509 38 7MB
English Pages 298
A SPECTROGRAFHIC ANALYSIS OF SPANISH VOWEL SOUNDS
by Robert B, Skelton
A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Michigan 1950
Committee in charge: Associate Professor Professor Assistant Assistant
Professor Lawrence B. Kiddle, Chairman Edward B. Ham Hans Kurath Professor Ernst Pulgram Professor Earl D. Schubert
PREFACE The study of phonetics has been severely hampered* until reoent years* by the lack of a suitable device to measure the acoustic aspeot of speech sounds objectively.
Heretofore, the approach has been
necessarily impressionistic, and a great body of data has been accu mulated by numerous, highly qualified observers.
The vast majority
of these data will undoubtedly be substantiated by means now at our disposal, but it is nonetheless true that these phoneticians of the impressionistic school have been laboring under the severe handicap of being unable to demonstrate palpably their findings. In the absence of devices to describe objectively the acoustic phenomena, scholars have turned to the study of these sounds from an articulatory basis.
X-rays of the mouth have been made, notably by
Rousselot-*- among others, where the top bulge of the tongue was obser ved while the subject pronounced the various sounds,
Palatograms
have likewise been used to determine these points of articulation and with considerable success,2
This physiologic, or articulatory approaoh
has been very successful in explaining the production of speech sounds, but does not, of course, attempt to explain the acoustic aspect of speech.
The distinction between these two types of approach is dis
cussed in detail by Joos.3
1, P, J, Rousselot, Principes de phonetique experimentale, Paris, 19011908 , 2, palatograms were used extensively by G, Oscar Russell, The Vowels, Columbus, 1928. Illustrations may also be found in Eduard Frokosch^ The Sounds and History of the German Language, New York, 1916, 3, MartinJoos, AcousticPhonetics. Language Monograph No. 23 (Balti more, 1948), pp. 8-?. No one seriously interested in sound spectrography can afford to dispense with this work. ii
The sound spectrograph, amply described in the literature,^ has proved itself the answer to this long felt need for an objective meas uring device of acoustic phenomena.
It is hoped that this study will
form a part of the small, but rapidly growing body of literature based on the sound spectrograph. Many persons have helped, in one way or another, in the preparation of this dissertation. I am especially indebted, however, to Professor Lawrence B. Kiddle of the Department of Romanoe Languages and to Professor Earl B. Schubert of the Department of Speech for their constant readiness to contribute both time and advice, from the inception to the conclusion of this dis sertation. I am pleased to express here my sincere appreciation for their in valuable assistance.
1. A detailed description of the sound spectrograph is given in Chapter Two of Potter, Kopp, and Green, Visible Speech, New York, 1947.
TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface
.
.
•
.
»
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
ii
List of I l l u s t r a t i o n s ....................................... vi 0.
I N T R O D U C T I O N ............................................ vii
1.
PROCEDURES
2.
1.1
Informants
1.2
M a t e r i a l s ........................................... 4
1.3
Recording
1*4
Measuring
1.5
G r a p h s .............................................. 9
...............
6
........................
7
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS 2.1
By Individual I n f o r m a n t ........................... 11 2.11
2.2
3.
...................... 1
All i t e m s ...............
14
2.12
The/i/ i t e m s ........................... . . 3 4
2.13
The/e/ items
2.14
The/a/ i t e m s ........................... . 7 7
2.15
The/o/ i t e m s ............................ 99
2.16
The/u/ items
........................... 55
...............
121
By Individual I t e m ................................ 142 2.21
The/i/ items
........................
144
2.22
The/e/ items .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
158
2.23
The/a/ items .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
180
2.24
The/o/ items
.................... 202
2.25
The/ u / items
226
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION 3.1
The Effect of Adjacent Consonants on Vocalic Quality
.................239 iv
3.11
3.2
.................
245
. . . . . .
244
3.12
Centroids
of all /i/ items
3.13
Centroids
of all /e/ i t e m s ................. 248
3.14
Centroids
of all /a/ items
3.15
Centroids
of all /o/ i t e m s ................. 256
3.16
Centroids
of all /u/ i t e m s ...............
. . . . . .
252
260
Minor
E f f e c t s .................. ..
264
3.21
The effect of stress ondispersion. . . .
264
3.22
The behavior of the unaccentedvowels
265
3.23 3.24 3.3
Centroids of all items
Vowel metaphony
. . .
................ 266
The effect of y o d ......................269
Limitations andImplications........................ 272
Table of Measurements......................................... 274 R e f e r e n c e s .................................................. 281
v
3.11 Centroids of all items
3.2
3.3
243
3.12
Centroids of all /i/ i t e m s ................. 244
3.13
Centroids of all / & / items
3.14
Centroids of all /a/ i t e m s ................. 252
3.15
Centroids of all /o/ i t e m s ................. 256
3.16
Centroids of all /u/ i t e m s ................. 260
.............. 248
Minor E f f e c t s ................... .....
264
3.21
The effect of stress ondispersion. . . .
264
3.22
The behavior of the unaccentedvowels
265
3.23
Vowel m e t a p h o n y ........................ ... 266
3.24
The effect of y o d .................... 269
. . .
Limitations and Implications................. 272
Table of Measurements..................... References
274
......................................281
■
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Speotrogram of oorreo
......................... 7
Spectrogram of p i s t a ........................... Spectrogram of pesa
244
....................248
Spectrogram of olfato
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Spectrogram of poca
..................
.
.
.
.
.
252 256
Spectrogram of p u l g a ........................
260
Spectrogram of acequia
271
........................
Spectrogram of patio
............................. 271
Spectrogram of copia
................ 271
vi
INTRODUCTION 0.1 This study proposes to determine, by the use of Sound Spectrography, the behavior of Spanish vowel sounds under various conditions of stress and environment.
Examples were chosen of all vowels under
primary stress, under secondary stress, and in unstressed position. The latter condition includes vowels infinal as well position, before and following the main
as in intertonio
accent.
The environment factor is generally conoerned with the influence of the following consonant.
There are, however, instances where an in
fluence is exerted by a preceding vowel or consonant, vowel.
or by a following
At least one instance of each vowel sound, where applicable,
has been treated in every significant position. The study of historical grammar makes it manifest that the inter influence of sounds is not limited to those in adjoining situations but may extend over a considerable distance.
In this type of sound change,
the most frequent and those most common to other languages are vowel metaphony and the influence of a following yod.
These phenomena will
be treated in more detail in the summary under the respective headings. 0.2 The primary purpose of this undertaking is to establish by an objective method a standard which can be used as a yardstick for later studies in comparative phonology.
These studies will be possible in
the many dialects of Spanish itself or in comparisons between Spanish and other languages.
At the same time, this study will help to deter
mine the value of speotrographic analysis in the field of foreign lang uage studies. 0.3 since this study may possibly be of interest to some unfamiliar vii
with the pronunciation of Spanish, it seems advisable to transcribe phonemioally the Spanish words used in this material.
A list, together
with an explanation of the phonemes used is given here. /i/ represents a high, front, unrounded vowel as in hijo, / ’ijo/. It is also used for the unaocented semi-vowel in the words soy, /*soi/, and aceite, /a'zeite/. /e/ represents a mid, front, unrounded vowel as in selva, /'selba/. /a/ represents a low, central, unrounded vowel as in tacto, /*takto/. /o/ represents a mid, back, rounded vowel as in poca, /'poka/. /u/ represents a high, back, rounded vowel as in ocupa, /o’kupa/. It is also used to represent the unaccented semi-vowel in pausa, /* pausa/ /y/ represents the semi-consonant corresponding to the vowel /i/ as in oopia, /'kopya/. /w/ represents the semi-consonant corresponding to the vowel /u/ as in huesped, /'wesped/. /p/ is
the
voiceless bilabial stop as in pese, /'pese/.
/t/ is
the
voiceless dental stop as in tose,/ ‘tose/.
/k/ is
the
voiceless
A/
the
voiced bilabial stop initially ina breath group or
is
after an /m/.
velar stop as in costa,/•kosta/.
Elsewhere it is a voiced bilabial fricative.
In this
study it appears in the latter situation only as in selva, / ‘selba/. /d/ is the voiced dental stop as in conducta, /icon*dukta/.
It is
the voiced interdental fricative intervoealically as in roquedal, /rroke’dal/. /g/ is the voiced velar stop as in pulga, / ‘pulga/.
It is a voiced
velar fricative intervooalically as in arruga, /a’rruga/. / 6 / is a voiceless affricate, composed of a voiceless alveolar stop
viii
plus the voiceless alveopalatal grooved fricative as in pecho, /*peco/. /f/ is the voiceless labiodental fricative as in sofooar, /sofo*kar/. / % / is
For all the
the
voiceless interdental fricative as in acequia,/a'zekya/.
informants from the Amerioas, however, it is identical with
/«/• /s/ is the voiceless alveolar grooved fricative as in silba, /' silba/. /j/ is
the voiceless velar fricative as in hoja, /' oja/.
/ m / is
the bilabial nasal as in empuje, /em*puje/.
/n/ is
the dental nasal as in indocta, /in'dokta/,
/l/ is
the alveolar lateral as in selva,
selba/,
/r/ is the voiced alveolar flap as in ahora, /a'ora/, /yt/
is the voiced alveolar trill as in roquedal, /rroke*dal/,
/*/ precedes the syllable bearing the primary stress.
ix
i
CHAPTER I PROCEDURES 1,1 Informants 1.10 The speech of twenty (20) informants has been studied.
These
informants are educated native speakers of the Spanish language who range from eighteen to sixty-five years of age, and, with the exception of one physician, are all either college students or college professors. Female voices, (i.e. high-pitched), are characterized by different resonance areas in normal speech and should, therefore, be studied sepa rately,
It is reoognized that female voices are of equal importance in
a linguistic study, but for the reason stated above, male voices exclu sively have been used here.l 1.11 The informants have been chosen with two considerations in minds geographic location and population distribution.
