides the basis of all exegesis of Western thought. ... “Nietzsche defined master morality as the morality of the strong-willed. Nietzsche criticizes the view, which he identifies with contemporary British ideology, that good is everything that is helpful; what is bad is what is

harmful. He argues that this view has forgotten the origins of the values, and thus it calls what is useful good on the grounds of habitualness – what is useful has always been defined as good, therefore usefulness is goodness as a value. He continues explaining, that in the prehistoric state, ‘the value or non-value of an action was derived from its consequences’ but ultimately, ‘There are no moral phenomena at all, only moral interpretations of phenomena.’ For these strong-willed men, the ‘good’ is the noble, strong and powerful, while the ‘bad’ is the weak, cowardly, timid and petty. The essence of master morality is nobility. Other qualities that are often valued in master moralities are open-mindedness, courage, truthfulness, trust and an accurate sense of self-worth. Master morality begins in the ‘noble man’ with a spontaneous idea of the good, then the idea of bad develops as what is not good. ‘The noble type of man experiences itself as determining values; it does not need approval; it judges, “what is harmful to me is harmful in itself”; it knows itself to be that which first accords honour to things; it is value-creating.’ In this sense, the master morality is the full recognition that oneself is the measure of all things. Insomuch as something is helpful to the strong-willed man it is like what he values in himself; therefore, the strong-willed man values such things as ‘good’. Masters are creators of morality; slaves respond to master-morality with their slavemorality. “Unlike master morality which is sentiment, slave morality is literally re-sentiment—revaluing that which the master values. This strays from the valuation of actions based on consequences to the valuation of actions based on ‘intention’. As master morality originates in the strong, slave morality originates in the weak. Because slave morality is a reaction to oppression, it villainizes its oppressors. Slave morality is the inverse of master morality. As such, it is characterized by pessimism and cynicism. Slave morality is created in opposition to what master morality values as ‘good’. Slave morality does not aim at exerting one’s will by strength but by careful subversion. It does not seek to transcend the masters, but to make them slaves as well. The essence of slave morality is utility: the good is what is most useful for the whole community, not the strong. Nietzsche saw this as a contradiction. Since the powerful are few in number compared to the masses of the weak, the weak gain power by corrupting the strong into believing that the causes of slavery (viz., the will to power) are ‘evil’, as are the qualities they originally could not choose because of their weakness. By

saying humility is voluntary, slave morality avoids admitting that their humility was in the beginning forced upon them by a master. Biblical principles of turning the other cheek, humility, charity, and pity are the result of universalizing the plight of the slave onto all humankind, and thus enslaving the masters as well. ‘The democratic movement is the heir to Christianity.’ – the political manifestation of slave morality because of its obsession with freedom and equality. “‘...the Jews achieved that miracle of inversion of values thanks to which life on earth has for a couple millennia acquired a new and dangerous fascination – their prophets fused ‘rich’, ‘godless’, ‘evil’, ‘violent’, ‘sensual’ into one and were the first to coin the word ‘world’ as a term of infamy. It is this inversion of values (with which is involved the employment of the word for ‘poor’ as a synonym for ‘holy’ and ‘friend’) that the significance of the Jewish people resides: with them there begins the slave revolt in morals.’ “This struggle between master and slave moralities recurs historically. According to Nietzsche, ancient Greek and Roman societies were grounded in master morality. The Homeric hero is the strong-willed man, and the classical roots of the Iliad and Odyssey exemplified Nietzsche’s master morality. He calls the heroes ‘men of a noble culture’, giving a substantive example of master morality. Historically, master morality was defeated as the slave morality of Christianity spread throughout the Roman Empire. “The essential struggle between cultures has always been between the Roman (master, strong) and the Judean (slave, weak). Nietzsche condemns the triumph of slave morality in the West, saying that the democratic movement is the ‘collective degeneration of man’. He claimed that the nascent democratic movement of his time was essentially slavish and weak. Weakness conquered strength, slave conquered master, re-sentiment conquered sentiment. This resentment Nietzsche calls ‘priestly vindictiveness’, which is the jealousy of the weak seeking to enslave the strong with itself. Such movements were, to Nietzsche, inspired by ‘the most intelligent revenge’ of the weak. Nietzsche saw democracy and Christianity as the same emasculating impulse which sought to make all equal—to make all slaves. “Nietzsche, however, did not believe that humans should adopt master morality as the be-all-end-all code of behaviour – he believed that the revaluation of morals would correct the inconsistencies in both master and

slave morality – but simply that master morality was preferable to slave morality, although this is debatable. Walter Kaufmann disagrees that Nietzsche actually preferred master morality to slave morality. He certainly gives slave morality a much harder time, but this is partly because he believes that slave morality is modern society’s more imminent danger. The Antichrist had been meant as the first book in a four-book series, Toward a Re-Evaluation of All Morals, which might have made his views more explicit, but Nietzsche was afflicted by mental collapse that rendered him unable to write the latter three books.” – Wikipedia What is your morality? Nietzsche gets to the root of morality: self-interest. The weak define morality so as to demonize the strong, hence give themselves a better chance. The strong define morality so as to depict the masses as a vulgar, ravening mob, as the scum of the earth, as vermin and disease. Morality therefore has to be destroyed and replaced with reason. One should never consider what is “good” or “evil” (slave morality) or “good” or “bad” (master morality), but, rather, rational or irrational (logical morality). Do the ends justify the means (consequences are the most important thing, regardless of how they are achieved), or are intentions what count (the intention to do only good, and to be purely peaceful, rules out violence against oppressive regimes, hence actively perpetuates those regimes)? Nietzsche is right that the great struggle in the world is between the Greco-Roman mentality (strong) and the Jewish mentality (weak). All strong cultures such as Egypt, Assyria, Babylonia, Greece and Rome were nauseated by the weak Jew. The Jew rejects earthly power and instead appeals to a supernatural, cosmic power that, unbelievably and inexplicably, is on the side of the weak, snivelling Jews and even named them as the “Chosen People”. In this grotesque inversion of sanity and reason was born the slave revolt against the strong. Rome itself succumbed to the Jewish disease via the Jewish miscarriage of Christianity, and the Roman Empire, now fatally weakened by this inner poison, fell. Islam was yet another manifestation of the Jewish disease and, once again, promoted the values of the weak and pathetic slaves, on their knees to their cosmic Torture God (Allah). In the New Testament, Jesus Christ continuously promoted the gospel of the weak, while never once repudiating the tyranny, brutality, violence and dictatorship of the God of the Old Testament (which was actually himself if

we are to believe that Christianity is a monotheism, hence the gods of the Old and New Testaments are one and the same). The Jews ruined the world with their slave morality, their vile, monotheistic Devil-God, their weakness and low cunning directed against all higher things. The Jews invented a new “reality” – a total fantasy – in which the weak and helpless could topple the princes and powers of the world, not through their own strength and efforts, but by invoking an all-powerful supernatural deity who would do the work for them. What contemptible, deluded fools!

The Media: The Great Refusal “I hate journalists. There is nothing in them but tittering jeering emptiness. They have all made what Dante calls the Great Refusal. The shallowest people on the ridge of the earth.” – W.B. Yeats

Mogadishu Do you want to know what an anarchist or libertarian State would be like? Just imagine the Somalian capital of Mogadishu during the “Black Hawk Down” incident. Somalia was a failed State. Government had collapsed and Mogadishu had degenerated into competing fiefdoms run by brutal warlords. The city was feral. Civilisation had wholly disintegrated. This is what “anarchy meritocracy”, anarchy, “anarcho-capitalist libertarianism”, libertarianism and all similar variants would deliver. You would need to be insane or a fantasist to believe any of these systems provide a viable way forward. These systems are for slaves who want to be rid of masters and who consider all modes of government, the “big” State, hierarchy, competition and authority to be reflections of the master mentality and of master-slave relations. Given that all humans are concerned with power, the idea that all forms of the master mentality can be eliminated is absurd. They can however be controlled and sublimated for the greater good – via meritocracy.

Society

What is the true function of society? What is a healthy society? – One that gives rise to higher types of human. All healthy societies are predicated on positive liberty – they aim to transform humanity. Unhealthy societies – such as capitalist democracies and anarchies – are predicated on negative liberty. They advocate “leaving people alone”, “leaving people to their own devices” as the highest good. Another type of unhealthy society is the theocracy where humans are rendered slaves of a God. Yet another type is monarchy, where people are made the “subjects” of hereditary rulers.

Will To Life For Nietzsche, Will to Power is Will to Life. If you do not compete for power, you might as well be dead.

Master versus Slave Morality Master morality is a “yea-saying” attitude. It’s dynamic, assertive, aggressive and active. “Good” and “bad” are equivalent to “noble” and “vulgar” respectively. (Vulgar is from the Latin vulgus, meaning “the common people, multitude, crowd, throng, mob”.) Masters are patricians and slaves are plebeians and proles. Masters create, define and set values. They drive the agenda. Slave morality is characterised by “nay-saying”. It’s static, meek, weak and passive. “Good” and “evil” are equivalent to “weak” and “strong” respectively. (In Christianity, Jesus Christ is depicted as a weak, innocent “lamb” being sacrificed for the sins of others – this is supposed to reflect the highest virtue but in fact is nauseatingly weak and pathetic, and offensive to all strong-minded people.) Slave morality is herd morality. It seeks to make the herd the standard of what “good” is. (Democracy thus reflects slave morality.) Herd morality seeks to promote the interests of the herd. It defines as “good” those things that are useful and beneficial to the weak and powerless. It promotes sympathy, kindness, and humility, and is strongly opposed to competition and “winners”. Strong, independent dominant individuals are portrayed as evil. Weak, dependent submissives are the ideal. The history of human morality consists of the conflict of these two diametrically opposed moral outlooks.

Master morality seeks to create values from strength while slave morality seeks to curb the strong and glorify the weak. Christian morality was formed in the context of weak Jews opposing the mighty Roman empire. In such a world, Jews needed supernatural help from their Messiah and God. The weak always look to superheroes and supernatural beings to save them. They never think of saving themselves. The meek, weak and powerless burn with resentment and hatred of the strong. Master and slave moralities cannot logically co-exist. In practice, they do, because of human doublethink, hypocrisy and downright deceit. The masters frequently rule via paying lip-service to herd beliefs and values. Thus capitalist democracy is a master morality masquerading as a herd morality. The elite rule ruthlessly but use the rhetoric of the herd to dupe and manipulate the herd, and build a false consciousness in them whereby they are made to willingly do the bidding of the elite. This type of master is particularly disgusting because he’s compelled to be a hypocrite and publicly espouse the values he inherently rejects. The master who adopts the rhetoric of the slave is a very different beast from the master who regards the slave with utter contempt and never once reduces himself to their level ... their gutter, sewer level. The Nietzschean “Superman” is strong and autonomous. He is not subject to the morality of the weak, meek common people and all those who speak of good in terms of equality, love and peace. He specifically rejects herd thinking and values. The herd promotes groupthink, mediocrity, conformity and the status quo. The Superman rejects all of this and rises above the herd. Nietzsche saw vanity as a distinguishing mark of the meek and weak. Since they cannot establish their own values and believe in themselves, they always have to look to others for approval and to set a value on them. This makes them obsessed with keeping up with the Joneses, with status symbols and everything that they think will secure them a higher position in the estimation of others. All such considerations revolve around vanity. Vanity comes from the Latin vanus, meaning “empty, vain, idle”. Slaves love praise, flattery and compliments. Vanity is a consequence of an inferiority complex. Strong people do not care about the opinion of others – which is exactly why they are able to create new values and destroy old values.

Left-Wing Anarchy – No Money, No Government, No Religion So, this is the formula for a better world according to a left-wing anarchist: “If we can remove the following three sinister aspects of the world, everything will grow healthy as One:” 1) Money. 2) Government. 3) Religion. ... to be replaced with: 1) Resource Based Economy. 2) Proper Management. 3) Good and advanced free education. And who, we might ask, is going to define, set up, organise and maintain this “resource based economy”? Who’s going to pay for it (tricky, given that money has been abolished)? Who’s going to manage it? How will this be in any way different from communism, and will it avoid the same fate – apart from getting to total collapse a hell of a lot quicker since it’s even more ridiculous than communism? Who will stop the extremely dominant and aggressive warlords given that there’s no Hobbesian Leviathan to preserve and enforce law and order? These anarchist wet dreams are pie-in-the-sky nonsense. They could never be implemented. They reflect a naive and irrational view of what human beings are and how they behave. The left-wing anarchist (fantasist) continues thus: “Can you see the difference? 1) Money = Manufactured and owned by a small group of wealthy people who impose illusions for physical control and dominance for slavery. 2) Government = Manufactured and owned by a small group of people (Corporations) who impose illusions upon the masses for system control and dominance for slavery.

3) Religion = Manufactured and owned by a small group of people who impose illusions for control and dominance and mind slavery. Replace these with: 1) Resource Based Economy = Natural order by the people themselves, working for the benefit and welfare of all common people, sharing and abundance. 2) Proper Management = Natural order by the people themselves, working for the benefit and welfare of all common people, sharing and abundance. 3) Good and advanced free education = Natural order by the people themselves, working for the benefit and welfare of all common people, sharing and abundance.”

***** Firstly, money is just a means of facilitating exchange of goods and services. It’s entirely morally neutral. A money-based system can be absolutely fine as long as elites are prevented by law from controlling the money supply and the means of production and using these to serve their own interests. Abolishing the elite is the answer to the “money problem”. Money itself could conceivably be abolished if there were no problems of supply and demand: if everyone could get exactly what they want. Whether such a future is possible is extremely debatable. Secondly, there is no inherent problem with government, only with the wrong type of people (self-serving elites) commandeering government for their own ends. Thirdly, there is nothing intrinsically wrong with religion, only with religions that serve elites, promote master-slave systems and make humanity worship invisible monsters and carry out atrocities in their name. In other words, all three strands of the left-wing anarchist analysis are false. There are no inherent problems with money, government or religion. There’s an inherent problem with elites who control money, government and religion. Get rid of the elites and you get rid of the problems. You don’t get rid of the problems by getting rid of the effects rather than the causes. Bad use of money, bad government and bad religion are all to be opposed. No money, no government and no religion are not the answer. If you don’t get rid of the real problem – elites – you would simply create a world

without money, without government and without organised religion that was completely controlled by evil elites, and was even worse than what we have now. In fact, we have already had the system advocated by the left-wing anarchists. It’s known as the Stone Age! Moreover, what they advocate exists right now. It’s called the Jungle! – no money, no government, no religion. Who controls the jungle? The brutal, dominant alpha animals – the masters of the jungle, the jungle elite. Left-wing anarchists are the most deluded people in the world. Their ideas are ludicrous. Their idiocy is dangerous. They believe that a “resource based economy” of total abundance can be pulled out of thin air. They believe that this economy will simply require “proper management” (totally undefined; how can you have management in a anarchy? – it’s a contradiction in terms). They believe in good and advanced free education. Well, who will decide what education should comprise given that there’s no government and no stated aims? Who will pay for it? We are told that there will be, “Natural order by the people themselves, working for the benefits and welfare of all common people, sharing and abundance.” “Natural Order”. – WTF! How can you have natural order in an anarchy where everyone is “equal”, hence there is no natural order at all but only an artificial pretence of equality (as in communism)? Left-wing anarchy is even more ridiculous than right-wing anarchy, and that takes some doing. Anarchy is a preposterous fantasy. It will never happen.

***** “Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves.” – Matthew 10:16 The wolves will devour the sheep, especially if they’re as harmless as doves. Jesus Christ’s bizarre and incomprehensible statement is the sort of nonsense that anarchists spout.

Saturation Sycophancy So, a “royal” baby was born in England and the world’s media went crazy. We had full spectrum dominance of the airwaves by the privileged elite,

promoting their false consciousness in the simple minds of the forelocktugging peasants. Nothing ever changes. Why didn’t the “royal” family go the whole hog and have the new baby born in a stable – then the common herd could worship it as the Messiah!

The Intellectual Traitors “When scholars sell out, the consequences are grave.” – George Monbiot “In 1927 the French philosopher Julien Benda published a piercing attack on the intellectuals of his day. They should, he argued in La Trahison des Clercs (the treason of the scholars) act as a check on popular passions. Civilisation, he claimed, is possible only if intellectuals stand in opposition to the demands of political ‘realism’ by upholding universal principles. ‘Thanks to the scholars,’ Benda maintained, ‘humanity did evil for two thousand years, but honoured good.’ Europe might have been lying in the gutter, but it was looking at the stars. “But those ideals, he argued, had been lost. Europe was now lying in the gutter, looking in the gutter. The ‘immense majority’ of intellectuals, artists and clergy had joined ‘the chorus of hatreds’: nationalism, racism, the worship of power and war. In doing so, they justified and magnified political passions. Across Europe, scholars on both the left and the right had become ‘ready to support in their own countries the most flagrant injustices’, to abandon universal principles in favour of national exceptionalism and to proclaim ‘the supreme morality of violence’. He quoted the French anarcho-syndicalist Georges Sorel, who eulogised ‘the superb blond beast wandering in search of prey and carnage’. “The result of this intellectual support for domination, Benda argued, was that there was now no moral check on the pursuit of self-interest. Rather than forming a bulwark against popular delusions, Europe’s thinkers turned them into doctrines. With remarkable foresight, he predicted that this would lead inexorably to ‘the greatest and most perfect war ever seen in the world’. This war would be genocidal in intent, and would not be stopped by any treaties or institutions. In 1927 these were bold claims. “I’m not suggesting an equivalence between those times and these. I’m summarising Benda to highlight a general principle: the need for a disinterested class of intellectuals which acts as a counterweight to prevailing mores. Racism, nationalism and war are only three of the many

hazards to which society is exposed if that challenge should fail: if, that is, most scholars side with the soldiers or the sellers. “Today the dominant forces have changed. Now the weak state, not the strong state, is fetishised by those in power, who insist that its functions be devolved to ‘the market’, meaning corporations and the very rich. Economic growth and the forces that drive it, whether they enhance or harm people’s lives, are venerated. And too many scholars seem prepared to support the new dispensation.” – George Monbiot, The Guardian One of the greatest scandals of the present day is the treason of PhD mathematicians and scientists who work for Wall Street and the City. These people are known as “quants” (those who engage in the discipline of quantitative analysis), and they write the software programs on which modern trading relies. They are the new “smartest guys in the room”, the masters of the Age of the Algorithm. “A quant can earn up to seven figures, but sometimes I do wonder whether I contributed positively to society. ... I was working with the best of the best. My bank employed the brightest engineers, chemists and scientists and we were all working together to get richer. The chemical and physics and health industries are worse off because of what we do because I tell you this: if there was a pay bonus structure similar to what we had in the City for curing cancer, we’d have found a cure for cancer. ... Humans just found a new way of being greedy.” – Simon Jones (former head of a quants desk at a major investment bank in the City of London). These quants are disgusting. They are the latest in a long line of intellectuals who have betrayed intelligence and sold out to the rich powersthat-be. If intellectuals stood against the elite, they could create a brand new society. Instead, they have thrown in their lot with the elite and become their poodles, servants and “ideas guys”. They give the elite the technological platform that allows them to rule the rest of us and instil a false consciousness in us. Many of these same intellectuals denounce meritocracy and support privilege and inheritance. They are as bad as their masters.

The Weak State

Those in power relentlessly promote negative liberty. Why? Because negative liberty goes hand in hand with the weak State, the small State, the low-spending State, the State that does nothing to interfere with and regulate the rich banks and corporations that actually rule the world. The big, powerful State – such as Nazi Germany or Communist China – dictates to banks, corporations and the super rich, rather than the other way around. The masters of the world have no interest in the State. They rule via the supranational “market” – over which the ordinary person has no influence whatsoever. Democracy – voting – never applies to the market. Those in charge can never be voted out of office or be held accountable to the people. That’s the whole point of the system. That’s the whole point of private control of the public world. Everyone who supports the weak state and negative liberty is a supporter of banks, corporations and rich elites.

***** Capitalism is all about private sector control of the public sector. Socialism is all about public sector control of the private sector. Capitalism says that the public sector is hopelessly inefficient, unresponsive and uncompetitive. Socialism says that capitalism is predatory, rapacious, unfair and socially destructive. Social capitalism is about the dialectical synthesis of capitalism and socialism. At the macro level, the public sector is in control. At the micro level, small-scale capitalism (the private sector) is allowed to flourish.

New Age Nonsense “Thank you all, Warrior of Truths, Peace Makers, Light Workers, my Sacred and Spiritual friends.” – a left-wing anarchist Warriors of Truth? Yeah, right. Go ahead and try to define truth without using mathematics. Peace Makers? Yeah, it will be fun seeing how they get on against the Warmongers. Light Workers? What, they work with photons? What do they build? “My Sacred and Spiritual friends”? In the context of left-wing anarchy, such sentiments are nauseating. There is nothing spiritual and sacred about anarchy.

Two political systems have never been tried in the world – 1) rule by the hyper intelligent, and 2) anarchy. The first has never happened because humanity has proved too stupid for enlightened rule by Plato’s philosopher kings. The second has never happened because it’s unworkable and inconceivable. It’s a dream for hopeless fantasists.

Headless Chickens “Acephali (from the Greek language a-, ‘without,’ and kephalé, ‘head’) is a term applied to several sects to indicate that the sect has no leader, or ‘head’.” – Wikipedia Anarchists and libertarians are acephali. They deny that anyone is better qualified than they are. They deny that a few special people are suited to leadership roles while most people are hopeless as leaders. What is more likely to prosper – a society with superb leaders or a society with no leaders? To choose the latter is to say that leadership has no merit and is not a valuable quality for anyone to possess. This is selfevidently absurd, and no society has ever operated without leadership, good or bad. You simply cannot have society and civilisation without leadership. Without leaders, there is no philosophy, no direction, no energy, no ambition, no driving force, no incentives, no structures, no institutions, no management, no government, no organised living. Without leadership, we would still be living in caves. That’s a fact.

Roman Holiday The Roman mob were given holidays so that they could go and see the vast gladiatorial games, Christians being fed to lions, chariot races, and so on. Given that a Roman holiday normally involved the death of victims not on any kind of holiday, the expression means finding enjoyment on account of someone else’s suffering, and thus resembles the German term schadenfreude (pleasure derived from another’s misfortune).

The Trojan Empire According to Roman mythology, Aeneas, a survivor of Troy, was the father of the Roman people. So, Rome was actually Troy reborn and the great Roman empire was in some sense the Trojan empire. Of course, it took its revenge on the Greeks by conquering and enslaving them. Greek culture,

however, survived and triumphed, with the Romans adopting it and promoting it across their empire.

The Simple Truth “There is always more misery among the lower classes than there is humanity in the higher.” – Victor Hugo That’s why you cannot allow the private to control the public.

Who Has the Power? When philosopher Michel Foucault discussed the Panopticon (circular prison) in which every prisoner was told that he could be observed at any time of day by an unseen guard in a central tower, he turned it into a wonderful metaphor for life. We can think of God as the unseen guard. Believers assume they are being watched by God at all times and modify their behaviour accordingly (even though there is no one there at all). Imagine that there is never anyone in the central tower. No one actually holds power. No one is doing any observing or spying. Does it matter? All that counts is that people should believe there is somewhere there, someone in charge, someone in power. The Old World Order consists of a very small number of people. How do they keep control of the whole world? They do so through the panopticon mechanism. As long as the Old World Order can convince you they are watching you, you will obey their rules, you will internalize their value system and reflect it, even when it’s hostile to your interests. You do so through fear. The London riots of 2011 were astonishing because they showed that the London police were incapable of dealing with widespread disorder. There simply weren’t enough of them. Their “panopticon bluff” was called. Likewise, we can call the Old World Order’s bluff at any time.

The Voice Many people are attracted to “direct democracy”. Meritocracy has no agenda for giving a stronger voice to the herd and the mob. Meritocracy is about the glorification and amplification of the voice of the experts, and, above all, of geniuses.

Don’t get caught in the popularity trap. There’s always a natural inclination to see how a system could be made more popular, but that’s exactly why democratic politicians will say anything to get votes and be popular. If a system doesn’t abide by its own core principles then it will degenerate into something else. Meritocracy is about identifying better leaders than the world currently has. It’s not about populism and giving the mob a stronger and more direct voice.

Talking the Talk “Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something.” – Plato Well, do you have something to say or are you just saying something? Facebook and Twitter are full of people with nothing to say just saying something.

Apophasis Apophasis (...from Greek apophemi, ‘to say no’) refers, in general, to ‘mention by not mentioning’. Apophasis covers a wide variety of figures of speech. Apophasis was originally and more broadly a method of logical reasoning or argument by denial – a way of describing what something is by explaining what it is not, or a process-of-elimination way of talking about something by talking about what it is not.” – Wikipedia You’re in real trouble if you are mired in trying to explain what something isn’t. Logically, in order to do so, you would first have to know what it is. After all, any claim you make about what it isn’t can immediately be objected to on the grounds that since you don’t know what it is, you’re in no position to say what it isn’t.

Nudity In the ordinary world, all things are veiled. On nudist beaches, where all veils are absent, it’s how we look at people that becomes veiled, i.e. we transfer the veils from people’s bodies to our own vision, so the veils are still there, just relocated. Veils can never be removed.

Performance Collapse We are all performers on the social stage. What happens when you can no longer sustain the performance? In the theatre, the audience is separated from the actors by the invisible “fourth wall”. However, in our social interactions, we’re always on stage and the fourth wall is our persona – the actor’s mask we don to play our part in the social arena. What happens when the mask slips, when the illusory wall collapses, when we experience Burroughs’ “naked lunch”, Sartre’s “nausea” or Camus’s “absurdity”?

Reality Who defines reality? For two billion people, “reality” is defined by Christianity. For one and a half billion people, “reality” is defined by the prophet Mohammed. Without Christianity and Mohammed, half of the world would inhabit an entirely different reality. “Reality” is not fixed and objective. It’s constructed. It’s pure Mythos. The best possible world is the one that has the best possible “reality” Mythos. And that, of course, isn’t Mythos at all – it’s Logos.

Panopticon versus Synopticon Panopticon (“observe all”): the few watch the many (in a disciplinary, penal or surveillance environment such as an office, prison or Big Brother society.) Synopticon (“observe together”): the many watch the few (in a reverential environment, such as celebrity culture or the poor worshipping the rich, or Muslims bowing to their Allah). Panopticon: the “few” watch the many without being seen. They are the invisible controllers (the “somebodies”). Synopticon: the many watch the few without being seen. They are the invisible audience (the “nobodies”). Panopticon: the viewed society. Synopticon: the viewer society.

In the panopticon society, the many never see who is watching them, and are terrified. In the synopticon society, the few never see who is watching them, and are contemptuous. The Matrix is a panopticon society. The Internet is a synopticon society. We need to get rid of both the panopticon and the synopticon. They are as bad as each other. The Society of Panopticism: defined by the few seeing the many and controlling the many; producing a false consciousness, fear and paranoia in the many. The Society of Synopticism: defined by the many seeing the few and being controlled by the few (admiring and worshipping the few); producing a false consciousness, awe and inferiority complex in the many. On the one hand, the elite want to watch all and be feared by all. On the other hand, the elite want all to watch them and be in awe of them. The panopticon and synopticon go together for oppressing the masses. They provide the environment in which the elite are feared and loved at the same time – like God! God is said to watch us all at all times, and we are supposed to “watch” him via our religious devotion and prayers to him. He is to be on our mind all the time, just as the elite are.

Paparazzi Drones The paparazzi have gone airborne! They are getting in on drone technology and using tiny radio-controlled drones to hover over the houses of celebrities and snap them unawares. Imagine the scene in few years’ time: swarms of drones – like wasps – buzzing around the homes of the celebs. If we could, would we send a drone to spy on God?

Tyranny “Loss of liberty is inimical to all forms of literature... The fact is that certain themes cannot be celebrated in words, and tyranny is one of them. No one ever wrote a good book in praise of the Inquisition.” – George Orwell The only person who ever wrote in favour of the tyranny of capitalism was Ayn Rand in Atlas Shrugged. It wasn’t a good book!

Big Brother To govern (from Latin gubernare) means “to direct, rule, guide, govern”. It has its root in the ancient Greek kybernan (from which we get cybernetics): “to steer or pilot a ship”. Metaphorically, governments steer the ship of State. Those who despise government have tried to give the word a sinister meaning, namely “mind control” (!). Rather than govern meaning to control a ship, only the “control” part is selected (“ship” is omitted). “Ment” is then said to derive from the Latin mentālis (“of the mind, mental”), from Latin mēns (“the mind”) and to correspond to “mind”. Thus “government” becomes “mind control”, hence something appalling. In fact, it means “steering with intelligence” and is wholly benevolent. George Orwell continually warned against the corruption of language and now we see anarchists and libertarians doing everything in their power to make all words associated with government and the State seem oppressive and tyrannical. It’s all propaganda.

What is a FinDom or FinDomme? A “FinDom” or “FinDomme” is a Financial Domme or Financial Dominatrix – a dominant woman who practices Financial Domination over men and gets them to financially support her.

What is the Art of Financial Domination? Financial Domination is when a woman obtains money from a submissive man, who gets enjoyment from giving money to her, without anything in return, especially actual sex with her. The man may get Onanistic sexual pleasure from being used in this way, or feel good about himself, or feel some emotional connection. In his mind, he may see himself as the powerful one, giving money or gifts to the woman. He may relish the sheer act of giving his money away and see it as a form of power exchange. He may perform this act with random women, or specific Financial Dommes. It’s a fetish, but one involving the exchange of money or gifts. Many amateur Financial Dommes try their hand at receiving money and gifts in this way, under the false assumption that it’s a fast, simple and easy way to make a lot of money from gullible, weak men. However, it requires a great

deal of psychological skill on the woman’s part. Enthusiasts desire a good Financial Domination “experience”, not any old experience. Another version of this phenomenon is “princess domination” whereby the Financial Domme is a young, attractive, pampered princess, seeking to be maintained in that lifestyle by a rich sugar daddy.

***** The Old World Order are financial doms, grabbing the money from the submissive masses, and being loved for doing so!

Statism Anarchists and libertarians refer to “Statism” as the “most dangerous religion”. No one in history has ever got down on their knees and worshipped the State, so this is an absurd claim. What people have certainly done is expect the State to provide civilisation, society, culture, education, healthcare, protection, law and order and a decent standard of living. The arguments advanced by the anarchists and libertarians are as risible as those of the Jewish freedom fighters in Monty Python’s Life of Brian, who famously asked, “What have the Romans ever done for us?” ... and then reluctantly produced an extremely long list. However, if we were to ask what the anarchists and libertarians have ever done for us, it would be well-nigh impossible to think of a single positive thing. They have, however, encouraged all manner of social atomisation, selfishness, greed, self-indulgence, self-worship, narcissism, the absolute pursuit of selfinterest, all in the name of “freedom” and not being told what to do by the State. Fundamentally, free-market capitalism is anti-State and pro-anarchy and libertarianism. The doctrines of the far right anarcho-capitalist libertarians exactly reflect the true logic of capitalism, namely to get rid of the government and the State and allow the “market” (i.e. the private rich) to control everything. Of course, the “market” is wholly unelected by the people and unaccountable to the people, hence is the supreme tyranny. It’s the supreme enemy of freedom and would place the human race under the permanent rule of the rich, privileged elites that control and rig the markets and use their dominant position to crush all opposition.

Consider this “definition”. ... “There is no such thing as ‘Consent of the Governed’ because if it’s consent then it is voluntary and if it’s being governed then it’s not ‘voluntary’.” This doesn’t make any sense. It claims that people can’t voluntarily consent to being governed. But they can and they do. Why does being “governed” imply any lack of consent? Does being “parented” imply slavery to parents? Children want good parents to provide the best possible framework (domestic government) in which to be raised and flourish. Any sane person wants to be in a State that acts like the best possible parents and provides the best possible environment.

Mental Illness Most human beings are insane. Mainstream religions are insane, conspiracy theories are generally insane (and are in fact quasi-religions), many political beliefs (such as monarchism, anarchism and libertarianism) are insane. You can’t reason with the mad. It’s up to rational people to separate themselves from the mad and build a new, rational society. The insane will then have to find sanity fast ... or slink back to the caves, jungles and swamps where they came from. They will simply no longer be relevant to the human race. Imagine if we still lived in an Abrahamic world where people still believed that the sun orbits the earth. We would never have made any technological progress if priests, rabbis and imams defined what was acceptable in scientific thinking and what wasn’t. Islam is scientifically backward because all sincere Islamic “scientists” simply refuse to contemplate any ideas that run contrary to the Koran. They automatically censor themselves, hence cannot exhibit the freethinking necessary for innovation. Anarchists and libertarians have declared their hatred of government. Very well, they have chosen not to be part of a rational, enlightened, meritocratic State. That’s their choice. No sane State would wish to incorporate inherent enemies of the State, so these people can be given some land – the jungle! – and can go and live where no one will ever impose a law on them. Within a year, most will be dead. Anarchism and libertarianism are self-limiting systems since psychopaths automatically acquire control of these systems through sheer force, since there are no laws to curb them.

The “Code” Many Jews regarded David Icke’s references to reptilian “Illuminati” as a reference to them. There can be no question that the average person who refers to the Illuminati has no idea of what he’s talking about. The “Illuminati” is simply a way of talking about “the enemy” – the big, bad guys behind the scenes pulling all the strings. Of course, people have very different ideas of who these people actually are. Here’s a list: 1) Alien lizards! 2) Jews 3) Freemasons 4) Nazis 5) Jesuits 6) The Vatican 7) Royal Families 8) Super Rich capitalists 9) “John Galts” 10) Anyone opposed to John Galts (!) 11) Communists, Marxists, Socialists, Bolsheviks 12) The Rothschilds 13) The Government 14) The State 15) Washington D.C. 16) Wall Street 17) Satanists 18) Feminists

19) Rappers In other words, the word “Illuminati”, when used by conspiracy theorists, is wholly devoid of meaning. It can refer to anything. For example, the anarcho-capitalist libertarians would never dream of calling “John Galt” an evil Illuminist, and yet he’s exactly what many others have in mind. Each group thinks they’re talking about the same people when in fact they’re talking about the opposites. How can the Illuminati be Marxists and Nazis? How can they be for and against capitalism? How can they be for and against Jews, for and against banking? People should stop referring to the vague “Illuminati” entirely and state exactly who they mean. “Illuminati” is a political concept and refers to the political enemy, whoever it might be. The real Illuminati are mathematical philosophers pursuing ultimate knowledge and enlightenment. Adam Weishaupt (erroneously called the founder of the Illuminati) was one of a long line of outstanding Illuminati Grand Masters going back to Pythagoras. He was a professor of law, religious law and philosophy, and a leading Enlightenment figure seeking to overthrow European monarchies and Judaeo-Christianity. Any conspiracy theory that does not have the Illuminati in opposition to rich elites and mainstream religion is absurd and a travesty.

The Three Types The 100 million full-time workers in America have been divided into three categories: 1) Engaged – enthusiastic about their work... 30% 2) Unengaged – worker droids and drones, with no interest in what they do. Going through the motions, brain-dead zombies... 50% 3) Anti-engaged – showing passive aggression against their work and seeking to sabotage their company’s goals, to talk down the company, and to drag down co-workers with them... 20% So, many companies would definitely have a huge performance boost if they got rid of the 20% of saboteurs. They might have stellar performance if

they got rid of the 50% of drones too! Only the 30% are making a difference. If Meritocracy can get that 30%, that’s all it needs. Of course, others might say that the 20% are the smart ones who see through the corporate bullshit, the 30% are the ass-lickers and brown-nosers and the 50% are the mortgage slaves. In which case, meritocracy simply needs the 20%!!!

The Worst Invention The Jews invented the idea of kneeling and praying to one cosmic tyrant to intercede on their behalf. They were the first to religiously worship raw power, to move the human master away from earth and into the heavens, where he was no longer their ultimate enemy but their ultimate advocate and ally.

The Temple of God “Do you not know that you are a temple of God and that the Spirit of God dwells in you? If any man destroys the temple of God, God will destroy him, for the temple of God is holy, and that is what you are.” – 1 Corinthians 3:16-17 You are your own God and your own temple to yourself. Your own spirit, not that of some alien being, dwells within you.

The Western War The West has been engaged in a long internal war – between the pagans on the one hand (the Greeks, the Romans, the scientists, philosophers, mathematicians and rationalists) and the believers on the other (the Jews, Christians and Muslims). During the Macedonian-Greek empire of Alexander the Great, and the Roman Republic and then empire, the pagans were triumphant. During the conversion of Rome to Christianity, the believers were triumphant. During the Dark Ages, the believers were triumphant. During the Enlightenment, the pagans were triumphant. In the present day, a strange phoney war exists. It’s time for the pagans to win

once and for all. It’s time for the Final Solution to the problem of Abrahamic believers. Are you a Roman or a Jew? Are you a Greek or a Muslim?

Thersites Thersites was a common soldier in the Greek army at the siege of Troy. In Homer’s Iliad, he’s notorious for daring to speak out against King Agamemnon, commander of the united Greek army, accusing him of being greedy and cowardly. He’s depicted as an insolent malcontent and supremely ugly, yet there’s an implication that he’s saying what everyone else is thinking (and Odysseus acknowledges that he’s a fluent orator). Hegel portrays him as a typical person who speaks out against the powers-that-be to no effect: “The Thersites of Homer who abuses the kings is a standing figure for all times. He does not get in every age ... the blows that he gets in Homer. But his envy, his egotism, is the thorn which he has to carry in his flesh. And the undying worm that gnaws him is the tormenting consideration that his excellent views and vituperations remain absolutely without result in the world. But our satisfaction at the fate of Thersitism may also have its sinister side.” Thersites can be viewed in numerous ways: 1) As a bitter, toxic troublemaker. 2) As a brave whistleblower and truth speaker. 3) As a working class rebel (proto Marxist) and revolutionary attacking the ruling class, and justly condemning them. 4) As a meritocrat denouncing the privileged elite. 5) As a “Protestant” railing against the experts and his intellectual superiors. 6) As an anarchist subverting the State. 7) As a libertarian who thinks he can get away with saying whatever he likes, even to kings. 8) As a conspiracy theorist who sees government and the State as hostile to his own interests.

9) As the first free thinker. Nietzsche casts eloquent, clever, ugly Socrates as Thersites’ successor and avenger: “Socrates is the revenge for Thersites … the ugly plebeian Socrates killed the authority of the wonderful myth in Greece.” Socrates, like Thersites, was put to death by the establishment. Simone Weil, taking Thersites’ side, said, “Reasonable words fall into the void.” Nothing you say, no matter how true, can influence the ruling elite. Thersites is the man who does not know his place, and who can’t keep his ideas to himself. That makes him a hero or a fool. He’s the man who questions authority, who challenges his superiors, who speaks “truth” to power. Thersites may be the first working class hero, the first rebel, the first Marxist revolutionary, but it’s also possible that he’s the first critic, the first anarchist, the first Protestant, the first whiner and whinger, the first conspiracy theorist – the idiot who talks a good game but knows nothing, the moron who believes his own propaganda and thinks he’s smarter than everyone else. Some people have valid criticisms of the State; others are poisonous narcissists who hate the State because it dares to impose duties and obligations on them. Thersites is either hero or villain. His is the first appearance on the world stage of the commoner who speaks out against authority.

The Three Stages “Every revolutionary idea seems to evoke three stages of reaction. They may be summed up by the phrases: (1) It’s completely impossible. (2) It’s possible, but it’s not worth doing. (3) I said it was a good idea all along.” – Arthur C. Clarke

The Syrian Civil War It’s said that Cain killed Abel in a cave at the foot of a mountain overlooking Damascus, capital of Syria. No wonder they Syrians are at each other’s throats!

The Right Wing

“The [right wing] make a cynical calculation: in difficult times, fear trumps hope.” – Vince Cable The right wing – led by the rich and powerful – are always attracted to using scare tactics to intimidate and bully the left the wing (generally the poor and downtrodden).

It’s Not War Cheerleading = “competitive cheering.” WTF! At political rallies, competitive applause takes place, designed to show favour for one candidate over another, or solidarity with one party over another.

The Dunning–Kruger Effect The Dunning–Kruger effect: Stupid people think they are smarter than they are; Smart people think they are stupider than they are. “The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which unskilled individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly rating their ability much higher than average. This bias is attributed to a metacognitive inability of the unskilled to recognize their mistakes. “Actual competence may weaken self-confidence, as competent individuals may falsely assume that others have an equivalent understanding. David Dunning and Justin Kruger of Cornell University conclude, ‘the miscalibration of the incompetent stems from an error about the self, whereas the miscalibration of the highly competent stems from an error about others’.” – Wikipedia The Dunning–Kruger effect tells us that stupid people overestimate their intelligence in relation to others while smart people underestimate theirs. Stupid people are insufficiently critical of themselves, and smart people are overly critical. The Dunning–Kruger effect explains much of the madness of our world. Stupid people – such as Abrahamists – become convinced that they are right, especially when they surrounded by people reinforcing their views and cutting themselves off from critics. Conspiracy theorists are convinced that they are right and can’t bring any critical faculties to bear. The “Protestant” is convinced he’s right, that he knows better than any expert. Anarchists and libertarians think they know better than the world’s greatest

political philosophers. People from privileged backgrounds – accustomed to everyone telling them how important and wonderful they are – massively overestimate their own intelligence and that of their cronies, and end up making catastrophic errors, such as those of 2008 that brought the global economy to the verge of collapse. There are inept and stupid people everywhere who have no idea of just how inept and stupid they are, and, indeed, actually hold the opposite view of themselves, seeing themselves as highly competent and intelligent. As a corollary, inept and stupid people fail to recognise the competence, skill and intelligence in others, hence have no grasp of the concept of merit.

***** The Dunning and Kruger position is summed up by the title of the following paper: “Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One’s Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments.” It has been said that “poor performers do not learn from feedback suggesting a need to improve” (Ehrlinger et al.). What’s for sure is that the elite who run our world never learn from feedback indicating a need for dramatic improvement. Their opinion of themselves is so overinflated that they believe they actually deserve to be obscenely rich, out of all proportion to their exceptionally meagre merits.

***** “I know that I know nothing.” – Socrates “Real knowledge is to know the extent of one’s ignorance.” – Confucius “The Foole doth thinke he is wise, but the wiseman knowes himselfe to be a Foole.” – Shakespeare “One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision.” – Bertrand Russell “It is not doubt, it is certainty that makes men mad.” – Nietzsche “Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge.” – Charles Darwin

It’s about time stupid and inept people were told to their faces just how stupid and inept they really are. Let’s stop using the sugar pill. Let’s start using the harsh truth.

***** One of the main reasons why the world goes haywire is social pressure. This is why large numbers of stupid people can drive the world towards total stupidity. Consider the following: The Spiral of Silence, Social Proof and Normative Social Influence, as described below:

The Spiral of Silence “The spiral of silence is a political science and mass communication theory propounded by the German political scientist Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann. Spiral of silence theory describes the process by which one opinion becomes dominant as those who perceive their opinion to be in the minority do not speak up because society threatens individuals with fear of isolation.” – Wikipedia

Social Proof “Social proof, also known as informational social influence, is a psychological phenomenon where people assume the actions of others in an attempt to reflect correct behaviour for a given situation. This effect is prominent in ambiguous social situations where people are unable to determine the appropriate mode of behaviour, and is driven by the assumption that surrounding people possess more knowledge about the situation. “The effects of social influence can be seen in the tendency of large groups to conform to choices which may be either correct or mistaken, a phenomenon sometimes referred to as herd behaviour. Although social proof reflects a rational motive to take into account the information possessed by others, formal analysis shows that it can cause people to converge too quickly upon a single choice, so that decisions of even large groups of individuals may be grounded in very little information. “Social proof is a type of conformity. When a person is in a situation where they are unsure of the correct way to behave, they will often look to others for cues concerning the correct behaviour. When ‘we conform

because we believe that other’s interpretation of an ambiguous situation is more accurate than ours and will help us choose an appropriate course of action,’ it is informational social influence. This is contrasted with normative social influence wherein a person conforms to be liked or accepted by others. “Social proof often leads not only to public compliance (conforming to the behaviour of others publicly without necessarily believing it is correct) but also private acceptance (conforming out of a genuine belief that others are correct). Social proof is more powerful when being accurate is more important and when others are perceived as especially knowledgeable.” – Wikipedia

Normative Social Influence “Normative social influence is a type of social influence leading to conformity. It is defined as ‘the influence of other people that leads us to conform in order to be liked and accepted by them.’ Normative social influence’s power stems from the human identity as a social creature, with a need for companionship and association. This fact often leads to people exhibiting public compliance – but not necessarily private acceptance – of the group’s social norms in order to be accepted by the group. Social norms refers to the unwritten rules that govern social behaviour. These are customary standards for behaviour that are widely shared by members of a culture. Normative social influence can also be referred to as ‘normative influence,’ a phenomenon occurring when another person’s behaviour provides information about what is appropriate.” – Wikipedia

The School for Scoundrels School for Scoundrels: a 1960 British comedy. “Well, gentlemen, lifemanship is the science of being one up on your opponents at all times. It is the art of making him feel that somewhere, somehow he has become less than you – less desirable, less worthy – less blessed.” – Dr Potter We live in zero-sum game. If one person is up, another person is down. “He who is not one up is one down.” – Dr Potter

Most of us are born losers. In fact, we were born to lose. Our purpose is to lose. And most of us deserve to lose. Consider the new baby of the English royal family. This baby, because of its “blue blood”, is a natural born winner. It doesn’t need to do anything to win. It is simply handed victory on a plate. This baby will be extremely rich, get all the finest treatment, live in luxury and be treated, literally, like royalty. He gets all of this just by virtue of the identity of his parents, and not because of a single thing he did. You think that’s fair, just, moral? You’re a loser if you accept this state of affairs, yet, or course, most people not only accept it but revel in it and celebrate it. They wave flags and cheer their oppressors and slavemasters. The world is all about winners and losers, top dogs and underdogs, alphas and betas, successes and failures. The privileged elite are at the top and they’re not going to let you join them. Why should they? What’s in it for them? Then there are the charmers and cheaters who will say and do anything to climb the tree. They want to succeed with minimum effort, without having done any of the hard work that earns merit. We live in a world of scoundrels. There’s nothing comic about them. They’re vampires sucking our lifeblood from us.

Capital Sociologist Pierre Bourdieu asserted that there are several types of capital: 1) Economic capital: “rich man’s” capital - conventional capital, associated with economic resources (cash and assets). 2) Social capital: “crony” capital associated with the clubs, societies and networks to which you belong. 3) Cultural capital: “snob” capital associated with how well you know the culture of the ruling elite. 4) Human capital: “merit” capital associated with expert knowledge in rarefied technical fields such as mathematics, science, engineering and technology. Human capital is very different from cultural capital since most of the ruling elite have extremely little human capital, hence look down their noses at it, seeing it as something that geeks, dorks and nerds accumulate. This is Logos capital.

5) Symbolic capital: “magic” capital associated with bloodline, honours, prestige, prizes, medals, heroism, bravery, awards, status, fame, recognition, celebrity, religion, iconography, reputation. This is Mythos capital. This is the essence of propaganda.

HyperHumanity Humanity is a single biological species but has split into two different mental species labelled Mythos and Logos. The Mythos species is driven by emotional stories, not by facts, evidence or rational arguments. Christians believe that the all-powerful Creator of the universe, rather than simply sort out Earth’s problems, chose to be born of a 14-year-old Jewish “virgin”, have himself arrested by the Romans and crucified, then resurrect himself, while taking great care to be seen only by his most fanatical supporters and not by anyone who didn’t believe in him. The Jews believe that Moses went up a mountain and received two stone tablets of the Ten Commandments, written by God’s fiery finger. The Muslims believe that the illiterate “prophet” Mohammed went into a cave and had the Word of God dictated to him by the Angel Gabriel. These are all staggeringly far-fetched claims, more or less comically absurd, that would surely require the strongest possible evidence before anyone could take them seriously. Yet they are not supported by any facts or evidence at all, and they wholly contradict reason. You are required to have “faith” in them. The Enlightenment – the Age of Reason – was when a new human mental species came to the fore – Logos humanity. It was born in ancient Greece but proved unable to beat the endarkened forces of faith. Its hour finally came when reason gained traction in the world through the unarguable success of science. However, only a fraction of the human race benefited from the Enlightenment. Most of the world is as benighted as ever, locked into Mythos and faith. Islam has had no Enlightenment and continues to reject more or less all knowledge generated since the appearance of the Koran. Who needs knowledge when you have the “infallible truth” written by God himself? Another force of irrationalism has now conquered the world. It’s not a religious Mythos but an economic Mythos – free-market capitalism. Its advocates have absolute faith that irrational markets reflecting ineradicable selfishness and self-interest generate an “invisible hand” (i.e. God or, more

accurately, Mammon) that miraculously resolves all of the problems of the world. Even scientific materialism is a Mythos – the sensory Mythos – which asserts that “rational unobservables”, undetectable by the senses, simply cannot exist. Thus science, although it’s based on mathematics, irrationally accepts only the “positive real numbers” subset of mathematics while rejecting imaginary numbers entirely, barely tolerating negative real numbers and absolutely forbidding zero and infinity. Scientists provide no sufficient reason why reality should miraculously choose to be expressed only through positive real numbers, and that all other numbers are somehow unreal and fantastical. HyperHumanity is the upgrade of Logos humanity that advocates Hyperrationalism. The next Great Age will be that of Hyperreason when Mythos is finally cast down. Abrahamism and free-market capitalism will both fall. Moreover, the half-baked, incomplete, irrational subset of mathematics known as scientific materialism will also perish, and be replaced by ontological mathematics. The Ultimate Enlightenment – the Age of Hyperreason – led by higher humanity (the HyperHumans) will power humanity ahead to a Star Trek future where we travel the physical galaxies in starships, and thence to mental galaxies that we traverse in vessels of the purest light. “Old” Humanity, stuck in its irrational Mythos past, will become extinct. The future is about the new human race – HyperHumanity. Do you belong to the Illuminated Ones, the Shining Ones, the Divine Ones, or are you on your knees to some story-book God, an irrational market or irrational devotion to your physical senses? HyperHumanity is not here to help Old Humanity. It is here to replace it! We are the true human race, that which seeks to claim its rightful prize – divinity.

The God Blunder What is the most ingenious error in the history of science, so difficult to detect that only a genius could manage it? “In any collection of data, the figure most obviously correct, beyond all need of checking, is the mistake.” – Finagle’s Third Law (Arthur Bloch)

One of the foundation stones of modern physics – the most obviously correct, beyond all need of checking and devised by one of the greatest geniuses of all – is the catastrophic blunder that is preventing scientists from unifying quantum theory and general relativity. Join us on the strangest detective case of all – finding the weapon that has murdered science. This is the ultimate whodunnit.

The Last Man Who Knew Everything Three hundred years ago, it was still possible for an intelligent person to have read all of the books that constituted the whole knowledge base of the world. Three hundred years ago, most intelligent people in the world believed that the world was a holistic, living organism of some kind, imbued with mind and divinity: matter was alive (hylozoism), or mind was everywhere (panpsychism), or God was involved in everything, everywhere (theism), or God and Nature were one (pantheism). A hundred years later, the world had become immensely specialized and complex, and the world was increasingly viewed by intelligent people as a vast, purposeless, clockwork mechanism. Either there was no God (atheism), or he was an extremely remote God of Rational Laws (deism) and not of revelation and personal salvation. Leibniz was the last genius to truly know everything and to accept that the universe was an organism rather than a machine. It was a very special type of organism – a mathematical organism. Leibniz had another secret claim to fame – he was the author of the Illuminati’s Grand Unified Theory of Everything based on pure “nothing”. He created an entire universe out of a “Big Bang” singularity comprising infinite “monads” (zeros), each with infinite energy capacity. This is the story of the first mathematical Theory of Everything, which remains valid to this day as the true explanation of reality. Leibniz’s monads have one last, incredible secret to reveal: they are actually souls!

The Banking System “I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control

the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.” – Thomas Jefferson This quotation, attributed to Jefferson, is actually a fabricated embellishment of an authentic quotation by Jefferson: “And I sincerely believe, with you, that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies; and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale.” What is crystal clear is that Jefferson is attacking the private banking system that underpins, to this day, free-market capitalism. Amazingly, anarcho-capitalist libertarians choose to interpret Jefferson’s words as an all-out attack on the Federal Reserve so that they can bash the government and its institutions yet again, while wholly failing to get the point: the people must be in charge of the banking systems, not private capitalists and their political cronies in Washington D.C. The banks do indeed properly belong to the people, and that means State, accountable control of the hitherto private, unaccountable banks.

***** “Paper is Poverty. It is only the ghost of money, and not money itself.” – Thomas Jefferson “We are now taught to believe that legerdemain tricks upon paper can produce as solid wealth as hard labour in the earth. It is vain for common sense to urge that nothing can produce but nothing; that it is an idle dream to believe in a philosopher’s stone which is to turn everything to gold, and to redeem man from the original sentence of his Maker, ‘in the sweat of his brow shall he eat his bread.’” – Thomas Jefferson Jefferson was complaining about what we now call Wall Street casino banking, financial speculation, predatory capitalism, international finance, capitalist globalism, usury, making money from money. To print money without linking it to any actual work, to any products, services or assets was literally to conjure money out of thin air – like magic! Where did all this

extra, magic money end up? In the pockets of the rich, those who printed it in the first place – the bankers!

Mythos Preachers “Street” preachers set up a pitch in the middle of the street and start rambling on incoherently about “Jesus loves you”, and “Jesus died for you”. These people never mention mathematics, science, philosophy, engineering or technology. There’s no such thing as a mad Logos street preacher, only mad Mythos preachers. People in mental asylums never engage in elaborate mathematical, scientific, philosophical, engineering or technological projects. If they are not in a stupor, they will look to conspiracy theories and religions, i.e. Mythos projects. Mythos is associated with madness in a way that Logos never is. Certainly, Logos thinkers can go mad, but only after their minds have degenerated and lost their Logos abilities (as in the case of Nietzsche). You can’t perform Logos work if you are insane. Mythos, on the other hand, is more or less defined by insanity. All preachers are mentally ill and spout unbelievable drivel. Moses (judging from the Torah), Jesus Christ (judging from the Bible) and Mohammed (judging from the Koran) were lunatics. And what about David Icke with his shapeshifting, pandimensional alien lizards living on a moon base?

Autistic Games Studies have shown that children with an autism spectrum disorder spend around twice as much time playing video games as kids without a developmental disability. Autistic children or those suffering attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are also much more likely to suffer from gaming addictions. What hasn’t been said is that they are also much more likely to be hackers and to join Anonymous – the antisocial “club” for hopeless human beings and social misfits. Autistics and ADHDers love computers because a) they involve no direct social contact and b) they offer constant distraction 24/7.

Spies

Julian Assange condemns internet corporations and the NSA for spying on unwitting internet users. Yet what are hackers if not spies? Who gave them permission to break into your system and look at your data? Who appointed Anonymous to spy? Who elected them? By what right do they hack the world’s data? What makes them any different from fascist totalitarians, from evil corporations and from disreputable governments ... treating the people with absolute contempt? Here’s a message for Anonymous. The people will not forget. The people will not forgive. The people are legion. And when the people are in charge, all the hackers of Anonymous – all those who believe they have the right to hack the people’s data – will be jailed as the criminals, spies and saboteurs they are.

Christianity: The League of Brainwashers HKA: “I’m a Christian and teaching my daughter about my faith is NOT abuse. I’m not forcing my religion on her. I’m educating her on my faith so she can make the best choice for her life. I pray that she chooses a walk with Christ. I love my child unconditionally and I love My God. Enough said!” Thus speaks a classic brainwasher! This person simply cannot understand her own behaviour and what she’s doing to her child. She doesn’t teach her child about Islam, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, atheism, agnosticism, Gnosticism, ontological mathematics ... so where does her claim come from that she’s not forcing her religious beliefs on her child? That appears to be all she is doing. She is even “praying” that her child makes the “right choice”. Of course, the whole point is that people such as HKA have no rational grounds for claiming they are correct. Their sham claims are derived from faith indoctrinated into them as children, just as HKA is now doing to her own child, and her child will do in due course as the brainwashing machine continues on its unmerry way. The abusers never see themselves as abusers. That’s the crux of the problem. People of faith can’t see that their faith is the worst abuse of all. To instil terror in a child of an invisible monster presiding over a place of infinite and eternal torture and pain is the very worst thing you can do to a

person. It’s a life sentence from which there is no parole – except if the person becomes rational and sees right through the great lie of faith. Every Muslim or Jew has faith equal to or stronger than HKA’s ... so faith is plainly useless for deciding what religion, and what God, is true. HKA is too dumb to grasp this and that’s why she, and countless others like her, are abusers, destroying their children’s minds with absurd nonsense and superstition. God help her children!

Mythos and Logos All the “holy” books of the human race are pure Mythos. They are stories with no literal and objective truth content whatsoever. They may contain psychological and metaphorical truths, but not a single useful fact that could land men on the moon. It’s extraordinary that human beings define their lives according to absurd, ancient stories. It’s no exaggeration that you could find as much worthwhile material in the world’s myths and legends, Aesop’s fables, the plays of Shakespeare, folk and fairytales, in the novels of Dostoyevsky or in Lord of the Rings as you could in all of the most sacred texts of humanity. And, in fact, the fictional works of Franz Kafka and Jorge Luis Borges easily transcend the holiest texts of humanity and provide enormously more profound truths. Only in Logos books – those of mathematics, science and philosophy – can you find actual truth. It’s time all the churches, mosques, temples and synagogues of the world had mathematics texts on the altars, and not a trace of any Mythos texts.

Eating is Cheating? Vegans are unusual insofar as they decide what to eat depending on ideology rather than taste. Would they refuse to have sex with beautiful meat-eating partners on ideological grounds? Where does this ideology end? Shouldn’t Vegans ideologically refuse to live amongst meat-eaters? Shouldn’t they go to war against them? Well, in fact, some of them do indeed become animal rights terrorists. Jews and Muslims refuse to eat pork for ideological (religious) reasons. They would go to war over pork, and indeed Muslims did in the Indian Mutiny of 1857 against the British.

The Mafia State The Mafia in Italy is sometimes said to operate a “shadow State”. For whose benefit is this secondary State run? Well, for the Mafia’s, of course. However, a disturbing question then arises. For whose benefit is the “proper” State run? And the answer is of course the ruling elite. In other words, they are simply a different kind of Mafia, the “legal” Mafia, but engaged in exactly the same racket. “Why rob a bank when you can found one?” – Bertold Brecht

The Libertarian Conspiracy Most conspiracy theories are devised and originated by rich, elite libertarians, and most conspiracy theorists are then manipulated by these elite libertarians to spread the absurd theory. All conspiracy theories claim that some sinister form of government is in charge and attacking the people. The 9/11 conspiracy theory actually says that governments are murdering their own people. And if 9/11 is possible then why shouldn’t FEMA death camps be possible? What do libertarians seek? – the complete end of government and its replacement by market forces. Who controls market forces? – well, the rich libertarian elite, of course. So, they spread anti-government conspiracy theories in order to advance their own conspiracy: to replace government and have the world permanently ruled by a rich global elite who are never elected by the people or accountable to the people. The 9/11 conspiracy theorists refuse to accept the self-evident fact that fanatical Muslim terrorists were responsible for the atrocity. Why? Because that’s no good to their campaign to get rid of the government and spread their libertarian doctrines. The 9/11 conspiracy theorists believe that their government perpetrated 9/11 simply because such a belief suits their own anarchist, libertarian conspiracy to overthrow the government. So, who are the real conspirators?

The Real Conspiracy The Washington D.C. elite are the political wing of Wall Street, the political facilitators for the ultra capitalists, fully bought and paid for. Crony

capitalism is the default mode of capitalism. How better to serve the capitalist agenda than to have poodle politicians working for you? The anarcho-capitalist libertarians are so dumb that they imagine that the Washington D.C. elite are against capitalism. Thus a wholly unradical politician such as Barack Obama – a cautious conservative – is denounced as a radical communist! This is the tired old Randian rhetoric, of course. Can any sane person believe that George W. Bush and Dick Cheney were anything other than capitalist cheerleaders – yet they are portrayed by the “Truth” Movement as homicidal socialists who, bafflingly, wanted to wage war to seize oil and to make a fortune from government contacts to rebuild the countries they had destroyed via their grand alliance with the military-industrial complex – which sounds like a shameless capitalist conspiracy if there ever was one, and nothing to do with socialism! Ayn Rand’s anarcho-capitalist libertarians can’t plausibly use Rand’s narrative of a Washington D.C. socialist elite trying to destroy American capitalism (although they try their hardest to do so!), so they have mutated the narrative into conflict between a perverted form of capitalism (so-called “crony” capitalism that operates via an unholy alliance of a Washington D.C. and a Wall Street elite) and “pure” capitalism (unregulated, freemarket capitalism). Anarcho-capitalist libertarians are fundamentalist capitalists (and often fundamentalist Christians into the bargain). They see anything less than ultra capitalism as “socialist”. Crony capitalism is condemned because it involves “socialist” bail-outs of capitalism, hence is impure and heretical. Crony capitalists are damned as capitalist apostates who have turned their back on the true faith, or outright infidels who don’t believe in the sacred free market. Ayn Rand’s legions are “holy warriors” of capitalism, mounting a capitalist jihad against all those who don’t worship Mammon properly. Of course, to anyone who is not a capitalist fanatic, it’s impossible to distinguish between crony capitalists and free-market capitalists. They all seem like ultra capitalists who would do anything to make a buck – including socialising their losses via government bailouts if that was what was required to protect their profits and wealth. Here’s the basic question of capitalism. Is there a single capitalist on Earth who would have preferred to be financially wiped out in the 2008

crash when his company became insolvent rather than be bailed out by the government and allowed to keep all of his wealth? Duh! Capitalists are the last people in the world who would have any compunction about taking money from anywhere to preserve their profits. The idea that capitalist fundamentalists would willingly make themselves bankrupt rather than accept a government bailout is comically ridiculous. Ayn Rand’s fictional John Galt would, in reality, have been the first in line in 2008 to accept taxpayers’ money – like a classic moocher, looter and parasite! Capitalism run by elites is the real problem of our world – not allegedly homicidal socialist governments intent on murdering their own citizens to allow them to depopulate the world by five billion souls, and enslave the survivors!

The Freest Society What is the freest society? It’s the one with the most equal opportunities. A society of privilege is automatically unfree since the privileged have freedoms denied to the unprivileged. Any two-tier or multi-tier society is unfree.

Cognitive Dissonance “In psychology, cognitive dissonance is the discomfort experienced when simultaneously holding two or more conflicting cognitions: ideas, beliefs, values or emotional reactions. In a state of dissonance, people may sometimes feel ‘disequilibrium’: frustration, hunger, dread, guilt, anger, embarrassment, anxiety, etc. ... The theory of cognitive dissonance in social psychology proposes that people have a motivational drive to reduce dissonance by altering existing cognitions, adding new ones to create a consistent belief system, or alternatively by reducing the importance of any one of the dissonant elements. Cognitive dissonance is the distressing mental state that people feel when they ‘find themselves doing things that don’t fit with what they know, or having opinions that do not fit with other opinions they hold.’ ... an assumption is that a person will avoid situations or information sources that give rise to feelings of uneasiness, or dissonance. ... According to Festinger, people engage in a process he termed ‘dissonance reduction,’ which can be achieved in one of three ways:

lowering the importance of one of the discordant factors, adding consonant elements, or changing one of the dissonant factors.” Theories such as cognitive dissonance typically fail to distinguish between different personality types. For example, is cognitive dissonance for a rational, thinking person the same as cognitive dissonance for an irrational, feeling person? A rational person can reduce dissonance by studying facts, evidence and rational arguments. One might say that the scientific method is simply a systematic means of allowing the scientific community to reduce cognitive dissonance caused by hypotheses not matching experimental data. Scientists become more and more confident about what they believe as the mismatch between hypotheses and experiments relentlessly reduces. However, the pursuit of a theory of quantum gravity to produce a “final theory of everything” is now generating countless problems, and causing growing cognitive dissonance. This means that a scientific revolution is required ... and an accompanying paradigm shift. Such a shift is the ultimate cognitive dissonance relief mechanism. For feeling types, facts, evidence and rational arguments are of no use. Rational and irrational ideas look the same to a feelings person. A feelings person does not reject an idea for being illogical but for not “making me feel good”, which is a wholly subjective criterion. A rational person cannot have a crisis of faith since such a person didn’t believe in the first place. It’s easy for rational people to abandon the faith in which their parents raised them because they never in fact had any emotional attachment to it. Feeling types, however, are in real trouble if they have a crisis of faith. They have no rational means of escape – they can’t reason their way out of the problem – so they have to undergo some dramatic event. We might say that St Paul’s conversion on the Road to Damascus was the supreme example of emotional cognitive dissonance reaching its crisis point. He literally had to undergo an “epiphany”: to go temporarily blind, to suffer a mental breakdown. He came back as a “new” person, and thus his cognitive dissonance was resolved. Feeling types have to undergo an abrupt conversion, a metamorphosis, a profound inner emotional change. They need to be “born again”. Rational types simply have to adjust their rational schema to accommodate new rational insights and logical arguments. Feeling types have to change their

core emotional state – which involves a traumatic internal revolution. That’s why religious converts are often much more fanatical than their coreligionists who have always been part of that religion. Feeling types have had to remodel their whole emotional framework to relieve serious cognitive dissonance. So, they become extremely entrenched in their views. They are never going to abandon them, no matter what any rationalist says. That’s why religion is such a difficult nut to crack. For a believer to abandon his beliefs means that he must undergo a terrifying Damascene Conversion, and most people aren’t capable of that. So, they stick with whatever religious beliefs were brainwashed into them in childhood. Their identity is invested in these, and they’re not going to relinquish them. Thus, emotional and rational cognitive dissonance are enormously different things. Emotional cognitive dissonance is much more serious and difficult. Muslims, for example, can never afford to think rationally, or to listen to any criticism of the Koran, because this would generate unacceptable cognitive dissonance. To reduce cognitive dissonance, they kill all apostates, heretics, infidels and dissidents. They promote enormous groupthink and conformism. This raises another issue: individual cognitive dissonance versus collective dissonance. The latter is much more problematic. If a feeling individual needs to undergo a breakdown in order to change from one cognitive state to a radically different one (just as Saul of Tarsus, primary persecutor of Christians, became St. Paul, greatest proselytizer for Christianity – almost a completely different person with a completely new name!), can you imagine what it would take for Islam to collectively change? In fact, only crises, social break down, wars, natural disasters, epidemics, financial meltdowns and revolutions can allow “phase changes” – changes from one collective cognitive state to another. Why is it taking so long to get rid of the elite? Because of cognitive dissonance. People are still buying into the false consciousness created by the elite. They want to move to a new cognitive state, but it seems far too daunting and terrifying, so they’re sticking with what they have.

Propaganda “All the rest is propaganda” is a line that works on many levels – for Washington D.C., Wall Street, the Supreme Court, Abrahamism, and so on.

They’re all just propagandists.

The Biggest Propagandist MM: “The ‘State’ ... is the biggest brainwashing propagandist of all time!!” Well, in fact, religion is the greatest exercise in propaganda of all time, and the State has traditionally served this propaganda with gusto. Monarchies and oligarchies have always sought to claim religious sanction for their rule over everyone else. With the decline of religion, States have sought alternative justification and have become propagandists in their own right. The Soviet Union was heavily committed to communist propaganda, which was of course hostile to religion. Nazi Germany promoted the propaganda of the “Master Race”, Aryan supremacy, will-to-power and the cult of the Fuehrer (a substitute Messiah). In modern capitalist States, the media provide an astoundingly effective propaganda machine for serving the interests of the capitalist elite. Capitalism, it must be stressed, is about the promotion of the interests of private elites and therefore has nothing to do with the concept of the State serving the public good and General Will. Religion serves the religious masters (popes, priests, rabbis, imams, gurus, preachers and prophets). The State serves the political masters (who are usually malevolent but ought to be benevolent in any legitimate, properly constituted State, such as a Meritocracy). Capitalism serves the rich masters – the private elites. Religious, State and capitalist propaganda is directed at adults through the world of work (and also play, with respect to capitalism), and at children through the world of education. Parents – once they have been brainwashed by religion, the State or capitalism – then subject their children to exactly the same propaganda, ensuring that the system is perpetuated indefinitely. Propaganda is unavoidable. The real issue is to make it as rational, fair, healthy and productive as possible. The Meritocratic State, committed to equal opportunities for all, automatically has to generate fair and rational propaganda in order not to contradict its own raison d’être. It won’t promote self-serving priestly elites and their toxic sectarian beliefs, it won’t

promote self-serving political parties such as the Nazi Party or Communist Party, and it won’t promote self-serving rich elites and oligarchies. So, the question is not one of being wholly free of propaganda, but of finding the propaganda system that serves the General Will, public good and Commonwealth. Only the State can provide this rational propaganda system. People can bleat about the State all the like, but they betray their irrational prejudices against the State by refusing to countenance the concept of rational, benevolent States serving all citizens equally. States have traditionally been bad because they have run by some self-serving elite or another. This does not make the concept of the State “bad”. It simply means that bad people are usually in charge. If you get rid of these bad elites, you can have wondrous States that help to optimize each and every citizen. That’s exactly what Meritocracy is designed to accomplish. Given that there has never been a Meritocracy in human history, no one can say it will be bad before it has even been tried. What’s for sure that none of the alternatives have ever worked, and only fools and madmen keep repeating failed systems and expecting a different outcome.

Secrets RW: “Secret societies are a bunch of lie sharers. True Gods don’t hide themselves on some underground bunker plotting conspiracies.” Secret societies exist so that they can ensure that they never have to spend any time with people such as RW, an irrational narcissist fantasist who spends all of his time commenting on secret societies. Why don’t you go and do something else with your time? Of course, you don’t have anything better to do, being an idiotic blowhard. So, tell us RW, what do “True Gods” do? In Islam, Allah is regarded as the “greatest plotter”, and he does nothing but hide in an invisible bunker. Where has Jesus Christ been for the last two thousand years? Perhaps plotting his “Second Coming” in an invisible bunker? What was Jehovah doing during the Holocaust when his Chosen People were being exterminated? Well, not much. In his invisible bunker, no doubt. Where are all the Hindu avatars of the one True God? We haven’t seen a lot of them lately. Invisible bunker, again.

So, whether it be False Gods or True Gods, what we know for sure is that they don’t make themselves visible to clowns, idiots, the unenlightened, and the narcissistic. RW of course believes himself to be a True God since otherwise how could he possibly know what True Gods do or do not do? Well, dream on RW ... and go and spend your time elsewhere, why don’t you? It’s the greatest feature of secret societies that they can exclude the ignorant and deluded. The whole point of secret societies is that they are for the initiated only and not for the mob, the faithful, the herd and the sheeple. They’re not for RW. Thank God.

The Kernel One of the most pernicious movements is the one that claims that all religions have a kernel of truth and ultimately reflect the same “God”. This is 100% false since all religions make absolutely incompatible and contradictory claims. Most have nothing in common at all. Muslims like to say that they “accept” Jesus Christ. What they mean is that they respect him as one of God’s many prophets. That is not the same as accepting Jesus Christ in the way that Christians accept him – as God himself. The Islamic position is heresy and an abomination to Christians, and the Christian position is heresy and an abomination to Muslims. So, they believe in opposite Gods, not the same God! That’s a fact.

Misrepresentation? ST: “The author’s blatant inability to objectively represent the points of view (with obvious discontent) prevents the reader, especially of Abrahamic faith, to find any common ground with the piece. In fact the hostile parameters in which he presents his/her point of view diminishes any reason or logic. In whole, the author actually greatens the gap of the chance of monologue between the opposing sides with centuries old hate, nearly as bad as the church. The story is as sad as theirs. Zzzz.” We are not in the business of promoting any common ground with Abrahamists. That’s like asking the people of God to find common ground with the people of the Devil, or rationalists to accept irrationalism. It’s “Either/Or”, not “And”. ST is an Abrahamist and is upset when anyone attacks his ludicrous beliefs. He suffers from the delusion that he and his

fellow Abrahamists are rational while their opponents are irrational. He says that our view “diminishes any reason or logic”. On the contrary, he, as an Abrahamist, is the one who ideologically promotes faith and revelation over truth, logic and reason. As a Freudian slip, he refers to the word “monologue” when he plainly means dialogue. Of course, Abrahamism never engages in any kind of dialogue with other views. It burns heretics, infidels and apostates at the stake, or cuts their heads off, or hangs them. So much for logic and reason. We do hate Abrahamism. Why wouldn’t we? We seek no dialogue with the mad and evil. Why would we? The comments of Abrahamists are always tiresome, irrational and pointless. Zzzzzz.

Ignavi MM: “I know some Ignavi individuals. lol.” AA: “Me too. They’re usually called humans.” Yes, most humans are Ignavi. The point is to do your best not to be one of them. HyperHumans aren’t Ignavi. Übermenschen are not Ignavi. It’s your choice whether you want to be a “Last Man” and one of the Ignavi ... or something nobler and higher.

Cost Centres and Profit Centres In terms of your contribution to humanity, are you a “cost centre” (a drain on others) or a “profit centre” (you give back more than you take in)? Imagine a world without any cost centres.

The Lizard Invasion Why does David Icke ludicrously claim that alien lizards are running the world when it’s plain that extremely rich capitalists are in charge? Icke does not want to attack the root of the world’s problem – the existence of a small privileged elite that dominates everyone else. Originally, brutal tribal chiefs were the elite. Then priests and shamans became the elite. Then warlords, dictators, monarchs and emperors became the elite. Then businessmen, entrepreneurs, bankers, politicians, boards of directors and CEOs became the elite, and remain so today.

Why call the elite extraterrestrial reptilians? Why not just analyse them for exactly what they are – a narcissistic, psychopathic, greedy, selfish, immoral bunch of gangsters who will do anything to get to the top and bully and dominate others, and take disproportionate resources for themselves? They have used brute violence, religious manipulation and overwhelming financial wealth to get their own way and intimidate and suppress others. Since free-market capitalism is their primary tool today, that’s what antielitists should be challenging, not making up lunatic stories about an invasion of alien lizard-men. Is Icke actually an agent of the elite, deflecting attention away from the real problem – free-market capitalism? He spends hours rambling away in vast auditoriums in front of thousands of people about invisible, shape-shifting, pan-dimensional reptilians. How many people would go to listen to him if he were simply dissecting the inherent iniquities and inequities of free-market capitalism? You see, it’s always Mythos, not Logos, that grabs attention. Icke is a capitalist businessman and he knows what he sells. And doesn’t that make him one of the lizards feeding and preying on the rest of us?!

The Untruth Movement Plenty of American targets were attacked by Al-Qaeda before 9/11 – including embassies and battleships – and we also had the Black Hawk Down episode in Mogadishu. All of this reveals how much the Islamic world hated America and would have liked nothing more to successfully strike the Great Satan on its own soil, as it finally did on 9/11. But Islamic hatred of America is of no use to conspiracy theorists who want to blame the American government for everything since it’s the government and not Islam that’s their sworn enemy. The “Truth Movement” are in fact the Untruth Movement since they continually twist the facts to suit their anti-government narrative. Anything inconvenient to their case – such as the fact that countless Muslims despise America and are engaged in global jihad against it – is simply ignored because they don’t fit the desired narrative.

Football, the New Religion For many people, football has replaced religion. The day of the big match is the “Sabbath”, the stadium is the Cathedral, sports commentators are prophets, the manager (coach) is the high priest who communicates with the

Gods, and the Gods are the players themselves, who perform “miracles” and are worshipped as Messiahs. People fight for “holy relics” – autographs, signed strips, match balls, parts of goalposts, turfs of the pitch. Players sent off by the referee are “martyrs”. Top goal scorers are saints, miracle workers and divinities. They are “priceless”.

The Insurance “Complex” In Britain, Obamacare is seen as a long-overdue attempt to make American healthcare more like Britain’s National Health Service. In Britain, healthcare isn’t run by vast health insurance corporations but by the State. In America, the British system is often viewed as naked socialism. In Britain, the American system is viewed as “health for the rich” (who can pay for their health insurance) and “death for the poor” (who can’t). To the British, the American system is wholly unacceptable unless you are well off. Britain prides itself on being able to treat everyone free at the point of use (or need). The present right wing government of Britain is currently attempting to make the British system more like the traditional American system, and this is causing widespread discontent. The British NHS is a positive liberty, public, State system and the American health insurance system is a negative liberty, private, capitalist market system. There’s no question that Britain is right and America wrong.

The “Complex” “In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the militaryindustrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.” – Eisenhower Eisenhower should have added Wall Street, banking, corporations, health insurance and lobbying to his list of “misplaced power”. The political process has been wholly undermined and hijacked by these pernicious influences.

The Second Coming

Jesus 2.0 – new and upgraded, with extra functionality. Let’s hope the second Jesus does a lot better than the first. Anyway, why didn’t he sort things out first time around? The central doctrine of “Total Quality Management” (TQM) is “Get it right first time, every time.” Jesus failed! No much of a manager, is he?

