A survey of veterans’ opinions of educational and vocational counseling provided by the Veterans’ Administration under Public law #16 and Public law #346

554 46 11MB

English Pages 143

Report DMCA / Copyright

DOWNLOAD FILE

Polecaj historie

A survey of veterans’ opinions of educational and vocational counseling provided by the Veterans’ Administration under Public law #16 and Public law #346

Citation preview

UMI Number: EP75568

All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.

UMI Dissertation Pum isntng

UMI EP75568 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code

Que ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346



&S& 1

I w l t f s taken from a fable of fen thousand rastoeiily assorted, digits.,* * ' # * » * * * * « * . *

2

faM a of Veterans * answers- to the ftiestlons .in form..I 4 - P*&*#3M> B ■** C* B **

oases in the eho&to objective* « oases in to^'-eho-tan objective* * oases n o t . t o to e objective * * * oases not to toe objective # * *

'S3 8f 87

3

Bestilts of the iO Testlgatlon in to th e -Continuance' to too- ebo-sto o bjectiv e to r one year o r more * *

h

lumber of oases -and percentages o f the e n tire study w ithin each o f toe 3 e la ssifie a tio n # * •». *

92

5- fab le showing toe oases In and Chit o f the ato siit o b je e tiire aoeeM tof to 'P*&* #!S and f ♦B*if^3^o e f « ■* * » * * # « * .* * .*■ *■ * ♦ * *

93

&

f

the m itoer o f eases to the | categories divided according to F*l*#i6 tod ?*6*#3%e* .the number o f oases in m i Out of the objective in each o f toe 3 categories according aM * * * * * * * < # «*.**.**,» * fa b le showing B ate t o r itetesm toation o f m

^p erim en tal C riterio n * * . * *, * .* * *#

«*

8

fab le -shewing toe d istrib u tio n o f reasons to r leaving toe ob jectiv e * * * * * * * ■* ♦ * * *

9

M stribntion. of- the Seasons to r f a ilu r e among toe various' e la ssifto .d i.0na, % * .* * * ** #* *

10 Seasons fo r leaving: toe objectives according to 3 vocational -classificatio n s *. « » »• *. * * Bausons fo r leaving toe objective according to Base fto b e f tod vocation-al classification-! ’and divided between. Pto* $L& and W>h.0*& • ■* * * *

97 98 99

101 102

4

ami io tf o f used dm dMaimiiif %t0mamt s opinion * *. * ■*. * * ». *

Mm

%

Opiniommaisre for es.t&bii'staomi of am OM tofion * * ' # # * * • « * *

107

0

y©t©r-am*s- opinion poll used a t fdioBad# 4**i MV Ooiiat#* t# « . gtinsott, Pi3*eetoir o f fesiin g ■,% ■* * • * * » .

13 OopT* o f jPublio 3^41^ fPiS 1

*

■.%* * ■■# * #■■ *■ ♦ %

' Oopf o f fu b lie $,&* #3^4 > * * ■».* * * * * *

108 1111 113

"Doee to© a&Asememt and guidaiso# ©tryio# to m i oil to to ra m a te e n title d esA 'toioh i s ;pfoAd#d. by tit# I h lto i ftm tos

m d er ■fuMio ja w f th is study ■toe

w ill obsewe. that,

toi# aaidame# 0-emten •M s touched a high m#aswto of' attain^.

m toi'toto

out of" l#i. ocmmsMtois

tosM timg

in toe optaionsr o f too ootosoled 1

to to tto to& a

appnMsal of toe meeds■o f toe ooaM lictoM to o f M i jMoto t o society*

to M s fam ily gtoup* to bis ohosom cm tu to f and



lo to l are v ita l to h is ovm toai geosNto w #lfe» and hgpptoos© tod to to# feed # f-to e

®d toe

fhos# and other facto rs must make o f him m individual toe i s bdpiy to h is

too has s u ffic ie n t competence to give

MS' dependants- to -siefneto standard of living and to to n ity fo r s©» ;t?alusM#: and m$M the ri#*® beep, chosen,

tSMA had

'’Favorable achievement outcomes in a jaa$©fity o f emm-t m v a il as favors®!# by Veterans- counseled, p o in t toward, favorable assessment Of the counseling proeeis g©s#f©liywy I® was estim ated th a t the m sf to- th e Veterans In college

o i Meeplpg/13» .§$**,

ms.

fl,395V1+00, ©»&/ the c o s t.o f :

Oart»#ellng; m& estlaiatfd a t $3fr*SSRl#

'f e l t .:1s about j$

Of the tot*a/iirRssbMOnf 'and *#pj?osents the insurance co st o f safeguarding the tevesteeat*

k. follow-up study « f: iS32 veteran counselees |a ipad© ani: -feetoloal. In s titu tio n s , f t t h -lb# inform ation given by the author o f th is rep o rt we can consider the following question*

“Do

wmim vetfafaofc vms&& On th©i.r ©olieg# tfakkkok program than m th e fflfsd© o r feehnieal I n s titu te train in g pro­ grams? it She following r e s u l t presented in the rep o rt at# ©alighfeai*^:*-

lR...gr,adol -or..:itechMdal.

