A Systematical Bibliography of Sallust (1879-1964) 9004014675, 9789004014671

Table of contents :
A SYSTEMATICAL BIBLIOGRAPHY OF SALLUST(1879-1964)
CONTENTS
I. A bibliography of bibliographies
A. General bibliographical handbooks
B. General annual publications
C. Sallust in the 'Jahresberichte i.iber die Fortschritte der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft'
D. Other publications concerning the bibliography of Sallust
E. Publications on special subjects
II. The manuscript tradition of Sallust's works
A. Invectiva in Ciceronem
B. Epistulae ad Caesarem
C. Catilina and Jugurtha
1. General studies
2. Studies dealing with single manuscripts or groups of manuscripts
Papyrus-fragments
Scholia
D. Historiae
III. Editions, commentaries, translations
A. Invectiva in Ciceronem
B. Epistulae ad Caesarem
C. Catilina and Jugurtha together
D. Catilina
E. Jugurtha
F. Historiae
1. All fragments
2. Orationes et epistulae
3. Palimpsest fragments
IV. Sallust
A. Life of Sallust
B. Sallust: his personality; historian or politician?
C. Sallust: the historian and the thinker
1. His conception of man and history (general works on Sallust)
2. The prologues
3. Influences of Greek authors
D. Sallust: the artist
1. General studies
2. The speeches
E. The language of Sallust
1. Lexicographica
2. General studies
3. Main characteristics: Archaisms, poetisms, vulgarisms, variatio sermonis, brevitas.
4. Word order and period structure Clausulae Copulative particles
5. Grammatical and syntactical questions; nouns, verbs
V. Studies on Sallust's works
A. Invectiva in Ciceronem
B. Epistulae ad Caesarem
C. Catilina
1. The Catilinarian Conspiracy; historical background; sources
2. Sallust's Cati/ina; its title and time of composition
3. Sallust's treatment of the subject
4. Special parts of the Cati/ina
D. Jugurtha
1. The Jugurthine war; historical background
2. Sallust's Jugurtha; date, general character, structure
3. Sallust's Jugurtha; chronology, topography, sources
4. Special parts of the Jugurtha
E. Historiae
1. History of the period concerned; the sources
2. Sallust's Historiae
3. Discovery and decyphering of fragments
4. Orationes et epistulae
F. Other works, sometimes supposed to have been written by Sallust
l. Empedoclea
2. Orationes
3. Corpus Caesarianum
VI. Critica et exegetica
A. Catilina
1. Notes discussed in the 'Bursian-Jahresberichte'
2. Bibliography of the notes ( order of Latin text)
3. Index of the notes.
B. Jugurtha
1. Notes discussed in the 'Bursian-Jahresberichte'
2. Bibliography of the notes ( order of Latin text)
3. Index of the notes.
C. Historiae
1. Notes discussed in the 'Bursian-Jahresberichte'
2. Bibliography of the notes (order of Latin text)
3. Index of the notes.
VII. Sallust's influence; allusions to Sallust in other writers .
A. General studies
B. Antiquity
1. Cicero,
2. Catullus,
3. Horace,
4. Livy, Trogus
Pompeius,
5. Seneca,
6. Tacitus, Aulus Gellius,
7. Ammianus Marcellinus,
8. Scriptores Historiae Augustae and other imitators of Sallust,
9. Minucius Felix, Lactantius, Augustinus, Hieronymus Hilarius, Claudianus.
C. Middle Ages
D. Renaissance
E. Modern times; teaching
Index of authors

Citation preview

A SYSTEMATICAL BIBLIOGRAPHY OF SALLUST

MNEMOSYNE BIBLIOTHECA CLASSICA BATAVA COLLEGERUNT B. A. VAN GRONINGEN, W. J. VERDENIUS, J. H. WASZINK BIBLIOTHECAE AB ACTIS FUIT FASCICULOSQUE EDENDOS CURAVIT W. J. VERDENIUS, HOMERUSLAAN

53,

ZEIST

SUPPLEMENTUM QUARTUM A. D.

LEEMAN,

A Systematical Bibliography of Sallust

(1879-1964)

LUGDUNI BATAVORUM E. J. BRILL 1965

A SYSTEMATICAL BIBLIOGRAPHY OF SALLUST (1879-1964) BY

A. D. LEEMAN Professor of Latin in the University of Amsterdam

Revised and Augmented Edition

LUGDUNI BATAVORUM E. J. BRILL 1965

Copyright 1965 by E. J. Brill, Leiden, Netherlands All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or translated in any form, by print, photoprint, microfilm or any other means without written permission from the publisher.

Printed in the Netherlands

INTRODUCTION This bibliography was originally compiled as a private help for my own studies in Sallust. When I was encouraged to have it published, it was impossible for me to adapt my materials to the requirements of Bibliography, as for example in the indications of publishers, the size, the number of pages of each volume. Consequently, the present work has no other pretentions than to provide the student of Sallust with a practical guide in the labyrinth of publications concerning this author for the last eighty years. A glance at the table of contents will reveal the principles of the system on which it is based. In the various sections, a chronological order has been observed. As often as possible, the items are followed by references to reviews and short indications of the contents. For obvious reasons of classification, many items occur in more than one section. Thus each section presents, in a nutshell, the history of one group of problems. For the period from 1879to 1964, I have endeavoured to give a complete list, with some exceptions which I indicate in loco. In general, I have excluded most school editions and most of the publications in other languages than English, French, German, the Scandinavian languages, Italian, Spanish, Russian, Latin or Greek. As it is, this bibliography includes almost one thousand publications. The data concerned, which have been compiled with the help of the bibliographical handbooks and other sources mentioned in the first section, have been verified, corrected and supplemented in various libraries in Holland, Britain and France. Of the latter, I mention those of the British Museum, of the Roman Society, London, the Bodleian Library, Oxford, and the files of L'annee philologique, Paris. Originally it was my plan only to publish a supplement to the Systematical Bibliography of Sallust {1879-1950), Leyden 1952, for the subsequent period. However, as it appeared that this bibliography was out of print, I decided to publish a new, augmented and corrected edition for the whole period 1879-1964. I thank professor K. Vretska (Graz), Sir Ronald Syme (Cambridge), Mlle Juliette Ernst (Paris) and my assistants G. Bouma and H. Pinkster for their valuable help. Bussum (J. F. Evertslaan 9), April 1965.

CONTENTS

I. A bibliography of bibliographies ................... nrs. 1-53 A. General bibliographical handbooks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-9 B. General annual publications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11- 13 C. Sallust in the 'Jahresberichte i.iber die Fortschritte der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14-22 D. Other publications concerning the bibliography of 23-42 Sallust ...................................... . 43-53 E. Publications on special subjects ................. . II. The manuscript tradition of Sallust's works .......... . A. Invectiva in Ciceronem ......................... . B. Epistulae ad Caesarem ......................... . C. Catilina and Jugurtha ......................... . 1. General studies ............................ . 2. Studies dealing with single manuscripts or groups of manuscripts ............................. . Papyrus-fragments ......................... . Scholia ................................... . D. Historiae ................. (vide II C 2 and VE 3) Ill. Editions, commentaries, translations ................ . A. Invectiva in Ciceronem ......................... . B. Epistulae ad Caesarem ......................... . C. Catilina and Jugurtha together .................. . D. Catilina ..................................... . E. Jugurtha . .................................... . F. Historiae .................................... . I. All fragments .............................. . 2. Orationes et epistulae ....................... . 3. Palimpsest fragments ....................... . IV. Sallust ......................................... . A. Life of Sallust ................................ . B. Sallust: his personality; historian or politician? ... . C. Sallust: the historian and the thinker ............ . 1. His conception of man and history (general works on Sallust) ................................ . 2. The prologues ............................. . 3. Influences of Greek authors: ................. . Thucydides, Xenophon, Demosthenes, Plato.

54-139 54-60 61-65 66-139 66-85 86-131 131-137 138-139 140-252 140-150 151-168 169-197 198-218 219-232 233-252 233-240 241-249 250-252 253-564 253-265 266-338 339-446 339-383 384-415 416-446

viii

CONTENTS

D. Sallust: the artist ............................. . 1. General studies ............................ . 2. The speeches .............................. . E. The language of Sallust ........................ . 1. Lexicographica ............................ . 2. General studies ............................ . 3. Main characteristics: ....................... . Archaisms, poetisms, vulgarisms, variatio sermonis, brevitas. 4. Word order and period structure ............. . Clausulae ................................. . Copulative particles ........................ . 5. Grammatical and syntactical questions; nouns, verbs ..................................... .

447-470 447-463 464-470 471-564 471-483 484-503 504-517 518-528 529-533 534-537 538-564

V. Studies on Sallust's works ......................... . 565-919 A. Invectiva in Ciceronem ......................... . 565-607 B. Epistulae ad Caesarem ......................... . 608-675 C. Catilina ..................................... . 676-765 l. The Catilinarian Conspiracy; historical background; sources ........................... . 676-698 2. Sallust's Cati/ina; its title and time of composition 699-724 3. Sallust's treatment of the subject ............. . 725-739 4. Special parts of the Cati/ina . ................. . 740-765 D. Jugurtha . .................................... . 766-844 l. The Jugurthine war; historical background .... . 766-779 2. Sallust's Jugurtha; date, general character, structure ...................................... . 780-801 3. Sallust's Jugurtha; chronology, topography, sources ................................... . 802-829 4. Special parts of the Jugurtha ................. . 830-844 E. Historiae .................................... . 845-906 1. History of the period concerned; the sources ... . 845-864 2. Sallust's Historiae . ......................... . 865-873 3. Discovery and decyphering of fragments ....... . 874-898 4. Oration es et epistulae ....................... . 899-906 F. Other works, sometimes supposed to have been written by Sallust ............................. . 907-919 l. Empedoc/ea ............................... . 907-915 2. Orationes ................................. . 916-917 3. Corpus Caesarianum . ....................... . 918-919 VI. Critica et exegetica ............................... . A. Cati/ina ..................................... .

920-1162 920-1003

CONTENTS

1. Notes discussed in the 'Bursian-Jahresberichte' .. 2. Bibliography of the notes (order of Latin text) ... 3. Index of the notes.

ix 920-924 925-1003

B. Jugurtha . .................................... . 1004-1107 1. Notes discussed in the 'Bursian-Jahresberichte' .. 1004-1009 2. Bibliography of the notes (order of Latin text) ... 1010-1107 3. Index of the notes. C. Historiae .................................... . 1108-1162 1. Notes discussed in the 'Bursian-Jahresberichte' .. 1108-1112 2. Bibliography of the notes (order of Latin text) ... 1113-1162 3. Index of the notes.

VII. Sallust's influence; allusions to Sallust in other writers . A. General studies ............................... . B. Antiquity .................................... . 1. Cicero, 2. Catullus, 3. Horace, 4. Livy, Trogus Pompeius, 5. Seneca, 6. Tacitus, Aulus Gellius, 7. Ammianus Marcellinus, 8. Scriptores Historiae Augustae and other imitators of Sallust, 9. Minucius Felix, Lactantius, Augustinus, Hieronymus Hilarius, Claudianus. C. Middle Ages ................................. . D. Renaissance ................................. . E. Modern times; teaching ....................... . Index of authors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page

1163-1252 1163-1164 1165-1222

1223-1232 1233-1234 1235-1252 103-109

ABB RE VIATIO NS AAHG: Anzeiger f. d. Altertumswissenschaft. AbhAkWWien: Abhandlungen der Akademie von Wissenschaften in Wien. AbhKBAkWMtinchen: Abhandlungen der koniglichen bayerischen Akademie von Wissenschaften in Mtinchen. ACl: L'Antiquite classique. AFL Bordeaux: Annales de la Faculte des Lettres a Bordeaux. AHR: American Historical Review. AIV: Atti dell'lnstituto Veneto di Scienze. AJPh: American Journal of Philology. ALL: Archiv filr lateinische Lexicographie. Ant: Die Antike. Ant AS: Antike. Alte Sprachen und deutsche Bildung. AR: Atene e Roma. ARW: Archiv filr Religionswissenschaft. ASNP: Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Ath: Athenaeum. BAGB: Bulletin de !'Association G. Bude. BBG: Blatter fiir das bayerische Gymnasialschulwesen. BCTH: Bulletin Archeologique du Comite de Travaux Historiques. BFC: Bolletino di filologia classica. BFS: Bulletin de la Faculte des Lettres de Strasbourg. BJ: Bursian-Jahresberichte = Jahresber. Uber die Fortschritte der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft. BMB: Bulletin bibliographique du Musee beige. BPhW: Berliner philologische Wochenschrift. BSL: Bulletin de la Societe de Linguistique de Paris. Civ. Catt.: Civilta Cattolica. Cl B: Classical Bulletin. CIJ: Classical Journal. Cl M: Classica et Mediaevalia ClN: Classici e Neolatini. CIPh: Classical Philology. CIQ: Classical Quarterly. CIR: Classical Review. CIW: Classical Weekly; Classical World. DLZ: Deutsche Literatur-Zeitung. Diss.: Dissertation, thesis. EHR: English Historical Review. Em: Emerita. EnsChr.: L'enseignement chretien. EPhK: Egyetemes Philologiai Kozlony. Er: Eranos. FF:

Forschungen und Fortschritte.

GArb: Geistige Arbeit. GIF: Giornale Italiano di Filologia. GI: Glotta. Gn: Gnomon.

ABBREVIATIONS

xi

GottN: Gottingen Nachrichten. Gy: Gymnasium. Hel: Helilcon H: Hermes. HG: Das humanistische Gymnasium. Hist. : Historia. HJ: Historisches Jahrbuch. HSt: Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. Hum: Humanites. HZ: Historische Zeitschrift. IL: Information litteraire. IP: L'instruction publique. Jahresbericht fiir Geschichtswissenschaft. Jahrbi.icher fiir klassische Philologie. JLZ: Jenaer Literatur Zeitung. JPh: Jahrbi.icher fi.ir Philologie. JPhVB: Jahrbi.icher des philologischen Vereins in Berlin (published with ZG, afterwards called Sokrates). JRS: Journal of Roman Studies. JS: Journal des savants. JGW:

JKIPh:

Kl:

Klio.

L: Latomus. LEC: Les etudes classiques. LF: Listy Filologicke. LSt: Leipziger Studien. LZB: Literarisches Zentralblatt. M: Museum. Maandblad voor Philologie en Geschiedenis. MAL: Memorie della classe di Scienze Morali e Storiche dell'Academia dei Lincei. MCI: II mondo classico. MES: Memoire de diplome d'etudes superieures de la Faculte de Paris. MH: Museum Helveticum. MHL: Mitteilungen aus der historischen Literatur. MIAC: Museo italiano di antichita classica. Mn: Mnemosyne. MVPhWien: Mitteilungen des Vereins klassischer Philologen in Wien. NJ: Neue Jahrbi.icher. NPhR: Neue Philologische Rundschau. NS: Nord und Si.id. NV: Nova et Vetera. NWzA: Neue Wege zur Antike. OHS: Die osterreichischen hoheren Schulen. q,,1:[I: q,1).o).oytK1] avlloyo; Ilaevaaa6;.

Ph: Philologus. PhA: Philologischer Anzeiger. PhQ: Philological Quarterly. PhSt: Philologische Studien. PhW: Philologische Wochenschrift. PP: La Parola del Passato. Pr: Prometheus. Pr.: Programm. PW: Pauly-Wissowa, Real-Enzyklopaedie. PZ: Piidagogisches Zentralblatt. Memosyne. Suppl. IV

2

xii

ABBREVIATIONS

R: Review(s), (!) important. RArch: Revue archeologique. RBPh: Revue beige de philologie. RC!: Rivista classica. RCr: Revue critique. REA: Revue des etudes anciennes. REC: Revue des etudes classiques. REL: Revue des etudes latines. RF: Rivista di filologia. RFC: Rivista di filologia classica. RFIC: Rivista di filologia e d'istruzione classica. RH : Revue historique. RhSt: Rhetorische Studien. RhM: Rheinisches Museum. RIGI: Rivista indo-greco-italica. RIL: Rendiconti dell'lnstituto Lombardo. RIPB: Revue de l'instruction publique en Belgique. RPh: Revue de philogie. RSA: Rivista di studi antichi. RSC: Rivista di studi classici. RSI: Rivista storica italiana. RSVR: Roma, Rivista di studi et di vita romana. R Tun: Revue tunesienne. RU: Revue universitaire. RUB: Revue de l'Universite de Bruxelles. SBAkW: Sitzungsberichte der Akademie von Wissenschaften. SBPhVer Berlin: Sitzungsberichte des philologischen Vereins in Berlin. Ser: Scriptorium. SIFC: Studi italiani di filologia classica. SO: Symbolae Osloenses. Sokr: Sokrates ( = ZG). T(P)APhA: Transactions (and Proceedings) of the American Philological Association. Tbn: Teubner. TG: Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis. VDI: Vestnik Drevnej Istorii. VDPh: Verhandlungen der Versammlung deutscher Philologe. WBI: Wiener Blatter. WJA: Wi.irzburger Jahrbi.icher fi.ir die Altertumswissenschaft. WKIPh: Wochenschrift fi.ir klassische Philogie. WSt: Wiener Studien. ZG: Zeitschrift fiir das Gymnasialwesen. ZOG: Zeitschrift fi.ir die osterreichischen Gymnasien.

I. A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF BIBLIOGRAPHIES A, GENERAL BIBLIOGRAPHICAL HANDBOOKS 1. FABRICIUS, J. A. - ERNEST!, J. A.: Bibliotheca latina, I. I, cap. IX (p. 234-247). Leipzig 1773-742 • Bibliography of old editions.

2. SCHWEIGER, F. L. A.: Handbuch der classischen Bibliographie, vol. II 2, p. 862-903. Leipzig 1832. Bibliography from the beginning of the 16th century to 1820.

3. ENGELMANN, W. - PREUSS, E.: Bibliotheca scriptorum classicorum, vol. II, p. 554-571. Leipzig 18828 • Bibliography 1700-1878.

4. KLUSSMANN, R.: Bibliotheca scriptorum classicorum et Graecorum et Latinorum, vol. II 2, p. 165-180. Leipzig 1913. Bibliography 1878-1896.

5. LAMBRINO, S.: Bibliographie de l'antiquite classique (1896-1914), I, p. 522-525. Paris 1951. Bibliography 1896-1914.

6. MAROUZEAU, J.: Dix annees de bibliographie classique, vol. I, p. 333336. Paris 1927. Bibliography 1914-1924, with short indications of contents and reviews.

7. CousIN, J.: Bibliographie de la langue latine (1880-1948). Paris 1951. Vide indicem nominum s. v. Sallustius.

8. O0TEGHEM, J. VAN: Bibliotheca Graeca et Latina, p. 260-266: Salluste. Namur, no date (1945?) 1). Gives some of the most important works on Sallust.

9. HERESCU, N. I.: Bibliographie de la litterature latine p. 59-65: Salluste. Paris 1943. Work very similar to nr. 8. B.

GENERAL ANNUAL PUBLICATIONS

11. Bibliotheca philologica classica. Leipzig 1874. Published as a supplement of 'Bursian-Jahresberichte' (vide Section C), from 1874 onward; with references to reviews. 1}

Published earlier in REC 1936.

2

A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF BIBLIOGRAPHIES

12. MAROUZEAU, J.: L'annee philologique. Paris 1924, etc. From 1924 onward; with short indications of contents and reviews.

13. RousE, W. H. D., and others: The Year's Work in Classical Studies. London 1906-1950. Written in the form of a systematic survey.

C. SALLUST IN THE 'JAHRESBERICHTE UBER DIE FORTSCHRITTE DER KLASSISCHEN ALTERTUMSWISSENSCHAFT' (BURSIAN-JAHRESBERICHTE, LEIPZIG 1874 etc.).

14. WoLFFLIN, ED.: Jahresbericht iiber Nepos und Sallust 1873-1874, BJ 2 (1875), p. 1661-8. Deals only with some works on Sallust's language.

15. EussNER, A.: Bericht iiber die neueste Literatur zu den romischen Historikern (ausser Tacitus) 1874-1877, BJ 10 (1878), p. 152-207. Separate reviews, no general considerations.

16. MAURENBRECHER, B.: Bericht iiber die C. Sallustius Crispus betreffende Literatur 1878-1898, BJ 101 (1900), p. 165-248. Sections: Sallust's personality, the Coni. Cat., the B. Jug., the mss., editions, textual criticism. Deals thoroughly with the problems involved.

17. MAURENBRECHER, B.: Idem {Fortsetzung); Sallusts Historiae. BJ 113 (1902), p. 228-272. Continuation of nr. 16. Unfortunately this 'Jahresbericht' has never been finished; the Sections: language, imitators, Epistulae ad Caes., Invect. in Cic. are lacking.

18. KURFESS, A.: Bericht iiber die Literatur zu Sallust aus den Jahren 1899-1918. BJ 183 (1920), p. 124-194.

Sections: Sallust's personality, his works, ms. tradition, editions, textual criticism, language, imitators, Epp. ad Caes., Inv. in Cic.; Kurfess' 'Jahresberichte' are reliable and objective; they contain many quotations from the works concerned.

19. KURFESS, A.: Bericht iiber die Literatur zu Sallust aus den Jahren 1919-1922. BJ 192 (1922), p. 46-63. Same sections as nr. 18.