The Earthquake Imagine the planet Earth as a metaphor for humanity. The elite control the Earth’s crust, keeping everything else “held in”, controlled, restrained, repressed, dominated. Only the elite breathe fresh air, see the great, wide sky and feel the delightful warmth of the sun on their faces. The masses are beneath the crust, in a pressure cooker that gets worse and worse with depth. The underclass are the Earth’s molten core, in absolute hell, and totally crushed by everything above them. Yet the Earth’s crust isn’t safe. Although it’s stable most of the time, huge movements, tumults and upheavals underneath can lead to catastrophic volcanic eruptions, earthquakes and tsunamis that devastate the surface. In human terms, these are the uprisings such as the French and Russian Revolutions that lead to the slaughter of many of the rich. It’s the material closest to the surface that erupts through the surface and changes it forever. So, in human terms, who are the people below the elite’s top layer? They are the smart meritocrats who haven’t succeeded because they have been penalised by living in a system of privilege. Their talent didn’t help them because they didn’t know the right people and move in the right circles. For meritocrats to succeed they must smash privilege to smithereens. That means they must destroy the rich and destroy every mechanism that the rich have ruthlessly exploited to turn themselves into dynastic elites based on inheritance and privilege. Meritocrats are the earthquakes, the hurricanes, the volcanoes and tsunamis. We are the forces of nature, and it’s our responsibility to change the surface of the Earth and give everyone an equal opportunity to live there and prosper. The rich must be destroyed. There is no other way. Their dynastic power must be eliminated by 100% inheritance tax.

The elite have never understood that they are standing on the precipice, that the ground can move under their feet, that the land can shatter or explode. They do not exist in isolation. They are part of a planetary system. They are not immune. They can be blown away. In fact, they will be, just as the arrogant King, Queen and aristocrats of France were. The rich never learn. The French aristocrats paid little or no tax, while the peasants who lived and worked on their land were penally taxed. We see exactly the same situation in America today where the super rich avoid and evade paying tax, while the ordinary people are fully taxed with no escape. The outcome will be exactly the same. The super rich will be overthrown and lose everything.

The Evil God “I felt sure that by ‘Will’ [Schopenhauer] really meant God, the Creator, and that he was saying that God was blind. Since I knew from experience that God was not offended by any blasphemy, that on the contrary He could even encourage it because He wished to evoke not only man’s bright and positive side but also his darkness and ungodliness, Schopenhauer’s view did not distress me.” – Jung It’s certainly valuable to think of the Abrahamic God as pure, blind Will to Power, utterly brutal and savage. He’s like a cosmic Mr Hyde, waiting to evolve a civilized Dr Jekyll aspect. No civilized person could view the Torah, Old Testament and Koran with anything other than revulsion. These books are all about power and control, and only savages, submissive masochists and psychopaths find them appealing.

Keeping Secrets Only introverts can be relied upon to keep secrets. For extraverts, secrets and gossip are currency. They allow an extravert to strut the stage and be the centre of attention, exactly as he desires. Why would an extravert ever keep anything secret, or any gossip unrevealed? It’s contrary to an extravert’s nature. Extraverts often hate secret societies – that’s often because they’re not allowed to join since they’re not deemed reliable and trustworthy, with the ability to keep their mouth shut. Extraverts usually have their mouths wide open!

It’s often said, “The quiet ones are the worst.” This is true. Whereas extraverts are often open books because their lives are lived in front of an audience (extraverts always seek company), introverts spend a lot of time on their own and could be getting up to almost anything. Moreover, since they’re extremely good at keeping secrets and avoiding a social audience, others will never find out what they’re getting up to.

Our Advice When you are posting anything anywhere online, you should bear in mind this advice: If you have something meaningful to say then say it meaningfully. Use proper grammar, use a spellchecker, reflect on what you’re about to say, polish it until it shines and then post it. Make it a thing of quality. Don’t contaminate high quality pages and websites with junk, drivel, rubbish, deranged rantings, moronic observations, and whatever half-baked idea flitted into your mind a second ago. Think before you post. Be a high quality person for a change. Posterity will judge your efforts! If you can’t say anything worthwhile, don’t say anything at all. Speak when you have something worth saying, or don’t speak. Sadly, this advice is almost never heeded.

The Best If you’re not giving your best, what are you giving? Who are the people who succeed? Those who always give their best.

Worshopping These days, most people worship Mammon, the god of consumerism and wealth. Sorry, they don’t worship him, they worshop him. Everything is about shopping, consuming, buying. How do you make the rich richer, if you don’t worshop them, if you don’t buy their goods? You have failed in your sacred capitalist duty to enrich the rich.

Laughter Comedy, like a show by an illusionist, is about misdirection. An illusionist misdirects in order to amaze with a trick. The comedian misdirects in order

to get a laugh. A joke is constructed so as to make the audience anticipate the punchline, and then the actual punchline is something completely different. We laugh to disguise our horror that we have been successfully deceived. Comedy is a kind of socially acceptable lying. So is fiction, and so are magic shows. So, in fact, is religion.

Rhetoric Although the ancient Greeks and Romans were impressed with rhetoric and considered it a great art, it was also, from its inception, considered dangerous since it could be used to persuade people to do the bad rather than the good. It was said that the first person to establish the rules of rhetoric had a pupil who learned his master’s tricks so well that he persuaded his master that he didn’t need to be paid! The Sophists were the disreputable pseudo-intellectuals who, as expert rhetoricians available for hire, were able to use their skills to promote the cause of their clients. Today, we would call them lawyers, marketing men, brand manager, advertisers and spin doctors. What is rhetoric these days? It’s spin. Rhetoric is almost wholly insincere and manipulative. Conspiracy theorists use a vast amount of rhetoric. Politics is nothing but empty rhetoric and spin, politicians mere dummies of their ventriloquist spin doctors, speechwriters and political advisers standing in the corner. Rhetoric goes hand in hand with Mythos. It’s always an emotive story, a framed narrative, an easy-to-understand, dumbed-down argument for the masses. Rhetoric has never been linked to mathematics, science or complex philosophy. No prophet, preacher, politician, marketing man, brand manager, spin doctor, conspiracy theorist or rabble rouser has ever used mathematics, science or profound metaphysics in their speeches and orations. The truth is anti-rhetorical. Rhetoric is one of the dark arts – always used for lying and exploitation, for playing on people’s emotions. Moses, Jesus Christ and Mohammed are classic liars. Nothing of substance ever passed their lips. All they did was deceive, manipulate and spin. These people were the supreme false prophets, the most effective spin doctors the world has ever encountered, the greatest con men there have ever been. “Great” religions – with hundreds of millions of followers – are always great

deceptions, grand lies, vast manipulations of people’s deepest hopes and fears. All Mythos religions are dangerous and Satanic. The more Logos content a religion has, and the less it appeals to emotion, the truer it is. Illuminism – ontological mathematics – is the ultimate truth. It’s a wholly Logos religion and has no need at all for faith or feelings.

The Modern Illusion People are fantastically busy in the modern age, but are they doing anything productive, or just finding endless ways to distract themselves? Isn’t the modern world nothing but a vast, ingenious, technological time-wasting machine, with iPhones and the internet leading the way in terms of people frittering their lives away on absolute nonsense? More and more, the central task facing all people who want to achieve things, is to avoid the timewasting activities with which the world is saturated.

No Books Before the invention of the printing press, all books were laboriously handwritten, and there were extremely few of them. Therefore, most people couldn’t read ... because there was nothing to read. Only the elite had access to books. Who reads books today? Scarcely anyone. It’s as if they have been uninvented. Only the intellectual elite read now.

The Invisible Economy Sales assistants stand around in shops, ready to sell “things” to consumers. Imagine an economy based on people who sold ideas. Imagine an economy without a “thing” in sight, but only ideas. The better and more valuable the idea, the higher the price it commanded. We’d soon have a world of geniuses.

Anonymous “[Anonymous] is a bee-hive where the queen is missing – yet buzzing with activity in every possible form, direction, shape and colour one could possibly imagine.” – Anonymous

Yet a bee hive is all about the Queen Bee, and there would be no hive without her. The whole hive operates to support the General Will, encapsulated in the Queen Bee. In a libertarian anarchy without any leaders or rules – which is what Anonymous actually stands for – there is no General Will and no hive cooperation, just lots of atomised individuals doing their own thing. “This does not mean, however, that there can’t be ‘bad’ actions presented as coming from Anonymous.” – Anonymous So, where is the list of “bad” actions done in the name of Anonymous and then condemned by Anonymous? Well, no such list exists, so Anonymous in fact acknowledges no “bad” actions! It has no mechanisms, rules or procedures for condemning anything at all, so it supports everything, no matter how vile. “Anonymous believes the only legitimate form of power is that power which rests on widespread public consent, and so there is not one person or group of people who can ever claim to be Anonymous.” – Anonymous How is consent to be gauged? Anonymous can’t even work out whether it consents to the actions carried out in its own name! “Anonymous is not a political current, nor is it based on a political current. Some may say that it’s anarchism, liberalism, communism, libertarianism, etc. – others say it’s nothing but a bunch of twelve-year olds from 4chan having fun on the internet. Anonymous is none of those – yet it encompasses elements of all these things and many, many more. ... Anonymous is anything and everything, anyone and everyone, anywhere and everywhere.” – Anonymous So, Anonymous literally proclaims itself to be all things to all men! You’re in real trouble if you don’t know whether you’re a liberal, communist, anarchist , conservative, fascist or libertarian, and you’re insane if you think an organisation can be all of these things and represent anything coherent at all. “FREE-THINKERS, HYPERBOREANS, FUTURE.” – Anonymous

BUILDERS

OF

THE

Guess who’s been stealing from the Illuminati! We are the Hyperboreans because we are the rationalist followers of Apollo. There’s nothing rational about Anonymous. It doesn’t proclaim any rational message at all, just an immensely confused message about the “people” doing whatever they like, exactly as in an anarchy. Anonymous has nothing to do with Hyperborea. Rather, it inhabits Cloud Cuckoo Land. “Cloud Cuckoo Land refers to an unrealistically idealistic state where everything is perfect. ... It hints that the person referred to is naïve, unaware of reality or deranged in holding such an optimistic belief.” – Wikipedia “Now first and foremost, it is important to realize that Anonymous – in fact – does not exist. It is just an idea – an internet meme – that can be appropriated by anyone, anytime to rally for a common cause that’s in the benefit of humankind.” So, if Anonymous does not exist, how come it carries out hacking attacks, criminal sabotage and posts idiotic videos? It certainly has more tangible effects on the world than another absurd non-existent – the Christian God. If people act in the name of Anonymous then Anonymous exists just as AlQaeda exists if people bomb in its name. Anonymous cannot wash its hands of what is done in its name by ludicrously claiming that it does not exist. When a drone hovers over Al-Qaeda terrorists, ready to blast them to kingdom come, the terrorists won’t be saying, “But Al-Qaeda doesn’t exist ... it’s just like Anonymous!” Anyway, who judges what is in the “benefit of humankind?” Autistic computer hackers? God help us.

Impostor Syndrome II “The impostor syndrome, sometimes called impostor phenomenon or fraud syndrome, is a psychological phenomenon in which people are unable to internalize their accomplishments. Despite external evidence of their competence, those with the syndrome remain convinced that they are frauds and do not deserve the success they have achieved. Proof of success is dismissed as luck, timing, or as a result of deceiving others into thinking they are more intelligent and competent than they believe themselves to be. ... In Satoshi Kanazawa’s article, The Impostor Syndrome, he writes about a book by Susan Pinker. Pinker explains that she interviewed a couple of

highly accomplished women in which they claim, ‘Despite accolades, rank, and salary the women felt like phonies.’ These women did not believe in their own accomplishments, and they felt like they were scamming everyone with the skills they said they had. These women frequently asked why people believe this about them. “The impostor syndrome was formerly thought to occur primarily in women. According to Pinker 1978, ‘it is purely limited to successful women; successful men apparently never feel like they are frauds. Success is more likely to be attributed to internal factors for men, compared to external factors for women. Failure for men is attributed to external factors, whereas for women it is internal factors’.” – Wikipedia

Entitlement Syndrome The opposite of Impostor Syndrome is Entitlement Syndrome (and occurs primarily in men). Where the former is about talented people thinking they are frauds, not entitled to their rewards and acclaim, the latter are untalented frauds who think they are entitled to their excessive rewards and acclaim. Of course, our world is run by psychopaths, frauds, fakes and phoneys suffering from entitlement syndrome.

The Revolution “Sane” capitalism promoted a prosperous middle class to act as a buffer between the workers and the super rich. However, Marx always maintained that the logic of capitalism was sure to ultimately create just two classes: the bourgeoisie (the capitalists) and the proletariat (the workers). In the present day, we see the return to the fundamental logic of capitalism. The elite are grabbing more and more for themselves, pushing the middle class down into the proles. As soon as that process reaches its tipping point, Revolution will begin. All great revolutions weren’t started and led by proles but by the middle class intelligentsia. When they no longer buy the false consciousness sold by the elite, the elite are finished.

***** The internet is exaggerating the difference between rich and poor like nothing else. The internet entrepreneurs are multi-billionaires, while the

people who make the goods and pack the parcels for distribution (everyone else) are monkeys being paid peanuts.

Selection Many people would be horrified if schools were established strictly on the basis of IQ. i.e. if all the children with the highest IQs were sent to the best schools, and schools for everyone else were deprived all of the excellent resources enjoyed by the top schools. Everyone would suspect that this would lead to a vast IQ disparity, and that a sinister intellectual elite would be born. Yet these same critics are completely silent when the selection criterion is parental wealth rather than IQ and all the children of the privileged elite go to the best schools with the best resources. If that doesn’t give birth to a sinister elite based on privilege and nepotism, it would be a miracle. And there is no miracle. All of your choices and chances in life are inexorably tied to the wealth of your parents. This world is no kind of meritocracy.

The Middle Ground Psychological studies have shown that people are more likely to buy products in the middle of supermarket shelves rather than those to the left or right. In fact, people have a relentless bias for the middle in almost every aspect of life. This is why people suffer from groupthink, conformism, other- and tradition-directedness, consensus, democracy, mediocrity, banality, blandness, conservatism, the preservation of the status quo. People are overwhelmingly likely to do what everyone else is doing. They are more likely to vote for centrist political parties than radical parties. They are averse to risk and anything too unusual. Extremes always have a struggle, which is why society is so slow to change. The truth – something that first appears in the mind of just one person – never has an easy time. It’s always up against the “accepted” truths (which are usually never true at all). Radical positions always require a “tipping point” to be reached. Once a certain number of people agree with a radical position, it is thereby “normalised” and made socially acceptable. The conformists can then start getting on board with it.

The Wages of Sin Priests invented an imaginary disease – sin – in order to make people desperate for the cure. Who held the monopoly over the cure? Well, the priests, of course. How do you control people? You create a reason why they must come to you and do what you want. Drug users are totally controlled by drug dealers. They must have the product the dealers are selling. Employees must go to their employers for a job and wage, hence are controlled by their employers. Ordinary people who want a house must get a mortgage, hence are controlled by the banks that supply it. People wanting something right now must have a credit card, which is controlled by banks. What is a free world? It’s where all of these mechanisms of control have been exposed and obliterated. If someone is controlling you, you are a slave. Freedom means getting rid of the controllers.

A Way of Life Jews often say that Judaism is a way of life as much as a religion. It’s a strange way of life to describe oneself as one of the Chosen People and to be a cheerleader for a God who orders fathers to slaughter their children, and who exterminated the whole of humanity bar Noah and his family.

Political Correctness Political correctness = the attempt to shut down the discussion of difficult and controversial topics. Political correctness is doubly intolerant. It doesn’t tolerate those who are not politically correct (i.e. those who disagree with the self-appointed arbiters of what constitutes acceptable standards), and, by tolerating utterly abominable doctrines such as those of Islam, Judaism and Christianity, it makes itself an ally of the most obnoxious belief systems there have ever been. Political correctness, as the great friend of intolerance, must be eradicated by all tolerant people. It is always politically wrong not to denounce evil religions, beliefs and cultural practices. Ultimately, people have no right to be wrong!

Israel Historically, Israel was surrounded by superpowers: Egypt, Assyria, Babylonia, Persia, Macedon-Greece, Rome. Why did such a puny, pathetic little nation imagine itself to have any significance? Israel is the supreme example of “short man” syndrome. The short guy is overly-aggressive, domineering, narcissistic and egomaniacal, laying claim to a special status – all to disguise the truth that he’s an insignificant nobody. It’s hardly surprising that so many psychologists were and are Jews. From the outset, they were a people suffering from every psychological problem imaginable. The history of the Jews is the history of psychosis. No race has ever been madder than the Jews, hence the sheer scale of the madness of their claims.

Greek or Jew? The Jews were given the opportunity to become part of the Greek world, to embrace Greek philosophy and culture, to become civilised. They refused. You cannot be both Greek and Jew. The Muslims are Arab Jews. The Catholics tried to be both Greek and Jew, but this proved impossible. Protestant Christianity constitutes the rejection of the Greek part of Catholicism and the choice to be Jewish. Jews are monotheists and people of laws, commandments, rituals, customs and rules. Greeks are pagans and people of reason, culture, philosophy, music, mathematics, theatre, and science. Humanity’s greatest tragedy was that it failed to follow Greek culture and, instead, half of the world became infected by Judaism, via the two Jewish miscarriages of Christianity and Islam. The Romans regarded Judaism as mere superstition rather than a religion, and that’s right. However, it was something more than that: it was the world’s first brainwashing system. Jews often talk with pride of how their religion has survived through endless persecution. Well, it wouldn’t survive if its brainwashing techniques were outlawed, as they ought to be. Judaism is a mental virus, an infection of the mind, a repellent superstition that makes the afflicted believe they are “Chosen”. Judaism is the ultimate source of all religious extremism and madness.

Mind Manipulation “The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. ...We are governed, our minds are moulded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. ...In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons... who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.” – Edward L. Bernays, Propaganda

Social Worth Bankers have a very high financial worth, but what’s their social worth, their value to society? Nurses have low financial worth but high social worth. Many people who have extremely high financial worth have extremely low social worth, and vice versa. Isn’t it the case that we live in an upside down world? We have all of our values wrong. Our world places a higher value on anti-social worth. The people who are most hostile to the development of society and community are those who receive the highest rewards.

Digital Detox Digital detox: “A period of time during which a person refrains from using electronic devices such as smartphones or computers, regarded as an opportunity to reduce stress or focus on social interaction in the physical world.” – Oxford Dictionary Studies show that when you distract yourself from some activity to check the internet for messages, tweets, Facebook updates, and so on, it takes you around 25 minutes to regain the focus you had before you went on online. A

few “distraction” sessions would destroy your focus and ensure you accomplished nothing. Smartphone? That’s an oxymoron. They’re actually Dumbphones. The more you use them, the dumber you get. You stop thinking. You stop reflecting. You lose focus. You can’t get things done. Smartphones are a way of making everyone suffer from ADHD (Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder). Cui bono? Those who want to keep you dumb, occupied, mired in trivia, constantly exposed to their messages, their propaganda and their advertisements. The Smartphone is how the corporatocracy invade your life all day every day. It’s all part of the “bread and circuses” strategy of the elite to pacify the masses. People say they are addicted to technology. In fact, they’re addicted to what the gadgets provide – social networking and interaction. The physical world does not provide people with what they are seeking, so they go to the fantastical online world instead. People would stop being addicted to gadgets if they were being provided with a sufficiently stimulating physical environment. The corporatocracy has made our physical lives staggeringly dull, with endless dull shopping malls, dull jobs, dull commuting, dull consumerism, junk TV, Hollywood junk, muzak, low-quality relationships, no spirituality. We are always being dumbed down, being smothered by the lowest common denominator, being forced to participate in the soul-destroying race to the bottom. Political correctness is rife. Everyone is fake and phoney. Everyone’s a fraud, a persona, a mask. It’s a world of appearance, a world of the capitalist “spectacle.” And now the capitalist powers-that-be have taken over the online world too. There’s no escape. We are all being brainwashed all the time.

Corporatocracy “Corporatocracy, not to be confused with Corporatism, is a term used as an economic and political system controlled by corporations or corporate interests. It is a generally pejorative term often used by critics of the current economic situation in a particular country, especially the United States. The term has been used by liberal and left-leaning critics, but also some economic libertarian critics and other political observers across the political spectrum. Economist Jeffrey Sachs described the United States as a

corporatocracy in his book The Price of Civilization. He suggested that it arose from four trends: weak national parties and strong political representation of individual districts, the large U.S. military establishment after World War II, big corporate money financing election campaigns, and globalization tilting the balance away from workers. “The term was used by author John Perkins in his 2004 book Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, where he described corporatocracy as a collective composed of corporations, banks, and governments. This collective is known as what author C Wright Mills would call the Power Elite. The Power Elite are wealthy individuals who hold prominent positions in Corporatocracies. These individuals control the process of determining society’s economic and political policies. “The concept has been used in explanations of bank bailouts, excessive pay for CEOs, as well as complaints such as the exploitation of national treasuries, people, and natural resources. It has been used by critics of globalization, sometimes in conjunction with criticism of the World Bank or unfair lending practices, as well as criticism of free trade agreements.” – Wikipedia

The Contradiction Right wing people are typically socially conservative and economically liberal, although a minority are socially and economically liberal. How can people be both conservative and liberal? Isn’t that a contradiction? What is common to all right wingers is a hatred of the State (unless it’s a right wing State promoting right wing values). A liberal left wing State is despised by right wing conservatives, and a left wing State committed to redistribution of wealth and higher public spending and taxation is despised by right wing economic liberals. Definitions: A conservative is someone who holds to traditional attitudes and values and is cautious about change or innovation in politics or religion. A liberal is someone who is open to new behaviour, attitudes or opinions and willing to discard traditional religious and social values.

“Classical liberalism is a political philosophy and ideology belonging to liberalism in which primary emphasis is placed on securing the freedom of the individual by limiting the power of the government. The philosophy emerged as a response to the Industrial Revolution and urbanization in the 19th century in Europe and the United States. It advocates civil liberties with a limited government under the rule of law, and belief in laissez-faire economic policy. Classical liberalism is built on ideas that had already arisen by the end of the 18th century, such as selected ideas of Adam Smith, John Locke, Jean-Baptiste Say, Thomas Malthus, and David Ricardo. It drew on a psychological understanding of individual liberty, the contradictory theories of natural law and utilitarianism, and a belief in progress. Classical liberals were more suspicious than conservatives of all but the most minimal government and, adopting Thomas Hobbes’s theory of government, they believed government had been created by individuals to protect themselves from one another.” – Wikipedia

Neoclassical Liberalism “In the 20th century, Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman, as response to the social liberalism and Keynesianism, argued that government should be as small as possible in order to allow the exercise of individual freedom. This return to the ideas of classical liberalism was called ‘neo-classical liberalism’. Some use the term ‘classical liberalism’ to refer to all liberalism before the 20th century, not to designate any particular set of political views, and therefore see all modern developments as being, by definition, not classical. “In the United States primarily, ‘libertarianism’ has been used as a substitute for the term ‘neo-classical liberalism’, however, right-libertarians and some conservatives use the term to describe their own beliefs, as well.” – Wikipedia “Neoclassical liberalism, usually referred to as ‘neoliberalism’, is liberalism based on principles of neoclassical economics, namely free competition, a self-regulating market economy, and low or no taxes on income and property, while sharing with other forms of liberalism ‘a belief in progress, the essential goodness of the human race, and the autonomy of the individual and standing for the protection of political and civil liberties’ (Merriam-Webster.com). In these senses it is economically in the sense of

income and private property issues on the right while being socially in the sense of personal issues on the left. In terms of class interest (the original reference points of left versus right) it is decidedly on the right in modern society, that is conservative. As such it is sometimes referred to as ‘liberal conservatism’ or ‘conservative liberalism’ by commentators.” – http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_neoclassical_liberalism Right wingers, whether socially conservative and economically neoliberal, or socially liberal and economically neoliberal, are united in their detestation of the positive liberty State that seeks to create a better society through improving the quality of its citizens. Such States are regarded as unGodly, as fascist or communist, as interfering with the natural order, as attacking the family and religion. What’s for sure is that we will never have a new world of merit and equal opportunities if we keep doing what the human race has always done. The history of the human race is a right wing history – to its extreme detriment. Right wing neoliberals are always on the side of elites and against the people. The right wing neoliberal creed revolves around: 1) The free market (to help the rich). 2) Small State (so as not to interfere with the interests of the rich). 3) Low taxation (to ensure the rich get richer). 4) Strong police and army (to protect the rich if the people rise up).

Choice and Apathy Democracy is where choice and apathy collide. People are given choices, but no one is keen on any of them. Capitalism relies on people being eager to make consumer choices. Capitalist democracy relies on people being apathetic about political choices. Imagine how the world would change if people actually cared about politics and demanded worthwhile choices?! People are disconnected from politics and that’s how it’s intended to be. The powers-that-be want to give you the illusion of choice while offering you no actual choice at all. The whole point of politics is to keep the rich rich, and to preserve the power of the establishment. The elite have no

interest in the masses having any power to subvert the power and wealth of the rulers. Isn’t that self-evident? Even if, by some miracle, a proper tribune of the people were elected, how would he be able to do anything about the unelected and unaccountable market and corporatocracy without starting a Revolution?

The Choice What’s it to be? Should the people have their hands round the throats of the rich, or should the rich have their hands round the throats of the people? History has taught that it must be one way or the other. “Would that the Roman people had but one neck!” – Caligula

How Christianity Became Powerful Early Christianity was like a hippie cult and women played a highly influential role in its development. An underground movement, it was hated by the establishment. The fact that women spread the Christian message via friends and family rather than a violent political mob meant that it was hard to crush. Christianity finally succeeded when Helena, mother of the Emperor Constantine, converted to Christianity and then persuaded her son to do the same. Once the imperial family was Christian, all the leading families of Rome, seeking to curry favour with the Emperor, did the same. They converted out of pure self-interest, not because they had any love of Christianity. Thus it always is. England converted from Catholicism to Protestantism because King Henry VIII rejected the Pope’s authority and established the Anglican Church, causing most of the leading families of England – consumed with ambition and lust for power and wealth – to do the same. Religions succeed as soon as they are endorsed by the powers-that-be, and not before. They succeed because of political and financial reasons, not because of any genuine religious sentiments. Hypocrisy and self-interest always define the advance of religion.

The United Nations What’s the point of the United Nations given that it is less powerful than America, where its headquarters is based, and by which it is mostly funded?

Who elected America the world policeman? And who guards the guards?

The Conversation A woman was overheard on the phone talking about the Virgin Mary, Jesus Christ, the Pope and the Bible. Such a woman understands the world via her Catholic religious beliefs, her Catholic Mythos. This same woman would have zero understanding of ontological mathematics, M-theory, quantum mechanics, relativity, Leibnizian metaphysics, and so on. So, what’s her optimal rational strategy? To sign up to a system (no matter how silly) that she understands and allows her to make sense of the world, or to accept a system (no matter how logical) that she doesn’t understand and with which she can make no sense of anything? People do what they have to do ... based on their intelligence and education. It would be irrational for an unintelligent Catholic to become an Illuminist because it would leave them dazed and confused, all of their old “certainties” gone. You can rationally subscribe only to what makes rational sense to you, and that depends on how smart you are.

Morality Abrahamic “morality” is based on good and evil. Illuminist “morality” is based on smart and stupid. Smart people are good and stupid people are evil. Which makes all Abrahamists and irrationalists evil! Imagine a world where all stupid people were told they were going to hell and that the only way to save themselves was to get smart. Wouldn’t that be an enormously better world than the one we’re living in? In this world, people are required to be stupid so that the religious, political and financial elites can dominate and enslave them.

Story Logic Most people in the world resort to story logic rather than rational logic. They prefer to understand life through a narrative rather than through equations, proofs, facts, evidence, formulae, dialectics and syllogisms. That’s why the Bible is a story book. Priests and pastors deliver sermons about the “meaning” of the Bible. They never deliver sermons about mathematics, physics or philosophy.

Why not? Because they can’t. They’re far too stupid. They’re Mythos thinkers, not Logos thinkers.

Religion = the Enemy of Positive Liberty The modern world revolves around the doctrine of negative liberty – minimal intervention by the State in the people’s lives. Since the State leaves people largely alone, the State is no way responsible for defining the meaning of life for its citizens. This void is filled by religion. Most people expect the State to keep out of their affairs and to be allowed to pursue their religious beliefs without any hindrance. The most significant positive liberty States have always attacked religion. The French Revolutionaries sought to abolish Catholicism, the Russian Revolutionaries Eastern Orthodox Christianity, and the Nazi Revolutionaries the Abrahamic religion. Positive liberty States seek to replace religion and to define a new vision for the human race and for human potential. So, what do you want? A State that leaves its citizens alone to believe in their various sectarian gods, or a State that, in effect, replaces God and defines the meaning of life and sets out to optimise every citizen so that paradise can be built on this earth here and now. We can transform Earth from a planetary penal colony, a cosmic lunatic asylum – from hell itself! – into heaven, where we are all Gods. Well, what will it be? The people who rail against positive liberty are those who have the most to lose in a positive liberty State – the rich, the religious and the anarchists and libertarians who loathe government and the State in principle. Such people can never be part of a positive liberty Meritocratic Republic.

Wrong is Right A wrong but productive idea can be far superior to a correct but unproductive idea. Hitherto, mathematics has been taught formally and “correctly”. It’s about time it was taught informally and mixed in with philosophy, science, psychology and religion – exactly as we have done in the God Series. No one could claim that we have dumbed anything down. On the contrary, the God Series may well be the most complex piece of work in human history ... and the launchpad for humanity’s divine future.

Tax

“Where you find the laws most numerous, there you will find also the greatest injustice.” – Arcesilaus Where you find the largest set of tax laws, there you will find the maximum degree of tax evasion, tax avoidance, and financial injustice against the ordinary taxpayers.

War Modern war is total war. There are no non-combatants. The “rear” is as much part of the war as the “front”. We are all in the war between the super rich and the people. There are no non-combatants. The question is – which side are you on?

“Moral” America America has expressed outrage at the alleged use of chemical weapons by the Syrian government. So, what about the American use in the last few decades of Agent Orange, of napalm, of depleted uranium and white phosphorus bombs? When did America confess to the world that it was completely wrong in the Vietnam War and that it ought to have put its Presidents Johnson and Nixon on trial for the same crimes that are now being attributed to the Syrian leadership? Would America have welcomed being bombed by foreign powers as punishment? Or is it the case that only America is allowed to punish, but no one is allowed to punish America? What kind of “morality” is that? It’s just might is right. In which case, any powerful nation can do whatever it likes, and no one is allowed to “talk back”. When were American drone strikes agreed to be legal by the world? Why are American drones allowed to invade foreign air space without this being regarded as an act of war? How would Americans like it if they had a thousand killer drones permanently hovering over their airspace, ready to assassinate any Americans (including “collateral damage”) that America’s enemies didn’t like? America would go to war immediately. It’s absurd that America is allowed to define what is moral and legal – whenever it suits America and its pro-Zionist foreign agenda. America readily does to others what it would never tolerate having done to it. Then it’s astonished when events such as 9/11 take place. America

would be under attack all of the time if America’s enemies had the same military power as America. Only one lesson can be learned. A superpower such as America can do what it wants with impunity ... so everyone else ought to get as many nukes as possible and build up their military power to the maximum. What’s true in the military sphere is also true of the economic sphere where the American super rich can do (and have done) whatever they like with impunity. It was the American super rich who caused the financial meltdown of 2008. Their greed remains a catastrophic threat to the global economy, but of course no one is doing anything at all to curb them.

The Anarchy Delusion “Anarchy simply means having no rulers, and no authority. It doesn’t mean that anarchists have no rules in their lives.” – An anarchist So, if there are no rulers, no government and no authority, who sets the rules and who enforces the rules? Rules that are not enforced are no rules at all. Anarchy is the illusion that there can be rules without rulers. The jungle is where the logic of anarchy is revealed. No rules ... a free for all ... might is right ... the strong eat the weak. Literally. Anarchy always ends in pure violence. The fundamental logic of anarchy is violence. Anarchy is entirely rooted in violence and based on violence. Anarchy is a violent hatred of authority – of anyone daring to tell you what is good and right, of what is in the interest of the General Will rather your own private will. Anarchy and libertarianism go hand in hand. They are about insane individualism, the refusal to accept group rules established by group rulers acting rationally in the name of the General Will. Anarchy and libertarianism are erroneous, deluded and irrationalist ideologies for simplistic, infantile narcissists and egomaniacs.

***** “Make no mistake, I don’t train up followers, I train up Leadership.” – An anarchist WTF! Leaders in an anarchy? That’s a contradiction in terms. A leader is a person of authority who sets rules – exactly what is denounced and rejected

by anarchists. That’s exactly why anarchists are irrational. They’re living in a fantasy world for children.

Super Villains Given the way the world is, shouldn’t there be more movies about Super Villains than about Super Heroes? And isn’t it the villains who always win?

Kairos “Kairos is an ancient Greek word meaning the right or opportune moment (the supreme moment). The ancient Greeks had two words for time, chronos and kairos. While the former refers to chronological or sequential time, the latter signifies a time between, a moment of indeterminate time in which something special happens. What the special something is depends on who is using the word. While chronos is quantitative, kairos has a qualitative nature. Kairos also means weather in both ancient and modern Greek. The plural, kairoi means the times. “In rhetoric kairos is ‘a passing instant when an opening appears which must be driven through with force if success is to be achieved.’ “Kairos was central to the Sophists, who stressed the rhetor’s ability to adapt to and take advantage of changing, contingent circumstances. In Panathenaicus, Isocrates writes that educated people are those ‘who manage well the circumstances which they encounter day by day, and who possess a judgment which is accurate in meeting occasions as they arise and rarely misses the expedient course of action’. “Kairos is also very important in Aristotle’s scheme of rhetoric. Kairos is, for Aristotle, the time and space context in which the proof will be delivered. Kairos stands alongside other contextual elements of rhetoric: The Audience, which is the psychological and emotional makeup of those who will receive the proof; and To Prepon, which is the style with which the orator clothes the proof. “In the New Testament kairos means ‘the appointed time in the purpose of God’, the time when God acts (e.g. Mark 1.15, the kairos is fulfilled). It differs from the more usual word for time which is chronos (kronos).” – Wikipedia

The Persuaders Those who seek to persuade you use a whole battery of tactics. They deploy: 1) Pathos – the appeal to feelings. 2) Eros – the appeal to lust, desire, will. 3) Ethos – the appeal to character, to authority, to status, to celebrities (“winners”). 4) Mythos – the appeal to storytelling. Everything is framed within a short, impactful narrative. 5) Logos – the appeal to reason and fact (rarely used!) 6) Kairos – Getting the timing right. A high impact message must have perfect timing. Who uses these tactics on you? – politicians, the media, advertisers, spin doctors, lobbyists, propagandists, lawyers, and so on. They use emotive soundbites, emotive music, emotive images, emotive videos to brainwash you. All of these groups are the modern equivalents of the Sophists – those who would say and do anything to enrich themselves, to the total disgust of the philosophers. Everywhere you look in capitalist democracies, you will find Sophists. You’ll search in vain for philosophers in leading positions. That all changes in a meritocracy. Sophists are removed and replaced by philosophers. Logos replaces Mythos. Reason replaces irrational emotionalism. Illuminism is massively Logos-directed, as testified by the God Series. We don’t spin you silly yarns. We don’t demand your faith. We don’t use the carrot and stick operant conditioning tactics of Abrahamic heaven and hell. We treat you as adults, able to make up your own minds.

Why the Revolution is Inevitable Nineteenth century capitalism was so vile and repugnant that it was sure to trigger a dialectical response. It did, in the shape of Marxism, socialism and much wider democracy. For a century, capitalism found itself constrained and under existential threat, and had to tone itself down and adopt a caring

and sharing side. In 1989, communism and socialism failed. Immediately, the capitalist brakes came off and a huge transfer of wealth took place from the people to the super rich 1%. We have returned to the vile and repugnant capitalism of yesteryear where the rich keep taking more and more for themselves, with zero consideration for others. Marx was certain capitalism would be overthrown because its internal logic (fewer and fewer people commanding more and more power and wealth) was sure to make the people rise up against it in due course. Capitalism saved itself by reforming itself for a few decades, and because communism failed to provide a viable alternative. Now capitalism has returned to its core logic – let the rich get richer and richer at everyone else’s expense – and the internet is magnifying and accelerating this process to an incredible degree. The capitalists have learned nothing. The leopard hasn’t changed its spots. When the next financial crisis hits in the next few years – and it will because the capitalists are addicted to bubbles that inevitably burst – the people will once again be asked to bail out the banks and the rich. But the people won’t fall for it a second time. Next time round, capitalism will fail totally and the revolution will happen. It’s dialectically inevitable. It won’t be communism that replaces capitalism – that’s where Marx git it wrong – it will be meritocracy.

Intolerance The tolerant can tolerate anything but intolerance. To tolerate intolerance is to tolerate the intolerance of the intolerant and thus to be allies of their intolerance. Rather than resist their intolerance, you have become complicit with it. We hear of “Islamophobia”. In fact, anyone who is not Islamophobic is intolerant because Islam is an utterly intolerant religion and unless you oppose this evil ideology 100% then you are complicit with it, and supporting its endless vile practices. You are supporting the oppression of women, female and male genital mutilation, the death sentence for apostasy, the persecution of heretics and infidels, the brainwashing of children, the hatred of science and reason, the suppression of free speech, and so on. If you are not Islamophobic, you are absolutely intolerant, and you yourself should not be tolerated by all decent, tolerant people!

Keanu Reeves Keanu Reeves made £70 million from The Matrix trilogy, an absurdly large amount of money. However, incredibly, he then decided to hand over £50 million to the costume and special effects teams. Twenty-nine whizz-kids received a life-changing £1.75 million each. Well, hats off to Mr Reeves. Reeves said he already had enough cash and commented, “Money is the last thing I think about. I could live on what I have already made for the next few centuries.” What a refreshing attitude!

Faith Under all their bluster and fanaticism, people of faith are terrified. They’re regularly assailed by the most terrible doubts. They try to ward them off by sticking together with other believers. They all feed off each other and reinforce each other’s beliefs. If they were all to announce at the same time how much they doubted their beliefs, their religion would collapse there and then.

Syria It is said that more than a million children were forced to flee Syria because of the civil war raging there. The West is frequently blamed for “not doing enough”. But what does the Syrian civil war have to do with the West? Why isn’t Islam to blame? Why isn’t the Islamic world accused of “not doing enough”? After all, there are no Western non-Muslims fighting in Syria, only Muslims and some Syrian Christians. The cause of the civil war is bitter sectarian struggle between various Islamic factions. So, again, what does this have to do with the West? Isn’t it time blame was directed at those who are genuinely to blame? Isn’t it time Muslims themselves were blamed? But, of course, that’s not politically correct. We must all dutifully ignore the elephant in the room – Islamic fundamentalism and extremism.

Questions We can see the search terms that people use to arrive at our website. The following are several examples. What the fuck!

1) “How can I join the ‘world of soulless wealth’?” 2) “Do I become rich by joining the Illuminati?” 3) “Can I join the Illuminati, become rich and then leave?” 4) “Will the Illuminati make me perform human sacrifice before making me rich?” 5) “Can the Illuminati help me to make money fast?” 6) “Where can I join a secret fraternity for money and firmness?” 7) “How to ask God to help me win $1,000,000.” 8) “How to join Satanism for guaranteed wealth success?” 9) “If I want to join the Illuminati, must I kill the bread winner of the family?” 10) “If you’re a millionaire, do you have to sign the contract of the Illuminati?” 11) “Illuminati Nazi zombie cat army.” 12) “Is it true that Illuminati can make you rich and powerful?” 13) “If people claim to unlock higher consciousness, why aren’t they rich?” 14) “LORD CAUSE ME TO ADVANCE IN LIFE.” 15) “Will the Illuminati have something to do with the end of the human race?” 16) “What will the Illuminati take in return for giving me wealth?” 17) “Which secret cult can make me rich without harm?” 18) “How soon until the elites start killing the public?” 19) “Where I can gain the satanic power of maths and the sciences?” 20) “Which religion can I join to have a lot of money?” 21) “Stories of guys that God took from being insignificant to being millionaires.” 22) “Religions that when you join, you get money from them.”

23) “If you are an Illuminatus, do you have to kill your parents?” 24) “Are celebs in Hollywood soulless bodies?” 25) “Book of secrets to becoming wealthy and powerful.” 26) “Which society do most of the world stars join to be rich?” 27) “Richest God of all religion?” 28) “Does the government know secrets about God?” 29) “How to join the true Illuminati for money and fame?” 30) “Conspiracies to destroy the US dollar.” 31) “Can the Illuminati help me? I want to be a Face model.” 32) “God, if you were human I would give you a big hug right now.” 33) “Phone number of King of Devil worshippers who makes people join.” 34) “Do I have to have sex with a man just to be illuminated?” 35) “Which religion allows fucking with family members?” 36) “Can you become Illuminati or do you have to have six toes?” 37) “Are Lizards equivalent to gods or devils?”

***** You couldn’t make it up!

Currency Money is the currency of feelings. People have passionate feelings towards money because it delivers what they crave: power, status, security and freedom. The Old World Order are all about money ... about feelings. Ideas are the currency of thinking. A rational world is one where the people in charge are not the richest but the smartest.

Love of Politics? Some people describe themselves as “loving” politics and being obsessively interested in it. However, on closer inspection, what you discover is that

these people love political gossip, political scandals and political personalities and have more or less zero interest in, and knowledge of, political philosophy, i.e. the ideas that politics is actually all about. In fact, most politicians know nothing about political philosophy and never mention it. Most political commentators know nothing about political philosophy and never mention it. The average voter knows nothing about political philosophy and never mentions it. In other words, what passes as politics is not politics at all but tittle tattle, gossip, soundbites, posing, posturing, public relations, the cult of personality, and general nonsense. The closest description of the political dispensation of today is “idiocracy” – rule by idiots.

The Power of Introversion The world needs to “revalue all values”, exactly as Nietzsche advocated. The world is ruled by extraverted sensing and feeling types. It needs to be ruled by introverted thinking and intuitive types. It’s time for smart people to take power from the vulgar, moronic extraverts. The extraverts are responsible for this shithole of a world we live in. Introversion is the antidote. Extraverts spread the lie that introversion is boring. In fact, it’s extraverts that are shallow, trivial, tedious and vacuous. They are the “bread and circuses” masses, the lowest common denominator, the instantgratification mob, the self-indulgent, self-obsessed narcissists always engaged in the race for the bottom. They want to go as low as they can go. They want to lie in the gutter looking at the shit. Introversion is the path to divinity, and extraversion the road to hell.

Rhetoric So, what’s it to be? – 1) “Say No” ... negative liberty (often used by anarchists, libertarians and everyone who opposes the government and the State. 2) “Say Yes” – positive liberty (used by those who want to work together to create heaven on earth and a human race elevated to divinity.

“No” is self-evidently a negative expression and “Yes” positive. Everyone should want to find for themselves a system where they can usually say Yes and rarely say No. Be positive. Go forward. Don’t be negative. Don’t go backwards.

Upselling “Upselling is a sales technique whereby a seller induces the customer to purchase more expensive items, upgrades, or other add-ons in an attempt to make a more profitable sale. Upselling usually involves marketing more profitable services or products but can be simply exposing the customer to other options that were perhaps not considered. Upselling implies selling something that is more profitable or otherwise preferable for the seller instead of, or in addition to, the original sale.” – Wikipedia Life is one big upsell on every level.

What is the New World Order? A New Politics – The Replacement of Democracy by Meritocracy. A New Economics – The Replacement of Predatory Free-Market Capitalism with Productive Social Capitalism. A New Religion – The Replacement of the old, failed and false Mythos religions with the world’s only rational Logos religion: the religion of ontological mathematics that delivers a dialectical metamorphosis (via mathematical optimization) of all human beings into gods. A New Social Order – The Replacement, through 100% Inheritance Tax and the abolition of all means for private individuals to pass on overwhelming financial advantages and privileges to other private individuals (family members) at the expense of the Commonwealth, of the Dynastic Family Elites that rule the world. Any transaction between private individuals that involves a vast transfer of wealth which allows unelected, unaccountable people to wield decisive influence over the Commonwealth is a subversion of the Commonwealth, and the precise means by which the 1% have come to rule the 99%. Anyone who is on the side of the people must oppose private inheritance. If you support inheritance, you are a

supporter of the dynastic elites, a traitor to, and an enemy of, the people. You believe that people should get something for nothing, that people should be rewarded not for their own efforts but for those of others (their parents). You believe in parasitism and rewarding failures, incompetents, people with no backbone who can’t stand up for themselves and make their own way in life. No one who accepts an inheritance has any self-respect, or is worthy of any respect. They are family versions of welfare scroungers, taking money for nothing. A New Dispensation: The World must be Rebooted. The only way to reboot it is to bring to an end the control of the vast bulk of the world’s assets by a tiny private elite who stand outside the political process and yet completely dominate that process. Capitalist Democracy has nothing to do with democracy and everything to do with the capitalist control of the people. In other words, capitalist democracy is rule by rich capitalist oligarchs. The ancient Athenians invented democracy precisely to overthrow such people. They would be spinning in their graves if they could see what “democracy” now is – rule by the super rich cynically and wickedly being presented as rule by the people. Capitalist democracy is the biggest con since Abrahamism, the other primary means for deceiving and enslaving the people. A New Science – The replacement of Scientific Materialism by Ontological Mathematics.

***** What is ontological mathematics? Mathematics is not a human construct like the English language. It’s the language of existence itself and is a precondition for human life. Human beings don’t invent mathematics, they tune into it, they discover it, they are everywhere immersed in it. We exist in a cosmic ocean of mathematics. Mathematics, ontologically, is energy – precise mathematical energy defined by analytic sine and cosine waves. These constitute the ultimate dynamic information system. Energy comes in specific bundles known as monads. There are countless monads, and each of them is an uncaused, uncreated, autonomous, immortal, indestructible information system – a soul! A soul is a 100%

mathematical entity. It’s a pure sine and cosine energy system. It’s a selfoptimizing information system. A soul is both an object and a subject. To other souls, each soul is an object. To itself, a soul is a subject. It subjectively experiences information. A computer – a human mathematical construct – processes information but does not experience it (because a computer is not alive). A monad is an eternal, natural, living, mathematical entity. It not only receives, generates and processes information, it also experiences all of that information. It senses it and feels it, and it seeks to optimize it – ultimately to solve its own inner equation and become God.

***** The Old World Order has utterly failed. It’s time for the New World Order. Anyone who opposes a new way of doing things is a conservative, a reactionary, a counter-revolutionary, and a friend and ally of the ruling elites. The current world is designed in their image. If you want a new image that reflects you, you must support the Meritocratic New World Order that ends inheritance, nepotism, cronyism, privilege and “who you know” and replaces these with talent, “what you know” and “what you can do”.

***** Free-Market Capitalism – rule by the rich (by the 1%). Abrahamism – rule by the Devil (a “God” that orders fathers to perform human sacrifice on their sons as a “test”). Democracy – Dumbocracy: rule by dumb asses. Freedom – Freedumb to be the slaves of the Devil and the rich capitalists.

***** Fuck Jehovah Fuck Jesus Fuck Allah Fuck Karma

Fuck the 1% Fuck the “Market” Fuck Privilege Fuck Nepotism Fuck Cronyism Fuck Inheritance

***** The New World Order delivers the second and final Enlightenment. It enshrines reason, not money or God, at the apex of human values. It’s about guaranteed equal opportunities for all. The Meritocratic State makes a social contract with every citizen to optimize each and every one of them. The Meritocratic State is committed to positive liberty and the transformation of humanity and the world. It’s time to cast down the old gods and rulers and, for the first time ever, build heaven on earth for the whole human race. The super rich and the Devil-worshipers (the Jews, the Christians and the Muslims) are the obstacles to rational human progress. It’s to the problem constituted by them that Logos humanity (HyperHumanity) must find the Final Solution.

Confidence “The reason we struggle with insecurity is because we compare our behind the scenes with everyone else’s highlight reel.” – Steve Furtick This is true of those lacking in confidence. Confident people do it the other way around. They think only of their own highlight reels and everyone else’s “behind the scenes”. “No one can make you feel inferior without your consent.” – Eleanor Roosevelt So don’t consent.

The Wisdom of Eleanor Roosevelt

“The future belongs to those who believe in the beauty of their dreams.” – Eleanor Roosevelt “Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people.” – Eleanor Roosevelt “We gain strength, and courage, and confidence by each experience in which we really stop to look fear in the face... we must do that which we think we cannot.” – Eleanor Roosevelt “Happiness is not a goal; it is a by-product.” – Eleanor Roosevelt “You must do the things you think you cannot do.” – Eleanor Roosevelt

The List What we need: Small-scale capitalism (Small Is Beautiful: A Study of Economics As If People Mattered by British economist E. F. Schumacher.) – no multinationals, no globalism, no corporatocracy, no privileged market players, a level playing field, the same market conditions for everyone, no Wall Street. There must be State ownership of the banks. The economy must be under direct government (public) control, not private capitalist control (unelected and unaccountable to the people). The economy should be run on the same basis as the military. All the economic “generals”, “admirals” and “commanders” must be public officials, serving the public and national interest. There should be an economic West Point where all of the most talented economists are specifically trained for economic public service. The State (the Commonwealth) must own the entire economic infrastructure on behalf of all the people. All those in positions that affect the public good must be appointed officials, elected and accountable. They will all be meritocrats, democratically elected by their peers. In a Meritocracy, democratic voting is not eliminated but is instead made rationally valid: you can vote on what you know about (via academic qualifications, citizen exams or work experience), but, unlike in a democracy, you can’t vote on anything for which you are not qualified. Standard democracy is about quantity rather

than quality. You simply need to reach the age (quantity of life) of 18 or 21 to be allowed to vote, and you can then vote on anything, regardless of your quality, talent or knowledge. (“Democracy is only an experiment in government, and it has the obvious disadvantage of merely counting votes instead of weighing them.” – Dean Inge) In a Meritocracy, a strict quality criterion is applied. You can vote on anything for which you are qualified (a qualitative consideration), and otherwise you cannot vote. 100% inheritance tax will wipe out dynastic elites and continuously reboot the world, thus enabling authentic equal opportunities. To oppose us is to oppose reason, sanity, intelligence, the General Will, the public good, the Commonwealth, merit, quality and excellence. Any thinking person can see that ours is the only possible way forward. We do not seek the support of the stupid, only that of the smartest people in the world. Are you one of them?

The Commonwealth No matter how much the rich have, they always want more. And the richer you are, the more you get (“money makes money”). And the more you get, the less others get, so you are actively making the poor poorer. Isn’t that the world we live in? That’s how we have the 1% versus the 99%. They will take everything from us, unless we take it all back from them. We must live in a Commonwealth (public wealth), not the Uncommonwealth (private wealth).

The Secret State We often hear about a sinister “secret State”. We never hear about the secret, sinister capitalist elite, outside the political process but controlling the political process. They are the ones we have most to worry about.

Fiction Novelists write fiction. Lawyers speak fiction. The law, delivered in a court (“the stage”), in legal jargon (“the script”), often by people in robes and wigs (“the costume”) is simply fiction delivered “by other means”. The law is just a story, a fairytale version of events delivered to jurors raised on fairytales and Bible stories, who know

all the tropes. The task of the lawyer is to engage the relevant storyline that the jurors understand. You know you are being told a fictional story whenever anyone is dressed in a costume. All monarchs, all soldiers, all police, all priests and popes, all people wearing religious symbols, all people wearing a corporate uniform, all people wearing a team strip – they are all in the world of fiction, of narrative, of falsehood, of fraud, of propaganda.

Once a Soldier, Always a Soldier Ex-soldiers regularly talk of having been “abandoned”. They say it is as if they have been thrown out by their “family”. One former soldier said that he felt “safe” in the army, that it was a “security net”, that it gave you everything, did everything for you, and organised everything for you. What suddenly becomes apparent is that soldiers are helpless submissives who need officers to order them around and define their day and indeed their lives. When they leave the army, these ex soldiers are wholly unable to cope since, in civvy street, there’s no one giving them orders anymore, and no one organising their life for them. Soldiers long to say, “Sir”, to be in a system of strict discipline, to obey military protocol. They become infuriated by the simplest things in normal life because all of their military expectations have ceased to apply. The horrific truth is that most soldiers are simply big children who can’t cope with life. Most of them are desperately lonely and crave “comradeship.” They are wholly unable to be independent, autonomous individuals, capable of structuring their own lives and taking responsibility for themselves. They want the army to put a roof over their heads. They want to “belong”. The army is their identity and, without it, they are lost.

St Basil’s Cathedral It is said that St Basil’s Cathedral in Red Square in Moscow was designed to allow “everyone to spy on everyone”. Tsar Ivan the Terrible, who commissioned it, either blinded the architects to prevent them from ever designing anything so beautiful again, or killed them to preserve its secrets, and the whereabouts of the secret passages provided for spying. Is St Basil’s not the perfect metaphor for the Old World Order?

God Help Us

It is said that God helps those who help themselves. But those who help themselves don’t need God. Why doesn’t God help those who can’t help themselves?

Pre-Christian Vampires How were vampires stopped before there were any crosses or holy water? How were werewolves killed before there were any silver bullets? Different ages, different cultures and different religions all have their different ways of fighting their monsters!

Eternally Twenty-Five If sixty is the new forty and ten is the new sixteen, eventually all ages will be the new twenty-five. Everyone, no matter what age they are, will behave like a twenty-five-year old. The young will be old before their time, and the old will never grow up. We can see it happening everywhere. It’s the basis of capitalism and advertising.

Koranic Society Over forty percent of Egyptians are illiterate. That’s what a society devoted to the Koran, Mohammed and Allah achieves – mass retardation!

The Afterlife “Life is about the afterlife.” – a British Islamic Jihadist fighting in Syria No, life is about life. Islam is not only stupid, it’s also a sick death cult.

The “Big Society”? Negative liberty means minimal State interference in people’s lives. Negative libertarians advocate the “small” State, minimal State spending, minimal State power and, above all, minimal State regulation and supervision of the super rich, banks and corporations. Capitalist democracy is negative libertarian. Capitalist democracy is all about the State staying out of people’s religious beliefs, customs and practices, about the State staying out of the world of private wealth, influence and lobbying, about the State staying out of the affairs of the family, no matter how dysfunctional. In essence, negative liberty is about

the worship of the private over the public, the individual over the collective. Yet this inevitably leads to social fragmentation, atomisation and disintegration. Margaret Thatcher, former Conservative Prime Minister of the UK, proudly stated, “There is no such thing as society” – and that’s the quintessence of negative liberty. It’s all about individuals and families, and despises and rejects community, society and the State. Positive liberty means maximal State intervention in people’s lives in order to transform human beings into something greater, and to build heaven on earth. All positive liberty States are idealistic and Utopian (whereas negative liberty States ate materialistic, empiricist, pragmatic and leave utopia to the private religious sphere). Positive liberty States have a grand vision for human beings: negative liberty States have no vision at all for human beings. Positive liberty States promote the public over the private while negative liberty States promote the private over the public. Positive liberty States look to the common good, General Will and Commonwealth while negative liberty States look to the private good, particular wills and private wealth. Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron – an archetypal privately educated, elitist negative libertarian has shown the moral and intellectual bankruptcy of negative libertarian thinking by advocating the “Big Society”. This is clearly a positive liberty idea and yet, in the hands of a negative libertarian such as Cameron, it becomes an attack on positive liberty. The “Big Society” involves unpaid volunteers, receiving no State funding (so no expansion of the influence of the State) starting up projects to improve their local communities (so no grand visions of human transformation and the building of utopias). The Big Society is a negative liberty attempt to improve community relations (which are traditionally undermined by negative liberty), without involving the State. The Big Society stands in direct opposition to the Big State. But, of course, there is nothing big about the Big Society at all. It’s all about the small society – the local community. Negative libertarians are always trying to think up ways to correct the anti-social effects produced by their own ideology of the sanctity of the private (of the individual and the family). Nothing they do will ever succeed. Negative liberty has only one consequence: the tyranny of rich,

private elites that put themselves beyond the power of the State (of the people, the Commonwealth). 100% inheritance tax is designed to destroy private elites, private wealth and private power, hence is the defining element of positive liberty.

***** The “free” market driven by the “invisible hand” is the economic core of the negative liberty ideology. The market has no plans to improve the human race or build utopia. It exists purely to facilitate trade and make the best traders extremely rich. It has nothing to do with the public good, the Commonwealth and the General Will. It is neither rational nor moral. How on earth did our fates become tied to such a thing? You might as well be manacled to Satan! Positive liberty is all about a planned economy based on rational objectives and promoting morality (in the sense that it defines what is good – equal opportunities, the General Will, the Commonwealth, the public good – and what is bad – privilege, inheritance, the particular will, the private good, cronyism and nepotism). Star Trek is the supreme positive liberty vision. Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged is the supreme negative liberty vision. Well, which is it to be?

***** Why do negative libertarians hate the United Nations, the European Union, the Catholic Church, Jesuits, the Roman Empire, Babylon, the “one-world” government, the “one-world” currency, Plato’s Republic, and the “New World Order”? It’s because all of these are positive liberty projects. The Illuminati are the ultimate Hegelian and Platonic advocates of the New World Order and positive liberty. Our grand project is to transform humans into Gods, and earth into heaven. Are you for us or against us? We will alchemically transmute the world through ontological mathematics and Reason.

***** All anarchists, libertarians, anarcho-capitalist libertarians and free-market capitalists are negative libertarians. They are the great enemy, the great Satan, that must be overcome.

***** Virtually all conspiracy theories revolve around conservative, right-wing terror of left wing positive liberty projects. Ayn Rand’s right-wing Bible – Atlas Shrugged – is about a right wing negative libertarian elite facing down and defeating a left wing positive libertarian elite.

***** Negative libertarians are driven by the Freudian Id (pleasure principle) and positive libertarians by the Freudian Ego (reality principle) and Superego (morality principle). Negative libertarians are driven by the Jungian Persona, Shadow and Ego, and positive libertarians by the Jungian Anima/Animus, Mana personalities and the Self. Negative libertarians are tradition- and inner-directed, and positive libertarians are autonomous. Other-directed types can go either way. Negative libertarians are selfish, greedy, self-obsessed, materialistic, empiricist and fearful while positive libertarians are altruistic, generous, interested in the welfare of the group, idealistic, rationalist and brave. Negative liberty is centred on the individual and family, positive liberty on the collective and community. Negative libertarians are right wing and conservative while positive libertarians are left wing and radical. Negative libertarians are “Protestants” and positive libertarians “Catholics”. Negative libertarians are democratic and positive libertarians meritocratic. Negative libertarians are free-market capitalists and positive libertarians social capitalists. Negative libertarians are “Protestants” and positive libertarians “Catholics”. Negative libertarians are anti-Statists and positive libertarians Statists. Negative libertarians are advocates of the private and positive libertarians of the public.

Negative libertarians side with the particular will and positive libertarians with the General Will. Negative libertarians are extraverted sensing and feeling types, lacking in self-awareness. Positive libertarians are introverted intuitive and thinking types, highly self-aware. Negative libertarians are addicted to Mythos and positive libertarians to Logos. Negative libertarians are the past and positive libertarians the future. Negative libertarians are closer to beasts than gods, positive libertarians closer to gods than beasts. Negative libertarians are “Believers” and positive libertarians “Knowers” (Gnostics). Negative libertarians worship an exterior God while positive libertarians look to an interior God (their own Higher Self). The negative-liberty/positive-liberty axis is one of the central axes around which human life revolves. What about you? Where do you stand?

***** Star Trek is a positive liberty vision of humanity. Negative libertarians would fight a Star Trek utopian meritocracy every step of the way since Star Trek enshrines the end of free-market capitalism, mainstream religion and the Old World Order. Public service rather than private service (selfservice) is the ruling ethos and morality of the Star Trek world. Star Trek represents the worst nightmare of negative libertarians. Star Trek is a oneworld government, a New World Order, an enlightened Platonic meritocracy, and a society of Hegelian dialectical becoming, reflecting Rousseau’s General Will. There is no inheritance and no privilege in Star Trek. The power of the dynastic family elites has been completely destroyed.

*****

The leading negative liberty nations are the USA and the UK. The leading positive liberty nations are Germany and France.

***** Negative libertarians consistently demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect: “The Dunning-Kruger effect, named after David Dunning and Justin Kruger of Cornell University, occurs when incompetent people not only perform a task poorly or incompetently, but lack the competence to realize their own incompetence at a task and thus consider themselves much more competent than everyone else. Put more crudely, they’re too stupid to realize they’re stupid. (The inverse also applies: competent people tend to underestimate their ability compared to others.)” – http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Dunning-Kruger_effect That is, negative libertarians are too stupid to realize how stupid they are. They are emotionalists and irrationalists.

Ayn Rand and Negative Liberty “Every honest man lives for himself. Every man worth calling a man lives for himself. The one who doesn’t – doesn’t live at all.” – Ayn Rand “We are on strike against those who believe that one man must exist for the sake of another.” – Ayn Rand “When I say ‘capitalism,’ I mean a full, pure, uncontrolled, unregulated laissez-faire capitalism – with a separation of state and economics, in the same way and for the same reasons as the separation of state and church.” – Ayn Rand “When you consider socialism, do not fool yourself about its nature. Remember that there is no such dichotomy as ‘human rights’ versus ‘property rights.’ No human rights can exist without property rights.” – Ayn Rand “I am not primarily an advocate of capitalism, but of egoism...” – Ayn Rand “I swear by my life, and my love of it, that I will never live for the sake of another man...” – Ayn Rand

“My philosophy, in essence, is the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life...” – Ayn Rand “There is no such thing as duty.” – Ayn Rand “I can say – not as a patriotic bromide, but with full knowledge of the necessary metaphysical, epistemological, ethical, political, and aesthetic roots – that the United States of America is the greatest, the noblest and, in its original founding principles, the only moral country in the history of the world.” – Ayn Rand “America’s abundance was created not by public sacrifices to the common good, but by the productive genius of free men who pursued their own personal interests and the making of their own private fortunes.” – Ayn Rand “Businessmen are the one group that distinguishes capitalism and the American way of life from the totalitarian statism that is swallowing the rest of the world. ... Businessmen are the symbol of a free society – the symbol of America.” – Ayn Rand “Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others.” – Ayn Rand “Every movement that seeks to enslave a country, every dictatorship or potential dictatorship, needs some minority group as a scapegoat which it can blame for the nation’s troubles and use as a justification of its own demands for dictatorial powers. In Soviet Russia, the scapegoat was the bourgeoisie; in Nazi Germany, it was the Jewish people; in America, it is the businessmen.” – Ayn Rand (That’s right, Ayn, Wall Street – all the super rich bankers and corporatocrats – have all been hideously persecuted by the American people and the government in Washington D.C. WTF!) “If you ask me to name the proudest distinction of Americans, I would choose – because it contains all the others – the fact that they were the people who created the phrase ‘to make money’.” – Ayn Rand

*****

“In neo-classical economic theory, it is claimed without evidence that people are basically self-seeking, that they want above all the satisfaction of their material desires: what economists call ‘maximising utility’. The ultimate objective of mankind is economic growth, and that is maximized only through raw, and lightly regulated, competition. If the rewards of this system are spread unevenly, that is a necessary price. Others on the planet are to be regarded as either customers, competitors or factors of production. Effects upon the planet itself are mere ‘externalities’ to the model, with no reckoning of the cost – at least for now. Nowhere in this analysis appears factors such as human cooperation, love, trust, compassion or hatred, curiosity or beauty. Nowhere appears the concept of meaning. What cannot be measured is ignored. But the trouble is that once our basic needs for shelter and food have been met, these factors may be the most important of all.” – Carne Ross “I have to say I found Ayn Rand’s philosophy laughable. It was ‘a white supremacist dreams of the master race,’ burnt in an early-20th century form. Her ideas didn’t really appeal to me, but they seemed to be the kind of ideas that people would espouse, people who might secretly believe themselves to be part of the elite, and not part of the excluded majority.” – Alan Moore “I have always found it quaint and rather touching that there is a movement [Libertarians] in the US that thinks Americans are not yet selfish enough.” – Christopher Hitchens “This odd little woman is attempting to give a moral sanction to greed and self interest, and to pull it off she must at times indulge in purest Orwellian newspeak of the ‘freedom is slavery’ sort. What interests me most about her is not the absurdity of her ‘philosophy,’ but the size of her audience (in my campaign for the House she was the one writer people knew and talked about). She has a great attraction for simple people who are puzzled by organized society, who object to paying taxes, who dislike the ‘welfare’ state, who feel guilt at the thought of the suffering of others but who would like to harden their hearts. For them, she has an enticing prescription: altruism is the root of all evil, self-interest is the only good, and if you’re dumb or incompetent that’s your lookout.” – Gore Vidal “Ayn Rand’s ‘philosophy’ is nearly perfect in its immorality.” – Gore Vidal

Waiting for the Messiah A well-known false meme is that Jews are buried upright, or even head down (upside down). What is true is that Jews have the bottom of the coffin removed for when the Messiah comes! (Makes it easier to clamber out of the coffin for the Resurrection of the Dead, though it must be difficult for the re-animated corpses to claw their way through all the dirt under which they’re buried.) When the Messiah Comes – the Jewish Night of the Living Dead!

***** Jews cover all the mirrors at funerals. No vanity is allowed. Or is it because they might be revealed as blood-sucking vampires?! (Another theory is that mirrors trap the soul, hence why none should be present at a funeral.)

The State Versus the Market The State is run by identifiable, elected, accountable people. The Market is run by unidentified, unelected and unaccountable elites. Which side are you on? Do you support the visible hand of reason or the invisible hand of the market? Are you are a rationalist or an irrationalist?

WTF! The Muslim police of Dubai drive a fancy fleet of supercars. They can choose from the Ferrari FF, Lamborghini Aventador, Mercedes SLS, Bentley Continental GT Coupe and Aston Martin One-77. It has been called a “pimped out superfleet.” Watch out for the Bling police in their Bling cars, armed with Bling Korans and Bling guns. Oil-rich Muslims can certainly buy fancy cars. Of course, they can’t design and make them. The Koran doesn’t know what a car is!

The Engine of the World Watergate was all about “Follow the money”. How did the elite respond? Their mantra became “Hide the money – so that no one can follow it.” The subject of hiding money, of laundering money, of disguising money, is now is as important as it gets – because it’s driving our world. It’s “legal” for the

charmed circle of the ruling elite to hide their assets, and “illegal” for everyone else. No government anywhere on earth sets up elite tax investigation teams to find out where the assets of the rich are hidden. There’s aggressive tax evasion and aggressive tax avoidance but no aggressive tax detection. Funny, that! You would almost suspect the tax evaders and avoiders are running the world (ahem).

Alternative Reality Keanu Reeves did a superb job as Neo in The Matrix. But Reeves was not first choice. That was Will Smith. Nicolas Cage was also in the running, as were Brad Pitt and Val Kilmer. Johnny Depp was the Wachowskis’ first choice. As for Morpheus, Gary Oldman and Samuel L. Jackson were considered for the part. Sean Connery was offered the role of the Architect.

The First Exploitative Business SB: “The one thing I remember from a sociology class was that ancient people gave thanks to god, plants, sun, and mother earth and it was the church that told these people they needed the church to pray for them. The church became the first business, the first middleman between humans and god. God doesn’t need money, churches, etc. We know the Bible has been created from translations from other ancient texts. We know it has been rewritten many times and there are several versions. We know god and mother nature are simple, yet filled with love, so why is the Bible so complicated? It was written by priests and we know there are books that are missing. Why? Because they, the priests, didn’t want us to know our true self, that we are children of the gods, that we are made in the gods’ image. If we are children of gods, then we are gods too. If we are made in the image of gods, we are gods. All of the truth was hidden from us. Why? For control, for money, etc.” What is the core policy of the Abrahamic priest caste? – to make you terrified that you are sinful and thus damned, hence need to be saved. Who will save you? Well, the Abrahamic priest caste, of course. They invented the disease to which they pose as the cure. They did so to control and enslave you, and in the process make themselves extremely powerful: gods

on earth. Abrahamism is psychological warfare against the weak-minded, submissive, gullible, credulous, irrational and superstitious.

RIP “For to be free is not merely to cast off one’s chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others.” – Nelson Mandela This is a wonderful statement of true, positive liberty. The negative libertarian is consumed with deranged, selfish, egoistic pursuit of his own liberty, and screw everyone else. The positive libertarian knows that his own freedom increases in direct proportion with that of everyone else. You are not free if others are slaves. Absurdly, the Confederacy fought in the name of “liberty” while savagely depriving Africans of theirs. That’s negative liberty in a nutshell. The Union fought for positive liberty: freedom for all. In the modern day, the Republicans, Tea Party and anarcho-capitalist libertarians are the new Confederates (anti-State; pro freedom for some and slavery for others; pro private good and private power) and the Democrats the new Union (pro-State; pro freedom for all; pro public good and public power). “In my country we go to prison first and then become President.” –Nelson Mandela “There is no passion to be found playing small – in settling for a life that is less than the one you are capable of living.” – Nelson Mandela “It always seems impossible until it’s done.” – Nelson Mandela

The Stupidity of Right Wingers “I never meant to say that the Conservatives are generally stupid. I meant to say that stupid people are generally Conservative.” – John Stuart Mill “Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.” – John Stuart Mill “Stupidity is much the same all the world over. A stupid person’s notions and feelings may confidently be inferred from those which prevail in the circle by which the person is surrounded. Not so with those whose opinions

and feelings are an emanation from their own nature and faculties.” – John Stuart Mill Stupid people are either: 1) other-directed (liberal; controlled by the values of their peer group), 2) tradition-directed (conservative; controlled by the values of the traditions they were born into, such as Islam, Christianity or Judaism), or 3) inner-directed (extremist; controlled by the values instilled in them by their parents). Clever people are autonomous, controlled by their own freely chosen values.

A Candidate for the Greatest Song Lyrics Ever Adam Levine by Electric Six (from the album Mustang) ***** Give all your money to Adam Levine But Adam Levine don’t need your money .... Burn in hell Rot in hell Burn in hell Motherfucker .... Keep our popular music clean Give all your money to Adam Levine He’s running around with a Malibu Queen In Aspen she’s a real snow-bunny .... Burn in hell Rot in hell Burn in hell

Motherfucker .... They’re mass producing Adam Levine .... Burn in hell Rot in hell Burn in hell Motherfucker ***** http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1mB9OOdlHs Excellent song! ... Buy the Album **************************

Fat Days Women have “fat” days and “thin” days, “good hair” days and “bad hair” days, “pretty” days and “ugly” days. They are confident and optimistic on thin, good hair and pretty days and unconfident and pessimistic on fat, bad hair and ugly days.

Fat Talking Fat talking is when you put yourself down about how you look or how you dress or how you do things. Female teenagers are the experts at fat talking. “I’m so fat today”; “I feel fat”; “You’re so skinny”; “You’re so pretty”; “You dress so well”. All fat talkers are submissives lacking self-esteem. They all suffer from body dissatisfaction. Strangely enough, they are the ones most likely to be obsessed with fashion magazines featuring unnaturally skinny women.

***** Presumably, the opposite of fat talk is skinny talk.

***** The “Thin Ideal”. “She’s skinny”; “She’s perfect”; “I want to be skinny like her “You can never be too rich or too thin.” – Dorothy Parker

Poison Compliments A subtle means of fat talking about others rather than about oneself is by using “poison compliments”. If you say, “Oh, you’ve lost weight”, it might seem that you’re delivering a compliment but it can equally be interpreted as an insult about the other person’s previous fatter state, hence it’s a poison compliment. Putting yourself down is a form of narcissism. Why are you so obsessed with yourself and with what others think about you? Grow a pair!

Monoculture For a nation to have an identity – to be a people rather than a mere population – it must have a monoculture. In multicultural societies, each separate culture confers an identity, so there is no national identity but many disparate, disunited identities, and you have a population rather than a united people all working together for the common good. All multicultural societies are doomed to fail. Only a united people (belonging to a monoculture) can progress. Multicultural societies oppose the General Will in favour of particular wills, and go hand-in-hand with negative liberty and religious extremism and ghettoism. All positive libertarians must oppose multiculturalism.

The Messiah? Great man though he was, Nelson Mandela was no Messiah, yet he was given the funeral of a Messiah. This type of thing is catastrophic for the world. It implies that we need Messiahs before anything can change, and that these are one in a billion individuals, hence we’re all fucked until the next Messiah appears. Moreover, the political powers-that-be have feasted over the corpse of Mandela to promote their own self-serving agendas and present themselves as Mandela-like figures and fellow travellers. What a nauseating spectacle. Pure propaganda for the world elites. Fuck Messiahs! It’s up to the people to change the world. Fuck Messianic funerals. Ignore them. Do something positive with your life.

Achieve something. Don’t waste your time on the Society of the Spectacle and the Funeral as Political Spectacle and Political Weapon to reinforce the ideology of the ruling order.

***** “The ANC is a typical terrorist organisation ... Anyone who thinks it is going to run the government in South Africa is living in cloud-cuckoo land” – Margaret Thatcher, 1987 “How much longer will the Prime Minister allow herself to be kicked in the face by this black terrorist?” – Terry Dicks MP “Nelson Mandela should be shot.” – Teddy Taylor MP “This hero worship is very much misplaced.” – John Carlisle MP Margaret Thatcher branded Nelson Mandela a terrorist, yet Mandela was more than happy to shake her hand and that of the English queen. Mandela was a great man, but not exactly a man of principle, integrity and honour. A mere politician when all is said and done – a double talker. He would have been a world-historic figure if he had condemned all predatory, ultracapitalists like Thatcher, and treated with absolute contempt hereditary monarchs such as the English queen. Sadly, he was, in the end, not so different from all the other politicians. Just better at playing the PR game. He had a saintlier image, but one with no real substance. His greatness lay in enduring prison for over quarter of a century and not coming out hellbent on a bloodbath of revenge. But it wasn’t saintliness that was responsible for that: it was age, maturity ... and infirmity.

***** Why do the elite love Mandela so much? Because he proved himself no Caesar, no Robespierre, no Saint-Just, no Lenin ... no Malcolm X. He didn’t produce any kind of Black Panther government, did he? The financial disparity between rich whites and poor blacks in South Africa is now even greater than it was before Mandela and the ANC came to power, and the ANC leadership are notorious for being corrupt and lining their own pockets at every opportunity. So, now you know why the rich elite will always adore politicians like Mandela.

***** Nelson Mandela’s Memorial service took place on a horribly wet, miserable day. However, it was said that this was a great sign: the heavens had opened for Nelson. Of course, if it had been a wonderfully sunny day that would have been a great sign too. In fact, no matter what kind of day it was, you can be sure it would still have been interpreted as a great sign one way or another. That’s religion for you! Why can’t someone simply say, “It’s a rotten day, but we’re going to have a great time”? Even better, why not erupt into, “We’re Singing in the Rain!”

***** Well, you couldn’t make it up. The prominently positioned signer (sign language expert) used at the Mandela Memorial service was a fake! Bruno Druchen, national director of the Deaf Federation of South Africa, said the sign language interpreter “was moving his hands around but there was no meaning in what he used his hands for.” How is such a thing possible given that many of the world’s leaders were there? Even more incredibly, the same man had been used by the ANC several times before and been complained about several times before! He gave an interview saying he suffered from mental health issues and was taking medication for schizophrenia (er, isn’t that a PR risk, never mind a shocking security risk?). Apparently, he was hallucinating and “hearing voices” during the Memorial service, but, sadly, Nelson Mandela’s voice clearly wasn’t amongst them.

***** You couldn’t make it up part two. Archbishop Desmond Tutu’s house was burgled while he was delivering a prayer at Nelson Mandela’s Memorial service, and pleading with everyone to be more like the great man. What a world!

***** “If you’re not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing.” – Malcolm X

If you’re not careful, the elite will have you loving the leaders they want you to love, and hating the leaders they want you to hate.

What Did Mandela Do Wrong? When Popes, Presidents, Prime Ministers, the Super Rich and Celebrities come along to your funeral, you know you must have done something terribly wrong. When the Elite canonize you, it means you have been their friend, ally and fellow traveller – and thus an enemy of the people! And watch out for those Praise Singers! One day, they’ll damn you with faint praise. And where did the Sarcasm Singers go? During a Roman Triumph, when a great heroic general, victorious in battle, was deliriously hailed by the people on a grand procession through the city, a slave was positioned behind him on his chariot to whisper in his ear, “Respice post te! Hominem te esse memento! Memento mori!” – Look behind you! Remember that you are a man! Remember that you’ll die! A general who thought himself a god was the most dangerous thing in ancient Rome. Just look at Caesar!