'usrefest-

68% had e ith e r (x), completed the course ‘saccG^sfaXtf' ■•■ ■■ ■■• ■•

... '

S T . V- . ' : '■■

(a)- were^’ atilX pnrsM ag th e ir tra in in g

32$ had dropped out o r th e ir sta ta s. was 'act. te e m , Beeords o,f ceafibhed

l a tike

o rig in a lly chosen objective shored that** Vgjf remained i s the o rig in a l objective .transferred 'to- ifeX fitei'etoiectives'' SS^E tran sferred to- disM netXy ■d iffe re n t o bjectives I t wee; 'found- th a t -the: fib a ts c te tts tih 'Sit-* n ifie a n tly associated With the ifOp**ontSj numbering 29$, Was' the la c k o f s^adenif background, .meaning lack o f p r e ­ vious schooling*

n e ith e r Mom n o r 'degree of"dieaM-34.t4.es

showed- a s ig n ific a n t aa so c la tia a "with d*!0;pwewt:s»

■-isf the

drop-outs the g re a te st number ware t r « business courses* fh ia might have been p a r tia lly avoided if.X e ss of in te r e s t could have been foreseen in counseling*

fa c to rs related,

to -toe' appraisal o f the- connseXing procedure in d ic a te th a tj78% stayed in .'th e sane o r re la te d o b je c tiv e .7 ?$. had ewtsaed-fassinf grades-, o r .b e tte r , .

In te re s t inventories showed tee d is tin c t p a tte rn s, one in the- Basiansc draining group, end one la- the S k illed fra d e s,draining group.

ougJata.atsi

mmBi

? to. regard.

■m t

o# n o t i t mm §a?e to e to in% oroote on y rto to ♦ In ovbp pm£®$mm$ m m 2* ¥ eto raars j* . t t o « . £a< sdtoloa

it to r .his

w §2 Si

y .jKAw.v-nt-Jig ,.g r o u t- @3*x e o t o n

i

.Educational acMovemauts, fa c to rs, p h y sical and to y o to to to io s "of in te llig e n c e m $ m m m w oom seiea uetaraas

m f o l l o w # m m w stowed too %mm- ma.30M .t5r to t o . o&tto

^ I'-to u t t o e y 'f e l i th e oouuBolof to t o * t o i -hai .stoen empto tine- to

i to o t too rig h t tnscat

fo r the job sad showed good employment reco rd s.’

Survey o f R esults o f ©©angeling #0*- Veterans a t Veterans ’ A iisial.'Stratids SM daiee C enter, U niversity o f fenng^ysM a* 1Mls 1# es aasly sig e f th# foilo.w*% survey male, by MX ton fife Brown o f the V eterans' A daiaistratld® .

. .

.

. . .

isadaaeo ..©sftfer * is tv e r s if y o f i%msyi»®(hi% m p o lis h e d in the pub licatio n "Occupations"1.

fb ls- survey m s made

fo r .tbs .firs t. tia % m § y ear a f te r tuft veterans haft’bow counseled, and a second tia© two years a f te r the c©unsSXtag». -1*0^ s ta fe s th a t the **stoiy -am undertaken to a©te*»lae th e permanence o f the o b jectives e©ltefsft.j to asoe#tgft»:,.tb s re a s o n s .fir -the *»»*e«o»pl#Mo». o f tyatning? to. .IhV estlfate th e auicsgs o f the tra in in g o ffic e in plaolag th ese, she have mmple ts s th e ir im eatioaai ©dueaiiiiiij to le s m .th e degree to which ap p raiser’*# .roccmm^ftations In regard to. tra in in g wars followed?, to iotosmia® th e w atting period before ■©abrane© in to tfsin in g f.■and to coXiseb other data. which might a s s is t in. improving fu tu re adnssMeats,'**. those w fcetass liv in g in Philadelphia wore readied by telephone and onts3ef«*towners were, reached by m aii*. She response the f i r s t year was $ 0 m i the second I*. Brown * she Veteran re p o rts one year l a t e f » occupations ’ iSte?, tS’t t© 9*S|t : Brown. ~ th e Veteran rep o rts two years In fe r » Occupations 2 6 , 3£?+“ 3 6 6 ,

$he f i r s t y©®2? I t was found th a t $% ©£ the to ta l »asber had s ta rte d tra in in g and m m s t i l l in train** ta g in the- vocational o b jectives o rig in a lly se le cted .

