236 52 158MB
English Pages [440] Year 1985
Table of contents :
Front Cover
Copyright
Front Matter in Greek
CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
2. NORTHERN SPORADES
3. EXCAVATION
4. FINDS
5. THE AGIOS PETROS CULTURE
6. THE GREEK NEOLITHIC OF THE LATE 6th and 5th MILLENNIA
7. WESTERN ANATOLIA IN THE LATE 6th and 5th MILLENNIA
8. THE AEGEAN NEOLITHIC DURING THE LATE 6th and 5th MILLENNIA
9. CONCLUSIONS
APPENDICES
BIBLIOGRAPHY
PLANS AND FIGURES
ILLUSTRATIONS
Agios Petros A Neolithic site in the Northern Sporades Aegean Relationships during the Neolithic of the 5th Millennium
Nikos Efstratiou
BAR International Series 241
1985
B.A.R.
5, Centremead, Osney Mead, Oxford OX2 0ES, England.
GENERAL EDITORS A.R Hands� B.Sc., M.A., D.Phil. D.R Walker, M.A.
B.A.R.-S241, 1985: 'Agios Petros: A Neolithic site in the Northern Sporades 1•
©
Nikos Efstratiou, 1985.
The author’s moral rights under the 1988 UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act are hereby expressly asserted.
All rights reserved. No part of this work may be copied, reproduced, stored, sold, distributed, scanned, saved in any form of digital format or transmitted in any form digitally, without the written permission of the Publisher.
ISBN 9780860543114 paperback ISBN 9781407339962 e-book DOI https://doi.org/10.30861/9780860543114 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library This book is available at www.barpublishing.com
• • •
OT C CV n epvav x aptveg a x govtag g e n aeog e va x atvoupyto e gnobto x at T O v txave K a. g Om T a 8 eXptvta T TK a vyaC r e Xnt8a K epbog T oo 0 Xtou c e g t a vepwntv i l x ap6ta. O bua i reag Durns.
D ro S aaxaXo g ou A rpr y rpto P e co m n
.
A r I O E MLa VE0Ä .L8L10 1 AIrAIAKEE
EXEEEIE
0 npotaToptxoc OUWVUUn e tvat 8EL
EVO LC
ano
T n
to . T OO ,
6 nc
veoÄt8txn AUTO
nou
OTL
TO
xat
nÄouato avaaxawtxo
a pxn T nc
" [ T IN /
T LC
OUOLOTT ITEC Tn
xat
utac
WaLVEraL
nn epLaxn
TWV
uexpt
Ä LTL UTLI en
EÄÄabac
Too
ae
auv8ua-
xpovoÄoytxa
avnxet
EÄÄaba a Ua xat
i n
arn
uean
xaTa
T r i
paywyn
- nou napouataCeTat
T n 5 n
ptCtxa T TI V
Etvau
UÄLXOU
X LÄLE3La bev
noÄu
Too OLHLOUOU
e tTav OUTE ano-
TO O VEOÄLeLHOU noÄtTtago x
xapaxTnptCeTat
AVTLeETa
ano
n
no-
u ta auTo8uva-
evTaaaeTat
nou ncpuÄaußavouv ° v .
govo
UET TIV
M . Aata. TWV avaaxawtxwv
e teuXonÄa artxn, GTO
i 3 L8Ä .L0
xat
entang
veoÄt8txn
8E8OUEVWV
yewuopwa rAcyta,
T LHOU Atyataxou xwpou onwc ue un
8ELXVOUV
TOV nOÄLTLOTLX0 xapa-
otxoÄoytxa neptoxn nou
T T '
xat
TexvoTpo-
b t anoÄtTtaTt-
H eTpou a UaCet
npoexTaan
8 Lawepovra npoßinuaTa nou awopouv
npwtun
TETOLWV
veoÄtbtxn nept abo.
eEeÄtEewv
n0 X0xXnp c ouevn I l eXern - xepauetxn,
xapa w mpt a rt-
E i e ea m atag
TOU avaaxawtmou
V T IOLWV C LUTWV
nÄatato
unaPEn
E L6Lx0Tcpa T nc e caaaxLac.
TexvoAaytxa xat
eva eup urepo
n
T wo . aXETLXC L UE
uta anÄn
xat
f l eTpou
OTT )
bptaxeTat
e t8wA .onÄaaTtxnc
0 evTontauoc
LEÄETT I
B. Enopabwv
TaUTOTT ITa TWV
otxovoutxa,
Etat
T r '
noÄtTtaTtxa OUTE
T nc n nc i .p c oTLxnc
xuptwc
LEÄETT I-
to . V T IOLa TOU av aroÄtxou Atyatou,
to . eupnuaTa TOU Aytou
entxpaTouae
Atyatou HU M
00 . QC
xat
YELTOVLXT IQ
eupnuaTa ano
ano
onwc
T nc
enubpaaetc UE
E LVaL
t btatTepnc
xTnpa TOU V T IOLWTLXOU
un
UÄLX0
otxtauo nou xaÄunTet
5ng XLÄLETLaC
voTta BaÄxavtxn.
ueaa ano
nou
uovwgevn
hat
yewuopwoÄoytxa aTOLXELa 6ELXVOUV OTL
n teavo OTL
OTT IV
Enopabec
tt t .o . TOU O LHL U L LOU
L8LaLTEPa a r il laVTLX0
EXTOC ano
enawwv
EVTUnWan
Hopei -cc
EXOUV aVa l taÄUOTEL
geyaÄuTepo
b o b ac taaa TO
E LVaL
M. A c t a xat
xwv
°TLC
vnatwTtmou A tyatou.
xepauetxnc
OTUÄLOTLXEC
T n
XIAIETIAI
nepto80.
ypaninc
ntac nou
5 nc
Kupa Havaytac
y t a EVa LOVLUO VEOÄLeLX0
Tng
BOPELEC En0P 118EC
TOU AYLOU HeTpou nou avaaxawTnxe
Tnc
al7 ta neptßaÄÄovitxa xat
npoxetTat
xnc
°TLC
apxatoTepouc nou
Too
yeyovoc
Twpa HaTW ano ge
0 1 .1 4 1 .0 1 10Q
TOUC
nEPLO V I
f lapa TO
0 1 . Lo
bean
ETH NEOA DBIKH THE
V T IOL6 *a TOU xoÄnou
OTT
H E T P O E
auto b tyet
TOU AyLOU
neptßaÄÄov,
e va ranboc ano
n pÄLTLpTLxn E EEXLEn
nepto80.
T LC
aXEC TELQ
na-
EÄÄabac
Too xat
EV-
V T IOLWM. Aat ag
C ONTENTS P age
1
1 .
I NTRODUCTION
2 .
N ORTHERN S PORADES 2 .1.
T he a rchipelago o f
2 .2.
G eology
t he n orthern S porades - G eneral
3
4 2 .2.1. 2 .3.
T erra r ossa
5
N atural p osition
6
2 .3.1.
8
T oponymic q uestions
AGIOS P ETROS 2 .4.
3 .
8
2 .4.1.
9
T he f auna - A nimals - E veryday l ife
E XCAVATION 3 .1.
T he d evelopment
3 .2.
T heochares's
3 .3.
T he s tratigraphy o f A gios P etros
1 6
3 .3.1.
E xcavation o f
1 9
3 .3.2.
R e-examination o f
3 .4.
4 .
T he n atural s etting
o f
t he e xcavation
e xcavation
1 1 1 2
1 981 t he s tratigraphy
2 1
C omparison b etween t he o ld a nd n ew d ata - D iscussion
2 3
P ottery - F abric
2 6
F INDS 4 .1.
4 .1.1.
D ecorative
t echniques
2 7
4 .1.2.
S hapes
2 8
4 .1.3.
D ecoration
3 2
4 .2.
4 .3.
5 .
6 .
7 .
F igurines
3 7
4 .2.1.
4 3
C onstruction m ethods
S mall
T HE A GIOS
f inds
4 4
P ETROS
C ULTURE
5 .1.
T he A gios P etros
C ulture
5 .2.
C ultural
5 .3.
E nvironment
5 .4.
N ature
5 .5.
C ultural A ffinities
5 1
a ssemblage
o f
a nd
t he
5 1
l ite
5 2
S ite
5 6
5 .5.1.
S ettlement
5 9
5 .5.2.
P ottery
6 1
5 .5.3.
F igurines
6 8
5 .6.
O bsidian and T rade
5 .7.
T he
p lace
o f
t he A gios P etros
T HE GREEK N EOLITHIC o f
7 4
O F T HE LATE
6 th a nd
6 .1.
S tate
6 .2.
P resentation a nd d iscussion o f T he
6 .2.2.
The m iddle
8 7
e arly n eolithic
6 .3.
P ottery g roups
6 .4.
T echnology
6 .5.
S ocial
7 7
5 th M ILLENNIA
r esearch
6 .2.1.
t he
m aterial
p eriod
a nd
i nterregional
8 8 8 9
n eolithic p eriod r elationships
9 5 9 8 1 02
a nd Economic
W ESTERN A NATOLIA I N T HE 7 .1.
G eomorphological
7 .2.
S tate
7 .3.
C hronological
o f
c ulture
o rganization
LATE 6 th and
c onsiderations
r esearch f ramework
1 04
5 th M ILLENNIA 1 09 1 10 1 12
7 .4.
T he
e arly c halcolithic c ultures
7 .5.
T he
l ate c halColithic c ultures
7 .6.
o f A natolia
C ultural a reas o f n orth-western A natolia a nd p ottery
1 14 1 15 1 16
g roups
7 .7.
7 .6.1.
N orth-western A natolia
1 17
7 .6.2.
E astern A egean i slands
1 19
I nterregional r elationships
1 20
8 .
T HE A EGEAN N EOLITHIC D URING T HE L ATE 6 th a nd 5 th M ILLENNIA
1 25
9 .
C ONCLUSIONS
1 35
A PPENDIXES
1 37
B IBLIOGRAPHY
1 73
P LANS
1 91
F IGURES
2 14
I LLUSTRATIONS
3 23
A CKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Among t he p eople Who i nfluenced m y w ork i n v arious ways, P rofessor D emetrios T heochares h olds a s pecial p osition . H is l ectures
i n
t he
University
o f
T hessaloniki
and
h is
l ove
p rehistory w ere f or m e a c ontinual s ource o f e nthusiasm .
t he l ate i nspired o f
G reek
I r ecall with
g ratitude t he c are with which h e f ollowed t he f irst s teps o f m y s tudies i n E ngland
a nd
t he
e ncouragement
h e g ave
m e
a t
d ifferent
s tages
o f
my
w ork. T o
h is
wife
Maria T heochares
I e xpress
my
d eepest
t hanks
f or
t he
c onfidence s he showed i n me b y a llowing me t o s tudy and p ublish t he m aterial
f rom Agios P etros.
I wish
t o
Professor
t hank
J .D.
e ncouragement
my
Evans
t hroughout
s upervisor for
his
t he
a t
t he
I nstitute o f Archaeology
constant
support,
c omposition o f m y
patience
and
t hesis.
I am p articularly grateful t o my joint s upervisor Dr. J . N andris f or t he d iscussions I had with h im o n s pecific p roblems o f t he G reek n eolithic p eriod.
I wish a lso t o
t hank
h im
f or
a ll
h is
a dvice a nd
f riendship. T he
h elp
was
immense .
o ut
t he
o f
t he
E phor
I must
t rial
o f
t he Museum o f V olos D r G .
t hank h im
excavation
e specially
o n
Agios
f or
P etros
h is
i n
C hourmouziades
p ermission
s ummer
1 981
t o
c arry
and
h is
h ospitality d uring my s tay i n V olos. A n umber o f I f eel
grateful
q uestions P etros;
o ther p eople h elped me f or
t he
c oncerning
g enerous
t he
g eological
i n d ifferent p hases o f my w ork .
h elp
o f
D r
C laudio
a spects
o f
t he
V ita-Finzi
s ettlement
on
o f A gios
I must t hank h im e specially f or making a vailable t o me t he
f acilities o f
t he Geographical D epartment o f University C ollege f or T he c ontribution o f D r N . F lemming t o my s tudy o f
various analyses. t he n ature o f my d eepest
t he A gios P etros
t hanks
f or
h is
s ettlement
h elp
a nd
was v ital .
I w ish t o e xpress
c ollaboration d uring
my
d ig
o n
t he
s ite. I want
a lso
t o
t hank
D r
D .
F rench,
I nstitute a t Ankara f or a llowing me, s tudy t he material
D irector
o f
d uring my v isit
t he
B ritish
t o T urkey,
t o
f rom t he v arious s urveys i n Anatolia a nd f or h is
h ospitality. I must a lso t hank Mr J . Mellaart f or h is willingness t o r ead a nd c omment
u pon A natolian c hapter o f m y
t hesis.
I am i ndebted t o my f riends i n t he Museum o f Volos G . P apadaKiMichou,
Z .
Malakasioti
d ifficult m oments T o
my
and
Th .
Makri
f or
t heir
i nvaluable
h elp
i n
o f m y w ork.
f riends
L ucy
G oodison
a nd
C arol
D 'Albiac
my
b iggest
t hanks
f or h elping m e w ith m y E nglish. To
t he
encouragement
m other V asso I o we
a nd
h elp o f
my f ather P loutarchos a nd my
e verything I h ave a chieved
s o f ar.
1 .
I NTRODUCTION: D espite
t he
t he
p ost-war
p rogress
p eriod
o f
a rchaeological
r esearch
c ertain g eographical
r egions
i n
G reece
r emained
u nexplored a s f ar a s t he p rehistoric s equence i s t he c ase f or most o f t he A egean i slands,
i s c oncerned . which a re o f
i mportance
w ith
b ecause
t hey
l ink
where a lso t he n eolithic r ecent
i nvestigations
Torrence, 1 982: t rial
i n
i s
E uboea
o nly
( Sampson,
i n
o ther
A egean
1 981),
i slands
s uch
T hat s till p articular
w estern A sia
f ragmentarily
k nown .
C yclades
2 4) a nd R hodes ( Sampson, 1 979: 4 3)
e xcavations
1 959B:
m ainland G reece
p eriod
d uring
l argely
M inor ,
A lthough
( Cherry
a nd
t ogether with o ld
a s
S kyros
( Theochares,
2 79) and C hios ( Hood, 1 981) o ffer a f air amount o f i nformation
a bout
t he n eolithic o ccupation i n t his p art o f Greece,
h eavily
d ependent
N othing
o n
s urface
s urveys,
u nstratified
s imilar t o t he S esklo c ulture o f
p ainted
p ottery
a nd
c omprehensive
t he i mpressive c ultures
r ange
a nd
we a re s till
mixed
m aterial .
t he mainland with i ts f ine
o f
n eolithic
o f A natolia - H acilar,
material,
o r
t o
C atal H üyük - h ad s o f ar
b een f ound. G eological r easons a nd environmental c onditions have p layed a n important r ole i n o ur p resent s tate o f k nowledge a bout t he Aegean i slands. T he r ise o f t he s ea l evel, d espite t he c ontroversy a bout i t i s
r ecognized a s
early
a nd
weathering e rosion t he
i t, o f
o f
t he t he
s eismogenic
g eological t he
main r eason f or t he s ubmersion o f
n eolithic
c onditions,
r educed
p reservation o f
t he
middle
f ew
s ites
n ature
t he g roup
o f
o f
t he
r esulted
f illed
i slands
j ust
o ff
o n
and
o r
l ess
t he
n orth p art
o f
a lteration
t he A egean h as
n orthern
c oast,
o f
b ecause
t oday. o f
t he
T he
d egree
d ramatic
t he i slands
T hessalian
t he
c onsiderable t he
I n a ddition ,
i n p rogress
e xploration o f
t he
t he
e specially
s till
many o f
s ettlements.
a ffected
e xist .
i n a more
t he
s ea
a nd
A egean,
s ettlements b y
i sland
t he
s till
a p rocess w hich i s
b een p artially
and
d eposits
which
o f
T he l ack o f n eolithic n ow
e ffect
material
c hanges
l andscape,
t he
c oastal
a nd
S porades,
e specially
b y
t he excavations o f Theochares ( 1969-71) ( 1970: 2 71) a nd myself ( 1981) o n t he i slet o f A gios P etros i n t he b ay o f t he i sland o f K yra-Panagia , t he
ancient
d istinctive p ainted
Halonnesos.
n eolithic
p ottery
t radition
a rchitectural r emains . t o
c orrespond
w ith
G reece - S esklo t o
t he
l ate
a nd
During
c ulture
w ere
- r ed
these
o n
c ream
I t
- r ich
e arly
a nd
m iddle
e arly
f igurine
o ther
c halcolithic
t he
o f a
f eatures
a
a nd
s ettlement s eem
c ultural o f
b y
material
p eriod
p eriod
material shows a c oncentration o f c ultural
r e mains
c haracterized
n eolithic
c entral G reece - while a nd
the
i s
T he main c ultural p hases o f
t he
n eolithic
years
r evealed .
o f
mainland
t raits
p oint
A natolia .
T he
f rom d ifferent
g eographical r egions, s omething which i s r emarkable c onsidering t he a pparently i solated p osition o f t he i sland i n t he A egean s ea . T his i s a n
a spect
o f
t he
" Agios
a ttention i n t he c ourse T he l ife
o f
f inds t he
f rom
t he
P etros o f
c ulture"
which
w ill
a ttract
o ur s pecial
t he m aterial s ynthesis.
s ite
s ettlement.
o f
A gios P etros
A d etailed
c over many a spects
d escription
o f
t he
o f
s ite,
t he t he
d evelopment o f t he e xcavation a nd t he s tratification e vidence w ill b e g iven i n s ections 2 a nd 3 , while t he a rchaeological f inds will b e d ealt with
i n
t he
f ourth
s ection .
T he
s ynthesis
will c onstitute t he f ifth s ection .
1
o f
t he
material
S ections 6 and
7 will
a s
a whole
i nclude a
d iscussion
o f
t he
" Agios
P etros
c ulture"
i n
r elation
t o
t he
g eographical a nd c hronological c ontext within which i t o perated,
b road n amely
t he G reek n eolithic ( section 6 ) a nd t he w estern A natolian s equence o f t he l ate 5 th and 5 th millennia ( section 7 ). The e ighth s ection d eals with t he p revailing p icture o f t he A egean n eolithic during t he s ame p eriod . A n a nalysis o f t he a nimal b ones a nd t he marine s hell r emains will
b e
i ndustry,
i ncluded
i n t he A ppendixes
t he r adiocarbon s amples,
a nd a n umber o f
o ther s tudies .
t he
t ogether with t he
T he p lates,
t he e nd.
2
c hipped s tone
geomorphological f igures a nd
observations
p lans f ollow a t
2 .
N ORTHERN S PORADES:
2 .1.
T he a rchipelago o f
t he n orthern S porades - G eneral
T he g roup o f n orthern o r T hessalian S porades Agios
P etros
b elongs
i s
s ituated
i n
t o which t he i slet o f
the
north
A egean
and
g eomorphologically must b e c onsidered a s a n e xtension o f t he M agnesian mass t o t he e ast a nd n orth e ast ( Plan I ) . I t c onsists o f t wo g roups o f i slands ( Plan I I). The f irst group i ncludes Skiathos, Halonnesos and Kyra Panagia, i n o ne o f whose b ays A gios s ituated.
The
d istances
o f
t hese
i slands
u ltimately f rom t he mainland a re n ot g reat: a nd
T hessaly
i ncludes a re
t o
6 km
S kyros;
f rom
i slands
G ioura
t o
a nd
s ome
o ne
X ero,
o ther
a nother
a nd
f rom 4 km b etween S kiathos
P sathoura.
s uch a s G ioura,
mostly u ninhabited;
f rom
S kopelos, P etros i s
The
s econd
P sathoura,
small
r ock
g roup
P iperi
i slets .
which
T he
d epth
o f t he s ea b etween t he i slands varies c onsiderably r anging f rom 3 0 m which i s t he H alonnesos
d epth
b etween
a nd K yra P anagia .
o nly f rom
t he T hessalian
S kyros a nd S kantzoura . i s
e asy
t he
b ecause
o f
mainland
A ll
c oast
a nd
S kiathos
t o
1 50
t he i slands a re e asily a ccessible n ot
b ut
a lso
f rom
t he
s outh
t hrough E uboea ,
C ommunication a mong t he u nits o f
t he
short
m b etween
s tretches
o f
s ea
t he main g roup
which
s eparate
t he
i slands, t he number o f r ocky i slets s cattered b etween t hem, t he s afe b ays which exist and t he whole f ormation and p osition o f t he i slands which a fford b oats
a c onstant
c over f rom t he p revailing l ocal n ortherly
w inds. The
c limate
a lthough
t he
o f
t he
winters
C ycladic i slands a nd b y
t he
a nd
p revailing
b y
t he
E uboea,
n orthern
s imilar
a nd
t han
t o
t hat
t hose
l ess d ry ,
o f
i n
t he
w inds
winter .
v egetation
c ommon
i n
A leppo
o f
t he
p ines
t he h ighlands
S porades
a griculture
i s
n ot
f ishing are
i slands .
d uring
I n
( Pinus
i s
s outherly t he
while
i n t he
S ome
s o w idespread,
p laying a more o ther
p erhaps w ith
and
t o
t he
t he i sland i ncludes
c ultivated a reas a nd A t
r ole
a l ong
a
a nd e vergreen o aks t he
t he p resent moment
b ecause o ther a ctivities
important
o ccupations
s ummer
c ontrast
r ich
h alepensis)
l ower f ertile valleys o live t rees a re grown . a s
c entral G reece more
f or t he i slands a re a ffected
n orth-eastern
winds
o f
t he
l ike t he n eighbouring mainland o f T hessaly a nd
t he
v ariety o f s pecies . a re v ery
i s
c ooler
s ummers
s outh-easterly
C yclades, a nd o f
a rea
a re
s uch
i n t he e conomy o f
t radition
l ike
t he
t he
s hip-
b uilding f or which t he i slanders h ad a good r eputation a re s teadily d eclining
i n t he
r ecent y ears
w ooden v essels a nd N evertheless, a ges
f or
i t
t heir
s hipyards e astward
o r i s
l ack o f
s eems
t hat
maritime
f or
n aval
u nchanged
t he
t heir
t he
S porades
importance s trategic
r oute .
t he
b ecause o f
A n
k eeping
a spect
o f
t he drop i n t he d emand f or
r aw material d ue were
e ither
a s
t o h eavy d eforestation . w ell
k nown
p roviding
t hrough
t imber
f or
t he t he
p osition c ommanding t he n orthward a nd o f
a nimals,
e conomic
l ife
which
h as
r emained
e specially c attle a nd g oats
p resence h as a lways b een f avoured b y t he g reen h ills a nd
t he
l ime
whose s tone
h eights. I n t he
S kiathos
t own
w estern
o f
s ide
S kopelos, i mportance
t he
p art
S kiathos h ave
on
o live
o f
t he
t he
t rees,
i sland
e astern
v ineyards
t he l argest o f t he main group, f or
a griculture:
t he
v alleys
3
which
s ide, a nd
i s
c ultivated
while f ruits .
t he I n
i s
h ills t he
a round o f
i sland
t he o f
two a reas a re o f p articular a round
t he
t own
o f
S kopelos
a nd
t he
h illy
a rea
i n
t he
v ariety o f v egetation i s t rees
a re
g rown
h illsides
and
H alonnesos
t he
a nd
water i s
i n
many
p ine
n orth
i s
a re
t he
s outh
d itterent .
s carce while t he l andscape
t he
i sland.
T he
p ears a nd
t ypical o f
T he
i s
o f
p lums,
V ines
c over
q uite
p art
v egetables,
p laces.
f orests
p icture
western
s triking :
o f
t he
i sland
d ominated
t he
l ower
i sland. h as
b y
c herry
n o
On
v alleys
i solated
h ills
a nd s mall r avines. B ecause o f t his, a nimal h erding a nd f ishing a re t he main o ccupations o f t he i nhabitants. F inally, S kyros, d espite i ts s ize,
i s
t he
i slands;
l east
s outh-eastern p ines,
p roductive
p art
e vergreen
o f
t he
i sland
o aks
a nd
s crub .
while f ishing p lays m inerals
l ike
t he
p rincipal
n orthern
S porades
while
t he
n orthern p art
P astoral
a ctivities
i s
a re
c overed b y
a lso
a s mall p art i n t he i sland's e conomy.
l ignite
m arble a re e xported 2 .2.
o f
f ruits, v ines and grain a re grown i n a l imited a rea i n t he
a s
w ell
a s
g ypsum,
o chre
a nd
most
l imited
H owever,
i mportantly,
i n c onsiderable q uantities.
G eology: T he g eomorphological
i s q uite well
k nown ;
c omposition
o f
i ndeed s ome o f
t he
t he
n orthern
i slands
S porades i slands
- S kiathos,
S kopelos,
Halonnesos - have b een t he s ubject o f t horough and s ystematic s tudy c oncerning 3 23;
t heir
g eology ,
K elepertzis,
g eneral
s tudies
( Philippson, l andscape
2 25;
written
1 959:
c hange
m ineralogy
1 974: 4 0)
about
a nd
the
t he
a lpine
a r econstruction
o f
t he
g eological
b e
According
S kiathos, b elong
S kopelos
t o
t he
Macedonian
a nd
s o
M ts .,
c alled
T hessaly,
1 977).
The
c entral
S porades
v arious
northern
Greece
o f
t he
h istory
n ature
a nd
P elagonian
r idge
most o f
t he
e xtended s ubmarine r idge which s tarts
t he
t o
o f
1 963),
a rea
c an
i slands
o f
t he mainland
i ncludes
t he C yclades a nd i t
The r est o f
t herefore
o f t he
c lose
which
d ynamics
( Aubouin ,
r econstruction
t he
W .
i s n oted
t he S porades - Halonnesos, t o
b elong
M acedonia a nd T hrace ( V . a re
o f
s tudies
1 973:
F rom
p hases
t his
A ttica ,
( Ferentinos,
2 98).
p ost-alpine
S kantzoura - a re c onsidered
which i ncludes
1 973:
which a re s ituated
t or b eing very s eismogenic . K yra P anagia ,
a nd
t o
S kyros
p etrology
geology
e specially
i n
a ttempted.
a nd
Melentis,
t ops
t o
t he V ardar r idge
J acobshagen - W . o f
t he
S kala,
mountains o f a n
f rom T hessaly a nd
c ontinues
i n a
n orth-easterly d irection t o t he n orth A egean b asin . S ome o ld s tudies o f t he s eismic b ehaviour o f t he n orthern A egean ( Ktenas, 1 927: 3 5) h ave s hown
t hat a v olcanic z one extends
E rythrea
i n A sia
Minor ,
o pposite
Thessalian Thebes ( Ktenas, O inoussae
a re
t he
t he i slands o f K tenas s uggests
t wo
t he
1 925:
e xtreme
f rom Thessalian Thebes i sland
o f
L esbos .
T he
t o north
v olcano
o f
5 7) and t he o ther n ear t he i sland o f
p oints
o f
a n
a ctive
z one
which
i ncludes
P sathoura a nd P sathouropoula n orth o f Kyra P anagia. t hat t he c reation o f t hese i slands h as a p ost-pliocene
date a nd d escribes
t he d eposits a s " andesite a ndesitique a ugirite a
o livine"; o ther n orth A egean v olcanoes i n L esbos, L emnos, Agios Efstratios, P sara, Antipsara, Emborio-Chios have t he same c haracteristic
l ava ,
t rue
g eological
t hat
t he
r ich
i n magnesium d evelopment
a nd o f
p otassium .
t he
S porades
H owever , i slands
i s
i t
i s
more
c omplicated b ecause i t i s c losely r elated w ith t he more g eneral h istory o t
t he
" Aegaeis"
a nd
t he
e arth
m ovements
a nd mainly p leistocene e ra r esulted ( Marinos, r egion o f b asin
which
i n
t he
i n t he s ubmersion o f
u pper
p leiocene
t he A egean s ea
S akellariou - Mane, S otiriadis, S apounzis 1 970). W hether t he t he S porades was s ubmerged a t t he s ame t ime a s t he Macedonian
d uring
t he
p leistocene
e ra
w ell
4
b efore
t he
a rea
o f
t he
s outhern
A egean
i s
o pen
t o
q uestion
( Fougares,
1 969).
H owever,
d espite
d ifferent p roposed t heories a s t o t he c haracter and extent o f c hanges t hat
( Cvijie,
during
s uffered
t hese
t he
1 911:
2 33;
J aranoff,
p ost-alpine
f rom s evere,
p eriod
1 937:
t he
2 03),
a rea
o f
t he
t he
e ither w idespread o r l ocal,
f act
t he
t hese
r emains
c entral
Aegean
t ectonic m ovements.
A nother f actor which h as a ffected t he g eological d evelopment o f i slands was t he v olcanic a ctivity o f t he a rea which r esulted i n
t he a ppearance i n ancient t imes - u pper Triassic - o f c ertain m ineralogical d eposits s uch a s p orphyry a nd a ndesites ( PapastamatiouMarinos,
1 938:
e ffects
o n
4 5);
t he
while nowadays
whole
pattern
o f
i t
l ife
h as more o bvious
o f
t he
l ertility a nd p rosperity o r d estruction a nd 8 7).
S till
vivid
in
the
me mory
o f
i slands.
e vacuation
the
a nd
I t
( Bintliff,
local
people
c atastrophic r esults o f t he r ecent s evere e arthquakes o f capital
o f
Halonnesos
a lterations o ccurred: small
i slands
c reating s mall
was
destroyed
d irect
c an b ring
c ompletely
1 977:
a re
the
1 966.
a nd
T he
g eological
v ertical r idges marked t he l andscape o f many
and a whole s ide o f a mountain c ollapsed i nto t he s ea r ocky i slets
I n g eneral
t he
b asis
i n t he n orth o f H alonnesos. o f
t he n orthern
S porades
c onstruction i s
metamorphic r ock which i n S kopelos i s o f p remesozoic date, H alonnesos a nd Kyra Panagia t his i s y ounger.
while i n
O n t his b asis t here a re
s ediment s equences o f Mesozoic a ge which a re s lightly metamorphic, h eavily
f olded
T able 1 ).
a nd
p artly
o f
s chist
( Jacobshagen a nd
d eposits o f marbles with c hert - H ornstein , marble
a nd
s chist,
d ark
p hyllites,
q uartzes
1 977:
2 37,
a lternating l ayers o f
a nd
l entiles
which a re marginally c hanged i nto g reen s chist; p articularly observed c oast.
S kala,
T he i sland o f Kyra Panagia i s c haracterized e specially b y
H owever,
i n t he
t he
l ayers
o f
2 .2.1.
T erra r ossa:
b ay b eneath t he Monastery
l argest
p art
o f
t he
i sland
l imestone d eposited a bove t hese s eries
D eposits
o f
t erra r ossa
o f
h ave
b een
f ound
o phiolite
s uch d eposits were i s
a t
t he
f ormed
( Kelepertzis,
i n
many
o f
e ast
b y h uge 1 974).
t he
S porades .
I n s ome p laces t hey a re a ssociated with a rchaeological r emains f rom d ifferent
p eriods
H alonnesos ( 1970:
( Plan
d eposits
2 76)
o f
t ogether
I II) .
A long
t erra r ossa with
t he
t he e astern c oast were
f ossilised
" prehistoric" t ools o f white f lint. M useum
o f V olos,
a re o f
i s o f
b y
b ones
S ome o f
M ousterian t ype
1 981) a nd t he r aw material
l ocated
o f
t he i sland o f
T heochares
o f
b ig
i n
mammals
1 969 a nd
t hese t ools, now i n t he
( Moundrea,
l ocal o rigin ;
o ral i t
c ommunication ,
i s very p robable
t hat i t c omes f rom a s ite c alled S partines o n t he e astern s ide o f t he i sland
from
( Theochares, f ound
o n
which 1 970) .
t he
h owever,
i slet
t he
other
o f
t erra
A gios
( position
I I
A ccording
i n P lan I II) j ust
t o h ave
t he
o f
- are
r eported
M ousterian t ype
c ampaign
o f
1 969
w ere
where,
b een e roded b ecause o f
t he
a small
s loping i sland
t he e astern c oast
o f Halonnesos,
g eological
i n g ood
layers
o rder.
h is r eport t he d eeper s ediments w ere f ollowed b y l imestone
d eposits a nd a t hick l ayer o f D espite
d uring
o ff
cores
t ools o f
F rom Kokkinokastro,
r eported a s equence
t o
- mainly
P etros
r ossa s eemed
w eathering c onditions. T heochares
finds
S imilar p alaeolithic
t erra r ossa,
2 - 2 .50 i n t hick.
t he f act t hat t he p roblem o f t he r ole a nd t he o rigin o f
5
t .e Older F ill
i n t he
Mediterranean a rea i s s till u nsettled,
t f eory o f V ita F inzi i s a ccepted ( 1969), b etween
t he
existence
crystalline p alaeolithic
o f
l imestone a rtifacts
t he
t here
l imestone
- the
t erra
( Bintliff,
d eposits
r ossa
1 977:
4 6) .
- e specially
and
I n
the
t hat
a nd
p leistocene
t he r emains
f irst
t ime
d eposit
c ontaining
o f a l ocal i ndustry i s
t hat
t he
A egean
b asin
c onfirm a human p resence a t S apiens
d id
s hallow
s tretches
many
ways
f ossilized
o ccupy
i slands
o f
r esembles
t hat
h as
( Cherry ,
o f
y ielded
w ere
o f
p alaeolithic
s eparated
1 979:
2 8) .
K okkinopilos
T his
o f
s eems
2 71) o f a n mammals I t
i s
f inds
e vidence f rom
i t
b ig
s ome s ignificance .
such a n early date,
which
water
o f
1 970:
b ones
t he
presence
r espect
t o me t hat the d iscovery i n Halonnesos ( Theochares, u pper
i f t he
may b e s ome r elation
t he
which
t hat
Homo
t he
m ainland
b y
s tone
i ndustry
i n
( Higgs - H ey,
1 964 :
1 99)
a nd
i t s eems c ertain t hat we have h ere a n exposure o f a c amp s ite o f t he middle p alaeolithic.
P erhaps more i nteresting i s
t he e xistence o f
Mousterian p ieces o n t he i slet o f A gios P etros and K yra P anagia a nd implications
o f
t hat
f or
s eafaring i n t he a rea . s ea
r each
dry
2 0,000
Appendix
which
a go,
makes
makes a s imple
t he
i sland
r ecent
u s
more
p ossibility o f a f looded p ossibility .
e ustatic
r e-examination
s trait
2 71)
f rom H alonnesos
c autious
a bout
t he
c hanges a nd p rimitive
A lthough T heochares ( 1970 :
s eparates
y ears
1 )
t he p roblem o t
o f
s tated
t he
t his
b efore Kyra P anagia
t hat
t he
s hould h ave
b een
e vidence
( see
c ontention . was
f irst
T he
o ccupied
f orm o f s eafaring p racticed b y p rimitive p eople a s trong I n
a ddition
t o
t hat
i t
i s
j ustifiable
t o
s peculate
t hat
t he r ock c aves which were o bserved 3 5 t o 4 0 m d eep i nto t he s ea s outh west
o f
t he
i slet
p alaeolithic
o f
t imes;
Agios
P etros
i n o ther words
c ontinuous o ccupation o f
c ould
o ne
c ould
have
b een
s uggest
t he a rea f rom p alaeolithic
o ccupied
t hat
t imes
i n
t here was a o nwards,
a nd
a s t he s ea l evel r ose s teadily, i n s ome p eriods a larmingly f ast, t he o ccupation was moving p rogressively o nto h igher g round s urviving
t oday
d ates
c ome
b ack t o t hese
2 .3.
N atural
Theochares
i t
o f
t he
n eolithic
s o
t hat
p eriod .
B ut
t he w e
s ite s hall
( see s ection 8 ).
f irst
o bserved
( 1970)
s omething
b ay a round A gios P etros
i s
which
was
l ater
a v ery s ecure n atural h arbour ;
shelter f or f ishing b oats and
I t
e very y ear,
l ater
t he
t he b ay o f Kyra P anagia and e specially t he n orth-east
p rovides
w eathers .
p roblems
t o
p osition:
r eaffirmed: c orner
b ack o nly
o ther
small
s hips
i n a ll
i s u nsafe o nly when t he s outh-wind b lows f or a f ew months
mainly i n A pril a nd
May .
I t
i s
p articularly
s afe
f rom
t he
n orth w est - maistros - a nd n orth e ast - t ramoundana - winds which b low a ll y ear a round a nd a lso t he meltemi wind i n t he s ummer . A ccording t o l ocal
f ishermen i t
i s
o ne o f
t he
t wo s afest
t he o ther b eing t he b ay o f P eristera,
h arbours i n t he w hole a rea ,
s outh o f
t he i sland
o f X ero.
The c urrent a round t he i slands o f t he S porades a s a round a ll t he A egean i slands i s s trong and unpredictable. I t c ombines t he l ocal c urrents
b etween
t he
i slands
with
t he
s urface
c urrent
which
r uns
t hrough t he B osphorus, t he s ea o f Marmara and t he Dardanelles i n a s outh-westerly d irection i nto t he A egean . F rom March t o N ovember t he northern winds L emnos
i n
b low with c onsiderable
a s outh-westerly
d irection
v elocity
while
a re l ess s trong d uring a utumn a nd w inter .
t he
S o i t
f rom
t he
i sland
s outh-running
o f
c urrents
s eems v ery l ikely t hat
t he bay o f Kyra P anagia a nd e specially i ts north-eastern c orner h as
6
a lways
b een a n important s helter f or b oats c rossing t he A egean i n a
n orth-bound o r west-bound d irection ( Mediterranean I n
g eneral
t he
r oute
( Izmir).
t o
S porades
a re
northern
s ituated
Greece
and
o n
n orth-east
c lose
S kopelou .
t o
O n t heir way t o
s outh-east
T he
s ea
o f
L ocal
t hirty y ears a go;
twenty
o r
t or
t he
i s
not
f ishermen ,
c hange .
f ishing
t rawlers o f
o r
o f
Anatolia
west
t he c oast
t he K aloyeri
h owever,
o f
S kyros
o f A sia M inor, r ocks which a re
r eported.
t he
d eep
i nvolving The
i nsist
t hat
i t
o nly
A lthough
S kopelos a nd H alonnesos were o f
t unny f ish,
was n ot
l ike
t hey b lame h eavy f ishing and s ea
D espite
a ctivity
Halonnesos.
movement
t o
p ass e ither e ast o f
waters
t he
u se
a round o f
c ollective
i t
i s
p robable
t he
l arge
e ffort
d uring October and N ovember when t unny f ish a ppear n orth
2 80).
m iddle
a round Kyra Panagia d oes not a ppear t o b e v ery r ich i n
t hat
o rganized
1 955:
t he
S kyros .
f ish n owadays . p ollution
i n
r oute
P sathoura ,
t he b oats u sually p ass s outh o f A ndros a nd s ituated
t he
t he b oats
o f P iperi a nd n orth o f
t hrough D iavlos
P ilot,
a c rossroads
O n t heir way t o n orthern G reece
S kyros, a nd
t he
i slands,
b oats
c an
b e
a nd s een
i n t he d eep s ea
t hat
t he
s traits
o f
t he p assageway f or t he s easonal s outhbound
n o actual evidence exists
t o
c onfirm
t his.
F ishermen d o n ot u sually t ravel l ong d istances t o o btain t heir d aily c atch . o f
U sing
a s
Halonnesos
a round t he
b ases
t he
i slands
4 h ours;
t he
small
s mall
f ishing
k arkia
( 5-6
p orts
a long
t he
e astern
m l ong) g o mainly
c oast
t o t he north
o f K yra P anagia a nd G ioura i nvolving a j ourney o f 3 -
s lightly
b igger
o f P sathoura where
b oats
g o
f ishing
f urther n orth
t he waters a re d eeper ( Plan V ) .
t o
t he
i sland
I n n either c ase
does t he expedition l ast more t han 2 -3 days d epending on t he weather a nd
t he
c atch .
c onstitutes
I t
t he
s hould
main
b e
a dded
f ishing
t hat
t his
g round
o f
n orthern g roup
t he
whole
o f
i slands
S porades
r egion .
Numbers o f b oats f rom a s f ar a s Volos, T rikkeri and S kyros h ead up t o t he
n orth e specially
d uring
t he
one the i sland o f Halonnesos. u nable
t o
d ocument
s outh o r north . c oming
f rom
a ny
o ther
s ummer
months
making
movements
o f
f ishermen o r
Undoubtedly t here a re s ome i solated
t he
s outh f or e xample
a ctivities
which ,
I t hink ,
i nterpreted ( Bintliff, t hink,
t o
u se
modern
i n a rchaeological
1 977:
1 2 0.
f ishing
b oats
b ase
I t
r outes
i n
i s
f rom
c ases o f
f rom E uboea a nd A ndros,
i ndicative o f a t raditional movement o f f ishermen , o f
a t emporary
D uring my survey i n t he S porades I was t he
b oats
b ut n othing
a n o rganized p attern
t erms
h as
b een wrongly
methodologically wrong,
I
o rder t o e stablish t he p ossible
movement o f f ishermen 7 ,000 y ears a go . Although t he r outes o f s ome m igratory f ish h ave n ot c hanged f rom p rehistoric t imes, t he c ultural implications
o f
t he
movement
o f
f ishermen
must
n ot
b e
o veremphasized .
F or s omeone who k nows
t he modern h istory o f t he a rea i t i s e vident t hat
t he A egean e xperienced
p eriods o f massive e xploitation o f
w ithout
t his
i slands .
O n
f act t he
h aving
c ontrary,
i nfluenced more
t he
d emographic
f undamental
s ea r esources
c haracter
t echnological
a nd
o f
t he
e conomic
i nnovations s uch a s t he i ntroduction o f c ertain t ypes o f s ailing b oats and t rading, d id a ffect t he p attern o f l ife i n t he Aegean i slands d uring
t he
E ven
l ast i f
f ew c enturies.
we
a ssume
f ishermen
i n
t he
d ifficult
t o
a ccept
f oundation o f f actors
which
t hat
Aegean t hat
i sland a rgue
i n
t here
were
p ursuit
o f
w ell
s uch a ctivities
s ites
a gainst
( Gamble, t hat
were
1 979:
a ssumption .
7
e stablished
subsistence 1 25). I f
m ovements
r esources
r esponsible There p eople
i t
f or
o f i s t he
a re
s everal
h ad
a cquired
t he
t echnological
s kill
f or
t ravelling
e xceptionally r ough s ea t o n avigate, f ishing.
t he A egean,
would
n ot
which i s
h ave
b een o nly
a n f or
A b roader motivation s uch a s t rade a nd c ommunication must
h ave i nitiated o f
i n
t his
t his k ind
o f
movement .
A lthough
t he
e vidence
i t - f or early o ccupation i n Melos d oes i ndicate,
R enfrew's
i nterpretation
( 1982:
2 22),
t hat
f ishing
- o r
l ack
i f o ne a ccepts t rips
a nd
e ven
r esource c ollection ( i.e. o bsidian) were n ot enough i n t hemselves t o l ead t o c olonization , s ort
o f
e conomic
s ettlements . f ood
i t i s d ifficult
i ncentive
was
F ishing f rom i ts
s ource
and
i t
was
t o a void
b ehind
n ature
r ather
main
i t
s eems
p reoccupation
c annot
s emi-permanent i s
h ighly i mprobable o f
a nd
i sland
s easonal
t he unavoidable
b e
a nd
t he
t he r esults
c oastal
c haracter
c onsequence o f
c onsidered o f
s ome
o f i sland
a s
a s table
e very d ay d iet. a re
not
a lways
t hat f ishing a ctivities w ere c ommunities .
o f
t he
i sland
Moreover ,
t he t he
s ettlements which
t he habitation p attern o f
f ishermen i s n ow d isputed b y t he e vidence 2 .3.1.
e stablishment
a s upplement
S ince t ime i s e ssential f or f ishing and r ewarding,
t he a ssumption t hat
t he
moving
f rom A gios P etros.
T oponymic q uestions:
There i s a great d eal o f c ontroversy a bout t he a ncient n ames o f t he
S porades .
p lace n ames
I t t o
whose a ncient s canty which
a nd s ome
H alonnesos
i s
v ery d ifficult
a ny o f n ame
t he
o f
P eparithos
m isleading . o f
t he
o n
s ome
i slands
E qually
i slands maps
b ear
t o
a ttribute
w e
k now ,
c onfusing
t he i s
two n ames .
a ppears
t he
w ith c ertainty .
a s
s urviving
E xcept
i nformation
t he
F or
p resent
i nstance
L iadromia o r
a ncient
f or S kopelos w e
h ave
s ituation t he
i sland
C helidromia .
i s i n o f
R emains
o f t he c lassical t own o f I kos have b een f ound o n t he i sland a nd s ome s cholars a re i nclined t o t hink t hat t his was t he a ncient n ame o f t he whole i sland .
S ome o ther s cholars
p resent
Kyra P anagia
m aps o f
t he l ast
On
1 6th
( Fick,
i dentify a ncient H alonnesos w ith t he
1 905).
I f
we
c entury
maps
t he
i sland
P elagnisi a nd t he p resent H alonnesos a s i n a F rench map o f 1 745 t he n ames h ave and
P elerisse.
H alonnesos
a nd
On
K yra
G reek
P anagia
I rresia;
a 1 828
P elagonisi
i dentifications a ncient
l ook a t
t he v arious
f ew c enturies w e r ealize t he extent
have
h istory
map
t he
= K yra
- P elagonisi
Kyra
maritime
t he p roblem.
Panagia
a ppears
a s
D romo ( map o f 1 575 A D) . L ater c hanged s lightly t o C helidromi
p resent
P anagia .
b een a ttempted a nd
o f
o f
I n
mainly
l iterature :
names
= H alonnesos;
t o
with names
L iadromia
P sathoura = E uthyra o r E udymia;
a ppear:
a ddition
G ioura
D romi
=
t hat,
o ther
k nown
f rom
- H alonnesos
= G erontia ;
= I kos; P iperi
=
S kantzoura = S kandyli.
2 .4. A gios P etros - T he n atural s etting: A gios P etros
i s a t iny i sland
1 50 m l ong a nd 7 0 m w ide w hose main
axis extends f rom north-east t o s outh-west ( Plan I V, P late 1 ).
I t i s
s ituated i nside t he b ay o f Kyra Panagia while a nother l arger i sland, c alled P elerissa o r P hagrou ,
l ies 7 00 m t o t he
o f A gios P etros i s 1 2 m above t he s ea l evel;
west .
T he h ighest
p oint
i ts n orthern s ide r ises
a lmost v ertically f rom t he s ea while t he s outh-west e nd f alls away v ery g ently ;
t he
s lope
i s
more
p ronounced
o n
t he
s outh-west
s ide
where
i t
f alls away a t a r ate o f a lmost 1 i n 6 . T he whole i sland i s v ery r ocky . P art o f i t h as a l ayer o f r ed e arth, 1 m t hick, b ut most o f i t i s c overed with s crub except t he a rea where t he excavation was c arried
8
o ut.
The earth d eposits a re small a s t he i sland i s e xposed t o s trong
n ortherly a nd
t he
w inds .
D espite
l ack o f
f resh
t he
s mall
water,
s ize
o f
t he
i sland,
wild r abbits manage
i ts
a lso a l imited number o f goats join t hem f or a short months
i n
t he
s ummer
a s
t hey a re
b eing p repared
i solation
t o s urvive o n i t;
f or
p eriod
o f
two
t ransportation
t o
o ther i slands. The l arger i sland o f Kyra P anagia c overs 2 8 s q. km a nd i s a lmost o val
i n s hape,
5 -8
km l ong and 4 -5 km wide.
Morphologically
c haracterized b y two main d eep a nd s afe b ays. t hat
which
c ontains
northern o ne, entrance.
t he
i slet
T he
east
a nd
s ides
i nto
t he
i slets.
e ast
c oast,
N ear
t he
b yzantine monastery b uilt
s tate
o f
t he
4 km
f rom
( Plate
i sland
2 )
a nd
i t
a re
t he
i naccessible
a nd a n umber o f
Agios
P etros,
l ies
i s a " metohi" o t
r ocky
a n
o ld
t he M onastery
T he whole i sland o f Kyra P anagia was b ought
t hat d ate a nd s ince
o f
P etros
s ea w ith d eep waters
i n 9 00 A D ;
o f M egisti L avra o f A thos . b y Megisti Lavra a t
Agios
i s
i s a l ong d eep b ay with a v ery n arrow
west
f alling v ertically
r eligious
o f
c alled P lanetes,
i t
The s outh-west o ne i s
A thos.
Traces
t hen i t
o f
l ate
h as
b elonged t o t he
r oman
and
b yzantine
o ccupation c an b e s een a ll o ver t he i sland:
c ist graves o f unknown
date
monastery,
and
t he
r emains
o f
t he
f irst
b yzantine
s acked
a nd
d estroyed b y p irates, a re w itness t o t he t roubled h istory o f t he a rea . E ven t hese d ays t he l ocal p eople a re a ccustomed t o s earching f or h idden t reasures b ecause n orthern v ery
i slands
a ctive
h istorians a llegedly
G ioura,
p irates o f
t he
b uilt
t he i sland
i t i s well k nown t hat K yra P anagia a nd e specially t he o f
b y
area
t o enable
p arts :
t he
t alk
i n K yra
t hem
a nd o f
P iperi t he
a bout
t hey w ere
s helter
c entury.
a wooden
P anagia
t rapped
p rovided
1 9th
t rack
c onnecting
t o t ransport t heir
t he
i sland
mountainous
b oats
which
t he
t wo
f rom
f or
Amateur
one
was
b ays
o f
bay
t o
t here.
o f
K yra
r ocky a rea
P anagia which
a long t he n orth-west and s outh-west
ridges
n arrow s tretches s ide o f o live
end
T he f auna - a nimals - e veryday l ife:
Morphologically two
t he
even
p irates
a nother a nd e scape w hen 2 .4.1.
P sathoura
until
o f
l ow-land
t he i sland ( Plate
t rees ( Appendix V I) .
which
3 ).
b e
c oast, t o
t he
s eparated o f
two
a nd two
s ix
i nto
p arallel
t he
two l ong
b ays
o n e ither
B oth a re c ultivated a nd c overed with
A ccording t o t he monk a nd a c ouple
p eople who l ive p ermanently o n t here a re a pproximately
r un d own
c an
c onsists
t he i sland
h undred
o live
t aking t rees
s ometimes r eaches t hree t housand k ilos.
c are o f a nd
t he
o f
o ther
t he l ivestock , o il
p roduction
T he r est o f t he i sland with
i ts r ocky g round - t he h ighest mountain r eaches 4 00 m - i s a n i deal p lace
f or t he
t wo
t housand g oats w hich a re i ts m ain o ccupants.
Their g reat number and t he i naccessibility o f many a reas o f t he i sland t hem, t he n o
h ave
c aused
s ome
p roblems
i n maintaining e ffective c ontrol o ver
e nsuring b alanced e xploitation o f
e conomic
p rosperity o f
r estrictions
f ew y ears a go f encing
o ff
t he
o n t he movement
i t was d ecided l arge
activities o f
a reas.
t he animals
t he f auna a nd
i nhabitants . o f
U ntil
t he a nimals a round
( c)
t he
t here
i sland
were b ut
a
t o s eparate t he whole i sland i nto p arts b y The
s o a s
a im
was
( a)
t o
c ontrol
t he
t o e conomize on p asture,
which i s e ssential when d ealing with s uch a n umber ; water r esources;
t hus s afeguarding
r ecently
( b)
t o
h erding
s omething a djust
t he
t o k eep t he l oss o f a nimals d own b ecause many
g oats u sed t o t urn wild which meant i t was impossible f or t hem t o b e c aught b e
a nd
a ble
was
s old ;
( d)
t o g ather
d ue.
I n
e nclosed p ractice
might t he
y ielded
b y
s ubmerged a nimals
o ther
p asture
a ccount
t o
b e
i s
a nd
The
s elling
c onstitutes H ow
imagine
i f
- goats,
t he
e conomic d airy
o ne
t ransporting
H alonnesos a nd S kopelos e specially d uring d eal o f
t he d airy a nd o il p roduce i s
N evertheless
t he p attern o f
t he
p roductivity
t o t he i sland . s u ficient
B ut
t o
t he
e lsewhere .
S o
t he
t he
t he
a rea
g rowing
g oats
i nto was t he
exploitation o f
t he
p roducts
o r
t he
g oats
t hey s ell t he
H owever, a g reat
b oat - k aiki b een l ike
- t o A thos . t his .
I n t he
t o a ccommodate more f amilies and b y
i ntroducing
b ecause t he
i ncreased n umber
was
t akes - which o f
s ummer .
t aken b y
s cheme f ailed
s ustain a n
h erbivores - n o g rass
o f
o f
t his
t o t he n earby i slands o f
l ife h as n ot a lways
early ' 70s t here were a ttempts i ncrease
t hem
a nd
t he
s ubsequently
o f
t o
b ack
s ection
t hemselves when t heir n umber i ncreases c onsiderably; a nimals i n b atches o f 3 0-50,
( e)
a k ind
f ar
s heep
u nderwater
t he
a reas ;
t he p regnancy p eriod
s cale.
t o
b ones
s ettlement. o f
c ultivated
i sland
e asy
p its
c onsists
f rom
a l arge
a nimal
e xcavated
n owadays
whole
o n
i t
o f
away
m ilking s eason o r
t he
g oats
t raced
n eolithic
t hem t he
words
f or
abundance t he
k eep
t hem when
s heep
h ad
r esumed
t o
c attle
l ocal p asture w as n ot
l ivestock ,
f ood
a nd
t o
e specially b e
t heir
b rought
d ominance
b ig f rom
o f
t he
i sland. I n f act,
a ccording t o t he monk and t he h istorical c atalogues o f
t he
monastery o f
f or
h undreds
s tock i s
o f
A thos,
g oats
y ears;
w ere
t he
o nly
i nhabitants
t his monk emphatically a sserts
i dentical with t hat o f
much earlier t imes
o f
t he
t hat
b ecause a great
number o f wild g oats e xisted o n t he i sland c ontinuously. w orthwhile n oting h ere
t hat a s pecial k ind o f
w ild
g oat
c onsiderable n umbers o n t he n earby i sland o f G ioura ; a r eddish s kin a nd
b ig h orns s imilar t o
A lthough p ollen a nalyses r econstruct
t he
environment ( Bintliff, valleys
o f
v egetation
r egional
was
p robably
1 977). t he d ue
h ave n ot
l andscape,
I t t he
was
l ower
s ea
f resh water ( see A ppendix 1 ). c overing
t he
whole
i sland
a ctivities t aking p lace.
o r
l evel
l ives
i n
i t i s a g oat with
b een c arried o ut t he
c limate
d rastically
greater
I t i s a lso
s till
t he C retan k ri-kri. t o e nable u s
a nd
t he
d ifferent
i s h owever c ertain t hat
i sland
t o
n ot
i sland
t he a nimal
f rom
t he extent o f
a nd
c orrespondingly
a nd
t he
g reater
t o
p hysical t oday
t he
two
r icher
i n
a vailability
o f
B ut we s hould n ot e xpect t hick f orests widespread
a gricultural
and
I n t he f irst p lace t he q uality o f
h erding t he s oil
c annot ever have a fforded a g reat p otential f or f arming and s econdly t he
n atural d ryness
o t
a ll
t he A egean i slands,
e specially
t he C yclades,
i s c haracteristic o f Kyra P anagia a s well, t hough t o a l esser extent. H owever, i t s hould b e s tressed t hat o ther i slands o f t he s ame g roup a nd s imilar
g eological
v egetation
e .g.
f ree-range g oat P anagia 1 981:
a s
i s
c haracteristics
S kiathos, must
t he
b e
c ase
S kopelos, b lamed
f or
a re
P iperi .
r icher T his
i n i s
t he p resent day
woodlands
n o
d oubt
p icture
t hat o f
and t he Kyra
i n many o ther Mediterranean a rea ( Thirgood,
6 8).
1 0
3 .
E XCAVATION:
3 .1.
T he d evelopment o f
t he e xcavation:
T he f irst a rchaeological v isit b ack t o A ugust t he
n orthern
1 969 a nd was
S porades.
p art
T he
t o
t he i sland o f A gios P etros d ates
o f a n e xtensive s urvey o f
i sland
was
v ery
r ich
i n
t his p art o f
s urface
f inds
a nd
b ecause o f t hat a t rial excavation was c onducted b y T heochares. s urface
material
i ncluded
s tone
o bjects
( axes,
t ools),
p ieces
o f
The white
f lint o f p alaeolithic character ( Mousterian), a g reat many obsidian f lakes ( including many b lades with r etouch) and s ome f igurines.
The
c eramic
b ases
a nd
s urvey c overed a ll
t he
r emains
s ome
p ainted
main
p art
i ncluded
p ieces
o f
t he
Minyan
f rom
s herds
c arinated
small
i sland
f rom v ases
s hapes.
apart
T he
f rom
t he
w ith
a rea
r ing with
t he
t hick
v egetation. T heochares o pened C utting T i,
6 m l ong a nd 4 m w ide,
western s ide o f t he i sland and a l ong c utting, a long
t he
w est
( Plan VI).
s ide
o f
Moreover,
t he t he
whole
T i
a rea
existence
o f
f or
o n t he s outh-
t he s o called TRENCH,
s tratigraphical
a c ircular
p urposes
s tructure
with a
c urved f oundation h ad b een noticed f rom v ery early o n, just s outh o f t hese
c uttings
( Plate 4 b).
During t he s econd p eriod o f e xcavations i n 1 970 s ix n ew s quares w ere o pened b y T heochares ; and
t he
o pen up a s where
t hree o f
t hem were d ug n orth
r est t o t he e ast o f t hese:
t he
l arge a n a rea a s d eposits
s eemed
1 -VI, ( Plate 4 a).
possible,
t o
b e
mainly
d eepest,
i n
t o
t he
o f
C utting T i
The a im was t o
t he
h ope
north and t hat
t he
e ast
o verall
p icture o f t he s ite with r egard t o t he a rchitectural r emains and t he s equence o f
t he
p ottery w ould
b ecome
c lear.
The o pening o f a l ong c utting, 1 0 m l ong a nd 2 .50 m wide, c alled was t he f ocus o f t he t hird y ear o f e xcavations on Agios Petros
MT,
c arried
o ut
d one
i n a ll
i nto
t he
m iddle
b y T heochares t he
a lready
h elladic
i n
1 971.
p reviously d ug e xisting p it
was
I n
s quares
p icture
o f
d iscovered
p arallel
s ome
i n o rder
t he
f urther
t o f it
s ite .
work
was
t he n ew e vidence
D uring
t his
c ampaign a
i n t he n orth-west
c orner o f
C utting
MT which r evealed many middle h elladic sherds a nd
numerous
animal
b ones. I n t he
s ummer o f
1 981 with t he p ermission o f t he E phoreia o f V olos
a small s cale excavation was carried o ut b y myself o rder
t o
p roblems t eam t he
r e-examine o f
h eaded
t he
t he
s tratigraphy
o f
t he
c ultural a nd p ottery s equence .
on t he
s ite
and
i sland i n
t he
r elated
Moreover, a n u nderwater
b y D r N F leming t ried t o a nswer c ertain p roblems c oncerning
g eomorphological
p osition
o f
t he
s ite
a nd
t o
e stablish
whether
o r
not t he s ubmerged p art o f t his e arly n eolithic s ettlement was s till r ecognizable . C harles
T he
S chwartz,
e xcavation who
had
t eam
i ncluded
a b one
a lready
examined
t he
s pecialist,
material
f rom
Mr t he
c ampaigns o f t he e arly ' 70s a nd n ow was a ttempting a more c areful s tudy o f
t he
o f
t he
s tratigraphic i sland
o f
o ccurrence
Kyra
P anagia
o f
t he n ew
was
done
f inds. i n
M eanwhile
o rder
t o
a s urvey
l ocate
more
prehistoric s ites i f any such existed. This proved to b e a d isappointing exercise s ince n o p rehistoric o ccupation was o bserved o n t he i sland.
1 1
My
f irst
i ntention
a rchaeological p art T o
o f
t he
s ite
b y
i sland
t he n orth
o f
where
1 971
I n
a nd
f ragments
t he
c oarse
T he d ig e nded
cm
t he
f rom
s urface
o f
t he
exact
s oundings
e arth s eemed
t here
was
n o
s ize
a long
t he
o f
t he
n orthern
p romisingly d eep .
c hance
4 m l ong a nd 3 m w ide,
t opsoil
l evels t he
Nothing
p ottery,
s herds .
o ut
more
d eposit
b ecause o f
p ottery .
o f
f ind
o f
making a ny
s evere e rosion a nd t he e xposed b edrock ( only a vailable b etween t he n atural r ock) . A c utting
t he s ettlement
obsidian
t o s ome
s ection
h owever o pened,
( Plan V I).
o utside
t he
T heochares 's
f inds b ecause o f t he p ockets o f e arth w ere c alled X was
was
making
i t
was
l ack o f
was
j ust n orth o f MT o f
o bvious
t hat
a ny k ind o f
f ound
a part
b roken a nimal
f rom
b ones
and
t he e xtent
o f
t he c utting .
were
v ery
small
a f ew Minyan
w ith t he a ppearance o f t he n atural
o ver
we
f inds s uch a s
b edrock,
A fter
t hat
0 .55
i t was
r easonable t o a ssume t hat t he s ettlement e nded a pproximately 1 0 m n orth o f
c utting MT ,
m .
while
t he d istance
f rom i ts s outhern c orner m easured 5 0
A s we s hall s ee l ater o n i n t he d iscussion o f t he actual s ize o f
the
s ettlement
observation, s ite
i n
t he
l ight
o f
t he
e vidence
f rom
t he
u nderwater
t hat d istance r epresents t he whole e astern e dge o f t he
( see s ection 5 .4). F rom
a ll
t his
e vidence
i t
b ecame
e vident
t hat
we
n eeded
t o
r estrict our e fforts t o t he a rea which was dug b y Theochares t o h ave any hope o f f inding an undisturbed s tratigraphical s equence, d eposit f rom
o f
t he
u nmixed
material
o riginal
e asy
t o
excavations.
r elate
F or
t o,
t his
( Plan V I) a long t he e astern f ace o f S q.
I I,
a nd
c ompare
a d eep
w ith ,
d ata
I chose t he a rea c alled Z 4 m l ong and 2 .50 m wide.
I ts a dvantages were t hat ( a) the d eposit l ooked q uite p romising, ( b) S q. I had a lready p roved undisturbed and r ich i n f inds, and ( c) i t was e asy
t o
make
p recise
s tratigraphical
o bservations
o f
t he
a rea p rior
d igging t he a ctual c utting b y s imply c learing i ts e xternal w hich f aced 3 .2
t he s ea a nd w as a lready c ut
T heochares' H ere w ill
r ocks o f
t he c oast.
e xcavation:
b e g iven a n a ccount o f
b ased o n t he r eports p rovided Theochares o pening o f
b y t he
t o
western f ace
t he f irst
e xcavations a t t he s ite
b y T heochares d uring t he d ig o f
1 969-71.
r ealized f rom t he o utset t he p roblems r aised b y t he
t he f irst
c uttings
o n t he s ite :
t he
d eposits
were
small
o r
non-existent, t he e rosion, e specially i n t he n orth-eastern p art, s evere. S ubsequently t he digging had t o b e v ery c areful i n o rder t o k eep a c lear s tratigraphical s equence. f irst o pened C utting T i
d ig o f
t he
f ormer
b ased
f ormation and
a rtificial
l evels
i nto
o n
c olour ( 15-20
S o h e d ecided t o d ivide t he
two p arts - T i
t he o f cm
s uccession t he
earth)
s pits) .
I n
o f
n orth a nd T i t he
while
n atural t he
a ddition
t o
s outh - a nd l evels,
l atter t his
was f or
t o
( change dug
i n
p urposes
o f b etter o bservation h e u sed t he l ong T RENCH , which was c ut a long t he western s ide o f t he T i a rea, d own t o t he b edrock . H e f ollowed t he s ame d igging
a rrangement
a ll o ver o f
t he
t he s ite,
the
s pits
0 .10
i dea o f
- 0 .15
m t hick
- more
f rom C utting T i
succession
s tratigraphy),
o f
the
b y r eference
t o
o r
l ess
t he s tratigraphical s uccession
l ayers h ad b een e stablished a lready f rom t he f irst
S tarting on
- t aking
a lthough s ome
c uttings.
a s equence o f s trata was f ormulated b ased natural
layers
t heir c omponents
1 2
o f
the
earth
( soil
a nd o ther f eatures
s uch
a s
t he
c olour.
r eported:
T hree
b asic
l ayers
i n a ddition t o
l ayer A w ith a l ight c olour ,
t he
t opsoil
l ayer B with d arker
were
c olour
a nd
C t he r ed e arth ( Plan V II). This o rder was r e—confirmed b y t he l ong TRENCH where t he t hree layers h ad t he same g eneral c haracteristics t hough
d iffering
s lightly
b ecause
o f
t he
r emains
o f
a shes
a nd
c arbonized m aterial .
T he s ame b asic t ripartite a rrangement o ccurred i n
a ll
w ith m inor v ariations
t he a reas o pened ,
s uch f eatures a s i solated X VI,
t hin l ayers o f p ebbles
h abitation a ctivities
X VII,
c onstant
X VIII,
a ttempt
X IXa).
t o
o r d isturbances d ue t o b urials ( Plan X V,
N evertheless
a chieve
c aused b y t he o ccurrence o f
which were a ssociated with
a p arallel
i t
s eems
t hat
i dentification
t here
was
b etween
a
n atural
l ayers a nd s pits i n o rder t o d efine c ultural phases and t he p ottery s equence
a s
w e
s hall
s ee
l ater
o n
( section 3 .3).
C utting T i i s r eported a s q uite r ich i n evidence c oncerning t he s tratigraphy a nd o f
t he p ottery s equence o f
t he s ite .
T he s loping s urface
t he a rea imposed s ome d ifficulties i n d etermining
l evel
b ut
i t
d id
n ot
s eem
t o h ave
t he s ituation a s a whole .
t he
a ffected d rastically
d epth o f t he
e ach
c larity o f
T he n atural b edrock was r eached a fter 0 .80 m
o f s oft e arth r ich i n p ottery and o ther t races o f h abitation s uch a s f ire
p laces
e xistence a ll over
and h ousehold
o f
a h ardened
s omething
t he excavated a rea b ut
architectural s light
implements.
c rust
f eatures
i ndications
o f
o f
t he
not
t he
s ize
I t
a lways
c utting a nd
i s
l ike a re
c haracter
worth mentioning
t he
a h ardpan which a ppeared a t
t he
p oor o f
s ame
a nd
t he
d epth .
The
t hey g ive
o nly
s tructures
( Plate
6 a). A c hild c utting;
b urial was
f ound i n t he t opsoil ( layer A ) l evels o f t he
i t had s tones o n i ts c hest and a lthough t he skeleton was i n
b ad c ondition ,
a f ew b ones were
a nd t he h ands ( Plate 1 0a). Theochares
c onsiders
i t
s till p reserved,
mainly f rom t he s kull
Although i t was f ound i n t opsoil l evels, a s
a n eolithic
b urial
( 1973:
c ontracted p osition i s c ertainly a n eolithic f eature. n eolithic
p ottery
was
r eported
t o
h ave
b een
f ound
3 42).
I ts
However,
with i t.
n o
S tone
h ousehold implements s uch a s g rinders and p estles were a lways f ound t ogether with a nimal b ones a nd p ieces o f o bsidian . l evels
a re
r eported
two
g rinders
( the
f irst
n ear
F rom t he t opsoil
t he
c hild
b urial
a nd
t he o ther c lose t o t he s outh f ace o f t he t rench), o ne p estle and many p ieces
o f
o bsidian ( two
p robably t he I n i n
s ome
small
c ores
a nd
a n umber
r emains o f a l ocal w orkshop a ccording
l ayer p laces
B ,
a f ew
without
s tones
a nd
i solated
r ocks
o f
u nworked
p ieces),
t o Theochares. w ere
f ound
a ny a rrangement o r p attern d espite
s cattered
t he p resence
o f t races o f b aked c lay which c ould h ave c ome f rom f allen mudbricks a nd o ther s tructures a ssociated with t he i nterior o f h ouses s uch a s t ire p laces,
o vens a nd p its
Layer
B ,
which i s
f ull o f a shes. r eported a s
c haracterized b y t wo c ircular f ire and b ), o vens a nd a shes ( c and d ). d ep C I-1 0 .10 m , V III).
t he
d iameter
I n t he l ower part
o f
c ontinuing under
t he h ardpan,
i s
p laces w ith t races o f b aked c lay ( a The d iameter o f a = 0 .56 m and t he
b = 0 .27
i n and
t he
d epth
0 .8
i n ( Plan
more f ire p laces and a shes were r eported;
the f ormer r ested on natural p ockets o n t he b edrock, characterized t he p eak p eriod o f t he s ettlement. c ircular p latform c onsisted o f s mall v ertically s et
1 3
which probably
I n o ne c ase t he s tones s urrounded
b y b eaten e arth . l evels 8 t o
Another,
1 0 s eemed
r esting o n l evel 1 1 b ut e xtending t hrough
t o h ave h ad a l ong
l ife.
A s econd b urial was f ound i n l ayer B .
I t was a c hristian b urial
w ith a n i ron d agger a nd m edallion , o bviously a l ater d isturbance ( Plate 1 0b). t he
T he
d isturbed
c utting More
a rea
was
l imited
a nd
i n t he n orth-western p art o f
( Plan X ). b y T heochares f rom
t he
e xcavation o f t he s o called TRENCH a long t he western s ide o f T i.
s igns
I n
t he s outh p art
o f h abitation were r eported
o f
t he
c utting a nd c lose
t o t he s canty r emains o f a wall
two h abitation f loors were f ound i n d ifferent p laces b ut i n t he same l ayer ( 8).
They were c alled t he " floor o f t he s nails" a nd t he " floor
o f t he p ainted sherds" b ecause o f t he abundance o f l and s nails o n t he f irst
a nd
p ainted
s herds
c arbonized material . mentioned
wall
o n
t he
s econd,
f ound
t ogether
w ith t races
h as
b een
e stablished .
r epresent an o pen c ourt.
T he
I t
s eems
s tratigraphic
more
l ikely
t hat
c orrespondence
t hey
a nd
t he
c ommon f eatures b etween T i and t he TRENCH cannot b e o verlooked: b oth
c uttings
t he
h abitation l evel .
s econd
T he
l ayer
r ole o f
must
b e
c onsidered
o f
s eparating
t wo
a s
t he h ardpan which a ppeared
o f t he s econd l ayer, i s d ifficult t o define; i mpression
o f
N o r elation b etween t he f loors a nd t he p reviously
t he
i n
main
i n t he m iddle
i t s ometimes g ives t he
h abitation p eriods
w ithin
t he
s ame
l ayer
( B). T he
c ircular
j ust mentioned, t he
arch
t o
c haracter , I t
i s
w ith
t he
d ate
wall
a nd
u nderstood d isturbed
p lan
s tructure
s howed
wall,
while
,
i ts
t hat
a nd a
e specially i n
( Plan
I Xa ,
P late 4 b)
s outh o f
t he
c uttings
with i ts impressive f orm a nd c onstruction - 4 .20 m f rom r aises
r elation
i t
a ppeared
m ixed
material
s tructure
t he
e astern
c ertain
t o
p roblems
o ther
o f
d ifferent
western g iving
t he
I ts
b ends
i mpression
i ts
f eatures.
e arth s urface
p eriods .
wall
t he
c oncerning
a rchitectural
i mmediately u nder
whose c orner
t he
g eneral
c onsiderably o f
a r etaining
t here were n o t races o f wall i n t he s outh-eastern p art.
T he s urface l evels
w ere r eported
t o
a l arge e xtent
t o
b e
d isturbed
a nd
t he only s igns o f h abitation were a g rinder f ound i nside t he wall i n t he western s ide o f t he s tructure and a l ot o f s hell r emains. N evertheless d igging was c arried o ut n ot o nly i nside t he s tructure b ut a lso
outside
excavated
i t
d own
i n t o
t he t he
u sual
way
b edrock
on
s tructure was f ound t o b e r esting .
u sing
s pits.
which
t he
F ive
b ase
I n l evel 4 ,
o f
l evels t he
h owever,
were
c ircular
two r ows o f
s tones which s eemed t o b e t he f oundations o f two smaller s tructures were
found
p robability h ave
b een
( Plan t hat
p arts
I Xb).
t he o f
I f
w est,
t his
n orth ,
a r etaining
i s
t he
c ase
t here
a nd s outh s ide o f wall
( Plate
7 a).
i s
a
s trong
t he b uilding m ight T here
was
a lso
an
a ttempt t o s earch t he a rea a round t he s tructure b y e xcavating 2 m t o t he e ast and 0 .50 m t o t he n orth . t o
t he
s tructure
a s
b elonging
C uriously enough T heochares r efers t o
h abitation p hase o f t he s ettlement, i t
i s a ccepted
o f
S q .
t hat
t he
i t w as f ounded o n t he
A massive wall r unning f rom e ast I b elongs
t o
t he
s quare
b earing
l ayer
( 8),
t he
main
b edrock.
t o west c overing t he whole width
t he f irst l ayer ( A ) a nd i s
k ind o f f oundation ( Plate 6 b) .
p arts o f
s econd
s omething which i s v ery u nlikely i f
l ikely t o
r epresent
s ome
C ircular o vens a ppeared i n d ifferent
t races
1 4
o f
b urnt
material
o ften a ssociated
with
s pecial
f eatures
s uch
a s
small
s lab-lined
massive wall a ppeared t he u pper s urface o f b elong
t o
t he
a rchitectural
o f b aked c lay, l evels,
l ayer ( C),
s ide o f
p hase
o f
p robably r emains o f
a reas.
U nder
l ayer
( B),
r elated a lso
mudbricks a nd
a shes .
I n
t o
t races
t he
l owest
t he natural b edrock a ppeared a ll o ver t he e astern
t he c utting.
A c ircular
h earth
( diam.
0 .62m)
c onsisting o f
b uilt c onstruction r ested d irectly o n t he a t hick
c arbonized
d eposit
( Plan
r ock ,
XlIb).
while
The
a sh without
a ny
o n
l ay
t op
l evels
i ncluded
a g reat
p ercentage
o f
well
p reserved
i ndications o f v arious h abitation a ctivities I n S q .
I I t he a rchitectural
c overing
t he
( B)
and
i t
was
western
s herds
f airly
a nd
p art
o f
t he
s ubstantial,
n orth s ide
c ourses d epending o n t he l evel o f
a rea
b etween S q. According
d eep . s ome
o f
t he
i s
b y t he p resence o f g rinders,
A c hristian b urial
was
a lso
r eported
f rom
t he
I a nd V I. t o
t he excavator,
a rchitectural
f rom
I t
I II a lthough
( Plate 8 b).
S q.
I II was d ug b y s pits,
T he d ig p rovided more c onclusive e vidence a bout
a ppeared
t he
The wall s urvived up t o t hree
t he g round
O ther h uman a ctivities w ere i ndicated t ools .
o f
b eing 0 .45 - 0 .50 m wide.
o nly a f ew t races o f i t s urvive t here.
b ones a nd
O ne
t he o ne
i t s eemed t o b elong t o t he s econd l ayer
a lso p robable t hat t he wall c ontinued i nto t he n ext S q.
a nimal
b e a nd
f eatures w ere much more s triking .
s ide
P lan X I);
t o
9 a,b).
o f t he b est p reserved walls o f t he whole excavated a rea was s quare ( Plate 7 b,
i t
t he d eposit
p ainted
( Plate 8 a,
o f
s eemed
u ndisturbed a ll t he way d own t o t he n atural b edrock and
f ound
t he
s tones which l ater p roved t o
t he
f irst
r emains layer
s uch a s
( A)
t he
( Plate
massive
5b).
I t
1 5-20 cm
t he c haracter o f s tructure
c onsisted
which
o f
two
l ines o f s tones which t ouched each o ther i n o ne c orner and s eparated t he
whole
square
into
I mmediately b elow t hat f ollowed
the
same
c oncentration o f b elow
i t
( Plate
two
parts
s tructure,
direction
s ling 5 a) .
s tones
T he
which,
a nd
d eeper
running
from
i n l ayer ( B),
north
to
south.
a wall was f ound which
when
removed,
revealed
a n e llipsoid f ireplace ( diam .
l evels,
l ayer
( C),
y ielded
a
0 .65 m )
o nly
t races
o f p arts o f earlier walls t ogether with s tone implements ( Plate 9a). S quare
I II w as v ery r ich i n p ottery a nd a rtifact r emains.
When
t he
C utting
was a n i mmediate n eed s ection while
w as
a ffected
MT b y
t he s outhern p art
s quares,
t he
was
o pened
t o d ivide i t
northern
d isturbances o f
t he
t wo p arts
o f
a l ater
o ther
p art
was
marked
b y
l ater i t
c uttings
b ecause
d ate
MT g ave t he s ame p icture a s
m iddle h elladic c oarse p ottery ; b ed a rea was
n orth o f
i nto
( bronze t he
a q uantity o f
b ecame c lear
i ts
t here
n orthern a ge) .
r est
o f
S o t he
Minyan a nd
t hat t he d istur-
l imited t o t he n orth-western p art o f t he c utting .