***** Mandela was praised for serving his nation and “doing his duty”. These are things that could never be said of negative libertarians. They consistently oppose government and the State and regard their only duty as to themselves, their family and their God.

Repellent Having trouble with the local mosque? Why not try the new brand of Mosque-ito repellent? It’s bacon-scented for extra efficacy. Problem with your local Christian chapel? Buy some Chapellent, effective against all brands of Christian faith. Comes with a free can of Syna-Gone for dealing with any local Jewish difficulties. And watch out for the Jesu-twits.

Dream Religion Mohammed’s sole authority for his claims that he was telling the truth about reality was a set of dreams about a conversation with an angel! Moses’ authority was an alleged conversation with God at the summit of

Mount Sinai (or with a burning bush!). Jesus’ authority was that he was in intimate conversation with God because he was his Son!

Mythos Beliefs Do you believe in virgin births, water becoming wine, angels giving books to illiterates, people coming back from the dead, talking asses, talking bushes, an ancient tribesman travelling hundreds of miles in a night and ascending to the seventh heaven yet being back in his tent by dawn, wandering stars halting over stables, Eastern kings visiting Jewish babies, seas parting, water gushing out of rocks when struck by a staff, food falling from the heavens, city walls collapsing because of trumpet blasts, every firstborn creature in a nation being assassinated, fiery pillars, men living inside whales, and so on. You really couldn’t make it up. Er, hold on a moment, you definitely could. And they did! There’s never any end of ludicrous, invented human stories. Just go to any library or bookshop and see for yourself. Mythos is not constrained by any truth at all. It has no requirement to be rational. It obeys no reality principle. It can be whatever you want it to be.

Clap! The young dictator of North Korea executed his uncle for, amongst other things, not clapping enthusiastically enough when his nephew was confirmed as the new leader. What message does that send out? Unenthusiastic clapping constitutes high treason, worthy of the death penalty! The North Korean communist dictators have obviously been taking lessons from the Abrahamic God. He sends all “infidels” (those who don’t clap him) to hell forever!

Downward Mobility In Chicago, over fifty percent of African Americans born into a lowpoverty home environment end up in a high poverty home environment. For White Americans, the corresponding figure is less than ten percent. For the WASP elite, the figure is zero. WASPs do not experience downward mobility!

*****

The rate of incarceration in the most deprived African American project of Chicago is forty times more than that of the poorest white area. Where you come from overwhelmingly decides where you’re going (jail, oftentimes!). Everyone from every background must be given an equal opportunity in life.

Authenticity What’s the difference between authenticity and “staged” authenticity (a tourist board version of authenticity to lure tourists seeking a more “real” experience)? How can you tell the difference unless someone tells you? And how do they know anyway?

Psychopaths We live in a world run by psychopaths. Psychopaths are everywhere. In fact, psychopathy is a fundamental part of the human condition. The top five things to look out for if you suspect someone is a fullblown psychopath are: 1) No remorse. Psychopaths never doubt themselves and never feel any guilt about what they do. 2) Nothing is ever the fault of psychopaths. They always blame everyone else, and never themselves. 3) Psychopaths have a great capacity for charm that can be switched on and off. 4) Psychopaths are completely self-focused and never do anything that doesn’t benefit themselves. 5) All psychopaths are game players. They will lie, cheat, manipulate, exploit and set others against each other to advance their own cause. In a dog-eat-dog world, psychopaths have extraordinary advantages over others. They are not hindered by morality. They don’t have any! Ruthless, predatory, amoral and immoral free-market capitalism is a godsend for them. In a fair, rational, moral world, psychopaths would fall to the bottom of society (where they belong). In an irrational, immoral world, there’s nothing to stop them.

Remember, psychopaths never do anything that doesn’t help themselves, and they will step on anyone (even their own mother) to get what they want. They don’t let any obstacles get in their way, least of all moral principles. Psychopaths are callous, unemotional and fearless. They’re con men and shapeshifters who come with multiple masks; a mask for every occasion. A psychopath never reveals his true self – except when he’s about to murder his victim and there are no witnesses. Many celebrities and sports stars are psychopaths. Almost all of the super rich are psychopaths. A psychopath has no respect for others. He will use every advantage to the maximum. All psychopaths are fanatical supporters of inheritance, privilege, cronyism and nepotism. They despise merit because they know they stand no chance in a rational society where all of their tricks will be exposed. The top five psychopathic professions are: 1) Members of Boardrooms (CEOs, CFOs, chairmen, directors) 2) Lawyers 3) The media 4) Salespeople 5) Surgeons The Boardroom psychopaths have trampled over countless people to get to the top. They have no conscience, no remorse, and are perfectly happy to pay themselves enormous amounts of money for firing huge numbers of their employees (they love the godlike power they exercise over people’s fate). They will cheat and lie without compunction. The ends – their personal glory and victory – are all that matter. The means are always justified in their minds. Lawyers are professional liars (sophists) and spin doctors who will do anything to win. In most countries, elected politicians frequently have law degrees. In America, around 40% of the House of Representatives have law degrees, and it’s an astounding 60% in the Senate. The media will say and do anything to advance their careers and deceive the masses. They are always pushing the agenda of the psychopathic ruling elite and justifying their inordinate wealth and power.

Salespeople will do anything to make a sale. Ripping off their customers, cheating and lying to them, come as second nature to them. The sale – not the person – is all that counts. Surgeons are psychopathic because they love the power they hold over life and death. They revel in the status and adulation they receive. With their sharp knives, sharp tongues and mordant humour, surgeons are simply sublimated serial killers. The latter end life with the blade, and the former save it with the blade, but both are using a knife to determine matters of life and death. Boardroom psychopathy is five times greater than the rate of psychopathy in the general population. Corporatocracy is rule by psychopaths. Private banking – the basis of the capitalist economy – is run by psychopaths willing to take extreme risks with other people’s money to enrich themselves. The 2008 financial meltdown that almost destroyed the global economy was the culmination of decades of banking and corporate psychopathy. It certainly wasn’t free-market capitalism (economic psychopathy) that saved the day, but socialist (anti-psychopathy) government bailouts. Unregulated free-market capitalism was the sole cause of the disaster. Yet libertarian psychopaths claim that “crony” capitalism was the real cause and that ultra pure capitalism is the answer. Crony capitalism is of course the inevitable psychopathic outcome of any kind of free-market capitalism. The only way to control capitalism is by bringing the private infrastructure of capitalism under public control. Just as it would be insane to have a private army outside public control (this is the basis of military “Caesarism”), so it’s insane to have a private economy outside public control (economic Caesarism). Our world is ruled by economic Caesars – psychopaths – steadily transferring all of the world’s assets to themselves, and fully supported by all free-market capitalists (enemies of the people!). Psychopaths are extremely attracted to jobs in banks and corporations because that’s where they can make vast amounts of money and get vast amounts of power. Their risk-taking, shallow charisma, ruthlessness, fearlessness and lust for danger make them unstoppable. They thrive in uncertainty and chaos. Because they lack empathy and sympathy, they can focus solely on their own advantage and exploiting the fear and indecision of others. Where others hesitate, they never do, hence they often seem to be great leaders, fully in control. When everyone else panics, they remain icy

calm and in their element. Many medal-winning military heroes are psychopaths. They don’t get scared like ordinary people. In fact, they are stimulated by the horrors of war. Psychopaths are adrenalin junkies and cocaine fiends. They love dangerous sports. Unlike introverts, they have very low levels of cortical arousal, so constantly need external stimulation. People who love Bungee jumping or parachuting out of an aeroplane are on the psychopathic spectrum. Psychopaths are free of phobias and anxieties. Imagine knowing no fear or anxiety. What would you feel like? – God! Manic-depressives in their manic phase become psychopaths. Free-market capitalism is simply unrestrained psychopathy. Free-market capitalists are parasitic predators, better-educated criminals, criminals from affluent rather than poor backgrounds. They’re risk-taking and dangerseeking gamblers. Putting them in charge is like putting vampires in charge of the blood bank. One psychopath said of himself, “I’m a cat in a world of mice. What I’m doing is perfectly normal for a cat.” Psychopaths are content to simulate being mice – until they’re ready to strike for the kill. Serial killing psychopaths are convinced they will never get caught and that they are intellectually superior to their pursuers. All psychopaths believe they are far superior to the herd, and that they should be able to enter the sheep pen for a feast whenever they like.

The Fictional Psychopath James Bond, the elite fictional British secret agent, has been identified as a classic psychopath. He loves killing, compulsively jokes about it (while he’s actually doing it or immediately after he’s done it), shows zero remorse, and is addicted to risk-taking, thrill-seeking and danger. He has no empathy or sympathy, is totally self-absorbed and narcissistic, has superficial charisma that allows him to charm people, especially women, and exhibits “grandiosity”, meaning he thinks himself supremely important and godlike. Like many psychopaths, Bond is greatly loved and admired. Men want to be like him and women want to sleep with him. Such are the power and attraction of the psychopath. Many prophets such as Mohammed were outright psychopaths. Many popes and kings were psychopaths. Great leaders such as Alexander the

Great, Caesar, Genghis Khan, Napoleon, Hitler, Stalin and Mao were psychopaths. King Henry VIII of England, who executed two of his six wives, was a psychopath. Oliver Cromwell, the Puritan Dictator who executed Charles I of England was a psychopath. History is littered with psychopaths. They have been a central feature of the human story. Most politicians, lawyers, accountants, surgeons, architects, generals, bankers, CEOs, media moguls, police chiefs, intelligence chiefs, entrepreneurs, and so on, are on the psychopathic spectrum. They are white collar versions of blue collar serial killers, rapists, muggers, burglars and hitmen. We live in a Mafia world, run by a criminal, psychopathic elite who make the people an offer they can’t refuse.

Cover Ups Why do cover-ups take place? Because of psychopathy. All psychopaths would much rather let the innocent suffer, die and be thrown to the dogs than admit their own failings and culpability. Why are whistle blowers treated so badly? Because their revelations will damage the reputation of the people in charge (psychopaths), who will never permit that to happen. So, they totally discredit and trash the whistleblowers and destroy their careers. Our whole culture – ruled as it is by psychopaths without any morality, who will do anything to succeed – automatically becomes wholly corrupt and resistant to all criticism. All official statistics are lies, simply invented by psychopaths to present a completely false picture of their abilities. Psychopaths can never tell the truth, particularly about themselves. If you put such people in power, never expect any culture of integrity, honour and truth. Always expect the worst.

Institutional Repression “I hate America very deeply. The economic repression of the masses institutionalised.” – Bill Haydon in John Le Carré’s Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy America is arguably much less free than the old Soviet Union. The Soviets weren’t free and knew it. The Americans aren’t free but think they are. The Americans are institutionally deceived by their religious, economic,

political, social and media systems. The most satirical American movie of them all is It’s a Wonderful Life – a Satanic hymn to the prison of smalltown America and why you should never attempt to leave your jail.

The Madness Libertarian Americans believe that in a “free” country, the government should not be allowed to tell anyone to do anything, since that, in their opinion, is contrary to freedom. In other words, these libertarians are anarchists who reject laws and government. A government is of course pointless if it’s unable to pass and enforce any laws. If you accept law, you accept the constraint of your freedom. If you don’t accept law, you’re an anarchist and you’re outside the law, outside society and a self-declared opponent of the State. America is now full of people who, in the name of “freedom”, completely reject the social contract. America has become ungovernable.

Cartman Cartman in South Park is a psychopath. His most famous line – “Respect my authoritah” – is a classic psychopath statement. Psychopaths are obsessed with having religious, social, political, and economic authority over others. Cartman never has any agenda other than himself.

The Freudian Psyche and Psychopathy Our Freudian Id component is our inner Psychopath, and our Freudian Superego is our inner Empath and Sympath. Our Ego mediates between them (obeying the Reality Principle). In public, most people obey the Superego, but will let the Id have its way during “play time”, and in privacy (with other consenting adults). We are all part Dr Jekyll (Superego) and part Mr Hyde (Id = Psychopath). Psychopaths are those who are routinely much more like Mr Hyde than Dr Jekyll. Psychopaths bring their Id right into the public arena and declare themselves “libertarians” – lovers of liberty – by which they mean they reject any laws that restrain their Id compulsions. They want to be free on their terms, not on those of everyone around them. The narrative of “freedom” is of course highly seductive, except there’s no freedom at all in

a world with psychopaths running amok, as they would be in Ayn Rand’s libertarian vision of society. Rand promoted the “Virtue of Selfishness” – a position of absolute psychopathy. The fictional Gordon Gekko stated the psychopathic axiom – “Greed is Good” – and was ecstatically applauded by all anarcho-capitalist libertarians and Randroids. Psychopaths will do anything to be No.1 and free from the rules of society. Psychopaths hate rules, leaders, government and the State. However, if they can’t get rid of them, their next objective is to take over and dominate them. Governments and States are usually run by psychopaths. The “democratic” nations are ruled by free-market capitalist psychopaths who control the economy in their own interests (which is why we get the 1% owning half the world).

Test Yourself For Psychopathy Do you hate all authority? Do you hate being told what to do? Do you resent every cent of tax you have to pay? Do you reject public healthcare and want all healthcare to be based on private insurance? Do you rail against public health measures such as fluoridating water? Do you despise public education and support elitist private education? Do you support inheritance and privilege? Would you do “anything” for your family? Are you obsessed with power, wealth and status? Do you think you are one of the greatest people on Earth and your opinions are always right? Do you believe in the God who ordered Abraham to murder his son? Do you see nothing wrong with that? Do you think the father of a family is always right and should always be obeyed? Will you do anything to win? Do you want to be No.1 at any cost? Will you say and do anything to achieve that goal? Do you feel entitled to all the best things in life? Are you obsessed with yourself? Do you always want your own way? Do you feel superior to others? Does it infuriate you when others disagree with you or contradict you? Are you a libertarian, a fundamentalist Christian, a fundamentalist free-market capitalist? Are you right wing? Are you conservative? Are you “saved”? Are you one of the “elect”? Do you love guns and would never surrender them? Are you a “patriot”? Do you love Ayn Rand? Is Wall Street your favourite film? Do you believe implicitly in the 9/11 conspiracy theory? Do you eagerly talk

about social Darwinism, the “natural order”, the survival of the fittest, about the lion and the wildebeest? Then you’re a psychopath.

Hawks, Doves and Retaliators People who identify with hawks (bird of prey) are psychopaths. People who identify with doves (symbols of peace and love) are the prey of hawks. Retaliators are those who are dovelike when with doves but, unlike doves, will retaliate against hawk aggression. All of the dynamics of the world revolve around hawks, doves and retaliators. Everything has to be done to create a Constitution that identifies psychopaths, prevents them from getting to the top, and ensures that, if they still get through, the law will stop them from doing what they want. The law must be more powerful than any person. All right wingers want there to be no laws at all – a sure sign of psychopathy. All libertarians are naturalborn psychopaths. They are extremely dangerous: hawk predators. They want to revel in hawk capitalism that makes them gods and everyone else their slaves. The master-slave dialectic is the predator-prey dialectic, the psychopathvictim dialectic. Hawks = Masters = Predators = Psychopaths. Doves = Slaves = Prey = Empaths and Sympaths.

Right Wing Psychopaths Free-market capitalism is a psychopathic system, a hawk system, a Freudian Id system devoted to the pleasure principle, self-indulgence and instant gratification, funded by “credit” (i.e. deferred debt). Communism is an Empath and Sympath system, a dove system, a Freudian Superego system devoted to equality. America despises communism because right wing America is essentially psychopathic. American Psycho is an appropriate designation for the whole of the American right wing. The Pope was instantly branded a Marxist for daring to criticize “trickle down” economics. President Obama is regularly labelled a Marxist. Anyone who says one word against American capitalism is

instantly dismissed as a communist. American psychopaths will simply never listen to one word of rebuke. Ayn Rand’s infamous book Atlas Shrugged is about pure psychopathy and a right wing coup by the super rich, led by John Galt (an unquestionable fictional psychopath.) Atlas Shrugged is the story of elite psychopaths going on strike and exhibiting pathological hatred towards a non-psychopathic left wing government seeking to promote the general good, despite the elitist saboteurs and psychopaths in their midst. Rand herself was a psychopath, and addicted to extremely strong sadomasochistic sex. She dreamt of being raped by a strong, dominant man – a supreme psychopath such as John Galt, her fictional ideal man. Anarchists are psychopaths because they want all rules to be abolished. They reject government, the State, laws, leaders – anything that gets in the way of their personal psychopathy and compulsive need to do whatever they want, regardless of others. The whole libertarian movement is psychopathic. The Confederacy fought against the “tyranny” of the Federal Government in order to uphold their “freedom” to enslave millions of Africans. If that’s not psychopathy, what is? All libertarians are obsessed with their own liberty, but not that of anyone else. They are perfectly happy to enslave others or treat them like scum. They claim that their freedom is being restricted if they are not allowed to do so. Most conspiracy theorists are psychopaths. They have a psychopathic hatred of government and the State and are willing to tell any amount of lies to overthrow the government and State to serve their own anarchist and libertarian agenda. Many conspiracy theorists, anarchists and libertarians were abused, bullied or neglected as children hence are paranoid and resentful towards “authority” (a proxy for their parents). They are displacing their anger towards their parents to the government and State.

Psychopathic Religions Judaism: Jehovah = Psychopath; Moses = psychopathic prophet. Judaism is a Hawk religion (the Jews call themselves the “Chosen People”). The Jews are the

slaves of their cosmic Master (Jehovah), but feel empowered by this “alliance”. Islam: Allah = Psychopath; Mohammed = psychopathic prophet. Islam is a hawk religion (the Muslims believe they are the Faithful and True servants of God and that everyone else is evil and damned); Muslims “submit” unconditionally to Allah and Mohammed, but feel enormously empowered by this self-subjugation. Christianity: This religion masquerades as a dovelike religion (it pretends to promote peace, love, compassion and forgiveness), yet Christianity is allied with the supreme psychopathic religion of Judaism, which is based on fathers being expected to murder their own children if “God” (the ultimate serial killing Psychopath) commands it. Jesus Christ’s condemnation of the rich logically leads to economic communism and yet almost all Christians are rapacious capitalists. Hinduism: Hinduism operates the Caste System, a truly psychopathic system. The top caste are the masters, the bottom caste their slaves. The top caste are the predators that prey on the bottom caste, the hawks that feed on the doves.

The God Complex Psychopaths suffer from a God complex. They think they are God and, crucially, that being God means being worshipped by others rather than being part of a Community of Gods and Society of the Divine. The ultimate psychopath with a God complex is Satan: he who thinks he’s the True God. He says, “It’s all about me. I’m all powerful. I have the power of life and death in my hands. I take life and I give life. Look on my works ye mighty and despair. Bow before your Lord and God. Worship me.” We live in a psychopathic world, ruled by a psychopathic economic system (free-market capitalism), and psychopathic religions (Abrahamism and Karmism). We need to live in a Retaliator world that specifically takes on the hawk psychopaths and beats them.

Psychopaths always get to the top unless they are identified and stopped (by retaliators). Psychopaths always promote the private over the public good, the individual over the collective, “liberty” over rules, the family over society. They are always right wing even if, like Stalin, they disingenuously call themselves communist or left wing. Stalin’s only interest in communism was that it allowed him centralised control of everything, like a medieval monarch. Stalinist Russia had nothing to do with true communism and was all about totalitarian control of the people. Most conspiracy theorists are psychopaths. They believe in a ridiculous theory such as 9/11 because they themselves see a black flag inside job as perfectly rational and understandable, i.e. they are projecting their own psychopathy onto the world. Osama bin Laden was a psychopath – so were the 9/11 maniacs who perpetrated the attack. They had been subjected to the brainwashing of the ultimate psychopathic conditioning system: Islam. The American government of 9/11 was of course full of psychopaths too, but such psychopaths are all about “getting away with it”, with not getting caught, with maintaining their power and control. 9/11 as an inside job would be mad since the cost-benefit analysis would reveal a huge potential cost – being caught and executed for high treason – against a tiny or non-existent benefit. These guys already had enormous wealth and power. Why risk that to get a marginal amount more? Risk-taking is one thing. Being insane is quite another.

The Psychopathic World The history of the world is the history of the psychopath. The Abrahamic “God” is the most psychopathic of all, concerned with pure power and domination. Humanity cannot advance until it eradicates Abrahamism, Karmism and free-market capitalism. “Becoming God” means joining a Community of Gods and Society of the Divine, not becoming a God worshipped by others. Such a God is a False God, a Demiurge, a Devil. Anyone who refers to “the Creator”, to “God Almighty” is a worshipper of psychopaths. All monarchists are worshippers of psychopaths Anyone who wants a fuehrer or dictator is a worshipper of psychopaths.

If a Nazi officer ordered a Jew called Abraham to kill his son, it would be regarded as a war atrocity and crime against humanity. When Jehovah ordered Abraham to kill his son, Abraham got on his knees and worshipped him. That’s the Jews for you. Psychopaths!

The War of the Dominants Dominant Extraverts (Psychopaths; Hawks) versus Dominant Introverts (Rationalists; Retaliators).

Caesarism When Caesar crossed the Rubicon, he brought his private army into the Roman State, contrary to the wishes of the Roman government. This is the wet dream of all anarcho-capitalist libertarians. They fantasise about bringing their private army to Washington D.C. Caesar was a psychopath, obsessed with ruling Rome and getting his own way. All anarcho-capitalist libertarians are exactly the same. In the past, our world was ruled by Caesars with private armies. Today, armies belong to the nation rather than individual generals, but the economy doesn’t. Now we have economic Caesars – global capitalists who can do whatever they like with their private corporations (like private armies). They owe no loyalty to any State.

***** Governments have no control over anything. If a powerful capitalist corporation decides to transfer a million jobs from America to China, the American government has no say over this. If this were a private army, this act would constitute high treason. But it’s a private corporation, so no one says a word. No one is tried for treason. If Google or Microsoft invented some brilliant new automation procedure that earned a fortune for Google or Microsoft and its shareholders, but put millions of Americans out of a job, the American government could not breathe one word of criticism. In free-market capitalism, the government has zero control. It’s entirely a hostage of corporatocracy. The biggest lie of modern times is that governments are in charge. The truth is that they have zero power. Corporations and banks dictate everything. A democratic capitalist government is held hostage by

globalist corporations. When a country has no say over its destiny, when its people are powerless to control their own future, then that means the nation is under the rule of psychopaths. The first requirement of “people power” is that the people should be responsible for their own fate, not banks or corporations or globalism. Free-market capitalism is inherently a contradiction of democracy. No voter has any say at all over the corporations and banks that run the world. You cannot be both a free-market capitalist and a democrat. You cannot be both a free-market capitalist and a meritocrat. Either unelected, unaccountable corporations and banks (Wall Street) are in charge, or the people (Main Street) are in charge. What’s it to be? For the people to be free, corporatocracy – free-market capitalism and private banking – must fall. Your choice. Will you vote for the end of freemarket capitalism and corporatocracy? If you don’t, you have agreed to be ruled by psychopaths over whom you have no control whatsoever. Your future is entirely in their hands, but they are unelected by you and unaccountable to you. If you go along with that, you are the biggest sucker and slave of all time. If you surrender your control over your own fate, you deserve to be a slave. You have chosen that fate for yourself. No one made you put corporations and banks in charge of your life. That was your choice. Shut your face about government and the State if you have voluntarily chosen to be ruled by banks and corporations.

America Historically, America is a nation of psychopathic immigrants – religious maniacs with fanatical religious beliefs who were either expelled by their home countries or fled in order to be able to spread their poison without any interference from government and the State. America is a still an overwhelmingly Christian county. Christianity is of course a psychopathic religion. If it were remotely logical, it would promote communism. Instead, America has made Christianity and free-market capitalism go hand in hand. Free-market capitalism is an economic system designed by and for psychopaths, with zero consideration for others. All capitalists worship Mammon, god of profit at any price. Psychopaths are those who cannot control their Id. They believe they have infinite rights, but they do not believe that others should have any

rights at all if they conflict with their right to do whatever they goddamn please.

The Illuminati CIA Department Many 9/11 psychopathic conspiracy theorists conclude that because we reject their theory as absurd, we are ipso facto on the side of the government and part of the conspiracy. That’s their “logic”. Well, of course, we are wholly opposed to all capitalist democratic governments and regard them as psychopathic too and the pawns of the deranged rich elite – the 1% (the anarcho-capitalist libertarians and advocates of Ayn Rand). We support the meritocratic Platonic Republic that obeys Rousseau’s General Will, Kant’s Categorical Imperative, the Hegelian dialectic and Leibnizian rationalism. We don’t support any governments that defend privilege, nepotism, cronyism, predatory capitalism, inheritance, casino banking, private control of the banking system, corporatocracy and the rule of the 1% (the super rich capitalists).

Heroes? Heroes such as James Bond have a Superego Cause but use Id methods. Many “heroes” are Id fantasy figures and Superego nightmares. Most video games, especially the shoot ‘em up genre, are psychopathic games, designed for Id fantasies. Superego video games are in very short supply and in severely limited demand.

The Reptilian Psychopath The Psychopathic Id corresponds to the reptilian part of the brain. It’s the Satanic component of a person. As for the Ego and the anti-Psychopathic Superego, two different schemes are possible: A) Superego = Limbic System: promotes emotional accord and empathy and sympathy between people. It’s all about “love and light”. It’s the Luciferian part of people. B) Ego = Neocortex: rational thinking aspect that obeys the Reality Principle. It’s the Abraxian part of people.

Or A) Superego = Neocortex: rational thinking aspect that obeys the Reality Principle and rational Kantian Categorical Imperative. B) The Ego corresponds to the emotional limbic system and sits between the reptilian brain and the neocortex. It has its own judging system and obeys the reality principle. In private, it normally supports the reptilian brain and in public it normally supports the neocortex. With psychopaths, the Ego always sides with the Id and the Superego is ignored. Following the first scheme, there are three types of opinions: Id opinions (Psychopathic; Satanic), Superego Ego opinions (emotional; Luciferian) and Ego opinions (rationalist; Abraxian). There’s absolutely no point in attempting to engage in debate with people holding Id opinions. That’s the definition of futility. Abrahamists, Karmists, free-market capitalists, “patriots”, Randroids, libertarians, anarcho-capitalists, members of the Republican Party or Tea Party, anyone who opposes 100% inheritance tax, 9/11 conspiracy theorists – all of these people are reptilian, Satanic, fanatical psychopaths who will never change their opinions under any circumstances. They denounce us when we declare that we are not a debating society. Well, a rational debate can only take place at the Superego or Ego level and never at the psychopathic level of the reptilian brain and Id. It’s well known that right wingers are much more stupid than left wingers. Right wingers are heavy users of their psychopathic, reptilian, Id brain. They never say anything rational. Their stance is always that of pure, unadulterated self-interest. They hate government and the State which dare to attempt to tame the Id: the Satanic, psychopathic, reptilian brain. What is “libertarianism”? It’s the primeval scream of rage of the reptilian brain. It despises everything to do with the Superego that strives to rein it in and control it. Civilisation and society are possible thanks only to the Superego. They are always under threat from the Id. You cannot reason with crocodiles, sharks or American right wingers. That’s a simple fact. They are the absolute enemies of true freedom. The only freedom they care about is their own. Not yours. Every part of the 9/11 conspiracy theory has been totally debunked, and yet still all of the right wingers peddle the same old nonsense, and refer to legions of “experts” who agree with them. Oddly enough, they never refer

to the much vaster legions of genuine experts who disagree with them (or they are conveniently dismissed as part of the conspiracy). That’s classic psychopathy of course: never listen to the opposition; promote your own message at any cost. Always deny that you have been refuted. Have you ever heard of a Christian Fundamentalist accepting that science has disproven the Bible? 9/11 Conspiracy theorists are exactly the same. They have already reached their conclusion before the debate begins. You are simply required to unconditionally surrender to them. All rational people know better than to waste their time talking to psychopaths.

David Icke David Icke insanely claims that alien reptilians (the “Illuminati”) are running the world. In fact, human reptilians (psychopaths ruled by their reptilian brainstem) are running the world. David Icke himself is a psychopath. He lies relentlessly to his millions of credulous, superstitious, gullible, irrational fans. None of them benefit from Icke’s theories. One person, however, does fantastically well from those theories – David Icke himself! The whole point of these theories is to enrich David Icke and give him power and status. Icke is a modern-day Mohammed. Mohammed spoke of hidden, shapeshifting, pan-dimensional jinn (genies), led by Shaitan, intent on corrupting humanity. If you believe in alien reptilians, why don’t you believe in jinn? They’re the same concept. Of course, Icke’s moronic supporters don’t know anything about Islam. They think Icke has new ideas. Not a single thing he has ever said has not been plagiarised from other sources. When conspiracy theorists attempt to engage in a “debate” with us, they always refer to 9/11. Not one has ever mentioned ontological mathematics even though the whole of Illuminism is predicated on ontological mathematics. 9/11 is Mythos and ontological mathematics is Logos, and all conspiracy theorists stay as far clear of Logos as they possibly can. To all conspiracy theorists, we say this: If you claim you know the truth of this world then you should have no difficulty refuting the ontological mathematics of the Illuminati. So, go on then – read the God Series and attempt to show how ontological mathematics is wrong and your whacky Mythos theories are right. Good luck with that!

*****

Humanity is not run by invisible alien lizards. It’s run by visible super rich capitalist psychopaths. Tragically, most of those who claim to be against shapeshifting reptilians are very much for super rich capitalists, which is why it’s so hard to get rid of these monsters. Until all of the enemies of the 1% agree that free-market capitalism is the source of the 1%’s power, we can never make any progress. The task of the elite and their puppets – such as Icke, Jones, Makow and Fulford – is to divide and rule, to sow confusion, to deflect criticism away from freemarket capitalism. Thus we are subjected to the ludicrous claim that capitalism isn’t capitalist enough, and if only we could get rid of “crony” capitalism and all government and State restraints on capitalism, everything would be wonderful. When it comes to this popular right wing narrative, cui bono? – the super rich psychopaths. There’s nothing the elite would love more than to dispense with government and the State entirely and rule by markets alone. Who are the markets? They are!!! Free-market capitalism is the dictatorship of super rich psychopaths. If you haven’t worked that out yet, you really are dumb.

Observation Look around you. Can you identify the hawks, the doves and the retaliators? Can you see the human sharks and crocodiles in your midst? People make the catastrophic mistake of imagining that most people are like them. They’re not. The only ones who are like you are those who share your personality type, or other personality types closely related to yours. For example, INTJ, INTP, INFJ and INFP types should all get along well. Other personality types might as well be aliens from other planets. They are fundamentally different from you. They think in completely different ways. You have nothing in common with them. You have zero empathy with them. You could never place yourself in their shoes, and vice versa. Psychopaths are the worst of all. They see all other human beings as means to an end rather than ends in themselves. Look at how the world is run. Is it run for everyone? Or for the benefit of the self-obsessed, psychopathic elite?

Enforcement People claim that we could never enforce 100% inheritance tax. Well, tell that to the French Revolutionaries. Where there’s the will, anything is

possible. Humanity’s future is very simple. It must destroy the psychopaths – the elite 1%. Then all the rest of us will be free. From now on, we must have Retaliator governments and States that enforce the General Will. Never again will we have Hawk governments, States, and economic and religious systems that serve the interests only of psychopaths.

Con Men Psychopaths have no emotions. They are like walking sharks or crocodiles. Given that their brains are entirely given over to their own advantage, they are superb at “reading” people, at gauging what makes them tick, what their primary motivators and fears are. A psychopath can press all of your buttons. All conmen are psychopaths. They are brilliant at deceiving people and care nothing for their victims. To understand someone, there are only a few things you need to be aware of: 1) Their family background. 2) Their social background. 3) Their profession, where they live, their status, what clothes they wear. 4) Whether they are motivated by love, money, sex, friendship or status. 5) Their appearance. If you listen to anyone for a sufficient time, they will reveal who they are to you and what defines them. With that knowledge, if you’re a con man, you can tell them exactly what they want to hear as you relentlessly manipulate them to do exactly what you want.

Violent Psychopaths “Opinions founded on prejudice are always sustained with the greatest of violence.” – Francis Jeffrey It’s no surprise that American right wingers are extremely heavily armed. Psychopaths never like to be far from a gun. Abrahamism = contagious psychopathy. Lynch mobs are always led by psychopaths. The Muslim mob is psychopathy in action.

The Great War We are in a great war between Enlightenment (rationalism) and Endarkenment (psychopathy), between the left and right wings, between the forces of the Superego and the Id, between humanity’s divine nature and its bestial nature, between God and Satan. Humanity cannot advance to a divine future – to paradise on earth for all – unless governments and States devote all of their efforts to this end. It’s the greatest positive liberty undertaking in history. All negative libertarians who despise government and the State, all anarchists who hate rules, laws and leaders, all free-market capitalists who revel in consumerism and the profit principle, all Abrahamists and Karmists – they are the unpardonable enemies of human progress. If they resist and obstruct the Dialectic then the Dialectic will simply crush them. The stupid can never beat the smart. The beasts can never beat the Gods. One way or another – peacefully or violently – the New World Order will come into being. It’s humanity’s divine destiny. You have a very straightforward choice – get with the program, or become irrelevant. In which case you will join the dinosaurs. It’s not wealth that will dictate the human future, and it’s not “goodness”. It’s intelligence alone. If all of the world’s rational people get together then, even if they form only ten percent of humanity, they will still possess an overwhelming, crushing advantage. The ninety percent could no more beat them than chimpanzees could defeat humans. Hitherto, the rich have bought the intelligent and given them a nice life in exchange for their intellectual brilliance. But why should the smart do the bidding of the rich? Why don’t they do their own bidding? When they do, everything in this world will change. Then the Second Enlightenment will happen, and humanity will evolve into its divine phase. It’s time for the smart to act. To make history. To save the human race. From the psychopaths who have run the world so far.

Evolution Evolution means a switch from man’s bestial nature to his divine nature – from the reptilian brain to the neocortex. The psychopaths are the defenders of the human beast. They must be overcome to release the human god.

Which side are you on? Are you a Satan or a God? Do you belong to the past or the future? Are you illuminated or not? We are the Illuminati. We are the Plan. We are the future. Our enemies are the dead past. If you’re not illuminated, you’re in the process of becoming extinct. No one needs you. You have nothing to contribute to humanity’s future.

The Archons Gnosticism asserts that the world is under the control of the Demiurge and his archons (the Devil and his demons). We live in hell. What could be worse than being ruled by psychopaths who will do anything to serve their own agenda? All right wingers are Satanic. All conservatives, all those who support the dynastic family, inheritance, nepotism, privilege, cronyism and “libertarianism” are psychopaths. You are psychopathic if you are opposed to the rational, meritocratic State. Reason alone is the solution to humanity’s ills. Reason is the antidote to psychopathy.

The Power War History has involved a great power struggle between three groups: the religious elite (priest caste), the rich elite and the intellectual elite. Originally, the rich elite were kings, nobles, warlords and dictators – an essentially military elite who made themselves rich through brutal conquest and looting. Historically, the intellectuals joined the priest caste or served as advisers to the rich elite. As time went by, the military rich elite were replaced by the business and banking rich elite, and most intellectuals then began to serve this new financial elite. At all times, either the priest caste (popes or theocrats) or the rich elite have ruled (originally as kings and emperors but now as CEOs). The intellectual elite have never ruled. Plato’s Republic was intended to rectify this, but was never implemented. The religious and rich elite both made sure it never happened. Humanity’s future will be all about the intelligentsia taking over the running of the world, as Plato intended. The Star Trek vision of the future is a strongly Platonic vision. The smart people are in charge and the other two elites have been destroyed. There’s no mainstream religion (thus eliminating the priest caste) and money has been abolished (thus eliminating the rich elite). The intellectuals no longer have any rivals.

All intelligent, rational people should be working for precisely this end. We must eradicate the religious and rich elites. They are the greatest brake on human evolution to divinity. They are the ones preventing the building of paradise on earth.

***** All theocracies end in disaster. Religious rule makes nations poor and backward – just look at Islam, Orthodox Judaism and Christian Fundamentalism. Religious nations are highly conservative and traditional. They hate change and they resist science, philosophy and mathematics, since these will all cause people to doubt mainstream religion (Mythos). All countries ruled by the rich never become paradises for all. They are wonderful for the rich elite themselves, but not for anyone else. The point of rule by the rich is to keep the rich rich and everyone else poor. The rich have no interest in spreading or diluting their riches. The rich could never create paradise on earth or a Star Trek future since they simply don’t believe in or want a smart human race of equal opportunities and anti-privilege. The priests and the rich must be abolished for everyone else to be free. This was one of the primary messages of Plato.

Fallacies “Good company” fallacy: the belief that your opinions are truer if you keep “good company” (i.e. if you side with people of high repute and recognised ability). This is a version of the Appeal to Authority. “Bad company” fallacy: the belief that your opinions are less true if you keep “bad company” (i.e. you side with people of low repute and questionable competence).

Givers and Takers Takers (people who are net takers from others) are happier than givers (people who are net givers to others). However givers consider their lives more meaningful, hence more satisfying. What do you want – a happy, meaningless life, or a demanding, meaningful life?

The War Against Truth

When Harry Browne said that during any war truth is forsaken for propaganda, he was committing a radical error, namely that there is any such thing as peace. We are always at war. The world is engaged in perpetual war between different ideologies, religions, political systems, social systems, psychological types, classes, elites, and so on. And all of them are deploying propaganda at all times. Hence when is “truth” ever on the table? Browne’s statement is itself a form of propaganda. We are always trapped in the propaganda web. There’s no escape – except mathematics. No one can lie about math.

Christianity Prior to the Nicene Creed of 325 CE, there was no “orthodox” Christianity. Christians believed all sorts of things. Many Christians did not regard Jesus Christ as God but as the Son of God, the first Creation of God, a super angel, an Aeon, an emanation of God or the Messiah, but not as God himself. Today, there are countless Protestant sects all believing in different things. Outside the Catholic Church, Christianity has once again degenerated into being all things to all men. A Protestant wrote to us to ask us why we spent time demolishing the Nicene Creed when most Christians had never heard of it. Er, the Nicene Creed is the entire theological basis of Christianity! Frankly, Christians don’t know what they believe. They’re far too stupid.

Forces Market forces (blue flag; private; individualistic; anti-social; the particular will) versus Government forces (red flag; public; collective; social; the General Will). Shall we be ruled by markets or governments (proper governments that are not the puppets of markets and private elites)?

***** No market forces and no government forces = libertarianism and anarchy (black flag). Anarchy always creates a power vacuum that’s inevitably filled with violence, leading to tyranny and gangsterism.

Electric Soup

“‘Electric Soup’ is originally the colloquial name for the beverage made by infusing milk with natural gas which was readily available from broken gas lanterns in the hallways and closes of tenements and flats across Scotland before North Sea gas was used and electric lamps were introduced. ‘Electric Soup’ was commonly made and consumed by tramps, alcoholics and delinquents and was reported to have a mind altering effect. Brain damage strong lager, as consumed by park drinkers.” – http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Electric%20Soup “I never made it to a radio station we were due at because some lads on the train had recommended a bar underneath a flyover. It was somewhere they said did great electric soup. That was basically the slops of alcohol all mixed together in a big barrel and that was how it was.” – Johnny Rotten

The Musical Monoculture The music scene is extremely diverse: rock, pop, punk, New Romantic, New Wave, soul, garage, house, blues, hip hop, R&B, jazz, electronic, rave, rap, metal, Goth, EMO, classical, experimental, and so on. These are all variations on the common theme of music and produce a wonderful monoculture with superb diversity and variety: something for everyone. All of these musical genres can co-exist without any difficulty. Now imagine that a group of fanatics came along called “Music is Satanic”, and wanted to ban all music and kill anyone who played or listened to it. Would you eagerly establish a “multicultural society” to accommodate these extremists (in the name of free speech, tolerance, cultural sensitivity, respect for others, political correctness and so on)? Or would you ban these nutcases who oppose everything your musical monoculture stands for? No good ever comes from multiculturalism. It’s the source of nothing but conflict. People have no right to hold fanatical beliefs that are intimidating and insulting to others (and backed up by a long, welldocumented history of torture, inquisition and persecution), and that threaten all “infidels” with punishment and hell.

The Pilgrim Economy In medieval Catholic Europe, it has been estimated that one fifth of the population were, at any one time, either on pilgrimage or servicing the

pilgrimage industry. It was a vital part of the European economy. An economy doesn’t have to be based on consumerism. It can be based on anything at all. We would be living in a far healthier, more spiritual, ecofriendly and communitarian world if we resurrected the pilgrimage industry, or, rather, some pagan equivalent. Who killed off the pilgrimage industry? – the Protestants, the arch capitalists and consumerists.

Social Capitalism Social capitalism is a synthesis of socialism and capitalism – not a radically new theory of economics. Social capitalism has simple objectives. The key ideas are: 1) Public rather than private control of the economic infrastructure. 2) Private, small-scale capitalism operating within this public infrastructure. 3) Small-scale capitalism rather than large-scale corporatocracy. 4) Elite education for all. Everyone to be an expert in their chosen area. 5) Everyone to do “work” (what they love) rather than a “job” (what pays the bills). 6) The economy to be run like the military, i.e. under the control of the State (people), with accountable, meritocratic, public officials in charge who can be fired without compensation for poor performance. 7) 100% inheritance tax. No permanent, dynastic ownership of assets. 8) The end of the 1% economically dominating and controlling the 99%. 9) The end of all inheritance, privilege, nepotism, cronyism and corruption. 10) Absolute equal opportunities for all. The central idea of social capitalism is to preserve what’s good about capitalism: choice, markets, entrepreneurism, incentives for hard work and good ideas; and to end what’s bad about capitalism: enormous disparities in wealth, private elites controlling politics and serving their own agendas, corporatocracy, globalism, inheritance, privilege, nepotism, cronyism, corruption and unequal opportunities, the 1% versus the 99%.

Social capitalism takes the banking system and stock market under State control – like conventional socialism – but then, like conventional capitalism, operates according to competition, entrepreneurism and markets. Just as capitalist bank managers fund promising businesses, so will socialist bank managers. But there will be no predatory capitalism and casino banking; only productive banking for the social good. The whole system is underpinned by 100% inheritance tax. Everything in the end comes back to the State and the People (the Commonwealth), but bright, hard-working, talented people will certainly enjoy the fruits of their labour while they are alive. There will be no communist idea of equal pay for everyone regardless of effort and skill. What we envisage is the end of the employer-employee (master-slave) dialectic and the birth of partnerships. Every business will be a cooperative, a partnership, and each business will agree amongst itself how much it can afford to pay everyone (all the partners). We want the world to be full of highly qualified people doing work they love with others who love that work too, and to bring to an end all menial, soul-destroying “mortgage” jobs that people take just to pay the bills. The whole system is predicated on having an expert workforce of people who won’t take any shit from bullying, greedy bosses and will want to be their own bosses (in partnership groups). This elite workforce will be produced by the new education system that will ensure that everyone gets the 10,000 hours of training required to make them an expert in their chosen field. Imagine in 2008 that no bailouts had happened. The whole of the capitalist banking system would have become insolvent and gone out of business. All investors/shareholders would have lost 100%. Right wing capitalist governments would have fallen and been replaced by left wing socialist governments. Governments would have assumed total control of the banking system and made it a public (State) enterprise rather than private (capitalist). Governments would have appointed experts to run the banking system and it would then have operated much as before except the people in charge would now be public officials, there would be no private shareholders, and no casino speculation. The purpose of banks in social capitalism is to invest in small capitalist businesses that will prosper or perish according to the public, market response to their goods and services. Any enterprise that gets too big is

broken up. Social capitalism is all about the public, not corporate good. It’s about “small-scale” capitalism within a socialist (State/people owned and managed) economic infrastructure. If communism is total public control of the economy and capitalism total private control of the economy, social capitalism is the total public control of the infrastructure of capitalism. The sole economic question is whether the private controllers of capitalism can be completely replaced by public controllers. Social capitalism – the dialectical replacement of free-market capitalism – resolves all of the problems facing the world today.

***** The following five graphic books are short and effective introductions to economics: 1) Capitalism: A Graphic Guide by Dan Cryan, Sharron Shatil and Piero. 2) Introducing Economics: A Graphic Guide by David Orrell and Borin Van Loon. 3) Economists for Beginners by Bernard Canavan. 4) Marx’s “Capital” for Beginners by David Smith and Phil Evans. 5) Introducing Marxism by Rupert Woodfin and Oscar Zarate. More detailed books: Small Is Beautiful: A Study of Economics As If People Mattered by E.F. Shumacher The Spirit Level: Why Equality is Better for Everyone by Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett Treasure Islands: Tax Havens and the Men who Stole the World by Nicholas Shaxson

The Pope

“While the earnings of the minority are growing exponentially, so, too, is the gap separating the majority from the prosperity enjoyed by those happy few. The imbalance is the result of ideologies which defend the absolute autonomy of the marketplace and financial speculation… A new tyranny is thus born, invisible and often virtual, which relentlessly imposes its own laws and rules… The thirst for power and possessions knows no limits. In this system, which tends to devour everything that stands in the way of increased profits, whatever is fragile, like the environment, is defenceless before the interests of a deified market, which become the only rule. ... Behind this attitude lurks a rejection of Ethics and a rejection of God. Ethics has come to be viewed with a certain scornful derision. It is seen as counterproductive, too human, because it makes money and power relative. It is felt to be a threat, since it threatens the manipulation and debasement of the person. In effect, Ethics leads to a God who calls for a committed response which is outside the categories of the marketplace. ... Money must serve, not rule!” – Pope Francis Why doesn’t Pope Francis abandon rhetoric and, using his supposed status as the “vicar of Christ”, declare free-market capitalism evil and Satanic, and then pronounce the excommunication of all free-market capitalists? Well, they’ll be throwing snowballs in hell before the Pope has the guts to take real, formal Catholic action against capitalists and the rich. Like so many others, he talks the talk but never walks the walk. That’s why the world needs people like Robespierre and Saint-Just. They practised exactly what they preached. The Pope knows perfectly well that Catholicism would be finished if it ever genuinely challenged the might of free-market capitalism. This means that Catholicism refuses to fight Mammon, the true God of this world. If Catholicism refuses to attack the evil in its midst, what’s the point of Catholicism? How can it call itself the City of God when it sits in the midst of the City of Satan and does nothing? The Catholic Church is in alliance with the Antichrist, hence must be eradicated.

The Forces of Darkness AC: “100% Inheritance tax? So now we should steal people’s money and give it all to the government, and that will stop corruption? Geez, why didn’t someone think of that yet? Lol.”

Inheritance tax applies, by definition, to dead people. How can you steal from the dead? The dead have no rights and own nothing. As Thomas Jefferson said, “The earth belongs to the living, not to the dead.” Why should the people related to the dead collect the ownerless former assets of the dead? By what right, other than that of parasitism, do they lay claim to these assets? If anything, inheritance is stealing from the dead by the family scroungers and dead heads who are unable to earn their own living in life. Yeah, allowing the children of the wealthy to inherit their parents’ wealth has certainly made the world a corruption-free zone. Lol! No wonder the thieves are on the side of private wealth. They thought up their system long ago and brainwashed the sucker masses (like AC) into accepting it hook, line and sinker. 100% inheritance tax is the infallible antidote. No inheritance tax money goes into the pockets of the members of government. It goes to the Commonwealth, to be invested in the people. It must be precisely accounted for by meritocratic officials who are publicly elected and fully accountable to the people. Bye, bye AC, and all your fellow parasites who want to steal from the people (the Commonwealth) and give the stolen booty to the rich elites (the 1%). Jefferson said, “That government is the strongest of which every man feels himself a part.” Hence the government must reflect the General Will and Commonwealth, not the power, wealth and the particular wills of dynastic elites. The war between the Commonwealth and private wealth is the war between good and evil, between reason and unreason, between enlightenment and endarkenment, between equal opportunities and privilege, between community and the family, between the left wing and the right wing, between the future and the past.

The Ownership Fallacy The right wing subscribe to the fallacy that “ownership” is permanent rather than only as long the life of the owner. In fact, a dead person doesn’t own anything and has no legal rights and indeed no rights at all. Death cancels all rights, all contracts, all obligations, all property, all debts and all credits. The question is: “Should the ownerless assets left behind by the dead pass to the control of private wealth or the Commonwealth?” Right wingers

say the former and left wingers the latter. The former leads to exactly the world of inheritance, privilege, nepotism, cronyism, anti-meritocracy, and rule by the dynastic families and privileged elites (the 1%) that we all endure today. For the 99% to be triumphant, private inheritance must end. All financial inheritance must be public. i.e. the assets of the dead are owned by the Commonwealth not by the relatives (nepotism) and friends (cronyism) of the dead. Only by smashing private inheritance – the absurd notion of ownership being permanent and tied to “blood” (family) – can we have a meritocratic world of equal opportunities. The right wing – the supporters of private wealth, privilege, negative liberty, the particular will and the family will always irrationally and malevolently oppose us. Such is the dialectical struggle. But they are dinosaurs who have had their day. We are the future. We are the Plan. We are the truth and the light.

The Singular Truth TS: “To know the truth you must see both sides to truly grasp an understanding of all there is to know about something. You must know all there is to know about it, good and bad ... there are no secrets with total truth!” Go on then, TS, provide “both” sides to 1 + 1 = 2. The reality is that the truth has only one answer. With Mythos, there are at least two sides to every story. But Logos isn’t Mythos. There is only one truth. The principle of sufficient reason does not allow any ambiguity, opinion, belief or interpretation. People such as TS simply reveal their total ignorance of the truth – mathematics – by perpetuating the fallacy that all religions reflect the same core truth. In fact, Abrahamism contains zero truth content. Even within Abrahamism, Judaism, Christianity and Islam completely contradict each other. And Abrahamism has nothing at all in common with Eastern religion. Only those who have absolute contempt for the truth and for clear, rational, logical thinking could imagine there is any common core to all religions. Only one religion is true – Illuminism = ontological mathematics. To claim that anything else is true is to assert that a non-mathematical system involving “truths” of faith is the equivalent of a system reflecting the eternal truths of reason. Any such claim is insane. Sadly, all too many

people are like TS and believe mad things. We live in a world where barely 10% of people are rational and capable of logical thinking. A cursory inspection of TS’s Facebook page reveals her to be a credulous, superstitious, New Age fool obsessed with fantasy stories. It’s no wonder she doesn’t understand Illuminism. It’s always offensive for a rationalist to be subjected to the irrational drivel of people who manifestly have no Logos skills at all. People such as TS imagine that their fantastical Mythos beliefs constitute truth. They don’t. They are 100% false. That’s a fact.

The Old Lie “A message to those humans who don’t know how to make Peace on Earth, try not to make disputes, stop spreading fear and do not stir tensions. ... Those who try to make war should leave planet Earth.” – An anarchist That’s fighting talk! Why don’t all the pacifists leave the Earth and let the good people – the retaliators – resist and fight the evil powers that rule this world? The last thing this world needs is people spouting the Christian garbage of Turn the Other Cheek and Love thy Enemy. Have anarchists learned nothing at all about human nature?

The Xmas Lie Christians are told it’s a sin to lie. At Christmas, all parents officially lie to their children about Santa Claus. Christianity obviously starts as it means to go on: as systematic lying and fantasy for exploiting infantile minds.

How to Destroy Christmas You could destroy Christmas by replacing every reference to “Christmas” with the phrase “Rip Off”. Merry Rip Off!

Capitalism: Spend More, Save More “The more you spend, the more you save.” – Anonymous If you spend a fortune, you’ll save a fortune. Not!!!

The Public Space Hawks believe that they have every right to bring their personal tastes and beliefs into the public space and inflict them on those who don’t want them. They will call you a fascist if you attempt to stop them. Doves shrug their shoulders and, in the name of “tolerance”, do nothing about the hawks and their unacceptable behaviour. Retaliators always fight back, but are regarded as “troublemakers”. The hawks say, “You have no right to tell me what to do. You have no right to dictate to me. You have no right to impose your standards on me. It’s a free world.” Of course, they would be first to object if you were being Hawkish to them and using exactly their logic to inflict on them things they didn’t like. Hawks are always negative libertarians. They are great advocates of being free to do whatever they like, but objecting to others being free to do what they like too. They are total hypocrites and totally irrational. They have absolute contempt for the Kantian Categorical Imperative: “Act as if the maxim from which you act were to become through your will a general law.” Kant had the precise opposite stance to that of Ayn Rand. Where she trumpeted the “virtue of selfishness”, Kant said that no action performed from self-interest could ever be virtuous. The Categorical Imperative goes hand in hand with Rousseau’s General Will and is a defining element of positive liberty. It requires people to act fairly and rationally, not to demand that they should be able to do whatever they like regardless of others (which is what negative libertarians seek). If you bring a huge snarling, shitting, slobbering, barking dog into the public space, you cannot object when someone else brings a huge boogie box into the public space and blasts it 24/7 outside your front door. You’re as bad as each other. The public space must be a neutral space: a space fair to everyone. You can do whatever you like in your private space. As soon as you cross the doorstep, however, you are no longer a completely free person. You are now free within the laws of the public space, and those must be designed to prevent anyone from markedly violating neutrality. What is neutrality? The most neutral person is someone walking along on their own, quietly minding their own business. Bringing an uncontrolled animal, a speeding

bicycle, boogie boxes, rowdiness, religious and political symbols, into the public space are all prima facie neutrality violations. We need positive liberty governments that define and protect the public space. What we actually have are negative liberty governments that leave the public space largely alone, allowing the hawks to impose their obnoxious tastes and beliefs on it, and giving zero support to retaliators when they righteously fight back. The public space must be defined by neutrality, and the law should give overwhelming support to those who retaliate against neutrality violations by aggressive hawks.

The Family Many people have a slavish devotion to family. However, if you accept the concept of reincarnation, you have had plenty of families; indeed countless families. So it’s no longer rational to be transfixed by your current family in preference to all the families you have had and will have. The whole world is your family. As soon as you grasp that, you see how utterly irrational negative liberty, privilege and nepotism are. You are harming your own true family (everyone) every time you prefer and privilege your particular family (current family) over your general family. Fascinatingly, Abrahamic resurrection theory goes hand in hand with the idea that you have one family for all eternity, hence automatically promotes negative liberty and an obsession with the particular family. Reincarnation theory, on the other hand, goes hand in hand with the idea that you have countless families, hence are part of a vast general family rather than a particular family. This view promotes positive liberty and a preoccupation with the General Will and the good of all rather than the good of the few. The vast majority of negative libertarians – those who hate the collective – are Abrahamists, hence resurrectionists. The East, with its reincarnational views, is devoted to the collective over the individual and family. The West, with its resurrectionist views, is committed to the individual and family over the collective.

Radical We are often accused of being too extreme or too radical. Well, here’s a newsflash, the vast majority of people (sheeple) are far too moderate, passive, liberal, politically correct, and tolerant (even of intolerance). These

moderates are one of the central problems with the world. Their passivity and moderation allow hawks to walk all over them and enslave the world. We need a far more radical world, a far more retaliatory world. All bland and banal moderates, all the grey people, all the hopeless and helpless doves, are sickening. They can even justifiably be called evil since they lend so much support to the hawk forces of evil through their lack of resistance.

Tranquillity “It is neither wealth nor splendour but tranquillity and occupation which give happiness.” – Thomas Jefferson How on earth can today’s rich right wing American libertarians claim Jefferson as one of their own? He would have despised everything they stand for. Jefferson was a Jacobin – an extreme left wing radical, the most left wing American politician of them all. What America needs above all else is a new Thomas Jefferson, the man who will establish the American Meritocratic Republic that will apply 100% inheritance tax and bring the banks and Wall Street under full State (public) control.

The Big Surprise Ayn Rand, the heroine of extreme right wing capitalists, said, “Only the man who does not need it, is fit to inherit wealth, the man who would make his fortune no matter where he started.” That being the case, the man has no need of it, and no one else is fit for it, so Rand supports 100% inheritance tax!

The Bicameral Brain Consciousness resides in the left hemisphere of the brain, and the unconscious in the right hemisphere of the brain. Consciousness comprises the senses and reason (thinking). The unconscious comprises feelings and intuition. The left hemisphere is the centre of language and abstract logic. The right hemisphere has no language and no abstract logic. The left hemisphere is about Logos and the right hemisphere about Mythos (emotional stories). The left hemisphere deals with mathematics, physics

and metaphysics and uses conventional abstract logic. The right hemisphere deals with feelings and intuitions and uses story logic (emotional “logic”). The language capabilities of the left hemisphere are harnessed to turn feelings and intuitions into stories – into dramas, plays, novels, poems, fables, fairytales, folktales, movies, mythologies, legends, and, above all, religions. All of these are clear fictions, except religion, which claims to be fact but is in fact the same as all the others – pure fiction. Only Logos is true. Mythos is always a fabrication, a fantasy. The tragedy of humanity is that the vast majority of people are under the control of their right hemisphere, their unconscious, and are in thrall to their feelings and intuitions, and operate via story logic (Mythos). Most of them are irrational and despise science, mathematics and philosophy. Conspiracy theories are pure Mythos. David Icke has no contact with reality at all, and talks about shape-shifting, pan-dimensional reptilians running the world (sometimes operating from a base on the moon or in the hollow earth) – and is believed by millions of demented people, wholly cut off from reason. Conspiracy theories are simply the latest guise of religion. Crazy “prophets”, claiming to be in direct contact with God, announce that devils and demons (the “Illuminati”) are running the world and are the root of all evil. In fact, the Illuminati are despised because they stand for reason, enlightenment and Logos, and they ridicule all of the Mythos garbage of mainstream religion and conspiracy theories. So, the tragedy of our world is that it operates according to feelings and intuitions (Mythos) rather than science, mathematics and philosophy (Logos). The world is totally irrational – a cosmic madhouse, a planetary psyche ward. The lunatics truly are running the asylum. Moses, Jesus, Mohammed, Luther, Joseph Smith, Ayn Rand, Alex Jones, David Icke, Benjamin Fulford, Henry Makow – these are all the same kind of people – conjurors of absurd fantasies that dupe the weak-minded and soft in the head. All of these self-styled “prophets of truth” never mention mathematics, physics or metaphysics. They never get involved with reason and logic. Instead, they tell huge, elaborate stories and grand conspiracies, involving angels and demons, gods and devils, aliens and ancient civilizations. If you’ve fallen for their nonsense then you too are infected by the disease of unreason. Why should you believe the Illuminati? Because we are ontological mathematicians and mathematics is the only subject that never lies.

For humanity to evolve to divinity, the people of Logos (HyperHumanity, the Hyperboreans, the children of Apollo) must wrest control from the Mythos mob, the intoxicated, demented followers of Dionysus. We must become a left brain rather than right brain human race. Reason must dominate feelings rather than the other way around. Logos must replace Mythos as the dominant attitude and tendency of the world. We have a right brain world of Mythos. We need a left brain world of Logos. We must move from story logic to mathematical logic. And then mainstream religion will fall, conspiracy theories will die out and the privileged elites who prosper by creating a false consciousness in the ignorant masses (who are too dumb to know what’s being done to them) will be toppled by a well-educated, meritocratic, Logos people. That is the future of the human race. Be on the right side of dialectical inevitability. There is no question that the most intelligent will one day rule this world and it will be an Illuminated, Platonic world devoted to the optimization of humanity through reason rather than crazy old stories. “If someone should reduce Plato to a system, he would render a great service to the human race...” – Leibniz

***** During waking, the consciousness in the left brain is presented with sensory data pertaining to the external world. During sleeping (dreaming), the consciousness in the left brain is presented with non-sensory, emotional and intuitive visions and symbols pertaining to the right brain (unconscious). So, when we are awake, we look out to the world and, when we are dreaming, we look into our own unconscious. It’s from the unconscious that religion and conspiracy theories come, and they are devoid of reason and logic. That’s a simple fact whether you like it or not. Anything that is not about mathematics is pure and utter bullshit, and always will be. Even science is discredited by not being nearly mathematical enough and privileging sensory information over mathematical rationalism. The smartest people are humanity’s salvation. That’s the bottom line. Where do you stand? Are you for or against the rule of reason? Will you defend ludicrous stories against ontological mathematics? Then you are one of the fools who will in due course be crushed by the truth, by reason itself.

Humanity will either embrace Reason or perish. Muslims in mosques will not build starships that take us to the ends of the galaxy. Conspiracy theorists will not transform our world into paradise. But mathematics will.

***** “All things are numbers.” – Pythagoras “Number rules all.” – Pythagoras Five hundred years before the advent of Christianity, Pythagoras founded the formal religion of Illuminism – ontological mathematics. Had humanity followed the Logos of Pythagoras rather than the ludicrous Mythos of Moses, Jesus Christ and Mohammed, humans would now be the Gods themselves, rather than on their knees to false Gods masquerading as bearers of truth. The universe is defined and controlled by the God Equation. The humans that understand this equation will become Gods. Those that don’t will become extinct. They are as pointless and ill-fated as the dinosaurs. Survival is not compulsory. If you wish to be on the side of the inevitable winners, you must become Illuminated. You must join HyperHumanity and leave behind the apes.

***** To all those who oppose the Illuminati, we tell you this: you are doomed. The triumph of the Illuminated Ones, the Enlightened Ones, is inevitable. The Dialectic has spoken. We are the future. We are the Omega Point. We are the Coming Race. You are the dead, failed past that lives in a fantasy world of total lies and delusions that you insanely proclaim truth and certainty. The Truth will set us free, and the truth is ontological mathematics – whether you like it or not, whether you understand it or not. The Truth cares not one jot for your ability to grasp it. The truth is not democratic. The truth is not emotional. The truth is not hot or cold. (“The truth has no temperature.” – Cormac McCarthy) The Truth is not for all. The Gates of Truth open only to the most intelligent. If you’re not one of them, God help you! The Truth won’t. Stupid people spread the lie that the world revolves around the axis of good and evil. It doesn’t. The true axis is that of smart versus stupid. Good and evil are irrelevant (and almost wholly based on opinion and

interpretation rather than fact). Everything is about intelligence, talent and creativity. Nietzsche highlighted the ancient difference between “good and bad” and “good and evil”. The masters defined the former and the slaves the latter. For the masters, “good” meant strong, powerful, heroic, brave and honourable while “bad” meant everything base, common, vulgar and associated with the ordinary people – the mob. For the slaves, “good” meant meek, weak, humble, faithful, poor, kind and forbearing, and “evil” was everything connected with the masters. Nietzsche saw that Christianity was a classic slave morality, presenting the weak as the children of God and the strong as the spawn of the Devil. In the modern day, the central axis is rich versus poor (the 1% versus the 99%). The rich deploy the masters’ ancient classification of good and bad, with “good” being everything connected with the rich and “bad” everything connected with the poor. But today’s poor (slaves) are highly conflicted. In the past, the slaves had no difficulty in regarding the masters as wicked and demonic. However, in the present day, all of the poor long to be rich and therefore envy and admire the rich, and want to join them. You can’t label the rich “evil” if you want to be rich yourself. Jesus Christ routinely condemned the rich and yet Christians, especially in America, lust to be rich capitalists. So, “good and bad” and “good and evil” have now become bizarrely mixed. Whereas the slaves once hated the rich, seeing them as the cruel, oppressive masters, and the rich hated the people, seeing them as weak, pathetic scum and slaves, now the people practically worship the rich, and the rich hypocritically pander to the poor because they need them to buy their consumer goods to make them even richer. Masters and slaves are now in an unholy alliance, which is why it’s so hard to get the people to rise up against the rich elite. Deep down, the ambition of most people is to be part of the rich elite, so that means they are not highly motivated to topple them, and the elite rely on this for their selfpreservation. In present-day America, many people despise the political elite of Washington D.C. and yet they want to replace government and the State with the free market, which is the best news the super rich capitalists could ever have. In other words, they want to replace a political, elected and accountable elite with a financial, unelected and unaccountable elite. How bizarre is that? Total madness.

Free-market capitalism is itself a classic example of irrationalism. Instead of a world ruled by rational geniuses applying systematic methods such as the scientific method or dialectical method, we have a so-called “invisible hand” (i.e. no hand at all, or the hidden hand of rich cartels) controlling the market and thus the global economy. The market is fuelled purely by emotion – by greed and fear (boom and bust). Is that a sane, rational way to run an economy? During “bust” phases, the world is exposed to the concept of “failing” markets. These are markets in which competition and choice aren’t achieving the expected and desired results. But, of course, all markets are failing. They are all subject to monopolistic and oligopolistic practices, to cartels, to being rigged and manipulated. There’s no such thing as a free market in a world controlled by the super rich with overwhelming market dominance. If everyone on earth had the same influence on the market, it would then be free, but we are about as far from that as it’s possible to get – which is why the 1% rule the world. We now have a tacit war between global capitalists (with no loyalty to any nation state: they will take their money anywhere to get the highest returns) and nation-state capitalists who seek to deliver prosperity to the citizens of their own country. Governments are nation-state capitalists, but they are powerless against the much richer global capitalists. As an example, London is going through a massive house price boom, but it’s not Londoners who are driving up the prices but global capitalists who are using cash to buy London property as a capitalist investment. Why are Londoners being priced out of their homes by rich foreign capitalists? How can that be right? What is the nation-state government of Britain doing about it? Well, fuck all of course, since the British government is full of rich capitalists and apologists for global capitalism and the “free market”. What’s happening to London will soon happen to the whole world. Global capitalists will be running the world by default. This is the true global conspiracy. The “Truth” Movement bang on about 9/11. What they should be attacking is global capitalism but, of course, the vast majority of the “Truth” Movement are Randian advocates of unfettered free markets and global capitalism! Just as prophets are always the false prophets they warn us against, so are conspiracy theorists always the conspirators we should be most worrying about since their plans for the world are always the worst of

all. Who in their right mind would say that capitalism slightly restrained by government should be replaced by capitalism restrained by nothing at all? Capitalism, a system of boom and bust, of irrational emotion, of emotional consumerism, of vast, disproportionate private wealth, is the biggest problem facing the world. Any debate that is not about taming capitalism and bringing it under the rational control of the people rather than the irrational control of markets is simply an evasion and, in fact, a direct contribution to helping global capitalists seize complete control of everything, bringing the world under the rule of global banks, global corporations and the global super rich. To all enemies of government and the State, we ask you a very simple question: how are you going to stop the global banks, global corporations and global super rich? You are removing the only thing that is capable of standing up to them. The central problem of the world isn’t that of government and State, it’s that of global capitalism. The problem with government isn’t that it’s too strong but that it’s far too weak and can’t do a single thing to curb the inexorable rise of global capitalism. Nation-state governments have in fact become the puppets and public face of global capitalism. They have no interest in resisting globalism. Rather, they are working to bring it about. This is the true “New World Order” that people fear so much. It’s global rule by global capitalism, with the nation-state eliminated. The only people who can save you (with your help!) are the Illuminati and the Meritocratic New World Order that crushes global capitalism once and for all and puts the people and their accountable governments in charge of the world. If the vast majority of people are irrational, badly educated, and poorly qualified, the last thing they want to do is proclaim intelligence the quality that brings you closer to God. No, they want irrational faith, irrational emotion and something as nebulous as “good” to be the path to God. Have you ever met anyone at all who regarded himself as evil? There’s no such thing. All people think they are good and “evil” is a label they attach to their enemies and the people they dislike. There’s an IQ test, but no Morality Test. If the vast majority of people aspire to be rich, they certainly don’t want to say that the wealthy are evil or barred from heaven, so the notion has even come about, in direct contradiction of what was said by Jesus Christ, that wealth is a sign of God’s favour and poverty a sign of his disfavour.

What you never hear is that the intelligent are the divinely blessed and the unintelligent cursed by God. In this world, the intelligent aren’t the rulers. Rather, they fall in line with the religious notions of “good and evil”, and, like everyone else, they work for the rich and seek financial status and security. The destiny of the human race is for the intelligent to leave behind “good and evil”, “good and bad”, “rich and poor” and to seize power through the enormous advantage they have of being able to do all the smart things that the “good”, the “evil”, the “bad”, the rich and the poor cannot do. Just as human beings have total dominion over the animal world thanks to their superior reason, so the human beings with superior reason can, and should, rule the human world. That will inevitably happen when the smart decide that they are no longer willing to play second fiddle to the rich, when audacious Nietzschean Supermen simply take what is rightfully theirs – the control of the world’s destiny. Right now, the rich (secular power) on the one hand and the priest caste (religious power) on the other are directing our world. It’s time for the intelligent to cast down the rich and the priests and to deliver rationalism in the shape of a global Plato’s Republic of Meritocracy and Equal Opportunities, ruled by philosopher kings and queens. It’s from that platform, and that one alone, that we can have, first, a Star Trek future and, secondly, a divine future where humans become actual Gods. If you’re stupid, please go on believing in absurd religions and conspiracy theories, please go on worshipping the rich. When the Harvest Time comes, it will be so much easier to deal with you.

Russell Brand In a TV interview, Russell Brand said something we have advocated for years – do not vote in elections. Every time you vote, you legitimise the system that is oppressing you and ruining this world. You are a turkey voting for Christmas. People who have been completely conned by the establishment, and now have a profoundly internalised false consciousness, continue to encourage everyone to vote, “to make a difference”. The whole point is that you will never make a difference. No matter whom you vote for, you will never affect those who really count – the unelected and unaccountable banksters, corporatocrats, monarchs, super rich and “the market”. The rich have ensured that you vote only for an illusion, while the

real power is never up for election, and is maintained in the great dynastic families, such as the Rothschilds, that rule for generation after generation, through inheritance, the means by which power and wealth are transmitted privately and kept well out of reach of the people. The Old World Order will always rule no matter what you do at the ballot box. The only way to get rid of them is through 100% inheritance tax, and that will be implemented not by a democracy but a Meritocratic Republic. To vote is to conspire against yourself, to be complicit in your own slavery. The Occupy Movement should be replaced by the “No Vote” Movement, and Russell Brand would be an excellent leader for it. It’s time to get real. Democracy and capitalism are extremely successful – for the 1%. For everyone else, they are a catastrophe. “...imagining the overthrow of the current political system is the only way I can be enthused about politics.” – Russell Brand “I have never voted. Like most people I am utterly disenchanted by politics. Like most people I regard politicians as frauds and liars and the current political system as nothing more than a bureaucratic means for furthering the augmentation and advantages of economic elites.” – Russell Brand “I don’t vote because to me it seems like a tacit act of compliance...” – Russell Brand “Total revolution of consciousness and our entire social, political and economic system is what interests me, but that’s not on the ballot. Is utopian revolution possible? The freethinking social architect Buckminster Fuller said humanity now faces a choice: oblivion or utopia. We’re inertly ambling towards oblivion, is utopia really an option?” – Russell Brand “I heard recently Oliver Cromwell’s address to the rump parliament in 1653 where he bawls out the whole of the House of Commons as ‘whores, virtueless horses and money-grabbing dicklickers’. I added the last one but, honestly, that is the vibe. ... The fact remains that if you were to recite his speech in parliament today you’d be hard pushed to find someone who could be legitimately offended.” – Russell Brand “Hear you this ... young people, poor people, not-rich people, most people do not give a fuck about politics. They see no difference between Cameron, Clegg, Boris, either of the Milibands or anyone else.” – Russell Brand

“These young people have been marketed to their whole lives but denied the economic means to participate in the carnival.” – Russell Brand “Apathy is a rational reaction to a system that no longer represents, hears or addresses the vast majority of people. A system that is apathetic, in fact, to the needs of the people it was designed to serve.” – Russell Brand “Of the two possible reactions to the mechanised indifference and inefficiency of their alleged servants, not leaders – apathy or rage – apathy is the more accessible and is certainly preferable to those who govern.” – Russell Brand “The right has all the advantages, just as the devil has all the best tunes. Conservatism appeals to our selfishness and fear, our desire and selfinterest; they neatly nurture and then harvest the inherent and incubating individualism.” – Russell Brand “I imagine that neurologically the pathway travelled by a fearful or selfish impulse is more expedient and well travelled than the route of the altruistic pang. In simple terms of circuitry I suspect it is easier to connect these selfish inclinations.” – Russell Brand “The system is adept at turning our aggression on to one another.” – Russell Brand “We British seem to be a bit embarrassed about revolution, like the passion is uncouth or that some tea might get spilled on our cuffs in the uprising. That revolution is a bit French or worse still American. Well, the alternative is extinction so now might be a good time to re-evaluate. The apathy is in fact a transmission problem, when we are given the correct information in an engaging fashion, we will stir.” – Russell Brand “Cameron, Osborne, Boris, all of them lot, they went to the same schools and the same universities that have the same decor as the old buildings from which they now govern us. It’s not that they’re malevolent; it’s just that they’re irrelevant. Relics of an old notion, like Old Spice: it’s fine that it exists but no one should actually use it.” – Russell Brand “Capitalism is not real; it is an idea. America is not real; it is an idea that someone had ages ago.” – Russell Brand

“Take to the streets, together, with the understanding that the feeling that you aren’t being heard or seen or represented isn’t psychosis; it’s government policy.” – Russell Brand

***** Brand is simply articulating what all sane people are thinking. The current game is over. It officially died in 2008 when capitalism became insolvent and was bailed out by socialism. The issue now is about the shape of the new game. You should no longer engage at all with the Ancien Régime. They are dead men walking, just as they were in 1788 when the French Revolution was an inconceivable future event. Yet it happened, and so will the Global Revolution that deposes the Global Rich.

The Voting Strike In Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged, the American super rich capitalist elite go on strike until they are begged to rule America. Isn’t it time for a global Voting Strike? All of the people should stop voting until they have something worthwhile to vote for. Voting simply because someone tells you to is totalitarianism. Voting to get the worse elected to keep out the worst is madness. Don’t do it. Vote only when you are 100% committed to what you are voting for. Otherwise, don’t vote. The wholesale withdrawal of the people’s votes will remove legitimacy from the Old World Order and bring it down. Isn’t it time for the New World Order – rule by the people for the first time in history?

The Past is Now We live in a world that is devoted to manufacturing nostalgia and sentimentality, to bringing the failed ways of the past into the present and legitimising and consolidating them. It’s time to forget the old, failed ways. It’s time for the rule of reason always directed at the future and not morosely dwelling in the past and looking back to some “Golden Age”. There never was any great period in human history. Life has always been shit and a nightmare for the vast majority of people. The Golden Age is yet to come, and it won’t be created by nostalgia but by rationalism. Only mathematical eternal truths of reason are genuine knowledge. Everything else is mere conjecture, opinion, hypothesis, interpretation,

belief, delusion, propaganda, rhetoric, dissimulation, deceit and bullshit. We are the Truth. We are the Light. We are Reason. We are the Ontological Mathematikoi. We are the Pythagoreans. We are the Illuminati. We alone have followed the path of absolute truth. We alone saw the ultimate secret of existence – that it is 100% mathematical and that we inhabit a living mathematical universe devoted to only one thing: dialectically solving itself. The solution to the universe is when it has reached its optimal state, when every mathematical soul (monad) has become the soul of a God! A universe of Gods is the inevitable outcome of a universe of living, evolving, teleological mathematics. The universe has no Creator. The universe is a mathematical process for reaching mathematical perfection (which is the same as “divinity”), and it does so via the fundamental unit of ontological mathematics – the mathematical soul. This is a God Factory, designed to transmute ordinary souls into Gods. Ontological mathematics is the ultimate religion because it has as its only ingredient the soul. We inhabit Soul World. Everything you see, feel, sense and experience is a product of mathematical souls alone. There is nothing else. This is a universe of mathematical becoming, and the whole universe is a reflection of the individual soul that each and every one of us possesses. The universe is all of us writ large. As Above, So Below.

The Cosmic Code eix = cos x + i sin x eiπ + 1 = 0 “something” = “nothing” (the mathematical secret of existence) In Hoc Signo Vinces

Plans “No plan survives contact with the enemy.” – Moltke All plans change. No plan survives contact with the demands of the real world.

The Test Would you rather have the definitive answer to everything or enormous worldly wealth and power? The Mythos world has always been overwhelmingly devoted to the pursuit of the latter rather than the former. In a Logos world, the reverse would be true.

“Free” Markets? Imagine six large corporations in competition with each other. They can choose to savagely compete and cut their profit margins to the bone (the best outcome for the people), or they can tacitly agree to all take an excellent profit by charging effectively the same prices (thus offering no competition at all, and acting as a cosy cartel). Advocates of the “free” market claim that the former happens. In fact, it’s always the latter that happens. In a system predicated on maximising profit, there is no incentive at all for corporations to cut their profits to the minimum through attritional Darwinian competition. Moreover, if there were savage competition, one corporation would win and all the others would perish, hence competition would be eliminated and we would in due course be subjected to a monopoly. Either way, there’s no such thing as a competitive free market and all the capitalist rhetoric and propaganda is designed to conceal antimarket and anti-competition monopolies and oligopolies.