At

th e end o f the second year, h i# o f the number were S f ttl t& tra in in g 5 7% had completed tra in in g and #*.f# of' these had. been placed,

i f the 52$, who a t the end of the second

year had n ot remained in study o f th e ir o rig in a l o b jectiv es, 23$ had- begun tra in in g la second o b jectiv es and o f th is

group 18 # were s t i l l la. tra in fe # at. the time of the survey, less;- than %$ had completed train in g l a th e ir second o b jectiv e. Another 3$ haft been declared n ot l a need o f taaiiiSag| 3$ wet# in tra in in g fo r th s lr th ird o bjectiv e o r had bean i a train*? in g for- th ree o r :aoft ©hi©etiue#*-

Sw anther gave the

reasons fo r non-completion o f tra in in g as: ttilln e s s , n o t learning .anything, did. n o t lik e o b je c tiv e , dropped by school o r employer, needed- employment, aggravated d is a b ility , 'tran sferred to re la te d f ie ld s , employer would n ot ra fso f

sa la ry , entered: own business,, found work to© d iffic u lt*

Of

'those who dropped th e ir tra in in g because o f illn e s s , a ll b at one, who was c o a sitte d to -a mental in s titu tio n , planned to continue tra in in g upon recovery.

th e reasons given fo r

discontinuing tra in in g daring the f i r s t year were such the same, as those above: sta te d " , f t was found th a t approximately h a lf * f th# veterans who received on-the- job train in g m m placed in

pmgvm o f g

veterans who were counseled. An iaporfsirt. M peet o f lb© group here represented i s th a t approximately 900 o f the veterans were disab led, and a larg e number pssrsi^j^xjrotio*.

mm

diagnosed as.

fhe m tb o t s ta te s th a t although a

% stg er percentage o f psychonenrotics remained .an tra in ­ ing"

than was expected i t was found th a t

ble to- p re d ic t th a t, the ahaaees

t i t An p ossi­

87 in 100

th e

non-neurotic veteran w ill 'bo found in train in g one year a f te r advisement".

A sim ila r re p o rt was n o t given fo r

th e second year* fiBBBEjaafl Ifee Veteran evaluates counseling; *■ by f a l io r and Isaacson*fhrough gaostioning. those veterans. \Ax> have completed a program o f advisement and guidance, m inves­ tig a tio n should reveal* from the veteran* s p o in t o f view* "the progeni areas o f stfsn g ib and vaslsness. in m o eo w seiing service in order to provide, an opportunity fo r improvemeat o f the program" i t s e l f and Sis© to In d icate the poss­ ib le advantage# to toe obtained from widespread use o f a counseling program fo r a ll people needing such serv ice.

1* Clarence f* f a l l o t sad le e B. Isaacson* ch ie f, Advise­ ment and Guidance .Section* Veterans A dm inistration Regional o ffle e , Denver add Chief* Veterans Adminis­ tra tio n Guidance U nit, Fitzsimmons General Hospital* Denver, Colorado*

*»fhe pappose o f th is etody w m m attempt to measure' the to actio n s o f a sampling o f veterans too ■completed the TOoaiiomat advisement procedure to flira fa te rim s1' id sto istT O tieti &x&d8&te te n te rs to totera##:* J&ttMsugh to# la ^ stifa M o fi. m s

to scope* to

s#e$rcd tmtermation o m ly from the la rg e r ® m M m m tenters**** fact*. tuidamce Center completing i t s a m .iMfvidn&l ste d r t o i t o m $ I n te r toeapporoted in to th is oTOralX report* 9M m subsidiary stu d ies tools: In to account the m r t e i r of rosofioms teteeem veterans eom seied m d er to te M M ie las# -#16 and puhlie &■&to question-

■B airds sent out 658 usable retu rn s m m received* «■■. ' tee weaknesses' th a t e x is t in- the study and ■the problem eclatin g to the adequacy o f toe sample used are ;discussed by th e author in toe following paragraphs* C e r ta in .inlierent weaknesses e x is t in a study o f th is s o rt which must b e considered, as facto rs 1 . In fra , Form G, page 108

19

having influence on the conclusions reached*

While

eases _from the major Qni&mm centers were^included* m I s a random sampling of- oases was selected*

tb i

reepo&aes to the q teste o fe a ire indicated ofee# wealmesses* the Im possibility' of dele-raining the aetmal 'number of ■qitestiomaires delivered to the veterans' to whom ■they ’’were addressed mates th e*eaionlatiaa o f the-percentage f i gmo questionat&e*