20. KURFESS, A.: Sallustbericht iiber die Jahre 1922-1926. BJ 212 (1927), p. 1-20. Same sections as nr. 18.

21. KURFESS, A.: Sallustbericht iiber die Jahre 1926-1935. BJ 252 {1936), p. 1-88. Sections: Sallust's works, ms. tradition, language, style, imitators, Epp. ad Caes., Inv. in Cic., critica et exegetica, 'Sallustbild'.

A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF BIBLIOGRAPmES

3

22. KURFESS, A.: Sallust. Bericht iiber das Schrifttum der Jahre 19351937. BJ 269 (1940), p. 1-69. Sections: Sallust's life, his models (Thuc. etc.), ms. tradition, language, influence, 'Sallustbild'. D.

OTHER PUBLICATIONS CONCERNING THE BIBLIOGRAPHY OF SALLUST

23-25. MEUSEL, H.: Jahresberichte des philologischen Vereins zu Berlin. Sallust. ZG 1875; 1877; 1880. Contain important reviews.

26-29. SCHLEE, F.: idem. ZG 1890; 1895; 1898; 1900. Important reviews often representing opinions different from Maurenbrecher's (nrs. 16, 17).

30. KROLL, W.: Literaturbericht iiber Sallust. PZ 12 (1932), p. 31-33. 31. PEREMANS, W.: Nieuwe Literatuur over Sallustius. PhSt 6 (1934-35), p. 147-152; 7 (1935-36), p. 40-66. The studies on Sallust published in the years 1929-1935.

32. VRETSKA, K.: vide nr. 1245. 1935. Recent publications on Sallust.

33. BORST, F. - HAAS, H.: Literaturbericht iiber Caesar, Livius, Cato, Sallustius. Gy 1939, p. 130 sqq. 34. FuNAIOLI, G.: Nuovi orientamenti della critica sallustiana. Studi di lett. ant. II I p. 45-70. Bologna 1948. Recent studies on Sallust have proved that he must be considered as a serious, though passionate, historian, and not as a biased political writer.

35. FucHs, H.: Riickschau und Ausblick im Arbeitsbereich der lateinischen Philologie. MH 4 (1947), p. 147 sqq., Anm. 102. 36. PARATORE, E.: Rassegna di studi sallustiani. ASNP 19 (1950), p. 155-175. Critical study of publications by Romano (146), Perrochat (418), Paladini (332).

37. BUCHNER, K. (- HOFMANN, J. B.): Lateinische Literatur und Sprache in der Forschung seit 1937; p. 78-90 Sallust. Bern 1951. Important survey dealing mainly with recent publications by Seel (nr. 303), Emout (nr. 194), Vretska (nr. 713), Posch! (nr. 361), Rambaud (nr. 406), Howald (nr. 326), and Last (nr. 737).

38. LEEMAN, A. D.: A Systematical Bibliography of Sallust (1879-1950), Mn Suppl. IV. Leiden 1952. 39. PLATNAUER, M.: Fifty Years of Classical Scholarship. Oxford 1954. Ch. XIII The Roman Historians, by A. H. McDonald.

4

A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF BIBLIOGRAPHIES 40. MALCOVATI, E.: Rassegna di studi sallustiani. Ath 33 (1955), p. 365-373. Reviews of Kurfess (I 96), Pab6n (217), Biichner (793).

41. DIETERICH, H.: Sallust. Auswahlbericht iiber die Literatur 19451956. Gy 64 (1957), p. 533-554. I Echtheit der Invektive und der Epp. ad Caesarem. II Die Proomien. III Der Autbau des Bell. Jug. IV Sallusts Vorbilder. Anhang: Kurfess (196), neuere Literatur.

42. MALCOVATI, E.: Rassegna di studi sallustiani. Ath 36 (1958), p. 171-178. Reviews of Paladini (249), Pab6n (231), Kurfess (148).

E. PUBLICATIONS ON SPECIAL SUBJECTS 43. CESAREO, E.: Le traduzioni italiane delle monografie di Sallustio. Palermo 1924. R: Klotz PhW 1925 p. 152. Kurfess BJ 212 p. 5.

44. o'AGOSTINO, V.: II pensiero e l'arte di Sallustio nell'odierna critica italiana. Per lo st. d. ant. lat. p. 30-35. Torino 1936. 45. CORDIER, A.: Bibliographie de Salluste, La conjuration de Catilina. B. F. L. Lille, suppl. Revue de l'Hist. de la Philo!. et de l'Hist. de la Civilis. (Lille 1939), p. 12-15. 46. SCHINDLER, A.: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte des Sallustbildes. Diss. Breslau 1939. Gives valuable information on the conception of Sallust and his works since the times of the Renaissance.

47. LEHNERT, G.: Bericht iiber die Literatur zu den lateinischen Deklamationen bis 1914; 2. Sallustii in Ciceronem et invicem invectivae. BJ 183, p. 245-50. 48. KURFESS, A.: Jahresberichte des philologischen Vereins zu Berlin (Sokrates) 49, 2 (1924), II. Sallusts offene Briefe an Caesar (Jahre 1920-23).

49. LAST, H.: vide nr. 622, p. 88 sq. and p. 162. 1923. A complete bibliography of the Epistulae ad Caesarem from 1567 (Lipsius) to 1923 (Klotz).

50. CHOUET, M.: vide nr. 648, p. XIII-XIX, 1950.

A critical bibliography of the Epistulae from 1868 (Jordan) to 1948 (Paladini).

51. KURFESS, A.: vide nr. 148, praef. IX bibl. Inv. 1950-1962. 52. KURFESS, A.: vide nr. 167, praef. IX-XI bib!. Epp. ad Caes.1868-1961. 53. KURFESS, A.: vide nr. 196, praef. XVI-XVIII bibl. Cat. Jug. Hist. 1938-1956.

II. THE MANUSCRIPT TRADITION OF SALLUST'S WORKS A. INVECTIVA IN CICERONEM 54. JORDAN, H.: Die Invektiven des Sallust und Cicero. H 11 (1876), p. 305-31. R: Eussner BJ 10 p. 202 sqq.

55. PETSCHENIG, M.: Handschriftliches zu Cicero und Pseudo-Sallustius. ZOG 34 (1883), p. 1-7.

56. CsEREP, J.: vide nr. 117; 1903. 57. PIRRONNE, N.: Codices latini qui in publica bybliotheca Drepanensi adservantur. SIFC 13 (1905), p. 61. 58. KURFESS, A. : De Sallustii in Ciceronem et invicem invectivis. Diss. Berlin 1913. R: Stangl WklPh 31 (1914) p. 290 sq. Klotz BPhW 1915, p. 79 sq.

59. KURFESS, A.: vide nr. 148; praefatio. 19624• 60. MICHELLY, R.: Zu Textkritik u. Verfassersfrage bei den Invektiven des Sallustius und Cicero. SBPhVerBerlin 1936-7, p. 14-18. R: Kurfess BJ 269 p. 52-56 (full report). The ms. Metz nr. 500 (X-Xlth cent.).

B. EPISTULAE AD CAESAREM SENEM 1) 61. AHLBERG, A.

w.: vide nr. 77, p. 104-18. 191 I.

62. HAULER, E.: vide nr. 108; p. 129-30. 1895. 63. KURFESS, A.: Zu Sallust IV. Lesearten aus einem alten Leipziger Druck zu den Epistulae ad Caesarem senem de republica. Ph W 1921, p. 597-9. Collation from an old printed edition, apograph of the Editio Romana (1475).

64. KURFESS, A.: vide nr. 167: praefatio. 19626 • 65. SEEL, 0.: vide nr. 303; Anhang (p. 87-90): Die Briefe Sallusts im Altertum. 1930. 1) Preserved in one single ms., Vat. 3864, together with the Orationes et Epistulae from Sallust's historical works. Compare, therefore, Section II C 2.

6

THE MANUSCRIPT TRADITION OF SALLUST'S WORKS C. CATILINA AND IUGURTHA 1. General Studies:

66. DIETSCH, R. : vide nr. 180: I p. 1-132: Commentationes. R: Wolfflin Ph 1861 p. 519-48. (!) Develops Roth's distinction between three classes of mss., later designated as mutili, integri, interpolati.

67. JORDAN, H.: vide nr. 181: praefatio. 18873. R: MaurenbrecherBJ 101 p.190sq. WirzZG 1877 p. 272sq. Hauler ZOG 1887 p. 834-41. Schlee JPhVB 1890 p. 60 sqq. The text has to be based on the mutili only (contra Dietsch); the integri are interpolated mutili, and so is V. Most editors of the XIXth century followed Jordan and accepted the superiority of P.

68. WIRZ, R.: De fide atque auctoritate codicis Sallustii qui Parisinis in Bibi. Imperiali n. 1576 [A] asservatur commentatio. Aarau 1867. Against Jordan's thesis on the superiority of P.

69. ANHALT, 0.: Quae ratio in libris recensendis Sallustianis recte adhiberi videatur. Diss. Jena 1876. R: Eussner BJ 10 p. 157 sqq. Against Jordan's thesis.

70. VOGEL, F.: Quaestionum Sallustianarum pars II. Acta Semin. philol. Erlang. II, 1881. R: Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 203. On p. 413-26 the 'fata' of Sallust's works until the end of the Middle Ages are traced in order to establish a firm basis for the recensio.

71. NITZSCHNER, A.: De locis Sallustianis qui apud scriptores et grammaticos veteres leguntur. Diss. Gottingen 1884. R: Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 201 sq. Scheindler ZOG 1885 p. 207-10. The materials for the history of Sallust's text in Antiquity.

72. KUHLMANN, L.: Quaestiones Sallustianae criticae. Pr. Oldenburg 1887. R: Opitz Wk!Ph 1888 p.}397/9. Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 192. Friedrich NPhR 1887 p. 98-107. Defends Jordan's thesis.

73. WIRZ, H.: C. Sallusti Crispi libri de hello Jugurthino partem extremam c. 103-112. Zilrich 1897. R: Maurenbrecher BPhW 1898 p. 1320-7; BJ 101 p. 194 sqq. Schlee JPhVB

1898 p. 101 sq. Hauler ZOG 1899 p. 211-15. Opitz WklPh 1899 p. 492-6. With Prolegomena on the ms. tradition; refutation of Jordan's thesis. Fails, however, to establish the affiliation of the mss. Compare nrs. 74 and 76.

74. MAURENBRECHER, B.: vide nr. 16: p. 190 sqq. 1900. Sharp criticism of the prevailing conception of ms. tradition. The affiliation of the mss. is the first thing to be investigated. V is greatly underrated.

75. HAULER, E.: Sallustzitate bei Fronto. RhM 54 (1899), p. 161-170.

THE MANUSCRIPT TRADITION OF SALLUST'S WORKS

7

76. MAURENBRECHER, B. : Sallustiana, 1. Heft 1 ): Die Oherlieferung der Jugurthalticke. Halle 1903. R: Schlee DLZ 1904 p. 405-6. Opitz WklPh 1904 p. 735-6 and BPhW 1904 p. 1641-2. Weinberger NPhR 1904 p. 441-3. Kurfess BJ 183 p. 154-7. Ms. tradition of Jug. 103, 2-112, 3, lacking in the mutili; distinction between the integri and the suppleti; starting points for the recensio of Sallust's works.

77. AHLBERG, A. W.: Prolegomena in Sallustium. Goteborg 1911. R: Beck MPh 1916 p. 167. Kurfess BJ 183 p. 157-61.

I de ratione codicurn, II de testimoniis veterum scriptorum, III variae adnotationes. Highly important work, the first to establish a reliable recensio as a foundation for an edition (vide nr. 188).

78. HoHNE, E.: Die Geschichte des Sallusttextes im Altertum. Diss. Miinchen 1927. R: Wessner PhW 1929 p. 434-445 (!) Jachrnann DLZ 1929 p. 753-5. Emout RPh 1929 p. 326. Johnson CIR 1928 p. 236. Weyman HJ 1928 p. 123. Kurfess BJ 252 p. 17-24. An investigation into the very roots of ms. tradition. Its results are not generally accepted and differ to some extent from Zimmerrnann's (nr. 79).

79. ZIMMERMANN, R.: Der Sallusttext im Altertum. Miinchen 1929. R: Wessner PhW 1931 p. 1449-59 (!) Weyman HJ 1932 p. 99. Constans REL 1932 p. 265-8. Faider RBPh 1932 p. 148. Cary CIR 1932 p. 45. Castiglioni Ath. 1932 p. 89 and RFIC 1932 p. 262-3. Ernout BSL 1932 p. 66 and RPh 1933 p. 128. Gigli BFC 1932 p. 185-90. Galletier REA 1934 p. 282-3. Kurfess BJ 252 p. 17 sqq. and 269 p. 1 sqq. Work of the same scope as nr. 78, but considered to be better.

80. PAB6N, J. M.: Sohre la tradici6n del texto de Sallustio. Em 1 (1933), p. 18-101. In mss. group X an alien text has intruded, cognate with the tradition of the integri recentiores (comp. nr. 81).

81. PAB6N, J. M.: Sohre la tradici6n del texto de Sallustio II. Em 2 (1934), p. 1-14. Continuation of nr. 80.

82. ERNOUT, A.: vide nr. 194: Preface p. 36-48. 1946. 83. PERL, G.: Probleme der Sallust-Oherlieferung. FF 33 (1959), p· 56-60. The indirect tradition has been overestimated. The manuscript tradition deserves closer study.

84. TERZAGHI, N. : A proposito di tradizione indiretta (Nonio e Sallustio). BPEC 9 (1961), p. 3-9. Nonius has preserved important Iectiones.

85. KURFEss, A.: vide nrs. 148, 167, 196. Praefationes.

1)

A second volume has never been published.

8

THE MANUSCRIPT TRADITION OF SALLUST'S

WORKS

2. Studies dealing with single manuscripts or groups of manuscripts; papyrus fragments 1) 86. JORDAN, H.: Die Oberlieferung der Reden und Briefe aus Sallusts Historien. RhM 18 (1863), p. 584 sqq. Vat. 3864.

87. WIRZ, R. : vide nr. 68, 1867. 88. DIECK, F. C. T.: De ratione quae inter Sallustianos codices Vaticanum n. 3864 [VJ et Parisinum n. 500 [P] intercedat. Jena 1872. 89. LISSA, L.: Due manoscritti di Sallustio della Biblioteca di Fermo. Fermo 1872. 90. BOESE, G.: De fide et auctoritate codicis Sallustiani Vat. 3864. Diss. Gottingen 1874. R: Eussner BJ 10 p. 155-7.

91. UNDSET, I. : Fragmenter af et Sallusthandskrift i det norske rigsarkiv. Nordisk. Tidskr. f. Filol. N.R. 3 (1877-8), p. 69-74. Comp. nr. 120.

92. ScHEPPS, G.: Zwei Maihinger Handschriften. Pr. Dinkelsbilhl 1878. R. Strelitz PhA 13 p. 555.

93. BONNET, M. : Die Handschriften von Montpellier H. 360 und Paris. lat. 10195 [D]. H 14 (1879) p. 157-9. R: Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 197.

94. LANGE, L. : Ein unbekannter alter Druck von Sallustii orationes et epistulae. LSt 2 (1879), p. 290-8. A collation of this is given by Kurfess (nr. 123).

95. HOFMEISTER, A.: Zur Handschriftenkunde des Sallust. Ph 39 (1880), p. 363-6. R: Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 198. Mss. in Rostock.

96. KUHLMANN, L.: De Sallusti codice Paris. 500. Pr. Oldenburg 1881. R: Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 191. Compares P1 [AJ and B, following Jordan's thesis.

97. WAECHTER, G.: De Sallustii libro Vat. 3864 recensendo. Diss. TUbingen 1881. 98. CONSTANS, L.: vide nr. 182, preface p. 2. 1893 3 • R: Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 192. Three codices Phillippici, comp. nr. 99. 1) Single pages of important mss. are reproduced by Chatelain: Paleographie des classiques latins; 52, 1 [PJ, 52,2 [AJ, 53 [DJ, 54,2 [VJ, 55 [QJ.

THE MANUSCRIPT TRADITION OF SALLUST'S WORKS

9

99. ROSE, V.: Handschriftenverzeichnis der konigl. Bibi. z. Berlin, XII, l, p. 442. The Phillippici of Constans (nr. 98).

100. KLIMSCHA, Ph.: Sallustianische Miscellen. Pr. Kremsier 1882, p. 3-15. R: Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 191. Compares P and P 1 [A] and opposes Jordan's thesis.

IOI. STANGL, Th.: Die Bibliothek Ashburnham, p. 223-5: Sallustius. Ph 45 (1886), p. 201-36. Comp. nr. 114.

102. PRAMMER, J.: C. Sallustius Crispus, Werke, Vorwort p. 1 sqq and 36 sqq. Wien 1896. R: Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 198. 17 mss. from Vienna, apparently worthless.

103. HAULER, Eo.: JORDAN, C. Sallusti Crispi opera (nr. 145), angezeigt von - . ZOG 38 (1887) p. 834-841. R: Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 199. V is of much higher value than Jordan supposes and represents an old independent tradition.

104. SABBADINI, R.: Sallustius Ovidius Plinius Germanicus Claudianus cum novis codicibus collati atque emendati. MIAC 3(1888),p. 69 sqq. R: Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 199. Two letters by Petrus Decembrius (1435 and 1439), containing the Epistula Pompei, in a text based on V (comp. nr. 110).

105. SCHNORR VON CAROLSFELD, H.: Ober die Reden und Briefe bei Sallust. Preisschrift Leipzig 1888 1). R: Hauler ZOG 1889 p. 308 sqq. Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 178 sq. Opitz WklPh 1889 p. 63-5. Deals with V, which he thinks incomplete.

106. HAMANN: Bruchstiicke einer Sallusthandschrift in der Dombibliothek zu Trier. Pr. Hamburg 1893. R: Schlee JPhVB 1895 p. 106-7. Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 197. Ms. containing Cat. 23, 3-30, 7; Jug. 84, 2-85, 39; 91, 1-95, 3 (comp. nr. 107).

107. OPITZ, TH.: Die Trierer Sallusthandschrift. JklPh 147 (1893), p. 853-5. Studies the fragments of nr. 106 and their affiliation.

108. HAULER, E. : Junge Handschriften und alte Ausgaben zu Sallust. WSt 17 (1895), p. 103-121. R: Schlee JPhVB 1898 p. 100 sqq. Maurenbrecher BJ 101. v• and v• do not derive from V, but from old printed editions (1475 and 1476-8).

109. HAULER, E.: Zur Sallustkritik. WSt 17 (1895), p. 122-151. R: Schlee JPhVB 1898 p. 150 sqq. Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 199. Additional remarks on Jordan• (comp. nr. 103), concerning the value of V (continued in nr. 113).

-----

1) p. 1-47: Diss. Miinchen 1886.

10 110.

THE MANUSCRIPT TRADITION OF SALLUST'S SABBADINI,

p. 213-5.

WORKS

R.: L'epistola sallustiana di Pompeio. BFC 2 {1896),

R: Maurenbrecher BJ IOI p. 199. The text of the Ep. Pompei in a letter of Petrus Decembrius (comp. nr. 104).

11 l. WIRZ, H.: Der codex Nazarianus des Sallustius. H 32 (1897), p. 202-9. R: Schlee JPhVB 1898 p. 100-114. Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 193. Discovery of the N of Gruter, thought lost, and of high importance.

112. W1Rz, H.: Die codices Palatini des Sallustius und Beitrage zur Geschichte des Textes. H 33 (1898), p. 109-18. R: Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 196. Schlee JPhVB 1900 p. 309 sqq. Deals with the suppleti; Jug. 44, 5 belongs to the original text, Cat. 6, 2 has been inserted from Augustine. The Palatine mss. are to be identified with Gruter's Pal. 2-12. Comp. nr. 121.

113. HAULER, E.: Zur Sallustkritik II. WSt 21 (1899), p. 305-19. Continuation of nr. 103.

114. OPITZ, TH. : Der codex Ashburnhamiensis des Sallustius. Ph Suppl. VII (1899) 3, p. 589-90. R: Schlee JPhVB 1900 p. 309 sqq. Compare nr. IOI. A ms. without much value.

115. SCHLEE, F.: Zwei Berliner Sallusthandschriften [H]. Pr. Sorau 1899. R: Opitz WklPh 1900 p. 180-2. Maurenbrecher BPhW 1902 p. 457-62.

116. CSEREP, J.: Codicem Sall. Albae-Juliensem praecipuis integrorum respondere. EPhK 26 (I 902), p. 449-54. 117. CsEREP, J.: Aliquot codices Sallustiani contenduntur. EPhK 27 (I 903), p. 193-201. 118. CSEREP, J.: De Posoniensi codice Sallustiano. EPhK 28 (1904). 119. ScHEINDLER, A.: Eine noch unbeniitzte Sallusthandschrift. Wiener Eranos 1909, p. 200-12. Ms. of St. Paul in Kiirnten.

120. MARSTRANDER, C.: Bruchstiicke einer Sallusthandschrift in dem norwegischen Reichsarchiv. RhM 62 (1907), p. 108-I 5. Comp. nr. 91.

121. AHLBERG, A. W.: De duo bus codicibus Palatinis Sallustianis. Er 9 (1909), p. 137-163. On the codices discovered by Wirz (nr. 112).