The Question Who should rule? The rich or the smart? Hitherto, the rich have ruled and the smart have worked for them. What happens when the smart stop working for the rich and take power for themselves? Then wealth is no longer revered, but, rather, ideas. The world is transformed overnight. A world based on wealth is not a world with a Star Trek future. A world based on ideas is. The rich must be toppled and the smart must take over. The age of billionaires will be over for good. At most, the successful will be millionaires, and, when they die, any of their money that they haven’t spent will be returned to the Commonwealth via 100% inheritance tax. Never again will inheritance allow rich families to rule the world for generation after generation, serving their own private interest and building their own private utopias rather than public utopias.

The Retreat “Every moment of one’s existence one is growing into more or retreating into less.” – Normal Mailer You’re either ascending or descending. That’s true of people, stocks and shares, religions, economies, nations ... everything.

American Psycho by Bret Easton Ellis “...its savagely coherent picture of a society lethally addicted to blandness...” – John Walsh, The Independent If free-market capitalism were to be personified, it would be as the deranged Patrick Bateman in American Psycho. “It’s an amazing satire on capitalist extremism, a world of surfaces in which everything about the milieu of bankers, bond dealers and billionaires in late-1980s Wall Street is minutely described, except the reason why one of them is killing people. Our guide is Patrick Bateman, aged 26, handsome, charming, cool, sophisticated, cynical and designer-suited. Bateman knows his labels. His eyes study the bodies and clothes of all his associates, identifying where everything comes from: ‘Reed Thompson walks in wearing a wool-plaid four-button double-breasted suit and a striped cotton shirt and a silk tie, all Armani, plus slightly tacky blue cotton socks by Interwoven and black Ferragamo cap-toe shoes that look exactly like mine, with a copy of The Wall Street Journal held in a nicely manicured fist and a Bill Kaiserman tweed balmacaan overcoat draped casually across the other arm. He nods and sits across from us at the table. Soon after, Todd Broderick walks in wearing...’” – John Walsh, The Independent “Bateman’s narrating voice is a seamless hybrid of nullity and irritation. He notes everything around him with toneless exactitude (until the reader starts to skim the mantra of Brooks Brothers shirts and Oliver Peoples eyewear) and passes judgement on his fellow bankers and their girlfriends with flat disgust. We eavesdrop on their conversation. Nobody talks about money, investments, or jobs; they talk about getting concert tickets, getting the best table at Dorsia or Nell’s.” – John Walsh, The Independent

“Four characters have a tense exchange about which has the best business card. Everyone seems interchangeable. Investment bankers called Robert or Craig or Timothy are routinely mistaken for each other. Everyone goes to the same gym, follows the same moisturiser regimen, drinks in the same bars, fancies the same blonde ‘hardbody’ girls. The only thing missing is any human feeling.” – John Walsh, The Independent “Bateman knows this. He accepts his own nullity. ‘There is an idea of a Patrick Bateman, some kind of abstraction, but there is no real me,’ he says at one point, ‘only an entity, something illusory, and though I can hide my cold gaze and you can shake my hand and feel flesh gripping yours and maybe you can even sense our lifestyles are probably comparable: I simply am not there.’ John Walsh, The Independent “...we’re dulled into accepting this echo-chamber of trendy nothingness...” – John Walsh, The Independent “...its chronicle of affectless encounters...” John Walsh, The Independent “As he [Bateman] gets madder, and tries to confess his ghastly crimes, his fellow bankers hardly notice. Their moral compass is haywire. ‘Jesus, Bateman, you’re a raving lunatic!’ says Craig McDermott. ‘You can’t eat at Smith & Wollensky’s without ordering the hash browns!’” – John Walsh, The Independent “...so belligerently satirical about the consumer world...” – John Walsh, The Independent “...so coldly, disgustingly inhuman...” – John Walsh, The Independent “...turned the Ninnies of Wall Street into modern-day male Stepford Wives and made the killings almost plausible as an extreme response to their blandness.” – John Walsh, The Independent “And there’s a wrenching pathos about his final scenes, when he confesses his crimes to his lawyer and isn’t believed because, he’s told, ‘Bateman is such a boring, spineless lightweight’ that he isn’t capable of murder.” – John Walsh, The Independent “And what is American Psycho, and its irrepressible titular hero, Bateman, but a masterly conflation of a chimerical and superficial Enron world of

dodgy money, and a man who takes to murder because he has lost sight of all sense of himself?” John Walsh, The Independent Free-market capitalists – the elites that rule the world – are all like Bateman. They are sociopaths, yet astoundingly bland. Yet the people of the world must be sociopaths too to let themselves be ruled by these mad elites. Capitalism is nihilism. It stands for nothing except the accumulation of money. It has no human values. It’s the ideology of the Devil.

The Choice “Freedom in capitalist society always remains about the same as it was in ancient Greek republics: Freedom for slave owners.” – Lenin “The mythology of freedom under capitalism for the average person is a con job.” – Bryant McGill You can have inheritance or you can have equal opportunities. You can’t have both. What’s it to be? The history of the world has been the history of powerful families seeking to perpetuate their power down the generations: to rule dynastically over the world like hereditary royal families. Just as monarchy would have been far more effective if the monarch were always the strongest person in the land (meritocratic monarchy) rather than simply the offspring of the previous monarch (hereditary monarchy), so the world would be far stronger if it were ruled by the smartest and most talented (meritocrats) rather than those who simply inherited their parents’ wealth (plutocrats). Nothing is more important than destroying all hereditary systems. For merit to flourish, inheritance must perish. That is the law of nature.

The Selection There is always one infallible test of whether or not someone is committed to something. Are they still working on it seven years later? Most people become interested in various projects but then, seven weeks later (never mind seven years), they have given up and moved onto something else, the next fad. The Illuminati very rarely recruit anyone who has not shown clear commitment to the cause of enlightenment for several years. To do otherwise would be folly.

In ancient Rome, a desultor was a rider in the circus who jumped from one galloping horse to another. Most people are “desultors” – they “skip about” hastily, casually, trivially and superficially from one thing to the next. They have no aims, methods or endurance. You are lost unless you can find a horse to stick to. Have you found yours?

The “Doing” “Religion is doing; a man does not merely think his religion or feel it, he ‘lives’ his religion as much as he is able, otherwise it is not religion but fantasy or philosophy.” – George Gurdjieff All religions know that you must make the masses “do” the religion. Islam and Judaism make you do it all the time. Christianity used to make you do it, but now it doesn’t, and that’s why Christianity is fading away. Christianity seems more and more like a bad philosophy or a childish fantasy.

Faith or Insanity? “The difference between faith and insanity is that faith is the ability to hold firmly to a conclusion that is incompatible with the evidence, whereas insanity is the ability to hold firmly to a conclusion that is incompatible with the evidence.” – William Harwood

The Cosmic Fraud “How do you give something away with the knowledge that you will get it back in three days, and then claim it to be the ‘Ultimate Sacrifice’?” – Jake Jesser Christianity is a Mythos that billions buy into and yet none of it makes any sense at all. It’s literally mad. “I have recently been examining all the known superstitions of the world, and do not find in our particular superstition [Christianity] one redeeming feature. They are all alike, founded upon fables and mythologies.” – Thomas Jefferson

How the Rich Became “Good” “In the United States there’s a Puritan ethic and a mythology of success. He who is successful is good. In Latin countries, in Catholic countries, a successful person is a sinner.” – Umberto Eco

The End of Capitalism “We shall once more value ends above means and prefer the good to the useful.” – John Maynard Keynes “We shall honour those who can teach us how to pluck the hour and the day virtuously and well, the delightful people who are capable of taking direct enjoyment in things, the lilies of the field who toil not, neither do they spin.” – John Maynard Keynes “I see us free, therefore, to return to some of the most sure and certain principles of religion and traditional virtue – that avarice is a vice, that the exaction of usury is a misdemeanour, and the love of money is detestable, that those walk most truly in the paths of virtue and sane wisdom who take least thought for the morrow.” – John Maynard Keynes “Yet there is no country and no people, I think, who can look forward to the age of leisure and of abundance without a dread. For we have been trained too long to strive and not to enjoy. It is a fearful problem for the ordinary person, with no special talents, to occupy himself, especially if he no longer has roots in the soil or in custom or in the beloved conventions of a traditional society. To judge from the behaviour and the achievements of the wealthy classes today in any quarter of the world, the outlook is very depressing! For these are, so to speak, our advance guard – those who are spying out the promised land for the rest of us and pitching their camp there. For they have most of them failed disastrously, so it seems to me – those who have an independent income but no associations or duties or ties – to solve the problem which has been set them.” – John Maynard Kenyes “Of course there will still be many people with intense, unsatisfied purposiveness who will blindly pursue wealth – unless they can find some plausible substitute. But the rest of us will no longer be under any obligation to applaud and encourage them.” – John Maynard Kenyes

“But beware! The time for all this is not yet. For at least another hundred years we must pretend to ourselves and to everyone that fair is foul and foul is fair; for foul is useful and fair is not. Avarice and usury and precaution must be our gods for a little longer still. For only they can lead us out of the tunnel of economic necessity into daylight.” – John Maynard Kenyes “If economists could manage to get themselves thought of as humble, competent people, on a level with dentists, that would be splendid!” – John Maynard Kenyes

The Fake Illuminati There’s a Facebook page that claims to be by the Illuminati. It’s highly successful with around two million likes. Why is it so popular? Well, it seems to consist of a never-ending stream of trite “thought for the day” platitudes. In the internet age when people can’t focus on anything for more than an instant, this appears the way to way to go. The masses are attracted to pseudo-profundity, the simulation of profundity without the hard and difficult actuality. The Armageddon Conspiracy website is the opposite of the Facebook page in question – full of long, difficult, challenging material. That’s definitely not the way to go for anyone who wishes to court popularity.

Exaggeration All conspiracy theories are immense, grandiose exaggerations and misrepresentations. So, when governments put fluoride in the water to improve dental health, conspiracy theorists depict this as a diabolical plan to poison the population and rot their brains. They offer no scientific case to explain why fluoride isn’t good for teeth, and no scientific information to explain why fluoride is toxic and harmful to the brain. But who cares? Conspiracy theories aren’t about science. They are about putting the boot into government and spreading fear and alarm. Truth is always the first casualty of a conspiracy theory. A simple question arises. If the government is involved in countless conspiracies against the people, why haven’t all the conspiracy theorists been taken out by now? Wouldn’t they be the top of the list for any government conspiracy? Why have they been unaffected by the fluoride and chemtrails?

A conspiracy that fails to remove the knowledge that a conspiracy is taking place isn’t much of a conspiracy. 1% of the people of the world have conspired to own the world. Yet how many conspiracy theorists assert that free-market global capitalism is the biggest danger facing the world? Well, none at all – because they’re all free-market capitalists! Capitalism is the greatest conspiracy of them all because it convinced everyone that it was no conspiracy at all.

Fluoridation Many nations carry out water fluoridation since it’s an effective public health initiative for reducing dental cavities in both children and adults. Bizarrely, fluoridation has become the subject of a set of hysterical conspiracy theories. Wikipedia says: “Water fluoridation has frequently been the subject of conspiracy theories. During the ‘Red Scare’ in the United States during the late 1940s and 1950s, and to a lesser extent in the 1960s, activists on the far right of American politics routinely asserted that fluoridation was part of a farreaching plot to impose a socialist or communist regime. They also opposed other public health programs, notably mass vaccination and mental health services. Their views were influenced by opposition to a number of major social and political changes that had happened in recent years: the growth of internationalism, particularly the UN and its programs; the introduction of social welfare provisions, particularly the various programs established by the New Deal; and government efforts to reduce perceived inequalities in the social structure of the United States. ... “Some took the view that fluoridation was only the first stage of a plan to control the American people. Fluoridation, it was claimed, was merely a stepping-stone on the way to implementing more ambitious programs. Others asserted the existence of a plot by communists and the United Nations to ‘deplete the brainpower and sap the strength of a generation of American children’. ... “It was portrayed in Stanley Kubrick’s 1964 film Dr. Strangelove, in which the character General Jack D. Ripper initiates a nuclear war in the hope of thwarting a communist plot to ‘sap and impurify’ the ‘precious bodily fluids’ of the American people with fluoridated water.” – Wikipedia

Fluoridation has been described as totalitarian compulsory mass medication and even as a form of public mass murder. Another suggestion is that it’s a cynical public relations ploy by industrial users of fluoride (including the government’s nuclear weapons programme), to show how safe fluoride is (even though it certainly isn’t, according to the anti-fluoridation cabal). What’s amazing regarding the fluoridation debate is how little chemistry is mentioned. Fluoridation is entirely a scientific and health issue. If fluoride has excellent benefits for society and no adverse effects, it’s irresponsible for any government not to fluoridate water. If a cure for cancer could be put in the water supply, which government wouldn’t go ahead? Yet you can be sure that extreme right wingers would denounce it as a diabolical conspiracy by the government and State to wipe out billions of people. Are you one of the right wing nut jobs? Here’s how to tell. In Kubrick’s Dr. Strangelove, the following exchange takes place between American General Jack D. Ripper and British Group Captain Lionel Mandrake: General Jack D. Ripper: Mandrake, do you recall what Clemenceau once said about war? Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: No, I don’t think I do, sir, no. General Jack D. Ripper: He said war was too important to be left to the generals. When he said that, 50 years ago, he might have been right. But today, war is too important to be left to politicians. They have neither the time, the training, nor the inclination for strategic thought. I can no longer sit back and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids. ... Mandrake, do you realize that in addition to fluoridating water, why, there are studies underway to fluoridate salt, flour, fruit juices, soup, sugar, milk... ice cream. Ice cream, Mandrake, children’s ice cream. ... You know when fluoridation first began? Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: I... no, no. I don’t, Jack. General Jack D. Ripper: Nineteen hundred and forty-six. 1946, Mandrake. How does that coincide with your post-war Commie conspiracy, huh? It’s incredibly obvious, isn’t it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That’s the way your hard-core Commie works.

Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: Uh, Jack, Jack, listen... tell me, tell me, Jack. When did you first... become... well, develop this theory? General Jack D. Ripper: [somewhat embarrassed] Well, I, uh... I... I... first became aware of it, Mandrake, during the physical act of love. Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: Hmm. General Jack D. Ripper: Yes, a uh, a profound sense of fatigue... a feeling of emptiness followed. Luckily I... I was able to interpret these feelings correctly. Loss of essence. Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: Hmm. General Jack D. Ripper: I can assure you it has not recurred, Mandrake. Women uh... women sense my power and they seek the life essence. I, uh... I do not avoid women, Mandrake. Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: No. General Jack D. Ripper: But I... I do deny them my essence. ... Fluoridation is the most monstrously conceived and dangerous communist plot we have ever had to face. ... Mandrake, have you ever seen a Commie drink a glass of water? Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: Well, no, I can’t say I have. All American conspiracy theorists are the equivalents of the deranged General Jack D. Ripper (Jack the Ripper!). They are mentally ill and extremely dangerous. Why do they hate the United Nations, European Union, Government, the State, Society, and so on? – because they are terrified of positive liberty, of “Catholicism”, “Communism”, “Socialism” ... of the State daring to override the particular wills of selfish individuals in favour of the General Will of all the people. It is not and never has been the remit of any Government or State to enable elite individuals and families to dominate society. If the Government or State does not act in the interests of all of its citizens then it’s automatically illegitimate and tyrannical. It must be overthrown. Capitalist “democracy” – as the means for allowing the unelected, unaccountable capitalist elite to control the people – has no legitimacy whatsoever. All conspiracy theorists are negative libertarians and the vast majority are ultra right wing free-market capitalists who believe that the

rich elite should dominate everyone else. What they fear above all is a strong government or State coming along and ending rule by the rich. All of their conspiracies have exactly the same purpose: to make people terrified of government and the State, and to revere the rich and all successful capitalists. They, in fact, are the supreme conspirators, seeking to bring about global rule by the capitalist elite. There will be no governments, no nation-states, no trades unions, no human and civil rights, no welfare, no help for anyone down on their luck, no public education system beyond that required to produce drones for capitalist offices and factories, no public health service, no public pensions. The capitalist elite will rule every aspect of life, and the police and army will be there purely to serve them and oppress everyone else. Is that what you want?!

First Jobs Parents traditionally help their children to get their first jobs. Why is this the parents’ responsibility? Why doesn’t the State give everyone their first job? Why isn’t the State trying to get to know all of its citizens and put them in the best jobs for both them and the State? This is what would happen in a positive liberty Meritocratic Republic. A State’s most precious resource is its smartest and most creative citizens. A State will succeed to the extent that it harnesses the gifts of these people. In a free-market capitalist system, whether this vital resource succeeds or fails is left entirely to the family and irrational “market forces”. That’s a scandal. What a waste of priceless human intelligence.

The 9/11 Theory No 9/11 conspiracy theorist says anything at all about radical Islam and its hatred of the West (and of Israel and America in particular). These conspiracy theorists have no interest at all in Islamic fundamentalism. The target of their hatred is the American government, not Islam, so the government gets blamed for everything and Islam for nothing. The West has been at war with Islam since the Muslims invaded and conquered Spain and Portugal in the early 700s. The Christian “Reconquest” (Reconquista) then went on for over seven bitter centuries, with Muslim rule not finally ending until 1492. The Americans, with their total lack of historical knowledge of anything beyond the borders of their own country and prior to the formation of

modern America, are entirely oblivious to this. They know nothing of the Battle of Tours/Poitiers that saved Europe (and thus America!) from being Muslim: “But for their defeat by Charles Martel in the Battle of Tours in 733, the entire Western world might today be Muslim.” – Huston Smith “The more powerful Muslims and the spread of Islam were knocking on Europe’s door. And the spread of Islam was stopped along the road between the towns of Tours and Poitiers, France, with just its head in Europe.” – Robert Payne “Had the Muslims been victorious at Tours, it is difficult to suppose what population in Europe could have organized to resist them.” – Paul Davis The Americans know nothing of the series of Crusades against Islamic power in the Middle East: First Crusade (1095–1099) People’s Crusade (1096) Second Crusade (1147–1149) Third Crusade (1187–1192) German Crusade (1195–1198) Fourth Crusade (1202–1204) Fifth Crusade (1217–1221) Sixth Crusade (1228–1229) Seventh Crusade (1248–1254) Eighth and Ninth Crusades (1270–1272) They know nothing of the Islamic conquest of Constantinople in 1453 by the Ottoman Empire under Mehmed II, ending the Roman Empire once and for all. They know nothing of the Ottoman Empire conquering huge swathes of Eastern Europe, getting as far as Vienna and thus almost conquering the West itself. They know nothing of the Siege of Vienna in 1529 when the Ottoman Empire, led by Suleiman the Magnificent, tried to capture this strategically

vital city at the heart of European affairs. They know nothing of the great Battle of Vienna of 1683 when the Muslim hordes were once again repelled at the door to the West. No, for American conspiracy theorists, it’s all about their government. Morons! Anyone with any grasp of history knows exactly who was responsible for 9/11. If you’re a complete ignoramus, you can imagine the most preposterous alternatives. Nothing can part fools from their delusions.

Equality? The universe is not about equality. This is a universe of unequal outcomes. Get with the program. We need a system that mandates equal opportunities (meritocracy as opposed to capitalist democracy) but one that does not mandate artificial equal outcomes (communism).

The Problem “And if Antichrist is like Christ, Christ, I suppose, is like Antichrist.” – Cardinal Newman If the False God pretends to be the True God, how do believers know the difference? What rational criteria do they use? Would they like to tell us? Surely they don’t believe someone is God just because he says so. If some verses of the Koran were allegedly removed because they were authored by Satan, why can’t it be said that these were in fact the only good verses, and all the rest were the true Satanic verses? Satan is called the “Father of Lies”. Why isn’t his ultimate lie that he’s God? When “God” ordered Abraham to murder his own son to please him, why is that regarded as self-evidently “Godly” rather than self-evidently Satanic? Who decides?

Truth Fashion “Most of the change we think we see in life is due to truths being in and out of favour.” – Robert Frost Such truths aren’t true at all. They’re just interpretations.

Cult Success What is a successful cult called? – a religion.

What is an unsuccessful cult called? – lunatics.

The Study of Religion Religions should be studied from several perspectives: 1) As gangs 2) As tribes 3) As capitalist corporations 4) As cults 5) As viruses 6) As collective mental illness 7) As a phenomenon of extraverted, sensing and feeling types 8) As hatred of reason 9) As the primary vehicle for psychopathic narcissists to control the masses

***** In Judaism, Moses heard the voice of God talking to him from a bush (!). In Islam, Allah is the alter ego of the prophet Mohammed. In Christianity, Jesus Christ is prophet, Messiah and God all rolled into one.

***** Conspiracy theories have all the same characteristics as religions, with the exception that they do not refer to the afterlife. The leading conspiracy theorists are the new generation of mad prophets.

Monotheism Akhenaten, the heretic Pharaoh, was the true founder of Monotheism (or the monotheistic tendency). However, he did not receive the popular support of the people or priest caste, who remained loyal to the old gods. The Jews took Akhenaten’s fierce devotion to a single God and applied it to their war god – Yahweh – and thus the catastrophe of Abrahamism was born: the

worship of a violent, partisan psychopath as the alleged Creator of the Universe.

The Positive Liberty War All sacred causes involve positive liberty. Negative liberty is the cause of oneself and is never sacred. Most right wingers endorse negative liberty, especially in the economic sphere (with free-market capitalism being the quintessence of negative liberty). However, right wingers do embrace positive liberty in one regard: religion. You will find right wingers promoting free-market capitalism, the “small” State and minimal government (negative liberty) while also being fundamentalist Christians (positive liberty). These people always talk about “freedom”, “choice”, and government staying out of their business, yet when it comes to “morals” and “sin” then suddenly no one has any choice or freedom and right wingers want to see Christian Fundamentalist values imposed on the world and everyone to be made to read and revere the Bible. Right wing negative libertarians hate government laws, commandments, rules, regulations, restrictions and prohibitions, yet readily welcome all of these in the context of religion. Jews are the supreme free-market capitalists and also those most obsessed with religious control, obeying some 620 Judaic commandments. Right wingers despise socialism because it’s about government and State positive liberty. Here we see the great, defining clash of history. All positive liberty States (whether Spartan, Athenian, Theban, Corinthian, Roman, Jacobin, socialist, fascist, communist, Nazi or meritocratic) are a direct threat to negative libertarian ideologies such as free-market capitalism, and, frequently, a direct threat to positive liberty religion. Communism was atheist and Nazism was pagan and both despised Abrahamism. There are six key areas in human life: 1) Politics and Philosophy 2) Economics 3) Religion 4) Psychology

5) Sociology 6) Mathematics, Science and Technology All of these can express positive or negative liberty. Conflict erupts whenever positive liberty systems clash with negative liberty systems (such as communism versus capitalism), or when rival positive liberty systems clash (such as Nazism versus Judaism), or rival negative liberty systems clash (such as right wing anarchy versus left wing anarchy). The world is driven by the dialectical struggle between different positive and negative liberty ideologies. Communism is an all-consuming positive liberty system that defines not only politics and philosophy but also economics, religion, psychology, sociology and science and technology. Islam is an all-consuming religious positive liberty system that defines every aspect of Muslim life. Communism and Islam can never not be in conflict – as was seen most vividly in the Afghan War when the jihadists fought fanatically against the occupying Soviet Army. Free-market capitalism dominates the economic arena directly and then indirectly controls politics and philosophy (via capitalist “democracy”), psychology, sociology and science and technology. The only area where it stays clear (to an extent) is religion. Most capitalists are Christians even though Christianity and capitalism couldn’t be more contradictory given that Christianity is, in effect, religious communism, but Christian capitalists (especially Protestants) are superb at compartmentalising their lives and practising outright hypocrisy and Orwellian doublethink. They suffer from remarkably little cognitive dissonance when they aspire to be as rich as possible despite hearing from Jesus Christ that the rich should give up everything they own if they want to get into heaven. Jewish atheist Ayn Rand was the ultimate and most consistent freemarket capitalist because she made free-market capitalism into a positive liberty doctrine, a sacred cause, every bit as all-consuming as communism. She preached the “virtue of selfishness” and sought to promote absolute self-interest as the supreme, rational sacred cause. She wanted to eradicate religion entirely. So persuasive was she that many American capitalists are both Randians and Christian Fundamentalists even though, from either perspective, this is an absolute contradiction. Then again, reason, consistency and lack of hypocrisy are rarely found in any Christian.

The Complex Masters suffer from a superiority complex and slaves from an inferiority complex. We need to eradicate both types of complex.

Co-dependency “A learned behaviour that can be passed down from one generation to another. It is an emotional and behavioural condition that affects an individual’s ability to have a healthy, mutually satisfying relationship. It is also known as ‘relationship addiction’ because people with codependency often form or maintain relationships that are one-sided, emotionally destructive and/or abusive.” – National Mental Health Association Religion is all about co-dependency. The masses, suffering from a devastating inferiority complex, associate themselves with a “God” suffering from the worst possible superiority complex. They do so to such an extent that, like Abraham, they are willing to kill their own children to please their God. All mainstream religions reflect severe mental illness and are fundamentally sado-masochistic, especially Abrahamism.

***** Conspiracy theorists have a codependency relationship with the conspiracy theories to which the subscribe. They never abandon them no matter how much they are debunked and ridiculed.

Inverted Narcissism Narcissists think only of themselves. Inverted narcissists think only of narcissists, and never of themselves. They are the codependents of narcissists. Gods, prophets, priests, gurus, rabbis and imams are always narcissists and their followers are always inverted narcissists who would do anything for them, even sacrificing their own lives (martyrdom) as the supreme token of their love and devotion. Inverted narcissists are self-brainwashing. They want their relationship with their chosen narcissist to be as difficult as possible so that they can prove their love to the extremest degree. They brainwash themselves to accept the worst possible treatment and they justify this on the basis of the

strength of their faith. No rational person could look at the story of Abraham and Isaac/Ishmael with anything other than revulsion. Yet, to an inverted narcissist, such a sick, disgusting and unthinkable tale makes perfect sense. It involves the ultimate demonstration of inverted narcissism – killing the thing you most love in this world to show “God” that you love him even more. That’s the basis of “honour” killings. Inverted narcissists must never exhibit any doubts. They must have absolute faith in the narcissist they worship. Inverted narcissists are addicted to self-hate, relieved only by doing the bidding of the monster that preys on them. Most human beings are addicted to Satan. None of them are addicted to the True God. In many ways, Jesus Christ can be depicted as an inverted narcissist, mindlessly and slavishly serving the cosmic narcissist Jehovah, even to the extent of getting himself martyred on a cross to show his love and obedience. Christianity is such a powerful religion because it presents “God” as both a narcissist (Jehovah) and inverted narcissist (Jesus), hence covers the two bases that most define the human condition.

Islam: The Mad Religion “And (the Jinn who had listened to the Koran said): We had sought the heaven but had found it filled with strong warders and meteors.” – Koran 72:8 (Jinn stand on each other’s shoulders to eavesdrop on the “Exalted Company” in heaven; heaven’s guards shoot them down with meteors [shooting stars] ... yes, this is all factual according to the “infallible” Koran.) “The first heaven was of pure silver and the stars suspended from its vault by chains of gold; in each one an angel lay awake to prevent the demons from climbing into the holy dwelling places and the spirits from listening indiscreetly to celestial secrets.” – Muhammad Husayn Haykal “The Lord of the heavens and the earth and what is between them, and Lord of the easts. Surely We have adorned the nearest heaven with an adornment, the stars, And (there is) a safeguard against every rebellious Shaitan. They cannot listen to the exalted assembly and they are thrown at from every side, Being driven off, and for them is a perpetual chastisement, Except him

who snatches off but once, then there follows him a brightly shining flame.” – Koran 37:5-10 The Koran reflects the Ptolemaic cosmology of the time it was written, now wholly refuted. It even has pre-Ptolemaic elements, including a flat earth! The Koran is a completely false text since it claims to be the infallible Word of God and yet it is 100% wrong about cosmology. The stars are depicted as warders or guards of heaven, keeping out jinn and Shaitans, and driving them away by launching shooting stars at them. Total anti-scientific nonsense. It’s remarkable that no religious text has ever provided anything like a true account of the cosmos. Why not? Because all of these texts were composed by mortal men who didn’t know anything more than the rudimentary speculations of their time. God certainly didn’t write them. If he did, he’s no God. Here’s a note to all religious maniacs: if the Koran, Bible, Torah or any other holy text had contained a section describing quantum mechanics thousands of years before such a thing was known, it would of course have been miraculous and divine. However, as you would expect, no religious text ever dared to mention science, mathematics or metaphysics. All they did was tell stories and issue threats. The Koran was written by a total narcissist on a vast ego trip, having the impertinence to say he was God’s mouthpiece. “Muhammad had built a personality cult around him. He was the personification of his god. Obedience to him was obedience to Allah and disobeying him was disobeying Allah. This is everything a narcissistic psychopath craves for – to be God incarnate. Muhammad manipulated everyone until he ascended to the throne of Allah and became the de facto God. ... He recognized no rights for others. Everyone had to submit to his will or perish. His decisions were God’s decisions and disobeying him was regarded as disobeying God. He did not present logical arguments to support his claim, but issued ultimatums and threats. He demanded that his followers abandon their own will and submit to him completely and unhesitatingly. He expected others to fight for him, sacrifice their comfort, wealth, and life. As far as he was concerned he had the last word and no one was allowed to express an opinion contrary to his. ... Fear is the most primitive and the most effective way to make others do your bidding. ...

Islam is nothing but infernophobia. Muslims are victims and victimizers at once. ... Muslims are psychological hostages of a seventh century psychopath. Although dead and his corpse turned to dust, Muhammad’s lies still entrap and still produce victims. Muslims collectively suffer from low self esteem. ... When one submits to a demonic god one becomes a devil.” – Ali Sina The most bizarre feature of the Koran is that it is about monotheism and yet Allah is frequently referred to as “We” (e.g. “And if you are in doubt as to that which We have revealed to Our servant, then produce a chapter like it and call on your witnesses besides Allah if you are truthful.” – Koran 2:23). Is “We” Allah and the Angel Gabriel? But that would put Gabriel, a mere messenger, on a par with Allah. In fact, what’s truly being revealed is that Allah and the prophet Mohammed are one and the same. “Allah” is simply Mohammed’s alter ego, and so, throughout the Koran, both are talking to the world with one voice. It’s their “collaboration”. Of course, what’s really going on is that a lunatic is claiming to be God. If you ever taken the trouble to read the Koran, you quickly see that it’s the most infantile and moronic holy text of all time. In fact, it’s precisely what you would expect a self-deluded, irrational, narcissistic, illiterate ignoramus to fabricate. It’s no surprise that the vast majority of Muslims are themselves illiterate and lacking in any education. That’s why they love Mohammed so much. He’s one of their own, a fellow ‘tard, speaking in the universal language of the mentally backward. Go on, read a few verses of the Koran. They’re hilarious. If “God” authored them, God help us all. All prophets are simply madmen who claim to speak for God. Of course, they are just narcissists speaking for themselves and recruiting inverted narcissists who are too stupid and masochistic to know any better. To understand how dumb Muslims are, just look at them. Look at how primitive their nations are, how unenlightened, how anti-scientific. Look at what they’re wearing, especially the women. What you are looking at is the uniform of the moron, of the fanatic who despises reason and who will never in this lifetime have even one rational thought. Such is the tragedy of Islam and the whole world, which has to put up with it. It’s time for all intelligent people to say, “Enough is enough. We must devise the Final Solution for this religious plague, this deadly, mindeating virus.”

Morality cannot be extended to those who cannot think. Muslims are no more moral than dogs or pigs. Mohammed is one of the most evil men of all time. He took the religion of the Devil (Judaism) and made it even more Satanic! No wonder Dante depicted him in hell – where he surely belongs.

***** In Understanding Muhammad and Muslims, Ali Sina persuasively likens Mohammed to the cult leader Jim Jones and the “holy” city of Medina to Jonestown – an oppressive, terrifying, intimidating, brainwashed city of extremist cultists, willing to kill and die for their cult master. A very simple question arises regarding Islam. Why was a selfproclaimed religion of peace instantly so violent? Muslim Arabs immediately went on a huge, violent rampage across the Middle East, the Far East, North Africa and Europe. Ali Sina gives an obvious answer: the Muslims had no education and no culture, and their economy collapsed when the Jews and Christians who had propped it up left to escape Islam. So, the Muslims were compelled to become violent brigands, robbers, thieves, looters, rapists and mass murderers, enslaving huge numbers of victims, putting vast numbers to the sword and force-converting others. All of this stemmed from the beliefs of the deranged psychopath Mohammed. To this day, Muslims have achieved nothing of note in their own right. Any intellectual accomplishments attributed to Muslims actually came from Islamic exposure to ancient Greek and Indian culture. The Muslims themselves have never created anything of worth. To become a Muslim is to despise reason and the whole human race. “The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd; indeed in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widespread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible.” – Bertrand Russell “Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.” – Elbert Hubbard “When your life depends on believing, you will believe in anything.” – Ali Sina “Believers abandon reason. This is the nature of faith.” – Ali Sina

“Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully, as when they do it from religious conviction.” – Pascal

***** Why does no mainstream politician ever criticise Islam? Why does no mainstream TV programme, newspaper or magazine ever ridicule all of the central claims of Islam? So much for free speech, a free press and freedom of expression.

Global Islamic Jihad Reject your family and friends if they reject the Koran: “O you who have believed, do not take your fathers or your brothers as allies if they have preferred disbelief over belief. And whoever does so among you – then it is those who are the wrongdoers.” – Koran 9:23 Fight the infidels: “Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture – [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.” – Koran 9:29 Wage jihad and be hard and harsh (i.e. show no mercy: kill them). “Fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you, and let them find harshness in you.” – Koran 9:123 Murder apostates: “But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever you find them.” – Koran 4:89

***** The politically correct would no doubt accuse us of engaging in Islamophobic hate speech. In fact, it’s free speech! Moreover, Islam itself is the biggest hate speech of all time, a blood-curdling hymn of hate and murder against all non-Muslims (the “infidels”). Just read the Koran. Just study Islamic history. Just look at Islam today. Any politically correct

person who defends Islam is a hate speaker, a tolerator of unacceptable intolerance. Islam is a not a private religion. It’s a public way of life, a political system (a theocracy), a legal system (Sharia Law, the Law mandated by the Koran), an economic system (anti-usury), a cultural system, an anti-art system, an anti-education system (no one needs any book except the Koran), an anti-science system (science and the Koran are 100% incompatible), an anti-women system, an anti-gay system, an antifreethinker system (everyone must think Koranically). It’s the greatest threat there has ever been to human freedom, dignity, freethinking, progress, science and human and civil rights. Any government that does not criminalise it is itself criminal and will in due course be swallowed by the monster it has allowed to grow in its midst. There are some things that are indefensible, and Islam is foremost amongst them. It must perish. It must vanish back into the desert as if it were no more than an evil genie that some foolish person released from its bottle. We must put it back it and ensure the bottle is buried forever. Satan will never again be loosed amongst us.

The Psychopaths Abraham, the “first Muslim” – the first psychopath. Mohammed, the “Seal of Prophets” – the supreme psychopath. Islam = the Slave Contract. Islam = Submission.

Jerusalem Jerusalem is the City of Sin, the City of the Devil, the Capital of Hell. Jerusalem must Fall. The Temple Mount must be levelled. Mount Moriah must be blown up forever. Only then will humanity live.

Salt Lot’s wife was turned into a pillar of salt because she disobeyed “God” by daring to look back at the destruction of Sodom. What’s the message? – the penalty is death for disobeying God. Does that make him God or a slavemaster? Who would ever want a God like that?

Sacrifice Ancient religions sacrificed animals and even humans to their gods. Abrahamism was also a religion of human sacrifice, as we see in the tale of Abraham and Isaac, of Abraham driving Hagar and Ishmael into the wilderness, of Jephtha and his daughter, of the firstborn of Egypt. Even today, Jews and Muslims sacrifice animals. Why don’t Animal Rights Terrorists blow up synagogues and mosques rather than attacking scientists? Anyway, would any God require any kind of sacrifice? What kind of God requires the shedding of blood? Isn’t that what’s expected of the Devil?

The Parting of the Red Sea Right, imagine yourself as the Egyptian Pharaoh during the Exodus. Your country has just suffered ten devastating plagues, culminating with the death of all the firstborn (including your own son); a miraculous fiery pillar has defended the Jews from your army and the Red Sea has parted for them right in front of your eyes, then destroyed all of your soldiers. Er, why haven’t you started worshipping the Jewish God? You’d be insane not to. Plainly, no such events ever happened. They are outrageous Jewish lies. Like their entire Bible! “All this was inspired by the principle – which is quite true in itself – that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.” – Hitler

Eternal Truth Only eternal truths of reason constitute absolute, infallible knowledge. Everything else is interpretation. Eternal truths of reason are one and the same as the eternal laws of mathematics. These comprise the immutable, indestructible, flawless, infallible, perfect, complete, full and consistent

foundations of existence (static ontology – being – in a loose manner of speaking). It is within this framework that the dynamic, dialectical ontology of becoming takes place. Strictly speaking, there is nothing but becoming, but since this becoming occurs in a lawful, mathematical, unchaotic way, it gives rise to unchanging, eternal laws.

The Mind of God “God” is ontological mathematics, the source of eternal existence. If we were to personalise it, we would call it Abraxas, the Gnostic God of Absolute Reason. Or we might refer to the ancient Greek God Apollo. Ontological reason and ontological mathematics are one and the same thing. The eternal truths of reason are the laws of mathematics. These are the “thoughts of God.” These truths and laws constitute the Mind of God. We and the universe exist within this Mind. It’s the container for everything. The universe is first and foremost mathematical. It can then be described as mental, by which we mean that existence is fundamentally dimensionless, immaterial and takes place outside space and time. The dimensional, material world of space and time is possible thanks purely to Fourier mathematics which can represent mental frequency functions as material spacetime functions. The material world is just a mathematical construct, transform or projection of an underlying mental world. There is nothing but mathematics.

The Answer to Everything? According to free-market capitalists, the irrational market guided by the “invisible hand” (of selfishness) is more knowledgeable, efficient and effective than anything else. According to scientific materialism, the experimental method based on the human senses is the best means of accumulating authentic knowledge. According to religion, faith (feelings), mysticism (intuition), revelation, prophets, gurus and Messiahs are the best way to gain knowledge of true reality. Of course, all of these are false. Reason alone reveals the eternal truth. Humanity has been led down the totally wrong path by religion, scientific materialism and capitalism.

Humanity’s greatest treasure is its most rational geniuses: thinkers such as Pythagoras, Plato, Descartes, Leibniz, Euler, Gauss, Fourier, Riemann, Gödel and Turing. Should the world be run by irrational markets (self-interest), irrational religions (feelings and intuitions), the irrational senses (science) or rationalism (ontological mathematics)? Humanity’s tragedy is that it has always preferred the irrational. Nevertheless, reason is sure to prove victorious in the end.

Greed is Good? From Wall Street (Oliver Stone) Gordon Gekko: The richest one percent of this country owns half our country’s wealth, five trillion dollars. One third of that comes from hard work, two thirds comes from inheritance, interest on interest accumulating to widows and idiot sons and what I do, stock and real estate speculation. It’s bullshit. You got ninety percent of the American public out there with little or no net worth. I create nothing. I own. We make the rules, pal. The news, war, peace, famine, upheaval, the price per paper clip. We pick that rabbit out of the hat while everybody sits out there wondering how the hell we did it. Now you’re not naive enough to think we’re living in a democracy, are you buddy? It’s the free market. And you’re a part of it. You’ve got that killer instinct. Stick around pal, I’ve still got a lot to teach you. Gordon Gekko: The new law of evolution in corporate America seems to be survival of the unfittest. Well, in my book you either do it right or you get eliminated. ... I am not a destroyer of companies. I am a liberator of them! The point is, ladies and gentleman, that greed, for lack of a better word, is good. Greed is right, greed works. Greed clarifies, cuts through, and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit. Greed, in all of its forms; greed for life, for money, for love, knowledge has marked the upward surge of mankind. And greed, you mark my words, will not only save Teldar Paper, but that other malfunctioning corporation called the USA. Thank you very much.

*****

Gordon Gekko is a modern John Galt (of Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged). He espouses exactly the same ideology – the “virtue” and “efficiency” of greed, selfishness and narcissism. It’s a sad and desperate world where greed, selfishness and narcissism are the motive power. These are the triple drivers of free-market capitalism and anarcho-capitalist libertarianism. What is required is a world driven by rationalism and the pursuit of rational perfection for the whole human race. It’s rationalism that delivered philosophy, mathematics, science and technology – Logos. It’s meritocratic rationalism that stands at the heart of the Star Trek vision of the future, not greed, selfishness and narcissism. Gordon Gekko made himself extremely rich. He delivered nothing at all of worth to the human race. That’s the quintessence of free-market capitalism – the junk generator for enriching the elite.

The Revolutionary Equation The workers are always in oversupply, so their wages always go down. This effect is being enormously magnified by the internet economy and by globalisation. Cheap foreign workers can flood in from all over the world, or whole businesses can be transferred to cheap countries, to wherever profit is maximised for the rich. The elite, however, ensure that they are always in short supply, and their price is always going up. That’s capitalism, of course – the law of supply and demand. It’s also the law of Revolution. Once the rich have taken too much – and they always do since it’s in their nature and it’s the core logic of capitalism – the poor will have no option to fight. Then we will have our Revolution. The time is getting very near. Prepare for War.

Cowardice It’s staggering how many fools believe that enlightenment is connected with “unconditional love, light and peace”. In fact, enlightenment is all about reason and reason alone. It concerns intelligence, not feelings. Plenty of feeling types will simply never be enlightened. They are not capable of being enlightened. Nothing is worse – more feeble, weak and pathetic – than pacifism and submissiveness in the face of extremist evil. Islam, Judaism, Christianity

and Karmism must be eradicated from this world before humanity can evolve to its appointed level. All those who refuse to contribute to the Final Solution to the problem of ancient, decrepit, unenlightened, evil religions are as bad and unenlightened as the disease itself. We are not passive, we are not pacifists, we are not submissives, we are not weak, we are not pathetic, we are not apathetic.

Existence Existence is about one thing alone – aligning your mind with the eternal laws of mathematics so that you are then all-knowing, all-seeing and allpowerful: you have become God. Illuminism is dialectically guaranteed to eliminate traditional religions. Why? Well, there are three reasons: 1) We are 100% right and they are 100% wrong, 2) When the smartest people in the world decide to take over, nothing can stop them, just as chimpanzees could do nothing to prevent the rise of Homo sapiens, and 3) We are the real Homo sapiens: Abrahamists and Karmists are beasts: apes.

Reality What you believe about reality is entirely conditioned by your personality type and intelligence. We would be in a Nietzschean domain of pure interpretation and Will to Power were it not for one thing – the eternal truths of reason of mathematics. Plato knew that to distinguish absolute truth from opinion and interpretation, there had to be something that transcended the contingent, fallible human condition. Thus he proposed his domain of perfect, immutable, eternal Forms. He had exactly the right idea but, sadly, went too far, treating inherently subjective things such as love, beauty, good and justice as objective truths. In fact, the only valid Platonic domain – the only domain that does offer unarguable, infallible, eternal knowledge – is that of ontological mathematics. Wittgenstein committed the supreme error when he said that mathematics was mere tautology and had nothing to say about the world. In fact, “mere” mathematical tautology is the only thing that can be unambiguously stated about the world. We inhabit a 100% mathematical universe. Yet mathematics has a key property that makes the world seem

anything other than mathematical. Namely, you can use mathematics to create non-mathematical languages. Take the subject of gematria. In essence, this involves assigning letters to numbers (e.g. a = 1, b = 2, c =3, and so on) and then giving whole words numbers (by adding their component letter-numbers) and then linking words that have the same numerical value and attributing some shared coded cosmic meaning to them. So, “mystics” take numbers, associate then with letters and then produce an absurd system that has nothing at all to do with eternal mathematics and its eternal laws. Gematria is wholly subjective, interpretative and contingent. What is science? It’s based on a sensory interpretation of mathematics. If you can’t observe something, say the scientists, it doesn’t exist. They then madly posit an unreal, unobservable abstract mathematical quantum mechanical wavefunction as the basis of reality. This irrationalism is exactly what happens when ontological mathematics gets reinterpreted in some other language such as scientific materialism. Science is better than religion because it has a much stronger relationship with mathematics. Unfortunately, scientists still haven’t grasped that mathematics itself, not science and the ludicrous human senses, is the eternal truth of the world. Music is another archetypal reinterpretation of mathematics in another language. Music is wondrous, but it does not directly reflect the eternal truths of mathematics. It’s mathematics for the ears and the emotions.

The Libertarians “Slavery is now nowhere more patiently endured, than in countries once inhabited by the zealots of liberty.” – Dr Samuel Johnson (1758) “How is it that we hear the loudest yelps for liberty among the drivers of negroes?” – Dr Samuel Johnson Libertarians believe they should be free to enslave others. They believe in absolute liberty for themselves, but not for others. They are freedom’s deadliest enemies.

Self

Our sense of self is located in the left hemisphere of the brain, connected with logic, reason, language, the senses and localism. Our sense of “other” is located in the right hemisphere, associated with feelings, intuition, the unconscious, the oceanic, the non-local. This mysterious “other” can often be interpreted as another being, a much vaster being – even as God. People who are highly emotional or intuitive are much more religious and spiritual than those locked into their left brains, who are more likely to be atheists or hedonists. INTJ and INTPs are interesting cases because they are strongly leftbrain oriented via their thinking faculty and yet strongly right-brained via their intuition. They are far more likely to be religious or spiritual than “ST” types (scientists). Ontological mathematics is “NT” and scientific materialism “ST”. NTs are drawn to eternal truths of reason, and STs to contingent truths of fact.

The Saturnalia Campaign Let’s get rid of Christmas. Let’s return to the pagan Saturnalia, which Christmas hijacked.

North Korean Poppy Day Let’s hear no more talk of North Korean totalitarianism. Just look at Britain on Remembrance Sunday and Armistice Day. The whole population subscribes to the jingoistic outpourings of the ruling regime. Supermarkets come to a halt. People stop in their tracks in railway stations. Announcements are made in public libraries demanding total compliance with and submission to the Orwellian two-minute silence (two-minute hate of Britain’s enemies?). Everyone on TV wears a poppy. Not a single dissenting voice is aired. We have wholesale conformism and groupthink. No one is permitted to oppose the militaristic juggernaut. The ruling elite achieve full spectrum dominance and saturation coverage. Young children are cynically groomed to worship the military. If Remembrance Day is so important, why isn’t it a public holiday so that people can “remember” all day long? Because that would upset capitalist employers and would be too much like an actual serious commitment. So, “remembrance” is reduced to a two-minute simulation of

remembrance, just as Christmas is a two-minute simulation of Christianity while everyone gets on with the real task of capitalist gorging. Here’s a challenge to all supporters of Poppy Day. Let’s have a ceremony involving all of the same people, but without uniforms, marching and formal wear. If Poppy Day is simply about remembrance then why are uniforms and marching necessary? The people involved look like they are going to war – that they are perpetuating war – not remembering the dead and the horrors of war. Or let’s have Wilfred Owen’s poems Futility, Anthem for Doomed Youth and Dulce et Decorum Est read out by the Queen and Prime Minister at the Cenotaph. Let’s show pictures of the dead, of the mutilated, of the endless collateral damage. But we mustn’t actually show what war is about – the slaughterbench – must we? We must maintain the sanitized, phoney, fraudulent, militaristic propaganda of the right-wing ruling establishment: “The old Lie; Dulce et Decorum est Pro patria mori.” – Wilfred Owen

***** On Poppy Day, we get nothing but Dulce et Decorum est Pro patria mori – the absolute opposite of the remembrance of the nightmare of war. We get the militaristic glorification of war by the old soldiers with tears in their eyes and their glinting medals on their chests.

“The Banality of Evil” “The trouble with a Nazi criminal like Eichmann was that he insisted on renouncing all personal qualities, as if there was nobody left to be either punished or forgiven. He protested time and again, contrary to the Prosecution’s assertions, that he had never done anything out of his own initiative, that he had no intentions whatsoever, good or bad, that he had only obeyed orders. This typical Nazi plea makes it clear that the greatest evil in the world is the evil committed by nobodies. Evil committed by men without motive, without convictions, without wicked hearts or demonic wills, by human beings who refuse to be persons. And it is this phenomenon that I have called the ‘banality of evil’.” – Hannah Arendt

“The sad truth is that most evil is done by people who never make up their minds to be good or evil.” – Hannah Arendt

The Banality of Good Hannah Arendt claimed that evil could never be both banal and radical, only banal and extreme. She insisted that only good could be banal and radical. What nonsense. Good is every bit as banal and extreme as evil. How could it be any different? They are the mirror images of each other. When the masses stand still for two minutes on Poppy Day, they are proving yet again how staggeringly banal “good” is. And extreme too – everyone has to take part or receive the most withering looks of disapproval. Only ideas are radical. Feelings are always banal and/or extreme. Look at the Muslims on their knees to their God, or the bobbing Jews at their Wailing Wall – banal and extreme in equal measure; not a single radical thing about them. If the Jews or Muslims stopped what they were doing and yelled, “Fuck Jehovah” and “Fuck Allah”, respectively, that would be the radical. But we know that’s never going to happen.

***** Why is evil so banal? It’s because it’s always about self-interest, and there’s nothing more banal than that. Arendt, in her writings regarding Adolf Eichmann, was hopelessly wrong. She claimed that evil was bureaucratic rather than about pure self-interest. She claimed that Eichmann wasn’t motivated by any particular animus against the Jews but was “only obeying orders”, hence was somehow exonerated from the accusation of selfinterest, i.e. from doing something that he found personally motivating. Yet of course Eichmann was self-interested in his actions. Had he not obeyed his orders, he would have been demoted, disciplined or even killed. He would have lost his status and influence. His power would have vanished in an instant. So, he did what he did out of nothing but self-interest. People often say they would do “anything” for their family. Well, can you imagine a father disobeying an order and getting himself executed and his family put in a concentration camp? (Eichmann was married with children). How would that be helping his family? Self-interest mandates that you obey orders. It mandates that you put others down, that you pursue privilege and inheritance, that you try to secure every advantage over others

that you possibly can. If obeying orders helps your personal cause, obey. If disobeying orders harms your personal cause, obey. Either way, obey. People do appalling things because it gives them what they want. No one does evil for no reason, which is essentially the ludicrous charge that Arendt made against Eichmann. She claimed that he was some kind of nonthinking functionary, a robot. He was nothing of the kind. He was a man calculating his self-interest at all times, exactly like everyone else, and about 99.9% of the human race would have done exactly the same as Eichmann in his shoes. To hang Eichmann was like hanging the whole human race!

***** Arendt rightly highlighted the incredible complicity between Jewish community leaders and the Nazis and she said that far fewer Jews would have died were it not for this cooperation. There are a couple of points to make here. Firstly, leadership is always efficient compared with anarchy. In an anarchy, no one would ever get anything done. For good or ill, leadership produces results. Anarchy doesn’t. Anarchy simply creates a power vacuum into which leadership will inevitably step, usually with extreme violence. Secondly, the Jewish leaders, like Eichmann, were operating through pure self-interest. They helped themselves and those closest to them and let others die. Why weren’t they hanged beside Eichmann? After all, they were all obeying orders, and they were all acting under duress and would have made different choices otherwise. Eichmann didn’t choose to transport Jews to concentration camps. He simply accepted the rules of the world he found himself in and acted accordingly, exactly as the Jewish leaders did. There is no moral difference between them. If Eichmann was guilty, so was every Jewish leader that cooperated with the Nazis (and a vast number did). But, of course, the Jews that tried Eichmann had no interest in morality or justice, simply in revenge, punishment and propaganda. Like Eichmann, they obeyed their orders and did exactly what was expected of them by their superiors. Unlike Eichmann, they actively enjoyed it, and that makes them even less moral than the man they hanged.

The First Eichmann

Hannah Arendt depicted Eichmann as a non-person, as someone who didn’t think. He made himself a machine, she claimed, and mechanically obeyed his orders. He lacked intentionality, agency. He could just as easily have been transporting tins of beans to the concentration camps as Jews about to be exterminated. It made no difference to him. In fact, this argument stands as a complete defence of Eichmann since it proves that he wasn’t doing anything immoral. He had no moral culpability at all since he recognised no moral dimension to what he was doing. He had no desire to kill Jews. The fact that Jews died was not his doing. He himself didn’t personally kill a single Jew. Others, obeying their orders in their turn, did the killing, and they too weren’t violating any morality either since they too were not choosing to do evil by their own volition. To do evil means to actively do what you know to be wrong, and thus it’s hard to think of anyone in history who has ever done “evil”. In fact, it’s impossible. No one ever thinks that what they do cannot be justified. Even serial killers would be able to give themselves a pretext for their actions, even if these reasons were unconvincing to everyone else. When a voice in Abraham’s head told him to make a human sacrifice of his son, did he argue with God, did he wrestle with his conscience? No, exactly like Eichmann, he simply obeyed his orders, slavishly, mechanically, unthinkingly, without question, without intentionality, without agency, without accountability. Abraham, the first Jew, was morally identical to Eichmann. In fact, he was the first Eichmann. When Israel hanged Eichmann, it was hanging Abraham, the Patriarch of the Jews (and thus the whole of Jewry), and surely Abraham was a man that fully deserved to be hanged. What kind of monstrous father would murder his own son because someone ordered it? When the Jews hanged Eichmann, they were convicting and hanging themselves. They had found themselves and their evil religion guilty on the world stage, and worthy of the death penalty. In fact, in a horrific way, they legitimised the Holocaust. They said it was absolutely right that people should be killed just because the State said so, and for no real, authentic reason. After all, every Jewish leader who talked to the Nazis could have been executed for treason and crimes against humanity for “only obeying orders”, just as Eichmann was. All Jews are Eichmanns. All Abrahamists are Eichmanns. The Jewish Bible is full of Jews slavishly committing atrocities sanctioned by their

“God”. Eichmann is Everyman when it comes to mainstream religion. Religious maniacs always obey orders without question and always think they are doing right. That is the true banality of evil. It’s a tragedy that Arendt, a Jew, didn’t tell that story. As it was, she was denounced by countless Jews for “defending” Eichmann and denouncing the Jewish leaders who conspired with the Nazis. As ever, all parties were acting out of pure self-interest, and morality never entered into it anywhere. It never does.

Dumbocracy Ancient Athenian Democracy: the people seized power from the rich. Modern Capitalist “Democracy”: rich capitalists seized power from the people. How dare capitalists call themselves democrats? The ancient Athenians would not recognise capitalist democracy as any kind of democracy. In capitalist democracy, all of the power lies not with elected governments but with an unelected, unaccountable “market” – which is actually a rich man’s cartel for promoting the interests of banks, corporations and the super rich. People have no say over the market and yet their economic fate is entirely decided by the market. People really are dumb if they haven’t worked out that true democracy means having a vote over every aspect of society, especially the economy. The ancient Athenian democrats despised the rich being in charge and took action to stop it. Modern capitalist democracy is all about ensuring that the rich stay in charge while pretending that the people have a say over things via futile elections that change nothing other than the face of the particular puppet masquerading as “President”. Isn’t it time to wise up? The closest thing to ancient Athenian Democracy is modern Meritocracy with its 100% inheritance tax to abolish dynastic rich elites and end their power over the people once and for all. You can have capitalism (rule by capitalists) or democracy (rule by the people, especially those with no capital), but you can’t have both. What’s it to be?

*****

What’s the central problem with the world? It’s that people still believe in names. They think capitalist democracy is about democracy because democracy is mentioned as clear as day. They fail to analyze the word “capitalism” and what it’s doing as the qualifier of “democracy”. Here’s the proper analysis: 1) Democracy = rule by the people: government of the people, by the people, for the people. 2) Capitalist Democracy = rule by capitalists, using powerless, sham governments elected by the people: government of the people, by capitalists, for capitalists. Well, are we wrong? If not, then it’s time to overthrow “democracy”, i.e. rule by the rich capitalist elite. It’s time for the people to stop being suckers and marks. With “capitalist democracy”, the rich pulled off one of the most audacious cons of all time. They seized power from the people and then convinced the people that they themselves were in charge. Now that’s clever. It’s about time the people got clever too and seized control back.

The Three Ways The Old World Order = the same old way of doing things, with the same old people in charge. The New World Order = a brand new way of doing things, with the people in charge (for the first time ever). The No World Order = anarchy, chaos, lawlessness, the jungle. So, what’s it to be?

Know Thy Enemy Anarchists. Libertarians. Free-market capitalists. Randroid anarcho-capitalist libertarians. Private Bankers.

Wall Street. Washington D.C. The military. The police. The intelligence services. All mainstream political parties. Dumbocracy. Freedumb. Abrahamism (Jews, Christians and Muslims). Karmism. Conspiracy theorists. Monarchy. Nobility. Privileged elites. Supporters of private inheritance. Dynastic ruling families. All conservatives. All right wingers. All “patriots”. All nationalists. All racists. All sexists. All those opposed to equal opportunities and a level playing field for all (via 100% inheritance tax). Revalue all values!!!

Replace Dumbocracy with Meritocracy. Replace free-market capitalism with social capitalism. Impose 100% inheritance tax and abolish all dynastic family elites. Downgrade the family and upgrade community. Replace unenlightened, evil, Satanic religion with Illuminism (ontological mathematics, based on the rational, mathematical monadic soul). Replace bad, negative liberty government with good, positive liberty government. Replace the bad State (run according to the particular wills of rich ruling elites) with the good State (run meritocratically according to the General Will of the people). Make the world Apollonian rather than Dionysian. Downgrade Mythos and Upgrade Logos. Make the world rational rather than dominated by nostalgia, sentimentality and irrational, self-indulgent feelings.

***** Fuck “unconditional love”. Build the Republic of Reason. Reboot the world. Revalue all values!!! ***********************

Self-Interest “What counts is not where you come from but where you are going.” – David Cameron, Prime Minister of the UK, from one of the most elite backgrounds you can possibly get. For people such as David Cameron, the only thing that counts is the background you come from, and that determines exactly where you are

going (nowhere if you’re not from the privileged elite). Cameron and his advisers knew from the outset that they had to defuse the accusation that he had succeeded purely thanks to privilege. The formulation they devised is ingenious since it’s exactly the same one that someone from a wholly underprivileged background would deploy. Of course, the privileged elite would instantly turn their nose up at anyone from the “wrong” background, but that’s another story. Cameron and his apologists robotically use his chosen mantra whenever anyone challenges Cameron’s elitist background. Yet the whole point of a Society of Privilege is that your background is everything. You must be “one of us”. You must have the right bloodline, the right school tie, the right college blazer. If you don’t, you must be discriminated against. If you weren’t, what would be the point of privilege? There’s no value in belonging to a club that anyone can join. Why would people spend a fortune on private education if it did not result in overwhelming competitive advantage? Why did David Cameron’s parents send him to the finest schools, colleges and universities they possibly could, at vast expense, if not to ensure that his background would be his “access to all areas” golden pass? If background doesn’t matter at all, as privileged Cameron claims, then he won’t have any objection to 100% inheritance tax that wipes out dynastic wealth and stigmatizes anyone who can’t stand on their own two feet and make their own way through life, without relying on the efforts and money of others.

Evil? “Evil, when we are in its power, is not felt as evil but as a necessity, or even a duty.” – Simone Weil Many Nazis were executed at the end of WWII for being “evil”. Yet the truth was that the vast majority were, as they insisted, “only obeying orders” and would never have done what they did otherwise. They felt they had to do what they were told, that it was a duty and something over which they had no choice (it was a necessity, a compulsion). Can you really hang people for that? 99.9% of the human race would have behaved in exactly the same way in the same circumstances. Why do people deceive

themselves that they would have heroically acted differently? It’s always a mistake to believe your own propaganda. Weil’s quotation is entirely appropriate to Eichmann, Abraham, and countless human beings who just go along with the system.

Anti-Karma We live in an anti-karma universe. The good are punished and the evil rewarded. Karmists talk about “cause and effect” without explaining what this means. (In fact, cause and effect is strictly a mathematical feature and has nothing to do with anything else: cause and effect is what is produced by a mathematical equation describing motion.) Who decides that Hitler was “evil” and thus should be punished in the next life (the “effect” of his evil conduct)? Hitler believed himself a great and good man. In his view, he should be rewarded by coming back as a super, triumphant Hitler. How can anyone say Hitler is wrong? To do so is to impose your own value system on Hitler and the world. But Hitler completely rejects your value system. Why are you right and he wrong, other than by virtue of your humble and distinctly fallible opinion? Who decides what the karmic causes are, and the karmic effects? Where is there any absolute code for punishing Hitler? Where is there any absolute cosmic code for ensuring that the effects of Hitler’s next life are bad rather than good? If Hitler kept becoming more and more evil and powerful in future lives, how would that be inconsistent with karmic “cause and effect”? The whole problem is that karmic cause and effect is mumbo jumbo. It’s just people’s interpretations, conjectures and opinions. There’s nothing certain about it. It’s not mathematics!

The Islamic Calendar The Islamic Calendar begins in the year 622 CE, and commemorates the decisive move of Mohammed from Mecca to Medina, after which Islam rapidly started to prosper. So, that’s the Islamic Year One, just as the year of Jesus Christ’s birth is the Christian Year One. So, Muslims and Christians completely disagree on what Year One is, and they are over six hundred years apart. Moreover, a Muslim year has only 354 days (and 355 in a leap year).

In 1925 CE, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, the leader of Turkey, decreed that his nation should adopt the Western calendar. On 31 December, the people of Turkey lived in 1341. The following day, 1 January, they lived in 1926! That’s time travel for you.

Mustafa Kemal Atatürk Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, the founder of the Turkish Republic and its first President, is one of the greatest figures in the whole of history, a true Superman. A war hero of the Dardanelles campaign of 1915, Atatürk saved Turkey after WWI when it came under attack internally and externally, and proceeded to abolish the enfeebled and corrupt Ottoman dynasty. This great liberator and superb strategist was said to have maintained a perfect military record, with no defeats at all. President for 15 years, until his death in 1938, Atatürk completely transformed Turkey, dragging it into the modern world almost singlehandedly. He introduced sweeping reforms in all aspects of Turkish society: political, legal, economic, social, psychological, religious and cultural. Arguably, what he did has never been emulated in any other modern country by any other person. The religious views of Atatürk were perhaps the most remarkable thing about him. In a staunchly Islamic nation, he was either an agnostic or atheist (despite disingenuous attempts to claim him as a devout Muslim). In truth, Atatürk regarded Islam as the religion of Arabs, not of the Turks, saying, “It is claimed that religious unity is also a factor in the formation of nations. Whereas, we see the contrary in the Turkish nation. Turks were a great nation even before they adopted Islam. This religion did not help the Arabs, Persians, Egyptians and others to unite with Turks to form a nation. Conversely, it weakened the Turks’ national relations; it numbed Turkish national feelings and enthusiasm. This was natural, because Mohammedanism was based on Arab nationalism above all nationalities.” This is absolutely true. Turkey has a great history and has no need whatsoever of an Arabian religion and Arabian worldview. If anything, Arabia should be subservient to Turkey. Atatürk said, “For nearly five hundred years, these rules and theories [regarding civil and criminal law] of an Arab Sheikh and the interpretations of generations of lazy and good-for-nothing priests have decided the civil and criminal law of Turkey. They have decided the form of the

Constitution, the details of the lives of each Turk, his food, his hours of rising and sleeping, the shape of his clothes, the routine of the midwife who produced his children, what he learned in his schools, his customs, his thoughts – even his most intimate habits. This theology of an immoral Arab [presented as Islam] is a dead thing. Possibly it might have suited tribes in the desert. It is no good for a modern, progressive state. God’s revelation! There is no God! These are only the chains by which the priests and bad rulers bound the people down. A ruler who needs religion is a weakling. No weaklings should rule!” This is an awe-inspiring statement. Atatürk, in effect, declared himself the antidote to Mohammed, and it’s a tragedy that Turkey remains Islamic. As far as Atatürk was concerned, Mohammed was a backward and even immoral Arab, and it was scandalous that Turks were being controlled by the ancient and primitive views of such a man. Atatürk actually despised religion: “I have no religion, and at times I wish all religions at the bottom of the sea. He is a weak ruler who needs religion to uphold his government; it is as if he would catch his people in a trap. My people are going to learn the principles of democracy, the dictates of truth and the teachings of science. Superstition must go. Let them worship as they will; every man can follow his own conscience, provided it does not interfere with sane reason or bid him against the liberty of his fellow-men.” Additionally, Atatürk explicitly stated, “I am an atheist, out and out. It took me a long time to say it. I’ve been an atheist for years and years, but somehow I felt it was intellectually unrespectable to say one was an atheist, because it assumed knowledge that one didn’t have. Somehow, it was better to say one was a humanist or an agnostic. I finally decided that I’m a creature of emotion as well as of reason. Emotionally, I am an atheist. I don’t have the evidence to prove that God doesn’t exist, but I so strongly suspect he doesn’t that I don’t want to waste my time.”

***** “For everything in the world...the truest guide is knowledge and science.” – Atatürk “To seek a guide other than knowledge and science is a mark of heedlessness, ignorance, and aberration.” – Atatürk

“To you I’m an atheist; to God, I’m the Loyal Opposition.” – Atatürk Early on in his career, before he was secure, Atatürk made “political” gestures towards religion and Islam: “In my view, even irreligious types are believers. It is impossible for a person to be irreligious. Nobody can be irreligious.”; “Religion is human beings’ nourishment. An irreligious man is like an empty house. He distresses people.”; “We must always believe in something. This last of the faiths is of course the most perfect. Islam is superior to all faiths…”; “The Turkish nation must be more devout. It must be devout in all simplicity. I believe this in the same way I believe in my faith…” Historian Kemal Karpat said, “He was not against Islam, but against those who opposed his political power using religious arguments.” In fact, Atatürk loathed Islam, seeing it as an alien and imported Arab religion that had destroyed Turkey’s proud roots and true culture. However, he knew it was impossible to overthrow Islam there and then. He believed that if he set up a modern, secular Turkish State, Islam would simply fade away over time. Alas, this has not happened. The Turks remain infected by Arabian Islam and have not yet found their ancient, pre-Islamic identity once again. Atatürk also hated the decrepit Islamic Ottoman Empire and its failed and retarded culture. He promoted secularism, religious freedom, science, logic, education, progress, modernisation, Westernisation, individual choice, civil law. He said, “Religion is a matter of conscience. One is always free to act according to the will of one’s conscience. We (as a nation) are respectful of religion. It is not our intention to curtail freedom of worship, but rather to ensure that matters of religion and those of the state do not become intertwined.” What an enlightened man. What a contrast to the Muslim fanatics who want the return of the intolerant Islamic caliphate. Where the Ottoman Empire sought to integrate Islam and the State, Atatürk wanted to separate them. The Ottomans wanted a relationship between Turkey and Allah. Atatürk advocated that the relationship should instead be between the individual and Allah, and the State should stay out of it. He was the opposite of the moronic Islamic terrorists of today. The whole Islamic world requires a strong man of the calibre of Atatürk to reform it and bring it into the modern world. Turkey is the only advanced Islamic nation and that’s because it’s not really Islamic at all. It’s Turkish!

Reforms Atatürk abolished Islamic forms of headdress such as turbans and the fez in favour of Western suits and hats. He describe the hijab as a “ridiculous object” and banned it in public buildings. He changed the traditional Islamic calendar to the Western Gregorian calendar. The Muslim call to prayer had to be made in Turkish rather Arabic. The Islamic “holy day” of Friday was no longer considered part of the weekend and Turkey adopted the Western norms of Saturday and Sunday as the work-free days. Islam was no longer constitutionally recognised as the official state religion. Turkey was now a secular nation with religious freedom. At all times, Atatürk taught the progressive history of the non-Islamic West against the regressive history of the Islamic Ottomans. If he could have got away with it, he would have abolished Islam itself. Ever since the Turks were forced to convert to Islam, the Turkish language had used Arabic lettering. Atatürk replaced Arabic letters with Latin letters. He wanted to make it as hard as possible for Turks to read the Koran in its original Arabic form, and hoped interest in it would die off. Atatürk was determined to replace an Islamic identity with a nationalistic Turkish identity. Old Turkish words that had become obsolete during the Ottoman era were restored instead of Arabic words. The new use of language separated the old generation of Turks from the new, and allowed the new to be given a new culture, history and identity, free from the propaganda of the elders.

Kemalism Atatürk had six key principles, called the “Six Arrows”: 1) Republicanism: Atatürk detested the old Ottoman Empire and rule by dynastic elites. He sought to end class privileges and distinctions. He promoted the concept of the sacrosanct Turkish citizen, protected by the law and given equal opportunities. Women received the right to vote in 1934. Only a Republican regime can reflect the General Will of the people. 2) Populism: A Revolution can succeed in the long term only if it is popular and promotes the common good and Commonwealth. Atatürk said, “Sovereignty belongs unconditionally to the people.”; “The new Turkish State is a state of the people and a state by the people.”; “We are a nation

without classes or special privileges.” Atatürk was absolutely committed to education, saying, “The government’s most creative and significant duty is education.” 3) Secularism: The separation of state and religion; the separation of religion from educational, cultural and legal affairs. Atatürk excluded Islam from an official role in the life of the nation. This must be done in all Islamic countries. 4) Reformism: The replacement of traditional institutions with modern institutions; the elimination of traditional concepts and the adoption of progressive ideas. Atatürk said, “We must liberate our concepts of justice, our laws and legal institutions from the bonds which hold a tight grip on us although they are incompatible with the needs of our century.” 5) Nationalism: Anti-imperialist, anti-Ottoman, anti-Arab, anti-clerical, anti-elitism, anti-dynastic rule. The Turkish State is the union of its territory and its people. 6) Statism: The use of the power of the State (positive liberty) to transform the nation. Using State power to implement modernisation, economic and technological development and progressive social policies, and to eradicate backward, traditional practices, attitudes and beliefs. The State was totally in charge of the economy.

***** Atatürk took the backward, Islamic ruins of the Ottoman Empire and transformed them into a modern Republic, the most successful, progressive and modern Islamic nation of them all. It would prosper even more without Islam. There are always people who say, “Such and such can never be done. It’s too hard. The people are too set in their ways. There will be too much resistance. It’s too difficult.” Atatürk proves all of this wrong. Strong leaders with a strong vision can achieve anything. There is no reason at all why a New World Order, empowering the people, cannot be established. The task facing Atatürk of reforming Turkey was far more daunting than that of implementing meritocracy. All that is required is to overthrow the 1%. Why is that any kind of problem? A single tax – 100% inheritance – provides the solution instantly.

Exile? “The whole nation from that time was strictly forbidden to set foot on the region about Jerusalem, by the formal decree and enactment of Hadrian, who commanded that they should not even look from afar on their native soil! So writes Aristo of Pella.” – Eusebius (describing Hadrian’s permanent banishment of Jews from Jerusalem, with the city being renamed Aelia Capitolina). Many people believe that the Jews were expelled from Israel en masse by the Romans. In fact, the Jews left the ravaged areas of Judea, most especially around Jerusalem, and entered other parts of the region, but still within historical Israel. Many of these same people gradually evolved into the modern Palestinians! The “Exile” was from Jerusalem, not from Israel per se. There was no forced Roman mass expulsion, no wholesale enslavement of the people. Rather, the people left the Jerusalem area and went to places such as Galilee that had not rebelled against Rome and were thus untouched. It was the “Jerusalem” Jews – the religious maniacs and fanatics, like the modern Taliban and Muslim jihadists – who revolted against Rome and were crushed and expelled. The moderate Jews suffered none of this. Popular history records that the Jews were thrown out of Israel into dreadful exile. This simply never happened. It was a lie constructed by the fanatical Jews who lost their Holy Temple. For them, the age of prophecy came to an end there and then. There were no more Jewish prophets. The proud line had come to an end. The Jewish God was no longer in the land. His home (the Temple) was in ruins. This catastrophe – the complete destruction of God’s city by the pagan Romans – became a metaphor for the Jews that defined their identity. By being exiled from Jerusalem (but not the Jewish land itself), the Jews felt that they had been exiled from their God and thus their true and sacred identity as the Chosen People. Yet the Jews were still in Israel. They hadn’t gone anywhere. It’s a lie that they were driven out. They didn’t lose their homeland at all. It wasn’t taken from them. Rather, over time, the moderate Jews abandoned their religion and most became Christians and, especially, Muslims. And no one wants to talk about that – the treason of the Jews against their God.

Political Clothing

In Cambridge in the UK, a man walked into a supermarket in full Nazi uniform. It was Halloween. Customers complained and the manager asked him to leave. Police were even called. So much for people being “free” to wear whatever they like. We often hear Muslim women saying that the veil is just a “piece of cloth” and no one should have any veto over what people wear. It seems that this does not apply to Nazi uniforms on Halloween. If wearing a Nazi uniform is a provocative political statement, so is wearing the veil, and it should be greeted with exactly the same revulsion, complaints and police action. No religious clothing is ever worn “innocently”.

The “Free” Market The market is not moral, rational, or intelligent. It’s fuelled by greed and fear. In other words, the market reflects the Freudian Id and drags us all down into the gutter. The State, if completely decoupled from the market, is capable of being moral, rational and intelligent, as in Plato’s Republic. The State can reflect the Superego and raise us all up into the heavens. The choice between the market and the State is the choice between amorality (and inevitable immorality) versus morality, unreason versus reason, unintelligence versus intelligence, the individual versus the collective. The market could never deliver a paradise for all, only for those best at playing the market (which means those best at being utterly unscrupulous and willing to trample others into the ground). Moreover, a market, far from being a competitive arena, soon features a small number of dominant players who then promote oligopolies and monopolies. They form cartels that relentlessly rig the market – exactly as we see in the world today! It’s the market that created the 1% that rules the world. The strong, meritocratic, rational, moral State acting in the interest of all is the antidote to the market. The market is essentially evil, the meritocratic State good, and anarchy mad (and indeed closely linked to the market and tyranny: it’s no mistake that extreme right wing anarchists advocate Ayn Rand’s anarcho-capitalist libertarianism where the rich rule the world as dictators, much as they do today).

The Inevitable Speech

Have you ever heard a leader of a country condemning the military? Leaders never tire of praising the military as “heroes”, “supremely brave”, “protecting our nation”, “serving their country”, “giving their lives for the people”. Of course, the military’s primary function is to defend the leaders and carry out their policies, no matter how vile, and everything else is accidental.

The A-Listers A-list men always go for beautiful women: trophy partners. A-list women go for handsome men, buff men, brainy men, powerful men, rich men, funny men or dominant men. These are also trophy partners but in a more complex way.

Family Versus Community Capitalism and religion rely on the paternalistic, patriarchal, nuclear, atomised, anti-social, competitive family, reflecting a) game theory played according to the rules of nothing but naked self-interest, b) the particular will, c) private wealth and d) the common blood of the family. Socialism and humanism rely on a) the community, b) the collective, c) the group, d) the General Will, e) the common good, f) the Commonwealth, g) the common humanity. In the patriarchal family, the father performs the thinking (rational) role and the mother the affective (emotional) role. This entrenches sexism. A community upbringing provides a whole host of diverse role models for a child. A nuclear family upbringing gives them a very narrow view of reality, namely that of the (generally) mediocre, conventional parents.

***** Inheritance is about the transmission of private wealth within the dynastic family and is utterly hostile to the Commonwealth. The family has always been the enemy, the Fifth Colum, within society, subverting the General Will of the People in favour of the particular will of the family and individual.

The Other

Abrahamism is all about “us” (the faithful) and “them” (the infidels). Freemarket capitalism is all about “us” (the capitalist elite) and “them” (the proletariat). In religion and free-market capitalism, there is always the privileged elite (the in-crowd) and the “other” (the out-crowd). In a proper, communitarian system serving the General Will, there should never be any “other”. It should always be about “we”, “us”, the whole group, with no part privileged over the rest, rendering the rest “other”.

The Old World Order “To succeed in the world it is not enough to be stupid; you must also be well-mannered.” – Voltaire The Old World Order cultivate “manners” and cultural capital. This does not disguise their fundamental stupidity and selfishness.

The Ape of God “[God’s ape is] one that faines to imitate him [God] though in contrary ways.” – John Gaule The Devil is a parodist, an imitator, an impersonator. He copies, never produces. He is a Destroyer, not a Creator. The Devil is about dissimulation, irony, sarcasm, skepticism, cynicism, mockery, hyperbole, cheating, deception, delusion, fake magic and fantasy. The Devil is a fallen angel who imagines himself a God.