.&'th ird tm $ o t $.b ■ihe.-.rilaliimiy

long period o f .time; te o lf e M ;te :fe© .study*. ..fee eases might have been counseled ^a s ' e a rly as m id y ear 1 ^ 5 or as l a t e as 19^9* vfee ^com pleted coverage o f fee s a i l i n g cenM a lso pteitiee inilueacfjig fa c to rs which could m m t .fe opposite .ways* I f .fee more .in te llig e n t o r more academically trained veterans o r those who f e l t a re a l b en efit from■counseling had a g re a te r tendency to* respond* fe# m m I t s would be stewed accordingly*

i f those veterans

'who are m om c ritic a l, o r d is s a te s f ie i had a.'greater tendency to respond* the opposite e f fe c t would be obtained#

Since

fee additional comments added by most o f tlie. veterans responding indicated a l l degrees o f s a tis fa c tio n with a f a i r l y even d is trib u tio n i i t . i s assumed f e a t 'fee response i s a ty p ical cross section o f fee population* ** fee author makes a resume1 o f fee responses by giving the percentages o f re p lie s to fee questions per** t&ining to each area of counseling as follows*

w$n generalt -the responses5were ranked in oMei1;, Tidth 'Response.. W* th e m a t favorable and ifesponse ' the le a s t farGpaMe 'with the exceptions- of questions 12* 1 3 .*, 16 and 20* ib e folloiAn@" sp e c ific conclusions haw been d p » u ■fre irih e . responses#: (Pmomlmgm /founded off' be the n earest- te n th )» .1; Beeentlons : • : T i i g l t o l t g* I f and 20) Hest CM #^) ■f e l t th a t w r y ample-or adeqpnbe. tlme-wae allowed fo r counseling* that, in moot instances * three fourths {76*g$) f e l t th a t the' counselor had a good understanding -o f .their sg titn d ee and personsM ^* and a larg e majority* ($6*0$).. f e l t -that the ap p fsisia W the ■ ' counselor ranged from being of 00me. help and in te re s tin g to highly b e n e fic ia l in the solu tio n o f problems# v* g i ^ i ^ E i s ^ B g n i s i v . ,, „« ■ ^ „ /ltA Dfl* (Questions h, 5 j 6* and 7) $&&»th ird s (62%8$) reported, an acceptable introduction; to -te stin g ! nine*tentiia (9i*2$)' f e l t no disturbing d istra c tio n s 'd u rin g tee tin g | ttee©»:fo:u r-ths (78*9$) reeeiw d a s a tis fa c to ry okplanation o f t e s t resu lts* and most (w*8$> obtained h elp fu l information from testing*

raided tmm I&$&% 3s$a*p~ fill to boiaf m v j imim&ble-. 'SIaco considerable tra^iation o f response is apparent, it:,is txb* po ssib le to ascertain whether the re s u lt was dpe to ‘a general. m isiM derstm dii^ of. the term ■■^eOTpationai Infoxiaaiion** m the of a wearness on the p a rt of the counselors in im partlag :ti« ; '*" ■6* 'Izs&ottano© o f Gmmseliims ■



MX fetft about o n e^ fifth {19 . 9}S) reported th a t the com seling helped, in some to plan a tra in in g p r o g r» f h a lf (h8*®$) indicated th a t the job objective

selected'm s the sa®e;as' tte'' One thi^'had^ in; ' s t a l o;rigiaallrt and ^re#*.femrths' {?%&}§■ f e l t

fti&t the counselor gave some o r considerable help' with onlr. 2.1$ reporting the. counseling' o f ■ •:. no help i^datsoerer. ■ I T i i i i? ) ■^th o u g h *awagr te te rm s were re lu c ta n t .to place a monetar the service, almost h a lf #9v0^> valued i t a t |X5.0O ■ o r more up 'to $5&«Q0* iftfciWw* t hot#- was strong agreement 1.82*911 th a t a l l or most w te ra n s should, have.. com seling. 8-

jfy s-w , i n n iw i

m

rwn^Vi|»|)’m«.

1

‘i~~"i»'i' ihrtWy >hrT*r‘iniillWWioiWi»VrTfri^i»ii^Tnj»iyri©P pro.p0^tfons ot*

tmm r«

sigaiM oahda of th© h f timmtXg

ana

■proportions as s:i i i w ■

She

»sis,

ta ^ ta to© ■ author s o t up

ai^®tM'Oa/pop(laticm, (the nmial m ill hyi# thesis)*

I t Is t
V K :.lhe#* «lif -4a the te n t o f s4ps4f4e;s«e©- and i s the ratio -of the difference between the proportions shorn by the study and by the criterion , to tim standard error o f the proportion shorn by the criterion , • K i s the number in the sample f i s the proportion, determined by

thestudy

7Tis the proportion detestained by

thecriterion