122. MANITIUS, M.: Zu Sallusts Jugurtha. Ph. 71 (1912), p. 313-4. Rotomagensis 1470 (X-XI), contains Jug. 13, 9-15, 2.

123. KURFESS, A.: Zu Sallust III. Lesearten eines alten Leipziger DrucksBPhW 40 (1920), p. 1172-4. Collation of an old printed edition of the orationes et epistulae. Comp. nr. 94.

THE MANUSCRIPT TRADITION OF SALLUST'S WORKS

11

124. ULLMANN, B. L.: The Vatican manuscript of Caesar, Pliny and Sallust, and the library of Corbie. PhQ 1 (1922), p. 17-22. R: Klotz PhW 1923 p. 58. Sabbadini BFC. 1922 p. 112.

Vat. 3864 originated in Corbie, as is shown by a catalogue of the Xllth century.

125. PAB6N, J. M.: Un mutilus suppletus de Sallustio. Em 2 (1934), p. 257-62. R: PhW 1935 p. 757. Ms. Escurial M, III, XI containing the Bell. Jug. in a text belonging to tradition

n.

126. BouTEMY, A.: Notice sur le manuscrit 749 de Ia bibliotheque municipale de Douai. L 1939, p. 183-206, p. 264-298. Contains 45 chapters of the Coni. Cat.

127. VERNET-BOURCEL, M. TH.: Quelques manuscrits de classiques latins a la bibliotheque universitaire de Louvain. Mel. Grat II Paris 1949, p. 351-86. On 14 manuscripts lost in 1940, among which there is one of Sallust. (p. 386).

128. ULLMANN, B. L.: A list of classical manuscripts (in an eight-century codex) perhaps from Corbie. Ser. 8 (1954), p. 24-37. Ms. Berlin Diez. B. Sant. 66, a.o. Sallust.

129. SALVATORE, A.: De duobus Sallusti codicibus Bruxellensibus. Ser. 8 (1954), p. 38-60. Description and collation of mss. 10057-10062 and 10034-10037. Mutili suppleti of the Xlth cent.

130. MARCO, F. DE: Una dedica in versi latini di un codice Sallustiano. Aevum 32 (1958), p. 504-508. 131. N.B. In 1939 a ms. of Sall. (IX or X) was discovered by a member of the Institut de Recherche et d'Histoire des Textes in the Collection Batthyani (Rumania); comp. Mem. Marouzeau (1943) p. 451. Papyrus fragments: 132. GRENFELL, B. P. and HUNT, A. S.: The Oxyrhynchus Papyri VI nr. 884. (1908). Papyrus fragment Cat. 6, 2-7; date: 5th century. Comp. nrs. 133, 134.

133. AHLBERG, A. W.: Ett papyrusfragment af Sallustius. Er 9 (1909), p. 13-29. 134. PELLINI, S.: Sallustio, Cati!. VI, 2. ClN 7(1911), p. 81-2. 135. HUNT, A. S.: Catalogue Rylands Library I (1911) nr. 42. A few words from Jug. 31, 7; date: 4th century. Identified by E. A. Lowe: Codices latini antiquiores II nr. 223.

136. VITELLI, G.: Papri della societa italiana. I (1912) nr. 110. Papyrus fr. Cat. 10, 4-7; date: 4th century.

12 137.

THE MANUSCRIPT TRADITION OF SALLUST'S WORKS LEHMANN, P.: Antike Fragmente von Sallusts Bellum Jugurthinum. SBAkW Berlin 1934, p. 19-24.

R: Kroll Gn 1935 p. 334. Kurfess BJ 252 p. 86-7. A few letters from Jug. 43, 3-4 and 44, 4; more from Jug. 49, 5-6 and 50, 3-4: 4th cent.

138.

Scholia: HEDICKE, E.: Varia II: Scholia in Caesarem et Sallustium. Pr. Quedlinburg 1879.

139.

MOLLWEIDE:

Ober die Glossen zu Sallust. Pr. Strassburg 1888.

R: Scheindler DLZ 1888 p. 720. Maurenbrecher BJ IOI p. 203-4. D. HISTORIAE

For the ms. containing the orations and epistles (V), see section II C, 2. For the palimpsest and papyrus fragments see section VE, 3.

III. EDITIONS (E), COMMENTARIES (C), TRANSLATIONS (T)

1)

A. INVECTIVA IN CICERONEM 140. HOERNEN, A.: AC. Sallustio invectiva contra M. Tullium Ciceronem, accedit Ciceronis responsio. Koln, circa 1471. This seems to be the first printed edition.

141. ALDUS et ASULANUS: vide nr. 174. 1509. 142. (C) CORTIUS, G.: vide nr. 235. 1724. 143. (C) HAVERCAMP,

s.: vide nr.

176. 1742.

144. (E) SCHEINDLER, A.: vide nr. 183. 1884. 145. (E) JORDAN, H.: C. Sallustius Crispus ... Accedunt incerti rhetoris invectivae Tullii et Sallustii personis tributae. Berlin 18873 • (vide nr. 181).

146. (C) ROMANO, D.: Sallustio Minore. Invectiva in Ciceronem. Epistulae ad Caesarem. Studio introduttivo e commento. Palermo 1948. R: Emout RPh 1949 p. 183-4. Marouzeau REL 1948 p. 354-5. Malcovati Ath 1948 p. 354-5. Paratore nr. 36.

147. (ET) KURFESS, A.: Sallusts Invektive gegen Cicero, ein Pamphlet aus dem Jahre 54 v. Chr. Gottingen 1927. Text with apparatus criticus, parallel passages, German translation.

148. (E) KuRFESS, A.: Appendix Sallustiana II. In Ciceronem et invicem Invectivae. Tbn., ~zig 19141, 19502 , 19583 , 19624 • R: Klotz BPhW 19JJ p. 79-81. Thomas RCr 1914 p. 66-7. Chouet REL 1950 p. 378. Rostagni RFIC 1951 p. 371-3. Leeman M 1951 p. 102-3. Dain BAGB 1951 p. 90. Malcovati Ath 1951 p. 141-3. Emout RPh 1951 p. 280. Jax AAHG 1951 p. 215. Bardon L 1951 p. 64. Clausen ClW 1953 p. 154. Malcovati Ath 1958 p. 175. Rambaud REL 1958 p. 349-50. Emout RPh 1959 p. 338. Malcolm CR 1959 p. 292. Marouzeau REL 1962 p. 318. Vretska AAHG 1964 p. 40-1. With praefatio, apparatus criticus, parallel passages, index nominum, index vocabulorum potiorum.

149. (ETC) VRETSKA, K.: Sallust. Invektive und Episteln. I Einleitung. Text und Obersetzung. II Kommentar. Wortindex zur Invektive. Heidelberg 1961. 1 ) This section has no aim to be complete; many of the innumerable editions for the use in schools have been omitted and only the most important translations in English, French or German are recorded. For the Italian translations see Cesareo (nr. 43). A number of old editions are mentioned in Schindler's book (nr. 46).

14

EDITIONS, COMMANTARIES, TRANSLATIONS R: Paladini L 1961 p. 855-6. V. d. Woestijne AC 1961 p. 605-6. La Penna Gn 1962 p. 467-80. Andre RPh 1963 p. 341-2. Wasserman CIJ 1963 p. 186. Biichner Gy 1963 p. 445-9. Marache REA 1962 p. 205-6. Leeman Mn 1964 p. 424-5.

150. (ETC) ERNOUT, A.: Pseudo-Salluste. Lettres Bude, Paris 1962.

a Cesar. Invectives.

R: Marouzeau REL 1962 p. 303-5. Earl CIR 1963 p. 172-3. Paladini L 1963 p. 292-4. Andre RPh 1962 p. 344. Marache REA 1962 p. 471-2. Frassinetti Petl 1962 p. 55-62. B.

EPISTULAE AD CAESAREM

151. Editio Princeps Romana. Roma 1475. 152. Editio Mantuana. Mantua 1476-8. 153. (C) CoRTIUS, G.: vide nr. 235. 1724. 154. (C) HAVERCAMP,

s.: vide nr. 176. 1742.

155. (E) SCHEINDLER, A.: vide nr. 183. 1884. 156. (E) JoRDAN, H.: vide nr. 181: ... incerti rhetoris suasoriae ad Caes. senem de rep. Berlin 188?3. 157. CoNSTANS, L.: vide nr. 182: ... suivie de la lettre et du discours Cesar. 1893 3 •

a

158. (CT) VITTORI, G.: Volgarizzamento delle due epistole de ordinanda republica. Aquila 1897. Text with Italian translation and notes.

159. (C) HOPPE, P. and KROLL, W.: C. Sallusti Crispi epistulae ad Caesarem senem de re publica. (Lat. Schultexte), Breslau 1929. First edition for schools, with notes.

160. (CT) WOYTE, C.: C. Sallustius Crispus, Briefe an Casar Uber den Staat. Deutsche Obersetzung m. Anm. u. Einleitung. Leipzig 1939. 161. (C) THEMANN, F.: Epistulae ad Caesarem senem de republica. Text und Kommentar. Leipzig 1940. 162. (C) ROMANO, D.: vide nr. 146. 1948.

163. (T) UTTSCHENKO, s. L.: C. Sallusti Crispi Epistolae ad Caesarem senem. Historiarum fragmenta. VOi 1950, p. 229-254. Translation into Russian, with notes and an introduction on the political conceptions of Sallust.

164. (ETC) PALADINI, V.: Sallustius, Epistulae ad Caesarem. Testo critico, traduzione e commento filologico. Roma 1952. R: Malcovati Ath 1953 p. 384-5. Prete Gn 1955 p. 515-8.

165. (C) KUZMA, M.: vide nr. 670. 1959.

166. (ETC) VRETSKA, K.: vide nr. 149. I, II. 1961.

15

167. (E) KURFESS, A.: Appendix Sallustiana I. Epistulae ad Caesarem senem de republica. Tbn. Leipzig 19211, 19302, 19503, 19554 , 1959 6, 19628 • R: vide nr. 148. With praefatio, bibliography, apparatus cnticus, parallel passages, index nominum, conspectus archaismorum, sententiarum, congruentiae Sallustianae.

168. (ETC) ERNOUT, A.: vide nr. 150. 1962. C. CATILINA AND IUGURTHA TOGETHER 1) 169. SPIRA, VINDELINUS DE: C. Sallustius Crispus, Opera. Venezia 1470. Editio Princeps.

170. PETRI, PHIL.: C. Sallustius Crispus, Opera. Venezia 1478. 171. PoMPONIUS LAETUS: C. Sallustius Crispus, Opera. Roma 1490. 172. VALLA, LOR. and SOLDI, J. CHR.: C. Sallustius Crispus e.a. Roma, before 1495. 173. AscENSIUS, J.B.: C. Sallustii Crispi Opera. Paris 1508, 1509. Venezia 1513, 1514. With important introduction; see Schindler (nr. 46) p. 3.

174. ALDUS et ASULANUS: C. Sallustius Crispus ... [ed. A. P. Manutius]. Venezia 1509. 175. (C) Vossms, G. J.: C. Sallustii Crispi opera quae exstant. .. Leiden 1591. 176. (C) HAVER CAMP, S.: C. Cris pi Sallustii quae exstant .... 2 vol. Amsterdam 1742. Contains the notae of the important previous editions.

177. (C) BURNOUF, J. L.: C. Sallustius Crispus ... cum ... commentariis. Paris (Didot) 1821. With indices.

178. (C) KRITZ, F.: C. Sallusti Crispi Catilina, lugurtha, Historiarum fragmenta. Leipzig 18531, 18562 • 179. {E) GERLACH, F. D.: C. Sallusti Crispi Catilinam lugurtham, Historiarum reliquias ed. Basel 1831, 1870. 180. (C) DIETSCH, R.: Gai Sallusti Crispi quae supersunt. 2 vol. Leipzig 18461, 18764 • R: Wolfflin, Ph 1861 p. 519-47. With index verborum. The appar. crit. is unreliable. 1)

With or without the other works.

Memosyne. Suppl. IV

3

16

EDITIONS, COMMANTARIES, TRANSLATIONS

181. (E) JoRDAN, H.: C. Sallusti Crispi Catilina, Jugurtha, Historiarum reliquiae potiores, incerti rhetoris suasoriae ad Caes. s. de re pub!. Accedunt incerti rhetoris invectivae Tullii et Sallustii personis tributae. Berlin 18661, 18762, 18873 (Krtiger). R: Eussner BJ 10 and JLZ 1876. Reinach RCr 1887 p. 262 sqq. Hauler ZOG 1887 p. 834-841. Most important critical edition of the XIX th century.

182. (E) C0NSTANS, L.: Salluste, conjuration de Catiline, guerre de Jugurtha, discours et lettres tirees des histoires, suivies de la lettre et du discours a Cesar. 18811, 18902 , 1893 3 • R: Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 218. Follows Jordan in recensio and text.

183. (E) SCHEINDLER, A.: C. Sallusti Crispi Catilina, bellum Jugurthinum, ex historiis quae exstant orationes et epistulae. Accedunt suasoriae et invectivae. Prag, Leipzig 1884. R: Prammer BPhW 1885 p. 497-500. Eussner WklPh 1885 p. 655-6. Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 213. Text with many differences from Jordan's. Indulges in conjectures.

184. (C) DELTOUR, F.: Salluste, opera. Edition classique accomp. de remarques et de notes grammaticales, philologiques et historiques. Paris 1896. 185. (C) SCHLEE, F.: C. Sallustius Crispus. Ftir d. Schulgebrauch bearb. und erlautert. Leipzig. I Text 1895 1 • II Komm. 18961 . R: Opitz WklPh 1896 p. 1284-7. Text similar to Jordan's; elementary commentary.

186. (E) EusSNER, A.: C. Sallusti Crispi Catilina, Jugurtha, ex historiis orationes et epistulae, in usum scholarum. Tbn. Leipzig 18871, 18973 • R: Scheindier DLZ 1888 p. 1637. Ramorino RFC 1889 p. 147-9. Maurenbrecher BJ IOI p. 210. Replaces Dietsch's ed. minor in the Biblioth. Teubn. Follows Jordan in his preference for P.

187. (ET) DUROSOJR, CH. et CHARPENTIER, J. P.: Oeuvres completes de Salluste, avec la traduction fran~aise et precedes d'une etude sur Salluste par Ch., Coll. Panckouke. Paris 1908. 188. (E) AHLBERG, A. W.: C. Sallustius Crispus, Catilina, lugurtha, orationes et epistulae excerptae de historiis. Ton., Leipzig 1919. R: Klotz BPhW 1919 p. 1204-10. Kurfess Sokr (ZG) 1920 p. 318-20, BJ 192 p. 55-6. Comp. also nrs. 203, 212, where the critical commentary is given in a fuller form. Ahlberg's text is based on the results of his Prolegomena (nr. 77). For an editio minor see nr. 191.

189. (ET) ROLFE, J.C.: Sallust, with an English translation. Loeb, London 1921. R: Butler CIR 1921 p. 79. Brotherton C!Ph 1926 p. 391.

EDITIONS, COMMANTARIES, TRANSLATIONS

17

190. {ET) ORNSTEIN, B. et ROMAN, J.: Conjuration de Catiline, Guerre de Jugurtha, texte etabli par 0., traduit par R. Bude, Paris 1924. R: Faider BMB 30 p. 132.

191. (E) AHLBERG, A. W.: C. Sallusti Crispi. Catilina, Iugurtha, orationes et epistulae excerptae de Historiis. Tbn. ed. minor, Leipzig 1932. Shows some important textual divergences from nr. 188.

192. {ET) RICHARD, F.: Salluste. La conjuration de Catilina, la guerre de Jugurtha et fragments des Histoires; traduction nouvelle avec des notes. Garnier, Paris 19331, 19362 • R: Marouzeau REL 1933 p. 494. Juret BFS 1933 p. 45. Prechac RU 1937, 433-4.

193. {T) WEINSTOCK, H.: Das Jahrhundert der Revolution. Kroners T.A. Leipzig 1939. R: Woltertorff PhW 1940p. 151. Compare nr. 320.

194. (ET) ERNOUT, A.: Salluste, la conjuration de Catilina, la guerre de Jugurtha, fragments des Histoires. Texte etabli et traduit. Bude, Paris 194!1, 1946 2, 19583 • R: v. Ooteghem ECl 1942 p. 262. Marouzeau REL 1942 p. 190-1. Bayet RPh 1943 p. 222-4. Boyance REA 1944 p. 189-191. Josserand ACl 1946 p. 151-3. Thomas RPh 1948 p. 210. Btichner (nr. 37) p. 83 n. 6.

195. (E) HAAS, H.: C. Sallustius Crispus. Catilinae Coniuratio, Bellum lugurthinum, Epist. ad Caes. Eingeleitet von M. Gelzer. Heidelberg 194?1, 19594 • 196. (E) KuRFESS, A.: C. Sallustius Crispus. Catilina, Iugurtha, Historiarum fragmenta ampliora. Tbn. Leipzig, post A. W. Ahlberg 19511, 19542 , 19573 • R: Malcovati Ath 1955 p. 371-3. Marouzeau REL 1955 p. 441. Ernout RPh

1956 p. 140. Pepe GIF 1956 p. 78. Leeman Mn 1956 p. 274-6. Josserand RBPh 1956 p. 912. Pab6n Em 1958 p. 137.

197. (ET) SCHOENE, W. - EISENHUT, W.: Sallustius, Werke. Tusculum Milnchen 1950, 19602 • R: Plankl Gy 1952 p. 269-70. Malcovati Ath 1954 p. 278. Vretska AAHG 1961 p. 193.

D. CATILINA 198. (C) BENIUS EUGUBINUS, P.: In Sallustii Catilinam commentarius. Venezia 1622. Huge commentary, remarkable in that it discovers political partiality everywhere (comp. Schindler nr. 46 p. 14).

199. {C) THOMAS, P.: De Bello Catilinae liber. Texte revu et annote. Mons 18902 • R: Uri RCr 1890 p. 281-3. Comp. nr. 219.

18

EDITIONS, COMMANTARIES, TRANSLATIONS

200. (CT) CROISET, M.: Catilina, par Salluste, explique litteralement, traduit et annote. Paris 1883 1 , 1898 5 • Comp. nr. 220.

201. (C) SUMMERS, W. C.: C. Sallusti Crispi Catilina. Cambridge 19001, 19252 • R: Maurenbrecher BPhW 1902 p. 682. Thompson CIR 1903 p. 263. Bornecque RPh 1901 p. 280.

202. (C) YANNUCCI, A. and AMATUCCI, A. G.: C. Sallustius Crispus. Coniuratio Catilinae. Prato 190714 • Comp. nr. 222.

203. (E) AHLBERG, A. W. : C. Sallusti Crispi Coniuratio Catilinae. Goteborg and Leipzig 1911. R: vide nr. 224. Compare nr. 188.

204. (C) ANTOINE, F. and LALLIER, R.: C. Sallusti Crispi opera. Oeuvres de S. Texte latin, publie d'apres les travaux les plus recents, avec un commentaire critique et explicatif et une introduction. II Conjuration de Catilina, Paris 18881, 191211 • For many years the leading French edition.

205. (C) OPITZ, TH.: C. Sallusti Crispi Bellum Catilinae, Bellum lugurthinum, orationes et epistulae ex historiis excerptae, fi.ir den Schulgebrauch erklart. I Die Catilinarische Verschworung. Leipzig 18941, 19184 •

R: Hauler BPhW 1896 p. 1386-9. Maurenbrecher BJ IOI p. 214. Scheindler ZOG 1898 p. 214-6. Golling Gy 1898 p. 338. The text is mainly Jordan's; the commentary is useful. Comp. nrs. 225, 243

206. (C) SCHMALZ, J. H.: Sallust, fi.ir den Schulgebrauch herausgegeben. I. Bellum Catilinae. Gotha 18821 , 191910 • R: Maurenbrecher BJ IOI p. 214. Kurfess ZG 1920 p. 318. With excellent remarks on language and style. Comp. nr. 226.

207. (C) RAMORINO, F.: La Catilinaria e la Giugurthina di C. Sallustio Crispo, illustrate. I Introduzione generale. La congiura di Catilina. Torino 18851, 19203 • Good edition.

208. (C) JACOBS, R., WIRZ, H. and KURFESS, A.: C. Sallusti Crispi De Coniuratione Catilinae liber. Orationes et epistulae ex Historiis excerptae. Berlin 18521 , 18772 (Wirz), 192211 (Kurfess). R: 5th ed.: Eussner JPh 103 p. 401-419. 7th-10th ed.: Maurenbrecher BJ IOI p. 208 sq. 10th ed.: Schmalz BPhW 1894 p. 1421. Still the best commentary in existence. Comp. nr. 227.

209. (C) PARETI, L.: La guerra di Catilina, con note. Firenze 1935. R: Vegezzi BFC 1935-6 p. 128-38. Good edition.

EDITIONS, COMMANTARIES, TRANSLATIONS

19

210. (C) BoLAFFI, E.: C. Sallustio Crispo. La congiura di Catilina, con note. Firenze 1938.

211. (C) DELACROIX, P.: Salluste, Catilina, edition avec commentaire grammaticale. Paris 1938. R: Marouzeau REL 1938 p. 450.