The Magisterium “In Catholicism, the Magisterium is the teaching authority of the Church. According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church: ‘The task of interpreting the Word of God authentically has been entrusted solely to the Magisterium of the Church, that is, to the Pope and to the bishops in communion with him.’ Catholic theology divides the functions of the teaching office of the Church into two categories: the infallible sacred magisterium and the fallible ordinary magisterium. The infallible sacred magisterium includes the extraordinary declarations of the pope speaking ex cathedra and of ecumenical councils (traditionally expressed in conciliar creeds, canons, and decrees), as well as of the ordinary and universal

magisterium. Despite its name, the ‘ordinary and universal magisterium’ falls under the infallible sacred magisterium, and in fact is the usual manifestation of the infallibility of the Church, the decrees of popes and councils being ‘extraordinary’.” – Wikipedia

The Wisdom of Dean Inge “A good government remains the greatest of human blessings and no nation has ever enjoyed it.” – Dean Inge That’s why we need meritocracy. “It takes in reality only one to make a quarrel. It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favour of vegetarianism, while the wolf remains of a different opinion.” – Dean Inge The most powerful always win. The rational are dialectically certain to win since intelligence is much more powerful than anything else. “Faith is an act of rational choice, which determines us to act as if certain things were true, and in the confident expectation that they will prove to be true.” – Dean Inge Faith is self-delusion for a rational reason – people feel empowered by lies. “Gambling is a disease of barbarians superficially civilized.” – Dean Inge Most people are only superficially civilised. Scratch the surface, and civilisation vanishes, leaving only the underlying animal. “The proper time to influence the character of a child is about a hundred years before he is born.” – Dean Inge It takes an embedded civilisation, a high culture, to produce great people. We live in a “civilisation” and “culture” that is based on greed (the profit principle) and produces human trash. “All faith consists essentially in the recognition of a world of spiritual values behind, yet not apart from, the world of natural phenomena.” – Dean Inge All rationalism consists essentially in the recognition of a world of intelligible, rational values behind, yet not apart from, the world of natural

phenomena (the sensible world). “Don’t get up from the feast of life without paying for your share of it.” – Dean Inge The poor always pay full price, and the rich always dine free. “Man, as we know him, is a poor creature; he is halfway between an ape and a god and he is travelling in the right direction.” – Dean Inge Mythos humans (right brain feeling types) are apes. Logos humans (left brain rational types) are gods. Logos will inevitably destroy Mythos. “We tolerate shapes in human beings that would horrify us if we saw them in a horse.” – Dean Inge A morbidly obese horse would be put down. “If the universe is running down like a clock, the clock must have been wound up at a date which we could name if we knew it. The world, if it is to have an end in time, must have had a beginning in time.” – Dean Inge The spacetime world did have a beginning in time. That does not mean it was created by “God”. Before the time and space domain of matter was the frequency domain of mind, outside space and time. “In praising science, it does not follow that we must adopt the very poor philosophies which scientific men have constructed. In [scientific] philosophy they have much more to learn than to teach.” – Dean Inge Indeed.

The Reboot The world must be re-set. We must reboot and get rid of all the junk that has built up over human history. The main junk is mainstream religion on the one hand and the wealth and power of dynastic elite families (the Old World Order) on the other. It’s time to abolish religious brainwashing and bring the viral transmission of religion from generation to generation to an end. It’s time to impose 100% inheritance tax to bring to an end the Old World Order. Then we can start again, and this time we can rationally build paradise for the whole of humanity.

Hyperzone Are you in the zone? Are you in the hyperzone? The aimless aren’t in any zone, the achievers are in the zone, and the gods are in the hyperzone.

Marx “The end result of competition is the end of competition.” – Marx All free-market capitalist competition ends in cartels, oligopolies and monopolies. “After years of internecine warfare amongst capitalists there would be fewer and fewer capitalists controlling vaster and vaster empires.” – Marx The logic of capitalism is that it eats itself. Eventually, you have the apex predator capitalist owing the whole world – and then Revolution is inevitable.

***** House prices in London are shooting up to incredible, record levels. The price rises are not being driven by Londoners or British citizens, but from rich speculators from all over the world who can buy £1 million houses for cash. Why should foreigners be allowed to determine British house prices? This is what capitalist globalism is doing to the world. The rich are completely distorting the world economy. It’s time for the people to strike back. We can’t let ourselves be held hostage by rich speculators any longer.

Indifference “The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.” – Plato Actually, if you’re indifferent, you’re not a “good” man.

Islamic Jihad Kill others, be killed by others, and go to the highest heaven as a glorious martyr (homicidal martyrdom).

Kill others, and kill yourself, and go to the highest heaven as a glorious martyr (homicidal, suicidal martyrdom). Islam – the cult of death; death for others and death for yourself. Islam – paradise in exchange for murder and suicide. Give your life a meaning, absolve yourself of all your sins – martyr yourself and sit at God’s table. Islam – a religion of feeling wholly cut off from reason. What moral God welcomes bloodstained killers to his home? It’s not God, it’s the Devil who awaits Muslim “martyrs” (Satan’s elite guard).

Tolstoy the Anarchist Tolstoy was one of the most articulate advocates of the anarchist position. The following quotations by him are exactly the kind of things that presentday anarchists and libertarians say: “In all history there is no war which was not hatched by the governments, the governments alone, independent of the interests of the people, to whom war is always pernicious even when successful.” – Tolstoy “The government assures the people that they are in danger from the invasion of another nation, or from foes in their midst, and that the only way to escape this danger is by the slavish obedience of the people to their government. This fact is seen most prominently during revolutions and dictatorships, but it exists always and everywhere that the power of the government exists. Every government explains its existence, and justifies its deeds of violence, by the argument that if it did not exist the condition of things would be very much worse. After assuring the people of its danger the government subordinates it to control, and when in this condition compels it to attack some other nation. And thus the assurance of the government is corroborated in the eyes of the people, as to the danger of attack from other nations.” – Tolstoy “Not only does the action of Governments not deter men from crimes; on the contrary, it increases crime by always disturbing and lowering the moral standard of society.” – Tolstoy

“The truth is that the State is a conspiracy designed not only to exploit, but above all to corrupt its citizens ... Henceforth, I shall never serve any government anywhere.” – Tolstoy “Armies are necessary, before all things, for the defence of governments from their own oppressed and enslaved subjects.” – Tolstoy “Government is an association of men who do violence to the rest of us.” Tolstoy was a Christian anarchist and the absurdity of his position is shown by the following quotation: “Nor can this be otherwise, since always and everywhere a Government, by its very nature, must put in the place of the highest, eternal, religious law (not written in books but in the hearts of men, and binding on every one) its own unjust, man-made laws, the object of which is neither justice nor the common good of all but various considerations of home and foreign expediency.” Here he plays the game familiar from America’s Tea Party of claiming that Government is a kind of “false God” setting itself up in God’s place and imposing manmade laws rather than divine laws (“natural”) on the people. However, the fallacy lies in the fact that religion is as manmade as anything else and Tolstoy’s Christian anarchy would be intolerable to all nonChristians and they would fight to be free of it. How would Tolstoy respond? Well, either he would “turn the other cheek” and allow he and all of his supporters to be crushed, or he would get an army together and fight, using exactly the same rhetoric that he condemned in government, and for exactly the same purpose – to advance his own cause. Anarchy is the true creed of violence, and government is the antidote. Most anarchists are, like Tolstoy, religious fundamentalists who despise government because it rightly rejects their crazy religious beliefs. The whole point of the separation of Church and State is to stop religious lunatics from running the government as a theocracy. Tolstoy, had he come to power, would have been an intolerable tyrant, forcing people to accept the “Godmade” laws of Jesus Christ. In the end, all anarchists are wolves in sheep’s clothing. They are opposed to government because government stands in their way. Tolstoy would have had no problem with the thousand-year government of Jesus

Christ, so it’s not actually government that he rejects but who is in the government and what their beliefs are (contrary to his own). Randian anarcho-capitalists would have no problem with government by Ayn Rand. All of these people are hypocrites and fascists, determined to impose, in the name of freedom (their own, not yours), their particular will on the people. Only governments that advance the General Will are acceptable and legitimate.

Christian Anarchism Christian anarchism is anarchism allied with Christian ideals and practices. Jesus Christ is often called the first anarchist. What, the same God of Christianity who ordered a father to murder his son, who exterminated humanity bar Noah and his family, who sentenced humanity to perpetual hell via Original Sin, who elevated the Jews above everyone else and promised them a land already occupied by the Canaanites, and who called himself “King of the Jews”? God spare us from the Christian anarchists and indeed from all anarchists and libertarians.

***** “He who obeys God needs no other authority.” – Petr Chelčický Here we see the truth of anarchism. The anarchists are opposed to authority only when it involves humans. They have no objection to being the slaves of “God”. Right wing anarchists are perfectly happy to bow to the authority of the “market”. Left wing anarchists want to bow to the authority of “selforganisation” (whatever that is). You can’t escape from authority. The game is to optimise it for the benefit of all, not to abolish it (or pretend to abolish it) for the benefit of the few.

Surviving the Fools: The Traitors Within “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a

traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.” – Cicero How do anarchists propose to deal with such people, with the wolves in the sheep pen? By spouting platitudes about peace and “unconditional love” at them? Cicero understood human nature. The anarchists and libertarians do not, or are actually the people Cicero was warning us about!

Cartels “A cartel is a formal (explicit) ‘agreement’ among competing firms. It is a formal organization of producers and manufacturers that agree to fix prices, marketing, and production. Cartels usually occur in an oligopolistic industry, where the number of sellers is small (usually because barriers to entry, most notably start-up costs, are high) and the products being traded are usually homogeneous. Cartel members may agree on such matters as price fixing, total industry output, market shares, allocation of customers, allocation of territories, bid rigging, establishment of common sales agencies, and the division of profits or combination of these. The aim of such collusion (also called the cartel agreement) is to increase individual members’ profits by reducing competition.” – Wikipedia A cartel involves collusion between supposed competitors to rig the market in their mutual favour. “Collusion” does not in fact have to be explicit, and indeed such collusion is illegal in most countries. The oligopolies get round this via implicit collusion, which is legal because no evidence of explicit collusion is ever found. Implicit collusion means that the rules of the game are so well embedded and understood that none of the conspirators have to explicitly state their agenda. They all perform their roles automatically. They know exactly what everyone else will do because they are all operating according to the same hidden agenda, the same complicitous silence. When a conspiracy is sufficiently well established, the conspirators never have to meet and never have to discuss anything. They simply carry out “business as usual,” which is nothing but the usual conspiracy of the elites to defraud the people in their own self-interest.

All anti-cartel “legislation” is itself collusive and part of the cartel methodology since it demands “proof” of collusion and this proof will never be found because everyone knows the game without talking about it.

The Blame Game Who’s to blame for the dire state of today’s world? The popular narrative is that government is responsible. Of course, that’s a true to a large degree, but there’s a larger problem standing behind government and which controls government – the free-market capitalism of the super rich. It’s this that is ruining the world, and government’s culpability is that it’s the poodle of the rich and does nothing to rein them in. Globalisation is not an initiative of any nation state. It’s wholly about the agenda of free-market capitalists. It’s capitalists that seek global domination and to run every nation, not the governments of nation states. They are compelled to obey the rich man’s agenda because the rich now control the global economy. True government can have no place when rich puppet masters standing behind the government are pulling the vital economic strings. These strings must be cut once and for all. Those who rule are those who control the economy. Currently, that’s the rich. It must become the people. That can be achieved only through 100% inheritance tax.

David and Goliath David and Goliath is presented as the tale of the little guy versus the unbeatable giant ... and beating him. Yet wasn’t David the future king of Israel and ancestor of Jesus Christ? Wasn’t he divinely favoured by none other than the all-powerful Creator of the universe? So, wasn’t “Goliath” actually the little guy up against “God”, and he lost! The truth is that the genuine little guy never wins. You win because you are the “big” guy ... because you have discovered some phenomenal weapon. “David” and “Goliath” are always wrong attributions. People get confused by appearance. A person might seem stronger when in fact rational analysis shows that he’s suffering from a radical disadvantage that gives him a fatal vulnerability. The truth is that the weak never win and the strong always win. That is an inviolable law of nature.

The Jewish Schism In the ancient world, power was everything (indeed, it still is). The Hebrews once worshipped the pagan gods of the Canaanites. Then a faction grew that wanted to worship a Hebrew god. The god they chose was a very warlike, powerful Canaanite soul-devouring demon who, like the Devil in Abrahamism, opposed the Canaanite gods. He was their great adversary who wanted to overthrow them and rule alone in their place. This demon was named Yahweh by the Jews and they became fanatical monotheists, slavishly devoted to this God. Yet Yahweh was in fact never anything other than Satan who devoured souls. The tale of Abraham and Isaac makes perfect sense when you grasp the true origins of Judaism. “God” orders Abraham to make a human sacrifice of his own son because that’s exactly what Devils do. They are evil monsters who terrorise the weak and submissive (like Abraham) and force them to bow and kneel (like all Jews, Christians and Muslims). Abrahamism is the worship of the Satan. It always has been. Anyone who thinks that the True God would order a father to murder his son is deranged. Only a False God would do such a thing. But, of course, the Jews worshipped (and still worship) power. Who will you serve? – the Lord of this world who will give you power in this world, or the Lord of another world that you will never reach unless you gain the knowledge (gnosis) to escape from this prison? The Jews (and Abrahamists) chose to make the best of this cosmic prison and worship their evil Gaoler. That’s why our world is fucked. The masses worship power rather than truth or reason. Power, as history shows, is wholly immoral.

Freedom “Freedom” is one of the central reasons why the world is such a bad place. The rhetoric of freedom goes hand in hand with the Freudian Id, with pleasure-seeking, with instant-gratification, with capitalist consumerism, with getting to do whatever you want. Other people are the obstacle to getting what you want, so a world of “freedom” becomes more and more atomised since no one wants to make compromises with anyone else. Everyone starts living alone or in very small family units. Why is community so hated? Why is there no real

community-living in the world? Because people living in a true community would need to learn to respect the rights of others, to restrain their own “freedoms”. And no one wants to do that. The “freedom” agenda has created an anti-social world of selfish people participating in a game theory version of life. The end result is an epidemic of loneliness amongst the elderly, of lack of cooperation between people, of no feeling of community, of no social solidarity, of countless dysfunctional families that have nowhere to turn to when everything falls apart. Society doesn’t have proper mechanisms for helping people. By the doctrine of negative liberty, the State is actively told to stay out of people’s lives. Any State intervention is seen as anti-freedom and wholly unacceptable. It’s routinely condemned as the “nanny State” or even as oppression and tyranny. And so we have a world of misery and woe, of loneliness, helplessness, isolation, alienation, fragmentation, non-cooperation, selfishness, divisiveness, sectarianism, ghettoism – all in the name of “liberty”. Cui bono? The elite, of course. “Freedom” is their great weapon to divide and rule. Nothing is more seductive to the masses than: “I’ll do whatever I want, whatever I like, whenever I like. It’s all about me. I don’t want anyone telling me what to do. Government can kiss my ass.” That’s exactly how you get weak, bad, populist governments full of people who don’t know what they’re doing, and who have no principles or vision. All they do is take the rich man’s schilling and have themselves an easy life – just as everyone else aspires to.

The Veil Do Muslim women wear the veil for religious, political or cultural reasons? In a non-Islamic country, it’s purely a political gesture – designed to provoke the majority who disapprove of it. The women who wear it know it’s culturally unacceptable and yet they go ahead and wear it anyway. So, why should the majority tolerate it?

The Multicultural Fallacy Multiculturalism only works in nations that, like Britain, no longer have any identifiable culture of their own. Multiculturalism is what fills the cultural vacuum. If there is no national culture, it is simply replaced by the separate cultures of all those who have come to the nation from foreign countries,

cultures and religions. Multiculturalism is the failure of national culture and identity.

***** There’s no point in asking what “Britishness” means. In a multicultural nation such as Britain, there’s no British culture at all. All cultures in Britain are equally valid and given equal respect – that’s the meaning of multiculturalism – so cultures from all over the world have as much right to call themselves “British” as any “cultures” arising from people whose families have lived in Britain for millennia. Britain has a population, not a people. It has people who live there, not people who belong there. When you embrace multiculturalism, you no longer have a right to any national identity. The ancient Greeks had a single Greek culture expressed in a host of different ways via the city-state system. They did not have Persians, Babylonians, Assyrians, Indians and Egyptians living amongst them and accorded equal cultural respect.

The Conundrum If the Abrahamic God were the True God, how could Gnostics assert that he was in fact Satan? By anyone’s standards, there must be a serious problem with a God that many people believe to be the opposite. There could never be a single doubter of the credentials of the True God because he would never do anything with which any moral person could find fault. But any authentically moral person is appalled by the conduct and lack of morality of the Abrahamic God.

The Anarchy Fallacy “The philosophy of anarchy lies in empowering people to take control of their own lives and not on having others having power over them.” – James Cox This demonstrates the intellectual poverty of anarchy since it is unable to distinguish anarchy from a) Marxism b) Athenian democracy, c) meritocracy d) free-market capitalism and e) any political system that claims to serve the people.

*****

“Anarchy doesn’t mean ‘lawless’.” – An anarchist Dictionary definition of Anarchy: a situation of confusion and wild behaviour in which the people in a country, group, organization, etc., are not controlled by rules or laws; a lawless state. How can there be “laws” in a society without rulers or government? Who establishes the laws? Who is empowered to do so? Who enforces them? Why should anyone obey them? It’s plain that anarchists don’t actually know what anarchy is and just invent their own self-serving definitions. They imagine some fantastical state in which a perfect society spontaneously develops, where there is no conflict and everyone agrees on everything that has to be done. Does this resemble the human race of any sane and rational person’s experience?

***** There is in fact no such system as anarchy. Anarchy automatically degenerates into tyranny and the master-slave system since there is no one to prevent the strong trampling the weak into the dirt, exactly as happened in Stone Age times. A right wing system such as anarcho-capitalist libertarianism leads straight to rule by the super rich capitalists, who just keep getting richer and richer until they own the whole world and everyone in it, i.e. you get a capitalist master-slave system. A left wing anarchy promoting, “unconditional love and peace” is simply crushed in hours by those who prefer unconditional hate and war. After all, who’s going to stop them? Imagine a Christian world where everyone is encouraged to “turn the other cheek”. Those people who will not turn the other cheek, thank you very much, will simply enslave all of those who will. Render unto Caesar! Anarchy is always Caesarism. Anarchy simply creates the conditions in which a Caesar, Napoleon, Hitler, Stalin or Mao comes to power. Anarchy is the gospel of violence and dictatorship since that is the only possible rational end it can have. Anarchists have never addressed the case made by Thomas Hobbes. Regarding this, Wikipedia provides the following summary: “In Leviathan, Hobbes set out his doctrine of the foundation of states and legitimate governments – originating social contract theory. Leviathan

was written during the English Civil War; much of the book is occupied with demonstrating the necessity of a strong central authority to avoid the evil of discord and civil war. “Beginning from a mechanistic understanding of human beings and the passions, Hobbes postulates what life would be like without government, a condition which he calls the state of nature. In that state, each person would have a right, or license, to everything in the world. This, Hobbes argues, would lead to a ‘war of all against all’ (bellum omnium contra omnes). The description contains what has been called one of the best known passages in English philosophy, which describes the natural state mankind would be in, were it not for political community: ‘In such condition, there is no place for industry; because the fruit thereof is uncertain: and consequently no culture of the earth; no navigation, nor use of the commodities that may be imported by sea; no commodious building; no instruments of moving, and removing, such things as require much force; no knowledge of the face of the earth; no account of time; no arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.’ – Chapter XIII.: Of the Natural Condition of Mankind As Concerning Their Felicity, and Misery.”, Leviathan “In such a state, people fear death, and lack both the things necessary to commodious living, and the hope of being able to toil to obtain them. So in order to avoid it people accede to a social contract and establish a civil society. According to Hobbes, society is a population beneath a sovereign authority, to whom all individuals in that society cede some rights for the sake of protection. Any abuses of power by this authority are to be accepted as the price of peace. There is no doctrine of separation of powers in Hobbes’s discussion. According to Hobbes, the sovereign must control civil, military, judicial, and ecclesiastical powers.”

***** Anarchy can never be anything other than war of all against all. Look at how ungovernable America has become because of the right wing anarchist libertarians. Imagine that hopeless state multiplied a million-fold and you’ll be able to picture what an anarchy would be like. Nothing could be worse. Anarchy is always the precursor of rule by warlords and psychopaths. The whole of political philosophy has been directed towards a single end –

to provide ways of avoiding the horrors of anarchy and the master-slave tyranny that attends and succeeds it. It beggars belief that there are still people in the modern world who promote anarchy as some sort of inherent “good”. They are as insane as the Abrahamists and Karmists.

The Deluded Ones “Anarchy meritocracy is self management.” – An anarchist “Anarchy meritocracy is a system without government and without religion. It’s a world where people govern themselves with proper management. There aren’t any tyrants to rule. There’s no nationality, and there are no divisions. It’s a new world where humans unify as one-planet citizens.” – An anarchist This is the typical, incomprehensible fairytale nonsense that anarchists spout. It’s one thing for a person to manage himself. That may or may not be possible (in practice, most people can’t do anything on their own and require others to define their lives for them – that’s why so many people subscribe to absurd holy texts and obey them mindlessly). But how do people “self-manage” as a group? Given that no one has any authority over anyone else, how do people allocate tasks and divide resources between each other? What happens if everyone disagrees? Look at how much gridlock there is in American politics. An anarchy would be a thousand times worse. There would be total paralysis. nothing would get done. People wouldn’t agree on anything. The idea of a self-managing humanity would require an entirely different humanity from the one we actually have, and what’s for sure is that an anarchy would never give rise to such people. An anarchy is always stuck at the stage of a “war of all against all”. There is no mechanism for escaping that other than wishful thinking, self-delusion and fantasy. What’s the difference between government and management? Why is the latter better than the former? How do billions of people “self-manage” without any training, experience, knowledge, guidance, teachers or leaders, and a whole new way of living and working that only a strong and visionary government could ever engineer? Nietzsche said, “We are the new, the unique, the incomparable, those who impose on themselves their own law, those who create themselves.” He

was talking about supermen – human gods – not mediocre, delusional, dumb anarchists. Only a positive liberty Meritocratic Republic could produce humans of the calibre, quality and excellence Nietzsche had in mind. An anarchy would produce the sort of people who are all too familiar to us: Ayn Rand’s anarcho-capitalist libertarians, the worst people you could ever imagine.

God’s Reputation “I don’t know if God exists, but it would be better for his reputation if he didn’t.” – Jules Renard

Religious Plagiarism Shouldn’t the Jews sue the Christians and Muslims for plagiarism? The Christians have incorporated the whole Jewish Bible in their Bible, and the Koran is just the Jewish and Christian Bibles rewritten for an Arab audience.

***** Does the Abrahamic God have to keep going into a witness protection scheme and changing his identity? Is he on the run? Why do we never hear from him?

Who Won the Cold War? During the Cold War, people looked to America as the beacon of freedom, hope and coolness. Not anymore. America is variously seen as a police State, a nation of religious fundamentalist fanatics, a nation with a vast Third World aspect (carefully kept out of sight), a nation of narcissists, a nation of mad conspiracy theorists, a nation of insane anarcho-capitalist libertarians, a dumbed down nation mired in crass, shallow celebrity culture, a nation ruled by the super rich, a nation completely controlled by Wall Street and the banks, a nation with a dysfunctional government in Washington D.C. that can no longer govern. So, did America win the Cold War, or did it actually lose? No one sees it as free or cool now. It no longer carries the world’s hopes. Europeans are mostly delighted that they don’t live in America.

The Wealth Vote “Never be deceived that the rich will permit you to vote away their wealth.” – Lucy Parsons But what are the rich going to do about it? What army will fight for them? The French army didn’t help Louis XVI, did it? The king and his rich cronies all lost their heads.

Oscar Wilde “Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.” – Oscar Wilde Yet when you give people a mask, they can pretend to be anything other than who they are, and tell you nothing that’s true. “Ordinary riches can be stolen, real riches cannot. In your soul are infinitely precious things that cannot be taken from you.” – Oscar Wilde We need a world devoted to the accumulation of “real riches”. “The critic has to educate the public; the artist has to educate the critic.” – Oscar Wilde And who educates the artist? “I love talking about nothing. It is the only thing I know anything about.” – Oscar Wilde That’s true of almost the whole of humanity. “Man can believe the impossible, but can never believe the improbable.” – Oscar Wilde Why can’t man accept the rational? “I have the simplest tastes. I am always satisfied with the best.” – Oscar Wilde We should all be satisfied only with the best. “Nothing that is worth knowing can be taught.” – Oscar Wilde

On the contrary, everything worth knowing can be taught. It’s all in the math. “Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.” – Oscar Wilde And who would want to be anyone else? “A true friend stabs you in the front.” – Oscar Wilde And where does a true enemy stab you?

Hackers A hack: “an inelegant solution”. Hackers are clumsy, unsubtle, brute force practitioners of trial and error. Hardly people to be held in any respect. Julian Assange called for privacy for the individual and transparency for institutions. Should there be privacy for extremely rich individuals who run the world despite being unelected and unaccountable? Should Islamic terrorists be given privacy? Should institutions that protect a State’s secrets and security be “transparent”? Isn’t it time Assange entered the real world? His real agenda is this: his secrets should be preserved, and everyone else’ should be exposed. “I want to keep my secrets, but I want to know yours” – what kind of basis is that for society?

***** Hackers are now routinely hired by criminal gangs. Many others are employed by various States to perform international espionage and sabotage. The idea that hackers and hacktivists are going to be the saviours of the world must be one of the greatest delusions ever. Hackers are amongst the greatest threats facing the world. Most of them are on the autistic and psychopathic spectrum, wholly lacking in empathy and sympathy.

Natural Born Anarchists? “Everyone was born as an anarchist; don’t die as a slave.” – An anarchist

No one was born as an anarchist. Everyone was born to parents and to the “government” of the family. No one is born without rules, regulation, guidance and leadership, i.e. government. People are enslaved by bad government, to which good government is the antidote, not no government.

Separating the Sheep from the Goats The world is not divided into the good and evil or the faithful and the infidels, but the smart and the stupid. The vast majority of evil in the world is perpetrated by stupid people of faith.

The Art Deception It’s said that art is now all about the idea and that artists no longer possess any skill, any craft. They can’t sculpt, draw, stitch or paint. That being the case, how does “art” differ from philosophy where people have all sorts of ideas but no artistic skill?

Soft Power The world used to be ruled by “hard power” – military force. Today, hard power is typically in the background while in the foreground is “soft power” – the use of cultural, social, symbolic, human and financial capital.

The British Broadcasting Corporation “Our mission: To enrich people’s lives with programmes and services that inform, educate and entertain. “Our vision: To be the most creative organisation in the world. “Our values: “Trust is the foundation of the BBC: we are independent, impartial and honest. “Audiences are at the heart of everything we do. “We take pride in delivering quality and value for money. “Creativity is the lifeblood of our organisation.

“We respect each other and celebrate our diversity so that everyone can give their best. “We are one BBC: great things happen when we work together. “We seek to make the good popular and the popular good.” – BBC spokesperson

***** The BBC, if it lived up to its mission, vision and values would be a superb template for how the whole world should operate. Sadly, its full of greedy bureaucrats, functionaries and careerists who mock everything it supposedly stands for. It’s much easier to talk the talk than walk the walk.

Who’s Checking? In order to achieve a system of checks and balances, the American Constitution divided the national government into three branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. Have you noticed something radically missing from this picture? Where does the economy figure? Given that money is power, how can you have a political system that ignores the financial side of the nation? Where are the checks and balances on the economy? Who in the economy is politically accountable? It’s almost as if the economy has been deliberately left out. Why? Because that’s where true power lies, not with the gridlocked legislature and executive, and the pointless judiciary. The unelected, unaccountable rich don’t want any checks and balance imposed on them, and they don’t want the government to be strong enough to challenge them. The American system is perfectly designed for the country to be run by wealthy puppet masters – the controllers of the economy – who bypass the political system and people entirely. Cui bono?

The Worst Gaoler “What other dungeon is so dark as one’s heart! What jailer so inexorable as one’s self!” – Nathaniel Hawthorne

The Speech

Can anyone imagine a speech that proclaims, “Anarchy of the people, by the people, for the people”? It’s impossible to work out what such a statement would mean. Anarchy is all things to all people, hence is nothing at all. Nothing coherent and rational can come from it.

No Christ If your fate is determined before you are even born (predestination), which it must be if God has complete foreknowledge, then Jesus Christ is pointless and can’t “save” anyone. Moreover, faith is pointless and good deeds are pointless. We are simply actors playing out the parts written for us by God and we have no free will at all.

The Method The scientific method is one of humanity’s greatest triumphs and has transformed our world. Although it’s true that this method is ineffective in addressing the ultimate questions of existence (since the method is all about observables, and the ultimate truths are mathematical unobservables), it has nevertheless brought us all the innovations, inventions, medicines and technologies that have made our lives so luxurious and safe compared with those of our ancestors. Why, then, isn’t this spectacularly successful method applied elsewhere: to politics, economics, education, the health service, and so on? Why isn’t it applied to religion given that the world’s religions have observable features – prophets, holy texts, places of worship, rituals, customs, rules, distinctive clothes, laws, commandments, and so on? Only because people are irrational and do not want their ludicrous beliefs punctured and exposed for the charlatanry they assuredly are.

The Anarchist Conundrum Right wing anarchists loathe government because it taxes and regulates them and thus obstructs their obsessive pursuit of money, greed and power. Left wing anarchists loathe government because they associate it with money, greed and power. Here’s a question for all anarchists – what are you going to do about the anarchists who have a 100% different worldview from you? How do

anarchists address the anarchy of their own views, the fact that left and right wing anarchists can agree on only one thing: their hatred of government?

The Science Fallacy Scientists hate and mock homeopathy because they can envisage no materialist way in which it could possibly work. They say that any beneficial effects it allegedly has are caused by the placebo effect. The what? Yes, in order to trash homeopathy, scientists invoke something even more bizarre and mysterious in materialist terms – the notion that a mind that believes it is being cured can in fact effect its own cure. What, like magic? Go on then, scientists, explain how faith in a cure produces a material cure. If you can’t explain that (which you can’t) then how can you possibly say that homeopathy is false – since you don’t know anything about that either?!

Anarchy Schmamarchy Anarchists say that the answer to bad government is not good government but no government at all. So, given this logic, what else might they say? 1) The answer to bad schools is not good schools but no schools at all. 2) The answer to a bad economy is not a good economy but no economy at all. 3) The answer to bad laws is not good laws but no laws at all. 4) The answer to bad love is not good love but no love at all. 5) The answer to bad sex is not good sex but no sex at all. 6) The answer to bad politics is not good politics but no politics at all. 7) The answer to bad (false) religion is not good (true) religion but no religion at all (atheism). 8) The answer to irrationalism is not rationalism but outright insanity. And that’s exactly what anarchists are – lunatics and crazies who long ago failed in their ability to analyse any situation rationally.

The “Solutions” of the Crazies

What replaces government in the fantasies of anarchists? Right wing anarchists look to the magical, mystical, miraculous “invisible hand” of the “free” market. They might as well believe in the deranged, magical, mystical, miraculous “God” of Abrahamism, and of course most of them do. The left wing anarchists are even worse. They believe in peace, “unconditional love” and self-organising, “meritocratic” management systems whereby everyone magically, mystically and miraculously all organise themselves into the best management teams conceivable. Have you ever seen a meritocratic system spontaneously establishing itself? The idea that humans all intrinsically love and respect each other and would efficiently self-organise but for governments getting in the way and ruining everything is preposterous. It’s as ridiculous and pie-in-the-sky as the belief that treating everyone as equals was likely to work. Dream on! Anarchy, communism, libertarianism and free-market capitalism are all deluded and dangerous in the extreme. We all know what actually happens in an anarchy. We get “self organising” force taking over, i.e. the strong trample the weak into the ground, take what they want from them and enslave them. Violence and the triumph of the strong over the weak is the only spontaneous, self-organising system. Just go and live in the jungle to see how it works. That’s reality. Strong, effective, good, meritocratic government – Plato’s Republic, in other words – is the only thing that can save you and give you the life of which you have dreamt. History proves two things conclusively – right wing anarchy leads to rule by rich elites that rig the markets in their own favour. Left wing anarchists create a power vacuum into which “strong men” – right wing military dictators or right wing religious “prophets” – step. Anarchy always leads to rule by right wing elites: financial, religious or military. Take your pick of which masters you wish to be oppressed by. “Left wing” anarchy is a misnomer because it invariably leads to rule by right wing elites. Those who say, “Turn the other cheek” will have to do exactly that as they are struck by the masters whenever the masters like. How can “love and peace” ever defeat strength, force, hate and violence?

The Rich Man’s Mantra

Privatise profit and give it to the rich elites that avoid paying tax. Nationalise losses and give them to the masses that pay tax.

Anarchism = “Voluntarism”? A YouTube video by an anarchist said that anarchy had been completely misunderstood by most people and was nothing to do with chaos and violence. Instead, it was (allegedly) all about voluntary cooperation and self-organisation. The anarchist then proceeded to attack the concept of government and used exactly the same level of ignorance and misunderstanding about government of which she claimed anarchy was the victim. The version of anarchy she presented was essentially free-market capitalism but involving heavily armed individuals. The model of “perfection” she presented was reminiscent of the Wild West. Imagine a town without a sheriff full of small businesses run by people with big guns to “defend their property”. The Wild West was a joke in its own time. Can anyone point to any great cultural achievements of cowboys? Did they advance education, art, religion, philosophy, science, technology or anything other than capitalist greed, bank robbery, cattle rustling and gunfighting in the street? The idea that modern civilisation could be improved by resurrecting the small wooden towns of the Wild West is insane. How could cowboys build starships and bring us a Star Trek future? The anarchist vision is wholly backward. It encapsulates a grotesque idea of humanity as grocers with guns and Bibles who pay no taxes and bow to no authority other than God (to whom they bend right over and spread their cheeks as wide as possible; plainly, it’s not authority they find objectionable but human authority). It has no grasp of human nature and especially of psychopathy and the master-slave dialectic. Could the armed grocers of a small town beat a heavily armed gang of brutal killers who make their living by violently taking from others rather than by buying and selling groceries? Ninety-nine times out of a hundred, the villagers of the Magnificent Seven movie would be wiped out or made slaves. In that film, the villagers won only because they hired violent gunslinger mercenaries. Which rather proves the point. In real life, the gun slingers would have joined the bandits and terrorised the villagers.

Anarchism is predicated on the absurdity that government arose purely to allow a small elite to dominate everyone else. In fact, it’s anarchy that creates the situation in which such elites come to power and then dominate everyone else – exactly as depicted in the Magnificent Seven where warlord and bandit chiefs rule because there is no effective government, and the ordinary people are helpless. The message of the Magnificent Seven is that only violence wins. The gun slingers proved better at violence than the bandits, hence were victorious. Anarchy always reduces to a question of who has the superior force. It’s the opposite of civilisation and a healthy society. True government is about protecting the people from elites, crooks and bullies (who are often one and the same and ceaselessly spouting libertarian, anarchist mantras and hatred of the government and the State), and acting as the neutral judge that allows most people to get most of what they want and need in a structured, organised, effective way. In a world without government, nothing would stop the masters (who will seize what they want by pure force). Anyone who thinks that a Christian capitalist citizen militia can beat natural born killers is demented. The whole problem with anarchists is that they simply do not understand human nature and have no vision of human potential and of how much organising that potential needs in order to be actualised. People living in log cabins aren’t going to create paradise on earth. They won’t create a community of gods. If human beings are inherently selforganising, how come they have never established a viable anarchy? They have had plenty of opportunities. After all, the world has descended into anarchy many times. The answer to this chaos was never “self-organising voluntary associations” but government (Leviathan) backed up by force to impose law and order. If you haven’t grasped that yet, you’ve never read a history book in your life and you’re a total ignoramus and fantasist.

***** You will always get a warrior class: knights, ninja, samurai, Spartans, warlords, gunslingers, special forces, and so on, and they will always dominate the weak, soft, business people, traders, Christians, academics etc., unless curbed by government. That’s the simplest fact of life. That’s

the origin of the master-slave dialectic. Anarchy is what allows the warlords to seize control. It is not the solution, it is the problem itself. Look at American history. Was it government ships that went out and operated the slave trade? Or was it right wing “Christians”, capitalists, and entrepreneurs (anarchists and libertarians who hated government interference) who were responsible and who organised and profited from the whole thing? Who stopped this evil trade? It was the Federal government, of course, and it had to go to war to do so. The Confederates, who fought to uphold slavery, were exactly those who railed against government “oppression” and “tyranny”, and we see the descendants of these vile people still alive and kicking in the modern day in groups such as the Republican Party, the Tea Party, the 9/11 “Truth” Movement, the Ku Klux Klan and Ayn Rand’s anarcho-capitalist libertarians. Anarchy and libertarianism always end in the enslavement of the people to rich, violent elites. Government is the sole antidote to these monstrous, Satanic ideologies. Government is of course far from perfect and has been extremely heavily infiltrated and exploited by the super rich elites that advocate minimum government interference and negative liberty. The solution to bad government is, naturally, good government that faces up to the dynastic rich and puts them back in their box via 100% inheritance tax. What’s for sure is that anarchy and libertarianism is exactly what the super rich advocate and promote. All of those who adopt these positions are anathema and enemies of the people. All of these people are “Confederates” and they are rightly and justly opposed by the Union.

***** John Wilkes Booth, the assassin of Abraham Lincoln who denounced Lincoln as a tyrant, would now no doubt be lionised by the American right wing, by all the anarchists, capitalists, libertarians and conspiracy theorists, and hailed as a great hero and patriot who rightly struck down the head of the beast of government.

The Turner Diaries Neo-Nazi William Luther Pierce’s novel The Turner Diaries is known as the “Bible” of the American right wing. It portrays the overthrow of the American government and the eruption of a race war.

The Tea Party, the Republican Party, Christian Fundamentalists, the 9/11 “Truth” Movement, American conspiracy theorists in general, free-market capitalists and Ayn Rand’s anarcho-capitalist libertarians are all essentially racist and anti-Government. They associate Government with socialism directed towards helping ethnic minorities, hence they hate government because they are racists. If you are opposed to government you are extremely likely to be racist, xenophobic, a religious fundamentalist, utterly irrational and heavily armed. Left wing anarchists are not racist but they are extremely stupid. “None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.” – Goethe

The Jews According to the Jews, God created the universe and the human race and then, for no apparent reason, decided to make a sacred covenant with a small, provincial tribe called the Jews. Why didn’t God – perfect and infallible – simply create a Jewish human race, without foreskins?

The Muslims According to the Muslims, Allah created an entirely Islamic human race. Anyone who isn’t a practising Muslim is therefore an enemy of Allah and deserves to be killed. The twenty percent of Muslims in the world have declared war on the eighty percent of non-Muslims! When non-Muslims convert to Islam, they use the bizarre term “revert”, meaning that they have returned from apostasy and unbelief to their original state. It’s bizarre that the world got by extremely well until around 600 CE, without ever having heard of Muslims or Islam. The first Muslim wasn’t Abraham but Mohammed, who simply made the whole thing up as an Arab plagiarisation of Judaism and Christianity. Besides, if all the people before Abraham weren’t Muslims, how can it be claimed that God created a Muslim human race?

The Christians According to the Christians, God (Jesus Christ) sentenced humanity to hell for eating an apple and then had himself crucified to death on a cross to

save humanity from the sentence that he himself had imposed on them. Shouldn’t he just have changed his mind rather than making a human sacrifice of himself to himself? Isn’t Jesus Christ a lunatic who can’t admit making a mistake? No wonder Christians are so deranged. They worship a madman.

The Guardian System Saudi Arabia operates a paternalistic “guardian” system. Women, who are not allowed to drive and mostly wear black burqas, are treated as “minors” for their entire lives, unable to properly make up their own minds and always reliant on their “betters” – men. How any woman can be a Muslim defies belief. However, they obviously deserve to be Muslims and stuck in the corner in a burqa without a car given that this is the religion to which they have chosen to adhere.

Service The proper function of leaders is to serve their people. Throughout history, leaders have in fact served themselves. The Constitution of the Meritocratic Republic must declare that the most powerful people in society are the servants of society. If they refuse to serve the people, they cannot be granted any position of leadership or authority in society. This means that all capitalists purely out for themselves and their families will be stopped. They will never gain any power over the people. “But we are led by the least among us – the least intelligent, the least noble, the least visionary. We are led by the least among us and we do not fight back against the dehumanizing values that are handed down as control icons.” – Terence McKenna

Who Should Rule? Do you want to be ruled by governments or corporations? Democratic capitalism has led to the inexorable decline of government power and the equally inexorable rise in power of the corporations and the banks that fund them. Corporations are global and owe no loyalty to any State. They need satisfy their shareholders. Should your fate be in the hands of rich shareholders seeking a high return on their investment? They are interested in profit. They are not interested in you. Capitalist democracy is the death

of democracy. It’s all about the capitalism and nothing to do with the democracy. Capitalist democracy is exactly how you can fool all of the people all of the time. It’s exactly how the rich can hijack “people power” (democracy) and turn it into rich man’s power (capitalism). You have to ask yourself a very simple question – how can a system based on the interests of the people (democracy) be attached to a system based on the wealth of the few (capitalism) and still be coherent? The rich capitalists completely control democracy, so democracy is now just a mechanism for aiding the rule of the rich few, i.e. it’s anti-democracy and pro-oligarchy. Capitalist democracy was how the rich solved the problem of people power. They simply bought it, and the people were too dumb to notice. Capitalism is inherently oligarchic since only a few people ever control the bulk of the capital. Democracy and elections were the illusion the elite sold to the people to pretend they had some say in how the world is run. In a capitalist system, you have no say at all if you do not have any capital, and that’s true of ninety-nine percent of the people. So much for “people power”, one of the greatest con jobs of all time.

Right Wing Religion All religion is essentially right wing. The Church of England, for example, has three wings: High Church (similar to Catholicism), Middle Church (liberal) and Low Church (evangelical, Puritan and Presbyterian). The High Church is conservative and reactionary, hence right wing. The Middle Church is centrist, not progressive, radical or left wing. The Low Church is radical but promotes fanatical, intolerant, absolute Scriptural literalism, hence is extremely right wing. So, there is simply no left wing voice at all. There was a time when a left wing “liberation theology” was popular in Catholicism, and the Jesuits were initially left wing in many of their projects in South America. However, such ideas are never allowed to flourish and take over. The conservatives and reactionaries always win. If the Catholic Church were to openly advocate socialism or even Catholic communism, it would be out of business within one generation.

***** Why did the Puritans fail? Because they wanted to abolish all bishops and then even all priests. They were intent on destroying the hierarchy of the Church, and, of course, no hierarchy will permit that. In England, the

Puritans were persecuted, and many of them left – for America! Which is why America is a religious fundamentalist nation to this day.

Sabbath The Jewish Sabbath is Saturday. The Christian Sabbath is Sunday. The Islamic Sabbath is Friday. Did the Abrahamic God rest on three separate days? Did Abraham attempt to kill Isaac, or was it Ishmael? Was Abraham the first Jew or the first Muslim? If Jesus Christ was a Jew, why aren’t Christians Jews? Why did Muslims originally pray towards Jerusalem rather than Mecca? If Jerusalem is so important to the Muslims (it’s from where Mahound originally ascended to heaven), why don’t the Muslims simply become Jews? Abrahamism doesn’t make any sense at all. Relative to each other, Judaism, Christianity and Islam are all heresies, blasphemies, and apostasies.

The Busy World Everyone is busy. But busy with what? Certainly not with anything important or meaningful. People simply fritter their lives away on trivia and endless distractions. They are busy with nothing. The world’s successful people are those who are busy with something.

Agenda When you look at the people who run the world, you have a very simple question to ask yourself. Whose agenda are they serving? Is it the people’s or their own? If it’s their own, why aren’t they replaced by those who will serve the people, who will serve the General Will rather than the particular will? Why does humanity allow itself to be ruled by people who don’t care about humanity but only themselves? Imagine a world where the rulers had to prove to the people that they were serving the people. How many of today’s rulers would pass the test? None at all!

The Wolves Anarchists and libertarians present the government and State as a lupine conspiracy to force sheep into a pen to make it easier to devour them. Yet most anarchists and libertarians are armed right wing capitalists who are

straining at the leash to devour the weak and poor. They want the walls of the pen to be smashed down, they want all regulation and supervision of the pen to be removed, they want all laws concerning the pen to be abolished, they want all protection, all funding, all welfare for the sheep to be removed and guess what happens then ... every sheep is killed or enslaved by the gun-toting anarcho-capitalist libertarians. The sheep would need to be even more insane than they are at the moment to think that the end of government and the State would be their salvation. The only thing that can save them is government of the people, by the people, for the people – and that’s meritocracy, not capitalist democracy, and certainly not anarchocapitalist libertarianism.

***** It’s said that “big government” has take over the world. This is an absolute lie. All governments these days are extremely small and powerless. It’s “big business” that has taken over the world and is relentlessly pushing the globalist agenda of international capital. The world is completely ruled by banks, Wall Street, corporations and the “free market”. Anyone who thinks governments are in charge is mad. The whole problem with the world is that we don’t have strong governments willing to stand up to the rich elites and wrest power back for the people. Democratic capitalist “governments” are not governments at all. They serve capitalism, not democracy. They are poodles for the rich elites, and they never once challenge the rich elites. Who was it who created the 1% that dominate the world and own half of its assets? Was it government or capitalism? Wake up, fools! Go and read Karl Marx and learn the truth about capitalism and its global conspiracy to enslave the world. “Democracy” is simply the ingenious trick and con show the elite used to legitimise their tyranny and make the people believe they can chose their rulers. Here’s the simplest of all facts – the “market” runs the world and the ordinary person has zero say over the market. The voters of democracies all have a false consciousness – brainwashed into them by the controlling capitalist elites – and are too stupid to understand how the world works. Countless Americans despise socialism and communism despite never having read even one word of Marx. How can you hate something you know absolutely nothing about, other than by way of the propaganda constantly fed to you by the anti-Marxist capitalist elites? We are meritocrats and we are totally against Marxism; not because we know

nothing about it but because we have studied it in minute detail. Shouldn’t anyone who opposes Marxism have done the same, and, if they haven’t, of what value are their opinions based on 100% ignorance and prejudice? How can you be free unless you have correctly identified your enemy? The 1% are your enemy. We need meritocratic government that destroys this elite once and for all via 100% inheritance tax, and making it impossible for anyone to transfer significant wealth to anyone other than the Commonwealth – the wealth of the people, not of family dynastic elites. If you are on the side of the family, you support the rich family elites – the 1% – that run the world. If you are on the side of meritocratic government then you support the General Will, the Commonwealth and equal opportunities for everyone, no matter what background they come from. Meritocracy will abolish the rich privileged elite families – the Old World Order – that run the world. It’s time for the New World Order: government conducted on behalf of the people and not on behalf of the privileged elites.

Vulgus Vulgus (Latin): the common people, the commoners, the people of the lower layers of society, the proletariat, the plebeians, the crowd, the throng, the rabble, the mob, the multitude. Vulgar: common, ordinary, of or pertaining to the common people. Profanum vulgus: the unholy rabble, the profane mob, the vulgar masses.

Elites There isn’t a problem with elites. There’s a problem with the wrong elites. It’s a catastrophe for the world that right wing religious, military and financial elites have traditionally ruled the world. What is needed is rule by the left wing intellectual elite.

“Halal” Sex A Turkish entrepreneur has opened an online shop selling halal (“permitted”) sex products and sexual advice. Our advice? – haram (forbidden) sex is much more fun!

Simple Religion

“Islam is essentially a simple creed for simple men.” – G K Chesterton Islam is a religion devised by an illiterate tribesman called Mahound (Mahomet, Mohammed), and is a 100% plagiarised version of Judaism and Christianity. It’s a Jewish and Christian heresy and its audience has always been very simple people with no education. No genuinely intelligent person has ever been a Muslim. The handful of Muslims who have achieved any intellectual prominence in history would now be denounced as heretics, infidels and apostates ... and beheaded. Protestantism was established by an Augustinian monk – Martin Luther – who regarded reason as the Devil’s whore, who despised the pagan Greek philosophy present throughout Catholic Christianity and wanted to reduce Christianity to the simplest possible system – justification by faith alone, with no intellectual component whatsoever. All Protestants are as stupid as Muslims. Most conspiracy theorists, anarchists, libertarians and free-market capitalists are Protestants. The world would be transformed overnight if it embraced the Apollonian Religion (the Hyperborean religion of Illumination) – the religion of reason – combined with the Dionysian Religion of unreason and intoxication (for humanity at play). Imagine a world where you could worship both God and the Devil; God for work and the Devil for play. Imagine a religion that actually celebrated sin in the right environment – Sin for Salvation.

HyperAnthropos “Aristotle had described the magnanimous man, who is great and knows that he is great. But Aristotle would never have recovered his own greatness, but for the miracle that created the more magnanimous man: who is great and knows that he is small [Thomas Aquinas].” – G. K. Chesterton

Faking It Are you real, a fake, or a genuine fake? When you play a character all the time, you become that character. The persona – the actor’s mask – sticks, and then it can never be removed. Most people have become the masks and there is nothing real underneath. Most people are “presentational” and have no substance.

“We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful what we pretend to be.” – Kurt Vonnegut

Politicians There are presentational politicians and there are conviction politicians. There are liberal, conservative and radical politicians. There are puppet politicians, bought and sold. There are incorruptible politicians of profound principle. There are career politicians and functionary politicians. There are corrupt politicians, narcissistic politicians and psychopathic politicians. There are shallow and deep politicians. There are politicians doing it for the status, power and connections. What sort of politicians do you have?

Bad Identity People with a bad identity – such as Jews, Muslims, Christians and freemarket capitalists – have a moral duty and responsibility to abandon their identity and construct a new, healthy one. Anyone who clings to the identity imposed on them when they were infants by their parents and community is a failure as a human being. We must all reinvent ourselves and find our true identity, not any old identity that others foisted on us for their reasons and not for ours.

No Education “Education is what you get when you leave school.” – Anonymous “Education will never be as expensive as ignorance.” – Anonymous The education system is a disgrace. It’s designed in the image of the elite and its purpose is to instil the false consciousness in the masses that keeps the elite in power. The ordinary people are given an education designed for nothing more than to make them suitable to perform their roles as compliant drones in the factories and offices of the elite. We need a real education system, designed in the image of humanity, not of the elite. We need an education system that provides people with a true consciousness and that equips them to be the best they can be, able to defeat the elite.

Journalists

Journalists are vile, some of the worst people in the world. They are born liars. They are never interested in the truth, only in the “story”, the one that will win them a prize, a reputation and a fat salary. They have no interest in the victims of their stories. They are Mythos people, not Logos. It was the ancestors of journalists who wrote the Bible – nothing but a ludicrous, made-up story serving their own ends and vanity. Nothing has changed. We don’t need a “free press” to hold power to account and speak truth to power, especially since the media barons who control and manipulate the press are amongst the most powerful people there are and are never criticised or questioned by their lackeys and toadies. We need a Logos group of professional auditors, investigators and whistle blowers to control the people in power and expose their wrongdoings. It’s absurd that newspapers – Mythos rags owned by the elite – are regarded as something noble and helpful to the people. Keep your Woodward and Bernsteins. Keep your Assanges and Snowdens. We need people such as Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, Marx, Kierkegaard, Kafka, Derrida and Baudrillard to speak truth to power and expose their charlatanry and corruption. “I don’t like journalists. I despise them. They’re disgusting ... mainly the English. They’re pigs.” – Lou Reed “TV is the lowest medium there is. It’s completely inauthentic.” – Lou Reed

Top Ten Football Supports 1. Boca Juniors (Argentina) 2. Borussia Dortmund (Germany) 3. Glasgow Celtic (Scotland) 4. Raja Casablanca (Morocco) 5. Napoli (Italy) 6. Galatasaray (Turkey) 7. Athletic Bilbao (Spain) 8. Red Star Belgrade (Serbia) 9. Urawa Red Diamonds (Japan) 10. Saint-Etienne (France) Celtic only at No. 3? It’s all propaganda! Note that England has the most lucrative league in world football, and no fans in the top ten. The fat cats

and prawn cocktail brigade are too obese, rich, smug and lazy to have any passion.

Honest Scientists A survey showed that the public regard scientists as more honest and trustworthy than artists and clergy. But surely mathematicians are the most honest of all.

It’s Always Worse For You “It’s a recession when your neighbour loses his job; it’s a depression when you lose yours.” – Harry S. Truman Bad things are always worse when they happen to you. They’re never quite so bad when they happen to others. Welcome to humanity.

The “Genesis” Prize New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg has been recognised by Israel as the first ever recipient of the $1 million Genesis Prize, dubbed the “Jewish Nobel Prize”. (Isn’t the Nobel Prize for Jews anyway?) The Jewish Prime Minister will award the prize in Israel. Shouldn’t the Prize be awarded by its sponsor? – the Devil!

Humasexual? “I am not homosexual. In technical fact, I am humasexual. I am attracted to humans. But, of course, not many.” – Morrissey Why don’t you just say you’re “bisexual”, Morrissey?

Not Interested “I guess the terrible truth is not enough viewers are interested [in political TV dramas]. They should be. If you don’t have an opinion and don’t vote you have no right to complain about anything. Just shut up and pay your taxes.” – Actor David Tennant Well, Davis, why don’t you act in a TV political drama about how corrupt and moronic the democratic process is and how all voters are perpetuating

their own oppression at the hands of the political elites that own democracy?

Wikiflop The Fifth Estate, a Hollywood movie about Wikileaks and Julian Assange, flopped at the box office. As David Tennant says, people just aren’t interested in politics. “The government you elect is the government you deserve.” – attributed to Thomas Jefferson “People deserve the government they get, and they deserve to get it good and hard.” – H.L. Mencken

Thomas Jefferson Thomas Jefferson was a great Jacobin and Illuminatus – for his day, an extremely left wing thinker and politician. He hated government by banks, oligarchs and businessmen – and feared this was exactly where American politics was heading. Of course, he was entirely correct. Amazingly, right wing libertarians have commandeered Jefferson as one of their own. Many quotations attributed to Jefferson aren’t his, are fabricated or are taken out of context. Thomas Jefferson would have despised Christian Fundamentalists, the Tea Party, the Republican Party, Wall Street, rich man’s lobbying, the Washington D.C. oligarchic elite, the super rich, freemarket capitalism, and Ayn Rand’s anarcho-capitalist libertarianism. He was no anarchist, as evidenced by the fact that he formed a political party and was the third American President! Sadly, he did not have enough political support to make America the meritocratic, left wing Republic of which he dreamt. To all right wingers, stop quoting Thomas Jefferson. He despised you and your kind. You – all supporters of rich man’s privilege, cronyism and nepotism – were anathema to the great man. He was the most left wing politician in American history.

Reality TV Instant fame, followed by instant obscurity. Easy come, easy go.

Agreement People agree emotionally not rationally. We get people who say to us, “I was right with you until you attacked libertarianism. Government is the problem.” What they mean is that while we were saying what conformed with their pre-existing emotional biases, they were happy. As soon as we said something that contradicted this bias, they were against us. Now, we have presented countless rational arguments against libertarians and anarchists, but people simply don’t engage with reason and rational argument. It’s all about their emotions. Probably no more than 1% of the human race is responsive to reason, i.e. they encounter a system of superior logic and rationalism to the one they hold and, therefore, as a matter of reason, adopt the new and better system. Most people are “converted” emotionally and stay wedded to nonsense long after it has been rationally refuted. The whole of Abrahamism has been scientifically, philosophically, theologically and historically refuted and yet half the world still believes? Why? Because their identity and emotions are invested in their religious beliefs. Their reason is nowhere to be found. The same goes for conspiracy theorists. They are emotionally bonded to their conspiracies and no amount of rational debunking can ever change their opinions. They hate government and will cling to anything that reinforces this hatred, and reject anything that doesn’t. That’s the way human beings roll. That’s the tragedy of the human condition.

The Fifth Monarchists “The Fifth Monarchists or Fifth Monarchy Men were active from 1649 to 1660 during the Interregnum, following the English Civil Wars of the 17th century. They took their name from a prophecy in the Book of Daniel that four ancient monarchies (Babylonian, Persian, Macedonian, and Roman) would precede the kingdom of Christ. They also referred to the year 1666 and its relationship to the biblical Number of the Beast indicating the end of earthly rule by carnal human beings. They were one of a number of nonconformist dissenting groups that emerged around this time.” – Wikipedia

The Sick World

The Sick World is this World, the Devil’s World, the world of the Demiurge, the world of illusion and delusion, of evil, greed, selfishness and violence.

Jihad Jihad means holy war against all non-Muslims. Any Jihadist is a threat to anyone who is not a follower of Islam, the grotesque religion of submission.

The Niqab Should it be entirely up to a Muslim woman whether or not she wears a niqab? Given that she is bringing her extremely obnoxious religious views into the public space, isn’t it a matter for the entire community? You can be sure that if a person “freely chose” to wear a swastika in a Jewish area, or indeed any area, it would be regarded as something about which everyone, even the law, should have a say. Why should it be any different from the niqab? After all, it’s a symbol of Islamic extremism and fascism, wholly at odds with Western culture.

Verboten Forbidden fruit = forbidden knowledge, the most delicious, nutritious and powerful fruit of all.

The Dialectic MI: “Thesis, antithesis, synthesis... Triunity.”

Love and Hate “You can’t hate Truth because Truth doesn’t care if you like it or not. You can only embrace Truth because only Truth will make you stronger and change what is not right for you. You can’t love Lies because Lies don’t care for your well-being, and will eventually destroy you. Think about it.” – An anarchist WTF! Of course you can hate truth and love lies, or vice versa. These are emotional, subjective attitudes towards truth and lies, and are all about the people holding them, not about the things they are contemplating. The Illuminati are hated by many people. How would whether we cared or not

in any way affect their hatred of us? Truth isn’t a person with likes and dislikes, loves and hates. It has absolutely no connection with our emotional states. This is the sort of emotional, irrational gibberish frequently spouted by anarchists. Before you can either hate or love truth, you must first know what it is, and that’s immediately an insurmountable difficulty for irrationalists. What people imagine the truth to be has no necessary connection with what it actually is. What the person ought to have said is that your feelings have no connection with truth. Something isn’t true because you “love” it (such as the notion of Jesus Christ being God), and nor is something false because you hate it (such as anarchy being preposterous drivel).

Sparta The greatest army in human history was that of Sparta. The reason was very simple. The Spartans removed children from their parents at six years old, placed them in barracks and then trained them relentlessly to be the best soldiers there have ever been. Here we see the classic example of positive liberty, whereby the State steps into the lives of its citizens to the maximum degree and shapes and directs everything they do. The Spartans soldiers were the total reflection of the State, of its ethos, philosophy and modus operandi. To the Spartans, the modern notion of negative liberty, whereby citizens want the State to stay out of their lives as much as possible, would have been incomprehensible. True excellence comes only when the State and its citizens are a unity, with identical objectives. That can happen only in positive liberty States. Negative liberty States are fragmented, atomised, full of selfish, egoistic, greedy, self-obsessed citizens with no common purpose. They are all at each other’s throats, pawns in the various scenarios of game theory. Negative liberty goes hand in hand with free-market capitalism, consumerism and families ruthlessly competing with each other for resources and status. Sparta is as far removed from anarchy, libertarianism and free-market capitalism as it’s possible to get. The Spartans will remain vivid in the human memory forever, long after the anarchists, libertarians and freemarket capitalists have vanished without a trace from the historical record.

Excellence can reside in only two places – individual geniuses who succeed despite the mediocrity of those all around them, and States that harness their human resources to the full to transform them into wonders of the ages. Sparta, Athens and Rome all had active citizens serving the State. In modern capitalist democracies, the only function of the State is to provide the framework in which rich capitalists get richer and the masses indulge in consumerism and escapist fantasies fuelled by technology. In modern States, the interests of the rich are always the top priority. Modern States have no objectives concerning human excellence and the transmutation of the people into gods. The rich have no interest in any such agenda. They are perfectly happy with the way things already are: where they are the gods and everyone else bows down to them. Negative liberty, like anarchy and libertarianism, invariably results in rule by rich elites. The world does not have a problem with the power of government and the State. The precise opposite is true. Modern governments and States have had all their power removed by the doctrine of negative liberty and the world is in fact ruled by rich elites relentlessly serving their own selfish agendas, with enfeebled governments and States powerless to stop them. That, of course, is exactly how the rich elites planned things. Their No.1 priority was to destroy the power of the government and the State and they have succeeded beyond their wildest dreams. All anarchists, libertarians and free-market capitalists who oppose the power of government and the State are the best friends the rich elites have ever had. All of these groups are enemies of the people, and outright traitors. Only the positive liberty Meritocratic Republic – with absolute power (“Leviathan”) – can overcome the rich elites and allow the people to become the best they can be, with the full help of the State and all of its resources.

The Anarchists’ Civil War Left wing anarchists see themselves as doves being preyed on by a rapacious government of hawks. Right wing anarchists see themselves as glorious hawks being stopped from doing what they want (libertarianism)

by an oppressive regime of bureaucrats and functionaries with clear communist sympathies. Right wing anarchists are left wing anarchists’ worst nightmare. They would devour and enslave them. With supreme irony, the only thing that keeps left wing anarchists safe from the true hawks (right wing anarchists) is the government that they loathe so much. Talk about biting the hand that feeds.

Thirty-Three Many Christians believe that all dead people, no matter what age they were when they died, will be resurrected with the body they had or would have had at age 33. This resurrected body will be absolutely perfect. Why 33? Because this was the age at which Jesus Christ died and was resurrected. Even children that died in infancy would be 33 on Judgment Day. It would be very odd for children to meet their parents, grandparents, and so on, and find that they were all 33. What a bizarre world where everyone is exactly the same age.

Saint Christopher In the Middle Ages, it was said that, on any day, no one who looked at an image of Saint Christopher would die a bad death that day. Death would not come unexpectedly, without any chance for preparation and to make one’s peace with one’s Maker.

The Pestilence In the summer of 1348, the “Great Mortality” came to England. This was the infamous Black Death. By the end of the following year, almost half of the population of England was dead. In some places, whole communities were wiped out. To many, it seemed as though the world was ending. Is it even possible to imagine how traumatised the whole of Europe must have been by the Black Death? The decline of the Catholic Church began at this stage because it was able to do nothing to stop the pestilence, and countless priests, bishops and monks died along with everyone else. The Plague spared none, and cared nothing for status, position, virtue or holiness.

Platonic Love

“Platonic love is a type of love that is chaste and non-sexual. The term is named after Plato, who philosophized about the nature of love. Platonic love in this original sense of the term is examined in Plato’s dialogue the Symposium, which has as its topic the subject of love or Eros generally. It explains the possibilities of how the feeling of love began and how it has evolved—both sexually and non-sexually. Of particular importance is the speech of Socrates, relating the ideas attributed to the prophetess Diotima, which present love as a means of ascent to contemplation of the divine. For Diotima, and for Plato generally, the most correct use of love of other human beings is to direct one’s mind to love of divinity. “In short, with genuine platonic love, the beautiful or lovely other person inspires the mind and the soul and directs one’s attention to spiritual things. Socrates, in Plato’s Symposium, explained two types of love or Eros – Vulgar Eros or earthly love and Divine Eros or divine love. Vulgar Eros is nothing but mere material attraction towards a beautiful body for physical pleasure and reproduction. Divine Eros begins the journey from physical attraction i.e. attraction towards beautiful form or body but transcends gradually to love for Supreme Beauty. This concept of Divine Eros is later transformed into the term Platonic love.” – Wikipedia What is the problem with the world? It’s that too many people are in love with the worlds of feelings and the senses, and too few with the world of reason (the intelligible world). We need far more Divine Eros.

Bullshit How can you spot a bullshitter trying to con you? They always deploy Mythos. David Icke, for example, talks about shapeshifting, pandimensional alien reptilians running the world – pure Mythos. Look at the God Series – pure Logos. We have given ourselves nowhere to hide. We have presented the ultimate Logos theory – that of the God Equation – and now any smart person can attempt to rationally shoot us down ... if they’re smart enough. We can’t hide behind faith, stories, superstitions, holy scriptures, prophecies, propaganda or anything else. We are either right or wrong. It’s as stark, simple and brutal as that.

The Dunciad Q. Is the Internet A Modern-Day “Dunciad”.

A. So far, resoundingly yes! It’s where all the dunces hang out, except none of them think they’re dunces.

Killing Love “The man had killed the thing he loved And so he had to die. And all men kill the thing they love...” – Oscar Wilde, The Ballad of Reading Gaol “For each man kills the thing he loves, Yet each man does not die.” – Oscar Wilde “For he who lives more lives than one More deaths than one must die.” – Oscar Wilde

***** If no one “kills” you, no one loved you!

The Yes or No Game In the Yes or No game, whenever you are asked a question requiring action on your part, you must immediately answer yes or no (yes, you will do it, or no you won’t), and you can never change your mind. You must go through with your decision and you can never renege. You must honour and uphold your decisions, and be fully accountable for them, at all time. How would the world change if everyone routinely played the Yes or No game in every aspect of their lives? This game removes masks. It destroys ambiguity.

Subhuman The more rational you are, the less of an animal you are. The less rational you are, the more of an animal you are. So, feeling and sensing types are much more bestial than thinking and intuitive types. Feeling and sensing types are much more likely to have pets. Why? Because of their animal affinity! Believers in mainstream religion are much more likely to be feeling and sensing types. They are not truly human, more like a bridging species between animals and humans.

The Financial Madhouse

“Basically, financial history goes through two phases. You either have money existing like gold coins – tangible things that are in short supply – or you have virtual money that people create that is kind of like Monopoly money, imaginary money, where there is no constraint on just how big that money can be. There used to be a constraint on how much money could be created and that was the gold standard. Essentially central banks could only create money that matched the gold. That was abandoned about five decades ago and now there is no constraint.” – Gillian Tett The world’s GDP is 70 trillion dollars. The world’s debt is 210 trillion dollars. In other words, the world owes three times as much as it earns. Who provides the mortgage? The banking system of course. But the trouble is that not only do banks lend money, they also borrow money from each other and then lend that too. Before it went bust, Lehman Brothers had loaned out thirty-one dollars for every dollar it retained as cash. However, if anyone from whom Lehman Brothers had borrowed money then demanded it back at short notice, and Lehman Brothers couldn’t borrow from anyone else to cover its position, then Lehman Brothers might not have enough cash to pay its debts, hence be insolvent. And that’s exactly what happened in 2008. Lehman Brothers simply ran out of money, couldn’t borrow any more, needed a bailout and wasn’t granted one. It’s estimated that the total amount of money wrapped up in financial derivatives is 600 – 700 trillion dollars (no one’s exactly sure because derivative products are so complex). So, given that there’s already an enormous conventional debt bubble relative to global GDP, the derivative situation represents an even bigger bubble outside the first bubble. The world is on the verge of a financial precipice. The whole house of cards could come tumbling down at any moment. No one has any control or overview of the derivatives bubble. It’s wholly unregulated. And this is meant to be a sane, stable financial system! It’s about as mad as it could possibly be. JP Morgan has 90 trillion dollars of derivatives, i.e. one bank has more debt in derivatives than the whole global GDP. Aren’t you afraid ... very afraid?! One UK bank has debt of 400 – 600 % of UK GDP. Banks are totally out of control and that’s because free-market capitalism is totally out of control. What’s for sure is that this system is going down, and the meltdown

could happen any time now. When it does, free-market capitalism is finished forever. You think the powers-that-be know what they’re doing? It’s all propaganda. These people don’t have a clue, and they’re going to take us all down with them. “It is well that the people of the nation do not understand our banking system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution by tomorrow morning.” – Henry Ford The thing you have to understand is that we are being held to ransom by banksters. There’s not a single senior banker who shouldn’t be languishing behind bars. They’re a criminal conspiracy against the people, a Mafia operation.

The Real Reason “A person usually has two reasons for doing something: a good reason and the real reason.” – Thomas Carlyle Do people even know what the real reasons for their actions are? Most people in fact act for unconscious reasons and then use their consciousness to rationalise what they have done: to find a “good reason”. But often there is no good reason. Often, too, people have a “persona reason” for their conduct, i.e. a masked reason that accords with their public persona. The “ego reason” is the real reason behind the persona reason, but this is not allowed to be expressed. Our ego self is who we really are, while our persona self is who we are in public – an entirely different thing. So, we in fact have at least three reasons for doing something: an unconscious reason, an ego reason and a persona reason. Therefore, getting to the “truth” of someone is extremely complex. You can never take any “reason” at face value. It’s always a question of psychological “archaeology”. “If I were to say what I really think I would be arrested or shut away in a lunatic asylum. Come on, I am sure that it would be the same for everyone.” – Roberto Bolano

The Religious Thief

Islam is simply Arab Judaism. No honest person could study Islam without immediately concluding that it was just Judaism relocated southwards. Islam also shamelessly steals from Catholicism. What is Ramadan if not a blatant theft of the Catholic period of Lent. Let’s compare the two: Lent: the period of approximately six weeks leading up to Easter Sunday. In the Catholic Church, Lent lasts from Ash Wednesday until Holy Thursday, while other denominations run until Easter Eve. Lent traditionally involved fasting and praying but gradually became watered down until, today, people typically give up smoking or chocolate or alcohol for Lent. Lent echoes the 40 days Jesus fasting in the desert, enduring temptation by Satan. The day before Lent begins is Shrove Tuesday or Pancake Tuesday. In French, it’s called Mardi Gras (“Fat Tuesday”) since people eat fatty foods in preparation for the fasting of Lent. Ramadan: a month of fasting from dawn until sunset. Muslims not only refrain from eating and drinking, but also smoking, swearing and sex. Easter Sunday is the great Christian feast day at the end of the Lent period, and involves a great celebration. Usually, children are treated to delicious Easter eggs and a sumptuous family meal is prepared. Eid al-Fitr (“Festival of Breaking the Fast”) is the great Islamic feast day at the end of Ramadan, which celebrates the end of fasting, and where thanks are given to Allah for helping Muslims to practise self-control during Ramadan. So, we see that Eid copies the Christian festivals of Easter and Christmas and rolls them into one. Catholic Pilgrimage: Catholicism greatly encouraged pilgrimages and every country had numerous places of pilgrimage, associated with saints and holy relics. Hajj Pilgrimage: this is the one and only Muslim pilgrimage and it involves going to Mecca, birthplace of Mohammed and location of the Kaaba, an ancient shrine allegedly built by Abraham to honour Allah. Mohammed made sure he stole everything he could from Judaism and Catholicism to bolster his religion and make it credible, and to promote its brainwashing properties.

Festival of Sacrifice Islam has a second great festival day – Eid-ul-Adha (“Festival of Sacrifice”). This commemorates Abraham’s willingness to sacrifice his son Ishmael when God ordered him to do so. The “Devil” pleaded with Abraham to disobey Allah’s monstrous command, but Abraham violently drove him away by throwing stones at him. Just as Abraham was about to murder his own child, Allah stopped him. A lamb was then sacrificed instead.

Night of Power Lailat al Qadr – the Night of Power – takes place during Ramadan and marks the night in which the Koran was first revealed to Mohammed, regarded by Muslims as the most important event in history. This night is said to be better than a thousand months, and is the night that angels descend to earth. It’s an especially holy time, and most Muslims spend it in study and prayer. Some recite the Koran for the whole night. It’s considered an especially good time to plead to plead for forgiveness. At Eid al-Fitr, Muslims dress in their finest clothes, adorn their homes with lights and decorations, give treats to children, and visit friends and family. In other words, it’s extremely similar to Christmas!

Operant Conditioning The Abrahamic religions are all about operant conditioning. They makes sure they involve personal sacrifices and then deferred reward – pain and pleasure. Imagine Christmas and Easter being the day of maximum fasting, denial and hardship. Imagine getting no presents at Christmas but having to attend Mass all day long. Imagine Easter without chocolate eggs and a hearty meal, but with only porridge, Brussels sprouts and broccoli. Imagine Ramadan ending with a day of absolute fasting, and with everyone being forbidden to talk to each other. Well, that wouldn’t work, would it? It would break the rules of brainwashing. Capitalism isn’t remotely spiritual. It never wants consumers to deny themselves anything. Lent is simply unprofitable downtime for capitalism. Imagine the horror of millions of people giving up alcohol or chocolate – that would be a catastrophe for the profit margins, wouldn’t it?

No one would ever give their life for capitalism because it has only one note – consume. At all times, it promotes self-indulgence, self-gratification and instant gratification. It’s about the selfish, greedy, self-serving, selfobsessed individual. No “sacred cause” can be found with such people.

“The Jew” by Wagner “The Jew – who, as everyone knows, has a God all to himself – in ordinary life strikes us primarily by his outward appearance, which, no matter to what European nationality we belong, has something disagreeably foreign to that nationality. Instinctively we wish to have nothing in common with a man who looks like that. “The Jew speaks the language of the nation in whose midst he dwells from generation to generation, but he speaks it always as an alien. The general circumstance that the Jew talks the modern European languages merely as learnt, and not as mother tongues, must necessarily debar him from all capability of therein expressing himself idiomatically, independently, and conformably to his nature. ... But the Jew has stood outside the pale of any such community, stood solitarily with his Jehovah in a splintered, soilless stock, to which all self-sprung evolution must stay denied. “In his art, the Jew truly cannot make a poem of his words, an artwork of his doings.” – Wagner

***** The Jews: the wanderers, without any soil of their own, always seeking the “Promised Land”, always refusing to assimilate, always choosing to be “alien”, and always surprised when they are reviled. The Jews: the selfproclaimed elect of humanity, God’s very own Chosen People. The Jews: the maddest people on Earth, with the maddest beliefs on Earth. The Jews were the first to worship the Devil and call him God. The Jewish concept of monotheism was the greatest error and disaster in human history, and humanity has never stopped paying the price for this supremely toxic idea. The Jews suffer from the religious equivalent of the Dunning–Kruger effect: they are talentless individuals who rate their status and significance much higher than everyone else. The Jews were the first people in history to develop a wholly deranged superiority complex, with no conceivable basis in the facts of the world. The Jews were always a pathetic little tribe

surrounded by superpowers such as Egypt, Babylon and Rome. Unable to compete on Earth, the Jews decided that they would compete cosmically – by laying claim to the Creator of the entire universe and declaring themselves his Chosen People, prized above all others. Logically, the Jews should have left the world stage long ago. The fact that they are still here is testament to the degree of their collective psychosis. If you call yourselves the Chosen People, you had better be able to prove it. If you can’t, you can expect exactly the treatment the Jews have experienced down the ages. The most preposterous claims must be backed up by the maximum of force, not the minimum. The Nazis called themselves the Master Race and made a good fist of backing up their claims. The Jews also called themselves the Master Race despite being defeated by everyone all the time. Why do they persist with their manifestly disproven claims and beliefs? There is no Jewish God. They are not the chosen ones but, rather, the damned. That’s the lesson from history.

“Nice” God “So the sun stood still, and the moon stopped, till the nation avenged itself on its enemies, as it is written in the Book of Jashar. The sun stopped in the middle of the sky and delayed going down about a full day. There has never been a day like it before or since…” – Joshua 10:13-14 The Jewish God, allegedly commanded the sun to stop over a city to keep it lit up until the Jews had finished massacring its inhabitants. Is that the sort of thing “God” does? Does he pause the sun in its tracks to allow the complete destruction of the cities of the Jews’ enemies? (Er, does the sun move?! – what happened to heliocentric cosmology?) Where was this sunstopping God during the Holocaust? Isn’t it odd that the Jewish God hasn’t made an appearance since his Temple in Jerusalem was totally destroyed by the Babylonians? Wasn’t that where he died? Wasn’t that his tomb? Now the Jews simply worship a phantasm of their own devising.

The First Prophet According to Islam, the first prophet was Adam since he was the only man available to deliver Allah’s message at that time, hence was a prophet by default.

The Koran says that Allah chose Adam, Noah, the family of Abraham and the family of Amram above all mankind. So, no favouritism then! The Koran says that Allah made a covenant with Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and Mohammed. Interestingly, Noah’s words were mocked by his neighbours and he was called a liar (just as Mohammed was). It was even suggested that Noah was possessed by a devil when he was making his prophecies, and the same was said about Mohammed. Noah, like Mohammed, received a divine revelation. In Noah’s case, it was to build an Ark. One interpretations of the Flood asserted that Noah did not go into an Ark but, rather, a “luminous cloud” (a protective spiritual bubble, we might say – the protective force field of God). Well, why not? Why does God need Noah to build an Ark? Why not just save him using a divine miracle? Another interpretation said that the “Ark” was actually an Ark of Noah’s teachings, and those who followed them were saved and all the rest died. Or that only Noah’s followers were spiritually alive, and all the rest were spiritually dead and damned to hell. Another interpretation claimed that the Ark was really the Church, and everyone inside it would be saved. There was no salvation outside it.

The First Wino Biblically, Noah was considered to be the first wine drinker, the very first human to taste wine. And the first drunk!