Geographically
the Spanish-American speakers are representatives of the five large dia lect areas established by Pedro Henrxquez Urena.2 A, First Zone, Indigenous language: Nahuatl 1, Bilingual regions of Southwestern United States 2, Mexico 3, Central American Republics B, Seoond Zone, Indigenous language: Luoayo 1, Spanish Antilles - Cuba, Puerto Rico, Santo Domingo 2, Coast and plains of Venezuela
1, For a comparison between the resonance areas used by male and female voices for the same vowel sounds, see Unit 6 - Profiles of the Vowels with Diagrams of Resonance Positions in a Composite Male and a Composite Female Voice, Potter, Kopp, and Green, op, cit,, p, 282, 2, "Observaciones sobre el espanol en America,'• Revista de Filologxa Espartola, Vol. 8 (1921), pp. 357-390,
3. Northern coastal area of Colombia C. Third Zone. Indigenous languages Quechua 1. Andean Highlands of Venezuela 2. Highlands and Western Coast of Colombia 3 . Ecuador 4. Peru 5* Major part of Bolivia 6 . Northern Chile
D. Fourth Zone. Indigenous languages Araucano 1. Major part of Chile E. Fifth Zone. Indigenous languages Guarani 1. Argentina 2. Uruguay 3. Paraguay 4. Southeast Bolivia 1.12 These areas are represented in this thesis bys A. Zone One - six informants from California (USA), Mexico City and Chiapas (Mexico), costa Rioa, Guatemala, and Honduras. B. Zone Two,- three informants from Puerto Rico, Santo Domingo, and Venezuela. C. Zone Three - five informants from Medellin and Bogota (Colombia), Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia. D. Zone Four - one informant from Santiago (Chile). E. Zone Five - two informants from Argentina. 1.13 On a population basis Spanish America is represented by approximately one
informant for each five million peoplewith
the
exception of Zone
Five where the ratio is one informantforseven and
3 one half million people.
Also in Zone Five only Argentina is represent
ed sinoe speakers from Paraguay, Uruguay, and Southeast Bolivia are not available. 1.4 Spain, the mother-oountry, is represented by three speakers fran the Northern (Burgos), Central (Madrid), and Southeastern areas (Murcia), 1.5 The informants have been designated by letters only in the text. A list together with some pertinent data concerning each informant fol lows . Informant B - Jose* Ortiz, age 33, San Juan, Puerto Rico, teacher of Spanish. Informant C - Rafael Sorrentino, age 42, 1a Vega, Santo Domingo, physician. Informant D - Carlos Lopez, age 20, Quito, Ecuador, student. /
Informant F - Werner Ascoli, age 22, Dept, de Esouintla, Guatemala, student. Informant G - Jose R. Albaladejo, age 65, Murcia, Spain, teacher of Spanish. Informant H - Francisco Villegas, age 32, Heredia, Costa Rica, teacher of Spanish. Informant J - Manuel Guerra, age 26, San Jose, California (USA), teacher of Spanish. Informant IC - Jaime Cacho-Sousa, age 18, Lima, Peru, student. Informant L - Gustavo Saldarriaga, age 18, Medellin, Colombia, stu dent. Informant M - Mario Aguilar, age 20, Mexico City, Mexico, student. Informant N - Roberto A. Gordillo, age 28, Comitan, Chiapas, Mexico, student.
Informant P - Jose" Zablah, age 22, Tegucigalpa, Honduras, student. Informant R -Pedro Caliman, age
25, Caracas, Venezuela, student.
Informant S -Climaco Gomez, age
26, Bogota, Colombia, student.
Informant T -Rene Pena y Lillo,
age 23, La Paz, Bolivia, student.
Informant V -Emiliano Gallo y Ruiz,
age 41, Burgos, Spain, teacher
of Spanish, Informant W - Enrique Anderson-Im.bert, age 40, Buenos Aires, Argen tina, teacher of Spanish, Informant X - Federico Sanchez y Escribano, age 52, Madrid, Spain, teacher of Spanish, Informant Y - Alberto Villalon, age 30, Santiago, Chile, student. Informant Z - Osvaldo Chernitzlcy, age 20, Buenos Aires, Argentina, student, 1,2 Materials 1,20
The vowel sounds studied are, in the main, those treated and
classified aooording to their environments and conditions of stress by Tomas Navarro Tomas in his Manual de pronunoiaoion espanola^ as followsi A, Free and accented
(a,e,i,o,u)
B,
(a,e,i,o,u)
Before /j/
C, Before /l/ at end of syllable
(a,e,i,o,u)
D, Before /rr/
(a,e,i,o,u)
E,
Before /c/ at end of syllable
(a,e,i,o,u)
F, Before /a/ at end of syllable
(a,e,i,o,u)
G, Before /s/ at end of syllable
(a,e,i,o,u)
H, After /rr/
(a,e,i,o,u)
1, 4th edition, New York, 1950, pp, 46-62,
5
I. Free and with secondary accent
(a,e,i,o,u)
J. Intertonio before the accented syllable
(a,e,i,o,u)
K. Intertonic after the accented syllable
(a,e,i,o,u)
L. Final and unacoented
(a,e,o)
M. Before a palatal consonant
(a,e)
N. Before /i/
(e,o)
0 . Before /o/
(a)
P. Before /u/
(a)
Q. Between /a/ and /r/
(o)
1.21 Navarro Tomas suggests elsewhere^- a study of the influence of a following yod on a tonic /e/, /a/, and /o/, and of the metaphony of /•/ or /o/ before a final /e/, /o/, or /a/.
Vowel metaphony is a regu
larly oeourring pattern in Portuguese novo with a close tonic vowel, and nova with an open tonic, due to the difference in height of the final vowels.2
Navarro appears to consider such patterning in Spanish to be
dialectal, but examples of these features are inoluded in the thesis. 1.22 A list of words featuring the Spanish vowels in the environ ments specified has been prepared.
These words, which illustrate one
or more of the categories defined in 1 .20 , are as follows: olfato
oapataz
pioaoho
cascajo
puntal
arruga
terrazo
tacto
ocupando
patio
pausa
ahora
explicate
ocupa
epooa
edicto
peoho
espejo
selva
correo
1. Cuestionario lingttistico hispanoamericano, Buenos Aires, 194S. 2. A discussion of vowel metaphony in Portuguese may be found in Edwin B. Williams, Prom Latin to Portuguese, Philadelphia, 1938, pp. 97-99.
5
I. Free and with secondary accent
(a,e,i,o,u)
J. Intertonio before the accented syllable
(a,e,i,o,u)
K. Intertonio after the acoented syllable
(a,e,i,o,u)
L. Final and unaccented
(a,e,o)
M. Before a palatal consonant
(a,e)
N. Before /i/
(e,o)
0 . Before /o/
(a)
P. Before /u/
(a)
Q. Between /a/ and /r/
(o)
1.21 Navarro Tomas suggests elsewhere* a study of the influence of a following yod on a tonic /e/, /a/, and /o/, and of the metaphony of /•/ or /o/ before a final /e/, /o/, or /a/.
Vowel metaphony is a regu
larly occurring pattern in Portuguese novo with a close tonic vowel, and nova with an open tonic, due to the difference in height of the final vowels.2
Navarro appears to consider such patterning in Spanish to be
dialectal, but examples of these features are inoluded in the thesis. 1.22 A list of words featuring the Spanish vowels in the environ ments speoified has been prepared.
These words, which illustrate one
or more of the categories defined in 1 .20 , are as follows: olfato
oapataz
pioaoho
cascajo
puntal
arruga
terrazo
tacto
ocupando
patio
pausa
ahora
explicate
ocupa
epooa
edicto
peoho
espejo
selva
correo
1. Cuestionario lingttistico hispanoamericano, Buenos Aires, 1945. 2. A discussion of vowel mot aphony in Portuguese may be found in Edwin B» Williams, From Latin to Portuguese, Philadelphia, 1938, pp. 97-99.
6 arquiteoto
empuje
acequia
aceite
tc^quese
roquedal
capftulo
hijo
silba
irrito
indocta
pista
mftico
sofooar
ho ja
conducta
costa
copia
soy
susurro
pulga
susto
peso
poco
pesa
poca
pese
tose
1.23
These words have been spoken and recorded in isolation.
possible that some vowel sounds would be appreciably .altered if spoken in context and it is true that a word is generally used in context. Nevertheless, there appear to be two good reasons why words in isolation should be the basis of this study.
In the first place, word stress can
be altered under the pressure of sentence stress.
For example, if we
are interested in the pronunciation of accented /o/ between /a/ and /r/, as in the word /a’ora/, the word in isolation will give us the informa tion we seek.
If this word were pronounced in context as in the sen
tence ahora viene, the word would in all probability be pronounoed /'aura/ or even /'ara/.
In the second place, this thesis is not con
cerned with the pronunciation of the word as a word, but rather with the sound of the vowel under certain mechanioal or physical conditions of environment and stress, preferably devoid of meaning and subjective response.
This procedure is, moreover, technically the more efficient. 1.3 Recording
1.30 The recording was done under as nearly identioal conditions as possible.
The informants were asked to read at approximately the
same rate of speed, which was about two hundred syllables per minute, at a distance from the microphone of four to six inches.
It is
7 1.31
Presto Green Seal recording discs were used on a Radiophone,
Model AR-20, at a recording speed of thirty-three and one-third revo lutions per minute. 1.4 Measuring 1.40 The spectrograms, which measure about twelve inches in length, cover a span of 2.4 seconds, or about 200 milliseconds per inch.