212. (C) JossERAND, CH.: Salluste. La conjuration de Catilina. Bruxelles 1942, 19512. R: Lienard ACI 1943 p. 30. Janmart RBPh 1944 p. 612. Delande ECI 1943

p. 228. Marouzeau REL 1942 p. 193. Scalais LEC 1951 p. 455.

With extensive commentary.

213. (C) MALCOVATI, E.: Sallustius, De Catilinae Coniuratione. Torino

1945 2, 19563 •

R: Rambaud REL 1956 p. 370-1. Bolaffi L 1958 p. 116-22.

214. (C) STEIDLE, W.: Sallust, Die Verschworung des Catilina, mit Nachwort, sprachl. und Sachl. Erlauterungen, Worterverzeichnis und Verzeichnis der Eigennamen. Milnchen 1949. R: Schmid MH 1954 p. 252.

215. (C) PASTORINO, A.: Sallustio, La congiura di Catilina. Testo, introduzione e commento, Genova 1951. 216. (T) TIMMERMANS, G.: Sallustius, De Samenzwering van Catilina. Antwerpen 1953 4• R: Lurquin 1954 p. 887.

217. (ET) PAB6N, J.M.: Sallustio, I Catilina. Barcelona 1954. R: MarouzeauREL 1954p. 420. MalcovatiAth 1955 p. 369-71. Bardon L 1955 p. 123. Malcolm CIR 1956 p. 41-2. Emout RPh 1956 p. 126. Leeman Mn 1956 p. 276. Eisenhut Gn 1959 p. 458-60.

218. (C) HARMS, B.: C. Sallustius Crispus. Catilinae Coniuratio. Lehrerkommentar. Frankfurt a. M., Berlin, Bonn 1962. R: Vretska Gy 1963 p. 57. Van Weddingen L 1963 p. 638. Leeman Mn 1964 p. 423-5. E. JUGURTHA

219. (C) THOMAS, P.: De Bello Jugurthino liber. Texte revu et annote. Mons 18862 R: Gantrelle RIPB 1887 p. 33-5. Eussner BPhW 1887 p. 750-2. Comp. nr. 199.

220. (CT) CROISET, M. : Jugurtha, par Salluste, explique litteralement, traduit et annote. Paris 18841, 18963• Comp. nr. 200.

221. {C) SUMMERS, W. C.: C. Sallusti Crispi lugurtha. Cambridge 1902. R: Thompson QR 1903 p. 263.

20

EDITIONS, COMMANTAIRES, TRANSLATIONS

222. (C) VANNUCCI, A. and BIANCHI, E.: C. Sallustius Crispus, Bellum Jugurthinum. Prato 1908 13 • Comp. nr. 202.

223. (E) CANTER, H. V.: Sallust. The Jugurthine War. New York 1912. 224. (E) AHLBERG, A. W. : C. Sallusti Crispi Bellum lugurthinum. Goteborg-Leipzig 1915. R: Klotz BPhW 1916 p. 39 sqq. Kurfess JPhVB 1916 p. 203-8. Weyman LZB 1916 p. 1319 sqq.(!) 1 ) Beck MPh 1916 p. 167. Helm DLZ 1917 p. 1510. Lejay RPh 1917 p. 156. Important critical edition, with testimonia veterum. Comp. nrs. 77, 203, 188

225. (C) OPITZ, TH.: vide nr. 205. II. Der Jugurthinische Krieg. Leipzig 1895 1, 19184 • 226. (C) SCHMALZ, J. H.: vide nr. 206. II. Bellum lugurthinum. Gotha 18831, 192010 • 227. (C) JACOBS, R., WIRZ, H.: C. Sallusti Crispi De Bello lugurthino liber. Berlin 192211. Comp. nr. 208. Edited byKurfessfrom the manuscript ofWirz, who died in 1914•

228. (C) CESAREO, E.: La guerra Giugurtina, con comm. Firenze 1931. R: Klotz PhW 1933 p. 1311-14. Good edition with extensive notes and introduction. Useful for the many remarks on Sallust's language.

229. (C) MALCOVATI, E.: Sallustius, Bellum lugurthinum. Torino 1947 2, 19563 • R: Rambaud REL 1956 p. 370-1. Bolaffi L 1958 p. 116-22.

230. (C) LEEMAN, A. D.: C. Sallustius Crispus. Bellum lugurthinum. Leiden 19503, 19644 • R: Charles L 1951 p. 129.

231. (ET) PAB6N, J.M.: Sallustio, II Bellum lugurthinum. Barcelona 1956. R: Leeman Mn 1958 p. 279. Malcovati Ath 1958 p. 172-5. Emout RPh 1958 p. 348. Bardon REA 1958 p. 232. Eisenhut Gn 1959 p. 458-60. Malcolm CIR 1961 p. 84.

232. (C) RAMORINO, F.: Sallustio, La guerra di Giugurta. Torino 1956.

I. All fragments.

F.

HISTORIAE

233. CARRIO, L.: C. Sallustius Crispus, Historiarum libri VI, collecti et restituti. Antwerpen 1573-4. First collector of the fragments; he makes no attempt to arrange them in the correct order. 1)

In Analecta sacra et profana N. F. (Festgabe Ehrhart 1922), 2, p. 47 sqq. Weyman

gives additional testimonia.

EDITIONS, COMMANTARIES, TRANSLATIONS

21

234. Vossms, G. J.: vide nr. 175. 1591. 235. CORTIUS, G.: Sallusti opera recensuit et notis illustravit. Leipzig 1724. First editor to bring the fragments in a more or less chronological order. He has been closely followed in the editions of Paschalius (1737), Havercamp (1742) (vide nr. 176), Foulis (1749, 1777 2) and others.

236. BRossES, CH. DE: Histoire de la republique romaine dans le cours du VIie siecle, par Salluste. Dijon 1777 1). Curious attempt at a reconstruction of the whole work of Sallust by incorporating the fragments (in a French translation) in a full history of the time.

237. (C) KRITZ, F.: vide nr. 178. 18562 • 238. (E) GERLACH, F. D.: vide nr. 179. 1870. 239. (C) DIETSCH, R.: vide nr. 180. 18764•

240. (C) MAURENBRECHER, B.: C. Sallusti Crispi Historiarum reliquiae,

fasc. I. Prolegomena. Leipzig 1891. Fasc. II. Fragmenta argumentis commentariis apparatu critico instructa. Accedunt indices. Leipzig 1893. R: Hiiter JGW 1891 p. 116. Tilley EHR 1892 p. 337. Scheindler DLZ 1892 p. 434-5. Opitz WklPh 1894p. 673 sqq. Lejay RCr 1894p. 430. SchmalzBPhW 1894 p. 492-5. Schlee ZG 1895 p. 97-8. Hauler ZOG 1894 p. 747-760 (!). Landgraf BBG 1895 p. 133 sqq. (!) See also Maurenbrecher's own comments in BJ 113 (1902) p. 232-8. Excellent edition, based on a penetrating study of the source problems.

2. Orationes et Epistulae. 241. (E) JORDAN, H.: vide nr. 181. 18873 • 242. (C) FIGHIERA, L. S.: Sallustius, le orazioni e le epistole contenute nelle storie, illustrata. Savona 1897. 243. (C) OPITZ, TH.: vide nr. 205: III. Die Reden und Briefe aus den Historien. Leipzig 1897. 244. (E) AHLBERG, A.

w.: vide nr.

188. 1919.

For the critical foundations of this part of the edition see the author's Prolegomena (nr. 77) p. 68-86.

245. (C) JACOBS, R., WIRZ, H. and KURFESS, A.: vide nr. 208. 192211 • R: Maurenbrecher BJ 113 p. 239.

246. (E) AHLBERG, A. W.: vide nr. 191. 1932. 247. (Cn RICHARD, F.: vide nr. 192. 19362• 248. (Cn ERNOUT, A.: vide nr. 194. 19462 • 1)

German translation by Schilter (1810-'21).

22

EDITIONS, COMMANTARIES, TRANSLATIONS

249. (ECT) PALADINI, V.: Sallustius, Orationes et Epistulae de Historiarum libris excerptae, testo, traduzione e commento. Bari 1956. R: Bardon REL 1957 p. 366-7. Emout RPh 1958 p. 166. Malcovati Ath 1958 p. 171-2. Leeman Mn 1958 p. 80. Vretska Gn 1958 p. 192-4. Pab6n Em 1958 p. 138-40. Malcolm CIR 1961 p. 84.

3. Palimpsest fragments. 250. HAULER, E.: Die Orleaner Palimpsestfragmente zu Sallusts Historien. WSt 9 (1887) p. 25-50 1). R: ALL 1887 p. 166. Cook CIR 1888 p. 25-6. All fragments of the palimpsest in the Orleans library, earlier published in parts (vide nrs. 879-881), are edited here together.

251. KROGER, P.: vide nr. 181. 18873 •

In his posthumous edition of Jordan's text, Kruger gives Hauler's fragments with slight alterations.

252. MAURENBRECHER, B.: vide nr. 240. 1893.

II 42, 43, 45, 47, 52, 87, 92, 93; III 5, 6, 96, 98.

1)

Also published separately (Wien 1888).

IV. SALLUST A. LIFE OF SALLUST 253. VOGEL, M.: De C. Sallusti Crispi vita, moribus ac scriptis. Pr. Mainz 1857. 254. JAEGER, M. : De vita C. Sallusti Crispi commentatio. Pr. Salzburg 1879 1). R: Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 166 sqq. All ancient sources quoted.

255. SELLGE, J.: vide nr. 1205. 1882. Collects the iudicia veterum.

256. FUNAIOLI, G.: vide nr. 293, p. 1913-20: Leben, offentliche Laufbahn 1920. 257. KURFESS, A.: vide nr. 208: Einleitung. 1922. Introduction with references to the ancient sources.

258. LAGUERRE, G.: Salluste, biographie par les textes. Hum 1939, p. 276-283, p. 330-336. 259. ERNOUT, A.: vide nr. 194: Introduction. 19462 • 260. ZIMMERMANN, A.: Etymologische Versuche 1. Augur, Rustius, Sallustius. ALL 7 (1892), p. 435-6. 261. HIRSCHFELD, 0.: Dellius ou Sallustius. Melanges Boissier (1913), p. 293-6. R: Kurfess BJ 183 p. 127. The date of Sallust's death: May 13th, 35 B.C. (not 39 B.C.). Compare nr. 262.

262. HELM, R.: Hieronymus' Zusatze in Eusebius Chronik und ihr Wert fiir die Literaturgeschichte. Ph Suppl. 21, 2 (1929), p. 39. R: Kurfess BJ 269 p. 3-4. The dates of Sallust's birth and death. Compare nr. 261.

263. BROUGHTON, T. R. S.: More notes on Roman magistrates. TAPhA 79 (1948), p. 63-78. Cassius Dio on the pretorship of Sallust. 1) Also published together with nr. 277; title: De C. Sallusti Crispi vita, moribus et scriptis, Salzburg 1884.

24

SALLUST

264. ALLEN, W.: Sallust's political carreer. Summary TAPhA 80 (1949), p. 425. Full text Stud. in Philo!. 51 (1954), I. Sallust a partisan of Mark Antony.

265. LA PENNA, A. : Sallustio Antoniano? SIFC 33 (1961 ), p. 258. Fr. Hist. 3,3 M. seems to show that S. was not a partisan of Mark Antony (cf. nr. 264).

265 A. KuRFESS, A.: vide nr. 196. Praefatio, Testimonia veterum. 19573 • 265B. BENARIO, H. W.: The End of Sallustius Crispus. Cl J 57 (1962), p. 321-3. 265C. SYME, R.: vide nr. 383. Ch. 1-V. 1964. 8. SALLUST: HIS PERSONALITY; HISTORIAN OR POLITICIAN? 1) 266. SCHINDLER, F.: vide nr. 46. 1939. The conception, praise and depreciation of Sallust's personality from the Renaissance onward.

267. SCALIGER, J. C.: Poetices libri VII. 15611, p. 144, 1586 2 , p. 366. R: Schindler (nr. 46) p. 1. Sallust is described as an objective and sincere historian.

268. BENIUS EUGUBINUS, P.: vide nr. 198. 1622. R: Schindler (nr. 46) p. 14. In this highly polemical commentary Sallust is seen as a falsifier of history for the sake of his master Caesar and the democrats: Beni is an interesting forerunner of Mommsen and Schwartz.

269. Vossrns, G. J.: De historicis latinis libri III. Leiden 162?1, 16512. R: Schindler (nr. 46) p. 24 sq. The statement here that Sallust has to be regarded as a sincere historian settled the controversy until the middle of the 19th century.

270. BROSSES, CH. DE: vide nr. 236. 1777. R: Schindler (nr. 46) p. 35. In the famous introduction Sallust is highly praised as a historian.

271. GERLACH, F. 0.: vide nr. 179. 1831. R: Schindler (nr. 46) p. 54. Tries to gather information on Sallust's character from his works.

272. MOMMSEN, TH.: Romische Geschichte III (1856), [p. 195 Anm. 18756]. R: Schindler (nr. 46) p. 68. Mommsen's casual suggestion that the peculiarities of Sallust's historiography ought to be explained by his tendency to clear the populares and Caesar again roused the controversy, seemingly settled centuries ago. 1) Compare the sections 'Sallustbild' in BJ 252 (p. 65-83) and 269 (p. 62-9); vide nrs. 21 and 22.

SALLUST

25

273. DIETSCH, R.: Ober die richtige Auffassung und Wiirdigung des Sallust. Verhandl. 16. Philol. Vers. Stuttgart 1~57. In the speech printed here, Dietsch declared for Mommsen's suggestion (nr. 272). In the debate after the lecture, Gerlach maintained the impartiality of Sallust.

274. NISARD, D.: Les quatre grands historiens latins. Paris 1874, 18862 (p. 141-197 :S.). 275. NISARD, A. : L'historien Salluste et les dernieres convulsions de la republique romaine. IP 7 (1878) Paris, p. 783-6, 798-9, 815-8. 276. GOEPEL, G.: vide nr. 725. 1878. 277. JAEGER, M.: De C. Sallusti Crispi moribus et scriptis. Pr. Salzburg 1884 1). 278. RAMBEAU, TH.: Charakteristik der historischen Darstellung des Sallust. Pr. Burg I 1879, II 1892. R: MaurenbrecherBJ 101 p.173.

279. LANZA, C.: Sallustius. Dissertatio. Pr. Genua 1881. 280. QUARANTA, C.: Difesa di C. Crispo Sallustio. Studio critico. Perugia 1889. 281. CoLINI-BALDESCHI, L.: Questioni Sallustiane. Ballet. d. societa di storia patria Anton Ludov. Antinori negli Abruzzi 4 (l 892) p. 210-28. I Dove debba ubicarsi Amiterno patria di Sallustio, II Che vi sia di vero e che di falso nelle accuse lanciate contro S. como uome e como cittadino.

282. BELLEZZA, P.: Dei fonti e dell' autorita storica di C. Crispo Sallustio" Diss. Milano 1891. R: Ramorino RF 20 p. 35 I. Schlee JPh VB I 895 p. 98 sqq. Sallust's works are free from political tendency.

283. GERSTENBERG, C.: 1st Sallust ein Parteischriftsteller? Pr. Berlin 1893. R: Schulten DLZ 1894 p. 298-302. Opitz JklPh 1895 p. 1198 sqq. Schlee JPhVB 1895 p. 102-4. Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 177. The answer is given in a positive sense.

284. SCHWARTZ, E.: Vide nr. 694. 1897. This analysis of the sources of the Coni. Cat. seemed to confirm Mommsen's thesis (nr. 272) and helped it to gain undisputed victory for thirty years, particularly in Germany.

285. PALA TINI, L. : Veracita storica delle opere certe di C. Sallustio Crispo. Ballet. etc. (vide nr. 281) 11 (1899). 286. CASTI, E. : Debole fundamento delle accuse lanciate contro Sallustio come uome e come cittadino. Bollet. etc. (vide nr. 281) 11 (1899). 1)

Also published together with nr. 254.

26

SALLUST

287. BANZ, R.: vide nr. 728. 1904. Ardent follower of Schwartz (nr. 284).

288. LAUCKNER, C.: vide nr. 782. 1911. Applies Schwartz's methods to the Jugurtha, and comes to the same conclusions.

289. VoLPIS, L.: Sallustio, storico partigiano. Pr. Pola 1911. 290. CIPOLLA, A. : C. Sallustio Crispo e lo scandalo attributogli da M. Terenzio Varrone nel frammento del logistorico Pius aut de pace. Cremona 1915. R: Tentori RF 1915 p. 511.

291. DAHLMANN, H. (- HEISTERHAGEN), Varronische Studien I. Zu den Logistorici. Akad. Wissensch. u. d. Lit. Mainz, Wiesbaden, Abh. 4 (1957), p. 159-69 (III Zurn Pius de pace). 292. ALHEIT, L.: Charakterdarstellung bei Sallust. NJ 43 (1919), p. 17-54. The character-drawing in Sallust's works serves their political aim: to defend Caesar and the democrats.

293. FUNAIOLI, G.: C. Sallustius Crispus. PW 2. R. 12 p. 1913-55 (1920). R: Galdi RIGI 2 p. 177-80.

Leben, i:iffentliche Laufbahn, Schriften (Cat., Jug., Hist., Umstrittene Sallustiana, schriftstellerischer Charakter (polit., eth., kiinstler.; Sprache), Fortleben. Excellent and fundamental article; reserved attitude towards Mommsen's thesis then prevailing.

294. RIPARI, R.: Sallustio difeso come uomo e cittadino. Macerata 1920. 295. GEBHARDT, 0.: vide nr. 619. 1920. First in Germany to raise his voice against the thesis of Mommsen-Schwartz.

296. TOLKIEHN, J.: Vide nr. 729. 1925. Against Schwartz: in the Coni. Cat. no injustice is done to the rc'.'>le of Cicero.

297. LEVI, M.A.: Sallustio e la vita publica romana del suo tempo. Torino 1926. 298. BAEHRENS, W. A.: Sallust als Historiker, Politiker und Tendenzschriftsteller. NWzA, I. R., H. 4 (Leipzig 19271, 19292), p. 35-82 1). R: Ensslin MHL 1929 p. 228. Emout RCr 1928 p. 299. Kurfess BJ 252 p. 3, 9, 67. Attacks several points of the thesis of Mommsen-Schwartz.

299. DREXLER, H.: Sallust. VDPh 56 (1927), p. 48-9. Sallust was a sincere historian, whose moral and political ideals are derived from early Rome.

300. DREXLER, H.: Sallust. NJ 4 (1928), p. 390-9.

R: Kurfess BJ 252 p. 69. Sallust's works reveal a sincere anxiety for the republic.

1)

Originally a lecture delivered in Gi:ittingen, 1926.

SALLUST

27

301. KLINGNER, F.: vide nr. 868. 1928. Sallust's conception of history.

302. LANZANI, C.: Sallustio. Milano 1929. 303. SEEL, 0.: Sallust von den Briefen ad Caesarem zur Coniuratio CatiIinae. Leipzig 1930. R: Drexler DLZ 1931 p. 1796 sqq. Cary CIR 1931 p. 90. Klotz PhW 1931 p. 1379 sqq. Constans REL 1930 p. 389. Funaioli BFC 1930 p. 129 sqq. Kroll Gn 1932 p. 320 sqq. Bayet RPh 1933 p. 223. Toutain RH 1935 p. 180. Thomasz EPhK 1937 p. 128 sqq. I Einleitung, II Die Briefe, III Die Coni. Catilinae, IV Oberblick und Abschluss, Anhang: Die Briefe Sallusts im Altertum. Sallust's spiritual development in his earlier works.

304. SKARD, E.: Sallust als Politiker. SO 9 (1930), p. 69-95. R: Kurfess BJ 252 p. 41. Schur (nr. 401) p. 76-80. Deals mainly with the Epistulae ad Caes.; Sallust grows more and more independent of Caesar and his monarchist ideals.

305. BOLAFFI, E.: II pensiero e I'arte di Sallustio. RIGI 1931, p. 1-41. Though sympathising with the democrats, Sallust did not write his works for political reasons.

306. SPREY, K.: De C. Sallustio Crispo homine populari. Mn 59 (1932), p. 103-131. 307. CESAREO, E. : Sallustio. Firenze 1932. R: Last CIR 1932 p. 141. Klotz PhW 1933 p. 1311-14. Bolaffi BFC 1933 p. 230-3; idem: Esame critico de! Sallustio di E. Ces. (Pesaro 1933). Calonghi AR 1934 p. 208. Zeppa de Nolva Em 1934 p. 155. Taccone MCI 1935 p. 55.

308. £GERMANN, F.: vide nr. 400: p. 85-7: Das Sallustbild. 1932. 309. SANCTIS, G. DE: vide nr. 787. 1932. Sticks to the conception of a political tendency in Sallust's works. Comp. nr. 312.