Liberty Maximum Negative Liberty: Libertarians. Maximum Positive Liberty: Meritocrats. Libertarians think they know best, that they know better than the State and all of its experts. Meritocrats think the State knows best given that the State has access to the finest minds in the State and can utilize their gifts to the maximum. How would a libertarian in his Unabomber shack ever get access to smart people? If you’re smart, you realize something critically important – there are people smarter than you. If you want to become smarter, you must avail yourselves of their talents and that can reliably happen only in a

planned State. A genius might wander into a forest and meet a libertarian living in his shack, but that would be by complete accident .... and the libertarian would probably shoot him anyway! Libertarians are so dumb that they think they’re smart. If you don’t think anyone is smarter than you or that anyone can help you then libertarianism will certainly make sense to you – because you’re crazy! Libertarians argue that when people’s rights are respected, that is when an optimal society is achieved. That sounds eminently reasonable – apart from the fact that no one has universally defined the critical terms “rights”.

The Dead Ruling Over the Living Does a rich man on his death bed have the right to grant his riches to someone of his choosing? ... an act that will give the inheritor a decisive advantage over others that he did nothing to earn. The dead are thus able to have power over the living and control the world of the living, something that Thomas Jefferson always railed against. Libertarians, many of whom greatly admire Jefferson and even, bizarrely, claim him as one of their own, would never accept a rich man’s goods being appropriated by the State on his death. Yet that is the only means by which a fair society of equal opportunities based on merit can be achieved, and how the dead can be prevented from wielding post mortem power. A dead person ought to have no rights ... he is no longer a player in the game. To allow a rich dead person to have the post mortem right to give a decisive advantage to his chosen ones via inheritance is to say that we should be ruled by the dead – by the rich dead – and that is 100% antimeritocratic. Everything comes down to rights and rights must be those that promote equal opportunities and merit if we wish to have the fairest, most just, best society. Only in a rational, meritocratic State can “rights” be properly defined. Any “rights” that have any connection with the Abrahamic God are automatically false, and any that have any connection with Mammon – the God of money are property – are every bit as false. Libertarians define rights with regard to negative liberty and meritocrats with regard to positive liberty. Their respective definitions of rights will

therefore, in many cases, be the direct opposites of each other, yet both will make exactly the same claim that the optimal society is one where people’s right are fully respected. The issue is therefore one of who is best and most rational at defining rights.

Text and Subtext French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu argued that elites in a society do not maintain their power simply by controlling the means of production (cash and assets), but also by dominating the cultural discourse too. They define a society’s intellectual map, its cultural and social values, and even its “soul” (or lack thereof). Capitalism isn’t all about financial capital. It also reflects cultural, social, human and symbolic capital. The elite capitalists who run the world control all of this. This absolute control leads to the value system of the elite being internalised in everyone who is part of the system. This means that a stage is reached when what is openly stated and discussed is no longer telling you much, because it already presupposes an underlying system that is left unstated, or even completely ignored. The “text” of society always reflects a “subtext” but this subtext is never addressed and challenged. Text is like the tip of an iceberg while the subtext is all the rest, beneath the surface. Bourdieu wrote, “The most successful ideological effects are those which have no need of words, and ask no more than a complicitous silence.” Abrahamism operates in such a way. Its mentality is so deeply ingrained – even in those who reject it – that it subtly dictates all of our attitudes. Many atheists are humanists, and humanists are effectively Christians who don’t believe in Christ, i.e. they still subscribe to the whole Christian vision, but without worshipping Christ. When Nietzsche launched his all-out attack on Christianity in The Antichrist, he certainly didn’t leave any room for continuing to play the Christian game but without the Christian God. He demanded the revaluation of all values. That is, we would have to look at the whole iceberg – text and subtext – not just the text while leaving the subtext completely intact (which is what so many atheists, skeptics, agnostics and humanists do).

Mohammed – Not a Prophet?

As the Jews pointed out, Mohammed was never foretold, and was the subject of no prophecies. Mohammed never performed any miracles and nor did he predict the future.

Prophets Are prophets the maddest people in human history? Without a shred of evidence, they claim to be divinely elected and to express the direct word of God. In the modern day, all of them would be placed in mental asylums. Is it not extraordinary that much of humanity places its absolute faith and trust in individuals who would now be diagnosed as severely mentally ill? No wonder our world is a psyche ward! Jerusalem isn’t a Holy City but an insane City. It’s where reason has been wholly abandoned and madness rules unchallenged. “The whole religious complexion of the modern world is due to the absence from Jerusalem of a lunatic asylum.” – Havelock Ellis “Had there been a lunatic asylum in the suburbs of Jerusalem, Jesus Christ would infallibly have been shut up in it at the outset of his public career. That interview with Satan on the pinnacle of the Temple would alone have damned him, and everything that happened after could but have confirmed the diagnosis.” – Havelock Ellis “The place where optimism most flourishes is the lunatic asylum.” – Havelock Ellis “A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything.” – Friedrich Nietzsche “An asylum for the sane would be empty in America.” – George Bernard Shaw “It’s been my policy to view the Internet not as an ‘information highway,’ but as an electronic asylum filled with babbling loonies.” –Mike Royko

Mohammed – Messenger/Prophet A prophet is a person who speaks for God, who foretells, who is a divinely inspired preacher. He’s God’s interpreter or spokesman.

The Quran chiefly addresses Islamic Prophet Muhammad as “Messenger” and “Messenger of Allah” (Quran 48:29), and asks people to follow him so as to become successful in the afterlife (Quran 3:132). Islamic scholar Muhammad Shafi Usmani said God created three ways in which humans receive knowledge: 1) the senses. 2) the faculty of reason. 3) divine revelation. We might say that the senses give us science, reason gives us metaphysics and mathematics and divine revelation is what we associate with faith. However, given that divine revelation contradicts the senses and reason, it’s clearly false. It’s pure Mythos and has no connection with reality. As ever, we fall back to the Platonic dualist system: the sensible (scientific) world on the one hand and the intelligible (metaphysical and mathematical) world on the other. It’s fascinating that no Jewish prophets described themselves as the “last” prophet. It reveals how egomaniacal Mohammed was that he styled himself as the Seal of Prophets (God’s very last prophet, hence the most important, the one delivering the last communication from God). In Islam, to deny that Mohammed is the last prophet is to merit the death penalty. All Muslims believe that the sequence of divine revelation came to an end with Muhammad. Hence, a million years from now, the Koran will still be Allah’s last word. How many people then will still be taking Allah seriously – someone they haven’t heard from for a million years? Well, none at all. Mohammed was a narcissist and egoist, determined that no one else should ever rival his glory and importance and so he deliberately set out to make it impossible for any Muslim to surpass him. It was very clever for Mohammed to call himself the seal of prophets and thus for the Koran to be the last word – cutting off any future changes, and making Mohammed’s elevated status as God’s messenger permanent. The Koran is asserted to be the verbatim word of God, the last word of God, the final revelation. One has to wonder why God had to make several attempts at his revelation in the first place, using several prophets. Why not just one prophet and one revelation, explaining everything forever? Why

bother with a string of Jewish prophets, before inexplicable switching to an Arab prophet to be the most important prophet of all? Muslims believe that not Mohammed but Allah was the founder of Islam. Why did Allah not simply appear to the world and declare his message? Why use these bizarre intermediaries – these strange prophets? It makes no sense at all.

Son of God Jesus Christ – allegedly God himself – never calls himself God but rather God’s Son, a wholly different concept. Sons of God where everywhere in the ancient world. Ancient Greek myths and legends are full of them. Alexander the Great called himself a son of God. With Jesus, we apparently have God present amongst us on earth and yet he makes no Godly announcements – nothing you would associate with a true God who had created everything – and gets himself crucified by the Romans, who seem more powerful and Godlike than he does!` You have to say that if Jesus Christ was literally God talking to us, he didn’t do a very good job. How can “God” be so unconvincing? The Torah, Bible and Koran are desperately unconvincing to all rational people. In fact, they’re irrational nonsense.

The Wife Beaters Here are six translations of the Koran’s incendiary verse 4:34 1) “Men are superior to women on account of the qualities with which God has gifted the one above the other, and on account of the outlay they make from their substance for them. Virtuous women are obedient, careful, during the husband’s absence, because God has of them been careful. But chide those for whose refractoriness you have cause to fear; remove them into beds apart, and scourge them: but if they are obedient to you, then seek not occasion against them: verily, God is High, Great!” (Rodwell’s version) 2) “Men have authority over women because God has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because God has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them. Then if they obey you,

take no further action against them. Surely God is high, supreme.” (Dawood’s version) 3) “Men are in charge of women, because Allah has made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah has guarded. As for those from whom you fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them. Then if they obey you, seek not a way against them. Lo! Allah is ever High Exalted, Great.” (Pickthall’s version) 4) “Men are the managers of the affairs of women for that God has preferred in bounty one of them over another, and for that they have expended of their property. Righteous women are therefore obedient, guarding the secret for God’s guarding. And those you fear may be rebellious admonish; banish them to their couches, and beat them. If they then obey you, look not for any way against them; God is All high, All great.” (Arberry’s version) 5) “Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in their sleeping places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great. (Shakir’s version of the Koran) 6) “Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient, and guard in (the husband’s) absence what Allah would have them guard. As to those women on whom part you fear disloyalty and ill conduct, admonish them (first), (next), refuse to share their beds, (and last) beat them (lightly); but if they return to obedience, seek not against them means (of annoyance) for Allah is Most High, Great (above you all). (Ali’s version) So, there you have it in black and white: men are superior to women and are entitled to beat them, control them, criticise them, rebuke them, oppress them – all by sacred decree of Mohammed and Allah.

Lying to Yourself Islam is unquestionably sexist, patronising, paternal and patriarchal – just look at how it operates. Who has all the power, and who is covered up and left at home? The Koran openly states that women are inferior to men and men are allowed to beat them. Rationally, all Muslim women should reject and denounce Islam. However, no practising Muslim women are rational, so they have to invent all sorts of ways to explain why Islam is wonderful for women. Yes, it’s cognitive dissonance again. Insanely, they claim that wearing a burqa is empowering, liberating, and that they are choosing to wear it rather than being ordered to wear it (although most of them then admit that they interpret the Koran as mandating the wearing of the burqa). They say that they love being in the home rather than in the workplace. They say that they don’t need education because the Koran contains everything they need to know, and so on. People can explain away absolutely anything to themselves! Muslims are the masters at it.

Jehovah and Allah It’s interesting that, in the Torah, Jehovah is forever intervening on behalf of Jews. In the Koran, Allah never once intervenes on behalf of the Muslims. That said, Allah influences everything. Anything he wills, happens. So, the lack of success of Muslims must have been willed by Allah!

Oracles and Prophets From the point of view of Abrahamic prophets, pagan oracles must be charlatans, and vice versa. How are we supposed to test their rival claims?

Cynthia McKinney “You make a commitment that you will vote to support the military superiority of Israel—the economic assistance that Israel wants, that you would vote to provide that. ... Every candidate for Congress at that time had a pledge, they were given a pledge to sign… If you don’t sign the pledge, you don’t get money. For example, it was almost like water torture for me. My parents observed this. I would get a call and the person on the other end of the phone would say ‘I want to do a fundraiser for you.’ And then we

would get into the planning. I would get really excited, because of course you have to have money in order to run a campaign. And then two weeks, three weeks into the planning, they would say, ‘Did you sign the pledge?’ And then I would say, ‘No, I didn’t sign the pledge.’ And then my fundraiser would go kaput.” – Cynthia McKinney According to former Georgia Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney, the proZionist lobby has a stranglehold over Congress. She revealed that during her years in Congress, candidates for both the House and the Senate were requested to sign pledges of support for Israel, promise to provide consistent levels of economic aid to the Zionist state and vow to support Jerusalem as the permanent capital of Israel. If you didn’t sign the pledge, you wouldn’t get campaign funding. Thus it’s no mystery why American foreign policy is so pro-Zionist. Isn’t Israel’s influence over America’s politics actually illegal? Shouldn’t it be banned? When you allow your nation to be dictated to by foreign powers, you are a traitor!

Power “Mark well my poem. It contains the world’s beginning and its end.” – Wagner The Ring of Power can be forged only by someone who renounces love. Is that not the basis of capitalism?

Ideas Ideas change the world because ideas inspire action. Action leads to change. Without ideas, there can be no change.

Democracy When Lycurgus, the legendary lawgiver of Sparta, was asked to make Sparta a democracy, he said, “Begin with your own family.” For all those people in capitalist nations who revere democracy, we say, “Begin with the corporations you work for.” Corporations run our world and yet are supremely anti-democratic. If democracy is so good, why don’t corporations use it?

“Politics is the art of preventing people from taking part in affairs which properly concern them.” – Paul Valery

The Teenager A teenager is trapped between pre-coital anxiety and post-coital depression.

The Gothic The Gothic is represented by ancient, ruined abbeys, monasteries and castles. Religiously, the Gothic stands for Catholicism – the “old ways”, no longer recognised and practised. In Protestant countries, Catholicism was repressed by the State, and yet was visible everywhere – in the form of ruins. The ruins stand for sin, hell, guilt, superstition, magic – all the things not banished by the Reformation or Enlightenment. The Gothic is the return of the repressed.

***** In Hammer horror movies, vampires bite and are highly sexual. In the Twilight series, vampires are reluctant to bite and often chaste. They are repressed vampires.

The Right Wing Right wingers in free-market democracies see the State as malign. They endorse corporate power over State Power. They are “market” fundamentalists, like religious fundamentalists. Right wingers: anti-State, anarchic, individualistic and economically liberal but also conservative, moral, religious, and traditional. Devoted to the individual and family. No interest in others.

The Point Who needs you? What have you done with your life? What’s the point of you?

Post-Capitalism

In 1989, the Berlin Wall fell and communism was effectively over. We entered a post-communist world. In 2008, Lehman Brothers fell and capitalism was effectively over. The major financial institutions were bankrupt and had to be bailed out by taxpayers (socialism). We are now in a post-capitalist world, seeking the next economic system. It’s likely to contain elements taken from both socialism and capitalism, and no one should be surprised by this. We advocate “social” capitalism, which is about the people, not the elite, being in charge of capitalism and its levers.

***** Big business says it’s about “enterprise”. What a loaded word! To those who do not swallow their propaganda, it’s about legalised crime, cronyism, privilege, cartels, rigged markets and monopolistic practices to maximise profits for the super rich.

“Nobody knows anything.” Screenwriter William Goldman famously said about the movie business, “Nobody knows anything.” But couldn’t we say exactly the same thing about mainstream religion, economics, politics, science ... just about everything. The only people who know anything are mathematicians and that’s purely because mathematics is pure tautology. Bizarrely enough, tautology is the basis of existence. Only things that are tautologically true can be true at all. Only tautological foundations of the cosmos can be unshakeable foundations. Only mathematical tautology is eternal.

“A Piece of Cloth” When Muslim women who wear the niqab are challenged, they often say, “It’s just a piece of cloth. It doesn’t harm anyone.” If it’s just a piece then why do they wear it religiously? Plainly, these people see it as essential to their identity and religion. Therefore, the “just a piece of cloth” is the last thing these people truly think about the niqab. That makes them outright deceivers and liars – just like their prophet and their God.

Moderators and Control Rods in Nuclear Reactors

Control rods absorb neutrons and allow the reaction rate to remain relatively constant rather than leading to an out-of-control chain reaction. Moderators slow down neutrons, which leads to a greater number of successful fissions. Therefore, they don’t slow the reaction down but, rather, facilitate it.

Love and Strife In ancient Greek, “eros” is love and “eris” is strife. It’s fitting that only one letter should separate them.

***** At the top of the ladder of love is the Platonic Form of Love.

Westboro Baptist Church – True Christianity! “We preach hate because the Bible preaches hate.” “Every human, at the moment of birth, utterly deserves to go straight to Hell.” “All in all, if you’re claiming to be a Christian, but you deny what the Bible says about God and His hatred of all workers of iniquity, then you’re dealing with the scripture in a whorish manner.” “God hates fags.” “Santa is a fag.” “A a fag is a Jew, pretty much.” “Lesbians are just female fags. God hates them, too.” “Thank God for Katrina.” “Thank God for dead soldiers.” “Just like the priests, Santa will rape your children at night.” [Regarding American soldiers] “These turkeys are not heroes. They are lazy, incompetent idiots looking for jobs because they’re not qualified for honest work.”

“The Jews killed Jesus. That fact will never change. They have never repented, and they try to bully into silence anyone who states that fact.” “God hates Israel.” “Jews are the real Nazis.” “Obama is the Antichrist.” “Mohammed was a demon-possessed whoremonger and paedophile who contrived a 300-page work of Satanic fiction: The Quran! Like America’s own whoremonger and paedophile wangled his own hokey Book of Mormon!” “Italy is a nation of mobster-breeding perverts.” “Priests rape boys. They are all going to Hell.” “It’s a sin to pray for America.” “Hurricane Rita is an answer to the prayers of the suffering saints of Westboro Baptist Church.” “The red on that flag stands for fag rectal blood.” “The Roman Catholic church is the largest, most well-funded and organized paedophile group in the history of man.” “This is the hypocritical, fag-infested, fag-run United States of America and we’re supposed to respect that fag rag flag?”

***** Well, they’re not always wrong!

***** “If God did exist it would be necessary to abolish him.” – Mikhail Bakunin

Read or Recite “The angel came to him and asked him to read. The Prophet replied, ‘I do not know how to read.’ The Prophet added, ‘The angel caught me (forcefully) and pressed me so hard that I could not bear it any more. He then released me and again asked me to read and I replied, “I do not know

how to read.” Thereupon he caught me again and pressed me a second time till I could not bear it any more. He then released me and again asked me to read but again I replied, “I do not know how to read (or what shall I read)?” Thereupon he caught me for the third time and pressed me, and then released me and said, ‘Read in the name of your Lord, who has created (all that exists) has created man from a clot. Read! And your Lord is the Most Generous.’ Then Allah’s Apostle returned with the Inspiration and with his heart beating severely…” – Sahih al-Bukhari “Read! (Iqra) In the Name of your Lord, Who has created (all that exists) … Read! (Iqra) And your Lord is the Most Generous, Who has taught (the writing) by the pen [the first person to write was Prophet Idrees (Enoch)]” – the Koran (Hilali-Khan) Islam starts with a miracle. Before you can become a Muslim, you must accept this miracle. The miracle is that Mohammed was illiterate and hence, supposedly, incapable of authoring the Koran. (Although, of course, he could simply have made it up and dictated it to scribes. You don’t need to be able to write in order to be an author.) Right from the outset, we are in baffling territory with Islam. It’s completely unclear what happened when Mohammed was in the cave with (allegedly) the Angel Gabriel. We don’t know if he dreamt that he encountered the Angel (i.e. he was asleep), or if encountered a vision of the Angel while he was awake. Since the Angel asked him to read, we must presume the Angel had a book with him (presumably a ghostly rather than physical book). In fact, the book he had with him was the Koran itself, of course, already pre-written (copies are available in heaven, it seems). Given that Mohammed couldn’t read, it was somewhat remarkable that he should be chosen for this vital task. Couldn’t Allah find a literate Arab? Not exactly an advert for Arab educational standards. We’re supposed to believe that despite not being able to read, Mohammed miraculously went ahead and read the book the Angel Gabriel had with him. The question arises as to why Mohammed wasn’t simply handed a copy of the heavenly Koran and asked to deliver it to the people of Mecca. Isn’t that what messengers do? Wouldn’t that have been much more miraculous and also much more persuasive? (And, on the same line, why did Joseph Smith, prophet of Mormonism, fail to produce the Book of

Mormon, and instead give the world his “divinely inspired translation” of it?) Being unable to write, Mohammed couldn’t transcribe the heavenly book to any pieces of parchment. So, to prevent errors, we must presume that Mohammed had some kind of aural eidetic memory (he had a photographic memory of the book Gabriel showed him, and a perfect memory of reading it, as Gabriel had ordered him to do). Mohammed gathered scribes together and then dictated the Koran to them. (Is this the most inefficient process ever devised? One would have thought that Allah had a cleverer plan.) To be frank, this sounds like the most outrageous fabrication since the “Virgin” Mary told the world that the Angel Gabriel (him again!) announced she had been impregnated by God. Why was it important for Allah to use an illiterate (moron) to deliver the Word of God? Why not use a prophet who could read rather than one with a perfect memory for dictation? It all seems a bit, er, improbable. In fact, the story is so hard to believe that the Koran actually anticipates that people are going to have a hard job swallowing it: “Those who disbelieve say: ‘This (Koran) is nothing but a lie that he (Mohammed) has invented, and others have helped him at it, so that they have produced an injustice and a lie.’ And they say, ‘Legends of the former peoples which he has written down, and they are dictated to him morning and afternoon.’” – Koran 25:4-5 The disbelievers are completely correct of course, and the whole thing is just a copy of the Jewish Bible (with elements of Christianity) for an Arab audience. What we can now glean is that the Koran wasn’t complete when Mohammed first met Gabriel, and things were added to it to help out Mohammed and “big him up”. One might almost imagine that Mohammed was writing it as he went along (which he was, of course) and brazenly pretending that Allah was composing verses on his behalf. Why is Mohammed mentioned at all in the Koran if it’s the Word of God? Why does the messenger matter? Unless the messenger is actually the author! It’s beyond belief that 1.5 billion people in the world subscribe to this absurd concoction. Mohammed himself must have been amazed that anyone took it seriously.

If Allah himself thinks that people are going to accuse Mohammed of being a fantasist and liar, why didn’t he try to come up with something more convincing? Why didn’t he appear on top of the Kaaba with the Koran? He’s God, isn’t he?

Who The Devil Are You? Islam is an abomination, the purest Devil worship you can get. The Koranic is truly the Satanic Verses, authored by a mind of absolute evil. Consider the tale of the first Muslim (according to the Muslims) – Abraham. Abraham was ordered by “God” to sacrifice his son Ishmael. Shaitan (Satan) pleaded with Abraham to spare his boy. Why is God God and Satan Satan? Shouldn’t they be the other way around? Shouldn’t a loving, compassionate, merciful God be the one who defends life against killers and shouldn’t Satan be the hateful, callous, merciless monster who gives shocking and evil orders – exactly those that were given to Abraham? Isn’t the tale of Abraham, Ishmael, Allah and Shaitan the worst case of mistaken identity in the whole of history? Why wouldn’t anyone other than a Devil worshipper conclude that it was the being calling himself “Allah” that was actually the Devil, hence the other being was God. What we know is that Ishmael didn’t die in this horrific incident. Why shouldn’t we conclude that this was because the being wrongly identified as Shaitan made sure that no harm came to the boy. He begged for the boy’s life and when Abraham refused to spare the boy, he intervened directly to stop him. The traditional version of the story makes no sense. God would a) never give an order to a father to kill his innocent son – nothing could be more wicked, and b) never change his mind since that would imply error and whim – and God neither makes mistakes nor behaves erratically and whimsically, and c) God never breaks his contracts since that would make him a liar, hence not God – and the tale of Abraham is clearly that of a broken contract where God made a contract with Abraham for the execution of Ishmael and then repudiated it. God cannot break a contract. If God gives an order, it must be carried out. Otherwise, why should anyone ever do what God commands? If God changes his mind, as he supposedly did in this notorious episode, then God is unreliable, untrustworthy, dishonourable, fickle and unpredictable.

Nothing that did “God” did in the tale of Abraham and Ishmael is remotely Godly, hence this cannot be the True God, but an impostor. Thus, the Koran is authored by the Devil, and Mohammed is his Satanic prophet ... the false prophet who lies to the human race and corrupts and damns them with the Satanic Verses. 1.5 billion Muslims have believed the Devil, got on their knees to the Devil and are going straight to hell where they will be with their Satanic Lord forever. Muslims like to sneer at Christians for believing in the Holy Trinity. They think they are more “logical” than Christians. Yet what on earth is logical about worshipping a God that orders human sacrifice, and then changes his mind, having already caused irreparable psychological trauma?

***** Would the Devil ever call himself the Devil? Wouldn’t he always call himself “God”? How would Abraham know he was talking to “God”? How would Mohammed know he was talking to the Angel Gabriel? Someone isn’t God just because he says he’s God, or the Angel Gabriel just because he says so. “God” is to be judged by his conduct, not by the name he gives himself – and no moral God would ever order human sacrifice. Nothing could be more certain. Therefore, the “God” that gave that order to Abraham is not God but his opposite. The fact that Ishmael survived the murderous order should be taken as evidence that the True God intervened to stop Satan and Abraham from carrying out their wicked plan. The Hajj pilgrimage involves a ceremony where Muslims pelt three pillars (which represent “Shaitan”) with stones. The whole ceremony should be inverted. Muslims should shower the pillars with flowers and get on their knees to “Shaitan”, for he is the True God malignantly misnamed by the false God (Allah = the real Shaitan). The Muslims should save their stones for pelting the Kaaba, the symbol of Shaitan himself. Every copy of the Koran – the Satanic Verses – should be burned. The True God calls on all Muslims to abandon their infidelity, apostasy, heresy, and Devil worship. The True God requires all 1.5 billion Muslims to repent – or suffer eternal damnation for choosing human sacrifice over life, for obeying a God that orders death over one that pleads for life. To make such a staggering error is beyond belief. How anyone can think that God orders fathers to murder their children shows how sick and evil human beings are. They cannot

identify that which is most holy. Instead, they bow to that which is most unholy – the Devil himself.

***** History is written by the victors. God stopped the Devil and Abraham from killing Ishmael, but Mohammed rewrote what happened to present Shaitan as the hero, and to call him “Allah”. All the while, it was the Devil who was speaking to him, dictating the Satanic Verses to him – and all 1.5 billion Muslims have swallowed the lie and chosen to drink with the Devil. Mohammed was a revisionist. He wrote the Devil’s version of history.

What Happened to the Prophets? The plague of prophets hasn’t ended. The difference now is that most of them end up in mental asylums, correctly diagnosed as the lunatics they are. They’re all sedated now rather than writing holy texts. Yet a few of them have escaped the madhouse and made lucrative careers out of lying about the Illuminati. David Icke, Alex Jones, Henry Makow and Benjamin Fulford are all modern prophets, spouting gibberish to the credulous, moronic masses. The prophets haven’t gone away and nor have the dumb mobs they prey on.

When The Gods Fall Silent The Gods cannot be heard when reason reigns. Reason is freedom from false Gods, false Prophets and false Scriptures, and dumb conspiracy theories.

Stating the Bleeding Obvious JD: “You do realize that you’d need to gain that merit and that won’t be possible for the vast majority of the world due to economic imbalances, right? I’m all for putting the most qualified person into the position he/she best fits in... but you’ll need money to become qualified... and if only the qualified make the money then you’re kind of fucked.” We’d be really dumb if we didn’t realise that. Why don’t you try reading our material before opening your big mouth? What do you think 100%

inheritance tax is all about? What do you think is the whole point of equal opportunities? A lazy person who comments before studying is no meritocrat. You ought to know what you’re criticising before you criticise.

Merit How is merit to be judged? There is no absolute standard. The fair way is simply to give everyone with expertise in an area a equal vote and let them decide by democratic election. That’s the only proper use of democratic elections.

The Success Mythos Most success can be attributed to luck, corruption or a rigged system. Almost all stories of success are fraudulent. The “successful” person is deemed to merit his success. It’s never attributed to his just getting lucky, or being the beneficiary of a system that’s designed to make some succeed and the rest fail, regardless of merit.

The Optimism Mythos Leaders, coaches and entrepreneurs are unusually optimistic. Would a president, CEO or business guru be convincing if he were a “Dr Doom”, permanently wringing his hands? Why did no one see the 2008 financial meltdown coming? Because all people in positions of power were optimists. Pessimists (realists) – those who knew what was coming – were systematically marginalised and excluded from senior positions. Their warnings were all ignored. Optimist always ignore pessimists, just as pessimists never believe optimists. Boom and bust are the inevitable consequence of rule by optimists and the depiction of pessimists as party poopers and gloom mongers. Wall Street and Washington D.C. are full of optimistic people from wealthy, privileged backgrounds who have had it easy all their life, hence always expect the best outcomes.

The Confidence Mythos Most journalists, commentators, politicians, pundits, analysts and CEOs are extremely confident. Confident people are opinionated, assertive and

dominant. They make extremely confident, articulate predictions, and no one ever bothers to check the accuracy of what they say. Every senior figure involved with the economy should have been fired in 2008 since not a single one of them predicted the meltdown. The point here is that the penalties for wrong predictions, or for failing to predict what’s coming, are negligible or non-existent. Failure is therefore incentivised. You get rewarded for making wrong predictions and you are not penalised when they are proved wrong. The most overconfident people – those we see most regularly on TV – are precisely those worst at seeing what’s really coming. They are both overconfident and overoptimistic.

Blindness Most people have no idea how little they know. If they did, their confidence and optimism would be shattered. The most confident and optimistic are frequently the most ignorant, the least self-aware, the poorest at criticising themselves. They are blind to their own failings. They are blind to their own blindness.

Who Guards the Guards? The Deconstruction of Morality The Stanley Milgram Obedience Experiment proves that people will readily obey people in authority, even when ordered to do things extremely harmful and even fatal to others. The ultimate authority figure that people obey is “God”. Abraham was the first example of the Stanley Milgram phenomenon since he was the first to slavishly obey the murderous order of an authority figure. Whenever Abrahamists read about the Milgram experiment, they should bear in mind that they themselves are part of the two thirds of the human race that would kill others if ordered. In fact, the Milgram experiment was redundant. The Torah, Bible and Koran already enshrine its findings. The Islamic Hajj pilgrimage is literally a homage to obedience (and “Islam” actually means submission [to authority]). It even involves a ceremony for casting stones at anyone who pleads with you not to obey an authority figure commanding you to do horrific, deadly things.

In the tale of Abraham and Ishmael, the figure that pleads for Abraham to disobey and thus save his son’s life is named “Shaitan” (the Devil), the essence of evil. Why should we be surprised by the Milgram experiment, by the Nazi murderers who were “only obeying orders”, when obeying authority mindlessly and slavishly – even to the point of murdering your own children – is the primary message of humanity’s “holiest” texts? At the Nuremberg Trials, it ought to have been Abrahamism and its God that were on trial. Of course, most of the judges and prosecutors were themselves evil Abrahamists obeying that twisted morality! The question immediately arises – whom do those in authority obey? Do they see themselves as Gods, as the arbiters of what’s right and what’s wrong? Who appointed them? In the Stanford Prison experiment, students were randomly assigned roles as prisoners or guards. Within days, the “guards” had become total sadists, and the prisoners were abject, depressed victims. Isn’t that the way our whole culture operates, with the Old World Order as the sadists in charge, and the rest of us as their prisoners and slaves. Who guards the guards? Who’s watching them? People are known to be much less moral when they are unobserved. Observation always makes people more likely to obey the law. Bizarrely, even painting eyes on walls can cause a reduction in crime in the vicinity. The concept of the “panopticon” – a circular prison designed so that unseen guards in a central tower can observe every prisoner – was intended to make prisoners more obedient. CCTV fulfils a similar function. The ultimate representation of the panopticon is of course “God” – who is supposedly watching all of us all of the time. Many people will not behave badly because they are so afraid of God’s retribution. Another primary influence on people’s “morality” is groupthink, conformism, doing what everyone else is doing. Any behaviour – including murder and rape – becomes “acceptable” if everyone else is doing it. In fact, pressure is then imposed on those people not doing it to do it. If, as we have seen in history, everyone else is killing witches, Jews, blacks, gooks – the “other” – why aren’t you? You could find yourself accused and murdered too if you resist the tide. So, “morality” often means doing what everyone else is doing even when it’s totally immoral. Morality is simply group behaviour, group rules, group customs. Over half of the world’s population endorse religions that

openly advocate adults murdering their own children if “God” orders it! You really couldn’t make it up, could you? Something that is absolutely immoral – by any sane, rational standards – is openly advocated by billions of people simply because billions of people advocate it. If no one advocated it, no one would do it. Abrahamism could disappear overnight if all the rest of the world said that Abrahamists were Devil worshippers – because then the Abrahamists would actually have to think about what they’re doing rather than just doing what they do because all of their fellow Abrahamists are doing the same.

The Old World Order The Old World Order are the authority figures, the Gods, the panopticon guards, those who set the “moral” agenda, those who watch everyone else. But who’s watching them? Who guards the guards? Why did the 2008 financial disaster occur? It was because no one was watching the elite. There were not subject to any regulation or supervision. They were allowed to do whatever they liked. And, instantly, the elite adopted their own self-serving, groupthink “morality” – their own “customs and practices” – whereby they could do anything they wanted with other people’s money, take any risks they liked and flagrantly reflect “moral hazard”, which is defined as the “lack of incentive to guard against risk where one is protected from its consequences, e.g., by insurance.” The elites are wholly insulated from consequences. They are the one who define consequences – for others, not for themselves. Once again, who guards the guards? Who sets the morality that the guards must obey? Who enforces this morality? In our society, it’s self-evident that no one does. The elite at all times seek to have supervision and regulation removed from them. Free-market capitalism and anarcho-capitalist libertarianism are all about removing government and the State – and thus all control – from the capitalist arena. How can anyone delude themselves that unrestrained capitalism (and anarchism for that matter) would not lead to the most immoral consequences of all? All moral restraint would be removed and the elites would do whatever they like without even the possibility of consequences. The capitalism of the nineteenth century was of this type. Little children were sent up chimneys seven days a week to maximise profits for capitalists. Human beings were reduced to slaves. It was

communism and socialism, and the threat of violent revolution, that changed things. Society must have rational rules and laws that apply equally from top to bottom. In fact, a case could be advanced that more rules and laws should be applied to the guards and elites rather than fewer. i.e. the people running the world should be the most supervised of all, and all their financial affairs and social networks fully visible to everyone else. They should be subjected to the “synopticon” system, i.e. everyone watches them, as opposed to the panopticon system where they watch everyone else.

The Decline and Fall of Politics Politicians are subjected to round the clock scrutiny. The 24/7 media machine means that politicians always have to worry about doing or saying anything controversial. So they don’t. The vast majority of politicians are bland centrists with nothing of interest to say. The political process cannot achieve anything meaningful. No radical changes can ever happen. The media storm that follows any serious challenge to the status quo ensures that all such challenges are obliterated. The media commentators are in charge, not the politicians, and the commentators are all hired by, and working for, the elites. Who guards the guards? The people genuinely in charge are those prominent figures who are never subjected to intense, 24/7 media scrutiny. These people always deny that they have any power. (“The more powerful the class, the more it claims not to exist.” ― Guy Debord) The elites are those who do not stand in the glare of the media, whose business and private affairs are never crawled over. Only they have the space to make radical decisions without being hysterically challenged. And their radical changes are all designed to radically favour themselves – which is exactly why a tiny proportion of human beings own half of humanity’s assets. There is one golden rule for understanding our world: Follow the Money. When you follow it all the way to the end, you find the “guards without guards”, i.e. those who are running the whole show.

Who Guards God?

In Plato’s religious system, “God” is subject to the eternal, perfect Form of the Good. “God” cannot do whatever he wants if he wants to be called God and not something else. As soon as God partakes of the Form of the Bad, he cannot be God. So, God is constrained by a criterion external to him. What happens when this constraint is removed, as it is in Abrahamism? Now God himself becomes the definition of good and evil. What he does, no matter how evil, is “good” and whatever is opposed to him, no matter how “good” is evil. That’s how Abrahamism operates. In Plato’s religion, God could never order a father to murder his son since this is a 100% contradiction of the Form of the Good. This action belongs 100% to the Form of the Evil (the Satanic Form). In Abrahamism, “God” gives precisely this order and people fall on their knees to him to worship him. They are not worshipping “God”, they are worshipping Power, and, in our world, power is most often associated with evil. God is about goodness, but Satan is not about evil; he’s about power.

***** In our world, no Platonic laws are applied to constrain the “guards” – the Gods, the elites. Like the Abrahamic God, they can do whatever the like, no matter how psychopathic. Medieval monarchs slaughtered anyone who opposed them. Their opponents were wrong simply because they were opponents. So, even if the opponents were saints advocating civil and human rights, and “freedom and democracy”, they were still wrong and evil because they were opposing the will of God’s anointed one, hence opposing God himself. Do you see what a huge difference it makes when the definition of “good and evil” is invested in a “person” rather than in Forms or a Constitution? The United Kingdom has no formal Constitution because, in the past, monarchs in England and Scotland were absolute rulers who could do whatever they wanted. Whatever they did, no matter how mad and evil, was legitimate because God appointed them and God can do no wrong. Whatever they did, it was with God’s approval, hence they could never be guilty of any crime. Charles I found it incomprehensible when Parliament and Cromwell’s New Model Army put him on trial for treason against the English people.

As far as he was concerned, he could never be wrong (he was as infallible as the Pope), and only God could sit as his judge. This is effectively the stance of the ruling elite. They believe that they are God’s anointed (that’s why they’re the elite; that’s why they’re so rich and powerful) and “goodness” is invested in their persons. Anyone who opposes them is ipso facto wrong and deserves to be crushed.

***** The Abrahamic religious model is inherently evil because it commits a fatal assumption that anything God does must be good because God himself is the personification of good. But that means that all Abrahamists are then committed to agreeing that God’s command to Abraham to perform human sacrifice – the most vile and evil command imaginable – must, somehow, be “good”. Plainly, no moral justification whatsoever can be offered for this command. If a Nazi officer ordered a Jew called Abraham to murder his son called Isaac, the Nazi would be regarded as diabolical, and the father would be expected to give his own life to save his son. Yet, if the Nazi officer calls himself Jehovah, Jesus Christ or Allah then apparently there’s nothing wrong with the order and Abraham is expected to carry out the deed to prove the strength of his obedience and belief. How on earth can changing the identity of the person giving the order change the Satanic nature of the order? Killing your children by someone’s else’s order is either good or evil. It can’t depend on who gave the order. Why do Abrahamists refuse to accept moral responsibility for their actions? They will kill their children if “God” orders it, but fight to the death to resist the order if a Nazi gives it. How can that make any sense? Why not simply call God a Nazi and a monster? In a Platonic system, a Constitution of Laws would say that no one under any circumstances could order a father to murder his son. Anyone who did give such an order would instantly be a criminal facing the most serious prosecution. And that’s exactly what should have happened to “God”. Abrahamism itself should be placed on trial for being the Gospel of Satan, defying any conceivable moral code.

*****

All tyrants have always modelled themselves on the Abrahamic God. Hitler regarded everything he did as right and everyone who opposed him as wrong – exactly the same as Jehovah. A sane world is one that stops these monsters from imagining they can get away with anything. We must guard the guards. We must subject them to a Constitution and ruthlessly enforce it. We must be prepared to enforce it against God himself!

***** Just as we can’t let the individuals who rule us go unguarded and free from our regulation and supervision, nor can we let the systems the elites use to rule us go unguarded and free from our regulation and supervision. Above all, free-market capitalism must be brought under full public control and accountability. Wall Street must bow to Main Street. The banking system must be run by the people, not by private elites. Anything else is lunacy.

What’s in a Name? In the UK, the Labour Party describes itself as “democratic socialist” while the Liberal Party describes itself as “social democratic”. What’s for sure is that the Labour Party long since stopped advocating any kind of socialism, so has now become social democratic. In which case, why hasn’t it vanished or merged with the Liberal Party? The answer is that both Parties are run by careerists who don’t stand for anything other than their own selfadvancement. All political logic and integrity – in every nation on earth – has vanished.

Rallies In Nazi Germany, a political rally was about pure propaganda, and the projection of total power. Look at the use of bold colours – red, white and black, and the use of dark and light. Look at the arrangement of flags and banners. Look at the slogans used and the set up of the stage. You could tell that politics meant something, that it was the authentic source of power in Germany. Now consider modern political rallies. Unthreatening pastel shades are everywhere. Everything is intended to produce enthusiasm but no intimidation. Boring speakers with nothing to say are allowed to take the

stage. The audience wear silly hats and carry silly little flags. The note that is struck is one of amateurish comedy rather than any serious projection of power. No one takes these rallies seriously. What is the message being proclaimed loud and clear? – politics is not where the power is. The real power is out of sight, behind the curtain. They do not want to be seen. They want to control while being free from scrutiny. Politicians are simply the feeble and deluded front men for the puppet masters.

Double Dealing The UK Labour Party had spin doctors who spent their time spinning against their own colleagues! Traders at JP Morgan complained that their trading positions were being sabotaged by other traders ... working for JP Morgan! Well, with friends like those...! These people would feed their own children and mothers to the lions.

The Peter Principle The Peter Principle is the notion that employees within a hierarchy will advance to their highest level of competence and then be promoted to and remain at a level at which they are incompetent. In short, “Employees tend to rise to their level of incompetence.” If this principle is applied to society, we find that all of the members of the elite have been promoted beyond their level of competence. The reason they are still in power is that no organisation on earth has ever addressed the Peter Principle and taken direct action to demote or dismiss all those who have been promoted beyond their level of competence. In a meritocracy, the Peter Principle must be right at the top of organisational thinking. Everyone will know that if they get promoted and then can’t function effectively in their new job, the only way is down. There will be no sinecures. The inept will not be left in post, enjoying fat salaries for being useless.

The Inverse “Propaganda, to be effective, must be believed. To be believed, it must be credible. To be credible, it must be true.” – Hubert H. Humphrey

Is this the most absurd statement of all time? It’s the inverse of the truth. Christianity is believed. Does that make it credible and therefore true? Only a ridiculous politician could argue that credibility is the basis of truth. Most “credible” things are incredible! “Propaganda does not deceive people; it merely helps them to deceive themselves.” – Eric Hoffer “To swallow and follow, whether old doctrine or new propaganda, is a weakness still dominating the human mind.” – Charlotte Perkins Gilman “It’s so easy for propaganda to work, and dissent to be mocked.” – Harold Pinter

The Propaganda of Fear “Our country is now geared to an arms economy bred in an artificially induced psychosis of war hysteria and an incessant propaganda of fear.” – Douglas MacArthur Fear is the essence of propaganda. That’s why hell and damnation are at the heart of Abrahamism.

The Propaganda of Hate “Why is propaganda so much more successful when it stirs up hatred than when it tries to stir up friendly feeling?” – Bertrand Russell Propaganda is invariably about getting one group to fear and thus hate another group.

***** “Let them hate so long as they fear.” – Caligula Only the supremely powerful can get away with saying that!

The Propaganda of Consumption “There is massive propaganda for everyone to consume. Consumption is good for profits and consumption is good for the political establishment.” – Noam Chomsky

Free-market capitalism is wholly based on the propaganda of consumption. This propaganda industry is called Advertising!

The “Wealth Creators” The elite refer to themselves as wealth creators and continuously threaten to leave any nation that does not treat them well and defer to them. The capitalist financial catastrophe of 2008 proved that these people are in fact wealth destroyers and job annihilators. Far from the State bending over to do their bidding, the State should be deporting them or jailing them. The myth of the elite has been exposed for all to see, yet their propaganda goes on, and most people are still buying it.

Rumour and News It has been said that the internet is replacing news and fact-checked reports with rumour, gossip and hysteria. In fact, it’s replacing propaganda created by the elite with propaganda created by the mob. On the internet, it’s possible to bypass all of the elite’s gatekeepers and achieve a wide audience. However, just as the elite were never bothered about quality and truth, neither is the internet mob.

The Pop Idol President If the American President were elected through the internet – via YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and so on – would it be any worse than the President being elected via the present system of party politics (the politics of the elite), the elite’s media and lobbying machine (the elite’s propaganda), and corporate donors (the elite’s financial power)?

The New Gatekeepers The elite have traditionally controlled propaganda via gatekeepers – agents, middlemen, publishers, editors, commissioners, selection committees, and so on. All of these people are employed to a) make money, and b) to promote the cultural capital of the elite (the elite’s value system). On the internet, new gatekeepers have appeared, and they are of a much more populist ilk. YouTube will sign up “partners” on the basis of how many fans they have. YouTube is driven by profit alone and is not

concerned with promoting the elite’s propaganda. Applied all across the internet, this spells the end for the elite. Their obsession with profit and wealth has finally caused them to bypass their own gateway system and go straight to the public. But without their gatekeepers, their cultural influence will fade away and perish. And then they will be replaced by some dumbeddown populist movement.

Adam and Eve “...Those two, in paradise, were given a choice: happiness without freedom, or freedom without happiness. There was no third alternative...” – Zamyatin Abrahamists have all chosen “happiness” over freedom. Muslims openly follow a religion called Submission (“Islam”). Freedom means nothing to these people.

Lawyers “Don’t forget that we lawyers, we’re a higher breed of intellect, and so it’s our privilege to lie. It’s as clear as day. Animals can’t even imagine lying: if you were to find yourself among some wild islanders, they too would only speak the truth until they learned about European culture.” – Zamyatin Lawyers: professional liars, like politicians, advertisers and preachers.

The Niqab Women who wear niqabs – symbols of abject submission to authority and of personal slavery – often claim they are “empowered”, “liberated” and making a free choice (although they wear it only because they believe the Koran orders them to do so). This is classic cognitive dissonance. When you are wearing chains, you either admit you are a prisoner, or you simply deny that you are a prisoner and make up a reason why the chains are a symbol of personal liberty.

The Enemy The Old World Order say, “We are surrounded by Machiavellian intriguers, men of low birth, men of vile birth. We alone stand against the barbarians at the gate. We are civilisation. After us, the deluge.” They have bought their own propaganda. That’s always a fatal mistake.

Follow the Money “There are two things that are important in politics. The first is money, and I can’t remember what the second one is.” – Mark Hanna

Nike Nike calls its internal bureaucracy “The Matrix”. Everything has to be approved through The Matrix. Everyone is asked, “Did you run it by the Matrix?” George Orwell got inspiration for his dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four from the exasperating bureaucracy of the BBC. Room 101 – the room of the greatest horror imaginable – was a conference room in BBC HQ where Orwell had to endure endless, soul-destroying meetings! All corporations become vast, sinister bureaucracies whose function is to perpetuate the power of the bureaucracy rather than achieve anything worthwhile. Yet exactly the same can be said of the privileged dynastic elites. Once they have “made it”, their only function is to “keep it”, and that means to stop you getting it. The equation couldn’t be simpler or starker. Their success is your failure. You cannot succeed while they are stopping you from succeeding. Privilege – nepotism and cronyism – is all about keeping the money and power in a tiny, highly controlled little circle. Invitation only. Talent is no calling card. Brown nosing is. The elite all suffer from the “Peter Principle” – they have been promoted above their level of competence. Now their task is to prevent the more talented from replacing them. They deliberately deploy the “negative selection principle” whereby they promote incompetent sycophants who pose no threat to them and will do everything to protect them. And that’s why there’s so much ineptitude, stupidity, corruption and psychopathy at the top of society. It’s well-known that whenever Wall Street encountered any competent regulators, they simply hired them and paid them ten times more! So, the regulators who were left behind were the inept ones who couldn’t see the target from one step away. That’s why regulation in such a system is pointless. If you want proper regulation, your regulators have to be better paid and more highly qualified than those they are regulating. Isn’t that blindingly obvious? But if you don’t want to catch the crooks, you make sure the cops are as dumb as possible!

Behind the Gilded Curtain – A Hollywood Insider Blows the Whistle “In real life, the most dangerous villains rarely advertise their malevolence.” – K “If people would understand this (I didn’t get it until I was hit in the face with a frying pan a million times), it would really help. They don’t understand that the devil is wearing a fancy suit in the White House and on Wall Street – and that his brother runs Hollywood (literally!). I was brainwashed into thinking there is a little bit of good in everyone (NOT “the spark may be buried but it is not activated!!” – a very important distinction!!) and that everyone is hurting … when in fact they are attacking your Will and trying to make you their slave! “In real life, the most dangerous villains rarely advertise their malevolence.” – IN FACT, IT’S THE OPPOSITE. THEY ACT LIKE YOUR BEST FRIEND, your boyfriend – and your government! Everything is backwards.

The View from the Top I somehow worked my way “to the top” only to see this: it’s not lonely at the top ... it’s PURE EVIL. No one ever told me The Top = Evil. I saw how these people, who have the unlimited and UNMERITIED resources to change the world, CHOOSE to live JOYOUSLY in putrid, narcissistic excess while everyone else suffers. One of them (I dated) and his sister told me, “No matter what you do you will never be ‘one of us’ or considered successful because ‘your money is new’. Marrying into our family is the only way to be somebody. You will never have what we have. There is nothing you can do about it. You have to be born into it. So you might as well give up.” I said, “But that’s not true. I’m working and earning things.” They said, “NO YOU ARE NOT. IT’S IMPOSSIBLE.” (What kind of assholes say that?!) I told him (the douchebag I am now embarrassed to admit I was dating), “There is nothing you can give me that I can’t get on my own.” With that statement I set off the most volcanic eruption of pure vitriol from one human being I have ever seen in my life. What is it that is so scary to them

about that statement? They already have 100 million dollars! Why are they so threatened, I wonder? The Lie hit me smack in the face and I never felt so alone in my life because even my mom (who knew I had talent) told me I didn’t have “blue enough blood” (whatever that means) to make it and that I would never be able to have money. What? Their blood is better than mine too? I didn’t believe her, but when I saw it first hand, I was devastated. I thought what is the point of life if you can’t earn anything? Especially when you already earned it and they tell you they didn’t! And these people DO NOTHING ALL DAY! All this guy did was play golf, watch TV and eat McDonald’s hamburgers (believe it or not). They make absolutely no contribution to society. I saw it with my own two eyes! They actually enjoy doing nothing all day. And all they do is talk about their money and where they stand in the pecking order. It’s revolting. They say, “That guy is worth this much, that guy is worth that much.” In reality, these people are worthless, spineless parasites terrified of losing their privilege. I can say this to anyone who is dreaming of being in their circle. As fate should have it, even though I was not born into privilege, I have flown around the world on private jets, ridden in limousines, stayed in mansions, vacationed on an island paradise quarterly at a private estate, been to the White House, been to parties in Monaco’s royal palace with Prince Albert, been backstage with rock stars, been to movie premieres on red carpets, met pretty much every major “celebrity”, been to the Super Bowl, the Olympics, on the set of movies, eaten lobster and caviar, travelled in delegations and have been to every major awards show. Here is the bottom line: the whole thing is shockingly disappointing and nauseating, and it hurts to the core if you have one iota of compassion for any other human being. Their behaviour is completely unacceptable. AND NOTHING IS AT IT SEEMS. I literally fell asleep at the Oscars and almost gagged on my saliva (it’s the most boring parade of self-congratulatory creeps I have ever seen.) And I cried everyday when I was in “paradise” with the OWO boyfriend I had (because I saw what they were NOT doing with their money). And they were so mean spirited. Believe me, I was reminded of where I came from and where they came from (Hell! lol) every single day. It’s like they were watching me at all times to make sure I remembered I was not one of them. It felt horrible! And evil. I was crying in paradise! Who does that? I kept thinking, There must be more to it. What am I missing? But I think

what they really live for is for other people to NOT have what they have. And being told that “earning money is impossible because you have to be born into it” and to know they feel happy about saying that was devastating. It was horrible to hear someone say something so cruel. It broke my heart for humanity. I was so excited to get to “the top” and I thought I could inspire people and that those at the top would want to help me to make things better for people. But they don’t. They did everything possible to prevent me from becoming successful that way. I always remember thinking, Why don’t these celebrities use their power to help people? To change things? Why would someone with such a disproportionate amount of wealth not help people? And why would they keep it all to themselves? Who needs that much money? And not charity! That is BS. It smacks of, “I need to make myself look good and justify that I can keep excessive amounts of money while other people suffer.” At these Hollywood “parties”, no one talks to each other! Every photo is staged! And you can be at this “A-list” (puke) party and think, Wow, I made it in, I’m cool. But they even have a way of keeping you out of the party when you are in – they have a VIP room! We will let you in... but we still won’t let you in, SUCKER! At a big film festival, some people I know paid $100,000 a night for the “best table” at the “best nightclub”. This is not a typo. They spent $100,000 a night on a table at a nightclub for 10 days in a row. And a POP UP night club at that. It’s not even a real building, it’s a fucking tent with a rented dancefloor! So that is 100K x 10 = ONE MILLION DOLLARS! Just to feel important! They ordered $40,000 bottles of champagne and even sprayed some of them on each other. I almost threw up when I saw that. Do you know how many schools they could have built with that money? Some psychopath actually said to me, “You have no idea what you’re getting into. I work with millionaires and billionaires. I could have you killed and no one would find your body.” (What charm school did you go to, buddy?) His eyes were completely black and his face was frozen like the Joker or a clown where the (creepy) smile is drawn on his face. How do you respond to that? (Run!) Well, I said, “I’m not getting into anything. I am throwing parties. Maybe we can help each other. Maybe you can help me and I can help you. We can work together.” His eerie reply was, “There is nothing you can do to help me.” It was so chilling because what I saw was a

teeeeeny tiny piece of something in all of the black smoke swirling in his eyes that was saying, “It’s too late. I already sold my soul.” It was so spooky. There is nothing you can do to be equal in their eyes. If you make money, it’s “new money”. And I worked at a PR firm where pretty much everyone was Jewish and every intern drove a Mercedes. I knew something was wrong with the world when 21-year old interns ALL drive Mercedes. All of them! And why is everyone in Hollywood Jewish, I asked? It was very suspicious. It’s right in front of everyone’s eyes for all to see. Everyone in Hollywood is Jewish and they are related to everyone on Wall Street, who is Jewish, and they are married to Washington D.C. and the media. When one brother is the president’s advisor and the other brother the most powerful Hollywood agent, and they are from Israel (with a father who is a member of a terrorist organization), why doesn’t that make anyone ask questions? It’s even in Wikipedia! And how about this … I gave this guy a 5-page marketing plan for licensing a product, based on a well-earned college degree and my 20 years of hard-won experience working for Fortune 50 companies. Do you know what he said to me when I asked him what he thought of it? ... “I didn’t read it. I want to know whose office you can walk into and get a big hug. Who do you know?” WTF??? A hug?? This isn’t grandma’s house! I mean when it comes down to it doesn’t SOMEBODY have to know what they are doing? Someone somewhere must have talent and good ideas, surely. The “who you know” thing is so grotesque and, believe me, I have “connections” but a hug over talent and merit? It’s embarrassing! These people are jackasses. I figured out early on that you have to know people so I did what I had to do but it seems to be getting out of control. People won’t even give you the time of day if you don’t have the right connections. I have been told I have a “million dollar rolodex” (gag!). But I also have talent to back it up. They do not want talent. It’s almost forbidden! They are terrified of talent and merit. It’s like a bunch of wild animals that get scared and attack you. “She has merit! Let’s kill her!” Nobody has believed me up until now! Now people are starting to listen to me. Finally!

***** So there you have it. That’s the personal testimony of “one of us” (one of the people) breaking into the charmed circle of the rich and being shocked and appalled by what she found there. That’s what it’s like when a person with a soul enters the soulless kingdom of the Undead – the rich, bloodsucking vampires who feed on us. It can’t be stressed enough that the rich HATE YOU. They have zero interest in your welfare. To them, you are invisible (total nobodies and nonentities) or mere factory fodder or office drones. Your only function is to service the capitalist machine that makes the rich richer. You must buy and keep buying. You must consume the things that make the rich even more powerful. You are a mere commodity, to be bought and sold. The “market” will determine your value. You have no intrinsic value. The rich rule via an “invisible hand” – the market. If you want a chance in life, you must make this hand visible ... and chop it off! The rich are a cartel who have rigged the game in every way against you. You cannot succeed with them in charge. You must overthrow them. You have no choice if you want a good life, a life as anything other than a “last man”, waiting for crumbs to fall from the Top Table. “Old Money” must be destroyed via 100% inheritance tax and anti- trust fund legislation. By the same token, “New Money” cannot be allowed to become Old Money, so they too must be prevented from transferring their wealth to their chosen ones. We don’t mind anyone getting rich on the back of hard work, talent and good ideas. We don’t mind them enjoying luxury and the fine life as their reward. What we do mind is when they try to pass it on to others who haven’t earned it, who will then have power over us despite being lazy and talentless. We’re sick to death of the Paris Hilton brigade ruling the world and running it into the ground. Do you want Paris Hilton (inherited wealth) or Plato (world-historic genius) in charge? Isn’t that the ultimate nobrainer? Inherited wealth is the ultimate sin – the true Original Sin – in a meritocracy. You fully deserve your wealth if you sweated for it for long, hard years. You don’t deserve a cent if it was simply handed to you. Inheritance of wealth and property is the single issue that goes to the heart of humanity’s future. We cannot have a new world until all private

wealth and property is returned to its original owners – the People, the Commonwealth. To end inheritance is to end the rule of private elites operating solely in their own interest and against the public good and General Will. We can have a world run fairly and rationally in the interests of all, or a world run unfairly to keep the rich rich and everyone else poor. What’s it to be? Human nature has proved one thing beyond any question ... if you give people power, they will do everything to keep it, and become absolutely evil in the process. As Lord Acton said, “Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely.” So, how do you stop corruption? It’s easy. You build into the Constitution the rational, just laws that specifically prevent all of the well-known ways in which the powerful have sought to preserve their power – inheritance above all. The Meritocratic Constitution is one that enshrines equal opportunities for all – and an equal chance for everyone to rise to power if they have the talent, and to be removed from power if they abuse it. It’s not quantum mechanics, is it?! What do the Randian anarcho-capitalist libertarians want? – to create a hereditary rich elite of the family and cronies of “John Galt”, unregulated by any laws, regulations or governments. These American extreme right wingers are despicable enemies of the people who should be shunned and reviled by all decent folk. The problem of the rich has been looking for its Final Solution since the dawn of “private property” (individuals laying claim to pieces of the Earth in perpetuity). Now it’s here – MERITOCRACY, equal opportunities for all, with the most talented, as judged by their peers, rising to the top. This is the sacred cause that will give humanity an enlightened Star Trek future. What’s for sure is that no “invisible hand” of the rich and their supra-political market will ever take us to the stars – only to hell itself. Isn’t it telling about the psyche of America that twice as many students are studying MBAs than the combined total of those taking engineering at undergraduate and postgraduate levels, and more than twice as many graduates do MBAs as science doctorates? And those not doing MBAs are training to be lawyers! Will MBAs and lawyers build starships? Will they cure cancer? Will they solve the ultimate problems of existence? You must be joking. All these people are good for is counting how much money

they’ve stolen from the people and drawing up legal contracts to proclaim that theft when done by them is perfectly legal.

The Bling Ring “Like some sort of unauthorised MTV Cribs, Sofia Coppola’s deadpan comedy breaks us into the homes of LA’s rich and famous – Paris Hilton, Rachel Bilson, Orlando Bloom, Megan Fox and Lindsay Lohan – in the company of the titular gang of vapid, celebrity-obsessed teenaged burglars and thrill-seekers. It is based on a real case, and celeb-literate viewers will be able to date it by the references to Demi and Ashton’s Oscars party, and Lindsay Lohan’s DUI convictions. But it is suffused with the same gauzy, dreamlike quality that is characteristic of all the director’s work. “Here, she uses it to conjure the peculiar, consequence-free atmosphere in which these rich kids live, locked into a narcissistic gaze with their own Facebook pages; hypnotised by celebrity, and their sense of their own entitlement. In the film’s funniest detail, the character Emma Watson plays is home-schooled by her mother (Leslie Mann), with a curriculum drawn entirely from the 2006 self-help book The Secret. In the film’s second funniest detail, Paris Hilton’s mansion (and she opened up the real thing to the film-makers) is decorated with mirrors and framed magazine covers adorned by her own face.” – Laurence Phelan, The Independent

America: The Decline and Fall “... America’s ... increasingly plutocratic internal character.” – Edward Luce “The same banks whose reckless and predatory activities created the financial crisis have shaped the legislation that is supposed to prevent similar crises in future.” – John Gray Social mobility in America has collapsed. The public education system is failing catastrophically. America has spent ruinous amounts of money on two pointless wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that did not serve America’s strategic aims one iota. America has the least cost-effective system of medical care of any advanced country, with capitalist insurance companies determining who gets treated and who doesn’t, who gets to be healthy and who has to remain sick, even who lives and who dies. Rich American insurers constitute a Death Panel, with the power over life and death itself. America, with its failed war on drugs, has a higher proportion of citizens in

jail than anywhere else on Earth. American politics is completely gridlocked and ineffective. The American Constitution, which needs to be rewritten to accommodate life in the 21st century, has the status of holy writ and cannot be challenged. America is full of religious and economic nutcases, and countless conspiracy theorists who imagine their government is out to murder them. Is that a recipe for a successful future? What has failed in America is nothing other than reason itself. Greed has destroyed America. MBAs, lawyers, insurers, bankers and traders are never going to save it. If America doesn’t do the unthinkable – turn to its intelligentsia and meritocratic citizens – it’s finished as a world power.

False Consciousness “False consciousness is the Marxist thesis that material and institutional processes in capitalist society are misleading to the proletariat, and to other classes. These processes conceal the true relations of forces between those classes, and the real state of affairs regarding the development of presocialist society. In Marxist theory, false consciousness is essentially a result of ideological control which the proletariat either do not know they are under or which they disregard with a view to their own POUM (probability/possibility of upward mobility). POUM or something like it is required in economics with its presumption of rational agency; otherwise wage labourers would be the conscious supporters of social relations antithetical to their own interests, violating that presumption.” – Wikipedia The task of the super rich has always been the same: to dupe the masses into believing that the rich are entitled to their extreme wealth and power, deserve to rule over us and pass on their wealth and power to their children, who will then rule over us too. As Marx said, they have created a false consciousness in us in which we are made to believe things that are actively harmful to our interests. For this purpose, they make relentless use of media propaganda and mainstream religion (to claim that they rule by “divine right and grace”, and that wealth is the mark of the Godly). Isn’t it time for true consciousness? Wake up. The worst enemy you have are the super rich. That’s the most basic fact of all. If you haven’t grasped that, you yourself are a victim of false consciousness.

The T-shirt War

Nothing is more important than victory in the “war of signs”. Here’s what one contributor suggested to us: Wouldn’t this make a great t-shirt? Billionaires Suck Ass (on one side) and Meritocracy (on the other). Wouldn’t that be awesome?! or I am an Illuminatus (on one side) and Yes, I Know Everything so Stop Staring at Me, you Freak! (on the other). Imagine a white t-shirt that says in big black letters, Relax: Jesus is a Con Artist/Join the Movement in Relax: Frankie Goes to Hollywood style.

T-Shirts for the Revolution Wouldn’t that be awesome to see a stadium of people all wearing the same Billionaires Suck Ass t-shirts! We could put the Goldman Sachs logo or CEO face with fangs and a donkey ass. What a photo. I can’t wait! “This is the End of History: Goldman Sachs is Dead.” or “It’s the End of the World As We Know it ...Free Your Mind and the Rest will Follow!” or I. (I) R. (Really) S. (Suck) Then we put the CEO of Goldman Sachs on it! We could really rattle them if we made “Tick, Tock” T-shirts with Meritocracy on the back... or Jesus Christ “Superstar”. Who The Fuck Do You think You Are? We could start a Facebook page and get “likes” for our t-shirts and vote on slogans.

Meritocracy Won!

***** Let’s start the great war of the signs!

Anarchy Meritocracy? What happens when an irrationalist tries to grasp a concept such as meritocracy? They immediately pervert it and turn it into something absurd. For instance, someone has advocated “anarchy meritocracy”. Well, meritocracy means “rule by the most meritorious” while anarchy means “absence of government and rulers; a state of disorder due to absence or nonrecognition of authority; absence of government and absolute freedom of the individual, regarded as a political ideal; lack of a leader, the state of people without a government or ruler; rulerless.” So, it’s a category error to link anarchy and meritocracy. In an anarchy, the idea of merit is absurd since it would constitute a form of authority and natural leadership, hence be unacceptable. Moreover, how could merit be established in a system in which there are no rules and no standards because everyone wants unrestrained freedom and refuses to have anyone subject them to any competitive criteria? Meritocracy is quintessentially competitive. The whole point is to give everyone an equal opportunity to shine and then to ensure that those who shine the brightest lead the world – since they are the best qualified to advance the interests of the whole human race. The idea of a meritocracy that despises competition and promotes “unconditional love” is a contradiction in terms. Meritocracy isn’t communism, anarchism, libertarianism or New Ageism. Meritocracy is pro-State, pro-Government, pro positive liberty, pro competition, pro dialectical development, proceeding by way of thesis, antithesis and synthesis. Meritocracy is about legitimate, rational rule by the people best suited and qualified to lead the world forward. It’s not about love, peace, nostalgia, sentimentality, political correctness and everyone being nice to each other and glossing over everything awkward and ugly. It’s not about “group hugging”. Meritocracy is about reason, facts, evidence and proof. Meritocracy is tough and demanding. It doesn’t leave any hiding places for anyone. Meritocracy is about glorious achievements and accomplishments that dazzle the world.

Meritocracy is about getting the most from everyone on Earth, and despising any slackers and parasites who want to live off the efforts of others. Don’t have the impudence to call yourself a meritocrat if you’re committed to some anti-government, anti-State libertarian anarchy controlled by irrational markets or sentimental feelings of “unconditional love”. You know nothing about the human condition if you believe that all human beings are fundamentally nice and that if government and institutions were abolished everything would be fine. Without the State, anarchy would, within hours, descend into the law of the jungle, where the most violent psychopaths would seize control with extreme force and enslave everyone else. Who’s going to stop them? You? Anarchy and libertarianism are the opposite of meritocracy. Plato’s Republic remains the basic blueprint for what meritocracy means – rule by rational philosopher geniuses who are committed to the public good and are prevented by law from enriching themselves. Capitalist plutocracy, on the other hand, is about a private elite enriching themselves, with wealth somehow meant to “trickle down” to everyone else. These days, even the trickle, such as it was, has dried up. Wealth actually keeps travelling up, defying gravity – the rich keep getting richer! Meritocracy is the political expression of rationalism, Plato’s Republic, Rousseau’s Social Contract and the Hegelian dialectic. It’s the General Will in operation. It has nothing to do with hatred of the very principle of government and the State. On the contrary, it’s the optimized expression of government and the State. Contemporary governments are disastrous because they consist of stupid, greedy, self-serving elites whose self-defined mandate is to promote privilege, nepotism and cronyism and enrich themselves at every opportunity. Government is not the problem; the type of person who currently gets into government is the problem, and we can “thank” democracy for that. Not one of these corrupt, inept mainstream politicians would be allowed a role in a meritocratic government. Right wing anarchists (Ayn Rand’s anarcho-capitalist libertarians) believe in the end of government and the State and the permanent rule of the rich via the “free” market. For right wingers, how wealthy you are is a direct measure of your merit (meaning that no genius in human history has ever had any merit in this view since none of them ever belonged to the rich list and most of them despised money). Left wing anarchists don’t even get

as far as having any proposals as to how to proceed. They blabber on about love and light and peace, as if they’ve never once looked out of their window and seen what human beings are actually like. When Christians preached “love”, they got eaten by lions. It was the Christianity of Helena, the mother of the Roman Emperor Constantine, the most powerful man in the world, that proved decisive, i.e. Christianity took the route of worldly power in order to become successful! Left wing anarchists are amongst the most embarrassing and naive people in the world. They would be devoured by wolves in seconds if they ever managed to come to power (of course, it’s impossible that these hippies, tree-huggers, crusties and New Agers could ever organize anything resembling a coherent political movement). Survival is not compulsory. This is a tough, harsh, competitive world. There’s no room for sentimentality, self-delusion and denial. An appeal to weakness (meaning “unconditional love”) will never topple the strong. To beat the strong, you have to be even stronger. That’s the supreme fact of life. Whether you like it or not is simply irrelevant. The universe couldn’t care less about your feelings.

Merit rather than Privilege The dead have no right to control the living through inheritance (by which the inheritors are provided with overwhelming competitive advantage that they did nothing to earn, and which blocks the rise of the authentically most meritorious).

The Movement Rebooted The Movement has a very simple aim ... to reboot the world. Let’s start again, and let’s get it right this time. All of the old systems of control and privilege must be swept away. The rich have had their day. The elites have no interest in public service, only in self-service. They have served themselves long enough. Generational fairness, equal opportunities and anti-privilege must be enshrined in the Constitution itself. It’s time to start again. It’s time to reset the operating system, to wipe out all the junk that has accumulated in the world memory. It’s time to reboot the World.

The Reboot Join the Movement ... and begin the journey of a lifetime. Strictly for activists only. Anything not connected with activism gets ignored. The Movement Rebooted is intended to grow organically, dialectically and meritocratically. It will start off simply, doing basic things, and become more sophisticated as time goes on. People from every background and every part of the world are welcome – providing they can make a meritocratic contribution. Current and recent students are particularly welcome. If the students of the world aren’t motivated to shape the world rationally and on the basis of merit, education and hard work then the world has no future. It will never be free of its controllers. The rich have never shown the slightest compunction about trampling over everyone else to get what they want. What are you going to do about it? No one’s coming to save you. If you don’t get rid of the rich, you will be second class citizens, living in their shadow, forever. For you to flourish, the rich must cease to flourish. Everything they do is for their benefit, not yours. They have no interest in your success, only in your failure. As Gore Vidal said, “It is not enough to succeed. Others must fail.” For the rich to keep succeeding, it’s essential that no one ever challenges their power. For them to maintain a competitive advantage, they need to ensure that you are competitively disadvantaged. They deliberately destroy your potential so that they can maximize theirs. Are you going to let them get away with it? If you don’t stand up for yourself, who else will? What are you waiting for? Permission? Take control of your own life!!! Get Real. Get Active. Get Going. **************

Why the Working Class Are Superior to the Elite The working class have to climb mountains to get to the top. The elite are already there, or only have to cross flat plains. The working class have become battle hardened, have overcome the toughest obstacles, have

defeated all of the resistances in their path. They have made themselves heroes. It’s only a question of time before they crush the weak, degenerate elite.

Justice What is “justice”? It’s the “right way of doing things”. What is the right way of doing things? It’s the rational way, the way that reflects the General Will and is equally fair to everyone.

Religious Bromance Most Christian religious ceremonies involve singing, and loud protestations of love for God. It would be inconceivable for a mathematics, science or philosophy lecture to involve happy clappy outbursts. This shows this difference between something based on feelings and something on thinking. Christian religious ceremonies are a kind of serenading of “God”. On the part of women, they are outright romantic overtures, and on the part of men they are bromances (sublimated homosexuality). Christianity has nothing to do with reason and is all about “love and light”, about a projection of intense feelings onto some imaginary friend and lover. You can’t use reason to destroy Christianity since Christians aren’t rational. All you can do is try to find a better and healthier way for them to release their pent-up emotions. In Nazi Germany, these feelings were redirected to Hitler. In the modern world, many such feelings are transferred to celebrities. We need some new, transcendent Mythos to which all religious feeling can undergo transference.

Crazy Religion “If one person has an imaginary friend, he’s crazy. If many people have the same imaginary friend, it’s Religion.” – Internet Quote “When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called Religion.” – Robert M. Pirsig

The Passover Murderer “And I will pass through the land of Egypt that night, and will kill every firstborn in the land of Egypt both man and beast: against all of the gods of Egypt I will execute judgments. I am the Lord. “And the blood shall be unto you for a sign in the houses where you shall be: and I shall see the blood, and shall pass over you, and the plague shall not be upon you to destroy you, when I shall strike the land of Egypt.” – Jehovah (Exodus 12:11-12) Here we see the Jewish religion of mass murder, psychopathy and pure evil fully and unambiguously revealed. No decent, moral human being could ever read this passage without realising he’s in the presence of the Devil, and that all Jews, Christians and Muslims are out-and-out Satanists. Here are the main points of this demonic statement: 1) “God” himself carried out the mass murder of the Egyptian firstborn, including babies and even animals. What kind of “God” murders innocent children and animals that have done no harm to anyone? This is the wickedest, most immoral monster you could ever imagine. He is an Exterminator. The Nazis simply followed his example. Just as the Jewish God slaughters Egyptian men, women, children, babies and even animals without any consideration of their innocence, goodness, morality or virtue, so the Nazis killed all Jews without discrimination. The Nazis learned the Jewish lesson to the letter and turned it on its originators. Who can weep for the Jews? Did they weep for the firstborn of Egypt? 2) This passage “proves” that that the Jewish God intervenes with deadly force in the affairs of the Jews to save them from their enemies. Merely the “crime” of not being Jewish is enough to get the Egyptian firstborn killed. So why did this violent, deadly God not save the Jews in the Holocaust? Plainly (assuming we accept the account in Exodus), he had the power to stop it. The fact that he didn’t means that he approved of the Holocaust. He himself was a Nazi! The Nazis were his agents, punishing the Jews whom even their own God had disowned and despised. 3) If “God” is all-knowing, how come he didn’t know who the Jews were and required them to mark their doors with sacrificial blood? Plainly, the Jewish God can’t even distinguish his own Chosen People from the pagan

Egyptians, and requires a physical mark to know who’s who. Thus we know that he can’t see people’s souls, so what kind of God is he? 4) “God” is supposed to be the only God, yet he explicitly refers to “all of the gods of Egypt” and promises to “execute judgment” against them. But that’s impossible if they don’t exist. What we see here, with no ambiguity, is that Judaism was originally a polytheistic religion and that Yahweh was one god amongst many. Specifically, he was the Jewish War God, and so his sole task was to aid the Jews in war and help to kill their enemies. That’s the only sense in which his “morality” can be understood. His only function is to serve Jewish military interests. Hence he is the sworn enemy of all non-Jews. 5) If God is an immaterial being in heaven who can create a universe just by the exercise of his mind, why can’t he kill all of the Egyptian firstborn simply by willing it? Why does he need to physically fly over Egypt and kill every firstborn physically? Indeed, how can an immaterial God operate physically in our world, and why would he want to? 6) If God can incarnate physically whenever he likes, what’s the point of Christianity? Why didn’t “God” simply incarnate himself without impregnating a virgin? Why didn’t he come down to the world and sort everything out, just as he sorted out the Egyptians to allow the Jews to go free? This seems to be the most inconsistent and irrational God conceivable. Who could possibly believe in such a God? 7) If all of the Egyptian firstborn really died, it would be infamous in Egyptian history, the most traumatic event in their history bar none, about which the whole nation would have wailed and written countless documents and put up countless memorials (just as the Jews did following the Holocaust). This was the Egyptian Holocaust! Yet there’s not a single mention of it in Egyptian history, not one! One would have to conclude that the Jewish story is a total lie. The Exodus, as described by the Jews, simply never happened. What actually happened was that Egyptians drove them out because they had become too numerous, dangerous and difficult to control – and they were sent out into the desert to die. 8) If Egypt really did suffer ten plagues, culminating with all the firstborn perishing, it would be self-evident that the Jewish God had decisively defeated the Egyptian gods, so it would be perverse and unbelievable that

the Egyptians didn’t convert to Judaism right away and worship the Jewish God. If the ten plagues happened today, who in their right mind wouldn’t become a Jew – out of pure terror, if nothing else? So, in just one tiny passage from the Jewish Bible we find a tale of evil, mass murder of innocents, and a spectacular tissue of lies and nonsense that has no rational content whatsoever. You could choose any passage from the Bible and likewise demolish it. How can any sane, rational person be an Abrahamist? It defies all logic. We challenge any Abrahamist to defend the Jewish God on the basis of the passage we have just deconstructed. If you can’t refute all of the points we have raised, you must stop being an Abrahamist! It’s as simple as that.

The Angel of Death? “This is what the LORD says: ‘About midnight I will go throughout Egypt. Every firstborn in Egypt will die, from the firstborn son of Pharaoh, who sits on the throne, to the firstborn of the slave girl, who is at her hand mill, and all the firstborn of the cattle as well. There will be loud wailing throughout Egypt – worse than there has ever been or ever will be again.’” – Exodus 11:4–6 Many Abrahamists claim that the “Angel of Death” did Jehovah’s dirty work and murdered the Egyptian firstborn on his behalf, but it’s clear from the text that Jehovah himself was the mass murderer: “For the Lord will pass through to smite the Egyptians; and when he seeth the blood upon the lintel, and on the two side posts, the Lord will pass over the door, and will not suffer the destroyer to come in unto your houses to smite you.” – Exodus 12:23 The Angel of Death theory comes from the reference to the “destroyer” that comes into people’s houses. However, this is a mistranslation. The true sentence should read: “...and he will not permit the destroying [the destruction] to enter your houses and strike you down.” It suits the Abrahamists to portray “God” as a loving, peaceful, forgiving deity. In fact, he himself is an exterminator, a blood-soaked “God” of the most abominable and horrific kind. Like a Nazi, he commits atrocities and reprisals against the wholly innocent, just because they are associated with the people he wants to punish. Such is his psychopathy that he even

slaughters animals! Really, what kind of human being, other than a Devil worshipper, would revere this monster? All Jews, Christians and Muslims are the damned. They have wilfully and malevolently chosen to worship Satan rather than the True God. Hell mend them!