The
time element is expressed on the horizontal axis, and the spectrum ap pears on the vertical.
This vertioal dimension measures two inches and
covers the frequencies from 70 to 3540 cycles per second, 1.41 On the time axis, the measurement is made where the signifi cant resonance bar, generally the second, reaches the orest or trough of an arc, as the case may be.
A photograph of
(oo)rreo is shown at the right with the significant points indicated.
^
The "v1* at the top indil-
cates the point on the time axis where the forlmants, (i.e. resonance bars), indicated by the appropriate figures at the left of the picture are measured.
(co)rreo
In certain instances where no formant rises anddescends
but continues on a straight line, the measurement.is taken atthe mid point in time of the vowel utterance.
In passing, it may be pointed
out that the straight line may be horizontal or on a diagonal, depending on the looation of the resonance areas of the adjoining sounds. 1.42 At this point of the time axis, three measurements are taken along the frequency axis.
They ares
1) Base line, (indioated by B-), to the upper limit of the first for mant, (indicated by 1-). 2) Base line to the upper limit of the second formant, (indioated by
8 2-). 3)
Base line to the upper limit of* the third formant, (indioated by
3-). The third resonance bar, or formant, is frequently missing, parti cularly for the unstressed vowels and the back vowels.
Occasionally it
was impossible to bring out a second formant in a syllable under second ary stress even using minimal attenuation. formants for the /i/ of indoota.
This occurred with four in
Such cases were, of course, omitted
from the study. All the measurements taken are given in the appendix in the unit of measurement used, which was one thirty-second of an inch.
For rea
sons of economy, however, the graphs are limited to Bar One against Bar Two, since all the information at our disposal! leads us to believe that there is little significance attaohed to Bar Three insofar as the ordinary vowels are concerned.2
1. The relationship of Bar Three to the two lower bars has been observed, for example, by Ralph K. Potter and Gordon E. Peterson in ’’The Represent ation of Vowels and Their Movements,” The Journal of the Acoustical So ciety of America, XX (July, 1948), pp. 328-536, reprinted as Monograph B-15^6""'5y the Bell Telephone System. 2. Many studies have been made which included an investigation of the Bar One to Bar Three and Ear Two to Bar Three relationship. In none of those which have so far come to the attention of the writer, has any significant relationship been established. Preliminary investigations indicate that a study of the fronted back vowels of French, the backed front vowels of Scandinavian, (Cf. Eduard Prokosoh, A Comparative Ger manic Grammar, Philadelphia, 1939, p. 109), the unrounded back vowels in the Turkish three-dimensional vowel system, and the exaggerated rounding of back vowels in Swedish, as in the word bo, (Cf. Leonard Bloomfield, Language, New York, 1933, pp. 106-107)/“probably would shed some light on the function and value of Bar Three. Joos, op. cit., states: "The third-lowest band is much more con stant, so that it doesn't seem to do much differentiating among sounds”, p. 45. On page 46 he writes: "In distinguishing among vocal qualities, it is the two lowest resonance bands that are most significant; study of the others may reveal facts of secondary importance." Further comment in the same tenor may be found on pages 50 and 57.
9 1.5 Graphs 1.50 In reading the graphs, it should be noted that the figures are given in cycles per second, (o.p.s.), and that the ordinate, con trary to general graphic portrayal, decreases as it ascends.
This de
parture from, the regular practice was occasioned by the desire to have the relative positions of the vowels coincide with the standard vowel triangle of the usual texts. 1.51 The graphs which follow are all on a linear scale of one to one except those which portray the complete triangle.
These are like
wise linear but with a ratio of one to two, a feature imposed by the size and shape of the page. 1.52 The figures at the top of the graph are the measurements of Bar One, and those on the left margin represent the measurements of Bar Two. At the risk of over-simplification, we should note the correspon dence of Bar One with tongue height and Bar Two with tongue retraction.2 Movement to the left on the graph corresponds to raising, movement up ward, to retraction of the tongue.
Thus /i/, a high vowel, is found to
the left of /e/, and the central vowel is lower on the graph than the back vowels. 1.53 Although this thesis is not concerned with the absolute shape of the vowel triangle, it may be pointed out that the logarithmic scale more accurately represents the acoustic effect, and that on this scale.
1. In this regard we are following the procedure employed by Joos, op. oit., p. 53. 2. This point is discussed in detail by Joos, op. cit., on pages 57-58. He suggests that Bar One might be called throaT^resonance and Bar Two mouth resonance, but points out that lip rounding and larynx height, for example, are i'actors which must also be considered.
10 the sides of the triangle are more nearly equal .1
1. The vowel triangle on a logarithmic scale is discussed and illustra ted by Joos, op, cit., p. 85.
CHAPTER II RESULTS AND ANALYSIS 2.1 By Individual Informant 2.10
In this first series of twenty graphs, the results obtained
have been plotted for each individual informant.
All eighty-five items
are shown on each graph, indicated only by the phoneme in question and without regard to situation. The purpose of this series is to present an overall picture of the vowel triangle and the relative positions of the various phonemes.
Thus,
when graphs are later presented which deal with one phoneme only, no special orientation will be neoessary.
Movement to the right is due to
lowering, and movement upward is due to backing.
This will be true of
every graph in this thesis. The important feature to notice in this series is the difference in the location and shape of the vowel triangles of the various inform ants and also the locations of the mid vowels relative to the cardinal points.
Some informants, for example, locate the mid vowels half-way
between the high and the low vowels, while others tend to pronounoe them nearer the high vowels.
We shall return to this consideration in the
next chapter when the individual items as spoken by all informants are compared. As was to be expected, the professors show more olarity in their speech than most of the other informants.
This is shown by the minor,
or non-existent overlapping of the vowel areas.
None of the informants,
however, showed the great amount of overlapping we find in studies of the English vowels. 11
12 This is not surprising*
In the range where Spanish has to find
room for only the /i/ and /e/ phonemes, English has to distinguish the five heard in peat, pit, pate, pet, and pat. Approximately the same situation holds true for the opposite side of the triangle.*
1. Although this thesis is not in itself concerned with comparative phonology, it might facilitate the understanding of this project to note the results of a previous study by the writer. Ten English vowels were recorded each in ten different environments, half of them being repeated, for a total of one hundred fifty utterances. The recording was done over a two weeks period, all utterances being made by the same speaker. The results of this study are presented on the following page as an insertion before the series described in 2 ,10 . The speaker spent the first seventeen years of his life in Michigan, the next twenty in various parts of the world. His parents were natives of Michigan.
13
1046 1155
1318 1372 1426 1480 1535 1589 _J
-i
1697 1805
2076 2130 2185
2347 2402 2510
2673 2727 2781 2836 2880 The distribution of* English vowel sounds.
14
3 4 1 667 721 775 829 884 938 992 1046 1101 1155 1209 1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1535 1589 1643 1697 1751 1805 1869 1913 1968
3 9 5
4 5 0
5 § 8
6 0 4
•u
.
«
i
.u u;
u
’u ! • «
u u
8 2 9
o o : o ; o
o o
7
1
8 8 4
9 3 8
9 9 2
1 0 4 6
1 1 0 1
1 1 6 5
.o o,
a
o o
1
•
u
. O , .a a ,a a , a . a ,a a : a aaa1 .a a ' a a a a
I
.
.
. ..
j
.
.
...
a je o,« .
. ..
•
« e«e.9.«.
2022
2076 2130 2185 2239 2293 2347 2402 2456 2510 2564 2619 2673 2727 2781 2836 2880
7 7 5
7
6 6 7
6 1 J2
... .
.•
:® •
•
4 .4
«
!o
t
1 i i 1 1
a. Informant B. All Items.
l
.
1 2 0 9
15
3
! t t ;u
: f i. 4 * ; 1 * ;uuu j
:
1 i.
• . *
« 1 t
i 4 i T i 1
’ » 4 * t
; 4 ; »
•
ia . o e .a
*
. ...
r .
• • ..... . ® .9 a e ; .. „ J . S 9 4 . .ooe 0 , -
,
......
. ..
*
—
.
.
j --
i ■*
i !
.
, .: .. . . ..
,
t
9
.
.
4
-
O
-
.
-
4
1 *
1
-
j
4
♦ 1 * -
7
*
i
*
-
f
4
.
i.
« — -
4
*
I
*•
-
•
i 1 1 I \
j i 4 ♦..
i
...
‘-j
*
4 ■
.
-
4
-
-
*
t
:
... • •
t -4
-
*
t
,
|
*
7"
4
*
. i
*
«-
*
•
-- 4
....
»
*
t
♦-
—
4
•
j-
*
-
-
*
.
t
t
4
-
f
* -
1 - ......
1
-
4
t
•
-
f--*
4(
;
i.
!
•
-
♦
• t ,
4-
-
i
4
-j
-
i
»
i
.
^
^ —
♦
•
7-
4
•
\
t
i
t—
♦
I
*
i •
i
•
♦
t
*
*
Informant C. All itom8 e
♦
-
4
• • -
..«
.
't
4 i * • . i
►
.
^ .
T •
4
l
4
. .
4 - t•; 1 -t
.
•
i ;
.ill i
• 1 * ! ■ i •
1 -
Ji .
• ,
I i r : ;
.
V
1
! j ; : 1 i 1 1 » i i •
1 t t i
-
. I . ...
.
1 2 0 9
.
.
.
■
I
•
■ i
* -
1 i ; 1 ; i 1 , ! i ♦
I » i 4 1 t j i 4 | ! | T { I -f
1 1 5 5
1 1 0 1
1 > ! i | i 'J ! i t * » • ’ i « * 1 i ' \ i | | , I 1 i 1 i i * i .ana. J i I { i * i ** ; i a ;aaaj ia a. a , j a . 4 1 ,a . J * ! * i.a .] .... j.. ,-t — * - *■
! t
t
*
•
\
j 1 4 i 1 1 4 i • 1 * i * 1
! i * t :
1 0 4 6
9 9 2
9 3 8
8 8 4
! f i i *
,
';; * ! 1 ; .o . .