The
o nly a rchitectural f eature o f C utting MT c onsisted o f a n open s pace p aved with s labs, p erhaps a c ourt, f ound n ear a wall i n t he s outh e nd o f i t ( Plate 1 1b,
P lan X IIa).
The d epth o f t he c ourt was 0 .74-0.78 m
f rom t he s urface j ust under t he h ardpan; e arly p hase o f t op o f
i t.
t he s ettlement,
i t s eemed t o b elong t o t he
l ayer ( C) a nd h ad
t races o f
T he wall was i n v ery good c ondition .
mudbricks o n
Two c ourses o f t he
wall survived on t he e astern s ide a nd o ne course on t he western s ide ( the
f irst
c ourse
o f
s tones s its o n t he
1 5
r ock w ith a t hickness
o f
0 .45m)
( Plan X III).
I t
was
n ot
c lear whether t he masses o f
s tones,
which
a ppeared f rom t he surface l evels, was p art o f a s tructure o r not; c onsisted o f M ost
p robably
i t
B ecause
o f
r epresents t he
f allen r ubble
a ngle
o f
r esulting s evere erosion, existent.
p art o f
o f
s lope
r emains
S q.
v ery
t he
( Plan X IV). f rom
e ast
I V
b adly
a re
( spits
v ery
2 ,
p reserved
s canty .
3 )
f oundations:
while smaller r ocks were l ocated n earby. o ccupied t he middle a rea o f was
f oundations
a nd
t he
The a rea i n t he a n
f our
f ound
i n
r ocks
t he s outh-east c orner
I n S q. V ,
two l arge b locks
t he n orth a nd s outh s ides o f
was
i rregular
l arge
t he s quare a nd
t he n orth-east c orner .
S imilar
t he p icture i n S q . V I where, h owever , a more r ecognizable s tructure
- a r ow w as
o f
west
c ontained
f ormed an L -shaped a rrangement p ointing i nto
a t riangle
t o
s tratigraphy i n s quares I V, V , V I i s n on-
A rchitectural
s outh-east s cattering
i t
s tones o f ' varying d imensions w ith much e arth b etween t hem.
o f
f ound
v ertically
p laced
s labs
t ogether w ith a m ass o f
The g eneral
p icture
o f
0 .22 - 0 .29 m h igh a nd 0 .6 m t hick -
p ebbles
t he
( Plate
1 1a).
a rea excavated b y T heochares which
c overed 1 76 s q. meters d oes n ot p resent u s with any c oherent s et o f architectural r emains. I t i s t herefore n ot p ossible t o s ay a nything about what c an b e gleaned f rom s ome c onstructional d etails f rom t he small
s urviving
p arts
o f
a rchitectural r emains c an h uman a ctivity a s 3 .,.
walls.
p rovide
N evertheless u seful
t hese
i nformation
f ragmentary
c oncerning
t he
t he s ite when c ombined w ith t he r est o f t he e vidence .
T he s tratigraphy o f A gios P etros: I n t he f ollowing s ections t he s tratigraphy o f t he s ite b ased o n
t he r eports o f T heochares will l ight o f
t he n ew e vidence .
c haracteristics
a nd
t he
b e d iscussed a nd
r epresentative
f inds
s trata t ogether w ith t he m aterial f rom t he
was
t hen r e-examined i n t he
I n a ddition a n a ccount w ill b e g iven o f which
1 981
d efine
e ach
o f
t he t he
e xcavations.
F rom a ll the evidence available f rom Theochares' excavations i t possible to r each some f irm c onclusions concerning the
s tratigraphic d ivisions P etros . o f the
d istribution ware,
a nd
c ultural
p hases
T hese d ivisions w ere b ased mainly c uttings opened in conj unction o f
c ertain
c eramic
f eatures
s pecific p ottery s hapes and
o f
t he
s ettlement
o f A gios
u pon t he s oil s tratigraphy with the s tratigraphic
l ike
t he
r ed o n c ream p ainted
t he a rchitectural and h abitation
f eatures a s t hey were e xemplified i n C utting T i, T RENCH, S q. I , I I, I II a nd C utting MT . I t was n ot p ossible, h owever , t o i nclude S q . I V, V a nd VI i n c onstructing d eposits. f rom
c utting
s loping
t o
b road f ramework b ecause o f
o f
s poradically
and
the i n
t heir d isturbed
T heir t hickness varies
c utting o r even within t he s ame o ne b ecause o f
surface
sections
t hat
Three s trata were d istinguished. t he
d ifferent
excavated
t he
middle
o f
area.
degree
o f
Other
a s tratum
e rosion
features
i n s ome
a reas,
i n
t he
d ifferent
which
appear
s uch a s
l ayers
o f p ebbles, o r more o ften t he s o c alled h ardpan, d o n ot s eem t o mark any s ignificant division within t he s tratum i tself. The number o f l evels w hich c orrespond
t o e ach s tratum c an b e
1 6
s een i n P lan X XII.
S tratum I .
( Theochares'
l ayer C ).
This r epresents t he l owest l evel r evealed b y t he e xcavation a nd r ests
o n
t he
t hickness
o f
natural t he
b edrock .
d eposit
a nd
I ts
t he
l imits a re n ot e asily d efined . which
i n
s trong o f
s ome
p laces
d epth
s lope
o f
I n g eneral,
a ppears
b lackened
o vens
o r t he b urning o f
f inds e specially i n a reas r ock where h owever, c rust .
T he
phase
c eramic
which
f ire
a nd
while
I h as
t he s oil i s d ue
f ireplaces
a nd
c olour
t here t o
i n
t he
u pper
a r ed
I t
h ollows
t o
i ts
a shes;
t he wooden r oots o f h uts.
a round
i s
a
t he a ction i s
r ich i n
t he
n atural
t he p ottery a ppears t o h ave a s urface c overed b y f inds
must
a ccording
b edrock
S tratum
b y
p ossibility t hat t he r ed c olour o f
varies
t he
a re
a bundant
r epresent
s ettlement, a t erminus
t he
a dquem.
a nd
v ery
f irst
c haracteristic
o ccupation
o f
p eriod
t he
o f
Early neolithic monochrome,
t he
b lack-
t opped and p ainted wares were f ound i n t he l ower p art o f t he s tratum while
i n
t he
u pper
s ection
middle
n eolithic
p ainted
p ottery
a ppeared
( Fig 1 -2).
A t hin l evel o f
s and l ying immediately u pon t he
b edrock
r epresents
t he
surface.
a rea
C utting
MT,
o ld
g round
t races
o f
habitation
A part f loors
f rom
a re
t he
paved
l acking
a lthough
i n t he
s poradic o ccurrence o f t he h ardpan s ome t imes g ives s uch a n impression ; h ere I r efer
t o t he s econd l ayer o f h ardpan which o ccurs w ell b elow t he
main one b elonging t o t he s econd s tratum. n atural
h ollows
i n
t he
b edrock
w ere
I t
i s a lso a pparent
e xtensively u sed
d uring
t hat
t he
f irst
phase o f t he s ettlement f or a number o f activities ( fire and c ooking p laces, l ater
b urial s pots) . o n
t ogether
s ettlement
a nd
S tratum I I. T his
T he n ature o f
with
t he
t he n ature o f
( Theochares'
i s
a p ure
t hese p ractices will b e
p roblem
o f
t he
c haracter
o f
d iscussed t he
f irst
t he s ite a s a whole.
l ayer B ).
h abitation
l evel a ll
o ver
t he
e xcavated
a rea .
T he
c olour o f t he s oil i s l ight b rown t o a shy a nd a l ot o f well p reserved sherds were f ound i n i t. most
o f
t he
t hough n ot
The p resence o f t he h ardpan i s o bserved i n
c uttings where i t
o ver
t he
o ccurs i n t he middle
whole s urface,
d ividing i t
i nto
o f
t he
s tratum,
t wo p arts,
HA a nd
I IB which, h owever, d o not show any s ignificant d ifference f rom o ne a nother . b elow
T here
p ottery
s tyle .
c onstitute g eneral,
a nd t he
s uccessive f ireplaces,
M iddle
n eolithic
S tratum I I a ppeared
f eatures
e qual
p ainted
t he c eramic r epertoire o f
e xcavated a rea , b asic
i s a lmost a c ontinuation o f
t he h ardpan :
f ire
d istribution
abundance
o f
i n
c lay
f eatures a bove a nd
p ottery a nd
t he s tratum
monochrome
( Fig 3 -8,
a nd
a ll
a nd t he T RENCH .
c ooking p laces s eem t o
t he
c uttings
f igurines
a nd
o pened .
animal
wares
1 0).
b etter d efined i n t he s outhern p art
e specially i n C utting T i s uch a s
t he s ame
o vens a nd b asically t he s ame I n
o f
H owever,
t he s ome
h ave widespread
C haracteristic
b ones
which
i s
i s not
surprising c onsidering t hat S tratum I I r epresents t he main c ultural p hase o f
t he s ettlement .
T he a shy c olour o f
an extensive u se o f f ire, s ay. t he
inhabitants
f or
open
s paces,
r eflects t o
p erhaps
B oth f loors,
i n
t he
e veryday
where
p ainted
s herds"
c ooking
s erved
c ombined with t races o f a shes,
impression o f o pen s paces where c ourt
c ourts,
i t i s p ossible t hat s ome o f t he f loors
t he " floor o f s nails" and " floor o f
s ame p urpose. open
p robably
C ertainly t here a re i ndications o f a p reference on t he p art o f
activities were c arried o ut; l ike
t he s oil
whether d eliberate o r not i s d ifficult
t he c ooking was
l ife
1 7
o f
d one .
T he
r ole
t he n eolithic v illage
t he
g ive t he o f
h as
t he b een
r ecently r estated ( Theochares, 1 980: 1 2). Most o f t he a ctivities ( cooking, weaving, p ottery making) were c arried o ut i n t he c ourt o f each h ouse e specially d uring t he s ummer t ime. o utside
t he
h ouse
while
o nly
s mall
f urnaces
The o ven was a lways
a nd
f ireplaces
were
f ound
i nside.
T he s ame a rrangement c an b e s een t oday i n c ontemporary h uts
o utside
Larisa
activities
o f
where t he
t he
open
c ourts
i nhabitants.
S o,
a re
t he
f ocus
a d istinction
o f
t he
main
b e
made
s hould
b etween t he f ireplaces which were u sed mainly f or h eating purposes inside
t he
h ouses
and
t he
s tructures
which
c ontained
material ( cooking p laces) and were s ituated o utside. A gios P etros The s canty .
c arbonized
I n t he c ase o f
t he c ooking p laces a re e xtremely r ich i n m aterial r emains.
a rchitectural A ccording
t o
f eatures
t he
o f
t he
s tratum
e xcavation r eports
t he
c oncerned c ircular
a re
v ery
s tructure
i s
the only b uilding which has a c lear c ut p lan b ut t his i s u nlikely t o b elong
t o t he s econd s tratum a s we h ave a lready a rgued .
s tructures, areas, west,
p ossibly
walls
o f
h ouses,
h ave
b een
P arts o f o ther
r eported
f rom
o ther
s uch a s t he l ine o f s tones f ound i n S q. I running f rom east t o whose c learance r evealed p lenty o f
p ainted s herds and animal
b ones ( Plate 6 b), a nd t he well d efined s tructure which a ppeared i n t he west s ide o f S q. I I p ossibly c ontinuing i nto t he next s quare ( Plate 7 b). S tratum I II.
( Theochares'
l ayer A ).
This i s b est d efined i n T i and t he TRENCH where i t extends f rom 0 .20 m above t he hardpan t o t he t opsoil l evels. c olour,
I t h as a l ight b rown
t he s oil i s s ott a nd v ery r ich i n p ottery and f igurines.
T he
middle neolithic p ainted p ottery and monochrome wares c ontinued occur
well i nside t he s tratum.
neolithic p ieces
s tarted
H owever,
t o a ppear ( Fig. 9 ,
9 a,
1 1,
1 2).
I n g eneral
t he o verall a rchitectural p icture o f S tratum I II i s p oor. p arts and
o f
walls
p roviding
a ppeared
s cattered
l ittle e vidence
w ithout a ny
f or
t heir
t o
i n i ts upper s ection l ate
c onnection
f unction .
I solated
b etween
I n T i
t hem
a mass
o f
s tones and a l arge grinder were found n ear t he north-eastern c orner while a well-constructed c ircular s tructure ( diam: 0 .28 m ) appeared n ear s et
i ts
s outh
s tones
f ace ;
p laced
t he
r ound
l atter
b eaten
material were f ound a ll o ver t he with b urnt b ones, t hat
i n
o ne
i s
c haracterized
e arth . n orth
s pot,
n ear
a shes
s ection
o f
t he
t he
b urial ;
t he
t rench a s mall a rea
t he
s keleton
l ay
was
c lose
t o
t he
which e xisted
c an b e
r unning
f rom
west
p ossibly
t he
most
s een i n t he
t o
e ast;
c ommonly
t ogether
c orner,
f ive
C lose t o t he n orth
b ecause
s eparation
o f
l ine
t he
c hristian
b etween T i
a nd
T races o f t he k ind o f s tructure
t hree s mall walls
p is
c arbonized
c utting
s outh-eastern
d isturbed
S q. I and i t was b ased on S tratum I I.
v ertically
a nd
i t i s worth mentioning
f igurines were f ound t ogether ( see s ection 4 .2). f ace o f
small
o f
s ea s hells a nd f igurines;
p articular
b y
T races
6o r
mudbricks
u sed
material .
wood was u sed f or c onstructional
p urposes ;
I t
f ound i n t he TRENCH without
a lso
s eems
c haracteristic
s traw
was
l ikely
t hat
i s
a shy
t he
colour e specially i n t he l ower s tratum o f t he s ite a nd t he p ostholes which
were
p articularly
observable
i n
S tratum
I ,
a ccording
t o
t he
e xcavator . T his i s n ot s urprising i n v iew o f t he f act t hat t he a rea o f t he northern S porades was and s till i s, r ich i n woodlands. Another interesting a spect i s t he existence o f many f ireplaces and o vens a t s ome
d istance
f rom
walls
and
o ther
1 8
a rchitectural
f eatures.
I t
i s
p ossible t hat t hey d efine o pen a reas a nd c ourts, which a s
t he
c entre
o n a bove a nd
h as
a s
There
S esklo.
widespread
o f
c ommunal
b een o bserved a re
n o
r ebuilding
a ctivities
t he s ignificance o f
a lready
b een
c ommented
i n o ther n eolithic T hessalian s ites
s igns o f
h as
o f
the
d estruction
o r
s ettlement.
f ire
o r
H owever,
t he
t here
a re
i ndications o f a rchitectural a lterations w ithin t he s ame s tratum, t he c ase with S tratum
I i n T i;
b ut
s uch
o f
a gain t heir e xtent a re n ot
a s
i s
c lear .
The n orth-western s ection o f MT b ecause o f i ts extended middle h elladic d isturbance was examined s eparately and l ater d efined a s a r ubbish p it . c orner o f
I t c overed a s pace
MT a nd
1 .60 m l ong f rom
r eached a d epth o f
t he north-western
1 .15 m f rom t he s urface .
c onsisted mainly o f a nimal b ones a nd p ottery s herds, w hich w ere o f m iddle h elladic d ate
T he f inds
a g reat d eal o f
( Minyan a nd c oarse w are).
T he t opsoil l evels a ll o ver t he s ite were r epresented b y a d eposit o f
0 .20
a lmost
m a nd
t hey
l acking
p attern .
w ere
a part
A ccording t o
a h abitation o bsidian
l evel
f lakes
i n
mostly
f rom
d isturbed .
s cattered
t he e xcavator
a t
a ll
which
i t was n ot
d espite
s ome o f
A rchitectural
s tones t he
p ossible
p resence
t he c uttings ( Ti
r emains
a ppeared o f
were
without
a ny
t o d istinguish
b one
t ools
n orth s ection).
a nd
I n g eneral
t he t opsoil was p articularly r ich i n a nimal b ones a nd o bsidian d espite t he f act t hat i t was e xposed t o c onsiderable e rosion a nd s uffered f rom t he
e ffects
o f
t he
w ind
a nd
t he
s ea .
T he
p ottery
r emains
were
mixed :
l ate neolithic p ieces were t ound t ogether with e arly b ronze s herds. ( Fig.
1 1:
2 ).
Little c an b e s aid a bout t he c onstructional methods employed i n Agios P etros mainly b ecause o f t he c ondition o f t he surviving s tructures.
S ince
i ntentionally
l aid
i t
i s
n ot
t here
a lways
were
c lear t hat a r ow o f
d ifficulties
i n
s tones was
d istinguishing
a
s tructure f rom s urviving o f t he
a mass o f f allen s tones. The walls a lso v aries d ue t o t he b ad
number o f c ourses p reservation o r t he
s loping
a s
s tructure
s urface,
n umber o f c ourses o f
i s
t he
c ase
in t he western f ace o f S q. with an a verage width o f s urviving
walls
w ith
s tones i ncreases
s ometimes
t he
c ircular
where
t o t he west ( Plan I Xb) .
t he
T he wall
I I s urvives t o a h eight o f t hree c ourses 0 .45 i n ( Plate 8b). The h eight o f t he r eaches 0 .40 m a s
i n t he c ase o f S q.
I II
( Plate 5 ). 3 .3.1.
E xcavation o f
1 981:
The main p urpose o f t he e xcavation i n t he s ummer o f 1 981 on t he i sland t he
o f
s ite
A gios
P etros
r eported
b y
was
t o
r eexamine
Theochares,
t o
t he
s tratigraphic
o bserve
more
s equence
c arefully
o ccurrence a nd d istribution o f c ertain c eramic f eatures a nd a t t ime
t o u ncover
s ome more a rchaeological e vidence .
c learing v ertically
t he
e xternal
exposing t he s uccession o f
w estern
f ace
o f
T hus
o f t he
t he s ame
w e s tarted b y
C utting
Z ,
4 i n l ong,
t he l ayers and e stablishing a c lear s oil
s tratigraphy ( Plan X IXa). The
d ig
was
c arried
out
b y
t aking
o ff
t he
s pits e ach f rom t he s urface d own t o t he b edrock ; depth o f 1 .20 cm a bove t he s urface.
s oil
i n
2 0
t he d eposit
cm t hick r eached a
S even l evels were d efined which
p roved t o b elong t o f our d ifferent s oil s trata i ncluding t he t opsoil
1 9
( Plate
1 2,
P lan X IXb).
mixed d eposits. external
f ace
T here
were
n o
s igns
o f
d isturbed a reas
and
The s tudy o f t he material f rom t he c learance o f t he o f
C utting
Z ,
a lthough
n ot
v ery
l arge
i n
q uantity
( predictably i n v iew o f t he small s ize o f t he e xcavated a rea) s howed t he
s ame
t hat
v ertical
r eported
c oarse
b y
p ieces
d istribution o f Theochares.
w ere
f ound
I n
c haracteristic c eramic f eatures a s
t he
t ogether
t opsoil
with M inyan
c eramics p robably o f l ate n eolithic d ate. b eginning o f
l evel 4 ,
( levels s herds
1 ,
a nd
2 ,
3 )
s ome
v ery
i ncised
B y t he end o f l evel 3 and
t he f irst c arinated s hapes a ppeared ;
t hey d o n ot
b ear any f orm o f d ecoration and t he c arination i s s ituated a lmost i n t he
middle
o f
A gios P etros r ing
b ases
t he s ide o f
t he vase,
c arination a nd
o f
i s
s mall v ases a re
s lightly e verted r ims .
most
which d iffers
l ikely o f
f ound
f rom t he
a l ater
d ate .
t ypical
P ieces
t ogether with s herds o f
b owls
o f
w ith
T he s traight s ided v ases a re n ow c ommon a nd t he
h igh n ecked j ars a re m ore f requent. Levels
5 ,
6 and
7 are
r emains s uch a s l adles, there
i s
a s teady
d ecrease
mentioning
t hat
t he
above
r ock
were
t he
r icher
i n
i n
n atural
t he
p ockets
extremely
S ince t otal
we
d epth
quickly; t he
h ad
C utting
i n
r ich
t he i n
a lready e stablished
Z i tself .
o f
t he
S ome
d eposit
b edrock
p ainted
l evel t he
e ight
was
and
a nd animal
o ther
a nd
I t i s worth
t he
l evel
s herds.
S igns
j ust o f
s oil
s tratigraphy w e s tarted
were
cm.
The
u ncovered t opsoil
while
was
t he
c leared
i t p roduced o nly c oarse p ieces a nd f ew i ncised p ieces.
f ollowing
i nteresting:
l evels
5 and 6 t he
a
( Plan X IXb).
l evels
1 .30
material
b ones a lthough
amount o f o bsidian .
p ossible wall w ere f ound i n t he d eepest
d igging
c eramics
s tone implements
a rchitectural
a c urved wall was r evealed ( ki0),
f eatures
0 .45 m wide
I n
were v ery a nd
2 .20
m
l ong, p robably p art o f a c ircular s tructure t he r est o f which h as not s urvived ( Plate 1 3a, P lan XXb, r eddish i n c olour ,
c ).
The a rea e ast o f t he c urved wall,
was p oor i n material r emains a nd p robably r epresents
the virgin s oil s urrounding t he external p erimeter o f s tructure .
I n
c ontrast
t he
d eposit
o f
i ts
w estern
t he
p art,
c ircular
p robably
t he
i nner s ection o f t he b uilding, c ontained a l ot o f s herds, a nimal b ones and s eashells. The p ottery c onsisted o f r ed monochrome wares with s trong b owls
t races o f while
c reamy s lip,
p ainted
motifs o n a c reamy n ext
l evel
7 e ast
p ieces
d ecoration makes
b ackground . o f
A n
t he wall k :
f rom i ts
c ollared j ars f irst
i nteresting a l ot
a nd
a ppearance f eature
c arinated
w ith
a ppeared
o f f allen s tones
l inear i n
t he
t ogether w ith
a nimal b ones, s eashells, and g rinders s tratum". ( Plan XXc, P late 1 3b). I ts
c reating a r ich " compacted p ottery h ad t ypical middle
n eolithic
c ollared
a ppearance
with
h igh
c arinated v ases a nd a n umber o f
n ecked
c lay l adles .
t he " compacted s tratum" were a small a xe
jars,
O ther f inds
d eep
b owls,
r evealed f rom
made f rom a d eep b rown s tone,
f our g rinders, b lades o f o bsidian and p ieces o f worked f lint.
I n t he
same area a human jaw was f ound n ear a r ock ( Plate 1 5b, marked b y an a rrow). R egarding s tructure o f
t he
r elation o f
l evel 6 ,
i t
i s
t he
p ossible
" compacted t hat
s tratum"
t he f ormer i s
t o
t he
c ircular
t he d estruction
l evel which p receded t he c onstruction o f t he wall k within t he s ame cultural
period
p ersistence
o f
since
p ainted
there
s herds
i s
with
a nd s hapes.
20
hardly t he
any
change
t ypical A gios
of
pottery:
P etros d ecoration
The deepest p ainted
l evel,
sherds;
c ombination o f p laced n ear
8 ,
l inear:
t he
1 .20 m u nder t he s urface was v ery r ich i n
d ecoration
their
a nd wavy
r im o f
jars,
c overed
l ines,
n et
a
variety
p attern d esigns.
i ncluded a v ery f ew obsidian p ieces,
o f
motifs:
s olid h anging t riangles a nd The
o ther
two c ores o f f lint,
f igurine and s ome c lay l adles ( Plate 1 4a).
f inds
o ne a nimal
Two i nteresting f eatures
were r evealed i n t he n orthern s ection o t t he c utting : a h earth , 0 .45 m w ide, r esting i n a n atural p ocket o n t he b edrock a nd a h abitation f loor a t t he s ame d epth n ear i t f ull o f p ottery s herds, a nimal b ones, axes, g rinders, most o f t hem i n s itu ( Plan XXIa, P late 1 4b, c ). t o
t he s outh o f
b edrock ;
i t
t he f ireplace a n eolithic
was a c hild b urial i n a c ontracted p osition .
t he a nthropologist months
S ome 0 .30 m
b urial was f ound b ased o n t he
o ld.
T hus
( Plate 1 5a);
A ccording t o
t he r emains were t hose o f a b aby n ot more t han a f ew t he
p reservation o f
t he s kull was missing,
g ain a f air p icture o f
t he
b ones
was
not
v ery
good
t he r ibs were i ntact a nd we c an
t he way t he c hild was b uried .
The h earth was e ither d ug d eep i nto t he b edrock o r more l ikely a h ollow o f t he n atural r ock was u sed f or t hat p urpose . i n
c arbonized
material,
a nimal
b ones,
p ainted) s ome b lackened b y t he f ire ; mixed
within
t he
b urnt
d eposit
p ottery
I t
s herds
s ome h uman b ones
b elonging
t o
a nother
was v ery r ich
( monochrome were
a lso
i ndividual .
a nd
f ound T here
a re no s igns o f c remation a nd t he o ccurrence o f t he b ones i nside t he f ireplace
s hould
b e
t he e xistence o f t he
r elation
c onsidered
a ccidental .
t he a bove t hree f eatures
b etween
t hem .
I n
H owever,
more
i mportant
i s
t ogether i n t he s ame a rea a nd
p articular
t he h abitation a rea which i s
c ertainly a ssociated with t he f ireplace and
t he b urial,
p rovides
a
g eneral s et o f characteristics f or t he f irst o ccupation phase o f t he s ettlement 3 .3.2.
( see s ection 3 .3).
R e-examination o f
O ne o f e stablish t he n ew
t he
main a ims
a s ecure
e vidence
p revious
d igs .
t he s tratigraphy: o f
w ith t he I n
t he
e xcavation
s tratigraphic t hat
s equence
c onclusions
r espect
w e
o f
o f
t he
t he
r eached
h ad
s ummer
s ites
b y
1 981
a nd
t o
T heochares
a c onsiderable
was
a bout
s uccess
t o
c ompare t he
b ecause
we managed t o i solate and r ecord a n u ndisturbed a nd r elatively d eep d eposit
r ich i n a rchaeological material a nd
c ultural s equence o f
f ully
r epresentative o f t he
t he s ite.
C utting Z p rovided a lso s ome o ther i nteresting f eatures such a s h abitation f loors with a variety o f o bjects i n s itu, f ireplaces with r ich
c arbonized
t o e xamine
t he
material d eepest
a nd
b urials.
s tratum
W e
i n o rder
w ere p articularly i nterested
t o e stablish
h ow
f ar
b ack
t he
f irst p hase o f s ettlement c ould b e p ut i n r elation t o t he Thessalian n eolithic P etros which
s equence,
material h ad
p roblem
b een was
i s l eft
t he
which
more o pen
i s
obviously
c losely a fter
r elative
t he
r elated . t he
f irst
d uration
o f
t he
c haracter
o f
t he
t hird
t o
was
which t he
e xcavation . t his
a ssociation with t he succeeding s tratum. c larify
one
T hat
s tratum
early
t he
main
A nother p eriod
Agios
q uestion r elated and
There was a lso a n eed
i ts t o
t o e stablish whether a l ate
n eolithic s tage i s r epresented a t Agios P etros. A ll t hese q uestions c ould o nly b e r esolved b y c lose s tudy o f t he s tratigraphy o f C utting Z a nd
t he c areful
c lassification o f
t he
2 1
f inds .
The d eepest s tratum c onsisted o f r ed e arth, 0 .20 m a bove t he b edrock w ith many small s tones a nd t races o f b roken s eashells. T he n orthern s ection o f t he c utting h ad a shes a nd c arbonized material s pread a ll o ver b ecause o f
t he
l arge
h earth .
T hus
S tratum
I i s a p ure
h abitation l evel without a ny s ign o f d isturbance o r i ntrusion o f a l ater d ate . A lthough t he monochrome wares r epresent t he b ulk o f t he p ottery r emains, p ainted p ieces w ere f ound a ll o ver t he l ayer e specially i n t he c revices i n t he b edrock . T he s herds b elong t o a v ariety o f s hapes, s mall a nd l arge, which a re t ypical o f al ate p hase o f t he e arly n eolithic i n T hessaly : d eep h emispherical b owls, h igh n ecked j ars with r ounded b odies, b owls with r ing b ases. I mportant, h owever, i s t he f act t hat t he c arinated s hape i s well r epresented i n t his e arly p hase o f t he s ettlement; t he p ainted d ecorations, r ed p aint o n t hick c reamy s lip, f ollows t he r epertoire o f t he l inear a nd wavy motifs k nown f rom t he o ld material. T he u se o f a s lip i s r egular o n t he p ainted s herds while m ost o f t he m onochrome p ieces a re m echanically b urnished. O ur a ttempt t o i solate s tratigraphically t he e arliest material o f t he s ite was u nsuccessful i n t he s ense t hat t he f inds i n t he
e arlier
s tratum,
a part
f rom
t he b lack
t opped
a nd P roto-Sesklo
p ieces, c an b e a ttributed t o e ither a l ate e arly o r e arly middle n eolithic c ontext. A n i ncised p iece which w as f ound n ear t he b edrock may
i ndicate
t hat
t he
P re-Sesklo
p hase
i s
n ot
a ctually
a bsent.
H owever, i t must b e s tressed t hat t he d epth o f t he d eposit d oes n ot p ermit a ny d etailed c lassification o f t he m aterial .
a nd
S tratum I I which l ay i mmediately a bove , h ad a l ight b rown c olour a t hickness o f 0 .30 m . I t was a r ich l ayer a nd p articularly
i mportant f or e stablishing t he c haracteristics o f t he p eak p eriod o f t he s ettlement. T he main f eature o f t he l ayer was t he " compacted s tratum" which c overed t he whole w estern p art o f t he c utting .
T his w as
c haracterized b y a h ard s oil o f a r ather r eddish c olour, t races o f c arbon a nd a g reat d eal o f p ottery s herds a nd a nimal b ones. Al ot o f s tones were f ound e ither s cattered o r f orming a k ind o f wall ( ?) r esting o n o f
t he
" compacted
s tratum" .
( Plan X XIB) .
I n
t he c utting n ear a mass o f s tones a h uman j aw
t he
was
s outhern p art f ound,
b ut n o
o ther t races o f b ones which w ould h ave s uggested a b urial . T here w as n o c hange i n t he q uality o f t he f abric o r t he r epertoire o f s hapes. O ther f inds i ncluded a p iece o f a n u ndiagnostic c lay f igurine ( Fig. 7 4:4) a nd a c lay " ear-plug" l ike t hose r eported b y T heochares f rom o ther T hessalian s ites ( 1967: 8 3, F ig. 4 3); t he l atter i s v ery important f or c hronological r easons s ince i t i s a s ign o f a n e arly d ate . I t i s p ossible a s s uggested a bove, t hat t he " compacted s tratum" r epresents a l evel o f d estruction a nd t he s cattered s tones may well h ave c ome f rom f allen s tructures which p receded t he c onstruction o f t he c urved wall o f t he t hird s tratum . T his o f a t hin l evel o f a shes c onsisting o f
w as r einforced b y t he p resence s mall p ieces o f c harcoal l ying
a t t he t op o f t he s tratum. T heochares s uggests a g ap b etween t he s econd a nd t hird s tratum ( 1970: 2 71), b ut t he e vidence f rom C utting Z d oes n ot p rovide a ny c onclusive s upport f or t his. S tratum I II which h ad a t hickness o f 0 .30 m was g enerally o f a d ark b rown c olour, t hough i n s ome p laces i t t ook a l ighter t one . I t i s n ot c ertain whether t he c olour i s d ue t o t races o f mudbrick u sed f or t he s uperstructure o f t he h ouses, a lthough s uch a h ypothesis i s v ery l ikely i n v iew o f t he a rchitectural r emains o f t he s tratum. T he m ain
2 2
f eature o f
t he
t o
t o
b elong
t hird l ayer i s
t he
c urved wall ,
o f
f rom
t hat
o f
t he
" circular s tructure" f ound
b y T heochares i n t he s outhern end o f
h is
e xcavated
wall
a rea .
I ts
T he
p lan
c urved
i s
b uilt
quite o f
o n
t he
which s eems mass
s tratum.
s tructure
0 .45 m w ide, s olid
p revious
a c ircular
d ifferent
o ur
c utting
d efinitely
p art o f t he s tone f oundations o f a h ouse o r h ut.
t he
r epresents
T he a rea i nside t he
s tructure r evealed many s herds, most o f t hem r ed monochrome w ith t races o f
white
s lip,
i ncluded
and
o bsidian
a lso
s ome
p ainted
b lades,
c lay
l adles,
s tone a xes a nd g rinders . a lso
f ound
p ieces. p ieces
T he
f rom
o ther
r ather
A f ragment o f a c lay f igurine
material
l arge
p ots,
b earing a white
s lip
was
( Plate 3 7d).
3 .4.
C omparison b etween t he o ld a nd n ew d ata - D iscussion: From t he s tudy o f t he n ew material and i ts d istribution t hrough
t he d ifferent c ultural amount o f p ossible
s trata f irm
s equence o f
i nformation f rom methodological
p roblems we had t o These
were
i nto
I h ave
a ccount
during
with
c larification o f
f loors,
we were a ble
( a)
t he
the
t he d istribution o f
t he
n ature
o f
s uch
c ourse
pattern
r elation t o t he number o f
b y T heochares ( b)
t he
t o a void
a lready g iven a n i dea o f
which c an b e c onsidered c hronologically o r t he
b e drawn c oncerning
f irst e xcavation ,
c oncerned
s tratigraphy and i ts r eported
t he
c an
With t he a dvantage o f having a f air
m istakes.
t ake
mainly
c onclusions
t he s ite.
t he
o f of
t he the
t he dig.
soil
a rbitrary
s pits
c ertain c eramic f eatures
c ulturally
f eatures
a s
d iagnostic
f ireplaces,
( c)
o vens,
a ll o f which w ere o nly s ummarily d escribed b y T heochares.
O ther s uch a s
matters
d ealt
d etermining
d eposits,
making
t he
with s ize
t hrough o f
t he
t he
n ew
work w ere
s ettlement,
g eomorphological
l ooking
o bservations
o f
r ecovering a s tratified s equence o f a nimal r emains .
more f or
t he
I n t his
g eneral,
s ubmerged a rea,
a nd
s ection w e
will d eal b asically w ith t hese a rchaeological d ata which e ither c onfirm t he p revious c onclusions a s s et o ut i n s ection 3 .3 o r modify t hem t o s ome e xtent. I t
i s n ow
c lear t hat
T heochares f rom Apart
f rom
such a s
t ripartite
s oil
s tratigraphy s uggested b y
a pplies
a ll
b urials
t he deposit i s o f
and 1 ,
t he
rubbish
t he l ack o f
p its,
t here
a re
t hick d eposits.
1 0 m a lthough i n s ome
t hickness
s loping p arts o f
o f
t he s ite.
t he The
no
T he
p laces
s igns i t
( humus)
o ccupation b etween t hese. b y
the
c haracteristics T he
s ite.
mixing
o f
d ifferent
l ayers
H owever,
c an r each
1 ,
3 0 m
i n
t he
f ollow each o ther
i t must b e a dmitted t here were gaps i n
N evertheless i ndirect c onclusions c an b e
examination
which f it
o f
e specially
t hat i t i s d ifficult t o e stablish whether o r n ot
s equence .
t he
t otal a ctual d epth o f
t opsoil
without any gap o r d estruction l evel.
reached
over
t he t opsoil and o ther d isturbed a reas c aused b y f eatures
material d espite b ecause
t he
t he earlier excavations
i nto
t hree d ifferent
o f
t he
the
consistency
a lready
s trata
h ave
o f
pottery
e stablished G reek n eolithic p roduced
a v ariety o f
f inds
a s d escribed b elow ( see s ection 4 ), which s how no s udden c hange f rom s tratum
t o
d eposit
with more
s tratum . o r
T he l ess
r ed t he
monochrome s ame
wares
s hapes .
b e s een e specially i n the upper l evels,
p ersist
O pen a nd
while t he
b owl c hiefly c haracterizes t he middle s tratum. s tarts
a ppearing
f rom
t he
m iddle
o f
2 3
S tratum
I II
t hroughout
c losed
f orms
t he c an
t ypical c arinated
The p ainted p ottery d ownwards
b ut
r eally
b ecomes i s
c ommon i n S tratum
f ound .
I I where a r ich v ariety o f d ecorative motifs
O ther f inds s uch a s
c lay l adles,
f igurines,
a nimal b ones a nd
t ools a re e qually d istributed t hroughout t he t hree s trata.
T he o nly
material
d own
which
d ecreases
gradually
f rom
t he
t op
l evels
i s
o bsidian. C omparing s tudy
o f
t he
There
a re
t he
n ew
o lder
n o
e vidence
f inds,
we
i ndications
w ith t he c onclusions s ee
t hat
t hat more
r epresented i n A gios P etros .
T hat
t here
i s
r eached a fter
a b road
t he
a greement.
t han o ne main c ultural p hase
i s n ot
t o s ay t hat
i s
s ome f inds d o n ot
p oint t o t he p ossible existence o f o ther p hases, b ut t hese, c annot b e substantiated s tratigraphically . o ccur i n t he u pper p art o f
Late n eolithic pottery s herds d o
S tratum I II a nd i n t he m ixed material o f t he
t opsoil
t ogether w ith middle b ronze a ge f inds ;
i n t he s ame way P roto-
S esklo
material
a rea
Moreover, middle
c an
b e
p eriod
s ince
t here
c orresponds
t o
T hessalian s equence . whether i t i s o verlooked. s eparate
i n
t he
o f
t he
b edrock.
c ertain pottery f orms c an b elong e qually t o t he early and
T hessalian r epertoire . P etros
r ecognized i s
n o
t he
l ate
e arly
H owever,
i n p ottery,
n eolithic o f
b etween
t hem
i n
t he
a nd
e arly
m iddle n eolithic o f character
o f
t he
t he
s ite
f igurine material o r b one t ools c annot b e
s ub-group
r egional entity .
d ifference
t he d istinctive
I n t hat r espect,
c ultural
marked
T hus t he main p eriod o f o ccupation o f Agios
Agios P etros c an b e s een n ot o nly a s a
b ut
a lso a s
p robably
p art
o f
a d istinctive
I n o ther words, I t hink t hat t he s ite i s p art o f a
t he n orthern S porades,
c ultures w ith t heir o wn d istinct
which c ould a nd c learly d id
f eatures
s ustain
( see s ection 8 ).
There i s t herefore n o r eal d iscrepancy b etween t he c onclusions which
r esult
material.
f rom
t he
c omparative
s tudy
o f
t he
new
a nd
t he
o ld
The o lder c onclusions a re c larified a nd i n s ome r espect
amplified b y t he new evidence r ather t han modified i n any e ssential r espect. U ntil
S ome
r eadjustment
t he r eexamination o f
i s,
h owever n ecessary o n c ertain p oints .
t he s tratigraphy i t
was
t hought
t hat
a l ate
n eolithic p eriod c ould b e i solated and d efined within t he n eolithic d eposit
o f
t he
r epresenting
s ite.
a l ate
However,
p eriod
t o
characterize
would not
b e a ccurate.
c eramic r emains f rom the new excavations a re middle neolithic d ate. earliest
material
Theochares was p hase .
o f
S omewhat s imilar i s t he
T here i s n o d oubt
c onsequently
s ite
which
t he
I II
The b ulk o f
a s t he
i ndicative o f a c lear t he q uestion a bout t he
a ccording
s imilar t o t he f inds o f
S tratum
t o
t he
r eports
b y
t he Thessalian P roto-Sesklo
t hat s uch e arly c eramic f eatures d o e xist a nd
f oundation o f
t he
s ettlement
may go
b ack
t o
t hat
p eriod.
H owever i t i s a lso apparent t hat t hese f inds d o not d efine a
s eparate
l evel
b ut
t hey were
f ound
c lear t hat a t A gios P etros t his
t ogether w ith p ainted
c oexistence
o f
s herds .
I t
i s
P roto-Sesklo elements
and p ainted p ottery with a dvanced d ecorative motifs i s p roof o f o ne cultural p eriod ( Chourmouziades 1 971 B : 1 65). t hat
t he s ite was o ccupied f or t he f irst
s imultaneously i n u se . S esklo p eriod d oes n ot
T he g ap
b etween
It hink i t i s p robable
t ime when b oth wares were
t he P roto-Sesklo
a nd
t he
e arly
s eem t o e xist a t A gios P etros.
R egarding t he a rchitectural f eatures, t he i ndications a re f ar f rom c onclusive . A lthough t he r ecent f inds were more i ndicative o f t he s ort o f r emains o ne might expect f rom a s ite o f t his nature,
t heir nature
a nd
was
f unction
i s
s till
o bscure .
P articularly
24
i nteresting
t he
c ase
o f
t he c ircular
s tructure which marked t he t hird s tratum .
T his f orm o f
b uilding i s c haracteristic o f a l ater p eriod b ut h ere i ts middle n eolithic d ate i s well e stablished . I ndications o f t he material u sed f or t he s uperstructure a re l acking a lthough b een f ound i n o ther p arts
o f
t he
s ite.
25
t races
o f
mudbricks
h ave
4 .
F INDS: T he f inds f rom A gios P etros i nclude a g reat v ariety o f o bjects.
T hey will b e d iscussed u nder s eparate c ategories s uch a s p ottery a nd f igurines w hile p articular a ttention w ill b e p aid t o s mall o bjects s uch a s worked b one a nd s tone i mplements which f rom t heir c haracter a nd p osition w ithin t he material c ontext o f t he s ite p resent a s pecial i nterest . I ndividual o bjects o f s ome s ignificance l ike r epresentative p ainted s herds a nd f igurines w ill b e d escribed i n d etail a nd c atalogued s eparately . T he q uality o f p reservation o f most o f t he f inds i s s urprisingly g ood c onsidering t he l ack o f p rotection t he t hin d eposit p rovides a nd t he u nfavourable e nvironmental c onditions.
T his g ood
p reservation i s p articularly n oticeable i n t he f igurine m aterial w here , d espite t he a ccidental d amage which s ome o f t hem h ave s uffered, t he s urface i s s mooth a nd o ccasionally b ears a t hin l ight-coloured s lip ; i n t he c ase o f t he p ainted p ottery t he s herds h ave r etained t heir d ecorative m otifs d espite t he w idespread p resence o f i ncrustation. 4 .1.
P ottery - F abric:
T his c onstitutes t he b ulk o f t he m aterial r emains . P ottery s herds w ere a bundant i n a ll e xcavated a reas, e specially i n t he l ower s trata t o which t he main c ultural p hases o f t he s ite a re a ttributed. T he p reservation o f t hese s herds i s i n g eneral g ood a lthough o ften a l ightc oloured h ard c rust c overs t he s urface o f t he s herds o n b oth s ides; i ncrustation i s p articularly n oticeable o n t he c oarse a nd monochrome p ieces where i t g ives t he i mpression o f a v ery t hick s lip ( Plate 1 8a) . T he c rust d oes not c ome o ff e asily a nd f rom e xamination i t i s c lear t hat t his i s a n e ffect o f t he s ea o n t he c lay. Whole p ots h ave n ot s urvived e xcept o ne o r t wo miniature v ases ( Plate
2 3c,
d );
s ome
o ther p ots
h ave
b een r estored
( Plate 2 4a ,
b ) .
I n
s ome c ases i t was f ound p ossible t o match t hree o r f our p ieces o f p otsherd t ogether, a s i n t he c ase o f t he f luted v ase i mported f rom T hessaly ( Fig. 9 :1), b ut t hese w ere i solated e xamples . T he m ajority o f t he s herds i n g ood c ondition a re t hick b ody s herds, l ugs a nd h andles while f rom t he c arinated b owls t he p art which most f requently s urvives i s t he s ection where t he r ounded b ottom i s l inked w ith t he s ide ( Fig . 6 :3), a p articularly s trong p art o f t he v ase. T he e xact q uantity o f p ottery f rom t he e xcavations o f 1 969-71 was u nfortunately n ot r ecorded . T hus t he p ercentage o f p ainted a nd f eature s herds i n r elation t o t he t otal p ottery f ound c annot b e m easured. The material u sed f or t he p ottery o f A gios P etros h as a s trong l ocal c haracter . I t i s r elatively p ure c lay with a small amount o f m ica a nd s and . T he d ifference f rom t he t ypical T hessalian f abrics i s s o a pparent t hat t he o nly i mported p iece o f c lay, m entioned a bout, was i mmediately d etected . T he p ottery f rom t he m ainland i s m ade o f p urer c lay a nd i s b etter f ired . a nalysis o f e arly s tage . t he
n ature
H owever ,
s tudies c oncerned w ith t he c hemical
t he c lay f rom d ifferent T hessalian s ites a re a t a v ery T he c haracteristic f eatures o f A gios P etros p ottery a re
o f
t he
o riginal
p aste
a nd
t he
s ometimes
p rocedures which r esult i n ad istinctive ware.
i ncomplete
f iring
T he r ather c rude a nd
d ark a ppearance o f t he c eramics i s d ue p artly t o t he q uality o f t he c lay a nd p artly t o t he c onditions o f p reservation.
2 6
There i s n o d irect r elation b etween t he quality o f t he c lay a nd t he
d ecoration :
b oth
t hin
s urface
t he
walled
t ypical
vases
A gios
a nd
o n
t reatment i s c oncerned,
P etros
c oarse
d ecorative
p ots
a s
t he d ominant
motifs
well.
A s
f eature i s
which c haracterizes t he p ainted wares. I t h as a ppearance, a l ight c ream c olour and c onsiderable
o ccur
f ar
t he
o n
a s
white
t he s lip
u sually a matt t hickness. T he
p ercentage o f b urnished s herds i s h igh a nd o ccurs mainly o n t he f ine r ed monochrome wares b ut i s a lso a pparent on t he c oarser p ieces. immediate
e ffect
s urface.
o f
t he
h eavy
b urnishing i s
I n t he c ase o f s ome p ainted p ieces
dull i t s eems
An
t he d ark c olour o f where
t he p atterns
t he a re
t hat t he b urnishing was d one a fter t he d ecoration was
a pplied.
T he s urface o f t he c lay i s smooth o n t he i nside o f t he vase
while
c olour
t he
v aries
c onsiderably
d ecoration i s v ery r are a nd i s 4 .1.1.
D ecorative
The
f rom
l imited
d ecoration o f
t he A gios t he
P etros
a spects
o f
t echniques:
p ainted,
i ncised a nd a pplied .
c ulture
f ound
s tratigraphically s tylistic
a nd
( Plate
d evelopment.
The
i t
i mportance
o f
t he
o ne
former
c onclusions
r ichness
s hapes
i s
c omprises
The
c an
and
s ite a s s uch ( Fig .
mainly c onfined t o s pecific t he
i nside
o f
t he most
a variety
o f
T he r ed-on-cream d ecoration
t ogether with t he d istinctive c haracter o f t he
a shy-gray ;
o nly o ne p iece o f
1 9h).
c ertain
p ottery
and
i s very c haracteristic a nd c ommon; was
t o
t echniques:
i nteresting
decoration
b lack
t o j ust b elow t he r im.
white-on-red
can
b e
b e
d rawn
variety
o f
studied
a s
t he
t o
i ts
p atterns
t he d ecoration c ontribute
4 5-49) .
s ome o f
t o
P ainted d ecoration i s
which a re
h ighly
t ypical
o f
s ite. I n
1 8b) .
c ontrast
T he
t he
r epertoire
( Fig. 2 5).
number o f
o f
i ncised
p atterns
s herds
i ncludes
i s
l inear
v ery small ( Plate
a nd
p ointille
motifs
They a re r ather small p ieces o f c rude s urface a ppearance.
T he a pplied d ecoration i s r estricted
t o
t he f ine monochrome wares .
T he
c oarse p ottery i s c haracterized b y a t hick s ection with i ncomplete f iring a nd t he s urface h as n o s igns o f d ecoration. A number
o f
s hapes
c an b e
r econstructed
These i nclude c losed and o pen f orms d ifficult
t o
d etermine
t he
e xact
with g reat
i n a variety o f
p roportion
b etween
t he
t wo
vase f orms b ecause o f t he l ack o f any s tatistical work . r ough
e stimate
i ndicates
a p reference
f or
t he
p reservation o f r ims a nd o ther d iagnostic p arts o f f or r econstructing t he o f
t he
h ighly
l ower
s ection
c haracteristic
t hroughout
t he
r epertoire o f
f orms .
o f
b owls
c arinated
s hape
d ifferent
( Fig .
s trata
7 ).
i s
o pen
s hapes.
t he v ases i s
i ndicates r ather
t he
t hat
p ersistence
i ndicative
I t was k inds
o f
o f
However,
I n p articular
T he
c ertainty.
shapes.
o f
h elpful s urvival
t his s ome
t he
a
The
was
a
s hapes
u niformity
o f t he s ite 's p ottery r epertoire a nd i ts c loseness t o t he Thessalian t radition t han o f a s ense o f c onservatism. with s lightly e verted r im ( Fig. 3 : ( Fig.
3 :
3 )
c an b e c onsidered
The o pen b owl or p hiale
1 ,2,4) and t he s traight s ided b owl
c ommon c eramic
t ypes.
O ther p ottery c haracteristics w ith a more l imited d istribution a re t he
d ifferent
T he
t hree
k inds
o f
h andles
a nd
s trata o ffered material
l ugs,
r ound
b ottoms
i n d ifferent d egrees
a nd o f
r ing
b ases.
p reservation .
T he p ottery r emains o f S tratum I II which was a lmost d irectly e xposed
2 7
t o
e rosion a nd b ad weathering c onditions were t he worst a ffected. s urface
o f
t he
s herds
h ad
l ost
many o f t hem was s evere.
i ts
s moothness
a nd
t he
The
i ncrustation
o n
I n c ontrast t he q uality o f t he f inds i n t he
two main s trata was s uperior n ot o nly f rom t he
t echnical
p oint o f v iew
( adequate f iring, e legant s ize, d elicate d ecoration ) b ut a lso a s f ar a s p reservation i s c oncerned. A d etailed d escription o f t he d ifferent c eramic f eatures i n r elation t o t he t hree s trata will f ollow with a s hort
l ist o f
4 .1.2.
t ypical e xamples.
S hapes:
There d oes n ot s eem t o b e a ny s udden a ppearance o f n ew f orms i n t he Agios
P etros
material .
T he
r epertoire
o f
s hapes
was
d ominated
b y
t he p resence o f t he o pen b owl o r b road p hiale which o ccurred i n many v ariations ( Fig . a t a ll,
1 8) .
I t a ppeared with a r ing b ase o r w ithout
with c arination,
a ny
b ase
s traight s ides o r f laring and e verted r ims.
T here was a s teady i ncrease i n t he n umber o f s uch v ases
f rom
S tratum
I
t o I I although s light v ariations o f i ts b asic f orm d id o ccur s uch a s s maller v ase b ody
a nd
w ith a h igh
s traight
s ides
r aised
i n
t he
b ase
( Fig .
f orm o f
5 :3) a nd a p hiale
a b asin ( Fig .
w ith d eep
1 4:6) .
T he c losed
s hapes a re r epresented i n S tratum I I i n t he f orm o f j ars which s urvived only i n small f ragments f rom t he u pper p art o f t he b ody ( Fig. 5 :5, 6 ). T he
great
majority
c ategory o f l acking in
o f
h ousehold
a part
S tratum
d istinguished
f rom
t he
c oarse
p ottery ;
v essels
r emains
s eemed
o f b ig
a f ew e xceptionally c oarse
I II.
I n
general
b y i ts e legance,
the
Agios
t o
b elong
t o
t he
s torage p ots a re a lmost s herds
which
Petros
e specially a s f ar a s
were
pottery
t he
f ound
can
wares a re c oncerned and i ts p reference f or o pen f orms ( Fig. 7 ). l ast c haracteristic t ogether w ith t he s traight f eature o f
t he t ine m onochrome w ares
( Fig.
b e
t ypical p ainted
s ides r emained
This
t he b asic
1 8).
O pen f orms B owls o r p hiale C arinated b owls
( Plates
T his i s t he most t he
1 6b,17i,j,k,l,
F ig.
5 :1,2/6,7/28-33)
c haracteristic s hape o f
t ypical A gios P etros
t he s ite
b ecause i t
b ears
p ainted d ecoration a nd i t i s c ommon e specially
i n S trata I a nd I I .
I ts
o f
mainly p ieces s howing c arination i n t he l ower p art
s urviving s herds,
r econstruction was
e asy
b ecause
o f
t he
n umber
o f t he p ot, and t heir good p reservation which i n many c ases i ncluded p arts s ides,
o f
t he
r im
s ometimes
a nd w ith
t he
s ides.
s lightly
f rom a f ew c ases where a l ow c arination which i s a lways T he t hickness o f
t he
T ypical f eatures a re
e verted
r ims,
r ing b ase i s
smooth a nd
s ides v aried
t he
r ound
s uspected
marks
t he
( Fig .
f rom a f ew millimetres
I and i t
b ecame
d ifferent
d ifficult
t o
c ommon i n S tratum I I. c hronological
d etect
a s
f ar
a nd
v ariation which c an b e n oticed
i s
n o
c an
was
c hronological
s ignificance
r ather a v ariation a nd n ot
s hould
b e
s tressed
i s
t he
t he
f orm
s tages i s
a ttached
a n e volutionary
s mall
t o 0 .5cm.
T he
S tratum t hat
The
a re o nly
c arination where
5 :2,
s tage .
t he
b ase .
o f d evelopment
t he
( Fig .
a nd e legant s ize o f
28
t he
p art o f
c oncerned.
t he s harpness o f b e
o f
a part
a nd
D espite t he l ong u se o f
s tylistic
a s
s traight
6 :1),
b eginning
c arinated b owl o ccurred f or t he f irst t ime i n t he u pper s hape,
t he
b ottom,
7 :1,
8 :2);
S omething
i t
which
t he c arinated b owl
o r p hiale
which
i s
o nly 8 t o 1 2 cm h igh,
t hroughout S trata I a nd I I
( Fig.
D eep r ounded b owls
1 7a,b,h,
( Plates
7 :2,
a characteristic r ecorded
3 ).
F ig.
1 :5,
1 5:2)
T hey a ppear i n a v ariety o f f orms a nd s izes t hroughout t he t hree s trata. I t i s a s hape v ery c ommon i n Greek n eolithic f rom t he early s tages o nwards a nd i t i s 1 967:
1 10).
o ften c alled
a h emispherical
b owl
( Theochares
The g reat majority o f t he t ypical r ounded b owls i n A gios
P etros o ccurred i n S tratum I I in b oth d ecorated and f ine monochrome wares
( Fig .
2 1).
I ts d ecoration i ncludes
motifs ( Plate 1 9a,b,c).
b lack-topped a nd r ed-on-cream
A b ig painted s herd i s c haracteristic o f h ow
b eautiful t his t ype o f b owl c an b e ( Fig. 4 :1); r ound
b ody ,
1 6a).
a p ossible
l ow
r ing
a nd
i t c onsists o f a d eep
s lightly
e verted
r ims
( Plate
A r ather smaller t ype i s o ne with a s hallow b ody a nd c arinated
s ides with a r ound b ase a nd t hat
b ase
b oth
v ariations
c ontinued
w ithout
o f
a ny
t hin walls ( Fig .
t he
b owl
o ccurred
s ignificant
c hange
were s ucceeded b y more o pen s hapes.
1 :5,
f rom
P late t he
u ntil
1 7a) .
d eepest
S tratum
I t
s eems
l evels
I II
a nd
when
t hey
A s a s pecial example s hould b e
c onsidered t he shape o f t he imported f luted v ase with i ts d eep b ody which
g ives
t he
impression o f
e verted r ims a nd v ery l ow b ase S traight
s ided b owls
( Fig.
2 :2,
a c up,
i ts vertical
( Fig.
9 :1).
3 :3,
2 2:1)
s ides,
s lightly
l atest
l evels o f
I t i s t he c ommonest f orm o f b owl o ccurring i n t he A gios P etros .
T he s urviving p ieces,
h owever ,
most o f
which a re r ims
n ot a llow t he s afe r econstruction o f
t he s hape e specially a s f ar a s
l ow p art o f
D espite
t he p ot i s
a ssume t hat most o f 8 :1).
A d ifferent
c oncerned.
t he s traight
t ype
o f
t he
s ided
s ame
b owls
c ategory
t hat
i t
i s
h ad a l ow o f
b owl
r easonable r ing
i s
b ase
i t was v ery c ommon i n S tratum
neolithic A lthough
p eriod
t he
c haracteristics a ppear .
( Proto-Sesklo
a bove
S ome
f orm o f r im,
t wo
a re
o f
f orms
a nd i t
i s
- Theochares
a re
well
c oncerned,
t hese
I ,
d efined
d ifferent
1 967:100, f ar
a s
F ig.
6 4).
t heir g eneral
c ombinations
d istinguished
1 7:1,
t he e arly
o f
t hese
d o
a d ifferent
u sually a l ater ( Stratum I II) f eature ( Fig.
1 1:1,2) a nd
S hallow b odied b owls
a re
t ypical o f
b y
t he m ore o pen f orm o f
c ombinations
a s
t o
( Fig .
t he o ne with a
s omewhat more c losed f orm a nd u sually marked b y a t hick r im ( Fig . 1 8 :1);
d o t he
t he b ody w ith f lat o r ( Fig.
2 :7,
3 :5,6,
2 2:2,
l ow r ing
b ase
( Fig.
1 2).
2 3:10,13)
( Plate 2 0a,b) I t i s a c haracteristic a nd a t t he s ame t ime r are s hape i n Agios P etros . i t was
I t
c ould
t hought
b e
e asily c haracterized a s
b etter
t o b e c atalogued
a s traight
s ided
s ize which s ometimes r eaches a diameter o f 0 .40 m ( Fig. 3 :6). shape
t ypical
m issing a f lat There
i s
o f
t he
l ower
l evels
b owl
b ut
s eparately mainly b ecause o f i ts
a nd
a lthough
the
l ower
I t i s a p art
i s
b ase i s v ery p robable. a number o f
s pecific s hape ( Fig. 2 :6).
r ims
which c annot b e a ssociated with a ny
There a re two p ossibilities:
e ither t hey
b elong t o a v ariation o f t he d eep r ounded b owl o r, more l ikely, t hey c onstitute t he c ollar o f a s traight s ided n ecked j ar ,
29
a s hape c ommon i n
Agios
Petros
( Fig.
5 :6).
However,
t his a ttribution i s
c ertain b ecause t he s ection which l inks t he v ase i s m issing. '
b y n o
means
t he c ollar w ith t he s houlder o f
T he monochrome f ine wares a re d ominated mostly b y o pen s hapes w ith vertical
t hin s ides and r ims
T he l ower p art o f
t he v ase i s
s lightly t ilted o utwards ( Fig. l acking b ut a f lat
b ase
1 8,19).
i s v ery l ikely.
C losed f orms J ars
( Fig.
2 :5,
Almost very
5 :5,6,
a ll
p opular
o f
9 :2,
t he
f rom
9 A,
c losed
t he
3 2-34) s hapes
d eepest
b elong t o j ars which a ppear t o
l evels
o f
t he
s ite.
The
b e
d ifferent
v arieties i nclude s traight s ided n eck o r c ylindrical n eck jars ( Fig. 5 :6,
2 2:7) o f a c onsiderable s ize,
funnel
neck
jars
( Fig.
3 2:1,
7 ,
h ole mouth jars ( Fig.
8 ).
I t
s eems
t o
b e
5 :5,
3 4) a nd
an i ncrease
o f
t heir n umbers f rom S tratum I t o I II a lthough t he p ecentage o f e ach t ype i s
u nknown .
T he
h eight
o f
t he
c ollar
v aries
a ccording
t o
s ize o f t he vase s ometimes b eing a s l ittle a s 3 .2 cm.
t he
o verall
The r ound and
d eep b ody i s a c ommon f eature t o a ll t ypes o f jars d espite t he f act t hat
t he l ower part and most o f
r econstruction
i s
t he o ne
t he
s uggested
b ases
i n F ig .
a re
missing.
9 A :1
where
A p ossible
a c ollared
n eck
i s c ombined w ith a r ing b ase. A c onsiderable n umber o f
r ims
f rom c ollared j ars o ccurred i n S q .
i ncluding a s mall c ollar 2 - 3 cm h igh, e verted o utwards .
T here and
0 .6 cm - 1 c m t hin a nd
i s n ot a ny d ifference b etween t he j ars t he
f ine
p lain examples
a lthough
I
s lightly b earing
d ecorative
motifs
t he
o utnumbers
t he p ainted p ieces e specially i n t he l ower s tratum ( Fig.
l atter
9 A:3). S mall c losed vases A l imited
( Fig.
n umber
1 :1,2,3)
o f
b ody
c haracter o f which i s n ot t ypically
s mall
( Fig .
s herds
c lear .
1 :2).
b elong
t o
c losed
T hey o ccur
i n
S tratum
O ther d iagnostic
f eatures
f orms s uch a s
r ims a nd
A part
f rom
t he
s hapes
mostly m iniature,
p otlids
and
c lay
l egs
t hey a ll
t here
s ome o ther o bjects
( stands)
which
5 5-60).
p lay a n i mportant
r ole
must
i s
f ound c ompletely i ntact
a n umber
i n t he
a lso
b e
f orm
o f
o f
t hem
s mall
l adles,
mentioned
A lthough s ome o f
( see
a re very
i n t he c eramic r epertoire o f A gios
P etros mainly b ecause t hey a re v ery well p reserved ; w ere
f rom
f orm o f a c lose p hiale.
d iscussed a bove
a nd
s ection 4 .3) ( Fig. 3 6:2,3,4, r are
H owever ,
f rom o ther T hessalian s ites i t i s r easonable
t o a ssume a r ounded b ody i n t he
v ases,
e xact
t hey a re
b ases a re l acking s o a ny r econstruction i s h ypothetical . s imilar n eolithic e xamples
t he
I a nd
i n s ome c ases
t hey
( Plate 2 4c).
A s ignificant number o f l adles was f ound i n a ll three s trata in d ifferent s izes with a f lat s hort handle a nd a s hallow h ollow.
They
are characterized b y a noticeable uniformity a s f ar a s t heir g eneral f eatures a re c oncerned l ike
h andles,
30
s hape a nd q uality o f
c lay.
T he
u se o f
p roblematic ; ( Fig. l ow
3 6:5,
b ase
s mall m iniature v ases,
u sually w ith f our s hort l egs,
whether t hey w ere s erving a s l amps o r s tands i s n ot P late 2 3e);
a re
o f
i s
c lear
Two e xamples o f c onical v ases with s igns o f
u ncertain
c haracter ;
t hey a re 8 .5
c m
a nd
1 1.6
c m
l ong
a nd 2 .3 cm a nd 1 .8 cm h igh r espectively a nd t hey s hould b e c onsidered e ither a s B ases
s mall
( Plates
s tands o r p otlids
2 2b,
2 3a,
F ig.
( Fig.
3 6:2,3).
3 5-38)
A t ypical f eature o f t he p ottery o f A gios P etros i s t he p resence o f a great number o f l ow r ing b ases i n r elation t o t he f lat o r r ound b ottoms;
i t
i s
r epertoire o f i ts
e arly d ate
e ach
s tratum
a b asic
t he
s ite
( see
c haracteristic
b ut
c hapter
c annot
b e
n ot
a lso a d istinctive 5 .6) .
T he
e stimated
o nly
t rait
f requency
e xactly
o f
o f
o f
t he
t he
t heir
a lthough
c eramic
c ulture
a nd
o ccurrence
i t
l ooks
c ertain c ategories o f b owls employ a s pecific f orm o f b ase.
a s
i n i f
T hus i t
c an b e s aid t hat t he t ypical c arinated and most o f t he h emispherical b owls have r ounded b ottoms ( Fig. 1 :5, 6 :2,3) while a small p roportion h as a l ow r ing b ase ( Fig. 6 :1) o r p ossibly a p edestal ( Fig. 3 7:3). j ars
o n t he o ther h and a re c haracterized b y f lat
b y l ow r ing b ase
( Fig.
b ases
The
a nd o ccasionally
9 A :1).
R ing b ases b ecome more c ommon i n S tratum I I a nd I II among t he o pen b owls
( Fig .
l evels
3 5:1)
( Fig.
a lthough
3 6:4).
t hey d o
Most o f
s ome i solated e xamples
o ccur
s poradically
f rom
t he
d eepest
t he b ases a re g enerally l ow e xcept
which a re more l ike
s tands ( Fig .
3 7:3) .
f or
A r ound
h igh b ase o f an o val v essel was f ound i n S tratum I I ( Fig. 3 5:2). v ery h igh a nd c oarse b ase o f a b ig v ase,
p robably a p ithos
S q.
b ases
I ,
S tratum
I I
( Fig.
3 7:2).
t radition o f T hessaly ( Fig. H andles
S ome
a re
was
t ypical
One
f ound i n
o f
t he
A l
3 8).
( Plates 2 1c,f,g-p,
2 2a,
F ig.
3 9-44)
There i s a r ich variety o f h andles o ccurring i n a ll t hree s trata with one
c ommon c haracteristic;
mostly v ertical.
n amely t he
e specially i n t he l ower s trata w ith a small ( Fig. 3 9:1,2); t hey h ave a s tandard f orm, s addle a s
( 1.5
cm)
t ubular
t he u pper
l ugs
o r
t he j ars
( Fig.
a nd
a s tring-hole .
i n c ontrast
a ll o f
t o
t he
d ecorated s hapes o f
which i s
t o
T hey
t he
s tring-hole i n t he m iddle a c ombination o f a wide
a re
p referably
s tring-hole
h andles
c haracterized
which
d ominate
l evels.
Almost wares
p erforation,
T ubular l ug h andles o ccur i n c onsiderable numbers
t he h andles b elong e ither t o t he monochrome t ine
c oarse
p ottery .
which b ear s igns
4 4).
The
The
c arinated
l ike p hiale a nd o pen b owls t ypical
o f
l edge-lugs
h andles
o f
t he
b owls
and
o n b ig
t he
s houlder
c oarse
o f
t he
s herds
o val l ugs a re l ess c ommon a nd
o f
3 9:4,6).
a re p erforated
( Fig.
b ody
a re
t ubular l ugs with a wide s addle ; t he c ases
o ther
l ack h andles e xcept p erhaps t he
i n most
T he h andle i tself, whether i t i s i n t he s hape o f a t ubular l ug o r a s tring-hole, i s s imple w ith n o o ther d ecorative c haracteristics s uch a s
h orns
o f
h andle
o r knobs .
p erforated
i n
A gios
handle
N oticeable P etros. i n
t he
i s
The f orm
t he
a bsence
o f
a ny
s pecialized
o nly variation which e xists o f
3 1
b utton
( Fig.
3 9:5);
i t
i s
f orm
i s
t he
quite
c ommon
i n
r ow) .
t he
T here
s ite
i s
a nd
a lso
t ypical
a g reat
f or i ts
v ariety
s mall
o f
s ize .
( Plate 2 2a ,
p erforated
h andles
m iddle
( Fig .
4 0:1-
8 ). I n s ome c ases e lements o f t he p lastic d ecoration, u sually small p ellets, p lay t he r ole o f h andles ( Plate 2 1e).
There i s a lso a small
number
b elong
o f
b ig
l ugs
with
a wide
s addle
which
t o
b ig
c oarse
v essels o f middle h elladic a ge a nd t hey were f ound i n t he d isturbed n orth-western a rea o f MT a nd t he r ubbish p it . A s pecial t ype o f h andle i s
r elated
t he
whole
t o
t he
Minyan s temmed g oblet
e xcavated
h andles o f t he l adles a re c oncerned t heir s ize v aries ( Fig. 5 7). N oticeable
i s
f ound
i n
t ue
t opsoil
a rea a nd o n t he s urface ( Plate 4 0b) .
t he
c ontinuity
t hey h ave
a u niform
o f s ome s imple f orms
l evels
A s
f ar a s
s hape
o f t he
a lthough
o f h andles
l ike
the s tring-hole l ugs t hrough t he d ifferent s trata without a ny b asic c hange ( Fig. 4 3). T he u se o f p erforation i s u niversal e xcept o f s ome i solated examples. There i s only one example o f a s olid h andle d ecorated w ith i ncisions, 4 .1.3.
0 .035 m l ong,
f rom t he
t opsoil o f
S q.
I .
D ecoration:
P ainted
( Plates
The
1 6,17,20,
a ppearance
b een d escribed
a nd
F ig.
t he
i n g eneral
4 5-53)
s urface
t reatment
o f
t he v ases
t erms ( see s ection 4 .1) .
h as a lready
H owever ,
b ecause
o f
t he e rosion and b ad weathering c onditions t he a ppearance o f t he c lay and
t he
painted
d esigns
varies
c onsiderably .
s urface f inds a nd c eramic r emains o f e ither
has
b een
i ncrustation p rovided
s herds
m uch e asier T he p art
t o
c overed
with
meaning
most
p ainted
o f
t he
l ess
i t.
motifs
t races
o f
d eeper
l evels,
T he
whose
c ase
c haracter
o f
t he
t he d ecoration p aint
a nd
o r
t he
h owever,
e xecution
a re
t o d efine.
l ower p art
o f
p ainted
r educed
h as
I n
t he t opsoil l evels,
S tratum
o f
S tratum I II,
I experienced
p ottery,
t he
s pecific n umbers not a vailable.
p eak
t he w hole S tratum I I a nd t he u pper
a f luctuation
p eriod
b eing
S tratum
i n I I .
t he
amount
o f
t he
U nfortunately more
o f t he p ainted s herds o ccurring i n e ach s tratum a re R egarding t he main c haracteristics o f t he p ainted
p ottery i n r elation t o t he s tratigraphic s equence, t here c an b e s een a p ersistance o f s ome f eatures . T hey i nclude: ( a) t he t hick c reamy s lip which c overs ( Plate
t hickness
s urface
T here
t hroughout
o ccasionally l ower
t he
1 7a,b).
b ut
i t
s ection o f
s urface
( early
b asically r ed
a lthough p ainted
i n
t he
t he
v ases
a ny
a nd
h as
n oticeable
l evels; I where ( b)
s ome
are
t o
t he
t heir
whitish c olour
c olour d oes
o r
o ccur
T here a re o nly a f ew e xamples
i n t he
p aint
o n
t he
c olour
a very
b urnished
c ases l ose
b e
a pplication
i ts
t he
c an v ary f rom c herise-red s eems
a u niversal
v ariation o f
a s lightly
i s v ery r are .
p ainted).
surfaces d esigns
o f n ot
S tratum
b ut
Burnishing s lipped
i s
o pposite
a pplied o f
t he
t he
p aint
p rocedure. r ed
c an h appen; and
d irectly
t he
which
i s
t o r eddish-brown.
c ommon
b efore
outline
i s
b ecome
p aint i n dull.
Most was t his l t
o f
t he
a pplied c ase i s
t he a lso
p ossible t o h ave t he s ame e ffect b y i ncomplete f iring a lthough i n t his c ase t he c olours o f b oth t he d ecoration a nd t he s urface o f t he c lay a re
3 2
a ltered.
B urnishing o ccasionally c an b e v ery h eavy
T here i s a w ide v ariety d ecorative
e lements,
s imple
o f
p atterns
a nd
o r
c omplex
( Fig .
a nd
r elated i n
f ragmentary .
e ach
s tratum
e stimate .
4 5,48).
o ccurrence
b earing
d esigns
r eaches
i ts
4 6).
T his
c ombinations
a s pecific
f orm
o f
a re
s urviving p ieces are
c ertain b ut
d ifferent
d esigns
m otifs
t he
i s
d irectly
p ercentage o f v ases
d ecoration
i s
d ifficult
t o
i n
S tratum
S tratum
c omplexity
o f
l inear ,
I o nwards
I I
( Fig.
r egards
w eavy ,
b oth
s olid
( Fig.
4 8)
and
t he
2 ), t he
r ange
l ines a nd
s omething l ower
o f
which
p art
o f
p atterns
I II
s uch a s
t riangles a nd a lso
t heir
A ll t hese a ppear t o b e e lements with c lear s tylistic a nd
c hronological The
f rom
p eak
execution .
c ircles
o f
l ayers
o f
T he
I n general t here i s a g radual employment o f more c omplex
p ainted ( Fig .
T he
t o d ifferent s tratigraphical
1 7b).
c ombinations
well d efined and mostly c omplete a lthough t he s mall
( Plate
s ignificance.
early a nd
p ainted
s olid
s herds
t riangles
o f
b ear s imple d ecoration c onsisting o f r ed
p aint
o n
a l ight
b ackground ;
t hey
a re very f ew i n number and a ppear just above t he s terile l ayer o f t he d eposit
( Plate
1 7a,g ,
F ig .
1 :1,2,3,5) .
T he
d ecorative
motifs
i n
t hese
e arly p ieces a re c oncentrated under t he r im o r o n t he b ase a s a b road b and 3 o r 4 cm v ariation
t hick with c areless
s hows
a d ark
b lack b and
execution
o n
t he
r im
z ag l ines o f r ed p aint on a white s lip a s b ody t he
( Fig . end
1 :5).
o f
H owever,
S tratum
( Fig.
a nd
2 :4,8).
a lmost
f ar
a s
t heir
z ig-
t he main d ecoration o f
t hese s imple d ecorative e lements
I a s
Another
v ertical
variety
and
t he
i mproved b y
t echnique
were
c oncerned. L inear
motifs
c ross
h atching,
wavy
l ines
a re
while
and
more
a bundant
c urvilinear
c oncentric
a nd
t hey
d ecoration
a rcs
( Fig.
i nclude
i s
s traight
i ntroduced
4 5).
A t
t he
b y
s ame
l ines,
b ands t ime
o f t he
d ecorative t echnique i n s ome o f t he p ieces i s s till " archaic" with many characteristics o f the early painted sherds: lack o f motif s tandardization d ecorative
a nd
d esign
p oor
a ppears
e xecution f or
t he
( Fig.
f irst
3 ).
A h ighly
t ime .
I t
w oven o r
b asketry p rototype with a c ombination o f
p atterns
i n
6 :1,
a v ery
4 8).
f ine
Under
h orizontal
a nd
t he
p arallel
a nd d elicate r im
t here
l ines
i n
t he
impression o f a f rame o r p anel. t riangles l ike
h anging
c anvas,
p oint
t here
a re
e xecution
a re
i ndividual
r eminiscent
l inear
( Plate
u sually
f orm o f
i s
a nd
1 6b ,
t hree
F ig .
o r
t hin b ands
o f
a
g eometric 5 :1-4,
f our
t hin
which g ive
t he
The b asic motif c onsists o f a row o f
d ownwards
while
p arallel
f illed
o ver
a p attern
b ands;
t he
o f
t hin
l ines
a lternation
o f
l inear a nd g eometric d esigns c reates many v ariations ( Fig. 5 :1, 6 :1). I t
i s
d ifficult
t o
k now
t he
p ractical
d etails
b ehind
t he v ery f ine l ines which were u sed a s b ackground. t o s uppose
t hat a k ind o f b rush was
u sed
a nd
t heir
an o rder r equires a v ery experienced p otter. d iscussed i n t he
Museum o f V olos
methods
might
which
p ossibility o f a t hin
h ave h air
a pplied o n t he s urface o f
b eing
u sed
f or
p lunged
i nto
e xecution
o f
a rrangement
i n
s uch
D ifferent o ptions were
i n o ur a ttempt
b een
t he
They a re t oo t hin
t o e xperiment
t his t he
w ith t he
d ecoration.
p aint
f irst
T he
a nd
t hen
t he p ot was d iscounted b ecause t he d esigns
a re i n s uch position and s ometimes i n such awkward p laces t hat t his method
m ight
h ave
b een
v ery
which was d iscussed was p attern s tamp
i n r elief
t he
d ifficult
t o
b e
p ossibility o f
employed . t he u se o f
A nother s ome
o ption
s ort
o f
p ressed o n t he c reamy s urface o f t he p ot i n t he
3 3
s ame
way s imilar s tamps a re u sed
H owever, o ne .
t o d ecorate
t his s olution was r ejected t or t he s ame
I b elieve,
t hat
t he
s olution
l ies
s imply
t extiles
i n Thessaly .
r eason a s
t he p revious
i n
t he
t echnical
s kills
which were acquired a fter many h undreds o f y ears o f experience i n a process
o f
knowledge
u nderestimated . t his
experi mentation
p eculiar d ecoration l ater I t i s d ifficult
s hapes r ange t he
and
B ut we s hall c ome b ack t o t he
b ecause o f
s hapes
s hould
o f
t he
H owever ,
n ot
b e
t he o rigin o f
( see s ection 5 .5.2.).
t o a ttribute c ertain d ecorative motifs
m ost
f orms .
which
p roblem o f
p ainted t here
d ecoration
i s
a s light
was
t o s pecific
employed
i n
a w ide
d ifferentiation
a s
f ar
a s
which u se a c ertain a rrangement o f d ecoration a re c oncerned .
The n ecked jars, f or i nstance, u sually h ave a p anel d ecoration o n t he c ollar with a s trict a rangement o f t he d ecorative d esigns ( Fig. 4 6). I n general s trictly
a great
d eal
o rganized
o f
the
Agios
d esigns c overing t he main b ody o f p arallel and h orizontal
The
p ottery
f orm
s imple
4 7).
t he
p art s ame
o f
p arallel,
c ircles
4 9).