The Divine Terrorist “According to the Torah, God hardened Pharaoh’s heart so he would be strong enough to persist in his unwillingness to release the people, so that God could manifest his great power and cause it to be declared among the nations, so that other people would discuss it for generations afterward. In this view, the plagues were punishment for the Egyptians’ long abuse of the Israelites, as well as proof that the gods of Egypt were powerless by comparison. If God triumphed over the gods of Egypt, a world power at that time, then the people of God would be strengthened in their faith, although they were a small people, and would not be tempted to follow the deities that God put to shame.” – Wikipedia “I could have stretched forth My hand and stricken you [Pharaoh] and your people with pestilence, and you would have been effaced from the earth. Nevertheless I have spared you for this purpose: in order to show you My power and in order that My fame may resound throughout the world.” – Exodus 9:15–16 Here we see that Yahweh is a blatant terrorist, engaging in “shock and awe” tactics. He “spares” the Egyptians purely in order to terrorise them and make them fear his power. He wants his “fame” to “resound throughout the world.” Isn’t it incredible that the Creator of the Universe has to communicate his “fame” via mass terrorism, via an ancient version of 9/11? You would think “God” could make himself known to all any time he likes simply by appearing to us all and communicating with us all, but apparently he prefers to communicate via horrific atrocities that he wants people to talk about for the rest of time. All Abrahamists are worshippers of a cosmic terrorist! If the Egyptian gods were “powerless” in relation to the Jewish God, why did the Egyptians go on believing in them? Plainly, the Egyptians had no notion at all that their gods were defeated by anyone. What we really have here is a simple propaganda exercise, where, as usual, the first casualty is the truth. This tale was designed to prove to the

Jews that although they were an insignificant people in comparison with the world power of Egypt, nevertheless they outgunned the Egyptians because they had the Creator of the universe on their side. Yet, if there were a Creator, he clearly wouldn’t be on the side of anyone, least of all a primitive tribe in the Middle East. The Jews are the maddest people in history because they simply ignored reality, the facts on the ground, all possible rational evidence, and believed in a fantasy where they were much more powerful than their much more impressive enemies. All the facts show that the absolute opposite of what the Jews believe is the case. The Jewish God was humiliated and vanquished by: the Egyptians, Assyrians, Babylonians, Greeks, Romans, Europeans and Nazis. He’s the biggest serial loser in history. Yet the Jews go on believing. Why? Because they’re insane. And now we see exactly the same thing with the Muslims. Islam has been vanquished and humiliated in every possible way by the infidel West, yet the faith of the Muslims just gets stronger rather than weaker. It’s cognitive dissonance at its craziest. Rather than abandon their belief in their disproven religions, the Abrahamists become more fanatically and insanely attached to them. They are the absolute enemies of reason and human progress.

***** “I could have stretched forth My hand and stricken you [Pharaoh] and your people with pestilence, and you would have been effaced from the earth.” – Jehovah Why didn’t Jehovah do this to the Nazis (“efface them from the earth”)? How, exactly, do the Jews account for the complete inaction of Jehovah during the Holocaust? Either he could intervene but didn’t, hence he is no friend of the Jews. Or he wanted to intervene but couldn’t, hence he is not God. So, Jews, which is it?

Yom Kippur “Yom Kippur, also known as Day of Atonement, is the holiest day of the year for the Jewish people. Its central themes are atonement and repentance. Jewish people traditionally observe this holy day with an approximate 25hour period of fasting and intensive prayer, often spending most of the day

in synagogue services. ... According to Jewish tradition, God inscribes each person’s fate for the coming year into a book, the Book of Life, on Rosh Hashanah, and waits until Yom Kippur to ‘seal’ the verdict. During the Days of Awe, a Jewish person tries to amend his or her behaviour and seek forgiveness for wrongs done against God and against other human beings. The evening and day of Yom Kippur are set aside for public and private petitions and confessions of guilt. At the end of Yom Kippur, one hopes that they have been forgiven by God.” – Wikipedia Well, the Jews certainly have plenty to atone and repent for. The first thing they must do is atone for believing in their Devil God!

***** “The ten days starting with Rosh Hashanah and ending with Yom Kippur are commonly known as the Days of Awe or the Days of Repentance. This is a time for serious introspection, a time to consider the sins of the previous year and repent before Yom Kippur. “One of the ongoing themes of the Days of Awe is the concept that G-d has ‘books’ that he writes our names in, writing down who will live and who will die, who will have a good life and who will have a bad life, for the next year. These books are written in on Rosh Hashanah, but our actions during the Days of Awe can alter G-d’s decree. The actions that change the decree are ‘teshuvah, tefilah and tzedakah,’ repentance, prayer, good deeds (usually, charity). These ‘books’ are sealed on Yom Kippur. This concept of writing in books is the source of the common greeting during this time is ‘May you be inscribed and sealed for a good year.’ – http://www.jewfaq.org/holiday3.htm Note that “God” is said to write a person’s fate in a book, and then can change his mind in the next ten days. This means that God is not certain of his own mind! He’s capricious and indecisive. Moreover, if someone can change their fate then plainly “God” does not have foreknowledge of their conduct, hence is not God! And why does “God” need to write things in books anyway? Is he having trouble with his memory. Is he going a bit senile? Does he suffer from Alzheimer’s? Maybe that’s why he completely forgot his Covenant with the Jews and did nothing to intervene in the Holocaust. Instead, it was Soviet Communists (atheists) who saved the Jews from the Nazis!

Judaism is an intellectual joke. No intelligent person could ever subscribe to such a silly and indeed demonic religion. When will the Jews become sane and rational and admit to the world that they got it all wrong?!

The Shadow “The Church says that the Earth is flat, but I know that it is round. For I have seen the shadow of the earth on the moon and I have more faith in the Shadow than in the Church.” – attributed to Magellan The “shadows” usually have more truth than the institutions of “truth”.

Success Three types of people succeed: 1) The privileged who have it handed to them on a plate. 2) The exceptionally lucky (and in a world of seven billion people there will be several thousands of such people). 3) The hardest working – those who put in 80-hour weeks, week in and week out, in their own field of interest. So, are you one of the ones who will succeed?

Mythbuster “While many people believe that lemmings commit mass suicide when they migrate, this is not the case. Driven by strong biological urges, they will migrate in large groups when population density becomes too great. Lemmings can and do swim and may choose to cross a body of water in search of a new habitat. On occasion, and particularly in the case of the Norway lemmings in Scandinavia, large migrating groups will reach a cliff overlooking the ocean. They will stop until the urge to press on causes them to jump off the cliff and start swimming, sometimes to exhaustion and death. Lemmings are also often pushed into the sea as more and more lemmings arrive at the shore.” – Wikipedia There are countless popular beliefs that have long since been refuted but the myth persists anyway – because it’s more colourful and interesting than the

truth. It has greater Meme Power. Its mythic qualities are vastly superior. That’s why disproven religions persist while the truth hides in the shadows.

Know Thyself You can’t know who others are until you know who you are. Isn’t it revealing that on Apollo’s Temple was a Logos statement of reason and knowledge, of the highest philosophy and introspection – (“Know Thyself”) – while on Christian churches we are told that “Jesus loves you”, “Jesus died for you”, “Jesus gave his life to save you”, “Jesus is the Word”, “Jesus is love”, “Jesus is the truth and the light” – all pure Mythos. The Apollonian religion wants you know who you are. The Christian religion wants you to know who some ancient Jew called Jesus (or, rather, Yehoshua) was. Who cares who he was?! You are much more important than any dead Jew from 2,000 years ago, any false prophet, any false claimant to being a Messiah. With Apollo, you come first. You are the master of the situation. With Christianity, Jesus comes first. You are his slave. With Apollo, it’s all about reason. With Christianity, it’s all about beliefs, feelings and your relationship with Jesus. Apollo and Christ represent two polar opposite approaches to reality. Make sure you’re on the right side of the argument.

Faith Schools All sectarian, irrationalist, faith-based schools should be closed down by the State. The only acceptable schools are Schools of Apollo, devoted to reason, and over the front gates of which is written, “Know Thyself.”

Parents versus the State All right wingers support the family (parents) against the State. All rational left wingers support the State against the family (parents). So, what are parents? They are two average, bland, banal, nondescript, none-too-bright, religious types who have never had an independent, intelligent, creative thought in their lives. And these are the people to whom we trust our future – the children of the world! Is it any wonder the world is so fucked!? It couldn’t possibly be otherwise.

What about the State? Well, it has access to the smartest people in the country. It can bring together all the geniuses, all the top people in every field. The State can offer excellence, quality, merit and genius while parents can offer only an average IQ and mediocrity. If you think average parents are better suited to bringing up children than the Platonic State devoted to intellectual brilliance, you really are in serious trouble. No wonder you’re dumb. Right wingers are anti-Statist “Protestants” and left wingers are Statist “Catholics”. Protestants claim that ordinary people can save themselves through their faith alone. The Catholic Church says that only through the mediation of the Church and the Holy Sacraments can a person be saved. In terms of society, “Protestants” say that the family (parents) know what is best for their own and their children’s “salvation”, and there’s no need for the State (the “Church”) at all. “Catholics” say that the State (or Church with all of its experts, theologians, scholars, cardinals and popes) knows best and only it has the resources to optimise its citizens. It’s all a question of expertise. Which has better access to genius and excellence – the State or average parents? The odds against your parents knowing better than the State are overwhelming. Are your parents better at science than the scientific establishment? When can parents ever be better than the experts except in the rare cases where they themselves are the experts in question? Why are Muslims so backward? It’s precisely because they believe that parents know best. What was the Enlightenment? It was a movement that involved a critical mass of geniuses all working together to set up a new vision of reality. Geniuses will set us free, not mediocre parents. Negative liberty is the Protestant doctrine that average parents know best and the State should butt out. Positive liberty is the Catholic doctrine that geniuses know best and we will all be better off if we trust in them to guide us forward. So, whose side are you on – average parents or geniuses? Who will lead us to a glorious future – our average parents or humanity’s very finest? It’s not much of question. You’re a lunatic if you think parents are your salvation. That’s what five-year-olds believe. Haven’t you grown up yet? Your dad isn’t God. You may love him but that doesn’t change the fact that he’s a mediocrity and he cannot lead you to the Promised Land.

The Disaster Judaism is the greatest religious error and disaster of all time. If it wasn’t bad enough on its own, it spawned a second version of Judaism, the monstrosity of Christianity, the religion that the Jew Yehoshua ben Yosef was the Jewish Messiah and, in fact, Yahweh himself. Then came a third vile version of Judaism in the shape of Islam, the Arab Judaism of the prophet Mohammed. Abrahamism is nothing but the worship of naked power – of Satan.

Management “So much of what we call management consists in making it difficult for people to work.” – Peter Drucker Management is all about control, about maintaining the power of the hierarchy. It’s not about releasing the creativity and energy of the workers. In fact, it’s designed to stamp that out. Managers have no interest in people who are smarter and more creative than they are. Talent is not required in heavily managed offices, only compliant sheep who never cause trouble. And that’s why all over-managed companies fail.

Ambition “A man’s ambition must be small, to write his name on a toilet wall.” – Internet Quotation What do you write your name on? History, or a toilet wall?

All That Are you “all that”? Or are you not much at all? What influence have you had on the world? Whose fault is that? Be all you can be. Don’t let anyone hold you back.

Disconnected Let’s imagine for a moment that the Jewish Bible truly reflects a period when “God” once interacted with the Jewish people. Let’s imagine that the Jews once had a “hotline” to God and it was the Ark of the Covenant. But the Ark has gone, and the line has been disconnected. When was the last

time anything “Biblical” happened? Was the Holocaust Biblical? Was the Roman destruction of Jerusalem and its temple Biblical? If God promised Israel to the Jews, why were they excluded from it for 2,000 years, and only got it back thanks to the sympathy felt for them following the Holocaust? The fact is that the Jewish phone to God no longer has a dial tone. It went out of service long ago and has been disconnected. The Jews are still on the phone, blabbering away to their God, but no one is listening and no one is replying. They are literally talking to empty space. There is no one on the other end of the Jewish phone. By the same token, the “synchronised prayers” – the Muslims – are all on their knees, bowing and scraping and praying five times a day every day for life, and yet there’s no one there. When was the last time Allah and the Angel Gabriel last interacted with the Muslims? When was the last time Islam was successful? The Christian and secular West has utterly humiliated Islam and is far advanced of it. How can that be if Allah is looking after the interests of the Muslims? He’s plainly not much of a God. What’s the point of praying to someone who never answers? Do the Muslims love the sound of their own voices? All they do is talk to a vacuum. What’s the good of that? It’s a well-known fact that mad people talk to themselves. When hundreds of millions of people talk to themselves and bow to thin air, it’s called religion. When will mainstream religion be labelled for what it is – collective rather than individual insanity? One person who believes nonsense is mad. When hundreds of millions of people believe the same nonsense it becomes “sane”. But it isn’t. It’s still as mad as it ever was. Moses, Jesus and Mohammed were all lunatics who heard voices. They should all have been locked up. Instead, countless people started believing that they could hear the same voices too. Religion is simply “normalised” lunacy, popular and successful craziness, madness that people find rewarding, comforting and lifeenhancing. Human history has, unfortunately, been shaped by charismatic madmen who made others accept their madness as sanity. Indeed, as the highest sanity of all ... the absolute truth of existence. On the contrary, mainstream religion is the absolute falsification of reality. Abrahamism is as far from the truth as you can possibly get. It has zero truth content.

Government Anarchists say that government is the central problem of the world, so the solution is to abolish government. In fact, the problem with the world is bad government and the solution is good government. The jungle is what the world is like without government. Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, father of anarchism, argued that “Anarchy is Order Without Power”. Actually, order is power and without power there can be no order. Anarchy is therefore simply disorder in which the most primitive and least stable form of power – brute violence – reigns supreme, exactly as in the jungle. Anarchy is the opposite of civilisation and society. Anarchy is ultimately about rule by the most violent and psychopathic since there are no laws and no powers of enforcement to stop them because these have all been abolished by the anarchists.

Pierre-Joseph Proudhon “Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (15 January 1809 – 19 January 1865) was a French politician, founder of Mutualist philosophy, economist, and libertarian socialist. He is the first person to call himself an ‘anarchist’, and considered among its most influential theorists. He is considered by many to be the ‘father of anarchism’. He became a member of the French Parliament after the revolution of 1848, whereon he referred to himself as a ‘federalist’. “Proudhon, who was born in Besançon, was a printer who taught himself Latin in order to better print books in the language. His best-known assertion is that Property is Theft! contained in his first major work, What is Property? Or, an Inquiry into the Principle of Right and Government, published in 1840. The book’s publication attracted the attention of the French authorities. It also attracted the scrutiny of Karl Marx, who started a correspondence with its author. The two influenced each other: they met in Paris while Marx was exiled there. Their friendship finally ended when Marx responded to Proudhon’s The System of Economic Contradictions, or The Philosophy of Poverty with the provocatively titled The Poverty of Philosophy. The dispute became one of the sources of the split between the anarchist and Marxian wings of the International Working Men’s Association. ...

“Proudhon favoured workers’ associations or co-operatives, as well as individual worker/peasant possession, over private ownership or the nationalization of land and workplaces. He considered social revolution to be achievable in a peaceful manner. In The Confessions of a Revolutionary Proudhon asserted that, Anarchy is Order Without Power, the phrase which much later inspired, in the view of some, the anarchist circled-A symbol, today ‘one of the most common graffiti on the urban landscape.’ He unsuccessfully tried to create a national bank, to be funded by what became an abortive attempt at an income tax on capitalists and shareholders. Similar in some respects to a credit union, it would have given interest-free loans.” – Wikipedia “To be governed is to be watched, inspected, spied upon, directed, legislated at, numbered, regulated, enrolled, indoctrinated, preached at, controlled, checked, assessed, estimated, valued, weighed, censored, commanded, by men who have neither the right, nor the knowledge, nor the virtue. ... To be governed is to be at every operation, at every transaction, noted, registered, enrolled, taxed, stamped, measured, numbered, assessed, licensed, authorized, admonished, forbidden, reformed, corrected, punished. It is, under the pretext of public utility, and in the name of the general interest, to be placed under contribution, trained, ransomed, exploited, monopolized, extorted, squeezed, mystified, robbed; then, at the slightest resistance, the first word of complaint, to be repressed, fined, despised, harassed, tracked, abused, clubbed, disarmed, choked, imprisoned, judged, condemned, shot, deported, sacrificed, sold, betrayed; and, to crown all, mocked, ridiculed, outraged, dishonoured. That is government; that is its justice; that is its morality.” – Pierre-Joseph Proudhon “The great are only great because we are on our knees. Let us rise!” – Pierre-Joseph Proudhon “A common danger tends to concord. Communism is the exploitation of the strong by the weak. In Communism, inequality comes from placing mediocrity on a level with excellence.” – Pierre-Joseph Proudhon “All parties without exception, when they seek for power, are varieties of absolutism.” – Pierre-Joseph Proudhon “The possessions of the rich are stolen property. ... Property is theft.” – Pierre-Joseph Proudhon

“Communism is inequality, but not as property is. Property is exploitation of the weak by the strong. Communism is exploitation of the strong by the weak.” – Pierre-Joseph Proudhon Pierre-Joseph Proudhon was not only the first person to call himself an “anarchist,” but also the first to use “capitalist” to mean property-owner. Proudhon actually had many excellent ideas, but they would be all be improved, and have a chance of being implemented, in a framework of meritocracy, social capitalism, 100% inheritance tax and the Commonwealth rather than the dead end of anarchism.

The Propaganda of the Deed “When deeds speak, words are nothing.” – Pierre-Joseph Proudhon “Propaganda of the deed (or propaganda by the deed, from the French propaganda par le fait) is specific political action meant to be exemplary to others. ... One of the first individuals to conceptualise propaganda by the deed was the Italian revolutionary Carlo Pisacane (1818–57), who wrote in his ‘Political Testament’ (1857) that ‘ideas spring from deeds and not the other way around.’ Mikhail Bakunin (1814–1876), in his ‘Letters to a Frenchman on the Present Crisis’ (1870) stated that ‘we must spread our principles, not with words but with deeds, for this is the most popular, the most potent, and the most irresistible form of propaganda.’” – Wikipedia Actions speak louder than words.

Innocence? “There are no innocent bourgeois.” – Émile Henry (anarchist)

The Nihilist Movement “The Nihilist movement was a Russian movement in the 1860s which rejected all authorities. It is derived from the Latin nihil, meaning ‘nothing’. After the assassination of Tsar Alexander II in 1881, the Nihilists were known throughout Europe as proponents of the use of violence in order to bring about political change. “The Nihilists were angered by what they described as the abusive nature of the Eastern Orthodox Church and the tsarist monarchy, and by the

domination of the economy by the aristocracy. Although the term Nihilist was first used by the German theologian Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi, its widespread usage began with the 1862 novel Fathers and Sons by the Russian author Ivan Turgenev. The main character of the novel, Eugene Bazarov, who describes himself as a Nihilist, wants to educate the people. This ‘go to the people – be the people’ campaign reached its height in the 1870s, during which underground groups such as Circle of Tchaikovsky, People’s Will and Land and Liberty were formed. This became known as the Narodnik movement, whose members believed that the newly freed serfs were merely being sold into wage slavery in the onset of the Industrial Revolution, and that the middle and upper classes had effectively replaced landowners. The Russian state attempted to suppress them. In actions described by the Nihilists as propaganda of the deed many government officials were assassinated. In 1881 Alexander II was killed on the very day he had approved a proposal to call a representative assembly to consider new reforms.” – Wikipedia Nihilism, like left-wing anarchism, is good at denouncing the wickedness of the elite, but useless at proposing any realistic alternative. Anarchism, nihilism and libertarianism are all more or less the same thing. They despise authority, law and order. They believe that the individual, not the community, is the supreme good. They reject the General Will in favour of the particular will. They support the Freudian Id (“Me, me, me”) over the Freudian Superego (“We, we, we”). They are the enemies of the people since they oppose the people and believe that they should be allowed to do whatever they like, regardless of others. They are selfish, self-interested, self-obsessed, narcissistic egoists with an enormous sense of self-entitlement. Such people are now making America ungovernable. The Unabomber is the perfect example of anarchism, nihilism and libertarianism – a homicidal lunatic. The Unabomber is the Ur conspiracy theorist and hater of everything to do with the government and State.

Good and Bad Religion is based on “good” (people of faith) versus “evil” (infidels). Elitism is based on “good” (rare and exceptional) versus “bad” (common and average).

Capitalism is based on rich (the ownership class) versus poor (the owned class). Politics is based on “us” (“our supporters”) and “them” (“our opponents”). What about Illuminism? Illuminism concerns the smart (illuminated) versus stupid (endarkened). Illuminism is the religion, politics, economics, science, sociology and psychology of ontological mathematics, the one and only answer to everything. Forget the rest. Get Illuminated. Join the Revolution of Truth, of mathematical hyperrationalism.

The Obstacle There are those who make a difference in the world, and there’s everyone else – the mob, the herd, the masses, the background, the bystanders, the spectators. Which are you? Own your own life. Don’t let someone else own it. Only one person can ever truly hold you back – yourself! Don’t be your own worst enemy.

Belief The Jews believe they are the Chosen People. This belief does not make it true. However, they all act as if it were true. The world of belief is a wholly false world where lies and delusions are treated as objective truths and facts. One and a half billion Muslims believe as utterly true a book (the Koran) that is in fact utterly false. What a world! Humanity’s lack of a relationship with the truth is its greatest problem and tragedy. As Nietzsche observed, human beings have no organ of truth.

Homeland The hit American TV series Homeland is a modern reworking of the tale of Cassandra. Cassandra was the daughter of Priam, the King of Troy. Apollo conferred the gift of prophecy on her but when she refused to yield to his sexual advances, he altered the details of his gift. Cassandra was fated to always tell the truth, but never be believed. A “Cassandra” is any wise person with an accurate view of future events who is totally ignored, especially by those who most need to listen.

In Homeland, Carrie (she might as well be called Cassie!) warns everyone that homecoming war hero Sergeant Brody is a Muslim terrorist, but no one listens. She’s proved right, but only at tremendous cost to herself. Ironically, she is later a defender of Brody and insists that he didn’t perform a terrible terrorist atrocity when everyone else is certain he did. To be always right but never be believed would drive anyone mad.

***** Apollo, like all Gods, could never withdraw anything he had ordained. It’s one of the staggering features of Abrahamism that “God” ordained the death of Isaac at Abraham’s hands – then prevented it. No God would ever change an order. It’s simply unthinkable. It means that God is unreliable, unpredictable, that he cannot be trusted. It means he changes his mind and that his orders can be challenged. Quite simply, the Abraham incident proves conclusively that the Abrahamic God is a false God. A God whose word is not his bond is no God. A God who gives false orders is no God. A God who gives any immoral order is no God. A God whose statements are not guaranteed to be true is the Father of Lies – Satan.

The Ultimate Fantasy The idea of Jesus Christ having been married, having children and establishing a royal bloodline that exists up to the present day is tremendously appealing to many people. It’s their religious wet dream to have gods and kings combined in one dynastic family. Yet their logic has fallen apart. If Jesus Christ was a man who had children and didn’t die on the Cross and wasn’t resurrected then Christianity as a religion is over. In Islam, Shia Muslims play a similar game. They have always dreamt of being ruled over by the direct descendants of Mohammed. They want their prophet and their rulers to be combined in one bloodline. Kings claimed to rule by dive right. If they were in fact divine, or had hold blood flowing through them, that would be the ultimate legitimacy. But why are people so eager to be ruled? Illuminism is about overthrowing kings and even gods. The only gods we look to are ourselves! We can all become gods, and we need no king or God to rule us.

Equality

An internet picture shows, on its left, a vast Brazilian slum (with no greenery), a high wall in the middle and then, on its right, a glittering tower for the rich elite, surrounded by greenery. The picture is intended to show the grotesque disparity in wealth between rich and poor. However, a capitalist libertarian wrote, “In socialism, the left side of the picture is on the right too”, meaning that everyone is poor. This person believes that it’s inherently better for a few people to be stinking rich and for everyone else to be grotesquely poor than for everyone to be simply poor. In fact, a world of equality in poverty would almost certainly be enormously happier than one of gargantuan inequality. The question always remains this – why do the poor multitudes tolerate the presence of a tiny greedy, hawkish elite in their midst, lording it over them? That is the central mystery of the human condition and the basis of the master-slave dialectic.

“The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West” – by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy in the Reagan Administration and highly influential in the development of Reaganomics. He was also an associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. A former libertarian, Roberts has now recognised the error of his ways. He says that the direct result of deregulation is crony capitalism – precisely the thing about which libertarians complain – and not the free-market capitalist utopia of which the libertarians dream. Roberts acknowledges that deregulation was a disaster and is astounded that there are still those (libertarians) calling for even more deregulation. Roberts argues that markets were imagined by libertarians to be self-regulating, but proved anything but. The whole of anarcho-capitalist libertarianism is predicated on the fallacy that markets are efficient and orderly. In fact, they are simply the vehicles for rule by the dominant market players who control and rig the market. “The one percent have pulled off an economic and political revolution. By offshoring manufacturing and professional service jobs, US corporations

destroyed the growth of consumer income, the basis of the US economy, leaving the bulk of the population mired in debt. Deregulation was used to concentrate income and wealth in fewer hands and financial firms in corporations ‘too big to fail,’ removing financial corporations from market discipline and forcing taxpayers in the US and Europe to cover bankster losses.” – Dr. Paul Craig Roberts “The west prides itself that it is the standard for the world, that it is a democracy. But nowhere do you see democratic outcomes: not in Greece, not in Ireland, not in the UK, not here, the outcomes are always to punish the innocent and reward the guilty. And that’s why the Greeks are in the streets, protesting. We see this all over the West. There is no democracy, there are oligarchies, some of these smaller European countries are not even run by their own governments, they are run by Wall Street... There is probably more democracy in China than there is in the West. Revolution is the only answer... We are confronted with a curious situation. Throughout the West we think we have democracy, we hold ourselves up high, we demonize China, we talk about the mafia state of Russia, we talk about the Arabs and so on, but where is the democracy here?” – Dr. Paul Craig Roberts “Anyone who depends on print, TV, or right-wing talk radio media is totally misinformed. The Bush administration has achieved a ‘de facto’ Ministry of Propaganda.” – Dr. Paul Craig Roberts “The uniformity of the US media has become much more complete since the days of the cold war. During the 1990s, the US government permitted an unconscionable concentration of print and broadcast media that terminated the independence of the media. Today the US media is owned by 5 giant companies in which pro-Zionist Jews have disproportionate influence. More importantly, the values of the conglomerates reside in the broadcast licenses, which are granted by the government, and the corporations are run by corporate executives — not by journalists — whose eyes are on advertising revenues and the avoidance of controversy that might produce boycotts or upset advertisers and subscribers.” – Dr. Paul Craig Roberts “If you remove markets from social control, you allow the rich, powerful interests to take over the government.” – Dr. Paul Craig Roberts

The Angel? An angel reputedly prevented Abraham from murdering Isaac/ Ishmael. So, Mohammed, who believed that Abraham was the first Muslim, would not have been surprised to encounter an angel (Gabriel) in a cave. People’s expectations are extremely important in what they believe. The only people who meet angels in the present day are those who believe in them. People who don’t believe in the supernatural do not have supernatural experiences. Before any Muslims speak on TV, they should be asked, “Do you believe in angels and jinn (genies).” Of course, they are compelled to say yes because the Koran demands it, but as soon as they say yes they lose all credibility. All Abrahamists should be put on the spot regarding their crazy ideas. They should be permanently presented as lunatics and irrationalists desperately clinging onto ancient, mythical beliefs and superstitions. Eventually, they will seem comic and absurd and their religions will no longer be taken seriously by anyone.

The Jews In the Bible, Judah sold his brother Joseph into slavery, a grotesque episode that came to overshadow all of Jewish history. In later Israelite history, after the death of Solomon, a savage civil war broke out causing Israel to split into two: the northern Kingdom of Israel, tracing its roots back to Joseph, and the southern Kingdom of Judah, claiming its descent from Judah. The Israelites began as “Hebrews”, followers of the prophet Abraham. They acquired the name Israelites because they were descended from Jacob, who took the name of “Israel” (meaning “He who struggles With the God El”). The specific word “Jew” (“Yehudi” in Hebrew) is derived from “Judah”, the name of one of Jacob’s twelve sons, and founder of the tribe of Judah, one of the twelve tribes of Israel. The religion “Judaism” means “Judah-ism,” that is, the religion of the tribe of Judah (Yehudim). The Kingdom of Judah comprised the tribes of Judah and Benjamin. (Note that the Tribe of Levi – the priest caste – split in two, some joining the northern and some the southern kingdom). There is monumental secret hidden in what we have just said. The Hebrews and Israelites are not the same as Jews. The Hebrews (Israelites)

were followers of the Canaanite God El, not of the Jewish God Yahweh. A terrible civil war broke out between the rival factions, and a coded reference is made to this period in the strange Biblical tale involving eleven tribes of Israel going to war with the twelfth (the tribe of Benjamin) and almost exterminating it. Incredibly, it was this self-same “heretic” tribe that then supplied Israel’s first king, Saul. In this context, Wikipedia says, “After the death of Saul, all the tribes other than Judah remained loyal to the House of Saul, while Judah chose David as its king. However, after the death of Ish-bosheth, Saul’s son and successor to the throne of Israel, all the other Israelite tribes made David, who was then the king of Judah, king of a re-united Kingdom of Israel. However, on the accession of Rehoboam, Solomon’s son, in c. 930 BC, the northern tribes under the leadership of Jeroboam from the Tribe of Ephraim split from the House of David to reform a Kingdom of Israel as the Northern Kingdom. The tribes of Judah and Benjamin remained loyal to the House of David. These tribes formed the Kingdom of Judah, which existed until Judah was conquered by Babylon in c. 586 BC and the population deported.” So, we find incredibly bitter inter-tribal tensions between the Israelites. The true Israelites are not the Jews. The Jews are not entitled to call themselves Israelites since they do not worship El. The true Israelites were conquered by the Assyrians and vanished from history. Ten Israeli tribes became “lost”. Quite simply, from the earliest days, the Israeli Tribes that looked to Joseph as their patriarch were radically different from the Tribe of Judah that looked to Judah as their patriarch. It’s highly probable that the Tribe of Benjamin decided to switch sides from the Joseph faction to the Judah faction, hence was attacked by the other ten Tribes loyal to Joseph and almost wiped out. The rump of Benjamites took refuge with the Jews and became fully incorporated into the Tribe of Judas, as did the Levi priests who had remained in the southern kingdom of Judah. It’s about time that the Myth of the Jews was fully exposed and the true Israelites revealed as the polytheists and followers of the Canaanite pantheon that they actually were.

Frauds

“All men are frauds. The only difference between them is that some admit it. I myself deny it.” – H L Mencken

Insignificance “Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it.” – Mahatma Gandhi

High Life and Low Life The elite enjoy the high life and the underclass endure the low life. Everyone aspires to the high life and dreads falling into the low life. Those in the high life sometimes slum it in the low life with low lives, for added excitement, sleaze and novelty. The low lives permanently dream of escaping to the high life.

Monotheism versus Multiculturalism Monotheists have always been much more fanatical than polytheists (or Multitheists, as we might say). So, does this imply that Multicultural societies are much more tolerant than Monocultural societies? Arguably, humanity’s two greatest societies were those of ancient Greece and Renaissance Italy. Both were based on the city-state rather than nation-state. However, in the case of the Greeks, they all recognised that they were different from the “barbarians” (non-Greeks), that they all shared the same language, the same Gods and were all willing to ally themselves against the common enemy (Persia). They also took part in great pan-Greek festivals such as the Olympics. Likewise, the Italian city-states all had the same religion (Catholicism), all owed loyalty to the Pope in Rome, all spoke the same language and were involved in ever-changing alliances with each other against common enemies. Ancient Greece and Renaissance Italy were essentially Monocultures with many different variations on the common theme. This is the ideal basis of society. There’s a common identity and yet many different ways of expressing that identity. Now consider a Multicultural society such as modern Britain. Here there are many cultures within the nation and they reflect completely different religions, completely different languages, completely different traditions,

completely different customs and practices, completely different ways of dressing, completely different attitudes to sex, drinking, drugs, entertainment, free speech, democracy, and so on. Many of these cultures explicitly owe their primary loyalty to foreign nations such as Israel, India, Somalia and Pakistan. Whereas the ancient Greeks in their patchwork of city-states all considered themselves Greek, that’s certainly not true in the nation-state of modern Britain where many cultures see themselves as merely living in Britain but not at all British. Britain has no common culture and no common identity. It’s full of ghettos and different groups that despise each other, having zero in common. Often, cultural practices of one group are abominations to other groups, and wholly unacceptable. You cannot have a successful nation if the people are not rowing forward together in the same boat with a common objective. Britain does not have a people but, rather, a population, i.e. people who live in Britain but do not belong to Britain and do not in any way reflect its history. On the contrary, they have imported the history of foreign nations and are thus actively subverting and weakening British identity. Britain is now a joke of nation, utterly enfeebled, and yet the establishment, the elite, continually trumpet the “virtues” of Multiculturalism. Multiculturalism is nothing but a social poison, a deadly toxin that runs through the nation’s blood and makes the nation ill and diseased. A Monoculture with many different variations is fantastic. A Multiculture with many conflicting cultures is a catastrophe. Moreover, these many conflicting cultures frequently reflect fanatically intolerant monotheistic religions. Thus, in Britain, there are extremist Jewish communities that regard themselves as the “Chosen People” and the British goyim as the non-Chosen People, and there are Islamic Fundamentalist communities that want to impose Sharia Law on Britain and the whole world, want to convert everyone to Islam, want everyone to revere and obey the Koran, want all women to wear burqas and all men to have beards, and so on. In other words, the Muslims want to impose a global Monoculture based on Allah, Mohammed and the Koran. How can any sane, rational country tolerate multicultures that actually want to overthrow

Multiculturalism and impose a fanatical monotheistic Monoculture? It’s deranged. Abrahamic monotheistic religions are completely unacceptable in tolerant societies, and a direct contradiction of the values of such societies. They must be abolished and eradicated. Monoculturalism (based on polytheism) is good; Multiculturalism (based on rival expressions of monotheism) is evil and insane. Britain is a mad country because it’s full of Christians, Jews, Muslims, Sikhs, Hindus, atheists, agnostics, secularists, and so on. There is no way in which Britain can have a common identity and purpose, hence Britain can never succeed. With its endorsement of Multiculturalism, Britain has signed its own death warrant. The British elites that support Multiculturalism are the worst traitors Britain has ever had. For Britain to advance, all extremist religions – especially Islam – must be driven out. Muslims owe their loyalty to Allah, Mohammed and the Koran, not to Britain or any other nation. No nation can succeed when it gives shelter and support to groups that actually want to overthrow the State and change it to something completely different, reflecting a wholly different culture. No nation should ever tolerate monotheism. Abrahamism is the quintessence of terrorism and fanaticism.

Europe Europe could become a supremely powerful and wondrous monoculture, reminiscent of ancient Greece, if all Europeans spoke the same language and accepted the same rational religion – the ontological mathematics of Pythagorean Illuminism. Europe would have to declare monotheism illegal as an inherently intolerant belief system. All public expressions, symbols and clothing associated with monotheistic religions would be banned. All monotheistic parents would be forbidden from brainwashing and mutilating their children in the name of their “God”. Europe would exemplify a monoculture with many different variations on the theme, giving each European nation its distinctive flavour, just as all ancient Greek city states had theirs.

The Fools, the Fools

“Our foes are strong and wise and wary; but, strong and wise and wary as they are, they cannot undo the miracles of God Who ripens in the hearts of young men the seeds sown by the young men of a former generation. And the seeds sown by the young men of ‘65 and ‘67 are coming to their miraculous ripening today. Rulers and Defenders of the Realm had need to be wary if they would guard against such processes. Life springs from death; and from the graves of patriot men and women spring living nations. The Defenders of this Realm have worked well in secret and in the open. They think that they have pacified Ireland. They think that they have purchased half of us and intimidated the other half. They think that they have foreseen everything, think that they have provided against everything; but, the fools, the fools, the fools! — They have left us our Fenian dead, and while Ireland holds these graves, Ireland unfree shall never be at peace.” – Pádraig Pearse in 1915 in his graveside oration at the funeral of the Fenian leader Jeremiah O’Donovan Rossa. Pearse was the leader of the Irish Easter Uprising of 1916 against British Imperial and Colonial rule in Ireland. Irish rebellion against foreign tyranny proceeded by way of secret societies.

Proletarian Artillery For many rebels and revolutionaries across the world, dynamite was regarded as “the proletarian artillery”. Nowadays, the AK-47 (Kalashnikov) gives irregular forces similar firepower to regular forces.

Done “I am done. I am done.” – Ned Kelly, Australian outlaw, as he fell under a hail of police gunfire.

Lobbying Is lobbying acceptable in any political system? The most successful, powerful and influential lobbyists are the richest lobbyists, working for the richest clients. To say that you support lobbying is to say that you support the right of the rich to unduly influence the political system in their own favour and against the interests of the people – which makes you an enemy of the people.

The Halo Effect “The halo effect or halo error is a cognitive bias in which one’s judgments of a person’s character can be influenced by one’s overall impression of him or her.” – Wikipedia Nothing contributes more to the halo effect than financial success. Rich people are regarded as people with weightier, more valuable opinions. The amount of money they have is deemed equivalent to the weight of their words. Nietzsche provided the antidote to the halo effect: “Success has always been the greatest liar.”

Advice People are very good at giving advice, and very poor at receiving it. People are very good talkers and very poor listeners. People are very good at believing their own propaganda, and everything that suits them, and very poor at believing others’ propaganda and everything that doesn’t suit them. You need to be rational to be able to consider arguments objectively, carefully and dispassionately. Most people, being extremely emotional, simply cannot think rationally.

The Irrational The irrational always think they are exemplars of human rationality. That’s humanity’s tragedy. Know thyself said the ancient Greeks. No one listened. People don’t know themselves at all. They all believe their own propaganda.

The First Terrorists Who were the first terrorists? “‘Terrorism’ comes from the French word terrorisme, and originally referred specifically to state terrorism as practised by the French government during the Reign of terror. The French word terrorisme in turn derives from the Latin verb terreō meaning ‘I frighten’. The terror cimbricus was a panic and state of emergency in Rome in response to the approach of warriors of the Cimbri tribe in 105 BC. The Jacobins cited this

precedent when imposing a Reign of Terror during the French Revolution. After the Jacobins lost power, the word ‘terrorist’ became a term of abuse. Although ‘terrorism’ originally referred to acts committed by a government, currently it usually refers to the killing of innocent people for political purposes in such a way as to create a media spectacle. This meaning can be traced back to Sergey Nechayev, who described himself as a ‘terrorist’. Nechayev founded the Russian terrorist group ‘People’s Retribution’ in 1869.” – Wikipedia In truth, the State (the unjust State) has always ruled by terror. Nowadays, terrorism is associated with non-State groups seeking to overthrow the State. Anarchists, libertarians, nihilists, religious fundamentalists and political freedom fighters have all sought to violently overthrow the State.

Freedom Fighters and Patriots or Anarchists and Libertarians? It’s obvious that repressive governments that are acting in the interests of elites rather than the people should have all their secrets for oppressing and conning the people revealed. We are all for whistle blowers who support better government and a stronger State serving the General Will. However, we are totally opposed to people attacking the principle of the State and wishing to overthrow any conceivable government and State. The question has to be asked if people like Julian Assange and Edward Snowden are the good guys fighting the good fight or subversives who despise government, any government. Is their aim to reveal those things that should not be kept from the people, or to bring down government entirely? Are Assange, Snowden and the like actually anarchists and libertarians, “patriots” and free-market capitalists who are opposed to any government rather than bad government? Are there times when government should maintain absolute secrecy? Of course there are. So, do we want the likes of Assange and Snowden wrecking those secret councils that serve rather than oppose the General Will? The leaders of the American, French and Russian Revolutions were all highly secretive. They needed to be. The people who say that secrets are inherently wrong are naive fools living in a fantasy land. Wikileaks is itself a tremendously secretive organisation that does everything to protect itself. Journalists will always protect their sources and

never reveal their identities. Secrets are part and parcel of life and for the healthy functioning of society. No one anywhere has an absolute right to all information. Only utter narcissists believe they have. Let’s see how the masses would like it if all their financial details were released for all to see. Would Assange and Snowden be garlanded if they revealed all your health records, annual salary and tax details, school and college exam results, management assessments of you, and so on? If you demand data protection – i.e. the keeping secret of your private information – aren’t you a total hypocrite if in the next breath you demand the end of secrecy, of secret societies and government secrets? One law for them and another for you, is that it? Imagine that a left wing government secretly undertook a secret project to spy on corporations and the super rich to see how much they were engaging in tax avoidance and evasion. Would you be happy for Assange and Snowden to blow the whistle and alert the elites to that? You’re mad if you think that secrets aren’t necessary and that people must never act secretly on occasion for the greater good. Don’t get sucked into the childish and naive notion that the world should be free of secrets. All human beings hold secrets in their private lives and would be appalled if these were made known as a matter of course. We couldn’t live together in the world if we all told each other exactly what we thought of each other. We need the social silences. We need the social masks. We need the social etiquette. These are all concerned with secrets and lies, but they are essential to the smooth operations of society, from the workplace to the home. Only morons demand total information availability and the abolition of all secrets. Such people are often on the autistic spectrum. Autistics cannot fall in love and cannot lie – and the ability to love and to lie in fact have the same root in empathy and the theory of mind, in which autistics are lacking. Julian Assange is definitely on the autistic spectrum and Edward Snowden’s demeanour gives every indication that he is too. Do we really want autistics dictating to “normals”? Do we really want to live in a world designed for people who can neither love nor lie, who have no imagination or intuition and who want everything laid out for everyone to see, a world with no shades, no subtlety and no subtext? Get real. Know thyself.

***** By all accounts, Snowden is an extreme right wing, anti-Statist anarchist and libertarian who is known to have donated money to the campaign of libertarian nutcase Ron Paul. Therefore, he’s no friend of ours and we have no sympathy for him. He’s part of the right wing movement to overthrow the government and State and replace them with free-market capitalism and corporatocracy. Why do people like Snowden never expose the secrets of Goldman Sachs and the huge banks and corporations that actually run the world, with no public accountability whatsoever? In Britain, Snowden’s revelations were published by The Guardian, a liberal newspaper on the soft left that would never agree with Snowden’s right wing sentiments, but which tactically agreed with him on the subject of democratic governments spying on their citizens. An unholy alliance is growing between liberals and libertarians, between left and right wing anarchists, against the government and State.

***** How many people will be cheering for Snowden if there’s a huge increase in successful terrorist attacks because the security services can no longer filter global communications for suspicious activity (“chatter”) that precedes terrorist operations?

The Snowden File “Some outlets reported last week that NSA leaker and fugitive Edward Snowden was caught in a bit of hypocrisy: public chat records indicate that back in the ancient times of 2009, he wanted leakers ‘shot in the balls.’ Yeah, he said that. But that’s not all he said. Oh, no. The Technology site Ars Technica posted extensive public chat logs from Snowden, then using the moniker TheTrueHOOHA, that confirms what I had suspected since finding his campaign contributions to Glenn Greenwald’s straight crush Ron Paul. “So let’s talk about this man that has been granted hero status by the Left’s loudest prognosticators and provocateurs. The transcripts released by Ars Technica are about a lot more than Snowden’s previous contempt for leakers. He hated social security, loved Ron Paul and his ideas, and peddled the NRA’s garbage about fighting the government with guns. He suggested

punishing both leakers and publications that publish the leaks. All in all, Edward Snowden is a right wing, anti-government nutjob who has managed to become the hero of so many on the reactionary Left. “Ars Technica reports that Ed Snowden is not much more than your typical, teabagging, cookie-cutter right wing nutjob who hates Obama. He complained about everything from the president’s appointment to the CIA to gun control to how Social Security has turned old people into lazy moochers. “Once Obama took office, Snowden groaned about his policies with increasing frequency. Fears that Obama might revive an assault weapons ban didn’t sit well with him as a defender of the Second Amendment. Another sticking point was social security. Snowden was an individualist, even when it was unpopular; he saw little need for a safety net. “Here are just some of the choice quotes from the freakout Left’s new hero. I have modified the transcripts only to change “TheTrueHOOHA” to “SNOWDEN” (for ease of following), and to highlight through formatting. SNOWDEN: See, that’s why I’m goddamned glad for the second amendment. Me and all my lunatic, gun-toting NRA compatriots would be on the steps of Congress before the C-Span feed finished. SNOWDEN: Save money? Cut this social security bullshit. SNOWDEN: Somehow, our society managed to make it hundreds of years without social security just fine. SNOWDEN: You fucking retards. SNOWDEN: Magically the world changed after the new deal, and old people became made of glass. SNOWDEN: They wouldn’t be fucking helpless if you weren’t sending them fucking checks to sit on their ass and lay in hospitals all day. SNOWDEN: My grandmother is eighty fucking three this year, and you know what? She still supports herself working as a goddamned hairdresser. SNOWDEN: WTF NYTIMES. Are they TRYING to start a war? Jesus Christ. They’re like Wikileaks. They’re reporting classified shit. Moreover, who the fuck are the anonymous sources telling them this? Those people should be shot in the balls.

SNOWDEN: These are the same people who blew the whole ‘we could listen to Osama’s cell phone’ thing the same people who screwed us on wiretapping over and over and over again [sic]. Thank god they’re going out of business. Hopefully the NYT will finally go bankrupt this year. “Edward Snowden is a pathetic excuse for a hero or a whistleblower. He is a lunatic libertarian far-right nutjob that compromised national security for his personal fame. He has no values, no ethics, no moral core. He is a right wing blowhard that is playing the Professional Left for everything they are worth (which, thankfully, is not much). He is using their Blind hatred of a black president named Barack Obama to make them do the bidding of his own agenda which has nothing to do with transparency nor democracy. And the Professional Left is running right along, singing the praises of this ringwing nutjob, licking this traitor’s boots.” – http://www.thepeoplesview.net/2013/07/how-professional-lefts-blindobama.html So, be careful about whom you support. People typically have two reasons for doing things: the professed reason (noble) and the real reason (narcissistic and self-serving). Edward Snowden is no one noble.

***** The 9/11 conspiracy theory is an anarchist and libertarian attempt to portray government as a lethal threat to the governed. Snowden has opened a second front: to show government as permanently spying on its citizens, like Big Brother. The aim of Snowden and his right wing co-conspirators is not to reform government and make it represent the people better but to destroy it and have the world taken over by the right wing super rich, who will rule without any government at all. The people will then have no more say over how they are governed than they have over Goldman Sachs or Coca Cola. The unelected, unaccountable super rich will rule us via the “free” market, which is not free at all, of course, but entirely rigged by the elite cartels.

The Snowden Delusion The Edward Snowden gang hate the State and State power. They support individual rights rather than collective rights. They are extreme right

wingers and they have strategically entered into an alliance with left wing anarchists who also want to bring down the State. Are you for them or against them? Bear this in mind ... 9/11 would never have happened if the world’s intelligence services had been able to “spy” on all the internet traffic between the Muslim terrorists. There’s always a trade-off between security and “freedom”. The issue is not about surveillance per se. It’s about who guards the guards and how we can trust and monitor the guards. If the guards are harming the people, they must be removed. If they are defending the people and protecting them, they must be supported. Irresponsible and reckless libertarian and anarchist arguments are no solution. They are for people who analyse the world with the sophistication of five-year-old children.

The “Free” Press? We often hear American and European politicians promoting the “virtues” of the free press. Yet what happens when we actually look at the press in media in America and Europe? We find that nearly all of it is owned, run and controlled by extremely rich, extremely right wing oligarchs, moguls and barons constantly deploying the propaganda of the establishment, of “freedom and democracy”, of free-market capitalism, and increasingly of anti-government, anti-State libertarianism. So, when people talk about the free press, what they mean in practice is the complete freedom of the rich to engage in mass mind control of the poor, to continuously bombard them with the propaganda of why it’s right that the rich are in charge and should stay in charge. There are no “free” journalists or reporters in the world. All journalists and reporters are chosen because they reflect the ideology of the ruling elite, or say and write things that are no serious challenge to that ideology. Would the contents of this book, or any of our other books, ever feature in the mainstream press or media, except to be ridiculed and dismissed? You must be joking. Given that we are calling for the overthrow of the rich elites, for the abolition of privilege and the imposition of 100% inheritance tax, you can be sure we would never be given a platform by the media controllers.

They don’t mind us being a tiny, irritating voice on the periphery, stuck with the conspiracy theorists and loony tunes – since all of these can be mocked and disregarded as a matter of course. The periphery is no conceivable threat to the centre. So, no, we have no respect for journalists and reporters, and we completely reject the claim that they reflect freedom. What they do reflect is the establishment’s ideology, and that is nothing to do with the freedom of the people. The best journalism and reporting is actually performed by sociologists, psychologists and postmodernist philosophers, but their work appears in journals and books and is ignored unless it chimes with the right wing agenda. The “freedom” of the press and media is yet another illusion. Only the right wing worldview is allowed to be freely expressed. Left wing views are totally suppressed in the mainstream. The McCarthy witch-hunt never went away. It became internalised and part of the “complicitous” silence. No one any longer needed to do any explicit campaigning against the left. It was simply assumed by everyone that the left was wrong, evil and must be given no voice. In America, there’s an extremely vociferous right wing lobby. There’s no left wing equivalent. In fact, America, in its entire history, has never seriously expressed any left wing views or had any real left wing presence. Thomas Jefferson was America’s most left wing political thinker and yet is now regarded by many as a proto right wing libertarian who hated government and the State. The idea – the true idea – that Jefferson was actually an Illuminist, a Jacobin, a hater of the power of the rich, an enthusiast for the French Revolution, and someone who may well have been a socialist or even a communists if he had lived several decades later, is totally dismissed. After all, how could that possibly serve the agenda, the loaded agenda, of the “free” press?

***** What is “free” about the press and media anyway? You have to pay for them, often very expensively. They’re part of the capitalist profit machine, so how can non-capitalists compete? Think of how different the press and media would be if all the financial constraints and elite gatekeepers were removed. Well, we can already see

what happens ... on the internet. Radically different voices are heard. Opinions that would never be aired in the mainstream are everywhere. You have to ask yourself who it is who decides what content the mainstream press and media should express. The answer of course is that their rich capitalist owners decide. What is so radical about the internet is that there are vast swathes of it that are wholly outside the direct control of the capitalist owners and their gatekeepers. This will eventually prove fatal to the press and media establishment. They will become less and less relevant in people’s lives. Already, many newspapers are going bankrupt or having to be heavily subsidised by other operations of the same business empire. Isn’t it astounding that the mainstream press and media almost totally ignore the radical content on the internet and never give it any publicity? It’s as if two parallel worlds now exist. Yet the elite won’t make the radical voices go away by ignoring them. They’ll simply make them even more radical. The Owner Class and the Gatekeeper Class are losing their power. Eventually, no one will be listening to them at all.

***** We are told that the “free” press hold government to account. How absurd is it that capitalist commercial organisations run by unelected, unaccountable media barons and moguls, and which employ unelected, unaccountable cheerleaders and apologists for capitalism, should be those we rely on to keep government honest. If you’ve ever met a journalist or reporter, you wouldn’t trust them to hold their own coat. They’re amongst the vilest, most unscrupulous and immoral people you could ever encounter. The government should of course be accountable to the people, not to the commercial right wing press and media.

Freedom of Information Activists campaign for Freedom of Information. Then activists campaign for Data Protection. Well, what’s it to be – information available to all or information protected?

Cats and Dogs

Look around you at all the cats and dogs in the world. These animals are the ones most closely connected to human beings. They are the ones most likely to be reincarnated as humans in their next life. Have a good look at all the people around you. You can recognise “cat people” and “dog people”, can’t you? Western Abrahamism is for dog people and Eastern religion for cat people. It may take many human lives for the cat and dog people to escape from their cat or dog ancestry and become fully human, fully Apollonian and rational.

***** Dogs are often described as “man’s best friend”. In fact, the people who like dogs were probably dogs in their last life and the reason they’re friends with dogs is that they themselves were recently dogs! The more human you are, the less likely you are to have pets. You have no interest in beasts. Your eyes look upwards and forwards, not downwards and backwards. Your gaze is set on the divine world, not the animal world. Animals are primitives. What does it say about you if you choose to spend your time in their company?

The Truth? A young man with Tourette’s Syndrome went on a date with an attractive girl. Afterwards, he was asked how it went. He said, “She seems like a really nice girl ... fucking slag!” So, what was his true opinion? Was it his social self, his masked self (persona), that said she was nice while his real self (ego) thought she was a total slag? Or are we all binary thinkers, i.e. as soon as we think someone is nice, we also create a notion of them as “not nice”, and we promote the former while burying the latter. Perhaps Tourette’s Syndrome simply releases all of the binary opposite concepts of the opinions we actually hold. The more intensely you want to say one thing, the more intensely you have to bury its opposite. It acquires a tremendous energy in your unconscious mind in the right hemisphere of your brain. Your Shadow Self attracts all of this suppressed negative energy. Perhaps Tourette’s Syndrome is the uncontrollable vocalisation of the thoughts of your own Shadow. Is Abrahamism humanity’s collective expression of the Shadow? Is it a kind of Tourette’s? People can’t help blurting out the opposite of what they

ought to be saying and thinking.

Psychodrama We do not inhabit a “world”. We inhabit a collective psychodrama. And that’s why people are so addicted to soap operas that perfectly reflect this Mythos psychodrama in which we are all forced participants.

The Local Weather We all create a “climate” around ourselves. We all experience turbulent weather. We can all be stormy, sunny, windy, hot, cold, misty, icy, snowy, rainy, volcanic, earth-shattering (earthquakes), and we are all capable of extreme weather – twisters, cyclones, typhoons, hurricanes, El Niño.

The Anarchist Question “To those people who say they need government to regulate their life, my question to you is pretty simple... What do you need government for? Does someone want to answer this question?” – An anarchist Why don’t you try studying Plato, Hobbes, Rousseau, Hegel, Marx and many other political philosophers to understand why? Here’s a question for anarchists: How can you have civilisation and society without rules, rulers, laws and systems? How can you justly, fairly, rationally and peacefully settle disputes between conflicting elements without an overarching power to which all parties are willing to go for arbitration? An anarchy is simply the jungle where anything goes. Who in their right mind would want to live there other than psychopaths? There is only one law in the jungle – Might is Right. Exactly the same is true in an anarchy. Government is the antidote to the jungle and the essential prerequisite for civilisation and society.

Leviathan As Thomas Hobbes recognised, the State must be a Leviathan to all troublemakers. They must fear its power and know it will be used to crush them if they disobey the General Will (as anarchists and libertarians do in pursuit of their own particular wills and selfish, anti-State aims).

Of course, if the Leviathan is malevolent and acts against the General Will and in favour of the particular wills of elites (as happens in capitalist “democracies”) then it must be resisted and overthrown. The task is to establish a benevolent Leviathan to rationally and justly keep law and order and to enforce equal opportunities for all.

The American Government Shutdown Who was responsible for the 2013 shutdown of the American government? A) the pro-State, pro-Government Democrats. or B) the anti-State, anti-Government anarchist right wingers of the Tea Party and Republican Party. Anarchists are a catastrophe for civilisation and society. It’s not even as though there’s one type of anarchist. You have left and right wing anarchists with polar opposite visions of how anarchies should operate. Here’s a question for all anarchists – how will you deal with those anarchists who belong to the opposite end of the political spectrum from you and who will never conduct themselves in the way you want?

Government All forms of unjust authority should be opposed, but not just, meritorious authority. The aim of politics is to establish the form of government that’s completely just and this is exactly the task accomplished by the political dialectic. We now understand the dialectic well enough to go straight to its conclusion. In the case of politics, this is meritocratic government. Anarchists demand the overthrow of all authority, whether just or unjust, rational or irrational. good or bad. In fact, anarchists assert that authority is inherently wrong and bad. There is absolutely no evidence for this. There is endless evidence, on the other hand, that human society cannot function without rules, rulers and authority. Meritocracy supports the “round table” model over the pyramidal hierarchy. This does not mean that hierarchy is abolished. What it means is that everyone gets a fair chance. Someone who is an excellent economist be useless at many other disciplines. Where he excels, he can be top of a

hierarchy. Where he does not, he might find himself at the bottom. The overall effect is that no one has an entrenched higher position over everyone else. Everything averages out, more or less, to a round table system, thus destroying dynastic elites. Meritocracy is not about equal outcomes, as in Communism. It’s about equal opportunities and then fair competition to secure the best jobs and most influential positions. There is nothing wrong with fair competition, only with unfair, rigged competition, of the type we find in societies based on privilege. If someone wins a prestigious competition and is awarded a prize of a million dollars, that’s fine. If he then passes on that money to some slob who did not compete and did not win then that’s not fine. That means that someone has received the prize for victory without actually being the victor. This is what inheritance is all about. Someone who competes and gets rich then passes on his winnings to his children who have not competed and not won, and they then acquire an enormous advantage even though, in all probability, they are enormously inferior competitors. This represents anti-competition, decadence and degeneration. It leads to an inevitable decline in human quality and allows the weak and pathetic to hold power, which they do utterly ineptly – as world history has proved. In a Meritocracy, we are all equal in terms of being given the resources to become the best people we can possibly make of ourselves, but some of us will make far more of ourselves than others. That’s life.

***** “Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty. The obedient must be slaves.” – Henry David Thoreau This is the typical nonsense spouted by anarchists. In fact, obeying the General Will is the true foundation of both liberty and civilisation. If you disobey the General Will in order to satisfy your own particular will (which is the essence of negative liberty, anarchy and selfishness) then you will find yourself at war with all those who object to your attempts to place your personal liberties over theirs. You certainly won’t be free. You don’t even understand freedom. Freedom doesn’t mean getting what you want regardless of others. People like Thoreau want to enslave others, to make others bow to their whims and desires.

The Confederacy didn’t want to obey the Union. Did that make the Confederates champions of liberty? Or did it make them those who wanted to fight to keep others as their slaves – making them evil tyrants? The rhetoric of “liberty” is the most abused in history. Run a mile when an anarchist starts talking about his liberty, or get your gun. He means his liberty, not yours. You are to be his slave.

***** Thoreau was a prototype anarcho-capitalist libertarian. He opposed taxation and wrote an essay called Resistance to Civil Government (also known as Civil Disobedience) about disobedience to an unjust state. Yet who defines what is “unjust”? Thoreau was an abolitionist, yet the Confederacy could have used almost everything he said to defend their rejection of the Union (which was unjust and tyrannical from their perspective, hence to be resisted). And this is the whole problem with these anarchist and libertarian positions. Anyone, no matter how vile, can lay claim to them.

***** Thoreau famously went to live in a cabin in the woods near Walden Pond, where he lived a simple life without support of any kind. This, of course, is the essence of these anti-social, anti-community individualists, who simply want to retreat from the world and from civilisation. If everyone behaved like Thoreau, humanity would regress to the caves and the primordial slime. Humanity would make no progress. We would never become Gods. However, since these people have nothing to contribute to society and do not even want to participate in society, they should be given their wish. Land should be set aside for them to live in their primitive way, and they should be permanently excluded from the State that they hold in such contempt.

Profession Versus Trade A professional is a person who has a university education and qualification; no one without that background is a professional. A tradesperson is someone who has been trained in a particular trade, learning on the job, so to speak. Someone without any relevant

qualifications can be taken on as a tradesperson, but would not be accepted for a professional role. Tradespeople often serve an on-the-job apprenticeship. Trades typically rely on physical skill and dexterity and are less cerebral. Some trades – such as journalism – can require a degree of intelligence but other general skills are usually of more importance, such as a “nose for a story”, perseverance, being opinionated, not caring about those damaged by your story, having low ethics and no scruples, willingness to lie and take risks, willingness to con people, and so on. Many professionals would never consider becoming journalists. Professionals are typically doctors, lawyers, accountants, economists, professors, architects, teachers, scientists and so one, while tradespeople are carpenters, mechanics, plumbers, electricians, beauticians, waitresses and waiters.

Jesus Christ – Victim or Victor? Eastern Christendom believes that Western Christendom depicts Jesus Christ as one of the downtrodden, as a victim, a loser, and promotes the cult of victimhood. It could, however, choose instead to portray him as a great hero overcoming Satan and redeeming humanity. He could be presented in terms of strength rather the weakness. Yet there’s no doubt that Western Christendom has produced a far more powerful Mythos than the East. Jesus is made much more human by showing him as vulnerable rather than an invulnerable divinity (which is actually what he was if you believe in Christianity).

Closer to God? Throughout history, certain people have claimed to be closer to God. They are: monarchs, high priests, prophets, dictators, shamans, saints, hermits, and even the super rich. Such people have always thought themselves above the law, and subject only to God’s law. Charles I of England refused to acknowledge the court set up by Oliver Cromwell to try him for treason against the nation. He considered himself above the law, and indeed as the source of law. He had no peers, he said, no equals to try him and pronounce judgment on him. God alone could judge him. Yet he was found guilty and executed all the same.

Are these people actually insane? Charles I was hiding behind an absurd Mythos, to which Cromwell and his New Model Army did not subscribe. In those circumstances, “God” becomes revealed for what it is: an empty, impotent idea.

The Tax Game Businesses are taxed on profits, not on income. So, when a multinational corporation makes a large profit in country A, it does not call it “profit in country A”, but, rather, “royalties owed to the company’s head office in country B” – which, surprise, surprise, is a tiny tax haven with an enormously more favourable tax regime. So, “profits” are simply relabelled, allowing them to be treated as non-taxable “costs” and transferred to somewhere else where they miraculously become profits again, but subject to much lower tax, or no tax at all.

Anthropology The world consists of tribes: religious, economic, political, social and psychological. The army is a tribe, the police force is a tribe, the legal profession is a tribe, the intelligence services are tribes. (In fact, we might even replace the word “tribe” with the more provocative “gang”.) The elite are a tribe, and should be analysed anthropologically. The elite are as exotic as any of the lost tribes of the Amazon.

Great Britain Why is Britain called “Great”? It was to differentiate it from Brittany in France, which was referred to as Less, Lesser or Little Britain.

The Success of the Internet People love the internet because it’s where they can tell the world about themselves. The internet is driven by social networking, narcissism, egoism, self-indulgence, self-expression (no matter how ignorant and irrational) and self-aggrandisement. It’s all about fakes, phoneys and frauds.

America and Syria 1) Who made America the world policeman rather than the United Nations?

2) What about America’s vast arsenal of weapons of mass destruction? 3) What about the catastrophic failure of the American intelligence services when they insisted Iraq had WMD while Iraq insisted it did not? Iraq was telling the truth, not America. 4) Who authorised American drone strikes in the sovereign air space of other nations? Should the world tell America to desist or face being bombed? Drone attacks are technically an act of war. 5) What about what America did to the innocent men, women and children of Vietnam – (in the millions!)? What about napalm, Agent Orange and carpet bombing? What sanctions were imposed on America? Has America apologised? Have any American leaders been indicted as war criminals? Or is it one law for America and a different law for everyone else? Is it a case of “Might is Right” and “victors’ justice”? Why should America be the judge of morality? Shouldn’t we pass moral sentence on American freemarket capitalism and the damage it has done to the world? 6) In the Vietnam War, America crossed the red line. Its conduct of the war was wholly unacceptable. It waged a campaign of mass terrorism and slaughter against innocent Vietnamese civilians. It was interfering in another nation’s right to self-determination, and using force to impose American ideology on them. It did not hesitate to use chemical warfare against civilians. American proved itself a brutal terrorist nation. Given its disgraceful track record, how dare this nation preach to the world. 7) America is the most dangerous nation on earth, the country with the most WMD and a bigger military budget than all other countries put together. It has more guns than citizens. America is the home of the military-industrial complex that wages war for profit. It also sponsors the Zionists who are a primary cause of Islamic discontent, fundamentalism and terrorism. 8) When Israel illegally invaded the Gaza Strip and used white phosphorus bombs, America fully supported the Zionists and said they were “fighting terrorism”. When President Assad attacked Al-Qaeda terrorist waging jihad in Syria, he was condemned as a dictator and terrorist. One always knows that America will stand by Zionist Israel no matter what atrocities it commits, and will always condemn any forces opposed to the Zionists. America is a wholly partisan nation and no kind of neutral peacemaker. It

should be condemned by the United Nations and ordered to keep its nose out of the internal affairs of other sovereign countries.

A Cause A sacred cause trumps even the family. In civil wars, siblings are often on opposite sides. They have chosen opposite sides because they have chosen the reverse sides of the sacred cause. In the American civil war, the North and South both fought for the sacred cause of freedom, but from inverse perspectives. The North thought that any free society must be one without slavery. The South thought that a free society was one where you should be free even to enslave others, and not to be dictated to by government and the State. Extreme right wingers, especially anarcho-capitalist libertarians, have always placed their personal freedom above that of anyone else. For them, being free means being free to enslave others, to treat others with contempt, to refuse to do business with people they don’t like, to subject others to their personal choices even when they know their choices are rejected by others. We see this obnoxious and perverse definition of freedom in the attitude of Muslim women wearing the burqa in Western societies where they know that their choice is viewed with extreme negativity. They call on government to protect their right to be obnoxious towards others, and to defend them against discrimination. A multicultural negative liberty State tends to bend over backwards to accommodate such people. A positive liberty State would take legal action against them to stop them imposing their hateful views and behaviour in the public space. You can do whatever you like in your own private space. When you enter the public space, it’s an entirely different matter. No State committed to freedom would ever tolerate the attitudes of the Southern Confederacy. In essence, right wingers emphasize personal freedom (the freedom of the private individual) and oppose interference from government and the State, i.e. they support negative liberty. Left wingers emphasize social freedom (the freedom of the individual within a public arena where it’s understood that there’s a huge conflict between what different people want and expect), i.e. they support positive liberty whereby the government and State will attempt to impose standards on the people that reflect the General Will rather than particular wills.

All political debates, when you really get down to it, are clashes between those who support negative liberty (pro individual; anti-government and State; right wing) and positive liberty (pro community; pro-government and State; left wing). In others terms, it’s all about selfish individuals (negative libertarians) versus altruistic individuals (positive libertarians). It’s all about those who value the Freudian id first and foremost (negative libertarians) versus those who emphasize the superego (positive libertarians). The right wing rhetoric of “freedom” can be highly seductive to those who always want and expect to get their own way and don’t want the government and State ever imposing any standards of conduct on them (which they see as tyrannical). Ayn Rand’s ideology was all about the “rational”, selfish individual. In fact, all right wingers are fundamentally irrational and obsessed with their own feelings and desires. No rational person could ever imagine that they would be free to do whatever they like in a world of many different personality types, all with conflicting tastes, aims, beliefs and personal values. Left wingers understand that government and the State may well know better than the individual (because the State can call on its most smart and talented citizens), while right wingers always think the individual knows best. Left wingers are “Catholics” (universalists) while right wingers are “Protestants” (individualists). In every conflict you care to mention, you will see left and right wing ideologies clashing, negative and positive liberty, Catholics and Protestants. It’s always about individualism versus collectivism, the private versus the public, the particular versus the general, feelings versus reason. Feelings are always individualistic and reason is always collectivist. Feelings are all about Mythos and reason about Logos. There’s only one mathematics, one rational way forward, one Logos. There are countless stories, a Mythos for every individual, countless different views of the way forward. It has been estimated that there are over 40,000 Protestant sects, while there is only one Catholicism. Catholicism, as its name says, strives to be universal. Protestantism, on the other hand, continuously splinters because it’s all about the private and individual, and rejects the public and collective (which is regarded as “tyrannical”).

Capitalism “Corporation: An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility.” – Ambrose Bierce Capitalist banking: An ingenious device for generating vast profits for individuals, and even vaster losses, which are assigned to the people (through bail outs). A system for capitalising profits for the elite and socialising losses (so that the elite don’t lose a cent). Virtuous circle (meritocracy) versus vicious circle (free market capitalism).

Risk and Reward Nothing has changed in Wall Street since the financial meltdown of 2008. Traders are still allowed to take extreme risks with other’s people’s money to generate vast profits for themselves. There are no downsides; no penalties are imposed on them if their gambles go horrifically wrong. They have no personal accountability or responsibility for their gambles. If the gamble pays off, they win massively. If the gamble fails, they lose nothing. This system therefore does nothing but incentivise irresponsible, reckless risk taking. The people who are employed by Wall Street tend to be on the psychopath spectrum, and have zero consideration for others. You could not imagine a system better designed to produce boom and bust. But, in this global economy, the next bust will be terminal for capitalism. The capitalists are so greedy and deluded that they have simply never grasped this, and never will. Capitalism is dead man walking.

***** Financial derivatives have become wholly decoupled from a real economy: a real economy of real things being bought and sold. They are abstractions, mathematical instruments inhabiting a virtual reality in cyberspace. And yet the global economy is completely tied to this “funny money”, illusory money not grounded in anything real, but only in fantasy valuations of things that have long since parted company from real assets.

The Logic of Propaganda

“This is the secret of propaganda: To totally saturate the person, whom the propaganda wants to lay hold of, with the ideas of the propaganda, without him even noticing that he is being saturated.” – Paul Watzlawick “The orchestration of press, radio and television to create a continuous, lasting and total environment renders the influence of propaganda virtually unnoticed precisely because it creates a constant environment.” – Jacques Ellul “The oblique paradox of propaganda is that the lie in the throat becomes, by repetition, the truth in the heart.” – John Grierson “They make revolutionary propaganda because they know the privileged class can never be overturned peacefully.” – Johann Most “That’s basically what’s going on now: Everything is propaganda.” – Lindsey Buckingham

Falsifiability The Abrahamic religions all made two ultra-prominent scientifically falsifiable statements: that the sun revolves around the earth, and the earth is the centre of the universe. Science has demonstrated that neither is true. Therefore, if Abrahamists were rational, they would accept that their holy texts – which are supposed to be the infallible Word of God – have been refuted, hence cannot be the Word of God. However, religion and faith have nothing to do with reason and proof. People believe for all sorts of psychological reasons intertwined with their fears, hopes, dreams and identity. They will never abandon their identity, no matter what. Irrational people never abandon their religion for rational reasons ... only because of some crisis of faith that has overwhelmed them, and then they may well turn to some other irrational religion! Religion is pure propaganda, and people are queuing up to believe it wholesale.

The Lost Temple In ancient Israel, the Jewish religion revolved around the fixed Temple in Jerusalem. The Temple was the centre of the Jewish world. When the

Temple fell, the Jewish world should have ended, and the Jewish religion should have died. Unfortunately, the Jews also had the concept of the “tabernacle” – the temporary and portable sanctuary in which the Ark of the Covenant was placed prior to the building of the Jerusalem Temple. So, when the Temple and the Ark vanished from the world, the Jews returned to the concept of “portable Judaism”. Ancient Jewish propaganda is as potent today as it was back then. The Jews still haven’t wised up. They’re still buying the oldest lie. The Jews’ entire identity is now invested in their own propaganda. They can’t give up their absurd beliefs without abandoning their identity. Rational people can decide that something is false and move onto something better and more productive. They can construct a new identity and lead wonderful lives. But not the irrational Jews. If the Holocaust didn’t prove to them that they aren’t the Chosen People, nothing ever could. The Jews are now simply a mad people keeping alive a mad and refuted belief system that became redundant and ridiculous 2,000 years ago. That’s the power of propaganda.

The Synagogue of Satan Synagogue: “congregation of Jews”, from ancient Greek synagoge “place, house of assembly”. Jehovah = the Devil. The Jews = the Damned. The Synagogue = the House of the Devil. Jerusalem = the Unholy City, Capital of Hell. The Temple = The Devil’s Inner Sanctum. The Ark of the Covenant = the Home of the Devil.

***** The Jews are behind a vast amount of the propaganda attacks on government and the State. They are responsible for many tracts endorsing anarchism, anarcho-capitalist libertarianism and free-market capitalism.

The Stateless Jews (prior to the formation of modern Israel in a land stolen from the Palestinians, with British and American connivance) were always enemies of the State since State power was so often directed against them. The Jews seek to control the world via transnational and supranational institutions that sit above and beyond the nation state. And that’s where the free “market” of capitalism comes into play. By controlling the market, Jews could control every State on Earth. And that’s exactly what happened. What is the most capitalist nation on Earth? – America. Who controls America? – the Jewish banks and media; Jewish Wall Street. Why is America’s foreign policy fanatically pro-Zionist? – because America is the culmination of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. These are described in Wikipedia as an “anti-Semitic hoax purporting to describe a Jewish plan for global domination”. Yet the Jews have dominated the world through free-market capitalism, control of the global banking system and stock markets, and capitalist globalisation where capital owes no loyalty to any nation states. Isn’t it bizarre that we are told that the Protocols of the Elders of Zion are a hoax when anyone with eyes to see can see exactly who’s running the world! Who’s kidding who? What propaganda are you swallowing? The people who say the Protocols are a hoax are – guess who? – the Jews! Have you ever once seen any mainstream newspaper, magazine, TV documentary or movie seriously addressing the issue of Jews controlling the world? Well, guess who controls the media? – the Jews. Could you conceive for a single second the idea of any mainstream American media outlet questioning the Jews and Zionism? It’s simply unthinkable. Could you imagine any American presidential candidate refusing to have his campaign funded by Goldman Sachs? Could you imagine any American government taking any action to harm the interests of Goldman Sachs? It’s as if there’s a forcefield protecting all things Jewish. That, of course, is no accident. Who are the very last people who would want to live in Plato’s Meritocratic pagan Republic? – the Jews.

How To Take Over The World Control the Money (the banks, the corporations and the stock markets).

Control the Media (Hollywood, TV, Radio, Newspapers, Magazines, books, the internet). Everything else follows. Why did the Jews fare disastrously in Nazi Germany? Because the Nazis, not the Jews, controlled the money and the media. And that’s why the Jews despise the State. Jewish philosophers rail against the likes of Plato, Rousseau and Hegel – all the advocates of the strong State. Jewish economists promote minimum Government, the small State, low public spending – everything that diminishes State power. The Jews are forever seeking to reduce State regulation and supervision. The Jews are the primary advocates of freemarket capitalism and globalisation. The Jews control the World Bank and the IMF. Are you getting the picture? All the rest is propaganda.

Imagine Imagine a world without any Jews, any Christians or any Muslims. Wouldn’t it automatically be an instantly better world in every possible way? In a Star Trek future, it’s impossible to imagine any Abrahamists. These people represent the irrational, credulous, superstitious past. They simply have no role in the future. Their beliefs become more and more irrelevant and absurd with every passing year. The only thing that sustains them is their enormous brainwashing and propaganda machine that’s allowed to be directed against vulnerable newborn babies. It’s child abuse that keeps these religions in existence. Children’s minds are filled with this nonsense until their identity is invested on it. Once that happens, a child is doomed. It’s not religion per se that’s difficult to overthrow, it’s people’s identities. When people perceive that their identity is under threat, they react fanatically and aggressively. Religion’s great “trick” is to ensure that it’s there from the outset as the major force in shaping people’s identities. Religious ceremonies such as circumcision and baptism take place within days or weeks. Very early on, children are told about heaven and hell, God and the Devil, salvation and damnation. “Good” and “evil”, and basic morality, are taught in a religious context. The only children who can successfully resist this brainwashing onslaught and assault on their minds are rationalists.

As soon as a rational child is exposed to rational ideas, he abandons irrational religious beliefs since these feel totally alien to him. He’s at home with reason. All irrational children – the vast majority – have no such escape route. Any healthy, sane, rational State must stop impressionable minds being hijacked and brainwashed by ancient superstitions. Negative liberty says that the State should stay out of the home and parents should be allowed to do whatever they like with their children without any interference. As you would expect, Jewish thinkers are the primary advocates of negative liberty. Positive liberty says that the State has a duty to prevent its citizens being damaged and corrupted and must actively intervene to protect them. In the religious context, this means that the State must protect children from their parents’ religious beliefs. The State must either declare illegal all religious indoctrination and all religious ceremonies involving everyone under the age of 18, or must use the education system to deprogram children, i.e. as soon as children are transferred from the family home to the school, they will be taught that all ancient Mythos religions are absurd, and all of the worst and wicked aspects of the Torah, Bible and Koran will be fully highlighted. Parents have no right to fill their children’s minds with junk. The State has every right to stop them. We cannot have a better world until we have higher quality citizens, and we cannot have those while we allow stupid, brainwashed parents to subject their children to the same viral brainwashing to which they themselves were subjected as children. We must break out of this perpetual brainwashing cycle that keeps religion in existence. The State must act. The State must destroy the transmission of crazy religious superstitions from adults to children. Negative libertarians will describe such a State as totalitarian and fascist. And yet any rational person can see that it’s religion that’s the most totalitarian and fascist force ever devised. Ironically, religion itself belongs to the positive liberty tradition. Religion was the very first manifestation of positive liberty. No religion ever left anyone alone to get on with their lives. Children were immediately inducted into their parents’ religion. All infidels, apostates or heretics were persecuted or even killed. This is the absolute opposite of negative liberty, so it’s extraordinary that negative libertarians are so supportive of the right of parents to brainwash their children.