310. HERCHENBACH, F.: Sallust als Politiker. Festgabe Meyer, Mlinstereifel 1933, p. 22-25. 311. SCHUR, W.: Sallust als Historiker. Stuttgart 1934. R: Kurfess PhW 1935 p. 417-25. Funaioli BFC 1935 p. 10-16 Cary CIR 1935 p. 30. Canter CIPh 1935 p. 87-8. Derouaux ECI 1935 p. 470. Glaser Kl 1935 p. 340. Sanchez Barrado Em 1936 p. 352-60. Haywood AJPh 1937 p. 381. Egermann _Gn 1937 p. 240-7. Thomasz EPhK 1938 p. 121-7. Vretska OHS 1936 p. 16 sq. Kurfess BJ 252 p. 5, 9, 13, 42, 78. Comp. Schur nr. 401. I. Sallust als politischer Schriftsteller im Biirgerkriege (Epp. ad C.). II. Sallusts Geschichtsbild in seiner Entwicklung (Stoic influences). III. Sallusts Monographie iib. d. jugurthinischen Krieg (analysis, tendency). IV. Sallusts Monographie iib. d. catilin. Verschw. (compos., Cicero, Caesar, Cato, tendency). V. Sallusts Historien (composition, Sertorius, Pompey). The evolution of Sallust from politician to historian under the influence mainly of Posidonius.

SALLUST

28

312. LANZANI, C.: Bimillenaria fama usurpata. Hist. 8 (1934), p. 79-89. R: Kurfess PhW 1935 p. 719-20. Against de Sanctis (nr. 309).

313. 0PPERMANN, H. :Sallust. Ein Vortrag. HG 1935, p. 29-34 1). Comp. nr. 314.

314. OPPERMANN, H.: Das heutige SaJlustbild. NJ 11 (1935), p. 47-53. Sallust is a scholar pure and simple without any contact with the real political problems of his time.

315. LATTE, K.: Sallust. NWzA, 2. R, H. 4. Leipzig 1935. R: Kroll HZ 1935 p. 175. Hari EPkK 1935 p. 428-30. Riidiger GArb 1935. McDonald CIR 1935 p. 231. Amatucci BFC 1935 p. 348. v. OoteghemECI 1935 p. 676. Marouzeau REL 1935 p. 395. Klotz PhW 1936 p. 293-7. DahlmannGn 1936 p. 255-60. Vretska OHS 1936 p. 17 and Gy. 1937 p. 65 sqq. Canter C!Ph 1937 p. 185 sqq. Kurfess BJ 252 p. 31, 81. I. Ausdruck und Satzform. II. Erziihlungsstil und Komposition. III Persl:>nlichkeit und Zeit. Sallust is neither a politician nor a historian, but an artist.

316. PEREMANS,

w.: vide nr. 31. 1934-1936.

The change in the conception of Sallust as a historian in the years 1929-1935.

317. BoLAFFI, E.: La posizione di Sallustio rispetto a Cesare e i problemi critici conseguenti. Pesaro 1937. R: Corradi BFC 1937 p. 136-40. Gervasoni MCI 1937 p. 342.

318. SEEL, 0.: Romische Denker und romischer Staat. NWzA, I. R, H. 13. Leipzig 1937. R: Hohl PhW 1938 p. 1155-61. Oltramare REL 1938 p. 458-61. Sherman CIW 1938 p. 231. Peremans AC! 1938 p. 440. Sprey TG 1939 p. 76-8. Dahlmann Kl 1939 p. 228-31. Hari EPhK 1939 p. 223-7. Oppermann NJ 1938 p. 61.

319. RONNET: Doctrine et attitude politiques de Salluste dans le Catilina et le Jugurtha. MES Paris. R: REL 1937 p. 345.

320. WEINSTOCK, H.: Vide nr. 193: Einleitung. 1939. Analyses Sallust's psyche from a modern point of view.

321. PoscHL, V.: vide nr. 361, p. 8: Zwiespaltigkeit im Wesen Sallusts 1940. Results similar to Weinstock's (nr. 320).

322. CALEVO, J.: II problema della tendenziosita di Sallustio. Udine 1940. 323. FRITZ, K. VON: vide nr. 792. 1943. Sallust is falsifying history for political reasons.

324. PERROCHAT, P.: vide nr. 791; p. 204-5, p. 207: L'interet politique. 1943. 1)

A summary of this lecture had been published in Forsch. u. Fortschr., (1934) p. 415-6.

SALLUST

29

325. EBELING, R.: Sallust als Beurteiler seiner Zeit. Ant. As. 1944, p. 19-28. Sallust's works contain many allusions to his own time.

326. HOWALD, E.: Vom Geist antiker Geschichtsschreibung. Sieben Monographien. Miinchen 1944. R: Biichner (nr. 37) p. 88-9. One monograph deals with Sallust as an artist.

327. KELLER, E.: Sallust als Historiker und Politiker. Diss. Erlangen 1944 [not printed]. 328. FUNAIOLI, G.: vide nr. 34. 1948. 329. JENNY, J.: La politique et l'esprit de parti chez Salluste. MES Paris. R: REL 1946 p. 315.

330. LAMMLI, F.: vide nr. 750. 1946. 331. LAISTNER, M. L. W.: The Greater Roman Historians, III, Sallust. Univ. of Calif. 1947. 332. PALADINI, V.: Sallustio, aspetti della figura, del pensiero, dell'arte. Milano-Messina 1948. R: Carlotti: Come si scrive un libro su Sallustio, Roma 1949 (libel accusing

P. of plagiary). Delande LEC 1949 p. 426. Perrochat REL 1949 p. 366-70. Bignone Doxa 1948 p. 264-70. Malcovati Ath. 1948 p. 268-71. Preaux L 1951 p. 356. Paratore nr. 36. Cap. I Moralita, politica e storia in S. Cap. II S. e Tucidide. Cap. III S. e la storiografia ellenistica. Cap. IV S. pessimista?

333. BOLAFFI, E.: Sallustio e la sua fortuna nei secoli. Roma 1949. R: Malcovati Ath. 1949 p. 167-9. Scalais AC 1950 p. 209. Ernout RPh 1951

p. 13 I. Preaux L 1951 p. 504.

334. LAST, H.: vide nr. 737. 1948. 335. OLIVIERI SANGIACOMO, L.: vide nr. 374. 1954. 336. BUCHNER, K.: vide nr. 381. 1960. 337. EARL, D. C.: The Political Thought of Sallust. Cambridge 1961.

Political theory (prologues); virtus; moral crisis; lugurtha; Catilina; Historiae; conclusion. R: Nicolet REL 1961 p. 251-2. Badian Gn 1962 p. 463-6. Brunt Cl R 1962 p. 74-5. Smith Phoenix 1963 p. 69-70. Pab6n Em 1963 p. 171-3. Parke Hermathena 1963 p. 119. Vretska Gy 1963 p. 88. Hands JRS 1962 p. 274-5. Rutledge CU 1962 p. 135-8.

338. BUCHNER, K.: Das verum in der historischen Darstellung des Sallust. Gy 70 (1963), p. 231-52. Against the revival of the 'Tendenzhypothese' by von Fritz (cf. nr. 792). Analysis of the account of Jugurtha's deditio (Jug. 20-40).

30

SALLUST

338A. BUCHNER, K. : Le jugement historique de Salluste. BFS 41 (1962-3), p. 303-10. Cf. nr. 338. Summary REL 1962 p. 79-82.

338B. LA PENNA, A.: Le Historiae di Sallustio e l'interpretazione della crisi repubblicana. Ath 41 (1963), p. 201-74. The Historiae show the same tendency as the monographs, anti-nobility and anti-revolutionary. S.'s view is even more pessimistic here.

C. SALLUST: THE HISTORIAN AND THE THINKER

I. Sallust's Conception of Man and History (general works on Sallust) 339. SCHINDLER, F.: vide nr. 46, p. 95 Exkurs 8: Wern verdankt Sallust seine Geschichtsauffassung? Short history of the problem.

340. WENDLING, E.: Zu Poseidonios und Varro. H 28 (1893), p. 345. R: Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 176. The idea in Cat. 51, 37 (adoption of foreign customs by the Romans) derives from Posidonius.

341. WACHSMUTH, C.: Einleitung in das Studium der alten Geschichte; p. 657-62: Sallustius. Leipzig 1895. The prologues and the digressions derive from Posidonius.

342.

PAJK,

J.: Sallust als Ethiker. Pr. Wien, I 1892, II 1894, III 1895.

R: Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 169 sq. Schlee JPhVB 1895 p. 104-6. I: 1. Die menschliche Natur, 2. Personlichkeit u. freie Wille, 3. Einfluss der Umstande, 4. Hochstes Ziel, 5. Gut u. Bose. II. 6. Religiose u. polit. Ansichten, 7. Kritik der sallustischen Ethik. III. 8. Philosophenschule (Stoa), 9. Ethische Quellen (Thuc., Plato), 10 S. u. Cicero (de rep.).

343. COSTA, G.: Fabio Pittore e Sallustio RSA 13 (1909) p. 30-41. From F. B. Sallust derives information on Corsica.

344. THEISSEN, W. : De Sallustii Livii Taciti digressionibus. Diss. Berlin 1912. R: Klotz BPhW 1913 p. 142 sqq. Kurfess BJ 183 p. 132. Posidonius is the source of the digressions in Sallust's works.

345. NORDEN, E.: Die germanische Urgeschichte in Tacitus' Germania, p. 145 Anm. 2. Leipzig-Berlin 1920. Posidonius is used in the prologues, but not in the digressions.

246. KESELING, P.: Sallust Bellum Catilinae 9, I und Tacitus Germania 19. PhW 48 (1928), p. 1085-7. The similarity of these passages(concordia)may point to a common(Stoic) origin.

347. ENGELHARD, A.: Tacitea. Diss. Freiburg i. B. 1928. Comparison between Cat. 6-14 and Tac. Ann. III 26-28.

SALLUST

31

348. KLINGNER, F.: vide nr. 868. 1928. Influence of Posidonius on the evolution of Sallust's conception of history.

349. TAEGER, F.: Tiberius Gracchus. Unters. z. rom. Gesch. u. Quellenkunde, p. 47-57: Sallust und Posidonius. Stuttgart 1928. R: Stein Ph W 1929 p. 508. Schur (nr. 311) p. 61 sqq. Kurfess BJ 252 p. 68.

350. GELZER, M. : Nasicas Widerspruch gegen die Zerstorung Karthagos. Ph 86 (1931), p. 261 sqq. 1). No direct connection between Sallust's digressions and the ideas of Posidonius can be ascertained.

351. WEGEHAUPT, H.: Die Bedeutung und Anwendung von dignitas in den Schriften der republikanischen Zeit; p. 69-75: Dignitas in den Schriften Sallusts. Diss. Breslau 1932. 352. SCHUR, W.: vide nr. 311, II: Sallusts Geschichtsbild in seiner Entwicklung (p. 61-103). 1934. R: Kurfess BJ 252 p. 68-9. Stoische Historiker (Polybius, Panaetius, Posidonius), Abschnitte des Catiline, Jugurtha, Einleitung der Historien, Sallust und Poseidonios. Stresses Sallust's growing pessimism.

353. SCHORNER, G.: Sallust und Horaz iiber den Sittenverfall und die sittliche Erneuerung Roms. Diss. Erlangen 1934. R: Kroll DLZ 1935 p. 1684. Dahlmann Gn 1935 p. 440. Kurfess PhW 1935 p . 493-8 and BJ 269 p. 56-7.

354. BAUHOFER, K.: vide nr. 870: 11, V, VI. 1935. R: Kurfess BJ 269 p. 5-6. Influences of Polybius and Posidonius.

355. REcH, H.: Mos maiorum. Wesen und Wirkung der Tradition in Rom; p. 31 sqq. Bedeutung der gloria und virtutes maiorum bei Sallust. Diss. Marburg 1936. R: Kurfess BJ 269 p. 8.

356. BOLAFFI, E.: La concezione sallustiana dello stato e le fonte relative. Pesaro 1936. R: Kurfess PhW 1936 p. 1192. Vegezzi BFC 1936 p. 135. Gervasoni MCI 1937 p. 233.

357. SEEL, 0.: vide nr. 303. 1937. 358. VRETSKA, K.: Geschichtsbild und Weltanschauung bei Sallust. Gy 1937, p. 24-43. The fundamental unity in Sallust's ideas throughout his works; there is no evolution towards pessimism (Schur, nr. 352).

359. BoLAFFI, E.: Religione, fortuna e patria in Sallustio e negli storici anteriori. RIGI 21 (1938), p. 1-34. 1)

Also in Kleine Schriften II (Wiesbaden 1963) p. 39-72.

Memosyne, Suppl. IV

SALLUST

32

360. BOLAFFI, E.: La conception de l'empire dans Salluste et dans Horace. L 3 (1939), p. 98-106. Horace's ideals develop towards a belief in a summus vir; Sallust, on the contrary, abandons the monarchist ideals of his youth.

361. PoscHL, V.: Grundwerte romischer Staatsgesinnung in den Geschichtswerken des Sallust. Berlin 1940. R: Kurfess PhW 1941 p. 151. Egermann DLZ 1943 p. 396-8. Howald G Arb 1941 p. 63. Gohler HZ 1941 p. 124-9. Btichner (nr. 37) p. 85-88. Virtus, Moderatio, lmperium iustum are the main headings under which Sallust's essentially Roman political ideas are studied here.

362. KIRCHNER, W.: Sallust und Cicero als romische Staatstheoretiker im Lateinunterricht. Berl. Gymn. 52 (1941), p. 171. 363. ELEWAUT, E.: Sallustius-studie. Een onderzoek nopens den invloed van sommige hellenistische theorieen op een romeinse historicus. Thesis Leuven 1942-3. R: RBPh 1944 p. 582.

364. HANELL, K.: Bemerkungen zu der politischen Terminologie des Sallustius. Er 43 (1945), p. 263-276. In his use of political terms Sallust shows a remarkable unity and consistency.

365. WORKMAN, J. R.: Economic Causation in Sallust. Summary TAPhA 80 (1949), p. 433. 366. PERROCHAT, P.: Les digressions de Salluste. REL 1950, p. 168-182. Their function in the historical works.

367. BERNERT, J.: Otium. Wiirzb. Jb. 4 (1949-50), p. 89-99. Otium in Cicero, Sallust and Seneca.

368. UrrscHENKO, S.: The development of Sallust's political ideas [in Russian]. VDI 1950, 1 p. 229 sqq. 369. BLASZCZYK, L. T.: In Sallustii Epistulas observationes aliquot. Charisteria Th. Sinko, Varsovia 1951, p. 51-66. S. is a disappointed and rancorous career-man rather than a principled popularis.

370. ERKELL, H.: Augustus, felicitas, fortuna. Lateinische Wortstudien. Goteborg 1952. R- Beranger REL 1952 p. 497-9. P. 147-160 Sallust, 1. Cat. Jug. Hist., 2. Epp. ad Caes.

371. LEGGEWIE, 0.: Die Geisteshaltung der Geschichtsschreiber Sallust und Livius. Gy 60 (1953), p. 343-55. Contrast between the restlessness and the pessimism of S. and the quiet confidence in the future of Livy. Cf. nr. 372.

372. VRETSKA, K.: Die Geisteshaltung der Geschichtsschreiber Sallust und Livius. Gy 61 (1954), p. 191-203. Refutation of nr. 371.

SALLUST

33

373. DIESNER, H. J.: Zur Rolle der Plebs in den Werken des Sallust. Wissensch. Zeitschrift d. E. M. Arndt-Univ., Greifswald 1953-4 p. 37ff.

374. OLIVIERI SANGIACOMO, L.: Sallustio. Firenze 1954. R: Malcovati Ath 1955 p. 368-9. Bardon REL 1955 p. 383-5. Marache REA 1955 p. 396-7. Josserand RBPh 1956 p. 450-2. Clausen AJPh 1956 p. 325-8. Malcolm CIR 1956 p. 136-7. Ernout RPh 1956 p. 137. Leeman Mn 1956 p. 277-8. Dihle Gn 1956 p. 72-4. Plank! AAHG 1958 p. 37. Contents: I Valore de! dato autobiografico. II Biografia di S. III Le Epp. ad Caes. IV Analisi del Cat. V Analisi del Jug. VI Historiae. VII S. storiografo. App. Inv. in Cic. Enthusiastic and positive, but somewhat uncritical appraisal of S. 's achievements.

375. PHILIPP, G. B.: Zur Problematik des romischen Ruhrnesgedankens. Gy 62 (1955) p. 51-82, 287-8. The concept of glory in Cicero and S., reflecting the political crisis in the late republic.

376. A vENARIUS, W.: Die Aneignung entlehnten Gedankengutes in den Werken des Sallust. Thesis Frankfurt a. M. 1955 (typed ms. or microfilm in the Stadtbibliothek Frankfurt).

377. JANDA, J.: Richesse et virtus. Studia A. Salac, Sitzungsber. Ak. Wiss., Praha 1955, p. 61-5. Article in Czech with summaries in Russian and French.

378. ALTHEIM, F.: Poseidonios und Sallust. Studi Francisci. Milano 1956 p. 101-14. 379. UTTSCHENKO, S. L.: Der weltanschaulich-politische Kampf in Rom am Vorabend des Sturzes der Republik. Berlin 1956. R: Beranger Gn 1957 p. 599-602. Staveley CIR 1958 p. 74-6. Vretska Gy 1958 p. 572-3. Translated from the Russian by E. Salewski and W. Seyfarth. See especially part II p. 61-134, I. Die soziale und politische Utopie des I. Jahrhunderts v. u. Z. 2. Die Theorie des Sittenverfalls und ihre politische Bedeutung. 3. Die Entwicklung der politischen Ansichten Sallusts. Anhang I C. Sall. Cr. Briefe an Caesar iiber den Staat (translation).

380. OPPERMANN, H.: Das Menschenbild Sallusts. Gy 65 {1958), p. 18596. Sallust's main interest is in the dark sides of human nature. Ultimately, however, his pessimistic picture serves a positive paedagogic aim.

381. BUCHNER, K. : Sallust. Heidelberg 1960. R: Drexler Gn 1961 p. 567-77. Broughton ClW 1961 p. 90. Ferrero RFIC 1961 p. 438-51. Kriiger Gy 1961 p. 477-8. Marache REA 1960 p. 189-91. Earl JRS 1962 p. 276-7. Pab6n Em 1962 p. 214-6. Contents: 1. Der Politiker (Inv., Epp.). 2. Der Historiker (Proomien, Exkurse, Reden. 3. Leistung (Geschichtsanschauung, Geschichtsbild, Vorganger, Wirkung). The most comprehensive study of S. in recent years. The author has a high opinion of the 'Bildung' and the 'Bildungswert' of his hero.

SALLUST

34

382. KROYMANN, J.: Romisches Sendungs- und Niedergangsbewusstsein. Festschrift Hommel, Tilbingen 1961, p. 69-91. Polybius, Cicero and S. are studied under this point of view.

383. HELLEGOUARC'H, J.: Le vocabulaire latin des relations et des partis politiques sous la republique. Paris 1963. Though Sallust's terminology is not treated systematically, he is often quoted in connections which throw light upon his views and their relation to those of Cicero and others.

383A. SYME, R.: Sallust. Univ. of Calif. Press, 1964.

I The problem, II S. 's antecedents, III The political scene, IV S. 's career, V From politics to history, VI The Bell. Cat., VII The credulity of S., VIII Caesar and Cato, IX S.'s purpose, X The Bell. Jug.: Warfare, XI The Bell. Jug.: politics, XII The Hist., XIII The time of writing, XIV History and style, XV The fame of S. App. I Evolution of S. 's style, App. II The false S.

2. The Prologues. 384. SCHINDLER, F.: nr. 46, p. 97. Exkurs 9. 1939. Short history of the problem.

385. BALAU, S.: De !'introduction au recit de la conjuration de Catilina (Salluste). L'Ens Chr 1 (1882), p. 53-5. 386. ANTOINE, F. : Les prefaces de Salluste. Memoires Acad. d. sciences inscr. b. lettres de Toulouse, VIiie serie IO (1888), p. 301-303. 387. WACHSMUTH, C.: vide nr. 341, p. 662. 1895. In the prologues Sallust follows the example of Posidonius.

388. NORDEN, E.: Aeneis Buch VI, p. 37 Anm. 1. Leipzig 1916 2 • Posidonius' influence.

389. BOISSIER, G.: Les prologues de Salluste. JS 1903, p. 59-66. R: Kurfess BJ 183 p. 136-7. Importance of the prologues for our knowledge of Sallust's psyche; disappointed in his political career, he seeks glory as a historian.

390. FOURNIER, A. : La parole et l'acte chez Salluste, ancien proconsul d' Afrique, d'apres les preambules de ses ouvrages. Revue Afric. 50 (1906), p. 92-102. 391. NACK, R. DE: Les prefaces de Salluste. Rev. de Fribourg 28 (1907), p. 499-513. 392. ENGEL, G.: De antiquorum epicorum didacticorum historicorum prooemiis: p. 65-6 Sallust. Diss. Marburg 1910. R: Kurfess BJ 183 p. 134. The T6no, in the prologues.

SALLUST

35

393. WAGNER, C.: De Sallustii prooemiorum fontibus. Diss. Leipzig 1910. R: Klotz BPhW 1912 p. 716-7. Kurfess BJ 183 p. 133. The prologues are based on the Protrepticus of Posidonius, which the author tries to prove with the help of parallel passages.