( Fig.
o f
has
a
l inear b road
s herds
a t hick d eep r ed d esign o n a c reamy s lip,
S tratum
I I
d ecoration:
v ertical and
t he
S ome o ther p ainted
s imilar p ottery f rom A natolia
u pper
b asically
p ainted
i n
t he v ase o r a s a c ombination o f
l ines ( Fig.
b ear a weavy l ike pattern, which r ecall
P etros
d ecoration e ither
( Fig.
and
3 :5,6).
t he
l inear
b eginning
p atterns
o r c urvilinear d esigns
with
o f
I II
b road
with half
h ad
l ines,
c oncentric
A p roblem o f d efinition a rises i n t he c ategory o f b lack-topped p ottery t he
which
r im.
b ears
t he
A lthough
c haracteristic
normally
t his
b road
d ark
d ecoration
c oloured
i s
n ot
b and
u nder
c onsidered
a s
p ainted ( the b lack e ffect i s b ecause o f d ifferent t iring p rocedures) , a v ariation f ound i n A gios P etros c ombined t he d ark b lack b and o n t he r im and
t he v ertical
( Fig.
1 :4, I t
i s
z ig-zag
l ines
P late
1 9a,b,c,e).
a lso
noticeable
o f
t hat
r ed p aint
s ome
b road
o n t he b ody o f
l inear
t he vase
a nd g eometrical
motifs o f r ed p aint on c reamy s lip c over a l arge part o f t he s urface a nd g ive
t he
i mpression o f a l ight-on-dark d ecoration
A pplied d ecoration ( Plate 2 1a,b,d,e, T his i ncludes t o small p ellets;
e llipsoid
7 :2).
5 4)
t he p lastic d ecorative t echnique which i s c onfined t heir s ize and a rrangement i n g roups vary greatly
among d itferent s hapes o f v ases. f ine wares a nd e specially c losed s mall,
F ig.
( Fig.
T hey u sually d ecorate t he m onochrome s hapes s uch a s j ars . T he p ellets a re
i n f orm a nd d ecorate
t he p art o f
t he v ase n ear t he r im
t hough s ometimes t hey a re s ituated o n t he s houlder and a re b igger i n size.
They
h orizontally, c ases,
have
in
groups
( Plate 2 1d,
T he e xamples
a re not d iagnostic a s F ig.
o f
i n v ertical a rrangement
d iscs a nd o vals a re a pplied o n t he
s urviving sherds p laced
survived
o r t hree
two, ( Plate
b ody o f
usually 2 1a,b) .
p laced I n
o ther
t he v ase a lthough t he
t o where
t he d ecoration
was
5 4:5).
p lastic d ecoration i s where t he t hree p ellets
incised l ines ( Fig. 5 4:6).
i n g eneral s imple e xcept o f s ome i n a v ertical r ow a re c ombined w ith
I t i s a lso p ossible t hat t he h orizontally
3 4
a rranged p ellets p lay t he r ole o f h andles a lthough t hey must b e s een more o f a s ymbolic c haracter .
I n t he s ame way s ome
p ierced b utton-like a nd l ess f unctional.
c an e asily b e c onsidered m ore d ecorative
h andles
o f
t he h orizontally
Although t he p lastic d ecorative t echnique i s q uite p opular a nd o ccurs
i n a ll
d eepest
t hree
l evels.
s trata
A part
i t
f rom
s eems f our
c ompletely u nknown i n A gios P etros I ncised d ecoration ( Plate
1 8b,
t hat
p ieces
( Plate
F ig.
i t
i s
more
c ommon i n
impressed
t he
d ecoration
i s
1 8b).
1 1:24,25,26:1,3,9)
T here i s n ot a v ery c ommon t echnique i n A gios P etros a nd i t o ccurs o nly i n t he u pper l ayers a nd t he t opsoil . T he s hapes e mployed a re o pen b owls with f lat b ases a nd s lightly i nwards c urved s ides . main
c ategories o f
i ncised d ecoration :
T here a re
t wo
t he l inear p atterns ( Plate
1 8b ,
u pper r ight, F ig. 1 1:4) and t he c ombination o f i ncised and p ointi ng d esigns
( Fig.
h orizontal
2 5).
p arallel
T he
p ieces
l ines,
with
t hree
o r
l inear
f our,
d ecoration
u nder
t he
r im
c onsist
while
o f
o blique
l ines f ollow b elow ( Fig . 2 5:10,12) . T here a re n o s igns o f a ny m aterial u sed t o f ill t he i ncisions a s i t i s u sually t he c ase. A p iece o f an o pen p hiale s urface
i s
The
w ith
r homboid
h ighly s herds
i ncisions
b urnished with
a nd
t he
i s v ery c haracteristic ;
t he
i ncisions
c ombination
d eep
o f
( Fig .
i ncised
a nd
d ecoration a lthough n ot v ery c ommon a re v ery i nteresting . o f
b ands f illed with d ots
c urvilinear T he
a nd
s urviving
l inear
i t
p ointi ng
T hey c onsist
i n a variety o f p atterns s uch a s z ig-zag,
w ithout
a ny
white
f illing
p aste
p ieces a re v ery s mall a nd n o s hapes c an
N evertheless
t he b rown
1 1:4) .
i s very p robable
t hat
( Fig .
b e
t he p ointi ng
2 5:1-9).
r econstructed .
d ecoration was
employed i n a wide variety o f o pen b owls ( Fig. 2 6:1,8,9); i t was n ot c onfined t o any s pecific p art o f t he v ase a nd t here are s igns t hat i t w as
u sed
t o d ecorate
s mall
c lay
o bjects a s w ell ( Fig .
5 5:1,
5 7:4).
A v ariation o f t he i ncised d ecoration with c lear chronological s ignificance c oncerns a s pecial k ind o f b owl with t hick r ounded l ip ( Fig .
1 1:2,
which a re
2 6:3) .
T he
motifs
i nclude
c onfined o n t he l ips
o f
i ndeed a nd o ccur i n t he u pper p art o f M onochrome w ares Monochrome t he a nd o f
( Plate wares
1 8a, a re
h ulk o f
t he
s hapes,
f rom e legant
t he
F ig.
v ery
i ncomplete .
q uite
t hick
i n A gios
s ize
P etros
f iring methods . i t
g lazed i s
c onstitute
b owls
t o
b ig c oarse
v essels .
Most
o f
t he
s urface
s imilar
t o
t he
o ne
i s
w idespread.
b ear a whitish s lip,
u sed
f or
t he
p ainted
O ther monochrome s herds mainly f rom t he d eepest l evels
h ave d ifferent t he
a nd
c haracterized b y s trong f iring t hough
A h igh b urnishing
s ometimes,
l ines
a re v ery r are
T hey i nclude a w ide r ange o f f abrics
A c onsiderable p ercentage o f monochrome s herds d ecoration .
c rosshatched
S tratum I II.
c ommon
m onochrome f ine p ieces a re
s ometimes
a nd
T hese p ieces
2 3,24)
c eramic material . s mall
c rude X 's
t he v ase .
s hades,
l ight
G lazed
a ppearance
o r d ark ,
which a re
s urfaces d o o ccur
o f
t he
a r esult o f a wash .
p ottery h as a c olour c lose
s urface H owever,
t o
i s
b ut
c ommon
i n
e arly
t he majority o f
t he c olour o f
3 5
t he r esult o f d ifferent
t hey a re n ot v ery c ommon ; n eolithic
a nd
t he monochrome
t he f abric which i s u sually
b rown-black f rom
o r
l ight-brown .
T he
q uality o f
t he s econd s tratum o nwards a nd
T he
t ypical
r ed
s light r ed wash ;
monochrome
s urface
d eteriorates
s herds
a re
o f
t ine
a nd
t he
h ave
a
i nterior
A l imited n umber o f s herds o f a t ine f abric a nd
c ompletely d ifferent a ppearance a re which
i n S tratum
q uality
a small n umber h as a g reyish s hade while
i s s ometimes b lack. S omething
t heir
t hey b ecome v ery c oarse
a ffected
most
o f
c onsidered
t he
a s
imports
monochrome
p ieces
( Fig.
i s
t he
9 :1). s evere
i ncrustation p articularly noticeable i n t he u pper l evels.
T here i s
a lso
" rainbow"
a l imited
n umber
o f
s herds
which
a re
c haracterized
a s
and b ear d ifferent k inds o f shades u sually y ellowish and r ed . fabric
i s
f ine
i ntentional.
a nd I n
t here
t hat
i s
n o
r espect
d oubt i t
t hat
s eems
Their
t he d ecorative r esult
r easonable
t o
c onsider
i s t he
r ainbow c ategory a s d ecorative w are. M inyan ( Plate 4 0b) T here t he
i s
a c onsiderable
s urface a nd
t he
m iddle
n umber
o f
h elladic
a ppearance o f Minyan ware .
s herds mainly f rom
p it
which
a s oapy
smooth h igh
t he
t he
t opsoil,
c haracteristic
Most o f t he p ieces a re p arts o f r ims a nd
b elong t o h igh s temmed g oblets with h andle. h ave
h ave
b urnished
They a re wheelmade and
s urface
a nd
a p ale g rey c olour.
H owever, i t s hould b e s tressed t hat t he g eneral l ook o f t he s herds i s quite d ifferent f rom t hat o f t he t ypical Minyan p ottery o f s outhern G reece .
T he p ieces
f rom A gios
P etros
h ave
a p roduct p robably o f a l ocal middle T hessalian i nfluences
a more
p ale
a nd
s oapy
l ook ,
h elladic workshop with s trong
( see A ppendix I V).
S election o f c haracteristic p ainted p ottery: 1 . T he
Two p ieces o f a p ainted vase;
b rown c lay with f ew grits.
i nterior i s g lossy a nd b lack while t he o utside b ears a c reamy s lip .
T he b lack t opped r im i s f ollowed b y a d ecorative n et motif p aint ( Fig.
o f b rown-red
6 :3).
2 . Two s herds o f a s imilar c arinated b owl. B rown c lay, c reamy s lip a nd r ed p aint . M echanical b urnishing, g lossy b lack i nterior,
matt
c lay s lightly d irty ( Fig.
6 :2).
3 . P art o f a p ainted p hiale c onsisting o f s even p ieces; r edb rown c lay, c reamy t hick s lip, p aint d eep r ed t o c erise . L inear d ecoration
i n
p rototypes; ( Fig.
a rrangement
imitating
woven
o r
b asketry
maximum d iameter 1 7.5 cm
6 :1). 4 .
s lip a nd t he
g eometric
s ix p arallel b ands s urvived,
A h igh n eck c erise p aint .
i nterior
d ecoration a nd 5 .
o f
t he
r ow o f
o f
a c ollared j ar .
A p ainted v ase
n ear
s trip t he
s olid p ainted
T he p ainted u pper p art
b rown
c lay
w ith
Matt
surface
c ombination o f
whitish and
s olid
a delicate
c olour
r im;
t hick d ecorates
( Fig.
s lip
decorative
a nd
motif ( Fig.
o f
l inear
5 :6).
a h ole mouthed j ar; C reamy
t riangles a nd w avy l ines
3 6
1 c m
a c ombination
t riangles o f
p articles .
D eep b rown c lay w ith whitish o f
f ine
d ecorated
ware, i nside .
c onsisting
5 :5).
o f
a
6 .
A s herd
c m d iameter i s
d ecorated
a p ale
b elonging
t o a n o pen b owl
o n
b oth s ides:
i nside w ith r ed-on-cream a nd o utside
r ed-on-yellow c olour .
a l inear a rrangement ( Fig. 4 .2.
w ith s traight s ides w ith 4 0
b rown c lay with t hick whitish s lip i nside a nd o utside .
F igurines
( Plates
T he
3 6.
d esign
P late
2 5-37,
F ig.
c onsists
o f
v ertical
I t w ith
b ands
i n
2 0a).
6 4-74)
The f igurine material i s o ne o f t he most i nteresting a spects o f t he
A gios
e xcept
P etros
f or
o ne
f inds .
s tone
I t
i ncludes
f igurine ;
f ifty
t hey
p ieces
r epresent
b ody and b elong t o v arious t ypes and f orms. s ecure
n eolithic d eposits .
mostly
made
d ifferent
o f
p arts
c lay
o f
t he
Most o f t hem c ome f rom
E xceptionally b eautiful
i s
t he
s election o f
h eads which are v ery important i n v iew o f t heir c ross c ultural l inks with d ifferent
g eographical
r egions .
s ite i n f igurine material i s a rea,
t he
u nfavourable
t hat
t he
main
p art
were
p articularly
c onditions
o f
t he
r ich
i n
T he
r ichness
o f
t he A gios
s urprising c onsidering t he f or p reservation
s ettlement f igurine
i s
a nd
s ubmerged .
f inds
a s
we
u sually
without
t he
skilled
f igurines. a nd
t he
o ther
execution T he
h air
a ny
f acial
a re
v ery
o f d eep o r s hallow
o f
t he
o r
d etails
f eatures
a nd
l ines
d ecoration
t he
i s
T he
l acking
d oes
u sual
I II
f abric,
p articles) h inder
t ypes
o f
t echnique
t he e yes,
a nd
n ot
d ifferent
c haracteristics
t o r epresent
c overs s ome f igurine f ragments.
I I T he
small
d ecoration
o f
o ther
f inely e xecuted .
i ncised
p lastic a nd p ainted
f inishing
p ossibility
s een .
a lthough o f c rude a ppearance ( dirty l ocal c lay f ull o f a nd
t he
S trata
h ave
P etros
small e xcavated
t he
i s
o f
h ead
t he
u se
mouth a nd h air ;
a lthough a t hick c reamy
s lip
S ometimes, h owever, t he d ecorative
i ncisions a re f illed w ith white c halky m aterial. There
a re
t hree
t ypes
o f
material:
d ifferent
p arts o f t he b ody o f f at female f igurines and r epresentations. The f acial c ommon
O nly o ne s tone f igurine w as
r epertoire
f eatures
o f
h eads
a nd o ther
c haracteristics
s maller t ypes a s w e s hall
i s
varied
d etails i n
o f
t he
a l imited
t ypes
o f
h eads,
small p arts
o f
animal
f ound.
i n
s tyle,
t he
execution
s kin .
T he
a ppearance
number
c an
s eparate
o f
o f
s ome
t hem
t o
s ee.
A h ead o f a c lay f igurine f ound i n t he t op o f S tratum I II near a mass o f s tones i s v ery i nteresting ( Plate l ong f ace, t he e yes a re r epresented b y d eep i n t he
s hape o f
g rains
o f
wheat,
while
t he
3 1a, F ig. 6 4:2). s lightly o blique n ose
i s
s haped
I t h as a i ncisions
p lastically .
On t he u pper p art o f t he h ead t here i s ar epresentation o f a c oiffure o r h at, v ery
c onical
d eep
i n s hape a nd
i ncision
f rom
t he
f lat
i n t he t op ,
f ace .
T he
o f a z ig-zag l ine o n b oth s ides o f s eparation b etween
t he h ead
t he f ace a nd u pper p art o f
we have a r epresentation o f
which i s
u nusual
s ome k ind o f
t hing
s eparated i s
t he
which s eems t he h ead.
with a
e xistence
t o mark t he
Whether o r n ot
hair d ressing o r h at
i t
i s
d ifficult t o s ay b ecause t here a re n o o ther d etails i n t he execution . The h ead i s 0 .037 i n h igh and i t s urvives with p art o f t he n eck . The a ppearance o f t he f igurine i s v ery c rude a nd i t gives t he impression t hat
i t
f iring wash);
i s
r eady
t o c rumble away .
i ncomplete t he
c areless
c lay
making.
a nd i s
t here
f ull
o f
H owever,
a re
T he q uality o f n o
s mall
t races white
d espite
3 7
o f
t he c lay i s p oor,
o ther
p articles,
i ts
r ough
f inishing
i ndications
appearance
t he
( slip o f
o r t he
which,
I
b elieve,
i s
mainly d ue
t o
b ad p reservation ,
t he h ead h as a s trong s ense
o f modelling with i ts r ound s urfaces and smooth c urving o f t he f ace. I ts
most
unusual
i ncisions
f eatures
a re
o n b oth s ides o f
t he
c ompletely u nknown e lsewhere
t he
u pper
f ace;
e nd
b oth
o f
t he
should
h ead
b e
a nd
t he
c onsidered
a s
i n G reek n eolithic.
A nother f igurine with t he s ame c haracteristic i ncision o n b oth o f
sides
I t
i s
t he
f ace
a small
p lastically i ncisions
made
e xecuted : f or
p ortion o f
i s a h ead which was
h ead t he
t he
a b ig
eyes;
h ead
o f
c lay
h eavy
t he
f ound i n S tratum I II, with
n ose
l ips
t he
f eatures
s lightly
a re
b ig
and
t he f orehead b ears
above
b roken
C utting MT .
o f
t he
a nd
p lastic.
The
a h orizontal
which ends o n b oth t emples i n t he f amiliar z ig-zag l ine. f ace g ives
t he
impression o f a mask.
E xamples o f
t otally unknown i n Thessaly ( see s ection 5 .5.3.). c lay a nd
t he
a ppearance
o f
t he
f abric
a re
f ace
t hick d eep upper
i ncision The whole
k ind a re n ot
this
T he quality o f t he
t he s ame a s
t he p revious
f igurine: d irty c lay f ull o f small white s tones, c ertainly o f l ocal o rigin a nd i ncompletely f ired ( Plate 2 6a,b, F ig. 6 4:3). Moreover two deep i ncisions which d o not s eem t o b e i ntentional mark t he l eft a nd r ight
c heeks. T he
t hird
f igurine,
a lthough i t
t han t he previous two ( the
f ace
w as
f ound i n much worse c ondition
i s damaged a ll o ver) does,
h owever,
c ertainly b elong t o t he s ame c ategory: i t b ears t he c haracteristic i ncisions and t he s ort o f h air d ressing o r h at mentioned a bove. H owever ,
j udging
f rom
t his
e xample
( the i ncision c ontinues a t
t he b ack
o f t he head) i t i s more l ikely t hat t his i s a c overing o f t he h ead and not a c oiffure.
F rom t his f igurine t here a lso s urvived a p art o f t he
c ylindrical n eck,
while
f igurine w as f ound i n T i, A f igurine t opsoil with
l evel 6 ,
with t he s ame
l evels o f
i ncised
t he e ars are p lastically r epresented. S tratum I II
a nd
6 5:4).
t ypical f acial f eatures
t he c ircular s tructure .
eyes
( Fig.
a h ole
f or
t he
I t
was
f ound
i n
i s a b adly p reserved
mouth ;
t he
d isproportionate t o t he s ize o f t he f ace. A ll d eliberate i ntention i n t he manner o f e xpression .
The
nose
i s
t he h ead
b ig
a nd
t he d etails s how a A part f rom t he o val
face t here a lso s urvive p arts o f t he n eck and t he b ust. h orizontal i ncision o n t op o f t he f orehead which c ontinues
A d eep o n b oth
s ides o f t he t emples marks t he s upposed h at . Where i t f inishes a t t he b ack o f t he h ead, however, i t l ooks more l ike h air ( Plate 2 6c,d, F ig. 6 4:1). A c lay h ead with s imilar characteristics was f ound o n s urface during t he 1 981 e xcavations. I t i s important t o note
t he t he
d ominant f eatures o f t he u pper p art o f t he h ead and t he t emples ( Fig. 6 5:2). Two o f c ategory
t he
m ost b eautiful
( Plates
3 1b ,
2 5) .
T he
f igurines f ace
i s
o f t he s ite b elong t o t he s ame e longated
a nd
o val
a nd
e nds
i n
a p ointed c hin; p art o f t he c ylindrical n eck s urvives a s well. The eyes a re r epresented b y deep h orizontal i ncisions while t he nose i n b oth c ases t he h ead i s
i s d amaged .
I n t he f irst
o f
t he f igurines
t he u pper p art
s eparated b y a d eep i ncision which i s h orizontal o n t he
o f t op
o f t he f orehead and t he b ack o f t he h ead while i t t akes t he f orm o f z ig-zag i n t he two s ides; t here i s n o o ther mark o n t he h ead. The r epresentation 7 5b)
i s
q uite
o f
t he
t op
d ifferent .
s ection o f
t he o ther
S tripes
i ncised
o f
3 8
f igurine
l ines
( Plate 2 5,
d ecorate
t he
F ig .
h at
o r
h old
t he
c oiffure
t he
r ounded
T he
e xpression
o n t op o f b etter
d epending
s urfaces o f
t he
a nd
o n
t he
t he
i nterpretation .
g entle
c urving
I n
t he
b oth
c lay
i s
f igurines
n oticeable.
f ace i s d istinctive a nd t he p osition o f t he h ead
t he
l ong r ounded n eck i s
q uality
o f
t han
t he
p revious
p owerful.
The
c lay
i s
o nes a lthough t here a re
h eavy i ncrustation o n t he s urface .
T races
o f
t he
white
s omewhat t races
material
o f
which
f illed t he i ncisions o f t he s econd f igurine c an s till b e s een. The f irst o f t he f igurines was f ound i n S tratum I I and t he s econd i n S tratum I II; I n
t hey w ere s tratified
C utting
s ignificant
MT ,
f or
S tratum
t he
l ight
i n w ell d efined n eolithic c ontexts.
I II,
i t
was
c asts
f ound
o n
t he
a f igurine
c ultural
which
i s
r elations
c ontacts o f t he s ettlement o f Agios P etros ( Plate 2 8).
I ts
a nd
maximum
h eight i s 0 .062 m a nd i ts t hickness i n t he b ase o f t he n eck i s 0 .03 m . I t c onsists o f a h ead and a l ong n eck i ndicated o n a l ong c lay r od b y t he u se o f a variety o f i ncisions;
t he f igurine b elongs t o t he t ype
k nown a s r od-head f igurine which i s q uite c ommon i n t he B alkan a rea b ut occurs l ess f requently i n G reece ( see s ection 5 .5.3). f eatures
( eyes,
e yebrows,
h air)
a re
r epresented
f rom t he n ose which h as a b ird l ike l ook . t he e xecution o f
t he
A ll t he f acial
i ncised
l ines
a part
The mouth i s a bsent while
t he eyes a re shown b y an i ncomplete s quare. f eature i nvolves
b y
The most c haracteristic
l ong h air a t
t he b ack o f
t he
h ead
a nd o n t he f lat t op o f i t: v ertically d rawn z ig-zag l ines i ncised b ut i n c ontrast with t he r epresentation o f t he e yes n ot v ery d eep a nd p robably h as
f illed
w ith white
a d ifferent
material .
a rrangement:
O n
t here
i s
p arting o f t he h air b y i ncised l ines.
t he
t op
o f
a c areful
t he
h ead
t he
h air
r epresentation o f
t he
A t op knot which i s s tuck o nto
t he f lat h ead a nd s ometimes a ccompanies t his t ype o f f igurines ( Nea N ikomedeia) i s
l acking h ere ;
t here i s n o s ign
o f
a c avity
which
would
s uggest t hat s uch a t op knot existed. The c lay s eems t o b e o f l ocal o rigin with a l ot o f small white g rits b ut the a ppearance o f t he f igurine
i s
quite g ood
s uggesting
a b etter
d egree o f p reservation.
T races o f t he t ool u sed t o s hape t he f igurine c an b e s een o n t he n eck a nd u nder t he n ose
( burnish)
( Plate 2 8,
l eft
p hotograph).
One o f t he b est p reserved f igurines o f t he s ite i s t hat f ound i n C utting
MT ,
S tratum I I .
u pper p art o f
t he
( Plate
The
3 0).
I t
c onsists o f
b ody ( shoulders, h eight
i s
t he h ead,
0 .065
m
a nd
e yes
a re
i mpression o f a c onical h at .
T he
b road i ncisions which s tart
f rom
d irection
e xtension o f
o f
t he
c onical
i n s hape a nd
t he
h at;
t he l ine which s hapes
t he
u pper
p art
r epresented
b y
g ives
t wo
d eep
t he a nd
t he b ack o f t he h ead a nd r each t he
e dge o f t he n ose i n a v ery s chematic way . t he
o val
o ne a rm) o f a p robably male f igurine
T he n ose i s t he
ears
t he j aws .
T he
l ong a nd
a re
f ollows
r epresented
mouth
i s
d epicted
a t ypically T hessalian way b y a s imple h ole above t he c hin .
a s i n
What i s
more i nteresting i s t he u pper p art o f t he b ody which s urvives i n t he f orm o f o ne a rm b ending o n t he c hest p erhaps i ndicating s ome f orm o f g esture, r ounded n eck .
while
t he
s houlders T he
e specially
o ther
which
e xecution o f n oticeable
h alf
a re t he
i n
t he
i s
b roken ;
t he
c ontinuation
o f
f acial
i ts
c haracteristics
p rofile
( Fig .
i mpression o f a b ird l ike a ppearance . v iew,
t he
f igurine
smoothly f rom h eavy
i s
c arefully
t he t op o f
i ncrustation
c an
b e
F rom
s haped
t he h ead
t o
t he
d etected
i n
s ome
3 9
a rms t he
6 6:1); t he
s tart
s hort
f rom
t he
c ylindrical
i s
s chematic ,
i t
a lmost
a s
g ives
i s t he
c onstructional p oint o f
with
t he
chin . p arts
s urfaces
However, o f
t he
r unning
t races
s houlders
o f a nd
t he
b ust. A nother
f igurine
r elated
i n many ways
t o
t he p revious e xamples
t hat which was f ound a gain i n MT b ut i n S tratum I ( Plate 2 9c,d, 6 4:4).
T he
f ace
d eep i ncisions n eck s urvives h at
i s
l ong
w ith a d isproportionately
f or t he e yes a nd a r ounded c hin . while
o r c oiffure o f
t he
t op p art
o f
t he h ead
which o nly a s mall p art
b ig
a nd
A s mall
i s
s uch
f ragmented
a s
way .
t he
ears
B ecause
and
o f
i ts
mouth s oft
c haracterized b y a h igh
s urvives .
was d amaged d uring
t he c leaning p rocess ;
f ace
h eight
s urface .
r elate
t his
I ts
f igurine
i s
0 .035
a re
c lay
m .
T he
r emains
s urface
s cratches a nd
o f
c an
i n t he
n ext
a
b e
a
v ery
f igurine
s een o n
c haracteristics
t he
o f
O ther f acial
r epresented
t he
S pecific
t o t he p revious o ne
h eavy n ose,
s ection o f t he
h eavy c ream s lip c an b e s een o n many p arts o f t he f ace. f eatures
i s
F ig.
o ne ,
a s
t he
which
w e
s hall
s ee, a re t he f orm o f t he f ace ( elongated a nd smooth), t he method u sed t o r epresent t he n ose a nd a nd
t he g eneral l ook o f
t he
e yes,
t he
e xistence
A n a lmost i dentical f igurine was f ound i n t he o f
t he
n ear
s econd
t he
( it
i s
d uring t he d ig; a ll
o ver
n ot
s outh-western i ts
c lear
which)
c orner
i ts h eight
s urface .
o f a h at
o r
c oiffure
t he f ace s tanding o n a r ounded l ong n eck.
T he
o f
t he
o f
t hird s tratum o r e nd
C utting T i,
p it .
I ts
a bove
l eft
c heek
t he was
h ardpan d amaged
i s 5 .5 cm a nd t races o f s lip c an b e s een
r ounded
f ace
s its
o n
t he
s trong n eck
i n t he
s ame way a s we s aw i n t he above two f igurines. T he n ose i s b ig while t he eyes are two d eep i ncisions a lmost l ike h oles ( Plate 2 7, 2 9a,b, F ig.
6 6:2).
The f orehead i s l ong and e nds i n a s hort c ircular h at o r
c oiffure which a t t he b ack g ets b igger; I t hink, h ere t he evidence s upports t he v iew o f a c oiffure more t han a nything e lse b ecause o f t he f ormation a round
t he
h ead
which u sually
i s
a n
i ndication
o f
h air
h eld
t he h ead o f a c lay f igurine.
I ts
t ogether. S tratum
I i n T i
s ize i s small,
p it
r evealed
t he nose i s missing while t he eyes a re r epresented b y
two h orizontal i ncisions;
t he e ars a re i ndicated p lastically .
T he
c hin i s b roken and t he mouth i s a s imple h ole. G enerally, i t i s a f igurine c learly b elonging t o t he Thessalian m iddle n eolithic ( Plate 3 1c,d). An i nteresting male b ust I t
i s
an
a lmost
miniature
o f c lay was f ound i n S q.
f lat
r epresented b y incisions ( eyes, The g eneral impression i s t hat c onstruction . o r d ue
I t
d eep d ark c olour T he u pper a lso
f ound .
f acial f ound
I t
n ot
o f
e asy
( Plate 3 6b,
p art h as
t o
o f
a c rude
r ecovered
f rom
t he e yes a re
I ,
S tratum I .
f acial
f eatures
whether
t he
T he c lay i s
r esult h ard,
i s
i ntentional
s olid a nd h as a
f igurine a nd
w ith
b ird-like
a ppearance
a lmost p hallic s hape
I ,
S q .
r epresented
T he m outh i s a s imple h ole a nd
S q.
I V and
i t i s
A d amaged h ead I ;
5 .2 cm h igh ( Fig. o f
a c lay
t he u pper p art o f
b y
t wo
h orizontal
t he
t he n eck i s r ound a nd l ong
40
i t was 7 0:4,
f igurine h ead i s
i ncisions
was
w ithout a ny
o f a c rude r epresentation o f a b ig n ose ;
s ection).
S tratum
t he
6 9:3).
a c ylindrical
f eatures e xcept b ottom
s ay
F ig.
with
mouth) o r p lastically ( nose, e ars). o f a g rotesque f igure o f c areless
improvisation .
i n a mixed d eposit o f
P late 3 6a, while
i s
t o a s pirit
f igurine
( Fig .
( Plate
was
b roken 6 5:1). 3 5a).
o f
I n t he s econd c ategory o f t he material a part f rom t he
f igurines
a re h eadless p ieces,
q uality o f
t he
c lay
a ppearance o f and
t he
f igurine f inds w e h ave l isted t he r est a nimal r epresentations . Most o f t hese
t he
i s
p arts
e verywhere
f abric v aries
f iring.
A ll
o f
o f
t he
f at s ame
f emales a nd a croliths.
T he
o f
t he
l ocal
o rigin ,
d epending o n t he d egree o f
t hem
b elong
t o
t ypes
v ery
while
p reservation
c ommon
i n
t he
T hessalian e arly a nd m iddle n eolithic r epertoire . T hus t his material s hould b e c onsidered a s t he one which h as t he c losest r elations with t he G reek m ainland. A f ragmentary u pper
p art
o f
a f igurine w ithout
i n T i, S tratum I I ( Plate 3 7e, F ig. 6 7:5).
t he h ead
was
f ound
I t b elongs t o t he c ruciform
t ype with a h eight o f 0 .033 m a nd width 0 .038 m .
I t h as a l ong n eck
while
t he
t he
h orizontal
b ar
i s v ery b adly s haped; f igurine
s urvives.
which
r epresents
p robably
e xtended
h ands
only a small s ection o f t he l ower p art o f t he
A s imilar
f igurine
l evels ( Plates 3 7h, F ig. 6 7:1);
c omes
f rom
S q.
VI,
i ts h eight i s a lmost 4 cm.
t opsoil Two more
c ruciform t ype f igurines were found ( Fig. 6 7:2, 6 7:4) i n S tratum a nd
I I
r espectively
T he f emale a re
T hey a re
c haracterized s urfaces .
b y
t he
O ne
o f
r evealed a n umber o f f ragments o f f at
e ither
r ich t he
I II
3 7a) .
s ite o f A gios P etros h as
f igurines .
c urved
( Plate 3 7h ,
l egs,
b ellies
a ppearance
most
o f
o r
t he
s houlders
f lesh
c haracteristic
a nd
e xamples
a nd
t he i s
t hey
r ounded t he
c lay
l eg o f a f at f emale f igurine with p art o f t he l ower p art o f t he b ody ( Plate v ery
3 4a ,
F ig .
6 8:6) .
d etailed:
T he
t oes
o f
e xecution o f
t he
f oot,
b etween t he t high and t he l eg. on many p arts o f t he l eg. f ound i n t he C utting MT, The v ery
b ack o f
Another w ell-moulded marks
6 9:2,
i s
t he
p lastic
s ole,
b ut
a lso
d istinction
Traces o f a c reamy s lip s till survive
S tratum I I.
i s
t he
t o c ome f rom a f emale i dol;
r epresentation
o f
t he
b ack
b y
t he
d eep
P late 3 3b).
f igurine f emale
f lesh o f
The h eight i s 0 .058 m and t he f igurine was
a f igurine which s eems
c haracteristic
i ncision ( Fig.
t he
c urve
f ragment
b elly
c onsists
( Plate
3 7g,
o f
F ig .
t he middle s ection o f a
6 7:3);
a c avity a t
t he
t op
t he p lace where t he u pper p art o f t he b ody was i nserted.
The
f igurine c onsists o f t hree p ieces p ut t ogether i n a r ather c areless manner . s hape
T he most well executed i s t he b elly which h as a p illow-like
with a b utton
i n
t he
middle.
T he
c lay
i s
d irty
and
h as
the
f amiliar l ocal a ppearance while t races o f a c reamy s lip c an b e s een h ere and t here. S tratum o f
t he
I I . f lesh
ways g ives F ig.
T he t he
b elly o f
a f emale
a round
a p regnant f emale
o f
t he
p robably
f abric
b ecause
I ,
i dol w ith t he d ifferent l ayers
v ery n aturalistically
q uality
smooth,
o f
i s
t he
( Plate
n avel ; 3 6a,
noticeably
i n
s ome
t op s ection ,
b etter:
t he
t he u se o f a s lip while
t he
t he c lay h as a r eddish s hade. l eg
c ircular
p artially i ncisions
t he
i mpression o f
The
i s
c olour o f
i s
moulded
t he
6 9:5).
s urface
A s imilar f ragment o f a f igurine was f ound i n S q.
I t
o f
b ent a t
a f at
c lay
s tructure t he
a nd
i t
e nd
o f
f emale
( Plate s eems t he
l eg
f igurine was
3 4b, t hat
F ig. t he
r epresent
c reamy s lip c over t he u pper p art o f
4 1
f ound
6 8:7). f igure t he
t he l eg .
i n
I ts was
t oes .
t he d eposit o f l ower
s eated; T races
A f ragment o f
p art
i s
a f ew
o f
a t hick
t he
b ody o f
a f emale f igure w ith i ncised a t riangular t he
f orm
was
a lso
l ines d efining
r eported
( Fig .
t he a rea u nder t he b elly i n
7 0:1) ;
o nly
t he
o ne
h alf
o f
b ody s urvives. A more o r l ess s imilar s eated f igurine was f ound i n S q. I , S tratum I t i s t he v ery small l ower s ection o f a f emale f igure which
I I.
i ncludes
t he
t orso
a nd
o ne
o f
t he
l egs .
D espite
i ts
s ize t he m oulding
o f t he s urfaces i s surprising ( Plate 3 6d, t op s ection, t hird
s eated
s tructure,
c lay
S tratum I I
H owever, T i,
S tratum
c rouching
f igurine,
f ragmentary was
( Plate 3 2a,
F ig.
h er
I t
i s o f
l egs .
t he
O nly
F ig. 6 9:4) . i n t he
A
c ircular
6 8:5).
t ype k nown a s " squatting" :
t he
l ower
p art o f i ts r ight l eg i s missing . t he l ength o f
f ound
a more c omplete f emale f igurine w as r eported f rom C utting I II .
o n
v ery
h alf o f
a f igure
t he b ody s urvives
while
I ts maximum h eight i s 0 .046 m a nd
t he b ase 0 .02 m ( Plate 3 7f,
F ig.
6 9:1).
F ive more f ragmentary l egs were f ound i n d ifferent p arts o f t he s ite .
A ll
o f
t hem
a re
c haracterized
b y
t heir
r ound
s urfaces
a nd
a lso
t he good quality o f t he f abric ( Plates 3 4c,d, 3 7d, F ig. 6 8:4, 6 9:3, 7 0:2, 7 1:1,2). A f ragment o f t he b ended a rm o f af emale f igurine was f ound i n S q.
V ;
i t
i s 4 .5 cm high and 4 .2 cm
wide
( Fig.
7 0:3,
P late
3 6e). An e legant
c lay f oot
b elonging t o a f igurine o r p robably a n a ctual
vase i n t he shape o f a h uman f oot, was f ound i n MT,
S tratum I II.
I ts
h eight
i s 0 .065 m a nd t he l ength o f t he s ole 0 .048 m ( Plate 3 2b,
F ig.
7 1:3).
I ts u pper p art i s h ollow and p artially damaged a t
T he
a nkle
g ood a nd
i s
well
smooth p erhaps d ue
i s n o d oubt a bout u sual
small
c hild's
r epresented
white
t he
while
t he a ppearance o f
t o t he u se o f
l ocal o rigin o f
p articles .
t oy t han a v ase o f
s ome
was
c onsists u pper c lay
o f
p art o r
r eported i s
I n g eneral
f rom T i,
d amaged, b ody
T here
t he c lay which i s f illed w ith t he t he
o bject
l ooks
more
l ike
a
s ome o ther s ignificance.
a g rey g ranite
wooden
i s v ery
s ort o f r ed s lip .
The o nly s tone f igurine f ound in Agios P etros which
t he f ront.
t he v ase
t he
S tratum
s tone
with
a t
i s
3 3c,
an
" acrolith" 6 6:3).
I t
A lthough
i ts
l ower s ection which e ntered
t he
a s mooth
c ylindrical
s urvived
I I ( Plate
F ig.
s urface .
c onsiderable
l ength .
The
maximum
h eight o f t he " acrolith" i s 0 .05 m . The
t hird
c ategory
o f
f igurine material
i ncludes
c lay o bjects
which c annot b e i dentified e ither a s a nimal r epresentations o r a s p arts o f
o ther
o bjects.
A lthough
many
o f
t he
p ieces
c ould
e asily
b elong
t o
o ther c lay o bjects l ike h andles o r l adles, t hey a re c atalogued h ere mainly b ecause t heir g eneral c haracteristics ( the c urving o f t he s urfaces,
t he existence o f h ollow p arts) p oint t o a ccepting
f igurine f ragments 1 .
L eg o f
a c lay f igurine o f
F rom T i, 2 .
( Plate 3 5d,m,
S tratum I I
( Fig.
L eg o f a c lay f igurine t he
F ig.
6 8:1-3).
t ypical 7 2:5,
( ?);
f orm ;
l ength 5 c m.
P late 3 6f).
l ength 0 .043 m .
t opsoil o f T i.
42
F rom
t hem a s
3 .
L eg o f
4 .
L eg o f a c lay T his
a c lay f igurine; t igUrine;
l ength 0 .043 m .
F rom t he
t opsoil o f T i.
h eight 0 .022 m .
F rom T i,
S tratum I I.
i s a c ylindrical p iece o f
c lay,
p robably f rom a s tanding f igure 5 .
L ower p art
o f
t he
l eg o f
0 .022
m .
F rom
t he
c lay,
b oth e nds,
7 2:3).
a c lay f igurine;
t here i s a n a ttached p iece o f h eight
d amaged a t
( Fig.
o n o ne s ide o f
p robably t he e nd o f
t opsoil
o f
S q.
I II
i t
t he arm ;
( Plate
3 5k,
F ig.
7 3:2). 6 .
P art o f
a c lay f igurine,
p robably s ection o f I II
L eg o f a c lay f igurine,
c ylindrical i n s hape w ith i ts b oth e nds
damaged;
m and
7 .
h eight
0 .02
( Fig.
t he a rm ( ?);
f rom t he t opsoil o f S q.
7 2:2).
t hickness
0 .01
m .
F rom
S q.
I II,
S tratum I I. 8 .
L eg o f a s tanding m ale S tratum I I
9 .
L eg o f ( Fig.
1 0.
( Fig.
( ?)
f igurine,
f rom t he c ircular s tructure,
7 2:7).
a c lay f igurine,
v ery f ragmentary,
f rom S q.
I ,
S tratum I I
7 2:1).
T wo c ylindrical c lay o bjects whether
parts
o f
f rom S q.
f igurines
o r
I ,
c lay
S tratum I I a nd
vases
i s
n ot
I II;
c lear
( Fig.
7 3:6,7). 1 1.
A n a rm o f
a c lay f igurine
S tratum I I 1 2.
1 3.
( Fig.
7 2:8,
A nimal f igurine
( ?),
f ound i n S q.
S tratum I I.
U pper p art p robably
I ,
( ?)
A n a rm o f
i ts o ne e nd;
m issing t he f ront
o f a s mall
small
f rom S q.
I ,
7 1:7,
s ide,
b lack i n c olour;
c lay f igurine w ith b ird-like a ppearance;
c ylindrical
i s w hitish ( Fig. 1 4.
b ent a t
P late 3 5c).
n eck
e nding
i n
a l ong
n ose .
T he
c lay
P late 3 5f).
a c lay f igurine
f ound
i n S q.
I ,
S tratum I I
( Fig.
7 2:9,
P late 3 51). 4 .2.1.
C onstruction m ethods:
I t
i s
q uality
o bvious
o f
manufacture
t he o f
f rom
c lay
t he
u sed
p ottery :
a ppearance
was
l ocal
t he c lay
o f
same f rom
t he
a s
f igurines
t hat
which
employed
t here
h as
n ot
t hat
t he
f or
t he
b een a ny
a ttempt t o c lear o ther p articles s uch a s small s tones and grit. t reatment o f t he s urface o f many o f t he f igurines, h owever, d ifferent . t races s eems
o f
wash o r
c ertain t hat
P etros t ar
I n s ome c ases r ed
a s
I ndeed,
d id n ot t he
impression
t he
r equire
o f
o f
s lip
( Plates
manufacture
o f
a d ifferent
material
s ome
t he f abric i s g ood
c reamy
t he
and
o ther
i dols
p rocess
i n
were
s urvived
v ery
b ecause
43
3 3a) . t he
f rom
t echnical
f igurines
having
w ith a s mooth s urface
3 2a ,
t hat o f
d etails b adly
o f
N evertheless,
s ettlement
a n
a nd i t
o f A gios
t he p ottery a s
were
b aked
The
i s q uite
c oncerned.
and
a ccidental
g ive
t he
f iring.
D epending o n
t he
t ype o f
f igurine d ifferent methods o f manufacture h ave
b een e mployed. The
usual
way
o f
b uilding
a
h ead,
i n
the
case
o f
the
a nthropomorphic r epresentations, was t o p repare a c lay r od a nd t hen t o a dd a p iece o f c lay which will f inally t ake t he f orm o f t he f ace with a ll
t he
f acial f eatures .
T his
i s
t he c ommonest
P etros f or most o f t he f igurine h eads c alled r od-head f igurine ( Plate 2 8).
t echnique u sed i n A gios
w ith o nly o ne e xception , t he s o I n t his c ase only o ne p iece o f
c lay was u sed f or b oth n eck a nd f ace o n which a ll t he f acial f eatures were
indicated.
a nthropomorphic
Apart
from
r epresentations
the
were
f igurine p robably
heads,
made
the
f rom
o ne
o ther
p iece
o f
unbaked c lay which was s haped i nto i ts f inal f orm ( I am r eferring t o t he s chematic o ne-piece f igurines I n t he
c ase o f
t he
( Fig.
6 7:1,2,4,5).
r epresentations
o f
arms,
t hese
were
s haped
s eparately a nd t hen c onnected t o t he main b ody b y t he u se o f s uccessive t hin l ayers o f c lay . However, t here a re c ases where a d ifferent t echnique
was
o bserved .
T hese
a re
t he
e xamples
o f
t he
l egs
o f
t he f at
f emale f igurines where i t was o bserved t hat a p iece o f c lay was u sed a s a nucleus t o which were a dded t hick l ayers o f c lay r epresenting t he f emale f lesh . A ll t he a bove t echniques a re well k nown i n n eolithic Thessaly
a nd
t hey
( Chourmouziades A s
i t
were
i n
u se
f rom
s aid,
t he
t he
early
n eolithic
p eriod
1 974).
h as
a lready
b een
d istribution
o f
t he
f igurine
f inds c overs t he whole s pan o f t he t hree c ultural p eriods o f t he s ettlement; s tylistically , h owever, t he m ajority o f t hem h ave a r ather early l ook : f eature f ound
l ate early o r early middle n eolithic i n N one
Sequence.
o f
t he
f igurines
o r h abitation l evel.
i s
a ssociated
F ive
o f
t hem,
w ith
t he Thessalian
a ny
however,
a rchitectural were
r eported
t ogether without a ny r eference g iven t o t he c ircumstances o f
t heir d iscovery. 4 .3.
S mall f inds: A g reat v ariety o f
s mall
f inds were r ecovered i n t he s ettlement o f
A gios P etros . T hey i nclude mainly s tone a xes, q uerns a nd p estles, c lay l adles a nd l egs, worked b one . O ther f inds s uch a s worked s hell, b eads a nd o rnaments,
s pindle whorls a nd d iscs o f c lay a nd s tone o ccur i n much
l ess q uantities. S tone t ools
( Plates 4 8a,
A t otal A gios i s
n umber
o f
2 2
M ost
o f
t hem
P etros .
d ifficult
4 9;
t o
c lassify
c hange c an b e d etected
s tone
t en axes
a nd
6 3F,G,H) t ools
a re
t hese
w ere
r ecovered
a xes ( 16) a nd t ools
t he
f rom
r est
t ypologically
t he
s ite
c hisels ( 6).
a nd
n o
o f I t
s ignificant
b etween t hose f rom S trata
S ix s tone a xes a nd f our while
F ig.
two
c hisels were a scribed
c hisels
c ome
f rom
t he
t o t he t hird s tratum
middle and t he
l ower
s tratum. The material u sed f or o rigin
a nd
p robably
c omes
t he a xes a nd most o f f rom
t he
44
i sland
o f
t he c hisels i s o f l ocal
P sathoura ,
n orth
o f
Kyra
P anagia .
I t
o ccur
t he
o n
i s
a r ed v olcanic s tone,
T hessalian
c ommon i n T hessaly c hisels s tone
m ade
t ools
o f
s oft
material
A gios P etros a re
f rom Thessaly d imensions a nd
v ery h ard t o work ,
a t
a ll .
G reen
which d oes n ot
s tone
which
( serpentine) .
s mall i n s ize,
t ime
Morphologically
( axes t ype A o f T sountas) ( 1908:309). t he f act t hat t hey w ere f inished a ll o ver,
s ome
b een u sed
o f
t hese
s tone
f or w ood c arving
Another
t ools
( Nandris
interesting
manufactured.
s o t he
m uch s maller t han t hose Their small may i ndicate
t hat t hey were n ot u sed f or r ough work s uch a s t ree-cutting; s ame
i s
i s C ompletely a bsent i n A gios P etros e xcept f or s ome
s uch
o f
mainland
e specially
t he
c hisels
a t t he
c ould
h ave
1 977:53).
point
concerns
S ome o f t hem s how s igns
o f
the
way
chisels
r e-use while
were
o thers
were
c learly m ade b y c utting a n a lready u sed a xe i nto t wo p ieces. W orked b one
( Plates 4 3a,
4 4,
4 5,
F ig.
6 3A,B)
A considerable number o f b one t ools were r ecovered f rom a ll t he t hree s trata o f Agios P etros.
They
c over
a v ariety
o f
t ypes
which
a ccording t o t heir u sage c an b e c haracterized a s p oints a nd c hisels. T he
c ommonest
( Plate 4 4, ( Plate
44,
Fig.
c haracterized a s n eedles
f orm
i s
t he p oint which c omes f rom
sheep metatarsal
F ig. 6 3A middle a nd b ottom r ow) o r a metatarsal c ut i n two b y
6 3B
t heir
top
right).
p ointed
e nd
These
a nd
t ools
i nclude
are
basically
a v ariety o f
f orms
s uch
( Plate 4 3 b ottom s ection).
There i s a n u ninterrupted u se o f metatarsals i n A gios P etros a s c an b e s een f rom t he animal b one material where t his k ind o f b one i s c ompletely m issing . l eather
p iercing,
P oints o f weaving,
d ifferent p ottery
t ypes c ould h ave
( decoration)
o r
b een u sed f or
t hey
might
a ssociated w ith a s pecial workmanship s uch a s r epairing f ish-nets.
b e T he
s ize o f p oints vary f rom 0 .04 m t o 7 .5 cm and t hey a ppear i n a ll t hree s trata. I t
i s
S tratum
i nteresting t o n ote,
I and
S imilarly,
I I,
f rom
t he
3 0
t he 3 2 b one
h owever,
a re
t hat
p oints
t ools o f
f rom t he
a nd
o nly
S tratum I II,
3 8
o ne
b one i s
t ools o f
a
c hisel.
t he 2 7 a re p oints a nd
o nly o ne i s a c hisel. C hisels
w ere m ade a lways f rom a whole
t ools
( Fig.
o ther
r ounded
h anging
b y
c onsidered
6 3B
t op
a nd
m eans a s
l eft;
P late
p erforated
o f a s tring
c hisels
which
4 2f).
b one
( Plate
t ibia a nd
There
t ools
with
4 5a,c,d,e) .
c hanged
s hape
d ue
t hey w ere c utting
was
a lso a number
i ncisions S ome
t o
o f
t heir
mainly
t hem
o f f or
might
c ontinuous
b e u se
( Plate 4 5c). T ools made o f h orn a re v ery b ovines s uch a s s patulae a ttributed
t o
t he a bsence o f
t he
l ack o f n eed
a re
l ong
S ome t hey
h ave
o ther a nd
a re
f or t hese t ypes
n arrow
b een
f unction s till
o f
t ools
c alled
r are ( Plate 4 2e) while t ools made f rom
c ompletely a bsent . c ertain k inds o f
t ypes worked
o f
" narrowed
a re
a s harp
t ools"
r emains o bscure.
45
a nimals
p henomena
c an
b e
( wild g oat) o r
t o
t ools.
b one
without
B oth
d ifficult e nd
t o
( Plate
( Evans-Renfrew
c lassify . 4 2g); 1 968)
T hey
e lsewhere b ut
t heir
Q uerns,
p estles,
p olishers,
g rinders
A n umber o f s tone q uerns o f
w ere
( Plate 4 7b,
4 8b)
f ound s tratified i n t he u pper s trata
t he s ite o f A gios P etros while many more were c ollected f rom t he
s urface.
L imestones and l arge p ieces o f s chistoliths were u sed f or
t heir manufacture; most o f t hem c onsist o f a s imple r ough s tone without any o ther f inishing . The t ypical g rinder was made o f a r ectangular s lab with a v ery s light d epression i n t he upper s urface. S ome o ther s tone implements f ound t ogether o r n ear with q uerns h ave b een u sed a s p estles.
They were made o f narrow p ieces o f h ard s tone
w ith s igns o f w ear a t
t he e dge.
Much more p lentiful were t he p olishers o r a t l east o bjects with s imilar a re
f unction
n atural
o f u se;
which
h ave
b een
f ound
t hroughout
t he
water-rolled s tones a nd p ebbles s ometimes
d eposit .
T hey
w ithout a ny s ign
p robably t hey were u sed f or p olishing and b urnishing ( Plate
4 8b, F ig. 6 3:4). O rdinary mortars h ave n ot b een f ound. There i s n o d oubt t hat t he i nhabitants o f A gios P etros w ere u sing a ll t hese s tone implements
f or g rinding
f ood a s w ell
p urposes
p robably n ot
o nly f or g rain b ut o ther
l ike a nimal b ones a nd s ea-food.
B eads a nd p endants
( Plates 4 5b,
4 6a,b,
F ig.
6 3:1-3)
A very small number o f p ersonal objects
was
r evealed
i n Agios
P etros. They i nclude a variety o f materials a nd f orms: s pherical b eads o f b one, p erforated f ishbone and s hells. P ierced l impets c an a lso
b e
c onsidered
a s
o rnaments
a lthough
i t
i s
d ifficult
t o
k now
whether t he p erforation was i ntentional o r not, b ecause t hey u sed t o b reak e xtremely e asily The f inds, p hase
i n
h owever,
t he
m iddle
( Plate 4 6f,g) .
were d esperately f ew t o a llow any p hase b y
c omparison. A small c lay b ead, unperforated, i s r eported f rom S q. I , S tratum
I ;
a s tone b ead was a lso f ound i n t he s ame a rea a nd s tratum .
I I,
S tratum I I t wo o bjects w ere r ecovered:
a b one o rnament,
F rom S q . 3 c m l ong,
p erforated, with parallel smooth i ncisions probably a p endant ( Fig. 4 5d) a nd a p art o f a s imilar b one o rnament w ith p arallel i ncisions, 2 cm
l ong.
F rom
antenna,
0 .032
r eported
( Plate
t he
same
m l ong, 4 5b) .
a rea
b ut
Another
I II
a p art
c ertainly
a f ine
i nteresting
t opsoil o f t he c ircular s tructure. t ool
S tratum
p erforated,
neolithic s ite o f Knossos h as R enfrew
1 968:222
F ig .
5 8:32) .
was
a l obster was
f ound
t he
i n
I t i s a b one o bject s haped l ike a
with a d eep i ncision o n t he upper p art
d escribed a s a k ind o f p endant.
f ind
o f
o rnament
( Plate
4 5e).
I t
c an b e
A n a lmost i dentical o bject f rom t he b een c lassified
A nother k ind
o f
t he
s ame
p endant
i s
way ( Evansa l ong c urved
b one 0 .075 m h igh a nd 0 .035 m wide w ith t wo h oles i n t he o ne e nd ( Plate 4 6a, F ig. 4 3:1). A s imilar object was r eported f rom S q. I , S tratum I I ( Fig. 63:2). A s urface f ind which i s p robably a p endant c onsists o f a c lay d isc with c urved s urface b earing two h oles and a d eep i ncision a long
i ts p erimeter;
W orked
s hell
Only
a
i ts d iameter i s 0 .031 m ( Plate 4 6b,
( Plate 4 6f,g; small
F ig.
p ercentage
F ig.
6 3:3).
6 2:1,2) o f
46
t he
s eashells
c onsumed
b y
t he
i nhabitants l impet o ther
o f
A gios P etros
s hells
with t he
e xamples,
was
worked .
c entral
h owever,
i t
p art
i s
T hey
a re
r emoved
d oubtful
b asically
( Fig.
whether
t he
p erforated
6 2:1) .
F or
s ome
p erforations
a re
n atural o r a rtificial . Two l impet s hells with a n i rregular h ole i n t he middle a re r eported f rom S q. I , S tratum I I ( Fig. 6 2:1) while a nother c omes
f rom T i,
S tratum I I
W eaving e quipment V ery
f ew
( Fig.
6 2:2).
( Plate 4 6c-e;
o bjects
c an b e
F ig.
6 2:3-6)
c atalogued
u nder
t his
c ategory .
mostly s pindle whorls o f c lay a nd v ery f ew l oom weights. i s s imple : c ircular o r c onical w ith a h ole i n t he m iddle . i s
n ot
v ery g ood
a nd
t he
s urface
q uite
r ough .
Most o f
T hey
a re
T heir s hape T he f iring t he objects
o ccur i n t he u pper s tratum a nd t he t opsoil. S ling s hots
( Plate 4 7a,
A c onsiderable
F ig.
n umber
6 3:5-7) o f
s ling
s hots
f rom
s tone
was
f ound
i n
t he
s ite o f Agios P etros. T hey were f ound t ogether i n g roups o f 5 o r 1 0 n ear f ireplaces, h abitation f loors o r o n t he h ardpan ( Plate 8 a). I t i s noticeable t hat a ll o f t hem are f rom s tone;
i n f act
t hey a re
r ound
p ebbles o f i rregular s ize c arefully s elected f or t hat p urpose . I f were f ound i solated i n d ifferent p arts o f t he p its i t would h ave difficult t o c onsider t hem a s s ling shots. r evealed d uring S tratum
t he d ig o f
I I a nd a nother
C lay l egs
( Plates
3 9,
1 971.
4 0a,
F ig.
A c onsiderable number i n
s hape
Thirty s ling s tones were
Twenty o f
t hem c ome f rom S q.
I II,
t en f rom S tratum I o f MT . 5 5,
o f
excavations in Agios P etros. c ylindrical
t hey b een
5 6)
l egs
o f
c lay was
r evealed d uring t he
They b elong b asically i nto two t ypes:
w ith a n arrowed d own p art ( sometimes
p ointed)
a nd
t riangular with f lat b ase . T he f abric i n most c ases i s v ery g ood with a c omplete f iring a nd a c areful t reatment o f t he s urface. S ome l egs have a p olished s urface with s igns o f t he u se o f r ed wash . H owever, t he majority o f t hem b ear t he t ypical c haracteristics o f t he l ocal c lay while s ome e xamples have t races o f t he t hick c reamy s lip which i s s o c ommon i n t he
p ottery making.
The t riangular t ype o f l eg i s l ess f requent and o ccurs a lways d ecorated w ith i ncised motifs f illed w ith white material . H owever, t he s ame
i ncised
employs f rom
t he
t echnique d ecorates
o blique
i ncised
l ines
i n o ne o ccasion a c ylindrical
i n
a v ertical
t op a nd c ontinues d own t o
s ame way a s
t he d ecoration o f
t he b ase
t he r od h ead
a rrangement ( Plate 3 9b ,
l eg;
which
F ig .
i t
s tarts
5 5:1),
t he
f igurine.
P ointed d ecoration a lthough v ery r are i s not c ompletely a bsent ( Plate 3 9a, F ig. 5 5:4);
i t f ollows t he t ypical t echnique u sed i n t he
c eramics n amely t he b ands o r l ines o f r ed p aint o n a c reamy s lip. i s
not
J udging ,
c ertain h owever ,
t he
k ind
f rom
3 6 :5) a nd a lso f rom what l egs
i n
t he
o f
vase
a m iniature i s
wider n eolithic
a lready c ontext,
t he
c lay
v essel k nown i t
l egs
which f or
t he
were
s urvived
i ntact
f unction o f
c an b e s aid t hat
I t
s upporting. t he
( Fig . c lay
t hey were t he
l egs o f t hree or f our l egged shallow vases o r s tands, t he f unction o f which i s n ot easy t o d etermine.
I t i s p robable t hat t he c ylindrical
4 7
l egs b elong t o f our l egged v ases while t he t riangular t o a vase with t hree
l egs. A s
t hat
f ar a s
t heir s tratigraphic d istribution i s
t hey w ere c ommon i n S trata I I a nd F rom
( Plate
S q.
3 9b,
b eautiful w hile
I ,
S tratum
F ig.
5 5:1).
p ainted
c lay
I II
l eg
t he p ointed e nd o f
C lay l adles T he very
o bjects
which
o f
a c lay
same
l eg
s quare,
c ylindrical
w ith
3 8,
a re
4 0a,
F ig.
s hape .
I ,
T he
p resented
d esign
( Plate 3 9a,
a
i s
l inear
F ig.
5 5:4).
5 7-60)
c haracterized
i n A gios P etros
a ppears
i ncised d ecoration
S tratum
t he l eg i s p ainted r ed
( Plates 2 4c,
c ommon
c omes
T he
c oncerned i t
I II.
a s
c lay
l adles
o r
t hroughout t he d eposit.
s poons
a re
They a re v ery
s imple i n f orm c onsisting o f a b owl which v aries i n s ize a nd e nds
i n a
r od o f c lay, t he h andle. The d ifferent t ypes owe t heir variation t o t he d ifferent t hickness o f t he h andle a nd t he s hape o f t he b owl which c an
b e
o val a nd
h andle i s
n o
h ad
d eep
a f orked
s pecial
o r
l ong a nd s hallow .
f orm
a s
t reatment o f
s ome
f inds
I t
may
t he s urface ;
i s n ot
s uggest
c lear whether t he ( Fig .
t he f abric ,
5 7:3) .
h owever,
T here
i s n ever
c oarse s omething which i s o bviously r elated t o t he u se o f t he l adle. Apart f rom t he c ase o f a f inely d ecorated c lay l adle ( Plate 4 0a, F ig. 6 0), t he r est o f t he material i s p lain . No f irm s tratigraphical o bservations
c an b e made r egarding
t heir d istribution .
H owever,
c oncentration o f a n umber o f t hem i n t he d eeper s tratum c an b e T ogether i n
t he
t hey
f orm
a re
w ith
o f
t he
l ong
n ot
l adles
t hin
b roken
h andles
r epresent s omething e lse . f ound
i n
a tion
b eing Ten
o ther
l adles i s
s ection
t he
o f
n et
a re
I t
o f
c atalogued a s eries o f
( Plate small
3 9g-h) .
l adles
i s n oticeable
s ites
without,
( Evans-Refrew r eported
I t o r
i s
t he
above
h andle
p attern
mentioned
a nd
t he
e xemplified
o ther
h owever,
e xcellent
a nd
t he
a p lausible
I and
p ainted i s
s ix
example
d ecorated,
f rom
T he e xecution o f I t
w as
f ound
A nother h andle b ears a n i ncised d ecoration ( Fig. M iniature p ots A n umber
b ut b een
e xplan-
t he n ext
Extremely
( Plate
i nside
t riangular motifs.
f ind u nique .
t hat
v essels
t hat s uch o bjects h ave
S tratum
walls i n
o bjects
p ossible
1 968:70) .
f rom
b rown a nd c omes o ft v ery e asily . i s
b een
o ne o f t hem i s a lmost c omplete ( Plate 2 4c).
b eautiful w ith
n eolithic
s uggested
S tratum I I;
h ave
c ylinders
a
s een.
T he
a nd
4 0a).
A
o utside,
p aint
i s
r ed-
t he d ecorative motif
i n T RENCH ,
S tratum
I I .
5 7:4).
( Plate 2 3c-f) o f
miniature
v ases w ere f ound i n t he u pper l evels
o f
t he
n eolithic d eposit o f Agios P etros. T hey are t iny objects with no a pparent u sefulness b ecause o f t heir s ize a nd t he l ack o f any h ollow p art which c ould h old s omething. and
t hey
were
s olid b ase a nd
made
o f
h ard
c lay.
They h ave a r ough s olid a ppearance They a re u sually o val with r ound
t hey are a lways undecorated.
The
miniature
p ots
o f
Agios P etros g ive t he impression o f c hild's t oys o r o f o bjects which were n ot c onnected i n a ny way w ith t he p ractical e veryday l ife o f t he i nhabitants.
48
A n
o bject
o f
a s omewhat
b asin w ith f our p ointed l egs c m
d iameter ;
( Fig.
t he
c lay
h as
d ifferent
c haracter
f ound i n S q . a b rown-red
V ,
A miniature v ase was i s 0 .03 m .
f ound i n MT , The
f ound i n T i,
c olour
a nd
i t
S tratum I I .
s hallow
i s
h eight
S tratum I ; i s
0 .039
a s ection o f
m ( Fig.
S tratum I ;
f ragment
m iniature
o f
a nother
t he c ircular s tructure
r ound w ith 4
r ather
c oarse
Under
t his
v ase
a lmost h alf
o f
a n est-like
was
f ound
i n
was
t he
was
2 3d).
A
t hird
s tratum
o f
worked
p ieces
o f
b one a nd c lay:
s ection will
b e
d escribed
a ll
the
c lear.
Small c lay o bject i n t he f orm o f a s pool, S tratum I II.
p robably
t he
i t,
vase
l ength i s 0 .04 m ( Plate
c lay a nd b one whose p urpose i s n ot
I I,
o f
r ounded b ase a nd r im s urvive .
Part
i ts
b ase a nd o ne o f
t he width o f
( Plate 2 3e).
V arious o bjects o f s tone,
s tone,
i ts
6 2:9).
T he
s urvive;
P art o f a nother m iniature v ase,
r ecovered f rom T i,
1 .
t he
3 6:5).
t he f our p erforated ( ?) v ertical handles b ase
i s
p robably a n a ltar ,
I t d oes n ot
a ssociated
with
4 .8 cm h igh,
f rom S q.
l ook a s p art o f a v ase a nd i t was
s pinning
a ctivities
( Plate
2 3f,
F ig.
6 1:7). 2 .
S tone object with a n o val s hape a nd p ointed end, p robably a t ool o f u nknown u se; i t w as f ound i n S q. I , S tratum I I ( Fig. 6 1:5).
3 .
B one
s mall
p laque
b earing
a s mall
r ound h ole
i s a d epression t ogether with a s mall b ump . b roken
i n i ts u pper p art.
f unction i s n ot c lear; 4 .
P robably i t was
i t w as
t here
f ound i n S q.
a t ool a lthough i ts
I ,
S tratum I I.
A r ound small s tone with two t iny h oles was r eported f rom S q. I , S tratum I I . u sed
a s
1 964: 5 .
while u nder i t
T he o bject i s c learly
I ts u se i s n ot c lear b ut s tone o vals a nd d iscs may b e
b urnishers,
2 37)
A c lay
( Fig.
b utton
swelling although f ound t he i s
i s
t he c ase a t
shaped
object.
l ike a s olid h andle
I I ( Fig. 6 1:1). without
a s
i n
a ny
t his
c ase
t he
o f u se .
P etros
i mpression a g ood
I t
a nd
h as
i t
a smooth
c omes
f rom
b ut
t he
n oticeable
t opsoil
o f
S q .
I ts g eneral a ppearance r ecalls t he " pintaderas"
s ign
i n A gios
o ther n eolithic s ites ( Evans
6 3:3).
o f
r eason
w ith a n
worn t o
b ottom
s urface
i s
c ompletely
S ome o ther s imilar f lat o val
s urfaces .
s uppose
t hat
s hape T heir t hey
a nd u se
smooth i s
were
f lat
c lay d iscs e dges
u nclear
w ere
g iving
b ut
t here
" burnishers"
( Fig.
6 1:2,4). 6 .
C ircular
" plate"
with f lat
t op a nd c oncave u nderside .
o f hard baked c lay o f r ather r ough a ppearance .
l id o r a f lat s tand f or p ots i t i s n ot e asy t o s ay. o f and
t he b ase i s 0 .05 m , t he
3 6:2) .
h eight
0 .014
t he d iameter o f m .
I t
was
f ound
A s omewhat s imilar o bject was
h owever,
I t
c onsists
Whether i t was a The d iameter
t he u pper s urface 0 .11 i n
MT,
S tratum
f ound i n s ummer
I I
1 981
m
( Fig. which ,
i s o f marble a nd l ooks more l ike a s mall q uern o r p alette
f or m ixing
c olours
( traces o f r ed p aint w ere
49
f ound i nside).
7 .
A worked h uman b one f ound i n S tratum I I o f m l ong and i t
s oftly p ainted.
i t
i s d ifficult
p urpose a nd f unction o f 8 .
C utting Z ;
h ad i ncisions o n t he t op while
i t was 0 .15
t he o ther end was
t o s uggest a nything a bout
i t a s a n o bject
t he
( Plate 4 5a).
A c lay " ear p lug" was f ound i n C utting Z ,
S tratum I I ( Fig. 6 9:6,
P late 3 7b). A number o f f inds which b elong t o a much l ater d ate t han t hat o f t he
n eolithic
s ettlement
a nd
mostly c ome
f rom
d isturbed
a reas,
mainly
a round t he C hristian b urial a re l isted b elow. 1 .
A s mall b all o f i ron f rom S q.
2 .
A l ump o f y ellow o chre w as
3 .
P art o f a b yzantine p late f rom c lay with i ts i nterior d ecorated
b urial i n T i. 4 .
I t c omes
S tratum I I.
f ound i n S q.
with g reen a nd y ellow p aint. h eight 0 .095 m .
I ,
f rom
S tratum I I.
Maximum l ength o f b ase 0 .10 m a nd t he d isturbed a rea o f
A s imilar p late was
A nother o bject found n ear
I ,
r eported
t he s ame b urial
t he b yzantine
f rom t he s ame a rea . i s a n i ron p laque o f
octagonal shape b earing on i ts one side two d ifferent r epresentations: i n t he u pper p art f our h uman f igures a nd b elow t he
f acade
o f
a b uilding .
b elt ( a n umber o f
b eads
P robably
d escribed
t he
b elow)
p laque o f
t he
was
t he e nd o f
monk
b urial
t he
f ound
i n T i. 5 .
A number o f 3 8 b eads o f b lack material c ome f rom t he b yzantine b urial. S ome o f t he b eads a re smaller t han t he o thers a nd o ften t races o f
6 .
t he
r ope a nd t he
A n i ron dagger was f ound n ear t he l eft l eg o f 0 .25 i n l ong while
7 .
c loth s urvive.
S ix
p ieces
o f
t he w idth o f
mudbricks
f rom
f rom t he s outh p art o f M T,
t he
b lade
a h ouse
t he b urial;
s uperstructure
n ear t he p aved a rea o f
50
i t i s
i s 0 .017 m . a re
r eported
S tratum I .
5 .
T HE A GIOS P ETROS C ULTURE:
5 .1 T he A gios P etros c ulture: The ' culture c oncept' was d efined s ome r ecurrent
a ssemblage
c onfusion
r egarding
F or
i t
o f
t ypes '
i ts
u se
i s g enerally not
i n
c lear
H owever,
t here
i s
s ome
a rchaeological p ractice ( Hodson 1 980) . when
e mpirical t erm f or a c ollection o f p urpose,
t ime a go b y C hilde a s ' a
( 1956). t he
t ypes,
word
c ulture
i s
u sed
a s
an
w ith a l imited c lassificatory
a nd w hen i t m eans a s ocial u nit.
I n t he c ase o f t he s ettlement o f A gios P etros t he t erm ' culture' h as
b een u sed
s tone
a nd
s imply
b one
t o
t ools
a llow
e tc .)
t he
a ssemblages
t o b e c onsidered
o f
a s ingle
t ogether,
s ite
( pots,
a nd d iscussed a nd
i nterpreted a s a w hole. Whether o r n ot Agios Petros i s o ne o f an umber o f o ther s ites i n t he a rea w ith s imilar a ssemblages which c an b e g rouped t ogether, n ot i n a p osition t o know.
we a re
We a re f aced with t he l ack o f o ther s ites
i n t he a rea, s ince Agios P etros i s t he only one o f t his k ind f ound s o f ar
i n
a nd
s etting
t he
S porades . o f
s ubmergence o f o f o thers .
T his
t he
i s
n ot
p rehistoric
c oastlines),
B ut what i s
s urprising s ite
s ummary o f
c onsidering
t he
o bvious
t he
p osition
r easons
( e.g.
which m ight h ave p revented t he p reservation
t he
u niqueness
o n what i s t hat u niqueness b ased? b rief
and o f
t he
s ite
o f
A gios
P etros
a nd
B efore a nswering t hat q uestion a
t he A gios P etros f inds w ill
b e n ecessary.
5 .2 C ultural a ssemblage: T he a rchitectural
r emains
a re v ery s canty .
S tone f oundations
b een f ound which a re a pproximately r ectangular i n p lan , s tructures
h ave
a lso
b een
s tructure
u sed
a re
l imited;
u ncovered .
H earths,
o bserved.
o vens
I ndications
o nly
a nd
a f ew
h abitation
o f
t he
p ieces
f loors
o f
a re
h ave
a lthough c urved k ind
o f
s uper-
mudbrick f requent .
were A part
f rom t he o ccupation d ebris, neolithic b urials were d iscovered: c hild
b urials
n atural f ound i n
were
b edrock a nd
s cattered
h earths
f ound t he
i n
a c ontracted
o ther
i n d ifferent
t ogether with
p roportion
o f
f ine
a nd
wares
I t i s
p ainted c oarse
t he
p arts
t hose
t he p ottery v aries f rom g ood c haracter i s c lear .
i n o f
o f
p osition ,
t opsoil . t he
O ther
d eposit
a nimals .
b ases . t he
T he
small
t ypical
p ieces
T he while
a nd d istinctive b owl,
v ery
c ommon .
The
f ormer t he
s uch a s P erhaps
t he
c ondition
o f i ts
i s
i ncludes
b urnished
c haracterized
b y
r ed
There i s a variety o f s hapes t he
s hape
o f
s uch a s o pen b owls
a nd with r ound o r r ing
A gios
P etros,
h owever,
i s
C ollared jars with a h igh o r low neck a re
handles
l ugs a re l ess t he most
t he were
e ither n ear walls o r
c ategory
l atter
i nclude
a v ariety o f
h andles with vertical p erforation a re well t ypes
b ones
with a r ound o r l ow r ing b ase a nd a s light
c arination near i ts base. a lso
two
o n
b asically r ed monochrome with a c onsiderable
s herds .
s ides and o ften e verted r ims,
e legant
h uman
A lthough
majority o f t hem b eing b owls o f d ifferent t ypes, s traight
r esting
t o v ery b ad d ue t o h eavy i ncrustation ,
p aint on a t hick c reamy b ackground. with
o ne
f orms:
s trap
r epresented while o ther
f requent.
i nteresting a spect o f
t he decoration o f t he p ainted wares.
5 1
t he A gios P etros p ottery i s
L inear motifs a re p redominant
a lthough
wavy
c ommon .
C haracteristic i s t he execution o f
l ines,
net d esigns and
which r ecall weaving p rototypes . o n
t he
c haracteristic
t echnique:
c urvilinear p atterns a re a lso s ome d ecorative motifs
T he p ainted d ecoration mostly a ppears
c arinated
b owls
a nd
i t
a lways
b rownish o r r ed p aint o n a c reamy o r
A v ery f ew
s herds
employs
t he
s ame
b uff c ream b ackground .
b ear a d ifferent d ecoration , n amely ,
i ncised l ines
i n
h orizontal a nd o blique a rrangements, o r b ands f illed with p ointi ng dots.
P lastic d ecoration i s a lso v ery r are;
t he f orm o f f our .
a pplied p lastic p ellets,
i t c an o nly b e s een i n
a rranged i n g roups o f t hree o r
S ome p ieces b earing a d ecoration i n t he f orm o f a l ow r elief
l ine a re
c onsidered
t he o nly e xamples o f
The r est o f t he material f igurines
s how
a
c haracteristics. t radition
o f
G reek
h ave a s trong l ocal
r emains a re n o l ess i nteresting.
c onsiderable S ome o f
t he
i mported p ottery.
variety
o f
f orms
a nd
t hem a re c losely r elated
mainland,
f lavour,
i n
t o t he f igurine
p articular T hessaly,
b earing,
a t
t he s ame
The
i ndividual
t ime,
while
o thers
f eatures
which
c an b e t raced i n t he o ther d irection t o t he Anatolian c oast ( eastern A egean i slands, A sia M inor) . Moreover, o ne f igurine s hows c onnections w ith t he a rea o f The t he
b one
s outhern B alkans.
t ools a re a lso o f a d istinctive
Thessalian
mainland.
metatarsals
was
l ikely
t hese
t hat
r ecovered w ere
s uch a s w eaving o r n et T he
A l arge
c hipped
t hroughout
a ssociated
t ype n ot a t a ll c ommon o n o f
awls
made
f rom
t he n eolithic d eposit;
with
r epairing.
s tone
number s ome
s ort
o f
sheep
i t i s v ery
s pecialized
work
B one p oints a re a lso v ery f requent.
i ndustry
c entres
p redominantly
o n obsidian
although a v ariety o f f lints and quartz p ieces h ave b een u sed f or t he manufacture
o f
t ools.
The
obsidian
t echnology
shows
nothing
d istinctive a nd most o f t he a rtifacts b ear a s imple r etouch o n b oth s ides;
h owever,
a g reat m any b lades a re w ithout
S tone t ools a re a lso c ommon .
s econdary w orking.
Most o f t he a xes, a lthough small,
a re v ery well worked a nd may i ndicate wood c arving . G round i mplements are p lentiful and i ndicative o f t he e veryday a ctivities o f t he i nhabitants c lay,
s uch a s g rinding a nd f ood p reparation .
O ther f inds made o f
b one and s hell s uch a s s pindle whorls, p endants, o rnaments and
l adles a re
l ess
c ommon,
while t he absence o f
s uch f eatures a s
f ish
h ooks a nd wasted weights which might h ave b een e xpected i n as ite o f t he n ature o f A gios P etros 5 .3.
i s p articularly s triking.
E nvironment a nd l ife: There a re f ew i ndications o f what t he n ature o f t he environment
might
h ave
b een o n t he i sland o f Kyra P anagia s even t housand
y ears
a go .
C onclusions d rawn f rom a l imited s tudy o f p hytoliths ( Appendix I I, P art I II) must n ot b e o ver-emphasized a nd t he r esults o f t he f lotation which was
c arried
o ut
i n
s pecific
p arts
o f
t he d eposit,
mainly
t he
h earths,
i n t he s ummer o f 1 981, were d isappointing . A lthough i t i s s urprising t hat n othing was r ecovered we must b ear i n m ind t he s easonal c hange o t t he s uch
c limate
f rom
r emains .
d ry
T hus
t o
wet
a lmost
which d oes a ll
t he
n ot
f avour
a vailable
t he
e vidence
p reservation i s
i ndirect
o f a nd
i s d rawn f rom what i s known generally a bout t he r egion o f G reece a t t hat
t ime
( UNESCO-FAO
1 963:
1 4,
B intliff
5 2
1 977).