4 1 i
i ! i I
o
! i 4 I f-
, iu i i , : , .u
8 2 9
o o
♦
i i i 1 i I 1 ! ’f 4 \ * y 1 1 i .. • i ; i o oi i ooo .o oi 000 iO : O O i° 4 f-■* t 1° . i t ( * la 1 1 o o
u i 1u ! ! , i i i 1
7 7 5
7 2 1
1 ■
• » . t T i .
1 T i
1 * i T i
6 6 7
6 1 2
5 0 4
o
667 721 775 829 884 938 992 1046 1101 1155 1209 1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1635 1589 1643 . .. 1697 1751 1806 1859 1913 1968 2022 2076 2130 2186 2239 2293 2347 2402 —2456 2510 2564 2619 2673 2727 2781 2836 2880
4 5 0
3 9 5
-
4
•
-
16
3 4 1
3 9 5
4 5 0
6 6 7
6 1 2
6 0 4
7 2
1
7 7 5
8 2
9
667 721 775
829 884 938 992 1046
u u
u u u u
u u u
o o ,o ;° o
1101
1155 1209
u
o io ,
1263
1318 1372 1426 1480 1535 1589 1643 1697 1751 1805 1859 1913 1968
u
a a a a a a a a a a &
® .0 9 . 099 . 0 , 9 999..99® . _®«® . 9 9 ..
2022
2076 2130 2185 2239 2293 2347 2402 2456 2510 2564 2619 2673 2727 2781 2836 2880
; O
O O o ooo o o o o o o
1 1 1 1
i 1
1 i i i
Informant D, All Items.
8 8 4
9 3 8
1 0 4 6
1 1 0 1
1 1 6 5
1 2 0
9
17
3 4 1 667 721 775 829 884 938 992 1046 1101 1155 1209 1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1535 1689 1643 1697 1751 1805 1859 1913 1968
3 9 5
4 5 0
T
5 0 4
6
6 6 7
7 7 2 7 1 5
8 8 4
8 2 9
9 3 8
9 9 2
u u u
8 u o u u. u ooo i o .o ,o o o o o 0 . 0 0 o o o u ; .
:U
t
• *
.a a
o e e 9
eee
2022
2076 2130 2185 2239 2293 2347 2402 2456 2510 2564 2619 2673 2727 2781 2836 2880
5 5 8
e o
i i
i i 1 i 1 i 1
Informant P. All Items.
a tU; aaa.t I a a; a .a
1 0 4 6
1 1 0 1
1 1 6 5
1 2 0 9
18
3 4 1 667 721 775 629 884 938 992 1046 1101 1155 1209 1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1535 1689 1643 1697 1751 1805 1859 1913 1968
3 9 5 ! ' . u
4 5 0 ! ‘ : u .w
«
5 0 4
. •
;
6 6 7
7. 8 8 7 2 8 5 9 4
.
*
; ,
; u
4
;
. 4
j , i
.o
.
.
u
. U 1 I
,
7 2 1
i 1 i • I t
u u i u I t
M
j
938 992 1046 1101
1156 1209 1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1535 Informant H. All /u/ items .
667
721
775
132 287
341
395
460
604
568
612
667
721
776
721 776 829
884
938 992
1046 1101
1166 1209
1263 1316 1372
1426 1480 1536 Informant N. All /u/ Items.
M
133 207
341
395
460
504
568
721 776 829
884 938 992 1046 1101
1155 1209 1263 1318 1372
1426 1480 1535 Informant P. All /u/ items c
612
667
721
775
134 287
341
395
450
504
558
721 775
029 884 938 992 1046 1101
1155 1209
1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1535 Informant R. All /u/ items
612
667
721
775
135 207
341
395
450
504
558
612
667
721
775
721 775 829 884 938 992
1101
1155 1209
1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1535 Informant 8• All /u/ items.
1
136
287
341
395
460
604
668
612
721 776 829 884 938 992 1046 1101
1156 1209 1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1635 Informant T. All /xx/ itema .
667
721
776
137 287
341
395
460
604
668
612
667
721
775
721 776 829 884 938 992 1046 1101
1165 1209 1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1535 Informant V. All /u/ itom*0
I
138 287
341
395
450
504
558
721 775 4--
829 884 938 992 +-■
1046 1101
1155 1209 1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1535 Informant W. All /v»/ items e
612
667
721
775
139 287
450
395
341
604
568
612
667
721
775
721 776
B
C
i
i — 829
884 .
1 —
I
938
I-----
'T
992 1046 -a---
1101
1166
i
D
•f1209 h 1263
r
1318
i .. _
4 1372 1426 ■
f
1480 1635 Informant X. All /u/ items.
140
287
541
595
450
504
556
721 775 829 884 958 992 1046 1101
1165 1209 1265 1318 1372 1426 1480 1636 Informant Y. All /u/ items.
612
667
721
775
141 287
341
395
450
504
558
612
721 775 829 884 938 992 1046 1101
1155 1209 1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1535 Informant Z. All /u/ Items.
667
721
775
142 2.2 By Individual Item 2.20
We have seen in paragraph 2.10 how the triangles of the vari
ous speakers vary both in shape and position on the scale.*
We should
note, for example, that in producing the / a / phoneme, the range of the second resonance area, or formant two, varies in c.p.s. from 1372 to 1589 for Informant B, but from 1589 to 2022 for Informant H.
At only
one point, namely 1589, do the two speakers coincide, and Informant B used this frequency for only one utterance!
The same phoneme varies in
height, (i.e. formant two), from the 667-884 range of Informant D to the 884-992 range of Informant J.
Obviously, the shape of D's triangle
must be different from that of J*s, since both speakers use the 390-504 range for the high front vowel and the 390-558 range for the high back vowel.
Likewise, the shape of B*s triangle must differ from H*s unless
attended by a corresponding shift in the other two cardinal points.
The
median utterances of the two speakers, which do not reveal such shift. are as follows*
A/ Informant H Informant B Difference
2564 2456 108
A/ 1751 1480 271
A/ 1101 1046 55
Comparing formant two of Informants L and Y, we note that although there is insignificant overlap between the front vowels of the individ ual speakers, Informant Y*s range for / e / extends higher than Informant L's range for /i/i
Informant L Informant Y
Compare the ranges indicated by asterisks*
A/
A/
A/
*2347-2076 2781-2456
2130-1805 *2510-2076
1697-1372 2022-1372
1. Compare Joos, op. cit., p. 60
143 Wo should also note formant one of Informants X and D.
Here we
find the former’s /©/ range included in the latter's /a/ range.
Note
the ranges indicated by asterisks:
A/ Informant X Informant D
450-558 395—504
/•/ *667-775 504—667
A/ 829-1046 *667—884
It is apparent, in the light of the foregoing comparisons, that if we compare L'a /i/ in pioacho with that of Y, X's /e / in peso with that of D, or B's /a/ in tacto with that of Hi without correcting for indi vidual differences, the result will serve only to conceal the informa tion we are seeking.
Since the concern of this thesis is the relation
ship of the various utterances of each phoneme according to environment, some means of correction is necessary. The simplest procedure would be, of course, to superimpose the /i/ graphs of all the informants one over the other in such a way that the mid-points would coincide.
It would then be a simple matter to compare
the various /i/ sounds of silba, pista, hijo, etc., to each other.
This
procedure is not feasible in fact, but it can be done abstractly by plotting, for example, all the silba utterances from the mid-point of each individual's area of A / utterances, and continuing thus for each item .1 This mid-point, or centroid, has been determined as the intersection of the two medians.
In the few cases where the median fell precisely
between two steps, the mean ’was used to cause it to fall to one side or the other, since we are using graphs where fractions cannot conveniently be plotted.
The median of the centroids of all informants for each pho-
1. This is the procedure used by Joos, op. cit., pp. 84-87.
144 neme mas then ascertained, and each Informant's utterance was corrected correspondingly as his centroid varied from, the group median.
The cor
rections will be given as the appropriate graphs are presented. In the following series of eighty-five graphs, it will be noted that all the items are enclosed in an irregularly shaped area.
The
boundary line circumscribes all utterances of the phoneme regardless of environment.
It thus serves to indicate the relationship of each
item to the phoneme as a whole, 2,21
The next series of twelve graphs presents the individual /i/
items as spoken by all informants, corrected as explained in the pre ceding paragraph.
The sound in question is indicated by the letter
underscored in the Spanish word at the foot of the graph. The letters on the graphs refer to the informants as listed on pages 3 and 4, The group median for the /i/ sounds is 504 for formant one, and 2456 for formant two,
A list of the individual medians together with
the corrections applied follows; irmant
Median Form, 1 Form, 2
Correction Form, 1 Form,
B
504
2456
OOO
000
C
504
2456
000
000
D
450
2347
454
+109
F
504
2402
000
+ 54
G
450
2402
+54
+ 54
H
504
2564
000
-108
J
450
2402
+54
+ 54
K
450
2402
+ 54
+ 54
L
450
2185
+54
+271
145
Informant
Median Form. 1 Form. 2
Correction Form. 1 Form
M
504
2510
000
- 54
N
504
2456
000
000
P
450
2619
+54
-163
R
504
2727
000
-271
S
558
2564
-54
-108
T
504
2564
000
-108
V
504
2564
000
-108
W
504
2510
000
- 54
X
504
2456
000
000
Y
504
2619
000
-163
Z
450
2402
+54-
+ 54
146 263
287
341
896
460
604
668
612
607
721
2022 2070
2130
2259
2293
2347
2402
2466
R X
2610
2664
2619
2073
2727
2781
m ftioo /'mitilco/ All informants
€
147 233
287
341
396
460
604
558
612
667
721
2022
2076
2130
2186
2259
2293
2347
2402
2456
BFN 2610
M
T
V W
2664
2619
2727
2781
1
oapitulo /^ca'pitulo/ All Informants*
1
148
233
287
341
396
450
504
558
2022
2076
2130
2185
2239
2293
2347
2402 P W 2456 V Y 2610
2664
2619
2673
2727
'2781
2836
pleaoho /pi’lcaSo/ All informants.