394. LAQUEUR, R.: Ephoros 2. p. 347-50. H 46, (1911). Sallust borrowed the technique of his prologues from Ephoros.

395. WINS, J.: Salluste. Prooemium de la conjuration de Catilina. NV 1 (1912), p. 395-405. A superficial analysis.

396. GERHAUSSER, W. : Der Protreptikos des Poseidonios. Diss. Heidelberg. 1912. Its influence on the prologues of Sallust.

397. THEISSEN,

w.: vide nr. 344.

1912.

Posidonius.

398. JAEGER, W. W.: Nemesios von Emesa, p. 130-1. Berlin 1914. Traces of Posidonius in Sallust's prologues.

399. MORR, J.: Die Entstehung der Einleitungen von Sallusts helium Catilinae und Jugurthinum. Pr. Troppau 1914. R: Heussner ZG 1915 p. 390. Kurfess BJ 183 p. 134. Analysis of the prologues, written after the example of Posidonius.

400. EGERMANN, F.: Die Prooemien zu den Werken des Sallust. SBAkW Wien 214, 3 (1932). R: Schur nr. 401. Kurfess BJ 252 p. 72-7. Das Problem. Die Leitgedanken der Proomien. Die Stellung der Pr. im Gesamtwerk. Die Quellenfrage. Sallusts Synthese. Charakteristiken. Das Sallustbild. Against the alleged Stoic influences on the prologues. From Plato Sallust borrowed the frame; the contents and the atmosphere are essentially Roman (Cicero, Dicaearchus). They contain some personal confessions, but their purpose is to point out the principles of his historiography and his conception of history, which is optimistic (against Schur and the communis opinio).

401. SCHUR, W.: Nachtriigliches zu Sallust. Kl 11 (1936), p. 60-75. R: Kurfess BJ 269 p. 6-7.

Maintains against Egermann (nr. 400) the Stoic origin of the ideas in the prologues. Comp. nr. 311. - Egermann answers in Gn 1937 p. 240-7 (R. of Schur nr. 311).

402. PANTZERHIELM-THOMAS, (1936), p. 140-162.

s.:

The prologues of Sallust.

so

15-16

R: Kurfess BJ 269 p. 6. Points out against Egermann that the apparently Platonic thoughts in the prologues came to Sallust via intermediate Stoic sources.

403. BoLAFFI, E.: I proemi delle monografie di Sallustio. Ath 16 (1938), p. 128-57. The prologues are closely connected with the rest of the works (following Egermann nr. 400). They are influenced by many different authors, mainly Plato and Stoic writers (compromise between Egermann and PantzerhielmThomas nr. 402).

36

SALLUST

404. POSCHL, V.: vide nr. 361: p. 27-37. 1940. The prologues do not represent the principles of Sallust's conception of history, but a typically Roman defence of his farewell to politics and his choice of historiography.

405. SCALAIS, R.: Quelques considerations sur l'introduction de ,,De coniuratione Catilinae" de Salluste. NV 22 (1941), p. 242-5. 406. RAMBAUD, M.: Les prologues de Salluste et la demonstration morale dans son oeuvre. REL 24 (1946), p. 115-30. R: Bi.ichner (nr. 37) p. 85 n. 3. The prologues contain Sallust's points of view in writing history: human nature, glory, the hero.

407. BIGNONE, E.: Problemi e orientamenti di letteratura latina, in: Prob!. e orient. di lett., Milano 1949. P. 83: the Protrepticus of Aristotle is the source of Sallust's proems. Comp. Bignone: Storia della letteratura latina III (Firenze 1950) p. 221-3.

408. OLIVIERI SANGIACOMO, L.: vide nr. 374, p. 79-85 (Cat.), p. 155-166 (Jug.). 409. LEEMAN, A. D.: Sallusts Prologe und seine Auffassung von der Historiographie. I Das Catilina-Proomium. Mn 7 (1954), p. 323-39. Cf. nr. 410.

410. LEEMAN, A. D.: Sallusts Prologe und seine Auffassung von der Historiographie. II Das Jugurtha-Proomium. Mn 8 (1955) p. 38-48. In this and the preceding article a structural analysis of the prologues is attempted. From their very beginnings these passages aim at an interpretation of S. 's life in politics and historiography.

411. VRETSKA, K. : Sallusts Selbstbekenntnis (Bell. Cat. 3, 3-4, 2). Eranos 53 (1955) p. 41-60. The passage is a sincere confession of guilt rather than a refined apology.

412. STEIDLE, W.: vide nr. 718. 1958. P. 105-10 zum Pr. d. Bell. Jug. 413. LA PENNA, A.: 11 significato dei proemi Sallustiani. Maia 11 (1959) p. 23-43; 89-119. The proems, though not showing attachment to political groups, seem to advocate certain political reforms.

414. BtkHNER, K.: vide nr. 381. 1960. P. 93-120 Die Proomien.

The proems as an interpretation of his life and his spiritual situation.

415. EARL, D. C.: vide nr. 337. 1961. P. 5-17 The political theory: the prologues. The proems are an elaboration of S. 's concept of virtus.

415B. JANSON, T.: Latin Prose Prefaces. Stockholm 1964. P. 64-82 the historians.

SALLUST

37

3. Influences of Greek authors. 416. MoLLMANN, E.: Quatenus Sallustius e scriptorum Graecorum exemplo pendeat. Pr. Konigsberg 1878. R: Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 174. With a list of all the passages concerned (Thucydides, Demosthenes, lsocrates, Plato and Xenophon).

417. LATTE, K.: vide nr. 315: p. 15-19: Graecisms. 1935. Sallust's imitations of Greek authors are a proof of a lack of imagination. R: Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 174.

417A. PALADINI, V.: vide nr. 332. 1948. Cap. II, III. 418. PERROCHAT, P.: Les modeles grecs de Salluste. Paris 1949. R: Durry IL 1949 p. 72. Boyance REA 1949 p. 169-171. Paratore nr. 36· Perret REL 1949 p. 306-8. Herrmann L 1949 p. 179. Emout RPh 1950 p. 228 De Saint-Denis RU 1950 p. 90-1. Thucydides, Hellenistic historiography, Plato, Xenophon, lsocrates, Demosthenes.

419. AvENARIUS, W.: Sallust und der rhetorische Schulunterricht. RIL 89-90 (1956) p. 343-52. Rhetorical and topical character of S. 's imitations of Greek authors. Cf. nr. 420.

420. AVENARIUS, W.: Die griechischen Vorbilder des Sallust. SO 33 (1957), p. 48-86. Additions to Perrochat's lists (cf. nr. 418). Limitations of S. 's choice of models.

421. BUCHNER, K.: vide nr. 381. 1960. P. 326-56: Vorgiinger. Thucydides. 422. DoLEGA, S. : De Sallustio imitatore Thucydidis etc. Diss. Breslau 1871. 423. RoB0LSKY, J.: Sallustius in conformanda oratione quo iure Thucydidis exemplum secutus esse existimetur. Diss. Halle 1881. 424. SCHILD, R.: Quibus in rebus Sallustius Thucydidem respexerit aut respexisse credatur. Pr. Nordhausen 1888. R: Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 174.

425. KORNEMANN, E. : Thucydides und die romische Historiographie. Ph 68 (1904), p. 144-153. 426. MACK, K. : Quae ratio intercedat inter Sallustii et Thucydidis historias. Pr. Kremsier 1906. 427. MACK, K.: Quos locos Thucydidis imitatus esse Sallustius vere existimetur. Pr. Kremsier 1907.

38

SALLUST

428. STREBEL, H. G.: Wertung und Wirkung des thukydideischen Geschichtswerkes in der griechisch-romischen Literatur; p. 31 : Sallust. Diss. Miinchen 1935. R: Kurfess BJ 269 p. 5.

429. BAUHOFER, K.: vide nr. 870: p. 145 sqq. 1935. 430. BENNEZON: vide nr. 469. 1935. 431. PATZER, H.: Sallust und Thukydides. NJ 116 (1941), p. 124-136. Studies the parallel passages in order to penetrate into the aims of both writers.

432. STOCK, L. : Die Geschichtsauffassung bei Thucydides und Sallust. Diss. Freiburg i. Br. 1946 [not printed]. 433. PERROCHAT, P.: Salluste et Thucydide. REL 25 (1947), p. 90-121. R: Biichner (nr. 37) p. 89 n. 2. Apart from the imitation of a number of passages of Thucydides, there is a similarity in their conception of history and in their style. Comp. nr. 418.

434. CAMPICHE, E. : Etude comparative sur Thucydide et Salluste. Lecture in the Univ. of Genava, summarized in REL 1948 p. 75.

435. ATSABES, A.: L'aA.?.ovarto; xai 0ovxvMtJri;. Platon 1 (1949), p. 87-93.

a

436. LEEMAN, A. D.: Le genre et le style historique Rome. Theories et pratique. REL 33 (1955), p. 183-208. Sallust's 'Thucydideanism'.

437. LEEMAN, A. D.: Orationis Ratio. The stylistic theories and practice of the Roman orators, historians and philosophers. Amsterdam 1963. On p. 179-87 Sallust's relations to Thucydides and contemporary Thucydideanism are expounded.

437 A. KLINZ, A.: Das Bild des Menschen bei Thukydides und Sallust. Der Altspr. Unterricht 3, 3 (1957), p. 51-64. Xenophon. 438. MDNSCHER, K.: Xenophon in der griechisch-romischen Literatur. Ph Suppl. 13, 2, Leipzig 1920. R: Kurfess BJ 193 p. 49. Passages from the Memorabilia and the Cyropaedia in Sallust.

439. SKARo, E.: Xenophon-Sallust. PhW 1925, p. 462. R: Kurfess BJ 212 p. 3. Passages of the Agesilaus reflected in Sallust's works.

440. KESELING, P.: Xenophons Anabasis in Sallusts Bellum Jugurthinum? PhW 1936, p. 1326-8. R: Vysoky LF. 1937 p. 220 sqq. Kurfess BJ 269 p. 10-11.

SALLUST

39

Demosthenes. 441. KORNITZER, A.: Zu Sallusts Catilina c. 52. Z0G 38 (1887) p. 511. R: Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 175. Cat. 52, 19 reflects Dem. Phil. III 40.

442. KORNITZER, A.: Nachbildung demosthenischer Stellen bei Sallust und Tacitus. WSt 19 (1897), p. 158-60. R: Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 175. Cat. 51, 19 reflects Dem. Phil. III 61.

443. GUILBERT, D.: Salluste, Oratio Lepidi et la Ile Olythienne. LEC 25 (1957), p. 296-9. Or. Lep. 24 imitates Olynth. 2,20; moreover the whole speech is inspired by that of Demosthenes.

Plato. 444. NOHL, H.: Zu Sall. Jug. 3. WklPh 1905, p. 502; 701-2. Plato Ep. VII and Jug. 3, 2.

445. LAST, H.: vide nr. 622. 1923. R: Kurfess BJ 212 p. 17. Plato's Vllth Ep. in Sallust's works

446. £GERMANN, F.: vide nr. 400. 1932. R: Kurfess BJ 252 p. 39. The Platonic influences in the prologues.

D.

SALLUST: THE ARTIST

I. General Studies. 447. REITZENSTEIN, R.: Hellenistische Wundererziihlungen p. 84-9. Leipzig 1906. R: Lauckner (nr. 782) p. 59 sqq. Latte (nr. 315) p. 30.

Sallust's historiography is based on the principles of the Hellenistic doctrine in Cic. Fam. V 12 (to Lucceius); the monographs are dramatic in character and seem to be composed in five acts.

448. LAUCKNER, C.: vide nr. 782. 1911. 449. ALHEIT, L.: vide nr. 292. 1919. Sallust's method of characterization.

450. FUNAIOLI, G.: vide nr. 293, p. 1940-3: das Kilnstlerische. 1920. 451. PFISTER, F. : Ein Kompositionsgesetz der antiken Kunstprosa. PhW 1922, p. 1195-2000. The structure of Sallust's works.

452. BOLAFFI, E.: vide nr. 305. 1931. Brevitas, psychology and composition.

40

SALLUST

453. PoPLAWSKI, M. S.: Remarques sur la forme litteraire des oeuvres de Salluste. Eos 34 (1932-'3), p. 373-91. 454. BOLAFFI, E.: Sallustio nel quadro della storiografia latina. MCI 1934, p. 84-97. R: PhW 1934 p. 391. Sallust was the first Roman historian to conceive history as a drama.

455. LATTE, K.: vide nr. 315: II. 1935. 456. BAUHOFER, K.: vide nr. 870. 1935. 457. VRETSKA, K.: Sallust als Ktinstler. Mitteil. d. Arb. gemeinsch. d. Altphilol. Osterreichs IX 1936. (comp. Gy 49, 1938, p. 47). 458. VRETSKA, K.: vide nr. 713. 1937. 459. PFISTER, F.: Vokalaberglaube in der romischen Literatur. ARW 34 (1937), p. 385. R: Kurfess BJ 269 p. 11. The first words of the Jugurtha, like those of other works of Roman authors, contain all the vowels.

460. PERROCHAT, P.: vide nr. 791, p. 198-200: La composition; p. 200-4: La maniere; p. 205-6: Les procedes. 1943. 461. SKARD, E.: Die Bildersprache des Sallust. SO Suppl. 11 (1943), Serta Eitremiana, p. 141-164. Sallust's metaphors reveal much of his personality.

462. VRETSKA, K.: Bemerkungen zum Bau der Charakteristik bei Sallust. so 31 (1955), p. 105-18. 463. L0FSTEDT, E.: Roman Literary Portraits. Oxford 1958. Ch. V Sallust (p. 93-117). 463A. CHAUSSERIE-LAPREE, J. P.: Les structures et les techniques narratives chez les historiens latins. REL 41 (1963), p. 281-96. 2. The speeches and letters. 464. LALLIER, R.: vide nr. 749. 1881. 465. SCHNORR VON CAROLSFELD, H.: vide nr. 105. 1. The speeches characterize the speakers; comparison with Thucydides; the language of the speeches is Sallust's. 2. Analysis of the various speeches. 3. Conclusions.

466. GERSTENBERG, C.: Ober die Reden bei Sallust. Pr. Berlin 1892. R: Opitz WklPh 1893 p. 464 sq. Schlee JPhVB 1895 p. 102-4.

467. PETER, H. : Der Brief in der romischen Literatur; p. 170. Leipzig 1901.

SALLUST

41

468. ULLMAN, R.: La technique des discours clans Salluste, Tite-Live et Tacite. La matiere et la composition. Ch. I (p. 24-48): Salluste. Oslo 1927. R: Johnson CIR 1928 p. 198. Ernout RPh 1928 p. 368. Klotz PhW 1929 p. 533-6. Kroll DLZ 1929 p. 362. Rhetorical analyses are given of all the speeches; they are 'des etudes de caracteres en forme de rhetorique'. Comp. nr. 531.

469. BENNEZON: Les procedes clans Jes discours de Salluste et !'influence de Thucydide. MES Fae. Paris (1935). R: REL 1935 p. 358.

470. CESAREO, E.: Le orazioni nell'opera di Sallustio. Palermo 1938. R: Way CIR 1938 p. 198. Emout RPh 1939 p. 265. Kurfess PhW 1939 p. 450. Seel DLZ 1939 p. 584.

E. THE LANGUAGE OF SALLUST I. Lexicographica. 471. DIETSCH, R.: vide nr. 180. Vol. II, p. 143 sqq.: Index. 1859. 472. EICHERT, 0.: Vollstandiges Worterbuch zu den Geschichtswerken des C. Sallustius Crispus. Hannover 18712, 18904 • 473. NATTA, F.: Vocabulario Sallustiano. Torino 1894. 474. SKARD, E.: Index verborum quae exhibent Sallustii epistulae ad Caesarem. SO fasc. suppl. 3 (1930). R: Faider RBPh 1932 p. 148.

475. EDMAR, B.: vide nr. 635, p. 161 sqq.: Index Verborum [in Epistulis]. 476. KuRFESS. A.: vide nr. 148. p. 25 sqq.: Index vocabulorum potiorum [in Invectivis]. 476A. VRETSKA, K.: vide nr. 149, II p. 253-9: Index verborum quae in invectiva inveniuntur. 477. MAURENBRECHER, R.: vide nr. 240, II p. 253 sqq.: Index verborum [in Historiis]. 478. MOLLER, G.: Phraseologie des Sallust. Pr. Cothen I 1888, II 1890, III 1894. 479. N0EDELCHEN, H.: Einige Worter aus Sallusts Bellum Cat. und Bellum Jug. in ihrem Bedeutungswandel... ftir den Schulgebrauch zusammengestellt. Pr. Nauen 1914. 480. GEER, R. M.: A lexicon of vituperation. CIW 27 (1929), p. 208 sqq. Inter alia in Sallust.

481. HooERMANN, M.: Sallusts militarische Ausdrticke nach Gruppen geordnet und tibersetzt. Pr. Wernigerode 1911.

42

SALLUST

482. LEHMANN: Le vocabulaire militaire clans le Jugurtha de Salluste. MES Paris 1935. R: REL 1935 p. 358.

483. ADLER, K.: De Taciteo atque Sallustiano verborum peregrinorum usu et compensatione. Diss. Wien 1930. 2. General Studies. 484. ANSCHUTZ, A.: Selecta capita de syntaxi Sallustiana. Halle 1873. R: Wolfflin BJ 2 p. 1666 sq. Sallust's use of substantives, adjectives, adverbs, continued by nr. 485.

485. HELLWIG, L.: Zur Syntax des Sallust. Theil I. Pr. Ratzeburg 1877 1). R: Eussner BJ 10 p. 162. Continues nr. 484: subordinating conjunctions.

486. CONSTANS, L.: De sermone Sallustiano. Paris 1880. R: Riemann RCr 1881, 2 p. 161-167, 173-184, 189-198.

487. RAMORINI, F.: De singulari Sallustii stilo dialogus. Torino 1880. 488. IHM, G.: Quaestiones syntacticae de elocutione tacitea comparata Caesaris Sallusti Vellei usu loquendi. Diss. Giessen 1882. 489. BRAUN, R.: Beitrage zur Statistik des Sprachgebrauches Sallusts im Catilina und Jugurtha. Pr. Diisseldorf 1885. 490. HAULER, E.: Sprachliches zu Sallust. ALL 3 (1886), p. 535-9. The new data for Sallust's language in the palimpsest fragments of Orleans.

491. KUNZE, A.: Sallustiana. Leipzig I 1892 2), II 1893, III 1897-8. R: I Wolfflin ALL 1892 p. 152. Prammer DLZ 1892 p. 1171. Schlee JphVB 1895 p. 109 sqq. II Schlee I.e. Opitz WklPh 1893 p. 1345-7. Prammer DLZ 1893 p. 1607. Schmalz BPhW 1894 p. 492-5. Landgraf BBG 1894. Weinber_ger NPhR 1898 p. 54. III Weinberger I.e. and NphR 1898 p. 340. Novak ZOG 1898 p. 120, 1899 p. 27. Schlee JPhVB 1898 p. 100-14. I 1. Ac und atque vor Conson. 2. A und ab vor Conson. 3. E und ex. 4. adversus, -m; rursus, -m; dein, -de. II Der Gebrauch von fore, futurum esse, foret, forent, essem und seine Formen (comp. nr. 548). III Zur Stilistik. 1. Beitrag zu einer Darstellung der genetischen Entwicklung des Sallustianischen Stils. 2. Die Stellung, Wiederhohlung und Weglassung der Praepositionen.

492. FIGHIERA, L. S. : La lingua e la gramatica di C. Sallustio Crispo. 18961, 19012, 19053 • R: Maurenbrecher BPhW 1905 p. 217 sqq. Opitz WklPh 1901 p. 625 sqq.

Bornecque RPh 1901 p. 280. Valmaggi BFC 1901 p. 29-31. Lejay RCI 1902 p. 163.

493. FERRARA, J.: In Sallustianam elocutionem annotatiunculae. Genova 1898. 1) 1)

Theil II has never been published. This part was the author's 'Dissertation'.

SALLUST

43

494. NORDEN, E.: Die antike Kunstprosa Ip. 200-4. Leipzig 19153 • The literary background of Sallust's style (imitation of Thucydides; contemporary rhetorics).

495. FUNAIOLI, G.: vide nr. 293, p. 1943-6: Stil und Sprache. 1920. 496. CESAREO, E.: vide nr. 43; p. 11 sqq.: Lo stile Sallustiano. 1924. 497. KROLL, W.: Die Sprache des Sallust. GI 15 (1927) p. 280-305. R: Kurfess BJ 252 p. 26-8. Sallust combines archaistic features with Atticism. His style fits his misanthropy.

498. LOFSTEDT, E.: Syntactica 11, p. 290-4. Lund-London 1933. 499. LATTE, K.: vide nr. 315: I. 1935. R: Kurfess BJ 252 p. 31-2.

500. GOLDSCHMIDT, V.: Syntaxe et style chez Salluste. MES Paris 1936. R: REL 1936 p. 389.

501. PERROCHAT, P.: vide nr. 791, p. 208-14: Le style. 1943. 502. BoLAFFI, E.: Le style et la langue de Salluste. Phoibos 6-7 (1951-2, 1952-3), p. 57-96. Detailed study of S. 's language and his archaisms.

502A. FONTAINE, J.: Reflexions ciceroniennes sur le style de Salluste. IL 14 (1962), p. 204-11. Cicero and S. are not stylistic antipodes; there are similarities and relations between them.