C hange i n t he s ea l evel d oes n ot t he
l andscape
o f
t he
i sland
a ctivities a re c oncerned .
a s
s eem t o h ave d ramatically a ltered
f ar
a s
T he e stimated
t he
f arming
and
p astoral
1 0 m l owering o f t he s ea l evel
( Appendix I ) c ertainly would h ave i ncreased t he f arming c apabilities o f t he
i sland
b y
e nlarging
t he s ize o f
t he e xisting
t wo v alleys ( Plan I I);
h owever, b ecause o f t he p redominantly r ocky character o f t he r est o f t he
i sland i t
h ave
b een
i s
c ertain t hat a ny a lteration o f t he l andscape would
l imited .
T here
i s
n o
i ndication
would h ave b een s ubstantially d ifferent
t hat
f rom
t he
g razing
t oday 's.
a ctivities
T he t wo e xisting
v alleys well s upplied w ith f resh water were i deal f or g rowing wheat a nd b arley,
a nd
s prings
w ere d etected i n t he a rea n ear
f or g razing c attle .
I n t he s ummer o f t he
1 981
s ettlement
l ong v alley i n t he s outh eastern p art o f
t he
b ay.
many u nderwater a nd
c lose
t o
t he
A lthough c aretul
measurements were n ot c arried out, t here s eemed t o b e a q uantity o f f resh water despite the dryness o f the season. Although the c ultivation o f i ndirect
c ereals
e vidence,
i t
l ike
wheat
i s a r eal
and
b arley
i s
I n many n eolithic s ites elsewhere i n Greece emmer
wheat
R enfrew,
a nd
1 966:
t wo-row 2 1).
b arley
T he
suggested
o nly
by
p ossibility .
- c onstitute
S porades,
t he
h owever,
c rops
- b asically
p rincipal
have
not
c ereals
( J.
f avoured
t he
g rowth o f s uch p roducts f or h undreds o f y ears. The main r eason f or t his must l ie i n t he l ack o f e xtensive l owlands a nd t he p reoccupation o f
t he
i nhabitants
with maritime
b uilding a nd with p asturage ; t heir l imestone s tructure a re
a ctivities
t hey h ave s uffered f rom e xtensive
d enundation .
which
s oil
a re
o ften
c onsidered
s uch a s
f ishing,
s hip
moreover t he h ighland a reas b ecause o f b y t heir n ature p oor i n f ertile s oil a nd
i deal
f or
T erra
c rop
r ossa d eposits
p roduction C l .
R enfrew,
1 973B :149) d o e xist i n t he two n arrow v alleys o f Kyra P anagia a nd a lso i n H alonnesos b ut t hey a re l imited i n s ize . A l arge n umber o f q uerns, a nd rubbers which might have b een used t o grind g rain were f ound a t A gios P etros, s ickle b lades o f o bsidian a nd f lint were a lso r ecovered, t hough not many . I f t hese o bjects a re t o b e a ssociated with t he p rocess o f h arvesting a nd u tilising c rops, t he e xistence o f s uch c rops a t t he n eolithic s ite o f A gios P etros b ecomes a s trong p ossibility. Although p ossible
t hat
p estles
were
t he t he
p ractice a bove
u sed
f or
b reaking a nimal b ones
o f
f arming
i s
implements
o r
p reparing
o ther
t o e xtract
a t
n ot
d isputed,
l east
t he
s orts
o f
s tone
i t
i s
a lso
g rinders
f ood,
f or
t he marrow o r p roducing f ood
a nd
example f rom
s ea
s hells. I t
i s
a lso
c ertain
t hat
o ther
v egetable
f oods
o f t he n eolithic i nhabitants o f Agios P etros, f rom
l ack
o f
p rotein .
elsewhere
in
G reece
almonds,
which
are
R enfrew,
s till
s upplemented
t he d aily d iet .
l andscape
a ll
o f
t he
1 936:
o n
o live 5 8)
a wild
i t
o f
i n
t he
i s
h ard
f orm,
e ven
t he
present
a s
e scape early
wild
in
Kyra
O live t rees a re
S porades
n eolithic t o
1 966)
i slands
p eriod
h as
n ot
n ot
d iet
b een
f igs
must
f eatures
a lthough y et
s urvive
l ike
Panagia,
t he a ssumption t hat b ack
d o
f ruits
p ermanent
a nd
t he
who p robably s uffered
A lthough a ctual examples
( J.
c ompleted
t he
p roved
t he
b eginning
o f
t he
Thessalian
o f
have o f
t he
c ultivation
t hey w ere
a s
a s and
( Vickery, t here ,
t he
i n
middle
n eolithic p eriod. Although
t he
p lant
r emains
53
mainland
a re
s ubstantial m iddle a re
a nd
well d ocumented - d espite t he l ack o f s amples f rom
n eolithic
d eposits
c onsidered
c areful
i n
p art
o f
e xtrapolating
i nhabitants
of
( J .
t he
R enfrew, s ame
f rom
1 973B :
1 62)
g eographical
t he
mainland
a s ettle ment
c an
b e
- a nd
r egion
e vidence .
t he
we
T he
dictated
not
S porades
h ave
t o
d iet
o f
only
b e t he
by
t he
a vailability o f v arious species o f p lants and ani mals i n the s urrounding r egion b ut a lso b y t he impact which t heir e xploitation m ight
h ave o n t he
o verall e conomic
l ife o f
t he s ite .
F or i nstance
t hey
c ould h ave p lanted wheat a nd b arley o r p ractised f ishing a nd g razing a nimals, b ut i t i s h ard t o t ell what t he r elative i mportance o f t hese a ctivities might h ave b een i n a n i solated a nd n umerically small c ommunity . Moreover i f t his were a s easonal s ettlement t he whole p roblem c hanges c onsiderably s ince i t must b e a sked which o f t he n ecessary p rovisions were B ut w e s hall The b reeding t o
r eturn
t o
abundant
r emains
e conomy .
D uring
s tratigraphical
d istribution a ttempt
t ransported a nd
t hese q uestions
which
was
r ecovery .
made
o f
t he
a nimal 1 981
b ones
f ound
i ndicates
t ill
the
t hen ;
b reakage
a t
d uring
i n t he s ite a re,
a mixed
a s
t he s ame
t he
might
( Appendix I I).
m ajority
t hat
r espect
Agios
( Appendix I I, s pecies .
I n
P etros
T able 3 ).
mainland r atios
h igher .
t he
O nly
d eer
make
( Dan ia
make
a grees
S esklo
with o ther a re
t he
a nd A chilleion
b one
o nly
dama),
t he
3 %
s pecimens o f
l ess
t he
t han
1 %,
b een
most
wild s pecies
t he
b ones;
w ere
T hese a nd
i s
i n
s ites
s imilar
t o
a bout
t wice
w ere o nly s lightly
i dentified
i bex
b e e xpected,
c ommon d omestic
p igs
r emains .
wild
o f
r emains
s econd
s amples,
h ave
a nimal
t ime a n
Greek neolithic
b ut a t A gios P etros p ig r emains
t hree u p
u p
T he p ercentage o f c attle
while p ig r emains
a s c ommon a s c attle, s pecies
g oats
bone
a rchaeological
p roportion o f
a nd
p aid
animal
b asically d omesticated a nimals with a s mall S heep
s tock
a ttention was
concerning
b een o verlooked
t o a void s econdary
The animals
( see s ection 5 .4).
c ampaign s pecial
considerations
h ad
which were a vailable l ocally .
l ater o n
a s
d og .
i nclude
g oat
W ild f allow
( Capra
i bex
-
C apra a egagrus) 1 .30% a nd a v ery f ew b ones o f b irds ( Shag-Phalacrocorax a ristotelis) a nd o ther unidentifiable s pecies l ess t han 1 % . P erhaps t he
most
i nteresting
s pecimens
a re
t hose
o f
e ither
i bex
o r
wild
g oat .
A lthough t hey a re l imited i n n umber ( twelve b ones) t heir p resence i s i mportant t he
a s g ood e vidence
i slands o f Prasso,
w ild g oat
r emains a t
f or h unting i n t he a rea o f Kyra P anagia , a nd
G ioura, P iperi.
t he
s ite,
I t i s n ot s urprising t o f ind
c onsidering
t heir
c ontinued
p resence
o n
t he n earby i sland o f G ioura. A lthough A gios P etros was a maritime c ommunity t he l ack o f o bjects a ssociated
i n a ny way with f ishing a ctivities
f ish
o r
a s
h ooks
n et
r ole .
t ypical
s inkers,
h ave
o f
s tones
n umber u sed
t he
r ound
b een
l ocal i n
p ractices
t he
l ike
f ound ;
f ishermen
f or
c hipped
s tone
t he
i s
a lso
mainly
v ertebrae .
i t
S aliagos
r emarkable
b elong
t o
N evertheless
b ig i t
c omes
which
i s
a s
a s urprise .
m ight
p ossible,
h ave
s ame
p urpose.
i ndustry
c an
h owever,
f ish
f ish
a nd
b ones h ave
w ould a ppear t o
5 4
A t
b e
t hat
a
a re
a s
1 968: s o
b een
t reatment a re
t he
r elated
o bsidian p oints
( Evans-Renfrew,
t hat
N o
b een u sed
b ig p ebbles p layed a s imilar
w ithout a ny o ther s pecial t he
s uggested u se o f
t he n eolithic s ite o f I t
w eights,
i n t he f orm o f
E ven t oday s imple s tones b y
n othing
They
w aisted
s ame t o
t ime,
f ishing
l eister-heads a t
7 9).
f ew
i n A gios P etros.
i dentified
a s
b e h ighly i mprobable
t unny t hat
a
c ommunity s o c lose t o t he s ea c ould h ave i gnored t he c apabilities o f t he s ea a s b ones
s ource o f
must
e vidence
n ot
o f
q uantities
b e
f ood .
exploitation
t hroughout
p layed a n important P etros.
A t
I n s ome
t he s ame t ime t he p resence o f t unny f ish
o veremphasized t he
o f
n eolithic
r ole a s
c ases
( Appendix
molluscs
a f ood
I I).
which
d eposit.
s ource
I t
f or
There
were i s
t he
i s
a lso
f ound
i n
c ertain
t hat
i nhabitants
t hey were f ound smashed,
a f act
i ndicate d ifferent methods o f u sing t hem a s f ood.
t he
g reat
o f
t hey A gios
which might
The main s pecies
i nclude l impets a nd s ea s hells which c an e asily b e o btained f rom t he r ocky c oastal a reas a round t he s ettlement with t he h elp o f a s imple p ointed
t ool o r e ven a s tone.
G enerally
s peaking
i t
s eems
p robable
t hat
f ishing
a round
t he
i sland o f K yra P anagia was n ever s olely r elated t o a ny s pecific s pecies whether
i t
was
p reference r epertoire
o f o f
migratory
o r
any
s pecies
f inds.
E ven
s easonal
c an
b e
t oday
t he o nly
f ollowed i n t he a rea o f t he S porades, c atching
p rocedures
i slands a nd
b ecause
t hese
i n v ery d eep w aters
There
i s
e vidence
o f
a nd
no
d etected
e vidence
i n
t he
f ish whose
t he t unny,
movements
s uggesting
a rchaeological movements
c an
b e
r equires e laborate
o ccur
q uite
f ar
f rom
t he
( Plan V ).
s pecialization
i n
A gios
P etros.
The
c haracteristic b one p oint with a s omewhat s tandardized f orm i s v ery l ikely n et
h ave
b een u sed
f or
r epairing
t o
a lthough
o ther
s upporting s pindle were o f
e vidence
whorls
n or
p lentiful
t he
i n
wool a nd
s ome o f
f or
f inds
t hese
waisted a ll
s pecialized
t he s kin o f
c ould
s uch a s w eaving o r have
b een
u sed
a ctivities a re n ot p lentiful:
weights
s trata
a ctivities
which
a nd
t he
a re
t hey
s heep ,
c ommon . a re
B one
p robably
t hough
i t
t hem were r elated t o f ishing a ctivities,
t ools,
r elated
i s
a lso
a s
n either h owever ,
t o
t he
p ossible
u se t hat
a nd w ere f or r epairing
f ishing n ets . T his h ypothesis, h owever , d epends o n t he a vailability o f c ertain materials f or t he c onstruction o f n ets; whether t hey were made o f l inen o r o f v egetable f ibres
t hey would h ave r equired a c onsiderable
d egree
e xperience
o f
s pecialization a nd
m aintenance .
U nlike
S aliagos,
t he
s ite
f or
o f
t heir
A gios
manufacture and
P etros
i s
s urrounded
b y d eep s ea with s trong c urrents a nd e ither t he n ets were u sed o n a l imited s cale within t he p roximity o f t he b ay, o r i n d eep water, i n which c ase a n e xperienced a nd l ong e stablished t radition o f f ishing a nd u se o f b oats must b e a ssumed . T he l ast would p robably i mply t hat t he i nhabitants
were h eavily d ependant o n t he s ea f or f ood s upplies f or
w hich t here i s F or wares s ome
l ittle e vidence.
w eaving,
may
o ffer
h owever, s ome
t he
s upporting
d ecorative
p atterns
e vidence .
T he
o n
c arinated v ases c ould s uggest woven p rototypes k ilims
( Fig.
5 :1) .
c ertain c eramic
p ainted
On a b ackground
o n
t extiles
a nd
s core o f
wavy l ines were d esigned i n t he s ame way a s t he s uccessive
l ines o f t hread p roduce t he t extile;
o f
d ecoration
i n t he f orm o f net
p atterns
a
i t h as b een suggested t hat t he
net-like" f abrics were p roduced b y matting r ather t han t rue w eaving t echniques ( Burnham, 1 965: 1 71). H owever, t he p ossibility o f t hese c omplex
d ecorative
b e d iscounted. C atal
Hüyük
( Coleman,
i n
1 977:
motifs
b eing
b ased
o n
b asketry
p rototypes
I t i s n oticeable t hat t he earliest Anatolia 1 17)
( Mellaart,
1 967:
2 18)
must
and
Keos
i n
Greece
a re p lain s ince t hey w ere e asier t o m echanize.
55
n ot
t extiles f ound i n
T he
e xcellent
t echnical
q uality
o f
many
o f
t he
p ainted
s herds
i n
c onjunction w ith t he c areful e xecution o f c omplicated d ecorative motifs s hows t he
t hat
t he
p roduction o f
i nhabitants
l ocally
o f
f rom
p ottery was
t he s ettlement .
t he
r ich
c layey
h igh among
t he
T here i s n o d oubt
s oil
o f
t he
r ed
p riorities
t hat
i t
o f
was
made
Mediterranean
t ype
( Bridges, 1 970 : 5 8), a part f rom a v ery f ew p ieces which were c ertainly imported. Most o f t he s herds h ad a s trong mechanical b urnishing p robably d one b y s tone o r c lay b urnishers ( Fig. 4 8b). T he e xcellent d ecoration c an b e e xplained e ither a s t he r esult o f a l ong e stablished t echnical
t radition
t he s ite o r b y u nknown
t o
u s
whose
A gios P etros . i s
e lsewhere
c haracteristic
B oth h ypotheses
t o substantiate. course
e volved
a nd
b rought
b y
t he existence o f a l ocal c entre o f
Pottery k ilns
not
too
p ottery
a re v ery have
s urprising
r eached
t empting n ot
s ince
b e
t he
o ccupants
t he
s ettlement
o f
t hough v ery d ifficult
d iscovered
i t
t o
p roduction a s y et
i s
b ut
obvious
t his
that
o f the
a rchaeological material c omes f rom t he e dge o f t he s ettlement; nucleus o f t he s ite i s s ubmerged. e xceptional
s kill
a nd e xperienced
p otters ;
t hey managed t o p aint t he c anvas-like t hese t hin s traight l ines ( Fig. 6 :1). a h air
o f
any
s ort
which was
a pplied o n t he c reamy s lip. o f
a s tamp
s urface .
s atisfactory
e xplaining t he A ll t he
i s
s till
n ot
c lear
h ow
f irst
p ut
i nto t he r ed p aint a nd t hen
N either i s t here any e vidence o f t he u se
a nswer
c an
t his d ecorative e ffect o n t he
b e
p ut
f orward
a t
t his
s tage
f or
t echnique u sed.
t hese p roblems,
w ider
i t
b ackground o f t he v ases with a ll I t was c ertainly n ot a b rush or
which c ould h ave p roduced
N o
t he
The d ecoration, h owever, r equires
i ssue
o f
I t hink ,
t he n ature
a re d irectly o r i ndirectly r elated
o f
t he
s ettlement
o f
A gios
P etros .
t o Was
i t a p ermanently o ccupied s ite w ith a n e stablished a nd v iable p attern o f s ocial, e conomic and c ultural activities o r was i t t he s easonal maritime c amp o f a g roup whose e conomy was b ased o n a mobile way o f l ife? 5 .4.
N ature o f
t he
s ite:
The s ite o f Agios P etros was b uilt o n t he s hores o f a s outhward facing
bay
o bservations
on
the
have
i sland s hown
n eolithic p eriod was
o f
Kyra
t hat
t he
Panagia.
l evel
p robably 1 0 m l ower
o f
Geomorphological
t he
s ea
i n
t han t oday a nd
t he
t he
e arly
s ettlement
o ccupied t he main p art o f a small h arbour. Moreover t here a re i ndications which show t hat t he houses were b uilt more o r l ess i n a s emicircle o n t he s lope, o rientated t owards t he s ea w ith t he d iameter o n t he waterline p robably t o mark f ull u se o f t he a nchorage ( Appendix I ,
F ig.
2 ).
T he
h arbour i tself
was p robably n ot d eep.
N o s igns o f
harbour works s urvive, and i t i s unlikely t hat t here would h ave b een any .
P robably i t
i s more r easonable t o a ssume t hat t he l ight b oats
were b eached s o t hat n o s pecial c onstruction was needed. T he bay i s extremely s afe f or a ll s orts o f weather a nd t he e stablishment o f t he s ettlement must h ave b een i nfluenced T he
p eople
l iving
t here
would
h ave
t he s ite i n t he northern S porades, c onsiderable
k nowledge
and
f or s ea t ravel i n n eolithic u sed a t
t hat
t ime
i s
n oticed
t heir
e xperience
t imes
i s u nknown ;
b y t hat f actor.
n ot
t he
c hoice
u nique p osition o f
o f
s ite
o f s eafaring . a vailable .
r eflecting
D irect e vidence
T he
t ype
o f
b oats
a nd we w ill p robably n ever k now whether
56
i t
was
c raft
l ong made
b oats
a s
i n
p ossibly o f
t he n arrow s ea
l anes
t he
b ronze a ge ( Renfrew,
r eeds
( Sordinas,
1 970 :
b etween t he S porades .
1 972 :
3 1)
T he
3 57) o r
which
were
p resence
s maller c rossing
o n t he s ite o f
b ones f rom r elatively l arge animals - s heep and e specially c attle r aises
t he q uestion a s t o h ow t hese a nimals were t ransported t o t he
i sland,
s ince
i t
i s
f rom e lsewhere.
c ertain
t hat
t hey
were
i ntroduced
t o K yra
P anagia
T he s ea l ane b etween Halonnesos a nd Kyra Panagia i s
over 1 50 i n d eep and i t was n ot dry l and e ven i n p alaeolithic t imes i f we
a re
t o a ccept
1 981:
4 1).
b oats
l arge
t he r atio o f
e nough
t o
c arry
i s a lways t he p ossibility d istance, i s n ot,
s ea
l evel c hange f or t hat
S even t housand y ears a go l ivestock t hat
p eriod ( Cherry ,
t hey would c ertainly have u sed a cross
t he
s ea .
A lthough
t here
t he a nimals were f orced t o swim
s omething which t hey a re
t heoretically c apable a t
Ib elieve, v ery l ikely f or p ractical r easons.
t he
d oing,
t his
The c urrent i n
t he s ea l ane b etween Halonnesos and Kyra P anagia i s very s trong, d istance
c onsiderable
a nd
t he
t ransfer
o f
a nimals
c ould
n ot
t he
have
b een
a n e asy m atter. The e xistence o f e ssential
importance
i sland
K yra
o f
r easonably e ffective b oats would h ave b een o f
n ot
P anagia
o nly
b ut
t o
a lso
s ustain t o
c ommunal
e xplain
t he
l ife
s igns
o n
o f
c ontacts which t he a rchaeological material b etrays. f oundation o f t he
t he
w ide
r emote
c ultural
Even more t he
t he s ettlement i tself must b e c onsidered a s t he r esult o f
p revalence
o f
c ertain e conomic
c onditions
s uch a s
t rade
p otentialities h ad b een a lready a ppreciated a nd e stablished .
whose
I t may b e
t hat s eafaring i n t he f orm o f t he u se o f a s imple c raft g oes b ack t o p alaeolithic
t imes
i n
t he
a rea
o f
t he
northern
S porades.
S ince
e stimates o f t he s ea l evel 2 0,000 y ears a go a re c ontinuously f alling ( Shackleton
- V an A ndel,
1 980 :
3 57),
i t
b ecomes
i ncreasingly
p robable
t hat t he d epth b etween Halonnesos and Kyra P anagia was c onsiderable ( 60-90 m ) e ven a t t hat t ime.
I ndeed i f t he p roposed new s ea l evel o f
a bout 9 0 m i s a dopted i nstead o f t he
1 36 m ( Flemming, 1 973:
1 ) which
was a ccepted until n ow, t hen t he existence o f ad eep s ea l ane e ven i n t hat early s tage b etween t he N evertheless p roblems
s hort d istances,
f or
mobile
h unting g rounds p erhaps
t his
s eafaring . o ccupation
a s
c hallenge
o f
t he
l ooking
which
A egean
a nd
1 981:
f or
i slands
r egional
a nd
t he
r easons
t he
t o
h ave
p ossibility.
s helters
o ccupied
t hat
impetus
t he
a nd
g eneralizations
which
r emote
f or
p roblem
c onclusions
a re
p rimitive
o f
b ased
b etter i t was
t he
e arly
o n
u nqualified
o ften
misleading
t o minimize l ocal p eculiarities . e xplain
n eolithic s ite i n t he s ame a rea a re n o d oubt may
a s trong
w ould h ave p osed n o s erious
t emporary
c reated
a pproaches
4 1) b ecause t hey s eem
However,
b ecomes
t he p alaeolithic f inds o n K yra P anagia s how;
S tatistical
c hronological ( Cherry,
g roups
i slands
h owever d eep,
i sland
t he
e stablishment
much more c omplex .
e ither
b ecause
o f
a
P eople
t here
was
a
movement o f population i n t he wider r egion o f T hessaly i n t he e arly n eolithic p eriod f rom t he mainland t owards t he c oastal a reas d ue t o e conomic
r easons
( Chourmouzades,
1 971B :
1 65)
o r
b ecause
t he
r egion
o f
t he n orthern S porades was a lready o ccupied f rom p revious p eriods b y c ommunities which w ere a lready e xploiting t he e cological p otentialities o f
t he
o f
t he A egean i slands i s a b ig o ne ( Evans,
b een
a rea .
T he
i nevitably
p roblem
r elated
o f
t he
c olonization a nd
w ith wider
c ultural
1 973,
t he
o ccupation
s ince
p rocesses s uch a s
i solation a nd i ndependent d evelopment ( see s ection 8 ) .
5 7
e arly
1 977) A s
i t
h as
c ultural
f ar a s A gios
P etros
i s
c oncerned
K yra P anagia
a nd
o f a p ermanent
i t
i s
p ossible
p robably o thers n ature;
f rom
t he
s ite
which
A egean
was
i slands
f ounded
a s
w ell
o n
w ere
e xploiting a n ewly e stablished e conomic a nd
c ultural o rder i n t he A egean , b enefiting
t hat
o n o ther
emerging
a dapting t hemselves
e conomic
a nd
t o n ew c onditions a nd
s ocial
s ituations.
Another
p ossibility i s t hat t hey were s easonal c amps i ndicative o f a k ind o f mobility d istant
o f
s ome
s ections
o f
t he
p opulation
i nherited
f rom
t he n ot
s o
p ast.
E ither lack o f
p ossibilities
i s
a dequate data .
d ifficult
I ndividual
p rovide s ome e vidence,
which,
t o
s ubstantiate
s ites
such
a s
b ecause
Agios
o f
t he
P etros
may
h owever, c annot b e u sed a s a b asis f or
g eneralizations . T he b ody o f i nformation which d oes e xist a nd r efers t o t he s ocio-economic c onditions o f t he a rea must b e a lways u sed i n r elation t o t he a vailable d ata f rom e ach i ndividual s ite. Was
A gios
P etros
a s easonal
o r a p ermanent
s ite?
D espite
r ecent
s uggestions a bout c riteria f or d eciding t he s easonality o f a s ettlement ( Bökönyi,
1 972 :
1 21),
p roblem a re f ar f rom d istribution b ias
a nd
o f
s uch c riteria f or a c omprehensive a pproach t o o bjective .
a nimal
b ones
o ften misrepresent
interpretation
o f
t he
d epending o n whether t he i s
v ery
post
d ifficult
and
e xchange
t o
s upply a re
a nd t he
s ea t rue
r emains
o f
c entre
s hells
a re
p icture
o f
a s ite
c an
a s emi-permanent
unless
a ctivities
o ccasional
e vents
o n
t he
s ubjected b e
t he
p resence
a s ite .
a nd
t o
r ecovery
T he
c ultural
s harply
f actors
s ite
s uch
a nd
F or t he o ccupation o f a s emi-permanent p urely s ubsistence
b ased
d ifferent
f irst o r t he s econd a ssumption i s a dopted .
i magine
c onsidered
C onclusions
s erving a s a s
t ravelling
u norganized
s ite
t ends
I t
t rading
t o
a nd
i nitiatives .
b e
f ocused
o n
w ith l ess a ttention p aid t o a ctivities which
r equire a l ong t erm o rganization. I b elieve t hat t he e vidence f rom Agios P etros s trongly s uggests a pattern o f p ermanent o ccupation ; a nd i t may well b e t he c ase t hat Agios P etros i slands.
a bundance o f have
i s
the
F or
e xistence
i s
- 9 m ,
t hat o f
p oint
P etros
a t
P anagia
p ermanent
o f
t he
t he
s ite
e vidence
two
p lains,
t he
P articularly
u nder t he s ea n ear
f resh water
h as
n ot
b een
f low e ven i n m id-summer i ncreases
f or
f or
f ertile
o ccupation .
f resh water s prings
r einforces
t wo v alleys
i ts
l andscape f or g oats c ould d efinitely
t he s prings
the
which
s ettlement among t he A egean
with
A lthough t he q uantity o f
suitability
A gios
Kyra
a r easonable
t he
t he f act
i nteresting
o f
f resh water a nd i deal
s ettlement .
e stimated ,
t he only p ermanent
i sland
s ustained
i nteresting t he
i s n ot
T he
a major
t he
t he
settlement.
a rgument
c onsiderable
f or
t he
c hange
o f Kyra P anagia must
h ave
Another
p ermanency o f o f
s ea
l evel .
p rovided
much
m ore a rable l and t han i s e vident n owadays. A s
r egards
t he s uitability o f
t he i sland f or a s elf-sufficient
economy a c ase s tudy i s p ut f orward ( Appendix VI). f rom
t his
involved r emained
c ase and
s tudy, t he
which i s
c ontinuity
u nchanged
t hrough
o f
a nimals
f ood
s upply o n
( mainly g oats),
o f
many
A f ew y ears a go a number o f b asing t heir
i deal
i n
t erms
b asic y ears,
o f
S ome c onclusions
s ize o f
s ubsistence c ould
I t hink
f amilies were l iving o n
t he c ultivation o f o live f ishing
points emerge a s s ignificant:
a nd
small
t he c ommunity
e lements p rove t he
t rees,
which
i mportant . i sland
and
t he g razing
s cale g ardening .
C ertain
( a) t heir e xistence was d ependent o n
58
c ontacts w ith t he n earby i slands,
e specially f or t ransporting d airy
p roducts i n e xchange f or o ther f oodstuffs such a s maize and l entils. ( b) f ishing d id t he
n ot
e xperimental
p lay a n e ssential r ole i n t heir a ctivities.
i ntroduction
b ecause
h ad t o b e
i mported f rom o ther p laces. t he
was
a nimals
a bandoned
Thus
g rass
o f
c ommunity,
n ot
s uch a s
l ocally
t hough
s heep
a vailable
s ettled
i n
a nd
a nd
h uge
( c)
c attle
was
q uantities
a p ermanent
way
with
a dequate means o f s ubsistence a t hand, was i n c onstant c ontact with o ther
c ommunities
which
w ere
n o
more
t han
o ne
d ays
r eturn
t rip
away .
P ermanent o ccupation i n l ocations which might
l ook r emote d oes not
a lways
c ommunication .
p resuppose
c ultural
i solation
o r
l ack
o f
T here
i s c ertainly a d elicate balance b etween what t he environment c an p rovide a nd what t he p revailing t echnology c an o ffer. What h as b een o verlooked
i s
t he
s ense
o f
f amiliarity
h ad with t he e nvironment, must
have
b een
s ettlements e xploration
t he
f irst
which
l eads
a rea,
I t
s omething
which
must
h ave
t o
f or
p eople
moving
t o
e stablish
s uch
c ommunities
b eing
s et
u p ,
b ut
u nderlines o f
t he
r ather
s imilar t o p laces where
The p resence o f p alaeolithic f inds
i ndications
a lready
i s n ot a n u rge f or experimentation a nd
i s a s trong e vidence i n f avour o f
a lthough t he
s ettlers
b eing i n a f amiliar e nvironment,
o thers have succeeded. P etros
c ondition
i n t he a rea .
t he f eeling o f
t he
i ts c apacities a nd i ts l imitations, which
i n Agios
a c ontinuous o ccupation o f
n otion
a m esolithic
o f
f amiliarity .
s tage
t he
M oreover
i n A gios P etros a re n ot
s trong — a part f rom o ne t rapezoidal m icrolith o f o bsidian — i t might p ossible
t hat
r easons .
T he
i slands
mesolithic l ack ,
d espite
h owever,
t he
A t
t o
e xploit
s ituations,
a s
s uitable i f
t he
a dventure,
t o
r ate,
t heir
t erm
o f
c laims
s triking .
a nd
a ny
d eposits
were
l ost
mesolithic
f or
t he
c ommunities
t o
e vidence
c ontrary
a t
d ue
a ll
f rom
( Honea,
l evels
o f
b e
environmental o ther
1 975:
A egean 2 77)
d evelopment
i s
t end
e conomic a nd e nvironmental which t hey r ecognize
t echnological
-c olonization"
experimentation a nd
s kills;
e ven
i n
c ultural
t hey i ts
d o
n ot
weakest
i solation ,
i t
i nitiate
t hem
s ense
s uggests
s hould,
I t hink ,
b e a bandoned . I t i s t rue t hat t he e vidence f rom A gios P etros d oes n ot i ndicate c ultural i solation a t a ll : t he c hipped s tone i ndustry and t he r epertoire o f
t ools o f
s tone o r b one b etray c lose c ontacts with t he
t echnological d evelopments o f t he T hessalian I t may a lso well b e n ecessarily t he main h as
b een
s tressed,
t here
i s
n o e vidence f rom t he
would s upport such an i nterpretation . c ontext
t hat
f ishbones
s hortage
o f
a re
v ery
f ishbones
s ite s uch a s Myrtos i n C rete 5 .5.
( Appendix V II).
f ew
a t
s ite i tself
which
And i t i s s ignificant i n t his i n
a dmittedly t he a rea s ieved i n t his c ase was s imilar
mainland
t he c ase t hat f ishing s hould n ot b e c onsidered o ccupation o f t he i nhabitants a nd c ertainly, a s
A gios
P etros.
l imited,
A lthough
o ne c ould c ite
t he
a c omprehensively e xcavated c oastal
( Warren,
1 972).
C ultural A ffinities:
5 .5.1.
S ettlement:
Although t he a ctual a rchitectural r emains o f
t he s ite o f Agios
P etros a re s canty, v arious i ndications h elp u s t o r econstruct t he s hape and t he s ize o f t he s ettlement. All t he e vidence s uggests t hat t he f inds o n A gios P etros c ome f rom t he n orth—eastern p erimeter o f whose
l arger,
western
p art
i s
59
s ubmerged.
S ince
t he
t he s ite
s uccessful
completion
of
observations
the
underwater
a round
t he
i slet
survey
o f
and
Agios
t he
P etros
g eomorphological t ogether
with
t he
s oundings on l and, i t C an b e s uggested t hat t he n eolithic s ettlement c overed
a space
r elatively a ffected
t he
t he
e xtent
r eal
o f
3 0
a ccurate
x 5 0
d espite
s q. t he
d istribution o f o f
t he
m .;
t his
e rosion
t he
f inds
o ccupation
e stimation
a nd a nd
i s
c onsidered
t he wave a ction w hich h ave c onsequently o ur p icture
( Appendix
I ,
F ig .
o f
2 ).
I sland a nd c oastal s ettlements i n t he A egean d ating f rom t he e arly s tages
o f
t he
F rancthi C ave . r egard
t o
n eolithic
p eriod
A gios P etros
i ts
n atural
p osition
i nformation i t p rovides. which
h as
b een
d ocumented
f ound
b ecause
l evel ( Theochares,
v ery
f ew:
S kyros,
N .
Makri,
a nd
t he
amount
o f
w ith
a rchaeological
The only o ther e arly n eolithic i sland s ite
s o f ar ,
i t
a re
i s r epresentative o f s uch s ettlements
t oo
o n t he
h as
o nly
1 959B: 2 79).
i sland o f
S kyros,
p artially
i s n ot v ery w ell
s urvived
t he
r ise
o f
s ea
However, i t i s t hought t hat i t was a
small v illage s ettlement n ear t he c oast s et a t t he f oot o f h igher ground. The s ite o f N . Makri h as a s imilar s etting a lthough i ts s ize s eems
t o b e
c onsiderably l arge ( Theochares,
t he F rancthi o n t he s ea . should
n ot
1 956:
1 ) .
T he r emains
f rom
C ave s uggest t hat t he i nhabitants were h eavily d ependent I t i s t rue, however, t hat t he s etting o f t his l ast s ite b e
c onsidered
( Jacobsen, 1 973: 2 53) occupation until the
a s
t ypical
o f
t he
e arly n eolithic p eriod
s ince c aves were n ot u sed f or p ermanent late neolithic p eriod. In fact, r ecent
explorations i n t he v icinity o f t he F rancthi C ave suggest t hat t he a ctual n eolithic s ettlement was s ituated n ear t he c oast, p robably s ubmerged n ow, Andel,
1 980:
t he K itsos
a nd
t hat
t he c ave was a s easonal
3 57, Jacobsen,
1 981:
3 03).
The o nly
( Lambert,
s ettlement
1 981:
which r epresents
r egarding t he
a t
l east
o f
s ea
l evel
m isleading
f actors i nvolved
i n
s ome
( Bintliff,
( Flemming,
M editerranean 1 977)
1 973:
b ecause 1 ) .
r egarding
t he
and
s ettlement;
s etting
( Evans-Renfrew,
t he 1 968 :
o f
t he
T his
r egion o f
t he
within
a ttributed
9 8)
a nd
t ype o f
r easons,
t he
a f actor
s ettlement ( Renfrew,
a d ifferent t o
l ike
1 972).
t he e xact
h ave
b een
c omplexity f rom
o f
t he
S aliagos
i t
o nly
s tates
t hat
p robably
S aliagos
f ull
i s
t hat
t he
c ontext.
e xploitation
which
emerges a t
a l ittle
o f
more
s ea
Their
r esources
c learly
C halandriani
Manika i n E uboea) p osition has
i n
with
t he
a nd
t o
t he
e arly
f or a l ong
e xercised
o n
a much
b een
d efensive
a cropolisb ronze
I n a ddition a p opulation movement t owards t he
was
h ill
p romontory s ettlement o ccurs i n t he e arly
c ultural
Kastri
was
a ge s ea
t ime b een s uspected a nd
p artially substantiated i n many p arts o f Greece ( Sackett, s eafaring
r atio p roved
i f a r eduction i n s ea l evel o f 5o r 6m i s
d uring t he e arly h elladic p eriod h as Moreover
s ea
t he s ea l evel a nd c onsequently
b ronze p eriod ( Pyrgos i n P aros, A gia I rini i n K ea, b ut
t he
l and a nd t he s ea was q uite d ifferent f rom t oday
a t t he e nd o f a p romontory, t o b e a ccepted .
i s
t o A gios
b y t he c hange o f
T he r eport
t o r each c onclusions
s ize
r esemblances
G eneralizations a bout
t he
r eluctant
d istribution o f
t he
s ome g eneral c onclusions c an b e drawn
t heir n atural s etting .
r ise
o f
a p ure i sland c ulture
Although t hey h ave b oth b een a ffected
l evel s ince neolithic t imes,
p icture
6 9).
l ate n eolithic s ite o f S aliagos which b ears
o f
( Shackleton - V on
Cave i n A ttica o ffers o nly a f ragmentary
e arly o ccupation
P etros.
c amp
T he only o ther s imilar s ite,
l arger
s cale
1 966: 8 6).
a nd
p robably
p iracy had s tarted p l aying a n important r ole in A egean l ife f rom t he
60
e arly C ycladic p eriod o nwards H owever, d o n ot
i n n eolithic
t hink,
( Doumas,
t imes
a nd
t hat g eneralizations
1 973:
5 59).
p articularly c an b e made
i n
i ts
f irst
c oncerning
s tages,
t he s etting
a nd t ype o f s ettlement widely u sed mainly b ecause t he s ites f ound s o f ar
a re
f ew
t errains.
a nd
s pread
o ver
a wide
a rea a nd
i n
d ifferent
g eographical
An appropriate c omparative survey must b e l imited t o o ne
a rea where t he s patial d istribution o f e arly n eolithic s ites b ased o n n ature a nd l ocation c an b e o bserved b etter . B ecause o f t he l ack o f c onclusive e vidence, h owever, s uch a s a dequate e xcavated s ites, e ven i n a reas a s small a s T hessaly i t would b e wrong t o a pproach t he p roblem o f t he n ature b e
o f
s ettlements
i n a s tatistical way .
t reated s eparately o r we h ave
d aLa ( environmental,
t o a ccept
E ither e ach s ite must
t hat
t here
a re
n o
a vailable
g eological) which c an b e extrapolated t o a llow
e asy conclusions i n t he e arly neolithic p eriod ( Halstead, 1 981: 1 94). Thus i t i s n ot justifiable t o a ssume t hat t here existed i n t he early n eolithic
a unified
l ocation
which
pattern
c ould
have
o f
s ettlements
p revailed
o ver
i n
t erms
t he
o f
s ize
d iversity
o f
a nd
l ocal
c onditions, the a vailability o f r esources and t he b est method e xploiting t he e nvironment e conomically ( Halstead, 1 977: 2 3).
o f
The p ossibility t hat t he Aegean i slands were o ccupied i n t he n eolithic p eriod b y e ither a n on-permanent p opulation o r b y p eople who experienced s upported o f
t he
w ith
l ong
p eriods
o f
i solation
( Cherry,
b y t he e vidence f rom A gios P etros .
s ite
a nd
maritime
i ts
c arefully
a ctivities .
c hosen
T his
a daptation which h as b een u sed
l ocation
c onfirms
1 981:
4 4)
i s
not
T he g eographical p osition
t he
p resupposes n otion
o f
f amiliarity
e nvironmental
t o e xplain t he p resence o f n eolithic man
i n the i slands ( Cherry, 1 981: 6 0). The e vidence a vailable s uggests a more c omplex c ause f or t he p rehistoric o ccupation o f i slands s uch a s A gios P etros. t he r esult o f o f
s ea
worthy
( Bintliff,
t hat
T he e stablishment o f t he s ettlement c an b e s een more a s c ertain t echnological a dvances, s uch a s t he c onstruction b oats,
t han o f
t he p ursuance
o f
s ubsistence
o ptions
1 977).
I t i s p robably within a f ramework o f n ew c onditions i n t he A egean t he e xistence o f i sland s ites must b e c onsidered . T his would b e
t rue n ot o nly f or g eneral p ractices s uch a s s tock-breeding b ut a lso f or r esponses t o s pecifically A egean d evelopments l ike e xtensive t rade a nd s ea
c ommunication .
n ew
c onditions
G reek
mainland
c oast.
I t
T he
i n
t he
b ut
also
a lso
b y
suggests
c reating a n eolithic c ombination
e vidence
o f
f rom A gios P etros s uggests
A egean may n ot
h ave
b een
d evelopments
t hat
t he
o n
A egean
i nfluenced t he
t hat
o nly
t hese b y
t he
o pposite Anatolian
i slands
were
c apable
c ulture with i ts own d istinctive c haracter,
e lements
d rawn
f rom
t he
two
s ides
o f
t he
o f a
Greek
a rchipelago. 5 .5.2.
T he P ottery:
The
p ottery
i nteresting.
a ssemblage
C ertain
s hapes
o f
t he
Agios
P etros
and d ecorative
material
motifs
a re
i s
v ery
s trikingly
d ifferent f rom what i s c ommon a t t his t ime i n n eighbouring Thessaly a nd mainland
Greece.
characteristic d esigns
a re
o n a c reamy
The t he
two
important
c arinated
s lipped
b owls
b ackground .
6 1
features a nd
t he
T aking
which
p ainted
i nto
are
very
d ecorative
a ccount
t he
e arly
d ate
o f
i ts
a ppearance
o ccurrence o f
t he
- l ate
f ormer
a nywhere i n G reece .
e arly
n eolithic
t he
r epertoire
i n
T he s hape
- t his o f
may
T hessaly ( Tsangli) ( Wace-Thompson , phiale
( 1908:
which
1 83).
T sountas
t he
f irst
p ottery
i s q uite d ifferent f rom t he t ypical w ide
d ish with a f lat b ottom a nd v ertical s ides o f A 3b ware o f d eep
b e
n eolithic
1 912 :
c ites
a s
9 3,
t he
F ig .
s outh-eastern
4 5) a nd a lso f rom
b asic
A 3b
s hape
o f
t he
S esklo
T he c arinated b owl, o r phiale a s i t i s s ometimes c alled
( Theochares, 1 970: 2 76, F ig. 5 ) i s n ot f ound until t he l ate n eolithic e ither i n Thessaly ( Dimini 1 - Milojcic, 1 959A: 4 3, F ig. 1 3) o r i n Macedonia ( Heurtley, 1 939: 1 48, N o. 8 4; p rofiles o f c arinated b owls r eported
f rom
T his
t he
F rancthi
c arinated
c haracteristic
i n
f orm
material
i s,
( Vitelli,
h owever ,
C atal H üyük
W est
Anatolia
( Mellaart,
( Hacilar
1 971:
I - C atal
1 19),
v ery
1 974:
c ommon
1 63,
F ig .
Two
8 7a,b).
i n Anatolia,
a nd H acilar V I-I .
c hronological r elationship d oes e xist o f
R odden, 1 964, P late 5A).
s imilar t o t hose f rom Agios P etros a re
a lmost
A lthough a b road
b etween t he e arly c halcolithic I I
H üyük
West)
t he i ndications o f
and
t he
S esklo
c ulture
s uch a p arallelism h ave n ever
b een s o a pparent and d irect a s i n t he material f rom t he s ite o f Agios P etros. T he b road
d ecoration
p arallel
a nd
h ere
a ppears
h orizontal
t o
b e
l ines
o f b ands - or wavy l ines ( Fig. 4 7); p rominent . e arly
I t
i s a r esult
c halcolithic
I I
more
o f
d isciplined
g iving
t he
w ith
i mpression
t he p resence o f t he r ed p aint i s
which r ecalls
ware
s trictly
- s ometimes
C atal
A natolian
H üyük
W est
p ottery s uch a s
( Mellaart,
1 965:
t he 1 52).
I t i s moreover s ignificant t hat t here a re a lso p ainted s herds whose patterns
a re
( Mellaart, What
s imilar
1 961: t he
1 77,
t o
t he
F ig.
meander
i nsistance o n p ure
i ndicative o f,
p ottery
s tyle
f rom
Hacilar
I
1 2). l inear p atterns
i t i s not easy t o s ay .
i n A gios P etros may b e
I t i s c ertain t hat
t hese well
d efined d ecorative motifs, which a re s trictly g eometrical, g iving a l ight-on-dark e ffect
( A3a),
d o
n ot
o ccur
f requently
i n
T hessaly .
T hey
a re r are a t S esklo ( Tsountas, 1 908: 1 87, F ig. 9 7) b ut more c ommon a t T sangli which has a t radition o f l inear d ecoration ( Wace-Thompson, 1 912 : 1 07, F ig . 5 7). What i s c ertain i s t he s outh-westerly o rientation o f t he A gios P etros c ulture, a f actor which i s e vident v ery e arly f rom t he
d eeper
l inear
T hessalian 3 5,
l evels
d esigns,
note
ware,
1 ).
d i ferent
s imilar
T his
f rom
with t he
p arallel
t he
c haracteristic l inear d ecoration - s imple
l ines, t o
c hevron
C haeronea
s trong l inear
a nd
n et
t radition o f
western T hessalian
p atterns
a nd O rchomenos l inear
- o f
( Kunze
t he
I I,
c entral Greece,
d ecoration a s
A 3b
1 931: quite
i t h as
b een
exemplified i n t he s ite o f T sani, a ppears t o a c ertain extent t o have a ffected
t he s outhern s ite o f
s imilarities.
Z erelia t o
w hich A gios P etros b ears c lose
Whether o r not t he Agios P etros p ainted p ottery i s an
o ffshoot o f t his s outhern c ultural t radition i s n ot easy t o s ay.
I t
must b e p ointed o ut t hat t he r ed-on-white a nd r ed-on-buff wares a re v ery c ommon t hroughout G reece f rom Macedonia t o t he P eloponnese ( Nemea, G onia) d uring t he 5 th millennium o r e ven e arlier f or t he r ed-on-white p ainted ware f rom C haeronea
a s W einberg ( 1962: 1 58) .
s uggests S ome o f
t he d esigns f rom s ites s uch a s Gonia with s imple c hevrons a nd l inear motifs
a re
v ery
s imilar
t o
t hat
o f
1 3).
62
A gios
P etros
( Biegen ,
1 930,
F ig .
3 ,
However, c haracter
o f
the p ainted p ottery o f A gios Petros h as a d istinctive i ts
own .
Though
i t
r esembles
t he
l inear
decorative
t radition o f c entral G reece, i t a lso b ears c lose s imilarities t o t he t ypical
S esklo
s tyle .
T he
S esklo
f eatures
a ppear
i n
t he
d eeper
l evels
with r ather " archaic" c haracteristics r eminiscent o f e arly p ainted p ieces: s imple l inear d esigns o n c reamy s lip and u sually a g lossy b lack
i nterior
( Fig .
T hessalian s ites
2 :
3 ,4)
( Theochares,
f eatures
1 959A :
4 1,
which
F ig .
9 ,
a re
f ound
1 5) .
T he
a t
o ther
e xecution
o f
t he p ainted p atterns b ecomes more a dvanced l ater o n b ut t he p redominant d esign r emains t he l inear motif with t he c haracteristic b road H owever t he t ypical S esklo d ecoration which o riginated i n t he w est
o r
s outh
c ontinued Agios
u nder
t he
i nfluence
with a g reat
P etros
v ariety
o f
T sani
- C haeronea
l ines. s outh-
t raditions
o f l inear a nd s olid d esigns,
quite a d ifferent
appearance;
i ndeed
t he
a nd
h as a t
d ecorative
motits c ould b e r elated m ore t o t he material f rom C haeronea ( French , 1 972, S oteriades, 1 968) a nd L ianokladi ( Wace-Thompson, 1 912: 1 71) a nd l ess
t o
t he e astern T hessalian s tyle.
The r elation b etween t he G reek a nd A natolian p ainted t raditions i s c lear.
n ot
The r ed-on-white p ainted
t radition i n A sia M inor c haracterizes t he
n eolithic and c halcolithic c ultures o f t he Anatolian p lateau with a l imited t he
d istribution
end
o f
t he
o f
e arly
p ainted
wares
c halcolithic
t owards p eriod
t he
t he
w estern r egion . r ed-on-white
B y
wares
d isappear c ompletely and t he whole r egion i s d ominated b y t he l ate c halcolithic burnished wares.
T he absence o f p ainted s herds
a long
w estern A natolia a nd t he e astern A egean i slands ( Furness, 1 956: 1 73) i s not c ompletely d ue t o t he l ack o f s ystematic exploration ; s urveyed a reas
i n
a lmost 9 9). n ot
n orth-western
n o I t
t races i s
o f
i ndeed
a nd
w estern
p ainted
A natolia, a dmittedly
p ottery ( Mellaart,
p ossible
t hat
t he
1 955:
manufacture
o f
f ew,
8 0,
p ainted
r each t he c oastal a reas o f western A natolia a t a ll
r evealed
F rench ,
1 961:
wares
( Mellaart,
d id
1 970)
( see F ig. 8 0) except f or a f ew sherds f rom t he l ower Maeander valley ( see s ection 6 ). The i ndependent nature o f
t he Greek p ainted t radition has b een
f orcefully argued ( Theochares, 1 973) a nd d iscussed ( Chourmouziades, 1 971B: 1 65). T he e vidence f rom Agios P etros h owever, p rovided s ome i nteresting h ints r egarding G reek p ainted t raditions. " Early t opped
p ainted"
p ieces,
although
a
t he
r est
o f
r elationship
b etween
s herds a ppear i n A gios P etros
b oth
i ndications
Proto-Sesklo
s tratigraphically . a t
t he
C ertainly
o f
s o
phase
t he
c alled
cannot
p eriod
i s
t he A natolian a nd
t ogether w ith b lackP roto-Sesklo be
p eriod
distinguis hed
r epresented
n ot
a s
well
a s
t he k nown Thessalian s ites s uch a s O tzaki ( Milojcic,
1 954:
1 ), A rgissa, S ouphli, Gentiki a nd N essonis
7 5).
I n c ontrast a t S esklo t he d epth o f t he l evel which c arries t he
" early
painted"
( Theocares,
1 962:
p ieces 6 3).
I n
n umber o f p ainted s herds 7 1),
G imbutas,
s eparate
phase
p ainted"
sherds
1 971: c an
i s
relatively
o ther
s ites
2 77)
only
b e
b elong
t o
and
t hus
63
c losed
P yrasos
and
p re ence I n Agios phiale
1 959A:
reaches
1 m
a nd A chilleion
( Theochares,
t he
s uspected. t he
greater
l ike
i s v ery l imited
( Theochares,
1 959A : o f
t he
1 962:
a s upposedly
P etros s hape
2 9,
t he
while
" early t heir
d ecoration 3 ).
c onsists
o f
r ed p atterns o n a l ighter
The d ecorative motif i s
b and,
3 -4
cm t hick ,
t riangles .
c oncentrated
b ackground ( Fig .
u nder
with c areless e xecution o r i n
T he main b ody o f
t he v ase
s ometimes
t he
r im
a s
t he f orm o f
1 :
1 -
a b road i nverted
b ears u nfilled c ircles .
T his p rimitiveness o f d ecoration i s t ypical o f t he f irst p ainted p ieces a nd d istinguishes t hem f rom t he " classical" p ainted p ottery o f middle n eolithic
( Theochares,
1 967).
Although t he number o f well
r epresented
b y
with
a t hick white
t he
b lack-topped p ieces i s l imited t hey a re
o pen
s lip .
b owl
u sually
A ccording
with
t o M ilojcic
l ow
b ase
( 1955:
r ing
1 77)
c overed
t he
b lack-
t opped s herds w ith whitish s lip must b e c onsidered t o b e a v ariation o f the white ware, which o ccurs a t S esklo a t t he end o f t he monochrome phase;
b oth
( Zervos I ,
wares
1 962:
employ
1 51).
e laborate d ecoration , n eolithic h ere,
a s
pieces
s ites h as
can
1 967:
b een suggested thought
s hapes
and
1 971B:
1 74)
There
a lso
c lose
t riangles a s
1 44).
f or
t o
( Chourmouziades a re
same
s uch a s h anging
( Theochares,
be
e xamples o f
the
t he
same
b ase
r ing
The p ieces f rom A gios P etros do n ot b ear a ny M oreover
s ome
s ites,
p recede
t he
s imilarities
t he c ase a t o ther
t here
t hat
i s n o e vidence
t he
" early
f or t echnological
S itagroi a nd Agios P etros
i s
b lack-topped
painted"
sherds
r easons.
b etween
( Renfrew,
t he
1 970 :
b lack-topped
2 96) a lthough t he
r elationship b etween t he s outhern B alkan a nd G reek d ark wares i s n ot very c lear ( Chapman, 1 981); t here s eems t o b e a r ough chronological e quation b etween S itagroi I a nd I n A natolia ,
t he m ain p hase o f A gios P etros.
b lack-topped p ottery has
a nd e xtensively d escribed b y G arstang H owever ,
a f ragment
o f
a n
b een
r eported
f rom
Mersin
( 1953).
o pen
b owl
w ith s lightly
c arinated
f orm
( Fig. 1 :5), a d ark b lack b and on t he r im a nd v ertical z ig-zag l ines o f b rown-red p aint o n white s lip a s d ecoration may t ell u s
s omething a bout
the r elationship
f or t he b lack-
t opped e ffect
i s
b etween t he
two d ifferent s tyles;
i ntentional a nd t he
l inear p ainted p attern r ecalls
" early p ainted" painted p ieces o f S esklo ( Theochares, 7 8:2).
T he
s hape
o f
t he
d eep
b owl,
a lmost
l ike
1 967:
t he
1 35, F ig.
a b asin,
h as
many
s imilarities w ith t he e xample c ited b y T sountas ( 1908: 1 78, F ig . 7 :1) . S o i t i s l ikely t hat p otters involved i n t he manufacture o f p ainted p ottery
w ere
a lso
making
b lack-topped
have any c ultural s ignificance . p ainted" s herds were d own
t o
m iddle
p ieces;
t he
l atter
c an
h ardly
A t Agia A nna i n Thessaly, t he " early
f ound a ll o ver t he e arly d eposit a nd c ontinued
n eolithic :
P roto-Sesklo
p ieces
a ppeared
t ogether
with
B untpolierte B arbotine a nd C ardium s herds . A t Magoulitsa a nd P yrasos p ainted wares a nd monochrome p ottery o ccur t ogether a nd p robably we a re dealing
with
only
one
cultural
period
( Prodromos-Ag.
Anna-N.
N ikomedeia). I ndeed,
within t he wide f ramework o f t he early n eolithic a s a n
e conomic a nd t echnological s tage o f a b roader e volutionary p rocess, t he d istinction o f e ach o f t he p eriods p roposed b y M ilojcic a nd T heochares a nd
b ased o n t he p resence o f s pecific wares i s n ot
s atisfactory ;
i t i s
t oo h eavy a b urden f or t he ware t o c arry . I t i F o bvious, I t hink, t hat t his misleading u se o f t he ware, e ven a s p art o f a c ombination o f v arious
material c haracteristics,
s tarts
64
f rom t he moment
i t
i s u sed a s
a s trict c hronological e lement a t radition . A v ery f ound
i n
f ew
p ieces
a ssociation
1 :2,3).
The
r ow
t ypical A 3 s tyle b ecause o f
t he
which c an
w ith
o f
f or s ubdividing o ne p eriod o r l ocalizing
t he
f illed
o f T sani
b e
r est
c haracterized
o f
t he
t riangles
" early
i s
q uite
i s d ifficult
s olid
s tyle
w ere
p ieces
( Fig .
d ifferent
Magoula ( Wace-Thompson ,
s tratigraphy i t
a s
p ainted" 1 912,
t o s ay i f
F ig .
f rom
t he
8 6a,b)
a nd
t he f irst p ainted
A 3 a ppears j ust a fter t he monochrome l evels a s i s t he c ase a t T sani, T sangli
( Milojcic,
1 955)
S ouphli,
G endiki a nd o ther Thessalian s ites.
T he e arly monochrome p ottery i s n ot e asy t o r elate d irectly t o t he F rühkeramikum wares a s T hessalian e arliest
s ites,
f or
monochrome
d ate .
H owever ,
i n S q.
I ( level 9 ,
t hey h ave b een d efined b y Milojcic a t o ther
e xample
t o
c eramics
t he
o f
O tzaki
A gios
s ome h andles o r l ugs
material
P etros
a re
( 1959A ,
p robably
7 ) ;
o f
t he
a l ater
f ound i n t he d eeper l evels,
mainly
1 0) b ear s ome t ypical Thessalian e arly n eolithic I
c haracteristics such a s t he f orm o f t he p erforated h andles ( Fig. 3 1). T he s ame f eatures o ccur a t S kyros ( Theochares, N . Makri ( 1956: an
early
1 16);
1 959B :
n eolithic
d ate.
N evertheless
t he
c riteria t o e stablish t he e xistence o f a p hase b ecause s imple
s uch
c riteria c an p rove
s olution
suspension
o f
c omparative
o f
a t echnical
a p ot. s olely
t ubular
were
( Mellaart, 1 958: d irect was
Even
s tudies
g eographically l ugs,
F ig .
3 6) a nd
more
n amely
d ifficult
c ultural
i n
T he
t he n eolithic
t he
i s
a reas
s uch e lements .
f ound
o f
s uch
s ometimes
i solated misleading
t o r epresent n othing more
p roblem,
b etween o n
u se i s
s ecure
t he
a ttempt
which
s ame
a re
t ype
l evels
t han t he
h olding
o f
o f
t o
f ar
o r
b ase a part
h andles,
Hacilar
t he
I X-VI
1 27), a f act which Mellaart c onsidered a s a s ign o f
r elations
e xpressed
3 18,
b oth s ites a re r eported a s b elonging f irmly t o
b etween
b y
F rench
t he
two
who
a reas
i ndicated
( 1965: t hat
1 16) .
T he
o pposite
v iew
s uch f eatures a re a bsent
i n
t he c oastal a rea o f A sia Minor and t herefore a westward movement o f A natolian c haracteristics
i s h ypothetical
A s h as a lready b een mentioned, o f
A gios
P etros
i s
m iddle
n eolithic .
i n
c eramic
t he
b eginning
o f
c ompletely C arination
p roducts
t he
l ate
a s
o f
t he
u nknown
e legant i n
p eriod
1 5). c arinated
mainland G reece
a f eature
t he end o f
n eolithic
( 1965:
a ppears
f or
b owl
t ypical
i n e arly
t he
f irst
a nd t ime
t he middle n eolithic and t he
i n
T hessaly
a nd
c entral
G reece.
The r esult, h owever, i s q uite d ifferent f rom t he Agios P etros s hape. The c arination i s u sually p ositioned h igh i n t he b ody o f t he vase marking
t he b eginning o f
Milojcic, l ower a t
1 969, t he
a ccompanied b elong
t o
b y t he
t he v ertical a nd s lightly e verted r im ( Arapi -
P late 1 6:1,
b eginning o f a h igh l ate
1 1:6). t he
h andle
( 1969,
n eolithic
I n o ther examples i t i s
r ound
o r f lat b ase and i s
P late
r epertoire
1 7:3,4,5) .
A ll
o f
t hey a re
wares,
c lassified a s g rey-black p ottery a nd r ecall t he and Thompson ( 1912: a bove c ases,
1 7).
s ituated
f requently
I t i s n oticeable,
t hese
s hapes mainly
rla c ategories o f
h owever,
t he c arinated b owl was n ever f ound b earing
Wace
t hat i n a ll t he t he t ypical r ed
on white middle n eolithic d ecoration a s i s t he c ase o f Agios P etros. P erhaps t he c losest p arallel t o t hat c alled
g rey-black
b urnished
wares
i s
t he s hape
d escribed
i n
t ypical o f
d etail
t he s o
b y Kunze
a t
O rchomenos ( 1931: 9 , F ig. 4 ) and f ound a t many o ther s ites i n c entral and s outhern Greece s uch a s N . Makri ( Theochares, ( Weinberg,
1 937:
5 11).
I t
1 956:
1 8),
i s a d eep b owl with high s ides
65
C orinth
which a re
s eparated f rom
t he l ower
r ound
i t
b ottom ;
i s
b ody b y a s harp c arination a nd p robably with a
b est
r epresented
i n
" Bothros
p hase"
a nd
i n T rench
3 o f E latea ( Weinberg,'1962: 1 86, F ig. 1 0 :11). A l ate m iddle n eolithic d ate f or t he " Bothros phase" i n t he c entral G reek s equence has b een s uggested
b y F rench ( 1972).
Moreover t he l ate c halcolithic c arinated b owl with c oncave r im f rom Anatolia which i s
t ypical o f p eriod 4 o f
d ifferent i n f orm ( Lloyd-Mellaart, T hus
t he p resence o f t he
motifs must
1 962:
c arinated
9 6,
B eycesultan
F ig.
b owl
i s
quite
P .10:1-6).
d ecorated
w ith
t he
l inear
b e c onsidered u nusual i n t he Greek mainland during t he
m iddle n eolithic. A s
far
a s
t he
r est
o f
r epertoire a re c oncerned, G reece . f lat o r
p ottery
( Holmberg, o r
a ceramic
1 964).
b asketry
I t
i s
c ertainly
p rototypes
c ultures.
T he
many
T hessalian
s ites
w ith
d ifficulty
i n
g radual
a nd
i ts
l imited
( Theochares,
A gios P etros.
i n n umber , which
p rocess
o f
i n
i n
t he
Agios
P etros over
which e volved
may
t he
go
s hape
b ack
c an
t reatment o f c ommon
t he
s een
i n
a n e volution
which i s
t raced
n oticeable,
h owever ,
i s
i s
t he
T he f ine P roto-Sesklo p ieces, t he e xamples
a ppearance t raced
i n
c eramics,
and
t he
o f
m iddle n eolithic
must
u se
a m eans
t he c lay s urface
s hape
f rom
t o
b e
b e
s een
i n t he manufacture o f p ottery i n g eneral.
middle n eolithic
A nother
b y
a s hape o f
1 967), What
s ucceeded
rougher
d eterioration may b e
t he
i mcomplete
w ere
were
d eterioration s lip
o f
o rigin
e volution
c hange i n t he quality o f t he f abric . b owls
f orms
T he d eep b owl w ith s traight o r s lightly e verted s ides a nd w ith b ase r ing b ottom i s v ery p opular f rom t he early neolithic
o nwards wooden
t he
t hey a re c ommon i n Thessaly and a ll
o f
t he
p erhaps
a s
a
A s imilar
t hick
o f
c reamy
c overing
a n
i tself.
i n A gios P etros
i s
t he
r ound
b odied j ar with
h igh neck and h igh b ase ( Fig. 9a) which o ccurs t hroughout t he middle neolithic
p eriod
1 973 :
P late I II,
2 81,
v ariations 1 75,
1 957:
1 42).
1 6,
F ig .
i n s ites
1 2) .
i n t he h eight o f
i n many s ites o f 1 912:
i n Thessaly
I ts
s uch a s T sangli ( Theochares,
b asic f orm i s
t he s ame
t he n eck a nd t he s hape o f
c entral Greece such a s L ianokladi
1 19),
C haeronea
( Soteriades,
1 912 :
b ut r egional
t he b ody d o o ccur ( Wace-Thompson,
2 53),
L erna
( Caskey,
The variations o f t his s hape i n t he e arly n eolithic c ultures o f s outh east
Europe a re
Karanovo t he b ase,
q uite d istinctive .
I n
t he
Bulgarian s ite
r ound b odied jar a ppears with a h igh,
a lmost p edestal,
c onical i n s hape and with a h igh c ollar ( Georgiev,
1 961:
s imilar a re
t he s hapes f rom o ther B alkan s ites ( Tringham,
F ig .
f rom
1 2)
1 981,
a nd
Z ervos, I n
t he
1 962:
Anatolia
c ontemporary t o
A egean
3 62,
and t he
s ite
o f
P aradimi
t ypical
Greek
s hape
4 5); 8 0,
( Bakalakis-Sakellariou ,
e specially
i n
S esklo p eriod,
Hacilar
( Mellaart,
I ,
t he r ound
1 970:
which
h owever,
1 38,
s hapes a nd a f lat
b ase.
66
i s
c onsidered
b odied jars with
F ig.
h igh
d ifferent f rom t he 1 14:
t he Hacilar f orm h as a v ery h igh v ertical c ollar,
a v ariety o f
1 971:
P late 5 10).
c ollar o r f unnel n eck a re f requent b ut, i ndeed
o f
2 ,
9 ,
3 1,
3 4);
a d eep b ody o f
The
f lat and r ing vase b ases o f A gios P etros a re t ypical o f t he
e arly a nd
m iddle G reek n eolithic .
T he
e volution
o f
t he
l ow
r ing
b ase
i n t he early p eriod o f t he Thessalian n eolithic a s a n a lternative t o t he s uspension o f t he v ases h as l ong b een a ttested ( Theochares, 1 967: 1 06) a nd e xamples o f f lat b ases with a n i mpressed h ollow which c reates a p rimitive N essonis
r ing
I a nd
a re
r eported
A chilleion
f rom
( 1967 :
t he
1 07,
early
F ig .
5 8).
n eolithic M oreover
s ites
t he
l ow
o f
r ing
b ase i s particularly c ommon i n t he t ypical S esklo b owl o r skyphos o f t he e arly p hases w ith t he i nverted r ims. R ing r elations t he
b ases h ave o ften b een u sed a s e vidence o f i ndirect c ultural w ith t he A natolian c oast a nd K onya p lain ( French , 1 965: 1 5);
i ndications
p roper
d ifficult r ing
f rom A sia Minor ,
a rchaeological t o
b ases
p roceed are
t o
n ot
h owever,
s urveys
a re
c omparative
a t
a ll
a re n ot
c arried
c ommon
i n
R ing
r ing
t hat
t he
a nd
a nd
u ntil
a rea,
G enerally
Anatolia
t hey
i t
i s
s peaking
a re
r ather
b ases a re c ommon i n t he
b lack-on-red l ate n eolithic w are o f D ikili T as I t i s i ndeed n oticeable
i n
o bservations.
c onsidered a s a western ( Balkan) f eature .
w ithout
c onclusive
o ut
( Deshayes,
1 972:
2 03).
t he c arinated b owl o f A gios P etros
i s
b ase a nd s imilar t o i ts A natolian c ounterparts.
T here i s a variety o f h andles which b etray s imilarities mainly w ith t he Thessalian mainland .
L edge l ugs,
w ere f ound i n many e arly n eolithic s ites and Argissa and O ther
t ypes
i t s eems
o f
h andles
t o b e
s uch
which a re a lways p erforated,
i n T hessaly s uch a s A chilleion
t he s implest
a s
t ubular
and
way o f making a h andle. s tring
holes
r elatively b ig v ases a nd t hey a re s imple i n f orm. which c an b e a ssociated w ith t he e astern A egean r egion s uch a s
b elong
t o
F orms o f handles
i slands
a nd
t he
B alkan
t he p illar a nd h orn h andles a re c ompletely a bsent a t
A gios P etros. The
two
main
c ategories
o f
d ecoration
r epresenting
n eolithic p eriod a re ( a) l inear i ncisions ( Fig. c ombination o f a s
t he
f irst
i ncised
a nd p ointille
c ategory
d ealing
w ith
p hase) .
T he d ecoration o f
o n a p hiale s imilar t he
o f
material
o f
material
s ome o f
c lay,
f rom
t echnique
c oncerned
i ncised
b rown
s herds
p ointille a nd
e arly
i s
N .
i s
a lso
A gios
1 0,
1 2) and
t echniques ( Fig .
2 5 :
1 -9).
i t
i s
v ery
P etros
n ot
( Tsangli
c lear
p hase)
t hese p ieces
t hin s lip a nd Makri
t he
2 5:
A s
whether
o r
l ate
f ar
we
are
( Rakhmani
with r homboid i ncisions
b urnished a ppearance,
( Theochares,
1 956,
i nteresting .
I t
s eems
many
t o
l ate ( b) a
h ave
P late
i s
r are
r ecalls
4 ).
i n
The
T hessaly
s imilarities
with
t he i ncised p ottery o f t he C ave o f P an a t Marathon ( Soteriades, 1 958: 1 5);
i ndeed s ome p ieces show s trong r esemblances ( Zervos I I,
5 00,
F ig.
8 38).
S oteriades
s uggests
t hat
the
material
o f
b elongs t o t he middle n eolithic phase o f c entral G reece, C haeronea a nd Orchomenos, p hase
t o
l ate
n eolithic
1 962:
t he
s ite
s imilar t o
which i n f act r epresents t he t ransitional
( Dimini)
i n
t he
T hessalian
s equence
( 1958:
1 9).
This p robably means t hat t he i ncised p ottery o f Agios P etros must b e c onsidered
c loser
s piral motifs
t o
t he T sangli phase
t han t o Rakhmani,
where
t he
a re p redominant .
The p ointi ng t echnique, h owever, i s n ot c ommon i n Thessaly. f ew
p ieces
D imini
o ccur
( Tsountas,
a t
T sangli
1 908:
2 02,
( Wace-Thompson, F ig .
1 13-115)
6 7
1 912,
a nd
i t
F ig . i s
5 6),
e ven
S esklo
more
r are
A a nd i n
Macedonia ( Servia - H eurtley, t here
a re
V ld),
s igns
A ttica
R enfrew,
o f
t his
( Theochares,
1 968 :
4 3,
1 939:
t echnique
F ig .
a t
1 956:
X XVa ,b) .
1 46, N o. 6 2). O rchomenos
2 3,
F ig.
H owever,
I n s outhern Greece
( Kunze
4 2)
a nd
I I,
1 931,
S aliagos
t he p ointille
P late
( Evans-
t echnique
must
b e c onsidered a s c haracteristic o f t he i slands o f t he e astern A egean ( Hood, 1 981, F urness, 1 956, P late X X 2 3). A lthough i t i s d ifficult t o u se t his t echnique a s a c riterion f or d irect c ultural c onnections b etween d ifferent g eographical r egions w e s hould n ot o verlook t he f act t hat
a t
p oints
Agios
P etros,
t he
p ointille
l ate
n eolithic
f eature
i s
a nother
s ign
T ogether
with
t he
s herds
a s mall
n umber
w ith e arly b ronze a ge c haracteristics h ave b een f ound ( Fig . i s
n ot
a t
a ll
n eolithic b ear
e asy
t o
m aterial .
i ncised
l ines
which
t owards A natolia.
a re
d istinguish t hem
T he
b owls
d ecoration
v ery
i n
i nteresting .
f orm
T his
o f
s tyle
l ip
p ieces 2 ) .
s tratigraphically f rom
w ith a t hick r ounded
t he
o f
1 1:
I t
t he
which
l ate
u sually
c rude X 's a nd c rosshatching o f
d ecoration
i s
p articularly
e vident i n A natolia a nd t he i slands o f t he e astern A egean, a s t he f inds f rom P oliochni a nd Kum T epe s how ( Sperling, 1 976, F ig. 1 4). T he c orrespondence o f t he d ifferent p hases o f many o f t he n orth-western Anatolian s ites i s s till u nder d iscussion ( Hood, 1 981). H owever, i t s eems t o
t hat
t he
s ub-periods
1 A ,
t he l ate c halcolithic 2 ,
1 B,
1 C a t K um T epe a re r oughly
3 a nd 4 a t B eycesultan while
t he F irst S ettlement a t P oliochni
b ears
p arallel
t he p ottery o f
s ome s imilarities w ith t he K um
T epe m aterial. 5 .5.3.
F igurines:
T he f igurine material o f A gios P etros i s v ery important f or t he c ultural are
a ffinities
t ypologically
manufacture
w ith
i t
b etrays
c lose
t he
t o
f at
w ith t he
f emale
a nimal a nd a crolith e xamples . whose
s pecific
o ther
r egions .
T hessalian
n aturalistic,
H owever,
characteristics,
Most
o f
t radition
o f
c ross-shaped
t he
f inds
f igurine s chematic,
t here a re a n umber o f f igurines
executional
d etails
and
g eneral
a ppearance d iffer n ot o nly f rom what i s c onsidered a t ypical T hessalian b ut a lso f rom a ll t he m aterial which i s r egarded a s r epresentative o f t he
Greek
r epertoire.
figurines
which
These
b elong
t o
a re our
t he
p owerful
second
h eads
category
and
o f
t he
owe
c lay their
d istinctiveness t o t he u se o f n ew r epresentational t echniques which u ndoubtedly c reate a n ew impression ; whether t he r esult i s a matter o f s tyle o r b etrays s omething f urther which c an b e r elated t o o ther a spects
o f
t he
l ife
o f
t he
s ettlement,
will
b e
t he
s ubject
o f
d iscussion. W e a nd
h ave,
t he
e lsewhere,
c onstructional
d ealt w ith t he d escription o f methods
u sed
i n
t heir
t hese f igurines
manufacture.
Our
c onclusion r egarding t he f orm o f t he upper p art o f t he h ead i nclines more t o t he i nterpretation t hat we have h ere t he r epresentation o f a hairstyle
r ather
t han a h at
( Fig.
2 5).
While
t he motif o f c oiffure
o ccurs among T hessalian e xamples - a dmittedly i n a l imited n umber a s t he f igurine f rom Achilleion s hows ( Chourmouziades, 1 974, P late 9 7 b ottom) - c ertain e xecutional d etails v ery c ommon i n A gios P etros p oint t o
t he
A natolian
A egean i slands material o f
t radition
( Hood,
a s
1 981:
e xemplified
6 3,
F ig. 4 3,
b y
t he
f inds
t ypical s ites s uch a s Hacilar ( Mellaart
68
o f
t he
N o. 3 10 a nd No. 3 09) 1 970,
e astern a nd
I I:
t he
2 23).
T he
most
o bvious
f eature
i s
t he
i ncised
z ig-zag
l ines
o n b oth
which mark t he s eparation b etween t he h air-style a nd
t he f ace .
a t eature
which
i s
f igurine
b ut
i s
t he
which
V I-I
while
o n
o ther
t he a rea o f
S imilarities well
c ompletely
u nknown
h and
v ery
t he B alkans
a lthough
i t
i s
t he G reek i n
t he
material
h as n othing s imilar
b etween t he A gios
e stablished
i n
c ommon
P etros
c lear
g roup
t hat
a nd
many
t emples T his i s
t radition o f
H acilar
t o o ffer .
t he
A natolian a re
d ifferences
e xist
a s
w ell ( Fig . 7 5a) . T he u pper p art o f t he A gios P etros f igurines i s more impressive a nd d istinctive t han t heir A natolian c ounterparts a nd t he g eneral which
m odelling
c losely
o f
t he
f ace
p arallels
t he
i s
q uite
most
d istinctive .
t ypical
o f
t he
T he
o nly
f igurines
e xample
( Plate
i s t hat f ound i n t he Lower C ave o f Agio Gala a t C hios ( Furness, 1 95,
F ig.
1 3:
f igurines, r ecall m ade
1 ) with i ts s trong and r ounded f ace.
h owever, a lthough b earing
t ypical
T hessalian
f inds
t he
3 1b) 1 956:
The Agios P etros
characteristic
z ig-zag
( Plate 2 6a,b) i n t he g eneral
l ine
i mpression
b y t he h ead. The b asic f actor i n e stablishing s uch a n a rtistic i nter-action
which o f t he
c ourse
i s
a c onsequence
c hronological
o f
w ider
c ontemporaneity
o f
c ross
t he
c ultural
f inds
c ontacts,
under
i s
c omparison .
W ithin t he b road c orrespondence o f t he A natolian l ate n eolithic - e arly chalcolithic p eriod and t he Greek n eolithic, c ertain c omparative s tudies A gios
h ave
b een
P etros
s ettlement
i nitiated
a re
( Mellaart,
r eported
a s
which c hronologically
millennium
and
r oughly
1 975).
d ating
f rom
c overs
c orresponds
t o
A ll
o f
t he
main
t he
t he
f irst
f igurines phase
h alf
o f
t he Hacilar VI-I
i n
o f
t he
the
5 th
material.
P arallels b etween t he H acilar f igurine material a nd t he T hessalian h ave b een d rawn b efore ( Ucko, 1 968); t hey c over g eneral p oints such a s s imilarities among f at f emale i dols, s eated f igurines a nd t he modelling o f
t he
f lesh .
A part
f rom
a Thessalian f igurine
h ead whose eyes
t heir r epresentation b ear s ome s imilarities w ith e xamples ( Chourmouziades,
1 974:
P late
6 ),
i t
i s
t he
material
f rom A gios
P etros
which f or t he f irst t ime o ffers s pecific a nd u ndisputed e vidence c lose r elation b etween t he f igurine t raditions o f t he t wo a reas. Thus
i t
s eems
t hat
t he
f igurines
s tylistic a nd c ultural e lements a way which There
i s
p roduces
a n eed,
b orrowing o f t han
t he
e lements
t o
f eatures a ffect
r esult
i tself
w ith a g reat
s tress t he
which
r esult t hat
i nitial
i n
d egree
Agios
P etros
o f
a
c ombine
f rom more t han o ne g eographical a rea i n
a d istinctive
h ere,
f rom
i n
f rom H acilar
i ts
o f
with
t he
i ts
own
c onception o f
f inal
f orm
i ndependence .
c haracter.
s imilarities t he
i ncorporates I t
i s
a nd
work
v ery
the
r ather
d ifferent
l ikely
t hat
w e a re d ealing w ith e xamples r epresenting a f igurine t radition which i s a n i sland d evelopment. e xtent c lose
and t o
nature
t he
o f
G reek
We have n o more t han i ndications
t his
t radition and i ts o rientation :
mainland
and
i nfluenced
e stablished Thessalian r epertoire, o ther
c oast
e xploration
o f o n
i slands make f eatures
i t
t he A egean . t he
western
impossible
which were
A gios P etros . westwards
The c oast o f
l ack
o f
o f
r ich
s ystematic
o f A sia M inor t he
a nd
t o
t he
p attern o f
t he A natolian s ites
I t i s e ven more d ifficult
movement
t he
t o
t he
a lthough and
l ong-
i t i ncorporates e lements f rom t he
t o e stablish
t ypical
b y
a s
d ecide
a rchaeological e astern A egean d istribution
o f
a nd a lso p resent a t whether
t hese characteristics with a ll
t here
was
a
t he c ultural
implications t his might have o r whether t his i s an i ndication o f t he
6 9
a ccessibility o f t he A egean a rea f rom d ifferent g eographical a reas. S trong e vidence f or s uch a ccessibility d eriving f rom a nd r elated t o t he f igurine
material,
A gios P etros The
c omes
( Plate
n orthern
d istribution e stablished
f rom
t he s o c alled r od h ead f igurine f ound a t
2 8). o rigin
t hrough
o f
t he
( Nandris,
t he
r od
s outhern
1 970:
2 04,
h ead
t ype
B alkan
F ig.