612
149 233
287
341
396
450
604
668
2022 2076
2130
2186
2239
2402
L X
2610 H F 2664 N Y 2619
2673
2727
2781
2886
indoota /ln'dolct*/ All Informanta„
612
667
721
233
287
341
398
460
604
668
2022 2076
2130
2186
2239
2293
2347
2402
MW
2466
2610
2664
2619
2673
2727 2781
2856
irrito / i ’rrlto/ All informants.
812
667
721
151 253
287
541
596
460
604
668
612
667
721
2022
2076
2150
2186
2239
2293
2547
W X
2402
2456
2610
2664
2619
2673
2727
2781
2856
irrlto /i'rrito/ All informants.
I
152
233
287
341
395
460
504
558
612
667
721
2022 2076
2130
2185
2239
2293
2347
2402 U
Y
2510
2619 2673
2727
2781
2836
I
•dioto /e'dilcto/ All informants.
11
153 233
287
341
396
450
504
668
612
667
721
2022
2076
2130
2186
2239
2293
2402
2466
2610
2664
2619
2673
2727
2781
2836
All informants.
i
154 233
287
541
396
460
604
558
2022
2076
2150
2185
2259
2293
2547
2402
2466
2610
2564
2619
2875
2727
2781
2856
silba /'silba/ All informant s ,
612
155
233287
341
396
460
604
668
2022
2076
2130
2186
2239
2293
2347
2402
2456
N W
D X
2610
2664
2619
2673
2727
2781
2836 pista /' piata/ All informanta .
612
156 233
287
341
396
460
504
668
2022 2076
2130
2186
2259
2293
2347
2402 2456
2610
2664
2619 V
W
2673
2727
2781
2866
m it loo /•mitikro/ All informants
612
667
721
157 233
287
341
396
450
504
556
612
2022
2076
2130
2186
2293
2402
2456
2510
2564
2619
2673
2727
2781
2856
arquitsoto ^ r k i ’tskto/ All informants.
667
721
158 2.22
The next series of twenty graphs presents the individual /e/
items as spoken by all informants, corrected as explained in paragraph 2.20.
The sound in question is indicated by the letter underscored in
the Spanish word at the foot of the graph. The letters on the graphs refer to the informants as listed on pages 3 and 4. The group median for the / & / sounds is 667 for formant one, and 2130 for formant two.
A list of the individual medians together with
the corrections applied follows {
Informant
Median Form. 1 Form. 2
Correction Form. 1 Form. 2
B
721
1968
- 54
+162
C
667
2022
000
+108
D
612
2022
♦ 55
+108
F
667
2022
000
+108
G
667
1968
000
+162
H
667
2456
000
-326
J
667
2022
000
+108
K
558
2130
+109
000
L
667
2022
000
+108
M
667
2239
000
-109
N
667
2130
000
000
P
667
2239
000
-109
R
667
2347
000
-217
S
667
2293
000
-163
T
612
2185
+ 55
- 55
V
721
2076
- 54
+ 54
W
721
2347
- 54
-217
159
Informant
Median Form. 1 Form* 2
Correction Form. 1 Form. 2
X
721
2185
- 54
- 55
Y
721
2239
- 54
-109
Z
612
2130
+ 55
000
160 668
612
667
721
775
1751
1806
1869
1913
1968
2022
2076
2130
2186
2239
R X
2293
2347
2402
2466
2810
2664
pecho /' pa8o/ All informants.
829
684
936
1751
1805
1859
1913
1968
2022 2076
2130
2185
2239
2293
2347
2402
2466
2610
2664
162
1751
1805
1869
1915
1968
2022
2076
2130
2185
2259
2295
2547
2402
2466
2610
2664
o
pase /• pasa/ All Informant*
163 460
504
558
612
667
721
775
1761
1605
1869
1913
1968
2022 2076
2130
2186
H X
1C Y
T W
2239
2293
2347
2402
2456
2510
2664
a
aooqula /a *»ekya/ All Inforaant a .
829
884
938
164
450
504
658
612
667
721
776
1751
1805
1869
19 IS
1968
2022
2076
2130 N
X
2185
22S9
B M
2293
2347
2402
2466
2510
2564
e All informant*
829
684
938
165 450
604
568
612
667
721
776
1751
1805
1869
1913
1968
2022 2076
2130
2186
2239
2293
2347
2402
2456
2610
2664
e
•dloto /•'dllcto/ All informants.
829
884
938
166 450
504
568
812
667
721
776
1751
1005
1 859
1915
1968
2022 2076
2150
S W
2186
2259
2295
2547
2402
2456
2610
2564
e
eapejo /aa'pnjo/
AH
infornanta.
829
884
958
9
167
460
504
668
612
667
721
V Z
W J
776
1761
1806
1869
1913
1968
2022 2076
2180
2185
2239
2293
2347
2402
2466
2610
2664
e
•mpuja /am'puje/ All Informant*.
829
864
938
168
460
504
668
612
667
721
776
1751 1806 1869
R
W
N
V
P X
1913 1968
2022 2076 2130 2186 2259 2293 2347 2402 2466 2610
2664 o
terraso /te'rraso/ All infonBanta.
829
884
938
169 460
504
658
667
721
776
1751
1805
1859
1913
1968
2022
2076
2130
2186
2259
2293
2547
2402
2486
2610
2664
p All informants
829
884
938
170 460
504
668
612
667
721
776
1751
1805
1869
1913
1968
2022 2078 J
M
2130
2186
2239
2293
2347
2402
2486
2610
2664
e
eepejo
/as'pa J
o /
All Informant*.
829
884
938
171 460
504
658
612
667
721
F M
B Y
776
1751
1806
1869
1916
1968
2022 2076
2130
2186
2239
2293
2347
2402
2466
2610
2564
a
aoaita /a*malt*/ All informants.
829
884
938
172 460
604
668
612
667
721
776
K
L
1751
1805
1859
1915
1968
2022
W
V
2076
2130
2185
2259
2293
2347
2402
2466
2610
2564
e All Informants.
829
938
173 504
568
612
667
721
776
829
1751
1805
1859
1915
1968
2022
2076
2130
2186
2239
2293
2347
2402
2466
2610
2664
©
arquiteoto /arki•takto/ All informants,
884
9XA
174
460
604
668
612
667
721
776
1761
1806
1669
1918
1968
2022 2076
2130
2186
2239
2293
2547
2402
2466
2610
2664
«
pet* /'peaa/ All informants.
829
884
175 568
812
667
721
776
829
1751 1805 1869 1913 1968 2022 I 2076 2150 2186 2259 2293 2347 2402 2466 — -2610 2564 A
ex plioate /oks *pllkat«/ All informants.
884
938
176
668
612
667
721
776
1751 1805 1869
1913 1968 2022 2076 2130 2185 2239 2293 2347 2402
2456 2610
2664 e
toques* /' tokeae/ All informants.
829
884
938
177 668
612
667
721
776
829
1751 1805 1869
1913 1968 2022 2076 2130
P Y
! B L V "C D T
H
2186 - +2239 2293 2347 2402 2466 2610 I-
T
2664 ©
roquedal /r roles’dal/ All Informants.
884
178 460
504
668
612
667
721
776
1751 1805 1859
1913 1966
2022 2076 2130 L
N
2185 2239 2293 2347 2402
2456 2510 2564 « All informants.
829
884
938
179 460
504
658
612
667
721
776
1751 1805 1869
1915 1968 2022 2076 2150 2186 2259 2295 2547 2402
2466 2610 2664 ©
All infom&nts „
829
864
958
180 2.23 The next series of twenty graphs presents the individual /a/ items as spoken by all informants, corrected as explained in paragraph 2.20.
The sound in question is indicated by the letter underscored in
the Spanish word at the foot of the graph. The letters on the graphs refer to the informants as listed on pages 3 and 4. The group median for the /a/ sounds is 938 for formant one, and 1589 for formant two.
A list of the individual medians together with
the corrections applied follows* Informant
Median Form, 1 Form. 2
Correction Form. 1 Form. 2
B
884
1480
+ 54
+109
C
992
1589
- 54
000
D
775
1589
+163
000
F
938
1589
000
000
G
938
1589
000
000
H
1046
1751
-108
-162
J
938
1589
000
000
K
938
1589
000
000
L
938
1535
000
+ 54
M
938
1643
000
- 54
N
992
1589
- 54
000
P
992
1643
- 54
- 54
R
992
1589
- 54
000
S
992
1643
- 54
- 54
T
938
1697
000
-108
V
992
1697
- 54
-108
W
938
1697
000
-108
181 Informant
Median Form. 1 Form. 2
Correction Form. 1 Form. 2
X
992
1697
- 54
-108
Y
992
1697
- 54
-108
Z
938
000
000
1589
182 667
721
776
829
884
938
992
1263 1318 1372 1428 1480 1535 1689 1643 1697
1761 1805
V K
1869 1913 1968 2022 2076
All Informants.