503. LEEMAN, A. D.: vide nr. 437. 1963. 503A. SYME, R.: vide nr. 383. Ch. XIV, App. I. 1964. 503B. SICARD, E.: Zur sprachlichen Entwicklungdes Sallust. SO 39 (1964), p. 13-36. 3. Main Characteristics: archaisms, poetisms, vulgarisms, variatio, brevitas, rhetoric. 504. SCHULTZE, P.: De archaismis Sallustianis. Diss. Halle 1871. 505. BRUNNERT, G.: De Sallustio imitatore Catonis Sisennae aliorumque veterum historicorum Romanorum. Diss. Jena 1873. R: Wolffiin BJ 2 p. 1663 sqq.

506. ERNOUT, A.: Salluste et Caton. IL 1949, p. 61-5. The influence of Cato Maior on Sallust.

507. BRAUN, E.: Quatenus in sermone Sallustiano poetica lectaque dictio reperiatur. Diss. Wien 1929. 508. SKARD, E.: Ennius und Sallustius. Eine sprachliche Untersuchung. Avhandl. Norske Yid. Ak. Oslo 1933, 4. R: Kroll DLZ 1933 p. 2372. Klotz PhW 1934 p. 745-9. Dahlmann Gn 1935 p. 312-6 (!) Kurfess BJ 252 p. 28-9. Sallust's archaisms often derive from the epic language of Ennius.

SALLUST

44

509. CAVALLIN, S.: Det episka inslaget i Sallustius' stil. Er 35 (1937), p. 68-101. R: Kurfess BJ 269 p. 21-3.

510. SKARD, E.: Sallust und seine Vorgiinger. Eine sprachliche Untersuchung. SO Fasc. Suppl. 15. Oslo 1956. R: Andre BSL 1956 p. 46-8. Martin JRS 1957 p. 284. Dihle Gn 1957 p. 592-9. Leeman Mn 1957 p. 181-3. Marache REA 1957 p. 169-70. Hyart L 1957 p. 496-8. Emout RPh 1958 p. 166. Laughton CIR 1958 p. 50-1. Westendorp Boerma M 1958 p. 186-8. Bassett C!Ph 1959 p. 206-8.

511. WoLFFLIN, E.: Bemerkungen ilber das Vulgiirlatein. Ph 34 (1875), p. 137-165. Sallust's vulgarisms are an expression of his democratic sympathies (refuted by Kroll nr. 497).

512. KRAUT, K.: Ober das vulgiire Element in der Sprache des SallustPr. Blaubeuren 1881. R: Schlee JPhVB 1890 p. 66 sqq.

513. URI, J.: Quatenus apud Sallustium sermonis latini plebei aut coti. diani vestigia appareant. Paris 1885. R: Thomas RIPB 1887 p. 383-5.

514. BosscHE, J. VAN DEN: De variatio sermonis bij Sallustius. Thesis Leuven 1935-6. R: RBPh 1936 p. 1243.

515. DANEZ: La variatio sermonis chez Salluste. MES Paris 1937. R: REL 1937 p. 344.

516. BoLAFFI, E. : De Sallustii dicendi brevitate. Diss. Forli 1910. R: Kroll GI 1914 p. 351 sq.

517. VALLET, G.: La brachylogie chez Salluste. MES Paris 1939. R: REL 1939 p. 392.

517A. AVENARIUS,

w.:

vide nr. 376. 1956.

4. Word Order and Period Structure; Clausulae; Copulative Particles. 518. MEYER, K.: Die Wort- und Satzstellung bei Sallust, I. Pr. Magdeburg 1880. 519. ROHDE, D.: Adjectivum quo ordine apud Sallustium coniunctum sit cum substantivo. Hamburg 1887. R: Opitz Wk!Ph 1888 p. 95-8.

520. RECKZEY, A.: Ober grammatische und rhetorische Stellung des Adjektivums bei den Annalisten, Cato und Sallust. Pr. Berlin 1888. R: Eussner BPhW 1889, p. 890-3. Scheindler DLZ 1888 p. 424-5. Schlee JPhVB 1895 p. 107-9.

SALLUST

45

521. STEELE, R. B.: Chiasmus in Sallust, Caesar, Tacitus and Justinus. Diss. Baltimore I 892. 522. WoLFFLIN, E.: Zurn Asyndeton bei Sallust. ALL 11 (1898) p. 27-35. R: Schlee JPhVB 1900 p. 322 sqq.

523. AHLBERG, A. W.: vide nr. 77. Pars III, cap. II, 2: De asyndeto. Also deals with other aspects of period structure and with the clausulae.

524. AHLBERG, A. W.: De traiectionis figura ab antiquissimis prosae scriptoribus latinis adhibita, p. 95 sqq.: Sallustius. Er 11 (19ll), p. 87-101. 525. KOESTLER, E.: Untersuchungen ilber das Verhfiltnis von Satzrhythmus und Wortstellung bei Sallust. Diss. Bern 1931. R: Ernout RCr 1934 p. 124. Klotz PhW 1933 p. 679-84. Edmar Gn 1933 p. 666-8. Kurfess BJ 252 p. 30-1.

526. PATTERSON, G.: The Position of the Possessive Pronoun in Sallust. Diss. Iowa, no date. 527. VOGEL, W. S.: Zur Stellung von esse bei Caesar und Sallust. Diss. Tilbingen 1937. 528. FANKHANEL, H.: Verbund Satz in der lateinischen Prosa bis Sallust. Diss. Leipzig 1938. 529. GROOT, A. W. DE: De numero oratorio Latino. Diss. Groningen 1919 1). R: Ammon BPh 1920 p. 244 sqq. Sallust in his clausulae belongs to the historical, not the rhetorical tradition.

530. GROOT, A. W. DE: Der antike Prosarythmus p. 76 sqq. Groningen, Den Haag 1921. Comp. nr. 529.

531. ULLMAN, R. : Les clausules metriques dans les discours de Salluste, Tite-Live, Tacite. SO 3 (1925), p. 65-75. 532. CARNEVALI, M. P.: Clausole metriche e critica del testo. AR 5 (1960), p. 91-9. The author believes that Sallust's text has been adapted to the principles of Ciceronian clausulae at the end of the 1st century A.O. CT. nr. 533.

533. CARNEVALI, M. P.: Richerche sul ritmo della prosa sallustiana. Atti Accad. Tosc. La Colombaria, Firenze 1960, p. 161-220. R: Ronconi AR 6 (1961) p. 243. ') Sallust's clausulae are also dealt with in Kroll (nr. 497), Koestler (nr. 525, Anhang, p. 76-9), May (sub nr. 573), Kurfess (nr. 572), Novotny (nr. 615), Edmar (nr. 635) and Chouet (648).

SALLUST

46

533A. PERRET, J.: Salluste et la prose metrique. Problemes de methode et de perspective historiques. REA 66 (1963) p. 330-50; summary REL 1962, p. 40-50. S. applies the rules of Atticist historians, conf. Dion. Hal.

534. MENDELL, C. W.: Latin Sentence Connection. New Haven (Yale U.P.) 1917. Deals inter alia with Sallust.

535. BOKMANN, E.: De particulis copulativis apud Sallustium Crispum. Diss. Goteborg 1887. 536. ANTOINE, F.: Sur l'emploi de quelques particules dans Salluste. AFL Bordeaux 1889 p. 51-73. Sed, ceterum, quidem, equidem.

537. DOMERCQ-HERRE, J.: L'usage des particules de liaison dans le Catilina de Salluste. MES Paris 1942. R: REL 1942 p. 174.

537A. FRAZER, R. M.: Nam-clauses in Sallust. C!Ph 56 (1961), p. 251-2. 5. Grammatical and Syntactical Questions. 538. GROSSMANN, F.: Ober das Gebrauch der Kasus bei Sallust. Pr. Berlin 1886. R: Schlee JPhVB 1890 p. 70 sq.

539. GoRLITZ, K.: De genetivi usu Sallustiano. Pr. Schrimm 1878. R: Meusel JPhVB 1880 p. 80 sqq.

540. BIEDL, A.: Zur Dativkonstruktion bei Sallust. Ph W 48 (1928), p. 1148-9. 541. LEHMANN, A.: De verborum compositorum quae apud Sallustium .•. leguntur cum dativo structura commentatio. Pars I. Leobschtitz 1884. R: Sabbadini Cultura 5 p. 769.

542. HERCHER, A.: Ober das Gebrauch des Accusativs bei Sallust. Pr. Gera 1878. R: Meusel JPhVB 1880 p. 76 sqq.

543. CHRIST, 0.: De ablativo Sallustiano. Diss. Jena 1883. R: Schlee JPhVB 1890 p. 70 sqq.

544. WILCKENS, K.: Beitrii.ge zur Syntax des Sallusts. Pr. Lahr 1888. Prepositions with the accusative.

545. DEMBITZER, Z.: De rationis mutuae apud Sallustium significatione. Pr. Kolomea 1893. R: Halm Eos 1894 p. 168.

SALLUST

47

546. NAYLOR, H. D.: On the so-called ,,indeclinable or absolute" use of ipse and allied constructions. CIR 15 (1901), p. 314-7. In Sallust a.o.

547. WAGENER, C.: Beitriige zur lateinischen Formenlehre. I. Die Perfectbildungen auf - vi bei Sallust ... Pr. Bremen 1878. 548. KUNST, K.: Bedeutung und Gebrauch der zu der Wurzel Ju gehorigen Verbalformen bei Sallust. Jhrb. d. k. k. Staatsgymn. im XIX. Bezirk v. Wien. 1895-6. R: Opitz WklPh 1896 p. 1341-2. Schmalz BPhW 1896 p. 1642-5. Blase ALL 1898 p. 299-301. Golling ZOG 1898 p. 380-1. Schlee JPhVB 1898 p. 100-14. Compare Kunze nr. 491 (II).

549. STCHERBATCHEFF: Etude sur !'expression du temps chez Salluste. MES Paris 1937. R: REL 1937 p. 345.

550. HELM, F.: Quaestiones syntacticae de participiorum usu tacitino, velleiano, sallustiano. Diss. Giessen 1879, complete: Leipzig 1879. 551. STITZ, A.: Ober das Gerundium im Allgemeinen und seine Verwendung bei Sallust. Pr. Krems 1889. R: Hergel WklPh 1890 p. 210-11. Burckhardt ZOG 1900 p. 564-6. Schlee JPhVB 1895 p. 109.

552. MACKAY, L. A.: A Syntactical Experiment of Sallust. ClPh 1941 p. 280. Use of genit. gerund. in adverbial sense.

553. SORN, J.: Beitriige zur lateinischen Grammatik: der Infinitiv bei Sallust, Florus, Eutrop und Persius. Pr. Halle 1887. R: Stolz ZOG 1888 p 844-5.

554. TOSATTO, C.: De praesenti historico apud Sallustium, Velleium, Valerium, Curtium, Florum. Padova 1905. R: ALL 1905 p. 439.

555. KOLLER, H. : Praesens historicum und erziihlendes lmperfekt. Beitrag zur Aktionsart der Praesens-Stammzeiten im Lateinischen und Griechischen. MH 8 (1951) p. 63-99. 556. HUEBENTAL, C.: Quaestiones de usu infinitivi historici apud Sallustium et Taciturn. Diss. Halle 1881. R: Schlee JPhVB 1890, p. 68 sq.

557. SORIA, C. : De nuevo el arte de Salustio. Revista de Estudios Clasicos 5 (1952) p. 11-26. Parataxis and infinitivus historicus. Memosyne. Suppl. IV

5

SALLUST

48

558. MuGLER, CH.: Formes nominates du verbe en grec et en Iatin. RPh 9 (1935), p. 33-58. R: Kurfess BJ 269 p. 24.

559. PERROCHAT, P.: Apropos de I'infinitif de narration. Tacite imitateur de Salluste dans !'Agricola. REL 13 (1935), p. 261-5. R: Kroll GI 1938 p. 51.

560. UBER, F.: Quaestiones aliquot Sallustianae grammaticae et criticae. Diss. Gottingen 1882. 1. Quaestiones grammaticae: De pron. pers. et dem. subiecti locum obtinente. De pron. ind. ,,man". De plur. q. v. modestiae. De infin. hist. De inf. et a.c. i. pro subi. positis. De verbis copul. De nom. praedic. definientibus. De verbi defectione. 2. Quaestiones criticae (vide nr. 837, 1005).

561. LosCHHORN, K.: Kleine grammatische und kritische Bemerkungen zu Sallust. BPhW 1919 p. 45-8. Quippe qui with indic. (comp. nr. 562); locos instead of loca.

562. KUNZE, A.: Zu Sallust. BPhW 1919 p. 860-4. Quippe qui with indic. etc.; against Loschhorn's method (nr. 561).

563. VALLEJO, J.: Quippe (qui). Em 16 (1948), p. 201-20. In Sallust a.o.

564. ANDREWES, M.: The function of tense variation in the subjunctive mood of oratio obliqua. CIR, N.S. 1 (1951) p. 142-6. The rules of o.o. in Cicero, Sallust (fairly strict), Caesar, Livy, Tacitus.

564A. HENSCHEL, E.: Zur Versparung, einer Ahart des Caesar und Sallust. Gy 60 (1953), p. 52-3.

and

Kotvov,

bei

V. STUDIES ON SALLUST'S WORKS A.

INVECTIVA IN CICERONEM

565. EuSSNER, A.: BJ 10 p. 204-7 (vide nr. 15). 1878.

Notes by Jordan, Maurenbrecher, Schmidt, Vogel, Wirz, Wolfflin (1874-'77).

566. JORDAN, H.: vide nr. 54. 1876. Both works are spurious.

567. VOGEL, F.: vide nr. 1204. cap. II De pseudo-Sallustii in Tullium et invicem invectivis, 1878. 568. WIRZ, H.: Sallustius in Ciceronem, ein klassisches Sttick Anticicero. Festg. M. Btidingers, Innsbruck 1898, p. 91-116.

R: Maurenbrecher BPhW 1899 p. 298-303. Schlee JPhVB 1900 p. 309 sqq.

Kurfess BJ 183 p. 185. Interesting forgery dating from the time after Caesar's death.

569. REITZENSTEIN, R.: Pseudo-Sallusts Invektive gegen Cicero. H 33 (1898), p. 87-101. R: Schlee JPhVB 1900 p. 309 sqq. Kurfess BJ 183 p. 184. The two invectivae cannot have been written by the same author. The Inv. in Cic. was written before 54 BC.

570. SCHWARTZ, E.: Pseudo-Sallusts Invektive gegen Cicero. H 33 (1898), p. 101-8. R: Kurfess BJ 183 p. 185. Inv. in Cic. is by Piso Caesoninus, Caesar's father-in-law; thesis accepted by Ed. Meyer (nr. 587) and Lehmann-Haupt (nr. 589).

571. CsEREP, J.: Quid sit tandem de Sallustii scriptis statuendum. EPhK 1899, p. 357-62. 572. SCHOELL, F.: Zu Pseudo-Sallusts lnvectiva. RhM 57 (1902), p.159-63. R: Kurfess BJ 183 p. 185-6. Against the thesis of Schwartz (nr. 570).

573. PEISER, G. : De invectivis quae Sallustii et Ciceronis nominibus feruntur. Pr. Posen 1903. R: Loschhorn WklPh 1905 p. 707. May BJ 134, 2 p. 185-9 (!) Both invectivae are by one author; refuted by May, who also deals with the clausulae.

574. WIRTZ, R.: vide nr. 688; p. 47-52. 1910. R: Kurfess BJ 183 p. 186-7.

STUDIES ON SALLUST'S WORKS

50

575. PETZOLD, P.: De Ciceronis obtrectatoribus etlaudatoribus Romanis; p. 27 sqq. Diss. Leipzig 1911. R: Kurfess BJ 183 p. 187.

576. ZIELINSKI, TH.: Cicero im Wandel der Jahrhunderte. p. 280-8: Die Cicerokarikatur im Altertum. Leipzig 19123 1). R: May BJ 134, 2 p. 189 sqq. The Inv. is an exercise in rhetoric, perhaps by L. Cestius Pius.

577. KURFESS, A.: De invectivis quae tamquam Sallustii et Ciceronis traditae sunt. Mn 40 (1912), p. 364-80. R: Klotz BPhW 1915 p. 81.

578. KURFESS, A.: vide nr. 58. 1913. 579. KURFESS, A., Ad Sallustii in Ciceronem quae fertur invectivam. Mn 43 (1915), p. 23-5. R: Klotz BPhW 1915 p. 81. Nigidius Figulus (5, 14).

580. KURFESS, A.: Varia III. Ad Sallustii in Ciceronem quae fertur invectivam. Mn 41 (1913), p. 145-8. Inv. 3, 4.

581. KURFESS, A.: Varia IV. De Fufii Caleni in Ciceronem oratione. Mn. 41 (1913), p. 148-52. Parallels between Cassius Dio 46, 1-28 and the lnvectiva.

582. KuRFESS, A.: Invektiven der Kaiserzeit. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Invektive. Ober die Pseudo-Sallustische Invektive gegen Cicero. Sokr. 2 (1914), p. 512 sqq. 583. STANGL, TH.: Zu Pseudo-Sallustius in Ciceronem, Pseudo-Cicero in Sallustium. WklPh 31 (1914), pl 1182-9. Inv. 2, 3. 3, 4.

584. FUNAIOLI, G.: vide nr. 293, p. 1933-5: lnvektive. 1920. The work is considered to be Sallust's.

1)

585. KuRFESS, A.: Die Invektive gegen Cicero; ein echtes Sttick Sallust. JPhVB 48 (1922), p. 66 sqq. The author appears to be converted here after his previous denials of the authenticity.

586. KURFESS, A.: Zu Sallusts Invectiva in Ciceronem. PhW 42 (1922), p. 935-6. The remark on Cicero's house (1, 2) does not prove that the dating of the work in 54 B.C. is wrong. Some stylistic solecisms point to Sallust's authorship. Originally published in Festschrift Philol. Ver. Mtinchen 1905. He has been followed by other Italian scholars, e. g. Bolaffi, and Bignone, Storia della Jett. lat. III p. 218 (1950).

1) 1)

STUDIES ON SALLUST'S

WORKS

51

587. MEYER, E.: Ciisars Monarchie und das Prinzipat des Pompeius. p. 163-5. Stuttgart and Berli nl9223 • Adopts the thesis of Schwartz (nr. 570).

588. KLOTZ, A. : Miszellen zur romischen Literaturgeschichte; 2. Sallusts politische Flugschriften. PhW 43 (1923), p. 261-3. The Inv. in Cic. is spurious.

589. LEHMNANN-HAUPT, C. F.: Zu Sallusts Invektive gegen Cicero. Kl 19 (1923), p. 104-6. Against Klotz (nr. 588); follower of Schwartz (nr. 570).

590. FARBER, W.: Sallust gegen Cicero. Eine sprachliche Untersuchung. Diss. Tilbingen 1934. R: Klotz PhW 1935 p. 1003-7. Edmar Gn 1935 p. 219-21. Kurfess BJ 252 p. 47. Comp. nr. 594. Concludes that the work is authentic.

591. KURFESs, A.: Zu Sallusts Invektive gegen Cicero. PhW 54 (1934), p.590-1. Inv. 2, 3.

592. KuRFESS, A. : Zur Echtheitsfrage der Sallustinvektive gegen Cicero. PhW 54 (1934), p. 733-5. R: Kurfess BJ 252 p. 47. The clausulae in the Inv. in Cic. point to the authorship of Sallust.

593. KuRFESS, A.: Zurn Schluss der Sallustinvektive. PhW 54 (1934), p. 906-12. Probable date Dec. 54 B.C.

594. KURFESS, A.: Nochmals zur Echtheitsfrage der Sallust-invektive. PhW 54 (1934), p. 958-60. Complementary remarks in pursuance of Farber (nr. 590).

595. MICHELLY, R.: Vide nr. 60. 1936-37. 596. SEEL, 0.: Die Invektive gegen Cicero. KIBeih. 47 NF Heft 34 (1943). Comp. nr. 600; Kurfess (nr. 148, Introduction), however, is convinced by Seel's arguments against the authorship of Sallust.

597. CLIFT, E.: Latin Pseudepigraphica, p. 90 sqq. Baltimore 1945. The Inv. is authentic; comp. Miss L. Ross Taylor (nr. 647) p. 185-6, who agrees with Clift.

598. JACHMANN, G.: Die Invektive gegen Cicero. Miscell. Acad. Bero!. 1950, p. 235 sqq. Comp. Oertel (nr. 599) p. 68 note.

599. OERTEL, Fr.: Sallusts Invektive gegen Cicero (mit einem Anhang zu Sall. ep. ad Caes. II 4). RhM 94 (1951), p. 46-68. The Inv. has been written by Sallust; it is an imaginary oration by Gabinius.

STUDIES ON SALLUST'S WORKS

52

600. BOCHNER, K.: vide nr. 37 p. 78-84. 1951.

Refutation of the arguments of Seel (nr. 596) against the authenticity of the Invective.

601. OLIVIERI SANTIACOMO, L.: vide nr. 374. 1954. P. 283-91 Appendice.

L'inv. in Cic.

Authenticity is probable.