2 ).
( Fig .
7 6).
T he f igurines
f igurine
a nd
and
Greece
i s
i ts well
I n Greece t hey h ave b een
f ound i n C orinth, C haeronea, E latea, Z erelia, N ikomedeia
o f
a rea
T sangli,
O tzaki a nd N .
f rom T sangli a lthough u nstratified
w ere f ound a ssociated w ith p ainted wares while t he s ame s eems t o b e t he c ase f or t he examples f rom Chaeronea and C orinth .
The f igurine f rom
A gios P etros s hould p robably b e c onsidered among t he e arliest s ince o f
i t
was
f ound
i n a n e arly
m iddle n eolithic c ontext.
t he 6 th o r b eginning o f t he 5 th m illennia would
f or t he f irst The
r od h ead
o ccurrence
c ontext
o f
a
o f
s mall
u ndoubtedly o f g reat t he
r od
h ead
c ommon
d etails o f a nd
o f
such
r epresenting
t he b ody . t he
i n I t
v arious
characteListics
p erhaps
a d istinctive
importance . i n
B ut
t he i s
i t
t he
o f
a s tyle
o r
t he
t he t he
t he
r ange
d etails,
n eolithic A egean
a ppearance
s ometning
p resenting
more
b etraying
i s o f
t han a s imilar
c odified anatomical
method o f
e xecution o f
t he
d etails
which a re
i mportant
t he
f act
t he p resence o f t he f igurine i tself? ( diffusion)
i n o f
t hat
s uggests
e xecutional
f eatures
t rait
middle
c ertain
s ites
o r even
i s
s econdary
t he e nd
a l ikely
f igurine f ound i n G reece.
s ettlement
f igurine
method
d ecorative
t ype o f
s eem
i n G reece
T hus
o r
o f
A re we d ealing with t he s pread
t ransportation o f
a ctual
o bjects?
I f
i t
i s t he f irst t hen t he whole i ssue must b e c onfronted a s a s tylistic matter
where
d etected
o riginal
among
o ccurrence o f
t he
t he
f eatures
f igurines
a nd o f
e lements
t op-knot o n s ome o f
b oth a pproaches
f ace
t he
s ame
evolution
r egions
t he e xamples .
t he problem b ecomes more c omplicated. t hat
o f
d ifferent
t rait
o f
a s
c ross
t he
c oncerned,
c ultural
s pecific t hey
a re
c ontacts .
f eatures
p roblem,
w ell
N evertheless
o f
d efined
t he a nd
u se o f i ncisions i n many e xamples, r ather o f
t han d ecorative .
c haracteristics
f or
t he
f irst
t ime
f requently .
A nd
t he
t o
B alkans
f rom
namely
i t
i s
r od
i t
h ead
i s
t ype
t o
d istinctive
f igurine
t he Greek
a pparent o f
t he
t hat
f igurine
a nd d espite
t he
c lear
e xplain
c ulture o r a s a
t he
a s a re
f ree
t heir r ole r emains a lways f unctional
T he d istribution o f t owards
b e t he
I n t he s econd c ase
t he
a rea
c an a s
H owever, i t must b e s tressed
c ultural s ignificance o f t he f igurine e ither within o ne f ar
s uch
where
t his
r egions
t hat
where
t ype s hows a d iffusion t he
a d istribution
r egion
t hrough t he
o f
was
manufactured
s ame
t ype
t hese
o ccurs
t raits
f rom
Macedo-Bulgarian a rea
d uring t he F irst T emperate N eolithic c an b e e stablished. I f
i t i s
t rue
t hat
t he r od h ead f igurine e volved i n t he a rea o f
t he F irst T emperate N eolithic where t he o riginal t ime i nvented,
t ype was
f or t he
f irst
t hen i t i s r easonable t o a ccept t he d iffusion o f t his
t ype t o o ther a reas and t o t race t he d irection o f t hat p rocess.
The
existence o f s uch a f igurine a t Agios P etros may well b e s een i n t he c ontext o f a lways a nd
i n
t he c ultural c onjunction
t he G reek a rea
1 970:
2 06).
implications o f
w ith o ther
s uch a s
t raits
c eramic
G eographical
and
t his d iffusion p attern a nd
s hared
f eatures
b y t he
a nd
environmental
f acilitated t he e stablishment o f c ultural
7 0
s outhern B alkans
c lay o bjects f actors
c ontacts
and
( Nandris,
would
have
c ommunication
r outes
i ncreasing
t he
i nteraction b etween t he t wo r egions.
I t s eems t o
me t hat i f t he c riteria u sed f or t he e stablishment o f t hese c ontacts w ere l ess g eneral a nd t he t heories d erived f rom t hese l ess r igid t hen i t would b e p ossible t o a void o ver s implifications s uch a s t he c oncept o f B alkanization. F or e xample
i t
i s v ery d ifficult
t o f ind g enetic r elations b etween
t he p ainted and i ncised p ottery o f Thessaly a nd t he southern B alkans s ince
a dequate
r adiocarbon d ates a re s till u nobtainable
a nd t he s tratigraphic e vidence f rom many o f f ragile o bjects
( Theochares a re,
1 973).
I b elieve,
T hus
more
s pecific
r eliable
t o
r od
b ecomes
h ead
more
f eatures
t he d egree
a nd f requency c an b e s ecurely d etermined. P etros
N ikomedeia)
s ites
and
i s v ery
i ndividual
t heir d istribution
I n t hat r espect t he Agios
f igurine
e stablishes
a s trong
i nteresting
c onsidering
t he
B alkan
c onnection
g eographical
s ite and i ts r elations with o ther r egions; f act
( N .
t he e xcavated
p osition
which o f
t he
t he implications o f t his
a re d iscussed f urther b elow ( see s ection 8 ).
D espite t he f oreign e lements d escribed a bove, t he f igurine materi al o f A gios P etros i s f or t he most p art T hessalian . T he s eries o f t at f emale a nd c ross s haped examples
r ecall
s imilar f inds
P rodromos a nd o ther Thessalian s ites ( Theochares, 1 974) .
A ll
t hem
f emale
t he b ody a lthough ,
h as survived ( Fig. f igurines
6 8:
u nfortunately,
4 -7).
F rom
t he
S esklo,
o nly t he l ower p art
7 3 such naturalistic
f ound i n Thessaly o nly 5 h eads
s urvived which a re
characterized b y a c ylindrical n eck a nd a l ong f ace. b elieves
f rom
C hourmouziades,
t he n aturalistic f igurines f rom A gios P etros s how a s imilar
r epresentation o f o f
1 973,
t hat
t he
s pecific
f eature
o f
t his
Chourmouziades
t ype o f
f igurine i s
t he
existence o f b reasts and t he h ands which were put a bove o r b elow t he b reasts ( 1974;
P late 4 4).
a tions
f ound
t he
h ave
b een
g eneral
moulding
c ategory .
A lthough i n Agios P etros n o s uch i ndic-
I would
o f
t he
a gree
w ith
f igurines
t o
t his
o f
t he f emale b ody ( Theochares,
t his
l eave
S uch n aturalistic o r
e ven
H owever, t he
t his
l ying
o r
e specially moulding
f orm o f
o f
b elong
r epresentations
1 973, P late 3 6) a re not by any means f inds
a re
1 964) and Anatolia ( Mellaart,
f igures
a nd
t hese
b ecause
t hey
r eported
f rom
1 965, F ig. 1 03).
f emale r epresentation must b e d istinguished f rom
s eated
S esklo
t hat
r ealistic
l imited t o t he T hessalian r egion s ince s imilar N . N ikomedeia ( Rodden,
i nterpretation
n o d oubt
which a re
P rodromos
e xamples
a nd
a lso
c ommon
( Chourmouziades, t he
p osition o f
i n Thessaly
1 974,
t he
F ig .
l egs
n iscent o f Anatolian examples f rom Hacilar ( Mellaart,
i s
1 7) . v ery
a nd T he
r emi-
1 970, I I:
1 86)
and t here i s n o d oubt t hat a c lose r elationship b etween t he f igurine material o f t he two a reas i s p ossible. A gios P etros ( Fig.
6 1:1)
The new s eated f igures
c an b e s een a s a variation o f
f rom
t his category
a nd q uite c lose t o t he well k nown s quatting t ype . The s chematic c ruciform and " acrolith" examples ( Fig. 6 7, a re
u sually
s equence a nd p ainted 2 5).
c onsidered i ndeed a s
e xamples
f rom
o f
l ate
neolithic
b elonging t o i ts
R akhmani
i ndicate
date
i n
t he
6 6:3)
Thessalian
l atest p hase a s t he t ypical
( Wace-Thompson,
1 912:
4 9,
F ig .
I n Agios P etros, h owever, t hey a re r eported f rom a c lear middle
n eolithic c ontext. A gios P etros ( Fig. T sani Magoula ;
A variation o f t he c ruciform f igurine, 6 7:
f ound i n
4 ) shows s ome p arallels with an example f rom
t hey b oth s how t he s ame method o f r epresenting t he a rms
which a ppear n ear
t he
b eginning
o f
7 1
t he
n eck ( Wace-Thompson ,
1 912,
F ig .
9 1).
T he s ame i dea o t
s een
i n
a n
earliest
r epresenting t he a rms o n t he s houlders c an b e
e arly n eo1ithic
f ound
f igurine
K nossos,
t hat
6 4).
o rigin o f
i t
o f
much
was
t he
" acrolith"
d iscussion
p ointless
r epresentation was
( Ucko,
t o
i nvented
t he c onstruction i s q uite a w ide a rea
6 2:4).
t he
d ate a re
The
F ig.
I X,
s ite many more t ypical c ruciform f igurines o f e arly n eolithic
s ubject
1 964,
S tratum
t he s ame
( Fig.
t he'site ( Evans,
f rom
F rom
r eported
o n
( Balkans,
a lso
a s
1 968 :
l ook
f or
t he
f or t he f irst
s imple a nd
H acilar,
a f igurine
3 87).
U cko
p lace
f orm
r ightly
where
t ime s ince
was
t his
t he
t he
c oncluded f orm
o f
i dea
o f
whole
t he p laces where i t a ppeared c over
C atal H i lyük,
C rete,
T hessaly).
I ndividual c haracteristics f ound i n t he f igurine material o f A gios P etros o ccur i n t he T hessalian t radition a s w ell: A .
The
r epresentation
o f
a h at
T hessalian e xamples
which ,
p retation .
c haracteristic
A very
h owever,
o r
t end
h air
t o
c oiffure,
f rom t he t ypical Agios P etros f inds,
s tyle
s upport
i s
t he
k nown
l atter
f rom i nter-
a lthough q uite d ifferent
c an b e s een i n a f igurine f rom
Achilleion ( Chourmouziades, 1 974, P late 9 7 b ottom r ight, T heochares, 1 973, F ig. 2 24). I t s hows a lmost t he s ame method o f h olding t he h air t ogether
a s
t he
d ifference b eing t he o n
t emples . t op
o f
another
f igurine
A nother
t he
way
f rom
Agios
t he s hape o f t he
h ead o f
e xample
f rom
a c onical h at
r epresenting
P etros
( Plate
t he
n eolithic
( Wace-Thompson,
t he
h ead
c over
s ite
B . t he
T he
f ragments
f emale
which
f igurines
t he
c lose
6 9:
r ound
c haracteristic o f many c ases
e xample P late
t he
e arly
The p illow
m iddle
n eolithic
f ind
l ike
s hape o f f rom
only
D oundtza
F ig .
a pparent
14)
i n h as
while
i n a small
( 1912,
F ig.
7 2).
s ection - b ellies
s imilarities
examples ( Fig . b utton i s
5 ).
r epresent
have
t he
i ncisions
a t
1 912,
i s
f igurine f rom t he m iddle n eolithic d eposit o f T sangli
o f
2 5),
c oiffure a nd t he l ack o f
with
t he t he
-
T hessalian
b elly with i ts
mainland,
a s
f rom P rodromos ( Chourmouziades,
f or
1 974,
1 1). C .
mouth
O ther
a nd
d etails
e ars,
i n
a lthough
p articular
f ollowing
f acial
t he
f eatures
T hessalian
s uch a s
t radition ,
eyes,
a re
n ot
s olely c haracteristic o f o ne r egion . These a re, I b elieve, g eneral methods o f r epresentation a nd n ot s pecific c haracteristics a ssociated with a c ultural a rea . C ultural r egions m ay w ell h ave b een l inked w ith a h ighly i ndividual way o f r epresenting f eatures l ike t he e yes a s i s t he c ase w ith t he H acilar f igurine material s imple
i ncision,
s traight
o r
o blique,
b e p ut i n t he s ame c ategory. t he
Greek
examples
must
o f
b ut I d o n ot t hink t hat t he
t he
T hessalian
t radition
c an
The c offee b ean o r wheat s eed s hapes o f
b e
s een
more
a s
g eneral
t han
s pecific
c haracteristics. D .
The " bird l ike" f igurines o f A gios P etros ( Fig. 6 6:1) r ecall
s imilar e xamples
f rom T hessaly .
l ike"
o f
and
a ppearance
f igurines
A lthough t he g eneral
f rom
s ome
wrongly i nterpreted ( Gimbutas,
s ites
1 972:
7 1,
h as
i dea o f
t he " bird
b een o veremphasized
1 982),
i t
i s
t rue
t hat
s ome o f t hese f igurines t end t o c reate t he i mpression o f a f ixed t ypef orm. Theochares b elieves t hat t he b ird l ike a ppearance o f t he f igurines
i s
a r esult
o f
t he
narrowing
7 2
o f
t he
h ead
i n
t he
middle
n eolithic
( 1967:
n aturalistic
t o
1 49)
a n e xaggerated v iew. c ase
o f
i n
s chematic
swelling
t o
t he
g eneral
H owever,
movement
I b elieve,
f rom
t his
i s
' Overemphasis o f s ome s pecific f eatures a s t he
l ips,
r epresented mouths,
a ccordance
r epresentation .
d isproportionate
i s
noses
and
p lastically
s ometimes a matter o f p ure c onstruction and
i mprovisation. P arallels
b etween A natolia a nd
t he G reek mainland h ave b een d rawn
l ong ago and b efore t he new e vidence f rom Agios P etros c ame t o l ight ( Weinberg, b etween
1 951:
t he
f ormulated, f igurines i ndicates
5 5,
l ying
M ellaart,
f emale
1 958 :
f igurines
1 54).
T hese
e specially
a s
a c haracteristic
( Chourmouziades,
f igurine
f rom
e xamples
Thessaly
f rom H acilar
b een a ttempted
T hessalian
i nclude
t he
way
c omparisons t he
l egs
a re
t he moulding o f t he b ody a nd t he g eneral p osture o f t he early
1 974,
n eolithic
P late 2 9).
s ites
( 1974,
P late
( Mellaart,
b etween
s uch
a s
6 )
P late
s eated
P yrasos
f rom
r ecall 2 25) .
eyes
t ypical A nother
male f igurines
( Theochares,
1 959A :
Otzaki
t he o ccurrence o f
t he a lmond l ike
which
1 970,
t he
f ind
R arer i s
o ther i ndividual c haracteristics such a s
h as
i n
o f
a
A natolian c omparison
f rom various
2 9)
a nd
t he
male
marble f igure f rom Catal Hüyük VI in Anatolia ( Mellaart, 1 963, P late XXII A-B);
p arallels have
r esting
t he
o n
l egs
and
b een d rawn i n
t he
i ncorporated with t he chair .
way
i n
t he
t he
p osition o f
b ack
o f
D espite t he t act
t he
t he
hands
f igurine
i s
t hat t hese c ases a re
i solated t here i s no d oubt t hat t he material o f t he two a reas show a c lose r esemblance .
I n t hat r espect
t he f inds f rom A gios P etros c ome
t o
s upport much more f orcefully t he i dea o f a n i ndirect c ross c ultural l ink. The Agios P etros examples a re more i ndicative b ecause, I think, t hey a re more s pecific f actor i s,
b asically,
a nd
l ess
e asy
t hat s ome o f
n ot f ound i n t he G reek mainland a nd f irst
t ime
c an
b e
c onsidered
a s
t o
o versimplify .
t he A gios P etros
c ultural
r egion .
E ven
t he
5 0 f igurines many
which a re not t ypical o f t he n eighbouring mainland t radition i s
i tself
v ery
f igurine
important
f inds
a re
and
o nly
c an o ne
s uggesting t hat A egean i slands i ndependent
neolithic
t he
f igurine
b e
material
i s
i nterpreted
a spect
o f
w itnessed
c ultural
d ifferent g eographical r egions . a s
s ignificant
t hey o ccur i n a n a rea which f or t he
a s eparate
f act t hat a small e xcavated a rea p roduced a n umber o f o f
T he
c haracteristics a re
t he
i nto
b ut
h ad
t he
s omething
p resent
s tate
u nderstand
t he
c ultural
new o f
with
c apacity
i ts
k nowledge
r ole
o f
t he
own
t o
Aegean
c ontact
i nfluence
o ver
t he c ultural e volution o f
t hat
t raits f rom
l east
f ound o n a n i solated i sland i n t he middle o f must
o ne
l east a s
and
f ar
f unction
t he d ifferent
c haracter. i t t he
i s
not
extent
t he G reek mainland .
t hree d ifferent
l east t he d irection which o ur a ttempts
a t
b etween A natolia
i slands
i slands
h owever,
t hat a t
t ransform
t he
The
e vidence
t he A egean d id n ot
d istinctive
a bout
o f
ways. o f
w hich c ombined t raits f rom
I t i s s ignificant c oncerned
many
r ange
emergence
t radition
s imply a s a n i ntermediary o r a s a z one o f G reece
i n
a wide
With
o ur
e asy
t o
o f
t heir
T he
f act,
c ultural a reas have t he A egean ,
a nd
t raits
b een
e stablishes a t
f ollow .
As f ar a s t he d ating o f t he f igurines i s c oncerned, most o f t hem s eem t o b elong t o a n early date i f o ne goes b y t heir r elation t o w ell e stablished Thessalian r epertoire .
I t
i s d ifficult
f or s ome
t o b e a ssigned s tylistically t o one c ultural phase b ecause
73
t he
t ypes
t hey are
c ommon t hroughout
t he n eolithic p eriod a s i n t he c ase o f t he f at f emale
r epresentations .
I t
o f
i s
t rue
t hat
c ertain
t he m iddle n eolithic r epertoire
t he P roto-Sesklo p eriod whole
f igurine-making
( Theochares, p rocess
c riterion f or d efining c ultural The
small
p articularly t hose
f ound
i n
N ikomedeia. b etween
c lay
b e
4 6,
f ound
6 9:
S esklo,
i n
6 ).
t he
I t
i s
A rgissa
T hessalian e xamples
which h ave
t ype o f
" ear-plug"
" studs" which a re made i nterpretations ( Nandris, this
1 8) a nd t he
a s
s ummer o f
a nd
t he
a d efinite
o f
s ame
f urther
a f lat
and h ave a p ointed l ower p art ( 1967: 8 3).
t hat
1 6,
1 981
i s
s hape
a s
n orth
i n
N .
T heochares suggests a p ossible t ypological d istinction
t he
t his
F ig.
c onsidered
p lugs" which c ome f rom o ther s ites s uch a s N . t hat
c haracteristics
p hases.
( Fig.
S ouphli,
1 973:
c annot
" ear-plug"
i nteresting
t ypological
i n Thessaly h ave b een t raced b ack t o
object
i s
i s
q uite
b ase a nd t hose " ear-
N ikomedeia a nd H acilar V I
I t s hould a lso b e s tressed
d ifferent
f rom
what
a re k nown a s
o f s tone a nd h ave b een s ubject t o v arious 1 970 : 1 98) . T he important t hing i s, h owever,
a lways
f ound
e ither
i n
p receramic
o r
e arly
n eolithic l evels. 5 .6.
O bsidian a nd t rade: A c onsiderable
a mount
o f
o bsidian was
A gios P etros d uring t he e xcavations,
r ecovered
f rom
t he
s ite
o f
while many worked p ieces a nd waste
material w ere f ound s cattered o n t he s urface; f our b lades w ere a lso b rought o ut f rom t he s ubmerged p art o f t he s ettlement . C onsidering t he small p art o f
t he s ite which was e xcavated a nd t he l ack o f a dequate
r ecording, i t i s d ifficult t o o btain a r epresentative p icture o f t he a ctivities r elated t o obsidian working ( see A ppendix VII). A lthough t he r esults o f t he a nalysis o f t he o bsidian f rom A gios P etros a re n ot y et k nown,
a M elian p rovenance i s v ery l ikely ( Dr W arren p .c.).
I t s eems p robable t hat t he p osition o f Agios P etros might have f avoured a f low o f obsidian f rom Melos, a lthough i t i s d ifficult t o d etermine t he n ature o f t his
movement
which undoubtedly experienced
f luctuations d uring d ifferent p eriods, n ot o nly i n q uantity b ut a lso i n t erms o f c ultural s ignificance. T he p resence o f s uch a n amount o f obsidian on t he s ite, s ized
s ettlement,
t o Agios P etros f orward
n ot
t o o ther
i ntermediary a s trong
p erhaps
j ust
f or
p laces;
s o
p ost .
I ndeed ,
i ndicator
t hat
existed,
t he
obsidian
f ar exceeding t he r equirements o f a modestly-
i ndicates
t hat
l ocal t he
t he
s ite
may have
t he g eographical
i f
a n
s ite
o rganized must
a nd
h ave
h owever,
i s n ot
was
c lear .
w ell
t ransported
a lso t o
b een
b e s ent
s erving
p osition o f
p layed
f acilitating t raffic i n many d irections. t rade o bject,
material
c onsumption b ut
t he
an
i s o f
important
r ole
t he f orm o f
" workshop"
r eported
b y
T heochares
f rom
t he
t opsoil
s imply t he spot where o ne c ore o f obsidian h ad b een waste
material,
b lades
a nd
i n t he
Waste material o f a s pecific t ype
which will i ndicate t he working o f c ores h as not b een f ound. c alled
a n
t rade
e stablished
What was
a s
i sland
f inished
t ools
were
p roved
worked
f ound
The s o
i n
t o
b e
a nd
i ts
s itu.
I n
a ddition, c ores o f obsidian, which might h ave b een t he f orm i n which t he
material
t herefore , worked p roducts
was
t ransported ( Torrence,
p ossible
e lsewhere t o
a reas
t hat and
s uch
o bsidian
t hat a s
was
Agios
T hessaly .
7 4
1 982 :
1 93),
imported
P etros I f
was
A gios
t o
a re
l acking .
t he
i sland
d istributing P etros
was
I t
i s
a lready
f inished
d istributing
o bsidian a lso
o ver
a w ide
mainland
s ites
a rea
must
o f
t he
h ave
t he c ase , t here i s a n eed t o t erms f or s ea o r l and r outes. A s
t he
c ultural
t raits
n orthern A egean n ot
b een a t
t he
r econsider
o f
o nly
r eceiving e nd .
t he
m eans
o f
i slands I f
b ut
t his
was
c ommunication
n orthern o rigin f ound
i n
i n t he s ettlement
s how, i t i s p ossible t hat i n many i nstances c ommunication b y s ea might h ave b een p referred e specially i t i t i s a ccepted t hat l and r outes imposed
c onsiderable
mountainous
a rea
physical
p roblems
b etween Thessaly
and
a s
i s
t he
c ase
Macedonia .
c onsiderable amount o f t rade i s c arried o ut
I f,
with
t he
h owever,
a
b y s ea t hen i ts s ocial-
e conomic a nd c ultural s ignificance must b e d ifferentiated f rom t he c orresponding l and i nvolved .
t rade
T he s eaborne
e conomic s ystem
s ince
t rade
b asically d ifferent
mechanisms
a re
r equires a more c omplex t echnological a nd
i n t erms o f o rganization a nd
i ncentives while
t he
l and
t rade c omes a s a n atural c onsequence o f more t raditional f orms o f c ommunication and r eciprocal exchange o f g oods; l and t rade i s a s omewhat s imple e nlargement o f i nternal t rade models w ithin t he v illage while i n t he c ase o f i nsular c ultures
t he u se o f
t he
t erm
" internal" i s
p roblematic. Nevertheless i t i s c ertain t hat t rade a s a n e conomic f actor d id not d etermine t he a ctual existence o f c ommunities i n t he s ense t hat e verything d epended o n t he o utcome o f p ermanent 1 981: t he
f arming c ommunities
3 07),
which e nsured
wherewithal
p roduction A part
t he
from
t o
p lan
a bsence
t he
t hese a ctivities.
p robably p ractising
t heir s ubsistence ; l ong j ourneys
o f
o bvious
a n umber
a nd
o f
a t
a lso
p eople
t echnological
They were
g ardening
( Halstead,
t he s ame t ime t hey h ad t o
f or
b alance
i n
t erms
a c onsiderable
a dvances
r equired,
o f
t ime.
f or
t he
s eaborne t rade r aises f ar more a cutely q uestions a bout t he k ind o f i tems which c ould h ave b een t raded a nd t heir s ocial a nd e conomic v alue. I t
i s
h ere
t hat p arameters s uch a s d istance a nd q uantity c ome u nder
c onsideration i n a m uch m ore c omplex w ay. A s l ine
R enfrew
exchange
h as and
p ointed o ut, p restige
t he e xternal
c hain
( 1972:
t rade models o f d own t he
4 71)
may
have
a d ifferent
a pplication when s ea t ravel i s i nvolved . I t i s p ossible, i ndeed, t hat t he c ontact z one i s not r elated o nly t o t he d istance f rom t he s ource t owards which
t he
n earest
depends
c ommunication
c oastal
on
a reas
occupation
which
i n
t he
b ut
f ollows
densities
c ase
o f
i slands
r easonable t o a ssume t hat
i f a chain o f
s ettled
Melos
o n
S aliagos,
t he
r oute
f rom
s ites
c oastal
s ites may h ave p layed a r ole
t rade
must
have
r ecently s uggested Moreover n eolithic t rade
and
o f
r educed
b ut
t heir
a more
( Renfrew,
s ince
p eriod,
d ocumentation
i nland
b een
c omplicated . c ommunities
s ame
t he
t ime
( Sahlins,
1 972)
i s
c onsiderably . c ontribution
f rom was
a
O f
c ourse
mainland
and
i n
t erms
l ocal
o f
s cale
e xternal t han
t he
8 5).
l acking
i n
actual
t o
b e
o f
t he
a rchaeological
o ur d escription o f p rocesses
cultural exchange are bound
7 5
i s
were
f inds t here
t he e conomic a nd s ociopolitical c ontext
i n general,
o f
I t
i n d istributing c ertain i tems s uch
l imited
1 977:
t he
p attern
net works
t he s ignificance o f t he mainland
c oastal
a s o bsidian f urther
b een
b e
t o t he S porades ( as
p reference f or s ea t ransportation, h ave
c an
f lexible
local
maritime
K ea a nd E uboea i ndicate) a nd i f a t must
a more
and
f ormulated
s uch a s
i n a r ather
g eneralised things
way .
a s
i t
T he
t erm
r efers
to
( Shackleton-Rentrew, u sed o f
t o e xplain t he
E urope
not
The
r equirements
o f
t or
1 970);
h owever ,
1 972),
t he means o f
t echnological e ach
s uch a s
i mplies
t wo
Spondylus
d ifterent
distribution
s hells
d istinguishing
characteristics
s ettlement
s ea
n ot
t o
and a lthough exchange models h ave b een
a nd
a re s ome o f t he e lements which s et and d etermine i ts s ocial v alue; d evelopment,
i nstance
or
c haracter o f n on u tility o bjects i n d ifferent p arts
( Renfrew,
c lear.
" trade"
obsidian
must
t he
b etween t hem i s
o f
obsidian,
a vailability
o f
t he
t he
material
t he f oundations o f i ts d istribution t he t rade o f n on u tility objects,
h ave
f ollowed
a d ifferent
p attern
s erving a t rade o r c ommunication s ubsystem b ut
b earing a n i deological a nd s ymbolic
c onnotation .
o t
r ather
N evertheless,
b oth
f unctions a re c haracterized b y b asic e conomic c onsiderations i n t he f irst
i nstance ;
s ignificance , t he i f
s carcity
while
i deological i ndeed
a nd
t heir
d imension .
t his was
s pecialization d etermine
s ocial T he
u se
e stablishes
emergence o f
t heir f unction ,
t he
i tems
t heir v alue
a nd
t echnological
o f
s ocial
o r
p restige,
must h ave f ollowed a l ong p rocess o f
' cultural i dentification ' which f inally d eprived
t hese
objects
o f
a ny
p rofound e conomic s ignificance. I t
s eems
a s eaborn A s
t he
l ikely
t rade
i n
c ultural
t hat
t he
A gios P etros
n orthern
t raits
f rom
c ommanded a l eading p osition i n
A egean
n orth,
t hroughout
west
a nd
t he
e ast
5 th
m illennium .
s how,
p osition o n c ommunication a nd n avigation r outes f acilitated
t he
s ite 's
t he t rading
not only o f i tems s uch a s obsidian b ut a lso o f p erishable materials l ike t extiles, a t whose u se t he d ecoration o f t he A gios P etros p ottery may h int . I n t he c ase o f o bsidian d istribution which p robably was n ot t he main t rading o bject
i t
i s
u nfortunate
t hat
t he e astern
i slands
a nd
t he w estern A natolian c oast h ave n ot p roduced e nough e vidence t o p rove t he d irection o f t he f low o f t he material . I solated o bsidian p ieces o f Anatolian
o rigin
( Ciftlik)
h ave
N ikomedeia ( Shelford, Hodson, Table
1 5.6) and p ieces o f
C ann-Dixon,
1 965:
2 25) .
I t
b een
f ound
C osgrove,
i n
Melian o rigin o ccur s eems,
G reek
Warren,
h owever ,
s ites
R enfrew,
l ike
1 982:
N .
1 91,
i n A natolia ( Renfrew-
p robable
t hat
a n
e astwards
d istribution o f o bsidian f rom Melos must h ave b een more c ommon a t l east f or t he c oastal a reas o f Anatolia, f rom
s ources
c ontacts s ource
i n
i s
d eep n ot
s ome
i nland .
r ealistic and p laces
t han a westwards f low o f material
N evertheless, t he
c ertainly
a s trictly
l ack
c annot
o f b e
o ne
obsidian
way
p attern o f
f rom
a c ertain
t ranslated
i nto g eneral
c onclusions a bout t rade c ontacts s ince t he l aw o f s upply a nd demand d iffers f rom i tem t o i tem . I b elieve t hat t he d istribution o f s pecific o bjects l ike obsidian and t extiles was b ased on a n a lready existing n etwork o f l ocal e xchange p atterns which w ere v ital f or t he e conomic s ubsistence
o f
a lthough n ot
t aking
t he s ocial a nd
small
c ommunities,
p lace
o n
a n
whether
e veryday
s easonal
b asis,
s uch
o r
p ermanent;
c ontacts
t echnological b ackground a gainst which e xternal
c reated t rade a s
a s eparate e conomic p ractice w as e stablished a nd d eveloped. The s ite o f Agios P etros,
surrounded b y o ther h abitable i slands
a nd a t t he s ame t ime l ocated i n a " cross-roads - p osition s eems t o h ave b een p art o f b oth i nternal a nd e xternal t rade ; i nternal, w ith p laces with whom c ommunications were c onstant,
p robably n ot more t han a c ouple
o f days r eturn t rip away and external, c rossing t he A egean s ea t o t he north-west ( Chalkidice), east ( Lesbos) o r s outh ( Euboea, A ttica).
I t
i s d ifficult t o s ay whether o r n ot d ifferent i tems were i nvolved i n
76
e ach
k ind
o f
t rade
o r which o f
d istances e specially i n
t hem
w ere
r elation t o
l ikely
t he
t o h ave
p erishable
t ravelled l ong
i tems f or which
l ittle e vidence e xists. F actors s uch a s p reservation a nd d istance may h ave a ffected t he t ransportability o f c ertain g oods
s uch a s
d airy
p roducts
and
a nimals
f rom p lace t o p lace d efining t hem b asically a s objects o f i nternal t rade; l imitations a ffecting l ong-distance t ransportation o n t he o ther h and
must
s ense, has
h ave
b een
t he
f ragility a nd
s ize o f
c ertain i tems.
I b elieve t hat A gios P etros n ot o nly c orresponds
d escribed
( 1977:
8 5)
a s
a c entral
p lace
I n a
t o what R enfrew
- a g eographical
t erm
a pplied t o a rchaeology - a s upply c entre d istributing p roducts o f external t rade t o s maller l ocalities, b ut a t t he s ame t ime was a n important u nit
i n a n etwork o f
t hat
o ther
z one
w ith A natolia
i n t his
l inks
i n
r espect,
t his a re
o f
missing .
s ites I t
h owever,
t he
S kyros
and
o ccupation
which
would
t o know more a bout
early neolithic s ite o f e astern c oast o f E uboea. I f,
t ransaegean c ontacts .
c hain
I t
h ave
b een
F rom o f
t he
Agios
t he
c ontact
i nteresting, t he
t he
t he
o f
h abitation
the
majority
pattern
o f
t he
o f
s ites
i s
t hen t he whole q uestion o f
c ommunication a nd t rade i s p ut o n q uite a d ifferent T he P lace o f
v ery
t he c ultural a ssemblage o f
s easonal a nd p ermanent s ettlements a re f ew,
5 .7.
i s u nfortunate
c onstituted
b asis.
t he A gios P etros C ulture:
a rchaeological
P etros
b elongs
n eolithic p eriod .
e vidence
mainly
i t
t o
i s
t he
c lear
e arly
t hat
t he
phases
o f
s ettlement t he
G reek
T he p ottery s hapes with t he d eep h emispherical b owls
a nd t he c ollared j ars a re
t ypical o f
t he
e arly t radition which e xtended
f rom Macedonia t o P eloponnesos ( Schachermeyr, c overed the end o f
t he 6 th and
1 976) a nd c hronologically
t he b eginning o f t he 5 th m illennium.
T he f orm o f t he v ases i n Agios P etros,
h owever,
c annot s ubstantiate
f urther subdivisions within t he e arly p eriod b ecause t hey a re t ypes which c ontinue without
a ny s ignificant c hange well i nto t he middle
n eolithic p eriod ( Theochares, f eatures
s uch
a s
t he
l ow
r ing
1 967). b ases,
N evertheless
i ndicate s imilarities with t he e arly s tages o f - P roto-Sesklo)
and
A chilleion p hase . G ala a nd
( Hood,
n eolithic
I )
with
I t i s n oticeable
1 981:
c ertainly
e specially
7 8) .
i t
T he
c annot
phase
o f
e arly b e
t he
c ertain c eramic
employed u sually i n g lobular j ars
t hat
t he
p hase
r ing b ases a re
m onochrome
a scribed
t he e arly n eolithic ( ENI s econd
t o
p ottery
t he
k nown
a bsent
i s
n ot
d iagnostic
F rühkeramikum
Thessalian s equence
d espite
a s
f rom A g .
s ome
( early h andle
s imilarities. I t s eems t he
s tarting
t ar
f rom
t hat i t
p oint
t he
we a ccept t he s o c alled P roto-Sesklo p eriod a s
f or
t ruth .
t he
o ccupation o f
p ainted" s herds a lthough v ery f ew, o f
a n
( at
l east
s tylistically)
b ut a lso i n o ther s ites N ikomedeia ( Rodden, T he t he
e arly
P etros
which
d o e xist .
well
d efined
we
would
n ot
n ot
b e
while " early
B oth f eatures a re p hase
s uch a s E latea ( Weinberg,
1 962:
n eolithic
c ontroversy
A gios
B lack-topped p ieces a re a bundant
o nly 1 962:
t ypical
i n T hessaly 1 58)
a nd N .
2 67). p eriod
i n T hessaly
s urrounds
7 7
i s
w ell d ocumented d espite
c ertain a spects
o f
i ts
d efinition
( Nandris,
1 970:
1 92).
The t hin d eposit o f Agios P etros d oes n ot s eem
t o t hrow a ny n ew l ight o n t he d ebate .
S ince
t he
s ucceeding
early
e ither what o r
n eolithic
t hat
i s
i t
i t
r epresents
k nown
i s
d eposit
i n
where
s herds which a re c lose s tages f rom
o f
t he
t he
T sani
t he
a nd
S ouphli
t ypical
t o
n o
b reak
o ne
i t
i s
t he
f irst
n eolithic
was
f ound
s tages
o f
t radition
I II
m ixed
b etween
p ossible
t he S esklo p ainted
early
s tyle
- ( Theochares,
l atest e arly n eolithic phase
S esklo
a nd
t he
p ottery
i s
p hase
w ith
o f
p ainted
t o t he A 3b ware o f m iddle n eolithic - f ormative
s olid
p eriod i s n ot v ery well o f
t o
monochrome
t here
p hase
s equence a s
s imilar
t he
t he
a t ransitional
t he mainland
s omething
A chilleion
a nd
1 967) .
T he
t ransition
t o t he next middle n eolithic
r epresented i n T hessaly while i n t he m ain s ites
a g ap
p ainted
e xists
wares
b etween
t he
" early
p ainted"
p ieces
p eriod ,
t he A 3
which p revail i n t he n ext
s olid s tyle. A t E latea,
t he o nly s ite i n c entral Greece where early p ainted
material has
b een a ttested s tratigraphically ( Weinberg,
t ransitional
p hase
i s
s till
unclear
a nd
i t
i s
e ven
1 962),
t hought
t he
t o
b e
c ontemporary with t he r ed-on-white ware o f C haeronea b ecause o f i ts a dvanced d ecoration .
I n N .
N ikomedeia t he early p ainted wares a re
f ollowed b y impressed p ottery ( Rodden,
1 965:
8 3) a s i s t he c ase with
t he n orth-eastern and western Thessalian s ites o f O tzaki ( Milojcic, 1 971) N .
a nd
M akri
Magoulitsa ( Papadopoulou, t he
t ransitional
p eriod
1 958 :
3 9) .
I n
r epresented b y t he s econd p hase o f t he s ettlement, A l w ares a nd p ainted s herds o ccur t ogether H owever, s eem
i n A gios
t o p ersist
P etros
r ed-on-cream
a re
s imilar
t o
t he
F ig.
( Faraklas,
t he
e arly
c haracteristic t radition,
c onclusively f rom s ites 9 7); 1 968:
1 931)
s hould
b e
e xisting
i nfluences
t he
1 ).
p ottery
f rom
more
c omplex
a lso
f orms
Moreover
d esigns
which
a re
a lthough
a nd
more
a nd Z erelia ( Wace-Thompson ,
1 912:
t he
l inear
S esklo
p ainted
motifs
o f
t hey p resent c ertain p eculiarities
i f
t he c riterion o f d ecoration i s u sed f or t hen t he
c onsidered u ncommon
l inear d esigns ( Fig. a lready
o f
1 956:
3 10).
G enerally s peaking, 5 :1)
f eatures
k nown p artially f rom
d rawing p arallels with o ther s ites ( Fig .
o f
s outh-eastern T hessalian a nd G reek
s uch a s T sani
s imilar
( Kunze,
s ite
where r ed monochrome
( Theochares,
p ottery g radually employs
l inear d ecorative 1 54,
c oastal
f or a l ong t ime w ell i nto t he s econd s tratum.
t he
O rchomenos
t he
b etween e arly a nd m iddle n eolithic i s
t ypical
7 :2) a lthough t hey c an b e
m otifs s ites
i n
s uch
T hessaly, a s
g ive
H acilar
motifs
i n G reece .
a nd
t he
o f
t he
I n a ddition ,
s ite s ome
s een a s variations o f i mpression o f
C atal
H üyük
A natolian
W est
( Mellaart,
1 965: 1 35). T he c arinated b owl which i s a ssociated with s uch d ecoration i s f urther e vidence p ointing t owards A natolia where i t marks t he
e arly
e arly a nd k ind o f
c halcolithic m iddle
I I
ware
n eolithic
o f
s ites
C atal H üyük
i n
t he
G reek
W est
s ince
mainland
t here
a re n o
e mploying
t his
s hape.
The
e vidence
d ecoration and h elpful. m ainland,
f rom
t he
While
t he
o ther
g eographical
p ottery f orms
t ypical
i n
r egions Agios
c oncerning P etros,
s ite has s trong and e stablished l inks
a re
t he not
with t he
a ffinities with t he r egions o f e astern A egean a re v ery s canty
( Hood,
1 981).
early
d eposit
Only one p iece o f p ainted p ottery i s r eported f rom t he o f
t he
L ower
C ave
7 8
o f
Agio
Gala
i n
C hios
which
may
c orrespond
t o t he e arly c halcolithic p hase o f A natolia ( Mellaart,
1 26, F rench, 1 969: 5 8, H ood, p ainted
s herd
s imilar '
t o
1 981,
F ig. 7 :
t he Hacilar
4 9);
i t
I p ainted
1 971:
i s a r ed-on-cream
ware
with a l inear
p attern, which i s a ssociated with t he c haracteristic f igurine whose r elation with
t he A gios
material f rom 1 972) and i t
P etros
c orresponds
Gala,
h as
b een d iscussed a bove . l ater date
T he
( Renfrew,
t o t he l ate c halcolithic phases o f western
A natolia ( Mellaart, 1 971: l evels
material
t he o ther eastern i slands i s o f 1 19).
I t s eems, however, t hat t he d eepest
o f Emborio ( X-IX) a re r elated t o
t he e arlier r emains o f A gio
t he e arly phases o f Agios P etros a nd c onsequently t o t he l ate
n eolithic o f H acilar ( Hood, R ecent
e xcavations
i n
1 981). t he
c ave
s ite o f
A rchangelos
p rovided t he e vidence o f q uite e arly material ; o f c ave d eposits
i n R hodes
i s a h azardous e xercise a nd g reat
c are h as
i f one i s t o obtain a n a ccurate s tratigraphic p icture, s eems
t o
s uggest
t hat
t he
e arliest
material
h ave
a lthough t he e xcavation
d ates
t o
t o b e
t aken
t he excavator
t he
f irst
s tages
o f t he l ate chalcolithic ( late c halcolithic I phase o f B eycesultan) w ith
white-on-red
p ainted
b urnished p ieces R hodes t he
material
d ate
o f
p osition o f I t P etros
i s i s
i t
the
c halcolithic
o f
s herds,
( Sampson, i s
d ifficult
s ite.
b lack b urnished a nd v ery f ew p attern
1 979:
2 4).
Without
t o j udge
However,
i t
s eems
t he A natolian s equence
t he
i sland o f R hodes
c ertain,
however,
much e arlier
f rom
i s
t he
t han a nything
t hat
s een a ll
a d ate
v ery p robable
( French,
t hat
having
t he
t he f ew p ublished s herds
1 969:
i n
t he
l ate
i n v iew o f
t he
7 6).
main c ultural phase o f A gios
e lse
f ound
s o
f ar
i n
t he
e astern
A egean ( Renfrew, 1 972) s ince t he r est o f t he material and e specially t he important p atterned b urnished p ottery f rom T igani i n S amos s uggests a l ate c halcolithic d ate w ith u ndefined u pper a nd l ower l imits ( LloydM ellaart, 1 962). T he l ack o f s ites i n t he i slands with e arly o ccupation and p ainted material s imilar t o t hat f ound i n t he Konya p lain, i s due not o nly t o i nadequate exploration, b ut a lso t o t he p robabilistic
method
o f
s urveying .
T he
s ame
a ppears
t o b e t he p icture
i n the c oastal areas o f western A natolia where ( French, 1 967B, 1 969) t he p ainted wares s o characteristic o f t he s outh western r egions o f A sia Minor a re extremely r are. R ed-on-white p ainted wares a re c ompletely a bsent i n t he n orth . While monochrome p ottery o f H acilar s tyle
i s
p resent
c onsidered
l uxury
t he Konya
p lain.
i n
western
p roducts T his
Anatolia,
s eem
l ack
o f
t o
h ave
painted
wares
which
d istribution
t o
t he
s uggested a s a p ossible e xplanation f or t he a bsence o f
north
h as
c ertain
t hat
t he
c orrectness
o f
t he
b een
p ainted wares i n
n orth-western Anatolia ( Mellaart, 1 970: 1 46, s ee s ection 6 .7). a lso
a re
a l imited d istribution a round
H acilar-Beycesultan
I t i s
s equence
i s o f v ital importance i n t hat r espect ( Eslick , 1 980 : 5 ) . I t must a lso b e s tressed t hat t he c omparative s tudy o f t he material o f t he i slands a nd
t hus
s tylistic
t he
chronological
g rounds
s ince
t he s ite o f E mborio
t he
( Hood,
r elations
o nly
s ecure
e stablished,
a re
s tratification
i s
b ased
on
p rovided
b y
1 981).
I f we t urn n ow t o t he B alkan a rea and i ts r elations t o t he G reek 5 th
m illennium
c ontroversial
c ultures, i n
i ts
t he
a rchaeological
i nterpretation ,
i s
e vidence,
b etter
a lthough n o
d ocumented .
h ave p layed a n important r ole i n c larifying b asic p roblems sequences
and
chronological
equations.
7 9
The
K ey
l ess s ites
l ike p ottery
excavations
o f
N .
N ikomedeia i n t he V erria p lain a nd o f S itagroi i n e astern Macedonia s ucceeded i n e stablishing c ultural a ffinities a rea
a nd
b eyond
t hat
w ith t he
with t he Macedo-Bulgarian
w ider F irst T emperate N eolithic c ultural
c ontext . Moreover , s pecific t raits h ave b een u sed t o d raw c omparisons with a reas a s f ar away a s Anatolia a nd t he Near East ( Rodden, 1 964: 5 64).
A s
f ar
c oncerned, o f
a s
i ts
t he
e arly
r adiocarbon d ates:
7 4 b .c .-
p hase
o f
N .
N ikomedeia
i s
N .
N ikomedeia ,
E NI
5 607
+ 91
b .c . a nd E NLI
5 331
+
S esklo ENI ( Frühkeramikum 5 661 + 8 3 b .c. a nd 5 477 + 7 8 b .c .-
( Theochares, t here
neolithic
r elations w ith T hessaly a re well e stablished i n a s eries
i s
1 973:
1 19) - Achilleion I B(EN)
a s eries
o f
C 14
dates
5 418 + 5 2 b .c .
a vailable
f rom
N .
A lthough
N ikomedeia
a nd
T hessaly ( Fig. 86) b ased on a 5 568 " half t ime" s ome o f t hese y ears a re unacceptable. very
high
The 6 240 + 1 50 b .c . date f rom N . N ikomedeia i s t hought
s ince
t he
o ther
t hree
a vailable
dates
f rom
t he
early
n eolithic p eriod ( ENI-II) are a ll well i nside t he 6 th millennium. d ate f or middle
t he
o f
f oundation o f t he N . N ikomedeia s ettlement j ust
t he
6 th
f rom S esklo s eem a lthough
t he
millennium
i s
v ery p robable .
t o c over most o f
h ighest
d ate
T he
t he f irst h alf o f
( 5805 + 9 7
b .c .)
l ooks
p re-pottery d ates t he 6 th m illennium
more
p robable .
a s t he e arly neolithic dates f rom S esklo a re c oncerned c over
t he
s econd
s eparation based
half o n
o f
t he
t he
6 th
a vailable
millennium.
C 14 d ates
A
b efore t he
A
A s
f ar
t hey s eem t o c hronological
b etween
the
d ifferent
phases o f t he early n eolithic i n Thessaly i s very d ifficult ( Wijnen, 1 981:
4 8) .
S ince
t he
e arly n eolithic
l evels
o f
A chilleion
( IA ,
I B ,
I C ,
I I) c orrespond t o t he e arly n eolithic s equence o f S esklo ( ENI-II) a s f ar a s t he material i s c oncerned, t he s ame must b e expected f or t he r adiocarbon dates. I ndeed a ll C 14 dates f rom Achilleion s how a c onsiderable
c onsistency a round t he s econd h alf o f
S imilarly
t he s tylistic c riteria s uch a s p ottery and f igurines
p oint t o a c hronology c loser t he
m iddle
o f
t he 6 th m illennium.
t o
t he P roto-Sesklo p eriod,
t he 6 th millennium
s omewhat a fter
a d ate n ot f ar f rom t he f oundation o f
A gios P etros. The d ifference, h owever, b etween t he two s ites i s t hat N . N ikomedeia materially c ombines i nfluences f rom t he north a nd s outh while Agios e astwards;
P etros b ut
g eographical early date .
i t
i s
i s
o rientated
t rue
p osition,
westwards
i n b oth s ites
and
t o a l esser e xtent
u ndoubtedly d ue
t o
t heir
t hese a ffinities a re manifested f rom a v ery
N evertheless,
f rom A gios P etros d oes
t hat
t he unique f ind o f
t he r od
h ead f igurine
l ink t he s ite w ith t he F irst T emperate N eolithic
c ultural r egion a nd i ts A egean r epresentative, N ea N ikomedeia ; a nd I h ave a rgued a bove ( section 5 .5.3) t he s ignificance o f t he d istribution o f s imilar t raits,
which c ombined w ith f irm s tratigraphic o bservations
c an b e v ery u seful.
d ates
The s tudy o f t he c eramic f eatures and t he a vailable r adiocarbon s hows a c onsiderable c hronological c onsistency which a llows t he
d rawing o f
a f ramework w ithin which t he l ifespan o f
b e p laced . F rom t he s amples s ent o nly t wo p rovided a dequate d ates . f rom S tratum f rom
t he
I I,
t opsoil
gave a date 4 .450 + 8 0 l evels,
gave
a d ate
b .c.
t he
c ultural
s equence
o f
t he
8 0
s ite
( BM 2 020);
3 .560
u nfortunately a v ery h igh s tandard o f e rror . w ith
t he s ettlement c an
t o t he B ritish Museum l aboratories T he f irst, a c harcoal s ample, t aken + 3 90
b .c.
t he
s econd,
( BM
2 021)
B oth d ates a re
e stablished
b y
t he
-
c onsistent t ypological
f eatures.
Thus
t he
b eginning
o f
t he
s ite
c annot
b e
f ar
f rom
t he
c losing c enturies o f t he 6 th millennium p robably a round 5 .200-5.100 B .C. Then t he o ccupation c ontinued uninterrupted t hrough t he p eak p eriod o f t he p ainted t radition i n G reece d own t o t he b eginning o f t he 4 th millennium, a p eriod c ontemporary with t he p re-Dimini p hases, a round 3 .800 B .C . T he s ite was t hen r eoccupied a fter a gap o f a f ew c enturies
a t
t he
b eginning
o f Kum Tepe
f oundation o f T roy I ( Mellaart,
1 971:
a ge and a s t he r ubbish p it s hows, i nto
t he n ext
p eriod .
l b a round
1 19) .
3 .500
F ollowing
t he
B .0
a nd
e arly
t he
b ronze
t he s ite c ontinued t o b e i nhabited
U nfortunately
t he
material
f rom
t his
p eriod
unstratified and t hus more e vidence o f o ccupation i s uncertain . s ettlement must h ave c eased t o exist
p robably a t
a pproximately
i s T he
2 .000
B. C. I f G reek
we t ry n ow t o p lace t he b eginning o f A gios P etros i n a wider
n eolithic
d ating
s equence
o btained
b oth
( although
s tylistically
t his
s eems
t o
a nd
u sing
b e a l ittle
t he
r adiocarbon
l ow) we must
p lace
i t s ecurely i n t he l ast s tages o f t he e arly n eolithic a nd t he s tart o f t he middle n eolithic . H owever, a lthough t he c ulture i s f irmly r ecognizable a s middle neolithic,
i t
d oes
not c losely r esemble any
o ther i n t he a rea . A nd t he d ifferences a re n ot o nly s light v ariations i n t he e xecution o f l inear motifs c ommon i n s outh-eastern a nd c entral G reek
s ites
e xpected, f irst
s uch
a s
Z erelia,
t ime
i n Greece and whose
n ecessary, v ery c lose
I b elieve, c onnection
we
understand
are
t o
v arious
T sangli,
i ts
t ypological
a re u navoidable
s tylistic
( Theochares,
t he
which
middle
i s
p rovenance
f eatures.
The u pper l imit o f
i s
a ssociated
f ound
i n
c ould
o f
A t
l ong
1 973:
t he
n eolithic
b e
s ame
P etros
a nd
f lat
S esklo
9 :1) .
must
d uring
I II
H owever,
bases,
t ime,
c ulture,
s ecure,
p erhaps
with T heochares 's
s ides
t he
I t i s
explain
t he
h owever,
t he
s equence
1 19).
Agios
p eriod,
t he
a nd
e stablished Thessalian
s tratigraphically
A gios P etros ( Fig .
s traight
e asy t o d etect.
p eculiarities
A n i mported p iece f rom s outh-eastern T hessaly, i s
which
t o d issociate t he A gios P etros c ulture f rom a ny w ith what we u sually c all t he S esklo s equence i f
c hronological r eferences t o t he
material
O rchomenos,
b ut a lso t he p resence o f f eatures which a re a ppearing f or
f ound
judging
b e
t he
p laced
f rom
a t
p re-Dimini
t he
t he
e nd
p hases .
s imilar t o a s hape which
( the
d estruction
l evel)
was
a n umber o f o pen b owls with
a bove
t he
S esklo
c up
r ecall
examples f rom t he Arapi phase ( Milojcic-Hauptmann, 1 969, P late 1 :1) a lthough t he ware i n t his c ase i s not b lack b urnished ( Fig. 1 1:1). I t i s
i ndeed d ifficult
t he
s ettlement
S aliagos
was
t o e stablish e xactly t he
b ut
I t hink
f ounded,
i n
i t
t he
c an
t ime o f
r oughly
middle
o f
t he
b e
t he a bandonment o f
p laced
s econd
a t
h alf
t he o f
t ime
t he
5 th
m illennium. A s t he
T heochares
A egean
h as
n eolithic
r ightly c an
b e
s uggested, e stablished
a r ough
c ultural
( 1973:
l imited a rchaeological e vidence a vailable,
1 09).
s equence D espite
o f t he
t he e arliest s ite i n t he
A egean f ound o n t he i sland o f S kyros ( middle o f t he 6 th millennium) ( Theochares, 1 959B), must b e f ollowed b y A gios P etros which must h ave b een s ucceeded 3 .700 t he
B .C).
I n
i n t urn b y what r ecent
y ears
i sland o f Kythnos
nature
and
date h as
h as
b een
i s k nown a s
t he
e xistence
b een suggested
t he S aliagos o f
( Honea,
d isputed ( Cherry,
8 1
c ulture
a m esolithic 1 979:
( 4 .300-
c ampsite b ut
o n
1 975:
2 77)
i ts
2 8).
I n a ddition,
m ore
l ate
n eolithic
t he C yclades, g roup
s ites
most o f
w ere
r eported
a fter
a n
i ntensive
( Cherry-Torrence,
1 982:
2 4).
I t
e xtrapolate p atterns o f p rehistoric
i s,
h owever,
o ccupation and
a lways
t o
N othing
s imilar
e ither
i ndustry
i n
s hows
t o
t he
p ottery
c lose
S aliagos f orms
r elations
1 982).
I t
i s
a s imple
a re c onsidered
material
o r
f lint
h as
what
i s
1 967,
a nd
o bsidian
f ound
The
c hipped
i n A gios s tone
k nown
f rom
Moundrea-Agraphioti,
i ndustry
a f ew g eometric m icroliths
t o
o n t he b asis
f ragmentarily
P late X ,
t hem
b een
d ecoration .
with
t he n eolithic T hessaly ( Theochares, d istinctive r etouch ;
i n
r isky t o
a ssign
s pecific c ultures w ith p recise c hronological c onnotations, o nly o f i solated t ypological c riteria.
P etros
s urvey
t hem b elonging t o t he l ate n eolithic S aliagos
without
a ny
w ere a lso f ound which
i n Thessaly a s PPN f eatures ( Theochares,
1 967:
1 20).
T he material d id n ot p roduce a ny i ndividual c haracteristics
which c ould
b e
r etouch a re
u sed
q uite
a s
a b asis
c ommon
1 962).
i n
f or d iscussion s ince
t he
e arly
p eriod
b lades
w ith s imple
i n T hessaly ( Milojcic-Boessneck-Hopf,
I t i s noticeable, h owever, t hat t he c hipped s tone i ndustry i n
g eneral d oes not indicate a ny t echnological i solation o f t he i sland. A t
t he
r aw
s ame
t ime
i t
materials.
e xtensively u sed A ppendix p resence
f or
V II).
c hocolate
s hows
The
only
which
a t A gios
t ypes
o f
f lint
t he manufacture o f
The
f lint
a c onsiderable d egree o f
two
imported
i s
P etros
v ery
o f
t ools
s ickle
I t
b lades
s ufficiency i n l ocally
a re
mainly s ickle b lades ( see
material
r are.
s elf
available
i s
f rom
Thessaly
i nteresting
made
o f
f lint
i s
t he
t o n ote
which
t he
s eem
t o
b e l acking f rom S aliagos a nd t he A natolian s ites ( Evans-Renfrew, 1 968: 8 5) . I n g eneral, t he Agios P etros material i s s imilar t o t he T hessalian c hipped-stone i ndustry a nd i t
d oes n ot
t he d istinctive C ycladic l ate n eolithic
s eem
S aliagos
t o
b e r elated t o
a ssemblage
with
i ts
c haracteristic o vate p oints. C ertain
material
f ound
b e d escribed a s e arly r olled
r ims
a nd
r ecall K um T epe
i ncised l b
i n
u pper
This a nd
r aise
t he
t he
o f r im
whole
t hird s tratum c an
b urnished
b owls
( Fig.
1 ,2)
which
t he
n orth-
1 1:
p roblem
o f
with
f inds a re
a dmittedly very f ew b ut e ven t heir p resence on t he i sland
c an b e o f
s ignificance
t he m ainland a nd T here d eeper 1 972) . o f
t he
l evels T he
t he
s ite 's
g eographical
p osition
b etween
t o b e a b road a greement r egarding a t l east t he g eneral
b etween o f
t he K um
E mborio
t hree
A egean
o f
t he w estern A natolian c oast.
s eems
c orrespondence
b ecause
o nce a gain.
t he
o pen
T he A gios P etros
s ome
s equence
p art
i ncludes
d ecoration o n
e xamples
western A natolian
t he
b ronze .
p hases
a nd
l ater
S perling r ecently ,
a nd
T epe
o f Kum t han
p hases,
P oliochni T epe
l ate
t he
T roy
( Mellaart,
a re
p laced
c halcolithic
i n
s equence
1 971: t he
4 o f
1 19,
f inal
t he
n eolithic
A natolia ,
b asing h imself o n s tylistic c omparisons,
a nd
R enfrew, a lthough
d ates
t hem
q uite e arly a nd p laces t hem c ontemporary w ith l ate c halcolithic 2 a nd 3 a s well ( Sperling, 1 976: 3 05); h owever, h e u sed o nly vaguely r elated p ottery f eatures
f or h is e quation .
T he p ieces
f rom A gios P etros a re o f
l ocal c lay and c an b e dated s tylistically t o t he Kum T epe l b p eriod, r oughly a round 3 .500 B .C . U nfortunately , t he d eposit where t he s herds were
f ound
c annot
b e
o ccupation a re l acking. i ndirect
e vidence
indication
t hat
f or
t he
i solated T hus t he
s ite
and
o ther
s igns
o f
c ontemporary
t hese s herds c an b e c onsidered o nly a s
l ifespan was
o f
t he
i nhabited
8 2
s ettlement,
a t
t he
e nd
o f
a p ossible t he
f inal
n eolithic .
I ndeed
t he
t opsoil
i n
A gios
P etros
g ave
a d ate
3 .560
+ 3 90
B. C. Even more o bscure i s t he p resence o f t he Minyan s herds f rom t he r ubbish p it a nd t he t opsoil . c lay s ince
I t i s l ikely t hat t hey a re not o f l ocal
t he s oapy f abric r equires a t ine
i n t he a rea . imported
A t t he b eginning I t hought
f rom
n orth-western Anatolia
c lay which i s n ot a vailable
t hat t he Minyan s herds were b ecause
t heir
s oapy a nd
p ale
c olour r esembles e xamples f rom t hat a rea more c losely t han t he g rey p ieces
o f
P etros 1 974:
s outhern Greece.
s herds
a nd
t he
s o
A visual
c alled
5 1) i s v ery c onvincing b ut a t
O ptical
e mission
was u sed
s pectroscopy
g rey
( Schweizer,
t hat
o f
t he
l ocal
Kyra
P anagia
h owever ,
H owever ,
c lays
o f
t he A gios
A natolia
( French :
1 974:
1 12,
J ones,
1 980 :
4 9)
f rom Agios P etros ( Appendix I V). Mycenean p ottery
an eastern Thessalian o rigin i s p ossible, G eologically,
ware
t he s ame t ime c an b e misleading.
t o a nalyze e leven s amples
T heir c omposition r esembles
c omparison b etween
I negöl
a l ocal
o rigin
a T hessalian s ource
f rom V olos .
T hus
b ut a s we h ave n o d ata t or i s
c annot
b e
r uled
o ut.
p referred.
t he whole p roblem o f t he i ntroduction o f Minyan ware i nto
t he G reek r egion, i ts g enetic o r o ther r elationship with t he n orthwestern c oast and t he e xistence o r not o f l ocal g roups, i s v ery much o pen t o d ebate
( French,
1 974:
5 1).
T he duration o f t he o ccupation o f Agios P etros c an b e e stimated o nly
f rom
d eposit .
t he
T he
c ultural
l atter
s equence
makes
i t
g aps o r e ven p eriods d uring o f
B arbotin and
c ultural
g ap .
C ardium
H owever ,
which
wares
i t
i s
p rovided
e xtremely t he
b y
t he
d ifficult
s ite
i n A gios
impossible
was
i dentify
a bandoned .
P etros t o
r elatively
t o may
T he
a bsence
i ndicate
s ubstantiate
t hin
c ultural
s uch
s uch a a c laim
s tratigraphically a nd I t hink i t i s more l ikely t hat t he a bsence o f Pre- S esklo
characteristics
d ifferentiation a s where
impressed
gap.
I n any
f eatures a s t hese T he
wares
c ase,
i s
rather
h ave
a re
m issing
a part n ot
c onvincing
a
f rom
a nd
n ot
a n
b een
d efined
i ndication o f
C utting Z where a s tratum t he
i mpression o f
regional
f ull
a l ayer
o f
t he
t he
r eal
c ultural
r esult
o f
t erms .
which d oes
c ame d uring t he d ig o f t he
d estruction .
i n t he p ottery r epertoire c an was
a c ultural
a lteration ,
b roken p ottery and
l ikely
l ayer
i n
a rchitectural o f
o f
c ertain s tylistic
t he E N p eriod i nto s ubphases
a dequately
d ifterences t hat
o f
i ndication
t he r ecognition o f
n ot n ecessarily m ean c ultural d iscontinuity, g ives
matter
t he c ase w ith t he whole o f s outh-eastern T hessaly
c riteria f or t he s eparation o f
p hases
o nly
i s
b e
f allen
H owever,
n o
e stablished
s tones
e ssential and
i t
i s
a l evelling p rocess during
a rchitectural r econstruction . O n with
p urely
o ther
s tylistic
r egions
o f
c riteria t he
t he
Greek
b road
c omparison
mainland
h as
o f
b een
A gios P etros
b ased
o n
t he
e xistence o f t he p ainted wares; f rom t heir f irst a ppearance i n v arious s ites i n t he e arly n eolithic t o t heir d istinct r egional d ifferentiation i n
t he
middle
n eolithic .
Moreover
c orrespondence
b etween
t he
Greek
c oncerned,
t he
p ainted
p ottery
r eference;
and i n t hat r espect
a s
and
f ar
t he
c ontinues i t
i s
a s
t he
c hronological
Anatolian t o
b e
r egrettable
n eolithic
a b asic t hat
s o
p oint
i s o f
l ittle i s
k nown about t he d istribution o f p ainted wares i n t he a rea o f western A natolia .
A lthough t he a ppearance o f p ainted d eocration i n G reece
83
must
b e
s een
i n
r elation
t o
A natolia ,
i t i s n ot a t a ll c ertain t hat
e specially
i ts
s outh-western
t he movement u nder way
i n
t he
only an east t o west direction ( French, 1 965: n evertheless, w idely a ccepted t hat t he p ainted material i s
i n
a b road
s ense
c ontemporary
with
t he
1 5). I t i s, o f H acilar V -I
Proto-Sesklo
p eriod
Thessaly and t he c losing s tages o f t he e arly N . Nikomedeia, a round t he middle o f s ame
p eriod
Mersin
i s
XXIV-XX
in
many ways
a nd
t he
b y
C ilicia
c halcolithic p eriod . i n
t he 6 th millennium.
r epresented
C atal
where
H üyük t he
o n
p ainted
t he
c ulture,
K onya
wares
p lain
a nd
i ntroduced
t he
e quation
o f
r einforces
b etween t he l ate e arly G reek n eolithic
t he e arly c halcolithic I -II o f Anatolia and
c hronological
i n
p robably
E lsewhere i n Anatolia t he W est
T he c eramic r epertoire o f A gios P etros
c orrespondence
r egion,
A egean h ad
H acilar
I a nd
t he
makes
p ossible
b eginning
o f
t he
S esklo
s omewhere a round 5 ,000 B .C.
T he
r adiocarbon
d ates
a vailable
f rom G reece,
a lthough
i nadequate,
c an a lso p rovide a u seful f ramework o f r eference i f t hey a re c ombined with c onventional methods o f dating b ased o n t ypological c riteria ( Wijnen ,
1 981:
a vailable
1 31,
f rom
T able
T hessaly
2 8) .
T he
e arly n eolithic
c alculated
w ith L ibby
u ncalibrated
h alf
l ife
o f
d ates
5 568 y ears
s how a p ersistence a round t he middle o f t he 6 th millennium a s t he r adiocarbon chronologies f rom Argissa ( 5.500 + 9 0 b .c.) and S esklo F rühkeramikum n umber 1 B:
o f
( 5477
d ates
5 418
+ 5 2
+ 7 8,
f or
a ll
b .c.,
b .c .)
t he
I C:
i ndicate ,
while
A chilleion
e arly n eolithic p hases
5 346
+ 5 0
b .c.,
I IAl:
( IA :
5 323
p roduced
a
5 510 + 7 5 b .c .,
+ 7 6
b .c.,
I IA2:
5 296 + 5 3 b .c. ( Gimbutas, 1 974: 2 77). A nother d ate f rom t he e arly d eposit o f Argissa i s quite l ow and must b e d iscounted ( 4420 + 8 0 b .c.). A lthough a ll dates a re uncalibrated, t he h igh c hronologies s uggested b y s ome s hould b e t reated with c aution ( Milisauskas 1 978: 4 8, F ig. 4 :3). O utside Thessaly t he s tart o f t he A gios P etros s hould b e c onsidered E latea phase
e arlier
( 5090
t han
+ 1 30
( 5240 + 1 00
b .c.)
phase i s a ccepted; wares
i s
which
c ome
+ 8 6
t oo
b .c.,
h igh
f rom
t he
b .c .)
f irst
a nd i f
t he
5 754 + 8 1
b .c .)
s tarts
a t
o f
t he
C 14
( Theochares,
b .c.) ( Radiocarbon 1 971: t he
s ame
t he
p ainted
w ith
p ottery
i ts
i n
monochrome
a vailable
f or
t his
f or t he b eginning o f t he p ainted
e arly n eolithic s tratum o f
t he f ramework s uggested a bove, Knossos
o f
c ontemporary
l ower
t he o ther d ate
( 6290 + 1 10
t he
a ppearance
p erhaps
1 973:
1 19) .
Two
d ates
C ave
( 5328
c onsistent
with
t he F rancthi
3 64)
i s
while t he e arly n eolithic p eriod o f
t ime
( Stratum
I X
- 5 620
+
1 50
b .c.).
C onsidering 5 ,000 B .C. a s a middle p oint f or t he f oundation o f Agios P etros, t he s ite must b e c ontemporary i n t he Macedo-Bulgarian a rea with Anza I B which i s a ccording t o G imbutas c ontemporary t o S esklo ( 1976: 3 0); a lthough t here are c ertain s tratigraphic ambiguities s ix C 14 dates ( Fig .
a re 8 5) .
p rovided I n
t erms
f or o f
t he
I B
phase,
s outh-eastern
a ll
B alkan
o f
t hem
a round
s equence,
5 ,000
A gios
r oughly c ontemporary with P orodin ( EN - 5 170 + 1 70 b .c.), ( 4915 + 1 50 b .c. and Karanovo I I ( IB) ( 4857 + 1 00 b .c.). A natolian c hronology t he b eginning o f A gios P etros must
P etros
B .C. i s
Vrsnik I II
I n t erms o f b e c onsidered
c ontemporary with H acilar I ( 5037 + 1 19 b .c.) ( Fig. 8 5). The
main
p hase
o f
Agios
Petros
a s
t he
r adiocarbon d ate
should b e p ut a round t he middle o f t he 5 th millennium.
s hows
Judging f rom
t he c eramic f eatures o f t he s ite, t his d ate i s c ertainly r ather l ower t han would b e expected i f t he p ainted p hase h as t o b e a ssigned t o t he middle
neolithic
p eriod
o f
t he
Thessalian s equence .
8 4
T he r adiocarbon
d ates
a vailable
f rom
S esklo p oint
t o a c hronology a round
t he f irst
q uarter o f t he 5 th millennium ( end o f middle n eolithic I I 4 791 + 1 03 b .c. - l ate middle n eolithic 4 554 + 8 5 b .c. ( Theochares, while 5 2
A chilleion
b .c.,
b .c .) .
I IIa2:
T he d ates
p rovides
a s lightly
5 157
+ 8 6
b .c.,
f rom
F rancthi
I IIb:
C ave
h igher
c hronology
5 136 + 8 5
i ndicate
b .c.,
a middle
1 973:
( IIIal: I nc:
1 19) 4 972
+
5 014 + 8 7
n eolithic
p eriod
a round t he middle o f t he 5 th millennium ( Fig. 8 5) a lthough d ate N o.50 s eems t o b e v ery e arly f or t he b eginning o f middle n eolithic ( 4675 + 1 70
b .c .).
I n
t he
n orthern G reece
A gios
P etros
c orresponds
t o
S itagroi
I( Veselinovo phase 4 475 + 1 00 b .c.) a nd D ikili Tas ( end o f MN, 4 426 + 1 70 b .c., 4 300 + 1 60 b .c.). F urther n orth t he middle o f t he 5 th m illennium and
Obre
i s I I
r epresented ( Fig.
8 5).
i n A nzabegovo In
Anatolia
b y
p hase
the
I II,
f irst
i n
half
K aranovo o f
the
I II 5 th
millennium i s c overed b y t he C an Hasan 2 B radiocarbon s equence ( Fig. 8 5).
85
6 .
T HE GREEK N EOLITHIC O F T HE LATE 6 th a nd
6 .1.
S tate o f O ur
5 th M ILLENNIA :
r esearch:
p resent
k nowledge
o f
t he
n eolithic
p eriod
l argely o n e xcavations carried o ut t he l ast p arts o f a fter
t he c ountry .
a d etailed
e stablished s imply s urface t he
o f
f inds
2 2), N .
o f
o f
a ll
1 962B: 2 5,
D imini
s ite
t he
main
1 901:
( Rodden ,
( Weinberg,
d iscovery;
s uch I t
geographical
t hat a rea,
a s
s ites
1 937:
3 7,
1 962 :
4 87,
2 67),
E latea 1 42,
1 973a:
a f ramework o f
a nd
w e c onsider 1 5,
1 908,
1 972:
8 ,
C hourmouziades,
( Weinberg,
4 5,
t herefore,
b ecause
d eposit
1 971:
1 908,
had
c ases
l ike S esklo ( Tsountas,
T sountas,
3 43,
b est
t hat
Walker-Kosmopoulos,
1 969:
b ased
region
o f
c ontext
and F rancthi
( Jacobsen,
i s
i n v arious
i n most
a t
d epth
( Caskey, 1 954: 3 , 1 955: 2 5, 1 956: 1 47, 1 957: T here i s,
o r
s ize,
i s i n t his
b ut
1 963: 4 0, 1 965: 5 , 1 968: 2 4,
( Stais,
N ikomedeia
C orinth
a ccidental
t he
G reece
t he e xcavated s ites were n ot c hosen
a c ertain
l ooked p romising .
excavations
1 979),
t heir
f eatures
T heochares, 1 973:
o f
t hem a s r epresentative o f
b ecause
external
H owever,
survey
i n
t hirty y ears
1 962 :
1 948)
1 58),
a nd Lerna
1 958:
1 25,
1 959:
2 02)
1 973b:
2 53,
1 976:
7 6).
i nformation about
t he material
r emains o n which a t heoretical f ramework o f t he Greek n eolithic h as b een erected, e ffect
o f
b ut which s uffers
t his
h idden
b ias
i nterpretation a nd i n t he p eriod . .
I t
i s
n ot
t hat
t aken i nto a ccount, r epresentative
o f
b ut
f rom methodological
i s
i ndeed
h eavy
i n
b ias;
t erms
and
o f
t he
c ultural
b uilding u p o f a c omprehensive p icture o f t he g eographical
t he f act,
a whole
a nd
t hat
r egion
a nd
r egional
d ifferences
a re
n ot
c ertain s ites a re e stablished a s h ave
s ignificance i n t he l ight o f t he g eneral
a cquired
a d isproportionate
s tate o f knowledge f or t he
a rea ; t his i s n ot t o q uery t he v alidity a nd methodological u sefulness o f t he c eramic a nd c ultural s equence which t he f irst e xcavated s ite o f a r egion
p rovides,
b ut
r ather
t he
s hadow which i t
l ater d iscoveries a nd t heoretical t o i magine t hat S esklo w ill e ver
a djustments . b e t reated a s
e ven i f
i t was
f uture s urveys p rove
number o f
s ites s cattered
l ikely c onsidering l imited
t hat
t hat
o nly
c an t hen c ast o n
I t i s d ifficult i ndeed a n o rdinary s ettlement
o ne
l ink
i n s outh-east Thessaly .
i n a c hain
o f
a
And t his i s v ery
t he s earch f or p rehistoric s ites
i n t he a rea i s
t o t he p lain where t he morpnology o f t he g round f avours t he
f ormation
o f
v isible
" magoulas",
while
i n
t he
h illy
a reas
a d ifferent
p rocess o f t ransformation must h ave r esulted i n a d ifferent t ype o f s ite .
An extensive
e arly
b ronze
a ge
s ite
with
p ossible
n eolithic
d eposits f ound a ccidentally a t t he f oot o f a h ill o utside V olos n ear S esklo
and
Dimini
( Chourmouziades
i s
p .c.
c ompletely c overed a ll R egional
s urveys
very
s ummer
characteristic 1 981);
t he
in
e rosion
that
o f
respect
t he
h ill
h ad
t races o f o ccupation. a nd
s ystematic
e xcavations
f rom
t he
b eginning o f
t he 1 960 's o nwards w ere a imed t o s olve s pecific p roblems c oncerning t he c ultural s equence within a r egion and t o a nswer q uestions a bout t he n ature
o f
c ross
c ultural
r elations .
S ites
l ike
N .
N ikomedeia
( Rodden ,
1 965: 9 5) and S itagroi ( Renfrew, 1 970: 2 98, 1 971: 2 75) i n t he n orth, Achilleion ( Theochares, 1 962: 7 1, G imbutas, 1 971: 2 77) i n Thessaly, F rancthi
i n t he P eloponnese
( Evans,
1 9b4:
i slands
were
i ncluding
1 32) and c hosen
t o
e nvironmental
( Jacobsen,
1 969:
3 43,
S aliagos ( Evans-Renfrew, p rovide a nd
i nformation
s ubsistence
8 7
o f
s tudies
1 976:
1 968)
a more a nd
7 6), Knossos
i n t he
A egean
i nclusive n ature
a lso
t o
i nform
u s
a bout
r egions
c ross
c ultural
which
might
c ontacts .
h ave
p layed a k ey r ole i n t he p rocess
S urveys
o n
t he
o ther
h and
h ave
improved
o f
v ery
much i n methodology a nd e ffectiveness e specially when d ealing with s pecific geographical units ( McDonald - R app, 1 972: 2 66, J acobsen, 1 969:
3 43,
J ameson,
1 969:
3 11,
B intliff,
1 977,
C herry - T orrence,
1 982:
2 4) . I n p arallel, t he t raditional m ethod o f s urveying a nd c lassifying material c ontinued, e nriching c onventional t ypologies a nd r eexaminating l ong e stablished s tylistic a nd c hronological F rench 1 967A , 1 972, S yriopoulos, 1 981, E fstratiou, 1 979).