1046
1101
1166
183 667
721
776
829
684
938
992
1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1536 1689
1697 R
V
1751 1805 1869 1913 1968 2022 2076 olfato /ol'fato/
1046
1101
1156
184
667
721
776
829
884
988
992
1318 1372 1426 14B0
S
W
1536 1689 1648 1897 1751 1806 1859 1913 1968
2022 2076 fX
capatas /Icapa'tas/ All Informants*
1046
1101
1166
185
667
721
776
829
884
938
992
1046
1101
1166
1263 1318
4 1372
ii
1426 1460 1636 1689 1643
DW
1697 1761 1806 1869 1913 1968 2022 2076
oasoajo /We’kajo/ All informants»
m
186
667
721
776
829
884
988
992
1263
1318 1372 1426 1480 1535 1689
V W
1643
R X
1697
1751 1805 r—
1859 1913 1968 2022 2076
arruga /a'rruga/ All Informants.
1046
1101
1166
187
667
721
775
829
884
938
992
1046
1101
1166
1263 1318 1372
1480 1535 1689 1643 L R 1697 1761 1805 1869 1913 1968
2022 2076 terrazo /ta'rrazo/ All informants.
d
188 667
721
776
829
884
988
992
1263 1318
4— 1372 1426 1480 1635 1589
1897 1761 1806 1869 1913 1968 2022 2076
All informants,
1046
1101
1166
189 667
721
776
829
884
938
992
1046
1263 1318 1372 1426 1460 4-
1536 1689 W X 1643 1697 1751 1806 1869 1913 1968
2022 2076 ooup&ndo /oku'pando/ All informanta.
0
1101
1166
190 667
721
776
829
884
938
992
1318 1372 1426 1480 1S36 1689 I f
Y
1643 -t-
1697 1761 1806 1869 —
4-
1913 1968 2022 2076
All informants.
1046
1101
1166
191
667
721
776
829
884
9S8
992
1046
1101
1166
1265 1318 1372 1426
i i*
1480
i
1536
i HTK
i r» i
k
u j w
1689
s!
1697
1751 1806 1869 1913 1968 2022 2076
oasaajo /Icas’kajo/ All informants.
192 667
721
775
629
864
958
992
1263 1318 1372 1426 i !I
1480 1535
it
1689
1645 1697 1761 1806 1869 1913 1988 2022 2076 puntal /pun'tal/ All informants.
1046
1101
1166
193
667
721
775
829
884
938
992
1263 1318 1372 1426
D V W X
1480 1S36 1589
1697 1761 1805 1869
1913
1968 2022 2076 ahora /a'ora/ All informanta,,
1046
1101
1156
194 667
721
776
829
884
938
992
1046
1101
1166
1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1635 1589
1697 1751 1806 1859 1913 1968
2022 2076
All informantsa
«
195 667
721
775
829
884
938
992
1046
1263 1318 -f
1372 1426 1480 1535 1569 1643 1697 1751 1806 1859 1913 1968
t2022 2076 a
oapatas /feapa'tac/ All informants.
1101
1165
196 667
721
776
829
684
938
992
1046
1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1635 1589
1697
D W
1751 1806 1869 1913 1968
2076 a
explloate /#k**plikmt#/ All lnforaantB.
1101
1166
197 667
721
776
829
884
938
992
1263 1318 1372 1426
1480 1536
B W
Y
M
1689
1643
1697 1751
1806 1869
1913 1968
2076
a. All informants.
1046
1101
1166
198 667
721
776
829
884
996
992
1046
1269 1318 1372
1480 1635 1589 1643 1697
V Y
1761 1805 1869 1913
1968 2022 2076 oapltulo /ka'pitulo/ All Informants,,
1101
1166
199
667
721
776
829
884
988
992
1268
1318
1372
1426
1480
1636
M X
1689 K
V
1648
1697
1751
1806
1859
1918
1968
2022 2076
sofooar /sofo'kar/ All informants.
1046
1101
1166
200 667
721
776
889
884
938
992
1263
1318
1372
1426
1460 R
K
1636 D
M
B
V
1689
1643
1697
1761
1806
1869
1913
1968
2022 2076
a
All informants.
1046
1101
1166
201 667
721
776
829
884
988
992
1046
1101
1166
1268 1318
1372
1426
1480
1636
1689
1648
W X
1697
1761
1806
1869
1918
1968
2022
2076 conduct* /^con'dukta/ All informants.
f l
202 2,24
The next series of* -twenty-two graphs presents the individual /o/
items as spoken by all informants, corrected as explained in paragraph 2,20,
The sound in question is indicated by the letter underscored in
the Spanish word at the foot of the graph. The letters on the graphs refer to the informants as listed on pages 3 and 4, The group median for the / o / sounds is 667 for formant one, and 1155 for formant two,
A list of the individual medians together with
the corrections applied follows* Informant
Median Form, 1 Form, 2
Correction Form, 1 Form, 2
B
721
1155
- 54
000
C
721
1101
- 54
+ 54
D
721
1155
- 54
000
F
612
1101
4- 55
+ 54
G
667
1155
000
000
H
667
1101
000
* 54
J
667
1101
000
+ 54
K
667
1101
000
+ 54
L
667
1101
000
54
M
667
1101
000
+ 54
N
721
1155
- 54
000
P
667
1101
000
♦ 54
R
667
1101
000
♦ 54
S
667
1155
000
000
T
721
1155
- 54
000
V
721
1209
- 54
- 54
Yf
667
1155
000
000
203 Informant
Median Form, 1 Form, 2
Correction Form, 1 Form, 2
X
721
1155
- 54
000
Y
721
1155
- 54
000
Z
667
1101
000
+ 54
204 450
504
668
612
667
721
776
829
884
938
721 775 829 884 938 992 1046 1101
If V
1166 1209
H Y
1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1635 ocupando /oku'pando/ All informants.
4
205 450
804
668
612
667
721
775
721 775 829 864
938 992 1046 1101
1155
T W
1209 1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1535
All Informants«
829
884
938
206 450
604
666
612
667
721
776
829
721 776 829 684 938 992 1046 1101
H X
1166
V Y
1209 1263 1318 ._
4_.
1372 1426 +—
1480 1535 sofooar /sof o 1kmr/ All infonaante.
884
938
207 450
504
558
612
667
721
776
721 775 829 884
938
992 1046 1101
HG
1155
1±J2L 1209
1263 1318 1372
1426 1480 1635
All iaf ormanta.
829
884
938
208
721 775 829
864 938 992 1046 1101
1155 1209 1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1535 oeupa /o»lcupa/ All informants.
209 450
504
659
61,2
667
721
776
829
884
936
721 775 82.9 —
-----------
884
938
f
992 H
K
X
t 1
1046
D
1101
1 1 X j
W
J C U L N P V
F
2
B
I i i t
Y
1209
-
i i
| |
N
I I 1
1
! 1
P
S
1263
V
J
1155 T
'
i > ______i
0
\ i \ 1 1 i
I
\ \ \__________
! 1 i
1 _____ i i i
i t
1318
i
/
1372
/
1426 1480
^
t I
:
! I
i 1
!
!
!
I
; 1635 ,
..
. . . . i. ... / i ' ! I
-
! f t ! 1 1 ----- i---- _J------ ------
'
pooo /'poko/ All informants.
210-
721 776 829
884
938 992 1046 1101 1156" 1209
1263 1318 1372
1426 1480 1535 tosa /*tose/ All informants.
211
460
504
668
612
667
721
775
721
775 B29
884 938 992 1046 1101
1155 1209
1263 1318 1372
1426 1480 1535 olfato /ol'ftto/ All informants.
829
884
938
211
460
804
668
612
667
721
776
829
721 775 829 884
938 992 1046 1101
1156 W
D
1209 1263 --t1318 1372
1426 1480 1635 olfato /ol'fato/ All informants.
884
938
212 460
604
668
612
667
721
776
721 775 629 884 938 992 1046 1101 1156 1209 1263 1318 1372 1426 1480
1635 thor* /a»or*/ All lnforaanta.
829
884
938
213 450
504
568
612
667
721
776
721 775 829 884 938 992 1046 1101
1155 1209
V Y
1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1635
correo /ico'rvo/ All Informants.
829
884
938
214 450
504
668
612
667
721
775
829
721 775 829 884 938 992 1046 1101 1166 1209 S
I f
1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1635
roqueda1 /rroka*da1/ All Informants.
884
938
215
450
504
558
612
667
721
775
829
884
938
721 775 829 884 938 992 1046 1101 1156
T W
n
y
1209 1263 1318
D
V
1372 " T
1426
— 1480 1535 indoota / i n ’dolcta/ All Informantse
I---
216 460__ 504
668
612
667
721
776
721 775 B29 884 938 992 1046 1101
U R
1156 1209
1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1535 hoja /'oja/ All informants
829
884
938
217 450
504
668
612
667
721
776
829
721 775 629
864
938 992 1046
1101 1166 1209
1263
N X L R K W
1318 1372 1426 1480
1635 conducta /Vcon’dukta/ All informants.
884
938
218 450
504
558
612
667
721
776
829
721 775 829 i— 884
938 992 1046 1101
1155 1209
1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1535 oosta /'koata/ All informants.
884
938
219 450
504
558
612
667
721
775
721 775 829 884 938 992 1046 1101 1155 1209 1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1535 soy / a o i / All informants•
829
884
938
220 460
504
666
612
667
721
776
721 776 829 884
938 992 1046 1101
1166
LTY 2LJL
1209 1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1635
All inform&nta.
829
864
938
221 460
504
668
612
667
721
776
721 775 829 884
938
992 1046
K
H
RW
1101 1165 1209 1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1635
All informants.
829
884
938
222 450
504
668
612
667
721
775
721 776 829 884
938
992 1046 1101
L V 0 W
H X
1166 1209
1263 1318 1372
1426 1480 1635 /'mitiko/ All informanta.