The positive liberty State, by acting against positive liberty religions, is simply undoing a positive liberty error of the past, using exactly the same “logic” deployed by religions. Religions say that it is for the good and health of children that they are raised religiously. They even insist that it’s essential for the salvation of the children’s immortal souls. Likewise, the State says that it’s for the good and health of the children that they should be protected from religious beliefs until they are adults and can make up their own minds. Make no mistake, positive liberty is the only transformative force in our social world. It’s the only force associated with the collective, the community, with the “sacred cause”, and has its goal the transformation of people for the better. Of course, positive liberty can go horribly wrong and can end up transforming people for the worse – as we have seen with Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Nazism and Communism. Negative liberty, in its true, pure form is simply resistance to positive liberty systems. Anarchists and libertarians oppose the government and the State and want to be left alone as individuals. Negative liberty is opposed to the collective and to community, and to sacred causes (all of which are regarded with extreme suspicion or as downright evil). Yet negative libertarians can’t help being influenced by positive liberty systems, most especially religion. It’s actually impossible to escape from positive liberty and sacred causes in any society. The issue is not one of opposing positive liberty but of working out the optimal positive liberty system. There are many irrational, dangerous false claimants, but reason and meritocracy can lead us to the best possible outcomes. Even free-market capitalism is ultimately a positive liberty system, albeit at one step removed. Free-market capitalism is nominally a negative liberty system since it asserts that everyone should be left alone to make consumer choices as they see fit, without any interference from the State. Yet the underlying notion of free-market capitalism is that an “invisible hand” acts so as to create the optimal outcome. Free-market capitalism is, in the end, the positive liberty doctrine that the best possible world is the one in which everyone ruthlessly operates according to their maximum individual self-interest. Ayn Rand, in Atlas Shrugged, even tried to make a sacred cause of anarcho-capitalist libertarianism. Free-market capitalism is the perfect “game theory” understanding of reality. It represents the total atomisation of humanity, with everyone

competing against everyone else in the worst possible way, and yet this is supposed to lead to the best human race you can get! Anarchy, too, can be seen as a positive liberty doctrine asserting that the best human race is the one in which the government and State are abolished. So, one way or another, all systems are actually rival positive liberty systems. There is really no such thing as a negative liberty system. Anyone who makes any statement that applies to the whole human race and concerns what they believe is best for the whole human race is actually a positive libertarian, no matter what they are saying. A true negative libertarian is a hermit who speaks only for himself and has no interest at all in what the rest of the human race is doing. You would never hear from such a person or know that such a person even existed. So, we should forget “negative liberty” entirely and just see everything in terms of competing systems of positive liberty, some of which emphasise State power while others emphasise the power of religion, or of the family or of the individual.

The Success Delusion “Success has always been the greatest liar – and the ‘work’ itself is a success; the great statesman, the conqueror, the discoverer is disguised by his creations, often beyond recognition; the ‘work,’ whether of the artist or the philosopher, invents the man who has created it, who is supposed to have created it; ‘great men,’ as they are venerated, are subsequent pieces of wretched minor fiction.” – Nietzsche Do you create your work of art, or does it, once it is out there, create you? Einstein, thanks to his relativity theory, is regarded as a great genius. But does his relativity theory actually disguise Einstein’s many failings. A genius isn’t a genius all the time. A genius is usually a fallible, error-prone, clumsy, flawed person with all sorts of problems, just like everyone else. A genius is different from everyone else because he can occasionally soar to heights that others cannot reach. But the rest of the time, he’s like everyone else. Einstein was mostly an average thinker, and did very little of note after completing his relativity theory. He was by no means a genius judging by the second half of his life, and yet he was labelled a genius for all of that

time. Why? Because relativity theory existed. Since that was regarded as a work of genius and Einstein was its author then Einstein was regarded as a genius. But his genius had long since been expended by the time he died. By that time, he was no longer the genius who authored relativity theory. It was the work that created the genius Einstein, i.e. the Mythos of Einstein’s genius. By his death, Einstein was “wretched minor fiction”, yet he was still being hailed as a genius. Your highest work is what stands the test of immortality, not you. All rich people are regarded as successful, irrespective of their achievements, which may be extremely meagre, especially if they have simply inherited their money. Their wealth lies about who they really are. It disguises their failure. Mark Zuckerberg is regarded as a great success and genius because he’s the multi-billionaire founder of Facebook. Yet what was Facebook? It was just a few lines of simple code that echoed lines of code written by others who had already come up with the idea of social networking (with popular sites such as MySpace). Zuckerberg didn’t invent anything and didn’t have any radical, new ideas. He was simply better at implementing social networking on the internet than any of his rivals. Smarter, better, more innovative people than Zuckerberg have done all sorts of wonderful things, but they are all “failures” because their ideas did not take off and they did not become rich and successful, hence they are not hailed as geniuses. Failure lies as much as success. Many great geniuses are unrecognised because they were unlucky. Maybe they were far too ahead of their time, or their audience wasn’t of high enough calibre to appreciate them. By the same token, many fools are treated as geniuses because they were lucky. Luck is often the most important thing. Don’t fall for the propaganda of the rich that they are rich because they deserve to be. Most got lucky, or had their wealth handed to them on a plate. There’s not a single rich capitalist who could ever stand in the same company as the greatest scientists, mathematicians, philosophers or artists. Not one. It’s a category error to call someone like Zuckerberg or Gates a genius. They are just guys from rich, privileged backgrounds who found themselves in the right place at the right time with the right product. Many others could have done the same thing but just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time with the wrong product. You couldn’t judge beforehand which would “succeed” and which would “fail”. That’s where

the luck comes in. And then the propaganda kicks in, insisting that the people who “made it” were geniuses all along. At least Einstein had a brilliant theory to preach the lie that he was a genius all his life. Mark Zuckerberg only has Facebook, and you can be certain that something new will come along and replace it. The inventor of Facebook’s replacement won’t be any genius either... just another guy who got lucky. Don’t believe the hype!

Looking or Hiding? “At 18 our convictions are hills from which we look. At 45 they are caves in which we hide.” – F Scott Fitzgerald How many Abrahamists, by the time they reach 45, are hiding behind their beliefs rather than actually believing in them? It’s easy to radicalise a 17year old; almost impossible to do it to a 45-year old.

Power Trip The Abrahamic God is on the ultimate power trip. The Old World Order see themselves as Gods too and are on exactly the same power trip. Serial killers and psychopaths are always on a power trip. Always watch out for those who are intoxicated by power over others.

Martyrdom Propaganda is so powerful that it can make people give up their lives for it. The Koran is nothing but preposterous propaganda and yet the hold it exerts on some impressionable minds is enough to make them seek to martyr themselves. Three thousand Americans (the victims of 9/11) would be alive today if nineteen Muslim suicide hijackers hadn’t swallowed the toxic propaganda of Islam. Yet there are some – the American “Truth” Movement – who deny that Muslims carried out 9/11 and instead sell their own Mythos, their own idiotic and deranged propaganda, that their own government carried out 9/11 as an “inside job”, a “false flag” attack. These people didn’t suddenly believe that their government was engaged in a murderous conspiracy against them. They always hated their

government, and had been brainwashed to do so by the propaganda fed to them by American right wing extremists (“patriots” and anarcho-capitalist libertarians). Their loathing of their government blinded them to any consideration that 9/11 really was perpetrated by Muslims. We are all soldiers or non-combatants in a vast, global propaganda war. How you approach life depends on what propaganda you’re buying. What you believe is what you want to believe, not what is true. The “Truth” Movement want to overthrow the American government, so the truth that the Muslims were responsible for 9/11 is of no use or interest to them. Propaganda and its success are absolutely tied to what people hope for and desire, and what serves their interests. Everywhere, people are believing their own propaganda, and are fully receptive to any propaganda that suits their ends. Such is the nature of the Mythos World we live in. Or should we say Propaganda World? Whose propaganda are you buying today?

The Democratic Mythos “Democracy is a device that ensures we shall be governed no better than we deserve.” – George Bernard Shaw And we apparently deserve the worst.

The Stock Market The stock market is full of rampers (bulls) bigging up shares, and derampers (bears) talking them down. And to think that the stock market is the vehicle that determines the economic health of the world. The stock market is just another arena for the global propaganda war.

Socialism versus Capitalism Socialism is the political and economic system for society, for the social body, for the people, for the General Will. Capitalism is the political and economic system for the elite, for the rich, for those with money and assets (capital), for the Particular Will. “Social capitalism” makes the people the capitalists – those with the money and the assets – via the Commonwealth. No individual owns anything in perpetuity. The collective – all of the people – owns everything. The

Commonwealth is managed within the context of a Meritocratic Republic by the most expert and wise of the people. “Social capitalism” is socialism that invokes capitalist markets, competition, choice, small businesses, and so on. It rejects capitalist rigged markets, cronyism, nepotism, privilege, inheritance, casino banking, predatory capitalism, international finance, capitalist globalisation, capitalism banking (run by private individuals for their own benefit), capitalist stock markets (run by elites rather than the people), the capitalist super rich, global corporations and multinationals in near-monopoly positions, and so on.

***** Socialism is about society, the social good, the people. Capitalism is about capital (wealth) owned by the elite, and not by the people. It’s not for the people but for the masters (elite), who enslave everyone else. Socialism is about a planned, rational economy. Capitalism is about an unplanned, irrational “invisible hand” that miraculously provides the best world (according to its supporters). Social capitalism is planned, rational capitalism designed for the benefit of all, and with the Commonwealth, rather than private elites, owning all of the capital.

The Four-Fold Lie Sin: An immoral act that transgresses against divine law. Faith: Strong belief in God or in the doctrines of a religion, based on spiritual apprehension and revelation rather than proof. Grace: the free and unmerited favour of God. Love: an intense, deep and often romantic feeling of deep affection.

The Financial Crash of 2008 Why did it happen? Because all the people running the system thought in the same way and were benefitting in the same way. Even for those who suspected disaster was imminent, there was no incentive to speak out or change anything. Whistleblowers never prosper. Infidels never prosper. Apostates never prosper. Heretics never prosper.

Any system that does not give a voice to madmen, hermits, heretics, dreamers, rebels, freethinkers, critics and skeptics is doomed.

Gandalf If you go along to a Christian church and listen to a Christian priest, vicar, pastor or reverend delivering a sermon, you will never hear any critique or philosophical analysis of Christianity and its doctrines, you will never hear science or mathematics. All you will hear are stories and interpretations of stories. If the Bible were simply replaced with Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings, would the Christian sermons change in the slightest? Every reference to “Jesus” could be replaced with references to “Gandalf”, another magician, with no loss of meaning. “Gandalf loves you.”; “Gandalf died for you.”; “Gandalf saved you.” We could also use JK Rowling’s Harry Potter series. The point is that Christianity is all about feelings and stories. It has nothing to do with truth and reason, which is why truth and reason never feature in any sermons. If Christianity were true and rational it would seek to truly and rationally address the avalanche of criticism and skepticism launched against it, but it never does. It “answers” mathematics, science, philosophical and skeptical Biblical scholarship with the same old discredited stories. Christianity is a kind of literary appreciation society, a global book club devoted to just one book – the Bible. It’s about time it learned literary criticism and started offering negative reviews and analysis of its chosen book rather than never-ending gushing praise and refusal to find any faults. Even better, Christians should learn science, philosophy and mathematics. Of course, Christianity is not about reason, only about comforting stories. Which is exactly why The Lord of the Rings would serve just as well. All Christians could sing Elvish hymns to Gandalf, and be as happy clappy as ever. What’s not to like?

***** Tolkien’s mother was a convert to Catholicism and, according to Tolkien himself was “persecuted” by her Baptist family for her choice, and denied financial assistance. He regarded her as a martyr and he himself remained

true to the Catholic faith for the rest of his life. He described The Lord of the Rings as a “fundamentally religious and Catholic work.” That being the case, why not simply replace Catholicism with The Lord of the Rings? You can get the flavour, meaning and message of Catholicism without the idiot Jesus Christ and the baffling nonsense of the Trinity. Of course, Tolkien was deluding himself. The Lord of the Rings is pure paganism and reflects an Anglo-Saxon and Norse worldview, with many elements of ancient mythologies too. So, it communicates all of the benefits of Catholicism without any of the drawbacks.

Superhero Evolution All superheroes ultimately evolve into Jesus Christ. They all become the Messiah, the “Saviour” of the world.

“Hard Working” Families? Politicians always pitch their message at “hard working” families. Where are these mythical beings? The only families on regular view are lazy, stupid, greedy, selfish, inept jokes of human beings who are devoted to getting paid the maximum amount of money for the minimum amount of effort and would never think of doing any hard work. Most can’t wait to get out of the workplace. Even worse, most of them don’t even like their own families, and certainly haven’t done a good job raising their children. It’s actually impossible to imagine any democratic politician telling the truth about the family. After all, they don’t want to insult their voters. Moreover, they themselves are “family” people, and we all know what that means.

The Question of Murder We are told that the Nazis murdered six million Jews. When the Jewish God exterminated the whole human race bar Noah and his family, was that murder? The Jewish God and the Jewish people spoke of “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth”. The Bible talks of those who live by the sword dying by the sword. What about those who live by extermination? If you get on your knees to worship a God of Extermination, do you really expect the world to weep for you? Who weeps for those exterminated by your God?

A little honesty, please. For once. No one should ever forget that the worst idea in the whole of human history bar none is that of the Jewish monotheistic God, the two miscarriages of which were Jesus Christ (Christianity) and Allah (Islam). These are the three most evil religions in world history, for which there can never be enough condemnation and revulsion. The Abrahamists have knelt to Satan and called him God. They have brought the abattoir to our world, the bloody slaughterbench of false gods, mercilessly persecuting and murdering the righteous.

***** When the British tried to block Jewish emigration to Palestine, the Jews held protest marches and raised banners saying, “The Bible is our Mandate, England cannot abolish it.” But anyone can abolish the Jewish Bible. The Nazis almost did. Where was the Jewish God during the Holocaust? The Jewish Bible is a document of infinite insanity that bears no resemblance to reality and describes a “God” that is the inverse of any benevolent, moral force.

***** If you were alive in the days of Noah’s Ark, you would have been one of the victims of the Jewish God, exterminated along with all the rest. Your crime? You did not bow to the tyrant, to the monster. If he had the chance, he’d murder you now too. He’s your lethal enemy for all time.

Holy War; Holy Murder One implicit commandment has always got the blood flowing faster in the religiously minded: Murder Thy Enemies. The ultimate validation of one’s religious beliefs is expressed through the slaughter of the infidel, the disgusting unbelievers. Young Muslim men throughout the world can think of nothing more glorious than massacring the enemies of Islam and then being ecstatically martyred, going straight to the highest heaven, with all the dusky virgins and wine. And that’s why Islam should be banned in all civilised nations.

It’s impossible to find a better way for incentivising extreme, deadly violence than Islam. Islam is in fact constructed around the concept of jihad (holy war) and martyrdom. Throughout Christendom, Islam was always known as the “religion of the sword”. Mohammed himself was an active jihadist – unlike every other “prophet” in history, none of whom ever led armies. Mohammed acted far more like a king or Fuehrer than a man of religion. He was a brutal dictator, an Arab Hitler, and Islam is simply the Arab Nazi Party that promotes the idea that it’s the “Master Race”, blessed by Allah himself. The Islamic Hajj is simply an annual Nuremberg rally. All Muslims are Nazis. That’s a fact.

The Fantasy Is the Jewish Bible a tale of the encounters of men with their God, or a tale of the fantasy of encounters of men with their God? Did the Jews simply project their longing to be a special people (the “Chosen People”) onto the world and thus place insanity at the heart of religion? Were the Jews the first religious lunatics, and did they consign us all to the cosmic madhouse?

The Party of the Rich Every nation has a political party of the rich, a party of the elite. What is extraordinary is that such parties receive heavy support from the poor and the non-elite. Why? Because many people can’t imagine being anything other than slaves, but they also have a dream (an “American dream”) that one day they or their children will join the elite.

***** The party of the rich are resolutely negative libertarian. They don’t want the State dictating to them. They will dictate to the State, thank you very much. However, when it comes to the “underclass” then the elite suddenly become positive libertarians, but in a very ugly way. They think they can cajole and bully the poor and weak into playing the rich man’s game. They don’t give the poor and weak a proper education and proper chance. They terrify them by cutting their benefits and making them take soul-destroying jobs where they have to work all hours for a pittance (massively boosting the profits of the rich). What a bunch of hypocrites and thugs.

Verify

“Trust but verify.” – Ronald Reagan What?! Reagan was a Christian – a believer. Since when did Christians ever verify anything?

Insanity Mentally ill people kill far fewer people each year than religiously-inspired terrorists who are regarded as sane. Isn’t religious belief the most dangerous and insane thing of all? Hasn’t that been proved relentlessly by history? We’d be much safer living next door to mental patients, with all the believers locked up in mental asylums, rather than the other way around.

The Hard Choices All Muslims believe that their prophet Mohammed literally encountered the Angel Gabriel in person or in visions, and was presented with the Word of God (the Koran). All non-Muslims do not believe this. So, for nonMuslims, what is Mohammed? Here are some of the choices: 1) Mohammed was an absolute liar and just made it all up. 2) Mohammed was a fantasist and fantasised it all. 3) Mohammed was a narcissist and believed he must have a special relationship with Allah. 4) Mohammed was a full-blown psychotic. 5) Mohammed was a schizophrenic, manic-depressive or suffering from some such mental disorder. 6) Mohammed was bicameral, and had the mind of ancient, pre-conscious humanity, hence he seemed very unworldly and godly to his normal, conscious peers. 7) Mohammed was being manipulated by others who played mind-games with him and used him as a puppet. 8) Mohammed was an expert psychologist and politician who knew he must devise some extraordinary Mythos to change his nation and people. So, which is it? No matter what anyone says about Mohammed, he certainly changed the world and, for a few centuries, he made the Arabs much more

powerful than they would have been otherwise. All of these advantages have now vanished since Islam is wholly incompatible with the modern world. Arabs have become utterly backward in relation to the West. They now need a new Mohammed whose task, ironically, is to completely overthrow the message of the first Mohammed.

The Hater of Britain? Ralph Miliband, the dead father of Ed Miliband, current leader of Britain’s Labour Party, was a Marxist academic and, as would be expected of a Marxist, he denounced the British monarchy, the British education system (primarily Eton and Harrow private schools and Oxford and Cambridge universities), the British system of privileged clubs, societies and selfserving Freemasonry, the British class system and all of its offensive and damaging privilege, British nationalism and imperialism, the British Parliament with its House of Lords and its absurd “democracy”, the Church of England, the British establishment, the “old boy network”, the “old school tie” and the British army, led by the privileged elite, as the upholder of this whole rancid edifice. Miliband, rightly, said that these were all responsible for establishing a false consciousness in the people, which made them sign up to and welcome a system that oppressed them. The Daily Mail, a far right British newspaper, described Ralph Miliband as a man who hated Britain, with the implication that Ed Miliband, as his loyal son, was also a hater of Britain, hence must never become British prime minister. This is exactly how the right wing operates. They define right wing institutions as the essence of a nation, so that anyone who opposes them is “obviously” a hater of the nation, and an enemy of all patriots. The fact is that any British person who does not oppose the British monarchy and elitist private education system is a true hater of Britain, and utterly opposed to the interests of the British people.

***** Ralph Miliband was a Jewish refugee who fled to Britain as a teenager before the start of WWII, and joined the British navy and fought for his adopted country. Hardly a man who hated his new nation. Wikipedia says, “Miliband was born in Belgium, to working class Polish Jewish immigrants. He fled to Britain in 1940 with his father, to avoid

persecution when Nazi Germany invaded Belgium. Learning to speak English, and enrolling at the London School of Economics, he became involved in left-wing politics, and made a personal commitment to the cause of socialism at the grave of Karl Marx. After serving in the Royal Navy during the Second World War, he gained British citizenship and settled in London in 1946.” There’s all the difference in the world between hating the right wing institutions of Britain and hating the British people. The right wing have always conflated the two as part of their propaganda. The greatest tragedy of this case is that Ed Miliband is now an establishment figure obeying the right wing agenda and without a Marxist bone in his body. He’s a reflection of the total victory of the elite. Ralph Miliband, the father, would have been a far superior leader of the Labour Party than Ed Miliband, the son. In fact, the son is an insult to the memory of his father. The father’s analysis of Britain was 100% correct, although his Marxist solution was wrong. It is Meritocracy, not Marxism, that will topple the elite.

***** “The Englishman is a rabid nationalist. They are perhaps the most nationalist people in the world . . . you sometimes want them almost to lose [the war] to show them how things are. They have the greatest contempt for the Continent. To lose their empire would be the worst possible humiliation.” Ralph Miliband (aged 17) Ralph Miliband described the Labour Party victory of 1945 as “the country’s capture from its traditional rulers”. “We want this party [the Labour Party] to state that it stands unequivocally behind the social ownership and control of the means of production, distribution and exchange. We are a Socialist party engaged on a great adventure.’ – Ralph Miliband “Class success means the ability of a dominant class to maintain its position in society, and to contain and subdue any challenge to its power and privileges. Elite recruitment in these ... societies has a distinctly hereditary character. Access from the working classes into the middle and upper

classes is generally low. This is what has happened in Britain.” – Ralph Miliband “Eton and Harrow, Oxford and Cambridge, the great Clubs, the Times, the Church, the Army, the respectable Sunday papers ... It also means the values ... of the ruling orders, keep the workers in their place, strengthen the House of Lords, maintain social hierarchies, God save the Queen, equality is bunk, democracy is dangerous, etc. ... Also respectability, good taste, don’t rock the boat, there will always be an England, foreigners, Jews, natives etc. are all right in their place, and their place is outside ...” – Ralph Miliband “I won’t write about the fucking Falklands now. It’s a most depressing and bitter business and it seems to have turned Thatcher into a major political figure. ... I mean that her brand of Toryism may now come to predominate. The Falklands has served her well ... if she is returned at the next election England will look a very different country than even in 1979.” – Ralph Miliband “I have not, from that day to this, departed from the view that this was the right cause and that I belonged to it. I see no reason for the resigned acceptance of defeat. On the contrary, what it requires is to begin preparing the ground for the coming into being of such an alternative.” – Ralph Miliband All of that is as true now as it was when Ralph Miliband expressed these opinions. The Daily Mail, a disgusting rag for morons, said that Miliband’s legacy was “evil”. In fact, it’s The Daily Mail that’s evil and hates Britain and the British people.

Truth Infection BS: “Truth becomes infected by the herd.” Is it true? Does the common herd actually corrupt, contaminate and infect the truth with lies and irrationality? Is the herd a collective truth destroyer, a truth Death Star?

The Centre Ground

In the modern political age, all mainstream political parties have converged on the centre ground, the middle position of consensus, compromise and the status quo. Nothing significant ever changes. The differences between the parties are at the level of nuance and detail, nothing else. None of them propose a new “big picture”, a new vision of society. The centre is where the herd live, the sheeple, the last men, the neutral, the Ignavi, those with nothing to say, the conformists, the group thinkers. Don’t be one of them.

Political Smiles Weak politicians, political puppets always smile and wave at their audience. Strong politicians, those who actually count, never smile and wave at their audience. They are there to lead, not to relate and sympathise.

The Elite Lie The elite always say they stand for aspiration and opportunity. Of course, in reality, only they are allowed to have opportunities and only their aspirations are realistic, i.e. can ever come to pass. The people don’t have an American Dream. They live, instead, in an American Dream World, an absurd fantasy, a Disney World of make believe and self delusion.

Strange World We have noticed that many people who self-identify as “Illuminists” and who claim to be influenced by us also subscribe to, and endorse, Facebook pages for which we have absolute contempt. We are pro-State and proGovernment, provided they are meritocratic and not working for the elite, and we are totally opposed to anarchism, libertarianism and anti-Statism. We reject you completely if you support anti-meritocratic positions such as anarchy, libertarianism, free-market capitalism, liberalism, communism, democracy, privilege, inheritance, nepotism, cronyism or indeed anything other than out and out Pythagorean-Platonic rational meritocracy. Go somewhere else if you disagree with us. We have no time for you and no interest in you. You cannot ride two horses at once. Make your choice and make your stand. You are either with us or against us. We can’t abide Last Men and Ignavi who try to follow every wind and commit themselves to no cause.

Shutdown The 2013 shutting down of the American government because of Congress’s failure to agree new budget proves that the American right wing are now outright anarchists seeking to overthrow government entirely. They do not want any Federal or public spending. In America, the State is seen as inherently left wing and so the right wingers now wish to abolish it entirely. This is the inevitable product of anarcho-capitalist libertarianism and right wing conspiracy theories about the Illuminati. America is no longer governable and its internal contradictions will destroy it. America’s days as a world superpower are over. A libertarian anarchy – which is what America is turning into – can never have any positive influence on the world. Anarchists say that government is the problem and not the solution. In fact, the precise opposite is true. Government – proper, strong, meritocratic government that truly expresses the General Will and is not in the pockets of the rich elite – is the solution and the anarchists and libertarians are the central problem. Government must deal with all these fanatics who stand against the people and the General Will in favour of their own selfish, irrational, particular wills. There must be a final reckoning with the anarchists and conspiracy theorists. There can be no rational, meritocratic Platonic Republic with such people.

***** “It’s time to reject government and replace it with proper management. When you engage a management company to run your country for the people, they have to be transparent with their audited accounts and also make sure those people who run the management are really qualified to perform their duties. If they are not doing the job properly with the right solution, their company will be fired immediately and held accountable for any frauds and crimes committed against the people who are their real bosses!” – An anarchist Here we see the fallacy of anarchism. The anarchists reject government and then say it should be replaced by “management”, which is simply a form of government, but lacking any vision and political agenda. The above

statement could simply be changed to say, “Why don’t governments behave more like capitalist corporations?” And thus we see how “left wing” anarchists are really just the same as right wing anarchists and want the world to be run by unelected, unaccountable corporations, boards of directors, mangers and markets. That, in fact, is the world we already have. There are no true governments in the world, just poodle managers and puppets doing what the rich, the banks and the corporations want them to do. The world isn’t suffering from over government but from the exact opposite: under government. We live in a negative liberty world that despises and fears positive liberty. The last two positive liberty systems were Nazism and Communism. With these, the State was all-powerful and the rich were either eliminated or in the pockets of the government. Nazism and Communism both failed and had many appalling features, but that doesn’t mean that the State and positive liberty are intrinsically wrong. Rather, we haven’t yet found the proper positive liberty State that solves all of our problems and is fair and just to all. The solution now exists – the Meritocratic Republic – but is yet to be implemented. Its central enemies are the anarchists, libertarians, conspiracy theorists, anti-Statists, free-market capitalists, the super rich, the elite dynastic families, the forces of privilege, cronyism, nepotism and inheritance, the religious fundamentalists – all the forces of reaction, the status quo, of counter-revolution, of negative liberty, of conservatism and the old ways of doing things ... of the same old elites. It’s time for the New World Order: rule by the people; the expression of the General Will. It’s time for positive liberty and the transformation of humanity into gods. Only the State can deliver higher human evolution. Only it has the resources and the will. Imagine if the Nazis had not been committed to some absurd notion of the “Master Race” but had instead been devoted to the optimisation of the whole human race through the overthrow of capitalism and Abrahamism and the promotion of global merit – getting the most from each and every citizen, maximising everyone’s talents and contribution. Humanity can achieve anything if it commits itself to Meritocracy. Hell mend those morons and selfish individuals that stand in our way. They are the problem and we are the solution.

Self-Interest What do you say? 1) “What’s in it for me?” – capitalism. 2) “What’s in it for us?” – socialism.

Rights What are the differences between civil, legal, natural, human and divine rights? This turns out to be a fantastically difficult question because of people’s religious and political beliefs. Let’s attempt a few potential definitions: 1) Civil Rights: The rights of citizens to political and social freedom and equality. The rights belonging to an individual by virtue of citizenship, including civil liberties, due process, equal protection under the law, and freedom from discrimination. 2) Legal Rights: The rights bestowed by a given legal system. 3) Natural Rights: The rights that are not contingent upon the laws, customs, or beliefs of any particular culture or government, and therefore are universal and inalienable. They are therefore “universal” rights. English philosopher John Locke defined them in relation to “life, liberty and property.” Thomas Jefferson asserted “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” They are said to “inalienable”, given to every person and which do not have to be earned. They are rights that are believed to belong justifiably to every person. 4) Human Rights: The basic rights and freedoms to which all humans are entitled, often held to include the right to life and liberty, freedom of thought and expression, and equality before the law. 5) Divine Rights: The proposed rights of God over humanity. The rights which allegedly come directly from a god. Monarchs who claim to rule by “divine right” assert that they are appointed and anointed by God and answer only to God. Religious believers who live in a theocracy accord “divine rights” infinitely higher value than any other “rights” – which are not rights at all if they are deemed to conflict with divine rights. Thus many

Muslims truly acknowledge only Sharia Law, which defines rights only in relation to the Koran. So, there’s a strong overlap between civil, legal and human rights. “Natural” rights can be highly problematic because many people claim they are conferred by “God”, which makes them neither civil, legal nor human, even though they closely resemble “human” rights and many people would draw no distinction between them. The Declaration of Independence says that a “Creator” (undefined) endows people with “certain unalienable Rights.” What’s for sure is that he certainly doesn’t enforce them or do anything at all to ensure they are upheld. The Jews allegedly have a solemn, sacred and unbreakable Covenant with God, yet the Holocaust happened where the Jews had all “rights” removed from them, and it would have been absurd for a Jew to ask a Nazi for “rights”. For Christian Fundamentalists, “natural” rights are God-given. However, this is unacceptable and meaningless to most people who do not believe in the Christian God. With the Enlightenment and the French Revolution, “natural” (“God-given”) rights were displaced by human (“Man-given”) rights. The French Revolutionaries proclaimed The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (or The Declaration of Human and Civil Rights). As with natural rights, these are considered universal and inalienable. However, it’s humanity not God that defines, upholds and enforces them. Such rights transcend all governments – they are all expected to acknowledge them, regardless of their religious and political ideologies. Natural rights are thought not to change over time (if they come from God), whereas the definition of human rights can regularly change as societies change and reflect new values. Human rights might reflect “economic and social rights”, which have nothing to do with “God”. However, consider John Locke’s proposal that the “right to property” is a universal right. Well, who says? That’s merely his opinion. A world without property existed long before John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau even argued that property was the root of all evil. Plainly, then, universal rights are not as universal as is claimed. Jefferson replaced “property” with “the pursuit of happiness”. Well, this sounds fabulous, but what is happiness? If capitalism allows the rich elite to pursue happiness but inflicts misery on everyone else, is that acceptable or unacceptable? America proclaimed “liberty” an unalienable right and then instantly

alienated African slaves from it, while they allowed the slave owners to pursue their capitalist “happiness”. The whole thing was and is a spectacular muddle. In Illuminism, there are no natural rights, no human rights, no divine rights and no civil rights. There are only legal rights. They are defined and enforced by the State and set out in its legal Constitution, its Social Contract with the people, which every citizen must sign, or leave the State. “Natural” rights, such as they are, are those that prevail in the jungle where anything goes – where there are no laws, order, civilisation, society, governments or gods and simply “might is right”. The strong can do what they like. Nature has conferred strength on them, and they can do what they want with it.

Property It was catastrophic for John Locke to define “property” as a universal right. This became the central pillar of free-market capitalism, where private property and assets are deem sacred. A Meritocratic Republic will apply 100% inheritance tax and transfer all private assets of the deceased to the Commonwealth. The dead have no rights at all over the living. The dead cannot transfer anything to anyone else.

The Problem of Law The law is fundamentally absurd because it avoids the issue of inherent conflict. For example, it says that civil and human rights must be respected and then it includes in human rights the right to practise one’s religion freely. However, the free practise of religion involves parents indoctrinating their children with ancient, irrational superstitions and, in the case of male and female circumcision, physical mutilation of their children. Now a child’s civil and human rights should guarantee that they are not victims of either mental abuse (brainwashing) or physical abuse (circumcision). So we see that it’s ridiculous to classify religion amongst human rights since religion is the foremost enemy of human rights. Any law truly based on human and civil and rights would automatically ban all religious brainwashing and ritual mutilation, hence would destroy religion overnight. It’s said to be sexist, racist and an abuse of civil and human rights if a white man complains about Muslim women wearing the veil or burqa.

However, why is it not sexist, racist and an abuse of civil and human rights if a Muslim woman puts on a veil the moment a white man enters the room, thus treating him like a freak, monster, infidel and would-be rapist. You can’t have it both ways. Society – totally hypocritical, irrational and inconsistent – tries to do exactly that and fudges everything. Everything is an unacceptable, muddled compromise. Well, in a rational Meritocracy this will all come to an end. Civil and human rights will be precisely defined and anything inconsistent with them will be illegal – and above all that means most mainstream religious beliefs, attitudes, customs and practices.

***** Of course, the religious will refer to “natural” and “God-given” rights to resist any such attempts to ban their wicked ways. This sums up the whole problem with “rights”.

***** Right wingers always refer to natural and God-given rights. What they are determined to do is exclude government and define a set of rights wholly favourable to them with which, so they claim, government and the State have no right to interfere. Above all, they want to protect religion, the family and property, and they disingenuously link this with “patriotism” as they yell, “Faith, Family and Flag. Left wingers refer to civil, human and legal rights. Natural and God-given rights are associated with negative libertarians, and civil, human and legal rights with positive libertarians. Negative libertarians see natural and God-given rights as a bulwark against positive liberty intervention. While America ought to rewrite its Constitution to reflect the world of the 21st century, right wingers treat the Constitution as holy writ that must never be changed. In other words, the Constitution is now taken to be treated as a sacred text that enumerates natural and God-given rights that must never be changed or challenged, when in fact the Constitution was just a manmade document written at a certain time and reflecting prevailing attitudes.

*****

There is no evidence in the modern world of any “God” interfering with human affairs. There are no “God-given” rights. “God” did not enter into any Covenant or Contract with any individual or group. God did not sign any documents. He can play no part at all in any legal system. Religion should be 100% removed from law and rights.

What Capitalism Says “Get it now.” “Don’t delay.” “Don’t miss out.” “All your friends are doing it.” “Only losers do not have product X.” “You’re not a loser, are you?” “Without X, you will lose your friends.” “With X, you will be more successful.” “With X, your status will be higher.” “With X, you will be more popular.” “With X, you will get more and better sexual partners.” “With X, you will be more like the celebrity gods.” Is there any industry more sinister and more geared to shameless propaganda than capitalist advertising? Almost all “free” internet businesses rely on an “advertising model”. Therefore, capitalist advertising controls the internet and thus us. Imagine the internet with all capitalist advertising banned? Shouldn’t that be what we are aiming for?

Irrationalism Abrahamists suffer from emotional irrationalism. Followers of Eastern religion suffer from intuitive irrationalism. Scientists suffer from sensory irrationalism.

Only thinkers are rational, and they accept that the universe is fundamentally intelligible, not sensible or emotional or purely intuitive.

The Cosmic Imaginary Friend “God” is simply a vulnerable person’s ultimate imaginary friend. When a person says she will “pray for you”, what she means is that she will pray to herself (or rather to the imaginary friend in her mind). In fact, “God” is the ultimate imaginary, idealised father figure. Most people, in their heart of hearts, are simply children looking for a perfect, cosmic father to make everything OK for them. An adult has no need of God, just as an adult has outgrown his parents and can make his own way in life and stand on his own two feet.

The Asymmetric Dialectic If we talk of a thesis of positive liberty and an antithesis of negative liberty, most people might suspect that the synthesis would be roughly 50/50 of each. That’s not the way the dialectic works. Most of the time, the thesis is enormously superior to the antithesis, or vice versa, i.e. we’re dealing with an asymmetric system. The synthesis typically involves taking a small amount of the minor component to smooth out the major component. The 80/20 rule is probably a good guide. To put it another way, in any dialectical system, one side is usually 80% right and their opponents 80% wrong, but those in the wrong usually have a 20% case worth arguing, and the right side should incorporate this 20% and ditch the least effective 20% of their own case. So, in the dialectical contest between the left and right wing, the answer is not the centre. Rather, it’s the left wing position amended by a 20% right wing ingredient. The left wing position is about the collective and the right wing about the individual. We need a system 80% devoted to the General Will but with 20% that gratifies individuals and their particular wills. The 80/20 rule is the proper rule for dialectical “compromise”, not 50/50.

Marriage Since marriage is at the heart of the legal concept of the “family”, of family inheritance, and of the “right” of parents to religiously brainwash and mutilate their children, marriage can play no official part in a Meritocracy.

Marriage will not be recognised in a Meritocratic State. People can enter into whatever consensual private arrangements they like, but they will have no legal significance. Each citizen enters into an individual social contract with the Meritocratic State, not with their parents or family. The State will protect children from religious brainwashing and mutilation. The State will abolish inheritance that allows the creation of dynastic elites. The State will eliminate the privilege, nepotism and cronyism that defines the family way of doing things. The “Mafia” State – rule by the “family” – will be replaced by the Meritocratic State – rule by humanity’s smartest and best, for the good of all rather than solely their own good. The power of the family must be smashed once and for all. Family subverts the relationship between the individual and the State (the collective, the community, the Commonwealth) and promotes, anti-Statism, anarchy, libertarianism, negative liberty, free-market capitalism, individualism, and rule by dynastic families such as the English “royal” family and the Rothschilds. The family has its own agenda – its own private good, regardless of others – and that’s completely incompatible with a world of fairness, justice, equal opportunities and community. The family is at the root of all right wing ideologies, and community at the heart of all left wing ideologies. Free-market capitalism is rule by elite families. It’s particular families that hold the capital, and thus have power over all the rest of us. Who elected them? Who appointed them? To whom are they accountable? Who wants them? They are there purely because the “democratic” State has refused to confront the issue of the power, wealth and influence of unelected and unaccountable privileged families. There must be a final reckoning between the family and the State, between right and left wing politics. The family is the viral vector for the transmission of the deadly disease of mainstream religion, especially Abrahamism. Religion and ignorance will persist as long as the family holds power. We can have a new human race only when we transcend the family, when the family is prevented from brainwashing children, from abusing children, from making children stupid,

ignorant and superstitious, from bringing them up badly and wasting their potential. It’s time for Plato’s Republic of Reason.

The Hieratic Conspiracy Hieratic: “Of or concerning priests”. The priest caste are the middlemen between men and gods. As the selfproclaimed representatives of the gods’ will on earth, they confer huge power on themselves. Why did Catholic priests get away with so much child abuse? Because they claimed to be wrapped in the cloaks of God, so who would believe that they were evil paedophiles? All priests are evil. All rabbis, imams, popes, vicars, pastors, reverends and gurus are evil. That’s a fact.

***** The priest caste manifests itself in many other ways. All middlemen are effectively priests. Agents are the middlemen between corporations and the “talent” (the gods). They seek to present their clients as divinities and chosen ones for whom only the very highest salaries will suffice. The same goes for recruitment “headhunters”. Their clients are always “gods” (allegedly).

Social Narcissism The world is always forcing its propaganda on you. Everyone is “selling” you something. At the very least, they’re selling you their story, their version of events, their view of the world, the way they want things to be. You’re at it too, of course. Facebook and Twitter are not social networking platforms. Rather, they’re personal propaganda vehicles, which is why they’re so successful and why people lavish so much time on them. They’re cyber self-portraits, and people will endlessly keep airbrushing them, trying to perfect them. What’s the secret of making money? Pander to people’s narcissism. Make it all about them – their favourite subject. We’re saturated with propaganda. We’re bombarded with religious, political, economic, social and psychological propaganda. The media and

advertising industries have no other function than to mass produce propaganda. Where is the truth in all this? What and whom can you trust? What propaganda techniques should you be looking out for? How can you protect yourself? This book is the gospel of anti-propaganda. This is the exposé of all the propagandists out to manipulate and exploit you. By the time you’ve finished this, you’ll know exactly what to believe. It’s a short list! “In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” – George Orwell In a time of universal propaganda, knowing what the truth is in the first place is revolutionary. Learn the truth. Join the Revolution. Be a heroic soldier in the war of the Second and Final Enlightenment: the war to end Abrahamism, Karmism and free-market capitalism once and for all, the war to place humanity’s irrational past behind it and advance into the glorious, divine future.

Dogs and Politicians “Journalism is to politician as dog is to lamp-post.” – H.L. Mencken In fact, journalism is to politician as starving Rottweiler is to defenceless baby. The 24/7 media machine – run by super rich oligarchs and media barons is far more powerful than any politicians. The media sets the political weather at all times and even decides who gets elected. The media machine is enormously bigger and richer than any political administration and has far more resources and employees. Add in the lobbying industry, pressure groups, anarchists, libertarians and conspiracy theorists and what you have is a tiny political elite assailed on all sides by synthetic “public opinion” (manufactured by all the propaganda groups that want the government to do their bidding). In such a system, the General Will is never expressed, only the particular wills of the many different factions competing to get their own way. The multi-party political system also obeys the doctrine of satisfying the particular will (of the party) rather than the General Will of the people. We live in a negative liberty political system designed to subvert and thwart the General Will and to prevent governments from actually doing

anything (leaving true power with the “markets”, i.e. the banks, corporatocracy and super rich). Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union and Communist China were far more likely to get things done than any democracy since they were not subject to competing particular wills, but only applied one will (that of the leader or the one, totalitarian party). People have to think extremely carefully about topics such as the “free press” (meaning the freedom of rich media moguls to spread their toxic propaganda and thus control the political system in order to serve their own ends and agenda). Do you want effective positive liberty government controlled by meritocrats, or ineffective negative liberty government controlled by media billionaires out to grab more and power and wealth for themselves?

Neutrality In the public space, neutrality is the fairest, most just and rational position. The less neutral your behaviour is in the public space, the more you are bullying others to accept your private tastes. Keep your tastes for your private space. If you bring them to the public space and impose them on others, expect trouble.

Bell Ringing Is it acceptable for cyclists on a public pavement to ring their bell at pedestrians? What does such a gesture mean? A cyclist will tell himself that he’s politely alerting pedestrians to his presence. But of course that’s not what he’s doing. He’s actually rudely ordering them to fuck off out of his way. What he’s saying is, “I’m more important than you. I’m elite and you’re a nobody. Why should you be allowed to slow me up?” He’s telling you that you’re a second class citizen. That’s what bell ringing means. It doesn’t matter what people pretend it means. That’s what it actually means. It’s an act of aggression and it should be met aggressively. There is never any justification for a cyclist to ring a bell at a pedestrian. The cyclist has no right of way. No law says that you must let him pass. He has no superior status. Just as a fast car has no right to get past a slow tractor on a narrow road, so no cyclist ever has any right to get past a pedestrian. Why don’t cyclists simply dismount rather than ring their bell, and remount when they get opportunity? But of course that would

inconvenience them and, being such elite citizens, they do no not countenance being inconvenienced. So, you see, even something as seemingly innocent as the ringing of a bell is immensely political and aggressive, reflecting a whole set of tacit beliefs and attitudes, and surrounded by a “complicitous silence”. No pedestrian should ever allow a cyclist to ring a bell and get past him. If you permit it, you have made yourself a second-class citizen. People simply need to ring a bell at you, and, like one of Pavlov’s dogs, you humiliate yourself by letting the bully past without a word of defiance. Don’t let anyone walk over you. Always resist. The world is short of retaliators. All bullying behaviour in the public space should be met with retaliation. That’s the only way the bullies will ever be stopped. That’s the only way they will learn their lesson. Anyone who is not behaving neutrally in the public space is a bully and their behaviour is not acceptable. The law should always state exactly who is in the right and who is in the wrong, and the law should never be on the side of the unneutral bully demanding to get his own way and even having the impudence and arrogance to ring a hawkish bell at other people. What’s the world coming to when one human being thinks he has the right to ring a bell at another human being to make him clear out of his way?

Say Something What do you have to say for yourself? Do you have anything original to say? Anything worthwhile? Anything meaningful? Most people have nothing to say, and most of public discourse on the internet involves people saying nothing very loudly and obnoxiously.

Mad Testimony The mad aren’t allowed to testify since no one could place any trust in what they say. So why are Abrahamists allowed to testify? These people hold beliefs that are unquestionably insane. Abrahamists believe that if you hear a voice in your head calling itself “God”, you should obey its order to sacrifice your son – something utterly insane and utterly evil. Jews believe that Moses went up Mount Sinai and spoke to God, and carried down the two tablets of the Ten Commandments bearing God’s own writing – this is insane. Christians believe that Jesus’ dad was God, the

Creator of the universe, and that Jesus is also this same Creator – this is doubly insane! Muslims believe that Mohammed, an illiterate, went into a cave and encountered the Angel Gabriel who gave him a book to read (the Koran) and memorise – bonkers! Why is the testimony of the mad allowed to be heard just because people call themselves Abrahamists? Not a single word they say can be believed. Since they are prepared to believe anything, no matter how mad, so they are also willing to say anything on oath, no matter how false or mad. These people have no relationship at all with the truth.

The Question Who should rule – the people or the rich? This is the oldest question of politics, and it has never been properly resolved. In the modern day, we have the ultimate political lie, namely, that the people rule (democracy) when in fact it’s self-evident that the rich (unelected and accountable oligarchs) rule everything via corporations and banks. Getting the people truly in charge is the central purpose of meritocracy, and that means destroying the power of the rich, of the banks and corporations.

Patriotism To all American “patriots”... “Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.” – Dr Johnson These days, “patriot” means anarcho-capitalist libertarian who fanatically hates his own government and would fight against it. Hardly patriotic! American “patriots” are invariably extreme right wing anarchists, libertarians, capitalists, Christian fundamentalists and conspiracy theorists. They are amongst the most dangerous and evil people in the world. They are all enemies of the people.

The Simple Rule Anyone wearing religious garb, or religious symbols, in the public space is brainwashed and irrational. This is an incontestable fact. You should always avoid such people as if they were plague carriers (which is essentially what they are – carriers of the lethal virus of false religion).

The Simple Law Most of the legal and accounting professions are given over to the manipulation of loopholes and technicalities. They obey the letter of the law but never the spirit of the law. The law should thus have a second tier, designed to uphold the spirit of the law, and thus to overturn any decisions based on loopholes or technicalities. As soon as such a tier was inaugurated, 90% of lawyers and accountants would be out of job. They are there only to twist and pervert the law, to mock the spirit of the law. The last thing they do is uphold what the laws were intended to accomplish.

Mythos and Logos Explanations In the ancient world, explanations for natural phenomena were given in terms of myths concerning the gods. This approach has by no means vanished in the modern world. The vast majority of people still understand reality in terms of religious myths, gods, ancient holy texts and ancient prophet. They haven’t evolved at all. The modern world began with the philosophers of ancient Greece who attempted Logos rather than Mythos explanations, i.e. they used reason instead of faith and story. They relied on facts, evidence, proofs and rational arguments. The gods were subject to rules rather than making up the rules as they went along. In the modern world, only about ten percent of people subscribe to Logos and ninety percent are still in thrall to Mythos. Politics and economics are also treated in Mythos rather than Logos terms and tell infantile “stories” about the nature of reality and society. For example, government is frequently demonised as evil, wicked and contrary to God’s laws. Politics and economics are treated as extensions of religious discourse and religious notions of good and evil. In the past, political rulers (monarchs) were deemed to rule by “divine right”. In terms of free-market capitalism, we are told that an “invisible hand” benevolently steers the process. These are religious conceptions that have no place in a Logos world. Mythos understands reality in terms of stories. Therefore, human personalities are projected onto nature, and we find gods of rocks, of the wind, the seas, trees, mountains, lakes, and so on. All of these gods have

human personalities and exhibit human behaviour. Thus, a volcano erupts because its god has been enraged by some perceived insult and is now exploding with anger. The ultimate Mythos is that of the monotheistic Creator. A single god is now responsible for everything, and our single relationship with him is all-important. We can’t appeal to any other gods. Polytheistic pagans, if they offended one god, could ask other gods for help. This meant that no God became too important. With monotheism, one God is all there is and if you don’t do his bidding you’re well and truly fucked. Monotheism automatically breeds fanatics because it removes choice. You are either for “God” or against him and if the latter then you should be put to death (according to his supporters). This is the precise logic of monotheism. It’s about them and us, a binary conflict between the believers and the unbelievers. Polytheism breeds tolerance because no god is crucially important. Monotheism breeds insane extremism because God is now all-important. With polytheism, you have a right of appeal to other gods. With monotheism there are no appeals. All decisions are absolute and irrevocable. That’s why monotheism is the worst and most dangerous idea of all time. It’s a bloodbath concept, and we should not be surprised to find that its inventors – the Jews – were themselves subject to a bloodbath. That’s what happens when you are confronted by those who absolutely accept your binary logic, but call you the infidels rather than the believers. In Christians terms, all Jews are infidels since they rejected the “true God” Jesus Christ. Not only that, they killed the Christian God. They are the Christ killers – the ultimate enemies of God. Monotheism supports “appeals to authority”, with the supreme authority being God himself. The people who can best convince others that they speak for God become immensely powerful – just look at Mohammed. Polytheism lends itself to rationalism and merit rather than religious authority. Monotheism leads to the Inquisition, crusades, jihad and suicide bombing.

***** How can there be monarchs in the 21st century? It reveals how irrational most people are and how in thrall they are to Mythos that so many countries still have monarchs, and so many people are still interested in kings and queens, princes and princesses, and royal babies.

One of the reasons why Christianity is so popular is that it begins with the tale of a fairytale royal baby.

The Sixth Pillar of Islam Islam has five defining pillars – these constitute the “text” of Islam, its public face. Yet Islam also has an unspoken sixth pillar, its subtext (its hidden face), which is more important than all the rest put together. This is Jihad – holy war against the infidel. All Muslim terrorists devote themselves to the Sixth Pillar of Islam.

Greater Fool Theory “The greater fool theory (also called survivor investing) is the belief held by one who makes a questionable investment, with the assumption that they will be able to sell it later to ‘a greater fool’; in other words, buying something not because you believe that it is worth the price, but rather because you believe that you will be able to sell it to someone else at an even higher price.” – Wikipedia Isn’t our whole world run according to this theory? Isn’t is the basis of capitalism?

The Birth of Science When Thales, the first Greek philosopher, predicted the solar eclipse of 585 BCE, this was the birth of science, the birth of Logos. Any Mythos person would have said an eclipse was caused by a god of light who was angry with the world, hence punished it by withdrawing his light for a time.

Time To Give Up On Politics? Conventional politics is dead. Politics no longer produces charismatic leaders with good ideas. JFK, actually a rather mediocre President, not dissimilar to Obama, now seems like a God thanks to the sepia glow of history. Many of his speeches were superb and genuinely intellectual. But even if JFK came back now, he wouldn’t fare any better in terms of really transforming America, and would probably be assassinated all over again! What we need is a Caesar, Napoleon or Alexander the Great, with the soul

of Leibniz, Plato or Pythagoras. We need radical politics and radical solutions. Consensus will never accomplish anything. Consensus politics simply leads to stagnation, muddle and gridlock – exactly as we see in America today. Ironically, the most remarkable feature of consensus politics in America is that no one is willing to consent anymore. No one will compromise. So the logic of non-compromise must now be followed through. We need to start breaking up politically gridlocked nation-states into free city-states where everyone is on the same wavelength and can move forward together, with common purpose.

Assassination Positive liberty Presidents – such as Lincoln and JFK – are much more likely to be assassinated than negative liberty Presidents (most American Presidents).

The Power of the State Positive Liberty = the Progressive Power of the State. Negative Liberty = the Negative Power of the Individual. Negative liberty is conservative and seeks to protect the individual from State Power. Above all, it’s all about the protection of the power and assets of the private elites. Positive liberty is progressive and seeks to use State Power to overcome entrenched individual and family interests (the interests of the Old World Order, of privilege, dynastic inheritance, nepotism and cronyism, sexism and racism.) 100% inheritance tax is the supreme positive liberty tax since it destroys the private elites once and for all and establishes the absolute power of the Commonwealth – the People. The State.

George Washington and the Illuminati Mount Vernon, October 24, 1798.

Revd Sir (to Reverend G. W. Snyder:) I have your favor of the 17th. instant before me; and my only motive to trouble you with the receipt of this letter, is to explain, and correct a mistake which I perceive the hurry in which I am obliged, often, to write letters, have led you into. It was not my intention to doubt that, the Doctrines of the Illuminati, and principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no one is more truly satisfied of this fact than I am. The idea that I meant to convey, was, that I did not believe that the Lodges of Free Masons in this Country had, as Societies, endeavoured to propagate the diabolical tenets of the first, or pernicious principles of the latter (if they are susceptible of separation). That Individuals of them may have done it, or that the founder, or instrument employed to found, the Democratic Societies in the United States, may have had these objects; and actually had a separation of the People from their Government in view, is too evident to be questioned. My occupations are such, that but little leisure is allowed me to read News Papers, or Books of any kind; the reading of letters, and preparing answers, absorb much of my time. With respect, etc.

***** Note that “Illuminatus” = “Jacobin.”

***** So, who was leading the Illuminati, Jacobins and “Democratic Societies” in America? – none other than the great Illuminatus Thomas Jefferson, founder of the radical Democratic-Republican Party. Had Jefferson been free of the interference of people like Washington and Alexander Hamilton (founder of the Federalist Party), he would have created a dazzling left wing Jacobin America that would now be the glory of humanity. Wikipedia says of Hamilton’s party, “The Federalist Party was the first American political party, from the early 1790s to 1816, the era of the First Party System, with remnants lasting into the 1820s. The Federalists controlled the federal government until 1801. The party was formed by Alexander Hamilton, who, during George Washington’s first term, built a network of supporters, largely urban bankers and businessmen, to support his fiscal policies. These supporters grew into the Federalist Party committed to a fiscally sound and nationalistic government. The United

States’ only Federalist president was John Adams; although George Washington was broadly sympathetic to the Federalist program, he remained an independent during his entire presidency.” So, there you have it in a nutshell. Washington was sympathetic to Hamilton’s party of the rich elites – the bankers and businessmen – while more or less directly accusing Jefferson of seeking to separate the people from the Government. What Jefferson actually wanted to accomplish was the separation of the people from any oligarchic Government operating in the interests of the particular will of the rich faction rather than the General will of the people. Here we have the origin of the belief that the Illuminati are the puppet masters secretly running America and that they are committed to the extreme left-wing objectives of the Jacobins. Of course, anyone who actually bothers to look rationally and objectively at America immediately sees an extremely right wing country ruled by rich bankers and businessmen, exactly as Jefferson feared and warned against! The puppet masters are the super rich elites of free-market capitalism, and they have extreme right wing objectives. In other words, the Illuminati myth is the inverse of what is actually going on in America. Why are American right wingers so incredibly stupid? There isn’t a trace of left wing influence in America. More’s the pity. Ayn Rand’s mad book Atlas Shrugged resurrected the idea of some mythical left-wing elite (Illuminati Jacobins) running America and persecuting the capitalists. There’s just one problem – no such thing has ever happened in America. America has always been ruled by its rich, privileged elites. Even Jefferson couldn’t do anything about it.

The Estates Pre-Revolutionary France was divided into a system of “Estates”. These were: 1) The Zero Estate (Monarchy): the monarch himself, who stood outside and above the system of estates (like God). 2) The First Estate (Religion): the clergy. 3) The Second Estate (Aristocracy): the French nobility. 4) The Third Estate (the People): the commoners.

Here we see the typical power structure of the world: the elite families and the priest caste are in charge, and the people (the vast majority) are at the bottom of the pile. The Second Estate were exempt from taxes while the free peasants who owned their own land were heavily taxed. The Second Estate therefore had no interest in reforming the system while the Third Estate were extremely eager for reform – a recipe for Revolution. We see exactly the same conditions in today’s world. The elite are barely taxed while the ordinary people are punitively taxed. It’s always the case that the elite avoid and evade taxation, and their greed is what ultimately destroys them. They never learn their lesson. In addition, the First and Second Estates relied on the labour of the Third, which made the latter’s unequal status all the more glaring and galling. The Zero, First and Second Estates were entirely reliant on the Third Estate (just as the capitalist elite are entirely dependent on their workers), and yet they treated them with utter contempt, making Revolution inevitable. There was virtually zero mobility in the Estates system. A commoner could rise only through extreme bravery on the battlefield, extreme intelligence (despite receiving little or no education), extreme piety, or extreme beauty (leading to an advantageous marriage). More or less the same is true today in every nation of the world. What is the “Old World Order”? It’s the ancien régime (the old regime, the ancient regime, the old and traditional ways of doing things). We need a New World Order to sweep away the old Estates (class) system that still rules our world.

The Fifth Estate “The term ‘Fifth Estate’ has no fixed meaning, but is used to describe any class or group in society other than the clergy (First Estate), the nobility (Second Estate), the commoners (Third Estate), and the press (Fourth Estate). It has been used to describe civil society (including trade unions) and the poor or the proletariat. It can also be used to describe media outlets (including the blogosphere) that see themselves in opposition to mainstream media (the official Press). The term is entirely different in origin and meaning from ‘Fifth Column’, which is used to describe subversive or insurgent elements in a society. ... Nimmo and Combs assert that political

pundits constitute a Fifth Estate. Media researcher Stephen D. Cooper argues that bloggers are the Fifth Estate. William Dutton has argued that the Fifth Estate is not simply the blogging community, nor an extension of the media, but ‘networked individuals’ enabled by the Internet in ways that can hold the other estates accountable.” – Wikipedia

The Non-Estate Those who reject the Estates System entirely are the Non-Estate, the AntiEstate. Anyone who participates in the Estates System has a false consciousness, the consciousness indoctrinated into them by the Estates System itself. The Estates System uses class, religion, privilege, status, nepotism, cronyism, and inheritance to perpetuate its belief system and attitudes. The Anti-Estate is opposed to the “complicitous silence” of the Estates, the subtext, the cultural assumptions, the unwritten rules, the tacit understandings that keep people in their place and maintain the status quo.

Left, Right and Centre “The political terms Left and Right were coined during the French Revolution (1789–1799), referring to the seating arrangement in the Estates General: those who sat on the left generally opposed the monarchy and supported the revolution, including the creation of a republic and secularization, while those on the right were supportive of the traditional institutions of the Old Regime.” – Wikipedia The elite have always claimed the right side, the “superior” side, the side of higher status. If you call yourself right wing then you are associating yourself with the rich, with the clergy, with the conservatives, reactionaries and counter-revolutionaries, those who want to maintain the old ways. The left, right, and centre are usually associated, respectively, with socialism (the people), conservatism (the elite), and liberalism (the comfortably off), or with the working class, upper class and middle class.

Life-Changing Hollywood is Mythos Central, the Dream Factory, churning out endless stories. People talk of a book, a movie, a play, a song or a poem changing their life. They never talk of a mathematical equation or a scientific experiment changing them.

That’s because we are wired for Mythos and not for Logos. We are story people. That’s why it’s so hard for humanity to become rational and sane. It’s much more attracted to emotional “truth” than actual truth. That’s humanity’s tragedy. The love and light crew – the emotional, sentimental, nostalgic hordes – are an immense obstacle to human progress. They think they’re the solution. They’re not: they’re a huge part of the problem!

The Gangster Equation “The great nations have always acted like gangsters, and the small nations like prostitutes.” – Stanley Kubrick The rich have always acted like gangsters, and the poor like prostitutes.

The Weakest Link Right wingers support the individual and the family over the community and society. Given that a chain is only as strong as its weakest link, the right wing worldview leads to a vast underclass of broken links that don’t prosper as individuals or are trapped within dysfunctional families. Right wing ideology always leads to an atomised society of different classes, and of competing networks, crony groups, cartels, in-crowds, successful families versus unsuccessful families. Right wing parents have “sharp elbows” and use them with gusto. Right wingers always seek to raise themselves up by putting others down. They simply can’t grasp the concept of cooperation and moving forward together. They are like beasts from the jungle. Right wingers are those who have failed to evolve.

Any Old Job? Capitalism is reasonably good at producing jobs – except they are typically low quality, low paid, soul destroying jobs that involve the mass production of junk that does nothing at all to improve the quality of the people or the nation. In a sane, rational State, jobs must be good jobs, not any old jobs. They must be fulfilling, satisfying, and get the most from people. All jobs should be advancing the quality of the people and the State.

U and Non-U

“U and non-U English usage, with ‘U’ standing for ‘upper class’, and ‘nonU’ representing the aspiring middle classes, was part of the terminology of popular discourse of social dialects (sociolects) in Britain and New England in the 1950s. The debate did not concern itself with the speech of the working classes, who in many instances used the same words as the upper classes. For this reason, the different vocabularies often can appear quite counter-intuitive: the middle classes prefer ‘fancy’ or fashionable words, even neologisms and often euphemisms, in attempts to make themselves sound more refined, while the upper classes in many cases stick to the same plain and traditional words that the working classes also use, as, conscious of their status, they have no need to make themselves sound more refined.” – Wikipedia

The Media Game The Media show you what they want to show you, not what you want to be shown. They have their agenda and you have yours. They are very different agendas. The Media’s game is purely to brainwash you with their views, to make money from you, to ensure that you are never exposed to ideas hostile to their interests and to ensure that any such ideas are discredited. “Political correctness” is a superb tool of the elite to make it impossible to say everything that needs to be said. Political correctness renders all debates bland, sterile and neutral. No one is permitted to say anything controversial or daring. No one is allowed to identify the internal “enemy”; no one is allowed to criticise the “other”. For example, anyone who dares to criticise Islam is called an Islamophobe and this is wholly unacceptable in the world of the politically correct. So, rather than Islam being challenged for its obnoxious beliefs and practices, it’s effectively defended and endorsed by the politically correct. Political correctness seeks to maintain the status quo – the position most favourable to the elite – and it does so by denouncing any radical, revolutionary ideas.

The Meaning of Silence A speech can be much more important for what it doesn’t say than for what it does. One of the most important things to study in any society is what is not said. Why is it not said? Whose agenda is being served? Why did people agree to be silent, or how were they coerced into silence?

Why was Hitler successful? Because he dared to say that which many people were secretly thinking but which, previously, no one had ever dreamt of saying publicly. He made the subtext the text. In his case, he brought to the surface a terrible, unwarranted hatred of the “other”, which proved monstrous and then disastrous. Yet it’s not only the hateful that most societies seek to suppress. They also eagerly censor the truth.

The Hustle “David O Russell’s American Hustle is the best film about confidence tricksters since David Mamet’s House of Games (1987). Like Mamet, Russell understands that professional con artists are simply doing the same thing as everyone else but in a more self-conscious and calculated way. As he has pointed out, deception and self-deception are a ‘necessary component of the software of humanity’.” – Geoffrey Macnab, The Independent The average person can’t wait to succumb to propaganda, to swallow “the Big Lie” hook, line and sinker. People long to be conned, hustled, duped. They want to suspend their disbelief and believe all the time. It’s how they cope with life, how they get through it. To be a Mythos person is to be mired in deception, self-deception, belief, superstition, gullibility, credulity, in every aspect of the Big Con. Life, for most people, is simply about to what con they want to fall victim. “As far as I could tell, people were conning each other all the time to get what they wanted.” – Irving Rosenfeld, a conman, in Hustle

The Propaganda War Us and Them The axis of evil. The good and the bad. The good and the evil. The sheep and the goats. The saved and the damned.

The elect and the reprobates. The civilised and the barbarians. The Chosen People and the goyim. The Master Race and the subhuman. U and Non-U. Us and the “Other”. Where do you stand in the propaganda war?

***** Propaganda = Spin = Mythos = Narrative = Conditioning = Brainwashing = Belief = Indoctrination = Religion = Politics = Psychology.

No Morals, No Facts “There are no moral phenomena, but only moral interpretations of phenomena.” – Nietzsche “There are no facts, only interpretations.” – Nietzsche

***** “Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” – Daniel Patrick Moynihan But “facts” are just collective opinions and interpretations. All Muslims believe that Mohammed factually had a encounter with divinity. He didn’t. That’s a fact.

The Mystery When Abraham heard a voice in his head ordering him to murder his son, why didn’t he say, “No ... Over my dead body”? Instead, he replied, “Yes ... where do I stab, throat or heart?” And half the world’s population in today’s world gives the same answer. Is it any wonder our world is evil and depraved? Half of humanity worships the Devil and calls him God. We must find a Final Solution to these monsters.

The Lie In Luke 23:43, Jesus Christ says to the “good” criminal being crucified beside him: “Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in paradise.” Yet in Matthew 12:40, he says, “For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of a whale, so the Son of Man will be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.” In other words, Jesus will be in the grave for three days and three nights after his crucifixion – yet he has just stated that he will be in paradise straight after he dies. Which is it? Remember, mistakes are not allowed in the Bible since it’s the infallible Word of God. The truth is that the Bible has errors on every page and is nothing but lies and nonsense from beginning to end. Only the blind refuse to see the truth.

Icons Marilyn Monroe, Princess Diana, Grace Kelly, Jackie Onassis Kennedy are all beautiful and tragic female icons. Judy Garland wasn’t beautiful enough to be a heterosexual icon, but she was tragic enough to be a gay icon. The top icons must be beautiful and tragic. Nothing else will suffice. It’s even better if they are linked to royalty or Presidents. Many women have a tattoo of Marilyn Monroe. How many have a tattoo of Marie Curie? What does that tell you?!

The Power Isle When you go into a well-managed supermarket, you will often find a “power isle” containing all of their most enticing offers, bargains and most popular products. The power isle is always on the right since right handed people have a bias for anything on the right. Everything in a supermarket is psychologically designed and located to maximise your buying inclinations (and thus maximise profit for the supermarket).

The Three Languages In an ideal world, everyone should have three languages: 1) A local language (the language of your country). 2) A global language (the language of the world).

3) A universal language (the language of the cosmos, of existence itself). If you live in Germany, your local language would be German, the global language would be English (probably) and the universal language mathematics. Everyone in the world should be able to communicate with everyone else in the world using one common language, and everyone should be able to communicate with any alien species using the universal language of mathematics.

The Favour Economy The world’s economy is based on “favours”: people doing favours for others and calling in favours. The bigger the favours, the bigger the bond between people. The biggest favours involve the largest amounts of money, the highest risks, the most bending or even breaking of the law. The “favours economy” is of course intimately connected to cronyism, nepotism, privilege, the old school tie, the old boy network, the “right” religion, the Masons, and so on. It’s inherently corrupt and involves continual cover-ups as second nature. A British legal expert opined that people who came to Britain from Pakistan had arrived from a culture where corruption was endemic. Who’s this guy kidding? Britain can easily compete with America for being the most corrupt nation on earth. Corruption is institutionalised in the class system of Britain and America. Any nation with an enormously wealthy tiny elite is by definition corrupt since only through corrupt means could such disproportionate riches find their way into so few hands. It’s not as if these people are disproportionately harder working, more talented or more intelligent than everyone else. In fact, usually the reverse is true: they are anti-meritocratic and the product of pure privilege and inheritance. What’s the difference between the Mafia and the elites of the UK and the USA? The latter went through their phase of extreme violence centuries ago, and created the law to legitimise their crimes, the banking system to launder their money, and the police to protect their stolen goods.

The Management Game The managements of capitalist companies and corporations are extremely dedicated to cutting costs in their organisations, except in one specific arena

– the cost of themselves! Unlike everything else, this cost is always going up, to an eye-watering degree. Here we see the quintessence of free-market capitalism. Those at the top keep paying themselves more and more, and taking more and more, while relentlessly giving everyone else less and less and permitting them less and less. It’s legalised theft and expropriation. The rich always ensure that the law supports their crimes and declares them “legal”. This is the precise mechanism that has enabled 1% of the people to own half the world. Eventually, they will own 99%. Unless the rest of us stop them. The simplest way is through 100% inheritance tax. No matter how much the rich pay themselves, it will all be returned to the people, the Commonwealth, when they die.

The Circles We all belong to circles: the circle of family, of neighbours, of friends, of people in the same town or city, of those in the same country. We belong to circles of work, of religion, of community, of class, economic status, academic attainment, and so on. There are also circles to which we don’t belong but with which we intersect: circles of different religions, different classes, different countries, different friendship groups, immigrants, difference races, the opposite sex, people of different sexuality, the “other”, and so on. Left wing people are generally warm and friendly towards circles to which they don’t directly belong while right wing people are most often antagonistic towards “alien” circles. All the great ills – racism, sexism, discrimination, nationalism, cronyism, privilege, nepotism, inheritance, religious intolerance – stem from the desire to favour some circles over others and put other circles down. The ultimate “evil” circles are the selfish individual, the sharp-elbowed family always acting in its own self-interest, intolerant religions that believe they have a special link with “God” (Chosen People religions), the financial class that believes it’s elite (Masters of the Universe), and the nation or race that believes itself superior to all others (the Master Race). These are the ground of all right wing values: of conservatism, prejudice, libertarianism, free-market capitalism, negative liberty, dynastic inheritance. They underpin the old school tie, the old boy network, the Masons, and so on.

They’re extremely hostile to community, society and, above all, the State serving the General Will. The General Will State (Commonwealth State) is the supreme circle, embracing all others. The General Will State is one that does everything to help all of the different circles of which it’s comprised, providing they are tolerant and doing no harm to others (otherwise, the General Will State is obligated to take action against these divisive particular wills). Right wingers despise the General Will State because they are opposed to all circles that they don’t like and to which they don’t belong. It’s really that simple. Everything else is propaganda.

The Gangster Elite “An article that recently came out in Rolling Stone, titled ‘Gangster Bankers: Too Big to Jail,’ by Matt Taibbi, asserts that the government is afraid to prosecute powerful bankers, such as those running HSBC. Taibbi says that there’s ‘an arrestable class and an unarrestable class.’” – Noam Chomsky “Well, there’s always a class war going on. The United States, to an unusual extent, is a business-run society, more so than others. The business classes are very class-conscious – they’re constantly fighting a bitter class war to improve their power and diminish opposition. Occasionally this is recognized. We don’t use the term ‘working class’ here because it’s a taboo term. You’re supposed to say ‘middle class,’ because it helps diminish the understanding that there’s a class war going on.” – Noam Chomsky “We are machines, we are robots, we plug our scanner in, we’re holding it, but we might as well be plugging it into ourselves. ... We don’t think for ourselves, maybe they don’t trust us to think for ourselves as human beings, I don’t know.” – BBC Panorama undercover reporter Adam Littler who took an agency job at one of Amazon’s vast UK warehouses. “The characteristics of this type of job, the evidence shows increased risk of mental illness and physical illness. ... There are always going to be menial jobs, but we can make them better or worse. And it seems to me the demands of efficiency at the cost of individual’s health and wellbeing – it’s got to be balanced. ... [This is] all the bad stuff at once.” – Professor Michael Marmot (one of Britain’s leading experts on stress at work).

***** You may not think you’re in a class war – and that’s exactly why the ruling class are walking all over you. For you to have a chance in life, you must get rid of the elite class that at all times rules in its own interests (and contrary to yours). 100% inheritance tax is the one, sure antidote to the elite dynastic rulers.

Loaded Words In the rhetoric of American right wingers: “Socialism” = “collectivism” = “government” = “State” = “evil”. “Capitalism” = “individualism” = “choice” = “liberty” = “good”. Words are never used “innocently”. They always come with a loaded meaning, an agenda. If you watch the Republican and Democratic political conventions in America, you will notice that each convention has a list of “good” and “bad” words that are churned out relentlessly by speaker after speaker. The Republican and Democratic lists are almost the inverse of each other. However, there’s also a list of words common to both, including such favourites as: “change”, “freedom,” “justice”, “patriotism”, “choice”, “growth”, “hard-working families”, “the solid middle class”, “aspiration”, “the American Dream”, “the best is yet to come”, “proud to be an American”, “America is the greatest nation in the world”, and, above all, “God bless America.”

The Purpose of Life A Muslim woman dressed in a black robe, with her face veiled, said that the purpose of life is to reach paradise. Of course, this is 100% false. The purpose of life is to understand life and to obtain the definitive, final answer to life. To do so, one must become God. Stupid people – such as Abrahamists – want to be given paradise, a place where they will feel good. That is, they are driven by the desire to reach a final destination where they will enjoy only good feelings and no bad feelings. It’s all about their feelings, and nothing else. Smart people want to reach a destination where they know. Do you see the staggering difference between thinking and feeling types? They have

completely different objectives. A feeling person doesn’t mind knowing nothing provided he feels good. A feeling person won’t eat from the Tree of Knowledge if it jeopardises his place in paradise where he will permanently feel good. He is certain to obey a tyrannical “God” if that’s what it takes to gain admission to paradise. A thinking person, on the other hand, wouldn’t dream of not eating of the Tree of Knowledge if that’s the route to truth and knowledge. Feeling types want an all-powerful God to grant them heaven. Thinking types want to become God in order to know everything. These two types have nothing in common. Feeling types aren’t interested in answers as far as knowledge goes. They’re not interested in explaining God’s existence or asking God to explain existence. All they want is to be with God, feeling good and safe. Thinking types, however, want answers, and must have them. The only way to get them isn’t by worshipping God but by becoming God. All those who worship God are slaves. All those who want to become God are autonomous, and they will bow to no one. G K Chesterton wrote, “Rossetti makes the remark somewhere, bitterly but with great truth, that the worst moment for the atheist is when he is really thankful and has nobody to thank.” Only a feeling type could make such an absurd statement. Why would any thinking person experience any need to “thank” someone? Thank whom, and for what? The worst moment for a believer is when he realises that he’s giving thanks to an “imaginary friend”. There’s no one there, no one to thank. Ontological mathematics defines us, not God. No one needs to “thank” mathematics. Feeling humans beings are the failed Mythos species. Thinking human beings are the Logos human beings who will become Gods. Which side are you on? There are two approaches to religion: worshipping an all-powerful being, or seeking to become all-powerful yourself. These are 100% different approaches to religion. The two cannot co-exist. There’s no question who will win – the Coming Race of Gods. Are you one of them? Abrahamism stands for the failed past of the human race, and the Illuminati for the successful future. Join HyperHumanity. Join the Gods. Join the Illuminati.

Not Hearing “The truth that makes men free is for the most part the truth which men prefer not to hear.” – Herbert Agar Propaganda is what people want to hear. The truth is that to which they will never listen.

True and False Dreams “Dreams, my friend, are hard to unravel, wayward drifting things. Not all we glimpse in them will come to pass. For there are two gates through which these insubstantial visions reach us. One is made of horn, the other of ivory. Those that come through the carved ivory gate are will-o’-the-wisps. Their message bears no fruit. But the dreams that pass through the gate of burnished horn are fraught with truth for the dreamer who can see them.” – Penelope in Homer’s Odyssey

The Den of the Thief “Whoever believes in me shall never die. Believe in me and you shall see the Glory of God.” – Jesus Christ So, if you don’t believe in Jesus Christ you shall die and you won’t see paradise. But why is “belief” in Jesus Christ so important in this scheme? If you were God, would you care one iota whether or not people believed in you? Above all, would you punish people because they didn’t? What kind of narcissist would you have to be to make people’s faith in you the deciding factor between infinite pleasure and infinite pain? It’s all about “you”, isn’t it? You are an egomaniac. You’re not God at all, but his opposite. You are not humanity’s servant, but it’s master and dictator. Everyone must do your bidding – or suffer the most grotesque consequences conceivable. In such a case, any decent, moral human being will never believe in such a monster.

***** “God will provide” – tell that to the billions for whom he hasn’t provided. In fact, his most ardent believers are frequently those for whom he has provided the least. The less he provides, the more the believers believe.

Such is the nature of cognitive dissonance. You either have to stop believing or believe even more.

***** What is Christianity? It’s an incredible Mythos designed to show that a Messianic Jewish rabbi who died on a Roman cross after raising a violent insurrection against the Romans on Passover (crushed by many hundreds of Roman soldiers – a full cohort) was in fact “God”. It’s perhaps the greatest story ever told because it’s also the silliest story ever told and yet still manages to convince billions, such is its emotional power. It hits all the right buttons for feeling types – while leaving rational types slack-jawed at its absurdity. It’s the greatest propaganda of all, rivalled only by Islam.

The Origin of Propaganda The word “propaganda” comes from Congregatio de propaganda fide – the Vatican Congregation or College of cardinals for propagating the Catholic faith. The term is now applied to any proselytising scheme or endeavour to influence public opinion in the political, social, economic, philosophical, scientific or religious spheres. Propaganda is always about Mythos and never about Logos. The essence of propaganda is a “narrative” that the propagandists want you to take on board and internalize. Ordinary people have excellent memories for narrative, and none at all for equations, proofs, abstractions, difficult philosophical lines of arguments, and so on. That’s why we live in a propaganda world – a world of stories designed to promote the causes of the rich and powerful.

Propaganda We’re in an ocean of propaganda. It’s everywhere. We’re saturated by it. We gorge on it. We can’t escape it. People are lying to us left, right and centre in order to get their own way and make us do their bidding. Many of them are lying to themselves too. We’re surrounded by opinions, beliefs, conjectures, interpretations, intuitions, hypotheses, theories, revelations, stories, myths and legends. We’re bombarded by data and we have no idea if it comes from the gate of horn (Truth) or the gate of ivory (Lies).

The fundamental question is where is the real truth to be found?

***** “What is truth?” – Mathematics 1+1=2