1 968,
e quations
G rammenos,
( Phelps,
1 975:
1 93,
1 975,
S ampson,
All t he above d ata b oth f rom s ystematic excavations a nd s urveys h ave n ot,
h owever,
l ed
t o a b alanced a nd c omprehensive s ynthesis
material which a voids
o f
s tatistical a pproach o r t he o veremphasis g iven t o c ertain f eatures r egional d ifferentiations and p ottery t ypes. i n
a multi-dimensional
c ultural s equence o f
t he
n eolithic
p eriod
t ypological o bservations while t he a n e mpirical n ature 6 .2.
( Bintliff,
way
s till
1 978),
d efined
i nterpretation i s
1 977:
o f European
( Millisauskas, i s
l ike
A lthough s tudies o f a
wider s cope have d ealt with t he Greek n eolithic a s p art p rehistory
t he
t he o ver-generalized c onclusions o f a p urely
i n
t he
t erms
o f
b ased o n m odels o f
1 17).
P resentation a nd d iscussion o f t he l ate 6 th a nd 5 th m illennia material: I n
t his
material
c hapter
f rom
each
o f
my
o f
t he
t hesis
I w ill t ry t o g ive a n a ccount o f
main
geographical
r egions
o f
t he
t he
Greek
mainland d uring t he l ate 6 th a nd 5 th millennia with r eference t o t he i ntensity
o f
r esearch
c arried
s equence e stablished f or i t. c riteria
which
t echnology a nd t he n ext
i n
t he
r egion
and
t he
c ultural
i nterregional
s ynchronism.
T he
p revailing
s ocial a nd e conomic o rganization w ill b e e xamined i n
s ection.
T he
whole
p hases : o f
p rovide
t he
o ut
S pecial a ttention will b e g iven t o t he
n eolithic
e arly ,
d ivision
middle
have
p eriod
a nd
a lso
o f
l ate
b een
G reece
h as
( Weinberg ,
s uggested
b een
1 942 :
d ivided
1 2 0 .
i nto
O ther
t hree
s ystems
b ased o n t ypical s ites-cultures
( Renfrew, 1 972) o r groups o f p ottery ( French, 1 967A), which, a lthough t hey c an b e u seful methodologically f or s ynthesizing w ork o n a r egional s cale,
have
a reas.
I t
a l imited
s eems
must b e a ttributed l ocal
t he
b een
o f
t hese
a n eed
t o
f act
h as
c ombine e ach o f
when
l ife
o f
t hey a re
W einberg 's
t hat i t
e xist .
p hases
t o
c ultural e lements,
l ong
t o t ne
d ifferentiations
c haracter h as
a pplication
t hat
i s
H owever,
a lways
b een
d ifferent
which h as
extended
f lexible t he
e nough
d efinition
a d ifficult
c hronological,
i ts
o f
t ask ,
a cceptance M ilojcic,
o f
f urther
1 971);
e stablished
a nd
t he
i n a reas
own l imitations .
s ubdivisions m ethod,
t heir
o f k ey i nterest, ( Theochares,
h owever ,
a bility
t o
wider
d ivision t o
a llow
t he
e xact
f or
t here
g eographical T he
o f a more d etailed a pproach i n s ome r egions l ike Thessaly, with r ecent excavations
t o
t ripartite
t ogether
h ave
imposed
6 9,
M ilojcic
1 967:
b y which t hese s ubdivisions
s tand
a s
i ndependent
a nd
r esults
c ultural
t he a nd were
s tages
a re s till o pen t o many q uestions ( Chourmouziades, 1 971B: 1 65) mainly b ecause
t hey
r ely
o n
c eramic
f eatures
s tratigraphical p rovenance.
88
o f
o ccasionally
i nsecure
The
e arly
n eolithic
p eriod
f arming p ractices a nd a n ew a ppearance o nwards,
o f
c ertain
k inds
was
marked
b y
t he
i ntroduction
t echnological and e conomic o rder.
o f
o bjects
s uch a s c eramics,
a fter
i s n o l onger c onsidered a s t he main c riterion f or
( Milisauskas,
1 978:
5 1);
i n
s ome
c ontemporaneity o f p ottery a nd ( Jacobsen,
1 976: 7 6).
t he
s ites
s uch a s
d omestication o f
p lants
m illennium I t
with
( Quitta,
e ra
e ven
i s
t he
d isputed
A lthough t he d ate o f t he i ntroduction o f t hese
f undamental c hanges c annot b e d etermined e xactly, experimented
t he P PN
t he n ew
F rancthi
o f The
i n
G reece
1 967:
i s d ifficult
g radually
f rom
t hey a ppear t o b e
t he
e nd
o f
t he
7 th
2 63).
t o i solate a nd e xamine t he d ifferent s tages o f
s uch a n evolutionary p rocess s ince t he d eposits o f t he P PN p eriod i n Thessaly, t hin .
where t hat p eriod h as b een mainly a ttested, a re g enerally
I n A rgissa ,
l evel
S esklo
a nd
S ouphli,
t he
t hickness
o f
t he
p receramic
i s n ot more t han 0 .80 - 1 m while i n A chilleion a nd G endiki i t i s
e ven l ess,
0 .30 m ( Theochares,
N obody
s eems
t o
d oubt
1 967: t he
7 1).
a ctual
c ultural phase i n G reece ( Weinberg,
e xistence
1 965:
9 );
o f
a p re-ceramic
h owever,
t he
l ack o f
r eliable s tratigraphy a nd t he l imited a rchaeological material c reate p roblems a bout t he exact character o f t he p eriod and i ts p osition within
t he c ontext o f
t he n eolithic s equence ( Nandris,
1 970:
1 92) .
T he
e ffort t o i solate c riteria f or d efining a rchaeologically a c ultural p eriod a nd
t he
o veremphasis
u sually
a ttached
t o
t hem
h as
l ed
t o
a o ne
di mensional approach a t the expense o f a more comprehensive i nterpretation o f e vents which f rom t heir n ature a re c omplex; t his s tarts
a s
a methodological
weakness
b ut
a t
t he
s ame
t ime
a ffects
t he
t heoretical f ramework b ecause i t s eems t o i gnore wider i ssues which have p layed a p rofound r ole i n the v iability o f each n ew c ultural s tage. 6 .2.1.
T he e arly n eolithic p eriod:
The e arly n eolithic p eriod s aw t he emergence o f many s ites a ll o ver Greece ( Theochares, 1 973: 5 7). Most o f t hem were f ounded i n t he f irst h alf o f t he 6 th m illennium, i ncluding t he s ite o f N . N ikomedeia f rom where new r adiocarbon dates a re now a vailable b .c., t he
E N
5 331
e arly
+ 7 4
b .c.)
neolithic
( Fig.
8 5);
s tratum
( ENI
5 830 + 2 70
a s imilar early d ate c omes
( IX)
o f
K nossos
( 5620
+
1 50
f rom b .c.).
U nfortunately v ery f ew
r adiocarbon d ates
o f
t he p eriod a re a vailable s o
f ar
1 19) ;
i s
t he
( Theochares,
s equence mainland areas:
f rom i s N .
1 973 :
S esklo .
p rovided
n oticeable
A g eneral b y
N ikomedeia
f our i n
s ites
t he
s ites
c an
b e
a dded
S esklo
p osition
S aliagos .
T he
which a ppear o f
t he
which e ither
o rientation :
d ifferent
f rom
s ites,
millennium;
a nd
t his
will a nd
s igns
o f c ommunication , e lement
o f
p eriod,
d espite
b asic
N .
c ultural
more
o r t he
b elong
f eatures,
o f
g eographical
Thessaly,
t he
t he
E latea
i n
c oastal z one o r a re
i mportance F rancthi
c eramic
o r
t hroughout
c ommon
d ifferentiation .
89
C 14
t he G reek
b ecause o f
C ave,
S kyros,
t echnological,
t he g eographical d iversification
p ersist
p resence
t o
s pecial
M akri,
d ue t o l ess
i n
t raits
t he g eographical l ocation o f
c ultural
a r eliable
T o t his g eneral o utline a f ew
s ituated o n t he A egean i slands a nd a re o f t heir
o f
r epresenting d ifferent
n orth,
c entral G reece a nd Lerna i n t he s outh . more
l ack
s tratigraphic f ramework f or
H owever ,
t he
whole
a nd
o ccasional
e ach s ite t he
5 th
r emains
r elationship
b etween a g eographical
a rea
a nd
i ts
e cological p arameters a nd
r egional
c ultural d iversity i s n ot a t a ll c lear s ince t he d egree and n ature o f t his
i nteraction
h as '
o nly
( Halstead, 1 981: 3 07).
r ecently
d ensity c an e xpress o ne a spect o f
s ubsistence
c ultural d ue
s trategies
d evelopment
b een
t he
f ocus
o f
a ttention
C ertainly o ccupation p atterns and s ettlement o f
s uch a r elationship,
( Renfrew,
which
t o p hysical b oundaries
c an
b e
1 972:
2 65) .
a ttributed
b etween r egions
t o
u sually
i n t erms
H owever,
i ndependent
t he
o f
l ack
i s d ifficult
c ontacts
t o e xplain .
I t
i s p ossible, f or i nstance a s p opulation g roups p ractising t ranshumance i n c entral Greece have shown, t hat mountains d o not c onstitute a n o bstacle
t o c ommunications;
o n t he c ontrary t hey c an p rovide a n etwork
o f v ital h ighland r outes. In
Thessaly
detailed
d istinguishing many p hases f eatures e arly
( Milojcic
neolithic
( Weinberg,
a nd
M ilojcic,
p eriod,
1 965:
investigations
within t he e arly 1 971) .
d istinguis
T he
,e d
have
p eriod main
b y
succeeded
with
c lear
t hree
Milojcic
p hases
and
in
r egional o f
t he
T heochares
1 9) in most o f t he s ites, a re d ifficult t o s eparate
s tratigraphically ( Chourmouziades,
1 971B :
1 65) ;
e ven more a gonizing i s
t he a ttempt t o e stablish t hem a s c ultural p eriods with a n i nclusive c haracter
( Fig.
h omogeneous l imited
7 7a).
s ince
The
most
s cale ;
t he
b een e xcavated
o nly
o f
mounds
s tratigraphic t he
o f
manner
i s n ot v ery c lear .
T he d epth o f b e
t o
small
h ave
Magoulitsa ,
i n a t rial
o ccurs,
s eems
s ites
sequence
G endiki,
a nd
t he
t he e arly monochrome l evel,
( 0.30
- 0 .50
m )
a l ayer
A chilleion,
o f
o n
e xcept
i n
1 962A :
from a v ery
I -II
h ave
t he l evels where
t he
6 3).
t his
c ase
o f
Tne early
t he early n eolithic I I p hase e ither a ppear a t t he
b eginning o f t he s equence a s f ollow
far
N essonis
s uccession o f
N essonis I where i t i s a lmost 1 m ( Theochares, p ainted p ieces o f
i s
b een e xcavated
monochrome
i n S ouphli and Pyrasos o r, p ottery a s
G entiki a nd N essonis
more o ften,
i n t he c ase o f O tzaki,
I ( Theochares,
1 967:
S esklo,
1 28).
There d oes n ot s eem t o e xist a ny r egional p eculiarity which c an explain t his d ifference. f or
t he
f ollowing
c haracteristics
Exactly t he o pposite, h owever, c an b e s aid
P re-Sesklo i s
b ased
on
p hase just
where such
t he
d istribution o f
a g eographical
t he
main
f actor.
The
a ppearance o f t he i mpressed c eramic t radition which i s e xemplified b y t he B arbotine a nd C ardium wares i s a f eature o f t he n orthern T hessalian s ites l ike O tzaki a nd N essonis I a nd t o a s maller e xtent o f t he w estern r egion where t hey have b een f ound i n Magoulitsa a nd P rodromos ( Chourmouziades,
1 971A:
impressed p ottery i s
1 74).
I n
s outhern
A rgissa a nd A chilleion
( Theochares,
1 967:
1 56,
A lthough t he e xistence o f impressed wares i nevitably
p oints
t o
a c orrelation
n orth a nd e specially o f
t he
a d ifference
b etween
i n
a nd
eastern
Thessaly,
c ompletely u nknown a part f rom o ne s herd e ach f rom
d ate
w ith
t he
F ig.
8 6).
i n t he T hessalian r egion
i mpressed t radition o f
western Y ugoslavian a rea , t he
two
a ssemblages
T ringham ( 1971:
t he
s uggests 1 03);
a
d ifferent c hronology f or t he two t raditions may well b e i ndicated a lthough i t s eems more l ikely t hat t he n orthern T hessalian i mpressed wares c onstitute o ne o f
t he e lements
o f
t he
Macedo-Bulgarian early
n eolithic p hase. I n
a lmost
a ll
o f
t he
s ites,
t he
a l evel o f l ight c oloured p ottery,
90
e arly S esklo p hase
t he B untpolierte
i s p receded
b y
Keramik and t he
c haracteristic
b lack
t opped
p ieces ( Milojcic,
i s a s eparate l evel marking t he and
P re-Sesklo
r eaches e arly
a nd
i t
i s g enerally
1 m ( Theochares,
n eolithic
r epresented .
1 958:
p hase
t o
t he
main
I n
t ransitional
t he
t hin e xcept a t
7 8).
T he
m iddle
s ites
o f
1 959A :1);
u sually t his
p hase b etween P roto-Sesklo S ouphli where
t ransition f rom
n eolithic S esklo
p eriod
a nd
i s
S ouphli
t he
n ot
i t
l atest
v ery
w ell
a s tratigraphic
g ap e xists b etween t he " early p ainted" wares a nd t he t ypical p ainted t radition which p revails i n t he n ext p eriod, t he A 3 s olid s tyle. s ame a ppears o f
" early
t o b e t he s ituation i n O tzaki,
p ainted"
p ottery
i s
i nterrupted
B arbotine a nd C ardium wares ( Milojcic, i s
t he
c an b e
c ase
o f
f ound
The
A chilleion where
(ace-Thompson,
gap
i n
t he
e arly
1 912:
p ainted
b y a f ull
1 959B : F ig.
t radition,
r ange
2 25) .
s tages
1 37,
T he
where t he t hick 3 m d eposit
o f
o f
impressed
T he o nly e xception
t he
T sani
s olid
s tyle
8 3-85).
i f
i t
d oes
exist,
c annot
b e
e xplained b y t he p resence o f i mpressed wares, which i s a ssociated w ith i nvasion t heories. F or t his l atter i s a p henomenon c ommon a lso i n s ites which d id n ot experience s uch an i nterruption . m entioned t he p ossibility o f a l ocal
impressed
Theochares h as
t radition i n s ites
l ike
N essonis I , K ephalovryso , A chilleion ( 1967: 1 56) which e xisted b efore t he a lleged " invasion" o f t he northern impressed wares. The t rial e xcavation o f t he s ite o f A gia Anna ( Megali Vrisi - C hourmouziades, 1 969B: 1 70) in n orth-western Thessaly, a lthough l imited i n s cale, p rovided t hree metres o f d eposit a ssigned t o t he Pre-Sesklo p eriod i ncluding
p ainted
i nvestigations
s herds
c an
o f
p rove
a n e arly
t he
t echnique ;
c ontinuity
o f
h owever,
t he
p ainted
P roto-Sesklo t hrough P re-Sesklo t o middle n eolithic ,
o nly
f urther
t radition
f rom
a c ontinuity which
i s, I think, very l ikely. I n n orthern G reece, t he s ite o f N . N ikomedeia a nd o ccupation o f t he s ettlement o f S ervia ( Ridley-Romiopoulou ,
t he early 1 972: 2 7)
r epresent t he earliest n eolithic c ommunities o f t he a rea;
n o o ther
e arly material h as b een f ound i n G reek Macedonia a nd T hrace,
e xcept
f or
t he v ery r ecent d iscovery o f t he s ite o f T oumba i n t he p lain o f S erres w hich h as e arly K aranovo I p ottery ( Grammenos-Fotiades, 1 980: 1 5). The excavator o f N . N ikomedeia r eports a n e arly n eolithic l ayer which r epresents o ne c ultural p hase a nd i s f ollowed b y a l ate n eolithic s tratum
( Rodden,
1 965:
2 67);
t he
t hickness
o f
t he
d eposit
i n
b oth
C uttings A and B i s 1 .50 m .
P lain and d ecorated wares c onstitute t he
c eramic
e arly
( pink , t he
r epertoire o f
l ight
c oloured
main f eature o f
b rown
b urnished
o utside
t he
p ierced
l ugs
T he O tzaki a re
p ieces
o ccur
p ieces 1 962:
a nd Magoulitsa , b y
a s
i s
t o
A s lip o f d ifferent shades t he
well.
widely
The u sed
l ater
u se
o f
o f
while
o pen b owls
f rom
N ikomedeia t he
t he v essels
w ith
s lip
i nside
t he
t ypical
l ow
r ing
s hows
s imilarities
n orth-western a nd
i s and
early
b ases
a nd
w estern
w ith
t he
s ites
o f
s ince i n b oth a reas t he e arly r ed-on-cream wares
impressed
p ottery ,
B arbotine
p ainted variation which i s p articularly c ulture o ccurs i n e arly N ikomedeia a s well, much
s urface
t he p lain wares while d ark a nd
2 86).
p ottery f rom N .
material k nown
f ollowed
phase.
a pplied
i nclude c losed a nd
( Rodden,
e arly
T hessalian
r ed)
t he majority o f
p ainted
n eolithic s hapes
t he
o r
( A3a - middle n eolithic) .
9 1
I t
a nd
C ardium .
T he
white
c ommon i n t he Karanovo I while i n S esklo i t a ppears
s eems
c ertain
t hat
S ervia
a nd
N .
N ikomedeia,
c onsidered
a s
p erhaps
t he
an e xtension
f ormer o f
t he
more
t han
Thessalian
t he
l atter,
culture
c an
north
b e
o f
t he
O lympos- O ssa-Kissavos mountains i nto t he p lains o f Macedonia . t hese c ontacts c an b e explained i n c ultural t erms i s d ifficult t o
H ow s ay .
H owever, i t i s, I think, c ertain t hat t he a doption o f s chemes s uch a s t he
" Thessalo-Macedonian
i solated f eatures
a s
P rehistoric
k oine"
t ends
c ultural s igns
E latea
n eolithic d eposit i n excavations i n t he
p rovides
c entral r egion
a ttempted and
1 968).
t he
a ims
u s
with
careful
F rench,
c lassification
methodological
Elatea,
o verestimate
t he
b asing
m ;
t he
v alidity
o f
4 7).
o nly
s ecure
o f
t he
s tratigraphic
h imself
material
( 1972).
I n
t he
a ctual
o n
w ith
t hree
which c overed a c onsiderable a rea,
r eached 3 - 3 .50
t he
1 973:
e arly
G reece ( Weinberg , 1 962: 1 58) s ince o lder a t s ites l ike Chaeronea, Ag. Marina,
0r ch o m enos , Li anokl ad i lack ( Syriopoulos,
t o
( Theochares,
i ndications
p ottery
c lear
g roups,
c hronological
t renches
o pened
a t
t he d epth o f t he d eposit
e arly n eolithic
l ayer
i s
1 m d eep .
I t
i s important t o n ote t hat Elatea i s t he o nly s ite i n Greece where t he e arly monochrome l evel h as b een a ttested s tratigraphically a nd p ainted s herds
a re
a bsent .
F rom
t he
v ery
o f s hades o n t he surface o f t ones,
which a ppear
t echniques, T he
o f
with
t he
a nd
a s
C orinth,
L erna
t o
s eem
l ikely
o f
t he
c ommon
A sea
a re a nd
i n t he
f rom
E latea
c oncentrated t he
s ince
i t
i s
a re
p ieces
w hich
c an
c an
t he
( a)
t he
h ardly b e
c onfined mainly t o c oarse
4 87) .
a lways
o f
f iring
a round
d ecoration:
s outhern G reece
1 937:
a v ariety
t he l ighter
1 68).
which i n many c ases
( Weinberg,
a f ew
p ottery
t hroughout
c lay d ifferences t hat
t he
s hapes
c riterion
b e
a nd
b ased l argely o n d oes
t o i mprovements
r egions,
t he f abric,
a u seful
s eems
o ther
f abric,
s pongy a ppearance o f c onsidered
t he u pper l evels,
c haracteristics
c ontacts
appearance
wares
W einberg n otes
s omething w hich s eems v ery l ikely ( 1962:
s pecial
i ndicate
i n
b eginning,
t he v ases a nd h e a ttributes
i n s ites
A lthough
d ifficult
p olychrome
l ike
d istinctions
t o e stablish
p ottery
i t
with a l ight
c oloured s urface and s ometimes c overed with white s lip ( Theochares, 1 973: 5 7), a re imported f rom C orinth . I ndeed, i n t he c ase o f r eal P eloponnesian b etween
t he
i mports,
t wo
a s
r egions
I t hink
i s
s hapes a nd c eramic f eatures t o
s how a t ypological
c hronological
t erms
t hese
p ossible .
a round
which
t he
a c hronological
p resence o f
l ike b owls a nd
s imilarity
t o
a re,
T he
l ugs c an
middle
i n b e
o f
S ome n eolithic
o ther
s ites
material
b ut
t herefore v ery d ifficult s ame
p eriod .
1 912)
A t
H alae
a nd O rchomenos
f rom
c entral
Greece
t he
two
t he
6 th
( Goldman ,
( Kunze,
1 940 :
1 931),
3 81),
p rovide
t ends r ough
millennium.
u s
with 7 71) .
l ater p hases
C haeronea
n o d istinction
t he monochrome a nd t he e arly p ainted p hase;
i n
f ew.
w ithout s tratigraphical o rder ( Fig . t o s eparate e arlier o r
a reas
t ranslated
U nfortunately t he a vailable r adiocarbon d ates a re
r elation
c ertain t ypes o f
c an
early I t
i s
w ithin t he
( Wace-Thompson , b e
made
b etween
a r eexamination o f t he
s tratigraphy i s n ecessary. T he
a ppearance
b y t he e xcavator a s phase
t rom
s uggests o f
t he
o f
" early
t he ' most
f irst'
p ainted"
p ieces
s ignificant
( Weinberg,
1 962:
1 75).
f or t hem s omething c loser t o a middle
t heir more d eveloped d ecoration ( 1967:
92
i n
E latea
i s
f eature s eparating
1 42).
c onsidered t he
Theochares
n eolithic I ndeed,
d ate,
s econd
r ightly b ecause
t heir r elation
t o t he e arly p ainted sherds o f P eloponnesos ( red-on-buff, l ate e arly n eolithic) a nd
t he r ed-on-white ware
o f
C haeronea ,
which
i s
c onsidered
a s b elonging t o t he t ransitional p hase b etween early a nd middle, s till u nclear . s econd
I f
p hase ,
t he
e arly
i n v iew o f
t he f act
w ith r ed-on-white p ainted c hronological
p ainted
s herds
t hat
ware,
f rom
s ome
t hen
E latea
b elong
t o
i s t he
p ieces w ere f ound t ogether
t he
s upposed
s ynchronism w ith t he P eloponnese
i s
e arly n eolithic
s haken.
The n eolithic c ultural s equence i n the P eloponnese, a lthough i t h as
r ecently
b een c larified
o n o ld e xcavations
b y
t he
w ork o f
P helps
c oncentrated a round a f ew
( 1975),
s ites
s till
r elies
i n t he n orth-eastern
r egion. Lerna n eolithic 1 958:
i n
t he
A rgolid
s tratigraphy
1 25).
i s
The monochrome
p ainted s herds o f t he f irst l ayer
with f ine
p rehistoric ( Weinberg,
which
s uccessive
ware,
l ayers,
r ainbow,
g lazed
p ieces,
p rovides
a n e arly
2 i n t hick ( Caskey,
variegated and v ery f ew
l ayer a re f ollowed
r ed-slipped,
p ainted s herds.
a s ettlement
w ith many
b y a well s eparated n ext
n eolithic U rfirnis a nd
many
The s ite a t C orinth a lso r evealed l arge d eposits o f
material,
1 937:
3 87,
mainly
o f
e arly
and
Walker - K osmopoulos,
middle
1 948) .
n eolithic
D espite
t he
d ate
c areful
e xamination o f t he s tratigraphic s equence i n t he f our t renches, e arlier n eolithic
l ayers
T rench 3 where, h owever, n eolithic
p ottery ,
c ould
ware .
b e
s eparated
except
r ed-slipped
a nd
T he a ccumulation o f
c ontinued i n t he l evel a bove
p ainted
was
t he
p erhaps
t he d eposit was o nly one metre d eep.
v ariegated,
w ith T hessalian A l
n ot
i n
Early
f ound
mixed
m ixed n eolithic d eposits
where p lain n eolithic U rfirnis
s herds
w ere
f ound t ogether with l ate n eolithic varieties.
H owever, d espite t he
l ack o f
c lassification o f
t hick d eposits
p ottery,
a s t ar a s
f or
t he
e arly
p eriod,
t he
i ts g eneral c haracteristics a re
c oncerned,
t he
i s e asy.
The e arly material o f t he F rancthi C ave i s t ypical o f t he f irst n eolithic p eriod i n t he P eloponnese ( Jacobsen, 1 969: 3 62). T he material i s not p lentiful s ince t he p it F /F-1, 3 x 6 .50 i n i s t he o nly o ne where t he e arly n eolithic r epresents t he e arly p eriod
was a ttested . i s v ery t hin
s ucceeding s tages, t he p ottery r emains c ommonest ware i s t he b urnished monochrome f rom
b uff
t o
b lack .
B y
t he
e nd
o f
t he
A lthough t he l evel which i n c omparison with t he
a re c haracteristic. The where t he s urface may v ary p hase
a s mall
q uantity
o f
p ainted s herds a ppear with the p aint a pplied o n t he surface without s lip. H owever, J acobsen n otes t hat t he character o f t his p ainted v ariation i s not c lear a nd t hus t he t ransitional p hases d ifferent
c ultural
b etween t he
l evels a re n ot v ery w ell e stablished.
T hanks t o t he s ecure s tratigraphic s equence o f Lerna we have a fair
amount
o f
c haracteristics c eramic a t
f eatures
Corinth
evidence
o f
f or
e arliest
f rom L erna
and
i solated,
T here
a re
the
character
p hase
i n
r eappear
i n
F rancthi.
s tratigraphically r epertoire .
t he
t he
Monochrome
c onstitutes
c onflicting
and
t he
s outhern G reece .
t he
o pinions
t wo
o ther
a s
t o
s ites
although
w are t he
t ypical
mentioned
pottery, b asic
general
T he
o f
t he
e xact
not
c eramic
c haracter
o f t he m onochrome ware . W einberg makes a s light d istinction b etween r ed monochrome a nd v ariegated wares i n C orinth ( 1937) while C askey i n L erna
mentions
a
monochrome
ware
v ariegated c lass o f p ottery ( Blegen,
9 3
a nd
a d istinctive
1 932: 6 61, Kunze,
r ainbow
1 931:
1 1,
o r 2 6).
I t
i s
o n
l ikely,
t he
v ariegated t hat
a s T heochares h as s uggested ( 1973:
s urface r esult
many o f
c riteria
i ndicates
t o
must
b e
improved
c onsidered
t he d ifferent
t erminologies a rise f rom
d escribe
s ame
t he
s ubstantiated i n
ware,
e vidence most
f rom
o f
t he
s cale o f
s tratigraphically.
t he
P eloponnese o ther
s ites
a re
a f actor
s tylistic
t o
t he
t one
while
u se i s
I t
t he
s eems
o f v arying
r elevant
t o
t reatment c an b e
h omogeneous,
t he n orth-east
f rom
( Weinberg,
g rounds,
t he
which
t he s urface
b e
f rom
k nown o nly
i nvestigations
O n
a part
t he r ed
N evertheless t he early n eolithic
s eems
a reas,
t hat
t echniques
a s a l ater d evelopment .
whether o r n ot t hese s light d ifferences o f p eriod
6 7),
f iring
s urface
1 965,
p eriod
f inds
a lthough
r egion ,
o r
i s
f rom
t he p oor ;
a l imited
m ap 1 ).
c an
b e
d ivided
i nto
t wo
p hases:
an early one with p redominantly monochrome p ottery a nd a l ater o ne which o f
i s
marked
b y
t he
a ppearance
o f
t he v ariegated
a nd
C orinth with a l imited n umber o f p ainted p ieces .
t hese
p ainted
s herds
a lthough i t
s eems
jars,
t hey
t hat
c hronolgy
o f
should
t he
t he F rancthi
with
t he
more l ikely , p eriod
C ave:
b e i s
C haeronea
t he
wares
T hessalian
A 3b
wares
j udging f rom t he o pen b owls a nd g lobular
a scribed b ased
5 754 + 8 1
a nd
r ainbow
W einberg c ompares
t o
a t ransitional
o n a s eries o f
b .c.
f or
t he
phase.
The
r adiocarbon d ates
b eginning
and
f rom
5 244 + 1 12
b .c. f or t he end o f t he e arly n eolithic p eriod ( Fig. 8 5). The early neolithic p eriod i s r epresented i n t he Aegean i slands and
t he
S kyros,
c oastal A gios
a rea
P etros
o f
mainland G reece
a nd N .
Makri .
b asically
M ore n eolithic
b y
t he s ites
s ites
were
o f
r eported
r ecently f rom t he C yclades a lthough t heir c haracter i s n ot well e stablished ( Cherry - T orrence, 1 982: 2 4). C oastal e arly n eolithic s ites
w ere
n ot
f ound
g eomorphology o f 3 3,
S ampson,
i n E uboea which
i s
n ot
s urprising
i n v iew
o f
t he i sland e specially i ts e astern s ide ( Sackett,
1 974:
5 ,
t he
1 966:
1 981).
T he n eolithic d eposit
i n t he s ite P apa t o C homa i n S kyros,
i s 0 .50
- 8 0 m t hick and c overs, a ccording t o Theochares, o ne c ultural phase without a ny i nterruption ( 1959B : 2 79) . A lthough t he t rial e xcavation g ave n o more i s p robable . variety
o f
t han a f ew h undred s herds, T he p rimitive a ppearance shades
h emispherical
and
b owls
p ainted s herd was a pplied
d irectly
u sually
a nd
o pen
t he e arly d ate o f t he m aterial o f t he monochrome ware w ith a
p olished,
p hiale
t ogether
p oint i n
f ound i n t he u pper l evels
t o
t he
s urface .
I t
i s
a n
with
s hapes
t hat d irection ;
o f
o nly o ne
with l inear d ecoration
i mportant
s ite
a nd
f urther
e xcavations a re n ecessary. The
c oastal
T heochares
i n
t hick ( 1956: monochrome i ncised
s ite
1 954, 1 ).
T he
p ottery
p ottery
o f
N .
Makri
n ear
t wo e arly l ayers
u sually and
t he
p olished, s econd
b y
t he
ware .
r einforced
t he a rchitectural r emains .
b y
t hat
t he
monochrome
v ariegated
p ieces
s eparate.
T he
Thessalian
A 2
( Theochares,
Moreover ,
a nd
t hus
i ncised and
1 954:
f or
i s
a f oreign
i ts
i n N .
o f
b y
c annot
b e
t he
r ed b een
h as
Makri,
i t
r ainbow c onsidered
t ype
b y a nd
h as
t he p ottery, with
a d ifferent i nfluence
wares
t wo p hases
r egards
p hase
a ppearance
9 4
t he
t ogether
o f
t he f irst,
v ariegated
i ntroduction
A s
o ccur
a m onochrome
p ottery
a lthough 1 14)
o r
t he p resence o f
wares
e xcavated
i n s ome c ases 3 m
a re c haracterized, r ainbow
monochrome A l c lear
Marathon,
r evealed d eep n eolithic d eposits,
f rom
i s a nd a s t he
b een s uggested a l ocal
o rigin
f or t he s tyle i s more p robable. The i ncised t echnique was a lready k nown i n s ites l ike N emea a nd K nossos a nd t he employment o f t he l inear motifs
will
l ater
( Chaeronea).
b ecome
a p redominant
P articularly i mportant
b etween e arly
a nd
i s
m iddle n eolithic .
f eature
i n
t he c haracter
c entral Greece
o f
T he a ppearance o f
t he
t ransition
t he A l
ware a nd
p ainted sherds in N . Makri i s s imilar t o t he b eginning o f t he middle n eolithic A 3 w ares 6 .2.2.
p eriod
i n T hessaly
( Wace-Thompson,
w ith
1 912:
i ts
f ine
r ed
p ottery a nd
t he A 3b a nd
1 4).
T he m iddle n eolithic p eriod:
The
t ransition f rom e arly t o m iddle n eolithic was g radual a ll o ver
G reece.
The
r elative
d istinctions
i n
t he
uniformity,
e arly
p eriod
Thessalian
p lain
o r
rather
p ersisted
s ites
i n t he
1 977:
2 3) while a n a lleged i ncrease
t he
i nto
c ontinued
t o
l ack
t he
b e
o f
n ext.
c lear-cut
M ost
i nhabited
i n p opulation h as n ot
o f
t he
( Halstead,
b een a ttested
a rchaeologically ( Theochares, 1 973 : 6 5) . W e c an s ee a s a n ew e lement t he widespread u se o f p ainted p ottery which emerged f rom l ocal c eramic s tyles such a s t he s olid and l inear wares o f Thessaly . S ome o f t hese s tylistic d ifferentiations h ave b een c redited with a c hronological s ignificance a lthough t he s uch d istinctions I n
p oor
s tratigraphy
i n most
o f
t he
s ites
i nsufficiently d ocumented ( Wace-Thompson ,
Thessaly,
a lthough
t he
material
a ttributed
l eave
1 912).
t o
t he
middle
n eolithic i s a bundant o ur a ctual k nowledge o f
t he p eriod i s r egrettably
t o a l arge extent
i n S esklo,
s ite o f
p oor;
i n T hessaly,
t he
i t
t he
o nly
and
t he
a cropolis
i s
t ypical
p hase
which
s ettlement
t hat i s
well
i s
phase
t he d ominant
d ocumented I II
i n
which
t he
a rea
marks
t he
d estruction l evel o f t he s ite . A lthough t he o ld material o f S esklo h as b een d iscussed i n d etail b y T sountas ( 1908), t he r esults o f t he r ecent e xcavations 1 969,
i n
1 971,
c ulture
t he
s ite h ave
1 972,
i n
1 973,
r elation
t o
t he
c onsistently exaggerated. s ettlement b ut o f
a lso
a nd
b ecause
Thessaly
a lways
t he
b een
n umber
t he
n ever
t o
i solate
a nd
Z erelia
t radition T he e arly
r egional
The
n eolithic
i ts
i nhabitants
b een
b etween
t horoughly
( Theochares,
r ole
p eriod
s ome t ry
h ave
s ites
particular
o f i s,
f rom
a spect
t he
1 968, S esklo
I b elieve,
t he s ize o f
b een
examined.
d ifferent The
o f
t he
o verestimated p arts
a ttempt t he
h as
c ulture,
t o e stablish d istribution p atterns
c larified
t he
o rigin a nd
their r elation t o
( Wace-Thompson,
n eolithic,
middle
p ublished
1 976).
b ased
And i n t hat r espect t he excavations a t T sani,
h ave
l ocal s tyles and
b een
This i s n ot o nly b ecause o f
p referably t he p ottery a nd
s ome
y et 1 975,
i nterrelations
h ave
o n s tylistic g rounds. T sangli
n ot
1 974,
t he
t he
t ypical
r ole
o f
S esklo
a t
l east
p ainted
1 912).
d ifferences p ersist
i n
t he
well
c eramic
i nto
t he
t radition which a ppear n ext
p eriod,
t his
i n
t ime
especially in s outhern Thessaly and c entral Greece. P revious d ifferences b ased o n d istinctive p ottery s uch a s t he i mpressed wares will
g ive
way
t o
p ainted t radition , 1 912:
t he
p revailing
a nd mainly t he A 3b r ed-on-cream ware ( Wace-Thompson,
1 4). The A l
t he
t he l ocal s tyles a nd variations o f
monochrome r ed ware i s v ery c ommon a t S esklo a nd most o f
Thessalian
G endiki
s ites
( Theochares,
such a s 1 973,
T sangli,
F ig.
95
5 0)
T sani,
while
t he
S ouphli, t ypical
Z erelia A3b
and
painted
p ottery
i s
b y
t ar
t he
c ommonest
ware
e lsewhere.
Unfortunately
s tratigraphic o bservations i n most o f t he s ites which were e xcavated a t t he
b eginning
l sangli and r oughly
o f
t he
t he
C entury
t hree
s imilar
t o
a re
n ot
s ecure:
l evels o f T sani,
t hat
o f
S esklo,
d o
t he
e ight
s trata
o f
a lthough p roviding
material
n ot
c ultural
p ermit
p recise
c omparisons e ither w ith e astern T hessaly o r c entral G reece. I n
c entral
Greece
t he
middle
n eolithic
p eriod
i s
r epresented
mainly b y t he r ecently r eexcavated s ite o f E latea ( Weinberg, while
C haeronea
a nd L ianokladi
b oth r ich i n p ottery r emains, T he p ottery
r eliable
c eramic
t radition
( Wace-Thompson ,
1 97,
1 962 :
1 71),
1 58)
t hough
l ack g ood s tratigraphy.
s equence
b etween
1 912:
t he
o f
E latea
e arly
s hows
and
a c ontinuity i n t he
middle
phases
with
t he
monochrome wares s till p redominant a nd t he e arliest p ainted p ieces ( red-on-brown or b uff surface) marking t he t ransition t o t he s econd p hase .
T he
s econd
" Bothros
p hase"
i s
c haracterized
b y
U rfirnis
s herds
k nown f rom s outhern G reece which a ppear a fter t he end o f t he t ypical C haeronea ware, a lthough a ccording t o Weinberg t he Peloponnesian e xamples
b elong
t o
t he b eginning o f
t he m iddle
p eriod
while
i n c entral
G reece t hey mark t he e nd o f i t ( 1962: 1 58). F rench, h owever, p ostulates many o f t he " Bothros p hase" c haracteristics such a s t he i ncurved ( 1972:
r im
b owl
i n
t he
r epertoire
o f
t he
s ucceeding D rachmani
p hase
8 ).
The importance o f t he s ites o f C haeronea a nd L ianokladi l ies i n t heir d istinctive p ottery. only 0 .80 i n t hick, material t he
w ith
t he
h as
t ypical
c haracteristic
T he l ower p art o f t he Chaeronea d eposit,
p rovided mixed n eolithic a nd early h elladic
f ine
r ed-on-white
p olished
A 3b
b lack
wares
ware
A 5
f ound
t ogether
( Wace-Thompson,
with 1 912) ;
t he excavators b elieve t hat t he C haeronea variety o f t he A 3b p ainted c ategory must i n
t he
b e a ttributed t o l ocal p ottery w orkshops which f lourished
wider v icinity o f
t he
s outh-eastern
T hessalian
c ultural
r egion .
The c ase o f L ianokladi, i n t he S pherheios v alley, i s a lmost t he s ame. T he
t ypical
o f
t he
p ainted
d eepest
L ianokladi
s tratum
A 3S ware
where
i t
i s
t he
o ccurs
c haracteristic
with
t he
S esklo
p ottery A 3b
a nd
b oth
t he
C haeronea w ares. I t
i s
important
t o
emphasize
t he
l ocal
character
o f
C haeronea and L ianokladi wares which are c onsidered a s i ndependent d evelopments o f t he r ed p atterned c eramic t radition which i s c ommon a ll o ver Greece ( French, 1 972: 7 ). r epresenting t he d evelopment o f
S ince any s tratigraphic s equence t he p ainted wares i s d ifficult t o
e stablish i n c entral G reece o nly t heir d istribution o ffers c hronological r eference
( Wace-Thompson,
s ome k ind o f
1 912).
3 81),
T he e vidence f rom O rchomenos ( Kunze, 1 931), H alae ( Goldman , 1 940 : Ag. Marina ( Soteriades, 1 911: 2 05), Pyrgos ( Bulle, 1 907), t he
C ave
o f
P an
i n
Marathon
( Papademetriou,
1 958 :
1 5),
a nd
t he
K itsos
C ave
i n A ttica ( Lambert, 1 981: 1 01) i s l ess r eliable ; i t i s n oteworthy t hat only eighteen vases a re r eported f rom t he n eolithic d eposit o f Halae u nder t he h istorical r emains o f
t he a ncient
p ainted p ieces
with
t he
monochrome
o f
O nly
t he
C ave
t he
s ites .
d eposit
r evealed
material
o f
a cropolis.
p ottery a re
P an w ith i ts
c losely
96
r elated
t he
T he
main
t ypical A 3b
f inds
i n
most
t hree metres o f n eolithic t o
t he
r epertoire
f rom
C haeronea a nd O rchomenos. A t L erna s tratigraphic
i n P elopönnesos, C askey a ppears t o b e c ertain o f d istinction b etween e arly a nd m iddle n eolithic :
metre d eposit
w ith e ight
( 1959 :
a c lear a t wo
b uilding l evels c onstitutes t he s econd s tratum
2 02) where r ed s lipped,
g lazed wares a nd s ome p ainted p ieces a re
c ommon.
m ixed
The o ld e xcavations i n C orinth ( Weinberg, 1 937) with i ts t hree d eposits o f n eolithic material o ffer a d oubtful s tratigraphical
o rder .
H owever, a f ew p oints must b e emphasized:
t he t renches i t was d ifficult
( a) in a ll f our o f
f or a p ure middle n eolithic d eposit
t o b e
i solated s tratigraphically, except p erhaps i n t he c ase o f t he f ourth t rench ,
mainly
b ecause
o f
t he
p resence
o f
e arlier
material,
( b)
c lear
s tratigraphic d istinction b etween t he e arly a nd middle p hase i s n ot j ustifiable i n C orinth s ince t here i s ag radual e volution o f p ottery s hapes a nd wares : t he r ed
a n i ncreased v ariety o f
b owls, a nd b etter f iring
f or
s lipped p ottery w hich r esulted i n a h omogeneous s urface c olour.
F rancthi C ave i n t he Argolid p lain g ave a g reat d eal o f middle n eolithic p ottery a nd a s ecure s tratigraphic s equence,
d espite
t he f act
t hat t he b ulk o f t he material c omes f rom o ne p it ( Jacobsen , 1 969: 3 43) . T he e arly s pongy m onochrome wares c ontinue t o b e r eproduced a s i n t he c ase o f C orinth while t here i s n o c hange i n t he r epertoire o f shapes e xcept o f t he t ypical Urfirnis ' fruitstand ' h igh
c onical
s tand
( 1969,
F ig.
6 :2).
The
with t he characteristic p atterned
ware
g radually
s ucceeds t he e arly n eolithic s pongy p attern ware while b y t he middle o f t he p eriod U rfirnis p ottery i s a bundant; U rfirnis,
t he v ariation o f b urnished
a c ombination o f b urnishing t echnique a nd U rfirnis p aint mark
t he e nd o f
t he p eriod
( Vitelli,
1 974).
The e vidence f rom t he o ther P eloponnesian s ites, a s f ar a s t he c haracter o f t he m iddle n eolithic i s c oncerned, i s s canty . Most o f t he excavations a re q uite o ld a nd with n o s ecure s tratigraphic s equence. I n a ddition t o t hat, t he e xcavators a dopt t heir own t erminology f or t he pottery,
s o mething
u nderstanding o f
which
greatly
hindered
the
comprehensive
t he P eloponnesian m aterial.
I n P rosymna, o nly a small a nd i solated n eolithic d eposit ( 0.20 1 .10 m t hick) i s r eported b y B legen ( 1937). A s f ar a s t he p ottery i s c oncerned, B legen 's e arlier a nd l ater s tyle c orrespond t o t he middle a nd
l ate n eolithic p eriods
p ottery
o f
t he
s lipped
t o
r ed t he
A l
p atterned o n-red O f
t he
e arly
s tyle
wares
f ound
Thessalian
ware
d o
n ot
s outhern Greece;
i n
i ts
t o
b e
t he r ed monochrome
c haracteristic g laze i s
C orinth a nd
c eramics. s eem
F rancthi
Moreover, d ifferent
t he
f rom
t he
a nd
i t
r elated i s
varieties T hessalian
t o
s imilar o f
t he
white-
p ottery A 3a. t he
t wenty-two
p its
n eolithic material ( 0.50 f rom t he p atterned ware c oarse
o f
with
p ottery a ppeared.
o pened i n G onia o nly f our p rovided u s w ith
- 2 .50 m thick) ( Blegen, 1 931: 5 5). Apart ( red-on-white o r b uff g round), an i ncised The
i ncised
t echnique
i s
not
unknown
i n
Peloponnesos, e specially i n t he western p art, where t his p articular p ottery i s v ery d istinctive ( Malthi - A driatic ware) while i ts p resence i n t he e astern r egions i s
l ess
c ommon ( Gonia,
9 7
N emea,
P rosymna,
A sea).
I n A giorgitika ( Biegen, 1 928: 5 33), N emea ( Biegen, 1 925: 1 75), A sea ( Holmberg, 1 944) a nd Malthi ( Valmin, 1 938) t he c eramic s equence includes r ed monochrome A la, there i s,
h owever,
r ed s lipped A lb a nd p ainted wares A 3b;
a g reat d eal o f
c onfusion about
t he
t erminology
u sed. N evertheless
c ertain
p oints
c an
b e
m ade
r egarding
t he
p icture o f t he middle n eolithic p eriod i n P eloponnesos:
p revailing ( a) c eramic
r emains a ppear i n much g reater q uantity t han i n t he p revious p eriod. A part
f rom t he
p onnesos,
s tratified
d eposits
o f
t he
s ites
o f
n orth-eastern P elo-
t he c ontribution o f t he r est o f t he material i s l imited t o
s tylistic e vidence ;
t hat
t ors were
t o d istinguish c hronological
c ultural
r eluctant
p eriods
t echnique
s eems
e volved o ut o f a s
h as
b een
t o
h ave
r eason why
A sea ,
a w ide
i n
N emea ,
s ome
e xcava-
( b)
t he
U rfirnis
1 958:
t hat
a ny o utside
2 25) .
T he
i t
e lement
c haracter-
i n u se o n t he s pongy ware o f t he p revious p eriod ;
t he o pen b owl a nd
t ypical U rfirnis
t he h igh c onical
f ruitstand
i s
n ot
s tand,
which
c ompletely n ew
the b owl c ontinues a l ong t radition o f o pen s hapes. i stics a re c ommon has b een r ightly
t he
u se a nd a ll t he i ndications a re
( Perkins - Weinberg,
was
c ombination o f
c ases
s tages a nd d efine
G onia),
t he e arly c eramic t radition w ithout
s uggested
c onstitute t he
t he
( Agiorgitika ,
i stic g laze p aint the
i s
s ince
B oth c haracter-
i n T hessaly f rom q uite e arly ( Theochares, 1 967) . A s s uggested b y Theochares ( 1973: 7 7) U rfirnis i s a
t echnique which c annot
b e
t ranslated
i nto
c hronological
t erms
a nd
d oes
n ot b ear a ny c ultural i mplications . H owever , t he d ifferent t ime o f i ts a ppearance i n n orth-eastern P eloponnesos and c entral Greece p oints t owards a r elation b etween t he p lace o f o rigin a nd t he a rea o f d iffu sion . E latea
I f such a r elation exists, t he p resence o f Urfirnis p ieces i n ( Weinberg,
1 962)
c annot
b e
a ccepted
a s
c hronological c omparison b etween t heir m iddle two
a reas
( except
i n
t he
c ase
o f
t he
r eliable
e vidence
n eolithic
p eriods
imported
p ieces),
f or o f
( c)
a
t he t he
apparent l ack o f uniform p attern o f d evelopments b etween t he n ortheastern a nd s outh-western p arts o f P eloponnesos i s o pen t o q uestion. I t
s eems
there
a re
t hat n o
t he
e astern
o bvious
r egion
was
e nvironmental
more
t hickly
r easons
f or
p opulated t hat,
a lthough
( d) a g eneral
c onservatism i n t he d evelopment o f t he p ottery a nd a p ersistence o f o ld 6 .3.
c eramic
t he
t radition i s n oticeable a ll o ver P eloponnesos .
P ottery g roups a nd i nterregional r elationships: P ottery groups b ased mainly o n e xcavation o f k ey s ites a nd t o a
l esser e xtent o n s urvey material, c hronological c omparison b etween
p rovide a f ramework o f s tylistic a nd d ifferent a reas . I t i s p ossible, a s
F rench has s uggested ( 1970:
1 2) t hat
o nly
b ut
g eographical
p arameters
a lso
p ottery d istributions have not i nvolve
e conomic
a nd
e cological
wares w ere t he e arliest f ound i n G reece;
t hey w ere
f actors. I .
T he monochrome
c ommon
d uring
t he
e arly
n eolithic
p hase
a ll
o ver
t he
G reek
mainland,
e stablishing a s tylistic uniformity a nd c ertainly b etraying a r ough c ontemporaneity . phase
a s
N evertheless
r epresenting
convincing
not
only
s tratigraphically monochrome
p ottery
t he
a c ultural b ecause
( Fig. has
7 7a)
i nterpretation o f p eriod
such b ut
98
a phase
a lso
experienced
i n
cannot
b ecause
many
t he
a bsolute
l ocal
monochrome
t erms be
i s
n ot
i solated
s tylistically variations
t he
whose
c hronological
o rder
i s n oticeable t hat s hade a nd
i n
a nd t ime ;
t hat
i s
d ifficult
t o
e stablish ( Fig .
7 7b).
M oreover ,
t he t erm mochrome d oes n ot s pecify t he c olour o f r espect
t he
t erm c an h ave a w ide a pplication i n s tyle
i ndeed m onochrome wares o f d ifferent s hades h ave
t hroughout
t he
n eolithic
i t t he
p eriod,
i n
b een i n u se
p arallel with d ecorated p ottery .
Thus t he t erm ' monochrome k oine' i n t he G reek n eolithic ( Theochares, 1 967) would mean n othing more t han a s et o f c eramic c haracteristics w ith a w idespread d istribution. A group
o f
c onsiderable s ome
monochrome
u niformity,
Thessalian
n eolithic
s ites,
l evel ;
t hey
wares
s tylistic where
which
a nd
t hey
c onstitute
i s
u sually
t he
characterized
c hronological, o nly
c an
f ollow
c eramic
t he
b e
by
f ound
a i n
p re-pottery
f eature
o f
t he
s o-
c alled F rühkeramikum p hase ( Milo giC , 1 959A , 7 ) which was i solated i n s ites l ike A rgissa ( Miloj nd ' - B oessneck - Hopf, 1 962) a nd S ouphli ( Theochares,
1 958 :
7 8) while i n S esklo
f ound o nly i n s ome p laces i n t he small
s pherical
v ase
w ithout
t his e arly n eolithic I p hase was
s ettlement .
a b ase
a nd
i s very characteristic ( Theochares,
T he
u sually
1 967:
p rimitiveness w ith
1 06,
o f
s uspension
t he
h oles
F ig. 5 6) a nd h as
b een
s een a s a r esult o f t he imitation o f wooden a nd b asketry p rototypes. S ubdivisions within t he e arly monochrome r epertoire ( Achilleion p hase) base
based
on
stylistic
changes
rather
than
s tratigraphical
o bservations a nd a s s uch t hey a re o ften m isleading. S ince t he c eramic f eatures which d efine t he e arly monochrome p ottery d o n ot c hange d rastically o r d isappear i n t he s ucceeding wares, the s tratigraphical f actor b ecomes a n e ssential c riterion . r espect
a purely monochrome
s tratum
i s
d ifficult
t o
I n t hat
f ind
i n
s ites
o utside Thessaly b ecause i t l ooks c ertain t hat t he characteristic p ottery o f t he e arliest l evels i n c entral G reek a nd P eloponnesian s ites i s
q uite
d ifferent
( Fig .
7 7);
a lthough monochrome
p ieces
d o
o ccur,
b y
f ar t he m ost r epresentative p ottery o f L erna ( Lerna I ) i s t he r ainbow ware ( Caskey, 1 958: 1 25), i n E latea t he P lain b urnished ( Weinberg, 1 962:
1 58) while i n N . N ikomedeia t he impressed wares ( Rodden,
1 964:
5 64). I t
s eems
s ubstantiated r egional
t hat
i f
a p ersistence
i n T hessaly,
u se
o f
n umber
which o f
i s
e arly
o f
v ery
monochrome
l ikely ,
p ottery
i t
wares
would
c an
mean
characteristics
b e
more
l ike
a
t he
h emispherical b owl a nd p ierced l ugs which h ad a widespread d istribution a ll
o ver
G reece,
t han
a
d istinctive
c eramic
g roup.
C ertainly
monochrome wares d o b etray a t echnological s tage i n p ottery manufacture which,
h owever,
i s
n ot
l imited
t o
o r
d efined
b y
o nly
t he
s urface
t reatment. I I.
Another
n eolithic
d istinctive
p eriod
i s
t he
p ottery
s o-called
group b lack
o f
t he
t opped
e arly
ware .
s tages
o f
t he
A lthough
i t
was
f irst n oticed i n Thessaly ( Otzaki 1 955: 1 77) and was a ttributed t o t he P roto-Sesklo p hase, r ecent e xcavations i n o ther p arts o f
Greece
i ndicate
a wider d istribution a nd
t he e xistence o f
l ocal
variations ( e.g. S itagroi) with c lear chronological r eferences ( Fig. 7 8).
T here
G reece
t he
Weinberg,
a re
a lso
same 1 962:
p ottery ( 1972:
t erminological
ware
h as
b een
p roblems. c alled
I n
c entral
variegated
a nd
( e.g.
s outhern E latea
-
1 67) while F rench p refers t o c all i t c reamy c oloured 5 );
t he d ifference a lso b etween t he r ainbow ware o f
99
P eloponnesos a nd P roto-Sesklo b lack t opped p ieces i s n ot v ery c lear. H owever ,
what
v ariations t echnique d oes
h as
w ithin
n ot
b een
s ecurely
( Chourmouiiades, t he T hessalian
c onstitute
a ny
o r t he f abric
t reatment
t hat
was
T hessaly
f rom
t he
s tage
c haracteristic
e stablished,
1 971B:
o f
t he
minute
t he
s equence :
f rom
f rom where
experimentation
ware
i s
b ased
o n
w ell
s tylistic
p osition
i t
i s
t his
and
I t
accidental
c ontrolled
o xidation
f iring
t radition e xtended i ts
c eramic 1 964:
f eatures
3 0).
t ypical
H owever,
( Mersin X XV-XXVI, T he
o f
a n orthern a nd
c loser
H acilar V II)
d ifference
b etween
i s,
I t hink,
e astern
p art
o f
a D ark
B urnished
s eems
T hessalian a part
t radition
b lack
f rom
t o
b e
a v ariety
s outhern o f
i ts
B alkan
a rea
o f
millennium
i s
i n
( French ,
i n Anatolian
t opped
t radition
t he
s pecific
a nd
1 981:
c eramic
t he V in n examples a re
i ncludes
b lack
b urnished
a nd
t he G reek b lack t opped d ecoration
a r ather
l ight
c oloured
t radition
o ften
However, t he emergence o f t he ware i n t he
( Garaganin ,
d istribution
which
1 971) while
r elated t o p ainted wares.
wares
b e e stablished.
c haracteristics s uch a s shapes and h andles; p olished wares ( Tringham,
i nfluence
t o t he e arly V in n c ulture ( Chapman,
n oticeable,
a I t
with t he u se o f
r epertoire
with s imilar
c annot
t he
t he s imilar wares a ttributed 1 18),
l inks
t o
t echniques.
c entral Greece
immediate r egions o f
i t
i s a lso t rue
f ar
t he
t his
t hat
c eramic p roduct d eveloped
s eems t hat t he T hessalian b lack t opped b eyond
o f
c lear
w ell k nown s hape r epertoire
t he e arly n eolithic p eriod .
t he c entre
o f
p ottery
d eparture
d espite
1 65),
1 963:
c entral
c omplicated
1 )
a nd
a nd
e specially
e astern
( Grammenos,
t he
Macedonia
1 975:
2 19).
c haracter
i n
t he
What
5 th
b ecomes
n ecessary i s t he n eed f or t he distinction o f l ocal groups with c lear c hronological i n
c entral
There
r eferences,
Macedonia
s eems
I t
t opped
v ariegated
a nd
P eloponnesos 1 972: I II .
b lack t opped p ottery c ontinues
a c onsiderable
t ime
( Rodden,
t o b e a lso a methodological p roblem
d istinction . b lack
s ince
f or
n ot
c lear
whether
p ottery
i s
f rom
t he
B untpolierte
a s
i ts
wares
c ounterpart,
i t
i s
b ulk a nd
t he
f rom
n amely
t o
i solate
s imilarly
what
t he
5 64).
i nvolved i n s uch a
j ustifiable
o f
t o o ccur
1 964:
i s
c onsidered
r ainbow
t he
d ecorated
c ategory
i n
t he
( French ,
5 ). T he whole 5 th m illenium
o f
t he
c haracteristic
o f
motifs
e specially
i s
p ainted
d efined
wares
i n T hessaly
b y many i n t erms o f
which
a nd
a ppeared
i n
c entral G reece
t he v olume
a g reat
v ariety
( Theochares,
1 973 :
6 0). Local s tyles b ased o n d ifferent d ecorative p atterns were d istinguished a t av ery early s tage ( Wace-Thompson, 1 912) and r ecent s tudies have
b rought u p t o d ate
t hese p ottery g roups ( French,
t he
d efinition a nd
1 972).
d istribution
b ackground with dark p aint o r a dark o ne with l ight d esigns b asically
two
c ategories
r espectively
r ed-on-cream
k inds
wares
o f
a re
p ottery
( Tsountas,
wares,
t he
1 908) .
p redominant
o f
T he i dea o f d ecorating a l ight s o-called
H owever ,
s preading
t o
e astern T hessaly and c entral G reece d espite
i t
a w ide
t he
A 3b
s eems
c reated a nd
A 3a
t hat
t he
a rea o f
existence
o f
s outhl ocal
s tylistic v ariations l ike t he C haeronea ( A3b3) and L ianokladi ( A36). F rench h as s uggested t hat t he wide d istribution o f t he r ed-on-cream p ottery
a ll
o ver
G reece
may
a nticipate
t he
e xistence
o f
many
r egional
groups ( 1972, note 9 ) s uch a s t he p ainted wares f ound i n P eloponnesos ( Fig. 7 9). A lthough t here a re no r ecent e xcavations which c ould have t hrown n ew l ight a s
t o t he c haracter a nd
f rom t he s ite o f A gios P etros,
s urveys
1 00
e xtent
o f
which w ere
t hese
g roups,
c arried o ut
a part
i n a reas
s uch
a s e astern Macedonia ( Grammenos,
1 975:
1 93,
1 980: 1 5), Thrace ( Efstratiou, 1 979) and i ndicate t he a bsence o f r ed p ainted p ottery.
R egarding t he n orth-eastern p art o f G reece, p resence o f s tylistic
s uch p ottery w ould
i nfluence
( French ,
b e u nlikely
1 970 :
5 )
G rammenos - F otiades,
Euboea
( Sampson,
I would t hink t hat
b ecause o f
a nd
1 981)
s ince
t he
t he s trong B alkan
e ven
t he
b lack-on-red
v ariation i s c onsidered a s i mport f rom t he n orth ; t he o nly s ign o f a s outhwards o rientation o f A egean Macedonia, a lways s peaking i n s tylistic t erms,
i s
t he b lack t opped p ottery a s i t h as b een e xemplified
f rom t he e xcavations o f S itagroi ( Phase I I - R enfrew, o nly s ite w ith p ainted d ecoration s o f ar k nown i n t he
1 970 : 2 96) . T he r egion was f ound
i n t he p lain o f S erres where p ottery with white-on-red p atterns b etrays r elations with K aranovo I a nd S urprising was
t he F TN ( Grammenos - F otiades,
a lso t he e vidence f rom E uboea where a part
1 980 :
2 0).
t he
s ite
f rom
o f Varka mentioned b y Theochares ( 1959: 2 86), ( Sampson, 1 975: 6 7) n o o ther p ainted p ottery o f m iddle n eolithic d ate h as b een f ound i n o ther p arts
o f
w estern
t he i sland . s ide
Thus
T his
( Sampson ,
t he
p ainted
i s e specially s urprising o n i ts n orthern a nd
1 981) . p ottery
o f
A gios P etros
e vidence which e xtends t he v arieties wares
i n G reece.
i nvolved
t o b e
s omething more t han a n o ffshoot o f
- Z erelia
i ndividual
s eems
t he o nly n ew
d istribution o f
t he
I ts d istinctive d ecorative motifs a nd
suggest
C haeronea
and
t radition
e lements
o f
s outh-east
i dentified a s
S esklo
t he l inear A3b
T hessaly .
o rientated
p ainted
t he s hapes
S ince,
f eatures
h owever, d o
e xist,
t he p osition o f t he Agios P etros p ainted wares must b e c onsidered a s b roadly w ithin t he T hessalian g roup.
t he
S tylistically s peaking, i t i s a pparent t hat t he p ainted wares f rom a reas o f s outh-east T hessaly, Phtiotis and s outh Locris s hare
c ertain s imilarities v ariety o f
r egarding
o pen b owls,
t heir s hapes
a nd d ecoration ;
g lobular j ars a nd s imple p ainted
t here
m otifs,
i s
a
l inear
o r s olid, p ersisting f rom e arlier s tages. A lthough s trong l ocal l inear t raditions b ased o n s pecific d ecorative d esigns c an b e i solated i n S perheios
v alley a nd s outh L ocris ( Lianokladi - O rchomenos - C haeronea)
which p robably e xtended t heir i nfluence motifs
which
c an
b e
d escribed
( Servia i n Macedonia , o f
e ach
s ite
s pecific h as o n
t o
i s
t o t he n orth a s f ar a s
l inear
h ave
b ut
s uch a s
o nly h ave
c riteria
wider
Z erelia,
d istribution
A nd s ince t he d ecoration
n ever i dentical w ith o ther s ites a s t he
u se
o f
s lip
a re
r ely o n more g eneral c haracteristics .
s tylistic
much
N emea i n P eloponnesos) .
s imilar
f eatures,
a s
which
l ack
p recise
c oncerned
I n a ny c ase,
s tratigraphical
a ny
f ar a s
g rouping
g roups b ased c ontexts
c an
l imited c hronological s ignificance.
Generally s peaking, d ark-on-light p ainted p ottery s eems t o b e a Greek
d evelopment
c oncerned . t he
s ame
l east
a s
f ar
a s
t he
r ed-on-cream
I ts d istribtion e xtends a s f ar n orth a s N . i dea
o f
( black-on-red)
d ecorating
i s
( StarClevo-Körös 1 970: 2 1,
a t
a pparent
c ulture)
a l ight
i n
o ther
b ackground s ites
and A egean Thrace
S itagroi - R enfrew,
1 970: 2 96).
o f
ware
N ikomedeia while
with a dark
t he
i s
s outhern
d esign Balkans
( Dikili Tas - D eshayes,
However, i t
i s n oticeable
t hat c ertain motifs o f r ed-on-cream d ecoration ( solid s tyle) a re c onsidered t o b e t raits o f t he c ontact z one b etween t he F TN a nd G reece, t he
s o-called
Macedo-Bulgarian a rea ( Nandris,
10 1
1 970 :
1 92).
M oreover
r ed
p ainted
wares
e ither
f ound
i n
t he
n orthern
s ite
( Rodden, 1 964: 5 64) o r a s f ar s outh a s N emea, r ich t radition o f A natolia. 6 .4.
o i
N .
N iKomedeia
a re o rientated
t o
t he
T echnology: The
5 th
millennium
t echnological
i n
t raditions
G reece
which had
s aw
t he
b een
d evelopment
i nitiated
i n
o f
t he
many
p revious
p eriod a nd n ow r eached t heir p eak. A ll t he d irect a nd i ndirect evidence f rom this p eriod s hows t hat t he 5 th millennium e xperienced g radual T his
a nd
u ninterrupted
p rocess
t echniques
i n n o
s ocial,
way h ampered
e ither
within
e conomic
t he
a nd
s pread
o f
t echnological f urther
t he G reek mainland
and
p rogress .
i nnovations
among
a nd
i ts v arious
r egions o r f rom a djacent c ultural a reas o f t he north or t he e ast; t he
c ontrary
w e
c an
s ee
t he
s uccessful
a n a lready e stablished f ramework o f
i ncorporation o f
p ractices.
b etween e arly a nd m iddle n eolithic ( Holmberg ,
The
1 964,
n ew i deas
suggested W einberg ,
o n i nto
c hange
1 965) c an
o nly b e explained i n t erms o f a n overemphasis p ut upon i solated f eatures w hich a re e xamined a long a s trictly t ypological l ine. P ottery o bjects f rom o f
c lay
manufacture,
f igurine
t he e veryday l ife o f
f or a wide
shapes which h ave characterized
b y
r ange
o f
material,
t his
s pindle-whorls
a nd
o ther
p eriod i ndicate a n e xtensive u se
a ctivities.
The
c eramic
wares
employ
b asically e volved f rom e arlier f orms b ut a re n ow f ine
fabric
and
quality .
The
b lossoming
o f
t he
p ainted wares i s d irectly r elated t o t he c onditions o f e conomic a nd s ocial
f lourish
a nd
e xperimental a ttempts t o r each a d egree o f s tandardization . important r esult o f t his s tandardization i s t he e xistence o f l ocal
s tability ,
which
A n a nd
r egional
s tyles .
p ainted
d ecorative
r epresent
I n
a llowed
r eal
t echnological
motifs
a d ramatic
p articular
and
c hange.
t echniques
t erms,
t o
h owever ,
t he
variability
The
h andmade
i n
t he
d ifferent
shapes
p ottery,
d o
not
p ainted
o r
monochrome, was f ired i n o vens a t a well-controlled t emperature a nd t hen t here f ollowed t he f inal t reatment o f t he s urface; a lthough t he r ed
monochrome
p ottery
( Al)
i s
c ertainly
a t echnological
improvement,
t he t emperature r equired i s n ot h igh and t ne d ecoration i s i n n o way r elated t o f iring p rocedures a s i s t he c ase with o ther wares s uch a s t he
' graphite'
i n s outh B ulgaria
( Denell,
1 978:
8 ).
S tone t ools a re abundant and t hey b egin t o a cquire a f ixed f orm a lthough t he f unction o f s ome t ools i s n ot c lear ( Higgs-Jarman , 1 972) ; t he
small
P etros,
p olished
' chisels ',
f or
i nstance ,
which a re
p resent
i n
A gios
a re u sually c onsidered a s i ndirect e vidence f or woodcarving
( Nandris,
1 977: 5 3) i n south-east E urope s ince wooden artifacts have
b een f ound i n Anatolia ( Mellaart, 1 967: 2 15) and many s hapes o f v ases r ecall p rototypes
f rom
t hat
material .
implements such a s querns, s eems
t o f ollow a c learly f unctional I t
t he
i s
f ocus
i nclusive t hat
i s
r egrettable o f
t hat
k nown
a bout
c omes
a re n ot
t he
a ttention ,
c hronological o r
millennium h owever ,
g reater
t ypology o f
l ine o f
t he
t he b igger s tone
c hipped f or
n o
i nterpretation.
s tone
i ndustries
d etailed
s tudy
t ypological c lassification .
t he
f rom
T he
mortars and g rinders i s n ot c lear b ut i t
obsidian
a nd
p ublication
c onsidered a s
f lint o f
h ave
r emains t he
n ot
p roduced
b een a ny
T hus e verything
individual
r epresentative o f
1 02
h as
o f
t he
s ites
p eriod
a s
5 th
which, a whole
( Evans - R enfrew, One
v ery
1 968).
s ignificant
f actor
i s
t he
q uantity o f o bsidian i n many n eolithic s ites neolithic s pecific
o nwards
t ogether
with
t ypes o f a rtifacts l ike
i ndividual
t ypes
a re
t he
t he
explained
gradual f rom
p rogressive
p arallel
i n
i ncrease
t he
s ided
f unctional
e nd
o f
i n
t he
t he
e arly
e stablishment b lades ;
t erms
o f
s ometimes
a s
t hese
a re
d ictated b y f actors s uch a s e nvironment a nd e conomy ( Belmont - R enfrew, 1 964: 3 95). I n l ine with t his t he p resence o f s ickle-blades i n Agios P etros c ould b e t aken a s s trong e vidence f or t he p ractice o f f arming. The u se o f b one i s c ommon f or t he manufacture o f t ools a nd t o a l esser e xtent o f
o ther o bjects
l ike amulets,
o rnaments a nd b eads .
B one
p oints which a re s ometimes c alled awls, n eedles a nd p ins outnumber o ther t ypes such a s t ubular " chisels" a nd s patulae which s eem t o b e quite r are d uring t he middle n eolithic p eriod ( Thessaly-Crete). G reek objects
a re n ot
material ( Nandris, f inds
i n t he
a nimal b ones
with
t he
variety o f
the
The
F TN
b one
5 3) and t he q uality o f t he middle n eolithic 1 971:
1 05) although
t he
p resence
o f
i n b oth r egions d oes n ot d iffer n oticeably.
a re
c ertain e ither
t echnology a nd s uggest
1 977:
B alkan ( Tringham,
However, s patulae
c omparable
characteristic
missing
f unction
a g eneral
o r
t hings
v ery a re
b one
r are
n ot
u se i n c lothing,
t ools
l ike
i n G reece .
c lear .
A s
Most
o f
spoons
r egards t he
a nd t heir
b one
t ools
s kin s craping o r p ottery making
( burnishers). I ndividual t ypes which s tand out b ecause o f t heir quantity o r f orm, may b e r elated t o s pecialized a ctivities ( Evans, 1 964:
2 36 - Agios P etros,
s ee
s ection 4 .3.) .
T he
l ack o f
s tudies
o n o r
about t he p recise u se o f each o f t hese t ools r aises questions o f t erminology a s well . What, f or i nstance, t he t erm ' bone c hisel ' means i s n ot c lear,
s ince i t
i s d oubtful
t hat s uch a t ool
u sed a s a c hisel i n i ts c onventional d efinition . f act
i s
t hat
b asic
t ypes
o f
b one
i mplements
would
h ave
b een
N evertheless,
r emained u nchanged
t he
b efore
and during t he 5 th millennium a s t he material o f t he s ites i ndicates ( Sesklo - T heochares,
1 973).
B asic b uilding c onstruction m ethods
c ontinued
t he
t radition o f t he
6 th millennium . S tone f oundations, u sually i n a r ectangular p lan , a mudbrick s uperstructure c onstitute t he f ramework o f t he h ouses:
a nd t he
use
the
of
wood
either
c onstruction o f c lay h ouse
models
t he
in
the
r oof
i s
f rom
form
o f
columns
( Sesklo)
or
in
p articularly n oticeable i n t he s urviving
M irini,
K rannon
a nd
e lsewhere
( Chourmouziades,
1 969: 3 6) . H owever , r ecently t he r emarkable s tate o f p reservation w ooden p arts o f h ouses f rom t he s ite o f P rodromos made i t p ossible e valuate
t he
a dvances
a chieved
i n
( Chourmouziades, 1 971A : 1 64). T sangli, i nfluence a lthough
g round
1 965:
t echnologically
w orking a nd u se o f
have
b een s een a s
3 3) - C an Hasan
t hey
t his material
I n o ther s ites l ike O tzaki, S esklo a nd
p lan variations
( Weinberg,
t he
o f t o
do
n ot
s igns o f
28 - ( French,
b etray
a ny
f oreign
1 963:
i nnovation ;
2 9) s uch
v ariations c an b e explained p erfectly well i n p ractical t erms. An u pper s torey i s v ery l ikely and f eatures l ike i nternal b utresses a nd w ooden b eams m ust
b e s een i n t hat c ontext.
The 5 th m illennium g enerally s aw t he c onsolidation a nd p ersistence o f o ld
t echniques n ot a s
a r esult
o f
1 03
c onservatism
b ut
a s
a c onsequence
o f e conomic a nd s ocial s tability . T echnological i deas d eveloped t o t he d egree t hat i nternal c ommunal s tructural f actors a llowed a nd r equired, w ithout a ny s udden i ntroduction o f e lements f rom a broad. 6 .5 S ocial a nd E conomic o rganization: The
main
e vidence
f or
t he
s ocial
a nd e conomic o rganization o f
p rehistoric c ommunities o f t he 5 th millennium c omes f rom
t he f ew
t he
s ites
which have b een a dequately e xcavated a nd p ublished. And a lthough a f air amount o f i nformation i s a vailable f rom a reas l ike T hessaly a nd n orthern G reece o wing t o d etailed i nvestigations a nd g eomorphological
a nd
e nvironmental
s tudies
t he p ublication o f
( Bintliff,
1 976:
2 41),
t he
a ctual p ublished material i s e xtremely p oor , e ither c onsisting o nly o f p reliminary r eports ( Sitagroi, N . N ikomedeia, S ervia) ( Hubbard, 1 979: 2 26)
o r
c overing
disadvantage
only
i s
o ld
that
material
without
i ntercommunity r elationships a s
( Sesklo,
properly
cannot
i nterregional b e
c omparisons
substantiated.
T he
main
settlements,
r epresented b y t he s patial d istribution
o f a rtefacts a nd a rchitectural c orrelations Moreover
C haeronea). studied
S o
a nd
a re
d ifficult
p ossible
i nevitably
t o
e stablish .
l ocal d ifferentiations
e very
a ttempt
ends
i n
g eneralizations a nd b iased j udgments which may b e t rue u p t o a p oint, b ut l ack t he s upport o f s pecific a rchaeological d ata ( Milisauskas, 1 978). The s ize o f t he s ettlement a nd t he i ndirect e vidence f rom which t he p opulation c an b e c alculated a re of
social
organization.
exploitation
patterns
They
i n
t he
a d irect
a ssociated
with
f eatures
l ike
dwellings .
S ince t he s ize o f
main
b oth way
t he
p arameters
r elate while
s ize
a nd
t o
i ndirectly
t he
t he s ettlements o f
f or a ny
s tudy
subsistence
p lan o f
t he
and
t hey
a re
i ndividual
5 th millennium
i s
e mpirically e stimated ( Renfrew, 1 972: 2 37, T able 1 4V) a nd t he o verall l ay-outs o nly a ssumed, i t i s natural t hat s ites l ike S esklo have f ocused
a great
e valuation material
o f
d eal
t he
h as
n ot
o f
a ttention .
s ite-size b een
t reated
c ompletely a bsent ( Chapman , e lements
which
i nstance,
t hat
have
1 981:
n ot
t he
n ucleus
Moreover, o n
t he
s eriously t aken
i nto
a rrangement
o f
i t
s eems
d ensity s ince
o f
t he
s ettlement
d ensity f rom
r eports
The o f
i ts
t he
s urface a re
T here a re a lso
a ccount.
a nd
t hat
t he
s uch
4 3) f rom G reek s ites .
b een
a rchitectural
d ifterentiate
b ased
i dea,
f or
dwellings
more
may
p eripheral
a reas s eems r easonable b ut e xtensive e xcavations h ave b een a pplied o nly t o a l imited n umber o f s ites and t hus t he c onclusions a re n ot r epresentative . s ettlements, density
are
s ettlements e xploitation p ointed
Moreover ,
g eneral not
s ince
a ll
o f
e nvironmental
r eally
h elpful.
t he
k nown G reek
s ites
a re
f actors
d etermining
t heir
s ize
r estricted
s ize
o f
The
i ndicates h igh o ccupation d ensities a nd a s table, p attern o f
o ut ( 1981:
4 4),
t he
s urrounding
a rea .
u nenclosed s ettlements,
H owever,
a s
which m ight
t ell a nd
t ell
l ong t erm
C hapman b e
h as
t he c ase
f or many undetected s ites i n t he hilly a reas o f t he G reek mainland, p resuppose no a rtificial r estrictions r egarding t he extent o f t heir o ccupation and d ensity . u nenclosed s ettlement" f rom
t hat
o f
N evertheless,
h as a q uite
s outh-east
E urope,
i t i s p ossible t hat t he
t erm
d ifferent m eaning i n t he G reek a rea
f ollowing
t he
modest
s ize
o f
t he
t ell
s ites. More
s pecifically,
S esklo
h olds
1 04
a p rominent
p osition
i n
t he
c ultural way
b e
s equence
o f
c onsidered
t he
a s
5 th millennium.
an o rdinary
A lthough
s ettlement
t his
o f
t he
s ite c an i n n o
p eriod,
surely
p articular a spects o f i t s uch a s i ts s ize, number o f i nhabitants a nd d efensive a rrangements h ave b een o veremphasized ( Theochares, 1 973: 6 5) . H owever, i t s till p rovides t he b ulk o f o ur i nformation i n r egard t o t he s ocial
a nd e conomic
o rganization
r eports ( Theochares,
1 968:
o f
2 4)
t he
i t
i s
p eriod .