829
884
938
223 450
504
668
612
667
721
775
721 776 829
864
938 B U N V
992 1046 1101
'
1166 1209 1263 1318 1372
1426
1480 1635 aofooar
/sofo'kar/
All informants.
829
884
938
224 450
504
668
612
667
721
776
721 775 829 884
938 992 1046 1101 1155
W P
1209
1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1535
All Informants.
829
884
938
225 450
504
668
612
667
721
775
721 776 629 864
938 992
L
R
1046 1101 1165 1209
1263 1318 1372
1426 1480 1635
All informants.
829
884
938
226 2.25
The next series of eleven graphs presents the individual /u/
items as spoken by all informants, corrected as explained in paragraph 2.20.
The sound in question is indicated by the letter underscored in
the Spanish word at the foot of the graph. The letters on the graph refer to the informants as listed on pages 3 and 4. The group median for the / u / sounds is 504 for formant one and 992 for formant two.
A list of the individual medians together with
the corrections applied follows; Informant
Median Form. 1 Form. 2
Correction Form. 1 Form. 2
B
504
1046
000
- 54
C
504
992
000
000
D
450
938
♦ 54
♦ 54
F
450
992
* 54
000
G
450
938
♦ 54
♦ 54
H
558
1101
- 54
-109
J
504
884
000
•♦■108
K
504
938
000
♦ 64
L
504
992
000
000
M
504
992
000
000
N
504
1046
000
- 54
P
504
938
000
+ 54
R
504
938
000
♦ 54
S
558
992
- 54
000
T
504
1046
000
- 54
V
558
1046
- 54
- 54
W
504
1046
000
- 54
227 Informant;
Median Form. 1 Form. 2
Correction Form. 1 Form
X
504
938
000
* 54
Y
504
1046
000
- 54
Z
504
992
000
000
228
I 287
341
395
450
504
558
612
667
721
775
721
776
829
F ir H 6 DFX
884
938
992
1046 1101
1155
1209
1263
1318
1372
1426
1480
1535
All informant*.
m
228 287
341
395
450
504
558
612
721
776
829
P W H 0 DFX
884
938
992
1046
1101
1155
1209
1263
1318
1372
1426
1480
1535
ooupa / o ’k u p a / All informants.
667
721
775
229 287
341
395
460
504
858
612
721
775
829
884
938
992 B
1046
V
L W
1101
1155
1209
1263
1318
1372
1426
1480
1536
•uaurro /•u finrro/ All informants,,
667
721
775
230 287
341
395
450
504
558
612
667
721
775
721
775
829
884
938
992
M N
1046
1101
1156
1209
1263
1318
1372
1426
1480
1636
puntal /pun'tal/ All informantso
4
231 287
341
395
450
504
558
612
721
776
829
884
938
992
V Z F W
1046
1101
1155
1209
1263
1318
1372
1426
1480
1536
arruga /a'rruga/ All informants.
667
721
775
232 287
341
395
460
604
668
612
721
776
829
P G
884
938
1046
1101
1156
1209
1263
1318
1372
1426
1480
1536
empuje /©m'puje/ All informants.
667
721
776
233 287
341
395
460
604
668
612
667
721
775
829
884
938
H X
992
1046
1101
1166
1209 -4
1263
1318
1372
1426
1480
1536
oonduota /kon'dulcta/ All informants.
721
776
234 287
341
395
450
604
558
612
667
721
776
721 776 829
884
938 992
1046
1101
1155 1209
N V
1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1536
■uaurro /eu'surro/ All informants.
1
235 287
341
395
460
504
668
612
667
721
775
721 775
829
884 938 992
L M
1046
1101
1155 1209 1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1535
All informants.
I
236 287
341
395
450
504
558
612
721 775 829 884 938 992 1046 1101
1155 1209 1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1635 auato /' susto/ All informants.
667
721
775
237 287
341
395
450
604
568
612
667
721
776
721 776
0W
829 884
If R
938 992 1046 1101
1156 1209 1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1536 ocupando
/oku'pando/
All informantae
4
238 287
341
395
450
604
668
612
667
721 776 829 884 938 992 1046 1101
1156 1209 1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1636 capitulo /Vm'pitulo/ All informants.
721
776
CHAPTER III SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 3.1 The Effect of Adjacent Consonants on Vocalic Quality 3.10 In this summary, the centroids determined by median position of the items in paragraph 2.2 are given first.
Although the median
centroids probably present the more realistic picture, they fail to distinguish clearly one item from the other.
For this reason, the cen
troids established on a mean basis have likewise been plotted, for what ever further light they may shed on the problem. The mean centroids have been plotted to the nearest tenth, so that one-eighth of an inch represents a difference of about five and one-half cycles per second. graphs, however.
A word of caution is indicated in reading these The difference of five and one-half c.p.s. is a much
finer distinction than can be read from a spectrogram, and is, in all probability, too small a distinction to be perceived by the human ear. The threshold of perceptibility, in a study made by Joos^-, was found to be about one half-tone, deteriorating in the neighborhood of the mid central vowel to about three half-tones at extreme low-back.
Accuracy
impels us to add that Joos was not satisfied with the results, deploring the small amount of time available for the study, the execrable listen ing conditions, and the fact that only untrained American observers were available.
The only safe conclusion which can be drawn is that the
least perceptible change is probably smaller than that found by Joos. In the discussion of our findings, frequent reference will be made
1. Joos, op. oit., p. 83
240 to Navarro Tomas* Manual, the standard text Tor Spanish phonology, al though various dialect studies show, contrary to Lens' judgment, di vergencies in the vowel systems of the different areas,^ For example, although Hills® and Espinosa® frequently disagree in detail, they are in accord that the New Mexican vowel system departs from standard Spanish in many respects,
Marden^ for the Spanish of
Mexico City, Lenz5 for that of Chile, and Gagini6 for Costa Rican note little divergency from the Castillian vowels,
Lentzner^ points out none
for Guatemala, Josselyn6 used palatograms and the pneurnatograph to study the speech of seven Castillians,
His results, given in terms of tongue
height, are interesting in the way they correspond to Bar One of the spectrograph.
He is concerned with the number of variants of each
1, "— se infiere que para el espanol de America hay que partir de un habla popular espanola bastante nivelada del siglo XV, cuyos rasgoscaraoteristioos se borraron luego, en su mayor parte, por el espanol cl&sico del siglo XVI," Rodolfo Lenz, El espanol en Chile, Biblioteca de Dialectologia Hispanoamericana, Vol. 6 (Buenos Aires, 1940), p, 171, 2, E.C. Hills, "El espanol de Nuevo M^jico," El espanol en Mejico, los E3tados Unidos y la America Central, Biblioteca de Dialec^ologfa His panoamericana, Vol'. 4 (Buenos Aires, 1938), pp, 1-73, 3, Aurelio M. Espinosa, Estudios sobre el espaftol de Nuevo Mejico, Bi blioteca de Dialeotologla Hispanoamericana, Vol, l“XBuenos Aires, 1930), pp. 54-58, 4, Charles C, Marden, "La fonologia del espanol en la oiudad de Mejico," El espanol en Mejioo, los Estados Unidos y la America Central, Biblio■beca de Dialectologia Hispanoamericana, VolT”4 (Buenos Aires, 1938), pp, 87-187, 5, Lenz, op, cit,, pp, 167-172, ^ 6, Carlos Gagini, "El espanol en Costa Rica," El^ espanol en Mejico, los Estados Unidos y la America Central, Biblioteca de Dialectologia Hispanoaraericana7 V o l , 4 (Buenos Aires, 1938), pp, 235-237, 7, Karl Lentzner, "Observaciones sobre el espanol de Guatemala," El es panol en Mejico, los Estados Unidos y la America Central, BiblioteoalTe Dialec-fcologia Hispanoamericana, Vol,- 4 (Buenos Aires, T5"38), pp. 227232. 8, Freeman M, Josselyn, Etudes de phonetique espagnole, Paris, 1907, pp. 9-25,
241 phoneme, and, although it appears that he attributes the variation to the position of the vowel in relation to stress, a specific statement to that effect is lacking.
His results clearly show the influence of
adjacent consonants, even though he denies any such influence,^In mismjtsima, /inis ’misima/, he finds the pretonic open, the tonic medium, and the posttonic close.
In interprete, /in*terprete/, the
tonic is open, the intertonic close, and the final medium.
Also open
are the vowels in ser and e^L and the tonic of huesped, / ’wesped/. Medium are the tonics of ouento, /'kwento/, tente, /* tente/, and both vowels of tente, /t en ’te/. tente.
Close are the posttonics of huesped and
Observing cantara, /*kantara/, and acacia, / a ’kazya/, he finds
the tonics and the pretonic open and the posttonics close.
From morbo-
so, /nor'boso/, he concludes that the tonic and pretonic are medium and the final is close.
In oucuruoho, /cuku*ruoo/, he finds the first
medium, the second close, and the tonic open. The results are incomplete rather than erroneous.
Interesting is
his division of the phoneme into open, medium, and close as compared to the open, close, and relaxed distinction made by Navarro Tomas and many other investigators.
Colton^ finds two variants of the high vowels,
three of the low, but four of the mid-vowels.
This is pertinent to our
findings which indicate that the phonemes could be divided into any number of allophones desired.
It is only a question of how many arbi
trary dividing lines one might wish to draw. The following series of summaries of the individual phonemes is preceded by a graph showing the median centroids of all the items indi
1. Josselyn, ^p. cit., p. 17. 2. Morton Avery CoTEon, La phonetique castillane, Paris, 1909, p. 21.
242 cated only by the phoneme in question.
The purpose of this graph is to
show the relationship of the various vowels to each other and thus to orient the reader for later graphs which examine the individual phonemes in detail.