602. KURFESS, A.: Die Invektive gegen Cicero. Aevum 28 (1954) p. 230-8. Review of recent opinions. Kurfess now thinks the Inv. to derive from a historical work (As. Pollio?).

603. HEJNIC, J.: Clodius auctor. Ein Beitrag zur sog. Sallusts Invektive. RhM 99 (1956), p. 255-77. Clodius is the author (53 B.C.). It was answered, in a way, by Ciceros Pro Milone.

604. GABBA, E.: Note sulla polemica anticiceroniana di Asinio Pollione. RSI 69 (1957), p. 317-39. The Inv. is an excerpt from the source of Dio Cassius 46, 1-28 (Fufius Calenus) It is closely related to Appian, B.C. book 3, the address of Calp. Piso.

605. NISBET, R. G. M.: The Invectiva in Ciceronem and Epistula secunda of Pseudo-Sallust. JRS 48 (1958), p. 30-2. A comparison of Inv. 3, 5 and Ep. II 9, 2 with Rut. Lupus 1, 18 (frg. of Lycurgus) shows the dependence of the letter from the invective. Therefore, both documents are spurious.

606. BOCHNER, K.: vide nr. 381. 1960. P. 20-40 Die Inv. Sallusts gegen

Cicero.

Arguments in favour of its authenticity.

607. SCHMID, W.: Die Komposition der Invektive gegen Cicero. H 91 (l 963) p. 159-78. Arguments in favour of authenticity. B.

EPISTULAE AD CAESAREM 1 )

608. JORDAN, H.: De suasoriis ad Caesarem senem de republica. Berlin 1868. The ,,letters" are forgeries.

609. EUSSNER, A.: BJ IO p. 204-7 (vide nr. 15). 1878. Critical and exegetical notes by Jordan and Vogel (1874-'77).

610. VOGEL, F.: vide nr. 1204. 1878. The Epistulae are not Sallust's work. 1) Last in his study (nr. 622) provides a full bibliography till 1923 and a survey of the history of the problem; also Chouet (nr. 640), till 1950.

STUDIES ON SALLUST'S

WORKS

53

611. THOMAS, P.: vide nr. 932. 1879. Note on I 15, 6.

612. PAJK, J.: vide nr. 342, II. 1894. Adopts Jordan's thesis.

613. CSEREP, J.: vide nr. 571. 1899. 614. POHLMANN, R. VON: ,,An Casar!" ,,Ober den Staat". Zur Geschichte der antiken Publizistik. Aus Altertum und Gegenwart NF 1911 (Mtinchen), p. 184-276 1). R: Bardt BPhW 1904 p. 938-42. Hauler Er 1909 p. 222. First serious attempt to prove the authenticity of the letters.

615. NOVOTNY, F.: Nova klausulova methoda a pochybna Sallustiana. LF 45 (1918), p. 257-64. R: Kurfess BJ 192 p. 60. The clausulae point to Sallust's authorship.

616. KLEK, J.: Symbuleutici qui dicitur sermonis historia critica, 3: De Sallustii qui ad Caesarem senem inscribuntur symbuleuticis. RhSt 8 (1919), p. 106-13. R: Kurfess BJ 192 p. 60.

617. FUNAIOLI, G.: vide nr. 293; p. 1936-7: Suasoriae. 1920. 618. LEVY, F.: Sallust ad Caesarem II 13. BPhW 1920, p. 1198 sq. R: Kurfess BJ 191 p. 61. Compares with Plato Crito 50 A-E and claims that the Epistulae are authentic.

619. GEBHARDT, 0.: Sallust als politischer Publizist wahrend des Btirgerkrieges. Zwei offene Briefe an Casar. Diss. Halle 1920. R: Kurfess BJ 192 p. 61 and PhW 1921 p. 52-5. In the Epistulae Sallust is the mouth-piece for Caesar's own political ideas.

620. KURFESS, A. : Zur Frage der Echtheit der Epistulae ad Caesarem senem de republica. PhW 42 (1922), p. 165-7. The passages II 7, 4 sqq and 17,2 sq. are compared with Cat. 10, 2 and 13, 7.

621. MEYER, E.: vide nr. 587, Beilage II, 563-588. Sallusts politische Broschtiren an Caesar. 19223 • Historical arguments for Sallust's authorship.

622. LAST, H.: On the Sallustian Suasoriae. CIQ 17 (1923), p. 87-100, p. 151-162. R: Kurfess BJ 212 p. 16-8. I. The Problem and its History (with Bibliogr.). II. The Dramatic Dates and Literary Form. III. The External Evidence. IV. The Internal Evidence of the Second Suasoria. - V. The Second Suasoria and its Relation to the First. VI. The First Suasoria. VII. Conclusion: (Ep. II is an imitation of Ep. I; Ep. I may be an original work ofS.). Comp. nrs. 623,627. 1)

Originally published in SBAkW Mi.inchen 1904 p. 3-79.

54

STUDIES ON SALLUST'S WORKS

623. LAST, H.: A Note on the First Sallustian Suasoria. CIQ 18 (1924), p. 83-4. I 4, 1 paulo ante does nothing to disprove the authorship of Sallust, which now seems almost certain. Comp., however, nr. 640 note 1.

624. P0HLENZ, M. : Eine politische Tendenzschrift aus Casars Zeit. H 59 (1924) p. 183. Ep. II shows too good a composition to be the work of a rhetorician.

625. H0LBORN-BETTMANN, A.: De Sallustii Epistulis ad Caesarem senem de re publica. Diss. Berlin 1926. R: Hohl HZ 1927 p. 135. Drexler Gn 1928 p. 278-83. Kurfess BJ 252 p. 34-5. 1. Ms. tradition, references. 2. Language. 3. Ideas in the Epistulae. The study gives strong philological support for Sallust's authorship.

626. KROLL, W.: Sallusts Staatsschriften. H 62 (1927), p. 373-92

1).

R: Kurfess BJ 252 p. 35-6. Contents, composition and style point to the authenticity of the letters; the programme developed by Sallust is unreal and superficial. Comp. nr. 628.

627. POST, L. A.: The second Sallustian Suasoria. CIW 21 (1927-28), p. 19-23. R: Kurfess BJ 252 p. 37. Ep. II, too, was written by Sallust (comp. Last nr. 622), as may be seen from the use of passages from the same Greek authors; comp. Salmon (nr. 643).

628. GEBHARDT, 0.: Sallusts offene Briefe. PhW 48 (1928), p. 811-14. R: Kurfess BJ 252 p. 36. Maintains against Kroll (nr. 626) the thesis developed in his earlier study (nr. 619).

629. ARNALDI, F.: L'autenticita delle due epistole sallustiane ad Caesarem. SIFC 6 (1928), p. 307-25. The authenticity is beyond doubt, especially after Kroll's study (nr. 626).

630. SEEL, 0.: vide nr. 303; p. 7-32: II. Die Briefe; p. 87-90: Anhang, Die Briefe Sallusts im Altertum. 1930. R: Kurfess BJ 252 p. 39-40. The Utopian projects in the letters are not in accordance with Caesar's policy (against Gebhardt); the differences between the two letters are considerable.

631. SKARo, E.: vide nr. 304. 1930. Comes to conclusions similar to those of Seel (nr. 630).

632. SKARD, E.: vide nr. 474. 1930. Lexicon of the Epistulae.

633. JOHNSON, H. D.: Mactati sunt and the authorship of the second Suasoria. TAPhA 39 (1930). Mactare (II 4, 2) means, as on occasion elsewhere, 'to ruin'. Consequently the passage is no proof against the authenticity of the Jetter (comp. nr. 634). 1)

Compare Forschungen und Fortschritte 3 (1927) p. 154.

STUDIES ON SALLUST'S WORKS

55

634. GEBHARDT, 0.: Sallusts offene Briefe: ad Caes. II 4, 2. PhW (51) 1931, p. 1038. Mactare is used in the sense of Tac. Ann. II 13 (comp. nr. 633).

635. EDMAR, B. : Studien zu den Epistulae ad Caesarem senem de re publica. Lund 1931. R: Gelzer DLZ 1931 p. 1985-9. Cary CIR 1931 p. 205. Constans REL 1932 p. 268-9. Ernout RPh 1932 p. 178. Klotz PhW 1932 p. 319-22. Kurfess BJ 252 p. 38-9. I. Die Unzuliinglichkeit der iiusseren Beglaubigung und der historisch-sachlichen Beweisgrunde. II. Sprachlich-stilistische Untersuchung der Epistulae. 1: Allgemeine Bemerkungen. 2: Kommentar (main part) A. Allgemeiner Tei!. B. Einzeluntersuchungen: Priipositionen, koordin. und subordin. Konjunktionen, Partikeln 3: Satzrythmus. 1 ) Endergebnis (the question is answered in the positive sense, but not without reserve).

636. SKARD, E. : Studien zur Sprache der Epistulae ad Caesarem. SO 10 (1931), p. 61-98. R: Klotz PhW 1933 p. 385. I. Kopulativpartikeln. II. Adversativpartikeln. III. Ego-nos. IV. Supina. V. Einzelheiten. Studies minor elements of language in the letters and concludes that they are authentic.

637. SPREY, K.: vide nr. 306. 1932. R: Kurfess BJ 252 p. 41.

638. DAHLMANN, H.: Sallusts Politische Briefe. H 69 (1934), p. 380-9. R: Kurfess BJ 252 p. 44. Dates: 50 and 46 B.C. The differences between the letters are to be explained by a different political situation.

639. SCHUR,

w.: vide nr.

311, p. 12-31. 1934.

R: Kurfess BJ 252 p. 42-4. The political ideas in the Epistulae.

640. CARLSSON, G.: Eine Denkschrift an Casar ilber den Staat historischphilologisch untersucht. Lund 1936. R: LatteJRS 1937 p. 300-1. Cary CIR 1937 p. 184. Kurfess PhW 1937 p. 130711. Seel DLZ 1938 p. 300-5 (date). Emout RPh 1938 .P· 265. Dahlmann Gn 1938 p. 141-7 (date). Kurfess BJ 269 p. 25-37. Vretska OHS 1938 p. 14. The Problem -The Work (Ep. II). I. Date (51 B.C.). II. Contents. III. Sallust's position in the political struggles. IV. Programme of reforms. V. Rhetorical form of the Epistula.

641. BoLAFFI, E. : vide nr. 356; p. 5-8. La prima Epistola; p. 8-12: La seconda Epistola. 1936. 642. BoLAFFI, E.: vide nr. 317; p. 44-46: L'origine e la natura delle Epistole. 1937. 1)

This aspect is also studied by E. Koestler (nr. 525) p. 16-23 and tab. I.

56

STUDIES ON SALLUST'S WORKS

643. SALMON, E. T.: Concerning the second Sallustian Suasoria. CIPh 32 (1937), p. 72-4. Against Post (nr. 627); the passages deriving from Greek authors do nothing to prove the authorship of Sallust.

644. STEIDLE, W.: Sallusts Briefe an Casar. H 78 (1943), p. 80-96. Analyses Sallust's attitude towards Caesar in the Epistulae, which confirms their authenticity.

645. RATH, H.: Sallusts politische Briefe an Caesar. Diss. Marburg 1943 [not printed]. 646. D. G. : La restaurazione della liberta e della democrazia nel pensiero di Sallustio. Civ. Catt. 1945, p. 397-403. 647. Ross TAYLOR, L. : Party Politics in the Age of Caesar. Berkeley and Los Angeles 1949. The political background of the Epp.

648. CHOUET, M.: Les lettres de Salluste a Cesar. Paris 1950. A study re-considering the arguments in favour of the authenticity put forward by earlier investigators. R: Fraenkel JRS 1951 p. 192-4. Perrochat REL 1951 p. 388-90. Bardon L 1951 p. 233. Leeman Mn 1954 p. 169-72.

650. GRENADE, P. : Les oeuvres mineures de Salluste. IL 2 (1950) p. 17984. In favour of the authenticity of the Epp.

651. OERTEL, FR.: vide nr. 599; Anhang zu Sall. ep. II 4 (1951). 652. BIGNONE, E.: Storia della letteratura latina. (Nodate). III p. 225-36. The letters are authentic.

653. ZAWADZKI, T.: W kwestii interpretacji Sallustiusa Ep. ad Caes. II 4, 2. Eos 45 (1951), p. 111-5. The 40 senators belong to the period 80-50 B.C. (cf. Ep. 1, 4, 1-2).

654. BLASZCZYK, L. T.: vide nr. 369. 1951.

655. MONACO, G.: Due note filologiche. ASNP 21 (1952), p. 63-9. The maxim of D. Laberius, multos timeat quern multi timent, deriving from Solon, was introduced in Rome by Sallust, Ep. ad Caes. 1, 3. This passage is echoed in Laberius and Cic. Off. 2, 7.

656. OLIVIERI SANGIACOMO, L.: vide nr. 374. 1954. P. 37-76 Le Epp. ad Caes. (authentic). 657. DIHLE, A.: Zu den Epistolae ad Caesarem senem. MH 11 (1954), p. 126-30. AnalysisofEp. 2, 1, 3; 1, 8, 2; l, 5, 2; 1, 5, 5. Conclusion: the letters are spurious.

STUDIES ON SALLUST'S WORKS

57

658. UsSANI Jr., V.: Insomnia. Saggio di critica semantica. Roma 1955. R: Williams CIR 1957 p. 164. P. 7: Ep. II; p. 45: Ep. 2, 12, 6.

659. SCHOLZ, G. B.: Sallusts Stellung zum Gelde in seinen Sendschreiben an Casar. Thesis Munster 1956. 660. SKARD, E.: Zu Sallust. SO 32 (1956) p. 105-9. Ep. ad Caes. 1, 8, 1 was inspired by the Cynic diatribe.

661. DIETZ, G.: Sallusts Briefe an Caesar. Thesis Freiburg 1956. I Die Briefe als symbuleutische Sendschreiben. II Der Stil der Briefe (1. Archaischer Stil. 2. Die Gedankenfilhrung der Proomien der Bella und der Briefe).

663. UTTSCHENKO,

s.

L.: vide nr. 379. 1956.

664. MAR6TI, E.: Der zweite Sallust-Brief und Cicero. Acta Sess. Ciceronianae p. 123-41. Warszawa 1957. The passages Ep. 2, 3, 1 and 2, 2, 3 and the data of Caesar's B.G. are viewed in the light of Cicero's letters.

665. VRETSKA, K.: Zur Methode der Echtheitskritik. WS 70 (1957) p. 306-21. Critical examination of the arguments pro and contra the authenticity of the Epp. ; Ep. 2, 4, 2.

666. HORNSTEIN, F.: Zu Sallust, Epist. ad Caes, II 7, 3. RhM 100 (1957), p. 393-4. Read: patriae civibus parentibus Iiberis.

667. SYME, R.: Pseudo-Sallust. MH 15 (1958), p. 46-55. The Epp. are by two different authors. The first letter may date from 46 B.C., but because of its Sallustian style cannot be by Sallust. The second letter makes use of the first, and contains an anachronistic allusion to the nobilis M. Favonius (a homo novus). It seems to date from the Antonine period.

668. STEIDLE, W.: vide nr. 718. 1958. P. 95-104 Zu den Epp. ad Caes. Against Fraenkel and Dihle.

669. NISBET, R. G. M.: vide nr. 605. 1958. 670. KUZMA, M.: Das friihere der beiden Schreiben Sallusts an Caesar. Ein kritisch-exegetischer Kommentar. Thesis Wiirzburg 1959. 671. EARL, D. C.: Political Terminology in Epistula ad Caesarem II. MH 16 (1959), p. 152-8. The use of anachronistic political terms reveals the spuriousness of the letter.

672. BOCHNER, K. : vide nr. 381. 1960. P. 40-82 Der erste Brief an Casar; p. 82-8 Der zweite Brief an Casar. (Both are authentic). Both letters are authentic.

673. VRETSKA, K.: vide nr. 149. 1961, part I.

58

STUDIES ON SALLUST'S WORKS

674. SYME, R.: The damaging names in Pseudo-Sallust. MH 19 (1962), p. 177-9. The L. Postumius and M. Favonius of Ep. 2, 9 did not belong to the factio nobilitatis. Consequently this letter was not written in 50 B.C. Cf. nr. 667.

675. WISTRAND, E.: The date of Sallust's first Letter to Caesar. Eranos 60 (1962), p. 160-173. The letter was written by Sallust in December 48 B.C.

675A. SEYFARTH, W.: Sallusts Briefe an Caesar. Versuch eines Beweises ihrer Echtheit in Hinblick auf die Widersprilchlichkeit der Gesellschaft ihrer Zeit. Klio 40 (1962) p. 128-41. 675B. LEEMAN, A. D.: Sallust, Ep. ad Caes. II, Marginal notes on Vretska's Commentary. Mn 1964, p. 379-383. C. CATILINA 1)

I. The Catilinarian Conspiracy; Historical Background; Sources. 676. QUINTON, A.: La conjuration de Catilina. Acad. de Ste-Croix d'Orleans. Leet. et Mem. 4 (1880), p. 409-509. 677. BmssIER, G.: La conjuration de Catilina. Paris 1905. R: Cauer BPhW 1908 p. 337-42. May BJ 153 p. 89-94. Cantarelli BFC 1905 p. 39-40.

678. WIRTZ, R.: Beitriige zur catilinarischen Verschworung. Diss. Bonn 1910. R: Luterbacher JPhVB 1912 p. 358-61. Kurfess BJ 183 p. 139.

679. STERNKOPF, W.: Ausgewiihlte Reden Ciceros, erkliirt von Halm III 191615 Berlin. Einleitung zu den Katilinarischen Reden. Useful survey of the history of the conspiracy.

680. JONSON, B.: Catilina, his Conspiracy. Oxford 1921. 681. CICHORIUS, C.: Romische Studien p. 130-185. Leipzig 1922. A tabula from 89 B.C., bearing Catilina's name.

682. GELZER, M.: Lucius Sergius Catilina, PW 2. R. II 2 p. 1693-171 l (1923). 683. HARDY, E. G.: The Catilinarian Conspiracy in its Context. A restudy of the evidence. Oxford 1924 2). R: Gelzer PhW 1924 p. 1186 sqq. Last CIR 1924 p. 186 sq. Amim LZB 1925 p. 1228. Emout RCr 1925 p. 86. The titles are only roughly divided into various sections, as most of the numbers belong to more than one section at the same time. 1) Also printed in JRS 7 (1917) p. 153-228. 1)

STUDIES ON SALLUST'S

WORKS

59

I. Crassus, Caesar and Cati!. to the end of 66. II. The conspiracy of 66-65. III. Crassus, Caesar and Catilina to the elections of 64. IV. Caesar and Crassus between the elections of 64 and 63. V. The consular elections of 63. VI. The "consilium rei p. opprimendae" and the "last decree". VII. The conspiracy till the ejection of Catilina. VIII. The exposure and arrest. IX. The decision in the senate. X. The attitude of Caesar and Metellus Nepos.

684. LEVI, P.: Die Verschworung des Catilina. NS 52 (1929), p. 699-723 and 782-806. 685. BALBO, E.: Catilina nel giudizio della critica demagogica. Roma 1929. 686. AMATO, G. P.: La rivolta di Catilina. Messina 1934. R: Lenschau PhW 1935 p. 88 sqq. Curious attempt to 'save' Catiline.

687. ALLEN jr., W.: In defense of Catiline. CJ 34 (1938), p. 70-85. 688. MANNI, E.: Lucio Sergio Catilina. Firenze 1939. 688A. HOFFMANN, W.: Catilina und die romische Revolution. Gy 66 (1959), p. 459-477. 689. SALMON, E.T.: vide nr. 730. 1935. 690. WIRZ, H.: Catilina und Ciceros Bewerbung um das Konsulat fiir das Jahr 63. Probe einer Kritik der Quellen ilber die katilinarische Verschworung. Diss. Ziirich 1864. 691. SCHMIDT, E.: Plutarchs Bericht ilber die catilinarische Verschworung in seinem Verhiiltnis zu Sallust, Livius und Dio. Pr. Lubeck 1885. R: Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 181.

692. BURESCH, C. : Die Quellen zu den vorhandenen Berichte von der catilinarischen Verschworung. Commentatio philologica f. Ribbeck. Leipzig 1888. R: Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 181.

693. WILLRICH, H.: De coniurationis Catilinariae fontibus. Diss. Gottingen 1893. R: Maurenbrecher BJ 101 p. 181-2.

694. SCHWARTZ, E.: Die Berichte ilber die catilinarische Verschworung. H. 32 (1897), p. 454ff(Ges. Sehr. II, 1956, p. 275ff). Comp. nr. 284.

695. VoGT, J.: Cicero und Sallust Uber die catilinarische Verschworung. Auf dem Wege z. nationalpolit. Gymn. III. Frankfurt 1938. 696. SEEL, 0.: Catilina. Der altsprachliche Unterricht 1 (1951), p. 5 sqq.

60

STUDIES ON SALLUST'S WORKS

697. TODD, 0. J.: Dates in the autumn of 63 B.C. Phoenix Suppl. 1952, Studies Norwood p. 156-162. Attempted assassination of Cicero 7 Nov., first Catilinarian evening of the same day, second Catilinarian 8 Nov.

698. KuRucz, J.: Das Ressentiment als Triebkraft der Eierspitzrevolution, beleuchtet