F rom
s uggested
t hat
t he a t
p reliminary l east
i n t he
a rea o f t he a cropolis t he a rchitectural a rrangement o f t he b uilding f ollowed a p re-conceived a nd p recise l ay-out p lan with s traight a nd p arallel
s treets a round a c entral
b uilding .
O utside t he
a cropolis
a lso
t he h ouse p lans were well d efined with o pen c ourts while Thechares s uggested t hat t he whole s ettlement c onsisted o f smaller u nits o f f our o r f ive h ouses; i t i s n ot c lear whether t hese groups o f h ouses, i f t hey r eally c onstitute a g roup , i ndicate s omething more t han a s imple a rchitectural a rrangement . S pecialized a ctivities i n a ny o f t he h ouses h ave not b een d etected, a part f rom the s o-called p ottery workshop ( Tsountas,
1 908).
F undamental q uestions,
h owever ,
a re s till u nanswered
mainly b ecause o f t he l ack o f p ublished material. b etween
t he
( Sections
a cropolis
B and
C )
( Section
i s
obscure
A )
and
s ince
The r elationship
t he
r est
o f
i s
very
p robable
i t
t he
s ettlement t hat
t he
a cropolis was n ot f ortified ; t he f unction o f t he e nclosures h ave b een r ecently r einterpreted i n q uite d ifferent t erms ( Chourmouziades, 1 979) a nd
c ertain
t ools
( Efstratiou, What
7 9).
not
c lear
i s
occupied
n ot
i s
p roblems
( Theochares,
neolithic
s ite.
n ecessarily
whether
s imultaneously
s tratigraphical unsolved
a re
1 982:
in i n
Moreover,
o r n ot
the
5 th
s ome
1 976);
house
t o
h ouse
d ifferentiations
which,
( Kotsakis,
t he
t he
8 7) .
warfare
s ettlement
was
b ecause
s ite
extent
the
a ppear
t o
o f
early
t he
b e
d istribution o f a rtefacts a nd
p roduced
h owever,
1 981:
whole
o f
was
s patial
e specially o f t he p ainted p ottery h as f rom
t he
with
millennium,
a reas
o r what
t he
a ssociated
noticeable v ariations
d oes
I t
i s
not
b etray
a lso
f unctional
r egrettable
t hat
t he
c emetery o f t he s ite o f S esklo h as n ot b een l ocated b ecause a lthough t he
i ntramural
n eolithic
b urial
p eriod ,
o f
a dults
children
must
h ave
c ontinued
b een
b uried
during
most
e lsewhere
o f
( Evans,
t he 1 971:
1 16). G enerally
s peaking ,
t here
a nd s ize o f t he s ettlement o f p eriod.
A lthough
a ttributed
t o
t he
( Chourmouziades, a nd s ubsistence Apart
o nly a s
o f
small
a r esult
s trategies
f rom
t o
b e
s peculations
movement 1 979)
s eems
c an
t he 1 978:
which
b e
p opulation
o f
( Renfrew,
c onclusions
a d ecline
i n t he p opulation
S esklo b y t he e nd o f t he middle n eolithic made u nits
f ailure
o f
this
h as
t owards s pecific
o f
S esklo
i s
o f
t he
s ocial
d erive
d ifficult
t o
s tructure
e ven
substantiate
s ea
e conomic
3 02). f rom
t he
p osition o f
c ommunity within t he wider e volutionary s cheme ( Sahlins, r econstruction
b een
t he
i n
s ettlements
t he
1 972) t he
o t
a rchaeologically .
t he s ize T his
i s
b asically d ue
t o o ur l ack o f s ystematic r ecords c oncerning b oth t he
q uantitive
q ualitive d ifferences
o r
a nd
r egional
e ven more
d ifficult
e xcavations t he
b asis
( culture) a nd
o f
t he a
t o
which o ccur
l evel ( Chapman, d etect
when
i nterregional
l imited
n umber
t he
1 981:
o nly e vidence
r elationships o f
1 05
i n a d omestic
5 3).
c riteria,
h ave
( house)
S uch a p rocess c omes t o
b e
mainly
f rom
i s
t rial
e xamined o n t he
c eramic
t raditions. T he o f
t he
e xistence
G reek
p ainted which
p ottery)
were
o f
C learly
mainland may
f avoured
T hessalian
during
t he
s upport
b y
a ssemblages
5 th
t he
o ver
m illennium
a w ide
( figurine
i dea o f c ulturally d ominant r egions
e nvironmental
a nd
s ubsistence
f actors .
I ndeed,
t he d ensity o f o ccupation i n t he Thessalian p lain ( Theochares, Map 4 ) f avours t he a cceptance o f
a rea
t ypes,
s ome k ind o f s ettlement
mechanism o f which i s d ifficult t o d etect.
o f e xploitation may b e
1 69, F ig. 1 9).
e qually p ossible t hat we have t o a ccept
t he
The s uggested s atellite
a rrangement o f s ites a round a c entre f or r easons one e xplanation ( Chourmouziades, 1 979:
1 973,
h ierarchy ,
H owever, i t i s
t he p resence o f a number o f
c entres,
t he s imilarities among which c an b e explained i n t erms o f
c ontacts
and
t raits
and
t rade .
I n
exchange
e stablished
t his
i tems
mechanisms
o f
r espect
t he
( Renfrew, c ontact
d istribution
1 972:
o f
4 65)
e ither
o f
s pecific
documents
economic
o r
well
s ymbolic
c haracter. The 5 th millennium g roups
a dapted
t echnological p assed
t he
i n Greece s aw t he e stablishment o f f arming
successfully advances
s tage
o f
a nd
t o
l ocal
r elying
e xperimentation
e nvironments
o n
s ocial
s ince
t he
u sing
c onditions
c ertain
which
a rchaeological
h ad
e vidence
f rom Thessaly i ndicates t he p ractice o f well p lanned a griculture ( J. R enfrew,
1 973A :
a ctivities p atterns
o f
a re
2 8) .
F arming a nd
p rehistoric c learly
t he g razing o f a nimals
were t he
main
c ommunities whose e conomic a nd s ubsistence
s upplemented
gardening, h unting a nd f ishing.
b y o ther
f ood
r esources
s uch
a s
The l and u se and i ts r elation t o t he
s ettlement l ocation and s ize have b een e xtensively d iscussed b y t he m ethod
o f
l ocational
i s c ertain t hat
t heir c atchment s olely
in
r esources
a reas.
t erms a s
a nalysis
o f
s ome
T o e xplain,
t he
F inzi,
e conomic
h ave
mechanisms
p rehistoric c ommunity .
h owever,
a vailability
g eographers
o versimplify e conomic a c learly
( Higgs - V .
1 972:
2 7)
i ndividual s ites p roduce i regularities o f
a nd
l ike
t ypes
t he
t o
L east
a nd
( Chisholm,
t echnological
I t i s v ery d ifficult
c haracter
i t
t he l ocation o f a s ite
s oil
s uggested
a lthough
i n t he e xtent o f d esirable
1 968)
f actors
s eems
w ithin
t o t he
i ntroduce p rinciples
E ffort
p rinciple
o f
without
h aving e stablished o r e ven c ommented u pon t he p ossible s ocial d imension o f
a gricultural
n eolithic l ocational
p lanning,
f arming s tudies
m isleading r esults T here G reek h ave 1 981:
i s
n o
mainland o ccurred 1 94) .
o r
t he
t he
qualitive
d ivision
concentrate
( Bintliff,
d oubt
d uring
t hat t he
d epending However,
on
o f
t he
quantitive
empirical
t hus,
s cheme
o f
i nevitably
observations
with
1 977). w ithin
t he
m ixed
5 th m illennium,
o n
a nd
l abour;
t he
r egional
p otential
d ensity
o f
f arming e conomies
l evel
o f
o ccupation
o f
v ariabilities l and-use i n
t he
t he must
( Halstead, p lains
o f
Thessaly, Argolid, Macedonia a nd t he h illy c ountry o f c entral Greece which o ffer p lenty o f a rable l and c limatic
c hanges
i n
t he
whole
t ogether w ith t he l ack o f s ignificant
B alkan
r egion
( Chapman ,
u niform dry s teppe vegetation ( Jacobsen,
1 974:
i ndicate
e conomy .
g enerally
a h omogeneous
n eolithic
a vailable e vidence i s o nly c ircumstantial
s ince
4 5,
t he
1 981:
8 9)
B ottema,
a nd
N evertheless, s oil
maps
a
1 974), t he
r elating
t o s ite d istribution a re modern while t he r epertoire o f f inds i s n ot r ich 3 9).
e nough
t o
Q uantitive
i ndicate
s ubsistence
o ccurrence
o f
t ools
1 06
v ariations a ssociated
( Chourmouziades, w ith
f arming
1 981:
( querns,
mortars,
p estles)
s imilar
e vidence
s urely f or
i ndicates
animal
p reference
h erding
a nd
f or
s uch
hunting
a ctivities
a re
l ess
b ut
obvious.
L ocal e nvironmental p eculiarities i n s ettlements l ike N . N ikomedeia ( Bintliff,
1 976:
2 41)
a re
n ot
t ranslated
i nto
t echnological
e conomic t erms i n t he material r emains o f t he s ite ( Halstead, Note
2 ).
The
same
environments i dentified I n
A gios
b one
with
t he
P etros,
r emains
happens
( island
s uspected
f or
with
s ites)
t he
economies
t he
s ubsistence
i nstance,
o utnumber
the
where t he
f ish
f inds
a nd
specialized
c annot
p attern
a gricultural
b ones
o f
t hey
d irectly
o perate
i mplements
f ishing
and
1 981:
t ools .
a nd
I t
b e
w ithin . a nimal
may
well
b e t he c ase t hat i nadequate r ecovery t echniques a re r esponsible f or t his p henomenon, ( Higgs-Jarman,
b ut i t 1 972:
u ncertain t o u s;
i s a lso
9 )
t he
t he s tudy o f
p ossible
c haracter
t hat o f
a s H iggs
n eolithic
h as
p ointed
t ools
i s
o ut
s till
t heir c ontextual p osition c an c ontribute
much i n t his a rea ( Evans - R enfrew,
1 968:
7 9).
E conomic f actors c an have a multiple e ffect o n t he c haracter o f t he c ommunity. R enfrew, 1 966:
The c ultivation o f c ertain c rops i n Thessaly ( J. 2 1) c an b e c onsidered a s d irect evidence f or t he
p erennial o ccupation o f many s ites. s upplemented p rehistoric
b y wild p lants, man g radually
Their y ear l ong s upply o f f ood
whose c ontribution t o
r educed
f rom
t he
t he d iet o f
t he
e arly n eolithic p eriod
o nwards ( Milisauskas, 1 978 : 5 9) h as b een s een a s a n e conomic s ecurity which was p rovided a s trong r eason f or e stablishing p ermanent v illages ( J.
R enfrew,
1 973A :
2 8).
T he e vidence f or d omesticated a nimals i s a lso a bundant mainly f rom e arly n eolithic t he
s ites,
a rchaeological
a lthough
r emains
may
c ertain h ave
p roblems
o f
i nterpretation
a c onsiderable e ffect
and subsistence t erms f or t he s ettlement ( Halstead, d ifference t rying s ome
b etween
t o e stimate
s ignificance
s imply t he i n
e conomic a rrangements r equired
e xtensive
f or e cological
o r
c ounting
n umber
t he
o f
t o
o f a s ite .
o ther
l and
r easons
b ones
i ndividual
a ttempt
p asture
t he
o f
1 981:
a c ertain
a nimals
c onceptualize
3 07). must
i f
t his
( density o f
was
n ot
s ites
i n
a nd
b e
s ubsistence
A l arge n umber o f a nimals a nd
The
s pecies
s urely
t he
o f
i n e conomic
would
a vailable
o f a nd
h ave
l ocally
T hessalian
p lain ,
overlap o f s ite c atchment a reas), i t might h ave g iven r ise t o o ther a ctivities l ike small s cale movements or even short distance t ranshumance
( Barker,
A lthough
1 975:
t ranshumance
8 5). i s
d ifficult
t o d etect
t here a re n o upland s ites f ound i n G reece, T hessaly
a re
c oncerned
such a p ractice
a rchaeologically
would
mean a l ong
movement o f population s ince t he n earest h igh grounds a re S o ,
i t
must b e a ssumed e ither
t hat
t he n umber o f
a nd t hey c ould g raze l ocally o r t hat n ot p ermanent, i sland
o f
Kyra
t ranshumance
P anagia
( Appendix
i s a c omplicated o ne .
V I) I t
that
restricted
l arge
were p robably
The e vidence p rovided b y t he i ndicates
t hat
t he
i ssue
o f
s hows t hat d istance a nd a ltitude
a re n ot a lways f actors which d irectly r elate and
d istance f ar away.
a nimals was n ot
t he T hessalian s ites
which i s v ery unlikely.
a nd
a s f ar a s s ome r egions o f
environments
such
t o
t ranshumance a ctivities
as
i slands
c an
p rovide
c onsiderable e cological v ariability. Although
seasonality
i s
o ften
t erritorial r esources a re i nsufficient
1 07
suspected
for
t o s ustain o n a ll
s ites
whose
t he y ear r ound
o ccupation , a lways i s
l ike
r iver
d ifficult
e vidence
t o
t or
b ank
p rove
t he
s ites,
c aves
s easonality
p resence
i n
o r
i sland
s ettlements,
a rchaeologically .
s tratified
c ontexts
U nless o f
i t
i s
t here
s easonally
o ccurring f ood r emains s uch a s molluscs, v ertebra o r f ish b ones a nd animals ( Bökönyi, 1 972: d ifficult
t o e stablish .
agricultural c riterion o f
t ools
a re
p ermanency
1 21),
t he s hort t erm o ccupation o f a s ite i s
O ther i ndications s uch a s s tone s tructures o ften i s n ot
misleading a lways
while
t he
r eliable .
I n
t he
P etros, h owever, t opography i s a s trong a rgument per manent occupation ( Appendix i ). Moreover, e nvironments f eatures
s uch
s uch
i ndicative
o f
a s
a s
c oastal
t he
s ites
p resence
o r
o f
i slands,
f resh
t he e xisting p otentialities
c ase
o f
s prings
a re
o ther o ften
f or p erennial o ccupation .
f act t his i s o ne o f t he c riteria which p oints
a
A gios
i n f avour o f a in r estricted
a c ombination o f
water
a nd
t opography a s
I n
t o a p ermanent o ccupation
in t he c ase o f Agios Petros i n c ontrast t o t he s easonal c haracter o f S aliagos
( Evans - R enfrew,
1 968).
The e vidence f or t he s ocial a nd e conomic o rganization o f Greek s ettlements during t he 5 th millennium i s f ar f rom s atisfactory. Excavations attempt
t o
on
g eneralizations a nd
a l imited
maximize
s cale
the
e specially
a nd
data
t rial
i nvestigations,
available,
inevitably
when d ealing w ith e nvironmental,
s ocial s trategies.
1 08
i n
t heir
l ead
t o
p roductive
7 .
W ESTERN ANATOLIA I N T HE L ATE 6 th a nd 5 th M ILLENNIA:
7 .1.
G eomorphological C onsiderations: A natolia
t o
t he
i s
a v ast
western
Mesopotamia,
r egion
f rontiers
t oday
e xtending
o f
r epresented
l ying
t he
b etween
t he
t hem,
s uch a s
enclosed
b asins
a re
l akes
t he
( Konya,
m ountainous c haracter o f a rea o f
t he
M editerranean t he
modern
which,
d ominant
( e.g.
t he
f rom
B lack
s tate
f eatures
Gölü)
d o
t o
T urkey.
chains o f
with t he h igh p lateau
G reat S alt Lake),
B urdur
c oast
S ea
o f
b y two massive p arallel
T aurus a nd t he P ontic,
f eatures
T he
and
b y
G eomorphologically i t i s d efined mountains,
f rom
P ersia
o f
t he
a rea .
Minor
h ighland valleys
n ot
a lter
t he
a nd
b asically
t he g reater p art o f A natolia.
western c oast,
h owever,
p resents
a nother
p icture .
R ivers a nd p lains mark t he l andscape c lose t o t he s ea a nd extend f ar i nland.
H eavy s edimentation,
f actors p lains 3 85) .
l ike
t he
s ea
l evel
i n c onjunction with o ther geological
c hange,
r esulted
i n
t he
c reation o f
f luvial
which a re t he d ominant environmental f eatures ( Evans, N arrow
r iver v alleys
l ike
t he
Maeander
a nd H ermos
1 971:
l ink t he
h igh
p lateau a nd t he west c oast f acilitating c ommunications a nd t raffic f rom p rehistoric t imes ( Mellaart,
1 964:
4 ).
N ear t he c oast d eltaic a reas
f orm extensive l owlands e specially i n t he a rea o f A khisar , H ermos
r iver
western
( Eisma ,
Anatolia
western A natolia
1 978:
i s
7 0,
F ig .
d ifferent
i tself
i s
n ot
2 ).
f rom
E nvironmentally
t he
G reek
h omogeneous .
( French,
1 967B:
5 0).
The
t he
r egion
mainland.
o f
However,
R egional v ariations
b etween t he c oastal a reas a nd t he p lateau a nd in vegetation
n orth o f t he
e xist
t hese p roduce d ifferences
c limatological
c onditions
p revailing s eem t o have b een a ffected d irectly b y t he g eographical p osition o f e ach a rea i n r elation t o i ts d istance f rom t he western ( Aegean) and northern ( Black S ea) c oasts and b y i ts p roximity t o i nland p lateau ( Mellaart, Local g eographical o r A khisar-Manisa , more c omplex .
d iversity among
h owever,
t he
1 76). a reas
s uch a s
make t he p icture o f
t he T road,
I znik
t he w estern c oast
much
The v alleys o f t he Troadic c oast h ave q uite d ifferent
environmental p lains A egean
1 954:
c haracteristics
o f B alikesir a nd ( Mellaart, 1 964 :
t o
t he
t ree-covered
h illy
a reas
and
Manisa a lthough b oth a re n ot v ery f ar f rom t he 3 ) . I t h as a lso b een s uggested t hat t he s trip
o f Mediterranean v egetation b ecame narrower while t he Palaeoboreal f orests expanded i n t he north and t he s teppes r etreated t owards t he s outh-east
( Erinq,
a rchaeological o ccupation a s
well,
m aterial
a s
b ut
1 978:
r ecord, o f
t he
S uch
p reservation
wooden s tructures
i n t he p lains
Further i nland Maeander
8 7) .
v alley ,
t he
d o
( Mellaart,
i n
c onsiderations
not o nly i n t erms o f
t he
a nd
n ot
1 964:
t ypical
B eycesultan
r ecovery
f orm
o bviously
t he a ctual c hances
mounds,
o f
u nlike
a ffect
t he
p rehistoric t he r emains t he
mudbrick
5 ).
Anatolian
r egion ,
o r
i n
p lateaux t he
l arge
o f
t he Upper
K onya
p lain ,
g eographical c limatological a nd e cological f actors c reate a d ifferent p icture. H igh a lluvial p lains c lose t o r ivers ( Cilicia) o r l akes a re e nclosed o f
b y
change
f eatures
mountains . i n
s uch
t hese a s
t he
T he
a reas a ctual
c limate d uring s ize
h as t he
o f
t he
c ertainly l ast
u ndergone
1 0,000
l akes
y ears,
a p rocess a ffecting
( Van-Iznik-Burdur),
t he
h ydrological b alance o f t he t errain ( expansion o f i nterior b asins a t
1 09
t he e xpense o f
i mpoverished r ivers) and r esulting i n c hanges i n t he
v egetation f rom y ears
a go
t o
t he
r elatively c ooler a nd moister c onditions
t he s emi-desert
i nterconnection
b etween
c haracter o f
t he
h igh
t oday ( Erin ,
p lains
1 978:
( Bey9ehir)
i s
5 ,000
9 0).
T he
o ften
v ery
l imited a nd t heir a ccess t o t he s ea a nd t he c oastal a reas r estricted ( Elmali). The c ommunications, A natolian t he
p lateau
h igh
c entral
w ere a reas
M editerranean s ea . s ome
o f
t hese
h owever,
a lways w ith
b etween t he A egean c oast
t hrough
t he
w ell
Marmara
e stablished
r egion o r
t he
were
i n
u se
a nd
i ndeed
o f
t hat a t
p rovide
t he
l inking
l owlands
A rchaeological i nvestigations c onfirm
r outes
a nd
r outes
t he
l east
e vidence
o f
habitation f rom t he neolithic p eriod o nwards ( Todd, 1 980). I n t he n orth t he I znik a rea p rovides a g ateway f rom t he K ütahya a nd E skise4ir p lains t hrough t he I negöl-Yen 4ehir l akes
t o
t he
( French,
Marmara
1 967B:
b etween
4 9).
S ea
a nd
r egions
f rom
The p lain o f
t he i nland mountains a nd
t here
and t o
t he
Manyas-Apolyont
t he
s outhern
t he c oastal T road a lso, t he s ea,
s eems
B alkans s ituated
t o give a ccess,
l east p artially, t o t he areas o f B alikesir a nd Manisa,
a t
a lthough b oth
a re c onsidered a s s eparate g eographical a nd a rchaeological entities ( French, 1 961: 9 9, 1 965: 1 5). The Akhisar-Manisa r egions, i nclude b asically t he L ower H ermos v alley a nd t he s urrounding a nd
mountains,
P lains
o f
a re
t he
c ommunication
w ith
( 9ivril-Elmali) a s 7 .2.
r ich
K aikos
S tate o f
i n
a nd
t he f ar
p rehistoric
Maeander
main
o ccupation ,
r ivers
v alleys
o f
s eemed t he
while
t o
h ave
western
t he
c oastal
p rovided
A natolian
i nland a s B eycesultan ( French,
which p lains
1 969:
s ome
p lateau
4 1).
r esearch :
The a reas which h ave p roduced most o f t he e vidence f or p rehistoric o ccupation i n Anatolia during t he l ate 6 th and 5 th millennia a re c oncentrated o f
mainly
B eycesultan
c ultures
o f
r eferring
i n
a nd
t he
Anatolia t he
h igh K onya p lain .
a t
t ime
t hat o f
T he h ave
metals
t he
s outh-western
c riteria
f or
p rogressed
b eyond
t he
s imply - t o 1 975:
t he c ontinuity o f
t he
- e arly
r egion
d efining
c halcolithic
Moreover,
existence
p lain ,
a ssigning a p redominant r ole t o t he P ainted P ottery (Mellaart, 9 ).
t o
t he
C ilician
c ultural
s equence
o f
t he
a rea
e specially o f t he 5 th millennium a s s hown i n t he s tratigraphy o f t he main s ites o f H acilar ( Mellaart, 1 970) a nd B eycesultan ( Lloyd-Mellaart, 1 962) h as n ot b een p roved. C ertain p roblems a re s till open t o question, ( Eslick,
s uch
1 980:
a s
t he
existence
o f
a m iddle
c halcolithic
p eriod
5 ).
R ecent explorations i n S .W. Anatolia s eem t o h ave p rovided more evidence f or t he cultural s equence o f t he a rea a lthough v ery l ittle material 2 24,
h as
1 981:
H asan ,
b een s o f ar p ublished ( Mellink,
1 95).
M ersin - a re
a d irect
1 977:
2 90, Duru,
1 980:
A t t he s ame t ime t he C ilician p lain cultures - C an r atner
i nfluence
o f
t he
r esult
developments
o f i n
a l ocalized e volution t he
Syrian
or
Konya
t han o f p lain
r egions. The
western
coast
and
the
eastern
Aegean
i slands,
which
geographically a re c onsidered a s p art o f Anatolia, h ave p roduced a d isappointing a rchaeological p icture with v ery f ew e xcavations c arried o ut
a nd
a n
e ven
more
o bscure
c ultural
1 10
s equence .
T he
r egional
s urveys
o f
t he e arly 6 0 's o n t he western c oast ( Mellaart,
1 961:
9 9,
1 965:
1 5,
1 967B:
4 9,
1 969:
4 1) were not
1 955:
8 0,
F rench,
f ollowed u p b y any
f urther s ystematic exploration, e ither i n t he s ame a reas i n o rder t o p roduce new f inds with a n on p robabilistic s urvey,
o r t o c over a reas
which until n ow were t otally i gnored s uch a s t he s trip o f t he A egean c oast f rom T roy t o H alicarnassus . f rom
t he
o ld
l imited
s oundings
Moreover,
( Levi,
u nstratified material ( Furness, p ublication o f t he e xcavations a t a n
i ncomplete
e xcavations ( Sampson ,
a nd
a t
1 979:
The
s ystematic
h ave
f or o ur
and
cultural
was
A spripetra i n Kos,
l ack o f
c arried
i solated
b ut
a ny
E ven
r eliable
t he
n ew
l atest
e vidence
knowledge
o f
I t
o ut
i n
c ome
i s t he
f rom
o f
t he
a f act
i slands
t hat
not
e astern A egean
c ave
s ites
( Ag .
a re b oth a s ingle
i slands G ala
while
i n C hios,
A rchangelos i n Rhodes) where t he d ifficulties o f
s tratigraphy a re well-known . o n
s equence.
p roduced
methodological.
s urvey
s tructure
a part
with i nteresting
1 956: 1 73) a nd d espite t he r ecent Emborio ( Hood, 1 981), s till p roduce
n ot
m ost o f t he t rial e xcavations
t he
2 35)
4 3) .
r easons
t heoretical
d isputed
R hodes
t he e astern i slands,
1 929 :
t he
T hese m ethodological d isadvantages a ffect
c ultural
t ypological
a nd
a ny o bjective c riterion .
s equence
s tylistic
which
i nevitably
f eatures
without
t ends t he
t o
r ely
s upport
o f
Thus, we h ave r eached a p osition where t he
p ossibility o f a l ocal c ultural d evelopment c annot b e d iscussed a nd t he i nterpretation o f t he b ulk o f t he material d epends o n i ts external s imilarities
w ith
r egions
a s
f ar
a part
a s
s outh-western
A natolia
a nd
t he Cyclades ( Renfrew, 1 972: 7 2).
I n a ddition, t he g eographical s pan
o f
n orth-west A natolia
t he e astern A egean i slands
f rom
t o
t he
s outhern
A natolian c oast, i s b ound t o p roduce r egional c ultural v ariations which a lso depend on t he c loseness o f t he i sland t o d evelopments o f t he Anatolian mainland. ( Lloyd-Mellaart,
This, h owever, has b een o nly l oosely d iscussed
1 962:
1 06).
I t i s t empting a lso t o s ee t he i slands merely a s a c ontact z one b etween Anatolia and G reece, a p ossible r oute o f exchange, t rade and c ommunications o r even a n i ntermediary f or c ultural t raits t o b e t ransmitted
westwards
d isproportionate d ifferent s carce
p eriods .
while
and
v ice
amount o f
t he
Material c losing
versa .
T here
a lso
s eems
a ssigned s tages
t o
o f
t he
t he
6 th
a nd
5 th
n eolithic
A natolia
t hat where
( Sperling ,
t he
1 977:
B eycesultan 1 96 ,:
t his
f ollows
mounds
3 05)
s equence
o f
p rovide i n
t he
c losely t he
t he
T roadic
a dditional
s outh
i s
p attern
p lain
( Kum
s tratified
w ell
o f
T epe,
i s t he
I t must b e B e p catepe) while
t he
1 7). T he l ack o f
was
a nd
( Lloyd-Mellaart,
western A natolian material a nd t he c omplete g ap i n o ur
i nformation a bout c oastal p rehistoric o ccupation l eaves t he
a
t he
n orth-western
material
e stablished
b e
f or
millennia
phases
b eginning o f t he b ronze age a re much b etter r epresented. s tressed
t o
e vidence i n t he e astern i slands
n ature
o f
within
e astern
t he
A egean
c ultural
h abitation
i nfluence
f unctioned a s an e xtension o f i t, whether
t he
i slands
c an
b e
u nanswered .
o f
t he
t he q uestion o f
Whether
Anatolian
t he
a rea
mainland
a nd
with t he s ame characteristics,
c onsidered
a s
a n
a utonomous
c ultural
o r
u nit,
with cultural differentiations based g eomorphological f actors, i s d ifficult t o
on environmental and s ay . I t i s r easonable,
h owever ,
s omething
t o
c onsider
t he
e astern
i slands
1 11
a s
d ifferent
f rom
t he
r est
a nd
o f
t he
A egean a rchipelago
g eographical
i n
t heir g eneral g eomorphological
f eatures.
Another p roblem which a rises f rom t he s tudy o f t he p rehistoric m aterial o f
t he e astern i slands
f ramework . d ating
o f
b econ .es
B ecause a ny
i s
e xtremely
s equence
i s
t he
r elative
unobtainable . a t
t he m ost
I n
Emborio
r eliable
Thus t his
and
i s
i nevitably
r espect
r ecently
( Hood,
c hronological
h azardous, t he
a bsolute
s tratigraphy s tratigraphic
published
s hould
b e
1 981).
C hronological f ramework: T o i solate c ultural p eriods
d ating i n
l ack o f a r eliable
c hronology
important.
e stablished
c onsidered a s 7 .3.
k ind
i f
o r
a ny
r elative
c ase,
s implifying
a n
c hronology a rtificial
c ultural
r elying e ither o n a bsolute - C 14 -
- t ypological, o peration;
p rocesses,
o r
o f
s tylistic
i t
i s
i n
c riteria
d anger
o veremphasizing
- i s,
o f
t he
o ver-
r ole
o f
c ertain f eatures . M ore i mportant i t m ay l ose t he o verall d evelopmental p icture o f t he s uccessive p hases. S pecific c eramic c haracteristics o ften
p revail
a t
t he
e xpense
o f
t he
i mportance o f
t he
c onditions
which
c reate t hem while environmental, ecological and t echnological r eferences a re t reated a s s eparate s tudies without t he a bility t o c ontribute
t o o ur o verall k nowledge o f
g eographical i solate
a nd
d imension, define
c hronological
t he p eriod .
E ven
t he u se o f
a s eemingly o bjective c riterion,
s patially
f ramework
c ultural
c an b e
f eatures
d ifficult,
within
t o
t he
t ry t o
a c ertain
mainly b ecause
t he s ame
c eramic t raditions a re i dentified i n d ifferent a reas a nd i n various c ontexts
( Mellaart,
T hus r eal
a p roblem
c ultural
r easons,
1 975: o f
t erms
h owever,
1 2).
d efinition i n
o f
Anatolia
c ertain
t erms
t he l ate 6 th a nd 5 th millennia i n
d oes
l ike
e xist.
F or
' chalcolithic '
methodological
a re
a lready i n u se
a lthough i t s eems t hat t he p resence o f metals h as nothing t o d o with t his d efinition ( Mellaart, 1 970: 9 9). T he c ultural s equence o f t he s econd h alf o f t he 6 th millennium i n t he A natolian p lateau a nd s outhwestern A natolia i s v ariations
s uggest
chalcolithic
p eriods
h owever ,
t here
material
a nd
1 965:
well u nderstood a nd u ninterrupted a lthough r egional a p ossible
o verlap
( Todd,
1 980:
i s a n oticeable
t he
a vailable
b etween
1 10).
c ultural
l ate
D uring
n eolithic
a nd
d iscontinuity j udging
r adiocarbon
d ates
e arly
t he 5 th millennium,
( Mellaart,
1 970,
f rom
t he
M ellink ,
1 33). S uch d ifferences a re b asically r epresented b y t he material r emains
o f
t he
K ey-sites
o f
H acilar
a nd
B eycesultan
i n
s outh-western Anatolia
and are r elated t o t he cultural s equence from early t o l ate c halcolithic a p eriod which r oughly c overs t he 5 th millennium. The E arly
P ainted
s ucceeding main
t he
Wares
c haracteristics
C ilician p lain . b een
o f
t he
p redominantly o f
e arly
c halcolithic
monochrome
t he
p eriod
f or
The l ate c halcolithic,
e xemplified
b y
t he
B eycesultan
s omething q uite d ifferent f rom
what
l evels t he
H acilar i s
Anatolian
o ne
a lready
i s
i n
t he
p lateau
a nd
many
k nown a nd
( V-I) o f
o n t he o ther h and,
s equence,
was
i n
( IX-VI),
i t
a s i t
h as
r espects h as
f rom
t he b eginning b een s een a s a n i ntrusive t radition ( Lloyd - Mellaart, 1 962:
2 73).
p ottery
I ndeed a ll t he external f eatures o f
s hapes,
d ecoration,
a rchitecture
1 12
a nd
b asic
t he c ulture s uch a s t echnology i ndicate
a b reak f rom
t he Hacilar
a round 5 ,000 B .C. However,
t radition,
( Mellaart,
t he
1 978:
which c eased t o e xist s ometime
8 4).
main question r emains
whether o r n ot
t here
i s
a n
o verlap b etween t he two cultures o r a well-defined gap e ither i n t he s tratigraphic t ypical
s equence
f eatures
o f
i ndividual
o ver t he a rea o f
The material o f
s ites o r i n t he d istribution o f
t he A natolian p lateau.
t he s ite o f H acilar
s hows no s igns o f
a ny l ate
c halcolithic p ottery and Hacilar I i s n ot f ollowed b y a nything r esembling B eycesultan ( level X I) d espite t he p resence o f s imilar f inds i n t he v icinity ( Mellaart, H acilar-Beycesultan s equence i s
n o
o f
t he
t race
n eolithic
o f
o verlap
p lace t he o f
o f
t o
t he
1 10).
a re
a nd
o r
s outh-western Anatolia i ntroduced
1 966:
c ultures
t hat
p eriods
I ndeed
t he
l ate
a rea f ully d eveloped,
a ll
o f
n ewcomers
i s
a s t o
f rom
c ulture
was
a nd a lthough t he s uggested n ot
1 965).
d irectly r elated i s
t o t he o rigin a nd n ature
t he existence and extent o f
c halcolithic .
a nd t han
i ndications
s ubstantiated,
I ts
t he Konya p lain - C an Hasan - where, l ocal d evelopment c halcolithic p eriod
f ull t here
t he a ppearance
A nother p roblem which i s m iddle
t he
a rea ,
b een
o f t he l ate c halcolithic c ulture a s
t he
o f
t he
a p lausible e xplanation f or
t he n ew t radition ( Mellaart,
k nown
i n
c halcolithic
o rigin - n orth-western A natolia - h as
a rrival
p eriod
r epresentative
c halcolithic
c ontinuity . a re
Thus a t l east i nsofar a s t he
c onsidered
p resence
h owever,
h as
b een
t he
t raced
i n
i t i s c onsidered a s a
a p hase c loser t o t he p receding e arly t he f ollowing l ate c halcolithic ( Mellaart,
1 966: 1 08). I n s outh-western Anatolia r ecent e xplorations i n t he E lmali p lain , h ave s uggested a p ossible middle c halcolithic p hase w ith p re-late
c halcolithfc
p ottery
c haracteristics
( Eslick,
1 980:
8 ).
H owever, t he e vidence f rom t he p ottery g roups o f K izilbel a nd L ower B aeba9i
a re
i nconclusive
s ince
s tratigraphy .
The
i dea
o f
a rchitectural
r emains
o r
o ther
p lain ,
t he c haracter o f
t hey
a re
s ites
o f
f inds
n ot
s upported
e phemeral
i s
b y
f irmly
c haracter
v ery u nusual .
I n
b ased
without
t he
C ilician
t he middle c halcolithic i s b etter d efined
s ince
i t i s s tratigraphically r epresented b y t he s ite o f Mersin ( XIX-XVII) ( Garstang, 1 953: 1 01). I t i s i nteresting t o note t hat, u nlike t he K onya p lain, t his p hase f unctions a s a p relude t o t he f ull a ppearance o f t he n ew l ate c halcolithic c ulture ( level XVI) which s eems t o o riginate
i n t he A natolian p lateau ( Mellaart,
T he e xtent o f
I f i ndeed t he
p hase
f rom E lmali p lain i s d oubtful. s equence where
t he
l ike
t hen
o ne
l ate c halcolithic s eems
(Mellaart, t he whole
s ometimes
b e
t he
I n t he c ase,
1 975:
1 5),
c halcolithic i ncreases c onsiderably . a s h as
i s
l ate chalcolithic
1
f ollows H acilar I w ith a g ap o f o nly s ome d ecades t hen t he
e xistence o f a n i ntermediary
t o a ttribute
i t
w ith t he c ommencement a nd t he d uration o f t he l ate
c halcolithic p eriod i n Anatolia .
millennium
1 01).
t he middle c halcolithic p hase i s n ot c lear a nd
o bviously a ssociated p hase a lmost
1 966:
the
s uggested h owever,
t o
l ife
N onetheless
b y
t he
f inds
o f t he Mersin
b e n earer
t o t he
t he
4 th
s pan
o f
middle
i t i s
c ertainly w rong
l ate c halcolithic s equence t o t he 4 th m illennium
b een s uggested ( Menlink,
1 977:
2 92),
s ince
t here
will
a b ig gap i n t he f ifth millennium e specially i n c ulturally
a ctive a reas
l ike
s outh-west A natolia.
113
I t i s more l ikely t hat i f a n a ctual g ap i s f ound t o e xist i n t he Anatolian s equence s omewhere around 4 ,500 B .C . i t would n ot b e b ig enough t o a ccommodate a s eparate p hase l ike t he o ne s uggested b y t he middle c halcolithic p eriod. This i s t rue i n C an H asan where t he western A natolian l ate c halcolithic t radition ( Can H asan I ) a ppeared n ot very l ong a fter t he a bandonment o f t he 2A5 b uilding l evel .
Even
more s ignificant a re t he r esults o f r ecent e xcavations a t Kurucay H üyük i n t he Burdur a rea where t he l ate c halcolithic f ollows t he early c halcolithic w ithout 7 .4.
a b reak ( Duru 1 980:
2 24,
1 981:
9 5).
The e arly c halcolithic c ultures o f A natolia: S outh-western A natolia
a nd
t he K onya p lain a re t he g eographical
r egions where t he s o-called e arly c halcolithic c ultures f lourished, within t he
b road n eolithic f ramework .
I n m any ways t hey a re c onsidered
a c ontinuation o f t he l ong-established n eolithic t radition which i s b ased o n s ettled l ife i n v illages with mixed e conomy a nd p ottery manufacturing . T he d istribution o f t hese a gricultural c ommunities h as b een
e xplained
b y
e nvironmental
r easons,
e ither
o f
v egetation
1 964: 5 43) or o f t he d egree o f r ainfall ( Raikes, 1 967: 1 19).
( Butzer , H owever,
t here i s n o r eal c ultural c hange b etween t he l ate n eolithic p eriod a nd t he s ucceeding early c halcolithic i n a ll o f t he s ites where a n u ninterrupted s equence d oes e xist. I n H acilar e arly
t he
l ate n eolithic
chalcolithic
( V-I)
l evels
o ccupation
( IX-VI) were
without
f ollowed
t races
o f
b y
t he
e xternal
i nfluences. T he p eriod was c learly t he r esult o f a c ontinuous d evelopment f rom l evel I X o nwards, a f act which j ustifies t he a lmost a rbitrary d ivision 1 970) .
b etween
F or,
( Bialor,
a part
1 962:
l ate
n eolithic
f rom
t he e conomy ( Helbaek ,
6 7)
which
d id
a ppearance o f
a n ew f eature,
s udden
most
s ince
c ontinue
t o
o f
t he
a nd
n ot
e arly
c hange
c halcolithic 1 970 :
s ignificantly,
t he E arly P ainted p ottery ,
s hapes
o f
t he
( Mellaart,
1 89) a nd t echnology e ven
was n ot
t he
a t
a ll
p receding monochrome wares
b e e mployed.
The d evelopments i n t he Konya p lain a re s imilar, i n t he two r epresentative s ites o f ç atal H üyük W est ( Mellaart, 1 965: 1 35) a nd C an Hasan
( French,
a lthough
t he
i nadequate. c ommon a nd o f
1 962:
2 7,
1 963:
i nformation
2 9,
1 964:
a vailable
I n b oth c ases
t he
1 25,
f rom
p ainted
a lthough minor d ifferences
s trong
e vidence o f a c hronological C halcolithic
Hasan
2B,
a date
I I
1 965:
c ultures
l imited,
s ince
t here
i s
1 54).
n o
I ts
g eographical
to
C ilicia,
o f
s omewhere
( Mellaart, i s
Ware
e xist s uch a s
r eport
o n
f rom
t he
t he
e conomy
h owever ,
naturally
Explorations i n t he Göksu valley, h ave n ot
t he
1 65), t o
o n have
b e
t he
u se
o r a bsence
p ottery i s c onsidered a s
W est t urn
i s
t wo
c ontemporary
o f
t he
6 th
s ites: t o
important p racticed
t he
r oute
s ite b y
f rom
a ttracted
o f
t he
C an
t he
H asan ,
i nhabitants.
t he K onya
early
C an
millennium
I nformation c oncerning o ther a spects o f
e specially
p osition ,
would
1 967B: s eems
r elation b etween t he
9 ata1 H üyük a round
8 7,
l atter
r ed-on-white wares a re v ery
c ertain s hapes a nd d ecorative p atterns,
E arly
1 965:
t he
p lain
s ettlers.
t he o nly r oad t hrough t he Taurus,
p rovided d efinite n eolithic o r c halcolithic material a ccording
t o F rench ( 1965: 1 77) a lthough n eolithic d ark b urnished wares a nd a f ew p ainted p ieces a re r eported b y M ellaart ( 1954: 1 86) . I mports, h owever, f rom Mersin ( XXI-XX) t o C an Hasan 2B ( Mellaart,
114
1 963) i ndicate
s ome
s ort
o f
c ommunication
c hronology f or I ndeed
b etween
t he
t he c orresponding
t he
e arly
t wo
a reas
a nd
e stablish
a r elative
l evels.
c halcolithic
o t
Mersin
( XXIV-XX) s hows
c lose
r esemblances t o d evelopments i n t he Anatolian p lateau, a s imilarity which i s a lready e vident
i n
t he p revious p eriod a nd which w ill c ontinue
i nto t he l ate chalcolithic .
Whether o r n ot t his e arly c halcolithic
p hase
i n
M ersin
i s
i nfluenced
H alaf
a s
f ar
t he
p ainted
Halaf
a s
imports
( Mellaart,
1 981:
o rientation o f 1 975,
d o
b y
t he
p ottery
s outhern
i s
n ot
s tart
t ill
1 48).
I t
s eems,
c ultures
c oncerned,
l evel
XIX
i s
and
h owever,
o f
n ot
H assuna a nd
c lear .
s top
i n
p robable
E arly
l evel
t hat
XVI
s uch
a n
M ersin d uring e arly c halcolithic was u nlikely ( Mellaart,
1 26).
7 .5 T he l ate c halcolithic c ultures: Whether
o r
n ot
i n s ome r egions
t he s o-called
was a t ransition p eriod b etween t he o ld e arly l ate c halcolithic c ultures
( Mellaart,
1 966),
' middle
c halcolithic '
c halcolithic
i t d oes n ot
a nd
t he
n ew
a lter t he f act
t hat a noticeable c hange t ook p lace i n Anatolia i n t he f irst half o f t he 5 th millennium .
G eographically ,
t his n ew
t radition i s n ot
t o o ne r egion .
I t h as b een f ound o n t he A natolian p lateau ,
l imited
i n
while
s cale,
i slands ( Lemnos, The
C ilicia
i n t he a reas o f
s ite
o f
i nformation
( Mersin XVI)
t he
C hios,
A natolia I b)
( Beycesultan),
a nd
t he
B eycesultan
i s,
h owever,
t he
s ource
o f
was
f rom
t he
e xternal
e stablished
t he e arlier c ulture .
e astern
most
c oncerning t he n ew c ulture ( Lloyd - M ellaart,
j udging
c ulture
S .W .
( Kum T epe
S amos) c omparable c ultures h ave b een f ound.
A fter t he neolithic s equence l east
a nd
north-west
c onfined
t hough i n a
i n
t he
o f
A natolia
i t
c haracteristics,
a rea ,
which
s eems t hat
d iffered
o f
t he
1 962). c ertain,
a n ew
c onsiderably
N ew c eramic wares w ere i ntroduced,
a t
material f rom
which d iffered
i n t heir a ppearance - d ark s lipped s urfaces - and i n t heir method o f manufacture p ractices
- s traw-tempered
( Garstang,
( Mellaart,
1 978:
d ifferent
8 6).
material
c ulture.
F or,
1 953: I t
c haracteristics
i s
i t
h owever,
e qually
r eal
c ommunal
( Mellaart,
l ife
1 975);
t he
a lthough p oor had n ot Whether t he
c hange,
i nnovations What
i s
must
h ave
l ost
o r
n ot
o r
a n ew
which
c ertain, b een
and
t he
c hipped i ts
f oreign
p roduced
t hat h ad
i ndustry
e lements
o verlap
t he e arly l ate
o f
no
t he s et
new o f
fundamental b een
c ommon
( obsidian,
l ong
c hert)
t he u se o f m etal.
w ere
r esponsible
r esulted
t raditions,
s omewhere
o f n ew
A mixed e conomy was t he
Anatolia
c eramic
t hat
a c hronological
What i s s triking,
i n
c hanged
s trikingly
nature
t rue
metals
s tone
p opulation
n ew i s
o f
t hese
a whole
p opularity b ecause
t radition
h owever ,
e arly c halcolithic a nd
u se
b uilding
a lso
t hat
e conomic o r t echnological c hange o ccurred. b asis o f
existing
c ustoms t hat
t he
o bvious
i s
t he
b urial
overshadow
i t
a ppeared,
- while
and
s eems,
r emains
a lthough
c lay
1 31)
i s
n ot
i n n orther
b etween
t he
i n
e asy t o s ay .
A natolia
l ast
f or
t echnical
s tages
t here o f
t he
c halcolithic p eriod.
o n t he o ther h and,
i s t he " inferiority" o f t he
p revailing p ottery r epertoire c ompared t o t he d isappearing e arly chalcolitnic painted wares, and the wide d istribution o f t he c haracteristics which a re c onsidered
1 15
a s
l ate
c halcolithic
o ver
g reat
p arts o f A natolia ( Todd, 1 980 : 3 9) . M oreover, t he c onsiderable l ength o f t he p eriod - a t l east twenty b uilding l evels a t B eycesultan - and i ts
s ubdivisions
c ertainly d o n ot
p erhaps d uring t he t o
t he
b etray a ny t ransitional n ature e xcept
l atest p hases,
which
c an
I n g eneral t erms t he c haracter o f r emains
o bscure
( Mellaart,
a s
1 978:
c haracteristic
t ar
8 4).
a s
i ts
f eatures
o ver
most
l ate
s een a s
a n
i ntroduction
i s
s een
i n
t he
c halcolithic
p eriod
t he
i t s eems
c ontext
o f
l ate
a nd
c halcolithic p eriod
e xtent
wide
a re
c oncerned
d istribution
o f
i ts
o f A natolia e specially t owards
e arlier material i n t hese a reas
f eatures
t he
o rigin
N evertheless
A egean c oast i s v ery i mportant; o f
b e
i mpressive b ut d iverse e arly b ronze c ultures.
t o c ompensate
( Hood,
1 981).
a c ontinuous
may well
f or t he
I f
t he
p aucity
t his s pread o f
c ultural
p rocess ,
t he
b e s een t o i nitiate a p attern o f
c ontacts b etween d ifferent r egions o n a s cale which was u nknown b efore ; s uch i s
t he e vidence p rovided
f rom
b oth c oasts o f
t he A egean d uring t he
f inal Greek n eolithic and t he Anatolian l ate c halcolithic ( Renfrew, 1 972: 7 .6.
7 6). C ultural a reas o f n orth-western A natolia a nd P ottery g roups: B ecause o f
t he
v ery
l imited
n umber
o f
e xcavations
outside t he a rea o f t he Anatolian p lateau, p hases i s o nly s hown
b y t he d istribution o f
t ypes of p ottery a nd o ther a rtefacts. s urface c ollections
and
h istory o f
H owever ,
t he a rea .
c an g ive
must
b e
s tressed
m isinterpretation
t hat
b ecause
s ites,
i ndividual f eatures
s uch a s
o nly a v ague
i dea o f
t he
c ultural
t hey d o p rovide a g eneral f ramework w ith
t he o f
e arly
Most o f t hese f inds c ome f rom
c hronological r eferences b ased o n t ypological I t
o f
t he e xistence o f c ultural
d ata
t he
and
a vailable
l ack
o f
s tylistic
i s
c riteria.
f requently o pen
a dequate
s tratigraphy a nd
t o t he
oversimplifications which a rise f rom t he u njustified c omparison o f i ndividual
f eatures
such
a s
s hapes
and
d ecoration
f rom
d ifferent
t he 5 th m illennia i n w estern A natolia,
e specially
g eographical r egions. T he
l ate 6 th a nd
t he c oastal a reas, b een
c arried
a re v ery f ragmentarily
o ut
c onsiderations
i n
a nd
many
p laces,
c oncentrating
i n
r epresented .
b ased
p rimarily
a reas
which
w ere
t hen
c lassified
a ccording
s equence
e lsewhere,
p eriod o f
t he s ites .
d istribution Hacilar
t radition
n eolithic 1 9678) .
a nd
I f,
n orth-west i nstead
p attern
a t
a ll,
l east
r epresented 1 980:
o f i s
i n
b y
a lready
t he
c haracteristic
t he
main
a s
h as
e stablished i dea
f or
l ike
t he i s
t he
t ypological o ccupation
c oncerned p ottery
p ostulating
o f a
t he t he l ate
t he
i t
l ooks
e arly
t hose
t o t he n orth a nd
( Mellaart,
t radition continued,
p ainted wares
o f
d id n ot s pread
b een s uggested
A natolia
l inked
p eriod i n western A natolia ( French ,
i s u ndermined ;
c entral
h ave
r ed-on-cream
c riterion
h ave
g eographical
T he s urface f inds
t he e arly c halcolithic
t he p ainted wares
monochrome
H acilar t ype p ottery t hat a t
A s f ar a s
t he
o nly a r ough
p re l ate c halcolithic
h owever ,
t he
t o
p roducing
o n
must
r egion o f s outh-western A natolia with t he c oast.
S urveys
t hen
c ertain ,
1 970:
t he
i n t his
c halcolithic
1 46)
value
o f
b ut the
r espect,
p eriod
i s
n ot
f ound i n t he K onya p lain ( Todd,
4 5). I ndeed
d evelopment
t he i n
p ossibility
o f
a l ocal
western A natolia must
1 16
a nd
q uite
i ndependent
c ultural
b e t aken s eriously i n v iew
o f
t he
f act
t hat
t he
l ate
c halcolithic
p eriod
p roduced
material
which
d ifferentiated f rom t he t raditional s outh-western Anatolian ( French,
1 971:
I n p eriod I t f or
i s
a re
much
defining
K um
r egional
p laced
o r
i ts 1 962:
r eal
l ate
c alled
t he l ate c halcolithic
A natolia
( French ,
s ubphases,
i f
7 1),
p ottery .
c ultural
e xcavations
B e9ikatepe)
e arly
b ronze
h ave
a ge
i s
t he
t erms
o f
t he
1 969:
7 5),
C onsiderable
t ypical
c arinated
o f
b owl,
p ottery,
on
the
t he
a nd
p ainted t echnique. t he
o f
u seful
a nd t he
C eramic may
t he
material
o ften
s econdly
o n
t he
d ecoration ,
b e
p lain
o f
r eference
t heir
a pparent
which
c orresponds
t herefore,
A natolian
i s
g roups
T roadic
p oints
d espite
importance,
s outh-western
h as
o nly b een
which h ave b een
s equence, s uch
a s
s uch t he
a s
white
O ther c riteria, s uch a s t he s urface t reatment o f
a re m ore d ifficult
I nvestigations same
9 9) .
a d ivision
t heir value
m ounds
p rovided
p eriods
s uch
f irst o f a ll o n t he o ccurrence o f c ertain s hapes a s
1 961:
c halcolithic p hases e stablished a t B eycesultan i s
r epresented.
a ccepted t he
i n t he
i s
t hat o nce a gain t he o nly material a vailable
l imitations ( French ,
t o t he f our p oorly
b ut
T epe,
p re
what
western
p eriod
A lthough
t he
o f i n
- M ellaart,
important
( Troy ,
e vidence p lentiful
h owever ,
t he
( Lloyd
l imited . f or
t he
more
r egrettable,
p ossible
b e
6 6).
c ontrast, i s
c an
t ypology
i n
t he
t o d efine.
e astern
methodological
A egean
l ines.
i slands B ecause
h ave
b een
t here
c onducted
i s
s o
much
u nstratified material most o f t he c omparative o bservations a re b ased o n s tylistic s pecific o f
c riteria
c haracter
h andles).
T he
e xcavations s equence o f
b y
( Furness,
t han
t hose
r ecent
1 81),
( 1981)
t he
i slands
t ried b ut
t o
a lso
t hough t hese a re o f a more
i n
p ublication
H ood
b etween
1 956:
employed
western A natolia
o f
t he
c larify
Emborio n ot
only
t heir r elations
( e .g .
t ypes
a nd
A g.
t he
c ultural
G ala
w ith b oth c oasts
t he A egean.
7 .6.1.
N orth-western A natolia:
I n g eneral t erms, t he a rea o f n orth-western Anatolia, i ncluding t he e astern i slands, c ould b e c onsidered b etween t he g eographical r egions o f G reece,
a s t he p lace o f c ontact t he s outh B alkans a nd t he
c ultures o f t he A natolian p lateau . T he a reas which h ave s o t ar b een i nvestigated i n n orth-western A natolia a re t he Marmara r egion a round t he l ake I znik ( Mellaart, o f
1 955: 8 0, F rench,
B alikesir a nd A khisar-Manisa
( French,
The Marmara r egion i s o ne o f g reat
1 967B: 4 9) and t he r egion
1 969:
4 1).
s ignificance
b ecause
position b et ween t he s ea and t he p lateau, s erving c ommunication r oute f rom Anatolia t o s outh-east E urope t hroughout
much
o f
t he
p rehistoric
p eriod
( Mellaart,
o f
i ts
a lso a s a a nd Thrace 1 971:
1 19).
E vidence, h owever , o f e arly h abitation i s v ery r are a nd, a part f rom o ne p iece o f p otLery w ith i mpressed f inger n ail d ecoration f rom I licapinar , which h as
b een c ompared
t o s imilar T hessalian f inds ( French ,
F ig . 1 3:12), n o p ainted s herds a re r eported f rom t he I negöl r egion . M ellaart r eports a p ainted s herd ( matt l i kurhisar,
p robably o f a n e arly c halcolithic d ate
H owever , F rench a s
t here a re
b elonging t o
s ome e arly wares
1 967B :
4 9,
I znik-Yeni9ehirr ed-on-red) f rom
( 1955:
7 5).
which h ave b een i dentified
b y
t he 6 th millennium b ecause o f t heir s imilarities
1 17
t o l he Hacilar 1 X-VII p ottery. t ar
f rom c ertain ;
( 1964:
1 7)
a nd
m illennium
d ate
a s
Pale-dark
l imited
T odd i s
i s
v ery
B urnished
o f
t he
( 1980:
p robable . a nd
T hey
F ikirtepe
a round
P ale-dark
t hese wares i s, h owever,
c onsiders
s ceptical
d istribution
c omparison
T he d ate o f
a lthough M ellaart
t he
a s
i t
e arly n eolithic
s eems
t hat
h ave
b een
d escribed
t ypes
a nd
t hey s eem
l ake
B urnished
t hem
1 27)
o f
w are
I znik w ith
( Fig .
t he
a 6 th
b y
F rench
t o
h ave a
8 1).
H acilar
T he
material
h as b een b ased o n t he s hape o f t he h ole mouth j ar ( French, 1 967B, F ig. 1 1:17-36)
while
t he
F ikirtepe p ottery a ppears
t o h ave l ess d irect
with any o f t he early f inds o f t he Anatolian p lateau ( 1967B, 3 9).
I n f act,
j udge
f rom
a n
i t
s eems
t hat
e xamination
i ts d istinctiveness,
o f
t he
B ritish I nstitute a t Ankara, p ottery .
Many
a spects
o f
f ew
s amples
i n
a s
t he
l inks
F ig. 3 8,
t ar a s
I c ould
c ollection o f
t he
n ature
o f
t he
F ikirtepe
p ottery,
i ncluding i ts d istribution a round t he a rea o f I zmit ( Mellaart, 5 6)
a re s till A s
o bscure
f ar a s
i t
f alls
( Bittel,
i n t he I znik a rea ,
w ell within t he
l ate
1 955:
1 969-1970).
t he B lack B urnished p ottery ( French,
b y s urface f inds
t he
i s d ue t o t he s urface t reatment o f t he
i s
c oncerned
1 967B :
t here
5 7),
d e 'ined
i s n o d oubt
c halcolithic p hases o f A natolia .
t hat
I t
i s
a
h andmade ware a nd t he c olour o f t he s urface varies f rom r ed t o ! qack with
n o
t races
o f
s lip.
c arinated b owls ( 1967B , B eycesultan
the
I ts
F ig .
main
f eature
i s
t he
1 2:16-19) which a re a lso
r epertoire
( Lloyd - Mellaart,
u se
o f
o per
a nd
c haracteristfc
1 962:
1 00,
F ig.
o f
n 12).
T he variety o f t ne b owls employed i n t he B lack B urnished wa e - k owls with f lat r ims a nd c urving s ides - may i ndicate t hat a ll f our p hases o f l ate c halcolithic a re r epresented, a lthough t he absence o f white p ainted p ottery, which b ecomes c ommon i n B eycesultan f rom X XXIV l evel o nwards,
i s n oticeable.
T he
s urface
material
f rom
t he
Marmara
a rea,
t hough
i t
g ives
s ome
h ints o f p ossible c ontacts with o ther r egions, i s f ar f rom p roviding r eliable
i nformation .
E specially
a s
f ar
a s
t he
e arly p eriods
c oncerned t he p ottery i s very f ragmentary and c omes n umber o f i s
s ites .
k nown o nly
T he
f rom
m aterial o f
s urface
B alikesir ,
c ollections
a re
f rom a l imited
A khisar a nd Manisa r egions
( French ,
1 969:
4 1) .
H e
r eports
only o ne v ery small r ed-on-cream p ainted p iece o f a b owl o f c ertain e arly date f rom t he s ite o f Morali I ( 1965: 2 0, F ig. 5 :4) ( Fig. 8 0); t he date o f s ome more p ainted s herds, r eported b y o thers ( Biernoff, 1 967: 9 6, F ig. 1 1) i s not c ertain . H ood c onsiders a f ragment o f p ainted
r ed-on-white
s herd
f ound
i n
t he L ower
c ave
o f
A gio G ala ( 1981:
2 1, F ig. 7 :49) t o b e an import e ither f rom S esklo o r Anatolia; f rom
t he d ifferent o pinions e xpressed a s
1 26,
F rench ,
1 969 :
a s a n i mport . 1 o f
5 8)
i t
i s
important
S tratigraphically i t
t he L ower c ave
i s n ot
t o
t hat
c annot
h omogeneous
i t
i s
b e d efined s ince t he
( Hood,
1 981:
with
f ine
o f
a n early d ate ( French,
b urnished
d ifferent c olours.
s urface
c overed
1 965: with
1 8).
h orizon
7 8).
i t
a t hick
A lthough t he b owls a nd jars
1 971:
u nanimously a ccepted
A r ather d ifficult t o d efine P lain B urnished ware, c onsidered
a part
i ts o rigin ( Mellaart,
h owever,
i ncludes wash
o r
i s
s herds s lip
i ndicate a p re
o f
l ate
c halcolithic date t he material i s t oo f ar f rom b eing h omogeneous t o p ermit
c omparisons
with
o ther
r egions;
f or
e xample
t he
s mall
r aised
b ase c annot b e c onvincingly c ompared t o s imilar f eatures a t H acilar.
1 18
Another
e arly
f ound
a t
f ive
1 969,
F ig. 2 ).
ware,
s ites
k nown
( mounds)
a s P lain B urnished p ottery h as
a long
t he
L ate c halcolithic B eycesultan
b een f ound i n t he s ame a rea a lthough i t
i s
t ype
o f
p ottery h as a lso
c ourse l ess
p lentiful
t han i n t he r egion o f s outh-western Anatolia ( French, 1 961: 1 ) .
T he
t ypical
s hape
i s
t he
s hallow
b een
l ower G ediz valley ( French,
b owl
w ith
f laring
1 01, F ig.
c oncave
s ides
o ften d ecorated w ith w hite p aint. The
B lack
B urnished
wares
i ndicate a w ide d istribution o f B eycesultan A natolia .
r egion
t he
l owlands
I t a ppears t hat
d etailed
t ypological
s equence
b oth a reas,
t hese
a nd
f inds
c oastal a re
c lassification
e stablished
c hronological 1 03)
t o
f rom
l ate c halcolithic
s equence
for
f or
o f
d ifferent
a reas
s ufficient and
I t
h owever,
b e
s tressed,
f or
o f
s tylistic
i solated
a n e xcavated
t hat
s ite,
c riteria
u ntil
b e
p ermit t o
a more
provide
( French ,
a
1 961:
t he p re T roy p hases.
a s ound
c onclusions
must
t o
thus
l ate c halcolithic u ntil
must
n orth-western
p ottery g roups
f rom t he b eginning o f
e stablished
t he
o f
t he material a ccording t o t he
Beycesultan
t he
which a re s imilar,
t ype p ottery f rom
b ased
s tratigraphy
o n
t he
i s
c omparison
t reated w ith c aution e specially
where w e a re c oncerned w ith a r egional s equence. 7 .6.2.
E astern A egean I slands:
F rom f rom
t he
o ld
i slands
o f
e xcavations,
Kalymnos,
K os).
i mportant,
T he
b ecause
t he e astern A egean w e h ave a vailable m aterial
which f ew
t hey
a re
mostly
p ublished
p rovide
without
s tratification
e xcavations
t he
a re
s tratigraphical
( Samos,
t herefore very
a nd
c hronological
b asis f or t he s tudy o f t he p rehistorical material s cattered o ver t he i slands . Thermi
While
t he e xcavations a t P oliochni i n L emnos ( Brea ,
i n L esbos
i nformation
f or
( Lamb, t he
important material r ecently
b een p ut
e vidence
o f
t he
1 936)
b ronze f rom
i n
i ts
a ge
p roper i s
S ome
o f A g.
and
i ts
G ala
p erspective
v ery
r estriction i n o ur i nformation , p icture o f
s equence
t he s ites
p ottery
1 964) a nd
l ong a go p rovided a c ertain amount o f
( Hood,
l imited,
p re-phases,
t he
a nd Emborio h as o nly 1 98 0 .
t here
which must a ffect
i s
o ur
B ecause
t he
a q ualitative
o verall
c ultural
t heir
r egional
t he a rea. c eramic
f eatures,
h owever,
b ecause
o f
d istribution, may, with c areful c lassification, b e a ble t o p rovide a c hronological d ecoration
d imension
a nd
t he
f or
b owl
t he with
a rea .
T hese
r ims
r egrettably b e t he o nly b asis f or s equence f or t he e astern A egean
a re
c urving
t he
p atterned-burnish
inwards.
T his
will
t he a ttempt t o c onstruct a c ultural i slands, and f or a ssessing t heir
p osition w ithin a w ider c ontext. E ven b efore s ites
i t
was
t he
c lear
f inal
f rom
p ublication o f
p reliminary
r eports
t he
A g.
( Hood,
G ala 1 965)
a nd Emborio t hat
most
o f
t heir material was o f a n e arly d ate , n ot o nly i n r elation t o t he o ther e astern i slands b ut a lso i n t he wider A egean c ontext ( Renfrew, 1 972, Table
5 :1).
Anatolian
A l ot l ate
o f A egean
c halcolithic
l ate
n eolithic e lements
f eatures
have
b een
t ogether with
i dentified
i n
material f rom t he i slands o f S amos, Kos a nd Kalymnos ( Furness, L loyd-Mellaart, R hodes
( Sampson,
1 962)
while
1 979).
I n
r ecently t he
w ider
1 19
s imilar c ontext
f inds o f
were
r eported
t he
1 956, f rom
t he A egean n eolithic ,
t he
c ultural
p osition
o f
t he
e astern
i slands
i s
n ot
c lear a s
w e
s hall
s ee f urther b elow. A s
f ar
a s
t he
r elation
E mborio i s c oncerned, which s uggests
t hat
U pper c ave o f A .
b etween
t here s eems
t he
t o
b e
t he L ower c ave a nd
G ala ( horizon
material
a c lear
f rom Ag.
G ala a nd
c hronological
s equence
t he l ower g roup o f l evels i n t he
1 -2) was
c ontemporary o r o verlapped
w ith
Emborio X-IX and t hat t he u pper l evels o f t he Upper c ave ( horizon 3 ) a lso o verlapped
w ith Emborio,
V II-VI
( fine
b lack
white p ainted d ecoration) ( Hood, 1 981: 7 7). A g .
G ala
m aterial
Emborio V III
( horizon
1 -2)
i s
j ustifiably
s ince n either p attern
b urnished
s herds
c onsidered
e arlier
b owls w ith s hort
t han
b urnish p ottery ( Emborio VIII -
B e9ikatepe) n or v ases with i nward c uring r ims ( Emborio V II-VI, I b) were f ound ;
w ith
I n o ther words t he e arly
K um T epe
c arinated r ims ( Emborio V -IV,
T roy I )
a re a lso a bsent. I t
i s
wiser,
c riteria f or s ites t ype
o f
C hios
( Hood,
I b elieve ,
t o a void
t he a ttempt
t o e stablish s pecific
t racing even c loser a ffinities e ither o r
w ith o ther
1 981:
3 1,
F ig.
r egions .
S ix
1 6:54-55)
r eject a c ultural c ontemporaneity .
are
b owl n ot
b etween
r ims
o f
t he
two
a d istinctive
a dequate
t o
d efine
o r
E ven t he t ypical h orned h andles
with such a wide a nd meaningful d istribution i n t he e astern Aegean c annot
b e
l imited s eems
c onsidered
i n
t o
n umber
b e
t echniques,
a s
d isagreement s uch a s
t he
( Emborio - B e9ikatepe) 7 .7.
I nterregional S ince
a s ecure
( Emborio
t he
V I
a s
c riterion
- A g .
t o
when
G ala :
t heir o ccurrence i s
h orizon
3 ) .
Moreover
s o
t here
t he c omparability o f c ertain d ecorative
p attern
b urnish
( Renfrew,
1 972:
ware,
b etween
d ifferent
s een
t he
s ites
7 5).
r elationships:
e arly
p ainted
p ottery
h as
b een
a s
h allmark o f
t he main c ulture o f t he Anatolian p lateau during t he 6 th a nd part o f t he 5 th millennium, i t i s n atural t o s ee i n i ts d istribution c onsiderable s ignificance f or t he c ultural c ontacts b etween t he d ifferent
r egions .
P ainted
p ottery
o f
H acilar
I V-II
o r
I ,
E .Ch .
I a nd
I I wares f rom 9 atal Hüyük West a nd C an Hasan have b een f ound i n many s ites
o ver
s outh-west
A natolia ,
i n
a s trong
p ainted H acilar
1 970 :
r egional
wares
o f
t he
4 37) .
I t
c haracter
Konya
p lain
t ype p ottery w as f ound
i s
i nteresting,
a pplies and
s herds
t o
t he
were
While,
t he s ucceeding H acilar I ware h ad a w ider d istribution i n
r egion ( Mellaart,
p ainted
q uantities .
i n D ereköy I , t hat
a nd K uru ay
v arying
H acilar
t he
I V-II
t hough
f or i nstance,
h owever ,
s pread
s outh-western
i n 9 atal H üyük W est
f ound
o f
o nly
t o
n ote
a ll
t he
Anatolia;
n o
o r v ice v ersa.
The s triking Hacilar I c eramics, a part f rom whether o r not t hey evolved f rom t he p revious t radition ( V-I) a ppear t o b e c oncentrated a round and
t he s ingle
C an
H asan
t ype-site .
2 B
wares,
d ifficult t o e stablish ; a ctual
e vidence
o f
T he
f or
s ame
which
a pplies
t o
t he
a d istribution
9 atal H üyük
W est
p attern
v ery
i s
even b etween t he main c ultural c entres t he
c ontacts
i s
v ery
r are
( Mellaart,
1 965:
1 54) .
T here
i s l imited p ainted material f ound i n t he w estern a nd c oastal r egions A natolia s ince g eneral T he
t erms l ack
t he r ed-on-white p ieces r esemble o f
o f
r eported f rom t here o nly i n v ery
t he d istinctive H acilar I w are.
p ainted
p ottery
c an
1 20
c ertainly
b e
mainly a ttributed
t o
i nadequate e xploration i n t he a rea .
H owever,
v ery s canty i n t he Anatolian p lateau a s work h as
p ainted p ottery was manufactured B urdur ,
s imilar material i s
where a l ot
o f s urvey
i f i s b ound t o b e s uggested t hat t he impressive
b een d one,
a l imited a rea ;
s ince
well,
i n a f ew
c entres
a nd
d istributed
o nly r ecent e xcavations a t Kuru ay H üyük ,
o ver
n ear t he l ake
h ave y ielded e arly c halcolithic p ainted p ottery o f H acilar V -II
and I t ype,
b elow t he l ate chalcolithic l evels ( Duru 1 981:
1 95).
T he
c oncentration o f p ainted wares i n s ome s ites might b e r elated t o t he e xceptional
n ature
o f
t hese
monumental f eatures .
s ites,
a nd
e specially H acilar
I ,
w ith
i ts
I t d oes n ot n ecessarily mean t hat p ainted p ottery
had a d istinctive f unction i n t he c ommunity o r a s pecial p urpose f or i ts e xistence . r epresent
S ince t he H acilar V I
t he
b ulk
o f
t he
c eramic
t ype monochrome wares c ontinued t o
material - i n H acilar V I
p ottery was o nly 1 0% - i t may well b e t he c ase c onsidered e ither
a l uxury
w ithin
d istribution
t he o f
p roduct
a nd
t hat
o r
among
c ommunity
t he
p ainted
p ottery
i t
h ad
t he
a r estricted
v illages .
i tself
t he p ainted
t hat p ainted p ottery was
makes
c irculation ,
T hus
i t
t he
l imited
i mpossible
t o u se
i t a s an indication o f i nterregional c ontacts within Anatolia .
The
l ack o f e xcavations which c ould p resent a c onclusive p icture o f t he d ifferent
cultures
r egrettably
s cattered
s ubstituted
b y
i n
t he
t he
u se
western
o f
c riteria
p art which
o f
Anatolia
i s
a re
s tretched
t o
a ccommodate c omplex c ultural f unctions . T he
a cknowledgment
u sually
p layed
f ramework;
d own
t he
o f
i n
t he
t he
l imited v alue o f
d esire
implications
s erious
i naccuracy .
T here
s imply
e stablishing
t he
i s,
o f
f or
s uch
h owever ,
p resence
s ome
o f
t he s urface p ottery i s s ort
a p rocess
o f
a j ustifiable
t he
p ainted
c hronological
s ometimes
wares
i n
i n
t he
which must h ave p layed a n important r ole a s f ar a s c ontacts and t he B alkans a re c oncerned.
l ead
i nterest
t o
e ven
r egions,
w ith G reece
F or i f t here was a westwards o r v ice
v ersa movement o f c ultural t raits
i n t he A egean ,
t he p aucity o f p ainted
p ottery i n t he i slands and t he western c oast o f Anatolia p resents a c onsiderable c hallenge ( French, existence o f G reece
a nd
l ack o f o ut
a " contact
1 965).
I n p roper c ultural t erms t he
z one" b etween t he p ainted t radition o f b oth
t he A natolian
p lateau
i n
s imilar c haracteristics,
t he
5 th millennium,
would b e u nusual .
T he
with
i n t he n orth-western Anatolian r egion ( Mellaart,
1 969),
t he E lmali
Rhodes
( Sampson,
p lain 1 979)
i n
t he
s outh and
and
t he
i nvestigations
c omplete
s urveys c arried 1 955,
French,
t he r ecent excavations i n i n Karpathos
( Melas
p .c.), h ave c overed a ll t he p ossible c ommunication r outes b etween Greece and Anatolia . A ll e fforts, h owever, f ailed t o r eveal p ainted p ottery. g reat
S o,
e xtent
a ssuming
t he a bsence o f w e s hall
t hat
r epresentative
o ur
o f
p resent
t he
r eal
s tate o f k nowledge
c ultural
h istory
o f
i s
t he
t o a a rea ,
p ainted wares may i nitiate d ifferent i nterpretations,
s ee i n
a s
s ection 8 .
The late chalcolithic wares s ee m t o have a more easily r ecognizable p attern o f d istribution o ver t he n orth-western A natolian and
c oastal
c ollections b etween
l ate
a n
Anatolian
u nlike
s ubdivisions
A lthough most
t hey g ive
t he
Moreover, the
r egions.
b ased
t he o n
o f
p lateau
t he
t he f inds
p revailing
t he
p ainted
B eycesultan
p ottery,
o f
t he
a nd
p receding
c halcolithic
s ignificance.
i dea
western wares
s equence
which
have
c ome
f rom s urface
cultural r egions
a number
c an
b e
c lear
c ontacts ( Fig.
o f
8 2).
p recise
e stablished
f or
chronological
C riteria s uch a s t he d ecoration ( white p aint) and t he
1 21
s hapes
( carinated
c onsidered t he
s ite
b owls)
s tronger o f
a re
e qually
e vidence
B eycesultän
( Lloyd
i tself
i mportant
a lthough
- M ellaart,
a n umber o f
1 962: o ther
t he
7 7) .
l atter A part
mounds
i n
s outh-
western Anatolia and t he Konya p lain h ave p roduced e vidence o f c halcolithic
c ulture .
R egrettably
i n
f rom t he c aves i s not i nformative. g eographically important u seful
( Mellaart,
1 954:
T he b ulk o f f inds
o f
( strap,
t ype-site
a s trict
c ertain
w ith a nd
o f
n ot
a s
B eycesultan.
decoration
A natolia , d irectly
I n
i slands
a ny c omparative
c hronological
c ommon
1 98)
Thessaly
i n
o ccur
S amos,
i n
a nd
a t
t he t he
i n
1 908:
c ultural
c ase
( Heurtley,
2 57,
F ig.
a nd A g.
a s
The
h orned
( Furness,
F ig.
a s
white
t hey d o n ot
G ala
1 59,
well
t o t he
which
( pointillg,
1 939:
1 80)
o f
i nclude h andles
d efinition .
( X-IX)
h owever,
r elated
f eatures
r eference
t echniques
Emborio
Macedonia
( Tsountas,
l ate
material
p lain a re v ery
p attern b urnished) and p ottery s hapes ( bowls);
h andles, 1 956:
t he E lmali
e astern A egean
f ramework t or
h orned),
p ainted, b ear
t he
s uch a s
t he material a vailable o utside S .W.
t he
t he
1 75).
u nstratified material o f t he c onstitute
d istrict
I n a ddition o ld explorations
r egions
c an o nly b e c onsidered c omparative t he
P amphylia
i s
f rom
i n
3 0)
and
mainland
A natolia.
s eem t he
I n
t he
t o
b e
s ame way b oth white p ainted d ecoration a nd c ommon
a ppearance
(Mellaart, s uch
a s
o f
1 971:
t he
f eatures
a ll
t he D ark
B urnished
1 37).
d ifferent
o ver
t he A egean wares
( Mellaart,
t hat
1 966:
H owever ,
l ate
o f
c arinated
t oo
c loser r elations
b owls
( incurved t hrough
i s
r im)
t hese
a nd
t he
s pecific
b etween r egions h ave b een s uggested
s ince many c haracteristics h ave a m ulti-directional e ast-
c losely
c loser
with
5 th m illennium
1 44).
T here i s e vidence h ad
t he
I t
west d istribution i t would b e wrong t o l ink t he c oast
i n
a ssociated
Minor s tylistic v ariations i nevitably exist f orms
b urnished d ecoration ( pattern b urnished) . p eculiarities
c arinated b owls
r egion
w ith c ultural t hat
c ontacts
t he
w ith
d evelopments
i slands a nd t he
o n
western
t he A natolian
p lateau .
s outhern i slands o f K alymnos, Kos a nd R hodes
s outh-western A natolia
t han t he n orthern o nes
( Sampson , 1 979) d espite t he l ack o f material f rom t he c oastal a reas o f C ilicia where no p rehistoric o ccupation h as b een d etected ( Mellaart, 1 954:
1 86) .
Moreover
i f
c halcolithic c ulture i s
a n orth-western A natolian o rigin t o b e a ccepted
f or
t he
noticeable d ifference i n t he p ottery f eatures o f t he p lateau; i ndications
h ave
b een g iven b y
t he e arly b urnished wares
w estern A natolia p roposed b y F rench I t
b ecomes
c lear
t hat
d uring
( 1967B, t he
a s
f ar
a s
b asic
p ottery
5 th
millennium
c haracteristics,
B urnished wares, a re c oncerned.
b e a s uch
o f n orth-
1 969).
c limate o f u niformity p revailing o ver b oth c oasts o f l east
l ate
t hen t here c ertainly s hould
t here
was
t he A egean
s uch
a s
t he
a a t
Dark
The d ecline o f t he p ainted p ottery,
more d ramatic i n A natolia , g ave way t o t he a ppearance o f t he b urnishing t echniques w ith a v ariety o f d ecoration ; d istribution o f s imilar wares e xtended
a s
h owever ,
r egrettable t hat a more c onclusive b asis
t ransition more
f ar f rom
evidence
e lements
which
a s
t he
e arly i s
s outhern t o
l ate
a vailable,
c ould
a ccount
B alkans
( Tringham,
c halcolithic
c annot
I t
i s,
f or u nderstanding
1 971:
t he
b e
i ncluding a k nowledge f or
a n e conomic
1 22
a nd
1 06) .
s uggested . o f
t he
U ntil
c ultural
t echnological
c hange
f rom t he p receding t radition i n A natolia,
o ur k nowledge o f t he l ate
c halcolithic p eriod m ust r emain u nsatisfactory. G enerally
s peaking,
t he
p attern
o f
i nterrelationships
b etween
t he
various s ites and g eographical r egions must b e t reated with r eserve u ntil m ore d ata i s
a vailable.