243
667 721 775 829 884 938 992 1046 1101 1165 1209 1263 1318 1372 1426 1480 1536 1689 1643 1697 1751 1805 1859 1913 1968 2022 2076 2130 2185 2239 2293 2347 2402 2466 2510 2564 2619 2673 2727 2781 2836 2880
-4
1i i u ; !uu L I u I u I oo oo (ooooj ° . :ooo; oo ;
, OOO
i OOO
i .
, ft
I ft
ft HU ftft
*
—
_
I
..
I
* --
A
r 4
.
I
—
'r r
e T I*0* ... iooo
t
-r i
i
; i.
..
t -- r ■ t 1 4 .
.
JLli^ *
-
1
----- f
-
-
:r : m :
-1 • —
4
--k -
-f-'
—
-
-t-
f -i-
r
— i ------------ i - .
4-
Summary of oentroids of all items. All informants.
3.11 The graph, showing the mean centroids requires no key.
The capital letter in each
word indicates "both the item in question and its location on the graph. The pertinent information for the median centroid graph of the /i/ items follows t Key
C o n t r o l Median
Item
pista d s. Mean
Standard Deviation.
B
m£tioo
504-2564
499-2553
1.6
C
capftulo
504-2510
482-2505
1.3
D
picacho
504-2456
477-2478
1.4
P
indocta
504-2456
509-2467
1.6
G
irrito
504-2402
520-2429
1.6
H
irrito
504-2347
531-2358
1.1
J
edicto
504-2456
526-2445
1.3
K
hi 0°
504-2510
504-2494
1.5
L
silba
504-2402
531-2386
1.6
M
pista
504-2456
499-2440
1.0
N
mitico
504-2510
493-2515
1.7
P
arquitecto
450-2402
472-2424
1.5
Navarro Tomasl classifies B, C, and D as close; F, G, H, J, K, L, . M open; N and p relaxed and variable.
Omitting the relaxed, which
will be discussed in 3,22, our results show a gradual progression from close to open except for the last three items which are clearly separa ted from the rest.
In the following, the asterisk indicates Navarro
Tomas’ open items, and the number in parentheses denotes the number of
1. Navarro Tomas, Manual, pp, 46-48.
245 steps between the adjacent items on a close to open progression. Each step, as was indicated on page 239, is equivalent to five and one-half oycles per second. llftico (4)
(6) capftulo (4) picacho (2) ♦hijo (6) *indocta(3) *pista
*edicto (12) *irrito (1) *silba (4) *irrito. Thus mitico is six steps closer than capitulo which isfour steps
closer than
picacho which is two steps closer than hijo, etc.
246 253
287
341
396
460
604
668
612
2022 2076
2130
2186
2239
2293
2347
2402
2610
2664
2619
2727
2781
2856
i
xsmaary of oentroids of all /i/ Items All informants.
667
721
247 600
500
Edioto
pEs pEcho
2300-
irrito Irrito •llba *2400
arqulteoto pista
plo&oho
2500-
oapltulo mftloo
mltioo Mean oentroidB . /i/ items
x Epoe
248 3.12
The graph showing the mean centroids
requires no key.
The capital letter in each
word indicates both the item in question and its location on the graph. The pertinent information for the median i.
Ltroid graph of the /e/ items follows* Key
Item
V
pesa
C e n t r o i d s. Median Mean
Standard Deviation
B
pecho
667-2239
656-2228
1.6
C
peso
667-2185
656-2179
1.8
D
pese
667-2239
656-2212
1.9
F
acequia
667-2185
667-2185
1.2
G
epooa
667-2239
672-2217
1.5
H
edicto
612-2185
634-2190
1.7
J
espejo
612-2130
607-2157
1.6
K
empuje
667-2130
656-2141
1.4
L
terrazo
667-1986
694-1991
2.0
M
oorreo
721-2022
710-2044
2.0
N
espejo
721-2130
721-2092
2.0
P
aceite
721-2022
716-2027
1.6
Q
selva
721-2022
732-2027
1.3
R
arquitecto
721-2130
716-2114
1.4
S
pesa
667-2185
678-2158
2.2
T
explicate
612-2130
601-2157
1.7
V
toquese
612-2130
596-2119
1.6
W
roquedal
612-2130
517-2119
1.9
X
tose
612-2130
628-2087
2.2
Y
pese
612-2130
617-2125
2.5
t
248 3.12
The graph showing the mean centroids
requires no key.
The capital letter in each
word indicates both the item in question and its location on the graph. The pertinent information for the median itroid graph of the /e/ items follows* Key
Item
pesa
C e n t r o i d s. Median Mean
Standard Deviation
B
pecho
667-2239
656-2228
1.6
C
peso
667-2185
656-2179
1.8
D
pese
667-2239
656-2212
1.9
F
acequia
667-2185
667-2185
1.2
G
/ epooa
667-2239
672-2217
1.5
Ii
edicto
612-2185
634-2190
1.7
J
espejo
612-2130
607-2157
1.6
K
empu je
667-2130
656-2141
1.4
L
terrazo
667-1986
694-1991
2.0
M
oorreo
721-2022
710-2044
2.0
N
espejo
721-2130
721-2092
2.0
P
aceite
721-2022
716-2027
1.6
Q
selva
721-2022
732-2027
1.3
R
arquitecto
721-2130
716-2114
1.4
S
pesa
667-2185
678-2158
2.2
T
explicate
612-2130
601-2157
1.7
V
toquese
612-2130
596-2119
1.6
W
roquedal
612-2130
617-2119
1.9
X
tose
612-2130
628-2087
2.2
Y
pese
612-2130
617-2125
2.5
249 Navarro Tomas* classifies B, C, D, F, G, H, J, K, S, and T as close; L, M, N, P, Q, and R open; V, W, X, and Y relaxed and variable. As for the / \ / items, our results show a gradual progression from close to open, with the exception of the S to R gap which is greater than the others.
Using the same system employed for the /i/ items,
our progression is as follows: Pecho (3) explicate and pese (1) espejo (1) epoca (4) edicto (1) acequia (2) peso (5) empuje (1) pesa (15) *arquitecto (5) +espejo (7) ♦correo (4) *aceite (3) *selva (3) *terrazo.
1. Navarro Tomas, Manual, pp. 50-54,
250 460
604
688
612
667
721
776
829
1761
1606
1869
1913
1968
2022 2076
2130
2186
2239
2293
2347
2402
2466
2610
2564 e
Suamary of oantroids of all /a/ itams All informants.
884
938
251 600
700
2000
espEjo
2100 toquEse "quEdal dos E Empuje explicatE Eapejo
pEsa pEso aoEquia quia E aicto
2200 pEse
t
Epooa pEoho
Mean Centroids /e/ items
252 3,13
The graph showing the mean centroids
requires no key.
The capital letter in each
word indicates both the item in question and its location on the graph. The pertinent information for the median centroid graph of the /a/ items follows *
Key
Item
(ol)fato
C e n t r o i d s Median Mean
Standard Deviati*
B
pioacho
992-1751
970-1767
1.3
C
olfato
938-1589
911-1600
1.2
D
oapatas
938-1589
943-1573
1.3
F
cascajo
938-1643
922-1670
1.9
G
arruga
938-1589
954-1589
1.4
H
terrazo
938-1589
933-1616
1.1
J
tacto
938-1643
965-1632
1.3
K
ocupando
992-1589
976-1616
1.6
L
patio
938-1589
965-1594
1.4
M
oasoajo
992-1589
976-1622
1.8
N
puntal
938-1589
965-1584
1.5
P
ahora
938-1480
943-1447
1.7
Q
pausa
938-1426
916-1437
1.4
R
capataz
829-1589
851-1556
1.7
S
explicate
829-1805
807-1762
2.4
T
ocupa
884-1480
906-1480
1.9
V
capitulo
938-1589
949-1611
1.3
W
sofooar
938-1589
938-1589
1.9
X
hojti
884-1535
889-1540
1.7
Y
conducta
884-1589
868-1605
2.1
253 Navarro Tomis^ classifies B as palatal; C, D, F, G, H, J, K, L, V, and W as normal; M, N, P, and Q as velar; R, S, T, X, and Y as variable and relaxed.
Our results show B definitely palatal and F tending toward
palatal; P and Q clearly velar, but M and N, contrary to Navarro Tomas* findings, clearly normal.
We should point out that the relaxed vowels,
although they vary considerably on the front to back plane, are all higher on the vowel triangle than the highest accented a item.
Moving
from palatal to velar position, two asterisks indicating Navarro Tomas' palatal, one, his velar, our results follows **Picacho (19) casoajo (7) tacto (2) *cascajo (1) terrazo and ocupando (1) capxtulo (2) olfato (1) patio (1) sofocar and arruga (1) *puntal (2) oapataz (23) *ahora (2) pausa.
1. Navarro Tomis, Manual, pp. 54-57.
254 667
721
776
829
884
938
992
1046
1263
1
1318
1372
1426
i
t
1480
1536
1689
1643
1697
1761
1805
1869
1913
1968
2022 2076
*
1101
j--------------------- ,------ ,-------------- —
Summary of centroids of all /a/ itoias All informanta.
1166
--- -----
255 800
900
pAusa Ahora
ooupA 1500
ho jA oapAtas oApataa puntAl Arruga pAtio --------- olfAto oApitulo terrAao ooupAndo oascAjo tAoto sofooAr
1600
conductA
oAaoaoo
1700
explioAte
pioAcho Mean centroids /a/ items
256 3.14
The graph showing -fche mean centroids
requires no key.
•-
The capital letter in each
-J*
word indicates both the item in question and its location on the graph. The pertinent information for the median K ^ centroid graph of the / o/ items follows;
Key
Item
poca
C e n t r o i d s . Mean Median
Standard Deviati