1 23
8 .
T HE A EGEAN N EOLITHIC D URING T HE L ATE 6 th a nd 5 th M ILLENNIA I n
t his
p revailing 6 th
a nd
chapter
5 th i n
d efinition
t o
t he
a rchipelago,
o f
and
t he
d evelopments, c ombined
o r
a ll
s ections,
r egion , a nd
b y
made
t he
i s
t here
a lso
e xamining
r econstruct d uring
t o
i ts
i n
f or
a n
l ate
p resented
a nd
a c ultural
p osition
w ithin
W as
p articular, i t
t he
t he
g ive
d evelopments .
S porades
e vidence
t o
i slands e vidence
a nd
A natolian
northern
b e
A egean
t he Greek mainland a nd d id
t he
t he
A egean
within
t he
s imply f ollow i ts
i ndependent
e volution
with
i nfluences f rom b oth G reece a nd A natolia?
B ut
f irst
o f
a ll
l et
t he n eolithic d eveloped t o t hat
t he
c ombining
G reek
s phere o f
will
a rea o f
p revious
t he A egean
f ramework
c ultural
a ttempt
t he
millennia,
d iscussed b road
t he
s ituation i n
u s
c onsider
t he
f undamental
q uestion
o f
h ow
i n G reece a s a whole a nd what a re i ts r elations
o f A natolia, a n a rea which p layed a l eading r ole
i n t he p rocess
o f n eolithic c hange . S ince t he i nvasionist a nd m igrationist models e xplaining c ultural c hange h ave b een a bandoned a s t oo s implistic, e stablishment
o f
t he f irst f arming c ommunities i n s outh-east E urope a nd
e specially i n Greece c annot E astern
s ettlers
b e s een any
m oving i nto
more
a s
t he
t he A egean ( Weinberg,
a n
A chilleion a nd
independent
i ntroductory
F rancthi
p rocess
s tages
o f
o f
the
c ave
d o
n ot
r esult
o f N ear
1 5).
H owever,
1 965:
t he e vidence f rom t he e arliest n eolithic s ettlements N ikomedeia,
f or t he
i n G reece
l ike N ea
u nequivocally
c ultural
c hange .
n eolithic
p eriod
A lthough i n Greece,
p oint
f rom
t o t he
t he P PN
o r
a ceramic p hase, t here i s evidence o f a well e stablished s ubsistence s trategy with a wide r ange o f d omesticated p lants, most
o f
1 973B:
t hem
i s
1 47).
a nd g oat ,
n ot n ative
T he
a nimal
i n
t he
a rea
h usbandry
which a lthough t hey were
t oo
t heir
1 968:
2 41),
have
not
wild s tate ( Payne,
which
marked
G reek
n eolithic
t he
s hown
t o
h igh
w ith
b een
1 968:
p oint i ts
But
1 975:
t he
E urope
s pecies
( Renfrew,
s uch
a s
s heep
1 20) a nd C rete ( Jarman and t o
b e
native
t o G reece
P ottery manufacture, p ainted
a chievements
wares
( Theochares,
h as,
i n
h owever, o f
h owever,
t he b een
1 967).
e ven i f i t i s a ccepted t hat t he Greek n eolithic e volved a nd
d eveloped
i ndependently
i nfluences,
i t
o f
B alkan ,
i s u nreasonable
A natolian ,
t o e xpect
a nd N ear E astern g enetic
t hat c ultural
b etween t hese a reas d id not t ake p lace a t a ll. o f c ultural change a nd t he p rocess, i n i ts b road s ense, 1 956). I f n otions a bandoned i t s eems P ottery
t he wild f orm o f
i n v ery e arly p rehistoric
t echnological
i mpressive
b e a l ocal d evelopment
i ncluded
p roved
3 68).
o f
s outh-east
i dentified
c ontexts i n mainland Greece ( Rayne, J arman,
o f
f orms,
s uch t hat
f igurine
d iffusionist model c annot b e d iscounted
a s a n e xplanatory a ltogether ( Childe,
a s ' higher c ulture' a nd ' invention ' a re d iffusion i s a valid c ultural f unction.
t ypes,
t ool
c ommunication a nd t rade w ithout a t
t he s ame t ime r epresenting I deas and t echniques c an
way
t oo
t he
i ndependent
without
t o
i nvolving
o ther
a reas
t he
c ontacts,
s ame
s pread
which c onstitute
c ultural d ependence and dominant r egions. t he
c an
a ll o f
a ssemblage
i n
a r egion
t ypes,
c ultural
t ravel
o f
i nteraction
D iffusion a s a f actor
massive
t hrough
movement
o f
p opulation. Thus i nevitably
e xclude
o f
t echniques .
c ertain
i ndirect What
n ature
o f
A natolian i t
s hows,
125
t he
Greek
i nfluences w ith
t he
n eolithic a nd h elp
t he o f
d oes
n ot
i ntroduction t he
a vailable
r adiocarbon
d ates
f undamentally s ettled
l ife,
( Mellaart,
d efine a nd
t he
1 975:
2 83),
n eolithic
f arming
may n ot
i s
t hat
p eriod
h ave
b een
b asic
s uch
p ractices
a s
which
domestication,
i ntroduced
t o G reece
f rom
Anatolia s ince t hey a ppeared a lmost s imultaneously i n b oth r egions. These p ractices were e xperimented u pon a nd e stablished g radually i n G reece
a nd
c onstituted
characteristics g eneral
u niformity
millennium c oncerned
t he
which i n
E urope
o f
a s
1 973:
s pecifically , o f
f ar
a s
3 3)
and
b io-social
p revalence
A natolia
c ultural
f rom
e conomic
a ssemblages
t he
o f
s ystems t o
a
s eventh a re
e merge
a nd
t ypes
c nd
t o d istinguish.
f rom
f rom
f igurine
t he G reek mainland b egin t o s how i ncreasing
r esemblances t o A natolian material 1 12,
a nd
The
f ramework p ottery c haracteristics,
a rchitectural f eatures 1 967:
t echnological
n eolithic.
p articularly
s imilarities
r egional d ifferentiations W ithin t his
t he
s outh-east
o nwards
a llowed
e conomic,
d efine
( Weinberg,
1 965:
t he e arly n eolithic
s imilarities
h ave
b een
s een
i n
5 88,
Theochares,
p eriod o nwards.
t he
t echnique
More
a nd
s hapes
t he F rühkeramikum p ottery f rom s ome T hessalian s ites s uch a s A rgissa
( simple
b owls)
( Milojel ,
1 962:
P late
2 1)
t o
t he
d ark
b urnished
o f 9 . atal Hüyük V III-II and e arly H acilar monochrome ware.
wares
T he n ext
p hase o f t he e arly n eolithic s hows e ven c loser r esemblances b etween t he two a reas ( ENII-Proto-Sesklo) with i ts c haracteristic b lack t opped ware a nd B untpolierte b een f ound H owever, w ell
Keramik.
P ottery employing t he s ame t echnique h as
i n Mersin XXV-XXVI ( Garstang,
t his c eramic f eature i s
( Tringham, The
1 971:
p henomenon
f ound
1 953:
3 5) a nd Hacilar V II.
i n t he s outhern B alkan r egion a s
7 8). o f
t he
a ppearance
A egean i s n ot u nconnected w ith s imilar
o f
p ainted d ecoration i n
d evelopments
i n Anatolia
The e arly r ed-on-white p ainted wares f rom P roto-Sesklo N ikomedeia a re c ontemporary with t he f irst p ainted p ottery o f I X-VI a nd
M ersin XXVI-XXV ( Mellaart,
o n-white
p ainted
n eolithic
p eriod
wares
a ll
c oincides
1 975:
2 60) .
o ver G reece
w ith
t he
i n
a nd N . H acilar
T he d ominance o f
t he
c ourse
f lourishing
o f
t he
o f
t he
t he t oo.
r ed-
middle
e xcellent
e arly
c halcolithic p ottery o f t he Anatolian p lateau ( see s ection 7 .4). The white-oh-red ware s eems t o h ave a widespread d istribution, a nd t his ware was b ased o n a s imilar p rinciple t o t hat o f
t he r ed-on-white ware,
namely t hat o f a chieving a l ight-dark c olour c ontrast.
I t o ccurs i n
Thessaly ( early S esklo), N . N ikomedeia, K aranovo I , Hacilar V I a nd I , and
i n
s outhern
a ppearance o f a nd
l ate
Anatolia
( Mellaart,
t he l ate c halcolithic
n eolithic
G reece
which
1 975:
d ark
u sed
2 61),
b urnished
t he
w hite
well wares
p aint
a s
b efore
t he
i n A natolia d ecoration a s
w ell. T he
a ppearance
o f
t he middle n eolithic i nfluence p aint
i s
glazed
( Perkins n ot
n ew
wares
o f
s ection 6 .2.1). p erhaps
s hows
e xistence o f
t he
p eriod
U rfirnis h as
- Weinberg, i n
t he
1 958 :
- p lain
2 25) .
Peloponnesos,
o r d ecorated - d uring
H owever,
where
i t
s trong A natolian t he
c an
b e
u se
o f
s een
g lossy i n
t he
t he e arly a nd middle n eolithic p eriod o f L erna ( see The varied e ffect
a s tage
t wo
ware
b een s een a s a s ign o f
o f
d ifferent
o f
t he g laze p aint
e xperimentation,
o n t he s urface
which t ogether w ith t he
c hronological s tages
o f d ecoration a t L erna ,
d oes n ot s upport t he i dea o f a d irect i ntroduction f rom a broad . I t i s n ow b elieved t hat t he U rfirnis ware was c reated a nd d eveloped s omewhere i n t he north-east P eloponnesos f rom where i t was d istributed t o t he
1 26
n orth
( Boeotia,
( French,
1 972:
A ttica,
E uboea,
S .
L ocris)
a t
a much
l ater
d ate
1 1).
Possible Anatolian i nfluence h as b een s een i n t he a ppearance o f t he b lack b urnished wares s econd
h alf o f
p ointed
o ut
o riginating o f
i n G reece a nd
t he 5 th millennium.
that f rom
i t
t he
i s
n ot
b lack
t he s outhern B alkans d uring
r easonable
b urnished
t o
s ee
p ottery
o f
t hat
( 1973:
9 0).
t his
was
part
I ndeed,
i t
a ppeared
i n Greece f or
( French,
1 972).
T hey
o f
i s
a g radual
h ave
b een
p hase" where t hey w ere f ound
A rchitectural T he
P lan V III), o f
t he
f eatures
u se
o f
megaron-type p eriod,
p lan
b lack
b e
i n Greece
b urnished
wares
a t
E latea
i n
t he
" Bothros
h ave
a t
two
a t
( burnished U rfirnis).
i nternal
a re
c an n ow
c hange
i n middle n eolithic d eposits
a ttested
a lso
b een a ssociated w ith A natolian
b uttresses
T sangli ( Wace - T hompson,
n eolithic
t hat
o f
d irectly
c halcolithic
t ogether w ith t he b lack-on-red p ottery,
C orinth ( grey ware) a nd F rancthi
i nfluences .
t ime
a s
l ate
b ecause i t
p rocess
s ignificant
t he f irst
t his
t he
western A natolia o r s imilar B alkan p henomena,
s hown
t he
H owever, Theochares h as r ightly
a t
O tzaki
( MilojCi ,
1 912) a nd L erna,
S esklo
a nd
O tzaki,
c haracteristic
a nd
t he
during
c ases.
t he
The
1 971,
p resence middle
f unction
o f
i nternal b uttresses i s d ifficult t o e stablish a nd t heir n umber v aries . H ouse R a t T sangli h as f ive b uttresses i nstead o f t he s ix which would h ave b een n ecessary i f r oof .
S ome
o ther
t heir r ole
i nteresting
was
p oints
t o
a re
s upport
t he
t he
walls
l ack o f e ntrances
and
t he
i n s ome
o f t he s tructures a nd t he e xistence o f r aised p latforms b etween t he b uttresses b uttresses
( Theochares, c annot
p eculiarities 1 963 : o f
2 9) .
t he
b e
may
T here
S inos
h ave
t hrown s ome more s tructure r oom . r esult
o f
t he
A natolia
f unction
t hese
( Can
S esklo
a nd
t o
2 B)
( French ,
( Schlette,
c overed
h ave
o f
b uilding c an
s pace. o n
1 979:
t hat
1 06) . a o ne
T he r oom
t he a lready e xisting f irst
t he megaron-type
more
which
t he
s udden a ppearance
l ater D imini
i n D imini was
c hamber was a dded
f or
o f
c onstructional
H asan
i n t he a lleged
b elieves t hat Anatolian i nfluences b ased u nfounded ( 1973: 3 21, n ote 6 5, 8 6). S imilarities
t he
t hat
o n t he p roblem ( Chourmouziades,
main
n eed
b e
r ecent i nvestigations i n Thessaly have
megaron b uilding
t he a ppearance o f t he
S ince
may
i n
i n O tzaki,
However,
l ight
the
a nd
S o,
i t
o riginated
p lan
1 968) .
c haracter o f
6 6).
i s a s imilar p roblem
megaron-type
1 958,
1 973:
e stablished ,
b e s een a s
Theochares
a rchitectural
b een s een i n t he f igurine
t oo
a
f irmly
f eatures
material
a re
o f
Greece and Anatolia a re b ased o n general d escriptions r ather t han on i ndividual d etails .
T he m odelling o f
i n T hessaly ( Chourmouziades, ( Mellaart, b odies, t his t he
4 86,
F ig .
i s v ery s imilar .
b road o rigin
1 951:
1 970:
5 5).
r esemblance o f
s pecific
1 973 :
2 10),
b etween
N evertheless,
F ig .
1 6 - t ype I II) a nd H acilar
e specially i n t he u pper p arts
T he a ttempt,
t ypes,
t he n aturalistic f emale f igurines
1 05,
G reek
h as
l ed
h owever, a nd t o
A natolian wrong
o f
t heir
t o d efine more c losely e xamples,
a ssumptions
t racing
( Weinberg,
t here i s n o d oubt t hat one s pecific t ype o f
f igurine f rom Thessaly s hows r emarkable s imilarities with e xamples f rom H acilar, a f act which c an o nly b e e xplained b y t he e xistence o f c lose c ontacts b etween t he two areas.
This i s t he way i n which t he l egs o f
t he
f igurines a re r epresented i n e xamples
s eated
n aturalistic
f emale
f rom S esklo and P rodromos H acilar
( Mellaart,
1 970:
( Chourmouziades,
2 16,
P late C LVIII).
127
1 973:
1 20,
F ig.
1 7)
a nd
The
wide
r anging
b ut
s ometimes
o bscure
s imilarities
c ultural a ssemblages o f A natolia a nd G reece d uring millennia ( Rodden,
1 965:
8 2) must
b e
s een a s
t he
t he
r esult
c ontacts t hrough t rade a nd c ommunication r ather t han a s d irect i nfluence o f o ne a rea o n a nother ( Fig. 8 3). O bsidian h as b een s een a s a n i ndicator o f Aegean
a lthough
i t
h as
n ecessarily t he p rime
r ightly
o bject
b een
i n
o f c ultural
t he r esult
t rade a nd c ontact
p ointed
o f t rade ( Renfrew,
o ut
t he
l ate 6 th a nd 5 th
t hat
D ixon ,
i t
C ann,
o f a
i n t he
was
n ot
1 966:
5 0) .
T he o bsidian f rom Melos e specially, ( Cann , R enfrew, 1 964: 1 11) with i ts widespread d istribution i n most o f t he e xcavated s ites i n T hessaly, Macedonia,
P eloponnesos
n etwork
c ommunication
p eriod
o f
( Renfrew ,
C ann ,
a nd
t he
o n
i slands,
l and
D ixon ,
a nd
1 965:
i ndicates
b y
s ea
2 38) .
f rom
a w ell t he
e stablished
e arly
E ven i n r egions
n eolithic
where s o f ar
o bsidian h as b een l acking s uch a s T hrace ( French, 1 961), r ecent s urface f inds f rom t he S ostis t oumba i n t he a rea o f Komotini show t hat what a ppears More
t o
b e
M elian
i mportant
c oncerned , western
i s
a s
o bsidian
f ar
t he
a s
t he
p resence
Anatolia
and
p robably
o f
most
r eached
e ast-west o bsidian o f
t he
A egean
c ontacts f rom
M elos
eastern
a nalyzed s amples a re e ither u nstratified
T hrace
a cross a nd
f rom
i slands.
( Morali
i n
a s
well .
t he A egean a re N isyros
A lthough
i n t he
western Anatolia
F ig. 8 0, N o.8) o r c ome f rom mixed d eposits ( Aspripetra c ave i n K os, T igani i n S amos), t o j udge f rom t he c eramic e vidence o f t he s ites t hey must
b e
l ate n eolithic i n d ate.
obsidian
f rom
Aegean
s ources
Whether o r n ot t he d istribution o f extended
f urther
i nland
i n
western
Anatolia i s n ot y et k nown . I t i s a f act, h owever, t hat t here i s n o s ource o f workable obsidian b etween t he A egean ( Melos, N isyros), a nd C appadocia 1 976:
( 9iftlik ,
1 37) .
g roup
2 b
a nd A gicöl,
g roup
l e-f)
( Renfrew,
D ixon ,
Obsidian o f Anatolian o rigin h as n ot b een f ound i n t he
Aegean a part f rom a s ingle p iece a t S itagroi i n Macedonia ( Shelford, H odson,
C osgrove,
I ndirect
W arren a nd
C olin R enfrew ,
e vidence f or c ontacts
a lready b een s uggested,
a re
1 981:
2 29
a nd
P late
1 5.6) .
b etween G reece a nd Anatolia,
p lentiful.
T here
a re
b road
a s
h as
s imilarities
b etween t he monochrome p ottery o f t he l ate n eolithic H acilar t ype which r eached t he Aegean c oast and t he i sland o f C hios ( Hood,
1 981) and t he
early n eolithic monochrome wares o f Thessaly a nd t he i slands o f t he c entral
A egean .
d istribution b etween t he n eolithic t he
gaps
I t
i s
p attern
o f
two c oasts
a nd i n
s imilarities
t he
t he
r egrettable t he
p ainted
t he
o f t he A egean d uring t he
Anatolian
e arly
d istribution
r eappear
t hat
i n
t he
i n
d ark
u sefulness
o f
t he
p ottery a s a p roof o f c ontacts e arly a nd
m iddle
G reek
chalcolithic i s l imited b ecause o f western
Anatolia .
b urnished
w ares
o f
Nevertheless,
w estern Anatolia ,
t he e astern i slands and mainland G reece i n t he c losing s tages o f t he 5 th m illennium. The
p osition
A natolia d uring not
only
the
o f
t he lack
t he
A egean
n eolithic of
i slands
p eriod
excavated
i s
i n
n ot
s ites
r elation
a dequately on
the
t o
i slands
r esponsible f or t he l imited a rchaeological d ata a vailable b ut were
a lso
t he
f act
o ccupied
f or
t hat t he
f undamental
q uestions
f irst
o r
s ustain a re s till u nanswered S ince
t ime
( Evans,
t he p alaeolithic f inds
what
1 973:
s uch a s k ind
5 17,
i n t he a rea o f
1 28
o f
1 977:
Greece
d efined .
and
I t
i s
which
i s
f rom
t he a rea
when
t he
l ife
t hey
i slands c ould
1 2).
t he A egean i slands a re
i ew
( Cherry,
d isputed
1 981:
( Honea,
P re-neolithic c onsidered . p rovided i tself
a nd
t he
2 77,
p resence
Cherry,
o f
mesolithic
1 979:
2 8),
t he
T he
i slands
o f
v aluable
n orthern
S porades,
i nformation
f inds o n Kyra P anagia
( Plan I II),
h owever ,
( Theochares,
and
o n
t he
h ave
1 970:
s ite
o f
a
o f
( see
r ecently
2 71).
A gios
i ndicate w ith c onsiderable c ertainty t hat
was o ccupied i n t he middle p alaeolithic p eriod I n a ddition ,
s ettlements
h ypothesis
o ccupation i n t he i slands h as not b een v ery s eriously
more
p alaeolithic
4 1)
1 975:
The
P etros
t he i sland
s ection 2 .2.1.).
t he s ite o f A gios P etros h as y ielded s ome more i nteresting
i ndirect e vidence which might s uggest a c ontinuous o ccupation f rom p alaeolithic t imes . T he p resence o f Mousterian t ools o n t he s urface a nd s ometimes i n t he mixed u pper l evels
o f
s ite
b etray
a lthough d ifficult
I ndeed
a s
t he
u nderwater
t o
e xplain may
g eomorphological
o bservations
i ndicate
t he n eolithic d eposit
s urvey i t
i s
s ome
o f
t he
p ossible
s ort b ay
t hat
only
a n
r easonable
u nderwater
t o
s uggest
excavation
t hat,
a s
t he
c ould
s ea
l evel
o f
t he
c ontinuity .
t ogether t he
were d etected 4 0 m deep into t he s ea, i n f ront o f s ettlement, were o ccupied f rom t he p alaeolithic t imes . a nd
o f
c aves,
with which
the n eolithic I f t his i s s o -
p rove
i t
b ecame
h igher,
- t hen
i t
i s
s ometimes
r apidly ( Appendix I II) , t he h abitation s ite was t ransferred t o h igher g rounds, t owards t he p resent s horeline . T hus we a re c onfronted w ith t he s ituation where more o r l ess t he s ame e nvironment s ustained b oth hunter-gatherer a nd f armer g roups ( Evans, 1 977: 1 4). O n s trictly e cological grounds i t i s d ifficult t o explain t he p reference o f palaeolithic man for e xamination , h owever, o f v egetation i ndicates
a nd
t he
t nat
a restricted i sland e nvironment. C loser t he a rea o f n orthern S porades with t heir r ich
p resence
p alaeolithic groups, which c rossing t he s hallow s ea l ane t herefore
o f
wild
b ecomes
a pparent
f actor
must
b e
( Halstead,
I f
i t
w ere
1 981:
h ave moved
s tarted
t hat
s implistic
t o
l ife.
( 1) t hat
s ome
I f
o f
t he
t hat
s ome
b ased
o f
e arly
i slands
a nd
( 2)
where
l evels o f F rancthi c ave,
e xplanations
o f
t he h istory
would
t hat
s mall
c onditions b een
have
two
important
f amiliarity w ith t he h unting
were
f ound
g roups
s uitable
i n
t o
t he u pper
s ea must
h ad
a lready
t heir
way o f
p alaeolithic
a s i t h as b een r eported ( Perles,
1 979),
b ecomes v ery t hen t he
s tages o f a daptation c annot b e s harply d istinguished ( Cherry,
1 981:
I n o ther words, i t i s difficult t o a ccept t hat p rehistoric man
s tarted
t o
" colonize"
t he
o ffshore
d uring t he n eolithic p eriod, h imself
t o
h ave b een e xplored p rocess
P ossibilities
o f f or
i slands
o f
t he s ame
t hat means o f
G reek
mainland
o nly
t ime.
s ustaining l ife
b efore a ny s ettlement
b ecoming
t he
e stablishing s ettlements a nd a dapting
t he n ew c onditions a t
There i s n o d oubt This
t he
A nd i t i s t rue t hat i f t he whole p rocess o f b ecoming
f amiliar with a n ew environment was a s low and a l ong o ne
m ust
o f I t
o n generalized e cological
p ossibility t hat p alaeolithic man was v isiting t he i slands
4 1).
f or
t he A egean i slands e xperienced a
this
p rehistoric man 's
Melian obsidian h as
s trong i ndeed.
i slands,
g round
s ince r egional v ariation i s a v ery i mportant
" colonization"
v ery
s ome
a hunting
1 94).
a ccepted
pre-neolithic i mplications:
a voided
o n
p rovided
were willing t o c ross, o r c apable b etween K yra P anagia a nd Halonnesos .
o f s ettlements i n t he A egean i slands a rguments
goats
t he r egion c ould h ave
f amiliar
s ubsistence
with
a n ew
o ptions a nd i ts
1 29
o n t he i slands
was a ctually e stablished . environment,
i ts
r equirements must h ave
p receded
a ny
d ifficult
t o i magine t hat c ertain
d ecision
t o
e stablish
p ermanent
t echnological
s ettlement. a dvances
I t
s uch a s
i s t he
c onstruction o f b oats; f ishing a nd n avigation d id not p ass t hrough a l ong p eriod o f experimentation . T here must have b een a p eriod when i nhabitants o f c oastal s ites were b ecoming i ncreasingly a ware o f t he p otentialities o f t he s ea a s a f ood r esource, r outes o f c ommunication and
f ields
o f
c ommercial
a ctivity.
T he
Melian
obsidian
i n
t he
n eolithic d eposits o f t he F rancthi c ave i ndicates t hat s ome s ort n avigation was p racticed i n t he A egean a t m illennium ( Aspinall, F eather a nd R enfrew, e arlier,
i f
P erles
r eport
i s
c orrect .
l east 1 972:
o f
a s f ar b ack a s t he 7 th 3 33) a nd p robably much
C oastal s ettlements,
h owever ,
o f
mesolithic o r e arly n eolithic d ate a re v ery r are . M oreover n one o f t he e xisting c oastal s ites h ave b een s ufficiently e xcavated t o p rovide e vidence f or a n e conomy a nd t echnology which were t ransformed g radually t o a ccommodate n ew p ractices a nd
t o a djust
t o n ew e xperiences.
The l ack o f c oastal s ettlements h as b een a scribed t o c hanges i n s ea
l evel
( Shackleton - V an A del,
c ertainly o f
r esponsible
c oastal
s ites
s imply
a ssumed .
i nformation R app,
a bout
1 977:
t he
s uch a s N .
i n A ttica ( Sampson, b e
f or
1 976:
3 57) .
a nd
H owever,
s tudies
p roblem
o n
o f
C hanges
i n s ea l evel a re
d isappearance
Makri ( Theochares,
1 70) .
R egional t he
1 980 :
e rosion
1 956:
o f
l arge
p arts
1 ) a nd A gia Marina
g eological f actors
s hould
n ot
e ustatic c hanges c an g ive s ome
a l ocal
s cale
( Kraft,
A schenbrenner,
9 41).
A geomorphological e xamination o f t he c oast o f T hessaly a nd northern Euboea i n r elation t o s ea l evel c hange i s p resented b elow. K raft 's
c urve
P eloponnesos c oastline n eolithic a rea
h ad
s howing ( 1977,
i n
t he
i t
r elative 1 3),
i s
Pagasaian
p eriod .
A ssuming
n o
i n 5 ,000
B .C .
b ecomes
P agasaian Gulf
i s
t oday .
c lear
would
l evel
t he
i n
t he
c alculate
t he
a nd
n orthern
E uboea
a ctivity
r elevant
o r
s ea
i s
unlikely
p resented
o f
s outhern
p osition
must
c urve
t hat
o f
t he
d uring
d eposition
l evel
w e a pply t he s ame
i t
a reas
t o
t ectonic
I f
t hat
have
s ea
u sed
Gulf
o ccurred,
1 7 m l ower t han i t d ata
t he
F ig .
t he
i n
h ave
t he b een
o n T hessalian
t he
c oast
a v ery d ifferent
o f
p icture
t he f rom
t oday . T he c onsiderable d epth o f t he s ea n ear t he c oast ( 40-60 m ), i f we do not t ake e arth movements i nto a ccount, i ndicates t hat c oastal p lains t han
s uch a s
t hey
a re
t hose i n t he V olos a nd A lmiros a rea w ere n ot much l arger t oday .
S o
t he
c hances
t hat
s ites
with
p rehistoric
o ccupation h ave b een l ost i n t he a rea b ecause o f a r ise i n s ea l evel, a re v ery small . T he s ame a ppears t o b e t he c ase a t t he e ntrance o f t he g ulf a nd Maliakos K olpos, a nd o n t he n orthern E uboean c oast, where t he existence o f s ubmerged c oastal s ettlements i s v ery unlikely . T he a pplication o f t he s ame r elative s ea l evel c hange i n t he a rea o f t he northern S porades ( Fig. c oastal
p laces
8 4) c an g ive a n i dea o f
which might
h ave
b een s uitable
o r m ight h ave b een u sed a s a rable l and
t he
a vailability
o f
f or n eolithic o ccupation ,
f or s ettlements
s ituated f urther
i nland. To c ome b ack t o t he q uestion o f t he " colonization" o f t he A egean i slands i t i s i nteresting t o n ote t he e arly n eolithic date o f a ll t he known t he
n eolithic
f act
t hat
c hronologically o ccupation
c oastal
t he
f irst
s ites
c ontemporary
l evels
o f
( Theochares,
i sland
S kyros
1 973).
s ettlements
with
a nd
b e
M ore i mportant i s e stablished
t he c oastal s ites .
Agios
1 30
t o
P etros
s hould
a re
B oth t he e arly b e
c onsidered
r oughly c ontemporary with t he f oundation o f N . m iddle o f t hat
i t
t he i s
s econd h alf o f
v ery
d itticult
c hronological g ap o r n ot i sland
s ites
I f o ver
i t
b e
b etween
i s u ntrue t hat
b e
t o
more
t he
I t
p recise
l ong
f oundation o f
t he A egean i slands were
p eriod
c onsidered
t hen
t he
c ultural
g enetically
a s
a n
i s
i n a round t he t rue,
whether t he
s ince w e a re d ealing w ith a p eriod o f
a v ery
c annot
Makri,
t he 6 th millennium .
h owever,
t here
c oastal
was
a nd
a
t he
s everal c enturies. -c olonized"
e volution o f
o ffshoot
o f
g radually
t he
t he
r egion
mainland
t radition , which b ecame d ifferentiated a s t ime went o n f rom t he r est o f t he Greek n eolithic. I f t his i s so, a p arallel development o f t he mainland a nd t he i slands must b e a ccepted . This will i nclude two r egions, which a lthough environmentally and e cologically d ifferent, s hare
and
t he s ame
b asic e conomic a nd t echnological c haracteristics.
I would l ike t o suggest t hat t here was i n t he a rea o f t he Aegean particularly i n n orthern S porades d uring t he l ate 6 th a nd 5 th
millennia a n e cological a nd cultural i sland c ultures
f lourished .
f ramework was n ot
f ramework
I t may well b e
within
t rue
which c ertain
t hat e cologically
s table o r u nchanged o ver s uch a l ong p eriod o f
t his
t ime.
I t i s c ertain t hat t he s ettlement p attern o f t he Aegean i slands during t he l ate 6 th and 5 th millennia was influenced b y a number o f f actors
s uch a s e nvironment,
T he g eographical
c haracter
s ubsistence a nd p roximity t o
o f
a lly d ifferent f rom t oday .
t he
i slands
was
p robably
t he mainland .
n ot
f undament-
A lthough t he s ea l evel was much l ower ( 5-10
m ), t he r atio o f i ts c hange c annot b e c onsidered t he s ame i n a ll p arts o f t he A egean ( Flemming, 1 973). The c ase o f A gios P etros h as s hown t hat
each a rea
must
b e
t reated
s eparately,
s ince
l ocal
g eological
f actors s uch a s e arthquakes may h ave d ramatically a ltered t he c hange i n s ea
l evel
t urn c an
( Appendix I ). i ncrease
T his
c an
r esult
i n l andscape
o r d ecrease s ubsistence
E nvironmentally , e ntity f rom mainland
c hanges
which
i n
p otentialities .
most o f t he A egean i slands c onstitute a s eparate G reece a nd western A natolia . H owever , t hey l ack
h omogeneity e ven among t hemselves .
A part f rom
t he
l arger
i slands
s uch
a s C rete which, a s might b e expected, o ffer an a rea s uitable f or t ree g rowth a nd
f ertile
d ifferences T he d ryness
l owlands
b etween t he a nd
s oil
( Bintliff,
1 977:
7 3),
t here
a re
n oticeable
i slands o f t he c entral and northern Aegean.
p overty o f
most
o f
t he
C yclades
a re
n ot
f eatures
which c haracterize t he S porades; t he l atter s hould r ather c onsidered e cologically a s a n e xtension o f t he T hessalian m ainland. There among
i s
t he
e vidence
i slands
t o
s uggest
( Halstead,
b e
t hat e cological d iversifications
1 981:
1 94)
a re
r eflected
b y
t heir
h abitation h istory ( Cherry, 1 981: 5 4, T able 1 ) . A lthough o ur k nowledge o f n eolithic s ites i n t he i slands i s f ar t oo l imited t o a llow g eneral c onclusions,
i t
i s
n ot
p erhaps
c oincidence
i n t he A egean c omes e ither f rom t he which a re n ot
t hat
t he
e arliest
b ig i sland o f C rete o r f rom
b arren a nd d ry s uch a s Kyra P anagia a nd S kyros .
material i slands H owever,
t o explain t he e stablishment o f n eolithic s ettlements i n t he Aegean i slands s hall
merely o n s ubsistence grounds
s eems
t o b e
i nadequate a s we
s ee f urther b elow . O ther
f actors,
s uch
a s
t he g eographic
1 31
p osition o f
t he
i slands
a nd
t neir p roximity t o t he Greek mainland, must a lso h ave s ignificantly i nfluenced d evelopment o f t he c ultural f ramework o f t he r egion . C atastrophes with environmental c auses s uch a s s ea l evel c hange a nd c rop
f ailure,
( Halstead
a nd
t he
l imited
a nd O 'Shea,
1 982 :
H owever,
t he
d ecisive
S porades
was
c oncerned,
n umber
9 2)
o f
m ight
i nfluence,
a lternative
a lso h ave a s
I b elieve,
f ar was
a s
a vailable
i mportant
t he
e xerted
s ituation i n t he wider r egion o f t he A egean,
o ptions
b een
a rea b y
o f
t he
f actors . n orthern
p revailing
a n a rea which i ncluded
b oth t he G reek a nd t he A natolian mainland . I f we a ccept t hat c ultural c ontacts existed b etween Greece and Anatolia - and t hese a re p roved f rom
t he
material
i slands.
r emains
R egional
- t hen
s urveys
e astern M acedonia ( Grammenos, f or t he u se o f a n o verland f rom b oth a reas 1 970:
t hey must
h ave
i n Aegean T hrace 1 975 :
1 94)
r oute ;
a nd l ater f inds
b een made
h ave n ot
1 979)
a nd
p roduced a ny e vidence
e arly n eolithic
s how
t hrough t he
( Efstratiou, material
i s
l acking
s trong B alkan c onnection ( Renfrew,
2 95). B ut e ven i f t he s ea i s a ccepted a s t he o nly r oute o f c ontact, c an
i t
be
suggested
facilitating
that
the
i slands
navigation
s ignificance? c haracteristic
and
were
t rade
only
but
s tepping
without
s tones,
any
cultural
The material remains o f Agios Petros f igurine t ypes and p ainted wares c an
with the h ardly b e
c onsidered a s p roduct o f a n o rdinary t rading o r n avigation p ost .
S ince
a ll t he o bjects a re l ocally made a nd n ot imported i t i s d ifficult t o b elieve t hat t he s ettlement was l acking o f a d istinctive c ultural i dentity . E ven i f Agios P etros was n ot i tself t he main s ite o f t he c ulture t here i s a s trong p robability t hat t he c entre o f t his i sland c ulture w as s ituated i n o ne o f The e nriched
evidence b y
t he
a vailable
f inds
f rom
f rom S kyros i ndicated t hat o f
t he A egean
i n
t he
f or
t hat
t he o ther h and,
f rom
A gios t he
t he
A egean
P etros .
i slands
While
s imilarities
t he
was
greatly
l imited
material
e stablished
o n b oth
e arly monochrome p ottery a re f ound i n t he
o f c entral A egean a s well, s equence
t he n earby i slands.
e arly
i t f ailed
p eriod .
T he
c oasts i slands
t o p roduce a d efinite c ultural
s tudy
o f
t he
S aliagos
r eestablished t he c eramic p arallelism
c ulture,
b etween
e ast
o n a nd
west i n t he l ate n eolithic p eriod with i ts dark-faced wares ( Evans R enfrew,
1 968:
8 9).
The Agios P etros c ulture, h owever, p rovided a r eliable c ultural s equence f or t he whole n eolithic p eriod a nd , most i mportant, i t s howed a l ink w ith A natolia . I t e xtended o ur k nowledge o f t he d istribution o f t he p ainted wares o f t he G reek mainland t o t he e ast c onsiderably , a nd i ndicated t hat a c eramic l ink b etween t he Anatolian p lateau a nd t he e astern i slands f eatures
s how
i s
p ossible .
r elations
s outhern Anatolia a nd
with
S pecific p ottery t he
e arly
s hapes
a nd
c halcolithic
t he s ite o f Ag. G ala in C hios.
f igurine
c ultures
Moreover,
o f t he
p ermanent nature o f t he s ite and o f i ts e xternal r elations g ive s ome i dea o f t he activities o f an i sland c ulture during t he f irst half o f t he 5 th millennium. t hat
t he
c ontacts
i slands o r
I t i s s hown t hat t here i s a s trong p ossibility
were
s erving
n ot
t rade
s imply
s tepping
movements
s tones,
i n t he A egean ,
f acilitating
c ross
i nhabited b y p eople
w ithout t heir own c ultural i dentity . O n t he c ontrary , t here i s s trong e vidence t hat t he A egean i slands w ere a c ulturally a ctive a rea i n t heir own
r ight
which
h ad
t he
capacity
1 32
t hrough
p ermanent
o ccupation
t o
c ombine a nd
i ncorporate e lements
f rom G reece a nd A natolia.
1 33
9 .
C ONCLUSIONS: T he
c ontribution o f
t he
A gios
P etros
material
t o o ur k nowledge
o f
t he Greek n eolithic p ' eriod i s s ignificant and t he d iscussion o f t he a rchaeological r emains o f t he s ite w ithin t he w ider G reek a nd A natolian c ontext h ere
r aises
p resent A .
i mportant
t he main p oints
i ssues .
I w ill
t ry ,
t herefore,
t o
s ummarize
which i n o ne w ay o r a nother h ave c ome o ut f rom t he
s tudy.
T he p resence o f p alaeolithic
d evelopment
i n t he
t he A egean i slands. i sland
S ince
environment
r easonable
t o
f inds
s earch f or t he e ven
a ssume
a nd
motives
o f
t he eustatic e vidence i s
i n
t hat
o n Kyra P anagia i s
p attern
t he
middle
h uman g roups
o f
i n f avour o f a n
palaeolithic
b ecame
a n i mportant h abitation p eriod
f amiliar
w ith
a ssociated w ith t he s ea s uch a s n avigation a nd f ishing,
l ong
i t
i s
p ractices b efore
t he
n eolithic p eriod. B .
A gios P etros i s
which
was
e xcavated
t he e arliest n eolithic s ite o n a n Aegean i sland a nd
s tudied
t horoughly .
t hat i t was o ccupied a ll t he y ear r ound. t he
s ettlement
f or
t he
p otentialities
a nd
t heir
c ontacts
b ut
c ultural
a lso
w ith
a ll i ndicate
t he
t he
n ot
i n t he
o f
with
B alkans
i sland
o f
t he
a nd
middle o f
t he
navigation ,
r ichness
o nly
s outhern
t hat,
w as n ot a n i solated C .
p urposes
e conomy,
A ll
i ndications
t he
n earby
m ore
i ts
s ubsistence
material
r emains
T hessalian
i mportant
w ith
mainland
with A natolia ,
t he f ifth m illennium,
A gios
b ut a c entre w ith i ts o wn c ultural
T he d istinctive p ainted
a re
T he f avourable l ocation o f
p ottery o f A gios P etros e nriches
P etros
i dentity. t he k nown
r epertoire o f s hape a nd d ecoration i n mainland Greece i n t he middle n eolithic p eriod. D .
T he
f igurine
material
g eographical a reas a s E .
T his
i s
t he
s hows
f ar a part a s
f irst
t ime
t hat
s tylistic i nfluences f rom d ifferent t he
s outhern B alkans a nd A natolia.
G reek n eolithic
f inds
c an b e d irectly
a ssociated with material f rom t he c ultural c entres o f t he Anatolian p lateau,
g iven t he
A natolia a nd F .
l imited e vidence s o f ar a vailable f rom n orth-western
t he e astern A egean i slands.
I t i s d ifficult t o
a void t he implications o f t he existence o f an
i sland s ettlement with a d istinctive c ultural c haracter d espite t he l ack o f s imilar e vidence f rom o ther A egean i slands. Whether A gios P etros i s t radition
t he only which h as
d ifficult
t o say .
s ocial
c onditions
were n ot G . t he
T he
l imited
s urviving b een l ost I t
i s
p ossible,
which c reated t o t he a rea o f
p icture o f
t he
f ifth m illennium
s ite o f a n A egean i sland c ultural b ecause o f e nvironmental c hanges i s a nd
h owever, s ustained
t he S porades
t hat t he
t he
A gios
e conomic P etros
and
c ulture
i slands .
r elationship b etween G reece a nd Anatolia d uring
r emains o bscure .
T he material
f rom A gios
P etros,
h owever, h as i ndicated t he g eographical a rea a nd t he nature o f t he e vidence f rom which v aluable a rchaeological i nformation c an b e o btained a nd t entative h ypotheses
f ormulated f or
p revailing c ultural r elations
t he b etter u nderstanding o f t he
b etween t he
1 35
t wo a reas.
I n s ites,
c onclusion , a chieved
e nvironmental
b y a nd
i t
must
b e
s ystematic
s aid
t hat
s urveys
g eological
f uture
a nd
d iscoveries
b etter
t ransformations
o f
u nderstanding i nvolved,
i sland o f
a nd
t horough e xcavations o f a lready k nown s ites,
will c ertainly r eveal
e vidence
t he
o f
a bout
t he
c haracter
a nd
e xtent
t he A egean i slands.
1 36
o f
p rehistoric
t he a lso more
o ccupation
A PPENDIX I P RELIMINARY G EOMORPHOLOGICAL S URVEY O F T HE N EOLITHIC S ITE O F A GIOS P ETROS b y D r N ick F lemming The n orthern S porades a re a c hain o f s ix i slands
extending
e astwards
i nto
t he
north
p rincipal mountainous Aegean,
( Fig.
1 ).
The
P rincipal i slands c onsist o f C retaceous a nd J urassic l imestones w ith s ome metamorphism, and z ones o f s chist and marble. T here i s c loses paced-faulting , e ruptive d uring
a nd b eds o f b oulders a nd B reccia .
g reen-stones
t he p resent
P anagia.
( Philippson
1 901:
1 39)
T here a re s cattered
which
w ere
a lso
s tudy i n t he r avines o n t he s outh-east
P sathura i s b asaltic, ( Philippson 1 901:
i slands
b order t o
t owards
t he D ardanelles,
o bserved
c oast o f Kyra
1 69).
The c hain o f
t he n orth a d eep t rough which e xtends n orth-eastwards a nd
i s
k nown a s
t he
A natolian
T rough .
I t
i s
an a ctive graben ( McKenzie, 1 978) with a c entral d epth o f o ver 1 000 m within
3 0
km
o f
d epression
o f
Halonnesos
only
P anagia .
m e xtends
7 km
i nstrumentally S porades,
Kyra
1 800
A n
o ffshore.
measured
e xceptionally
p arallel
t o
McKenzie
e picentres
Major r ecent e arthquakes
d eep
e longated
n orth-west
( 1978,
s hallower
w ith a c oncentration o n H alonnesos,
K yra P anagia .
t he
F ig. t han
s hore
1 1) 5 0
s hows km
i n
o f 1 5 t he
a nd o ne e picentre b eneath
i n t he n orth A egean ( Magnitudes
M = 7 .1, F eb 1 9, 1 968; M = 5 .5, May 2 4, 1 978; M = 6 .5, June 2 0, 1 978) are d escribed b y D rakopoulos a nd Ekonomides ( 1972) and Mercier e t a l ( 1979): The i slands a re t hus l ocated i n a v ertically unstable a rea, a nd a re s ubject t he
walls
t o t he
o f
s eismic a ctivity a ssociated
t he g raben o f
t he main i slands
with n ormal
t he A natolian T rough .
r ange i n d epth f rom
f aulting
i n
T he c hannels b etween
1 00 m t o 1 48 m s o t hat
t he
d eeper
channels a re n ot l ikely t o h ave d ried o ut during t he l ate Quaternary unless c onsiderable e arth movements have i ncreased t he d epth o f t he c hannels t he
s ubsequently .
b ay o n t he T he
r eport
T he
s mall
i slet
o f
A gios
P etros
i s
s ituated
i n
a n
u npublished
s outh w est s ide o f Kyra P anagia.
s ubmarine
t opography,
b ased
o n
b y T heochares a nd s oundings made
s oundings d uring
f rom
1 981,
i ndicate
t he
f orm
o f shoreline which would h ave existed a t d ifferent l ower s ea l evels ( Fig . t he
2 ) .
A t - 5 0 m t he g ap b etween P elerissa a nd t he n orthern
b ay would b e c losed,
a nd
P elerissa and the s outhern s ide, c entre
o f
t he
p resent
s ide
o f
t here w ould o nly b e a s mall i nlet b etween
b ay.
o pening i nto a small l agoon i n t he
D uring
s treams would h ave c rossed t he
a p luvial
p eriod
s everal
small
f loor o f t he b ay t o f low i nto t he i nlet.
A t a d epth o f - 2 0 m t he c ontour p asses t o t he SW o f A gios P etros, s o t hat t he i slet would t hen have b een s imply a s pur o f h igh g round p rojecting
t owards
t he
s ea ,
w ith a v alley t o
t he n orth o f
i t .
A t - 1 0
m t he s ea invades t he valley t o t he north o f Agios P etros a nd f orms a l ong
n arrow
e xtended
i nlet,
r idge
o f
p rotected
t he
i slet
f rom
which
t he
i s n ow
s outh a nd
s outh-west
s ubmerged .
T his
l ong
b y
t he
n arrow
i nlet would h ave h ad t wo s mall s treams d raining i nto i t, a nd would h ave made a p erfect n atural harbour about 1 . 0 m d eep. F ig. 3 s hows t he s traight o pen
s ea
l ine
f etch
f etch
i s
f rom
A gios
b locked,
h eadlands enclosing t he
b ay,
P etros a s
i tself.
v iewed
f rom
I n
e very
Agios
d irection
P etros,
b y t he i sland o f P elerissa,
1 37
b y
t he t he
a nd b eyond
t hat, b y Halonnesos.
T hus Agios P etros i tself i s v ery s heltered, a nd
t he l ee o f t he i slet s tarted might
i t
s eemed
i s even more s heltered.
p ossible
t hat
t he
B efore
s ubmerged
a rea
t he s urvey was
o f
t he
s ettlement
b e e ither o n t he s ubmerged i sthmus b etween A gios P etros
P anagia,
o r
i n
t he
s helter
pure sand and exposed
o f
A gios P etros
t o
t he n orth .
r ock were e liminated,
e xclude t he p ossibility t hat
r emains m ight
a nd K yra
A ll
a reas
o f
a lthough o ne c ould
not
b e c oncealed u nder s and .
S o
i t was a greed t hat s everal 1 . 0 m s quare q uadrats c ould b e p laced on t he
b ottom,
a nd
t he
c ontents
existence o f a rtifacts.
o f
t he
q uadrats e xcavated
t o t est f or t he
The f irst quadrat, d esignated A .01 ( see F ig.
4 ) was l aid i n 3 .8 m o f water,
a nd e xcavated.
i nspection a fter washing a nd s ieving,
p roved
The f irst
s ample,
o n
t o c ontain s everal h undred
s herds o f b ronze a ge a nd n eolithic a ge, a s w ell a s many t ens o f b ones, s hells, and a f ew f ragments o f obsidian, f lint and quartz. T he b ones were
mostly o f
s heep and goats
s ample f rom A .01
s ediment l ayer t o b edrock was ( Fig.
4 )
p roduced
materials s tones,
were w ere
l ess
t han
Part
1 0 cm .
h igh c oncentrations
checked
a rtifacts,
s ediments
( Appendix I I,
c ontained a s imilar a ssemblage .
a nd
shells
s tored
o f
b ones
T he
s econd
t hickness
o f
t he
A ll s ubsequent q uadrats
a rtifacts
p hotographed, and
I I).
T he
and
i ncluding
( Appendix
f or g rain s ize a nalysis
I I,
b ones.
s and, P art
A ll
g ravel,
I I).
The
( Appendix I II) .
D iscussion; The questions which h ave t o b e a ddressed a re: does t he e vidence suggest t hat t he a rchaeological materials a re i n s itu, b een
t ransported
o r
s cattered
a t t he t ime o f o ccupation , there
b y wave
b y
t he
What
o r have
was
t he
s ea
what was t he t opography o f t he s ite ,
a s pecific h arbour a rea?
i nfluenced
a ction?
c ontinuously
H ow was
c hanging
t he o ccupation o f
s ea
l evel
d uring
t hey l evel
a nd was t he s ite
t he
p eriod
o f
o ccupation? T ypical e t a l,
1 976 ;
e ustatic
s ea
K raft e t a l,
- 1 5 m a t 6-7000 B P,
l evel
c urves
f or
t he
M editerranean
( Labeyrie
1 977) p redict s ea l evel o f - 2 0 m a t
and - 1 0 m a t 5 -6000 B P.
8 000
B P,
These f igures a re a ll
c onsistent with t he o ccupation o f t he s ite t o a d epth o f 1 0 m a t 7 000 B P. T hus, a part f rom i ndicating t hat t he s ea l evel must h ave b een l ower t han 1 0 m a t 7 000 B P, t he evidence obtained s o f ar f rom Agios P etros d oes n ot
p rovide a ccurate d ata o n s ea l evels.
A ssuming maximum d isturbance o f t he o bject c ould h ave l and,
a nd
moved
t ransported
r andomly
d isturbance, p resent wide
b een r emoved f rom i ts
s ea
z one,
t he l evel,
s ea
m d ownslope
metres l evel
washed
r eached
t he
b rought
b y
t o
S till
within
a rchaeological e roded
o ut
A model smaller
r ock
t he wave a ction
t ransgression ,
a nd
a ction ,
one
o r
two
w orst
a nd c ase
metres
o ff
c liff-terrace
o f
a 1 0-15
m
f eature.
i nto c ontact with more
and
t he l atter were
t hen
t errace.
a ssuming l ess d isturbance would
f ragments
wave
a ssuming
materials
t he
r ossa and a rchaeological f ragments,
d eposited o n t he
every a rchaelogical
swash a nd
a longshore .
and d issolved a nd
T ectonic s ubsidence t erra
1 0-15
s everal
s ite,
o riginal p oint o f d eposition o n
were
moved
t hat many o f
a s
much
as
s uggest 1 0-15
t hat m
o nly t he
during
the
t he l arger o nes were o nly m oved 5 -10 m ,
1 38
o r
l ess,
t he
b efore
e ustatic
t he
b ecoming
s tillstand
l imestone,
A rtifacts
a nd
w ithin
r elatively
e mbedded o ccurred
mechanical
t he
i n
s table
t he
e rosion
s olution/erosion
u nabraded,
whilst
f ine-grained
d ominant
e ffect
a nd
z one
o bjects
a brasion
w ere
s ands .
was
was
o ff
t he
o f
minimal.
t ransported
washed
When
s olution
d ownslope l and
were
t ransported t hrough t he z one. A fter t he f inal t ectonic s ubsidence materials were washed o ft t he l and a nd r edeposited o n t he s hallowel e dge o f
t he
t errace.
I t i s impossible t o d istinguish b etween t hese two models o n t he p resent e vidence. b een d estroyed,
I n b oth c ases s tratigraphic v ertical c ontext h as
t hough i n t he s econd model a ssemblages might s till
p reserve c onsiderable r elational c ontext. with
t he
a ssemblages
e xcavations c urrents. e xist
o f
h ave
which
b een have
There i s a c lose analogy
a nalysed b een
i n
a rchaeological
d isturbed
b y
One very important p oint must b e s tressed. a n
t otal
a s
a n
a rea
s ettlements . the
s hipwrecks
u nderwater
c overing
which
E ven
a ssemblage t o
i f
o bject
e very
assemblage
a rchaeologically
o f
s imilar
t hat
does
s ignificant
n eolithic
a nd
which
c ommon
h as
s till
i s
b een
materials .
I f
b ronze
d isplaced
exist
a s t he
waves
a nd
The s ite d oes a ge
f or 1 0
o bjects
n eolithic
m d ownslope,
a c oncentration s ea
l evel
were
t o
of
r ise
a f urther 5 0 m t he p resent s ubmarine s ite would b e e nriched b y s ome more a rtifacts a nd b ones b e
t otally
p rotected
f rom
f rom
t he p resent l and a rea ,
any
f urther
wave
o r
a nd
i t
c urrent
would
t hen
a ction .
I f
d ivers were t o f ind such a s ite u nder 5 5-60 m o f water t hey would b e r ewarded b y d iscovering a v ery s ubstantial a nd c omplex s ite, a lbeit s lightly d isplaced f rom The A gios
i ts
P etros
o riginal
submarine
l ocation .
s ite h as a lready s urvived
e xtreme l evels o f marine a ttack which i t i t
i s
s till
r ecognizable.
s tillstand a nd c ontinuous t he s ite a rea . 1 /20 .
B ecause o f
f ormed,
e ven
s urvived
a 3 000-5000
a nd y ear
wave a ttack a nd r ock s olution c utting t hrough
t he g radient
t he
f or s table b each s ands had
h as
t he most
l ikely t o u ndergo,
F rom t he p oint o f v iew o f m aximum s urvival p otential i t
i s a d isadvantage t hat t o
I t
i s e ver
i t
o f
t he s ite i s
r elatively s teep g radient
1 /4
r ather t han
i t
was n ot p ossible
t o a ccumulate i n t he wave z one .
1 /10
I f s uch b eaches
i s p ossible t hat a rtifacts and b ones might h ave b een
moved l ess t han a metre, o r e ven p reserved i n s itu ( see, f or example, Wreschner, h ouses,
1 977).
The b ehaviour i n t his r espect d epends o n whether
o r o ther waterside s tructures,
a f ew d ecades, Whether
w ere b uilt
t he
i nhabitants
t ried
t o a nticipate
whether t hey b uilt h ouses which s oon h ad t hat
t hey a ll
h ad
t o
b e a bandoned
p ossible t hat t he l ower p art t he
u pper
t he
s ea
p art,
o ver
a verage,
a nd
o f
t he
a f ew
y ears,
t he s ettlement
w as
o lder a rtifacts w ere
f ound
i n t he
o r
b uildings
f ound
o n
c ommunication), were
f ound
b oat-building,
t he a nd
o ther l and
s o
i t
underwater q uays,
i t
r ise,
i s
e tc .
1 39
c ould
i s
I t i s
t he
most
T heochares
n ot
r elated
o f
E vidence
r udimentary
b y o n
b ronze
h ouse
E tstratiou
t hat
maritime
f rom
i f,
t he s ite.
( 1970),
s urprising t o
t han
f orced u phill
b e d emonstrated
l ower p art
t han
s ite
i n e ffect
o r
c ertain
may b e c onsiderably o lder
T his
were
t he s ea l evel
t o t he s ea s ooner o r l ater. s ite
more .
s tructures f ishing,
t hat
a m illennium
N o s tructures ( personal
l ast
t o b e a bandoned,
o r
f oundations
t o
o r g enerations.
n o
s pecial
a ctivities, a ge
c oastal
s ites o f
( Harding
advanced
e t
a l,
1 969;
shipping,
b reakwaters
and
F lemming e t a l,
s ea
l anding
t rade,
p laces
h arbour i s u nlikely t o h ave h ad o ther
t han
l evel
t here
f ree
o f
t he
s implest
were
t o
were
any
d eep
b arriers,
n ot
b uilt.
b ays,
t heretore
t hat
warfare, Thus
a n eolithic s tructures
a p eriod o f
a nd
r ising s ea
e stuaries
t here
i n s pite
artificial
waterside
D uring
i nlets,
a nd
1 978) s hows
sea
s pecialised
w ooden j etties .
n umerous
a lluvial
i ncentive
and
would
c ompletely
have
b een n o
b uild a rtificial h arbours.
C onclusions: The A gios P etros s ite i llustrates t hat, i n a sheltered c eramics, b ut
a re
l ocation,
b ones,
a nd
s cattered
d estroyed
s everal
metres
d ownslope .
t he
h ave
o ccurred
l evel
r ose
f urther
t rial s ampling neolithic
and
a t rue
s everal
s hows t hat
i t
The
a rtifacts,
t ransgression ,
s low
s ubsidence
was
o f
s tillstand.
metres
c onfiguration .
e vidence t hat
a ction over a wider z one
r elative
t ens
i n a d isturbed
p rovides
s ite,
a ctivities,
d uring b y
b y marine
p resent h as exposed t he s hallow h alf o f t he
t o e xceptionally p rolonged wave
a lbeit
materials,
a re n ot
would
p reserved
o n a g radient o f 1i n 4 ,
archaeological
t ools,
b etween 5 000 B P and s ite
t he
c oncerning
i t
was
t he
s ite
P reliminary
t he
o riginal
p robably
t han
t he s ea
would
b e
s urvey a nd
e xtent
a c entre
s ituated on a p erfect
I f
f or
natural
o f
t he
marine
h arbour.
B oats were p robably b uilt o n t he b each, a nd l aunched o r p ulled o ut o f t he
water
a s
r equired.
Although
t he
p resent
c oast
i s
d evoid
o f
f reshwater s upply, t here a re two s ubmarine s prings which would h ave s upported t he c ommunity a t A gios P etros. F urther s olve
t he
s urvey
a nd
many q uestions
t horough
u nderwater
r aised :
D ate
o f
e xcavation
f irst
i s
r equired
o ccupation?
t o
E xistence
o f t ools r elated t o marine skills and a ctivities? Archaeological materials i n s tratigraphic c ontext u nder t he s and i n t he d eeper p art o f t he
s ite?
T he
d istribution
o f
a rtifacts
t o t ry and e stablish a p attern o f a rea , o f
a nd
marine
d isturbed
t o
u nravel
t he
A gios
P etros
A n
which h as
u nderstanding
s ite
b ones
s hould
b e
a nalysed
c ultural a ctivity within t he s ite
r edistribution
t ransgression . t he
a nd
would
b e
o f
o f
p rocesses
a r esult
which h ave
g reat v alue i n d iscovering
a nd u nderstanding o lder s ites i n d eeper w ater.
1 40
t he
o ccurred a s
R eferences:
D rakopoulos
J .C .
a nd
1 968,
E konomides
A .C .,
1 972
P ure a nd A pplied G eophysics, F lemming N .C .,
1 978
t he
A ftershocks
e arthquake i n n orthern A egean S ea a nd
H olocene
n orth-east
e ustatic
L ondon,
A ge
v .289,
A schenbrenner
S .E.
r econstructions S cience, L abeyrie J .,
L alou
v .195, C"
v .64, and
o f
P aris, M cKenzie D"
R app
t he R .
B P
A ctive S ea
i n o f
o f
t he
B ritish S chool
o f
G .,
1 977
Aegean
P alaeogeographic
a rchaeological
s ites.
p .941-947. a nd
T hommeret
a n os
j ours.
C omptes R endus, v .282,
1 978
A egean
models
p .113-142.
c oastal
Monaco A .
ans
t ectonics
f or
P avlo P etri, a n underwater
A nnual
C hronologie d es n iveaux e ustatiques d e-33,000
c oastal
p .405-458.
i n L aconia .
A rchaeology a t A thens, K raft J .C.,
1 9,
p roblems .
P hilosophical T ransactions o f t he R oyal
A .,
t own
a nd
implications
H arding A ., C adogan G . a nd Howell R ., 1 969 B ronze
F ebruary
p .100-115.
c hanges
Mediterranean:
c rustal c onsumption . S ociety,
v .95,
o f
r elated
a nd
t ectonics
o f
s urrounding
J ., s ur
O ceanographie:
l a c ote d u R oussillon
A cademie
S cientifique
d e
p .349-352. t he
A lpine-Himalayan
r egions .
A stronomical S ociety,
1 9/6
v .55,
G eophysical
b elt: J ournal
t he o f
2 17-254.
M ercier J .L., Mouyaris N ., S imeakis C ., Roundoyannis T . a nd Angelidhis C .,
1 979
I ntra-plate d eformation:
t he f aults a ctivated v .278, P hilippson A"
p .45-4
1 901
b y t he
a q uantitative s tudy o f
T hessaloniki
e arthquake .
N ature,
.
B eiträge
z ur
K enntnis
d er
P etermans G eographische Mitteilungen,
g riechischen
I nselwelt.
E rgänzungsband
XXIX,
H eft 1 32-137, N r.134, 1 72 pp . T heochares D .R .,
1 970
P anagia). W reschner E .,
1 977
Excavation o f
t he
i slet
A rchaiologikon D eltion:
o f Agios
C hronica,
N ewe Yam, a s ubmerged N eolithic
Mount C armel . E retz M emorial v olume.
I srael,
141
v .13,
P etros
v .25,
( Kyra
p .271-279.
s ettlement n ear
p .2h0-271,
M oshe
S tekelis
1 .
A .
N orth a nd s ites,
c entral
and
A egean
those
i n
s howing the
l ocations
region
o f
T heochares. B .
K yra P anagia a nd
n eighbouring
i slands.
o f
the
c oastal
n eolithic
Sporades,
after
c i n
2 .
A gios P etros a nd t he a djacent c oast. P oints marked w ith l etters A Q a nd Z a re s urvey p oints f ixed w ith t heodolite. S a nd S ' a re s ubmarine s prings. T marks t he l ocation o f t he t ide s taff . A .01 a nd A .02 a re t he t wo q uadrats w ithin t he grid which w ere most c ompletely e xcavated. C ontours o f d epth a re b ased o n s oundings m easured b y l ocations.
w eighted
t ape .
T he
u nmarked
p oints
i ndicate
s ounding
F i g . 2
3 .
A .
D irections o f maximum f etch a s m easured f rom A gios P etros . T he c ircumferential a rcs l abel t he d istinct a rcs w ithin which d ifferent f etches a pply.
B .
L arge s cale p lot o f t he f etch c entred A gios P etros. w ave a ction i s o nly s ignificant f rom t he s outh w est.
N ote t hat
u n LL
4 .
T he a rchaeological s urvey g rid, w ith t he s horeline a t t he t op . T he c ontours w ere o btained f rom p lots o f s oundings a t a ll g rid i nters ections, a nd a t 5 m m id-points . E xcavated q uadrats a re s hown A .01 t o A .06 . F or r eference p urposes a nd p hotographic i dentification t he 1 0 m x 1 0 m s quares were n umbered I -XV; t hat i s I -V i n t he s hallowest r ow; V I-X i n t he m iddle r ow; a nd X I-XV i n t he d eepest r ow.
0 ' )
i ) C D7
c -1
1 ,
C l )
L .
r-
01
c e i
••
0
4 • O
M t
a ) U
c l . )
i og 0
N I
a m
4 . . I
c a 4
a )
• 0 , 0
• C . )
•
•
( 1 . O
. H
-0
• c p . 2 1
-4c o I , I
3 c g 1 1 9- 1
C D C O r q + I C D C ) , 4 u l
C ) C h r q + 4 C D N J C Z I n
C D M. + 1 C D . f u l
8 5
c o n t d
R a d i o c a r b o n
c u
. 1 . J W C D
r . r q t D O r n , C D C V N . t r l , J D 1 c ' q 11 I I Z Z
r . 0 1 C s,' C • 1 , . 0 0 C . J C . 3 1 1 44 11 ' . 4 , 1
S t r a t u m V .
0 ( I ) ( Y ) 0 > 4
NJ r l 7 u l r u l L n L n L n u l L n
T i
a . a .
C L 4
0 > 0
0 > 0
0 Z > Z 0 7 : 1 • r I 1 1 0
C U ( 1 ) C I ) V ) V ) V ) ( l ) ( S ) G . ) C O C V > > >
C O ( T i 1 1 1 1
( T i
_ o , o
1 4 I 1
. 0 4 3
H
4 1
1 . 1 1 4
V . )
0 1 4 t 2 1 )
C r )
D i k l i T a s
F r a n c t h i C a v e
S t r a t u m I X . E N
[ 4
c o u ) ( T i c t i
D O 0 ) C D 4 c g r l 7 L n r - C O C h C D 4 r q L n s . 0 L A D S D . 0 . 0 ' . 0 . 0 ' . 0 N - r - r -
319
, t L n r r r - r -
1 I• I V 0 4 . 1 c s f r O
in
( ) a ) W
aD 01 c r ) cq I
c t s 4
a ) , 2
• u • . 0
I
l• 1
1
I
' I 1n , , * 1 -• ) r ) -r i 0
C . )
4-
0 ,7 I
0 c , i , . 4
0 ul C s ,
CD ul
cD .°
CD 00
+3 + 1 44 + 1 + 1 + 1 0 0 0 0 0 Ln al 0 rn t r l • i . 1 CO 7% . I N. ' 0 . CD 1-
I
0 CD p 4
. 1 cn 44 3 N ,t C4
.7 . I N CV
CO 0 ' . CV
04 i ul CD • 1 Cg
-7 Co 01 u l CV ,
3 3 C ) N 0 u1 0 . .7
% .0 01 .0
c qI I I I I I I I ‹I
0
s .0 -, i ; _g. 1 . 2. , r e2
as c p i
c . . , .0)
N.
• • I X = o4
I a . ,
I a . ,
0 0 . 1
N-
I 4
g o
0: 3
gl0 c c 1 aP IL 4 4 4 4 4D I
Po
4
0
-r .
c -% N . so sc
0 CD C . N 1
0 ul 1 . 4
0 CD , . 4
0 CD . f
0 cD r -4
0 in . -4
CD .0
0 0 1
0 CD . 4
+I -1 4 41 0 0 cn 0 in in M NJ CI 1- 1- L r ‘
0 0 . . . I
1-1 +1 +' co 0 r -. I c y , i r l CO in CO 1- 1- 1-
0 CD 1 1
0 ul 4
N. in
1 0 . 0
0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 N. . 1 . -4 . . . 1 . . 4
+1 +1 +1 -i 1 i1 -I -1 1- I 1 1 +1 01 0 0 A 0 0 0 0 0 ( . 1 11 . 1 . 1 l fl . 1 c> in r . . . 1 . 0 t fl 4 " co L E .t 0 c : r % co 1- -1' . 1- . 1- -1 in u ") . 1 " . . /
) A . i
3N 3%
11 11 + 1 /- 1 0 0 ul 0i . n 0-) N. N. . 1 . . 1 - . 1 0 co -4 7% t N I 0 2, 7 u1 l • . 0 . 0 in
+1
+1
F i g . 8 5 c o n t d
R a d i o c a r b o n
c u 4 . )
N.
Ln
CD 0 CA r ,. N . N. i .n cn c) 01 . 1 . 4 co 01 . 4- c e l I I -4 01 Ci C . 1 : V NJ
4 1 1 1
e I 1 I
4 1 I I -I I I I 4 1 I I 1 1 4 1
> . 1 , I . 1 $ . 4 R I c t 1 a ) a )
0 1 . 4 r e 2
0 1 4 c t I 2
0 W c d 2
1 . 1
I 1
1 I 11
C 1 : 1 $ . 1 n i 2
c o c ) . i 1 4 c d c ; 2 2
> 1 4
1 1 1 1 1 1
0 4 1 1 . 4 0 0 P O › .4 . 1 C . 1 c o co • c o -, lc 1 . 4 f l , 1 1 X) I I c t i ›, c n 2 , i c a N . , , . 1 i t 0
V
0 1 0
cn 0
T . A z m a k
L e p e n s k i V i r
K a r a n o v o
> 1 4
I 1
S t r a t u m V I
1 1 I I
1 -1
S t r a t u m X
C l ) c t l _ c 0 ,
1 I
$ 4 • , -. 1
S t r a t u m I X
1 0
0 >
We
M a c e d o n i a n E N
c I C . ) e ei >
M a c e d o n i a n E N
« I C . ) e e 1 >
• O
CO 0 \ C« ./ r • • r •- co 00 00 0c . v o0
3 20
VZ, 3) D O
JO CO
3N C O
0 aN
• 1 T N
C I el 3N a%
,r )
0 N
0 \
0,
r-- 0 3 . 7 ', 0, 0, 0, 0
^. 0
^ -1
O W 4 0 4 1 C O W
4
,
J D r , J D J D C J o n 0 1 O D . I . I I i P 4 0 4 0 4
. 0 r , . , I 0 4
, f r, r , 1 P .
J D c m N, I P .
u ,
C J . I Z P n
O D 1I Z . 4
C l J D I f u l c p , c s i 4 r q 4 L n cn ce ) - N . r - r I I 1 1 1 1 I A 4 0 4 P L 1 g 4 g 4 P 4 g 4
.
WE
( J O Q ) W Q ) L I I 4 0 'O
a ) t . , . 4 1 o c . )
0
4 . 4
0 • • . 1 0 C . . ) W • M 4 D C . ) O W , I 4 I n m ) M n P 4
0 Z N 1 1 ,f c l r , i n
s 0 C O + I C A r q , c ) L n
C r ) C N + 1 J ' % , t i n L n
. 1 C A +1 C D c m , , 0 i n
. 12 % + 1 • I C O
u l L n
C D C D r . 03 C0 r , , , 1 -1 F 1 4 1 . I C D C D r , C O C . 4 U 1 C s 1 U l i n t r ) i n
C : 7 1 N . + 1 . 0 1 0 1 C l I f )
4 r l , + 1 7 1 , I C J L n
c m 1 1 00 30 , r , r , + 1 + 1 + 1 A , N i C D 0 1 O D O D C D ' . . : )C O u l 1- 1-
0 ‘ . 0 A , + 1 1 1 L i C D C ) C J C O A, 1- 1C O
5 t h m i l e n i a
C O W
1 1 a ) . 0 W , . I 4 -1 W W W C l ) 4 1 . , 1 0 W W W Q ) C D > 0 4 0 C O
0 C . / 3-1 C O
•W O 4 4
t i O
b e
f i r s t h a l f
› , O Q ) O C . ) 4 I
c v 4 . 4
C O
1 . 4 C J
J C
p u r p o s e .
C J C V
a n
1 1
c o m p a r t i v e
r
S t r a t u m V
S t r a t u m V
S t r a t u m V I A
S t r a t u m V I
z › .
U l J D A , D D C A C D C D C D C D C D C D
C a n H a s a n
C a t l H ü y ü k
4 1
C j 0 1
3 21
U I
r - C O 2,
I LLUSTRATIONS
P late
1 .
G eneral v iew o f t he i slet o f A gios Petros f rom t he n orthwest part o f t he b ay o f Kyra Panagia . T he opened cuttings c an
b e
s een a t
t he e dge o f t he
3 24
i sland .
P late
2 .
G eneral
v iew o f t he b ay o f K yra P anagia f rom t he s outh—east.
3 26
P late 3 .
O ne o f t he t wo v alleys o f K yra P anagia.
3 28
P late 4 a. 4 b.
V iew o f t he o pened c uttings f rom t he s outh. T he c ircular s tructure.
3 30
P late 5 .
A rchitectural
f eatures o f
3 32
S quare
I II.
P late 6 a.
A rchitectural
f eatures o f T I.
6 b.
A rchitectural
f eatures o f S quare I .
3 34
P late 7 a. 7 b.
D etail o f t he w all o f t he c ircular s tructure. T he w all
a long t he w estern f ace o f S quare I I.
3 36
P late
8 a.
M ass o f s ling
8 b.
T he w all
s tones
i n S quare
I .
i n S quare T .
P late 9 a. 9 h.
S tone i mplements f rom S quare I II H abitation f eatures
3 40
( detail).
f rom S quare I .
P late
1 0a.
N eolithic c hild
1 0b.
T he
b urial
B yzantine b urial
i n T i.
f ound
3 42
b etween S quare I a nd
I I.
P late
ha.
V ertical
s labs
i n S quare I V .
l ib.
W all
p aved
a rea
a nd
3 44
i n c utting MT.
P late
1 2 .
T he
n eolithic d eposit
3 46
i n c utting Z .
P late
1 3a.
T he a rched b uilding
1 3b.
T he
1 3c.
F allen s tones
" compacted
3 48
o f c utting Z .
s tratum" o f c utting Z . i n c utting Z .
P late 1 4.
H abitation f loors a nd
3 50
h earths
i n c utting Z .
P late
1 5a.
C hild
b urial
l ib.
A h uman
r esting o n t he b edrock i n c utting Z .
j aw f ound
i n t he
T . )?
s outh -east c orner o f c uttirg Z .
a
b
P late 1 7.
R ed-on-white p ainted p ottery.
3 56
b
G
e
t
h
j
I
m
P late
1 8a.
F ine m onochrome p ottery.
1 8b.
I mpressed w ares.
3 58
a
P late
1 9.
B lack-topped 1 .
p ottery a nd
P roto-Sesklo
3 60
p ieces
f rom
S tratum
K J
W
P late
2 0.
P ainted p ottery.
3 62
£3
P late
2 1.
P lastic d ecoration a nd v arious
3 64
f orms o f h andles.
o .
P late
2 2a.
V arious
2 2b.
B ases
f orms o f h andles.
f rom f ine p ottery.
3 66
o .
M I R J
P late
2 3.
C oarse b ases a nd f ragments o f m iniature v ases.
3 68
I BM
I RE .
4p . *
a
C
b
P late
2 5.
H ead o f a f igurine
f rom S tratum I II.
3 72
P late
2 6.
H eads o f a nthropomorphic a - b : S tratum I I. c - d : S tratum I .
3 74
f igurines.
S cale S cale
2 :1 2 :1
C d S CA LE 2 : 1
P late
2 7.
H ead o f a f igurine S tratum I II .
3 76
f rom t he u pper p art o f S tratum I I o r
#
I
P late
2 8 .
A r od-head
f igurine
f rom S tratum I II.
3 78
9 1." '' *e
CV
LL . '
P late
2 9.
H eads o f a nthropomorphic
f igurines.
a - b : S tratum I I o r I II. c - d : S tratum I .
3 80
a
C
d S CA LE
2 : 1
P late 3 0.
A f igurine o f b ird-like a ppearance f rom S tratum I II.
3 82
S CAL E 2 : 1
a - b:s c a l e '3 1
c - d :s c a le 2 : 1
P late 3 2a. 3 2b.
F ragment o f a f emale f igurine. C lay f oot o f a f igurine o r a n a ctual v ase.
3 86
C i
_ C I
P late 3 3a-b. 3 3c.
F ragments o f f at f emale f igurine. A s tone f igurine.
3 88
b
Q
C
S CALE 2 : 1
P late 3 4.
F ragments o f c lay f igurines.
3 90
a
c i
P late 3 5.
F ragments o f c lay f igurines a nd o ther c lay o bjects.
3 92
d
C
S
h
g
f
J
k
m
P late 3 6.
F ragments o f c lay f igurines o f v arious t ypes.
3 94
S
a
d
C
a
e
b
C
f
d
P late 3 7.
F ragments f igurines.
o f
c ruciform
3 96
t ype
f igurines
a nd
f at
f emale
a
1
d
e
f
g
h i
P late 3 8 .
C lay l adles,
p lain a nd d ecorated.
3 98
f
J
g
i
C
b
a
e
t
d
g
k
P late 4 0a. 4 0b.
C lay l adle d ecorated w ith r ed—on—white p ainted d esigns. M inyan p ieces f rom t he M iddle H elladic r ubbish p it.
4 02
W- A 1 .1-
-
P late 4 1.
C lay o bjects o f u ncertain c haracter.
4 04
C
g e
f
I
i
h
L
k
. 1
m
n
P late 4 2a. 4 2b.
B one t ools. S ea
s hells.
4 06
t
o r
P late 4 4 .
B one a wls.
4 10
F7 --M IR
1
a
d
e
a
b
C
f
d
e
g
I
P late 4 7a.
S ling
s tones.
4 7b.
S tone
i mplements.
4 16
a
P late 4 8 .
S tone a xes a nd
4 18
o ther u nspecified
s tone o bjects.
I I I I I
I II I
MI
MI
IN
P late 4 9a. 4 9b.
S tone c hisels a nd S tone a xes.
4 20
s mall a xes.
S E
i n
c _j 1 1 1 1 1E -:
P late 5 0.
O bsidian a nd
f lint
4 22
t ools.
a
P late 5 1.
O bsidian b lades.
4 24
l t e
P late
5 2 .
O bsidian a nd
4 26
f lint
b lades
a nd
t ools.
c l
r n
P late 5 3.
F ragments o f o bsidian a nd
4 28
f lint
b lades.
e C
o .
g
f
k
o
i
h
m
I
P
n
q
r s
t
U
V w x
Y